FLT3-L level may point to relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Article Type
Changed

 

FLT3-ligand (FLT3-L) levels exceeding 92 pg/mL in bone marrow and 121 pg/mL in peripheral blood are associated with relapsed and refractory disease in patients with multiple myeloma, Normann Steiner, MD, and his colleagues report in a study published in PLoS ONE.

In the study of 14 patients with monoclonal gamm opathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 42 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and 27 patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma, there was a 61% probability that patients with FLT3-L levels above 92 pg/mL in bone marrow had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and a 79% probability that those with FLT3-L levels of 92 pg/mL or less had not relapsed and were not refractory. Based on FLT3-L levels in peripheral blood, values of 121 pg/mL or more were associated with a 71% probability of relapsed or refractory disease. The likelihood of not having relapses or refractory disease was 87% for patients with values less than 121 pg/mL.

“FLT3-L could be useful as a marker to identify (relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma) patients and should be evaluated as a potential target for future therapy strategies,” Dr. Steiner of Innsbruck (Austria) Medical University, and his fellow researchers wrote in PLoS ONE.

The researchers obtained bone marrow aspirates from all patients. Peripheral blood was examined from 4 MGUS patients, 31 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and 16 patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma. Peripheral blood was also obtained from 16 control subjects.

The levels of four potential risk factors were measured – soluble TIE2, FLT3-L, endostatin, and osteoactivin. The most significant association with risk was seen with FLT3-L levels.

Expression of soluble TIE2 in bone marrow differed significantly among the three patient cohorts and may be driven by the same factors that influence FLT3-L levels. However, soluble TIE2 levels were not as effective at differentiating patients at risk for disease progression, the researchers wrote.

Soluble TIE2 expression in bone marrow was highest in MGUS patients (median 4003.97 pg/mL) in comparison to relapsed or refractory disease (median 2223.26 pg/mL; P = .03) and to newly diagnosed patients with myeloma (median 861.98 pg/mL; P less than .001). A statistically significant difference among bone marrow levels of soluble TIE2 was observed for newly diagnosed patients and those with relapsed or refractory disease (P = .03).

However, soluble TIE2 in peripheral blood plasma did not differ significantly in the three cohorts nor did it differ between patients and controls.

In contrast to TIE2 and FLT3-L, levels of endostatin were lowest (median 146.50 ng/mL) in bone marrow plasma samples of patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Levels were higher in MGUS patients (median 190.37 mg/dL) than in newly diagnosed myeloma patients (median 170.15 mg/mL; P = .5).

Similar to soluble TIE2, plasma levels of endostatin in peripheral blood did not differ significantly in the three patient cohorts. Measurements of endostatin in bone marrow and peripheral blood correlated significantly (P less than .001), and peripheral blood levels differed significantly (P less than .001) for patients and control persons.

Osteoactivin expression was highest in the MGUS cohort, with median bone marrow plasma levels of 36 ng/mL as compared with median levels of 24.92 ng/mL in newly diagnosed myeloma patients and 22.30 ng/mL in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma. Osteoactivin levels in peripheral blood did not differ significantly in the three cohorts, but differed between patients and control subjects. Osteoactivin measures in bone marrow and peripheral blood correlated significantly.

Citation: Steiner N, et al. High levels of FLT3-ligand in bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients with advanced multiple myeloma. PLoS ONE 2017 Jul 20;12:e0181487. doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181487.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

FLT3-ligand (FLT3-L) levels exceeding 92 pg/mL in bone marrow and 121 pg/mL in peripheral blood are associated with relapsed and refractory disease in patients with multiple myeloma, Normann Steiner, MD, and his colleagues report in a study published in PLoS ONE.

In the study of 14 patients with monoclonal gamm opathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 42 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and 27 patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma, there was a 61% probability that patients with FLT3-L levels above 92 pg/mL in bone marrow had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and a 79% probability that those with FLT3-L levels of 92 pg/mL or less had not relapsed and were not refractory. Based on FLT3-L levels in peripheral blood, values of 121 pg/mL or more were associated with a 71% probability of relapsed or refractory disease. The likelihood of not having relapses or refractory disease was 87% for patients with values less than 121 pg/mL.

“FLT3-L could be useful as a marker to identify (relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma) patients and should be evaluated as a potential target for future therapy strategies,” Dr. Steiner of Innsbruck (Austria) Medical University, and his fellow researchers wrote in PLoS ONE.

The researchers obtained bone marrow aspirates from all patients. Peripheral blood was examined from 4 MGUS patients, 31 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and 16 patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma. Peripheral blood was also obtained from 16 control subjects.

The levels of four potential risk factors were measured – soluble TIE2, FLT3-L, endostatin, and osteoactivin. The most significant association with risk was seen with FLT3-L levels.

Expression of soluble TIE2 in bone marrow differed significantly among the three patient cohorts and may be driven by the same factors that influence FLT3-L levels. However, soluble TIE2 levels were not as effective at differentiating patients at risk for disease progression, the researchers wrote.

Soluble TIE2 expression in bone marrow was highest in MGUS patients (median 4003.97 pg/mL) in comparison to relapsed or refractory disease (median 2223.26 pg/mL; P = .03) and to newly diagnosed patients with myeloma (median 861.98 pg/mL; P less than .001). A statistically significant difference among bone marrow levels of soluble TIE2 was observed for newly diagnosed patients and those with relapsed or refractory disease (P = .03).

However, soluble TIE2 in peripheral blood plasma did not differ significantly in the three cohorts nor did it differ between patients and controls.

In contrast to TIE2 and FLT3-L, levels of endostatin were lowest (median 146.50 ng/mL) in bone marrow plasma samples of patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Levels were higher in MGUS patients (median 190.37 mg/dL) than in newly diagnosed myeloma patients (median 170.15 mg/mL; P = .5).

Similar to soluble TIE2, plasma levels of endostatin in peripheral blood did not differ significantly in the three patient cohorts. Measurements of endostatin in bone marrow and peripheral blood correlated significantly (P less than .001), and peripheral blood levels differed significantly (P less than .001) for patients and control persons.

Osteoactivin expression was highest in the MGUS cohort, with median bone marrow plasma levels of 36 ng/mL as compared with median levels of 24.92 ng/mL in newly diagnosed myeloma patients and 22.30 ng/mL in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma. Osteoactivin levels in peripheral blood did not differ significantly in the three cohorts, but differed between patients and control subjects. Osteoactivin measures in bone marrow and peripheral blood correlated significantly.

Citation: Steiner N, et al. High levels of FLT3-ligand in bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients with advanced multiple myeloma. PLoS ONE 2017 Jul 20;12:e0181487. doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181487.

 

FLT3-ligand (FLT3-L) levels exceeding 92 pg/mL in bone marrow and 121 pg/mL in peripheral blood are associated with relapsed and refractory disease in patients with multiple myeloma, Normann Steiner, MD, and his colleagues report in a study published in PLoS ONE.

In the study of 14 patients with monoclonal gamm opathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 42 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and 27 patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma, there was a 61% probability that patients with FLT3-L levels above 92 pg/mL in bone marrow had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and a 79% probability that those with FLT3-L levels of 92 pg/mL or less had not relapsed and were not refractory. Based on FLT3-L levels in peripheral blood, values of 121 pg/mL or more were associated with a 71% probability of relapsed or refractory disease. The likelihood of not having relapses or refractory disease was 87% for patients with values less than 121 pg/mL.

“FLT3-L could be useful as a marker to identify (relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma) patients and should be evaluated as a potential target for future therapy strategies,” Dr. Steiner of Innsbruck (Austria) Medical University, and his fellow researchers wrote in PLoS ONE.

The researchers obtained bone marrow aspirates from all patients. Peripheral blood was examined from 4 MGUS patients, 31 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and 16 patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma. Peripheral blood was also obtained from 16 control subjects.

The levels of four potential risk factors were measured – soluble TIE2, FLT3-L, endostatin, and osteoactivin. The most significant association with risk was seen with FLT3-L levels.

Expression of soluble TIE2 in bone marrow differed significantly among the three patient cohorts and may be driven by the same factors that influence FLT3-L levels. However, soluble TIE2 levels were not as effective at differentiating patients at risk for disease progression, the researchers wrote.

Soluble TIE2 expression in bone marrow was highest in MGUS patients (median 4003.97 pg/mL) in comparison to relapsed or refractory disease (median 2223.26 pg/mL; P = .03) and to newly diagnosed patients with myeloma (median 861.98 pg/mL; P less than .001). A statistically significant difference among bone marrow levels of soluble TIE2 was observed for newly diagnosed patients and those with relapsed or refractory disease (P = .03).

However, soluble TIE2 in peripheral blood plasma did not differ significantly in the three cohorts nor did it differ between patients and controls.

In contrast to TIE2 and FLT3-L, levels of endostatin were lowest (median 146.50 ng/mL) in bone marrow plasma samples of patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Levels were higher in MGUS patients (median 190.37 mg/dL) than in newly diagnosed myeloma patients (median 170.15 mg/mL; P = .5).

Similar to soluble TIE2, plasma levels of endostatin in peripheral blood did not differ significantly in the three patient cohorts. Measurements of endostatin in bone marrow and peripheral blood correlated significantly (P less than .001), and peripheral blood levels differed significantly (P less than .001) for patients and control persons.

Osteoactivin expression was highest in the MGUS cohort, with median bone marrow plasma levels of 36 ng/mL as compared with median levels of 24.92 ng/mL in newly diagnosed myeloma patients and 22.30 ng/mL in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma. Osteoactivin levels in peripheral blood did not differ significantly in the three cohorts, but differed between patients and control subjects. Osteoactivin measures in bone marrow and peripheral blood correlated significantly.

Citation: Steiner N, et al. High levels of FLT3-ligand in bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients with advanced multiple myeloma. PLoS ONE 2017 Jul 20;12:e0181487. doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181487.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM PLOS ONE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: FLT3-L could be useful as a marker to identify patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Major finding:
There was a 61% probability that patients with FLT3-L levels above 92 pg/mL in bone marrow had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and a 79% probability that those with FLT3-L levels of 92 pg/mL or less had not relapsed and were not refractory.

Data source: A study of 14 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, 42 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, and 27 patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma, plus 16 control subjects.

Disclosures: The study was not sponsored, and the authors had no relevant disclosures.

Citation: Steiner N, et al. High levels of FLT3-ligand in bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients with advanced multiple myeloma. PLoS ONE 2017 Jul 20;12:e0181487. doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181487

Disqus Comments
Default

Modifiable risk factors account for most of the dementia risk imposed by low socioeconomic status

Article Type
Changed

 

LONDON – Twelve modifiable risk factors appear to account for more than half of the variation in dementia risk associated with socioeconomic status.

When integrated into an 18-point risk score, dubbed the “Lifestyle for Brain Health” (LIBRA) index, they accurately predicted dementia risk in more than 6,300 subjects who were followed for 7 years: Dementia risk increased by 30% for every 1-point increase on the LIBRA score, Sebastian Koehler, PhD, said at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference.

Dr. Sebastian Koehler
Although LIBRA could now be used as a cohort stratification tool in prevention studies, its highest value may lie in its overall message, said Dr. Koehler of Maastricht (the Netherlands) University: Dementia is a preventable disease.

According to Public Health England, 52% of citizens choose dementia prevention as a top health priority, but almost the same number believe that “there is nothing anyone can do to reduce their risk of getting dementia.” The LIBRA score could be employed as a public health measure to counteract that misunderstanding, he said.

“We can reduce the gap in risk that’s related to low socioeconomic status by improving health in that group. But we know that public health measures and messages are taken up much better by those with higher socioeconomic status. We think the first step is to raise awareness among this group that there is something we can do about dementia risk. And then we can reach out to this vulnerable group and design measures and messages that speak to both their needs and their resources.”

The 12 risk and protective factors were originally identified by epidemiologist Kay Deckers of Maastricht University, who drew them from a large meta-analysis published in 2015 (Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;30[3]:234-46).

They are the following:

• Diabetes.

• Hypertension.

• High cholesterol.

• Smoking.

• Obesity.

• Physical inactivity.

• Depression.

• Coronary heart disease.

• Kidney disease.

• Diet.

• Alcohol.

• Mental activity.

Dr. Koehler and his colleagues used them to create the weighted LIBRA score, which computes an 18-point risk level ranging from –5.9 (lower risk) to 12.7 (higher risk). Among the factors that reduce dementia risk are high cognitive activity, healthy diet or Mediterranean diet, and low-moderate alcohol intake. The others all increased risk. Each of the factors was assigned a point value based on its percentage of risk reduction or increase. For example, high cognitive activity reduced risk by more than 3 points, but depression increased it by 2 points. The investigators then validated this score on 6,346 participants in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, who were followed for up to 7 years.

Dr. Koehler’s study, however, was not just a LIBRA validation study. He wanted to correlate these protective and endangering factors with each subject’s socioeconomic status, and determine how much of the risk difference generally accredited to wealth was related to the LIBRA factors.

After 7 years, about 9% of the study sample developed incident dementia. These subjects were significantly older than those who didn’t (77 vs. 64 years). They were more likely to have lower education attainment (58% vs. 37%), and more likely to be poor (44% vs. 29%).

On the LIBRA risk factors, the participants who developed dementia were significantly more likely to have heart disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and depression, although not significantly more likely to be obese or to smoke.

On the LIBRA protective factors, they were significantly less likely to be low-moderate alcohol users (37% vs. 57%), to have high cognitive activity (17% vs. 45%), and significantly more likely to be physically inactive (59% vs. 24%).

Two survival curves compared the incidence of dementia related to wealth and LIBRA score. Subjects of low socioeconomic status experienced an increase in dementia risk very similar to those with high LIBRA scores. Dr. Koehler also conducted three analyses that examined the effects of wealth on dementia risk: the total effect of wealth, the direct effect of wealth, and what he called the “indirect wealth effect.” This examined the impact of wealth on LIBRA scores, followed by the effect of these scores on dementia risk.

This final model concluded that 56% of the risk imposed by low socioeconomic status was actually attributable to LIBRA scores. In other words, low socioeconomic status was directly tied to both increases in physical and mental risk factors, and decreases in physical and mental protective factors.

“Health inequalities influencing dementia risk exist because of socioeconomic differences between people,” Dr. Koehler said. “People with less wealth have a higher frequency of being exposed to risk factors for dementia that are potentially treatable.”

The LIBRA study is part of a larger dementia prevention study called Innovative, Midlife Intervention for Dementia Deterrence (In-MINDD). Dr. Koehler had no financial disclosures.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

LONDON – Twelve modifiable risk factors appear to account for more than half of the variation in dementia risk associated with socioeconomic status.

When integrated into an 18-point risk score, dubbed the “Lifestyle for Brain Health” (LIBRA) index, they accurately predicted dementia risk in more than 6,300 subjects who were followed for 7 years: Dementia risk increased by 30% for every 1-point increase on the LIBRA score, Sebastian Koehler, PhD, said at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference.

Dr. Sebastian Koehler
Although LIBRA could now be used as a cohort stratification tool in prevention studies, its highest value may lie in its overall message, said Dr. Koehler of Maastricht (the Netherlands) University: Dementia is a preventable disease.

According to Public Health England, 52% of citizens choose dementia prevention as a top health priority, but almost the same number believe that “there is nothing anyone can do to reduce their risk of getting dementia.” The LIBRA score could be employed as a public health measure to counteract that misunderstanding, he said.

“We can reduce the gap in risk that’s related to low socioeconomic status by improving health in that group. But we know that public health measures and messages are taken up much better by those with higher socioeconomic status. We think the first step is to raise awareness among this group that there is something we can do about dementia risk. And then we can reach out to this vulnerable group and design measures and messages that speak to both their needs and their resources.”

The 12 risk and protective factors were originally identified by epidemiologist Kay Deckers of Maastricht University, who drew them from a large meta-analysis published in 2015 (Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;30[3]:234-46).

They are the following:

• Diabetes.

• Hypertension.

• High cholesterol.

• Smoking.

• Obesity.

• Physical inactivity.

• Depression.

• Coronary heart disease.

• Kidney disease.

• Diet.

• Alcohol.

• Mental activity.

