An estimated 98,000 Americans die each year due to medical errors. This is an attention-grabbing statistic—from the year 2000.¹ A recent study (published in 2016) reported that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States, ranking just behind heart disease and cancer.²

As expected, much has been done to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety as a result of these publications. Quality, safety, and outcomes are paramount, as evidenced by the Institute of Health Care Improvement’s “triple aim”: reduce cost of care, improve quality of care, and improve patient outcomes.³

While these 3 aims are of paramount importance, this article seeks to portray the “quadruple aim,” with an additional focus on physician well-being. Patients and their families (first victims) are not the only ones affected by medical errors. Clinicians are, too, and these effects can be devastating. Here I offer concrete strategies to support providers involved in medical errors, including tips on developing a formal support program. First, however, I describe the devastating effects medical errors can have on providers and the signs of a second victim.

Related article:
Medical errors: Caring for the second victim (you)

The scope of the problem

In 2000, it was Dr. Albert Wu’s publication in The British Medical Journal titled “Medical Error: The Second Victim” (the doctor who makes mistakes needs help too), that first addressed this important topic.⁴ In his article he shared a case of another house officer who missed signs of a pericardial tamponade and was judged incompetent by peers due to his mistake.

As physicians, we do not intrinsically support colleagues who have experienced a medical error. We all have taken, with pride and commitment, our Hippocratic Oath of “do no harm,” yet we are often held to standards of perfection by society, peers, and, above all, ourselves. Have technologic wonders and precise laboratory tests supplanted the adage “doctors are only human”? Dr. Wu also points out in this landmark essay his observation and dismay at the lack of empathy, sympathy, and compassion shown by peers when medical errors occur. All of these elements are needed for the healing of those involved to take place. If they are not provided, dysfunctional coping mechanisms ensue.⁴

Incidence of medical errors

Despite the Institute of Medicine report from 2000¹ and the recent study from Johns Hopkins,² determining the exact number of errors and incidents is not easy. Most data reporting is sparse. A prospective longitudinal study of perceived medical errors and resident distress estimated medical errors to be between 5% and 10% in hospitalized patients, but that it could be up to 50%.⁵ According to a 2005 study, approximately one-third of internal medicine residents report at least 1 major medical error during their 3 years of training, while 18% of multidisciplinary residents report an adverse event under their care in the previous week.⁶

Related article:
Medical errors: Meeting ethical obligations and reducing liability with proper communication

Who is at risk of becoming a second victim?

Any and all clinicians can become a second victim, and the state can be realized at varying points in the process of an experienced medical error. The circumstances of the initial error and the severity of the effect on the patient and/or the damaged physician−patient relationship can affect whether or not there is a second victim. A second victim also can emerge as a result of peers’ or colleagues’ comments and lack of empathy or support. Certainly a lawsuit can produce a second victim.⁷

How often do physicians become second victims?

The prevalence of second victims has a large variation in estimates. A 2006 study estimates a prevalence of 10.4%.⁸ In 2010, the estimate was 30%, and a prevalence of 43.3% was reported in 2000.^9,10 Regarding emotional distress within a year of a major adverse event, 30% of almost 900 providers reported these feelings.¹¹ Other studies note 50% of health care workers reported feelings consistent with those of a second victim.⁷

Next: What are the symptoms of a second victim?

The signs of, and long-lasting risks for, a second victim

Second victims are at risk for several well-documented symptoms, regardless of their stage of training, including⁶:

• depression (in fact, they have a 3-fold risk)
• decrease in overall quality of life
• increase in burnout
• increase in feelings of distress, guilt, and shame, which may be long lasting.

Health care providers as second victims also may experience shock and hopelessness, sleep disturbance, social avoidance, intrusive thoughts and nightmares, and poor memory and concentration. Interestingly, these emotions and reactions are indistinguishable from posttraumatic stress disorder. These continued symptoms can have short- and long-term implications for physicians, patients, and the health care organization.¹²

Next: How to support those affected by a medical error

How to support all of those affected by a medical error

Over the past decade or so, much attention has been paid to creating safer health systems, improving outcomes and patient satisfaction, and recognizing the needs of patients and families of first victims when medical errors occur. Much less has been done to acknowledge and address the needs of struggling clinicians.

Provide nurturing discussions and sympathy

Hospital systems do have embedded processes to review outcomes and medical errors, including, among others, peer review, quality improvement, morbidity and mortality review, and root cause analysis. Unfortunately, often a “name, blame, shame game” can result from the overall process, with certain individuals or groups of individuals singled out, and only worsen the incidence and effects of the second victim. Ideally, system processes for addressing medical errors should allow for an environment more focused on nurturing discussions to prevent error and recognize all the factors contributing to an error.

Of course in any outcome or error investigation, the goal is to identify what happened, what factors contributed to the incident, and what can be done to prevent future occurrences. The concern for the family as priority is understandable, as is the desire to prevent a lawsuit. The lack of attention and sympathy to the health care provider involved contributes to the second victim.⁷

It is all too easy to blame, even in a Just Culture. Deficiencies in sympathy and attention can occur without a system whose culture is focused on “name, blame, shame.” A Just Culture, as defined by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, is one in which individuals come forward with a mistake without fear of punishment. Such a culture balances the need to learn from our mistakes and the need to have disciplinary action.¹³

David Marx, an outcomes engineer and author of “Whack a Mole: The Price We Pay for Expecting Perfection,” touts a Just Culture as one having the following sets of beliefs:

• recognition that professionals will make mistakes
• recognition that even professionals will develop unhealthy norms
• a fierce intolerance for reckless conduct.

He strongly asserts that human error be consoled while reckless behavior be punished.¹⁴ Punishing human error is a setup for the second victim.

Read on for tips to develop a coping program

Tips for developing a coping program

In 2009, Scott and colleagues described 6 stages of a second victim. These are:

• Stage 1: Chaos and event repair
• Stage 2: Intrusive thoughts, “what if”
• Stage 3: Restoring personal identity
• Stage 4: Enduring the inquisition
• Stage 5: Obtaining emotional first aid
• Stage 6: Moving on or dropping out; surviving and/or thriving

Throughout the stages, second victims look for support and share their experience of the medical error event, as well as their personal and professional impact of the error.¹⁵

A 2007 study that examined the emotional impact of medical errors on physicians revealed some startling data. A full 82% of physicians expressed interest in counseling to help cope with their distress. And 90% felt there was inadequate support at their hospitals or health care organizations for this distress.¹⁶

Use The Joint Commission’s toolkit

Unfortunately, there are only a few well-documented second-victim support programs in the United States, despite the growing evidence of the emotional distress that second victims experience. Many hospitals do not know how to develop or implement such a support system. Recognizing this challenge, The Joint Commission developed a toolkit to assist health care organizations in developing a second-victim program. The toolkit consists of 10 modules (TABLE) designed to assist organizations not only to implement a second-victim support process but also to customize it to their specific institutional culture. This toolkit can be downloaded for free or used online. Within the first year of its availability, over 6,000 people visited the website and there were more than 700 requests for a download.¹⁷

Follow forYOU’s example

An example and well-recognized second-victim support program is the “forYOU” team at the University of Missouri. The program is free to employees, confidential, and available 24-7. Its purpose is “providing care and support to our staff,” by helping members understand the phenomenon of the second victim and quickly returning members to a satisfying professional practice.¹⁸

The “forYOU” team was created in 2007 under the direction of the University of Missouri Health Care’s Office of Clinical Effectiveness with the goals of increasing institutional awareness, providing a second victim with a “safe zone,” and allowing for the expression of emotions and reactions in a confidential setting. Team members are multidisciplinary and include physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, social workers, and chaplains. They strive to normalize the feelings and thoughts second victims experience after a stressful outcome or event. Team members are highly trained in second-victim responses and the stages of coping. The program has established institutional actions to each of the 6 stages (FIGURE).¹⁹

Read on to learn how peer mentors are crucial to a support program

Establish TRUST

At the Carilion Clinic in Roanoke, Virginia, we too have developed a second-victim support program for all of our employees: TRUST. In the beginning stages, we quickly reaffirmed the challenges in developing such a program.

Initial challenges you will face. First, education on what a second victim is needs to be recognized. The fact that not everyone experiences second-victim emotions needs to be validated. Administrators and staff must be convinced that needing support is not a sign of weakness. And the program must ensure confidentiality and recruit mentors. These are just a few of the obstacles we faced on our path to program realization. Our journey to develop our second-victim program was approximately 5 years and required participation, affirmation, and support from all levels of the organization.

Our program name embodies its inherent purpose and goals. TRUST stands for:

• Treatment that is just. Second victims deserve the right of a presumption that their intentions were good, and should be able to depend on organizational leaders for integrity, fairness, just treatment, and shared accountability for outcomes.
• Respect. Second victims deserve respect and common decency and should not be blamed and shamed for human fallibility.
• Understanding and compassion. Second victims need compassionate help to grieve and heal.
• Supportive care. Second victims are entitled to psychological and support services that are delivered in a professional and organized way.
• Transparency and opportunity to contribute. Second victims have a right to participate in the learning gathered from the event, to share important causal information with the organization, and to be provided with an opportunity to heal by contributing to the prevention of future events.

Employ peer mentors, who serve a vital role

We have identified the need to develop a more direct and active approach to the TRUST program’s recruitment and established a subcommittee to begin this process. We began by asking leaders to nominate potential peer mentors and spoke about the program and asked for volunteers at various hospital committees. Once we had most disciplines represented, leaders were asked to take an assessment for emotional intelligence.

Other than the initial training for the TRUST program, the time requirement for participation for peer mentors is likely less than an hour per month. The dedicated time certainly is dependent on how much support the second victim is requiring, however, and varies. We encourage the peer supporters to be aware of their time constraints and establish parameters for the relationship in a direct but supportive way.

Since the inception of the TRUST Team in September 2014, we have trained 12 peer mentors, 10 of whom currently still serve in that capacity. We have 3 additional peers awaiting training. To date, The TRUST team has supported 19 clinicians/staff, including 3 ACPs, 9 nurses, 6 physicians, and 1 other (pharmacist). Of those 10, 3 are still actively receiving support so closing data have yet to be collected. Of the 16 who have been closed, 6 were referred for ongoing support and 10 were able to return to baseline with TRUST Team Supports.

Related article:
Who is liable when a surgical error occurs?

Just surviving the medical error is not the goal

Medical errors are inevitable, and the effects on providers can be devastating. It is important that physicians and institutions are aware of the signs and symptoms of a second victim as well as provide support to them. Institutions must have a just culture in which all members of the health care team can come forward with medical errors without the fear of punishment. Ideally, these institutions also have a second-victim support system that identifies those who need assistance and assist all health care clinicians not only to survive the effects of medical errors but also to thrive after receiving the necessary support.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

An estimated 98,000 Americans die each year due to medical errors. This is an attention-grabbing statistic—from the year 2000.¹ A recent study (published in 2016) reported that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States, ranking just behind heart disease and cancer.²

As expected, much has been done to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety as a result of these publications. Quality, safety, and outcomes are paramount, as evidenced by the Institute of Health Care Improvement’s “triple aim”: reduce cost of care, improve quality of care, and improve patient outcomes.³

While these 3 aims are of paramount importance, this article seeks to portray the “quadruple aim,” with an additional focus on physician well-being. Patients and their families (first victims) are not the only ones affected by medical errors. Clinicians are, too, and these effects can be devastating. Here I offer concrete strategies to support providers involved in medical errors, including tips on developing a formal support program. First, however, I describe the devastating effects medical errors can have on providers and the signs of a second victim.

Related article:
Medical errors: Caring for the second victim (you)

The scope of the problem

In 2000, it was Dr. Albert Wu’s publication in The British Medical Journal titled “Medical Error: The Second Victim” (the doctor who makes mistakes needs help too), that first addressed this important topic.⁴ In his article he shared a case of another house officer who missed signs of a pericardial tamponade and was judged incompetent by peers due to his mistake.

As physicians, we do not intrinsically support colleagues who have experienced a medical error. We all have taken, with pride and commitment, our Hippocratic Oath of “do no harm,” yet we are often held to standards of perfection by society, peers, and, above all, ourselves. Have technologic wonders and precise laboratory tests supplanted the adage “doctors are only human”? Dr. Wu also points out in this landmark essay his observation and dismay at the lack of empathy, sympathy, and compassion shown by peers when medical errors occur. All of these elements are needed for the healing of those involved to take place. If they are not provided, dysfunctional coping mechanisms ensue.⁴

Incidence of medical errors

Despite the Institute of Medicine report from 2000¹ and the recent study from Johns Hopkins,² determining the exact number of errors and incidents is not easy. Most data reporting is sparse. A prospective longitudinal study of perceived medical errors and resident distress estimated medical errors to be between 5% and 10% in hospitalized patients, but that it could be up to 50%.⁵ According to a 2005 study, approximately one-third of internal medicine residents report at least 1 major medical error during their 3 years of training, while 18% of multidisciplinary residents report an adverse event under their care in the previous week.⁶

Related article:
Medical errors: Meeting ethical obligations and reducing liability with proper communication

Who is at risk of becoming a second victim?

Any and all clinicians can become a second victim, and the state can be realized at varying points in the process of an experienced medical error. The circumstances of the initial error and the severity of the effect on the patient and/or the damaged physician−patient relationship can affect whether or not there is a second victim. A second victim also can emerge as a result of peers’ or colleagues’ comments and lack of empathy or support. Certainly a lawsuit can produce a second victim.⁷

How often do physicians become second victims?

The prevalence of second victims has a large variation in estimates. A 2006 study estimates a prevalence of 10.4%.⁸ In 2010, the estimate was 30%, and a prevalence of 43.3% was reported in 2000.^9,10 Regarding emotional distress within a year of a major adverse event, 30% of almost 900 providers reported these feelings.¹¹ Other studies note 50% of health care workers reported feelings consistent with those of a second victim.⁷

Next: What are the symptoms of a second victim?

