Statins started in childhood for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia reduced progression of carotid thickening and cut the risk of cardiovascular disease 20 years later, according to authors of a long-term follow-up study.

There were no deaths and one cardiovascular event by the age of 39 years for patients in the observational study who had, as children, participated in a placebo-controlled, 2-year safety and efficacy study of pravastatin.

These positive effects on disease and a disease marker (carotid intima-media thickness) were observed even though only 20% of patients met LDL cholesterol goals, according to study senior authors John J.P. Kastelein, MD, PhD, and Barbara A. Hutten, PhD, of Amsterdam University Medical Centers in the Netherlands, and their colleagues.

“If corroborated, such findings would underscore the current pediatric guidelines, which recommend starting treatment from the age of 8 years or 10 years, with less-stringent targets than those for adults,” the investigators wrote in the report, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study was based in part on follow-up visits with 184 of the original cohort of 214 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in the 2-year pravastatin study, along with 77 of 95 unaffected siblings who had served as a control group in that study.

At the time of the 20-year follow-up, 79% of the familial hypercholesterolemia patients said they were using lipid-lowering medication, the investigators wrote.

The mean LDL cholesterol level at follow-up was 160.7 mg/dL for those with familial hypercholesterolemia, a drop of 32% when compared with the mean LDL cholesterol level at baseline in the original study, according to the investigators. By contrast, LDL cholesterol in the unaffected siblings was 121.9 mg/dL, up 24% from baseline.

Just 37 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, or about 20%, reached the LDL cholesterol treatment target of less than 100 mg/dL, the investigators wrote.

At the start of the original trial, carotid intima-media thickness was greater in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, compared with their unaffected siblings, with a mean difference of 0.012 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.021) after adjustment for age and sex.

Some 20 years later, the mean difference in thickness for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and unaffected siblings, was 0.555 mm and 0.551 mm, respectively, for a mean difference of just 0.008 mm (95% CI, –0.009 to 0.026) after adjustments.

Data on cardiovascular events and deaths for affected parents was collected, as each child in the study had a parent with confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia, the investigators wrote.

A total of 7% of affected parents had died of MI before the age of 40 years, whereas there were no deaths from cardiovascular causes in all 214 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia from the original study.

Similarly, about a quarter of affected parents had a cardiovascular event before age 40, whereas there was only one event recorded in the patients in the study. That event, angina pectoris resulting in percutaneous coronary intervention, occurred in a patient who stopped taking the drug at the end of the trial, the investigators wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the AMC Foundation. The study authors reported disclosures related to numerous pharmaceutical companies and government, nonprofit, or academic entities.

SOURCE: Kastelein JJP et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1547-56.

Statins started in childhood for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia reduced progression of carotid thickening and cut the risk of cardiovascular disease 20 years later, according to authors of a long-term follow-up study.

There were no deaths and one cardiovascular event by the age of 39 years for patients in the observational study who had, as children, participated in a placebo-controlled, 2-year safety and efficacy study of pravastatin.

These positive effects on disease and a disease marker (carotid intima-media thickness) were observed even though only 20% of patients met LDL cholesterol goals, according to study senior authors John J.P. Kastelein, MD, PhD, and Barbara A. Hutten, PhD, of Amsterdam University Medical Centers in the Netherlands, and their colleagues.

“If corroborated, such findings would underscore the current pediatric guidelines, which recommend starting treatment from the age of 8 years or 10 years, with less-stringent targets than those for adults,” the investigators wrote in the report, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study was based in part on follow-up visits with 184 of the original cohort of 214 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in the 2-year pravastatin study, along with 77 of 95 unaffected siblings who had served as a control group in that study.

At the time of the 20-year follow-up, 79% of the familial hypercholesterolemia patients said they were using lipid-lowering medication, the investigators wrote.

The mean LDL cholesterol level at follow-up was 160.7 mg/dL for those with familial hypercholesterolemia, a drop of 32% when compared with the mean LDL cholesterol level at baseline in the original study, according to the investigators. By contrast, LDL cholesterol in the unaffected siblings was 121.9 mg/dL, up 24% from baseline.

Just 37 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, or about 20%, reached the LDL cholesterol treatment target of less than 100 mg/dL, the investigators wrote.

At the start of the original trial, carotid intima-media thickness was greater in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, compared with their unaffected siblings, with a mean difference of 0.012 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.021) after adjustment for age and sex.

Some 20 years later, the mean difference in thickness for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and unaffected siblings, was 0.555 mm and 0.551 mm, respectively, for a mean difference of just 0.008 mm (95% CI, –0.009 to 0.026) after adjustments.

Data on cardiovascular events and deaths for affected parents was collected, as each child in the study had a parent with confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia, the investigators wrote.

A total of 7% of affected parents had died of MI before the age of 40 years, whereas there were no deaths from cardiovascular causes in all 214 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia from the original study.

Similarly, about a quarter of affected parents had a cardiovascular event before age 40, whereas there was only one event recorded in the patients in the study. That event, angina pectoris resulting in percutaneous coronary intervention, occurred in a patient who stopped taking the drug at the end of the trial, the investigators wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the AMC Foundation. The study authors reported disclosures related to numerous pharmaceutical companies and government, nonprofit, or academic entities.

SOURCE: Kastelein JJP et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1547-56.

Statins started in childhood for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia reduced progression of carotid thickening and cut the risk of cardiovascular disease 20 years later, according to authors of a long-term follow-up study.

There were no deaths and one cardiovascular event by the age of 39 years for patients in the observational study who had, as children, participated in a placebo-controlled, 2-year safety and efficacy study of pravastatin.

These positive effects on disease and a disease marker (carotid intima-media thickness) were observed even though only 20% of patients met LDL cholesterol goals, according to study senior authors John J.P. Kastelein, MD, PhD, and Barbara A. Hutten, PhD, of Amsterdam University Medical Centers in the Netherlands, and their colleagues.

“If corroborated, such findings would underscore the current pediatric guidelines, which recommend starting treatment from the age of 8 years or 10 years, with less-stringent targets than those for adults,” the investigators wrote in the report, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The study was based in part on follow-up visits with 184 of the original cohort of 214 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in the 2-year pravastatin study, along with 77 of 95 unaffected siblings who had served as a control group in that study.

At the time of the 20-year follow-up, 79% of the familial hypercholesterolemia patients said they were using lipid-lowering medication, the investigators wrote.

The mean LDL cholesterol level at follow-up was 160.7 mg/dL for those with familial hypercholesterolemia, a drop of 32% when compared with the mean LDL cholesterol level at baseline in the original study, according to the investigators. By contrast, LDL cholesterol in the unaffected siblings was 121.9 mg/dL, up 24% from baseline.

Just 37 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, or about 20%, reached the LDL cholesterol treatment target of less than 100 mg/dL, the investigators wrote.

At the start of the original trial, carotid intima-media thickness was greater in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, compared with their unaffected siblings, with a mean difference of 0.012 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.021) after adjustment for age and sex.

Some 20 years later, the mean difference in thickness for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and unaffected siblings, was 0.555 mm and 0.551 mm, respectively, for a mean difference of just 0.008 mm (95% CI, –0.009 to 0.026) after adjustments.

Data on cardiovascular events and deaths for affected parents was collected, as each child in the study had a parent with confirmed familial hypercholesterolemia, the investigators wrote.

A total of 7% of affected parents had died of MI before the age of 40 years, whereas there were no deaths from cardiovascular causes in all 214 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia from the original study.

Similarly, about a quarter of affected parents had a cardiovascular event before age 40, whereas there was only one event recorded in the patients in the study. That event, angina pectoris resulting in percutaneous coronary intervention, occurred in a patient who stopped taking the drug at the end of the trial, the investigators wrote.

The study was supported by a grant from the AMC Foundation. The study authors reported disclosures related to numerous pharmaceutical companies and government, nonprofit, or academic entities.

SOURCE: Kastelein JJP et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1547-56.

Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis (CNH) is a chronic painful or crusted, 4- to 6-mm, solitary nodule, primarily on the upper part of the ear (most commonly on the right side). The presence of pain, which increases the likelihood that a person will seek treatment, clinically distinguishes CNH from other cutaneous tumors in the differential diagnosis that produce painless ulceration.

It is roughly 5 times more prevalent in males (72.9%),¹ with an average age of onset of 65 years.² However, CNH has been reported in females³ and rarely in individuals younger than 20 years. According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE and a Google Scholar search using the terms chrondodermatitis nodularis helices child, only 6 cases of CNH have been reported in the pediatric population.^4-8 The youngest reported case was a 9-month-old infant.⁸ Including the present case, males and females in the pediatric population are equally affected; 4 patients had an underlying dermatomyositis,⁷ rheumatoid nodule,⁸ or systemic disease, including systemic lupus erythematosus and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.^5,9 Chronic intermittent pressure from headwear was the etiologic agent in the remaining cases.⁴ Recognizing that CNH can occur in young patients and can be associated with underlying autoimmune disease helps direct management and avoid overly invasive treatment.

Case Report

A 17-year-old adolescent boy presented with a painful ulcerated papule on the right upper helix of 3 months’ duration (Figure 1). The patient habitually slept on the right side, pressed a cell phone to that ear, and wore a tight-fitting visor while lifeguarding, which, along with solar damage, all may have contributed to the disease process. He was otherwise in good health, without a history of underlying systemic disease. Given the patient’s extensive occupational sun exposure, biopsy of the lesion was taken under the impression of CNH vs squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma.

Histopathologic analysis revealed a central area of ulceration with edematous degenerated dermal collagen and overlying inflammatory crust, characteristic of CNH (Figure 2A). Biopsy in this patient demonstrated classic histopathologic findings of CNH, including a central area of epidermal ulceration capped by an inflammatory crust and an underlying edematous degenerated dermal collagen (Figure 2B).

Comment

Pathogenesis
The exact cause of CNH is unknown but is probably the result of prolonged and excessive pressure on the ear that leads to ischemic injury to cartilage and skin. The external location of CNH, lack of bony support, and exquisitely thin padding or insulation in the form of subcutaneous tissue make the small dermal blood vessels supplying the outer ear vulnerable to compression. Dermal inflammation; edema; and necrosis from trauma, cold, or actinic damage also can help initiate CNH. This disruption of blood perfusion to the external ear also inhibits the ear’s ability to heal. A cycle of pressure from objects such as a pillow or cell phone, followed by inadequate healing, leads to secondary perichondritis and remodeling of perichondrial arterioles, which is demonstrated histologically by the presence of perichondrial fibrous thickening, mild chronic inflammation, collagen degeneration, hyalinization, and rarely necrosis or calcification. Healed lesions often show dermal fibrosis overlying perichondrium.

