SAN DIEGO – The former president of the Endocrine Society told diabetes educators that it’s time to replace the much-used hemoglobin A_1c level with a measurement that better reflects how diabetes patients are faring.

The problem is that the HbA_1c is “woefully inadequate,” said Robert Vigersky, MD, the medical director of Medtronic Diabetes and president of the Endocrine Society in 2009-2010. “It doesn’t tell you about time-in-range or the frequency, duration, and severity of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. And there’s nothing about glycemic variability.”

These measurements are important, he told an audience at the annual meeting of the American Association of Diabetes Educators. For example, “there are several new classes of medication and new technologies. Some decrease HbA_1c with no effect on hypoglycemia. Some affect hypoglycemia with no effect on HbA_1c. How do we think about these globally and compare them to one another?”

To shed more light on the true condition of patients, he said, it’s time to “change the conversation from HbA_1c alone to one that is more glucose-centric. It’s about thinking about glucose as a vital sign, not HbA_1c. This may help health care providers, regulators, and payers better understand what is best for patients.”

He is also thinking about going beyond sugar levels. “Maybe a future composite metric will have more than just glucose numbers,” he said.

Indeed, last hear Dr. Vigersky proposed a composite metric known as “the hypoglycemia-A1C score” that can also take factors like weight, quality of life and costs into account (J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 19;9[5]:1148-51).

But he acknowledged there are challenges. For one, there are at least a dozen different ways to measure hypoglycemia, he said, “and every paper cherry-picks the method they want to show their data in the best light.”

It’s also not clear how best to represent the data once researchers figure out which statistics should be included. Should the overall measurement be a single number? Or should there be multiple numbers? In that case, should the numbers be represented graphically?

Dr. Vigersky said he is working on an approach that illustrates various measurements through a pentagon shape. Its appearance reflects measurements such as mean glucose and duration of high glucose.

However, he predicted the future will produce a simpler measurement: “a multicomponent single value.”

What’s next? “We need to educate the payers about how we can’t stay with HbA_1c. This will take an effort with professional societies. Once everyone agrees, we need to get some consensus about what the elements of the composite metric are.”

Dr. Vigersky is hopeful that the HbA_1c is on its way out, although he acknowledges that it won’t be a rapid process. “It took 20 or more years for everyone to buy into A1C and understand what it represented,” he said. “Changing the conversation isn’t going to happen overnight. But unless we start to address it, it will never happen.”

Dr. Vigersky reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – The former president of the Endocrine Society told diabetes educators that it’s time to replace the much-used hemoglobin A_1c level with a measurement that better reflects how diabetes patients are faring.

The problem is that the HbA_1c is “woefully inadequate,” said Robert Vigersky, MD, the medical director of Medtronic Diabetes and president of the Endocrine Society in 2009-2010. “It doesn’t tell you about time-in-range or the frequency, duration, and severity of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. And there’s nothing about glycemic variability.”

These measurements are important, he told an audience at the annual meeting of the American Association of Diabetes Educators. For example, “there are several new classes of medication and new technologies. Some decrease HbA_1c with no effect on hypoglycemia. Some affect hypoglycemia with no effect on HbA_1c. How do we think about these globally and compare them to one another?”

To shed more light on the true condition of patients, he said, it’s time to “change the conversation from HbA_1c alone to one that is more glucose-centric. It’s about thinking about glucose as a vital sign, not HbA_1c. This may help health care providers, regulators, and payers better understand what is best for patients.”

He is also thinking about going beyond sugar levels. “Maybe a future composite metric will have more than just glucose numbers,” he said.

Indeed, last hear Dr. Vigersky proposed a composite metric known as “the hypoglycemia-A1C score” that can also take factors like weight, quality of life and costs into account (J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 19;9[5]:1148-51).

But he acknowledged there are challenges. For one, there are at least a dozen different ways to measure hypoglycemia, he said, “and every paper cherry-picks the method they want to show their data in the best light.”

It’s also not clear how best to represent the data once researchers figure out which statistics should be included. Should the overall measurement be a single number? Or should there be multiple numbers? In that case, should the numbers be represented graphically?

Dr. Vigersky said he is working on an approach that illustrates various measurements through a pentagon shape. Its appearance reflects measurements such as mean glucose and duration of high glucose.

However, he predicted the future will produce a simpler measurement: “a multicomponent single value.”

What’s next? “We need to educate the payers about how we can’t stay with HbA_1c. This will take an effort with professional societies. Once everyone agrees, we need to get some consensus about what the elements of the composite metric are.”

Dr. Vigersky is hopeful that the HbA_1c is on its way out, although he acknowledges that it won’t be a rapid process. “It took 20 or more years for everyone to buy into A1C and understand what it represented,” he said. “Changing the conversation isn’t going to happen overnight. But unless we start to address it, it will never happen.”

Dr. Vigersky reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

SAN DIEGO – The former president of the Endocrine Society told diabetes educators that it’s time to replace the much-used hemoglobin A_1c level with a measurement that better reflects how diabetes patients are faring.

The problem is that the HbA_1c is “woefully inadequate,” said Robert Vigersky, MD, the medical director of Medtronic Diabetes and president of the Endocrine Society in 2009-2010. “It doesn’t tell you about time-in-range or the frequency, duration, and severity of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. And there’s nothing about glycemic variability.”

These measurements are important, he told an audience at the annual meeting of the American Association of Diabetes Educators. For example, “there are several new classes of medication and new technologies. Some decrease HbA_1c with no effect on hypoglycemia. Some affect hypoglycemia with no effect on HbA_1c. How do we think about these globally and compare them to one another?”

To shed more light on the true condition of patients, he said, it’s time to “change the conversation from HbA_1c alone to one that is more glucose-centric. It’s about thinking about glucose as a vital sign, not HbA_1c. This may help health care providers, regulators, and payers better understand what is best for patients.”

He is also thinking about going beyond sugar levels. “Maybe a future composite metric will have more than just glucose numbers,” he said.

Indeed, last hear Dr. Vigersky proposed a composite metric known as “the hypoglycemia-A1C score” that can also take factors like weight, quality of life and costs into account (J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Feb 19;9[5]:1148-51).

But he acknowledged there are challenges. For one, there are at least a dozen different ways to measure hypoglycemia, he said, “and every paper cherry-picks the method they want to show their data in the best light.”

It’s also not clear how best to represent the data once researchers figure out which statistics should be included. Should the overall measurement be a single number? Or should there be multiple numbers? In that case, should the numbers be represented graphically?

Dr. Vigersky said he is working on an approach that illustrates various measurements through a pentagon shape. Its appearance reflects measurements such as mean glucose and duration of high glucose.

However, he predicted the future will produce a simpler measurement: “a multicomponent single value.”

What’s next? “We need to educate the payers about how we can’t stay with HbA_1c. This will take an effort with professional societies. Once everyone agrees, we need to get some consensus about what the elements of the composite metric are.”

Dr. Vigersky is hopeful that the HbA_1c is on its way out, although he acknowledges that it won’t be a rapid process. “It took 20 or more years for everyone to buy into A1C and understand what it represented,” he said. “Changing the conversation isn’t going to happen overnight. But unless we start to address it, it will never happen.”

Dr. Vigersky reported having no relevant financial disclosures.

MINNEAPOLIS – The first study to evaluate tofacitinib’s effectiveness at treating severe alopecia areata in the pediatric population found that the janus kinase inhibitor was effective for more than half of the patients, and well tolerated by all.

Of a case series of 13 pediatric patients who had alopecia areata (AA) and were treated with tofacitinib, 9 (68%) experienced “clinically significant” regrowth of hair, with mean improvement in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of 88% for these responders. The nonresponding group, all of whom had alopecia universalis or totalis, saw essentially no response, with a 1% reduction in SALT score.

Lucy Y. Liu, a medical student at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., presented the findings at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

Ms. Liu and her coinvestigators reported that all of the patients had severe AA by SALT scoring, with an overall mean pretreatment SALT score of 74. Eight of the patients (62%) had alopecia universalis, and two (15%) had alopecia totalis.

The patients ranged in age from 12 to 17 years, with a median age of 15. All but three were male, and patients were an average 9 years old at onset of AA. For patients with alopecia totalis or universalis, the duration of the current episode was a median 1.75 years.

Five patients (38%) had atopic dermatitis, while 1 (8%) had thyroid disease. Three patients (23%) had family members with AA; all but one patient, however, had a family history of autoimmune disease of some sort.

Patients were given tofacitinib 5 mg orally twice daily for 5 months. One patient developed new patches of alopecia during treatment, so the dosing for that patient was increased to 10 mg/5 mg daily.

Adverse events for participants included headaches, upper respiratory infections, and “mild, transient increases in transaminases,” wrote Dr. Lieu and her collaborators. No serious adverse events were reported.

Previous work at Yale had shown that tofacitinib reversed alopecia universalis in a patient who received the medication for plaque psoriasis, and that topical treatment with ruxolitinib, another janus kinase inhibitor, was effective in treating alopecia universalis.

