ORLANDO – There may soon be a new gold standard in acne therapy – gold nanoparticles.

Evidence is mounting that the combination of a laser and a topical suspension of gold- or silver-coated silica nanoparticles can ablate the inner lining of the pilosebaceous unit, dramatically reducing or eliminating acne.

The system is still investigational in the United States, but shows great promise, Gilly Munavalli, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

ORLANDO – There may soon be a new gold standard in acne therapy – gold nanoparticles.

Evidence is mounting that the combination of a laser and a topical suspension of gold- or silver-coated silica nanoparticles can ablate the inner lining of the pilosebaceous unit, dramatically reducing or eliminating acne.

The system is still investigational in the United States, but shows great promise, Gilly Munavalli, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

ORLANDO – There may soon be a new gold standard in acne therapy – gold nanoparticles.

Evidence is mounting that the combination of a laser and a topical suspension of gold- or silver-coated silica nanoparticles can ablate the inner lining of the pilosebaceous unit, dramatically reducing or eliminating acne.

The system is still investigational in the United States, but shows great promise, Gilly Munavalli, MD, said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

ORLANDO – The rule of threes that has been used to identify patients at risk of hereditary melanoma who may be candidates for genetic testing may be modified soon, according to Sancy Leachman, MD, PhD, professor and chair of the department of dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Dr. Leachman was the author of a 2009 study that listed three factors as criteria for identifying melanoma: a personal history of at least three invasive melanomas, a combination of at least three melanomas in the individual and in first-degree and second-degree blood relatives – or, in first- or second-degree relatives, a total of at least three diagnoses of melanoma or pancreatic cancer or astrocytoma, which also have been associated with a known susceptibility gene, p16 (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Oct;61[4]:677.e1-14).

But with more genetic testing, it is becoming clear that there are other cancers associated with an increased risk of hereditary melanoma, she explained in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “The genes are a little bit different, but if you could identify those patients, you could potentially then screen them for those other cancers,” said Dr. Leachman, who is also director of the melanoma research program at Knight Cancer Institute at OHSU.

In the interview, she discussed a soon-to-be-published literature review that builds upon the rule of threes and suggests a strategy for deciding which patients should be considered for genetic testing, and includes “a suggested list of genes” that should be used in these different subsets of patients.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – The rule of threes that has been used to identify patients at risk of hereditary melanoma who may be candidates for genetic testing may be modified soon, according to Sancy Leachman, MD, PhD, professor and chair of the department of dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Dr. Leachman was the author of a 2009 study that listed three factors as criteria for identifying melanoma: a personal history of at least three invasive melanomas, a combination of at least three melanomas in the individual and in first-degree and second-degree blood relatives – or, in first- or second-degree relatives, a total of at least three diagnoses of melanoma or pancreatic cancer or astrocytoma, which also have been associated with a known susceptibility gene, p16 (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Oct;61[4]:677.e1-14).

But with more genetic testing, it is becoming clear that there are other cancers associated with an increased risk of hereditary melanoma, she explained in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “The genes are a little bit different, but if you could identify those patients, you could potentially then screen them for those other cancers,” said Dr. Leachman, who is also director of the melanoma research program at Knight Cancer Institute at OHSU.

In the interview, she discussed a soon-to-be-published literature review that builds upon the rule of threes and suggests a strategy for deciding which patients should be considered for genetic testing, and includes “a suggested list of genes” that should be used in these different subsets of patients.

[email protected]

ORLANDO – The rule of threes that has been used to identify patients at risk of hereditary melanoma who may be candidates for genetic testing may be modified soon, according to Sancy Leachman, MD, PhD, professor and chair of the department of dermatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Dr. Leachman was the author of a 2009 study that listed three factors as criteria for identifying melanoma: a personal history of at least three invasive melanomas, a combination of at least three melanomas in the individual and in first-degree and second-degree blood relatives – or, in first- or second-degree relatives, a total of at least three diagnoses of melanoma or pancreatic cancer or astrocytoma, which also have been associated with a known susceptibility gene, p16 (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Oct;61[4]:677.e1-14).

But with more genetic testing, it is becoming clear that there are other cancers associated with an increased risk of hereditary melanoma, she explained in a video interview at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology. “The genes are a little bit different, but if you could identify those patients, you could potentially then screen them for those other cancers,” said Dr. Leachman, who is also director of the melanoma research program at Knight Cancer Institute at OHSU.

In the interview, she discussed a soon-to-be-published literature review that builds upon the rule of threes and suggests a strategy for deciding which patients should be considered for genetic testing, and includes “a suggested list of genes” that should be used in these different subsets of patients.

[email protected]

Photo courtesy of Amgen

Blinatumomab proved more effective than chemotherapy in a phase 3 trial of adults with Ph-negative, relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

Blinatumomab produced higher remission rates and nearly doubled overall survival (OS) when compared to standard care, which encompassed 4 different chemotherapy regimens (investigator’s choice).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was higher for patients who received chemotherapy, but the incidence of serious AEs was higher in the blinatumomab arm.

These results were published in NEJM. The trial, known as TOWER, was sponsored by Amgen, the company developing blinatumomab.

