UC San Diego

Engineers say they have developed biomimetic bone tissues that could one day provide new bone marrow for patients requiring transplants.

The team created bone tissues with functional bone marrow that can be filled with donor cells and implanted under the skin of mice.

The implant gives donor cells their own space to live and grow without competition, eliminating the need for a conditioning regimen to wipe out the host’s pre-existing cells prior to transplant.

“We’ve made an accessory bone that can separately accommodate donor cells,” explained Shyni Varghese, PhD, of the University of California, San Diego.

“This way, we can keep the host cells and bypass irradiation.”

In mice that received the engineered bone tissue, donor hematopoietic cells survived for at least 6 months and supplied the mice with new blood cells.

“In the future, our work could contribute to improved therapies for bone marrow disease,” said Yu-Ru Vernon Shih, PhD, a researcher in Dr Varghese’s lab.

The researchers noted that these implants would be limited to patients with non-malignant bone marrow diseases, such as aplastic anemia, where there aren’t any cancerous cells that need to be eliminated prior to transplant.

The team described their bone tissue implants in PNAS.

The implants mimic the structure of long bones in the body, consisting of an outer bone compartment and an inner marrow compartment.

The implants are made of a porous hydrogel matrix. The outer matrix contains calcium phosphate minerals. Stem cells grown in this mineralized matrix differentiate into bone-building cells. The inner matrix houses donor stem cells that produce blood cells.

When implanted beneath the skin of mice, the structures matured into bone tissues that have a working blood vessel network and a bone marrow that supplies new blood cells.

After 4 weeks, the implanted marrow contained a mix of host and donor blood cells. This mix was still circulating in the bloodstream after 24 weeks.

The researchers said these findings suggest the implanted marrow is functional, donor cells can grow and survive for long time periods in the presence of host cells, and host and donor cells can travel between the implanted marrow and the host’s circulating blood via the blood vessel network formed in the implanted bone tissue.

In another set of experiments, the researchers took hematopoietic stem cells from the implanted marrow and transplanted them into a second group of mice that had their stem cells destroyed by radiation and drugs. The team found the transplanted cells had diffused into the bloodstream of these mice.

“We did these experiments to show that the bone marrow cells from the engineered bone tissues function similar to native bone,” Dr Shih said.

“We’re working on making this a platform to generate more bone marrow stem cells,” Dr Varghese added. “That would have useful applications for cell transplantations in the clinic.” 

UC San Diego

Engineers say they have developed biomimetic bone tissues that could one day provide new bone marrow for patients requiring transplants.

The team created bone tissues with functional bone marrow that can be filled with donor cells and implanted under the skin of mice.

The implant gives donor cells their own space to live and grow without competition, eliminating the need for a conditioning regimen to wipe out the host’s pre-existing cells prior to transplant.

“We’ve made an accessory bone that can separately accommodate donor cells,” explained Shyni Varghese, PhD, of the University of California, San Diego.

“This way, we can keep the host cells and bypass irradiation.”

In mice that received the engineered bone tissue, donor hematopoietic cells survived for at least 6 months and supplied the mice with new blood cells.

“In the future, our work could contribute to improved therapies for bone marrow disease,” said Yu-Ru Vernon Shih, PhD, a researcher in Dr Varghese’s lab.

The researchers noted that these implants would be limited to patients with non-malignant bone marrow diseases, such as aplastic anemia, where there aren’t any cancerous cells that need to be eliminated prior to transplant.

The team described their bone tissue implants in PNAS.

The implants mimic the structure of long bones in the body, consisting of an outer bone compartment and an inner marrow compartment.

The implants are made of a porous hydrogel matrix. The outer matrix contains calcium phosphate minerals. Stem cells grown in this mineralized matrix differentiate into bone-building cells. The inner matrix houses donor stem cells that produce blood cells.

When implanted beneath the skin of mice, the structures matured into bone tissues that have a working blood vessel network and a bone marrow that supplies new blood cells.

After 4 weeks, the implanted marrow contained a mix of host and donor blood cells. This mix was still circulating in the bloodstream after 24 weeks.

The researchers said these findings suggest the implanted marrow is functional, donor cells can grow and survive for long time periods in the presence of host cells, and host and donor cells can travel between the implanted marrow and the host’s circulating blood via the blood vessel network formed in the implanted bone tissue.

In another set of experiments, the researchers took hematopoietic stem cells from the implanted marrow and transplanted them into a second group of mice that had their stem cells destroyed by radiation and drugs. The team found the transplanted cells had diffused into the bloodstream of these mice.

“We did these experiments to show that the bone marrow cells from the engineered bone tissues function similar to native bone,” Dr Shih said.

“We’re working on making this a platform to generate more bone marrow stem cells,” Dr Varghese added. “That would have useful applications for cell transplantations in the clinic.” 

UC San Diego

Engineers say they have developed biomimetic bone tissues that could one day provide new bone marrow for patients requiring transplants.

The team created bone tissues with functional bone marrow that can be filled with donor cells and implanted under the skin of mice.

The implant gives donor cells their own space to live and grow without competition, eliminating the need for a conditioning regimen to wipe out the host’s pre-existing cells prior to transplant.

“We’ve made an accessory bone that can separately accommodate donor cells,” explained Shyni Varghese, PhD, of the University of California, San Diego.

“This way, we can keep the host cells and bypass irradiation.”

In mice that received the engineered bone tissue, donor hematopoietic cells survived for at least 6 months and supplied the mice with new blood cells.

“In the future, our work could contribute to improved therapies for bone marrow disease,” said Yu-Ru Vernon Shih, PhD, a researcher in Dr Varghese’s lab.

The researchers noted that these implants would be limited to patients with non-malignant bone marrow diseases, such as aplastic anemia, where there aren’t any cancerous cells that need to be eliminated prior to transplant.

The team described their bone tissue implants in PNAS.

The implants mimic the structure of long bones in the body, consisting of an outer bone compartment and an inner marrow compartment.

The implants are made of a porous hydrogel matrix. The outer matrix contains calcium phosphate minerals. Stem cells grown in this mineralized matrix differentiate into bone-building cells. The inner matrix houses donor stem cells that produce blood cells.

When implanted beneath the skin of mice, the structures matured into bone tissues that have a working blood vessel network and a bone marrow that supplies new blood cells.

After 4 weeks, the implanted marrow contained a mix of host and donor blood cells. This mix was still circulating in the bloodstream after 24 weeks.

The researchers said these findings suggest the implanted marrow is functional, donor cells can grow and survive for long time periods in the presence of host cells, and host and donor cells can travel between the implanted marrow and the host’s circulating blood via the blood vessel network formed in the implanted bone tissue.

In another set of experiments, the researchers took hematopoietic stem cells from the implanted marrow and transplanted them into a second group of mice that had their stem cells destroyed by radiation and drugs. The team found the transplanted cells had diffused into the bloodstream of these mice.

“We did these experiments to show that the bone marrow cells from the engineered bone tissues function similar to native bone,” Dr Shih said.

“We’re working on making this a platform to generate more bone marrow stem cells,” Dr Varghese added. “That would have useful applications for cell transplantations in the clinic.” 

Micrograph showing MDS

VALENCIA, SPAIN—Phase 2 results suggest luspatercept can produce erythroid responses and enable transfusion independence in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Erythroid response rates were similar whether or not patients had received prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

However, patients without prior ESA exposure were more likely to achieve transfusion independence.

