Astrocyte glutamine synthetase may play an important role in the etiology of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy suggests a recent review in the Journal of Neuroscience Research.

• Investigators from the Yale School of Medicine and Southern Illinois School of Medicine believe that inhibition, loss, or dysfunction of the enzyme in astrocytes may be one of the causative factors responsible for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
• Their review of the scientific evidence included a study of astrocyte abnormalities related to aquaporin 4, potassium channel Kir4.1, monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2, amino acid transporters EAAT1 and EAA2, and glutamine synthetase.
• Their theory on the role of glutamine synthetase prompted the researchers to suggest that the mechanisms that control the enzyme may be worth consideration as targets for new antiepileptic drugs.

Eid T, Lee TW, Patrylo P, Zaveri HP. Astrocytes and glutamine synthetase in epileptogenesis [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. J Neurosci Res. 2018: doi: 10.1002/jnr.24267.   

Astrocyte glutamine synthetase may play an important role in the etiology of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy suggests a recent review in the Journal of Neuroscience Research.

• Investigators from the Yale School of Medicine and Southern Illinois School of Medicine believe that inhibition, loss, or dysfunction of the enzyme in astrocytes may be one of the causative factors responsible for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
• Their review of the scientific evidence included a study of astrocyte abnormalities related to aquaporin 4, potassium channel Kir4.1, monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2, amino acid transporters EAAT1 and EAA2, and glutamine synthetase.
• Their theory on the role of glutamine synthetase prompted the researchers to suggest that the mechanisms that control the enzyme may be worth consideration as targets for new antiepileptic drugs.

Eid T, Lee TW, Patrylo P, Zaveri HP. Astrocytes and glutamine synthetase in epileptogenesis [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. J Neurosci Res. 2018: doi: 10.1002/jnr.24267.   

Astrocyte glutamine synthetase may play an important role in the etiology of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy suggests a recent review in the Journal of Neuroscience Research.

• Investigators from the Yale School of Medicine and Southern Illinois School of Medicine believe that inhibition, loss, or dysfunction of the enzyme in astrocytes may be one of the causative factors responsible for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
• Their review of the scientific evidence included a study of astrocyte abnormalities related to aquaporin 4, potassium channel Kir4.1, monocarboxylate transporters MCT1 and MCT2, amino acid transporters EAAT1 and EAA2, and glutamine synthetase.
• Their theory on the role of glutamine synthetase prompted the researchers to suggest that the mechanisms that control the enzyme may be worth consideration as targets for new antiepileptic drugs.

Eid T, Lee TW, Patrylo P, Zaveri HP. Astrocytes and glutamine synthetase in epileptogenesis [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. J Neurosci Res. 2018: doi: 10.1002/jnr.24267.   

The presence of interictal ripples in an intracranial EEG may serve as useful biomarkers suggests an analysis of data from 27 children who underwent epilepsy surgery.

• The average rate of onset ripples located inside a resected area of the brain predicted a patient’s outcome (odds ratio, 5.37, P=.02)
• Mean onset ripple rate was associated with the Engel class metric for measuring outcomes.
• Resection of the onset ripple zone was linked to good surgical outcomes (P=.047).
• On the other hand, there was no correlation between spread ripple zone, isolated-ripple zone, or spike zones and outcomes.

Tamilia E, Park EH, Percivati S, et al. Surgical resection of ripple onset predicts outcome in pediatric epilepsy [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. Ann Neurol.  2018: doi: 10.1002/ana.25295

The presence of interictal ripples in an intracranial EEG may serve as useful biomarkers suggests an analysis of data from 27 children who underwent epilepsy surgery.

• The average rate of onset ripples located inside a resected area of the brain predicted a patient’s outcome (odds ratio, 5.37, P=.02)
• Mean onset ripple rate was associated with the Engel class metric for measuring outcomes.
• Resection of the onset ripple zone was linked to good surgical outcomes (P=.047).
• On the other hand, there was no correlation between spread ripple zone, isolated-ripple zone, or spike zones and outcomes.

Tamilia E, Park EH, Percivati S, et al. Surgical resection of ripple onset predicts outcome in pediatric epilepsy [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. Ann Neurol.  2018: doi: 10.1002/ana.25295

The presence of interictal ripples in an intracranial EEG may serve as useful biomarkers suggests an analysis of data from 27 children who underwent epilepsy surgery.

• The average rate of onset ripples located inside a resected area of the brain predicted a patient’s outcome (odds ratio, 5.37, P=.02)
• Mean onset ripple rate was associated with the Engel class metric for measuring outcomes.
• Resection of the onset ripple zone was linked to good surgical outcomes (P=.047).
• On the other hand, there was no correlation between spread ripple zone, isolated-ripple zone, or spike zones and outcomes.

Tamilia E, Park EH, Percivati S, et al. Surgical resection of ripple onset predicts outcome in pediatric epilepsy [published online ahead of print July 18, 2018]. Ann Neurol.  2018: doi: 10.1002/ana.25295

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and network-based analyses can help characterize absence epilepsy in children according to a study that looked at 16 patients between ages 6 and 12 years who had absence epilepsy.

• Researchers found functional/anatomical hubs in a network that contained bilateral precuneus, left thalamus, three anterior cerebellar subunits of lobule IV-V, vermis, and lobule III.
• Their analysis suggests that these hubs, which are highly connected brain areas, exist in focal cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar areas during absence seizures.
• The existence of hubs in thalami, precuneus and cingulate cortex suggest bilaterally distributed networks of cortical and subcortical regions that may be responsible for seizures.
• Hubs in the anterior cerebellum may be related to terminating motor automatism seen in absence seizures.

Youssofzadeh, V, Agler W, Tenney JF, Kadis DS. Whole-brain MEG connectivity-based analyses reveals critical hubs in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:102-109.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and network-based analyses can help characterize absence epilepsy in children according to a study that looked at 16 patients between ages 6 and 12 years who had absence epilepsy.

• Researchers found functional/anatomical hubs in a network that contained bilateral precuneus, left thalamus, three anterior cerebellar subunits of lobule IV-V, vermis, and lobule III.
• Their analysis suggests that these hubs, which are highly connected brain areas, exist in focal cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar areas during absence seizures.
• The existence of hubs in thalami, precuneus and cingulate cortex suggest bilaterally distributed networks of cortical and subcortical regions that may be responsible for seizures.
• Hubs in the anterior cerebellum may be related to terminating motor automatism seen in absence seizures.

Youssofzadeh, V, Agler W, Tenney JF, Kadis DS. Whole-brain MEG connectivity-based analyses reveals critical hubs in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:102-109.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and network-based analyses can help characterize absence epilepsy in children according to a study that looked at 16 patients between ages 6 and 12 years who had absence epilepsy.

• Researchers found functional/anatomical hubs in a network that contained bilateral precuneus, left thalamus, three anterior cerebellar subunits of lobule IV-V, vermis, and lobule III.
• Their analysis suggests that these hubs, which are highly connected brain areas, exist in focal cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar areas during absence seizures.
• The existence of hubs in thalami, precuneus and cingulate cortex suggest bilaterally distributed networks of cortical and subcortical regions that may be responsible for seizures.
• Hubs in the anterior cerebellum may be related to terminating motor automatism seen in absence seizures.

