Patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) who received anticoagulation therapy had nearly fivefold greater odds of recanalization compared with untreated patients, and were no more likely to experience major or minor bleeding, in a pooled analysis of eight studies published in the August issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.042).

Rates of any recanalization were 71% in treated patients and 42% in untreated patients (P less than .0001), wrote Lorenzo Loffredo, MD, of Sapienza University, Rome, and his coinvestigators. Rates of complete recanalization were 53% and 33%, respectively (P = .002), rates of spontaneous variceal bleeding were 2% and 12% (P = .04), and bleeding affected 11% of patients in each group. Together, the findings “show that anticoagulants are efficacious and safe for treatment of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients,” although larger, interventional clinical trials are needed to pinpoint the clinical role of anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients with PVT, the reviewers reported.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Bleeding from portal hypertension is a major complication in cirrhosis, but PVT affects about 20% of patients and predicts poor outcomes, they noted. Anticoagulation in this setting can be difficult because patients often have concurrent coagulopathies that are hard to assess with standard techniques, such as PT-INR (international normalized ratio). Although some studies support anticoagulating these patients, data are limited. Therefore, the reviewers searched PubMed, the ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane database through Feb. 14, 2017, for trials comparing anticoagulation with no treatment in patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

This search yielded eight trials of 353 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, or no treatment for about 6 months, with a typical follow-up period of 2 years. The reviewers found no evidence of publication bias or significant heterogeneity among the trials. Six studies evaluated complete recanalization, another set of six studies tracked progression of PVT, a third set of six studies evaluated major or minor bleeding events, and four studies evaluated spontaneous variceal bleeding. Compared with no treatment, anticoagulation was tied to a significantly greater likelihood of complete recanalization (pooled odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-7.4; P = .002), a significantly lower chance of PVT progressing (9% vs. 33%; pooled odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.31; P less than .0001), no difference in bleeding rates (11% in each pooled group), and a significantly lower risk of spontaneous variceal bleeding (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.94; P = .04).

“Metaregression analysis showed that duration of anticoagulation did not influence outcomes,” the reviewers wrote. “Low-molecular-weight heparin, but not warfarin, was significantly associated with a complete PVT resolution as compared to untreated patients, while both low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin were effective in reducing PVT progression.” That finding merits careful interpretation, however, because most studies on warfarin were retrospective and lacked data on the quality of anticoagulation, they added.

“It is a challenge to treat patients with cirrhosis using anticoagulants because of the perception that the coexistent coagulopathy could promote bleeding,” the researchers wrote. Nonetheless, their analysis suggests that anticoagulation has significant benefits and does not increase bleeding risk, regardless of the severity of liver failure, they concluded.

The reviewers reported having no funding sources or conflicts of interest.

Patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) who received anticoagulation therapy had nearly fivefold greater odds of recanalization compared with untreated patients, and were no more likely to experience major or minor bleeding, in a pooled analysis of eight studies published in the August issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.042).

Rates of any recanalization were 71% in treated patients and 42% in untreated patients (P less than .0001), wrote Lorenzo Loffredo, MD, of Sapienza University, Rome, and his coinvestigators. Rates of complete recanalization were 53% and 33%, respectively (P = .002), rates of spontaneous variceal bleeding were 2% and 12% (P = .04), and bleeding affected 11% of patients in each group. Together, the findings “show that anticoagulants are efficacious and safe for treatment of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients,” although larger, interventional clinical trials are needed to pinpoint the clinical role of anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients with PVT, the reviewers reported.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Bleeding from portal hypertension is a major complication in cirrhosis, but PVT affects about 20% of patients and predicts poor outcomes, they noted. Anticoagulation in this setting can be difficult because patients often have concurrent coagulopathies that are hard to assess with standard techniques, such as PT-INR (international normalized ratio). Although some studies support anticoagulating these patients, data are limited. Therefore, the reviewers searched PubMed, the ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane database through Feb. 14, 2017, for trials comparing anticoagulation with no treatment in patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

This search yielded eight trials of 353 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, or no treatment for about 6 months, with a typical follow-up period of 2 years. The reviewers found no evidence of publication bias or significant heterogeneity among the trials. Six studies evaluated complete recanalization, another set of six studies tracked progression of PVT, a third set of six studies evaluated major or minor bleeding events, and four studies evaluated spontaneous variceal bleeding. Compared with no treatment, anticoagulation was tied to a significantly greater likelihood of complete recanalization (pooled odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-7.4; P = .002), a significantly lower chance of PVT progressing (9% vs. 33%; pooled odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.31; P less than .0001), no difference in bleeding rates (11% in each pooled group), and a significantly lower risk of spontaneous variceal bleeding (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.94; P = .04).

“Metaregression analysis showed that duration of anticoagulation did not influence outcomes,” the reviewers wrote. “Low-molecular-weight heparin, but not warfarin, was significantly associated with a complete PVT resolution as compared to untreated patients, while both low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin were effective in reducing PVT progression.” That finding merits careful interpretation, however, because most studies on warfarin were retrospective and lacked data on the quality of anticoagulation, they added.

“It is a challenge to treat patients with cirrhosis using anticoagulants because of the perception that the coexistent coagulopathy could promote bleeding,” the researchers wrote. Nonetheless, their analysis suggests that anticoagulation has significant benefits and does not increase bleeding risk, regardless of the severity of liver failure, they concluded.

The reviewers reported having no funding sources or conflicts of interest.

Patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) who received anticoagulation therapy had nearly fivefold greater odds of recanalization compared with untreated patients, and were no more likely to experience major or minor bleeding, in a pooled analysis of eight studies published in the August issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.042).

Rates of any recanalization were 71% in treated patients and 42% in untreated patients (P less than .0001), wrote Lorenzo Loffredo, MD, of Sapienza University, Rome, and his coinvestigators. Rates of complete recanalization were 53% and 33%, respectively (P = .002), rates of spontaneous variceal bleeding were 2% and 12% (P = .04), and bleeding affected 11% of patients in each group. Together, the findings “show that anticoagulants are efficacious and safe for treatment of portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients,” although larger, interventional clinical trials are needed to pinpoint the clinical role of anticoagulation in cirrhotic patients with PVT, the reviewers reported.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Bleeding from portal hypertension is a major complication in cirrhosis, but PVT affects about 20% of patients and predicts poor outcomes, they noted. Anticoagulation in this setting can be difficult because patients often have concurrent coagulopathies that are hard to assess with standard techniques, such as PT-INR (international normalized ratio). Although some studies support anticoagulating these patients, data are limited. Therefore, the reviewers searched PubMed, the ISI Web of Science, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane database through Feb. 14, 2017, for trials comparing anticoagulation with no treatment in patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

This search yielded eight trials of 353 patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin, warfarin, or no treatment for about 6 months, with a typical follow-up period of 2 years. The reviewers found no evidence of publication bias or significant heterogeneity among the trials. Six studies evaluated complete recanalization, another set of six studies tracked progression of PVT, a third set of six studies evaluated major or minor bleeding events, and four studies evaluated spontaneous variceal bleeding. Compared with no treatment, anticoagulation was tied to a significantly greater likelihood of complete recanalization (pooled odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-7.4; P = .002), a significantly lower chance of PVT progressing (9% vs. 33%; pooled odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.31; P less than .0001), no difference in bleeding rates (11% in each pooled group), and a significantly lower risk of spontaneous variceal bleeding (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.94; P = .04).

“Metaregression analysis showed that duration of anticoagulation did not influence outcomes,” the reviewers wrote. “Low-molecular-weight heparin, but not warfarin, was significantly associated with a complete PVT resolution as compared to untreated patients, while both low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin were effective in reducing PVT progression.” That finding merits careful interpretation, however, because most studies on warfarin were retrospective and lacked data on the quality of anticoagulation, they added.

“It is a challenge to treat patients with cirrhosis using anticoagulants because of the perception that the coexistent coagulopathy could promote bleeding,” the researchers wrote. Nonetheless, their analysis suggests that anticoagulation has significant benefits and does not increase bleeding risk, regardless of the severity of liver failure, they concluded.

The reviewers reported having no funding sources or conflicts of interest.

What do your patients need to know?

Vascular instability associated with rosacea is exacerbated by triggers such as sunlight, hot drinks, spicy foods, stress, and rapid changing weather, which make patients flush and blush, increase the appearance of telangiectasia, and disrupt the normal skin barrier. Because the patients feel on fire, an anti-inflammatory approach is indicated. The regimen I recommend includes mild cleansers, barrier repair creams and supplements, antioxidants (topical and oral), and sun protection, all without parabens and harsh chemicals. I always recommend a product that I dispense at the office and another one of similar effectiveness that can be found over-the-counter.

What are your go-to treatments?

Cleansing is indispensable to maintain the normal flow in and out of the skin. I recommend mild cleansers without potentially sensitizing agents such as propylene glycol or parabens. It also should have calming agents (eg, fruit extracts) that remove the contaminants from the skin surface without stripping the important layers of lipids that constitute the barrier of the skin as well as ingredients (eg, prebiotics) that promote the healthy skin biome. Selenium in thermal spring water has free radical scavenging and anti-inflammatory properties as well as protection against heavy metals.