Repeated pressure can lead to vascular changes, but underlying vascular disease also can predispose a person to CNH at a younger age. A striking case of bilateral CNH was reported in an 8-year-old girl with a known history of dermatomyositis.⁷ Furthermore, in 24 patients with CNH (mean age, 43 years), Magro et al⁹ observed an association between CNH and collagen vascular disease, scleroderma, hypertension, thyroid disease, and heart disease, with a higher incidence of any of these medical problems in younger patients. Therefore, screening all patients presenting with CNH, particularly those younger than their fourth decade, for underlying vasculopathy and an autoimmune connective tissue disorder is advised.⁹

Other findings of CNH reported in the literature include loss of elastic fibers in the central area of degenerated dermal collagen and nerve hyperplasia, which might account for pain.⁶ Many of the biopsies in cases of CNH reported in the literature also demonstrate perichondrial fibrous thickening, mild chronic inflammation, and degenerative changes in collagen, including hyalinization and rarely necrosis and calcification. Skin at the periphery of the lesion usually contains granulation tissue, with a mild to moderate inflammatory infiltrate and dilated vessels extending beyond the lesion.²

Genetics might play a role in the disorder, which is suggested by the occurrence of CNH in monozygotic twins¹⁰ and in an otherwise healthy 16-year-old adolescent girl with CNH of the right ear who screened negative for underlying connective tissue disease—serologic tests included antinuclear antibody, anti-Sm, anti-SCL-70, anti-Ro, anti-La, and rheumatoid factor—but who had a family history of a maternal grandmother with CNH, also on the right side.⁶

In the present case, there was no family history or signs and symptoms of underlying systemic disease at the time of diagnosis. The social history revealed excessive occupational sun exposure, habitually wearing a tight visor, and frequent cell phone use, all of which might have contributed to CNH.

Management
Medical management is geared toward relieving pressure at the site of the lesion, which was accomplished by use of an off-loading, ring-shaped, foam pillow at night in a 9-month-old girl with CNH, in which the smaller of her 2 left-sided lesions completely resolved by 6-month follow-up.⁸ However, it often is difficult to achieve adequate relief of pressure because of the patient’s preference for holding a cell phone to a particular ear or unconscious sleeping habits that perpetuate lesions. There are many creative physical interventions to offload aggravating pressure from the area during sleep. A prosthesis can be fashioned by cutting a hole from the center of a bath sponge and securing it with a headband,¹¹ or a crescentic or rectangular piece of self-adhering foam sponge can be applied to the non–hair-bearing postauricular scalp during sleep.¹² Topical antibiotics might relieve pain caused by secondary infection.

Surgical intervention, with or without placement of a full-thickness skin graft, is the mainstay of therapy. Excision was performed in 3 previously reported pediatric cases, with no recurrence reported at 6- to 24-month follow-up. Other treatments employed to varying effect include topical and intralesional steroids, collagen injection, cryotherapy, nitroglycerin paste 2% twice daily,¹³ and electrodesiccation and curettage.¹⁴ In adults, if full resolution is desired, multiple surgeries might be required to remove underlying protuberant cartilage; however, this strategy is not without risk of complication, including formation of adjacent cartilaginous nodules that can become site(s) of CNH recurrence due to a change in pressure points.

Conclusion

Although uncommon, CNH can present on the ears of young patients. A causal link between underlying vasculopathy and CNH has yet to be determined, but the association discovered by Magro et al⁹ merits obtaining a more detailed rheumatologic history and examination, followed by serologic testing (if indicated). Once the diagnosis of CNH is determined, patient education is paramount to prevent recurrence. Increased awareness of habits that inflict persistent repetitive trauma or pressure to the site—from sleeping patterns to cell phone use—will help to extinguish the behavior and therefore the lesion.

Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis (CNH) is a chronic painful or crusted, 4- to 6-mm, solitary nodule, primarily on the upper part of the ear (most commonly on the right side). The presence of pain, which increases the likelihood that a person will seek treatment, clinically distinguishes CNH from other cutaneous tumors in the differential diagnosis that produce painless ulceration.

It is roughly 5 times more prevalent in males (72.9%),¹ with an average age of onset of 65 years.² However, CNH has been reported in females³ and rarely in individuals younger than 20 years. According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE and a Google Scholar search using the terms chrondodermatitis nodularis helices child, only 6 cases of CNH have been reported in the pediatric population.^4-8 The youngest reported case was a 9-month-old infant.⁸ Including the present case, males and females in the pediatric population are equally affected; 4 patients had an underlying dermatomyositis,⁷ rheumatoid nodule,⁸ or systemic disease, including systemic lupus erythematosus and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.^5,9 Chronic intermittent pressure from headwear was the etiologic agent in the remaining cases.⁴ Recognizing that CNH can occur in young patients and can be associated with underlying autoimmune disease helps direct management and avoid overly invasive treatment.

Case Report

A 17-year-old adolescent boy presented with a painful ulcerated papule on the right upper helix of 3 months’ duration (Figure 1). The patient habitually slept on the right side, pressed a cell phone to that ear, and wore a tight-fitting visor while lifeguarding, which, along with solar damage, all may have contributed to the disease process. He was otherwise in good health, without a history of underlying systemic disease. Given the patient’s extensive occupational sun exposure, biopsy of the lesion was taken under the impression of CNH vs squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma.

Histopathologic analysis revealed a central area of ulceration with edematous degenerated dermal collagen and overlying inflammatory crust, characteristic of CNH (Figure 2A). Biopsy in this patient demonstrated classic histopathologic findings of CNH, including a central area of epidermal ulceration capped by an inflammatory crust and an underlying edematous degenerated dermal collagen (Figure 2B).

Comment

Pathogenesis
The exact cause of CNH is unknown but is probably the result of prolonged and excessive pressure on the ear that leads to ischemic injury to cartilage and skin. The external location of CNH, lack of bony support, and exquisitely thin padding or insulation in the form of subcutaneous tissue make the small dermal blood vessels supplying the outer ear vulnerable to compression. Dermal inflammation; edema; and necrosis from trauma, cold, or actinic damage also can help initiate CNH. This disruption of blood perfusion to the external ear also inhibits the ear’s ability to heal. A cycle of pressure from objects such as a pillow or cell phone, followed by inadequate healing, leads to secondary perichondritis and remodeling of perichondrial arterioles, which is demonstrated histologically by the presence of perichondrial fibrous thickening, mild chronic inflammation, collagen degeneration, hyalinization, and rarely necrosis or calcification. Healed lesions often show dermal fibrosis overlying perichondrium.

Repeated pressure can lead to vascular changes, but underlying vascular disease also can predispose a person to CNH at a younger age. A striking case of bilateral CNH was reported in an 8-year-old girl with a known history of dermatomyositis.⁷ Furthermore, in 24 patients with CNH (mean age, 43 years), Magro et al⁹ observed an association between CNH and collagen vascular disease, scleroderma, hypertension, thyroid disease, and heart disease, with a higher incidence of any of these medical problems in younger patients. Therefore, screening all patients presenting with CNH, particularly those younger than their fourth decade, for underlying vasculopathy and an autoimmune connective tissue disorder is advised.⁹

Other findings of CNH reported in the literature include loss of elastic fibers in the central area of degenerated dermal collagen and nerve hyperplasia, which might account for pain.⁶ Many of the biopsies in cases of CNH reported in the literature also demonstrate perichondrial fibrous thickening, mild chronic inflammation, and degenerative changes in collagen, including hyalinization and rarely necrosis and calcification. Skin at the periphery of the lesion usually contains granulation tissue, with a mild to moderate inflammatory infiltrate and dilated vessels extending beyond the lesion.²

Genetics might play a role in the disorder, which is suggested by the occurrence of CNH in monozygotic twins¹⁰ and in an otherwise healthy 16-year-old adolescent girl with CNH of the right ear who screened negative for underlying connective tissue disease—serologic tests included antinuclear antibody, anti-Sm, anti-SCL-70, anti-Ro, anti-La, and rheumatoid factor—but who had a family history of a maternal grandmother with CNH, also on the right side.⁶

In the present case, there was no family history or signs and symptoms of underlying systemic disease at the time of diagnosis. The social history revealed excessive occupational sun exposure, habitually wearing a tight visor, and frequent cell phone use, all of which might have contributed to CNH.

Management
Medical management is geared toward relieving pressure at the site of the lesion, which was accomplished by use of an off-loading, ring-shaped, foam pillow at night in a 9-month-old girl with CNH, in which the smaller of her 2 left-sided lesions completely resolved by 6-month follow-up.⁸ However, it often is difficult to achieve adequate relief of pressure because of the patient’s preference for holding a cell phone to a particular ear or unconscious sleeping habits that perpetuate lesions. There are many creative physical interventions to offload aggravating pressure from the area during sleep. A prosthesis can be fashioned by cutting a hole from the center of a bath sponge and securing it with a headband,¹¹ or a crescentic or rectangular piece of self-adhering foam sponge can be applied to the non–hair-bearing postauricular scalp during sleep.¹² Topical antibiotics might relieve pain caused by secondary infection.

Surgical intervention, with or without placement of a full-thickness skin graft, is the mainstay of therapy. Excision was performed in 3 previously reported pediatric cases, with no recurrence reported at 6- to 24-month follow-up. Other treatments employed to varying effect include topical and intralesional steroids, collagen injection, cryotherapy, nitroglycerin paste 2% twice daily,¹³ and electrodesiccation and curettage.¹⁴ In adults, if full resolution is desired, multiple surgeries might be required to remove underlying protuberant cartilage; however, this strategy is not without risk of complication, including formation of adjacent cartilaginous nodules that can become site(s) of CNH recurrence due to a change in pressure points.

Conclusion

Although uncommon, CNH can present on the ears of young patients. A causal link between underlying vasculopathy and CNH has yet to be determined, but the association discovered by Magro et al⁹ merits obtaining a more detailed rheumatologic history and examination, followed by serologic testing (if indicated). Once the diagnosis of CNH is determined, patient education is paramount to prevent recurrence. Increased awareness of habits that inflict persistent repetitive trauma or pressure to the site—from sleeping patterns to cell phone use—will help to extinguish the behavior and therefore the lesion.

Chondrodermatitis nodularis helicis (CNH) is a chronic painful or crusted, 4- to 6-mm, solitary nodule, primarily on the upper part of the ear (most commonly on the right side). The presence of pain, which increases the likelihood that a person will seek treatment, clinically distinguishes CNH from other cutaneous tumors in the differential diagnosis that produce painless ulceration.

It is roughly 5 times more prevalent in males (72.9%),¹ with an average age of onset of 65 years.² However, CNH has been reported in females³ and rarely in individuals younger than 20 years. According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE and a Google Scholar search using the terms chrondodermatitis nodularis helices child, only 6 cases of CNH have been reported in the pediatric population.^4-8 The youngest reported case was a 9-month-old infant.⁸ Including the present case, males and females in the pediatric population are equally affected; 4 patients had an underlying dermatomyositis,⁷ rheumatoid nodule,⁸ or systemic disease, including systemic lupus erythematosus and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.^5,9 Chronic intermittent pressure from headwear was the etiologic agent in the remaining cases.⁴ Recognizing that CNH can occur in young patients and can be associated with underlying autoimmune disease helps direct management and avoid overly invasive treatment.

Case Report

A 17-year-old adolescent boy presented with a painful ulcerated papule on the right upper helix of 3 months’ duration (Figure 1). The patient habitually slept on the right side, pressed a cell phone to that ear, and wore a tight-fitting visor while lifeguarding, which, along with solar damage, all may have contributed to the disease process. He was otherwise in good health, without a history of underlying systemic disease. Given the patient’s extensive occupational sun exposure, biopsy of the lesion was taken under the impression of CNH vs squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma.

Histopathologic analysis revealed a central area of ulceration with edematous degenerated dermal collagen and overlying inflammatory crust, characteristic of CNH (Figure 2A). Biopsy in this patient demonstrated classic histopathologic findings of CNH, including a central area of epidermal ulceration capped by an inflammatory crust and an underlying edematous degenerated dermal collagen (Figure 2B).

Comment

Pathogenesis
The exact cause of CNH is unknown but is probably the result of prolonged and excessive pressure on the ear that leads to ischemic injury to cartilage and skin. The external location of CNH, lack of bony support, and exquisitely thin padding or insulation in the form of subcutaneous tissue make the small dermal blood vessels supplying the outer ear vulnerable to compression. Dermal inflammation; edema; and necrosis from trauma, cold, or actinic damage also can help initiate CNH. This disruption of blood perfusion to the external ear also inhibits the ear’s ability to heal. A cycle of pressure from objects such as a pillow or cell phone, followed by inadequate healing, leads to secondary perichondritis and remodeling of perichondrial arterioles, which is demonstrated histologically by the presence of perichondrial fibrous thickening, mild chronic inflammation, collagen degeneration, hyalinization, and rarely necrosis or calcification. Healed lesions often show dermal fibrosis overlying perichondrium.

Repeated pressure can lead to vascular changes, but underlying vascular disease also can predispose a person to CNH at a younger age. A striking case of bilateral CNH was reported in an 8-year-old girl with a known history of dermatomyositis.⁷ Furthermore, in 24 patients with CNH (mean age, 43 years), Magro et al⁹ observed an association between CNH and collagen vascular disease, scleroderma, hypertension, thyroid disease, and heart disease, with a higher incidence of any of these medical problems in younger patients. Therefore, screening all patients presenting with CNH, particularly those younger than their fourth decade, for underlying vasculopathy and an autoimmune connective tissue disorder is advised.⁹

Other findings of CNH reported in the literature include loss of elastic fibers in the central area of degenerated dermal collagen and nerve hyperplasia, which might account for pain.⁶ Many of the biopsies in cases of CNH reported in the literature also demonstrate perichondrial fibrous thickening, mild chronic inflammation, and degenerative changes in collagen, including hyalinization and rarely necrosis and calcification. Skin at the periphery of the lesion usually contains granulation tissue, with a mild to moderate inflammatory infiltrate and dilated vessels extending beyond the lesion.²

Genetics might play a role in the disorder, which is suggested by the occurrence of CNH in monozygotic twins¹⁰ and in an otherwise healthy 16-year-old adolescent girl with CNH of the right ear who screened negative for underlying connective tissue disease—serologic tests included antinuclear antibody, anti-Sm, anti-SCL-70, anti-Ro, anti-La, and rheumatoid factor—but who had a family history of a maternal grandmother with CNH, also on the right side.⁶

In the present case, there was no family history or signs and symptoms of underlying systemic disease at the time of diagnosis. The social history revealed excessive occupational sun exposure, habitually wearing a tight visor, and frequent cell phone use, all of which might have contributed to CNH.

Management
Medical management is geared toward relieving pressure at the site of the lesion, which was accomplished by use of an off-loading, ring-shaped, foam pillow at night in a 9-month-old girl with CNH, in which the smaller of her 2 left-sided lesions completely resolved by 6-month follow-up.⁸ However, it often is difficult to achieve adequate relief of pressure because of the patient’s preference for holding a cell phone to a particular ear or unconscious sleeping habits that perpetuate lesions. There are many creative physical interventions to offload aggravating pressure from the area during sleep. A prosthesis can be fashioned by cutting a hole from the center of a bath sponge and securing it with a headband,¹¹ or a crescentic or rectangular piece of self-adhering foam sponge can be applied to the non–hair-bearing postauricular scalp during sleep.¹² Topical antibiotics might relieve pain caused by secondary infection.

Surgical intervention, with or without placement of a full-thickness skin graft, is the mainstay of therapy. Excision was performed in 3 previously reported pediatric cases, with no recurrence reported at 6- to 24-month follow-up. Other treatments employed to varying effect include topical and intralesional steroids, collagen injection, cryotherapy, nitroglycerin paste 2% twice daily,¹³ and electrodesiccation and curettage.¹⁴ In adults, if full resolution is desired, multiple surgeries might be required to remove underlying protuberant cartilage; however, this strategy is not without risk of complication, including formation of adjacent cartilaginous nodules that can become site(s) of CNH recurrence due to a change in pressure points.

Conclusion

Although uncommon, CNH can present on the ears of young patients. A causal link between underlying vasculopathy and CNH has yet to be determined, but the association discovered by Magro et al⁹ merits obtaining a more detailed rheumatologic history and examination, followed by serologic testing (if indicated). Once the diagnosis of CNH is determined, patient education is paramount to prevent recurrence. Increased awareness of habits that inflict persistent repetitive trauma or pressure to the site—from sleeping patterns to cell phone use—will help to extinguish the behavior and therefore the lesion.

Patients with cancer who live in regions with high levels of opioid misuse may be undertreated for pain, according to investigators who studied opioid prescription patterns and cancer incidence in rural southwest Virginia.

Among 4,324 patients with cancer, only 22.16% were prescribed a Controlled Schedule II (C-II) prescription opioid medication at least 3 times in 1 year, from prescribers likely to be treating cancer pain. More than 60% of patients never received a C-II opioid prescription, reported Virginia T. LeBaron, PhD, of the University of Virginia School of Nursing in Charlottesville, and colleagues.

“A clearer view of geographic patterns and predictors of both POM [prescription opioid medication] prescribing and potential harms can inform targeted interventions and policy initiatives that achieve a balanced approach to POMs – ensuring access for patients in need while reducing risk to both patients and communities. Our research makes an important contribution by exploring how the current ‘opioid epidemic’ relates to rural patients with cancer,” they wrote. Their report is in Journal of Oncology Practice.

The investigators studied the confluence of disproportionately high cancer mortality rates and opioid fatality rates in rural southwest Virginia, in the heart of Appalachia.

They conducted a longitudinal, exploratory secondary analysis of data from the Commonwealth of Virginia All Payer Claims database to look at opioid prescribing patterns and explore whether concerns about opioid misuse could result in undertreatment of pain in cancer patients.

They looked at prescribing patterns at the patient, provider, and insurance claim levels, predictors of opioid prescription frequency, opioid-related harms and patterns related to opioid prescribing, cancer incidence, and fatalities.

They identified 4,324 patients with cancer, 958 of whom (22.16%) received a C-II opioid at least three times in any study year. The majority of patients were in the 45-64 age range, and approximately 88% were diagnosed with solid malignancies, with breast cancer and lung cancer being the most frequent diagnoses.

As noted, more than 60% of patients never received a C-II prescription.

“The large percentages of cancer patients never prescribed a C-II are concerning for a number of reasons, especially when we consider the results per year,” the investigators wrote. “First, the ‘no C-II’ patients remain over 80% of the total sample, each year, even after accounting for the upscheduling (from C-III to C-II) of commonly-prescribed hydrocodone products in 2014. Second, anecdotal data and emerging empirical evidence demonstrate that patients with legitimate pain needs, including patients with cancer, experience significant difficulty accessing POMs.”

They noted that regulations regarding opioid prescriptions have become increasingly strict since the end date of their analysis in 2015, suggesting that the number of patients with cancer who are not receiving C-II opioids today may be even higher.

They also pointed to evidence of prescription practices suggesting suboptimal pain management or potential patient harm, such as frequent prescription of opioid-acetaminophen combinations that are dose-limited due to acetaminophen toxicity; coprescription of opioids and benzodiazepines, which is not recommended under current prescribing guidelines; and infrequent use of deterrent formulations of C-II opioids such as crush-resistant tablets.

The study was supported by the University of Virginia Cancer Center, Cancer Control & Population Health Division and the Virginia Tobacco Region Revitalization Commission. The authors reported having no disclaimers or conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: LeBaron VT et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov. 4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00149.

Patients with cancer who live in regions with high levels of opioid misuse may be undertreated for pain, according to investigators who studied opioid prescription patterns and cancer incidence in rural southwest Virginia.

Among 4,324 patients with cancer, only 22.16% were prescribed a Controlled Schedule II (C-II) prescription opioid medication at least 3 times in 1 year, from prescribers likely to be treating cancer pain. More than 60% of patients never received a C-II opioid prescription, reported Virginia T. LeBaron, PhD, of the University of Virginia School of Nursing in Charlottesville, and colleagues.

“A clearer view of geographic patterns and predictors of both POM [prescription opioid medication] prescribing and potential harms can inform targeted interventions and policy initiatives that achieve a balanced approach to POMs – ensuring access for patients in need while reducing risk to both patients and communities. Our research makes an important contribution by exploring how the current ‘opioid epidemic’ relates to rural patients with cancer,” they wrote. Their report is in Journal of Oncology Practice.

The investigators studied the confluence of disproportionately high cancer mortality rates and opioid fatality rates in rural southwest Virginia, in the heart of Appalachia.

They conducted a longitudinal, exploratory secondary analysis of data from the Commonwealth of Virginia All Payer Claims database to look at opioid prescribing patterns and explore whether concerns about opioid misuse could result in undertreatment of pain in cancer patients.

They looked at prescribing patterns at the patient, provider, and insurance claim levels, predictors of opioid prescription frequency, opioid-related harms and patterns related to opioid prescribing, cancer incidence, and fatalities.

They identified 4,324 patients with cancer, 958 of whom (22.16%) received a C-II opioid at least three times in any study year. The majority of patients were in the 45-64 age range, and approximately 88% were diagnosed with solid malignancies, with breast cancer and lung cancer being the most frequent diagnoses.

As noted, more than 60% of patients never received a C-II prescription.

“The large percentages of cancer patients never prescribed a C-II are concerning for a number of reasons, especially when we consider the results per year,” the investigators wrote. “First, the ‘no C-II’ patients remain over 80% of the total sample, each year, even after accounting for the upscheduling (from C-III to C-II) of commonly-prescribed hydrocodone products in 2014. Second, anecdotal data and emerging empirical evidence demonstrate that patients with legitimate pain needs, including patients with cancer, experience significant difficulty accessing POMs.”

They noted that regulations regarding opioid prescriptions have become increasingly strict since the end date of their analysis in 2015, suggesting that the number of patients with cancer who are not receiving C-II opioids today may be even higher.

They also pointed to evidence of prescription practices suggesting suboptimal pain management or potential patient harm, such as frequent prescription of opioid-acetaminophen combinations that are dose-limited due to acetaminophen toxicity; coprescription of opioids and benzodiazepines, which is not recommended under current prescribing guidelines; and infrequent use of deterrent formulations of C-II opioids such as crush-resistant tablets.

The study was supported by the University of Virginia Cancer Center, Cancer Control & Population Health Division and the Virginia Tobacco Region Revitalization Commission. The authors reported having no disclaimers or conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: LeBaron VT et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov. 4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00149.

Patients with cancer who live in regions with high levels of opioid misuse may be undertreated for pain, according to investigators who studied opioid prescription patterns and cancer incidence in rural southwest Virginia.

Among 4,324 patients with cancer, only 22.16% were prescribed a Controlled Schedule II (C-II) prescription opioid medication at least 3 times in 1 year, from prescribers likely to be treating cancer pain. More than 60% of patients never received a C-II opioid prescription, reported Virginia T. LeBaron, PhD, of the University of Virginia School of Nursing in Charlottesville, and colleagues.

“A clearer view of geographic patterns and predictors of both POM [prescription opioid medication] prescribing and potential harms can inform targeted interventions and policy initiatives that achieve a balanced approach to POMs – ensuring access for patients in need while reducing risk to both patients and communities. Our research makes an important contribution by exploring how the current ‘opioid epidemic’ relates to rural patients with cancer,” they wrote. Their report is in Journal of Oncology Practice.

The investigators studied the confluence of disproportionately high cancer mortality rates and opioid fatality rates in rural southwest Virginia, in the heart of Appalachia.

They conducted a longitudinal, exploratory secondary analysis of data from the Commonwealth of Virginia All Payer Claims database to look at opioid prescribing patterns and explore whether concerns about opioid misuse could result in undertreatment of pain in cancer patients.

They looked at prescribing patterns at the patient, provider, and insurance claim levels, predictors of opioid prescription frequency, opioid-related harms and patterns related to opioid prescribing, cancer incidence, and fatalities.

They identified 4,324 patients with cancer, 958 of whom (22.16%) received a C-II opioid at least three times in any study year. The majority of patients were in the 45-64 age range, and approximately 88% were diagnosed with solid malignancies, with breast cancer and lung cancer being the most frequent diagnoses.

As noted, more than 60% of patients never received a C-II prescription.

“The large percentages of cancer patients never prescribed a C-II are concerning for a number of reasons, especially when we consider the results per year,” the investigators wrote. “First, the ‘no C-II’ patients remain over 80% of the total sample, each year, even after accounting for the upscheduling (from C-III to C-II) of commonly-prescribed hydrocodone products in 2014. Second, anecdotal data and emerging empirical evidence demonstrate that patients with legitimate pain needs, including patients with cancer, experience significant difficulty accessing POMs.”

They noted that regulations regarding opioid prescriptions have become increasingly strict since the end date of their analysis in 2015, suggesting that the number of patients with cancer who are not receiving C-II opioids today may be even higher.

They also pointed to evidence of prescription practices suggesting suboptimal pain management or potential patient harm, such as frequent prescription of opioid-acetaminophen combinations that are dose-limited due to acetaminophen toxicity; coprescription of opioids and benzodiazepines, which is not recommended under current prescribing guidelines; and infrequent use of deterrent formulations of C-II opioids such as crush-resistant tablets.

The study was supported by the University of Virginia Cancer Center, Cancer Control & Population Health Division and the Virginia Tobacco Region Revitalization Commission. The authors reported having no disclaimers or conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: LeBaron VT et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov. 4. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00149.

SAN FRANCISCO – Chest tube placement and removal comes with a high error rate, with about one in five procedures going wrong, according to a prospective observational study conducted at 14 adult trauma centers.

“The sad part is, I don’t know if it was surprisingly high, but I’m glad somebody has taken the time to document it,” said Robert Sawyer, MD, professor of surgery at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Mich., who comoderated the session at the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, where the study was presented.

The researchers examined error rates in both insertions and removals, and compared some of the practices and characteristics of trauma centers with unusually good or poor records. The work could begin to inform quality improvement initiatives. “That’s very parallel to where we were 20 or 25 years ago with central venous catheters. We used to put them in and thought it was never a problem, and then we started taking a close look at it and found out, yeah, there was a problem. We systematically made our procedures more consistent and had better outcomes. I think chest tubes is going to be ripe for that,” Dr. Sawyer said in an interview.

“In some ways we have been lying to ourselves. We acknowledge that trainees have a high rate of complications in chest tube insertion and removal, but we haven’t fixed it as a systematic problem. We’re behind in our work to reduce complications for this bedside procedure,” echoed the session’s other comoderator, Tam Pham, MD, professor of surgery at the University of Washington, Seattle, in an interview.

The researchers defined chest tube errors as anything that resulted in a need to manipulate, replace, or revise an existing tube; a worsening of the condition that the tube was intended to address; or complications that resulted in additional length of stay or interventions. A total of 381 chest tubes were placed in 273 patients over a 3-month period, about 55% by residents and about 28% by trauma attending physicians. Around 80% were traditional chest tubes, and most of the rest were Pigtail, with a very small fraction of Trocar chest tubes, according to a pie chart displayed by Michaela West, MD, a trauma surgeon at North Memorial Health, Robbinsdale, Minn., who presented the research.

SOURCE: West M et al. Clinical Congress 2019 Abstract.

SAN FRANCISCO – Chest tube placement and removal comes with a high error rate, with about one in five procedures going wrong, according to a prospective observational study conducted at 14 adult trauma centers.

“The sad part is, I don’t know if it was surprisingly high, but I’m glad somebody has taken the time to document it,” said Robert Sawyer, MD, professor of surgery at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Mich., who comoderated the session at the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, where the study was presented.

The researchers examined error rates in both insertions and removals, and compared some of the practices and characteristics of trauma centers with unusually good or poor records. The work could begin to inform quality improvement initiatives. “That’s very parallel to where we were 20 or 25 years ago with central venous catheters. We used to put them in and thought it was never a problem, and then we started taking a close look at it and found out, yeah, there was a problem. We systematically made our procedures more consistent and had better outcomes. I think chest tubes is going to be ripe for that,” Dr. Sawyer said in an interview.

“In some ways we have been lying to ourselves. We acknowledge that trainees have a high rate of complications in chest tube insertion and removal, but we haven’t fixed it as a systematic problem. We’re behind in our work to reduce complications for this bedside procedure,” echoed the session’s other comoderator, Tam Pham, MD, professor of surgery at the University of Washington, Seattle, in an interview.

The researchers defined chest tube errors as anything that resulted in a need to manipulate, replace, or revise an existing tube; a worsening of the condition that the tube was intended to address; or complications that resulted in additional length of stay or interventions. A total of 381 chest tubes were placed in 273 patients over a 3-month period, about 55% by residents and about 28% by trauma attending physicians. Around 80% were traditional chest tubes, and most of the rest were Pigtail, with a very small fraction of Trocar chest tubes, according to a pie chart displayed by Michaela West, MD, a trauma surgeon at North Memorial Health, Robbinsdale, Minn., who presented the research.

SOURCE: West M et al. Clinical Congress 2019 Abstract.

SAN FRANCISCO – Chest tube placement and removal comes with a high error rate, with about one in five procedures going wrong, according to a prospective observational study conducted at 14 adult trauma centers.

“The sad part is, I don’t know if it was surprisingly high, but I’m glad somebody has taken the time to document it,” said Robert Sawyer, MD, professor of surgery at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Mich., who comoderated the session at the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, where the study was presented.

The researchers examined error rates in both insertions and removals, and compared some of the practices and characteristics of trauma centers with unusually good or poor records. The work could begin to inform quality improvement initiatives. “That’s very parallel to where we were 20 or 25 years ago with central venous catheters. We used to put them in and thought it was never a problem, and then we started taking a close look at it and found out, yeah, there was a problem. We systematically made our procedures more consistent and had better outcomes. I think chest tubes is going to be ripe for that,” Dr. Sawyer said in an interview.

“In some ways we have been lying to ourselves. We acknowledge that trainees have a high rate of complications in chest tube insertion and removal, but we haven’t fixed it as a systematic problem. We’re behind in our work to reduce complications for this bedside procedure,” echoed the session’s other comoderator, Tam Pham, MD, professor of surgery at the University of Washington, Seattle, in an interview.

The researchers defined chest tube errors as anything that resulted in a need to manipulate, replace, or revise an existing tube; a worsening of the condition that the tube was intended to address; or complications that resulted in additional length of stay or interventions. A total of 381 chest tubes were placed in 273 patients over a 3-month period, about 55% by residents and about 28% by trauma attending physicians. Around 80% were traditional chest tubes, and most of the rest were Pigtail, with a very small fraction of Trocar chest tubes, according to a pie chart displayed by Michaela West, MD, a trauma surgeon at North Memorial Health, Robbinsdale, Minn., who presented the research.

SOURCE: West M et al. Clinical Congress 2019 Abstract.

Assistant/Associate/Full Professor (Final Rank/Title Commensurate w/Experience)
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience
College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati

The College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience is recruiting for a psychiatrist (clinical-track) to provide consultation-liaison services for our growing department at the Instructor, Assistant, Associate or Professor level. Opportunities are abundant in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. Inpatient services include traditional and proactive consultation-liaison services in our 519-bed medical center or our 211-bed Daniel Drake Rehabilitation Center. Outpatient opportunities include positions in our integrated and collaborative care clinics as well as any of our traditional general psychiatry and subspecialty psychiatry clinics.

The Department is dedicated to excellence in patient care as well as high quality medical student and resident education and is committed to advancing the science in psychiatry and behavioral neurosciences through clinical trials and ongoing collaborative research. The rank of the appointment is open and will be commensurate with the experience and professional accomplishments of the selected applicants.

Responsibilities may include direct patient care, teaching of medical students, residents and fellows, and research at various University of Cincinnati Health facilities, hospitals, and other local health care systems.

Signing bonus and relocation remuneration are available.

Minimum Qualifications: MD/DO with an Ohio license. Candidate must be board certified/board eligible as a psychiatrist with demonstrated experience or interest in providing consultation-liaison services.

For additional information you may visit http://med.uc.edu/psychiatry or contact Dr. Melissa P. DelBello, Chairman, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of Cincinnati, 260 Stetson Street, Suite 3200, Cincinnati, OH 45219 or via email to [email protected].

The University of Cincinnati, as a multi-national and culturally diverse university, is committed to providing an inclusive, equitable and diverse place of learning and employment. As part of a complete job application you will be asked to include a Contribution to Diversity and Inclusion statement.

The University of Cincinnati is an Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer / M / F / Veteran / Disabled.

Assistant/Associate/Full Professor (Final Rank/Title Commensurate w/Experience)
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience
College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati

The College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience is recruiting for a psychiatrist (clinical-track) to provide consultation-liaison services for our growing department at the Instructor, Assistant, Associate or Professor level. Opportunities are abundant in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. Inpatient services include traditional and proactive consultation-liaison services in our 519-bed medical center or our 211-bed Daniel Drake Rehabilitation Center. Outpatient opportunities include positions in our integrated and collaborative care clinics as well as any of our traditional general psychiatry and subspecialty psychiatry clinics.

The Department is dedicated to excellence in patient care as well as high quality medical student and resident education and is committed to advancing the science in psychiatry and behavioral neurosciences through clinical trials and ongoing collaborative research. The rank of the appointment is open and will be commensurate with the experience and professional accomplishments of the selected applicants.

Responsibilities may include direct patient care, teaching of medical students, residents and fellows, and research at various University of Cincinnati Health facilities, hospitals, and other local health care systems.

Signing bonus and relocation remuneration are available.

Minimum Qualifications: MD/DO with an Ohio license. Candidate must be board certified/board eligible as a psychiatrist with demonstrated experience or interest in providing consultation-liaison services.

For additional information you may visit http://med.uc.edu/psychiatry or contact Dr. Melissa P. DelBello, Chairman, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of Cincinnati, 260 Stetson Street, Suite 3200, Cincinnati, OH 45219 or via email to [email protected].

The University of Cincinnati, as a multi-national and culturally diverse university, is committed to providing an inclusive, equitable and diverse place of learning and employment. As part of a complete job application you will be asked to include a Contribution to Diversity and Inclusion statement.

The University of Cincinnati is an Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer / M / F / Veteran / Disabled.

Assistant/Associate/Full Professor (Final Rank/Title Commensurate w/Experience)
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience
College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati

The College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience is recruiting for a psychiatrist (clinical-track) to provide consultation-liaison services for our growing department at the Instructor, Assistant, Associate or Professor level. Opportunities are abundant in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. Inpatient services include traditional and proactive consultation-liaison services in our 519-bed medical center or our 211-bed Daniel Drake Rehabilitation Center. Outpatient opportunities include positions in our integrated and collaborative care clinics as well as any of our traditional general psychiatry and subspecialty psychiatry clinics.

The Department is dedicated to excellence in patient care as well as high quality medical student and resident education and is committed to advancing the science in psychiatry and behavioral neurosciences through clinical trials and ongoing collaborative research. The rank of the appointment is open and will be commensurate with the experience and professional accomplishments of the selected applicants.

Responsibilities may include direct patient care, teaching of medical students, residents and fellows, and research at various University of Cincinnati Health facilities, hospitals, and other local health care systems.

Signing bonus and relocation remuneration are available.

Minimum Qualifications: MD/DO with an Ohio license. Candidate must be board certified/board eligible as a psychiatrist with demonstrated experience or interest in providing consultation-liaison services.

For additional information you may visit http://med.uc.edu/psychiatry or contact Dr. Melissa P. DelBello, Chairman, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of Cincinnati, 260 Stetson Street, Suite 3200, Cincinnati, OH 45219 or via email to [email protected].

The University of Cincinnati, as a multi-national and culturally diverse university, is committed to providing an inclusive, equitable and diverse place of learning and employment. As part of a complete job application you will be asked to include a Contribution to Diversity and Inclusion statement.

The University of Cincinnati is an Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer / M / F / Veteran / Disabled.

In this edition of “How I will treat my next patient,” I highlight two studies that previously reported significant progression-free survival (PFS) improvements and more recently, at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, overall survival (OS) benefit. I reflect on the significance of these new reports in the wake of previously reported data and guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

Osimertinib in advanced NSCLC

In the double-blind, phase 3 FLAURA trial, 556 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm), advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received osimertinib or a standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as initial treatment. PFS, the primary endpoint, was clinically and statistically better for osimertinib (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio 0.46; P less than .001), overall and in all major subgroups. There were fewer grade 3-4 adverse events and fewer permanent treatment discontinuations with osimertinib.

At the time of initial publication, OS data were immature, but because of the substantial survival improvements previously noted, osimertinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for first-line treatment of EGFRm stage IV NSCLC patients in April 2018 (N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:113-25).

More recently, at ESMO 2019, Suresh Ramalingam, MD, of the department of hematology and medical oncology at Emory University, Atlanta, and colleagues reported the OS results. Crossover to osimertinib was allowed for patients on the standard TKI arm when they had progressive disease and a T790M mutation. Osimertinib produced a median OS of 38.6 months, compared with 31.8 months for standard TKI (HR, 0.799; P = .0462), a 24-month OS rate of 74% vs. 59% (with no overlap in the 95% confidence intervals), and a 36-month OS rate of 54% vs. 44%. These benefits were interpreted to be statistically significant and clinically meaningful.

The 31.8-month median OS for standard TKI was competitive with the highest reported OS for standard therapy, perhaps because crossover to osimertinib was permitted.

What this means in clinical practice

The report by Dr. Ramalingam and colleagues – and the next abstract I will review – remind me of the famous “You had me at Hello” line from “Jerry Maguire.”

For patient education – and perhaps for some national regulatory agencies – it is good that we now have definition of what the average OS is with osimertinib, compared with standard TKI followed by osimertinib. However, very few oncologists in the United States likely use the latter strategy anymore. It was clear when the impressive PFS and toxicity information appeared in 2018 in the New England Journal of Medicine that osimertinib is the best tolerated, most durably effective front-line treatment for EGFRm mNSCLC, regardless of disease extent, sex, nationality, type of EGFRm (L858R amino acid substitution in exon 21 or exon 19 deletion), or presence/absence of central nervous system metastases.

In NCCN guidelines, osimertinib was listed as the preferred TKI, prior to the OS report at ESMO 2019. The challenges going forward will be to identify high-risk patient subsets who might benefit from drug combinations or novel new agents.

MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant

In the MONARCH 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (abema-F) significantly improved PFS, in comparison with placebo plus fulvestrant (placebo-F; 16.9 months vs. 9.3 months; HR, 0.563) in 669 premenopausal (with concurrent ovarian function suppression) and postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who had disease progression on one to two lines of prior hormonal therapy (J Clin Oncol. 2017;35[25]:2875-84).

At ESMO 2019, George W. Sledge Jr., MD, of Stanford (Calif.) Medical Center, and colleagues reported the OS results, a secondary endpoint for the trial (JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 29. doi. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782). At the prespecified interim analysis point, median OS for abema-F was 46.7 months vs. 37.3 months for placebo-F (HR, 0.757; 95% CI 0.505-0.945; P = .0137). Patients with greatest benefit from abema-F were exactly the patients who needed the most help – those with visceral metastases (HR 0.675) and with primary resistance to prior hormonal therapy (HR, 0.686).

At 3 years, at least three times as many patients remained progression free with abema-F, compared with placebo-F, and the abema-F patients experienced prolongation in time to eventual chemotherapy (50.2 months vs. 22.1 months; HR, 0.625).

What this means in clinical practice

Many times I find myself sitting at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and thinking, “Only a medical oncologist like me would find this result exciting.” Prior to ESMO 2019, MONARCH 2 (and a similar study presented at ESMO 2019, MONALEESA-3, which employed an alternative CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, with similar OS results) added to the body of literature that caused NCCN guidelines to list all of the approved CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy for first- or second-line use in patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2/neu-negative mBC. NCCN guidelines have the caveat that, among patients with disease progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the first-line setting, there are no data to support continuing the CDK 4/6 inhibitor or switching to an alternative CDK 4/6 inhibitor thereafter.

For that shrinking group of patients and doctors who choose to avoid CDK 4/6 inhibitors for first-line treatment, as we describe risks and benefits of using a CDK 4/6 inhibitor for second- or third-line therapy, we have high-quality OS information from ESMO 2019 to answer the “Is it worth it?” question.

Are the results of MONARCH 2 and MONALEESA-3 practice changing? No. We were already convinced. Should we be excited that we have this new information for discussions with our patients? Absolutely.
 

Dr. Lyss has been a community-based medical oncologist and clinical researcher for more than 35 years, practicing in St. Louis. His clinical and research interests are in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of breast and lung cancers and in expanding access to clinical trials to medically underserved populations.

In this edition of “How I will treat my next patient,” I highlight two studies that previously reported significant progression-free survival (PFS) improvements and more recently, at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, overall survival (OS) benefit. I reflect on the significance of these new reports in the wake of previously reported data and guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

Osimertinib in advanced NSCLC

In the double-blind, phase 3 FLAURA trial, 556 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm), advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received osimertinib or a standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as initial treatment. PFS, the primary endpoint, was clinically and statistically better for osimertinib (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio 0.46; P less than .001), overall and in all major subgroups. There were fewer grade 3-4 adverse events and fewer permanent treatment discontinuations with osimertinib.

At the time of initial publication, OS data were immature, but because of the substantial survival improvements previously noted, osimertinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for first-line treatment of EGFRm stage IV NSCLC patients in April 2018 (N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:113-25).

More recently, at ESMO 2019, Suresh Ramalingam, MD, of the department of hematology and medical oncology at Emory University, Atlanta, and colleagues reported the OS results. Crossover to osimertinib was allowed for patients on the standard TKI arm when they had progressive disease and a T790M mutation. Osimertinib produced a median OS of 38.6 months, compared with 31.8 months for standard TKI (HR, 0.799; P = .0462), a 24-month OS rate of 74% vs. 59% (with no overlap in the 95% confidence intervals), and a 36-month OS rate of 54% vs. 44%. These benefits were interpreted to be statistically significant and clinically meaningful.

The 31.8-month median OS for standard TKI was competitive with the highest reported OS for standard therapy, perhaps because crossover to osimertinib was permitted.

What this means in clinical practice

The report by Dr. Ramalingam and colleagues – and the next abstract I will review – remind me of the famous “You had me at Hello” line from “Jerry Maguire.”

For patient education – and perhaps for some national regulatory agencies – it is good that we now have definition of what the average OS is with osimertinib, compared with standard TKI followed by osimertinib. However, very few oncologists in the United States likely use the latter strategy anymore. It was clear when the impressive PFS and toxicity information appeared in 2018 in the New England Journal of Medicine that osimertinib is the best tolerated, most durably effective front-line treatment for EGFRm mNSCLC, regardless of disease extent, sex, nationality, type of EGFRm (L858R amino acid substitution in exon 21 or exon 19 deletion), or presence/absence of central nervous system metastases.

In NCCN guidelines, osimertinib was listed as the preferred TKI, prior to the OS report at ESMO 2019. The challenges going forward will be to identify high-risk patient subsets who might benefit from drug combinations or novel new agents.

MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant

In the MONARCH 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (abema-F) significantly improved PFS, in comparison with placebo plus fulvestrant (placebo-F; 16.9 months vs. 9.3 months; HR, 0.563) in 669 premenopausal (with concurrent ovarian function suppression) and postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who had disease progression on one to two lines of prior hormonal therapy (J Clin Oncol. 2017;35[25]:2875-84).

At ESMO 2019, George W. Sledge Jr., MD, of Stanford (Calif.) Medical Center, and colleagues reported the OS results, a secondary endpoint for the trial (JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 29. doi. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782). At the prespecified interim analysis point, median OS for abema-F was 46.7 months vs. 37.3 months for placebo-F (HR, 0.757; 95% CI 0.505-0.945; P = .0137). Patients with greatest benefit from abema-F were exactly the patients who needed the most help – those with visceral metastases (HR 0.675) and with primary resistance to prior hormonal therapy (HR, 0.686).

At 3 years, at least three times as many patients remained progression free with abema-F, compared with placebo-F, and the abema-F patients experienced prolongation in time to eventual chemotherapy (50.2 months vs. 22.1 months; HR, 0.625).

What this means in clinical practice

Many times I find myself sitting at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and thinking, “Only a medical oncologist like me would find this result exciting.” Prior to ESMO 2019, MONARCH 2 (and a similar study presented at ESMO 2019, MONALEESA-3, which employed an alternative CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, with similar OS results) added to the body of literature that caused NCCN guidelines to list all of the approved CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy for first- or second-line use in patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2/neu-negative mBC. NCCN guidelines have the caveat that, among patients with disease progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the first-line setting, there are no data to support continuing the CDK 4/6 inhibitor or switching to an alternative CDK 4/6 inhibitor thereafter.

For that shrinking group of patients and doctors who choose to avoid CDK 4/6 inhibitors for first-line treatment, as we describe risks and benefits of using a CDK 4/6 inhibitor for second- or third-line therapy, we have high-quality OS information from ESMO 2019 to answer the “Is it worth it?” question.

Are the results of MONARCH 2 and MONALEESA-3 practice changing? No. We were already convinced. Should we be excited that we have this new information for discussions with our patients? Absolutely.
 

Dr. Lyss has been a community-based medical oncologist and clinical researcher for more than 35 years, practicing in St. Louis. His clinical and research interests are in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of breast and lung cancers and in expanding access to clinical trials to medically underserved populations.

In this edition of “How I will treat my next patient,” I highlight two studies that previously reported significant progression-free survival (PFS) improvements and more recently, at the European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, overall survival (OS) benefit. I reflect on the significance of these new reports in the wake of previously reported data and guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

Osimertinib in advanced NSCLC

In the double-blind, phase 3 FLAURA trial, 556 patients with EGFR-mutated (EGFRm), advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received osimertinib or a standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as initial treatment. PFS, the primary endpoint, was clinically and statistically better for osimertinib (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio 0.46; P less than .001), overall and in all major subgroups. There were fewer grade 3-4 adverse events and fewer permanent treatment discontinuations with osimertinib.

At the time of initial publication, OS data were immature, but because of the substantial survival improvements previously noted, osimertinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for first-line treatment of EGFRm stage IV NSCLC patients in April 2018 (N Engl J Med. 2018; 378:113-25).

More recently, at ESMO 2019, Suresh Ramalingam, MD, of the department of hematology and medical oncology at Emory University, Atlanta, and colleagues reported the OS results. Crossover to osimertinib was allowed for patients on the standard TKI arm when they had progressive disease and a T790M mutation. Osimertinib produced a median OS of 38.6 months, compared with 31.8 months for standard TKI (HR, 0.799; P = .0462), a 24-month OS rate of 74% vs. 59% (with no overlap in the 95% confidence intervals), and a 36-month OS rate of 54% vs. 44%. These benefits were interpreted to be statistically significant and clinically meaningful.

The 31.8-month median OS for standard TKI was competitive with the highest reported OS for standard therapy, perhaps because crossover to osimertinib was permitted.

What this means in clinical practice

The report by Dr. Ramalingam and colleagues – and the next abstract I will review – remind me of the famous “You had me at Hello” line from “Jerry Maguire.”

For patient education – and perhaps for some national regulatory agencies – it is good that we now have definition of what the average OS is with osimertinib, compared with standard TKI followed by osimertinib. However, very few oncologists in the United States likely use the latter strategy anymore. It was clear when the impressive PFS and toxicity information appeared in 2018 in the New England Journal of Medicine that osimertinib is the best tolerated, most durably effective front-line treatment for EGFRm mNSCLC, regardless of disease extent, sex, nationality, type of EGFRm (L858R amino acid substitution in exon 21 or exon 19 deletion), or presence/absence of central nervous system metastases.

In NCCN guidelines, osimertinib was listed as the preferred TKI, prior to the OS report at ESMO 2019. The challenges going forward will be to identify high-risk patient subsets who might benefit from drug combinations or novel new agents.

MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant

In the MONARCH 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (abema-F) significantly improved PFS, in comparison with placebo plus fulvestrant (placebo-F; 16.9 months vs. 9.3 months; HR, 0.563) in 669 premenopausal (with concurrent ovarian function suppression) and postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who had disease progression on one to two lines of prior hormonal therapy (J Clin Oncol. 2017;35[25]:2875-84).

At ESMO 2019, George W. Sledge Jr., MD, of Stanford (Calif.) Medical Center, and colleagues reported the OS results, a secondary endpoint for the trial (JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 29. doi. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4782). At the prespecified interim analysis point, median OS for abema-F was 46.7 months vs. 37.3 months for placebo-F (HR, 0.757; 95% CI 0.505-0.945; P = .0137). Patients with greatest benefit from abema-F were exactly the patients who needed the most help – those with visceral metastases (HR 0.675) and with primary resistance to prior hormonal therapy (HR, 0.686).

At 3 years, at least three times as many patients remained progression free with abema-F, compared with placebo-F, and the abema-F patients experienced prolongation in time to eventual chemotherapy (50.2 months vs. 22.1 months; HR, 0.625).

What this means in clinical practice

Many times I find myself sitting at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and thinking, “Only a medical oncologist like me would find this result exciting.” Prior to ESMO 2019, MONARCH 2 (and a similar study presented at ESMO 2019, MONALEESA-3, which employed an alternative CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, with similar OS results) added to the body of literature that caused NCCN guidelines to list all of the approved CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy for first- or second-line use in patients with hormone-receptor positive, HER2/neu-negative mBC. NCCN guidelines have the caveat that, among patients with disease progression on CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the first-line setting, there are no data to support continuing the CDK 4/6 inhibitor or switching to an alternative CDK 4/6 inhibitor thereafter.

For that shrinking group of patients and doctors who choose to avoid CDK 4/6 inhibitors for first-line treatment, as we describe risks and benefits of using a CDK 4/6 inhibitor for second- or third-line therapy, we have high-quality OS information from ESMO 2019 to answer the “Is it worth it?” question.

Are the results of MONARCH 2 and MONALEESA-3 practice changing? No. We were already convinced. Should we be excited that we have this new information for discussions with our patients? Absolutely.
 

Dr. Lyss has been a community-based medical oncologist and clinical researcher for more than 35 years, practicing in St. Louis. His clinical and research interests are in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of breast and lung cancers and in expanding access to clinical trials to medically underserved populations.

Patterns of health care use and costs at the end of life among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients differ considerably between the United States and Canada and offer learning opportunities for both countries, suggests a cross-sectional cohort study.

Total costs were one-fourth higher for U.S. patients, who more often received chemotherapy and imaging in the month leading up to death. Canadian patients in the province of Ontario were more likely to be hospitalized and to die in the hospital.

“Our findings add to the growing body of research describing health care utilization and costs among patients in different systems to inform efforts to improve organization and delivery of care,” write the investigators, led by Karen E. Bremner, BSc, a research associate with the Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, and the Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative. “These findings suggest opportunities for reducing chemotherapy and ICU use in the U.S. and hospitalizations in Ontario.”

The investigators used registries to identify patients who received a diagnosis of CRC of any stage during 2007-2013 and died of any cancer during that period at the age of 66 years or older.

Analyses compared health care use and costs between 16,565 patients from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries linked to Medicare claims and 6,587 patients from the Ontario Cancer Registry linked to administrative health data.

Across months, but especially in the month before death, the SEER-Medicare group was more likely than the Ontario group to receive chemotherapy (15.7% vs. 8.0% in the last month of life) and have imaging tests (39.4% vs. 31.1% in the last month of life), according to results reported in the Journal of Oncology Practice.

Ontario patients more often visited the emergency department (14.7% vs. 6.7%) and were hospitalized (62.5% vs. 51.0%) in the month before death; had longer stays (14.1 vs. 10.9 days); and were more likely to die in the hospital (42.0% vs. 24.3%). But once hospitalized, they were less often admitted to the ICU (17.9% vs. 43.2%).

Mean total costs for all health care resources in the last month of life were 25% higher for the SEER-Medicare group compared with the Ontario group ($17,284 vs. $13,849), with the gap widening by stage at diagnosis. Costs were 12% higher for those with stage 0 to II disease, 27% higher for those with stage III disease, and 32% higher for those with stage IV disease.

The SEER-Medicare group had higher hospitalization costs ($11,180 vs. $9,434) with daily hospital costs that were about twice those of Ontario counterparts ($2,004 vs. $1,067).

“[O]ur descriptive study of health care utilization and costs at the end of life in similar groups of older CRC patients, although not supporting a direct comparison of two health systems, generated hypotheses concerning areas for improvement in service delivery and lower costs in both settings,” Ms. Bremner and coinvestigators maintained.

“In Ontario, improving coordination of end-of-life care and reducing hospitalizations and in-hospital deaths could provide savings,” they noted. “Reducing daily hospital costs and intensity of health care services for SEER-Medicare patients, especially those with stage IV disease at diagnosis, could reduce costs to the Medicare program and decrease the financial burden on patients and families.”

Ms. Bremner disclosed that she had no conflicts of interest. The Ontario arm of the study was funded by the Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, which receives core funding from the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

SOURCE: Bremner KE et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Oct 24. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00061.

Patterns of health care use and costs at the end of life among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients differ considerably between the United States and Canada and offer learning opportunities for both countries, suggests a cross-sectional cohort study.

Total costs were one-fourth higher for U.S. patients, who more often received chemotherapy and imaging in the month leading up to death. Canadian patients in the province of Ontario were more likely to be hospitalized and to die in the hospital.

“Our findings add to the growing body of research describing health care utilization and costs among patients in different systems to inform efforts to improve organization and delivery of care,” write the investigators, led by Karen E. Bremner, BSc, a research associate with the Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, and the Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative. “These findings suggest opportunities for reducing chemotherapy and ICU use in the U.S. and hospitalizations in Ontario.”

The investigators used registries to identify patients who received a diagnosis of CRC of any stage during 2007-2013 and died of any cancer during that period at the age of 66 years or older.

Analyses compared health care use and costs between 16,565 patients from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries linked to Medicare claims and 6,587 patients from the Ontario Cancer Registry linked to administrative health data.

Across months, but especially in the month before death, the SEER-Medicare group was more likely than the Ontario group to receive chemotherapy (15.7% vs. 8.0% in the last month of life) and have imaging tests (39.4% vs. 31.1% in the last month of life), according to results reported in the Journal of Oncology Practice.

Ontario patients more often visited the emergency department (14.7% vs. 6.7%) and were hospitalized (62.5% vs. 51.0%) in the month before death; had longer stays (14.1 vs. 10.9 days); and were more likely to die in the hospital (42.0% vs. 24.3%). But once hospitalized, they were less often admitted to the ICU (17.9% vs. 43.2%).

Mean total costs for all health care resources in the last month of life were 25% higher for the SEER-Medicare group compared with the Ontario group ($17,284 vs. $13,849), with the gap widening by stage at diagnosis. Costs were 12% higher for those with stage 0 to II disease, 27% higher for those with stage III disease, and 32% higher for those with stage IV disease.

The SEER-Medicare group had higher hospitalization costs ($11,180 vs. $9,434) with daily hospital costs that were about twice those of Ontario counterparts ($2,004 vs. $1,067).

“[O]ur descriptive study of health care utilization and costs at the end of life in similar groups of older CRC patients, although not supporting a direct comparison of two health systems, generated hypotheses concerning areas for improvement in service delivery and lower costs in both settings,” Ms. Bremner and coinvestigators maintained.

“In Ontario, improving coordination of end-of-life care and reducing hospitalizations and in-hospital deaths could provide savings,” they noted. “Reducing daily hospital costs and intensity of health care services for SEER-Medicare patients, especially those with stage IV disease at diagnosis, could reduce costs to the Medicare program and decrease the financial burden on patients and families.”

Ms. Bremner disclosed that she had no conflicts of interest. The Ontario arm of the study was funded by the Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, which receives core funding from the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

SOURCE: Bremner KE et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Oct 24. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00061.

Patterns of health care use and costs at the end of life among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients differ considerably between the United States and Canada and offer learning opportunities for both countries, suggests a cross-sectional cohort study.

Total costs were one-fourth higher for U.S. patients, who more often received chemotherapy and imaging in the month leading up to death. Canadian patients in the province of Ontario were more likely to be hospitalized and to die in the hospital.

“Our findings add to the growing body of research describing health care utilization and costs among patients in different systems to inform efforts to improve organization and delivery of care,” write the investigators, led by Karen E. Bremner, BSc, a research associate with the Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, and the Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative. “These findings suggest opportunities for reducing chemotherapy and ICU use in the U.S. and hospitalizations in Ontario.”

The investigators used registries to identify patients who received a diagnosis of CRC of any stage during 2007-2013 and died of any cancer during that period at the age of 66 years or older.

Analyses compared health care use and costs between 16,565 patients from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries linked to Medicare claims and 6,587 patients from the Ontario Cancer Registry linked to administrative health data.

Across months, but especially in the month before death, the SEER-Medicare group was more likely than the Ontario group to receive chemotherapy (15.7% vs. 8.0% in the last month of life) and have imaging tests (39.4% vs. 31.1% in the last month of life), according to results reported in the Journal of Oncology Practice.

Ontario patients more often visited the emergency department (14.7% vs. 6.7%) and were hospitalized (62.5% vs. 51.0%) in the month before death; had longer stays (14.1 vs. 10.9 days); and were more likely to die in the hospital (42.0% vs. 24.3%). But once hospitalized, they were less often admitted to the ICU (17.9% vs. 43.2%).

Mean total costs for all health care resources in the last month of life were 25% higher for the SEER-Medicare group compared with the Ontario group ($17,284 vs. $13,849), with the gap widening by stage at diagnosis. Costs were 12% higher for those with stage 0 to II disease, 27% higher for those with stage III disease, and 32% higher for those with stage IV disease.

The SEER-Medicare group had higher hospitalization costs ($11,180 vs. $9,434) with daily hospital costs that were about twice those of Ontario counterparts ($2,004 vs. $1,067).

“[O]ur descriptive study of health care utilization and costs at the end of life in similar groups of older CRC patients, although not supporting a direct comparison of two health systems, generated hypotheses concerning areas for improvement in service delivery and lower costs in both settings,” Ms. Bremner and coinvestigators maintained.

“In Ontario, improving coordination of end-of-life care and reducing hospitalizations and in-hospital deaths could provide savings,” they noted. “Reducing daily hospital costs and intensity of health care services for SEER-Medicare patients, especially those with stage IV disease at diagnosis, could reduce costs to the Medicare program and decrease the financial burden on patients and families.”

Ms. Bremner disclosed that she had no conflicts of interest. The Ontario arm of the study was funded by the Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, which receives core funding from the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute.

SOURCE: Bremner KE et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Oct 24. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00061.

LAS VEGAS – Bariatric surgery in adolescents was about as safe as it was in adults in the largest U.S. database assembled so far for the procedure in this younger age group.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The data from 1,983 patients aged 10-19 years who underwent bariatric surgery at an accredited U.S. center also showed, not unexpectedly, that laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was significantly safer during the perioperative and immediate postoperative periods, compared with the other main surgical option, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

The incidence of serious adverse events that occurred in adolescents either during surgery or in the 30 days after surgery was 2.9% in the 1,552 patients (78%) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and 6.5% in the 431 (22%) patients who underwent gastric bypass, Keith J. King, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Despite this safety disparity, “the decision to undergo sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass should be individualized to account for other factors, such as excess weight loss and long-term success,” said Dr. King, a bariatric surgeon at St. Luke’s Hospital, Allentown, Pa. But he acknowledged that having these recent safety data from a relatively large number of adolescents will help families that are trying to decide on treatment for their child.

The data came from records kept by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program, begun in 2012 by the American College of Surgeons and the American Society for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, and a registry for every bariatric surgical procedure done at an accredited U.S. program. The database encompassed 840 surgical programs in 2019.

The incidence of perioperative and postoperative complications in the adolescent patients during the first 30 days after surgery was not statistically significant for any measured safety parameter, compared with 353,726 adults (at least 20 years old) enrolled in the same database during 2015-2017, except for the average duration of surgery, which was 8 minutes shorter in adolescents, Dr. King reported. The data showed that adolescents and adults had roughly similar rates of serious adverse events, organ space infections, and need for reoperation, intervention, or hospital readmission. The way in which clinicians applied bariatric surgery to adolescents also seemed similar to their use of the surgery in adults. The average body mass index of adult patients was about 45 kg/m², and about 48 kg/m² in adolescents, and in both age groups, nearly 80% of patients were women or girls.

In contrast, the comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery in adolescents showed several statistically significant differences in safety and procedural characteristics. In addition to a more than twofold difference in the incidence of serious adverse events that favored the sleeve, the data also showed a twofold difference in the need for reoperation, 1% with the sleeve and 2% with bypass; and a threefold difference in the need for at least one intervention during 30-day follow-up, 1% in the sleeve recipients and 3% in those treated with gastric bypass. Patients required at least one hospital readmission within 30 days in 3% of the sleeve cases and in 6% of the bypass cases. Average hospital length of stay was 2 days in both groups.

An efficacy review from a different, large, U.S. database that included 544 adolescents who underwent bariatric surgery during 2005-2015 showed that at 3 years after surgery, average reductions in body mass index were 29% for patients who underwent gastric bypass and 25% in those treated with sleeve gastrectomy (Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14[9]:1374-86).

The study received no commercial support. Dr. King had no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: El Chaar M et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A138.

LAS VEGAS – Bariatric surgery in adolescents was about as safe as it was in adults in the largest U.S. database assembled so far for the procedure in this younger age group.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The data from 1,983 patients aged 10-19 years who underwent bariatric surgery at an accredited U.S. center also showed, not unexpectedly, that laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was significantly safer during the perioperative and immediate postoperative periods, compared with the other main surgical option, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

The incidence of serious adverse events that occurred in adolescents either during surgery or in the 30 days after surgery was 2.9% in the 1,552 patients (78%) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and 6.5% in the 431 (22%) patients who underwent gastric bypass, Keith J. King, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Despite this safety disparity, “the decision to undergo sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass should be individualized to account for other factors, such as excess weight loss and long-term success,” said Dr. King, a bariatric surgeon at St. Luke’s Hospital, Allentown, Pa. But he acknowledged that having these recent safety data from a relatively large number of adolescents will help families that are trying to decide on treatment for their child.

The data came from records kept by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program, begun in 2012 by the American College of Surgeons and the American Society for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, and a registry for every bariatric surgical procedure done at an accredited U.S. program. The database encompassed 840 surgical programs in 2019.

The incidence of perioperative and postoperative complications in the adolescent patients during the first 30 days after surgery was not statistically significant for any measured safety parameter, compared with 353,726 adults (at least 20 years old) enrolled in the same database during 2015-2017, except for the average duration of surgery, which was 8 minutes shorter in adolescents, Dr. King reported. The data showed that adolescents and adults had roughly similar rates of serious adverse events, organ space infections, and need for reoperation, intervention, or hospital readmission. The way in which clinicians applied bariatric surgery to adolescents also seemed similar to their use of the surgery in adults. The average body mass index of adult patients was about 45 kg/m², and about 48 kg/m² in adolescents, and in both age groups, nearly 80% of patients were women or girls.

In contrast, the comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery in adolescents showed several statistically significant differences in safety and procedural characteristics. In addition to a more than twofold difference in the incidence of serious adverse events that favored the sleeve, the data also showed a twofold difference in the need for reoperation, 1% with the sleeve and 2% with bypass; and a threefold difference in the need for at least one intervention during 30-day follow-up, 1% in the sleeve recipients and 3% in those treated with gastric bypass. Patients required at least one hospital readmission within 30 days in 3% of the sleeve cases and in 6% of the bypass cases. Average hospital length of stay was 2 days in both groups.

An efficacy review from a different, large, U.S. database that included 544 adolescents who underwent bariatric surgery during 2005-2015 showed that at 3 years after surgery, average reductions in body mass index were 29% for patients who underwent gastric bypass and 25% in those treated with sleeve gastrectomy (Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14[9]:1374-86).

The study received no commercial support. Dr. King had no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: El Chaar M et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A138.

LAS VEGAS – Bariatric surgery in adolescents was about as safe as it was in adults in the largest U.S. database assembled so far for the procedure in this younger age group.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News

The data from 1,983 patients aged 10-19 years who underwent bariatric surgery at an accredited U.S. center also showed, not unexpectedly, that laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy was significantly safer during the perioperative and immediate postoperative periods, compared with the other main surgical option, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

The incidence of serious adverse events that occurred in adolescents either during surgery or in the 30 days after surgery was 2.9% in the 1,552 patients (78%) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and 6.5% in the 431 (22%) patients who underwent gastric bypass, Keith J. King, MD, said at a meeting presented by the Obesity Society and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Despite this safety disparity, “the decision to undergo sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass should be individualized to account for other factors, such as excess weight loss and long-term success,” said Dr. King, a bariatric surgeon at St. Luke’s Hospital, Allentown, Pa. But he acknowledged that having these recent safety data from a relatively large number of adolescents will help families that are trying to decide on treatment for their child.

The data came from records kept by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program, begun in 2012 by the American College of Surgeons and the American Society for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, and a registry for every bariatric surgical procedure done at an accredited U.S. program. The database encompassed 840 surgical programs in 2019.

The incidence of perioperative and postoperative complications in the adolescent patients during the first 30 days after surgery was not statistically significant for any measured safety parameter, compared with 353,726 adults (at least 20 years old) enrolled in the same database during 2015-2017, except for the average duration of surgery, which was 8 minutes shorter in adolescents, Dr. King reported. The data showed that adolescents and adults had roughly similar rates of serious adverse events, organ space infections, and need for reoperation, intervention, or hospital readmission. The way in which clinicians applied bariatric surgery to adolescents also seemed similar to their use of the surgery in adults. The average body mass index of adult patients was about 45 kg/m², and about 48 kg/m² in adolescents, and in both age groups, nearly 80% of patients were women or girls.

In contrast, the comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass surgery in adolescents showed several statistically significant differences in safety and procedural characteristics. In addition to a more than twofold difference in the incidence of serious adverse events that favored the sleeve, the data also showed a twofold difference in the need for reoperation, 1% with the sleeve and 2% with bypass; and a threefold difference in the need for at least one intervention during 30-day follow-up, 1% in the sleeve recipients and 3% in those treated with gastric bypass. Patients required at least one hospital readmission within 30 days in 3% of the sleeve cases and in 6% of the bypass cases. Average hospital length of stay was 2 days in both groups.

An efficacy review from a different, large, U.S. database that included 544 adolescents who underwent bariatric surgery during 2005-2015 showed that at 3 years after surgery, average reductions in body mass index were 29% for patients who underwent gastric bypass and 25% in those treated with sleeve gastrectomy (Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14[9]:1374-86).

The study received no commercial support. Dr. King had no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: El Chaar M et al. Obesity Week 2019, Abstract A138.

CHICAGO – A new image-analysis algorithm for benign thyroid nodules that uses a technique similar to facial recognition showed good sensitivity and specificity, with the potential to reduce biopsies by more than 50%.

The negative predictive value of the ultrasound analysis algorithm was 93.2%, a figure approximating the false-negative rate of about 5% that is seen in fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules, said Johnson Thomas, MD, at the annual meeting of the American Thyroid Association.

“Millions of people have thyroid nodules,” many of which are detected incidentally, said Dr. Thomas, an endocrinologist with the Mercy health care system in Springfield, Mo. Fewer than 10% of thyroid nodules turn out to be malignant, but each year, millions of patients undergo biopsies to determine the status of their thyroid nodules.

Faced with evaluating a thyroid nodule, an endocrinologist can currently turn to a risk-stratification scheme, such as those developed by the American College of Radiology and the American Thyroid Association. However, there’s a big subjective component to risk stratification – significant inter- and intraobserver variation has been observed, said Dr. Thomas, and not all nodules are classifiable. The result is a system that still has low specificity and positive predictive value, he said.

Even after a decision to proceed to biopsy, one in seven thyroid nodule biopsies will not produce a definitive diagnosis, he said.

“We are doing millions of thyroid biopsies based on very subjective criteria to find thyroid cancer in a very small percentage of the population, with an invasive technique that may not be diagnostic one out of seven times,” Dr. Thomas said in summing up the current medical situation as he sees it.

Dr. Thomas, who writes his own computer code, said he was searching for a reliable and explainable noninvasive technique, and one that lacked subjective room for error, to address the thyroid nodule problem.

The question was whether an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm could match radiologist performance in classifying thyroid nodules according to the characteristics of their ultrasound images.

Other algorithms use AI to predict which nodules are malignant, but they function as “black boxes” – a common criticism of AI. The outside observer cannot ordinarily see how the AI algorithm “knows” what it knows. This characteristic of AI poses at least a theoretical problem when such algorithms are used for diagnosis or medical decision making.

Dr. Thomas’s* approach was to use a set of training data to allow the algorithm he constructed to see 2,025 images from a total of 482 nodules. The thyroid nodules used for training had been subjected to biopsy or excised in surgery, so they all had a definitive status of being benign or malignant.

Then, after the algorithm was refined, a set of 103 nodules with known malignancy status was used to test the algorithm’s sensitivity and specificity.

The algorithm, dubbed AiBx, used a convolutional neural network to build a unique image vector for each nodule. The AiBx algorithm then looked at the training database to find the “nearest neighbors,” or the images it found to be the most similar to those of the nodule being examined.

For example, said Dr. Thomas, a test image of a benign nodule would have an output from the AiBx analysis of three similar images from the database – all benign. Hence, rather than making a black-box call of whether a nodule is benign or malignant, the algorithm merely says: “This nodule resembles a benign nodule in our database.” The interpreting physician can then use the algorithm as a decision aid with confidence.

The overall accuracy of AiBx was 81.5%, sensitivity was 87.8%, and specificity was 78.5%. Positive predictive value was 65.9%.

As more images are added to the database, AiBx can easily be retrained and refined, said Dr. Thomas.

“It’s intuitive and explainable,” he added, noting that the algorithm is also a good teaching tool for residents and fellows.

“This AI model can be deployed as an app, integrated with [medical imaging systems] or hosted as a website. By using image-similarity AI models we can eliminate subjectivity and decrease the number of unnecessary biopsies,” he explained in the abstract accompanying the presentation.

However, he said that the algorithm as it currently stands has limitations: It has been tested on only 103 images thus far, and there’s the potential for selection bias.

Dr. Thomas* reported that, although he developed the AiBx algorithm, he has not drawn income or royalties from it. He reported no other relevant conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Thomas* J et al. ATA 2019, Oral Abstract 27.

*Correction, 21/11/2019: An earlier version of this story misstated Dr. Thomas's last name.

CHICAGO – A new image-analysis algorithm for benign thyroid nodules that uses a technique similar to facial recognition showed good sensitivity and specificity, with the potential to reduce biopsies by more than 50%.

The negative predictive value of the ultrasound analysis algorithm was 93.2%, a figure approximating the false-negative rate of about 5% that is seen in fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules, said Johnson Thomas, MD, at the annual meeting of the American Thyroid Association.

“Millions of people have thyroid nodules,” many of which are detected incidentally, said Dr. Thomas, an endocrinologist with the Mercy health care system in Springfield, Mo. Fewer than 10% of thyroid nodules turn out to be malignant, but each year, millions of patients undergo biopsies to determine the status of their thyroid nodules.

Faced with evaluating a thyroid nodule, an endocrinologist can currently turn to a risk-stratification scheme, such as those developed by the American College of Radiology and the American Thyroid Association. However, there’s a big subjective component to risk stratification – significant inter- and intraobserver variation has been observed, said Dr. Thomas, and not all nodules are classifiable. The result is a system that still has low specificity and positive predictive value, he said.

Even after a decision to proceed to biopsy, one in seven thyroid nodule biopsies will not produce a definitive diagnosis, he said.

“We are doing millions of thyroid biopsies based on very subjective criteria to find thyroid cancer in a very small percentage of the population, with an invasive technique that may not be diagnostic one out of seven times,” Dr. Thomas said in summing up the current medical situation as he sees it.

Dr. Thomas, who writes his own computer code, said he was searching for a reliable and explainable noninvasive technique, and one that lacked subjective room for error, to address the thyroid nodule problem.

The question was whether an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm could match radiologist performance in classifying thyroid nodules according to the characteristics of their ultrasound images.

Other algorithms use AI to predict which nodules are malignant, but they function as “black boxes” – a common criticism of AI. The outside observer cannot ordinarily see how the AI algorithm “knows” what it knows. This characteristic of AI poses at least a theoretical problem when such algorithms are used for diagnosis or medical decision making.

Dr. Thomas’s* approach was to use a set of training data to allow the algorithm he constructed to see 2,025 images from a total of 482 nodules. The thyroid nodules used for training had been subjected to biopsy or excised in surgery, so they all had a definitive status of being benign or malignant.

Then, after the algorithm was refined, a set of 103 nodules with known malignancy status was used to test the algorithm’s sensitivity and specificity.

The algorithm, dubbed AiBx, used a convolutional neural network to build a unique image vector for each nodule. The AiBx algorithm then looked at the training database to find the “nearest neighbors,” or the images it found to be the most similar to those of the nodule being examined.

For example, said Dr. Thomas, a test image of a benign nodule would have an output from the AiBx analysis of three similar images from the database – all benign. Hence, rather than making a black-box call of whether a nodule is benign or malignant, the algorithm merely says: “This nodule resembles a benign nodule in our database.” The interpreting physician can then use the algorithm as a decision aid with confidence.

The overall accuracy of AiBx was 81.5%, sensitivity was 87.8%, and specificity was 78.5%. Positive predictive value was 65.9%.

As more images are added to the database, AiBx can easily be retrained and refined, said Dr. Thomas.

“It’s intuitive and explainable,” he added, noting that the algorithm is also a good teaching tool for residents and fellows.

“This AI model can be deployed as an app, integrated with [medical imaging systems] or hosted as a website. By using image-similarity AI models we can eliminate subjectivity and decrease the number of unnecessary biopsies,” he explained in the abstract accompanying the presentation.

However, he said that the algorithm as it currently stands has limitations: It has been tested on only 103 images thus far, and there’s the potential for selection bias.

Dr. Thomas* reported that, although he developed the AiBx algorithm, he has not drawn income or royalties from it. He reported no other relevant conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Thomas* J et al. ATA 2019, Oral Abstract 27.

*Correction, 21/11/2019: An earlier version of this story misstated Dr. Thomas's last name.

CHICAGO – A new image-analysis algorithm for benign thyroid nodules that uses a technique similar to facial recognition showed good sensitivity and specificity, with the potential to reduce biopsies by more than 50%.

The negative predictive value of the ultrasound analysis algorithm was 93.2%, a figure approximating the false-negative rate of about 5% that is seen in fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules, said Johnson Thomas, MD, at the annual meeting of the American Thyroid Association.

“Millions of people have thyroid nodules,” many of which are detected incidentally, said Dr. Thomas, an endocrinologist with the Mercy health care system in Springfield, Mo. Fewer than 10% of thyroid nodules turn out to be malignant, but each year, millions of patients undergo biopsies to determine the status of their thyroid nodules.

Faced with evaluating a thyroid nodule, an endocrinologist can currently turn to a risk-stratification scheme, such as those developed by the American College of Radiology and the American Thyroid Association. However, there’s a big subjective component to risk stratification – significant inter- and intraobserver variation has been observed, said Dr. Thomas, and not all nodules are classifiable. The result is a system that still has low specificity and positive predictive value, he said.

Even after a decision to proceed to biopsy, one in seven thyroid nodule biopsies will not produce a definitive diagnosis, he said.

“We are doing millions of thyroid biopsies based on very subjective criteria to find thyroid cancer in a very small percentage of the population, with an invasive technique that may not be diagnostic one out of seven times,” Dr. Thomas said in summing up the current medical situation as he sees it.

Dr. Thomas, who writes his own computer code, said he was searching for a reliable and explainable noninvasive technique, and one that lacked subjective room for error, to address the thyroid nodule problem.

The question was whether an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm could match radiologist performance in classifying thyroid nodules according to the characteristics of their ultrasound images.

Other algorithms use AI to predict which nodules are malignant, but they function as “black boxes” – a common criticism of AI. The outside observer cannot ordinarily see how the AI algorithm “knows” what it knows. This characteristic of AI poses at least a theoretical problem when such algorithms are used for diagnosis or medical decision making.

Dr. Thomas’s* approach was to use a set of training data to allow the algorithm he constructed to see 2,025 images from a total of 482 nodules. The thyroid nodules used for training had been subjected to biopsy or excised in surgery, so they all had a definitive status of being benign or malignant.

Then, after the algorithm was refined, a set of 103 nodules with known malignancy status was used to test the algorithm’s sensitivity and specificity.

The algorithm, dubbed AiBx, used a convolutional neural network to build a unique image vector for each nodule. The AiBx algorithm then looked at the training database to find the “nearest neighbors,” or the images it found to be the most similar to those of the nodule being examined.

For example, said Dr. Thomas, a test image of a benign nodule would have an output from the AiBx analysis of three similar images from the database – all benign. Hence, rather than making a black-box call of whether a nodule is benign or malignant, the algorithm merely says: “This nodule resembles a benign nodule in our database.” The interpreting physician can then use the algorithm as a decision aid with confidence.

The overall accuracy of AiBx was 81.5%, sensitivity was 87.8%, and specificity was 78.5%. Positive predictive value was 65.9%.

As more images are added to the database, AiBx can easily be retrained and refined, said Dr. Thomas.

“It’s intuitive and explainable,” he added, noting that the algorithm is also a good teaching tool for residents and fellows.

“This AI model can be deployed as an app, integrated with [medical imaging systems] or hosted as a website. By using image-similarity AI models we can eliminate subjectivity and decrease the number of unnecessary biopsies,” he explained in the abstract accompanying the presentation.

However, he said that the algorithm as it currently stands has limitations: It has been tested on only 103 images thus far, and there’s the potential for selection bias.

Dr. Thomas* reported that, although he developed the AiBx algorithm, he has not drawn income or royalties from it. He reported no other relevant conflicts of interest.
 

SOURCE: Thomas* J et al. ATA 2019, Oral Abstract 27.

*Correction, 21/11/2019: An earlier version of this story misstated Dr. Thomas's last name.

Background: The standard of care for complex bone and joint infections includes the use of IV antibiotics. A prior meta-analysis suggested that the outcomes for bone and joint infections treated with oral and IV antibiotics are similar.

Dr. Roy is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School.

Background: The standard of care for complex bone and joint infections includes the use of IV antibiotics. A prior meta-analysis suggested that the outcomes for bone and joint infections treated with oral and IV antibiotics are similar.

Dr. Roy is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School.

Background: The standard of care for complex bone and joint infections includes the use of IV antibiotics. A prior meta-analysis suggested that the outcomes for bone and joint infections treated with oral and IV antibiotics are similar.

Dr. Roy is a hospitalist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School.