User login
Bringing you the latest news, research and reviews, exclusive interviews, podcasts, quizzes, and more.
div[contains(@class, 'header__large-screen')]
div[contains(@class, 'read-next-article')]
div[contains(@class, 'nav-primary')]
nav[contains(@class, 'nav-primary')]
section[contains(@class, 'footer-nav-section-wrapper')]
footer[@id='footer']
div[contains(@class, 'main-prefix')]
section[contains(@class, 'nav-hidden')]
div[contains(@class, 'ce-card-content')]
nav[contains(@class, 'nav-ce-stack')]
What is the psychological impact of type 1 diabetes?
“Living with diabetes is not smooth sailing…From the onset of the disease in a child or adolescent through all the days that follow, there is nothing ordinary about it,” according to Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques (AJD), a French association providing support for children and adolescents with diabetes. What is the psychological impact of the disease on patients and their loved ones? When we look at the life of a person with diabetes, are there key stages that call for more focused attention?
Nadine Hoffmeister, a psychologist at AJD, offers support to patients with diabetes and their parents as they navigate and deal with in-patient treatment for the disease. She recently spoke with this news organization.
Q: Are psychological issues more prevalent in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) than in the general population?
Dr. Hoffmeister: Having a chronic disease is not something that should be viewed as automatically making the person more susceptible to psychological issues. When we think about kids with T1D, it’s important to keep in mind that the risk for depression and the risk for eating disorders are, in general, higher in adolescence.
Of course,
Q: Are there key stages in the life of patients with T1D that call for targeted psychological support?
Dr. Hoffmeister: The thing about T1D is that it can affect anyone at any age – a small child, a teenager, a young adult. So, in that sense, all ‘firsts’ are key stages. They start, of course, with the first ‘first’: diagnosis. For children diagnosed at an early age, there’s the first day of nursery school or kindergarten, the first piece of birthday cake. Then we get to kids starting middle school and high school, places where they’re now left to their own devices. This is when, for the first time, they’ll have an opportunity to take a trip without their parents and siblings, to go to a party.
And then, there’s the first time using a particular treatment. For example, switching from injections to a pump requires not only an adjustment in terms of physically operating a new device, but a reorientation in terms of mentally settling into a new routine, a new way of administering medication, and so on. They have to learn how to get along with this machine that’s attached to them all the time. They have to view it as being a part of them, view it as a partner, a teammate, a friend. It’s not that easy.
Later on, one of the major stages is, of course, adolescence. Critical developments in the separation–individuation process are taking place. They start to feel the need to break free, to become autonomous, as they seek to fully come to terms with their disease.
Parents usually worry about this stage, adolescence. They’re scared that their child won’t be as vigilant, that they’ll be scatterbrained or careless when it comes to staying on top of all those things that need to be done to keep T1D under control. Most of the time, this stage goes better than they thought. Still, the fact remains that it’s difficult to find a happy medium between adolescence and diabetes. Indeed, there’s a bit of a paradox here. On the one hand, we have adolescence which, by definition, is a time of spontaneity, independence, of trying new things. On the other hand, we have diabetes and its limits and constraints, its care and treatment, day in and day out. We have to pay close attention to how the child navigates and makes their way through this stage of their life.
During adolescence, there’s also a heightened awareness and concern about how others look at you, see you – everywhere, not only in classrooms and hallways. If the way someone looks at them seems aggressive or intrusive, the child may start to feel scared. The risk then becomes that they’ll start feeling awkward or ashamed or embarrassed. We have to keep this in mind and help lead the child away from those feelings. Otherwise, they can end up with low self-esteem, they can start to withdraw.
It can sometimes get to the point where they choose to neglect their treatment so as to conform to the way others see them. Adults can easily lose sight of these kinds of things. So, it’s imperative that we talk to the child. If they’re having trouble following their treatment plan, maybe there’s something going on at school. So, let’s ask them: “How do you like your classes and teachers?” “How are you doing with your injections? Are you finding that they’re getting easier and easier to do?” And always keeping in mind the real possibility that the child may be feeling awkward, ashamed, embarrassed.
Q: Is enough being done to pick up on and address these children’s needs?
Dr. Hoffmeister: I think that these efforts are becoming more and more widespread. Still, there are disparities. When it comes to patients with chronic diseases, it’s not always easy to implement mental health care into the treatment plan. In some cases, there might not be a hospital nearby. And as we know, there are no spots available in medical and psychiatric centers. Of course, outside of hospital settings, we’re seeing the unfortunate situation of fewer and fewer middle schools and high schools having nurses on site.
And then, what options there are for getting support vary greatly from hospital to hospital. Some don’t have psychologists. Others have full schedules and not enough staff. That said, more and more teams are trying to set up regular appointments right from the time of diagnosis. This is a really good approach to take, even though the circumstances may not be ideal. After all, the person has just been told that they have diabetes; they’re not really in the best state of mind to have any kind of discussion.
Q: And so, it makes sense that AJD would offer the kind of mental health support that you’re now providing there.
Dr. Hoffmeister: Exactly. My position was created 4 years ago. I’m not at the hospital. I’m an external. The goal is to be able to offer this psychological support to everyone. I do consultations over the phone so that no matter where a person is in France, they’ll have access to this support. There’s great demand, and the requests are only increasing. I think this has to do with the fact that people are being diagnosed younger and younger. It’s a very complicated situation for the parents. No matter how young their child is, they want to get that support underway as soon as possible.
Q: You speak about the patients getting support. But doesn’t some kind of help have to be given to their parents and loved ones as well?
Dr. Hoffmeister: Yes. I’d say that 60% to 70% of the work I do at AJD is for parents. I also have some older adolescents and some younger kids whom I call to keep up with. But children aren’t very interested in discussing plans over the phone. For parents, the thing about diabetes is that they find themselves in these situations where their child is in the hospital for, say, a week, then is discharged, and all of a sudden, they find themselves at home as the ones in charge of their child’s treatment.
When it’s a little kid, the parents are the ones who are taking care of all the steps, the injections, the pumps. They’re dealing with the distress of a child going through episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia. They’re experiencing varying degrees of anxiety in carrying out all of these responsibilities and, at the same time, the bond they have with their child is becoming stronger and stronger. So, there’s that anxiety. In this situation, parents may also feel a need for control. And they’re also feeling exhausted; the mental load of dealing with diabetes is very, very intense. To work through all this, many parents reach out for psychological support.
Then later on, when the child has gotten a little older, the parents find it difficult to get to the point of being able to just let go. But once the parents get to know their child better, get to know how their child experiences diabetes, they’ll get to that point. What they come to learn is that the child can take care of things, the child can feel what’s going on in their body, the child can be trusted.
Q: How can we help and support children with diabetes?
Dr. Hoffmeister: One of the most important things is to teach the child to come to terms with the disease and how it affects their body. In other words, the idea here is to adapt diabetes to one’s life, not the other way around. The goal is to not let diabetes take over.
When faced with standardized medical protocols, during a session with a psychologist, the child can talk about their life, give an idea of what a day in their life looks like. For example, the school cafeteria is a place where children get the opportunity to socialize and interact with their peers. We want to have that lunch period be as normal as possible for the child with diabetes. In some schools, lunchtime becomes a challenge. So, not seeing any other solution, mom stops working so the child can come home to eat. These are the kinds of situations where efforts to make the child feel included have failed. They’re tough to deal with, all around. And so this is why we do all we can to keep things as normal as possible for these children.
Q: What would you say is the one initiative out there that’s giving young patients with T1D the most help and support?
Dr. Hoffmeister: AJD offers stays at Care Management and Rehabilitation (SSR) sites. For kids and teenagers with diabetes, these places are like summer camps where every aspect of treatment is taken care of.
There’s a medical team monitoring their disease and a team of counselors always on hand. It’s a time when children may very well bring up things that are on their mind. All in all, the children have a safe and welcoming environment where treatment is provided and they can feel free to open up and talk.
If a problem crops up, I’m always on call to jump online. And throughout the stay, the medical team is keeping in touch to discuss the child’s care.
AJD is also an interdisciplinary association. We regularly organize practice exchange groups that bring together health care professionals and families from all over France. In this way, we’re able to collaborate and come up with resources, such as information packets and kits – for the newly diagnosed, for those starting intensive insulin therapy, and so on. These resources take into account medical protocols related to diabetes. They’re also designed with family life in mind. And having this set of resources works toward standardizing treatments.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
“Living with diabetes is not smooth sailing…From the onset of the disease in a child or adolescent through all the days that follow, there is nothing ordinary about it,” according to Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques (AJD), a French association providing support for children and adolescents with diabetes. What is the psychological impact of the disease on patients and their loved ones? When we look at the life of a person with diabetes, are there key stages that call for more focused attention?
Nadine Hoffmeister, a psychologist at AJD, offers support to patients with diabetes and their parents as they navigate and deal with in-patient treatment for the disease. She recently spoke with this news organization.
Q: Are psychological issues more prevalent in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) than in the general population?
Dr. Hoffmeister: Having a chronic disease is not something that should be viewed as automatically making the person more susceptible to psychological issues. When we think about kids with T1D, it’s important to keep in mind that the risk for depression and the risk for eating disorders are, in general, higher in adolescence.
Of course,
Q: Are there key stages in the life of patients with T1D that call for targeted psychological support?
Dr. Hoffmeister: The thing about T1D is that it can affect anyone at any age – a small child, a teenager, a young adult. So, in that sense, all ‘firsts’ are key stages. They start, of course, with the first ‘first’: diagnosis. For children diagnosed at an early age, there’s the first day of nursery school or kindergarten, the first piece of birthday cake. Then we get to kids starting middle school and high school, places where they’re now left to their own devices. This is when, for the first time, they’ll have an opportunity to take a trip without their parents and siblings, to go to a party.
And then, there’s the first time using a particular treatment. For example, switching from injections to a pump requires not only an adjustment in terms of physically operating a new device, but a reorientation in terms of mentally settling into a new routine, a new way of administering medication, and so on. They have to learn how to get along with this machine that’s attached to them all the time. They have to view it as being a part of them, view it as a partner, a teammate, a friend. It’s not that easy.
Later on, one of the major stages is, of course, adolescence. Critical developments in the separation–individuation process are taking place. They start to feel the need to break free, to become autonomous, as they seek to fully come to terms with their disease.
Parents usually worry about this stage, adolescence. They’re scared that their child won’t be as vigilant, that they’ll be scatterbrained or careless when it comes to staying on top of all those things that need to be done to keep T1D under control. Most of the time, this stage goes better than they thought. Still, the fact remains that it’s difficult to find a happy medium between adolescence and diabetes. Indeed, there’s a bit of a paradox here. On the one hand, we have adolescence which, by definition, is a time of spontaneity, independence, of trying new things. On the other hand, we have diabetes and its limits and constraints, its care and treatment, day in and day out. We have to pay close attention to how the child navigates and makes their way through this stage of their life.
During adolescence, there’s also a heightened awareness and concern about how others look at you, see you – everywhere, not only in classrooms and hallways. If the way someone looks at them seems aggressive or intrusive, the child may start to feel scared. The risk then becomes that they’ll start feeling awkward or ashamed or embarrassed. We have to keep this in mind and help lead the child away from those feelings. Otherwise, they can end up with low self-esteem, they can start to withdraw.
It can sometimes get to the point where they choose to neglect their treatment so as to conform to the way others see them. Adults can easily lose sight of these kinds of things. So, it’s imperative that we talk to the child. If they’re having trouble following their treatment plan, maybe there’s something going on at school. So, let’s ask them: “How do you like your classes and teachers?” “How are you doing with your injections? Are you finding that they’re getting easier and easier to do?” And always keeping in mind the real possibility that the child may be feeling awkward, ashamed, embarrassed.
Q: Is enough being done to pick up on and address these children’s needs?
Dr. Hoffmeister: I think that these efforts are becoming more and more widespread. Still, there are disparities. When it comes to patients with chronic diseases, it’s not always easy to implement mental health care into the treatment plan. In some cases, there might not be a hospital nearby. And as we know, there are no spots available in medical and psychiatric centers. Of course, outside of hospital settings, we’re seeing the unfortunate situation of fewer and fewer middle schools and high schools having nurses on site.
And then, what options there are for getting support vary greatly from hospital to hospital. Some don’t have psychologists. Others have full schedules and not enough staff. That said, more and more teams are trying to set up regular appointments right from the time of diagnosis. This is a really good approach to take, even though the circumstances may not be ideal. After all, the person has just been told that they have diabetes; they’re not really in the best state of mind to have any kind of discussion.
Q: And so, it makes sense that AJD would offer the kind of mental health support that you’re now providing there.
Dr. Hoffmeister: Exactly. My position was created 4 years ago. I’m not at the hospital. I’m an external. The goal is to be able to offer this psychological support to everyone. I do consultations over the phone so that no matter where a person is in France, they’ll have access to this support. There’s great demand, and the requests are only increasing. I think this has to do with the fact that people are being diagnosed younger and younger. It’s a very complicated situation for the parents. No matter how young their child is, they want to get that support underway as soon as possible.
Q: You speak about the patients getting support. But doesn’t some kind of help have to be given to their parents and loved ones as well?
Dr. Hoffmeister: Yes. I’d say that 60% to 70% of the work I do at AJD is for parents. I also have some older adolescents and some younger kids whom I call to keep up with. But children aren’t very interested in discussing plans over the phone. For parents, the thing about diabetes is that they find themselves in these situations where their child is in the hospital for, say, a week, then is discharged, and all of a sudden, they find themselves at home as the ones in charge of their child’s treatment.
When it’s a little kid, the parents are the ones who are taking care of all the steps, the injections, the pumps. They’re dealing with the distress of a child going through episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia. They’re experiencing varying degrees of anxiety in carrying out all of these responsibilities and, at the same time, the bond they have with their child is becoming stronger and stronger. So, there’s that anxiety. In this situation, parents may also feel a need for control. And they’re also feeling exhausted; the mental load of dealing with diabetes is very, very intense. To work through all this, many parents reach out for psychological support.
Then later on, when the child has gotten a little older, the parents find it difficult to get to the point of being able to just let go. But once the parents get to know their child better, get to know how their child experiences diabetes, they’ll get to that point. What they come to learn is that the child can take care of things, the child can feel what’s going on in their body, the child can be trusted.
Q: How can we help and support children with diabetes?
Dr. Hoffmeister: One of the most important things is to teach the child to come to terms with the disease and how it affects their body. In other words, the idea here is to adapt diabetes to one’s life, not the other way around. The goal is to not let diabetes take over.
When faced with standardized medical protocols, during a session with a psychologist, the child can talk about their life, give an idea of what a day in their life looks like. For example, the school cafeteria is a place where children get the opportunity to socialize and interact with their peers. We want to have that lunch period be as normal as possible for the child with diabetes. In some schools, lunchtime becomes a challenge. So, not seeing any other solution, mom stops working so the child can come home to eat. These are the kinds of situations where efforts to make the child feel included have failed. They’re tough to deal with, all around. And so this is why we do all we can to keep things as normal as possible for these children.
Q: What would you say is the one initiative out there that’s giving young patients with T1D the most help and support?
Dr. Hoffmeister: AJD offers stays at Care Management and Rehabilitation (SSR) sites. For kids and teenagers with diabetes, these places are like summer camps where every aspect of treatment is taken care of.
There’s a medical team monitoring their disease and a team of counselors always on hand. It’s a time when children may very well bring up things that are on their mind. All in all, the children have a safe and welcoming environment where treatment is provided and they can feel free to open up and talk.
If a problem crops up, I’m always on call to jump online. And throughout the stay, the medical team is keeping in touch to discuss the child’s care.
AJD is also an interdisciplinary association. We regularly organize practice exchange groups that bring together health care professionals and families from all over France. In this way, we’re able to collaborate and come up with resources, such as information packets and kits – for the newly diagnosed, for those starting intensive insulin therapy, and so on. These resources take into account medical protocols related to diabetes. They’re also designed with family life in mind. And having this set of resources works toward standardizing treatments.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
“Living with diabetes is not smooth sailing…From the onset of the disease in a child or adolescent through all the days that follow, there is nothing ordinary about it,” according to Aide aux Jeunes Diabétiques (AJD), a French association providing support for children and adolescents with diabetes. What is the psychological impact of the disease on patients and their loved ones? When we look at the life of a person with diabetes, are there key stages that call for more focused attention?
