Can Exercise Boost Cognitive Performance in Patients With MS?

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:41
Treadmill walking may be more effective than stationary cycling at improving cognition.

NEW ORLEANS—A single bout of treadmill walking might affect cognitive processing to a greater degree than stationary cycling, particularly among those with multiple sclerosis (MS) who demonstrate low aerobic fitness, according to a report presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Consortium of MS Centers. "This [finding] highlights the importance of targeting those with low aerobic fitness in treadmill walking exercise training interventions for improving cognition in persons with MS, as improving aerobic fitness may be beneficial for reducing MS-related cognitive-motor interference," said Brian M. Sandroff, PhD, of the Kessler Foundation in West Orange, New Jersey, and colleagues.

Brian M. Sandroff, PhD

The mechanisms by which treadmill walking improves cognition in patients with MS are not well understood. Researchers have hypothesized that treadmill walking is essentially a complex cognitive task that requires more attentional resources than other modalities of aerobic exercise (eg, cycle ergometry), and that repeated exposure trains the person in cognitive-motor processing. If this hypothesis is true, then patients with MS should demonstrate worse cognitive performance during treadmill walking than during cycle ergometry, as more attentional resources would presumably be devoted to walking on a treadmill than to cycling on a stationary bicycle. Furthermore, it is unknown whether better aerobic fitness attenuates such cognitive-motor interference in patients with MS.  

Dr. Sandroff and colleagues conducted a pilot study to examine cognitive performance before and during acute bouts of treadmill walking, stationary cycling, and seated quiet rest in 12 fully ambulatory patients with MS with high or low aerobic fitness using a within-subjects, repeated-measures design.  

Participants underwent a baseline incremental exercise test to exhaustion for measurement of aerobic fitness (ie, VO2peak). Participants further completed three experimental conditions that consisted of 20 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity treadmill walking exercise, moderate- to vigorous-intensity cycle ergometer exercise, and seated quiet rest in a randomized, counterbalanced order. Participants underwent the three-second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) as a measure of cognitive performance prior to and during each condition.  

Overall, decreases in PASAT performance during treadmill walking were not larger than those during cycle ergometry, relative to quiet rest. However, decreases in PASAT performance were larger for those with lower aerobic fitness during treadmill walking than during cycle ergometry, compared with quiet rest.

Meeting/Event
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
13
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles
Treadmill walking may be more effective than stationary cycling at improving cognition.
Treadmill walking may be more effective than stationary cycling at improving cognition.

NEW ORLEANS—A single bout of treadmill walking might affect cognitive processing to a greater degree than stationary cycling, particularly among those with multiple sclerosis (MS) who demonstrate low aerobic fitness, according to a report presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Consortium of MS Centers. "This [finding] highlights the importance of targeting those with low aerobic fitness in treadmill walking exercise training interventions for improving cognition in persons with MS, as improving aerobic fitness may be beneficial for reducing MS-related cognitive-motor interference," said Brian M. Sandroff, PhD, of the Kessler Foundation in West Orange, New Jersey, and colleagues.

Brian M. Sandroff, PhD

The mechanisms by which treadmill walking improves cognition in patients with MS are not well understood. Researchers have hypothesized that treadmill walking is essentially a complex cognitive task that requires more attentional resources than other modalities of aerobic exercise (eg, cycle ergometry), and that repeated exposure trains the person in cognitive-motor processing. If this hypothesis is true, then patients with MS should demonstrate worse cognitive performance during treadmill walking than during cycle ergometry, as more attentional resources would presumably be devoted to walking on a treadmill than to cycling on a stationary bicycle. Furthermore, it is unknown whether better aerobic fitness attenuates such cognitive-motor interference in patients with MS.  

Dr. Sandroff and colleagues conducted a pilot study to examine cognitive performance before and during acute bouts of treadmill walking, stationary cycling, and seated quiet rest in 12 fully ambulatory patients with MS with high or low aerobic fitness using a within-subjects, repeated-measures design.  

Participants underwent a baseline incremental exercise test to exhaustion for measurement of aerobic fitness (ie, VO2peak). Participants further completed three experimental conditions that consisted of 20 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity treadmill walking exercise, moderate- to vigorous-intensity cycle ergometer exercise, and seated quiet rest in a randomized, counterbalanced order. Participants underwent the three-second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) as a measure of cognitive performance prior to and during each condition.  

Overall, decreases in PASAT performance during treadmill walking were not larger than those during cycle ergometry, relative to quiet rest. However, decreases in PASAT performance were larger for those with lower aerobic fitness during treadmill walking than during cycle ergometry, compared with quiet rest.

NEW ORLEANS—A single bout of treadmill walking might affect cognitive processing to a greater degree than stationary cycling, particularly among those with multiple sclerosis (MS) who demonstrate low aerobic fitness, according to a report presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Consortium of MS Centers. "This [finding] highlights the importance of targeting those with low aerobic fitness in treadmill walking exercise training interventions for improving cognition in persons with MS, as improving aerobic fitness may be beneficial for reducing MS-related cognitive-motor interference," said Brian M. Sandroff, PhD, of the Kessler Foundation in West Orange, New Jersey, and colleagues.

Brian M. Sandroff, PhD

The mechanisms by which treadmill walking improves cognition in patients with MS are not well understood. Researchers have hypothesized that treadmill walking is essentially a complex cognitive task that requires more attentional resources than other modalities of aerobic exercise (eg, cycle ergometry), and that repeated exposure trains the person in cognitive-motor processing. If this hypothesis is true, then patients with MS should demonstrate worse cognitive performance during treadmill walking than during cycle ergometry, as more attentional resources would presumably be devoted to walking on a treadmill than to cycling on a stationary bicycle. Furthermore, it is unknown whether better aerobic fitness attenuates such cognitive-motor interference in patients with MS.  

Dr. Sandroff and colleagues conducted a pilot study to examine cognitive performance before and during acute bouts of treadmill walking, stationary cycling, and seated quiet rest in 12 fully ambulatory patients with MS with high or low aerobic fitness using a within-subjects, repeated-measures design.  

Participants underwent a baseline incremental exercise test to exhaustion for measurement of aerobic fitness (ie, VO2peak). Participants further completed three experimental conditions that consisted of 20 minutes of moderate- to vigorous-intensity treadmill walking exercise, moderate- to vigorous-intensity cycle ergometer exercise, and seated quiet rest in a randomized, counterbalanced order. Participants underwent the three-second Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) as a measure of cognitive performance prior to and during each condition.  

Overall, decreases in PASAT performance during treadmill walking were not larger than those during cycle ergometry, relative to quiet rest. However, decreases in PASAT performance were larger for those with lower aerobic fitness during treadmill walking than during cycle ergometry, compared with quiet rest.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Page Number
13
Page Number
13
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Patch is early indicator of temperature rise after HSCT

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 10:05

 

A fever-monitoring patch was well tolerated in hospitalized patients undergoing stem cell transplant or intensive chemotherapy for leukemia, and alerted physicians to the presence of a fever much earlier than did standard temperature-taking procedures, according to findings from a study abstract that was published in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

A fever-monitoring patch was well tolerated in hospitalized patients undergoing stem cell transplant or intensive chemotherapy for leukemia, and alerted physicians to the presence of a fever much earlier than did standard temperature-taking procedures, according to findings from a study abstract that was published in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

 

A fever-monitoring patch was well tolerated in hospitalized patients undergoing stem cell transplant or intensive chemotherapy for leukemia, and alerted physicians to the presence of a fever much earlier than did standard temperature-taking procedures, according to findings from a study abstract that was published in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM ASCO 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The device has the potential to detect infections as well as sepsis.

Major finding: The device detected fevers a median of 140 minutes sooner than did standard hospital testing.

Data source: Prospective study of 10 patients.

Disclosures: Mr. Gannon is an employee of Blue Spark Technologies, which sponsored the study.

Researchers Compare Three Escalation Therapies for MS

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:41
The discontinuation rate is higher for dimethyl fumarate than for fingolimod or natalizumab.

Brandi Vollmer, MPH
BOSTON—Fingolimod and natalizumab are associated with similar rates of discontinuation, but the reasons for discontinuation differ significantly, according to an analysis presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Compared with patients receiving natalizumab, patients treated with dimethyl fumarate are about twice as likely to discontinue therapy. Of the three disease-modifying drugs, natalizumab has superior efficacy, according to Brandi Vollmer, MPH, Professional Research Assistant at the University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora.

A Retrospective Chart Review

Ms. Vollmer and colleagues conducted a retrospective study to compare the discontinuation rates and efficacy of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate to those of natalizumab. In a retrospective chart review, they identified patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who presented to the Rocky Mountain MS Center in Aurora, Colorado. Eligible participants initiated drug therapy between January 2010 and October 2013. Patients who initiated natalizumab had to be negative for the John Cunningham virus (JCV) at baseline. Ms. Vollmer and colleagues retrospectively collected clinician-recorded data.

The study’s primary outcome was discontinuation at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included reasons for discontinuation, relapse activity, MRI activity, and a composite disease activity measure that comprised clinical relapse, contrast enhancement, and new T2 lesions on follow-up MRI. Ms. Vollmer and colleagues identified 1,302 patients who initiated insurance paperwork for natalizumab. To reduce the size of this sample, they randomly selected 800 patients, of whom 270 met the inclusion criteria. In all, 440 participants initiated paperwork for fingolimod, of whom 271 met the inclusion criteria. For dimethyl fumarate, the researchers found 592 participants who initiated the paperwork, and 342 met the inclusion criteria.

Patients receiving natalizumab were significantly younger (mean age, 39.8) than patients receiving fingolimod (42.5) or dimethyl fumarate (45.8). Furthermore, patients treated with natalizumab were more likely to be female (77.8%) than patients treated with fingolimod (72.0%) or dimethyl fumarate (69.6%). Patients receiving natalizumab also were more likely to have contrast enhancement on baseline MRI (31.2%) than were participants receiving fingolimod (24.6%) or dimethyl fumarate (14.6%). Mean disease duration was approximately 12 years for all groups.

Discontinuation and Disease Activity

The rate of discontinuation was similar for natalizumab (33.3%) and fingolimod (34.3%), but the researchers observed a significant difference between natalizumab and dimethyl fumarate (47.1%). Disease activity and adverse events were the most common reasons for discontinuation of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate, and JCV positivity was the most common reason for discontinuation of natalizumab. Of the seven participants who discontinued natalizumab because of disease activity, five had neutralizing antibodies. Of the 20 patients who discontinued natalizumab because of adverse events, nine had rashes during infusion, eight of whom tested positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Ms. Vollmer and colleagues found no significant difference between natalizumab and fingolimod in the rate of patients with a clinical relapse (5.6% and 8.9%, respectively), but they observed a significant difference between dimethyl fumarate (12.9%) and natalizumab for this outcome. Contrast enhancement was less common among patients receiving natalizumab (6.6%), compared with fingolimod (13.1%), but there was no significant difference between natalizumab and dimethyl fumarate (10.0%).

The rate of new T2 lesions was lower with natalizumab (21.4%), compared with fingolimod (35.0%) and dimethyl fumarate (31.5%). Similarly, the composite disease activity measure was less common with natalizumab (20.7%), compared with fingolimod (34.7%) and dimethyl fumarate (33.6%). Data adjustments indicated that discontinuation was equally likely among patients receiving fingolimod and those receiving natalizumab. Patients receiving dimethyl fumarate, however, were approximately twice as likely to discontinue treatment, compared with patients receiving natalizumab.

Furthermore, patients receiving fingolimod were approximately twice as likely to discontinue treatment because of adverse events, compared with patients receiving natalizumab. Patients treated with dimethyl fumarate were approximately four times as likely to discontinue because of adverse events, compared with patients treated with natalizumab. In addition, patients were approximately twice as likely to have disease activity on fingolimod or dimethyl fumarate, compared with natalizumab.

Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Barbin L, Rousseau C, Jousset N, et al. Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study. Neurology. 2016;86(8):771-778.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
10-12
Sections
The discontinuation rate is higher for dimethyl fumarate than for fingolimod or natalizumab.
The discontinuation rate is higher for dimethyl fumarate than for fingolimod or natalizumab.

Brandi Vollmer, MPH
BOSTON—Fingolimod and natalizumab are associated with similar rates of discontinuation, but the reasons for discontinuation differ significantly, according to an analysis presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Compared with patients receiving natalizumab, patients treated with dimethyl fumarate are about twice as likely to discontinue therapy. Of the three disease-modifying drugs, natalizumab has superior efficacy, according to Brandi Vollmer, MPH, Professional Research Assistant at the University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora.

A Retrospective Chart Review

Ms. Vollmer and colleagues conducted a retrospective study to compare the discontinuation rates and efficacy of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate to those of natalizumab. In a retrospective chart review, they identified patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who presented to the Rocky Mountain MS Center in Aurora, Colorado. Eligible participants initiated drug therapy between January 2010 and October 2013. Patients who initiated natalizumab had to be negative for the John Cunningham virus (JCV) at baseline. Ms. Vollmer and colleagues retrospectively collected clinician-recorded data.

The study’s primary outcome was discontinuation at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included reasons for discontinuation, relapse activity, MRI activity, and a composite disease activity measure that comprised clinical relapse, contrast enhancement, and new T2 lesions on follow-up MRI. Ms. Vollmer and colleagues identified 1,302 patients who initiated insurance paperwork for natalizumab. To reduce the size of this sample, they randomly selected 800 patients, of whom 270 met the inclusion criteria. In all, 440 participants initiated paperwork for fingolimod, of whom 271 met the inclusion criteria. For dimethyl fumarate, the researchers found 592 participants who initiated the paperwork, and 342 met the inclusion criteria.

Patients receiving natalizumab were significantly younger (mean age, 39.8) than patients receiving fingolimod (42.5) or dimethyl fumarate (45.8). Furthermore, patients treated with natalizumab were more likely to be female (77.8%) than patients treated with fingolimod (72.0%) or dimethyl fumarate (69.6%). Patients receiving natalizumab also were more likely to have contrast enhancement on baseline MRI (31.2%) than were participants receiving fingolimod (24.6%) or dimethyl fumarate (14.6%). Mean disease duration was approximately 12 years for all groups.

Discontinuation and Disease Activity

The rate of discontinuation was similar for natalizumab (33.3%) and fingolimod (34.3%), but the researchers observed a significant difference between natalizumab and dimethyl fumarate (47.1%). Disease activity and adverse events were the most common reasons for discontinuation of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate, and JCV positivity was the most common reason for discontinuation of natalizumab. Of the seven participants who discontinued natalizumab because of disease activity, five had neutralizing antibodies. Of the 20 patients who discontinued natalizumab because of adverse events, nine had rashes during infusion, eight of whom tested positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Ms. Vollmer and colleagues found no significant difference between natalizumab and fingolimod in the rate of patients with a clinical relapse (5.6% and 8.9%, respectively), but they observed a significant difference between dimethyl fumarate (12.9%) and natalizumab for this outcome. Contrast enhancement was less common among patients receiving natalizumab (6.6%), compared with fingolimod (13.1%), but there was no significant difference between natalizumab and dimethyl fumarate (10.0%).

The rate of new T2 lesions was lower with natalizumab (21.4%), compared with fingolimod (35.0%) and dimethyl fumarate (31.5%). Similarly, the composite disease activity measure was less common with natalizumab (20.7%), compared with fingolimod (34.7%) and dimethyl fumarate (33.6%). Data adjustments indicated that discontinuation was equally likely among patients receiving fingolimod and those receiving natalizumab. Patients receiving dimethyl fumarate, however, were approximately twice as likely to discontinue treatment, compared with patients receiving natalizumab.

Furthermore, patients receiving fingolimod were approximately twice as likely to discontinue treatment because of adverse events, compared with patients receiving natalizumab. Patients treated with dimethyl fumarate were approximately four times as likely to discontinue because of adverse events, compared with patients treated with natalizumab. In addition, patients were approximately twice as likely to have disease activity on fingolimod or dimethyl fumarate, compared with natalizumab.

Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Barbin L, Rousseau C, Jousset N, et al. Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study. Neurology. 2016;86(8):771-778.

Brandi Vollmer, MPH
BOSTON—Fingolimod and natalizumab are associated with similar rates of discontinuation, but the reasons for discontinuation differ significantly, according to an analysis presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Compared with patients receiving natalizumab, patients treated with dimethyl fumarate are about twice as likely to discontinue therapy. Of the three disease-modifying drugs, natalizumab has superior efficacy, according to Brandi Vollmer, MPH, Professional Research Assistant at the University of Colorado-Anschutz Medical Campus in Aurora.

A Retrospective Chart Review

Ms. Vollmer and colleagues conducted a retrospective study to compare the discontinuation rates and efficacy of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate to those of natalizumab. In a retrospective chart review, they identified patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who presented to the Rocky Mountain MS Center in Aurora, Colorado. Eligible participants initiated drug therapy between January 2010 and October 2013. Patients who initiated natalizumab had to be negative for the John Cunningham virus (JCV) at baseline. Ms. Vollmer and colleagues retrospectively collected clinician-recorded data.

The study’s primary outcome was discontinuation at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included reasons for discontinuation, relapse activity, MRI activity, and a composite disease activity measure that comprised clinical relapse, contrast enhancement, and new T2 lesions on follow-up MRI. Ms. Vollmer and colleagues identified 1,302 patients who initiated insurance paperwork for natalizumab. To reduce the size of this sample, they randomly selected 800 patients, of whom 270 met the inclusion criteria. In all, 440 participants initiated paperwork for fingolimod, of whom 271 met the inclusion criteria. For dimethyl fumarate, the researchers found 592 participants who initiated the paperwork, and 342 met the inclusion criteria.

Patients receiving natalizumab were significantly younger (mean age, 39.8) than patients receiving fingolimod (42.5) or dimethyl fumarate (45.8). Furthermore, patients treated with natalizumab were more likely to be female (77.8%) than patients treated with fingolimod (72.0%) or dimethyl fumarate (69.6%). Patients receiving natalizumab also were more likely to have contrast enhancement on baseline MRI (31.2%) than were participants receiving fingolimod (24.6%) or dimethyl fumarate (14.6%). Mean disease duration was approximately 12 years for all groups.

Discontinuation and Disease Activity

The rate of discontinuation was similar for natalizumab (33.3%) and fingolimod (34.3%), but the researchers observed a significant difference between natalizumab and dimethyl fumarate (47.1%). Disease activity and adverse events were the most common reasons for discontinuation of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate, and JCV positivity was the most common reason for discontinuation of natalizumab. Of the seven participants who discontinued natalizumab because of disease activity, five had neutralizing antibodies. Of the 20 patients who discontinued natalizumab because of adverse events, nine had rashes during infusion, eight of whom tested positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Ms. Vollmer and colleagues found no significant difference between natalizumab and fingolimod in the rate of patients with a clinical relapse (5.6% and 8.9%, respectively), but they observed a significant difference between dimethyl fumarate (12.9%) and natalizumab for this outcome. Contrast enhancement was less common among patients receiving natalizumab (6.6%), compared with fingolimod (13.1%), but there was no significant difference between natalizumab and dimethyl fumarate (10.0%).

The rate of new T2 lesions was lower with natalizumab (21.4%), compared with fingolimod (35.0%) and dimethyl fumarate (31.5%). Similarly, the composite disease activity measure was less common with natalizumab (20.7%), compared with fingolimod (34.7%) and dimethyl fumarate (33.6%). Data adjustments indicated that discontinuation was equally likely among patients receiving fingolimod and those receiving natalizumab. Patients receiving dimethyl fumarate, however, were approximately twice as likely to discontinue treatment, compared with patients receiving natalizumab.

Furthermore, patients receiving fingolimod were approximately twice as likely to discontinue treatment because of adverse events, compared with patients receiving natalizumab. Patients treated with dimethyl fumarate were approximately four times as likely to discontinue because of adverse events, compared with patients treated with natalizumab. In addition, patients were approximately twice as likely to have disease activity on fingolimod or dimethyl fumarate, compared with natalizumab.

Erik Greb

Suggested Reading

Barbin L, Rousseau C, Jousset N, et al. Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: A French multicenter observational study. Neurology. 2016;86(8):771-778.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Page Number
10-12
Page Number
10-12
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Noninvasive Eye Tracking May Help to Assess the Physiologic Impact of Elevated Intracranial Pressure

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:53
Increasingly elevated ICP was associated with increasingly abnormal eye tracking while patients watched a short film.

Eye tracking is a noninvasive technique that may help to assess two key physiologic signs of concussion, intracranial pressure (ICP) and ocular motility dysfunction, according to a study published online ahead of print June 2 in the Journal of Neurosurgery. This technique does not require a trained examiner, pupil dilation, imaging studies, or an invasive procedure such as lumbar or ventricular puncture, the authors noted.

“With these data, we are presenting a new application for eye-tracking technology, as well as a new mechanism for assessment of elevated ICP that is noninvasive, automatable, and could potentially be performed and analyzed remotely,” said Uzma Samadani, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and colleagues.

Uzma Samadani, MD, PhD

The boundaries of normal and elevated intracranial pressure vary between patients, said the authors. People with elevated intracranial pressure can develop abnormalities in global cerebral functioning. Elevated ICP can also affect the function of cranial nerves, which may contribute to ocular dysmotility. Dr. Samadani and colleagues assessed the impact of elevated ICP on eye-tracking sessions performed while patients watched a short film clip.

Eligible participants ranged in age from 18 to 70, were admitted to the Bellevue Hospital neurosurgical intensive care unit in New York City with vision correctable to within 20/500 bilaterally, and had denied a history of ocular dysmotility. In addition, these patients were conscious and able to communicate and to provide an ophthalmologic, medical, and neurologic history, as well as medications, drugs, and alcohol consumed within 24 hours prior to eye tracking.

Awake patients who required placement of an ICP monitor for clinical purposes underwent eye tracking while watching a 220-second continuously playing video. The investigators recorded pupil position at 500 Hz and calculated metrics associated with each eye individually and both eyes together. In addition, the researchers performed linear regression with generalized estimating equations to test the association of eye-tracking metrics with changes in ICP.

The investigators performed eye tracking at ICP levels ranging from –3 mm Hg to 30 mm Hg in 23 patients (12 women, mean age 46.8) on 55 occasions. Eye-tracking measures correlating with cranial nerve function decreased linearly with increasing ICP.

Researchers also found that measures for cranial nerve VI were the most prominently affected. The area under the curve for eye-tracking metrics to discriminate between an ICP <12 mm Hg and one of 12 mm Hg was 0.798. To discriminate between an ICP <15 mm Hg and one of 15 mm Hg, the area under the curve was 0.833. Finally, to discriminate between an ICP <20 mm Hg and 20 mm Hg, the area under the curve was 0.889.

Overall, increasingly elevated ICP was associated with increasingly abnormal eye tracking detected while patients were watching the short film. The “technology has clinical applications for assessment of shunt malfunction, pseudotumor cerebri, concussion, and prevention of second-impact syndrome,” said Dr. Samadani and colleagues.

The major limitation of this study was the lack of continuous data in patients with higher ICP recordings, the authors said. Few patients with elevated ICP could open their eyes long enough to undergo eye tracking.

Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Kolecki R, Dammavalam V, Zahid A, et al. Elevated intracranial pressure and reversible eye-tracking changes detected while viewing a film clip. J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun 2 [Epub ahead of print].

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
26-27
Sections
Increasingly elevated ICP was associated with increasingly abnormal eye tracking while patients watched a short film.
Increasingly elevated ICP was associated with increasingly abnormal eye tracking while patients watched a short film.

Eye tracking is a noninvasive technique that may help to assess two key physiologic signs of concussion, intracranial pressure (ICP) and ocular motility dysfunction, according to a study published online ahead of print June 2 in the Journal of Neurosurgery. This technique does not require a trained examiner, pupil dilation, imaging studies, or an invasive procedure such as lumbar or ventricular puncture, the authors noted.

“With these data, we are presenting a new application for eye-tracking technology, as well as a new mechanism for assessment of elevated ICP that is noninvasive, automatable, and could potentially be performed and analyzed remotely,” said Uzma Samadani, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and colleagues.

Uzma Samadani, MD, PhD

The boundaries of normal and elevated intracranial pressure vary between patients, said the authors. People with elevated intracranial pressure can develop abnormalities in global cerebral functioning. Elevated ICP can also affect the function of cranial nerves, which may contribute to ocular dysmotility. Dr. Samadani and colleagues assessed the impact of elevated ICP on eye-tracking sessions performed while patients watched a short film clip.

Eligible participants ranged in age from 18 to 70, were admitted to the Bellevue Hospital neurosurgical intensive care unit in New York City with vision correctable to within 20/500 bilaterally, and had denied a history of ocular dysmotility. In addition, these patients were conscious and able to communicate and to provide an ophthalmologic, medical, and neurologic history, as well as medications, drugs, and alcohol consumed within 24 hours prior to eye tracking.

Awake patients who required placement of an ICP monitor for clinical purposes underwent eye tracking while watching a 220-second continuously playing video. The investigators recorded pupil position at 500 Hz and calculated metrics associated with each eye individually and both eyes together. In addition, the researchers performed linear regression with generalized estimating equations to test the association of eye-tracking metrics with changes in ICP.

The investigators performed eye tracking at ICP levels ranging from –3 mm Hg to 30 mm Hg in 23 patients (12 women, mean age 46.8) on 55 occasions. Eye-tracking measures correlating with cranial nerve function decreased linearly with increasing ICP.

Researchers also found that measures for cranial nerve VI were the most prominently affected. The area under the curve for eye-tracking metrics to discriminate between an ICP <12 mm Hg and one of 12 mm Hg was 0.798. To discriminate between an ICP <15 mm Hg and one of 15 mm Hg, the area under the curve was 0.833. Finally, to discriminate between an ICP <20 mm Hg and 20 mm Hg, the area under the curve was 0.889.

Overall, increasingly elevated ICP was associated with increasingly abnormal eye tracking detected while patients were watching the short film. The “technology has clinical applications for assessment of shunt malfunction, pseudotumor cerebri, concussion, and prevention of second-impact syndrome,” said Dr. Samadani and colleagues.

The major limitation of this study was the lack of continuous data in patients with higher ICP recordings, the authors said. Few patients with elevated ICP could open their eyes long enough to undergo eye tracking.

Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Kolecki R, Dammavalam V, Zahid A, et al. Elevated intracranial pressure and reversible eye-tracking changes detected while viewing a film clip. J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun 2 [Epub ahead of print].

Eye tracking is a noninvasive technique that may help to assess two key physiologic signs of concussion, intracranial pressure (ICP) and ocular motility dysfunction, according to a study published online ahead of print June 2 in the Journal of Neurosurgery. This technique does not require a trained examiner, pupil dilation, imaging studies, or an invasive procedure such as lumbar or ventricular puncture, the authors noted.

“With these data, we are presenting a new application for eye-tracking technology, as well as a new mechanism for assessment of elevated ICP that is noninvasive, automatable, and could potentially be performed and analyzed remotely,” said Uzma Samadani, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and colleagues.

Uzma Samadani, MD, PhD

The boundaries of normal and elevated intracranial pressure vary between patients, said the authors. People with elevated intracranial pressure can develop abnormalities in global cerebral functioning. Elevated ICP can also affect the function of cranial nerves, which may contribute to ocular dysmotility. Dr. Samadani and colleagues assessed the impact of elevated ICP on eye-tracking sessions performed while patients watched a short film clip.

Eligible participants ranged in age from 18 to 70, were admitted to the Bellevue Hospital neurosurgical intensive care unit in New York City with vision correctable to within 20/500 bilaterally, and had denied a history of ocular dysmotility. In addition, these patients were conscious and able to communicate and to provide an ophthalmologic, medical, and neurologic history, as well as medications, drugs, and alcohol consumed within 24 hours prior to eye tracking.

Awake patients who required placement of an ICP monitor for clinical purposes underwent eye tracking while watching a 220-second continuously playing video. The investigators recorded pupil position at 500 Hz and calculated metrics associated with each eye individually and both eyes together. In addition, the researchers performed linear regression with generalized estimating equations to test the association of eye-tracking metrics with changes in ICP.

The investigators performed eye tracking at ICP levels ranging from –3 mm Hg to 30 mm Hg in 23 patients (12 women, mean age 46.8) on 55 occasions. Eye-tracking measures correlating with cranial nerve function decreased linearly with increasing ICP.

Researchers also found that measures for cranial nerve VI were the most prominently affected. The area under the curve for eye-tracking metrics to discriminate between an ICP <12 mm Hg and one of 12 mm Hg was 0.798. To discriminate between an ICP <15 mm Hg and one of 15 mm Hg, the area under the curve was 0.833. Finally, to discriminate between an ICP <20 mm Hg and 20 mm Hg, the area under the curve was 0.889.

Overall, increasingly elevated ICP was associated with increasingly abnormal eye tracking detected while patients were watching the short film. The “technology has clinical applications for assessment of shunt malfunction, pseudotumor cerebri, concussion, and prevention of second-impact syndrome,” said Dr. Samadani and colleagues.

The major limitation of this study was the lack of continuous data in patients with higher ICP recordings, the authors said. Few patients with elevated ICP could open their eyes long enough to undergo eye tracking.

Erica Tricarico

Suggested Reading

Kolecki R, Dammavalam V, Zahid A, et al. Elevated intracranial pressure and reversible eye-tracking changes detected while viewing a film clip. J Neurosurg. 2017 Jun 2 [Epub ahead of print].

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 25(7)
Page Number
26-27
Page Number
26-27
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Chemo-free induction in MCL keeps getting better

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 01/17/2023 - 11:25

 

– It’s not the end of chemotherapy for young patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but it’s a start.

For these patients, induction with a combination of ibrutinib and rituximab, followed by shorter cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, was associated in an early study with an objective response rate of 100%, including 90% complete responses (CR), reported Michael Wang, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“This is the first time for a chemo-free therapy – ibrutinib/rituximab – to achieve an overall response rate of 100%. This has an unprecedented efficacy in the frontline in young patients with mantle-cell lymphoma,” he said at the 14th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

In patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, the combination of ibrutinib and rituximab has been associated with durable responses in 88% of patients. The success of the combination suggests that fit patients younger than age 65 years with newly diagnosed MCL might benefit from a chemotherapy-free induction regimen with ibrutinib and rituximab, followed by consolidation with a short but intense course of chemoimmunotherapy, Dr. Wang said.

He presented updated results from the phase II Window I study, first results of which were reported at the 2016 meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Frontline therapy is the most important therapy for mantle cell lymphoma, because mantle cell lymphoma cells are most vulnerable to frontline attack. If the frontline therapy is good enough, it could kill all the mantle cell lymphoma cells, therefore leaving no chance for secondary resistance, and thereby (resulting in) long-term survival. And it is really my belief that if we ideally optimized the frontline therapy, that would be a shortcut to a cure,” he said.

To test this idea, Dr. Wang and MD Anderson colleagues initiated a phase II trial at their institution with 50 patients age 65 years or under with newly diagnosed, CD20-positive and Cyclin D1-positive MCL.

A total of 50 patients age 65 years or younger (median age 54) with newly diagnosed, untreated MCL underwent induction with continuous daily ibrutinib 560 mg, plus rituximab 375 mg/m2 administered weekly for 4 weeks during cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 3-12. Consolidation consisted of rituximab plus hyper-CVAD (hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), alternating every 28 days with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate–cytarabine.

Patients who had complete responses to induction received four cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, while those who experienced disease progression and those who had partial responses received chemoimmunotherapy for two cycles beyond the point of complete remissions.

At the time of the presentation, all 50 patients were evaluable for the induction phase (part 2), and 47 were evaluable for both induction and consolidation (part 2) .Of the evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) to chemotherapy-free induction therapy alone (Part 1 ) was 100% (50), with CR in 90% of patients and partial responses (PR) in 10%. Of the 47 patients evaluable for part 2 (chemoimmunotherapy), all had CRs, for an ORR of 100%.

Dr. Wang noted that one patient had a dramatic radiographic reduction in spleen size following just two cycles of chemotherapy-free induction, and two other patients had similar reductions after four and six cycles, respectively.

After a median follow-up of 15.9 months, neither the median duration of response, progression-free survival, nor overall survival have been reached. There have been no deaths and only one case of disease progression after one year of therapy.

The patients generally tolerated the regimen very well, Dr. Wang said. There were no cases of lymphocytosis, bleeding, or atrial fibrillation after 332 combined cycles.

Nonhematological adverse events were primarily grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 fatigue was reported in approximately 10% of patients. There were no grade 4 adverse events.

