A “hospital at home” (HaH) program at Atrium Health, a large integrated delivery system in the Southeast, expanded its hospital capacity during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic by providing hospital-level acute care to COVID-19 patients at home, according to a new study in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“Virtual hospital programs have the potential to provide health systems with additional inpatient capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond,” wrote Kranthi Sitammagari, MD, from the Atrium Health Hospitalist Group, Monroe, N.C., and colleagues.

Whereas most previous HaH programs have relied on visiting nurses and physicians, the new study uses telemedicine to connect with patients. Advocate Health Care researchers published the only other study using the telemedicine-powered model in 2015.

The new Atrium Health study evaluated 1,477 patients who received care in the HaH program between March 23 and May 7 of this year after having been diagnosed with COVID-19. The program provided home monitoring and hospital-level care in a home-based virtual observation unit (VOU) and a virtual acute care unit (VACU).

Patients were tested for the virus in Atrium emergency departments, primary care clinics, urgent care centers, and external testing sites. Those who tested positive were invited to be cared for either in the VOU, if they had mild to moderate symptoms, or in the VACU, if they were sick enough to be admitted to the hospital.
 

Patients hop onboard

Nearly all COVID-positive patients tested in these sites agreed to be admitted to the hospital at home, coauthor Stephanie Murphy, DO, medical director of the Atrium Health HaH program, said in an interview.

Patients with moderate symptoms were glad to be monitored at home, she said. When they got to the point where the nurse supervising their care felt they needed escalation to acute care, they were asked whether they wanted to continue to be cared for at home. Most opted to stay home rather than be admitted to the hospital, where their loved ones couldn’t visit them.

Low-acuity patients in the VOU received daily telemonitoring by a nurse to identify disease progression and escalate care as needed. For those who required more care and were admitted to the VACU, a team of paramedics and registered nurses (RNs; mobile clinicians) visited the patient’s home within 24 hours, setting up a hospital bed, other necessary medical equipment, videoconferencing gear, and a remote-monitoring kit that included a blood pressure cuff, a pulse oximeter, and a thermometer.

Dedicated hospitalists and nurses managed patients with 24/7 coverage and monitoring, bringing in other specialties as needed for virtual consults. Mobile clinician and virtual provider visits continued daily until a patient’s condition improved to the point where they could be deescalated back to the VOU. After that, patients received mobile app-driven symptom monitoring and telephone follow-up with a nurse until they got better.
 

Few patients go to hospital

Overall, patients had a median length of stay of 11 days in the VOU or the VACU or both. The vast majority, 1,293 patients (88%), received care in the VOU only. In that cohort, just 40 patients (3%) required hospitalization in an Atrium facility. Sixteen of those patients spent time in an ICU, seven required ventilator support, and two died in the hospital.

A total of 184 patients (12%) were admitted to the VACU. Twenty-one (11%) required intravenous fluids, 16 (9%) received antibiotics, 40 (22%) required inhaler or nebulizer treatments, 41 (22%) used supplemental oxygen, and 24 (13%) were admitted to a conventional hospital. Of the latter patients, 10 were admitted to an ICU, one required a ventilator, and none died in the hospital.

Dr. Sitammagari, a hospitalist and comedical director for quality at Atrium Health, told this news organization that, overall, the outcomes for patients in the system’s HaH were comparable to those seen in the literature among other COVID-19 cohorts.
 

Augmenting hospital capacity

The authors note that treating the 160 VACU patients within the HaH saved hospital beds for other patients. The HaH maintained a consistent census of between 20 and 30 patients for the first 6 weeks as COVID-19 cases spread.

Since last spring, Dr. Murphy said, the Atrium HaH’s daily census has grown to between 30 and 45 patients. “We could absorb 50 patients if our hospitals required it.”

How much capacity does that add to Atrium Health? While there are 50 hospitals in the health system, the HaH was set up mainly to care for COVID-19 patients who would otherwise have been admitted to the 10 acute-care hospitals in the Charlotte, N.C., area. In the 4 weeks ending Nov. 16, these facilities carried an average daily census of around 160 COVID-19 patients, Dr. Murphy noted. “During that time, the Atrium Health HaH has carried, on average, about 20%-25% of that census.”

If the pandemic were to overwhelm area hospitals, she added, “the structure would support flexing up our staffing and supplies to expand to crisis capacity,” which could be up to 200 patients a day.

For the nurses who make most of the phone calls to patients, patients average about 12 to 15 per RN, Dr. Murphy said, and there’s one mobile clinician for every six to nine patients. That’s pretty consistent with the staffing on med-surg floors in hospitals, she said.

The physicians in the program include hospitalists dedicated to telemedicine and some doctors who can’t work in the regular hospital because they’re immunocompromised. The physicians round virtually, covering 12-17 HaH patients per day, according to Dr. Murphy.
 

Prior planning paid off

Unlike some other health care systems that have launched HaH programs with the aid of outside vendors, Atrium Health developed its own HaH and brought it online just 2 weeks after deciding to launch the program. Atrium was able to do this, Dr. Sitammagari explained, because before the pandemic its hospitalist program was already developing an HaH model to improve the care of high-risk patients after hospital discharge to prevent readmission.

While Atrium’s electronic health record system wasn’t designed for hospital at home, its health information technology department and clinicians collaborated in rewriting some of the workflows and order sets in the EHR. For example, they set up a nursing questionnaire to administer after VACU admission, and they created another form for automatic admission to the HaH after a patient tested positive for COVID-19. Atrium staff also modified a patient-doctor communications app to help clinicians monitor HaH patients, Dr. Murphy noted.

Other hospital systems have gotten up to speed on HaH pretty quickly by using platforms supplied by outside vendors. Adventist Health in Los Angeles, for example, started admitting patients to its hospital at home just a month after approaching a vendor called Medically Home.
 

COVID vs. non-COVID patients

Atrium’s decision to focus its HaH effort on COVID-19 patients is unusual among the small but growing number of health systems that have adopted the HaH model to increase their capacity. (Atrium is now transferring some hospitalized patients with other conditions to its HaH, but is still focusing mainly on COVID-19 in its HaH program.)

Bruce Leff, MD, a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, a leading expert on the HaH model, agrees that it can increase hospital capacity significantly.

Dr. Leff praised the Atrium Health study. “It proves that within an integrated delivery system you can quickly deploy and implement a virtual hospital in the specific-use case of COVID, and help patients and help the system at scale,” he said. “They took a bunch of people into the virtual observation unit and thereby kept people from overwhelming their [emergency department] and treated those people safely at home.”

Dr. Leff had no problem with Atrium’s focus on patients with COVID-19 rather than other conditions. “My guess is that they have the ability to take what they developed and apply it to other conditions. Once you have the ability to do acute care at home, you can do a lot at home.”

The biggest barrier to the spread of hospital at home remains the lack of insurer coverage. Dr. Murphy said that health plans are covering virtual physician consultations with patients in the HaH, as well as some other bits and pieces, but not the entire episode of acute care.

Dr. Leff believes that this will start changing soon. COVID-19 has altered the attitudes of physicians and hospitals toward telehealth, he noted, “and it has moved policy makers and payers to start thinking about the new models – home-based care in general and hospital at home in particular. For the first time in 25 years, payers are starting to get interested.”

Most of the authors are employees of Atrium Health. In addition, one coauthor reports being the cofounder of a digital health company, iEnroll, and receiving grants from The Heineman Foundation. Dr. Leff is an advisor to Medically Home, which provides support to hospital at home programs.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

A “hospital at home” (HaH) program at Atrium Health, a large integrated delivery system in the Southeast, expanded its hospital capacity during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic by providing hospital-level acute care to COVID-19 patients at home, according to a new study in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“Virtual hospital programs have the potential to provide health systems with additional inpatient capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond,” wrote Kranthi Sitammagari, MD, from the Atrium Health Hospitalist Group, Monroe, N.C., and colleagues.

