User login
Ibrutinib fights chronic GVHD in mice
Preclinical research suggests the anticancer agent ibrutinib can ameliorate chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).
Ibrutinib reduced the symptoms and progression of chronic GVHD in mouse models, and it decreased the activation of T and B cells isolated from patients with chronic GVHD.
These results indicate that T and B cells drive chronic GVHD and ibrutinib should be explored as a treatment option for human GVHD, according to investigators.
Bruce Blazar, MD, of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and his colleagues described this work in The Journal of Clinical Investigation.
The team noted that CD4+ T cells and B cells mediate chronic GVHD, so it follows that targeting these populations might inhibit chronic GVHD pathogenesis.
As ibrutinib targets Th2 cells and B cells, the investigators decided to test whether the drug could reverse established chronic GVHD in 2 mouse models—a model of T cell–driven sclerodermatous chronic GVHD and an alloantibody-driven, multiorgan-system chronic GVHD model that induces bronchiolar obliterans.
Sclerodermatous chronic GVHD
The researchers first found that ibrutinib can reduce the clinical signs of sclerodermatous chronic GVHD. Fourteen days after treatment began, vehicle-treated mice and those that received cyclosporine exhibited sclerodermatous lesions, hair loss, hunched posture, and scabbing. But ibrutinib-treated mice did not.
Animals treated with ibrutinib had a significantly lower overall intensity of chronic GVHD—as measured by body weight, posture, mobility, hair loss, skin lesions, and vitality—than vehicle-treated mice (P=0.0184).
Ibrutinib also extended the median time to chronic GVHD progression by 14 days when compared to control. Thirty-three percent of ibrutinib-treated mice remained progression-free, compared to 12% of vehicle-treated mice (P<0.02).
Overall survival was 100% among ibrutinib-treated mice, 82% for cyclosporine-treated mice, and 88% for vehicle-treated mice.
The investigators also discovered that prolonged administration of ibrutinib is needed to reap the maximum therapeutic benefit in sclerodermatous chronic GVHD. Withdrawing treatment at day 60 enabled clinical breakthrough of chronic GVHD in a single mouse.
Alloantibody-driven chronic GVHD
In this model, ibrutinib inhibited the development of bronchiolar obliterans, as measured by pulmonary resistance (P=0.0090), elastance (P=0.0019), and compliance (P=0.0071).
In addition, there was less peribroncheolar collagen fibrosis among ibrutinib-treated animals and a significant reduction in pulmonary fibrosis (P<0.0001) compared to vehicle-treated controls.
However, continued therapy was necessary to see a long-term benefit with ibrutinib. Prophylactic ibrutinib given from day -2 to day 28 was not effective against chronic GVHD or bronchiolar obliterans.
Lastly, the investigators found that ibrutinib reduced the overall size, cellularity, and number of germinal center reactions (P<0.001), and the drug eliminated pulmonary immunoglobulin deposition (P<0.001).
Verifying the results
Additional experiments showed that mice lacking Bruton tyrosine kinase and IL-2 inducible T-cell kinase (both of which are inhibited by ibrutinib) did not develop chronic GVHD, which suggests these molecules are necessary for the condition to occur.
The investigators also discovered that ibrutinib reduced the activation of T and B cells from patients with active chronic GVHD.
CD4+ T cells pretreated with ibrutinib had lower surface expression of CD69 after ex vivo T-cell receptor stimulation using anti-CD3 (P=0.033). And purified B cells pretreated with ibrutinib showed lower levels of pBTK-Y223, pPLCγ2-Y1217, and pERK1/2.
Dr Blazar and his colleagues said these results indicate that B cells and T cells drive chronic GVHD and suggest that ibrutinib should be considered for testing in clinical trials of chronic GVHD.
Preclinical research suggests the anticancer agent ibrutinib can ameliorate chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).
Ibrutinib reduced the symptoms and progression of chronic GVHD in mouse models, and it decreased the activation of T and B cells isolated from patients with chronic GVHD.
These results indicate that T and B cells drive chronic GVHD and ibrutinib should be explored as a treatment option for human GVHD, according to investigators.
Bruce Blazar, MD, of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and his colleagues described this work in The Journal of Clinical Investigation.
The team noted that CD4+ T cells and B cells mediate chronic GVHD, so it follows that targeting these populations might inhibit chronic GVHD pathogenesis.
As ibrutinib targets Th2 cells and B cells, the investigators decided to test whether the drug could reverse established chronic GVHD in 2 mouse models—a model of T cell–driven sclerodermatous chronic GVHD and an alloantibody-driven, multiorgan-system chronic GVHD model that induces bronchiolar obliterans.
Sclerodermatous chronic GVHD
The researchers first found that ibrutinib can reduce the clinical signs of sclerodermatous chronic GVHD. Fourteen days after treatment began, vehicle-treated mice and those that received cyclosporine exhibited sclerodermatous lesions, hair loss, hunched posture, and scabbing. But ibrutinib-treated mice did not.
Animals treated with ibrutinib had a significantly lower overall intensity of chronic GVHD—as measured by body weight, posture, mobility, hair loss, skin lesions, and vitality—than vehicle-treated mice (P=0.0184).
Ibrutinib also extended the median time to chronic GVHD progression by 14 days when compared to control. Thirty-three percent of ibrutinib-treated mice remained progression-free, compared to 12% of vehicle-treated mice (P<0.02).
Overall survival was 100% among ibrutinib-treated mice, 82% for cyclosporine-treated mice, and 88% for vehicle-treated mice.
The investigators also discovered that prolonged administration of ibrutinib is needed to reap the maximum therapeutic benefit in sclerodermatous chronic GVHD. Withdrawing treatment at day 60 enabled clinical breakthrough of chronic GVHD in a single mouse.
Alloantibody-driven chronic GVHD
In this model, ibrutinib inhibited the development of bronchiolar obliterans, as measured by pulmonary resistance (P=0.0090), elastance (P=0.0019), and compliance (P=0.0071).
In addition, there was less peribroncheolar collagen fibrosis among ibrutinib-treated animals and a significant reduction in pulmonary fibrosis (P<0.0001) compared to vehicle-treated controls.
However, continued therapy was necessary to see a long-term benefit with ibrutinib. Prophylactic ibrutinib given from day -2 to day 28 was not effective against chronic GVHD or bronchiolar obliterans.
Lastly, the investigators found that ibrutinib reduced the overall size, cellularity, and number of germinal center reactions (P<0.001), and the drug eliminated pulmonary immunoglobulin deposition (P<0.001).
Verifying the results
Additional experiments showed that mice lacking Bruton tyrosine kinase and IL-2 inducible T-cell kinase (both of which are inhibited by ibrutinib) did not develop chronic GVHD, which suggests these molecules are necessary for the condition to occur.
The investigators also discovered that ibrutinib reduced the activation of T and B cells from patients with active chronic GVHD.
CD4+ T cells pretreated with ibrutinib had lower surface expression of CD69 after ex vivo T-cell receptor stimulation using anti-CD3 (P=0.033). And purified B cells pretreated with ibrutinib showed lower levels of pBTK-Y223, pPLCγ2-Y1217, and pERK1/2.
Dr Blazar and his colleagues said these results indicate that B cells and T cells drive chronic GVHD and suggest that ibrutinib should be considered for testing in clinical trials of chronic GVHD.
Preclinical research suggests the anticancer agent ibrutinib can ameliorate chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).
Ibrutinib reduced the symptoms and progression of chronic GVHD in mouse models, and it decreased the activation of T and B cells isolated from patients with chronic GVHD.
These results indicate that T and B cells drive chronic GVHD and ibrutinib should be explored as a treatment option for human GVHD, according to investigators.
Bruce Blazar, MD, of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and his colleagues described this work in The Journal of Clinical Investigation.
The team noted that CD4+ T cells and B cells mediate chronic GVHD, so it follows that targeting these populations might inhibit chronic GVHD pathogenesis.
As ibrutinib targets Th2 cells and B cells, the investigators decided to test whether the drug could reverse established chronic GVHD in 2 mouse models—a model of T cell–driven sclerodermatous chronic GVHD and an alloantibody-driven, multiorgan-system chronic GVHD model that induces bronchiolar obliterans.
Sclerodermatous chronic GVHD
The researchers first found that ibrutinib can reduce the clinical signs of sclerodermatous chronic GVHD. Fourteen days after treatment began, vehicle-treated mice and those that received cyclosporine exhibited sclerodermatous lesions, hair loss, hunched posture, and scabbing. But ibrutinib-treated mice did not.
Animals treated with ibrutinib had a significantly lower overall intensity of chronic GVHD—as measured by body weight, posture, mobility, hair loss, skin lesions, and vitality—than vehicle-treated mice (P=0.0184).
Ibrutinib also extended the median time to chronic GVHD progression by 14 days when compared to control. Thirty-three percent of ibrutinib-treated mice remained progression-free, compared to 12% of vehicle-treated mice (P<0.02).
Overall survival was 100% among ibrutinib-treated mice, 82% for cyclosporine-treated mice, and 88% for vehicle-treated mice.
The investigators also discovered that prolonged administration of ibrutinib is needed to reap the maximum therapeutic benefit in sclerodermatous chronic GVHD. Withdrawing treatment at day 60 enabled clinical breakthrough of chronic GVHD in a single mouse.
Alloantibody-driven chronic GVHD
In this model, ibrutinib inhibited the development of bronchiolar obliterans, as measured by pulmonary resistance (P=0.0090), elastance (P=0.0019), and compliance (P=0.0071).
In addition, there was less peribroncheolar collagen fibrosis among ibrutinib-treated animals and a significant reduction in pulmonary fibrosis (P<0.0001) compared to vehicle-treated controls.
However, continued therapy was necessary to see a long-term benefit with ibrutinib. Prophylactic ibrutinib given from day -2 to day 28 was not effective against chronic GVHD or bronchiolar obliterans.
Lastly, the investigators found that ibrutinib reduced the overall size, cellularity, and number of germinal center reactions (P<0.001), and the drug eliminated pulmonary immunoglobulin deposition (P<0.001).
Verifying the results
Additional experiments showed that mice lacking Bruton tyrosine kinase and IL-2 inducible T-cell kinase (both of which are inhibited by ibrutinib) did not develop chronic GVHD, which suggests these molecules are necessary for the condition to occur.
The investigators also discovered that ibrutinib reduced the activation of T and B cells from patients with active chronic GVHD.
CD4+ T cells pretreated with ibrutinib had lower surface expression of CD69 after ex vivo T-cell receptor stimulation using anti-CD3 (P=0.033). And purified B cells pretreated with ibrutinib showed lower levels of pBTK-Y223, pPLCγ2-Y1217, and pERK1/2.
Dr Blazar and his colleagues said these results indicate that B cells and T cells drive chronic GVHD and suggest that ibrutinib should be considered for testing in clinical trials of chronic GVHD.
Group detects new steps in hematopoiesis
in the bone marrow
Researchers say they have discovered previously undetected steps in hematopoiesis, establishing that a highly complex series of events determine the fate of closely related populations of blood progenitor cells.
Their study revealed thousands of differences in gene expression between blood cell types.
These differences result from many specific events that are crucial for normal blood development, and errors in this process can lead to blood disorders.
The researchers described their work in Science.
The team sequenced RNA from 8 primary human hematopoietic progenitor populations representing the classical myeloid commitment stages of hematopoiesis and the main lymphoid stage.
This revealed 6711 genes and 10,724 transcripts enriched in non-protein-coding elements at early stages of differentiation.
The researchers also discovered the extent to which RNA is cut and pasted together in different ways during hematopoiesis, leading to specific forms of proteins for each of these stages.
“We have identified thousands of novel places where the RNA is processed in an alternative way,” said study author Willem Ouwehand, MD, PhD, of the University of Cambridge in the UK.
Specifically, the team identified 7881 novel splice junctions and 2301 differentially used alternative splicing events enriched in genes involved in regulatory processes.
