User login
Surgical treatment tops medical management of prosthetic valve endocarditis
NEW ORLEANS – Over the years patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis treated at Cleveland Clinic tended to fare better with surgery compared to medical management, some clinicians noted. However, there was no data to confirm their observations.
“It was not recognized widely. A lot of our colleagues continued to believe it could be adequately treated with the right antibiotic,” Nabin K. Shrestha, MD, said at the IDWeek 2016 annual meeting on infectious diseases.
So Dr Shrestha and his colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare outcomes between 253 surgically treated adults and 77 others treated medically between April 2008 and December 2012. Survival from the time of treatment decision was the primary outcome.
The groups differed on some demographic and clinical factors. For example, the medically treated group was older, had fewer men, and more patients with mitral valves. “We might think the medical patients might be too sick for surgery, and that could certainly be true, but … they could have been too well for surgery too,” Dr. Shrestha said. To control for these differences between groups, the investigators performed a number of statistical analyses, including a propensity score adjusted model and reduced Cox proportion hazards model.
“Patients with PVE have a high hazard of death if treated medically,” Dr. Shrestha said, based on a 6.68 hazard ratio. The higher risk of death associated with medical treatment remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, and other factors. “Compared to surgical treatment, medical treatment was associated with a seven-fold higher hazard of death overall,” Dr. Shrestha said at the combined annual meetings of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, the HIV Medicine Association, and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.
The medical treatment group also fared worse on a number of secondary outcomes. For example, this group had a five-fold higher risk of death during hospitalization compared to the surgery group (odds ratio, 4.65); a 12-fold higher risk of death within one year (OR, 11.70); a seven-fold higher risk of subsequent surgery for infective endocarditis (OR, 6.57); and an eight-fold higher odds of surgery for the same episode of infective endocarditis at a subsequent hospitalization (OR, 8.02).
A large sample size and setting the date of management decision as time zero to avoid survival selection bias “give us confidence in our findings.” Limitations include an inability to look at some important variables because of the retrospective design.
A meeting attendee commented that surgeons often request a patient be optimized medically prior to surgery, and asked if investigators looked at time from hospitalization to the operation.
“The median date from admission to surgery was six days in our database,” said Dr. Shrestha, who is a staff physician at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
“Medical treatment overall is associated with significantly poorer outcomes in patients with PVE compared with surgical treatment,” Dr. Shrestha said. “Although some patients are not candidates for surgery, a definite diagnosis of PVE should prompt a surgical evaluation in the majority of patients.”
Dr. Shrestha reported having no disclosures.
NEW ORLEANS – Over the years patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis treated at Cleveland Clinic tended to fare better with surgery compared to medical management, some clinicians noted. However, there was no data to confirm their observations.
“It was not recognized widely. A lot of our colleagues continued to believe it could be adequately treated with the right antibiotic,” Nabin K. Shrestha, MD, said at the IDWeek 2016 annual meeting on infectious diseases.
So Dr Shrestha and his colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare outcomes between 253 surgically treated adults and 77 others treated medically between April 2008 and December 2012. Survival from the time of treatment decision was the primary outcome.
The groups differed on some demographic and clinical factors. For example, the medically treated group was older, had fewer men, and more patients with mitral valves. “We might think the medical patients might be too sick for surgery, and that could certainly be true, but … they could have been too well for surgery too,” Dr. Shrestha said. To control for these differences between groups, the investigators performed a number of statistical analyses, including a propensity score adjusted model and reduced Cox proportion hazards model.
“Patients with PVE have a high hazard of death if treated medically,” Dr. Shrestha said, based on a 6.68 hazard ratio. The higher risk of death associated with medical treatment remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, and other factors. “Compared to surgical treatment, medical treatment was associated with a seven-fold higher hazard of death overall,” Dr. Shrestha said at the combined annual meetings of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, the HIV Medicine Association, and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.
The medical treatment group also fared worse on a number of secondary outcomes. For example, this group had a five-fold higher risk of death during hospitalization compared to the surgery group (odds ratio, 4.65); a 12-fold higher risk of death within one year (OR, 11.70); a seven-fold higher risk of subsequent surgery for infective endocarditis (OR, 6.57); and an eight-fold higher odds of surgery for the same episode of infective endocarditis at a subsequent hospitalization (OR, 8.02).
A large sample size and setting the date of management decision as time zero to avoid survival selection bias “give us confidence in our findings.” Limitations include an inability to look at some important variables because of the retrospective design.
A meeting attendee commented that surgeons often request a patient be optimized medically prior to surgery, and asked if investigators looked at time from hospitalization to the operation.
“The median date from admission to surgery was six days in our database,” said Dr. Shrestha, who is a staff physician at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
“Medical treatment overall is associated with significantly poorer outcomes in patients with PVE compared with surgical treatment,” Dr. Shrestha said. “Although some patients are not candidates for surgery, a definite diagnosis of PVE should prompt a surgical evaluation in the majority of patients.”
Dr. Shrestha reported having no disclosures.
NEW ORLEANS – Over the years patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis treated at Cleveland Clinic tended to fare better with surgery compared to medical management, some clinicians noted. However, there was no data to confirm their observations.
“It was not recognized widely. A lot of our colleagues continued to believe it could be adequately treated with the right antibiotic,” Nabin K. Shrestha, MD, said at the IDWeek 2016 annual meeting on infectious diseases.
So Dr Shrestha and his colleagues conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare outcomes between 253 surgically treated adults and 77 others treated medically between April 2008 and December 2012. Survival from the time of treatment decision was the primary outcome.
The groups differed on some demographic and clinical factors. For example, the medically treated group was older, had fewer men, and more patients with mitral valves. “We might think the medical patients might be too sick for surgery, and that could certainly be true, but … they could have been too well for surgery too,” Dr. Shrestha said. To control for these differences between groups, the investigators performed a number of statistical analyses, including a propensity score adjusted model and reduced Cox proportion hazards model.
“Patients with PVE have a high hazard of death if treated medically,” Dr. Shrestha said, based on a 6.68 hazard ratio. The higher risk of death associated with medical treatment remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, and other factors. “Compared to surgical treatment, medical treatment was associated with a seven-fold higher hazard of death overall,” Dr. Shrestha said at the combined annual meetings of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America, the HIV Medicine Association, and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society.
The medical treatment group also fared worse on a number of secondary outcomes. For example, this group had a five-fold higher risk of death during hospitalization compared to the surgery group (odds ratio, 4.65); a 12-fold higher risk of death within one year (OR, 11.70); a seven-fold higher risk of subsequent surgery for infective endocarditis (OR, 6.57); and an eight-fold higher odds of surgery for the same episode of infective endocarditis at a subsequent hospitalization (OR, 8.02).
A large sample size and setting the date of management decision as time zero to avoid survival selection bias “give us confidence in our findings.” Limitations include an inability to look at some important variables because of the retrospective design.
A meeting attendee commented that surgeons often request a patient be optimized medically prior to surgery, and asked if investigators looked at time from hospitalization to the operation.
“The median date from admission to surgery was six days in our database,” said Dr. Shrestha, who is a staff physician at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
“Medical treatment overall is associated with significantly poorer outcomes in patients with PVE compared with surgical treatment,” Dr. Shrestha said. “Although some patients are not candidates for surgery, a definite diagnosis of PVE should prompt a surgical evaluation in the majority of patients.”
Dr. Shrestha reported having no disclosures.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Compared to surgery, odds of death within one year higher were almost 7 times greater with medical treatment (hazard ratio, 6.68).
Data source: Presentation at IDWeek 2016
Disclosures: Dr. Nabin K. Shrestha had no relevant disclosures.
Homeless youth and risk: Untangling role of executive function
NEW YORK – Researchers studying the executive functioning ability of homeless youth have found that individuals with poor executive function report more alcohol abuse and dependence than do those with higher EF.
The results are from a study of 149 youth aged 18-22 years (53% female) living in shelters in Chicago. Subjects self-reported behaviors in a series of interviews that used three validated measures of executive function.
Scott J. Hunter, Ph.D., director of neuropsychology at the University of Chicago, presented the findings at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Dr. Hunter said in an interview that the results help identify low executive functioning as both a likely contributor to risk-taking behavior and a potential target of interventions.
“We believe that the EF may be the primary concern, although the interaction [with drugs and alcohol] is something that we have to take into account,” he said. “One of the biggest issues here is how do you disentangle that executive piece with the use of substances?”
In this cohort, Dr. Hunter said, about 75% of subjects were African American and an additional 25% or so were mixed race or Latino. About half comprised a sexual minority (gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender). “Many had been kicked out of their homes,” he said.
Close to 80% of the youth in the study used cannabis regularly, and three-quarters used alcohol. The group with low EF used the greatest level of substances regularly. Admission of unprotected sexual intercourse was highest among the heavier substance users as well, suggesting “a reliance on substances to reduce sensitivity to the risks they were taking,” said Dr. Hunter, also a professor in the departments of psychiatry and behavioral neuroscience, and pediatrics at the university.
He said the study “is providing some support for our hypothesis that the less successful these young people are in their development of EF, particularly around inhibition, the more likely it is they are going to be engaging in risk-taking behaviors that lead to cycles of more challenge” and development of psychopathology.
The researchers are considering an intervention for this population derived from EF interventions for use with adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In their current shelter environments, he said, the youth are “already undergoing programs to learn adaptive functioning to be more successful, and we’re thinking of adding an executive component where they tie the decision-making component to what they want as outcomes.”
The prefrontal cortex of the brain, which controls executive function, is not yet fully developed in adolescence, and studies have shown that youth growing up in impoverished environments have decreases or alterations in cortical development (Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 17;6:238). “What we have to think about is that we’re still at a [developmental] point where this enhancement and myelination is taking place – into the mid-20s, in fact. We may find that [an intervention] can help them better activate that,” Dr. Hunter said.
The lead author on this study was Joshua Piche, a medical student at the University of Chicago.
Dr. Hunter also is collaborating with epidemiologist John Schneider, MD, MPH, of the University of Chicago, in a study of 600 young black men who have sex with men. The researchers are looking at drug-, alcohol-related, and sexual decision-making in that cohort, about a quarter of whom are homeless. The study includes functional magnetic resonance imaging in a subgroup of subjects.
Currently, as many as 2 million U.S. youth are estimated to be living on the streets, in shelters, or in other temporary housing environments.
NEW YORK – Researchers studying the executive functioning ability of homeless youth have found that individuals with poor executive function report more alcohol abuse and dependence than do those with higher EF.
The results are from a study of 149 youth aged 18-22 years (53% female) living in shelters in Chicago. Subjects self-reported behaviors in a series of interviews that used three validated measures of executive function.
Scott J. Hunter, Ph.D., director of neuropsychology at the University of Chicago, presented the findings at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Dr. Hunter said in an interview that the results help identify low executive functioning as both a likely contributor to risk-taking behavior and a potential target of interventions.
“We believe that the EF may be the primary concern, although the interaction [with drugs and alcohol] is something that we have to take into account,” he said. “One of the biggest issues here is how do you disentangle that executive piece with the use of substances?”
In this cohort, Dr. Hunter said, about 75% of subjects were African American and an additional 25% or so were mixed race or Latino. About half comprised a sexual minority (gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender). “Many had been kicked out of their homes,” he said.
Close to 80% of the youth in the study used cannabis regularly, and three-quarters used alcohol. The group with low EF used the greatest level of substances regularly. Admission of unprotected sexual intercourse was highest among the heavier substance users as well, suggesting “a reliance on substances to reduce sensitivity to the risks they were taking,” said Dr. Hunter, also a professor in the departments of psychiatry and behavioral neuroscience, and pediatrics at the university.
He said the study “is providing some support for our hypothesis that the less successful these young people are in their development of EF, particularly around inhibition, the more likely it is they are going to be engaging in risk-taking behaviors that lead to cycles of more challenge” and development of psychopathology.
The researchers are considering an intervention for this population derived from EF interventions for use with adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In their current shelter environments, he said, the youth are “already undergoing programs to learn adaptive functioning to be more successful, and we’re thinking of adding an executive component where they tie the decision-making component to what they want as outcomes.”
The prefrontal cortex of the brain, which controls executive function, is not yet fully developed in adolescence, and studies have shown that youth growing up in impoverished environments have decreases or alterations in cortical development (Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 17;6:238). “What we have to think about is that we’re still at a [developmental] point where this enhancement and myelination is taking place – into the mid-20s, in fact. We may find that [an intervention] can help them better activate that,” Dr. Hunter said.
The lead author on this study was Joshua Piche, a medical student at the University of Chicago.
Dr. Hunter also is collaborating with epidemiologist John Schneider, MD, MPH, of the University of Chicago, in a study of 600 young black men who have sex with men. The researchers are looking at drug-, alcohol-related, and sexual decision-making in that cohort, about a quarter of whom are homeless. The study includes functional magnetic resonance imaging in a subgroup of subjects.
Currently, as many as 2 million U.S. youth are estimated to be living on the streets, in shelters, or in other temporary housing environments.
NEW YORK – Researchers studying the executive functioning ability of homeless youth have found that individuals with poor executive function report more alcohol abuse and dependence than do those with higher EF.
The results are from a study of 149 youth aged 18-22 years (53% female) living in shelters in Chicago. Subjects self-reported behaviors in a series of interviews that used three validated measures of executive function.
Scott J. Hunter, Ph.D., director of neuropsychology at the University of Chicago, presented the findings at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Dr. Hunter said in an interview that the results help identify low executive functioning as both a likely contributor to risk-taking behavior and a potential target of interventions.
“We believe that the EF may be the primary concern, although the interaction [with drugs and alcohol] is something that we have to take into account,” he said. “One of the biggest issues here is how do you disentangle that executive piece with the use of substances?”
In this cohort, Dr. Hunter said, about 75% of subjects were African American and an additional 25% or so were mixed race or Latino. About half comprised a sexual minority (gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender). “Many had been kicked out of their homes,” he said.
Close to 80% of the youth in the study used cannabis regularly, and three-quarters used alcohol. The group with low EF used the greatest level of substances regularly. Admission of unprotected sexual intercourse was highest among the heavier substance users as well, suggesting “a reliance on substances to reduce sensitivity to the risks they were taking,” said Dr. Hunter, also a professor in the departments of psychiatry and behavioral neuroscience, and pediatrics at the university.