The signs of, and long-lasting risks for, a second victim

Second victims are at risk for several well-documented symptoms, regardless of their stage of training, including⁶:

• depression (in fact, they have a 3-fold risk)
• decrease in overall quality of life
• increase in burnout
• increase in feelings of distress, guilt, and shame, which may be long lasting.

Health care providers as second victims also may experience shock and hopelessness, sleep disturbance, social avoidance, intrusive thoughts and nightmares, and poor memory and concentration. Interestingly, these emotions and reactions are indistinguishable from posttraumatic stress disorder. These continued symptoms can have short- and long-term implications for physicians, patients, and the health care organization.¹²

Next: How to support those affected by a medical error

How to support all of those affected by a medical error

Over the past decade or so, much attention has been paid to creating safer health systems, improving outcomes and patient satisfaction, and recognizing the needs of patients and families of first victims when medical errors occur. Much less has been done to acknowledge and address the needs of struggling clinicians.

Provide nurturing discussions and sympathy

Hospital systems do have embedded processes to review outcomes and medical errors, including, among others, peer review, quality improvement, morbidity and mortality review, and root cause analysis. Unfortunately, often a “name, blame, shame game” can result from the overall process, with certain individuals or groups of individuals singled out, and only worsen the incidence and effects of the second victim. Ideally, system processes for addressing medical errors should allow for an environment more focused on nurturing discussions to prevent error and recognize all the factors contributing to an error.

Of course in any outcome or error investigation, the goal is to identify what happened, what factors contributed to the incident, and what can be done to prevent future occurrences. The concern for the family as priority is understandable, as is the desire to prevent a lawsuit. The lack of attention and sympathy to the health care provider involved contributes to the second victim.⁷

It is all too easy to blame, even in a Just Culture. Deficiencies in sympathy and attention can occur without a system whose culture is focused on “name, blame, shame.” A Just Culture, as defined by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, is one in which individuals come forward with a mistake without fear of punishment. Such a culture balances the need to learn from our mistakes and the need to have disciplinary action.¹³

David Marx, an outcomes engineer and author of “Whack a Mole: The Price We Pay for Expecting Perfection,” touts a Just Culture as one having the following sets of beliefs:

• recognition that professionals will make mistakes
• recognition that even professionals will develop unhealthy norms
• a fierce intolerance for reckless conduct.

He strongly asserts that human error be consoled while reckless behavior be punished.¹⁴ Punishing human error is a setup for the second victim.

Read on for tips to develop a coping program

Tips for developing a coping program

In 2009, Scott and colleagues described 6 stages of a second victim. These are:

• Stage 1: Chaos and event repair
• Stage 2: Intrusive thoughts, “what if”
• Stage 3: Restoring personal identity
• Stage 4: Enduring the inquisition
• Stage 5: Obtaining emotional first aid
• Stage 6: Moving on or dropping out; surviving and/or thriving

Throughout the stages, second victims look for support and share their experience of the medical error event, as well as their personal and professional impact of the error.¹⁵

A 2007 study that examined the emotional impact of medical errors on physicians revealed some startling data. A full 82% of physicians expressed interest in counseling to help cope with their distress. And 90% felt there was inadequate support at their hospitals or health care organizations for this distress.¹⁶

Use The Joint Commission’s toolkit

Unfortunately, there are only a few well-documented second-victim support programs in the United States, despite the growing evidence of the emotional distress that second victims experience. Many hospitals do not know how to develop or implement such a support system. Recognizing this challenge, The Joint Commission developed a toolkit to assist health care organizations in developing a second-victim program. The toolkit consists of 10 modules (TABLE) designed to assist organizations not only to implement a second-victim support process but also to customize it to their specific institutional culture. This toolkit can be downloaded for free or used online. Within the first year of its availability, over 6,000 people visited the website and there were more than 700 requests for a download.¹⁷

Follow forYOU’s example

An example and well-recognized second-victim support program is the “forYOU” team at the University of Missouri. The program is free to employees, confidential, and available 24-7. Its purpose is “providing care and support to our staff,” by helping members understand the phenomenon of the second victim and quickly returning members to a satisfying professional practice.¹⁸

The “forYOU” team was created in 2007 under the direction of the University of Missouri Health Care’s Office of Clinical Effectiveness with the goals of increasing institutional awareness, providing a second victim with a “safe zone,” and allowing for the expression of emotions and reactions in a confidential setting. Team members are multidisciplinary and include physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, social workers, and chaplains. They strive to normalize the feelings and thoughts second victims experience after a stressful outcome or event. Team members are highly trained in second-victim responses and the stages of coping. The program has established institutional actions to each of the 6 stages (FIGURE).¹⁹

Read on to learn how peer mentors are crucial to a support program

Establish TRUST

At the Carilion Clinic in Roanoke, Virginia, we too have developed a second-victim support program for all of our employees: TRUST. In the beginning stages, we quickly reaffirmed the challenges in developing such a program.

Initial challenges you will face. First, education on what a second victim is needs to be recognized. The fact that not everyone experiences second-victim emotions needs to be validated. Administrators and staff must be convinced that needing support is not a sign of weakness. And the program must ensure confidentiality and recruit mentors. These are just a few of the obstacles we faced on our path to program realization. Our journey to develop our second-victim program was approximately 5 years and required participation, affirmation, and support from all levels of the organization.

Our program name embodies its inherent purpose and goals. TRUST stands for:

• Treatment that is just. Second victims deserve the right of a presumption that their intentions were good, and should be able to depend on organizational leaders for integrity, fairness, just treatment, and shared accountability for outcomes.
• Respect. Second victims deserve respect and common decency and should not be blamed and shamed for human fallibility.
• Understanding and compassion. Second victims need compassionate help to grieve and heal.
• Supportive care. Second victims are entitled to psychological and support services that are delivered in a professional and organized way.
• Transparency and opportunity to contribute. Second victims have a right to participate in the learning gathered from the event, to share important causal information with the organization, and to be provided with an opportunity to heal by contributing to the prevention of future events.

Employ peer mentors, who serve a vital role

We have identified the need to develop a more direct and active approach to the TRUST program’s recruitment and established a subcommittee to begin this process. We began by asking leaders to nominate potential peer mentors and spoke about the program and asked for volunteers at various hospital committees. Once we had most disciplines represented, leaders were asked to take an assessment for emotional intelligence.

Other than the initial training for the TRUST program, the time requirement for participation for peer mentors is likely less than an hour per month. The dedicated time certainly is dependent on how much support the second victim is requiring, however, and varies. We encourage the peer supporters to be aware of their time constraints and establish parameters for the relationship in a direct but supportive way.

Since the inception of the TRUST Team in September 2014, we have trained 12 peer mentors, 10 of whom currently still serve in that capacity. We have 3 additional peers awaiting training. To date, The TRUST team has supported 19 clinicians/staff, including 3 ACPs, 9 nurses, 6 physicians, and 1 other (pharmacist). Of those 10, 3 are still actively receiving support so closing data have yet to be collected. Of the 16 who have been closed, 6 were referred for ongoing support and 10 were able to return to baseline with TRUST Team Supports.

Related article:
Who is liable when a surgical error occurs?

Just surviving the medical error is not the goal

Medical errors are inevitable, and the effects on providers can be devastating. It is important that physicians and institutions are aware of the signs and symptoms of a second victim as well as provide support to them. Institutions must have a just culture in which all members of the health care team can come forward with medical errors without the fear of punishment. Ideally, these institutions also have a second-victim support system that identifies those who need assistance and assist all health care clinicians not only to survive the effects of medical errors but also to thrive after receiving the necessary support.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

An estimated 98,000 Americans die each year due to medical errors. This is an attention-grabbing statistic—from the year 2000.¹ A recent study (published in 2016) reported that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States, ranking just behind heart disease and cancer.²

As expected, much has been done to reduce medical errors and improve patient safety as a result of these publications. Quality, safety, and outcomes are paramount, as evidenced by the Institute of Health Care Improvement’s “triple aim”: reduce cost of care, improve quality of care, and improve patient outcomes.³

While these 3 aims are of paramount importance, this article seeks to portray the “quadruple aim,” with an additional focus on physician well-being. Patients and their families (first victims) are not the only ones affected by medical errors. Clinicians are, too, and these effects can be devastating. Here I offer concrete strategies to support providers involved in medical errors, including tips on developing a formal support program. First, however, I describe the devastating effects medical errors can have on providers and the signs of a second victim.

Related article:
Medical errors: Caring for the second victim (you)

The scope of the problem

In 2000, it was Dr. Albert Wu’s publication in The British Medical Journal titled “Medical Error: The Second Victim” (the doctor who makes mistakes needs help too), that first addressed this important topic.⁴ In his article he shared a case of another house officer who missed signs of a pericardial tamponade and was judged incompetent by peers due to his mistake.

As physicians, we do not intrinsically support colleagues who have experienced a medical error. We all have taken, with pride and commitment, our Hippocratic Oath of “do no harm,” yet we are often held to standards of perfection by society, peers, and, above all, ourselves. Have technologic wonders and precise laboratory tests supplanted the adage “doctors are only human”? Dr. Wu also points out in this landmark essay his observation and dismay at the lack of empathy, sympathy, and compassion shown by peers when medical errors occur. All of these elements are needed for the healing of those involved to take place. If they are not provided, dysfunctional coping mechanisms ensue.⁴

Incidence of medical errors

Despite the Institute of Medicine report from 2000¹ and the recent study from Johns Hopkins,² determining the exact number of errors and incidents is not easy. Most data reporting is sparse. A prospective longitudinal study of perceived medical errors and resident distress estimated medical errors to be between 5% and 10% in hospitalized patients, but that it could be up to 50%.⁵ According to a 2005 study, approximately one-third of internal medicine residents report at least 1 major medical error during their 3 years of training, while 18% of multidisciplinary residents report an adverse event under their care in the previous week.⁶

Related article:
Medical errors: Meeting ethical obligations and reducing liability with proper communication

Who is at risk of becoming a second victim?

Any and all clinicians can become a second victim, and the state can be realized at varying points in the process of an experienced medical error. The circumstances of the initial error and the severity of the effect on the patient and/or the damaged physician−patient relationship can affect whether or not there is a second victim. A second victim also can emerge as a result of peers’ or colleagues’ comments and lack of empathy or support. Certainly a lawsuit can produce a second victim.⁷

How often do physicians become second victims?

The prevalence of second victims has a large variation in estimates. A 2006 study estimates a prevalence of 10.4%.⁸ In 2010, the estimate was 30%, and a prevalence of 43.3% was reported in 2000.^9,10 Regarding emotional distress within a year of a major adverse event, 30% of almost 900 providers reported these feelings.¹¹ Other studies note 50% of health care workers reported feelings consistent with those of a second victim.⁷

Next: What are the symptoms of a second victim?

The signs of, and long-lasting risks for, a second victim

Second victims are at risk for several well-documented symptoms, regardless of their stage of training, including⁶:

• depression (in fact, they have a 3-fold risk)
• decrease in overall quality of life
• increase in burnout
• increase in feelings of distress, guilt, and shame, which may be long lasting.

Health care providers as second victims also may experience shock and hopelessness, sleep disturbance, social avoidance, intrusive thoughts and nightmares, and poor memory and concentration. Interestingly, these emotions and reactions are indistinguishable from posttraumatic stress disorder. These continued symptoms can have short- and long-term implications for physicians, patients, and the health care organization.¹²

Next: How to support those affected by a medical error

How to support all of those affected by a medical error

Over the past decade or so, much attention has been paid to creating safer health systems, improving outcomes and patient satisfaction, and recognizing the needs of patients and families of first victims when medical errors occur. Much less has been done to acknowledge and address the needs of struggling clinicians.

Provide nurturing discussions and sympathy

Hospital systems do have embedded processes to review outcomes and medical errors, including, among others, peer review, quality improvement, morbidity and mortality review, and root cause analysis. Unfortunately, often a “name, blame, shame game” can result from the overall process, with certain individuals or groups of individuals singled out, and only worsen the incidence and effects of the second victim. Ideally, system processes for addressing medical errors should allow for an environment more focused on nurturing discussions to prevent error and recognize all the factors contributing to an error.

Of course in any outcome or error investigation, the goal is to identify what happened, what factors contributed to the incident, and what can be done to prevent future occurrences. The concern for the family as priority is understandable, as is the desire to prevent a lawsuit. The lack of attention and sympathy to the health care provider involved contributes to the second victim.⁷

It is all too easy to blame, even in a Just Culture. Deficiencies in sympathy and attention can occur without a system whose culture is focused on “name, blame, shame.” A Just Culture, as defined by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, is one in which individuals come forward with a mistake without fear of punishment. Such a culture balances the need to learn from our mistakes and the need to have disciplinary action.¹³

David Marx, an outcomes engineer and author of “Whack a Mole: The Price We Pay for Expecting Perfection,” touts a Just Culture as one having the following sets of beliefs:

• recognition that professionals will make mistakes
• recognition that even professionals will develop unhealthy norms
• a fierce intolerance for reckless conduct.

He strongly asserts that human error be consoled while reckless behavior be punished.¹⁴ Punishing human error is a setup for the second victim.

Read on for tips to develop a coping program

Tips for developing a coping program

In 2009, Scott and colleagues described 6 stages of a second victim. These are:

• Stage 1: Chaos and event repair
• Stage 2: Intrusive thoughts, “what if”
• Stage 3: Restoring personal identity
• Stage 4: Enduring the inquisition
• Stage 5: Obtaining emotional first aid
• Stage 6: Moving on or dropping out; surviving and/or thriving

Throughout the stages, second victims look for support and share their experience of the medical error event, as well as their personal and professional impact of the error.¹⁵

A 2007 study that examined the emotional impact of medical errors on physicians revealed some startling data. A full 82% of physicians expressed interest in counseling to help cope with their distress. And 90% felt there was inadequate support at their hospitals or health care organizations for this distress.¹⁶

Use The Joint Commission’s toolkit

Unfortunately, there are only a few well-documented second-victim support programs in the United States, despite the growing evidence of the emotional distress that second victims experience. Many hospitals do not know how to develop or implement such a support system. Recognizing this challenge, The Joint Commission developed a toolkit to assist health care organizations in developing a second-victim program. The toolkit consists of 10 modules (TABLE) designed to assist organizations not only to implement a second-victim support process but also to customize it to their specific institutional culture. This toolkit can be downloaded for free or used online. Within the first year of its availability, over 6,000 people visited the website and there were more than 700 requests for a download.¹⁷

Follow forYOU’s example

An example and well-recognized second-victim support program is the “forYOU” team at the University of Missouri. The program is free to employees, confidential, and available 24-7. Its purpose is “providing care and support to our staff,” by helping members understand the phenomenon of the second victim and quickly returning members to a satisfying professional practice.¹⁸

The “forYOU” team was created in 2007 under the direction of the University of Missouri Health Care’s Office of Clinical Effectiveness with the goals of increasing institutional awareness, providing a second victim with a “safe zone,” and allowing for the expression of emotions and reactions in a confidential setting. Team members are multidisciplinary and include physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, social workers, and chaplains. They strive to normalize the feelings and thoughts second victims experience after a stressful outcome or event. Team members are highly trained in second-victim responses and the stages of coping. The program has established institutional actions to each of the 6 stages (FIGURE).¹⁹

Read on to learn how peer mentors are crucial to a support program

Establish TRUST

At the Carilion Clinic in Roanoke, Virginia, we too have developed a second-victim support program for all of our employees: TRUST. In the beginning stages, we quickly reaffirmed the challenges in developing such a program.

Initial challenges you will face. First, education on what a second victim is needs to be recognized. The fact that not everyone experiences second-victim emotions needs to be validated. Administrators and staff must be convinced that needing support is not a sign of weakness. And the program must ensure confidentiality and recruit mentors. These are just a few of the obstacles we faced on our path to program realization. Our journey to develop our second-victim program was approximately 5 years and required participation, affirmation, and support from all levels of the organization.

Our program name embodies its inherent purpose and goals. TRUST stands for:

• Treatment that is just. Second victims deserve the right of a presumption that their intentions were good, and should be able to depend on organizational leaders for integrity, fairness, just treatment, and shared accountability for outcomes.
• Respect. Second victims deserve respect and common decency and should not be blamed and shamed for human fallibility.
• Understanding and compassion. Second victims need compassionate help to grieve and heal.
• Supportive care. Second victims are entitled to psychological and support services that are delivered in a professional and organized way.
• Transparency and opportunity to contribute. Second victims have a right to participate in the learning gathered from the event, to share important causal information with the organization, and to be provided with an opportunity to heal by contributing to the prevention of future events.

Employ peer mentors, who serve a vital role

We have identified the need to develop a more direct and active approach to the TRUST program’s recruitment and established a subcommittee to begin this process. We began by asking leaders to nominate potential peer mentors and spoke about the program and asked for volunteers at various hospital committees. Once we had most disciplines represented, leaders were asked to take an assessment for emotional intelligence.

Other than the initial training for the TRUST program, the time requirement for participation for peer mentors is likely less than an hour per month. The dedicated time certainly is dependent on how much support the second victim is requiring, however, and varies. We encourage the peer supporters to be aware of their time constraints and establish parameters for the relationship in a direct but supportive way.

Since the inception of the TRUST Team in September 2014, we have trained 12 peer mentors, 10 of whom currently still serve in that capacity. We have 3 additional peers awaiting training. To date, The TRUST team has supported 19 clinicians/staff, including 3 ACPs, 9 nurses, 6 physicians, and 1 other (pharmacist). Of those 10, 3 are still actively receiving support so closing data have yet to be collected. Of the 16 who have been closed, 6 were referred for ongoing support and 10 were able to return to baseline with TRUST Team Supports.

Related article:
Who is liable when a surgical error occurs?

Just surviving the medical error is not the goal

Medical errors are inevitable, and the effects on providers can be devastating. It is important that physicians and institutions are aware of the signs and symptoms of a second victim as well as provide support to them. Institutions must have a just culture in which all members of the health care team can come forward with medical errors without the fear of punishment. Ideally, these institutions also have a second-victim support system that identifies those who need assistance and assist all health care clinicians not only to survive the effects of medical errors but also to thrive after receiving the necessary support.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Technology has changed--and continues to change--the practice of medicine. Health care providers access word processing programs, e-mail, and electronic medical records using desktop and laptop computers. Now, providers are accessing these same tools with handheld devices such as smartphones, tablets, and "phablets" (a class of mobile devices designed to combine the form of a smartphone and a tablet).

Critical to the popularity and functionality of handheld devices are mobile applications, also known as "apps." An app is a self-contained program or piece of software designed to run on handheld devices to perform a specific purpose. App overload and app inaccuracy, however, are major problems. Health care providers do not have the time to search through thousands of medical apps in app stores to find specialty-related apps that might be useful in their practice--or to check the accuracy of those apps.

Vetted apps for ObGyns

My team's research has focused on identifying apps for ObGyns to use in clinical practice.¹ In the process, we have developed the APPLICATIONS scoring system, which contains objective and subjective components to help differentiate among the accurate apps.² This new quarterly "App review" series in OBG Management will showcase recommended apps for the busy ObGyn in the hope of improving work efficiency and the provider-patient relationship.

First up: Apps for calculating the date of delivery. This first app review focuses on pregnancy wheels, or due date calculators. Calculator apps are preferred over other types of apps such as procedure/case documentation apps, as providers use smartphones at point of care to allow rapid decision making.³ Calculating the estimated date of delivery (EDD) and gestational age (GA) is an important, vital task for providers of obstetric care. In fact, new guidelines for calculating EDD were recently developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM).⁴ Notably, pregnancy wheel apps are more accurate than paper wheels.5 My team checked the accuracy of the pregnancy wheel apps by applying strict criteria to ensure the correct EDD and GA and then scored them in a systematic, nonbiased, conflict-of-interest-free manner.²

Related article:
Elective induction of labor at 39 (vs 41) weeks: Caveats and considerations
 

The TABLE below lists the top 3 recommended pregnancy wheel or due date calculator apps vetted by our research. The apps are listed alphabetically, and details for each app are provided based on a shortened version of the APPLICATIONS scoring system, APPLI--app comprehensiveness, price, platform, literature use, and important special features.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Technology has changed--and continues to change--the practice of medicine. Health care providers access word processing programs, e-mail, and electronic medical records using desktop and laptop computers. Now, providers are accessing these same tools with handheld devices such as smartphones, tablets, and "phablets" (a class of mobile devices designed to combine the form of a smartphone and a tablet).

Critical to the popularity and functionality of handheld devices are mobile applications, also known as "apps." An app is a self-contained program or piece of software designed to run on handheld devices to perform a specific purpose. App overload and app inaccuracy, however, are major problems. Health care providers do not have the time to search through thousands of medical apps in app stores to find specialty-related apps that might be useful in their practice--or to check the accuracy of those apps.

Vetted apps for ObGyns

My team's research has focused on identifying apps for ObGyns to use in clinical practice.¹ In the process, we have developed the APPLICATIONS scoring system, which contains objective and subjective components to help differentiate among the accurate apps.² This new quarterly "App review" series in OBG Management will showcase recommended apps for the busy ObGyn in the hope of improving work efficiency and the provider-patient relationship.

First up: Apps for calculating the date of delivery. This first app review focuses on pregnancy wheels, or due date calculators. Calculator apps are preferred over other types of apps such as procedure/case documentation apps, as providers use smartphones at point of care to allow rapid decision making.³ Calculating the estimated date of delivery (EDD) and gestational age (GA) is an important, vital task for providers of obstetric care. In fact, new guidelines for calculating EDD were recently developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM).⁴ Notably, pregnancy wheel apps are more accurate than paper wheels.5 My team checked the accuracy of the pregnancy wheel apps by applying strict criteria to ensure the correct EDD and GA and then scored them in a systematic, nonbiased, conflict-of-interest-free manner.²

Related article:
Elective induction of labor at 39 (vs 41) weeks: Caveats and considerations
 

The TABLE below lists the top 3 recommended pregnancy wheel or due date calculator apps vetted by our research. The apps are listed alphabetically, and details for each app are provided based on a shortened version of the APPLICATIONS scoring system, APPLI--app comprehensiveness, price, platform, literature use, and important special features.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Technology has changed--and continues to change--the practice of medicine. Health care providers access word processing programs, e-mail, and electronic medical records using desktop and laptop computers. Now, providers are accessing these same tools with handheld devices such as smartphones, tablets, and "phablets" (a class of mobile devices designed to combine the form of a smartphone and a tablet).

Critical to the popularity and functionality of handheld devices are mobile applications, also known as "apps." An app is a self-contained program or piece of software designed to run on handheld devices to perform a specific purpose. App overload and app inaccuracy, however, are major problems. Health care providers do not have the time to search through thousands of medical apps in app stores to find specialty-related apps that might be useful in their practice--or to check the accuracy of those apps.

Vetted apps for ObGyns

My team's research has focused on identifying apps for ObGyns to use in clinical practice.¹ In the process, we have developed the APPLICATIONS scoring system, which contains objective and subjective components to help differentiate among the accurate apps.² This new quarterly "App review" series in OBG Management will showcase recommended apps for the busy ObGyn in the hope of improving work efficiency and the provider-patient relationship.

First up: Apps for calculating the date of delivery. This first app review focuses on pregnancy wheels, or due date calculators. Calculator apps are preferred over other types of apps such as procedure/case documentation apps, as providers use smartphones at point of care to allow rapid decision making.³ Calculating the estimated date of delivery (EDD) and gestational age (GA) is an important, vital task for providers of obstetric care. In fact, new guidelines for calculating EDD were recently developed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM).⁴ Notably, pregnancy wheel apps are more accurate than paper wheels.5 My team checked the accuracy of the pregnancy wheel apps by applying strict criteria to ensure the correct EDD and GA and then scored them in a systematic, nonbiased, conflict-of-interest-free manner.²

Related article:
Elective induction of labor at 39 (vs 41) weeks: Caveats and considerations
 

The TABLE below lists the top 3 recommended pregnancy wheel or due date calculator apps vetted by our research. The apps are listed alphabetically, and details for each app are provided based on a shortened version of the APPLICATIONS scoring system, APPLI--app comprehensiveness, price, platform, literature use, and important special features.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Cancer patient receiving
chemotherapy
Photo by Rhoda Baer

Results of a small study suggest a single dose of the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin, when combined with counseling, can significantly lessen psychological distress in cancer patients for months at a time.

The study showed that psychological counseling and a single dose of psilocybin brought relief from distress that lasted for more than 6 months in a majority of the subjects monitored.

This was based on clinical evaluation scores for anxiety and depression.

“Our results represent the strongest evidence to date of a clinical benefit from psilocybin therapy, with the potential to transform care for patients with cancer-related psychological distress,” said study author Stephen Ross, MD, of New York University School of Medicine in New York, New York.

“If larger clinical trials prove successful, then we could ultimately have available a safe, effective, and inexpensive medication—dispensed under strict control—to alleviate the distress that increases suicide rates among cancer patients.”

Dr Ross and his colleagues reported the results of their study in the Journal of Psychopharmacology alongside a related study and 11 accompanying editorials.

Dr Ross’s study included 29 patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression. Their mean age was 56, and 62% were female. Ninety percent were Caucasian, and 10% were classified as “other” race.

Patients had breast cancer (31%), reproductive cancers (28%), digestive cancers (17%), leukemia/lymphoma (14%), and other cancers (10%).

All patients had been diagnosed as suffering from serious psychological distress related to their disease.

Treatment

Half of the patients were randomly assigned to receive a 0.3 mg/kg dose of psilocybin, and half received a vitamin placebo (250 mg of niacin) known to produce a “rush” that mimics a hallucinogenic drug experience.

Approximately half way through the study’s monitoring period (after 7 weeks), all patients switched treatments. Those who initially received psilocybin took a single dose of niacin, and vice-versa. Neither patients nor researchers knew who had first received psilocybin or placebo.

All patients were provided with tailored counseling from a psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse, or social worker. And the patients were monitored for side effects and improvements in their mental state.

Safety

The researchers said there were no serious adverse events (AEs), either medical or psychiatric, that were attributed to psilocybin.

The most common medical AEs that were attributable to psilocybin were non-clinically significant elevations in blood pressure and heart rate (76%), headaches/migraines (28%), and nausea (14%).

The most common psychiatric AEs attributable to psilocybin were transient anxiety (17%) and transient psychotic-like symptoms (7%; 1 case of transient paranoid ideation and 1 case of transient thought disorder).
 
Efficacy

The researchers said that, prior to the crossover, psilocybin produced immediate, substantial, and sustained improvements in anxiety and depression.

Specifically, patients who received psilocybin first had significant improvements in responses on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory, when compared to patients who received niacin first.

The differences were significant 1 day after the patients’ first session and 7 weeks after the first session (P≤0.01 for all).

At the 6.5-month follow-up, 60% to 80% of participants continued with clinically significant reductions in depression or anxiety.

The researchers said a key finding of this study was that improvements in clinical evaluation scores for anxiety and depression lasted for the study’s extended monitoring period, which was 8 months for those who took psilocybin first.

Patients also reported post-psilocybin improvements in their quality of life, such as going out more, greater energy, getting along better with family members, and doing well at work. Some reported variations of spirituality, unusual peacefulness, and increased feelings of altruism.

“Our study showed that psilocybin facilitated experiences that drove reductions in psychological distress,” said study author Anthony Bossis, PhD, of New York University School of Medicine. “And if it’s true for cancer care, then it could apply to other stressful medical conditions.”

He cautioned that patients should not consume psilocybin on their own or without supervision from a physician and a trained counselor.

“Psilocybin therapy may not work for everyone,” he noted. “And some groups, such as people with schizophrenia, as well as adolescents, should not be treated with it.”

Cancer patient receiving
chemotherapy
Photo by Rhoda Baer

Results of a small study suggest a single dose of the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin, when combined with counseling, can significantly lessen psychological distress in cancer patients for months at a time.

The study showed that psychological counseling and a single dose of psilocybin brought relief from distress that lasted for more than 6 months in a majority of the subjects monitored.

This was based on clinical evaluation scores for anxiety and depression.

“Our results represent the strongest evidence to date of a clinical benefit from psilocybin therapy, with the potential to transform care for patients with cancer-related psychological distress,” said study author Stephen Ross, MD, of New York University School of Medicine in New York, New York.

“If larger clinical trials prove successful, then we could ultimately have available a safe, effective, and inexpensive medication—dispensed under strict control—to alleviate the distress that increases suicide rates among cancer patients.”

Dr Ross and his colleagues reported the results of their study in the Journal of Psychopharmacology alongside a related study and 11 accompanying editorials.

Dr Ross’s study included 29 patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression. Their mean age was 56, and 62% were female. Ninety percent were Caucasian, and 10% were classified as “other” race.

Patients had breast cancer (31%), reproductive cancers (28%), digestive cancers (17%), leukemia/lymphoma (14%), and other cancers (10%).

All patients had been diagnosed as suffering from serious psychological distress related to their disease.

Treatment

Half of the patients were randomly assigned to receive a 0.3 mg/kg dose of psilocybin, and half received a vitamin placebo (250 mg of niacin) known to produce a “rush” that mimics a hallucinogenic drug experience.

Approximately half way through the study’s monitoring period (after 7 weeks), all patients switched treatments. Those who initially received psilocybin took a single dose of niacin, and vice-versa. Neither patients nor researchers knew who had first received psilocybin or placebo.

All patients were provided with tailored counseling from a psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse, or social worker. And the patients were monitored for side effects and improvements in their mental state.

Safety

The researchers said there were no serious adverse events (AEs), either medical or psychiatric, that were attributed to psilocybin.

The most common medical AEs that were attributable to psilocybin were non-clinically significant elevations in blood pressure and heart rate (76%), headaches/migraines (28%), and nausea (14%).

The most common psychiatric AEs attributable to psilocybin were transient anxiety (17%) and transient psychotic-like symptoms (7%; 1 case of transient paranoid ideation and 1 case of transient thought disorder).
 
Efficacy

The researchers said that, prior to the crossover, psilocybin produced immediate, substantial, and sustained improvements in anxiety and depression.

Specifically, patients who received psilocybin first had significant improvements in responses on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory, when compared to patients who received niacin first.

The differences were significant 1 day after the patients’ first session and 7 weeks after the first session (P≤0.01 for all).

At the 6.5-month follow-up, 60% to 80% of participants continued with clinically significant reductions in depression or anxiety.

The researchers said a key finding of this study was that improvements in clinical evaluation scores for anxiety and depression lasted for the study’s extended monitoring period, which was 8 months for those who took psilocybin first.

Patients also reported post-psilocybin improvements in their quality of life, such as going out more, greater energy, getting along better with family members, and doing well at work. Some reported variations of spirituality, unusual peacefulness, and increased feelings of altruism.

“Our study showed that psilocybin facilitated experiences that drove reductions in psychological distress,” said study author Anthony Bossis, PhD, of New York University School of Medicine. “And if it’s true for cancer care, then it could apply to other stressful medical conditions.”

He cautioned that patients should not consume psilocybin on their own or without supervision from a physician and a trained counselor.

“Psilocybin therapy may not work for everyone,” he noted. “And some groups, such as people with schizophrenia, as well as adolescents, should not be treated with it.”

Cancer patient receiving
chemotherapy
Photo by Rhoda Baer

Results of a small study suggest a single dose of the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin, when combined with counseling, can significantly lessen psychological distress in cancer patients for months at a time.

The study showed that psychological counseling and a single dose of psilocybin brought relief from distress that lasted for more than 6 months in a majority of the subjects monitored.

This was based on clinical evaluation scores for anxiety and depression.

“Our results represent the strongest evidence to date of a clinical benefit from psilocybin therapy, with the potential to transform care for patients with cancer-related psychological distress,” said study author Stephen Ross, MD, of New York University School of Medicine in New York, New York.

“If larger clinical trials prove successful, then we could ultimately have available a safe, effective, and inexpensive medication—dispensed under strict control—to alleviate the distress that increases suicide rates among cancer patients.”

Dr Ross and his colleagues reported the results of their study in the Journal of Psychopharmacology alongside a related study and 11 accompanying editorials.

Dr Ross’s study included 29 patients with cancer-related anxiety and depression. Their mean age was 56, and 62% were female. Ninety percent were Caucasian, and 10% were classified as “other” race.

Patients had breast cancer (31%), reproductive cancers (28%), digestive cancers (17%), leukemia/lymphoma (14%), and other cancers (10%).

All patients had been diagnosed as suffering from serious psychological distress related to their disease.

Treatment

Half of the patients were randomly assigned to receive a 0.3 mg/kg dose of psilocybin, and half received a vitamin placebo (250 mg of niacin) known to produce a “rush” that mimics a hallucinogenic drug experience.

Approximately half way through the study’s monitoring period (after 7 weeks), all patients switched treatments. Those who initially received psilocybin took a single dose of niacin, and vice-versa. Neither patients nor researchers knew who had first received psilocybin or placebo.

All patients were provided with tailored counseling from a psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse, or social worker. And the patients were monitored for side effects and improvements in their mental state.

Safety

The researchers said there were no serious adverse events (AEs), either medical or psychiatric, that were attributed to psilocybin.

The most common medical AEs that were attributable to psilocybin were non-clinically significant elevations in blood pressure and heart rate (76%), headaches/migraines (28%), and nausea (14%).

The most common psychiatric AEs attributable to psilocybin were transient anxiety (17%) and transient psychotic-like symptoms (7%; 1 case of transient paranoid ideation and 1 case of transient thought disorder).
 
Efficacy

The researchers said that, prior to the crossover, psilocybin produced immediate, substantial, and sustained improvements in anxiety and depression.

Specifically, patients who received psilocybin first had significant improvements in responses on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory, when compared to patients who received niacin first.

The differences were significant 1 day after the patients’ first session and 7 weeks after the first session (P≤0.01 for all).

At the 6.5-month follow-up, 60% to 80% of participants continued with clinically significant reductions in depression or anxiety.

The researchers said a key finding of this study was that improvements in clinical evaluation scores for anxiety and depression lasted for the study’s extended monitoring period, which was 8 months for those who took psilocybin first.

Patients also reported post-psilocybin improvements in their quality of life, such as going out more, greater energy, getting along better with family members, and doing well at work. Some reported variations of spirituality, unusual peacefulness, and increased feelings of altruism.

“Our study showed that psilocybin facilitated experiences that drove reductions in psychological distress,” said study author Anthony Bossis, PhD, of New York University School of Medicine. “And if it’s true for cancer care, then it could apply to other stressful medical conditions.”

He cautioned that patients should not consume psilocybin on their own or without supervision from a physician and a trained counselor.

“Psilocybin therapy may not work for everyone,” he noted. “And some groups, such as people with schizophrenia, as well as adolescents, should not be treated with it.”

Enterococcus bacteria
Photo courtesy of
Janice Carr/CDC

The quest to understand a prolonged infection in an infant with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to the discovery of a mutation that allows bacteria to tolerate antibiotic therapy.

Researchers described this discovery in the journal mBio.

“These findings detail a ‘perfect storm’ for development of antibiotic tolerance by bacteria that already pose a clinical challenge,” said study author Jason Rosch, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“The same conditions may be present in other patients with immune systems that have been compromised by chemotherapy or disease,” added co-author Joshua Wolf, MBBS, also of St. Jude.

The “perfect storm” involved a patient who was 6 weeks old when she was diagnosed with AML. The treatment wiped out her white blood cells, and, despite infection-control measures, she developed a bloodstream infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE).

The infection persisted for 26 days and only resolved after her immune system recovered. She then successfully completed AML treatment.

In-depth DNA sequencing of 22 VRE samples collected during the patient’s infection helped researchers link the prolonged infection to a point mutation in the relA gene of VRE.

The mutation inappropriately activated the stringent response pathway, which bacteria use to survive under stress and to tolerate antibiotics.

The mutation resulted in elevated levels of the signaling molecule alarmone, and this likely primed the bacteria to survive exposure to multiple antibiotics, the researchers said.

The team also noted that relA-mutant VRE was susceptible to the antibiotics linezolid and daptomycin in minimum inhibitory concentration testing and during planktonic growth.

However, when growing in biofilm, relA-mutant VRE could tolerate high doses of both antibiotics.

“This mutation has particular clinical significance because the antibiotics involved, linezolid and daptomycin, are the last line of defense against VRE infection,” Dr Wolf said.

Among the compounds in development for the treatment of bacterial biofilms is the experimental antibiotic ADEP-4. In this study, ADEP-4 killed relA-mutant and non-mutant VRE growing in biofilm in the lab.

“In the future, compounds like ADEP-4 may provide a new approach to resolving persistent infections,” Dr Wolf said.

Dr Rosch noted that evidence gleaned from tracking the evolution of VRE throughout the infection suggested the patient’s immune-compromised state was essential to survival of the mutant VRE.

Gene transcription was altered significantly in relA-mutant VRE and produced biofilms that were less robust and possibly unlikely to otherwise survive.

“The case expands our understanding of the role of the stringent response in susceptibility and tolerance to a wide range of antibiotics, especially in biofilms,” Dr Rosch said. “It also demonstrates that these mutations can develop and gain a foothold during a human infection.”

Enterococcus bacteria
Photo courtesy of
Janice Carr/CDC

The quest to understand a prolonged infection in an infant with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to the discovery of a mutation that allows bacteria to tolerate antibiotic therapy.

Researchers described this discovery in the journal mBio.

“These findings detail a ‘perfect storm’ for development of antibiotic tolerance by bacteria that already pose a clinical challenge,” said study author Jason Rosch, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“The same conditions may be present in other patients with immune systems that have been compromised by chemotherapy or disease,” added co-author Joshua Wolf, MBBS, also of St. Jude.

The “perfect storm” involved a patient who was 6 weeks old when she was diagnosed with AML. The treatment wiped out her white blood cells, and, despite infection-control measures, she developed a bloodstream infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE).

The infection persisted for 26 days and only resolved after her immune system recovered. She then successfully completed AML treatment.

In-depth DNA sequencing of 22 VRE samples collected during the patient’s infection helped researchers link the prolonged infection to a point mutation in the relA gene of VRE.

The mutation inappropriately activated the stringent response pathway, which bacteria use to survive under stress and to tolerate antibiotics.

The mutation resulted in elevated levels of the signaling molecule alarmone, and this likely primed the bacteria to survive exposure to multiple antibiotics, the researchers said.

The team also noted that relA-mutant VRE was susceptible to the antibiotics linezolid and daptomycin in minimum inhibitory concentration testing and during planktonic growth.

However, when growing in biofilm, relA-mutant VRE could tolerate high doses of both antibiotics.

“This mutation has particular clinical significance because the antibiotics involved, linezolid and daptomycin, are the last line of defense against VRE infection,” Dr Wolf said.

Among the compounds in development for the treatment of bacterial biofilms is the experimental antibiotic ADEP-4. In this study, ADEP-4 killed relA-mutant and non-mutant VRE growing in biofilm in the lab.

“In the future, compounds like ADEP-4 may provide a new approach to resolving persistent infections,” Dr Wolf said.

Dr Rosch noted that evidence gleaned from tracking the evolution of VRE throughout the infection suggested the patient’s immune-compromised state was essential to survival of the mutant VRE.

Gene transcription was altered significantly in relA-mutant VRE and produced biofilms that were less robust and possibly unlikely to otherwise survive.

“The case expands our understanding of the role of the stringent response in susceptibility and tolerance to a wide range of antibiotics, especially in biofilms,” Dr Rosch said. “It also demonstrates that these mutations can develop and gain a foothold during a human infection.”

Enterococcus bacteria
Photo courtesy of
Janice Carr/CDC

The quest to understand a prolonged infection in an infant with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to the discovery of a mutation that allows bacteria to tolerate antibiotic therapy.

Researchers described this discovery in the journal mBio.

“These findings detail a ‘perfect storm’ for development of antibiotic tolerance by bacteria that already pose a clinical challenge,” said study author Jason Rosch, PhD, of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

“The same conditions may be present in other patients with immune systems that have been compromised by chemotherapy or disease,” added co-author Joshua Wolf, MBBS, also of St. Jude.

The “perfect storm” involved a patient who was 6 weeks old when she was diagnosed with AML. The treatment wiped out her white blood cells, and, despite infection-control measures, she developed a bloodstream infection with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE).

The infection persisted for 26 days and only resolved after her immune system recovered. She then successfully completed AML treatment.

In-depth DNA sequencing of 22 VRE samples collected during the patient’s infection helped researchers link the prolonged infection to a point mutation in the relA gene of VRE.

The mutation inappropriately activated the stringent response pathway, which bacteria use to survive under stress and to tolerate antibiotics.

The mutation resulted in elevated levels of the signaling molecule alarmone, and this likely primed the bacteria to survive exposure to multiple antibiotics, the researchers said.

The team also noted that relA-mutant VRE was susceptible to the antibiotics linezolid and daptomycin in minimum inhibitory concentration testing and during planktonic growth.

However, when growing in biofilm, relA-mutant VRE could tolerate high doses of both antibiotics.

“This mutation has particular clinical significance because the antibiotics involved, linezolid and daptomycin, are the last line of defense against VRE infection,” Dr Wolf said.

Among the compounds in development for the treatment of bacterial biofilms is the experimental antibiotic ADEP-4. In this study, ADEP-4 killed relA-mutant and non-mutant VRE growing in biofilm in the lab.

“In the future, compounds like ADEP-4 may provide a new approach to resolving persistent infections,” Dr Wolf said.

Dr Rosch noted that evidence gleaned from tracking the evolution of VRE throughout the infection suggested the patient’s immune-compromised state was essential to survival of the mutant VRE.

Gene transcription was altered significantly in relA-mutant VRE and produced biofilms that were less robust and possibly unlikely to otherwise survive.

“The case expands our understanding of the role of the stringent response in susceptibility and tolerance to a wide range of antibiotics, especially in biofilms,” Dr Rosch said. “It also demonstrates that these mutations can develop and gain a foothold during a human infection.”

Cancer patient receiving
chemotherapy
Photo by Rhoda Baer

One-time treatment with the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin may provide long-term relief of existential anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancers, according to a small study.

After receiving a single high dose of the drug, most of the patients studied reported decreases in depression and anxiety as well as increases in quality of life and optimism.

These improvements were sustained at 6 months of follow-up.

“The most interesting and remarkable finding is that a single dose of psilocybin, which lasts 4 to 6 hours, produced enduring decreases in depression and anxiety symptoms, and this may represent a fascinating new model for treating some psychiatric conditions,” said study author Roland Griffiths, PhD, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.

Dr Griffiths said this study grew out of a decade of research at Johns Hopkins on the effects of psilocybin in healthy volunteers, which showed that psilocybin can consistently produce positive changes in mood, behavior, and spirituality when administered to carefully screened and prepared participants.

The current study was designed to see if psilocybin could produce similar results in psychologically distressed cancer patients.

The results were published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology alongside a similar study and 11 accompanying editorials.

For their study, Dr Griffiths and his colleagues recruited 51 participants diagnosed with life-threatening cancers, most of which were recurrent or metastatic.

Types of cancer included breast (n=13), upper aerodigestive (n=7), gastrointestinal (n=4), genitourinary (n=18), and “other” cancers (n=1), as well as hematologic malignancies (n=8).

All participants had been given a formal psychiatric diagnosis, including an anxiety or depressive disorder.

Half of the participants were female, and they had an average age of 56. Ninety-two percent were white, 4% were black, and 2% were Asian.

Treatment

Each participant had 2 treatment sessions scheduled 5 weeks apart. In 1 session, they received a capsule containing a very low dose (1 or 3 mg per 70 kg) of psilocybin that was meant to act as a “control” because the dose was too low to produce effects.

In the other session, participants received a capsule with what is considered a moderate or high dose (22 or 30 mg per 70 kg).

To minimize expectancy effects, the participants and the staff members supervising the sessions were told that participants would receive psilocybin on both sessions, but they did not know that all participants would receive a high dose and a low dose.

Blood pressure and mood were monitored throughout the sessions.

Two monitors aided participants during each session, encouraging them to lie down, wear an eye mask, listen to music through headphones, and direct their attention on their inner experience. If anxiety or confusion arose, the monitors provided reassurance to the participants.

Participants, staff, and community observers rated participants’ moods, attitudes, and behaviors throughout the study.

The researchers assessed each participant via questionnaires and structured interviews before the first session, 7 hours after taking the psilocybin, 5 weeks after each session, and 6 months after the second session.

Adverse events

Thirty-four percent of participants had an episode of elevated systolic blood pressure (>160 mm Hg at 1 or more time-point) in the high-dose psilocybin session, and 17% of participants had such an episode in the low-dose session.

Thirteen percent and 2%, respectively, had an episode of elevated diastolic blood pressure (>100 mm Hg at 1 or more time-point). None of these episodes met criteria for medical intervention.

During the high-dose psilocybin session, 15% of patients experienced nausea or vomiting. There were no such events during the low-dose session.

Three participants reported mild to moderate headaches after the high-dose session.

Twenty-one percent of patients reported physical discomfort during the high-dose session, as did 8% of patients during the low-dose session.

Psychological discomfort occurred in 32% and 12% of participants, respectively. The researchers said there were no cases of hallucinogen persisting perception disorder or prolonged psychosis.

Efficacy outcomes

Most participants reported experiencing changes in visual perception, emotions, and thinking after taking high-dose psilocybin. They also reported experiences of psychological insight and profound, deeply meaningful experiences.

Six months after the final session of treatment, about 80% of participants continued to show clinically significant decreases in depressed mood and anxiety, according to clinician assessment.

According to the participants themselves, 83% had increases in well-being or life satisfaction at 6 months after treatment.

Sixty-seven percent of participants rated the experience as one of the top 5 meaningful experiences in their lives, and 70% rated the experience as one of their top 5 spiritually significant lifetime events.

“Before beginning the study, it wasn’t clear to me that this treatment would be helpful, since cancer patients may experience profound hopelessness in response to their diagnosis, which is often followed by multiple surgeries and prolonged chemotherapy,” Dr Griffiths said.

“I could imagine that cancer patients would receive psilocybin, look into the existential void, and come out even more fearful. However, the positive changes in attitudes, moods, and behavior that we documented in healthy volunteers were replicated in cancer patients.”

Cancer patient receiving
chemotherapy
Photo by Rhoda Baer

One-time treatment with the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin may provide long-term relief of existential anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancers, according to a small study.

After receiving a single high dose of the drug, most of the patients studied reported decreases in depression and anxiety as well as increases in quality of life and optimism.

These improvements were sustained at 6 months of follow-up.

“The most interesting and remarkable finding is that a single dose of psilocybin, which lasts 4 to 6 hours, produced enduring decreases in depression and anxiety symptoms, and this may represent a fascinating new model for treating some psychiatric conditions,” said study author Roland Griffiths, PhD, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.

Dr Griffiths said this study grew out of a decade of research at Johns Hopkins on the effects of psilocybin in healthy volunteers, which showed that psilocybin can consistently produce positive changes in mood, behavior, and spirituality when administered to carefully screened and prepared participants.

The current study was designed to see if psilocybin could produce similar results in psychologically distressed cancer patients.

The results were published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology alongside a similar study and 11 accompanying editorials.

For their study, Dr Griffiths and his colleagues recruited 51 participants diagnosed with life-threatening cancers, most of which were recurrent or metastatic.

Types of cancer included breast (n=13), upper aerodigestive (n=7), gastrointestinal (n=4), genitourinary (n=18), and “other” cancers (n=1), as well as hematologic malignancies (n=8).

All participants had been given a formal psychiatric diagnosis, including an anxiety or depressive disorder.

Half of the participants were female, and they had an average age of 56. Ninety-two percent were white, 4% were black, and 2% were Asian.

Treatment

Each participant had 2 treatment sessions scheduled 5 weeks apart. In 1 session, they received a capsule containing a very low dose (1 or 3 mg per 70 kg) of psilocybin that was meant to act as a “control” because the dose was too low to produce effects.

In the other session, participants received a capsule with what is considered a moderate or high dose (22 or 30 mg per 70 kg).

To minimize expectancy effects, the participants and the staff members supervising the sessions were told that participants would receive psilocybin on both sessions, but they did not know that all participants would receive a high dose and a low dose.

Blood pressure and mood were monitored throughout the sessions.

Two monitors aided participants during each session, encouraging them to lie down, wear an eye mask, listen to music through headphones, and direct their attention on their inner experience. If anxiety or confusion arose, the monitors provided reassurance to the participants.

Participants, staff, and community observers rated participants’ moods, attitudes, and behaviors throughout the study.

The researchers assessed each participant via questionnaires and structured interviews before the first session, 7 hours after taking the psilocybin, 5 weeks after each session, and 6 months after the second session.

Adverse events

Thirty-four percent of participants had an episode of elevated systolic blood pressure (>160 mm Hg at 1 or more time-point) in the high-dose psilocybin session, and 17% of participants had such an episode in the low-dose session.

Thirteen percent and 2%, respectively, had an episode of elevated diastolic blood pressure (>100 mm Hg at 1 or more time-point). None of these episodes met criteria for medical intervention.

During the high-dose psilocybin session, 15% of patients experienced nausea or vomiting. There were no such events during the low-dose session.

Three participants reported mild to moderate headaches after the high-dose session.

Twenty-one percent of patients reported physical discomfort during the high-dose session, as did 8% of patients during the low-dose session.

Psychological discomfort occurred in 32% and 12% of participants, respectively. The researchers said there were no cases of hallucinogen persisting perception disorder or prolonged psychosis.

Efficacy outcomes

Most participants reported experiencing changes in visual perception, emotions, and thinking after taking high-dose psilocybin. They also reported experiences of psychological insight and profound, deeply meaningful experiences.

Six months after the final session of treatment, about 80% of participants continued to show clinically significant decreases in depressed mood and anxiety, according to clinician assessment.

According to the participants themselves, 83% had increases in well-being or life satisfaction at 6 months after treatment.

Sixty-seven percent of participants rated the experience as one of the top 5 meaningful experiences in their lives, and 70% rated the experience as one of their top 5 spiritually significant lifetime events.

“Before beginning the study, it wasn’t clear to me that this treatment would be helpful, since cancer patients may experience profound hopelessness in response to their diagnosis, which is often followed by multiple surgeries and prolonged chemotherapy,” Dr Griffiths said.

“I could imagine that cancer patients would receive psilocybin, look into the existential void, and come out even more fearful. However, the positive changes in attitudes, moods, and behavior that we documented in healthy volunteers were replicated in cancer patients.”

Cancer patient receiving
chemotherapy
Photo by Rhoda Baer

One-time treatment with the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin may provide long-term relief of existential anxiety in patients with life-threatening cancers, according to a small study.

After receiving a single high dose of the drug, most of the patients studied reported decreases in depression and anxiety as well as increases in quality of life and optimism.

These improvements were sustained at 6 months of follow-up.

“The most interesting and remarkable finding is that a single dose of psilocybin, which lasts 4 to 6 hours, produced enduring decreases in depression and anxiety symptoms, and this may represent a fascinating new model for treating some psychiatric conditions,” said study author Roland Griffiths, PhD, of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.

Dr Griffiths said this study grew out of a decade of research at Johns Hopkins on the effects of psilocybin in healthy volunteers, which showed that psilocybin can consistently produce positive changes in mood, behavior, and spirituality when administered to carefully screened and prepared participants.

The current study was designed to see if psilocybin could produce similar results in psychologically distressed cancer patients.

The results were published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology alongside a similar study and 11 accompanying editorials.

For their study, Dr Griffiths and his colleagues recruited 51 participants diagnosed with life-threatening cancers, most of which were recurrent or metastatic.

Types of cancer included breast (n=13), upper aerodigestive (n=7), gastrointestinal (n=4), genitourinary (n=18), and “other” cancers (n=1), as well as hematologic malignancies (n=8).

All participants had been given a formal psychiatric diagnosis, including an anxiety or depressive disorder.

Half of the participants were female, and they had an average age of 56. Ninety-two percent were white, 4% were black, and 2% were Asian.

Treatment

Each participant had 2 treatment sessions scheduled 5 weeks apart. In 1 session, they received a capsule containing a very low dose (1 or 3 mg per 70 kg) of psilocybin that was meant to act as a “control” because the dose was too low to produce effects.

In the other session, participants received a capsule with what is considered a moderate or high dose (22 or 30 mg per 70 kg).

To minimize expectancy effects, the participants and the staff members supervising the sessions were told that participants would receive psilocybin on both sessions, but they did not know that all participants would receive a high dose and a low dose.

Blood pressure and mood were monitored throughout the sessions.

Two monitors aided participants during each session, encouraging them to lie down, wear an eye mask, listen to music through headphones, and direct their attention on their inner experience. If anxiety or confusion arose, the monitors provided reassurance to the participants.

Participants, staff, and community observers rated participants’ moods, attitudes, and behaviors throughout the study.

The researchers assessed each participant via questionnaires and structured interviews before the first session, 7 hours after taking the psilocybin, 5 weeks after each session, and 6 months after the second session.

Adverse events

Thirty-four percent of participants had an episode of elevated systolic blood pressure (>160 mm Hg at 1 or more time-point) in the high-dose psilocybin session, and 17% of participants had such an episode in the low-dose session.

Thirteen percent and 2%, respectively, had an episode of elevated diastolic blood pressure (>100 mm Hg at 1 or more time-point). None of these episodes met criteria for medical intervention.

During the high-dose psilocybin session, 15% of patients experienced nausea or vomiting. There were no such events during the low-dose session.

Three participants reported mild to moderate headaches after the high-dose session.

Twenty-one percent of patients reported physical discomfort during the high-dose session, as did 8% of patients during the low-dose session.

Psychological discomfort occurred in 32% and 12% of participants, respectively. The researchers said there were no cases of hallucinogen persisting perception disorder or prolonged psychosis.

Efficacy outcomes

Most participants reported experiencing changes in visual perception, emotions, and thinking after taking high-dose psilocybin. They also reported experiences of psychological insight and profound, deeply meaningful experiences.

Six months after the final session of treatment, about 80% of participants continued to show clinically significant decreases in depressed mood and anxiety, according to clinician assessment.

According to the participants themselves, 83% had increases in well-being or life satisfaction at 6 months after treatment.

Sixty-seven percent of participants rated the experience as one of the top 5 meaningful experiences in their lives, and 70% rated the experience as one of their top 5 spiritually significant lifetime events.

“Before beginning the study, it wasn’t clear to me that this treatment would be helpful, since cancer patients may experience profound hopelessness in response to their diagnosis, which is often followed by multiple surgeries and prolonged chemotherapy,” Dr Griffiths said.

“I could imagine that cancer patients would receive psilocybin, look into the existential void, and come out even more fearful. However, the positive changes in attitudes, moods, and behavior that we documented in healthy volunteers were replicated in cancer patients.”

Micrograph showing MDS

Preclinical research has revealed potential therapeutic targets for

myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Investigators

found evidence to suggest that TRAF6, a toll-like receptor effector

with ubiquitin ligase activity, plays a key role in MDS.

So TRAF6 and

proteins regulated by TRAF6 may be therapeutic targets for MDS.

Daniel Starczynowski, PhD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Nature Immunology.

The investigators first found that TRAF6 is overexpressed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from MDS patients.

To more closely examine the role of TRAF6 in MDS, the team created mouse models in which the protein was overexpressed.

“We found that TRAF6 overexpression in mouse hematopoietic stem cells results in impaired blood cell formation and bone marrow failure,” Dr Starczynowski said.

Further investigation revealed that hnRNPA1, an RNA-binding protein and auxiliary splicing factor, is a substrate of TRAF6. And TRAF6 ubiquitination of hnRNPA1 regulates alternative splicing of Arhgap1.

This activates the GTP-binding Rho family protein Cdc42 and accounts for the defects observed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells that express TRAF6.

All of these proteins could be potential treatment targets for cases of MDS triggered by overexpression of TRAF6, according to Dr Starczynowski, who said future studies will test their therapeutic potential in mouse models of MDS.

“Based on our paper, a number of therapeutic approaches can be tested and directed against TRAF6 and other related proteins responsible for MDS,” he said.

Beyond the potential for new therapeutic approaches in MDS, this research revealed a new and critical immune-related function for TRAF6, according to the investigators.

TRAF6 regulates RNA isoform expression in response to various pathogens. In the context of the current study, TRAF6’s regulation of RNA isoform expression is important to the function of hematopoietic cells and reveals another dimension to how cells respond to infection, Dr Starczynowski said.

Micrograph showing MDS

Preclinical research has revealed potential therapeutic targets for

myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Investigators

found evidence to suggest that TRAF6, a toll-like receptor effector

with ubiquitin ligase activity, plays a key role in MDS.

So TRAF6 and

proteins regulated by TRAF6 may be therapeutic targets for MDS.

Daniel Starczynowski, PhD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Nature Immunology.

The investigators first found that TRAF6 is overexpressed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from MDS patients.

To more closely examine the role of TRAF6 in MDS, the team created mouse models in which the protein was overexpressed.

“We found that TRAF6 overexpression in mouse hematopoietic stem cells results in impaired blood cell formation and bone marrow failure,” Dr Starczynowski said.

Further investigation revealed that hnRNPA1, an RNA-binding protein and auxiliary splicing factor, is a substrate of TRAF6. And TRAF6 ubiquitination of hnRNPA1 regulates alternative splicing of Arhgap1.

This activates the GTP-binding Rho family protein Cdc42 and accounts for the defects observed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells that express TRAF6.

All of these proteins could be potential treatment targets for cases of MDS triggered by overexpression of TRAF6, according to Dr Starczynowski, who said future studies will test their therapeutic potential in mouse models of MDS.

“Based on our paper, a number of therapeutic approaches can be tested and directed against TRAF6 and other related proteins responsible for MDS,” he said.

Beyond the potential for new therapeutic approaches in MDS, this research revealed a new and critical immune-related function for TRAF6, according to the investigators.

TRAF6 regulates RNA isoform expression in response to various pathogens. In the context of the current study, TRAF6’s regulation of RNA isoform expression is important to the function of hematopoietic cells and reveals another dimension to how cells respond to infection, Dr Starczynowski said.

Micrograph showing MDS

Preclinical research has revealed potential therapeutic targets for

myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Investigators

found evidence to suggest that TRAF6, a toll-like receptor effector

with ubiquitin ligase activity, plays a key role in MDS.

So TRAF6 and

proteins regulated by TRAF6 may be therapeutic targets for MDS.

Daniel Starczynowski, PhD, of Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Ohio, and his colleagues reported these findings in Nature Immunology.

The investigators first found that TRAF6 is overexpressed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells from MDS patients.

To more closely examine the role of TRAF6 in MDS, the team created mouse models in which the protein was overexpressed.

“We found that TRAF6 overexpression in mouse hematopoietic stem cells results in impaired blood cell formation and bone marrow failure,” Dr Starczynowski said.

Further investigation revealed that hnRNPA1, an RNA-binding protein and auxiliary splicing factor, is a substrate of TRAF6. And TRAF6 ubiquitination of hnRNPA1 regulates alternative splicing of Arhgap1.

This activates the GTP-binding Rho family protein Cdc42 and accounts for the defects observed in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells that express TRAF6.

All of these proteins could be potential treatment targets for cases of MDS triggered by overexpression of TRAF6, according to Dr Starczynowski, who said future studies will test their therapeutic potential in mouse models of MDS.

“Based on our paper, a number of therapeutic approaches can be tested and directed against TRAF6 and other related proteins responsible for MDS,” he said.

Beyond the potential for new therapeutic approaches in MDS, this research revealed a new and critical immune-related function for TRAF6, according to the investigators.

TRAF6 regulates RNA isoform expression in response to various pathogens. In the context of the current study, TRAF6’s regulation of RNA isoform expression is important to the function of hematopoietic cells and reveals another dimension to how cells respond to infection, Dr Starczynowski said.

A unicornuate uterus with a noncommunicating rudimentary horn is a rare mullerian duct anomaly (MDA). It often goes undiagnosed due to the absence of functional endometrium in the anomalous horn. However, when the rudimentary horn is lined with endometrium, obstructed menstrual flow can lead to severe cyclic pelvic pain, development of a pelvic mass, and endometriosis from retrograde menstruation. For these reasons, surgical resection is recommended for patients with this anomaly.

In this video the surgical patient is a 15-year-old adolescent with a 1-year history of progressive dysmenorrhea. Imaging studies revealed a noncommunicating cavitary right uterine horn and confirmed a normal urinary tract system.

We present a stepwise demonstration of our technique for surgical resection of a noncommunicating cavitary uterine horn and conclude that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible route for surgical management of this pathology.

I am pleased to bring you this video to kick off the New Year. We are delighted that our work won "Best Video on Robotic Technology" at the annual AAGL meeting in November 2016, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice.

Vidyard Video

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

A unicornuate uterus with a noncommunicating rudimentary horn is a rare mullerian duct anomaly (MDA). It often goes undiagnosed due to the absence of functional endometrium in the anomalous horn. However, when the rudimentary horn is lined with endometrium, obstructed menstrual flow can lead to severe cyclic pelvic pain, development of a pelvic mass, and endometriosis from retrograde menstruation. For these reasons, surgical resection is recommended for patients with this anomaly.

In this video the surgical patient is a 15-year-old adolescent with a 1-year history of progressive dysmenorrhea. Imaging studies revealed a noncommunicating cavitary right uterine horn and confirmed a normal urinary tract system.

We present a stepwise demonstration of our technique for surgical resection of a noncommunicating cavitary uterine horn and conclude that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible route for surgical management of this pathology.

I am pleased to bring you this video to kick off the New Year. We are delighted that our work won "Best Video on Robotic Technology" at the annual AAGL meeting in November 2016, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice.

Vidyard Video

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

A unicornuate uterus with a noncommunicating rudimentary horn is a rare mullerian duct anomaly (MDA). It often goes undiagnosed due to the absence of functional endometrium in the anomalous horn. However, when the rudimentary horn is lined with endometrium, obstructed menstrual flow can lead to severe cyclic pelvic pain, development of a pelvic mass, and endometriosis from retrograde menstruation. For these reasons, surgical resection is recommended for patients with this anomaly.

In this video the surgical patient is a 15-year-old adolescent with a 1-year history of progressive dysmenorrhea. Imaging studies revealed a noncommunicating cavitary right uterine horn and confirmed a normal urinary tract system.

We present a stepwise demonstration of our technique for surgical resection of a noncommunicating cavitary uterine horn and conclude that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible route for surgical management of this pathology.

I am pleased to bring you this video to kick off the New Year. We are delighted that our work won "Best Video on Robotic Technology" at the annual AAGL meeting in November 2016, and I hope that it is helpful to your practice.

Vidyard Video

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Iraq and Afghanistan veterans (IAV) with epilepsy have more than twice the risk of dying than do those without epilepsy, according to VA researchers.

In the study of 320,583 veterans, 2,187 met the epilepsy criteria. About 5 times more veterans with epilepsy had died by the end of follow-up compared with those without epilepsy. Veterans with epilepsy also are more likely to have mental and physical comorbidities, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, traumatic brain injury, substance use disorder, and hypertension.

Related: Providing Quality Epilepsy Care for Veterans

Before their study, which is the first examining mortality in IAV with epilepsy, the researchers say little information existed about comorbidities and mortality. Epilepsy in veterans usually develops during or after service. People with epilepsy usually are excluded from military service (DoD standards require a 5-year period without seizures or treatment for seizures prior to enlistment). The age-adjusted prevalence of seizure disorder in IAV is 6.1 per 1,000 compared with 7.1 to 10 per 1,000 in the general population.

In response to the higher risk of epilepsy in IAV with traumatic brain injury, the VA established the Epilepsy Centers of Excellence, the researchers note, to increase access to comprehensive multidisciplinary epilepsy specialty care. However, the significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities in this population suggests that “closer integration of primary care, epilepsy specialty care, and mental health care might be needed to reduce excess mortality.”

Related: VA to Reexamine 24,000 Veterans for TBI

The researchers suggest that public health agencies, including the VA, implement evidence-based, chronic disease self-management programs and supports that target physical and psychiatric comorbidity, study long-term outcomes, and ensure links to appropriate clinical and community health care facilities and social service providers.

Iraq and Afghanistan veterans (IAV) with epilepsy have more than twice the risk of dying than do those without epilepsy, according to VA researchers.

In the study of 320,583 veterans, 2,187 met the epilepsy criteria. About 5 times more veterans with epilepsy had died by the end of follow-up compared with those without epilepsy. Veterans with epilepsy also are more likely to have mental and physical comorbidities, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, traumatic brain injury, substance use disorder, and hypertension.

Related: Providing Quality Epilepsy Care for Veterans

Before their study, which is the first examining mortality in IAV with epilepsy, the researchers say little information existed about comorbidities and mortality. Epilepsy in veterans usually develops during or after service. People with epilepsy usually are excluded from military service (DoD standards require a 5-year period without seizures or treatment for seizures prior to enlistment). The age-adjusted prevalence of seizure disorder in IAV is 6.1 per 1,000 compared with 7.1 to 10 per 1,000 in the general population.

In response to the higher risk of epilepsy in IAV with traumatic brain injury, the VA established the Epilepsy Centers of Excellence, the researchers note, to increase access to comprehensive multidisciplinary epilepsy specialty care. However, the significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities in this population suggests that “closer integration of primary care, epilepsy specialty care, and mental health care might be needed to reduce excess mortality.”

Related: VA to Reexamine 24,000 Veterans for TBI

The researchers suggest that public health agencies, including the VA, implement evidence-based, chronic disease self-management programs and supports that target physical and psychiatric comorbidity, study long-term outcomes, and ensure links to appropriate clinical and community health care facilities and social service providers.

Iraq and Afghanistan veterans (IAV) with epilepsy have more than twice the risk of dying than do those without epilepsy, according to VA researchers.

In the study of 320,583 veterans, 2,187 met the epilepsy criteria. About 5 times more veterans with epilepsy had died by the end of follow-up compared with those without epilepsy. Veterans with epilepsy also are more likely to have mental and physical comorbidities, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, traumatic brain injury, substance use disorder, and hypertension.

Related: Providing Quality Epilepsy Care for Veterans

Before their study, which is the first examining mortality in IAV with epilepsy, the researchers say little information existed about comorbidities and mortality. Epilepsy in veterans usually develops during or after service. People with epilepsy usually are excluded from military service (DoD standards require a 5-year period without seizures or treatment for seizures prior to enlistment). The age-adjusted prevalence of seizure disorder in IAV is 6.1 per 1,000 compared with 7.1 to 10 per 1,000 in the general population.

In response to the higher risk of epilepsy in IAV with traumatic brain injury, the VA established the Epilepsy Centers of Excellence, the researchers note, to increase access to comprehensive multidisciplinary epilepsy specialty care. However, the significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities in this population suggests that “closer integration of primary care, epilepsy specialty care, and mental health care might be needed to reduce excess mortality.”

Related: VA to Reexamine 24,000 Veterans for TBI

The researchers suggest that public health agencies, including the VA, implement evidence-based, chronic disease self-management programs and supports that target physical and psychiatric comorbidity, study long-term outcomes, and ensure links to appropriate clinical and community health care facilities and social service providers.

Examining the impact of contraception on acne in adolescents is clinically important because acne affects about 85% of adolescents, and contraceptives may influence the course of acne disease. Estrogen-progestin contraceptives cause a significant improvement in acne.^1,2 By contrast, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and the etonogestrel contraceptive implant may exacerbate acne. In this editorial we review the hormonal contraception−acne relationship, available acne treatments, and appropriate management.

Related article:
Your teenage patient and contraception: Think “long-acting” first

Combination oral contraception and acne

As noted, combination oral contraceptives generally result in acne improvement.^1,2 Estrogen-progestin contraceptives improve the condition through two mechanisms. Primarily, estrogen-progestin contraceptives suppress pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion, thereby de­creasing ovarian testosterone produc­­tion. These contraceptives also increase liver production of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), thereby increasing bound testosterone and decreasing free testosterone. The decrease in ovarian testosterone production and the increase in SHBG-bound testosterone reduce sebum production, resulting in acne improvement.