“Such events changed the amount, structure, and behavior of proteins derived from a single gene,” said study author Wendy Erber, MD, DPhil, of the University of Western Australia in Crawley.
“Alternative proteins could drive stem cells towards becoming different mature blood cells.”
Until this study, hematopoiesis was relatively well understood at the level of DNA. What was not known was how the genetic information in DNA was then transcribed to generate RNA, leading to protein formation.
The researchers illustrated the importance of alternative RNA splicing in blood cell development by studying the role that 2 different forms of the same transcription factor—NFIB—play in megakaryocyte formation.
The team said their findings could have significant applications for patients with blood disorders. The results could aid the design of diagnostics and new therapies, as well as prove valuable for studies in stem cell transplant and for discovering the genetic basis of rare, inherited hematologic disorders.
in the bone marrow
Researchers say they have discovered previously undetected steps in hematopoiesis, establishing that a highly complex series of events determine the fate of closely related populations of blood progenitor cells.
Their study revealed thousands of differences in gene expression between blood cell types.
These differences result from many specific events that are crucial for normal blood development, and errors in this process can lead to blood disorders.
The researchers described their work in Science.
The team sequenced RNA from 8 primary human hematopoietic progenitor populations representing the classical myeloid commitment stages of hematopoiesis and the main lymphoid stage.
This revealed 6711 genes and 10,724 transcripts enriched in non-protein-coding elements at early stages of differentiation.
The researchers also discovered the extent to which RNA is cut and pasted together in different ways during hematopoiesis, leading to specific forms of proteins for each of these stages.
“We have identified thousands of novel places where the RNA is processed in an alternative way,” said study author Willem Ouwehand, MD, PhD, of the University of Cambridge in the UK.
Specifically, the team identified 7881 novel splice junctions and 2301 differentially used alternative splicing events enriched in genes involved in regulatory processes.
“Such events changed the amount, structure, and behavior of proteins derived from a single gene,” said study author Wendy Erber, MD, DPhil, of the University of Western Australia in Crawley.
“Alternative proteins could drive stem cells towards becoming different mature blood cells.”
Until this study, hematopoiesis was relatively well understood at the level of DNA. What was not known was how the genetic information in DNA was then transcribed to generate RNA, leading to protein formation.
The researchers illustrated the importance of alternative RNA splicing in blood cell development by studying the role that 2 different forms of the same transcription factor—NFIB—play in megakaryocyte formation.
The team said their findings could have significant applications for patients with blood disorders. The results could aid the design of diagnostics and new therapies, as well as prove valuable for studies in stem cell transplant and for discovering the genetic basis of rare, inherited hematologic disorders.
in the bone marrow
Researchers say they have discovered previously undetected steps in hematopoiesis, establishing that a highly complex series of events determine the fate of closely related populations of blood progenitor cells.
Their study revealed thousands of differences in gene expression between blood cell types.
These differences result from many specific events that are crucial for normal blood development, and errors in this process can lead to blood disorders.
The researchers described their work in Science.
The team sequenced RNA from 8 primary human hematopoietic progenitor populations representing the classical myeloid commitment stages of hematopoiesis and the main lymphoid stage.
This revealed 6711 genes and 10,724 transcripts enriched in non-protein-coding elements at early stages of differentiation.
The researchers also discovered the extent to which RNA is cut and pasted together in different ways during hematopoiesis, leading to specific forms of proteins for each of these stages.
“We have identified thousands of novel places where the RNA is processed in an alternative way,” said study author Willem Ouwehand, MD, PhD, of the University of Cambridge in the UK.
Specifically, the team identified 7881 novel splice junctions and 2301 differentially used alternative splicing events enriched in genes involved in regulatory processes.
“Such events changed the amount, structure, and behavior of proteins derived from a single gene,” said study author Wendy Erber, MD, DPhil, of the University of Western Australia in Crawley.
“Alternative proteins could drive stem cells towards becoming different mature blood cells.”
Until this study, hematopoiesis was relatively well understood at the level of DNA. What was not known was how the genetic information in DNA was then transcribed to generate RNA, leading to protein formation.
The researchers illustrated the importance of alternative RNA splicing in blood cell development by studying the role that 2 different forms of the same transcription factor—NFIB—play in megakaryocyte formation.
The team said their findings could have significant applications for patients with blood disorders. The results could aid the design of diagnostics and new therapies, as well as prove valuable for studies in stem cell transplant and for discovering the genetic basis of rare, inherited hematologic disorders.
HHS identifies known and likely carcinogens
Credit: Trevor MacInnis
The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has identified 1 chemical substance as a known human carcinogen and 3 additional substances as likely carcinogens.
Ortho-toluidine, which is used to make rubber chemicals, pesticides, and dyes, has been shown to cause urinary bladder cancer and is now listed as a known human carcinogen.
The 3 substances that are likely to be human carcinogens are 1-bromopropane, cumene, and pentachlorophenol.
1-bromopropane is used as a cleaning solvent and spray adhesive. Cumene is used to make phenol and acetone, and it is found in fuel products and tobacco smoke. Pentachlorophenol is a mixture used to preserve wood.
Exposure to pentachlorophenol is associated with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans and solid tumor malignancies in mice. Cumene and 1-bromopropane have been linked to solid tumor malignancies in mice as well.
All 4 substances are listed in the HHS’s 13th Report on Carcinogens, a science-based document prepared by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) that identifies chemical, biological, and physical agents considered to be cancer hazards for people living in the US.
The new report has a total of 243 listings, which includes known carcinogens and substances “reasonably anticipated” to be carcinogens.
“Identifying substances in our environment that can make people vulnerable to cancer will help in prevention efforts,” said Linda Birnbaum, PhD, director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the NTP.
“This report provides a valuable resource for health regulatory and research agencies, and it empowers the public with information people can use to reduce exposure to cancer-causing substances.”
New known carcinogen
Since 1983, ortho-toluidine has been listed in the HHS’s Report on Carcinogens as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen. However, new cancer studies led the NTP to reevaluate and reclassify ortho-toluidine. It is now classified as a known human carcinogen, based on clinical studies showing it causes urinary bladder cancer.
Ortho-toluidine is a synthetic chemical produced in other countries and imported into the US by several companies in high volumes. It is primarily used to make rubber chemicals, pesticides, and dyes. It is also used in some consumer and medical products.
People are mainly exposed through the workplace, by skin contact and/or inhalation when using ortho-toluidine. They can also be exposed outside the workplace through sources such as tobacco smoke.
Three new substances likely to be carcinogenic
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol and byproducts of its synthesis are complex mixtures of chemicals used as wood preservatives. Because virtually everyone exposed to pentachlorophenol is also exposed to its synthesis byproducts, they were evaluated together.
In the US, pentachlorophenol has been regulated since the 1980s as a restricted-use pesticide. It is used industrially for treating utility poles, wood pilings, fence posts, and lumber or timber for construction.
Most exposure has occurred in settings where workers treat lumber or come in contact with treated lumber. People may also be exposed to this mixture from breathing contaminated air or dust, or from contact with contaminated soil.
Exposure to this mixture was associated with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in clinical studies. In mice, it has been shown to cause tumors in the liver and other organs.
1-bromopropane
1-bromopropane is a liquid used as a solvent in many commercial industries. It is used as a cleaner for optics, electronics, and metals, as well as a solvent for aerosol-applied adhesives such as those used in foam cushion manufacturing.
It is also used in dry cleaning and in solvent sprays for aircraft maintenance. Workers in certain occupations may be more exposed to 1-bromopropane than the general population.
The NTP did not identify any clinical studies that evaluated the relationship between human cancer and exposure to 1-bromopropane. However, inhalation exposure to 1-bromopropane in rodents caused tumors in several organs, including the skin, lungs, and large intestine.
Cumene
Cumene is a flammable and volatile liquid with a gasoline-like odor. It is a natural component of coal tar and petroleum, and is found in tobacco smoke. It is used primarily to make acetone and phenol.
People are mainly exposed to cumene through the environment and in workplaces that use or produce cumene. It can be found in emissions from petroleum products.
Inhalation exposure to cumene caused lung tumors in male and female mice, and liver tumors in female mice. The NTP did not identify any clinical studies evaluating the relationship between cancer and exposure to cumene.
Credit: Trevor MacInnis
The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has identified 1 chemical substance as a known human carcinogen and 3 additional substances as likely carcinogens.
Ortho-toluidine, which is used to make rubber chemicals, pesticides, and dyes, has been shown to cause urinary bladder cancer and is now listed as a known human carcinogen.
The 3 substances that are likely to be human carcinogens are 1-bromopropane, cumene, and pentachlorophenol.
1-bromopropane is used as a cleaning solvent and spray adhesive. Cumene is used to make phenol and acetone, and it is found in fuel products and tobacco smoke. Pentachlorophenol is a mixture used to preserve wood.
Exposure to pentachlorophenol is associated with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans and solid tumor malignancies in mice. Cumene and 1-bromopropane have been linked to solid tumor malignancies in mice as well.
All 4 substances are listed in the HHS’s 13th Report on Carcinogens, a science-based document prepared by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) that identifies chemical, biological, and physical agents considered to be cancer hazards for people living in the US.
The new report has a total of 243 listings, which includes known carcinogens and substances “reasonably anticipated” to be carcinogens.
“Identifying substances in our environment that can make people vulnerable to cancer will help in prevention efforts,” said Linda Birnbaum, PhD, director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the NTP.
“This report provides a valuable resource for health regulatory and research agencies, and it empowers the public with information people can use to reduce exposure to cancer-causing substances.”
New known carcinogen
Since 1983, ortho-toluidine has been listed in the HHS’s Report on Carcinogens as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen. However, new cancer studies led the NTP to reevaluate and reclassify ortho-toluidine. It is now classified as a known human carcinogen, based on clinical studies showing it causes urinary bladder cancer.
Ortho-toluidine is a synthetic chemical produced in other countries and imported into the US by several companies in high volumes. It is primarily used to make rubber chemicals, pesticides, and dyes. It is also used in some consumer and medical products.
People are mainly exposed through the workplace, by skin contact and/or inhalation when using ortho-toluidine. They can also be exposed outside the workplace through sources such as tobacco smoke.
Three new substances likely to be carcinogenic
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol and byproducts of its synthesis are complex mixtures of chemicals used as wood preservatives. Because virtually everyone exposed to pentachlorophenol is also exposed to its synthesis byproducts, they were evaluated together.
In the US, pentachlorophenol has been regulated since the 1980s as a restricted-use pesticide. It is used industrially for treating utility poles, wood pilings, fence posts, and lumber or timber for construction.
Most exposure has occurred in settings where workers treat lumber or come in contact with treated lumber. People may also be exposed to this mixture from breathing contaminated air or dust, or from contact with contaminated soil.
Exposure to this mixture was associated with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in clinical studies. In mice, it has been shown to cause tumors in the liver and other organs.
1-bromopropane
1-bromopropane is a liquid used as a solvent in many commercial industries. It is used as a cleaner for optics, electronics, and metals, as well as a solvent for aerosol-applied adhesives such as those used in foam cushion manufacturing.
It is also used in dry cleaning and in solvent sprays for aircraft maintenance. Workers in certain occupations may be more exposed to 1-bromopropane than the general population.
The NTP did not identify any clinical studies that evaluated the relationship between human cancer and exposure to 1-bromopropane. However, inhalation exposure to 1-bromopropane in rodents caused tumors in several organs, including the skin, lungs, and large intestine.
Cumene
Cumene is a flammable and volatile liquid with a gasoline-like odor. It is a natural component of coal tar and petroleum, and is found in tobacco smoke. It is used primarily to make acetone and phenol.
People are mainly exposed to cumene through the environment and in workplaces that use or produce cumene. It can be found in emissions from petroleum products.
Inhalation exposure to cumene caused lung tumors in male and female mice, and liver tumors in female mice. The NTP did not identify any clinical studies evaluating the relationship between cancer and exposure to cumene.
