Brown spots on face

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 08:49
Display Headline
Brown spots on face

The results of a 4-mm punch biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of actinic lichen planus. As the name implies, this form of lichen planus occurs in areas of sun exposure. Treatment is the same as for other forms of lichen planus, with the addition of avoiding the sun.

The FP counseled the patient about the use of sunscreen and avoiding sun exposure as much as possible. The FP then prescribed a mid-potency topical corticosteroid, 0.1% triamcinolone cream. (A low-potency steroid is unlikely to be beneficial.) In cases like this one, a short course of a mid-potency steroid should be safe on the face without causing atrophy.

At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the appearance of the patient’s face and hands. The patient was pleased with these results and said she’d been more careful with sun exposure. The FP prescribed 2.5% hydrocortisone cream to be used on the face as needed, in conjunction with the continued use of triamcinolone on the hands as needed.

 

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Kraft RL, Usatine R. Lichen planus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 901-909.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 66(10)
Publications
Topics
Sections

The results of a 4-mm punch biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of actinic lichen planus. As the name implies, this form of lichen planus occurs in areas of sun exposure. Treatment is the same as for other forms of lichen planus, with the addition of avoiding the sun.

The FP counseled the patient about the use of sunscreen and avoiding sun exposure as much as possible. The FP then prescribed a mid-potency topical corticosteroid, 0.1% triamcinolone cream. (A low-potency steroid is unlikely to be beneficial.) In cases like this one, a short course of a mid-potency steroid should be safe on the face without causing atrophy.

At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the appearance of the patient’s face and hands. The patient was pleased with these results and said she’d been more careful with sun exposure. The FP prescribed 2.5% hydrocortisone cream to be used on the face as needed, in conjunction with the continued use of triamcinolone on the hands as needed.

 

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Kraft RL, Usatine R. Lichen planus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 901-909.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

The results of a 4-mm punch biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of actinic lichen planus. As the name implies, this form of lichen planus occurs in areas of sun exposure. Treatment is the same as for other forms of lichen planus, with the addition of avoiding the sun.

The FP counseled the patient about the use of sunscreen and avoiding sun exposure as much as possible. The FP then prescribed a mid-potency topical corticosteroid, 0.1% triamcinolone cream. (A low-potency steroid is unlikely to be beneficial.) In cases like this one, a short course of a mid-potency steroid should be safe on the face without causing atrophy.

At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the appearance of the patient’s face and hands. The patient was pleased with these results and said she’d been more careful with sun exposure. The FP prescribed 2.5% hydrocortisone cream to be used on the face as needed, in conjunction with the continued use of triamcinolone on the hands as needed.

 

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Kraft RL, Usatine R. Lichen planus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 901-909.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 66(10)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 66(10)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Brown spots on face
Display Headline
Brown spots on face
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Novel picosecond laser improves acne scarring

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 10:11

 

Novel picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers used with a new holographic beam splitter safely and effectively treated facial acne scars in a prospective study.

Among the 27 participants who completed the study, the mean improvement in acne scarring was 1.4 on a 10-point global aesthetic scale (range –4 to 6 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.9); these assessments were performed by three blinded physician reviewers 12 weeks after the last treatment. In addition, 23 (85%) of the participants reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment, Eric F. Bernstein, MD, who is in private practice in Ardmore, Pa., and his coauthors reported (Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Nov;49[9]:796-802).

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Novel picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers used with a new holographic beam splitter safely and effectively treated facial acne scars in a prospective study.

Among the 27 participants who completed the study, the mean improvement in acne scarring was 1.4 on a 10-point global aesthetic scale (range –4 to 6 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.9); these assessments were performed by three blinded physician reviewers 12 weeks after the last treatment. In addition, 23 (85%) of the participants reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment, Eric F. Bernstein, MD, who is in private practice in Ardmore, Pa., and his coauthors reported (Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Nov;49[9]:796-802).

 

Novel picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers used with a new holographic beam splitter safely and effectively treated facial acne scars in a prospective study.

Among the 27 participants who completed the study, the mean improvement in acne scarring was 1.4 on a 10-point global aesthetic scale (range –4 to 6 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.9); these assessments were performed by three blinded physician reviewers 12 weeks after the last treatment. In addition, 23 (85%) of the participants reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment, Eric F. Bernstein, MD, who is in private practice in Ardmore, Pa., and his coauthors reported (Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Nov;49[9]:796-802).

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: A new picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm Nd:YAG laser combined with a novel holographic beam splitter can treat facial acne scars safely and effectively.

Major finding: All 27 participants who completed the study saw a mean improvement in acne scarring of 1.4 on a 10-point scale, with improvement ranging up to 60%.

Data source: A prospective study of participants with facial acne scars who were treated with four monthly laser treatments.

Disclosures: The study was funded by Syneron Candela, the manufacturer of the laser and the holographic beam-splitting optic used in the study; the company loaned the equipment for the study. Dr. Bernstein is a consultant for Syneron Candela. Two of the five authors were employees of Syneron Candela at the time the study was conducted. No other financial disclosures were reported.

Disqus Comments
Default

In close vote, advisory panel prefers Shingrix over Zostavax

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:07

 

Herpes zoster subunit vaccine (Shingrix) was preferentially recommended over zoster vaccine live (Zostavax) for preventing herpes zoster and related complications Oct. 25 at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Eight committee members voted for the recommendation, and seven voted against it.

After the decision, ACIP Chair Nancy Bennett, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), noted that it was the “closest vote” in her term as chair of the committee, which provides advice and recommendations on vaccine-preventable diseases to the CDC.

In discussions leading up to the vote, some committee members cited potential supply issues, as well as the need for longer-term safety data, among other issues.

“I think it would be nice to see data on a larger population that is not just research-based, especially because we have very little data on ethnic minorities,” said Laura E. Riley, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, who voted against the recommendation.

The vote comes several days after GlaxoSmithKline announced the Food and Drug Administration approval of Shingrix for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in adults aged 50 years or older. In pooled clinical trial results, the vaccine demonstrated greater than 90% efficacy in all age groups, according to a company statement.

Shingrix is a non-live, recombinant subunit vaccine that is given in two doses, intramuscularly. Zostavax, also indicated in individuals aged 50 years or older, is a live attenuated virus vaccine.

In a related decision, ACIP voted 14-1 to recommend Shingrix for prevention of herpes zoster and related complications for immunocompetent adults aged 50 years and older.

They also voted 12-3 to recommend Shingrix to prevent herpes zoster and its complications for immunocompetent adults who previously received Zostavax.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

Herpes zoster subunit vaccine (Shingrix) was preferentially recommended over zoster vaccine live (Zostavax) for preventing herpes zoster and related complications Oct. 25 at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Eight committee members voted for the recommendation, and seven voted against it.

After the decision, ACIP Chair Nancy Bennett, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), noted that it was the “closest vote” in her term as chair of the committee, which provides advice and recommendations on vaccine-preventable diseases to the CDC.

In discussions leading up to the vote, some committee members cited potential supply issues, as well as the need for longer-term safety data, among other issues.

“I think it would be nice to see data on a larger population that is not just research-based, especially because we have very little data on ethnic minorities,” said Laura E. Riley, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, who voted against the recommendation.

The vote comes several days after GlaxoSmithKline announced the Food and Drug Administration approval of Shingrix for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in adults aged 50 years or older. In pooled clinical trial results, the vaccine demonstrated greater than 90% efficacy in all age groups, according to a company statement.

Shingrix is a non-live, recombinant subunit vaccine that is given in two doses, intramuscularly. Zostavax, also indicated in individuals aged 50 years or older, is a live attenuated virus vaccine.

In a related decision, ACIP voted 14-1 to recommend Shingrix for prevention of herpes zoster and related complications for immunocompetent adults aged 50 years and older.

They also voted 12-3 to recommend Shingrix to prevent herpes zoster and its complications for immunocompetent adults who previously received Zostavax.

 

Herpes zoster subunit vaccine (Shingrix) was preferentially recommended over zoster vaccine live (Zostavax) for preventing herpes zoster and related complications Oct. 25 at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Eight committee members voted for the recommendation, and seven voted against it.

After the decision, ACIP Chair Nancy Bennett, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Rochester (N.Y.), noted that it was the “closest vote” in her term as chair of the committee, which provides advice and recommendations on vaccine-preventable diseases to the CDC.

In discussions leading up to the vote, some committee members cited potential supply issues, as well as the need for longer-term safety data, among other issues.

“I think it would be nice to see data on a larger population that is not just research-based, especially because we have very little data on ethnic minorities,” said Laura E. Riley, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, who voted against the recommendation.

The vote comes several days after GlaxoSmithKline announced the Food and Drug Administration approval of Shingrix for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in adults aged 50 years or older. In pooled clinical trial results, the vaccine demonstrated greater than 90% efficacy in all age groups, according to a company statement.

Shingrix is a non-live, recombinant subunit vaccine that is given in two doses, intramuscularly. Zostavax, also indicated in individuals aged 50 years or older, is a live attenuated virus vaccine.

In a related decision, ACIP voted 14-1 to recommend Shingrix for prevention of herpes zoster and related complications for immunocompetent adults aged 50 years and older.

They also voted 12-3 to recommend Shingrix to prevent herpes zoster and its complications for immunocompetent adults who previously received Zostavax.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM AN ACIP MEETING

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Yoga benefits lung cancer patients and caregivers alike

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 13:42

 

Yoga provides physical and mental benefits for both lung cancer patients and their caregivers, according to results of a randomized study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

iStock
“We demonstrated that patients undergoing treatment for lung cancer are not too sick to participate in a behavioral supportive care intervention,” Dr. Milbury said in a press conference. “Both patients and caregivers reported to have enjoyed the experience, and it gave them a time away from cancer, and [they] learned something new together.”

This study provides preliminary evidence that a yoga program can provide a “buffer” and improve physical function for patients, as well as self-reported improved quality of life for both patients and their caregivers, she added.

All patients in the study had non–small cell lung cancer and were undergoing thoracic radiation therapy, which can cause respiratory toxicities that negatively affect quality of life and physical activity, according to Dr. Milbury and her coinvestigators.

A total of 32 patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to participate in 15 yoga sessions or to be in a “wait-list” control group, and 26 dyads completed all assessments.

Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.

Almost all patients (96%) rated the program as “very useful,” investigators reported at the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.

This study provides additional evidence that yoga and other nonpharmacologic supportive therapies “can be integrated into not only the care of cancer patients, but also the family caregivers who support them,” according to Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

Next, the researchers plan to conduct a larger, randomized, controlled trial with a more stringent comparison group, according to Dr. Milbury.

Body

This is an interesting study further supporting the benefits of yoga and meditation when dealing with a chronic illness such as lung cancer. The benefits included reducing stress and improving quality of life, not only for the patient but also the caregiver.

Dr. M. Patricia Rivera

Name
M. Patricia Rivera, MD, FCCP, comments on yoga
Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Body

This is an interesting study further supporting the benefits of yoga and meditation when dealing with a chronic illness such as lung cancer. The benefits included reducing stress and improving quality of life, not only for the patient but also the caregiver.

Dr. M. Patricia Rivera

Body

This is an interesting study further supporting the benefits of yoga and meditation when dealing with a chronic illness such as lung cancer. The benefits included reducing stress and improving quality of life, not only for the patient but also the caregiver.

Dr. M. Patricia Rivera

Name
M. Patricia Rivera, MD, FCCP, comments on yoga
Name
M. Patricia Rivera, MD, FCCP, comments on yoga

 

Yoga provides physical and mental benefits for both lung cancer patients and their caregivers, according to results of a randomized study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

iStock
“We demonstrated that patients undergoing treatment for lung cancer are not too sick to participate in a behavioral supportive care intervention,” Dr. Milbury said in a press conference. “Both patients and caregivers reported to have enjoyed the experience, and it gave them a time away from cancer, and [they] learned something new together.”

This study provides preliminary evidence that a yoga program can provide a “buffer” and improve physical function for patients, as well as self-reported improved quality of life for both patients and their caregivers, she added.

All patients in the study had non–small cell lung cancer and were undergoing thoracic radiation therapy, which can cause respiratory toxicities that negatively affect quality of life and physical activity, according to Dr. Milbury and her coinvestigators.

A total of 32 patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to participate in 15 yoga sessions or to be in a “wait-list” control group, and 26 dyads completed all assessments.

Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.

Almost all patients (96%) rated the program as “very useful,” investigators reported at the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.

This study provides additional evidence that yoga and other nonpharmacologic supportive therapies “can be integrated into not only the care of cancer patients, but also the family caregivers who support them,” according to Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

Next, the researchers plan to conduct a larger, randomized, controlled trial with a more stringent comparison group, according to Dr. Milbury.

