Short course of prednisolone may help distinguish between RA and hand OA

Article Type
Changed

 

A short course of prednisolone may help rheumatologists differentiate between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, a proof of concept study shows.

Dr. Uta Kiltz
“The basic idea is that RA is due to inflammation, whereas OA [osteoarthritis] is either not based on the same pathophysiology, or at least not to the same degree,” they wrote.

The pilot part of the TryCort study involved 15 patients with confirmed osteoarthritis and 15 with rheumatoid arthritis who were given 1 g of paracetamol (acetaminophen) a day for 5 days, and on days 3-5, they were given a 20-mg dose of prednisolone (Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:73. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1279-z).

Results showed that the patients with RA had greater improvements in their pain scores (0-10 on a numerical rating scale), compared with OA patients. The mean percentage improvement in pain scores at day 5 was 52.3% in the RA group and 22.0% in the OA group.

The research team considered that a 40% improvement in pain scores was the best choice between sensitivity and specificity regarding a diagnosis of RA.

At this 40% improvement cut-off, the “pred-test” was positive in 11 patients with RA and in four patients with OA (P = .012), with a sensitivity and specificity for a diagnosis of RA of 73.3% for both measures.

In order to validate the test, the researchers enrolled 95 patients with pain in their fingers and hands but without a clear diagnosis. These patients completed the 5-day intervention, and then at week 12 a rheumatologist diagnosed 47 as having RA and 48 were thought to not have RA.

The patients with diagnosed RA had a higher reduction in pain scores during the treatment with prednisolone, compared with patients without RA.

The median percentage of improvement at day 5 was higher in patients with RA than in those without RA (50% [interquartile range, 30%-60%] vs. 20% [IQR, 10%-30%]; P = .001). Overall, 40 of the 95 patients had an improvement of more than 40% in pain levels on day 5, fulfilling the criteria of a positive pred-test.

However, the authors noted that 31 patients with RA had a positive pred-test (77.5%), compared with nine (22.5%) patients without RA (P greater than .001).

The sensitivity of the pred-test for a diagnosis of RA was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.8) and the specificity was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.7-0.9). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.77 and 0.70, respectively.

The authors concluded that the pred-test “performed well” but not “perfectly well.”

“We are aware that the pred-test without confirmation of other surrogate markers is not helpful in clinical decision-making processes,” they said. “We, therefore, recommend use of the test in light of other confirming factors, such as history, physical examination, imaging, and laboratory results.”

The test could be used to triage patients from primary care to rheumatologist care, they suggested.

The study was financially supported by Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Publications
Topics
Sections

 

A short course of prednisolone may help rheumatologists differentiate between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, a proof of concept study shows.

Dr. Uta Kiltz
“The basic idea is that RA is due to inflammation, whereas OA [osteoarthritis] is either not based on the same pathophysiology, or at least not to the same degree,” they wrote.

The pilot part of the TryCort study involved 15 patients with confirmed osteoarthritis and 15 with rheumatoid arthritis who were given 1 g of paracetamol (acetaminophen) a day for 5 days, and on days 3-5, they were given a 20-mg dose of prednisolone (Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:73. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1279-z).

Results showed that the patients with RA had greater improvements in their pain scores (0-10 on a numerical rating scale), compared with OA patients. The mean percentage improvement in pain scores at day 5 was 52.3% in the RA group and 22.0% in the OA group.

The research team considered that a 40% improvement in pain scores was the best choice between sensitivity and specificity regarding a diagnosis of RA.

At this 40% improvement cut-off, the “pred-test” was positive in 11 patients with RA and in four patients with OA (P = .012), with a sensitivity and specificity for a diagnosis of RA of 73.3% for both measures.

In order to validate the test, the researchers enrolled 95 patients with pain in their fingers and hands but without a clear diagnosis. These patients completed the 5-day intervention, and then at week 12 a rheumatologist diagnosed 47 as having RA and 48 were thought to not have RA.

The patients with diagnosed RA had a higher reduction in pain scores during the treatment with prednisolone, compared with patients without RA.

The median percentage of improvement at day 5 was higher in patients with RA than in those without RA (50% [interquartile range, 30%-60%] vs. 20% [IQR, 10%-30%]; P = .001). Overall, 40 of the 95 patients had an improvement of more than 40% in pain levels on day 5, fulfilling the criteria of a positive pred-test.

However, the authors noted that 31 patients with RA had a positive pred-test (77.5%), compared with nine (22.5%) patients without RA (P greater than .001).

The sensitivity of the pred-test for a diagnosis of RA was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.8) and the specificity was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.7-0.9). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.77 and 0.70, respectively.

The authors concluded that the pred-test “performed well” but not “perfectly well.”

“We are aware that the pred-test without confirmation of other surrogate markers is not helpful in clinical decision-making processes,” they said. “We, therefore, recommend use of the test in light of other confirming factors, such as history, physical examination, imaging, and laboratory results.”

The test could be used to triage patients from primary care to rheumatologist care, they suggested.

The study was financially supported by Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

 

A short course of prednisolone may help rheumatologists differentiate between patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis, a proof of concept study shows.

Dr. Uta Kiltz
“The basic idea is that RA is due to inflammation, whereas OA [osteoarthritis] is either not based on the same pathophysiology, or at least not to the same degree,” they wrote.

The pilot part of the TryCort study involved 15 patients with confirmed osteoarthritis and 15 with rheumatoid arthritis who were given 1 g of paracetamol (acetaminophen) a day for 5 days, and on days 3-5, they were given a 20-mg dose of prednisolone (Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19:73. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1279-z).

Results showed that the patients with RA had greater improvements in their pain scores (0-10 on a numerical rating scale), compared with OA patients. The mean percentage improvement in pain scores at day 5 was 52.3% in the RA group and 22.0% in the OA group.

The research team considered that a 40% improvement in pain scores was the best choice between sensitivity and specificity regarding a diagnosis of RA.

At this 40% improvement cut-off, the “pred-test” was positive in 11 patients with RA and in four patients with OA (P = .012), with a sensitivity and specificity for a diagnosis of RA of 73.3% for both measures.