Study limitations included the small sample size and the relatively short duration of follow-up, an important consideration because relapse has been observed after tofacitinib treatment in AA. Still, “Tofacitinib is a promising therapy for the treatment of severe AA in adolescents,” wrote Ms. Liu and her colleagues, recommending randomized clinical trials for further exploration of efficacy and safety in the pediatric population.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

MINNEAPOLIS – The first study to evaluate tofacitinib’s effectiveness at treating severe alopecia areata in the pediatric population found that the janus kinase inhibitor was effective for more than half of the patients, and well tolerated by all.

Of a case series of 13 pediatric patients who had alopecia areata (AA) and were treated with tofacitinib, 9 (68%) experienced “clinically significant” regrowth of hair, with mean improvement in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of 88% for these responders. The nonresponding group, all of whom had alopecia universalis or totalis, saw essentially no response, with a 1% reduction in SALT score.

Lucy Y. Liu, a medical student at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., presented the findings at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

Ms. Liu and her coinvestigators reported that all of the patients had severe AA by SALT scoring, with an overall mean pretreatment SALT score of 74. Eight of the patients (62%) had alopecia universalis, and two (15%) had alopecia totalis.

The patients ranged in age from 12 to 17 years, with a median age of 15. All but three were male, and patients were an average 9 years old at onset of AA. For patients with alopecia totalis or universalis, the duration of the current episode was a median 1.75 years.

Five patients (38%) had atopic dermatitis, while 1 (8%) had thyroid disease. Three patients (23%) had family members with AA; all but one patient, however, had a family history of autoimmune disease of some sort.

Patients were given tofacitinib 5 mg orally twice daily for 5 months. One patient developed new patches of alopecia during treatment, so the dosing for that patient was increased to 10 mg/5 mg daily.

Adverse events for participants included headaches, upper respiratory infections, and “mild, transient increases in transaminases,” wrote Dr. Lieu and her collaborators. No serious adverse events were reported.

Previous work at Yale had shown that tofacitinib reversed alopecia universalis in a patient who received the medication for plaque psoriasis, and that topical treatment with ruxolitinib, another janus kinase inhibitor, was effective in treating alopecia universalis.

Study limitations included the small sample size and the relatively short duration of follow-up, an important consideration because relapse has been observed after tofacitinib treatment in AA. Still, “Tofacitinib is a promising therapy for the treatment of severe AA in adolescents,” wrote Ms. Liu and her colleagues, recommending randomized clinical trials for further exploration of efficacy and safety in the pediatric population.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

MINNEAPOLIS – The first study to evaluate tofacitinib’s effectiveness at treating severe alopecia areata in the pediatric population found that the janus kinase inhibitor was effective for more than half of the patients, and well tolerated by all.

Of a case series of 13 pediatric patients who had alopecia areata (AA) and were treated with tofacitinib, 9 (68%) experienced “clinically significant” regrowth of hair, with mean improvement in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score of 88% for these responders. The nonresponding group, all of whom had alopecia universalis or totalis, saw essentially no response, with a 1% reduction in SALT score.

Lucy Y. Liu, a medical student at Yale University, New Haven, Conn., presented the findings at the annual meeting of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology.

Ms. Liu and her coinvestigators reported that all of the patients had severe AA by SALT scoring, with an overall mean pretreatment SALT score of 74. Eight of the patients (62%) had alopecia universalis, and two (15%) had alopecia totalis.

The patients ranged in age from 12 to 17 years, with a median age of 15. All but three were male, and patients were an average 9 years old at onset of AA. For patients with alopecia totalis or universalis, the duration of the current episode was a median 1.75 years.

Five patients (38%) had atopic dermatitis, while 1 (8%) had thyroid disease. Three patients (23%) had family members with AA; all but one patient, however, had a family history of autoimmune disease of some sort.

Patients were given tofacitinib 5 mg orally twice daily for 5 months. One patient developed new patches of alopecia during treatment, so the dosing for that patient was increased to 10 mg/5 mg daily.

Adverse events for participants included headaches, upper respiratory infections, and “mild, transient increases in transaminases,” wrote Dr. Lieu and her collaborators. No serious adverse events were reported.

Previous work at Yale had shown that tofacitinib reversed alopecia universalis in a patient who received the medication for plaque psoriasis, and that topical treatment with ruxolitinib, another janus kinase inhibitor, was effective in treating alopecia universalis.

Study limitations included the small sample size and the relatively short duration of follow-up, an important consideration because relapse has been observed after tofacitinib treatment in AA. Still, “Tofacitinib is a promising therapy for the treatment of severe AA in adolescents,” wrote Ms. Liu and her colleagues, recommending randomized clinical trials for further exploration of efficacy and safety in the pediatric population.

[email protected]

On Twitter @karioakes

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has initiated a phase I clinical trial of an investigational vaccine designed to protect against yellow fever virus.

According to an NIAID statement, the study will evaluate whether an experimental vaccine developed by the pharmaceutical manufacturer Bavarian Nordic is “safe, tolerable and has the potential to prevent yellow fever virus infection.”

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Muhammad Mahdi Karim/Creative Commons License

Bavarian Nordic’s experimental yellow fever vaccine, called MVA-BN-YF, is based on the company’s proprietary MVA-BN platform, which uses an attenuated version of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus as a vaccine vector to carry yellow fever virus genes into the body. Bavarian Nordic says that more than 7,600 people, including 1,000 who are immunocompromised, have been safely vaccinated with MVA-BN–based vaccines.

The NIAID statement noted that prior studies have suggested that combining MVA-BN with ISA 720, an experimental immune-boosting adjuvant, induces a strong immune response after a single dose of vaccine. One goal of the study will be to assess whether two doses of unadjuvanted vaccine or a single dose of ISA 720 adjuvanted vaccine could provide protection against yellow fever.

NIAID said the placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial will enroll 90 healthy men and women aged 18-45 years who have never been infected with a flavivirus. Participants will be divided into six groups: One will receive the currently licensed yellow fever vaccine (15 participants) and five groups (15 participants each) will receive the investigational Bavarian Nordic vaccine, either with or without an adjuvant. The investigational vaccine will be administered intramuscularly while the licensed yellow fever vaccine will be administered subcutaneously. Trial participants will receive one or two doses of vaccine or placebo, separated by a month.

According to NIAID’s statement, the multisite trial will be conducted by NIAID-funded Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, and Saint Louis (Mo.) University. The Emory Vaccine Center in Decatur, Ga., will assist in evaluating data.

Yellow fever infection usually causes fever, back pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and weakness, but roughly 15% of infected patients develop severe disease manifested as jaundice, hemorrhage, and shock, resulting in potentially fatal kidney, liver, or heart conditions.

The current yellow fever vaccine can produce severe adverse complications, such as neurologic side effects, multiple organ system dysfunction and death, and thus cannot be given to infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and those with compromised immune systems. More than 105 million people in Africa have been vaccinated against yellow fever since 2006, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), but a new outbreak of the disease has caused an estimated 84,000-170,000 severe illnesses and 29,000 to 60,000 deaths in 2013.

For more details about the trial, visit the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials website.

[email protected]

On Twitter @richpizzi

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has initiated a phase I clinical trial of an investigational vaccine designed to protect against yellow fever virus.

According to an NIAID statement, the study will evaluate whether an experimental vaccine developed by the pharmaceutical manufacturer Bavarian Nordic is “safe, tolerable and has the potential to prevent yellow fever virus infection.”

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Muhammad Mahdi Karim/Creative Commons License

Bavarian Nordic’s experimental yellow fever vaccine, called MVA-BN-YF, is based on the company’s proprietary MVA-BN platform, which uses an attenuated version of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus as a vaccine vector to carry yellow fever virus genes into the body. Bavarian Nordic says that more than 7,600 people, including 1,000 who are immunocompromised, have been safely vaccinated with MVA-BN–based vaccines.

The NIAID statement noted that prior studies have suggested that combining MVA-BN with ISA 720, an experimental immune-boosting adjuvant, induces a strong immune response after a single dose of vaccine. One goal of the study will be to assess whether two doses of unadjuvanted vaccine or a single dose of ISA 720 adjuvanted vaccine could provide protection against yellow fever.

NIAID said the placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial will enroll 90 healthy men and women aged 18-45 years who have never been infected with a flavivirus. Participants will be divided into six groups: One will receive the currently licensed yellow fever vaccine (15 participants) and five groups (15 participants each) will receive the investigational Bavarian Nordic vaccine, either with or without an adjuvant. The investigational vaccine will be administered intramuscularly while the licensed yellow fever vaccine will be administered subcutaneously. Trial participants will receive one or two doses of vaccine or placebo, separated by a month.

According to NIAID’s statement, the multisite trial will be conducted by NIAID-funded Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, and Saint Louis (Mo.) University. The Emory Vaccine Center in Decatur, Ga., will assist in evaluating data.

Yellow fever infection usually causes fever, back pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and weakness, but roughly 15% of infected patients develop severe disease manifested as jaundice, hemorrhage, and shock, resulting in potentially fatal kidney, liver, or heart conditions.