Youssofzadeh, V, Agler W, Tenney JF, Kadis DS. Whole-brain MEG connectivity-based analyses reveals critical hubs in childhood absence epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:102-109.

K. Rajender Reddy, MD, discussed the management of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr), which can occur in the setting of treatment with immunosuppressive or direct-acting antiviral agents, HIV, or organ transplant. He discussed the mechanisms by which HBVr occurs despite serologic evidence of viral clearance, and he reviewed the American Gastroenterological Association Institute’s 2015 Clinical Decision Support Tool on managing HBVr. In patients treated with anti-TNF therapy, HBVr was seen almost exclusively in HBsAg+ patients and not HBsAg–/anti-HBc+ patients. Data supports HBV screening prior to starting anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy and prophylactic antiviral therapy for HBsAg-positive patients, Dr. Reddy explained.

Allison R. Schulman, MD, MPH then discussed endoscopic bariatric therapy for obesity. When he spoke about gastric interventions, he said that, although space-occupying devices have been shown to reduce weight and resolve comorbidities, they are more likely to be removed early because of intolerance and can be associated with serious adverse events (in less than 0.1%). He also said that endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty has been associated with significant weight loss and a beneficial effect on comorbidities and aspiration therapy has been associated with a 20%-25% total body weight loss over 1-2 years. With regard to small-bowel interventions, Dr. Schulman discussed sleeves and liners, mucosal resurfacing therapy, anastomosis and enteral diversion, and flow-altering therapy, none of which are Food and Drug Administration–approved. Endoscopic bariatric therapy options of both types fill a gap between medications and surgery, Dr. Schulman concluded, and are reversible, repeatable, and cost-effective and can be used in combination.

Neil H. Stollman, MD, AGAF, reviewed the role of fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) in gastrointestinal disorders and the variety of ways in which FMT can be administered. One of its main uses is for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI); this is the only indication for which the FDA will not require an investigational new drug permit. Dr. Stollman discussed current guidelines for FMT and said that systematic reviews have demonstrated that FMT has an overall cure rate of 85%-90% for rCDI with no or few adverse events. He recommended not resuming vancomycin after FMT and not retesting for rCDI unless the patient has suggestive symptoms. Currently, he noted, more than 180 clinical trials are studying the efficacy of FMT in other diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and liver disease.

Fasiha Kanwal, MD, MSHS, AGAF, who is editor in chief of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, presented the top three clinical papers published in that journal or in the journal Gastroenterology. The first paper, titled “Chromoendoscopy for surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: A systematic review of randomized trials” (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;15[11]:1684-97), found that chromoendoscopy identifies more patients with dysplasia when compared with standard-definition, white-light endoscopy. There was no direct evidence, however, of an effect on all-cause or cancer-specific mortality.

The second paper, “Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as second-line therapy for patients with autoimmune hepatitis” (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15[12]:1950-6), showed that both agents were generally well tolerated and that they were equally effective in patients who had responded completely to standard therapy but could not tolerate it. In nonresponders to standard therapy, tacrolimus was more effective.

Dr. Kanwal’s study entitled, “Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents” (Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153[4]:996-1005) was the third paper. This study found that sustained virologic response (SVR) resulted in a considerable reduction in the risk of HCC. However, the absolute risk of HCC was high in some patients who achieved sustained virologic response, including about 40% who had already progressed to cirrhosis, she said.
 

This is a summary provided by the moderator of one of the AGA Postgraduate Course sessions held at DDW 2018. Dr. Chang is the vice-chief of the Vatche and Tamar Manounkian division of digestive diseases, the program director of University of California, Los Angeles, GI fellowship program, the codirector of G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience, and a professor of medicine at UCLA. She is on the advisory board for Synergy, IM HealthSciences, and Salix; an adviser for Metameconnect.com and ModifyHealth; and a speaker for Allergan and Takeda.

K. Rajender Reddy, MD, discussed the management of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr), which can occur in the setting of treatment with immunosuppressive or direct-acting antiviral agents, HIV, or organ transplant. He discussed the mechanisms by which HBVr occurs despite serologic evidence of viral clearance, and he reviewed the American Gastroenterological Association Institute’s 2015 Clinical Decision Support Tool on managing HBVr. In patients treated with anti-TNF therapy, HBVr was seen almost exclusively in HBsAg+ patients and not HBsAg–/anti-HBc+ patients. Data supports HBV screening prior to starting anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy and prophylactic antiviral therapy for HBsAg-positive patients, Dr. Reddy explained.

Allison R. Schulman, MD, MPH then discussed endoscopic bariatric therapy for obesity. When he spoke about gastric interventions, he said that, although space-occupying devices have been shown to reduce weight and resolve comorbidities, they are more likely to be removed early because of intolerance and can be associated with serious adverse events (in less than 0.1%). He also said that endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty has been associated with significant weight loss and a beneficial effect on comorbidities and aspiration therapy has been associated with a 20%-25% total body weight loss over 1-2 years. With regard to small-bowel interventions, Dr. Schulman discussed sleeves and liners, mucosal resurfacing therapy, anastomosis and enteral diversion, and flow-altering therapy, none of which are Food and Drug Administration–approved. Endoscopic bariatric therapy options of both types fill a gap between medications and surgery, Dr. Schulman concluded, and are reversible, repeatable, and cost-effective and can be used in combination.

Neil H. Stollman, MD, AGAF, reviewed the role of fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) in gastrointestinal disorders and the variety of ways in which FMT can be administered. One of its main uses is for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI); this is the only indication for which the FDA will not require an investigational new drug permit. Dr. Stollman discussed current guidelines for FMT and said that systematic reviews have demonstrated that FMT has an overall cure rate of 85%-90% for rCDI with no or few adverse events. He recommended not resuming vancomycin after FMT and not retesting for rCDI unless the patient has suggestive symptoms. Currently, he noted, more than 180 clinical trials are studying the efficacy of FMT in other diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and liver disease.

Fasiha Kanwal, MD, MSHS, AGAF, who is editor in chief of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, presented the top three clinical papers published in that journal or in the journal Gastroenterology. The first paper, titled “Chromoendoscopy for surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: A systematic review of randomized trials” (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;15[11]:1684-97), found that chromoendoscopy identifies more patients with dysplasia when compared with standard-definition, white-light endoscopy. There was no direct evidence, however, of an effect on all-cause or cancer-specific mortality.

The second paper, “Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as second-line therapy for patients with autoimmune hepatitis” (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15[12]:1950-6), showed that both agents were generally well tolerated and that they were equally effective in patients who had responded completely to standard therapy but could not tolerate it. In nonresponders to standard therapy, tacrolimus was more effective.

Dr. Kanwal’s study entitled, “Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents” (Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153[4]:996-1005) was the third paper. This study found that sustained virologic response (SVR) resulted in a considerable reduction in the risk of HCC. However, the absolute risk of HCC was high in some patients who achieved sustained virologic response, including about 40% who had already progressed to cirrhosis, she said.
 

This is a summary provided by the moderator of one of the AGA Postgraduate Course sessions held at DDW 2018. Dr. Chang is the vice-chief of the Vatche and Tamar Manounkian division of digestive diseases, the program director of University of California, Los Angeles, GI fellowship program, the codirector of G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience, and a professor of medicine at UCLA. She is on the advisory board for Synergy, IM HealthSciences, and Salix; an adviser for Metameconnect.com and ModifyHealth; and a speaker for Allergan and Takeda.