In order to validate the test, the researchers enrolled 95 patients with pain in their fingers and hands but without a clear diagnosis. These patients completed the 5-day intervention, and then at week 12 a rheumatologist diagnosed 47 as having RA and 48 were thought to not have RA.

The patients with diagnosed RA had a higher reduction in pain scores during the treatment with prednisolone, compared with patients without RA.

The median percentage of improvement at day 5 was higher in patients with RA than in those without RA (50% [interquartile range, 30%-60%] vs. 20% [IQR, 10%-30%]; P = .001). Overall, 40 of the 95 patients had an improvement of more than 40% in pain levels on day 5, fulfilling the criteria of a positive pred-test.

However, the authors noted that 31 patients with RA had a positive pred-test (77.5%), compared with nine (22.5%) patients without RA (P greater than .001).

The sensitivity of the pred-test for a diagnosis of RA was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.8) and the specificity was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.7-0.9). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.77 and 0.70, respectively.

The authors concluded that the pred-test “performed well” but not “perfectly well.”

“We are aware that the pred-test without confirmation of other surrogate markers is not helpful in clinical decision-making processes,” they said. “We, therefore, recommend use of the test in light of other confirming factors, such as history, physical examination, imaging, and laboratory results.”

The test could be used to triage patients from primary care to rheumatologist care, they suggested.

The study was financially supported by Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A 3-day course of prednisolone may help clinicians to decide if patients have RA, but the test should not be used in isolation of other surrogate markers.

Major finding: The sensitivity of the pred-test for a diagnosis of RA was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.5-0.8) and the specificity was 0.8 (95% CI, 0.7-0.9).

Data source: A pilot study of 20 mg of prednisolone for 3 days in 30 patients with established RA or OA followed by a validation study of the test in 95 patients with pain in their fingers and hands but without a clear diagnosis.

Disclosures: The study was financially supported by Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Orbital, over rotational, atherectomy holds survival edge in elderly, obese

Article Type
Changed

 

– Orbital atherectomy (OA) was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality than rotational atherectomy (RA) in female, obese, and elderly study groups, according to data from a prospective observational study.

 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Orbital atherectomy (OA) was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality than rotational atherectomy (RA) in female, obese, and elderly study groups, according to data from a prospective observational study.

 

 

 

– Orbital atherectomy (OA) was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality than rotational atherectomy (RA) in female, obese, and elderly study groups, according to data from a prospective observational study.

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT CRT 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Orbital atherectomy was associated with better survival than rotational atherectomy in elderly and obese patients requiring percutaneous interventions.

Major finding: In-hospital mortality was significantly lower after orbital atherectomy, compared with rotational atherectomy, in both the elderly (0% vs. 1.55%; P = .034) and the obese (0% vs. 3.05%; P = .004).

Data source: A nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter study.

Disclosures: Dr. Shlofmitz reported no financial relationships to disclose.

Risankizumab tops ustekinumab in phase II psoriasis trial

Article Type
Changed

 

At 12 weeks, 77% of psoriasis patients treated with risankizumab showed a 90% or greater reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, compared with 40% of ustekinumab patients, in a phase II randomized trial.

The results were published April 19 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Ustekinumab (Stelara), approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2009, blocks interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 and has demonstrated effectiveness in psoriasis patients. However, the humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody risankizumab goes farther and “selectively inhibits interleukin-23 by specifically targeting p19,” wrote Kim A. Papp, MD, PhD, of K. Papp Clinical Research and Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, Ont., and associates (N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1551-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607017).

To compare clinical response and safety, the researchers enrolled 166 adults aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, in the phase II study. Patients were randomized to subcutaneous injections of risankizumab at one of three doses, or ustekinumab at one of two doses. Risankizumab patients received a single 18-mg dose at week 0, or 90-mg or 180-mg doses at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Ustekinumab patients weighing 100 kg or less received 45 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16; those weighing more than 100 kg received 90 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Demographics were similar among the treatment groups.

The primary end point was a 90% or greater reduction in the PASI score at week 12, compared with baseline.

In pooled results of the risankizumab 90-mg and 180-mg groups, 77% of patients achieved a PASI 90 at 12 weeks (73% of the 90-mg group and 81% of the 180-mg group), vs. 40% of ustekinumab patients (P less than .001). Complete clearance of lesions (PASI 100) occurred among risankizumab patients in 14% of the 18-mg group, 41% of the 90-mg group, and 48% of the 180-mg group, compared with 18% of the ustekinumab group.

Among risankizumab patients, the rates of adverse events through 48 weeks were 81% in the 180-mg group, 80% in the 90-mg group, and 69% in the 180-mg group, compared with 72% in those on ustekinumab, with nasopharyngitis the most commonly reported adverse event in all the treatment groups. The rates of serious adverse events were 12% and 15% among those in the 18-mg and 90-mg risankizumab groups, respectively; 0% among those on the 180-mg dose, and 8% among those on ustekinumab.

The study was not large or long enough to provide conclusive safety data on risankizumab, and additional studies are needed to review psoriasis lesions over a longer time period and include both placebo and active comparators, researchers noted. However, the results suggest that “the selective blockade of interleukin-23 through the inhibition of the p19 subunit rather than p40 provides a more complete inhibition of interleukin-23 activity, potentially resulting in a greater efficacy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis at the doses used,” they said.

The study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. Several study coauthors, including lead author Dr. Papp, disclosed relationships with Boehringer Ingelheim and other companies. Several authors are Boehringer Ingelheim employees.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

At 12 weeks, 77% of psoriasis patients treated with risankizumab showed a 90% or greater reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, compared with 40% of ustekinumab patients, in a phase II randomized trial.

The results were published April 19 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Ustekinumab (Stelara), approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2009, blocks interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 and has demonstrated effectiveness in psoriasis patients. However, the humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody risankizumab goes farther and “selectively inhibits interleukin-23 by specifically targeting p19,” wrote Kim A. Papp, MD, PhD, of K. Papp Clinical Research and Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, Ont., and associates (N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1551-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607017).