Most adverse events (AEs) considered possibly or probably related to luspatercept were grade 1 or 2.

Uwe Platzbecker, MD, of Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden, Germany, presented these results at the 14th International Symposium on MDS.

The research was sponsored by Acceleron Pharma Inc., the company developing luspatercept in collaboration with Celgene Corporation.

Dr Platzbecker explained that luspatercept, formerly ACE-536, is a modified activin receptor type IIB fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for GDF11 and other TGF-βfamily ligands to suppress Smad2/3 signaling.

He presented data from a phase 2 base study and an extension study of luspatercept. The base study included 89 patients who received luspatercept for 3 months. The long-term extension study included 52 patients who may receive luspatercept for an additional 5 years.

The patients received luspatercept at doses ranging from 0.125 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the base study and 1.0 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the extension study. They received the drug subcutaneously every 3 weeks.

There were 82 patients evaluable for efficacy. They were a median of 2.3 years from diagnosis (range, 0-14). Their median age was 72 (range, 29-90), 63% were male, and 52% had prior treatment with ESAs.

The outcome measures used in these studies were clinically meaningful erythroid hematologic improvement per the International Working Group’s criteria (IWG HI-E) and red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI).

IWG HI-E was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a transfusion burden at baseline of less than 4 RBC units every 8 weeks and baseline hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL. For patients with a greater transfusion burden at baseline, erythroid response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 RBC units sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

RBC-TI was defined as no RBC transfusions for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a baseline transfusion burden of at least 2 RBC units every 8 weeks.

Response data

In ESA-naïve patients, 48% (11/23) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (20/39) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

Among patients with prior ESA treatment, 33% (11/33) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (22/43) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

In patients with baseline erythropoietin (EPO) levels ≤ 500 international units per liter (IU/L), RBC-TI and IWG HI-E response rates were positive in both ring sideroblast-positive (RS+) and RS-negative (RS-) patients, according to the researchers.

*Table includes ESA-refractory and ESA-naïve patients. Patients treated at dose levels ≥ 0.75 mg/kg.

Safety data

All 89 patients were evaluable for safety. Common AEs (occurring in at least 3 patients) that were considered possibly or probably related to study drug were fatigue (6.7%), headache (6.7%), hypertension (5.6%), diarrhea (4.5%), arthralgia (3.4%), bone pain (3.4%), injection site erythema (3.4%), myalgia (3.4%), and peripheral edema (3.4%).

Grade 3 AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were ascites, blast cell count increase, blood bilirubin increase, hypertension, platelet count increase, and pleural effusion.

Grade 3 serious AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were general physical health deterioration and myalgia. 

Micrograph showing MDS

VALENCIA, SPAIN—Phase 2 results suggest luspatercept can produce erythroid responses and enable transfusion independence in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Erythroid response rates were similar whether or not patients had received prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

However, patients without prior ESA exposure were more likely to achieve transfusion independence.

Most adverse events (AEs) considered possibly or probably related to luspatercept were grade 1 or 2.

Uwe Platzbecker, MD, of Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden, Germany, presented these results at the 14th International Symposium on MDS.

The research was sponsored by Acceleron Pharma Inc., the company developing luspatercept in collaboration with Celgene Corporation.

Dr Platzbecker explained that luspatercept, formerly ACE-536, is a modified activin receptor type IIB fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for GDF11 and other TGF-βfamily ligands to suppress Smad2/3 signaling.

He presented data from a phase 2 base study and an extension study of luspatercept. The base study included 89 patients who received luspatercept for 3 months. The long-term extension study included 52 patients who may receive luspatercept for an additional 5 years.

The patients received luspatercept at doses ranging from 0.125 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the base study and 1.0 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the extension study. They received the drug subcutaneously every 3 weeks.

There were 82 patients evaluable for efficacy. They were a median of 2.3 years from diagnosis (range, 0-14). Their median age was 72 (range, 29-90), 63% were male, and 52% had prior treatment with ESAs.

The outcome measures used in these studies were clinically meaningful erythroid hematologic improvement per the International Working Group’s criteria (IWG HI-E) and red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI).

IWG HI-E was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a transfusion burden at baseline of less than 4 RBC units every 8 weeks and baseline hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL. For patients with a greater transfusion burden at baseline, erythroid response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 RBC units sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

RBC-TI was defined as no RBC transfusions for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a baseline transfusion burden of at least 2 RBC units every 8 weeks.

Response data

In ESA-naïve patients, 48% (11/23) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (20/39) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

Among patients with prior ESA treatment, 33% (11/33) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (22/43) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

In patients with baseline erythropoietin (EPO) levels ≤ 500 international units per liter (IU/L), RBC-TI and IWG HI-E response rates were positive in both ring sideroblast-positive (RS+) and RS-negative (RS-) patients, according to the researchers.

*Table includes ESA-refractory and ESA-naïve patients. Patients treated at dose levels ≥ 0.75 mg/kg.

Safety data

All 89 patients were evaluable for safety. Common AEs (occurring in at least 3 patients) that were considered possibly or probably related to study drug were fatigue (6.7%), headache (6.7%), hypertension (5.6%), diarrhea (4.5%), arthralgia (3.4%), bone pain (3.4%), injection site erythema (3.4%), myalgia (3.4%), and peripheral edema (3.4%).

Grade 3 AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were ascites, blast cell count increase, blood bilirubin increase, hypertension, platelet count increase, and pleural effusion.

Grade 3 serious AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were general physical health deterioration and myalgia. 

Micrograph showing MDS

VALENCIA, SPAIN—Phase 2 results suggest luspatercept can produce erythroid responses and enable transfusion independence in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Erythroid response rates were similar whether or not patients had received prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

However, patients without prior ESA exposure were more likely to achieve transfusion independence.

Most adverse events (AEs) considered possibly or probably related to luspatercept were grade 1 or 2.

Uwe Platzbecker, MD, of Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus in Dresden, Germany, presented these results at the 14th International Symposium on MDS.

The research was sponsored by Acceleron Pharma Inc., the company developing luspatercept in collaboration with Celgene Corporation.

Dr Platzbecker explained that luspatercept, formerly ACE-536, is a modified activin receptor type IIB fusion protein that acts as a ligand trap for GDF11 and other TGF-βfamily ligands to suppress Smad2/3 signaling.

He presented data from a phase 2 base study and an extension study of luspatercept. The base study included 89 patients who received luspatercept for 3 months. The long-term extension study included 52 patients who may receive luspatercept for an additional 5 years.

The patients received luspatercept at doses ranging from 0.125 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the base study and 1.0 mg/kg to 1.75 mg/kg in the extension study. They received the drug subcutaneously every 3 weeks.

There were 82 patients evaluable for efficacy. They were a median of 2.3 years from diagnosis (range, 0-14). Their median age was 72 (range, 29-90), 63% were male, and 52% had prior treatment with ESAs.

The outcome measures used in these studies were clinically meaningful erythroid hematologic improvement per the International Working Group’s criteria (IWG HI-E) and red blood cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI).