After cleansing, I recommend a product to repair, maintain, and improve the barrier of the skin. A healthy skin barrier has an equal ratio of cholesterol, ceramides, and free fatty acids, the building blocks of the skin. In a barrier repair cream I look for ingredients that stop and prevent damaging inflammation, improve the skin's natural ability to repair and heal (eg, niacinamide), and protect against environmental insults. It should contain petrolatum and/or dimethicone to form a protective barrier on the skin to seal in moisture.

Oral niacinamide should be taken as a photoprotective agent. Oral supplementation (500 mg twice daily) is effective in reducing skin cancer. Because UV light is a trigger factor, oral photoprotection is recommended.

Topical antioxidants also are important. Free radical formation has been documented even in photoprotected skin. These free radicals have been implicated in skin cancer development and metalloproteinase production and are triggers of rosacea. As a result, I advise my patients to apply topical encapsulated vitamin C every night. The encapsulated form prevents oxidation of the product before application. In addition, I recommend oral vitamin C (1 g daily) and vitamin E (400 U daily).

For sun protection I recommend sunblocks with titanium dioxide and zinc oxide for total UVA and UVB protection. If the patient has a darker skin type, sun protection should contain iron oxide. Chemical agents can cause irritation, photocontact dermatitis, and exacerbation of rosacea symptoms. Daily application of sun protection with reapplication every 2 hours is reinforced. 

What holistic therapies do you recommend?

Stress reduction activities, including yoga, relaxation, massages, and meditation, can help. Oral consumption of trigger factors is discouraged. Antioxidant green tea is recommended instead of caffeinated beverages. 

Suggested Readings 

Baldwin HE, Bathia ND, Friedman A, et al. The role of cutaneous microbiota harmony in maintaining functional skin barrier. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16:12-18.

Celerier P, Richard A, Litoux P, et al. Modulatory effects of selenium and strontium salts on keratinocyte-derived inflammatory cytokines. Arch Dermatol Res. 1995;287:680-682.

Chen AC, Martin AJ, Choy B, et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of nicotinamide for skin cancer chemoprevention. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1618-1626.

Jones D. Reactive oxygen species and rosacea. Cutis. 2004;74(suppl 3):17-20.

What do your patients need to know?

Vascular instability associated with rosacea is exacerbated by triggers such as sunlight, hot drinks, spicy foods, stress, and rapid changing weather, which make patients flush and blush, increase the appearance of telangiectasia, and disrupt the normal skin barrier. Because the patients feel on fire, an anti-inflammatory approach is indicated. The regimen I recommend includes mild cleansers, barrier repair creams and supplements, antioxidants (topical and oral), and sun protection, all without parabens and harsh chemicals. I always recommend a product that I dispense at the office and another one of similar effectiveness that can be found over-the-counter.

What are your go-to treatments?

Cleansing is indispensable to maintain the normal flow in and out of the skin. I recommend mild cleansers without potentially sensitizing agents such as propylene glycol or parabens. It also should have calming agents (eg, fruit extracts) that remove the contaminants from the skin surface without stripping the important layers of lipids that constitute the barrier of the skin as well as ingredients (eg, prebiotics) that promote the healthy skin biome. Selenium in thermal spring water has free radical scavenging and anti-inflammatory properties as well as protection against heavy metals.

After cleansing, I recommend a product to repair, maintain, and improve the barrier of the skin. A healthy skin barrier has an equal ratio of cholesterol, ceramides, and free fatty acids, the building blocks of the skin. In a barrier repair cream I look for ingredients that stop and prevent damaging inflammation, improve the skin's natural ability to repair and heal (eg, niacinamide), and protect against environmental insults. It should contain petrolatum and/or dimethicone to form a protective barrier on the skin to seal in moisture.

Oral niacinamide should be taken as a photoprotective agent. Oral supplementation (500 mg twice daily) is effective in reducing skin cancer. Because UV light is a trigger factor, oral photoprotection is recommended.

Topical antioxidants also are important. Free radical formation has been documented even in photoprotected skin. These free radicals have been implicated in skin cancer development and metalloproteinase production and are triggers of rosacea. As a result, I advise my patients to apply topical encapsulated vitamin C every night. The encapsulated form prevents oxidation of the product before application. In addition, I recommend oral vitamin C (1 g daily) and vitamin E (400 U daily).

For sun protection I recommend sunblocks with titanium dioxide and zinc oxide for total UVA and UVB protection. If the patient has a darker skin type, sun protection should contain iron oxide. Chemical agents can cause irritation, photocontact dermatitis, and exacerbation of rosacea symptoms. Daily application of sun protection with reapplication every 2 hours is reinforced. 

What holistic therapies do you recommend?

Stress reduction activities, including yoga, relaxation, massages, and meditation, can help. Oral consumption of trigger factors is discouraged. Antioxidant green tea is recommended instead of caffeinated beverages. 

Suggested Readings 

Baldwin HE, Bathia ND, Friedman A, et al. The role of cutaneous microbiota harmony in maintaining functional skin barrier. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16:12-18.

Celerier P, Richard A, Litoux P, et al. Modulatory effects of selenium and strontium salts on keratinocyte-derived inflammatory cytokines. Arch Dermatol Res. 1995;287:680-682.

Chen AC, Martin AJ, Choy B, et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of nicotinamide for skin cancer chemoprevention. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1618-1626.

Jones D. Reactive oxygen species and rosacea. Cutis. 2004;74(suppl 3):17-20.

What do your patients need to know?

Vascular instability associated with rosacea is exacerbated by triggers such as sunlight, hot drinks, spicy foods, stress, and rapid changing weather, which make patients flush and blush, increase the appearance of telangiectasia, and disrupt the normal skin barrier. Because the patients feel on fire, an anti-inflammatory approach is indicated. The regimen I recommend includes mild cleansers, barrier repair creams and supplements, antioxidants (topical and oral), and sun protection, all without parabens and harsh chemicals. I always recommend a product that I dispense at the office and another one of similar effectiveness that can be found over-the-counter.

What are your go-to treatments?

Cleansing is indispensable to maintain the normal flow in and out of the skin. I recommend mild cleansers without potentially sensitizing agents such as propylene glycol or parabens. It also should have calming agents (eg, fruit extracts) that remove the contaminants from the skin surface without stripping the important layers of lipids that constitute the barrier of the skin as well as ingredients (eg, prebiotics) that promote the healthy skin biome. Selenium in thermal spring water has free radical scavenging and anti-inflammatory properties as well as protection against heavy metals.

After cleansing, I recommend a product to repair, maintain, and improve the barrier of the skin. A healthy skin barrier has an equal ratio of cholesterol, ceramides, and free fatty acids, the building blocks of the skin. In a barrier repair cream I look for ingredients that stop and prevent damaging inflammation, improve the skin's natural ability to repair and heal (eg, niacinamide), and protect against environmental insults. It should contain petrolatum and/or dimethicone to form a protective barrier on the skin to seal in moisture.

Oral niacinamide should be taken as a photoprotective agent. Oral supplementation (500 mg twice daily) is effective in reducing skin cancer. Because UV light is a trigger factor, oral photoprotection is recommended.

Topical antioxidants also are important. Free radical formation has been documented even in photoprotected skin. These free radicals have been implicated in skin cancer development and metalloproteinase production and are triggers of rosacea. As a result, I advise my patients to apply topical encapsulated vitamin C every night. The encapsulated form prevents oxidation of the product before application. In addition, I recommend oral vitamin C (1 g daily) and vitamin E (400 U daily).

For sun protection I recommend sunblocks with titanium dioxide and zinc oxide for total UVA and UVB protection. If the patient has a darker skin type, sun protection should contain iron oxide. Chemical agents can cause irritation, photocontact dermatitis, and exacerbation of rosacea symptoms. Daily application of sun protection with reapplication every 2 hours is reinforced. 

What holistic therapies do you recommend?

Stress reduction activities, including yoga, relaxation, massages, and meditation, can help. Oral consumption of trigger factors is discouraged. Antioxidant green tea is recommended instead of caffeinated beverages. 

Suggested Readings 

Baldwin HE, Bathia ND, Friedman A, et al. The role of cutaneous microbiota harmony in maintaining functional skin barrier. J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16:12-18.

Celerier P, Richard A, Litoux P, et al. Modulatory effects of selenium and strontium salts on keratinocyte-derived inflammatory cytokines. Arch Dermatol Res. 1995;287:680-682.

Chen AC, Martin AJ, Choy B, et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of nicotinamide for skin cancer chemoprevention. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1618-1626.

Jones D. Reactive oxygen species and rosacea. Cutis. 2004;74(suppl 3):17-20.

Myth: Itching is not a symptom of acne

Acne vulgaris typically is not considered to be a pruritic disease; however, many patients experience itching, which leads them to scratch their acne lesions, causing secondary bacterial infections and subsequent scarring, hypopigmentation, or hyperpigmentation of the involved skin. Although itching rarely is mentioned as a clinical feature of acne, pruritus can be an important contributory factor to the burden of disability and impaired quality of life in acne patients of all ages, and acne itching may be an important target for therapy.