To compare clinical response and safety, the researchers enrolled 166 adults aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, in the phase II study. Patients were randomized to subcutaneous injections of risankizumab at one of three doses, or ustekinumab at one of two doses. Risankizumab patients received a single 18-mg dose at week 0, or 90-mg or 180-mg doses at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Ustekinumab patients weighing 100 kg or less received 45 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16; those weighing more than 100 kg received 90 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Demographics were similar among the treatment groups.

The primary end point was a 90% or greater reduction in the PASI score at week 12, compared with baseline.

In pooled results of the risankizumab 90-mg and 180-mg groups, 77% of patients achieved a PASI 90 at 12 weeks (73% of the 90-mg group and 81% of the 180-mg group), vs. 40% of ustekinumab patients (P less than .001). Complete clearance of lesions (PASI 100) occurred among risankizumab patients in 14% of the 18-mg group, 41% of the 90-mg group, and 48% of the 180-mg group, compared with 18% of the ustekinumab group.

Among risankizumab patients, the rates of adverse events through 48 weeks were 81% in the 180-mg group, 80% in the 90-mg group, and 69% in the 180-mg group, compared with 72% in those on ustekinumab, with nasopharyngitis the most commonly reported adverse event in all the treatment groups. The rates of serious adverse events were 12% and 15% among those in the 18-mg and 90-mg risankizumab groups, respectively; 0% among those on the 180-mg dose, and 8% among those on ustekinumab.

The study was not large or long enough to provide conclusive safety data on risankizumab, and additional studies are needed to review psoriasis lesions over a longer time period and include both placebo and active comparators, researchers noted. However, the results suggest that “the selective blockade of interleukin-23 through the inhibition of the p19 subunit rather than p40 provides a more complete inhibition of interleukin-23 activity, potentially resulting in a greater efficacy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis at the doses used,” they said.

The study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. Several study coauthors, including lead author Dr. Papp, disclosed relationships with Boehringer Ingelheim and other companies. Several authors are Boehringer Ingelheim employees.
 

 

At 12 weeks, 77% of psoriasis patients treated with risankizumab showed a 90% or greater reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, compared with 40% of ustekinumab patients, in a phase II randomized trial.

The results were published April 19 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Ustekinumab (Stelara), approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2009, blocks interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 and has demonstrated effectiveness in psoriasis patients. However, the humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody risankizumab goes farther and “selectively inhibits interleukin-23 by specifically targeting p19,” wrote Kim A. Papp, MD, PhD, of K. Papp Clinical Research and Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, Ont., and associates (N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;376:1551-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607017).

To compare clinical response and safety, the researchers enrolled 166 adults aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, in the phase II study. Patients were randomized to subcutaneous injections of risankizumab at one of three doses, or ustekinumab at one of two doses. Risankizumab patients received a single 18-mg dose at week 0, or 90-mg or 180-mg doses at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Ustekinumab patients weighing 100 kg or less received 45 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16; those weighing more than 100 kg received 90 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 16. Demographics were similar among the treatment groups.

The primary end point was a 90% or greater reduction in the PASI score at week 12, compared with baseline.

In pooled results of the risankizumab 90-mg and 180-mg groups, 77% of patients achieved a PASI 90 at 12 weeks (73% of the 90-mg group and 81% of the 180-mg group), vs. 40% of ustekinumab patients (P less than .001). Complete clearance of lesions (PASI 100) occurred among risankizumab patients in 14% of the 18-mg group, 41% of the 90-mg group, and 48% of the 180-mg group, compared with 18% of the ustekinumab group.

Among risankizumab patients, the rates of adverse events through 48 weeks were 81% in the 180-mg group, 80% in the 90-mg group, and 69% in the 180-mg group, compared with 72% in those on ustekinumab, with nasopharyngitis the most commonly reported adverse event in all the treatment groups. The rates of serious adverse events were 12% and 15% among those in the 18-mg and 90-mg risankizumab groups, respectively; 0% among those on the 180-mg dose, and 8% among those on ustekinumab.

The study was not large or long enough to provide conclusive safety data on risankizumab, and additional studies are needed to review psoriasis lesions over a longer time period and include both placebo and active comparators, researchers noted. However, the results suggest that “the selective blockade of interleukin-23 through the inhibition of the p19 subunit rather than p40 provides a more complete inhibition of interleukin-23 activity, potentially resulting in a greater efficacy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis at the doses used,” they said.

The study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. Several study coauthors, including lead author Dr. Papp, disclosed relationships with Boehringer Ingelheim and other companies. Several authors are Boehringer Ingelheim employees.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Clinical responses in psoriasis patients treated with risankizumab were superior to responses in patients treated with ustekinumab.

Major finding: At 12 weeks, 77% of risankizumab patients showed a 90% or greater reduction in PASI score, compared with 40% of ustekinumab patients.

Data source: A phase II randomized trial of 166 adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. Several study coauthors, including lead author Dr. Papp, disclosed relationships with Boehringer Ingelheim and other companies; several were employees of Boehringer.

Congenital melanocytic nevi in the very young tend to be benign

Article Type
Changed

 

Histopathology findings of cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread are common in congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) of all sizes in children aged 0-35 months, and tend to have benign outcomes, according to a retrospective study.

Emily A. Simons, MPH, and her associates at Boston Children’s Hospital studied 197 nevi in 179 patients with an average age of 14 months (range, 4 days to 35 months); 51% were female. Of those, 80% had skin types I-II, and 90% were white. The majority of the lesions involved the head or trunk and were predominantly medium in size, and 58% had a projected adult size of 1.5-10 cm. The study was retrospective; cases had been diagnosed between 1993 and 2013.

Cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread were the most frequent features – they were present in 73% of nevi and were closely associated. Combined histologic patterns of a blue nevus, spindle and Spitz nevus, or a deep penetrating nevus were identified in 40% of CMN. Proliferative nodules occurred in 5% of nevi.

Clinical outcomes were available for 130 patients, including 26 with large CMN and 8 with proliferative nodules. The children were alive and had not been diagnosed with melanoma at a mean follow-up of a mean of 8.4 years (range, 7 months to 21.3 years), even though margins of the last excision were positive in 41% of all CMN and in 77% of large CMN.