K. Rajender Reddy, MD, discussed the management of hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr), which can occur in the setting of treatment with immunosuppressive or direct-acting antiviral agents, HIV, or organ transplant. He discussed the mechanisms by which HBVr occurs despite serologic evidence of viral clearance, and he reviewed the American Gastroenterological Association Institute’s 2015 Clinical Decision Support Tool on managing HBVr. In patients treated with anti-TNF therapy, HBVr was seen almost exclusively in HBsAg+ patients and not HBsAg–/anti-HBc+ patients. Data supports HBV screening prior to starting anti–tumor necrosis factor therapy and prophylactic antiviral therapy for HBsAg-positive patients, Dr. Reddy explained.

Allison R. Schulman, MD, MPH then discussed endoscopic bariatric therapy for obesity. When he spoke about gastric interventions, he said that, although space-occupying devices have been shown to reduce weight and resolve comorbidities, they are more likely to be removed early because of intolerance and can be associated with serious adverse events (in less than 0.1%). He also said that endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty has been associated with significant weight loss and a beneficial effect on comorbidities and aspiration therapy has been associated with a 20%-25% total body weight loss over 1-2 years. With regard to small-bowel interventions, Dr. Schulman discussed sleeves and liners, mucosal resurfacing therapy, anastomosis and enteral diversion, and flow-altering therapy, none of which are Food and Drug Administration–approved. Endoscopic bariatric therapy options of both types fill a gap between medications and surgery, Dr. Schulman concluded, and are reversible, repeatable, and cost-effective and can be used in combination.

Neil H. Stollman, MD, AGAF, reviewed the role of fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) in gastrointestinal disorders and the variety of ways in which FMT can be administered. One of its main uses is for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI); this is the only indication for which the FDA will not require an investigational new drug permit. Dr. Stollman discussed current guidelines for FMT and said that systematic reviews have demonstrated that FMT has an overall cure rate of 85%-90% for rCDI with no or few adverse events. He recommended not resuming vancomycin after FMT and not retesting for rCDI unless the patient has suggestive symptoms. Currently, he noted, more than 180 clinical trials are studying the efficacy of FMT in other diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, and liver disease.

Fasiha Kanwal, MD, MSHS, AGAF, who is editor in chief of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, presented the top three clinical papers published in that journal or in the journal Gastroenterology. The first paper, titled “Chromoendoscopy for surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: A systematic review of randomized trials” (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;15[11]:1684-97), found that chromoendoscopy identifies more patients with dysplasia when compared with standard-definition, white-light endoscopy. There was no direct evidence, however, of an effect on all-cause or cancer-specific mortality.

The second paper, “Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus as second-line therapy for patients with autoimmune hepatitis” (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15[12]:1950-6), showed that both agents were generally well tolerated and that they were equally effective in patients who had responded completely to standard therapy but could not tolerate it. In nonresponders to standard therapy, tacrolimus was more effective.

Dr. Kanwal’s study entitled, “Risk of hepatocellular cancer in HCV patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents” (Gastroenterology. 2017 Oct;153[4]:996-1005) was the third paper. This study found that sustained virologic response (SVR) resulted in a considerable reduction in the risk of HCC. However, the absolute risk of HCC was high in some patients who achieved sustained virologic response, including about 40% who had already progressed to cirrhosis, she said.
 

This is a summary provided by the moderator of one of the AGA Postgraduate Course sessions held at DDW 2018. Dr. Chang is the vice-chief of the Vatche and Tamar Manounkian division of digestive diseases, the program director of University of California, Los Angeles, GI fellowship program, the codirector of G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience, and a professor of medicine at UCLA. She is on the advisory board for Synergy, IM HealthSciences, and Salix; an adviser for Metameconnect.com and ModifyHealth; and a speaker for Allergan and Takeda.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved lusutrombopag (Mulpleta) for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo medical or dental procedures. The drug is expected to be available in the United States in September 2018.

The most common adverse event was headache, and the recommended dosage for lusutrombopag is 3 mg orally once daily with or without food for 7 days. Lusutrombopag is not indicated for general platelet normalization in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia. Full prescribing information and further information about the approval can be found on the FDA website.

Lusutrombopag was approved in Japan in 2015 for this indication and is slated to be evaluated by the European Medicines Agency in 2019. The drug is marketed by Shionogi.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved lusutrombopag (Mulpleta) for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo medical or dental procedures. The drug is expected to be available in the United States in September 2018.

The most common adverse event was headache, and the recommended dosage for lusutrombopag is 3 mg orally once daily with or without food for 7 days. Lusutrombopag is not indicated for general platelet normalization in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia. Full prescribing information and further information about the approval can be found on the FDA website.

Lusutrombopag was approved in Japan in 2015 for this indication and is slated to be evaluated by the European Medicines Agency in 2019. The drug is marketed by Shionogi.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved lusutrombopag (Mulpleta) for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease who are scheduled to undergo medical or dental procedures. The drug is expected to be available in the United States in September 2018.

The most common adverse event was headache, and the recommended dosage for lusutrombopag is 3 mg orally once daily with or without food for 7 days. Lusutrombopag is not indicated for general platelet normalization in patients with chronic liver disease and thrombocytopenia. Full prescribing information and further information about the approval can be found on the FDA website.

Lusutrombopag was approved in Japan in 2015 for this indication and is slated to be evaluated by the European Medicines Agency in 2019. The drug is marketed by Shionogi.

[email protected]

A behavioral “nudge” intervention, targeting primary care prescribers who have particularly high off-label prescription rates of the antipsychotic quetiapine fumarate to older and disabled adults, has shown significant and long-lasting reductions in prescriptions.

A study, published Aug. 1 online by JAMA Psychiatry, looked at the effect of a “peer-comparison” letter, compared with a placebo letter, sent to 5,055 high quetiapine-prescribing primary care physicians in the Medicare program.

The letters said that the physicians’ quetiapine prescribing was extremely high, compared with their peers’ prescribing in the same state. Furthermore, the letters said the high-volume prescribers’ practices were under review because of concerns over medically unjustified use. They also encouraged the doctors to review their prescribing habits, while the placebo letter simply discussed an unrelated Medicare enrollment regulation.

Over the 9-month study, researchers saw a significant 11.1% reduction in the total number days of quetiapine prescribing among physicians who received the intervention letter, compared with those who received the control letter (95% confidence interval, –13.1 to –9.2 days; P less than .001; adjusted difference, –319 days; 95% CI, –374 to –263 days; P less than .001). At 2 years, the cumulative reduction was 15.6% fewer days in the intervention group (95% CI, –18.1 to –13.0; P less than .001), compared with the control group.

The study also used Medicare data to look at the impact on patients and found that individuals whose physicians were in the intervention arm had 3.9% fewer days of quetiapine usage over the 9 months (95% CI, –5.0 to –2.9; P less than 0.11), compared with those in the control arm. The reduction was even greater among patients whose indications for quetiapine were deemed to be of “low value,” as opposed to those who were prescribed for guideline-concordant indications, reported Adam Sacarny, PhD, of Columbia University, New York, and his coauthors.

When researchers looked in more detail at the reductions in prescriptions for guideline-concordant patients, they found that much of this was offset by prescriptions from other prescribers; in particular, physicians with psychiatric specialization or other study prescribers who the patient had not previously received a quetiapine prescription from.