In a descriptive study of 120 consecutive acne patients in Singapore, itch was found to be a common (70% of patients) and debilitating symptom of acne. The majority of patients (83%) reported itch at noon with severity that was comparable to a mosquito bite, and the most common physical descriptor was tickling (68%). Common aggravating factors included sweat (71%), heat (62%), and stress (31%). Fifty-five percent of patients said itching had a negative impact on their mood, and 52% reported that they had scratched or rubbed the affected area.

A study of 108 adolescents with acne limited to the face yielded half who reported itching within acne lesions. The presence of itching was unrelated to age, gender, where they lived, positive family history, or acne severity. In most patients, pruritus appeared relatively infrequently and for a short period of time: 7.4% reported itching every day, 24.1% on a weekly basis, 29.6% at least once a month, and 37.7% even less frequently. Itch episodes lasted less than 1 minute in most participants. However, 31.5% of participants sought medical treatment to reduce itching. The most important factors aggravating the intensity of itching were sweat, stress, physical effort, heat, fatigue, and dry air, respectively.

Regarding the impact of acne itching on quality of life, 29.6% of participants felt depressed and 1.8% were anxious because of their itching. Some participants also noted that itching caused difficulties in falling asleep and awakening from itching.

The pathogenesis of localized itching in acne could be connected with the change in pH of the microenvironment of the acne follicle, providing an optimal environment for the production of histamine or histaminelike products by Propionibacterium acnes. Pruritus also may be a complication of certain acne therapies. Increased awareness among patients of this potential side effect may be helpful in preventing the unnecessary discontinuation of an otherwise effective acne therapy. Understanding factors that may aggravate itching in acne lesions also may be helpful to patients.

Myth: Itching is not a symptom of acne

Acne vulgaris typically is not considered to be a pruritic disease; however, many patients experience itching, which leads them to scratch their acne lesions, causing secondary bacterial infections and subsequent scarring, hypopigmentation, or hyperpigmentation of the involved skin. Although itching rarely is mentioned as a clinical feature of acne, pruritus can be an important contributory factor to the burden of disability and impaired quality of life in acne patients of all ages, and acne itching may be an important target for therapy.

In a descriptive study of 120 consecutive acne patients in Singapore, itch was found to be a common (70% of patients) and debilitating symptom of acne. The majority of patients (83%) reported itch at noon with severity that was comparable to a mosquito bite, and the most common physical descriptor was tickling (68%). Common aggravating factors included sweat (71%), heat (62%), and stress (31%). Fifty-five percent of patients said itching had a negative impact on their mood, and 52% reported that they had scratched or rubbed the affected area.

A study of 108 adolescents with acne limited to the face yielded half who reported itching within acne lesions. The presence of itching was unrelated to age, gender, where they lived, positive family history, or acne severity. In most patients, pruritus appeared relatively infrequently and for a short period of time: 7.4% reported itching every day, 24.1% on a weekly basis, 29.6% at least once a month, and 37.7% even less frequently. Itch episodes lasted less than 1 minute in most participants. However, 31.5% of participants sought medical treatment to reduce itching. The most important factors aggravating the intensity of itching were sweat, stress, physical effort, heat, fatigue, and dry air, respectively.

Regarding the impact of acne itching on quality of life, 29.6% of participants felt depressed and 1.8% were anxious because of their itching. Some participants also noted that itching caused difficulties in falling asleep and awakening from itching.

The pathogenesis of localized itching in acne could be connected with the change in pH of the microenvironment of the acne follicle, providing an optimal environment for the production of histamine or histaminelike products by Propionibacterium acnes. Pruritus also may be a complication of certain acne therapies. Increased awareness among patients of this potential side effect may be helpful in preventing the unnecessary discontinuation of an otherwise effective acne therapy. Understanding factors that may aggravate itching in acne lesions also may be helpful to patients.

Myth: Itching is not a symptom of acne

Acne vulgaris typically is not considered to be a pruritic disease; however, many patients experience itching, which leads them to scratch their acne lesions, causing secondary bacterial infections and subsequent scarring, hypopigmentation, or hyperpigmentation of the involved skin. Although itching rarely is mentioned as a clinical feature of acne, pruritus can be an important contributory factor to the burden of disability and impaired quality of life in acne patients of all ages, and acne itching may be an important target for therapy.

In a descriptive study of 120 consecutive acne patients in Singapore, itch was found to be a common (70% of patients) and debilitating symptom of acne. The majority of patients (83%) reported itch at noon with severity that was comparable to a mosquito bite, and the most common physical descriptor was tickling (68%). Common aggravating factors included sweat (71%), heat (62%), and stress (31%). Fifty-five percent of patients said itching had a negative impact on their mood, and 52% reported that they had scratched or rubbed the affected area.

A study of 108 adolescents with acne limited to the face yielded half who reported itching within acne lesions. The presence of itching was unrelated to age, gender, where they lived, positive family history, or acne severity. In most patients, pruritus appeared relatively infrequently and for a short period of time: 7.4% reported itching every day, 24.1% on a weekly basis, 29.6% at least once a month, and 37.7% even less frequently. Itch episodes lasted less than 1 minute in most participants. However, 31.5% of participants sought medical treatment to reduce itching. The most important factors aggravating the intensity of itching were sweat, stress, physical effort, heat, fatigue, and dry air, respectively.

Regarding the impact of acne itching on quality of life, 29.6% of participants felt depressed and 1.8% were anxious because of their itching. Some participants also noted that itching caused difficulties in falling asleep and awakening from itching.

The pathogenesis of localized itching in acne could be connected with the change in pH of the microenvironment of the acne follicle, providing an optimal environment for the production of histamine or histaminelike products by Propionibacterium acnes. Pruritus also may be a complication of certain acne therapies. Increased awareness among patients of this potential side effect may be helpful in preventing the unnecessary discontinuation of an otherwise effective acne therapy. Understanding factors that may aggravate itching in acne lesions also may be helpful to patients.

Ankle effusions can be quite debilitating, causing band-like swelling and stiffness to the anterior aspect of ankle at the tibiotalar joint. Significant swelling can impair ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. The differential diagnosis for joint effusions is wide, and includes traumatic effusion; gout; osteoarthritis; rheumatoid arthritis; and septic arthritis, which is one of the most important diagnoses for the emergency physician (EP) to identify and initiate prompt treatment to reduce the risk of serious morbidity and mortality. Differentiating these conditions requires joint aspiration and synovial fluid analysis. While a large effusion will be palpable and likely ballotable, smaller effusions are more challenging clinically. In such cases, point-of-care (POC) ultrasound can be a valuable tool in confirming a joint effusion.

Identifying Landmarks and Tibiotalar Joint

To access the tibiotalar joint space, it is important to identify useful landmarks.¹ This is best accomplished by having the patient in the supine position, with the affected knee flexed approximately 90° and plantar surface of the foot lying flat on the bed (Figure 1).

Performing the Arthrocentesis

The arthrocentesis is performed under sterile conditions using the high-frequency linear probe. A sterile probe cover is highly recommended if the operator will be using ultrasound to guide the procedure in real time.² Using the palpable landmarks as a guide, the clinician should align the probe just medial to the tibialis anterior tendon with the probe marker oriented cephalad; scanning should begin superior to the ankle joint. The tibia will appear as a hyperechoic stripe just under a thin soft tissue layer. When the tibia is visible, the clinician should then slide the probe distally. The joint space will demonstrated by visualization of the distal tibia and talus bone (Figure 3).

Pearls and Pitfalls

Point-of-care ultrasound is not only useful to guide arthrocentesis of joint effusions, but also to confirm the presence of an effusion prior to aspiration. At our institution, we have had many cases in which POC ultrasound demonstrated an absence of effusion, and we were able to avoid an unnecessary joint aspiration. Moreover, when an effusion is present, POC ultrasound-guided aspiration avoids complications. The use of POC ultrasound can also increase the confidence of the provider performing arthrocentesis of joints less commonly aspirated.

Summary

Joint aspiration is an important procedural tool for EPs, especially when used to rule out life-threatening conditions such as septic arthritis. Deeper joints and small fluid collections, however, can be difficult to access without image guidance. In the ED setting, POC ultrasound provides a widely available, easy-to-use, low-cost tool to increase the likelihood of success while minimizing damage to adjacent structures.

Ankle effusions can be quite debilitating, causing band-like swelling and stiffness to the anterior aspect of ankle at the tibiotalar joint. Significant swelling can impair ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. The differential diagnosis for joint effusions is wide, and includes traumatic effusion; gout; osteoarthritis; rheumatoid arthritis; and septic arthritis, which is one of the most important diagnoses for the emergency physician (EP) to identify and initiate prompt treatment to reduce the risk of serious morbidity and mortality. Differentiating these conditions requires joint aspiration and synovial fluid analysis. While a large effusion will be palpable and likely ballotable, smaller effusions are more challenging clinically. In such cases, point-of-care (POC) ultrasound can be a valuable tool in confirming a joint effusion.

Identifying Landmarks and Tibiotalar Joint

To access the tibiotalar joint space, it is important to identify useful landmarks.¹ This is best accomplished by having the patient in the supine position, with the affected knee flexed approximately 90° and plantar surface of the foot lying flat on the bed (Figure 1).