Dr. Koehler and his colleagues used them to create the weighted LIBRA score, which computes an 18-point risk level ranging from –5.9 (lower risk) to 12.7 (higher risk). Among the factors that reduce dementia risk are high cognitive activity, healthy diet or Mediterranean diet, and low-moderate alcohol intake. The others all increased risk. Each of the factors was assigned a point value based on its percentage of risk reduction or increase. For example, high cognitive activity reduced risk by more than 3 points, but depression increased it by 2 points. The investigators then validated this score on 6,346 participants in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, who were followed for up to 7 years.

Dr. Koehler’s study, however, was not just a LIBRA validation study. He wanted to correlate these protective and endangering factors with each subject’s socioeconomic status, and determine how much of the risk difference generally accredited to wealth was related to the LIBRA factors.

After 7 years, about 9% of the study sample developed incident dementia. These subjects were significantly older than those who didn’t (77 vs. 64 years). They were more likely to have lower education attainment (58% vs. 37%), and more likely to be poor (44% vs. 29%).

On the LIBRA risk factors, the participants who developed dementia were significantly more likely to have heart disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and depression, although not significantly more likely to be obese or to smoke.

On the LIBRA protective factors, they were significantly less likely to be low-moderate alcohol users (37% vs. 57%), to have high cognitive activity (17% vs. 45%), and significantly more likely to be physically inactive (59% vs. 24%).

Two survival curves compared the incidence of dementia related to wealth and LIBRA score. Subjects of low socioeconomic status experienced an increase in dementia risk very similar to those with high LIBRA scores. Dr. Koehler also conducted three analyses that examined the effects of wealth on dementia risk: the total effect of wealth, the direct effect of wealth, and what he called the “indirect wealth effect.” This examined the impact of wealth on LIBRA scores, followed by the effect of these scores on dementia risk.

This final model concluded that 56% of the risk imposed by low socioeconomic status was actually attributable to LIBRA scores. In other words, low socioeconomic status was directly tied to both increases in physical and mental risk factors, and decreases in physical and mental protective factors.

“Health inequalities influencing dementia risk exist because of socioeconomic differences between people,” Dr. Koehler said. “People with less wealth have a higher frequency of being exposed to risk factors for dementia that are potentially treatable.”

The LIBRA study is part of a larger dementia prevention study called Innovative, Midlife Intervention for Dementia Deterrence (In-MINDD). Dr. Koehler had no financial disclosures.

 

 

 

LONDON – Twelve modifiable risk factors appear to account for more than half of the variation in dementia risk associated with socioeconomic status.

When integrated into an 18-point risk score, dubbed the “Lifestyle for Brain Health” (LIBRA) index, they accurately predicted dementia risk in more than 6,300 subjects who were followed for 7 years: Dementia risk increased by 30% for every 1-point increase on the LIBRA score, Sebastian Koehler, PhD, said at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference.

Dr. Sebastian Koehler
Although LIBRA could now be used as a cohort stratification tool in prevention studies, its highest value may lie in its overall message, said Dr. Koehler of Maastricht (the Netherlands) University: Dementia is a preventable disease.

According to Public Health England, 52% of citizens choose dementia prevention as a top health priority, but almost the same number believe that “there is nothing anyone can do to reduce their risk of getting dementia.” The LIBRA score could be employed as a public health measure to counteract that misunderstanding, he said.

“We can reduce the gap in risk that’s related to low socioeconomic status by improving health in that group. But we know that public health measures and messages are taken up much better by those with higher socioeconomic status. We think the first step is to raise awareness among this group that there is something we can do about dementia risk. And then we can reach out to this vulnerable group and design measures and messages that speak to both their needs and their resources.”

The 12 risk and protective factors were originally identified by epidemiologist Kay Deckers of Maastricht University, who drew them from a large meta-analysis published in 2015 (Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;30[3]:234-46).

They are the following:

• Diabetes.

• Hypertension.

• High cholesterol.

• Smoking.

• Obesity.

• Physical inactivity.

• Depression.

• Coronary heart disease.

• Kidney disease.

• Diet.

• Alcohol.

• Mental activity.

Dr. Koehler and his colleagues used them to create the weighted LIBRA score, which computes an 18-point risk level ranging from –5.9 (lower risk) to 12.7 (higher risk). Among the factors that reduce dementia risk are high cognitive activity, healthy diet or Mediterranean diet, and low-moderate alcohol intake. The others all increased risk. Each of the factors was assigned a point value based on its percentage of risk reduction or increase. For example, high cognitive activity reduced risk by more than 3 points, but depression increased it by 2 points. The investigators then validated this score on 6,346 participants in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, who were followed for up to 7 years.

Dr. Koehler’s study, however, was not just a LIBRA validation study. He wanted to correlate these protective and endangering factors with each subject’s socioeconomic status, and determine how much of the risk difference generally accredited to wealth was related to the LIBRA factors.

After 7 years, about 9% of the study sample developed incident dementia. These subjects were significantly older than those who didn’t (77 vs. 64 years). They were more likely to have lower education attainment (58% vs. 37%), and more likely to be poor (44% vs. 29%).

On the LIBRA risk factors, the participants who developed dementia were significantly more likely to have heart disease, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and depression, although not significantly more likely to be obese or to smoke.

On the LIBRA protective factors, they were significantly less likely to be low-moderate alcohol users (37% vs. 57%), to have high cognitive activity (17% vs. 45%), and significantly more likely to be physically inactive (59% vs. 24%).

Two survival curves compared the incidence of dementia related to wealth and LIBRA score. Subjects of low socioeconomic status experienced an increase in dementia risk very similar to those with high LIBRA scores. Dr. Koehler also conducted three analyses that examined the effects of wealth on dementia risk: the total effect of wealth, the direct effect of wealth, and what he called the “indirect wealth effect.” This examined the impact of wealth on LIBRA scores, followed by the effect of these scores on dementia risk.

This final model concluded that 56% of the risk imposed by low socioeconomic status was actually attributable to LIBRA scores. In other words, low socioeconomic status was directly tied to both increases in physical and mental risk factors, and decreases in physical and mental protective factors.

“Health inequalities influencing dementia risk exist because of socioeconomic differences between people,” Dr. Koehler said. “People with less wealth have a higher frequency of being exposed to risk factors for dementia that are potentially treatable.”

The LIBRA study is part of a larger dementia prevention study called Innovative, Midlife Intervention for Dementia Deterrence (In-MINDD). Dr. Koehler had no financial disclosures.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AAIC 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Twelve modifiable health and lifestyle factors are the main drivers of dementia risk associated with low SES.

Major finding: The factors accounted for 56% of the risk imposed by low SES.

Data source: The LIBRA validation study comprised more than 6,300 subjects.

Disclosures: The LIBRA study is part of a larger dementia prevention study called In-MINDD. Dr. Koehler had no financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default

Abiraterone plus ADT boosts prostate cancer survival

‘Impressive and positive clinical trial results’
Article Type
Changed

 

In findings that are being hailed as practice changing, men with metastatic prostate cancer had a near 40% lower risk of death when they were treated with a combination of abiraterone acetate (Zytiga), androgen deprivation therapy, and prednisone or prednisolone, compared with ADT alone.

After a median follow-up of 30.4 months, median overall survival for men with newly diagnosed metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with ADT plus dual placebos was 34.7 months, vs. not reached for men treated with ADT, abiraterone, and prednisone in the LATITUDE trial. Similarly, in the STAMPEDE trial, men with newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic disease who were randomized to ADT with abiraterone and prednisolone had a 37% reduction in their risk for death and a 79% reduction in their risk for treatment failure, compared with men randomized to ADT alone.

roobcio/Thinkstock.com
Both studies were published on July 27 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The majority of men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer who are started on androgen deprivation therapy with a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) analog with or without a first-generation androgen receptor inhibitor will have responses to therapy, but within a median of 1-year most will progress to castration-resistant disease, noted Karim Fizazi, MD, from the Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute at the University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France, and coinvestigators of the LATITUDE trial.

“Resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy is largely driven by the reactivation of androgen receptor signaling through persistent adrenal androgen production, upregulation of intratumoral testosterone production, modification of the biologic characteristics of androgen receptors, and steroidogenic parallel pathways,” they wrote.

Although ADT and docetaxel is the standard of care for men with metastatic castration-sensitive disease who are eligible for chemotherapy, data from real-world practice suggest that patients with this presentation are older than those enrolled in clinical trials, and may not be able to tolerate the toxicities that occur when docetaxel is added to ADT, they noted.

Abiraterone, in combination with prednisone, has been shown to increase overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have not undergone chemotherapy, and among patients who had previously been treated with docetaxel.

The drug is thought to exert its antitumor effects through a combination of androgen receptor antagonism and blockade of steroidogenic enzymes, the investigators wrote.

The LATITUDE trial

LATITUDE investigators from 235 sites in 34 countries in Europe, Asia/Pacific, Latin America and Canada enrolled 1,199 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and randomly assigned them to receive either abiraterone and prednisone plus ADT (597 patients), or ADT plus dual placebos (602).

At a planned interim analysis at a median follow-up of 30.4 months, after 406 patients had died, median OS, a co-primary end point, had not been reached among patients in the abiraterone group, compared with 34.7 months for patients assigned to ADT/placebo. This difference translates into a hazard ratio for death of 0.62 (P less than .001).

The median duration of radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), the other primary end point, was 33.0 months among patients treated with abiraterone vs. 14.8 months for those treated with placebo (HR for disease progression or death, 0.47; P less than .001)

Abiraterone was also associated with significantly better outcomes in all secondary endpoints, including time until pain progression, subsequent therapy, initiation of chemotherapy, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (P less than .001 for each comparison).

The frequency of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was 12% for patients in the abiraterone group vs. 10% for those in the placebo group. Rates of grade 3 or 4 hypertension and hypokalemia were higher among patients who received abiraterone.

Based on the trial results, the independent data and safety monitoring committee unanimously recommended unblinding of the trial and allowing patients in the placebo group to receive abiraterone.

The STAMPEDE trial

The STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trial was designed to test whether adding other therapies to ADT can improve OS in the first-line setting for men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.

 

 

Body

 

The LATITUDE and STAMPEDE research teams report encouraging improvements in the initial treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. Metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer is diagnosed in a small proportion of men with prostate cancer at initial presentation and is disproportionately represented in lethal prostate cancer. The findings of these two trials suggest that therapeutically relevant biologic features of this form of cancer are shared with castration-resistant prostate cancer and raise the broader question of whether earlier application of approved life-prolonging therapies will further improve outcomes.

The reports support the hypothesis that more complete suppression of androgen signaling with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist lengthens survival of men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. The findings are in line with the efficacy of abiraterone plus LHRH agonist therapy as a preoperative treatment. Confidence in the conclusion stems from the observation that treatment with abiraterone plus an LHRH agonist was superior to an LHRH agonist alone in these two large studies among patients with distant metastases, including those with nonosseous visceral metastases. The reported toxic effects of the combination therapy relative to those observed with the LHRH agonist alone did not adversely affect outcomes. The findings may extend to second-generation androgen-receptor inhibitors or combinations with abiraterone currently under study. This practice-changing evidence supports the conclusion that men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, particularly those with more than three bone metastases on conventional imaging, should be treated with abiraterone plus an LHRH agonist.

Christopher J. Logothetis, MD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. This comment is excerpted from an editorial accompanying the studies (N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1704992).

Publications
Topics
Sections
Body

 

The LATITUDE and STAMPEDE research teams report encouraging improvements in the initial treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. Metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer is diagnosed in a small proportion of men with prostate cancer at initial presentation and is disproportionately represented in lethal prostate cancer. The findings of these two trials suggest that therapeutically relevant biologic features of this form of cancer are shared with castration-resistant prostate cancer and raise the broader question of whether earlier application of approved life-prolonging therapies will further improve outcomes.

The reports support the hypothesis that more complete suppression of androgen signaling with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist lengthens survival of men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. The findings are in line with the efficacy of abiraterone plus LHRH agonist therapy as a preoperative treatment. Confidence in the conclusion stems from the observation that treatment with abiraterone plus an LHRH agonist was superior to an LHRH agonist alone in these two large studies among patients with distant metastases, including those with nonosseous visceral metastases. The reported toxic effects of the combination therapy relative to those observed with the LHRH agonist alone did not adversely affect outcomes. The findings may extend to second-generation androgen-receptor inhibitors or combinations with abiraterone currently under study. This practice-changing evidence supports the conclusion that men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, particularly those with more than three bone metastases on conventional imaging, should be treated with abiraterone plus an LHRH agonist.

Christopher J. Logothetis, MD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. This comment is excerpted from an editorial accompanying the studies (N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1704992).

Body

 

The LATITUDE and STAMPEDE research teams report encouraging improvements in the initial treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer. Metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer is diagnosed in a small proportion of men with prostate cancer at initial presentation and is disproportionately represented in lethal prostate cancer. The findings of these two trials suggest that therapeutically relevant biologic features of this form of cancer are shared with castration-resistant prostate cancer and raise the broader question of whether earlier application of approved life-prolonging therapies will further improve outcomes.

The reports support the hypothesis that more complete suppression of androgen signaling with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist lengthens survival of men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. The findings are in line with the efficacy of abiraterone plus LHRH agonist therapy as a preoperative treatment. Confidence in the conclusion stems from the observation that treatment with abiraterone plus an LHRH agonist was superior to an LHRH agonist alone in these two large studies among patients with distant metastases, including those with nonosseous visceral metastases. The reported toxic effects of the combination therapy relative to those observed with the LHRH agonist alone did not adversely affect outcomes. The findings may extend to second-generation androgen-receptor inhibitors or combinations with abiraterone currently under study. This practice-changing evidence supports the conclusion that men with metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer, particularly those with more than three bone metastases on conventional imaging, should be treated with abiraterone plus an LHRH agonist.

Christopher J. Logothetis, MD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. This comment is excerpted from an editorial accompanying the studies (N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1704992).

Title
‘Impressive and positive clinical trial results’
‘Impressive and positive clinical trial results’

 

In findings that are being hailed as practice changing, men with metastatic prostate cancer had a near 40% lower risk of death when they were treated with a combination of abiraterone acetate (Zytiga), androgen deprivation therapy, and prednisone or prednisolone, compared with ADT alone.

After a median follow-up of 30.4 months, median overall survival for men with newly diagnosed metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with ADT plus dual placebos was 34.7 months, vs. not reached for men treated with ADT, abiraterone, and prednisone in the LATITUDE trial. Similarly, in the STAMPEDE trial, men with newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic disease who were randomized to ADT with abiraterone and prednisolone had a 37% reduction in their risk for death and a 79% reduction in their risk for treatment failure, compared with men randomized to ADT alone.

roobcio/Thinkstock.com
Both studies were published on July 27 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The majority of men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer who are started on androgen deprivation therapy with a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) analog with or without a first-generation androgen receptor inhibitor will have responses to therapy, but within a median of 1-year most will progress to castration-resistant disease, noted Karim Fizazi, MD, from the Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute at the University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France, and coinvestigators of the LATITUDE trial.

“Resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy is largely driven by the reactivation of androgen receptor signaling through persistent adrenal androgen production, upregulation of intratumoral testosterone production, modification of the biologic characteristics of androgen receptors, and steroidogenic parallel pathways,” they wrote.

Although ADT and docetaxel is the standard of care for men with metastatic castration-sensitive disease who are eligible for chemotherapy, data from real-world practice suggest that patients with this presentation are older than those enrolled in clinical trials, and may not be able to tolerate the toxicities that occur when docetaxel is added to ADT, they noted.

Abiraterone, in combination with prednisone, has been shown to increase overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have not undergone chemotherapy, and among patients who had previously been treated with docetaxel.

The drug is thought to exert its antitumor effects through a combination of androgen receptor antagonism and blockade of steroidogenic enzymes, the investigators wrote.

The LATITUDE trial

LATITUDE investigators from 235 sites in 34 countries in Europe, Asia/Pacific, Latin America and Canada enrolled 1,199 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and randomly assigned them to receive either abiraterone and prednisone plus ADT (597 patients), or ADT plus dual placebos (602).