Whereas most previous HaH programs have relied on visiting nurses and physicians, the new study uses telemedicine to connect with patients. Advocate Health Care researchers published the only other study using the telemedicine-powered model in 2015.

The new Atrium Health study evaluated 1,477 patients who received care in the HaH program between March 23 and May 7 of this year after having been diagnosed with COVID-19. The program provided home monitoring and hospital-level care in a home-based virtual observation unit (VOU) and a virtual acute care unit (VACU).

Patients were tested for the virus in Atrium emergency departments, primary care clinics, urgent care centers, and external testing sites. Those who tested positive were invited to be cared for either in the VOU, if they had mild to moderate symptoms, or in the VACU, if they were sick enough to be admitted to the hospital.
 

Patients hop onboard

Nearly all COVID-positive patients tested in these sites agreed to be admitted to the hospital at home, coauthor Stephanie Murphy, DO, medical director of the Atrium Health HaH program, said in an interview.

Patients with moderate symptoms were glad to be monitored at home, she said. When they got to the point where the nurse supervising their care felt they needed escalation to acute care, they were asked whether they wanted to continue to be cared for at home. Most opted to stay home rather than be admitted to the hospital, where their loved ones couldn’t visit them.

Low-acuity patients in the VOU received daily telemonitoring by a nurse to identify disease progression and escalate care as needed. For those who required more care and were admitted to the VACU, a team of paramedics and registered nurses (RNs; mobile clinicians) visited the patient’s home within 24 hours, setting up a hospital bed, other necessary medical equipment, videoconferencing gear, and a remote-monitoring kit that included a blood pressure cuff, a pulse oximeter, and a thermometer.

Dedicated hospitalists and nurses managed patients with 24/7 coverage and monitoring, bringing in other specialties as needed for virtual consults. Mobile clinician and virtual provider visits continued daily until a patient’s condition improved to the point where they could be deescalated back to the VOU. After that, patients received mobile app-driven symptom monitoring and telephone follow-up with a nurse until they got better.
 

Few patients go to hospital

Overall, patients had a median length of stay of 11 days in the VOU or the VACU or both. The vast majority, 1,293 patients (88%), received care in the VOU only. In that cohort, just 40 patients (3%) required hospitalization in an Atrium facility. Sixteen of those patients spent time in an ICU, seven required ventilator support, and two died in the hospital.

A total of 184 patients (12%) were admitted to the VACU. Twenty-one (11%) required intravenous fluids, 16 (9%) received antibiotics, 40 (22%) required inhaler or nebulizer treatments, 41 (22%) used supplemental oxygen, and 24 (13%) were admitted to a conventional hospital. Of the latter patients, 10 were admitted to an ICU, one required a ventilator, and none died in the hospital.

Dr. Sitammagari, a hospitalist and comedical director for quality at Atrium Health, told this news organization that, overall, the outcomes for patients in the system’s HaH were comparable to those seen in the literature among other COVID-19 cohorts.
 

Augmenting hospital capacity

The authors note that treating the 160 VACU patients within the HaH saved hospital beds for other patients. The HaH maintained a consistent census of between 20 and 30 patients for the first 6 weeks as COVID-19 cases spread.

Since last spring, Dr. Murphy said, the Atrium HaH’s daily census has grown to between 30 and 45 patients. “We could absorb 50 patients if our hospitals required it.”

How much capacity does that add to Atrium Health? While there are 50 hospitals in the health system, the HaH was set up mainly to care for COVID-19 patients who would otherwise have been admitted to the 10 acute-care hospitals in the Charlotte, N.C., area. In the 4 weeks ending Nov. 16, these facilities carried an average daily census of around 160 COVID-19 patients, Dr. Murphy noted. “During that time, the Atrium Health HaH has carried, on average, about 20%-25% of that census.”

If the pandemic were to overwhelm area hospitals, she added, “the structure would support flexing up our staffing and supplies to expand to crisis capacity,” which could be up to 200 patients a day.

For the nurses who make most of the phone calls to patients, patients average about 12 to 15 per RN, Dr. Murphy said, and there’s one mobile clinician for every six to nine patients. That’s pretty consistent with the staffing on med-surg floors in hospitals, she said.

The physicians in the program include hospitalists dedicated to telemedicine and some doctors who can’t work in the regular hospital because they’re immunocompromised. The physicians round virtually, covering 12-17 HaH patients per day, according to Dr. Murphy.
 

Prior planning paid off

Unlike some other health care systems that have launched HaH programs with the aid of outside vendors, Atrium Health developed its own HaH and brought it online just 2 weeks after deciding to launch the program. Atrium was able to do this, Dr. Sitammagari explained, because before the pandemic its hospitalist program was already developing an HaH model to improve the care of high-risk patients after hospital discharge to prevent readmission.

While Atrium’s electronic health record system wasn’t designed for hospital at home, its health information technology department and clinicians collaborated in rewriting some of the workflows and order sets in the EHR. For example, they set up a nursing questionnaire to administer after VACU admission, and they created another form for automatic admission to the HaH after a patient tested positive for COVID-19. Atrium staff also modified a patient-doctor communications app to help clinicians monitor HaH patients, Dr. Murphy noted.

Other hospital systems have gotten up to speed on HaH pretty quickly by using platforms supplied by outside vendors. Adventist Health in Los Angeles, for example, started admitting patients to its hospital at home just a month after approaching a vendor called Medically Home.
 

COVID vs. non-COVID patients

Atrium’s decision to focus its HaH effort on COVID-19 patients is unusual among the small but growing number of health systems that have adopted the HaH model to increase their capacity. (Atrium is now transferring some hospitalized patients with other conditions to its HaH, but is still focusing mainly on COVID-19 in its HaH program.)

Bruce Leff, MD, a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, a leading expert on the HaH model, agrees that it can increase hospital capacity significantly.

Dr. Leff praised the Atrium Health study. “It proves that within an integrated delivery system you can quickly deploy and implement a virtual hospital in the specific-use case of COVID, and help patients and help the system at scale,” he said. “They took a bunch of people into the virtual observation unit and thereby kept people from overwhelming their [emergency department] and treated those people safely at home.”

Dr. Leff had no problem with Atrium’s focus on patients with COVID-19 rather than other conditions. “My guess is that they have the ability to take what they developed and apply it to other conditions. Once you have the ability to do acute care at home, you can do a lot at home.”

The biggest barrier to the spread of hospital at home remains the lack of insurer coverage. Dr. Murphy said that health plans are covering virtual physician consultations with patients in the HaH, as well as some other bits and pieces, but not the entire episode of acute care.

Dr. Leff believes that this will start changing soon. COVID-19 has altered the attitudes of physicians and hospitals toward telehealth, he noted, “and it has moved policy makers and payers to start thinking about the new models – home-based care in general and hospital at home in particular. For the first time in 25 years, payers are starting to get interested.”

Most of the authors are employees of Atrium Health. In addition, one coauthor reports being the cofounder of a digital health company, iEnroll, and receiving grants from The Heineman Foundation. Dr. Leff is an advisor to Medically Home, which provides support to hospital at home programs.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

A “hospital at home” (HaH) program at Atrium Health, a large integrated delivery system in the Southeast, expanded its hospital capacity during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic by providing hospital-level acute care to COVID-19 patients at home, according to a new study in Annals of Internal Medicine.

“Virtual hospital programs have the potential to provide health systems with additional inpatient capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond,” wrote Kranthi Sitammagari, MD, from the Atrium Health Hospitalist Group, Monroe, N.C., and colleagues.

Whereas most previous HaH programs have relied on visiting nurses and physicians, the new study uses telemedicine to connect with patients. Advocate Health Care researchers published the only other study using the telemedicine-powered model in 2015.

The new Atrium Health study evaluated 1,477 patients who received care in the HaH program between March 23 and May 7 of this year after having been diagnosed with COVID-19. The program provided home monitoring and hospital-level care in a home-based virtual observation unit (VOU) and a virtual acute care unit (VACU).

Patients were tested for the virus in Atrium emergency departments, primary care clinics, urgent care centers, and external testing sites. Those who tested positive were invited to be cared for either in the VOU, if they had mild to moderate symptoms, or in the VACU, if they were sick enough to be admitted to the hospital.
 

Patients hop onboard

Nearly all COVID-positive patients tested in these sites agreed to be admitted to the hospital at home, coauthor Stephanie Murphy, DO, medical director of the Atrium Health HaH program, said in an interview.

Patients with moderate symptoms were glad to be monitored at home, she said. When they got to the point where the nurse supervising their care felt they needed escalation to acute care, they were asked whether they wanted to continue to be cared for at home. Most opted to stay home rather than be admitted to the hospital, where their loved ones couldn’t visit them.

Low-acuity patients in the VOU received daily telemonitoring by a nurse to identify disease progression and escalate care as needed. For those who required more care and were admitted to the VACU, a team of paramedics and registered nurses (RNs; mobile clinicians) visited the patient’s home within 24 hours, setting up a hospital bed, other necessary medical equipment, videoconferencing gear, and a remote-monitoring kit that included a blood pressure cuff, a pulse oximeter, and a thermometer.

Dedicated hospitalists and nurses managed patients with 24/7 coverage and monitoring, bringing in other specialties as needed for virtual consults. Mobile clinician and virtual provider visits continued daily until a patient’s condition improved to the point where they could be deescalated back to the VOU. After that, patients received mobile app-driven symptom monitoring and telephone follow-up with a nurse until they got better.
 

Few patients go to hospital

Overall, patients had a median length of stay of 11 days in the VOU or the VACU or both. The vast majority, 1,293 patients (88%), received care in the VOU only. In that cohort, just 40 patients (3%) required hospitalization in an Atrium facility. Sixteen of those patients spent time in an ICU, seven required ventilator support, and two died in the hospital.

A total of 184 patients (12%) were admitted to the VACU. Twenty-one (11%) required intravenous fluids, 16 (9%) received antibiotics, 40 (22%) required inhaler or nebulizer treatments, 41 (22%) used supplemental oxygen, and 24 (13%) were admitted to a conventional hospital. Of the latter patients, 10 were admitted to an ICU, one required a ventilator, and none died in the hospital.

Dr. Sitammagari, a hospitalist and comedical director for quality at Atrium Health, told this news organization that, overall, the outcomes for patients in the system’s HaH were comparable to those seen in the literature among other COVID-19 cohorts.
 

Augmenting hospital capacity

The authors note that treating the 160 VACU patients within the HaH saved hospital beds for other patients. The HaH maintained a consistent census of between 20 and 30 patients for the first 6 weeks as COVID-19 cases spread.

Since last spring, Dr. Murphy said, the Atrium HaH’s daily census has grown to between 30 and 45 patients. “We could absorb 50 patients if our hospitals required it.”

How much capacity does that add to Atrium Health? While there are 50 hospitals in the health system, the HaH was set up mainly to care for COVID-19 patients who would otherwise have been admitted to the 10 acute-care hospitals in the Charlotte, N.C., area. In the 4 weeks ending Nov. 16, these facilities carried an average daily census of around 160 COVID-19 patients, Dr. Murphy noted. “During that time, the Atrium Health HaH has carried, on average, about 20%-25% of that census.”

If the pandemic were to overwhelm area hospitals, she added, “the structure would support flexing up our staffing and supplies to expand to crisis capacity,” which could be up to 200 patients a day.

For the nurses who make most of the phone calls to patients, patients average about 12 to 15 per RN, Dr. Murphy said, and there’s one mobile clinician for every six to nine patients. That’s pretty consistent with the staffing on med-surg floors in hospitals, she said.

The physicians in the program include hospitalists dedicated to telemedicine and some doctors who can’t work in the regular hospital because they’re immunocompromised. The physicians round virtually, covering 12-17 HaH patients per day, according to Dr. Murphy.
 

Prior planning paid off

Unlike some other health care systems that have launched HaH programs with the aid of outside vendors, Atrium Health developed its own HaH and brought it online just 2 weeks after deciding to launch the program. Atrium was able to do this, Dr. Sitammagari explained, because before the pandemic its hospitalist program was already developing an HaH model to improve the care of high-risk patients after hospital discharge to prevent readmission.

While Atrium’s electronic health record system wasn’t designed for hospital at home, its health information technology department and clinicians collaborated in rewriting some of the workflows and order sets in the EHR. For example, they set up a nursing questionnaire to administer after VACU admission, and they created another form for automatic admission to the HaH after a patient tested positive for COVID-19. Atrium staff also modified a patient-doctor communications app to help clinicians monitor HaH patients, Dr. Murphy noted.

Other hospital systems have gotten up to speed on HaH pretty quickly by using platforms supplied by outside vendors. Adventist Health in Los Angeles, for example, started admitting patients to its hospital at home just a month after approaching a vendor called Medically Home.
 

COVID vs. non-COVID patients

Atrium’s decision to focus its HaH effort on COVID-19 patients is unusual among the small but growing number of health systems that have adopted the HaH model to increase their capacity. (Atrium is now transferring some hospitalized patients with other conditions to its HaH, but is still focusing mainly on COVID-19 in its HaH program.)

Bruce Leff, MD, a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, a leading expert on the HaH model, agrees that it can increase hospital capacity significantly.

Dr. Leff praised the Atrium Health study. “It proves that within an integrated delivery system you can quickly deploy and implement a virtual hospital in the specific-use case of COVID, and help patients and help the system at scale,” he said. “They took a bunch of people into the virtual observation unit and thereby kept people from overwhelming their [emergency department] and treated those people safely at home.”

Dr. Leff had no problem with Atrium’s focus on patients with COVID-19 rather than other conditions. “My guess is that they have the ability to take what they developed and apply it to other conditions. Once you have the ability to do acute care at home, you can do a lot at home.”

The biggest barrier to the spread of hospital at home remains the lack of insurer coverage. Dr. Murphy said that health plans are covering virtual physician consultations with patients in the HaH, as well as some other bits and pieces, but not the entire episode of acute care.

Dr. Leff believes that this will start changing soon. COVID-19 has altered the attitudes of physicians and hospitals toward telehealth, he noted, “and it has moved policy makers and payers to start thinking about the new models – home-based care in general and hospital at home in particular. For the first time in 25 years, payers are starting to get interested.”

Most of the authors are employees of Atrium Health. In addition, one coauthor reports being the cofounder of a digital health company, iEnroll, and receiving grants from The Heineman Foundation. Dr. Leff is an advisor to Medically Home, which provides support to hospital at home programs.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

“An increasing number of older adults are using multiple medicines, and it is important that the benefits are outweighing the risks,” said Nikesh Parekh, MBBS, MPH, lead author of a recent study of a new predictive tool. The study was done in the context of the World Health Organization campaign to halve the incidence of medication-related harm (MRH) by 2022 – reducing MRH following hospital discharge was identified as a priority area.

This works allows clinicians to calculate the risk of a patient suffering MRH post-discharge requiring health care, said Dr. Parekh, a research fellow at Brighton and Sussex Medical School in Great Britain. “This enables practitioners and policy makers to target interventions to reduce MRH at those with highest risk. This should support the delivery of cost-effective care. The knowledge of individual risk can also prompt clinicians to reconsider any high-risk medicines that they intend on prescribing at discharge.”

This is the first prediction tool to calculate individual patient risk of serious MRH post-discharge, he added.The high readmission rate for older adults is often an avoidable pressure for hospitalists, particularly where MRH is the underlying cause. “The prediction tool has the potential to significantly reduce this burden for hospitalists/patients by identifying those individuals at high risk upon discharge and ensuring that monitoring and additional support is provided to them in the community with their medications,” Dr. Parekh said.

This electronic tool could be integrated into the electronic discharge summaries so that the information can be shared with primary care clinicians in a straightforward way. “The risk score should be calculated automatically by a self-population of the tool’s fields from information that exists on the patient within the electronic discharge system.”The tool now needs to be externally validated through testing in new settings to assess its validity and reliability in new populations. “If the tool is found to be usable by hospitalists and demonstrates reasonable predictive accuracy, then it should be implemented widely to reduce the incidence of MRH,” Dr. Parekh said.
 

Reference

1. Parekh N, et al. Medication-related harm in older adults following hospital discharge: development and validation of a prediction tool. BMJ Qual Saf. Published Online First 2019 Sept 16. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009587.

“An increasing number of older adults are using multiple medicines, and it is important that the benefits are outweighing the risks,” said Nikesh Parekh, MBBS, MPH, lead author of a recent study of a new predictive tool. The study was done in the context of the World Health Organization campaign to halve the incidence of medication-related harm (MRH) by 2022 – reducing MRH following hospital discharge was identified as a priority area.

This works allows clinicians to calculate the risk of a patient suffering MRH post-discharge requiring health care, said Dr. Parekh, a research fellow at Brighton and Sussex Medical School in Great Britain. “This enables practitioners and policy makers to target interventions to reduce MRH at those with highest risk. This should support the delivery of cost-effective care. The knowledge of individual risk can also prompt clinicians to reconsider any high-risk medicines that they intend on prescribing at discharge.”

This is the first prediction tool to calculate individual patient risk of serious MRH post-discharge, he added.The high readmission rate for older adults is often an avoidable pressure for hospitalists, particularly where MRH is the underlying cause. “The prediction tool has the potential to significantly reduce this burden for hospitalists/patients by identifying those individuals at high risk upon discharge and ensuring that monitoring and additional support is provided to them in the community with their medications,” Dr. Parekh said.

This electronic tool could be integrated into the electronic discharge summaries so that the information can be shared with primary care clinicians in a straightforward way. “The risk score should be calculated automatically by a self-population of the tool’s fields from information that exists on the patient within the electronic discharge system.”The tool now needs to be externally validated through testing in new settings to assess its validity and reliability in new populations. “If the tool is found to be usable by hospitalists and demonstrates reasonable predictive accuracy, then it should be implemented widely to reduce the incidence of MRH,” Dr. Parekh said.
 

Reference

1. Parekh N, et al. Medication-related harm in older adults following hospital discharge: development and validation of a prediction tool. BMJ Qual Saf. Published Online First 2019 Sept 16. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009587.

“An increasing number of older adults are using multiple medicines, and it is important that the benefits are outweighing the risks,” said Nikesh Parekh, MBBS, MPH, lead author of a recent study of a new predictive tool. The study was done in the context of the World Health Organization campaign to halve the incidence of medication-related harm (MRH) by 2022 – reducing MRH following hospital discharge was identified as a priority area.

This works allows clinicians to calculate the risk of a patient suffering MRH post-discharge requiring health care, said Dr. Parekh, a research fellow at Brighton and Sussex Medical School in Great Britain. “This enables practitioners and policy makers to target interventions to reduce MRH at those with highest risk. This should support the delivery of cost-effective care. The knowledge of individual risk can also prompt clinicians to reconsider any high-risk medicines that they intend on prescribing at discharge.”

This is the first prediction tool to calculate individual patient risk of serious MRH post-discharge, he added.The high readmission rate for older adults is often an avoidable pressure for hospitalists, particularly where MRH is the underlying cause. “The prediction tool has the potential to significantly reduce this burden for hospitalists/patients by identifying those individuals at high risk upon discharge and ensuring that monitoring and additional support is provided to them in the community with their medications,” Dr. Parekh said.

This electronic tool could be integrated into the electronic discharge summaries so that the information can be shared with primary care clinicians in a straightforward way. “The risk score should be calculated automatically by a self-population of the tool’s fields from information that exists on the patient within the electronic discharge system.”The tool now needs to be externally validated through testing in new settings to assess its validity and reliability in new populations. “If the tool is found to be usable by hospitalists and demonstrates reasonable predictive accuracy, then it should be implemented widely to reduce the incidence of MRH,” Dr. Parekh said.
 

Reference

1. Parekh N, et al. Medication-related harm in older adults following hospital discharge: development and validation of a prediction tool. BMJ Qual Saf. Published Online First 2019 Sept 16. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009587.

The current COVID-19 pandemic has afflicted over 44 million individuals across the planet and been responsible for over 1 million deaths, particularly in high-risk populations. As a result of the overall advanced age, frailty and pre-existing comorbidities of patients with MDS, SARS-Cov2 was feared to be particularly dangerous in this patient population. A recent study by Mossuto et al describes the outcomes of patients with MDS with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Coronavirus outbreak in Italy. Among a total of 5326 patients with MDS followed during the study period, 63 (1.18%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. With a median age of 73 years, the mortality rate among these patients was 52% compared to that of the non-MDS population (24%), and was particularly high on male MDS patients (73% of total deaths). Respiratory failure was the cause of death in all the MDS patients with ARDS in 50% of deceased patients, and with majority of patients who were able to recover having lower risk IPSS-R categories. Interestingly, no differences in mortality or severity of infection were observed based on the type of therapy received for their MDS. These findings are not surprising given the underlying inflammation and immunosuppression in patients with MDS. Until the development of COVID-19 vaccines has been completed, identification of high-risk populations and specific guidelines for the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with MDS remains of paramount importance.

Clonal hematopoiesis is a known cardiovascular risk factor which has been associated with increased risk of cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Recent studies have also associated MDS with higher than expected cardiovascular comorbidities and cardiovascular-related deaths. In accordance to prior publications by Naqvi et al, a recent study by Faber et al retrospectively evaluated 236 MDS patients and studied the associations of somatic mutations with cardiovascular risk. Overall, the authors observed that 27% of patients in their study population developed vascular event, and that ASXL1 mutations were predictive of vascular disease by multivariate analysis (with an odds ratio of 4.2). This data further supports the biological connection between comorbidities and hematopoietic clonal disorders, the role of inflammaging and the need to maximize cardiovascular risk factor care in patients with MDS and develop specific therapies targeting both the disease biology and the underlying mechanisms leading to increased cardiovascular risk.

Guillermo Montalban Bravo, MD
Assistant Professor, Department of Leukemia, Division of Cancer Medicine
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

The current COVID-19 pandemic has afflicted over 44 million individuals across the planet and been responsible for over 1 million deaths, particularly in high-risk populations. As a result of the overall advanced age, frailty and pre-existing comorbidities of patients with MDS, SARS-Cov2 was feared to be particularly dangerous in this patient population. A recent study by Mossuto et al describes the outcomes of patients with MDS with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Coronavirus outbreak in Italy. Among a total of 5326 patients with MDS followed during the study period, 63 (1.18%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. With a median age of 73 years, the mortality rate among these patients was 52% compared to that of the non-MDS population (24%), and was particularly high on male MDS patients (73% of total deaths). Respiratory failure was the cause of death in all the MDS patients with ARDS in 50% of deceased patients, and with majority of patients who were able to recover having lower risk IPSS-R categories. Interestingly, no differences in mortality or severity of infection were observed based on the type of therapy received for their MDS. These findings are not surprising given the underlying inflammation and immunosuppression in patients with MDS. Until the development of COVID-19 vaccines has been completed, identification of high-risk populations and specific guidelines for the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with MDS remains of paramount importance.

Clonal hematopoiesis is a known cardiovascular risk factor which has been associated with increased risk of cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Recent studies have also associated MDS with higher than expected cardiovascular comorbidities and cardiovascular-related deaths. In accordance to prior publications by Naqvi et al, a recent study by Faber et al retrospectively evaluated 236 MDS patients and studied the associations of somatic mutations with cardiovascular risk. Overall, the authors observed that 27% of patients in their study population developed vascular event, and that ASXL1 mutations were predictive of vascular disease by multivariate analysis (with an odds ratio of 4.2). This data further supports the biological connection between comorbidities and hematopoietic clonal disorders, the role of inflammaging and the need to maximize cardiovascular risk factor care in patients with MDS and develop specific therapies targeting both the disease biology and the underlying mechanisms leading to increased cardiovascular risk.

Guillermo Montalban Bravo, MD
Assistant Professor, Department of Leukemia, Division of Cancer Medicine
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

The current COVID-19 pandemic has afflicted over 44 million individuals across the planet and been responsible for over 1 million deaths, particularly in high-risk populations. As a result of the overall advanced age, frailty and pre-existing comorbidities of patients with MDS, SARS-Cov2 was feared to be particularly dangerous in this patient population. A recent study by Mossuto et al describes the outcomes of patients with MDS with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the Coronavirus outbreak in Italy. Among a total of 5326 patients with MDS followed during the study period, 63 (1.18%) had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. With a median age of 73 years, the mortality rate among these patients was 52% compared to that of the non-MDS population (24%), and was particularly high on male MDS patients (73% of total deaths). Respiratory failure was the cause of death in all the MDS patients with ARDS in 50% of deceased patients, and with majority of patients who were able to recover having lower risk IPSS-R categories. Interestingly, no differences in mortality or severity of infection were observed based on the type of therapy received for their MDS. These findings are not surprising given the underlying inflammation and immunosuppression in patients with MDS. Until the development of COVID-19 vaccines has been completed, identification of high-risk populations and specific guidelines for the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with MDS remains of paramount importance.

Clonal hematopoiesis is a known cardiovascular risk factor which has been associated with increased risk of cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Recent studies have also associated MDS with higher than expected cardiovascular comorbidities and cardiovascular-related deaths. In accordance to prior publications by Naqvi et al, a recent study by Faber et al retrospectively evaluated 236 MDS patients and studied the associations of somatic mutations with cardiovascular risk. Overall, the authors observed that 27% of patients in their study population developed vascular event, and that ASXL1 mutations were predictive of vascular disease by multivariate analysis (with an odds ratio of 4.2). This data further supports the biological connection between comorbidities and hematopoietic clonal disorders, the role of inflammaging and the need to maximize cardiovascular risk factor care in patients with MDS and develop specific therapies targeting both the disease biology and the underlying mechanisms leading to increased cardiovascular risk.

Guillermo Montalban Bravo, MD
Assistant Professor, Department of Leukemia, Division of Cancer Medicine
MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Key clinical point: Gene mutations involving ASXL1 were significantly associated with increased risk of vascular events in adults with myelodysplastic syndrome, but Trisomy 8 appeared to have a protective effect.

Major finding: Overall, the incidence of vascular disease in the study population was 27%; mutations in the ASXL1 in particular were significant predictors of vascular disease in multivariate analysis (odds ratio 4.2); however, both elevated ferritin and Trisomy 8 were significantly associated with a lower risk of vascular disease in low-risk MDS patients (P = .043 and P = .036, respectively).

Study details: The data come from a retrospective analysis of 236 MDS patients aged 18 years and older who were seen and treated at a single center between 2010 and 2018.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.  

Citation: Faber MG et al. eJHaem. 2020 Sept 28. doi: 10.1002/jha2.101.

Key clinical point: Gene mutations involving ASXL1 were significantly associated with increased risk of vascular events in adults with myelodysplastic syndrome, but Trisomy 8 appeared to have a protective effect.

Major finding: Overall, the incidence of vascular disease in the study population was 27%; mutations in the ASXL1 in particular were significant predictors of vascular disease in multivariate analysis (odds ratio 4.2); however, both elevated ferritin and Trisomy 8 were significantly associated with a lower risk of vascular disease in low-risk MDS patients (P = .043 and P = .036, respectively).

Study details: The data come from a retrospective analysis of 236 MDS patients aged 18 years and older who were seen and treated at a single center between 2010 and 2018.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.  

Citation: Faber MG et al. eJHaem. 2020 Sept 28. doi: 10.1002/jha2.101.

Key clinical point: Gene mutations involving ASXL1 were significantly associated with increased risk of vascular events in adults with myelodysplastic syndrome, but Trisomy 8 appeared to have a protective effect.

Major finding: Overall, the incidence of vascular disease in the study population was 27%; mutations in the ASXL1 in particular were significant predictors of vascular disease in multivariate analysis (odds ratio 4.2); however, both elevated ferritin and Trisomy 8 were significantly associated with a lower risk of vascular disease in low-risk MDS patients (P = .043 and P = .036, respectively).

Study details: The data come from a retrospective analysis of 236 MDS patients aged 18 years and older who were seen and treated at a single center between 2010 and 2018.

Disclosures: The study received no outside funding. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.  

Citation: Faber MG et al. eJHaem. 2020 Sept 28. doi: 10.1002/jha2.101.

Key clinical point: Myelodysplastic syndrome patients who had a slower luspatercept apparent clearance (CL/F) were more likely to achieve erythroid responses, suggesting potential as an early efficacy marker.

Major finding: Luspatercept given over a dose range of 0.125 mg/kg-1.75 mg/kg yielded linear and time-invariant pharmacokinetics when given to MDS patients with anemia subcutaneously once every 3 weeks; the odds of transfusion independence at a minimum of 8 weeks increased with time-averaged exposure and plateaued at 1.0 mg/kg-1.75 mg/kg.

Study details: The data come from a review of several studies including 260 adults with anemia caused by myelodysplastic syndromes.

Disclosures: The studies in the review were funded by Bristol Myers Squibb or Acceleron. Lead author Dr. Chen and several coauthors are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb.

Citation: Chen N et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 June 30. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12521.

Key clinical point: Myelodysplastic syndrome patients who had a slower luspatercept apparent clearance (CL/F) were more likely to achieve erythroid responses, suggesting potential as an early efficacy marker.

Major finding: Luspatercept given over a dose range of 0.125 mg/kg-1.75 mg/kg yielded linear and time-invariant pharmacokinetics when given to MDS patients with anemia subcutaneously once every 3 weeks; the odds of transfusion independence at a minimum of 8 weeks increased with time-averaged exposure and plateaued at 1.0 mg/kg-1.75 mg/kg.

Study details: The data come from a review of several studies including 260 adults with anemia caused by myelodysplastic syndromes.

Disclosures: The studies in the review were funded by Bristol Myers Squibb or Acceleron. Lead author Dr. Chen and several coauthors are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb.

Citation: Chen N et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 June 30. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12521.

Key clinical point: Myelodysplastic syndrome patients who had a slower luspatercept apparent clearance (CL/F) were more likely to achieve erythroid responses, suggesting potential as an early efficacy marker.

Major finding: Luspatercept given over a dose range of 0.125 mg/kg-1.75 mg/kg yielded linear and time-invariant pharmacokinetics when given to MDS patients with anemia subcutaneously once every 3 weeks; the odds of transfusion independence at a minimum of 8 weeks increased with time-averaged exposure and plateaued at 1.0 mg/kg-1.75 mg/kg.

Study details: The data come from a review of several studies including 260 adults with anemia caused by myelodysplastic syndromes.

Disclosures: The studies in the review were funded by Bristol Myers Squibb or Acceleron. Lead author Dr. Chen and several coauthors are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb.

Citation: Chen N et al. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 June 30. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12521.

Key clinical point: Approximately half of transfusion-dependent MDS patients said they had not discussed ways to reduce the need for transfusions with their doctors and 74% said there were no alternatives to blood transfusions.

Major finding: Among adults with MDS, those with disease duration less than 5 years cited transfusion reactions as their greatest concern; those with longer disease duration cited iron overload. However, a majority of 71% of the patients ranked their quality of life as good or excellent. MDS physicians reported that they would be most likely to offer blood transfusions as primary therapy to patients who were older than 80 years, frail, had lower risk MDS, or had other significant comorbidities.

Study details: The data come from a pair of cross-sectional surveys including 157 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients and 109 MDS physicians.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation through a grant from Celgene. Lead author Dr. King was supported in part by The Maren Research Award Scholarship through the University of Florida.

Citation: King D et al. Leuk Res. 2020 July 15. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2020.106425.

Key clinical point: Approximately half of transfusion-dependent MDS patients said they had not discussed ways to reduce the need for transfusions with their doctors and 74% said there were no alternatives to blood transfusions.

Major finding: Among adults with MDS, those with disease duration less than 5 years cited transfusion reactions as their greatest concern; those with longer disease duration cited iron overload. However, a majority of 71% of the patients ranked their quality of life as good or excellent. MDS physicians reported that they would be most likely to offer blood transfusions as primary therapy to patients who were older than 80 years, frail, had lower risk MDS, or had other significant comorbidities.

Study details: The data come from a pair of cross-sectional surveys including 157 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients and 109 MDS physicians.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation through a grant from Celgene. Lead author Dr. King was supported in part by The Maren Research Award Scholarship through the University of Florida.

Citation: King D et al. Leuk Res. 2020 July 15. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2020.106425.

Key clinical point: Approximately half of transfusion-dependent MDS patients said they had not discussed ways to reduce the need for transfusions with their doctors and 74% said there were no alternatives to blood transfusions.

Major finding: Among adults with MDS, those with disease duration less than 5 years cited transfusion reactions as their greatest concern; those with longer disease duration cited iron overload. However, a majority of 71% of the patients ranked their quality of life as good or excellent. MDS physicians reported that they would be most likely to offer blood transfusions as primary therapy to patients who were older than 80 years, frail, had lower risk MDS, or had other significant comorbidities.

Study details: The data come from a pair of cross-sectional surveys including 157 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients and 109 MDS physicians.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Aplastic Anemia and MDS International Foundation through a grant from Celgene. Lead author Dr. King was supported in part by The Maren Research Award Scholarship through the University of Florida.

Citation: King D et al. Leuk Res. 2020 July 15. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2020.106425.

Key clinical point: Bronchoscopy was safe for most patients with malignant hematologic disorders with careful monitoring and use of sedatives, particularly midazolam.

Major finding: A total of 12 out of 272 patients (3.8%) experienced prolonged oxygen desaturation; 7 of these recovered and 5 died from lung lesion deterioration. However, midazolam reduced the risk of prolonged oxygen desaturation in the study population.

Study details: The data come from a review of 316 bronchoscopies in 282 adults with malignant hematologic disorders and pulmonary infiltrates who were treated at a single center.

Disclosures: Lead author Dr. Uruga disclosed grant support from Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research.

Citation: Uruga H et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Sep 11. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01283-8.

Key clinical point: Bronchoscopy was safe for most patients with malignant hematologic disorders with careful monitoring and use of sedatives, particularly midazolam.

Major finding: A total of 12 out of 272 patients (3.8%) experienced prolonged oxygen desaturation; 7 of these recovered and 5 died from lung lesion deterioration. However, midazolam reduced the risk of prolonged oxygen desaturation in the study population.

Study details: The data come from a review of 316 bronchoscopies in 282 adults with malignant hematologic disorders and pulmonary infiltrates who were treated at a single center.

Disclosures: Lead author Dr. Uruga disclosed grant support from Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research.

Citation: Uruga H et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Sep 11. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01283-8.

Key clinical point: Bronchoscopy was safe for most patients with malignant hematologic disorders with careful monitoring and use of sedatives, particularly midazolam.

Major finding: A total of 12 out of 272 patients (3.8%) experienced prolonged oxygen desaturation; 7 of these recovered and 5 died from lung lesion deterioration. However, midazolam reduced the risk of prolonged oxygen desaturation in the study population.

Study details: The data come from a review of 316 bronchoscopies in 282 adults with malignant hematologic disorders and pulmonary infiltrates who were treated at a single center.

Disclosures: Lead author Dr. Uruga disclosed grant support from Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research.

Citation: Uruga H et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Sep 11. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01283-8.

Key clinical point: Adults with end-stage renal disease who underwent dialysis for at least six months were at significantly increased risk for MDS compared with healthy controls.

Major finding: Patients with chronic renal failure who underwent dialysis were significantly more likely to develop myelodysplastic syndrome compared to healthy controls (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.60); older age also was significantly associated with increased MDS risk (sHR 1.03).

Study details: The data come from a study of 74,712 adults with chronic renal failure diagnoses between 1997 and 2013 who underwent dialysis, and matched controls. Participants were follow from index date to the first occurrence of MDS, withdrawal from the NHI program, or the last day of 2013.

Disclosures: The study used the National Health Insurance Research Database established by the National Health Research Institutes with the authorization of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Chang M-Y et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Sept 23. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72568-5.

Key clinical point: Adults with end-stage renal disease who underwent dialysis for at least six months were at significantly increased risk for MDS compared with healthy controls.

Major finding: Patients with chronic renal failure who underwent dialysis were significantly more likely to develop myelodysplastic syndrome compared to healthy controls (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.60); older age also was significantly associated with increased MDS risk (sHR 1.03).

Study details: The data come from a study of 74,712 adults with chronic renal failure diagnoses between 1997 and 2013 who underwent dialysis, and matched controls. Participants were follow from index date to the first occurrence of MDS, withdrawal from the NHI program, or the last day of 2013.

Disclosures: The study used the National Health Insurance Research Database established by the National Health Research Institutes with the authorization of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Chang M-Y et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Sept 23. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72568-5.

Key clinical point: Adults with end-stage renal disease who underwent dialysis for at least six months were at significantly increased risk for MDS compared with healthy controls.

Major finding: Patients with chronic renal failure who underwent dialysis were significantly more likely to develop myelodysplastic syndrome compared to healthy controls (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.60); older age also was significantly associated with increased MDS risk (sHR 1.03).

Study details: The data come from a study of 74,712 adults with chronic renal failure diagnoses between 1997 and 2013 who underwent dialysis, and matched controls. Participants were follow from index date to the first occurrence of MDS, withdrawal from the NHI program, or the last day of 2013.

Disclosures: The study used the National Health Insurance Research Database established by the National Health Research Institutes with the authorization of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Chang M-Y et al. Sci Rep. 2020 Sept 23. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72568-5.

The days of using chemotherapy to treat Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) may be numbered.

In a phase 2 trial, upfront chemotherapy-free induction/consolidation with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib (Sprycel) and the bispecific T-cell engager antibody blinatumomab (Blincyto) yielded high rates of molecular response, “impressive” survival at 18 months, and few toxic effects of grade 3 or higher, say researchers.

With this approach, “60% of adult Ph+ ALL patients, of all ages, can obtain a molecular response, and this percent can increase further with more cycles of blinatumomab,” lead researcher Robin Foà, MD, from Sapienza University of Rome, said in an interview.

“The rates of disease-free survival and overall survival at 18 months are highly favorable, and the protocol is associated with limited toxicity,” Dr. Foà added.

“I see this chemo-free approach becoming a realistic approach for a substantial proportion of adult Ph+ ALL patients, particularly for the older patients, keeping in mind that the incidence of Ph+ ALL increases with age,” Dr. Foà said.

The results of the study were published Oct. 22 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
 

‘Innovative’ and ‘highly successful’

This “innovative” chemotherapy-free approach proved “highly successful” with “surprisingly” few toxic effects, Dieter Hoelzer, MD, PhD, University of Frankfurt (Germany), wrote in a linked editorial.

The Italian GIMEMA LAL2116 D-ALBA trial enrolled 63 adults (median age, 54 years; range, 24-82 years) with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. All patients received a glucocorticoid for 31 days beginning 7 days before starting treatment with dasatinib.

Dasatinib (140 mg once daily) induction therapy lasted 85 days. All patients who completed the induction phase received blinatumomab (28 mcg/d) consolidation therapy. Dexamethasone (20 mg) was administered before each blinatumomab cycle. To prevent central nervous system adverse events, levetiracetam (500 mg twice daily) was administered.

All but two patients completed dasatinib induction. One was a 73-year-old woman who withdrew from the trial because of toxic effects after 10 days of dasatinib treatment. She later died of pneumonia. The other was an 82-year-old woman who had a complete hematologic response but left the trial because of pneumonia and pneumonitis.

At the end of the induction phase, 98% of the patients (62 of 63) had a complete hematologic response, including the patient with a complete hematologic response who withdrew; 29% (17 of 59 patients) had a molecular response.

Of the 61 patients who completed the induction phase, 58 received one cycle of blinatumomab, 56 received two cycles, 45 received three cycles, 37 received four cycles, and 29 received five cycles. At the end of the second blinatumomab cycle, 60% of the patients (33 of 55 patients) had a molecular response.

The percentage of patients with a molecular response increased further after receiving additional cycles of blinatumomab – to 70% (28 of 40 patients) after the third cycle, 81% (29 of 36 patients) after the fourth cycle, and 72% (21 of 29 patients) after the fifth cycle.

At a median follow-up of 18 months, overall survival was 95%, and disease-free survival was 88%.

There were no significant differences in DFS between patients with p190-kd fusion protein (85%) and those with p210-kd fusion protein (95%). However, DFS was lower in patients with IKZF1 deletion plus additional genetic aberrations (CDKN2A or CDKN2B, PAX5, or both).

ABL1 mutations were present in six patients who had increased minimal residual disease during induction therapy. All these mutations were cleared by blinatumomab.

There were six relapses, of which three were hematologic. One occurred in a patient with a major protocol violation (a delay of more than 2 months in receiving blinatumomab), one occurred after 12 months in the patient who discontinued the trial after receiving dasatinib for 12 days, and one occurred in a patient after the second cycle of blinatumomab.

A total of 21 adverse events of grade 3 or higher were noted. They included cytomegalovirus reactivation or infection in six patients; neutropenia in four patients; persistent fever in two patients; and pleural effusion, pulmonary hypertension, and a neurologic disorder in one patient each.

Of the 24 patients who received a stem-cell allograft, two died, but only one death was related to transplant (4%).

The very low nonrelapse mortality among patients who underwent transplant during remission is “remarkable,” Dr. Hoelzer wrote. It suggests that toxicity from induction chemotherapy puts the patient at risk for toxic effects and death from subsequent stem-cell transplant – “a consequence that is avoided with targeted therapy.”
 

Unanswered questions

“Will the excellent outcomes be preserved with longer follow-up? The answer is probably yes, given that the majority of relapses in ALL occur within the first 1.5 to 2.0 years after the initiation of treatment,” Dr. Hoelzer wrote.

He said other outstanding questions include whether long-term outcomes will differ between patients who undergo transplant and those who do not; whether ABL1 mutations emerge; whether minimal residual disease recurs with longer follow-up; and whether this treatment approach can be used for patients with other subtypes of ALL, such as Ph-negative, B-lineage ALL, or even T-cell ALL.

“If these promising trial results hold, chemotherapy-free induction without the immediate and long-term toxic effects of intensive chemotherapy regimens could also be used in adolescents and, finally, in children. These questions will need to be addressed with longer follow-up and large, prospective trials,” Dr. Hoelzer concluded.

The study was supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research and Sapienza University of Rome.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com

The days of using chemotherapy to treat Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) may be numbered.

In a phase 2 trial, upfront chemotherapy-free induction/consolidation with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib (Sprycel) and the bispecific T-cell engager antibody blinatumomab (Blincyto) yielded high rates of molecular response, “impressive” survival at 18 months, and few toxic effects of grade 3 or higher, say researchers.

With this approach, “60% of adult Ph+ ALL patients, of all ages, can obtain a molecular response, and this percent can increase further with more cycles of blinatumomab,” lead researcher Robin Foà, MD, from Sapienza University of Rome, said in an interview.

“The rates of disease-free survival and overall survival at 18 months are highly favorable, and the protocol is associated with limited toxicity,” Dr. Foà added.

“I see this chemo-free approach becoming a realistic approach for a substantial proportion of adult Ph+ ALL patients, particularly for the older patients, keeping in mind that the incidence of Ph+ ALL increases with age,” Dr. Foà said.

The results of the study were published Oct. 22 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
 

‘Innovative’ and ‘highly successful’

This “innovative” chemotherapy-free approach proved “highly successful” with “surprisingly” few toxic effects, Dieter Hoelzer, MD, PhD, University of Frankfurt (Germany), wrote in a linked editorial.

The Italian GIMEMA LAL2116 D-ALBA trial enrolled 63 adults (median age, 54 years; range, 24-82 years) with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. All patients received a glucocorticoid for 31 days beginning 7 days before starting treatment with dasatinib.

Dasatinib (140 mg once daily) induction therapy lasted 85 days. All patients who completed the induction phase received blinatumomab (28 mcg/d) consolidation therapy. Dexamethasone (20 mg) was administered before each blinatumomab cycle. To prevent central nervous system adverse events, levetiracetam (500 mg twice daily) was administered.

All but two patients completed dasatinib induction. One was a 73-year-old woman who withdrew from the trial because of toxic effects after 10 days of dasatinib treatment. She later died of pneumonia. The other was an 82-year-old woman who had a complete hematologic response but left the trial because of pneumonia and pneumonitis.

At the end of the induction phase, 98% of the patients (62 of 63) had a complete hematologic response, including the patient with a complete hematologic response who withdrew; 29% (17 of 59 patients) had a molecular response.

Of the 61 patients who completed the induction phase, 58 received one cycle of blinatumomab, 56 received two cycles, 45 received three cycles, 37 received four cycles, and 29 received five cycles. At the end of the second blinatumomab cycle, 60% of the patients (33 of 55 patients) had a molecular response.

The percentage of patients with a molecular response increased further after receiving additional cycles of blinatumomab – to 70% (28 of 40 patients) after the third cycle, 81% (29 of 36 patients) after the fourth cycle, and 72% (21 of 29 patients) after the fifth cycle.

At a median follow-up of 18 months, overall survival was 95%, and disease-free survival was 88%.

There were no significant differences in DFS between patients with p190-kd fusion protein (85%) and those with p210-kd fusion protein (95%). However, DFS was lower in patients with IKZF1 deletion plus additional genetic aberrations (CDKN2A or CDKN2B, PAX5, or both).

ABL1 mutations were present in six patients who had increased minimal residual disease during induction therapy. All these mutations were cleared by blinatumomab.

There were six relapses, of which three were hematologic. One occurred in a patient with a major protocol violation (a delay of more than 2 months in receiving blinatumomab), one occurred after 12 months in the patient who discontinued the trial after receiving dasatinib for 12 days, and one occurred in a patient after the second cycle of blinatumomab.

A total of 21 adverse events of grade 3 or higher were noted. They included cytomegalovirus reactivation or infection in six patients; neutropenia in four patients; persistent fever in two patients; and pleural effusion, pulmonary hypertension, and a neurologic disorder in one patient each.

Of the 24 patients who received a stem-cell allograft, two died, but only one death was related to transplant (4%).

The very low nonrelapse mortality among patients who underwent transplant during remission is “remarkable,” Dr. Hoelzer wrote. It suggests that toxicity from induction chemotherapy puts the patient at risk for toxic effects and death from subsequent stem-cell transplant – “a consequence that is avoided with targeted therapy.”
 

Unanswered questions

“Will the excellent outcomes be preserved with longer follow-up? The answer is probably yes, given that the majority of relapses in ALL occur within the first 1.5 to 2.0 years after the initiation of treatment,” Dr. Hoelzer wrote.

He said other outstanding questions include whether long-term outcomes will differ between patients who undergo transplant and those who do not; whether ABL1 mutations emerge; whether minimal residual disease recurs with longer follow-up; and whether this treatment approach can be used for patients with other subtypes of ALL, such as Ph-negative, B-lineage ALL, or even T-cell ALL.

“If these promising trial results hold, chemotherapy-free induction without the immediate and long-term toxic effects of intensive chemotherapy regimens could also be used in adolescents and, finally, in children. These questions will need to be addressed with longer follow-up and large, prospective trials,” Dr. Hoelzer concluded.

The study was supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research and Sapienza University of Rome.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com

The days of using chemotherapy to treat Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) may be numbered.

In a phase 2 trial, upfront chemotherapy-free induction/consolidation with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib (Sprycel) and the bispecific T-cell engager antibody blinatumomab (Blincyto) yielded high rates of molecular response, “impressive” survival at 18 months, and few toxic effects of grade 3 or higher, say researchers.

With this approach, “60% of adult Ph+ ALL patients, of all ages, can obtain a molecular response, and this percent can increase further with more cycles of blinatumomab,” lead researcher Robin Foà, MD, from Sapienza University of Rome, said in an interview.

“The rates of disease-free survival and overall survival at 18 months are highly favorable, and the protocol is associated with limited toxicity,” Dr. Foà added.

“I see this chemo-free approach becoming a realistic approach for a substantial proportion of adult Ph+ ALL patients, particularly for the older patients, keeping in mind that the incidence of Ph+ ALL increases with age,” Dr. Foà said.

The results of the study were published Oct. 22 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
 

‘Innovative’ and ‘highly successful’

This “innovative” chemotherapy-free approach proved “highly successful” with “surprisingly” few toxic effects, Dieter Hoelzer, MD, PhD, University of Frankfurt (Germany), wrote in a linked editorial.

The Italian GIMEMA LAL2116 D-ALBA trial enrolled 63 adults (median age, 54 years; range, 24-82 years) with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL. All patients received a glucocorticoid for 31 days beginning 7 days before starting treatment with dasatinib.

Dasatinib (140 mg once daily) induction therapy lasted 85 days. All patients who completed the induction phase received blinatumomab (28 mcg/d) consolidation therapy. Dexamethasone (20 mg) was administered before each blinatumomab cycle. To prevent central nervous system adverse events, levetiracetam (500 mg twice daily) was administered.

All but two patients completed dasatinib induction. One was a 73-year-old woman who withdrew from the trial because of toxic effects after 10 days of dasatinib treatment. She later died of pneumonia. The other was an 82-year-old woman who had a complete hematologic response but left the trial because of pneumonia and pneumonitis.

At the end of the induction phase, 98% of the patients (62 of 63) had a complete hematologic response, including the patient with a complete hematologic response who withdrew; 29% (17 of 59 patients) had a molecular response.

Of the 61 patients who completed the induction phase, 58 received one cycle of blinatumomab, 56 received two cycles, 45 received three cycles, 37 received four cycles, and 29 received five cycles. At the end of the second blinatumomab cycle, 60% of the patients (33 of 55 patients) had a molecular response.

The percentage of patients with a molecular response increased further after receiving additional cycles of blinatumomab – to 70% (28 of 40 patients) after the third cycle, 81% (29 of 36 patients) after the fourth cycle, and 72% (21 of 29 patients) after the fifth cycle.

At a median follow-up of 18 months, overall survival was 95%, and disease-free survival was 88%.

There were no significant differences in DFS between patients with p190-kd fusion protein (85%) and those with p210-kd fusion protein (95%). However, DFS was lower in patients with IKZF1 deletion plus additional genetic aberrations (CDKN2A or CDKN2B, PAX5, or both).

ABL1 mutations were present in six patients who had increased minimal residual disease during induction therapy. All these mutations were cleared by blinatumomab.

There were six relapses, of which three were hematologic. One occurred in a patient with a major protocol violation (a delay of more than 2 months in receiving blinatumomab), one occurred after 12 months in the patient who discontinued the trial after receiving dasatinib for 12 days, and one occurred in a patient after the second cycle of blinatumomab.

A total of 21 adverse events of grade 3 or higher were noted. They included cytomegalovirus reactivation or infection in six patients; neutropenia in four patients; persistent fever in two patients; and pleural effusion, pulmonary hypertension, and a neurologic disorder in one patient each.

Of the 24 patients who received a stem-cell allograft, two died, but only one death was related to transplant (4%).

The very low nonrelapse mortality among patients who underwent transplant during remission is “remarkable,” Dr. Hoelzer wrote. It suggests that toxicity from induction chemotherapy puts the patient at risk for toxic effects and death from subsequent stem-cell transplant – “a consequence that is avoided with targeted therapy.”
 

Unanswered questions

“Will the excellent outcomes be preserved with longer follow-up? The answer is probably yes, given that the majority of relapses in ALL occur within the first 1.5 to 2.0 years after the initiation of treatment,” Dr. Hoelzer wrote.

He said other outstanding questions include whether long-term outcomes will differ between patients who undergo transplant and those who do not; whether ABL1 mutations emerge; whether minimal residual disease recurs with longer follow-up; and whether this treatment approach can be used for patients with other subtypes of ALL, such as Ph-negative, B-lineage ALL, or even T-cell ALL.

“If these promising trial results hold, chemotherapy-free induction without the immediate and long-term toxic effects of intensive chemotherapy regimens could also be used in adolescents and, finally, in children. These questions will need to be addressed with longer follow-up and large, prospective trials,” Dr. Hoelzer concluded.

The study was supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research and Sapienza University of Rome.

A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com

Key clinical point: Several long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were strongly associated with disease pathogenesis and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients.

Major finding: Based on genome-wide profiling, lncRNA gene networks with expression of H19, WT1-AS, TCL6, and LEF1-AS1 were associated with higher-risk MDS; of these, H19 also showed promise as a therapeutic target because of its strong predictive value for lower complete remission rate of induction therapy in AML in the presence of H19 overexpression. 

Study details: The data come from a study of genetic profiling including 54 patients with MDS, 14 patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), and 9 healthy donors.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Project for Conceptual Development of Research Organization from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Szikszai K et al. Cancers. 2020 Sept 23. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102726.

Key clinical point: Several long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were strongly associated with disease pathogenesis and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients.

Major finding: Based on genome-wide profiling, lncRNA gene networks with expression of H19, WT1-AS, TCL6, and LEF1-AS1 were associated with higher-risk MDS; of these, H19 also showed promise as a therapeutic target because of its strong predictive value for lower complete remission rate of induction therapy in AML in the presence of H19 overexpression. 

Study details: The data come from a study of genetic profiling including 54 patients with MDS, 14 patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), and 9 healthy donors.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Project for Conceptual Development of Research Organization from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Szikszai K et al. Cancers. 2020 Sept 23. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102726.

Key clinical point: Several long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were strongly associated with disease pathogenesis and prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients.

Major finding: Based on genome-wide profiling, lncRNA gene networks with expression of H19, WT1-AS, TCL6, and LEF1-AS1 were associated with higher-risk MDS; of these, H19 also showed promise as a therapeutic target because of its strong predictive value for lower complete remission rate of induction therapy in AML in the presence of H19 overexpression. 

Study details: The data come from a study of genetic profiling including 54 patients with MDS, 14 patients with acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC), and 9 healthy donors.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Project for Conceptual Development of Research Organization from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic. The researchers had no financial conflicts to disclose.

Citation: Szikszai K et al. Cancers. 2020 Sept 23. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102726.