“Results from the TOWER study reinforce the potential of this single-agent, bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy, which helped a higher percentage of patients achieve minimal residual disease response versus standard of care chemotherapy, highlighting the depth and quality of remissions achieved,” said study author Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Treatment

TOWER enrolled 405 patients with Ph-negative, relapsed/refractory B-ALL, 376 of whom ultimately received treatment.

The patients received blinatumomab (n=267) or investigator’s choice of 1 of 4 protocol-defined standard chemotherapy regimens (n=109):

• FLAG (fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine arabinoside, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor), with or without an anthracycline (n=49, 45%)
• A high-dose cytarabine arabinoside-based regimen (n=19, 17%)
• A high-dose methotrexate-based regimen (n=22, 20%)
• A clofarabine-based regimen (n=19, 17%).

Patients who received blinatumomab received it as a continuous infusion, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off, at 9 µg/day for 7 days, then 28 µg/day on weeks 2-4. They received 2 cycles of induction, which was followed by 3 cycles of consolidation if they had ≤5% blasts.

If patients still had ≤5% blasts after consolidation, they received up to 12 months of blinatumomab maintenance. Maintenance was a continuous infusion, 4 weeks on and 8 weeks off, at 28 µg/day.

Patients in the blinatumomab arm received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1-9). And patients in the chemotherapy arm received a median of 1 cycle (range, 1 to 4).

Thirty-two percent of patients in the blinatumomab arm received consolidation, as did 3% of patients in the chemotherapy arm.

Patients

Patient characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. The mean age was 41 in both arms (range, 18-80). Nearly 60% of patients in both arms were male.

About 40% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 50% in the chemotherapy arm had not received any prior salvage regimens.

Thirty-five percent of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 34% in the chemotherapy arm had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) prior to study enrollment. Seventeen percent and 20%, respectively, relapsed after HSCT.

Forty-two percent and 40%, respectively, were refractory to primary or salvage therapy. Twenty-eight percent of patients in both arms were in their first relapse, and their first remission had lasted less than 12 months. Twelve percent of patients in both arms had an untreated second or greater relapse.

Remission

Within 12 weeks of treatment initiation, complete remission (CR) rates were significantly higher in the blinatumomab arm than the chemotherapy arm. (This was in the intent-to-treat population, which included 271 patients in the blinatumomab arm and 134 patients in the chemotherapy arm.)

The rate of CR with full hematologic recovery was 34% in the blinatumomab arm and 16% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The rate of CR with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery was 44% and 25%, respectively (P<0.001).

Among patients who achieved a CR with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery, 76% of those in the blinatumomab arm and 48% of those in the chemotherapy arm were negative for minimal residual disease.

Survival

At a median follow-up of 11.7 months for the blinatumomab arm and 11.8 months for the chemotherapy arm, the OS was significantly longer in the blinatumomab arm.

The median OS was 7.7 months and 4.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio for death=0.71, P=0.01).

The improvement in OS with blinatumomab was consistent across subgroups, regardless of age, prior salvage therapy, or prior allo-HSCT.

The investigators also considered the effect that post-treatment allo-HSCT might have on OS. Sixty-five patients in the blinatumomab arm and 32 in the chemotherapy arm went on to receive an allo-HSCT (24% of patients in both arms).

When the investigators censored for post-treatment allo-HSCT, the median OS was 6.9 months in the blinatumomab arm and 3.9 months in the chemotherapy arm (hazard ratio=0.66, P=0.004).

Safety

Nearly all patients in both arms (99%) experienced AEs. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 87% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 92% of those in the chemotherapy arm. Serious AEs occurred in 62% and 45%, respectively.

Grade 3 or higher AEs of interest, according to the researchers, were infection (34% with blinatumomab and 52% with chemotherapy), neutropenia (38% and 58%, respectively), elevated liver enzymes (13% and 15%, respectively), neurologic events (9% and 8%, respectively), cytokine release syndrome (5% and 0%, respectively), infusion reactions (3% and 1%, respectively), and lymphopenia (2% and 4%, respectively).

Fatal AEs occurred in 19% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 17% of those in the chemotherapy arm.

Fatal AEs that occurred in at least 1% of patients in either arm (blinatumomab and chemotherapy, respectively) were sepsis (3% and 4%), septic shock (2% and 0%), multiorgan failure (1% and 0%), respiratory failure (<1% and 2%), and bacteremia (0% and 2%). 

Photo courtesy of Amgen

Blinatumomab proved more effective than chemotherapy in a phase 3 trial of adults with Ph-negative, relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

Blinatumomab produced higher remission rates and nearly doubled overall survival (OS) when compared to standard care, which encompassed 4 different chemotherapy regimens (investigator’s choice).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was higher for patients who received chemotherapy, but the incidence of serious AEs was higher in the blinatumomab arm.

These results were published in NEJM. The trial, known as TOWER, was sponsored by Amgen, the company developing blinatumomab.

“Results from the TOWER study reinforce the potential of this single-agent, bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy, which helped a higher percentage of patients achieve minimal residual disease response versus standard of care chemotherapy, highlighting the depth and quality of remissions achieved,” said study author Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Treatment

TOWER enrolled 405 patients with Ph-negative, relapsed/refractory B-ALL, 376 of whom ultimately received treatment.