At a planned interim analysis at a median follow-up of 30.4 months, after 406 patients had died, median OS, a co-primary end point, had not been reached among patients in the abiraterone group, compared with 34.7 months for patients assigned to ADT/placebo. This difference translates into a hazard ratio for death of 0.62 (P less than .001).

The median duration of radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), the other primary end point, was 33.0 months among patients treated with abiraterone vs. 14.8 months for those treated with placebo (HR for disease progression or death, 0.47; P less than .001)

Abiraterone was also associated with significantly better outcomes in all secondary endpoints, including time until pain progression, subsequent therapy, initiation of chemotherapy, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (P less than .001 for each comparison).

The frequency of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was 12% for patients in the abiraterone group vs. 10% for those in the placebo group. Rates of grade 3 or 4 hypertension and hypokalemia were higher among patients who received abiraterone.

Based on the trial results, the independent data and safety monitoring committee unanimously recommended unblinding of the trial and allowing patients in the placebo group to receive abiraterone.

The STAMPEDE trial

The STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trial was designed to test whether adding other therapies to ADT can improve OS in the first-line setting for men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.

 

 

 

In findings that are being hailed as practice changing, men with metastatic prostate cancer had a near 40% lower risk of death when they were treated with a combination of abiraterone acetate (Zytiga), androgen deprivation therapy, and prednisone or prednisolone, compared with ADT alone.

After a median follow-up of 30.4 months, median overall survival for men with newly diagnosed metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer treated with ADT plus dual placebos was 34.7 months, vs. not reached for men treated with ADT, abiraterone, and prednisone in the LATITUDE trial. Similarly, in the STAMPEDE trial, men with newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic disease who were randomized to ADT with abiraterone and prednisolone had a 37% reduction in their risk for death and a 79% reduction in their risk for treatment failure, compared with men randomized to ADT alone.

roobcio/Thinkstock.com
Both studies were published on July 27 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The majority of men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer who are started on androgen deprivation therapy with a luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone (LHRH) analog with or without a first-generation androgen receptor inhibitor will have responses to therapy, but within a median of 1-year most will progress to castration-resistant disease, noted Karim Fizazi, MD, from the Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute at the University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France, and coinvestigators of the LATITUDE trial.

“Resistance to androgen-deprivation therapy is largely driven by the reactivation of androgen receptor signaling through persistent adrenal androgen production, upregulation of intratumoral testosterone production, modification of the biologic characteristics of androgen receptors, and steroidogenic parallel pathways,” they wrote.

Although ADT and docetaxel is the standard of care for men with metastatic castration-sensitive disease who are eligible for chemotherapy, data from real-world practice suggest that patients with this presentation are older than those enrolled in clinical trials, and may not be able to tolerate the toxicities that occur when docetaxel is added to ADT, they noted.

Abiraterone, in combination with prednisone, has been shown to increase overall survival (OS) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have not undergone chemotherapy, and among patients who had previously been treated with docetaxel.

The drug is thought to exert its antitumor effects through a combination of androgen receptor antagonism and blockade of steroidogenic enzymes, the investigators wrote.

The LATITUDE trial

LATITUDE investigators from 235 sites in 34 countries in Europe, Asia/Pacific, Latin America and Canada enrolled 1,199 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and randomly assigned them to receive either abiraterone and prednisone plus ADT (597 patients), or ADT plus dual placebos (602).

At a planned interim analysis at a median follow-up of 30.4 months, after 406 patients had died, median OS, a co-primary end point, had not been reached among patients in the abiraterone group, compared with 34.7 months for patients assigned to ADT/placebo. This difference translates into a hazard ratio for death of 0.62 (P less than .001).

The median duration of radiographic progression-free survival (PFS), the other primary end point, was 33.0 months among patients treated with abiraterone vs. 14.8 months for those treated with placebo (HR for disease progression or death, 0.47; P less than .001)

Abiraterone was also associated with significantly better outcomes in all secondary endpoints, including time until pain progression, subsequent therapy, initiation of chemotherapy, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (P less than .001 for each comparison).

The frequency of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was 12% for patients in the abiraterone group vs. 10% for those in the placebo group. Rates of grade 3 or 4 hypertension and hypokalemia were higher among patients who received abiraterone.

Based on the trial results, the independent data and safety monitoring committee unanimously recommended unblinding of the trial and allowing patients in the placebo group to receive abiraterone.

The STAMPEDE trial

The STAMPEDE (Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy) trial was designed to test whether adding other therapies to ADT can improve OS in the first-line setting for men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Adding abiraterone acetate to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly improved overall survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

Major finding: The hazard ratio for death with abiraterone/ADT vs. ADT alone in LATITUDE was 0.62, and in STAMPEDE was 0.63.

Data source: Randomized LATITUDE study in 1,199 men with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Randomized STAMPEDE trial in 1,917 patients with newly diagnosed node-positive or metastatic prostate cancer, high-risk locally advanced disease, or relapsed, high-risk disease.

Disclosures: LATITUDE was supported by Janssen Research and Development. Dr. Fizazi reported having no relevant conflicts of interest. Multiple coauthors reported personal fees or other support from Janssen and other companies. STAMPEDE was supported by Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council, Astellas Pharma, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis. Lead author Nicholas D. James, PhD, reports receiving support, fees, grants and/or other considerations from Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Clovis Oncology, and Sanofi-Aventis. Multiple coauthors reported similar relationships with various entities.

Disqus Comments
Default

Developments in celiac disease and wheat-sensitivity disorders

Article Type
Changed

 

Celiac disease remained a rare disease until this century. “When I went to medical school, people from Ireland, the Netherlands, and other Northern Europeans had celiac disease. The prevalence of celiac disease has increased in the United States and worldwide.

AGA Institute
Dr. Sheila Crowe
The clinical expression of celiac disease has also changed over time. “In the past century, celiac disease was an overt malabsorptive condition with diarrhea, a low body mass index, bone disease, malnutrition, infertility, and anemia but atypical celiac disease is now common, with non-GI presentations including neurological problems, depression, and migraines. Many patients also lack an overt clinical manifestation – the so-called “silent celiac disase,” which is often detected during screening of first-degree relatives and other at-risk patients.

Advances have been made in the understanding of celiac disease pathogenesis over the past few decades regarding the host genotype, currently restricted to the HLA genes, the delivery mode of gluten, type of feeding, time of feeding, and possibly antibiotics modulating the microbiome. The DQ2 genes are necessary but are insufficient to explain the development of celiac disease. About 40% of the burden of celiac disease is related to the HLA-DQ2.2, 2.5, and 8 genes. In spite of many genomewide association studies, no key molecules have been identified that play a significant role in causing the disease to date.

The association of enteric infections and celiac disease may explain why genetically susceptible individuals that are exposed to gluten from childhood do not all develop the disease in early childhood. The average age of diagnosis of celiac disease in modern times is the mid-40s, and the individuals have been eating gluten all their lives, so it’s not clear why and when people develop celiac disease. It has been postulated that enteric infection could modulate the immune system, cause breaches in the mucosal barrier, and alters of the microbiome, thus triggering the disease. A study recently published in Science supports the role of reovirus as a trigger for celiac disease and results from the TEDDY study group published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology suggest that rotavirus vaccination could reduce celiac disease autoimmunity in susceptible children.

While the mechanisms underlying nonceliac gluten sensitivity or wheat sensitivity are still unclear, the terms “encompass individuals who report symptoms or alterations in health that are related to perceived gluten or wheat ingestion.” These symptoms could stem from fructose or fructans in wheat starch (FODMAPs), which could lead to symptoms similar to irritable bowel syndrome or other functional GI disorders. North American data show that more and more people without a diagnosis of celiac disease are consuming gluten-free products. Researchers have postulated that the pathophysiology of these conditions could include activation of the innate immune system, increased permeability, mucosal inflammation, basophil and eosinophil activation, antigliadin antibody elevation, and wheat amyloid trypsin inhibitors, but data have been inconsistent. The recommendation for diagnosing nonceliac gluten or wheat sensitivity is a double-blind placebo-controlled gluten trial to assess gluten-induced symptoms after excluding celiac disease or wheat allergy, but this testing is rarely available in North America. A recent study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology demonstrated the limitations of this testing. The gluten-free diet is now very popular, but some drawbacks have emerged. These include an increased risk for cardiovascular disorders linked to the diet according to a recent study published in BMJ, and increased levels of heavy metals in urine and blood found in insecticide used on rice, according to a recent study published in Epidemiology. Further studies are needed to corroborate these recall diet studies.
 

Dr. Crowe is a clinical professor of medicine in the department of gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego. She reports financial relationships with UpToDate, Ferring, and Otsuka. She made her comments during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Celiac disease remained a rare disease until this century. “When I went to medical school, people from Ireland, the Netherlands, and other Northern Europeans had celiac disease. The prevalence of celiac disease has increased in the United States and worldwide.

AGA Institute
Dr. Sheila Crowe
The clinical expression of celiac disease has also changed over time. “In the past century, celiac disease was an overt malabsorptive condition with diarrhea, a low body mass index, bone disease, malnutrition, infertility, and anemia but atypical celiac disease is now common, with non-GI presentations including neurological problems, depression, and migraines. Many patients also lack an overt clinical manifestation – the so-called “silent celiac disase,” which is often detected during screening of first-degree relatives and other at-risk patients.

Advances have been made in the understanding of celiac disease pathogenesis over the past few decades regarding the host genotype, currently restricted to the HLA genes, the delivery mode of gluten, type of feeding, time of feeding, and possibly antibiotics modulating the microbiome. The DQ2 genes are necessary but are insufficient to explain the development of celiac disease. About 40% of the burden of celiac disease is related to the HLA-DQ2.2, 2.5, and 8 genes. In spite of many genomewide association studies, no key molecules have been identified that play a significant role in causing the disease to date.

The association of enteric infections and celiac disease may explain why genetically susceptible individuals that are exposed to gluten from childhood do not all develop the disease in early childhood. The average age of diagnosis of celiac disease in modern times is the mid-40s, and the individuals have been eating gluten all their lives, so it’s not clear why and when people develop celiac disease. It has been postulated that enteric infection could modulate the immune system, cause breaches in the mucosal barrier, and alters of the microbiome, thus triggering the disease. A study recently published in Science supports the role of reovirus as a trigger for celiac disease and results from the TEDDY study group published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology suggest that rotavirus vaccination could reduce celiac disease autoimmunity in susceptible children.

While the mechanisms underlying nonceliac gluten sensitivity or wheat sensitivity are still unclear, the terms “encompass individuals who report symptoms or alterations in health that are related to perceived gluten or wheat ingestion.” These symptoms could stem from fructose or fructans in wheat starch (FODMAPs), which could lead to symptoms similar to irritable bowel syndrome or other functional GI disorders. North American data show that more and more people without a diagnosis of celiac disease are consuming gluten-free products. Researchers have postulated that the pathophysiology of these conditions could include activation of the innate immune system, increased permeability, mucosal inflammation, basophil and eosinophil activation, antigliadin antibody elevation, and wheat amyloid trypsin inhibitors, but data have been inconsistent. The recommendation for diagnosing nonceliac gluten or wheat sensitivity is a double-blind placebo-controlled gluten trial to assess gluten-induced symptoms after excluding celiac disease or wheat allergy, but this testing is rarely available in North America. A recent study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology demonstrated the limitations of this testing. The gluten-free diet is now very popular, but some drawbacks have emerged. These include an increased risk for cardiovascular disorders linked to the diet according to a recent study published in BMJ, and increased levels of heavy metals in urine and blood found in insecticide used on rice, according to a recent study published in Epidemiology. Further studies are needed to corroborate these recall diet studies.
 

Dr. Crowe is a clinical professor of medicine in the department of gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego. She reports financial relationships with UpToDate, Ferring, and Otsuka. She made her comments during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.

 

Celiac disease remained a rare disease until this century. “When I went to medical school, people from Ireland, the Netherlands, and other Northern Europeans had celiac disease. The prevalence of celiac disease has increased in the United States and worldwide.

AGA Institute
Dr. Sheila Crowe
The clinical expression of celiac disease has also changed over time. “In the past century, celiac disease was an overt malabsorptive condition with diarrhea, a low body mass index, bone disease, malnutrition, infertility, and anemia but atypical celiac disease is now common, with non-GI presentations including neurological problems, depression, and migraines. Many patients also lack an overt clinical manifestation – the so-called “silent celiac disase,” which is often detected during screening of first-degree relatives and other at-risk patients.

Advances have been made in the understanding of celiac disease pathogenesis over the past few decades regarding the host genotype, currently restricted to the HLA genes, the delivery mode of gluten, type of feeding, time of feeding, and possibly antibiotics modulating the microbiome. The DQ2 genes are necessary but are insufficient to explain the development of celiac disease. About 40% of the burden of celiac disease is related to the HLA-DQ2.2, 2.5, and 8 genes. In spite of many genomewide association studies, no key molecules have been identified that play a significant role in causing the disease to date.

The association of enteric infections and celiac disease may explain why genetically susceptible individuals that are exposed to gluten from childhood do not all develop the disease in early childhood. The average age of diagnosis of celiac disease in modern times is the mid-40s, and the individuals have been eating gluten all their lives, so it’s not clear why and when people develop celiac disease. It has been postulated that enteric infection could modulate the immune system, cause breaches in the mucosal barrier, and alters of the microbiome, thus triggering the disease. A study recently published in Science supports the role of reovirus as a trigger for celiac disease and results from the TEDDY study group published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology suggest that rotavirus vaccination could reduce celiac disease autoimmunity in susceptible children.

While the mechanisms underlying nonceliac gluten sensitivity or wheat sensitivity are still unclear, the terms “encompass individuals who report symptoms or alterations in health that are related to perceived gluten or wheat ingestion.” These symptoms could stem from fructose or fructans in wheat starch (FODMAPs), which could lead to symptoms similar to irritable bowel syndrome or other functional GI disorders. North American data show that more and more people without a diagnosis of celiac disease are consuming gluten-free products. Researchers have postulated that the pathophysiology of these conditions could include activation of the innate immune system, increased permeability, mucosal inflammation, basophil and eosinophil activation, antigliadin antibody elevation, and wheat amyloid trypsin inhibitors, but data have been inconsistent. The recommendation for diagnosing nonceliac gluten or wheat sensitivity is a double-blind placebo-controlled gluten trial to assess gluten-induced symptoms after excluding celiac disease or wheat allergy, but this testing is rarely available in North America. A recent study published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology demonstrated the limitations of this testing. The gluten-free diet is now very popular, but some drawbacks have emerged. These include an increased risk for cardiovascular disorders linked to the diet according to a recent study published in BMJ, and increased levels of heavy metals in urine and blood found in insecticide used on rice, according to a recent study published in Epidemiology. Further studies are needed to corroborate these recall diet studies.
 

Dr. Crowe is a clinical professor of medicine in the department of gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego. She reports financial relationships with UpToDate, Ferring, and Otsuka. She made her comments during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

NLR useful for predicting 1-year mortality in PBC patients

Article Type
Changed

 

An elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with a poor 1-year mortality rate in hospitalized primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, according to Lin Lin, MD, of Tianjin (China) Medical University General Hospital and the Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases and associates.

A retrospective analysis of 88 PBC patients hospitalized between June 2009 and January 2014 was performed for the study. NLR was a significant predictor of survival, with an odds ratio of 1.5, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 67.1%. A baseline NLR value of 2.18 was selected as the cutoff for 1-year mortality. Of the 33 patients above this value at initial hospitalization, 6 died, whereas none of the 55 patients below this value died.

The results of the retrospective study were confirmed in a prospective 1-year cohort that included 63 people with PBC. The patients with a baseline NLR of less than 2.18 had significantly longer survival times than those who had a baseline NLR of 2.18 or higher.

“NLR – an affordable, widely available and reproducible index – is closely related to short-term mortality in patients with PBC. Further studies are warranted to externally cross-validate our findings in other populations,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full study in BMJ Open (2017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015304).
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

An elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with a poor 1-year mortality rate in hospitalized primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, according to Lin Lin, MD, of Tianjin (China) Medical University General Hospital and the Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases and associates.