IWG HI-E was defined as hemoglobin increase ≥ 1.5 g/dL sustained for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a transfusion burden at baseline of less than 4 RBC units every 8 weeks and baseline hemoglobin levels below 10 g/dL. For patients with a greater transfusion burden at baseline, erythroid response was defined as a reduction of ≥ 4 RBC units sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

RBC-TI was defined as no RBC transfusions for ≥ 8 weeks in patients with a baseline transfusion burden of at least 2 RBC units every 8 weeks.

Response data

In ESA-naïve patients, 48% (11/23) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (20/39) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

Among patients with prior ESA treatment, 33% (11/33) achieved RBC-TI with luspatercept, and 51% (22/43) achieved an IWG HI-E response.

In patients with baseline erythropoietin (EPO) levels ≤ 500 international units per liter (IU/L), RBC-TI and IWG HI-E response rates were positive in both ring sideroblast-positive (RS+) and RS-negative (RS-) patients, according to the researchers.

*Table includes ESA-refractory and ESA-naïve patients. Patients treated at dose levels ≥ 0.75 mg/kg.

Safety data

All 89 patients were evaluable for safety. Common AEs (occurring in at least 3 patients) that were considered possibly or probably related to study drug were fatigue (6.7%), headache (6.7%), hypertension (5.6%), diarrhea (4.5%), arthralgia (3.4%), bone pain (3.4%), injection site erythema (3.4%), myalgia (3.4%), and peripheral edema (3.4%).

Grade 3 AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were ascites, blast cell count increase, blood bilirubin increase, hypertension, platelet count increase, and pleural effusion.

Grade 3 serious AEs possibly or probably related to study drug were general physical health deterioration and myalgia. 

Photo courtesy of FDA

New research suggests postmarket safety events are common for therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Researchers evaluated more than 200 pharmaceuticals and biologics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010 and found that nearly a third of these products were affected by a postmarket safety event.

Most of the events were boxed warnings or safety communications, but there were a few products withdrawn from the market due to safety issues.

Joseph S. Ross, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers noted that most pivotal trials that form the basis for FDA approval enroll fewer than 1000 patients and have follow-up of 6 months or less.

Therefore, uncommon or long-term serious safety risks may only become evident after approval, when new therapeutics are used in larger patient populations and for longer periods of time.

With this in mind, Dr Ross and his colleagues examined postmarket safety events for all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 2001 and December 2010 (followed-up through February 2017).

Safety events included withdrawals due to safety concerns, FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and FDA issuance of safety communications.

From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics—183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics.

During a median follow-up of 11.7 years, there were 123 postmarket safety events—3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications.

“The fact that the FDA is issuing safety communications means it is doing a good job of following newly approved drugs and evaluating their safety up in the postmarket period,” Dr Ross said.

The 123 safety events identified affected 71 (32%) of the 222 therapeutics.

The median time from FDA approval to the first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years. And 31% of the therapeutics were still affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years.

The researchers found that postmarket safety events were significantly more frequent in biologics (P=0.03), drugs used to treat psychiatric disease (P<0.001), products approved near their regulatory deadline (P=0.008), and therapeutics granted accelerated approval (P=0.02).

“[The accelerated approval finding] shows that there is the potential for compromising patient safety when drug evaluation is persistently sped up,” Dr Ross said.

On the other hand, the researchers also found that postmarket safety events were significantly less frequent in therapeutics the FDA reviewed in less than 200 days (P=0.02).

The researchers said these findings should be interpreted cautiously, but they can be used to inform ongoing surveillance efforts. 

Photo courtesy of FDA

New research suggests postmarket safety events are common for therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Researchers evaluated more than 200 pharmaceuticals and biologics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010 and found that nearly a third of these products were affected by a postmarket safety event.

Most of the events were boxed warnings or safety communications, but there were a few products withdrawn from the market due to safety issues.

Joseph S. Ross, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers noted that most pivotal trials that form the basis for FDA approval enroll fewer than 1000 patients and have follow-up of 6 months or less.

Therefore, uncommon or long-term serious safety risks may only become evident after approval, when new therapeutics are used in larger patient populations and for longer periods of time.

With this in mind, Dr Ross and his colleagues examined postmarket safety events for all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 2001 and December 2010 (followed-up through February 2017).

Safety events included withdrawals due to safety concerns, FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and FDA issuance of safety communications.

From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics—183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics.

During a median follow-up of 11.7 years, there were 123 postmarket safety events—3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications.

“The fact that the FDA is issuing safety communications means it is doing a good job of following newly approved drugs and evaluating their safety up in the postmarket period,” Dr Ross said.

The 123 safety events identified affected 71 (32%) of the 222 therapeutics.

The median time from FDA approval to the first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years. And 31% of the therapeutics were still affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years.

The researchers found that postmarket safety events were significantly more frequent in biologics (P=0.03), drugs used to treat psychiatric disease (P<0.001), products approved near their regulatory deadline (P=0.008), and therapeutics granted accelerated approval (P=0.02).

“[The accelerated approval finding] shows that there is the potential for compromising patient safety when drug evaluation is persistently sped up,” Dr Ross said.

On the other hand, the researchers also found that postmarket safety events were significantly less frequent in therapeutics the FDA reviewed in less than 200 days (P=0.02).

The researchers said these findings should be interpreted cautiously, but they can be used to inform ongoing surveillance efforts. 

Photo courtesy of FDA

New research suggests postmarket safety events are common for therapeutics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Researchers evaluated more than 200 pharmaceuticals and biologics approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010 and found that nearly a third of these products were affected by a postmarket safety event.

Most of the events were boxed warnings or safety communications, but there were a few products withdrawn from the market due to safety issues.

Joseph S. Ross, MD, of the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, and his colleagues reported these findings in JAMA.

The researchers noted that most pivotal trials that form the basis for FDA approval enroll fewer than 1000 patients and have follow-up of 6 months or less.

Therefore, uncommon or long-term serious safety risks may only become evident after approval, when new therapeutics are used in larger patient populations and for longer periods of time.

With this in mind, Dr Ross and his colleagues examined postmarket safety events for all novel therapeutics approved by the FDA between January 2001 and December 2010 (followed-up through February 2017).

Safety events included withdrawals due to safety concerns, FDA issuance of incremental boxed warnings added in the postmarket period, and FDA issuance of safety communications.

From 2001 through 2010, the FDA approved 222 novel therapeutics—183 pharmaceuticals and 39 biologics.

During a median follow-up of 11.7 years, there were 123 postmarket safety events—3 withdrawals, 61 boxed warnings, and 59 safety communications.

“The fact that the FDA is issuing safety communications means it is doing a good job of following newly approved drugs and evaluating their safety up in the postmarket period,” Dr Ross said.

The 123 safety events identified affected 71 (32%) of the 222 therapeutics.

The median time from FDA approval to the first postmarket safety event was 4.2 years. And 31% of the therapeutics were still affected by a postmarket safety event at 10 years.

The researchers found that postmarket safety events were significantly more frequent in biologics (P=0.03), drugs used to treat psychiatric disease (P<0.001), products approved near their regulatory deadline (P=0.008), and therapeutics granted accelerated approval (P=0.02).

“[The accelerated approval finding] shows that there is the potential for compromising patient safety when drug evaluation is persistently sped up,” Dr Ross said.

On the other hand, the researchers also found that postmarket safety events were significantly less frequent in therapeutics the FDA reviewed in less than 200 days (P=0.02).