The patients received blinatumomab (n=267) or investigator’s choice of 1 of 4 protocol-defined standard chemotherapy regimens (n=109):

• FLAG (fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine arabinoside, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor), with or without an anthracycline (n=49, 45%)
• A high-dose cytarabine arabinoside-based regimen (n=19, 17%)
• A high-dose methotrexate-based regimen (n=22, 20%)
• A clofarabine-based regimen (n=19, 17%).

Patients who received blinatumomab received it as a continuous infusion, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off, at 9 µg/day for 7 days, then 28 µg/day on weeks 2-4. They received 2 cycles of induction, which was followed by 3 cycles of consolidation if they had ≤5% blasts.

If patients still had ≤5% blasts after consolidation, they received up to 12 months of blinatumomab maintenance. Maintenance was a continuous infusion, 4 weeks on and 8 weeks off, at 28 µg/day.

Patients in the blinatumomab arm received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1-9). And patients in the chemotherapy arm received a median of 1 cycle (range, 1 to 4).

Thirty-two percent of patients in the blinatumomab arm received consolidation, as did 3% of patients in the chemotherapy arm.

Patients

Patient characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. The mean age was 41 in both arms (range, 18-80). Nearly 60% of patients in both arms were male.

About 40% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 50% in the chemotherapy arm had not received any prior salvage regimens.

Thirty-five percent of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 34% in the chemotherapy arm had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) prior to study enrollment. Seventeen percent and 20%, respectively, relapsed after HSCT.

Forty-two percent and 40%, respectively, were refractory to primary or salvage therapy. Twenty-eight percent of patients in both arms were in their first relapse, and their first remission had lasted less than 12 months. Twelve percent of patients in both arms had an untreated second or greater relapse.

Remission

Within 12 weeks of treatment initiation, complete remission (CR) rates were significantly higher in the blinatumomab arm than the chemotherapy arm. (This was in the intent-to-treat population, which included 271 patients in the blinatumomab arm and 134 patients in the chemotherapy arm.)

The rate of CR with full hematologic recovery was 34% in the blinatumomab arm and 16% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The rate of CR with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery was 44% and 25%, respectively (P<0.001).

Among patients who achieved a CR with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery, 76% of those in the blinatumomab arm and 48% of those in the chemotherapy arm were negative for minimal residual disease.

Survival

At a median follow-up of 11.7 months for the blinatumomab arm and 11.8 months for the chemotherapy arm, the OS was significantly longer in the blinatumomab arm.

The median OS was 7.7 months and 4.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio for death=0.71, P=0.01).

The improvement in OS with blinatumomab was consistent across subgroups, regardless of age, prior salvage therapy, or prior allo-HSCT.

The investigators also considered the effect that post-treatment allo-HSCT might have on OS. Sixty-five patients in the blinatumomab arm and 32 in the chemotherapy arm went on to receive an allo-HSCT (24% of patients in both arms).

When the investigators censored for post-treatment allo-HSCT, the median OS was 6.9 months in the blinatumomab arm and 3.9 months in the chemotherapy arm (hazard ratio=0.66, P=0.004).

Safety

Nearly all patients in both arms (99%) experienced AEs. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 87% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 92% of those in the chemotherapy arm. Serious AEs occurred in 62% and 45%, respectively.

Grade 3 or higher AEs of interest, according to the researchers, were infection (34% with blinatumomab and 52% with chemotherapy), neutropenia (38% and 58%, respectively), elevated liver enzymes (13% and 15%, respectively), neurologic events (9% and 8%, respectively), cytokine release syndrome (5% and 0%, respectively), infusion reactions (3% and 1%, respectively), and lymphopenia (2% and 4%, respectively).

Fatal AEs occurred in 19% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 17% of those in the chemotherapy arm.

Fatal AEs that occurred in at least 1% of patients in either arm (blinatumomab and chemotherapy, respectively) were sepsis (3% and 4%), septic shock (2% and 0%), multiorgan failure (1% and 0%), respiratory failure (<1% and 2%), and bacteremia (0% and 2%). 

Photo courtesy of Amgen

Blinatumomab proved more effective than chemotherapy in a phase 3 trial of adults with Ph-negative, relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

Blinatumomab produced higher remission rates and nearly doubled overall survival (OS) when compared to standard care, which encompassed 4 different chemotherapy regimens (investigator’s choice).

The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) was higher for patients who received chemotherapy, but the incidence of serious AEs was higher in the blinatumomab arm.

These results were published in NEJM. The trial, known as TOWER, was sponsored by Amgen, the company developing blinatumomab.

“Results from the TOWER study reinforce the potential of this single-agent, bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy, which helped a higher percentage of patients achieve minimal residual disease response versus standard of care chemotherapy, highlighting the depth and quality of remissions achieved,” said study author Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.

Treatment

TOWER enrolled 405 patients with Ph-negative, relapsed/refractory B-ALL, 376 of whom ultimately received treatment.

The patients received blinatumomab (n=267) or investigator’s choice of 1 of 4 protocol-defined standard chemotherapy regimens (n=109):

• FLAG (fludarabine, high-dose cytarabine arabinoside, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor), with or without an anthracycline (n=49, 45%)
• A high-dose cytarabine arabinoside-based regimen (n=19, 17%)
• A high-dose methotrexate-based regimen (n=22, 20%)
• A clofarabine-based regimen (n=19, 17%).

Patients who received blinatumomab received it as a continuous infusion, 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off, at 9 µg/day for 7 days, then 28 µg/day on weeks 2-4. They received 2 cycles of induction, which was followed by 3 cycles of consolidation if they had ≤5% blasts.

If patients still had ≤5% blasts after consolidation, they received up to 12 months of blinatumomab maintenance. Maintenance was a continuous infusion, 4 weeks on and 8 weeks off, at 28 µg/day.

Patients in the blinatumomab arm received a median of 2 cycles of therapy (range, 1-9). And patients in the chemotherapy arm received a median of 1 cycle (range, 1 to 4).

Thirty-two percent of patients in the blinatumomab arm received consolidation, as did 3% of patients in the chemotherapy arm.

Patients

Patient characteristics were similar between the treatment arms. The mean age was 41 in both arms (range, 18-80). Nearly 60% of patients in both arms were male.

About 40% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 50% in the chemotherapy arm had not received any prior salvage regimens.

Thirty-five percent of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 34% in the chemotherapy arm had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) prior to study enrollment. Seventeen percent and 20%, respectively, relapsed after HSCT.

Forty-two percent and 40%, respectively, were refractory to primary or salvage therapy. Twenty-eight percent of patients in both arms were in their first relapse, and their first remission had lasted less than 12 months. Twelve percent of patients in both arms had an untreated second or greater relapse.

Remission

Within 12 weeks of treatment initiation, complete remission (CR) rates were significantly higher in the blinatumomab arm than the chemotherapy arm. (This was in the intent-to-treat population, which included 271 patients in the blinatumomab arm and 134 patients in the chemotherapy arm.)

The rate of CR with full hematologic recovery was 34% in the blinatumomab arm and 16% in the chemotherapy arm (P<0.001). The rate of CR with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery was 44% and 25%, respectively (P<0.001).

Among patients who achieved a CR with full, partial, or incomplete hematologic recovery, 76% of those in the blinatumomab arm and 48% of those in the chemotherapy arm were negative for minimal residual disease.

Survival

At a median follow-up of 11.7 months for the blinatumomab arm and 11.8 months for the chemotherapy arm, the OS was significantly longer in the blinatumomab arm.

The median OS was 7.7 months and 4.0 months, respectively (hazard ratio for death=0.71, P=0.01).

The improvement in OS with blinatumomab was consistent across subgroups, regardless of age, prior salvage therapy, or prior allo-HSCT.

The investigators also considered the effect that post-treatment allo-HSCT might have on OS. Sixty-five patients in the blinatumomab arm and 32 in the chemotherapy arm went on to receive an allo-HSCT (24% of patients in both arms).

When the investigators censored for post-treatment allo-HSCT, the median OS was 6.9 months in the blinatumomab arm and 3.9 months in the chemotherapy arm (hazard ratio=0.66, P=0.004).

Safety

Nearly all patients in both arms (99%) experienced AEs. Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 87% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 92% of those in the chemotherapy arm. Serious AEs occurred in 62% and 45%, respectively.

Grade 3 or higher AEs of interest, according to the researchers, were infection (34% with blinatumomab and 52% with chemotherapy), neutropenia (38% and 58%, respectively), elevated liver enzymes (13% and 15%, respectively), neurologic events (9% and 8%, respectively), cytokine release syndrome (5% and 0%, respectively), infusion reactions (3% and 1%, respectively), and lymphopenia (2% and 4%, respectively).

Fatal AEs occurred in 19% of patients in the blinatumomab arm and 17% of those in the chemotherapy arm.

Fatal AEs that occurred in at least 1% of patients in either arm (blinatumomab and chemotherapy, respectively) were sepsis (3% and 4%), septic shock (2% and 0%), multiorgan failure (1% and 0%), respiratory failure (<1% and 2%), and bacteremia (0% and 2%). 

WASHINGTON – A new device may be the best opportunity yet to achieve sustained blood pressure control in individuals aged 60 years and older, according to Paul Sobotka, MD, Chief Scientific Officer at ROX Medical, the maker of the device.

The experimental device is an arteriovenous coupler that provides an anastomosis between artery and vein to lower arterial volume and reduce blood pressure due to a structural cause. The device has already performed well in initial clinical studies, including a controlled, open-label trial, he reported at CRT 2017 sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Washington Hospital Center.

WASHINGTON – A new device may be the best opportunity yet to achieve sustained blood pressure control in individuals aged 60 years and older, according to Paul Sobotka, MD, Chief Scientific Officer at ROX Medical, the maker of the device.

The experimental device is an arteriovenous coupler that provides an anastomosis between artery and vein to lower arterial volume and reduce blood pressure due to a structural cause. The device has already performed well in initial clinical studies, including a controlled, open-label trial, he reported at CRT 2017 sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Washington Hospital Center.