A retrospective analysis of 88 PBC patients hospitalized between June 2009 and January 2014 was performed for the study. NLR was a significant predictor of survival, with an odds ratio of 1.5, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 67.1%. A baseline NLR value of 2.18 was selected as the cutoff for 1-year mortality. Of the 33 patients above this value at initial hospitalization, 6 died, whereas none of the 55 patients below this value died.

The results of the retrospective study were confirmed in a prospective 1-year cohort that included 63 people with PBC. The patients with a baseline NLR of less than 2.18 had significantly longer survival times than those who had a baseline NLR of 2.18 or higher.

“NLR – an affordable, widely available and reproducible index – is closely related to short-term mortality in patients with PBC. Further studies are warranted to externally cross-validate our findings in other populations,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full study in BMJ Open (2017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015304).
 

 

An elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was associated with a poor 1-year mortality rate in hospitalized primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, according to Lin Lin, MD, of Tianjin (China) Medical University General Hospital and the Tianjin Institute of Digestive Diseases and associates.

A retrospective analysis of 88 PBC patients hospitalized between June 2009 and January 2014 was performed for the study. NLR was a significant predictor of survival, with an odds ratio of 1.5, a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 67.1%. A baseline NLR value of 2.18 was selected as the cutoff for 1-year mortality. Of the 33 patients above this value at initial hospitalization, 6 died, whereas none of the 55 patients below this value died.

The results of the retrospective study were confirmed in a prospective 1-year cohort that included 63 people with PBC. The patients with a baseline NLR of less than 2.18 had significantly longer survival times than those who had a baseline NLR of 2.18 or higher.

“NLR – an affordable, widely available and reproducible index – is closely related to short-term mortality in patients with PBC. Further studies are warranted to externally cross-validate our findings in other populations,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full study in BMJ Open (2017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015304).
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM BMJ OPEN

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

VA cohort study: Individualize SSI prophylaxis based on patient factors

Article Type
Changed

 

The combined use of vancomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for prophylaxis against surgical site infections is associated with both benefits and harms, according to findings from a national propensity-score–adjusted retrospective cohort study.

For example, the combination treatment reduced surgical site infections (SSIs) 30 days after cardiac surgical procedures but increased the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in some patients, Westyn Branch-Elliman, MD, of the VA Boston Healthcare System and her colleagues reported online July 10 in PLOS Medicine.

Janice Haney Carr/CDC
Magnified 20,000X, this colorized scanning electron micrograph depicts a grouping of MRSA bacteria.
Of 70,101 cardiac, orthopedic joint replacement, vascular, colorectal, and hysterectomy procedures performed between Oct. 1, 2008, and Sept. 30, 2013, in a multicenter, national VA cohort, 52,504 involved use of beta-lactam–only prophylaxis, 5,089 involved vancomycin-only prophylaxis, and 12,508 involved prophylaxis with a combination of the two. There were 2,466 surgical site infections at 109 medical centers.

Among cardiac surgery patients, the incidence of surgical site infections was significantly lower for the 6,953 patients treated with both drugs vs. the 12,834 treated with a single agent (0.95% vs. 1.48%), the investigators found (PLOS Med. 2017 Jul 10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002340).

SSI benefit with combination therapy

“After controlling for age, diabetes, ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] score, mupirocin administration, current smoking status, and preoperative MRSA [methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] colonization status, receipt of combination antimicrobial prophylaxis was associated with reduced SSI risk following cardiac surgical procedures (adjusted risk ratio, 0.61),” they wrote, noting that, when combination therapy was compared with either of the agents alone, the associations were similar and that no association between SSI reduction and the combination regimen was seen for the other types of surgical procedures assessed.

Secondary analyses showed that, among the cardiac patients, differences in the rates of SSIs were seen based on MRSA status in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Among MRSA-colonized patients, SSIs occurred in 8 of 346 patients (2.3%) who received combination prophylaxis vs. 4 of 100 patients (4%) who received vancomycin alone (aRR, 0.53), and, among MRSA-negative and MRSA-unknown cardiac surgery patients, SSIs occurred in 58 of 6,607 patients (0.88%) receiving combination prophylaxis and 146 of 10,215 patients (1.4%) receiving a beta-lactam alone (aRR, 0.60).

“Among MRSA-colonized patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the associated absolute risk reduction for SSI was approximately triple that of the absolute risk reduction in MRSA-negative or -unknown patients, with a [number needed to treat] to prevent 1 SSI of 53 for the MRSA-colonized group, compared with 176 for the MRSA-negative or -unknown groups,” they wrote.

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection was similar in both exposure groups (0.72% and 0.81% with combination and single agent prophylaxis, respectively).

Higher AKI risk with combination therapy

“In contrast, combination versus single prophylaxis was associated with higher relative risk of AKI in the 7-day postoperative period after adjusting for prophylaxis regimen duration, age, diabetes, ASA score, and smoking,” they said.

The rate of AKI was 23.75% among patients receiving combination prophylaxis, compared with 20.79% and 13.93% among those receiving vancomycin alone and a beta-lactam alone, respectively.

Significant associations between absolute risk of AKI and receipt of combination regimens were seen across all types of procedures, the investigators said.

“Overall, the NNH [number needed to harm] to cause one episode of AKI in cardiac surgery patients receiving combination therapy was 22, and, for stage 3 AKI, 167. The NNH associated with one additional episode of any postoperative AKI after receipt of combination therapy was 76 following orthopedic procedures and 25 following vascular surgical procedures,” they said.

The optimal approach for preventing SSIs is unclear. Although the multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery recommend single agent prophylaxis most often, with a beta-lactam antibiotic, for most surgical procedures, the use of vancomycin alone is a consideration in MRSA-colonized patients and in centers with a high MRSA incidence, and combination prophylaxis with a beta-lactam plus vancomycin is increasing. However, the relative risks and benefit of this strategy have not been carefully studied, the investigators said.

Thus, the investigators used a propensity-adjusted, log-binomial regression model stratified by type of surgical procedure among the cases identified in the Veterans Affairs cohort to assess the association between SSIs and receipt of combination prophylaxis versus single agent prophylaxis.

Though limited by the observational study design and by factors such as a predominantly male and slightly older and more rural population, the findings suggest that “clinicians may need to individualize prophylaxis strategy based on patient-specific factors that influence the risk-versus-benefit equation,” they said, concluding that “future studies are needed to evaluate the utility of MRSA screening protocols for optimizing and individualizing surgical prophylaxis regimen.”

This study was funded by Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development. Dr. Branch-Elliman reported having no disclosures. One other author, Eli Perencevich, MD, received an investigator initiated Grant from Merck Pharmaceuticals in 2013.

 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

 

The combined use of vancomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for prophylaxis against surgical site infections is associated with both benefits and harms, according to findings from a national propensity-score–adjusted retrospective cohort study.

For example, the combination treatment reduced surgical site infections (SSIs) 30 days after cardiac surgical procedures but increased the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in some patients, Westyn Branch-Elliman, MD, of the VA Boston Healthcare System and her colleagues reported online July 10 in PLOS Medicine.

Janice Haney Carr/CDC
Magnified 20,000X, this colorized scanning electron micrograph depicts a grouping of MRSA bacteria.
Of 70,101 cardiac, orthopedic joint replacement, vascular, colorectal, and hysterectomy procedures performed between Oct. 1, 2008, and Sept. 30, 2013, in a multicenter, national VA cohort, 52,504 involved use of beta-lactam–only prophylaxis, 5,089 involved vancomycin-only prophylaxis, and 12,508 involved prophylaxis with a combination of the two. There were 2,466 surgical site infections at 109 medical centers.

Among cardiac surgery patients, the incidence of surgical site infections was significantly lower for the 6,953 patients treated with both drugs vs. the 12,834 treated with a single agent (0.95% vs. 1.48%), the investigators found (PLOS Med. 2017 Jul 10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002340).

SSI benefit with combination therapy

“After controlling for age, diabetes, ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] score, mupirocin administration, current smoking status, and preoperative MRSA [methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] colonization status, receipt of combination antimicrobial prophylaxis was associated with reduced SSI risk following cardiac surgical procedures (adjusted risk ratio, 0.61),” they wrote, noting that, when combination therapy was compared with either of the agents alone, the associations were similar and that no association between SSI reduction and the combination regimen was seen for the other types of surgical procedures assessed.

Secondary analyses showed that, among the cardiac patients, differences in the rates of SSIs were seen based on MRSA status in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Among MRSA-colonized patients, SSIs occurred in 8 of 346 patients (2.3%) who received combination prophylaxis vs. 4 of 100 patients (4%) who received vancomycin alone (aRR, 0.53), and, among MRSA-negative and MRSA-unknown cardiac surgery patients, SSIs occurred in 58 of 6,607 patients (0.88%) receiving combination prophylaxis and 146 of 10,215 patients (1.4%) receiving a beta-lactam alone (aRR, 0.60).

“Among MRSA-colonized patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the associated absolute risk reduction for SSI was approximately triple that of the absolute risk reduction in MRSA-negative or -unknown patients, with a [number needed to treat] to prevent 1 SSI of 53 for the MRSA-colonized group, compared with 176 for the MRSA-negative or -unknown groups,” they wrote.

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection was similar in both exposure groups (0.72% and 0.81% with combination and single agent prophylaxis, respectively).

Higher AKI risk with combination therapy

“In contrast, combination versus single prophylaxis was associated with higher relative risk of AKI in the 7-day postoperative period after adjusting for prophylaxis regimen duration, age, diabetes, ASA score, and smoking,” they said.

The rate of AKI was 23.75% among patients receiving combination prophylaxis, compared with 20.79% and 13.93% among those receiving vancomycin alone and a beta-lactam alone, respectively.

Significant associations between absolute risk of AKI and receipt of combination regimens were seen across all types of procedures, the investigators said.

“Overall, the NNH [number needed to harm] to cause one episode of AKI in cardiac surgery patients receiving combination therapy was 22, and, for stage 3 AKI, 167. The NNH associated with one additional episode of any postoperative AKI after receipt of combination therapy was 76 following orthopedic procedures and 25 following vascular surgical procedures,” they said.

The optimal approach for preventing SSIs is unclear. Although the multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery recommend single agent prophylaxis most often, with a beta-lactam antibiotic, for most surgical procedures, the use of vancomycin alone is a consideration in MRSA-colonized patients and in centers with a high MRSA incidence, and combination prophylaxis with a beta-lactam plus vancomycin is increasing. However, the relative risks and benefit of this strategy have not been carefully studied, the investigators said.

Thus, the investigators used a propensity-adjusted, log-binomial regression model stratified by type of surgical procedure among the cases identified in the Veterans Affairs cohort to assess the association between SSIs and receipt of combination prophylaxis versus single agent prophylaxis.

Though limited by the observational study design and by factors such as a predominantly male and slightly older and more rural population, the findings suggest that “clinicians may need to individualize prophylaxis strategy based on patient-specific factors that influence the risk-versus-benefit equation,” they said, concluding that “future studies are needed to evaluate the utility of MRSA screening protocols for optimizing and individualizing surgical prophylaxis regimen.”

This study was funded by Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development. Dr. Branch-Elliman reported having no disclosures. One other author, Eli Perencevich, MD, received an investigator initiated Grant from Merck Pharmaceuticals in 2013.

 

 

 

The combined use of vancomycin and a beta-lactam antibiotic for prophylaxis against surgical site infections is associated with both benefits and harms, according to findings from a national propensity-score–adjusted retrospective cohort study.

For example, the combination treatment reduced surgical site infections (SSIs) 30 days after cardiac surgical procedures but increased the risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in some patients, Westyn Branch-Elliman, MD, of the VA Boston Healthcare System and her colleagues reported online July 10 in PLOS Medicine.

Janice Haney Carr/CDC
Magnified 20,000X, this colorized scanning electron micrograph depicts a grouping of MRSA bacteria.
Of 70,101 cardiac, orthopedic joint replacement, vascular, colorectal, and hysterectomy procedures performed between Oct. 1, 2008, and Sept. 30, 2013, in a multicenter, national VA cohort, 52,504 involved use of beta-lactam–only prophylaxis, 5,089 involved vancomycin-only prophylaxis, and 12,508 involved prophylaxis with a combination of the two. There were 2,466 surgical site infections at 109 medical centers.

Among cardiac surgery patients, the incidence of surgical site infections was significantly lower for the 6,953 patients treated with both drugs vs. the 12,834 treated with a single agent (0.95% vs. 1.48%), the investigators found (PLOS Med. 2017 Jul 10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002340).

SSI benefit with combination therapy

“After controlling for age, diabetes, ASA [American Society of Anesthesiologists] score, mupirocin administration, current smoking status, and preoperative MRSA [methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] colonization status, receipt of combination antimicrobial prophylaxis was associated with reduced SSI risk following cardiac surgical procedures (adjusted risk ratio, 0.61),” they wrote, noting that, when combination therapy was compared with either of the agents alone, the associations were similar and that no association between SSI reduction and the combination regimen was seen for the other types of surgical procedures assessed.

Secondary analyses showed that, among the cardiac patients, differences in the rates of SSIs were seen based on MRSA status in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Among MRSA-colonized patients, SSIs occurred in 8 of 346 patients (2.3%) who received combination prophylaxis vs. 4 of 100 patients (4%) who received vancomycin alone (aRR, 0.53), and, among MRSA-negative and MRSA-unknown cardiac surgery patients, SSIs occurred in 58 of 6,607 patients (0.88%) receiving combination prophylaxis and 146 of 10,215 patients (1.4%) receiving a beta-lactam alone (aRR, 0.60).

“Among MRSA-colonized patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the associated absolute risk reduction for SSI was approximately triple that of the absolute risk reduction in MRSA-negative or -unknown patients, with a [number needed to treat] to prevent 1 SSI of 53 for the MRSA-colonized group, compared with 176 for the MRSA-negative or -unknown groups,” they wrote.

The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection was similar in both exposure groups (0.72% and 0.81% with combination and single agent prophylaxis, respectively).

Higher AKI risk with combination therapy

“In contrast, combination versus single prophylaxis was associated with higher relative risk of AKI in the 7-day postoperative period after adjusting for prophylaxis regimen duration, age, diabetes, ASA score, and smoking,” they said.

The rate of AKI was 23.75% among patients receiving combination prophylaxis, compared with 20.79% and 13.93% among those receiving vancomycin alone and a beta-lactam alone, respectively.

Significant associations between absolute risk of AKI and receipt of combination regimens were seen across all types of procedures, the investigators said.

“Overall, the NNH [number needed to harm] to cause one episode of AKI in cardiac surgery patients receiving combination therapy was 22, and, for stage 3 AKI, 167. The NNH associated with one additional episode of any postoperative AKI after receipt of combination therapy was 76 following orthopedic procedures and 25 following vascular surgical procedures,” they said.

The optimal approach for preventing SSIs is unclear. Although the multidisciplinary Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery recommend single agent prophylaxis most often, with a beta-lactam antibiotic, for most surgical procedures, the use of vancomycin alone is a consideration in MRSA-colonized patients and in centers with a high MRSA incidence, and combination prophylaxis with a beta-lactam plus vancomycin is increasing. However, the relative risks and benefit of this strategy have not been carefully studied, the investigators said.

Thus, the investigators used a propensity-adjusted, log-binomial regression model stratified by type of surgical procedure among the cases identified in the Veterans Affairs cohort to assess the association between SSIs and receipt of combination prophylaxis versus single agent prophylaxis.

Though limited by the observational study design and by factors such as a predominantly male and slightly older and more rural population, the findings suggest that “clinicians may need to individualize prophylaxis strategy based on patient-specific factors that influence the risk-versus-benefit equation,” they said, concluding that “future studies are needed to evaluate the utility of MRSA screening protocols for optimizing and individualizing surgical prophylaxis regimen.”

This study was funded by Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development. Dr. Branch-Elliman reported having no disclosures. One other author, Eli Perencevich, MD, received an investigator initiated Grant from Merck Pharmaceuticals in 2013.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM PLOS MEDICINE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Combination vancomycin/beta-lactam prophylaxis against surgical site infections is associated with both benefits and harms.

Major finding: The SSI incidence was 0.95% vs. 1.48% with combination vs. single agent–therapy in cardiac surgery patients. Acute kidney injuries occurred in 23.75% of all surgery patients receiving combination prophylaxis, compared with 20.79% and 13.93% with vancomycin or a beta-lactam, respectively.