Credit: Trevor MacInnis
The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has identified 1 chemical substance as a known human carcinogen and 3 additional substances as likely carcinogens.
Ortho-toluidine, which is used to make rubber chemicals, pesticides, and dyes, has been shown to cause urinary bladder cancer and is now listed as a known human carcinogen.
The 3 substances that are likely to be human carcinogens are 1-bromopropane, cumene, and pentachlorophenol.
1-bromopropane is used as a cleaning solvent and spray adhesive. Cumene is used to make phenol and acetone, and it is found in fuel products and tobacco smoke. Pentachlorophenol is a mixture used to preserve wood.
Exposure to pentachlorophenol is associated with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in humans and solid tumor malignancies in mice. Cumene and 1-bromopropane have been linked to solid tumor malignancies in mice as well.
All 4 substances are listed in the HHS’s 13th Report on Carcinogens, a science-based document prepared by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) that identifies chemical, biological, and physical agents considered to be cancer hazards for people living in the US.
The new report has a total of 243 listings, which includes known carcinogens and substances “reasonably anticipated” to be carcinogens.
“Identifying substances in our environment that can make people vulnerable to cancer will help in prevention efforts,” said Linda Birnbaum, PhD, director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the NTP.
“This report provides a valuable resource for health regulatory and research agencies, and it empowers the public with information people can use to reduce exposure to cancer-causing substances.”
New known carcinogen
Since 1983, ortho-toluidine has been listed in the HHS’s Report on Carcinogens as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen. However, new cancer studies led the NTP to reevaluate and reclassify ortho-toluidine. It is now classified as a known human carcinogen, based on clinical studies showing it causes urinary bladder cancer.
Ortho-toluidine is a synthetic chemical produced in other countries and imported into the US by several companies in high volumes. It is primarily used to make rubber chemicals, pesticides, and dyes. It is also used in some consumer and medical products.
People are mainly exposed through the workplace, by skin contact and/or inhalation when using ortho-toluidine. They can also be exposed outside the workplace through sources such as tobacco smoke.
Three new substances likely to be carcinogenic
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol and byproducts of its synthesis are complex mixtures of chemicals used as wood preservatives. Because virtually everyone exposed to pentachlorophenol is also exposed to its synthesis byproducts, they were evaluated together.
In the US, pentachlorophenol has been regulated since the 1980s as a restricted-use pesticide. It is used industrially for treating utility poles, wood pilings, fence posts, and lumber or timber for construction.
Most exposure has occurred in settings where workers treat lumber or come in contact with treated lumber. People may also be exposed to this mixture from breathing contaminated air or dust, or from contact with contaminated soil.
Exposure to this mixture was associated with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in clinical studies. In mice, it has been shown to cause tumors in the liver and other organs.
1-bromopropane
1-bromopropane is a liquid used as a solvent in many commercial industries. It is used as a cleaner for optics, electronics, and metals, as well as a solvent for aerosol-applied adhesives such as those used in foam cushion manufacturing.
It is also used in dry cleaning and in solvent sprays for aircraft maintenance. Workers in certain occupations may be more exposed to 1-bromopropane than the general population.
The NTP did not identify any clinical studies that evaluated the relationship between human cancer and exposure to 1-bromopropane. However, inhalation exposure to 1-bromopropane in rodents caused tumors in several organs, including the skin, lungs, and large intestine.
Cumene
Cumene is a flammable and volatile liquid with a gasoline-like odor. It is a natural component of coal tar and petroleum, and is found in tobacco smoke. It is used primarily to make acetone and phenol.
People are mainly exposed to cumene through the environment and in workplaces that use or produce cumene. It can be found in emissions from petroleum products.
Inhalation exposure to cumene caused lung tumors in male and female mice, and liver tumors in female mice. The NTP did not identify any clinical studies evaluating the relationship between cancer and exposure to cumene.
Results of VTE prophylaxis vary in otolaryngology patients
The effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis in otolaryngology patients undergoing surgery differs based on patient risk and the procedure, a new study suggests.
Overall, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was similar between patients who received prophylaxis and those who did not.
However, prophylaxis reduced the incidence of VTE in patients with a high Caprini risk score and those who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction.
On the other hand, there was an increased risk of bleeding complications associated with prophylaxis among patients who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction and in the cohort overall.
Vinita Bahl, DMD, of the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, and his colleagues conducted this research and recounted the results in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery.
The researchers analyzed 3498 patients treated by surgeons at an academic medical center between September 2003 and June 2010. The team assessed the incidence of VTE and bleeding complications in the 30 days after surgery.
In all, 1482 patients received VTE prophylaxis. Most (96.8%) received subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (5000 IU 2-3 times daily), 3.1% received enoxaparin (30-40 mg daily), and 0.1% received fondaparinux (2.5 mg daily).
The incidence of VTE among all patients was 1.3%—0.74% were deep vein thromboses and 0.66% were pulmonary emboli. The overall incidence of bleeding complications was 2.2%.
VTE occurred in 1.2% of patients who received prophylaxis and 1.3% of patients who did not (P=0.75).
Bleeding complications occurred in 3.5% and 1.2% of patients, respectively (P<0.001).
Patients with Caprini VTE risk scores greater than 7 were less likely to develop a VTE if they received perioperative prophylaxis—5.3% vs 10.4% (P=0.06).
Prophylaxis also decreased the incidence of VTE among patients who underwent free tissue transfer—2.1% vs 7.7% (P=0.002). But it increased bleeding complications—11.9% vs 4.5% (P=0.01).
Bleeding complications were associated with concomitant use of antiplatelet medications and VTE prophylaxis.
In all other patients, prophylaxis did not affect the incidence of VTE or bleeding. VTE occurred in 1% of treated and 0.6% of untreated patients (P=0.12). And bleeding occurred in 1.5% and 0.9% of patients, respectively (P=0.15).
These results suggest the Caprini risk assessment model is an effective tool to stratify otolaryngology patients according to VTE risk, the researchers said.
However, they believe additional research is needed before recommendations can be made for patients undergoing free tissue reconstruction, as prophylaxis reduced their risk of VTE but increased their risk of bleeding.
The effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis in otolaryngology patients undergoing surgery differs based on patient risk and the procedure, a new study suggests.
Overall, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was similar between patients who received prophylaxis and those who did not.
However, prophylaxis reduced the incidence of VTE in patients with a high Caprini risk score and those who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction.
On the other hand, there was an increased risk of bleeding complications associated with prophylaxis among patients who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction and in the cohort overall.
Vinita Bahl, DMD, of the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, and his colleagues conducted this research and recounted the results in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery.
The researchers analyzed 3498 patients treated by surgeons at an academic medical center between September 2003 and June 2010. The team assessed the incidence of VTE and bleeding complications in the 30 days after surgery.
In all, 1482 patients received VTE prophylaxis. Most (96.8%) received subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (5000 IU 2-3 times daily), 3.1% received enoxaparin (30-40 mg daily), and 0.1% received fondaparinux (2.5 mg daily).
The incidence of VTE among all patients was 1.3%—0.74% were deep vein thromboses and 0.66% were pulmonary emboli. The overall incidence of bleeding complications was 2.2%.
VTE occurred in 1.2% of patients who received prophylaxis and 1.3% of patients who did not (P=0.75).
Bleeding complications occurred in 3.5% and 1.2% of patients, respectively (P<0.001).
Patients with Caprini VTE risk scores greater than 7 were less likely to develop a VTE if they received perioperative prophylaxis—5.3% vs 10.4% (P=0.06).
Prophylaxis also decreased the incidence of VTE among patients who underwent free tissue transfer—2.1% vs 7.7% (P=0.002). But it increased bleeding complications—11.9% vs 4.5% (P=0.01).
Bleeding complications were associated with concomitant use of antiplatelet medications and VTE prophylaxis.
In all other patients, prophylaxis did not affect the incidence of VTE or bleeding. VTE occurred in 1% of treated and 0.6% of untreated patients (P=0.12). And bleeding occurred in 1.5% and 0.9% of patients, respectively (P=0.15).
These results suggest the Caprini risk assessment model is an effective tool to stratify otolaryngology patients according to VTE risk, the researchers said.
However, they believe additional research is needed before recommendations can be made for patients undergoing free tissue reconstruction, as prophylaxis reduced their risk of VTE but increased their risk of bleeding.
The effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis in otolaryngology patients undergoing surgery differs based on patient risk and the procedure, a new study suggests.
Overall, the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was similar between patients who received prophylaxis and those who did not.
However, prophylaxis reduced the incidence of VTE in patients with a high Caprini risk score and those who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction.
On the other hand, there was an increased risk of bleeding complications associated with prophylaxis among patients who underwent microvascular free tissue reconstruction and in the cohort overall.
Vinita Bahl, DMD, of the University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, and his colleagues conducted this research and recounted the results in JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery.
The researchers analyzed 3498 patients treated by surgeons at an academic medical center between September 2003 and June 2010. The team assessed the incidence of VTE and bleeding complications in the 30 days after surgery.
In all, 1482 patients received VTE prophylaxis. Most (96.8%) received subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (5000 IU 2-3 times daily), 3.1% received enoxaparin (30-40 mg daily), and 0.1% received fondaparinux (2.5 mg daily).
The incidence of VTE among all patients was 1.3%—0.74% were deep vein thromboses and 0.66% were pulmonary emboli. The overall incidence of bleeding complications was 2.2%.
VTE occurred in 1.2% of patients who received prophylaxis and 1.3% of patients who did not (P=0.75).
Bleeding complications occurred in 3.5% and 1.2% of patients, respectively (P<0.001).
Patients with Caprini VTE risk scores greater than 7 were less likely to develop a VTE if they received perioperative prophylaxis—5.3% vs 10.4% (P=0.06).
Prophylaxis also decreased the incidence of VTE among patients who underwent free tissue transfer—2.1% vs 7.7% (P=0.002). But it increased bleeding complications—11.9% vs 4.5% (P=0.01).
Bleeding complications were associated with concomitant use of antiplatelet medications and VTE prophylaxis.
In all other patients, prophylaxis did not affect the incidence of VTE or bleeding. VTE occurred in 1% of treated and 0.6% of untreated patients (P=0.12). And bleeding occurred in 1.5% and 0.9% of patients, respectively (P=0.15).
These results suggest the Caprini risk assessment model is an effective tool to stratify otolaryngology patients according to VTE risk, the researchers said.
However, they believe additional research is needed before recommendations can be made for patients undergoing free tissue reconstruction, as prophylaxis reduced their risk of VTE but increased their risk of bleeding.
Gout may predispose people, particularly women, to diabetes
Screen for diabetes and aggressively manage risk factors in patients with gout, especially women, investigators concluded from a retrospective, matched cohort study published Oct. 2 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
They found that women have a 71% greater risk of developing diabetes if they have gout (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.93; P less than .001), and men with gout have a 22% greater risk (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31; P less than .001), compared with the general population.
The study “suggests that gout may be independently associated with an increased risk of diabetes. These findings were independent of BMI [body mass index], lifestyle factors, and other known risk factors. The magnitude of excess diabetes risk in gout was significantly larger among women than men, both in risk difference and relative risk, and these findings persisted across all age categories. These findings support aggressive management of risk factors of diabetes in patients with gout,” concluded senior investigator Dr. Hyon K. Choi and his colleagues at Boston University (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014 Oct. 2 [doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205827]).
Using 15 years’ worth of data from the U.K. Health Improvement Network, which contains the records of about 7.3 million patients, the investigators matched 35,339 patients with newly diagnosed gout with up to 5 control subjects for age, sex, and BMI; they then looked to see who subsequently developed diabetes.
Among patients with gout, there were 10.1 cases of new-onset diabetes in women and 9.5 cases in men per 1,000 person-years. Among the 137,056 controls without gout, there were 5.6 cases of new-onset diabetes in women and 7.2 cases in men per 1,000 person-years.