The researchers said these findings should be interpreted cautiously, but they can be used to inform ongoing surveillance efforts. 

IN THIS ARTICLE

• Staging endometriosis
• Medications for treating endometriosis
• Complications

Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder characterized by the presence and growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity (ie, endometrial implants), most commonly found on the ovaries. Although its pathophysiology is not completely understood, the disease is associated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility.^1,2 Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disorder, predominantly affecting women of childbearing age. It occurs in 10% to 15% of the general female population, but prevalence is even higher (35% to 50%) among women who experience pelvic pain and/or infertility.^1-4 Although endometriosis mainly affects women in their mid-to-late 20s, it can also manifest in adolescence.^3,5 Nearly half of all adolescents with intractable dysmenorrhea are diagnosed with endometriosis.⁵

ETIOLOGY

The etiology of endometriosis, while not completely understood, is likely multifactorial. Factors that may influence its development include gene expression, tissue response to hormones, neuronal tissue involvement, lack of protective factors, inflammation, and cellular oxidative stress.^6,7

Several theories regarding the etiology of endometriosis have been proposed; the most widely accepted is the transplantation theory, which suggests that endometriosis results from retrograde flow of menstrual tissue through the fallopian tubes. During menstruation, fragments of the endometrium are driven through the fallopian tubes and into the pelvic cavity, where they can implant onto the pelvic structures, leading to further growth and invasion.^2,6,8 Women who have polymenorrhea, prolonged menses, and early menarche therefore have an increased risk for endometriosis.⁸ This theory does not account for the fact that although nearly 90% of women have some elements of retrograde menstrual flow, only a fraction of them develop endometriosis.⁶

Two other plausible explanations are the coelomic metaplasia and embryonic rest theories. In the coelomic metaplasia theory, the mesothelium (coelomic epithelium)—which encases the ovaries—invaginates into the ovaries and undergoes a metaplastic change to endometrial tissue. This could explain the development of endometriosis in patients with the congenital malformation Müllerian agenesis. In the embryonic rest theory, Müllerian remnants in the rectovaginal area, left behind by the Müllerian duct system, have the potential to differentiate into endometrial tissue.^2,5,6,8

Another theory involving lymphatic or hematologic spread has been proposed, which would explain the presence of endometrial implants at sites distant from the uterus (eg, the pleural cavity and brain). However, this theory is not widely understood.⁶

The two most recent hypotheses on endometriosis are associated with an abnormal immune system and a possible genetic predisposition. The peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis has different levels of prostanoids, cytokines, growth factors, and interleukins than that of women who do not have the condition. It is uncertain whether the relationship between peritoneal fluid changes and endometriosis is causal.⁶ A genetic correlation has been suggested, based on an increased prevalence of endometriosis in women with an affected first-degree relative; in a case-control study on family incidence of endometriosis, 5.9% to 9.6% of first-degree relatives and 1.3% of second-degree relatives were affected.⁹ The Oxford Endometriosis Gene (OXEGENE) study is currently investigating susceptible loci for endometriosis genes, which could provide a better understanding of the disease process.⁶

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The most common symptoms of endometriosis are dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility, but 20% to 25% of affected women are asymptomatic.^4,10,11 Pelvic pain in women most often heralds onset of menses and worsens during menstruation.¹ Other symptoms include back pain, dyschezia, dysuria, nausea, lethargy, and chronic fatigue.^4,8,10

Endometriosis is concomitant with infertility; endometrial adhesions that attach to pelvic organs cause distortion of pelvic structures and impaired ovum release and pick-up, and are believed to reduce fecundity. Additionally, women with endometriosis have low ovarian reserve and low-quality oocytes.^6,8 Altered chemical elements (ie, prostanoids, cytokines, growth factors, and interleukins) may also contribute to endometrial-related infertility; intrapelvic growth factors could affect the fallopian tubes or pelvic environment, and thus the oocytes in a similar fashion.⁶

In adolescents, endometriosis can present as cyclic or acyclic pain; severe dysmenorrhea; dysmenorrhea that responds poorly to medications (eg, oral contraceptive pills [OCPs] or NSAIDs); and prolonged menstruation with premenstrual spotting.¹

The physical exam may reveal tender nodules in the posterior vaginal fornix; cervical motion tenderness; a fixed uterus, cervix, or adnexa; uterine motion tenderness; thickening, pain, tenderness, or nodularity of the uterosacral ligament; or tender adnexal masses due to endometriomas.^8,10

PATHOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS AND STAGING

Gross pathology of endometriosis varies based on duration of disease and depth of implants or lesions. Implants range from punctate foci to small stellate patches that vary in color but typically measure less than 2 cm. They manifest most commonly in the ovaries, followed by the anterior and posterior cul-de-sac, posterior broad ligament, and uterosacral ligament. Implants can also be located on the uterus, fallopian tubes, sigmoid colon, ureter, small intestine, lungs, and brain (see Figure).³

Due to recurrent cyclic hemorrhage within a deep implant, endometriomas typically appear in the ovaries, entirely replacing normal ovarian tissue. Endometriomas are composed of dark, thick, degenerated blood products that result in a brown cyst—hence their designation as chocolate cysts. Microscopically, they are comprised of endometrial glands, stroma, and sometimes smooth muscle.³

Staging of endometriosis is determined by the volume, depth, location, and size of the implants (see Table 1). It is important to note that staging does not necessarily reflect symptom severity.¹²

DIAGNOSIS

There are several approaches to the diagnostic evaluation of endometriosis, all of which should be guided by the clinical presentation and physical examination. Clinical characteristics can be nonspecific and highly variable, warranting more reliable diagnostic methods.

Laparoscopy is the diagnostic gold standard for endometriosis, and biopsy of implants revealing endometrial tissue is confirmatory. Less invasive diagnostic methods include ultrasound and MRI—but without confirmatory histologic sampling, these only yield a presumptive diagnosis.

With ultrasonography, a transvaginal approach should be taken. While endometriomas have a variety of presentations on ultrasound, most appear as a homogenous, hypoechoic, focal lesion within the ovary. MRI has greater specificity than ultrasound for diagnosis of endometriomas. However, “shading,” or loss of signal, within an endometrioma is a feature commonly found on MRI.³

Other tests that aid in the diagnosis, but are not definitive, include sedimentation rate and tumor marker CA-125. These are both commonly elevated in patients with endometriosis. Measurement of CA-125 is helpful for identifying patients with infertility and severe endometriosis, who would therefore benefit from early surgical intervention.⁸

TREATMENT

There is no permanent cure for endometriosis; treatment entails nonsurgical and surgical approaches to symptom resolution. Treatment is directed by the patient’s desire to maintain fertility.

Conservative treatment of pelvic pain with NSAIDs is a common approach. Progestins are also used to treat pelvic pain; they create an acyclic, hypo-estrogenic environment by blocking ovarian estrogen secretion and subsequent endometrial cell proliferation. In addition to alleviating pain, progestins also prevent disease recurrence after surgery.^2,13 Options include combination OCPs, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and etonogestrel implants. Combination OCPs and medroxyprogesterone acetate are considered to be firstline treatment.⁸

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a), such as leuprolide acetate, and androgenic agents, such as danocrine, are also indicated for relief of pain resulting from biopsy-confirmed endometriosis. Danocrine has been shown to ameliorate pain in up to 92% of patients.^3,8 Other unconventional treatment modalities include aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators, anti-inflammatory agents, and immunomodulators.² For an outline of the medication choices and their mechanisms of action, see Table 2.