Performing the Arthrocentesis

The arthrocentesis is performed under sterile conditions using the high-frequency linear probe. A sterile probe cover is highly recommended if the operator will be using ultrasound to guide the procedure in real time.² Using the palpable landmarks as a guide, the clinician should align the probe just medial to the tibialis anterior tendon with the probe marker oriented cephalad; scanning should begin superior to the ankle joint. The tibia will appear as a hyperechoic stripe just under a thin soft tissue layer. When the tibia is visible, the clinician should then slide the probe distally. The joint space will demonstrated by visualization of the distal tibia and talus bone (Figure 3).

Pearls and Pitfalls

Point-of-care ultrasound is not only useful to guide arthrocentesis of joint effusions, but also to confirm the presence of an effusion prior to aspiration. At our institution, we have had many cases in which POC ultrasound demonstrated an absence of effusion, and we were able to avoid an unnecessary joint aspiration. Moreover, when an effusion is present, POC ultrasound-guided aspiration avoids complications. The use of POC ultrasound can also increase the confidence of the provider performing arthrocentesis of joints less commonly aspirated.

Summary

Joint aspiration is an important procedural tool for EPs, especially when used to rule out life-threatening conditions such as septic arthritis. Deeper joints and small fluid collections, however, can be difficult to access without image guidance. In the ED setting, POC ultrasound provides a widely available, easy-to-use, low-cost tool to increase the likelihood of success while minimizing damage to adjacent structures.

Ankle effusions can be quite debilitating, causing band-like swelling and stiffness to the anterior aspect of ankle at the tibiotalar joint. Significant swelling can impair ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. The differential diagnosis for joint effusions is wide, and includes traumatic effusion; gout; osteoarthritis; rheumatoid arthritis; and septic arthritis, which is one of the most important diagnoses for the emergency physician (EP) to identify and initiate prompt treatment to reduce the risk of serious morbidity and mortality. Differentiating these conditions requires joint aspiration and synovial fluid analysis. While a large effusion will be palpable and likely ballotable, smaller effusions are more challenging clinically. In such cases, point-of-care (POC) ultrasound can be a valuable tool in confirming a joint effusion.

Identifying Landmarks and Tibiotalar Joint

To access the tibiotalar joint space, it is important to identify useful landmarks.¹ This is best accomplished by having the patient in the supine position, with the affected knee flexed approximately 90° and plantar surface of the foot lying flat on the bed (Figure 1).

Performing the Arthrocentesis

The arthrocentesis is performed under sterile conditions using the high-frequency linear probe. A sterile probe cover is highly recommended if the operator will be using ultrasound to guide the procedure in real time.² Using the palpable landmarks as a guide, the clinician should align the probe just medial to the tibialis anterior tendon with the probe marker oriented cephalad; scanning should begin superior to the ankle joint. The tibia will appear as a hyperechoic stripe just under a thin soft tissue layer. When the tibia is visible, the clinician should then slide the probe distally. The joint space will demonstrated by visualization of the distal tibia and talus bone (Figure 3).

Pearls and Pitfalls

Point-of-care ultrasound is not only useful to guide arthrocentesis of joint effusions, but also to confirm the presence of an effusion prior to aspiration. At our institution, we have had many cases in which POC ultrasound demonstrated an absence of effusion, and we were able to avoid an unnecessary joint aspiration. Moreover, when an effusion is present, POC ultrasound-guided aspiration avoids complications. The use of POC ultrasound can also increase the confidence of the provider performing arthrocentesis of joints less commonly aspirated.

Summary

Joint aspiration is an important procedural tool for EPs, especially when used to rule out life-threatening conditions such as septic arthritis. Deeper joints and small fluid collections, however, can be difficult to access without image guidance. In the ED setting, POC ultrasound provides a widely available, easy-to-use, low-cost tool to increase the likelihood of success while minimizing damage to adjacent structures.

Genetic factors accounted for about 40% of variability in the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an analysis of monozygotic and same-sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer to reported in the August issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2017 Jan. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.041).

Thus, CRC “has a substantial heritable component, and may be more heritable in women than men,” Rebecca E. Graff, ScD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, and the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues wrote. “Siblings, and particularly monozygotic cotwins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening,” they added.

©Christian Jasiuk/Thinkstock

Genetic factors accounted for about 40% of variability in the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an analysis of monozygotic and same-sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer to reported in the August issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2017 Jan. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.041).

Thus, CRC “has a substantial heritable component, and may be more heritable in women than men,” Rebecca E. Graff, ScD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, and the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues wrote. “Siblings, and particularly monozygotic cotwins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening,” they added.

©Christian Jasiuk/Thinkstock

Genetic factors accounted for about 40% of variability in the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in an analysis of monozygotic and same-sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer to reported in the August issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (2017 Jan. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.041).

Thus, CRC “has a substantial heritable component, and may be more heritable in women than men,” Rebecca E. Graff, ScD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, and the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues wrote. “Siblings, and particularly monozygotic cotwins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening,” they added.

©Christian Jasiuk/Thinkstock

Endoscopists who took about a minute longer during screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) detected significantly more upper gastrointestinal neoplasms than their quicker colleagues, in a retrospective study reported in the August issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.009).

Detection rates were 0.28% and 0.20%, respectively (P = .005), and this difference remained statistically significant after the investigators controlled for numerous factors that also can affect the chances of detecting gastric neoplasms during upper endoscopy, reported Jae Myung Park, MD, and his colleagues at Seoul (Korea) St. Mary’s Hospital.

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, they noted. Although EGD has been practiced globally for decades, there is no consensus on which performance metrics optimize diagnostic yield. Both Korea and Japan have adopted screening EGD to help diagnose gastric cancer, but interval cancers and false-positive results remain concerns, and the field lacks rigorous analyses comparing EGD time with gastric cancer detection rates. Therefore, the researchers studied 111,962 consecutive patients who underwent EGD at one hospital in Seoul from 2009 through 2015. Fourteen board-certified endoscopists performed these procedures at a single endoscopy unit.A total of 262 patients (0.23%) were diagnosed with gastric neoplasia or dysplasia, duodenal neoplasia, or esophageal carcinoma. This finding closely resembled a prior report from Korea, the investigators noted. Detection rates among individual endoscopists ranged from 0.14% to 0.32%, and longer EGD time was associated with a higher detection rate with an R value of 0.54 (P = .046). During the first year of the study, EGDs without biopsies averaged 2 minutes, 53 seconds. Based on this finding, the researchers set a cutoff time of 3 minutes and classified eight endoscopists as fast (mean EGD duration, 2 minutes and 38 seconds; standard deviation, 21 seconds) and six endoscopists as slow (mean duration, 3 minutes and 25 seconds; SD, 19 seconds). Slower endoscopists were significantly more likely to detect gastric adenomas or carcinomas, even after the investigators controlled for the biopsy rates and experience level of these endoscopists and patients’ age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use, and family history of cancer (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.97; P = .0018).

Older age, male sex, and smoking also were significant correlates of cancer detection in the multivariable model. Biopsy rates among endoscopists ranged from 7% to 28%, and taking a biopsy was an even stronger predictor of detecting an upper GI neoplasm than was EGD duration, with an R value of 0.76 (P = .002). Although this study was observational and retrospective and lacked data on prior EGD examinations, surveillance intervals, and rates of false-negative results, it “supports the hypothesis that examination duration affects the diagnostic accuracy of EGD,” Dr. Park and his coinvestigators reported. “Prolonging the examination time will allow more careful examination by the endoscopist, which will enable the detection of more subtle lesions. Based on our data, we believe that these indicators can improve the quality of EGD.”

Funders included the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology; the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning; and the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

Endoscopists who took about a minute longer during screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) detected significantly more upper gastrointestinal neoplasms than their quicker colleagues, in a retrospective study reported in the August issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.009).

Detection rates were 0.28% and 0.20%, respectively (P = .005), and this difference remained statistically significant after the investigators controlled for numerous factors that also can affect the chances of detecting gastric neoplasms during upper endoscopy, reported Jae Myung Park, MD, and his colleagues at Seoul (Korea) St. Mary’s Hospital.

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, they noted. Although EGD has been practiced globally for decades, there is no consensus on which performance metrics optimize diagnostic yield. Both Korea and Japan have adopted screening EGD to help diagnose gastric cancer, but interval cancers and false-positive results remain concerns, and the field lacks rigorous analyses comparing EGD time with gastric cancer detection rates. Therefore, the researchers studied 111,962 consecutive patients who underwent EGD at one hospital in Seoul from 2009 through 2015. Fourteen board-certified endoscopists performed these procedures at a single endoscopy unit.A total of 262 patients (0.23%) were diagnosed with gastric neoplasia or dysplasia, duodenal neoplasia, or esophageal carcinoma. This finding closely resembled a prior report from Korea, the investigators noted. Detection rates among individual endoscopists ranged from 0.14% to 0.32%, and longer EGD time was associated with a higher detection rate with an R value of 0.54 (P = .046). During the first year of the study, EGDs without biopsies averaged 2 minutes, 53 seconds. Based on this finding, the researchers set a cutoff time of 3 minutes and classified eight endoscopists as fast (mean EGD duration, 2 minutes and 38 seconds; standard deviation, 21 seconds) and six endoscopists as slow (mean duration, 3 minutes and 25 seconds; SD, 19 seconds). Slower endoscopists were significantly more likely to detect gastric adenomas or carcinomas, even after the investigators controlled for the biopsy rates and experience level of these endoscopists and patients’ age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use, and family history of cancer (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.97; P = .0018).