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved 4 estrogen-progestin contraceptives for acne treatment:

• Estrostep (norethindrone acetate-ethinyl estradiol plus ferrous fumarate)
• Ortho Tri-Cyclen (norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol)
• Yaz (drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol)
• BeYaz (drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol plus levomefolate).

LARC and acne

The levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs), including the levonorgestrel intrauterine systems Mirena, Liletta, Skyla, and Kyleena, and the etonogestrel implant (Nexplanon) are among the most effective contraceptives available for women. Over the last decade there has been a marked increase in the use of LARC. In 2002, 1.3% of women aged 15 to 24 years used an IUD or progestin implant, and this percentage increased to 10% by 2013.³

Progestin-containing LARC may cause acne to worsen. In a large 3-year prospective study of more than 2,900 women using the progestin implant or the copper IUD (ParaGard), use of the progestin implant was associated with a higher rate of reported acne than the copper IUD (18% vs 13%, respectively; relative risk, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.20−1.56; P<.0001).⁴ In a retrospective review of 991 women who used the etonogestrel implant, 24% of the women requested that the implant be removed; the 3 most common reasons for removal were: bleeding disturbances (45%), worsening acne, (12%) and desire to conceive (12%).⁵

Similar differences in reported acne are seen between the LNG-IUD and the copper IUD. In a study of 320 women using the LNG-IUD and the copper IUD, an increase in acne was reported by 17% and 7%, respectively (P<.025).⁶ In a small prospective study of the LNG-IUD versus the copper IUD over the first 12 months of use, use of the LNG-IUD was associated with a statistically significant worsening of acne scores while use of the copper IUD had no impact on acne scores.⁷

Related article:
Overcoming LARC complications: 7 case challenges

In a study of 2,147 consecutive women using a hormonal contraceptive who presented to a dermatologist for the treatment of acne, patients were asked to assess how the contraceptive affected their acne. By type of contraceptive, the percent of women who reported that the contraceptive made their acne worse was: LNG-IUD, 36%; progestin implant, 33%; depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 27%; levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive, 10%; norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol (EE), 6%; etonogestrel-EE vaginal ring, 4%; drospirenone-EE, 3%; and desogestrel-EE, 2%. The percent of women who reported that the contraceptive significantly improved their acne was: drospirenone-EE, 26%; norgestimate-EE, 17%; desogestrel-EE, 15%; etonogestrel-EE vaginal ring, 14%; norethindrone-EE, 8%; levonorgestrel-EE, 6%; depot MPA, 5%; LNG-IUD, 3%; and progestin implant, 1%.⁸

In adolescents with acne, switching from an estrogen-progestin contraceptive to a LNG-IUD or an etonogestrel implant may cause the patient to report that her acne has worsened. As mentioned, combination estrogen-progestin contraceptives reduce free testosterone, thereby improving acne. When an estrogen-progestin contraceptive is discontinued, free testosterone levels will increase. If a LARC method is initiated and the patient’s acne worsens, the patient may attribute this change to the LARC. For clinicians planning on switching a patient from an estrogen-progestin contraceptive to a LNG-IUD or etonogestrel implant, evaluation of current acne symptoms and acne history may be particularly important.

Acne treatment

Acne is caused by follicular hyperproliferation and abnormal desquamation, excess sebum production, proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes, and inflammation.

First-line agents. An expert guideline developed under the auspices of the American Academy of Dermatology recommends that topical agents including retinoids and antimicrobials be first-line treatments for acne.^9,10

Topical retinoids are the primary component of topical acne treatment and can be used as monotherapy or in combination with topical antimicrobials (TABLE 1). Three topical retinoids are approved for use in the United States: tretinoin, adapalene, and tazarotene. Adapalene is available by prescription, 0.1% and 0.3% gel, and over the counter, 0.1% gel (Differin Gel) (TABLE 2). The topical retinoids are applied once daily at bedtime and can cause local skin irritation and dryness. Pregnant women should not be treated with topical retinoids.

Topical antimicrobials for the treatment of acne include: benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, azelaic acid, and dapsone. Clindamycin is only recommended for use in combination with benzoyl peroxide in order to reduce the development of bacterial resistance to the antibiotic.

Related article:
Does the risk of unplanned pregnancy outweigh the risk of VTE from hormonal contraception?

Approach to mild, moderate, and severe acne. In adolescents with mild acne a topical retinoid or benzoyl peroxide can be used as monotherapy or used together. Referral to a dermatologist is recommended for moderate to severe acne. Moderate acne is treated with combination topical therapy (benzoyl peroxide plus a topical retinoid, a topical antibiotic, or both). Severe acne is treated with 3 months of oral antibiotics plus topical combination therapy (benzoyl peroxide plus a topical retinoid, a topical antibiotic, or both). In cases of severe nodular acne or acne that produces scarring the patient may require oral isotretinoin treatment.

Acne management for adolescents seeking LARC

Given the data that the LNG-IUD and the etonogestrel implant may worsen acne, it may be wise to preemptively ensure that adolescents with acne who are initiating these contraceptives are also being adequately treated for their acne. Gynecologists should provide anticipatory guidance for adolescents with mild acne who initiate progestin-based LARC. Topical benzoyl peroxide is available over-the-counter and can be recommended to these patients. Follow-up in clinic a few months after initiation also may be helpful to assess side effects.

In moderate and severe cases, coordination with dermatology is recommended. For these patients, gynecologists could consider prescribing a topical retinoid or antibiotic medication in conjunction with a new progestin-based LARC method. Those with severe acne also may benefit from concurrent use of oral contraceptives. In adolescents who do not tolerate progestin-based LARC, the copper IUD is a highly effective alternative and can be paired with estrogen-progestin contraception for acne treatment.

Related article:
With no budge in more than 20 years, are US unintended pregnancy rates finally on the decline?

Acne is but one consideration for contraceptive choice

With the above methods, acne can be managed in adolescents seeking a LNG-IUD or implant and should not be considered a contraindication or reason to avoid progestin-based LARC. Adolescents are more likely to continue LARC than estrogen-progestin contraceptives and LARC methods are associated with substantially lower pregnancy rates in this patient population.¹¹ LARC is recommended as first-line contraception for adolescents by both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.^12,13

In choosing contraception with your adolescent patient, the risk of unintended pregnancy should be weighed against the risk of acne and other potential side effects. Do not select a contraceptive based on the presence or absence of acne disease. However, be aware that contraceptives can either improve or worsen acne. Patients with mild and moderate acne disease should be considered for treatment with topical retinoids and/or antimicrobial agents.

Dr. Barbieri reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Dr. Roe reports receiving grant or research support from the Society of Family Planning.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Examining the impact of contraception on acne in adolescents is clinically important because acne affects about 85% of adolescents, and contraceptives may influence the course of acne disease. Estrogen-progestin contraceptives cause a significant improvement in acne.^1,2 By contrast, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and the etonogestrel contraceptive implant may exacerbate acne. In this editorial we review the hormonal contraception−acne relationship, available acne treatments, and appropriate management.

Related article:
Your teenage patient and contraception: Think “long-acting” first

Combination oral contraception and acne

As noted, combination oral contraceptives generally result in acne improvement.^1,2 Estrogen-progestin contraceptives improve the condition through two mechanisms. Primarily, estrogen-progestin contraceptives suppress pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion, thereby de­creasing ovarian testosterone produc­­tion. These contraceptives also increase liver production of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), thereby increasing bound testosterone and decreasing free testosterone. The decrease in ovarian testosterone production and the increase in SHBG-bound testosterone reduce sebum production, resulting in acne improvement.

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved 4 estrogen-progestin contraceptives for acne treatment:

• Estrostep (norethindrone acetate-ethinyl estradiol plus ferrous fumarate)
• Ortho Tri-Cyclen (norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol)
• Yaz (drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol)
• BeYaz (drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol plus levomefolate).

LARC and acne

The levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs), including the levonorgestrel intrauterine systems Mirena, Liletta, Skyla, and Kyleena, and the etonogestrel implant (Nexplanon) are among the most effective contraceptives available for women. Over the last decade there has been a marked increase in the use of LARC. In 2002, 1.3% of women aged 15 to 24 years used an IUD or progestin implant, and this percentage increased to 10% by 2013.³

Progestin-containing LARC may cause acne to worsen. In a large 3-year prospective study of more than 2,900 women using the progestin implant or the copper IUD (ParaGard), use of the progestin implant was associated with a higher rate of reported acne than the copper IUD (18% vs 13%, respectively; relative risk, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.20−1.56; P<.0001).⁴ In a retrospective review of 991 women who used the etonogestrel implant, 24% of the women requested that the implant be removed; the 3 most common reasons for removal were: bleeding disturbances (45%), worsening acne, (12%) and desire to conceive (12%).⁵

Similar differences in reported acne are seen between the LNG-IUD and the copper IUD. In a study of 320 women using the LNG-IUD and the copper IUD, an increase in acne was reported by 17% and 7%, respectively (P<.025).⁶ In a small prospective study of the LNG-IUD versus the copper IUD over the first 12 months of use, use of the LNG-IUD was associated with a statistically significant worsening of acne scores while use of the copper IUD had no impact on acne scores.⁷

Related article:
Overcoming LARC complications: 7 case challenges

In a study of 2,147 consecutive women using a hormonal contraceptive who presented to a dermatologist for the treatment of acne, patients were asked to assess how the contraceptive affected their acne. By type of contraceptive, the percent of women who reported that the contraceptive made their acne worse was: LNG-IUD, 36%; progestin implant, 33%; depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 27%; levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive, 10%; norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol (EE), 6%; etonogestrel-EE vaginal ring, 4%; drospirenone-EE, 3%; and desogestrel-EE, 2%. The percent of women who reported that the contraceptive significantly improved their acne was: drospirenone-EE, 26%; norgestimate-EE, 17%; desogestrel-EE, 15%; etonogestrel-EE vaginal ring, 14%; norethindrone-EE, 8%; levonorgestrel-EE, 6%; depot MPA, 5%; LNG-IUD, 3%; and progestin implant, 1%.⁸

In adolescents with acne, switching from an estrogen-progestin contraceptive to a LNG-IUD or an etonogestrel implant may cause the patient to report that her acne has worsened. As mentioned, combination estrogen-progestin contraceptives reduce free testosterone, thereby improving acne. When an estrogen-progestin contraceptive is discontinued, free testosterone levels will increase. If a LARC method is initiated and the patient’s acne worsens, the patient may attribute this change to the LARC. For clinicians planning on switching a patient from an estrogen-progestin contraceptive to a LNG-IUD or etonogestrel implant, evaluation of current acne symptoms and acne history may be particularly important.

Acne treatment

Acne is caused by follicular hyperproliferation and abnormal desquamation, excess sebum production, proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes, and inflammation.

First-line agents. An expert guideline developed under the auspices of the American Academy of Dermatology recommends that topical agents including retinoids and antimicrobials be first-line treatments for acne.^9,10

Topical retinoids are the primary component of topical acne treatment and can be used as monotherapy or in combination with topical antimicrobials (TABLE 1). Three topical retinoids are approved for use in the United States: tretinoin, adapalene, and tazarotene. Adapalene is available by prescription, 0.1% and 0.3% gel, and over the counter, 0.1% gel (Differin Gel) (TABLE 2). The topical retinoids are applied once daily at bedtime and can cause local skin irritation and dryness. Pregnant women should not be treated with topical retinoids.

Topical antimicrobials for the treatment of acne include: benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, azelaic acid, and dapsone. Clindamycin is only recommended for use in combination with benzoyl peroxide in order to reduce the development of bacterial resistance to the antibiotic.

Related article:
Does the risk of unplanned pregnancy outweigh the risk of VTE from hormonal contraception?

Approach to mild, moderate, and severe acne. In adolescents with mild acne a topical retinoid or benzoyl peroxide can be used as monotherapy or used together. Referral to a dermatologist is recommended for moderate to severe acne. Moderate acne is treated with combination topical therapy (benzoyl peroxide plus a topical retinoid, a topical antibiotic, or both). Severe acne is treated with 3 months of oral antibiotics plus topical combination therapy (benzoyl peroxide plus a topical retinoid, a topical antibiotic, or both). In cases of severe nodular acne or acne that produces scarring the patient may require oral isotretinoin treatment.

Acne management for adolescents seeking LARC

Given the data that the LNG-IUD and the etonogestrel implant may worsen acne, it may be wise to preemptively ensure that adolescents with acne who are initiating these contraceptives are also being adequately treated for their acne. Gynecologists should provide anticipatory guidance for adolescents with mild acne who initiate progestin-based LARC. Topical benzoyl peroxide is available over-the-counter and can be recommended to these patients. Follow-up in clinic a few months after initiation also may be helpful to assess side effects.

In moderate and severe cases, coordination with dermatology is recommended. For these patients, gynecologists could consider prescribing a topical retinoid or antibiotic medication in conjunction with a new progestin-based LARC method. Those with severe acne also may benefit from concurrent use of oral contraceptives. In adolescents who do not tolerate progestin-based LARC, the copper IUD is a highly effective alternative and can be paired with estrogen-progestin contraception for acne treatment.

Related article:
With no budge in more than 20 years, are US unintended pregnancy rates finally on the decline?