The authors noted that the reductions for guideline-concordant patients could have negative effects if prescribers were reducing their quetiapine prescriptions indiscriminately.

“If this represented a harmful change for patients, we may have expected to see higher rates of adverse outcomes in the guideline-concordant patient group as prescribing rates decreased,” wrote Dr. Sacarny, and his coauthors. “However, if anything, guideline-concordant patients experienced lower rates of hospital encounters after the intervention.”

The study did not see any evidence of substitution to other antipsychotics, nor was any significant difference found in hospital use or mortality between the two arms of the study.

Dr. Sacarny and his coauthors cited several limitations. One is that the analysis looked at prescribing covered by Medicare Part D only. Nevertheless, they said, the results show the impact that peer comparison letters can have on prescribing patterns.

“These results provide encouraging evidence that high prescribers of antipsychotics can decrease quetiapine prescribing, without adverse clinical consequences, in response to a letter highlighting their overall high rates of prescribing,” the authors wrote.

The study was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab North America, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. No conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Sacarny A et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 1. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1867.


 

A behavioral “nudge” intervention, targeting primary care prescribers who have particularly high off-label prescription rates of the antipsychotic quetiapine fumarate to older and disabled adults, has shown significant and long-lasting reductions in prescriptions.

A study, published Aug. 1 online by JAMA Psychiatry, looked at the effect of a “peer-comparison” letter, compared with a placebo letter, sent to 5,055 high quetiapine-prescribing primary care physicians in the Medicare program.

The letters said that the physicians’ quetiapine prescribing was extremely high, compared with their peers’ prescribing in the same state. Furthermore, the letters said the high-volume prescribers’ practices were under review because of concerns over medically unjustified use. They also encouraged the doctors to review their prescribing habits, while the placebo letter simply discussed an unrelated Medicare enrollment regulation.

Over the 9-month study, researchers saw a significant 11.1% reduction in the total number days of quetiapine prescribing among physicians who received the intervention letter, compared with those who received the control letter (95% confidence interval, –13.1 to –9.2 days; P less than .001; adjusted difference, –319 days; 95% CI, –374 to –263 days; P less than .001). At 2 years, the cumulative reduction was 15.6% fewer days in the intervention group (95% CI, –18.1 to –13.0; P less than .001), compared with the control group.

The study also used Medicare data to look at the impact on patients and found that individuals whose physicians were in the intervention arm had 3.9% fewer days of quetiapine usage over the 9 months (95% CI, –5.0 to –2.9; P less than 0.11), compared with those in the control arm. The reduction was even greater among patients whose indications for quetiapine were deemed to be of “low value,” as opposed to those who were prescribed for guideline-concordant indications, reported Adam Sacarny, PhD, of Columbia University, New York, and his coauthors.

When researchers looked in more detail at the reductions in prescriptions for guideline-concordant patients, they found that much of this was offset by prescriptions from other prescribers; in particular, physicians with psychiatric specialization or other study prescribers who the patient had not previously received a quetiapine prescription from.

The authors noted that the reductions for guideline-concordant patients could have negative effects if prescribers were reducing their quetiapine prescriptions indiscriminately.

“If this represented a harmful change for patients, we may have expected to see higher rates of adverse outcomes in the guideline-concordant patient group as prescribing rates decreased,” wrote Dr. Sacarny, and his coauthors. “However, if anything, guideline-concordant patients experienced lower rates of hospital encounters after the intervention.”

The study did not see any evidence of substitution to other antipsychotics, nor was any significant difference found in hospital use or mortality between the two arms of the study.

Dr. Sacarny and his coauthors cited several limitations. One is that the analysis looked at prescribing covered by Medicare Part D only. Nevertheless, they said, the results show the impact that peer comparison letters can have on prescribing patterns.

“These results provide encouraging evidence that high prescribers of antipsychotics can decrease quetiapine prescribing, without adverse clinical consequences, in response to a letter highlighting their overall high rates of prescribing,” the authors wrote.

The study was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab North America, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. No conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Sacarny A et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 1. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1867.


 

A behavioral “nudge” intervention, targeting primary care prescribers who have particularly high off-label prescription rates of the antipsychotic quetiapine fumarate to older and disabled adults, has shown significant and long-lasting reductions in prescriptions.

A study, published Aug. 1 online by JAMA Psychiatry, looked at the effect of a “peer-comparison” letter, compared with a placebo letter, sent to 5,055 high quetiapine-prescribing primary care physicians in the Medicare program.

The letters said that the physicians’ quetiapine prescribing was extremely high, compared with their peers’ prescribing in the same state. Furthermore, the letters said the high-volume prescribers’ practices were under review because of concerns over medically unjustified use. They also encouraged the doctors to review their prescribing habits, while the placebo letter simply discussed an unrelated Medicare enrollment regulation.

Over the 9-month study, researchers saw a significant 11.1% reduction in the total number days of quetiapine prescribing among physicians who received the intervention letter, compared with those who received the control letter (95% confidence interval, –13.1 to –9.2 days; P less than .001; adjusted difference, –319 days; 95% CI, –374 to –263 days; P less than .001). At 2 years, the cumulative reduction was 15.6% fewer days in the intervention group (95% CI, –18.1 to –13.0; P less than .001), compared with the control group.

The study also used Medicare data to look at the impact on patients and found that individuals whose physicians were in the intervention arm had 3.9% fewer days of quetiapine usage over the 9 months (95% CI, –5.0 to –2.9; P less than 0.11), compared with those in the control arm. The reduction was even greater among patients whose indications for quetiapine were deemed to be of “low value,” as opposed to those who were prescribed for guideline-concordant indications, reported Adam Sacarny, PhD, of Columbia University, New York, and his coauthors.

When researchers looked in more detail at the reductions in prescriptions for guideline-concordant patients, they found that much of this was offset by prescriptions from other prescribers; in particular, physicians with psychiatric specialization or other study prescribers who the patient had not previously received a quetiapine prescription from.

The authors noted that the reductions for guideline-concordant patients could have negative effects if prescribers were reducing their quetiapine prescriptions indiscriminately.

“If this represented a harmful change for patients, we may have expected to see higher rates of adverse outcomes in the guideline-concordant patient group as prescribing rates decreased,” wrote Dr. Sacarny, and his coauthors. “However, if anything, guideline-concordant patients experienced lower rates of hospital encounters after the intervention.”

The study did not see any evidence of substitution to other antipsychotics, nor was any significant difference found in hospital use or mortality between the two arms of the study.

Dr. Sacarny and his coauthors cited several limitations. One is that the analysis looked at prescribing covered by Medicare Part D only. Nevertheless, they said, the results show the impact that peer comparison letters can have on prescribing patterns.

“These results provide encouraging evidence that high prescribers of antipsychotics can decrease quetiapine prescribing, without adverse clinical consequences, in response to a letter highlighting their overall high rates of prescribing,” the authors wrote.

The study was supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab North America, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. No conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Sacarny A et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 1. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1867.


 

Surveillance endoscopy should be spaced at 1 and 3 years after complete eradication of low-grade intestinal metaplasia and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually in cases of high-grade dysplasia, researchers wrote in Gastroenterology.