Data source: A retrospective cohort study of more than 70,000 surgical procedures.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development. Dr. Branch-Elliman reported having no disclosures. One other author, Eli Perencevich, MD, received an investigator initiated grant from Merck Pharmaceuticals in 2013.

Disqus Comments
Default

Relamorelin for diabetic gastroparesis: Trial results

Article Type
Changed

 

Gastroparesis is defined as delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction. The cardinal symptoms are upper abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, bloating, early satiety, nausea, and, with more severe disease, vomiting. Weight loss, malnutrition, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, bezoar formation, and aspiration pneumonia may occur in advanced cases. Unfortunately, there are few approved or efficacious treatment options for diabetic gastroparesis. The 5-HT4 receptor agonist, cisapride, has been withdrawn from the prescription markets in most countries.

AGA Institute
Dr. Michael Camilleri
Relamorelin (RM-131) is a selective pentapeptide ghrelin receptor agonist with potent prokinetic properties. A prior phase 2a study showed that 10 microg b.i.d. relamorelin subcutaneously for 4 weeks had prokinetic activity and relieved symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis, especially in patients with vomiting at baseline.

The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of relamorelin on disease symptoms and gastric emptying in moderate to severe diabetic gastroparesis. In a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial, with a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in, patients were randomized to 10 microg b.i.d., 30 microg b.i.d., 100 microg b.i.d., or placebo b.i.d. Patients completed a daily e-diary of symptoms (Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary [DGSSD]: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, and bloating on a 0–10 scale) and vomiting episodes, which were summarized by treatment week. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in vomiting frequency; a key secondary endpoint was change from baseline in a four-symptom composite of DGSSD symptoms.

A longitudinal analysis over the 12-week trial showed there were reductions in nausea, postprandial fullness, abdominal pain, and bloating individually and as a composite score. Relamorelin accelerated gastric emptying T1/2 at all three doses compared with placebo. However, there were no effects on vomiting frequency, which showed a high placebo response. More hyperglycemia events and diarrhea events were observed with relamorelin treatment compared with placebo. The diarrhea reflects the previously demonstrated stimulation of colonic transit and motility and reduction of symptoms of constipation in patients with chronic constipation. The hyperglycemia likely resulted from accelerated gastric emptying rather than potential inhibition of insulin production, which has been reported with high levels of ghrelin in animal studies or with high levels of ghrelin associated with starvation.

Thus, relamorelin demonstrated substantially improved core symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis, was generally safe and well tolerated, and should be further assessed in pivotal phase 3 trials. The results in this trial suggest that there is no dose-response relationship between the three doses of relamorelin tested and that future trials of relamorelin might not need to include the 100-microg b.i.d. dose. Importantly, this study also suggests the importance to prospectively manage the hyperglycemia in future trials.

Dr. Camilleri is a faculty member in the department of gastroenterology and hepatology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. His comments were made during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Gastroparesis is defined as delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction. The cardinal symptoms are upper abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, bloating, early satiety, nausea, and, with more severe disease, vomiting. Weight loss, malnutrition, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, bezoar formation, and aspiration pneumonia may occur in advanced cases. Unfortunately, there are few approved or efficacious treatment options for diabetic gastroparesis. The 5-HT4 receptor agonist, cisapride, has been withdrawn from the prescription markets in most countries.

AGA Institute
Dr. Michael Camilleri
Relamorelin (RM-131) is a selective pentapeptide ghrelin receptor agonist with potent prokinetic properties. A prior phase 2a study showed that 10 microg b.i.d. relamorelin subcutaneously for 4 weeks had prokinetic activity and relieved symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis, especially in patients with vomiting at baseline.

The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of relamorelin on disease symptoms and gastric emptying in moderate to severe diabetic gastroparesis. In a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial, with a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in, patients were randomized to 10 microg b.i.d., 30 microg b.i.d., 100 microg b.i.d., or placebo b.i.d. Patients completed a daily e-diary of symptoms (Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary [DGSSD]: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, and bloating on a 0–10 scale) and vomiting episodes, which were summarized by treatment week. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in vomiting frequency; a key secondary endpoint was change from baseline in a four-symptom composite of DGSSD symptoms.

A longitudinal analysis over the 12-week trial showed there were reductions in nausea, postprandial fullness, abdominal pain, and bloating individually and as a composite score. Relamorelin accelerated gastric emptying T1/2 at all three doses compared with placebo. However, there were no effects on vomiting frequency, which showed a high placebo response. More hyperglycemia events and diarrhea events were observed with relamorelin treatment compared with placebo. The diarrhea reflects the previously demonstrated stimulation of colonic transit and motility and reduction of symptoms of constipation in patients with chronic constipation. The hyperglycemia likely resulted from accelerated gastric emptying rather than potential inhibition of insulin production, which has been reported with high levels of ghrelin in animal studies or with high levels of ghrelin associated with starvation.

Thus, relamorelin demonstrated substantially improved core symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis, was generally safe and well tolerated, and should be further assessed in pivotal phase 3 trials. The results in this trial suggest that there is no dose-response relationship between the three doses of relamorelin tested and that future trials of relamorelin might not need to include the 100-microg b.i.d. dose. Importantly, this study also suggests the importance to prospectively manage the hyperglycemia in future trials.

Dr. Camilleri is a faculty member in the department of gastroenterology and hepatology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. His comments were made during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.

 

Gastroparesis is defined as delayed gastric emptying with associated symptoms in the absence of mechanical obstruction. The cardinal symptoms are upper abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, bloating, early satiety, nausea, and, with more severe disease, vomiting. Weight loss, malnutrition, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, bezoar formation, and aspiration pneumonia may occur in advanced cases. Unfortunately, there are few approved or efficacious treatment options for diabetic gastroparesis. The 5-HT4 receptor agonist, cisapride, has been withdrawn from the prescription markets in most countries.

AGA Institute
Dr. Michael Camilleri
Relamorelin (RM-131) is a selective pentapeptide ghrelin receptor agonist with potent prokinetic properties. A prior phase 2a study showed that 10 microg b.i.d. relamorelin subcutaneously for 4 weeks had prokinetic activity and relieved symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis, especially in patients with vomiting at baseline.

The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy of relamorelin on disease symptoms and gastric emptying in moderate to severe diabetic gastroparesis. In a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial, with a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in, patients were randomized to 10 microg b.i.d., 30 microg b.i.d., 100 microg b.i.d., or placebo b.i.d. Patients completed a daily e-diary of symptoms (Diabetic Gastroparesis Symptom Severity Diary [DGSSD]: nausea, abdominal pain, postprandial fullness, and bloating on a 0–10 scale) and vomiting episodes, which were summarized by treatment week. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in vomiting frequency; a key secondary endpoint was change from baseline in a four-symptom composite of DGSSD symptoms.

A longitudinal analysis over the 12-week trial showed there were reductions in nausea, postprandial fullness, abdominal pain, and bloating individually and as a composite score. Relamorelin accelerated gastric emptying T1/2 at all three doses compared with placebo. However, there were no effects on vomiting frequency, which showed a high placebo response. More hyperglycemia events and diarrhea events were observed with relamorelin treatment compared with placebo. The diarrhea reflects the previously demonstrated stimulation of colonic transit and motility and reduction of symptoms of constipation in patients with chronic constipation. The hyperglycemia likely resulted from accelerated gastric emptying rather than potential inhibition of insulin production, which has been reported with high levels of ghrelin in animal studies or with high levels of ghrelin associated with starvation.

Thus, relamorelin demonstrated substantially improved core symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis, was generally safe and well tolerated, and should be further assessed in pivotal phase 3 trials. The results in this trial suggest that there is no dose-response relationship between the three doses of relamorelin tested and that future trials of relamorelin might not need to include the 100-microg b.i.d. dose. Importantly, this study also suggests the importance to prospectively manage the hyperglycemia in future trials.

Dr. Camilleri is a faculty member in the department of gastroenterology and hepatology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. His comments were made during the AGA Institute Presidential Plenary at the Annual Digestive Disease Week.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Co-occurrence of Steatocystoma Multiplex, Eruptive Vellus Hair Cysts, and Trichofolliculomas

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Co-occurrence of Steatocystoma Multiplex, Eruptive Vellus Hair Cysts, and Trichofolliculomas

An association between steatocystoma multiplex (SCM) and eruptive vellus hair cysts (EVHCs) has been recognized. They are related conditions representing nevoid malformations of the pilosebaceous junctions1-10 that have similar clinical features but distinctive histologic features. Both conditions most commonly involve the anterior aspect of the chest. Six cases of a rare facial variant of SCM have been reported,11-16 3 involving lesions limited to the forehead.13-15 Two patients with a rare facial variant of EVHC also have been reported.17 The development of separate lesions of SCM and EVHC on the trunk can uncommonly occur.5,6,10 One case of SCM and EVHC on the forehead has been described.3 Other types of benign follicular neoplasms simultaneously developing in association with SCM or EVHC also are rare. The simultaneous occurrence of multiple trichoblastomas, trichoepitheliomas, and SCM on the face and trunk has been reported in 1 case.18 Milia, SCM, and EVHC on the face and trunk have been reported in 1 family.4 A report of facial steatocystoma associated with a pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus also has occurred in 1 patient.19 Here, we report the simultaneous occurrence of SCM, EVHC, and trichofolliculomas localized to the forehead.

Case Report

A 37-year-old man had an increasing number of flesh-colored to yellow papules on the forehead that had been present since puberty. Although the lesions were asymptomatic, some had recently become tender, which led him to seek medical care. There was no history of trauma, burns, irradiation, or application of topical agents to the area or use of eyeglasses or goggles. The patient’s father had similar lesions limited to the forehead, which developed during adolescence.

On evaluation at our clinic, skin examination revealed 16 discrete, 0.3- to 1-cm, flesh-colored, yellow to blue, mobile, smooth papules, as well as flesh-colored papules with a central black punctum, on the forehead (Figure 1). Similar lesions were not present on the rest of the face; around the ears; or on the scalp, neck, chest, back, abdomen, genitalia, buttocks, palms, soles, axillae, arms, or legs. There were no nail abnormalities.

Figure 1. Multiple 0.3- to 1-cm, flesh-colored, yellow to blue, smooth, mobile papules on the forehead (A and B). A 3-mm, flesh-colored papule with a central black punctum on the center of the forehead (C).

Multiple 3-, 4-, and 6-mm punch and excisional biopsies were performed to remove all 16 lesions on the forehead. Histologic examination revealed a collapsed cystic structure in the mid dermis in 10 lesions. The cysts were lined with a squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with an eosinophilic corrugated lining, and the cyst cavity contained scant homogeneous eosinophilic secretion. Mature sebaceous glands were adjacent to the outer portion of the cyst wall. These histologic findings were consistent with SCM (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Photomicrograph of a steatocystoma multiplex lesion demonstrated a collapsed cystic space with parallel infoldings of the cyst wall. The cyst wall was composed of a squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with an eosinophilic corrugated lining. The cyst cavity contained scant homogeneous eosinophilic secretion. Mature sebaceous lobules emanated from the cyst wall (H&E, original magnification ×10).

In 3 lesions, histologic examination revealed a cystic structure lined by a few layers of stratified squamous epithelium in the mid dermis. The cyst cavity contained numerous small vellus hairs and laminated keratin. These histologic findings were consistent with EVHC (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Photomicrograph of eruptive vellus hair cysts demonstrated a small cystic structure lined by squamous epithelium with a granular layer in the mid dermis. The cyst cavity contained numerous small vellus hairs and laminated keratin (H&E, original magnification ×10).

In the other 3 lesions, histologic examination revealed a dilated central cystic cavity filled with laminated keratin in the mid dermis. Multiple small follicles arose from the cysts and showed differentiation toward germinative epithelium. The surrounding stroma was fibrotic and contained a patchy lymphocytic infiltrate. These histologic findings were consistent with trichofolliculomas (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Photomicrograph of a trichofolliculoma demonstrated a central dilated primary follicle that was contiguous with the surface epidermis and contained laminated keratin. Multiple small secondary follicles arose from the primary follicle. These secondary follicles showed differentiation toward germinative epithelium and hair bulb and papilla formation. The stroma was fibrotic (H&E, original magnification ×10).
 

 

Comment

Characteristics of SCM
Steatocystoma multiplex is an uncommon condition characterized by the formation of asymptomatic, 0.2- to 2-cm, yellow to flesh-colored, soft, mobile papules or nodules on the trunk, extremities, axillae, genitalia, and/or chest. The lesions contain a clear or opaque, oily, milky or yellow, odorless fluid and most commonly are located on the anterior aspect of the chest. The face is not a commonly involved site in this condition. Six cases of a rare facial variant of SCM have been reported,11-16 with lesions limited to the forehead in 3 cases.13-15

In 1937, Mount20 credited Bozellini for describing the first case, though 3 cases reported in the late 1800s probably were SCM.21 In 1899, Pringle22 coined the term steatocystoma multiplex for this condition. It can be sporadic or have an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern. Steatocystoma multiplex can occur at any age, though lesions develop most frequently in adolescence or young adulthood. There is no sex predilection.

Steatocystoma multiplex with pachyonychia congenita has been reported in a familial case.23 Other findings reported in patients with SCM include ichthyosis, koilonychia, acrokeratosis verruciformis of Hopf and hypertrophic lichen planus, hidradenitis suppurativa, hypotrichosis, multiple keratoacanthomas, and rheumatoid arthritis.12,24-26

Steatocystoma multiplex is a cyst lined by stratified squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with a thick eosinophilic cuticle. Mature sebaceous lobules are closely associated with the cyst wall. Steatocystoma multiplex arises from the sebaceous duct because the lining of the lumen is composed of undulating eosinophilic cuticle.

Characteristics of EVHCs
Eruptive vellus hair cysts, which were first described by Esterly et al,27 can occur at any age but develop most frequently in adolescents or young adults. Sometimes the lesions are congenital or appear in childhood. There is no sex predilection. They can be sporadic or have an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern.

Eruptive vellus hair cysts are asymptomatic, 1- to 2-mm, smooth, crusted, or umbilicated papules on the chest or arms and legs. Eruptive vellus hair cysts most commonly involve the anterior aspect of the chest. The lesions are flesh-colored to yellow, though they have a slate gray color in darker-skinned individuals. A rare facial variant has been reported in 2 patients of Asian descent.17

Eruptive vellus hair cysts are small cystic structures lined by a stratified squamous epithelium with a granular layer. The cyst cavity contains numerous small vellus hair shafts and laminated keratin. Eruptive vellus hair cysts originate from the infundibulum or less frequently the isthmus or infundibular-isthmic junction of the hair follicle.

Characteristics of Trichofolliculomas
Trichofolliculomas are solitary, 3- to 5-mm, flesh-colored papules that occur on the face. They are highly differentiated, benign, neoplastic proliferations of an actively trichogenic epithelium, with structural components reflecting all portions of the pilosebaceous unit. Trichofolliculomas consist of a central dilated primary follicle contiguous with the surface epidermis embedded in a fibrous stroma. Multiple small secondary follicles with varying degrees of follicular differentiation arise from the primary follicle.

Co-occurrence of Lesions
An association between SCM and EVHC has been recognized.5-10 Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC have similar clinical features but distinctive histologic features. They also have a similar age of onset, location/appearance of lesions, and mode of inheritance. Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC can be distinguished by immunohistochemical techniques: SCM shows expression of keratin 10 and keratin 17, whereas EVHCs express only keratin 17.28

Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC have only rarely been reported to occur together on the trunk. One case of SCM and EVHC occurring on the forehead has been described.3 Other types of benign follicular neoplasms simultaneously developing in association with SCM or EVHC also are rare. Milia, SCM, and EVHC on the face and trunk have been reported in 1 family,4 and facial steatocystoma associated with a pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus was reported in 1 patient.19 Although trichofolliculomas have not been reported to occur with SCM or EVHC, 2 related follicular neoplasms—trichoepitheliomas and trichoblastomas—have been reported to occur in association with SCM on the face and chest and around the ears in 1 case.18

Differential Diagnosis
The clinical differential diagnosis includes multiple epidermoid cysts, dermoid cysts, Gardner syndrome, sebaceous adenomas, Muir-Torre syndrome, syringomas, milia, leiomyomas, lipomas, acneiform folliculitis, multiple familial and nonfamilial trichoepitheliomas, cylindromas, and angiofibromas.3,29

Conclusion

Our patient represents a rare case of simultaneous occurrence of SCM, EVHC, and trichofolliculomas localized to the forehead. The patient had multiple neoplasms involving differentiation toward various regions of the pilosebaceous unit. This case gives further support to the hypothesis that these benign follicular neoplasms are closely related but are distinct conditions within the spectrum of the same disease process. They represent nevoid malformations of the pilosebaceous unit that can be sporadic or inherited in an autosomal-dominant pattern. Pure types of these lesions may represent one end of the spectrum, but in some patients, there are overlapping features or hybrids of each condition. Several biopsies from patients with multiple lesions should be performed to establish an accurate diagnosis.

References
  1. Cho S, Chang SE, Choi JH, et al. Clinical and histologic features of 64 cases of steatocystoma multiplex. J Dermatol. 2002;29:152-156.
  2. Ogawa Y, Nogita T, Kawashima M. The coexistence of eruptive vellus hair cysts and steatocystoma multiplex. J Dermatol. 1992;19:570-571.
  3. Sanchez Yus E, Requena L. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990;12:536-537.
  4. Patrizi A, Neri I, Guerrini V, et al. Persistent milia, steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts: variable expression of multiple pilosebaceous cysts within an affected family. Dermatology. 1998;196:392-396.
  5. Ohtake N, Kubota Y, Takayama O, et al. Relationship between steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(5, pt 2):876-878.
  6. Kiene P, Hauschild A, Christophers E. Eruptive vellus hair cysts and steatocystoma multiplex: variants of one entity? Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:365-367.
  7. Hurlimann AF, Panizzon RG, Burg G. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex: hybrid cysts. Dermatology. 1996;192:64-66.
  8. Sexton M, Murdock DK. Eruptive vellus hair cysts: a follicular cyst of the sebaceous duct (sometimes). Am J Dermatopathol. 1989;11:364-368.
  9. Sanchez-Yus E, Aguilar-Martinez A, Cristobal-Gil MC, et al. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex: two related conditions? J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:40-42.
  10. Ahn SK, Chung J, Lee WS, et al. Hybrid cysts showing alternate combination of eruptive vellus hair cyst, steatocystoma multiplex, and epidermoid cyst, and an association among the three conditions. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:645-649.
  11. Ahn SK, Hwang SM, Lee SH, et al. Steatocystoma multiplex localized only in the face. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:372-373.
  12. Cole LA. Steatocystoma multiplex. Arch Dermatol. 1976;112:1437-1439.
  13. Hansen KK, Troy JL, Fairley JA. Multiple papules of the scalp and forehead. steatocystoma multiplex (facial papular variant). Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:835-838.
  14. Nishimura M, Kohda H, Urabe A. Steatocystoma multiplex: a facial popular variant. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:205-207.
  15. Requena L, Martin L, Renedo G, et al. A facial variant of steatocystoma multiplex. Cutis. 1993;51:449-452.
  16. Holmes R, Black MM. Steatocystoma multiplex with unusually prominent cysts on the face. Br J Dermatol. 1980;102:711-713.
  17. Kumakiri M, Takashima I, Iju M, et al. Eruptive vellus hair cysts: a facial variant. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;7:461-467.
  18. Gianotti R, Cavicchini S, Alessi E. Simultaneous occurrence of multiple trichoblastomas and steatocystoma multiplex. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19:294-298.
  19. Sardana K, Sharma RC, Jain A, et al. Facial steatocystoma multiplex associated with pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus. J Dermatol. 2002;29:157-159.
  20. Mount LB. Steatocystoma multiplex. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1937;36:31-39.
  21. Dubreuilh W, Auche B. Kystes grassieux sudoripares. Arch Clin de Bordeaux. 1896;5:387-391.
  22. Pringle JJ. A case of peculiar multiple sebaceous cysts (steatocystoma multiplex). Br J Dermatol. 1899;11:381-88.
  23. Vineyard WR, Scott RA. Steatocystoma multiplex with pachyonychia congenital: eight cases in four generations. Arch Dermatol. 1961;84:824-827.
  24. Contreras MA, Costello MJ. Steatocystoma multiplex with embryonal hair formation: case presentation and consideration of pathogenesis. AMA Arch Derm. 1957;76:720-725.
  25. Sohn D, Chin TC, Fellner MJ. Multiple keratoacanthomas associated with steatocystoma multiplex and rheumatoid arthritis: a case report. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:913-915.
  26. Verbov J. Acrokeratosis verruciformis of Hopf with steatocystoma multiplex and hypertrophic lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1972;86:91-94.
  27. Esterly NB, Fretzin DF, Pinkus H. Eruptive vellus hair cysts. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:500-503.
  28. Tomkova H, Fujimoto W, Arata J. Expression of keratins (K10 and K17) in steatocystoma multiplex, eruptive vellus hair cysts, and epidermoid and trichilemmal cysts. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19:250-253.
  29. Feinstein A, Trau H, Movshovitz M, et al. Steatocystoma multiplex. Cutis. 1983;31:425-427.
Article PDF
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology and the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Alina G. Bridges, DO, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 ([email protected]).

Issue
Cutis - 100(1)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
E23-E26
Sections
Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology and the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Alina G. Bridges, DO, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 ([email protected]).

Author and Disclosure Information

From the Department of Dermatology and the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Correspondence: Alina G. Bridges, DO, Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 ([email protected]).

Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles

An association between steatocystoma multiplex (SCM) and eruptive vellus hair cysts (EVHCs) has been recognized. They are related conditions representing nevoid malformations of the pilosebaceous junctions1-10 that have similar clinical features but distinctive histologic features. Both conditions most commonly involve the anterior aspect of the chest. Six cases of a rare facial variant of SCM have been reported,11-16 3 involving lesions limited to the forehead.13-15 Two patients with a rare facial variant of EVHC also have been reported.17 The development of separate lesions of SCM and EVHC on the trunk can uncommonly occur.5,6,10 One case of SCM and EVHC on the forehead has been described.3 Other types of benign follicular neoplasms simultaneously developing in association with SCM or EVHC also are rare. The simultaneous occurrence of multiple trichoblastomas, trichoepitheliomas, and SCM on the face and trunk has been reported in 1 case.18 Milia, SCM, and EVHC on the face and trunk have been reported in 1 family.4 A report of facial steatocystoma associated with a pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus also has occurred in 1 patient.19 Here, we report the simultaneous occurrence of SCM, EVHC, and trichofolliculomas localized to the forehead.

Case Report

A 37-year-old man had an increasing number of flesh-colored to yellow papules on the forehead that had been present since puberty. Although the lesions were asymptomatic, some had recently become tender, which led him to seek medical care. There was no history of trauma, burns, irradiation, or application of topical agents to the area or use of eyeglasses or goggles. The patient’s father had similar lesions limited to the forehead, which developed during adolescence.

On evaluation at our clinic, skin examination revealed 16 discrete, 0.3- to 1-cm, flesh-colored, yellow to blue, mobile, smooth papules, as well as flesh-colored papules with a central black punctum, on the forehead (Figure 1). Similar lesions were not present on the rest of the face; around the ears; or on the scalp, neck, chest, back, abdomen, genitalia, buttocks, palms, soles, axillae, arms, or legs. There were no nail abnormalities.

Figure 1. Multiple 0.3- to 1-cm, flesh-colored, yellow to blue, smooth, mobile papules on the forehead (A and B). A 3-mm, flesh-colored papule with a central black punctum on the center of the forehead (C).

Multiple 3-, 4-, and 6-mm punch and excisional biopsies were performed to remove all 16 lesions on the forehead. Histologic examination revealed a collapsed cystic structure in the mid dermis in 10 lesions. The cysts were lined with a squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with an eosinophilic corrugated lining, and the cyst cavity contained scant homogeneous eosinophilic secretion. Mature sebaceous glands were adjacent to the outer portion of the cyst wall. These histologic findings were consistent with SCM (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Photomicrograph of a steatocystoma multiplex lesion demonstrated a collapsed cystic space with parallel infoldings of the cyst wall. The cyst wall was composed of a squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with an eosinophilic corrugated lining. The cyst cavity contained scant homogeneous eosinophilic secretion. Mature sebaceous lobules emanated from the cyst wall (H&E, original magnification ×10).

In 3 lesions, histologic examination revealed a cystic structure lined by a few layers of stratified squamous epithelium in the mid dermis. The cyst cavity contained numerous small vellus hairs and laminated keratin. These histologic findings were consistent with EVHC (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Photomicrograph of eruptive vellus hair cysts demonstrated a small cystic structure lined by squamous epithelium with a granular layer in the mid dermis. The cyst cavity contained numerous small vellus hairs and laminated keratin (H&E, original magnification ×10).

In the other 3 lesions, histologic examination revealed a dilated central cystic cavity filled with laminated keratin in the mid dermis. Multiple small follicles arose from the cysts and showed differentiation toward germinative epithelium. The surrounding stroma was fibrotic and contained a patchy lymphocytic infiltrate. These histologic findings were consistent with trichofolliculomas (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Photomicrograph of a trichofolliculoma demonstrated a central dilated primary follicle that was contiguous with the surface epidermis and contained laminated keratin. Multiple small secondary follicles arose from the primary follicle. These secondary follicles showed differentiation toward germinative epithelium and hair bulb and papilla formation. The stroma was fibrotic (H&E, original magnification ×10).
 

 

Comment

Characteristics of SCM
Steatocystoma multiplex is an uncommon condition characterized by the formation of asymptomatic, 0.2- to 2-cm, yellow to flesh-colored, soft, mobile papules or nodules on the trunk, extremities, axillae, genitalia, and/or chest. The lesions contain a clear or opaque, oily, milky or yellow, odorless fluid and most commonly are located on the anterior aspect of the chest. The face is not a commonly involved site in this condition. Six cases of a rare facial variant of SCM have been reported,11-16 with lesions limited to the forehead in 3 cases.13-15

In 1937, Mount20 credited Bozellini for describing the first case, though 3 cases reported in the late 1800s probably were SCM.21 In 1899, Pringle22 coined the term steatocystoma multiplex for this condition. It can be sporadic or have an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern. Steatocystoma multiplex can occur at any age, though lesions develop most frequently in adolescence or young adulthood. There is no sex predilection.

Steatocystoma multiplex with pachyonychia congenita has been reported in a familial case.23 Other findings reported in patients with SCM include ichthyosis, koilonychia, acrokeratosis verruciformis of Hopf and hypertrophic lichen planus, hidradenitis suppurativa, hypotrichosis, multiple keratoacanthomas, and rheumatoid arthritis.12,24-26

Steatocystoma multiplex is a cyst lined by stratified squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with a thick eosinophilic cuticle. Mature sebaceous lobules are closely associated with the cyst wall. Steatocystoma multiplex arises from the sebaceous duct because the lining of the lumen is composed of undulating eosinophilic cuticle.

Characteristics of EVHCs
Eruptive vellus hair cysts, which were first described by Esterly et al,27 can occur at any age but develop most frequently in adolescents or young adults. Sometimes the lesions are congenital or appear in childhood. There is no sex predilection. They can be sporadic or have an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern.

Eruptive vellus hair cysts are asymptomatic, 1- to 2-mm, smooth, crusted, or umbilicated papules on the chest or arms and legs. Eruptive vellus hair cysts most commonly involve the anterior aspect of the chest. The lesions are flesh-colored to yellow, though they have a slate gray color in darker-skinned individuals. A rare facial variant has been reported in 2 patients of Asian descent.17

Eruptive vellus hair cysts are small cystic structures lined by a stratified squamous epithelium with a granular layer. The cyst cavity contains numerous small vellus hair shafts and laminated keratin. Eruptive vellus hair cysts originate from the infundibulum or less frequently the isthmus or infundibular-isthmic junction of the hair follicle.

Characteristics of Trichofolliculomas
Trichofolliculomas are solitary, 3- to 5-mm, flesh-colored papules that occur on the face. They are highly differentiated, benign, neoplastic proliferations of an actively trichogenic epithelium, with structural components reflecting all portions of the pilosebaceous unit. Trichofolliculomas consist of a central dilated primary follicle contiguous with the surface epidermis embedded in a fibrous stroma. Multiple small secondary follicles with varying degrees of follicular differentiation arise from the primary follicle.

Co-occurrence of Lesions
An association between SCM and EVHC has been recognized.5-10 Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC have similar clinical features but distinctive histologic features. They also have a similar age of onset, location/appearance of lesions, and mode of inheritance. Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC can be distinguished by immunohistochemical techniques: SCM shows expression of keratin 10 and keratin 17, whereas EVHCs express only keratin 17.28

Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC have only rarely been reported to occur together on the trunk. One case of SCM and EVHC occurring on the forehead has been described.3 Other types of benign follicular neoplasms simultaneously developing in association with SCM or EVHC also are rare. Milia, SCM, and EVHC on the face and trunk have been reported in 1 family,4 and facial steatocystoma associated with a pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus was reported in 1 patient.19 Although trichofolliculomas have not been reported to occur with SCM or EVHC, 2 related follicular neoplasms—trichoepitheliomas and trichoblastomas—have been reported to occur in association with SCM on the face and chest and around the ears in 1 case.18

Differential Diagnosis
The clinical differential diagnosis includes multiple epidermoid cysts, dermoid cysts, Gardner syndrome, sebaceous adenomas, Muir-Torre syndrome, syringomas, milia, leiomyomas, lipomas, acneiform folliculitis, multiple familial and nonfamilial trichoepitheliomas, cylindromas, and angiofibromas.3,29

Conclusion

Our patient represents a rare case of simultaneous occurrence of SCM, EVHC, and trichofolliculomas localized to the forehead. The patient had multiple neoplasms involving differentiation toward various regions of the pilosebaceous unit. This case gives further support to the hypothesis that these benign follicular neoplasms are closely related but are distinct conditions within the spectrum of the same disease process. They represent nevoid malformations of the pilosebaceous unit that can be sporadic or inherited in an autosomal-dominant pattern. Pure types of these lesions may represent one end of the spectrum, but in some patients, there are overlapping features or hybrids of each condition. Several biopsies from patients with multiple lesions should be performed to establish an accurate diagnosis.

An association between steatocystoma multiplex (SCM) and eruptive vellus hair cysts (EVHCs) has been recognized. They are related conditions representing nevoid malformations of the pilosebaceous junctions1-10 that have similar clinical features but distinctive histologic features. Both conditions most commonly involve the anterior aspect of the chest. Six cases of a rare facial variant of SCM have been reported,11-16 3 involving lesions limited to the forehead.13-15 Two patients with a rare facial variant of EVHC also have been reported.17 The development of separate lesions of SCM and EVHC on the trunk can uncommonly occur.5,6,10 One case of SCM and EVHC on the forehead has been described.3 Other types of benign follicular neoplasms simultaneously developing in association with SCM or EVHC also are rare. The simultaneous occurrence of multiple trichoblastomas, trichoepitheliomas, and SCM on the face and trunk has been reported in 1 case.18 Milia, SCM, and EVHC on the face and trunk have been reported in 1 family.4 A report of facial steatocystoma associated with a pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus also has occurred in 1 patient.19 Here, we report the simultaneous occurrence of SCM, EVHC, and trichofolliculomas localized to the forehead.

Case Report

A 37-year-old man had an increasing number of flesh-colored to yellow papules on the forehead that had been present since puberty. Although the lesions were asymptomatic, some had recently become tender, which led him to seek medical care. There was no history of trauma, burns, irradiation, or application of topical agents to the area or use of eyeglasses or goggles. The patient’s father had similar lesions limited to the forehead, which developed during adolescence.

On evaluation at our clinic, skin examination revealed 16 discrete, 0.3- to 1-cm, flesh-colored, yellow to blue, mobile, smooth papules, as well as flesh-colored papules with a central black punctum, on the forehead (Figure 1). Similar lesions were not present on the rest of the face; around the ears; or on the scalp, neck, chest, back, abdomen, genitalia, buttocks, palms, soles, axillae, arms, or legs. There were no nail abnormalities.