“This study may provide a window of opportunity to reduce the frontline therapies and reduce the long-term toxicities such as secondary malignancies.” Dr. Wang said.

He acknowledged that four cycles of intensive chemotherapy is still toxic and that further efforts to reduce these toxicities are needed. The investigators are currently planning the Window II study, in which a fraction of patients will be treated with no chemotherapy at all, he said.­­­­

The study was supported by Pharmacyclics and Janssen. Dr. Wang disclosed receiving research grants and honoraria and serving as a consultant for the companies.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– It’s not the end of chemotherapy for young patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but it’s a start.

For these patients, induction with a combination of ibrutinib and rituximab, followed by shorter cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, was associated in an early study with an objective response rate of 100%, including 90% complete responses (CR), reported Michael Wang, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“This is the first time for a chemo-free therapy – ibrutinib/rituximab – to achieve an overall response rate of 100%. This has an unprecedented efficacy in the frontline in young patients with mantle-cell lymphoma,” he said at the 14th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

In patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, the combination of ibrutinib and rituximab has been associated with durable responses in 88% of patients. The success of the combination suggests that fit patients younger than age 65 years with newly diagnosed MCL might benefit from a chemotherapy-free induction regimen with ibrutinib and rituximab, followed by consolidation with a short but intense course of chemoimmunotherapy, Dr. Wang said.

He presented updated results from the phase II Window I study, first results of which were reported at the 2016 meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Frontline therapy is the most important therapy for mantle cell lymphoma, because mantle cell lymphoma cells are most vulnerable to frontline attack. If the frontline therapy is good enough, it could kill all the mantle cell lymphoma cells, therefore leaving no chance for secondary resistance, and thereby (resulting in) long-term survival. And it is really my belief that if we ideally optimized the frontline therapy, that would be a shortcut to a cure,” he said.

To test this idea, Dr. Wang and MD Anderson colleagues initiated a phase II trial at their institution with 50 patients age 65 years or under with newly diagnosed, CD20-positive and Cyclin D1-positive MCL.

A total of 50 patients age 65 years or younger (median age 54) with newly diagnosed, untreated MCL underwent induction with continuous daily ibrutinib 560 mg, plus rituximab 375 mg/m2 administered weekly for 4 weeks during cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 3-12. Consolidation consisted of rituximab plus hyper-CVAD (hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), alternating every 28 days with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate–cytarabine.

Patients who had complete responses to induction received four cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, while those who experienced disease progression and those who had partial responses received chemoimmunotherapy for two cycles beyond the point of complete remissions.

At the time of the presentation, all 50 patients were evaluable for the induction phase (part 2), and 47 were evaluable for both induction and consolidation (part 2) .Of the evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) to chemotherapy-free induction therapy alone (Part 1 ) was 100% (50), with CR in 90% of patients and partial responses (PR) in 10%. Of the 47 patients evaluable for part 2 (chemoimmunotherapy), all had CRs, for an ORR of 100%.

Dr. Wang noted that one patient had a dramatic radiographic reduction in spleen size following just two cycles of chemotherapy-free induction, and two other patients had similar reductions after four and six cycles, respectively.

After a median follow-up of 15.9 months, neither the median duration of response, progression-free survival, nor overall survival have been reached. There have been no deaths and only one case of disease progression after one year of therapy.

The patients generally tolerated the regimen very well, Dr. Wang said. There were no cases of lymphocytosis, bleeding, or atrial fibrillation after 332 combined cycles.

Nonhematological adverse events were primarily grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 fatigue was reported in approximately 10% of patients. There were no grade 4 adverse events.

“This study may provide a window of opportunity to reduce the frontline therapies and reduce the long-term toxicities such as secondary malignancies.” Dr. Wang said.

He acknowledged that four cycles of intensive chemotherapy is still toxic and that further efforts to reduce these toxicities are needed. The investigators are currently planning the Window II study, in which a fraction of patients will be treated with no chemotherapy at all, he said.­­­­

The study was supported by Pharmacyclics and Janssen. Dr. Wang disclosed receiving research grants and honoraria and serving as a consultant for the companies.

 

– It’s not the end of chemotherapy for young patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), but it’s a start.

For these patients, induction with a combination of ibrutinib and rituximab, followed by shorter cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, was associated in an early study with an objective response rate of 100%, including 90% complete responses (CR), reported Michael Wang, MD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

“This is the first time for a chemo-free therapy – ibrutinib/rituximab – to achieve an overall response rate of 100%. This has an unprecedented efficacy in the frontline in young patients with mantle-cell lymphoma,” he said at the 14th International Congress on Malignant Lymphoma.

In patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, the combination of ibrutinib and rituximab has been associated with durable responses in 88% of patients. The success of the combination suggests that fit patients younger than age 65 years with newly diagnosed MCL might benefit from a chemotherapy-free induction regimen with ibrutinib and rituximab, followed by consolidation with a short but intense course of chemoimmunotherapy, Dr. Wang said.

He presented updated results from the phase II Window I study, first results of which were reported at the 2016 meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Frontline therapy is the most important therapy for mantle cell lymphoma, because mantle cell lymphoma cells are most vulnerable to frontline attack. If the frontline therapy is good enough, it could kill all the mantle cell lymphoma cells, therefore leaving no chance for secondary resistance, and thereby (resulting in) long-term survival. And it is really my belief that if we ideally optimized the frontline therapy, that would be a shortcut to a cure,” he said.

To test this idea, Dr. Wang and MD Anderson colleagues initiated a phase II trial at their institution with 50 patients age 65 years or under with newly diagnosed, CD20-positive and Cyclin D1-positive MCL.

A total of 50 patients age 65 years or younger (median age 54) with newly diagnosed, untreated MCL underwent induction with continuous daily ibrutinib 560 mg, plus rituximab 375 mg/m2 administered weekly for 4 weeks during cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 3-12. Consolidation consisted of rituximab plus hyper-CVAD (hyper-fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone), alternating every 28 days with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate–cytarabine.

Patients who had complete responses to induction received four cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, while those who experienced disease progression and those who had partial responses received chemoimmunotherapy for two cycles beyond the point of complete remissions.

At the time of the presentation, all 50 patients were evaluable for the induction phase (part 2), and 47 were evaluable for both induction and consolidation (part 2) .Of the evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) to chemotherapy-free induction therapy alone (Part 1 ) was 100% (50), with CR in 90% of patients and partial responses (PR) in 10%. Of the 47 patients evaluable for part 2 (chemoimmunotherapy), all had CRs, for an ORR of 100%.

Dr. Wang noted that one patient had a dramatic radiographic reduction in spleen size following just two cycles of chemotherapy-free induction, and two other patients had similar reductions after four and six cycles, respectively.

After a median follow-up of 15.9 months, neither the median duration of response, progression-free survival, nor overall survival have been reached. There have been no deaths and only one case of disease progression after one year of therapy.

The patients generally tolerated the regimen very well, Dr. Wang said. There were no cases of lymphocytosis, bleeding, or atrial fibrillation after 332 combined cycles.

Nonhematological adverse events were primarily grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 fatigue was reported in approximately 10% of patients. There were no grade 4 adverse events.

“This study may provide a window of opportunity to reduce the frontline therapies and reduce the long-term toxicities such as secondary malignancies.” Dr. Wang said.

He acknowledged that four cycles of intensive chemotherapy is still toxic and that further efforts to reduce these toxicities are needed. The investigators are currently planning the Window II study, in which a fraction of patients will be treated with no chemotherapy at all, he said.­­­­

The study was supported by Pharmacyclics and Janssen. Dr. Wang disclosed receiving research grants and honoraria and serving as a consultant for the companies.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT14-ICML

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A chemotherapy-free induction regimen with ibrutinib and rituximab was associated with high response rates in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Major finding: The overall response rate after induction was 100%, including 90% complete responses.

Data source: Update results from phase II investigator-initiated study in 50 patients aged 65 years and younger with MCL.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Pharmacyclics and Janssen. Dr. Wang disclosed receiving research grants and honoraria and serving as a consultant for the companies.

Antibody from AML survivor may prove therapeutic

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 10:05

 

– A therapeutic target and possibly a treatment for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome may lie in the immortalized B cells of a patient whose acute myeloid leukemia was cured after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

A B cell clone isolated from this patient makes a hypermutated immunoglobulin G1 antibody that binds leukemic blasts of all World Health Organization 2008 AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) types, based on cells obtained from 60 AML or MDS patients, but does not target healthy cells and lymphoid tissue, Mette D. Hazenberg, MD, PhD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Mary Jo M. Dales
Dr. Mette Hazenberg
The antibody, called AT1413, targets sialylated CD43, an antigen that is overexpressed in AML and MDS blasts. Unlike commercial CD43 antibodies, which target Jurkat lymphocytes and THP-1 cells, AT1413 only targets THP-1 cells. While AT1413 binds to endothelial cells and granulocytes, it does not kill these cells. It does, however, kill SH2 AML cells.

“CD43 is broadly expressed on AML and MDS and, therefore, is a highly interesting target for immunotherapy,” said Dr. Hazenberg of AIMM Therapeutics and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.

The growth of luciferase-labeled AML cells expressing CD43s was inhibited in highly immunodeficient NOD scid-gamma mice that were reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells injected with AT1413. Healthy human hematopoietic cells, which express low levels of the target, were not affected by the treatment.

Next steps include further in vivo preclinical studies, according to Dr. Hazenberg.

AIMM Therapeutics is a biotech company comprising a joint venture between Immpact and the Academic Medical Center (AMC) at the University of Amsterdam. The study was supported by an AMC PhD scholarship and the KWF Dutch Cancer Society.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– A therapeutic target and possibly a treatment for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome may lie in the immortalized B cells of a patient whose acute myeloid leukemia was cured after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

A B cell clone isolated from this patient makes a hypermutated immunoglobulin G1 antibody that binds leukemic blasts of all World Health Organization 2008 AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) types, based on cells obtained from 60 AML or MDS patients, but does not target healthy cells and lymphoid tissue, Mette D. Hazenberg, MD, PhD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Mary Jo M. Dales
Dr. Mette Hazenberg
The antibody, called AT1413, targets sialylated CD43, an antigen that is overexpressed in AML and MDS blasts. Unlike commercial CD43 antibodies, which target Jurkat lymphocytes and THP-1 cells, AT1413 only targets THP-1 cells. While AT1413 binds to endothelial cells and granulocytes, it does not kill these cells. It does, however, kill SH2 AML cells.

“CD43 is broadly expressed on AML and MDS and, therefore, is a highly interesting target for immunotherapy,” said Dr. Hazenberg of AIMM Therapeutics and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.

The growth of luciferase-labeled AML cells expressing CD43s was inhibited in highly immunodeficient NOD scid-gamma mice that were reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells injected with AT1413. Healthy human hematopoietic cells, which express low levels of the target, were not affected by the treatment.

Next steps include further in vivo preclinical studies, according to Dr. Hazenberg.