Malignant transformation of CMN certainly should be recognized, but the morbidity of overdiagnosis also needs to be considered. “Excision of larger CMN might require serial excisions under general anesthesia, the use of tissue expanders, and grafts,” Dr. Simons and her associates said.

Among the limitations of this study were that the majority of patients were white, so the results may not translate to children with darker skin types, they noted.

“The diagnosis of malignant melanoma should be made with great caution in this population,” they concluded, pointing out that the histopathologic features alone (cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread) “should not be interpreted as evidence for potential malignant behavior or serve as grounds for further excision.”

Read more in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2017 May;76[5]941-7).

The authors had no relevant financial disorders.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Histopathology findings of cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread are common in congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) of all sizes in children aged 0-35 months, and tend to have benign outcomes, according to a retrospective study.

Emily A. Simons, MPH, and her associates at Boston Children’s Hospital studied 197 nevi in 179 patients with an average age of 14 months (range, 4 days to 35 months); 51% were female. Of those, 80% had skin types I-II, and 90% were white. The majority of the lesions involved the head or trunk and were predominantly medium in size, and 58% had a projected adult size of 1.5-10 cm. The study was retrospective; cases had been diagnosed between 1993 and 2013.

Cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread were the most frequent features – they were present in 73% of nevi and were closely associated. Combined histologic patterns of a blue nevus, spindle and Spitz nevus, or a deep penetrating nevus were identified in 40% of CMN. Proliferative nodules occurred in 5% of nevi.

Clinical outcomes were available for 130 patients, including 26 with large CMN and 8 with proliferative nodules. The children were alive and had not been diagnosed with melanoma at a mean follow-up of a mean of 8.4 years (range, 7 months to 21.3 years), even though margins of the last excision were positive in 41% of all CMN and in 77% of large CMN.

Malignant transformation of CMN certainly should be recognized, but the morbidity of overdiagnosis also needs to be considered. “Excision of larger CMN might require serial excisions under general anesthesia, the use of tissue expanders, and grafts,” Dr. Simons and her associates said.

Among the limitations of this study were that the majority of patients were white, so the results may not translate to children with darker skin types, they noted.

“The diagnosis of malignant melanoma should be made with great caution in this population,” they concluded, pointing out that the histopathologic features alone (cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread) “should not be interpreted as evidence for potential malignant behavior or serve as grounds for further excision.”

Read more in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2017 May;76[5]941-7).

The authors had no relevant financial disorders.

 

Histopathology findings of cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread are common in congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) of all sizes in children aged 0-35 months, and tend to have benign outcomes, according to a retrospective study.

Emily A. Simons, MPH, and her associates at Boston Children’s Hospital studied 197 nevi in 179 patients with an average age of 14 months (range, 4 days to 35 months); 51% were female. Of those, 80% had skin types I-II, and 90% were white. The majority of the lesions involved the head or trunk and were predominantly medium in size, and 58% had a projected adult size of 1.5-10 cm. The study was retrospective; cases had been diagnosed between 1993 and 2013.

Cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread were the most frequent features – they were present in 73% of nevi and were closely associated. Combined histologic patterns of a blue nevus, spindle and Spitz nevus, or a deep penetrating nevus were identified in 40% of CMN. Proliferative nodules occurred in 5% of nevi.

Clinical outcomes were available for 130 patients, including 26 with large CMN and 8 with proliferative nodules. The children were alive and had not been diagnosed with melanoma at a mean follow-up of a mean of 8.4 years (range, 7 months to 21.3 years), even though margins of the last excision were positive in 41% of all CMN and in 77% of large CMN.

Malignant transformation of CMN certainly should be recognized, but the morbidity of overdiagnosis also needs to be considered. “Excision of larger CMN might require serial excisions under general anesthesia, the use of tissue expanders, and grafts,” Dr. Simons and her associates said.

Among the limitations of this study were that the majority of patients were white, so the results may not translate to children with darker skin types, they noted.

“The diagnosis of malignant melanoma should be made with great caution in this population,” they concluded, pointing out that the histopathologic features alone (cytologic atypia, architectural disorder, and pagetoid spread) “should not be interpreted as evidence for potential malignant behavior or serve as grounds for further excision.”

Read more in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (2017 May;76[5]941-7).

The authors had no relevant financial disorders.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

No Link Found Between Spike Frequency and Surgical Outcomes

Article Type
Changed
Spiking did not predict postsurgical seizures in TLE.

An increase in spike frequency does not help clinicians predict the outcome of surgery in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. To reach that conclusion, researchers used scalp video monitoring data from patients who had anterior temporal lobe epilepsy to look for interictal epileptiform abnormalities, comparing patients with more than 60 spikes/hour to those with fewer spikes. They found no significant differences in seizure outcomes among patients who had undergone anterior temporal lobectomy.

Ngo L, Sperling MR, Skidmore C, Mintzer S, Nei M. Absolute spike frequency as a predictor of surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy. Seizure. 2017;47:83-86.

Publications
Sections
Spiking did not predict postsurgical seizures in TLE.
Spiking did not predict postsurgical seizures in TLE.

An increase in spike frequency does not help clinicians predict the outcome of surgery in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. To reach that conclusion, researchers used scalp video monitoring data from patients who had anterior temporal lobe epilepsy to look for interictal epileptiform abnormalities, comparing patients with more than 60 spikes/hour to those with fewer spikes. They found no significant differences in seizure outcomes among patients who had undergone anterior temporal lobectomy.

Ngo L, Sperling MR, Skidmore C, Mintzer S, Nei M. Absolute spike frequency as a predictor of surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy. Seizure. 2017;47:83-86.

An increase in spike frequency does not help clinicians predict the outcome of surgery in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. To reach that conclusion, researchers used scalp video monitoring data from patients who had anterior temporal lobe epilepsy to look for interictal epileptiform abnormalities, comparing patients with more than 60 spikes/hour to those with fewer spikes. They found no significant differences in seizure outcomes among patients who had undergone anterior temporal lobectomy.

Ngo L, Sperling MR, Skidmore C, Mintzer S, Nei M. Absolute spike frequency as a predictor of surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy. Seizure. 2017;47:83-86.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Patients With Refractory Focal Epilepsy Have Older Brains

Article Type
Changed
MRIs suggest their predicted brain age is older than chronological age.

