Xenomelia, literally meaning “foreign limb,” is a neuropsychiatric condition in which nonpsychotic individuals have an intense, persistent belief that one or more of their limbs does not belong to their body; instead they regard it as an alien appendage that should be discarded.¹ This unwavering, fixed belief resembles a delusion and is often debilitating to the point where the affected person strongly desires amputation of the unwanted limb. Traditionally, such requests often are denied by the medical community, which may cause an individual who has xenomelia to attempt risky self-amputation, or to injure the limb in a manner that makes subsequent amputation medically necessary.¹

The name for this condition has evolved over the years, depending on the emphasis given to specific characteristics. It was once called apotemnophilia, meaning “love of amputation,” when the condition was believed to be a fetish involving sexual gratification derived from being an amputee.^2,3 The term “body integrity identity disorder” (BIID) was introduced several decades later to incorporate the condition into a broader spectrum of accepted psychiatric pathologies, reasoning that it was the cause of a mismatch between objective and subjective body schema, similar to anorexia nervosa or body dysmorphic disorder.^4,5 This name also served to draw parallels between this condition and gender identity disorder. However, unlike these other disorders, individuals with this condition have sufficient factual insight to know they appear “normal” to others. The newest term, xenomelia, was established to acknowledge the neurologic component of the condition after neuroimaging studies showed structural changes to the right parietal lobe in individuals who desired amputation of their left lower limb, thus linking the part of the brain that processes sensory input from the affected limb.⁶

While particular nuances in symptomatology were modified in formulating these older names, certain hallmark features of xenomelia have remained the same.⁷ The condition starts in early childhood, prior to puberty. Those who have it feel intense distress, and are resigned to the notion that nothing but amputation can alleviate their distress. Xenomelia is overwhelmingly more common in males than females. It is accompanied by nontraditional attitudes about disability, including admiration of amputees and complete apathy and disregard toward the impairment that amputation would cause.

While the data are insufficient to draw a definitive conclusion, the trend in the published literature suggests in xenomelia, the lower left leg is predominantly the limb implicated in the condition, in right-handed individuals.¹

Here, we describe the case of a young man, Mr. H, with xenomelia who contacted us after reading about this condition in a review we recently published.¹ He agreed to allow us to anonymously describe his history and symptoms so that clinicians can recognize and help other individuals with xenomelia. His history may also help stimulate exploration of etiological factors and novel treatment strategies for xenomelia, other than amputation of a healthy limb.

CASE

‘I have this limb that should not be’

Mr. H, age 31, is a white male of Eastern European descent who was born, raised, and resides in a major metropolitan area in the western United States. He is married, college-educated, and currently works as a computer programmer for a prominent technology company. During our conversation via telephone, he exhibits above-average intelligence, appears to be in euthymic mood, and speaks with broad affect. Mr. H displays no psychotic symptoms such as overt delusions, hallucinations, reality distortion, or response to internal stimuli. His past psychiatric history includes attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which was diagnosed at age 6 and treated with appropriate medication under the care of a psychiatrist until age 18, when Mr. H decided to discontinue treatment. He no longer endorses symptoms of ADHD. He has no chronic medical conditions other than season allergies, for which he sometimes takes antihistamines, and occasional exacerbation of sciatica, for which he takes an over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication. Mr. H also has episodic insomnia, which he attributes to job-related stress and working odd hours. He was treated for meningitis as an infant, and underwent a bilateral myringotomy as a young child to treat recurrent ear infections. He has no other surgical history. He was raised in a middle-class Christian household that included both parents, who are still alive, still together, and have no significant psychiatric or medical history. He has no siblings.

Although he lives an ostensibly normal life, Mr. H suffers in silence and secrecy with xenomelia. According to him, there was never a time in his life when he didn’t feel that his left leg was “too long” and he was “walking on a stilt.” He says, “It takes a daily toll on my health and well-being.” He can clearly recall being 4 years old and playing games in which he would pretend to injure his left leg. He says, “When we played ‘make believe,’ the game would always end with something ‘happening’ to [my left leg].” He enjoys outdoor sports like snowboarding and mountain biking, and although he denies self-injurious behavior, he says in the event of an accident, he would prefer to land on his left leg, because it is the part of his body that he considers most “expendable.” One of his most vivid memories of childhood was going shopping with his parents and seeing an older man with only one leg standing on crutches in the parking lot outside the entrance. He remembers feeling “jealous” of this man.

Continue to: Although his parents were not particularly wealthy...

Although his parents were not particularly wealthy, they sent him to a private Christian school for most of his childhood. Mr. H admits that while there he didn’t fit in and felt like an outcast, in part because he didn’t come from the level of wealth of his classmates, and because having ADHD left him isolative and avoidant. “I was always the one going away to take medication,” he explains, and he also developed a hostile attitude. He was suspended from school multiple times for fighting. These years left him tremendously anxious and depressed, and he would often find it therapeutic to sit with his left leg bent underneath him, so as to hide its undesired portion. It was common for him to tie his leg up and stare at himself in the mirror for minutes to hours as a form of stress reduction.

Most of Mr. H’s social circle is composed of friends he has known since childhood, none of whom are aware of his condition. He acknowledges that his feelings are “bizarre in nature” and so he has kept this secret on a “need-to-know” basis out of “fear of rejection, mockery, and damage to my reputation.” Through the years, he has sought out and encountered others with this condition, first anonymously on the internet, then in-person once he gets to know and trust them. He claims to know and be friendly with several people with xenomelia in his own city, some of whom have undergone amputation and are extremely happy with the results. According to Mr. H, there is a community aspect to xenomelia in his city, and people with the condition often meet each other socially. He has revealed his secret to 2 women he dated, including his present wife, who he told 3 years into their relationship. “I was prepared for her to leave me,” he recalls. Although he has never connected the desire for amputation with sexuality, he certainly believes that amputating his left leg would enhance his sex life. “Do I find amputees sexy?” he asks, “I would say yes.” On a 10-point scale, he considers his sex life to be a “7 or 8,” and it would reach 10 if he underwent amputation.

Mr. H has a calendar on which he keeps track of the days when he feels “impaired” by his xenomelia. He marks each day as either “red” or “green.” So far, he does not recognize a pattern of exacerbation. “I have my good days, then I have my bad days,” he laments. “On good days, I think about amputation and where my leg should actually end, but it is something I can quickly push off. On my bad days, I am constantly reminded in one way or another that, yes, I have this limb that should not be.” While he has never sought treatment for this condition from a health care professional, he developed his own therapeutic regimen that includes yoga, hiking, and daily use of cannabis, which “helps take the edge off.” He used alcohol in the past as self-medication, but stopped drinking to excess when it started to disrupt other aspects of his life. According to Mr. H, the goal is to distract himself from the condition, which provides temporary relief. “I find if my mind is more engaged, the amputation thoughts are fewer and less in intensity.” He reports that the months leading up to his wedding were particularly therapeutic because wedding planning provided an excellent distraction.

Overall, his current desire for amputation is steadily increasing. “Lately it has become more of a roller coaster,” he says. “If there’s a safe way to do it, I’ll do it.” An amputation would allow him to “feel good, complete, grounded, and content.” If he were to undergo amputation, he would use a prosthetic in order to retain mobility and keep his physique as discreet as possible. He has made initial inquiries into getting an amputation, saying, “I have heard of rumors of surgeons willing to perform the surgery, for a price. However, I have not completed the ‘vetting process’ to actually come into contact with the surgeons themselves.” Similar to others with xenomelia, he is easily able to draw a line on his leg, exactly where the desired amputation should occur.⁸ For most of his life, that line would have been 2 inches above his knee, but in recent years, the line has drifted lower, to 2 inches below the knee. However, he “wouldn’t mind either” line of amputation. He indicates the area below the desired line is less sensitive to pain than the corresponding part of his right leg, particularly his toes.

Mr. H’s wife is extremely supportive and understanding of her husband’s condition, but is opposed to the possibility of amputation (Box).

Box
Xenomelia: A spouse's perspective

Continue to: Much left to be learned about xenomelia

Much left to be learned about xenomelia

What remains to be discovered about xenomelia falls into 2 areas:

• the possible usefulness of various neuroimaging modalities (morphological MRI, functional MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging) to identify and localize anomalous neural pathways or neuroanatomical foci associated with this condition, such as an aberrantly developed or poorly myelinated right parietal lobe, which houses the limb’s physical proprioception
• a biopsychosocial inquiry into whether there exists a specific combination of a given individual’s organic brain, mind, and environmental interactions that may give rise to this condition, and whether we might detect a prodrome that arises in early childhood. The objective of any research into this condition would be to minimize its effects, if not prevent them altogether.¹

As this case illustrates, xenomelia begins in early childhood, with symptoms being reported in children as young as age 3.⁷ However, no published literature has investigated these early stages. We’ve learned that individuals with xenomelia often can point to key childhood experiences or memories related to seeing people with amputated limbs. They remember feeling a sense of wonder, fascination, or other strong emotion. It may be in this memory that xenomelia is permanently imprinted. This was definitely true for Mr. H, who never knew a time when he didn’t endure some level of debilitation from xenomelia, and distinctly remembers feeling jealous upon seeing a man with the amputated leg standing on crutches in a store parking lot. Although he has come across many amputees in his life, Mr. H says he vividly remembers everything about that particular man in that particular moment, adding “I can still see the clothes he was wearing. I can still see the cars in the parking lot.” That was likely his moment of vivid and powerful imprinting.

Particularly influential changes occur in adolescence, not just in the course of physical development, but in the formulation of self-identity, which involves the inevitable comparison of one’s own appearance to that of others, with heightened awareness of what others might perceive. This phenomenon is known as “the imaginary audience,” and it is often overemphasized in the minds of individuals with xenomelia.⁷ Mr. H is a textbook example of someone acutely aware of his “audience,” suffering from the embarrassment that came from being less wealthy than others at his school, and having to manage his ADHD in plain sight of his classmates, who knew that he required medication. It is no surprise that he felt like an outcast and got suspended for fighting. He would relieve anxiety by tying his leg up and staring at himself in the mirror, finding refuge in front of an audience of one that understood and sympathized with his suffering.

Among the most notorious aspects of this condition is investigation into the possibility of there being a sexual component to the desire for amputation. The notion that the desire is a fetish employed for the purpose of sexual arousal was first propagated by Penthouse magazine in the 1970s.⁹ Learning that xenomelia exists in a child long before sexual maturation—and in an older adult long after sexual drive peaks—suggests the condition is independent of sexuality. However, this aspect of xenomelia continues to be investigated. A recent study found that >70% of individuals with xenomelia are at least partially motivated by the perceived enhancement in sexual gratification.¹⁰ Individuals with this motivation are predominantly male, homosexual, come from a religious background, and are far more likely to self-amputate.¹⁰ Mr. H admitted that he is sexually attracted to amputees, and while he had no complaints about his sex life, he felt it could only reach the highest levels of gratification if he were an amputee.

It is reasonable to posit that there is a genetic mechanism that creates a cortical template of one’s body, and this template connects with the limbic system, encoding a visual preference for and attraction to one’s own idealized and preferred body morphology that includes an amputated limb.¹¹ Therefore, if Mr. H sees himself as an amputee, it would be reasonable for him to identify with and be attracted to other amputees. However, Mr. H is clearly not preoccupied with sexuality, and believes that heightened sexual gratification would be an ancillary bonus, and not the main objective, of amputation.

Continue to: Most individuals who have particpated in research studies about xenomelia tend to...

Most individuals who have participated in research studies about xenomelia tend to be older, mainly in their 60s. This is particularly true of individuals who go through with amputation. At some point, the need for a person to invoke their autonomy, alleviate their debilitation, and fulfill their desire may supersede their aversion to physical disability and social ridicule. At this stage in his life, Mr. H can’t commit to going forward with the amputation. However, he regards the likelihood of undergoing amputation to be quite high. He made initial inquiries to find a surgeon who would be willing to perform the procedure. Given that he has found people with xenomelia who have undergone amputation, he will likely will be able find a surgeon to perform the procedure. Mr. H reports that just about everyone he has ever known with xenomelia who underwent amputation is completely satisfied with their decision, even years later. He has come across only one person who regretted the amputation, and he believes that person was likely suffering from other psychiatric issues, and did not have true xenomelia.

In the mind of an individual with xenomelia, the desire for amputation is separate from a desire to be disabled. Mr. H is mindful of the assumed irrationality of removing a healthy but “alien” limb to replace it with a prosthetic limb that is equally alien. The perceived irony is not lost on him. He values his mobility, and has no desire to use crutches, a wheelchair, or any other ambulatory tool. This is consistent with most individuals with xenomelia, who are neither motived by the desire to flaunt their amputated limb, nor by the sympathy they might receive from others by endorsing impaired mobility. They don’t consider themselves disabled. On the contrary, for them, amputation is a much-desired enhancement to their health and well-being.

Increased opportunities for research

The internet, social media, and even peer-reviewed medical journals offer ever-increasing opportunities for individuals with xenomelia, such as Mr. H, to have their story told, regardless of whether they choose to identify themselves or remain anonymous. There are no published data about the prevalence of xenomelia, but it is almost certainly rare. However, if Mr. H was able to meet multiple people with xeno­melia in his own city and form a supportive community with them, then perhaps it isn’t exactly as rare as one might initially assume. People with xenomelia may tend to look for each other, hoping those with the same condition might show them the greatest empathy.

From Mr. H’s experience, it appears that it would be possible to locate a sufficient number of individuals with xenomelia for the purposes of conducting research, which might allow for results with acceptable statistical power. There are plenty of individual patient stories, and by documenting these stories in published literature, it is likely that patterns would emerge and causality might be determined. Such data might be bolstered by a possible strong neurologic corroboration based on what is found via neuroimaging.

Informed research into xenomelia is still in the early stages, and it is clear that there is much left to discover. It is vital that, moving forward, investigation into this condition be thorough and objective, with the goal of alleviating this secretive and debilitating neuropsychiatric condition.

Continue to: Bottom Line

 

 

Bottom Line

Individuals with xenomelia have the persistent belief that one or more of their limbs does not belong to their body but is an alien appendage that should be removed. Patients with this condition may resort to self-amputation or self-mutilation that requires subsequent surgical amputation. Xenomelia may be related to anomalous brain development, with a lack of neural representation of a limb in the right parietal lobe.

Related Resources

• Hilti LM, Hänggi J, Vitacco DA, et al. The desire for healthy limb amputation: structural brain correlates and clinical features of xenomelia. Brain. 2013;136(pt 1):318-329.
• Brugger P, Lenggenhager B, Giummarra MJ. Xenomelia: a social neuroscience view of altered bodily self-consciousness. Front Psychol. 2013;4:204. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00204.

