User login
Brown spots on face
The results of a 4-mm punch biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of actinic lichen planus. As the name implies, this form of lichen planus occurs in areas of sun exposure. Treatment is the same as for other forms of lichen planus, with the addition of avoiding the sun.
The FP counseled the patient about the use of sunscreen and avoiding sun exposure as much as possible. The FP then prescribed a mid-potency topical corticosteroid, 0.1% triamcinolone cream. (A low-potency steroid is unlikely to be beneficial.) In cases like this one, a short course of a mid-potency steroid should be safe on the face without causing atrophy.
At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the appearance of the patient’s face and hands. The patient was pleased with these results and said she’d been more careful with sun exposure. The FP prescribed 2.5% hydrocortisone cream to be used on the face as needed, in conjunction with the continued use of triamcinolone on the hands as needed.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Kraft RL, Usatine R. Lichen planus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 901-909.
To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/
You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com
The results of a 4-mm punch biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of actinic lichen planus. As the name implies, this form of lichen planus occurs in areas of sun exposure. Treatment is the same as for other forms of lichen planus, with the addition of avoiding the sun.
The FP counseled the patient about the use of sunscreen and avoiding sun exposure as much as possible. The FP then prescribed a mid-potency topical corticosteroid, 0.1% triamcinolone cream. (A low-potency steroid is unlikely to be beneficial.) In cases like this one, a short course of a mid-potency steroid should be safe on the face without causing atrophy.
At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the appearance of the patient’s face and hands. The patient was pleased with these results and said she’d been more careful with sun exposure. The FP prescribed 2.5% hydrocortisone cream to be used on the face as needed, in conjunction with the continued use of triamcinolone on the hands as needed.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Kraft RL, Usatine R. Lichen planus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 901-909.
To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/
You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com
The results of a 4-mm punch biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of actinic lichen planus. As the name implies, this form of lichen planus occurs in areas of sun exposure. Treatment is the same as for other forms of lichen planus, with the addition of avoiding the sun.
The FP counseled the patient about the use of sunscreen and avoiding sun exposure as much as possible. The FP then prescribed a mid-potency topical corticosteroid, 0.1% triamcinolone cream. (A low-potency steroid is unlikely to be beneficial.) In cases like this one, a short course of a mid-potency steroid should be safe on the face without causing atrophy.
At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in the appearance of the patient’s face and hands. The patient was pleased with these results and said she’d been more careful with sun exposure. The FP prescribed 2.5% hydrocortisone cream to be used on the face as needed, in conjunction with the continued use of triamcinolone on the hands as needed.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Kraft RL, Usatine R. Lichen planus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013: 901-909.
To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/
You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com
Novel picosecond laser improves acne scarring
Novel picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers used with a new holographic beam splitter safely and effectively treated facial acne scars in a prospective study.
Among the 27 participants who completed the study, the mean improvement in acne scarring was 1.4 on a 10-point global aesthetic scale (range –4 to 6 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.9); these assessments were performed by three blinded physician reviewers 12 weeks after the last treatment. In addition, 23 (85%) of the participants reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment, Eric F. Bernstein, MD, who is in private practice in Ardmore, Pa., and his coauthors reported (Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Nov;49[9]:796-802).
The study comprised 27 men and women with Fitzpatrick skin types II-V whose mean age was 45 years. They were treated with four monthly treatments. Of the participants, 19 were treated with the 1,064 nm laser and 8 with the 532 nm laser; both treatments employed a novel holographic hand piece to deliver precise beams of focused laser energy. Blinded physician reviewers evaluated digital images taken both before treatment and 12 weeks after the final treatment.
Based on the averages of scores from the reviewers, 81% of the participants showed some degree of improvement, 48% had a mean improvement of at least 2 points, and 26% had a mean improvement score of at least 3 points.
Participants experienced some side effects immediately after treatment, including mild to moderate erythema (100% of patients for both lasers), mild to moderate edema (95% for 1,064 nm, 97% for 532 nm), mild to moderate petechiae (50%, 38%), and mild purpura (17%, 0%). All these responses cleared within a few hours or a few days after treatments, according to patient reports.
None of the patients experienced pigmentary changes, based on before and after treatment photos. In contrast, the most commonly used laser for treating acne scarring – the nonfractionated CO2 laser – causes significant hyperpigmentation and even permanent hypopigmentation, the authors pointed out.
No significant difference was seen when comparing mean improvement scores between participants treated with the 1,064 nm lasers and those treated with the 532 nm lasers.
“The use of picosecond-domain pulses delivers clinical benefits at lower fluences and energies than would be required at longer pulse durations and may offer qualitatively different tissue effects than earlier-generation lasers,” Dr. Bernstein and his coauthors wrote. “Future studies investigating combinations of the 1,064 and 532 nm picosecond-domain fractionated wavelengths, as well as larger trials with skin types V and VI, should increase the ways the device is used and the conditions it is used to treat,” they added.
Limitations of the study included the short 3-month follow-up, they noted.
The study was funded by Syneron Candela, the manufacturer of the laser and the holographic beam-splitting optic used in the study; the company loaned the equipment for the study. Dr. Bernstein is a consultant for Syneron Candela. Two of the five authors were employees of Syneron Candela at the time the study was conducted. No other financial disclosures were reported.
Novel picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers used with a new holographic beam splitter safely and effectively treated facial acne scars in a prospective study.
Among the 27 participants who completed the study, the mean improvement in acne scarring was 1.4 on a 10-point global aesthetic scale (range –4 to 6 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.9); these assessments were performed by three blinded physician reviewers 12 weeks after the last treatment. In addition, 23 (85%) of the participants reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment, Eric F. Bernstein, MD, who is in private practice in Ardmore, Pa., and his coauthors reported (Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Nov;49[9]:796-802).
The study comprised 27 men and women with Fitzpatrick skin types II-V whose mean age was 45 years. They were treated with four monthly treatments. Of the participants, 19 were treated with the 1,064 nm laser and 8 with the 532 nm laser; both treatments employed a novel holographic hand piece to deliver precise beams of focused laser energy. Blinded physician reviewers evaluated digital images taken both before treatment and 12 weeks after the final treatment.
Based on the averages of scores from the reviewers, 81% of the participants showed some degree of improvement, 48% had a mean improvement of at least 2 points, and 26% had a mean improvement score of at least 3 points.
Participants experienced some side effects immediately after treatment, including mild to moderate erythema (100% of patients for both lasers), mild to moderate edema (95% for 1,064 nm, 97% for 532 nm), mild to moderate petechiae (50%, 38%), and mild purpura (17%, 0%). All these responses cleared within a few hours or a few days after treatments, according to patient reports.
None of the patients experienced pigmentary changes, based on before and after treatment photos. In contrast, the most commonly used laser for treating acne scarring – the nonfractionated CO2 laser – causes significant hyperpigmentation and even permanent hypopigmentation, the authors pointed out.
No significant difference was seen when comparing mean improvement scores between participants treated with the 1,064 nm lasers and those treated with the 532 nm lasers.