This “much-attenuated schedule of surveillance endoscopy would provide protection from invasive adenocarcinoma,” wrote Cary C. Cotton, MD, of the department of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with his associates. Following this schedule could prevent unnecessary endoscopies while still detecting unresectable cancers at rates under 1 in 1,000 endoscopies, they added.

Barrett’s esophagus recurs in at least one in four cases after successful radiofrequency ablation, the researchers noted. Therefore, surveillance endoscopy is recommended after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, but only expert opinion informs the frequency of surveillance. This study modeled and validated rates of neoplastic recurrence by using data from the United States Radiofrequency Ablation Registry during 2004-2013 and from the United Kingdom National Halo Registry during 2007-2015.

In line with prior research, predictors of neoplastic recurrence included baseline histologic grade, age, sex, endoscopic mucosal resection, and baseline length of Barrett’s esophagus, the researchers said. The strongest predictor of recurrence was the most severe histologic grade identified before complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia. After controlling for covariates, a model based only on most-severe baseline histology predicted neoplastic recurrence with a C statistic of 0.892 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.92) in the United States Radiofrequency Ablation Registry.

Dysplasia recurred at similar rates regardless of whether patients had nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus or indeterminate dysplasia. Recurrence rates also were similar between patients with high-grade dysplasia and patients with intramucosal carcinoma. Thus, the researchers identified three risk groups based on most-severe baseline histology: dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus or indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade lesions or intramucosal adenocarcinoma.

The annual rate of any-grade neoplastic recurrence was 0.19% in the lowest-risk group, 1.98% in the intermediate-risk group, and 5.93% in the highest-risk group. “In the higher-risk groups, neoplastic recurrence occurred at a higher rate in the first year, but at a constant estimated rate thereafter,” the investigators wrote. Among 114 initial cases of neoplastic recurrence, 1.8% were esophageal adenocarcinoma and another 1.8% of patients developed esophageal adenocarcinoma within 6 months.

The researchers then modeled surveillance intervals by assuming a 2.9% rate of neoplastic recurrence per visit, which yielded a 0.1% rate of invasive adenocarcinoma. “This level of risk tolerance was chosen so that the risk of complications from surveillance endoscopy – approximately one in 1,000 in this patient population – would roughly approximate the risk of invasive carcinoma discovered at the exam,” they wrote. For patients at higher risk of endoscopic complications, they set the rate of neoplastic recurrence at 5.7%, which yielded a 0.2% rate of invasive cancer. “As would be expected, the higher the risk tolerance, the longer the period between endoscopic surveillance intervals.”

Based on the model, the researchers proposed surveillance intervals of 1 year, followed by 3 years, followed by more than 5 years for patients with completely eradicated low-grade dysplasia. For cases of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ, the proposed surveillance intervals were 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually. The model also performed well when applied to data from the United Kingdom National Halo Registry, the investigators said, noting that their approach was the first to directly establish an evidence base for surveillance practices in Barrett’s esophagus.

SOURCE: Cotton CC et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr 12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.011.

Surveillance endoscopy should be spaced at 1 and 3 years after complete eradication of low-grade intestinal metaplasia and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually in cases of high-grade dysplasia, researchers wrote in Gastroenterology.

This “much-attenuated schedule of surveillance endoscopy would provide protection from invasive adenocarcinoma,” wrote Cary C. Cotton, MD, of the department of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with his associates. Following this schedule could prevent unnecessary endoscopies while still detecting unresectable cancers at rates under 1 in 1,000 endoscopies, they added.

Barrett’s esophagus recurs in at least one in four cases after successful radiofrequency ablation, the researchers noted. Therefore, surveillance endoscopy is recommended after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, but only expert opinion informs the frequency of surveillance. This study modeled and validated rates of neoplastic recurrence by using data from the United States Radiofrequency Ablation Registry during 2004-2013 and from the United Kingdom National Halo Registry during 2007-2015.

In line with prior research, predictors of neoplastic recurrence included baseline histologic grade, age, sex, endoscopic mucosal resection, and baseline length of Barrett’s esophagus, the researchers said. The strongest predictor of recurrence was the most severe histologic grade identified before complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia. After controlling for covariates, a model based only on most-severe baseline histology predicted neoplastic recurrence with a C statistic of 0.892 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.92) in the United States Radiofrequency Ablation Registry.

Dysplasia recurred at similar rates regardless of whether patients had nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus or indeterminate dysplasia. Recurrence rates also were similar between patients with high-grade dysplasia and patients with intramucosal carcinoma. Thus, the researchers identified three risk groups based on most-severe baseline histology: dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus or indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade lesions or intramucosal adenocarcinoma.

The annual rate of any-grade neoplastic recurrence was 0.19% in the lowest-risk group, 1.98% in the intermediate-risk group, and 5.93% in the highest-risk group. “In the higher-risk groups, neoplastic recurrence occurred at a higher rate in the first year, but at a constant estimated rate thereafter,” the investigators wrote. Among 114 initial cases of neoplastic recurrence, 1.8% were esophageal adenocarcinoma and another 1.8% of patients developed esophageal adenocarcinoma within 6 months.

The researchers then modeled surveillance intervals by assuming a 2.9% rate of neoplastic recurrence per visit, which yielded a 0.1% rate of invasive adenocarcinoma. “This level of risk tolerance was chosen so that the risk of complications from surveillance endoscopy – approximately one in 1,000 in this patient population – would roughly approximate the risk of invasive carcinoma discovered at the exam,” they wrote. For patients at higher risk of endoscopic complications, they set the rate of neoplastic recurrence at 5.7%, which yielded a 0.2% rate of invasive cancer. “As would be expected, the higher the risk tolerance, the longer the period between endoscopic surveillance intervals.”

Based on the model, the researchers proposed surveillance intervals of 1 year, followed by 3 years, followed by more than 5 years for patients with completely eradicated low-grade dysplasia. For cases of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ, the proposed surveillance intervals were 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually. The model also performed well when applied to data from the United Kingdom National Halo Registry, the investigators said, noting that their approach was the first to directly establish an evidence base for surveillance practices in Barrett’s esophagus.

SOURCE: Cotton CC et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr 12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.011.

Surveillance endoscopy should be spaced at 1 and 3 years after complete eradication of low-grade intestinal metaplasia and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually in cases of high-grade dysplasia, researchers wrote in Gastroenterology.

This “much-attenuated schedule of surveillance endoscopy would provide protection from invasive adenocarcinoma,” wrote Cary C. Cotton, MD, of the department of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with his associates. Following this schedule could prevent unnecessary endoscopies while still detecting unresectable cancers at rates under 1 in 1,000 endoscopies, they added.

Barrett’s esophagus recurs in at least one in four cases after successful radiofrequency ablation, the researchers noted. Therefore, surveillance endoscopy is recommended after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, but only expert opinion informs the frequency of surveillance. This study modeled and validated rates of neoplastic recurrence by using data from the United States Radiofrequency Ablation Registry during 2004-2013 and from the United Kingdom National Halo Registry during 2007-2015.

In line with prior research, predictors of neoplastic recurrence included baseline histologic grade, age, sex, endoscopic mucosal resection, and baseline length of Barrett’s esophagus, the researchers said. The strongest predictor of recurrence was the most severe histologic grade identified before complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia. After controlling for covariates, a model based only on most-severe baseline histology predicted neoplastic recurrence with a C statistic of 0.892 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.92) in the United States Radiofrequency Ablation Registry.