Xenomelia, literally meaning “foreign limb,” is a neuropsychiatric condition in which nonpsychotic individuals have an intense, persistent belief that one or more of their limbs does not belong to their body; instead they regard it as an alien appendage that should be discarded.¹ This unwavering, fixed belief resembles a delusion and is often debilitating to the point where the affected person strongly desires amputation of the unwanted limb. Traditionally, such requests often are denied by the medical community, which may cause an individual who has xenomelia to attempt risky self-amputation, or to injure the limb in a manner that makes subsequent amputation medically necessary.¹

The name for this condition has evolved over the years, depending on the emphasis given to specific characteristics. It was once called apotemnophilia, meaning “love of amputation,” when the condition was believed to be a fetish involving sexual gratification derived from being an amputee.^2,3 The term “body integrity identity disorder” (BIID) was introduced several decades later to incorporate the condition into a broader spectrum of accepted psychiatric pathologies, reasoning that it was the cause of a mismatch between objective and subjective body schema, similar to anorexia nervosa or body dysmorphic disorder.^4,5 This name also served to draw parallels between this condition and gender identity disorder. However, unlike these other disorders, individuals with this condition have sufficient factual insight to know they appear “normal” to others. The newest term, xenomelia, was established to acknowledge the neurologic component of the condition after neuroimaging studies showed structural changes to the right parietal lobe in individuals who desired amputation of their left lower limb, thus linking the part of the brain that processes sensory input from the affected limb.⁶

While particular nuances in symptomatology were modified in formulating these older names, certain hallmark features of xenomelia have remained the same.⁷ The condition starts in early childhood, prior to puberty. Those who have it feel intense distress, and are resigned to the notion that nothing but amputation can alleviate their distress. Xenomelia is overwhelmingly more common in males than females. It is accompanied by nontraditional attitudes about disability, including admiration of amputees and complete apathy and disregard toward the impairment that amputation would cause.

While the data are insufficient to draw a definitive conclusion, the trend in the published literature suggests in xenomelia, the lower left leg is predominantly the limb implicated in the condition, in right-handed individuals.¹

Here, we describe the case of a young man, Mr. H, with xenomelia who contacted us after reading about this condition in a review we recently published.¹ He agreed to allow us to anonymously describe his history and symptoms so that clinicians can recognize and help other individuals with xenomelia. His history may also help stimulate exploration of etiological factors and novel treatment strategies for xenomelia, other than amputation of a healthy limb.

CASE

‘I have this limb that should not be’

Mr. H, age 31, is a white male of Eastern European descent who was born, raised, and resides in a major metropolitan area in the western United States. He is married, college-educated, and currently works as a computer programmer for a prominent technology company. During our conversation via telephone, he exhibits above-average intelligence, appears to be in euthymic mood, and speaks with broad affect. Mr. H displays no psychotic symptoms such as overt delusions, hallucinations, reality distortion, or response to internal stimuli. His past psychiatric history includes attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which was diagnosed at age 6 and treated with appropriate medication under the care of a psychiatrist until age 18, when Mr. H decided to discontinue treatment. He no longer endorses symptoms of ADHD. He has no chronic medical conditions other than season allergies, for which he sometimes takes antihistamines, and occasional exacerbation of sciatica, for which he takes an over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication. Mr. H also has episodic insomnia, which he attributes to job-related stress and working odd hours. He was treated for meningitis as an infant, and underwent a bilateral myringotomy as a young child to treat recurrent ear infections. He has no other surgical history. He was raised in a middle-class Christian household that included both parents, who are still alive, still together, and have no significant psychiatric or medical history. He has no siblings.

Although he lives an ostensibly normal life, Mr. H suffers in silence and secrecy with xenomelia. According to him, there was never a time in his life when he didn’t feel that his left leg was “too long” and he was “walking on a stilt.” He says, “It takes a daily toll on my health and well-being.” He can clearly recall being 4 years old and playing games in which he would pretend to injure his left leg. He says, “When we played ‘make believe,’ the game would always end with something ‘happening’ to [my left leg].” He enjoys outdoor sports like snowboarding and mountain biking, and although he denies self-injurious behavior, he says in the event of an accident, he would prefer to land on his left leg, because it is the part of his body that he considers most “expendable.” One of his most vivid memories of childhood was going shopping with his parents and seeing an older man with only one leg standing on crutches in the parking lot outside the entrance. He remembers feeling “jealous” of this man.

Continue to: Although his parents were not particularly wealthy...

Although his parents were not particularly wealthy, they sent him to a private Christian school for most of his childhood. Mr. H admits that while there he didn’t fit in and felt like an outcast, in part because he didn’t come from the level of wealth of his classmates, and because having ADHD left him isolative and avoidant. “I was always the one going away to take medication,” he explains, and he also developed a hostile attitude. He was suspended from school multiple times for fighting. These years left him tremendously anxious and depressed, and he would often find it therapeutic to sit with his left leg bent underneath him, so as to hide its undesired portion. It was common for him to tie his leg up and stare at himself in the mirror for minutes to hours as a form of stress reduction.

Most of Mr. H’s social circle is composed of friends he has known since childhood, none of whom are aware of his condition. He acknowledges that his feelings are “bizarre in nature” and so he has kept this secret on a “need-to-know” basis out of “fear of rejection, mockery, and damage to my reputation.” Through the years, he has sought out and encountered others with this condition, first anonymously on the internet, then in-person once he gets to know and trust them. He claims to know and be friendly with several people with xenomelia in his own city, some of whom have undergone amputation and are extremely happy with the results. According to Mr. H, there is a community aspect to xenomelia in his city, and people with the condition often meet each other socially. He has revealed his secret to 2 women he dated, including his present wife, who he told 3 years into their relationship. “I was prepared for her to leave me,” he recalls. Although he has never connected the desire for amputation with sexuality, he certainly believes that amputating his left leg would enhance his sex life. “Do I find amputees sexy?” he asks, “I would say yes.” On a 10-point scale, he considers his sex life to be a “7 or 8,” and it would reach 10 if he underwent amputation.

Mr. H has a calendar on which he keeps track of the days when he feels “impaired” by his xenomelia. He marks each day as either “red” or “green.” So far, he does not recognize a pattern of exacerbation. “I have my good days, then I have my bad days,” he laments. “On good days, I think about amputation and where my leg should actually end, but it is something I can quickly push off. On my bad days, I am constantly reminded in one way or another that, yes, I have this limb that should not be.” While he has never sought treatment for this condition from a health care professional, he developed his own therapeutic regimen that includes yoga, hiking, and daily use of cannabis, which “helps take the edge off.” He used alcohol in the past as self-medication, but stopped drinking to excess when it started to disrupt other aspects of his life. According to Mr. H, the goal is to distract himself from the condition, which provides temporary relief. “I find if my mind is more engaged, the amputation thoughts are fewer and less in intensity.” He reports that the months leading up to his wedding were particularly therapeutic because wedding planning provided an excellent distraction.

Overall, his current desire for amputation is steadily increasing. “Lately it has become more of a roller coaster,” he says. “If there’s a safe way to do it, I’ll do it.” An amputation would allow him to “feel good, complete, grounded, and content.” If he were to undergo amputation, he would use a prosthetic in order to retain mobility and keep his physique as discreet as possible. He has made initial inquiries into getting an amputation, saying, “I have heard of rumors of surgeons willing to perform the surgery, for a price. However, I have not completed the ‘vetting process’ to actually come into contact with the surgeons themselves.” Similar to others with xenomelia, he is easily able to draw a line on his leg, exactly where the desired amputation should occur.⁸ For most of his life, that line would have been 2 inches above his knee, but in recent years, the line has drifted lower, to 2 inches below the knee. However, he “wouldn’t mind either” line of amputation. He indicates the area below the desired line is less sensitive to pain than the corresponding part of his right leg, particularly his toes.

Mr. H’s wife is extremely supportive and understanding of her husband’s condition, but is opposed to the possibility of amputation (Box).

Box
Xenomelia: A spouse's perspective

Continue to: Much left to be learned about xenomelia

Much left to be learned about xenomelia

What remains to be discovered about xenomelia falls into 2 areas:

• the possible usefulness of various neuroimaging modalities (morphological MRI, functional MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging) to identify and localize anomalous neural pathways or neuroanatomical foci associated with this condition, such as an aberrantly developed or poorly myelinated right parietal lobe, which houses the limb’s physical proprioception
• a biopsychosocial inquiry into whether there exists a specific combination of a given individual’s organic brain, mind, and environmental interactions that may give rise to this condition, and whether we might detect a prodrome that arises in early childhood. The objective of any research into this condition would be to minimize its effects, if not prevent them altogether.¹

As this case illustrates, xenomelia begins in early childhood, with symptoms being reported in children as young as age 3.⁷ However, no published literature has investigated these early stages. We’ve learned that individuals with xenomelia often can point to key childhood experiences or memories related to seeing people with amputated limbs. They remember feeling a sense of wonder, fascination, or other strong emotion. It may be in this memory that xenomelia is permanently imprinted. This was definitely true for Mr. H, who never knew a time when he didn’t endure some level of debilitation from xenomelia, and distinctly remembers feeling jealous upon seeing a man with the amputated leg standing on crutches in a store parking lot. Although he has come across many amputees in his life, Mr. H says he vividly remembers everything about that particular man in that particular moment, adding “I can still see the clothes he was wearing. I can still see the cars in the parking lot.” That was likely his moment of vivid and powerful imprinting.

Particularly influential changes occur in adolescence, not just in the course of physical development, but in the formulation of self-identity, which involves the inevitable comparison of one’s own appearance to that of others, with heightened awareness of what others might perceive. This phenomenon is known as “the imaginary audience,” and it is often overemphasized in the minds of individuals with xenomelia.⁷ Mr. H is a textbook example of someone acutely aware of his “audience,” suffering from the embarrassment that came from being less wealthy than others at his school, and having to manage his ADHD in plain sight of his classmates, who knew that he required medication. It is no surprise that he felt like an outcast and got suspended for fighting. He would relieve anxiety by tying his leg up and staring at himself in the mirror, finding refuge in front of an audience of one that understood and sympathized with his suffering.

Among the most notorious aspects of this condition is investigation into the possibility of there being a sexual component to the desire for amputation. The notion that the desire is a fetish employed for the purpose of sexual arousal was first propagated by Penthouse magazine in the 1970s.⁹ Learning that xenomelia exists in a child long before sexual maturation—and in an older adult long after sexual drive peaks—suggests the condition is independent of sexuality. However, this aspect of xenomelia continues to be investigated. A recent study found that >70% of individuals with xenomelia are at least partially motivated by the perceived enhancement in sexual gratification.¹⁰ Individuals with this motivation are predominantly male, homosexual, come from a religious background, and are far more likely to self-amputate.¹⁰ Mr. H admitted that he is sexually attracted to amputees, and while he had no complaints about his sex life, he felt it could only reach the highest levels of gratification if he were an amputee.

It is reasonable to posit that there is a genetic mechanism that creates a cortical template of one’s body, and this template connects with the limbic system, encoding a visual preference for and attraction to one’s own idealized and preferred body morphology that includes an amputated limb.¹¹ Therefore, if Mr. H sees himself as an amputee, it would be reasonable for him to identify with and be attracted to other amputees. However, Mr. H is clearly not preoccupied with sexuality, and believes that heightened sexual gratification would be an ancillary bonus, and not the main objective, of amputation.

Continue to: Most individuals who have particpated in research studies about xenomelia tend to...

Most individuals who have participated in research studies about xenomelia tend to be older, mainly in their 60s. This is particularly true of individuals who go through with amputation. At some point, the need for a person to invoke their autonomy, alleviate their debilitation, and fulfill their desire may supersede their aversion to physical disability and social ridicule. At this stage in his life, Mr. H can’t commit to going forward with the amputation. However, he regards the likelihood of undergoing amputation to be quite high. He made initial inquiries to find a surgeon who would be willing to perform the procedure. Given that he has found people with xenomelia who have undergone amputation, he will likely will be able find a surgeon to perform the procedure. Mr. H reports that just about everyone he has ever known with xenomelia who underwent amputation is completely satisfied with their decision, even years later. He has come across only one person who regretted the amputation, and he believes that person was likely suffering from other psychiatric issues, and did not have true xenomelia.

In the mind of an individual with xenomelia, the desire for amputation is separate from a desire to be disabled. Mr. H is mindful of the assumed irrationality of removing a healthy but “alien” limb to replace it with a prosthetic limb that is equally alien. The perceived irony is not lost on him. He values his mobility, and has no desire to use crutches, a wheelchair, or any other ambulatory tool. This is consistent with most individuals with xenomelia, who are neither motived by the desire to flaunt their amputated limb, nor by the sympathy they might receive from others by endorsing impaired mobility. They don’t consider themselves disabled. On the contrary, for them, amputation is a much-desired enhancement to their health and well-being.

Increased opportunities for research

The internet, social media, and even peer-reviewed medical journals offer ever-increasing opportunities for individuals with xenomelia, such as Mr. H, to have their story told, regardless of whether they choose to identify themselves or remain anonymous. There are no published data about the prevalence of xenomelia, but it is almost certainly rare. However, if Mr. H was able to meet multiple people with xeno­melia in his own city and form a supportive community with them, then perhaps it isn’t exactly as rare as one might initially assume. People with xenomelia may tend to look for each other, hoping those with the same condition might show them the greatest empathy.

From Mr. H’s experience, it appears that it would be possible to locate a sufficient number of individuals with xenomelia for the purposes of conducting research, which might allow for results with acceptable statistical power. There are plenty of individual patient stories, and by documenting these stories in published literature, it is likely that patterns would emerge and causality might be determined. Such data might be bolstered by a possible strong neurologic corroboration based on what is found via neuroimaging.

Informed research into xenomelia is still in the early stages, and it is clear that there is much left to discover. It is vital that, moving forward, investigation into this condition be thorough and objective, with the goal of alleviating this secretive and debilitating neuropsychiatric condition.

Continue to: Bottom Line

 

 

Bottom Line

Individuals with xenomelia have the persistent belief that one or more of their limbs does not belong to their body but is an alien appendage that should be removed. Patients with this condition may resort to self-amputation or self-mutilation that requires subsequent surgical amputation. Xenomelia may be related to anomalous brain development, with a lack of neural representation of a limb in the right parietal lobe.

Related Resources

• Hilti LM, Hänggi J, Vitacco DA, et al. The desire for healthy limb amputation: structural brain correlates and clinical features of xenomelia. Brain. 2013;136(pt 1):318-329.
• Brugger P, Lenggenhager B, Giummarra MJ. Xenomelia: a social neuroscience view of altered bodily self-consciousness. Front Psychol. 2013;4:204. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00204.

Xenomelia, literally meaning “foreign limb,” is a neuropsychiatric condition in which nonpsychotic individuals have an intense, persistent belief that one or more of their limbs does not belong to their body; instead they regard it as an alien appendage that should be discarded.¹ This unwavering, fixed belief resembles a delusion and is often debilitating to the point where the affected person strongly desires amputation of the unwanted limb. Traditionally, such requests often are denied by the medical community, which may cause an individual who has xenomelia to attempt risky self-amputation, or to injure the limb in a manner that makes subsequent amputation medically necessary.¹

The name for this condition has evolved over the years, depending on the emphasis given to specific characteristics. It was once called apotemnophilia, meaning “love of amputation,” when the condition was believed to be a fetish involving sexual gratification derived from being an amputee.^2,3 The term “body integrity identity disorder” (BIID) was introduced several decades later to incorporate the condition into a broader spectrum of accepted psychiatric pathologies, reasoning that it was the cause of a mismatch between objective and subjective body schema, similar to anorexia nervosa or body dysmorphic disorder.^4,5 This name also served to draw parallels between this condition and gender identity disorder. However, unlike these other disorders, individuals with this condition have sufficient factual insight to know they appear “normal” to others. The newest term, xenomelia, was established to acknowledge the neurologic component of the condition after neuroimaging studies showed structural changes to the right parietal lobe in individuals who desired amputation of their left lower limb, thus linking the part of the brain that processes sensory input from the affected limb.⁶

While particular nuances in symptomatology were modified in formulating these older names, certain hallmark features of xenomelia have remained the same.⁷ The condition starts in early childhood, prior to puberty. Those who have it feel intense distress, and are resigned to the notion that nothing but amputation can alleviate their distress. Xenomelia is overwhelmingly more common in males than females. It is accompanied by nontraditional attitudes about disability, including admiration of amputees and complete apathy and disregard toward the impairment that amputation would cause.

