User login
Chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased 13-fold since 1970
The rate of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has increased significantly in the United States since 1970 and is more common in older women and in black women, according to a population-based, cross-sectional analysis.
Researchers analyzed data from more than 151 million women with delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States between 1970 and 2010 and found that the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased steadily over time from 1970 to 1990, plateaued from 1990 to 2000, then increased again to 2010.
The analysis revealed an average annual increase of 6% – which was higher among white women than among black women – and an overall 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010. These increases appeared to be independent of rates of obesity and smoking. The findings were published in Hypertension.
The rates of chronic hypertension also increased with maternal age, among both black and white women.
“The strong association between age and rates of chronic hypertension underscores the potential for both biological and social determinants of health to influence risk,” wrote Cande V. Ananth, PhD, from the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and coauthors. “The period effect in chronic hypertension in pregnancy is thus largely a product of the age effect and the increasing mean age at first birth in the U.S.”
The overall prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy was 0.63%, but was twofold higher in black women, compared with white women (1.24% vs. 0.53%). The authors noted that black women experienced disproportionally higher rates of ischemic placental disease, pregestational and gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and perinatal mortality, which may be a consequences of higher rates of obesity, social disadvantage, smoking, and less access to care.
“This disparity may also be related to the higher tendency of black women to develop vascular disease at an earlier age than white women, which may also explain why the age-associated increase in chronic hypertension among black women is relatively smaller than white women,” they wrote. “The persistent race disparity in chronic hypertension is also a cause for continued concern and underscores the role of complex population dynamics that shape risks.”
This was the largest study to evaluate changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy over time and particularly how the prevalence is influenced by age, period, and birth cohort.
In regard to the 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010, the researchers suggested that changing diagnostic criteria for hypertension, as well as earlier access to prenatal care, may have played a part. For example, the American College of Cardiology recently modified their guidelines to include patients with systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 130-139 mm Hg and 80-89 mm Hg as stage 1 hypertension, which they noted would increase the prevalence rates of chronic hypertension during pregnancy.
The researchers reported having no outside funding and no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Ananth CV et al. Hypertension. 2019 Sept 9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968.
The rate of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has increased significantly in the United States since 1970 and is more common in older women and in black women, according to a population-based, cross-sectional analysis.
Researchers analyzed data from more than 151 million women with delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States between 1970 and 2010 and found that the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased steadily over time from 1970 to 1990, plateaued from 1990 to 2000, then increased again to 2010.
The analysis revealed an average annual increase of 6% – which was higher among white women than among black women – and an overall 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010. These increases appeared to be independent of rates of obesity and smoking. The findings were published in Hypertension.
The rates of chronic hypertension also increased with maternal age, among both black and white women.
“The strong association between age and rates of chronic hypertension underscores the potential for both biological and social determinants of health to influence risk,” wrote Cande V. Ananth, PhD, from the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and coauthors. “The period effect in chronic hypertension in pregnancy is thus largely a product of the age effect and the increasing mean age at first birth in the U.S.”
The overall prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy was 0.63%, but was twofold higher in black women, compared with white women (1.24% vs. 0.53%). The authors noted that black women experienced disproportionally higher rates of ischemic placental disease, pregestational and gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and perinatal mortality, which may be a consequences of higher rates of obesity, social disadvantage, smoking, and less access to care.
“This disparity may also be related to the higher tendency of black women to develop vascular disease at an earlier age than white women, which may also explain why the age-associated increase in chronic hypertension among black women is relatively smaller than white women,” they wrote. “The persistent race disparity in chronic hypertension is also a cause for continued concern and underscores the role of complex population dynamics that shape risks.”
This was the largest study to evaluate changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy over time and particularly how the prevalence is influenced by age, period, and birth cohort.
In regard to the 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010, the researchers suggested that changing diagnostic criteria for hypertension, as well as earlier access to prenatal care, may have played a part. For example, the American College of Cardiology recently modified their guidelines to include patients with systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 130-139 mm Hg and 80-89 mm Hg as stage 1 hypertension, which they noted would increase the prevalence rates of chronic hypertension during pregnancy.
The researchers reported having no outside funding and no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Ananth CV et al. Hypertension. 2019 Sept 9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968.
The rate of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has increased significantly in the United States since 1970 and is more common in older women and in black women, according to a population-based, cross-sectional analysis.
Researchers analyzed data from more than 151 million women with delivery-related hospitalizations in the United States between 1970 and 2010 and found that the rate of chronic hypertension in pregnancy increased steadily over time from 1970 to 1990, plateaued from 1990 to 2000, then increased again to 2010.
The analysis revealed an average annual increase of 6% – which was higher among white women than among black women – and an overall 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010. These increases appeared to be independent of rates of obesity and smoking. The findings were published in Hypertension.
The rates of chronic hypertension also increased with maternal age, among both black and white women.
“The strong association between age and rates of chronic hypertension underscores the potential for both biological and social determinants of health to influence risk,” wrote Cande V. Ananth, PhD, from the Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J., and coauthors. “The period effect in chronic hypertension in pregnancy is thus largely a product of the age effect and the increasing mean age at first birth in the U.S.”
The overall prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy was 0.63%, but was twofold higher in black women, compared with white women (1.24% vs. 0.53%). The authors noted that black women experienced disproportionally higher rates of ischemic placental disease, pregestational and gestational diabetes, preterm delivery and perinatal mortality, which may be a consequences of higher rates of obesity, social disadvantage, smoking, and less access to care.
“This disparity may also be related to the higher tendency of black women to develop vascular disease at an earlier age than white women, which may also explain why the age-associated increase in chronic hypertension among black women is relatively smaller than white women,” they wrote. “The persistent race disparity in chronic hypertension is also a cause for continued concern and underscores the role of complex population dynamics that shape risks.”
This was the largest study to evaluate changes in the prevalence of chronic hypertension in pregnancy over time and particularly how the prevalence is influenced by age, period, and birth cohort.
In regard to the 13-fold increase from 1970 to 2010, the researchers suggested that changing diagnostic criteria for hypertension, as well as earlier access to prenatal care, may have played a part. For example, the American College of Cardiology recently modified their guidelines to include patients with systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 130-139 mm Hg and 80-89 mm Hg as stage 1 hypertension, which they noted would increase the prevalence rates of chronic hypertension during pregnancy.
The researchers reported having no outside funding and no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Ananth CV et al. Hypertension. 2019 Sept 9. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12968.
FROM HYPERTENSION
Abstracts Presented at the 2019 AVAHO Annual Meeting (Digital Edition)
Can we eradicate malaria by 2050?
A new report by members of the Lancet Commission on Malaria Eradication has called for ending malaria in Africa within a generation, specifically aiming at the year 2050.
The Lancet Commission on Malaria Eradication is a joint endeavor between The Lancet and the University of California, San Francisco, and was convened in 2017 to consider the feasibility and affordability of malaria eradication, as well as to identify priority actions for the achievement of the goal. Eradication was considered “a necessary one given the never-ending struggle against drug and insecticide resistance and the social and economic costs associated with a failure to eradicate.”
Between 2000 and 2017, the worldwide annual incidence of malaria declined by 36%, and the annual death rate declined by 60%, according to the report. In 2007, Bill and Melinda Gates proposed that controlling malaria was not enough and complete eradication was the only scientifically and ethically defensible objective. This goal was adopted by the World Health Organization and other interested parties, and by 2015, global strategies and a potential timeline for eradication were developed.
“Global progress has stalled since 2015 and the malaria community is now at a critical moment, faced with a decision to either temper its ambitions as it did in 1969 or recommit to an eradication goal,” according to the report.
In the report, the authors used new modeling analysis to estimate plausible scenarios for the distribution and intensity of malaria in 2030 and 2050. Socioeconomic and environmental trends, together with enhanced access to high-quality diagnosis, treatment, and vector control, could lead to a “world largely free of malaria” by 2050, but with pockets of low-level transmission persisting across a belt of Africa.
Current statistics lend weight to the promise of eventual eradication, according to the report.
Between 2000 and 2017, 20 countries – constituting about one-fifth of the 106 malaria-endemic countries in 2000 – eliminated malaria transmission within their borders, reporting zero indigenous malaria cases for at least 1 year. However, this was counterbalanced by the fact that between 2015 and 2017, 55 countries had an increase in cases, and 38 countries had an increase in deaths.
“The good news is that 38 countries had incidences of fewer than ten cases per 1,000 population in 2017, with 25 countries reporting fewer than one case per 1,000 population. The same 38 countries reported just 5% of total malaria deaths. Nearly all of these low-burden countries are actively working towards national and regional elimination goals of 2030 or earlier,” according to the report.
The analysis undertaken for the report consisted of the following four steps:
1. Development of a machine-learning model to capture associations between malaria endemicity data and a wide range of socioeconomic and environmental geospatial covariates.
2. Mapping of covariate estimates to the years 2030 and 2050 on the basis of projected global trends.
3. Application of the associations learned in the first step to projected covariates generated in the second step to estimate the possible future global landscape of malaria endemicity.
4. Use of a mathematical transmission model to explore the potential effect of differing levels of malaria interventions.
The report indicates that an annual spending of $6 billion or more is required, while the current global expenditure is approximately $4.3 billion. An additional investment of $2 billion per year is necessary, with a quarter of the funds coming from increased development assistance from external donors and the rest from government health spending in malaria-endemic countries, according to the report.
However, other areas of concern remain, including the current lack of effective and widely deployable outdoor biting technologies, though these are expected to be available within the next decade, according to the report.
In terms of the modeling used in the report, the authors noted that past performance does not “capture the effect of mass drug administration or mass chemoprevention because these interventions are either relatively new or have yet to be applied widely. These underestimates might be counteracted by the absence of drug or insecticide resistance from our projections,which result in overly optimistic estimates for the continued efficacy of current tools.”
The commission was launched in October 2017 by the Global Health Group at the University of California, San Francisco. The commission built on the 2010 Lancet Malaria Elimination Series, “which evaluated the operational, technical, and financial requirements for malaria elimination and helped shape and build early support for the eradication agenda,” according to the report.
SOURCE: Feachem RGA et al. Lancet. 2019 Sept 8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31139-0.
A new report by members of the Lancet Commission on Malaria Eradication has called for ending malaria in Africa within a generation, specifically aiming at the year 2050.
The Lancet Commission on Malaria Eradication is a joint endeavor between The Lancet and the University of California, San Francisco, and was convened in 2017 to consider the feasibility and affordability of malaria eradication, as well as to identify priority actions for the achievement of the goal. Eradication was considered “a necessary one given the never-ending struggle against drug and insecticide resistance and the social and economic costs associated with a failure to eradicate.”
Between 2000 and 2017, the worldwide annual incidence of malaria declined by 36%, and the annual death rate declined by 60%, according to the report. In 2007, Bill and Melinda Gates proposed that controlling malaria was not enough and complete eradication was the only scientifically and ethically defensible objective. This goal was adopted by the World Health Organization and other interested parties, and by 2015, global strategies and a potential timeline for eradication were developed.
“Global progress has stalled since 2015 and the malaria community is now at a critical moment, faced with a decision to either temper its ambitions as it did in 1969 or recommit to an eradication goal,” according to the report.
In the report, the authors used new modeling analysis to estimate plausible scenarios for the distribution and intensity of malaria in 2030 and 2050. Socioeconomic and environmental trends, together with enhanced access to high-quality diagnosis, treatment, and vector control, could lead to a “world largely free of malaria” by 2050, but with pockets of low-level transmission persisting across a belt of Africa.
Current statistics lend weight to the promise of eventual eradication, according to the report.
Between 2000 and 2017, 20 countries – constituting about one-fifth of the 106 malaria-endemic countries in 2000 – eliminated malaria transmission within their borders, reporting zero indigenous malaria cases for at least 1 year. However, this was counterbalanced by the fact that between 2015 and 2017, 55 countries had an increase in cases, and 38 countries had an increase in deaths.
“The good news is that 38 countries had incidences of fewer than ten cases per 1,000 population in 2017, with 25 countries reporting fewer than one case per 1,000 population. The same 38 countries reported just 5% of total malaria deaths. Nearly all of these low-burden countries are actively working towards national and regional elimination goals of 2030 or earlier,” according to the report.
The analysis undertaken for the report consisted of the following four steps:
1. Development of a machine-learning model to capture associations between malaria endemicity data and a wide range of socioeconomic and environmental geospatial covariates.
2. Mapping of covariate estimates to the years 2030 and 2050 on the basis of projected global trends.
3. Application of the associations learned in the first step to projected covariates generated in the second step to estimate the possible future global landscape of malaria endemicity.
4. Use of a mathematical transmission model to explore the potential effect of differing levels of malaria interventions.
The report indicates that an annual spending of $6 billion or more is required, while the current global expenditure is approximately $4.3 billion. An additional investment of $2 billion per year is necessary, with a quarter of the funds coming from increased development assistance from external donors and the rest from government health spending in malaria-endemic countries, according to the report.
However, other areas of concern remain, including the current lack of effective and widely deployable outdoor biting technologies, though these are expected to be available within the next decade, according to the report.
In terms of the modeling used in the report, the authors noted that past performance does not “capture the effect of mass drug administration or mass chemoprevention because these interventions are either relatively new or have yet to be applied widely. These underestimates might be counteracted by the absence of drug or insecticide resistance from our projections,which result in overly optimistic estimates for the continued efficacy of current tools.”
The commission was launched in October 2017 by the Global Health Group at the University of California, San Francisco. The commission built on the 2010 Lancet Malaria Elimination Series, “which evaluated the operational, technical, and financial requirements for malaria elimination and helped shape and build early support for the eradication agenda,” according to the report.
SOURCE: Feachem RGA et al. Lancet. 2019 Sept 8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31139-0.
A new report by members of the Lancet Commission on Malaria Eradication has called for ending malaria in Africa within a generation, specifically aiming at the year 2050.
The Lancet Commission on Malaria Eradication is a joint endeavor between The Lancet and the University of California, San Francisco, and was convened in 2017 to consider the feasibility and affordability of malaria eradication, as well as to identify priority actions for the achievement of the goal. Eradication was considered “a necessary one given the never-ending struggle against drug and insecticide resistance and the social and economic costs associated with a failure to eradicate.”
Between 2000 and 2017, the worldwide annual incidence of malaria declined by 36%, and the annual death rate declined by 60%, according to the report. In 2007, Bill and Melinda Gates proposed that controlling malaria was not enough and complete eradication was the only scientifically and ethically defensible objective. This goal was adopted by the World Health Organization and other interested parties, and by 2015, global strategies and a potential timeline for eradication were developed.
“Global progress has stalled since 2015 and the malaria community is now at a critical moment, faced with a decision to either temper its ambitions as it did in 1969 or recommit to an eradication goal,” according to the report.
In the report, the authors used new modeling analysis to estimate plausible scenarios for the distribution and intensity of malaria in 2030 and 2050. Socioeconomic and environmental trends, together with enhanced access to high-quality diagnosis, treatment, and vector control, could lead to a “world largely free of malaria” by 2050, but with pockets of low-level transmission persisting across a belt of Africa.
Current statistics lend weight to the promise of eventual eradication, according to the report.
Between 2000 and 2017, 20 countries – constituting about one-fifth of the 106 malaria-endemic countries in 2000 – eliminated malaria transmission within their borders, reporting zero indigenous malaria cases for at least 1 year. However, this was counterbalanced by the fact that between 2015 and 2017, 55 countries had an increase in cases, and 38 countries had an increase in deaths.
“The good news is that 38 countries had incidences of fewer than ten cases per 1,000 population in 2017, with 25 countries reporting fewer than one case per 1,000 population. The same 38 countries reported just 5% of total malaria deaths. Nearly all of these low-burden countries are actively working towards national and regional elimination goals of 2030 or earlier,” according to the report.
The analysis undertaken for the report consisted of the following four steps:
1. Development of a machine-learning model to capture associations between malaria endemicity data and a wide range of socioeconomic and environmental geospatial covariates.
2. Mapping of covariate estimates to the years 2030 and 2050 on the basis of projected global trends.
3. Application of the associations learned in the first step to projected covariates generated in the second step to estimate the possible future global landscape of malaria endemicity.
4. Use of a mathematical transmission model to explore the potential effect of differing levels of malaria interventions.
The report indicates that an annual spending of $6 billion or more is required, while the current global expenditure is approximately $4.3 billion. An additional investment of $2 billion per year is necessary, with a quarter of the funds coming from increased development assistance from external donors and the rest from government health spending in malaria-endemic countries, according to the report.
However, other areas of concern remain, including the current lack of effective and widely deployable outdoor biting technologies, though these are expected to be available within the next decade, according to the report.
In terms of the modeling used in the report, the authors noted that past performance does not “capture the effect of mass drug administration or mass chemoprevention because these interventions are either relatively new or have yet to be applied widely. These underestimates might be counteracted by the absence of drug or insecticide resistance from our projections,which result in overly optimistic estimates for the continued efficacy of current tools.”
The commission was launched in October 2017 by the Global Health Group at the University of California, San Francisco. The commission built on the 2010 Lancet Malaria Elimination Series, “which evaluated the operational, technical, and financial requirements for malaria elimination and helped shape and build early support for the eradication agenda,” according to the report.
SOURCE: Feachem RGA et al. Lancet. 2019 Sept 8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31139-0.
FROM THE LANCET
Chemotherapy may raise CVD risk in pediatric cancer survivors
Pediatric cancer survivors have a higher likelihood of experiencing a cardiac event, developing diabetes, or having hypertension at a median 10-year follow-up, according to results from a recent research letter published in Circulation.
Ashna Khanna of the University of Toronto and colleagues identified 7,289 pediatric patients in the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System who were diagnosed with cancer at median age of 7 years old, who were treated between 1987 and 2010, and who were cancer survivors for 5 years. Each patient was matched to five cancer-free control subjects who were a median of 24 years old at the 10-year follow-up (36,205 cancer-free individuals). The researchers studied whether pediatric cancer survivors experienced cardiac events, such as heart failure, arrhythmia, pericardial disease, valvular disease, or coronary artery disease. They also evaluated the incidence of diabetes and hypertension in each group.
Of the children who survived cancer, 2.8% (n = 203) experienced at least one cardiac event versus 0.9% of controls (P less than .001). The cancer survivors experienced 3.2 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.6), compared with the control group in which there was a rate of 0.9 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.9-1.9).
With regard to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, associated factors included cancer relapse or subsequent cancer (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and a 250-mg/m2 or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy, compared with a dose of less than 250 mg/m2 or no anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9). Patients who developed diabetes mellitus before a CVD diagnosis were also at higher risk of CVD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8).
Heart failure risk was also statistically significant in patients with relapse and subsequent childhood cancer (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), a 250-mg/m2 or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.5-16.6), diabetes (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.8-10.7), and hypertension (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.9).
“While anthracycline chemotherapy may induce heart disease, many patients require this cancer treatment to survive,” Paul Nathan, MD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada and a study coauthor said in a statement. “Doctors should address heart disease risk factors – such as diabetes and hypertension – that can be modified.”
This study was funded in part from a grant by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Several authors reported support from noncommercial sources. The other authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Khanna A et al. Circulation. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041403.
Pediatric cancer survivors have a higher likelihood of experiencing a cardiac event, developing diabetes, or having hypertension at a median 10-year follow-up, according to results from a recent research letter published in Circulation.
Ashna Khanna of the University of Toronto and colleagues identified 7,289 pediatric patients in the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System who were diagnosed with cancer at median age of 7 years old, who were treated between 1987 and 2010, and who were cancer survivors for 5 years. Each patient was matched to five cancer-free control subjects who were a median of 24 years old at the 10-year follow-up (36,205 cancer-free individuals). The researchers studied whether pediatric cancer survivors experienced cardiac events, such as heart failure, arrhythmia, pericardial disease, valvular disease, or coronary artery disease. They also evaluated the incidence of diabetes and hypertension in each group.
Of the children who survived cancer, 2.8% (n = 203) experienced at least one cardiac event versus 0.9% of controls (P less than .001). The cancer survivors experienced 3.2 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.6), compared with the control group in which there was a rate of 0.9 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.9-1.9).
With regard to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, associated factors included cancer relapse or subsequent cancer (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and a 250-mg/m2 or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy, compared with a dose of less than 250 mg/m2 or no anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9). Patients who developed diabetes mellitus before a CVD diagnosis were also at higher risk of CVD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8).
Heart failure risk was also statistically significant in patients with relapse and subsequent childhood cancer (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), a 250-mg/m2 or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.5-16.6), diabetes (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.8-10.7), and hypertension (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.9).
“While anthracycline chemotherapy may induce heart disease, many patients require this cancer treatment to survive,” Paul Nathan, MD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada and a study coauthor said in a statement. “Doctors should address heart disease risk factors – such as diabetes and hypertension – that can be modified.”
This study was funded in part from a grant by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Several authors reported support from noncommercial sources. The other authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Khanna A et al. Circulation. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041403.
Pediatric cancer survivors have a higher likelihood of experiencing a cardiac event, developing diabetes, or having hypertension at a median 10-year follow-up, according to results from a recent research letter published in Circulation.
Ashna Khanna of the University of Toronto and colleagues identified 7,289 pediatric patients in the Pediatric Oncology Group of Ontario Networked Information System who were diagnosed with cancer at median age of 7 years old, who were treated between 1987 and 2010, and who were cancer survivors for 5 years. Each patient was matched to five cancer-free control subjects who were a median of 24 years old at the 10-year follow-up (36,205 cancer-free individuals). The researchers studied whether pediatric cancer survivors experienced cardiac events, such as heart failure, arrhythmia, pericardial disease, valvular disease, or coronary artery disease. They also evaluated the incidence of diabetes and hypertension in each group.
Of the children who survived cancer, 2.8% (n = 203) experienced at least one cardiac event versus 0.9% of controls (P less than .001). The cancer survivors experienced 3.2 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.8-3.6), compared with the control group in which there was a rate of 0.9 cardiac events per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.9-1.9).
With regard to cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, associated factors included cancer relapse or subsequent cancer (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and a 250-mg/m2 or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy, compared with a dose of less than 250 mg/m2 or no anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9). Patients who developed diabetes mellitus before a CVD diagnosis were also at higher risk of CVD (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.8).
Heart failure risk was also statistically significant in patients with relapse and subsequent childhood cancer (HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), a 250-mg/m2 or greater dose of doxorubicin-equivalent anthracycline chemotherapy (HR, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.5-16.6), diabetes (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.8-10.7), and hypertension (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.9).
“While anthracycline chemotherapy may induce heart disease, many patients require this cancer treatment to survive,” Paul Nathan, MD, of the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada and a study coauthor said in a statement. “Doctors should address heart disease risk factors – such as diabetes and hypertension – that can be modified.”
This study was funded in part from a grant by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Several authors reported support from noncommercial sources. The other authors reported having no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Khanna A et al. Circulation. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041403.
FROM CIRCULATION
U.S. and African programs aim to improve understanding, treatment of sickle cell disease
Researchers are leading several programs designed to serve the sickle cell community in the United States and sub-Saharan Africa, officials at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) said during a recent webinar.
One program based in the United States is focused on building a registry for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and conducting studies designed to improve SCD care. Another program involves building “an information-sharing network and patient-powered registry” in the United States.
The programs in sub-Saharan Africa were designed to establish a database of SCD patients, optimize the use of hydroxyurea in children with SCD, and aid genomic studies of SCD.
W. Keith Hoots, MD, director of the Division of Blood Diseases and Resources at NHLBI, began the webinar with an overview of the programs in sub-Saharan Africa. He described four programs with sites in nine countries (Angola, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda).
SPARCO and SADaCC
Dr. Hoots outlined the scope the Sickle Pan-African Research Consortium (SPARCO) and the Sickle Africa Data Coordinating Center (SADaCC), both part of the Sickle In Africa consortium.
A major goal of SPARCO and SADaCC is to create a Research Electronic Data Capture database that encompasses SCD patients in sub-Saharan Africa. As of April 2019, the database included 6,578 patients. The target is 13,000 patients.
Other goals of SPARCO and SADaCC are to “harmonize” SCD phenotype definitions and ontologies, create clinical guidelines for SCD management in sub-Saharan Africa, plan future cohort studies, and develop programs for newborn screening, infection prevention, and increased use of hydroxyurea.
“So far, they’re well along in establishing a registry and a database system,” Dr. Hoots said. “They’ve agreed on the database elements, phenotype definitions, and ontologies, they’ve developed some regionally appropriate clinical management guidelines, and they’ve begun skills development on the ground at all respective sites.”
REACH
Another program Dr. Hoots discussed is Realizing Effectiveness Across Continents With Hydroxyurea (REACH), a phase 1/2 pilot study of hydroxyurea in children (aged 1-10 years) with SCD in sub-Saharan Africa.
The goals of REACH are to determine the optimal dose of hydroxyurea in this population; teach African physicians how to administer hydroxyurea; assess the safety, feasibility, and benefits of hydroxyurea; study variability in response to hydroxyurea; gather data for the Research Electronic Data Capture database; and establish a research infrastructure for future collaborations.
Results from more than 600 children enrolled in REACH were presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine (N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10; 380[2]:121-31).
SickleGenAfrica
SickleGenAfrica is part of the H3Africa consortium and aims to “build capacity for genomic research in Africa,” Dr. Hoots said.
Under this program, researchers will conduct three studies to test the hypothesis that genetic variation affects the defense against hemolysis and organ damage in patients with SCD. The researchers will study existing cohorts of SCD patients including children and adults.
Other goals of SickleGenAfrica are to establish a molecular hematology and sickle cell mouse core, an SCD biorepository core, a bioinformatics core, and an administrative core for the coordination of activities. The program will also be used to train “future science leaders” in SCD research, Dr. Hoots said.
SCDIC
Cheryl Anne Boyce, PhD, chief of the Implementation Science Branch at the Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science at NHLBI, discussed the United States–based Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC).
“The goals of the consortium are to develop a registry in collaboration with other centers and the NHLBI, as well as a needs-based community assessment of the barriers to care for subjects with sickle cell disease,” Dr. Boyce said. “We also wanted to design implementation research studies that address the identified barriers to care.”
Dr. Boyce said the SCDIC’s registry is open to patients aged 15-45 years who have a confirmed SCD diagnosis, speak English, and are able to consent to and complete a survey. The registry has enrolled almost 2,400 patients from eight centers over 18 months.
The SCDIC has also performed a needs assessment that prompted the development of three implementation research studies. The first study involves using mobile health interventions to, ideally, increase patient adherence to hydroxyurea and improve provider knowledge of hydroxyurea.
With the second study, researchers aim to improve the care of SCD patients in the emergency department by using an inpatient portal. The goals of the third study are to establish a standard definition for unaffiliated patients, conduct a needs assessment for this group, and develop an intervention that can provide these patients with guideline-based SCD care.
Get Connected
Kim Smith-Whitley, MD, director of the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a board member of the Sickle Cell Disease Association of America (SCDAA), described Get Connected, “an information-sharing network and patient-powered registry” created by SCDAA.
Dr. Smith-Whitley said one purpose of Get Connected is to provide a network that facilitates “the distribution of information related to clinical care, research, health services, health policy, and advocacy.”
The network is open to families living with SCD and sickle cell trait, SCDAA member organizations, health care providers, clinical researchers, and community-based organizations.
Get Connected also includes a registry for SCD patients that stores information on their diagnosis and treatment, as well as online communities that can be used to share information and provide psychosocial support.
Thus far, Get Connected has enrolled 6,329 individuals. This includes 5,100 children and adults with SCD, 652 children and adults with sickle cell trait, and 577 nonpatients.
The webinar presenters did not disclose any conflicts of interest.
Researchers are leading several programs designed to serve the sickle cell community in the United States and sub-Saharan Africa, officials at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) said during a recent webinar.
One program based in the United States is focused on building a registry for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and conducting studies designed to improve SCD care. Another program involves building “an information-sharing network and patient-powered registry” in the United States.
The programs in sub-Saharan Africa were designed to establish a database of SCD patients, optimize the use of hydroxyurea in children with SCD, and aid genomic studies of SCD.
W. Keith Hoots, MD, director of the Division of Blood Diseases and Resources at NHLBI, began the webinar with an overview of the programs in sub-Saharan Africa. He described four programs with sites in nine countries (Angola, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda).
SPARCO and SADaCC
Dr. Hoots outlined the scope the Sickle Pan-African Research Consortium (SPARCO) and the Sickle Africa Data Coordinating Center (SADaCC), both part of the Sickle In Africa consortium.
A major goal of SPARCO and SADaCC is to create a Research Electronic Data Capture database that encompasses SCD patients in sub-Saharan Africa. As of April 2019, the database included 6,578 patients. The target is 13,000 patients.
Other goals of SPARCO and SADaCC are to “harmonize” SCD phenotype definitions and ontologies, create clinical guidelines for SCD management in sub-Saharan Africa, plan future cohort studies, and develop programs for newborn screening, infection prevention, and increased use of hydroxyurea.
“So far, they’re well along in establishing a registry and a database system,” Dr. Hoots said. “They’ve agreed on the database elements, phenotype definitions, and ontologies, they’ve developed some regionally appropriate clinical management guidelines, and they’ve begun skills development on the ground at all respective sites.”
REACH
Another program Dr. Hoots discussed is Realizing Effectiveness Across Continents With Hydroxyurea (REACH), a phase 1/2 pilot study of hydroxyurea in children (aged 1-10 years) with SCD in sub-Saharan Africa.
The goals of REACH are to determine the optimal dose of hydroxyurea in this population; teach African physicians how to administer hydroxyurea; assess the safety, feasibility, and benefits of hydroxyurea; study variability in response to hydroxyurea; gather data for the Research Electronic Data Capture database; and establish a research infrastructure for future collaborations.
Results from more than 600 children enrolled in REACH were presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine (N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10; 380[2]:121-31).
SickleGenAfrica
SickleGenAfrica is part of the H3Africa consortium and aims to “build capacity for genomic research in Africa,” Dr. Hoots said.
Under this program, researchers will conduct three studies to test the hypothesis that genetic variation affects the defense against hemolysis and organ damage in patients with SCD. The researchers will study existing cohorts of SCD patients including children and adults.
Other goals of SickleGenAfrica are to establish a molecular hematology and sickle cell mouse core, an SCD biorepository core, a bioinformatics core, and an administrative core for the coordination of activities. The program will also be used to train “future science leaders” in SCD research, Dr. Hoots said.
SCDIC
Cheryl Anne Boyce, PhD, chief of the Implementation Science Branch at the Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science at NHLBI, discussed the United States–based Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC).
“The goals of the consortium are to develop a registry in collaboration with other centers and the NHLBI, as well as a needs-based community assessment of the barriers to care for subjects with sickle cell disease,” Dr. Boyce said. “We also wanted to design implementation research studies that address the identified barriers to care.”
Dr. Boyce said the SCDIC’s registry is open to patients aged 15-45 years who have a confirmed SCD diagnosis, speak English, and are able to consent to and complete a survey. The registry has enrolled almost 2,400 patients from eight centers over 18 months.
The SCDIC has also performed a needs assessment that prompted the development of three implementation research studies. The first study involves using mobile health interventions to, ideally, increase patient adherence to hydroxyurea and improve provider knowledge of hydroxyurea.
With the second study, researchers aim to improve the care of SCD patients in the emergency department by using an inpatient portal. The goals of the third study are to establish a standard definition for unaffiliated patients, conduct a needs assessment for this group, and develop an intervention that can provide these patients with guideline-based SCD care.
Get Connected
Kim Smith-Whitley, MD, director of the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a board member of the Sickle Cell Disease Association of America (SCDAA), described Get Connected, “an information-sharing network and patient-powered registry” created by SCDAA.
Dr. Smith-Whitley said one purpose of Get Connected is to provide a network that facilitates “the distribution of information related to clinical care, research, health services, health policy, and advocacy.”
The network is open to families living with SCD and sickle cell trait, SCDAA member organizations, health care providers, clinical researchers, and community-based organizations.
Get Connected also includes a registry for SCD patients that stores information on their diagnosis and treatment, as well as online communities that can be used to share information and provide psychosocial support.
Thus far, Get Connected has enrolled 6,329 individuals. This includes 5,100 children and adults with SCD, 652 children and adults with sickle cell trait, and 577 nonpatients.
The webinar presenters did not disclose any conflicts of interest.
Researchers are leading several programs designed to serve the sickle cell community in the United States and sub-Saharan Africa, officials at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) said during a recent webinar.
One program based in the United States is focused on building a registry for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and conducting studies designed to improve SCD care. Another program involves building “an information-sharing network and patient-powered registry” in the United States.
The programs in sub-Saharan Africa were designed to establish a database of SCD patients, optimize the use of hydroxyurea in children with SCD, and aid genomic studies of SCD.
W. Keith Hoots, MD, director of the Division of Blood Diseases and Resources at NHLBI, began the webinar with an overview of the programs in sub-Saharan Africa. He described four programs with sites in nine countries (Angola, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uganda).
SPARCO and SADaCC
Dr. Hoots outlined the scope the Sickle Pan-African Research Consortium (SPARCO) and the Sickle Africa Data Coordinating Center (SADaCC), both part of the Sickle In Africa consortium.
A major goal of SPARCO and SADaCC is to create a Research Electronic Data Capture database that encompasses SCD patients in sub-Saharan Africa. As of April 2019, the database included 6,578 patients. The target is 13,000 patients.
Other goals of SPARCO and SADaCC are to “harmonize” SCD phenotype definitions and ontologies, create clinical guidelines for SCD management in sub-Saharan Africa, plan future cohort studies, and develop programs for newborn screening, infection prevention, and increased use of hydroxyurea.
“So far, they’re well along in establishing a registry and a database system,” Dr. Hoots said. “They’ve agreed on the database elements, phenotype definitions, and ontologies, they’ve developed some regionally appropriate clinical management guidelines, and they’ve begun skills development on the ground at all respective sites.”
REACH
Another program Dr. Hoots discussed is Realizing Effectiveness Across Continents With Hydroxyurea (REACH), a phase 1/2 pilot study of hydroxyurea in children (aged 1-10 years) with SCD in sub-Saharan Africa.
The goals of REACH are to determine the optimal dose of hydroxyurea in this population; teach African physicians how to administer hydroxyurea; assess the safety, feasibility, and benefits of hydroxyurea; study variability in response to hydroxyurea; gather data for the Research Electronic Data Capture database; and establish a research infrastructure for future collaborations.
Results from more than 600 children enrolled in REACH were presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine (N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10; 380[2]:121-31).
SickleGenAfrica
SickleGenAfrica is part of the H3Africa consortium and aims to “build capacity for genomic research in Africa,” Dr. Hoots said.
Under this program, researchers will conduct three studies to test the hypothesis that genetic variation affects the defense against hemolysis and organ damage in patients with SCD. The researchers will study existing cohorts of SCD patients including children and adults.
Other goals of SickleGenAfrica are to establish a molecular hematology and sickle cell mouse core, an SCD biorepository core, a bioinformatics core, and an administrative core for the coordination of activities. The program will also be used to train “future science leaders” in SCD research, Dr. Hoots said.
SCDIC
Cheryl Anne Boyce, PhD, chief of the Implementation Science Branch at the Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science at NHLBI, discussed the United States–based Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium (SCDIC).
“The goals of the consortium are to develop a registry in collaboration with other centers and the NHLBI, as well as a needs-based community assessment of the barriers to care for subjects with sickle cell disease,” Dr. Boyce said. “We also wanted to design implementation research studies that address the identified barriers to care.”
Dr. Boyce said the SCDIC’s registry is open to patients aged 15-45 years who have a confirmed SCD diagnosis, speak English, and are able to consent to and complete a survey. The registry has enrolled almost 2,400 patients from eight centers over 18 months.
The SCDIC has also performed a needs assessment that prompted the development of three implementation research studies. The first study involves using mobile health interventions to, ideally, increase patient adherence to hydroxyurea and improve provider knowledge of hydroxyurea.
With the second study, researchers aim to improve the care of SCD patients in the emergency department by using an inpatient portal. The goals of the third study are to establish a standard definition for unaffiliated patients, conduct a needs assessment for this group, and develop an intervention that can provide these patients with guideline-based SCD care.
Get Connected
Kim Smith-Whitley, MD, director of the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Center at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a board member of the Sickle Cell Disease Association of America (SCDAA), described Get Connected, “an information-sharing network and patient-powered registry” created by SCDAA.
Dr. Smith-Whitley said one purpose of Get Connected is to provide a network that facilitates “the distribution of information related to clinical care, research, health services, health policy, and advocacy.”
The network is open to families living with SCD and sickle cell trait, SCDAA member organizations, health care providers, clinical researchers, and community-based organizations.
Get Connected also includes a registry for SCD patients that stores information on their diagnosis and treatment, as well as online communities that can be used to share information and provide psychosocial support.
Thus far, Get Connected has enrolled 6,329 individuals. This includes 5,100 children and adults with SCD, 652 children and adults with sickle cell trait, and 577 nonpatients.
The webinar presenters did not disclose any conflicts of interest.
Pediatric HSCT recipients still risking sunburn
Young people who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are more likely to wear hats, sunscreen and other sun protection, but still intentionally tan and experience sunburn at the same rate as their peers, new research suggests.
In a survey‐based, cross‐sectional cohort study, researchers compared sun-protection behaviors and sun exposure in 85 children aged 21 years and younger who had undergone HSCT and 85 age-, sex-, and skin type–matched controls. The findings were published in Pediatric Dermatology.
HSCT recipients have a higher risk of long-term complications such as skin cancer, for which sun exposure is a major modifiable environmental risk factor.
“Therefore, consistent sun avoidance and protection as well as regular dermatologic evaluations are important for HSCT recipients,” wrote Edward B. Li, PhD, from Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors.
The survey found no significant difference between the transplant and control group in the amount of intentional sun exposure, such as the amount of time spent outside on weekdays and weekends during the peak sun intensity hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. More than one in five transplant recipients (21.2%) reported spending at least 3 hours a day outside between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, as did 36.5% of transplant recipients on weekends.
There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of time spent tanning, either in the sun or in a tanning bed. Additionally, a similar number of transplant recipients and controls experienced one or more red or painful sunburns in the past year (25.9% vs. 27.1%).
However, transplant patients did practice better sun protection behaviors than did the control group, with 60% reporting that they always wore sunscreen, compared with 29.4% of controls. The transplant recipients were also significantly more likely to wear sunglasses and a hat and to stay in the shade or use an umbrella.
“While these data may reflect that HSCT patients are not practicing adequate sun avoidance, it may also suggest that these long‐term survivors are able to enjoy being outdoors as much as their peers and have a similar desire to have a tanned appearance,” the researchers wrote. “While a healthy and active lifestyle should be encouraged for all children, our results emphasize the need for pediatric HSCT survivors to be educated on their increased risk for UV‐related skin cancers, counseled on avoidance of intentional tanning, and advised on the importance of sun protection behaviors in an effort to improve long-term outcomes.”
The researchers noted that transplant recipients were significantly more likely to have had a full body skin exam from a health care professional than were individuals in the control group (61.2% vs. 4.7%) and were more likely to have done a self-check or been checked by a partner in the previous year.
The study was supported by the Society for Pediatric Dermatology, the Dermatology Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation. One author declared a financial interest in a company developing a dermatological product. No other conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Li EB et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13984.
Young people who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are more likely to wear hats, sunscreen and other sun protection, but still intentionally tan and experience sunburn at the same rate as their peers, new research suggests.
In a survey‐based, cross‐sectional cohort study, researchers compared sun-protection behaviors and sun exposure in 85 children aged 21 years and younger who had undergone HSCT and 85 age-, sex-, and skin type–matched controls. The findings were published in Pediatric Dermatology.
HSCT recipients have a higher risk of long-term complications such as skin cancer, for which sun exposure is a major modifiable environmental risk factor.
“Therefore, consistent sun avoidance and protection as well as regular dermatologic evaluations are important for HSCT recipients,” wrote Edward B. Li, PhD, from Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors.
The survey found no significant difference between the transplant and control group in the amount of intentional sun exposure, such as the amount of time spent outside on weekdays and weekends during the peak sun intensity hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. More than one in five transplant recipients (21.2%) reported spending at least 3 hours a day outside between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, as did 36.5% of transplant recipients on weekends.
There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of time spent tanning, either in the sun or in a tanning bed. Additionally, a similar number of transplant recipients and controls experienced one or more red or painful sunburns in the past year (25.9% vs. 27.1%).
However, transplant patients did practice better sun protection behaviors than did the control group, with 60% reporting that they always wore sunscreen, compared with 29.4% of controls. The transplant recipients were also significantly more likely to wear sunglasses and a hat and to stay in the shade or use an umbrella.
“While these data may reflect that HSCT patients are not practicing adequate sun avoidance, it may also suggest that these long‐term survivors are able to enjoy being outdoors as much as their peers and have a similar desire to have a tanned appearance,” the researchers wrote. “While a healthy and active lifestyle should be encouraged for all children, our results emphasize the need for pediatric HSCT survivors to be educated on their increased risk for UV‐related skin cancers, counseled on avoidance of intentional tanning, and advised on the importance of sun protection behaviors in an effort to improve long-term outcomes.”
The researchers noted that transplant recipients were significantly more likely to have had a full body skin exam from a health care professional than were individuals in the control group (61.2% vs. 4.7%) and were more likely to have done a self-check or been checked by a partner in the previous year.
The study was supported by the Society for Pediatric Dermatology, the Dermatology Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation. One author declared a financial interest in a company developing a dermatological product. No other conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Li EB et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13984.
Young people who have received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are more likely to wear hats, sunscreen and other sun protection, but still intentionally tan and experience sunburn at the same rate as their peers, new research suggests.
In a survey‐based, cross‐sectional cohort study, researchers compared sun-protection behaviors and sun exposure in 85 children aged 21 years and younger who had undergone HSCT and 85 age-, sex-, and skin type–matched controls. The findings were published in Pediatric Dermatology.
HSCT recipients have a higher risk of long-term complications such as skin cancer, for which sun exposure is a major modifiable environmental risk factor.
“Therefore, consistent sun avoidance and protection as well as regular dermatologic evaluations are important for HSCT recipients,” wrote Edward B. Li, PhD, from Harvard Medical School, Boston, and coauthors.
The survey found no significant difference between the transplant and control group in the amount of intentional sun exposure, such as the amount of time spent outside on weekdays and weekends during the peak sun intensity hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. More than one in five transplant recipients (21.2%) reported spending at least 3 hours a day outside between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on weekdays, as did 36.5% of transplant recipients on weekends.
There were also no significant differences between the two groups in terms of time spent tanning, either in the sun or in a tanning bed. Additionally, a similar number of transplant recipients and controls experienced one or more red or painful sunburns in the past year (25.9% vs. 27.1%).
However, transplant patients did practice better sun protection behaviors than did the control group, with 60% reporting that they always wore sunscreen, compared with 29.4% of controls. The transplant recipients were also significantly more likely to wear sunglasses and a hat and to stay in the shade or use an umbrella.
“While these data may reflect that HSCT patients are not practicing adequate sun avoidance, it may also suggest that these long‐term survivors are able to enjoy being outdoors as much as their peers and have a similar desire to have a tanned appearance,” the researchers wrote. “While a healthy and active lifestyle should be encouraged for all children, our results emphasize the need for pediatric HSCT survivors to be educated on their increased risk for UV‐related skin cancers, counseled on avoidance of intentional tanning, and advised on the importance of sun protection behaviors in an effort to improve long-term outcomes.”
The researchers noted that transplant recipients were significantly more likely to have had a full body skin exam from a health care professional than were individuals in the control group (61.2% vs. 4.7%) and were more likely to have done a self-check or been checked by a partner in the previous year.
The study was supported by the Society for Pediatric Dermatology, the Dermatology Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation. One author declared a financial interest in a company developing a dermatological product. No other conflicts of interest were declared.
SOURCE: Li EB et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Aug 13. doi: 10.1111/pde.13984.
FROM PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGY
IASLC survey: Ongoing and intensified molecular testing education needed globally
BARCELONA – Molecular testing to guide treatment in patients with lung cancer remains underused, and awareness of related evidence-based guidelines is suboptimal, results of an international survey suggest.
Overall, 61% of the 2,537 respondents from 102 countries and across multiple relevant medical specialties reported that molecular testing rates in their country were less than 50%, with the lowest rates reported in Latin America. And 33% of those requesting molecular testing said they were unaware of the most updated guidelines supporting the use of such testing in lung cancer, Matthew Smeltzer, PhD, of the University of Memphis (Tenn.) reported during a press conference at the World Conference on Lung Cancer.
The findings from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Global Survey on Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer also showed that 41% of respondents who perform or interpret molecular testing assays report being dissatisfied with the conditions of molecular testing in their country, 17% said they feel that patients are not satisfied, and 35% said they aren’t sure about the state of testing in their country.
Specific concerns reported by respondents included trouble understanding results, the time it takes to receive the results, and the reliability of samples.
The top five barriers to molecular testing included cost, quality, access, awareness, and time, Dr. Smeltzer said at the meeting which is sponsored by the IASLC.
“These five were the same five top barriers in each region of the world,” he said, noting that the ordering of the barriers differed somewhat among regions.
The survey included a seven-question introduction, with 32 additional questions for respondents who request tests and treat patients, 45 questions on performing and interpreting assays, and 24 questions on tissue acquisition. Additionally, all respondents were asked to list barriers that impede their country’s ability to offer molecular testing.
“I’d say we got a pretty good geographic distribution of responses; 56% of these responses were from developing countries, 44% from developed countries,” he said, noting that medical oncologists constituted the highest percentage of respondents, followed by pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, and other scientists.
When asked specifically what would prompt molecular testing, respondents most often listed adenocarcinoma, never-smoker status, female gender, and young age, Dr. Smeltzer said.
“Overall, we’re still finding that many in the lung cancer community are not satisfied with the current state of molecular testing. We’ve got suboptimal awareness of the evidence-based guidelines. We have barriers that remain to molecular testing, which we’ve identified, and [we’re] recommending continuous education around molecular testing, and that should be intensified on a national and international level to ensure that patients receive optimal therapy,” he concluded.
The IASLC survey was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr. Smeltzer reported receiving research support from the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation.
BARCELONA – Molecular testing to guide treatment in patients with lung cancer remains underused, and awareness of related evidence-based guidelines is suboptimal, results of an international survey suggest.
Overall, 61% of the 2,537 respondents from 102 countries and across multiple relevant medical specialties reported that molecular testing rates in their country were less than 50%, with the lowest rates reported in Latin America. And 33% of those requesting molecular testing said they were unaware of the most updated guidelines supporting the use of such testing in lung cancer, Matthew Smeltzer, PhD, of the University of Memphis (Tenn.) reported during a press conference at the World Conference on Lung Cancer.
The findings from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Global Survey on Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer also showed that 41% of respondents who perform or interpret molecular testing assays report being dissatisfied with the conditions of molecular testing in their country, 17% said they feel that patients are not satisfied, and 35% said they aren’t sure about the state of testing in their country.
Specific concerns reported by respondents included trouble understanding results, the time it takes to receive the results, and the reliability of samples.
The top five barriers to molecular testing included cost, quality, access, awareness, and time, Dr. Smeltzer said at the meeting which is sponsored by the IASLC.
“These five were the same five top barriers in each region of the world,” he said, noting that the ordering of the barriers differed somewhat among regions.
The survey included a seven-question introduction, with 32 additional questions for respondents who request tests and treat patients, 45 questions on performing and interpreting assays, and 24 questions on tissue acquisition. Additionally, all respondents were asked to list barriers that impede their country’s ability to offer molecular testing.
“I’d say we got a pretty good geographic distribution of responses; 56% of these responses were from developing countries, 44% from developed countries,” he said, noting that medical oncologists constituted the highest percentage of respondents, followed by pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, and other scientists.
When asked specifically what would prompt molecular testing, respondents most often listed adenocarcinoma, never-smoker status, female gender, and young age, Dr. Smeltzer said.
“Overall, we’re still finding that many in the lung cancer community are not satisfied with the current state of molecular testing. We’ve got suboptimal awareness of the evidence-based guidelines. We have barriers that remain to molecular testing, which we’ve identified, and [we’re] recommending continuous education around molecular testing, and that should be intensified on a national and international level to ensure that patients receive optimal therapy,” he concluded.
The IASLC survey was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr. Smeltzer reported receiving research support from the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation.
BARCELONA – Molecular testing to guide treatment in patients with lung cancer remains underused, and awareness of related evidence-based guidelines is suboptimal, results of an international survey suggest.
Overall, 61% of the 2,537 respondents from 102 countries and across multiple relevant medical specialties reported that molecular testing rates in their country were less than 50%, with the lowest rates reported in Latin America. And 33% of those requesting molecular testing said they were unaware of the most updated guidelines supporting the use of such testing in lung cancer, Matthew Smeltzer, PhD, of the University of Memphis (Tenn.) reported during a press conference at the World Conference on Lung Cancer.
The findings from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Global Survey on Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer also showed that 41% of respondents who perform or interpret molecular testing assays report being dissatisfied with the conditions of molecular testing in their country, 17% said they feel that patients are not satisfied, and 35% said they aren’t sure about the state of testing in their country.
Specific concerns reported by respondents included trouble understanding results, the time it takes to receive the results, and the reliability of samples.
The top five barriers to molecular testing included cost, quality, access, awareness, and time, Dr. Smeltzer said at the meeting which is sponsored by the IASLC.
“These five were the same five top barriers in each region of the world,” he said, noting that the ordering of the barriers differed somewhat among regions.
The survey included a seven-question introduction, with 32 additional questions for respondents who request tests and treat patients, 45 questions on performing and interpreting assays, and 24 questions on tissue acquisition. Additionally, all respondents were asked to list barriers that impede their country’s ability to offer molecular testing.
“I’d say we got a pretty good geographic distribution of responses; 56% of these responses were from developing countries, 44% from developed countries,” he said, noting that medical oncologists constituted the highest percentage of respondents, followed by pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, pathologists, and other scientists.
When asked specifically what would prompt molecular testing, respondents most often listed adenocarcinoma, never-smoker status, female gender, and young age, Dr. Smeltzer said.
“Overall, we’re still finding that many in the lung cancer community are not satisfied with the current state of molecular testing. We’ve got suboptimal awareness of the evidence-based guidelines. We have barriers that remain to molecular testing, which we’ve identified, and [we’re] recommending continuous education around molecular testing, and that should be intensified on a national and international level to ensure that patients receive optimal therapy,” he concluded.
The IASLC survey was funded by AstraZeneca. Dr. Smeltzer reported receiving research support from the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation.
REPORTING FROM WCLC 2019
New IASLC declaration targets tobacco use among cancer patients
BARCELONA – All cancer patients should be screened for tobacco use and advised about the benefits of tobacco cessation, and evidence-based tobacco cessation assistance should be provided to those who continue using tobacco, according to a new declaration from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC).
Such assistance should be “routinely and integrally incorporated into multidisciplinary cancer care for the patients and their family members,” according to the declaration, which was developed by the IASLC Tobacco Control and Smoking Cessation Committee in part to increase physician involvement in tobacco control and was officially released at the World Conference on Lung Cancer.
“The consequences of smoking continuation by cancer patients and cancer survivors are many,” presenting author Jacek Jassem, MD, PhD, professor and head of the department of oncology and radiotherapy at the Medical University of Gdansk (Poland), said during a press conference at the meeting, which is sponsored by the IASLC.
Smoking after a cancer diagnosis increases cancer-related and overall mortality, the risk of developing additional cancers, and the risk of treatment toxicity, he explained.
“And of course [continued smoking is] associated with much higher treatment costs, mostly due to complications,” he added.
The IASLC addresses both the challenges and opportunities associated with tobacco cessation, including the fact that most cancer patients who smoke continue to do so during and after treatment and that health care providers often don’t provide patients with cessation assistance to help them quit.
In addition to the screening and tobacco cessation assistance recommendations, the declaration also states the following:
- Educational programs regarding cancer management should include tobacco cessation training, empathetic communication around the history of tobacco use and cessation, and utilization of existing evidence-based tobacco cessation resources.
- Smoking cessation counseling and treatment should be a reimbursable service.
- Smoking status, both initially and during the study, should be a required data element for all prospective clinical studies.
- Clinical trials of patients with cancer should consider designs that could also determine the most effective tobacco cessation interventions.
Dr. Jassem is on the speakers bureau for MSD, Takeda, BMS, Astra-Zeneca, and Pfizer.
BARCELONA – All cancer patients should be screened for tobacco use and advised about the benefits of tobacco cessation, and evidence-based tobacco cessation assistance should be provided to those who continue using tobacco, according to a new declaration from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC).
Such assistance should be “routinely and integrally incorporated into multidisciplinary cancer care for the patients and their family members,” according to the declaration, which was developed by the IASLC Tobacco Control and Smoking Cessation Committee in part to increase physician involvement in tobacco control and was officially released at the World Conference on Lung Cancer.
“The consequences of smoking continuation by cancer patients and cancer survivors are many,” presenting author Jacek Jassem, MD, PhD, professor and head of the department of oncology and radiotherapy at the Medical University of Gdansk (Poland), said during a press conference at the meeting, which is sponsored by the IASLC.
Smoking after a cancer diagnosis increases cancer-related and overall mortality, the risk of developing additional cancers, and the risk of treatment toxicity, he explained.
“And of course [continued smoking is] associated with much higher treatment costs, mostly due to complications,” he added.
The IASLC addresses both the challenges and opportunities associated with tobacco cessation, including the fact that most cancer patients who smoke continue to do so during and after treatment and that health care providers often don’t provide patients with cessation assistance to help them quit.
In addition to the screening and tobacco cessation assistance recommendations, the declaration also states the following:
- Educational programs regarding cancer management should include tobacco cessation training, empathetic communication around the history of tobacco use and cessation, and utilization of existing evidence-based tobacco cessation resources.
- Smoking cessation counseling and treatment should be a reimbursable service.
- Smoking status, both initially and during the study, should be a required data element for all prospective clinical studies.
- Clinical trials of patients with cancer should consider designs that could also determine the most effective tobacco cessation interventions.
Dr. Jassem is on the speakers bureau for MSD, Takeda, BMS, Astra-Zeneca, and Pfizer.
BARCELONA – All cancer patients should be screened for tobacco use and advised about the benefits of tobacco cessation, and evidence-based tobacco cessation assistance should be provided to those who continue using tobacco, according to a new declaration from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC).
Such assistance should be “routinely and integrally incorporated into multidisciplinary cancer care for the patients and their family members,” according to the declaration, which was developed by the IASLC Tobacco Control and Smoking Cessation Committee in part to increase physician involvement in tobacco control and was officially released at the World Conference on Lung Cancer.
“The consequences of smoking continuation by cancer patients and cancer survivors are many,” presenting author Jacek Jassem, MD, PhD, professor and head of the department of oncology and radiotherapy at the Medical University of Gdansk (Poland), said during a press conference at the meeting, which is sponsored by the IASLC.
Smoking after a cancer diagnosis increases cancer-related and overall mortality, the risk of developing additional cancers, and the risk of treatment toxicity, he explained.
“And of course [continued smoking is] associated with much higher treatment costs, mostly due to complications,” he added.
The IASLC addresses both the challenges and opportunities associated with tobacco cessation, including the fact that most cancer patients who smoke continue to do so during and after treatment and that health care providers often don’t provide patients with cessation assistance to help them quit.
In addition to the screening and tobacco cessation assistance recommendations, the declaration also states the following:
- Educational programs regarding cancer management should include tobacco cessation training, empathetic communication around the history of tobacco use and cessation, and utilization of existing evidence-based tobacco cessation resources.
- Smoking cessation counseling and treatment should be a reimbursable service.
- Smoking status, both initially and during the study, should be a required data element for all prospective clinical studies.
- Clinical trials of patients with cancer should consider designs that could also determine the most effective tobacco cessation interventions.
Dr. Jassem is on the speakers bureau for MSD, Takeda, BMS, Astra-Zeneca, and Pfizer.
REPORTING FROM WCLC 2019
New evidence supports immune system involvement in hidradenitis suppurativa
Immune dysregulation is a substantial feature of hidradenitis suppurativa in African American patients, according to data from 16 adults.
The etiology of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) remains unknown, but neutrophils are prominent in affected areas of skin, wrote Angel S. Byrd, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and colleagues.
“Among the several functions of neutrophils, these cells have the ability to form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) after exposure to certain microbes or sterile stimuli,” the researchers noted. These NETs are weblike structures that have been shown to activate several types of immune responses and promote inflammation.
In a study published in Science Translational Medicine, the researchers analyzed biospecimens from African American HS patients. They determined that NET structures were present in the lesional skin of HS patients, but not in control skin. Additionally, serum from HS patients did not properly degrade healthy control NETs in an in vitro examination.
A significant correlation (P less than .0001) occurred between the amount of NETs released in hidradenitis suppurativa lesions and hidradenitis suppurativa severity.
“Together, these results indicate that NET formation is enhanced in HS, both systemically and in lesional skin, in association with disease severity and that NET degradation mechanisms may be impaired in this disease,” the researchers wrote.
The researchers also found that total immunoglobulin G was significantly increased in the sera of HS patients, compared with that of healthy volunteers (P = .0011), and that enzymes involved in skin citrullination were elevated in the skin of HS patients, compared with controls’ skin.
Previous studies have shown that NETs can promote type I interferon (IFN) signatures in the blood of patients with autoimmune and chronic inflammatory conditions, and in this study, several type I IFN–regulated genes had increased expression in HS skin, including IFI44L, MX1, CXCL10, RSAD2, and IFI27.
The study findings were limited by the small sample size and homogenous population, the researchers noted. Future research should include “the role that neutrophil/type I IFN dysregulation plays in the clinical manifestations of the disease, and how these abnormalities in immune responses regulate other innate and adaptive immune cell types in HS,” which could affect the development of new treatments, they wrote.
The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Physician Scientist Training Program, and the Danby Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation. Dr. Byrd disclosed participating in the Johns Hopkins Ethnic Skin Fellowship, which was supported in part by Valeant. Dr. Byrd also disclosed serving as a former investigator for Eli Lilly.
SOURCE: Byrd AS et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Sep 4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav5908.
Immune dysregulation is a substantial feature of hidradenitis suppurativa in African American patients, according to data from 16 adults.
The etiology of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) remains unknown, but neutrophils are prominent in affected areas of skin, wrote Angel S. Byrd, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and colleagues.
“Among the several functions of neutrophils, these cells have the ability to form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) after exposure to certain microbes or sterile stimuli,” the researchers noted. These NETs are weblike structures that have been shown to activate several types of immune responses and promote inflammation.
In a study published in Science Translational Medicine, the researchers analyzed biospecimens from African American HS patients. They determined that NET structures were present in the lesional skin of HS patients, but not in control skin. Additionally, serum from HS patients did not properly degrade healthy control NETs in an in vitro examination.
A significant correlation (P less than .0001) occurred between the amount of NETs released in hidradenitis suppurativa lesions and hidradenitis suppurativa severity.
“Together, these results indicate that NET formation is enhanced in HS, both systemically and in lesional skin, in association with disease severity and that NET degradation mechanisms may be impaired in this disease,” the researchers wrote.
The researchers also found that total immunoglobulin G was significantly increased in the sera of HS patients, compared with that of healthy volunteers (P = .0011), and that enzymes involved in skin citrullination were elevated in the skin of HS patients, compared with controls’ skin.
Previous studies have shown that NETs can promote type I interferon (IFN) signatures in the blood of patients with autoimmune and chronic inflammatory conditions, and in this study, several type I IFN–regulated genes had increased expression in HS skin, including IFI44L, MX1, CXCL10, RSAD2, and IFI27.
The study findings were limited by the small sample size and homogenous population, the researchers noted. Future research should include “the role that neutrophil/type I IFN dysregulation plays in the clinical manifestations of the disease, and how these abnormalities in immune responses regulate other innate and adaptive immune cell types in HS,” which could affect the development of new treatments, they wrote.
The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Physician Scientist Training Program, and the Danby Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation. Dr. Byrd disclosed participating in the Johns Hopkins Ethnic Skin Fellowship, which was supported in part by Valeant. Dr. Byrd also disclosed serving as a former investigator for Eli Lilly.
SOURCE: Byrd AS et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Sep 4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav5908.
Immune dysregulation is a substantial feature of hidradenitis suppurativa in African American patients, according to data from 16 adults.
The etiology of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) remains unknown, but neutrophils are prominent in affected areas of skin, wrote Angel S. Byrd, MD, PhD, of Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, and colleagues.
“Among the several functions of neutrophils, these cells have the ability to form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) after exposure to certain microbes or sterile stimuli,” the researchers noted. These NETs are weblike structures that have been shown to activate several types of immune responses and promote inflammation.
In a study published in Science Translational Medicine, the researchers analyzed biospecimens from African American HS patients. They determined that NET structures were present in the lesional skin of HS patients, but not in control skin. Additionally, serum from HS patients did not properly degrade healthy control NETs in an in vitro examination.
A significant correlation (P less than .0001) occurred between the amount of NETs released in hidradenitis suppurativa lesions and hidradenitis suppurativa severity.
“Together, these results indicate that NET formation is enhanced in HS, both systemically and in lesional skin, in association with disease severity and that NET degradation mechanisms may be impaired in this disease,” the researchers wrote.
The researchers also found that total immunoglobulin G was significantly increased in the sera of HS patients, compared with that of healthy volunteers (P = .0011), and that enzymes involved in skin citrullination were elevated in the skin of HS patients, compared with controls’ skin.
Previous studies have shown that NETs can promote type I interferon (IFN) signatures in the blood of patients with autoimmune and chronic inflammatory conditions, and in this study, several type I IFN–regulated genes had increased expression in HS skin, including IFI44L, MX1, CXCL10, RSAD2, and IFI27.
The study findings were limited by the small sample size and homogenous population, the researchers noted. Future research should include “the role that neutrophil/type I IFN dysregulation plays in the clinical manifestations of the disease, and how these abnormalities in immune responses regulate other innate and adaptive immune cell types in HS,” which could affect the development of new treatments, they wrote.
The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Physician Scientist Training Program, and the Danby Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation. Dr. Byrd disclosed participating in the Johns Hopkins Ethnic Skin Fellowship, which was supported in part by Valeant. Dr. Byrd also disclosed serving as a former investigator for Eli Lilly.
SOURCE: Byrd AS et al. Sci Transl Med. 2019 Sep 4. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav5908.
FROM SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
SABR offers surgery alternative for localized RCC
For patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be an effective alternative to surgery, according to findings from a retrospective study.
Patients with smaller tumors and nonmetastatic disease achieved the best outcomes with SABR, reported lead author Rodney E. Wegner, MD, of Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, and colleagues.
“Radiation therapy is often overlooked in [RCC] as historic preclinical data reported RCC as being relatively radioresistant to external beam radiation at conventional doses,” the investigators wrote in Advances in Radiation Oncology. However, SABR may be able to overcome this resistance by delivering “highly conformal dose escalated radiation,” the investigators noted, citing two recent reports from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney (IROCK) that showed promising results (J Urol. 2019 Jun;201[6]:1097-104 and Cancer. 2018 Mar 1;124[5]:934-42).
The present study included 347 patients with RCC from the National Cancer Database who were treated with SABR and not surgery. Most patients (94%) did not have systemic therapy. Similar proportions lacked lymph node involvement (97%) or distant metastasis (93%). About three-quarters of patients (76%) had T1 disease. The median SABR dose was 45 Gy, ranging from 35 to 54 Gy, most frequently given in three fractions.
After a median follow-up of 36 months, ranging from 1 to 156 months, median overall survival across all patients was 58 months. SABR was most effective for patients with nonmetastatic disease who had smaller tumors.
An inverse correlation between tumor size and overall survival was apparent given that patients with tumors 2.5 cm or smaller had the longest median overall survival, at 92 months, with decrements in survival as tumors got larger. Survival dropped to 88 months for tumors 2.6-3.5 cm, 44 months for tumors 3.5-5.0 cm, and finally to 26 months for tumors larger than 5.0 cm. In addition to tumor size and metastatic disease, age was a risk factor for shorter survival.
“The results presented demonstrate excellent post-SABR outcomes, with median overall survival in the range of 7-8 years for smaller lesions,” the investigators wrote. “This is particularly impressive considering that many of these patients were likely medically inoperable.”
The researchers noted that most of kidney SABR is done at academic centers, which highlights the importance of appropriate technology and training for delivering this treatment.
“Further prospective research is needed to verify its safety and efficacy,” the investigators concluded.
No external funding was provided for the project and the investigators reported no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Wegner RE et al. Adv Rad Onc. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.07.018.
For patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be an effective alternative to surgery, according to findings from a retrospective study.
Patients with smaller tumors and nonmetastatic disease achieved the best outcomes with SABR, reported lead author Rodney E. Wegner, MD, of Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, and colleagues.
“Radiation therapy is often overlooked in [RCC] as historic preclinical data reported RCC as being relatively radioresistant to external beam radiation at conventional doses,” the investigators wrote in Advances in Radiation Oncology. However, SABR may be able to overcome this resistance by delivering “highly conformal dose escalated radiation,” the investigators noted, citing two recent reports from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney (IROCK) that showed promising results (J Urol. 2019 Jun;201[6]:1097-104 and Cancer. 2018 Mar 1;124[5]:934-42).
The present study included 347 patients with RCC from the National Cancer Database who were treated with SABR and not surgery. Most patients (94%) did not have systemic therapy. Similar proportions lacked lymph node involvement (97%) or distant metastasis (93%). About three-quarters of patients (76%) had T1 disease. The median SABR dose was 45 Gy, ranging from 35 to 54 Gy, most frequently given in three fractions.
After a median follow-up of 36 months, ranging from 1 to 156 months, median overall survival across all patients was 58 months. SABR was most effective for patients with nonmetastatic disease who had smaller tumors.
An inverse correlation between tumor size and overall survival was apparent given that patients with tumors 2.5 cm or smaller had the longest median overall survival, at 92 months, with decrements in survival as tumors got larger. Survival dropped to 88 months for tumors 2.6-3.5 cm, 44 months for tumors 3.5-5.0 cm, and finally to 26 months for tumors larger than 5.0 cm. In addition to tumor size and metastatic disease, age was a risk factor for shorter survival.
“The results presented demonstrate excellent post-SABR outcomes, with median overall survival in the range of 7-8 years for smaller lesions,” the investigators wrote. “This is particularly impressive considering that many of these patients were likely medically inoperable.”
The researchers noted that most of kidney SABR is done at academic centers, which highlights the importance of appropriate technology and training for delivering this treatment.
“Further prospective research is needed to verify its safety and efficacy,” the investigators concluded.
No external funding was provided for the project and the investigators reported no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Wegner RE et al. Adv Rad Onc. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.07.018.
For patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be an effective alternative to surgery, according to findings from a retrospective study.
Patients with smaller tumors and nonmetastatic disease achieved the best outcomes with SABR, reported lead author Rodney E. Wegner, MD, of Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, and colleagues.
“Radiation therapy is often overlooked in [RCC] as historic preclinical data reported RCC as being relatively radioresistant to external beam radiation at conventional doses,” the investigators wrote in Advances in Radiation Oncology. However, SABR may be able to overcome this resistance by delivering “highly conformal dose escalated radiation,” the investigators noted, citing two recent reports from the International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney (IROCK) that showed promising results (J Urol. 2019 Jun;201[6]:1097-104 and Cancer. 2018 Mar 1;124[5]:934-42).
The present study included 347 patients with RCC from the National Cancer Database who were treated with SABR and not surgery. Most patients (94%) did not have systemic therapy. Similar proportions lacked lymph node involvement (97%) or distant metastasis (93%). About three-quarters of patients (76%) had T1 disease. The median SABR dose was 45 Gy, ranging from 35 to 54 Gy, most frequently given in three fractions.
After a median follow-up of 36 months, ranging from 1 to 156 months, median overall survival across all patients was 58 months. SABR was most effective for patients with nonmetastatic disease who had smaller tumors.
An inverse correlation between tumor size and overall survival was apparent given that patients with tumors 2.5 cm or smaller had the longest median overall survival, at 92 months, with decrements in survival as tumors got larger. Survival dropped to 88 months for tumors 2.6-3.5 cm, 44 months for tumors 3.5-5.0 cm, and finally to 26 months for tumors larger than 5.0 cm. In addition to tumor size and metastatic disease, age was a risk factor for shorter survival.
“The results presented demonstrate excellent post-SABR outcomes, with median overall survival in the range of 7-8 years for smaller lesions,” the investigators wrote. “This is particularly impressive considering that many of these patients were likely medically inoperable.”
The researchers noted that most of kidney SABR is done at academic centers, which highlights the importance of appropriate technology and training for delivering this treatment.
“Further prospective research is needed to verify its safety and efficacy,” the investigators concluded.
No external funding was provided for the project and the investigators reported no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Wegner RE et al. Adv Rad Onc. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.07.018.
FROM ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Median overall survival was 92 months among patients with renal tumors no larger than 2.5 cm.
Study details: A retrospective study involving 347 patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who were treated with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy.
Disclosures: No external funding was provided for the study and the investigators reported having no conflicts of interest.
Source: Wegner RE et al. Adv Rad Onc. 2019 Aug 8. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.07.018.