Nadine Hoffmeister, a psychologist at AJD, offers support to patients with diabetes and their parents as they navigate and deal with in-patient treatment for the disease. She recently spoke with this news organization.
Q: Are psychological issues more prevalent in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) than in the general population?
Dr. Hoffmeister: Having a chronic disease is not something that should be viewed as automatically making the person more susceptible to psychological issues. When we think about kids with T1D, it’s important to keep in mind that the risk for depression and the risk for eating disorders are, in general, higher in adolescence.
Of course,
Q: Are there key stages in the life of patients with T1D that call for targeted psychological support?
Dr. Hoffmeister: The thing about T1D is that it can affect anyone at any age – a small child, a teenager, a young adult. So, in that sense, all ‘firsts’ are key stages. They start, of course, with the first ‘first’: diagnosis. For children diagnosed at an early age, there’s the first day of nursery school or kindergarten, the first piece of birthday cake. Then we get to kids starting middle school and high school, places where they’re now left to their own devices. This is when, for the first time, they’ll have an opportunity to take a trip without their parents and siblings, to go to a party.
And then, there’s the first time using a particular treatment. For example, switching from injections to a pump requires not only an adjustment in terms of physically operating a new device, but a reorientation in terms of mentally settling into a new routine, a new way of administering medication, and so on. They have to learn how to get along with this machine that’s attached to them all the time. They have to view it as being a part of them, view it as a partner, a teammate, a friend. It’s not that easy.
Later on, one of the major stages is, of course, adolescence. Critical developments in the separation–individuation process are taking place. They start to feel the need to break free, to become autonomous, as they seek to fully come to terms with their disease.
Parents usually worry about this stage, adolescence. They’re scared that their child won’t be as vigilant, that they’ll be scatterbrained or careless when it comes to staying on top of all those things that need to be done to keep T1D under control. Most of the time, this stage goes better than they thought. Still, the fact remains that it’s difficult to find a happy medium between adolescence and diabetes. Indeed, there’s a bit of a paradox here. On the one hand, we have adolescence which, by definition, is a time of spontaneity, independence, of trying new things. On the other hand, we have diabetes and its limits and constraints, its care and treatment, day in and day out. We have to pay close attention to how the child navigates and makes their way through this stage of their life.
During adolescence, there’s also a heightened awareness and concern about how others look at you, see you – everywhere, not only in classrooms and hallways. If the way someone looks at them seems aggressive or intrusive, the child may start to feel scared. The risk then becomes that they’ll start feeling awkward or ashamed or embarrassed. We have to keep this in mind and help lead the child away from those feelings. Otherwise, they can end up with low self-esteem, they can start to withdraw.
It can sometimes get to the point where they choose to neglect their treatment so as to conform to the way others see them. Adults can easily lose sight of these kinds of things. So, it’s imperative that we talk to the child. If they’re having trouble following their treatment plan, maybe there’s something going on at school. So, let’s ask them: “How do you like your classes and teachers?” “How are you doing with your injections? Are you finding that they’re getting easier and easier to do?” And always keeping in mind the real possibility that the child may be feeling awkward, ashamed, embarrassed.
Q: Is enough being done to pick up on and address these children’s needs?
Dr. Hoffmeister: I think that these efforts are becoming more and more widespread. Still, there are disparities. When it comes to patients with chronic diseases, it’s not always easy to implement mental health care into the treatment plan. In some cases, there might not be a hospital nearby. And as we know, there are no spots available in medical and psychiatric centers. Of course, outside of hospital settings, we’re seeing the unfortunate situation of fewer and fewer middle schools and high schools having nurses on site.
And then, what options there are for getting support vary greatly from hospital to hospital. Some don’t have psychologists. Others have full schedules and not enough staff. That said, more and more teams are trying to set up regular appointments right from the time of diagnosis. This is a really good approach to take, even though the circumstances may not be ideal. After all, the person has just been told that they have diabetes; they’re not really in the best state of mind to have any kind of discussion.
Q: And so, it makes sense that AJD would offer the kind of mental health support that you’re now providing there.
Dr. Hoffmeister: Exactly. My position was created 4 years ago. I’m not at the hospital. I’m an external. The goal is to be able to offer this psychological support to everyone. I do consultations over the phone so that no matter where a person is in France, they’ll have access to this support. There’s great demand, and the requests are only increasing. I think this has to do with the fact that people are being diagnosed younger and younger. It’s a very complicated situation for the parents. No matter how young their child is, they want to get that support underway as soon as possible.
Q: You speak about the patients getting support. But doesn’t some kind of help have to be given to their parents and loved ones as well?
Dr. Hoffmeister: Yes. I’d say that 60% to 70% of the work I do at AJD is for parents. I also have some older adolescents and some younger kids whom I call to keep up with. But children aren’t very interested in discussing plans over the phone. For parents, the thing about diabetes is that they find themselves in these situations where their child is in the hospital for, say, a week, then is discharged, and all of a sudden, they find themselves at home as the ones in charge of their child’s treatment.
When it’s a little kid, the parents are the ones who are taking care of all the steps, the injections, the pumps. They’re dealing with the distress of a child going through episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia. They’re experiencing varying degrees of anxiety in carrying out all of these responsibilities and, at the same time, the bond they have with their child is becoming stronger and stronger. So, there’s that anxiety. In this situation, parents may also feel a need for control. And they’re also feeling exhausted; the mental load of dealing with diabetes is very, very intense. To work through all this, many parents reach out for psychological support.
Then later on, when the child has gotten a little older, the parents find it difficult to get to the point of being able to just let go. But once the parents get to know their child better, get to know how their child experiences diabetes, they’ll get to that point. What they come to learn is that the child can take care of things, the child can feel what’s going on in their body, the child can be trusted.
Q: How can we help and support children with diabetes?
Dr. Hoffmeister: One of the most important things is to teach the child to come to terms with the disease and how it affects their body. In other words, the idea here is to adapt diabetes to one’s life, not the other way around. The goal is to not let diabetes take over.
When faced with standardized medical protocols, during a session with a psychologist, the child can talk about their life, give an idea of what a day in their life looks like. For example, the school cafeteria is a place where children get the opportunity to socialize and interact with their peers. We want to have that lunch period be as normal as possible for the child with diabetes. In some schools, lunchtime becomes a challenge. So, not seeing any other solution, mom stops working so the child can come home to eat. These are the kinds of situations where efforts to make the child feel included have failed. They’re tough to deal with, all around. And so this is why we do all we can to keep things as normal as possible for these children.
Q: What would you say is the one initiative out there that’s giving young patients with T1D the most help and support?
Dr. Hoffmeister: AJD offers stays at Care Management and Rehabilitation (SSR) sites. For kids and teenagers with diabetes, these places are like summer camps where every aspect of treatment is taken care of.
There’s a medical team monitoring their disease and a team of counselors always on hand. It’s a time when children may very well bring up things that are on their mind. All in all, the children have a safe and welcoming environment where treatment is provided and they can feel free to open up and talk.
If a problem crops up, I’m always on call to jump online. And throughout the stay, the medical team is keeping in touch to discuss the child’s care.
AJD is also an interdisciplinary association. We regularly organize practice exchange groups that bring together health care professionals and families from all over France. In this way, we’re able to collaborate and come up with resources, such as information packets and kits – for the newly diagnosed, for those starting intensive insulin therapy, and so on. These resources take into account medical protocols related to diabetes. They’re also designed with family life in mind. And having this set of resources works toward standardizing treatments.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Mechanical ventilation in children tied to slightly lower IQ
Children who survive an episode of acute respiratory failure that requires invasive mechanical ventilation may be at risk for slightly lower long-term neurocognitive function, new research suggests.
Investigators found lower IQs in children without previous neurocognitive problems who survived pediatric intensive care unit admission for acute respiratory failure, compared with their biological siblings.
Although this magnitude of difference was small on average, more than twice as many patients as siblings had an IQ of ≤85, and children hospitalized at the youngest ages did worse than their siblings.
“Children surviving acute respiratory failure may benefit from routine evaluation of neurocognitive function after hospital discharge and may require serial evaluation to identify deficits that emerge over the course of child’s continued development to facilitate early intervention to prevent disability and optimize school performance,” study investigator R. Scott Watson, MD, MPH, professor of pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, told this news organization.
The study was published online March 1 in JAMA.
Unknown long-term effects
“Approximately 23,700 U.S. children undergo invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure annually, with unknown long-term effects on neurocognitive function,” the authors write.
“With improvements in pediatric critical care over the past several decades, critical illness–associated mortality has improved dramatically [but] as survivorship has increased, we are starting to learn that many patients and their families suffer from long-term morbidity associated with the illness and its treatment,” said Dr. Watson, who is the associate division chief, pediatric critical care medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development.
Animal studies “have found that some sedative medications commonly used to keep children safe during mechanical ventilation may have detrimental neurologic effects, particularly in the developing brain,” Dr. Watson added.
To gain a better understanding of this potential association, the researchers turned to a subset of participants in the previously conducted Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) trial of pediatric patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure.
For the current study (RESTORE-Cognition), multiple domains of neurocognitive function were assessed 3-8 years after hospital discharge in trial patients who did not have a history of neurocognitive dysfunction, as well as matched, healthy siblings.
To be included in the study, the children had to be ≤8 years old at trial enrollment, have a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) score of 1 (normal) prior to PICU admission, and have no worse than moderate neurocognitive dysfunction at PICU discharge.
Siblings of enrolled patients were required to be between 4 and 16 years old at the time of neurocognitive testing, have a PCPC score of 1, have the same biological parents as the patient, and live with the patient.
The primary outcome was IQ, estimated by the age-appropriate Vocabulary and Block Design subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. Secondary outcomes included attention, processing speed, learning and memory, visuospatial skills, motor skills, language, and executive function. Enough time was allowed after hospitalization “for transient deficits to resolve and longer-lasting neurocognitive sequelae to manifest.”
‘Uncertain’ clinical importance
Of the 121 sibling pairs (67% non-Hispanic White, 47% from families in which one or both parents worked full-time), 116 were included in the primary outcome analysis, and 66-19 were included in analyses of secondary outcomes.
Patients had been in the PICU at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 1.0 (0.2-3.2) years and had received a median of 5.5 (3.1-7.7) days of invasive mechanical ventilation.
The median age at testing for patients and matched siblings was 6.6 (5.4-9.1) and 8.4 (7.0-10.2) years, respectively. Interviews with parents and testing of patients were conducted a median (IQR) of 3.8 (3.2-5.2) and 5.2 (4.3-6.1) years, respectively, after hospitalization.
The most common etiologies of respiratory failure were bronchiolitis and asthma and pneumonia (44% and 37%, respectively). Beyond respiratory failure, most patients (72%) also had experienced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.
Patients had a lower mean estimated IQ, compared with the matched siblings (101.5 vs. 104.3; mean difference, –2.8 [95% confidence interval, –5.4 to –0.2]), and more patients than siblings had an estimated IQ of ≤5 but not of ≤70.
Patients also had significantly lower scores on nonverbal memory, visuospatial skills, and fine motor control (mean differences, –0.9 [–1.6 to –0.3]; –0.9 [–1.8 to –.1]; and –-3.1 [–4.9 to –1.4], respectively), compared with matched siblings. They also had significantly higher scores on processing speed (mean difference, 4.4 [0.2-8.5]). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes.
Differences in scores between patients and siblings varied significantly by age at hospitalization in several tests – for example, Block Design scores in patients were lower than those of siblings for patients hospitalized at <1 year old, versus those hospitalized between ages 4 and 8 years.
“When adjusting for patient age at PICU admission, patient age at testing, sibling age at testing, and duration between hospital discharge and testing, the difference in estimated IQ between patients and siblings remained statistically significantly different,” the authors note.
The investigators point out several limitations, including the fact that “little is known about sibling outcomes after critical illness, nor about whether parenting of siblings or child development differs based on birth order or on relationship between patient critical illness and the birth of siblings. ... If siblings also incur negative effects related to the critical illness, differences between critically ill children and the control siblings would be blunted.”
Despite the statistical significance of the difference between the patients and the matched controls, ultimately, the magnitude of the difference was “small and of uncertain clinical importance,” the authors conclude.
Filling a research gap
Commenting on the findings, Alexandre T. Rotta, MD, professor of pediatrics and chief of the division of pediatric critical care medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., said the study “addresses an important yet vastly understudied gap: long-term neurocognitive morbidity in children exposed to critical care.”
Dr. Rotta, who is also a coauthor of an accompanying editorial, noted that the fact that the “vast majority of children with an IQ significantly lower than their siblings were under the age of 4 years suggests that the developing immature brain may be particularly susceptible to the effects of critical illness and therapies required to treat it.”
The study “underscores the need to include assessments of long-term morbidity as part of any future trial evaluating interventions in pediatric critical care,” he added.
The study was supported by grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for RESTORE-Cognition and by grants for the RESTORE trial from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health. Dr. Watson and coauthors report no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Rotta has received personal fees from Vapotherm for lecturing and development of educational materials and from Breas US for participation in a scientific advisory board, as well as royalties from Elsevier for editorial work outside the submitted work. His coauthor reports no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Children who survive an episode of acute respiratory failure that requires invasive mechanical ventilation may be at risk for slightly lower long-term neurocognitive function, new research suggests.
Investigators found lower IQs in children without previous neurocognitive problems who survived pediatric intensive care unit admission for acute respiratory failure, compared with their biological siblings.
Although this magnitude of difference was small on average, more than twice as many patients as siblings had an IQ of ≤85, and children hospitalized at the youngest ages did worse than their siblings.
“Children surviving acute respiratory failure may benefit from routine evaluation of neurocognitive function after hospital discharge and may require serial evaluation to identify deficits that emerge over the course of child’s continued development to facilitate early intervention to prevent disability and optimize school performance,” study investigator R. Scott Watson, MD, MPH, professor of pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, told this news organization.
The study was published online March 1 in JAMA.
Unknown long-term effects
“Approximately 23,700 U.S. children undergo invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure annually, with unknown long-term effects on neurocognitive function,” the authors write.
“With improvements in pediatric critical care over the past several decades, critical illness–associated mortality has improved dramatically [but] as survivorship has increased, we are starting to learn that many patients and their families suffer from long-term morbidity associated with the illness and its treatment,” said Dr. Watson, who is the associate division chief, pediatric critical care medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development.
Animal studies “have found that some sedative medications commonly used to keep children safe during mechanical ventilation may have detrimental neurologic effects, particularly in the developing brain,” Dr. Watson added.
To gain a better understanding of this potential association, the researchers turned to a subset of participants in the previously conducted Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) trial of pediatric patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure.
For the current study (RESTORE-Cognition), multiple domains of neurocognitive function were assessed 3-8 years after hospital discharge in trial patients who did not have a history of neurocognitive dysfunction, as well as matched, healthy siblings.
To be included in the study, the children had to be ≤8 years old at trial enrollment, have a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) score of 1 (normal) prior to PICU admission, and have no worse than moderate neurocognitive dysfunction at PICU discharge.
Siblings of enrolled patients were required to be between 4 and 16 years old at the time of neurocognitive testing, have a PCPC score of 1, have the same biological parents as the patient, and live with the patient.
The primary outcome was IQ, estimated by the age-appropriate Vocabulary and Block Design subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. Secondary outcomes included attention, processing speed, learning and memory, visuospatial skills, motor skills, language, and executive function. Enough time was allowed after hospitalization “for transient deficits to resolve and longer-lasting neurocognitive sequelae to manifest.”
‘Uncertain’ clinical importance
Of the 121 sibling pairs (67% non-Hispanic White, 47% from families in which one or both parents worked full-time), 116 were included in the primary outcome analysis, and 66-19 were included in analyses of secondary outcomes.
Patients had been in the PICU at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 1.0 (0.2-3.2) years and had received a median of 5.5 (3.1-7.7) days of invasive mechanical ventilation.
The median age at testing for patients and matched siblings was 6.6 (5.4-9.1) and 8.4 (7.0-10.2) years, respectively. Interviews with parents and testing of patients were conducted a median (IQR) of 3.8 (3.2-5.2) and 5.2 (4.3-6.1) years, respectively, after hospitalization.
The most common etiologies of respiratory failure were bronchiolitis and asthma and pneumonia (44% and 37%, respectively). Beyond respiratory failure, most patients (72%) also had experienced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.
Patients had a lower mean estimated IQ, compared with the matched siblings (101.5 vs. 104.3; mean difference, –2.8 [95% confidence interval, –5.4 to –0.2]), and more patients than siblings had an estimated IQ of ≤5 but not of ≤70.
Patients also had significantly lower scores on nonverbal memory, visuospatial skills, and fine motor control (mean differences, –0.9 [–1.6 to –0.3]; –0.9 [–1.8 to –.1]; and –-3.1 [–4.9 to –1.4], respectively), compared with matched siblings. They also had significantly higher scores on processing speed (mean difference, 4.4 [0.2-8.5]). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes.
Differences in scores between patients and siblings varied significantly by age at hospitalization in several tests – for example, Block Design scores in patients were lower than those of siblings for patients hospitalized at <1 year old, versus those hospitalized between ages 4 and 8 years.
“When adjusting for patient age at PICU admission, patient age at testing, sibling age at testing, and duration between hospital discharge and testing, the difference in estimated IQ between patients and siblings remained statistically significantly different,” the authors note.
The investigators point out several limitations, including the fact that “little is known about sibling outcomes after critical illness, nor about whether parenting of siblings or child development differs based on birth order or on relationship between patient critical illness and the birth of siblings. ... If siblings also incur negative effects related to the critical illness, differences between critically ill children and the control siblings would be blunted.”
Despite the statistical significance of the difference between the patients and the matched controls, ultimately, the magnitude of the difference was “small and of uncertain clinical importance,” the authors conclude.
Filling a research gap
Commenting on the findings, Alexandre T. Rotta, MD, professor of pediatrics and chief of the division of pediatric critical care medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., said the study “addresses an important yet vastly understudied gap: long-term neurocognitive morbidity in children exposed to critical care.”
Dr. Rotta, who is also a coauthor of an accompanying editorial, noted that the fact that the “vast majority of children with an IQ significantly lower than their siblings were under the age of 4 years suggests that the developing immature brain may be particularly susceptible to the effects of critical illness and therapies required to treat it.”
The study “underscores the need to include assessments of long-term morbidity as part of any future trial evaluating interventions in pediatric critical care,” he added.
The study was supported by grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for RESTORE-Cognition and by grants for the RESTORE trial from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health. Dr. Watson and coauthors report no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Rotta has received personal fees from Vapotherm for lecturing and development of educational materials and from Breas US for participation in a scientific advisory board, as well as royalties from Elsevier for editorial work outside the submitted work. His coauthor reports no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Children who survive an episode of acute respiratory failure that requires invasive mechanical ventilation may be at risk for slightly lower long-term neurocognitive function, new research suggests.
Investigators found lower IQs in children without previous neurocognitive problems who survived pediatric intensive care unit admission for acute respiratory failure, compared with their biological siblings.
Although this magnitude of difference was small on average, more than twice as many patients as siblings had an IQ of ≤85, and children hospitalized at the youngest ages did worse than their siblings.
“Children surviving acute respiratory failure may benefit from routine evaluation of neurocognitive function after hospital discharge and may require serial evaluation to identify deficits that emerge over the course of child’s continued development to facilitate early intervention to prevent disability and optimize school performance,” study investigator R. Scott Watson, MD, MPH, professor of pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, told this news organization.
The study was published online March 1 in JAMA.
Unknown long-term effects
“Approximately 23,700 U.S. children undergo invasive mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure annually, with unknown long-term effects on neurocognitive function,” the authors write.
“With improvements in pediatric critical care over the past several decades, critical illness–associated mortality has improved dramatically [but] as survivorship has increased, we are starting to learn that many patients and their families suffer from long-term morbidity associated with the illness and its treatment,” said Dr. Watson, who is the associate division chief, pediatric critical care medicine, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development.
Animal studies “have found that some sedative medications commonly used to keep children safe during mechanical ventilation may have detrimental neurologic effects, particularly in the developing brain,” Dr. Watson added.
To gain a better understanding of this potential association, the researchers turned to a subset of participants in the previously conducted Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) trial of pediatric patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure.
For the current study (RESTORE-Cognition), multiple domains of neurocognitive function were assessed 3-8 years after hospital discharge in trial patients who did not have a history of neurocognitive dysfunction, as well as matched, healthy siblings.
To be included in the study, the children had to be ≤8 years old at trial enrollment, have a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) score of 1 (normal) prior to PICU admission, and have no worse than moderate neurocognitive dysfunction at PICU discharge.
Siblings of enrolled patients were required to be between 4 and 16 years old at the time of neurocognitive testing, have a PCPC score of 1, have the same biological parents as the patient, and live with the patient.
The primary outcome was IQ, estimated by the age-appropriate Vocabulary and Block Design subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale. Secondary outcomes included attention, processing speed, learning and memory, visuospatial skills, motor skills, language, and executive function. Enough time was allowed after hospitalization “for transient deficits to resolve and longer-lasting neurocognitive sequelae to manifest.”
‘Uncertain’ clinical importance
Of the 121 sibling pairs (67% non-Hispanic White, 47% from families in which one or both parents worked full-time), 116 were included in the primary outcome analysis, and 66-19 were included in analyses of secondary outcomes.
Patients had been in the PICU at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 1.0 (0.2-3.2) years and had received a median of 5.5 (3.1-7.7) days of invasive mechanical ventilation.
The median age at testing for patients and matched siblings was 6.6 (5.4-9.1) and 8.4 (7.0-10.2) years, respectively. Interviews with parents and testing of patients were conducted a median (IQR) of 3.8 (3.2-5.2) and 5.2 (4.3-6.1) years, respectively, after hospitalization.
The most common etiologies of respiratory failure were bronchiolitis and asthma and pneumonia (44% and 37%, respectively). Beyond respiratory failure, most patients (72%) also had experienced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.
Patients had a lower mean estimated IQ, compared with the matched siblings (101.5 vs. 104.3; mean difference, –2.8 [95% confidence interval, –5.4 to –0.2]), and more patients than siblings had an estimated IQ of ≤5 but not of ≤70.
Patients also had significantly lower scores on nonverbal memory, visuospatial skills, and fine motor control (mean differences, –0.9 [–1.6 to –0.3]; –0.9 [–1.8 to –.1]; and –-3.1 [–4.9 to –1.4], respectively), compared with matched siblings. They also had significantly higher scores on processing speed (mean difference, 4.4 [0.2-8.5]). There were no significant differences in the other secondary outcomes.
Differences in scores between patients and siblings varied significantly by age at hospitalization in several tests – for example, Block Design scores in patients were lower than those of siblings for patients hospitalized at <1 year old, versus those hospitalized between ages 4 and 8 years.
“When adjusting for patient age at PICU admission, patient age at testing, sibling age at testing, and duration between hospital discharge and testing, the difference in estimated IQ between patients and siblings remained statistically significantly different,” the authors note.
The investigators point out several limitations, including the fact that “little is known about sibling outcomes after critical illness, nor about whether parenting of siblings or child development differs based on birth order or on relationship between patient critical illness and the birth of siblings. ... If siblings also incur negative effects related to the critical illness, differences between critically ill children and the control siblings would be blunted.”
Despite the statistical significance of the difference between the patients and the matched controls, ultimately, the magnitude of the difference was “small and of uncertain clinical importance,” the authors conclude.
Filling a research gap
Commenting on the findings, Alexandre T. Rotta, MD, professor of pediatrics and chief of the division of pediatric critical care medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., said the study “addresses an important yet vastly understudied gap: long-term neurocognitive morbidity in children exposed to critical care.”
Dr. Rotta, who is also a coauthor of an accompanying editorial, noted that the fact that the “vast majority of children with an IQ significantly lower than their siblings were under the age of 4 years suggests that the developing immature brain may be particularly susceptible to the effects of critical illness and therapies required to treat it.”
The study “underscores the need to include assessments of long-term morbidity as part of any future trial evaluating interventions in pediatric critical care,” he added.
The study was supported by grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for RESTORE-Cognition and by grants for the RESTORE trial from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health. Dr. Watson and coauthors report no relevant financial relationships. Dr. Rotta has received personal fees from Vapotherm for lecturing and development of educational materials and from Breas US for participation in a scientific advisory board, as well as royalties from Elsevier for editorial work outside the submitted work. His coauthor reports no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM JAMA
Beware of the latest TikTok trend: Nasal spray tans
Although nasal spray tanning is being described as a new “viral” trend, it seems to have gotten its start as early as the spring of 2021. The tanning method appears to be especially popular in the United Kingdom, where self-tanning product brands have TikTok videos promoting nasal sprays.
The rising concerns of this and other viral TikTok trends has now prompted a bipartisan group of seven state attorneys general to launch an investigation.
“As children and teens already grapple with issues of anxiety, social pressure, and depression, we cannot allow social media to further harm their physical health and mental wellbeing,” Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, a Democrat, said in a statement. “State attorneys general have an imperative to protect young people and seek more information about how companies like TikTok are influencing their daily lives.”
Ms. Healey, along with colleagues from California, Florida, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Vermont, will whether Chinese-based TikTok violates state consumer protection laws.
The trend of people shooting spray tan up their nose is just the latest in a long line of so-called TikTok challenges that have caused controversy, and often, injury.
In a February TikTok, put out by the British company So Tanned (@_sotanned), a young woman appears with text stating that she uses nasal spray “morning and night” and then adds self-tanning oral drops a half hour before getting into a tanning bed.
But, dermatologist Lily Talakoub, MD, of McLean, Va., posted a TikTok with the bold warning “DO NOT USE NASAL TANNING SPRAY!” In the video, the white coat–clad Dr. Talakoub is in the foreground of the TikTok made by @Sashawoodx.
“Don’t try this at home,” said Dr. Talakoub.
“Don’t try this even if you think it can make you tanner. It can cause nausea, vomiting, very bad side effects,” she said, adding “this can be very dangerous to your health.”
It’s also worth mentioning that self-tanning products are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for inhalation.
Still, another U.K. company, 2btanned, posted a TikTok showing a user spraying the product up his nose and, in the comments, @2btanned suggested that the spray should be used at least a week or two before sun exposure “in order to get full effects.”
@Sashawoodx tells her viewers: “Don’t walk ... RUN for these products,” as she shows herself in several different outfits, squirting 2btanned spray up her nose. As of March 2, the TikTok video had been viewed over 212,000 times.
TikTokker @giannaarose, who has 125,000 followers, said in a video that she uses two to three sprays up the nose before stepping into the tanning bed. A commenter said, “this is scary but where do I buy it”.
The main ingredient in self-tanning products is dihydroxyacetone, or DHA. DHA, which is FDA-approved for use on skin, causes a chemical reaction when heat is applied, and a pigment is deposited on the skin.
Adam Friedman, MD, professor and chair of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington, said, given that self-tanning products were never meant to be inhaled and that nasal sprays of any kind must be approved by the FDA, a company promoting the products is engaged in a dangerous game.
“People could go to jail over this,” said Dr. Friedman. What’s more, the products are unlikely to produce a tan.
“Because of the way self-tanners work, it would make no sense,” said Dr. Friedman.
“It’s purely a camouflage,” he said, adding that it does not produce melanin. Self-tanners were never intended to be inhaled, “so who knows what those ingredients would do to a different anatomical site like the inner passages of the nose.”
At a minimum, spraying into the nose could at cause irritation. But it could also potentially lead to acute or long-term damage, he said.
Some other spray ingredients, such as tyrosine and tyrosinase, are involved in producing melanin, but they only act within skin cells. If sprayed into the nose, the ingredients might produce melanin inside the nose, but not on the skin.
“This is not going to work,” said Dr. Friedman. “If anything, it could be dangerous.”
He added that there’s no such thing as a safe tan, and that self-tanning products offer no protection from dangerous ultraviolet rays. The nasal sprays are “quick fixes” that are not going to work.
“At the end of the day, just don’t inhale,” Dr. Friedman said.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Although nasal spray tanning is being described as a new “viral” trend, it seems to have gotten its start as early as the spring of 2021. The tanning method appears to be especially popular in the United Kingdom, where self-tanning product brands have TikTok videos promoting nasal sprays.
The rising concerns of this and other viral TikTok trends has now prompted a bipartisan group of seven state attorneys general to launch an investigation.
“As children and teens already grapple with issues of anxiety, social pressure, and depression, we cannot allow social media to further harm their physical health and mental wellbeing,” Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, a Democrat, said in a statement. “State attorneys general have an imperative to protect young people and seek more information about how companies like TikTok are influencing their daily lives.”
Ms. Healey, along with colleagues from California, Florida, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Vermont, will whether Chinese-based TikTok violates state consumer protection laws.
The trend of people shooting spray tan up their nose is just the latest in a long line of so-called TikTok challenges that have caused controversy, and often, injury.
In a February TikTok, put out by the British company So Tanned (@_sotanned), a young woman appears with text stating that she uses nasal spray “morning and night” and then adds self-tanning oral drops a half hour before getting into a tanning bed.
But, dermatologist Lily Talakoub, MD, of McLean, Va., posted a TikTok with the bold warning “DO NOT USE NASAL TANNING SPRAY!” In the video, the white coat–clad Dr. Talakoub is in the foreground of the TikTok made by @Sashawoodx.
“Don’t try this at home,” said Dr. Talakoub.
“Don’t try this even if you think it can make you tanner. It can cause nausea, vomiting, very bad side effects,” she said, adding “this can be very dangerous to your health.”
It’s also worth mentioning that self-tanning products are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for inhalation.
Still, another U.K. company, 2btanned, posted a TikTok showing a user spraying the product up his nose and, in the comments, @2btanned suggested that the spray should be used at least a week or two before sun exposure “in order to get full effects.”
@Sashawoodx tells her viewers: “Don’t walk ... RUN for these products,” as she shows herself in several different outfits, squirting 2btanned spray up her nose. As of March 2, the TikTok video had been viewed over 212,000 times.
TikTokker @giannaarose, who has 125,000 followers, said in a video that she uses two to three sprays up the nose before stepping into the tanning bed. A commenter said, “this is scary but where do I buy it”.
The main ingredient in self-tanning products is dihydroxyacetone, or DHA. DHA, which is FDA-approved for use on skin, causes a chemical reaction when heat is applied, and a pigment is deposited on the skin.
Adam Friedman, MD, professor and chair of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington, said, given that self-tanning products were never meant to be inhaled and that nasal sprays of any kind must be approved by the FDA, a company promoting the products is engaged in a dangerous game.
“People could go to jail over this,” said Dr. Friedman. What’s more, the products are unlikely to produce a tan.
“Because of the way self-tanners work, it would make no sense,” said Dr. Friedman.
“It’s purely a camouflage,” he said, adding that it does not produce melanin. Self-tanners were never intended to be inhaled, “so who knows what those ingredients would do to a different anatomical site like the inner passages of the nose.”
At a minimum, spraying into the nose could at cause irritation. But it could also potentially lead to acute or long-term damage, he said.
Some other spray ingredients, such as tyrosine and tyrosinase, are involved in producing melanin, but they only act within skin cells. If sprayed into the nose, the ingredients might produce melanin inside the nose, but not on the skin.
“This is not going to work,” said Dr. Friedman. “If anything, it could be dangerous.”
He added that there’s no such thing as a safe tan, and that self-tanning products offer no protection from dangerous ultraviolet rays. The nasal sprays are “quick fixes” that are not going to work.
“At the end of the day, just don’t inhale,” Dr. Friedman said.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Although nasal spray tanning is being described as a new “viral” trend, it seems to have gotten its start as early as the spring of 2021. The tanning method appears to be especially popular in the United Kingdom, where self-tanning product brands have TikTok videos promoting nasal sprays.
The rising concerns of this and other viral TikTok trends has now prompted a bipartisan group of seven state attorneys general to launch an investigation.
“As children and teens already grapple with issues of anxiety, social pressure, and depression, we cannot allow social media to further harm their physical health and mental wellbeing,” Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, a Democrat, said in a statement. “State attorneys general have an imperative to protect young people and seek more information about how companies like TikTok are influencing their daily lives.”
Ms. Healey, along with colleagues from California, Florida, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Vermont, will whether Chinese-based TikTok violates state consumer protection laws.
The trend of people shooting spray tan up their nose is just the latest in a long line of so-called TikTok challenges that have caused controversy, and often, injury.
In a February TikTok, put out by the British company So Tanned (@_sotanned), a young woman appears with text stating that she uses nasal spray “morning and night” and then adds self-tanning oral drops a half hour before getting into a tanning bed.
But, dermatologist Lily Talakoub, MD, of McLean, Va., posted a TikTok with the bold warning “DO NOT USE NASAL TANNING SPRAY!” In the video, the white coat–clad Dr. Talakoub is in the foreground of the TikTok made by @Sashawoodx.
“Don’t try this at home,” said Dr. Talakoub.
“Don’t try this even if you think it can make you tanner. It can cause nausea, vomiting, very bad side effects,” she said, adding “this can be very dangerous to your health.”
It’s also worth mentioning that self-tanning products are not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for inhalation.
Still, another U.K. company, 2btanned, posted a TikTok showing a user spraying the product up his nose and, in the comments, @2btanned suggested that the spray should be used at least a week or two before sun exposure “in order to get full effects.”
@Sashawoodx tells her viewers: “Don’t walk ... RUN for these products,” as she shows herself in several different outfits, squirting 2btanned spray up her nose. As of March 2, the TikTok video had been viewed over 212,000 times.
TikTokker @giannaarose, who has 125,000 followers, said in a video that she uses two to three sprays up the nose before stepping into the tanning bed. A commenter said, “this is scary but where do I buy it”.
The main ingredient in self-tanning products is dihydroxyacetone, or DHA. DHA, which is FDA-approved for use on skin, causes a chemical reaction when heat is applied, and a pigment is deposited on the skin.
Adam Friedman, MD, professor and chair of dermatology at George Washington University, Washington, said, given that self-tanning products were never meant to be inhaled and that nasal sprays of any kind must be approved by the FDA, a company promoting the products is engaged in a dangerous game.
“People could go to jail over this,” said Dr. Friedman. What’s more, the products are unlikely to produce a tan.
“Because of the way self-tanners work, it would make no sense,” said Dr. Friedman.
“It’s purely a camouflage,” he said, adding that it does not produce melanin. Self-tanners were never intended to be inhaled, “so who knows what those ingredients would do to a different anatomical site like the inner passages of the nose.”
At a minimum, spraying into the nose could at cause irritation. But it could also potentially lead to acute or long-term damage, he said.
Some other spray ingredients, such as tyrosine and tyrosinase, are involved in producing melanin, but they only act within skin cells. If sprayed into the nose, the ingredients might produce melanin inside the nose, but not on the skin.
“This is not going to work,” said Dr. Friedman. “If anything, it could be dangerous.”
He added that there’s no such thing as a safe tan, and that self-tanning products offer no protection from dangerous ultraviolet rays. The nasal sprays are “quick fixes” that are not going to work.
“At the end of the day, just don’t inhale,” Dr. Friedman said.
A version of this article first appeared on WebMD.com.
Nirsevimab protects healthy infants from RSV
A single injection of the experimental agent nirsevimab ahead of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season protects healthy infants from lower respiratory tract infections associated with the pathogen, according to the results of a phase 3 study.
A previously published trial showed that a single dose of nirsevimab was effective in preterm infants. The ability to protect all babies from RSV, which causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia and is a leading cause of hospitalization for this age group, “would be a paradigm shift in the approach to this disease,” William Muller, MD, PhD, of the Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and a coauthor of the study, said in a statement.
The primary endpoint of the study was medically attended lower respiratory tract infections linked to RSV. The single injection of nirsevimab was associated with a 74.5% reduction in such infections (P < .001), according to Dr. Muller’s group, who published their findings March 2 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Nirsevimab, a monoclonal antibody to the RSV fusion protein being developed by AstraZeneca and Sanofi, has an extended half-life, which may allow one dose to confer protection throughout a season. The only approved option to prevent RSV, palivizumab (Synagis), is used for high-risk infants, and five injections are needed to cover a viral season.
Nearly 1,500 infants in more than 20 countries studied
To assess the effectiveness of nirsevimab in late-preterm and term infants, investigators at 160 sites randomly assigned 1,490 babies born at a gestational age of at least 35 weeks to receive an intramuscular injection of nirsevimab or placebo.
During the 150 days after injection, medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections occurred in 12 of 994 infants who received nirsevimab, compared with 25 of 496 babies who received placebo (1.2% vs. 5%).
Six of 994 infants who received nirsevimab were hospitalized for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections, compared with 8 of 496 infants in the placebo group (0.6% vs. 1.6%; P = .07). The proportion of children hospitalized for any respiratory illness as a result of RSV was 0.9% among those who received nirsevimab, compared with 2.2% among those who received placebo.
Serious adverse events occurred in 6.8% of the nirsevimab group and 7.3% of the placebo group. None of these events, including three deaths in the nirsevimab group, was considered related to nirsevimab or placebo, according to the researchers. One infant who received nirsevimab had a generalized macular rash without systemic features that did not require treatment and resolved in 20 days, they said.
Antidrug antibodies were detected in 6.1% of the nirsevimab group and in 1.1% of the placebo group. These antidrug antibodies tended to develop later and did not affect nirsevimab pharmacokinetics during the RSV season, the researchers reported. How they might affect subsequent doses of nirsevimab is not known, they added.
In a separate report in the journal, researcher Joseph Domachowske, MD, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, and colleagues described safety results from an ongoing study of nirsevimab that includes infants with congenital heart disease, chronic lung disease, and prematurity.
In this trial, infants received nirsevimab or palivizumab, and the treatments appeared to have similar safety profiles, the authors reported.
Other approaches to RSV protection include passive antibodies acquired from maternal vaccination in pregnancy and active vaccination of infants.
The publication follows news last month that GlaxoSmithKline is pausing a maternal RSV vaccine trial, which “had the same goal of protecting babies against severe RSV infection,” said Louis Bont, MD, PhD, with University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
RSV infection is one of the deadliest diseases during infancy, and the nirsevimab trial, conducted in more than 20 countries, is “gamechanging,” Dr. Bont told this news organization. Still, researchers will need to monitor for RSV resistance to this treatment, he said.
Whether nirsevimab prevents the development of reactive airway disease and asthma is another open question, he said.
“Finally, we need to keep in mind that RSV mortality is almost limited to the developing world, and it is unlikely that this novel drug will become available to these countries in the coming years,” Dr. Bont said. “Nevertheless, nirsevimab has the potential to seriously decrease the annual overwhelming number of RSV infected babies.”
Nirsevimab may have advantages in low- and middle-income countries, including its potential to be incorporated into established immunization programs and to be given seasonally, said Amy Sarah Ginsburg, MD, MPH, of the University of Washington, Seattle. “However, cost remains a significant factor, as does susceptibility to pathogen escape,” she said.
MedImmune/AstraZeneca and Sanofi funded the nirsevimab studies. UMC Utrecht has received research grants and fees for advisory work from AstraZeneca for RSV-related work by Bont.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
A single injection of the experimental agent nirsevimab ahead of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season protects healthy infants from lower respiratory tract infections associated with the pathogen, according to the results of a phase 3 study.
A previously published trial showed that a single dose of nirsevimab was effective in preterm infants. The ability to protect all babies from RSV, which causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia and is a leading cause of hospitalization for this age group, “would be a paradigm shift in the approach to this disease,” William Muller, MD, PhD, of the Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and a coauthor of the study, said in a statement.
The primary endpoint of the study was medically attended lower respiratory tract infections linked to RSV. The single injection of nirsevimab was associated with a 74.5% reduction in such infections (P < .001), according to Dr. Muller’s group, who published their findings March 2 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Nirsevimab, a monoclonal antibody to the RSV fusion protein being developed by AstraZeneca and Sanofi, has an extended half-life, which may allow one dose to confer protection throughout a season. The only approved option to prevent RSV, palivizumab (Synagis), is used for high-risk infants, and five injections are needed to cover a viral season.
Nearly 1,500 infants in more than 20 countries studied
To assess the effectiveness of nirsevimab in late-preterm and term infants, investigators at 160 sites randomly assigned 1,490 babies born at a gestational age of at least 35 weeks to receive an intramuscular injection of nirsevimab or placebo.
During the 150 days after injection, medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections occurred in 12 of 994 infants who received nirsevimab, compared with 25 of 496 babies who received placebo (1.2% vs. 5%).
Six of 994 infants who received nirsevimab were hospitalized for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections, compared with 8 of 496 infants in the placebo group (0.6% vs. 1.6%; P = .07). The proportion of children hospitalized for any respiratory illness as a result of RSV was 0.9% among those who received nirsevimab, compared with 2.2% among those who received placebo.
Serious adverse events occurred in 6.8% of the nirsevimab group and 7.3% of the placebo group. None of these events, including three deaths in the nirsevimab group, was considered related to nirsevimab or placebo, according to the researchers. One infant who received nirsevimab had a generalized macular rash without systemic features that did not require treatment and resolved in 20 days, they said.
Antidrug antibodies were detected in 6.1% of the nirsevimab group and in 1.1% of the placebo group. These antidrug antibodies tended to develop later and did not affect nirsevimab pharmacokinetics during the RSV season, the researchers reported. How they might affect subsequent doses of nirsevimab is not known, they added.
In a separate report in the journal, researcher Joseph Domachowske, MD, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, and colleagues described safety results from an ongoing study of nirsevimab that includes infants with congenital heart disease, chronic lung disease, and prematurity.
In this trial, infants received nirsevimab or palivizumab, and the treatments appeared to have similar safety profiles, the authors reported.
Other approaches to RSV protection include passive antibodies acquired from maternal vaccination in pregnancy and active vaccination of infants.
The publication follows news last month that GlaxoSmithKline is pausing a maternal RSV vaccine trial, which “had the same goal of protecting babies against severe RSV infection,” said Louis Bont, MD, PhD, with University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
RSV infection is one of the deadliest diseases during infancy, and the nirsevimab trial, conducted in more than 20 countries, is “gamechanging,” Dr. Bont told this news organization. Still, researchers will need to monitor for RSV resistance to this treatment, he said.
Whether nirsevimab prevents the development of reactive airway disease and asthma is another open question, he said.
“Finally, we need to keep in mind that RSV mortality is almost limited to the developing world, and it is unlikely that this novel drug will become available to these countries in the coming years,” Dr. Bont said. “Nevertheless, nirsevimab has the potential to seriously decrease the annual overwhelming number of RSV infected babies.”
Nirsevimab may have advantages in low- and middle-income countries, including its potential to be incorporated into established immunization programs and to be given seasonally, said Amy Sarah Ginsburg, MD, MPH, of the University of Washington, Seattle. “However, cost remains a significant factor, as does susceptibility to pathogen escape,” she said.
MedImmune/AstraZeneca and Sanofi funded the nirsevimab studies. UMC Utrecht has received research grants and fees for advisory work from AstraZeneca for RSV-related work by Bont.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
A single injection of the experimental agent nirsevimab ahead of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) season protects healthy infants from lower respiratory tract infections associated with the pathogen, according to the results of a phase 3 study.
A previously published trial showed that a single dose of nirsevimab was effective in preterm infants. The ability to protect all babies from RSV, which causes bronchiolitis and pneumonia and is a leading cause of hospitalization for this age group, “would be a paradigm shift in the approach to this disease,” William Muller, MD, PhD, of the Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and a coauthor of the study, said in a statement.
The primary endpoint of the study was medically attended lower respiratory tract infections linked to RSV. The single injection of nirsevimab was associated with a 74.5% reduction in such infections (P < .001), according to Dr. Muller’s group, who published their findings March 2 in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Nirsevimab, a monoclonal antibody to the RSV fusion protein being developed by AstraZeneca and Sanofi, has an extended half-life, which may allow one dose to confer protection throughout a season. The only approved option to prevent RSV, palivizumab (Synagis), is used for high-risk infants, and five injections are needed to cover a viral season.
Nearly 1,500 infants in more than 20 countries studied
To assess the effectiveness of nirsevimab in late-preterm and term infants, investigators at 160 sites randomly assigned 1,490 babies born at a gestational age of at least 35 weeks to receive an intramuscular injection of nirsevimab or placebo.
During the 150 days after injection, medically attended RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections occurred in 12 of 994 infants who received nirsevimab, compared with 25 of 496 babies who received placebo (1.2% vs. 5%).
Six of 994 infants who received nirsevimab were hospitalized for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infections, compared with 8 of 496 infants in the placebo group (0.6% vs. 1.6%; P = .07). The proportion of children hospitalized for any respiratory illness as a result of RSV was 0.9% among those who received nirsevimab, compared with 2.2% among those who received placebo.
Serious adverse events occurred in 6.8% of the nirsevimab group and 7.3% of the placebo group. None of these events, including three deaths in the nirsevimab group, was considered related to nirsevimab or placebo, according to the researchers. One infant who received nirsevimab had a generalized macular rash without systemic features that did not require treatment and resolved in 20 days, they said.
Antidrug antibodies were detected in 6.1% of the nirsevimab group and in 1.1% of the placebo group. These antidrug antibodies tended to develop later and did not affect nirsevimab pharmacokinetics during the RSV season, the researchers reported. How they might affect subsequent doses of nirsevimab is not known, they added.
In a separate report in the journal, researcher Joseph Domachowske, MD, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, and colleagues described safety results from an ongoing study of nirsevimab that includes infants with congenital heart disease, chronic lung disease, and prematurity.
In this trial, infants received nirsevimab or palivizumab, and the treatments appeared to have similar safety profiles, the authors reported.
Other approaches to RSV protection include passive antibodies acquired from maternal vaccination in pregnancy and active vaccination of infants.
The publication follows news last month that GlaxoSmithKline is pausing a maternal RSV vaccine trial, which “had the same goal of protecting babies against severe RSV infection,” said Louis Bont, MD, PhD, with University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.
RSV infection is one of the deadliest diseases during infancy, and the nirsevimab trial, conducted in more than 20 countries, is “gamechanging,” Dr. Bont told this news organization. Still, researchers will need to monitor for RSV resistance to this treatment, he said.
Whether nirsevimab prevents the development of reactive airway disease and asthma is another open question, he said.
“Finally, we need to keep in mind that RSV mortality is almost limited to the developing world, and it is unlikely that this novel drug will become available to these countries in the coming years,” Dr. Bont said. “Nevertheless, nirsevimab has the potential to seriously decrease the annual overwhelming number of RSV infected babies.”
Nirsevimab may have advantages in low- and middle-income countries, including its potential to be incorporated into established immunization programs and to be given seasonally, said Amy Sarah Ginsburg, MD, MPH, of the University of Washington, Seattle. “However, cost remains a significant factor, as does susceptibility to pathogen escape,” she said.
MedImmune/AstraZeneca and Sanofi funded the nirsevimab studies. UMC Utrecht has received research grants and fees for advisory work from AstraZeneca for RSV-related work by Bont.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Pediatric IBD increases cancer risk later in life
Children who are diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are more than twice as likely to develop cancer, especially gastrointestinal cancer, later in life compared with the general pediatric population, a new meta-analysis suggests.
Although the overall incidence rate of cancer in this population is low, “we found a 2.4-fold increase in the relative rate of cancer among patients with pediatric-onset IBD compared with the general pediatric population, primarily associated with an increased rate of gastrointestinal cancers,” wrote senior author Tine Jess, MD, DMSci, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, and colleagues.
The study was published online March 1 in JAMA Network Open.
Previous research indicates that IBD is associated with an increased risk for colon, small bowel, and other types of cancer in adults, but the risk among children with IBD is not well understood.
In the current analysis, Dr. Jess and colleagues examined five population-based studies from North America and Europe, which included more than 19,800 participants with pediatric-onset IBD. Of these participants, 715 were later diagnosed with cancer.
Overall, the risk for cancer among individuals with pediatric-onset IBD was 2.4-fold higher than that of their peers without IBD, but those rates varied by IBD subtype. Those with Crohn’s disease, for instance, were about two times more likely to develop cancer, while those with ulcerative colitis were 2.6 times more likely to develop cancer later.
Two studies included in the meta-analysis broke down results by sex and found that the risk for cancer was higher among male versus female patients (pooled relative rates [pRR], 3.23 in men and 2.45 in women).
These two studies also calculated the risk for cancer by exposure to thiopurines. Patients receiving these immunosuppressive drugs had an increased relative rate of cancer (pRR, 2.09). Although numerically higher, this rate was not statistically higher compared with patients not exposed to the drugs (pRR, 1.82).
When looking at risk by cancer site, the authors consistently observed the highest relative rates for gastrointestinal cancers. Specifically, the investigators calculated a 55-fold increased risk for liver cancer (pRR, 55.4), followed by a 20-fold increased risk for colorectal cancer (pRR, 20.2), and a 16-fold increased risk for small bowel cancer (pRR, 16.2).
Despite such high estimates for gastrointestinal cancers, “this risk corresponds to a mean incidence rate of 0.3 cases of liver cancer, 0.6 cases of colorectal cancer, and 0.1 cases of small bowel cancer per 1,000 person-years in this population,” the authors noted.
In other words, “the overall incidence rate of cancer in this population is low,” at less than 3.3 cases per 1,000 person-years, the authors concluded.
Relative rates of extraintestinal cancers were even lower, with the highest risks for nonmelanoma skin cancer (pRR, 3.62), lymphoid cancer (pRR, 3.10), and melanoma (pRR, 2.05).
The authors suggest that identifying variables that might reduce cancer risk in pediatric patients who develop IBD could better shape management and prevention strategies.
CRC screening guidelines already recommend that children undergo a colonoscopy 6-8 years after being diagnosed with colitis extending beyond the rectum. Annual colonoscopy is also recommended for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis from the time of diagnosis and annual screening for skin cancer is recommended for all patients with IBD.
The investigators further suggest that because ongoing inflammation is an important risk factor for cancer, early and adequate control of inflammation could be critical in the prevention of long-term complications.
The study was supported by a grant from the Danish National Research Foundation. Dr. Jess and coauthors Rahma Elmahdi, MD, Camilla Lemser, and Kristine Allin, MD, reported receiving grants from the Danish National Research Foundation National Center of Excellence during the conduct of the study. Coauthor Manasi Agrawal, MD, reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases during the conduct of the study.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Children who are diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are more than twice as likely to develop cancer, especially gastrointestinal cancer, later in life compared with the general pediatric population, a new meta-analysis suggests.
Although the overall incidence rate of cancer in this population is low, “we found a 2.4-fold increase in the relative rate of cancer among patients with pediatric-onset IBD compared with the general pediatric population, primarily associated with an increased rate of gastrointestinal cancers,” wrote senior author Tine Jess, MD, DMSci, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, and colleagues.
The study was published online March 1 in JAMA Network Open.
Previous research indicates that IBD is associated with an increased risk for colon, small bowel, and other types of cancer in adults, but the risk among children with IBD is not well understood.
In the current analysis, Dr. Jess and colleagues examined five population-based studies from North America and Europe, which included more than 19,800 participants with pediatric-onset IBD. Of these participants, 715 were later diagnosed with cancer.
Overall, the risk for cancer among individuals with pediatric-onset IBD was 2.4-fold higher than that of their peers without IBD, but those rates varied by IBD subtype. Those with Crohn’s disease, for instance, were about two times more likely to develop cancer, while those with ulcerative colitis were 2.6 times more likely to develop cancer later.
Two studies included in the meta-analysis broke down results by sex and found that the risk for cancer was higher among male versus female patients (pooled relative rates [pRR], 3.23 in men and 2.45 in women).
These two studies also calculated the risk for cancer by exposure to thiopurines. Patients receiving these immunosuppressive drugs had an increased relative rate of cancer (pRR, 2.09). Although numerically higher, this rate was not statistically higher compared with patients not exposed to the drugs (pRR, 1.82).
When looking at risk by cancer site, the authors consistently observed the highest relative rates for gastrointestinal cancers. Specifically, the investigators calculated a 55-fold increased risk for liver cancer (pRR, 55.4), followed by a 20-fold increased risk for colorectal cancer (pRR, 20.2), and a 16-fold increased risk for small bowel cancer (pRR, 16.2).
Despite such high estimates for gastrointestinal cancers, “this risk corresponds to a mean incidence rate of 0.3 cases of liver cancer, 0.6 cases of colorectal cancer, and 0.1 cases of small bowel cancer per 1,000 person-years in this population,” the authors noted.
In other words, “the overall incidence rate of cancer in this population is low,” at less than 3.3 cases per 1,000 person-years, the authors concluded.
Relative rates of extraintestinal cancers were even lower, with the highest risks for nonmelanoma skin cancer (pRR, 3.62), lymphoid cancer (pRR, 3.10), and melanoma (pRR, 2.05).
The authors suggest that identifying variables that might reduce cancer risk in pediatric patients who develop IBD could better shape management and prevention strategies.
CRC screening guidelines already recommend that children undergo a colonoscopy 6-8 years after being diagnosed with colitis extending beyond the rectum. Annual colonoscopy is also recommended for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis from the time of diagnosis and annual screening for skin cancer is recommended for all patients with IBD.
The investigators further suggest that because ongoing inflammation is an important risk factor for cancer, early and adequate control of inflammation could be critical in the prevention of long-term complications.
The study was supported by a grant from the Danish National Research Foundation. Dr. Jess and coauthors Rahma Elmahdi, MD, Camilla Lemser, and Kristine Allin, MD, reported receiving grants from the Danish National Research Foundation National Center of Excellence during the conduct of the study. Coauthor Manasi Agrawal, MD, reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases during the conduct of the study.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Children who are diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are more than twice as likely to develop cancer, especially gastrointestinal cancer, later in life compared with the general pediatric population, a new meta-analysis suggests.
Although the overall incidence rate of cancer in this population is low, “we found a 2.4-fold increase in the relative rate of cancer among patients with pediatric-onset IBD compared with the general pediatric population, primarily associated with an increased rate of gastrointestinal cancers,” wrote senior author Tine Jess, MD, DMSci, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, and colleagues.
The study was published online March 1 in JAMA Network Open.
Previous research indicates that IBD is associated with an increased risk for colon, small bowel, and other types of cancer in adults, but the risk among children with IBD is not well understood.
In the current analysis, Dr. Jess and colleagues examined five population-based studies from North America and Europe, which included more than 19,800 participants with pediatric-onset IBD. Of these participants, 715 were later diagnosed with cancer.
Overall, the risk for cancer among individuals with pediatric-onset IBD was 2.4-fold higher than that of their peers without IBD, but those rates varied by IBD subtype. Those with Crohn’s disease, for instance, were about two times more likely to develop cancer, while those with ulcerative colitis were 2.6 times more likely to develop cancer later.
Two studies included in the meta-analysis broke down results by sex and found that the risk for cancer was higher among male versus female patients (pooled relative rates [pRR], 3.23 in men and 2.45 in women).
These two studies also calculated the risk for cancer by exposure to thiopurines. Patients receiving these immunosuppressive drugs had an increased relative rate of cancer (pRR, 2.09). Although numerically higher, this rate was not statistically higher compared with patients not exposed to the drugs (pRR, 1.82).
When looking at risk by cancer site, the authors consistently observed the highest relative rates for gastrointestinal cancers. Specifically, the investigators calculated a 55-fold increased risk for liver cancer (pRR, 55.4), followed by a 20-fold increased risk for colorectal cancer (pRR, 20.2), and a 16-fold increased risk for small bowel cancer (pRR, 16.2).
Despite such high estimates for gastrointestinal cancers, “this risk corresponds to a mean incidence rate of 0.3 cases of liver cancer, 0.6 cases of colorectal cancer, and 0.1 cases of small bowel cancer per 1,000 person-years in this population,” the authors noted.
In other words, “the overall incidence rate of cancer in this population is low,” at less than 3.3 cases per 1,000 person-years, the authors concluded.
Relative rates of extraintestinal cancers were even lower, with the highest risks for nonmelanoma skin cancer (pRR, 3.62), lymphoid cancer (pRR, 3.10), and melanoma (pRR, 2.05).
The authors suggest that identifying variables that might reduce cancer risk in pediatric patients who develop IBD could better shape management and prevention strategies.
CRC screening guidelines already recommend that children undergo a colonoscopy 6-8 years after being diagnosed with colitis extending beyond the rectum. Annual colonoscopy is also recommended for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis from the time of diagnosis and annual screening for skin cancer is recommended for all patients with IBD.
The investigators further suggest that because ongoing inflammation is an important risk factor for cancer, early and adequate control of inflammation could be critical in the prevention of long-term complications.
The study was supported by a grant from the Danish National Research Foundation. Dr. Jess and coauthors Rahma Elmahdi, MD, Camilla Lemser, and Kristine Allin, MD, reported receiving grants from the Danish National Research Foundation National Center of Excellence during the conduct of the study. Coauthor Manasi Agrawal, MD, reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases during the conduct of the study.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
FROM JAMA NETWORK
Dupilumab shows histological and clinical benefit in larger eosinophilic esophagitis cohort
The late-breaking data on Part B of the LIBERTY EoE TREET study drew a standing-room-only crowd at the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) annual meeting.
EoE is a chronic, progressive, type 2 inflammatory disease resulting from esophageal build-up of eosinophils, which injures the tissue and leads to swallowing difficulties. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks type 2 immune responses, is currently approved to treat poorly controlled atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.
Dupilumab also showed benefits in patients with hard-to-treat EoE in a phase 3 trial (LIBERTY EoE TREET 28-week extension of Part A), reported by Medscape Medical News in October from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) annual meeting.
Part B enrolled 159 EoE patients 12 years or older and tested the efficacy and safety of weekly 300 mg dupilumab versus placebo injections for 24 weeks. More than half of the participants had previously tried swallowed topical corticosteroids, and about 30% were on a food elimination diet. (Generally, corticosteroids and elimination diets are about 70% effective in EoE.)
Compared with placebo, 6 months of weekly dupilumab reduced eosinophils in the esophagus and produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the ability to swallow.
Treated participants saw a 64% reduction in disease symptoms (23.8-point improvement on the self-reported Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire [DSQ]), compared with 41% reduction (13.9 point DSQ improvement) in the placebo group.
Histologically, dupilumab reduced peak eosinophil counts to 6 or lower in 59% of patients, whereas only 6% achieved disease remission on placebo.
On safety, dupilumab was generally well tolerated. The most common treatment adverse events were injection site reactions (occurring in about 20% of both groups) or injection site erythema (occurring in 10% of treated patients and 11.5% of placebo patients).
“These results replicate those in Part A in a larger sample size,” Marc Rothenberg, MD, PhD, director of the division of allergy and immunology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, noted in a prerecorded presentation.
Based on the phase 3 data, dupilumab seems “effective for patients who may have no other options for managing their EoE,” Brian Schroer, MD, director of allergy and immunology at Akron (Ohio) Children’s Hospital, said in an interview. Dr. Schroer expects EoE cases to rise as more food allergy patients begin oral immunotherapy (OIT), where studies have shown EoE as a side effect in about 4% of patients undergoing OIT.
In a live Q&A following the prerecorded talk, Evan Dellon, MD, professor of medicine and epidemiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told attendees that data from Part B’s second arm, which tested dupilumab injections given every other week, have not yet been presented. So far, histological results in this arm look identical to those of patients who received weekly dupilumab, though symptoms “did not meet statistical significance,” he said. “I think we’re going to have much more detail about those results at some conferences to come in the spring.”
LIBERTY EoE TREET was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron. Dr. Dellon and Dr. Rothenberg reported numerous conflicts of interest. Dr. Schroer has received consulting fees from Sanofi and Ready, Set, Food.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The late-breaking data on Part B of the LIBERTY EoE TREET study drew a standing-room-only crowd at the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) annual meeting.
EoE is a chronic, progressive, type 2 inflammatory disease resulting from esophageal build-up of eosinophils, which injures the tissue and leads to swallowing difficulties. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks type 2 immune responses, is currently approved to treat poorly controlled atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.
Dupilumab also showed benefits in patients with hard-to-treat EoE in a phase 3 trial (LIBERTY EoE TREET 28-week extension of Part A), reported by Medscape Medical News in October from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) annual meeting.
Part B enrolled 159 EoE patients 12 years or older and tested the efficacy and safety of weekly 300 mg dupilumab versus placebo injections for 24 weeks. More than half of the participants had previously tried swallowed topical corticosteroids, and about 30% were on a food elimination diet. (Generally, corticosteroids and elimination diets are about 70% effective in EoE.)
Compared with placebo, 6 months of weekly dupilumab reduced eosinophils in the esophagus and produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the ability to swallow.
Treated participants saw a 64% reduction in disease symptoms (23.8-point improvement on the self-reported Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire [DSQ]), compared with 41% reduction (13.9 point DSQ improvement) in the placebo group.
Histologically, dupilumab reduced peak eosinophil counts to 6 or lower in 59% of patients, whereas only 6% achieved disease remission on placebo.
On safety, dupilumab was generally well tolerated. The most common treatment adverse events were injection site reactions (occurring in about 20% of both groups) or injection site erythema (occurring in 10% of treated patients and 11.5% of placebo patients).
“These results replicate those in Part A in a larger sample size,” Marc Rothenberg, MD, PhD, director of the division of allergy and immunology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, noted in a prerecorded presentation.
Based on the phase 3 data, dupilumab seems “effective for patients who may have no other options for managing their EoE,” Brian Schroer, MD, director of allergy and immunology at Akron (Ohio) Children’s Hospital, said in an interview. Dr. Schroer expects EoE cases to rise as more food allergy patients begin oral immunotherapy (OIT), where studies have shown EoE as a side effect in about 4% of patients undergoing OIT.
In a live Q&A following the prerecorded talk, Evan Dellon, MD, professor of medicine and epidemiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told attendees that data from Part B’s second arm, which tested dupilumab injections given every other week, have not yet been presented. So far, histological results in this arm look identical to those of patients who received weekly dupilumab, though symptoms “did not meet statistical significance,” he said. “I think we’re going to have much more detail about those results at some conferences to come in the spring.”
LIBERTY EoE TREET was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron. Dr. Dellon and Dr. Rothenberg reported numerous conflicts of interest. Dr. Schroer has received consulting fees from Sanofi and Ready, Set, Food.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The late-breaking data on Part B of the LIBERTY EoE TREET study drew a standing-room-only crowd at the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (AAAAI) annual meeting.
EoE is a chronic, progressive, type 2 inflammatory disease resulting from esophageal build-up of eosinophils, which injures the tissue and leads to swallowing difficulties. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks type 2 immune responses, is currently approved to treat poorly controlled atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis.
Dupilumab also showed benefits in patients with hard-to-treat EoE in a phase 3 trial (LIBERTY EoE TREET 28-week extension of Part A), reported by Medscape Medical News in October from the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) annual meeting.
Part B enrolled 159 EoE patients 12 years or older and tested the efficacy and safety of weekly 300 mg dupilumab versus placebo injections for 24 weeks. More than half of the participants had previously tried swallowed topical corticosteroids, and about 30% were on a food elimination diet. (Generally, corticosteroids and elimination diets are about 70% effective in EoE.)
Compared with placebo, 6 months of weekly dupilumab reduced eosinophils in the esophagus and produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the ability to swallow.
Treated participants saw a 64% reduction in disease symptoms (23.8-point improvement on the self-reported Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire [DSQ]), compared with 41% reduction (13.9 point DSQ improvement) in the placebo group.
Histologically, dupilumab reduced peak eosinophil counts to 6 or lower in 59% of patients, whereas only 6% achieved disease remission on placebo.
On safety, dupilumab was generally well tolerated. The most common treatment adverse events were injection site reactions (occurring in about 20% of both groups) or injection site erythema (occurring in 10% of treated patients and 11.5% of placebo patients).
“These results replicate those in Part A in a larger sample size,” Marc Rothenberg, MD, PhD, director of the division of allergy and immunology at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, noted in a prerecorded presentation.
Based on the phase 3 data, dupilumab seems “effective for patients who may have no other options for managing their EoE,” Brian Schroer, MD, director of allergy and immunology at Akron (Ohio) Children’s Hospital, said in an interview. Dr. Schroer expects EoE cases to rise as more food allergy patients begin oral immunotherapy (OIT), where studies have shown EoE as a side effect in about 4% of patients undergoing OIT.
In a live Q&A following the prerecorded talk, Evan Dellon, MD, professor of medicine and epidemiology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told attendees that data from Part B’s second arm, which tested dupilumab injections given every other week, have not yet been presented. So far, histological results in this arm look identical to those of patients who received weekly dupilumab, though symptoms “did not meet statistical significance,” he said. “I think we’re going to have much more detail about those results at some conferences to come in the spring.”
LIBERTY EoE TREET was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron. Dr. Dellon and Dr. Rothenberg reported numerous conflicts of interest. Dr. Schroer has received consulting fees from Sanofi and Ready, Set, Food.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
REPORTING FROM AAAAI
All in the family
Six female doctors from two families share their journeys through medicine.
When Annie Uhing, MD, is stressed about work, she can call her mom. She and her mom are close, yes, but her mom is also a physician and understands the ups and downs of medical education and the unique challenges of being a woman in medicine.
“My mom and I were talking about this the other day – I don’t think we know any other mother-daughter pairs of doctors,” said Dr. Uhing.
In the United States, the number of female physicians has risen steadily since the mid- and late-20th century. As of 2019, women made up more than half of medical school classes across the country and 36.3% of the physician workforce.
Still, most female physicians are concentrated in a handful of specialties (such as pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology) while the percentages of women in other areas remains extremely low (urology and orthopedic surgery). Many female physicians share anecdotal stories about not being taken seriously, like when a patient mistook them for a nurse, or preferred the advice of a male colleague to their own.
To celebrate International Women’s Day, this news organization talked to two families of female doctors about their experiences in medicine and how they inspire and support one another inside and outside the hospital.
Deborah, Charlene, and Annie
When Deborah Gaebler-Spira, MD, started medical school at the University of Illinois in 1975, women made up just 15% of her class. “For me, the idea that as a woman you could have a vocation that could be quite meaningful and self-directed – that was very important,” said Dr. Gaebler-Spira, now a pediatric rehabilitation physician at the Shirley Ryan Ability Lab and professor at Northwestern University in Chicago.
She blocked out a lot of discouragement along the way. In undergrad, the dean of the college warned Dr. Gaebler-Spira she’d never make it as a doctor. In medical school interviews, administrators could be hostile. “There was this feeling that you were taking a place of someone who really deserved it,” she said. When selecting a residency, Dr. Gaebler-Spira decided against a career in obstetrics because of the overt misogyny in the field at the time.
Instead, she went into pediatrics and physical medicine and rehabilitation, eventually working to become an expert in cerebral palsy. Along the way, Dr. Gaebler-Spira made lifelong friends with other female physicians and found strong female mentors, including Billie Adams, MD, and Helen Emery, MD.
When her sister, Charlene Gaebler-Uhing, MD, also decided to go into medicine, Dr. Gaebler-Spira said she “thought it was a sign of sanity as she was always much more competitive than I was! And if I could do it, no question she was able!”
Dr. Gaebler-Uhing, now an adolescent medicine specialist at Children’s Wisconsin in Milwaukee, followed her older sister’s footsteps to medical school in 1983, after first considering a career in social work.
While there were now more women going into medicine – her medical school class was about 25% women – problems persisted. During clinical rotations in residency, Dr. Gaebler-Uhing was often the only woman on a team and made the conscious decision to go professionally by her nickname, Charlie. “If a woman’s name was on the consult, her opinion and insights did not get the same value or respect as a male physician’s,” she said. “The only way they knew I was a woman was if they really knew me.”
The Gaebler sisters leaned on each other professionally and personally throughout their careers. When both sisters practiced in Chicago, they referred patients to one another. And Dr. Gaebler-Uhing said her older sister was a great role model for how to balance the dual roles of physician and parent, as few of the older female doctors who trained her were married or had a child.
Now Dr. Gaebler-Uhing’s daughter, Annie Uhing, MD, is entering medicine herself. She is currently pediatric resident at the University of Wisconsin American Family Hospital. She plans to do a chief year and then a pediatric endocrinology fellowship.
Growing up, Dr. Uhing wasn’t always sure she wanted to work as much as her parents, who are both doctors. But her mom provided a great example few of her friends had at home: “If you want to work, you should work and do what you want to do and it’s not wrong to want to have a really high-powered job as a woman,” said Dr. Uhing.
Kathryn, Susan, and Rita
The three sisters Kathryn Hudson, MD, Susan Schmidt, MD, and Rita Butler, MD, were inspired to go into medicine by their mother, Rita Watson, MD, who was one of the first female interventional cardiologists in the United States.
“I think we had a front row seat to what being a doctor was like,” said Dr. Hudson, a hematologist and oncologist and director of survivorship at Texas Oncology in Austin. Both parents were MDs – their dad was a pharmaceutical researcher at Merck – and they would excitedly discuss patient cases and drug development at the dinner table, said Dr. Butler, an interventional cardiology fellow at the Lankenau Heart Institute in Wynnewood, Pa.
All three sisters have vivid memories of ‘Take Your Daughter to Work Day’ at their mom’s hospital. “I remember going to Take Your Daughter to Work Day with her and watching her in action and thinking, oh my gosh, my mom is so cool and I want to be like her,” said Dr. Schmidt, a pediatric critical care specialist at St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children in Philadelphia. “I’ve always felt special that my mom was doing something really cool and really saving lives,” said Dr. Schmidt.
Their fourth sibling, John, isn’t a physician and “I honestly wonder if it’s because he never went to Take Your Daughter to Work Day!” said Dr. Butler.
Having a mother who had both a high-powered medical career and a family helped the three women know they could do the same. “It is a difficult journey, don’t get me wrong, but I never questioned that I could do it because my mom did it first,” said Dr. Hudson.
As adults, the sisters confide in one another as they navigate modern motherhood and careers, switching between discussing medical cases and parenting advice.
As hard as their mom worked while they were growing up, she didn’t have the pressure of living up to the “super mom” ideal we have now, said Dr. Butler. “Everyone wants women to work like they don’t have kids and everyone wants women to parent like they don’t have a job,” she said. Having two sisters who can provide reassurance and advice in that area goes a long way, she said.
“I think sharing that experience of navigating motherhood, a medical career, and marriage, and adult life with sisters who are going through all the same things is really special and I feel really fortunate for that,” said Dr. Schmidt.
*This story was updated on 3/8/2022.
Six female doctors from two families share their journeys through medicine.
Six female doctors from two families share their journeys through medicine.
When Annie Uhing, MD, is stressed about work, she can call her mom. She and her mom are close, yes, but her mom is also a physician and understands the ups and downs of medical education and the unique challenges of being a woman in medicine.
“My mom and I were talking about this the other day – I don’t think we know any other mother-daughter pairs of doctors,” said Dr. Uhing.
In the United States, the number of female physicians has risen steadily since the mid- and late-20th century. As of 2019, women made up more than half of medical school classes across the country and 36.3% of the physician workforce.
Still, most female physicians are concentrated in a handful of specialties (such as pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology) while the percentages of women in other areas remains extremely low (urology and orthopedic surgery). Many female physicians share anecdotal stories about not being taken seriously, like when a patient mistook them for a nurse, or preferred the advice of a male colleague to their own.
To celebrate International Women’s Day, this news organization talked to two families of female doctors about their experiences in medicine and how they inspire and support one another inside and outside the hospital.
Deborah, Charlene, and Annie
When Deborah Gaebler-Spira, MD, started medical school at the University of Illinois in 1975, women made up just 15% of her class. “For me, the idea that as a woman you could have a vocation that could be quite meaningful and self-directed – that was very important,” said Dr. Gaebler-Spira, now a pediatric rehabilitation physician at the Shirley Ryan Ability Lab and professor at Northwestern University in Chicago.
She blocked out a lot of discouragement along the way. In undergrad, the dean of the college warned Dr. Gaebler-Spira she’d never make it as a doctor. In medical school interviews, administrators could be hostile. “There was this feeling that you were taking a place of someone who really deserved it,” she said. When selecting a residency, Dr. Gaebler-Spira decided against a career in obstetrics because of the overt misogyny in the field at the time.
Instead, she went into pediatrics and physical medicine and rehabilitation, eventually working to become an expert in cerebral palsy. Along the way, Dr. Gaebler-Spira made lifelong friends with other female physicians and found strong female mentors, including Billie Adams, MD, and Helen Emery, MD.
When her sister, Charlene Gaebler-Uhing, MD, also decided to go into medicine, Dr. Gaebler-Spira said she “thought it was a sign of sanity as she was always much more competitive than I was! And if I could do it, no question she was able!”
Dr. Gaebler-Uhing, now an adolescent medicine specialist at Children’s Wisconsin in Milwaukee, followed her older sister’s footsteps to medical school in 1983, after first considering a career in social work.
While there were now more women going into medicine – her medical school class was about 25% women – problems persisted. During clinical rotations in residency, Dr. Gaebler-Uhing was often the only woman on a team and made the conscious decision to go professionally by her nickname, Charlie. “If a woman’s name was on the consult, her opinion and insights did not get the same value or respect as a male physician’s,” she said. “The only way they knew I was a woman was if they really knew me.”
The Gaebler sisters leaned on each other professionally and personally throughout their careers. When both sisters practiced in Chicago, they referred patients to one another. And Dr. Gaebler-Uhing said her older sister was a great role model for how to balance the dual roles of physician and parent, as few of the older female doctors who trained her were married or had a child.
Now Dr. Gaebler-Uhing’s daughter, Annie Uhing, MD, is entering medicine herself. She is currently pediatric resident at the University of Wisconsin American Family Hospital. She plans to do a chief year and then a pediatric endocrinology fellowship.
Growing up, Dr. Uhing wasn’t always sure she wanted to work as much as her parents, who are both doctors. But her mom provided a great example few of her friends had at home: “If you want to work, you should work and do what you want to do and it’s not wrong to want to have a really high-powered job as a woman,” said Dr. Uhing.
Kathryn, Susan, and Rita
The three sisters Kathryn Hudson, MD, Susan Schmidt, MD, and Rita Butler, MD, were inspired to go into medicine by their mother, Rita Watson, MD, who was one of the first female interventional cardiologists in the United States.
“I think we had a front row seat to what being a doctor was like,” said Dr. Hudson, a hematologist and oncologist and director of survivorship at Texas Oncology in Austin. Both parents were MDs – their dad was a pharmaceutical researcher at Merck – and they would excitedly discuss patient cases and drug development at the dinner table, said Dr. Butler, an interventional cardiology fellow at the Lankenau Heart Institute in Wynnewood, Pa.
All three sisters have vivid memories of ‘Take Your Daughter to Work Day’ at their mom’s hospital. “I remember going to Take Your Daughter to Work Day with her and watching her in action and thinking, oh my gosh, my mom is so cool and I want to be like her,” said Dr. Schmidt, a pediatric critical care specialist at St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children in Philadelphia. “I’ve always felt special that my mom was doing something really cool and really saving lives,” said Dr. Schmidt.
Their fourth sibling, John, isn’t a physician and “I honestly wonder if it’s because he never went to Take Your Daughter to Work Day!” said Dr. Butler.
Having a mother who had both a high-powered medical career and a family helped the three women know they could do the same. “It is a difficult journey, don’t get me wrong, but I never questioned that I could do it because my mom did it first,” said Dr. Hudson.
As adults, the sisters confide in one another as they navigate modern motherhood and careers, switching between discussing medical cases and parenting advice.
As hard as their mom worked while they were growing up, she didn’t have the pressure of living up to the “super mom” ideal we have now, said Dr. Butler. “Everyone wants women to work like they don’t have kids and everyone wants women to parent like they don’t have a job,” she said. Having two sisters who can provide reassurance and advice in that area goes a long way, she said.
“I think sharing that experience of navigating motherhood, a medical career, and marriage, and adult life with sisters who are going through all the same things is really special and I feel really fortunate for that,” said Dr. Schmidt.
*This story was updated on 3/8/2022.
When Annie Uhing, MD, is stressed about work, she can call her mom. She and her mom are close, yes, but her mom is also a physician and understands the ups and downs of medical education and the unique challenges of being a woman in medicine.
“My mom and I were talking about this the other day – I don’t think we know any other mother-daughter pairs of doctors,” said Dr. Uhing.
In the United States, the number of female physicians has risen steadily since the mid- and late-20th century. As of 2019, women made up more than half of medical school classes across the country and 36.3% of the physician workforce.
Still, most female physicians are concentrated in a handful of specialties (such as pediatrics and obstetrics and gynecology) while the percentages of women in other areas remains extremely low (urology and orthopedic surgery). Many female physicians share anecdotal stories about not being taken seriously, like when a patient mistook them for a nurse, or preferred the advice of a male colleague to their own.
To celebrate International Women’s Day, this news organization talked to two families of female doctors about their experiences in medicine and how they inspire and support one another inside and outside the hospital.
Deborah, Charlene, and Annie
When Deborah Gaebler-Spira, MD, started medical school at the University of Illinois in 1975, women made up just 15% of her class. “For me, the idea that as a woman you could have a vocation that could be quite meaningful and self-directed – that was very important,” said Dr. Gaebler-Spira, now a pediatric rehabilitation physician at the Shirley Ryan Ability Lab and professor at Northwestern University in Chicago.
She blocked out a lot of discouragement along the way. In undergrad, the dean of the college warned Dr. Gaebler-Spira she’d never make it as a doctor. In medical school interviews, administrators could be hostile. “There was this feeling that you were taking a place of someone who really deserved it,” she said. When selecting a residency, Dr. Gaebler-Spira decided against a career in obstetrics because of the overt misogyny in the field at the time.
Instead, she went into pediatrics and physical medicine and rehabilitation, eventually working to become an expert in cerebral palsy. Along the way, Dr. Gaebler-Spira made lifelong friends with other female physicians and found strong female mentors, including Billie Adams, MD, and Helen Emery, MD.
When her sister, Charlene Gaebler-Uhing, MD, also decided to go into medicine, Dr. Gaebler-Spira said she “thought it was a sign of sanity as she was always much more competitive than I was! And if I could do it, no question she was able!”
Dr. Gaebler-Uhing, now an adolescent medicine specialist at Children’s Wisconsin in Milwaukee, followed her older sister’s footsteps to medical school in 1983, after first considering a career in social work.
While there were now more women going into medicine – her medical school class was about 25% women – problems persisted. During clinical rotations in residency, Dr. Gaebler-Uhing was often the only woman on a team and made the conscious decision to go professionally by her nickname, Charlie. “If a woman’s name was on the consult, her opinion and insights did not get the same value or respect as a male physician’s,” she said. “The only way they knew I was a woman was if they really knew me.”
The Gaebler sisters leaned on each other professionally and personally throughout their careers. When both sisters practiced in Chicago, they referred patients to one another. And Dr. Gaebler-Uhing said her older sister was a great role model for how to balance the dual roles of physician and parent, as few of the older female doctors who trained her were married or had a child.
Now Dr. Gaebler-Uhing’s daughter, Annie Uhing, MD, is entering medicine herself. She is currently pediatric resident at the University of Wisconsin American Family Hospital. She plans to do a chief year and then a pediatric endocrinology fellowship.
Growing up, Dr. Uhing wasn’t always sure she wanted to work as much as her parents, who are both doctors. But her mom provided a great example few of her friends had at home: “If you want to work, you should work and do what you want to do and it’s not wrong to want to have a really high-powered job as a woman,” said Dr. Uhing.
Kathryn, Susan, and Rita
The three sisters Kathryn Hudson, MD, Susan Schmidt, MD, and Rita Butler, MD, were inspired to go into medicine by their mother, Rita Watson, MD, who was one of the first female interventional cardiologists in the United States.
“I think we had a front row seat to what being a doctor was like,” said Dr. Hudson, a hematologist and oncologist and director of survivorship at Texas Oncology in Austin. Both parents were MDs – their dad was a pharmaceutical researcher at Merck – and they would excitedly discuss patient cases and drug development at the dinner table, said Dr. Butler, an interventional cardiology fellow at the Lankenau Heart Institute in Wynnewood, Pa.
All three sisters have vivid memories of ‘Take Your Daughter to Work Day’ at their mom’s hospital. “I remember going to Take Your Daughter to Work Day with her and watching her in action and thinking, oh my gosh, my mom is so cool and I want to be like her,” said Dr. Schmidt, a pediatric critical care specialist at St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children in Philadelphia. “I’ve always felt special that my mom was doing something really cool and really saving lives,” said Dr. Schmidt.
Their fourth sibling, John, isn’t a physician and “I honestly wonder if it’s because he never went to Take Your Daughter to Work Day!” said Dr. Butler.
Having a mother who had both a high-powered medical career and a family helped the three women know they could do the same. “It is a difficult journey, don’t get me wrong, but I never questioned that I could do it because my mom did it first,” said Dr. Hudson.
As adults, the sisters confide in one another as they navigate modern motherhood and careers, switching between discussing medical cases and parenting advice.
As hard as their mom worked while they were growing up, she didn’t have the pressure of living up to the “super mom” ideal we have now, said Dr. Butler. “Everyone wants women to work like they don’t have kids and everyone wants women to parent like they don’t have a job,” she said. Having two sisters who can provide reassurance and advice in that area goes a long way, she said.
“I think sharing that experience of navigating motherhood, a medical career, and marriage, and adult life with sisters who are going through all the same things is really special and I feel really fortunate for that,” said Dr. Schmidt.
*This story was updated on 3/8/2022.
Commentary: Nirsevimab protects healthy infants from RSV
Imagine a time when RSV doesn’t rage through the community each year. That time would result from decades of research that uncovered RSV’s secrets and explained the only partly successful initial vaccines and prophylactic interventions (for example, palivizumab).
Key discovery: The original RSV antigen target, RSV’s fusion (F) protein, is suboptimal despite having been associated with RSV attachment to and breaching of host cell membranes.
Some amazing work showed that having antibodies block the F-protein was like putting up a shield to protect against an arrow only after the arrow had already struck its target. Indeed, the F-protein evolves only after the attachment/breach. The preattachment/breach version (prefusion protein) sits on the virus surface and is like a loaded bow with an arrow in place. The prefusion protein changes configuration when RSV contacts host cells to uncoil and release the “arrow,” creating the entry point for RSV nucleic acids.
Nirsevimab was created to glom onto the prefusion protein and prevent it from uncoiling/releasing its “arrow,” the critical event in RSV infecting a cell. So, it is not surprising that it works better than palivizumab, which targets the fusion protein.
The prefusion protein is also the target of newer vaccine candidates, including one that showed 87% efficacy against RSV challenge in adults (think of mother getting this vaccine and endowing newborns with antiprefusion antibodies; N Engl J Med. 2022;386:2377-86).
The time when RSV is not an annual scourge is closer than ever.
Christopher J. Harrison, MD, is professor, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, department of medicine, infectious diseases section, Kansas City. He has no financial conflicts of interest.
Imagine a time when RSV doesn’t rage through the community each year. That time would result from decades of research that uncovered RSV’s secrets and explained the only partly successful initial vaccines and prophylactic interventions (for example, palivizumab).
Key discovery: The original RSV antigen target, RSV’s fusion (F) protein, is suboptimal despite having been associated with RSV attachment to and breaching of host cell membranes.
Some amazing work showed that having antibodies block the F-protein was like putting up a shield to protect against an arrow only after the arrow had already struck its target. Indeed, the F-protein evolves only after the attachment/breach. The preattachment/breach version (prefusion protein) sits on the virus surface and is like a loaded bow with an arrow in place. The prefusion protein changes configuration when RSV contacts host cells to uncoil and release the “arrow,” creating the entry point for RSV nucleic acids.
Nirsevimab was created to glom onto the prefusion protein and prevent it from uncoiling/releasing its “arrow,” the critical event in RSV infecting a cell. So, it is not surprising that it works better than palivizumab, which targets the fusion protein.
The prefusion protein is also the target of newer vaccine candidates, including one that showed 87% efficacy against RSV challenge in adults (think of mother getting this vaccine and endowing newborns with antiprefusion antibodies; N Engl J Med. 2022;386:2377-86).
The time when RSV is not an annual scourge is closer than ever.
Christopher J. Harrison, MD, is professor, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, department of medicine, infectious diseases section, Kansas City. He has no financial conflicts of interest.
Imagine a time when RSV doesn’t rage through the community each year. That time would result from decades of research that uncovered RSV’s secrets and explained the only partly successful initial vaccines and prophylactic interventions (for example, palivizumab).
Key discovery: The original RSV antigen target, RSV’s fusion (F) protein, is suboptimal despite having been associated with RSV attachment to and breaching of host cell membranes.
Some amazing work showed that having antibodies block the F-protein was like putting up a shield to protect against an arrow only after the arrow had already struck its target. Indeed, the F-protein evolves only after the attachment/breach. The preattachment/breach version (prefusion protein) sits on the virus surface and is like a loaded bow with an arrow in place. The prefusion protein changes configuration when RSV contacts host cells to uncoil and release the “arrow,” creating the entry point for RSV nucleic acids.
Nirsevimab was created to glom onto the prefusion protein and prevent it from uncoiling/releasing its “arrow,” the critical event in RSV infecting a cell. So, it is not surprising that it works better than palivizumab, which targets the fusion protein.
The prefusion protein is also the target of newer vaccine candidates, including one that showed 87% efficacy against RSV challenge in adults (think of mother getting this vaccine and endowing newborns with antiprefusion antibodies; N Engl J Med. 2022;386:2377-86).
The time when RSV is not an annual scourge is closer than ever.
Christopher J. Harrison, MD, is professor, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, department of medicine, infectious diseases section, Kansas City. He has no financial conflicts of interest.
‘Robust’ increase in tics during the pandemic explained?
The findings should help answer questions surrounding a recent increase in tic disorders, lead author Jessica Frey, MD, a movement disorders fellow at the University of Florida, Gainesville, told this news organization.
“We’re trying to learn why there are new-onset explosive tic disorders [or] functional tic disorders, and to find ways to educate patients, parents, and the general public about what Tourette syndrome looks like – and how we can help patients have a better quality of life,” Dr. Frey said.
The findings will be presented at the American Academy of Neurology 2022 annual meeting in April.
‘Robust’ increase
A neurologic disorder that causes sudden repetitive involuntary muscle movements and sounds, Tourette syndrome typically develops in childhood, worsens in adolescence, and improves or completely disappears in adulthood, Dr. Frey noted.
The condition is often negatively portrayed in films, showing people using obscene gestures or vulgar language, she said. Although social media can be an “empowering tool” for tic sufferers, it is unregulated and can be a vehicle for “false information,” she added.
Dr. Frey noted that during the pandemic there has been a “robust” increase in use by teens of social media, particularly TikTok. At the same time, there have been reports of teen girls experiencing “explosive tic onset” that mimics videos from TikTok influencers.
The new analysis included 20 teens with a tic disorder, ranging in age from 11 to 21 years (average age, 16 years). About 45% of participants identified as male, 45% as female, and 10% as nonbinary.
The nature of the tic disorder varied widely among participants. Some had experienced tics for many years, while others only developed tics during the pandemic.
Participants completed a detailed survey, part of which inquired about where they received information about tics, such as from a doctor, media, parents, or teachers.
They were also asked to rank various social media platforms, including Tik Tok, Facebook, and YouTube on a five-point Likert scale as an information source about tics.
In addition, the survey inquired about tic severity and frequency, quality of life, and whether the pandemic or social media affected respondents’ tics.
Worsens quality of life
Results showed 65% of respondents used social media at least four to five times per day for an average of 5.6 hours per day. Approximately 90% reported increased use of social media during COVID.
Only 5% of participants reported using social media to provide information about tics.
About half of respondents indicated social media adversely affected their tics, and 85% said their tic frequency worsened during COVID.
Dr. Frey noted that because teens had to attend school virtually, that may have led to increased hours spent online.
There was no significant correlation between social media use and self-reported frequency of tics since the onset of COVID (Pearson correlation coefficient [R], –0.0055, P = .982).
However, there was a statistically significant correlation between social media use and tic severity (R, –0.496, P = .026) and quality of life (R, –0.447, P = .048).
These results suggest teenagers did not develop more tics, but rather the tics they already had worsened and affected their quality of life, Dr. Frey noted. She added that teens sometimes injure themselves while experiencing tics.
The full study has now enrolled 50 participants, and investigators anticipate that number to go up to 80. “We’re hoping to see more patterns emerge when we have a larger cohort of data available,” said Dr. Frey.
Asking parents to weigh in on the impact of social media on their child’s tic condition would be “a great idea for a follow-up study,” she added.
Symptoms exacerbated
Commenting on the findings, Tamara Pringsheim, MD, professor in the department of clinical neurosciences, psychiatry, pediatrics, and community health sciences at the University of Calgary (Alta.), said she also has noticed the impact of increased social media use on young patients with tics during the pandemic.
“Many young people report that seeing other people with tics, or ticlike behaviors, can exacerbate their own symptoms,” said Dr. Pringsheim, who is the university’s program lead on Tourette and pediatric movement disorders.
She noted a principle of the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics, which is a nonpharmacologic technique demonstrated to reduce tic severity, is to identify antecedents or triggers for tics, and to learn to manage them. It might be a good idea to remind young patients of this principle, said Dr. Pringsheim, who was not associated with the current research.
“I suggest to young people who report specific social media content as a trigger for symptoms to recognize the effect of the exposure on their symptoms and make an informed choice about what they view and how much time they spend on social media,” she added.
The study did not receive any outside funding support. Dr. Frey has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The findings should help answer questions surrounding a recent increase in tic disorders, lead author Jessica Frey, MD, a movement disorders fellow at the University of Florida, Gainesville, told this news organization.
“We’re trying to learn why there are new-onset explosive tic disorders [or] functional tic disorders, and to find ways to educate patients, parents, and the general public about what Tourette syndrome looks like – and how we can help patients have a better quality of life,” Dr. Frey said.
The findings will be presented at the American Academy of Neurology 2022 annual meeting in April.
‘Robust’ increase
A neurologic disorder that causes sudden repetitive involuntary muscle movements and sounds, Tourette syndrome typically develops in childhood, worsens in adolescence, and improves or completely disappears in adulthood, Dr. Frey noted.
The condition is often negatively portrayed in films, showing people using obscene gestures or vulgar language, she said. Although social media can be an “empowering tool” for tic sufferers, it is unregulated and can be a vehicle for “false information,” she added.
Dr. Frey noted that during the pandemic there has been a “robust” increase in use by teens of social media, particularly TikTok. At the same time, there have been reports of teen girls experiencing “explosive tic onset” that mimics videos from TikTok influencers.
The new analysis included 20 teens with a tic disorder, ranging in age from 11 to 21 years (average age, 16 years). About 45% of participants identified as male, 45% as female, and 10% as nonbinary.
The nature of the tic disorder varied widely among participants. Some had experienced tics for many years, while others only developed tics during the pandemic.
Participants completed a detailed survey, part of which inquired about where they received information about tics, such as from a doctor, media, parents, or teachers.
They were also asked to rank various social media platforms, including Tik Tok, Facebook, and YouTube on a five-point Likert scale as an information source about tics.
In addition, the survey inquired about tic severity and frequency, quality of life, and whether the pandemic or social media affected respondents’ tics.
Worsens quality of life
Results showed 65% of respondents used social media at least four to five times per day for an average of 5.6 hours per day. Approximately 90% reported increased use of social media during COVID.
Only 5% of participants reported using social media to provide information about tics.
About half of respondents indicated social media adversely affected their tics, and 85% said their tic frequency worsened during COVID.
Dr. Frey noted that because teens had to attend school virtually, that may have led to increased hours spent online.
There was no significant correlation between social media use and self-reported frequency of tics since the onset of COVID (Pearson correlation coefficient [R], –0.0055, P = .982).
However, there was a statistically significant correlation between social media use and tic severity (R, –0.496, P = .026) and quality of life (R, –0.447, P = .048).
These results suggest teenagers did not develop more tics, but rather the tics they already had worsened and affected their quality of life, Dr. Frey noted. She added that teens sometimes injure themselves while experiencing tics.
The full study has now enrolled 50 participants, and investigators anticipate that number to go up to 80. “We’re hoping to see more patterns emerge when we have a larger cohort of data available,” said Dr. Frey.
Asking parents to weigh in on the impact of social media on their child’s tic condition would be “a great idea for a follow-up study,” she added.
Symptoms exacerbated
Commenting on the findings, Tamara Pringsheim, MD, professor in the department of clinical neurosciences, psychiatry, pediatrics, and community health sciences at the University of Calgary (Alta.), said she also has noticed the impact of increased social media use on young patients with tics during the pandemic.
“Many young people report that seeing other people with tics, or ticlike behaviors, can exacerbate their own symptoms,” said Dr. Pringsheim, who is the university’s program lead on Tourette and pediatric movement disorders.
She noted a principle of the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics, which is a nonpharmacologic technique demonstrated to reduce tic severity, is to identify antecedents or triggers for tics, and to learn to manage them. It might be a good idea to remind young patients of this principle, said Dr. Pringsheim, who was not associated with the current research.
“I suggest to young people who report specific social media content as a trigger for symptoms to recognize the effect of the exposure on their symptoms and make an informed choice about what they view and how much time they spend on social media,” she added.
The study did not receive any outside funding support. Dr. Frey has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
The findings should help answer questions surrounding a recent increase in tic disorders, lead author Jessica Frey, MD, a movement disorders fellow at the University of Florida, Gainesville, told this news organization.
“We’re trying to learn why there are new-onset explosive tic disorders [or] functional tic disorders, and to find ways to educate patients, parents, and the general public about what Tourette syndrome looks like – and how we can help patients have a better quality of life,” Dr. Frey said.
The findings will be presented at the American Academy of Neurology 2022 annual meeting in April.
‘Robust’ increase
A neurologic disorder that causes sudden repetitive involuntary muscle movements and sounds, Tourette syndrome typically develops in childhood, worsens in adolescence, and improves or completely disappears in adulthood, Dr. Frey noted.
The condition is often negatively portrayed in films, showing people using obscene gestures or vulgar language, she said. Although social media can be an “empowering tool” for tic sufferers, it is unregulated and can be a vehicle for “false information,” she added.
Dr. Frey noted that during the pandemic there has been a “robust” increase in use by teens of social media, particularly TikTok. At the same time, there have been reports of teen girls experiencing “explosive tic onset” that mimics videos from TikTok influencers.
The new analysis included 20 teens with a tic disorder, ranging in age from 11 to 21 years (average age, 16 years). About 45% of participants identified as male, 45% as female, and 10% as nonbinary.
The nature of the tic disorder varied widely among participants. Some had experienced tics for many years, while others only developed tics during the pandemic.
Participants completed a detailed survey, part of which inquired about where they received information about tics, such as from a doctor, media, parents, or teachers.
They were also asked to rank various social media platforms, including Tik Tok, Facebook, and YouTube on a five-point Likert scale as an information source about tics.
In addition, the survey inquired about tic severity and frequency, quality of life, and whether the pandemic or social media affected respondents’ tics.
Worsens quality of life
Results showed 65% of respondents used social media at least four to five times per day for an average of 5.6 hours per day. Approximately 90% reported increased use of social media during COVID.
Only 5% of participants reported using social media to provide information about tics.
About half of respondents indicated social media adversely affected their tics, and 85% said their tic frequency worsened during COVID.
Dr. Frey noted that because teens had to attend school virtually, that may have led to increased hours spent online.
There was no significant correlation between social media use and self-reported frequency of tics since the onset of COVID (Pearson correlation coefficient [R], –0.0055, P = .982).
However, there was a statistically significant correlation between social media use and tic severity (R, –0.496, P = .026) and quality of life (R, –0.447, P = .048).
These results suggest teenagers did not develop more tics, but rather the tics they already had worsened and affected their quality of life, Dr. Frey noted. She added that teens sometimes injure themselves while experiencing tics.
The full study has now enrolled 50 participants, and investigators anticipate that number to go up to 80. “We’re hoping to see more patterns emerge when we have a larger cohort of data available,” said Dr. Frey.
Asking parents to weigh in on the impact of social media on their child’s tic condition would be “a great idea for a follow-up study,” she added.
Symptoms exacerbated
Commenting on the findings, Tamara Pringsheim, MD, professor in the department of clinical neurosciences, psychiatry, pediatrics, and community health sciences at the University of Calgary (Alta.), said she also has noticed the impact of increased social media use on young patients with tics during the pandemic.
“Many young people report that seeing other people with tics, or ticlike behaviors, can exacerbate their own symptoms,” said Dr. Pringsheim, who is the university’s program lead on Tourette and pediatric movement disorders.
She noted a principle of the Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics, which is a nonpharmacologic technique demonstrated to reduce tic severity, is to identify antecedents or triggers for tics, and to learn to manage them. It might be a good idea to remind young patients of this principle, said Dr. Pringsheim, who was not associated with the current research.
“I suggest to young people who report specific social media content as a trigger for symptoms to recognize the effect of the exposure on their symptoms and make an informed choice about what they view and how much time they spend on social media,” she added.
The study did not receive any outside funding support. Dr. Frey has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.
Honoring Dr. Paul Farmer: Dr. Serena Koenig shares her memories of working with him
Infectious disease specialist and humanitarian, Paul Edward Farmer, MD, PhD, who cofounded Partners In Health, died suddenly on Feb. 21. To celebrate his life, this news organization interviewed Serena Koenig, MD, MPH, who met Dr. Farmer when she was an internal medicine resident at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Koenig had worked closely with Dr. Farmer ever since they met.
Q. Can you please share one of your best memories of Dr. Farmer?
Dr. Serena Koenig: Partners IN Health (PIH) had started the HIV Equity Initiative, which was one of the first programs in the world to provide free, comprehensive treatment for HIV. This was at the time when millions of people in Africa were dying of HIV and many experts said it was not feasible to treat HIV in a poor country, because it was too complicated and expensive. Paul took me on some home visits with patients who had what he called the Lazarus effect, coming back from death’s door from advanced AIDS to vigorous health on antiretroviral therapy. I had just started working in Haiti with Paul and PIH, and I felt the enormous magnitude of what he was doing.
Paul and some other incredible colleagues atQ. What aspects of him and his work do you find most admirable?
Dr. Koenig: I most admired Paul’s humanity, his belief that every person matters and has the right to high-quality health care, and his vision of global health equity.
He said: “The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that is wrong with the world.” Paul lived this philosophy. He has spoken extensively about harms of socialization for scarcity on behalf of those who are poor, leading policy makers to decisions regarding the feasibility of treating some diseases, but not others.
He said in an interview with the Harvard Gazette in 2018: “The most compelling thing to fight socialization for scarcity on behalf of others is health system strengthening. Health systems that integrate prevention and quality care.”
A few weeks ago, I asked him his thoughts about the high-level resources we have invested in some patients who have needed specialty care over the years, and he said: “No way that we should waste all of our emotional energy responding only to those constant, nagging critics that it’s not cost effective, not feasible, not sustainable, not even prudent. Because you know what they would have done if it was their child or family member.”
Q. When did you first meet Dr. Farmer, and what inspired you to work with him?
Dr. Koenig: When I was an internal medicine resident at the Brigham, Paul and I bonded over the care of one of my clinic patients who I followed very closely, and who was admitted to his inpatient service.
Like everyone else who has worked with Paul, I was touched by his kindness and warmth.
A couple of years later, he asked me to help him raise money to bring a young man named Wilnot from Haiti to the Brigham for an aortic valve replacement. After we raised the money, he asked me to go to Haiti to help Wilnot get his medical visa and to escort him to Boston.
That short trip to Haiti had an enormous impact on my life. I was shattered to see the poverty that the people of Haiti were enduring – and in a country a short plane flight from Miami.
Shortly after this, Paul asked me to help him find treatment for another patient, a young boy named John, who presented with neck masses that were later diagnosed as nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
It took us some time to make the diagnosis and then to arrange free care at Mass General.
When I returned to Haiti with two PIH colleagues to help John get a visa and escort him back to Boston, we found that John’s condition was much worse. We ended up medically evacuating him to Boston, because he was too sick for a commercial flight.
Tracy Kidder wrote about this heartbreaking experience in the book “Mountains Beyond Mountains.”
Throughout all of these experiences, I was deeply impressed with Paul’s commitment to do whatever it took to provide the best care for patients, as if they were members of his own family. He said “Tout Moun Se Moun” (Haitian Creole for “every person is a person”), and I could tell that he meant it.
Q. How did you collaborate with him professionally?
Dr. Koenig: I spent the first few years after residency working with Paul and Partners In Health. Initially, I served as a liaison between PIH in Haiti and the Brigham, bringing several more patients to Boston for care, and arranging specialty surgical trips to Haiti.
Later, when HIV funding became available from the Global Fund for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, I moved to rural Haiti to provide treatment for patients with HIV and/or TB at one of the first PIH expansion sites. We treated many patients with advanced stages of HIV and/or TB, and many of them recovered remarkably quickly with antiretroviral therapy.
When I returned to Boston to complete an infectious disease fellowship I switched my focus to conducting clinical research to improve HIV and TB treatment outcomes. Paul emailed his mentor and friend, Jean “Bill” Pape, the director of a Haitian NGO called GHESKIO (Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections), which is an internationally celebrated center of excellence in HIV-related research and clinical care, to ask if I could collaborate with them.
Ever since that time, I have been based between the Brigham’s division of global health equity, which was led by Paul, and GHESKIO.
Paul was very supportive of our research, which aims to improve health service delivery and treatment regimens for HIV and TB.
Q. What lessons do you think other physicians can learn from him?
Dr. Koenig: As Joia Mukherjee, chief medical officer of Partners In Health, has said, Paul left us a roadmap. He wrote many books, and he was very eloquent in expressing his philosophy about equity and justice in numerous interviews. This is relevant not only for international sites, but in the United States as well, with our major disparities in health outcomes by race, geography, and socioeconomic status.
No one will be able to replace Paul, but he left us with a vision of what is achievable.
Dr. Koenig is associate physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, with faculty appointments in the divisions of global health equity and infectious diseases. She is also associate professor at Harvard Medical School.
Infectious disease specialist and humanitarian, Paul Edward Farmer, MD, PhD, who cofounded Partners In Health, died suddenly on Feb. 21. To celebrate his life, this news organization interviewed Serena Koenig, MD, MPH, who met Dr. Farmer when she was an internal medicine resident at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Koenig had worked closely with Dr. Farmer ever since they met.
Q. Can you please share one of your best memories of Dr. Farmer?
Dr. Serena Koenig: Partners IN Health (PIH) had started the HIV Equity Initiative, which was one of the first programs in the world to provide free, comprehensive treatment for HIV. This was at the time when millions of people in Africa were dying of HIV and many experts said it was not feasible to treat HIV in a poor country, because it was too complicated and expensive. Paul took me on some home visits with patients who had what he called the Lazarus effect, coming back from death’s door from advanced AIDS to vigorous health on antiretroviral therapy. I had just started working in Haiti with Paul and PIH, and I felt the enormous magnitude of what he was doing.
Paul and some other incredible colleagues atQ. What aspects of him and his work do you find most admirable?
Dr. Koenig: I most admired Paul’s humanity, his belief that every person matters and has the right to high-quality health care, and his vision of global health equity.
He said: “The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that is wrong with the world.” Paul lived this philosophy. He has spoken extensively about harms of socialization for scarcity on behalf of those who are poor, leading policy makers to decisions regarding the feasibility of treating some diseases, but not others.
He said in an interview with the Harvard Gazette in 2018: “The most compelling thing to fight socialization for scarcity on behalf of others is health system strengthening. Health systems that integrate prevention and quality care.”
A few weeks ago, I asked him his thoughts about the high-level resources we have invested in some patients who have needed specialty care over the years, and he said: “No way that we should waste all of our emotional energy responding only to those constant, nagging critics that it’s not cost effective, not feasible, not sustainable, not even prudent. Because you know what they would have done if it was their child or family member.”
Q. When did you first meet Dr. Farmer, and what inspired you to work with him?
Dr. Koenig: When I was an internal medicine resident at the Brigham, Paul and I bonded over the care of one of my clinic patients who I followed very closely, and who was admitted to his inpatient service.
Like everyone else who has worked with Paul, I was touched by his kindness and warmth.
A couple of years later, he asked me to help him raise money to bring a young man named Wilnot from Haiti to the Brigham for an aortic valve replacement. After we raised the money, he asked me to go to Haiti to help Wilnot get his medical visa and to escort him to Boston.
That short trip to Haiti had an enormous impact on my life. I was shattered to see the poverty that the people of Haiti were enduring – and in a country a short plane flight from Miami.
Shortly after this, Paul asked me to help him find treatment for another patient, a young boy named John, who presented with neck masses that were later diagnosed as nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
It took us some time to make the diagnosis and then to arrange free care at Mass General.
When I returned to Haiti with two PIH colleagues to help John get a visa and escort him back to Boston, we found that John’s condition was much worse. We ended up medically evacuating him to Boston, because he was too sick for a commercial flight.
Tracy Kidder wrote about this heartbreaking experience in the book “Mountains Beyond Mountains.”
Throughout all of these experiences, I was deeply impressed with Paul’s commitment to do whatever it took to provide the best care for patients, as if they were members of his own family. He said “Tout Moun Se Moun” (Haitian Creole for “every person is a person”), and I could tell that he meant it.
Q. How did you collaborate with him professionally?
Dr. Koenig: I spent the first few years after residency working with Paul and Partners In Health. Initially, I served as a liaison between PIH in Haiti and the Brigham, bringing several more patients to Boston for care, and arranging specialty surgical trips to Haiti.
Later, when HIV funding became available from the Global Fund for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, I moved to rural Haiti to provide treatment for patients with HIV and/or TB at one of the first PIH expansion sites. We treated many patients with advanced stages of HIV and/or TB, and many of them recovered remarkably quickly with antiretroviral therapy.
When I returned to Boston to complete an infectious disease fellowship I switched my focus to conducting clinical research to improve HIV and TB treatment outcomes. Paul emailed his mentor and friend, Jean “Bill” Pape, the director of a Haitian NGO called GHESKIO (Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections), which is an internationally celebrated center of excellence in HIV-related research and clinical care, to ask if I could collaborate with them.
Ever since that time, I have been based between the Brigham’s division of global health equity, which was led by Paul, and GHESKIO.
Paul was very supportive of our research, which aims to improve health service delivery and treatment regimens for HIV and TB.
Q. What lessons do you think other physicians can learn from him?
Dr. Koenig: As Joia Mukherjee, chief medical officer of Partners In Health, has said, Paul left us a roadmap. He wrote many books, and he was very eloquent in expressing his philosophy about equity and justice in numerous interviews. This is relevant not only for international sites, but in the United States as well, with our major disparities in health outcomes by race, geography, and socioeconomic status.
No one will be able to replace Paul, but he left us with a vision of what is achievable.
Dr. Koenig is associate physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, with faculty appointments in the divisions of global health equity and infectious diseases. She is also associate professor at Harvard Medical School.
Infectious disease specialist and humanitarian, Paul Edward Farmer, MD, PhD, who cofounded Partners In Health, died suddenly on Feb. 21. To celebrate his life, this news organization interviewed Serena Koenig, MD, MPH, who met Dr. Farmer when she was an internal medicine resident at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. Dr. Koenig had worked closely with Dr. Farmer ever since they met.
Q. Can you please share one of your best memories of Dr. Farmer?
Dr. Serena Koenig: Partners IN Health (PIH) had started the HIV Equity Initiative, which was one of the first programs in the world to provide free, comprehensive treatment for HIV. This was at the time when millions of people in Africa were dying of HIV and many experts said it was not feasible to treat HIV in a poor country, because it was too complicated and expensive. Paul took me on some home visits with patients who had what he called the Lazarus effect, coming back from death’s door from advanced AIDS to vigorous health on antiretroviral therapy. I had just started working in Haiti with Paul and PIH, and I felt the enormous magnitude of what he was doing.
Paul and some other incredible colleagues atQ. What aspects of him and his work do you find most admirable?
Dr. Koenig: I most admired Paul’s humanity, his belief that every person matters and has the right to high-quality health care, and his vision of global health equity.
He said: “The idea that some lives matter less is the root of all that is wrong with the world.” Paul lived this philosophy. He has spoken extensively about harms of socialization for scarcity on behalf of those who are poor, leading policy makers to decisions regarding the feasibility of treating some diseases, but not others.
He said in an interview with the Harvard Gazette in 2018: “The most compelling thing to fight socialization for scarcity on behalf of others is health system strengthening. Health systems that integrate prevention and quality care.”
A few weeks ago, I asked him his thoughts about the high-level resources we have invested in some patients who have needed specialty care over the years, and he said: “No way that we should waste all of our emotional energy responding only to those constant, nagging critics that it’s not cost effective, not feasible, not sustainable, not even prudent. Because you know what they would have done if it was their child or family member.”
Q. When did you first meet Dr. Farmer, and what inspired you to work with him?
Dr. Koenig: When I was an internal medicine resident at the Brigham, Paul and I bonded over the care of one of my clinic patients who I followed very closely, and who was admitted to his inpatient service.
Like everyone else who has worked with Paul, I was touched by his kindness and warmth.
A couple of years later, he asked me to help him raise money to bring a young man named Wilnot from Haiti to the Brigham for an aortic valve replacement. After we raised the money, he asked me to go to Haiti to help Wilnot get his medical visa and to escort him to Boston.
That short trip to Haiti had an enormous impact on my life. I was shattered to see the poverty that the people of Haiti were enduring – and in a country a short plane flight from Miami.
Shortly after this, Paul asked me to help him find treatment for another patient, a young boy named John, who presented with neck masses that were later diagnosed as nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
It took us some time to make the diagnosis and then to arrange free care at Mass General.
When I returned to Haiti with two PIH colleagues to help John get a visa and escort him back to Boston, we found that John’s condition was much worse. We ended up medically evacuating him to Boston, because he was too sick for a commercial flight.
Tracy Kidder wrote about this heartbreaking experience in the book “Mountains Beyond Mountains.”
Throughout all of these experiences, I was deeply impressed with Paul’s commitment to do whatever it took to provide the best care for patients, as if they were members of his own family. He said “Tout Moun Se Moun” (Haitian Creole for “every person is a person”), and I could tell that he meant it.
Q. How did you collaborate with him professionally?
Dr. Koenig: I spent the first few years after residency working with Paul and Partners In Health. Initially, I served as a liaison between PIH in Haiti and the Brigham, bringing several more patients to Boston for care, and arranging specialty surgical trips to Haiti.
Later, when HIV funding became available from the Global Fund for HIV, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, I moved to rural Haiti to provide treatment for patients with HIV and/or TB at one of the first PIH expansion sites. We treated many patients with advanced stages of HIV and/or TB, and many of them recovered remarkably quickly with antiretroviral therapy.
When I returned to Boston to complete an infectious disease fellowship I switched my focus to conducting clinical research to improve HIV and TB treatment outcomes. Paul emailed his mentor and friend, Jean “Bill” Pape, the director of a Haitian NGO called GHESKIO (Haitian Group for the Study of Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections), which is an internationally celebrated center of excellence in HIV-related research and clinical care, to ask if I could collaborate with them.
Ever since that time, I have been based between the Brigham’s division of global health equity, which was led by Paul, and GHESKIO.
Paul was very supportive of our research, which aims to improve health service delivery and treatment regimens for HIV and TB.
Q. What lessons do you think other physicians can learn from him?
Dr. Koenig: As Joia Mukherjee, chief medical officer of Partners In Health, has said, Paul left us a roadmap. He wrote many books, and he was very eloquent in expressing his philosophy about equity and justice in numerous interviews. This is relevant not only for international sites, but in the United States as well, with our major disparities in health outcomes by race, geography, and socioeconomic status.
No one will be able to replace Paul, but he left us with a vision of what is achievable.
Dr. Koenig is associate physician, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, with faculty appointments in the divisions of global health equity and infectious diseases. She is also associate professor at Harvard Medical School.