 

Yoga provides physical and mental benefits for both lung cancer patients and their caregivers, according to results of a randomized study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

iStock
“We demonstrated that patients undergoing treatment for lung cancer are not too sick to participate in a behavioral supportive care intervention,” Dr. Milbury said in a press conference. “Both patients and caregivers reported to have enjoyed the experience, and it gave them a time away from cancer, and [they] learned something new together.”

This study provides preliminary evidence that a yoga program can provide a “buffer” and improve physical function for patients, as well as self-reported improved quality of life for both patients and their caregivers, she added.

All patients in the study had non–small cell lung cancer and were undergoing thoracic radiation therapy, which can cause respiratory toxicities that negatively affect quality of life and physical activity, according to Dr. Milbury and her coinvestigators.

A total of 32 patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to participate in 15 yoga sessions or to be in a “wait-list” control group, and 26 dyads completed all assessments.

Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.

Almost all patients (96%) rated the program as “very useful,” investigators reported at the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.

This study provides additional evidence that yoga and other nonpharmacologic supportive therapies “can be integrated into not only the care of cancer patients, but also the family caregivers who support them,” according to Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

Next, the researchers plan to conduct a larger, randomized, controlled trial with a more stringent comparison group, according to Dr. Milbury.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM PALLONC 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Yoga provides both physical and mental benefits for lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and their caregivers.

Major finding: Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.

Data source: Randomized study including 47 patient-caregiver dyads, of which 32 consented and 26 completed all assessments.

Disclosures: Funding for this study came from the National Institutes of Health. Lead author Kathrin Milbury, PhD, reported no potential conflicts of interest.

Disqus Comments
Default

VIDEO: When surgery hurts the surgeon: Intervening to prevent ergonomic injuries

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 08/06/2021 - 17:00

– Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are practically inevitable for surgeons, eventually occurring in more than 90%, no matter what type of surgery they practice.

At the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, this eyebrow-raising fact was presented with a sobering addendum: No one seems to be doing much about it.

“There are some ergonomic guidelines for surgeons out there, but most surgeons don’t know about them,” said Tatiana Catanzarite, MD, who has conducted research on this topic. When she began looking into the problem of work-related injuries among surgeons, she was surprised at the dearth of published research. It’s no wonder then, said Dr. Catanzarite and other panel members, that most surgeons learn proper work posture on the fly and may or may not be using the most efficient and mechanically sound instrumentation angles when performing surgery.
 

Dr. Catanzarite, a female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego, has just published a literature review on surgeon ergonomics. But reading about how to stand, how to hold instruments, and even how to sit at a robotic surgical console is no match for having an observer on the ground guiding and reinforcing work posture, she said. Unfortunately, that’s an unrealistic expectation for most surgeons, so Dr. Catanzarite is borrowing video-gaming technology to address the situation, she said in an interview.

She has adapted a popular video game motion-capture system that uses an infrared laser projector and a computer sensor to capture video data in three dimensions. The sensing range of the depth sensor is adjustable, and the software is capable of automatically calibrating the sensor based on the physical environment, accommodating the presence of obstacles and using infrared and depth cameras to capture a subject’s 3-D movements. The system doesn’t require bulky wearable components, “making it an ideal technology for the live operating room setting,” Dr. Catanzarite said. “In order to effectively assess surgical ergonomics, a less intrusive approach is needed, which can deliver precise reports on the body movements of the surgeons, as well as capturing the temporal distribution of different postures and limb angles.”

Dr. Catanzarite is using the system to launch an ergonomics assessment tool she calls Ergo-Kinect. The system will record surgeons’ movements in real time, gathering data about how they stand, move, and operate their instruments.

“Three-D interactive visualizations allow us to rotate and investigate specific motor activities from the collected data,” she said. The technology enables them to capture the movements of the surgeon and assign an ergonomic score for each movement. “Eventually we may be able to develop a system that can warn surgeons in real time if they are performing an activity which may be harmful from an ergonomics standpoint,” Dr. Catanzarite said.

The research is in its earliest phase – Dr. Catanzarite has only scanned a few surgeons. But she will continue to accrue data in order to eventually construct a system that could help surgeons of the future avoid the painful, and sometimes debilitating, physical costs of their career.

Dr. Catanzarite reported having no financial disclosures.
 

 

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

– Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are practically inevitable for surgeons, eventually occurring in more than 90%, no matter what type of surgery they practice.

At the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, this eyebrow-raising fact was presented with a sobering addendum: No one seems to be doing much about it.

“There are some ergonomic guidelines for surgeons out there, but most surgeons don’t know about them,” said Tatiana Catanzarite, MD, who has conducted research on this topic. When she began looking into the problem of work-related injuries among surgeons, she was surprised at the dearth of published research. It’s no wonder then, said Dr. Catanzarite and other panel members, that most surgeons learn proper work posture on the fly and may or may not be using the most efficient and mechanically sound instrumentation angles when performing surgery.
 

Dr. Catanzarite, a female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego, has just published a literature review on surgeon ergonomics. But reading about how to stand, how to hold instruments, and even how to sit at a robotic surgical console is no match for having an observer on the ground guiding and reinforcing work posture, she said. Unfortunately, that’s an unrealistic expectation for most surgeons, so Dr. Catanzarite is borrowing video-gaming technology to address the situation, she said in an interview.

She has adapted a popular video game motion-capture system that uses an infrared laser projector and a computer sensor to capture video data in three dimensions. The sensing range of the depth sensor is adjustable, and the software is capable of automatically calibrating the sensor based on the physical environment, accommodating the presence of obstacles and using infrared and depth cameras to capture a subject’s 3-D movements. The system doesn’t require bulky wearable components, “making it an ideal technology for the live operating room setting,” Dr. Catanzarite said. “In order to effectively assess surgical ergonomics, a less intrusive approach is needed, which can deliver precise reports on the body movements of the surgeons, as well as capturing the temporal distribution of different postures and limb angles.”

Dr. Catanzarite is using the system to launch an ergonomics assessment tool she calls Ergo-Kinect. The system will record surgeons’ movements in real time, gathering data about how they stand, move, and operate their instruments.

“Three-D interactive visualizations allow us to rotate and investigate specific motor activities from the collected data,” she said. The technology enables them to capture the movements of the surgeon and assign an ergonomic score for each movement. “Eventually we may be able to develop a system that can warn surgeons in real time if they are performing an activity which may be harmful from an ergonomics standpoint,” Dr. Catanzarite said.

The research is in its earliest phase – Dr. Catanzarite has only scanned a few surgeons. But she will continue to accrue data in order to eventually construct a system that could help surgeons of the future avoid the painful, and sometimes debilitating, physical costs of their career.

Dr. Catanzarite reported having no financial disclosures.
 

 

– Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are practically inevitable for surgeons, eventually occurring in more than 90%, no matter what type of surgery they practice.

At the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, this eyebrow-raising fact was presented with a sobering addendum: No one seems to be doing much about it.

“There are some ergonomic guidelines for surgeons out there, but most surgeons don’t know about them,” said Tatiana Catanzarite, MD, who has conducted research on this topic. When she began looking into the problem of work-related injuries among surgeons, she was surprised at the dearth of published research. It’s no wonder then, said Dr. Catanzarite and other panel members, that most surgeons learn proper work posture on the fly and may or may not be using the most efficient and mechanically sound instrumentation angles when performing surgery.
 

Dr. Catanzarite, a female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego, has just published a literature review on surgeon ergonomics. But reading about how to stand, how to hold instruments, and even how to sit at a robotic surgical console is no match for having an observer on the ground guiding and reinforcing work posture, she said. Unfortunately, that’s an unrealistic expectation for most surgeons, so Dr. Catanzarite is borrowing video-gaming technology to address the situation, she said in an interview.

She has adapted a popular video game motion-capture system that uses an infrared laser projector and a computer sensor to capture video data in three dimensions. The sensing range of the depth sensor is adjustable, and the software is capable of automatically calibrating the sensor based on the physical environment, accommodating the presence of obstacles and using infrared and depth cameras to capture a subject’s 3-D movements. The system doesn’t require bulky wearable components, “making it an ideal technology for the live operating room setting,” Dr. Catanzarite said. “In order to effectively assess surgical ergonomics, a less intrusive approach is needed, which can deliver precise reports on the body movements of the surgeons, as well as capturing the temporal distribution of different postures and limb angles.”

Dr. Catanzarite is using the system to launch an ergonomics assessment tool she calls Ergo-Kinect. The system will record surgeons’ movements in real time, gathering data about how they stand, move, and operate their instruments.

“Three-D interactive visualizations allow us to rotate and investigate specific motor activities from the collected data,” she said. The technology enables them to capture the movements of the surgeon and assign an ergonomic score for each movement. “Eventually we may be able to develop a system that can warn surgeons in real time if they are performing an activity which may be harmful from an ergonomics standpoint,” Dr. Catanzarite said.

The research is in its earliest phase – Dr. Catanzarite has only scanned a few surgeons. But she will continue to accrue data in order to eventually construct a system that could help surgeons of the future avoid the painful, and sometimes debilitating, physical costs of their career.

Dr. Catanzarite reported having no financial disclosures.
 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ACS CLINICAL CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

AML patients overestimate treatment risk and chance of cure

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/04/2019 - 10:11

 

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

 

Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM PALLONC 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients overestimated both the risks of treatment and the chances of cure, compared with estimates from their own oncologists.

Major finding: Ninety-one percent of patients thought it was somewhat or extremely likely they would die from the treatment, while only 22% of oncologists said it was somewhat likely. A month later, 90% of patients thought it was somewhat or very likely they would be cured of their AML, but only 26% of oncologists said cure was somewhat likely.

Data source: A longitudinal study including 100 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated at one of two tertiary hospitals.

Disclosures: This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default

Still too early to determine impact of 1-year deferral for MSM blood donors

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:07

 

– It’s still too early to assess the impact of new guidelines for blood donation by men who have had sex with men, Brian S. Custer, PhD, MPH, of Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Blood Banks.

In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its lifetime ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men (MSM) and changed it to a 1-year deferral policy. Based on this new guidance, many U.S. blood centers moved from an indefinite deferral for any man who reported having had sex with a man since 1977 to a 1-year deferral from last sexual contact with a man.

blueskyline/Thinkstock
“The implementation of the 1-year policy has been in place for over a year now,” said Dr. Custer. “The rates for MSM deferral have declined, as expected. A small proportion have been reinstated and have donated multiple times and repeat donors have had negative infectious markers.”

In their study, Dr. Custer and his colleagues assessed the impact of the change in policy on donors and whether there was any early evidence of a change in risk to blood recipients.

At their center, the 1-year deferral was implemented on Aug. 29, 2016. On the health questionnaire that potential donors must complete, males are now asked two questions – one regarding sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and another about sex with men since 1977.

The rates of deferral were evaluated in two 7-month periods before and after the policy change (September 2015-March 2016 and September 2016-March 2017). They also looked at donor requests to be reinstated in lieu of the new policy, along with infectious disease marker test results in accepted donors.

In 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, 408 men responded yes to having sex with men since 1977 and 370 were deferred.

For the 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, 245 men answered yes to having sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and 245 were deferred.

Some of the men who reported having sex with men before the policy change were evaluated and accepted as donors. Overall, the donor acceptance rate was 9.3% during the period before the policy change, and 64.2% for the period after the policy change.

“Only 67 men requested to be reinstated and have been reinstated, and 39 returned to donate. There have been 59 successful donations to date,” said Dr. Custer.

Some of the reinstated donors were deferred for reasons similar to those for deferral of donors who are not men who have sex with men. Although it is still too early to draw any conclusions, Dr. Custer noted that they are being cautious, because infectious markers still are running a little higher among male donors with a history of having sex with men and donors without such a history.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– It’s still too early to assess the impact of new guidelines for blood donation by men who have had sex with men, Brian S. Custer, PhD, MPH, of Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Blood Banks.

In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its lifetime ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men (MSM) and changed it to a 1-year deferral policy. Based on this new guidance, many U.S. blood centers moved from an indefinite deferral for any man who reported having had sex with a man since 1977 to a 1-year deferral from last sexual contact with a man.

blueskyline/Thinkstock
“The implementation of the 1-year policy has been in place for over a year now,” said Dr. Custer. “The rates for MSM deferral have declined, as expected. A small proportion have been reinstated and have donated multiple times and repeat donors have had negative infectious markers.”

In their study, Dr. Custer and his colleagues assessed the impact of the change in policy on donors and whether there was any early evidence of a change in risk to blood recipients.

At their center, the 1-year deferral was implemented on Aug. 29, 2016. On the health questionnaire that potential donors must complete, males are now asked two questions – one regarding sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and another about sex with men since 1977.

The rates of deferral were evaluated in two 7-month periods before and after the policy change (September 2015-March 2016 and September 2016-March 2017). They also looked at donor requests to be reinstated in lieu of the new policy, along with infectious disease marker test results in accepted donors.

In 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, 408 men responded yes to having sex with men since 1977 and 370 were deferred.

For the 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, 245 men answered yes to having sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and 245 were deferred.

Some of the men who reported having sex with men before the policy change were evaluated and accepted as donors. Overall, the donor acceptance rate was 9.3% during the period before the policy change, and 64.2% for the period after the policy change.

“Only 67 men requested to be reinstated and have been reinstated, and 39 returned to donate. There have been 59 successful donations to date,” said Dr. Custer.

Some of the reinstated donors were deferred for reasons similar to those for deferral of donors who are not men who have sex with men. Although it is still too early to draw any conclusions, Dr. Custer noted that they are being cautious, because infectious markers still are running a little higher among male donors with a history of having sex with men and donors without such a history.

 

– It’s still too early to assess the impact of new guidelines for blood donation by men who have had sex with men, Brian S. Custer, PhD, MPH, of Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Blood Banks.

In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its lifetime ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men (MSM) and changed it to a 1-year deferral policy. Based on this new guidance, many U.S. blood centers moved from an indefinite deferral for any man who reported having had sex with a man since 1977 to a 1-year deferral from last sexual contact with a man.

blueskyline/Thinkstock
“The implementation of the 1-year policy has been in place for over a year now,” said Dr. Custer. “The rates for MSM deferral have declined, as expected. A small proportion have been reinstated and have donated multiple times and repeat donors have had negative infectious markers.”

In their study, Dr. Custer and his colleagues assessed the impact of the change in policy on donors and whether there was any early evidence of a change in risk to blood recipients.

At their center, the 1-year deferral was implemented on Aug. 29, 2016. On the health questionnaire that potential donors must complete, males are now asked two questions – one regarding sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and another about sex with men since 1977.

The rates of deferral were evaluated in two 7-month periods before and after the policy change (September 2015-March 2016 and September 2016-March 2017). They also looked at donor requests to be reinstated in lieu of the new policy, along with infectious disease marker test results in accepted donors.

In 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, 408 men responded yes to having sex with men since 1977 and 370 were deferred.

For the 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, 245 men answered yes to having sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and 245 were deferred.

Some of the men who reported having sex with men before the policy change were evaluated and accepted as donors. Overall, the donor acceptance rate was 9.3% during the period before the policy change, and 64.2% for the period after the policy change.

“Only 67 men requested to be reinstated and have been reinstated, and 39 returned to donate. There have been 59 successful donations to date,” said Dr. Custer.

Some of the reinstated donors were deferred for reasons similar to those for deferral of donors who are not men who have sex with men. Although it is still too early to draw any conclusions, Dr. Custer noted that they are being cautious, because infectious markers still are running a little higher among male donors with a history of having sex with men and donors without such a history.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT AABB2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: It’s too early to determine whether there are infectious disease risks as a result of the new guideline advising blood donation deferral for men who have had sex with men in the last year.

Major finding: Of 370 men deferred for blood donation because of ever having sex with a man since 1977, 67 have requested to be reinstated as donors under the new 1-year deferral policy and 39 returned to donate blood.

Data source: 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, and 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, at Blood Systems Research Institute.

Disclosures: Dr. Custer had no relevant financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default

Oligoclonal Bands Could Be a Valuable Criterion for the Diagnosis of MS

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/16/2019 - 15:41
The presence of oligoclonal bands increases the likelihood of second attack after CIS.

PARIS—Oligoclonal bands, together with symptomatic lesions disseminated in space, increase the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. MRI dissemination in space (DIS) at any time plus positive oligoclonal bands should be considered as an additional criterion for MS diagnosis, according to the researchers.

Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD

Previous research has suggested that the presence of oligoclonal bands in typical clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) increases the risk of a second attack independently of MRI findings. Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD, a neurologist at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, and colleagues studied an ongoing CIS cohort to explore whether oligoclonal bands would be a valuable criterion for MS diagnosis in the context of the 2010 McDonald criteria.

An Examination of MRIs

The investigators obtained MRIs at three to five months after CIS diagnosis, at one year, and at every five years. Oligoclonal bands were determined by isoelectric focusing combined with immunoblotting. Dr. Arrambide and colleagues selected 565 patients with oligoclonal band determination and sufficient data on baseline brain MRI to assess 2010 DIS and dissemination in time (DIT) considering the symptomatic lesions. They excluded 167 participants (29.6%) who already fulfilled DIS and DIT criteria and divided the remaining 398 participants into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 218), DIS only (n = 164), and DIT only (n = 16).

Next, the researchers performed Cox proportional hazards regression models with 2010 McDonald as the outcome, using no DIS no DIT with no lesions (n = 107) as the reference for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion, DIS only, and DIT only. To assess performance, Dr. Arrambide’s group selected cases with a follow-up of three or more years or a second attack within three years of the CIS (n = 305). These participants were divided into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 165), DIS only (n = 129), and DIT only (n = 11). The investigators classified participants with no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion (n = 93) and DIS only according to their oligoclonal band status. They assessed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with 2010 McDonald at three years as the outcome.

Oligoclonal Bands Increased Risk of Conversion to MS

The adjusted hazard ratios of second attack were 2.8 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 6.4 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 9.7 for DIS only with negative oligoclonal bands, 14.8 for DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands, and 7.9 for DIT only. Regarding performance, specificity was 77.6 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 89.1 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 92.5 for DIS only and negative oligoclonal bands, 88.1 for DIS only and positive oligoclonal bands, and 97.8 for DIT only. DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands had the highest sensitivity (46.2), accuracy (64.6), and positive predictive value (83.2).

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
MS, Neurology Reviews, Georgina Arrambide, oligoclonal bands, CIS
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
The presence of oligoclonal bands increases the likelihood of second attack after CIS.
The presence of oligoclonal bands increases the likelihood of second attack after CIS.

PARIS—Oligoclonal bands, together with symptomatic lesions disseminated in space, increase the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. MRI dissemination in space (DIS) at any time plus positive oligoclonal bands should be considered as an additional criterion for MS diagnosis, according to the researchers.

Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD

Previous research has suggested that the presence of oligoclonal bands in typical clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) increases the risk of a second attack independently of MRI findings. Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD, a neurologist at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, and colleagues studied an ongoing CIS cohort to explore whether oligoclonal bands would be a valuable criterion for MS diagnosis in the context of the 2010 McDonald criteria.

