User login
Single-dose RT suffices for treatment of spinal cord compression due to mets
CHICAGO – A single dose of radiation therapy appears to work as well as multiple doses given over a week for treating spinal cord compression due to metastatic cancer, according to findings of the SCORAD III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
“There is no standard radiotherapy schedule,” first author Peter Hoskin, MD, FCRP, FRCR, an oncologist at the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre in Middlesex, England, noted in a press briefing. “A range of radiation doses are used internationally, from single doses of 8 to 10 Gy ranging up to 4 weeks of treatment delivering 40 Gy.”
The noninferiority phase III trial enrolled nearly 700 patients in the United Kingdom and Australia with spinal cord compression due to metastases, the majority of whom were able to walk at baseline. They were randomized evenly to receive either 8 Gy of radiation in a single fraction or 20 Gy split into five fractions given over consecutive days.
Results showed that at 8 weeks, more than two-thirds of patients in each group were able to walk, the trial’s primary endpoint. The lower bound of the confidence interval for the difference between groups fell just outside the trial’s margin for noninferiority.
Additionally, the two groups were statistically indistinguishable with respect to median overall survival, bowel and bladder function, and the rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity.
“A single dose of 8 Gy is as effective as 20 Gy in five fractions for a range of clinically relevant endpoints, particularly ambulatory status, both at 8 weeks and indeed at all time points between 1 week and 12 weeks,” Dr. Hoskin summarized. The trial also underscores the importance of early diagnosis, as the majority of patients who were ambulatory initially remained so with radiation therapy, regardless of dosing schedule.
“A single dose of radiotherapy in our minds is now recommended in this setting. It has major advantages for these patients,” he maintained. “An important thing to realize is that these patients had a very short survival; median survival in this study was only 13 weeks. A single dose has enormous advantages in those patients with short survival times, and of course, it is increasingly cost effective.”
Findings in context
The trial population was not fully representative of all patients with spinal cord compression due to metastases, with underrepresentation of some cancers, such as breast cancer, and the modest survival, Dr. Hoskin acknowledged.
Some patients on the trial have survived for many months and even years, he noted. “We have looked at patients at longer times, although it was not in the protocol, and there was no obvious difference [in outcomes]. But there is some evidence to suggest that for the longer-surviving patients, a more prolonged fractionation may be appropriate, although clearly that needs to be investigated properly in a formal randomized trial.”
“This is the first study that really shows equal outcomes in terms of meaningful benefits for patients with a single dose of radiotherapy versus a much longer course, allowing patients to spend more time with their families, more time doing the things they want to do,” commented ASCO Expert Joshua A. Jones, MD, MA, of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
“We still have work to do to figure out for patients who have longer than this average survival of 3 months what is the most appropriate regimen,” he agreed. “But for many patients, this is going to provide tremendous benefit with the idea that sometimes, less really is more.”
Study details
SCORAD III, which was funded by Cancer Research UK, enrolled 688 patients with metastatic prostate (44%), lung (18%), breast (11%), and gastrointestinal (11%) cancers.
At baseline, 66% were able to walk without or with an aid (ambulatory status 1 or 2), whereas the rest were unable to walk but still had some limb power (ambulatory status 3) or had flaccid paraplegia (ambulatory status 4).
At 8 weeks, the proportion of patients with ambulatory status 1 or 2 was 69.5% in the group who received the 8-Gy single-dose radiation therapy and 73.3% in the group who received the 20-Gy multidose radiation therapy, for a risk difference of –3.78%, reported Dr. Hoskin.
The 90% confidence interval for the difference between groups of –11.85% to 4.28% slightly exceeded the trial’s predefined 11% margin for noninferiority.
Among patients having ambulatory status 1 or 2 at baseline, the proportion maintaining that status at 8 weeks was 62.20% with the single dose and 63.07% with multiple doses. Median overall survival was 12.4 weeks and 13.7 weeks, respectively, a nonsignificant difference.
Patients in the single-dose and multidose groups had similar rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (20.6% vs. 20.4%), but the former had a lower rate of grade 1 or 2 toxicity (51.0% vs. 56.9%).
CHICAGO – A single dose of radiation therapy appears to work as well as multiple doses given over a week for treating spinal cord compression due to metastatic cancer, according to findings of the SCORAD III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
“There is no standard radiotherapy schedule,” first author Peter Hoskin, MD, FCRP, FRCR, an oncologist at the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre in Middlesex, England, noted in a press briefing. “A range of radiation doses are used internationally, from single doses of 8 to 10 Gy ranging up to 4 weeks of treatment delivering 40 Gy.”
The noninferiority phase III trial enrolled nearly 700 patients in the United Kingdom and Australia with spinal cord compression due to metastases, the majority of whom were able to walk at baseline. They were randomized evenly to receive either 8 Gy of radiation in a single fraction or 20 Gy split into five fractions given over consecutive days.
Results showed that at 8 weeks, more than two-thirds of patients in each group were able to walk, the trial’s primary endpoint. The lower bound of the confidence interval for the difference between groups fell just outside the trial’s margin for noninferiority.
Additionally, the two groups were statistically indistinguishable with respect to median overall survival, bowel and bladder function, and the rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity.
“A single dose of 8 Gy is as effective as 20 Gy in five fractions for a range of clinically relevant endpoints, particularly ambulatory status, both at 8 weeks and indeed at all time points between 1 week and 12 weeks,” Dr. Hoskin summarized. The trial also underscores the importance of early diagnosis, as the majority of patients who were ambulatory initially remained so with radiation therapy, regardless of dosing schedule.
“A single dose of radiotherapy in our minds is now recommended in this setting. It has major advantages for these patients,” he maintained. “An important thing to realize is that these patients had a very short survival; median survival in this study was only 13 weeks. A single dose has enormous advantages in those patients with short survival times, and of course, it is increasingly cost effective.”
Findings in context
The trial population was not fully representative of all patients with spinal cord compression due to metastases, with underrepresentation of some cancers, such as breast cancer, and the modest survival, Dr. Hoskin acknowledged.
Some patients on the trial have survived for many months and even years, he noted. “We have looked at patients at longer times, although it was not in the protocol, and there was no obvious difference [in outcomes]. But there is some evidence to suggest that for the longer-surviving patients, a more prolonged fractionation may be appropriate, although clearly that needs to be investigated properly in a formal randomized trial.”