Patients with refractory focal epilepsy seem to have older brains, suggests a study that used whole brain T1-weighted MRI scans to estimate the predicted brain age versus chronological age. On average, the difference between predicted brain age and chronological age in patients with refractory focal epilepsy was 4.5 years greater than the researchers observed in healthy adults. The researchers also found that an earlier onset of refractory focal epilepsy was linked to increased brain age.

Pardoe H, Cole JH, Blackmon K ,et al. Structural brain changes in medically refractory focal epilepsy resemble premature brain aging. Epilepsy Res. 2017;133:28-32.

Publications
Sections
MRIs suggest their predicted brain age is older than chronological age.
MRIs suggest their predicted brain age is older than chronological age.

Patients with refractory focal epilepsy seem to have older brains, suggests a study that used whole brain T1-weighted MRI scans to estimate the predicted brain age versus chronological age. On average, the difference between predicted brain age and chronological age in patients with refractory focal epilepsy was 4.5 years greater than the researchers observed in healthy adults. The researchers also found that an earlier onset of refractory focal epilepsy was linked to increased brain age.

Pardoe H, Cole JH, Blackmon K ,et al. Structural brain changes in medically refractory focal epilepsy resemble premature brain aging. Epilepsy Res. 2017;133:28-32.

Patients with refractory focal epilepsy seem to have older brains, suggests a study that used whole brain T1-weighted MRI scans to estimate the predicted brain age versus chronological age. On average, the difference between predicted brain age and chronological age in patients with refractory focal epilepsy was 4.5 years greater than the researchers observed in healthy adults. The researchers also found that an earlier onset of refractory focal epilepsy was linked to increased brain age.

Pardoe H, Cole JH, Blackmon K ,et al. Structural brain changes in medically refractory focal epilepsy resemble premature brain aging. Epilepsy Res. 2017;133:28-32.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Infliximab safe for recently vaccinated Kawasaki patients

Article Type
Changed

 

Infliximab is safe to use in infants and young children with Kawasaki disease (KD) who have recently received live viral vaccinations, reported Aaron M. Lee, MS, and his associates at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego.

The study included 38 children, aged either less than 18 months or 4-6 years, who received either a 5 mg/kg or a 10 mg/kg dose of infliximab within 90 days of receiving a live vaccination of MMR, varicella-zoster virus, or rotavirus. During a 90-day follow-up period, no serious infections requiring antimicrobial therapy or hospitalization were reported. A single patient who received an MMR/VZV vaccine 42 days before infliximab treatment developed urticaria 15 minutes after the infliximab transfusion began, which was resolved with hydroxyzine.

“The data presented here suggest that a single dose of infliximab can be safely administered to acute KD patients regardless of recent live virus vaccination,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full report in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (2017 Apr;36(4):435-7).

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Infliximab is safe to use in infants and young children with Kawasaki disease (KD) who have recently received live viral vaccinations, reported Aaron M. Lee, MS, and his associates at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego.

The study included 38 children, aged either less than 18 months or 4-6 years, who received either a 5 mg/kg or a 10 mg/kg dose of infliximab within 90 days of receiving a live vaccination of MMR, varicella-zoster virus, or rotavirus. During a 90-day follow-up period, no serious infections requiring antimicrobial therapy or hospitalization were reported. A single patient who received an MMR/VZV vaccine 42 days before infliximab treatment developed urticaria 15 minutes after the infliximab transfusion began, which was resolved with hydroxyzine.

“The data presented here suggest that a single dose of infliximab can be safely administered to acute KD patients regardless of recent live virus vaccination,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full report in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (2017 Apr;36(4):435-7).

 

Infliximab is safe to use in infants and young children with Kawasaki disease (KD) who have recently received live viral vaccinations, reported Aaron M. Lee, MS, and his associates at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego.

The study included 38 children, aged either less than 18 months or 4-6 years, who received either a 5 mg/kg or a 10 mg/kg dose of infliximab within 90 days of receiving a live vaccination of MMR, varicella-zoster virus, or rotavirus. During a 90-day follow-up period, no serious infections requiring antimicrobial therapy or hospitalization were reported. A single patient who received an MMR/VZV vaccine 42 days before infliximab treatment developed urticaria 15 minutes after the infliximab transfusion began, which was resolved with hydroxyzine.

“The data presented here suggest that a single dose of infliximab can be safely administered to acute KD patients regardless of recent live virus vaccination,” the investigators concluded.

Find the full report in the Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (2017 Apr;36(4):435-7).

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

The Risk of Seizures Following Stroke

Article Type
Changed
Nearly 5% of patients with ischemic stroke experience a seizure, many within first 24 hours.

About 5% of patients who have had an ischemic stroke develop seizures, according to an analysis of data from the Framingham Heart Study. When researchers looked at the incidence of strokes between 1982 and 2003 and followed patients for 20 years, they found strokes had occurred in 469 patients, 25 of whom had experienced a seizure (5.3%). A third of these seizures happened within the first 24 hours of the stroke onset; half occurred within 30 days.

Stefanidou M, Das RR, Beiser AS, et al. Incidence of seizures following initial ischemic stroke in a community-based cohort: The Framingham Heart Study. Seizure. 2017;47:105-110.

Publications
Sections
Nearly 5% of patients with ischemic stroke experience a seizure, many within first 24 hours.
Nearly 5% of patients with ischemic stroke experience a seizure, many within first 24 hours.

About 5% of patients who have had an ischemic stroke develop seizures, according to an analysis of data from the Framingham Heart Study. When researchers looked at the incidence of strokes between 1982 and 2003 and followed patients for 20 years, they found strokes had occurred in 469 patients, 25 of whom had experienced a seizure (5.3%). A third of these seizures happened within the first 24 hours of the stroke onset; half occurred within 30 days.

Stefanidou M, Das RR, Beiser AS, et al. Incidence of seizures following initial ischemic stroke in a community-based cohort: The Framingham Heart Study. Seizure. 2017;47:105-110.

About 5% of patients who have had an ischemic stroke develop seizures, according to an analysis of data from the Framingham Heart Study. When researchers looked at the incidence of strokes between 1982 and 2003 and followed patients for 20 years, they found strokes had occurred in 469 patients, 25 of whom had experienced a seizure (5.3%). A third of these seizures happened within the first 24 hours of the stroke onset; half occurred within 30 days.

Stefanidou M, Das RR, Beiser AS, et al. Incidence of seizures following initial ischemic stroke in a community-based cohort: The Framingham Heart Study. Seizure. 2017;47:105-110.

Publications
Publications
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Clearer heads are a fuzzy subject

Article Type
Changed

 

Those of you who were in high school or middle school in 1987, when the DSM II-R first included “Attention Deficit Disorder With and Without Hyperactivity” for the first time, missed out on the “discovery,” and subsequent commercialization, of a condition that had been percolating under physicians’ noses for hundreds of years.

You may have wondered what primary care physicians did with their time before they were inundated with requests for evaluations and medications to treat ADHD. You may not realize that we didn’t always have ADHD specialists to help us or several dozen stimulant concoctions from which to choose. In the beginning, ADHD specialists had to invent themselves while the pharmaceutical companies scrambled to meet the demand for drugs that were longer lasting and more palatable.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff
Don’t worry that you missed out on the birth of a medical phenomena. You and your fellow physicians are fortunate to have front row seats to watch the discovery and commercialization process repeat itself as the field of concussion management struggles with its own growing pains. Just like ADHD, concussions always have been there. We’ve just lowered the bar on their diagnosis and wondered, with more concern, whether we have been managing them correctly.

The increasing popularity of professional contact sports is probably what we have to thank for sharpening this focus on head injury. I suspect that, for the general population, there are no more concussions occurring today than there were 50 years ago. However, in the subgroup of professional and elite college athletes, the players’ increasing speed, size, and flagrant ignorance of the rules have resulted in more significant head injuries. When a highly paid megastar athlete must sit out key games, the management of his head injury generates a lot of attention and discussion.

I am sure that there also has been an increase in concussions among young women who now have more opportunities to participate in contact sports. However, I suspect that most of the apparent increase in the diagnosis among high school and younger athletes of both sexes is primarily the result of heightened awareness. I don’t know of data to support or refute this opinion.

I may be wrong about lack of a real increase in concussion injuries, but there can be no arguing about the explosion in the number of clinics and providers who advertise themselves as concussion specialists. Neurologists, psychologists, chiropractors, orthopedists, and sports medicine practitioners and trainers all have climbed on the bandwagon to satisfy the demand generated by this country’s new concussion awareness.

The problem is that, just as in the early days after the “discovery” of ADHD, the science behind much of the advice and management strategies for concussion just isn’t there. For example, resting the brain after a head injury sounds like a good idea. After all, it works for a torn hamstring. However, “sounds like” and “is” are two very different things.

In an excellent article in this publication (“Spotlight shifts to active treatment for concussions,” by Christine Kilgore), I found some comforting news that concussion management may be taking some baby steps into the realm of evidence-based decision management. The original results came from a pediatric population, but it now appears that prolonged rest, which is routinely recommended, can be counterproductive in many concussed patients. The physicians quoted in this article suggest that their experience is pointing to the need for active management in patients with a variety of postconcussion symptoms. Brian Hainline, MD, a clinical professor of neurology at New York University and Indiana University, Indianapolis, observes, “It’s rare that prolonged rest is the answer. Look at stroke – you don’t have patients resting indefinitely. You have to get their nervous systems re-engaged.”

Of course, the science is still lagging behind and the observations by the physicians quoted in this article are based on small series, but their agreement deserves our attention. I urge you to take a look at this article to get an idea of where the management of concussion appears to be going. Not surprisingly, no two concussion patients are the same, and their management should be tailored to their needs. Reliance on overly simplistic guidelines not only doesn’t work but can do harm. It’s that old Hippocratic Oath thing again.

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Those of you who were in high school or middle school in 1987, when the DSM II-R first included “Attention Deficit Disorder With and Without Hyperactivity” for the first time, missed out on the “discovery,” and subsequent commercialization, of a condition that had been percolating under physicians’ noses for hundreds of years.

You may have wondered what primary care physicians did with their time before they were inundated with requests for evaluations and medications to treat ADHD. You may not realize that we didn’t always have ADHD specialists to help us or several dozen stimulant concoctions from which to choose. In the beginning, ADHD specialists had to invent themselves while the pharmaceutical companies scrambled to meet the demand for drugs that were longer lasting and more palatable.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff
Don’t worry that you missed out on the birth of a medical phenomena. You and your fellow physicians are fortunate to have front row seats to watch the discovery and commercialization process repeat itself as the field of concussion management struggles with its own growing pains. Just like ADHD, concussions always have been there. We’ve just lowered the bar on their diagnosis and wondered, with more concern, whether we have been managing them correctly.

The increasing popularity of professional contact sports is probably what we have to thank for sharpening this focus on head injury. I suspect that, for the general population, there are no more concussions occurring today than there were 50 years ago. However, in the subgroup of professional and elite college athletes, the players’ increasing speed, size, and flagrant ignorance of the rules have resulted in more significant head injuries. When a highly paid megastar athlete must sit out key games, the management of his head injury generates a lot of attention and discussion.

I am sure that there also has been an increase in concussions among young women who now have more opportunities to participate in contact sports. However, I suspect that most of the apparent increase in the diagnosis among high school and younger athletes of both sexes is primarily the result of heightened awareness. I don’t know of data to support or refute this opinion.

I may be wrong about lack of a real increase in concussion injuries, but there can be no arguing about the explosion in the number of clinics and providers who advertise themselves as concussion specialists. Neurologists, psychologists, chiropractors, orthopedists, and sports medicine practitioners and trainers all have climbed on the bandwagon to satisfy the demand generated by this country’s new concussion awareness.

The problem is that, just as in the early days after the “discovery” of ADHD, the science behind much of the advice and management strategies for concussion just isn’t there. For example, resting the brain after a head injury sounds like a good idea. After all, it works for a torn hamstring. However, “sounds like” and “is” are two very different things.