After adjustment for smoking, alcohol consumption, physician visits, comorbidities, medication use, and BMI as a continuous variable, gout increased the risk of diabetes by 48% in women (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.29-1.68; P less than .001) and by 15% in men (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.24; P less than .001). The sex difference persisted across age groups.
Gout patients consumed more alcohol, visited their doctor more often, had more health problems, and took steroids and diuretics more frequently than did those who did not have gout. Overall, 72.4% of the gout cases were in men with a mean age of 62.7 years; the rest were in women, but women with gout tended to be a bit older, with a mean age of 67.9 years.
Perhaps, “low-grade inflammation among patients with gout promote[s] the diabetogenic process,” the investigators wrote. “Alternatively, the link may stem from the shared metabolic factors of the two conditions, such as the correlates of the metabolic syndrome or shared genes. Furthermore, the link between hyperuricemia and the risk of type 2 diabetes may originate at the renal level, as insulin resistance and higher insulin levels are known to reduce renal excretion of urate,” they noted.
It’s unclear why women seem to be more affected. “SUA [serum uric acid] levels in men are about 1 mg/dL higher than in women during adulthood, although levels in women increase around natural menopause. Thus, the physiological impact of uric acid levels, which are high enough to cause gout, could be stronger among women than men. Furthermore, female gout patients may have higher SUA levels on average than male gout patients, which could also contribute to a larger association with the risk of diabetes among women,” they suggested.
Dr. Choi previously linked gout to the development of diabetes, but only in men with high cardiovascular risk profiles (Rheumatology 2008;47:1567-70).
The investigators had no disclosures. The work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Screen for diabetes and aggressively manage risk factors in patients with gout, especially women, investigators concluded from a retrospective, matched cohort study published Oct. 2 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
They found that women have a 71% greater risk of developing diabetes if they have gout (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.93; P less than .001), and men with gout have a 22% greater risk (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31; P less than .001), compared with the general population.
The study “suggests that gout may be independently associated with an increased risk of diabetes. These findings were independent of BMI [body mass index], lifestyle factors, and other known risk factors. The magnitude of excess diabetes risk in gout was significantly larger among women than men, both in risk difference and relative risk, and these findings persisted across all age categories. These findings support aggressive management of risk factors of diabetes in patients with gout,” concluded senior investigator Dr. Hyon K. Choi and his colleagues at Boston University (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014 Oct. 2 [doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205827]).
Using 15 years’ worth of data from the U.K. Health Improvement Network, which contains the records of about 7.3 million patients, the investigators matched 35,339 patients with newly diagnosed gout with up to 5 control subjects for age, sex, and BMI; they then looked to see who subsequently developed diabetes.
Among patients with gout, there were 10.1 cases of new-onset diabetes in women and 9.5 cases in men per 1,000 person-years. Among the 137,056 controls without gout, there were 5.6 cases of new-onset diabetes in women and 7.2 cases in men per 1,000 person-years.
After adjustment for smoking, alcohol consumption, physician visits, comorbidities, medication use, and BMI as a continuous variable, gout increased the risk of diabetes by 48% in women (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.29-1.68; P less than .001) and by 15% in men (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.24; P less than .001). The sex difference persisted across age groups.
Gout patients consumed more alcohol, visited their doctor more often, had more health problems, and took steroids and diuretics more frequently than did those who did not have gout. Overall, 72.4% of the gout cases were in men with a mean age of 62.7 years; the rest were in women, but women with gout tended to be a bit older, with a mean age of 67.9 years.
Perhaps, “low-grade inflammation among patients with gout promote[s] the diabetogenic process,” the investigators wrote. “Alternatively, the link may stem from the shared metabolic factors of the two conditions, such as the correlates of the metabolic syndrome or shared genes. Furthermore, the link between hyperuricemia and the risk of type 2 diabetes may originate at the renal level, as insulin resistance and higher insulin levels are known to reduce renal excretion of urate,” they noted.
It’s unclear why women seem to be more affected. “SUA [serum uric acid] levels in men are about 1 mg/dL higher than in women during adulthood, although levels in women increase around natural menopause. Thus, the physiological impact of uric acid levels, which are high enough to cause gout, could be stronger among women than men. Furthermore, female gout patients may have higher SUA levels on average than male gout patients, which could also contribute to a larger association with the risk of diabetes among women,” they suggested.
Dr. Choi previously linked gout to the development of diabetes, but only in men with high cardiovascular risk profiles (Rheumatology 2008;47:1567-70).
The investigators had no disclosures. The work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Screen for diabetes and aggressively manage risk factors in patients with gout, especially women, investigators concluded from a retrospective, matched cohort study published Oct. 2 in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.
They found that women have a 71% greater risk of developing diabetes if they have gout (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.93; P less than .001), and men with gout have a 22% greater risk (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31; P less than .001), compared with the general population.
The study “suggests that gout may be independently associated with an increased risk of diabetes. These findings were independent of BMI [body mass index], lifestyle factors, and other known risk factors. The magnitude of excess diabetes risk in gout was significantly larger among women than men, both in risk difference and relative risk, and these findings persisted across all age categories. These findings support aggressive management of risk factors of diabetes in patients with gout,” concluded senior investigator Dr. Hyon K. Choi and his colleagues at Boston University (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2014 Oct. 2 [doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205827]).
Using 15 years’ worth of data from the U.K. Health Improvement Network, which contains the records of about 7.3 million patients, the investigators matched 35,339 patients with newly diagnosed gout with up to 5 control subjects for age, sex, and BMI; they then looked to see who subsequently developed diabetes.
Among patients with gout, there were 10.1 cases of new-onset diabetes in women and 9.5 cases in men per 1,000 person-years. Among the 137,056 controls without gout, there were 5.6 cases of new-onset diabetes in women and 7.2 cases in men per 1,000 person-years.
After adjustment for smoking, alcohol consumption, physician visits, comorbidities, medication use, and BMI as a continuous variable, gout increased the risk of diabetes by 48% in women (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.29-1.68; P less than .001) and by 15% in men (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.24; P less than .001). The sex difference persisted across age groups.
Gout patients consumed more alcohol, visited their doctor more often, had more health problems, and took steroids and diuretics more frequently than did those who did not have gout. Overall, 72.4% of the gout cases were in men with a mean age of 62.7 years; the rest were in women, but women with gout tended to be a bit older, with a mean age of 67.9 years.
Perhaps, “low-grade inflammation among patients with gout promote[s] the diabetogenic process,” the investigators wrote. “Alternatively, the link may stem from the shared metabolic factors of the two conditions, such as the correlates of the metabolic syndrome or shared genes. Furthermore, the link between hyperuricemia and the risk of type 2 diabetes may originate at the renal level, as insulin resistance and higher insulin levels are known to reduce renal excretion of urate,” they noted.
It’s unclear why women seem to be more affected. “SUA [serum uric acid] levels in men are about 1 mg/dL higher than in women during adulthood, although levels in women increase around natural menopause. Thus, the physiological impact of uric acid levels, which are high enough to cause gout, could be stronger among women than men. Furthermore, female gout patients may have higher SUA levels on average than male gout patients, which could also contribute to a larger association with the risk of diabetes among women,” they suggested.
Dr. Choi previously linked gout to the development of diabetes, but only in men with high cardiovascular risk profiles (Rheumatology 2008;47:1567-70).
The investigators had no disclosures. The work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
FROM ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Key clinical point: Be on the lookout for diabetes in your gout patients.
Major finding: Women have a 71% greater risk of developing diabetes if they have gout (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.51-1.93; P less than .001), and men with gout have a 22% greater risk (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31; P less than .001), compared with the general population.
Data source: Retrospective database study of more than 170,000 patients.
Disclosures: The investigators had no disclosures. The work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.
Urinary incontinence – An individual and societal ill
Urinary incontinence is a major health care concern, both in terms of the numbers of women who are suffering and with respect to societal costs and the impact on health care spending. Approximately 15 years ago, an international group reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association that 200 million people worldwide – 75%-80% of them women – were suffering from urinary incontinence (JAMA 1998;280:951-3).
Since then, a high prevalence of urinary incontinence has been documented in various studies and reports. Experts have estimated, for instance, that between 13 million and 25 million adult Americans experience transient or chronic symptoms, and that approximately half of these patients suffer from severe or bothersome symptoms. Again, the majority of these individuals are women.
Consumer-based research suggests that 25% of women over the age of 18 years experience episodes of urinary incontinence, according to prevalence data collected by the National Association for Continence. In 2001, 10% of women under the age of 65 years and 35% of women over 65 had symptoms of involuntary leakage, according to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Despite this, nearly two-thirds of patients never discussed bladder health with their health care provider and on average, women wait over 6 years from symptom onset before a diagnosis is established. Moreover, the costs are significant; in 2001, the cost for urinary incontinence in the United States was $16.3 billion (Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;98:398-406).
There are four types of urinary incontinence – urge, stress, mixed, and overflow. Urge incontinence typically is accompanied by urgency. Stress incontinence occurs with the increased abdominal pressure that accompanies effort, exertion, laughing, coughing, and sneezing. Overflow incontinence generally involves continuous urinary loss and incomplete bladder emptying.
Over the next four installments of Master Class in Gynecologic Surgery, I have chosen to feature the workup and treatment of urinary incontinence. For our first installment, I have asked my former resident Dr. Sandra Culbertson, who is now a professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago, to share her knowledge of the optimal approach for evaluating urinary incontinence in the office. As she explains, it is critical to discern the uncomplicated cases of stress urinary incontinence from possibly complicated cases that require more assessment.
Dr. Miller is clinical associate professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, immediate past president of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), and a past president of the AAGL. He is a reproductive endocrinologist and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon in private practice in Naperville, Ill., and Schaumburg, Ill.; the director of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and the director of the AAGL/SRS fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery at Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Ill.; and the medical editor of this column, Master Class. Dr. Miller had no relevant financial disclosures.
Urinary incontinence is a major health care concern, both in terms of the numbers of women who are suffering and with respect to societal costs and the impact on health care spending. Approximately 15 years ago, an international group reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association that 200 million people worldwide – 75%-80% of them women – were suffering from urinary incontinence (JAMA 1998;280:951-3).
Since then, a high prevalence of urinary incontinence has been documented in various studies and reports. Experts have estimated, for instance, that between 13 million and 25 million adult Americans experience transient or chronic symptoms, and that approximately half of these patients suffer from severe or bothersome symptoms. Again, the majority of these individuals are women.
Consumer-based research suggests that 25% of women over the age of 18 years experience episodes of urinary incontinence, according to prevalence data collected by the National Association for Continence. In 2001, 10% of women under the age of 65 years and 35% of women over 65 had symptoms of involuntary leakage, according to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Despite this, nearly two-thirds of patients never discussed bladder health with their health care provider and on average, women wait over 6 years from symptom onset before a diagnosis is established. Moreover, the costs are significant; in 2001, the cost for urinary incontinence in the United States was $16.3 billion (Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;98:398-406).
There are four types of urinary incontinence – urge, stress, mixed, and overflow. Urge incontinence typically is accompanied by urgency. Stress incontinence occurs with the increased abdominal pressure that accompanies effort, exertion, laughing, coughing, and sneezing. Overflow incontinence generally involves continuous urinary loss and incomplete bladder emptying.
Over the next four installments of Master Class in Gynecologic Surgery, I have chosen to feature the workup and treatment of urinary incontinence. For our first installment, I have asked my former resident Dr. Sandra Culbertson, who is now a professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago, to share her knowledge of the optimal approach for evaluating urinary incontinence in the office. As she explains, it is critical to discern the uncomplicated cases of stress urinary incontinence from possibly complicated cases that require more assessment.
Dr. Miller is clinical associate professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, immediate past president of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), and a past president of the AAGL. He is a reproductive endocrinologist and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon in private practice in Naperville, Ill., and Schaumburg, Ill.; the director of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and the director of the AAGL/SRS fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery at Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Ill.; and the medical editor of this column, Master Class. Dr. Miller had no relevant financial disclosures.
Urinary incontinence is a major health care concern, both in terms of the numbers of women who are suffering and with respect to societal costs and the impact on health care spending. Approximately 15 years ago, an international group reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association that 200 million people worldwide – 75%-80% of them women – were suffering from urinary incontinence (JAMA 1998;280:951-3).
Since then, a high prevalence of urinary incontinence has been documented in various studies and reports. Experts have estimated, for instance, that between 13 million and 25 million adult Americans experience transient or chronic symptoms, and that approximately half of these patients suffer from severe or bothersome symptoms. Again, the majority of these individuals are women.
Consumer-based research suggests that 25% of women over the age of 18 years experience episodes of urinary incontinence, according to prevalence data collected by the National Association for Continence. In 2001, 10% of women under the age of 65 years and 35% of women over 65 had symptoms of involuntary leakage, according to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Despite this, nearly two-thirds of patients never discussed bladder health with their health care provider and on average, women wait over 6 years from symptom onset before a diagnosis is established. Moreover, the costs are significant; in 2001, the cost for urinary incontinence in the United States was $16.3 billion (Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;98:398-406).
There are four types of urinary incontinence – urge, stress, mixed, and overflow. Urge incontinence typically is accompanied by urgency. Stress incontinence occurs with the increased abdominal pressure that accompanies effort, exertion, laughing, coughing, and sneezing. Overflow incontinence generally involves continuous urinary loss and incomplete bladder emptying.
Over the next four installments of Master Class in Gynecologic Surgery, I have chosen to feature the workup and treatment of urinary incontinence. For our first installment, I have asked my former resident Dr. Sandra Culbertson, who is now a professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago, to share her knowledge of the optimal approach for evaluating urinary incontinence in the office. As she explains, it is critical to discern the uncomplicated cases of stress urinary incontinence from possibly complicated cases that require more assessment.
Dr. Miller is clinical associate professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago, immediate past president of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), and a past president of the AAGL. He is a reproductive endocrinologist and minimally invasive gynecologic surgeon in private practice in Naperville, Ill., and Schaumburg, Ill.; the director of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery and the director of the AAGL/SRS fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery at Advocate Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Ill.; and the medical editor of this column, Master Class. Dr. Miller had no relevant financial disclosures.
Shrink Rap News: Belgian prison case signals warning for American correctional psychiatrists
I struggled to decide where to begin this week’s column in the wake of news that a Belgian inmate had been granted his request for physician-assisted suicide. Beyond stifling an instinctive “oh my god” response, I felt an immediate regret that I predicted something like this would happen eventually when I wrote about state laws regarding assisted suicide for a previous column. I just didn’t expect it to happen quite so soon, or to involve a prison inmate.
According to an Associated Press story published in the Washington Post, inmate Frank Van Den Bleeken had served almost 30 years for the rape and murder of an unspecified number of women, and had requested euthanasia on the basis of having a mental condition deemed incurable by the Belgian courts. The story didn’t specify exactly what that condition was, or why it was untreatable, but the inmate alleged that he couldn’t live with the knowledge that he would be a danger to society again upon release. I’m surprised at this newly developed sense of conscience, since it apparently wasn’t enough to prevent him from committing the crimes in the first place. If his incurable condition was sociopathy, then some intervention must have worked to lead to this remarkable development of empathy. Setting skepticism aside, the case does raise serious concerns for psychiatrists working in jails and prisons.
Adopted in 2002, the Belgian law defines euthanasia as “intentionally terminating life by someone other than the person concerned, at the latter’s request.” The individual making the request must do so competently and without external pressure if his condition is “constant and medically futile,” leading to “unbearable physical or mental suffering that cannot be alleviated.” A physician cannot be compelled to perform the killing but must notify the patient of the refusal and must forward the patient’s medical record to another physician of the patient’s choosing.
It seems we’ve arrived at a strange mirror-inverse world of medicine in correctional health care now. Given that the World Health Organization has proscribed the force feeding of prisoners, a correctional physician may not only be forbidden from intervening to save a life, he may also be called upon to intentionally end one. If there were ever a situation that calls for scrupulous medical integrity, this is it.
I’m not shocked by the thought that an inmate might request suicide. Most prisoners are young, are male, and have active substance use disorders – three commonly accepted risk factors for suicide – even before walking into the facility. What concerns me more is the thought that in all likelihood, requests for assisted suicide by prisoners are going to be considered less carefully than those by noncriminals. Given the horrific nature of some offenses, it would be easy to imagine a court turning a semiblind eye to other factors influencing a request to die. It would be easy to view suicide as a rational choice for someone serving a life term, rather than as a product of a treatable psychiatric condition. Courts might also be unwilling to examine the underlying conditions of confinement or an institutional culture that would lead one to accept death as a viable alternative to life in a threatening or inhumane environment. Prisoners are also less likely to have outside supports or involved family members to provide more factual context to the decision to seek physician-assisted suicide, or to challenge the competence of the petitioner. The institution itself might be unwilling to acknowledge inadequate health care services, or lack of palliative care, for terminally ill prisoners.
Belgium and the Netherlands have expanded physician-assisted suicide processes far beyond anything presently contemplated here in the United States, but petitions for assisted suicide have been increasing there year after year, and an increasing number of American states have been considering this legislation. As the Van Den Bleeken case illustrates, only the professional integrity of physicians may stand between poorly considered laws and a select group of vulnerable human beings.
Dr. Hanson is a forensic psychiatrist and coauthor of Shrink Rap: Three Psychiatrists Explain Their Work. The opinions expressed are those of the author only, and do not represent those of any of Dr. Hanson’s employers or consultees, including the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene or the Maryland Division of Correction.
I struggled to decide where to begin this week’s column in the wake of news that a Belgian inmate had been granted his request for physician-assisted suicide. Beyond stifling an instinctive “oh my god” response, I felt an immediate regret that I predicted something like this would happen eventually when I wrote about state laws regarding assisted suicide for a previous column. I just didn’t expect it to happen quite so soon, or to involve a prison inmate.
According to an Associated Press story published in the Washington Post, inmate Frank Van Den Bleeken had served almost 30 years for the rape and murder of an unspecified number of women, and had requested euthanasia on the basis of having a mental condition deemed incurable by the Belgian courts. The story didn’t specify exactly what that condition was, or why it was untreatable, but the inmate alleged that he couldn’t live with the knowledge that he would be a danger to society again upon release. I’m surprised at this newly developed sense of conscience, since it apparently wasn’t enough to prevent him from committing the crimes in the first place. If his incurable condition was sociopathy, then some intervention must have worked to lead to this remarkable development of empathy. Setting skepticism aside, the case does raise serious concerns for psychiatrists working in jails and prisons.
Adopted in 2002, the Belgian law defines euthanasia as “intentionally terminating life by someone other than the person concerned, at the latter’s request.” The individual making the request must do so competently and without external pressure if his condition is “constant and medically futile,” leading to “unbearable physical or mental suffering that cannot be alleviated.” A physician cannot be compelled to perform the killing but must notify the patient of the refusal and must forward the patient’s medical record to another physician of the patient’s choosing.
It seems we’ve arrived at a strange mirror-inverse world of medicine in correctional health care now. Given that the World Health Organization has proscribed the force feeding of prisoners, a correctional physician may not only be forbidden from intervening to save a life, he may also be called upon to intentionally end one. If there were ever a situation that calls for scrupulous medical integrity, this is it.
I’m not shocked by the thought that an inmate might request suicide. Most prisoners are young, are male, and have active substance use disorders – three commonly accepted risk factors for suicide – even before walking into the facility. What concerns me more is the thought that in all likelihood, requests for assisted suicide by prisoners are going to be considered less carefully than those by noncriminals. Given the horrific nature of some offenses, it would be easy to imagine a court turning a semiblind eye to other factors influencing a request to die. It would be easy to view suicide as a rational choice for someone serving a life term, rather than as a product of a treatable psychiatric condition. Courts might also be unwilling to examine the underlying conditions of confinement or an institutional culture that would lead one to accept death as a viable alternative to life in a threatening or inhumane environment. Prisoners are also less likely to have outside supports or involved family members to provide more factual context to the decision to seek physician-assisted suicide, or to challenge the competence of the petitioner. The institution itself might be unwilling to acknowledge inadequate health care services, or lack of palliative care, for terminally ill prisoners.
Belgium and the Netherlands have expanded physician-assisted suicide processes far beyond anything presently contemplated here in the United States, but petitions for assisted suicide have been increasing there year after year, and an increasing number of American states have been considering this legislation. As the Van Den Bleeken case illustrates, only the professional integrity of physicians may stand between poorly considered laws and a select group of vulnerable human beings.
Dr. Hanson is a forensic psychiatrist and coauthor of Shrink Rap: Three Psychiatrists Explain Their Work. The opinions expressed are those of the author only, and do not represent those of any of Dr. Hanson’s employers or consultees, including the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene or the Maryland Division of Correction.
I struggled to decide where to begin this week’s column in the wake of news that a Belgian inmate had been granted his request for physician-assisted suicide. Beyond stifling an instinctive “oh my god” response, I felt an immediate regret that I predicted something like this would happen eventually when I wrote about state laws regarding assisted suicide for a previous column. I just didn’t expect it to happen quite so soon, or to involve a prison inmate.
According to an Associated Press story published in the Washington Post, inmate Frank Van Den Bleeken had served almost 30 years for the rape and murder of an unspecified number of women, and had requested euthanasia on the basis of having a mental condition deemed incurable by the Belgian courts. The story didn’t specify exactly what that condition was, or why it was untreatable, but the inmate alleged that he couldn’t live with the knowledge that he would be a danger to society again upon release. I’m surprised at this newly developed sense of conscience, since it apparently wasn’t enough to prevent him from committing the crimes in the first place. If his incurable condition was sociopathy, then some intervention must have worked to lead to this remarkable development of empathy. Setting skepticism aside, the case does raise serious concerns for psychiatrists working in jails and prisons.
Adopted in 2002, the Belgian law defines euthanasia as “intentionally terminating life by someone other than the person concerned, at the latter’s request.” The individual making the request must do so competently and without external pressure if his condition is “constant and medically futile,” leading to “unbearable physical or mental suffering that cannot be alleviated.” A physician cannot be compelled to perform the killing but must notify the patient of the refusal and must forward the patient’s medical record to another physician of the patient’s choosing.
It seems we’ve arrived at a strange mirror-inverse world of medicine in correctional health care now. Given that the World Health Organization has proscribed the force feeding of prisoners, a correctional physician may not only be forbidden from intervening to save a life, he may also be called upon to intentionally end one. If there were ever a situation that calls for scrupulous medical integrity, this is it.
I’m not shocked by the thought that an inmate might request suicide. Most prisoners are young, are male, and have active substance use disorders – three commonly accepted risk factors for suicide – even before walking into the facility. What concerns me more is the thought that in all likelihood, requests for assisted suicide by prisoners are going to be considered less carefully than those by noncriminals. Given the horrific nature of some offenses, it would be easy to imagine a court turning a semiblind eye to other factors influencing a request to die. It would be easy to view suicide as a rational choice for someone serving a life term, rather than as a product of a treatable psychiatric condition. Courts might also be unwilling to examine the underlying conditions of confinement or an institutional culture that would lead one to accept death as a viable alternative to life in a threatening or inhumane environment. Prisoners are also less likely to have outside supports or involved family members to provide more factual context to the decision to seek physician-assisted suicide, or to challenge the competence of the petitioner. The institution itself might be unwilling to acknowledge inadequate health care services, or lack of palliative care, for terminally ill prisoners.
Belgium and the Netherlands have expanded physician-assisted suicide processes far beyond anything presently contemplated here in the United States, but petitions for assisted suicide have been increasing there year after year, and an increasing number of American states have been considering this legislation. As the Van Den Bleeken case illustrates, only the professional integrity of physicians may stand between poorly considered laws and a select group of vulnerable human beings.
Dr. Hanson is a forensic psychiatrist and coauthor of Shrink Rap: Three Psychiatrists Explain Their Work. The opinions expressed are those of the author only, and do not represent those of any of Dr. Hanson’s employers or consultees, including the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene or the Maryland Division of Correction.
AUDIO: Franchiser hopes to put dermatology ‘back in the hands of the dermatologist’
Dermatology has yet to conquer the cosmetic corner of the specialty. That’s according to Dr. Leslie S. Baumann of the Miami-based Skin Type Solutions, who explains a new franchise model she says will help “put dermatology back in the hands of dermatologists.”
In this interview, Dr. Baumann, who writes the Cosmeceutical Critique column for Skin & Allergy News, explains her new franchise method for selling skin care products in the dermatologist’s office, and why she thinks it will “disrupt” business as usual in the retail skin care marketplace, including for online retailers.
Dr. Baumann is chief executive officer of the Baumann Cosmetic & Research Institute in the Design District in Miami. She founded the cosmetic dermatology center at the University of Miami in 1997. Dr. Baumann wrote the textbook “Cosmetic Dermatology: Principles and Practice” (McGraw-Hill, April 2002), and a book for consumers, “The Skin Type Solution” (Bantam, 2006). She has contributed to the Cosmeceutical Critique column in Skin & Allergy News since January 2001. Her latest book, “Cosmeceuticals and Cosmetic Ingredients,” will be published in November 2014. Dr. Baumann has received funding for clinical grants from Allergan, Aveeno, Avon Products, Evolus, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Kythera, Mary Kay, Medicis Pharmaceuticals, Neutrogena, Philosophy,Topix Pharmaceuticals, and Unilever.
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Dermatology has yet to conquer the cosmetic corner of the specialty. That’s according to Dr. Leslie S. Baumann of the Miami-based Skin Type Solutions, who explains a new franchise model she says will help “put dermatology back in the hands of dermatologists.”
In this interview, Dr. Baumann, who writes the Cosmeceutical Critique column for Skin & Allergy News, explains her new franchise method for selling skin care products in the dermatologist’s office, and why she thinks it will “disrupt” business as usual in the retail skin care marketplace, including for online retailers.
Dr. Baumann is chief executive officer of the Baumann Cosmetic & Research Institute in the Design District in Miami. She founded the cosmetic dermatology center at the University of Miami in 1997. Dr. Baumann wrote the textbook “Cosmetic Dermatology: Principles and Practice” (McGraw-Hill, April 2002), and a book for consumers, “The Skin Type Solution” (Bantam, 2006). She has contributed to the Cosmeceutical Critique column in Skin & Allergy News since January 2001. Her latest book, “Cosmeceuticals and Cosmetic Ingredients,” will be published in November 2014. Dr. Baumann has received funding for clinical grants from Allergan, Aveeno, Avon Products, Evolus, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Kythera, Mary Kay, Medicis Pharmaceuticals, Neutrogena, Philosophy,Topix Pharmaceuticals, and Unilever.
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Dermatology has yet to conquer the cosmetic corner of the specialty. That’s according to Dr. Leslie S. Baumann of the Miami-based Skin Type Solutions, who explains a new franchise model she says will help “put dermatology back in the hands of dermatologists.”
In this interview, Dr. Baumann, who writes the Cosmeceutical Critique column for Skin & Allergy News, explains her new franchise method for selling skin care products in the dermatologist’s office, and why she thinks it will “disrupt” business as usual in the retail skin care marketplace, including for online retailers.
Dr. Baumann is chief executive officer of the Baumann Cosmetic & Research Institute in the Design District in Miami. She founded the cosmetic dermatology center at the University of Miami in 1997. Dr. Baumann wrote the textbook “Cosmetic Dermatology: Principles and Practice” (McGraw-Hill, April 2002), and a book for consumers, “The Skin Type Solution” (Bantam, 2006). She has contributed to the Cosmeceutical Critique column in Skin & Allergy News since January 2001. Her latest book, “Cosmeceuticals and Cosmetic Ingredients,” will be published in November 2014. Dr. Baumann has received funding for clinical grants from Allergan, Aveeno, Avon Products, Evolus, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Kythera, Mary Kay, Medicis Pharmaceuticals, Neutrogena, Philosophy,Topix Pharmaceuticals, and Unilever.
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
Master Class: Office evaluation for incontinence
Ten years ago, urodynamics were widely viewed as the gold standard for evaluating urinary incontinence. We often turned to such testing to confirm or reject the findings of our basic evaluation before determining the best type of treatment – especially before proceeding with primary anti-incontinence surgery.
What has emerged in recent years is a body of evidence that tells us otherwise. We now know that urodynamics do not give us all the answers, and that we can be much more judicious with its use.

A good history followed by a thorough physical examination and some office tests often enables us to make sound treatment recommendations without costly and potentially uncomfortable urodynamic testing. The key lies in discerning complicated and uncomplicated cases. For patients deemed to have uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) – especially those who have failed conservative management – we can comfortably recommend surgical repair without urodynamic testing.
Identifying uncomplicated SUI
The history is the most important part of the evaluation for incontinence. Every patient who answers “yes” to a basic opening question about whether she has any concerns about bladder control should be asked a series of questions that will enable the physician to fully understand her symptoms, their severity, and their impact on her life and daily activities.
It is critical to determine whether you are dealing with pure SUI, pure urge incontinence (UI), or SUI with a component of UI. Mixed incontinence is quite prevalent. An analysis of recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data showed that of those women reporting incontinence symptoms, almost 50% reported pure SUI, and 34% reported mixed incontinence (J. Urol. 2008;179: 656-61). Other studies similarly have shown prevalence rates of mixed incontinence above 30%.
The International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) recommends the use of validated questionnaires to assess incontinence and the relative contribution of UI and SUI symptoms. Some physicians do find the organized and structured format of questionnaires helpful in their practices. Others have incorporated questions from various tools into history-taking templates on their electronic medical records. Still others have made them part of a mental checklist for history taking.
The short-form version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), for instance, asks the patient whether she experiences – and how much she is bothered by – the following: frequent urination; leakage related to a feeling of urgency; leakage related to activity, coughing, or sneezing; small amount of leakage; difficulty emptying the bladder; and pain or discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area.
The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire can be used to further assess the impact of symptoms. The short-form IIQ (the IIQ-7) asks, for instance, about the extent to which urine leakage has affected household chores, physical recreation, social activities, or emotional health.
Since the UDI and IIQ were developed about 20 years ago, at least several other urinary incontinence questionnaires have been developed and validated. Whether or not questionnaires are utilized as official tools, history taking should capture their essence and provide you with enough information to ascertain the type of incontinence, frequency of occurrence, severity, and effect on daily life.
The history also must assess the possibility of voiding dysfunction. Positive responses to questions about nocturia, hesitancy, and the need to immediately revoid, for instance, point toward complicated SUI and the need for further assessment before embarking on surgical treatment for SUI.
Patients who have uncomplicated SUI, on the other hand, will answer negatively to questions about symptoms of predominant urgency, functional impairment, continuous leakage, and/or incomplete emptying. They also will not have had recurrent urinary tract infections or medical conditions that can affect lower urinary tract function (such as neurologic disease and poorly controlled diabetes).
The physical exam
Along with the history, the physical exam is important for identifying complicated SUI and confirming which cases of SUI are truly uncomplicated. Evaluation should include a cough stress test to confirm leakage from the urethra under stress, an assessment of urethral mobility, and an assessment for pelvic organ prolapse.
The cough stress test is usually done with the patient in the supine or semirecumbent lithotomy position. If you strongly suspect stress incontinence but have a negative result, consider the following:
• Make sure the patient has a comfortably full bladder.
• Many women will contract their pelvic floor muscles when coughing to try to avoid leaking. You can apply pressure against the posterior vaginal wall either digitally or with half of the bivalve speculum to keep the patient from activating her muscles.
• The cough test can be performed in the standing position.
Assessing urethral mobility similarly involves simple observation while the patient is in a supine lithotomy position and straining. A Q-tip test or the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system may be used, but visualization and palpation also are completely acceptable.
Just as the absence of urethral mobility is a red flag, so is prolapse beyond the hymen. This patient could potentially have urethral kinking, which can mask the severity of SUI or be a source of retention. Either finding the absence of urethral mobility or the presence of POP beyond the hymen moves the case from the uncomplicated to complicated category and signals the need for further evaluation with urodynamics or other tests.
These and other findings for uncomplicated versus complicated SUI are outlined in a committee opinion issued recently by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (Committee Opinion No. 603, Obstet .Gynecol. 2014;123:1403-7).
As the ACOG-AUGS recommendations point out, urinalysis is part of the minimum work-up for stress incontinence. Measurement of postvoid residual urine volume also becomes important when midurethral sling surgery is being contemplated for uncomplicated SUI. A normal volume rules out potential bladder-emptying abnormalities and provides final assurance that the patient is a good candidate for surgical repair.
Recent research on urodynamics
Evidence that a simple office-based incontinence evaluation without preoperative urodynamic testing is appropriate for uncomplicated predominant SUI comes largely from two recent randomized noninferiority trials.
One of these trials – a study from the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network in the United States, known as the VALUE trial – randomized 630 women with uncomplicated SUI to pretreatment work-up with or without urodynamics. Treatment success at 12 months was similar for the two groups (approximately 77%).
This finding, the authors wrote, suggests that for women with uncomplicated SUI, a “basic office evaluation” (i.e., a positive provocative stress test, a normal postvoiding residual volume, an assessment or urethral mobility, and a negative urinalysis) is a “sufficient preoperative work-up” (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1987-97).
The diagnosis of SUI as made by office evaluation was confirmed in 97% of women who underwent urodynamic testing, and while there were some adjustments in diagnosis after urodynamics, there were no major changes in treatment decision making after the testing. Approximately 93% of women in both groups underwent midurethral sling surgery.
The second trial, a Dutch study, focused on women who had already undergone urodynamic testing and been shown to have discordant findings on urodynamics and their history and clinical exam. The women – all of whom had uncomplicated predominant SUI – were randomized to undergo immediate midurethral sling surgery or receive individually tailored treatment (including sling surgery, behavioral and physical therapy, pessary, and anticholinergics).
At 1 year, there was no clinically significant difference between the two groups in patients’ assessment of their symptoms as measured by the UDI. The authors concluded that “an immediate midurethral sling operation is not inferior to individually tailored treatment based on urodynamic findings” and that “urodynamics should no longer be advised routinely before primary surgery in these patients” (Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;121:999-1008).
When urge incontinence is involved
Urodynamic testing was never believed to be perfect, but these and other studies have highlighted its imperfections. Urodynamics creates an artificial condition in the bladder, in effect, and some of the findings will involve artifact. A systematic review of studies that compared diagnoses based on symptoms with diagnoses after urodynamic investigation was interesting in this regard; while the review did not assess impact on treatment, it showed that there is poor agreement between clinical symptoms and urodynamic-based diagnoses (Neurourol. Urodyn. 2011;30:495-502).
Certainly, women with complicated SUI – as well as women who have recurrent SUI after a prior surgical intervention – require further assessment, which likely includes multichannel urodynamic testing.
Urodynamics also can play a useful role in decision making and counseling for some patients whose incontinence is predominately SUI, but is believed to involve some degree of urinary urgency. Patients with mixed urinary incontinence fare worse after midurethral sling procedures compared with patients who have SUI alone, and I counsel my patients accordingly, emphasizing that the sling will not address aspects of their incontinence related to urgency. When I sense that a patient may have unreasonably high expectations for surgery, urodynamic testing can provide some perspective on possible postoperative outcomes.
Treatment for UI or overactive bladder often may be initiated after simple office-based evaluation, just as with SUI. The goal, similarly, is to discern relatively uncomplicated or straightforward cases from complicated ones. Urologic, medical, and neurologic histories should be obtained, for instance, and retention issues (which can aggravate UI) should be ruled out through the measurement of postvoid residual urine volume.