Dysplasia recurred at similar rates regardless of whether patients had nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus or indeterminate dysplasia. Recurrence rates also were similar between patients with high-grade dysplasia and patients with intramucosal carcinoma. Thus, the researchers identified three risk groups based on most-severe baseline histology: dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus or indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade lesions or intramucosal adenocarcinoma.

The annual rate of any-grade neoplastic recurrence was 0.19% in the lowest-risk group, 1.98% in the intermediate-risk group, and 5.93% in the highest-risk group. “In the higher-risk groups, neoplastic recurrence occurred at a higher rate in the first year, but at a constant estimated rate thereafter,” the investigators wrote. Among 114 initial cases of neoplastic recurrence, 1.8% were esophageal adenocarcinoma and another 1.8% of patients developed esophageal adenocarcinoma within 6 months.

The researchers then modeled surveillance intervals by assuming a 2.9% rate of neoplastic recurrence per visit, which yielded a 0.1% rate of invasive adenocarcinoma. “This level of risk tolerance was chosen so that the risk of complications from surveillance endoscopy – approximately one in 1,000 in this patient population – would roughly approximate the risk of invasive carcinoma discovered at the exam,” they wrote. For patients at higher risk of endoscopic complications, they set the rate of neoplastic recurrence at 5.7%, which yielded a 0.2% rate of invasive cancer. “As would be expected, the higher the risk tolerance, the longer the period between endoscopic surveillance intervals.”

Based on the model, the researchers proposed surveillance intervals of 1 year, followed by 3 years, followed by more than 5 years for patients with completely eradicated low-grade dysplasia. For cases of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ, the proposed surveillance intervals were 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and then annually. The model also performed well when applied to data from the United Kingdom National Halo Registry, the investigators said, noting that their approach was the first to directly establish an evidence base for surveillance practices in Barrett’s esophagus.

SOURCE: Cotton CC et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr 12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.011.

LOS ANGELES—Laterality is an independent predictor of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with an NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 12 or lower, according to research described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “There may be a need for a laterality-based NIHSS score or at least a conscious effort to look for right-hemisphere strokes with a large-vessel occlusion,” said Shashvat Desai, MD, a neurology trainee at the University of Pittsburgh.

Endovascular thrombectomy is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke resulting from a large-vessel occlusion. Among the eligibility criteria for thrombectomy is an NIHSS score of 6 or higher.

“The NIHSS score is biased and will allow a higher score for dominant-hemisphere strokes, as compared with nondominant-hemisphere strokes,” said Dr. Desai. “Seven points on this scale are directly related to language, which is a dominant-hemisphere function, and only two points are for neglect, which occurs during nondominant-hemisphere strokes.”

A Retrospective Data Analysis

To test their hypothesis that NIHSS score hemispheric lateralization bias affects stroke patient selection for acute endovascular thrombectomy, Dr. Desai and colleagues analyzed data from consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke resulting from large-vessel occlusion who were admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between June 2015 and December 2016. Eligible patients were identified within 24 hours of when they were last known to be well, were functionally independent at baseline, had an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) score of 6 or higher, and had an NIHSS score of 6 or higher. The investigators included 211 patients in their study. They examined variables such as age, NIHSS score, occlusion location, baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, time to presentation, and treatment received. When they separated patients with left-hemisphere strokes from those with right-hemisphere strokes, they found that the two groups were well matched in terms of age, gender, and site of occlusion. The median admission NIHSS score was 19 for left-hemisphere strokes and 15 for right-hemisphere strokes, and the difference between groups was statistically significant.

Thrombectomy Was More Common for Left-Hemisphere Strokes

Endovascular thrombectomy was performed for 87% of left-hemisphere strokes, compared with 78% of right-hemisphere strokes, and the difference between groups was statistically significant. When the researchers examined only participants with a low NIHSS score (ie, 12 or lower), they found that thrombectomy was performed in 81% of left-hemisphere strokes, compared with 52% of right-hemisphere strokes. The difference in the rate of treatment was statistically significant. Among patients with a high NIHSS score (ie, higher than 12), endovascular therapy was performed in 88% of participants, regardless of laterality.

A regression analysis that included variables such as age, sex, occlusion location, time to presentation, ASPECT score, IV t-PA, and laterality indicated that laterality was the sole and independent predictor of receiving endovascular thrombectomy in patients with low NIHSS score. “The preservation of language in right-hemisphere strokes with low NIHSS score reduces the chances of receiving endovascular thrombectomy,” said Dr. Desai.

Among patients with low NIHSS scores who received thrombectomy, the rate of good outcome (ie, an mRS score of 0 to 2) at three months was 88% for left-hemisphere strokes and 71% for right-hemisphere strokes. This difference was not statistically significant. Among all patients with low NIHSS scores, irrespective of treatment, 86% of left-hemisphere strokes had a good outcome, compared with 48% of right-hemisphere strokes. This difference was statistically significant.

—Erik Greb

LOS ANGELES—Laterality is an independent predictor of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with an NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 12 or lower, according to research described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “There may be a need for a laterality-based NIHSS score or at least a conscious effort to look for right-hemisphere strokes with a large-vessel occlusion,” said Shashvat Desai, MD, a neurology trainee at the University of Pittsburgh.

Endovascular thrombectomy is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke resulting from a large-vessel occlusion. Among the eligibility criteria for thrombectomy is an NIHSS score of 6 or higher.

“The NIHSS score is biased and will allow a higher score for dominant-hemisphere strokes, as compared with nondominant-hemisphere strokes,” said Dr. Desai. “Seven points on this scale are directly related to language, which is a dominant-hemisphere function, and only two points are for neglect, which occurs during nondominant-hemisphere strokes.”

A Retrospective Data Analysis

To test their hypothesis that NIHSS score hemispheric lateralization bias affects stroke patient selection for acute endovascular thrombectomy, Dr. Desai and colleagues analyzed data from consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke resulting from large-vessel occlusion who were admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between June 2015 and December 2016. Eligible patients were identified within 24 hours of when they were last known to be well, were functionally independent at baseline, had an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) score of 6 or higher, and had an NIHSS score of 6 or higher. The investigators included 211 patients in their study. They examined variables such as age, NIHSS score, occlusion location, baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, time to presentation, and treatment received. When they separated patients with left-hemisphere strokes from those with right-hemisphere strokes, they found that the two groups were well matched in terms of age, gender, and site of occlusion. The median admission NIHSS score was 19 for left-hemisphere strokes and 15 for right-hemisphere strokes, and the difference between groups was statistically significant.

Thrombectomy Was More Common for Left-Hemisphere Strokes

Endovascular thrombectomy was performed for 87% of left-hemisphere strokes, compared with 78% of right-hemisphere strokes, and the difference between groups was statistically significant. When the researchers examined only participants with a low NIHSS score (ie, 12 or lower), they found that thrombectomy was performed in 81% of left-hemisphere strokes, compared with 52% of right-hemisphere strokes. The difference in the rate of treatment was statistically significant. Among patients with a high NIHSS score (ie, higher than 12), endovascular therapy was performed in 88% of participants, regardless of laterality.

A regression analysis that included variables such as age, sex, occlusion location, time to presentation, ASPECT score, IV t-PA, and laterality indicated that laterality was the sole and independent predictor of receiving endovascular thrombectomy in patients with low NIHSS score. “The preservation of language in right-hemisphere strokes with low NIHSS score reduces the chances of receiving endovascular thrombectomy,” said Dr. Desai.

Among patients with low NIHSS scores who received thrombectomy, the rate of good outcome (ie, an mRS score of 0 to 2) at three months was 88% for left-hemisphere strokes and 71% for right-hemisphere strokes. This difference was not statistically significant. Among all patients with low NIHSS scores, irrespective of treatment, 86% of left-hemisphere strokes had a good outcome, compared with 48% of right-hemisphere strokes. This difference was statistically significant.

—Erik Greb

LOS ANGELES—Laterality is an independent predictor of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with an NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 12 or lower, according to research described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “There may be a need for a laterality-based NIHSS score or at least a conscious effort to look for right-hemisphere strokes with a large-vessel occlusion,” said Shashvat Desai, MD, a neurology trainee at the University of Pittsburgh.

Endovascular thrombectomy is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke resulting from a large-vessel occlusion. Among the eligibility criteria for thrombectomy is an NIHSS score of 6 or higher.

“The NIHSS score is biased and will allow a higher score for dominant-hemisphere strokes, as compared with nondominant-hemisphere strokes,” said Dr. Desai. “Seven points on this scale are directly related to language, which is a dominant-hemisphere function, and only two points are for neglect, which occurs during nondominant-hemisphere strokes.”

A Retrospective Data Analysis

To test their hypothesis that NIHSS score hemispheric lateralization bias affects stroke patient selection for acute endovascular thrombectomy, Dr. Desai and colleagues analyzed data from consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke resulting from large-vessel occlusion who were admitted to a comprehensive stroke center between June 2015 and December 2016. Eligible patients were identified within 24 hours of when they were last known to be well, were functionally independent at baseline, had an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT (ASPECT) score of 6 or higher, and had an NIHSS score of 6 or higher. The investigators included 211 patients in their study. They examined variables such as age, NIHSS score, occlusion location, baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, time to presentation, and treatment received. When they separated patients with left-hemisphere strokes from those with right-hemisphere strokes, they found that the two groups were well matched in terms of age, gender, and site of occlusion. The median admission NIHSS score was 19 for left-hemisphere strokes and 15 for right-hemisphere strokes, and the difference between groups was statistically significant.

Thrombectomy Was More Common for Left-Hemisphere Strokes

Endovascular thrombectomy was performed for 87% of left-hemisphere strokes, compared with 78% of right-hemisphere strokes, and the difference between groups was statistically significant. When the researchers examined only participants with a low NIHSS score (ie, 12 or lower), they found that thrombectomy was performed in 81% of left-hemisphere strokes, compared with 52% of right-hemisphere strokes. The difference in the rate of treatment was statistically significant. Among patients with a high NIHSS score (ie, higher than 12), endovascular therapy was performed in 88% of participants, regardless of laterality.

A regression analysis that included variables such as age, sex, occlusion location, time to presentation, ASPECT score, IV t-PA, and laterality indicated that laterality was the sole and independent predictor of receiving endovascular thrombectomy in patients with low NIHSS score. “The preservation of language in right-hemisphere strokes with low NIHSS score reduces the chances of receiving endovascular thrombectomy,” said Dr. Desai.

Among patients with low NIHSS scores who received thrombectomy, the rate of good outcome (ie, an mRS score of 0 to 2) at three months was 88% for left-hemisphere strokes and 71% for right-hemisphere strokes. This difference was not statistically significant. Among all patients with low NIHSS scores, irrespective of treatment, 86% of left-hemisphere strokes had a good outcome, compared with 48% of right-hemisphere strokes. This difference was statistically significant.

—Erik Greb

SAN FRANCISCO—Among patients with acute migraine, significant and durable clinical effects were seen with a single dose of rimegepant across multiple outcome measures, including pain freedom, freedom from most bothersome symptom, pain relief, and recovery of normal function, according to data presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Rimegepant (75 mg oral tablet) demonstrated favorable tolerability and safety, including a liver safety profile, similar to placebo. “These clinically meaningful results complement the benefits seen in an identical phase III study and a previous phase IIb study,” said Richard B. Lipton, MD, Edwin S. Lowe Chair in Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, and colleagues. “Rimegepant may ultimately offer patients a novel approach for the acute treatment of migraine.”

Dr. Lipton and colleagues conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist rimegepant (75 mg oral tablet) with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine in adults.

SAN FRANCISCO—Among patients with acute migraine, significant and durable clinical effects were seen with a single dose of rimegepant across multiple outcome measures, including pain freedom, freedom from most bothersome symptom, pain relief, and recovery of normal function, according to data presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Rimegepant (75 mg oral tablet) demonstrated favorable tolerability and safety, including a liver safety profile, similar to placebo. “These clinically meaningful results complement the benefits seen in an identical phase III study and a previous phase IIb study,” said Richard B. Lipton, MD, Edwin S. Lowe Chair in Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, and colleagues. “Rimegepant may ultimately offer patients a novel approach for the acute treatment of migraine.”

Dr. Lipton and colleagues conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist rimegepant (75 mg oral tablet) with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine in adults.

SAN FRANCISCO—Among patients with acute migraine, significant and durable clinical effects were seen with a single dose of rimegepant across multiple outcome measures, including pain freedom, freedom from most bothersome symptom, pain relief, and recovery of normal function, according to data presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Rimegepant (75 mg oral tablet) demonstrated favorable tolerability and safety, including a liver safety profile, similar to placebo. “These clinically meaningful results complement the benefits seen in an identical phase III study and a previous phase IIb study,” said Richard B. Lipton, MD, Edwin S. Lowe Chair in Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, and colleagues. “Rimegepant may ultimately offer patients a novel approach for the acute treatment of migraine.”

Dr. Lipton and colleagues conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist rimegepant (75 mg oral tablet) with placebo in the acute treatment of migraine in adults.

SAN FRANCISCO—Although triptans are considered the gold standard for acute migraine therapy, only 37% of migraineurs had ever used a triptan and just 15.9% were current triptan users, according to the results of a study presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Aftab Alam, MBBS, MBA, from Medical Affairs at Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories in Princeton, New Jersey, and colleagues from the Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) study determined that while oral treatment was the most common route of administration, only 11.5% of their total sample (31.1% of ever triptan users and 40.4% of current triptan users) had ever used a non-oral formulation.

The MAST Study collected detailed information regarding patterns of medication use in a sample of patients with migraine. The objectives of the analysis were to understand past and current usage patterns for triptans by route of administration and the rates and reasons for discontinuation.

Study respondents were recruited from a nationwide online research panel. Stratified random sampling identified a representative cohort of individuals 18 and older. A validated migraine symptom screen based on modified ICHD-3 beta criteria identified those with migraine. Study inclusion required an average of at least one headache day per month over the previous three months. Qualified respondents provided sociodemographic data (age, gender, and race) as well as patterns of past and current medication use. For past triptan users, Dr. Alam and his MAST study collaborators assessed reasons for discontinuation from a pre-coded list of side effects and triptan sensation symptoms. Other responses were allowed and coded. The researchers examined descriptive results for each route of administration, but “the groups are not mutually exclusive,” Dr. Alam noted.

Triptan Usage Results

Among 15,133 respondents with migraine, the mean age was 43.1; 73% were women, and 81% were Caucasian. Median monthly headache frequency was 3.3 days per month. A total of 5,596 (37%) had ever used a triptan. Among this subgroup, 81.8% had used oral, 21.3% had used a nasal spray, and 19.0% had used injectable forms; 22.2% had used more than one route of administration. Among current triptan users (2,421, 15.9%), 84.7% use oral, 16.5% use nasal spray, and 8.1% use injectable; 9.3% currently use more than one route of administration. Discontinuation rates were highest for injectable triptans (81.5%), followed by nasal sprays (66.5%) and oral medications (55.2%).

Reasons for Discontinuation

The most common reason for discontinuation was perceived lack of efficacy (38.4% oral, 39.8% nasal spray, 25.7% injectable), followed by side effects (22.8% oral, 17% nasal spray, 20.6% injectable). The most commonly reported side effects were dizziness (37.4% oral, 29.4% nasal spray, 33.5% injectable) followed by nausea (30.7% oral, 32.4% nasal spray, 24.6% injectable) and fatigue (26.2% oral, 24.3% nasal spray, 21.2% injectable). One or more triptan sensation symptom was reported among 60.3% of injection users, 46.5% of oral users, and 39.7% of nasal spray users.

—Glenn S. Williams

Suggested Reading

Wells RE, Markowitz SY, Baron EP, et al. Identifying factors underlying discontinuation of triptans. Headache. 2014;54(2):278-289.

SAN FRANCISCO—Although triptans are considered the gold standard for acute migraine therapy, only 37% of migraineurs had ever used a triptan and just 15.9% were current triptan users, according to the results of a study presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Aftab Alam, MBBS, MBA, from Medical Affairs at Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories in Princeton, New Jersey, and colleagues from the Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) study determined that while oral treatment was the most common route of administration, only 11.5% of their total sample (31.1% of ever triptan users and 40.4% of current triptan users) had ever used a non-oral formulation.

The MAST Study collected detailed information regarding patterns of medication use in a sample of patients with migraine. The objectives of the analysis were to understand past and current usage patterns for triptans by route of administration and the rates and reasons for discontinuation.

Study respondents were recruited from a nationwide online research panel. Stratified random sampling identified a representative cohort of individuals 18 and older. A validated migraine symptom screen based on modified ICHD-3 beta criteria identified those with migraine. Study inclusion required an average of at least one headache day per month over the previous three months. Qualified respondents provided sociodemographic data (age, gender, and race) as well as patterns of past and current medication use. For past triptan users, Dr. Alam and his MAST study collaborators assessed reasons for discontinuation from a pre-coded list of side effects and triptan sensation symptoms. Other responses were allowed and coded. The researchers examined descriptive results for each route of administration, but “the groups are not mutually exclusive,” Dr. Alam noted.

Triptan Usage Results

Among 15,133 respondents with migraine, the mean age was 43.1; 73% were women, and 81% were Caucasian. Median monthly headache frequency was 3.3 days per month. A total of 5,596 (37%) had ever used a triptan. Among this subgroup, 81.8% had used oral, 21.3% had used a nasal spray, and 19.0% had used injectable forms; 22.2% had used more than one route of administration. Among current triptan users (2,421, 15.9%), 84.7% use oral, 16.5% use nasal spray, and 8.1% use injectable; 9.3% currently use more than one route of administration. Discontinuation rates were highest for injectable triptans (81.5%), followed by nasal sprays (66.5%) and oral medications (55.2%).

Reasons for Discontinuation

The most common reason for discontinuation was perceived lack of efficacy (38.4% oral, 39.8% nasal spray, 25.7% injectable), followed by side effects (22.8% oral, 17% nasal spray, 20.6% injectable). The most commonly reported side effects were dizziness (37.4% oral, 29.4% nasal spray, 33.5% injectable) followed by nausea (30.7% oral, 32.4% nasal spray, 24.6% injectable) and fatigue (26.2% oral, 24.3% nasal spray, 21.2% injectable). One or more triptan sensation symptom was reported among 60.3% of injection users, 46.5% of oral users, and 39.7% of nasal spray users.

—Glenn S. Williams

Suggested Reading

Wells RE, Markowitz SY, Baron EP, et al. Identifying factors underlying discontinuation of triptans. Headache. 2014;54(2):278-289.

SAN FRANCISCO—Although triptans are considered the gold standard for acute migraine therapy, only 37% of migraineurs had ever used a triptan and just 15.9% were current triptan users, according to the results of a study presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Aftab Alam, MBBS, MBA, from Medical Affairs at Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories in Princeton, New Jersey, and colleagues from the Migraine in America Symptoms and Treatment (MAST) study determined that while oral treatment was the most common route of administration, only 11.5% of their total sample (31.1% of ever triptan users and 40.4% of current triptan users) had ever used a non-oral formulation.

The MAST Study collected detailed information regarding patterns of medication use in a sample of patients with migraine. The objectives of the analysis were to understand past and current usage patterns for triptans by route of administration and the rates and reasons for discontinuation.

Study respondents were recruited from a nationwide online research panel. Stratified random sampling identified a representative cohort of individuals 18 and older. A validated migraine symptom screen based on modified ICHD-3 beta criteria identified those with migraine. Study inclusion required an average of at least one headache day per month over the previous three months. Qualified respondents provided sociodemographic data (age, gender, and race) as well as patterns of past and current medication use. For past triptan users, Dr. Alam and his MAST study collaborators assessed reasons for discontinuation from a pre-coded list of side effects and triptan sensation symptoms. Other responses were allowed and coded. The researchers examined descriptive results for each route of administration, but “the groups are not mutually exclusive,” Dr. Alam noted.

Triptan Usage Results

Among 15,133 respondents with migraine, the mean age was 43.1; 73% were women, and 81% were Caucasian. Median monthly headache frequency was 3.3 days per month. A total of 5,596 (37%) had ever used a triptan. Among this subgroup, 81.8% had used oral, 21.3% had used a nasal spray, and 19.0% had used injectable forms; 22.2% had used more than one route of administration. Among current triptan users (2,421, 15.9%), 84.7% use oral, 16.5% use nasal spray, and 8.1% use injectable; 9.3% currently use more than one route of administration. Discontinuation rates were highest for injectable triptans (81.5%), followed by nasal sprays (66.5%) and oral medications (55.2%).

Reasons for Discontinuation

The most common reason for discontinuation was perceived lack of efficacy (38.4% oral, 39.8% nasal spray, 25.7% injectable), followed by side effects (22.8% oral, 17% nasal spray, 20.6% injectable). The most commonly reported side effects were dizziness (37.4% oral, 29.4% nasal spray, 33.5% injectable) followed by nausea (30.7% oral, 32.4% nasal spray, 24.6% injectable) and fatigue (26.2% oral, 24.3% nasal spray, 21.2% injectable). One or more triptan sensation symptom was reported among 60.3% of injection users, 46.5% of oral users, and 39.7% of nasal spray users.

—Glenn S. Williams

Suggested Reading

Wells RE, Markowitz SY, Baron EP, et al. Identifying factors underlying discontinuation of triptans. Headache. 2014;54(2):278-289.