Surgery, or ablation of the implants, is another viable treatment option; it can be performed via laparoscopy or laparotomy. Although the success rate is high, implants recur in 28% of patients 18 months after surgery and in 40% of patients after nine years; 40% to 50% of patients have adhesion recurrence.³

Patients who have concomitant infertility can be treated with advanced reproductive techniques, including intrauterine insemination and ovarian hyperstimulation. The monthly fecundity rate with such techniques is 9% to 18%.³ Laparoscopic surgery with ablation of endometrial implants may increase fertility in patients with endometriosis.⁸

Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are definitive treatment options reserved for patients with intractable pain and those who do not wish to maintain fertility.^3,8 Recurrent symptoms occur in 10% of patients 10 years after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, compared with 62% of those who have hysterectomy alone.⁸ Complete surgical removal of endometriomas, and ovary if affected, can reduce risk for epithelial ovarian cancer in the future.²

COMPLICATIONS

Adhesions are a common complication of endometriosis. Ultrasound can be used for diagnosis and to determine whether pelvic organs are fixed (ie, fixed retroverted uterus). MRI may also be used; adhesions appear as “speculated low-signal-intensity stranding that obscures organ interfaces.”³ Other suggestive findings on MRI include posterior displacement of the pelvic organs, elevation of the posterior vaginal fornix, hydrosalpinx, loculated fluid collections, and angulated bowel loops.³

Malignant transformation is rare, affecting fewer than 1% of patients with endometriosis. Most malignancies arise from ovarian endometriosis and can be related to unopposed estrogen therapy; they are typically large and have a solid component. The most common endometriosis-related malignant neoplasm is endometrioid carcinoma, followed by clear-cell carcinoma.³

CONCLUSION

Patients with endometriosis often present with complaints such as dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain, but surgical and histologic findings indicate that symptom severity does not necessarily equate to disease severity. Definitive diagnosis requires an invasive surgical procedure.

In the absence of a cure, endometriosis treatment focuses on symptom control and improvement in quality of life. Familiarity with the disease process and knowledge of treatment options will help health care providers achieve this goal for patients who experience the potentially life-altering effects of endometriosis.

IN THIS ARTICLE

• Staging endometriosis
• Medications for treating endometriosis
• Complications

Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder characterized by the presence and growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity (ie, endometrial implants), most commonly found on the ovaries. Although its pathophysiology is not completely understood, the disease is associated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility.^1,2 Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disorder, predominantly affecting women of childbearing age. It occurs in 10% to 15% of the general female population, but prevalence is even higher (35% to 50%) among women who experience pelvic pain and/or infertility.^1-4 Although endometriosis mainly affects women in their mid-to-late 20s, it can also manifest in adolescence.^3,5 Nearly half of all adolescents with intractable dysmenorrhea are diagnosed with endometriosis.⁵

ETIOLOGY

The etiology of endometriosis, while not completely understood, is likely multifactorial. Factors that may influence its development include gene expression, tissue response to hormones, neuronal tissue involvement, lack of protective factors, inflammation, and cellular oxidative stress.^6,7

Several theories regarding the etiology of endometriosis have been proposed; the most widely accepted is the transplantation theory, which suggests that endometriosis results from retrograde flow of menstrual tissue through the fallopian tubes. During menstruation, fragments of the endometrium are driven through the fallopian tubes and into the pelvic cavity, where they can implant onto the pelvic structures, leading to further growth and invasion.^2,6,8 Women who have polymenorrhea, prolonged menses, and early menarche therefore have an increased risk for endometriosis.⁸ This theory does not account for the fact that although nearly 90% of women have some elements of retrograde menstrual flow, only a fraction of them develop endometriosis.⁶

Two other plausible explanations are the coelomic metaplasia and embryonic rest theories. In the coelomic metaplasia theory, the mesothelium (coelomic epithelium)—which encases the ovaries—invaginates into the ovaries and undergoes a metaplastic change to endometrial tissue. This could explain the development of endometriosis in patients with the congenital malformation Müllerian agenesis. In the embryonic rest theory, Müllerian remnants in the rectovaginal area, left behind by the Müllerian duct system, have the potential to differentiate into endometrial tissue.^2,5,6,8

Another theory involving lymphatic or hematologic spread has been proposed, which would explain the presence of endometrial implants at sites distant from the uterus (eg, the pleural cavity and brain). However, this theory is not widely understood.⁶

The two most recent hypotheses on endometriosis are associated with an abnormal immune system and a possible genetic predisposition. The peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis has different levels of prostanoids, cytokines, growth factors, and interleukins than that of women who do not have the condition. It is uncertain whether the relationship between peritoneal fluid changes and endometriosis is causal.⁶ A genetic correlation has been suggested, based on an increased prevalence of endometriosis in women with an affected first-degree relative; in a case-control study on family incidence of endometriosis, 5.9% to 9.6% of first-degree relatives and 1.3% of second-degree relatives were affected.⁹ The Oxford Endometriosis Gene (OXEGENE) study is currently investigating susceptible loci for endometriosis genes, which could provide a better understanding of the disease process.⁶

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The most common symptoms of endometriosis are dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility, but 20% to 25% of affected women are asymptomatic.^4,10,11 Pelvic pain in women most often heralds onset of menses and worsens during menstruation.¹ Other symptoms include back pain, dyschezia, dysuria, nausea, lethargy, and chronic fatigue.^4,8,10

Endometriosis is concomitant with infertility; endometrial adhesions that attach to pelvic organs cause distortion of pelvic structures and impaired ovum release and pick-up, and are believed to reduce fecundity. Additionally, women with endometriosis have low ovarian reserve and low-quality oocytes.^6,8 Altered chemical elements (ie, prostanoids, cytokines, growth factors, and interleukins) may also contribute to endometrial-related infertility; intrapelvic growth factors could affect the fallopian tubes or pelvic environment, and thus the oocytes in a similar fashion.⁶

In adolescents, endometriosis can present as cyclic or acyclic pain; severe dysmenorrhea; dysmenorrhea that responds poorly to medications (eg, oral contraceptive pills [OCPs] or NSAIDs); and prolonged menstruation with premenstrual spotting.¹

The physical exam may reveal tender nodules in the posterior vaginal fornix; cervical motion tenderness; a fixed uterus, cervix, or adnexa; uterine motion tenderness; thickening, pain, tenderness, or nodularity of the uterosacral ligament; or tender adnexal masses due to endometriomas.^8,10

PATHOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS AND STAGING

Gross pathology of endometriosis varies based on duration of disease and depth of implants or lesions. Implants range from punctate foci to small stellate patches that vary in color but typically measure less than 2 cm. They manifest most commonly in the ovaries, followed by the anterior and posterior cul-de-sac, posterior broad ligament, and uterosacral ligament. Implants can also be located on the uterus, fallopian tubes, sigmoid colon, ureter, small intestine, lungs, and brain (see Figure).³

Due to recurrent cyclic hemorrhage within a deep implant, endometriomas typically appear in the ovaries, entirely replacing normal ovarian tissue. Endometriomas are composed of dark, thick, degenerated blood products that result in a brown cyst—hence their designation as chocolate cysts. Microscopically, they are comprised of endometrial glands, stroma, and sometimes smooth muscle.³

Staging of endometriosis is determined by the volume, depth, location, and size of the implants (see Table 1). It is important to note that staging does not necessarily reflect symptom severity.¹²

DIAGNOSIS

There are several approaches to the diagnostic evaluation of endometriosis, all of which should be guided by the clinical presentation and physical examination. Clinical characteristics can be nonspecific and highly variable, warranting more reliable diagnostic methods.