“This is the first study that really shows equal outcomes in terms of meaningful benefits for patients with a single dose of radiotherapy versus a much longer course, allowing patients to spend more time with their families, more time doing the things they want to do,” commented ASCO Expert Joshua A. Jones, MD, MA, of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
“We still have work to do to figure out for patients who have longer than this average survival of 3 months what is the most appropriate regimen,” he agreed. “But for many patients, this is going to provide tremendous benefit with the idea that sometimes, less really is more.”
Study details
SCORAD III, which was funded by Cancer Research UK, enrolled 688 patients with metastatic prostate (44%), lung (18%), breast (11%), and gastrointestinal (11%) cancers.
At baseline, 66% were able to walk without or with an aid (ambulatory status 1 or 2), whereas the rest were unable to walk but still had some limb power (ambulatory status 3) or had flaccid paraplegia (ambulatory status 4).
At 8 weeks, the proportion of patients with ambulatory status 1 or 2 was 69.5% in the group who received the 8-Gy single-dose radiation therapy and 73.3% in the group who received the 20-Gy multidose radiation therapy, for a risk difference of –3.78%, reported Dr. Hoskin.
The 90% confidence interval for the difference between groups of –11.85% to 4.28% slightly exceeded the trial’s predefined 11% margin for noninferiority.
Among patients having ambulatory status 1 or 2 at baseline, the proportion maintaining that status at 8 weeks was 62.20% with the single dose and 63.07% with multiple doses. Median overall survival was 12.4 weeks and 13.7 weeks, respectively, a nonsignificant difference.
Patients in the single-dose and multidose groups had similar rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (20.6% vs. 20.4%), but the former had a lower rate of grade 1 or 2 toxicity (51.0% vs. 56.9%).
CHICAGO – A single dose of radiation therapy appears to work as well as multiple doses given over a week for treating spinal cord compression due to metastatic cancer, according to findings of the SCORAD III trial reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
“There is no standard radiotherapy schedule,” first author Peter Hoskin, MD, FCRP, FRCR, an oncologist at the Mount Vernon Cancer Centre in Middlesex, England, noted in a press briefing. “A range of radiation doses are used internationally, from single doses of 8 to 10 Gy ranging up to 4 weeks of treatment delivering 40 Gy.”
The noninferiority phase III trial enrolled nearly 700 patients in the United Kingdom and Australia with spinal cord compression due to metastases, the majority of whom were able to walk at baseline. They were randomized evenly to receive either 8 Gy of radiation in a single fraction or 20 Gy split into five fractions given over consecutive days.
Results showed that at 8 weeks, more than two-thirds of patients in each group were able to walk, the trial’s primary endpoint. The lower bound of the confidence interval for the difference between groups fell just outside the trial’s margin for noninferiority.
Additionally, the two groups were statistically indistinguishable with respect to median overall survival, bowel and bladder function, and the rate of grade 3 or 4 toxicity.
“A single dose of 8 Gy is as effective as 20 Gy in five fractions for a range of clinically relevant endpoints, particularly ambulatory status, both at 8 weeks and indeed at all time points between 1 week and 12 weeks,” Dr. Hoskin summarized. The trial also underscores the importance of early diagnosis, as the majority of patients who were ambulatory initially remained so with radiation therapy, regardless of dosing schedule.
“A single dose of radiotherapy in our minds is now recommended in this setting. It has major advantages for these patients,” he maintained. “An important thing to realize is that these patients had a very short survival; median survival in this study was only 13 weeks. A single dose has enormous advantages in those patients with short survival times, and of course, it is increasingly cost effective.”
Findings in context
The trial population was not fully representative of all patients with spinal cord compression due to metastases, with underrepresentation of some cancers, such as breast cancer, and the modest survival, Dr. Hoskin acknowledged.
Some patients on the trial have survived for many months and even years, he noted. “We have looked at patients at longer times, although it was not in the protocol, and there was no obvious difference [in outcomes]. But there is some evidence to suggest that for the longer-surviving patients, a more prolonged fractionation may be appropriate, although clearly that needs to be investigated properly in a formal randomized trial.”
“This is the first study that really shows equal outcomes in terms of meaningful benefits for patients with a single dose of radiotherapy versus a much longer course, allowing patients to spend more time with their families, more time doing the things they want to do,” commented ASCO Expert Joshua A. Jones, MD, MA, of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.
“We still have work to do to figure out for patients who have longer than this average survival of 3 months what is the most appropriate regimen,” he agreed. “But for many patients, this is going to provide tremendous benefit with the idea that sometimes, less really is more.”
Study details
SCORAD III, which was funded by Cancer Research UK, enrolled 688 patients with metastatic prostate (44%), lung (18%), breast (11%), and gastrointestinal (11%) cancers.
At baseline, 66% were able to walk without or with an aid (ambulatory status 1 or 2), whereas the rest were unable to walk but still had some limb power (ambulatory status 3) or had flaccid paraplegia (ambulatory status 4).
At 8 weeks, the proportion of patients with ambulatory status 1 or 2 was 69.5% in the group who received the 8-Gy single-dose radiation therapy and 73.3% in the group who received the 20-Gy multidose radiation therapy, for a risk difference of –3.78%, reported Dr. Hoskin.
The 90% confidence interval for the difference between groups of –11.85% to 4.28% slightly exceeded the trial’s predefined 11% margin for noninferiority.
Among patients having ambulatory status 1 or 2 at baseline, the proportion maintaining that status at 8 weeks was 62.20% with the single dose and 63.07% with multiple doses. Median overall survival was 12.4 weeks and 13.7 weeks, respectively, a nonsignificant difference.
Patients in the single-dose and multidose groups had similar rates of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (20.6% vs. 20.4%), but the former had a lower rate of grade 1 or 2 toxicity (51.0% vs. 56.9%).
At ASCO 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: At 8 weeks, the proportion of patients able to walk was 69.5% with 8 Gy given in a single dose and 73.3% with 20 Gy given in five doses.
Data source: A randomized phase III noninferiority trial among 688 patients with spinal cord compression due to metastatic cancer (SCORAD III trial).
Disclosures: Dr. Hoskin disclosed that he receives research funding (institutional) from Varian Medical Systems. The trial was funded by Cancer Research UK.