Older age, male sex, and smoking also were significant correlates of cancer detection in the multivariable model. Biopsy rates among endoscopists ranged from 7% to 28%, and taking a biopsy was an even stronger predictor of detecting an upper GI neoplasm than was EGD duration, with an R value of 0.76 (P = .002). Although this study was observational and retrospective and lacked data on prior EGD examinations, surveillance intervals, and rates of false-negative results, it “supports the hypothesis that examination duration affects the diagnostic accuracy of EGD,” Dr. Park and his coinvestigators reported. “Prolonging the examination time will allow more careful examination by the endoscopist, which will enable the detection of more subtle lesions. Based on our data, we believe that these indicators can improve the quality of EGD.”

Funders included the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology; the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning; and the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

Endoscopists who took about a minute longer during screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) detected significantly more upper gastrointestinal neoplasms than their quicker colleagues, in a retrospective study reported in the August issue of Gastroenterology (doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.009).

Detection rates were 0.28% and 0.20%, respectively (P = .005), and this difference remained statistically significant after the investigators controlled for numerous factors that also can affect the chances of detecting gastric neoplasms during upper endoscopy, reported Jae Myung Park, MD, and his colleagues at Seoul (Korea) St. Mary’s Hospital.

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, they noted. Although EGD has been practiced globally for decades, there is no consensus on which performance metrics optimize diagnostic yield. Both Korea and Japan have adopted screening EGD to help diagnose gastric cancer, but interval cancers and false-positive results remain concerns, and the field lacks rigorous analyses comparing EGD time with gastric cancer detection rates. Therefore, the researchers studied 111,962 consecutive patients who underwent EGD at one hospital in Seoul from 2009 through 2015. Fourteen board-certified endoscopists performed these procedures at a single endoscopy unit.A total of 262 patients (0.23%) were diagnosed with gastric neoplasia or dysplasia, duodenal neoplasia, or esophageal carcinoma. This finding closely resembled a prior report from Korea, the investigators noted. Detection rates among individual endoscopists ranged from 0.14% to 0.32%, and longer EGD time was associated with a higher detection rate with an R value of 0.54 (P = .046). During the first year of the study, EGDs without biopsies averaged 2 minutes, 53 seconds. Based on this finding, the researchers set a cutoff time of 3 minutes and classified eight endoscopists as fast (mean EGD duration, 2 minutes and 38 seconds; standard deviation, 21 seconds) and six endoscopists as slow (mean duration, 3 minutes and 25 seconds; SD, 19 seconds). Slower endoscopists were significantly more likely to detect gastric adenomas or carcinomas, even after the investigators controlled for the biopsy rates and experience level of these endoscopists and patients’ age, sex, smoking status, alcohol use, and family history of cancer (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.97; P = .0018).

Older age, male sex, and smoking also were significant correlates of cancer detection in the multivariable model. Biopsy rates among endoscopists ranged from 7% to 28%, and taking a biopsy was an even stronger predictor of detecting an upper GI neoplasm than was EGD duration, with an R value of 0.76 (P = .002). Although this study was observational and retrospective and lacked data on prior EGD examinations, surveillance intervals, and rates of false-negative results, it “supports the hypothesis that examination duration affects the diagnostic accuracy of EGD,” Dr. Park and his coinvestigators reported. “Prolonging the examination time will allow more careful examination by the endoscopist, which will enable the detection of more subtle lesions. Based on our data, we believe that these indicators can improve the quality of EGD.”

Funders included the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology; the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning; and the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea. The investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.

SAN FRANCISCO – Teens who answered “no response” for one or more questions during a standard suicide screening in the ED typically have a risk of suicide nearly on par with those who answered “yes” to at least one question, results of a study showed.

“Risk for suicidality was substantial among both groups,” Tricia Hengehold of the University of Cincinnati reported at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “About half of each group fit the medium-risk category, although the yes group had more teens in the high-risk category comparatively.”

Devonyu/Thinkstock

[email protected]

SAN FRANCISCO – Teens who answered “no response” for one or more questions during a standard suicide screening in the ED typically have a risk of suicide nearly on par with those who answered “yes” to at least one question, results of a study showed.

“Risk for suicidality was substantial among both groups,” Tricia Hengehold of the University of Cincinnati reported at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “About half of each group fit the medium-risk category, although the yes group had more teens in the high-risk category comparatively.”

Devonyu/Thinkstock

[email protected]

SAN FRANCISCO – Teens who answered “no response” for one or more questions during a standard suicide screening in the ED typically have a risk of suicide nearly on par with those who answered “yes” to at least one question, results of a study showed.

“Risk for suicidality was substantial among both groups,” Tricia Hengehold of the University of Cincinnati reported at the Pediatric Academic Societies meeting. “About half of each group fit the medium-risk category, although the yes group had more teens in the high-risk category comparatively.”

Devonyu/Thinkstock

[email protected]

Case

An Asian man in his third decade, with a medical history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and who had recently been involved in a motor vehicle collision (MVC), presented to the ED with a chief complaint of severe bilateral upper and lower extremity weakness. The patient noted that the weakness had begun the previous evening and became progressively worse throughout the night, to the point that he was unable to move any of his extremities on the morning of presentation.

Upon arrival at the ED, the patient was awake, alert, and oriented to self, time, and place; he also spoke in full sentences without distress. He denied fever, chills, difficulty breathing, or preceding viral illness. The patient stated that he was not taking any medications and denied a history of alcohol, tobacco, or drug abuse.

Initial vital signs at presentation were: blood pressure, 141/50 mm Hg; heart rate, 90 beats/min; respiratory rate, 16 breaths/min; and temperature, 97.4°F. Oxygen saturation was 100% on room air. On physical examination, the patient was in no acute distress and had a normal mental status. His pupils were normally reactive and his other cranial nerves were normal. Muscle strength in the upper and lower extremities was 1/5 with 1+ reflexes bilaterally, and there was no sensory deficit. The patient was placed on continuous cardiac monitoring with pulse oximetry.

What is the differential diagnosis for acute extremity weakness or paralysis?

The differential diagnosis for acute symmetrical extremity weakness or paralysis is broad and includes conditions of neurological, inflammatory, and toxic/metabolic etiologies.¹ Neurological diagnoses to consider include acute stroke, specifically of the anterior cerebral or middle cerebral artery territories; Guillain-Barré syndrome; myasthenia gravis; spinal cord compression; and tick paralysis. Acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke most frequently presents with unilateral upper or lower extremity weakness accompanied by garbled speech and sensory deficits. Patients who have suffered a brainstem or cerebellar stroke commonly present with alterations of consciousness, visual changes, and ataxia. Posterior circulation strokes are also characterized by crossed neurological deficits, such as motor deficits on one side of the body and sensory deficits on the other.

Spinal Cord Pathology. Signs and symptoms of spinal cord compression or inflammation vary widely depending on the level affected. Motor and sensory findings of spinal cord pathology include muscle weakness, spasticity, hyper- or hyporeflexia, and a discrete level below which sensation is absent or reduced.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Patients who have Guillain-Barré syndrome (a disease of the myelin sheaths of the peripheral nerves) often present with complaints of numbness or paresthesias in the extremities.² The condition is characterized by progressive symmetric muscle weakness accompanied by absent or depressed deep tendon reflexes and is typically associated with a recent exposure to an infectious agent such as a viral upper respiratory infection, bacterial infection, or vaccine.

Myasthenia Gravis. Myasthenia gravis is a disease of the neuromuscular junction. It presents with weakness in any muscle group, and the muscles are easily fatigued by repetitive use.

Toxic Exposures. Toxins, such as botulinum, ixovotoxin, nicotine, succinylcholine, and tetrodotoxin, are prominent, though less common, causes of muscular weakness or paralysis. Botulinum toxin acts at the neuromuscular junction. Patients with botulism typically present with a gastrointestinal prodrome of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea followed by cranial nerve dysfunction and descending muscle weakness.³

Tetrodotoxin, nicotine, and curare-like paralytics act at the motor end plate of the neuromuscular junction to produce neuromuscular blockade with subsequent muscular weakness or paralysis. Similarly, ixovotoxin, the toxin responsible for tick paralysis, causes ascending flaccid paralysis by decreasing the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction.³

Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders. Conditions such as hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and periodic paralysis can also present with neurological complaints such as generalized weakness and paresthesias. Of note, it is important to differentiate true neuromuscular weakness from weakness secondary to limited effort.

Case Continuation

Because of the patient’s history of an MVC, cervical cord compression was considered concerning enough to require exclusion through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. However, upon arrival at the MRI suite, the patient became severely tachypneic and tachycardic, and was unable to tolerate lying flat. He was intubated for impending respiratory failure. Laboratory results from blood drawn prior to transport to MRI were reported immediately after the resuscitation and were notable for the following: potassium, <1.5 mEq/L; bicarbonate, 20 mEq/L; creatine kinase, 889 U/L; ethanol, not detected.

What is hypokalemic periodic paralysis?

Hypokalemic periodic paralysis (HypoKPP) is a syndrome of episodic muscle weakness with concomitant hypokalemia. Familial forms of HypoKPP have been attributed to mutations in genes coding for either calcium or sodium channels.

The nonfamilial form of HypoKPP is attributed to hyperthyroidism and is most often seen in Asian men in the second and third decades of life. The disorder is characterized by acute onset hypokalemia and extremity paralysis with simultaneous hyperthyroid state. It is believed that hypokalemia occurs as a result of intracellular shift of potassium from thyroid-induced hormone sensitization of the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase rather than a depletion of total body potassium. Acute episodes of paralysis are triggered by high-carbohydrate meals, alcohol consumption, emotional stress, and infection. Paralysis can last from 3 to 96 hours and is accompanied by decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes with normal sensation and mental status.

In the nonfamilial form of HypoKPP, signs of thyrotoxicosis are often present and include tachycardia, moist skin, and hyperthermia, but it may be difficult to specifically recognize this etiology given the patient’s grave clinical condition.⁴ Similar to many significant metabolic and electrolyte disturbances, complications of HypoKPP include dysrhythmia, respiratory failure, and sometimes death.⁵

How should HypoKPP be managed in the ED?

Management of HypoKPP begins with careful assessment of the patient’s airway, breathing, and circulation. Once the patient is stabilized, management of consequential effects of hypokalemia, such as respiratory distress and muscular paralysis, should focus on correcting the electrolyte and endocrine derangements.

Propranolol. If the patient exhibits signs of thyrotoxicosis, initial treatment includes propranolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, which both prevents the intracellular shift of potassium and assists in correcting the underlying hyperthyroid and hypermetabolic state. Although there is no standard propranolol dosing protocol for HypoKPP, some authors suggest that an aggressive dose of 2 mg intravenously (IV) every 10 minutes can shorten the patient’s episode of paralysis to 6 hours.⁶

Potassium Chloride. Administration of potassium chloride to raise the serum potassium to life-sustaining concentrations should be done cautiously through IV infusion of standard doses.⁷ In correcting hypokalemia with potassium, care should be taken to avoid overcorrection, which may subsequently result in rebound hyperkalemia as the total body potassium redistributes. Lower doses of potassium (ie, <50 mEq per dose), are preferred to achieve adequate repletion while avoiding rebound hyperkalemia.⁸

Case Conclusion

The results of thyroid studies that had been added on to the original set of laboratory studies revealed profound hyperthyroidism, with an essentially absent concentration of thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Case

An Asian man in his third decade, with a medical history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and who had recently been involved in a motor vehicle collision (MVC), presented to the ED with a chief complaint of severe bilateral upper and lower extremity weakness. The patient noted that the weakness had begun the previous evening and became progressively worse throughout the night, to the point that he was unable to move any of his extremities on the morning of presentation.

Upon arrival at the ED, the patient was awake, alert, and oriented to self, time, and place; he also spoke in full sentences without distress. He denied fever, chills, difficulty breathing, or preceding viral illness. The patient stated that he was not taking any medications and denied a history of alcohol, tobacco, or drug abuse.

Initial vital signs at presentation were: blood pressure, 141/50 mm Hg; heart rate, 90 beats/min; respiratory rate, 16 breaths/min; and temperature, 97.4°F. Oxygen saturation was 100% on room air. On physical examination, the patient was in no acute distress and had a normal mental status. His pupils were normally reactive and his other cranial nerves were normal. Muscle strength in the upper and lower extremities was 1/5 with 1+ reflexes bilaterally, and there was no sensory deficit. The patient was placed on continuous cardiac monitoring with pulse oximetry.

What is the differential diagnosis for acute extremity weakness or paralysis?

The differential diagnosis for acute symmetrical extremity weakness or paralysis is broad and includes conditions of neurological, inflammatory, and toxic/metabolic etiologies.¹ Neurological diagnoses to consider include acute stroke, specifically of the anterior cerebral or middle cerebral artery territories; Guillain-Barré syndrome; myasthenia gravis; spinal cord compression; and tick paralysis. Acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke most frequently presents with unilateral upper or lower extremity weakness accompanied by garbled speech and sensory deficits. Patients who have suffered a brainstem or cerebellar stroke commonly present with alterations of consciousness, visual changes, and ataxia. Posterior circulation strokes are also characterized by crossed neurological deficits, such as motor deficits on one side of the body and sensory deficits on the other.

Spinal Cord Pathology. Signs and symptoms of spinal cord compression or inflammation vary widely depending on the level affected. Motor and sensory findings of spinal cord pathology include muscle weakness, spasticity, hyper- or hyporeflexia, and a discrete level below which sensation is absent or reduced.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Patients who have Guillain-Barré syndrome (a disease of the myelin sheaths of the peripheral nerves) often present with complaints of numbness or paresthesias in the extremities.² The condition is characterized by progressive symmetric muscle weakness accompanied by absent or depressed deep tendon reflexes and is typically associated with a recent exposure to an infectious agent such as a viral upper respiratory infection, bacterial infection, or vaccine.

Myasthenia Gravis. Myasthenia gravis is a disease of the neuromuscular junction. It presents with weakness in any muscle group, and the muscles are easily fatigued by repetitive use.

Toxic Exposures. Toxins, such as botulinum, ixovotoxin, nicotine, succinylcholine, and tetrodotoxin, are prominent, though less common, causes of muscular weakness or paralysis. Botulinum toxin acts at the neuromuscular junction. Patients with botulism typically present with a gastrointestinal prodrome of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea followed by cranial nerve dysfunction and descending muscle weakness.³

Tetrodotoxin, nicotine, and curare-like paralytics act at the motor end plate of the neuromuscular junction to produce neuromuscular blockade with subsequent muscular weakness or paralysis. Similarly, ixovotoxin, the toxin responsible for tick paralysis, causes ascending flaccid paralysis by decreasing the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction.³

Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders. Conditions such as hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and periodic paralysis can also present with neurological complaints such as generalized weakness and paresthesias. Of note, it is important to differentiate true neuromuscular weakness from weakness secondary to limited effort.

Case Continuation

Because of the patient’s history of an MVC, cervical cord compression was considered concerning enough to require exclusion through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. However, upon arrival at the MRI suite, the patient became severely tachypneic and tachycardic, and was unable to tolerate lying flat. He was intubated for impending respiratory failure. Laboratory results from blood drawn prior to transport to MRI were reported immediately after the resuscitation and were notable for the following: potassium, <1.5 mEq/L; bicarbonate, 20 mEq/L; creatine kinase, 889 U/L; ethanol, not detected.

What is hypokalemic periodic paralysis?

Hypokalemic periodic paralysis (HypoKPP) is a syndrome of episodic muscle weakness with concomitant hypokalemia. Familial forms of HypoKPP have been attributed to mutations in genes coding for either calcium or sodium channels.

The nonfamilial form of HypoKPP is attributed to hyperthyroidism and is most often seen in Asian men in the second and third decades of life. The disorder is characterized by acute onset hypokalemia and extremity paralysis with simultaneous hyperthyroid state. It is believed that hypokalemia occurs as a result of intracellular shift of potassium from thyroid-induced hormone sensitization of the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase rather than a depletion of total body potassium. Acute episodes of paralysis are triggered by high-carbohydrate meals, alcohol consumption, emotional stress, and infection. Paralysis can last from 3 to 96 hours and is accompanied by decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes with normal sensation and mental status.

In the nonfamilial form of HypoKPP, signs of thyrotoxicosis are often present and include tachycardia, moist skin, and hyperthermia, but it may be difficult to specifically recognize this etiology given the patient’s grave clinical condition.⁴ Similar to many significant metabolic and electrolyte disturbances, complications of HypoKPP include dysrhythmia, respiratory failure, and sometimes death.⁵

How should HypoKPP be managed in the ED?

Management of HypoKPP begins with careful assessment of the patient’s airway, breathing, and circulation. Once the patient is stabilized, management of consequential effects of hypokalemia, such as respiratory distress and muscular paralysis, should focus on correcting the electrolyte and endocrine derangements.

Propranolol. If the patient exhibits signs of thyrotoxicosis, initial treatment includes propranolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, which both prevents the intracellular shift of potassium and assists in correcting the underlying hyperthyroid and hypermetabolic state. Although there is no standard propranolol dosing protocol for HypoKPP, some authors suggest that an aggressive dose of 2 mg intravenously (IV) every 10 minutes can shorten the patient’s episode of paralysis to 6 hours.⁶

Potassium Chloride. Administration of potassium chloride to raise the serum potassium to life-sustaining concentrations should be done cautiously through IV infusion of standard doses.⁷ In correcting hypokalemia with potassium, care should be taken to avoid overcorrection, which may subsequently result in rebound hyperkalemia as the total body potassium redistributes. Lower doses of potassium (ie, <50 mEq per dose), are preferred to achieve adequate repletion while avoiding rebound hyperkalemia.⁸

Case Conclusion

The results of thyroid studies that had been added on to the original set of laboratory studies revealed profound hyperthyroidism, with an essentially absent concentration of thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Case

An Asian man in his third decade, with a medical history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and who had recently been involved in a motor vehicle collision (MVC), presented to the ED with a chief complaint of severe bilateral upper and lower extremity weakness. The patient noted that the weakness had begun the previous evening and became progressively worse throughout the night, to the point that he was unable to move any of his extremities on the morning of presentation.

Upon arrival at the ED, the patient was awake, alert, and oriented to self, time, and place; he also spoke in full sentences without distress. He denied fever, chills, difficulty breathing, or preceding viral illness. The patient stated that he was not taking any medications and denied a history of alcohol, tobacco, or drug abuse.

Initial vital signs at presentation were: blood pressure, 141/50 mm Hg; heart rate, 90 beats/min; respiratory rate, 16 breaths/min; and temperature, 97.4°F. Oxygen saturation was 100% on room air. On physical examination, the patient was in no acute distress and had a normal mental status. His pupils were normally reactive and his other cranial nerves were normal. Muscle strength in the upper and lower extremities was 1/5 with 1+ reflexes bilaterally, and there was no sensory deficit. The patient was placed on continuous cardiac monitoring with pulse oximetry.

What is the differential diagnosis for acute extremity weakness or paralysis?

The differential diagnosis for acute symmetrical extremity weakness or paralysis is broad and includes conditions of neurological, inflammatory, and toxic/metabolic etiologies.¹ Neurological diagnoses to consider include acute stroke, specifically of the anterior cerebral or middle cerebral artery territories; Guillain-Barré syndrome; myasthenia gravis; spinal cord compression; and tick paralysis. Acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke most frequently presents with unilateral upper or lower extremity weakness accompanied by garbled speech and sensory deficits. Patients who have suffered a brainstem or cerebellar stroke commonly present with alterations of consciousness, visual changes, and ataxia. Posterior circulation strokes are also characterized by crossed neurological deficits, such as motor deficits on one side of the body and sensory deficits on the other.

Spinal Cord Pathology. Signs and symptoms of spinal cord compression or inflammation vary widely depending on the level affected. Motor and sensory findings of spinal cord pathology include muscle weakness, spasticity, hyper- or hyporeflexia, and a discrete level below which sensation is absent or reduced.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome. Patients who have Guillain-Barré syndrome (a disease of the myelin sheaths of the peripheral nerves) often present with complaints of numbness or paresthesias in the extremities.² The condition is characterized by progressive symmetric muscle weakness accompanied by absent or depressed deep tendon reflexes and is typically associated with a recent exposure to an infectious agent such as a viral upper respiratory infection, bacterial infection, or vaccine.

Myasthenia Gravis. Myasthenia gravis is a disease of the neuromuscular junction. It presents with weakness in any muscle group, and the muscles are easily fatigued by repetitive use.

Toxic Exposures. Toxins, such as botulinum, ixovotoxin, nicotine, succinylcholine, and tetrodotoxin, are prominent, though less common, causes of muscular weakness or paralysis. Botulinum toxin acts at the neuromuscular junction. Patients with botulism typically present with a gastrointestinal prodrome of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea followed by cranial nerve dysfunction and descending muscle weakness.³

Tetrodotoxin, nicotine, and curare-like paralytics act at the motor end plate of the neuromuscular junction to produce neuromuscular blockade with subsequent muscular weakness or paralysis. Similarly, ixovotoxin, the toxin responsible for tick paralysis, causes ascending flaccid paralysis by decreasing the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction.³

Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders. Conditions such as hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, and periodic paralysis can also present with neurological complaints such as generalized weakness and paresthesias. Of note, it is important to differentiate true neuromuscular weakness from weakness secondary to limited effort.

Case Continuation

Because of the patient’s history of an MVC, cervical cord compression was considered concerning enough to require exclusion through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine. However, upon arrival at the MRI suite, the patient became severely tachypneic and tachycardic, and was unable to tolerate lying flat. He was intubated for impending respiratory failure. Laboratory results from blood drawn prior to transport to MRI were reported immediately after the resuscitation and were notable for the following: potassium, <1.5 mEq/L; bicarbonate, 20 mEq/L; creatine kinase, 889 U/L; ethanol, not detected.

What is hypokalemic periodic paralysis?

Hypokalemic periodic paralysis (HypoKPP) is a syndrome of episodic muscle weakness with concomitant hypokalemia. Familial forms of HypoKPP have been attributed to mutations in genes coding for either calcium or sodium channels.

The nonfamilial form of HypoKPP is attributed to hyperthyroidism and is most often seen in Asian men in the second and third decades of life. The disorder is characterized by acute onset hypokalemia and extremity paralysis with simultaneous hyperthyroid state. It is believed that hypokalemia occurs as a result of intracellular shift of potassium from thyroid-induced hormone sensitization of the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase rather than a depletion of total body potassium. Acute episodes of paralysis are triggered by high-carbohydrate meals, alcohol consumption, emotional stress, and infection. Paralysis can last from 3 to 96 hours and is accompanied by decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes with normal sensation and mental status.

In the nonfamilial form of HypoKPP, signs of thyrotoxicosis are often present and include tachycardia, moist skin, and hyperthermia, but it may be difficult to specifically recognize this etiology given the patient’s grave clinical condition.⁴ Similar to many significant metabolic and electrolyte disturbances, complications of HypoKPP include dysrhythmia, respiratory failure, and sometimes death.⁵

How should HypoKPP be managed in the ED?

Management of HypoKPP begins with careful assessment of the patient’s airway, breathing, and circulation. Once the patient is stabilized, management of consequential effects of hypokalemia, such as respiratory distress and muscular paralysis, should focus on correcting the electrolyte and endocrine derangements.

Propranolol. If the patient exhibits signs of thyrotoxicosis, initial treatment includes propranolol, a nonselective beta-blocker, which both prevents the intracellular shift of potassium and assists in correcting the underlying hyperthyroid and hypermetabolic state. Although there is no standard propranolol dosing protocol for HypoKPP, some authors suggest that an aggressive dose of 2 mg intravenously (IV) every 10 minutes can shorten the patient’s episode of paralysis to 6 hours.⁶

Potassium Chloride. Administration of potassium chloride to raise the serum potassium to life-sustaining concentrations should be done cautiously through IV infusion of standard doses.⁷ In correcting hypokalemia with potassium, care should be taken to avoid overcorrection, which may subsequently result in rebound hyperkalemia as the total body potassium redistributes. Lower doses of potassium (ie, <50 mEq per dose), are preferred to achieve adequate repletion while avoiding rebound hyperkalemia.⁸

Case Conclusion

The results of thyroid studies that had been added on to the original set of laboratory studies revealed profound hyperthyroidism, with an essentially absent concentration of thyroid-stimulating hormone.

WASHINGTON – If patients have sleep disordered breathing with obstructive sleep apnea, will its treatment have cardiovascular disease benefits, especially in terms of the incidence or severity of atrial fibrillation?

Observational evidence suggests that apnea interventions may help these patients, but no clear case yet exists to prove that a breathing intervention works, experts say, and, as a result, U.S. practice is mixed when it comes to using treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), specifically continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), to prevent or treat atrial fibrillation.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

This article was updated on 7/10/17.

WASHINGTON – If patients have sleep disordered breathing with obstructive sleep apnea, will its treatment have cardiovascular disease benefits, especially in terms of the incidence or severity of atrial fibrillation?

Observational evidence suggests that apnea interventions may help these patients, but no clear case yet exists to prove that a breathing intervention works, experts say, and, as a result, U.S. practice is mixed when it comes to using treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), specifically continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), to prevent or treat atrial fibrillation.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

This article was updated on 7/10/17.

WASHINGTON – If patients have sleep disordered breathing with obstructive sleep apnea, will its treatment have cardiovascular disease benefits, especially in terms of the incidence or severity of atrial fibrillation?

Observational evidence suggests that apnea interventions may help these patients, but no clear case yet exists to prove that a breathing intervention works, experts say, and, as a result, U.S. practice is mixed when it comes to using treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), specifically continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), to prevent or treat atrial fibrillation.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

This article was updated on 7/10/17.

A 46-year-old man with a remote history of general tonic-clonic seizures, for which he was taking phenytoin, presented to the ED 30 minutes after sustaining a witnessed mechanical fall. The patient had fallen onto his nondominant left hand, which resulted in an injury to his elbow. He reported neither losing consciousness nor experiencing any seizures following the incident. He denied dislocating the joint or sustaining any other injuries from the fall. He also denied a history of past left elbow injury.

The patient was alert, oriented, and provided a full history of the incident. Regarding medical history, he stated that his last seizure had occurred 10 years prior. Except for the left elbow pain, a review of his systems was negative. The patient appeared in no acute distress, and supported his left upper extremity with a bandana and his right hand.

The patient’s vital signs were normal. The physical examination was negative except for the left elbow, which had significant swelling and limited range of motion without skin break, leading to suspicion for a prehospital dislocation with self-reduction. The joints above, below, and at the injury site were assessed for neurovascular injury.

Discussion

There is a paucity of information on vascular injury from elbow dislocation in the emergency medicine literature. A recent literature search referenced orthopedic pitfalls in the ED,¹ but most data appear in the orthopedic and vascular literature. A case report from the orthopedic literature in Brazil cites a vascular injury after ED relocation of a dislocated elbow following an assault.²

The elbow is the second most commonly dislocated joint (not including the patella) after the shoulder.³ Posterior dislocations make up the majority of these injuries. Simple versus complex injuries can be differentiated by the presence or absence of fracture.⁴ Simple complications include stiffness; loss of mobility, especially with full extension; neurovascular injuries; and compartment syndrome. Complex injuries involve fractures and potential neurovascular injuries, stiffness, pain, and loss of mobility.

Soft tissue injuries, fractures, and neurovascular complaints represent the majority of ED encounters, and are commonly related to falls. The elbow is the articulation of the humerus, ulna, and radius bones. Range of motion includes, but is not limited to, flexion, extension, supination, and pronation. Tears in the lateral ulnar ligament, joint capsule, and medial collateral ligament lead to instability of the joint and increase risk of dislocation.

Fractures make up to 20% of injuries to the elbow. These include fractures of the radial head and neck (most common), olecranon, and distal humerus.⁵ Open elbow fractures are rare, as are vascular injuries (5%-13% of cases).⁶ When present, vascular elbow injuries usually involve the brachial artery, and display abnormal palpable and Doppler assessment of the brachial and radial arteries.⁶

Nerve injuries may include injury to the radial nerve. Manifestations of radial nerve injury include abnormal sensation to the dorsum of the hand, trouble straightening the arm, and wrist-drop. Ulnar nerve injury typically presents with abnormal sensation to the fourth and fifth digits and decreased grip strength.

Conclusion

Vascular abnormalities are rare complications following elbow injuries. Our patient sustained a lacerated brachial artery, which was repaired via saphenous graft; brachial and basilic vein lacerations, which were ligated; and an avulsion fracture with an unstable joint, which was stabilized with external fixation and stabilization. He was discharged the following day with full neurovascular function.

A methodical approach to assessing patients presenting with elbow injury is essential to making the correct diagnosis. This should include a careful evaluation of the joints above and below the area of injury, as well as attention to the neurovascular examination, with a heightened suspicion for a vascular abnormality in complex injuries. Doppler and ultrasound evaluation with multiple rechecks can assist with the diagnosis. Our patient was rapidly assessed with a concern for a vascular injury, and was emergently referred to vascular surgery for repair of the brachial artery and stabilization of the joint.

A 46-year-old man with a remote history of general tonic-clonic seizures, for which he was taking phenytoin, presented to the ED 30 minutes after sustaining a witnessed mechanical fall. The patient had fallen onto his nondominant left hand, which resulted in an injury to his elbow. He reported neither losing consciousness nor experiencing any seizures following the incident. He denied dislocating the joint or sustaining any other injuries from the fall. He also denied a history of past left elbow injury.

The patient was alert, oriented, and provided a full history of the incident. Regarding medical history, he stated that his last seizure had occurred 10 years prior. Except for the left elbow pain, a review of his systems was negative. The patient appeared in no acute distress, and supported his left upper extremity with a bandana and his right hand.

The patient’s vital signs were normal. The physical examination was negative except for the left elbow, which had significant swelling and limited range of motion without skin break, leading to suspicion for a prehospital dislocation with self-reduction. The joints above, below, and at the injury site were assessed for neurovascular injury.

Discussion

There is a paucity of information on vascular injury from elbow dislocation in the emergency medicine literature. A recent literature search referenced orthopedic pitfalls in the ED,¹ but most data appear in the orthopedic and vascular literature. A case report from the orthopedic literature in Brazil cites a vascular injury after ED relocation of a dislocated elbow following an assault.²

The elbow is the second most commonly dislocated joint (not including the patella) after the shoulder.³ Posterior dislocations make up the majority of these injuries. Simple versus complex injuries can be differentiated by the presence or absence of fracture.⁴ Simple complications include stiffness; loss of mobility, especially with full extension; neurovascular injuries; and compartment syndrome. Complex injuries involve fractures and potential neurovascular injuries, stiffness, pain, and loss of mobility.

Soft tissue injuries, fractures, and neurovascular complaints represent the majority of ED encounters, and are commonly related to falls. The elbow is the articulation of the humerus, ulna, and radius bones. Range of motion includes, but is not limited to, flexion, extension, supination, and pronation. Tears in the lateral ulnar ligament, joint capsule, and medial collateral ligament lead to instability of the joint and increase risk of dislocation.

Fractures make up to 20% of injuries to the elbow. These include fractures of the radial head and neck (most common), olecranon, and distal humerus.⁵ Open elbow fractures are rare, as are vascular injuries (5%-13% of cases).⁶ When present, vascular elbow injuries usually involve the brachial artery, and display abnormal palpable and Doppler assessment of the brachial and radial arteries.⁶

Nerve injuries may include injury to the radial nerve. Manifestations of radial nerve injury include abnormal sensation to the dorsum of the hand, trouble straightening the arm, and wrist-drop. Ulnar nerve injury typically presents with abnormal sensation to the fourth and fifth digits and decreased grip strength.

Conclusion

Vascular abnormalities are rare complications following elbow injuries. Our patient sustained a lacerated brachial artery, which was repaired via saphenous graft; brachial and basilic vein lacerations, which were ligated; and an avulsion fracture with an unstable joint, which was stabilized with external fixation and stabilization. He was discharged the following day with full neurovascular function.

A methodical approach to assessing patients presenting with elbow injury is essential to making the correct diagnosis. This should include a careful evaluation of the joints above and below the area of injury, as well as attention to the neurovascular examination, with a heightened suspicion for a vascular abnormality in complex injuries. Doppler and ultrasound evaluation with multiple rechecks can assist with the diagnosis. Our patient was rapidly assessed with a concern for a vascular injury, and was emergently referred to vascular surgery for repair of the brachial artery and stabilization of the joint.

A 46-year-old man with a remote history of general tonic-clonic seizures, for which he was taking phenytoin, presented to the ED 30 minutes after sustaining a witnessed mechanical fall. The patient had fallen onto his nondominant left hand, which resulted in an injury to his elbow. He reported neither losing consciousness nor experiencing any seizures following the incident. He denied dislocating the joint or sustaining any other injuries from the fall. He also denied a history of past left elbow injury.

The patient was alert, oriented, and provided a full history of the incident. Regarding medical history, he stated that his last seizure had occurred 10 years prior. Except for the left elbow pain, a review of his systems was negative. The patient appeared in no acute distress, and supported his left upper extremity with a bandana and his right hand.

The patient’s vital signs were normal. The physical examination was negative except for the left elbow, which had significant swelling and limited range of motion without skin break, leading to suspicion for a prehospital dislocation with self-reduction. The joints above, below, and at the injury site were assessed for neurovascular injury.

Discussion

There is a paucity of information on vascular injury from elbow dislocation in the emergency medicine literature. A recent literature search referenced orthopedic pitfalls in the ED,¹ but most data appear in the orthopedic and vascular literature. A case report from the orthopedic literature in Brazil cites a vascular injury after ED relocation of a dislocated elbow following an assault.²

The elbow is the second most commonly dislocated joint (not including the patella) after the shoulder.³ Posterior dislocations make up the majority of these injuries. Simple versus complex injuries can be differentiated by the presence or absence of fracture.⁴ Simple complications include stiffness; loss of mobility, especially with full extension; neurovascular injuries; and compartment syndrome. Complex injuries involve fractures and potential neurovascular injuries, stiffness, pain, and loss of mobility.

Soft tissue injuries, fractures, and neurovascular complaints represent the majority of ED encounters, and are commonly related to falls. The elbow is the articulation of the humerus, ulna, and radius bones. Range of motion includes, but is not limited to, flexion, extension, supination, and pronation. Tears in the lateral ulnar ligament, joint capsule, and medial collateral ligament lead to instability of the joint and increase risk of dislocation.

Fractures make up to 20% of injuries to the elbow. These include fractures of the radial head and neck (most common), olecranon, and distal humerus.⁵ Open elbow fractures are rare, as are vascular injuries (5%-13% of cases).⁶ When present, vascular elbow injuries usually involve the brachial artery, and display abnormal palpable and Doppler assessment of the brachial and radial arteries.⁶

Nerve injuries may include injury to the radial nerve. Manifestations of radial nerve injury include abnormal sensation to the dorsum of the hand, trouble straightening the arm, and wrist-drop. Ulnar nerve injury typically presents with abnormal sensation to the fourth and fifth digits and decreased grip strength.

Conclusion

Vascular abnormalities are rare complications following elbow injuries. Our patient sustained a lacerated brachial artery, which was repaired via saphenous graft; brachial and basilic vein lacerations, which were ligated; and an avulsion fracture with an unstable joint, which was stabilized with external fixation and stabilization. He was discharged the following day with full neurovascular function.

A methodical approach to assessing patients presenting with elbow injury is essential to making the correct diagnosis. This should include a careful evaluation of the joints above and below the area of injury, as well as attention to the neurovascular examination, with a heightened suspicion for a vascular abnormality in complex injuries. Doppler and ultrasound evaluation with multiple rechecks can assist with the diagnosis. Our patient was rapidly assessed with a concern for a vascular injury, and was emergently referred to vascular surgery for repair of the brachial artery and stabilization of the joint.