While the data are insufficient to draw a definitive conclusion, the trend in the published literature suggests in xenomelia, the lower left leg is predominantly the limb implicated in the condition, in right-handed individuals.¹

Here, we describe the case of a young man, Mr. H, with xenomelia who contacted us after reading about this condition in a review we recently published.¹ He agreed to allow us to anonymously describe his history and symptoms so that clinicians can recognize and help other individuals with xenomelia. His history may also help stimulate exploration of etiological factors and novel treatment strategies for xenomelia, other than amputation of a healthy limb.

CASE

‘I have this limb that should not be’

Mr. H, age 31, is a white male of Eastern European descent who was born, raised, and resides in a major metropolitan area in the western United States. He is married, college-educated, and currently works as a computer programmer for a prominent technology company. During our conversation via telephone, he exhibits above-average intelligence, appears to be in euthymic mood, and speaks with broad affect. Mr. H displays no psychotic symptoms such as overt delusions, hallucinations, reality distortion, or response to internal stimuli. His past psychiatric history includes attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which was diagnosed at age 6 and treated with appropriate medication under the care of a psychiatrist until age 18, when Mr. H decided to discontinue treatment. He no longer endorses symptoms of ADHD. He has no chronic medical conditions other than season allergies, for which he sometimes takes antihistamines, and occasional exacerbation of sciatica, for which he takes an over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication. Mr. H also has episodic insomnia, which he attributes to job-related stress and working odd hours. He was treated for meningitis as an infant, and underwent a bilateral myringotomy as a young child to treat recurrent ear infections. He has no other surgical history. He was raised in a middle-class Christian household that included both parents, who are still alive, still together, and have no significant psychiatric or medical history. He has no siblings.

Although he lives an ostensibly normal life, Mr. H suffers in silence and secrecy with xenomelia. According to him, there was never a time in his life when he didn’t feel that his left leg was “too long” and he was “walking on a stilt.” He says, “It takes a daily toll on my health and well-being.” He can clearly recall being 4 years old and playing games in which he would pretend to injure his left leg. He says, “When we played ‘make believe,’ the game would always end with something ‘happening’ to [my left leg].” He enjoys outdoor sports like snowboarding and mountain biking, and although he denies self-injurious behavior, he says in the event of an accident, he would prefer to land on his left leg, because it is the part of his body that he considers most “expendable.” One of his most vivid memories of childhood was going shopping with his parents and seeing an older man with only one leg standing on crutches in the parking lot outside the entrance. He remembers feeling “jealous” of this man.

Continue to: Although his parents were not particularly wealthy...

Although his parents were not particularly wealthy, they sent him to a private Christian school for most of his childhood. Mr. H admits that while there he didn’t fit in and felt like an outcast, in part because he didn’t come from the level of wealth of his classmates, and because having ADHD left him isolative and avoidant. “I was always the one going away to take medication,” he explains, and he also developed a hostile attitude. He was suspended from school multiple times for fighting. These years left him tremendously anxious and depressed, and he would often find it therapeutic to sit with his left leg bent underneath him, so as to hide its undesired portion. It was common for him to tie his leg up and stare at himself in the mirror for minutes to hours as a form of stress reduction.

Most of Mr. H’s social circle is composed of friends he has known since childhood, none of whom are aware of his condition. He acknowledges that his feelings are “bizarre in nature” and so he has kept this secret on a “need-to-know” basis out of “fear of rejection, mockery, and damage to my reputation.” Through the years, he has sought out and encountered others with this condition, first anonymously on the internet, then in-person once he gets to know and trust them. He claims to know and be friendly with several people with xenomelia in his own city, some of whom have undergone amputation and are extremely happy with the results. According to Mr. H, there is a community aspect to xenomelia in his city, and people with the condition often meet each other socially. He has revealed his secret to 2 women he dated, including his present wife, who he told 3 years into their relationship. “I was prepared for her to leave me,” he recalls. Although he has never connected the desire for amputation with sexuality, he certainly believes that amputating his left leg would enhance his sex life. “Do I find amputees sexy?” he asks, “I would say yes.” On a 10-point scale, he considers his sex life to be a “7 or 8,” and it would reach 10 if he underwent amputation.

Mr. H has a calendar on which he keeps track of the days when he feels “impaired” by his xenomelia. He marks each day as either “red” or “green.” So far, he does not recognize a pattern of exacerbation. “I have my good days, then I have my bad days,” he laments. “On good days, I think about amputation and where my leg should actually end, but it is something I can quickly push off. On my bad days, I am constantly reminded in one way or another that, yes, I have this limb that should not be.” While he has never sought treatment for this condition from a health care professional, he developed his own therapeutic regimen that includes yoga, hiking, and daily use of cannabis, which “helps take the edge off.” He used alcohol in the past as self-medication, but stopped drinking to excess when it started to disrupt other aspects of his life. According to Mr. H, the goal is to distract himself from the condition, which provides temporary relief. “I find if my mind is more engaged, the amputation thoughts are fewer and less in intensity.” He reports that the months leading up to his wedding were particularly therapeutic because wedding planning provided an excellent distraction.

Overall, his current desire for amputation is steadily increasing. “Lately it has become more of a roller coaster,” he says. “If there’s a safe way to do it, I’ll do it.” An amputation would allow him to “feel good, complete, grounded, and content.” If he were to undergo amputation, he would use a prosthetic in order to retain mobility and keep his physique as discreet as possible. He has made initial inquiries into getting an amputation, saying, “I have heard of rumors of surgeons willing to perform the surgery, for a price. However, I have not completed the ‘vetting process’ to actually come into contact with the surgeons themselves.” Similar to others with xenomelia, he is easily able to draw a line on his leg, exactly where the desired amputation should occur.⁸ For most of his life, that line would have been 2 inches above his knee, but in recent years, the line has drifted lower, to 2 inches below the knee. However, he “wouldn’t mind either” line of amputation. He indicates the area below the desired line is less sensitive to pain than the corresponding part of his right leg, particularly his toes.

Mr. H’s wife is extremely supportive and understanding of her husband’s condition, but is opposed to the possibility of amputation (Box).

Box
Xenomelia: A spouse's perspective

Continue to: Much left to be learned about xenomelia

Much left to be learned about xenomelia

What remains to be discovered about xenomelia falls into 2 areas:

• the possible usefulness of various neuroimaging modalities (morphological MRI, functional MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging) to identify and localize anomalous neural pathways or neuroanatomical foci associated with this condition, such as an aberrantly developed or poorly myelinated right parietal lobe, which houses the limb’s physical proprioception
• a biopsychosocial inquiry into whether there exists a specific combination of a given individual’s organic brain, mind, and environmental interactions that may give rise to this condition, and whether we might detect a prodrome that arises in early childhood. The objective of any research into this condition would be to minimize its effects, if not prevent them altogether.¹

As this case illustrates, xenomelia begins in early childhood, with symptoms being reported in children as young as age 3.⁷ However, no published literature has investigated these early stages. We’ve learned that individuals with xenomelia often can point to key childhood experiences or memories related to seeing people with amputated limbs. They remember feeling a sense of wonder, fascination, or other strong emotion. It may be in this memory that xenomelia is permanently imprinted. This was definitely true for Mr. H, who never knew a time when he didn’t endure some level of debilitation from xenomelia, and distinctly remembers feeling jealous upon seeing a man with the amputated leg standing on crutches in a store parking lot. Although he has come across many amputees in his life, Mr. H says he vividly remembers everything about that particular man in that particular moment, adding “I can still see the clothes he was wearing. I can still see the cars in the parking lot.” That was likely his moment of vivid and powerful imprinting.

Particularly influential changes occur in adolescence, not just in the course of physical development, but in the formulation of self-identity, which involves the inevitable comparison of one’s own appearance to that of others, with heightened awareness of what others might perceive. This phenomenon is known as “the imaginary audience,” and it is often overemphasized in the minds of individuals with xenomelia.⁷ Mr. H is a textbook example of someone acutely aware of his “audience,” suffering from the embarrassment that came from being less wealthy than others at his school, and having to manage his ADHD in plain sight of his classmates, who knew that he required medication. It is no surprise that he felt like an outcast and got suspended for fighting. He would relieve anxiety by tying his leg up and staring at himself in the mirror, finding refuge in front of an audience of one that understood and sympathized with his suffering.

Among the most notorious aspects of this condition is investigation into the possibility of there being a sexual component to the desire for amputation. The notion that the desire is a fetish employed for the purpose of sexual arousal was first propagated by Penthouse magazine in the 1970s.⁹ Learning that xenomelia exists in a child long before sexual maturation—and in an older adult long after sexual drive peaks—suggests the condition is independent of sexuality. However, this aspect of xenomelia continues to be investigated. A recent study found that >70% of individuals with xenomelia are at least partially motivated by the perceived enhancement in sexual gratification.¹⁰ Individuals with this motivation are predominantly male, homosexual, come from a religious background, and are far more likely to self-amputate.¹⁰ Mr. H admitted that he is sexually attracted to amputees, and while he had no complaints about his sex life, he felt it could only reach the highest levels of gratification if he were an amputee.

It is reasonable to posit that there is a genetic mechanism that creates a cortical template of one’s body, and this template connects with the limbic system, encoding a visual preference for and attraction to one’s own idealized and preferred body morphology that includes an amputated limb.¹¹ Therefore, if Mr. H sees himself as an amputee, it would be reasonable for him to identify with and be attracted to other amputees. However, Mr. H is clearly not preoccupied with sexuality, and believes that heightened sexual gratification would be an ancillary bonus, and not the main objective, of amputation.

Continue to: Most individuals who have particpated in research studies about xenomelia tend to...

Most individuals who have participated in research studies about xenomelia tend to be older, mainly in their 60s. This is particularly true of individuals who go through with amputation. At some point, the need for a person to invoke their autonomy, alleviate their debilitation, and fulfill their desire may supersede their aversion to physical disability and social ridicule. At this stage in his life, Mr. H can’t commit to going forward with the amputation. However, he regards the likelihood of undergoing amputation to be quite high. He made initial inquiries to find a surgeon who would be willing to perform the procedure. Given that he has found people with xenomelia who have undergone amputation, he will likely will be able find a surgeon to perform the procedure. Mr. H reports that just about everyone he has ever known with xenomelia who underwent amputation is completely satisfied with their decision, even years later. He has come across only one person who regretted the amputation, and he believes that person was likely suffering from other psychiatric issues, and did not have true xenomelia.

In the mind of an individual with xenomelia, the desire for amputation is separate from a desire to be disabled. Mr. H is mindful of the assumed irrationality of removing a healthy but “alien” limb to replace it with a prosthetic limb that is equally alien. The perceived irony is not lost on him. He values his mobility, and has no desire to use crutches, a wheelchair, or any other ambulatory tool. This is consistent with most individuals with xenomelia, who are neither motived by the desire to flaunt their amputated limb, nor by the sympathy they might receive from others by endorsing impaired mobility. They don’t consider themselves disabled. On the contrary, for them, amputation is a much-desired enhancement to their health and well-being.

Increased opportunities for research

The internet, social media, and even peer-reviewed medical journals offer ever-increasing opportunities for individuals with xenomelia, such as Mr. H, to have their story told, regardless of whether they choose to identify themselves or remain anonymous. There are no published data about the prevalence of xenomelia, but it is almost certainly rare. However, if Mr. H was able to meet multiple people with xeno­melia in his own city and form a supportive community with them, then perhaps it isn’t exactly as rare as one might initially assume. People with xenomelia may tend to look for each other, hoping those with the same condition might show them the greatest empathy.

From Mr. H’s experience, it appears that it would be possible to locate a sufficient number of individuals with xenomelia for the purposes of conducting research, which might allow for results with acceptable statistical power. There are plenty of individual patient stories, and by documenting these stories in published literature, it is likely that patterns would emerge and causality might be determined. Such data might be bolstered by a possible strong neurologic corroboration based on what is found via neuroimaging.

Informed research into xenomelia is still in the early stages, and it is clear that there is much left to discover. It is vital that, moving forward, investigation into this condition be thorough and objective, with the goal of alleviating this secretive and debilitating neuropsychiatric condition.

Continue to: Bottom Line

 

 

Bottom Line

Individuals with xenomelia have the persistent belief that one or more of their limbs does not belong to their body but is an alien appendage that should be removed. Patients with this condition may resort to self-amputation or self-mutilation that requires subsequent surgical amputation. Xenomelia may be related to anomalous brain development, with a lack of neural representation of a limb in the right parietal lobe.

Related Resources

• Hilti LM, Hänggi J, Vitacco DA, et al. The desire for healthy limb amputation: structural brain correlates and clinical features of xenomelia. Brain. 2013;136(pt 1):318-329.
• Brugger P, Lenggenhager B, Giummarra MJ. Xenomelia: a social neuroscience view of altered bodily self-consciousness. Front Psychol. 2013;4:204. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00204.

We live in a world of acronyms. OMG, GOAT, and the like are ubiquitous on social media and increasingly sprinkled into more traditional journalistic formats. But if you’re a PA, the most important acronym for at least the past two years has been OTP—optimal team practice.

In my February 2017 editorial, I opined on the related concept of full practice authority (FPA), discussing the hurdles the NP and PA professions face to achieve this goal (Clinician Reviews. 2017;27[2]:12-14). Both professions, now more than a half-century old, assert that they have demonstrated, through practice and research, a commitment to competent, quality health care. In recent years, these assertions have been increasingly centered around acquiring more autonomy and responsibility—what NPs refer to as the ability to practice to the fullest extent of their education and training. As a profession, the NPs have done an excellent job of breaking down unnecessary barriers to their practice.

PAs, however, continue to have challenges with this concept. To address this, a mere three months after my FPA editorial, the House of Delegates of the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) adopted OTP as a policy. The Academy says OTP is designed to increase access to care and help align the PA profession with modern societal health care needs.¹ While the AAPA’s Guidelines for State Regulation of PAs continue to emphasize a commitment to team-based care, the OTP policy calls for changes in statutes and regulations that will

• Allow PAs to practice without a formal agreement with a particular physician
• Create separate majority-PA regulatory boards (or give authority to boards comprised of PAs and physicians who practice with PAs), and
• Allow PAs to be directly reimbursed by all public and private insurers. (PAs continue to be the only health care professionals who bill Medicare but are not entitled to direct reimbursement.)

These changes encourage PAs to practice to the full extent of their training and remove restrictions that currently obstruct delivery of care.^1,2 Yet there are unintended consequences as the profession pursues this path.

The Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA), while supporting most of the OTP policy, has raised concerns about changing curricula to reflect increased autonomy, which would require longer educational programs and incur higher costs for students.³ A significant part of PA education for the past half-century has been the social integration into the health care realm with physicians. There is also concern that changes to accommodate OTP might ultimately lead to a requirement for PAs to have a doctorate degree in order to practice—although not everyone sees that as a drawback!

Proponents of OTP, on the other hand, insist that times have changed and the profession must change with them—or at least, the rules governing the profession must be amended to reflect practical realities. AAPA leaders believe that physician oversight provisions are no longer necessary, and that PAs must acclimate to the changing health care marketplace to solidify the future of the profession and meet the needs of patients.

Continue to: Barriers to PA recruitment continue to...