U.S. malaria cases dipped slightly in 2014
The number of confirmed malaria cases reported in the United States in 2014 is the fourth highest annual total since 1973, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but the 2014 number of 1,724 cases is down slightly from 1,741 – the previous year’s number of confirmed cases.
The CDC monitors malaria cases in part to identify any instances of local, rather than imported, transmission. For 2014, no cases of local transmission were reported.
Of the imported transmission cases for which the region of acquisition was known, 1,383 (82.1%) came from Africa and 160 (9.5%) from Asia, making up all but 62 of the imported cases. The four leading countries of origin in Africa were Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, and Liberia (346, 153, 133, and 125 cases, respectively). Most of the cases from Asia came from India, which accounted for 100 of the 160 cases.
Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea were the countries primarily affected by the Ebola virus disease outbreak in 2014 and into 2015. The study authors, Kimberly E. Mace, PhD, and Paul M. Arguin, MD, noted in the May 26 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report that “Ebola negatively impacted the delivery of malaria care and prevention services in the Ebola-affected countries, which could have increased malaria morbidity and mortality” (MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66[12]:1-24).
“Despite progress in reducing global prevalence of malaria, the disease remains endemic in many regions and use of appropriate prevention measures by travelers is still inadequate,” they added.
Among all cases, 17% were classified as severe illness, including five deaths (a decrease from 10 deaths in 2013). All five patients who died reported not taking chemoprophylaxis during their travel. More than half (57.5%) of the patients reported that the purpose of their travel was to visit friends and relatives.
“Health care providers should talk to their patients, especially those who would travel to countries where malaria is endemic to visit friends and relatives, about upcoming travel plans and offer education and medicines to prevent malaria,” the authors wrote.
The number of confirmed malaria cases reported in the United States in 2014 is the fourth highest annual total since 1973, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but the 2014 number of 1,724 cases is down slightly from 1,741 – the previous year’s number of confirmed cases.
The CDC monitors malaria cases in part to identify any instances of local, rather than imported, transmission. For 2014, no cases of local transmission were reported.
Of the imported transmission cases for which the region of acquisition was known, 1,383 (82.1%) came from Africa and 160 (9.5%) from Asia, making up all but 62 of the imported cases. The four leading countries of origin in Africa were Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, and Liberia (346, 153, 133, and 125 cases, respectively). Most of the cases from Asia came from India, which accounted for 100 of the 160 cases.
Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea were the countries primarily affected by the Ebola virus disease outbreak in 2014 and into 2015. The study authors, Kimberly E. Mace, PhD, and Paul M. Arguin, MD, noted in the May 26 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report that “Ebola negatively impacted the delivery of malaria care and prevention services in the Ebola-affected countries, which could have increased malaria morbidity and mortality” (MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66[12]:1-24).
“Despite progress in reducing global prevalence of malaria, the disease remains endemic in many regions and use of appropriate prevention measures by travelers is still inadequate,” they added.
Among all cases, 17% were classified as severe illness, including five deaths (a decrease from 10 deaths in 2013). All five patients who died reported not taking chemoprophylaxis during their travel. More than half (57.5%) of the patients reported that the purpose of their travel was to visit friends and relatives.
“Health care providers should talk to their patients, especially those who would travel to countries where malaria is endemic to visit friends and relatives, about upcoming travel plans and offer education and medicines to prevent malaria,” the authors wrote.
The number of confirmed malaria cases reported in the United States in 2014 is the fourth highest annual total since 1973, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but the 2014 number of 1,724 cases is down slightly from 1,741 – the previous year’s number of confirmed cases.
The CDC monitors malaria cases in part to identify any instances of local, rather than imported, transmission. For 2014, no cases of local transmission were reported.
Of the imported transmission cases for which the region of acquisition was known, 1,383 (82.1%) came from Africa and 160 (9.5%) from Asia, making up all but 62 of the imported cases. The four leading countries of origin in Africa were Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, and Liberia (346, 153, 133, and 125 cases, respectively). Most of the cases from Asia came from India, which accounted for 100 of the 160 cases.
Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea were the countries primarily affected by the Ebola virus disease outbreak in 2014 and into 2015. The study authors, Kimberly E. Mace, PhD, and Paul M. Arguin, MD, noted in the May 26 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report that “Ebola negatively impacted the delivery of malaria care and prevention services in the Ebola-affected countries, which could have increased malaria morbidity and mortality” (MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66[12]:1-24).
“Despite progress in reducing global prevalence of malaria, the disease remains endemic in many regions and use of appropriate prevention measures by travelers is still inadequate,” they added.
Among all cases, 17% were classified as severe illness, including five deaths (a decrease from 10 deaths in 2013). All five patients who died reported not taking chemoprophylaxis during their travel. More than half (57.5%) of the patients reported that the purpose of their travel was to visit friends and relatives.
“Health care providers should talk to their patients, especially those who would travel to countries where malaria is endemic to visit friends and relatives, about upcoming travel plans and offer education and medicines to prevent malaria,” the authors wrote.
FROM MMWR
Study offers snapshot of common MS comorbidities
NEW ORLEANS – Comorbidities such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, gastrointestinal disorders, and depression are significantly more common among patients with multiple sclerosis, compared with patients who do not have the condition.
The findings, based on a large analysis of national claims data that was presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, may better inform physicians and patients about potential comorbidities in patients with MS, lead study author Kiren Kresa-Reahl, MD, said in an interview. “The challenge is, what is the underlying problem?” she asked. “Is it the chicken or the egg? It may be that MS lesions on the brain and microvascular disease look similar, so it’s hard to know. There are also conditions that are caused by MS, such as depression. Is it caused by MS the disease or is it a comorbidity with MS? That’s hard to know.”
In an effort to compare the prevalence of comorbidities in patients with and without MS, Dr. Kresa-Reahl and her associates retrospectively evaluated IMS Health Real World Data Adjudicated Claims-U.S. data between Jan. 1, 2011, and Sept. 30, 2015. The database includes about 150 million patients with a medical benefit and a subset of 95 million patients with both medical and pharmacy benefits. MS patients were required to have at least two claims with an ICD-9 diagnosis of MS 30 days apart and to be between the ages of 18 and 65.
The researchers drew from a systematic review of the 10 most common comorbidities in MS (Mult Scler. 2015;21[3]:263-81) and then matched 69,550 MS patients to a pool of 3,129,573 patients without MS by age group, gender, geographic region, and index quarter year. This left 66,616 patients in each cohort. Their mean age was 46 years, 76% were female, and the majority had commercial health insurance (97% of MS patients and 95% of those without the condition).
Of the 10 common comorbidities, eight occurred significantly more frequently among MS patients, compared with those without the condition (P less than .0001 for all). These included hyperlipidemia (27.76% vs. 24.57%, respectively), hypertension (26.91% vs. 23.50%), GI disorders (18.02% vs. 13.84%), depression (16.12% vs. 9.62%), thyroid disease (15.77% vs. 12.05%), anxiety (12.27% vs. 9.32%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10.39% vs. 9.52%).
Dr. Kresa-Reahl, a neurologist at the Providence Multiple Sclerosis Center in Portland, Ore., and her associates also found that patients with MS had a significantly lower prevalence of alcohol abuse, AIDS, mild liver disease, and moderate liver disease than did patients without MS (P less than .05 for all). There were no differences between groups in the prevalence of diabetes without complications or in metastatic tumor (P greater than .05).
She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for missing information and the inability of the researchers to determine which form of MS the patients had. “It might be that if we looked at just Medicare and Medicaid patients, these diagnoses would be a little bit different,” Dr. Kresa-Reahl added. “Maybe they would have more disability or more depression or more limited mobility. It’s hard to know, but this is a snapshot of people who have commercial insurance, so maybe they would be more likely to be employed.”
The study was sponsored by EMD Serono. Dr. Kresa-Reahl disclosed that she has received consulting fees from Biogen and EMD Serono; speakers fees and honoraria from Biogen, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, and Teva; and grant/research support from Biogen, Genentech, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis.
NEW ORLEANS – Comorbidities such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, gastrointestinal disorders, and depression are significantly more common among patients with multiple sclerosis, compared with patients who do not have the condition.
The findings, based on a large analysis of national claims data that was presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, may better inform physicians and patients about potential comorbidities in patients with MS, lead study author Kiren Kresa-Reahl, MD, said in an interview. “The challenge is, what is the underlying problem?” she asked. “Is it the chicken or the egg? It may be that MS lesions on the brain and microvascular disease look similar, so it’s hard to know. There are also conditions that are caused by MS, such as depression. Is it caused by MS the disease or is it a comorbidity with MS? That’s hard to know.”
In an effort to compare the prevalence of comorbidities in patients with and without MS, Dr. Kresa-Reahl and her associates retrospectively evaluated IMS Health Real World Data Adjudicated Claims-U.S. data between Jan. 1, 2011, and Sept. 30, 2015. The database includes about 150 million patients with a medical benefit and a subset of 95 million patients with both medical and pharmacy benefits. MS patients were required to have at least two claims with an ICD-9 diagnosis of MS 30 days apart and to be between the ages of 18 and 65.
The researchers drew from a systematic review of the 10 most common comorbidities in MS (Mult Scler. 2015;21[3]:263-81) and then matched 69,550 MS patients to a pool of 3,129,573 patients without MS by age group, gender, geographic region, and index quarter year. This left 66,616 patients in each cohort. Their mean age was 46 years, 76% were female, and the majority had commercial health insurance (97% of MS patients and 95% of those without the condition).
Of the 10 common comorbidities, eight occurred significantly more frequently among MS patients, compared with those without the condition (P less than .0001 for all). These included hyperlipidemia (27.76% vs. 24.57%, respectively), hypertension (26.91% vs. 23.50%), GI disorders (18.02% vs. 13.84%), depression (16.12% vs. 9.62%), thyroid disease (15.77% vs. 12.05%), anxiety (12.27% vs. 9.32%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10.39% vs. 9.52%).
Dr. Kresa-Reahl, a neurologist at the Providence Multiple Sclerosis Center in Portland, Ore., and her associates also found that patients with MS had a significantly lower prevalence of alcohol abuse, AIDS, mild liver disease, and moderate liver disease than did patients without MS (P less than .05 for all). There were no differences between groups in the prevalence of diabetes without complications or in metastatic tumor (P greater than .05).
She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for missing information and the inability of the researchers to determine which form of MS the patients had. “It might be that if we looked at just Medicare and Medicaid patients, these diagnoses would be a little bit different,” Dr. Kresa-Reahl added. “Maybe they would have more disability or more depression or more limited mobility. It’s hard to know, but this is a snapshot of people who have commercial insurance, so maybe they would be more likely to be employed.”
The study was sponsored by EMD Serono. Dr. Kresa-Reahl disclosed that she has received consulting fees from Biogen and EMD Serono; speakers fees and honoraria from Biogen, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, and Teva; and grant/research support from Biogen, Genentech, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis.
NEW ORLEANS – Comorbidities such as hyperlipidemia, hypertension, gastrointestinal disorders, and depression are significantly more common among patients with multiple sclerosis, compared with patients who do not have the condition.
The findings, based on a large analysis of national claims data that was presented at the annual meeting of the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, may better inform physicians and patients about potential comorbidities in patients with MS, lead study author Kiren Kresa-Reahl, MD, said in an interview. “The challenge is, what is the underlying problem?” she asked. “Is it the chicken or the egg? It may be that MS lesions on the brain and microvascular disease look similar, so it’s hard to know. There are also conditions that are caused by MS, such as depression. Is it caused by MS the disease or is it a comorbidity with MS? That’s hard to know.”
In an effort to compare the prevalence of comorbidities in patients with and without MS, Dr. Kresa-Reahl and her associates retrospectively evaluated IMS Health Real World Data Adjudicated Claims-U.S. data between Jan. 1, 2011, and Sept. 30, 2015. The database includes about 150 million patients with a medical benefit and a subset of 95 million patients with both medical and pharmacy benefits. MS patients were required to have at least two claims with an ICD-9 diagnosis of MS 30 days apart and to be between the ages of 18 and 65.
The researchers drew from a systematic review of the 10 most common comorbidities in MS (Mult Scler. 2015;21[3]:263-81) and then matched 69,550 MS patients to a pool of 3,129,573 patients without MS by age group, gender, geographic region, and index quarter year. This left 66,616 patients in each cohort. Their mean age was 46 years, 76% were female, and the majority had commercial health insurance (97% of MS patients and 95% of those without the condition).
Of the 10 common comorbidities, eight occurred significantly more frequently among MS patients, compared with those without the condition (P less than .0001 for all). These included hyperlipidemia (27.76% vs. 24.57%, respectively), hypertension (26.91% vs. 23.50%), GI disorders (18.02% vs. 13.84%), depression (16.12% vs. 9.62%), thyroid disease (15.77% vs. 12.05%), anxiety (12.27% vs. 9.32%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10.39% vs. 9.52%).
Dr. Kresa-Reahl, a neurologist at the Providence Multiple Sclerosis Center in Portland, Ore., and her associates also found that patients with MS had a significantly lower prevalence of alcohol abuse, AIDS, mild liver disease, and moderate liver disease than did patients without MS (P less than .05 for all). There were no differences between groups in the prevalence of diabetes without complications or in metastatic tumor (P greater than .05).
She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the potential for missing information and the inability of the researchers to determine which form of MS the patients had. “It might be that if we looked at just Medicare and Medicaid patients, these diagnoses would be a little bit different,” Dr. Kresa-Reahl added. “Maybe they would have more disability or more depression or more limited mobility. It’s hard to know, but this is a snapshot of people who have commercial insurance, so maybe they would be more likely to be employed.”
The study was sponsored by EMD Serono. Dr. Kresa-Reahl disclosed that she has received consulting fees from Biogen and EMD Serono; speakers fees and honoraria from Biogen, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, and Teva; and grant/research support from Biogen, Genentech, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis.
AT THE CMSC ANNUAL MEETING
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Of 10 common comorbidities, eight occurred significantly more frequently among MS patients, compared with those without the condition (P less than .0001 for all).
Data source: A retrospective analysis of claims data from 66,616 MS patients and 66,616 patients without the condition.
Disclosures: The study was sponsored by EMD Serono. Dr. Kresa-Reahl disclosed that she has received consulting fees from Biogen and EMD Serono; speakers fees and honoraria from Biogen, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, Novartis, and Teva; and grant/research support from Biogen, Genentech, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis.
Severe health conditions decline in childhood cancer survivors
CHICAGO – Severe health problems occurring 5 or more years after diagnosis of a childhood cancer have steadily declined, based on an analysis of 23,600 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, funded by the National Institutes of Health.
For all childhood cancer survivors, the 15-year cumulative incidence of severe health conditions decreased from 12.7% in those diagnosed in the 1970s, to 10.1% in the 1980s, and to 8.8% among those diagnosed in the 1990s (per 10 years: hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.89]), Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, reported at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The association with diagnosis decade was attenuated (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-1.00]) when detailed treatment data were included in the model, indicating that treatment reductions mediated risk.
Changes in childhood cancer treatment protocols to reduce the intensity of therapy – along with improved screening and early detection – have not only extended lifespan for many survivors, but also have reduced the incidence of serious chronic morbidity, Dr. Gibson said.
As the data address children diagnosed over 15 years ago, it is likely that improvements since then in determining patient risk and targeting therapy might result in further incremental improvements, he said in an interview.
By cancer type, severe health problems by 15 years after diagnosis decreased from 13% to 5% among survivors of Wilms’ tumor, from 18% to 11% among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma, from 15% to 9% among survivors of astrocytoma, from 10% to 6% among survivors of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and from 9% to 7% among survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The conclusions are based on the incidence of severe, disabling/life-threatening, or fatal chronic health conditions (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, grades 3-5) among 5-year survivors diagnosed prior to age 21 years from 1970 through 1999.
Adjusted for sex and attained age, significant reduction in risk over time was found among survivors of Wilms tumor (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.46-0.70]), Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65-0.85]), astrocytoma (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.92]), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.99]), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.98]).
The decreases in serious health conditions were largely driven by a reduced incidence of endocrine conditions (1970s: 4.0% vs. 1990s: 1.6%; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.59-0.73]) and subsequent malignant neoplasms (1970s: 2.4% vs. 1990s: 1.6%; HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96]).
Gastrointestinal (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.66-0.97]) and neurological conditions (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]) also were reduced, but cardiac and pulmonary conditions were not. Changes in childhood cancer treatment protocols have not only extended lifespan for many survivors, but also have reduced the incidence of serious chronic morbidity in this population, Dr. Gibson concluded.
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryjodales
CHICAGO – Severe health problems occurring 5 or more years after diagnosis of a childhood cancer have steadily declined, based on an analysis of 23,600 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, funded by the National Institutes of Health.
For all childhood cancer survivors, the 15-year cumulative incidence of severe health conditions decreased from 12.7% in those diagnosed in the 1970s, to 10.1% in the 1980s, and to 8.8% among those diagnosed in the 1990s (per 10 years: hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.89]), Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, reported at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The association with diagnosis decade was attenuated (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-1.00]) when detailed treatment data were included in the model, indicating that treatment reductions mediated risk.
Changes in childhood cancer treatment protocols to reduce the intensity of therapy – along with improved screening and early detection – have not only extended lifespan for many survivors, but also have reduced the incidence of serious chronic morbidity, Dr. Gibson said.
As the data address children diagnosed over 15 years ago, it is likely that improvements since then in determining patient risk and targeting therapy might result in further incremental improvements, he said in an interview.
By cancer type, severe health problems by 15 years after diagnosis decreased from 13% to 5% among survivors of Wilms’ tumor, from 18% to 11% among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma, from 15% to 9% among survivors of astrocytoma, from 10% to 6% among survivors of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and from 9% to 7% among survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The conclusions are based on the incidence of severe, disabling/life-threatening, or fatal chronic health conditions (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, grades 3-5) among 5-year survivors diagnosed prior to age 21 years from 1970 through 1999.
Adjusted for sex and attained age, significant reduction in risk over time was found among survivors of Wilms tumor (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.46-0.70]), Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65-0.85]), astrocytoma (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.92]), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.99]), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.98]).
The decreases in serious health conditions were largely driven by a reduced incidence of endocrine conditions (1970s: 4.0% vs. 1990s: 1.6%; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.59-0.73]) and subsequent malignant neoplasms (1970s: 2.4% vs. 1990s: 1.6%; HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96]).
Gastrointestinal (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.66-0.97]) and neurological conditions (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]) also were reduced, but cardiac and pulmonary conditions were not. Changes in childhood cancer treatment protocols have not only extended lifespan for many survivors, but also have reduced the incidence of serious chronic morbidity in this population, Dr. Gibson concluded.
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryjodales
CHICAGO – Severe health problems occurring 5 or more years after diagnosis of a childhood cancer have steadily declined, based on an analysis of 23,600 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, funded by the National Institutes of Health.
For all childhood cancer survivors, the 15-year cumulative incidence of severe health conditions decreased from 12.7% in those diagnosed in the 1970s, to 10.1% in the 1980s, and to 8.8% among those diagnosed in the 1990s (per 10 years: hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.89]), Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, reported at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The association with diagnosis decade was attenuated (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-1.00]) when detailed treatment data were included in the model, indicating that treatment reductions mediated risk.
Changes in childhood cancer treatment protocols to reduce the intensity of therapy – along with improved screening and early detection – have not only extended lifespan for many survivors, but also have reduced the incidence of serious chronic morbidity, Dr. Gibson said.
As the data address children diagnosed over 15 years ago, it is likely that improvements since then in determining patient risk and targeting therapy might result in further incremental improvements, he said in an interview.
By cancer type, severe health problems by 15 years after diagnosis decreased from 13% to 5% among survivors of Wilms’ tumor, from 18% to 11% among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma, from 15% to 9% among survivors of astrocytoma, from 10% to 6% among survivors of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and from 9% to 7% among survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The conclusions are based on the incidence of severe, disabling/life-threatening, or fatal chronic health conditions (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, grades 3-5) among 5-year survivors diagnosed prior to age 21 years from 1970 through 1999.
Adjusted for sex and attained age, significant reduction in risk over time was found among survivors of Wilms tumor (HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.46-0.70]), Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65-0.85]), astrocytoma (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64-0.92]), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.63-0.99]), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76-0.98]).
The decreases in serious health conditions were largely driven by a reduced incidence of endocrine conditions (1970s: 4.0% vs. 1990s: 1.6%; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.59-0.73]) and subsequent malignant neoplasms (1970s: 2.4% vs. 1990s: 1.6%; HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.76-0.96]).
Gastrointestinal (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.66-0.97]) and neurological conditions (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]) also were reduced, but cardiac and pulmonary conditions were not. Changes in childhood cancer treatment protocols have not only extended lifespan for many survivors, but also have reduced the incidence of serious chronic morbidity in this population, Dr. Gibson concluded.
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryjodales
AT ASCO 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: For all childhood cancer survivors, the 15-year cumulative incidence of severe health conditions decreased from 12.7% in those diagnosed in the 1970s, to 10.1% in the 1980s, and to 8.8% among those diagnosed in the 1990s (per 10 years: HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.80-0.89]).
Data source: An analysis of 23,600 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.
VIDEO: Low testosterone common after testicular cancer
CHICAGO – More than one-third of testicular cancer survivors have hypogonadism, according to an analysis of nearly 500 male patients conducted by the Platinum Study Group.
Lead author Mohammad Abu Zaid, MBBS, of Indiana University, Indianapolis, discusses the implications for long-term health, screening during follow-up, testing, and testosterone replacement therapy in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
CHICAGO – More than one-third of testicular cancer survivors have hypogonadism, according to an analysis of nearly 500 male patients conducted by the Platinum Study Group.
Lead author Mohammad Abu Zaid, MBBS, of Indiana University, Indianapolis, discusses the implications for long-term health, screening during follow-up, testing, and testosterone replacement therapy in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
CHICAGO – More than one-third of testicular cancer survivors have hypogonadism, according to an analysis of nearly 500 male patients conducted by the Platinum Study Group.
Lead author Mohammad Abu Zaid, MBBS, of Indiana University, Indianapolis, discusses the implications for long-term health, screening during follow-up, testing, and testosterone replacement therapy in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT ASCO 2017
VIDEO: Single dose of RT suffices, but will radiation oncologists adopt the strategy?
CHICAGO – The randomized SCORAD III trial shows that a single 8-Gy dose of radiation therapy has efficacy similar to that of a 20-Gy dose given over the course of a week for treating metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with modest survival, first author Peter Hoskin, MD, FCRP, FRCR, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. But will radiation oncologists adopt this new strategy?
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
CHICAGO – The randomized SCORAD III trial shows that a single 8-Gy dose of radiation therapy has efficacy similar to that of a 20-Gy dose given over the course of a week for treating metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with modest survival, first author Peter Hoskin, MD, FCRP, FRCR, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. But will radiation oncologists adopt this new strategy?
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
CHICAGO – The randomized SCORAD III trial shows that a single 8-Gy dose of radiation therapy has efficacy similar to that of a 20-Gy dose given over the course of a week for treating metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with modest survival, first author Peter Hoskin, MD, FCRP, FRCR, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. But will radiation oncologists adopt this new strategy?
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT ASCO 2017
VIDEO: Helping cancer patients cope with psychological side effects
CHICAGO – Oncologists are highly skilled at minimizing side effects associated with toxic but curative therapies, but are less adept at helping patients cope with the distress, anxiety, fear, and other emotions associated with cancer.
Three studies presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology detail randomized, controlled trials of psychological interventions aimed at helping patients cope with a new cancer diagnosis, reduce fears of a recurrence, and come to grips with the realities of advanced disease, including fears of death or disability.
Don S. Dizon, MD, from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, discusses the social and financial barriers that cancer patients face when they experience distress, and the difficulties that providers face with limited time and financial resources to help patients cope in this video interview.
Dr. Dizon reported having no relevant disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
CHICAGO – Oncologists are highly skilled at minimizing side effects associated with toxic but curative therapies, but are less adept at helping patients cope with the distress, anxiety, fear, and other emotions associated with cancer.
Three studies presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology detail randomized, controlled trials of psychological interventions aimed at helping patients cope with a new cancer diagnosis, reduce fears of a recurrence, and come to grips with the realities of advanced disease, including fears of death or disability.
Don S. Dizon, MD, from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, discusses the social and financial barriers that cancer patients face when they experience distress, and the difficulties that providers face with limited time and financial resources to help patients cope in this video interview.
Dr. Dizon reported having no relevant disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
CHICAGO – Oncologists are highly skilled at minimizing side effects associated with toxic but curative therapies, but are less adept at helping patients cope with the distress, anxiety, fear, and other emotions associated with cancer.
Three studies presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology detail randomized, controlled trials of psychological interventions aimed at helping patients cope with a new cancer diagnosis, reduce fears of a recurrence, and come to grips with the realities of advanced disease, including fears of death or disability.
Don S. Dizon, MD, from the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, discusses the social and financial barriers that cancer patients face when they experience distress, and the difficulties that providers face with limited time and financial resources to help patients cope in this video interview.
Dr. Dizon reported having no relevant disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT ASCO 2017
VIDEO: Childhood cancer survivors living longer with fewer severe health problems
CHICAGO – Severe health problems occurring 5 or more years after diagnosis of a childhood cancer have been steadily declining, based on an analysis of 23,600 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Watch our video interview with lead author Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, who reported the data at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryjodales
CHICAGO – Severe health problems occurring 5 or more years after diagnosis of a childhood cancer have been steadily declining, based on an analysis of 23,600 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Watch our video interview with lead author Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, who reported the data at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryjodales
CHICAGO – Severe health problems occurring 5 or more years after diagnosis of a childhood cancer have been steadily declining, based on an analysis of 23,600 participants in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS), funded by the National Institutes of Health.
Watch our video interview with lead author Todd M. Gibson, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, who reported the data at a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryjodales
AT ASCO 2017
Differences emerge in new guidelines for managing FN in kids
A multidisciplinary, international panel of experts has updated earlier clinical practice guidelines on managing fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer and in those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). And while most of the recommendations remained unchanged from the 2012 guidelines, a few key differences emerged. The changes included addition of a 4th generation cephalosporin for empirical antifungal therapy and refinements in risk stratification for invasive fungal disease (IFD), among others.
The new guidelines were published by The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The recommendations were organized into 3 major sections: initial presentation, ongoing management, and empirical antifungal therapy. The guidelines panel followed procedures previously validated for creating evidence-based guidelines and used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument as a framework.
For the initial presentation of FN, the panel increased the quality of evidence from low to moderate in the recommendation to obtain peripheral blood cultures concurrent with central venous catheter cultures.
In the treatment of FN, the panel added a 4th-generation cephalosporin as empirical therapy in high-risk FN.
The panel refined the IFD risk factors and decreased the quality of evidence from moderate to low. Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed acute leukemia, those undergoing allogeneic HSCT, those with prolonged neutropenia, and those receiving high-dose corticosteroids are at high risk of IFD. All others should be categorized as IFD low risk.
The panel suggested serum galactomannan not be used to guide empirical antifungal management for prolonged FN lasting 96 hours or more in high-risk IFD patients. GM does not rule out non-Aspergillus molds, and therefore high negative values provide less useful predictions. Previously, the use of galactomannan was a weak recommendation.
The panel added a new recommendation against using fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in blood. They explained PCR testing provides poor positive predictive values and negative predictive values are not sufficiently high to be clinically useful. Also, PCR testing is not yet standardized.
Another new recommendation is the addition of imaging of the abdomen in patients without localizing signs or symptoms. Even though the ideal imaging modality is not known, ultrasound is readily available, not associated with radiation exposure, and usually does not require sedation. For these reasons, the panel said it is preferable to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
The panel also changed a previously weak recommendation to administer empirical therapy for IFD low-risk patients with prolonged FN to a weak recommendation against administering therapy for these patients.
The panel's recommendations and their rationale can be found in the JCO article.
The guidelines update was supported by meeting grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Garron Comprehensive Cancer Centre.
A multidisciplinary, international panel of experts has updated earlier clinical practice guidelines on managing fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer and in those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). And while most of the recommendations remained unchanged from the 2012 guidelines, a few key differences emerged. The changes included addition of a 4th generation cephalosporin for empirical antifungal therapy and refinements in risk stratification for invasive fungal disease (IFD), among others.
The new guidelines were published by The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The recommendations were organized into 3 major sections: initial presentation, ongoing management, and empirical antifungal therapy. The guidelines panel followed procedures previously validated for creating evidence-based guidelines and used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument as a framework.
For the initial presentation of FN, the panel increased the quality of evidence from low to moderate in the recommendation to obtain peripheral blood cultures concurrent with central venous catheter cultures.
In the treatment of FN, the panel added a 4th-generation cephalosporin as empirical therapy in high-risk FN.
The panel refined the IFD risk factors and decreased the quality of evidence from moderate to low. Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed acute leukemia, those undergoing allogeneic HSCT, those with prolonged neutropenia, and those receiving high-dose corticosteroids are at high risk of IFD. All others should be categorized as IFD low risk.
The panel suggested serum galactomannan not be used to guide empirical antifungal management for prolonged FN lasting 96 hours or more in high-risk IFD patients. GM does not rule out non-Aspergillus molds, and therefore high negative values provide less useful predictions. Previously, the use of galactomannan was a weak recommendation.
The panel added a new recommendation against using fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in blood. They explained PCR testing provides poor positive predictive values and negative predictive values are not sufficiently high to be clinically useful. Also, PCR testing is not yet standardized.
Another new recommendation is the addition of imaging of the abdomen in patients without localizing signs or symptoms. Even though the ideal imaging modality is not known, ultrasound is readily available, not associated with radiation exposure, and usually does not require sedation. For these reasons, the panel said it is preferable to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
The panel also changed a previously weak recommendation to administer empirical therapy for IFD low-risk patients with prolonged FN to a weak recommendation against administering therapy for these patients.
The panel's recommendations and their rationale can be found in the JCO article.
The guidelines update was supported by meeting grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Garron Comprehensive Cancer Centre.
A multidisciplinary, international panel of experts has updated earlier clinical practice guidelines on managing fever and neutropenia (FN) in children with cancer and in those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). And while most of the recommendations remained unchanged from the 2012 guidelines, a few key differences emerged. The changes included addition of a 4th generation cephalosporin for empirical antifungal therapy and refinements in risk stratification for invasive fungal disease (IFD), among others.
The new guidelines were published by The International Pediatric Fever and Neutropenia Guideline Panel in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
The recommendations were organized into 3 major sections: initial presentation, ongoing management, and empirical antifungal therapy. The guidelines panel followed procedures previously validated for creating evidence-based guidelines and used the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument as a framework.
For the initial presentation of FN, the panel increased the quality of evidence from low to moderate in the recommendation to obtain peripheral blood cultures concurrent with central venous catheter cultures.
In the treatment of FN, the panel added a 4th-generation cephalosporin as empirical therapy in high-risk FN.
The panel refined the IFD risk factors and decreased the quality of evidence from moderate to low. Children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapsed acute leukemia, those undergoing allogeneic HSCT, those with prolonged neutropenia, and those receiving high-dose corticosteroids are at high risk of IFD. All others should be categorized as IFD low risk.
The panel suggested serum galactomannan not be used to guide empirical antifungal management for prolonged FN lasting 96 hours or more in high-risk IFD patients. GM does not rule out non-Aspergillus molds, and therefore high negative values provide less useful predictions. Previously, the use of galactomannan was a weak recommendation.
The panel added a new recommendation against using fungal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in blood. They explained PCR testing provides poor positive predictive values and negative predictive values are not sufficiently high to be clinically useful. Also, PCR testing is not yet standardized.
Another new recommendation is the addition of imaging of the abdomen in patients without localizing signs or symptoms. Even though the ideal imaging modality is not known, ultrasound is readily available, not associated with radiation exposure, and usually does not require sedation. For these reasons, the panel said it is preferable to computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
The panel also changed a previously weak recommendation to administer empirical therapy for IFD low-risk patients with prolonged FN to a weak recommendation against administering therapy for these patients.
The panel's recommendations and their rationale can be found in the JCO article.
The guidelines update was supported by meeting grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Garron Comprehensive Cancer Centre.
Access to ‘the little blue book’ just got a lot more expensive
“The little blue book” has been an office standard as long as I’ve been in practice. Every practice has a dog-eared copy in a drawer somewhere that’s constantly being pulled out to look up hospitals, other doctors, and pharmacies.
As small as it is, it’s pretty useful in the daily flow of my office routine.
Until now.
Sadly, 2016 was apparently the year I ordered my last copies. The publisher’s marketing people inform me that the paper version has been discontinued, and I can now get the digital version for only ... $500 per year.
Thanks, but no thanks.
I have nothing against digital editions. In fact, if it was the same price as the paper one, I’d get it. If I were a big practice that needed, say, 50 copies for the staff, the $500 per practice fee is a deal, compared with the $998 I’d pay for 50 paper copies.
But for my dinky little two-person practice? The difference between $39.90 and $500 just isn’t worth all the advantages a digital version may offer. For that kind of money, I’ll use Google.
This is another part of a gradual, and disturbing, trend in medicine: ignoring small practices. Large corporate practices are worth a lot more in sales than little one-to-three doctor groups, so companies, such as “the little blue book,” have no incentive to tailor their products to us. We have become medical persona non grata.
I understand this is a business decision. It’s not specifically directed at me.
Yet ...
I’ve been in practice for almost 20 years now, and buying two copies of the LBB is something I’ve done annually, in good and bad economic years. I’ve supported the publisher because it was a good product at a fair price. Sadly, they no longer find my little practice to be worth the effort or profit margin.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
“The little blue book” has been an office standard as long as I’ve been in practice. Every practice has a dog-eared copy in a drawer somewhere that’s constantly being pulled out to look up hospitals, other doctors, and pharmacies.
As small as it is, it’s pretty useful in the daily flow of my office routine.
Until now.
Sadly, 2016 was apparently the year I ordered my last copies. The publisher’s marketing people inform me that the paper version has been discontinued, and I can now get the digital version for only ... $500 per year.
Thanks, but no thanks.
I have nothing against digital editions. In fact, if it was the same price as the paper one, I’d get it. If I were a big practice that needed, say, 50 copies for the staff, the $500 per practice fee is a deal, compared with the $998 I’d pay for 50 paper copies.
But for my dinky little two-person practice? The difference between $39.90 and $500 just isn’t worth all the advantages a digital version may offer. For that kind of money, I’ll use Google.
This is another part of a gradual, and disturbing, trend in medicine: ignoring small practices. Large corporate practices are worth a lot more in sales than little one-to-three doctor groups, so companies, such as “the little blue book,” have no incentive to tailor their products to us. We have become medical persona non grata.
I understand this is a business decision. It’s not specifically directed at me.
Yet ...
I’ve been in practice for almost 20 years now, and buying two copies of the LBB is something I’ve done annually, in good and bad economic years. I’ve supported the publisher because it was a good product at a fair price. Sadly, they no longer find my little practice to be worth the effort or profit margin.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.
“The little blue book” has been an office standard as long as I’ve been in practice. Every practice has a dog-eared copy in a drawer somewhere that’s constantly being pulled out to look up hospitals, other doctors, and pharmacies.
As small as it is, it’s pretty useful in the daily flow of my office routine.
Until now.
Sadly, 2016 was apparently the year I ordered my last copies. The publisher’s marketing people inform me that the paper version has been discontinued, and I can now get the digital version for only ... $500 per year.
Thanks, but no thanks.
I have nothing against digital editions. In fact, if it was the same price as the paper one, I’d get it. If I were a big practice that needed, say, 50 copies for the staff, the $500 per practice fee is a deal, compared with the $998 I’d pay for 50 paper copies.
But for my dinky little two-person practice? The difference between $39.90 and $500 just isn’t worth all the advantages a digital version may offer. For that kind of money, I’ll use Google.
This is another part of a gradual, and disturbing, trend in medicine: ignoring small practices. Large corporate practices are worth a lot more in sales than little one-to-three doctor groups, so companies, such as “the little blue book,” have no incentive to tailor their products to us. We have become medical persona non grata.
I understand this is a business decision. It’s not specifically directed at me.
Yet ...
I’ve been in practice for almost 20 years now, and buying two copies of the LBB is something I’ve done annually, in good and bad economic years. I’ve supported the publisher because it was a good product at a fair price. Sadly, they no longer find my little practice to be worth the effort or profit margin.
Dr. Block has a solo neurology practice in Scottsdale, Ariz.