The current yellow fever vaccine can produce severe adverse complications, such as neurologic side effects, multiple organ system dysfunction and death, and thus cannot be given to infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and those with compromised immune systems. More than 105 million people in Africa have been vaccinated against yellow fever since 2006, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), but a new outbreak of the disease has caused an estimated 84,000-170,000 severe illnesses and 29,000 to 60,000 deaths in 2013.

For more details about the trial, visit the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials website.

[email protected]

On Twitter @richpizzi

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has initiated a phase I clinical trial of an investigational vaccine designed to protect against yellow fever virus.

According to an NIAID statement, the study will evaluate whether an experimental vaccine developed by the pharmaceutical manufacturer Bavarian Nordic is “safe, tolerable and has the potential to prevent yellow fever virus infection.”

Courtesy Wikimedia Commons/Muhammad Mahdi Karim/Creative Commons License

Bavarian Nordic’s experimental yellow fever vaccine, called MVA-BN-YF, is based on the company’s proprietary MVA-BN platform, which uses an attenuated version of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) virus as a vaccine vector to carry yellow fever virus genes into the body. Bavarian Nordic says that more than 7,600 people, including 1,000 who are immunocompromised, have been safely vaccinated with MVA-BN–based vaccines.

The NIAID statement noted that prior studies have suggested that combining MVA-BN with ISA 720, an experimental immune-boosting adjuvant, induces a strong immune response after a single dose of vaccine. One goal of the study will be to assess whether two doses of unadjuvanted vaccine or a single dose of ISA 720 adjuvanted vaccine could provide protection against yellow fever.

NIAID said the placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial will enroll 90 healthy men and women aged 18-45 years who have never been infected with a flavivirus. Participants will be divided into six groups: One will receive the currently licensed yellow fever vaccine (15 participants) and five groups (15 participants each) will receive the investigational Bavarian Nordic vaccine, either with or without an adjuvant. The investigational vaccine will be administered intramuscularly while the licensed yellow fever vaccine will be administered subcutaneously. Trial participants will receive one or two doses of vaccine or placebo, separated by a month.

According to NIAID’s statement, the multisite trial will be conducted by NIAID-funded Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, and Saint Louis (Mo.) University. The Emory Vaccine Center in Decatur, Ga., will assist in evaluating data.

Yellow fever infection usually causes fever, back pain, headache, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and weakness, but roughly 15% of infected patients develop severe disease manifested as jaundice, hemorrhage, and shock, resulting in potentially fatal kidney, liver, or heart conditions.

The current yellow fever vaccine can produce severe adverse complications, such as neurologic side effects, multiple organ system dysfunction and death, and thus cannot be given to infants, the elderly, pregnant women, and those with compromised immune systems. More than 105 million people in Africa have been vaccinated against yellow fever since 2006, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), but a new outbreak of the disease has caused an estimated 84,000-170,000 severe illnesses and 29,000 to 60,000 deaths in 2013.

For more details about the trial, visit the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials website.

[email protected]

On Twitter @richpizzi

The PiKo-1 device (nSpire Health) has limited utility in determining forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) in children with asthma, according to Jonathan M. Gaffin, MD, and his associates.

In a study of 242 children, spirometry and PiKo-1 devices were used to test FEV1. In the Bland-Altman analysis, it reported a mean difference between FEV₁ measured by spirometry and PiKo-1 of 0.14 L. The PiKo-1 FEV₁ was found to be moderately biased to underestimate FEV₁ with increasing volumes, for every 1-liter increase in spirometry FEV₁, having the difference between spirometry and PiKo-1 increased by 0.19 L (P < .001).

Researchers also used the pulmonary function test (PFT) and t showed variability was 0.4 L for spirometry at 2 SDs, a significant smaller range than seen in the PFT-PiKo confidence intervals (1.1 L). It is noted that this indicates that differences are credited to distinctions in the devices themselves and not within the techniques of the person using them. There was no effect on the order of PFT or PiKo-1 performance (P = .88).

“The findings from this study suggest that the PiKo-1 device has limited utility in assessing FEV₁ in clinical or research settings in children with asthma,” researchers concluded. “Further investigation of its use in this respect and with different populations may prove the device more valuable.”

Find the full study in the Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.06.022).

[email protected]

The PiKo-1 device (nSpire Health) has limited utility in determining forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) in children with asthma, according to Jonathan M. Gaffin, MD, and his associates.

In a study of 242 children, spirometry and PiKo-1 devices were used to test FEV1. In the Bland-Altman analysis, it reported a mean difference between FEV₁ measured by spirometry and PiKo-1 of 0.14 L. The PiKo-1 FEV₁ was found to be moderately biased to underestimate FEV₁ with increasing volumes, for every 1-liter increase in spirometry FEV₁, having the difference between spirometry and PiKo-1 increased by 0.19 L (P < .001).

Researchers also used the pulmonary function test (PFT) and t showed variability was 0.4 L for spirometry at 2 SDs, a significant smaller range than seen in the PFT-PiKo confidence intervals (1.1 L). It is noted that this indicates that differences are credited to distinctions in the devices themselves and not within the techniques of the person using them. There was no effect on the order of PFT or PiKo-1 performance (P = .88).

“The findings from this study suggest that the PiKo-1 device has limited utility in assessing FEV₁ in clinical or research settings in children with asthma,” researchers concluded. “Further investigation of its use in this respect and with different populations may prove the device more valuable.”

Find the full study in the Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.06.022).

[email protected]

The PiKo-1 device (nSpire Health) has limited utility in determining forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) in children with asthma, according to Jonathan M. Gaffin, MD, and his associates.

In a study of 242 children, spirometry and PiKo-1 devices were used to test FEV1. In the Bland-Altman analysis, it reported a mean difference between FEV₁ measured by spirometry and PiKo-1 of 0.14 L. The PiKo-1 FEV₁ was found to be moderately biased to underestimate FEV₁ with increasing volumes, for every 1-liter increase in spirometry FEV₁, having the difference between spirometry and PiKo-1 increased by 0.19 L (P < .001).

Researchers also used the pulmonary function test (PFT) and t showed variability was 0.4 L for spirometry at 2 SDs, a significant smaller range than seen in the PFT-PiKo confidence intervals (1.1 L). It is noted that this indicates that differences are credited to distinctions in the devices themselves and not within the techniques of the person using them. There was no effect on the order of PFT or PiKo-1 performance (P = .88).

“The findings from this study suggest that the PiKo-1 device has limited utility in assessing FEV₁ in clinical or research settings in children with asthma,” researchers concluded. “Further investigation of its use in this respect and with different populations may prove the device more valuable.”

Find the full study in the Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.06.022).

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – Prescribing high-dose rifampicin in addition to antiretroviral therapy reduces 12-month all-cause mortality in patients who are coinfected with tuberculosis and HIV and who have a low CD4 cell count, Corinne S. Merle, MD, reported at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

“Current strategies to reduce TB/HIV mortality rely largely on optimal management of HIV disease with early ART [antiretroviral therapy]. We wanted to look at whether there is value in focusing on the TB side of the problem. This is the first study to look at more intensive TB therapy for reducing mortality; and we think that, at least in patients who are immunosuppressed, there might be some benefit in a more aggressive TB treatment from the start,” said Dr. Merle of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

She presented the results of the open-label, multicenter trial of 747 ART-naive adults from West Africa. All were coinfected with TB/HIV and had a CD4 count of at least 50 cells/mm³ at enrollment. They were randomized to one of three treatment arms: ART starting at 2 weeks combined with standard TB treatment; ART starting at 8 weeks plus standard TB therapy; or ART initiation at 8 weeks coupled with 2 months of high-dose rifampicin (Rifadin) at 15 mg/kg daily, followed by standard TB therapy. None of the participants had multidrug-resistant TB. More than one-quarter of them were undernourished as evidenced by a baseline body mass index below 16 kg/m².

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 12 months. There was no significant difference between the study arms, with a 10% rate in the intensified TB treatment arm and mortality rates of 11% and 14% with standard TB therapy and ART starting after 2 and 8 weeks, respectively.

However, a prespecified secondary analysis restricted to the 159 subjects with a baseline CD4 count below 100 cells/mm³ struck gold. Overall 12-month mortality was 4% in the intensified TB treatment subgroup, compared with 19% in patients on standard TB therapy with ART starting at 2 weeks and 28% with ART starting at 8 weeks. In a Cox regression analysis, severely immunosuppressed patients in the high-dose rifampicin group were an adjusted 88% less likely to die within 12 months than those on standard TB treatment with ART starting at 8 weeks and 80% less likely to die than those starting ART at 2 weeks.

At 18 months after randomization, roughly three-quarters of patients in each study arm had undetectable HIV viral loads.

There was no evidence of an increased risk of hepatotoxicity with 2 months of high-dose rifampicin. Only 4 of nearly 3,800 aspartate aminotransferase measurements obtained during the trial showed grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, Dr. Merle noted.

In a plenary lecture on TB/HIV coinfection at the AIDS 2016 conference, Anton Pozniak, MD, singled out the trial as a sterling example of how to optimize available clinical management tools while awaiting a desperately needed new TB vaccine and better drugs.

