The revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) has led to more diagnoses in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), but a new study of the criteria has suggested that they may lead to a number of false positive MS diagnoses among patients with a less severe disease state.

solitude72/iStockphoto

Patients were assessed using both the 2010 and 2017 McDonald criteria for MS, and results were measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values, and accuracy at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-up. “The most important addition is that the new criteria allow MS diagnosis when the MRI scan meets criteria for DIS and unique oligoclonal bands (OCB) are present in [cerebrospinal fluid], even in absence of DIT on the MRI scan,” the researchers wrote. “The other major difference is that not only asymptomatic but also symptomatic lesions can be used to demonstrate DIS and DIT on MRI. Furthermore, cortical lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space.”

The researchers found that 124 patients met 2010 DIS criteria (54%) and that 74 patients (60%) went on to develop clinically definite MS, while 149 patients (65%) met 2017 DIS criteria, and 89 patients (60%) went on to clinically definite MS. There were 46 patients (26%) who met 2010 DIT criteria, and 33 of those patients (72%) were diagnosed with clinically definite MS; 126 patients (70%) met 2017 DIT criteria, and 76 of those patients (60%) had clinically definite MS. The sensitivity for the 2010 criteria was 36% (95% confidence interval, 27%-47%)versus 68% for the 2017 criteria (95% CI, 57%-77%; P less than .001). However, specificity for the 2017 criteria was lower (61%; 95% CI, 50%-71%) when compared with the 2010 criteria (85%; 95% CI, 76%-92%; P less than .001). Researchers found more baseline MS diagnoses with the 2017 criteria than with the 2010 criteria, but they noted that 14 of 22 patients (64%) under the 2010 criteria and 26 of 48 patients (54%) under the 2017 criteria with MS had a second attack within 5 years.

The study was supported by the Dutch Multiple Sclerosis Research Foundation. One or more authors received compensation from Teva, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen, and Novartis in the form of honoraria, for advisory board membership, as travel grants, or for participation in trials.

SOURCE: van der Vuurst de Vries RM, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2160.

The revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) has led to more diagnoses in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), but a new study of the criteria has suggested that they may lead to a number of false positive MS diagnoses among patients with a less severe disease state.

solitude72/iStockphoto

Patients were assessed using both the 2010 and 2017 McDonald criteria for MS, and results were measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values, and accuracy at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-up. “The most important addition is that the new criteria allow MS diagnosis when the MRI scan meets criteria for DIS and unique oligoclonal bands (OCB) are present in [cerebrospinal fluid], even in absence of DIT on the MRI scan,” the researchers wrote. “The other major difference is that not only asymptomatic but also symptomatic lesions can be used to demonstrate DIS and DIT on MRI. Furthermore, cortical lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space.”

The researchers found that 124 patients met 2010 DIS criteria (54%) and that 74 patients (60%) went on to develop clinically definite MS, while 149 patients (65%) met 2017 DIS criteria, and 89 patients (60%) went on to clinically definite MS. There were 46 patients (26%) who met 2010 DIT criteria, and 33 of those patients (72%) were diagnosed with clinically definite MS; 126 patients (70%) met 2017 DIT criteria, and 76 of those patients (60%) had clinically definite MS. The sensitivity for the 2010 criteria was 36% (95% confidence interval, 27%-47%)versus 68% for the 2017 criteria (95% CI, 57%-77%; P less than .001). However, specificity for the 2017 criteria was lower (61%; 95% CI, 50%-71%) when compared with the 2010 criteria (85%; 95% CI, 76%-92%; P less than .001). Researchers found more baseline MS diagnoses with the 2017 criteria than with the 2010 criteria, but they noted that 14 of 22 patients (64%) under the 2010 criteria and 26 of 48 patients (54%) under the 2017 criteria with MS had a second attack within 5 years.

The study was supported by the Dutch Multiple Sclerosis Research Foundation. One or more authors received compensation from Teva, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen, and Novartis in the form of honoraria, for advisory board membership, as travel grants, or for participation in trials.

SOURCE: van der Vuurst de Vries RM, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2160.

The revised McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) has led to more diagnoses in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), but a new study of the criteria has suggested that they may lead to a number of false positive MS diagnoses among patients with a less severe disease state.

solitude72/iStockphoto

Patients were assessed using both the 2010 and 2017 McDonald criteria for MS, and results were measured using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values, and accuracy at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-up. “The most important addition is that the new criteria allow MS diagnosis when the MRI scan meets criteria for DIS and unique oligoclonal bands (OCB) are present in [cerebrospinal fluid], even in absence of DIT on the MRI scan,” the researchers wrote. “The other major difference is that not only asymptomatic but also symptomatic lesions can be used to demonstrate DIS and DIT on MRI. Furthermore, cortical lesions can be used to demonstrate dissemination in space.”

The researchers found that 124 patients met 2010 DIS criteria (54%) and that 74 patients (60%) went on to develop clinically definite MS, while 149 patients (65%) met 2017 DIS criteria, and 89 patients (60%) went on to clinically definite MS. There were 46 patients (26%) who met 2010 DIT criteria, and 33 of those patients (72%) were diagnosed with clinically definite MS; 126 patients (70%) met 2017 DIT criteria, and 76 of those patients (60%) had clinically definite MS. The sensitivity for the 2010 criteria was 36% (95% confidence interval, 27%-47%)versus 68% for the 2017 criteria (95% CI, 57%-77%; P less than .001). However, specificity for the 2017 criteria was lower (61%; 95% CI, 50%-71%) when compared with the 2010 criteria (85%; 95% CI, 76%-92%; P less than .001). Researchers found more baseline MS diagnoses with the 2017 criteria than with the 2010 criteria, but they noted that 14 of 22 patients (64%) under the 2010 criteria and 26 of 48 patients (54%) under the 2017 criteria with MS had a second attack within 5 years.

The study was supported by the Dutch Multiple Sclerosis Research Foundation. One or more authors received compensation from Teva, Merck, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Biogen, and Novartis in the form of honoraria, for advisory board membership, as travel grants, or for participation in trials.

SOURCE: van der Vuurst de Vries RM, et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2160.

SAN FRANCISCO—Among patients with episodic cluster headache, galcanezumab significantly reduced weekly attack frequency, according to the results of a phase III trial presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Results of an eight-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial showed that galcanezumab (300 mg SC) significantly reduced the weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three, which was the study’s primary end point, and resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients achieving a 50% or greater reduction in their weekly cluster headache attack frequency at week three.

James M. Martinez, MD, a medical fellow at Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana, and study collaborators sought to determine if galcanezumab (aka LY2951742), a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is efficacious as a preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache.

A phase III study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in individuals with episodic cluster headache, as defined by ICHD-3 beta criteria. This study comprised a screening period; a prospective baseline period; an eight-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period; and a four-month posttreatment washout period.

In the double-blind treatment period, participants were randomized 1:1 to galcanezumab 300 mg SC (n = 49) or placebo (n = 57) once monthly for two months. The primary end point was the overall mean change from baseline in weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three. The key secondary end point was the proportion of participants achieving a response, defined as a reduction from baseline of 50% or greater in the weekly cluster headache attack frequency at week three. Other secondary end points included proportion of participants very much or much better based on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at weeks four and eight.

Baseline demographics of the galcanezumab and placebo groups were similar. Mean age was 47 and 45, respectively; 84% and 82%, respectively, were male. The mean number of weekly cluster headache attacks in the baseline period was 17.8 for the galcanezumab group and 17.3 for the placebo group. Overall, four participants (8%) in the galcanezumab treatment group discontinued therapy during the double-blind period versus 12 (21%) in the placebo group. In the placebo group, eight participants (14%) discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy versus one (2%) in the galcanezumab group. The mean change in weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three was –8.7 for galcanezumab versus –5.2 for placebo (difference between treatment groups in mean change, –3.5). The proportion of participants achieving a 50% or greater reduction in weekly cluster headache attack frequency was 76% for galcanezumab versus 57% for placebo. The proportion of participants very much or much better based on PGI-I was significantly greater with galcanezumab versus placebo at week four (73% vs 46%) but not at week eight (72% vs 66%). There were no clinically meaningful differences between treatment groups on tolerability or safety parameters except for a statistically significantly greater incidence of injection site pain with galcanezumab versus placebo (8.2% vs 0%), which was similar to the safety profile seen previously in patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

—Glenn S. Williams

SAN FRANCISCO—Among patients with episodic cluster headache, galcanezumab significantly reduced weekly attack frequency, according to the results of a phase III trial presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Results of an eight-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial showed that galcanezumab (300 mg SC) significantly reduced the weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three, which was the study’s primary end point, and resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients achieving a 50% or greater reduction in their weekly cluster headache attack frequency at week three.

James M. Martinez, MD, a medical fellow at Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana, and study collaborators sought to determine if galcanezumab (aka LY2951742), a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is efficacious as a preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache.

A phase III study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in individuals with episodic cluster headache, as defined by ICHD-3 beta criteria. This study comprised a screening period; a prospective baseline period; an eight-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period; and a four-month posttreatment washout period.

In the double-blind treatment period, participants were randomized 1:1 to galcanezumab 300 mg SC (n = 49) or placebo (n = 57) once monthly for two months. The primary end point was the overall mean change from baseline in weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three. The key secondary end point was the proportion of participants achieving a response, defined as a reduction from baseline of 50% or greater in the weekly cluster headache attack frequency at week three. Other secondary end points included proportion of participants very much or much better based on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at weeks four and eight.

Baseline demographics of the galcanezumab and placebo groups were similar. Mean age was 47 and 45, respectively; 84% and 82%, respectively, were male. The mean number of weekly cluster headache attacks in the baseline period was 17.8 for the galcanezumab group and 17.3 for the placebo group. Overall, four participants (8%) in the galcanezumab treatment group discontinued therapy during the double-blind period versus 12 (21%) in the placebo group. In the placebo group, eight participants (14%) discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy versus one (2%) in the galcanezumab group. The mean change in weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three was –8.7 for galcanezumab versus –5.2 for placebo (difference between treatment groups in mean change, –3.5). The proportion of participants achieving a 50% or greater reduction in weekly cluster headache attack frequency was 76% for galcanezumab versus 57% for placebo. The proportion of participants very much or much better based on PGI-I was significantly greater with galcanezumab versus placebo at week four (73% vs 46%) but not at week eight (72% vs 66%). There were no clinically meaningful differences between treatment groups on tolerability or safety parameters except for a statistically significantly greater incidence of injection site pain with galcanezumab versus placebo (8.2% vs 0%), which was similar to the safety profile seen previously in patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

—Glenn S. Williams

SAN FRANCISCO—Among patients with episodic cluster headache, galcanezumab significantly reduced weekly attack frequency, according to the results of a phase III trial presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Results of an eight-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial showed that galcanezumab (300 mg SC) significantly reduced the weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three, which was the study’s primary end point, and resulted in a significantly greater percentage of patients achieving a 50% or greater reduction in their weekly cluster headache attack frequency at week three.

James M. Martinez, MD, a medical fellow at Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana, and study collaborators sought to determine if galcanezumab (aka LY2951742), a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), is efficacious as a preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache.

A phase III study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in individuals with episodic cluster headache, as defined by ICHD-3 beta criteria. This study comprised a screening period; a prospective baseline period; an eight-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period; and a four-month posttreatment washout period.

In the double-blind treatment period, participants were randomized 1:1 to galcanezumab 300 mg SC (n = 49) or placebo (n = 57) once monthly for two months. The primary end point was the overall mean change from baseline in weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three. The key secondary end point was the proportion of participants achieving a response, defined as a reduction from baseline of 50% or greater in the weekly cluster headache attack frequency at week three. Other secondary end points included proportion of participants very much or much better based on Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) at weeks four and eight.

Baseline demographics of the galcanezumab and placebo groups were similar. Mean age was 47 and 45, respectively; 84% and 82%, respectively, were male. The mean number of weekly cluster headache attacks in the baseline period was 17.8 for the galcanezumab group and 17.3 for the placebo group. Overall, four participants (8%) in the galcanezumab treatment group discontinued therapy during the double-blind period versus 12 (21%) in the placebo group. In the placebo group, eight participants (14%) discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy versus one (2%) in the galcanezumab group. The mean change in weekly cluster headache attack frequency across weeks one to three was –8.7 for galcanezumab versus –5.2 for placebo (difference between treatment groups in mean change, –3.5). The proportion of participants achieving a 50% or greater reduction in weekly cluster headache attack frequency was 76% for galcanezumab versus 57% for placebo. The proportion of participants very much or much better based on PGI-I was significantly greater with galcanezumab versus placebo at week four (73% vs 46%) but not at week eight (72% vs 66%). There were no clinically meaningful differences between treatment groups on tolerability or safety parameters except for a statistically significantly greater incidence of injection site pain with galcanezumab versus placebo (8.2% vs 0%), which was similar to the safety profile seen previously in patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

—Glenn S. Williams

LOS ANGELES—Aspirin may be an effective pretreatment for exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

“Exercise in MS we know to be beneficial on multiple levels,” said Victoria M. Leavitt, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neuropsychology at Columbia University Medical Center in New York. “In addition to physical benefits like gait, balance, and improved cardiovascular fitness, exercise is also associated with improved mood, reduced fatigue, and improved memory performance. The challenge, of course, is that exercise is only beneficial if people actually do it.”

—Jake Remaly

Suggested Reading

Leavitt VM, Blanchard AR, Guo CY, et al. Aspirin is an effective pretreatment for exercise in multiple sclerosis: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial. Mult Scler. 2017 Oct 27 [Epub ahead of print].

Wingerchuk DM, Benarroch EE, O’Brien PC, et al. A randomized controlled crossover trial of aspirin for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2005;64(7):1267-1269.

LOS ANGELES—Aspirin may be an effective pretreatment for exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

“Exercise in MS we know to be beneficial on multiple levels,” said Victoria M. Leavitt, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neuropsychology at Columbia University Medical Center in New York. “In addition to physical benefits like gait, balance, and improved cardiovascular fitness, exercise is also associated with improved mood, reduced fatigue, and improved memory performance. The challenge, of course, is that exercise is only beneficial if people actually do it.”

—Jake Remaly

Suggested Reading

Leavitt VM, Blanchard AR, Guo CY, et al. Aspirin is an effective pretreatment for exercise in multiple sclerosis: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial. Mult Scler. 2017 Oct 27 [Epub ahead of print].

Wingerchuk DM, Benarroch EE, O’Brien PC, et al. A randomized controlled crossover trial of aspirin for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2005;64(7):1267-1269.

LOS ANGELES—Aspirin may be an effective pretreatment for exercise in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), according to a study described at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

“Exercise in MS we know to be beneficial on multiple levels,” said Victoria M. Leavitt, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neuropsychology at Columbia University Medical Center in New York. “In addition to physical benefits like gait, balance, and improved cardiovascular fitness, exercise is also associated with improved mood, reduced fatigue, and improved memory performance. The challenge, of course, is that exercise is only beneficial if people actually do it.”

—Jake Remaly

Suggested Reading

Leavitt VM, Blanchard AR, Guo CY, et al. Aspirin is an effective pretreatment for exercise in multiple sclerosis: a double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial. Mult Scler. 2017 Oct 27 [Epub ahead of print].

Wingerchuk DM, Benarroch EE, O’Brien PC, et al. A randomized controlled crossover trial of aspirin for fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2005;64(7):1267-1269.

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC), a recently identified, rare type of renal tumor, appears to have an indolent course with low risk of either local invasion or distant metastasis, results of a small retrospective study suggest.

Among 25 patients with CCPRCC followed for as long as 119 months, there were no cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis, reported Wei-Jen Chen, MD, of Tapei (Taiwan) Veterans General Hospital, and colleagues.

“Based on our findings, CCPRCC has an indolent behavior even if the patients are immunosuppressed or if they receive less invasive therapy. Microscopically, CCPRCC is considered to be a tumor of low malignant potential, as all tumors in our series were of low nuclear grade,” they wrote in a study published online in the Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.

“Whenever the diagnosis is made in a high grade renal tumor, it should be carefully re-confirmed by either cytogenetic or molecular genetic methods,” the authors reported.

CCPRCC was newly recognized as a distinct renal malignancy in the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. The classification describes CCPRCC as “a renal epithelial neoplasm composed of low-grade clear epithelial cells arranged in tubules and papillae with a predominantly linear nuclear alignment away from the basement membrane.”

Although rare, these tumors account for up to 5% of all resected renal tumors, and arise sporadically in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, the classification states, adding that “according to current knowledge, these tumors have indolent behavior.”

To see if they could verify that last statement, Dr. Chen and associates collected data on all patients diagnosed at their institution with CCPRCC from January 2008 through September 2016.

They identified a total of 25 patients (11 men and 14 women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 62.8 years. Of this group, three patients with poor general condition underwent cryotherapy after a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of CCPRCC.

All of the remaining 22 patients underwent surgical resection. Of this group, four had ESRD; three of these patients had received a kidney transplant prior to diagnosis of CCPRCC in the native kidneys, and one had three tumors over both kidneys.

“Three patients had other types of synchronous RCC; one with acquired cystic kidney disease-associated RCC, and the others with ccRCC. All CCPRCCs were localized and low grade (pT1a- pT1b, Fuhrman grade 2), and all of the patients are currently alive with no evidence of disease,” the investigators wrote.

Mean follow-up was 49.7 months (range 12 to 119 months).

One additional patient who was not included in the series was initially diagnosed with CCPRCC with lung metastasis. This patient, who died 3 years and 8 months after cytoreductive nephrectomy, had a clinical course distinct from that of all the other patients, leading the investigators to reexamine his kidney specimen with whole-exome sequencing. The sequencing led to a revision of the diagnosis to clear cell RCC.

The investigators noted that clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, and translocation RCC are three RCC subtypes that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CCPRCC.

SOURCE: Chen W-J et al. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2018 July 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.04.005.

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC), a recently identified, rare type of renal tumor, appears to have an indolent course with low risk of either local invasion or distant metastasis, results of a small retrospective study suggest.

Among 25 patients with CCPRCC followed for as long as 119 months, there were no cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis, reported Wei-Jen Chen, MD, of Tapei (Taiwan) Veterans General Hospital, and colleagues.

“Based on our findings, CCPRCC has an indolent behavior even if the patients are immunosuppressed or if they receive less invasive therapy. Microscopically, CCPRCC is considered to be a tumor of low malignant potential, as all tumors in our series were of low nuclear grade,” they wrote in a study published online in the Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.

“Whenever the diagnosis is made in a high grade renal tumor, it should be carefully re-confirmed by either cytogenetic or molecular genetic methods,” the authors reported.

CCPRCC was newly recognized as a distinct renal malignancy in the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. The classification describes CCPRCC as “a renal epithelial neoplasm composed of low-grade clear epithelial cells arranged in tubules and papillae with a predominantly linear nuclear alignment away from the basement membrane.”

Although rare, these tumors account for up to 5% of all resected renal tumors, and arise sporadically in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, the classification states, adding that “according to current knowledge, these tumors have indolent behavior.”

To see if they could verify that last statement, Dr. Chen and associates collected data on all patients diagnosed at their institution with CCPRCC from January 2008 through September 2016.

They identified a total of 25 patients (11 men and 14 women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 62.8 years. Of this group, three patients with poor general condition underwent cryotherapy after a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of CCPRCC.

All of the remaining 22 patients underwent surgical resection. Of this group, four had ESRD; three of these patients had received a kidney transplant prior to diagnosis of CCPRCC in the native kidneys, and one had three tumors over both kidneys.

“Three patients had other types of synchronous RCC; one with acquired cystic kidney disease-associated RCC, and the others with ccRCC. All CCPRCCs were localized and low grade (pT1a- pT1b, Fuhrman grade 2), and all of the patients are currently alive with no evidence of disease,” the investigators wrote.

Mean follow-up was 49.7 months (range 12 to 119 months).

One additional patient who was not included in the series was initially diagnosed with CCPRCC with lung metastasis. This patient, who died 3 years and 8 months after cytoreductive nephrectomy, had a clinical course distinct from that of all the other patients, leading the investigators to reexamine his kidney specimen with whole-exome sequencing. The sequencing led to a revision of the diagnosis to clear cell RCC.

The investigators noted that clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, and translocation RCC are three RCC subtypes that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CCPRCC.

SOURCE: Chen W-J et al. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2018 July 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.04.005.

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC), a recently identified, rare type of renal tumor, appears to have an indolent course with low risk of either local invasion or distant metastasis, results of a small retrospective study suggest.

Among 25 patients with CCPRCC followed for as long as 119 months, there were no cases of local recurrence or distant metastasis, reported Wei-Jen Chen, MD, of Tapei (Taiwan) Veterans General Hospital, and colleagues.

“Based on our findings, CCPRCC has an indolent behavior even if the patients are immunosuppressed or if they receive less invasive therapy. Microscopically, CCPRCC is considered to be a tumor of low malignant potential, as all tumors in our series were of low nuclear grade,” they wrote in a study published online in the Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.

“Whenever the diagnosis is made in a high grade renal tumor, it should be carefully re-confirmed by either cytogenetic or molecular genetic methods,” the authors reported.

CCPRCC was newly recognized as a distinct renal malignancy in the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. The classification describes CCPRCC as “a renal epithelial neoplasm composed of low-grade clear epithelial cells arranged in tubules and papillae with a predominantly linear nuclear alignment away from the basement membrane.”

Although rare, these tumors account for up to 5% of all resected renal tumors, and arise sporadically in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome, the classification states, adding that “according to current knowledge, these tumors have indolent behavior.”

To see if they could verify that last statement, Dr. Chen and associates collected data on all patients diagnosed at their institution with CCPRCC from January 2008 through September 2016.

They identified a total of 25 patients (11 men and 14 women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 62.8 years. Of this group, three patients with poor general condition underwent cryotherapy after a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of CCPRCC.

All of the remaining 22 patients underwent surgical resection. Of this group, four had ESRD; three of these patients had received a kidney transplant prior to diagnosis of CCPRCC in the native kidneys, and one had three tumors over both kidneys.

“Three patients had other types of synchronous RCC; one with acquired cystic kidney disease-associated RCC, and the others with ccRCC. All CCPRCCs were localized and low grade (pT1a- pT1b, Fuhrman grade 2), and all of the patients are currently alive with no evidence of disease,” the investigators wrote.

Mean follow-up was 49.7 months (range 12 to 119 months).

One additional patient who was not included in the series was initially diagnosed with CCPRCC with lung metastasis. This patient, who died 3 years and 8 months after cytoreductive nephrectomy, had a clinical course distinct from that of all the other patients, leading the investigators to reexamine his kidney specimen with whole-exome sequencing. The sequencing led to a revision of the diagnosis to clear cell RCC.

The investigators noted that clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, and translocation RCC are three RCC subtypes that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of CCPRCC.

SOURCE: Chen W-J et al. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2018 July 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2018.04.005.

Superimposed relapses were associated with a significantly reduced risk of disability progression in a longitudinal, prospective cohort study of 1,419 multiple sclerosis patients (MS) of the progressive-onset type.

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

SOURCE: Hughes J et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2109.

Superimposed relapses were associated with a significantly reduced risk of disability progression in a longitudinal, prospective cohort study of 1,419 multiple sclerosis patients (MS) of the progressive-onset type.

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

SOURCE: Hughes J et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2109.

Superimposed relapses were associated with a significantly reduced risk of disability progression in a longitudinal, prospective cohort study of 1,419 multiple sclerosis patients (MS) of the progressive-onset type.

HUNG KUO CHUN/Thinkstock

SOURCE: Hughes J et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Aug 6. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2109.

The Society for Vascular Surgery needs members to participate in guideline writing groups on three topics: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Trauma and Genetic Aneurysms/Dissections. SVS welcomes applicants with expertise and experience in diverse practice settings. Visit here for more information and the survey/application forms for each guideline. Completed forms are due Aug. 15.

The Society for Vascular Surgery needs members to participate in guideline writing groups on three topics: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Trauma and Genetic Aneurysms/Dissections. SVS welcomes applicants with expertise and experience in diverse practice settings. Visit here for more information and the survey/application forms for each guideline. Completed forms are due Aug. 15.

The Society for Vascular Surgery needs members to participate in guideline writing groups on three topics: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, Trauma and Genetic Aneurysms/Dissections. SVS welcomes applicants with expertise and experience in diverse practice settings. Visit here for more information and the survey/application forms for each guideline. Completed forms are due Aug. 15.

Do you have an idea for an informative session at the 2019 Vascular Annual Meeting? The Society for Vascular Surgery is seeking proposals for invited sessions — postgraduate courses; breakfast, concurrent or small-group sessions; and/or Tips and Tricks and Ask the Experts sessions — for next year’s meeting. Suggestions are due by Aug. 27. See more information and find the submission form here. The 2019 VAM will be June 12-15 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., just outside Washington, D.C.

Do you have an idea for an informative session at the 2019 Vascular Annual Meeting? The Society for Vascular Surgery is seeking proposals for invited sessions — postgraduate courses; breakfast, concurrent or small-group sessions; and/or Tips and Tricks and Ask the Experts sessions — for next year’s meeting. Suggestions are due by Aug. 27. See more information and find the submission form here. The 2019 VAM will be June 12-15 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., just outside Washington, D.C.

Do you have an idea for an informative session at the 2019 Vascular Annual Meeting? The Society for Vascular Surgery is seeking proposals for invited sessions — postgraduate courses; breakfast, concurrent or small-group sessions; and/or Tips and Tricks and Ask the Experts sessions — for next year’s meeting. Suggestions are due by Aug. 27. See more information and find the submission form here. The 2019 VAM will be June 12-15 at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center in National Harbor, Md., just outside Washington, D.C.

Having health insurance can mean the difference between life and death for patients with follicular lymphoma, suggest results of a study showing that patients with private health insurance had nearly twofold better survival outcomes than patients without insurance or those who were covered by Medicare or Medicaid.

Thinkstock

A review of records on more than 43,000 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in a national cancer registry showed that, compared with patients under age 65 with private insurance, the hazard ratios (HR) for death among patients in the same age bracket with either no insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare were, respectively, 1.96, 1.83, and 1.96 (P less than .0001 for each comparison).

“Our study finds that insurance status contributes to survival disparities in FL. Future studies on outcomes in FL should include insurance status as an important predictor,” Christopher R. Flowers, MD, of Emory University in Atlanta and his colleagues wrote in Blood.

“Further research on prognosis for FL should examine the impact of public policy, such as the passage of the [Affordable Care Act], on FL outcomes, as well as examine other factors that influence access to care, such as individual-level socioeconomic status, regular primary care visits, access to prescription medications, and care affordability,” they added.

The investigators noted that earlier research found that patients with Medicaid or no insurance were more likely than privately-insured patients to be diagnosed with cancers at advanced stages, and that some patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas have been shown to have insurance-related disparities in treatments and outcomes.

To see whether the same could be true for patients with indolent-histology lymphomas such as FL, they extracted data from the National Cancer Database, a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry sponsored jointly by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society.

They identified a total of 43,648 patients aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with FL from 2004 through 2014. They looked at both patients 18-64 years and those 65 years and older to account for changes in insurance with Medicare eligibility.

Overall survival among patients younger than age 65 was significantly worse for patients with public insurance (Medicaid or Medicare) or no insurance in Cox proportional hazard models controlling for available data on sociodemographic factors and prognostic indicators.

However, compared with patients aged 65 and older with private insurance, only patients with Medicare as their sole source of insurance had significantly worse overall survival (HR, 1.28; P less than .0001).

Patients who were uninsured or had Medicaid were more likely than others to have lower socioeconomic status, present with advanced-stage disease, have systemic symptoms, and have multiple comorbidities that persisted after controlling for known sociodemographic and prognostic factors.

The investigators found that, among patients under age 65, those with a comorbidity score of 1 had an HR for death of 1.71, compared with patients with no comorbidities, and that patients with a score of 2 or greater had a HR of 3.1 (P less than .0001 for each comparison).

“The findings of the study indicate that improving access to affordable, quality health care may reduce disparities in survival for those currently lacking coverage,” the investigators wrote.

The study was supported by Emory University, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Dr. Flowers reported financial relationships with AbbVie, Spectrum, Celgene, and several other companies. The other authors reported having nothing to disclose.

SOURCE: Goldstein JS et al. Blood. 2018 Jul 24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-839035.

Having health insurance can mean the difference between life and death for patients with follicular lymphoma, suggest results of a study showing that patients with private health insurance had nearly twofold better survival outcomes than patients without insurance or those who were covered by Medicare or Medicaid.

Thinkstock

A review of records on more than 43,000 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in a national cancer registry showed that, compared with patients under age 65 with private insurance, the hazard ratios (HR) for death among patients in the same age bracket with either no insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare were, respectively, 1.96, 1.83, and 1.96 (P less than .0001 for each comparison).

“Our study finds that insurance status contributes to survival disparities in FL. Future studies on outcomes in FL should include insurance status as an important predictor,” Christopher R. Flowers, MD, of Emory University in Atlanta and his colleagues wrote in Blood.

“Further research on prognosis for FL should examine the impact of public policy, such as the passage of the [Affordable Care Act], on FL outcomes, as well as examine other factors that influence access to care, such as individual-level socioeconomic status, regular primary care visits, access to prescription medications, and care affordability,” they added.

The investigators noted that earlier research found that patients with Medicaid or no insurance were more likely than privately-insured patients to be diagnosed with cancers at advanced stages, and that some patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas have been shown to have insurance-related disparities in treatments and outcomes.

To see whether the same could be true for patients with indolent-histology lymphomas such as FL, they extracted data from the National Cancer Database, a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry sponsored jointly by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society.

They identified a total of 43,648 patients aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with FL from 2004 through 2014. They looked at both patients 18-64 years and those 65 years and older to account for changes in insurance with Medicare eligibility.

Overall survival among patients younger than age 65 was significantly worse for patients with public insurance (Medicaid or Medicare) or no insurance in Cox proportional hazard models controlling for available data on sociodemographic factors and prognostic indicators.

However, compared with patients aged 65 and older with private insurance, only patients with Medicare as their sole source of insurance had significantly worse overall survival (HR, 1.28; P less than .0001).

Patients who were uninsured or had Medicaid were more likely than others to have lower socioeconomic status, present with advanced-stage disease, have systemic symptoms, and have multiple comorbidities that persisted after controlling for known sociodemographic and prognostic factors.

The investigators found that, among patients under age 65, those with a comorbidity score of 1 had an HR for death of 1.71, compared with patients with no comorbidities, and that patients with a score of 2 or greater had a HR of 3.1 (P less than .0001 for each comparison).

“The findings of the study indicate that improving access to affordable, quality health care may reduce disparities in survival for those currently lacking coverage,” the investigators wrote.

The study was supported by Emory University, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Dr. Flowers reported financial relationships with AbbVie, Spectrum, Celgene, and several other companies. The other authors reported having nothing to disclose.

SOURCE: Goldstein JS et al. Blood. 2018 Jul 24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-839035.

Having health insurance can mean the difference between life and death for patients with follicular lymphoma, suggest results of a study showing that patients with private health insurance had nearly twofold better survival outcomes than patients without insurance or those who were covered by Medicare or Medicaid.

Thinkstock

A review of records on more than 43,000 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) in a national cancer registry showed that, compared with patients under age 65 with private insurance, the hazard ratios (HR) for death among patients in the same age bracket with either no insurance, Medicaid, or Medicare were, respectively, 1.96, 1.83, and 1.96 (P less than .0001 for each comparison).

“Our study finds that insurance status contributes to survival disparities in FL. Future studies on outcomes in FL should include insurance status as an important predictor,” Christopher R. Flowers, MD, of Emory University in Atlanta and his colleagues wrote in Blood.

“Further research on prognosis for FL should examine the impact of public policy, such as the passage of the [Affordable Care Act], on FL outcomes, as well as examine other factors that influence access to care, such as individual-level socioeconomic status, regular primary care visits, access to prescription medications, and care affordability,” they added.

The investigators noted that earlier research found that patients with Medicaid or no insurance were more likely than privately-insured patients to be diagnosed with cancers at advanced stages, and that some patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas have been shown to have insurance-related disparities in treatments and outcomes.

To see whether the same could be true for patients with indolent-histology lymphomas such as FL, they extracted data from the National Cancer Database, a nationwide hospital-based cancer registry sponsored jointly by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society.

They identified a total of 43,648 patients aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with FL from 2004 through 2014. They looked at both patients 18-64 years and those 65 years and older to account for changes in insurance with Medicare eligibility.

Overall survival among patients younger than age 65 was significantly worse for patients with public insurance (Medicaid or Medicare) or no insurance in Cox proportional hazard models controlling for available data on sociodemographic factors and prognostic indicators.

However, compared with patients aged 65 and older with private insurance, only patients with Medicare as their sole source of insurance had significantly worse overall survival (HR, 1.28; P less than .0001).

Patients who were uninsured or had Medicaid were more likely than others to have lower socioeconomic status, present with advanced-stage disease, have systemic symptoms, and have multiple comorbidities that persisted after controlling for known sociodemographic and prognostic factors.

The investigators found that, among patients under age 65, those with a comorbidity score of 1 had an HR for death of 1.71, compared with patients with no comorbidities, and that patients with a score of 2 or greater had a HR of 3.1 (P less than .0001 for each comparison).

“The findings of the study indicate that improving access to affordable, quality health care may reduce disparities in survival for those currently lacking coverage,” the investigators wrote.

The study was supported by Emory University, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Dr. Flowers reported financial relationships with AbbVie, Spectrum, Celgene, and several other companies. The other authors reported having nothing to disclose.

SOURCE: Goldstein JS et al. Blood. 2018 Jul 24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-839035.

Case Presentation. A 64-year-old US Army veteran with a history of colorectal cancer, melanoma, and fibrinolytic presented with dyspnea to VA Boston Healthcare System (VABHS). Seven years prior to the current presentation, at the time of her diagnosis of colorectal cancer, the patient was found to be HIV negative but to have a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test. She was treated with isoniazid (INH) therapy for 9 months. Sputum cultures collected prior to initiation of therapy grew Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in 1 of 3 samples, with these results reported several months after initiation of therapy. She was a never smoker with no known travel or exposure. At the time of the current presentation, her medications included bupropion, levothyroxine, capsaicin, cyclobenzaprine, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen.

►Lakshmana Swamy, MD, Chief Medical Resident, VABHS and Boston Medical Center. Dr. Monach, this patient is on a variety of pain medications and has a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. This diagnosis often frustrates doctors and patients alike. Can you tell us about fibromyalgia from the rheumatologist’s perspective and what you think of her current treatment regimen?

►Paul A. Monach, MD, PhD, Chief, Section of Rheumatology, VABHS and Associate Professor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine. Fibromyalgia is a syndrome of chronic widespread pain without known pathology in the musculoskeletal system. It is thought to be caused by chronic dysfunction of pain-processing pathways in the central nervous system (CNS). It is often accompanied by other somatic symptoms such as chronic fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, and bladder pain. It is a common condition, affecting up to 5% of otherwise healthy women. It is particularly common in persons with chronic nonrestorative sleep or posttraumatic stress disorder from a wide range of causes. However, it also is more common in persons with autoimmune inflammatory diseases, such as lupus, Sjögren syndrome, or rheumatoid arthritis. Concern for one of these diseases is the main reason to consider referring a patient for evaluation by a rheumatologist. Often rheumatologists participate in the management of fibromyalgia. A patient should be given appropriate expectations by the referring physician.

Effectiveness of treatment varies widely among patients. Nonpharmacologic approaches such as aerobic exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and tai chi have support from clinical trials, and yoga and aquatherapy also are widely used.^1,2 The classes of drugs used are the same as for neuropathic pain: tricyclics, including cyclobenzaprine; serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); and gabapentinoids. In contrast, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are ineffective unless there is a superimposed mechanical or inflammatory cause in the periphery. The key point is that continuation of any treatment should be based entirely on the patient’s own assessment of benefit.

►Dr. Swamy. Seven years later, the patient returned to her primary care provider, reporting increased dyspnea on exertion as well as significant fatigue. She was referred to the pulmonary department and had repeat computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, which indicated persistent right middle lobe (RML) bronchiectasis. She then underwent bronchoscopy with a subsequent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture growing MAC. Dr. Fine, please interpret the baseline and follow-up CT scans and help us understand the significance of the MAC on sputum and BAL cultures.

►Alan Fine, MD, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, VABHS and Professor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine. Prior to this presentation, the patient had a pleural-based area of fibrosis with possible associated RML bronchiectasis. This appears to be a postinflammatory process without classic features of malignant or metastatic disease. She then had a sputum, which grew MAC in only 1 of 3 samples and in liquid media only. Importantly, the sputum was not smear positive. All of this suggests a low organism burden. One possibility is that this could reflect colonization with MAC; it is not uncommon for patients with underlying chronic changes in their lung to grow MAC, and it is often difficult to tell whether it is indicative of active disease. Structural lung disease, such as bronchiectasis, predisposes a patient to MAC, but chronic MAC also may cause bronchiectasis. This chicken-and-egg scenario comes up frequently. She may have a MAC infection, but as she is HIV negative and asymptomatic, there is no urgent indication to treat, especially as the burden of therapy is not insignificant.

►Dr. Swamy. Do we need to worry about Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)?