AIMM Therapeutics is a biotech company comprising a joint venture between Immpact and the Academic Medical Center (AMC) at the University of Amsterdam. The study was supported by an AMC PhD scholarship and the KWF Dutch Cancer Society.

 

– A therapeutic target and possibly a treatment for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome may lie in the immortalized B cells of a patient whose acute myeloid leukemia was cured after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

A B cell clone isolated from this patient makes a hypermutated immunoglobulin G1 antibody that binds leukemic blasts of all World Health Organization 2008 AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) types, based on cells obtained from 60 AML or MDS patients, but does not target healthy cells and lymphoid tissue, Mette D. Hazenberg, MD, PhD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Mary Jo M. Dales
Dr. Mette Hazenberg
The antibody, called AT1413, targets sialylated CD43, an antigen that is overexpressed in AML and MDS blasts. Unlike commercial CD43 antibodies, which target Jurkat lymphocytes and THP-1 cells, AT1413 only targets THP-1 cells. While AT1413 binds to endothelial cells and granulocytes, it does not kill these cells. It does, however, kill SH2 AML cells.

“CD43 is broadly expressed on AML and MDS and, therefore, is a highly interesting target for immunotherapy,” said Dr. Hazenberg of AIMM Therapeutics and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam.

The growth of luciferase-labeled AML cells expressing CD43s was inhibited in highly immunodeficient NOD scid-gamma mice that were reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells injected with AT1413. Healthy human hematopoietic cells, which express low levels of the target, were not affected by the treatment.

Next steps include further in vivo preclinical studies, according to Dr. Hazenberg.

AIMM Therapeutics is a biotech company comprising a joint venture between Immpact and the Academic Medical Center (AMC) at the University of Amsterdam. The study was supported by an AMC PhD scholarship and the KWF Dutch Cancer Society.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT ASCO 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: AT1413 targets sialylated CD43, an antigen that is overexpressed in AML and MDS blasts.

Major finding: The growth of luciferase-labeled SH2 cells was inhibited in highly immunodeficient NSG (NOD scid-gamma) mice that were reconstituted with human hematopoietic stem cells injected with AT1413.

Data source: Cellular studies and studies in severely immunodeficient mice.

Disclosures: Dr. Hazenberg is with AIMM Therapeutics and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam. AIMM Therapeutics is a biotech company comprising a joint venture between Immpact and the Academic Medical Center (AMC) at the University of Amsterdam. The study was supported by an AMC PhD scholarship and the KWF Dutch Cancer Society.

ACIP approves new influenza vaccine recommendations

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:51

 

FROM AN ACIP MEETING

New draft recommendations on influenza vaccines for children and pregnant women were unanimously passed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) after a lengthy debate over specifics regarding recommendations for pregnant women.

The proposed recommendation that sparked the debate would change the wording of the previous recommendation for pregnant women to receive a seasonal inactivated vaccine (IIV) to “any licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate, trivalent or quadrivalent IIV or RIV [recombinant influenza vaccine] may be used.”

Steve Mann/Thinkstock
Members of the committee were hesitant to introduce this new wording, concerned that the language was too strong for the uncertainty some of the committee felt about the safety of including a recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV), Flublok, among those recommended.

“I think there’s a subtle, but important difference here between making what would appear to be an affirmative statement that RIV is safe in pregnant women, versus just staying silent on it, and saying ‘we’re not saying you shouldn’t use it, but we don’t have enough data to affirmatively say it is safe,’ ” said Cindy Pellegrini, senior vice president of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the March of Dimes Foundation.

In response, members of the committee pointed out that the responsibility of determining safety lies with the Food and Drug Administration, which has already licensed the Flublok trivalent vaccine with expectations that the quadrivalent vaccine soon will follow.

While Lisa Grohskopf, MD, MPH, medical officer of the influenza division of the CDC, did acknowledge that there were more data on the safety of inactivated influenza vaccines, she asserted to the committee that “the general overall safety profile of Flublok in comparison to inactivated vaccines is reassuring.”

“For example, one concern that arises is reactogenicity and inflammation. [In terms of] overall reactogenicity in the studies where Flublok and inactivated vaccines have been compared, rates of the adverse and systemic reactions were similar,” Dr. Grohskopf said.

A motion was made to change the wording of the recommendation; however, the motion was not passed, and the eventual vote on the approval was conducted.

The ACIP also voted unanimously to change the safe age limit noted in influenza guidelines for use of Afluria (IIV3) from 9 years and older to 5 years and older. A footnote saying that the ACIP recommends Afluria for children 9 years and older will be removed.

This change, which mirrors the licensing Afluria has with the FDA, was based on research conducted by Seqirus that showed fever levels were the same for Afluria trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in children 5 to 9 years old, both of which were less than historical vaccine rates.

The approved recommendations will be sent to the director of the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Once reviewed and approved, the final recommendations will be published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The committee members had no relevant financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

FROM AN ACIP MEETING

New draft recommendations on influenza vaccines for children and pregnant women were unanimously passed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) after a lengthy debate over specifics regarding recommendations for pregnant women.

The proposed recommendation that sparked the debate would change the wording of the previous recommendation for pregnant women to receive a seasonal inactivated vaccine (IIV) to “any licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate, trivalent or quadrivalent IIV or RIV [recombinant influenza vaccine] may be used.”

Steve Mann/Thinkstock
Members of the committee were hesitant to introduce this new wording, concerned that the language was too strong for the uncertainty some of the committee felt about the safety of including a recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV), Flublok, among those recommended.

“I think there’s a subtle, but important difference here between making what would appear to be an affirmative statement that RIV is safe in pregnant women, versus just staying silent on it, and saying ‘we’re not saying you shouldn’t use it, but we don’t have enough data to affirmatively say it is safe,’ ” said Cindy Pellegrini, senior vice president of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the March of Dimes Foundation.

In response, members of the committee pointed out that the responsibility of determining safety lies with the Food and Drug Administration, which has already licensed the Flublok trivalent vaccine with expectations that the quadrivalent vaccine soon will follow.

While Lisa Grohskopf, MD, MPH, medical officer of the influenza division of the CDC, did acknowledge that there were more data on the safety of inactivated influenza vaccines, she asserted to the committee that “the general overall safety profile of Flublok in comparison to inactivated vaccines is reassuring.”

“For example, one concern that arises is reactogenicity and inflammation. [In terms of] overall reactogenicity in the studies where Flublok and inactivated vaccines have been compared, rates of the adverse and systemic reactions were similar,” Dr. Grohskopf said.

A motion was made to change the wording of the recommendation; however, the motion was not passed, and the eventual vote on the approval was conducted.

The ACIP also voted unanimously to change the safe age limit noted in influenza guidelines for use of Afluria (IIV3) from 9 years and older to 5 years and older. A footnote saying that the ACIP recommends Afluria for children 9 years and older will be removed.

This change, which mirrors the licensing Afluria has with the FDA, was based on research conducted by Seqirus that showed fever levels were the same for Afluria trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in children 5 to 9 years old, both of which were less than historical vaccine rates.

The approved recommendations will be sent to the director of the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Once reviewed and approved, the final recommendations will be published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The committee members had no relevant financial disclosures.

 

FROM AN ACIP MEETING

New draft recommendations on influenza vaccines for children and pregnant women were unanimously passed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) after a lengthy debate over specifics regarding recommendations for pregnant women.

The proposed recommendation that sparked the debate would change the wording of the previous recommendation for pregnant women to receive a seasonal inactivated vaccine (IIV) to “any licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate, trivalent or quadrivalent IIV or RIV [recombinant influenza vaccine] may be used.”

Steve Mann/Thinkstock
Members of the committee were hesitant to introduce this new wording, concerned that the language was too strong for the uncertainty some of the committee felt about the safety of including a recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV), Flublok, among those recommended.

“I think there’s a subtle, but important difference here between making what would appear to be an affirmative statement that RIV is safe in pregnant women, versus just staying silent on it, and saying ‘we’re not saying you shouldn’t use it, but we don’t have enough data to affirmatively say it is safe,’ ” said Cindy Pellegrini, senior vice president of Public Policy and Government Affairs at the March of Dimes Foundation.

In response, members of the committee pointed out that the responsibility of determining safety lies with the Food and Drug Administration, which has already licensed the Flublok trivalent vaccine with expectations that the quadrivalent vaccine soon will follow.

While Lisa Grohskopf, MD, MPH, medical officer of the influenza division of the CDC, did acknowledge that there were more data on the safety of inactivated influenza vaccines, she asserted to the committee that “the general overall safety profile of Flublok in comparison to inactivated vaccines is reassuring.”

“For example, one concern that arises is reactogenicity and inflammation. [In terms of] overall reactogenicity in the studies where Flublok and inactivated vaccines have been compared, rates of the adverse and systemic reactions were similar,” Dr. Grohskopf said.

A motion was made to change the wording of the recommendation; however, the motion was not passed, and the eventual vote on the approval was conducted.

The ACIP also voted unanimously to change the safe age limit noted in influenza guidelines for use of Afluria (IIV3) from 9 years and older to 5 years and older. A footnote saying that the ACIP recommends Afluria for children 9 years and older will be removed.

This change, which mirrors the licensing Afluria has with the FDA, was based on research conducted by Seqirus that showed fever levels were the same for Afluria trivalent and quadrivalent vaccines in children 5 to 9 years old, both of which were less than historical vaccine rates.

The approved recommendations will be sent to the director of the CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Once reviewed and approved, the final recommendations will be published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The committee members had no relevant financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Novel ibuprofen formulation cuts GI side effects in patients with knee pain flares

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 16:51

 

– A novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen given at 1,200 mg/day proved noninferior to high-dose standard ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day for management of episodic knee pain flares in a phase III randomized trial, and it accomplished this with significantly fewer gastrointestinal side effects, Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, MD, reported.

Episodic flares of knee pain are a disabling feature of knee osteoarthritis that can occur at all stages of the disease, including prior to clinical diagnosis. There is a need for a fast-acting analgesic designed for short-term use with minimal side effects to provide pain relief during these flares. This was the motivation for developing Flarin, a lipid formulation soft-gel capsule of ibuprofen that is effective at less-than-standard doses of the conventional NSAID, she explained at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis.

Dr. Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra
She presented results of a triple-arm randomized trial conducted in primary care offices in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The phase III study included 462 adults up to age 70 with a history of at least one flare of knee pain during the prior year, along with another such episode underway for less than 24 hours at the time of enrollment. The patients were assigned to the novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen in soft-gel capsules at 1,200 mg/day or to conventional ibuprofen in soft-gel capsules at either 1,200 or 2,400 mg/day.

The primary outcome was change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale after 5 days of treatment. The score dropped from a mean of 5.72 at baseline out of a possible maximum of 10 to 3.05 in the lipid ibuprofen group, from 5.6 to 3.26 in patients on standard ibuprofen at 1,200 mg/day, and from 5.61 to 2.82 in subjects on standard ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day. Those between-group differences were not statistically significant, reported Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra, professor of osteoarthritis and related disorders at Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam.

In contrast, the rate of gastrointestinal side effects was significantly different across the three treatment arms: 16.2% in the lipid ibuprofen group, 22.6% with conventional ibuprofen at 1,200 mg/day, and 28.3% with ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day, she said at the congress, which was sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The group on the investigational formulation of ibuprofen also showed a consistent trend for superior results on the WOMAC swelling, pain, stiffness, and function subscales after 5 days of treatment, although only the improvement in swelling achieved statistical significance, Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra continued.

Flarin is approved and marketed in the United Kingdom. Infirst Healthcare, the novel NSAID’s developer and the sponsor of the phase III randomized trial, is seeking to gain regulatory approval throughout Europe. The U.K. company also has an agreement with McNeil Consumer Pharmaceuticals to market its products in the United States, once approved.

Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra reported having received a research grant from Infirst.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– A novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen given at 1,200 mg/day proved noninferior to high-dose standard ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day for management of episodic knee pain flares in a phase III randomized trial, and it accomplished this with significantly fewer gastrointestinal side effects, Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, MD, reported.

Episodic flares of knee pain are a disabling feature of knee osteoarthritis that can occur at all stages of the disease, including prior to clinical diagnosis. There is a need for a fast-acting analgesic designed for short-term use with minimal side effects to provide pain relief during these flares. This was the motivation for developing Flarin, a lipid formulation soft-gel capsule of ibuprofen that is effective at less-than-standard doses of the conventional NSAID, she explained at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis.

Dr. Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra
She presented results of a triple-arm randomized trial conducted in primary care offices in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The phase III study included 462 adults up to age 70 with a history of at least one flare of knee pain during the prior year, along with another such episode underway for less than 24 hours at the time of enrollment. The patients were assigned to the novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen in soft-gel capsules at 1,200 mg/day or to conventional ibuprofen in soft-gel capsules at either 1,200 or 2,400 mg/day.

The primary outcome was change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale after 5 days of treatment. The score dropped from a mean of 5.72 at baseline out of a possible maximum of 10 to 3.05 in the lipid ibuprofen group, from 5.6 to 3.26 in patients on standard ibuprofen at 1,200 mg/day, and from 5.61 to 2.82 in subjects on standard ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day. Those between-group differences were not statistically significant, reported Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra, professor of osteoarthritis and related disorders at Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam.

In contrast, the rate of gastrointestinal side effects was significantly different across the three treatment arms: 16.2% in the lipid ibuprofen group, 22.6% with conventional ibuprofen at 1,200 mg/day, and 28.3% with ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day, she said at the congress, which was sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The group on the investigational formulation of ibuprofen also showed a consistent trend for superior results on the WOMAC swelling, pain, stiffness, and function subscales after 5 days of treatment, although only the improvement in swelling achieved statistical significance, Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra continued.

Flarin is approved and marketed in the United Kingdom. Infirst Healthcare, the novel NSAID’s developer and the sponsor of the phase III randomized trial, is seeking to gain regulatory approval throughout Europe. The U.K. company also has an agreement with McNeil Consumer Pharmaceuticals to market its products in the United States, once approved.

Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra reported having received a research grant from Infirst.

 

– A novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen given at 1,200 mg/day proved noninferior to high-dose standard ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day for management of episodic knee pain flares in a phase III randomized trial, and it accomplished this with significantly fewer gastrointestinal side effects, Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra, MD, reported.

Episodic flares of knee pain are a disabling feature of knee osteoarthritis that can occur at all stages of the disease, including prior to clinical diagnosis. There is a need for a fast-acting analgesic designed for short-term use with minimal side effects to provide pain relief during these flares. This was the motivation for developing Flarin, a lipid formulation soft-gel capsule of ibuprofen that is effective at less-than-standard doses of the conventional NSAID, she explained at the World Congress on Osteoarthritis.

Dr. Sita M.A. Bierma-Zeinstra
She presented results of a triple-arm randomized trial conducted in primary care offices in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The phase III study included 462 adults up to age 70 with a history of at least one flare of knee pain during the prior year, along with another such episode underway for less than 24 hours at the time of enrollment. The patients were assigned to the novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen in soft-gel capsules at 1,200 mg/day or to conventional ibuprofen in soft-gel capsules at either 1,200 or 2,400 mg/day.

The primary outcome was change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale after 5 days of treatment. The score dropped from a mean of 5.72 at baseline out of a possible maximum of 10 to 3.05 in the lipid ibuprofen group, from 5.6 to 3.26 in patients on standard ibuprofen at 1,200 mg/day, and from 5.61 to 2.82 in subjects on standard ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day. Those between-group differences were not statistically significant, reported Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra, professor of osteoarthritis and related disorders at Erasmus University Medical Center in Rotterdam.

In contrast, the rate of gastrointestinal side effects was significantly different across the three treatment arms: 16.2% in the lipid ibuprofen group, 22.6% with conventional ibuprofen at 1,200 mg/day, and 28.3% with ibuprofen at 2,400 mg/day, she said at the congress, which was sponsored by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.

The group on the investigational formulation of ibuprofen also showed a consistent trend for superior results on the WOMAC swelling, pain, stiffness, and function subscales after 5 days of treatment, although only the improvement in swelling achieved statistical significance, Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra continued.

Flarin is approved and marketed in the United Kingdom. Infirst Healthcare, the novel NSAID’s developer and the sponsor of the phase III randomized trial, is seeking to gain regulatory approval throughout Europe. The U.K. company also has an agreement with McNeil Consumer Pharmaceuticals to market its products in the United States, once approved.

Dr. Bierma-Zeinstra reported having received a research grant from Infirst.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT OARSI 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen is as effective for pain relief as is twice the dose of standard ibuprofen, and with significantly fewer GI side effects.

Major finding: The incidence of GI side effects in patients being treated for an episodic knee pain flare was 16.2% after 5 days of treatment with a novel lipid formulation of ibuprofen at 1,200 mg/day, significantly lower than in patients randomized to conventional ibuprofen soft-gel capsules at 1,200 or 2,400 mg/day.

Data source: This three-arm, multicenter, international randomized trial involved 462 patients experiencing a recent-onset episodic flare of knee pain.

Disclosures: The presenter reported having received a research grant from Infirst Healthcare, which funded the study.

Panel revises spondyloarthritis treat-to-target recommendations

ASDAS makes sense but evidence needed
Article Type
Changed
Tue, 02/07/2023 - 16:57

 

– The newly revised recommendations from an unaffiliated, international expert panel on a treat-to-target approach for axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis has one conspicuous feature that the prior recommendations lacked: evidence.

The first treat-to-target recommendations for spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from 2013 were based entirely on expert opinion (Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73[1]:6-16), but in the new update 4 of the 11 recommendations now have an evidence base as well as a fifth recommendation for the part that pertains to PsA, Désirée van der Heijde, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Désirée van der Heijde
In 2013, “we had no evidence,” but enough new findings accumulated during 2011-2016 to now back up almost half of the recommendations, said Dr. van der Heijde, professor of rheumatology at Leiden (the Netherlands) University Medical Center and spokesperson for the revision task force.

Among the evidence-based recommendations, the most striking was a new formulation for how to measure disease activity. The new recommendations call the ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) the “preferred” disease activity measure for patients with axial SpA and cite both the DAPSA (Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis) as well as minimal disease activity as “considered to define the target” when treating PsA.

“This recommendation just made it,” squeaking onto the list with a 52% vote of approval from the task force members, said Dr. van der Heijde. “It had the longest discussion,” with a significant minority of panelists taking a different view.

ASDAS shook out as the preferred measure for axial SpA because of evidence linking a patient’s ASDAS with syndesmophyte formation. “The idea is that by targeting ASDAS you should have better outcomes,” she explained.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Maxime Dougados
If ASDAS is to become the go-to assessment for managing axial SpA, then many more physicians will need to use it. Just before Dr. van der Heijde unveiled the revised recommendations, Maxime Dougados, MD, spoke about challenges in applying the treat-to-target strategy to axial SpA. One challenge is getting physicians to make the necessary assessments in routine practice. He cited data collected from 32 rheumatology practices in the Paris area showing that fewer than 1% of patients had undergone ASDAS assessment (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Nov/Dec;33[6]:851-7).

“Applying a treat-to-target approach in axial SpA is feasible but requires systematic collection of outcome parameters in daily practice,” such as ASDAS, said Dr. Dougados, professor of rheumatology at Cochin Hospital in Paris. Another piece currently lacking in the case for treat-to-target is demonstration of the clinical benefit from this approach in a trial, he added.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Jurgen Braun
Outcome measures of disease activity such as the ASDAS, as well as the Disease Activity Score 28 for rheumatoid arthritis, “are instrumental to reach the targets set” in a treat-to-target strategy, agreed Jürgen Braun, MD, professor of rheumatology and medical director of the Rheumatology Center in Herne, Germany, and another speaker during the session.

According to Dr. van der Heijde, the other four recommendations that now have evidence backup are:

  • Define clinical remission or minimal disease as the absence of clinical and laboratory evidence of significant disease activity.
  • An alternative treatment target for PsA may be low or minimal disease activity.
  • Measure disease activity by clinical signs and symptoms and by acute phase reactants.
  • Once a treatment target is reached it should be maintained.

The task force also outlined “an extensive research agenda” where evidence is needed, specifying close to 50 individual research topics. Among them Dr. van der Heijde particularly called out the role of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), validation of PsA target outcomes, and better parsing of the differences using remission or low disease activity as the treatment target.

Dr. van der Heijde, Dr. Dougados, and Dr. Braun are all consultants for several drug companies.

Body

 

The evidence we now have is the difference between the new recommendations and the prior version. We have evidence from trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis using minimal disease activity as a target. And we have indirect evidence from observational studies in patients with SpA that suggest the higher the ASDAS, the more progression occurs. In addition, results reported at the EULAR 2017 Congress showed that reductions in the ASDAS appeared to correlate with the effect of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor on reduced radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. But this is just an association; data from a randomized, prospective trial should be available next year.

Mitchell L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Lianne S. Gensler
Although the data today are incomplete, I agree that the ASDAS is the best measure we have for disease activity in patients with axial SpA. Based on data reported at EULAR, it seems that an ASDAS of less than 1.3 is the right target for many axial SpA patients, although every patient has a different target that must be individualized. Every patient has a different risk and benefit agenda; the target must be very patient centered.

The recommendations say to manage patients with axial SpA or psoriatic arthritis by treating them to a target. To do that a clinician needs a standardized assessment of a patient’s disease and to perform follow-up measurements to see if the target is met. The data Dr. Dougados cited from Paris document that assessments such as an ASDAS are rarely made. Getting an ASDAS means knowing either a patient’s C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate. That requires blood work before a clinic visit, something patients often don’t want.

Will these recommendations change practice and make the ASDAS more widely used? That depends to some extent on whether any benefits or penalties linked to ASDAS use go into place.

Next year, we expect to see results from trials that are testing whether the treat-to-target approach produces better outcomes. Evidence like that will be important to further spur adoption.
 

Lianne S. Gensler, MD , is director of the ankylosing spondylitis clinic at the University of California, San Francisco. She has been a consultant to Novartis and Janssen and has received research support from AbbVie and UCB. Dr. Gensler was a member of the task force that issued the revised recommendations. She made these comments in an interview.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles
Body

 

The evidence we now have is the difference between the new recommendations and the prior version. We have evidence from trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis using minimal disease activity as a target. And we have indirect evidence from observational studies in patients with SpA that suggest the higher the ASDAS, the more progression occurs. In addition, results reported at the EULAR 2017 Congress showed that reductions in the ASDAS appeared to correlate with the effect of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor on reduced radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. But this is just an association; data from a randomized, prospective trial should be available next year.

Mitchell L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Lianne S. Gensler
Although the data today are incomplete, I agree that the ASDAS is the best measure we have for disease activity in patients with axial SpA. Based on data reported at EULAR, it seems that an ASDAS of less than 1.3 is the right target for many axial SpA patients, although every patient has a different target that must be individualized. Every patient has a different risk and benefit agenda; the target must be very patient centered.

The recommendations say to manage patients with axial SpA or psoriatic arthritis by treating them to a target. To do that a clinician needs a standardized assessment of a patient’s disease and to perform follow-up measurements to see if the target is met. The data Dr. Dougados cited from Paris document that assessments such as an ASDAS are rarely made. Getting an ASDAS means knowing either a patient’s C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate. That requires blood work before a clinic visit, something patients often don’t want.

Will these recommendations change practice and make the ASDAS more widely used? That depends to some extent on whether any benefits or penalties linked to ASDAS use go into place.

Next year, we expect to see results from trials that are testing whether the treat-to-target approach produces better outcomes. Evidence like that will be important to further spur adoption.
 

Lianne S. Gensler, MD , is director of the ankylosing spondylitis clinic at the University of California, San Francisco. She has been a consultant to Novartis and Janssen and has received research support from AbbVie and UCB. Dr. Gensler was a member of the task force that issued the revised recommendations. She made these comments in an interview.

Body

 

The evidence we now have is the difference between the new recommendations and the prior version. We have evidence from trials in patients with psoriatic arthritis using minimal disease activity as a target. And we have indirect evidence from observational studies in patients with SpA that suggest the higher the ASDAS, the more progression occurs. In addition, results reported at the EULAR 2017 Congress showed that reductions in the ASDAS appeared to correlate with the effect of a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor on reduced radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. But this is just an association; data from a randomized, prospective trial should be available next year.

Mitchell L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Lianne S. Gensler
Although the data today are incomplete, I agree that the ASDAS is the best measure we have for disease activity in patients with axial SpA. Based on data reported at EULAR, it seems that an ASDAS of less than 1.3 is the right target for many axial SpA patients, although every patient has a different target that must be individualized. Every patient has a different risk and benefit agenda; the target must be very patient centered.

The recommendations say to manage patients with axial SpA or psoriatic arthritis by treating them to a target. To do that a clinician needs a standardized assessment of a patient’s disease and to perform follow-up measurements to see if the target is met. The data Dr. Dougados cited from Paris document that assessments such as an ASDAS are rarely made. Getting an ASDAS means knowing either a patient’s C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate. That requires blood work before a clinic visit, something patients often don’t want.

Will these recommendations change practice and make the ASDAS more widely used? That depends to some extent on whether any benefits or penalties linked to ASDAS use go into place.

Next year, we expect to see results from trials that are testing whether the treat-to-target approach produces better outcomes. Evidence like that will be important to further spur adoption.
 

Lianne S. Gensler, MD , is director of the ankylosing spondylitis clinic at the University of California, San Francisco. She has been a consultant to Novartis and Janssen and has received research support from AbbVie and UCB. Dr. Gensler was a member of the task force that issued the revised recommendations. She made these comments in an interview.

Title
ASDAS makes sense but evidence needed
ASDAS makes sense but evidence needed

 

– The newly revised recommendations from an unaffiliated, international expert panel on a treat-to-target approach for axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis has one conspicuous feature that the prior recommendations lacked: evidence.

The first treat-to-target recommendations for spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from 2013 were based entirely on expert opinion (Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73[1]:6-16), but in the new update 4 of the 11 recommendations now have an evidence base as well as a fifth recommendation for the part that pertains to PsA, Désirée van der Heijde, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Désirée van der Heijde
In 2013, “we had no evidence,” but enough new findings accumulated during 2011-2016 to now back up almost half of the recommendations, said Dr. van der Heijde, professor of rheumatology at Leiden (the Netherlands) University Medical Center and spokesperson for the revision task force.

Among the evidence-based recommendations, the most striking was a new formulation for how to measure disease activity. The new recommendations call the ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) the “preferred” disease activity measure for patients with axial SpA and cite both the DAPSA (Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis) as well as minimal disease activity as “considered to define the target” when treating PsA.

“This recommendation just made it,” squeaking onto the list with a 52% vote of approval from the task force members, said Dr. van der Heijde. “It had the longest discussion,” with a significant minority of panelists taking a different view.

ASDAS shook out as the preferred measure for axial SpA because of evidence linking a patient’s ASDAS with syndesmophyte formation. “The idea is that by targeting ASDAS you should have better outcomes,” she explained.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Maxime Dougados
If ASDAS is to become the go-to assessment for managing axial SpA, then many more physicians will need to use it. Just before Dr. van der Heijde unveiled the revised recommendations, Maxime Dougados, MD, spoke about challenges in applying the treat-to-target strategy to axial SpA. One challenge is getting physicians to make the necessary assessments in routine practice. He cited data collected from 32 rheumatology practices in the Paris area showing that fewer than 1% of patients had undergone ASDAS assessment (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Nov/Dec;33[6]:851-7).

“Applying a treat-to-target approach in axial SpA is feasible but requires systematic collection of outcome parameters in daily practice,” such as ASDAS, said Dr. Dougados, professor of rheumatology at Cochin Hospital in Paris. Another piece currently lacking in the case for treat-to-target is demonstration of the clinical benefit from this approach in a trial, he added.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Jurgen Braun
Outcome measures of disease activity such as the ASDAS, as well as the Disease Activity Score 28 for rheumatoid arthritis, “are instrumental to reach the targets set” in a treat-to-target strategy, agreed Jürgen Braun, MD, professor of rheumatology and medical director of the Rheumatology Center in Herne, Germany, and another speaker during the session.

According to Dr. van der Heijde, the other four recommendations that now have evidence backup are:

  • Define clinical remission or minimal disease as the absence of clinical and laboratory evidence of significant disease activity.
  • An alternative treatment target for PsA may be low or minimal disease activity.
  • Measure disease activity by clinical signs and symptoms and by acute phase reactants.
  • Once a treatment target is reached it should be maintained.

The task force also outlined “an extensive research agenda” where evidence is needed, specifying close to 50 individual research topics. Among them Dr. van der Heijde particularly called out the role of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), validation of PsA target outcomes, and better parsing of the differences using remission or low disease activity as the treatment target.

Dr. van der Heijde, Dr. Dougados, and Dr. Braun are all consultants for several drug companies.

 

– The newly revised recommendations from an unaffiliated, international expert panel on a treat-to-target approach for axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis has one conspicuous feature that the prior recommendations lacked: evidence.

The first treat-to-target recommendations for spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from 2013 were based entirely on expert opinion (Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73[1]:6-16), but in the new update 4 of the 11 recommendations now have an evidence base as well as a fifth recommendation for the part that pertains to PsA, Désirée van der Heijde, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Désirée van der Heijde
In 2013, “we had no evidence,” but enough new findings accumulated during 2011-2016 to now back up almost half of the recommendations, said Dr. van der Heijde, professor of rheumatology at Leiden (the Netherlands) University Medical Center and spokesperson for the revision task force.

Among the evidence-based recommendations, the most striking was a new formulation for how to measure disease activity. The new recommendations call the ASDAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) the “preferred” disease activity measure for patients with axial SpA and cite both the DAPSA (Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis) as well as minimal disease activity as “considered to define the target” when treating PsA.

“This recommendation just made it,” squeaking onto the list with a 52% vote of approval from the task force members, said Dr. van der Heijde. “It had the longest discussion,” with a significant minority of panelists taking a different view.

ASDAS shook out as the preferred measure for axial SpA because of evidence linking a patient’s ASDAS with syndesmophyte formation. “The idea is that by targeting ASDAS you should have better outcomes,” she explained.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Maxime Dougados
If ASDAS is to become the go-to assessment for managing axial SpA, then many more physicians will need to use it. Just before Dr. van der Heijde unveiled the revised recommendations, Maxime Dougados, MD, spoke about challenges in applying the treat-to-target strategy to axial SpA. One challenge is getting physicians to make the necessary assessments in routine practice. He cited data collected from 32 rheumatology practices in the Paris area showing that fewer than 1% of patients had undergone ASDAS assessment (Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Nov/Dec;33[6]:851-7).

“Applying a treat-to-target approach in axial SpA is feasible but requires systematic collection of outcome parameters in daily practice,” such as ASDAS, said Dr. Dougados, professor of rheumatology at Cochin Hospital in Paris. Another piece currently lacking in the case for treat-to-target is demonstration of the clinical benefit from this approach in a trial, he added.

Courtesy of EULAR
Dr. Jurgen Braun
Outcome measures of disease activity such as the ASDAS, as well as the Disease Activity Score 28 for rheumatoid arthritis, “are instrumental to reach the targets set” in a treat-to-target strategy, agreed Jürgen Braun, MD, professor of rheumatology and medical director of the Rheumatology Center in Herne, Germany, and another speaker during the session.

According to Dr. van der Heijde, the other four recommendations that now have evidence backup are:

  • Define clinical remission or minimal disease as the absence of clinical and laboratory evidence of significant disease activity.
  • An alternative treatment target for PsA may be low or minimal disease activity.
  • Measure disease activity by clinical signs and symptoms and by acute phase reactants.
  • Once a treatment target is reached it should be maintained.

The task force also outlined “an extensive research agenda” where evidence is needed, specifying close to 50 individual research topics. Among them Dr. van der Heijde particularly called out the role of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), validation of PsA target outcomes, and better parsing of the differences using remission or low disease activity as the treatment target.

Dr. van der Heijde, Dr. Dougados, and Dr. Braun are all consultants for several drug companies.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM THE EULAR 2017 CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.

Chemo-free triplet produces ‘favorable’ results in advanced disease

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 01/17/2023 - 11:17
Display Headline
Chemo-free triplet produces ‘favorable’ results in advanced disease

 

Mantle cell lymphoma

 

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND—A chemotherapy-free combination regimen has demonstrated “favorable” safety and efficacy in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

 

They found that treatment with ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib produced responses in patients with CLL/SLL, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

 

Many of these patients are still receiving the combination, some of them beyond 1 year, said Lorretta Nastoupil, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.

 

She presented results with the treatment at the 14th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML).

 

The research was sponsored by TG Therapeutics, the company developing ublituximab (TG-1101) and umbralisib (TGR-1202).

 

Patients and treatment

 

Dr Nastoupil presented data on 38 patients—20 with CLL/SLL, and 18 with NHL. Three of the CLL/SLL patients were treatment-naïve. The rest had relapsed/refractory disease.

 

All NHL patients had relapsed/refractory disease—6 with DLBCL, 6 with FL, 4 with MCL, and 2 with MZL.

 

For the entire cohort, the median age was 65 (range, 32-85), and most patients (n=29) were male. They had received a median of 3 prior treatment regimens (range, 0-6).

 

In this trial, the patients received:

 

 

 

 

 

  • Ublituximab at 900 mg
  • Ibrutinib at 420 mg (CLL/SLL) or 560 mg (NHL)
  • Umbralisib at 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg.

Eighty-one percent of patients have been on study for more than 6 months. The median time on study is 11.1 months (range, 0.4 to 30+ months).

 

Safety

 

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity in the CLL cohort (umbralisib at 400 mg)—reactivated varicella zoster. And 2 patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (AE)—1 due to sepsis and 1 due to pneumonia.

 

Neutropenia (18%) and pneumonia (11%) were the only grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in more than 10% of patients. Other grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (8%), diarrhea (3%), dizziness (3%), pyrexia (3%), rash (3%), anemia (3%), dyspnea (3%), and stomatitis (3%).

 

The most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (47%), fatigue (47%), dizziness (37%), insomnia (34%), nausea (34%), neutropenia (32%), cough (32%), and infusion-related reactions (32%).

 

Efficacy

 

Thirty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy—19 with CLL/SLL and 17 with NHL patients. Two patients discontinued treatment before the first efficacy assessment—1 due to pneumonia and 1 at investigator discretion.

 

For the entire cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) was 83%.

 

In the CLL/SLL cohort, the ORR was 100% (19/19), and the complete response (CR) rate was 32% (n=6). However, 4 of the 6 CRs are pending bone marrow confirmation.

 

Dr Nastoupil noted that 8 of the CLL patients had a 17p and/or 11q deletion, and 3 had previously received treatment with a BTK and/or PI3Kδ inhibitor.

 

One patient who was refractory to both idelalisib and ibrutinib achieved a CR with the triplet regimen, and this response has been ongoing for more than 1.5 years.

 

Among patients with NHL, the ORR was 100% in patients with MZL (2/2) and MCL (4/4). The ORR was 80% (4/5) in FL patients, and 17% (1/6) in DLBCL patients.

 

The CR rate was 50% in patients with MZL (1/2) and MCL (2/4) and 20% in patients with FL (1/5).

 

Dr Nastoupil pointed out that the FL patients were heavily pretreated. Two of them had received an autologous stem cell transplant, 1 was refractory to prior ibrutinib treatment, and 1 had received 5 prior lines of rituximab-based therapy.

 

She also noted that the DLBCL patients had a median of 4 prior therapies, and 4 of these patients had non-GCB DLBCL, including the only patient who responded to the triplet.

 

 

 

“[T]he combination of ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib in advanced CLL and NHL demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile as well as favorable efficacy,” Dr Nastoupil said in closing.

 

“[This] suggests umbralisib may be safely combined with other targeted agents to overcome mechanisms of resistance.” 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Mantle cell lymphoma

 

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND—A chemotherapy-free combination regimen has demonstrated “favorable” safety and efficacy in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

 

They found that treatment with ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib produced responses in patients with CLL/SLL, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

 

Many of these patients are still receiving the combination, some of them beyond 1 year, said Lorretta Nastoupil, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.

 

She presented results with the treatment at the 14th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML).

 

The research was sponsored by TG Therapeutics, the company developing ublituximab (TG-1101) and umbralisib (TGR-1202).

 

Patients and treatment

 

Dr Nastoupil presented data on 38 patients—20 with CLL/SLL, and 18 with NHL. Three of the CLL/SLL patients were treatment-naïve. The rest had relapsed/refractory disease.

 

All NHL patients had relapsed/refractory disease—6 with DLBCL, 6 with FL, 4 with MCL, and 2 with MZL.

 

For the entire cohort, the median age was 65 (range, 32-85), and most patients (n=29) were male. They had received a median of 3 prior treatment regimens (range, 0-6).

 

In this trial, the patients received:

 

 

 

 

 

  • Ublituximab at 900 mg
  • Ibrutinib at 420 mg (CLL/SLL) or 560 mg (NHL)
  • Umbralisib at 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg.

Eighty-one percent of patients have been on study for more than 6 months. The median time on study is 11.1 months (range, 0.4 to 30+ months).

 

Safety

 

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity in the CLL cohort (umbralisib at 400 mg)—reactivated varicella zoster. And 2 patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (AE)—1 due to sepsis and 1 due to pneumonia.

 

Neutropenia (18%) and pneumonia (11%) were the only grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in more than 10% of patients. Other grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (8%), diarrhea (3%), dizziness (3%), pyrexia (3%), rash (3%), anemia (3%), dyspnea (3%), and stomatitis (3%).

 

The most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (47%), fatigue (47%), dizziness (37%), insomnia (34%), nausea (34%), neutropenia (32%), cough (32%), and infusion-related reactions (32%).

 

Efficacy

 

Thirty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy—19 with CLL/SLL and 17 with NHL patients. Two patients discontinued treatment before the first efficacy assessment—1 due to pneumonia and 1 at investigator discretion.

 

For the entire cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) was 83%.

 

In the CLL/SLL cohort, the ORR was 100% (19/19), and the complete response (CR) rate was 32% (n=6). However, 4 of the 6 CRs are pending bone marrow confirmation.

 

Dr Nastoupil noted that 8 of the CLL patients had a 17p and/or 11q deletion, and 3 had previously received treatment with a BTK and/or PI3Kδ inhibitor.

 

One patient who was refractory to both idelalisib and ibrutinib achieved a CR with the triplet regimen, and this response has been ongoing for more than 1.5 years.

 

Among patients with NHL, the ORR was 100% in patients with MZL (2/2) and MCL (4/4). The ORR was 80% (4/5) in FL patients, and 17% (1/6) in DLBCL patients.

 

The CR rate was 50% in patients with MZL (1/2) and MCL (2/4) and 20% in patients with FL (1/5).

 

Dr Nastoupil pointed out that the FL patients were heavily pretreated. Two of them had received an autologous stem cell transplant, 1 was refractory to prior ibrutinib treatment, and 1 had received 5 prior lines of rituximab-based therapy.

 

She also noted that the DLBCL patients had a median of 4 prior therapies, and 4 of these patients had non-GCB DLBCL, including the only patient who responded to the triplet.

 

 

 

“[T]he combination of ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib in advanced CLL and NHL demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile as well as favorable efficacy,” Dr Nastoupil said in closing.

 

“[This] suggests umbralisib may be safely combined with other targeted agents to overcome mechanisms of resistance.” 

 

Mantle cell lymphoma

 

LUGANO, SWITZERLAND—A chemotherapy-free combination regimen has demonstrated “favorable” safety and efficacy in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to researchers.

 

They found that treatment with ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib produced responses in patients with CLL/SLL, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

 

Many of these patients are still receiving the combination, some of them beyond 1 year, said Lorretta Nastoupil, MD, of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.

 

She presented results with the treatment at the 14th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML).

 

The research was sponsored by TG Therapeutics, the company developing ublituximab (TG-1101) and umbralisib (TGR-1202).

 

Patients and treatment

 

Dr Nastoupil presented data on 38 patients—20 with CLL/SLL, and 18 with NHL. Three of the CLL/SLL patients were treatment-naïve. The rest had relapsed/refractory disease.

 

All NHL patients had relapsed/refractory disease—6 with DLBCL, 6 with FL, 4 with MCL, and 2 with MZL.

 

For the entire cohort, the median age was 65 (range, 32-85), and most patients (n=29) were male. They had received a median of 3 prior treatment regimens (range, 0-6).

 

In this trial, the patients received:

 

 

 

 

 

  • Ublituximab at 900 mg
  • Ibrutinib at 420 mg (CLL/SLL) or 560 mg (NHL)
  • Umbralisib at 400 mg, 600 mg, or 800 mg.

Eighty-one percent of patients have been on study for more than 6 months. The median time on study is 11.1 months (range, 0.4 to 30+ months).

 

Safety

 

There was 1 dose-limiting toxicity in the CLL cohort (umbralisib at 400 mg)—reactivated varicella zoster. And 2 patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (AE)—1 due to sepsis and 1 due to pneumonia.

 

Neutropenia (18%) and pneumonia (11%) were the only grade 3/4 AEs that occurred in more than 10% of patients. Other grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (8%), diarrhea (3%), dizziness (3%), pyrexia (3%), rash (3%), anemia (3%), dyspnea (3%), and stomatitis (3%).

 

The most common AEs of any grade were diarrhea (47%), fatigue (47%), dizziness (37%), insomnia (34%), nausea (34%), neutropenia (32%), cough (32%), and infusion-related reactions (32%).

 

Efficacy

 

Thirty-six patients were evaluable for efficacy—19 with CLL/SLL and 17 with NHL patients. Two patients discontinued treatment before the first efficacy assessment—1 due to pneumonia and 1 at investigator discretion.

 

For the entire cohort, the overall response rate (ORR) was 83%.

 

In the CLL/SLL cohort, the ORR was 100% (19/19), and the complete response (CR) rate was 32% (n=6). However, 4 of the 6 CRs are pending bone marrow confirmation.

 

Dr Nastoupil noted that 8 of the CLL patients had a 17p and/or 11q deletion, and 3 had previously received treatment with a BTK and/or PI3Kδ inhibitor.

 

One patient who was refractory to both idelalisib and ibrutinib achieved a CR with the triplet regimen, and this response has been ongoing for more than 1.5 years.

 

Among patients with NHL, the ORR was 100% in patients with MZL (2/2) and MCL (4/4). The ORR was 80% (4/5) in FL patients, and 17% (1/6) in DLBCL patients.

 

The CR rate was 50% in patients with MZL (1/2) and MCL (2/4) and 20% in patients with FL (1/5).

 

Dr Nastoupil pointed out that the FL patients were heavily pretreated. Two of them had received an autologous stem cell transplant, 1 was refractory to prior ibrutinib treatment, and 1 had received 5 prior lines of rituximab-based therapy.

 

She also noted that the DLBCL patients had a median of 4 prior therapies, and 4 of these patients had non-GCB DLBCL, including the only patient who responded to the triplet.

 

 

 

“[T]he combination of ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib in advanced CLL and NHL demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile as well as favorable efficacy,” Dr Nastoupil said in closing.

 

“[This] suggests umbralisib may be safely combined with other targeted agents to overcome mechanisms of resistance.” 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Chemo-free triplet produces ‘favorable’ results in advanced disease
Display Headline
Chemo-free triplet produces ‘favorable’ results in advanced disease
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica