Photo by Bill Branson

WASHINGTON, DC—In a head-to-head study comparing a single-dose oral antiemetic to a 3-day oral regimen, the single dose has shown itself to be non-inferior to the multi-day regimen in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

The investigators evaluated netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) against aprepitant/granisetron (APR/GRAN) in patients on highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

They found the data suggest “that NEPA, in a single dose, had equivalent efficacy to a 3-day oral aprepitant/granisetron regimen,” according to the lead investigator and abstract presenter.

Li Zhang, MD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented the data at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Congress (abstract PS049, pp S55 – S56).

NEPA is a combination of the selective NK₁RA netupitant (300 mg) and the clinically and pharmacologically active 5-HT₃RA, palonosetron (0.5 mg) for the prevention of CINV.

Oral palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase of treatment.

Netupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.

It is formulated into a single oral capsule.

Study design

The study was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study conducted in 828 chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) agents.

Patients received a single oral dose of NEPA on day 1 or a 3-day oral APR/GRAN regimen (days 1-3).

All patients received oral dexamethasone on days 1-4.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis or rescue medication needed during the overall (0-120 hour) phase.

The investigators defined non-inferiority to be the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than the non-inferiority margin set at  ̶ 10%.

Secondary endpoints included no emesis, no rescue medication, and no significant nausea (NSN), defined as <25 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The baseline demographics were comparable between the NEPA (n=413) and APR/GRAN (n=416) arms: 71% of the patients were male, a mean age of 55 years, and a little more than half were ECOG performance status 1.

The most common cancer types were lung and head and neck cancer.

Patients had received a median cisplatin dose of 73 and 72 mg/m² in the NEPA and APR/GRAN arms, respectively.

Within the first 24 hours (acute phase), NEPA was non-inferior to APR/GRAN. NEPA had a CR rate of 84.5% and APR/GRAN had a CR rate of 87.0%. The risk difference between the 2 agents was -2.5% (range, -7.2%, 2.3%).

In the delayed phase (25-120 hours), NEPA had a CR rate of 77.9% and APR/GRAN, 74.3%. The risk difference was 3.7% (range, -2.1%, 9.5%).

Overall, for both phases, the CR rate was 73.8% for NEPA and 72.4% for APR/GRAN. The risk difference was 1.5% (range, -4.5%, 7.5%).

Dr Zhang pointed out that although the overall CR rates were similar, the daily rates of patients experiencing CINV remained in the range of 13% - 15% for patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

However, daily rates of CINV for patients receiving NEPA declined from 16% to 8% over the 5 days. The investigators believe this suggests a benefit for delayed CINV.

Regarding secondary endpoints, significantly more patients receiving NEPA did not require rescue medication in the delayed phase and overall than patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between the arms—58.1% in the NEPA arm and 57.5% in the APR/GRAN arm, as were serious TEAS, at 4.5% and 4.6% for NEPA and APR/GRAN, respectively. And the no emesis and no significant nausea rates favored NEPA.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 2% or more of the patients in both arms were constipation and hiccups.

Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in each arm, 1 leading to discontinuation in the NEPA arm.

The investigators concluded that NEPA, as a convenient capsule administered once per cycle, is at least as effective as the 3-day regimen of APR/GRAN in patients receiving HEC.

NEPA (Akynzeo®) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and marketed globally by Helsinn, Lugano, Switzerland, the sponsor of the trial.

For the full US prescribing information, see the package insert.

Photo by Bill Branson

WASHINGTON, DC—In a head-to-head study comparing a single-dose oral antiemetic to a 3-day oral regimen, the single dose has shown itself to be non-inferior to the multi-day regimen in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

The investigators evaluated netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) against aprepitant/granisetron (APR/GRAN) in patients on highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

They found the data suggest “that NEPA, in a single dose, had equivalent efficacy to a 3-day oral aprepitant/granisetron regimen,” according to the lead investigator and abstract presenter.

Li Zhang, MD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented the data at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Congress (abstract PS049, pp S55 – S56).

NEPA is a combination of the selective NK₁RA netupitant (300 mg) and the clinically and pharmacologically active 5-HT₃RA, palonosetron (0.5 mg) for the prevention of CINV.

Oral palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase of treatment.

Netupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.

It is formulated into a single oral capsule.

Study design

The study was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study conducted in 828 chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) agents.

Patients received a single oral dose of NEPA on day 1 or a 3-day oral APR/GRAN regimen (days 1-3).

All patients received oral dexamethasone on days 1-4.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis or rescue medication needed during the overall (0-120 hour) phase.

The investigators defined non-inferiority to be the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than the non-inferiority margin set at  ̶ 10%.

Secondary endpoints included no emesis, no rescue medication, and no significant nausea (NSN), defined as <25 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The baseline demographics were comparable between the NEPA (n=413) and APR/GRAN (n=416) arms: 71% of the patients were male, a mean age of 55 years, and a little more than half were ECOG performance status 1.

The most common cancer types were lung and head and neck cancer.

Patients had received a median cisplatin dose of 73 and 72 mg/m² in the NEPA and APR/GRAN arms, respectively.

Within the first 24 hours (acute phase), NEPA was non-inferior to APR/GRAN. NEPA had a CR rate of 84.5% and APR/GRAN had a CR rate of 87.0%. The risk difference between the 2 agents was -2.5% (range, -7.2%, 2.3%).

In the delayed phase (25-120 hours), NEPA had a CR rate of 77.9% and APR/GRAN, 74.3%. The risk difference was 3.7% (range, -2.1%, 9.5%).

Overall, for both phases, the CR rate was 73.8% for NEPA and 72.4% for APR/GRAN. The risk difference was 1.5% (range, -4.5%, 7.5%).

Dr Zhang pointed out that although the overall CR rates were similar, the daily rates of patients experiencing CINV remained in the range of 13% - 15% for patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

However, daily rates of CINV for patients receiving NEPA declined from 16% to 8% over the 5 days. The investigators believe this suggests a benefit for delayed CINV.

Regarding secondary endpoints, significantly more patients receiving NEPA did not require rescue medication in the delayed phase and overall than patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between the arms—58.1% in the NEPA arm and 57.5% in the APR/GRAN arm, as were serious TEAS, at 4.5% and 4.6% for NEPA and APR/GRAN, respectively. And the no emesis and no significant nausea rates favored NEPA.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 2% or more of the patients in both arms were constipation and hiccups.

Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in each arm, 1 leading to discontinuation in the NEPA arm.

The investigators concluded that NEPA, as a convenient capsule administered once per cycle, is at least as effective as the 3-day regimen of APR/GRAN in patients receiving HEC.

NEPA (Akynzeo®) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and marketed globally by Helsinn, Lugano, Switzerland, the sponsor of the trial.

For the full US prescribing information, see the package insert.

Photo by Bill Branson

WASHINGTON, DC—In a head-to-head study comparing a single-dose oral antiemetic to a 3-day oral regimen, the single dose has shown itself to be non-inferior to the multi-day regimen in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

The investigators evaluated netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) against aprepitant/granisetron (APR/GRAN) in patients on highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

They found the data suggest “that NEPA, in a single dose, had equivalent efficacy to a 3-day oral aprepitant/granisetron regimen,” according to the lead investigator and abstract presenter.

Li Zhang, MD, of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center in Guangzhou, China, presented the data at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) Congress (abstract PS049, pp S55 – S56).

NEPA is a combination of the selective NK₁RA netupitant (300 mg) and the clinically and pharmacologically active 5-HT₃RA, palonosetron (0.5 mg) for the prevention of CINV.

Oral palonosetron prevents nausea and vomiting during the acute phase of treatment.

Netupitant prevents nausea and vomiting during both the acute and delayed phase after cancer chemotherapy.

It is formulated into a single oral capsule.

Study design

The study was a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study conducted in 828 chemotherapy-naïve Asian patients receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) agents.

Patients received a single oral dose of NEPA on day 1 or a 3-day oral APR/GRAN regimen (days 1-3).

All patients received oral dexamethasone on days 1-4.

The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis or rescue medication needed during the overall (0-120 hour) phase.

The investigators defined non-inferiority to be the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval greater than the non-inferiority margin set at  ̶ 10%.

Secondary endpoints included no emesis, no rescue medication, and no significant nausea (NSN), defined as <25 mm on 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

The baseline demographics were comparable between the NEPA (n=413) and APR/GRAN (n=416) arms: 71% of the patients were male, a mean age of 55 years, and a little more than half were ECOG performance status 1.

The most common cancer types were lung and head and neck cancer.

Patients had received a median cisplatin dose of 73 and 72 mg/m² in the NEPA and APR/GRAN arms, respectively.

Within the first 24 hours (acute phase), NEPA was non-inferior to APR/GRAN. NEPA had a CR rate of 84.5% and APR/GRAN had a CR rate of 87.0%. The risk difference between the 2 agents was -2.5% (range, -7.2%, 2.3%).

In the delayed phase (25-120 hours), NEPA had a CR rate of 77.9% and APR/GRAN, 74.3%. The risk difference was 3.7% (range, -2.1%, 9.5%).

Overall, for both phases, the CR rate was 73.8% for NEPA and 72.4% for APR/GRAN. The risk difference was 1.5% (range, -4.5%, 7.5%).

Dr Zhang pointed out that although the overall CR rates were similar, the daily rates of patients experiencing CINV remained in the range of 13% - 15% for patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

However, daily rates of CINV for patients receiving NEPA declined from 16% to 8% over the 5 days. The investigators believe this suggests a benefit for delayed CINV.

Regarding secondary endpoints, significantly more patients receiving NEPA did not require rescue medication in the delayed phase and overall than patients in the APR/GRAN arm.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between the arms—58.1% in the NEPA arm and 57.5% in the APR/GRAN arm, as were serious TEAS, at 4.5% and 4.6% for NEPA and APR/GRAN, respectively. And the no emesis and no significant nausea rates favored NEPA.

The most common treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in 2% or more of the patients in both arms were constipation and hiccups.

Two serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in each arm, 1 leading to discontinuation in the NEPA arm.

The investigators concluded that NEPA, as a convenient capsule administered once per cycle, is at least as effective as the 3-day regimen of APR/GRAN in patients receiving HEC.

NEPA (Akynzeo®) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and marketed globally by Helsinn, Lugano, Switzerland, the sponsor of the trial.

For the full US prescribing information, see the package insert.

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for rivaroxaban (XARELTO®).

The sNDA is for a 10 mg once-daily dose of rivaroxaban to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have received at least 6 months of standard anticoagulant therapy.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the rivaroxaban sNDA by October 28, 2017.

The sNDA is supported by data from the EINSTEIN CHOICE study. Patients enrolled in this study had confirmed VTE and were treated initially with standard anticoagulant therapy for 6 to 12 months.

During EINSTEIN CHOICE, 3365 patients received rivaroxaban at 10 mg, rivaroxaban at 20 mg, or aspirin at 100 mg once daily for up to 12 months of extended treatment.

Both rivaroxaban doses were superior to aspirin in preventing fatal or non-fatal recurrent VTE, the study’s primary efficacy endpoint.

The rate of recurrent VTE was 1.2% in the 10 mg rivaroxaban arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001), 1.5% in the 20 mg rivaroxaban arm (HR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P<0.001), and 4.4% in the aspirin arm. Fatal VTE occurred in 0%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of patients, respectively.

The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% for the 10 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=1.64; 95% CI, 0.39 to 6.84; P=0.50), 0.5% for the 20 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=2.01; 95% CI, 0.50 to 8.04; P=0.32), and 0.3% for the aspirin group.

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for rivaroxaban (XARELTO®).

The sNDA is for a 10 mg once-daily dose of rivaroxaban to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have received at least 6 months of standard anticoagulant therapy.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the rivaroxaban sNDA by October 28, 2017.

The sNDA is supported by data from the EINSTEIN CHOICE study. Patients enrolled in this study had confirmed VTE and were treated initially with standard anticoagulant therapy for 6 to 12 months.

During EINSTEIN CHOICE, 3365 patients received rivaroxaban at 10 mg, rivaroxaban at 20 mg, or aspirin at 100 mg once daily for up to 12 months of extended treatment.

Both rivaroxaban doses were superior to aspirin in preventing fatal or non-fatal recurrent VTE, the study’s primary efficacy endpoint.

The rate of recurrent VTE was 1.2% in the 10 mg rivaroxaban arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001), 1.5% in the 20 mg rivaroxaban arm (HR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P<0.001), and 4.4% in the aspirin arm. Fatal VTE occurred in 0%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of patients, respectively.

The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% for the 10 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=1.64; 95% CI, 0.39 to 6.84; P=0.50), 0.5% for the 20 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=2.01; 95% CI, 0.50 to 8.04; P=0.32), and 0.3% for the aspirin group.

Image by Andre E.X. Brown

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted for priority review a supplemental new drug application (sNDA) for rivaroxaban (XARELTO®).

The sNDA is for a 10 mg once-daily dose of rivaroxaban to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients who have received at least 6 months of standard anticoagulant therapy.

The FDA grants priority review to applications for products that may provide significant improvements in the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of serious conditions.

The agency’s goal is to take action on a priority review application within 6 months of receiving it, rather than the standard 10 months.

The FDA plans to make a decision on the rivaroxaban sNDA by October 28, 2017.

The sNDA is supported by data from the EINSTEIN CHOICE study. Patients enrolled in this study had confirmed VTE and were treated initially with standard anticoagulant therapy for 6 to 12 months.

During EINSTEIN CHOICE, 3365 patients received rivaroxaban at 10 mg, rivaroxaban at 20 mg, or aspirin at 100 mg once daily for up to 12 months of extended treatment.

Both rivaroxaban doses were superior to aspirin in preventing fatal or non-fatal recurrent VTE, the study’s primary efficacy endpoint.

The rate of recurrent VTE was 1.2% in the 10 mg rivaroxaban arm (hazard ratio [HR]=0.26; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.47; P<0.001), 1.5% in the 20 mg rivaroxaban arm (HR=0.34; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.59; P<0.001), and 4.4% in the aspirin arm. Fatal VTE occurred in 0%, 0.2%, and 0.2% of patients, respectively.

The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

The rate of major bleeding was 0.4% for the 10 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=1.64; 95% CI, 0.39 to 6.84; P=0.50), 0.5% for the 20 mg rivaroxaban group (HR=2.01; 95% CI, 0.50 to 8.04; P=0.32), and 0.3% for the aspirin group.

Given the history that the rash persisted for longer than 3 months, the FP made the diagnosis of chronic urticaria. The cause of chronic urticaria (>6 weeks duration) is determined in less than 20% of cases. Because no cause was found in this case, the patient’s urticaria was determined to be chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Chronic urticaria is twice as common in women than in men. Urticaria is a dynamic process in which new wheals evolve as old ones resolve. The wheals result from localized capillary vasodilation, followed by transudation of protein-rich fluid into the surrounding skin. The wheals resolve when the fluid is slowly reabsorbed. Patients may benefit from avoiding potential urticarial precipitants such as aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opiates, and alcohol.

Second-generation H1 antihistamines, such as cetirizine, should be prescribed as first-line treatment for chronic urticaria. Increasing the dose of cetirizine from 10 mg/d to 20 mg/d produces a significant improvement in the severity of wheals and itching in urticaria refractory to the standard doses of antihistamines. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) notes in its 2014 evidence summary that international guidelines suggest that non-sedating antihistamines may be used at up to quadruple the manufacturers’ recommended dosages before changing to an alternative therapy. NICE recommends waiting up to 4 weeks to allow full effectiveness of the antihistamines before considering referral to a specialist.

The patient in this case was started on cetirizine 10 mg twice daily with written instructions to gradually increase up to 20 mg twice daily if the lower doses were not working. With cetirizine 20 mg twice daily, the chronic urticaria subsided and the patient was satisfied with the results.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Usatine R. Urticaria and angioedema. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 863-870.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Given the history that the rash persisted for longer than 3 months, the FP made the diagnosis of chronic urticaria. The cause of chronic urticaria (>6 weeks duration) is determined in less than 20% of cases. Because no cause was found in this case, the patient’s urticaria was determined to be chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Chronic urticaria is twice as common in women than in men. Urticaria is a dynamic process in which new wheals evolve as old ones resolve. The wheals result from localized capillary vasodilation, followed by transudation of protein-rich fluid into the surrounding skin. The wheals resolve when the fluid is slowly reabsorbed. Patients may benefit from avoiding potential urticarial precipitants such as aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opiates, and alcohol.