In an excellent article in this publication (“Spotlight shifts to active treatment for concussions,” by Christine Kilgore), I found some comforting news that concussion management may be taking some baby steps into the realm of evidence-based decision management. The original results came from a pediatric population, but it now appears that prolonged rest, which is routinely recommended, can be counterproductive in many concussed patients. The physicians quoted in this article suggest that their experience is pointing to the need for active management in patients with a variety of postconcussion symptoms. Brian Hainline, MD, a clinical professor of neurology at New York University and Indiana University, Indianapolis, observes, “It’s rare that prolonged rest is the answer. Look at stroke – you don’t have patients resting indefinitely. You have to get their nervous systems re-engaged.”

Of course, the science is still lagging behind and the observations by the physicians quoted in this article are based on small series, but their agreement deserves our attention. I urge you to take a look at this article to get an idea of where the management of concussion appears to be going. Not surprisingly, no two concussion patients are the same, and their management should be tailored to their needs. Reliance on overly simplistic guidelines not only doesn’t work but can do harm. It’s that old Hippocratic Oath thing again.

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

 

Those of you who were in high school or middle school in 1987, when the DSM II-R first included “Attention Deficit Disorder With and Without Hyperactivity” for the first time, missed out on the “discovery,” and subsequent commercialization, of a condition that had been percolating under physicians’ noses for hundreds of years.

You may have wondered what primary care physicians did with their time before they were inundated with requests for evaluations and medications to treat ADHD. You may not realize that we didn’t always have ADHD specialists to help us or several dozen stimulant concoctions from which to choose. In the beginning, ADHD specialists had to invent themselves while the pharmaceutical companies scrambled to meet the demand for drugs that were longer lasting and more palatable.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff
Don’t worry that you missed out on the birth of a medical phenomena. You and your fellow physicians are fortunate to have front row seats to watch the discovery and commercialization process repeat itself as the field of concussion management struggles with its own growing pains. Just like ADHD, concussions always have been there. We’ve just lowered the bar on their diagnosis and wondered, with more concern, whether we have been managing them correctly.

The increasing popularity of professional contact sports is probably what we have to thank for sharpening this focus on head injury. I suspect that, for the general population, there are no more concussions occurring today than there were 50 years ago. However, in the subgroup of professional and elite college athletes, the players’ increasing speed, size, and flagrant ignorance of the rules have resulted in more significant head injuries. When a highly paid megastar athlete must sit out key games, the management of his head injury generates a lot of attention and discussion.

I am sure that there also has been an increase in concussions among young women who now have more opportunities to participate in contact sports. However, I suspect that most of the apparent increase in the diagnosis among high school and younger athletes of both sexes is primarily the result of heightened awareness. I don’t know of data to support or refute this opinion.

I may be wrong about lack of a real increase in concussion injuries, but there can be no arguing about the explosion in the number of clinics and providers who advertise themselves as concussion specialists. Neurologists, psychologists, chiropractors, orthopedists, and sports medicine practitioners and trainers all have climbed on the bandwagon to satisfy the demand generated by this country’s new concussion awareness.

The problem is that, just as in the early days after the “discovery” of ADHD, the science behind much of the advice and management strategies for concussion just isn’t there. For example, resting the brain after a head injury sounds like a good idea. After all, it works for a torn hamstring. However, “sounds like” and “is” are two very different things.

In an excellent article in this publication (“Spotlight shifts to active treatment for concussions,” by Christine Kilgore), I found some comforting news that concussion management may be taking some baby steps into the realm of evidence-based decision management. The original results came from a pediatric population, but it now appears that prolonged rest, which is routinely recommended, can be counterproductive in many concussed patients. The physicians quoted in this article suggest that their experience is pointing to the need for active management in patients with a variety of postconcussion symptoms. Brian Hainline, MD, a clinical professor of neurology at New York University and Indiana University, Indianapolis, observes, “It’s rare that prolonged rest is the answer. Look at stroke – you don’t have patients resting indefinitely. You have to get their nervous systems re-engaged.”

Of course, the science is still lagging behind and the observations by the physicians quoted in this article are based on small series, but their agreement deserves our attention. I urge you to take a look at this article to get an idea of where the management of concussion appears to be going. Not surprisingly, no two concussion patients are the same, and their management should be tailored to their needs. Reliance on overly simplistic guidelines not only doesn’t work but can do harm. It’s that old Hippocratic Oath thing again.

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME

Fat City

Article Type
Changed


“Honey, does this town make me look fat?”

“Yes, Dear, I’m afraid it does.”

No, that really wasn’t a typo in the first line. I intended to type “town” and not “gown.” A recent article by Dionysus Powell in healthcareinamerica.us has prompted me to think a bit more about the relationship between obesity and the communities we inhabit (“Fit Cities vs. Fat Cities – What available data can tell us about the difference in lifestyle and obesity between cities,” by Dionysus Powell, March 28, 2017). The author is a biotech researcher who has collected readily available Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data on body mass index (BMI) and self-reported sedentary behavior in almost 200 U.S. cities. He then sliced and diced these numbers with each cities’ walkability score, which is a crude measure of how easily citizens and visitors on foot can reach a variety of destinations such as shops, schools, churches, libraries, and municipal offices. You can easily find your own town’s score by going to walkscore.com.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff
He then resliced and -diced those numbers with CDC data on health outcomes and ethnic diversity, and resorted using meteorologic data on humidity and temperature using a multivariate analysis technique called multiple linear regression. The article is illustrated with one map and six scatter graphs.

Not surprisingly, the author discovered that “differences in obesity rates between cities can largely be explained by differences in physical activity.” Of course, there is a point at which a community has sufficient walkable infrastructure so that its obesity rate is a result of the citizens choosing not to walk rather than the community’s failure to provide pedestrians with enough connectivity to do their daily errands on foot. That threshold point appears to be a walkability score of 50, yet Mr. Powell observes that most American cities fail to reach even that minimum.

Although rich people tend to have better health outcomes than poor people, and there is a “general trend for richer cities to be more physically active than poorer cities,” Mr. Powell could not find a relationship between a city’s median income and its walkability.