Laparoscopy is the diagnostic gold standard for endometriosis, and biopsy of implants revealing endometrial tissue is confirmatory. Less invasive diagnostic methods include ultrasound and MRI—but without confirmatory histologic sampling, these only yield a presumptive diagnosis.

With ultrasonography, a transvaginal approach should be taken. While endometriomas have a variety of presentations on ultrasound, most appear as a homogenous, hypoechoic, focal lesion within the ovary. MRI has greater specificity than ultrasound for diagnosis of endometriomas. However, “shading,” or loss of signal, within an endometrioma is a feature commonly found on MRI.³

Other tests that aid in the diagnosis, but are not definitive, include sedimentation rate and tumor marker CA-125. These are both commonly elevated in patients with endometriosis. Measurement of CA-125 is helpful for identifying patients with infertility and severe endometriosis, who would therefore benefit from early surgical intervention.⁸

TREATMENT

There is no permanent cure for endometriosis; treatment entails nonsurgical and surgical approaches to symptom resolution. Treatment is directed by the patient’s desire to maintain fertility.

Conservative treatment of pelvic pain with NSAIDs is a common approach. Progestins are also used to treat pelvic pain; they create an acyclic, hypo-estrogenic environment by blocking ovarian estrogen secretion and subsequent endometrial cell proliferation. In addition to alleviating pain, progestins also prevent disease recurrence after surgery.^2,13 Options include combination OCPs, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and etonogestrel implants. Combination OCPs and medroxyprogesterone acetate are considered to be firstline treatment.⁸

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a), such as leuprolide acetate, and androgenic agents, such as danocrine, are also indicated for relief of pain resulting from biopsy-confirmed endometriosis. Danocrine has been shown to ameliorate pain in up to 92% of patients.^3,8 Other unconventional treatment modalities include aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators, anti-inflammatory agents, and immunomodulators.² For an outline of the medication choices and their mechanisms of action, see Table 2.

Surgery, or ablation of the implants, is another viable treatment option; it can be performed via laparoscopy or laparotomy. Although the success rate is high, implants recur in 28% of patients 18 months after surgery and in 40% of patients after nine years; 40% to 50% of patients have adhesion recurrence.³

Patients who have concomitant infertility can be treated with advanced reproductive techniques, including intrauterine insemination and ovarian hyperstimulation. The monthly fecundity rate with such techniques is 9% to 18%.³ Laparoscopic surgery with ablation of endometrial implants may increase fertility in patients with endometriosis.⁸

Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are definitive treatment options reserved for patients with intractable pain and those who do not wish to maintain fertility.^3,8 Recurrent symptoms occur in 10% of patients 10 years after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, compared with 62% of those who have hysterectomy alone.⁸ Complete surgical removal of endometriomas, and ovary if affected, can reduce risk for epithelial ovarian cancer in the future.²

COMPLICATIONS

Adhesions are a common complication of endometriosis. Ultrasound can be used for diagnosis and to determine whether pelvic organs are fixed (ie, fixed retroverted uterus). MRI may also be used; adhesions appear as “speculated low-signal-intensity stranding that obscures organ interfaces.”³ Other suggestive findings on MRI include posterior displacement of the pelvic organs, elevation of the posterior vaginal fornix, hydrosalpinx, loculated fluid collections, and angulated bowel loops.³

Malignant transformation is rare, affecting fewer than 1% of patients with endometriosis. Most malignancies arise from ovarian endometriosis and can be related to unopposed estrogen therapy; they are typically large and have a solid component. The most common endometriosis-related malignant neoplasm is endometrioid carcinoma, followed by clear-cell carcinoma.³

CONCLUSION

Patients with endometriosis often present with complaints such as dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain, but surgical and histologic findings indicate that symptom severity does not necessarily equate to disease severity. Definitive diagnosis requires an invasive surgical procedure.

In the absence of a cure, endometriosis treatment focuses on symptom control and improvement in quality of life. Familiarity with the disease process and knowledge of treatment options will help health care providers achieve this goal for patients who experience the potentially life-altering effects of endometriosis.

IN THIS ARTICLE

• Staging endometriosis
• Medications for treating endometriosis
• Complications

Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder characterized by the presence and growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity (ie, endometrial implants), most commonly found on the ovaries. Although its pathophysiology is not completely understood, the disease is associated with dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility.^1,2 Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent disorder, predominantly affecting women of childbearing age. It occurs in 10% to 15% of the general female population, but prevalence is even higher (35% to 50%) among women who experience pelvic pain and/or infertility.^1-4 Although endometriosis mainly affects women in their mid-to-late 20s, it can also manifest in adolescence.^3,5 Nearly half of all adolescents with intractable dysmenorrhea are diagnosed with endometriosis.⁵

ETIOLOGY

The etiology of endometriosis, while not completely understood, is likely multifactorial. Factors that may influence its development include gene expression, tissue response to hormones, neuronal tissue involvement, lack of protective factors, inflammation, and cellular oxidative stress.^6,7

Several theories regarding the etiology of endometriosis have been proposed; the most widely accepted is the transplantation theory, which suggests that endometriosis results from retrograde flow of menstrual tissue through the fallopian tubes. During menstruation, fragments of the endometrium are driven through the fallopian tubes and into the pelvic cavity, where they can implant onto the pelvic structures, leading to further growth and invasion.^2,6,8 Women who have polymenorrhea, prolonged menses, and early menarche therefore have an increased risk for endometriosis.⁸ This theory does not account for the fact that although nearly 90% of women have some elements of retrograde menstrual flow, only a fraction of them develop endometriosis.⁶

Two other plausible explanations are the coelomic metaplasia and embryonic rest theories. In the coelomic metaplasia theory, the mesothelium (coelomic epithelium)—which encases the ovaries—invaginates into the ovaries and undergoes a metaplastic change to endometrial tissue. This could explain the development of endometriosis in patients with the congenital malformation Müllerian agenesis. In the embryonic rest theory, Müllerian remnants in the rectovaginal area, left behind by the Müllerian duct system, have the potential to differentiate into endometrial tissue.^2,5,6,8

Another theory involving lymphatic or hematologic spread has been proposed, which would explain the presence of endometrial implants at sites distant from the uterus (eg, the pleural cavity and brain). However, this theory is not widely understood.⁶

The two most recent hypotheses on endometriosis are associated with an abnormal immune system and a possible genetic predisposition. The peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis has different levels of prostanoids, cytokines, growth factors, and interleukins than that of women who do not have the condition. It is uncertain whether the relationship between peritoneal fluid changes and endometriosis is causal.⁶ A genetic correlation has been suggested, based on an increased prevalence of endometriosis in women with an affected first-degree relative; in a case-control study on family incidence of endometriosis, 5.9% to 9.6% of first-degree relatives and 1.3% of second-degree relatives were affected.⁹ The Oxford Endometriosis Gene (OXEGENE) study is currently investigating susceptible loci for endometriosis genes, which could provide a better understanding of the disease process.⁶

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The most common symptoms of endometriosis are dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility, but 20% to 25% of affected women are asymptomatic.^4,10,11 Pelvic pain in women most often heralds onset of menses and worsens during menstruation.¹ Other symptoms include back pain, dyschezia, dysuria, nausea, lethargy, and chronic fatigue.^4,8,10

Endometriosis is concomitant with infertility; endometrial adhesions that attach to pelvic organs cause distortion of pelvic structures and impaired ovum release and pick-up, and are believed to reduce fecundity. Additionally, women with endometriosis have low ovarian reserve and low-quality oocytes.^6,8 Altered chemical elements (ie, prostanoids, cytokines, growth factors, and interleukins) may also contribute to endometrial-related infertility; intrapelvic growth factors could affect the fallopian tubes or pelvic environment, and thus the oocytes in a similar fashion.⁶

In adolescents, endometriosis can present as cyclic or acyclic pain; severe dysmenorrhea; dysmenorrhea that responds poorly to medications (eg, oral contraceptive pills [OCPs] or NSAIDs); and prolonged menstruation with premenstrual spotting.¹

The physical exam may reveal tender nodules in the posterior vaginal fornix; cervical motion tenderness; a fixed uterus, cervix, or adnexa; uterine motion tenderness; thickening, pain, tenderness, or nodularity of the uterosacral ligament; or tender adnexal masses due to endometriomas.^8,10

PATHOLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS AND STAGING

Gross pathology of endometriosis varies based on duration of disease and depth of implants or lesions. Implants range from punctate foci to small stellate patches that vary in color but typically measure less than 2 cm. They manifest most commonly in the ovaries, followed by the anterior and posterior cul-de-sac, posterior broad ligament, and uterosacral ligament. Implants can also be located on the uterus, fallopian tubes, sigmoid colon, ureter, small intestine, lungs, and brain (see Figure).³

Due to recurrent cyclic hemorrhage within a deep implant, endometriomas typically appear in the ovaries, entirely replacing normal ovarian tissue. Endometriomas are composed of dark, thick, degenerated blood products that result in a brown cyst—hence their designation as chocolate cysts. Microscopically, they are comprised of endometrial glands, stroma, and sometimes smooth muscle.³

Staging of endometriosis is determined by the volume, depth, location, and size of the implants (see Table 1). It is important to note that staging does not necessarily reflect symptom severity.¹²

DIAGNOSIS

There are several approaches to the diagnostic evaluation of endometriosis, all of which should be guided by the clinical presentation and physical examination. Clinical characteristics can be nonspecific and highly variable, warranting more reliable diagnostic methods.

Laparoscopy is the diagnostic gold standard for endometriosis, and biopsy of implants revealing endometrial tissue is confirmatory. Less invasive diagnostic methods include ultrasound and MRI—but without confirmatory histologic sampling, these only yield a presumptive diagnosis.

With ultrasonography, a transvaginal approach should be taken. While endometriomas have a variety of presentations on ultrasound, most appear as a homogenous, hypoechoic, focal lesion within the ovary. MRI has greater specificity than ultrasound for diagnosis of endometriomas. However, “shading,” or loss of signal, within an endometrioma is a feature commonly found on MRI.³

Other tests that aid in the diagnosis, but are not definitive, include sedimentation rate and tumor marker CA-125. These are both commonly elevated in patients with endometriosis. Measurement of CA-125 is helpful for identifying patients with infertility and severe endometriosis, who would therefore benefit from early surgical intervention.⁸

TREATMENT

There is no permanent cure for endometriosis; treatment entails nonsurgical and surgical approaches to symptom resolution. Treatment is directed by the patient’s desire to maintain fertility.

Conservative treatment of pelvic pain with NSAIDs is a common approach. Progestins are also used to treat pelvic pain; they create an acyclic, hypo-estrogenic environment by blocking ovarian estrogen secretion and subsequent endometrial cell proliferation. In addition to alleviating pain, progestins also prevent disease recurrence after surgery.^2,13 Options include combination OCPs, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and etonogestrel implants. Combination OCPs and medroxyprogesterone acetate are considered to be firstline treatment.⁸

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRH-a), such as leuprolide acetate, and androgenic agents, such as danocrine, are also indicated for relief of pain resulting from biopsy-confirmed endometriosis. Danocrine has been shown to ameliorate pain in up to 92% of patients.^3,8 Other unconventional treatment modalities include aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators, anti-inflammatory agents, and immunomodulators.² For an outline of the medication choices and their mechanisms of action, see Table 2.

Surgery, or ablation of the implants, is another viable treatment option; it can be performed via laparoscopy or laparotomy. Although the success rate is high, implants recur in 28% of patients 18 months after surgery and in 40% of patients after nine years; 40% to 50% of patients have adhesion recurrence.³

Patients who have concomitant infertility can be treated with advanced reproductive techniques, including intrauterine insemination and ovarian hyperstimulation. The monthly fecundity rate with such techniques is 9% to 18%.³ Laparoscopic surgery with ablation of endometrial implants may increase fertility in patients with endometriosis.⁸

Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy are definitive treatment options reserved for patients with intractable pain and those who do not wish to maintain fertility.^3,8 Recurrent symptoms occur in 10% of patients 10 years after hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy, compared with 62% of those who have hysterectomy alone.⁸ Complete surgical removal of endometriomas, and ovary if affected, can reduce risk for epithelial ovarian cancer in the future.²

COMPLICATIONS

Adhesions are a common complication of endometriosis. Ultrasound can be used for diagnosis and to determine whether pelvic organs are fixed (ie, fixed retroverted uterus). MRI may also be used; adhesions appear as “speculated low-signal-intensity stranding that obscures organ interfaces.”³ Other suggestive findings on MRI include posterior displacement of the pelvic organs, elevation of the posterior vaginal fornix, hydrosalpinx, loculated fluid collections, and angulated bowel loops.³

Malignant transformation is rare, affecting fewer than 1% of patients with endometriosis. Most malignancies arise from ovarian endometriosis and can be related to unopposed estrogen therapy; they are typically large and have a solid component. The most common endometriosis-related malignant neoplasm is endometrioid carcinoma, followed by clear-cell carcinoma.³

CONCLUSION

Patients with endometriosis often present with complaints such as dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain, but surgical and histologic findings indicate that symptom severity does not necessarily equate to disease severity. Definitive diagnosis requires an invasive surgical procedure.

In the absence of a cure, endometriosis treatment focuses on symptom control and improvement in quality of life. Familiarity with the disease process and knowledge of treatment options will help health care providers achieve this goal for patients who experience the potentially life-altering effects of endometriosis.

Aluminum hydroxide–adjuvanted vaccines with reduced doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV-Al) were noninferior to standard inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in a large trial in the Dominican Republic, said Luis Rivera, MD, of the Hospital Maternidad Nuestra Señora de la Altagracia, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and his associates.

If these findings are replicated in phase III trials and regulatory approval follows, such vaccines could be low-cost replacements for standard IPV and oral poliovirus vaccines in low-resource countries, the study authors suggested.

designer491/Thinkstock

[email protected]

Aluminum hydroxide–adjuvanted vaccines with reduced doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV-Al) were noninferior to standard inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in a large trial in the Dominican Republic, said Luis Rivera, MD, of the Hospital Maternidad Nuestra Señora de la Altagracia, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and his associates.

If these findings are replicated in phase III trials and regulatory approval follows, such vaccines could be low-cost replacements for standard IPV and oral poliovirus vaccines in low-resource countries, the study authors suggested.

designer491/Thinkstock

[email protected]

Aluminum hydroxide–adjuvanted vaccines with reduced doses of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV-Al) were noninferior to standard inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) in a large trial in the Dominican Republic, said Luis Rivera, MD, of the Hospital Maternidad Nuestra Señora de la Altagracia, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and his associates.

If these findings are replicated in phase III trials and regulatory approval follows, such vaccines could be low-cost replacements for standard IPV and oral poliovirus vaccines in low-resource countries, the study authors suggested.

designer491/Thinkstock

[email protected]

SYDNEY – Think twice before prescribing oral steroids for patients who have urticarial dermatitis, diarrhea, and cough, especially if they have lived in or recently traveled to tropical areas, Ian McCrossin, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Australasian College of Dermatologists.

Strongyloides stercoralis, or threadworm, infection can flare dramatically when patients take oral steroids. “You get thousands of worms, and they punch their way through the bowel wall and take the bowel organisms with them; that’s when you get septicaemia,” Dr. McCrossin, a dermatologist from Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, said in an interview.

SYDNEY – Think twice before prescribing oral steroids for patients who have urticarial dermatitis, diarrhea, and cough, especially if they have lived in or recently traveled to tropical areas, Ian McCrossin, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Australasian College of Dermatologists.

Strongyloides stercoralis, or threadworm, infection can flare dramatically when patients take oral steroids. “You get thousands of worms, and they punch their way through the bowel wall and take the bowel organisms with them; that’s when you get septicaemia,” Dr. McCrossin, a dermatologist from Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, said in an interview.

SYDNEY – Think twice before prescribing oral steroids for patients who have urticarial dermatitis, diarrhea, and cough, especially if they have lived in or recently traveled to tropical areas, Ian McCrossin, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Australasian College of Dermatologists.

Strongyloides stercoralis, or threadworm, infection can flare dramatically when patients take oral steroids. “You get thousands of worms, and they punch their way through the bowel wall and take the bowel organisms with them; that’s when you get septicaemia,” Dr. McCrossin, a dermatologist from Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, said in an interview.

PORTLAND, ORE. – Clinicians who treat or diagnose ANCA-associated vasculitis should watch for a variety of skin lesions, which can signify severe systemic manifestations of disease, according to the results of a cross-sectional study of 1,184 patients from 130 centers worldwide.

Among patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), the presence of skin lesions approximately doubled the likelihood of renal, pulmonary, neurologic, or other severe systemic manifestations of ANCA-associated vasculitis (hazard ratios, 2.0; P less than .03).

PORTLAND, ORE. – Clinicians who treat or diagnose ANCA-associated vasculitis should watch for a variety of skin lesions, which can signify severe systemic manifestations of disease, according to the results of a cross-sectional study of 1,184 patients from 130 centers worldwide.

Among patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), the presence of skin lesions approximately doubled the likelihood of renal, pulmonary, neurologic, or other severe systemic manifestations of ANCA-associated vasculitis (hazard ratios, 2.0; P less than .03).

PORTLAND, ORE. – Clinicians who treat or diagnose ANCA-associated vasculitis should watch for a variety of skin lesions, which can signify severe systemic manifestations of disease, according to the results of a cross-sectional study of 1,184 patients from 130 centers worldwide.

Among patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), the presence of skin lesions approximately doubled the likelihood of renal, pulmonary, neurologic, or other severe systemic manifestations of ANCA-associated vasculitis (hazard ratios, 2.0; P less than .03).

The Food and Drug Administration has granted accelerated approval to avelumab for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Approval was based on a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 16.1% in 26 patients who had been followed for at least 6 months in a single-arm, multicenter study that enrolled 242 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed following platinum-containing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The ORR was 13.3% among 30 patients who had been followed for at least 13 weeks. Median time to response was 2.0 months (range 1.3-11.0). The median response duration had not been reached in patients followed for at least 13 weeks or at least 6 months, but ranged from 1.4+ to 17.4+ months in both groups, the FDA said in a statement.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has granted accelerated approval to avelumab for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Approval was based on a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 16.1% in 26 patients who had been followed for at least 6 months in a single-arm, multicenter study that enrolled 242 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed following platinum-containing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The ORR was 13.3% among 30 patients who had been followed for at least 13 weeks. Median time to response was 2.0 months (range 1.3-11.0). The median response duration had not been reached in patients followed for at least 13 weeks or at least 6 months, but ranged from 1.4+ to 17.4+ months in both groups, the FDA said in a statement.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has granted accelerated approval to avelumab for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy.

Approval was based on a confirmed overall response rate (ORR) of 16.1% in 26 patients who had been followed for at least 6 months in a single-arm, multicenter study that enrolled 242 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma whose disease progressed following platinum-containing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The ORR was 13.3% among 30 patients who had been followed for at least 13 weeks. Median time to response was 2.0 months (range 1.3-11.0). The median response duration had not been reached in patients followed for at least 13 weeks or at least 6 months, but ranged from 1.4+ to 17.4+ months in both groups, the FDA said in a statement.

[email protected]

VIENNA – Two infusions of the long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic dalbavancin showed a favorable clinical benefit for treatment of adult osteomyelitis in a phase II study.

Dalbavancin (Dalvance) showed positive results while avoiding the complexities of standard therapies that require longer, more frequent dosing, Urania Rappo, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Dalbavancin already is approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and its long terminal half-life of 14 days and high bone penetration made it a natural candidate for evaluation in the treatment of osteomyelitis, said Dr. Rappo, director of clinical development (anti-infectives) at Allergan, which markets the drug and sponsored the study.

Michele G. Sullivan/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

On Twitter @alz_gal

VIENNA – Two infusions of the long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic dalbavancin showed a favorable clinical benefit for treatment of adult osteomyelitis in a phase II study.

Dalbavancin (Dalvance) showed positive results while avoiding the complexities of standard therapies that require longer, more frequent dosing, Urania Rappo, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Dalbavancin already is approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and its long terminal half-life of 14 days and high bone penetration made it a natural candidate for evaluation in the treatment of osteomyelitis, said Dr. Rappo, director of clinical development (anti-infectives) at Allergan, which markets the drug and sponsored the study.

Michele G. Sullivan/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

On Twitter @alz_gal

VIENNA – Two infusions of the long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic dalbavancin showed a favorable clinical benefit for treatment of adult osteomyelitis in a phase II study.

Dalbavancin (Dalvance) showed positive results while avoiding the complexities of standard therapies that require longer, more frequent dosing, Urania Rappo, MD, said at the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases annual congress.

Dalbavancin already is approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and its long terminal half-life of 14 days and high bone penetration made it a natural candidate for evaluation in the treatment of osteomyelitis, said Dr. Rappo, director of clinical development (anti-infectives) at Allergan, which markets the drug and sponsored the study.

Michele G. Sullivan/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

On Twitter @alz_gal