Second-generation H1 antihistamines, such as cetirizine, should be prescribed as first-line treatment for chronic urticaria. Increasing the dose of cetirizine from 10 mg/d to 20 mg/d produces a significant improvement in the severity of wheals and itching in urticaria refractory to the standard doses of antihistamines. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) notes in its 2014 evidence summary that international guidelines suggest that non-sedating antihistamines may be used at up to quadruple the manufacturers’ recommended dosages before changing to an alternative therapy. NICE recommends waiting up to 4 weeks to allow full effectiveness of the antihistamines before considering referral to a specialist.

The patient in this case was started on cetirizine 10 mg twice daily with written instructions to gradually increase up to 20 mg twice daily if the lower doses were not working. With cetirizine 20 mg twice daily, the chronic urticaria subsided and the patient was satisfied with the results.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Usatine R. Urticaria and angioedema. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 863-870.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Given the history that the rash persisted for longer than 3 months, the FP made the diagnosis of chronic urticaria. The cause of chronic urticaria (>6 weeks duration) is determined in less than 20% of cases. Because no cause was found in this case, the patient’s urticaria was determined to be chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Chronic urticaria is twice as common in women than in men. Urticaria is a dynamic process in which new wheals evolve as old ones resolve. The wheals result from localized capillary vasodilation, followed by transudation of protein-rich fluid into the surrounding skin. The wheals resolve when the fluid is slowly reabsorbed. Patients may benefit from avoiding potential urticarial precipitants such as aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opiates, and alcohol.

Second-generation H1 antihistamines, such as cetirizine, should be prescribed as first-line treatment for chronic urticaria. Increasing the dose of cetirizine from 10 mg/d to 20 mg/d produces a significant improvement in the severity of wheals and itching in urticaria refractory to the standard doses of antihistamines. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) notes in its 2014 evidence summary that international guidelines suggest that non-sedating antihistamines may be used at up to quadruple the manufacturers’ recommended dosages before changing to an alternative therapy. NICE recommends waiting up to 4 weeks to allow full effectiveness of the antihistamines before considering referral to a specialist.

The patient in this case was started on cetirizine 10 mg twice daily with written instructions to gradually increase up to 20 mg twice daily if the lower doses were not working. With cetirizine 20 mg twice daily, the chronic urticaria subsided and the patient was satisfied with the results.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Usatine R. Urticaria and angioedema. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 863-870.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Hypoglycemia, a frequently encountered medical emergency, is usually seen in patients with diabetes, most commonly as a result of iatrogenesis. However, it can also be encountered in nondiabetic patients. Various causes, such as pancreatic islet cell tumors producing insulin, primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, advanced liver disease, pheochromocytoma and hypothyroidism, have been found to contribute to the condition in the nondiabetic population.¹ In rare cases, an excessive production of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) – a condition known as nonislet cell tumor-induced hypoglycemia (NICTH) – has also been found to cause hypoglycemia. Hypoinsulinemic hypoglycemia, with low IGF-1 levels and an IGF-2-IgF1 ratio of greater than 10, is found to be suggestive of NICTH.

Case presentation and summary

An 81-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus, systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and metastatic classical gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma presented to the emergency department with an acute change in mental status resulting from a new onset hypoglycemia. He was admitted, and during his hospital stay, he experienced severe hypoglycemic episodes with symptomatic presentations of diaphoresis on multiple occasions. A detailed history revealed that for diabetes, the patient had been on insulin for the first 12 years after his diagnosis, after which he was switched to metformin 500 mg twice daily for about 2 years, and as a satisfactory glycemic control was attained, eventually metformin had also been stopped 3 years prior to the current presentation.

The patient’s past medical records were obtained from the hospital at which he had been diagnosed gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma. Patient had not received treatment for the cancer as the disease was too widespread to be treated. The gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma, which had initially been surgically resected 7 years before the current presentation, had a recurrence 3 years later with abdominal and pulmonary metastasis, but no liver metastasis. No further intervention was carried out because the widely metastasized disease would not have benefited from any more surgical intervention and chemotherapy was not initiated because of the patient’s comorbid illnesses.

A blood sample drawn from the patient at the time of one hypoglycemic event, revealed low serum insulin <0.1 U/ml (normal, 2-19.6 U/ml); low C-peptide level, 0.59 ng/ml (0.8-3.85 ng/ml); low IGF-1, 16 ng/ml (5-4 ng/ml); and IGF-3, 0.9 ng/ml (2.2-4.5 ng/ml). IGF-2 levels were found to be markedly elevated at 945 ng/ml (47-350 ng/ml). The calculated IGF-2-IGF-1 ratio was 59.06 (normal, <10), suggesting NICTH as the etiology for the patient’s hypoglycemia.

The hypoglycemic episodes were initially treated with a continuous dextrose infusion followed by diazoxide treatment. However, diazoxide did not prevent his hypoglycemic episodes, so dexamethasone was considered as an alternative for his condition. The dexamethasone treatment resulted in the normalization of the patient’s serum glucose levels and resolution of his symptoms. The patient was discharged in a satisfactory state few days later and followed up thereafter. No recurrence of hypoglycemic episodes was found, and he was continued on dexamethasone therapy.

Discussion

Hypoglycemia due to NICTH is rare, with a prevalence of four times less than that of insulinoma.³ In most cases, NICTH occurs in patients with solid tumors of mesenchymal and epithelial origins such as hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric carcinoma or mesothelioma.⁴ In NICTH, the serum levels of insulin, C-peptide, and IGF-1 are usually decreased or undetectable. However, the circulating levels of total IGF2 may be increased, decreased, or normal. Concurrent normal to high morning cortisol and normal response to cosyntropin stimulation can rule out adrenal insufficiency and suggest NICTH. An IGF-2: IGF-1 ratio of >10 is considered to be clinically significant and highly suggestive of NICTH.⁵ Hypoglycemia in NICTH can be managed by administration of oral glucose, intravenous dextrose or glucagon. In some cases, diazoxide, a potent inhibitor of insulin secretion, has been found to be useful.⁶ Diazoxide directly inhibits the release of insulin through stimulation of adrenergic receptors and also has an extra pancreatic hyperglycemic effect, probably by inhibiting cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase, resulting in higher plasma levels of cyclic AMP and enhanced glycogenolysis.

Glucocorticoid therapy has been shown to suppress IGF-2 in a dose dependent manner and also by increasing gluconeogenesis.⁷ Surgical resection of the tumor whenever possible is the treatment of choice followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for inoperable disease and if successful, usually results in resolution of hypoglycemia. Imatinib, is the chemotherapeutic drug of choice for metastatic GIST, but many case reports have suggested worsening of hypoglycemia in advanced GIST with the use of the drug.⁸ The patient described in our report was not on any chemotherapy, hence hypoglycemia could not be attributed to it. On the basis of findings among 24 patients with GIST, Rikhof and colleagues have recommended monitoring plasma levels of pro-IGF-IIE to identify patients at high risk for developing hypoglycemia, especially those with progressive disease.⁹ Furthermore, over expression of IGF-2 as a predictor of potential relapse may be an area for potential research and further study.¹⁰

Hypoglycemia, a frequently encountered medical emergency, is usually seen in patients with diabetes, most commonly as a result of iatrogenesis. However, it can also be encountered in nondiabetic patients. Various causes, such as pancreatic islet cell tumors producing insulin, primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, advanced liver disease, pheochromocytoma and hypothyroidism, have been found to contribute to the condition in the nondiabetic population.¹ In rare cases, an excessive production of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) – a condition known as nonislet cell tumor-induced hypoglycemia (NICTH) – has also been found to cause hypoglycemia. Hypoinsulinemic hypoglycemia, with low IGF-1 levels and an IGF-2-IgF1 ratio of greater than 10, is found to be suggestive of NICTH.

Case presentation and summary

An 81-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus, systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and metastatic classical gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma presented to the emergency department with an acute change in mental status resulting from a new onset hypoglycemia. He was admitted, and during his hospital stay, he experienced severe hypoglycemic episodes with symptomatic presentations of diaphoresis on multiple occasions. A detailed history revealed that for diabetes, the patient had been on insulin for the first 12 years after his diagnosis, after which he was switched to metformin 500 mg twice daily for about 2 years, and as a satisfactory glycemic control was attained, eventually metformin had also been stopped 3 years prior to the current presentation.

The patient’s past medical records were obtained from the hospital at which he had been diagnosed gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma. Patient had not received treatment for the cancer as the disease was too widespread to be treated. The gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma, which had initially been surgically resected 7 years before the current presentation, had a recurrence 3 years later with abdominal and pulmonary metastasis, but no liver metastasis. No further intervention was carried out because the widely metastasized disease would not have benefited from any more surgical intervention and chemotherapy was not initiated because of the patient’s comorbid illnesses.

A blood sample drawn from the patient at the time of one hypoglycemic event, revealed low serum insulin <0.1 U/ml (normal, 2-19.6 U/ml); low C-peptide level, 0.59 ng/ml (0.8-3.85 ng/ml); low IGF-1, 16 ng/ml (5-4 ng/ml); and IGF-3, 0.9 ng/ml (2.2-4.5 ng/ml). IGF-2 levels were found to be markedly elevated at 945 ng/ml (47-350 ng/ml). The calculated IGF-2-IGF-1 ratio was 59.06 (normal, <10), suggesting NICTH as the etiology for the patient’s hypoglycemia.

The hypoglycemic episodes were initially treated with a continuous dextrose infusion followed by diazoxide treatment. However, diazoxide did not prevent his hypoglycemic episodes, so dexamethasone was considered as an alternative for his condition. The dexamethasone treatment resulted in the normalization of the patient’s serum glucose levels and resolution of his symptoms. The patient was discharged in a satisfactory state few days later and followed up thereafter. No recurrence of hypoglycemic episodes was found, and he was continued on dexamethasone therapy.

Discussion

Hypoglycemia due to NICTH is rare, with a prevalence of four times less than that of insulinoma.³ In most cases, NICTH occurs in patients with solid tumors of mesenchymal and epithelial origins such as hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric carcinoma or mesothelioma.⁴ In NICTH, the serum levels of insulin, C-peptide, and IGF-1 are usually decreased or undetectable. However, the circulating levels of total IGF2 may be increased, decreased, or normal. Concurrent normal to high morning cortisol and normal response to cosyntropin stimulation can rule out adrenal insufficiency and suggest NICTH. An IGF-2: IGF-1 ratio of >10 is considered to be clinically significant and highly suggestive of NICTH.⁵ Hypoglycemia in NICTH can be managed by administration of oral glucose, intravenous dextrose or glucagon. In some cases, diazoxide, a potent inhibitor of insulin secretion, has been found to be useful.⁶ Diazoxide directly inhibits the release of insulin through stimulation of adrenergic receptors and also has an extra pancreatic hyperglycemic effect, probably by inhibiting cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase, resulting in higher plasma levels of cyclic AMP and enhanced glycogenolysis.

Glucocorticoid therapy has been shown to suppress IGF-2 in a dose dependent manner and also by increasing gluconeogenesis.⁷ Surgical resection of the tumor whenever possible is the treatment of choice followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for inoperable disease and if successful, usually results in resolution of hypoglycemia. Imatinib, is the chemotherapeutic drug of choice for metastatic GIST, but many case reports have suggested worsening of hypoglycemia in advanced GIST with the use of the drug.⁸ The patient described in our report was not on any chemotherapy, hence hypoglycemia could not be attributed to it. On the basis of findings among 24 patients with GIST, Rikhof and colleagues have recommended monitoring plasma levels of pro-IGF-IIE to identify patients at high risk for developing hypoglycemia, especially those with progressive disease.⁹ Furthermore, over expression of IGF-2 as a predictor of potential relapse may be an area for potential research and further study.¹⁰

Hypoglycemia, a frequently encountered medical emergency, is usually seen in patients with diabetes, most commonly as a result of iatrogenesis. However, it can also be encountered in nondiabetic patients. Various causes, such as pancreatic islet cell tumors producing insulin, primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency, advanced liver disease, pheochromocytoma and hypothyroidism, have been found to contribute to the condition in the nondiabetic population.¹ In rare cases, an excessive production of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-2) – a condition known as nonislet cell tumor-induced hypoglycemia (NICTH) – has also been found to cause hypoglycemia. Hypoinsulinemic hypoglycemia, with low IGF-1 levels and an IGF-2-IgF1 ratio of greater than 10, is found to be suggestive of NICTH.

Case presentation and summary

An 81-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus, systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and metastatic classical gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma presented to the emergency department with an acute change in mental status resulting from a new onset hypoglycemia. He was admitted, and during his hospital stay, he experienced severe hypoglycemic episodes with symptomatic presentations of diaphoresis on multiple occasions. A detailed history revealed that for diabetes, the patient had been on insulin for the first 12 years after his diagnosis, after which he was switched to metformin 500 mg twice daily for about 2 years, and as a satisfactory glycemic control was attained, eventually metformin had also been stopped 3 years prior to the current presentation.

The patient’s past medical records were obtained from the hospital at which he had been diagnosed gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma. Patient had not received treatment for the cancer as the disease was too widespread to be treated. The gastrointestinal spindle cell sarcoma, which had initially been surgically resected 7 years before the current presentation, had a recurrence 3 years later with abdominal and pulmonary metastasis, but no liver metastasis. No further intervention was carried out because the widely metastasized disease would not have benefited from any more surgical intervention and chemotherapy was not initiated because of the patient’s comorbid illnesses.

A blood sample drawn from the patient at the time of one hypoglycemic event, revealed low serum insulin <0.1 U/ml (normal, 2-19.6 U/ml); low C-peptide level, 0.59 ng/ml (0.8-3.85 ng/ml); low IGF-1, 16 ng/ml (5-4 ng/ml); and IGF-3, 0.9 ng/ml (2.2-4.5 ng/ml). IGF-2 levels were found to be markedly elevated at 945 ng/ml (47-350 ng/ml). The calculated IGF-2-IGF-1 ratio was 59.06 (normal, <10), suggesting NICTH as the etiology for the patient’s hypoglycemia.

The hypoglycemic episodes were initially treated with a continuous dextrose infusion followed by diazoxide treatment. However, diazoxide did not prevent his hypoglycemic episodes, so dexamethasone was considered as an alternative for his condition. The dexamethasone treatment resulted in the normalization of the patient’s serum glucose levels and resolution of his symptoms. The patient was discharged in a satisfactory state few days later and followed up thereafter. No recurrence of hypoglycemic episodes was found, and he was continued on dexamethasone therapy.

Discussion

Hypoglycemia due to NICTH is rare, with a prevalence of four times less than that of insulinoma.³ In most cases, NICTH occurs in patients with solid tumors of mesenchymal and epithelial origins such as hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric carcinoma or mesothelioma.⁴ In NICTH, the serum levels of insulin, C-peptide, and IGF-1 are usually decreased or undetectable. However, the circulating levels of total IGF2 may be increased, decreased, or normal. Concurrent normal to high morning cortisol and normal response to cosyntropin stimulation can rule out adrenal insufficiency and suggest NICTH. An IGF-2: IGF-1 ratio of >10 is considered to be clinically significant and highly suggestive of NICTH.⁵ Hypoglycemia in NICTH can be managed by administration of oral glucose, intravenous dextrose or glucagon. In some cases, diazoxide, a potent inhibitor of insulin secretion, has been found to be useful.⁶ Diazoxide directly inhibits the release of insulin through stimulation of adrenergic receptors and also has an extra pancreatic hyperglycemic effect, probably by inhibiting cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase, resulting in higher plasma levels of cyclic AMP and enhanced glycogenolysis.

Glucocorticoid therapy has been shown to suppress IGF-2 in a dose dependent manner and also by increasing gluconeogenesis.⁷ Surgical resection of the tumor whenever possible is the treatment of choice followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy for inoperable disease and if successful, usually results in resolution of hypoglycemia. Imatinib, is the chemotherapeutic drug of choice for metastatic GIST, but many case reports have suggested worsening of hypoglycemia in advanced GIST with the use of the drug.⁸ The patient described in our report was not on any chemotherapy, hence hypoglycemia could not be attributed to it. On the basis of findings among 24 patients with GIST, Rikhof and colleagues have recommended monitoring plasma levels of pro-IGF-IIE to identify patients at high risk for developing hypoglycemia, especially those with progressive disease.⁹ Furthermore, over expression of IGF-2 as a predictor of potential relapse may be an area for potential research and further study.¹⁰

MADRID – The rates of both total hip and total knee replacement surgeries dropped among Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis since the mid-1990s, reductions that were coincident with more widespread use of biologic drugs as well as with other improvements in care, according to analyses of Danish national health records.

“The introduction of guidelines [on biologic drug use] in 2002 and increasing use of biologic drugs [as a result] may have contributed to this positive development,” Lene Dreyer, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology. Other factors that may have also contributed include widespread use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and adoption of a treat-to-target strategy by many clinicians.

In 1996, the first year studied and before any biologic DMARDs were routinely used for rheumatoid arthritis, the rate of total knee replacement was nearly 6/1,000 person-years among RA patients, compared with a 0.42/1,000 person-years rate in the general adult Danish population, a roughly 14-fold excess among the RA patients, Dr. Dreyer reported. But by 2016, ”this gap had almost disappeared,” she said in a video interview. “It seems like rheumatologists in Denmark are doing a good job” treating RA patients.

That may have been especially true subsequent to 2002, when the Danish Institute for Rational Pharmacotherapy issued recommendations that opened the door to wider use of biologic DMARDs, such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, to treat RA patients, noted Dr. Dreyer of Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen. During 2003-2011, use of total knee replacement surgery in RA patients fell by an average annualized rate of 0.2 surgeries/1,000 person-years. But among the general Danish population the average annualized rate of knee surgeries rose by 0.08/1,000 person-years.

“This is a very important finding,” commented Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, professor of rheumatology at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam. “It is extremely difficult to test the effect of the introduction of the [biologic DMARD] guidelines,” he cautioned. But he highlighted the positive finding that the excess of hip and knee replacement surgeries in patients with RA, compared with the general population, had recently narrowed.

Dr. Dreyer and her associates used records from the Danish National Patient Register to compare 29,427 patients with incident RA during 1996-2011 with more than 290,000 matched control individuals. All people studied had not undergone knee or hip replacement surgery prior to their entry into the study. The researchers used an “interrupted time series analysis” to examine the possible impact of the introduction of widespread access to biologic DMARDs starting in 2003.

The analysis showed that the rate of total hip replacements in 1996 was nearly 9 surgeries/1,000 person-years among RA patients and nearly 3/1,000 person-years in the general population, a threefold excess for RA patients. This rate fell by an average annual rate of 0.38/1,000 person-years among RA patients both before and after 2002, so that by 2011 the rate was roughly half the 1996 rate, about 4.5/1,000 patient-years. The rate in the general population rose during 1996-2011, and by 2011 was nearly 4/1,000 person-years and so nearly the same as RA patients. Wider availability of biologic DMARDs for RA patients starting in 2003 did not have an apparent impact on the rate of total hip replacement.

In contrast, wider use of biologic DMARDs appeared to have an effect on the rate of total knee surgeries among RA patients. During 1996-2001, the rate rose by an annual average of 0.19/1,000 person-years, very similar to the 0.21/1,000 person-years annual rise in the general Danish population. However, during 2003-2011, the average annual rate of total knee surgery fell by 0.20/1,000 person-years in the RA patients but continued to rise at an annual average rate of 0.08/1,000 person-years in the general population, Dr. Dreyer reported.

Additional Danish registry data exist for patients who received biologic DMARDs, and Dr. Dreyer said that she and her associates hope to use this to further examine the impact of these drugs on patient outcomes.

Dr. Dreyer has received lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and UCB. Dr. Landewé has received consulting fees from several drug companies.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

MADRID – The rates of both total hip and total knee replacement surgeries dropped among Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis since the mid-1990s, reductions that were coincident with more widespread use of biologic drugs as well as with other improvements in care, according to analyses of Danish national health records.

“The introduction of guidelines [on biologic drug use] in 2002 and increasing use of biologic drugs [as a result] may have contributed to this positive development,” Lene Dreyer, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology. Other factors that may have also contributed include widespread use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and adoption of a treat-to-target strategy by many clinicians.

In 1996, the first year studied and before any biologic DMARDs were routinely used for rheumatoid arthritis, the rate of total knee replacement was nearly 6/1,000 person-years among RA patients, compared with a 0.42/1,000 person-years rate in the general adult Danish population, a roughly 14-fold excess among the RA patients, Dr. Dreyer reported. But by 2016, ”this gap had almost disappeared,” she said in a video interview. “It seems like rheumatologists in Denmark are doing a good job” treating RA patients.

That may have been especially true subsequent to 2002, when the Danish Institute for Rational Pharmacotherapy issued recommendations that opened the door to wider use of biologic DMARDs, such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, to treat RA patients, noted Dr. Dreyer of Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen. During 2003-2011, use of total knee replacement surgery in RA patients fell by an average annualized rate of 0.2 surgeries/1,000 person-years. But among the general Danish population the average annualized rate of knee surgeries rose by 0.08/1,000 person-years.

“This is a very important finding,” commented Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, professor of rheumatology at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam. “It is extremely difficult to test the effect of the introduction of the [biologic DMARD] guidelines,” he cautioned. But he highlighted the positive finding that the excess of hip and knee replacement surgeries in patients with RA, compared with the general population, had recently narrowed.

Dr. Dreyer and her associates used records from the Danish National Patient Register to compare 29,427 patients with incident RA during 1996-2011 with more than 290,000 matched control individuals. All people studied had not undergone knee or hip replacement surgery prior to their entry into the study. The researchers used an “interrupted time series analysis” to examine the possible impact of the introduction of widespread access to biologic DMARDs starting in 2003.

The analysis showed that the rate of total hip replacements in 1996 was nearly 9 surgeries/1,000 person-years among RA patients and nearly 3/1,000 person-years in the general population, a threefold excess for RA patients. This rate fell by an average annual rate of 0.38/1,000 person-years among RA patients both before and after 2002, so that by 2011 the rate was roughly half the 1996 rate, about 4.5/1,000 patient-years. The rate in the general population rose during 1996-2011, and by 2011 was nearly 4/1,000 person-years and so nearly the same as RA patients. Wider availability of biologic DMARDs for RA patients starting in 2003 did not have an apparent impact on the rate of total hip replacement.

In contrast, wider use of biologic DMARDs appeared to have an effect on the rate of total knee surgeries among RA patients. During 1996-2001, the rate rose by an annual average of 0.19/1,000 person-years, very similar to the 0.21/1,000 person-years annual rise in the general Danish population. However, during 2003-2011, the average annual rate of total knee surgery fell by 0.20/1,000 person-years in the RA patients but continued to rise at an annual average rate of 0.08/1,000 person-years in the general population, Dr. Dreyer reported.

Additional Danish registry data exist for patients who received biologic DMARDs, and Dr. Dreyer said that she and her associates hope to use this to further examine the impact of these drugs on patient outcomes.

Dr. Dreyer has received lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and UCB. Dr. Landewé has received consulting fees from several drug companies.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

MADRID – The rates of both total hip and total knee replacement surgeries dropped among Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis since the mid-1990s, reductions that were coincident with more widespread use of biologic drugs as well as with other improvements in care, according to analyses of Danish national health records.

“The introduction of guidelines [on biologic drug use] in 2002 and increasing use of biologic drugs [as a result] may have contributed to this positive development,” Lene Dreyer, MD, said at the European Congress of Rheumatology. Other factors that may have also contributed include widespread use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and adoption of a treat-to-target strategy by many clinicians.

In 1996, the first year studied and before any biologic DMARDs were routinely used for rheumatoid arthritis, the rate of total knee replacement was nearly 6/1,000 person-years among RA patients, compared with a 0.42/1,000 person-years rate in the general adult Danish population, a roughly 14-fold excess among the RA patients, Dr. Dreyer reported. But by 2016, ”this gap had almost disappeared,” she said in a video interview. “It seems like rheumatologists in Denmark are doing a good job” treating RA patients.

That may have been especially true subsequent to 2002, when the Danish Institute for Rational Pharmacotherapy issued recommendations that opened the door to wider use of biologic DMARDs, such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, to treat RA patients, noted Dr. Dreyer of Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen. During 2003-2011, use of total knee replacement surgery in RA patients fell by an average annualized rate of 0.2 surgeries/1,000 person-years. But among the general Danish population the average annualized rate of knee surgeries rose by 0.08/1,000 person-years.

“This is a very important finding,” commented Robert Landewé, MD, PhD, professor of rheumatology at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam. “It is extremely difficult to test the effect of the introduction of the [biologic DMARD] guidelines,” he cautioned. But he highlighted the positive finding that the excess of hip and knee replacement surgeries in patients with RA, compared with the general population, had recently narrowed.