Just as with SUI, evaluation of suspected UI more often than not involves careful history taking and clinical probing. A voiding diary can sometimes be helpful; I send patients home with such a tool when the history is inconclusive or I suspect behavioral (excessive fluid intake) or functional issues as significant factors in bladder control.
It is important to keep in mind that patients with severe SUI may have urinary frequency as a learned response. Such patients appear to have overactive bladder in addition to SUI, but may actually be urinating frequently because they’ve learned that doing so results in less leakage. In our practice we’ve observed that patients with a learned response tend not to have nocturia, while those with overactive bladder do report nocturia.
Dr. Culbertson had no relevant financial disclosures.
Dr. Culbertson is a professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago.
Ten years ago, urodynamics were widely viewed as the gold standard for evaluating urinary incontinence. We often turned to such testing to confirm or reject the findings of our basic evaluation before determining the best type of treatment – especially before proceeding with primary anti-incontinence surgery.
What has emerged in recent years is a body of evidence that tells us otherwise. We now know that urodynamics do not give us all the answers, and that we can be much more judicious with its use.

A good history followed by a thorough physical examination and some office tests often enables us to make sound treatment recommendations without costly and potentially uncomfortable urodynamic testing. The key lies in discerning complicated and uncomplicated cases. For patients deemed to have uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) – especially those who have failed conservative management – we can comfortably recommend surgical repair without urodynamic testing.
Identifying uncomplicated SUI
The history is the most important part of the evaluation for incontinence. Every patient who answers “yes” to a basic opening question about whether she has any concerns about bladder control should be asked a series of questions that will enable the physician to fully understand her symptoms, their severity, and their impact on her life and daily activities.
It is critical to determine whether you are dealing with pure SUI, pure urge incontinence (UI), or SUI with a component of UI. Mixed incontinence is quite prevalent. An analysis of recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data showed that of those women reporting incontinence symptoms, almost 50% reported pure SUI, and 34% reported mixed incontinence (J. Urol. 2008;179: 656-61). Other studies similarly have shown prevalence rates of mixed incontinence above 30%.
The International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) recommends the use of validated questionnaires to assess incontinence and the relative contribution of UI and SUI symptoms. Some physicians do find the organized and structured format of questionnaires helpful in their practices. Others have incorporated questions from various tools into history-taking templates on their electronic medical records. Still others have made them part of a mental checklist for history taking.
The short-form version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), for instance, asks the patient whether she experiences – and how much she is bothered by – the following: frequent urination; leakage related to a feeling of urgency; leakage related to activity, coughing, or sneezing; small amount of leakage; difficulty emptying the bladder; and pain or discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area.
The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire can be used to further assess the impact of symptoms. The short-form IIQ (the IIQ-7) asks, for instance, about the extent to which urine leakage has affected household chores, physical recreation, social activities, or emotional health.
Since the UDI and IIQ were developed about 20 years ago, at least several other urinary incontinence questionnaires have been developed and validated. Whether or not questionnaires are utilized as official tools, history taking should capture their essence and provide you with enough information to ascertain the type of incontinence, frequency of occurrence, severity, and effect on daily life.
The history also must assess the possibility of voiding dysfunction. Positive responses to questions about nocturia, hesitancy, and the need to immediately revoid, for instance, point toward complicated SUI and the need for further assessment before embarking on surgical treatment for SUI.
Patients who have uncomplicated SUI, on the other hand, will answer negatively to questions about symptoms of predominant urgency, functional impairment, continuous leakage, and/or incomplete emptying. They also will not have had recurrent urinary tract infections or medical conditions that can affect lower urinary tract function (such as neurologic disease and poorly controlled diabetes).
The physical exam
Along with the history, the physical exam is important for identifying complicated SUI and confirming which cases of SUI are truly uncomplicated. Evaluation should include a cough stress test to confirm leakage from the urethra under stress, an assessment of urethral mobility, and an assessment for pelvic organ prolapse.
The cough stress test is usually done with the patient in the supine or semirecumbent lithotomy position. If you strongly suspect stress incontinence but have a negative result, consider the following:
• Make sure the patient has a comfortably full bladder.
• Many women will contract their pelvic floor muscles when coughing to try to avoid leaking. You can apply pressure against the posterior vaginal wall either digitally or with half of the bivalve speculum to keep the patient from activating her muscles.
• The cough test can be performed in the standing position.
Assessing urethral mobility similarly involves simple observation while the patient is in a supine lithotomy position and straining. A Q-tip test or the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system may be used, but visualization and palpation also are completely acceptable.
Just as the absence of urethral mobility is a red flag, so is prolapse beyond the hymen. This patient could potentially have urethral kinking, which can mask the severity of SUI or be a source of retention. Either finding the absence of urethral mobility or the presence of POP beyond the hymen moves the case from the uncomplicated to complicated category and signals the need for further evaluation with urodynamics or other tests.
These and other findings for uncomplicated versus complicated SUI are outlined in a committee opinion issued recently by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (Committee Opinion No. 603, Obstet .Gynecol. 2014;123:1403-7).
As the ACOG-AUGS recommendations point out, urinalysis is part of the minimum work-up for stress incontinence. Measurement of postvoid residual urine volume also becomes important when midurethral sling surgery is being contemplated for uncomplicated SUI. A normal volume rules out potential bladder-emptying abnormalities and provides final assurance that the patient is a good candidate for surgical repair.
Recent research on urodynamics
Evidence that a simple office-based incontinence evaluation without preoperative urodynamic testing is appropriate for uncomplicated predominant SUI comes largely from two recent randomized noninferiority trials.
One of these trials – a study from the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network in the United States, known as the VALUE trial – randomized 630 women with uncomplicated SUI to pretreatment work-up with or without urodynamics. Treatment success at 12 months was similar for the two groups (approximately 77%).
This finding, the authors wrote, suggests that for women with uncomplicated SUI, a “basic office evaluation” (i.e., a positive provocative stress test, a normal postvoiding residual volume, an assessment or urethral mobility, and a negative urinalysis) is a “sufficient preoperative work-up” (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1987-97).
The diagnosis of SUI as made by office evaluation was confirmed in 97% of women who underwent urodynamic testing, and while there were some adjustments in diagnosis after urodynamics, there were no major changes in treatment decision making after the testing. Approximately 93% of women in both groups underwent midurethral sling surgery.
The second trial, a Dutch study, focused on women who had already undergone urodynamic testing and been shown to have discordant findings on urodynamics and their history and clinical exam. The women – all of whom had uncomplicated predominant SUI – were randomized to undergo immediate midurethral sling surgery or receive individually tailored treatment (including sling surgery, behavioral and physical therapy, pessary, and anticholinergics).
At 1 year, there was no clinically significant difference between the two groups in patients’ assessment of their symptoms as measured by the UDI. The authors concluded that “an immediate midurethral sling operation is not inferior to individually tailored treatment based on urodynamic findings” and that “urodynamics should no longer be advised routinely before primary surgery in these patients” (Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;121:999-1008).
When urge incontinence is involved
Urodynamic testing was never believed to be perfect, but these and other studies have highlighted its imperfections. Urodynamics creates an artificial condition in the bladder, in effect, and some of the findings will involve artifact. A systematic review of studies that compared diagnoses based on symptoms with diagnoses after urodynamic investigation was interesting in this regard; while the review did not assess impact on treatment, it showed that there is poor agreement between clinical symptoms and urodynamic-based diagnoses (Neurourol. Urodyn. 2011;30:495-502).
Certainly, women with complicated SUI – as well as women who have recurrent SUI after a prior surgical intervention – require further assessment, which likely includes multichannel urodynamic testing.
Urodynamics also can play a useful role in decision making and counseling for some patients whose incontinence is predominately SUI, but is believed to involve some degree of urinary urgency. Patients with mixed urinary incontinence fare worse after midurethral sling procedures compared with patients who have SUI alone, and I counsel my patients accordingly, emphasizing that the sling will not address aspects of their incontinence related to urgency. When I sense that a patient may have unreasonably high expectations for surgery, urodynamic testing can provide some perspective on possible postoperative outcomes.
Treatment for UI or overactive bladder often may be initiated after simple office-based evaluation, just as with SUI. The goal, similarly, is to discern relatively uncomplicated or straightforward cases from complicated ones. Urologic, medical, and neurologic histories should be obtained, for instance, and retention issues (which can aggravate UI) should be ruled out through the measurement of postvoid residual urine volume.
Just as with SUI, evaluation of suspected UI more often than not involves careful history taking and clinical probing. A voiding diary can sometimes be helpful; I send patients home with such a tool when the history is inconclusive or I suspect behavioral (excessive fluid intake) or functional issues as significant factors in bladder control.
It is important to keep in mind that patients with severe SUI may have urinary frequency as a learned response. Such patients appear to have overactive bladder in addition to SUI, but may actually be urinating frequently because they’ve learned that doing so results in less leakage. In our practice we’ve observed that patients with a learned response tend not to have nocturia, while those with overactive bladder do report nocturia.
Dr. Culbertson had no relevant financial disclosures.
Dr. Culbertson is a professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago.
Ten years ago, urodynamics were widely viewed as the gold standard for evaluating urinary incontinence. We often turned to such testing to confirm or reject the findings of our basic evaluation before determining the best type of treatment – especially before proceeding with primary anti-incontinence surgery.
What has emerged in recent years is a body of evidence that tells us otherwise. We now know that urodynamics do not give us all the answers, and that we can be much more judicious with its use.

A good history followed by a thorough physical examination and some office tests often enables us to make sound treatment recommendations without costly and potentially uncomfortable urodynamic testing. The key lies in discerning complicated and uncomplicated cases. For patients deemed to have uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence (SUI) – especially those who have failed conservative management – we can comfortably recommend surgical repair without urodynamic testing.
Identifying uncomplicated SUI
The history is the most important part of the evaluation for incontinence. Every patient who answers “yes” to a basic opening question about whether she has any concerns about bladder control should be asked a series of questions that will enable the physician to fully understand her symptoms, their severity, and their impact on her life and daily activities.
It is critical to determine whether you are dealing with pure SUI, pure urge incontinence (UI), or SUI with a component of UI. Mixed incontinence is quite prevalent. An analysis of recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data showed that of those women reporting incontinence symptoms, almost 50% reported pure SUI, and 34% reported mixed incontinence (J. Urol. 2008;179: 656-61). Other studies similarly have shown prevalence rates of mixed incontinence above 30%.
The International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) recommends the use of validated questionnaires to assess incontinence and the relative contribution of UI and SUI symptoms. Some physicians do find the organized and structured format of questionnaires helpful in their practices. Others have incorporated questions from various tools into history-taking templates on their electronic medical records. Still others have made them part of a mental checklist for history taking.
The short-form version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), for instance, asks the patient whether she experiences – and how much she is bothered by – the following: frequent urination; leakage related to a feeling of urgency; leakage related to activity, coughing, or sneezing; small amount of leakage; difficulty emptying the bladder; and pain or discomfort in the lower abdominal or genital area.
The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire can be used to further assess the impact of symptoms. The short-form IIQ (the IIQ-7) asks, for instance, about the extent to which urine leakage has affected household chores, physical recreation, social activities, or emotional health.
Since the UDI and IIQ were developed about 20 years ago, at least several other urinary incontinence questionnaires have been developed and validated. Whether or not questionnaires are utilized as official tools, history taking should capture their essence and provide you with enough information to ascertain the type of incontinence, frequency of occurrence, severity, and effect on daily life.
The history also must assess the possibility of voiding dysfunction. Positive responses to questions about nocturia, hesitancy, and the need to immediately revoid, for instance, point toward complicated SUI and the need for further assessment before embarking on surgical treatment for SUI.
Patients who have uncomplicated SUI, on the other hand, will answer negatively to questions about symptoms of predominant urgency, functional impairment, continuous leakage, and/or incomplete emptying. They also will not have had recurrent urinary tract infections or medical conditions that can affect lower urinary tract function (such as neurologic disease and poorly controlled diabetes).
The physical exam
Along with the history, the physical exam is important for identifying complicated SUI and confirming which cases of SUI are truly uncomplicated. Evaluation should include a cough stress test to confirm leakage from the urethra under stress, an assessment of urethral mobility, and an assessment for pelvic organ prolapse.
The cough stress test is usually done with the patient in the supine or semirecumbent lithotomy position. If you strongly suspect stress incontinence but have a negative result, consider the following:
• Make sure the patient has a comfortably full bladder.
• Many women will contract their pelvic floor muscles when coughing to try to avoid leaking. You can apply pressure against the posterior vaginal wall either digitally or with half of the bivalve speculum to keep the patient from activating her muscles.
• The cough test can be performed in the standing position.
Assessing urethral mobility similarly involves simple observation while the patient is in a supine lithotomy position and straining. A Q-tip test or the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system may be used, but visualization and palpation also are completely acceptable.
Just as the absence of urethral mobility is a red flag, so is prolapse beyond the hymen. This patient could potentially have urethral kinking, which can mask the severity of SUI or be a source of retention. Either finding the absence of urethral mobility or the presence of POP beyond the hymen moves the case from the uncomplicated to complicated category and signals the need for further evaluation with urodynamics or other tests.
These and other findings for uncomplicated versus complicated SUI are outlined in a committee opinion issued recently by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society (Committee Opinion No. 603, Obstet .Gynecol. 2014;123:1403-7).
As the ACOG-AUGS recommendations point out, urinalysis is part of the minimum work-up for stress incontinence. Measurement of postvoid residual urine volume also becomes important when midurethral sling surgery is being contemplated for uncomplicated SUI. A normal volume rules out potential bladder-emptying abnormalities and provides final assurance that the patient is a good candidate for surgical repair.
Recent research on urodynamics
Evidence that a simple office-based incontinence evaluation without preoperative urodynamic testing is appropriate for uncomplicated predominant SUI comes largely from two recent randomized noninferiority trials.
One of these trials – a study from the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network in the United States, known as the VALUE trial – randomized 630 women with uncomplicated SUI to pretreatment work-up with or without urodynamics. Treatment success at 12 months was similar for the two groups (approximately 77%).
This finding, the authors wrote, suggests that for women with uncomplicated SUI, a “basic office evaluation” (i.e., a positive provocative stress test, a normal postvoiding residual volume, an assessment or urethral mobility, and a negative urinalysis) is a “sufficient preoperative work-up” (N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1987-97).
The diagnosis of SUI as made by office evaluation was confirmed in 97% of women who underwent urodynamic testing, and while there were some adjustments in diagnosis after urodynamics, there were no major changes in treatment decision making after the testing. Approximately 93% of women in both groups underwent midurethral sling surgery.
The second trial, a Dutch study, focused on women who had already undergone urodynamic testing and been shown to have discordant findings on urodynamics and their history and clinical exam. The women – all of whom had uncomplicated predominant SUI – were randomized to undergo immediate midurethral sling surgery or receive individually tailored treatment (including sling surgery, behavioral and physical therapy, pessary, and anticholinergics).
At 1 year, there was no clinically significant difference between the two groups in patients’ assessment of their symptoms as measured by the UDI. The authors concluded that “an immediate midurethral sling operation is not inferior to individually tailored treatment based on urodynamic findings” and that “urodynamics should no longer be advised routinely before primary surgery in these patients” (Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;121:999-1008).
When urge incontinence is involved
Urodynamic testing was never believed to be perfect, but these and other studies have highlighted its imperfections. Urodynamics creates an artificial condition in the bladder, in effect, and some of the findings will involve artifact. A systematic review of studies that compared diagnoses based on symptoms with diagnoses after urodynamic investigation was interesting in this regard; while the review did not assess impact on treatment, it showed that there is poor agreement between clinical symptoms and urodynamic-based diagnoses (Neurourol. Urodyn. 2011;30:495-502).
Certainly, women with complicated SUI – as well as women who have recurrent SUI after a prior surgical intervention – require further assessment, which likely includes multichannel urodynamic testing.
Urodynamics also can play a useful role in decision making and counseling for some patients whose incontinence is predominately SUI, but is believed to involve some degree of urinary urgency. Patients with mixed urinary incontinence fare worse after midurethral sling procedures compared with patients who have SUI alone, and I counsel my patients accordingly, emphasizing that the sling will not address aspects of their incontinence related to urgency. When I sense that a patient may have unreasonably high expectations for surgery, urodynamic testing can provide some perspective on possible postoperative outcomes.
Treatment for UI or overactive bladder often may be initiated after simple office-based evaluation, just as with SUI. The goal, similarly, is to discern relatively uncomplicated or straightforward cases from complicated ones. Urologic, medical, and neurologic histories should be obtained, for instance, and retention issues (which can aggravate UI) should be ruled out through the measurement of postvoid residual urine volume.
Just as with SUI, evaluation of suspected UI more often than not involves careful history taking and clinical probing. A voiding diary can sometimes be helpful; I send patients home with such a tool when the history is inconclusive or I suspect behavioral (excessive fluid intake) or functional issues as significant factors in bladder control.
It is important to keep in mind that patients with severe SUI may have urinary frequency as a learned response. Such patients appear to have overactive bladder in addition to SUI, but may actually be urinating frequently because they’ve learned that doing so results in less leakage. In our practice we’ve observed that patients with a learned response tend not to have nocturia, while those with overactive bladder do report nocturia.
Dr. Culbertson had no relevant financial disclosures.
Dr. Culbertson is a professor in the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Chicago.
Gemcitabine: Best Alone or in Combination?
Gemcitabine (GEM) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (LA/MPC). Many studies have focused on finding combinations that might extend the efficacy of GEM. However, most studies have not found an improvement in overall survival (OS) for patients using GEM combination therapy, say researchers from Beijing Friendship Hospital in China. That is until recently, when researchers found that compared with GEM monotherapy, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus GEM significantly improved OS (8.5 months vs 6.7 months; P < .001) and progression-free survival (5.5 months vs 3.7 months; P < .001).
Other research has found that combining GEM with platinum, fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, biotherapy, and others, for example, marginally but significantly affects OS, again compared with GEM monotherapy (P = .001). The combinations were associated with increased toxicity.
According to the researchers, the use of targeted therapies in cancer treatment is a “significant focus” of cancer research and has brought great clinical benefits in treating a variety of solid tumors. Studies that combined drugs to target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is overexpressed in pancreatic tumors and associated with poor prognosis, had mixed results for patients with LA/MPC. This prompted researchers in this study to conduct a systematic survey of 10 randomized controlled trials: 3 phase 2 trials and 7 phase 3 trials. Of 3,899 patients, 1,989 received GEM + targeted agents and 1,910 received GEM as monotherapy or combined with placebo (PLC). In a subgroup of GEM + antiangiogenic agents, 733 patients received GEM + axitinib or bevacizumab and cilengitide, and 693 received GEM ± PLC.
No significant difference was seen in the OS rate between the GEM + targeted agents and GEM ± PLC groups (P = .85), and only a marginal difference was found in the 1-year survival rate (P = .05). In the subgroup analysis, the researchers found a significant increase in objective response rate with GEM + antiangiogenic agents vs GEM ± PLC (95% CI, 0.42-0.98; P = .04). However, they found no significant difference in OS, 1-year survival, or progression-free survival between those 2 groups.
The researchers advise further research concentrated on clarifying the “concrete targets” involved in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic cancer. They add that personalized therapy based on a patient’s stratification, tumor stage, and genetic background should also be considered.
Source
Li Q, Yuan Z, Yan H, Wen Z, Zhang R, Cao B. Clin Ther. 2014;36(7):1054-1063.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.05.066.
Gemcitabine (GEM) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (LA/MPC). Many studies have focused on finding combinations that might extend the efficacy of GEM. However, most studies have not found an improvement in overall survival (OS) for patients using GEM combination therapy, say researchers from Beijing Friendship Hospital in China. That is until recently, when researchers found that compared with GEM monotherapy, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus GEM significantly improved OS (8.5 months vs 6.7 months; P < .001) and progression-free survival (5.5 months vs 3.7 months; P < .001).
Other research has found that combining GEM with platinum, fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, biotherapy, and others, for example, marginally but significantly affects OS, again compared with GEM monotherapy (P = .001). The combinations were associated with increased toxicity.
According to the researchers, the use of targeted therapies in cancer treatment is a “significant focus” of cancer research and has brought great clinical benefits in treating a variety of solid tumors. Studies that combined drugs to target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is overexpressed in pancreatic tumors and associated with poor prognosis, had mixed results for patients with LA/MPC. This prompted researchers in this study to conduct a systematic survey of 10 randomized controlled trials: 3 phase 2 trials and 7 phase 3 trials. Of 3,899 patients, 1,989 received GEM + targeted agents and 1,910 received GEM as monotherapy or combined with placebo (PLC). In a subgroup of GEM + antiangiogenic agents, 733 patients received GEM + axitinib or bevacizumab and cilengitide, and 693 received GEM ± PLC.
No significant difference was seen in the OS rate between the GEM + targeted agents and GEM ± PLC groups (P = .85), and only a marginal difference was found in the 1-year survival rate (P = .05). In the subgroup analysis, the researchers found a significant increase in objective response rate with GEM + antiangiogenic agents vs GEM ± PLC (95% CI, 0.42-0.98; P = .04). However, they found no significant difference in OS, 1-year survival, or progression-free survival between those 2 groups.
The researchers advise further research concentrated on clarifying the “concrete targets” involved in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic cancer. They add that personalized therapy based on a patient’s stratification, tumor stage, and genetic background should also be considered.
Source
Li Q, Yuan Z, Yan H, Wen Z, Zhang R, Cao B. Clin Ther. 2014;36(7):1054-1063.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.05.066.
Gemcitabine (GEM) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer (LA/MPC). Many studies have focused on finding combinations that might extend the efficacy of GEM. However, most studies have not found an improvement in overall survival (OS) for patients using GEM combination therapy, say researchers from Beijing Friendship Hospital in China. That is until recently, when researchers found that compared with GEM monotherapy, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus GEM significantly improved OS (8.5 months vs 6.7 months; P < .001) and progression-free survival (5.5 months vs 3.7 months; P < .001).
Other research has found that combining GEM with platinum, fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, biotherapy, and others, for example, marginally but significantly affects OS, again compared with GEM monotherapy (P = .001). The combinations were associated with increased toxicity.
According to the researchers, the use of targeted therapies in cancer treatment is a “significant focus” of cancer research and has brought great clinical benefits in treating a variety of solid tumors. Studies that combined drugs to target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which is overexpressed in pancreatic tumors and associated with poor prognosis, had mixed results for patients with LA/MPC. This prompted researchers in this study to conduct a systematic survey of 10 randomized controlled trials: 3 phase 2 trials and 7 phase 3 trials. Of 3,899 patients, 1,989 received GEM + targeted agents and 1,910 received GEM as monotherapy or combined with placebo (PLC). In a subgroup of GEM + antiangiogenic agents, 733 patients received GEM + axitinib or bevacizumab and cilengitide, and 693 received GEM ± PLC.
No significant difference was seen in the OS rate between the GEM + targeted agents and GEM ± PLC groups (P = .85), and only a marginal difference was found in the 1-year survival rate (P = .05). In the subgroup analysis, the researchers found a significant increase in objective response rate with GEM + antiangiogenic agents vs GEM ± PLC (95% CI, 0.42-0.98; P = .04). However, they found no significant difference in OS, 1-year survival, or progression-free survival between those 2 groups.
The researchers advise further research concentrated on clarifying the “concrete targets” involved in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic cancer. They add that personalized therapy based on a patient’s stratification, tumor stage, and genetic background should also be considered.
Source
Li Q, Yuan Z, Yan H, Wen Z, Zhang R, Cao B. Clin Ther. 2014;36(7):1054-1063.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.05.066.