Acne is but one consideration for contraceptive choice

With the above methods, acne can be managed in adolescents seeking a LNG-IUD or implant and should not be considered a contraindication or reason to avoid progestin-based LARC. Adolescents are more likely to continue LARC than estrogen-progestin contraceptives and LARC methods are associated with substantially lower pregnancy rates in this patient population.¹¹ LARC is recommended as first-line contraception for adolescents by both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.^12,13

In choosing contraception with your adolescent patient, the risk of unintended pregnancy should be weighed against the risk of acne and other potential side effects. Do not select a contraceptive based on the presence or absence of acne disease. However, be aware that contraceptives can either improve or worsen acne. Patients with mild and moderate acne disease should be considered for treatment with topical retinoids and/or antimicrobial agents.

Dr. Barbieri reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Dr. Roe reports receiving grant or research support from the Society of Family Planning.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Examining the impact of contraception on acne in adolescents is clinically important because acne affects about 85% of adolescents, and contraceptives may influence the course of acne disease. Estrogen-progestin contraceptives cause a significant improvement in acne.^1,2 By contrast, the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and the etonogestrel contraceptive implant may exacerbate acne. In this editorial we review the hormonal contraception−acne relationship, available acne treatments, and appropriate management.

Related article:
Your teenage patient and contraception: Think “long-acting” first

Combination oral contraception and acne

As noted, combination oral contraceptives generally result in acne improvement.^1,2 Estrogen-progestin contraceptives improve the condition through two mechanisms. Primarily, estrogen-progestin contraceptives suppress pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion, thereby de­creasing ovarian testosterone produc­­tion. These contraceptives also increase liver production of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), thereby increasing bound testosterone and decreasing free testosterone. The decrease in ovarian testosterone production and the increase in SHBG-bound testosterone reduce sebum production, resulting in acne improvement.

The US Food and Drug Administration has approved 4 estrogen-progestin contraceptives for acne treatment:

• Estrostep (norethindrone acetate-ethinyl estradiol plus ferrous fumarate)
• Ortho Tri-Cyclen (norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol)
• Yaz (drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol)
• BeYaz (drospirenone-ethinyl estradiol plus levomefolate).

LARC and acne

The levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUDs), including the levonorgestrel intrauterine systems Mirena, Liletta, Skyla, and Kyleena, and the etonogestrel implant (Nexplanon) are among the most effective contraceptives available for women. Over the last decade there has been a marked increase in the use of LARC. In 2002, 1.3% of women aged 15 to 24 years used an IUD or progestin implant, and this percentage increased to 10% by 2013.³

Progestin-containing LARC may cause acne to worsen. In a large 3-year prospective study of more than 2,900 women using the progestin implant or the copper IUD (ParaGard), use of the progestin implant was associated with a higher rate of reported acne than the copper IUD (18% vs 13%, respectively; relative risk, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.20−1.56; P<.0001).⁴ In a retrospective review of 991 women who used the etonogestrel implant, 24% of the women requested that the implant be removed; the 3 most common reasons for removal were: bleeding disturbances (45%), worsening acne, (12%) and desire to conceive (12%).⁵

Similar differences in reported acne are seen between the LNG-IUD and the copper IUD. In a study of 320 women using the LNG-IUD and the copper IUD, an increase in acne was reported by 17% and 7%, respectively (P<.025).⁶ In a small prospective study of the LNG-IUD versus the copper IUD over the first 12 months of use, use of the LNG-IUD was associated with a statistically significant worsening of acne scores while use of the copper IUD had no impact on acne scores.⁷

Related article:
Overcoming LARC complications: 7 case challenges

In a study of 2,147 consecutive women using a hormonal contraceptive who presented to a dermatologist for the treatment of acne, patients were asked to assess how the contraceptive affected their acne. By type of contraceptive, the percent of women who reported that the contraceptive made their acne worse was: LNG-IUD, 36%; progestin implant, 33%; depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), 27%; levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive, 10%; norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol (EE), 6%; etonogestrel-EE vaginal ring, 4%; drospirenone-EE, 3%; and desogestrel-EE, 2%. The percent of women who reported that the contraceptive significantly improved their acne was: drospirenone-EE, 26%; norgestimate-EE, 17%; desogestrel-EE, 15%; etonogestrel-EE vaginal ring, 14%; norethindrone-EE, 8%; levonorgestrel-EE, 6%; depot MPA, 5%; LNG-IUD, 3%; and progestin implant, 1%.⁸

In adolescents with acne, switching from an estrogen-progestin contraceptive to a LNG-IUD or an etonogestrel implant may cause the patient to report that her acne has worsened. As mentioned, combination estrogen-progestin contraceptives reduce free testosterone, thereby improving acne. When an estrogen-progestin contraceptive is discontinued, free testosterone levels will increase. If a LARC method is initiated and the patient’s acne worsens, the patient may attribute this change to the LARC. For clinicians planning on switching a patient from an estrogen-progestin contraceptive to a LNG-IUD or etonogestrel implant, evaluation of current acne symptoms and acne history may be particularly important.

Acne treatment

Acne is caused by follicular hyperproliferation and abnormal desquamation, excess sebum production, proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes, and inflammation.

First-line agents. An expert guideline developed under the auspices of the American Academy of Dermatology recommends that topical agents including retinoids and antimicrobials be first-line treatments for acne.^9,10

Topical retinoids are the primary component of topical acne treatment and can be used as monotherapy or in combination with topical antimicrobials (TABLE 1). Three topical retinoids are approved for use in the United States: tretinoin, adapalene, and tazarotene. Adapalene is available by prescription, 0.1% and 0.3% gel, and over the counter, 0.1% gel (Differin Gel) (TABLE 2). The topical retinoids are applied once daily at bedtime and can cause local skin irritation and dryness. Pregnant women should not be treated with topical retinoids.

Topical antimicrobials for the treatment of acne include: benzoyl peroxide, clindamycin, azelaic acid, and dapsone. Clindamycin is only recommended for use in combination with benzoyl peroxide in order to reduce the development of bacterial resistance to the antibiotic.

Related article:
Does the risk of unplanned pregnancy outweigh the risk of VTE from hormonal contraception?

Approach to mild, moderate, and severe acne. In adolescents with mild acne a topical retinoid or benzoyl peroxide can be used as monotherapy or used together. Referral to a dermatologist is recommended for moderate to severe acne. Moderate acne is treated with combination topical therapy (benzoyl peroxide plus a topical retinoid, a topical antibiotic, or both). Severe acne is treated with 3 months of oral antibiotics plus topical combination therapy (benzoyl peroxide plus a topical retinoid, a topical antibiotic, or both). In cases of severe nodular acne or acne that produces scarring the patient may require oral isotretinoin treatment.

Acne management for adolescents seeking LARC

Given the data that the LNG-IUD and the etonogestrel implant may worsen acne, it may be wise to preemptively ensure that adolescents with acne who are initiating these contraceptives are also being adequately treated for their acne. Gynecologists should provide anticipatory guidance for adolescents with mild acne who initiate progestin-based LARC. Topical benzoyl peroxide is available over-the-counter and can be recommended to these patients. Follow-up in clinic a few months after initiation also may be helpful to assess side effects.

In moderate and severe cases, coordination with dermatology is recommended. For these patients, gynecologists could consider prescribing a topical retinoid or antibiotic medication in conjunction with a new progestin-based LARC method. Those with severe acne also may benefit from concurrent use of oral contraceptives. In adolescents who do not tolerate progestin-based LARC, the copper IUD is a highly effective alternative and can be paired with estrogen-progestin contraception for acne treatment.

Related article:
With no budge in more than 20 years, are US unintended pregnancy rates finally on the decline?

Acne is but one consideration for contraceptive choice

With the above methods, acne can be managed in adolescents seeking a LNG-IUD or implant and should not be considered a contraindication or reason to avoid progestin-based LARC. Adolescents are more likely to continue LARC than estrogen-progestin contraceptives and LARC methods are associated with substantially lower pregnancy rates in this patient population.¹¹ LARC is recommended as first-line contraception for adolescents by both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.^12,13

In choosing contraception with your adolescent patient, the risk of unintended pregnancy should be weighed against the risk of acne and other potential side effects. Do not select a contraceptive based on the presence or absence of acne disease. However, be aware that contraceptives can either improve or worsen acne. Patients with mild and moderate acne disease should be considered for treatment with topical retinoids and/or antimicrobial agents.

Dr. Barbieri reports no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Dr. Roe reports receiving grant or research support from the Society of Family Planning.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Afatinib, axitinib, and belinostat head the list of 34 additions to the updated National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. The list is “an important resource as well as a tool to raise awareness among workers about the hazards of some drugs,” said NIOSH Director John Howard, MD, “enabling workers to take the necessary steps to protect themselves from exposure while doing their job.”

The list includes drugs used for cancer chemotherapy, antiviral drugs, hormones, and bioengineered drugs. The 3 main categories are antineoplastic drugs (including those with manufacturer’s safe-handling guidance [MSHG]), nonantineoplastic drugs that meet ≥ 1 of the NIOSH criteria for hazardous drugs (including those with MSHG), and nonantineoplastic drugs that primarily have adverse reproductive effects.

NIOSH estimates that 8 million U.S. health care workers are potentially exposed to hazardous drugs in the workplace. Some drugs defined as hazardous may not pose a significant risk of direct occupational exposure until the formulations are altered (as when coated tablets are crushed). Other hazards include, for example, skin contact with or inhalation of dust as uncoated tablets are counted. Five of the newly added drugs have safe-handling recommendations.

NIOSH says “no single approach can cover the diverse potential occupational exposures to the drugs” and notes that safe-handling precautions can vary with the activity and formulation of the drug. Still, the list also provides general guidance for “possible scenarios” that might be encountered in health care settings where hazardous drugs are handled. It addresses situations such as receiving, unpacking, and placing drugs in storage; administering an intact tablet or capsule from a unit-dose package; cutting, crushing, or manipulating tablets or capsules; and compounding oral liquid drugs or topical drugs.

The new report also provides health care organizations with guidance on generating their own list of hazardous drugs. Hazardous drug evaluation is “a continual process,” NIOSH says, advising that every facility must assess each new drug that enters its workplace and when appropriate reassess its list of hazardous drugs as new toxicologic data become available.

The list of hazardous drugs is updated periodically at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hazdrug/.

Afatinib, axitinib, and belinostat head the list of 34 additions to the updated National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. The list is “an important resource as well as a tool to raise awareness among workers about the hazards of some drugs,” said NIOSH Director John Howard, MD, “enabling workers to take the necessary steps to protect themselves from exposure while doing their job.”

The list includes drugs used for cancer chemotherapy, antiviral drugs, hormones, and bioengineered drugs. The 3 main categories are antineoplastic drugs (including those with manufacturer’s safe-handling guidance [MSHG]), nonantineoplastic drugs that meet ≥ 1 of the NIOSH criteria for hazardous drugs (including those with MSHG), and nonantineoplastic drugs that primarily have adverse reproductive effects.

NIOSH estimates that 8 million U.S. health care workers are potentially exposed to hazardous drugs in the workplace. Some drugs defined as hazardous may not pose a significant risk of direct occupational exposure until the formulations are altered (as when coated tablets are crushed). Other hazards include, for example, skin contact with or inhalation of dust as uncoated tablets are counted. Five of the newly added drugs have safe-handling recommendations.

NIOSH says “no single approach can cover the diverse potential occupational exposures to the drugs” and notes that safe-handling precautions can vary with the activity and formulation of the drug. Still, the list also provides general guidance for “possible scenarios” that might be encountered in health care settings where hazardous drugs are handled. It addresses situations such as receiving, unpacking, and placing drugs in storage; administering an intact tablet or capsule from a unit-dose package; cutting, crushing, or manipulating tablets or capsules; and compounding oral liquid drugs or topical drugs.

The new report also provides health care organizations with guidance on generating their own list of hazardous drugs. Hazardous drug evaluation is “a continual process,” NIOSH says, advising that every facility must assess each new drug that enters its workplace and when appropriate reassess its list of hazardous drugs as new toxicologic data become available.

The list of hazardous drugs is updated periodically at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hazdrug/.

Afatinib, axitinib, and belinostat head the list of 34 additions to the updated National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) List of Antineoplastic and Other Hazardous Drugs in Healthcare Settings. The list is “an important resource as well as a tool to raise awareness among workers about the hazards of some drugs,” said NIOSH Director John Howard, MD, “enabling workers to take the necessary steps to protect themselves from exposure while doing their job.”

The list includes drugs used for cancer chemotherapy, antiviral drugs, hormones, and bioengineered drugs. The 3 main categories are antineoplastic drugs (including those with manufacturer’s safe-handling guidance [MSHG]), nonantineoplastic drugs that meet ≥ 1 of the NIOSH criteria for hazardous drugs (including those with MSHG), and nonantineoplastic drugs that primarily have adverse reproductive effects.

NIOSH estimates that 8 million U.S. health care workers are potentially exposed to hazardous drugs in the workplace. Some drugs defined as hazardous may not pose a significant risk of direct occupational exposure until the formulations are altered (as when coated tablets are crushed). Other hazards include, for example, skin contact with or inhalation of dust as uncoated tablets are counted. Five of the newly added drugs have safe-handling recommendations.

NIOSH says “no single approach can cover the diverse potential occupational exposures to the drugs” and notes that safe-handling precautions can vary with the activity and formulation of the drug. Still, the list also provides general guidance for “possible scenarios” that might be encountered in health care settings where hazardous drugs are handled. It addresses situations such as receiving, unpacking, and placing drugs in storage; administering an intact tablet or capsule from a unit-dose package; cutting, crushing, or manipulating tablets or capsules; and compounding oral liquid drugs or topical drugs.

The new report also provides health care organizations with guidance on generating their own list of hazardous drugs. Hazardous drug evaluation is “a continual process,” NIOSH says, advising that every facility must assess each new drug that enters its workplace and when appropriate reassess its list of hazardous drugs as new toxicologic data become available.

The list of hazardous drugs is updated periodically at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/hazdrug/.