He said the study “is providing some support for our hypothesis that the less successful these young people are in their development of EF, particularly around inhibition, the more likely it is they are going to be engaging in risk-taking behaviors that lead to cycles of more challenge” and development of psychopathology.
The researchers are considering an intervention for this population derived from EF interventions for use with adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In their current shelter environments, he said, the youth are “already undergoing programs to learn adaptive functioning to be more successful, and we’re thinking of adding an executive component where they tie the decision-making component to what they want as outcomes.”
The prefrontal cortex of the brain, which controls executive function, is not yet fully developed in adolescence, and studies have shown that youth growing up in impoverished environments have decreases or alterations in cortical development (Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Aug 17;6:238). “What we have to think about is that we’re still at a [developmental] point where this enhancement and myelination is taking place – into the mid-20s, in fact. We may find that [an intervention] can help them better activate that,” Dr. Hunter said.
The lead author on this study was Joshua Piche, a medical student at the University of Chicago.
Dr. Hunter also is collaborating with epidemiologist John Schneider, MD, MPH, of the University of Chicago, in a study of 600 young black men who have sex with men. The researchers are looking at drug-, alcohol-related, and sexual decision-making in that cohort, about a quarter of whom are homeless. The study includes functional magnetic resonance imaging in a subgroup of subjects.
Currently, as many as 2 million U.S. youth are estimated to be living on the streets, in shelters, or in other temporary housing environments.
Mediterranean diet for secondary prevention cuts all-cause mortality
ROME – Adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet by patients with known heart or cerebrovascular disease was independently linked with a marked reduction in their risk of all-cause mortality in the Italian Moli-Sani Study, Giovanni de Gaetano, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
Subjects in the top tertile in terms of food intake consistent with the Mediterranean diet were 37% less likely to die during more than 7 years of follow-up than were those in the bottom tertile, according to Dr. de Gaetano, head of the department of epidemiology and prevention at the IRCCS Mediterranean Neurologic Institute in Pozzilli, Italy.
The Moli-Sani Study is an ongoing population-based epidemiologic study of 25,000 adults in the mountainous, heavily agricultural Molise region of southern Italy. Dr. de Gaetano, who directs the study, presented a substudy involving 1,197 participants with established coronary heart disease or cerebrovascular disease at entry. Their average age at enrollment was 66 years. Subjects with coronary heart disease outnumbered those with cerebrovascular disease by roughly 2:1.
Food intake was recorded using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC) food-frequency questionnaire. Dr. de Gaetano and his coinvestigators assessed adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet using the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), a validated 0-9 scoring system developed as part of the famous Seven Countries Study pioneered by the late Ancel Keys.
During a median 7.3 years of prospective follow-up, 208 deaths occurred in the study population. A 2-point increase in the MDS was independently associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of mortality in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for “everything we could think of,” according to Dr. de Gaetano, including baseline demographics, socioeconomic status, energy intake, body mass index, leisure time physical activity, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking status, diabetes, standard cardiovascular risk factors, and use of cardiovascular medications.
Subjects in the top tertile for adherence to the Mediterranean diet, with an MDS of 6-9, had an adjusted 37% relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality, compared with those having an MDS of 0-3.
The number of deaths is too small at this point in the prospective study to permit analysis of specific causes of death in a statistically valid manner. With another 3 years or so of follow-up, that analysis can and will be done, Dr. de Gaetano said.
The traditional Mediterranean diet is an eating pattern characteristic of the Mediterranean basin, he explained. It encourages large intake of vegetables, legumes, fruits, nuts, and cereals, along with moderately high consumption of fish, olive oil as the primary fat source, and moderate alcohol intake during meals, but low-to-moderate intake of dairy products and low consumption of meat and poultry.
As a sobering aside, he said that in the Molise region, far and away the biggest obstacle to adherence to the Mediterranean diet is economic.
“There was no difference in adherence to the Mediterranean diet between different socioeconomic classes in the Moli-Sani Study until 2007-2008, when the Italian economic crisis began. Since then there are significant differences according to socioeconomic condition. Poor people are obliged to follow the Mediterranean diet less,” Dr. de Gaetano said.
Telling a patient with cardiovascular disease who is in a low-income family of four to eat fish at least twice per week is impractical advice, he explained.
The ongoing Moli-Sani Study is funded by the Italian government. Dr. de Gaetano reported having no financial conflicts of interest.
ROME – Adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet by patients with known heart or cerebrovascular disease was independently linked with a marked reduction in their risk of all-cause mortality in the Italian Moli-Sani Study, Giovanni de Gaetano, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
Subjects in the top tertile in terms of food intake consistent with the Mediterranean diet were 37% less likely to die during more than 7 years of follow-up than were those in the bottom tertile, according to Dr. de Gaetano, head of the department of epidemiology and prevention at the IRCCS Mediterranean Neurologic Institute in Pozzilli, Italy.
The Moli-Sani Study is an ongoing population-based epidemiologic study of 25,000 adults in the mountainous, heavily agricultural Molise region of southern Italy. Dr. de Gaetano, who directs the study, presented a substudy involving 1,197 participants with established coronary heart disease or cerebrovascular disease at entry. Their average age at enrollment was 66 years. Subjects with coronary heart disease outnumbered those with cerebrovascular disease by roughly 2:1.
Food intake was recorded using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC) food-frequency questionnaire. Dr. de Gaetano and his coinvestigators assessed adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet using the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), a validated 0-9 scoring system developed as part of the famous Seven Countries Study pioneered by the late Ancel Keys.
During a median 7.3 years of prospective follow-up, 208 deaths occurred in the study population. A 2-point increase in the MDS was independently associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of mortality in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for “everything we could think of,” according to Dr. de Gaetano, including baseline demographics, socioeconomic status, energy intake, body mass index, leisure time physical activity, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking status, diabetes, standard cardiovascular risk factors, and use of cardiovascular medications.
Subjects in the top tertile for adherence to the Mediterranean diet, with an MDS of 6-9, had an adjusted 37% relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality, compared with those having an MDS of 0-3.
The number of deaths is too small at this point in the prospective study to permit analysis of specific causes of death in a statistically valid manner. With another 3 years or so of follow-up, that analysis can and will be done, Dr. de Gaetano said.
The traditional Mediterranean diet is an eating pattern characteristic of the Mediterranean basin, he explained. It encourages large intake of vegetables, legumes, fruits, nuts, and cereals, along with moderately high consumption of fish, olive oil as the primary fat source, and moderate alcohol intake during meals, but low-to-moderate intake of dairy products and low consumption of meat and poultry.
As a sobering aside, he said that in the Molise region, far and away the biggest obstacle to adherence to the Mediterranean diet is economic.
“There was no difference in adherence to the Mediterranean diet between different socioeconomic classes in the Moli-Sani Study until 2007-2008, when the Italian economic crisis began. Since then there are significant differences according to socioeconomic condition. Poor people are obliged to follow the Mediterranean diet less,” Dr. de Gaetano said.
Telling a patient with cardiovascular disease who is in a low-income family of four to eat fish at least twice per week is impractical advice, he explained.
The ongoing Moli-Sani Study is funded by the Italian government. Dr. de Gaetano reported having no financial conflicts of interest.
ROME – Adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet by patients with known heart or cerebrovascular disease was independently linked with a marked reduction in their risk of all-cause mortality in the Italian Moli-Sani Study, Giovanni de Gaetano, MD, reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
Subjects in the top tertile in terms of food intake consistent with the Mediterranean diet were 37% less likely to die during more than 7 years of follow-up than were those in the bottom tertile, according to Dr. de Gaetano, head of the department of epidemiology and prevention at the IRCCS Mediterranean Neurologic Institute in Pozzilli, Italy.
The Moli-Sani Study is an ongoing population-based epidemiologic study of 25,000 adults in the mountainous, heavily agricultural Molise region of southern Italy. Dr. de Gaetano, who directs the study, presented a substudy involving 1,197 participants with established coronary heart disease or cerebrovascular disease at entry. Their average age at enrollment was 66 years. Subjects with coronary heart disease outnumbered those with cerebrovascular disease by roughly 2:1.
Food intake was recorded using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC) food-frequency questionnaire. Dr. de Gaetano and his coinvestigators assessed adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet using the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS), a validated 0-9 scoring system developed as part of the famous Seven Countries Study pioneered by the late Ancel Keys.
During a median 7.3 years of prospective follow-up, 208 deaths occurred in the study population. A 2-point increase in the MDS was independently associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of mortality in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for “everything we could think of,” according to Dr. de Gaetano, including baseline demographics, socioeconomic status, energy intake, body mass index, leisure time physical activity, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking status, diabetes, standard cardiovascular risk factors, and use of cardiovascular medications.
Subjects in the top tertile for adherence to the Mediterranean diet, with an MDS of 6-9, had an adjusted 37% relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality, compared with those having an MDS of 0-3.
The number of deaths is too small at this point in the prospective study to permit analysis of specific causes of death in a statistically valid manner. With another 3 years or so of follow-up, that analysis can and will be done, Dr. de Gaetano said.
The traditional Mediterranean diet is an eating pattern characteristic of the Mediterranean basin, he explained. It encourages large intake of vegetables, legumes, fruits, nuts, and cereals, along with moderately high consumption of fish, olive oil as the primary fat source, and moderate alcohol intake during meals, but low-to-moderate intake of dairy products and low consumption of meat and poultry.
As a sobering aside, he said that in the Molise region, far and away the biggest obstacle to adherence to the Mediterranean diet is economic.
“There was no difference in adherence to the Mediterranean diet between different socioeconomic classes in the Moli-Sani Study until 2007-2008, when the Italian economic crisis began. Since then there are significant differences according to socioeconomic condition. Poor people are obliged to follow the Mediterranean diet less,” Dr. de Gaetano said.
Telling a patient with cardiovascular disease who is in a low-income family of four to eat fish at least twice per week is impractical advice, he explained.
The ongoing Moli-Sani Study is funded by the Italian government. Dr. de Gaetano reported having no financial conflicts of interest.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Italian patients with known cardiovascular disease who were in the top third in terms of adherence to the traditional Mediterranean diet were a fully adjusted 37% less likely to die of any cause during follow-up than those in the bottom tertile.
Data source: This substudy of the prospective, observational Italian Moli-Sani Study included 1,197 participants with coronary heart disease or cerebrovascular disease at baseline who were followed for a median of 7.3 years.
Disclosures: The ongoing Moli-Sani Study is funded by the Italian government. The presenter reported having no financial conflicts of interest.
Recognizing anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis psychosis on the psych ward
VIENNA – Prominent psychiatric symptoms are common in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-asparate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis and often occur prior to onset of obvious neurologic symptoms, Maarten J. Titulaer, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
Moreover, occasionally the psychiatric symptoms occur in isolation without neurologic involvement, as was the case in 4% of a series of 501 patients with confirmed anti-NMDAR encephalitis reported by Dr. Titulaer and coinvestigators. The most prominent symptoms included delusional thinking, aggression, and mood disturbances, which were usually manic (JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70[9]:1133-9).
Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which autoantibodies directed at NMDA receptors on neuronal plasma membranes induce severe neurologic and often psychiatric symptoms.
Red flags that raise the chance that a patient on the psychiatric ward with new-onset psychosis or mania might have primary anti-NMDAR encephalitis and should undergo diagnostic testing include autonomic disturbances such as tachycardia, fever, or hypertension, mild neurologic symptoms such as facial twitching, as well as catatonia, seizures, mutism, or development of extrapyramidal symptoms when placed on an antipsychotic agent. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis can have a relapsing course, so any behavioral change in a patient with a history of the disorder might signal relapse.
Certain cancers are strongly associated with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. New-onset psychotic or manic patients with a history of ovarian teratoma, small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, or thymoma should be tested for anti-NMDAR encephalitis. And conversely, screening for those tumors in occult form is warranted in patients with confirmed anti-NMDAR encephalitis, according to Dr. Titulaer.
Systematic screening for anti-NMDAR encephalitis should also be considered in women with severe acute psychosis during the postpartum period, particularly in the setting of extrapyramidal side effects of antipsychotic agents. Two of 96 consecutive women with acute-onset postpartum psychosis in a series reported by Dr. Titulaer and colleagues were antibody-positive for the disorder, and neither had an ovarian teratoma (Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 1;172[9]:901-8).
If a patient hasn’t developed neurologic symptoms within 4 weeks after onset of psychiatric symptoms, anti-NMDAR psychosis becomes far less likely.
Some neurologists have suggested the presence of other autoimmune disorders in psychiatric patients is associated with increased likelihood that the psychiatric symptoms are secondary to anti-NMDAR encephalitis, but Dr. Titulaer doesn’t find the evidence to date persuasive.
The diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis hinges on the finding of IgG antibodies against the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR. But Dr. Titulaer and coinvestigators have shown there are testing pitfalls: The first-line commercially available cell-based serum assays have a sensitivity of roughly 75% along with 97%-99% specificity, so by relying solely on the cell-based assays a physician might miss one in four cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis and wrongly diagnose the disease in 0.4%-3% of healthy individuals (Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13[2]:167-77).
For this reason, a positive serum test should be confirmed by a cell-based assay of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, which has 100% sensitivity and specificity. And if the serum assay is negative but anti-NMDAR is suspected based on clinical grounds or history, go ahead and test the CSF, the neurologist advised.
Other tools that can be helpful in making the diagnosis include the EEG, which is abnormal in 89% of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Thirty percent of affected patients will display a highly specific EEG abnormality called extreme delta brushes (Neurology. 2012 Sep 11;79[11]:1094-100).
Dr. Titulaer said that this extreme delta brushes pattern is not seen on the regular psychiatry ward, but only in the ICU, when the patient is severely ill. He has yet to see the first convincing extreme delta brushes pattern in a patient outside the ICU.
Brain MRI has proved “very disappointing,” as it’s abnormal in only one-third of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, he continued.
First-line immunotherapy is corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and/or intravenous immunoglobulin. In a series of 501 patients who received first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, 53% improved within 4 weeks. Fifty-seven percent of those who didn’t then got second-line immunotherapy with rituximab (Rituxan) or cyclophosphamide. Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months following symptom onset. At 24 months of follow-up, just over 80% of patients in this observational study had a good outcome as defined by a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2, meaning they were living independently with no or minimal disability.
“Not bad, especially considering that the patients who didn’t improve on first-line therapy were in the ICU for a median of 6 weeks,” the neurologist observed.
“It’s important to diagnose patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis,” he stressed. “Treatment might be difficult. You might need to be very aggressive. But in the end there are very good outcomes. It’s very rewarding to treat these patients.”
In multivariate analysis, Dr. Titulaer and coworkers identified earlier treatment and milder illness as reflected in no ICU admission as significant predictors of good outcome in the study population. Also, the use of second-line immunotherapy in nonresponders to first-line therapy was independently associated with a 2.69-fold increased likelihood of good outcome (Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12[2]:157-65).
Twelve percent of patients experienced one or more relapses within 2 years.
In a separate study of 661 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, only 31 were aged 45 years or older. They had less severe disease than the younger adults but a paradoxically worse outcome, possibly because their median time to diagnosis was twice as long. At 2 years, 60% of the patients aged 45 and up had full or substantial recovery (Neurology. 2013 Sep 17;81[12]:1058-63).
He stressed that treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitis ought to be an interdisciplinary effort. Psychiatrists will typically not be the ones who administer the potent immunotherapy. But most patients will have behavioral problems in the very early and late phases that warrant psychiatric therapy. Dr. Titulaer suggested psychiatrists steer clear of haloperidol in these patients because it can exacerbate motor symptoms.
Asked if there are any specific patterns of movement disorders linked to anti-NMDAR encephalitis that might raise a psychiatrist’s index of suspicion, the neurologist replied no. Almost all the movement disorders have been seen in psychiatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The one specific movement disorder that strongly suggests anti-NMDAR encephalitis is post–herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis choreoathetosis. It appears that HSV encephalitis can trigger formation of NMDAR autoantibodies, resulting in onset of choreoathetosis 3-6 weeks after the HSV encephalopathy.
Dr. Titulaer reported having no financial conflicts of interest in regard to his presentation.
*This story was updated 1/26/2017.
VIENNA – Prominent psychiatric symptoms are common in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-asparate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis and often occur prior to onset of obvious neurologic symptoms, Maarten J. Titulaer, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
Moreover, occasionally the psychiatric symptoms occur in isolation without neurologic involvement, as was the case in 4% of a series of 501 patients with confirmed anti-NMDAR encephalitis reported by Dr. Titulaer and coinvestigators. The most prominent symptoms included delusional thinking, aggression, and mood disturbances, which were usually manic (JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70[9]:1133-9).
Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which autoantibodies directed at NMDA receptors on neuronal plasma membranes induce severe neurologic and often psychiatric symptoms.
Red flags that raise the chance that a patient on the psychiatric ward with new-onset psychosis or mania might have primary anti-NMDAR encephalitis and should undergo diagnostic testing include autonomic disturbances such as tachycardia, fever, or hypertension, mild neurologic symptoms such as facial twitching, as well as catatonia, seizures, mutism, or development of extrapyramidal symptoms when placed on an antipsychotic agent. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis can have a relapsing course, so any behavioral change in a patient with a history of the disorder might signal relapse.
Certain cancers are strongly associated with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. New-onset psychotic or manic patients with a history of ovarian teratoma, small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, or thymoma should be tested for anti-NMDAR encephalitis. And conversely, screening for those tumors in occult form is warranted in patients with confirmed anti-NMDAR encephalitis, according to Dr. Titulaer.
Systematic screening for anti-NMDAR encephalitis should also be considered in women with severe acute psychosis during the postpartum period, particularly in the setting of extrapyramidal side effects of antipsychotic agents. Two of 96 consecutive women with acute-onset postpartum psychosis in a series reported by Dr. Titulaer and colleagues were antibody-positive for the disorder, and neither had an ovarian teratoma (Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 1;172[9]:901-8).
If a patient hasn’t developed neurologic symptoms within 4 weeks after onset of psychiatric symptoms, anti-NMDAR psychosis becomes far less likely.
Some neurologists have suggested the presence of other autoimmune disorders in psychiatric patients is associated with increased likelihood that the psychiatric symptoms are secondary to anti-NMDAR encephalitis, but Dr. Titulaer doesn’t find the evidence to date persuasive.
The diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis hinges on the finding of IgG antibodies against the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR. But Dr. Titulaer and coinvestigators have shown there are testing pitfalls: The first-line commercially available cell-based serum assays have a sensitivity of roughly 75% along with 97%-99% specificity, so by relying solely on the cell-based assays a physician might miss one in four cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis and wrongly diagnose the disease in 0.4%-3% of healthy individuals (Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13[2]:167-77).
For this reason, a positive serum test should be confirmed by a cell-based assay of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, which has 100% sensitivity and specificity. And if the serum assay is negative but anti-NMDAR is suspected based on clinical grounds or history, go ahead and test the CSF, the neurologist advised.
Other tools that can be helpful in making the diagnosis include the EEG, which is abnormal in 89% of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Thirty percent of affected patients will display a highly specific EEG abnormality called extreme delta brushes (Neurology. 2012 Sep 11;79[11]:1094-100).
Dr. Titulaer said that this extreme delta brushes pattern is not seen on the regular psychiatry ward, but only in the ICU, when the patient is severely ill. He has yet to see the first convincing extreme delta brushes pattern in a patient outside the ICU.
Brain MRI has proved “very disappointing,” as it’s abnormal in only one-third of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, he continued.
First-line immunotherapy is corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and/or intravenous immunoglobulin. In a series of 501 patients who received first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, 53% improved within 4 weeks. Fifty-seven percent of those who didn’t then got second-line immunotherapy with rituximab (Rituxan) or cyclophosphamide. Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months following symptom onset. At 24 months of follow-up, just over 80% of patients in this observational study had a good outcome as defined by a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2, meaning they were living independently with no or minimal disability.
“Not bad, especially considering that the patients who didn’t improve on first-line therapy were in the ICU for a median of 6 weeks,” the neurologist observed.
“It’s important to diagnose patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis,” he stressed. “Treatment might be difficult. You might need to be very aggressive. But in the end there are very good outcomes. It’s very rewarding to treat these patients.”
In multivariate analysis, Dr. Titulaer and coworkers identified earlier treatment and milder illness as reflected in no ICU admission as significant predictors of good outcome in the study population. Also, the use of second-line immunotherapy in nonresponders to first-line therapy was independently associated with a 2.69-fold increased likelihood of good outcome (Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12[2]:157-65).
Twelve percent of patients experienced one or more relapses within 2 years.
In a separate study of 661 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, only 31 were aged 45 years or older. They had less severe disease than the younger adults but a paradoxically worse outcome, possibly because their median time to diagnosis was twice as long. At 2 years, 60% of the patients aged 45 and up had full or substantial recovery (Neurology. 2013 Sep 17;81[12]:1058-63).
He stressed that treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitis ought to be an interdisciplinary effort. Psychiatrists will typically not be the ones who administer the potent immunotherapy. But most patients will have behavioral problems in the very early and late phases that warrant psychiatric therapy. Dr. Titulaer suggested psychiatrists steer clear of haloperidol in these patients because it can exacerbate motor symptoms.
Asked if there are any specific patterns of movement disorders linked to anti-NMDAR encephalitis that might raise a psychiatrist’s index of suspicion, the neurologist replied no. Almost all the movement disorders have been seen in psychiatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The one specific movement disorder that strongly suggests anti-NMDAR encephalitis is post–herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis choreoathetosis. It appears that HSV encephalitis can trigger formation of NMDAR autoantibodies, resulting in onset of choreoathetosis 3-6 weeks after the HSV encephalopathy.
Dr. Titulaer reported having no financial conflicts of interest in regard to his presentation.
*This story was updated 1/26/2017.
VIENNA – Prominent psychiatric symptoms are common in patients with anti-N-methyl-D-asparate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis and often occur prior to onset of obvious neurologic symptoms, Maarten J. Titulaer, MD, PhD, said at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
Moreover, occasionally the psychiatric symptoms occur in isolation without neurologic involvement, as was the case in 4% of a series of 501 patients with confirmed anti-NMDAR encephalitis reported by Dr. Titulaer and coinvestigators. The most prominent symptoms included delusional thinking, aggression, and mood disturbances, which were usually manic (JAMA Neurol. 2013 Sep 1;70[9]:1133-9).
Anti-NMDAR encephalitis is an autoimmune disorder in which autoantibodies directed at NMDA receptors on neuronal plasma membranes induce severe neurologic and often psychiatric symptoms.
Red flags that raise the chance that a patient on the psychiatric ward with new-onset psychosis or mania might have primary anti-NMDAR encephalitis and should undergo diagnostic testing include autonomic disturbances such as tachycardia, fever, or hypertension, mild neurologic symptoms such as facial twitching, as well as catatonia, seizures, mutism, or development of extrapyramidal symptoms when placed on an antipsychotic agent. Anti-NMDAR encephalitis can have a relapsing course, so any behavioral change in a patient with a history of the disorder might signal relapse.
Certain cancers are strongly associated with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. New-onset psychotic or manic patients with a history of ovarian teratoma, small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, or thymoma should be tested for anti-NMDAR encephalitis. And conversely, screening for those tumors in occult form is warranted in patients with confirmed anti-NMDAR encephalitis, according to Dr. Titulaer.
Systematic screening for anti-NMDAR encephalitis should also be considered in women with severe acute psychosis during the postpartum period, particularly in the setting of extrapyramidal side effects of antipsychotic agents. Two of 96 consecutive women with acute-onset postpartum psychosis in a series reported by Dr. Titulaer and colleagues were antibody-positive for the disorder, and neither had an ovarian teratoma (Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 1;172[9]:901-8).
If a patient hasn’t developed neurologic symptoms within 4 weeks after onset of psychiatric symptoms, anti-NMDAR psychosis becomes far less likely.
Some neurologists have suggested the presence of other autoimmune disorders in psychiatric patients is associated with increased likelihood that the psychiatric symptoms are secondary to anti-NMDAR encephalitis, but Dr. Titulaer doesn’t find the evidence to date persuasive.
The diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis hinges on the finding of IgG antibodies against the NR1 subunit of the NMDAR. But Dr. Titulaer and coinvestigators have shown there are testing pitfalls: The first-line commercially available cell-based serum assays have a sensitivity of roughly 75% along with 97%-99% specificity, so by relying solely on the cell-based assays a physician might miss one in four cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis and wrongly diagnose the disease in 0.4%-3% of healthy individuals (Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13[2]:167-77).
For this reason, a positive serum test should be confirmed by a cell-based assay of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, which has 100% sensitivity and specificity. And if the serum assay is negative but anti-NMDAR is suspected based on clinical grounds or history, go ahead and test the CSF, the neurologist advised.
Other tools that can be helpful in making the diagnosis include the EEG, which is abnormal in 89% of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Thirty percent of affected patients will display a highly specific EEG abnormality called extreme delta brushes (Neurology. 2012 Sep 11;79[11]:1094-100).
Dr. Titulaer said that this extreme delta brushes pattern is not seen on the regular psychiatry ward, but only in the ICU, when the patient is severely ill. He has yet to see the first convincing extreme delta brushes pattern in a patient outside the ICU.
Brain MRI has proved “very disappointing,” as it’s abnormal in only one-third of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, he continued.
First-line immunotherapy is corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and/or intravenous immunoglobulin. In a series of 501 patients who received first-line immunotherapy or tumor removal, 53% improved within 4 weeks. Fifty-seven percent of those who didn’t then got second-line immunotherapy with rituximab (Rituxan) or cyclophosphamide. Outcomes continued to improve for up to 18 months following symptom onset. At 24 months of follow-up, just over 80% of patients in this observational study had a good outcome as defined by a modified Rankin scale score of 0-2, meaning they were living independently with no or minimal disability.
“Not bad, especially considering that the patients who didn’t improve on first-line therapy were in the ICU for a median of 6 weeks,” the neurologist observed.
“It’s important to diagnose patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis,” he stressed. “Treatment might be difficult. You might need to be very aggressive. But in the end there are very good outcomes. It’s very rewarding to treat these patients.”
In multivariate analysis, Dr. Titulaer and coworkers identified earlier treatment and milder illness as reflected in no ICU admission as significant predictors of good outcome in the study population. Also, the use of second-line immunotherapy in nonresponders to first-line therapy was independently associated with a 2.69-fold increased likelihood of good outcome (Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12[2]:157-65).
Twelve percent of patients experienced one or more relapses within 2 years.
In a separate study of 661 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, only 31 were aged 45 years or older. They had less severe disease than the younger adults but a paradoxically worse outcome, possibly because their median time to diagnosis was twice as long. At 2 years, 60% of the patients aged 45 and up had full or substantial recovery (Neurology. 2013 Sep 17;81[12]:1058-63).
He stressed that treatment of anti-NMDAR encephalitis ought to be an interdisciplinary effort. Psychiatrists will typically not be the ones who administer the potent immunotherapy. But most patients will have behavioral problems in the very early and late phases that warrant psychiatric therapy. Dr. Titulaer suggested psychiatrists steer clear of haloperidol in these patients because it can exacerbate motor symptoms.
Asked if there are any specific patterns of movement disorders linked to anti-NMDAR encephalitis that might raise a psychiatrist’s index of suspicion, the neurologist replied no. Almost all the movement disorders have been seen in psychiatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The one specific movement disorder that strongly suggests anti-NMDAR encephalitis is post–herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis choreoathetosis. It appears that HSV encephalitis can trigger formation of NMDAR autoantibodies, resulting in onset of choreoathetosis 3-6 weeks after the HSV encephalopathy.
Dr. Titulaer reported having no financial conflicts of interest in regard to his presentation.
*This story was updated 1/26/2017.
MIs in pregnancy have worse prognosis
ROME – It’s fortunate that pregnancy-associated acute MIs are infrequent, because the associated in-hospital mortality is markedly higher than in similar-age nonchildbearing women, Reza Masoomi, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
One likely contributor to the disparity in outcome is that current management appears to feature underutilization of percutaneous intervention in women who experience pregnancy-associated MI, according to Dr. Masoomi of the University of Kansas in Kansas City.
He presented an analysis of the U.S. National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2008-2012. The NIS is a nationally representative sample of hospitalizations drawn from all of the country’s nonfederal acute-care hospitals.
A total of 55,315 hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI were recorded in women aged 15-54 years during the study years, of which 453 involved an ante- or postpartum MI. Extrapolating from those figures, nearly 262,000 women aged 15-54 years across the U.S. had an acute MI during the study years, of whom an estimated 2,153 experienced a pregnancy-associated MI.
In-hospital mortality among women with peripregnancy MI was 7.2%, significantly higher than the 5.2% rate in women who weren’t pregnant.
Women with peripregnancy MI had a significantly higher rate of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) than did nonpregnant women with MI in their reproductive years, by a margin of 35.3% to 32.8%. They were younger, too: an average age of 34.9 years, compared with 47.3 years in nonpregnant patients with an MI. Nearly two-thirds of women with peripregnancy MI were nonwhite, compared with 47.3% of the comparison group.
Regardless of whether women with peripregnancy MI had a STEMI or non-STEMI, they had significantly lower rates of diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention. They were also far less likely to receive drug-eluting stents.
Diagnostic coronary angiography was performed in 59% of women with pregnancy-associated STEMI, compared with 73% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI. Only 34% of patients with peripregnancy STEMI underwent PCI, compared with 61% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI. Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 12% of peripregnancy STEMI patients and in 35% of nonpregnant patients. In contrast, 10% of patients with a pregnancy-related STEMI underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, compared with 5% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI.
The PCI rate among women with a peripregnancy non-STEMI was 7.8%, compared with 28.7% in nonpregnant women with a non-STEMI. However, CABG was utilized less frequently in the peripregnancy non-STEMI group, by a margin of 4.4% to 5.9%.
Dr. Masoomi reported having no financial conflicts regarding his study.
ROME – It’s fortunate that pregnancy-associated acute MIs are infrequent, because the associated in-hospital mortality is markedly higher than in similar-age nonchildbearing women, Reza Masoomi, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
One likely contributor to the disparity in outcome is that current management appears to feature underutilization of percutaneous intervention in women who experience pregnancy-associated MI, according to Dr. Masoomi of the University of Kansas in Kansas City.
He presented an analysis of the U.S. National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2008-2012. The NIS is a nationally representative sample of hospitalizations drawn from all of the country’s nonfederal acute-care hospitals.
A total of 55,315 hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI were recorded in women aged 15-54 years during the study years, of which 453 involved an ante- or postpartum MI. Extrapolating from those figures, nearly 262,000 women aged 15-54 years across the U.S. had an acute MI during the study years, of whom an estimated 2,153 experienced a pregnancy-associated MI.
In-hospital mortality among women with peripregnancy MI was 7.2%, significantly higher than the 5.2% rate in women who weren’t pregnant.
Women with peripregnancy MI had a significantly higher rate of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) than did nonpregnant women with MI in their reproductive years, by a margin of 35.3% to 32.8%. They were younger, too: an average age of 34.9 years, compared with 47.3 years in nonpregnant patients with an MI. Nearly two-thirds of women with peripregnancy MI were nonwhite, compared with 47.3% of the comparison group.
Regardless of whether women with peripregnancy MI had a STEMI or non-STEMI, they had significantly lower rates of diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention. They were also far less likely to receive drug-eluting stents.
Diagnostic coronary angiography was performed in 59% of women with pregnancy-associated STEMI, compared with 73% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI. Only 34% of patients with peripregnancy STEMI underwent PCI, compared with 61% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI. Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 12% of peripregnancy STEMI patients and in 35% of nonpregnant patients. In contrast, 10% of patients with a pregnancy-related STEMI underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, compared with 5% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI.
The PCI rate among women with a peripregnancy non-STEMI was 7.8%, compared with 28.7% in nonpregnant women with a non-STEMI. However, CABG was utilized less frequently in the peripregnancy non-STEMI group, by a margin of 4.4% to 5.9%.
Dr. Masoomi reported having no financial conflicts regarding his study.
ROME – It’s fortunate that pregnancy-associated acute MIs are infrequent, because the associated in-hospital mortality is markedly higher than in similar-age nonchildbearing women, Reza Masoomi, MD, said at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
One likely contributor to the disparity in outcome is that current management appears to feature underutilization of percutaneous intervention in women who experience pregnancy-associated MI, according to Dr. Masoomi of the University of Kansas in Kansas City.
He presented an analysis of the U.S. National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2008-2012. The NIS is a nationally representative sample of hospitalizations drawn from all of the country’s nonfederal acute-care hospitals.
A total of 55,315 hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of acute MI were recorded in women aged 15-54 years during the study years, of which 453 involved an ante- or postpartum MI. Extrapolating from those figures, nearly 262,000 women aged 15-54 years across the U.S. had an acute MI during the study years, of whom an estimated 2,153 experienced a pregnancy-associated MI.
In-hospital mortality among women with peripregnancy MI was 7.2%, significantly higher than the 5.2% rate in women who weren’t pregnant.
Women with peripregnancy MI had a significantly higher rate of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) than did nonpregnant women with MI in their reproductive years, by a margin of 35.3% to 32.8%. They were younger, too: an average age of 34.9 years, compared with 47.3 years in nonpregnant patients with an MI. Nearly two-thirds of women with peripregnancy MI were nonwhite, compared with 47.3% of the comparison group.
Regardless of whether women with peripregnancy MI had a STEMI or non-STEMI, they had significantly lower rates of diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention. They were also far less likely to receive drug-eluting stents.
Diagnostic coronary angiography was performed in 59% of women with pregnancy-associated STEMI, compared with 73% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI. Only 34% of patients with peripregnancy STEMI underwent PCI, compared with 61% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI. Drug-eluting stents were implanted in 12% of peripregnancy STEMI patients and in 35% of nonpregnant patients. In contrast, 10% of patients with a pregnancy-related STEMI underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, compared with 5% of nonpregnant women with a STEMI.
The PCI rate among women with a peripregnancy non-STEMI was 7.8%, compared with 28.7% in nonpregnant women with a non-STEMI. However, CABG was utilized less frequently in the peripregnancy non-STEMI group, by a margin of 4.4% to 5.9%.
Dr. Masoomi reported having no financial conflicts regarding his study.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: In-hospital mortality among U.S. women with peripregnancy MI was 7.2% during 2008-2012, significantly higher than the 5.2% rate in women of reproductive age who weren’t pregnant.
Data source: This analysis of data from the U.S. National Inpatient Sample concluded that of an estimated 261,806 U.S. women aged 15-54 years who had an acute MI during 2008-2012, a total of 2,153 of them had an ante- or postpartum-associated MI.
Disclosures: The study presenter reported having no financial conflicts of interest.
Bias rampant in major depression treatment literature
VIENNA – Janneke A. Bastiaansen, PhD, has some advice for clinicians and researchers as they peruse the published literature on clinical trials of medication or psychotherapy for major depressive disorder: Don’t believe everything you read.
“Be critical. Use your critical mind,” she urged at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
The results of her analysis of 105 clinical trials of antidepressant drugs and 142 studies of psychotherapy indicated that the literature is rife with four types of bias: publication, outcome reporting, spin, and citation bias.
She took a closer look at 105 clinical trials of antidepressant drugs registered with the U.S. National Institutes of Health at clinicaltrials.gov. Fifty-three reported positive findings, and 52 were negative. Fifty-two of the 53 positive trials were ultimately published, as were only 25 of the 52 negative studies. That’s a sterling example of publication bias.
Upon careful scrutiny of the 25 negative trials that were published, 10 were misleadingly reported as positive studies. The investigators either switched out the prespecified primary outcome previously filed with NIH and promoted a positive secondary outcome to primary outcome status because the original primary outcome was negative, or they omitted the negative outcomes altogether. That’s outcome-reporting bias.
Of the 15 published negative drug trials that were free of outcome-reporting bias, the authors of 10 of the studies employed “spin,” using phrases such as “the treatment was numerically superior.”
Thus, only 5 of the 25 published negative clinical trials unambiguously reported that the studied treatment was not effective.
“Here the message is that, when you read a paper, look at the results, come up with your own conclusion, and then compare it with the conclusion of the authors, because sometimes they’ve colored it in a more positive way,” Dr. Bastiaansen said in an interview.
Citation bias is the phenomenon whereby positive clinical trials are cited more frequently than published negative trials.
“As a clinician, if you look at the literature and print out every paper that’s out there on a given antidepressant drug for major depression, and you look at that pile, you’ll think: ‘Ah, the literature is really strong about this treatment effect,’ because positive papers selectively cite other positive papers,” she continued.
The pharmaceutical industry takes a lot of heat for selectively burying company-sponsored negative trials, but the literature on psychotherapy for major depression is actually more opaque.
“A lot of people aim their arrows at the pharmaceutical industry and say: ‘Everything’s bad about pharma,’ but actually, you see bias in every field. You see it in the trials of psychotherapy. It’s very important to know that it’s ubiquitous. The positive side of the antidepressant drug trials is that there’s this standard database [clinicaltrials.gov], and you can use it to check out what trial is published and what’s not. It’s not the case for psychotherapy trials. I think we need a mandatory registry for clinical trials of psychotherapy as well,” Dr. Bastiaansen said.
Of the 142 psychotherapy studies, 49 were negative, but the abstracts of only 12 of those 49 concluded that psychotherapy was not more effective than a control.
Dr. Bastiaansen declared having no financial conflicts regarding her university-funded study.
VIENNA – Janneke A. Bastiaansen, PhD, has some advice for clinicians and researchers as they peruse the published literature on clinical trials of medication or psychotherapy for major depressive disorder: Don’t believe everything you read.
“Be critical. Use your critical mind,” she urged at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
The results of her analysis of 105 clinical trials of antidepressant drugs and 142 studies of psychotherapy indicated that the literature is rife with four types of bias: publication, outcome reporting, spin, and citation bias.
She took a closer look at 105 clinical trials of antidepressant drugs registered with the U.S. National Institutes of Health at clinicaltrials.gov. Fifty-three reported positive findings, and 52 were negative. Fifty-two of the 53 positive trials were ultimately published, as were only 25 of the 52 negative studies. That’s a sterling example of publication bias.
Upon careful scrutiny of the 25 negative trials that were published, 10 were misleadingly reported as positive studies. The investigators either switched out the prespecified primary outcome previously filed with NIH and promoted a positive secondary outcome to primary outcome status because the original primary outcome was negative, or they omitted the negative outcomes altogether. That’s outcome-reporting bias.
Of the 15 published negative drug trials that were free of outcome-reporting bias, the authors of 10 of the studies employed “spin,” using phrases such as “the treatment was numerically superior.”
Thus, only 5 of the 25 published negative clinical trials unambiguously reported that the studied treatment was not effective.
“Here the message is that, when you read a paper, look at the results, come up with your own conclusion, and then compare it with the conclusion of the authors, because sometimes they’ve colored it in a more positive way,” Dr. Bastiaansen said in an interview.
Citation bias is the phenomenon whereby positive clinical trials are cited more frequently than published negative trials.
“As a clinician, if you look at the literature and print out every paper that’s out there on a given antidepressant drug for major depression, and you look at that pile, you’ll think: ‘Ah, the literature is really strong about this treatment effect,’ because positive papers selectively cite other positive papers,” she continued.
The pharmaceutical industry takes a lot of heat for selectively burying company-sponsored negative trials, but the literature on psychotherapy for major depression is actually more opaque.
“A lot of people aim their arrows at the pharmaceutical industry and say: ‘Everything’s bad about pharma,’ but actually, you see bias in every field. You see it in the trials of psychotherapy. It’s very important to know that it’s ubiquitous. The positive side of the antidepressant drug trials is that there’s this standard database [clinicaltrials.gov], and you can use it to check out what trial is published and what’s not. It’s not the case for psychotherapy trials. I think we need a mandatory registry for clinical trials of psychotherapy as well,” Dr. Bastiaansen said.
Of the 142 psychotherapy studies, 49 were negative, but the abstracts of only 12 of those 49 concluded that psychotherapy was not more effective than a control.
Dr. Bastiaansen declared having no financial conflicts regarding her university-funded study.
VIENNA – Janneke A. Bastiaansen, PhD, has some advice for clinicians and researchers as they peruse the published literature on clinical trials of medication or psychotherapy for major depressive disorder: Don’t believe everything you read.
“Be critical. Use your critical mind,” she urged at the annual congress of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.
The results of her analysis of 105 clinical trials of antidepressant drugs and 142 studies of psychotherapy indicated that the literature is rife with four types of bias: publication, outcome reporting, spin, and citation bias.
She took a closer look at 105 clinical trials of antidepressant drugs registered with the U.S. National Institutes of Health at clinicaltrials.gov. Fifty-three reported positive findings, and 52 were negative. Fifty-two of the 53 positive trials were ultimately published, as were only 25 of the 52 negative studies. That’s a sterling example of publication bias.
Upon careful scrutiny of the 25 negative trials that were published, 10 were misleadingly reported as positive studies. The investigators either switched out the prespecified primary outcome previously filed with NIH and promoted a positive secondary outcome to primary outcome status because the original primary outcome was negative, or they omitted the negative outcomes altogether. That’s outcome-reporting bias.
Of the 15 published negative drug trials that were free of outcome-reporting bias, the authors of 10 of the studies employed “spin,” using phrases such as “the treatment was numerically superior.”
Thus, only 5 of the 25 published negative clinical trials unambiguously reported that the studied treatment was not effective.
“Here the message is that, when you read a paper, look at the results, come up with your own conclusion, and then compare it with the conclusion of the authors, because sometimes they’ve colored it in a more positive way,” Dr. Bastiaansen said in an interview.
Citation bias is the phenomenon whereby positive clinical trials are cited more frequently than published negative trials.
“As a clinician, if you look at the literature and print out every paper that’s out there on a given antidepressant drug for major depression, and you look at that pile, you’ll think: ‘Ah, the literature is really strong about this treatment effect,’ because positive papers selectively cite other positive papers,” she continued.
The pharmaceutical industry takes a lot of heat for selectively burying company-sponsored negative trials, but the literature on psychotherapy for major depression is actually more opaque.
“A lot of people aim their arrows at the pharmaceutical industry and say: ‘Everything’s bad about pharma,’ but actually, you see bias in every field. You see it in the trials of psychotherapy. It’s very important to know that it’s ubiquitous. The positive side of the antidepressant drug trials is that there’s this standard database [clinicaltrials.gov], and you can use it to check out what trial is published and what’s not. It’s not the case for psychotherapy trials. I think we need a mandatory registry for clinical trials of psychotherapy as well,” Dr. Bastiaansen said.
Of the 142 psychotherapy studies, 49 were negative, but the abstracts of only 12 of those 49 concluded that psychotherapy was not more effective than a control.
Dr. Bastiaansen declared having no financial conflicts regarding her university-funded study.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Only 5 of 25 published negative clinical trials of antidepressant drug therapy unambiguously reported that the studied treatment was not effective.
Data source: For this study, 105 clinical trials of antidepressant drugs and 142 on psychotherapy for major depressive disorder were examined systematically for evidence of four types of bias that damage the quality of the evidence base.
Disclosures: The presenter reported having no financial conflicts of interest regarding her university-funded study.
New screen time guidelines address rapid changes in media environment
SAN FRANCISCO – A new set of policy statements on children’s media use from the American Academy of Pediatrics brings the recommendations into the 21st century.
The new guidance, released at the annual meeting of the AAP, synthesizes the most current evidence on mobile devices, interactivity, educational technology, sleep, obesity, cognitive development, and other aspects of the pervasive digital environment children now grow up in.
“I think our policy statement reflects the changes in the media landscape because not all media use is the same,” Megan A. Moreno, MD, lead author of the policy statement, “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents,” said during a press conference (Pediatrics. 2016, Oct. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592).
The new statement both lowers the overall age at which parents can feel comfortable introducing their children to media and decreases the amount of screen time exposure per day. One key component of the new guidelines includes the unveiling of a new tool parents can use to create a Family Media Plan. The tool, available at https://www.healthychildren.org/English/media/Pages/default.aspx, enables parents to create a plan for each child in the household and reflects the individuality of each child’s use and age-appropriate guidelines.
After parents enter children’s names, the plan provides an editable template for each child that lays out screen-free zones, screen-free times, device curfews, recreational screen-time choices, alternative activities during non-screen time, media manners, digital citizenship, personal safety, sleep, and exercise.
Previous policy statements from the AAP relied primarily on research about television, a passive screen experience. In an age where many children and teens have interactive screens in their pockets and visit grandparents via video conferencing, however, the AAP Council on Communications and Media has likewise broadened its definition of media and noted the problems with applying research about television to other totally different types of screens.
“When we’re using media to connect, this is not what we’re traditionally calling screen time. These are tools,” Jenny S. Radesky, MD, lead author of the policy statement “Media and Young Minds,” said at the press conference (Pediatrics. 2016 Oct. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592). She referred to the fact that many families who are spread across great distances, such as parents deployed overseas or grandparents in another state, use Skype, FaceTime, Google Hangouts, and similar programs to communicate and remain connected.
“We’re making sure our relationships are staying strong and not something to be discouraged with infants and toddlers, even though infants and toddlers will need their parent’s help to understand what they’re seeing on the screen,” said Dr. Radesky, a developmental-behavioral pediatrician at C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
The policy statement further notes that some emerging evidence has suggested children aged 2 and older can learn words from live video chatting with a responsive adult or by using an interactive touch screen that scaffolds learning.
An earlier introduction to screens
Among the most significant changes to the recommendations for children up to 5 years old is an allowance for introducing media before age 2, the previous policy’s age recommendation.
“If you want to introduce media, 18 months is the age when kids are cognitively ready to start, but we’re not saying parents need to introduce media then,” Dr. Radesky said, adding that more research is needed regarding devices such as tablets before it’s possible to know whether apps can be beneficial in toddlers that young. “There’s not enough evidence to know if interactivity helps or not right now,” she said.
The “Media and Young Minds” policy statement notes that children under age 2 years develop their cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional skills through hands-on exploration and social interaction with trusted adults.
“Apps can’t do the things that parents’ minds can do or children’s minds can do on their own,” Dr. Radesky said. The policy notes that digital books, or eBooks, can be beneficial when used like a traditional physical book, but interactive elements to these eBooks could be distracting and decrease children’s comprehension.
When parents do choose to introduce media to their children, it’s “crucial that media be a shared experience” between the caregiving adult and the child, she said. “Think of media as a teaching tool, a way to connect and to create, not just to consume,” Dr. Radesky said.
What can preschoolers learn?
Although some laboratory research shows toddlers as young as 15 months can learn new words from touch screens, they have difficulty transferring that knowledge to the three-dimensional world. For children aged 3-5 years, however, both well-designed television programming and high-quality learning apps from Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and the Sesame Workshop have shown benefits. In addition to early literacy, math, and personal and social development skills learned from shows such as Sesame Street, preschoolers have learned literacy skills from those programs’ apps.
But those apps are unfortunately in the minority.
“Most apps parents find under the ‘educational’ category in app stores have no such evidence of efficacy, target only rote academic skills, are not based on established curricula, and use little or no input from developmental specialists and educators,” the “Media and Young Minds” policy states. “The higher-order thinking skills and executive functions essential for school success, such as task persistence, impulse control, emotion regulation, and creative, flexible thinking, are best taught through unstructured and social (not digital) play, as well as responsive parent-child interactions.” 
Risks and recommendations for preschoolers
Heavy media use among preschoolers, meanwhile, carries risks of increased weight – primarily as a result of food advertising and eating while watching TV – as well as reduced sleep and cognitive, language, and social/emotional delays.
“Content is crucial,” the “Media and Young Minds” policy notes. “Experimental evidence shows that switching from violent content to educational/prosocial content results in significant improvement in behavioral symptoms, particularly for low-income boys.”
The key points of the new statement therefore include the following recommendations:
• Limit media use to 1 hour a day in children ages 2 years and older.
• Do not use screens during mealtimes and for 1 hour before bedtime.
• Start discussing family and child media use with parents early in children’s lives.
• Educate parents about early brain development and help families develop a Family Media Use Plan.
• Discourage screen use besides video-chatting in children under 18 months old.
• Encourage caregiving adults to use screen media with children aged 18-24 months, who should not use it on their own.
• Encourage parents to rely on high-quality programming products such as PBS Kids, Sesame Workshop, and Common Sense Media.
• Help parents with challenges such as setting limits, finding alternatives to screen time, and calming children without using media.
• Avoid using screens or media to calm children except during rare extenuating circumstances, such as painful medical procedures and airplane flights.
• Encourage parents to avoid fast-paced programs, apps with distracting content, any media with violent content, and any background television, which can stunt children’s early language development.
Understanding older youth’s media use
As children move into school age and adolescence, the opportunities and utilities for media use expand – and so do the risks. Children and teens can benefit from media through gaining social support, learning about healthy behaviors, and discovering new ideas and knowledge, but youth remain at risk for obesity, sleep problems, cyberbullying, compromised privacy, and exposure to inaccurate, inappropriate or unsafe content, the “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents” policy statement reports.
Despite the wide range of media types available, TV remains the most commonly used media type among school-aged children and teens and is watched an average of 2 hours a day. Still, 91% of boys have access to a video game console, and 84% report playing games online or on a mobile phone. Further, three-quarters of teens own a smartphone and 76% use at least one social media site, with more than 70% maintaining a “social media portfolio” across several platforms.
Such social media use can provide teens with helpful support networks, particularly for those with ongoing illnesses or disabilities or those needing community support as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, or intersex individuals. Social media can also promote wellness and healthy behaviors such as eating well and not smoking.
Risks for school-aged children and adolescents using media
Yet social media also can open the door to cyberbullying, leading to short-term and long-term social, academic, and health problems. It carries the risk of exploitation of youth or their images, or predation from pornographers and pedophiles. Children and teens must be made aware that the “Internet is forever” and should be taught to consider privacy and confidentiality concerns in their use of social and other media.
Another concern is teens’ “sexting,” in which they share sexually explicit messages and/or partly or fully nude photos. Exposures to unhealthy behaviors, such as substance abuse, sexual behaviors, self-injury, or disordered eating are likewise among the risks of social media, as they are with television and cinema.
In fact, TV/movie content showing alcohol use, smoking, and sexual activity is linked to earlier experimentation among children and adolescents. In addition, each extra hour of television watching is associated with increase in body mass index, as is having a TV set in the bedroom. Enjoying entertainment media while doing school work is linked to poor learning and academics.
Excessive media use may lead to problematic Internet use and Internet gaming disorder as described in the DSM-5, occurring among 4%-8.5% of children and adolescents.
“Symptoms can include a preoccupation with the activity, decreased interest in offline or ‘real life’ relationships, unsuccessful attempts to decrease use and withdrawal symptoms,” the “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents” policy statement notes.
Recommendations for older children
The policy statement advises pediatricians to help families and schools promote understanding of media’s risks and benefits, including awareness of tools to screen for sexting, cyberbullying, problematic Internet use, and Internet gaming disorder. Pediatricians should advocate for training in media literacy in the community and encourage parents to follow the media, sleep, and physical activity guidelines included in the Family Media Plan.
The research was supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The authors reported no disclosures.
SAN FRANCISCO – A new set of policy statements on children’s media use from the American Academy of Pediatrics brings the recommendations into the 21st century.
The new guidance, released at the annual meeting of the AAP, synthesizes the most current evidence on mobile devices, interactivity, educational technology, sleep, obesity, cognitive development, and other aspects of the pervasive digital environment children now grow up in.
“I think our policy statement reflects the changes in the media landscape because not all media use is the same,” Megan A. Moreno, MD, lead author of the policy statement, “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents,” said during a press conference (Pediatrics. 2016, Oct. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592).
The new statement both lowers the overall age at which parents can feel comfortable introducing their children to media and decreases the amount of screen time exposure per day. One key component of the new guidelines includes the unveiling of a new tool parents can use to create a Family Media Plan. The tool, available at https://www.healthychildren.org/English/media/Pages/default.aspx, enables parents to create a plan for each child in the household and reflects the individuality of each child’s use and age-appropriate guidelines.
After parents enter children’s names, the plan provides an editable template for each child that lays out screen-free zones, screen-free times, device curfews, recreational screen-time choices, alternative activities during non-screen time, media manners, digital citizenship, personal safety, sleep, and exercise.
Previous policy statements from the AAP relied primarily on research about television, a passive screen experience. In an age where many children and teens have interactive screens in their pockets and visit grandparents via video conferencing, however, the AAP Council on Communications and Media has likewise broadened its definition of media and noted the problems with applying research about television to other totally different types of screens.
“When we’re using media to connect, this is not what we’re traditionally calling screen time. These are tools,” Jenny S. Radesky, MD, lead author of the policy statement “Media and Young Minds,” said at the press conference (Pediatrics. 2016 Oct. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592). She referred to the fact that many families who are spread across great distances, such as parents deployed overseas or grandparents in another state, use Skype, FaceTime, Google Hangouts, and similar programs to communicate and remain connected.
“We’re making sure our relationships are staying strong and not something to be discouraged with infants and toddlers, even though infants and toddlers will need their parent’s help to understand what they’re seeing on the screen,” said Dr. Radesky, a developmental-behavioral pediatrician at C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
The policy statement further notes that some emerging evidence has suggested children aged 2 and older can learn words from live video chatting with a responsive adult or by using an interactive touch screen that scaffolds learning.
An earlier introduction to screens
Among the most significant changes to the recommendations for children up to 5 years old is an allowance for introducing media before age 2, the previous policy’s age recommendation.
“If you want to introduce media, 18 months is the age when kids are cognitively ready to start, but we’re not saying parents need to introduce media then,” Dr. Radesky said, adding that more research is needed regarding devices such as tablets before it’s possible to know whether apps can be beneficial in toddlers that young. “There’s not enough evidence to know if interactivity helps or not right now,” she said.
The “Media and Young Minds” policy statement notes that children under age 2 years develop their cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional skills through hands-on exploration and social interaction with trusted adults.
“Apps can’t do the things that parents’ minds can do or children’s minds can do on their own,” Dr. Radesky said. The policy notes that digital books, or eBooks, can be beneficial when used like a traditional physical book, but interactive elements to these eBooks could be distracting and decrease children’s comprehension.
When parents do choose to introduce media to their children, it’s “crucial that media be a shared experience” between the caregiving adult and the child, she said. “Think of media as a teaching tool, a way to connect and to create, not just to consume,” Dr. Radesky said.
What can preschoolers learn?
Although some laboratory research shows toddlers as young as 15 months can learn new words from touch screens, they have difficulty transferring that knowledge to the three-dimensional world. For children aged 3-5 years, however, both well-designed television programming and high-quality learning apps from Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and the Sesame Workshop have shown benefits. In addition to early literacy, math, and personal and social development skills learned from shows such as Sesame Street, preschoolers have learned literacy skills from those programs’ apps.
But those apps are unfortunately in the minority.
“Most apps parents find under the ‘educational’ category in app stores have no such evidence of efficacy, target only rote academic skills, are not based on established curricula, and use little or no input from developmental specialists and educators,” the “Media and Young Minds” policy states. “The higher-order thinking skills and executive functions essential for school success, such as task persistence, impulse control, emotion regulation, and creative, flexible thinking, are best taught through unstructured and social (not digital) play, as well as responsive parent-child interactions.”
Risks and recommendations for preschoolers
Heavy media use among preschoolers, meanwhile, carries risks of increased weight – primarily as a result of food advertising and eating while watching TV – as well as reduced sleep and cognitive, language, and social/emotional delays.
“Content is crucial,” the “Media and Young Minds” policy notes. “Experimental evidence shows that switching from violent content to educational/prosocial content results in significant improvement in behavioral symptoms, particularly for low-income boys.”
The key points of the new statement therefore include the following recommendations:
• Limit media use to 1 hour a day in children ages 2 years and older.
• Do not use screens during mealtimes and for 1 hour before bedtime.
• Start discussing family and child media use with parents early in children’s lives.
• Educate parents about early brain development and help families develop a Family Media Use Plan.
• Discourage screen use besides video-chatting in children under 18 months old.
• Encourage caregiving adults to use screen media with children aged 18-24 months, who should not use it on their own.
• Encourage parents to rely on high-quality programming products such as PBS Kids, Sesame Workshop, and Common Sense Media.
• Help parents with challenges such as setting limits, finding alternatives to screen time, and calming children without using media.
• Avoid using screens or media to calm children except during rare extenuating circumstances, such as painful medical procedures and airplane flights.
• Encourage parents to avoid fast-paced programs, apps with distracting content, any media with violent content, and any background television, which can stunt children’s early language development.
Understanding older youth’s media use
As children move into school age and adolescence, the opportunities and utilities for media use expand – and so do the risks. Children and teens can benefit from media through gaining social support, learning about healthy behaviors, and discovering new ideas and knowledge, but youth remain at risk for obesity, sleep problems, cyberbullying, compromised privacy, and exposure to inaccurate, inappropriate or unsafe content, the “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents” policy statement reports.
Despite the wide range of media types available, TV remains the most commonly used media type among school-aged children and teens and is watched an average of 2 hours a day. Still, 91% of boys have access to a video game console, and 84% report playing games online or on a mobile phone. Further, three-quarters of teens own a smartphone and 76% use at least one social media site, with more than 70% maintaining a “social media portfolio” across several platforms.
Such social media use can provide teens with helpful support networks, particularly for those with ongoing illnesses or disabilities or those needing community support as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, or intersex individuals. Social media can also promote wellness and healthy behaviors such as eating well and not smoking.
Risks for school-aged children and adolescents using media
Yet social media also can open the door to cyberbullying, leading to short-term and long-term social, academic, and health problems. It carries the risk of exploitation of youth or their images, or predation from pornographers and pedophiles. Children and teens must be made aware that the “Internet is forever” and should be taught to consider privacy and confidentiality concerns in their use of social and other media.
Another concern is teens’ “sexting,” in which they share sexually explicit messages and/or partly or fully nude photos. Exposures to unhealthy behaviors, such as substance abuse, sexual behaviors, self-injury, or disordered eating are likewise among the risks of social media, as they are with television and cinema.
In fact, TV/movie content showing alcohol use, smoking, and sexual activity is linked to earlier experimentation among children and adolescents. In addition, each extra hour of television watching is associated with increase in body mass index, as is having a TV set in the bedroom. Enjoying entertainment media while doing school work is linked to poor learning and academics.
Excessive media use may lead to problematic Internet use and Internet gaming disorder as described in the DSM-5, occurring among 4%-8.5% of children and adolescents.
“Symptoms can include a preoccupation with the activity, decreased interest in offline or ‘real life’ relationships, unsuccessful attempts to decrease use and withdrawal symptoms,” the “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents” policy statement notes.
Recommendations for older children
The policy statement advises pediatricians to help families and schools promote understanding of media’s risks and benefits, including awareness of tools to screen for sexting, cyberbullying, problematic Internet use, and Internet gaming disorder. Pediatricians should advocate for training in media literacy in the community and encourage parents to follow the media, sleep, and physical activity guidelines included in the Family Media Plan.
The research was supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The authors reported no disclosures.
SAN FRANCISCO – A new set of policy statements on children’s media use from the American Academy of Pediatrics brings the recommendations into the 21st century.
The new guidance, released at the annual meeting of the AAP, synthesizes the most current evidence on mobile devices, interactivity, educational technology, sleep, obesity, cognitive development, and other aspects of the pervasive digital environment children now grow up in.
“I think our policy statement reflects the changes in the media landscape because not all media use is the same,” Megan A. Moreno, MD, lead author of the policy statement, “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents,” said during a press conference (Pediatrics. 2016, Oct. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592).
The new statement both lowers the overall age at which parents can feel comfortable introducing their children to media and decreases the amount of screen time exposure per day. One key component of the new guidelines includes the unveiling of a new tool parents can use to create a Family Media Plan. The tool, available at https://www.healthychildren.org/English/media/Pages/default.aspx, enables parents to create a plan for each child in the household and reflects the individuality of each child’s use and age-appropriate guidelines.
After parents enter children’s names, the plan provides an editable template for each child that lays out screen-free zones, screen-free times, device curfews, recreational screen-time choices, alternative activities during non-screen time, media manners, digital citizenship, personal safety, sleep, and exercise.
Previous policy statements from the AAP relied primarily on research about television, a passive screen experience. In an age where many children and teens have interactive screens in their pockets and visit grandparents via video conferencing, however, the AAP Council on Communications and Media has likewise broadened its definition of media and noted the problems with applying research about television to other totally different types of screens.
“When we’re using media to connect, this is not what we’re traditionally calling screen time. These are tools,” Jenny S. Radesky, MD, lead author of the policy statement “Media and Young Minds,” said at the press conference (Pediatrics. 2016 Oct. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592). She referred to the fact that many families who are spread across great distances, such as parents deployed overseas or grandparents in another state, use Skype, FaceTime, Google Hangouts, and similar programs to communicate and remain connected.
“We’re making sure our relationships are staying strong and not something to be discouraged with infants and toddlers, even though infants and toddlers will need their parent’s help to understand what they’re seeing on the screen,” said Dr. Radesky, a developmental-behavioral pediatrician at C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
The policy statement further notes that some emerging evidence has suggested children aged 2 and older can learn words from live video chatting with a responsive adult or by using an interactive touch screen that scaffolds learning.
An earlier introduction to screens
Among the most significant changes to the recommendations for children up to 5 years old is an allowance for introducing media before age 2, the previous policy’s age recommendation.
“If you want to introduce media, 18 months is the age when kids are cognitively ready to start, but we’re not saying parents need to introduce media then,” Dr. Radesky said, adding that more research is needed regarding devices such as tablets before it’s possible to know whether apps can be beneficial in toddlers that young. “There’s not enough evidence to know if interactivity helps or not right now,” she said.
The “Media and Young Minds” policy statement notes that children under age 2 years develop their cognitive, language, motor, and social-emotional skills through hands-on exploration and social interaction with trusted adults.
“Apps can’t do the things that parents’ minds can do or children’s minds can do on their own,” Dr. Radesky said. The policy notes that digital books, or eBooks, can be beneficial when used like a traditional physical book, but interactive elements to these eBooks could be distracting and decrease children’s comprehension.
When parents do choose to introduce media to their children, it’s “crucial that media be a shared experience” between the caregiving adult and the child, she said. “Think of media as a teaching tool, a way to connect and to create, not just to consume,” Dr. Radesky said.
What can preschoolers learn?
Although some laboratory research shows toddlers as young as 15 months can learn new words from touch screens, they have difficulty transferring that knowledge to the three-dimensional world. For children aged 3-5 years, however, both well-designed television programming and high-quality learning apps from Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and the Sesame Workshop have shown benefits. In addition to early literacy, math, and personal and social development skills learned from shows such as Sesame Street, preschoolers have learned literacy skills from those programs’ apps.
But those apps are unfortunately in the minority.
“Most apps parents find under the ‘educational’ category in app stores have no such evidence of efficacy, target only rote academic skills, are not based on established curricula, and use little or no input from developmental specialists and educators,” the “Media and Young Minds” policy states. “The higher-order thinking skills and executive functions essential for school success, such as task persistence, impulse control, emotion regulation, and creative, flexible thinking, are best taught through unstructured and social (not digital) play, as well as responsive parent-child interactions.”
Risks and recommendations for preschoolers
Heavy media use among preschoolers, meanwhile, carries risks of increased weight – primarily as a result of food advertising and eating while watching TV – as well as reduced sleep and cognitive, language, and social/emotional delays.
“Content is crucial,” the “Media and Young Minds” policy notes. “Experimental evidence shows that switching from violent content to educational/prosocial content results in significant improvement in behavioral symptoms, particularly for low-income boys.”
The key points of the new statement therefore include the following recommendations:
• Limit media use to 1 hour a day in children ages 2 years and older.
• Do not use screens during mealtimes and for 1 hour before bedtime.
• Start discussing family and child media use with parents early in children’s lives.
• Educate parents about early brain development and help families develop a Family Media Use Plan.
• Discourage screen use besides video-chatting in children under 18 months old.
• Encourage caregiving adults to use screen media with children aged 18-24 months, who should not use it on their own.
• Encourage parents to rely on high-quality programming products such as PBS Kids, Sesame Workshop, and Common Sense Media.
• Help parents with challenges such as setting limits, finding alternatives to screen time, and calming children without using media.
• Avoid using screens or media to calm children except during rare extenuating circumstances, such as painful medical procedures and airplane flights.
• Encourage parents to avoid fast-paced programs, apps with distracting content, any media with violent content, and any background television, which can stunt children’s early language development.
Understanding older youth’s media use
As children move into school age and adolescence, the opportunities and utilities for media use expand – and so do the risks. Children and teens can benefit from media through gaining social support, learning about healthy behaviors, and discovering new ideas and knowledge, but youth remain at risk for obesity, sleep problems, cyberbullying, compromised privacy, and exposure to inaccurate, inappropriate or unsafe content, the “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents” policy statement reports.
Despite the wide range of media types available, TV remains the most commonly used media type among school-aged children and teens and is watched an average of 2 hours a day. Still, 91% of boys have access to a video game console, and 84% report playing games online or on a mobile phone. Further, three-quarters of teens own a smartphone and 76% use at least one social media site, with more than 70% maintaining a “social media portfolio” across several platforms.
Such social media use can provide teens with helpful support networks, particularly for those with ongoing illnesses or disabilities or those needing community support as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, or intersex individuals. Social media can also promote wellness and healthy behaviors such as eating well and not smoking.
Risks for school-aged children and adolescents using media
Yet social media also can open the door to cyberbullying, leading to short-term and long-term social, academic, and health problems. It carries the risk of exploitation of youth or their images, or predation from pornographers and pedophiles. Children and teens must be made aware that the “Internet is forever” and should be taught to consider privacy and confidentiality concerns in their use of social and other media.
Another concern is teens’ “sexting,” in which they share sexually explicit messages and/or partly or fully nude photos. Exposures to unhealthy behaviors, such as substance abuse, sexual behaviors, self-injury, or disordered eating are likewise among the risks of social media, as they are with television and cinema.
In fact, TV/movie content showing alcohol use, smoking, and sexual activity is linked to earlier experimentation among children and adolescents. In addition, each extra hour of television watching is associated with increase in body mass index, as is having a TV set in the bedroom. Enjoying entertainment media while doing school work is linked to poor learning and academics.
Excessive media use may lead to problematic Internet use and Internet gaming disorder as described in the DSM-5, occurring among 4%-8.5% of children and adolescents.
“Symptoms can include a preoccupation with the activity, decreased interest in offline or ‘real life’ relationships, unsuccessful attempts to decrease use and withdrawal symptoms,” the “Media Use in School-Aged Children and Adolescents” policy statement notes.
Recommendations for older children
The policy statement advises pediatricians to help families and schools promote understanding of media’s risks and benefits, including awareness of tools to screen for sexting, cyberbullying, problematic Internet use, and Internet gaming disorder. Pediatricians should advocate for training in media literacy in the community and encourage parents to follow the media, sleep, and physical activity guidelines included in the Family Media Plan.
The research was supported by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The authors reported no disclosures.
Deep brain stimulation for early Parkinson’s disease has long-term benefit
BALTIMORE – The use of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) along with optimal drug therapy in patients with early stage Parkinson’s disease produced clinically meaningful improvements in clinician-assessed motor control that lasted at least 5 years in a prospective pilot study.
If the findings bear out a phase III trial that has been approved, DBS may become a valuable method to achieve long-term improvement in motor skills in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
The pilot trial involved 30 patients with Parkinson’s disease, aged 50-75 years, and demonstrated the safety and benefit of DBS in conjunction with optimal drug therapy (ODT) – involving drugs such as carbidopa/levodopa, pramipexole, ropinirole, and selegiline – compared with ODT alone in improving motor scores of the patients through 2 years (Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014. 20[7]:731-7). The latest subanalysis of the trial data took a longer look, examining the effect of DBS through 5 years.
The subanalysis involved 28 patients; 14 in the DBS plus ODT group and 14 in the ODT-only group. Both groups were predominantly male and were similar in age at baseline (about 61 years). Motor control was assessed during the periods when DBS was applied and not applied by using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (clinician assessed) and the Hoehn and Yahr scale.
Over the 5-year period, mean UPDRS motor scores progressively worsened for the ODT group but improved for patients receiving DBS. Patients who received DBS plus ODT had improvements relative to the ODT-only patients of 4.6 points at 1.5 years, 5.8 points at 2 years, 8.9 points at 4 years, and 10.1 points at 5 years.
“These results demonstrate that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation applied in early-stage Parkinson’s disease may provide long-term, clinically meaningful improvement in motor function over standard clinical therapy,” Dr. Hacker said.
The exact mechanism of DBS is still unknown. But, there is evidence that synaptic plasticity is involved. Dr. Hacker speculated that in early Parkinson’s, the DBS intervention comes at a time of relative neuronal stability, which is then maintained.
The results of the pilot trial led to Food and Drug Administration approval of a large-scale, multicenter clinical trial. All participants will be implanted with a DBS device and will receive ODT. Some of the subjects will be randomized to receive DBS during the first 2 years, along with ODT, with the remainder receiving ODT only. In the next 2 years, all subjects will receive DBS and ODT.
Funding was provided by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, the National Institutes of Health, Medtronic, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. Dr. Hacker had no disclosures.
BALTIMORE – The use of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) along with optimal drug therapy in patients with early stage Parkinson’s disease produced clinically meaningful improvements in clinician-assessed motor control that lasted at least 5 years in a prospective pilot study.
If the findings bear out a phase III trial that has been approved, DBS may become a valuable method to achieve long-term improvement in motor skills in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
The pilot trial involved 30 patients with Parkinson’s disease, aged 50-75 years, and demonstrated the safety and benefit of DBS in conjunction with optimal drug therapy (ODT) – involving drugs such as carbidopa/levodopa, pramipexole, ropinirole, and selegiline – compared with ODT alone in improving motor scores of the patients through 2 years (Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014. 20[7]:731-7). The latest subanalysis of the trial data took a longer look, examining the effect of DBS through 5 years.
The subanalysis involved 28 patients; 14 in the DBS plus ODT group and 14 in the ODT-only group. Both groups were predominantly male and were similar in age at baseline (about 61 years). Motor control was assessed during the periods when DBS was applied and not applied by using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (clinician assessed) and the Hoehn and Yahr scale.
Over the 5-year period, mean UPDRS motor scores progressively worsened for the ODT group but improved for patients receiving DBS. Patients who received DBS plus ODT had improvements relative to the ODT-only patients of 4.6 points at 1.5 years, 5.8 points at 2 years, 8.9 points at 4 years, and 10.1 points at 5 years.
“These results demonstrate that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation applied in early-stage Parkinson’s disease may provide long-term, clinically meaningful improvement in motor function over standard clinical therapy,” Dr. Hacker said.
The exact mechanism of DBS is still unknown. But, there is evidence that synaptic plasticity is involved. Dr. Hacker speculated that in early Parkinson’s, the DBS intervention comes at a time of relative neuronal stability, which is then maintained.
The results of the pilot trial led to Food and Drug Administration approval of a large-scale, multicenter clinical trial. All participants will be implanted with a DBS device and will receive ODT. Some of the subjects will be randomized to receive DBS during the first 2 years, along with ODT, with the remainder receiving ODT only. In the next 2 years, all subjects will receive DBS and ODT.
Funding was provided by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, the National Institutes of Health, Medtronic, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. Dr. Hacker had no disclosures.
BALTIMORE – The use of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) along with optimal drug therapy in patients with early stage Parkinson’s disease produced clinically meaningful improvements in clinician-assessed motor control that lasted at least 5 years in a prospective pilot study.
If the findings bear out a phase III trial that has been approved, DBS may become a valuable method to achieve long-term improvement in motor skills in patients with Parkinson’s disease.
The pilot trial involved 30 patients with Parkinson’s disease, aged 50-75 years, and demonstrated the safety and benefit of DBS in conjunction with optimal drug therapy (ODT) – involving drugs such as carbidopa/levodopa, pramipexole, ropinirole, and selegiline – compared with ODT alone in improving motor scores of the patients through 2 years (Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014. 20[7]:731-7). The latest subanalysis of the trial data took a longer look, examining the effect of DBS through 5 years.
The subanalysis involved 28 patients; 14 in the DBS plus ODT group and 14 in the ODT-only group. Both groups were predominantly male and were similar in age at baseline (about 61 years). Motor control was assessed during the periods when DBS was applied and not applied by using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (clinician assessed) and the Hoehn and Yahr scale.
Over the 5-year period, mean UPDRS motor scores progressively worsened for the ODT group but improved for patients receiving DBS. Patients who received DBS plus ODT had improvements relative to the ODT-only patients of 4.6 points at 1.5 years, 5.8 points at 2 years, 8.9 points at 4 years, and 10.1 points at 5 years.
“These results demonstrate that subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation applied in early-stage Parkinson’s disease may provide long-term, clinically meaningful improvement in motor function over standard clinical therapy,” Dr. Hacker said.
The exact mechanism of DBS is still unknown. But, there is evidence that synaptic plasticity is involved. Dr. Hacker speculated that in early Parkinson’s, the DBS intervention comes at a time of relative neuronal stability, which is then maintained.
The results of the pilot trial led to Food and Drug Administration approval of a large-scale, multicenter clinical trial. All participants will be implanted with a DBS device and will receive ODT. Some of the subjects will be randomized to receive DBS during the first 2 years, along with ODT, with the remainder receiving ODT only. In the next 2 years, all subjects will receive DBS and ODT.
Funding was provided by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, the National Institutes of Health, Medtronic, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. Dr. Hacker had no disclosures.
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Patients who received DBS plus ODT had UPDRS motor score improvements relative to the ODT-only patients of 4.6 points at 1.5 years, 5.8 points at 2 years, 8.9 points at 4 years, and 10.1 points at 5 years.
Data source: Secondary analysis of a pilot, prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial involving 30 patients with early Parkinson’s disease.
Disclosures: Dr. Hacker had no disclosures. Funding was provided by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, the National Institutes of Health, Medtronic, and the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research.
Reframing views of patients who malinger advised
WASHINGTON – Imagine desperately wanting addiction treatment while living in a homeless shelter with many people who were using drugs. Could you remain sober for 6 weeks until treatment was available at an outpatient clinic – or would you bluff your way into treatment in an emergency department, where you would receive follow-up care within a week?
This is the kind of challenge that Margaret Balfour, MD, PhD, said she puts to her staff – and to anyone who treats patients they suspect are lying about this medical conditions. “Could [you], as a well-adjusted professional with reasonably good coping skills tolerate the things we ask our patients to do in order to help ‘appropriately’ ” asked Dr. Balfour, chief clinical officer at the Crisis Response Center in Tucson, Ariz., and a vice president for clinical innovation and quality at ConnectionsAZ in Tucson and Phoenix.
Signs of malingering
On average, 13% of the people presenting in the ED malinger, according to panelist Scott A. Simpson, MD, MPH, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, and the medical director of psychiatric emergency services at Denver Health. So, how can a clinician differentiate whether a patient’s story is fact or fiction, and what can be done to get the real story?
Classic signs of malingering include a notable discrepancy between observed and reported symptoms, reports of atypical psychosis, and inexplicable cognitive symptoms. “Watch for things that seem odd, such as late-in-life onset of psychosis, Dr. Simpson said.
Patients who grow increasingly irritated during the patient interview, even to the point of threatening suicide if their treatment demands aren’t met, also can be patients who malinger However, some data do not necessarily support this as cause for alarm, according to Dr. Simpson, who cited a study showing that among 137 patients who endorsed suicidality, the 7-year suicide rate among those who did so conditionally was 0.0%, compared with 11% in those who did not have conditional suicidality (Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jan;53[1]:92-4). The overall 7-year mortality in the first cohort was 4%, compared with 20% in the latter.
Rather than panic in such a situation, go deeper, said panelist John S. Rozel, MD, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh, where he also completed a master of studies in law program and serves as an adjunct professor of law. Dr. Rozel also is the medical director of the university’s re:solve Crisis Network.
“Maybe the person is worried they won’t be taken seriously,” said Dr. Rozel, explaining why some patients will escalate their claims and often are oblivious to their deceit. He shared an anecdote of having been called to treat a 14-year-old trauma patient with suicidality but who didn’t endorse any thoughts of self-harm during the patient interview. Instead, she told him that being suicidal is“what you say when you need more support, and the staff aren’t paying enough attention to you.”
Documenting the behavior
Even when clinicians are sure their patient is malingering, they often are reluctant to document it, according to Rachel Rodriguez, MD, an inpatient/emergency attending psychiatrist at Bellevue Hospital Center in New York.
“Malingering is lying, and lying is distasteful. It’s difficult to talk about,” Dr. Rodriguez said. “It’s also making a judgment about someone’s intentions, which is outside the bounds of what we are trained to do.”
Clinicians are reluctant to formally identify malingering for many reasons, Dr. Rodriguez said in an interview. Those reasons include:
• Future denial of necessary care.
• Fear of retaliation.
• Concerns about making a judgment about motives/intentions.
• Risk of misidentification.
• Fear of liability.
• Feeling sorry for the patient and helpless to address the patient’s actual needs.
Dr. Rodriguez said the underidentification and overidentification of malingering also include unique sets of risks.
At the session, Dr. Rozel agreed that an unwillingness to address malingering head-on does have its risks.
“Documentation is very important in medical malpractice. If we [record] our thinking in our notes, it’s kind of like high school math; you at least get partial credit if you show the work.” Thorough note taking includes recording the observations of all the personnel involved in the patient’s case, according to Dr. Rozel. As an example, he shared an anecdote of a patient endorsing suicidal symptoms in the interview with the clinician, but flirting with others in the waiting area, as witnessed by the admitting nurse.
Based on your observation and on a review of your patient’s prior history, Dr. Rozel suggested this partial list of notes and phrasing can be effective at establishing a “clear paper trail” should there need to be one:
• “Records show an established pattern of seeking inpatient services for ... and delaying discharge during admissions of [include dates].”
• “Review of prior records indicates no evidence of clinical improvement for brief or extended admissions similar to her current presentation.”
• “A second opinion obtained from ... concurs with ...”
• “This case has been reviewed in detail with ...”
• “Formulation and plan have been discussed with patient and other [relevant] providers, including ...”
Dr. Rozel offered this caveat: “I am not a lawyer. The only thing I promise that your lawyer and I will agree on is that they would rather you get your legal advice from them and not from me.”
Reframing the situation
Understanding yourself first will help you understand the patient better, according to Dr. Balfour: “What underlies all this is how you are feeling. Being aware of this is important.”
The range of emotional experiences when dealing with a patient who malingers can run from anger at being lied to, frustration with wasted time and resources, helplessness that nothing seems to make a difference, fear of making the wrong decision, and even hatred borne of constantly experiencing all the other emotions, she said.
Being honest about your own emotions helps keep them out of the way of delivering better care, as does being mindful of the language you use to describe patients. Describing a patient to other staff in words that connote negativity, such as “manipulative,” “attention seeking,” or “high maintenance,” might influence others to see the patient as problematic rather than someone to be helped, said Dr. Balfour, who is with the department of psychiatry at the University of Arizona, Tucson.
Instead of labeling patients, “I find using the techniques of dialectical behavioral training very effective in dealing with [this population],” Dr. Balfour said. A more effective approach includes reframing your view of patients not as liars, but as people who are doing the best they can with what they have in a system that is often set up in ways that prevent, more than augment, care.
In that case, a person who lives in a homeless shelter and who wants help with a drug addiction, for example, will “understandably come to the emergency department to try and get admitted to the inpatient unit where they can get into rehab,” Dr. Balfour said. “Sometimes, our system makes people do things we find annoying in order to get the help they need.”
Instead of making the prevention of unnecessary admissions the goal, find a way to create a rapport with patients to determine their actual problem and see what can be done to solve it. This might take several engagements with the patient, often with more than one staff member. Using the statement, “I don’t feel like I’m getting the whole story” in the patient interview is an effective way to engage patients without accusing them of lying, Dr. Balfour said. “It’s like a magic phrase. Its effectiveness is predicated on the idea that all people, even those who dissemble or embellish, have a wish on some level to reveal sensitive, personal material.”
Remembering not to take malingering personally and that your role is “to be a detective not a bouncer” will help de-escalate untruths, and can lead to a partnership with the patient rather than enmity, Dr. Balfour said.
Dr. Balfour disclosed that she is a consultant for Connections Health Solutions and Otsuka. Dr. Simpson, Dr. Rozel, and Dr. Rodriguez had no relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
WASHINGTON – Imagine desperately wanting addiction treatment while living in a homeless shelter with many people who were using drugs. Could you remain sober for 6 weeks until treatment was available at an outpatient clinic – or would you bluff your way into treatment in an emergency department, where you would receive follow-up care within a week?
This is the kind of challenge that Margaret Balfour, MD, PhD, said she puts to her staff – and to anyone who treats patients they suspect are lying about this medical conditions. “Could [you], as a well-adjusted professional with reasonably good coping skills tolerate the things we ask our patients to do in order to help ‘appropriately’ ” asked Dr. Balfour, chief clinical officer at the Crisis Response Center in Tucson, Ariz., and a vice president for clinical innovation and quality at ConnectionsAZ in Tucson and Phoenix.
Signs of malingering
On average, 13% of the people presenting in the ED malinger, according to panelist Scott A. Simpson, MD, MPH, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, and the medical director of psychiatric emergency services at Denver Health. So, how can a clinician differentiate whether a patient’s story is fact or fiction, and what can be done to get the real story?
Classic signs of malingering include a notable discrepancy between observed and reported symptoms, reports of atypical psychosis, and inexplicable cognitive symptoms. “Watch for things that seem odd, such as late-in-life onset of psychosis, Dr. Simpson said.
Patients who grow increasingly irritated during the patient interview, even to the point of threatening suicide if their treatment demands aren’t met, also can be patients who malinger However, some data do not necessarily support this as cause for alarm, according to Dr. Simpson, who cited a study showing that among 137 patients who endorsed suicidality, the 7-year suicide rate among those who did so conditionally was 0.0%, compared with 11% in those who did not have conditional suicidality (Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jan;53[1]:92-4). The overall 7-year mortality in the first cohort was 4%, compared with 20% in the latter.
Rather than panic in such a situation, go deeper, said panelist John S. Rozel, MD, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh, where he also completed a master of studies in law program and serves as an adjunct professor of law. Dr. Rozel also is the medical director of the university’s re:solve Crisis Network.
“Maybe the person is worried they won’t be taken seriously,” said Dr. Rozel, explaining why some patients will escalate their claims and often are oblivious to their deceit. He shared an anecdote of having been called to treat a 14-year-old trauma patient with suicidality but who didn’t endorse any thoughts of self-harm during the patient interview. Instead, she told him that being suicidal is“what you say when you need more support, and the staff aren’t paying enough attention to you.”
Documenting the behavior
Even when clinicians are sure their patient is malingering, they often are reluctant to document it, according to Rachel Rodriguez, MD, an inpatient/emergency attending psychiatrist at Bellevue Hospital Center in New York.
“Malingering is lying, and lying is distasteful. It’s difficult to talk about,” Dr. Rodriguez said. “It’s also making a judgment about someone’s intentions, which is outside the bounds of what we are trained to do.”
Clinicians are reluctant to formally identify malingering for many reasons, Dr. Rodriguez said in an interview. Those reasons include:
• Future denial of necessary care.
• Fear of retaliation.
• Concerns about making a judgment about motives/intentions.
• Risk of misidentification.
• Fear of liability.
• Feeling sorry for the patient and helpless to address the patient’s actual needs.
Dr. Rodriguez said the underidentification and overidentification of malingering also include unique sets of risks.
At the session, Dr. Rozel agreed that an unwillingness to address malingering head-on does have its risks.
“Documentation is very important in medical malpractice. If we [record] our thinking in our notes, it’s kind of like high school math; you at least get partial credit if you show the work.” Thorough note taking includes recording the observations of all the personnel involved in the patient’s case, according to Dr. Rozel. As an example, he shared an anecdote of a patient endorsing suicidal symptoms in the interview with the clinician, but flirting with others in the waiting area, as witnessed by the admitting nurse.
Based on your observation and on a review of your patient’s prior history, Dr. Rozel suggested this partial list of notes and phrasing can be effective at establishing a “clear paper trail” should there need to be one:
• “Records show an established pattern of seeking inpatient services for ... and delaying discharge during admissions of [include dates].”
• “Review of prior records indicates no evidence of clinical improvement for brief or extended admissions similar to her current presentation.”
• “A second opinion obtained from ... concurs with ...”
• “This case has been reviewed in detail with ...”
• “Formulation and plan have been discussed with patient and other [relevant] providers, including ...”
Dr. Rozel offered this caveat: “I am not a lawyer. The only thing I promise that your lawyer and I will agree on is that they would rather you get your legal advice from them and not from me.”
Reframing the situation
Understanding yourself first will help you understand the patient better, according to Dr. Balfour: “What underlies all this is how you are feeling. Being aware of this is important.”
The range of emotional experiences when dealing with a patient who malingers can run from anger at being lied to, frustration with wasted time and resources, helplessness that nothing seems to make a difference, fear of making the wrong decision, and even hatred borne of constantly experiencing all the other emotions, she said.
Being honest about your own emotions helps keep them out of the way of delivering better care, as does being mindful of the language you use to describe patients. Describing a patient to other staff in words that connote negativity, such as “manipulative,” “attention seeking,” or “high maintenance,” might influence others to see the patient as problematic rather than someone to be helped, said Dr. Balfour, who is with the department of psychiatry at the University of Arizona, Tucson.
Instead of labeling patients, “I find using the techniques of dialectical behavioral training very effective in dealing with [this population],” Dr. Balfour said. A more effective approach includes reframing your view of patients not as liars, but as people who are doing the best they can with what they have in a system that is often set up in ways that prevent, more than augment, care.
In that case, a person who lives in a homeless shelter and who wants help with a drug addiction, for example, will “understandably come to the emergency department to try and get admitted to the inpatient unit where they can get into rehab,” Dr. Balfour said. “Sometimes, our system makes people do things we find annoying in order to get the help they need.”
Instead of making the prevention of unnecessary admissions the goal, find a way to create a rapport with patients to determine their actual problem and see what can be done to solve it. This might take several engagements with the patient, often with more than one staff member. Using the statement, “I don’t feel like I’m getting the whole story” in the patient interview is an effective way to engage patients without accusing them of lying, Dr. Balfour said. “It’s like a magic phrase. Its effectiveness is predicated on the idea that all people, even those who dissemble or embellish, have a wish on some level to reveal sensitive, personal material.”
Remembering not to take malingering personally and that your role is “to be a detective not a bouncer” will help de-escalate untruths, and can lead to a partnership with the patient rather than enmity, Dr. Balfour said.
Dr. Balfour disclosed that she is a consultant for Connections Health Solutions and Otsuka. Dr. Simpson, Dr. Rozel, and Dr. Rodriguez had no relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
WASHINGTON – Imagine desperately wanting addiction treatment while living in a homeless shelter with many people who were using drugs. Could you remain sober for 6 weeks until treatment was available at an outpatient clinic – or would you bluff your way into treatment in an emergency department, where you would receive follow-up care within a week?
This is the kind of challenge that Margaret Balfour, MD, PhD, said she puts to her staff – and to anyone who treats patients they suspect are lying about this medical conditions. “Could [you], as a well-adjusted professional with reasonably good coping skills tolerate the things we ask our patients to do in order to help ‘appropriately’ ” asked Dr. Balfour, chief clinical officer at the Crisis Response Center in Tucson, Ariz., and a vice president for clinical innovation and quality at ConnectionsAZ in Tucson and Phoenix.
Signs of malingering
On average, 13% of the people presenting in the ED malinger, according to panelist Scott A. Simpson, MD, MPH, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Colorado at Denver, Aurora, and the medical director of psychiatric emergency services at Denver Health. So, how can a clinician differentiate whether a patient’s story is fact or fiction, and what can be done to get the real story?
Classic signs of malingering include a notable discrepancy between observed and reported symptoms, reports of atypical psychosis, and inexplicable cognitive symptoms. “Watch for things that seem odd, such as late-in-life onset of psychosis, Dr. Simpson said.
Patients who grow increasingly irritated during the patient interview, even to the point of threatening suicide if their treatment demands aren’t met, also can be patients who malinger However, some data do not necessarily support this as cause for alarm, according to Dr. Simpson, who cited a study showing that among 137 patients who endorsed suicidality, the 7-year suicide rate among those who did so conditionally was 0.0%, compared with 11% in those who did not have conditional suicidality (Psychiatr Serv. 2002 Jan;53[1]:92-4). The overall 7-year mortality in the first cohort was 4%, compared with 20% in the latter.
Rather than panic in such a situation, go deeper, said panelist John S. Rozel, MD, of the department of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh, where he also completed a master of studies in law program and serves as an adjunct professor of law. Dr. Rozel also is the medical director of the university’s re:solve Crisis Network.
“Maybe the person is worried they won’t be taken seriously,” said Dr. Rozel, explaining why some patients will escalate their claims and often are oblivious to their deceit. He shared an anecdote of having been called to treat a 14-year-old trauma patient with suicidality but who didn’t endorse any thoughts of self-harm during the patient interview. Instead, she told him that being suicidal is“what you say when you need more support, and the staff aren’t paying enough attention to you.”
Documenting the behavior
Even when clinicians are sure their patient is malingering, they often are reluctant to document it, according to Rachel Rodriguez, MD, an inpatient/emergency attending psychiatrist at Bellevue Hospital Center in New York.
“Malingering is lying, and lying is distasteful. It’s difficult to talk about,” Dr. Rodriguez said. “It’s also making a judgment about someone’s intentions, which is outside the bounds of what we are trained to do.”
Clinicians are reluctant to formally identify malingering for many reasons, Dr. Rodriguez said in an interview. Those reasons include:
• Future denial of necessary care.
• Fear of retaliation.
• Concerns about making a judgment about motives/intentions.
• Risk of misidentification.
• Fear of liability.
• Feeling sorry for the patient and helpless to address the patient’s actual needs.
Dr. Rodriguez said the underidentification and overidentification of malingering also include unique sets of risks.
At the session, Dr. Rozel agreed that an unwillingness to address malingering head-on does have its risks.
“Documentation is very important in medical malpractice. If we [record] our thinking in our notes, it’s kind of like high school math; you at least get partial credit if you show the work.” Thorough note taking includes recording the observations of all the personnel involved in the patient’s case, according to Dr. Rozel. As an example, he shared an anecdote of a patient endorsing suicidal symptoms in the interview with the clinician, but flirting with others in the waiting area, as witnessed by the admitting nurse.
Based on your observation and on a review of your patient’s prior history, Dr. Rozel suggested this partial list of notes and phrasing can be effective at establishing a “clear paper trail” should there need to be one:
• “Records show an established pattern of seeking inpatient services for ... and delaying discharge during admissions of [include dates].”
• “Review of prior records indicates no evidence of clinical improvement for brief or extended admissions similar to her current presentation.”
• “A second opinion obtained from ... concurs with ...”
• “This case has been reviewed in detail with ...”
• “Formulation and plan have been discussed with patient and other [relevant] providers, including ...”
Dr. Rozel offered this caveat: “I am not a lawyer. The only thing I promise that your lawyer and I will agree on is that they would rather you get your legal advice from them and not from me.”
Reframing the situation
Understanding yourself first will help you understand the patient better, according to Dr. Balfour: “What underlies all this is how you are feeling. Being aware of this is important.”
The range of emotional experiences when dealing with a patient who malingers can run from anger at being lied to, frustration with wasted time and resources, helplessness that nothing seems to make a difference, fear of making the wrong decision, and even hatred borne of constantly experiencing all the other emotions, she said.
Being honest about your own emotions helps keep them out of the way of delivering better care, as does being mindful of the language you use to describe patients. Describing a patient to other staff in words that connote negativity, such as “manipulative,” “attention seeking,” or “high maintenance,” might influence others to see the patient as problematic rather than someone to be helped, said Dr. Balfour, who is with the department of psychiatry at the University of Arizona, Tucson.
Instead of labeling patients, “I find using the techniques of dialectical behavioral training very effective in dealing with [this population],” Dr. Balfour said. A more effective approach includes reframing your view of patients not as liars, but as people who are doing the best they can with what they have in a system that is often set up in ways that prevent, more than augment, care.
In that case, a person who lives in a homeless shelter and who wants help with a drug addiction, for example, will “understandably come to the emergency department to try and get admitted to the inpatient unit where they can get into rehab,” Dr. Balfour said. “Sometimes, our system makes people do things we find annoying in order to get the help they need.”
Instead of making the prevention of unnecessary admissions the goal, find a way to create a rapport with patients to determine their actual problem and see what can be done to solve it. This might take several engagements with the patient, often with more than one staff member. Using the statement, “I don’t feel like I’m getting the whole story” in the patient interview is an effective way to engage patients without accusing them of lying, Dr. Balfour said. “It’s like a magic phrase. Its effectiveness is predicated on the idea that all people, even those who dissemble or embellish, have a wish on some level to reveal sensitive, personal material.”
Remembering not to take malingering personally and that your role is “to be a detective not a bouncer” will help de-escalate untruths, and can lead to a partnership with the patient rather than enmity, Dr. Balfour said.
Dr. Balfour disclosed that she is a consultant for Connections Health Solutions and Otsuka. Dr. Simpson, Dr. Rozel, and Dr. Rodriguez had no relevant disclosures.
[email protected]
On Twitter @whitneymcknight
FDA finalizes boxed warning for Essure
The Food and Drug Administration will require the Essure permanent birth control system to carry a boxed warning about the device’s reported adverse events, including perforation of the uterus and/or fallopian tubes, identification of inserts in the abdominal or pelvic cavity, persistent pain, and suspected allergic or hypersensitivity reactions.
The boxed warning should also state that if the device needs to be removed to address an adverse event, surgery will be necessary.
FDA officials released the final guidance Oct. 28 on labeling for permanent hysteroscopically placed tubal implants intended for sterilization, following the publication of draft labeling requirements in February 2016.
The guidance includes a Patient Decision Checklist to be signed by the patient and the physician, acknowledging that the risks and benefits of the device were discussed. The checklist is divided into sections detailing other birth control options, requirements for Essure placement (including contraindications), pregnancy risks with the device, what to expect during and after the procedure based on clinical studies, and long-term risks.
The new labeling requirements follow years of controversy about the device, which is currently the only permanent contraception option for women that can be performed without surgery.
In September 2015, the FDA Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel reviewed the safety of the device after receiving more than 5,000 complaints of adverse reactions. Consensus from the 19-member panel was that there was a lack of data about the risks of the device and that patients needed better counseling before choosing it as a birth control option.
The final labeling guidance document seeks to address some of those concerns, according to the FDA.
“FDA believes this will help to ensure a woman receives and understands the benefits and risks associated with her contraceptive options so that she can make an informed decision as to whether a permanent hysteroscopically placed tubal implant intended for sterilization is the right choice for her,” according to the guidance document.
In September 2016, the FDA approved a postmarket surveillance study plan from Essure’s manufacturer, Bayer. The 3-year study will compare safety and effectiveness between women who undergo hysterocopic sterilization with Essure and those who have laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryellenny
The Food and Drug Administration will require the Essure permanent birth control system to carry a boxed warning about the device’s reported adverse events, including perforation of the uterus and/or fallopian tubes, identification of inserts in the abdominal or pelvic cavity, persistent pain, and suspected allergic or hypersensitivity reactions.
The boxed warning should also state that if the device needs to be removed to address an adverse event, surgery will be necessary.
FDA officials released the final guidance Oct. 28 on labeling for permanent hysteroscopically placed tubal implants intended for sterilization, following the publication of draft labeling requirements in February 2016.
The guidance includes a Patient Decision Checklist to be signed by the patient and the physician, acknowledging that the risks and benefits of the device were discussed. The checklist is divided into sections detailing other birth control options, requirements for Essure placement (including contraindications), pregnancy risks with the device, what to expect during and after the procedure based on clinical studies, and long-term risks.
The new labeling requirements follow years of controversy about the device, which is currently the only permanent contraception option for women that can be performed without surgery.
In September 2015, the FDA Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel reviewed the safety of the device after receiving more than 5,000 complaints of adverse reactions. Consensus from the 19-member panel was that there was a lack of data about the risks of the device and that patients needed better counseling before choosing it as a birth control option.
The final labeling guidance document seeks to address some of those concerns, according to the FDA.
“FDA believes this will help to ensure a woman receives and understands the benefits and risks associated with her contraceptive options so that she can make an informed decision as to whether a permanent hysteroscopically placed tubal implant intended for sterilization is the right choice for her,” according to the guidance document.
In September 2016, the FDA approved a postmarket surveillance study plan from Essure’s manufacturer, Bayer. The 3-year study will compare safety and effectiveness between women who undergo hysterocopic sterilization with Essure and those who have laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryellenny
The Food and Drug Administration will require the Essure permanent birth control system to carry a boxed warning about the device’s reported adverse events, including perforation of the uterus and/or fallopian tubes, identification of inserts in the abdominal or pelvic cavity, persistent pain, and suspected allergic or hypersensitivity reactions.
The boxed warning should also state that if the device needs to be removed to address an adverse event, surgery will be necessary.
FDA officials released the final guidance Oct. 28 on labeling for permanent hysteroscopically placed tubal implants intended for sterilization, following the publication of draft labeling requirements in February 2016.
The guidance includes a Patient Decision Checklist to be signed by the patient and the physician, acknowledging that the risks and benefits of the device were discussed. The checklist is divided into sections detailing other birth control options, requirements for Essure placement (including contraindications), pregnancy risks with the device, what to expect during and after the procedure based on clinical studies, and long-term risks.
The new labeling requirements follow years of controversy about the device, which is currently the only permanent contraception option for women that can be performed without surgery.
In September 2015, the FDA Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel reviewed the safety of the device after receiving more than 5,000 complaints of adverse reactions. Consensus from the 19-member panel was that there was a lack of data about the risks of the device and that patients needed better counseling before choosing it as a birth control option.
The final labeling guidance document seeks to address some of those concerns, according to the FDA.
“FDA believes this will help to ensure a woman receives and understands the benefits and risks associated with her contraceptive options so that she can make an informed decision as to whether a permanent hysteroscopically placed tubal implant intended for sterilization is the right choice for her,” according to the guidance document.
In September 2016, the FDA approved a postmarket surveillance study plan from Essure’s manufacturer, Bayer. The 3-year study will compare safety and effectiveness between women who undergo hysterocopic sterilization with Essure and those who have laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
[email protected]
On Twitter @maryellenny