“The use of picosecond-domain pulses delivers clinical benefits at lower fluences and energies than would be required at longer pulse durations and may offer qualitatively different tissue effects than earlier-generation lasers,” Dr. Bernstein and his coauthors wrote. “Future studies investigating combinations of the 1,064 and 532 nm picosecond-domain fractionated wavelengths, as well as larger trials with skin types V and VI, should increase the ways the device is used and the conditions it is used to treat,” they added.
Limitations of the study included the short 3-month follow-up, they noted.
The study was funded by Syneron Candela, the manufacturer of the laser and the holographic beam-splitting optic used in the study; the company loaned the equipment for the study. Dr. Bernstein is a consultant for Syneron Candela. Two of the five authors were employees of Syneron Candela at the time the study was conducted. No other financial disclosures were reported.
Novel picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers used with a new holographic beam splitter safely and effectively treated facial acne scars in a prospective study.
Among the 27 participants who completed the study, the mean improvement in acne scarring was 1.4 on a 10-point global aesthetic scale (range –4 to 6 points; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.9); these assessments were performed by three blinded physician reviewers 12 weeks after the last treatment. In addition, 23 (85%) of the participants reported that they were satisfied or very satisfied with their treatment, Eric F. Bernstein, MD, who is in private practice in Ardmore, Pa., and his coauthors reported (Lasers Surg Med. 2017 Nov;49[9]:796-802).
The study comprised 27 men and women with Fitzpatrick skin types II-V whose mean age was 45 years. They were treated with four monthly treatments. Of the participants, 19 were treated with the 1,064 nm laser and 8 with the 532 nm laser; both treatments employed a novel holographic hand piece to deliver precise beams of focused laser energy. Blinded physician reviewers evaluated digital images taken both before treatment and 12 weeks after the final treatment.
Based on the averages of scores from the reviewers, 81% of the participants showed some degree of improvement, 48% had a mean improvement of at least 2 points, and 26% had a mean improvement score of at least 3 points.
Participants experienced some side effects immediately after treatment, including mild to moderate erythema (100% of patients for both lasers), mild to moderate edema (95% for 1,064 nm, 97% for 532 nm), mild to moderate petechiae (50%, 38%), and mild purpura (17%, 0%). All these responses cleared within a few hours or a few days after treatments, according to patient reports.
None of the patients experienced pigmentary changes, based on before and after treatment photos. In contrast, the most commonly used laser for treating acne scarring – the nonfractionated CO2 laser – causes significant hyperpigmentation and even permanent hypopigmentation, the authors pointed out.
No significant difference was seen when comparing mean improvement scores between participants treated with the 1,064 nm lasers and those treated with the 532 nm lasers.
“The use of picosecond-domain pulses delivers clinical benefits at lower fluences and energies than would be required at longer pulse durations and may offer qualitatively different tissue effects than earlier-generation lasers,” Dr. Bernstein and his coauthors wrote. “Future studies investigating combinations of the 1,064 and 532 nm picosecond-domain fractionated wavelengths, as well as larger trials with skin types V and VI, should increase the ways the device is used and the conditions it is used to treat,” they added.
Limitations of the study included the short 3-month follow-up, they noted.
The study was funded by Syneron Candela, the manufacturer of the laser and the holographic beam-splitting optic used in the study; the company loaned the equipment for the study. Dr. Bernstein is a consultant for Syneron Candela. Two of the five authors were employees of Syneron Candela at the time the study was conducted. No other financial disclosures were reported.
FROM LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE
Key clinical point: A new picosecond-domain 1,064 nm and 532 nm Nd:YAG laser combined with a novel holographic beam splitter can treat facial acne scars safely and effectively.
Major finding: All 27 participants who completed the study saw a mean improvement in acne scarring of 1.4 on a 10-point scale, with improvement ranging up to 60%.
Data source: A prospective study of participants with facial acne scars who were treated with four monthly laser treatments.
Disclosures: The study was funded by Syneron Candela, the manufacturer of the laser and the holographic beam-splitting optic used in the study; the company loaned the equipment for the study. Dr. Bernstein is a consultant for Syneron Candela. Two of the five authors were employees of Syneron Candela at the time the study was conducted. No other financial disclosures were reported.
In close vote, advisory panel prefers Shingrix over Zostavax
Herpes zoster subunit vaccine (Shingrix) was preferentially recommended over zoster vaccine live (Zostavax) for preventing herpes zoster and related complications Oct. 25 at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
Eight committee members voted for the recommendation, and seven voted against it.
In discussions leading up to the vote, some committee members cited potential supply issues, as well as the need for longer-term safety data, among other issues.
“I think it would be nice to see data on a larger population that is not just research-based, especially because we have very little data on ethnic minorities,” said Laura E. Riley, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, who voted against the recommendation.
The vote comes several days after GlaxoSmithKline announced the Food and Drug Administration approval of Shingrix for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in adults aged 50 years or older. In pooled clinical trial results, the vaccine demonstrated greater than 90% efficacy in all age groups, according to a company statement.
Shingrix is a non-live, recombinant subunit vaccine that is given in two doses, intramuscularly. Zostavax, also indicated in individuals aged 50 years or older, is a live attenuated virus vaccine.
In a related decision, ACIP voted 14-1 to recommend Shingrix for prevention of herpes zoster and related complications for immunocompetent adults aged 50 years and older.
They also voted 12-3 to recommend Shingrix to prevent herpes zoster and its complications for immunocompetent adults who previously received Zostavax.
Herpes zoster subunit vaccine (Shingrix) was preferentially recommended over zoster vaccine live (Zostavax) for preventing herpes zoster and related complications Oct. 25 at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
Eight committee members voted for the recommendation, and seven voted against it.
In discussions leading up to the vote, some committee members cited potential supply issues, as well as the need for longer-term safety data, among other issues.
“I think it would be nice to see data on a larger population that is not just research-based, especially because we have very little data on ethnic minorities,” said Laura E. Riley, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, who voted against the recommendation.
The vote comes several days after GlaxoSmithKline announced the Food and Drug Administration approval of Shingrix for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in adults aged 50 years or older. In pooled clinical trial results, the vaccine demonstrated greater than 90% efficacy in all age groups, according to a company statement.
Shingrix is a non-live, recombinant subunit vaccine that is given in two doses, intramuscularly. Zostavax, also indicated in individuals aged 50 years or older, is a live attenuated virus vaccine.
In a related decision, ACIP voted 14-1 to recommend Shingrix for prevention of herpes zoster and related complications for immunocompetent adults aged 50 years and older.
They also voted 12-3 to recommend Shingrix to prevent herpes zoster and its complications for immunocompetent adults who previously received Zostavax.
Herpes zoster subunit vaccine (Shingrix) was preferentially recommended over zoster vaccine live (Zostavax) for preventing herpes zoster and related complications Oct. 25 at a meeting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
Eight committee members voted for the recommendation, and seven voted against it.
In discussions leading up to the vote, some committee members cited potential supply issues, as well as the need for longer-term safety data, among other issues.
“I think it would be nice to see data on a larger population that is not just research-based, especially because we have very little data on ethnic minorities,” said Laura E. Riley, MD, of Harvard Medical School, Boston, who voted against the recommendation.
The vote comes several days after GlaxoSmithKline announced the Food and Drug Administration approval of Shingrix for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in adults aged 50 years or older. In pooled clinical trial results, the vaccine demonstrated greater than 90% efficacy in all age groups, according to a company statement.