Barriers to PA recruitment continue to exist as a result of statutory requirements. In today’s health care system, physicians are more likely to be employed by a large institution. Because of this, they may no longer see a financial benefit to entering into a formal agreement with a PA, which is currently required by statute for PAs to practice. Furthermore, as PAs and physicians increasingly practice in groups, the requirement for PAs to have an agreement with a specific physician is challenging to manage and places all providers involved at risk for disciplinary action for administrative infractions unrelated to patient care or outcomes.

Advocates for OTP also emphasize the perception that our NP colleagues are preferentially hired over PAs. In 22 states and the District of Columbia, NPs are allowed to practice without a collaborative agreement with a specific physician, anecdotally making them easier to hire.⁴ Even in states where NPs do not have FPA, the perception that hiring an NP is less burdensome than hiring a PA often exists. If accurate, these reports suggest PAs are at a disadvantage relative to NPs, resulting in lost opportunities for employment and advancement. (At least one study—based on a survey of members of the American College of Emergency Physicians council, who have direct experience in hiring NPs and PAs—demonstrated no differences in hiring preferences between the two professions. The same survey also revealed wide variability in supervisory requirements, however.⁵)

By recommending the elimination of the requirement for PAs to have an agreement with a specific physician in order to practice, AAPA is in effect broadening an evolution already occurring at the state level. In 2016, Michigan removed the supervisory requirement and repealed the stipulation of physician responsibility for PA-provided care; PAs in Michigan now practice with a “participating physician.” In 2017, New Mexico amended its Medical Practice Act to allow PAs who practice primary care to collaborate with a physician, while PAs who practice specialty care must be supervised by a physician.⁶ Illinois recently signed a 10-year extension of the state’s PA Practice Act that also better reflects the relationship between PAs and physicians, substituting “collaborating physician” for “supervising physician.”⁷ West Virginia has also adopted legislation referring to the physician/PA relationship as a “collaboration” (terminology Alaska has used since the 1980s).

In supporting the recent changes in Illinois, Dr. Nestor Ramirez, President of the Illinois State Medical Society, noted that “Patients are best served by physician-led teams of professionals practicing within the scope of their licensure, and physicians work collaboratively with PAs and other allied healthcare professionals to ensure that the care provided is of the highest quality.” Changing the terminology to collaboration, he added, simply “brings the language of the Physician Assistant Practice Act in line with that of other licensure acts.”⁷

Perhaps the larger challenge in implementing OTP will be achieving this level of support from all our physician colleagues. In a small survey on this topic conducted by researchers at the Hofstra Northwell School of Graduate Nursing and Physician Assistant Studies, nearly 80% of physician respondents had no previous knowledge of OTP. The majority (62.8%) agreed with the notion that PAs are committed to team practice (first component of OTP); however, less than half of the respondents (47.3%) said they would support OTP policy. The authors concluded that OTP advocacy efforts should target physician awareness and support.⁸

Continue to: One thing is clear...

One thing is clear: the OTP train has left the proverbial station. My concern is: Are we on the right track, with the right strategic plan, and with the right people on board? In my opinion, we need to turn to our professional organizational leaders and ask them to carefully evaluate all the unintended consequences of OTP and outline a carefully thought-out plan for the next decade of PA practice. While state efforts are thus far focused on amending supervisory requirements, I think we would be best served focusing on the development of PA-specific regulatory boards (currently, only five states have one). In the long term, this would make the profession responsible for its own practice regulations.

There is no doubt that we must find appropriate responses to the changing practice environment. As we work toward professional solutions, we must take into consideration the needs of all stakeholders, including our physician colleagues, PA educators, PA regulators, current and future students, and patients. How do we best partner with them—and with our NP colleagues—for the sake of continuity of patient care? Send your ideas to me at [email protected].

We live in a world of acronyms. OMG, GOAT, and the like are ubiquitous on social media and increasingly sprinkled into more traditional journalistic formats. But if you’re a PA, the most important acronym for at least the past two years has been OTP—optimal team practice.

In my February 2017 editorial, I opined on the related concept of full practice authority (FPA), discussing the hurdles the NP and PA professions face to achieve this goal (Clinician Reviews. 2017;27[2]:12-14). Both professions, now more than a half-century old, assert that they have demonstrated, through practice and research, a commitment to competent, quality health care. In recent years, these assertions have been increasingly centered around acquiring more autonomy and responsibility—what NPs refer to as the ability to practice to the fullest extent of their education and training. As a profession, the NPs have done an excellent job of breaking down unnecessary barriers to their practice.

PAs, however, continue to have challenges with this concept. To address this, a mere three months after my FPA editorial, the House of Delegates of the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) adopted OTP as a policy. The Academy says OTP is designed to increase access to care and help align the PA profession with modern societal health care needs.¹ While the AAPA’s Guidelines for State Regulation of PAs continue to emphasize a commitment to team-based care, the OTP policy calls for changes in statutes and regulations that will

• Allow PAs to practice without a formal agreement with a particular physician
• Create separate majority-PA regulatory boards (or give authority to boards comprised of PAs and physicians who practice with PAs), and
• Allow PAs to be directly reimbursed by all public and private insurers. (PAs continue to be the only health care professionals who bill Medicare but are not entitled to direct reimbursement.)

These changes encourage PAs to practice to the full extent of their training and remove restrictions that currently obstruct delivery of care.^1,2 Yet there are unintended consequences as the profession pursues this path.

The Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA), while supporting most of the OTP policy, has raised concerns about changing curricula to reflect increased autonomy, which would require longer educational programs and incur higher costs for students.³ A significant part of PA education for the past half-century has been the social integration into the health care realm with physicians. There is also concern that changes to accommodate OTP might ultimately lead to a requirement for PAs to have a doctorate degree in order to practice—although not everyone sees that as a drawback!

Proponents of OTP, on the other hand, insist that times have changed and the profession must change with them—or at least, the rules governing the profession must be amended to reflect practical realities. AAPA leaders believe that physician oversight provisions are no longer necessary, and that PAs must acclimate to the changing health care marketplace to solidify the future of the profession and meet the needs of patients.

Continue to: Barriers to PA recruitment continue to...

Barriers to PA recruitment continue to exist as a result of statutory requirements. In today’s health care system, physicians are more likely to be employed by a large institution. Because of this, they may no longer see a financial benefit to entering into a formal agreement with a PA, which is currently required by statute for PAs to practice. Furthermore, as PAs and physicians increasingly practice in groups, the requirement for PAs to have an agreement with a specific physician is challenging to manage and places all providers involved at risk for disciplinary action for administrative infractions unrelated to patient care or outcomes.

Advocates for OTP also emphasize the perception that our NP colleagues are preferentially hired over PAs. In 22 states and the District of Columbia, NPs are allowed to practice without a collaborative agreement with a specific physician, anecdotally making them easier to hire.⁴ Even in states where NPs do not have FPA, the perception that hiring an NP is less burdensome than hiring a PA often exists. If accurate, these reports suggest PAs are at a disadvantage relative to NPs, resulting in lost opportunities for employment and advancement. (At least one study—based on a survey of members of the American College of Emergency Physicians council, who have direct experience in hiring NPs and PAs—demonstrated no differences in hiring preferences between the two professions. The same survey also revealed wide variability in supervisory requirements, however.⁵)

By recommending the elimination of the requirement for PAs to have an agreement with a specific physician in order to practice, AAPA is in effect broadening an evolution already occurring at the state level. In 2016, Michigan removed the supervisory requirement and repealed the stipulation of physician responsibility for PA-provided care; PAs in Michigan now practice with a “participating physician.” In 2017, New Mexico amended its Medical Practice Act to allow PAs who practice primary care to collaborate with a physician, while PAs who practice specialty care must be supervised by a physician.⁶ Illinois recently signed a 10-year extension of the state’s PA Practice Act that also better reflects the relationship between PAs and physicians, substituting “collaborating physician” for “supervising physician.”⁷ West Virginia has also adopted legislation referring to the physician/PA relationship as a “collaboration” (terminology Alaska has used since the 1980s).

In supporting the recent changes in Illinois, Dr. Nestor Ramirez, President of the Illinois State Medical Society, noted that “Patients are best served by physician-led teams of professionals practicing within the scope of their licensure, and physicians work collaboratively with PAs and other allied healthcare professionals to ensure that the care provided is of the highest quality.” Changing the terminology to collaboration, he added, simply “brings the language of the Physician Assistant Practice Act in line with that of other licensure acts.”⁷

Perhaps the larger challenge in implementing OTP will be achieving this level of support from all our physician colleagues. In a small survey on this topic conducted by researchers at the Hofstra Northwell School of Graduate Nursing and Physician Assistant Studies, nearly 80% of physician respondents had no previous knowledge of OTP. The majority (62.8%) agreed with the notion that PAs are committed to team practice (first component of OTP); however, less than half of the respondents (47.3%) said they would support OTP policy. The authors concluded that OTP advocacy efforts should target physician awareness and support.⁸

Continue to: One thing is clear...

One thing is clear: the OTP train has left the proverbial station. My concern is: Are we on the right track, with the right strategic plan, and with the right people on board? In my opinion, we need to turn to our professional organizational leaders and ask them to carefully evaluate all the unintended consequences of OTP and outline a carefully thought-out plan for the next decade of PA practice. While state efforts are thus far focused on amending supervisory requirements, I think we would be best served focusing on the development of PA-specific regulatory boards (currently, only five states have one). In the long term, this would make the profession responsible for its own practice regulations.

There is no doubt that we must find appropriate responses to the changing practice environment. As we work toward professional solutions, we must take into consideration the needs of all stakeholders, including our physician colleagues, PA educators, PA regulators, current and future students, and patients. How do we best partner with them—and with our NP colleagues—for the sake of continuity of patient care? Send your ideas to me at [email protected].

We live in a world of acronyms. OMG, GOAT, and the like are ubiquitous on social media and increasingly sprinkled into more traditional journalistic formats. But if you’re a PA, the most important acronym for at least the past two years has been OTP—optimal team practice.

In my February 2017 editorial, I opined on the related concept of full practice authority (FPA), discussing the hurdles the NP and PA professions face to achieve this goal (Clinician Reviews. 2017;27[2]:12-14). Both professions, now more than a half-century old, assert that they have demonstrated, through practice and research, a commitment to competent, quality health care. In recent years, these assertions have been increasingly centered around acquiring more autonomy and responsibility—what NPs refer to as the ability to practice to the fullest extent of their education and training. As a profession, the NPs have done an excellent job of breaking down unnecessary barriers to their practice.

PAs, however, continue to have challenges with this concept. To address this, a mere three months after my FPA editorial, the House of Delegates of the American Academy of PAs (AAPA) adopted OTP as a policy. The Academy says OTP is designed to increase access to care and help align the PA profession with modern societal health care needs.¹ While the AAPA’s Guidelines for State Regulation of PAs continue to emphasize a commitment to team-based care, the OTP policy calls for changes in statutes and regulations that will

• Allow PAs to practice without a formal agreement with a particular physician
• Create separate majority-PA regulatory boards (or give authority to boards comprised of PAs and physicians who practice with PAs), and
• Allow PAs to be directly reimbursed by all public and private insurers. (PAs continue to be the only health care professionals who bill Medicare but are not entitled to direct reimbursement.)

These changes encourage PAs to practice to the full extent of their training and remove restrictions that currently obstruct delivery of care.^1,2 Yet there are unintended consequences as the profession pursues this path.

The Physician Assistant Education Association (PAEA), while supporting most of the OTP policy, has raised concerns about changing curricula to reflect increased autonomy, which would require longer educational programs and incur higher costs for students.³ A significant part of PA education for the past half-century has been the social integration into the health care realm with physicians. There is also concern that changes to accommodate OTP might ultimately lead to a requirement for PAs to have a doctorate degree in order to practice—although not everyone sees that as a drawback!

Proponents of OTP, on the other hand, insist that times have changed and the profession must change with them—or at least, the rules governing the profession must be amended to reflect practical realities. AAPA leaders believe that physician oversight provisions are no longer necessary, and that PAs must acclimate to the changing health care marketplace to solidify the future of the profession and meet the needs of patients.

Continue to: Barriers to PA recruitment continue to...

Barriers to PA recruitment continue to exist as a result of statutory requirements. In today’s health care system, physicians are more likely to be employed by a large institution. Because of this, they may no longer see a financial benefit to entering into a formal agreement with a PA, which is currently required by statute for PAs to practice. Furthermore, as PAs and physicians increasingly practice in groups, the requirement for PAs to have an agreement with a specific physician is challenging to manage and places all providers involved at risk for disciplinary action for administrative infractions unrelated to patient care or outcomes.

Advocates for OTP also emphasize the perception that our NP colleagues are preferentially hired over PAs. In 22 states and the District of Columbia, NPs are allowed to practice without a collaborative agreement with a specific physician, anecdotally making them easier to hire.⁴ Even in states where NPs do not have FPA, the perception that hiring an NP is less burdensome than hiring a PA often exists. If accurate, these reports suggest PAs are at a disadvantage relative to NPs, resulting in lost opportunities for employment and advancement. (At least one study—based on a survey of members of the American College of Emergency Physicians council, who have direct experience in hiring NPs and PAs—demonstrated no differences in hiring preferences between the two professions. The same survey also revealed wide variability in supervisory requirements, however.⁵)

By recommending the elimination of the requirement for PAs to have an agreement with a specific physician in order to practice, AAPA is in effect broadening an evolution already occurring at the state level. In 2016, Michigan removed the supervisory requirement and repealed the stipulation of physician responsibility for PA-provided care; PAs in Michigan now practice with a “participating physician.” In 2017, New Mexico amended its Medical Practice Act to allow PAs who practice primary care to collaborate with a physician, while PAs who practice specialty care must be supervised by a physician.⁶ Illinois recently signed a 10-year extension of the state’s PA Practice Act that also better reflects the relationship between PAs and physicians, substituting “collaborating physician” for “supervising physician.”⁷ West Virginia has also adopted legislation referring to the physician/PA relationship as a “collaboration” (terminology Alaska has used since the 1980s).

In supporting the recent changes in Illinois, Dr. Nestor Ramirez, President of the Illinois State Medical Society, noted that “Patients are best served by physician-led teams of professionals practicing within the scope of their licensure, and physicians work collaboratively with PAs and other allied healthcare professionals to ensure that the care provided is of the highest quality.” Changing the terminology to collaboration, he added, simply “brings the language of the Physician Assistant Practice Act in line with that of other licensure acts.”⁷

Perhaps the larger challenge in implementing OTP will be achieving this level of support from all our physician colleagues. In a small survey on this topic conducted by researchers at the Hofstra Northwell School of Graduate Nursing and Physician Assistant Studies, nearly 80% of physician respondents had no previous knowledge of OTP. The majority (62.8%) agreed with the notion that PAs are committed to team practice (first component of OTP); however, less than half of the respondents (47.3%) said they would support OTP policy. The authors concluded that OTP advocacy efforts should target physician awareness and support.⁸

Continue to: One thing is clear...

One thing is clear: the OTP train has left the proverbial station. My concern is: Are we on the right track, with the right strategic plan, and with the right people on board? In my opinion, we need to turn to our professional organizational leaders and ask them to carefully evaluate all the unintended consequences of OTP and outline a carefully thought-out plan for the next decade of PA practice. While state efforts are thus far focused on amending supervisory requirements, I think we would be best served focusing on the development of PA-specific regulatory boards (currently, only five states have one). In the long term, this would make the profession responsible for its own practice regulations.