►Dr. Fine. Although she was previously PPD positive, she had already completed 1 year of isoniazid (INH) therapy, making active MTB less likely. From an infection control standpoint, it is important to distinguish MAC from MTB. The former is not contagious, and there is no need for airborne isolation.

►Dr. Swamy. Dr. Fine, where does MAC come from? Does it commonly cause disease?

►Dr. Fine. In the environment, MAC is nearly ubiquitous , especially in water and soil. In one study, 20% of showerheads were positive for MAC; when patients are infected, we may suggest changing/bleaching the showerhead, but there are no definitive recommendations.³ Because MAC is so common in the environment, it is unlikely that measures to target MAC colonization will be clinically meaningful. On the other hand, the incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections is increasing across the US, and it may be a common and frequently underdiagnosed cause of chronic cough, especially in postmenopausal women.

►Dr. Swamy. Four years prior to the current presentation, the patient developed a cough after an upper respiratory tract infection that persisted for more than 2 weeks. Given her history, she underwent a repeat chest CT, which noted a slight increase in nodularity and ground-glass opacity restricted to the RML. She also reported dyspnea on exertion and was referred to the pulmonary medicine department. By the time she arrived, her dyspnea had largely resolved, but she reported persistent fatigue without other systemic symptoms, such as fevers or chills. Dr. Fine, does MAC explain this patient’s dyspnea?

►Dr. Fine. As her pulmonary symptoms resolved in a short period of time with only azithromycin, it is very unlikely that her symptoms were related to her prior disease. The MAC infection is not likely to cause dyspnea on exertion and fatigue and should be worked up more broadly before attributing it to MAC. In view of this, it would not be unreasonable to follow her clinically and see her again in 6 to 8 weeks. In this context, we also should consider the untoward impact of repeated radiation exposure derived from multiple CT scans. When a patient has an abnormality on CT scan, it often leads to further scans even if the symptoms do not match the previous findings, as in this case.

►Dr. Swamy. Given her ongoing fatigue and systemic symptoms (morning stiffness of the shoulders, legs, and thighs, and leg cramps), she was referred to the rheumatology department where the physical examination revealed muscle tenderness in her proximal arms and legs with normal strength, tender points at the elbows and medial side of the bilateral knees, significant tenderness of lower legs, and no synovitis.

Dr. Monach, can you walk us through your approach to this patient? Are we seeing manifestations of fibromyalgia? What diagnoses concerns you and how would you proceed?

►Dr. Monach. The history and exam are most helpful in raising or reducing suspicion for an underlying inflammatory disease. Areas of tenderness described in her case are typical of fibromyalgia, although it can be difficult to interpret symptoms in the hip girdle and shoulder girdle because objective findings are often absent on exam in patients with inflammatory arthritis or bursitis. Similarly, tenderness at sites of tendon insertion (enthuses) without objective abnormalities is common in different forms of spondyloarthritis, so tenderness at the elbow, knee, lateral hip, and low back can be difficult to interpret. What this patient is lacking is prominent subjective or objective findings in the joints most commonly affected in rheumatoid arthritis and lupus: wrists, hands, ankles, and feet.

►Dr. Swamy. Initial laboratory data include an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 79 with a normal C-reactive protein. A tentative diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatic is made with consideration of a trial treatment of prednisone.

Dr. Monach, this patient has an indolent infection and is about to be given glucocorticoids. Could you describe the situations in which you feel that glucocorticoids cause a relative immunosuppression?

►Dr. Monach. Glucocorticoids are considered safe in a patient whose infection is not intrinsically dangerous or who has started appropriate antibiotics for that infection. Although all toxicities of glucocorticoids are dose dependent, the long-standing assertion that doses below 10 mg to 15 mg do not increase risk of infection is contradicted by data published in the past 10 to 15 years, with the caveat that these patients were on long-term treatment.

►Dr. Swamy. The patient was started on prednisone 15 mg per day for 15 days. She returned to the clinic after 1 week of prednisone troutment and noted “significant improvement in fatigue, morning stiffness of shoulders, thighs, leg, back is better, leg cramps resolved, shooting pain in many joints resolved.” Further laboratory results were notable for a negative rheumatoid factor, negative antinuclear antibody, and a cyclic citrullinated peptide of 60. A presumptive diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was made and plaquenil 200 mg twice daily was started.

Dr. Monach, can you explain why RA comes up now on serology but was not considered initially? Why does this presentation fit RA, and was her response to treatment typical? How does this fit in with her previous diagnosis of fibromyalgia? Was that just an atypical, indolent presentation of RA?

►Dr. Monach. Though her presentation is atypical for RA, in elderly patients, RA can present with symptoms resembling polymyalgia rheumatica. The question is whether she had RA all along (in which case “elderly onset” would not apply) or had fibromyalgia and developed RA more recently. The response to empiric glucocorticoid therapy is helpful, since fibromyalgia should not improve with prednisone even in a patient with RA unless treatment of RA would allow better sleep and ability to exercise. Rheumatoid arthritis typically responds very well to prednisone in the 5-mg to 15-mg range.

►Dr. Swamy. Given the new diagnosis of an inflammatory arthritis requiring immunosuppression, bronchoscopy with BAL is performed to evaluate for the presence of MAC. These cultures were positive for MAC.

Dr. Fine, does the positive BAL culture indicate an active MAC infection?

►Dr. Fine. Yes, based on these updated data, the patient has an active MAC infection. Active infection is defined as symptoms or imaging consistent with the diagnosis, supporting microbiology data (either 2 sputum or 1 BAL sample growing MAC) and the exclusion of other causes. Previously, this patient grew MAC in just one expectorated sputum; this did not meet the microbiologic criteria. Now sputum has grown in the BAL sample; along with the CT imaging, this is enough to diagnosis active MAC infection.

Treatment for MAC must consider the details of each case. First, this is not an emergency; treatment decisions should be made with the rheumatologist to consider the planned immunosuppression. For example, we must consider potential drug interactions. A specific point should be made of the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibition, which data indicate can reactivate TB and may inhibit mechanisms that restrain mycobacterial disease. Serious cases of MAC infection have been reported in the literature in the setting of TNF-α inhibition.^5,6 Despite these concerns, there is not a contraindication to using these therapies from the perspective of the active MAC disease. All of these decisions will impact the need to commit the patient to MAC therapy.

►Dr. Swamy. Dr. Fine, what do you consider prior to initiating MAC therapy?

► Dr. Fine. The decision to pursue MAC therapy should not be taken lightly. Therapy often entails prolonged multidrug regimens, usually spanning more than a year, with frequent adverse effects. Outside of very specific cases, such as TNF-β inhibition, MAC is rarely a life-threatening disease, so the benefit may be limited. Treatment for MAC is certainly unlikely to be fruitful without a diligent and motivated patient able to handle the high and prolonged pill burden. Of note, it is also important to keep this patient up-to-date with influenza and pneumonia vaccination given her structural lung disease.

►Dr. Swamy. The decision is made to treat MAC with azithromycin, rifampin, and ethambutol. The disease is noted to be nonfibrocavitary. The patient underwent monthly liver function test monitoring and visual acuity testing, which were unremarkable. Dr. Fine, can you describe the phenotypes of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease?

►Dr. Fine. There are 3 main phenotypes of NTM.³ First, we see the elderly man with preexisting lung disease—usually chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—with fibrocavitary and/or reticulonodular appearance. Second, we see the slim, elderly woman often without any preexisting lung disease presenting with focal bronchiectasis and nodular lesions in right middle lobe and lingula—the Lady Windermere syndrome. This eponym is derived from Oscar Wilde’s play “Lady Windermere’s Fan, a Play About a Good Woman,” and was first associated with this disease in 1992.⁷ At the time, it was thought that the voluntary suppression of cough led to poorly draining lung regions, vulnerable to engraftment by atypical mycobacteria. Infection with atypical mycobacteria are associated with this population; however, it is no longer thought to be due to the voluntary suppression of cough.^7,8 Third, we do occasionally see atypical presentations, such as focal masses and solitary nodules.

►Dr. Swamy. At 1-year follow-up she successfully completed MAC therapy and noted ongoing control of rheumatoid symptoms.

Case Presentation. A 64-year-old US Army veteran with a history of colorectal cancer, melanoma, and fibrinolytic presented with dyspnea to VA Boston Healthcare System (VABHS). Seven years prior to the current presentation, at the time of her diagnosis of colorectal cancer, the patient was found to be HIV negative but to have a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test. She was treated with isoniazid (INH) therapy for 9 months. Sputum cultures collected prior to initiation of therapy grew Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in 1 of 3 samples, with these results reported several months after initiation of therapy. She was a never smoker with no known travel or exposure. At the time of the current presentation, her medications included bupropion, levothyroxine, capsaicin, cyclobenzaprine, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen.

►Lakshmana Swamy, MD, Chief Medical Resident, VABHS and Boston Medical Center. Dr. Monach, this patient is on a variety of pain medications and has a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. This diagnosis often frustrates doctors and patients alike. Can you tell us about fibromyalgia from the rheumatologist’s perspective and what you think of her current treatment regimen?