WASHINGTON – A new device may be the best opportunity yet to achieve sustained blood pressure control in individuals aged 60 years and older, according to Paul Sobotka, MD, Chief Scientific Officer at ROX Medical, the maker of the device.

The experimental device is an arteriovenous coupler that provides an anastomosis between artery and vein to lower arterial volume and reduce blood pressure due to a structural cause. The device has already performed well in initial clinical studies, including a controlled, open-label trial, he reported at CRT 2017 sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Washington Hospital Center.

ATLANTA – Clinical factors associated with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis include female sex, nonwhite race, and a higher body mass index, results from a retrospective study suggest.

“Previous research has shown associations between various risk factors and the development of chronic rhinosinusitis,” study author Jason H. Kwah, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. “However, there is minimal data regarding risk factor associations with frequent acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis. This is an important question as much of the morbidity and financial burden of this disease stems from costs and symptoms related to the management of acute exacerbations with antibiotics and steroids. If associations can be identified, the hope would be that modification of some of these risk factors could lead to improved control of the condition.”

ATLANTA – Clinical factors associated with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis include female sex, nonwhite race, and a higher body mass index, results from a retrospective study suggest.

“Previous research has shown associations between various risk factors and the development of chronic rhinosinusitis,” study author Jason H. Kwah, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. “However, there is minimal data regarding risk factor associations with frequent acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis. This is an important question as much of the morbidity and financial burden of this disease stems from costs and symptoms related to the management of acute exacerbations with antibiotics and steroids. If associations can be identified, the hope would be that modification of some of these risk factors could lead to improved control of the condition.”

ATLANTA – Clinical factors associated with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis include female sex, nonwhite race, and a higher body mass index, results from a retrospective study suggest.

“Previous research has shown associations between various risk factors and the development of chronic rhinosinusitis,” study author Jason H. Kwah, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. “However, there is minimal data regarding risk factor associations with frequent acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis. This is an important question as much of the morbidity and financial burden of this disease stems from costs and symptoms related to the management of acute exacerbations with antibiotics and steroids. If associations can be identified, the hope would be that modification of some of these risk factors could lead to improved control of the condition.”

WASHINGTON – The interventional cardiology team at Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa., reorganized their care for ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) in 2004 to improve their door-to-balloon angioplasty times. Their highly successful efforts soon streamlined the process, placing Geisinger in the top 10% nationally for low average door-to-balloon (DTB) times.

Then, Geisinger began to see their DTB times creep up.

After witnessing a 5- to 10-minute increase in DTB times for STEMI patients – whether picked up by ambulance, appearing in the emergency department (ED), or referred from neighboring hospitals – James Blankenship, MD, director of the division of cardiology, and fellow Geisinger researchers took on an institutional analysis, which was presented at CRT 2017 sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Washington Hospital Center.

Their analysis failed to identify a single explanation, but it did reinforce the importance of constantly reinvigorating processes, Dr. Blankenship said. And their analysis indicated that delays don’t necessarily translate into poorer outcomes.

One proposed explanation was that delays had been caused by an increased reliance on radial rather than femoral catheter access. Dr. Blankenship cited studies suggesting that radial access increases DTB times by 1 to 12 minutes. The proportion of percutaneous coronary interventions performed radially at Geisinger had risen from 2% to 85% over the time period that DTB times had risen.

“There is evidence of benefit from radial access, so even if it slows you down a few minutes, it may be worth doing,” Dr. Blankenship noted. However, when this variable was evaluated, the DTB times were, if anything, slightly faster with radial relative to femoral access.

Another theory was that the decision to provide fellows with a greater role in STEMI management had produced treatment delays. In the cath lab at Geisinger, the increased fellow participation “correlated perfectly” with the decline in DTB times, according to Dr. Blankenship. However, a close look at this variable failed to show any meaningful impact on DTB times.

Changes in process were also examined. For one example, a form must now be completed documenting airway assessment. However, Dr. Blankenship found that filling out this form only takes about a minute and could account for only a small part of the observed loss.

The most significant cause for the increased DTB times among STEMI patients presenting in the ED may well have been a 2012 change in the configuration of the hospital. Prior to 2012, the distance from the ED to the cath lab was less than 100 yards and a 1-minute walk. After the change in the configuration, the cath lab was approximately 7 minutes away, a change that “correlated somewhat” to a prolongation in DTB times.

Similarly, regional hospital STEMI referral patterns changed when a hospital in relatively close proximity opened a cath lab. Up until that time, most referrals had been a 5-minute helicopter transfer, according to Dr. Blankenship. Afterwards, some helicopter transfer times rose to 25 minutes.

Yet, no explanation seemed to be more important than simply ensuring that new staff understand and adhere to the processes. Recounting his experience with a “secret shopper” approach in which he called Geisinger posing as a referring physician to report a potential STEMI, he was disappointed to reach a staff member uncertain of the meaning of the term STEMI.

“STEMI systems need a lot of maintenance,” Dr. Blankenship said. He cautioned that staff changes are common and frequent, making it important to continually assess whether all the participants in delivering STEMI care understand their role.