An Examination of MRIs

The investigators obtained MRIs at three to five months after CIS diagnosis, at one year, and at every five years. Oligoclonal bands were determined by isoelectric focusing combined with immunoblotting. Dr. Arrambide and colleagues selected 565 patients with oligoclonal band determination and sufficient data on baseline brain MRI to assess 2010 DIS and dissemination in time (DIT) considering the symptomatic lesions. They excluded 167 participants (29.6%) who already fulfilled DIS and DIT criteria and divided the remaining 398 participants into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 218), DIS only (n = 164), and DIT only (n = 16).

Next, the researchers performed Cox proportional hazards regression models with 2010 McDonald as the outcome, using no DIS no DIT with no lesions (n = 107) as the reference for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion, DIS only, and DIT only. To assess performance, Dr. Arrambide’s group selected cases with a follow-up of three or more years or a second attack within three years of the CIS (n = 305). These participants were divided into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 165), DIS only (n = 129), and DIT only (n = 11). The investigators classified participants with no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion (n = 93) and DIS only according to their oligoclonal band status. They assessed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with 2010 McDonald at three years as the outcome.

Oligoclonal Bands Increased Risk of Conversion to MS

The adjusted hazard ratios of second attack were 2.8 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 6.4 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 9.7 for DIS only with negative oligoclonal bands, 14.8 for DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands, and 7.9 for DIT only. Regarding performance, specificity was 77.6 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 89.1 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 92.5 for DIS only and negative oligoclonal bands, 88.1 for DIS only and positive oligoclonal bands, and 97.8 for DIT only. DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands had the highest sensitivity (46.2), accuracy (64.6), and positive predictive value (83.2).

PARIS—Oligoclonal bands, together with symptomatic lesions disseminated in space, increase the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. MRI dissemination in space (DIS) at any time plus positive oligoclonal bands should be considered as an additional criterion for MS diagnosis, according to the researchers.

Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD

Previous research has suggested that the presence of oligoclonal bands in typical clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) increases the risk of a second attack independently of MRI findings. Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD, a neurologist at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, and colleagues studied an ongoing CIS cohort to explore whether oligoclonal bands would be a valuable criterion for MS diagnosis in the context of the 2010 McDonald criteria.

An Examination of MRIs

The investigators obtained MRIs at three to five months after CIS diagnosis, at one year, and at every five years. Oligoclonal bands were determined by isoelectric focusing combined with immunoblotting. Dr. Arrambide and colleagues selected 565 patients with oligoclonal band determination and sufficient data on baseline brain MRI to assess 2010 DIS and dissemination in time (DIT) considering the symptomatic lesions. They excluded 167 participants (29.6%) who already fulfilled DIS and DIT criteria and divided the remaining 398 participants into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 218), DIS only (n = 164), and DIT only (n = 16).

Next, the researchers performed Cox proportional hazards regression models with 2010 McDonald as the outcome, using no DIS no DIT with no lesions (n = 107) as the reference for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion, DIS only, and DIT only. To assess performance, Dr. Arrambide’s group selected cases with a follow-up of three or more years or a second attack within three years of the CIS (n = 305). These participants were divided into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 165), DIS only (n = 129), and DIT only (n = 11). The investigators classified participants with no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion (n = 93) and DIS only according to their oligoclonal band status. They assessed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with 2010 McDonald at three years as the outcome.

Oligoclonal Bands Increased Risk of Conversion to MS

The adjusted hazard ratios of second attack were 2.8 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 6.4 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 9.7 for DIS only with negative oligoclonal bands, 14.8 for DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands, and 7.9 for DIT only. Regarding performance, specificity was 77.6 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 89.1 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 92.5 for DIS only and negative oligoclonal bands, 88.1 for DIS only and positive oligoclonal bands, and 97.8 for DIT only. DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands had the highest sensitivity (46.2), accuracy (64.6), and positive predictive value (83.2).

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Legacy Keywords
MS, Neurology Reviews, Georgina Arrambide, oligoclonal bands, CIS
Legacy Keywords
MS, Neurology Reviews, Georgina Arrambide, oligoclonal bands, CIS
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

Pre-injury statin use found to benefit survival following TBI

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:07

 

– Patients who were on statins prior to sustaining a traumatic brain injury doubled their survival rate over those who were not on the drugs in a retrospective analysis.

The study provides preliminary data that can help set a framework to conduct larger, randomized, controlled trials to further evaluate the role of statins, which have been shown in animal models to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Dr. Adil M. Lokhandwala
“According to the Department of Defense, one-third of a million veterans suffered a TBI between 2000 and 2016, while on the civilian side, about 2.5 million TBIs occur every year,” lead study author Adil M. Lokhandwala, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons. “TBI carries a high incidence, and the mortality and morbidity that comes after an event can be devastating, with sometimes long-term psychosocial consequences for the individuals involved. When it comes to therapy for TBI, currently there is none. All we have at this time is guidelines from the Brain Trauma Foundation that are mainly focused on the management of TBI. These patients have a very high incidence of schizophrenia, depression, and PTSD. These are life-long consequences. Some of the affected can’t hold a job; it can be a very morbid condition.”

In an effort to evaluate the effect of pre-injury statins on outcomes after TBI, Dr. Lokhandwala, a general surgery resident at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and his associates identified all patients aged 40 years and older from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database with a diagnosis of TBI and ICU length of stay of greater than 24 hours. They divided patients into two groups: those who were on statins and those who were not. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. Secondary outcomes measures were hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay.

Dr. Lokhandwala, who is also a commissioned officer with the U.S. Army Reserves, reported results from 918 patients with a TBI. Their mean age was 55 years, 76% were white, and 22% were on statins. The overall in-hospital survival rate was 78.6%, while the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 12. The median hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay were 9.1 and 7.2 days, respectively. The researchers observed that compared with patients who were not on statins, those on statin therapy had significantly higher rates of survival (88% vs. 68.4%; P less than .001). However, there was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay between the two groups (P = .19 and P = .39, respectively). On regression analysis after controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).

“Even though we isolated our patients to TBI, there could have been other causes of their mortality, like a pulmonary embolism or a myocardial infarction,” Dr. Lokhandwala said. “We need to conduct a randomized, controlled trial to follow these individuals and see what their actual mortality is and look at their psychosocial outcomes to see if there’s a long-term benefit to statins. Do these people have decreased incidence of PTSD or are they more functional? Is it easier for them to hold a job or develop social relationships? The impact of post-injury statin use could also be studied.”

He went on to note that many studies have shown that aggressive team-based rehabilitation can improve outcomes in TBI patients. “Would we be able to include statin use in such a program to see if statins further improve outcomes faster or are there individuals that don’t benefit as much?” Dr. Lokhandwala asked. “This study sets up a framework to show that there is a strong association, and take this further in a more structured trial to see if there is any potential for therapeutic use in TBI.”

Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Patients who were on statins prior to sustaining a traumatic brain injury doubled their survival rate over those who were not on the drugs in a retrospective analysis.

The study provides preliminary data that can help set a framework to conduct larger, randomized, controlled trials to further evaluate the role of statins, which have been shown in animal models to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Dr. Adil M. Lokhandwala
“According to the Department of Defense, one-third of a million veterans suffered a TBI between 2000 and 2016, while on the civilian side, about 2.5 million TBIs occur every year,” lead study author Adil M. Lokhandwala, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons. “TBI carries a high incidence, and the mortality and morbidity that comes after an event can be devastating, with sometimes long-term psychosocial consequences for the individuals involved. When it comes to therapy for TBI, currently there is none. All we have at this time is guidelines from the Brain Trauma Foundation that are mainly focused on the management of TBI. These patients have a very high incidence of schizophrenia, depression, and PTSD. These are life-long consequences. Some of the affected can’t hold a job; it can be a very morbid condition.”

In an effort to evaluate the effect of pre-injury statins on outcomes after TBI, Dr. Lokhandwala, a general surgery resident at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and his associates identified all patients aged 40 years and older from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database with a diagnosis of TBI and ICU length of stay of greater than 24 hours. They divided patients into two groups: those who were on statins and those who were not. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. Secondary outcomes measures were hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay.

Dr. Lokhandwala, who is also a commissioned officer with the U.S. Army Reserves, reported results from 918 patients with a TBI. Their mean age was 55 years, 76% were white, and 22% were on statins. The overall in-hospital survival rate was 78.6%, while the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 12. The median hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay were 9.1 and 7.2 days, respectively. The researchers observed that compared with patients who were not on statins, those on statin therapy had significantly higher rates of survival (88% vs. 68.4%; P less than .001). However, there was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay between the two groups (P = .19 and P = .39, respectively). On regression analysis after controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).

“Even though we isolated our patients to TBI, there could have been other causes of their mortality, like a pulmonary embolism or a myocardial infarction,” Dr. Lokhandwala said. “We need to conduct a randomized, controlled trial to follow these individuals and see what their actual mortality is and look at their psychosocial outcomes to see if there’s a long-term benefit to statins. Do these people have decreased incidence of PTSD or are they more functional? Is it easier for them to hold a job or develop social relationships? The impact of post-injury statin use could also be studied.”

He went on to note that many studies have shown that aggressive team-based rehabilitation can improve outcomes in TBI patients. “Would we be able to include statin use in such a program to see if statins further improve outcomes faster or are there individuals that don’t benefit as much?” Dr. Lokhandwala asked. “This study sets up a framework to show that there is a strong association, and take this further in a more structured trial to see if there is any potential for therapeutic use in TBI.”

Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.

 

– Patients who were on statins prior to sustaining a traumatic brain injury doubled their survival rate over those who were not on the drugs in a retrospective analysis.

The study provides preliminary data that can help set a framework to conduct larger, randomized, controlled trials to further evaluate the role of statins, which have been shown in animal models to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Dr. Adil M. Lokhandwala
“According to the Department of Defense, one-third of a million veterans suffered a TBI between 2000 and 2016, while on the civilian side, about 2.5 million TBIs occur every year,” lead study author Adil M. Lokhandwala, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons. “TBI carries a high incidence, and the mortality and morbidity that comes after an event can be devastating, with sometimes long-term psychosocial consequences for the individuals involved. When it comes to therapy for TBI, currently there is none. All we have at this time is guidelines from the Brain Trauma Foundation that are mainly focused on the management of TBI. These patients have a very high incidence of schizophrenia, depression, and PTSD. These are life-long consequences. Some of the affected can’t hold a job; it can be a very morbid condition.”

In an effort to evaluate the effect of pre-injury statins on outcomes after TBI, Dr. Lokhandwala, a general surgery resident at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and his associates identified all patients aged 40 years and older from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database with a diagnosis of TBI and ICU length of stay of greater than 24 hours. They divided patients into two groups: those who were on statins and those who were not. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. Secondary outcomes measures were hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay.

Dr. Lokhandwala, who is also a commissioned officer with the U.S. Army Reserves, reported results from 918 patients with a TBI. Their mean age was 55 years, 76% were white, and 22% were on statins. The overall in-hospital survival rate was 78.6%, while the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 12. The median hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay were 9.1 and 7.2 days, respectively. The researchers observed that compared with patients who were not on statins, those on statin therapy had significantly higher rates of survival (88% vs. 68.4%; P less than .001). However, there was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay between the two groups (P = .19 and P = .39, respectively). On regression analysis after controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).

“Even though we isolated our patients to TBI, there could have been other causes of their mortality, like a pulmonary embolism or a myocardial infarction,” Dr. Lokhandwala said. “We need to conduct a randomized, controlled trial to follow these individuals and see what their actual mortality is and look at their psychosocial outcomes to see if there’s a long-term benefit to statins. Do these people have decreased incidence of PTSD or are they more functional? Is it easier for them to hold a job or develop social relationships? The impact of post-injury statin use could also be studied.”

He went on to note that many studies have shown that aggressive team-based rehabilitation can improve outcomes in TBI patients. “Would we be able to include statin use in such a program to see if statins further improve outcomes faster or are there individuals that don’t benefit as much?” Dr. Lokhandwala asked. “This study sets up a framework to show that there is a strong association, and take this further in a more structured trial to see if there is any potential for therapeutic use in TBI.”

Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT THE ACS CLINICAL CONGRESS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Pre-injury statin use conferred a survival benefit in patients who sustained a traumatic brain injury.

Major finding: After controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival following traumatic brain injury (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).

Study details: A retrospective analysis of 918 patients who sustained a TBI.

Disclosures: Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.

Disqus Comments
Default

Only half of appropriate COPD patients get long-acting bronchodilators

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:07

 

Nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD are not being treated with recommended long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) maintenance therapy, based on study results scheduled to be presented at CHEST 2017.

Bartolome R. Celli, MD, FCCP, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues will report results based on Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoterol therapy.

The findings should stimulate further study on why clinicians overrely on short-acting rather than the recommended long-acting bronchodilators for maintenance treatment of appropriate patients, according to the researchers’ abstract. Additionally, studies should examine triggers for initiating arformoterol, and link outcomes to arformoterol monotherapy vs. combination therapy. Such analyses could help advance clinical decision making, particularly for COPD patients with a history of exacerbations and hospitalizations.

copyright designer491/Thinkstock
For the study, the researchers examined COPD patients’ therapeutic regimens for the 90 days prior to and following the start of arformoterol therapy. Patients were classed based on one of four treatment options: long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and inhaled long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs), including fixed-dose LABA and inhaled corticosteroid combinations; inhaled and nebulized corticosteroids; methylxanthines; and other medications such as short-acting bronchodilators, oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics.

Rates of medication initiation and treatment continuation or discontinuation within these classes were determined based on refill patterns following the start of arformoterol therapy. The researchers note that 42% of the patient cohort was 75 years or older, and 37% were dually eligible for Medicaid.

Overall, 46% of the cohort had received no LABD maintenance treatment in the 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol. Instead, they were being treated with a nebulized (50%) or an inhaled (37%) short-acting bronchodilator, a systemic corticosteroid (46%), and antibiotics (37%).

After starting arformoteral, 58% of beneficiaries received dual therapy. More than half of them, 52%, received LABA and inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, 6% received LAMA/LAMA therapy, and 21% received triple-therapy (LABA/LAMA plus inhaled or nebulized corticosteroids). The other 20% received only arformoterol.

After initiating arformoterol, 41% of the cohort discontinued one or more classes of their pre-arformoteral medications. The largest decrease was a 23% drop in use of corticosteroids.

Dr. Celli is scheduled to present his research on Tuesday, Oct. 31, from 2:45 to 3:00 pm in Convention Center - 602B at the CHEST annual meeting. His presentation will be part of a session entitled “COPD: Lessons for the Real-World Management of Disease,” running from 2:45 to 4:15 pm.

One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

Nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD are not being treated with recommended long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) maintenance therapy, based on study results scheduled to be presented at CHEST 2017.

Bartolome R. Celli, MD, FCCP, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues will report results based on Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoterol therapy.

The findings should stimulate further study on why clinicians overrely on short-acting rather than the recommended long-acting bronchodilators for maintenance treatment of appropriate patients, according to the researchers’ abstract. Additionally, studies should examine triggers for initiating arformoterol, and link outcomes to arformoterol monotherapy vs. combination therapy. Such analyses could help advance clinical decision making, particularly for COPD patients with a history of exacerbations and hospitalizations.

copyright designer491/Thinkstock
For the study, the researchers examined COPD patients’ therapeutic regimens for the 90 days prior to and following the start of arformoterol therapy. Patients were classed based on one of four treatment options: long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and inhaled long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs), including fixed-dose LABA and inhaled corticosteroid combinations; inhaled and nebulized corticosteroids; methylxanthines; and other medications such as short-acting bronchodilators, oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics.

Rates of medication initiation and treatment continuation or discontinuation within these classes were determined based on refill patterns following the start of arformoterol therapy. The researchers note that 42% of the patient cohort was 75 years or older, and 37% were dually eligible for Medicaid.

Overall, 46% of the cohort had received no LABD maintenance treatment in the 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol. Instead, they were being treated with a nebulized (50%) or an inhaled (37%) short-acting bronchodilator, a systemic corticosteroid (46%), and antibiotics (37%).

After starting arformoteral, 58% of beneficiaries received dual therapy. More than half of them, 52%, received LABA and inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, 6% received LAMA/LAMA therapy, and 21% received triple-therapy (LABA/LAMA plus inhaled or nebulized corticosteroids). The other 20% received only arformoterol.

After initiating arformoterol, 41% of the cohort discontinued one or more classes of their pre-arformoteral medications. The largest decrease was a 23% drop in use of corticosteroids.

Dr. Celli is scheduled to present his research on Tuesday, Oct. 31, from 2:45 to 3:00 pm in Convention Center - 602B at the CHEST annual meeting. His presentation will be part of a session entitled “COPD: Lessons for the Real-World Management of Disease,” running from 2:45 to 4:15 pm.

One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.

 

Nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD are not being treated with recommended long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) maintenance therapy, based on study results scheduled to be presented at CHEST 2017.

Bartolome R. Celli, MD, FCCP, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues will report results based on Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoterol therapy.

The findings should stimulate further study on why clinicians overrely on short-acting rather than the recommended long-acting bronchodilators for maintenance treatment of appropriate patients, according to the researchers’ abstract. Additionally, studies should examine triggers for initiating arformoterol, and link outcomes to arformoterol monotherapy vs. combination therapy. Such analyses could help advance clinical decision making, particularly for COPD patients with a history of exacerbations and hospitalizations.

copyright designer491/Thinkstock
For the study, the researchers examined COPD patients’ therapeutic regimens for the 90 days prior to and following the start of arformoterol therapy. Patients were classed based on one of four treatment options: long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and inhaled long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABAs), including fixed-dose LABA and inhaled corticosteroid combinations; inhaled and nebulized corticosteroids; methylxanthines; and other medications such as short-acting bronchodilators, oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics.

Rates of medication initiation and treatment continuation or discontinuation within these classes were determined based on refill patterns following the start of arformoterol therapy. The researchers note that 42% of the patient cohort was 75 years or older, and 37% were dually eligible for Medicaid.

Overall, 46% of the cohort had received no LABD maintenance treatment in the 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol. Instead, they were being treated with a nebulized (50%) or an inhaled (37%) short-acting bronchodilator, a systemic corticosteroid (46%), and antibiotics (37%).

After starting arformoteral, 58% of beneficiaries received dual therapy. More than half of them, 52%, received LABA and inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, 6% received LAMA/LAMA therapy, and 21% received triple-therapy (LABA/LAMA plus inhaled or nebulized corticosteroids). The other 20% received only arformoterol.

After initiating arformoterol, 41% of the cohort discontinued one or more classes of their pre-arformoteral medications. The largest decrease was a 23% drop in use of corticosteroids.

Dr. Celli is scheduled to present his research on Tuesday, Oct. 31, from 2:45 to 3:00 pm in Convention Center - 602B at the CHEST annual meeting. His presentation will be part of a session entitled “COPD: Lessons for the Real-World Management of Disease,” running from 2:45 to 4:15 pm.

One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM CHEST 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Clinicians overrely on short-acting rather than recommended long-acting bronchodilators for maintenance treatment of appropriate COPD patients.

Major finding: Overall, 46% of COPD patients on Medicare had received no long-acting bronchodilator maintenance treatment in the 90 days before they started arformoterol therapy.

Data source: Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoteral therapy.

Disclosures: One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.

Disqus Comments
Default