►Paul A. Monach, MD, PhD, Chief, Section of Rheumatology, VABHS and Associate Professor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine. Fibromyalgia is a syndrome of chronic widespread pain without known pathology in the musculoskeletal system. It is thought to be caused by chronic dysfunction of pain-processing pathways in the central nervous system (CNS). It is often accompanied by other somatic symptoms such as chronic fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, and bladder pain. It is a common condition, affecting up to 5% of otherwise healthy women. It is particularly common in persons with chronic nonrestorative sleep or posttraumatic stress disorder from a wide range of causes. However, it also is more common in persons with autoimmune inflammatory diseases, such as lupus, Sjögren syndrome, or rheumatoid arthritis. Concern for one of these diseases is the main reason to consider referring a patient for evaluation by a rheumatologist. Often rheumatologists participate in the management of fibromyalgia. A patient should be given appropriate expectations by the referring physician.

Effectiveness of treatment varies widely among patients. Nonpharmacologic approaches such as aerobic exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and tai chi have support from clinical trials, and yoga and aquatherapy also are widely used.^1,2 The classes of drugs used are the same as for neuropathic pain: tricyclics, including cyclobenzaprine; serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); and gabapentinoids. In contrast, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are ineffective unless there is a superimposed mechanical or inflammatory cause in the periphery. The key point is that continuation of any treatment should be based entirely on the patient’s own assessment of benefit.

►Dr. Swamy. Seven years later, the patient returned to her primary care provider, reporting increased dyspnea on exertion as well as significant fatigue. She was referred to the pulmonary department and had repeat computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, which indicated persistent right middle lobe (RML) bronchiectasis. She then underwent bronchoscopy with a subsequent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture growing MAC. Dr. Fine, please interpret the baseline and follow-up CT scans and help us understand the significance of the MAC on sputum and BAL cultures.

►Alan Fine, MD, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, VABHS and Professor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine. Prior to this presentation, the patient had a pleural-based area of fibrosis with possible associated RML bronchiectasis. This appears to be a postinflammatory process without classic features of malignant or metastatic disease. She then had a sputum, which grew MAC in only 1 of 3 samples and in liquid media only. Importantly, the sputum was not smear positive. All of this suggests a low organism burden. One possibility is that this could reflect colonization with MAC; it is not uncommon for patients with underlying chronic changes in their lung to grow MAC, and it is often difficult to tell whether it is indicative of active disease. Structural lung disease, such as bronchiectasis, predisposes a patient to MAC, but chronic MAC also may cause bronchiectasis. This chicken-and-egg scenario comes up frequently. She may have a MAC infection, but as she is HIV negative and asymptomatic, there is no urgent indication to treat, especially as the burden of therapy is not insignificant.

►Dr. Swamy. Do we need to worry about Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)?

►Dr. Fine. Although she was previously PPD positive, she had already completed 1 year of isoniazid (INH) therapy, making active MTB less likely. From an infection control standpoint, it is important to distinguish MAC from MTB. The former is not contagious, and there is no need for airborne isolation.

►Dr. Swamy. Dr. Fine, where does MAC come from? Does it commonly cause disease?

►Dr. Fine. In the environment, MAC is nearly ubiquitous , especially in water and soil. In one study, 20% of showerheads were positive for MAC; when patients are infected, we may suggest changing/bleaching the showerhead, but there are no definitive recommendations.³ Because MAC is so common in the environment, it is unlikely that measures to target MAC colonization will be clinically meaningful. On the other hand, the incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections is increasing across the US, and it may be a common and frequently underdiagnosed cause of chronic cough, especially in postmenopausal women.

►Dr. Swamy. Four years prior to the current presentation, the patient developed a cough after an upper respiratory tract infection that persisted for more than 2 weeks. Given her history, she underwent a repeat chest CT, which noted a slight increase in nodularity and ground-glass opacity restricted to the RML. She also reported dyspnea on exertion and was referred to the pulmonary medicine department. By the time she arrived, her dyspnea had largely resolved, but she reported persistent fatigue without other systemic symptoms, such as fevers or chills. Dr. Fine, does MAC explain this patient’s dyspnea?

►Dr. Fine. As her pulmonary symptoms resolved in a short period of time with only azithromycin, it is very unlikely that her symptoms were related to her prior disease. The MAC infection is not likely to cause dyspnea on exertion and fatigue and should be worked up more broadly before attributing it to MAC. In view of this, it would not be unreasonable to follow her clinically and see her again in 6 to 8 weeks. In this context, we also should consider the untoward impact of repeated radiation exposure derived from multiple CT scans. When a patient has an abnormality on CT scan, it often leads to further scans even if the symptoms do not match the previous findings, as in this case.

►Dr. Swamy. Given her ongoing fatigue and systemic symptoms (morning stiffness of the shoulders, legs, and thighs, and leg cramps), she was referred to the rheumatology department where the physical examination revealed muscle tenderness in her proximal arms and legs with normal strength, tender points at the elbows and medial side of the bilateral knees, significant tenderness of lower legs, and no synovitis.

Dr. Monach, can you walk us through your approach to this patient? Are we seeing manifestations of fibromyalgia? What diagnoses concerns you and how would you proceed?

►Dr. Monach. The history and exam are most helpful in raising or reducing suspicion for an underlying inflammatory disease. Areas of tenderness described in her case are typical of fibromyalgia, although it can be difficult to interpret symptoms in the hip girdle and shoulder girdle because objective findings are often absent on exam in patients with inflammatory arthritis or bursitis. Similarly, tenderness at sites of tendon insertion (enthuses) without objective abnormalities is common in different forms of spondyloarthritis, so tenderness at the elbow, knee, lateral hip, and low back can be difficult to interpret. What this patient is lacking is prominent subjective or objective findings in the joints most commonly affected in rheumatoid arthritis and lupus: wrists, hands, ankles, and feet.

►Dr. Swamy. Initial laboratory data include an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 79 with a normal C-reactive protein. A tentative diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatic is made with consideration of a trial treatment of prednisone.

Dr. Monach, this patient has an indolent infection and is about to be given glucocorticoids. Could you describe the situations in which you feel that glucocorticoids cause a relative immunosuppression?

►Dr. Monach. Glucocorticoids are considered safe in a patient whose infection is not intrinsically dangerous or who has started appropriate antibiotics for that infection. Although all toxicities of glucocorticoids are dose dependent, the long-standing assertion that doses below 10 mg to 15 mg do not increase risk of infection is contradicted by data published in the past 10 to 15 years, with the caveat that these patients were on long-term treatment.

►Dr. Swamy. The patient was started on prednisone 15 mg per day for 15 days. She returned to the clinic after 1 week of prednisone troutment and noted “significant improvement in fatigue, morning stiffness of shoulders, thighs, leg, back is better, leg cramps resolved, shooting pain in many joints resolved.” Further laboratory results were notable for a negative rheumatoid factor, negative antinuclear antibody, and a cyclic citrullinated peptide of 60. A presumptive diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was made and plaquenil 200 mg twice daily was started.

Dr. Monach, can you explain why RA comes up now on serology but was not considered initially? Why does this presentation fit RA, and was her response to treatment typical? How does this fit in with her previous diagnosis of fibromyalgia? Was that just an atypical, indolent presentation of RA?

►Dr. Monach. Though her presentation is atypical for RA, in elderly patients, RA can present with symptoms resembling polymyalgia rheumatica. The question is whether she had RA all along (in which case “elderly onset” would not apply) or had fibromyalgia and developed RA more recently. The response to empiric glucocorticoid therapy is helpful, since fibromyalgia should not improve with prednisone even in a patient with RA unless treatment of RA would allow better sleep and ability to exercise. Rheumatoid arthritis typically responds very well to prednisone in the 5-mg to 15-mg range.

►Dr. Swamy. Given the new diagnosis of an inflammatory arthritis requiring immunosuppression, bronchoscopy with BAL is performed to evaluate for the presence of MAC. These cultures were positive for MAC.

Dr. Fine, does the positive BAL culture indicate an active MAC infection?

►Dr. Fine. Yes, based on these updated data, the patient has an active MAC infection. Active infection is defined as symptoms or imaging consistent with the diagnosis, supporting microbiology data (either 2 sputum or 1 BAL sample growing MAC) and the exclusion of other causes. Previously, this patient grew MAC in just one expectorated sputum; this did not meet the microbiologic criteria. Now sputum has grown in the BAL sample; along with the CT imaging, this is enough to diagnosis active MAC infection.

Treatment for MAC must consider the details of each case. First, this is not an emergency; treatment decisions should be made with the rheumatologist to consider the planned immunosuppression. For example, we must consider potential drug interactions. A specific point should be made of the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibition, which data indicate can reactivate TB and may inhibit mechanisms that restrain mycobacterial disease. Serious cases of MAC infection have been reported in the literature in the setting of TNF-α inhibition.^5,6 Despite these concerns, there is not a contraindication to using these therapies from the perspective of the active MAC disease. All of these decisions will impact the need to commit the patient to MAC therapy.

►Dr. Swamy. Dr. Fine, what do you consider prior to initiating MAC therapy?

► Dr. Fine. The decision to pursue MAC therapy should not be taken lightly. Therapy often entails prolonged multidrug regimens, usually spanning more than a year, with frequent adverse effects. Outside of very specific cases, such as TNF-β inhibition, MAC is rarely a life-threatening disease, so the benefit may be limited. Treatment for MAC is certainly unlikely to be fruitful without a diligent and motivated patient able to handle the high and prolonged pill burden. Of note, it is also important to keep this patient up-to-date with influenza and pneumonia vaccination given her structural lung disease.

►Dr. Swamy. The decision is made to treat MAC with azithromycin, rifampin, and ethambutol. The disease is noted to be nonfibrocavitary. The patient underwent monthly liver function test monitoring and visual acuity testing, which were unremarkable. Dr. Fine, can you describe the phenotypes of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease?

►Dr. Fine. There are 3 main phenotypes of NTM.³ First, we see the elderly man with preexisting lung disease—usually chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—with fibrocavitary and/or reticulonodular appearance. Second, we see the slim, elderly woman often without any preexisting lung disease presenting with focal bronchiectasis and nodular lesions in right middle lobe and lingula—the Lady Windermere syndrome. This eponym is derived from Oscar Wilde’s play “Lady Windermere’s Fan, a Play About a Good Woman,” and was first associated with this disease in 1992.⁷ At the time, it was thought that the voluntary suppression of cough led to poorly draining lung regions, vulnerable to engraftment by atypical mycobacteria. Infection with atypical mycobacteria are associated with this population; however, it is no longer thought to be due to the voluntary suppression of cough.^7,8 Third, we do occasionally see atypical presentations, such as focal masses and solitary nodules.

►Dr. Swamy. At 1-year follow-up she successfully completed MAC therapy and noted ongoing control of rheumatoid symptoms.

Case Presentation. A 64-year-old US Army veteran with a history of colorectal cancer, melanoma, and fibrinolytic presented with dyspnea to VA Boston Healthcare System (VABHS). Seven years prior to the current presentation, at the time of her diagnosis of colorectal cancer, the patient was found to be HIV negative but to have a positive purified protein derivative (PPD) test. She was treated with isoniazid (INH) therapy for 9 months. Sputum cultures collected prior to initiation of therapy grew Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) in 1 of 3 samples, with these results reported several months after initiation of therapy. She was a never smoker with no known travel or exposure. At the time of the current presentation, her medications included bupropion, levothyroxine, capsaicin, cyclobenzaprine, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen.

►Lakshmana Swamy, MD, Chief Medical Resident, VABHS and Boston Medical Center. Dr. Monach, this patient is on a variety of pain medications and has a diagnosis of fibromyalgia. This diagnosis often frustrates doctors and patients alike. Can you tell us about fibromyalgia from the rheumatologist’s perspective and what you think of her current treatment regimen?

►Paul A. Monach, MD, PhD, Chief, Section of Rheumatology, VABHS and Associate Professor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine. Fibromyalgia is a syndrome of chronic widespread pain without known pathology in the musculoskeletal system. It is thought to be caused by chronic dysfunction of pain-processing pathways in the central nervous system (CNS). It is often accompanied by other somatic symptoms such as chronic fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, and bladder pain. It is a common condition, affecting up to 5% of otherwise healthy women. It is particularly common in persons with chronic nonrestorative sleep or posttraumatic stress disorder from a wide range of causes. However, it also is more common in persons with autoimmune inflammatory diseases, such as lupus, Sjögren syndrome, or rheumatoid arthritis. Concern for one of these diseases is the main reason to consider referring a patient for evaluation by a rheumatologist. Often rheumatologists participate in the management of fibromyalgia. A patient should be given appropriate expectations by the referring physician.

Effectiveness of treatment varies widely among patients. Nonpharmacologic approaches such as aerobic exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and tai chi have support from clinical trials, and yoga and aquatherapy also are widely used.^1,2 The classes of drugs used are the same as for neuropathic pain: tricyclics, including cyclobenzaprine; serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); and gabapentinoids. In contrast, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids are ineffective unless there is a superimposed mechanical or inflammatory cause in the periphery. The key point is that continuation of any treatment should be based entirely on the patient’s own assessment of benefit.

►Dr. Swamy. Seven years later, the patient returned to her primary care provider, reporting increased dyspnea on exertion as well as significant fatigue. She was referred to the pulmonary department and had repeat computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, which indicated persistent right middle lobe (RML) bronchiectasis. She then underwent bronchoscopy with a subsequent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) culture growing MAC. Dr. Fine, please interpret the baseline and follow-up CT scans and help us understand the significance of the MAC on sputum and BAL cultures.

►Alan Fine, MD, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, VABHS and Professor of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine. Prior to this presentation, the patient had a pleural-based area of fibrosis with possible associated RML bronchiectasis. This appears to be a postinflammatory process without classic features of malignant or metastatic disease. She then had a sputum, which grew MAC in only 1 of 3 samples and in liquid media only. Importantly, the sputum was not smear positive. All of this suggests a low organism burden. One possibility is that this could reflect colonization with MAC; it is not uncommon for patients with underlying chronic changes in their lung to grow MAC, and it is often difficult to tell whether it is indicative of active disease. Structural lung disease, such as bronchiectasis, predisposes a patient to MAC, but chronic MAC also may cause bronchiectasis. This chicken-and-egg scenario comes up frequently. She may have a MAC infection, but as she is HIV negative and asymptomatic, there is no urgent indication to treat, especially as the burden of therapy is not insignificant.

►Dr. Swamy. Do we need to worry about Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)?

►Dr. Fine. Although she was previously PPD positive, she had already completed 1 year of isoniazid (INH) therapy, making active MTB less likely. From an infection control standpoint, it is important to distinguish MAC from MTB. The former is not contagious, and there is no need for airborne isolation.

►Dr. Swamy. Dr. Fine, where does MAC come from? Does it commonly cause disease?

►Dr. Fine. In the environment, MAC is nearly ubiquitous , especially in water and soil. In one study, 20% of showerheads were positive for MAC; when patients are infected, we may suggest changing/bleaching the showerhead, but there are no definitive recommendations.³ Because MAC is so common in the environment, it is unlikely that measures to target MAC colonization will be clinically meaningful. On the other hand, the incidence of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections is increasing across the US, and it may be a common and frequently underdiagnosed cause of chronic cough, especially in postmenopausal women.

►Dr. Swamy. Four years prior to the current presentation, the patient developed a cough after an upper respiratory tract infection that persisted for more than 2 weeks. Given her history, she underwent a repeat chest CT, which noted a slight increase in nodularity and ground-glass opacity restricted to the RML. She also reported dyspnea on exertion and was referred to the pulmonary medicine department. By the time she arrived, her dyspnea had largely resolved, but she reported persistent fatigue without other systemic symptoms, such as fevers or chills. Dr. Fine, does MAC explain this patient’s dyspnea?

►Dr. Fine. As her pulmonary symptoms resolved in a short period of time with only azithromycin, it is very unlikely that her symptoms were related to her prior disease. The MAC infection is not likely to cause dyspnea on exertion and fatigue and should be worked up more broadly before attributing it to MAC. In view of this, it would not be unreasonable to follow her clinically and see her again in 6 to 8 weeks. In this context, we also should consider the untoward impact of repeated radiation exposure derived from multiple CT scans. When a patient has an abnormality on CT scan, it often leads to further scans even if the symptoms do not match the previous findings, as in this case.

►Dr. Swamy. Given her ongoing fatigue and systemic symptoms (morning stiffness of the shoulders, legs, and thighs, and leg cramps), she was referred to the rheumatology department where the physical examination revealed muscle tenderness in her proximal arms and legs with normal strength, tender points at the elbows and medial side of the bilateral knees, significant tenderness of lower legs, and no synovitis.

Dr. Monach, can you walk us through your approach to this patient? Are we seeing manifestations of fibromyalgia? What diagnoses concerns you and how would you proceed?

►Dr. Monach. The history and exam are most helpful in raising or reducing suspicion for an underlying inflammatory disease. Areas of tenderness described in her case are typical of fibromyalgia, although it can be difficult to interpret symptoms in the hip girdle and shoulder girdle because objective findings are often absent on exam in patients with inflammatory arthritis or bursitis. Similarly, tenderness at sites of tendon insertion (enthuses) without objective abnormalities is common in different forms of spondyloarthritis, so tenderness at the elbow, knee, lateral hip, and low back can be difficult to interpret. What this patient is lacking is prominent subjective or objective findings in the joints most commonly affected in rheumatoid arthritis and lupus: wrists, hands, ankles, and feet.

►Dr. Swamy. Initial laboratory data include an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 79 with a normal C-reactive protein. A tentative diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatic is made with consideration of a trial treatment of prednisone.

Dr. Monach, this patient has an indolent infection and is about to be given glucocorticoids. Could you describe the situations in which you feel that glucocorticoids cause a relative immunosuppression?

►Dr. Monach. Glucocorticoids are considered safe in a patient whose infection is not intrinsically dangerous or who has started appropriate antibiotics for that infection. Although all toxicities of glucocorticoids are dose dependent, the long-standing assertion that doses below 10 mg to 15 mg do not increase risk of infection is contradicted by data published in the past 10 to 15 years, with the caveat that these patients were on long-term treatment.

►Dr. Swamy. The patient was started on prednisone 15 mg per day for 15 days. She returned to the clinic after 1 week of prednisone troutment and noted “significant improvement in fatigue, morning stiffness of shoulders, thighs, leg, back is better, leg cramps resolved, shooting pain in many joints resolved.” Further laboratory results were notable for a negative rheumatoid factor, negative antinuclear antibody, and a cyclic citrullinated peptide of 60. A presumptive diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was made and plaquenil 200 mg twice daily was started.

Dr. Monach, can you explain why RA comes up now on serology but was not considered initially? Why does this presentation fit RA, and was her response to treatment typical? How does this fit in with her previous diagnosis of fibromyalgia? Was that just an atypical, indolent presentation of RA?

►Dr. Monach. Though her presentation is atypical for RA, in elderly patients, RA can present with symptoms resembling polymyalgia rheumatica. The question is whether she had RA all along (in which case “elderly onset” would not apply) or had fibromyalgia and developed RA more recently. The response to empiric glucocorticoid therapy is helpful, since fibromyalgia should not improve with prednisone even in a patient with RA unless treatment of RA would allow better sleep and ability to exercise. Rheumatoid arthritis typically responds very well to prednisone in the 5-mg to 15-mg range.

►Dr. Swamy. Given the new diagnosis of an inflammatory arthritis requiring immunosuppression, bronchoscopy with BAL is performed to evaluate for the presence of MAC. These cultures were positive for MAC.

Dr. Fine, does the positive BAL culture indicate an active MAC infection?

►Dr. Fine. Yes, based on these updated data, the patient has an active MAC infection. Active infection is defined as symptoms or imaging consistent with the diagnosis, supporting microbiology data (either 2 sputum or 1 BAL sample growing MAC) and the exclusion of other causes. Previously, this patient grew MAC in just one expectorated sputum; this did not meet the microbiologic criteria. Now sputum has grown in the BAL sample; along with the CT imaging, this is enough to diagnosis active MAC infection.

Treatment for MAC must consider the details of each case. First, this is not an emergency; treatment decisions should be made with the rheumatologist to consider the planned immunosuppression. For example, we must consider potential drug interactions. A specific point should be made of the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibition, which data indicate can reactivate TB and may inhibit mechanisms that restrain mycobacterial disease. Serious cases of MAC infection have been reported in the literature in the setting of TNF-α inhibition.^5,6 Despite these concerns, there is not a contraindication to using these therapies from the perspective of the active MAC disease. All of these decisions will impact the need to commit the patient to MAC therapy.

►Dr. Swamy. Dr. Fine, what do you consider prior to initiating MAC therapy?

► Dr. Fine. The decision to pursue MAC therapy should not be taken lightly. Therapy often entails prolonged multidrug regimens, usually spanning more than a year, with frequent adverse effects. Outside of very specific cases, such as TNF-β inhibition, MAC is rarely a life-threatening disease, so the benefit may be limited. Treatment for MAC is certainly unlikely to be fruitful without a diligent and motivated patient able to handle the high and prolonged pill burden. Of note, it is also important to keep this patient up-to-date with influenza and pneumonia vaccination given her structural lung disease.

►Dr. Swamy. The decision is made to treat MAC with azithromycin, rifampin, and ethambutol. The disease is noted to be nonfibrocavitary. The patient underwent monthly liver function test monitoring and visual acuity testing, which were unremarkable. Dr. Fine, can you describe the phenotypes of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) disease?

►Dr. Fine. There are 3 main phenotypes of NTM.³ First, we see the elderly man with preexisting lung disease—usually chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—with fibrocavitary and/or reticulonodular appearance. Second, we see the slim, elderly woman often without any preexisting lung disease presenting with focal bronchiectasis and nodular lesions in right middle lobe and lingula—the Lady Windermere syndrome. This eponym is derived from Oscar Wilde’s play “Lady Windermere’s Fan, a Play About a Good Woman,” and was first associated with this disease in 1992.⁷ At the time, it was thought that the voluntary suppression of cough led to poorly draining lung regions, vulnerable to engraftment by atypical mycobacteria. Infection with atypical mycobacteria are associated with this population; however, it is no longer thought to be due to the voluntary suppression of cough.^7,8 Third, we do occasionally see atypical presentations, such as focal masses and solitary nodules.

►Dr. Swamy. At 1-year follow-up she successfully completed MAC therapy and noted ongoing control of rheumatoid symptoms.

Micrograph showing MM

MorphoSys AG has decided to stop developing MOR202 as a treatment for multiple myeloma (MM).

However, MorphoSys said it will complete the ongoing phase 1/2a trial of MOR202, and I-Mab Biopharma will continue developing MOR202 as an MM therapy for the Greater China region.

MOR202 is a human monoclonal HuCAL antibody directed against CD38, a validated target in MM.

MorphoSys is testing MOR202 in combination with other drugs in a phase 1/2a trial of patients with relapsed/refractory MM (NCT01421186).

The patients were assigned to receive MOR202 plus dexamethasone (Dex), MOR202 plus lenalidomide (Len) and Dex, or MOR202 plus pomalidomide (Pom) and Dex.

Results from this study were presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Societies for Hematology and Medical Oncology.

Data were reported for 38 patients—18 who had received MOR202 plus Dex, 7 who had received MOR202 plus Pom and Dex, and 13 who had received MOR202 plus Len and Dex.

The researchers said the maximum-tolerated dose of MOR202, alone or in combination, had not yet been reached. However, the data suggested MOR202 can be safely administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion at doses up to 16 mg/kg.

The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events observed were hematologic in nature (leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia).

One patient discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (decrease in platelet count) that may have been caused by MOR202 or Dex. One patient developed a transient anti-MOR202 antibody response.

There were no treatment-related deaths.

Efficacy data were available for 31 of the 38 patients. Fifteen patients responded (2 with complete responses). There were 7 responses in the Len/Dex arm, 5 in the Dex arm, and 3 in the Pom/Dex arm. Twelve responses were ongoing for up to 56 weeks.

MorphoSys said it expects to present final results from this study at an upcoming medical conference.

MorphoSys also said it will continue to support I-Mab Biopharma’s development of MOR202 in Greater China (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao).

In November 2017, MorphoSys and I-Mab entered into an exclusive regional licensing agreement to develop and commercialize MOR202 in Greater China. I-Mab assumed exclusive responsibility for all subsequent development and commercialization of MOR202 in the agreed territory.

Micrograph showing MM

MorphoSys AG has decided to stop developing MOR202 as a treatment for multiple myeloma (MM).

However, MorphoSys said it will complete the ongoing phase 1/2a trial of MOR202, and I-Mab Biopharma will continue developing MOR202 as an MM therapy for the Greater China region.

MOR202 is a human monoclonal HuCAL antibody directed against CD38, a validated target in MM.

MorphoSys is testing MOR202 in combination with other drugs in a phase 1/2a trial of patients with relapsed/refractory MM (NCT01421186).

The patients were assigned to receive MOR202 plus dexamethasone (Dex), MOR202 plus lenalidomide (Len) and Dex, or MOR202 plus pomalidomide (Pom) and Dex.

Results from this study were presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Societies for Hematology and Medical Oncology.

Data were reported for 38 patients—18 who had received MOR202 plus Dex, 7 who had received MOR202 plus Pom and Dex, and 13 who had received MOR202 plus Len and Dex.

The researchers said the maximum-tolerated dose of MOR202, alone or in combination, had not yet been reached. However, the data suggested MOR202 can be safely administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion at doses up to 16 mg/kg.

The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events observed were hematologic in nature (leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia).

One patient discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (decrease in platelet count) that may have been caused by MOR202 or Dex. One patient developed a transient anti-MOR202 antibody response.

There were no treatment-related deaths.

Efficacy data were available for 31 of the 38 patients. Fifteen patients responded (2 with complete responses). There were 7 responses in the Len/Dex arm, 5 in the Dex arm, and 3 in the Pom/Dex arm. Twelve responses were ongoing for up to 56 weeks.

MorphoSys said it expects to present final results from this study at an upcoming medical conference.

MorphoSys also said it will continue to support I-Mab Biopharma’s development of MOR202 in Greater China (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao).

In November 2017, MorphoSys and I-Mab entered into an exclusive regional licensing agreement to develop and commercialize MOR202 in Greater China. I-Mab assumed exclusive responsibility for all subsequent development and commercialization of MOR202 in the agreed territory.

Micrograph showing MM

MorphoSys AG has decided to stop developing MOR202 as a treatment for multiple myeloma (MM).

However, MorphoSys said it will complete the ongoing phase 1/2a trial of MOR202, and I-Mab Biopharma will continue developing MOR202 as an MM therapy for the Greater China region.

MOR202 is a human monoclonal HuCAL antibody directed against CD38, a validated target in MM.

MorphoSys is testing MOR202 in combination with other drugs in a phase 1/2a trial of patients with relapsed/refractory MM (NCT01421186).

The patients were assigned to receive MOR202 plus dexamethasone (Dex), MOR202 plus lenalidomide (Len) and Dex, or MOR202 plus pomalidomide (Pom) and Dex.

Results from this study were presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Societies for Hematology and Medical Oncology.

Data were reported for 38 patients—18 who had received MOR202 plus Dex, 7 who had received MOR202 plus Pom and Dex, and 13 who had received MOR202 plus Len and Dex.

The researchers said the maximum-tolerated dose of MOR202, alone or in combination, had not yet been reached. However, the data suggested MOR202 can be safely administered as a 2-hour intravenous infusion at doses up to 16 mg/kg.

The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events observed were hematologic in nature (leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia).

One patient discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (decrease in platelet count) that may have been caused by MOR202 or Dex. One patient developed a transient anti-MOR202 antibody response.

There were no treatment-related deaths.

Efficacy data were available for 31 of the 38 patients. Fifteen patients responded (2 with complete responses). There were 7 responses in the Len/Dex arm, 5 in the Dex arm, and 3 in the Pom/Dex arm. Twelve responses were ongoing for up to 56 weeks.

MorphoSys said it expects to present final results from this study at an upcoming medical conference.

MorphoSys also said it will continue to support I-Mab Biopharma’s development of MOR202 in Greater China (China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao).

In November 2017, MorphoSys and I-Mab entered into an exclusive regional licensing agreement to develop and commercialize MOR202 in Greater China. I-Mab assumed exclusive responsibility for all subsequent development and commercialization of MOR202 in the agreed territory.