Some published studies challenge the importance of small changes in DTB times as a predictor of STEMI survival, according to Dr. Blankenship, citing one national survey unable to link a reduction in DTB times with a change in in-hospital mortality (N Engl J Med. 2013;369:901-09). However, he has been more convinced by those studies that do show a relationship. He cited one large study that found an 8% loss in the mortality benefit for each 10-minute delay in DTB (Lancet. 2015;385:1114-22).

Rapid DTB times cannot be divorced from quality of care, Dr. Blankenship said. He cited an experience at one center in which an aggressive program for reducing DTB times led to an increase in mortality among false-positive patients. “It is okay to sacrifice time for quality.”

It was at the 2016 CRT meeting that Dr. Blankenship first provided data showing the decline in DTB times at his institution. At that time and prior to the more comprehensive evaluation of the reasons for the delay presented at this year’s meeting, he speculated that it may be just a question of fatigue from sustaining a rapid response posture over several years.

“My original observation, that after a while you just get tired, is probably still true,” he said.

WASHINGTON – The interventional cardiology team at Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa., reorganized their care for ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) in 2004 to improve their door-to-balloon angioplasty times. Their highly successful efforts soon streamlined the process, placing Geisinger in the top 10% nationally for low average door-to-balloon (DTB) times.

Then, Geisinger began to see their DTB times creep up.

After witnessing a 5- to 10-minute increase in DTB times for STEMI patients – whether picked up by ambulance, appearing in the emergency department (ED), or referred from neighboring hospitals – James Blankenship, MD, director of the division of cardiology, and fellow Geisinger researchers took on an institutional analysis, which was presented at CRT 2017 sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Washington Hospital Center.

Their analysis failed to identify a single explanation, but it did reinforce the importance of constantly reinvigorating processes, Dr. Blankenship said. And their analysis indicated that delays don’t necessarily translate into poorer outcomes.

One proposed explanation was that delays had been caused by an increased reliance on radial rather than femoral catheter access. Dr. Blankenship cited studies suggesting that radial access increases DTB times by 1 to 12 minutes. The proportion of percutaneous coronary interventions performed radially at Geisinger had risen from 2% to 85% over the time period that DTB times had risen.

“There is evidence of benefit from radial access, so even if it slows you down a few minutes, it may be worth doing,” Dr. Blankenship noted. However, when this variable was evaluated, the DTB times were, if anything, slightly faster with radial relative to femoral access.

Another theory was that the decision to provide fellows with a greater role in STEMI management had produced treatment delays. In the cath lab at Geisinger, the increased fellow participation “correlated perfectly” with the decline in DTB times, according to Dr. Blankenship. However, a close look at this variable failed to show any meaningful impact on DTB times.

Changes in process were also examined. For one example, a form must now be completed documenting airway assessment. However, Dr. Blankenship found that filling out this form only takes about a minute and could account for only a small part of the observed loss.

The most significant cause for the increased DTB times among STEMI patients presenting in the ED may well have been a 2012 change in the configuration of the hospital. Prior to 2012, the distance from the ED to the cath lab was less than 100 yards and a 1-minute walk. After the change in the configuration, the cath lab was approximately 7 minutes away, a change that “correlated somewhat” to a prolongation in DTB times.

Similarly, regional hospital STEMI referral patterns changed when a hospital in relatively close proximity opened a cath lab. Up until that time, most referrals had been a 5-minute helicopter transfer, according to Dr. Blankenship. Afterwards, some helicopter transfer times rose to 25 minutes.

Yet, no explanation seemed to be more important than simply ensuring that new staff understand and adhere to the processes. Recounting his experience with a “secret shopper” approach in which he called Geisinger posing as a referring physician to report a potential STEMI, he was disappointed to reach a staff member uncertain of the meaning of the term STEMI.

“STEMI systems need a lot of maintenance,” Dr. Blankenship said. He cautioned that staff changes are common and frequent, making it important to continually assess whether all the participants in delivering STEMI care understand their role.

Some published studies challenge the importance of small changes in DTB times as a predictor of STEMI survival, according to Dr. Blankenship, citing one national survey unable to link a reduction in DTB times with a change in in-hospital mortality (N Engl J Med. 2013;369:901-09). However, he has been more convinced by those studies that do show a relationship. He cited one large study that found an 8% loss in the mortality benefit for each 10-minute delay in DTB (Lancet. 2015;385:1114-22).

Rapid DTB times cannot be divorced from quality of care, Dr. Blankenship said. He cited an experience at one center in which an aggressive program for reducing DTB times led to an increase in mortality among false-positive patients. “It is okay to sacrifice time for quality.”

It was at the 2016 CRT meeting that Dr. Blankenship first provided data showing the decline in DTB times at his institution. At that time and prior to the more comprehensive evaluation of the reasons for the delay presented at this year’s meeting, he speculated that it may be just a question of fatigue from sustaining a rapid response posture over several years.

“My original observation, that after a while you just get tired, is probably still true,” he said.

WASHINGTON – The interventional cardiology team at Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pa., reorganized their care for ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) in 2004 to improve their door-to-balloon angioplasty times. Their highly successful efforts soon streamlined the process, placing Geisinger in the top 10% nationally for low average door-to-balloon (DTB) times.