If, like most of us, you have been frustrated in your efforts to lower the BMI of your patients, it may be time to emerge from the confines of your office and take a look at your town’s walkability score. If it is less than 50, you and your fellow concerned citizens and officials have some work to do. It may mean advocating for improved pedestrian infrastructure and/or dismantling the physical and zoning barriers to pedestrian connectivity. For example, maybe your community should be adding more pedestrian-activated crossing signals or tapping into federal and state safe routes to school programs or adopting zoning ordinances that require sidewalks in all new developments.

Here in Brunswick, we have a very enviable walkability score of 87, meaning “most errands can be accomplished on foot.” We have a bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee that reports to the town council and works with the town engineer to advocate for infrastructure improvements that encourage pedestrian connectivity. However, funding these improvements in walkability is always a challenge. But as the analysis in this recent study suggestions, our biggest challenge continues to be encouraging our citizens to take advantage of our existing pedestrian infrastructure.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

Publications
Topics
Sections


“Honey, does this town make me look fat?”

“Yes, Dear, I’m afraid it does.”

No, that really wasn’t a typo in the first line. I intended to type “town” and not “gown.” A recent article by Dionysus Powell in healthcareinamerica.us has prompted me to think a bit more about the relationship between obesity and the communities we inhabit (“Fit Cities vs. Fat Cities – What available data can tell us about the difference in lifestyle and obesity between cities,” by Dionysus Powell, March 28, 2017). The author is a biotech researcher who has collected readily available Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data on body mass index (BMI) and self-reported sedentary behavior in almost 200 U.S. cities. He then sliced and diced these numbers with each cities’ walkability score, which is a crude measure of how easily citizens and visitors on foot can reach a variety of destinations such as shops, schools, churches, libraries, and municipal offices. You can easily find your own town’s score by going to walkscore.com.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff
He then resliced and -diced those numbers with CDC data on health outcomes and ethnic diversity, and resorted using meteorologic data on humidity and temperature using a multivariate analysis technique called multiple linear regression. The article is illustrated with one map and six scatter graphs.

Not surprisingly, the author discovered that “differences in obesity rates between cities can largely be explained by differences in physical activity.” Of course, there is a point at which a community has sufficient walkable infrastructure so that its obesity rate is a result of the citizens choosing not to walk rather than the community’s failure to provide pedestrians with enough connectivity to do their daily errands on foot. That threshold point appears to be a walkability score of 50, yet Mr. Powell observes that most American cities fail to reach even that minimum.

Although rich people tend to have better health outcomes than poor people, and there is a “general trend for richer cities to be more physically active than poorer cities,” Mr. Powell could not find a relationship between a city’s median income and its walkability.

If, like most of us, you have been frustrated in your efforts to lower the BMI of your patients, it may be time to emerge from the confines of your office and take a look at your town’s walkability score. If it is less than 50, you and your fellow concerned citizens and officials have some work to do. It may mean advocating for improved pedestrian infrastructure and/or dismantling the physical and zoning barriers to pedestrian connectivity. For example, maybe your community should be adding more pedestrian-activated crossing signals or tapping into federal and state safe routes to school programs or adopting zoning ordinances that require sidewalks in all new developments.

Here in Brunswick, we have a very enviable walkability score of 87, meaning “most errands can be accomplished on foot.” We have a bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee that reports to the town council and works with the town engineer to advocate for infrastructure improvements that encourage pedestrian connectivity. However, funding these improvements in walkability is always a challenge. But as the analysis in this recent study suggestions, our biggest challenge continues to be encouraging our citizens to take advantage of our existing pedestrian infrastructure.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].


“Honey, does this town make me look fat?”

“Yes, Dear, I’m afraid it does.”

No, that really wasn’t a typo in the first line. I intended to type “town” and not “gown.” A recent article by Dionysus Powell in healthcareinamerica.us has prompted me to think a bit more about the relationship between obesity and the communities we inhabit (“Fit Cities vs. Fat Cities – What available data can tell us about the difference in lifestyle and obesity between cities,” by Dionysus Powell, March 28, 2017). The author is a biotech researcher who has collected readily available Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data on body mass index (BMI) and self-reported sedentary behavior in almost 200 U.S. cities. He then sliced and diced these numbers with each cities’ walkability score, which is a crude measure of how easily citizens and visitors on foot can reach a variety of destinations such as shops, schools, churches, libraries, and municipal offices. You can easily find your own town’s score by going to walkscore.com.

Dr. William G. Wilkoff
He then resliced and -diced those numbers with CDC data on health outcomes and ethnic diversity, and resorted using meteorologic data on humidity and temperature using a multivariate analysis technique called multiple linear regression. The article is illustrated with one map and six scatter graphs.

Not surprisingly, the author discovered that “differences in obesity rates between cities can largely be explained by differences in physical activity.” Of course, there is a point at which a community has sufficient walkable infrastructure so that its obesity rate is a result of the citizens choosing not to walk rather than the community’s failure to provide pedestrians with enough connectivity to do their daily errands on foot. That threshold point appears to be a walkability score of 50, yet Mr. Powell observes that most American cities fail to reach even that minimum.

Although rich people tend to have better health outcomes than poor people, and there is a “general trend for richer cities to be more physically active than poorer cities,” Mr. Powell could not find a relationship between a city’s median income and its walkability.

If, like most of us, you have been frustrated in your efforts to lower the BMI of your patients, it may be time to emerge from the confines of your office and take a look at your town’s walkability score. If it is less than 50, you and your fellow concerned citizens and officials have some work to do. It may mean advocating for improved pedestrian infrastructure and/or dismantling the physical and zoning barriers to pedestrian connectivity. For example, maybe your community should be adding more pedestrian-activated crossing signals or tapping into federal and state safe routes to school programs or adopting zoning ordinances that require sidewalks in all new developments.

Here in Brunswick, we have a very enviable walkability score of 87, meaning “most errands can be accomplished on foot.” We have a bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee that reports to the town council and works with the town engineer to advocate for infrastructure improvements that encourage pedestrian connectivity. However, funding these improvements in walkability is always a challenge. But as the analysis in this recent study suggestions, our biggest challenge continues to be encouraging our citizens to take advantage of our existing pedestrian infrastructure.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME