User login
Long-Term Survival of a Patient With Late-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a significant component of those deaths.1,2 Treatments for advanced-stage NSCLC, however, are limited. Erlotinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has aided in advancing NSCLC therapy. Erlotinib has been shown to increase survival by 2 months compared with placebo in a phase 3, randomized controlled trial when used as second- or third-line therapy.3 The authors present a case of a man surviving almost 8 years with late-stage NSCLC on treatment with erlotinib at the VA West Los Angeles Medical Center (WLAMC).
Note: Page numbers differ between the print issue and digital edition.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a significant component of those deaths.1,2 Treatments for advanced-stage NSCLC, however, are limited. Erlotinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has aided in advancing NSCLC therapy. Erlotinib has been shown to increase survival by 2 months compared with placebo in a phase 3, randomized controlled trial when used as second- or third-line therapy.3 The authors present a case of a man surviving almost 8 years with late-stage NSCLC on treatment with erlotinib at the VA West Los Angeles Medical Center (WLAMC).
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a significant component of those deaths.1,2 Treatments for advanced-stage NSCLC, however, are limited. Erlotinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has aided in advancing NSCLC therapy. Erlotinib has been shown to increase survival by 2 months compared with placebo in a phase 3, randomized controlled trial when used as second- or third-line therapy.3 The authors present a case of a man surviving almost 8 years with late-stage NSCLC on treatment with erlotinib at the VA West Los Angeles Medical Center (WLAMC).
Note: Page numbers differ between the print issue and digital edition.
Note: Page numbers differ between the print issue and digital edition.
Potential therapeutic target for leukemia, other cancers
Photo by Thomas Semkow
Preclinical research indicates that a member of the Mediator protein complex plays a key role in hematopoiesis.
Investigators found that MED12 was required for the survival of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs).
The team said this finding, along with the fact that MED12 mutations have been linked to leukemia and solid tumor malignancies, suggests that targeting MED12 hyperactivity might be a useful strategy for treating cancers.
“Because MED12 appears to be so essential to hematopoiesis, our study points to it as a possible target for future anticancer therapies for both chronic and acute forms of leukemia,” said Iannis Aifantis, PhD, of NYU Langone Medical Center in New York.
“Our study also suggests that MED12 hyperactivation or loss of control is a possible explanation for what factors may trigger these cancers and other solid tumors.”
Dr Aifantis and his colleagues described their study in Cell Stem Cell.
The investigators first analyzed the effects of MED12 deletion in mice. Mice bred to lack MED12 died within 2 weeks of birth and showed evidence of aberrant hematopoiesis—namely, a “severe reduction of bone marrow and thymus cellularity.”
Adult mice that were engineered to lose expression of MED12 after the injection of an activating molecule experienced a “rapid” reduction in bone marrow cellularity, as well as reductions in spleen and thymus size. These mice also had low white blood cell and platelet counts and died within 3 weeks of MED12 deletion.
Subsequent analyses of the animals’ bone marrow showed that estimates of HSPCs in each mouse fell from nearly 150,000 to 15,000 within 4 days of injection. Within 10 days, there were no HSPCs left.
Deleting MED12 was also lethal for human HSPCs. Colonies of CD34+ cells dropped from an average of 25 per plate to 5 per plate within 10 days of MED12 deletion.
On the other hand, MED12 did not affect the survival of other cell types. For example, MED12 deletion did not impact mouse embryonic fibroblasts, embryonic stem cells, or hair follicle stem cells.
In addition, deleting members of the Mediator kinase module besides MED12—MED13, CDK8, or CYCLIN C—did not have a significant effect on HSPCs and did not kill mice. The investigators said this provides further evidence that MED12—by loss of its function alone—is essential for hematopoiesis.
The team found that MED12 deletion destabilizes P300 binding at lineage-specific enhancers, which results in H3K27Ac depletion, enhancer de-activation, and the consequent loss of hematopoietic stem cell gene expression signatures.
As a next step, the investigators plan to screen blood samples from cancer patients for signs of MED12 mutations and uncontrolled HSPC development.
The team also hopes to determine the biological mechanisms involved in MED12 hyperactivation and identify drug molecules that could block MED12 hyperactivity and serve as potential MED12 inhibitors.
Photo by Thomas Semkow
Preclinical research indicates that a member of the Mediator protein complex plays a key role in hematopoiesis.
Investigators found that MED12 was required for the survival of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs).
The team said this finding, along with the fact that MED12 mutations have been linked to leukemia and solid tumor malignancies, suggests that targeting MED12 hyperactivity might be a useful strategy for treating cancers.
“Because MED12 appears to be so essential to hematopoiesis, our study points to it as a possible target for future anticancer therapies for both chronic and acute forms of leukemia,” said Iannis Aifantis, PhD, of NYU Langone Medical Center in New York.
“Our study also suggests that MED12 hyperactivation or loss of control is a possible explanation for what factors may trigger these cancers and other solid tumors.”
Dr Aifantis and his colleagues described their study in Cell Stem Cell.
The investigators first analyzed the effects of MED12 deletion in mice. Mice bred to lack MED12 died within 2 weeks of birth and showed evidence of aberrant hematopoiesis—namely, a “severe reduction of bone marrow and thymus cellularity.”
Adult mice that were engineered to lose expression of MED12 after the injection of an activating molecule experienced a “rapid” reduction in bone marrow cellularity, as well as reductions in spleen and thymus size. These mice also had low white blood cell and platelet counts and died within 3 weeks of MED12 deletion.
Subsequent analyses of the animals’ bone marrow showed that estimates of HSPCs in each mouse fell from nearly 150,000 to 15,000 within 4 days of injection. Within 10 days, there were no HSPCs left.
Deleting MED12 was also lethal for human HSPCs. Colonies of CD34+ cells dropped from an average of 25 per plate to 5 per plate within 10 days of MED12 deletion.
On the other hand, MED12 did not affect the survival of other cell types. For example, MED12 deletion did not impact mouse embryonic fibroblasts, embryonic stem cells, or hair follicle stem cells.
In addition, deleting members of the Mediator kinase module besides MED12—MED13, CDK8, or CYCLIN C—did not have a significant effect on HSPCs and did not kill mice. The investigators said this provides further evidence that MED12—by loss of its function alone—is essential for hematopoiesis.
The team found that MED12 deletion destabilizes P300 binding at lineage-specific enhancers, which results in H3K27Ac depletion, enhancer de-activation, and the consequent loss of hematopoietic stem cell gene expression signatures.
As a next step, the investigators plan to screen blood samples from cancer patients for signs of MED12 mutations and uncontrolled HSPC development.
The team also hopes to determine the biological mechanisms involved in MED12 hyperactivation and identify drug molecules that could block MED12 hyperactivity and serve as potential MED12 inhibitors.
Photo by Thomas Semkow
Preclinical research indicates that a member of the Mediator protein complex plays a key role in hematopoiesis.
Investigators found that MED12 was required for the survival of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs).
The team said this finding, along with the fact that MED12 mutations have been linked to leukemia and solid tumor malignancies, suggests that targeting MED12 hyperactivity might be a useful strategy for treating cancers.
“Because MED12 appears to be so essential to hematopoiesis, our study points to it as a possible target for future anticancer therapies for both chronic and acute forms of leukemia,” said Iannis Aifantis, PhD, of NYU Langone Medical Center in New York.
“Our study also suggests that MED12 hyperactivation or loss of control is a possible explanation for what factors may trigger these cancers and other solid tumors.”
Dr Aifantis and his colleagues described their study in Cell Stem Cell.
The investigators first analyzed the effects of MED12 deletion in mice. Mice bred to lack MED12 died within 2 weeks of birth and showed evidence of aberrant hematopoiesis—namely, a “severe reduction of bone marrow and thymus cellularity.”
Adult mice that were engineered to lose expression of MED12 after the injection of an activating molecule experienced a “rapid” reduction in bone marrow cellularity, as well as reductions in spleen and thymus size. These mice also had low white blood cell and platelet counts and died within 3 weeks of MED12 deletion.
Subsequent analyses of the animals’ bone marrow showed that estimates of HSPCs in each mouse fell from nearly 150,000 to 15,000 within 4 days of injection. Within 10 days, there were no HSPCs left.
Deleting MED12 was also lethal for human HSPCs. Colonies of CD34+ cells dropped from an average of 25 per plate to 5 per plate within 10 days of MED12 deletion.
On the other hand, MED12 did not affect the survival of other cell types. For example, MED12 deletion did not impact mouse embryonic fibroblasts, embryonic stem cells, or hair follicle stem cells.
In addition, deleting members of the Mediator kinase module besides MED12—MED13, CDK8, or CYCLIN C—did not have a significant effect on HSPCs and did not kill mice. The investigators said this provides further evidence that MED12—by loss of its function alone—is essential for hematopoiesis.
The team found that MED12 deletion destabilizes P300 binding at lineage-specific enhancers, which results in H3K27Ac depletion, enhancer de-activation, and the consequent loss of hematopoietic stem cell gene expression signatures.
As a next step, the investigators plan to screen blood samples from cancer patients for signs of MED12 mutations and uncontrolled HSPC development.
The team also hopes to determine the biological mechanisms involved in MED12 hyperactivation and identify drug molecules that could block MED12 hyperactivity and serve as potential MED12 inhibitors.
NICE approves bosutinib for routine NHS use
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a final guidance recommending that bosutinib (Bosulif), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat certain patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), be made available through the National Health Service (NHS).
This means patients will no longer have to apply to the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) to obtain bosutinib.
The CDF is money the government sets aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by NICE and aren’t available within the NHS in England.
Following the decision to reform the CDF earlier this year, NICE began to reappraise all drugs currently in the CDF in April. Bosutinib is the first drug to be looked at through this reconsideration process.
NICE previously considered making bosutinib available through the NHS in 2013 but decided the drug was not cost-effective. So bosutinib was made available to patients via the CDF.
As part of the reappraisal process, Pfizer offered a discount for bosutinib. Taking this discount into consideration, as well as the limited treatment options for CML patients, NICE decided bosutinib is cost-effective.
Bosutinib has conditional approval from the European Commission to treat adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, but only if those patients have previously received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are not considered eligible for treatment with imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a final guidance recommending that bosutinib (Bosulif), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat certain patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), be made available through the National Health Service (NHS).
This means patients will no longer have to apply to the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) to obtain bosutinib.
The CDF is money the government sets aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by NICE and aren’t available within the NHS in England.
Following the decision to reform the CDF earlier this year, NICE began to reappraise all drugs currently in the CDF in April. Bosutinib is the first drug to be looked at through this reconsideration process.
NICE previously considered making bosutinib available through the NHS in 2013 but decided the drug was not cost-effective. So bosutinib was made available to patients via the CDF.
As part of the reappraisal process, Pfizer offered a discount for bosutinib. Taking this discount into consideration, as well as the limited treatment options for CML patients, NICE decided bosutinib is cost-effective.
Bosutinib has conditional approval from the European Commission to treat adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, but only if those patients have previously received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are not considered eligible for treatment with imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has issued a final guidance recommending that bosutinib (Bosulif), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat certain patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), be made available through the National Health Service (NHS).
This means patients will no longer have to apply to the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) to obtain bosutinib.
The CDF is money the government sets aside to pay for cancer drugs that haven’t been approved by NICE and aren’t available within the NHS in England.
Following the decision to reform the CDF earlier this year, NICE began to reappraise all drugs currently in the CDF in April. Bosutinib is the first drug to be looked at through this reconsideration process.
NICE previously considered making bosutinib available through the NHS in 2013 but decided the drug was not cost-effective. So bosutinib was made available to patients via the CDF.
As part of the reappraisal process, Pfizer offered a discount for bosutinib. Taking this discount into consideration, as well as the limited treatment options for CML patients, NICE decided bosutinib is cost-effective.
Bosutinib has conditional approval from the European Commission to treat adults with Philadelphia-chromosome-positive CML in chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase, but only if those patients have previously received one or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are not considered eligible for treatment with imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib.
Patients with HBV inadequately monitored for disease activity
Chronic hepatitis B virus patients are insufficiently monitored for disease activity and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to Philip R. Spradling, MD, and his associates of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In a cohort study of 2,992 patients with CHB, 2,338 were used for assessment. Researchers used alanine aminotransferase (ALT) monitoring, HBV DNA monitoring, assessment for cirrhosis, and HBV antiviral therapy for examination. For ALT monitoring, 1,814 (78%) of patients had at least one ALT level obtained per year of follow-up. Only 876 patients (37%) had at least one HBV DNA level assessment per year of follow-up and 1,037 (44%) had less than annual testing, and 18% of patients never had an HBV DNA level assessed. Among patients with cirrhosis, 297 (54%) had HBV DNA testing done at least annually, 189 (35%) had testing done but less frequently than annually, and 61 (11%) never had an HBV DNA test done. And of the 547 patients with cirrhosis, 305 (56%) were prescribed HBV antiviral therapy.
It was noted that patients were monitored during 2006-2013. Only 68% of patients had not been prescribed treatment, and 72% had received liver-related specialty care.
“Our findings reiterate the need for clinicians who treat patients with [chronic HBV] to provide ongoing, continual assessment of disease activity based on HBV DNA and ALT levels, as well as liver imaging surveillance among patients at high risk for HCC,” researchers concluded. “As antiviral therapy for [chronic HBV] now includes potent and highly efficacious oral agents that have few contraindications and minimal side effects, as well as a high barrier to resistance, clinicians should be vigilant for opportunities to decrease the likelihood of poor clinical outcomes.”
Read the full study in Clinical Infectious Diseases here.
Chronic hepatitis B virus patients are insufficiently monitored for disease activity and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to Philip R. Spradling, MD, and his associates of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In a cohort study of 2,992 patients with CHB, 2,338 were used for assessment. Researchers used alanine aminotransferase (ALT) monitoring, HBV DNA monitoring, assessment for cirrhosis, and HBV antiviral therapy for examination. For ALT monitoring, 1,814 (78%) of patients had at least one ALT level obtained per year of follow-up. Only 876 patients (37%) had at least one HBV DNA level assessment per year of follow-up and 1,037 (44%) had less than annual testing, and 18% of patients never had an HBV DNA level assessed. Among patients with cirrhosis, 297 (54%) had HBV DNA testing done at least annually, 189 (35%) had testing done but less frequently than annually, and 61 (11%) never had an HBV DNA test done. And of the 547 patients with cirrhosis, 305 (56%) were prescribed HBV antiviral therapy.
It was noted that patients were monitored during 2006-2013. Only 68% of patients had not been prescribed treatment, and 72% had received liver-related specialty care.
“Our findings reiterate the need for clinicians who treat patients with [chronic HBV] to provide ongoing, continual assessment of disease activity based on HBV DNA and ALT levels, as well as liver imaging surveillance among patients at high risk for HCC,” researchers concluded. “As antiviral therapy for [chronic HBV] now includes potent and highly efficacious oral agents that have few contraindications and minimal side effects, as well as a high barrier to resistance, clinicians should be vigilant for opportunities to decrease the likelihood of poor clinical outcomes.”
Read the full study in Clinical Infectious Diseases here.
Chronic hepatitis B virus patients are insufficiently monitored for disease activity and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), according to Philip R. Spradling, MD, and his associates of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In a cohort study of 2,992 patients with CHB, 2,338 were used for assessment. Researchers used alanine aminotransferase (ALT) monitoring, HBV DNA monitoring, assessment for cirrhosis, and HBV antiviral therapy for examination. For ALT monitoring, 1,814 (78%) of patients had at least one ALT level obtained per year of follow-up. Only 876 patients (37%) had at least one HBV DNA level assessment per year of follow-up and 1,037 (44%) had less than annual testing, and 18% of patients never had an HBV DNA level assessed. Among patients with cirrhosis, 297 (54%) had HBV DNA testing done at least annually, 189 (35%) had testing done but less frequently than annually, and 61 (11%) never had an HBV DNA test done. And of the 547 patients with cirrhosis, 305 (56%) were prescribed HBV antiviral therapy.
It was noted that patients were monitored during 2006-2013. Only 68% of patients had not been prescribed treatment, and 72% had received liver-related specialty care.
“Our findings reiterate the need for clinicians who treat patients with [chronic HBV] to provide ongoing, continual assessment of disease activity based on HBV DNA and ALT levels, as well as liver imaging surveillance among patients at high risk for HCC,” researchers concluded. “As antiviral therapy for [chronic HBV] now includes potent and highly efficacious oral agents that have few contraindications and minimal side effects, as well as a high barrier to resistance, clinicians should be vigilant for opportunities to decrease the likelihood of poor clinical outcomes.”
Read the full study in Clinical Infectious Diseases here.
FROM CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Summer flu? Think variant swine influenza virus infection
Two children presented with influenza, and both recovered without the need for hospitalization. This scenario would fail to pique the interest of any pediatrician in January. But what about when it happens in July?
In early August, public health authorities in Ohio announced that two children had tested positive for the variant swine influenza virus H3N2v. Both children had direct contact with pigs at the Clark County Fair in late July. Along with a handful of cases diagnosed in Michigan, these represent the first H3N2v cases in the United States in 2016.
Influenza viruses that normally circulate in swine are designated as “variant” when they infect humans. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), human infections with H1N1v, H1N2v, and H3N2v have been identified in the United States. Influenza A H3N2v viruses carrying the matrix gene from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus were first detected in pigs in 2010, and in people in the summer of 2011. Since that time, 357 human cases have been reported from 14 states, with nearly 75% occurring in Indiana and Ohio. Most infections occurred after prolonged exposure to pigs at agricultural fairs.
Fortunately, most H3N2v infections have been mild: Since July 2012, only 21 individuals have required hospitalization and a single case resulted in death. Notably, though, many of the hospitalizations involved children.
On Aug. 15, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released Interim Guidance for Clinicians on Human Infections with Variant Influenza Viruses.
Because variant virus infection is indistinguishable from seasonal influenza or any other virus that cause influenzalike illness (think fever, cough, sore throat), physicians and other frontline providers need to maintain an index of suspicion. The key is eliciting a history of swine exposure in the week before illness onset. Practically, this means asking about direct contact with pigs, indirect contact with pigs, or close contact with an ill person who has had contact with pigs. Kudos to the astute clinicians in Ohio who thought to send the appropriate influenza testing in July.
When variant influenza virus is suspected, a nasopharyngeal swab or aspirate should be obtained for testing at a state public health lab or the CDC. Rapid antigen tests for influenza may be falsely negative in the setting of H3N2v infection, just as they may be with seasonal influenza infection. Molecular tests such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are likely more sensitive, but cannot distinguish variant influenza A viruses from seasonal influenza A viruses.
The Kentucky State Fair opened on Aug. 18, making the CDC guidance especially timely for health care providers in my area. I called a friend who is a pediatric emergency medicine physician to ask if she and her colleagues were routinely screening patients for encounters of the porcine kind.
“For example, are you asking, ‘Have you been showing, raising or feeding swine? Have you been to the pig barn at the fair?’ ”
When my friend quit laughing, I confessed to her that I had not been doing that routinely either. The exposure history is often the most interesting part of the infectious disease evaluation and in the last month, I’ve asked about exposure to sheep (a risk factor for Q fever), exposure to chickens (a risk factor for Salmonella infections), and exposure to beaver dams (a risk factor for blastomycosis). But I’ve not asked about exposure to pigs.
“The emergency medicine approach is to avoid a lot of viral diagnostic testing unless it is going to impact management,” she said. “Tell me how this changes management of my patient.”
From the patient perspective, making a presumptive diagnosis of H3N2v infection would open the door to empiric treatment with antivirals, at least for individuals who are hospitalized, have severe or progressive disease, or who at high risk for complications of influenza. Neuraminidase inhibitors, including oral oseltamivir, inhaled zanamivir, and intravenous peramivir, can be used for treatment of H3N2v infections.
From a societal perspective, making the diagnosis gives public health experts the opportunity to investigate and potentially prevent further infections by isolating sick pigs. Human to human transmission of H3N2v is rare, but has occasionally occurred in households and in one instance, a child care setting. Careful surveillance of each swine flu case in a human is important to exclude the possibility that the virus has developed the ability to spread efficiently from person to person, creating the risk for an epidemic.
Seasonal influenza vaccine does not prevent infection with variant viruses, so avoidance is key. Those at high risk for complications from influenza infection, including children younger than 5 years of age and those with asthma, diabetes, heart disease, immunocompromised conditions, and neurologic or neurodevelopmental disorders, are urged to avoid pigs and swine barns when visiting fairs where the animals are present. Everyone else needs to follow common sense measures to prevent the spread of infection.
• Don’t take food or drink into pig areas; don’t eat, drink or put anything in your mouth in pig areas.
• Don’t take toys, pacifiers, cups, baby bottles, strollers, or similar items into pig areas.
• Wash your hands often with soap and running water before and after exposure to pigs. If soap and water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand rub.
• Avoid close contact with pigs that look or act ill.
• Take protective measures if you must come in contact with pigs that are known or suspected to be sick. This includes wearing personal protective equipment like protective clothing, gloves, and masks that cover your mouth and nose when contact is required.
• To further reduce the risk of infection, minimize contact with pigs in the pig barn and arenas.
It shouldn’t be surprising that flu viruses spread from pigs to people in the same way that regular seasonal influenza spread from person to person. An infected pig coughs or sneezes influenza-containing droplets, and these droplets are inhaled or swallowed by a susceptible human. That makes avoiding contact with pigs that look or act ill especially important. For the record, a pig with flu might have fever, depression, cough, nasal or eye discharge, eye redness, or a poor appetite.
On the bright side, you can’t get H3N2v or any other variant virus from eating properly prepared pork meat. Fairgoers can feel free to indulge in a deep-fried pork chop or one of this year’s featured food items: a basket of French fries topped with smoked pork, cheddar cheese sauce, red onions, jalapeño peppers and barbecue sauce.
Or maybe not. The CDC has a web page devoted to food safety at fairs and festivals. It notes that cases of foodborne illness increase during summer months, and usual safety controls “like monitoring of food temperatures, refrigeration, workers trained in food safety and washing facilities, may not be available when cooking and dining at fairs and festivals.”
The public is urged to seek out “healthy options” from fair vendors first. If healthy options aren’t available, we’re advised to consider bringing food from home to save money and calories.
Sigh. I remember when summer used to be more fun.
Dr. Bryant is a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases at the University of Louisville, Ky. and Kosair Children’s Hospital, also in Louisville.
Two children presented with influenza, and both recovered without the need for hospitalization. This scenario would fail to pique the interest of any pediatrician in January. But what about when it happens in July?
In early August, public health authorities in Ohio announced that two children had tested positive for the variant swine influenza virus H3N2v. Both children had direct contact with pigs at the Clark County Fair in late July. Along with a handful of cases diagnosed in Michigan, these represent the first H3N2v cases in the United States in 2016.
Influenza viruses that normally circulate in swine are designated as “variant” when they infect humans. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), human infections with H1N1v, H1N2v, and H3N2v have been identified in the United States. Influenza A H3N2v viruses carrying the matrix gene from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus were first detected in pigs in 2010, and in people in the summer of 2011. Since that time, 357 human cases have been reported from 14 states, with nearly 75% occurring in Indiana and Ohio. Most infections occurred after prolonged exposure to pigs at agricultural fairs.
Fortunately, most H3N2v infections have been mild: Since July 2012, only 21 individuals have required hospitalization and a single case resulted in death. Notably, though, many of the hospitalizations involved children.
On Aug. 15, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released Interim Guidance for Clinicians on Human Infections with Variant Influenza Viruses.
Because variant virus infection is indistinguishable from seasonal influenza or any other virus that cause influenzalike illness (think fever, cough, sore throat), physicians and other frontline providers need to maintain an index of suspicion. The key is eliciting a history of swine exposure in the week before illness onset. Practically, this means asking about direct contact with pigs, indirect contact with pigs, or close contact with an ill person who has had contact with pigs. Kudos to the astute clinicians in Ohio who thought to send the appropriate influenza testing in July.
When variant influenza virus is suspected, a nasopharyngeal swab or aspirate should be obtained for testing at a state public health lab or the CDC. Rapid antigen tests for influenza may be falsely negative in the setting of H3N2v infection, just as they may be with seasonal influenza infection. Molecular tests such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are likely more sensitive, but cannot distinguish variant influenza A viruses from seasonal influenza A viruses.
The Kentucky State Fair opened on Aug. 18, making the CDC guidance especially timely for health care providers in my area. I called a friend who is a pediatric emergency medicine physician to ask if she and her colleagues were routinely screening patients for encounters of the porcine kind.
“For example, are you asking, ‘Have you been showing, raising or feeding swine? Have you been to the pig barn at the fair?’ ”
When my friend quit laughing, I confessed to her that I had not been doing that routinely either. The exposure history is often the most interesting part of the infectious disease evaluation and in the last month, I’ve asked about exposure to sheep (a risk factor for Q fever), exposure to chickens (a risk factor for Salmonella infections), and exposure to beaver dams (a risk factor for blastomycosis). But I’ve not asked about exposure to pigs.
“The emergency medicine approach is to avoid a lot of viral diagnostic testing unless it is going to impact management,” she said. “Tell me how this changes management of my patient.”
From the patient perspective, making a presumptive diagnosis of H3N2v infection would open the door to empiric treatment with antivirals, at least for individuals who are hospitalized, have severe or progressive disease, or who at high risk for complications of influenza. Neuraminidase inhibitors, including oral oseltamivir, inhaled zanamivir, and intravenous peramivir, can be used for treatment of H3N2v infections.
From a societal perspective, making the diagnosis gives public health experts the opportunity to investigate and potentially prevent further infections by isolating sick pigs. Human to human transmission of H3N2v is rare, but has occasionally occurred in households and in one instance, a child care setting. Careful surveillance of each swine flu case in a human is important to exclude the possibility that the virus has developed the ability to spread efficiently from person to person, creating the risk for an epidemic.
Seasonal influenza vaccine does not prevent infection with variant viruses, so avoidance is key. Those at high risk for complications from influenza infection, including children younger than 5 years of age and those with asthma, diabetes, heart disease, immunocompromised conditions, and neurologic or neurodevelopmental disorders, are urged to avoid pigs and swine barns when visiting fairs where the animals are present. Everyone else needs to follow common sense measures to prevent the spread of infection.
• Don’t take food or drink into pig areas; don’t eat, drink or put anything in your mouth in pig areas.
• Don’t take toys, pacifiers, cups, baby bottles, strollers, or similar items into pig areas.
• Wash your hands often with soap and running water before and after exposure to pigs. If soap and water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand rub.
• Avoid close contact with pigs that look or act ill.
• Take protective measures if you must come in contact with pigs that are known or suspected to be sick. This includes wearing personal protective equipment like protective clothing, gloves, and masks that cover your mouth and nose when contact is required.
• To further reduce the risk of infection, minimize contact with pigs in the pig barn and arenas.
It shouldn’t be surprising that flu viruses spread from pigs to people in the same way that regular seasonal influenza spread from person to person. An infected pig coughs or sneezes influenza-containing droplets, and these droplets are inhaled or swallowed by a susceptible human. That makes avoiding contact with pigs that look or act ill especially important. For the record, a pig with flu might have fever, depression, cough, nasal or eye discharge, eye redness, or a poor appetite.
On the bright side, you can’t get H3N2v or any other variant virus from eating properly prepared pork meat. Fairgoers can feel free to indulge in a deep-fried pork chop or one of this year’s featured food items: a basket of French fries topped with smoked pork, cheddar cheese sauce, red onions, jalapeño peppers and barbecue sauce.
Or maybe not. The CDC has a web page devoted to food safety at fairs and festivals. It notes that cases of foodborne illness increase during summer months, and usual safety controls “like monitoring of food temperatures, refrigeration, workers trained in food safety and washing facilities, may not be available when cooking and dining at fairs and festivals.”
The public is urged to seek out “healthy options” from fair vendors first. If healthy options aren’t available, we’re advised to consider bringing food from home to save money and calories.
Sigh. I remember when summer used to be more fun.
Dr. Bryant is a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases at the University of Louisville, Ky. and Kosair Children’s Hospital, also in Louisville.
Two children presented with influenza, and both recovered without the need for hospitalization. This scenario would fail to pique the interest of any pediatrician in January. But what about when it happens in July?
In early August, public health authorities in Ohio announced that two children had tested positive for the variant swine influenza virus H3N2v. Both children had direct contact with pigs at the Clark County Fair in late July. Along with a handful of cases diagnosed in Michigan, these represent the first H3N2v cases in the United States in 2016.
Influenza viruses that normally circulate in swine are designated as “variant” when they infect humans. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), human infections with H1N1v, H1N2v, and H3N2v have been identified in the United States. Influenza A H3N2v viruses carrying the matrix gene from the 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus were first detected in pigs in 2010, and in people in the summer of 2011. Since that time, 357 human cases have been reported from 14 states, with nearly 75% occurring in Indiana and Ohio. Most infections occurred after prolonged exposure to pigs at agricultural fairs.
Fortunately, most H3N2v infections have been mild: Since July 2012, only 21 individuals have required hospitalization and a single case resulted in death. Notably, though, many of the hospitalizations involved children.
On Aug. 15, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released Interim Guidance for Clinicians on Human Infections with Variant Influenza Viruses.
Because variant virus infection is indistinguishable from seasonal influenza or any other virus that cause influenzalike illness (think fever, cough, sore throat), physicians and other frontline providers need to maintain an index of suspicion. The key is eliciting a history of swine exposure in the week before illness onset. Practically, this means asking about direct contact with pigs, indirect contact with pigs, or close contact with an ill person who has had contact with pigs. Kudos to the astute clinicians in Ohio who thought to send the appropriate influenza testing in July.
When variant influenza virus is suspected, a nasopharyngeal swab or aspirate should be obtained for testing at a state public health lab or the CDC. Rapid antigen tests for influenza may be falsely negative in the setting of H3N2v infection, just as they may be with seasonal influenza infection. Molecular tests such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are likely more sensitive, but cannot distinguish variant influenza A viruses from seasonal influenza A viruses.
The Kentucky State Fair opened on Aug. 18, making the CDC guidance especially timely for health care providers in my area. I called a friend who is a pediatric emergency medicine physician to ask if she and her colleagues were routinely screening patients for encounters of the porcine kind.
“For example, are you asking, ‘Have you been showing, raising or feeding swine? Have you been to the pig barn at the fair?’ ”
When my friend quit laughing, I confessed to her that I had not been doing that routinely either. The exposure history is often the most interesting part of the infectious disease evaluation and in the last month, I’ve asked about exposure to sheep (a risk factor for Q fever), exposure to chickens (a risk factor for Salmonella infections), and exposure to beaver dams (a risk factor for blastomycosis). But I’ve not asked about exposure to pigs.
“The emergency medicine approach is to avoid a lot of viral diagnostic testing unless it is going to impact management,” she said. “Tell me how this changes management of my patient.”
From the patient perspective, making a presumptive diagnosis of H3N2v infection would open the door to empiric treatment with antivirals, at least for individuals who are hospitalized, have severe or progressive disease, or who at high risk for complications of influenza. Neuraminidase inhibitors, including oral oseltamivir, inhaled zanamivir, and intravenous peramivir, can be used for treatment of H3N2v infections.
From a societal perspective, making the diagnosis gives public health experts the opportunity to investigate and potentially prevent further infections by isolating sick pigs. Human to human transmission of H3N2v is rare, but has occasionally occurred in households and in one instance, a child care setting. Careful surveillance of each swine flu case in a human is important to exclude the possibility that the virus has developed the ability to spread efficiently from person to person, creating the risk for an epidemic.
Seasonal influenza vaccine does not prevent infection with variant viruses, so avoidance is key. Those at high risk for complications from influenza infection, including children younger than 5 years of age and those with asthma, diabetes, heart disease, immunocompromised conditions, and neurologic or neurodevelopmental disorders, are urged to avoid pigs and swine barns when visiting fairs where the animals are present. Everyone else needs to follow common sense measures to prevent the spread of infection.
• Don’t take food or drink into pig areas; don’t eat, drink or put anything in your mouth in pig areas.
• Don’t take toys, pacifiers, cups, baby bottles, strollers, or similar items into pig areas.
• Wash your hands often with soap and running water before and after exposure to pigs. If soap and water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand rub.
• Avoid close contact with pigs that look or act ill.
• Take protective measures if you must come in contact with pigs that are known or suspected to be sick. This includes wearing personal protective equipment like protective clothing, gloves, and masks that cover your mouth and nose when contact is required.
• To further reduce the risk of infection, minimize contact with pigs in the pig barn and arenas.
It shouldn’t be surprising that flu viruses spread from pigs to people in the same way that regular seasonal influenza spread from person to person. An infected pig coughs or sneezes influenza-containing droplets, and these droplets are inhaled or swallowed by a susceptible human. That makes avoiding contact with pigs that look or act ill especially important. For the record, a pig with flu might have fever, depression, cough, nasal or eye discharge, eye redness, or a poor appetite.
On the bright side, you can’t get H3N2v or any other variant virus from eating properly prepared pork meat. Fairgoers can feel free to indulge in a deep-fried pork chop or one of this year’s featured food items: a basket of French fries topped with smoked pork, cheddar cheese sauce, red onions, jalapeño peppers and barbecue sauce.
Or maybe not. The CDC has a web page devoted to food safety at fairs and festivals. It notes that cases of foodborne illness increase during summer months, and usual safety controls “like monitoring of food temperatures, refrigeration, workers trained in food safety and washing facilities, may not be available when cooking and dining at fairs and festivals.”
The public is urged to seek out “healthy options” from fair vendors first. If healthy options aren’t available, we’re advised to consider bringing food from home to save money and calories.
Sigh. I remember when summer used to be more fun.
Dr. Bryant is a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases at the University of Louisville, Ky. and Kosair Children’s Hospital, also in Louisville.
Proper treatment of herpes zoster ‘a work in progress’
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. – In medical school you may have been taught that herpes zoster infection primarily impacts elderly patients, but the burden of disease is shifting – along with the understanding of herpes zoster itself.
“Herpes zoster is a disease that can lull us into a false sense of security because we see it all the time,” Iris Ahronowitz, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. “But our understanding of how to manage this disease is still very much a work in progress.”
She noted that while 50% of people will acquire herpes zoster by the time they reach 85 years of age due to diminishing cell-mediated immunity, the major burden of disease impacts immunocompromised patients of all ages. HIV patients and solid-organ transplant recipients are well known to face an increased risk of acquiring herpes zoster, but the most overwhelming risk is seen in leukemia patients, who have rates as high as 100-fold that of the general population.
“More recent data on stem cell transplant patients show that about 50% of them will get zoster,” added Dr. Ahronowitz, a dermatologist at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. “Most of that’s happening within the first year and a half after their transplant.”
Several recent epidemiologic studies in the medical literature have reported herpes zoster in patients who are not traditionally believed to be immunosuppressed, such as those with lupus, dermatomyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis. “It begs the question: is it the disease or is it the treatment?” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “We don’t know the answer to that yet. In dermatomyositis and lupus, use of antimalarials has been found to be most associated with the risk of herpes zoster. Other studies looking at one disease are so heterogeneous, some saying that it’s one medication, some saying that it’s another. There’s no cohesive message yet about which medications cause the highest risk of zoster.”
Herpes zoster was originally believed to be far less transmissible than varicella. “Later it was thought that the only way that you can get VZV [varicella zoster virus] from a zoster patient was by direct contact with vesicle fluid,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “That turns out to be wrong as well.” One study of pediatric patients found similar rates of secondary varicella cases from varicella and herpes zoster cases (15% vs. 9%, respectively), regardless of anatomic location of zoster (J Infect Dis. 2012; 205[9]:1336-41).
Another report that called into question prevailing beliefs about the disease involved an immunocompetent patient in a long-term care facility who developed localized herpes zoster (J Infect Dis. 2008;197[5]:646-53). That individual turned out to be “patient zero” in a varicella outbreak in the facility, even though the person’s lesions had been covered by gauze and clothing at all times. “The next patient who got infected was one of the health care workers who had never been in the room at the same time as the patient but who had changed the patient’s bed linens,” said Dr. Ahronowitz, who was not involved with the study. “Environmental samples were collected from the patient’s room and were contaminated with VZV DNA.”
She went on to note that VZV DNA has been found in vesicle fluid, serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and saliva. One randomized, controlled trial found that hydrocolloid dressings are superior to traditional gauze and paper dressings in preventing the excretion of aerosolized VZV DNA from skin lesions of patients with localized herpes zoster (J Infect Dis. 2004;189[6]:1009-12). Using hydrocolloid dressings to cover lesions “does seem to make a difference,” she said. “Because of all this new data coming out, I think it’s time to reconsider isolation precautions in all hospitalized patients with herpes zoster, because the consequences of VZV transmission within a hospital where there are other patients nearby who have low immune systems could be absolutely devastating.”
The impact of herpes zoster infection on the central nervous system can be significant, including cranial nerve palsy, encephalitis, encephalopathy, and aseptic meningitis. “Patients can have long-lasting residual neurologic deficits from this at 6 months or longer despite appropriate treatment,” she said. “No correlation between CSF viral load and neurologic sequelae has been found at 3 months.”
More recent research has found an association between herpes zoster infection and an increased risk of stroke – up to threefold in some cases. “That risk doesn’t normalize until 6 months after the infection,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “We’re even seeing it in kids, who have two times the risk of stroke in the first 6 months after VZV infection.” MI risk also seems to be elevated as a secondary outcome (a 1.7-fold increase in the first week of infection).
“There have also been recent reports of VZV antigen/DNA found in the vessel wall of patients with giant cell arteritis and granulomatous arteritis of the aorta,” she said. “This is an evolving story about zoster that we never knew about.”
Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is also associated with CNS manifestations, but they resolve much faster, unlike those of CNS zoster. “As long as you take away the offending medication and put them on steroids they will recover very quickly,” she said. At least one case in the medical literature to date has reported DIHS in association with VZV (Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95[4]:503-4).
The zoster vaccine (Zostavax, Merck & Co.) is currently indicated in patients aged 60 years and older, but since it is a live attenuated vaccine, it is contraindicated in many patients who could most benefit from it, including those with primary immunodeficiency disorders, those with a hematologic malignancy, those who have had a hematopoietic stem cell transplant within the last 2 years, pregnant patients, and patients taking high-dose steroids or anti–tumor necrosis factor biologics.
“There is an inactivated vaccine in the works being tested, and that is showing good efficacy,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “Hopefully we’ll be able to prevaccinate patients, even young patients, prior to immune suppression.”
She reported having no relevant disclosures.
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. – In medical school you may have been taught that herpes zoster infection primarily impacts elderly patients, but the burden of disease is shifting – along with the understanding of herpes zoster itself.
“Herpes zoster is a disease that can lull us into a false sense of security because we see it all the time,” Iris Ahronowitz, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. “But our understanding of how to manage this disease is still very much a work in progress.”
She noted that while 50% of people will acquire herpes zoster by the time they reach 85 years of age due to diminishing cell-mediated immunity, the major burden of disease impacts immunocompromised patients of all ages. HIV patients and solid-organ transplant recipients are well known to face an increased risk of acquiring herpes zoster, but the most overwhelming risk is seen in leukemia patients, who have rates as high as 100-fold that of the general population.
“More recent data on stem cell transplant patients show that about 50% of them will get zoster,” added Dr. Ahronowitz, a dermatologist at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. “Most of that’s happening within the first year and a half after their transplant.”
Several recent epidemiologic studies in the medical literature have reported herpes zoster in patients who are not traditionally believed to be immunosuppressed, such as those with lupus, dermatomyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis. “It begs the question: is it the disease or is it the treatment?” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “We don’t know the answer to that yet. In dermatomyositis and lupus, use of antimalarials has been found to be most associated with the risk of herpes zoster. Other studies looking at one disease are so heterogeneous, some saying that it’s one medication, some saying that it’s another. There’s no cohesive message yet about which medications cause the highest risk of zoster.”
Herpes zoster was originally believed to be far less transmissible than varicella. “Later it was thought that the only way that you can get VZV [varicella zoster virus] from a zoster patient was by direct contact with vesicle fluid,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “That turns out to be wrong as well.” One study of pediatric patients found similar rates of secondary varicella cases from varicella and herpes zoster cases (15% vs. 9%, respectively), regardless of anatomic location of zoster (J Infect Dis. 2012; 205[9]:1336-41).
Another report that called into question prevailing beliefs about the disease involved an immunocompetent patient in a long-term care facility who developed localized herpes zoster (J Infect Dis. 2008;197[5]:646-53). That individual turned out to be “patient zero” in a varicella outbreak in the facility, even though the person’s lesions had been covered by gauze and clothing at all times. “The next patient who got infected was one of the health care workers who had never been in the room at the same time as the patient but who had changed the patient’s bed linens,” said Dr. Ahronowitz, who was not involved with the study. “Environmental samples were collected from the patient’s room and were contaminated with VZV DNA.”
She went on to note that VZV DNA has been found in vesicle fluid, serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and saliva. One randomized, controlled trial found that hydrocolloid dressings are superior to traditional gauze and paper dressings in preventing the excretion of aerosolized VZV DNA from skin lesions of patients with localized herpes zoster (J Infect Dis. 2004;189[6]:1009-12). Using hydrocolloid dressings to cover lesions “does seem to make a difference,” she said. “Because of all this new data coming out, I think it’s time to reconsider isolation precautions in all hospitalized patients with herpes zoster, because the consequences of VZV transmission within a hospital where there are other patients nearby who have low immune systems could be absolutely devastating.”
The impact of herpes zoster infection on the central nervous system can be significant, including cranial nerve palsy, encephalitis, encephalopathy, and aseptic meningitis. “Patients can have long-lasting residual neurologic deficits from this at 6 months or longer despite appropriate treatment,” she said. “No correlation between CSF viral load and neurologic sequelae has been found at 3 months.”
More recent research has found an association between herpes zoster infection and an increased risk of stroke – up to threefold in some cases. “That risk doesn’t normalize until 6 months after the infection,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “We’re even seeing it in kids, who have two times the risk of stroke in the first 6 months after VZV infection.” MI risk also seems to be elevated as a secondary outcome (a 1.7-fold increase in the first week of infection).
“There have also been recent reports of VZV antigen/DNA found in the vessel wall of patients with giant cell arteritis and granulomatous arteritis of the aorta,” she said. “This is an evolving story about zoster that we never knew about.”
Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is also associated with CNS manifestations, but they resolve much faster, unlike those of CNS zoster. “As long as you take away the offending medication and put them on steroids they will recover very quickly,” she said. At least one case in the medical literature to date has reported DIHS in association with VZV (Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95[4]:503-4).
The zoster vaccine (Zostavax, Merck & Co.) is currently indicated in patients aged 60 years and older, but since it is a live attenuated vaccine, it is contraindicated in many patients who could most benefit from it, including those with primary immunodeficiency disorders, those with a hematologic malignancy, those who have had a hematopoietic stem cell transplant within the last 2 years, pregnant patients, and patients taking high-dose steroids or anti–tumor necrosis factor biologics.
“There is an inactivated vaccine in the works being tested, and that is showing good efficacy,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “Hopefully we’ll be able to prevaccinate patients, even young patients, prior to immune suppression.”
She reported having no relevant disclosures.
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. – In medical school you may have been taught that herpes zoster infection primarily impacts elderly patients, but the burden of disease is shifting – along with the understanding of herpes zoster itself.
“Herpes zoster is a disease that can lull us into a false sense of security because we see it all the time,” Iris Ahronowitz, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. “But our understanding of how to manage this disease is still very much a work in progress.”
She noted that while 50% of people will acquire herpes zoster by the time they reach 85 years of age due to diminishing cell-mediated immunity, the major burden of disease impacts immunocompromised patients of all ages. HIV patients and solid-organ transplant recipients are well known to face an increased risk of acquiring herpes zoster, but the most overwhelming risk is seen in leukemia patients, who have rates as high as 100-fold that of the general population.
“More recent data on stem cell transplant patients show that about 50% of them will get zoster,” added Dr. Ahronowitz, a dermatologist at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. “Most of that’s happening within the first year and a half after their transplant.”
Several recent epidemiologic studies in the medical literature have reported herpes zoster in patients who are not traditionally believed to be immunosuppressed, such as those with lupus, dermatomyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis. “It begs the question: is it the disease or is it the treatment?” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “We don’t know the answer to that yet. In dermatomyositis and lupus, use of antimalarials has been found to be most associated with the risk of herpes zoster. Other studies looking at one disease are so heterogeneous, some saying that it’s one medication, some saying that it’s another. There’s no cohesive message yet about which medications cause the highest risk of zoster.”
Herpes zoster was originally believed to be far less transmissible than varicella. “Later it was thought that the only way that you can get VZV [varicella zoster virus] from a zoster patient was by direct contact with vesicle fluid,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “That turns out to be wrong as well.” One study of pediatric patients found similar rates of secondary varicella cases from varicella and herpes zoster cases (15% vs. 9%, respectively), regardless of anatomic location of zoster (J Infect Dis. 2012; 205[9]:1336-41).
Another report that called into question prevailing beliefs about the disease involved an immunocompetent patient in a long-term care facility who developed localized herpes zoster (J Infect Dis. 2008;197[5]:646-53). That individual turned out to be “patient zero” in a varicella outbreak in the facility, even though the person’s lesions had been covered by gauze and clothing at all times. “The next patient who got infected was one of the health care workers who had never been in the room at the same time as the patient but who had changed the patient’s bed linens,” said Dr. Ahronowitz, who was not involved with the study. “Environmental samples were collected from the patient’s room and were contaminated with VZV DNA.”
She went on to note that VZV DNA has been found in vesicle fluid, serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and saliva. One randomized, controlled trial found that hydrocolloid dressings are superior to traditional gauze and paper dressings in preventing the excretion of aerosolized VZV DNA from skin lesions of patients with localized herpes zoster (J Infect Dis. 2004;189[6]:1009-12). Using hydrocolloid dressings to cover lesions “does seem to make a difference,” she said. “Because of all this new data coming out, I think it’s time to reconsider isolation precautions in all hospitalized patients with herpes zoster, because the consequences of VZV transmission within a hospital where there are other patients nearby who have low immune systems could be absolutely devastating.”
The impact of herpes zoster infection on the central nervous system can be significant, including cranial nerve palsy, encephalitis, encephalopathy, and aseptic meningitis. “Patients can have long-lasting residual neurologic deficits from this at 6 months or longer despite appropriate treatment,” she said. “No correlation between CSF viral load and neurologic sequelae has been found at 3 months.”
More recent research has found an association between herpes zoster infection and an increased risk of stroke – up to threefold in some cases. “That risk doesn’t normalize until 6 months after the infection,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “We’re even seeing it in kids, who have two times the risk of stroke in the first 6 months after VZV infection.” MI risk also seems to be elevated as a secondary outcome (a 1.7-fold increase in the first week of infection).
“There have also been recent reports of VZV antigen/DNA found in the vessel wall of patients with giant cell arteritis and granulomatous arteritis of the aorta,” she said. “This is an evolving story about zoster that we never knew about.”
Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is also associated with CNS manifestations, but they resolve much faster, unlike those of CNS zoster. “As long as you take away the offending medication and put them on steroids they will recover very quickly,” she said. At least one case in the medical literature to date has reported DIHS in association with VZV (Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95[4]:503-4).
The zoster vaccine (Zostavax, Merck & Co.) is currently indicated in patients aged 60 years and older, but since it is a live attenuated vaccine, it is contraindicated in many patients who could most benefit from it, including those with primary immunodeficiency disorders, those with a hematologic malignancy, those who have had a hematopoietic stem cell transplant within the last 2 years, pregnant patients, and patients taking high-dose steroids or anti–tumor necrosis factor biologics.
“There is an inactivated vaccine in the works being tested, and that is showing good efficacy,” Dr. Ahronowitz said. “Hopefully we’ll be able to prevaccinate patients, even young patients, prior to immune suppression.”
She reported having no relevant disclosures.
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT PDA 2016
Self-Administered Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation May Pose Serious Risks
Neuroscientists cautioned patients about the dangers of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in an open letter published July 7 in Annals of Neurology. “We perceive an ethical obligation to draw the attention of both professionals and ‘do it yourself’ (DIY) users to some of these issues,” said Michael D. Fox, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston. The open letter, written by four neuroscientists and signed by 39 colleagues, addresses several less commonly recognized complications of self-administered brain stimulation.
Noninvasive electrical brain stimulation may help ameliorate symptoms of anxiety and depression; however, neuroscientists say that much about this technique remains unknown and could present potential risks for DIY users. “We have never formally studied tDCS at the frequencies many DIY users experiment with—for example, stimulating daily for months or longer. Because we know that stimulation from just a few sessions can be quite lasting, we infer that changes induced by these protocols may be even more so,” said Dr. Fox.
A further consideration is that tDCS affects more of the brain than people may think. Although electrodes are normally placed in specific scalp locations to target specific parts of the brain, stimulation extends beyond the regions beneath the electrodes and can result in unintended altering of brain functions.
Self-administered brain stimulation may have a different impact on neurons that are active during stimulation versus neurons that are inactive during stimulation, according to the neurologists. “Because of this feature, the cognitive or behavioral activity occurring while tDCS is applied will modify the effects,” said Dr. Fox. Stimulation may affect the brain differently depending on whether it is applied while the subject is watching TV, sleeping, or performing other daily tasks, he added.
In addition, while some cognitive abilities may be enhanced with tDCS, other abilities may be impacted negatively. “Such cognitive tradeoffs could develop over time and only become recognizable long after the stimulation,” said Dr. Fox. Also, small changes in tDCS settings such as current amplitude and electrode activity could result in negative effects on brain function, said the neurologists.
The authors emphasized that the response to tDCS is unpredictable; subjects respond differently to changes in cortical excitability. For example, age, gender, hormones, cognitive ability, and head anatomy can modify the effects of tDCS in the brain. “Up to 30% of experimental subjects respond with changes in cortical excitability in the opposite direction from other subjects using identical tDCS settings,” said Dr. Fox.
“We encourage consideration of these issues and involvement of health care providers in making decisions regarding DIY brain stimulation,” said Dr. Fox. He and his coauthors recommended that parents weigh the risks before using this device for children, especially since minors are not able to fully assess the potential dangers of tDCS.
—Erica Robinson
Suggested Reading
Wexler A. The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposal. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(4):211-215.
Wurzman R, Hamilton RH, Pascual-Leone A, Fox MD. An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(1):1-4.
Neuroscientists cautioned patients about the dangers of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in an open letter published July 7 in Annals of Neurology. “We perceive an ethical obligation to draw the attention of both professionals and ‘do it yourself’ (DIY) users to some of these issues,” said Michael D. Fox, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston. The open letter, written by four neuroscientists and signed by 39 colleagues, addresses several less commonly recognized complications of self-administered brain stimulation.
Noninvasive electrical brain stimulation may help ameliorate symptoms of anxiety and depression; however, neuroscientists say that much about this technique remains unknown and could present potential risks for DIY users. “We have never formally studied tDCS at the frequencies many DIY users experiment with—for example, stimulating daily for months or longer. Because we know that stimulation from just a few sessions can be quite lasting, we infer that changes induced by these protocols may be even more so,” said Dr. Fox.
A further consideration is that tDCS affects more of the brain than people may think. Although electrodes are normally placed in specific scalp locations to target specific parts of the brain, stimulation extends beyond the regions beneath the electrodes and can result in unintended altering of brain functions.
Self-administered brain stimulation may have a different impact on neurons that are active during stimulation versus neurons that are inactive during stimulation, according to the neurologists. “Because of this feature, the cognitive or behavioral activity occurring while tDCS is applied will modify the effects,” said Dr. Fox. Stimulation may affect the brain differently depending on whether it is applied while the subject is watching TV, sleeping, or performing other daily tasks, he added.
In addition, while some cognitive abilities may be enhanced with tDCS, other abilities may be impacted negatively. “Such cognitive tradeoffs could develop over time and only become recognizable long after the stimulation,” said Dr. Fox. Also, small changes in tDCS settings such as current amplitude and electrode activity could result in negative effects on brain function, said the neurologists.
The authors emphasized that the response to tDCS is unpredictable; subjects respond differently to changes in cortical excitability. For example, age, gender, hormones, cognitive ability, and head anatomy can modify the effects of tDCS in the brain. “Up to 30% of experimental subjects respond with changes in cortical excitability in the opposite direction from other subjects using identical tDCS settings,” said Dr. Fox.
“We encourage consideration of these issues and involvement of health care providers in making decisions regarding DIY brain stimulation,” said Dr. Fox. He and his coauthors recommended that parents weigh the risks before using this device for children, especially since minors are not able to fully assess the potential dangers of tDCS.
—Erica Robinson
Neuroscientists cautioned patients about the dangers of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in an open letter published July 7 in Annals of Neurology. “We perceive an ethical obligation to draw the attention of both professionals and ‘do it yourself’ (DIY) users to some of these issues,” said Michael D. Fox, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School in Boston. The open letter, written by four neuroscientists and signed by 39 colleagues, addresses several less commonly recognized complications of self-administered brain stimulation.
Noninvasive electrical brain stimulation may help ameliorate symptoms of anxiety and depression; however, neuroscientists say that much about this technique remains unknown and could present potential risks for DIY users. “We have never formally studied tDCS at the frequencies many DIY users experiment with—for example, stimulating daily for months or longer. Because we know that stimulation from just a few sessions can be quite lasting, we infer that changes induced by these protocols may be even more so,” said Dr. Fox.
A further consideration is that tDCS affects more of the brain than people may think. Although electrodes are normally placed in specific scalp locations to target specific parts of the brain, stimulation extends beyond the regions beneath the electrodes and can result in unintended altering of brain functions.
Self-administered brain stimulation may have a different impact on neurons that are active during stimulation versus neurons that are inactive during stimulation, according to the neurologists. “Because of this feature, the cognitive or behavioral activity occurring while tDCS is applied will modify the effects,” said Dr. Fox. Stimulation may affect the brain differently depending on whether it is applied while the subject is watching TV, sleeping, or performing other daily tasks, he added.
In addition, while some cognitive abilities may be enhanced with tDCS, other abilities may be impacted negatively. “Such cognitive tradeoffs could develop over time and only become recognizable long after the stimulation,” said Dr. Fox. Also, small changes in tDCS settings such as current amplitude and electrode activity could result in negative effects on brain function, said the neurologists.
The authors emphasized that the response to tDCS is unpredictable; subjects respond differently to changes in cortical excitability. For example, age, gender, hormones, cognitive ability, and head anatomy can modify the effects of tDCS in the brain. “Up to 30% of experimental subjects respond with changes in cortical excitability in the opposite direction from other subjects using identical tDCS settings,” said Dr. Fox.
“We encourage consideration of these issues and involvement of health care providers in making decisions regarding DIY brain stimulation,” said Dr. Fox. He and his coauthors recommended that parents weigh the risks before using this device for children, especially since minors are not able to fully assess the potential dangers of tDCS.
—Erica Robinson
Suggested Reading
Wexler A. The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposal. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(4):211-215.
Wurzman R, Hamilton RH, Pascual-Leone A, Fox MD. An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(1):1-4.
Suggested Reading
Wexler A. The practices of do-it-yourself brain stimulation: implications for ethical considerations and regulatory proposal. J Med Ethics. 2016;42(4):211-215.
Wurzman R, Hamilton RH, Pascual-Leone A, Fox MD. An open letter concerning do-it-yourself users of transcranial direct current stimulation. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(1):1-4.
Expert shares photodynamic therapy pearls
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. – Offering photodynamic therapy is a smart move for any dermatology practice, but also it requires common sense. That starts with making sure you treat only appropriate candidates.
“They can’t be intimidated by the thought of light or looking red, and you have to go into depth ahead of time as far as managing reactions, as well as long-term expectations,” Neal Bhatia, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. That includes reviewing any oral medications they’re taking, as well as topical products they may be using on their face or scalp.
“I like to do this treatment on Fridays so it gives patients the weekend to stay indoors for the next 48 hours, which is really what they need to optimize the response rate,” said Dr. Bhatia, director of clinical dermatology at Therapeutics Clinical Research in San Diego. “The other part of this is managing your staff. Make sure they have enough time to check in on the patients while they’re incubating away from light, as well as to review the post-treatment plan. And make sure they have a comfortable chair. Some patients might feel claustrophobic if you lay them down and put the light above them. Others might like to lay down for the procedure versus sitting down.”
His checklist for treatment day includes a reminder for patients to bring a wide-brimmed hat to shield the treated lesions from ambient light, as well as a book, computer, or paperwork to pass the time. He also advises putting together a take-home bag for patients that includes topical anesthetics, moisturizers, and sunscreen. In his clinical experience, prior to photodynamic therapy (PDT), there is no reason for patients to discontinue medications that are sensitizing in the UV spectrum such as antibiotics, diuretics, anti-hypertensives, since PDT works in the 410-417 nm range. “If you are concerned, you can hold the drugs the day before [the procedure], the day of, and maybe the day after, but that’s really all you need,” he said.
Dr. Bhatia discussed combinations with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) before and after PDT, imiquimod plus aminolevulinic acid–PDT (ALA-PDT), and ingenol mebutate plus ALA-PDT. Antihistamines may play a role in helping to reduce the anticipated ALA-PDT response (J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126[10]:2296-301). Dr. Bhatia explained that the edema component is generated by mast cell release and can be uncoupled using selected H1-antihistamines, which can provide symptom relief without compromising efficacy. “Some studies talk about reducing erythema and edema based on the presence of mast cells and the surge of mast cells within first 48 to 72 hours,” he said. “Symptomatic relief is going to mean a lot to that patient who’s getting red, feeling itchy, and feeling swollen, but we don’t want to stop the reaction pattern and the efficacy by undoing what we’ve created as a response.”
It may seem counterintuitive, but direct tissue cooling after PDT appears to have a negative impact on perforin conversion, “to the point where it actually reduces the efficacy and treatment when you do direct tissue cooling,” Dr. Bhatia said. One study showed found significantly less resolution of actinic keratosis (AK) lesions treated with direct tissue cooling, compared with those who did not receive tissue cooling (J Photochem Photobiol B. 2011;103:1-7). In addition, there was a failure of conversion and optimization of the accumulated protoporphyrin IX when direct tissue cooling was used.
“That’s not to say a handheld fan or a fan in the room or aerating, making sure they have enough oxygen around the treatment area [isn’t useful],” Dr. Bhatia said. “I’m talking about the direct tissue cooling that we use with the pulsed laser device, or the Zimmer cooler. You get better conversion when you have a warming device, compared with contact cooling.”
Dr. Bhatia predicted that in the future, microneedle pre-treatment of human skin is going to gain popularity as a PDT adjunct. On early study of microneedling found that it improved 5-ALA and 5-MAL–induced protoporphyrin IX production for topical photodynamic therapy without increasing pain or erythema (Pharm Res. 2010;27[10]:2213-20). “I think that’s very important,” he said.
Dr. Bhatia disclosed having affiliations with Biofrontera and Dusa, the two main manufacturers of PDT in the United States.
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. – Offering photodynamic therapy is a smart move for any dermatology practice, but also it requires common sense. That starts with making sure you treat only appropriate candidates.
“They can’t be intimidated by the thought of light or looking red, and you have to go into depth ahead of time as far as managing reactions, as well as long-term expectations,” Neal Bhatia, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. That includes reviewing any oral medications they’re taking, as well as topical products they may be using on their face or scalp.
“I like to do this treatment on Fridays so it gives patients the weekend to stay indoors for the next 48 hours, which is really what they need to optimize the response rate,” said Dr. Bhatia, director of clinical dermatology at Therapeutics Clinical Research in San Diego. “The other part of this is managing your staff. Make sure they have enough time to check in on the patients while they’re incubating away from light, as well as to review the post-treatment plan. And make sure they have a comfortable chair. Some patients might feel claustrophobic if you lay them down and put the light above them. Others might like to lay down for the procedure versus sitting down.”
His checklist for treatment day includes a reminder for patients to bring a wide-brimmed hat to shield the treated lesions from ambient light, as well as a book, computer, or paperwork to pass the time. He also advises putting together a take-home bag for patients that includes topical anesthetics, moisturizers, and sunscreen. In his clinical experience, prior to photodynamic therapy (PDT), there is no reason for patients to discontinue medications that are sensitizing in the UV spectrum such as antibiotics, diuretics, anti-hypertensives, since PDT works in the 410-417 nm range. “If you are concerned, you can hold the drugs the day before [the procedure], the day of, and maybe the day after, but that’s really all you need,” he said.
Dr. Bhatia discussed combinations with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) before and after PDT, imiquimod plus aminolevulinic acid–PDT (ALA-PDT), and ingenol mebutate plus ALA-PDT. Antihistamines may play a role in helping to reduce the anticipated ALA-PDT response (J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126[10]:2296-301). Dr. Bhatia explained that the edema component is generated by mast cell release and can be uncoupled using selected H1-antihistamines, which can provide symptom relief without compromising efficacy. “Some studies talk about reducing erythema and edema based on the presence of mast cells and the surge of mast cells within first 48 to 72 hours,” he said. “Symptomatic relief is going to mean a lot to that patient who’s getting red, feeling itchy, and feeling swollen, but we don’t want to stop the reaction pattern and the efficacy by undoing what we’ve created as a response.”
It may seem counterintuitive, but direct tissue cooling after PDT appears to have a negative impact on perforin conversion, “to the point where it actually reduces the efficacy and treatment when you do direct tissue cooling,” Dr. Bhatia said. One study showed found significantly less resolution of actinic keratosis (AK) lesions treated with direct tissue cooling, compared with those who did not receive tissue cooling (J Photochem Photobiol B. 2011;103:1-7). In addition, there was a failure of conversion and optimization of the accumulated protoporphyrin IX when direct tissue cooling was used.
“That’s not to say a handheld fan or a fan in the room or aerating, making sure they have enough oxygen around the treatment area [isn’t useful],” Dr. Bhatia said. “I’m talking about the direct tissue cooling that we use with the pulsed laser device, or the Zimmer cooler. You get better conversion when you have a warming device, compared with contact cooling.”
Dr. Bhatia predicted that in the future, microneedle pre-treatment of human skin is going to gain popularity as a PDT adjunct. On early study of microneedling found that it improved 5-ALA and 5-MAL–induced protoporphyrin IX production for topical photodynamic therapy without increasing pain or erythema (Pharm Res. 2010;27[10]:2213-20). “I think that’s very important,” he said.
Dr. Bhatia disclosed having affiliations with Biofrontera and Dusa, the two main manufacturers of PDT in the United States.
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. – Offering photodynamic therapy is a smart move for any dermatology practice, but also it requires common sense. That starts with making sure you treat only appropriate candidates.
“They can’t be intimidated by the thought of light or looking red, and you have to go into depth ahead of time as far as managing reactions, as well as long-term expectations,” Neal Bhatia, MD, said at the annual meeting of the Pacific Dermatologic Association. That includes reviewing any oral medications they’re taking, as well as topical products they may be using on their face or scalp.
“I like to do this treatment on Fridays so it gives patients the weekend to stay indoors for the next 48 hours, which is really what they need to optimize the response rate,” said Dr. Bhatia, director of clinical dermatology at Therapeutics Clinical Research in San Diego. “The other part of this is managing your staff. Make sure they have enough time to check in on the patients while they’re incubating away from light, as well as to review the post-treatment plan. And make sure they have a comfortable chair. Some patients might feel claustrophobic if you lay them down and put the light above them. Others might like to lay down for the procedure versus sitting down.”
His checklist for treatment day includes a reminder for patients to bring a wide-brimmed hat to shield the treated lesions from ambient light, as well as a book, computer, or paperwork to pass the time. He also advises putting together a take-home bag for patients that includes topical anesthetics, moisturizers, and sunscreen. In his clinical experience, prior to photodynamic therapy (PDT), there is no reason for patients to discontinue medications that are sensitizing in the UV spectrum such as antibiotics, diuretics, anti-hypertensives, since PDT works in the 410-417 nm range. “If you are concerned, you can hold the drugs the day before [the procedure], the day of, and maybe the day after, but that’s really all you need,” he said.
Dr. Bhatia discussed combinations with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) before and after PDT, imiquimod plus aminolevulinic acid–PDT (ALA-PDT), and ingenol mebutate plus ALA-PDT. Antihistamines may play a role in helping to reduce the anticipated ALA-PDT response (J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126[10]:2296-301). Dr. Bhatia explained that the edema component is generated by mast cell release and can be uncoupled using selected H1-antihistamines, which can provide symptom relief without compromising efficacy. “Some studies talk about reducing erythema and edema based on the presence of mast cells and the surge of mast cells within first 48 to 72 hours,” he said. “Symptomatic relief is going to mean a lot to that patient who’s getting red, feeling itchy, and feeling swollen, but we don’t want to stop the reaction pattern and the efficacy by undoing what we’ve created as a response.”
It may seem counterintuitive, but direct tissue cooling after PDT appears to have a negative impact on perforin conversion, “to the point where it actually reduces the efficacy and treatment when you do direct tissue cooling,” Dr. Bhatia said. One study showed found significantly less resolution of actinic keratosis (AK) lesions treated with direct tissue cooling, compared with those who did not receive tissue cooling (J Photochem Photobiol B. 2011;103:1-7). In addition, there was a failure of conversion and optimization of the accumulated protoporphyrin IX when direct tissue cooling was used.
“That’s not to say a handheld fan or a fan in the room or aerating, making sure they have enough oxygen around the treatment area [isn’t useful],” Dr. Bhatia said. “I’m talking about the direct tissue cooling that we use with the pulsed laser device, or the Zimmer cooler. You get better conversion when you have a warming device, compared with contact cooling.”
Dr. Bhatia predicted that in the future, microneedle pre-treatment of human skin is going to gain popularity as a PDT adjunct. On early study of microneedling found that it improved 5-ALA and 5-MAL–induced protoporphyrin IX production for topical photodynamic therapy without increasing pain or erythema (Pharm Res. 2010;27[10]:2213-20). “I think that’s very important,” he said.
Dr. Bhatia disclosed having affiliations with Biofrontera and Dusa, the two main manufacturers of PDT in the United States.
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT PDA 2016
Can Coenzyme Q10 Supplementation Benefit Patients With MSA?
Patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) have decreased levels of plasma coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), regardless of their COQ2 genotype, according to a study published in the August issue of JAMA Neurology. This finding, researchers said, supports the hypothesis that supplementation with CoQ10 is beneficial for patients with MSA.
It has been reported that functionally impaired variants of COQ2, which encodes an essential enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of CoQ10, are associated with MSA. However, little is known about blood levels of CoQ10 in patients with or without COQ2 mutations or about the role of CoQ10 in the pathogenesis of MSA.
To explore whether there are associations between levels of CoQ10 in the blood and MSA, Jun Mitsui, MD, PhD, a neurogeneticist at the University of Tokyo, and colleagues compared the levels of plasma CoQ10 in patients with MSA with those in age-, sex-, and COQ2 genotype-matched controls.
The study included 44 Japanese patients with MSA (mean age, 63.7) and, for comparison, 39 Japanese control patients (mean age, 60.3).
The authors reported that the mean plasma level of CoQ10 in patients with MSA was lower than that in controls (0.51 μg/mL vs 0.72 μg/mL). The mean plasma levels of CoQ10 in patients with the cerebellar variant of MSA and those with the parkinsonian variant of MSA were 0.58 μg/mL and 0.49 μg/mL, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and COQ2 genotype, the plasma levels of CoQ10 were significantly associated with MSA.
“Prospective cohort studies are warranted to determine the longitudinal effects of plasma levels of CoQ10 on the development of MSA. Furthermore, future clinical trials of supplementation with CoQ10 in patients with MSA are required to confirm our hypothesis,” Dr. Mitsui and colleagues said.
In an accompanying editorial, Sheng-Han Kuo, MD, and Catarina M. Quinzii, MD, both of Columbia University in New York, said, “The recent discoveries of COQ2 mutations in rare patients with MSA and of CoQ10 deficiency in the brain and blood of patients with MSA may lead to mechanism-based and rational therapies for MSA, a rapidly progressive disorder in need of a disease-modifying therapy.”
—Glenn S. Williams
Suggested Reading
Mitsui J, Matsukawa T, Yasuda T, et al. Plasma coenzyme Q10 levels in patients with multiple system atrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(8):977-980.
Kuo S-H, Quinzii CM. Coenzyme Q10 as a peripheral biomarker for multiple system atrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(8):917-919.
Patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) have decreased levels of plasma coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), regardless of their COQ2 genotype, according to a study published in the August issue of JAMA Neurology. This finding, researchers said, supports the hypothesis that supplementation with CoQ10 is beneficial for patients with MSA.
It has been reported that functionally impaired variants of COQ2, which encodes an essential enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of CoQ10, are associated with MSA. However, little is known about blood levels of CoQ10 in patients with or without COQ2 mutations or about the role of CoQ10 in the pathogenesis of MSA.
To explore whether there are associations between levels of CoQ10 in the blood and MSA, Jun Mitsui, MD, PhD, a neurogeneticist at the University of Tokyo, and colleagues compared the levels of plasma CoQ10 in patients with MSA with those in age-, sex-, and COQ2 genotype-matched controls.
The study included 44 Japanese patients with MSA (mean age, 63.7) and, for comparison, 39 Japanese control patients (mean age, 60.3).
The authors reported that the mean plasma level of CoQ10 in patients with MSA was lower than that in controls (0.51 μg/mL vs 0.72 μg/mL). The mean plasma levels of CoQ10 in patients with the cerebellar variant of MSA and those with the parkinsonian variant of MSA were 0.58 μg/mL and 0.49 μg/mL, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and COQ2 genotype, the plasma levels of CoQ10 were significantly associated with MSA.
“Prospective cohort studies are warranted to determine the longitudinal effects of plasma levels of CoQ10 on the development of MSA. Furthermore, future clinical trials of supplementation with CoQ10 in patients with MSA are required to confirm our hypothesis,” Dr. Mitsui and colleagues said.
In an accompanying editorial, Sheng-Han Kuo, MD, and Catarina M. Quinzii, MD, both of Columbia University in New York, said, “The recent discoveries of COQ2 mutations in rare patients with MSA and of CoQ10 deficiency in the brain and blood of patients with MSA may lead to mechanism-based and rational therapies for MSA, a rapidly progressive disorder in need of a disease-modifying therapy.”
—Glenn S. Williams
Patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) have decreased levels of plasma coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), regardless of their COQ2 genotype, according to a study published in the August issue of JAMA Neurology. This finding, researchers said, supports the hypothesis that supplementation with CoQ10 is beneficial for patients with MSA.
It has been reported that functionally impaired variants of COQ2, which encodes an essential enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of CoQ10, are associated with MSA. However, little is known about blood levels of CoQ10 in patients with or without COQ2 mutations or about the role of CoQ10 in the pathogenesis of MSA.
To explore whether there are associations between levels of CoQ10 in the blood and MSA, Jun Mitsui, MD, PhD, a neurogeneticist at the University of Tokyo, and colleagues compared the levels of plasma CoQ10 in patients with MSA with those in age-, sex-, and COQ2 genotype-matched controls.
The study included 44 Japanese patients with MSA (mean age, 63.7) and, for comparison, 39 Japanese control patients (mean age, 60.3).
The authors reported that the mean plasma level of CoQ10 in patients with MSA was lower than that in controls (0.51 μg/mL vs 0.72 μg/mL). The mean plasma levels of CoQ10 in patients with the cerebellar variant of MSA and those with the parkinsonian variant of MSA were 0.58 μg/mL and 0.49 μg/mL, respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, and COQ2 genotype, the plasma levels of CoQ10 were significantly associated with MSA.
“Prospective cohort studies are warranted to determine the longitudinal effects of plasma levels of CoQ10 on the development of MSA. Furthermore, future clinical trials of supplementation with CoQ10 in patients with MSA are required to confirm our hypothesis,” Dr. Mitsui and colleagues said.
In an accompanying editorial, Sheng-Han Kuo, MD, and Catarina M. Quinzii, MD, both of Columbia University in New York, said, “The recent discoveries of COQ2 mutations in rare patients with MSA and of CoQ10 deficiency in the brain and blood of patients with MSA may lead to mechanism-based and rational therapies for MSA, a rapidly progressive disorder in need of a disease-modifying therapy.”
—Glenn S. Williams
Suggested Reading
Mitsui J, Matsukawa T, Yasuda T, et al. Plasma coenzyme Q10 levels in patients with multiple system atrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(8):977-980.
Kuo S-H, Quinzii CM. Coenzyme Q10 as a peripheral biomarker for multiple system atrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(8):917-919.
Suggested Reading
Mitsui J, Matsukawa T, Yasuda T, et al. Plasma coenzyme Q10 levels in patients with multiple system atrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(8):977-980.
Kuo S-H, Quinzii CM. Coenzyme Q10 as a peripheral biomarker for multiple system atrophy. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(8):917-919.
DDSEP® 8: Everything you need to succeed
Trusted by GIs for more than 15 years, the Digestive Diseases Self-Education Program® (DDSEP), which is now in its eighth edition, builds upon prior success by incorporating a number of innovations and adaptations to deliver a diverse and highly engaging learning platform.
You can tailor your learning experience as you see fit with our app-based format and flexible options.
What’s new?
• Web and app based – Learn at your computer or on-the-go with your smart device. When and how you learn is up to you.
• Mock exams – Evaluate your exam readiness with American Board of Internal Medicine–style mock exams, each with 60 questions.
• Enhanced flexibility – Access all resources with DDSEP 8 Complete or customize your learning by purchasing individual chapters, questions only, or mock exams.
To purchase and learn more, visit the DDSEP 8 website.
Trusted by GIs for more than 15 years, the Digestive Diseases Self-Education Program® (DDSEP), which is now in its eighth edition, builds upon prior success by incorporating a number of innovations and adaptations to deliver a diverse and highly engaging learning platform.
You can tailor your learning experience as you see fit with our app-based format and flexible options.
What’s new?
• Web and app based – Learn at your computer or on-the-go with your smart device. When and how you learn is up to you.
• Mock exams – Evaluate your exam readiness with American Board of Internal Medicine–style mock exams, each with 60 questions.
• Enhanced flexibility – Access all resources with DDSEP 8 Complete or customize your learning by purchasing individual chapters, questions only, or mock exams.
To purchase and learn more, visit the DDSEP 8 website.
Trusted by GIs for more than 15 years, the Digestive Diseases Self-Education Program® (DDSEP), which is now in its eighth edition, builds upon prior success by incorporating a number of innovations and adaptations to deliver a diverse and highly engaging learning platform.
You can tailor your learning experience as you see fit with our app-based format and flexible options.
What’s new?
• Web and app based – Learn at your computer or on-the-go with your smart device. When and how you learn is up to you.
• Mock exams – Evaluate your exam readiness with American Board of Internal Medicine–style mock exams, each with 60 questions.
• Enhanced flexibility – Access all resources with DDSEP 8 Complete or customize your learning by purchasing individual chapters, questions only, or mock exams.
To purchase and learn more, visit the DDSEP 8 website.