Shingrix is a non-live, recombinant subunit vaccine that is given in two doses, intramuscularly. Zostavax, also indicated in individuals aged 50 years or older, is a live attenuated virus vaccine.
In a related decision, ACIP voted 14-1 to recommend Shingrix for prevention of herpes zoster and related complications for immunocompetent adults aged 50 years and older.
They also voted 12-3 to recommend Shingrix to prevent herpes zoster and its complications for immunocompetent adults who previously received Zostavax.
FROM AN ACIP MEETING
Yoga benefits lung cancer patients and caregivers alike
Yoga provides physical and mental benefits for both lung cancer patients and their caregivers, according to results of a randomized study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.
“Overall, we are encouraged by the findings,” said lead study author, Kathrin Milbury, PhD, of University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
This study provides preliminary evidence that a yoga program can provide a “buffer” and improve physical function for patients, as well as self-reported improved quality of life for both patients and their caregivers, she added.
All patients in the study had non–small cell lung cancer and were undergoing thoracic radiation therapy, which can cause respiratory toxicities that negatively affect quality of life and physical activity, according to Dr. Milbury and her coinvestigators.
A total of 32 patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to participate in 15 yoga sessions or to be in a “wait-list” control group, and 26 dyads completed all assessments.
Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.
Almost all patients (96%) rated the program as “very useful,” investigators reported at the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.
This study provides additional evidence that yoga and other nonpharmacologic supportive therapies “can be integrated into not only the care of cancer patients, but also the family caregivers who support them,” according to Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Next, the researchers plan to conduct a larger, randomized, controlled trial with a more stringent comparison group, according to Dr. Milbury.
Yoga provides physical and mental benefits for both lung cancer patients and their caregivers, according to results of a randomized study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.
“Overall, we are encouraged by the findings,” said lead study author, Kathrin Milbury, PhD, of University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
This study provides preliminary evidence that a yoga program can provide a “buffer” and improve physical function for patients, as well as self-reported improved quality of life for both patients and their caregivers, she added.
All patients in the study had non–small cell lung cancer and were undergoing thoracic radiation therapy, which can cause respiratory toxicities that negatively affect quality of life and physical activity, according to Dr. Milbury and her coinvestigators.
A total of 32 patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to participate in 15 yoga sessions or to be in a “wait-list” control group, and 26 dyads completed all assessments.
Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.
Almost all patients (96%) rated the program as “very useful,” investigators reported at the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.
This study provides additional evidence that yoga and other nonpharmacologic supportive therapies “can be integrated into not only the care of cancer patients, but also the family caregivers who support them,” according to Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Next, the researchers plan to conduct a larger, randomized, controlled trial with a more stringent comparison group, according to Dr. Milbury.
Yoga provides physical and mental benefits for both lung cancer patients and their caregivers, according to results of a randomized study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.
“Overall, we are encouraged by the findings,” said lead study author, Kathrin Milbury, PhD, of University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
This study provides preliminary evidence that a yoga program can provide a “buffer” and improve physical function for patients, as well as self-reported improved quality of life for both patients and their caregivers, she added.
All patients in the study had non–small cell lung cancer and were undergoing thoracic radiation therapy, which can cause respiratory toxicities that negatively affect quality of life and physical activity, according to Dr. Milbury and her coinvestigators.
A total of 32 patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to participate in 15 yoga sessions or to be in a “wait-list” control group, and 26 dyads completed all assessments.
Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.
Almost all patients (96%) rated the program as “very useful,” investigators reported at the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.
This study provides additional evidence that yoga and other nonpharmacologic supportive therapies “can be integrated into not only the care of cancer patients, but also the family caregivers who support them,” according to Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Next, the researchers plan to conduct a larger, randomized, controlled trial with a more stringent comparison group, according to Dr. Milbury.
FROM PALLONC 2017
Key clinical point: Yoga provides both physical and mental benefits for lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and their caregivers.
Major finding: Patients who practiced yoga had significantly better scores on a 6-minute walking test (478 vs. 402 for wait-list enrollees; P less than .05), plus better stamina and mental health. Caregivers had improved fatigue and better stamina at work.
Data source: Randomized study including 47 patient-caregiver dyads, of which 32 consented and 26 completed all assessments.
Disclosures: Funding for this study came from the National Institutes of Health. Lead author Kathrin Milbury, PhD, reported no potential conflicts of interest.
VIDEO: When surgery hurts the surgeon: Intervening to prevent ergonomic injuries
SAN DIEGO – Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are practically inevitable for surgeons, eventually occurring in more than 90%, no matter what type of surgery they practice.
At the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, this eyebrow-raising fact was presented with a sobering addendum: No one seems to be doing much about it.
“There are some ergonomic guidelines for surgeons out there, but most surgeons don’t know about them,” said Tatiana Catanzarite, MD, who has conducted research on this topic. When she began looking into the problem of work-related injuries among surgeons, she was surprised at the dearth of published research. It’s no wonder then, said Dr. Catanzarite and other panel members, that most surgeons learn proper work posture on the fly and may or may not be using the most efficient and mechanically sound instrumentation angles when performing surgery.
Dr. Catanzarite, a female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego, has just published a literature review on surgeon ergonomics. But reading about how to stand, how to hold instruments, and even how to sit at a robotic surgical console is no match for having an observer on the ground guiding and reinforcing work posture, she said. Unfortunately, that’s an unrealistic expectation for most surgeons, so Dr. Catanzarite is borrowing video-gaming technology to address the situation, she said in an interview.
She has adapted a popular video game motion-capture system that uses an infrared laser projector and a computer sensor to capture video data in three dimensions. The sensing range of the depth sensor is adjustable, and the software is capable of automatically calibrating the sensor based on the physical environment, accommodating the presence of obstacles and using infrared and depth cameras to capture a subject’s 3-D movements. The system doesn’t require bulky wearable components, “making it an ideal technology for the live operating room setting,” Dr. Catanzarite said. “In order to effectively assess surgical ergonomics, a less intrusive approach is needed, which can deliver precise reports on the body movements of the surgeons, as well as capturing the temporal distribution of different postures and limb angles.”
Dr. Catanzarite is using the system to launch an ergonomics assessment tool she calls Ergo-Kinect. The system will record surgeons’ movements in real time, gathering data about how they stand, move, and operate their instruments.
“Three-D interactive visualizations allow us to rotate and investigate specific motor activities from the collected data,” she said. The technology enables them to capture the movements of the surgeon and assign an ergonomic score for each movement. “Eventually we may be able to develop a system that can warn surgeons in real time if they are performing an activity which may be harmful from an ergonomics standpoint,” Dr. Catanzarite said.
The research is in its earliest phase – Dr. Catanzarite has only scanned a few surgeons. But she will continue to accrue data in order to eventually construct a system that could help surgeons of the future avoid the painful, and sometimes debilitating, physical costs of their career.
Dr. Catanzarite reported having no financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @alz_gal
SAN DIEGO – Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are practically inevitable for surgeons, eventually occurring in more than 90%, no matter what type of surgery they practice.
At the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, this eyebrow-raising fact was presented with a sobering addendum: No one seems to be doing much about it.
“There are some ergonomic guidelines for surgeons out there, but most surgeons don’t know about them,” said Tatiana Catanzarite, MD, who has conducted research on this topic. When she began looking into the problem of work-related injuries among surgeons, she was surprised at the dearth of published research. It’s no wonder then, said Dr. Catanzarite and other panel members, that most surgeons learn proper work posture on the fly and may or may not be using the most efficient and mechanically sound instrumentation angles when performing surgery.
Dr. Catanzarite, a female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego, has just published a literature review on surgeon ergonomics. But reading about how to stand, how to hold instruments, and even how to sit at a robotic surgical console is no match for having an observer on the ground guiding and reinforcing work posture, she said. Unfortunately, that’s an unrealistic expectation for most surgeons, so Dr. Catanzarite is borrowing video-gaming technology to address the situation, she said in an interview.
She has adapted a popular video game motion-capture system that uses an infrared laser projector and a computer sensor to capture video data in three dimensions. The sensing range of the depth sensor is adjustable, and the software is capable of automatically calibrating the sensor based on the physical environment, accommodating the presence of obstacles and using infrared and depth cameras to capture a subject’s 3-D movements. The system doesn’t require bulky wearable components, “making it an ideal technology for the live operating room setting,” Dr. Catanzarite said. “In order to effectively assess surgical ergonomics, a less intrusive approach is needed, which can deliver precise reports on the body movements of the surgeons, as well as capturing the temporal distribution of different postures and limb angles.”
Dr. Catanzarite is using the system to launch an ergonomics assessment tool she calls Ergo-Kinect. The system will record surgeons’ movements in real time, gathering data about how they stand, move, and operate their instruments.
“Three-D interactive visualizations allow us to rotate and investigate specific motor activities from the collected data,” she said. The technology enables them to capture the movements of the surgeon and assign an ergonomic score for each movement. “Eventually we may be able to develop a system that can warn surgeons in real time if they are performing an activity which may be harmful from an ergonomics standpoint,” Dr. Catanzarite said.
The research is in its earliest phase – Dr. Catanzarite has only scanned a few surgeons. But she will continue to accrue data in order to eventually construct a system that could help surgeons of the future avoid the painful, and sometimes debilitating, physical costs of their career.
Dr. Catanzarite reported having no financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @alz_gal
SAN DIEGO – Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are practically inevitable for surgeons, eventually occurring in more than 90%, no matter what type of surgery they practice.
At the annual clinical congress of the American College of Surgeons, this eyebrow-raising fact was presented with a sobering addendum: No one seems to be doing much about it.
“There are some ergonomic guidelines for surgeons out there, but most surgeons don’t know about them,” said Tatiana Catanzarite, MD, who has conducted research on this topic. When she began looking into the problem of work-related injuries among surgeons, she was surprised at the dearth of published research. It’s no wonder then, said Dr. Catanzarite and other panel members, that most surgeons learn proper work posture on the fly and may or may not be using the most efficient and mechanically sound instrumentation angles when performing surgery.
Dr. Catanzarite, a female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery fellow at the University of California, San Diego, has just published a literature review on surgeon ergonomics. But reading about how to stand, how to hold instruments, and even how to sit at a robotic surgical console is no match for having an observer on the ground guiding and reinforcing work posture, she said. Unfortunately, that’s an unrealistic expectation for most surgeons, so Dr. Catanzarite is borrowing video-gaming technology to address the situation, she said in an interview.
She has adapted a popular video game motion-capture system that uses an infrared laser projector and a computer sensor to capture video data in three dimensions. The sensing range of the depth sensor is adjustable, and the software is capable of automatically calibrating the sensor based on the physical environment, accommodating the presence of obstacles and using infrared and depth cameras to capture a subject’s 3-D movements. The system doesn’t require bulky wearable components, “making it an ideal technology for the live operating room setting,” Dr. Catanzarite said. “In order to effectively assess surgical ergonomics, a less intrusive approach is needed, which can deliver precise reports on the body movements of the surgeons, as well as capturing the temporal distribution of different postures and limb angles.”
Dr. Catanzarite is using the system to launch an ergonomics assessment tool she calls Ergo-Kinect. The system will record surgeons’ movements in real time, gathering data about how they stand, move, and operate their instruments.
“Three-D interactive visualizations allow us to rotate and investigate specific motor activities from the collected data,” she said. The technology enables them to capture the movements of the surgeon and assign an ergonomic score for each movement. “Eventually we may be able to develop a system that can warn surgeons in real time if they are performing an activity which may be harmful from an ergonomics standpoint,” Dr. Catanzarite said.
The research is in its earliest phase – Dr. Catanzarite has only scanned a few surgeons. But she will continue to accrue data in order to eventually construct a system that could help surgeons of the future avoid the painful, and sometimes debilitating, physical costs of their career.
Dr. Catanzarite reported having no financial disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @alz_gal
AT THE ACS CLINICAL CONGRESS
AML patients overestimate treatment risk and chance of cure
Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.
Compared with what their oncologists thought, patients were significantly more likely to believe they would die from treatment, said senior study author Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
Yet when surveyed again 1 month later, they were significantly more likely to overestimate the chances of being cured, versus the chances of cure given by their oncologists.
“We really need interventions to facilitate communication and ensure accurate prognostic understanding in this patient population, where understanding the treatment risk and prognosis can have a significant effect on their treatment choices and treatment decisions,” Dr. El-Jawahri said in a press conference from the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.
Patients were first surveyed within 72 hours of starting chemotherapy.
At that point, 91% of patients said it was somewhat likely (63%) or extremely likely (28%) they would die as a result of their treatment, but among their oncologists, only 22% said death due to treatment was somewhat likely, and none thought it was very likely, according to the presented data.
A much different picture emerged 1 month later, when 90% of patients said they were somewhat or very likely to be cured of their leukemia, while only 26% of physicians said it was somewhat likely for the patient to be cured.
For both the question on treatment risk and the question on cure potential, the differences between patient responses and physician responses was significant (P less than .001), according to Dr. El-Jawahri.
Of note, half of the patients (n = 50) received intensive chemotherapy, while the other half received nonintensive (that is, palliative) chemotherapy. Patients receiving palliative therapy were even more likely to overestimate their chances of cure, Dr. El-Jawahi said.
This study highlights how stress and anxiety might shape a patient’s perception of treatment and prognosis, and provides new evidence that “accurate knowledge” can lead to “efficiencies on both sides of this [doctor-patient] interface,” said Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
A shared understanding of prognosis and treatment risk between clinician and patient is “crucial in informed consent” and can help patients make better-informed decisions with their doctor, said Dr. Epstein, who was not involved with the study.
This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.
Compared with what their oncologists thought, patients were significantly more likely to believe they would die from treatment, said senior study author Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
Yet when surveyed again 1 month later, they were significantly more likely to overestimate the chances of being cured, versus the chances of cure given by their oncologists.
“We really need interventions to facilitate communication and ensure accurate prognostic understanding in this patient population, where understanding the treatment risk and prognosis can have a significant effect on their treatment choices and treatment decisions,” Dr. El-Jawahri said in a press conference from the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.
Patients were first surveyed within 72 hours of starting chemotherapy.
At that point, 91% of patients said it was somewhat likely (63%) or extremely likely (28%) they would die as a result of their treatment, but among their oncologists, only 22% said death due to treatment was somewhat likely, and none thought it was very likely, according to the presented data.
A much different picture emerged 1 month later, when 90% of patients said they were somewhat or very likely to be cured of their leukemia, while only 26% of physicians said it was somewhat likely for the patient to be cured.
For both the question on treatment risk and the question on cure potential, the differences between patient responses and physician responses was significant (P less than .001), according to Dr. El-Jawahri.
Of note, half of the patients (n = 50) received intensive chemotherapy, while the other half received nonintensive (that is, palliative) chemotherapy. Patients receiving palliative therapy were even more likely to overestimate their chances of cure, Dr. El-Jawahi said.
This study highlights how stress and anxiety might shape a patient’s perception of treatment and prognosis, and provides new evidence that “accurate knowledge” can lead to “efficiencies on both sides of this [doctor-patient] interface,” said Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
A shared understanding of prognosis and treatment risk between clinician and patient is “crucial in informed consent” and can help patients make better-informed decisions with their doctor, said Dr. Epstein, who was not involved with the study.
This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) tend to overestimate not only the risks of treatment, but also their likelihood of cure, according to the results of a 100-patient longitudinal study presented at the Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium.
Compared with what their oncologists thought, patients were significantly more likely to believe they would die from treatment, said senior study author Areej El-Jawahri, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.
Yet when surveyed again 1 month later, they were significantly more likely to overestimate the chances of being cured, versus the chances of cure given by their oncologists.
“We really need interventions to facilitate communication and ensure accurate prognostic understanding in this patient population, where understanding the treatment risk and prognosis can have a significant effect on their treatment choices and treatment decisions,” Dr. El-Jawahri said in a press conference from the symposium, which was cosponsored by AAHPM, ASCO, ASTRO, and MASCC.
Patients were first surveyed within 72 hours of starting chemotherapy.
At that point, 91% of patients said it was somewhat likely (63%) or extremely likely (28%) they would die as a result of their treatment, but among their oncologists, only 22% said death due to treatment was somewhat likely, and none thought it was very likely, according to the presented data.
A much different picture emerged 1 month later, when 90% of patients said they were somewhat or very likely to be cured of their leukemia, while only 26% of physicians said it was somewhat likely for the patient to be cured.
For both the question on treatment risk and the question on cure potential, the differences between patient responses and physician responses was significant (P less than .001), according to Dr. El-Jawahri.
Of note, half of the patients (n = 50) received intensive chemotherapy, while the other half received nonintensive (that is, palliative) chemotherapy. Patients receiving palliative therapy were even more likely to overestimate their chances of cure, Dr. El-Jawahi said.
This study highlights how stress and anxiety might shape a patient’s perception of treatment and prognosis, and provides new evidence that “accurate knowledge” can lead to “efficiencies on both sides of this [doctor-patient] interface,” said Andrew S. Epstein, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
A shared understanding of prognosis and treatment risk between clinician and patient is “crucial in informed consent” and can help patients make better-informed decisions with their doctor, said Dr. Epstein, who was not involved with the study.
This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.
FROM PALLONC 2017
Key clinical point: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients overestimated both the risks of treatment and the chances of cure, compared with estimates from their own oncologists.
Major finding: Ninety-one percent of patients thought it was somewhat or extremely likely they would die from the treatment, while only 22% of oncologists said it was somewhat likely. A month later, 90% of patients thought it was somewhat or very likely they would be cured of their AML, but only 26% of oncologists said cure was somewhat likely.
Data source: A longitudinal study including 100 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated at one of two tertiary hospitals.
Disclosures: This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute. Dr. El-Jawahri, the senior author, reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Still too early to determine impact of 1-year deferral for MSM blood donors
SAN DIEGO – It’s still too early to assess the impact of new guidelines for blood donation by men who have had sex with men, Brian S. Custer, PhD, MPH, of Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Blood Banks.
In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its lifetime ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men (MSM) and changed it to a 1-year deferral policy. Based on this new guidance, many U.S. blood centers moved from an indefinite deferral for any man who reported having had sex with a man since 1977 to a 1-year deferral from last sexual contact with a man.
In their study, Dr. Custer and his colleagues assessed the impact of the change in policy on donors and whether there was any early evidence of a change in risk to blood recipients.
At their center, the 1-year deferral was implemented on Aug. 29, 2016. On the health questionnaire that potential donors must complete, males are now asked two questions – one regarding sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and another about sex with men since 1977.
The rates of deferral were evaluated in two 7-month periods before and after the policy change (September 2015-March 2016 and September 2016-March 2017). They also looked at donor requests to be reinstated in lieu of the new policy, along with infectious disease marker test results in accepted donors.
In 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, 408 men responded yes to having sex with men since 1977 and 370 were deferred.
For the 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, 245 men answered yes to having sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and 245 were deferred.
Some of the men who reported having sex with men before the policy change were evaluated and accepted as donors. Overall, the donor acceptance rate was 9.3% during the period before the policy change, and 64.2% for the period after the policy change.
“Only 67 men requested to be reinstated and have been reinstated, and 39 returned to donate. There have been 59 successful donations to date,” said Dr. Custer.
Some of the reinstated donors were deferred for reasons similar to those for deferral of donors who are not men who have sex with men. Although it is still too early to draw any conclusions, Dr. Custer noted that they are being cautious, because infectious markers still are running a little higher among male donors with a history of having sex with men and donors without such a history.
SAN DIEGO – It’s still too early to assess the impact of new guidelines for blood donation by men who have had sex with men, Brian S. Custer, PhD, MPH, of Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Blood Banks.
In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its lifetime ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men (MSM) and changed it to a 1-year deferral policy. Based on this new guidance, many U.S. blood centers moved from an indefinite deferral for any man who reported having had sex with a man since 1977 to a 1-year deferral from last sexual contact with a man.
In their study, Dr. Custer and his colleagues assessed the impact of the change in policy on donors and whether there was any early evidence of a change in risk to blood recipients.
At their center, the 1-year deferral was implemented on Aug. 29, 2016. On the health questionnaire that potential donors must complete, males are now asked two questions – one regarding sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and another about sex with men since 1977.
The rates of deferral were evaluated in two 7-month periods before and after the policy change (September 2015-March 2016 and September 2016-March 2017). They also looked at donor requests to be reinstated in lieu of the new policy, along with infectious disease marker test results in accepted donors.
In 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, 408 men responded yes to having sex with men since 1977 and 370 were deferred.
For the 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, 245 men answered yes to having sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and 245 were deferred.
Some of the men who reported having sex with men before the policy change were evaluated and accepted as donors. Overall, the donor acceptance rate was 9.3% during the period before the policy change, and 64.2% for the period after the policy change.
“Only 67 men requested to be reinstated and have been reinstated, and 39 returned to donate. There have been 59 successful donations to date,” said Dr. Custer.
Some of the reinstated donors were deferred for reasons similar to those for deferral of donors who are not men who have sex with men. Although it is still too early to draw any conclusions, Dr. Custer noted that they are being cautious, because infectious markers still are running a little higher among male donors with a history of having sex with men and donors without such a history.
SAN DIEGO – It’s still too early to assess the impact of new guidelines for blood donation by men who have had sex with men, Brian S. Custer, PhD, MPH, of Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, said at the annual meeting of the American Association of Blood Banks.
In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration lifted its lifetime ban on blood donations by men who have sex with men (MSM) and changed it to a 1-year deferral policy. Based on this new guidance, many U.S. blood centers moved from an indefinite deferral for any man who reported having had sex with a man since 1977 to a 1-year deferral from last sexual contact with a man.
In their study, Dr. Custer and his colleagues assessed the impact of the change in policy on donors and whether there was any early evidence of a change in risk to blood recipients.
At their center, the 1-year deferral was implemented on Aug. 29, 2016. On the health questionnaire that potential donors must complete, males are now asked two questions – one regarding sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and another about sex with men since 1977.
The rates of deferral were evaluated in two 7-month periods before and after the policy change (September 2015-March 2016 and September 2016-March 2017). They also looked at donor requests to be reinstated in lieu of the new policy, along with infectious disease marker test results in accepted donors.
In 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, 408 men responded yes to having sex with men since 1977 and 370 were deferred.
For the 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, 245 men answered yes to having sexual contact with men in the previous 12 months, and 245 were deferred.
Some of the men who reported having sex with men before the policy change were evaluated and accepted as donors. Overall, the donor acceptance rate was 9.3% during the period before the policy change, and 64.2% for the period after the policy change.
“Only 67 men requested to be reinstated and have been reinstated, and 39 returned to donate. There have been 59 successful donations to date,” said Dr. Custer.
Some of the reinstated donors were deferred for reasons similar to those for deferral of donors who are not men who have sex with men. Although it is still too early to draw any conclusions, Dr. Custer noted that they are being cautious, because infectious markers still are running a little higher among male donors with a history of having sex with men and donors without such a history.
AT AABB2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Of 370 men deferred for blood donation because of ever having sex with a man since 1977, 67 have requested to be reinstated as donors under the new 1-year deferral policy and 39 returned to donate blood.
Data source: 272,306 interviews conducted before the policy change, and 252,395 interviews conducted after the policy change, at Blood Systems Research Institute.
Disclosures: Dr. Custer had no relevant financial disclosures.
Oligoclonal Bands Could Be a Valuable Criterion for the Diagnosis of MS
PARIS—Oligoclonal bands, together with symptomatic lesions disseminated in space, increase the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. MRI dissemination in space (DIS) at any time plus positive oligoclonal bands should be considered as an additional criterion for MS diagnosis, according to the researchers.
Previous research has suggested that the presence of oligoclonal bands in typical clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) increases the risk of a second attack independently of MRI findings. Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD, a neurologist at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, and colleagues studied an ongoing CIS cohort to explore whether oligoclonal bands would be a valuable criterion for MS diagnosis in the context of the 2010 McDonald criteria.
An Examination of MRIs
The investigators obtained MRIs at three to five months after CIS diagnosis, at one year, and at every five years. Oligoclonal bands were determined by isoelectric focusing combined with immunoblotting. Dr. Arrambide and colleagues selected 565 patients with oligoclonal band determination and sufficient data on baseline brain MRI to assess 2010 DIS and dissemination in time (DIT) considering the symptomatic lesions. They excluded 167 participants (29.6%) who already fulfilled DIS and DIT criteria and divided the remaining 398 participants into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 218), DIS only (n = 164), and DIT only (n = 16).
Next, the researchers performed Cox proportional hazards regression models with 2010 McDonald as the outcome, using no DIS no DIT with no lesions (n = 107) as the reference for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion, DIS only, and DIT only. To assess performance, Dr. Arrambide’s group selected cases with a follow-up of three or more years or a second attack within three years of the CIS (n = 305). These participants were divided into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 165), DIS only (n = 129), and DIT only (n = 11). The investigators classified participants with no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion (n = 93) and DIS only according to their oligoclonal band status. They assessed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with 2010 McDonald at three years as the outcome.
Oligoclonal Bands Increased Risk of Conversion to MS
The adjusted hazard ratios of second attack were 2.8 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 6.4 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 9.7 for DIS only with negative oligoclonal bands, 14.8 for DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands, and 7.9 for DIT only. Regarding performance, specificity was 77.6 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 89.1 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 92.5 for DIS only and negative oligoclonal bands, 88.1 for DIS only and positive oligoclonal bands, and 97.8 for DIT only. DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands had the highest sensitivity (46.2), accuracy (64.6), and positive predictive value (83.2).
PARIS—Oligoclonal bands, together with symptomatic lesions disseminated in space, increase the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. MRI dissemination in space (DIS) at any time plus positive oligoclonal bands should be considered as an additional criterion for MS diagnosis, according to the researchers.
Previous research has suggested that the presence of oligoclonal bands in typical clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) increases the risk of a second attack independently of MRI findings. Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD, a neurologist at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, and colleagues studied an ongoing CIS cohort to explore whether oligoclonal bands would be a valuable criterion for MS diagnosis in the context of the 2010 McDonald criteria.
An Examination of MRIs
The investigators obtained MRIs at three to five months after CIS diagnosis, at one year, and at every five years. Oligoclonal bands were determined by isoelectric focusing combined with immunoblotting. Dr. Arrambide and colleagues selected 565 patients with oligoclonal band determination and sufficient data on baseline brain MRI to assess 2010 DIS and dissemination in time (DIT) considering the symptomatic lesions. They excluded 167 participants (29.6%) who already fulfilled DIS and DIT criteria and divided the remaining 398 participants into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 218), DIS only (n = 164), and DIT only (n = 16).
Next, the researchers performed Cox proportional hazards regression models with 2010 McDonald as the outcome, using no DIS no DIT with no lesions (n = 107) as the reference for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion, DIS only, and DIT only. To assess performance, Dr. Arrambide’s group selected cases with a follow-up of three or more years or a second attack within three years of the CIS (n = 305). These participants were divided into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 165), DIS only (n = 129), and DIT only (n = 11). The investigators classified participants with no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion (n = 93) and DIS only according to their oligoclonal band status. They assessed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with 2010 McDonald at three years as the outcome.
Oligoclonal Bands Increased Risk of Conversion to MS
The adjusted hazard ratios of second attack were 2.8 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 6.4 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 9.7 for DIS only with negative oligoclonal bands, 14.8 for DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands, and 7.9 for DIT only. Regarding performance, specificity was 77.6 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 89.1 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 92.5 for DIS only and negative oligoclonal bands, 88.1 for DIS only and positive oligoclonal bands, and 97.8 for DIT only. DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands had the highest sensitivity (46.2), accuracy (64.6), and positive predictive value (83.2).
PARIS—Oligoclonal bands, together with symptomatic lesions disseminated in space, increase the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS), according to data presented at the Seventh Joint ECTRIMS–ACTRIMS Meeting. MRI dissemination in space (DIS) at any time plus positive oligoclonal bands should be considered as an additional criterion for MS diagnosis, according to the researchers.
Previous research has suggested that the presence of oligoclonal bands in typical clinically isolated syndromes (CIS) increases the risk of a second attack independently of MRI findings. Georgina Arrambide, MD, PhD, a neurologist at Vall d’Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, and colleagues studied an ongoing CIS cohort to explore whether oligoclonal bands would be a valuable criterion for MS diagnosis in the context of the 2010 McDonald criteria.
An Examination of MRIs
The investigators obtained MRIs at three to five months after CIS diagnosis, at one year, and at every five years. Oligoclonal bands were determined by isoelectric focusing combined with immunoblotting. Dr. Arrambide and colleagues selected 565 patients with oligoclonal band determination and sufficient data on baseline brain MRI to assess 2010 DIS and dissemination in time (DIT) considering the symptomatic lesions. They excluded 167 participants (29.6%) who already fulfilled DIS and DIT criteria and divided the remaining 398 participants into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 218), DIS only (n = 164), and DIT only (n = 16).
Next, the researchers performed Cox proportional hazards regression models with 2010 McDonald as the outcome, using no DIS no DIT with no lesions (n = 107) as the reference for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion, DIS only, and DIT only. To assess performance, Dr. Arrambide’s group selected cases with a follow-up of three or more years or a second attack within three years of the CIS (n = 305). These participants were divided into groups with no DIS and no DIT (n = 165), DIS only (n = 129), and DIT only (n = 11). The investigators classified participants with no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion (n = 93) and DIS only according to their oligoclonal band status. They assessed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value with 2010 McDonald at three years as the outcome.
Oligoclonal Bands Increased Risk of Conversion to MS
The adjusted hazard ratios of second attack were 2.8 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 6.4 for no DIS and no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 9.7 for DIS only with negative oligoclonal bands, 14.8 for DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands, and 7.9 for DIT only. Regarding performance, specificity was 77.6 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and negative oligoclonal bands, 89.1 for no DIS no DIT with one or more lesion and positive oligoclonal bands, 92.5 for DIS only and negative oligoclonal bands, 88.1 for DIS only and positive oligoclonal bands, and 97.8 for DIT only. DIS only with positive oligoclonal bands had the highest sensitivity (46.2), accuracy (64.6), and positive predictive value (83.2).
Pre-injury statin use found to benefit survival following TBI
SAN DIEGO – Patients who were on statins prior to sustaining a traumatic brain injury doubled their survival rate over those who were not on the drugs in a retrospective analysis.
The study provides preliminary data that can help set a framework to conduct larger, randomized, controlled trials to further evaluate the role of statins, which have been shown in animal models to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI).
In an effort to evaluate the effect of pre-injury statins on outcomes after TBI, Dr. Lokhandwala, a general surgery resident at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and his associates identified all patients aged 40 years and older from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database with a diagnosis of TBI and ICU length of stay of greater than 24 hours. They divided patients into two groups: those who were on statins and those who were not. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. Secondary outcomes measures were hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay.
Dr. Lokhandwala, who is also a commissioned officer with the U.S. Army Reserves, reported results from 918 patients with a TBI. Their mean age was 55 years, 76% were white, and 22% were on statins. The overall in-hospital survival rate was 78.6%, while the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 12. The median hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay were 9.1 and 7.2 days, respectively. The researchers observed that compared with patients who were not on statins, those on statin therapy had significantly higher rates of survival (88% vs. 68.4%; P less than .001). However, there was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay between the two groups (P = .19 and P = .39, respectively). On regression analysis after controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).
“Even though we isolated our patients to TBI, there could have been other causes of their mortality, like a pulmonary embolism or a myocardial infarction,” Dr. Lokhandwala said. “We need to conduct a randomized, controlled trial to follow these individuals and see what their actual mortality is and look at their psychosocial outcomes to see if there’s a long-term benefit to statins. Do these people have decreased incidence of PTSD or are they more functional? Is it easier for them to hold a job or develop social relationships? The impact of post-injury statin use could also be studied.”
He went on to note that many studies have shown that aggressive team-based rehabilitation can improve outcomes in TBI patients. “Would we be able to include statin use in such a program to see if statins further improve outcomes faster or are there individuals that don’t benefit as much?” Dr. Lokhandwala asked. “This study sets up a framework to show that there is a strong association, and take this further in a more structured trial to see if there is any potential for therapeutic use in TBI.”
Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Patients who were on statins prior to sustaining a traumatic brain injury doubled their survival rate over those who were not on the drugs in a retrospective analysis.
The study provides preliminary data that can help set a framework to conduct larger, randomized, controlled trials to further evaluate the role of statins, which have been shown in animal models to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI).
In an effort to evaluate the effect of pre-injury statins on outcomes after TBI, Dr. Lokhandwala, a general surgery resident at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and his associates identified all patients aged 40 years and older from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database with a diagnosis of TBI and ICU length of stay of greater than 24 hours. They divided patients into two groups: those who were on statins and those who were not. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. Secondary outcomes measures were hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay.
Dr. Lokhandwala, who is also a commissioned officer with the U.S. Army Reserves, reported results from 918 patients with a TBI. Their mean age was 55 years, 76% were white, and 22% were on statins. The overall in-hospital survival rate was 78.6%, while the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 12. The median hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay were 9.1 and 7.2 days, respectively. The researchers observed that compared with patients who were not on statins, those on statin therapy had significantly higher rates of survival (88% vs. 68.4%; P less than .001). However, there was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay between the two groups (P = .19 and P = .39, respectively). On regression analysis after controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).
“Even though we isolated our patients to TBI, there could have been other causes of their mortality, like a pulmonary embolism or a myocardial infarction,” Dr. Lokhandwala said. “We need to conduct a randomized, controlled trial to follow these individuals and see what their actual mortality is and look at their psychosocial outcomes to see if there’s a long-term benefit to statins. Do these people have decreased incidence of PTSD or are they more functional? Is it easier for them to hold a job or develop social relationships? The impact of post-injury statin use could also be studied.”
He went on to note that many studies have shown that aggressive team-based rehabilitation can improve outcomes in TBI patients. “Would we be able to include statin use in such a program to see if statins further improve outcomes faster or are there individuals that don’t benefit as much?” Dr. Lokhandwala asked. “This study sets up a framework to show that there is a strong association, and take this further in a more structured trial to see if there is any potential for therapeutic use in TBI.”
Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Patients who were on statins prior to sustaining a traumatic brain injury doubled their survival rate over those who were not on the drugs in a retrospective analysis.
The study provides preliminary data that can help set a framework to conduct larger, randomized, controlled trials to further evaluate the role of statins, which have been shown in animal models to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI).
In an effort to evaluate the effect of pre-injury statins on outcomes after TBI, Dr. Lokhandwala, a general surgery resident at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and his associates identified all patients aged 40 years and older from the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care (MIMIC) III database with a diagnosis of TBI and ICU length of stay of greater than 24 hours. They divided patients into two groups: those who were on statins and those who were not. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. Secondary outcomes measures were hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay.
Dr. Lokhandwala, who is also a commissioned officer with the U.S. Army Reserves, reported results from 918 patients with a TBI. Their mean age was 55 years, 76% were white, and 22% were on statins. The overall in-hospital survival rate was 78.6%, while the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 12. The median hospital length of stay and ICU length of stay were 9.1 and 7.2 days, respectively. The researchers observed that compared with patients who were not on statins, those on statin therapy had significantly higher rates of survival (88% vs. 68.4%; P less than .001). However, there was no difference in hospital or ICU length of stay between the two groups (P = .19 and P = .39, respectively). On regression analysis after controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).
“Even though we isolated our patients to TBI, there could have been other causes of their mortality, like a pulmonary embolism or a myocardial infarction,” Dr. Lokhandwala said. “We need to conduct a randomized, controlled trial to follow these individuals and see what their actual mortality is and look at their psychosocial outcomes to see if there’s a long-term benefit to statins. Do these people have decreased incidence of PTSD or are they more functional? Is it easier for them to hold a job or develop social relationships? The impact of post-injury statin use could also be studied.”
He went on to note that many studies have shown that aggressive team-based rehabilitation can improve outcomes in TBI patients. “Would we be able to include statin use in such a program to see if statins further improve outcomes faster or are there individuals that don’t benefit as much?” Dr. Lokhandwala asked. “This study sets up a framework to show that there is a strong association, and take this further in a more structured trial to see if there is any potential for therapeutic use in TBI.”
Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.
AT THE ACS CLINICAL CONGRESS
Key clinical point:
Major finding: After controlling for confounding factors, statin use was found to be an independent predictor of survival following traumatic brain injury (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.2; P less than .001).
Study details: A retrospective analysis of 918 patients who sustained a TBI.
Disclosures: Dr. Lokhandwala reported having no financial disclosures.
Only half of appropriate COPD patients get long-acting bronchodilators
Nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD are not being treated with recommended long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) maintenance therapy, based on study results scheduled to be presented at CHEST 2017.
Bartolome R. Celli, MD, FCCP, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues will report results based on Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoterol therapy.
The findings should stimulate further study on why clinicians overrely on short-acting rather than the recommended long-acting bronchodilators for maintenance treatment of appropriate patients, according to the researchers’ abstract. Additionally, studies should examine triggers for initiating arformoterol, and link outcomes to arformoterol monotherapy vs. combination therapy. Such analyses could help advance clinical decision making, particularly for COPD patients with a history of exacerbations and hospitalizations.
Rates of medication initiation and treatment continuation or discontinuation within these classes were determined based on refill patterns following the start of arformoterol therapy. The researchers note that 42% of the patient cohort was 75 years or older, and 37% were dually eligible for Medicaid.
Overall, 46% of the cohort had received no LABD maintenance treatment in the 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol. Instead, they were being treated with a nebulized (50%) or an inhaled (37%) short-acting bronchodilator, a systemic corticosteroid (46%), and antibiotics (37%).
After starting arformoteral, 58% of beneficiaries received dual therapy. More than half of them, 52%, received LABA and inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, 6% received LAMA/LAMA therapy, and 21% received triple-therapy (LABA/LAMA plus inhaled or nebulized corticosteroids). The other 20% received only arformoterol.
After initiating arformoterol, 41% of the cohort discontinued one or more classes of their pre-arformoteral medications. The largest decrease was a 23% drop in use of corticosteroids.
Dr. Celli is scheduled to present his research on Tuesday, Oct. 31, from 2:45 to 3:00 pm in Convention Center - 602B at the CHEST annual meeting. His presentation will be part of a session entitled “COPD: Lessons for the Real-World Management of Disease,” running from 2:45 to 4:15 pm.
One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.
Nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD are not being treated with recommended long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) maintenance therapy, based on study results scheduled to be presented at CHEST 2017.
Bartolome R. Celli, MD, FCCP, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues will report results based on Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoterol therapy.
The findings should stimulate further study on why clinicians overrely on short-acting rather than the recommended long-acting bronchodilators for maintenance treatment of appropriate patients, according to the researchers’ abstract. Additionally, studies should examine triggers for initiating arformoterol, and link outcomes to arformoterol monotherapy vs. combination therapy. Such analyses could help advance clinical decision making, particularly for COPD patients with a history of exacerbations and hospitalizations.
Rates of medication initiation and treatment continuation or discontinuation within these classes were determined based on refill patterns following the start of arformoterol therapy. The researchers note that 42% of the patient cohort was 75 years or older, and 37% were dually eligible for Medicaid.
Overall, 46% of the cohort had received no LABD maintenance treatment in the 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol. Instead, they were being treated with a nebulized (50%) or an inhaled (37%) short-acting bronchodilator, a systemic corticosteroid (46%), and antibiotics (37%).
After starting arformoteral, 58% of beneficiaries received dual therapy. More than half of them, 52%, received LABA and inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, 6% received LAMA/LAMA therapy, and 21% received triple-therapy (LABA/LAMA plus inhaled or nebulized corticosteroids). The other 20% received only arformoterol.
After initiating arformoterol, 41% of the cohort discontinued one or more classes of their pre-arformoteral medications. The largest decrease was a 23% drop in use of corticosteroids.
Dr. Celli is scheduled to present his research on Tuesday, Oct. 31, from 2:45 to 3:00 pm in Convention Center - 602B at the CHEST annual meeting. His presentation will be part of a session entitled “COPD: Lessons for the Real-World Management of Disease,” running from 2:45 to 4:15 pm.
One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.
Nearly half of Medicare beneficiaries with COPD are not being treated with recommended long-acting bronchodilator (LABD) maintenance therapy, based on study results scheduled to be presented at CHEST 2017.
Bartolome R. Celli, MD, FCCP, of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues will report results based on Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoterol therapy.
The findings should stimulate further study on why clinicians overrely on short-acting rather than the recommended long-acting bronchodilators for maintenance treatment of appropriate patients, according to the researchers’ abstract. Additionally, studies should examine triggers for initiating arformoterol, and link outcomes to arformoterol monotherapy vs. combination therapy. Such analyses could help advance clinical decision making, particularly for COPD patients with a history of exacerbations and hospitalizations.
Rates of medication initiation and treatment continuation or discontinuation within these classes were determined based on refill patterns following the start of arformoterol therapy. The researchers note that 42% of the patient cohort was 75 years or older, and 37% were dually eligible for Medicaid.
Overall, 46% of the cohort had received no LABD maintenance treatment in the 90 days prior to initiating arformoterol. Instead, they were being treated with a nebulized (50%) or an inhaled (37%) short-acting bronchodilator, a systemic corticosteroid (46%), and antibiotics (37%).
After starting arformoteral, 58% of beneficiaries received dual therapy. More than half of them, 52%, received LABA and inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, 6% received LAMA/LAMA therapy, and 21% received triple-therapy (LABA/LAMA plus inhaled or nebulized corticosteroids). The other 20% received only arformoterol.
After initiating arformoterol, 41% of the cohort discontinued one or more classes of their pre-arformoteral medications. The largest decrease was a 23% drop in use of corticosteroids.
Dr. Celli is scheduled to present his research on Tuesday, Oct. 31, from 2:45 to 3:00 pm in Convention Center - 602B at the CHEST annual meeting. His presentation will be part of a session entitled “COPD: Lessons for the Real-World Management of Disease,” running from 2:45 to 4:15 pm.
One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.
FROM CHEST 2017
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Overall, 46% of COPD patients on Medicare had received no long-acting bronchodilator maintenance treatment in the 90 days before they started arformoterol therapy.
Data source: Medicare administrative data from 2010 to 2014 on 11,886 patients who had at least two outpatient visits for COPD within 30 days or at least one COPD-related hospitalization and received nebulized arformoteral therapy.
Disclosures: One of the researchers is an employee of Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and two others are with Advance Health Solutions.