Then, Geisinger began to see their DTB times creep up.

After witnessing a 5- to 10-minute increase in DTB times for STEMI patients – whether picked up by ambulance, appearing in the emergency department (ED), or referred from neighboring hospitals – James Blankenship, MD, director of the division of cardiology, and fellow Geisinger researchers took on an institutional analysis, which was presented at CRT 2017 sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Institute at Washington Hospital Center.

Their analysis failed to identify a single explanation, but it did reinforce the importance of constantly reinvigorating processes, Dr. Blankenship said. And their analysis indicated that delays don’t necessarily translate into poorer outcomes.

One proposed explanation was that delays had been caused by an increased reliance on radial rather than femoral catheter access. Dr. Blankenship cited studies suggesting that radial access increases DTB times by 1 to 12 minutes. The proportion of percutaneous coronary interventions performed radially at Geisinger had risen from 2% to 85% over the time period that DTB times had risen.

“There is evidence of benefit from radial access, so even if it slows you down a few minutes, it may be worth doing,” Dr. Blankenship noted. However, when this variable was evaluated, the DTB times were, if anything, slightly faster with radial relative to femoral access.

Another theory was that the decision to provide fellows with a greater role in STEMI management had produced treatment delays. In the cath lab at Geisinger, the increased fellow participation “correlated perfectly” with the decline in DTB times, according to Dr. Blankenship. However, a close look at this variable failed to show any meaningful impact on DTB times.

Changes in process were also examined. For one example, a form must now be completed documenting airway assessment. However, Dr. Blankenship found that filling out this form only takes about a minute and could account for only a small part of the observed loss.

The most significant cause for the increased DTB times among STEMI patients presenting in the ED may well have been a 2012 change in the configuration of the hospital. Prior to 2012, the distance from the ED to the cath lab was less than 100 yards and a 1-minute walk. After the change in the configuration, the cath lab was approximately 7 minutes away, a change that “correlated somewhat” to a prolongation in DTB times.

Similarly, regional hospital STEMI referral patterns changed when a hospital in relatively close proximity opened a cath lab. Up until that time, most referrals had been a 5-minute helicopter transfer, according to Dr. Blankenship. Afterwards, some helicopter transfer times rose to 25 minutes.

Yet, no explanation seemed to be more important than simply ensuring that new staff understand and adhere to the processes. Recounting his experience with a “secret shopper” approach in which he called Geisinger posing as a referring physician to report a potential STEMI, he was disappointed to reach a staff member uncertain of the meaning of the term STEMI.

“STEMI systems need a lot of maintenance,” Dr. Blankenship said. He cautioned that staff changes are common and frequent, making it important to continually assess whether all the participants in delivering STEMI care understand their role.

Some published studies challenge the importance of small changes in DTB times as a predictor of STEMI survival, according to Dr. Blankenship, citing one national survey unable to link a reduction in DTB times with a change in in-hospital mortality (N Engl J Med. 2013;369:901-09). However, he has been more convinced by those studies that do show a relationship. He cited one large study that found an 8% loss in the mortality benefit for each 10-minute delay in DTB (Lancet. 2015;385:1114-22).

Rapid DTB times cannot be divorced from quality of care, Dr. Blankenship said. He cited an experience at one center in which an aggressive program for reducing DTB times led to an increase in mortality among false-positive patients. “It is okay to sacrifice time for quality.”

It was at the 2016 CRT meeting that Dr. Blankenship first provided data showing the decline in DTB times at his institution. At that time and prior to the more comprehensive evaluation of the reasons for the delay presented at this year’s meeting, he speculated that it may be just a question of fatigue from sustaining a rapid response posture over several years.

“My original observation, that after a while you just get tired, is probably still true,” he said.

Patients with both psoriasis and major depressive disorder face an adjusted 37% greater risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, a new study finds.

The findings don’t definitively prove that depression plays a role in PsA. Still, “physicians managing patients with psoriasis must make efforts to identify and address depression, as this comorbidity may have a downstream impact,” study coauthor Cheryl Barnabe, MD, MSc, said in an interview.

Patients with both psoriasis and major depressive disorder face an adjusted 37% greater risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, a new study finds.

The findings don’t definitively prove that depression plays a role in PsA. Still, “physicians managing patients with psoriasis must make efforts to identify and address depression, as this comorbidity may have a downstream impact,” study coauthor Cheryl Barnabe, MD, MSc, said in an interview.

Patients with both psoriasis and major depressive disorder face an adjusted 37% greater risk of developing psoriatic arthritis (PsA) over a median follow-up of 5.1 years, a new study finds.

The findings don’t definitively prove that depression plays a role in PsA. Still, “physicians managing patients with psoriasis must make efforts to identify and address depression, as this comorbidity may have a downstream impact,” study coauthor Cheryl Barnabe, MD, MSc, said in an interview.

HOUSTON – A novel protocol designed to speed patients with large-vessel occlusion strokes in and out of primary stroke centers and on to centers where they can undergo definitive thrombectomy treatment produced significant improvements in treatment speed and outcomes among 22 Rhode Island patients managed with the full protocol.