More than 1 million new TB cases occur annually in HIV-infected persons, roughly 80% of them in sub-Saharan Africa. There are now 400,000 deaths per year worldwide in coinfected TB/HIV patients. Indeed, TB has become the No. 1 cause of death among people living with HIV infection, said Dr. Pozniak, director of HIV services at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London.

He offered a road map to eliminating TB by the year 2035. At present, the global trend is a 2% per year decline in new cases. Optimizing TB case finding, treatment, and preventive therapy could achieve a 10% per year decrease in new cases. That rate still wouldn’t reach the goal by 2035. But more than a dozen candidate TB vaccines are in the developmental pipeline, including a mycobacterial whole cell extract in phase III testing in China. If a new vaccine can be introduced by 2025, that would be a game changer.

“A new vaccine that could prevent adolescents and adults from developing and transmitting TB would be the single most cost-effective tool in mitigating the epidemic,” he said. “Even if we had only a 60% efficacious vaccine and delivered it to 20% of the target population, it could potentially avert 30-50 million incident cases of TB by 2050.”

A new vaccine plus effective alternatives to the standard 6 months of isoniazid for latency prophylaxis by 2025 are estimated to reduce new cases of TB by an average of 17% per year. That circumstance would mean the end of TB by 2035, Dr. Pozniak declared.

The trial was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership. Dr. Merle reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – Prescribing high-dose rifampicin in addition to antiretroviral therapy reduces 12-month all-cause mortality in patients who are coinfected with tuberculosis and HIV and who have a low CD4 cell count, Corinne S. Merle, MD, reported at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

“Current strategies to reduce TB/HIV mortality rely largely on optimal management of HIV disease with early ART [antiretroviral therapy]. We wanted to look at whether there is value in focusing on the TB side of the problem. This is the first study to look at more intensive TB therapy for reducing mortality; and we think that, at least in patients who are immunosuppressed, there might be some benefit in a more aggressive TB treatment from the start,” said Dr. Merle of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

She presented the results of the open-label, multicenter trial of 747 ART-naive adults from West Africa. All were coinfected with TB/HIV and had a CD4 count of at least 50 cells/mm³ at enrollment. They were randomized to one of three treatment arms: ART starting at 2 weeks combined with standard TB treatment; ART starting at 8 weeks plus standard TB therapy; or ART initiation at 8 weeks coupled with 2 months of high-dose rifampicin (Rifadin) at 15 mg/kg daily, followed by standard TB therapy. None of the participants had multidrug-resistant TB. More than one-quarter of them were undernourished as evidenced by a baseline body mass index below 16 kg/m².

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 12 months. There was no significant difference between the study arms, with a 10% rate in the intensified TB treatment arm and mortality rates of 11% and 14% with standard TB therapy and ART starting after 2 and 8 weeks, respectively.

However, a prespecified secondary analysis restricted to the 159 subjects with a baseline CD4 count below 100 cells/mm³ struck gold. Overall 12-month mortality was 4% in the intensified TB treatment subgroup, compared with 19% in patients on standard TB therapy with ART starting at 2 weeks and 28% with ART starting at 8 weeks. In a Cox regression analysis, severely immunosuppressed patients in the high-dose rifampicin group were an adjusted 88% less likely to die within 12 months than those on standard TB treatment with ART starting at 8 weeks and 80% less likely to die than those starting ART at 2 weeks.

At 18 months after randomization, roughly three-quarters of patients in each study arm had undetectable HIV viral loads.

There was no evidence of an increased risk of hepatotoxicity with 2 months of high-dose rifampicin. Only 4 of nearly 3,800 aspartate aminotransferase measurements obtained during the trial showed grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, Dr. Merle noted.

In a plenary lecture on TB/HIV coinfection at the AIDS 2016 conference, Anton Pozniak, MD, singled out the trial as a sterling example of how to optimize available clinical management tools while awaiting a desperately needed new TB vaccine and better drugs.

More than 1 million new TB cases occur annually in HIV-infected persons, roughly 80% of them in sub-Saharan Africa. There are now 400,000 deaths per year worldwide in coinfected TB/HIV patients. Indeed, TB has become the No. 1 cause of death among people living with HIV infection, said Dr. Pozniak, director of HIV services at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London.

He offered a road map to eliminating TB by the year 2035. At present, the global trend is a 2% per year decline in new cases. Optimizing TB case finding, treatment, and preventive therapy could achieve a 10% per year decrease in new cases. That rate still wouldn’t reach the goal by 2035. But more than a dozen candidate TB vaccines are in the developmental pipeline, including a mycobacterial whole cell extract in phase III testing in China. If a new vaccine can be introduced by 2025, that would be a game changer.

“A new vaccine that could prevent adolescents and adults from developing and transmitting TB would be the single most cost-effective tool in mitigating the epidemic,” he said. “Even if we had only a 60% efficacious vaccine and delivered it to 20% of the target population, it could potentially avert 30-50 million incident cases of TB by 2050.”

A new vaccine plus effective alternatives to the standard 6 months of isoniazid for latency prophylaxis by 2025 are estimated to reduce new cases of TB by an average of 17% per year. That circumstance would mean the end of TB by 2035, Dr. Pozniak declared.

The trial was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership. Dr. Merle reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – Prescribing high-dose rifampicin in addition to antiretroviral therapy reduces 12-month all-cause mortality in patients who are coinfected with tuberculosis and HIV and who have a low CD4 cell count, Corinne S. Merle, MD, reported at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

“Current strategies to reduce TB/HIV mortality rely largely on optimal management of HIV disease with early ART [antiretroviral therapy]. We wanted to look at whether there is value in focusing on the TB side of the problem. This is the first study to look at more intensive TB therapy for reducing mortality; and we think that, at least in patients who are immunosuppressed, there might be some benefit in a more aggressive TB treatment from the start,” said Dr. Merle of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

She presented the results of the open-label, multicenter trial of 747 ART-naive adults from West Africa. All were coinfected with TB/HIV and had a CD4 count of at least 50 cells/mm³ at enrollment. They were randomized to one of three treatment arms: ART starting at 2 weeks combined with standard TB treatment; ART starting at 8 weeks plus standard TB therapy; or ART initiation at 8 weeks coupled with 2 months of high-dose rifampicin (Rifadin) at 15 mg/kg daily, followed by standard TB therapy. None of the participants had multidrug-resistant TB. More than one-quarter of them were undernourished as evidenced by a baseline body mass index below 16 kg/m².

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 12 months. There was no significant difference between the study arms, with a 10% rate in the intensified TB treatment arm and mortality rates of 11% and 14% with standard TB therapy and ART starting after 2 and 8 weeks, respectively.

However, a prespecified secondary analysis restricted to the 159 subjects with a baseline CD4 count below 100 cells/mm³ struck gold. Overall 12-month mortality was 4% in the intensified TB treatment subgroup, compared with 19% in patients on standard TB therapy with ART starting at 2 weeks and 28% with ART starting at 8 weeks. In a Cox regression analysis, severely immunosuppressed patients in the high-dose rifampicin group were an adjusted 88% less likely to die within 12 months than those on standard TB treatment with ART starting at 8 weeks and 80% less likely to die than those starting ART at 2 weeks.

At 18 months after randomization, roughly three-quarters of patients in each study arm had undetectable HIV viral loads.

There was no evidence of an increased risk of hepatotoxicity with 2 months of high-dose rifampicin. Only 4 of nearly 3,800 aspartate aminotransferase measurements obtained during the trial showed grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, Dr. Merle noted.

In a plenary lecture on TB/HIV coinfection at the AIDS 2016 conference, Anton Pozniak, MD, singled out the trial as a sterling example of how to optimize available clinical management tools while awaiting a desperately needed new TB vaccine and better drugs.

More than 1 million new TB cases occur annually in HIV-infected persons, roughly 80% of them in sub-Saharan Africa. There are now 400,000 deaths per year worldwide in coinfected TB/HIV patients. Indeed, TB has become the No. 1 cause of death among people living with HIV infection, said Dr. Pozniak, director of HIV services at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London.

He offered a road map to eliminating TB by the year 2035. At present, the global trend is a 2% per year decline in new cases. Optimizing TB case finding, treatment, and preventive therapy could achieve a 10% per year decrease in new cases. That rate still wouldn’t reach the goal by 2035. But more than a dozen candidate TB vaccines are in the developmental pipeline, including a mycobacterial whole cell extract in phase III testing in China. If a new vaccine can be introduced by 2025, that would be a game changer.

“A new vaccine that could prevent adolescents and adults from developing and transmitting TB would be the single most cost-effective tool in mitigating the epidemic,” he said. “Even if we had only a 60% efficacious vaccine and delivered it to 20% of the target population, it could potentially avert 30-50 million incident cases of TB by 2050.”

A new vaccine plus effective alternatives to the standard 6 months of isoniazid for latency prophylaxis by 2025 are estimated to reduce new cases of TB by an average of 17% per year. That circumstance would mean the end of TB by 2035, Dr. Pozniak declared.

The trial was funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership. Dr. Merle reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – The good news about non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the setting of HIV infection is that the risk drops dramatically after several years of antiretroviral therapy. The bad news? The risk still remains extraordinarily high, compared with the risk seen in the general population, Mathias Egger, MD, reported at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

That was a key finding in a new analysis of lymphoma trends in more than 210,000 HIV-positive adults on combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) during more than 1.1 million person-years of follow-up in North America, Europe, Latin America, and South Africa.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

The non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) incidence rate standardized to 40 years of age was 287 cases per 100,000 person-years. From a pre-ART baseline of about 500 cases per 100,000 person-years, it dropped “massively” within a year after going on ART. Even after 5 years of ART, however, the rate remained in the range of 60-200 cases per 100,000 person-years, depending upon geographic location and HIV transmission route. In contrast, the incidence rate among the general population of the U.S. and Canada, which is among the world’s highest, is less than 10 per 100,000 person-years, according to Dr. Egger, professor of epidemiology and public health at the University of Bern, Switzerland.

The risk of developing NHL in the setting of HIV infection varied by continent. It was slightly higher in HIV-infected patients in North America than in Europe or South Africa, although the South African data are considered unreliable due to underascertainment of cancers.

In Latin American HIV-infected adults the NHL rate was lowest of all, fully 54% lower than in Europe after adjustment for current CD4 cell count, ART regimen and duration, and transmission risk group. The low NHL rate in Latin America was driven by a very low risk in HIV-infected women.

Across the world, NHL rates in patients on ART were consistently lowest in women, intermediate in heterosexual men, and highest in men who have sex with men.

The explanation for the regional variation in NHL trends might plausibly involve differing prevalences of Epstein-Barr virus–2 and other oncogenic viruses as well as differences in the completeness of cancer ascertainment, Dr. Egger said.

While NHL is categorized as an AIDS-defining condition, Hodgkin lymphoma is not. Nonetheless, the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma is markedly increased in the setting of HIV infection. In one classic meta-analysis, it was increased by 11-fold, compared with that seen in the general population (Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):59-67).

In a study of more than 41,000 HIV-infected European adults by Dr. Egger and his coworkers, the incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma was 49 cases per 100,000 person-years. Importantly, unlike in NHL, the cumulative incidence and mortality of Hodgkin lymphoma were unaffected by ART (Blood. 2011 Jun 9;117(23):6100-8).

The clinical implication of these trends in HIV-related lymphomas is clear: with more than 2 million new cases of HIV infection occurring annually worldwide, and with infected patients living far longer as ART transforms HIV infection into a chronic manageable condition, physicians can anticipate encountering a steadily growing number of patients with NHL and Hodgkin lymphoma, he said.

The NHL study was funded by the European Union and the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The analysis utilized data collected by the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiology and Research Europe (COHERE) and the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA). Dr. Egger reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – The good news about non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the setting of HIV infection is that the risk drops dramatically after several years of antiretroviral therapy. The bad news? The risk still remains extraordinarily high, compared with the risk seen in the general population, Mathias Egger, MD, reported at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

That was a key finding in a new analysis of lymphoma trends in more than 210,000 HIV-positive adults on combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) during more than 1.1 million person-years of follow-up in North America, Europe, Latin America, and South Africa.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

The non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) incidence rate standardized to 40 years of age was 287 cases per 100,000 person-years. From a pre-ART baseline of about 500 cases per 100,000 person-years, it dropped “massively” within a year after going on ART. Even after 5 years of ART, however, the rate remained in the range of 60-200 cases per 100,000 person-years, depending upon geographic location and HIV transmission route. In contrast, the incidence rate among the general population of the U.S. and Canada, which is among the world’s highest, is less than 10 per 100,000 person-years, according to Dr. Egger, professor of epidemiology and public health at the University of Bern, Switzerland.

The risk of developing NHL in the setting of HIV infection varied by continent. It was slightly higher in HIV-infected patients in North America than in Europe or South Africa, although the South African data are considered unreliable due to underascertainment of cancers.

In Latin American HIV-infected adults the NHL rate was lowest of all, fully 54% lower than in Europe after adjustment for current CD4 cell count, ART regimen and duration, and transmission risk group. The low NHL rate in Latin America was driven by a very low risk in HIV-infected women.

Across the world, NHL rates in patients on ART were consistently lowest in women, intermediate in heterosexual men, and highest in men who have sex with men.

The explanation for the regional variation in NHL trends might plausibly involve differing prevalences of Epstein-Barr virus–2 and other oncogenic viruses as well as differences in the completeness of cancer ascertainment, Dr. Egger said.

While NHL is categorized as an AIDS-defining condition, Hodgkin lymphoma is not. Nonetheless, the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma is markedly increased in the setting of HIV infection. In one classic meta-analysis, it was increased by 11-fold, compared with that seen in the general population (Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):59-67).

In a study of more than 41,000 HIV-infected European adults by Dr. Egger and his coworkers, the incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma was 49 cases per 100,000 person-years. Importantly, unlike in NHL, the cumulative incidence and mortality of Hodgkin lymphoma were unaffected by ART (Blood. 2011 Jun 9;117(23):6100-8).

The clinical implication of these trends in HIV-related lymphomas is clear: with more than 2 million new cases of HIV infection occurring annually worldwide, and with infected patients living far longer as ART transforms HIV infection into a chronic manageable condition, physicians can anticipate encountering a steadily growing number of patients with NHL and Hodgkin lymphoma, he said.

The NHL study was funded by the European Union and the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The analysis utilized data collected by the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiology and Research Europe (COHERE) and the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA). Dr. Egger reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – The good news about non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the setting of HIV infection is that the risk drops dramatically after several years of antiretroviral therapy. The bad news? The risk still remains extraordinarily high, compared with the risk seen in the general population, Mathias Egger, MD, reported at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

That was a key finding in a new analysis of lymphoma trends in more than 210,000 HIV-positive adults on combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) during more than 1.1 million person-years of follow-up in North America, Europe, Latin America, and South Africa.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

The non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) incidence rate standardized to 40 years of age was 287 cases per 100,000 person-years. From a pre-ART baseline of about 500 cases per 100,000 person-years, it dropped “massively” within a year after going on ART. Even after 5 years of ART, however, the rate remained in the range of 60-200 cases per 100,000 person-years, depending upon geographic location and HIV transmission route. In contrast, the incidence rate among the general population of the U.S. and Canada, which is among the world’s highest, is less than 10 per 100,000 person-years, according to Dr. Egger, professor of epidemiology and public health at the University of Bern, Switzerland.

The risk of developing NHL in the setting of HIV infection varied by continent. It was slightly higher in HIV-infected patients in North America than in Europe or South Africa, although the South African data are considered unreliable due to underascertainment of cancers.

In Latin American HIV-infected adults the NHL rate was lowest of all, fully 54% lower than in Europe after adjustment for current CD4 cell count, ART regimen and duration, and transmission risk group. The low NHL rate in Latin America was driven by a very low risk in HIV-infected women.

Across the world, NHL rates in patients on ART were consistently lowest in women, intermediate in heterosexual men, and highest in men who have sex with men.

The explanation for the regional variation in NHL trends might plausibly involve differing prevalences of Epstein-Barr virus–2 and other oncogenic viruses as well as differences in the completeness of cancer ascertainment, Dr. Egger said.

While NHL is categorized as an AIDS-defining condition, Hodgkin lymphoma is not. Nonetheless, the risk of Hodgkin lymphoma is markedly increased in the setting of HIV infection. In one classic meta-analysis, it was increased by 11-fold, compared with that seen in the general population (Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):59-67).

In a study of more than 41,000 HIV-infected European adults by Dr. Egger and his coworkers, the incidence of Hodgkin lymphoma was 49 cases per 100,000 person-years. Importantly, unlike in NHL, the cumulative incidence and mortality of Hodgkin lymphoma were unaffected by ART (Blood. 2011 Jun 9;117(23):6100-8).

The clinical implication of these trends in HIV-related lymphomas is clear: with more than 2 million new cases of HIV infection occurring annually worldwide, and with infected patients living far longer as ART transforms HIV infection into a chronic manageable condition, physicians can anticipate encountering a steadily growing number of patients with NHL and Hodgkin lymphoma, he said.

The NHL study was funded by the European Union and the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The analysis utilized data collected by the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiology and Research Europe (COHERE) and the International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA). Dr. Egger reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – The optimal frequency of kidney safety monitoring in patients using oral daily tenofovir/emtricitabine for pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection is every 6 months, but less frequent monitoring may be reasonable in most low-risk patients, Renee Heffron, PhD, said at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

The occurrence and pattern of detection of a drop in creatinine clearance to less than 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy didn’t differ significantly regardless of whether monitoring was done at 3- or 6-month intervals. The risk of a clinically relevant decline in creatinine clearance during the first 12 months of therapy appears to be largely confined to the subgroup of patients on tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) who weigh 55 kg or less, have a baseline creatinine clearance rate of 60-90 mL/min, or are at least 45 years old, according to Dr. Heffron of the University of Washington, Seattle.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

The question of how frequently to monitor renal function is a key issue as PrEP with tenofovir/emtricitabine is ramped up to scale in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the developing world where the majority of new HIV infections occur – and where laboratory resources are often limited. The randomized clinical trials that led to marketing approval of tenofovir/emtricitabine for PrEP in the United States and elsewhere monitored creatinine clearance every 3 months. But the confirmatory demonstration projects used a range of kidney monitoring schedules, she explained.

She presented an analysis of clinically relevant kidney toxicity in 4,404 initially HIV-negative subjects on tenofovir/emtricitabine in the Partners PrEP Study, in which creatinine clearance was measured every 3 months, and in 955 participants in the Partners Demonstration Study, in which monitoring was performed every 6 months. All participants were at high risk for HIV acquisition because they were members of serodiscordant couples.

The occurrence and pattern of detection of a drop in creatinine clearance to less than 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy didn’t differ significantly regardless of whether monitoring was done at 3- or 6-month intervals. The cumulative rate in the randomized trial was 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.7% at 3, 6, and 12 months, and it was 0.2% at both 6 and 12 months in the demonstration project, Dr. Heffron reported.

These renal events were not only rare, they were reassuringly nonprogressive and resolved within a few weeks of PrEP discontinuation, she added.

Her analysis of the combined 5,359 subjects in the two Partners studies identified three independent predictors of a fall in creatinine clearance to below 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy. A baseline age of 45 years or more was associated with an adjusted 2.5-fold increase, compared with younger patients. Subjects with a creatinine clearance of 60-90 mL/min at enrollment were 74 times more likely to experience a significant drop in creatinine clearance than those who started on PrEP with a creatinine clearance rate in excess of 90 mL/min. And patients weighing 55 kg or less had a 2.7-fold greater risk than those weighing more. But fewer than 5% of patients with any of these three predictors actually experienced a drop in creatinine clearance to below 60 mL/min.

The data from the two Partners studies support guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommending creatinine monitoring every 6 months for people on oral daily PrEP. Still, patients with one of the defined risk factors might logically be candidates for targeted monitoring, Dr. Heffron observed.

The Partners studies were funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Dr. Heffron reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – The optimal frequency of kidney safety monitoring in patients using oral daily tenofovir/emtricitabine for pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection is every 6 months, but less frequent monitoring may be reasonable in most low-risk patients, Renee Heffron, PhD, said at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

The occurrence and pattern of detection of a drop in creatinine clearance to less than 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy didn’t differ significantly regardless of whether monitoring was done at 3- or 6-month intervals. The risk of a clinically relevant decline in creatinine clearance during the first 12 months of therapy appears to be largely confined to the subgroup of patients on tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) who weigh 55 kg or less, have a baseline creatinine clearance rate of 60-90 mL/min, or are at least 45 years old, according to Dr. Heffron of the University of Washington, Seattle.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

The question of how frequently to monitor renal function is a key issue as PrEP with tenofovir/emtricitabine is ramped up to scale in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the developing world where the majority of new HIV infections occur – and where laboratory resources are often limited. The randomized clinical trials that led to marketing approval of tenofovir/emtricitabine for PrEP in the United States and elsewhere monitored creatinine clearance every 3 months. But the confirmatory demonstration projects used a range of kidney monitoring schedules, she explained.

She presented an analysis of clinically relevant kidney toxicity in 4,404 initially HIV-negative subjects on tenofovir/emtricitabine in the Partners PrEP Study, in which creatinine clearance was measured every 3 months, and in 955 participants in the Partners Demonstration Study, in which monitoring was performed every 6 months. All participants were at high risk for HIV acquisition because they were members of serodiscordant couples.

The occurrence and pattern of detection of a drop in creatinine clearance to less than 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy didn’t differ significantly regardless of whether monitoring was done at 3- or 6-month intervals. The cumulative rate in the randomized trial was 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.7% at 3, 6, and 12 months, and it was 0.2% at both 6 and 12 months in the demonstration project, Dr. Heffron reported.

These renal events were not only rare, they were reassuringly nonprogressive and resolved within a few weeks of PrEP discontinuation, she added.

Her analysis of the combined 5,359 subjects in the two Partners studies identified three independent predictors of a fall in creatinine clearance to below 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy. A baseline age of 45 years or more was associated with an adjusted 2.5-fold increase, compared with younger patients. Subjects with a creatinine clearance of 60-90 mL/min at enrollment were 74 times more likely to experience a significant drop in creatinine clearance than those who started on PrEP with a creatinine clearance rate in excess of 90 mL/min. And patients weighing 55 kg or less had a 2.7-fold greater risk than those weighing more. But fewer than 5% of patients with any of these three predictors actually experienced a drop in creatinine clearance to below 60 mL/min.

The data from the two Partners studies support guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommending creatinine monitoring every 6 months for people on oral daily PrEP. Still, patients with one of the defined risk factors might logically be candidates for targeted monitoring, Dr. Heffron observed.

The Partners studies were funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Dr. Heffron reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – The optimal frequency of kidney safety monitoring in patients using oral daily tenofovir/emtricitabine for pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection is every 6 months, but less frequent monitoring may be reasonable in most low-risk patients, Renee Heffron, PhD, said at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

The occurrence and pattern of detection of a drop in creatinine clearance to less than 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy didn’t differ significantly regardless of whether monitoring was done at 3- or 6-month intervals. The risk of a clinically relevant decline in creatinine clearance during the first 12 months of therapy appears to be largely confined to the subgroup of patients on tenofovir/emtricitabine (Truvada) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) who weigh 55 kg or less, have a baseline creatinine clearance rate of 60-90 mL/min, or are at least 45 years old, according to Dr. Heffron of the University of Washington, Seattle.

Bruce Jancin/Frontline Medical News

The question of how frequently to monitor renal function is a key issue as PrEP with tenofovir/emtricitabine is ramped up to scale in sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the developing world where the majority of new HIV infections occur – and where laboratory resources are often limited. The randomized clinical trials that led to marketing approval of tenofovir/emtricitabine for PrEP in the United States and elsewhere monitored creatinine clearance every 3 months. But the confirmatory demonstration projects used a range of kidney monitoring schedules, she explained.

She presented an analysis of clinically relevant kidney toxicity in 4,404 initially HIV-negative subjects on tenofovir/emtricitabine in the Partners PrEP Study, in which creatinine clearance was measured every 3 months, and in 955 participants in the Partners Demonstration Study, in which monitoring was performed every 6 months. All participants were at high risk for HIV acquisition because they were members of serodiscordant couples.

The occurrence and pattern of detection of a drop in creatinine clearance to less than 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy didn’t differ significantly regardless of whether monitoring was done at 3- or 6-month intervals. The cumulative rate in the randomized trial was 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.7% at 3, 6, and 12 months, and it was 0.2% at both 6 and 12 months in the demonstration project, Dr. Heffron reported.

These renal events were not only rare, they were reassuringly nonprogressive and resolved within a few weeks of PrEP discontinuation, she added.

Her analysis of the combined 5,359 subjects in the two Partners studies identified three independent predictors of a fall in creatinine clearance to below 60 mL/min during the first 12 months of therapy. A baseline age of 45 years or more was associated with an adjusted 2.5-fold increase, compared with younger patients. Subjects with a creatinine clearance of 60-90 mL/min at enrollment were 74 times more likely to experience a significant drop in creatinine clearance than those who started on PrEP with a creatinine clearance rate in excess of 90 mL/min. And patients weighing 55 kg or less had a 2.7-fold greater risk than those weighing more. But fewer than 5% of patients with any of these three predictors actually experienced a drop in creatinine clearance to below 60 mL/min.

The data from the two Partners studies support guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommending creatinine monitoring every 6 months for people on oral daily PrEP. Still, patients with one of the defined risk factors might logically be candidates for targeted monitoring, Dr. Heffron observed.

The Partners studies were funded by the National Institutes of Health, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. Dr. Heffron reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

Clinicians should treat patients diagnosed with HIV and tuberculosis for both conditions immediately, according to new guidelines on the treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis.

The clinical practice guidelines were issued collectively by three organizations: the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and published online in Clinical Infectious Diseases.

CDC/James Archer

The guidelines recommend starting TB treatment for all patients as soon as an infection is suspected, rather than waiting for test results, and focusing on daily therapy to reduce the risk of relapse. In addition, all TB patients should receive comprehensive care, including direct observed therapy (DOT) when appropriate (Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw376).

“Treatment of tuberculosis is focused on both curing the individual patient and minimizing the transmission,” wrote Payam Nahid, MD, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues on the guidelines committee.

The guidelines’ section on treatment of tuberculosis in special situations addresses management of TB in patients with conditions including HIV, extrapulmonary TB, culture-negative pulmonary TB, pregnancy, renal disease, and hepatic disease, as well as treatment of children and the elderly.

With regard to HIV, the guidelines recommend the standard 6-month daily TB treatment for HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy. This treatment includes 2 months of isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), and ethambutol (EMB), followed by a continuation phase of 4 months of INH and RIF.

“Patients with HIV infection and tuberculosis are at an increased risk of developing paradoxical worsening of symptoms, signs, or clinical manifestations of tuberculosis after beginning antituberculosis and antiretroviral treatments,” according to the guidelines. These responses are defined as Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS). However, IRIS does not appear to impact the simultaneous treatment of TB and HIV, and the condition can be managed symptomatically if it occurs, the researchers noted.

The guidelines identified several areas in need of further study, including new TB drugs and treatment plans; the effects of biomarkers to help design individual therapy; TB in special populations including HIV patients, pregnant women, and children; and treatment delivery strategies.

The guidelines also are endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the U.S. National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NCTA).

The American Thoracic Society, the Infections Diseases Society of America, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided financial support. Lead author Dr. Nahid had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Clinicians should treat patients diagnosed with HIV and tuberculosis for both conditions immediately, according to new guidelines on the treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis.

The clinical practice guidelines were issued collectively by three organizations: the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and published online in Clinical Infectious Diseases.

CDC/James Archer

The guidelines recommend starting TB treatment for all patients as soon as an infection is suspected, rather than waiting for test results, and focusing on daily therapy to reduce the risk of relapse. In addition, all TB patients should receive comprehensive care, including direct observed therapy (DOT) when appropriate (Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw376).

“Treatment of tuberculosis is focused on both curing the individual patient and minimizing the transmission,” wrote Payam Nahid, MD, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues on the guidelines committee.

The guidelines’ section on treatment of tuberculosis in special situations addresses management of TB in patients with conditions including HIV, extrapulmonary TB, culture-negative pulmonary TB, pregnancy, renal disease, and hepatic disease, as well as treatment of children and the elderly.

With regard to HIV, the guidelines recommend the standard 6-month daily TB treatment for HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy. This treatment includes 2 months of isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), and ethambutol (EMB), followed by a continuation phase of 4 months of INH and RIF.

“Patients with HIV infection and tuberculosis are at an increased risk of developing paradoxical worsening of symptoms, signs, or clinical manifestations of tuberculosis after beginning antituberculosis and antiretroviral treatments,” according to the guidelines. These responses are defined as Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS). However, IRIS does not appear to impact the simultaneous treatment of TB and HIV, and the condition can be managed symptomatically if it occurs, the researchers noted.

The guidelines identified several areas in need of further study, including new TB drugs and treatment plans; the effects of biomarkers to help design individual therapy; TB in special populations including HIV patients, pregnant women, and children; and treatment delivery strategies.

The guidelines also are endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the U.S. National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NCTA).

The American Thoracic Society, the Infections Diseases Society of America, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided financial support. Lead author Dr. Nahid had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Clinicians should treat patients diagnosed with HIV and tuberculosis for both conditions immediately, according to new guidelines on the treatment of drug-susceptible tuberculosis.

The clinical practice guidelines were issued collectively by three organizations: the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), and published online in Clinical Infectious Diseases.

CDC/James Archer

The guidelines recommend starting TB treatment for all patients as soon as an infection is suspected, rather than waiting for test results, and focusing on daily therapy to reduce the risk of relapse. In addition, all TB patients should receive comprehensive care, including direct observed therapy (DOT) when appropriate (Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 10. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw376).

“Treatment of tuberculosis is focused on both curing the individual patient and minimizing the transmission,” wrote Payam Nahid, MD, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues on the guidelines committee.

The guidelines’ section on treatment of tuberculosis in special situations addresses management of TB in patients with conditions including HIV, extrapulmonary TB, culture-negative pulmonary TB, pregnancy, renal disease, and hepatic disease, as well as treatment of children and the elderly.

With regard to HIV, the guidelines recommend the standard 6-month daily TB treatment for HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy. This treatment includes 2 months of isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), and ethambutol (EMB), followed by a continuation phase of 4 months of INH and RIF.

“Patients with HIV infection and tuberculosis are at an increased risk of developing paradoxical worsening of symptoms, signs, or clinical manifestations of tuberculosis after beginning antituberculosis and antiretroviral treatments,” according to the guidelines. These responses are defined as Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS). However, IRIS does not appear to impact the simultaneous treatment of TB and HIV, and the condition can be managed symptomatically if it occurs, the researchers noted.

The guidelines identified several areas in need of further study, including new TB drugs and treatment plans; the effects of biomarkers to help design individual therapy; TB in special populations including HIV patients, pregnant women, and children; and treatment delivery strategies.

The guidelines also are endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the U.S. National Tuberculosis Controllers Association (NCTA).

The American Thoracic Society, the Infections Diseases Society of America, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provided financial support. Lead author Dr. Nahid had no financial conflicts to disclose.

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – Cytomegalovirus viremia is common among patients hospitalized for HIV-associated tuberculosis, but it appears to be a bystander rather than a contributor to the high mortality seen in this population, Amy Ward, MD, said at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

“CMV [cytomegalovirus] viremia is likely a marker of more severe immunodeficiency rather than a direct contributor to mortality,” she concluded based upon the findings of her prospective cohort study. The finding means therapies for CMV viremia will not open up a new avenue of potentially life-saving treatments for these patients.

Courtesy CDC/ Dr. Haraszti

In other severe immunodeficiency conditions, such as after organ transplant, CMV viremia is directly related to increased mortality, and ganciclovir therapy can prevent progression to clinical disease and death, explained Dr. Ward of the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

She presented a prospective cohort study of 256 HIV-infected South African adults, median age 36 years, who were hospitalized with a new diagnosis of TB. At enrollment, their median CD4 count was 64 cells/mm³. Only 35% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART); 44% had previously been on ART, 21% were ART-naive, and 41% had a positive TB blood culture.

CMV viremia was present in 31%, and CMV viral load was 1,000 copies/mL or more in half of them. None had CMV retinitis, based on panoptic fundoscopy at enrollment. HIV-related retinal pathologies at enrollment included disseminated cryptococcal disease, ocular TB granules, and HIV retinitis.

The primary endpoint of the study was mortality at 12 weeks on anti-TB therapy. The mortality rate was 38% in the CMV viremic group, significantly higher than the 17.8% mortality rate seen in the CMV-negative patients.

In a univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CMV viremia was associated with a 2.1-fold increased risk for 12-week mortality. But advancing age, a low CD4 count, and decreasing serum albumin were also risk factors.

When these variables were incorporated in a multivariate regression analysis along with HIV viral load, tuberculosis blood culture results, and gender, CMV viremia was no longer a significant risk factor for 12-week mortality. Age was the sole significant predictor of death. Patients who were at least 36 years old had a 32.8% mortality rate, compared with a 14.1% rate in those who were younger. The CD4 count didn’t differ significantly by age; however, the prevalence of CMV viremia was 38% in the older group and 26.3% in patients under age 36.

“Those patients who were 36 years old and above had a higher mortality and were more likely to have CMV viremia, both findings perhaps reflecting premature aging of the immune system,” Dr. Ward said.

Also, no dose-response was seen between CMV viral load and mortality risk. The 12-week mortality rate was 33.3% in patients with a CMV viral load below 1,000 copies/mL and similar at 34.1% in those with a viral load above that cutpoint, she noted.

The study was funded by the Wellcome Trust and the South African Medical Research Council. Dr. Ward reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – Cytomegalovirus viremia is common among patients hospitalized for HIV-associated tuberculosis, but it appears to be a bystander rather than a contributor to the high mortality seen in this population, Amy Ward, MD, said at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

“CMV [cytomegalovirus] viremia is likely a marker of more severe immunodeficiency rather than a direct contributor to mortality,” she concluded based upon the findings of her prospective cohort study. The finding means therapies for CMV viremia will not open up a new avenue of potentially life-saving treatments for these patients.

Courtesy CDC/ Dr. Haraszti

In other severe immunodeficiency conditions, such as after organ transplant, CMV viremia is directly related to increased mortality, and ganciclovir therapy can prevent progression to clinical disease and death, explained Dr. Ward of the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

She presented a prospective cohort study of 256 HIV-infected South African adults, median age 36 years, who were hospitalized with a new diagnosis of TB. At enrollment, their median CD4 count was 64 cells/mm³. Only 35% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART); 44% had previously been on ART, 21% were ART-naive, and 41% had a positive TB blood culture.

CMV viremia was present in 31%, and CMV viral load was 1,000 copies/mL or more in half of them. None had CMV retinitis, based on panoptic fundoscopy at enrollment. HIV-related retinal pathologies at enrollment included disseminated cryptococcal disease, ocular TB granules, and HIV retinitis.

The primary endpoint of the study was mortality at 12 weeks on anti-TB therapy. The mortality rate was 38% in the CMV viremic group, significantly higher than the 17.8% mortality rate seen in the CMV-negative patients.

In a univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CMV viremia was associated with a 2.1-fold increased risk for 12-week mortality. But advancing age, a low CD4 count, and decreasing serum albumin were also risk factors.

When these variables were incorporated in a multivariate regression analysis along with HIV viral load, tuberculosis blood culture results, and gender, CMV viremia was no longer a significant risk factor for 12-week mortality. Age was the sole significant predictor of death. Patients who were at least 36 years old had a 32.8% mortality rate, compared with a 14.1% rate in those who were younger. The CD4 count didn’t differ significantly by age; however, the prevalence of CMV viremia was 38% in the older group and 26.3% in patients under age 36.

“Those patients who were 36 years old and above had a higher mortality and were more likely to have CMV viremia, both findings perhaps reflecting premature aging of the immune system,” Dr. Ward said.

Also, no dose-response was seen between CMV viral load and mortality risk. The 12-week mortality rate was 33.3% in patients with a CMV viral load below 1,000 copies/mL and similar at 34.1% in those with a viral load above that cutpoint, she noted.

The study was funded by the Wellcome Trust and the South African Medical Research Council. Dr. Ward reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

DURBAN, SOUTH AFRICA – Cytomegalovirus viremia is common among patients hospitalized for HIV-associated tuberculosis, but it appears to be a bystander rather than a contributor to the high mortality seen in this population, Amy Ward, MD, said at the 21st International AIDS Conference.

“CMV [cytomegalovirus] viremia is likely a marker of more severe immunodeficiency rather than a direct contributor to mortality,” she concluded based upon the findings of her prospective cohort study. The finding means therapies for CMV viremia will not open up a new avenue of potentially life-saving treatments for these patients.

Courtesy CDC/ Dr. Haraszti

In other severe immunodeficiency conditions, such as after organ transplant, CMV viremia is directly related to increased mortality, and ganciclovir therapy can prevent progression to clinical disease and death, explained Dr. Ward of the University of Cape Town, South Africa.

She presented a prospective cohort study of 256 HIV-infected South African adults, median age 36 years, who were hospitalized with a new diagnosis of TB. At enrollment, their median CD4 count was 64 cells/mm³. Only 35% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART); 44% had previously been on ART, 21% were ART-naive, and 41% had a positive TB blood culture.

CMV viremia was present in 31%, and CMV viral load was 1,000 copies/mL or more in half of them. None had CMV retinitis, based on panoptic fundoscopy at enrollment. HIV-related retinal pathologies at enrollment included disseminated cryptococcal disease, ocular TB granules, and HIV retinitis.

The primary endpoint of the study was mortality at 12 weeks on anti-TB therapy. The mortality rate was 38% in the CMV viremic group, significantly higher than the 17.8% mortality rate seen in the CMV-negative patients.

In a univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, CMV viremia was associated with a 2.1-fold increased risk for 12-week mortality. But advancing age, a low CD4 count, and decreasing serum albumin were also risk factors.

When these variables were incorporated in a multivariate regression analysis along with HIV viral load, tuberculosis blood culture results, and gender, CMV viremia was no longer a significant risk factor for 12-week mortality. Age was the sole significant predictor of death. Patients who were at least 36 years old had a 32.8% mortality rate, compared with a 14.1% rate in those who were younger. The CD4 count didn’t differ significantly by age; however, the prevalence of CMV viremia was 38% in the older group and 26.3% in patients under age 36.

“Those patients who were 36 years old and above had a higher mortality and were more likely to have CMV viremia, both findings perhaps reflecting premature aging of the immune system,” Dr. Ward said.

Also, no dose-response was seen between CMV viral load and mortality risk. The 12-week mortality rate was 33.3% in patients with a CMV viral load below 1,000 copies/mL and similar at 34.1% in those with a viral load above that cutpoint, she noted.

The study was funded by the Wellcome Trust and the South African Medical Research Council. Dr. Ward reported having no financial conflicts of interest.

[email protected]

Cancer patient

receiving treatment

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A new study suggests that higher healthcare spending is not associated with better cancer outcomes in the US, but state-level wealth is.

Researchers found that higher gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was associated with lower mortality for all cancers, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer.

However, higher healthcare spending was only associated with lower mortality for breast cancer—not colorectal cancer or all cancers combined.

Jad Chahoud, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues reported these findings in JNCCN.

To investigate the implications of socioeconomic status and health expenditures on cancer outcomes, the researchers conducted an ecological study at the state level for 3 distinct patient populations: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and all-cancer patients.

The team extracted data on GDP and healthcare spending per capita from the 2009 Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, respectively.

Using data from the National Cancer Institute, the researchers retrieved breast, colorectal, and all-cancer age-adjusted rates and computed mortality/incidence (M/I) ratios for each population.

The team found that higher GDP per capita was significantly associated with lower M/I ratios for all cancers (rho=–0.4406; P=0.0017), breast cancer (rho=–0.3605; P=0.0118), and colorectal cancer (rho=–0.3612; P=0.0117).

But higher healthcare spending was only associated with a lower M/I ratio for breast cancer (rho=–0.4237; P=0.0027).

In a related editorial, Melissa A. Simon, MD, of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, and her colleagues pointed out that the data in this study predate the Affordable Care Act. So the results may not reflect the current state of affairs in the US.

The authors also said these data should not be used to guide—or misguide—policy makers to cap or decrease spending for certain health issues.

“Increased spending does not necessarily improve quality of care, but capping or cutting spending on healthcare does not necessarily solve problems either,” the authors wrote.

In a counterpoint editorial, Dr Chahoud and his colleagues said the goal of their study was not to misguide policy makers.

The team doesn’t recommend capping healthcare spending. Rather, they want to see “smart” spending that will have an impact on patient outcomes.

Cancer patient

receiving treatment

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A new study suggests that higher healthcare spending is not associated with better cancer outcomes in the US, but state-level wealth is.

Researchers found that higher gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was associated with lower mortality for all cancers, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer.

However, higher healthcare spending was only associated with lower mortality for breast cancer—not colorectal cancer or all cancers combined.

Jad Chahoud, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues reported these findings in JNCCN.

To investigate the implications of socioeconomic status and health expenditures on cancer outcomes, the researchers conducted an ecological study at the state level for 3 distinct patient populations: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and all-cancer patients.

The team extracted data on GDP and healthcare spending per capita from the 2009 Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, respectively.

Using data from the National Cancer Institute, the researchers retrieved breast, colorectal, and all-cancer age-adjusted rates and computed mortality/incidence (M/I) ratios for each population.

The team found that higher GDP per capita was significantly associated with lower M/I ratios for all cancers (rho=–0.4406; P=0.0017), breast cancer (rho=–0.3605; P=0.0118), and colorectal cancer (rho=–0.3612; P=0.0117).

But higher healthcare spending was only associated with a lower M/I ratio for breast cancer (rho=–0.4237; P=0.0027).

In a related editorial, Melissa A. Simon, MD, of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, and her colleagues pointed out that the data in this study predate the Affordable Care Act. So the results may not reflect the current state of affairs in the US.

The authors also said these data should not be used to guide—or misguide—policy makers to cap or decrease spending for certain health issues.

“Increased spending does not necessarily improve quality of care, but capping or cutting spending on healthcare does not necessarily solve problems either,” the authors wrote.

In a counterpoint editorial, Dr Chahoud and his colleagues said the goal of their study was not to misguide policy makers.

The team doesn’t recommend capping healthcare spending. Rather, they want to see “smart” spending that will have an impact on patient outcomes.

Cancer patient

receiving treatment

Photo by Rhoda Baer

A new study suggests that higher healthcare spending is not associated with better cancer outcomes in the US, but state-level wealth is.

Researchers found that higher gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was associated with lower mortality for all cancers, colorectal cancer, and breast cancer.

However, higher healthcare spending was only associated with lower mortality for breast cancer—not colorectal cancer or all cancers combined.

Jad Chahoud, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and his colleagues reported these findings in JNCCN.

To investigate the implications of socioeconomic status and health expenditures on cancer outcomes, the researchers conducted an ecological study at the state level for 3 distinct patient populations: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and all-cancer patients.

The team extracted data on GDP and healthcare spending per capita from the 2009 Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, respectively.

Using data from the National Cancer Institute, the researchers retrieved breast, colorectal, and all-cancer age-adjusted rates and computed mortality/incidence (M/I) ratios for each population.

The team found that higher GDP per capita was significantly associated with lower M/I ratios for all cancers (rho=–0.4406; P=0.0017), breast cancer (rho=–0.3605; P=0.0118), and colorectal cancer (rho=–0.3612; P=0.0117).

But higher healthcare spending was only associated with a lower M/I ratio for breast cancer (rho=–0.4237; P=0.0027).

In a related editorial, Melissa A. Simon, MD, of Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois, and her colleagues pointed out that the data in this study predate the Affordable Care Act. So the results may not reflect the current state of affairs in the US.

The authors also said these data should not be used to guide—or misguide—policy makers to cap or decrease spending for certain health issues.

“Increased spending does not necessarily improve quality of care, but capping or cutting spending on healthcare does not necessarily solve problems either,” the authors wrote.

In a counterpoint editorial, Dr Chahoud and his colleagues said the goal of their study was not to misguide policy makers.

The team doesn’t recommend capping healthcare spending. Rather, they want to see “smart” spending that will have an impact on patient outcomes.