There is no doubt that we must find appropriate responses to the changing practice environment. As we work toward professional solutions, we must take into consideration the needs of all stakeholders, including our physician colleagues, PA educators, PA regulators, current and future students, and patients. How do we best partner with them—and with our NP colleagues—for the sake of continuity of patient care? Send your ideas to me at [email protected].

Clinical question: Are patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke?

Background: Prior research has identified an association between PFO and risk of stroke. However, little is known about the effect of a preoperatively diagnosed PFO on perioperative stroke risk.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Three Massachusetts hospitals, from January 2007 to December 2015.

Synopsis: The charts of 150,198 adult patients who underwent noncardiac surgery were reviewed for ICD codes for PFO. The primary outcome was perioperative ischemic stroke within 30 days of surgery, as identified via ICD code and subsequent chart review. After they adjusted for confounding variables, the study authors found that patients with PFO had an increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.96-3.63; P less than .001) compared with patients without PFO. These findings were replicated in a propensity score–matched cohort to adjust for baseline differences between PFO and non-PFO groups. Patients with PFO also had a significantly increased risk of large-vessel territory ischemia and more severe neurologic deficits.

Given the observational design, this study could not establish a causal relationship between presence of a PFO and perioperative stroke. While the results support the consideration of PFO as a risk factor for perioperative stroke, research into whether this risk can be mitigated is needed.

Bottom line: Patients with PFO undergoing noncardiac surgery may be at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke.

Citation: Ng PY et al. Association of preoperatively diagnosed patent foramen ovale with perioperative ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):452-62.

Dr. Roy is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and instructor in medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Clinical question: Are patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke?

Background: Prior research has identified an association between PFO and risk of stroke. However, little is known about the effect of a preoperatively diagnosed PFO on perioperative stroke risk.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Three Massachusetts hospitals, from January 2007 to December 2015.

Synopsis: The charts of 150,198 adult patients who underwent noncardiac surgery were reviewed for ICD codes for PFO. The primary outcome was perioperative ischemic stroke within 30 days of surgery, as identified via ICD code and subsequent chart review. After they adjusted for confounding variables, the study authors found that patients with PFO had an increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.96-3.63; P less than .001) compared with patients without PFO. These findings were replicated in a propensity score–matched cohort to adjust for baseline differences between PFO and non-PFO groups. Patients with PFO also had a significantly increased risk of large-vessel territory ischemia and more severe neurologic deficits.

Given the observational design, this study could not establish a causal relationship between presence of a PFO and perioperative stroke. While the results support the consideration of PFO as a risk factor for perioperative stroke, research into whether this risk can be mitigated is needed.

Bottom line: Patients with PFO undergoing noncardiac surgery may be at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke.

Citation: Ng PY et al. Association of preoperatively diagnosed patent foramen ovale with perioperative ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):452-62.

Dr. Roy is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and instructor in medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Clinical question: Are patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke?

Background: Prior research has identified an association between PFO and risk of stroke. However, little is known about the effect of a preoperatively diagnosed PFO on perioperative stroke risk.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Three Massachusetts hospitals, from January 2007 to December 2015.

Synopsis: The charts of 150,198 adult patients who underwent noncardiac surgery were reviewed for ICD codes for PFO. The primary outcome was perioperative ischemic stroke within 30 days of surgery, as identified via ICD code and subsequent chart review. After they adjusted for confounding variables, the study authors found that patients with PFO had an increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.96-3.63; P less than .001) compared with patients without PFO. These findings were replicated in a propensity score–matched cohort to adjust for baseline differences between PFO and non-PFO groups. Patients with PFO also had a significantly increased risk of large-vessel territory ischemia and more severe neurologic deficits.

Given the observational design, this study could not establish a causal relationship between presence of a PFO and perioperative stroke. While the results support the consideration of PFO as a risk factor for perioperative stroke, research into whether this risk can be mitigated is needed.

Bottom line: Patients with PFO undergoing noncardiac surgery may be at increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke.

Citation: Ng PY et al. Association of preoperatively diagnosed patent foramen ovale with perioperative ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):452-62.

Dr. Roy is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and instructor in medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Epizyme, Inc., has announced its decision to stop developing tazemetostat for use as monotherapy or in combination with prednisolone for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

However, tazemetostat is still under investigation as a potential treatment for DLBCL as part of other combination regimens.

Tazemetostat is an EZH2 inhibitor being developed to treat multiple hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

Epizyme has been conducting a phase 1/2 trial of tazemetostat in patients with relapsed and/or refractory DLBCL as well as other B-cell lymphomas and solid tumors (NCT01897571).

The trial includes DLBCL patients with and without EZH2 activating mutations. Some patients were assigned to receive tazemetostat monotherapy, and some were assigned to tazemetostat in combination with prednisolone.

Epizyme has conducted an interim assessment of data from this trial and concluded that the clinical activity observed “is not sufficient to warrant further development of tazemetostat in DLBCL as a monotherapy or in combination with prednisolone.”

Epizyme said it plans to present data from this trial at a medical meeting in the second half of 2018.

The company is still conducting other studies of tazemetostat in patients with DLBCL.

In one study (NCT02889523), Epizyme and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation are evaluating tazemetostat in combination with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone) in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL.

In another study (NCT03028103), Epizyme is evaluating tazemetostat in combination with fluconazole or omeprazole and repaglinide in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, other B-cell lymphomas, or solid tumor malignancies.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Epizyme, Inc., has announced its decision to stop developing tazemetostat for use as monotherapy or in combination with prednisolone for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

However, tazemetostat is still under investigation as a potential treatment for DLBCL as part of other combination regimens.

Tazemetostat is an EZH2 inhibitor being developed to treat multiple hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

Epizyme has been conducting a phase 1/2 trial of tazemetostat in patients with relapsed and/or refractory DLBCL as well as other B-cell lymphomas and solid tumors (NCT01897571).

The trial includes DLBCL patients with and without EZH2 activating mutations. Some patients were assigned to receive tazemetostat monotherapy, and some were assigned to tazemetostat in combination with prednisolone.

Epizyme has conducted an interim assessment of data from this trial and concluded that the clinical activity observed “is not sufficient to warrant further development of tazemetostat in DLBCL as a monotherapy or in combination with prednisolone.”

Epizyme said it plans to present data from this trial at a medical meeting in the second half of 2018.

The company is still conducting other studies of tazemetostat in patients with DLBCL.

In one study (NCT02889523), Epizyme and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation are evaluating tazemetostat in combination with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone) in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL.

In another study (NCT03028103), Epizyme is evaluating tazemetostat in combination with fluconazole or omeprazole and repaglinide in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, other B-cell lymphomas, or solid tumor malignancies.

Micrograph showing DLBCL

Epizyme, Inc., has announced its decision to stop developing tazemetostat for use as monotherapy or in combination with prednisolone for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

However, tazemetostat is still under investigation as a potential treatment for DLBCL as part of other combination regimens.

Tazemetostat is an EZH2 inhibitor being developed to treat multiple hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

Epizyme has been conducting a phase 1/2 trial of tazemetostat in patients with relapsed and/or refractory DLBCL as well as other B-cell lymphomas and solid tumors (NCT01897571).

The trial includes DLBCL patients with and without EZH2 activating mutations. Some patients were assigned to receive tazemetostat monotherapy, and some were assigned to tazemetostat in combination with prednisolone.

Epizyme has conducted an interim assessment of data from this trial and concluded that the clinical activity observed “is not sufficient to warrant further development of tazemetostat in DLBCL as a monotherapy or in combination with prednisolone.”

Epizyme said it plans to present data from this trial at a medical meeting in the second half of 2018.

The company is still conducting other studies of tazemetostat in patients with DLBCL.

In one study (NCT02889523), Epizyme and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation are evaluating tazemetostat in combination with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone) in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL.

In another study (NCT03028103), Epizyme is evaluating tazemetostat in combination with fluconazole or omeprazole and repaglinide in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, other B-cell lymphomas, or solid tumor malignancies.

Image by Lance Liotta

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) has recommended that PCM-075 receive orphan drug designation as a treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

PCM-075 is an oral adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of the serine/threonine Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) enzyme, which is overexpressed in hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

The COMP’s recommendation for PCM-075 is expected to be adopted by the European Commission at the end of this month.

Orphan drug designation in Europe is available to companies developing products intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects fewer than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union (EU).

The designation allows for financial and regulatory incentives that include 10 years of marketing exclusivity in the EU after product approval, eligibility for conditional marketing authorization, protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency at reduced fees during the product development phase, and direct access to centralized marketing authorization in the EU.

PCM-075 research

PCM-075 only targets the PLK1 isoform (not PLK2 or PLK3) and has a 24-hour drug half-life with reversible, on-target hematologic toxicities, according to Trovagene, Inc., the company developing PCM-075.

Trovagene believes that PCM-075’s reversible, on-target activity, combined with an improved dose/scheduling protocol, could mean that PCM-075 will improve upon long-term outcomes observed in previous studies with a PLK inhibitor in AML.

This includes a phase 2 study in which AML patients who received a PLK inhibitor plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) had a higher response rate than patients who received LDAC alone—31% and 13.3%, respectively.

Trovagene said preclinical studies have shown that PCM-075 synergizes with more than 10 drugs used to treat hematologic and solid tumor malignancies. This includes FLT3 and HDAC inhibitors, taxanes, and cytotoxins.

Trovagene is now conducting a phase 1b/2 trial of PCM-075 in combination with standard care (LDAC or decitabine) in patients with AML (NCT03303339).

The company has already completed a phase 1 dose-escalation study of PCM-075 in patients with advanced metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Results from this study were published in Investigational New Drugs.

Image by Lance Liotta

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) has recommended that PCM-075 receive orphan drug designation as a treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

PCM-075 is an oral adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of the serine/threonine Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) enzyme, which is overexpressed in hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

The COMP’s recommendation for PCM-075 is expected to be adopted by the European Commission at the end of this month.

Orphan drug designation in Europe is available to companies developing products intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects fewer than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union (EU).

The designation allows for financial and regulatory incentives that include 10 years of marketing exclusivity in the EU after product approval, eligibility for conditional marketing authorization, protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency at reduced fees during the product development phase, and direct access to centralized marketing authorization in the EU.

PCM-075 research

PCM-075 only targets the PLK1 isoform (not PLK2 or PLK3) and has a 24-hour drug half-life with reversible, on-target hematologic toxicities, according to Trovagene, Inc., the company developing PCM-075.

Trovagene believes that PCM-075’s reversible, on-target activity, combined with an improved dose/scheduling protocol, could mean that PCM-075 will improve upon long-term outcomes observed in previous studies with a PLK inhibitor in AML.

This includes a phase 2 study in which AML patients who received a PLK inhibitor plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) had a higher response rate than patients who received LDAC alone—31% and 13.3%, respectively.

Trovagene said preclinical studies have shown that PCM-075 synergizes with more than 10 drugs used to treat hematologic and solid tumor malignancies. This includes FLT3 and HDAC inhibitors, taxanes, and cytotoxins.

Trovagene is now conducting a phase 1b/2 trial of PCM-075 in combination with standard care (LDAC or decitabine) in patients with AML (NCT03303339).

The company has already completed a phase 1 dose-escalation study of PCM-075 in patients with advanced metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Results from this study were published in Investigational New Drugs.

Image by Lance Liotta

The European Medicines Agency’s Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products (COMP) has recommended that PCM-075 receive orphan drug designation as a treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

PCM-075 is an oral adenosine triphosphate competitive inhibitor of the serine/threonine Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) enzyme, which is overexpressed in hematologic and solid tumor malignancies.

The COMP’s recommendation for PCM-075 is expected to be adopted by the European Commission at the end of this month.

Orphan drug designation in Europe is available to companies developing products intended to treat a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition that affects fewer than 5 in 10,000 people in the European Union (EU).

The designation allows for financial and regulatory incentives that include 10 years of marketing exclusivity in the EU after product approval, eligibility for conditional marketing authorization, protocol assistance from the European Medicines Agency at reduced fees during the product development phase, and direct access to centralized marketing authorization in the EU.

PCM-075 research

PCM-075 only targets the PLK1 isoform (not PLK2 or PLK3) and has a 24-hour drug half-life with reversible, on-target hematologic toxicities, according to Trovagene, Inc., the company developing PCM-075.

Trovagene believes that PCM-075’s reversible, on-target activity, combined with an improved dose/scheduling protocol, could mean that PCM-075 will improve upon long-term outcomes observed in previous studies with a PLK inhibitor in AML.

This includes a phase 2 study in which AML patients who received a PLK inhibitor plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) had a higher response rate than patients who received LDAC alone—31% and 13.3%, respectively.

Trovagene said preclinical studies have shown that PCM-075 synergizes with more than 10 drugs used to treat hematologic and solid tumor malignancies. This includes FLT3 and HDAC inhibitors, taxanes, and cytotoxins.

Trovagene is now conducting a phase 1b/2 trial of PCM-075 in combination with standard care (LDAC or decitabine) in patients with AML (NCT03303339).

The company has already completed a phase 1 dose-escalation study of PCM-075 in patients with advanced metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Results from this study were published in Investigational New Drugs.

An analysis of conditional survival outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has suggested that first-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) can result in improved survival odds over time.

Patients with mRCC treated with a TKI upfront had gradual increases over time in conditional overall survival estimates when compared with baseline survival predictions, a retrospective review has indicated.

Patients who survived at least 36 months after the start of therapy had an estimated 36-month conditional overall survival (OS) rate that was 7.3% higher than the predicted survival at the initiation of therapy, reported Seong Il Seo, MD, PhD, from Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, North Korea, and his colleagues.

The investigators also found that, while predictors of survival changed over time, previous metastasectomy was a key prognosticator of conditional overall survival throughout 36 months of follow-up, they reported in The Journal of Urology.

“To our knowledge, our data are the first to reveal the beneficial role of metastasectomy on conditional OS probabilities with time since an initial survival estimation, particularly in patients at intermediate and poor risk. [Conditional survival] estimates can be beneficial to counsel patients with mRCC about more practical prognoses and helpful to continuously adjust surveillance planning in these patients,” they wrote.

Conditional survival is an analytical method for providing more accurate estimates of how prognoses change over time when patients with aggressive metastatic disease, such as mRCC, are exposed to therapies such as nephrectomy or TKIs.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed records for 1,131 patients with mRCC in the Korean Renal Cancer Study Group database. They calculated conditional OS using a nomogram that indicated the likelihood that a patient would survive an additional number of years given that he or she had already survived a certain number of years. They also created a multivariate regression model to identify predictors of conditional survival over time.

They found that, at all survival times after the start of TKI therapy (6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months), conditional overall survival gradually increased when compared with baseline survival estimates.

“While the actual overall survival rate decreased with time, the 36-month conditional overall survival rate was calculated as 7.3% higher in patients who had already survived 36 months compared to baseline estimations at the time of initial tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment,” they wrote.

In the multivariate model, prognostic factors such as gender, pathologic T stage, and Heng risk classification became nonsignificant over time, but previous metastasectomy remained a significant independent predictor of survival after TKI therapy at all time points except for 18 months.

“This study largely corroborates previous data from the IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium), and it provides useful information on prognostication,” commented Adam B. Weiner, MD, of Northwestern University in Chicago, in a brief accompanying editorial.

The study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology and by a Korea Health Technology R&D Project grant through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in South Korea. No conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Kang M et al. J Urol. 2018 June 22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.030.