Dr. Dreyer and her associates used records from the Danish National Patient Register to compare 29,427 patients with incident RA during 1996-2011 with more than 290,000 matched control individuals. All people studied had not undergone knee or hip replacement surgery prior to their entry into the study. The researchers used an “interrupted time series analysis” to examine the possible impact of the introduction of widespread access to biologic DMARDs starting in 2003.

The analysis showed that the rate of total hip replacements in 1996 was nearly 9 surgeries/1,000 person-years among RA patients and nearly 3/1,000 person-years in the general population, a threefold excess for RA patients. This rate fell by an average annual rate of 0.38/1,000 person-years among RA patients both before and after 2002, so that by 2011 the rate was roughly half the 1996 rate, about 4.5/1,000 patient-years. The rate in the general population rose during 1996-2011, and by 2011 was nearly 4/1,000 person-years and so nearly the same as RA patients. Wider availability of biologic DMARDs for RA patients starting in 2003 did not have an apparent impact on the rate of total hip replacement.

In contrast, wider use of biologic DMARDs appeared to have an effect on the rate of total knee surgeries among RA patients. During 1996-2001, the rate rose by an annual average of 0.19/1,000 person-years, very similar to the 0.21/1,000 person-years annual rise in the general Danish population. However, during 2003-2011, the average annual rate of total knee surgery fell by 0.20/1,000 person-years in the RA patients but continued to rise at an annual average rate of 0.08/1,000 person-years in the general population, Dr. Dreyer reported.

Additional Danish registry data exist for patients who received biologic DMARDs, and Dr. Dreyer said that she and her associates hope to use this to further examine the impact of these drugs on patient outcomes.

Dr. Dreyer has received lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and UCB. Dr. Landewé has received consulting fees from several drug companies.

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

MADRID – Obese patients with axial spondyloarthritis were substantially less responsive to treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor than were healthy-weight patients in a multicenter Swiss study with 531 patients.

In a multivariate analysis that controlled for several demographic and clinical factors, including baseline disease severity, obese patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) were 70% less likely to achieve a 40% or better improvement in their Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society improvement criteria (ASAS 40) when compared with patients with a healthy body mass index (BMI), Raphael Micheroli, MD, reported in a poster at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

MADRID – Obese patients with axial spondyloarthritis were substantially less responsive to treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor than were healthy-weight patients in a multicenter Swiss study with 531 patients.

In a multivariate analysis that controlled for several demographic and clinical factors, including baseline disease severity, obese patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) were 70% less likely to achieve a 40% or better improvement in their Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society improvement criteria (ASAS 40) when compared with patients with a healthy body mass index (BMI), Raphael Micheroli, MD, reported in a poster at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

MADRID – Obese patients with axial spondyloarthritis were substantially less responsive to treatment with a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor than were healthy-weight patients in a multicenter Swiss study with 531 patients.

In a multivariate analysis that controlled for several demographic and clinical factors, including baseline disease severity, obese patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) were 70% less likely to achieve a 40% or better improvement in their Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society improvement criteria (ASAS 40) when compared with patients with a healthy body mass index (BMI), Raphael Micheroli, MD, reported in a poster at the European Congress of Rheumatology.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

[email protected]

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Transcranial direct-current stimulation did not show noninferiority to escitalopram for major depressive disorder in a single-center trial. The results were published online June 29.

The randomized double-blind placebo-controlled noninferiority study involved 245 adults with moderate to severe depression, many of whom had coexisting anxiety disorder. This “reflects a typical clinical population in which treatment for depression is indicated,” said André R. Brunoni, MD, PhD, of the Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Institute of Psychiatry and Laboratory of Neurosciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil, and his associates.

A total of 94 patients were assigned to receive active tDCS plus oral placebo (tDCS group), 91 to receive sham tDCS plus escitalopram (escitalopram group), and 60 to receive sham tDCS plus oral placebo (placebo group) for 10 weeks. The primary outcome – decrease in mean depression score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale – was 9.0 points with tDCS, 11.3 points with escitalopram, and 5.8 points with placebo. Thus, tDCS did not achieve noninferiority to escitalopram, the investigators said (N Engl J Med. 2017 June 29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612999).

Although tDCS was superior to placebo in some secondary outcomes, including rate of clinical response (defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the Hamilton or the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale), it was associated with significantly more adverse events. The tDCS group reported more tinnitus, more nervousness, and more itching, tingling, burning, and skin redness at the electrode sites than did the other study groups. The escitalopram group reported higher rates of sleepiness and obstipation than did the other study groups.

One concerning finding was that two patients in the tDCS group developed new-onset mania during treatment, Dr. Brunoni and his associates noted.

“Future studies of tDCS could investigate different total doses of electrical stimulation in patients with major depressive disorder,” they wrote.

This trial was supported by the Fundacão de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, the Sao Paulo State Foundation, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, the Associacao Beneficente Alzira Denise Hertzog de Silva, and the Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. Soterix Medical supplied the tDCS devices, and Libbs Laboratory supplied the escitalopram used in this study free of charge. Dr. Brunoni reported ties to Soterix Medical, Libbs Laboratory, and Delta Medical. His associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Transcranial direct-current stimulation did not show noninferiority to escitalopram for major depressive disorder in a single-center trial. The results were published online June 29.

The randomized double-blind placebo-controlled noninferiority study involved 245 adults with moderate to severe depression, many of whom had coexisting anxiety disorder. This “reflects a typical clinical population in which treatment for depression is indicated,” said André R. Brunoni, MD, PhD, of the Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Institute of Psychiatry and Laboratory of Neurosciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil, and his associates.

A total of 94 patients were assigned to receive active tDCS plus oral placebo (tDCS group), 91 to receive sham tDCS plus escitalopram (escitalopram group), and 60 to receive sham tDCS plus oral placebo (placebo group) for 10 weeks. The primary outcome – decrease in mean depression score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale – was 9.0 points with tDCS, 11.3 points with escitalopram, and 5.8 points with placebo. Thus, tDCS did not achieve noninferiority to escitalopram, the investigators said (N Engl J Med. 2017 June 29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612999).

Although tDCS was superior to placebo in some secondary outcomes, including rate of clinical response (defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the Hamilton or the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale), it was associated with significantly more adverse events. The tDCS group reported more tinnitus, more nervousness, and more itching, tingling, burning, and skin redness at the electrode sites than did the other study groups. The escitalopram group reported higher rates of sleepiness and obstipation than did the other study groups.

One concerning finding was that two patients in the tDCS group developed new-onset mania during treatment, Dr. Brunoni and his associates noted.

“Future studies of tDCS could investigate different total doses of electrical stimulation in patients with major depressive disorder,” they wrote.

This trial was supported by the Fundacão de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, the Sao Paulo State Foundation, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, the Associacao Beneficente Alzira Denise Hertzog de Silva, and the Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. Soterix Medical supplied the tDCS devices, and Libbs Laboratory supplied the escitalopram used in this study free of charge. Dr. Brunoni reported ties to Soterix Medical, Libbs Laboratory, and Delta Medical. His associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Transcranial direct-current stimulation did not show noninferiority to escitalopram for major depressive disorder in a single-center trial. The results were published online June 29.

The randomized double-blind placebo-controlled noninferiority study involved 245 adults with moderate to severe depression, many of whom had coexisting anxiety disorder. This “reflects a typical clinical population in which treatment for depression is indicated,” said André R. Brunoni, MD, PhD, of the Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Institute of Psychiatry and Laboratory of Neurosciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil, and his associates.

A total of 94 patients were assigned to receive active tDCS plus oral placebo (tDCS group), 91 to receive sham tDCS plus escitalopram (escitalopram group), and 60 to receive sham tDCS plus oral placebo (placebo group) for 10 weeks. The primary outcome – decrease in mean depression score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale – was 9.0 points with tDCS, 11.3 points with escitalopram, and 5.8 points with placebo. Thus, tDCS did not achieve noninferiority to escitalopram, the investigators said (N Engl J Med. 2017 June 29. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612999).

Although tDCS was superior to placebo in some secondary outcomes, including rate of clinical response (defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the Hamilton or the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale), it was associated with significantly more adverse events. The tDCS group reported more tinnitus, more nervousness, and more itching, tingling, burning, and skin redness at the electrode sites than did the other study groups. The escitalopram group reported higher rates of sleepiness and obstipation than did the other study groups.

One concerning finding was that two patients in the tDCS group developed new-onset mania during treatment, Dr. Brunoni and his associates noted.

“Future studies of tDCS could investigate different total doses of electrical stimulation in patients with major depressive disorder,” they wrote.

This trial was supported by the Fundacão de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, the Sao Paulo State Foundation, the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, the Associacao Beneficente Alzira Denise Hertzog de Silva, and the Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. Soterix Medical supplied the tDCS devices, and Libbs Laboratory supplied the escitalopram used in this study free of charge. Dr. Brunoni reported ties to Soterix Medical, Libbs Laboratory, and Delta Medical. His associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

For patients who have a single, small skin abscess, the addition of oral antibiotics to standard incision and drainage of the lesion improves cure rates and decreases recurrence rates, according to a study published online June 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The results of this multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, taken together with those of another recent large study, “call into question the perception – largely based on expert opinion or smaller, underpowered, and lower-quality noninferiority trials – that cure rates do not improve with the addition of systemic antibiotic treatment after incision and drainage,” said Robert S. Daum, MD, professor of pediatrics at the University of Chicago, and his associates.

The trial involved 786 patients of all ages (64% were adults and 36% were children; mean age was 25.5 years) who had a single, uncomplicated skin abscess of 5 cm or smaller and were treated at the University of Chicago; San Francisco General Hospital; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville; Washington University, St. Louis; or Emory University, Atlanta. A total of 266 patients were assigned to receive oral clindamycin, 263 to receive oral trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and 257 to receive matching placebo for 10 days after the lesions were incised and drained.

At follow-up 7-10 days following the conclusion of treatment, the rates of clinical cure were 83.1% with clindamycin and 81.7% with TMP-SMX, both significantly greater than the 68.9% cure rate with placebo (P less than .001 for both comparisons). Similarly, at 1-month follow-up, 78.6% of the clindamycin group and 73.0% of the TMP-SMX group “remained cured,” compared with 62.6% of the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017 June 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607033).

Among those with cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus, cure rates 7-10 days after treatment ended were 83.5% and 83.2% in the clindamycin and TMP-SMX groups, respectively, significantly higher than in the placebo group (63.8%). Among those positive for methicillin-resistant S. aureus, cure rates were 81.7% and 84.6% in the clindamycin and TMP-SMX groups, respectively, significantly higher than in the placebo group (62.9%).

The rate of treatment-associated adverse events was higher with clindamycin (21.9%) than with TMP-SMX (11.1%) or with placebo (12.5%). The most common adverse events were diarrhea and nausea, which were mild to moderate in severity and resolved with sequelae. There were no cases of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea or severe allergic reactions. One patient had a hypersensitivity reaction that was considered to be related to TMP-SMX, which involved fever, rash, thrombocytopenia, and hepatitis and which resolved without sequelae.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Research Resources supported the study. Dr. Daum reported ties to Pfizer, Dynavax, Theravance, and Merck, and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

For patients who have a single, small skin abscess, the addition of oral antibiotics to standard incision and drainage of the lesion improves cure rates and decreases recurrence rates, according to a study published online June 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The results of this multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, taken together with those of another recent large study, “call into question the perception – largely based on expert opinion or smaller, underpowered, and lower-quality noninferiority trials – that cure rates do not improve with the addition of systemic antibiotic treatment after incision and drainage,” said Robert S. Daum, MD, professor of pediatrics at the University of Chicago, and his associates.

The trial involved 786 patients of all ages (64% were adults and 36% were children; mean age was 25.5 years) who had a single, uncomplicated skin abscess of 5 cm or smaller and were treated at the University of Chicago; San Francisco General Hospital; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville; Washington University, St. Louis; or Emory University, Atlanta. A total of 266 patients were assigned to receive oral clindamycin, 263 to receive oral trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and 257 to receive matching placebo for 10 days after the lesions were incised and drained.

At follow-up 7-10 days following the conclusion of treatment, the rates of clinical cure were 83.1% with clindamycin and 81.7% with TMP-SMX, both significantly greater than the 68.9% cure rate with placebo (P less than .001 for both comparisons). Similarly, at 1-month follow-up, 78.6% of the clindamycin group and 73.0% of the TMP-SMX group “remained cured,” compared with 62.6% of the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017 June 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607033).

Among those with cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus, cure rates 7-10 days after treatment ended were 83.5% and 83.2% in the clindamycin and TMP-SMX groups, respectively, significantly higher than in the placebo group (63.8%). Among those positive for methicillin-resistant S. aureus, cure rates were 81.7% and 84.6% in the clindamycin and TMP-SMX groups, respectively, significantly higher than in the placebo group (62.9%).

The rate of treatment-associated adverse events was higher with clindamycin (21.9%) than with TMP-SMX (11.1%) or with placebo (12.5%). The most common adverse events were diarrhea and nausea, which were mild to moderate in severity and resolved with sequelae. There were no cases of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea or severe allergic reactions. One patient had a hypersensitivity reaction that was considered to be related to TMP-SMX, which involved fever, rash, thrombocytopenia, and hepatitis and which resolved without sequelae.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Research Resources supported the study. Dr. Daum reported ties to Pfizer, Dynavax, Theravance, and Merck, and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

For patients who have a single, small skin abscess, the addition of oral antibiotics to standard incision and drainage of the lesion improves cure rates and decreases recurrence rates, according to a study published online June 28 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The results of this multicenter prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, taken together with those of another recent large study, “call into question the perception – largely based on expert opinion or smaller, underpowered, and lower-quality noninferiority trials – that cure rates do not improve with the addition of systemic antibiotic treatment after incision and drainage,” said Robert S. Daum, MD, professor of pediatrics at the University of Chicago, and his associates.

The trial involved 786 patients of all ages (64% were adults and 36% were children; mean age was 25.5 years) who had a single, uncomplicated skin abscess of 5 cm or smaller and were treated at the University of Chicago; San Francisco General Hospital; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville; Washington University, St. Louis; or Emory University, Atlanta. A total of 266 patients were assigned to receive oral clindamycin, 263 to receive oral trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and 257 to receive matching placebo for 10 days after the lesions were incised and drained.

At follow-up 7-10 days following the conclusion of treatment, the rates of clinical cure were 83.1% with clindamycin and 81.7% with TMP-SMX, both significantly greater than the 68.9% cure rate with placebo (P less than .001 for both comparisons). Similarly, at 1-month follow-up, 78.6% of the clindamycin group and 73.0% of the TMP-SMX group “remained cured,” compared with 62.6% of the placebo group (N Engl J Med. 2017 June 28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607033).

Among those with cultures positive for Staphylococcus aureus, cure rates 7-10 days after treatment ended were 83.5% and 83.2% in the clindamycin and TMP-SMX groups, respectively, significantly higher than in the placebo group (63.8%). Among those positive for methicillin-resistant S. aureus, cure rates were 81.7% and 84.6% in the clindamycin and TMP-SMX groups, respectively, significantly higher than in the placebo group (62.9%).

The rate of treatment-associated adverse events was higher with clindamycin (21.9%) than with TMP-SMX (11.1%) or with placebo (12.5%). The most common adverse events were diarrhea and nausea, which were mild to moderate in severity and resolved with sequelae. There were no cases of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea or severe allergic reactions. One patient had a hypersensitivity reaction that was considered to be related to TMP-SMX, which involved fever, rash, thrombocytopenia, and hepatitis and which resolved without sequelae.

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Center for Research Resources supported the study. Dr. Daum reported ties to Pfizer, Dynavax, Theravance, and Merck, and his associates reported ties to numerous industry sources.

Blood vessels injured during trocar insertion: $8.7M verdict

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The resident was negligent in performing trocar insertion during laparoscopic surgery by inserting the trocar too far into the abdomen. The attending ObGyn did not supervise the resident properly. There is nothing in the patient's medical records to indicate that she had abnormal anatomy. The woman's life is in turmoil after what was supposed to be a routine procedure.

DEFENDANTS' DEFENSE:

There was no negligence. The patient's anatomy was abnormal, making the risk of surgery higher. The injury is a known complication of laparoscopic surgery.

VERDICT:

An $8,718,848 Illinois verdict was returned.

Related article:
How to avoid major vessel injury during gynecologic laparoscopy

Wrong fallopian tube transected: $1.8M award

A 28-year-old woman underwent an appendectomy. During the operation, the surgeon saw an abscess on the patient's right fallopian tube and called in an ObGyn to remove the abscess. While doing so, the ObGyn transected the left fallopian tube. Both fallopian tubes were removed.

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The surgeon did not tell the ObGyn which fallopian tube was abscessed and therefore the ObGyn operated on the wrong tube. In addition, the surgeon failed to obtain informed consent for bilateral salpingectomy. The patient is now unable to conceive without assisted reproductive treatment.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE:

The surgeon admitted his mistakes but disputed the informed consent claim. The patient probably would not have been able to conceive naturally due to the infection.

VERDICT:

A $1.8 million Connecticut verdict was returned.

Related article:
Elective laparoscopic appendectomy in gynecologic surgery: When, why, and how

Complications after vaginal hysterectomy

A woman underwent laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with anterior and posterior repair using mesh in August 2010. Shortly after surgery, the patient reported vaginal discharge with pain and bleeding. She was treated with antibiotics. Results of a CT scan identified the cause of her symptoms as vaginal cuff granulations. 

Her pain continued and in June 2011, she underwent vaginal tissue biopsy. After testing revealed the presence of fecal matter, a small-bowel vaginal fistula was identified. She underwent laparoscopic enterectomy, urethral lysis, an omental pedicle flap, and cystoscopy. The mesh had perforated several loops of the small bowel.

In August 2011, the patient reported spinal pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a new fluid abscess in a disc extending through the tract anterior to the soft tissue of the pelvis. She underwent intensive antibiotic therapy. 

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The gynecologic surgeon fell below the standard of care in his treatment of her conditions.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE:

The surgeon denied allegations.

VERDICT:

A Nevada defense verdict was returned.

Related article:
Vaginal hysterectomy with basic instrumentation

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Blood vessels injured during trocar insertion: $8.7M verdict

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The resident was negligent in performing trocar insertion during laparoscopic surgery by inserting the trocar too far into the abdomen. The attending ObGyn did not supervise the resident properly. There is nothing in the patient's medical records to indicate that she had abnormal anatomy. The woman's life is in turmoil after what was supposed to be a routine procedure.

DEFENDANTS' DEFENSE:

There was no negligence. The patient's anatomy was abnormal, making the risk of surgery higher. The injury is a known complication of laparoscopic surgery.

VERDICT:

An $8,718,848 Illinois verdict was returned.

Related article:
How to avoid major vessel injury during gynecologic laparoscopy

Wrong fallopian tube transected: $1.8M award

A 28-year-old woman underwent an appendectomy. During the operation, the surgeon saw an abscess on the patient's right fallopian tube and called in an ObGyn to remove the abscess. While doing so, the ObGyn transected the left fallopian tube. Both fallopian tubes were removed.

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The surgeon did not tell the ObGyn which fallopian tube was abscessed and therefore the ObGyn operated on the wrong tube. In addition, the surgeon failed to obtain informed consent for bilateral salpingectomy. The patient is now unable to conceive without assisted reproductive treatment.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE:

The surgeon admitted his mistakes but disputed the informed consent claim. The patient probably would not have been able to conceive naturally due to the infection.

VERDICT:

A $1.8 million Connecticut verdict was returned.

Related article:
Elective laparoscopic appendectomy in gynecologic surgery: When, why, and how

Complications after vaginal hysterectomy

A woman underwent laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with anterior and posterior repair using mesh in August 2010. Shortly after surgery, the patient reported vaginal discharge with pain and bleeding. She was treated with antibiotics. Results of a CT scan identified the cause of her symptoms as vaginal cuff granulations. 

Her pain continued and in June 2011, she underwent vaginal tissue biopsy. After testing revealed the presence of fecal matter, a small-bowel vaginal fistula was identified. She underwent laparoscopic enterectomy, urethral lysis, an omental pedicle flap, and cystoscopy. The mesh had perforated several loops of the small bowel.

In August 2011, the patient reported spinal pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a new fluid abscess in a disc extending through the tract anterior to the soft tissue of the pelvis. She underwent intensive antibiotic therapy. 

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The gynecologic surgeon fell below the standard of care in his treatment of her conditions.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE:

The surgeon denied allegations.

VERDICT:

A Nevada defense verdict was returned.

Related article:
Vaginal hysterectomy with basic instrumentation

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Blood vessels injured during trocar insertion: $8.7M verdict

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The resident was negligent in performing trocar insertion during laparoscopic surgery by inserting the trocar too far into the abdomen. The attending ObGyn did not supervise the resident properly. There is nothing in the patient's medical records to indicate that she had abnormal anatomy. The woman's life is in turmoil after what was supposed to be a routine procedure.

DEFENDANTS' DEFENSE:

There was no negligence. The patient's anatomy was abnormal, making the risk of surgery higher. The injury is a known complication of laparoscopic surgery.

VERDICT:

An $8,718,848 Illinois verdict was returned.

Related article:
How to avoid major vessel injury during gynecologic laparoscopy

Wrong fallopian tube transected: $1.8M award

A 28-year-old woman underwent an appendectomy. During the operation, the surgeon saw an abscess on the patient's right fallopian tube and called in an ObGyn to remove the abscess. While doing so, the ObGyn transected the left fallopian tube. Both fallopian tubes were removed.

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The surgeon did not tell the ObGyn which fallopian tube was abscessed and therefore the ObGyn operated on the wrong tube. In addition, the surgeon failed to obtain informed consent for bilateral salpingectomy. The patient is now unable to conceive without assisted reproductive treatment.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE:

The surgeon admitted his mistakes but disputed the informed consent claim. The patient probably would not have been able to conceive naturally due to the infection.

VERDICT:

A $1.8 million Connecticut verdict was returned.

Related article:
Elective laparoscopic appendectomy in gynecologic surgery: When, why, and how

Complications after vaginal hysterectomy

A woman underwent laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with anterior and posterior repair using mesh in August 2010. Shortly after surgery, the patient reported vaginal discharge with pain and bleeding. She was treated with antibiotics. Results of a CT scan identified the cause of her symptoms as vaginal cuff granulations. 

Her pain continued and in June 2011, she underwent vaginal tissue biopsy. After testing revealed the presence of fecal matter, a small-bowel vaginal fistula was identified. She underwent laparoscopic enterectomy, urethral lysis, an omental pedicle flap, and cystoscopy. The mesh had perforated several loops of the small bowel.

In August 2011, the patient reported spinal pain. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a new fluid abscess in a disc extending through the tract anterior to the soft tissue of the pelvis. She underwent intensive antibiotic therapy. 

PATIENT’S CLAIM:

The gynecologic surgeon fell below the standard of care in his treatment of her conditions.

PHYSICIAN’S DEFENSE:

The surgeon denied allegations.

VERDICT:

A Nevada defense verdict was returned.

Related article:
Vaginal hysterectomy with basic instrumentation

These cases were selected by the editors of OBG Management from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts, with permission of the editor, Lewis Laska (www.verdictslaska.com). The information available to the editors about the cases presented here is sometimes incomplete. Moreover, the cases may or may not have merit. Nevertheless, these cases represent the types of clinical situations that typically result in litigation and are meant to illustrate nationwide variation in jury verdicts and awards.

Share your thoughts! Send your Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

States that expanded Medicaid in 2014 both increased and decreased their Medicaid spending that year, compared with the nonexpansion states, according to an analysis from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

The 26 states, along with the District of Columbia, that expanded Medicaid eligibility by the end of 2014 had an increase in total Medicaid spending of 12.3% over 2013, compared with an increase of 6.2% in nonexpansion states.

[email protected]

States that expanded Medicaid in 2014 both increased and decreased their Medicaid spending that year, compared with the nonexpansion states, according to an analysis from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

The 26 states, along with the District of Columbia, that expanded Medicaid eligibility by the end of 2014 had an increase in total Medicaid spending of 12.3% over 2013, compared with an increase of 6.2% in nonexpansion states.

[email protected]

States that expanded Medicaid in 2014 both increased and decreased their Medicaid spending that year, compared with the nonexpansion states, according to an analysis from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

The 26 states, along with the District of Columbia, that expanded Medicaid eligibility by the end of 2014 had an increase in total Medicaid spending of 12.3% over 2013, compared with an increase of 6.2% in nonexpansion states.

[email protected]