Figure 1. Multiple 0.3- to 1-cm, flesh-colored, yellow to blue, smooth, mobile papules on the forehead (A and B). A 3-mm, flesh-colored papule with a central black punctum on the center of the forehead (C).

Multiple 3-, 4-, and 6-mm punch and excisional biopsies were performed to remove all 16 lesions on the forehead. Histologic examination revealed a collapsed cystic structure in the mid dermis in 10 lesions. The cysts were lined with a squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with an eosinophilic corrugated lining, and the cyst cavity contained scant homogeneous eosinophilic secretion. Mature sebaceous glands were adjacent to the outer portion of the cyst wall. These histologic findings were consistent with SCM (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Photomicrograph of a steatocystoma multiplex lesion demonstrated a collapsed cystic space with parallel infoldings of the cyst wall. The cyst wall was composed of a squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with an eosinophilic corrugated lining. The cyst cavity contained scant homogeneous eosinophilic secretion. Mature sebaceous lobules emanated from the cyst wall (H&E, original magnification ×10).

In 3 lesions, histologic examination revealed a cystic structure lined by a few layers of stratified squamous epithelium in the mid dermis. The cyst cavity contained numerous small vellus hairs and laminated keratin. These histologic findings were consistent with EVHC (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Photomicrograph of eruptive vellus hair cysts demonstrated a small cystic structure lined by squamous epithelium with a granular layer in the mid dermis. The cyst cavity contained numerous small vellus hairs and laminated keratin (H&E, original magnification ×10).

In the other 3 lesions, histologic examination revealed a dilated central cystic cavity filled with laminated keratin in the mid dermis. Multiple small follicles arose from the cysts and showed differentiation toward germinative epithelium. The surrounding stroma was fibrotic and contained a patchy lymphocytic infiltrate. These histologic findings were consistent with trichofolliculomas (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Photomicrograph of a trichofolliculoma demonstrated a central dilated primary follicle that was contiguous with the surface epidermis and contained laminated keratin. Multiple small secondary follicles arose from the primary follicle. These secondary follicles showed differentiation toward germinative epithelium and hair bulb and papilla formation. The stroma was fibrotic (H&E, original magnification ×10).
 

 

Comment

Characteristics of SCM
Steatocystoma multiplex is an uncommon condition characterized by the formation of asymptomatic, 0.2- to 2-cm, yellow to flesh-colored, soft, mobile papules or nodules on the trunk, extremities, axillae, genitalia, and/or chest. The lesions contain a clear or opaque, oily, milky or yellow, odorless fluid and most commonly are located on the anterior aspect of the chest. The face is not a commonly involved site in this condition. Six cases of a rare facial variant of SCM have been reported,11-16 with lesions limited to the forehead in 3 cases.13-15

In 1937, Mount20 credited Bozellini for describing the first case, though 3 cases reported in the late 1800s probably were SCM.21 In 1899, Pringle22 coined the term steatocystoma multiplex for this condition. It can be sporadic or have an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern. Steatocystoma multiplex can occur at any age, though lesions develop most frequently in adolescence or young adulthood. There is no sex predilection.

Steatocystoma multiplex with pachyonychia congenita has been reported in a familial case.23 Other findings reported in patients with SCM include ichthyosis, koilonychia, acrokeratosis verruciformis of Hopf and hypertrophic lichen planus, hidradenitis suppurativa, hypotrichosis, multiple keratoacanthomas, and rheumatoid arthritis.12,24-26

Steatocystoma multiplex is a cyst lined by stratified squamous epithelium without a granular layer but with a thick eosinophilic cuticle. Mature sebaceous lobules are closely associated with the cyst wall. Steatocystoma multiplex arises from the sebaceous duct because the lining of the lumen is composed of undulating eosinophilic cuticle.

Characteristics of EVHCs
Eruptive vellus hair cysts, which were first described by Esterly et al,27 can occur at any age but develop most frequently in adolescents or young adults. Sometimes the lesions are congenital or appear in childhood. There is no sex predilection. They can be sporadic or have an autosomal-dominant inheritance pattern.

Eruptive vellus hair cysts are asymptomatic, 1- to 2-mm, smooth, crusted, or umbilicated papules on the chest or arms and legs. Eruptive vellus hair cysts most commonly involve the anterior aspect of the chest. The lesions are flesh-colored to yellow, though they have a slate gray color in darker-skinned individuals. A rare facial variant has been reported in 2 patients of Asian descent.17

Eruptive vellus hair cysts are small cystic structures lined by a stratified squamous epithelium with a granular layer. The cyst cavity contains numerous small vellus hair shafts and laminated keratin. Eruptive vellus hair cysts originate from the infundibulum or less frequently the isthmus or infundibular-isthmic junction of the hair follicle.

Characteristics of Trichofolliculomas
Trichofolliculomas are solitary, 3- to 5-mm, flesh-colored papules that occur on the face. They are highly differentiated, benign, neoplastic proliferations of an actively trichogenic epithelium, with structural components reflecting all portions of the pilosebaceous unit. Trichofolliculomas consist of a central dilated primary follicle contiguous with the surface epidermis embedded in a fibrous stroma. Multiple small secondary follicles with varying degrees of follicular differentiation arise from the primary follicle.

Co-occurrence of Lesions
An association between SCM and EVHC has been recognized.5-10 Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC have similar clinical features but distinctive histologic features. They also have a similar age of onset, location/appearance of lesions, and mode of inheritance. Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC can be distinguished by immunohistochemical techniques: SCM shows expression of keratin 10 and keratin 17, whereas EVHCs express only keratin 17.28

Steatocystoma multiplex and EVHC have only rarely been reported to occur together on the trunk. One case of SCM and EVHC occurring on the forehead has been described.3 Other types of benign follicular neoplasms simultaneously developing in association with SCM or EVHC also are rare. Milia, SCM, and EVHC on the face and trunk have been reported in 1 family,4 and facial steatocystoma associated with a pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus was reported in 1 patient.19 Although trichofolliculomas have not been reported to occur with SCM or EVHC, 2 related follicular neoplasms—trichoepitheliomas and trichoblastomas—have been reported to occur in association with SCM on the face and chest and around the ears in 1 case.18

Differential Diagnosis
The clinical differential diagnosis includes multiple epidermoid cysts, dermoid cysts, Gardner syndrome, sebaceous adenomas, Muir-Torre syndrome, syringomas, milia, leiomyomas, lipomas, acneiform folliculitis, multiple familial and nonfamilial trichoepitheliomas, cylindromas, and angiofibromas.3,29

Conclusion

Our patient represents a rare case of simultaneous occurrence of SCM, EVHC, and trichofolliculomas localized to the forehead. The patient had multiple neoplasms involving differentiation toward various regions of the pilosebaceous unit. This case gives further support to the hypothesis that these benign follicular neoplasms are closely related but are distinct conditions within the spectrum of the same disease process. They represent nevoid malformations of the pilosebaceous unit that can be sporadic or inherited in an autosomal-dominant pattern. Pure types of these lesions may represent one end of the spectrum, but in some patients, there are overlapping features or hybrids of each condition. Several biopsies from patients with multiple lesions should be performed to establish an accurate diagnosis.

References
  1. Cho S, Chang SE, Choi JH, et al. Clinical and histologic features of 64 cases of steatocystoma multiplex. J Dermatol. 2002;29:152-156.
  2. Ogawa Y, Nogita T, Kawashima M. The coexistence of eruptive vellus hair cysts and steatocystoma multiplex. J Dermatol. 1992;19:570-571.
  3. Sanchez Yus E, Requena L. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990;12:536-537.
  4. Patrizi A, Neri I, Guerrini V, et al. Persistent milia, steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts: variable expression of multiple pilosebaceous cysts within an affected family. Dermatology. 1998;196:392-396.
  5. Ohtake N, Kubota Y, Takayama O, et al. Relationship between steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(5, pt 2):876-878.
  6. Kiene P, Hauschild A, Christophers E. Eruptive vellus hair cysts and steatocystoma multiplex: variants of one entity? Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:365-367.
  7. Hurlimann AF, Panizzon RG, Burg G. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex: hybrid cysts. Dermatology. 1996;192:64-66.
  8. Sexton M, Murdock DK. Eruptive vellus hair cysts: a follicular cyst of the sebaceous duct (sometimes). Am J Dermatopathol. 1989;11:364-368.
  9. Sanchez-Yus E, Aguilar-Martinez A, Cristobal-Gil MC, et al. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex: two related conditions? J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:40-42.
  10. Ahn SK, Chung J, Lee WS, et al. Hybrid cysts showing alternate combination of eruptive vellus hair cyst, steatocystoma multiplex, and epidermoid cyst, and an association among the three conditions. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:645-649.
  11. Ahn SK, Hwang SM, Lee SH, et al. Steatocystoma multiplex localized only in the face. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:372-373.
  12. Cole LA. Steatocystoma multiplex. Arch Dermatol. 1976;112:1437-1439.
  13. Hansen KK, Troy JL, Fairley JA. Multiple papules of the scalp and forehead. steatocystoma multiplex (facial papular variant). Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:835-838.
  14. Nishimura M, Kohda H, Urabe A. Steatocystoma multiplex: a facial popular variant. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:205-207.
  15. Requena L, Martin L, Renedo G, et al. A facial variant of steatocystoma multiplex. Cutis. 1993;51:449-452.
  16. Holmes R, Black MM. Steatocystoma multiplex with unusually prominent cysts on the face. Br J Dermatol. 1980;102:711-713.
  17. Kumakiri M, Takashima I, Iju M, et al. Eruptive vellus hair cysts: a facial variant. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;7:461-467.
  18. Gianotti R, Cavicchini S, Alessi E. Simultaneous occurrence of multiple trichoblastomas and steatocystoma multiplex. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19:294-298.
  19. Sardana K, Sharma RC, Jain A, et al. Facial steatocystoma multiplex associated with pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus. J Dermatol. 2002;29:157-159.
  20. Mount LB. Steatocystoma multiplex. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1937;36:31-39.
  21. Dubreuilh W, Auche B. Kystes grassieux sudoripares. Arch Clin de Bordeaux. 1896;5:387-391.
  22. Pringle JJ. A case of peculiar multiple sebaceous cysts (steatocystoma multiplex). Br J Dermatol. 1899;11:381-88.
  23. Vineyard WR, Scott RA. Steatocystoma multiplex with pachyonychia congenital: eight cases in four generations. Arch Dermatol. 1961;84:824-827.
  24. Contreras MA, Costello MJ. Steatocystoma multiplex with embryonal hair formation: case presentation and consideration of pathogenesis. AMA Arch Derm. 1957;76:720-725.
  25. Sohn D, Chin TC, Fellner MJ. Multiple keratoacanthomas associated with steatocystoma multiplex and rheumatoid arthritis: a case report. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:913-915.
  26. Verbov J. Acrokeratosis verruciformis of Hopf with steatocystoma multiplex and hypertrophic lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1972;86:91-94.
  27. Esterly NB, Fretzin DF, Pinkus H. Eruptive vellus hair cysts. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:500-503.
  28. Tomkova H, Fujimoto W, Arata J. Expression of keratins (K10 and K17) in steatocystoma multiplex, eruptive vellus hair cysts, and epidermoid and trichilemmal cysts. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19:250-253.
  29. Feinstein A, Trau H, Movshovitz M, et al. Steatocystoma multiplex. Cutis. 1983;31:425-427.
References
  1. Cho S, Chang SE, Choi JH, et al. Clinical and histologic features of 64 cases of steatocystoma multiplex. J Dermatol. 2002;29:152-156.
  2. Ogawa Y, Nogita T, Kawashima M. The coexistence of eruptive vellus hair cysts and steatocystoma multiplex. J Dermatol. 1992;19:570-571.
  3. Sanchez Yus E, Requena L. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex. Am J Dermatopathol. 1990;12:536-537.
  4. Patrizi A, Neri I, Guerrini V, et al. Persistent milia, steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts: variable expression of multiple pilosebaceous cysts within an affected family. Dermatology. 1998;196:392-396.
  5. Ohtake N, Kubota Y, Takayama O, et al. Relationship between steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(5, pt 2):876-878.
  6. Kiene P, Hauschild A, Christophers E. Eruptive vellus hair cysts and steatocystoma multiplex: variants of one entity? Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:365-367.
  7. Hurlimann AF, Panizzon RG, Burg G. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex: hybrid cysts. Dermatology. 1996;192:64-66.
  8. Sexton M, Murdock DK. Eruptive vellus hair cysts: a follicular cyst of the sebaceous duct (sometimes). Am J Dermatopathol. 1989;11:364-368.
  9. Sanchez-Yus E, Aguilar-Martinez A, Cristobal-Gil MC, et al. Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex: two related conditions? J Cutan Pathol. 1988;15:40-42.
  10. Ahn SK, Chung J, Lee WS, et al. Hybrid cysts showing alternate combination of eruptive vellus hair cyst, steatocystoma multiplex, and epidermoid cyst, and an association among the three conditions. Am J Dermatopathol. 1996;18:645-649.
  11. Ahn SK, Hwang SM, Lee SH, et al. Steatocystoma multiplex localized only in the face. Int J Dermatol. 1997;36:372-373.
  12. Cole LA. Steatocystoma multiplex. Arch Dermatol. 1976;112:1437-1439.
  13. Hansen KK, Troy JL, Fairley JA. Multiple papules of the scalp and forehead. steatocystoma multiplex (facial papular variant). Arch Dermatol. 1995;131:835-838.
  14. Nishimura M, Kohda H, Urabe A. Steatocystoma multiplex: a facial popular variant. Arch Dermatol. 1986;122:205-207.
  15. Requena L, Martin L, Renedo G, et al. A facial variant of steatocystoma multiplex. Cutis. 1993;51:449-452.
  16. Holmes R, Black MM. Steatocystoma multiplex with unusually prominent cysts on the face. Br J Dermatol. 1980;102:711-713.
  17. Kumakiri M, Takashima I, Iju M, et al. Eruptive vellus hair cysts: a facial variant. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;7:461-467.
  18. Gianotti R, Cavicchini S, Alessi E. Simultaneous occurrence of multiple trichoblastomas and steatocystoma multiplex. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19:294-298.
  19. Sardana K, Sharma RC, Jain A, et al. Facial steatocystoma multiplex associated with pilar cyst and bilateral preauricular sinus. J Dermatol. 2002;29:157-159.
  20. Mount LB. Steatocystoma multiplex. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1937;36:31-39.
  21. Dubreuilh W, Auche B. Kystes grassieux sudoripares. Arch Clin de Bordeaux. 1896;5:387-391.
  22. Pringle JJ. A case of peculiar multiple sebaceous cysts (steatocystoma multiplex). Br J Dermatol. 1899;11:381-88.
  23. Vineyard WR, Scott RA. Steatocystoma multiplex with pachyonychia congenital: eight cases in four generations. Arch Dermatol. 1961;84:824-827.
  24. Contreras MA, Costello MJ. Steatocystoma multiplex with embryonal hair formation: case presentation and consideration of pathogenesis. AMA Arch Derm. 1957;76:720-725.
  25. Sohn D, Chin TC, Fellner MJ. Multiple keratoacanthomas associated with steatocystoma multiplex and rheumatoid arthritis: a case report. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:913-915.
  26. Verbov J. Acrokeratosis verruciformis of Hopf with steatocystoma multiplex and hypertrophic lichen planus. Br J Dermatol. 1972;86:91-94.
  27. Esterly NB, Fretzin DF, Pinkus H. Eruptive vellus hair cysts. Arch Dermatol. 1977;113:500-503.
  28. Tomkova H, Fujimoto W, Arata J. Expression of keratins (K10 and K17) in steatocystoma multiplex, eruptive vellus hair cysts, and epidermoid and trichilemmal cysts. Am J Dermatopathol. 1997;19:250-253.
  29. Feinstein A, Trau H, Movshovitz M, et al. Steatocystoma multiplex. Cutis. 1983;31:425-427.
Issue
Cutis - 100(1)
Issue
Cutis - 100(1)
Page Number
E23-E26
Page Number
E23-E26
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Co-occurrence of Steatocystoma Multiplex, Eruptive Vellus Hair Cysts, and Trichofolliculomas
Display Headline
Co-occurrence of Steatocystoma Multiplex, Eruptive Vellus Hair Cysts, and Trichofolliculomas
Sections
Inside the Article

Practice Points

  • Steatocystoma multiplex (SCM) and eruptive vellus hair cysts (EVHCs) have similar clinical features but distinctive histologic features.
  • Milia, pilar cyst, trichoepitheliomas, and trichoblastomas simultaneously developing in association with SCM or EVHC on the face are rare.
  • This case supports the hypothesis that these benign follicular neoplasms are related but distinct nevoid malformations of the pilosebaceous unit within the same disease spectrum.
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article PDF Media

No, you still can’t diagnose Trump

Article Type
Changed

 

On the morning of July 25, I scrolled through my Twitter account to see tweets flying: Psychiatrists can now defy the Goldwater Rule! Oops, wrong organization; no ,they can’t. Over the course of the day, articles appeared in Scientific American, the Los Angeles Times, Newsweek, International Business Times; and statements were issued by both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychoanalytic Association.

So what happened?

Dr. Dinah Miller
At the annual meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association – an organization of 3,500 interdisciplinary mental health professionals – its executive councilors were polled about whether they endorsed APsaA’s existing policy that allows for the organization’s comments on sociopolitical issues and not on specific political figures. The vote was unanimous to continue with its existing policy of commenting on issues, not individuals.

On July 6, 2017, the ApsaA had sent an email to all its members informing them of this decision. The email also stated: “However, it is important to note that members of APsaA are free to comment about political figures as individuals. The American Psychiatric Association’s ethical stance on the Goldwater Rule applies to its members only. The APsaA does not consider political commentary by its individual members an ethical matter.” (Bolding per the email). This was not considered to be a change in its policy.

Citing that email, on July 25, STAT reporter Sharon Begley wrote an article titled, “Psychiatry group tells members they can ignore ‘Goldwater rule’ and comment on Trump’s mental health.” The article was linked to on Twitter, and the retweets and comments started to fly. As a single example, Josh Marshall, editor and publisher of Talking Points Memo, tweeted out to his 215,000 followers: “Truly amazing am psych assoc says Trump so f’ing nuts they’re lifting Goldwater Rule.” The APA issued several statements over the course of the day, notably: “We are the largest psychiatric organization in the world with more than 37,000 members. The Goldwater Rules applies to our members.” Commenters expressed frustration with the Goldwater Rule, and suggested that the APA had a duty to warn.

Shortly after noon that day, the APsaA put a statement on its website to clarify information in the STAT article: “In an email to association members, our leadership did not encourage members to defy the “Goldwater Rule” which is a part of the ethics code of a different mental health organization, the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Rather, it articulated a distinct ethics position that represents the viewpoint of psychoanalysts. The field of psychoanalysis addresses the full spectrum of human behavior, and we feel that our concepts and understanding are applicable and valuable to understanding a wide range of human behaviors and cultural phenomenon.”

Later in the afternoon, I spoke with Wylie Tene, director of pubic affairs for the APsaA. He noted: “The article in StatNews had a misleading and sensational headline. It didn’t represent what our email was about.”

I found it interesting that a sensational headline on STAT’s website could lead to so much comment and so many articles in major news outlets. July 25, 2017, was not a slow news day: John McCain (R-Ariz) returned to the Senate that day and voted to proceed with the debate to repeal Obamacare. A single vote cast by Vice President Mike Pence broke the tie, allowing the debate to go forward.

Like many, I feel conflicted about the Goldwater Rule but for a single reason: I am a strong believer in free speech, and the rule squelches psychiatrists. But as I noted in a column in August 2016, I don’t believe that our opinions should, would, or could change our political environment. Psychiatric treatment is about compassion and healing, and diagnoses are based on symptoms that patients often tell us about in a setting of intimacy and trust. Diagnosing celebrities, on the other hand, is often about name calling; it risks insulting our patients and perpetuating stigma.

Regarding Mr. Trump, I’m going to finish with the same words I wrote back in August, prior to his election as president. You’ll note that my insights in Clinical Psychiatry News and circulated on the Internet – devoid of a diagnosis – did not influence the outcome of the general election. Psychiatric diagnoses are made by observing a constellation of symptoms that occur together.

Mr. Trump has given the whole world years of data – he’s lived his life in a very public way. As a real estate developer, he has had countless employees who all know how they’ve been treated. We’ve seen him through three marriages and watched how he interacts with his children. We’ve seen him take out full-page ads calling for the death penalty for a group of young men who were wrongly convicted in the rape and assault of the Central Park jogger in 1989. If that’s not enough, he has hosted his own reality television show, and we’ve now seen him countless times in debates and rallies. We know how he treats his running mates, journalist Megyn Kelly, a news reporter with a disability, and the parents of a fallen soldier. We’ve watched him allude to the size of his genitals during a primary debate. Every individual is free to decide if Mr. Trump’s widely viewed patterns of behavior represent much-needed spunk and change with political beliefs that align with their own, or if his words and behaviors represent cruelty, impulsivity, poor judgment, and a pattern of actions that some might not feel is dignified enough for our country’s leader. No degree is required to observe and draw conclusions.
 
 

 

Dr. Miller, who practices in Baltimore, is coauthor with Annette Hanson, MD, of “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016).

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

 

On the morning of July 25, I scrolled through my Twitter account to see tweets flying: Psychiatrists can now defy the Goldwater Rule! Oops, wrong organization; no ,they can’t. Over the course of the day, articles appeared in Scientific American, the Los Angeles Times, Newsweek, International Business Times; and statements were issued by both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychoanalytic Association.

So what happened?

Dr. Dinah Miller
At the annual meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association – an organization of 3,500 interdisciplinary mental health professionals – its executive councilors were polled about whether they endorsed APsaA’s existing policy that allows for the organization’s comments on sociopolitical issues and not on specific political figures. The vote was unanimous to continue with its existing policy of commenting on issues, not individuals.

On July 6, 2017, the ApsaA had sent an email to all its members informing them of this decision. The email also stated: “However, it is important to note that members of APsaA are free to comment about political figures as individuals. The American Psychiatric Association’s ethical stance on the Goldwater Rule applies to its members only. The APsaA does not consider political commentary by its individual members an ethical matter.” (Bolding per the email). This was not considered to be a change in its policy.

Citing that email, on July 25, STAT reporter Sharon Begley wrote an article titled, “Psychiatry group tells members they can ignore ‘Goldwater rule’ and comment on Trump’s mental health.” The article was linked to on Twitter, and the retweets and comments started to fly. As a single example, Josh Marshall, editor and publisher of Talking Points Memo, tweeted out to his 215,000 followers: “Truly amazing am psych assoc says Trump so f’ing nuts they’re lifting Goldwater Rule.” The APA issued several statements over the course of the day, notably: “We are the largest psychiatric organization in the world with more than 37,000 members. The Goldwater Rules applies to our members.” Commenters expressed frustration with the Goldwater Rule, and suggested that the APA had a duty to warn.

Shortly after noon that day, the APsaA put a statement on its website to clarify information in the STAT article: “In an email to association members, our leadership did not encourage members to defy the “Goldwater Rule” which is a part of the ethics code of a different mental health organization, the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Rather, it articulated a distinct ethics position that represents the viewpoint of psychoanalysts. The field of psychoanalysis addresses the full spectrum of human behavior, and we feel that our concepts and understanding are applicable and valuable to understanding a wide range of human behaviors and cultural phenomenon.”

Later in the afternoon, I spoke with Wylie Tene, director of pubic affairs for the APsaA. He noted: “The article in StatNews had a misleading and sensational headline. It didn’t represent what our email was about.”

I found it interesting that a sensational headline on STAT’s website could lead to so much comment and so many articles in major news outlets. July 25, 2017, was not a slow news day: John McCain (R-Ariz) returned to the Senate that day and voted to proceed with the debate to repeal Obamacare. A single vote cast by Vice President Mike Pence broke the tie, allowing the debate to go forward.

Like many, I feel conflicted about the Goldwater Rule but for a single reason: I am a strong believer in free speech, and the rule squelches psychiatrists. But as I noted in a column in August 2016, I don’t believe that our opinions should, would, or could change our political environment. Psychiatric treatment is about compassion and healing, and diagnoses are based on symptoms that patients often tell us about in a setting of intimacy and trust. Diagnosing celebrities, on the other hand, is often about name calling; it risks insulting our patients and perpetuating stigma.

Regarding Mr. Trump, I’m going to finish with the same words I wrote back in August, prior to his election as president. You’ll note that my insights in Clinical Psychiatry News and circulated on the Internet – devoid of a diagnosis – did not influence the outcome of the general election. Psychiatric diagnoses are made by observing a constellation of symptoms that occur together.

Mr. Trump has given the whole world years of data – he’s lived his life in a very public way. As a real estate developer, he has had countless employees who all know how they’ve been treated. We’ve seen him through three marriages and watched how he interacts with his children. We’ve seen him take out full-page ads calling for the death penalty for a group of young men who were wrongly convicted in the rape and assault of the Central Park jogger in 1989. If that’s not enough, he has hosted his own reality television show, and we’ve now seen him countless times in debates and rallies. We know how he treats his running mates, journalist Megyn Kelly, a news reporter with a disability, and the parents of a fallen soldier. We’ve watched him allude to the size of his genitals during a primary debate. Every individual is free to decide if Mr. Trump’s widely viewed patterns of behavior represent much-needed spunk and change with political beliefs that align with their own, or if his words and behaviors represent cruelty, impulsivity, poor judgment, and a pattern of actions that some might not feel is dignified enough for our country’s leader. No degree is required to observe and draw conclusions.
 
 

 

Dr. Miller, who practices in Baltimore, is coauthor with Annette Hanson, MD, of “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016).

 

On the morning of July 25, I scrolled through my Twitter account to see tweets flying: Psychiatrists can now defy the Goldwater Rule! Oops, wrong organization; no ,they can’t. Over the course of the day, articles appeared in Scientific American, the Los Angeles Times, Newsweek, International Business Times; and statements were issued by both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychoanalytic Association.

So what happened?

Dr. Dinah Miller
At the annual meeting of the American Psychoanalytic Association – an organization of 3,500 interdisciplinary mental health professionals – its executive councilors were polled about whether they endorsed APsaA’s existing policy that allows for the organization’s comments on sociopolitical issues and not on specific political figures. The vote was unanimous to continue with its existing policy of commenting on issues, not individuals.

On July 6, 2017, the ApsaA had sent an email to all its members informing them of this decision. The email also stated: “However, it is important to note that members of APsaA are free to comment about political figures as individuals. The American Psychiatric Association’s ethical stance on the Goldwater Rule applies to its members only. The APsaA does not consider political commentary by its individual members an ethical matter.” (Bolding per the email). This was not considered to be a change in its policy.

Citing that email, on July 25, STAT reporter Sharon Begley wrote an article titled, “Psychiatry group tells members they can ignore ‘Goldwater rule’ and comment on Trump’s mental health.” The article was linked to on Twitter, and the retweets and comments started to fly. As a single example, Josh Marshall, editor and publisher of Talking Points Memo, tweeted out to his 215,000 followers: “Truly amazing am psych assoc says Trump so f’ing nuts they’re lifting Goldwater Rule.” The APA issued several statements over the course of the day, notably: “We are the largest psychiatric organization in the world with more than 37,000 members. The Goldwater Rules applies to our members.” Commenters expressed frustration with the Goldwater Rule, and suggested that the APA had a duty to warn.

Shortly after noon that day, the APsaA put a statement on its website to clarify information in the STAT article: “In an email to association members, our leadership did not encourage members to defy the “Goldwater Rule” which is a part of the ethics code of a different mental health organization, the American Psychiatric Association (APA). Rather, it articulated a distinct ethics position that represents the viewpoint of psychoanalysts. The field of psychoanalysis addresses the full spectrum of human behavior, and we feel that our concepts and understanding are applicable and valuable to understanding a wide range of human behaviors and cultural phenomenon.”

Later in the afternoon, I spoke with Wylie Tene, director of pubic affairs for the APsaA. He noted: “The article in StatNews had a misleading and sensational headline. It didn’t represent what our email was about.”

I found it interesting that a sensational headline on STAT’s website could lead to so much comment and so many articles in major news outlets. July 25, 2017, was not a slow news day: John McCain (R-Ariz) returned to the Senate that day and voted to proceed with the debate to repeal Obamacare. A single vote cast by Vice President Mike Pence broke the tie, allowing the debate to go forward.

Like many, I feel conflicted about the Goldwater Rule but for a single reason: I am a strong believer in free speech, and the rule squelches psychiatrists. But as I noted in a column in August 2016, I don’t believe that our opinions should, would, or could change our political environment. Psychiatric treatment is about compassion and healing, and diagnoses are based on symptoms that patients often tell us about in a setting of intimacy and trust. Diagnosing celebrities, on the other hand, is often about name calling; it risks insulting our patients and perpetuating stigma.

Regarding Mr. Trump, I’m going to finish with the same words I wrote back in August, prior to his election as president. You’ll note that my insights in Clinical Psychiatry News and circulated on the Internet – devoid of a diagnosis – did not influence the outcome of the general election. Psychiatric diagnoses are made by observing a constellation of symptoms that occur together.

Mr. Trump has given the whole world years of data – he’s lived his life in a very public way. As a real estate developer, he has had countless employees who all know how they’ve been treated. We’ve seen him through three marriages and watched how he interacts with his children. We’ve seen him take out full-page ads calling for the death penalty for a group of young men who were wrongly convicted in the rape and assault of the Central Park jogger in 1989. If that’s not enough, he has hosted his own reality television show, and we’ve now seen him countless times in debates and rallies. We know how he treats his running mates, journalist Megyn Kelly, a news reporter with a disability, and the parents of a fallen soldier. We’ve watched him allude to the size of his genitals during a primary debate. Every individual is free to decide if Mr. Trump’s widely viewed patterns of behavior represent much-needed spunk and change with political beliefs that align with their own, or if his words and behaviors represent cruelty, impulsivity, poor judgment, and a pattern of actions that some might not feel is dignified enough for our country’s leader. No degree is required to observe and draw conclusions.
 
 

 

Dr. Miller, who practices in Baltimore, is coauthor with Annette Hanson, MD, of “Committed: The Battle Over Involuntary Psychiatric Care” (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016).

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Pediatric News welcomes Dr. Kelly Curran

Article Type
Changed

 

Pediatric News welcomes Kelly Curran, MD, MA, to its Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Curran is an assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, practicing adolescent medicine. Dr. Curran is member of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics, where she serves as an editorial board member for the AAP’s Adolescent Medicine PREP series. Her areas of interest include bioethics, reproductive health care, and adolescent mental health care.

Dr. Kelly Curran
She graduated from Loyola University Chicago’s Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Ill., served her residency in internal medicine and pediatrics at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and served as a clinical fellow in adolescent medicine at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. She also graduated from Loyola University with a master of arts in bioethics and health policy.
Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Pediatric News welcomes Kelly Curran, MD, MA, to its Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Curran is an assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, practicing adolescent medicine. Dr. Curran is member of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics, where she serves as an editorial board member for the AAP’s Adolescent Medicine PREP series. Her areas of interest include bioethics, reproductive health care, and adolescent mental health care.

Dr. Kelly Curran
She graduated from Loyola University Chicago’s Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Ill., served her residency in internal medicine and pediatrics at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and served as a clinical fellow in adolescent medicine at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. She also graduated from Loyola University with a master of arts in bioethics and health policy.

 

Pediatric News welcomes Kelly Curran, MD, MA, to its Editorial Advisory Board.

Dr. Curran is an assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, practicing adolescent medicine. Dr. Curran is member of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine and the American Academy of Pediatrics, where she serves as an editorial board member for the AAP’s Adolescent Medicine PREP series. Her areas of interest include bioethics, reproductive health care, and adolescent mental health care.

Dr. Kelly Curran
She graduated from Loyola University Chicago’s Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Ill., served her residency in internal medicine and pediatrics at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, and served as a clinical fellow in adolescent medicine at the Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. She also graduated from Loyola University with a master of arts in bioethics and health policy.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default