 

An analysis of conditional survival outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has suggested that first-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) can result in improved survival odds over time.

Patients with mRCC treated with a TKI upfront had gradual increases over time in conditional overall survival estimates when compared with baseline survival predictions, a retrospective review has indicated.

Patients who survived at least 36 months after the start of therapy had an estimated 36-month conditional overall survival (OS) rate that was 7.3% higher than the predicted survival at the initiation of therapy, reported Seong Il Seo, MD, PhD, from Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, North Korea, and his colleagues.

The investigators also found that, while predictors of survival changed over time, previous metastasectomy was a key prognosticator of conditional overall survival throughout 36 months of follow-up, they reported in The Journal of Urology.

“To our knowledge, our data are the first to reveal the beneficial role of metastasectomy on conditional OS probabilities with time since an initial survival estimation, particularly in patients at intermediate and poor risk. [Conditional survival] estimates can be beneficial to counsel patients with mRCC about more practical prognoses and helpful to continuously adjust surveillance planning in these patients,” they wrote.

Conditional survival is an analytical method for providing more accurate estimates of how prognoses change over time when patients with aggressive metastatic disease, such as mRCC, are exposed to therapies such as nephrectomy or TKIs.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed records for 1,131 patients with mRCC in the Korean Renal Cancer Study Group database. They calculated conditional OS using a nomogram that indicated the likelihood that a patient would survive an additional number of years given that he or she had already survived a certain number of years. They also created a multivariate regression model to identify predictors of conditional survival over time.

They found that, at all survival times after the start of TKI therapy (6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months), conditional overall survival gradually increased when compared with baseline survival estimates.

“While the actual overall survival rate decreased with time, the 36-month conditional overall survival rate was calculated as 7.3% higher in patients who had already survived 36 months compared to baseline estimations at the time of initial tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment,” they wrote.

In the multivariate model, prognostic factors such as gender, pathologic T stage, and Heng risk classification became nonsignificant over time, but previous metastasectomy remained a significant independent predictor of survival after TKI therapy at all time points except for 18 months.

“This study largely corroborates previous data from the IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium), and it provides useful information on prognostication,” commented Adam B. Weiner, MD, of Northwestern University in Chicago, in a brief accompanying editorial.

The study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology and by a Korea Health Technology R&D Project grant through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in South Korea. No conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Kang M et al. J Urol. 2018 June 22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.030.

 

An analysis of conditional survival outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has suggested that first-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) can result in improved survival odds over time.

Patients with mRCC treated with a TKI upfront had gradual increases over time in conditional overall survival estimates when compared with baseline survival predictions, a retrospective review has indicated.

Patients who survived at least 36 months after the start of therapy had an estimated 36-month conditional overall survival (OS) rate that was 7.3% higher than the predicted survival at the initiation of therapy, reported Seong Il Seo, MD, PhD, from Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, North Korea, and his colleagues.

The investigators also found that, while predictors of survival changed over time, previous metastasectomy was a key prognosticator of conditional overall survival throughout 36 months of follow-up, they reported in The Journal of Urology.

“To our knowledge, our data are the first to reveal the beneficial role of metastasectomy on conditional OS probabilities with time since an initial survival estimation, particularly in patients at intermediate and poor risk. [Conditional survival] estimates can be beneficial to counsel patients with mRCC about more practical prognoses and helpful to continuously adjust surveillance planning in these patients,” they wrote.

Conditional survival is an analytical method for providing more accurate estimates of how prognoses change over time when patients with aggressive metastatic disease, such as mRCC, are exposed to therapies such as nephrectomy or TKIs.

The investigators retrospectively reviewed records for 1,131 patients with mRCC in the Korean Renal Cancer Study Group database. They calculated conditional OS using a nomogram that indicated the likelihood that a patient would survive an additional number of years given that he or she had already survived a certain number of years. They also created a multivariate regression model to identify predictors of conditional survival over time.

They found that, at all survival times after the start of TKI therapy (6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months), conditional overall survival gradually increased when compared with baseline survival estimates.

“While the actual overall survival rate decreased with time, the 36-month conditional overall survival rate was calculated as 7.3% higher in patients who had already survived 36 months compared to baseline estimations at the time of initial tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment,” they wrote.

In the multivariate model, prognostic factors such as gender, pathologic T stage, and Heng risk classification became nonsignificant over time, but previous metastasectomy remained a significant independent predictor of survival after TKI therapy at all time points except for 18 months.

“This study largely corroborates previous data from the IMDC (International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium), and it provides useful information on prognostication,” commented Adam B. Weiner, MD, of Northwestern University in Chicago, in a brief accompanying editorial.

The study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Information and Communications Technology and by a Korea Health Technology R&D Project grant through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in South Korea. No conflicts of interest were reported.

SOURCE: Kang M et al. J Urol. 2018 June 22. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.030.

 

SAN FRANCISCO—Patients with chronic migraine are significantly more likely than those with episodic migraine to report that headaches contribute to relationship problems and have a detrimental effect on family life, researchers said at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Negative effects on family life include a delay in having children and having fewer children.

Migraine can detract from many aspects of family life and affect all members of the patient’s family. Dawn C. Buse, PhD, Clinical Professor of Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, New York, and colleagues analyzed data from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) study to understand the effects of episodic and chronic migraine on a person’s relationships and family life.

An Analysis of CaMEO Data

The CaMEO study is a prospective, longitudinal, web-based survey designed to characterize the impact of migraine, among other objectives, in a systematic US sample of people meeting modified ICHD-2R criteria. A total of 19,891 respondents met study criteria, including criteria for migraine, and were invited to complete the Family Burden Module (FBM), which assessed the impact, perception, and emotions related to living with migraine among people with migraine and their family members.

Dr. Buse and colleagues presented the results of migraineurs’ responses to the FBM regarding relationships with spouses or significant others and relationships with children living at home. The investigators stratified migraineurs by episodic migraine (ie, those with fewer than 14 headache days per month) and chronic migraine (ie, those with 15 or more headache days per month). Migraineurs were asked about their current relationship status (ie, in a current relationship or not, living together or not). Questions evaluated how headaches had affected past or current relationships with Likert-type response options that corresponded to degrees of disagreement or agreement. Dr. Buse’s group analyzed items by relationship status, episodic or chronic migraine status, and gender.

Women and Men Were Affected Similarly

In all, 13,064 respondents provided valid data. Of this population, 11,938 (91.4%) had episodic migraine and 1,126 (8.6%) had chronic migraine. Of those not currently in a relationship (n = 3,189), respondents with chronic migraine were significantly more likely to indicate that headaches had contributed to relationship problems (37.0%), compared with patients with episodic migraine (15.0%). Of those in a relationship but not living together (n = 1,323), 43.9% of respondents with chronic migraine indicated that headaches were causing relationship concerns or were preventing a closer relationship, such as moving in together or getting married, compared with 15.8% of patients with episodic migraine. The responses were similar among men (18.0%) and women (17.8%).

About 47% of respondents with chronic migraine reported that headaches have caused one or more previous relationship to end or have other problems, compared with 18.2% of respondents with episodic migraine. Headache contributions to relationship problems (ie, breakup or other difficulties) were similar among men (20.6%) and women (19.9%).

Of those in a relationship and living together (n = 8,127), 78.2% of respondents with chronic migraine agreed that they would be a better partner if they did not have headaches, compared with 46.2% of respondents with episodic migraine. Furthermore, 9.6% of patients with chronic migraine had delayed having children or had fewer children, compared with 2.6% of patients with episodic migraine. The researchers observed no differences between men and women.

SAN FRANCISCO—Patients with chronic migraine are significantly more likely than those with episodic migraine to report that headaches contribute to relationship problems and have a detrimental effect on family life, researchers said at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Negative effects on family life include a delay in having children and having fewer children.

Migraine can detract from many aspects of family life and affect all members of the patient’s family. Dawn C. Buse, PhD, Clinical Professor of Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, New York, and colleagues analyzed data from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) study to understand the effects of episodic and chronic migraine on a person’s relationships and family life.

An Analysis of CaMEO Data

The CaMEO study is a prospective, longitudinal, web-based survey designed to characterize the impact of migraine, among other objectives, in a systematic US sample of people meeting modified ICHD-2R criteria. A total of 19,891 respondents met study criteria, including criteria for migraine, and were invited to complete the Family Burden Module (FBM), which assessed the impact, perception, and emotions related to living with migraine among people with migraine and their family members.

Dr. Buse and colleagues presented the results of migraineurs’ responses to the FBM regarding relationships with spouses or significant others and relationships with children living at home. The investigators stratified migraineurs by episodic migraine (ie, those with fewer than 14 headache days per month) and chronic migraine (ie, those with 15 or more headache days per month). Migraineurs were asked about their current relationship status (ie, in a current relationship or not, living together or not). Questions evaluated how headaches had affected past or current relationships with Likert-type response options that corresponded to degrees of disagreement or agreement. Dr. Buse’s group analyzed items by relationship status, episodic or chronic migraine status, and gender.

Women and Men Were Affected Similarly

In all, 13,064 respondents provided valid data. Of this population, 11,938 (91.4%) had episodic migraine and 1,126 (8.6%) had chronic migraine. Of those not currently in a relationship (n = 3,189), respondents with chronic migraine were significantly more likely to indicate that headaches had contributed to relationship problems (37.0%), compared with patients with episodic migraine (15.0%). Of those in a relationship but not living together (n = 1,323), 43.9% of respondents with chronic migraine indicated that headaches were causing relationship concerns or were preventing a closer relationship, such as moving in together or getting married, compared with 15.8% of patients with episodic migraine. The responses were similar among men (18.0%) and women (17.8%).

About 47% of respondents with chronic migraine reported that headaches have caused one or more previous relationship to end or have other problems, compared with 18.2% of respondents with episodic migraine. Headache contributions to relationship problems (ie, breakup or other difficulties) were similar among men (20.6%) and women (19.9%).

Of those in a relationship and living together (n = 8,127), 78.2% of respondents with chronic migraine agreed that they would be a better partner if they did not have headaches, compared with 46.2% of respondents with episodic migraine. Furthermore, 9.6% of patients with chronic migraine had delayed having children or had fewer children, compared with 2.6% of patients with episodic migraine. The researchers observed no differences between men and women.

SAN FRANCISCO—Patients with chronic migraine are significantly more likely than those with episodic migraine to report that headaches contribute to relationship problems and have a detrimental effect on family life, researchers said at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. Negative effects on family life include a delay in having children and having fewer children.

Migraine can detract from many aspects of family life and affect all members of the patient’s family. Dawn C. Buse, PhD, Clinical Professor of Neurology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx, New York, and colleagues analyzed data from the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) study to understand the effects of episodic and chronic migraine on a person’s relationships and family life.

An Analysis of CaMEO Data

The CaMEO study is a prospective, longitudinal, web-based survey designed to characterize the impact of migraine, among other objectives, in a systematic US sample of people meeting modified ICHD-2R criteria. A total of 19,891 respondents met study criteria, including criteria for migraine, and were invited to complete the Family Burden Module (FBM), which assessed the impact, perception, and emotions related to living with migraine among people with migraine and their family members.

Dr. Buse and colleagues presented the results of migraineurs’ responses to the FBM regarding relationships with spouses or significant others and relationships with children living at home. The investigators stratified migraineurs by episodic migraine (ie, those with fewer than 14 headache days per month) and chronic migraine (ie, those with 15 or more headache days per month). Migraineurs were asked about their current relationship status (ie, in a current relationship or not, living together or not). Questions evaluated how headaches had affected past or current relationships with Likert-type response options that corresponded to degrees of disagreement or agreement. Dr. Buse’s group analyzed items by relationship status, episodic or chronic migraine status, and gender.

Women and Men Were Affected Similarly

In all, 13,064 respondents provided valid data. Of this population, 11,938 (91.4%) had episodic migraine and 1,126 (8.6%) had chronic migraine. Of those not currently in a relationship (n = 3,189), respondents with chronic migraine were significantly more likely to indicate that headaches had contributed to relationship problems (37.0%), compared with patients with episodic migraine (15.0%). Of those in a relationship but not living together (n = 1,323), 43.9% of respondents with chronic migraine indicated that headaches were causing relationship concerns or were preventing a closer relationship, such as moving in together or getting married, compared with 15.8% of patients with episodic migraine. The responses were similar among men (18.0%) and women (17.8%).

About 47% of respondents with chronic migraine reported that headaches have caused one or more previous relationship to end or have other problems, compared with 18.2% of respondents with episodic migraine. Headache contributions to relationship problems (ie, breakup or other difficulties) were similar among men (20.6%) and women (19.9%).

Of those in a relationship and living together (n = 8,127), 78.2% of respondents with chronic migraine agreed that they would be a better partner if they did not have headaches, compared with 46.2% of respondents with episodic migraine. Furthermore, 9.6% of patients with chronic migraine had delayed having children or had fewer children, compared with 2.6% of patients with episodic migraine. The researchers observed no differences between men and women.

SAN FRANCISCO—Among a cohort of recently deployed soldiers, headaches were frequent but were more severe, frequent, and migrainous if associated with concussion, according to a report presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. At one-year follow-up, headache frequency had decreased in soldiers with posttraumatic headache (PTH) but remained higher in this group than in those whose headaches were presumed to be unrelated to head injury, said Ann I. Scher, PhD, Director and Professor of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland, and colleagues.

“There are limited data on the phenotypic differences between headaches related to mild traumatic brain injury and ‘regular’ headaches,” Dr. Scher said. “A better understanding of the posttraumatic headache phenotype will inform the design of interventional studies for this difficult to treat population.”

SAN FRANCISCO—Among a cohort of recently deployed soldiers, headaches were frequent but were more severe, frequent, and migrainous if associated with concussion, according to a report presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. At one-year follow-up, headache frequency had decreased in soldiers with posttraumatic headache (PTH) but remained higher in this group than in those whose headaches were presumed to be unrelated to head injury, said Ann I. Scher, PhD, Director and Professor of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland, and colleagues.

“There are limited data on the phenotypic differences between headaches related to mild traumatic brain injury and ‘regular’ headaches,” Dr. Scher said. “A better understanding of the posttraumatic headache phenotype will inform the design of interventional studies for this difficult to treat population.”

SAN FRANCISCO—Among a cohort of recently deployed soldiers, headaches were frequent but were more severe, frequent, and migrainous if associated with concussion, according to a report presented at the 60th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society. At one-year follow-up, headache frequency had decreased in soldiers with posttraumatic headache (PTH) but remained higher in this group than in those whose headaches were presumed to be unrelated to head injury, said Ann I. Scher, PhD, Director and Professor of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Maryland, and colleagues.

“There are limited data on the phenotypic differences between headaches related to mild traumatic brain injury and ‘regular’ headaches,” Dr. Scher said. “A better understanding of the posttraumatic headache phenotype will inform the design of interventional studies for this difficult to treat population.”

ABSTRACT

This case shows an atypical presentation of an osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the radial head with detachment diagnosed on plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OCD lesions are rather uncommon in the elbow joint; however, when present, these lesions are typically seen in throwing athletes or gymnasts who engage in activities involving repetitive trauma to the elbow. Involvement of the radial head is extremely rare, accounting for <5% of all elbow OCD lesions. Conventional radiographs have low sensitivity for detecting OCD lesions and may frequently miss these lesions in the early stages. MRI, the imaging modality of choice, can detect these lesions at the earliest stage and provide a clear picture of the involved articular cartilage and underlying bone. Treatment options can vary between nonoperative and operative management depending on several factors, including age and activity level of the patient, size and type of lesion, and clinical presentation. This case represents a radial head OCD lesion managed by arthroscopic débridement alone, resulting in a positive outcome.

Continue to: Case Report...

CASE REPORT

A healthy, 14-year-old, left-hand-dominant adolescent boy presented to the office with a chief complaint of pain localized to the posterolateral aspect of his elbow. He described an injury where he felt a “pop” in his elbow followed by immediate pain in the posterolateral elbow after throwing a pitch during a baseball game. Since the injury, the patient had experienced difficulty extending his elbow and a sharp, throbbing pain during forearm rotation. The patient also reported an intermittent clicking feeling in the elbow. Prior to this injury, he had no elbow pain. He presented in an otherwise normal state of health with no reported past medical or surgical history and no previous trauma to the left upper extremity.

Physical examination demonstrated a mild effusion of the left elbow in the region of the posterolateral corner or “soft spot” with tenderness to palpation over the radial head. The patient had restricted elbow motion with 30° to 135° of flexion. He had 90° of pronation and supination. Ligamentous examination revealed stability of the elbow to both varus and valgus stress at 30° of flexion. No deficits were observed upon upper-extremity neurovascular examination.

Plain radiographs of the left elbow were initially taken. Anteroposterior, lateral, and Greenspan views revealed evidence of a displaced osteochondral fragment of the radial head in this skeletally immature patient. No involvement of the capitellum was apparent (Figures 1A-1C). Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the left elbow was subsequently obtained to evaluate the lesion further, and the images confirmed an unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the radial head with a detached fragment entrapped within the elbow joint (Figures 2A-2E).

Elbow arthroscopy was performed to evaluate the extent of the OCD lesion to enable determination of the integrity of the cartilaginous surface and remove the loose body entrapped within the elbow joint. Multiple loose bodies (all <5 mm in size) were removed from the elbow joint. Visualization of the radiocapitellar joint revealed extensive cartilage damage to the radial head with multiple areas of denuded cartilage and exposed bone. The main chondral defect measured approximately 4 mm in size. Probing of the lesion confirmed no stable edge; thus, abrasion arthroplasty was performed to stabilize the lesion and stimulate future fibrous cartilage growth (Figures 3A, 3B).

The patient was started on physical therapy consisting of active and active-assisted elbow ranges of motion on postoperative day 10. At the 6-week follow up, the patient presented to the office with pain-free motion of the left elbow ranging from −5° to 135° of flexion. He maintained full pronation and supination. At this point, the patient was advised to begin a throwing program. Three months after treatment, the patient resumed baseball activities, including throwing, with pain-free, full range of motion of the elbow. The patient and the patient’s parents provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.

Continue to: Discussion...

DISCUSSION

Elbow pain is a common complaint among young baseball players. OCD lesions, however, are an uncommon entity associated with elbow pathology.¹ The overall incidence of OCD lesions is between 15 to 30 per 100,000 people.^2-3 Specifically in patients aged 2 to 19 years, the incidence of elbow OCD lesions is 2.2 per 100,000 patients and 3.8 and 0.6 per 100,000 for males and females, respectively.⁴ Radial head OCD lesions are extremely rare, occurring in <5% of all elbow OCD cases.¹ The majority of these lesions are asymptomatic and typically seen in patients who engage in repetitive overhead and upper-extremity weight-bearing activities. Reports indicate that the incidence of these lesions is on the rise and the age of presentation is decreasing, likely because of increased awareness of the disease and increasing involvement of young athletes in competitive athletics.^4-5 Most patients with elbow OCD have a history of repetitive overuse of the elbow, as seen in baseball players, leading to excessive compressive and shear forces across the radiocapitellar joint and progression of the dissecans lesion.⁶

Patients with OCD lesions of the elbow typically present with inflammatory type symptoms and lateral elbow pain. The pain tends to be mild at rest and becomes more pronounced with activity. Patients often wait until mechanical symptoms ensue (eg, clicking, catching, or locking) before presenting to the office. On physical examination, pain in the region of the OCD lesion is usually accompanied by a mild effusion. Stiffness, particularly a loss of terminal extension, may accompany the mechanical symptoms on range of motion testing.⁷

Workup of elbow OCD lesions begins with obtaining plain radiographs of the elbow. Plain films are of limited use in evaluating these lesions but can help determine separation and the approximate size of the fragment.⁸ Further work-up must include MRI sequences, which allow for the best evaluation of the articular cartilage, underlying bone, and, specifically, the size and degree of separation of the OCD lesion.⁹

Nonoperative treatment of OCD lesions is usually successful if diagnosed early. Such treatment consists of activity modification, rest, anti-inflammatory medications, and a gradual return to athletic activities over the next 3 to 6 months provided the symptoms abate.^10-11 During this interval, physical therapy may be employed to preserve or regain range of motion in the elbow. Clinical evidence has demonstrated improved outcomes in younger athletes with open physes.¹² Returning to athletic activities is advised only when complete resolution of symptoms has been achieved and full motion about the elbow and shoulder girdle has been regained.⁶

If symptoms persist despite nonoperative management, or if evidence of an unstable lesion (ie, detached fragment) is obtained, operative intervention is appropriate. Operative management includes diagnostic arthroscopy of the entire elbow, removal of any small, loose bodies, and synovectomy as needed. Thereafter, the OCD lesion must be addressed. In cases of capitellar OCD lesions, if the articular cartilage surface is intact, antegrade or retrograde drilling of the subchondral bone is appropriate and will likely result in a good-to-excellent functional outcome.^13-14 If disruption to the articular cartilage fissures is found or the lesion appears to be separating from the native bone, fixation of the fragment can be attempted, provided an adequate portion of the subchondral bone remains attached to the OCD lesion.^6,14 Oftentimes, the bony bed must be prepared prior to fixation by removal of any fibrous tissue overlying the subchondral bone and ensuring adequate bleeding across the entire bed. Care should be taken to remove any fibrous tissue underlying the OCD lesion. If the OCD lesion is completely loose and/or the bone stock is insufficient or fragmented, arthroscopic removal of the OCD lesion followed by débridement and abrasion arthroplasty of subchondral bone is recommended.¹⁵ Improved functional outcomes from this procedure can be expected in contained lesions.¹⁵ If the patient continues to be symptomatic, osteochondral autograft or allograft procedures can be attempted depending on the size of the remaining defect.^16-18

Other cases of radial head OCD lesions have been reported in the literature.^19-20 In 2009, Dotzis and colleagues¹⁹ reported a case of an OCD lesion that was managed nonsurgically with observation alone as the lesion was stable and non-detached. Tatebe and colleagues²⁰ reported 4 cases in which OCD involved the radial head and was accompanied by radial head subluxation. All lesions were located at the posteromedial aspect of the radial head with anterior subluxation of the radial head.²⁰ Three of the cases were managed surgically via ulnar osteotomy (2 cases) and fragment removal (1 case).²⁰ All except the 1 case treated by fragment excision revealed a good outcome.²⁰ The patient in this case presented with a detached lesion, confirmed on MRI, with pain, mechanical symptoms, and of loss of terminal extension. Given the chronicity of the injury and the presence of mechanical symptoms, the decision was made to proceed with operative intervention. During elbow arthroscopy, multiple loose bodies were removed from the elbow joint, and inspection of the radiocapitellar joint revealed extensive cartilage damage to the radial head with multiple areas of denuded cartilage and exposed bone. Since the OCD lesion was completely loose and the bone stock was insufficient and too fragmented to attempt fixation, abrasion arthroplasty was performed to stabilize the lesion and stimulate future fibrous cartilage growth. At the 6-week follow up, the patient regained full range of motion of this elbow with no complaints of pain. At the 3-month follow up, the patient reported no pain after returning to throwing and all baseball-related activities.

CONCLUSION

This report presents an extremely rare case of an OCD lesion involving the radial head. Diagnosis and treatment of this lesion followed a protocol similar to that used for the management of capitellar OCD lesions. When dealing with elbow OCD lesions, especially in the skeletally immature patient population, nonsurgical management and a gradual return to activities should be attempted. If symptoms persist despite nonoperative management or evidence of an unstable lesion (as presented in this case) is obtained, operative intervention is appropriate.

ABSTRACT

This case shows an atypical presentation of an osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the radial head with detachment diagnosed on plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OCD lesions are rather uncommon in the elbow joint; however, when present, these lesions are typically seen in throwing athletes or gymnasts who engage in activities involving repetitive trauma to the elbow. Involvement of the radial head is extremely rare, accounting for <5% of all elbow OCD lesions. Conventional radiographs have low sensitivity for detecting OCD lesions and may frequently miss these lesions in the early stages. MRI, the imaging modality of choice, can detect these lesions at the earliest stage and provide a clear picture of the involved articular cartilage and underlying bone. Treatment options can vary between nonoperative and operative management depending on several factors, including age and activity level of the patient, size and type of lesion, and clinical presentation. This case represents a radial head OCD lesion managed by arthroscopic débridement alone, resulting in a positive outcome.

Continue to: Case Report...

CASE REPORT

A healthy, 14-year-old, left-hand-dominant adolescent boy presented to the office with a chief complaint of pain localized to the posterolateral aspect of his elbow. He described an injury where he felt a “pop” in his elbow followed by immediate pain in the posterolateral elbow after throwing a pitch during a baseball game. Since the injury, the patient had experienced difficulty extending his elbow and a sharp, throbbing pain during forearm rotation. The patient also reported an intermittent clicking feeling in the elbow. Prior to this injury, he had no elbow pain. He presented in an otherwise normal state of health with no reported past medical or surgical history and no previous trauma to the left upper extremity.

Physical examination demonstrated a mild effusion of the left elbow in the region of the posterolateral corner or “soft spot” with tenderness to palpation over the radial head. The patient had restricted elbow motion with 30° to 135° of flexion. He had 90° of pronation and supination. Ligamentous examination revealed stability of the elbow to both varus and valgus stress at 30° of flexion. No deficits were observed upon upper-extremity neurovascular examination.

Plain radiographs of the left elbow were initially taken. Anteroposterior, lateral, and Greenspan views revealed evidence of a displaced osteochondral fragment of the radial head in this skeletally immature patient. No involvement of the capitellum was apparent (Figures 1A-1C). Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the left elbow was subsequently obtained to evaluate the lesion further, and the images confirmed an unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the radial head with a detached fragment entrapped within the elbow joint (Figures 2A-2E).

Elbow arthroscopy was performed to evaluate the extent of the OCD lesion to enable determination of the integrity of the cartilaginous surface and remove the loose body entrapped within the elbow joint. Multiple loose bodies (all <5 mm in size) were removed from the elbow joint. Visualization of the radiocapitellar joint revealed extensive cartilage damage to the radial head with multiple areas of denuded cartilage and exposed bone. The main chondral defect measured approximately 4 mm in size. Probing of the lesion confirmed no stable edge; thus, abrasion arthroplasty was performed to stabilize the lesion and stimulate future fibrous cartilage growth (Figures 3A, 3B).

The patient was started on physical therapy consisting of active and active-assisted elbow ranges of motion on postoperative day 10. At the 6-week follow up, the patient presented to the office with pain-free motion of the left elbow ranging from −5° to 135° of flexion. He maintained full pronation and supination. At this point, the patient was advised to begin a throwing program. Three months after treatment, the patient resumed baseball activities, including throwing, with pain-free, full range of motion of the elbow. The patient and the patient’s parents provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.

Continue to: Discussion...

DISCUSSION

Elbow pain is a common complaint among young baseball players. OCD lesions, however, are an uncommon entity associated with elbow pathology.¹ The overall incidence of OCD lesions is between 15 to 30 per 100,000 people.^2-3 Specifically in patients aged 2 to 19 years, the incidence of elbow OCD lesions is 2.2 per 100,000 patients and 3.8 and 0.6 per 100,000 for males and females, respectively.⁴ Radial head OCD lesions are extremely rare, occurring in <5% of all elbow OCD cases.¹ The majority of these lesions are asymptomatic and typically seen in patients who engage in repetitive overhead and upper-extremity weight-bearing activities. Reports indicate that the incidence of these lesions is on the rise and the age of presentation is decreasing, likely because of increased awareness of the disease and increasing involvement of young athletes in competitive athletics.^4-5 Most patients with elbow OCD have a history of repetitive overuse of the elbow, as seen in baseball players, leading to excessive compressive and shear forces across the radiocapitellar joint and progression of the dissecans lesion.⁶

Patients with OCD lesions of the elbow typically present with inflammatory type symptoms and lateral elbow pain. The pain tends to be mild at rest and becomes more pronounced with activity. Patients often wait until mechanical symptoms ensue (eg, clicking, catching, or locking) before presenting to the office. On physical examination, pain in the region of the OCD lesion is usually accompanied by a mild effusion. Stiffness, particularly a loss of terminal extension, may accompany the mechanical symptoms on range of motion testing.⁷

Workup of elbow OCD lesions begins with obtaining plain radiographs of the elbow. Plain films are of limited use in evaluating these lesions but can help determine separation and the approximate size of the fragment.⁸ Further work-up must include MRI sequences, which allow for the best evaluation of the articular cartilage, underlying bone, and, specifically, the size and degree of separation of the OCD lesion.⁹

Nonoperative treatment of OCD lesions is usually successful if diagnosed early. Such treatment consists of activity modification, rest, anti-inflammatory medications, and a gradual return to athletic activities over the next 3 to 6 months provided the symptoms abate.^10-11 During this interval, physical therapy may be employed to preserve or regain range of motion in the elbow. Clinical evidence has demonstrated improved outcomes in younger athletes with open physes.¹² Returning to athletic activities is advised only when complete resolution of symptoms has been achieved and full motion about the elbow and shoulder girdle has been regained.⁶

If symptoms persist despite nonoperative management, or if evidence of an unstable lesion (ie, detached fragment) is obtained, operative intervention is appropriate. Operative management includes diagnostic arthroscopy of the entire elbow, removal of any small, loose bodies, and synovectomy as needed. Thereafter, the OCD lesion must be addressed. In cases of capitellar OCD lesions, if the articular cartilage surface is intact, antegrade or retrograde drilling of the subchondral bone is appropriate and will likely result in a good-to-excellent functional outcome.^13-14 If disruption to the articular cartilage fissures is found or the lesion appears to be separating from the native bone, fixation of the fragment can be attempted, provided an adequate portion of the subchondral bone remains attached to the OCD lesion.^6,14 Oftentimes, the bony bed must be prepared prior to fixation by removal of any fibrous tissue overlying the subchondral bone and ensuring adequate bleeding across the entire bed. Care should be taken to remove any fibrous tissue underlying the OCD lesion. If the OCD lesion is completely loose and/or the bone stock is insufficient or fragmented, arthroscopic removal of the OCD lesion followed by débridement and abrasion arthroplasty of subchondral bone is recommended.¹⁵ Improved functional outcomes from this procedure can be expected in contained lesions.¹⁵ If the patient continues to be symptomatic, osteochondral autograft or allograft procedures can be attempted depending on the size of the remaining defect.^16-18

Other cases of radial head OCD lesions have been reported in the literature.^19-20 In 2009, Dotzis and colleagues¹⁹ reported a case of an OCD lesion that was managed nonsurgically with observation alone as the lesion was stable and non-detached. Tatebe and colleagues²⁰ reported 4 cases in which OCD involved the radial head and was accompanied by radial head subluxation. All lesions were located at the posteromedial aspect of the radial head with anterior subluxation of the radial head.²⁰ Three of the cases were managed surgically via ulnar osteotomy (2 cases) and fragment removal (1 case).²⁰ All except the 1 case treated by fragment excision revealed a good outcome.²⁰ The patient in this case presented with a detached lesion, confirmed on MRI, with pain, mechanical symptoms, and of loss of terminal extension. Given the chronicity of the injury and the presence of mechanical symptoms, the decision was made to proceed with operative intervention. During elbow arthroscopy, multiple loose bodies were removed from the elbow joint, and inspection of the radiocapitellar joint revealed extensive cartilage damage to the radial head with multiple areas of denuded cartilage and exposed bone. Since the OCD lesion was completely loose and the bone stock was insufficient and too fragmented to attempt fixation, abrasion arthroplasty was performed to stabilize the lesion and stimulate future fibrous cartilage growth. At the 6-week follow up, the patient regained full range of motion of this elbow with no complaints of pain. At the 3-month follow up, the patient reported no pain after returning to throwing and all baseball-related activities.

CONCLUSION

This report presents an extremely rare case of an OCD lesion involving the radial head. Diagnosis and treatment of this lesion followed a protocol similar to that used for the management of capitellar OCD lesions. When dealing with elbow OCD lesions, especially in the skeletally immature patient population, nonsurgical management and a gradual return to activities should be attempted. If symptoms persist despite nonoperative management or evidence of an unstable lesion (as presented in this case) is obtained, operative intervention is appropriate.

ABSTRACT

This case shows an atypical presentation of an osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the radial head with detachment diagnosed on plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OCD lesions are rather uncommon in the elbow joint; however, when present, these lesions are typically seen in throwing athletes or gymnasts who engage in activities involving repetitive trauma to the elbow. Involvement of the radial head is extremely rare, accounting for <5% of all elbow OCD lesions. Conventional radiographs have low sensitivity for detecting OCD lesions and may frequently miss these lesions in the early stages. MRI, the imaging modality of choice, can detect these lesions at the earliest stage and provide a clear picture of the involved articular cartilage and underlying bone. Treatment options can vary between nonoperative and operative management depending on several factors, including age and activity level of the patient, size and type of lesion, and clinical presentation. This case represents a radial head OCD lesion managed by arthroscopic débridement alone, resulting in a positive outcome.

Continue to: Case Report...

CASE REPORT

A healthy, 14-year-old, left-hand-dominant adolescent boy presented to the office with a chief complaint of pain localized to the posterolateral aspect of his elbow. He described an injury where he felt a “pop” in his elbow followed by immediate pain in the posterolateral elbow after throwing a pitch during a baseball game. Since the injury, the patient had experienced difficulty extending his elbow and a sharp, throbbing pain during forearm rotation. The patient also reported an intermittent clicking feeling in the elbow. Prior to this injury, he had no elbow pain. He presented in an otherwise normal state of health with no reported past medical or surgical history and no previous trauma to the left upper extremity.

Physical examination demonstrated a mild effusion of the left elbow in the region of the posterolateral corner or “soft spot” with tenderness to palpation over the radial head. The patient had restricted elbow motion with 30° to 135° of flexion. He had 90° of pronation and supination. Ligamentous examination revealed stability of the elbow to both varus and valgus stress at 30° of flexion. No deficits were observed upon upper-extremity neurovascular examination.

Plain radiographs of the left elbow were initially taken. Anteroposterior, lateral, and Greenspan views revealed evidence of a displaced osteochondral fragment of the radial head in this skeletally immature patient. No involvement of the capitellum was apparent (Figures 1A-1C). Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the left elbow was subsequently obtained to evaluate the lesion further, and the images confirmed an unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the radial head with a detached fragment entrapped within the elbow joint (Figures 2A-2E).

Elbow arthroscopy was performed to evaluate the extent of the OCD lesion to enable determination of the integrity of the cartilaginous surface and remove the loose body entrapped within the elbow joint. Multiple loose bodies (all <5 mm in size) were removed from the elbow joint. Visualization of the radiocapitellar joint revealed extensive cartilage damage to the radial head with multiple areas of denuded cartilage and exposed bone. The main chondral defect measured approximately 4 mm in size. Probing of the lesion confirmed no stable edge; thus, abrasion arthroplasty was performed to stabilize the lesion and stimulate future fibrous cartilage growth (Figures 3A, 3B).

The patient was started on physical therapy consisting of active and active-assisted elbow ranges of motion on postoperative day 10. At the 6-week follow up, the patient presented to the office with pain-free motion of the left elbow ranging from −5° to 135° of flexion. He maintained full pronation and supination. At this point, the patient was advised to begin a throwing program. Three months after treatment, the patient resumed baseball activities, including throwing, with pain-free, full range of motion of the elbow. The patient and the patient’s parents provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of this case report.

Continue to: Discussion...

DISCUSSION

Elbow pain is a common complaint among young baseball players. OCD lesions, however, are an uncommon entity associated with elbow pathology.¹ The overall incidence of OCD lesions is between 15 to 30 per 100,000 people.^2-3 Specifically in patients aged 2 to 19 years, the incidence of elbow OCD lesions is 2.2 per 100,000 patients and 3.8 and 0.6 per 100,000 for males and females, respectively.⁴ Radial head OCD lesions are extremely rare, occurring in <5% of all elbow OCD cases.¹ The majority of these lesions are asymptomatic and typically seen in patients who engage in repetitive overhead and upper-extremity weight-bearing activities. Reports indicate that the incidence of these lesions is on the rise and the age of presentation is decreasing, likely because of increased awareness of the disease and increasing involvement of young athletes in competitive athletics.^4-5 Most patients with elbow OCD have a history of repetitive overuse of the elbow, as seen in baseball players, leading to excessive compressive and shear forces across the radiocapitellar joint and progression of the dissecans lesion.⁶

Patients with OCD lesions of the elbow typically present with inflammatory type symptoms and lateral elbow pain. The pain tends to be mild at rest and becomes more pronounced with activity. Patients often wait until mechanical symptoms ensue (eg, clicking, catching, or locking) before presenting to the office. On physical examination, pain in the region of the OCD lesion is usually accompanied by a mild effusion. Stiffness, particularly a loss of terminal extension, may accompany the mechanical symptoms on range of motion testing.⁷

Workup of elbow OCD lesions begins with obtaining plain radiographs of the elbow. Plain films are of limited use in evaluating these lesions but can help determine separation and the approximate size of the fragment.⁸ Further work-up must include MRI sequences, which allow for the best evaluation of the articular cartilage, underlying bone, and, specifically, the size and degree of separation of the OCD lesion.⁹

Nonoperative treatment of OCD lesions is usually successful if diagnosed early. Such treatment consists of activity modification, rest, anti-inflammatory medications, and a gradual return to athletic activities over the next 3 to 6 months provided the symptoms abate.^10-11 During this interval, physical therapy may be employed to preserve or regain range of motion in the elbow. Clinical evidence has demonstrated improved outcomes in younger athletes with open physes.¹² Returning to athletic activities is advised only when complete resolution of symptoms has been achieved and full motion about the elbow and shoulder girdle has been regained.⁶

If symptoms persist despite nonoperative management, or if evidence of an unstable lesion (ie, detached fragment) is obtained, operative intervention is appropriate. Operative management includes diagnostic arthroscopy of the entire elbow, removal of any small, loose bodies, and synovectomy as needed. Thereafter, the OCD lesion must be addressed. In cases of capitellar OCD lesions, if the articular cartilage surface is intact, antegrade or retrograde drilling of the subchondral bone is appropriate and will likely result in a good-to-excellent functional outcome.^13-14 If disruption to the articular cartilage fissures is found or the lesion appears to be separating from the native bone, fixation of the fragment can be attempted, provided an adequate portion of the subchondral bone remains attached to the OCD lesion.^6,14 Oftentimes, the bony bed must be prepared prior to fixation by removal of any fibrous tissue overlying the subchondral bone and ensuring adequate bleeding across the entire bed. Care should be taken to remove any fibrous tissue underlying the OCD lesion. If the OCD lesion is completely loose and/or the bone stock is insufficient or fragmented, arthroscopic removal of the OCD lesion followed by débridement and abrasion arthroplasty of subchondral bone is recommended.¹⁵ Improved functional outcomes from this procedure can be expected in contained lesions.¹⁵ If the patient continues to be symptomatic, osteochondral autograft or allograft procedures can be attempted depending on the size of the remaining defect.^16-18

Other cases of radial head OCD lesions have been reported in the literature.^19-20 In 2009, Dotzis and colleagues¹⁹ reported a case of an OCD lesion that was managed nonsurgically with observation alone as the lesion was stable and non-detached. Tatebe and colleagues²⁰ reported 4 cases in which OCD involved the radial head and was accompanied by radial head subluxation. All lesions were located at the posteromedial aspect of the radial head with anterior subluxation of the radial head.²⁰ Three of the cases were managed surgically via ulnar osteotomy (2 cases) and fragment removal (1 case).²⁰ All except the 1 case treated by fragment excision revealed a good outcome.²⁰ The patient in this case presented with a detached lesion, confirmed on MRI, with pain, mechanical symptoms, and of loss of terminal extension. Given the chronicity of the injury and the presence of mechanical symptoms, the decision was made to proceed with operative intervention. During elbow arthroscopy, multiple loose bodies were removed from the elbow joint, and inspection of the radiocapitellar joint revealed extensive cartilage damage to the radial head with multiple areas of denuded cartilage and exposed bone. Since the OCD lesion was completely loose and the bone stock was insufficient and too fragmented to attempt fixation, abrasion arthroplasty was performed to stabilize the lesion and stimulate future fibrous cartilage growth. At the 6-week follow up, the patient regained full range of motion of this elbow with no complaints of pain. At the 3-month follow up, the patient reported no pain after returning to throwing and all baseball-related activities.

CONCLUSION

This report presents an extremely rare case of an OCD lesion involving the radial head. Diagnosis and treatment of this lesion followed a protocol similar to that used for the management of capitellar OCD lesions. When dealing with elbow OCD lesions, especially in the skeletally immature patient population, nonsurgical management and a gradual return to activities should be attempted. If symptoms persist despite nonoperative management or evidence of an unstable lesion (as presented in this case) is obtained, operative intervention is appropriate.

MIAMI—Anxiety and depressive disorders may precede Parkinson’s disease diagnosis in more than half of patients—anxiety by 25 years and depression by 17 years, on average, according to research described at the Second Pan American Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Congress. The data suggest that “neurodegenerative changes may be present in the limbic system before affecting motor circuits,” said the researchers.

“Anxiety, depression, impulse control disorders, irritability, mania, psychosis, and cognitive deficits are the most common psychiatric features of Parkinson’s disease,” said Andreea L. Seritan, MD, Professor of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and colleagues. Previous research has indicated that anxiety and depression increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease.

A Retrospective Chart Review

To examine the lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders and compare the onset ages of anxiety and depressive disorders with ages at Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, Dr. Seritan and colleagues conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with Parkinson’s disease who were evaluated by psychiatrists at the UCSF Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center. The center provides comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation and management of patients with movement disorders.

The researchers analyzed data from all 108 patients with Parkinson’s disease seen between October 2015 and January 2018.

Psychiatric diagnoses and onset ages were established through clinical interview, using DSM-V criteria. Researchers used neurologists’ notes to identify age of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. When exact onset ages were not available, the researchers imputed missing onset ages by decade of life.

Most Patients Had a Lifetime Prevalence of Depressive Disorders

Of the 108 participants, 33.3% were women, and the mean age was 63.7. In all, 67% of patients had a lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders, and 87% of participants had a lifetime prevalence of depressive disorders.

Psychiatric symptoms preceded Parkinson’s disease diagnosis in 48 (72%) patients with anxiety disorders and in 58 (68%) of those with depressive disorders. “Both anxiety and depressive disorders had onset in the fourth decade of life, on average, preceding Parkinson’s disease diagnosis by approximately two decades,” Dr. Seritan and colleagues said.

—Erica Tricarico

MIAMI—Anxiety and depressive disorders may precede Parkinson’s disease diagnosis in more than half of patients—anxiety by 25 years and depression by 17 years, on average, according to research described at the Second Pan American Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Congress. The data suggest that “neurodegenerative changes may be present in the limbic system before affecting motor circuits,” said the researchers.

“Anxiety, depression, impulse control disorders, irritability, mania, psychosis, and cognitive deficits are the most common psychiatric features of Parkinson’s disease,” said Andreea L. Seritan, MD, Professor of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and colleagues. Previous research has indicated that anxiety and depression increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease.

A Retrospective Chart Review

To examine the lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders and compare the onset ages of anxiety and depressive disorders with ages at Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, Dr. Seritan and colleagues conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with Parkinson’s disease who were evaluated by psychiatrists at the UCSF Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center. The center provides comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation and management of patients with movement disorders.

The researchers analyzed data from all 108 patients with Parkinson’s disease seen between October 2015 and January 2018.

Psychiatric diagnoses and onset ages were established through clinical interview, using DSM-V criteria. Researchers used neurologists’ notes to identify age of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. When exact onset ages were not available, the researchers imputed missing onset ages by decade of life.

Most Patients Had a Lifetime Prevalence of Depressive Disorders

Of the 108 participants, 33.3% were women, and the mean age was 63.7. In all, 67% of patients had a lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders, and 87% of participants had a lifetime prevalence of depressive disorders.

Psychiatric symptoms preceded Parkinson’s disease diagnosis in 48 (72%) patients with anxiety disorders and in 58 (68%) of those with depressive disorders. “Both anxiety and depressive disorders had onset in the fourth decade of life, on average, preceding Parkinson’s disease diagnosis by approximately two decades,” Dr. Seritan and colleagues said.

—Erica Tricarico

MIAMI—Anxiety and depressive disorders may precede Parkinson’s disease diagnosis in more than half of patients—anxiety by 25 years and depression by 17 years, on average, according to research described at the Second Pan American Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Congress. The data suggest that “neurodegenerative changes may be present in the limbic system before affecting motor circuits,” said the researchers.

“Anxiety, depression, impulse control disorders, irritability, mania, psychosis, and cognitive deficits are the most common psychiatric features of Parkinson’s disease,” said Andreea L. Seritan, MD, Professor of Psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and colleagues. Previous research has indicated that anxiety and depression increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease.

A Retrospective Chart Review

To examine the lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders and compare the onset ages of anxiety and depressive disorders with ages at Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, Dr. Seritan and colleagues conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with Parkinson’s disease who were evaluated by psychiatrists at the UCSF Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Center. The center provides comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation and management of patients with movement disorders.

The researchers analyzed data from all 108 patients with Parkinson’s disease seen between October 2015 and January 2018.

Psychiatric diagnoses and onset ages were established through clinical interview, using DSM-V criteria. Researchers used neurologists’ notes to identify age of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis. When exact onset ages were not available, the researchers imputed missing onset ages by decade of life.

Most Patients Had a Lifetime Prevalence of Depressive Disorders

Of the 108 participants, 33.3% were women, and the mean age was 63.7. In all, 67% of patients had a lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders, and 87% of participants had a lifetime prevalence of depressive disorders.

Psychiatric symptoms preceded Parkinson’s disease diagnosis in 48 (72%) patients with anxiety disorders and in 58 (68%) of those with depressive disorders. “Both anxiety and depressive disorders had onset in the fourth decade of life, on average, preceding Parkinson’s disease diagnosis by approximately two decades,” Dr. Seritan and colleagues said.

—Erica Tricarico