Streamlining the path in and out of a primary stroke center is key for delivering mechanical thrombectomy as quickly as possible to patients with an emergent large vessel occlusion, said Ryan A. McTaggart, MD, at the International Stroke Conference sponsored by the American Heart Association. “Door-in door-out time should be the standard metric for all partnerships between primary and comprehensive stroke centers,” said Dr. McTaggart, a neuroradiologist at Rhode Island Hospital in Providence, the state’s only comprehensive stroke center.

Mitchel Zoler/Frontline Medical News

HOUSTON – A novel protocol designed to speed patients with large-vessel occlusion strokes in and out of primary stroke centers and on to centers where they can undergo definitive thrombectomy treatment produced significant improvements in treatment speed and outcomes among 22 Rhode Island patients managed with the full protocol.

Streamlining the path in and out of a primary stroke center is key for delivering mechanical thrombectomy as quickly as possible to patients with an emergent large vessel occlusion, said Ryan A. McTaggart, MD, at the International Stroke Conference sponsored by the American Heart Association. “Door-in door-out time should be the standard metric for all partnerships between primary and comprehensive stroke centers,” said Dr. McTaggart, a neuroradiologist at Rhode Island Hospital in Providence, the state’s only comprehensive stroke center.

Mitchel Zoler/Frontline Medical News

HOUSTON – A novel protocol designed to speed patients with large-vessel occlusion strokes in and out of primary stroke centers and on to centers where they can undergo definitive thrombectomy treatment produced significant improvements in treatment speed and outcomes among 22 Rhode Island patients managed with the full protocol.

Streamlining the path in and out of a primary stroke center is key for delivering mechanical thrombectomy as quickly as possible to patients with an emergent large vessel occlusion, said Ryan A. McTaggart, MD, at the International Stroke Conference sponsored by the American Heart Association. “Door-in door-out time should be the standard metric for all partnerships between primary and comprehensive stroke centers,” said Dr. McTaggart, a neuroradiologist at Rhode Island Hospital in Providence, the state’s only comprehensive stroke center.

Mitchel Zoler/Frontline Medical News

ORLANDO – Store-and-forward teledermatology may be useful for grading patch test results.

Erin Warshaw, MD, and Sara Hylwa, MD, both of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, sought to compare readings of patch test results both in person and via store-and-forward teledermatology. They patch tested patients at the Hennepin County (Minn.) Medical Center with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series; photos were obtained at the 48-hour reading and the final reading (96-160 hours).

Denise Fulton/Frontline Medical News

ORLANDO – Store-and-forward teledermatology may be useful for grading patch test results.

Erin Warshaw, MD, and Sara Hylwa, MD, both of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, sought to compare readings of patch test results both in person and via store-and-forward teledermatology. They patch tested patients at the Hennepin County (Minn.) Medical Center with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series; photos were obtained at the 48-hour reading and the final reading (96-160 hours).

Denise Fulton/Frontline Medical News

ORLANDO – Store-and-forward teledermatology may be useful for grading patch test results.

Erin Warshaw, MD, and Sara Hylwa, MD, both of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, sought to compare readings of patch test results both in person and via store-and-forward teledermatology. They patch tested patients at the Hennepin County (Minn.) Medical Center with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group screening series; photos were obtained at the 48-hour reading and the final reading (96-160 hours).

Denise Fulton/Frontline Medical News

ORLANDO – A 6-week course of doxycycline is an effective alternative to prednisolone for initial treatment of bullous pemphigoid in elderly patients, who may be particularly vulnerable to the potentially serious side effects of steroids.

While not as effective or quick-acting as prednisolone, doxycycline effected a cure in 74% of elderly patients who received it for 6 weeks in the Bullous Pemphigoid Steroids and Tetracyclines (BLISTER) Trial. More importantly, however, patients who took the antibiotic experienced half as many serious adverse events as those who took prednisolone (18% vs. 36%), Karen Harman, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

ORLANDO – A 6-week course of doxycycline is an effective alternative to prednisolone for initial treatment of bullous pemphigoid in elderly patients, who may be particularly vulnerable to the potentially serious side effects of steroids.

While not as effective or quick-acting as prednisolone, doxycycline effected a cure in 74% of elderly patients who received it for 6 weeks in the Bullous Pemphigoid Steroids and Tetracyclines (BLISTER) Trial. More importantly, however, patients who took the antibiotic experienced half as many serious adverse events as those who took prednisolone (18% vs. 36%), Karen Harman, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.

ORLANDO – A 6-week course of doxycycline is an effective alternative to prednisolone for initial treatment of bullous pemphigoid in elderly patients, who may be particularly vulnerable to the potentially serious side effects of steroids.

While not as effective or quick-acting as prednisolone, doxycycline effected a cure in 74% of elderly patients who received it for 6 weeks in the Bullous Pemphigoid Steroids and Tetracyclines (BLISTER) Trial. More importantly, however, patients who took the antibiotic experienced half as many serious adverse events as those who took prednisolone (18% vs. 36%), Karen Harman, MD, said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology.