Plek2 may be therapeutic target in MPNs

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 12/03/2017 - 00:01
Display Headline
Plek2 may be therapeutic target in MPNs

Lab mouse

New research suggests plecktrin-2 (Plek2) may be a therapeutic target for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Plek2 was previously shown to be involved in red blood cell production.

Now, researchers have found Plek2 is upregulated in patients with JAK2V617F-positive MPNs.

And loss of Plek2 ameliorated JAK2V617F-induced myeloproliferative phenotypes in a mouse model.

Peng Ji, MD, PhD, of Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in The Journal of Clinical Investigation.

The researchers found that Plek2 was significantly upregulated in patients with JAK2V617F-positive MPNs, including myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera.

Plek2 was also upregulated in myeloid, lymphoid, and erythroid cells in a JAK2V617F hematopoietic-specific knock-in mouse model that mimics the pathogenesis of MPNs.

The researchers assessed the effects of turning off Plek2 in this model and found that loss of Plek2 significantly reverted neutrophilia and thrombocytosis, partially reverted reticulocytosis, mildly reduced red blood cell count, significantly reduced megakaryocyte numbers and clusters, and reduced spleen size.

Loss of Plek2 also reduced red blood cell mass, which was the main contributing factor in the reversion of vascular occlusions, according to the researchers. The team detected “widespread vascular occlusions” in mice with Plek2, but mice without Plek2 had “relatively clear vasculature.”

“The risk of thrombosis was not completely cured because there are other factors aside from pleckstrin-2, but we saw a very dramatic amelioration in blood clotting,” Dr Ji said.

Finally, loss of Plek2 improved survival. All mice with Plek2 died at around 30 weeks, but more than 80% of the mice without Plek2 survived beyond 40 weeks.

Dr Ji and his colleagues hope to build upon these findings by developing a Plek2 inhibitor.

“We are looking for a molecule that can bind with pleckstrin-2 and block its functions,” Dr Ji said. “We’ve already screened compounds, and we have about 40 we are testing right now.”

“Mice with pleckstrin-2 deactivated experienced fewer side effects compared to mice without JAK2, so we believe the pleckstrin-2 inhibitor will generate fewer side effects as well.”

Publications
Topics

Lab mouse

New research suggests plecktrin-2 (Plek2) may be a therapeutic target for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Plek2 was previously shown to be involved in red blood cell production.

Now, researchers have found Plek2 is upregulated in patients with JAK2V617F-positive MPNs.

And loss of Plek2 ameliorated JAK2V617F-induced myeloproliferative phenotypes in a mouse model.

Peng Ji, MD, PhD, of Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in The Journal of Clinical Investigation.

The researchers found that Plek2 was significantly upregulated in patients with JAK2V617F-positive MPNs, including myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera.

Plek2 was also upregulated in myeloid, lymphoid, and erythroid cells in a JAK2V617F hematopoietic-specific knock-in mouse model that mimics the pathogenesis of MPNs.

The researchers assessed the effects of turning off Plek2 in this model and found that loss of Plek2 significantly reverted neutrophilia and thrombocytosis, partially reverted reticulocytosis, mildly reduced red blood cell count, significantly reduced megakaryocyte numbers and clusters, and reduced spleen size.

Loss of Plek2 also reduced red blood cell mass, which was the main contributing factor in the reversion of vascular occlusions, according to the researchers. The team detected “widespread vascular occlusions” in mice with Plek2, but mice without Plek2 had “relatively clear vasculature.”

“The risk of thrombosis was not completely cured because there are other factors aside from pleckstrin-2, but we saw a very dramatic amelioration in blood clotting,” Dr Ji said.

Finally, loss of Plek2 improved survival. All mice with Plek2 died at around 30 weeks, but more than 80% of the mice without Plek2 survived beyond 40 weeks.

Dr Ji and his colleagues hope to build upon these findings by developing a Plek2 inhibitor.

“We are looking for a molecule that can bind with pleckstrin-2 and block its functions,” Dr Ji said. “We’ve already screened compounds, and we have about 40 we are testing right now.”

“Mice with pleckstrin-2 deactivated experienced fewer side effects compared to mice without JAK2, so we believe the pleckstrin-2 inhibitor will generate fewer side effects as well.”

Lab mouse

New research suggests plecktrin-2 (Plek2) may be a therapeutic target for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Plek2 was previously shown to be involved in red blood cell production.

Now, researchers have found Plek2 is upregulated in patients with JAK2V617F-positive MPNs.

And loss of Plek2 ameliorated JAK2V617F-induced myeloproliferative phenotypes in a mouse model.

Peng Ji, MD, PhD, of Northwestern University in Chicago, Illinois, and his colleagues conducted this research and reported the results in The Journal of Clinical Investigation.

The researchers found that Plek2 was significantly upregulated in patients with JAK2V617F-positive MPNs, including myelofibrosis, essential thrombocythemia, and polycythemia vera.

Plek2 was also upregulated in myeloid, lymphoid, and erythroid cells in a JAK2V617F hematopoietic-specific knock-in mouse model that mimics the pathogenesis of MPNs.

The researchers assessed the effects of turning off Plek2 in this model and found that loss of Plek2 significantly reverted neutrophilia and thrombocytosis, partially reverted reticulocytosis, mildly reduced red blood cell count, significantly reduced megakaryocyte numbers and clusters, and reduced spleen size.

Loss of Plek2 also reduced red blood cell mass, which was the main contributing factor in the reversion of vascular occlusions, according to the researchers. The team detected “widespread vascular occlusions” in mice with Plek2, but mice without Plek2 had “relatively clear vasculature.”

“The risk of thrombosis was not completely cured because there are other factors aside from pleckstrin-2, but we saw a very dramatic amelioration in blood clotting,” Dr Ji said.

Finally, loss of Plek2 improved survival. All mice with Plek2 died at around 30 weeks, but more than 80% of the mice without Plek2 survived beyond 40 weeks.

Dr Ji and his colleagues hope to build upon these findings by developing a Plek2 inhibitor.

“We are looking for a molecule that can bind with pleckstrin-2 and block its functions,” Dr Ji said. “We’ve already screened compounds, and we have about 40 we are testing right now.”

“Mice with pleckstrin-2 deactivated experienced fewer side effects compared to mice without JAK2, so we believe the pleckstrin-2 inhibitor will generate fewer side effects as well.”

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Plek2 may be therapeutic target in MPNs
Display Headline
Plek2 may be therapeutic target in MPNs
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Which Is Junk: The Aspartame, or the Science?

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 05/03/2022 - 15:21
Display Headline
Which Is Junk: The Aspartame, or the Science?
 

A DIETARY DIAGNOSIS

I’m a hospital CEO and came across an NP colleague’s issue of Clinician Reviews; your September editorial on aspartame (2017;27[9]:6-7) caught my eye. While mine is another “n = 1” experience with the effects of aspartame, it was life-changing.

About 10 years ago, my former wife’s seizures suddenly increased in frequency after a fairly lengthy period without them. The problem was severe enough that she was faced with losing her ability to drive a car.

I had a good business relationship with the Massachusetts General Hospital and sought help from a prominent neurologist there. He asked us to keep a dietary journal before the appointment.

Though he ordered routine diagnostic tests, the journal told him all he needed to know: He told her to eliminate aspartame from her diet. It felt like a miracle when the seizures disappeared—no longer did I need to maintain bumpers on every sharp edge in the house!

Since this experience, I read every article that I can about this chemical additive and was interested to learn of your experiences.

Doug Jones
Ellsworth, ME

THE SCIENCE IS JUNK

I had to write because I can’t believe they allowed you to publish such a ridiculous article based on junk science. Anecdotal reports have no place in medicine. Aspartame is one of the most studied food items around. Many of these claims about the alleged danger of aspartame have been debunked by real scientists.

I am very disappointed.

Darlene Elliott, MSN, RN, CNP
Albuquerque, NM

STOP IGNORING THE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

Thank you for addressing an issue that I believe to be of great importance. There is a huge body of knowledge that the medical community is ignoring regarding the correlation between diet and health in general, in particular the diabetes epidemic. As NPs, we are in a great position to lead.

I encourage you to read Jason Fung’s book, The Obesity Code. The entire book is eye popping, but chapter 15 (“The Diet Soda Delusion”) is particularly pertinent. He has the most thorough understanding of carbohydrate metabolism of all the authors I have read. However, Gary Taubes and Eric Westman have also published valuable resources; their books have changed my life, and I believe their knowledge could apply to many of our patients. If doctors will not embrace science, perhaps NPs will.

Martha DelGiudice, CNM
Smithtown, NY

 

 

 

MAYBE IT'S US …

Every time the “fasten seat belt” sign comes on, the ride gets very bumpy—so from now on, I’m going to ignore it. Aspartame “tricks our brain,” does it? What about agency? Or are we just passive leaves in the air blown about by gusts of aspartame?

Robert Pearlman, PA
Providence, RI

FAST TRACK FROM SWEET TO SOUR

Thank you for shedding light on the dangers of aspartame! My personal experience with it has not been good: One night, after drinking a large quantity of artificially sweetened powdered iced tea, I began to feel numb and experienced strange nerve sensations. I quickly learned that it is a migraine trigger for me. I now avoid aspartame and all other artificial sweeteners.

As a clinical dietitian (and NP), I’ve realized that fake food just doesn’t cut it for the body. Another issue in the dietary realm is that of folic acid. Yes, fortification has done wonders for preventing neural tube defects. But did you know that the folic acid put in our grains is a chemical that our bodies have to methylate to folinic acid, and that more than half of us do not do that well? This means excess synthetic folic acid is floating around in our bodies and brains, attributing to seizures, ADD, ADHD, migraines, miscarriages, etc.

I try to avoid eating foods with added folic acid. Talk about difficult! It means eating a lot of organic grains, whole grains, and natural vitamins with natural methylfolate to prevent anemia. Our bodies are designed to eat natural foods; the more processed something is, the more likely it is to be harmful to us.

Caroline Conneen, C-FNP, RD, IBCLC
Fredericksburg, VA

FAKE FOOD, NOT OUR FRIEND

My husband was habitually drinking flavored seltzer sweetened with aspartame when he became anxious, irritable, and developed insomnia. As soon as he stopped consuming it, the adverse effects dissipated. Since then, he has been astute about reading labels, and we do not support the use of any artificial sweeteners.

I believe aspartame should be taken off the market. The Internet is full of articles that report adverse effects from it. It seems more people are trying to avoid it. As an FNP and PMHNP, I educate my clients about aspartame and how it can exacerbate preexisting problems and contribute to insomnia, mood disorders, and panic/anxiety disorders.

I appreciate your scientific information about aspartame. We need to talk more about this chemical food additive; it is not our friend.

SUCRALOSE, ASPARTAME … ARE THE EFFECTS ONE AND THE SAME?

I have had negative thoughts concerning artificial sweeteners, including sucralose, which seems to be commonly used these days. I do not like the way I feel after ingesting these substances; it’s hard to describe—I just don’t feel right. I wonder if one answer lies in genomics and an individual’s inability to metabolize it? And to think of the byproducts you describe. Thank you for bringing this topic to light.

Anna Simon, CRNP
Allentown, PA

Article PDF
Issue
Clinician Reviews - 27(12)
Publications
Topics
Page Number
6,8
Sections
Article PDF
Article PDF
Related Articles
 

A DIETARY DIAGNOSIS

I’m a hospital CEO and came across an NP colleague’s issue of Clinician Reviews; your September editorial on aspartame (2017;27[9]:6-7) caught my eye. While mine is another “n = 1” experience with the effects of aspartame, it was life-changing.

About 10 years ago, my former wife’s seizures suddenly increased in frequency after a fairly lengthy period without them. The problem was severe enough that she was faced with losing her ability to drive a car.

I had a good business relationship with the Massachusetts General Hospital and sought help from a prominent neurologist there. He asked us to keep a dietary journal before the appointment.

Though he ordered routine diagnostic tests, the journal told him all he needed to know: He told her to eliminate aspartame from her diet. It felt like a miracle when the seizures disappeared—no longer did I need to maintain bumpers on every sharp edge in the house!

Since this experience, I read every article that I can about this chemical additive and was interested to learn of your experiences.

Doug Jones
Ellsworth, ME

THE SCIENCE IS JUNK

I had to write because I can’t believe they allowed you to publish such a ridiculous article based on junk science. Anecdotal reports have no place in medicine. Aspartame is one of the most studied food items around. Many of these claims about the alleged danger of aspartame have been debunked by real scientists.

I am very disappointed.

Darlene Elliott, MSN, RN, CNP
Albuquerque, NM

STOP IGNORING THE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

Thank you for addressing an issue that I believe to be of great importance. There is a huge body of knowledge that the medical community is ignoring regarding the correlation between diet and health in general, in particular the diabetes epidemic. As NPs, we are in a great position to lead.

I encourage you to read Jason Fung’s book, The Obesity Code. The entire book is eye popping, but chapter 15 (“The Diet Soda Delusion”) is particularly pertinent. He has the most thorough understanding of carbohydrate metabolism of all the authors I have read. However, Gary Taubes and Eric Westman have also published valuable resources; their books have changed my life, and I believe their knowledge could apply to many of our patients. If doctors will not embrace science, perhaps NPs will.

Martha DelGiudice, CNM
Smithtown, NY

 

 

 

MAYBE IT'S US …

Every time the “fasten seat belt” sign comes on, the ride gets very bumpy—so from now on, I’m going to ignore it. Aspartame “tricks our brain,” does it? What about agency? Or are we just passive leaves in the air blown about by gusts of aspartame?

Robert Pearlman, PA
Providence, RI

FAST TRACK FROM SWEET TO SOUR

Thank you for shedding light on the dangers of aspartame! My personal experience with it has not been good: One night, after drinking a large quantity of artificially sweetened powdered iced tea, I began to feel numb and experienced strange nerve sensations. I quickly learned that it is a migraine trigger for me. I now avoid aspartame and all other artificial sweeteners.

As a clinical dietitian (and NP), I’ve realized that fake food just doesn’t cut it for the body. Another issue in the dietary realm is that of folic acid. Yes, fortification has done wonders for preventing neural tube defects. But did you know that the folic acid put in our grains is a chemical that our bodies have to methylate to folinic acid, and that more than half of us do not do that well? This means excess synthetic folic acid is floating around in our bodies and brains, attributing to seizures, ADD, ADHD, migraines, miscarriages, etc.

I try to avoid eating foods with added folic acid. Talk about difficult! It means eating a lot of organic grains, whole grains, and natural vitamins with natural methylfolate to prevent anemia. Our bodies are designed to eat natural foods; the more processed something is, the more likely it is to be harmful to us.

Caroline Conneen, C-FNP, RD, IBCLC
Fredericksburg, VA

FAKE FOOD, NOT OUR FRIEND

My husband was habitually drinking flavored seltzer sweetened with aspartame when he became anxious, irritable, and developed insomnia. As soon as he stopped consuming it, the adverse effects dissipated. Since then, he has been astute about reading labels, and we do not support the use of any artificial sweeteners.

I believe aspartame should be taken off the market. The Internet is full of articles that report adverse effects from it. It seems more people are trying to avoid it. As an FNP and PMHNP, I educate my clients about aspartame and how it can exacerbate preexisting problems and contribute to insomnia, mood disorders, and panic/anxiety disorders.

I appreciate your scientific information about aspartame. We need to talk more about this chemical food additive; it is not our friend.

SUCRALOSE, ASPARTAME … ARE THE EFFECTS ONE AND THE SAME?

I have had negative thoughts concerning artificial sweeteners, including sucralose, which seems to be commonly used these days. I do not like the way I feel after ingesting these substances; it’s hard to describe—I just don’t feel right. I wonder if one answer lies in genomics and an individual’s inability to metabolize it? And to think of the byproducts you describe. Thank you for bringing this topic to light.

Anna Simon, CRNP
Allentown, PA

 

A DIETARY DIAGNOSIS

I’m a hospital CEO and came across an NP colleague’s issue of Clinician Reviews; your September editorial on aspartame (2017;27[9]:6-7) caught my eye. While mine is another “n = 1” experience with the effects of aspartame, it was life-changing.

About 10 years ago, my former wife’s seizures suddenly increased in frequency after a fairly lengthy period without them. The problem was severe enough that she was faced with losing her ability to drive a car.

I had a good business relationship with the Massachusetts General Hospital and sought help from a prominent neurologist there. He asked us to keep a dietary journal before the appointment.

Though he ordered routine diagnostic tests, the journal told him all he needed to know: He told her to eliminate aspartame from her diet. It felt like a miracle when the seizures disappeared—no longer did I need to maintain bumpers on every sharp edge in the house!

Since this experience, I read every article that I can about this chemical additive and was interested to learn of your experiences.

Doug Jones
Ellsworth, ME

THE SCIENCE IS JUNK

I had to write because I can’t believe they allowed you to publish such a ridiculous article based on junk science. Anecdotal reports have no place in medicine. Aspartame is one of the most studied food items around. Many of these claims about the alleged danger of aspartame have been debunked by real scientists.

I am very disappointed.

Darlene Elliott, MSN, RN, CNP
Albuquerque, NM

STOP IGNORING THE BODY OF KNOWLEDGE

Thank you for addressing an issue that I believe to be of great importance. There is a huge body of knowledge that the medical community is ignoring regarding the correlation between diet and health in general, in particular the diabetes epidemic. As NPs, we are in a great position to lead.

I encourage you to read Jason Fung’s book, The Obesity Code. The entire book is eye popping, but chapter 15 (“The Diet Soda Delusion”) is particularly pertinent. He has the most thorough understanding of carbohydrate metabolism of all the authors I have read. However, Gary Taubes and Eric Westman have also published valuable resources; their books have changed my life, and I believe their knowledge could apply to many of our patients. If doctors will not embrace science, perhaps NPs will.

Martha DelGiudice, CNM
Smithtown, NY

 

 

 

MAYBE IT'S US …

Every time the “fasten seat belt” sign comes on, the ride gets very bumpy—so from now on, I’m going to ignore it. Aspartame “tricks our brain,” does it? What about agency? Or are we just passive leaves in the air blown about by gusts of aspartame?

Robert Pearlman, PA
Providence, RI

FAST TRACK FROM SWEET TO SOUR

Thank you for shedding light on the dangers of aspartame! My personal experience with it has not been good: One night, after drinking a large quantity of artificially sweetened powdered iced tea, I began to feel numb and experienced strange nerve sensations. I quickly learned that it is a migraine trigger for me. I now avoid aspartame and all other artificial sweeteners.

As a clinical dietitian (and NP), I’ve realized that fake food just doesn’t cut it for the body. Another issue in the dietary realm is that of folic acid. Yes, fortification has done wonders for preventing neural tube defects. But did you know that the folic acid put in our grains is a chemical that our bodies have to methylate to folinic acid, and that more than half of us do not do that well? This means excess synthetic folic acid is floating around in our bodies and brains, attributing to seizures, ADD, ADHD, migraines, miscarriages, etc.

I try to avoid eating foods with added folic acid. Talk about difficult! It means eating a lot of organic grains, whole grains, and natural vitamins with natural methylfolate to prevent anemia. Our bodies are designed to eat natural foods; the more processed something is, the more likely it is to be harmful to us.

Caroline Conneen, C-FNP, RD, IBCLC
Fredericksburg, VA

FAKE FOOD, NOT OUR FRIEND

My husband was habitually drinking flavored seltzer sweetened with aspartame when he became anxious, irritable, and developed insomnia. As soon as he stopped consuming it, the adverse effects dissipated. Since then, he has been astute about reading labels, and we do not support the use of any artificial sweeteners.

I believe aspartame should be taken off the market. The Internet is full of articles that report adverse effects from it. It seems more people are trying to avoid it. As an FNP and PMHNP, I educate my clients about aspartame and how it can exacerbate preexisting problems and contribute to insomnia, mood disorders, and panic/anxiety disorders.

I appreciate your scientific information about aspartame. We need to talk more about this chemical food additive; it is not our friend.

SUCRALOSE, ASPARTAME … ARE THE EFFECTS ONE AND THE SAME?

I have had negative thoughts concerning artificial sweeteners, including sucralose, which seems to be commonly used these days. I do not like the way I feel after ingesting these substances; it’s hard to describe—I just don’t feel right. I wonder if one answer lies in genomics and an individual’s inability to metabolize it? And to think of the byproducts you describe. Thank you for bringing this topic to light.

Anna Simon, CRNP
Allentown, PA

Issue
Clinician Reviews - 27(12)
Issue
Clinician Reviews - 27(12)
Page Number
6,8
Page Number
6,8
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Which Is Junk: The Aspartame, or the Science?
Display Headline
Which Is Junk: The Aspartame, or the Science?
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article PDF Media

Sleep apnea treatment may reduce risk of epileptic seizures

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:13

 

WASHINGTON – In patients with epilepsy, treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure may lead to substantial and sustained reductions in seizure activity, according to data presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

The reduction in seizure activity with continuous positive airway pressure (cPAP) in patients with epilepsy contributes to other evidence that poor sleep quality is an important but preventable risk factor for seizures, according to Thapanee Somboon, MD, a research fellow at the Sleep Disorders Center at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.

Ted Bosworth/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Thapanee Somboon
“We think many clinicians overlook the relationship of sleep to risk of seizures,” Dr. Somboon said. “All patients with epilepsy should be checked for sleep disorders, including insomnia and sleep apnea, because these are associated with seizures and are easily treated.”

In this study, which was characterized as the largest yet to evaluate the effect of cPAP on seizure activity, all 197 patients had epilepsy but only 122 had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Of those with OSA, 73 were treated with cPAP and 49 were not. An additional 75 patients with epilepsy but no OSA were also treated with cPAP. Seizure activity in all groups was evaluated over a period of 1 year.

Treatment success, defined as no seizure activity or at least a 50% reduction from baseline in seizure activity, was achieved in 85% of those with OSA treated with cPAP, 55% of those with OSA that did not receive cPAP, and 65% of those who were treated with cPAP but did not have OSA.

The difference was even greater among those with seizure activity in the 6 months prior to cPAP use. In these, a 50% or greater reduction in seizure activity was achieved in 63% of those with OSA treated with cPAP but in only 14% of those with OSA that did not receive cPAP. In the group without OSA, 44% achieved a 50% or greater reduction in seizure activity from baseline on cPAP.

“Epilepsy patients without OSA also appeared to benefit from cPAP, although prospective data are needed to further explore this observation,” Dr. Somboon said.

All patients remained on antiepileptic drugs over the course of study, and the drug levels were not different between groups, according to Dr. Somboon. About half of all three groups were seizure free in the 6 months prior to cPAP. Those with OSA who received cPAP had a higher body mass index than did those who were not treated (34.6 vs. 31.1; P less than .001), but they were of similar age (47.6 vs. 47.9 years). Those without OSA who were treated with cPAP had a lower BMI (27.5; P less than .001) and were 10 years younger than were those with OSA (37.7 years; P less than .001). About two-thirds of all three groups had a history of focal seizures.

When expressed as odds ratios (OR), those treated for OSA had almost 10 times the likelihood of treatment success at 1 year (OR, 9.58; P less than .001), although being seizure free in the 6 months prior to cPAP had a 20-fold increased likelihood of treatment success (OR, 20.88; P less than .001).

Sleep disturbances and OSA are more common in patients with epilepsy than age-matched controls, according to Dr. Somboon, who cited published studies substantiating these statements. She noted that there are also previously published studies associating improved sleep hygiene, including improved sleep hygiene achieved with cPAP, with a reduced risk of seizure activity in epilepsy patients. However, at present there are no guideline recommendations for screening patients with epilepsy for OSA or other causes of impaired sleep, according to Dr. Somboon.

Although Dr. Somboon acknowledged that the data collected in this study cannot provide a definitive link between cPAP treatment, improved sleep, and reduced risk of seizure activity, this study does support these associations in the context of other evidence.

“We think clinicians should routinely screen patients with epilepsy for OSA and consider cPAP as a strategy to reduce seizure risk,” she said.

Dr. Somboon reported no financial relationships relevant to the study.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

WASHINGTON – In patients with epilepsy, treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure may lead to substantial and sustained reductions in seizure activity, according to data presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

The reduction in seizure activity with continuous positive airway pressure (cPAP) in patients with epilepsy contributes to other evidence that poor sleep quality is an important but preventable risk factor for seizures, according to Thapanee Somboon, MD, a research fellow at the Sleep Disorders Center at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.

Ted Bosworth/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Thapanee Somboon
“We think many clinicians overlook the relationship of sleep to risk of seizures,” Dr. Somboon said. “All patients with epilepsy should be checked for sleep disorders, including insomnia and sleep apnea, because these are associated with seizures and are easily treated.”

In this study, which was characterized as the largest yet to evaluate the effect of cPAP on seizure activity, all 197 patients had epilepsy but only 122 had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Of those with OSA, 73 were treated with cPAP and 49 were not. An additional 75 patients with epilepsy but no OSA were also treated with cPAP. Seizure activity in all groups was evaluated over a period of 1 year.

Treatment success, defined as no seizure activity or at least a 50% reduction from baseline in seizure activity, was achieved in 85% of those with OSA treated with cPAP, 55% of those with OSA that did not receive cPAP, and 65% of those who were treated with cPAP but did not have OSA.

The difference was even greater among those with seizure activity in the 6 months prior to cPAP use. In these, a 50% or greater reduction in seizure activity was achieved in 63% of those with OSA treated with cPAP but in only 14% of those with OSA that did not receive cPAP. In the group without OSA, 44% achieved a 50% or greater reduction in seizure activity from baseline on cPAP.

“Epilepsy patients without OSA also appeared to benefit from cPAP, although prospective data are needed to further explore this observation,” Dr. Somboon said.

All patients remained on antiepileptic drugs over the course of study, and the drug levels were not different between groups, according to Dr. Somboon. About half of all three groups were seizure free in the 6 months prior to cPAP. Those with OSA who received cPAP had a higher body mass index than did those who were not treated (34.6 vs. 31.1; P less than .001), but they were of similar age (47.6 vs. 47.9 years). Those without OSA who were treated with cPAP had a lower BMI (27.5; P less than .001) and were 10 years younger than were those with OSA (37.7 years; P less than .001). About two-thirds of all three groups had a history of focal seizures.

When expressed as odds ratios (OR), those treated for OSA had almost 10 times the likelihood of treatment success at 1 year (OR, 9.58; P less than .001), although being seizure free in the 6 months prior to cPAP had a 20-fold increased likelihood of treatment success (OR, 20.88; P less than .001).

Sleep disturbances and OSA are more common in patients with epilepsy than age-matched controls, according to Dr. Somboon, who cited published studies substantiating these statements. She noted that there are also previously published studies associating improved sleep hygiene, including improved sleep hygiene achieved with cPAP, with a reduced risk of seizure activity in epilepsy patients. However, at present there are no guideline recommendations for screening patients with epilepsy for OSA or other causes of impaired sleep, according to Dr. Somboon.

Although Dr. Somboon acknowledged that the data collected in this study cannot provide a definitive link between cPAP treatment, improved sleep, and reduced risk of seizure activity, this study does support these associations in the context of other evidence.

“We think clinicians should routinely screen patients with epilepsy for OSA and consider cPAP as a strategy to reduce seizure risk,” she said.

Dr. Somboon reported no financial relationships relevant to the study.

 

WASHINGTON – In patients with epilepsy, treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with continuous positive airway pressure may lead to substantial and sustained reductions in seizure activity, according to data presented at the annual meeting of the American Epilepsy Society.

The reduction in seizure activity with continuous positive airway pressure (cPAP) in patients with epilepsy contributes to other evidence that poor sleep quality is an important but preventable risk factor for seizures, according to Thapanee Somboon, MD, a research fellow at the Sleep Disorders Center at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.

Ted Bosworth/Frontline Medical News
Dr. Thapanee Somboon
“We think many clinicians overlook the relationship of sleep to risk of seizures,” Dr. Somboon said. “All patients with epilepsy should be checked for sleep disorders, including insomnia and sleep apnea, because these are associated with seizures and are easily treated.”

In this study, which was characterized as the largest yet to evaluate the effect of cPAP on seizure activity, all 197 patients had epilepsy but only 122 had obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Of those with OSA, 73 were treated with cPAP and 49 were not. An additional 75 patients with epilepsy but no OSA were also treated with cPAP. Seizure activity in all groups was evaluated over a period of 1 year.

Treatment success, defined as no seizure activity or at least a 50% reduction from baseline in seizure activity, was achieved in 85% of those with OSA treated with cPAP, 55% of those with OSA that did not receive cPAP, and 65% of those who were treated with cPAP but did not have OSA.

The difference was even greater among those with seizure activity in the 6 months prior to cPAP use. In these, a 50% or greater reduction in seizure activity was achieved in 63% of those with OSA treated with cPAP but in only 14% of those with OSA that did not receive cPAP. In the group without OSA, 44% achieved a 50% or greater reduction in seizure activity from baseline on cPAP.

“Epilepsy patients without OSA also appeared to benefit from cPAP, although prospective data are needed to further explore this observation,” Dr. Somboon said.

All patients remained on antiepileptic drugs over the course of study, and the drug levels were not different between groups, according to Dr. Somboon. About half of all three groups were seizure free in the 6 months prior to cPAP. Those with OSA who received cPAP had a higher body mass index than did those who were not treated (34.6 vs. 31.1; P less than .001), but they were of similar age (47.6 vs. 47.9 years). Those without OSA who were treated with cPAP had a lower BMI (27.5; P less than .001) and were 10 years younger than were those with OSA (37.7 years; P less than .001). About two-thirds of all three groups had a history of focal seizures.

When expressed as odds ratios (OR), those treated for OSA had almost 10 times the likelihood of treatment success at 1 year (OR, 9.58; P less than .001), although being seizure free in the 6 months prior to cPAP had a 20-fold increased likelihood of treatment success (OR, 20.88; P less than .001).

Sleep disturbances and OSA are more common in patients with epilepsy than age-matched controls, according to Dr. Somboon, who cited published studies substantiating these statements. She noted that there are also previously published studies associating improved sleep hygiene, including improved sleep hygiene achieved with cPAP, with a reduced risk of seizure activity in epilepsy patients. However, at present there are no guideline recommendations for screening patients with epilepsy for OSA or other causes of impaired sleep, according to Dr. Somboon.

Although Dr. Somboon acknowledged that the data collected in this study cannot provide a definitive link between cPAP treatment, improved sleep, and reduced risk of seizure activity, this study does support these associations in the context of other evidence.

“We think clinicians should routinely screen patients with epilepsy for OSA and consider cPAP as a strategy to reduce seizure risk,” she said.

Dr. Somboon reported no financial relationships relevant to the study.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT AES 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: In patients with epilepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), continuous positive airway pressure (cPAP) is associated with a reduced risk of seizures.

Major finding: In epilepsy patients and OSA, seizure activity was reduced by at least half in 63% of those treated with cPAP versus 14% of those who were not (P less than .001).

Data source: A retrospective study of 197 patients with epilepsy.

Disclosures: The presenter reported no financial relationships relevant to the study.

Disqus Comments
Default

Intense urine output monitoring beneficial in ICU

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:13

 

Intense monitoring of urine output could be a useful tool in detecting acute kidney injury (AKI), according to a study conducted at the University of Pittsburgh.

Kui Jin, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh and his associates found that, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, intensive monitoring of urine output (UO) was associated with higher rates of AKI, with an odds ratio of 1.22. Intensive UO monitoring also was strongly associated with improved 30-day survival among patients developing AKI.

shironosov/Thinkstock
“Treatment for AKI is focused on supportive care and identification of the underlying etiology. Both of these priorities might be improved by earlier detection of AKI and closer monitoring of kidney function,” wrote Dr. Jin and his associates.

This retrospective cohort study included 15,724 adult patients admitted to the center’s ICUs during 2000-2008. All patients had either their UO or serum creatinine (SC) monitored. These patients were then divided into subcohorts that were monitored at one of two different intensities. UO intensive monitoring was defined by hourly recordings, with gaps no greater than 3 hours for the first 48 hours after ICU admission. The group receiving less intensive UO monitoring comprised patients who did not meet intensive monitoring criteria, regardless of their UO in the 7 days following ICU admission. The patients who had their SC intensively monitored had 3 calendar days of samples taken after their ICU admissions. Those who did not meet SC intensive monitoring criteria were placed into the less intensive SC monitoring group.

To understand the effect of the monitoring strategies on detecting the development of AKI, the researchers determined each patient’s baseline, admission, and reference serum creatinine levels. Baseline creatinine was defined as the lowest value in the year prior to hospital admission. Reference creatinine was the baseline creatinine, if available, or the lowest creatinine level recorded within 24 hours after ICU admission. A third method for determining reference creatinine levels was used for some patients, which involved making an estimation based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for serum creatinine.

The crude rates of stage 2-3 AKI 7 days after admission to the ICU were similar between patients from both groups that had their UO monitored; 62.5% of intensive and 63.9% of less intensive patients displayed symptoms. After the researchers adjusted for baseline characteristics, however, intensive monitoring of UO was associated with greater rates of stage 2-3 AKI (OR, 1.22; P less than .001). Crude rates were higher in the patients who received intensive monitoring for SC, compared with patients who received less intensive monitoring for SC. Ultimately, Dr. Jin and his associates found that, when caring for patients with or without AKI, fluid management is one of the most important factors. Patients who underwent intensive UO monitoring received less fluid in their first 24 hours (3.6 L) in the ICU, compared with patients who received less intense UO monitoring (4.2 L). Patients who received intensive monitoring of their UO also were less likely to use vasopressors (29.9% vs. 43.3%; P less than .001), suggesting these patients were more hemodynamically stable. Further, the percentage of patients at or above 10% of fluid overload was lower in the group who received intensive monitoring of their UO (2.49% vs. 5.68%; P less than .001), during the first 72 hours in the ICU.

“Our results should help inform clinical decisions and ICU policy around frequency of monitoring of UO, especially for patients at high risk of AKI,” Dr. Jin and his colleagues wrote.

None of the authors had financial disclosures to report. Partial funding was provided by a research grant from C.R. Bard.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Intense monitoring of urine output could be a useful tool in detecting acute kidney injury (AKI), according to a study conducted at the University of Pittsburgh.

Kui Jin, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh and his associates found that, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, intensive monitoring of urine output (UO) was associated with higher rates of AKI, with an odds ratio of 1.22. Intensive UO monitoring also was strongly associated with improved 30-day survival among patients developing AKI.

shironosov/Thinkstock
“Treatment for AKI is focused on supportive care and identification of the underlying etiology. Both of these priorities might be improved by earlier detection of AKI and closer monitoring of kidney function,” wrote Dr. Jin and his associates.

This retrospective cohort study included 15,724 adult patients admitted to the center’s ICUs during 2000-2008. All patients had either their UO or serum creatinine (SC) monitored. These patients were then divided into subcohorts that were monitored at one of two different intensities. UO intensive monitoring was defined by hourly recordings, with gaps no greater than 3 hours for the first 48 hours after ICU admission. The group receiving less intensive UO monitoring comprised patients who did not meet intensive monitoring criteria, regardless of their UO in the 7 days following ICU admission. The patients who had their SC intensively monitored had 3 calendar days of samples taken after their ICU admissions. Those who did not meet SC intensive monitoring criteria were placed into the less intensive SC monitoring group.

To understand the effect of the monitoring strategies on detecting the development of AKI, the researchers determined each patient’s baseline, admission, and reference serum creatinine levels. Baseline creatinine was defined as the lowest value in the year prior to hospital admission. Reference creatinine was the baseline creatinine, if available, or the lowest creatinine level recorded within 24 hours after ICU admission. A third method for determining reference creatinine levels was used for some patients, which involved making an estimation based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for serum creatinine.

The crude rates of stage 2-3 AKI 7 days after admission to the ICU were similar between patients from both groups that had their UO monitored; 62.5% of intensive and 63.9% of less intensive patients displayed symptoms. After the researchers adjusted for baseline characteristics, however, intensive monitoring of UO was associated with greater rates of stage 2-3 AKI (OR, 1.22; P less than .001). Crude rates were higher in the patients who received intensive monitoring for SC, compared with patients who received less intensive monitoring for SC. Ultimately, Dr. Jin and his associates found that, when caring for patients with or without AKI, fluid management is one of the most important factors. Patients who underwent intensive UO monitoring received less fluid in their first 24 hours (3.6 L) in the ICU, compared with patients who received less intense UO monitoring (4.2 L). Patients who received intensive monitoring of their UO also were less likely to use vasopressors (29.9% vs. 43.3%; P less than .001), suggesting these patients were more hemodynamically stable. Further, the percentage of patients at or above 10% of fluid overload was lower in the group who received intensive monitoring of their UO (2.49% vs. 5.68%; P less than .001), during the first 72 hours in the ICU.

“Our results should help inform clinical decisions and ICU policy around frequency of monitoring of UO, especially for patients at high risk of AKI,” Dr. Jin and his colleagues wrote.

None of the authors had financial disclosures to report. Partial funding was provided by a research grant from C.R. Bard.

 

Intense monitoring of urine output could be a useful tool in detecting acute kidney injury (AKI), according to a study conducted at the University of Pittsburgh.

Kui Jin, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh and his associates found that, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, intensive monitoring of urine output (UO) was associated with higher rates of AKI, with an odds ratio of 1.22. Intensive UO monitoring also was strongly associated with improved 30-day survival among patients developing AKI.

shironosov/Thinkstock
“Treatment for AKI is focused on supportive care and identification of the underlying etiology. Both of these priorities might be improved by earlier detection of AKI and closer monitoring of kidney function,” wrote Dr. Jin and his associates.

This retrospective cohort study included 15,724 adult patients admitted to the center’s ICUs during 2000-2008. All patients had either their UO or serum creatinine (SC) monitored. These patients were then divided into subcohorts that were monitored at one of two different intensities. UO intensive monitoring was defined by hourly recordings, with gaps no greater than 3 hours for the first 48 hours after ICU admission. The group receiving less intensive UO monitoring comprised patients who did not meet intensive monitoring criteria, regardless of their UO in the 7 days following ICU admission. The patients who had their SC intensively monitored had 3 calendar days of samples taken after their ICU admissions. Those who did not meet SC intensive monitoring criteria were placed into the less intensive SC monitoring group.

To understand the effect of the monitoring strategies on detecting the development of AKI, the researchers determined each patient’s baseline, admission, and reference serum creatinine levels. Baseline creatinine was defined as the lowest value in the year prior to hospital admission. Reference creatinine was the baseline creatinine, if available, or the lowest creatinine level recorded within 24 hours after ICU admission. A third method for determining reference creatinine levels was used for some patients, which involved making an estimation based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for serum creatinine.

The crude rates of stage 2-3 AKI 7 days after admission to the ICU were similar between patients from both groups that had their UO monitored; 62.5% of intensive and 63.9% of less intensive patients displayed symptoms. After the researchers adjusted for baseline characteristics, however, intensive monitoring of UO was associated with greater rates of stage 2-3 AKI (OR, 1.22; P less than .001). Crude rates were higher in the patients who received intensive monitoring for SC, compared with patients who received less intensive monitoring for SC. Ultimately, Dr. Jin and his associates found that, when caring for patients with or without AKI, fluid management is one of the most important factors. Patients who underwent intensive UO monitoring received less fluid in their first 24 hours (3.6 L) in the ICU, compared with patients who received less intense UO monitoring (4.2 L). Patients who received intensive monitoring of their UO also were less likely to use vasopressors (29.9% vs. 43.3%; P less than .001), suggesting these patients were more hemodynamically stable. Further, the percentage of patients at or above 10% of fluid overload was lower in the group who received intensive monitoring of their UO (2.49% vs. 5.68%; P less than .001), during the first 72 hours in the ICU.

“Our results should help inform clinical decisions and ICU policy around frequency of monitoring of UO, especially for patients at high risk of AKI,” Dr. Jin and his colleagues wrote.

None of the authors had financial disclosures to report. Partial funding was provided by a research grant from C.R. Bard.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM CHEST

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: More intense monitoring of urine output is associated with increased detection of moderate to severe acute kidney injury (AKI).

Major finding: AKI was more likely to be seen in patients who received intensive monitoring of their urine output (OR,1.22; P less than .001).

Data source: Retrospective cohort study at a single academic medical center of 15,724 adult patients admitted to the center’s ICUs during 2000-2008.

Disclosures: None of the authors had financial disclosures to report. Partial funding was provided by a research grant from C.R. Bard.

Disqus Comments
Default

Ectopic pregnancies predicted by easy-to-use risk stratification model

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:13

 

– An easy-to-use risk stratification tool accurately predicted which pregnancies of unknown location were ectopic pregnancies by using a model validated by retrospective chart review.

Reeva Makhijani, MD, and her colleagues built the tool using a composite of risk factors to create a “generalized additive model,” or GAM, in combination with beta HCG levels. They presented the results during a poster session at the annual meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

The model showed that a prior history of ectopic pregnancy (EP) (P = .0045), a history of pelvic surgery (P = .397), and a presentation of vaginal bleeding (P = .0003) all significantly increased the risk of EP.

Another statistical measure, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), helps estimate the likelihood of EP according to beta-HCG levels. When the initial beta-HCG was considered together with the ratio of the initial beta HCG to the presenting beta-HCG, the AUC was 0.889. For the initial beta-HCG level alone, the AUC was 0.793, while for the ratio alone, the AUC was 0.88. Higher AUC figures indicate more predictive power.

Dr. Makhijani, an ob.gyn. resident physician at Brown University, Providence, R.I., and her colleagues have built a prototype of a computer application that calculates risk of EP when the significant risk factors and lab values are entered.

After reviewing the electronic medical records of 800 patients who had pregnancies of unknown location (PUL), in the final analysis Dr. Makhijani and her coauthors included 398 patients whose medical histories allowed assessment of risk factors and whose record included at least two beta-HCG values taken 36-72 hours apart. The investigators also excluded patients with molar pregnancies, ruptured EPs, or who had undergone surgery before a second beta-HCG was obtained.

Of the 398 patients, 40 (10%) were eventually found to have EP, while 168 (42%) had an intrauterine pregnancy, and 190 (48%) were diagnosed with spontaneous abortion.

The patients were about 27 years old on average, and just over half (n = 224) were parous. Vaginal bleeding was a presenting sign in 233 patients, and 284 had abdominal pain. Of those with EP, 34 of 40 had vaginal bleeding, and 25 of 40 had abdominal pain.

In addition to the three factors found to have significant association with EP, the investigators initially considered a number of other patient characteristics, including age, parity, and presentation with abdominal pain. Additional risk factors examined included history of infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease, sexually transmitted disease, intrauterine device placement, and diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure. None of these were significantly associated with risk of EP.

“Our model can be translated into an easy-to-use risk stratification tool that can accurately predict the risk of EP,” said Dr. Makhijani and her coauthors. “This tool could potentially be used by clinicians and ob.gyn. residencies nationally as [pregnancies of unknown location] are a very common management scenario.”

Dr. Makhijani reported having no disclosures and no outside sources of funding.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– An easy-to-use risk stratification tool accurately predicted which pregnancies of unknown location were ectopic pregnancies by using a model validated by retrospective chart review.

Reeva Makhijani, MD, and her colleagues built the tool using a composite of risk factors to create a “generalized additive model,” or GAM, in combination with beta HCG levels. They presented the results during a poster session at the annual meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

The model showed that a prior history of ectopic pregnancy (EP) (P = .0045), a history of pelvic surgery (P = .397), and a presentation of vaginal bleeding (P = .0003) all significantly increased the risk of EP.

Another statistical measure, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), helps estimate the likelihood of EP according to beta-HCG levels. When the initial beta-HCG was considered together with the ratio of the initial beta HCG to the presenting beta-HCG, the AUC was 0.889. For the initial beta-HCG level alone, the AUC was 0.793, while for the ratio alone, the AUC was 0.88. Higher AUC figures indicate more predictive power.

Dr. Makhijani, an ob.gyn. resident physician at Brown University, Providence, R.I., and her colleagues have built a prototype of a computer application that calculates risk of EP when the significant risk factors and lab values are entered.

After reviewing the electronic medical records of 800 patients who had pregnancies of unknown location (PUL), in the final analysis Dr. Makhijani and her coauthors included 398 patients whose medical histories allowed assessment of risk factors and whose record included at least two beta-HCG values taken 36-72 hours apart. The investigators also excluded patients with molar pregnancies, ruptured EPs, or who had undergone surgery before a second beta-HCG was obtained.

Of the 398 patients, 40 (10%) were eventually found to have EP, while 168 (42%) had an intrauterine pregnancy, and 190 (48%) were diagnosed with spontaneous abortion.

The patients were about 27 years old on average, and just over half (n = 224) were parous. Vaginal bleeding was a presenting sign in 233 patients, and 284 had abdominal pain. Of those with EP, 34 of 40 had vaginal bleeding, and 25 of 40 had abdominal pain.

In addition to the three factors found to have significant association with EP, the investigators initially considered a number of other patient characteristics, including age, parity, and presentation with abdominal pain. Additional risk factors examined included history of infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease, sexually transmitted disease, intrauterine device placement, and diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure. None of these were significantly associated with risk of EP.

“Our model can be translated into an easy-to-use risk stratification tool that can accurately predict the risk of EP,” said Dr. Makhijani and her coauthors. “This tool could potentially be used by clinicians and ob.gyn. residencies nationally as [pregnancies of unknown location] are a very common management scenario.”

Dr. Makhijani reported having no disclosures and no outside sources of funding.

 

– An easy-to-use risk stratification tool accurately predicted which pregnancies of unknown location were ectopic pregnancies by using a model validated by retrospective chart review.

Reeva Makhijani, MD, and her colleagues built the tool using a composite of risk factors to create a “generalized additive model,” or GAM, in combination with beta HCG levels. They presented the results during a poster session at the annual meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

The model showed that a prior history of ectopic pregnancy (EP) (P = .0045), a history of pelvic surgery (P = .397), and a presentation of vaginal bleeding (P = .0003) all significantly increased the risk of EP.

Another statistical measure, the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), helps estimate the likelihood of EP according to beta-HCG levels. When the initial beta-HCG was considered together with the ratio of the initial beta HCG to the presenting beta-HCG, the AUC was 0.889. For the initial beta-HCG level alone, the AUC was 0.793, while for the ratio alone, the AUC was 0.88. Higher AUC figures indicate more predictive power.

Dr. Makhijani, an ob.gyn. resident physician at Brown University, Providence, R.I., and her colleagues have built a prototype of a computer application that calculates risk of EP when the significant risk factors and lab values are entered.

After reviewing the electronic medical records of 800 patients who had pregnancies of unknown location (PUL), in the final analysis Dr. Makhijani and her coauthors included 398 patients whose medical histories allowed assessment of risk factors and whose record included at least two beta-HCG values taken 36-72 hours apart. The investigators also excluded patients with molar pregnancies, ruptured EPs, or who had undergone surgery before a second beta-HCG was obtained.

Of the 398 patients, 40 (10%) were eventually found to have EP, while 168 (42%) had an intrauterine pregnancy, and 190 (48%) were diagnosed with spontaneous abortion.

The patients were about 27 years old on average, and just over half (n = 224) were parous. Vaginal bleeding was a presenting sign in 233 patients, and 284 had abdominal pain. Of those with EP, 34 of 40 had vaginal bleeding, and 25 of 40 had abdominal pain.

In addition to the three factors found to have significant association with EP, the investigators initially considered a number of other patient characteristics, including age, parity, and presentation with abdominal pain. Additional risk factors examined included history of infertility, pelvic inflammatory disease, sexually transmitted disease, intrauterine device placement, and diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure. None of these were significantly associated with risk of EP.

“Our model can be translated into an easy-to-use risk stratification tool that can accurately predict the risk of EP,” said Dr. Makhijani and her coauthors. “This tool could potentially be used by clinicians and ob.gyn. residencies nationally as [pregnancies of unknown location] are a very common management scenario.”

Dr. Makhijani reported having no disclosures and no outside sources of funding.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

AT ASRM 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The risk that a pregnancy of unknown location may be ectopic was predicted using a computer model.

Major finding: Incorporating initial and serial beta-HCGs yielded an AUC of 0.889 for predicting ectopic pregnancy.

Data source: A retrospective chart review of 398 patients with pregnancy of unknown location.

Disclosures: The presenter reported having no relevant disclosures and no outside sources of funding.

Disqus Comments
Default

NIH goes straight to pregnant women in new research project

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:13

 

Research on pregnancy is now being crowdsourced, with pregnant women being asked in a new federal research project to “tell researchers and health care providers what pregnancy is really like.”

The project, PregSource, was launched in November by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Women who join PregSource (https://pregsource.nih.gov) are asked to chart changes to their weight, sleep, mood, morning sickness, and physical activity and to answer monthly online surveys about their pregnancy experiences, symptoms, and complications. It is hoped that resulting de-identified data will help inform future studies and improve maternal care, NICHD officials said.

digitalskillet/Thinkstock
The project took root years ago under the tutelage of former NICHD director Alan Guttmacher, MD, and grew as the Obama Administration held workshops and forums in 2014 and 2015 – and then developed tools and resources – to promote citizen science and crowdsourcing initiatives in the public sector.

“We had come to the recognition that we – the scientific community – lack a comprehensive database about how pregnancy affects women in the modern world,” said Caroline Signore, MD, MPH, deputy director of NICHD’s division of extramural research and principal investigator of PregSource.
 

 

“We spend a lot of time talking about the complications of pregnancy, but we don’t know a whole lot about the baseline experiences. . .the experiential trends of pregnancy” such as how many women experience morning sickness and for how long, and how pregnancy affects sleep patterns, she said.

By crowdsourcing to pregnant women themselves – by asking them to voluntarily offer data and make observations, “we’re researching on a large scale and doing so relatively cost effectively,” said Dr. Signore, an ob.gyn. “Women who are interested in contributing to science can [do so] on their own terms. They can visit PregSource on their own time and enter as much data as they want.”

Hal E. Lawrence III, MD, executive vice president and chief executive officer of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, called the project “groundbreaking” and said that NICHD should have “no problem” meeting its initial target of 100,000 pregnant women. “This is different from the other pregnancy apps,” he said. “This is more of a reporting and an informative [site], which the others aren’t.”

ACOG is one of about a dozen partnering organizations – along with the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Nurse-Midwives – that have worked with NICHD on shaping the project and contributing content for a resource library that PregSource participants will have access to.

The project is currently in a “soft-launch phase,” Dr. Signore said, and will step up its outreach to women and providers in January.

Along with the current series of “trackers” and monthly questionnaires (in addition to questionnaires about prepregnancy health), women who indicate that they have physical disabilities or certain complications or conditions such as diabetes will be asked to participate in additional information-gathering modules. And once the project has amassed enough data, women will be able to compare specific experiences with those of other participants.

“A woman who’s 5 months’ pregnant and completes questions on nausea and vomiting, say, can click a button and see how everyone else who’s been in PregSource at this time has answered that question,” Dr. Signore said. “Or a woman who indicates she’s having a lot of heartburn at 27 weeks can learn about how many other women are having heartburn. We think this will be valuable for women, because [they’re] always wondering, ‘Is my experience unique?’ ”

NICHD officials said they hope women will share with their ob.gyns. or other providers the charts from their PregSource trackers, such as those plotting the individual’s weight gain against Institute of Medicine-recommended weight gain ranges. “We like to think that PregSource will promote conversations and shared decision making. . .and hopefully that it will improve that individual woman’s outcomes,” Dr. Signore said.

Indeed, said Uma M. Reddy, MD, MPH, project scientist for the NICHD’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network, women who use PregSource’s trackers should be “more in tune with their pregnancies” and with staying healthy. She and other experts touted PregSource at the recent biennial meeting of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group.

The NICHD also plans to gently nudge women toward any relevant clinical studies underway in their locales “by simply notifying the women and making the information available to them,” Dr. Signore said. In addition, the project will invite women to track their experiences for several years after childbirth so more data can be generated on associations between pregnancy and child and maternal health. “Just as with the whole project, we’re trying to take into account the benefit-burden ratio and hope that women will continue to see value,” she said.

The NICHD-sponsored project will not sell or share any personal information to a third party, and participants will not receive any ads or product announcements. Data from the project – all of it de-identified – will be shared with approved researchers for their own analyses.

“We see it being already equipped to answer [existing] questions and to probe relationships” between pregnancy characteristics and complications, for instance, Dr. Signore said. “But it also could be a hypothesis-generating resource.”

A Spanish version will come “once we know we’ve optimized functionality and syntax,” she said. And overall, the NICHD is ready for growth, both in numbers of participants and in content.

ACOG is rooting for its success, Dr. Lawrence said. “We’ll have to wait and see how the results help us, but I’ll tell you one thing, having no data will never help us.”

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Research on pregnancy is now being crowdsourced, with pregnant women being asked in a new federal research project to “tell researchers and health care providers what pregnancy is really like.”

The project, PregSource, was launched in November by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Women who join PregSource (https://pregsource.nih.gov) are asked to chart changes to their weight, sleep, mood, morning sickness, and physical activity and to answer monthly online surveys about their pregnancy experiences, symptoms, and complications. It is hoped that resulting de-identified data will help inform future studies and improve maternal care, NICHD officials said.

digitalskillet/Thinkstock
The project took root years ago under the tutelage of former NICHD director Alan Guttmacher, MD, and grew as the Obama Administration held workshops and forums in 2014 and 2015 – and then developed tools and resources – to promote citizen science and crowdsourcing initiatives in the public sector.

“We had come to the recognition that we – the scientific community – lack a comprehensive database about how pregnancy affects women in the modern world,” said Caroline Signore, MD, MPH, deputy director of NICHD’s division of extramural research and principal investigator of PregSource.
 

 

“We spend a lot of time talking about the complications of pregnancy, but we don’t know a whole lot about the baseline experiences. . .the experiential trends of pregnancy” such as how many women experience morning sickness and for how long, and how pregnancy affects sleep patterns, she said.

By crowdsourcing to pregnant women themselves – by asking them to voluntarily offer data and make observations, “we’re researching on a large scale and doing so relatively cost effectively,” said Dr. Signore, an ob.gyn. “Women who are interested in contributing to science can [do so] on their own terms. They can visit PregSource on their own time and enter as much data as they want.”

Hal E. Lawrence III, MD, executive vice president and chief executive officer of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, called the project “groundbreaking” and said that NICHD should have “no problem” meeting its initial target of 100,000 pregnant women. “This is different from the other pregnancy apps,” he said. “This is more of a reporting and an informative [site], which the others aren’t.”

ACOG is one of about a dozen partnering organizations – along with the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Nurse-Midwives – that have worked with NICHD on shaping the project and contributing content for a resource library that PregSource participants will have access to.

The project is currently in a “soft-launch phase,” Dr. Signore said, and will step up its outreach to women and providers in January.

Along with the current series of “trackers” and monthly questionnaires (in addition to questionnaires about prepregnancy health), women who indicate that they have physical disabilities or certain complications or conditions such as diabetes will be asked to participate in additional information-gathering modules. And once the project has amassed enough data, women will be able to compare specific experiences with those of other participants.

“A woman who’s 5 months’ pregnant and completes questions on nausea and vomiting, say, can click a button and see how everyone else who’s been in PregSource at this time has answered that question,” Dr. Signore said. “Or a woman who indicates she’s having a lot of heartburn at 27 weeks can learn about how many other women are having heartburn. We think this will be valuable for women, because [they’re] always wondering, ‘Is my experience unique?’ ”

NICHD officials said they hope women will share with their ob.gyns. or other providers the charts from their PregSource trackers, such as those plotting the individual’s weight gain against Institute of Medicine-recommended weight gain ranges. “We like to think that PregSource will promote conversations and shared decision making. . .and hopefully that it will improve that individual woman’s outcomes,” Dr. Signore said.

Indeed, said Uma M. Reddy, MD, MPH, project scientist for the NICHD’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network, women who use PregSource’s trackers should be “more in tune with their pregnancies” and with staying healthy. She and other experts touted PregSource at the recent biennial meeting of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group.

The NICHD also plans to gently nudge women toward any relevant clinical studies underway in their locales “by simply notifying the women and making the information available to them,” Dr. Signore said. In addition, the project will invite women to track their experiences for several years after childbirth so more data can be generated on associations between pregnancy and child and maternal health. “Just as with the whole project, we’re trying to take into account the benefit-burden ratio and hope that women will continue to see value,” she said.

The NICHD-sponsored project will not sell or share any personal information to a third party, and participants will not receive any ads or product announcements. Data from the project – all of it de-identified – will be shared with approved researchers for their own analyses.

“We see it being already equipped to answer [existing] questions and to probe relationships” between pregnancy characteristics and complications, for instance, Dr. Signore said. “But it also could be a hypothesis-generating resource.”

A Spanish version will come “once we know we’ve optimized functionality and syntax,” she said. And overall, the NICHD is ready for growth, both in numbers of participants and in content.

ACOG is rooting for its success, Dr. Lawrence said. “We’ll have to wait and see how the results help us, but I’ll tell you one thing, having no data will never help us.”

 

 

Research on pregnancy is now being crowdsourced, with pregnant women being asked in a new federal research project to “tell researchers and health care providers what pregnancy is really like.”

The project, PregSource, was launched in November by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). Women who join PregSource (https://pregsource.nih.gov) are asked to chart changes to their weight, sleep, mood, morning sickness, and physical activity and to answer monthly online surveys about their pregnancy experiences, symptoms, and complications. It is hoped that resulting de-identified data will help inform future studies and improve maternal care, NICHD officials said.

digitalskillet/Thinkstock
The project took root years ago under the tutelage of former NICHD director Alan Guttmacher, MD, and grew as the Obama Administration held workshops and forums in 2014 and 2015 – and then developed tools and resources – to promote citizen science and crowdsourcing initiatives in the public sector.

“We had come to the recognition that we – the scientific community – lack a comprehensive database about how pregnancy affects women in the modern world,” said Caroline Signore, MD, MPH, deputy director of NICHD’s division of extramural research and principal investigator of PregSource.
 

 

“We spend a lot of time talking about the complications of pregnancy, but we don’t know a whole lot about the baseline experiences. . .the experiential trends of pregnancy” such as how many women experience morning sickness and for how long, and how pregnancy affects sleep patterns, she said.

By crowdsourcing to pregnant women themselves – by asking them to voluntarily offer data and make observations, “we’re researching on a large scale and doing so relatively cost effectively,” said Dr. Signore, an ob.gyn. “Women who are interested in contributing to science can [do so] on their own terms. They can visit PregSource on their own time and enter as much data as they want.”

Hal E. Lawrence III, MD, executive vice president and chief executive officer of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, called the project “groundbreaking” and said that NICHD should have “no problem” meeting its initial target of 100,000 pregnant women. “This is different from the other pregnancy apps,” he said. “This is more of a reporting and an informative [site], which the others aren’t.”

ACOG is one of about a dozen partnering organizations – along with the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Nurse-Midwives – that have worked with NICHD on shaping the project and contributing content for a resource library that PregSource participants will have access to.

The project is currently in a “soft-launch phase,” Dr. Signore said, and will step up its outreach to women and providers in January.

Along with the current series of “trackers” and monthly questionnaires (in addition to questionnaires about prepregnancy health), women who indicate that they have physical disabilities or certain complications or conditions such as diabetes will be asked to participate in additional information-gathering modules. And once the project has amassed enough data, women will be able to compare specific experiences with those of other participants.

“A woman who’s 5 months’ pregnant and completes questions on nausea and vomiting, say, can click a button and see how everyone else who’s been in PregSource at this time has answered that question,” Dr. Signore said. “Or a woman who indicates she’s having a lot of heartburn at 27 weeks can learn about how many other women are having heartburn. We think this will be valuable for women, because [they’re] always wondering, ‘Is my experience unique?’ ”

NICHD officials said they hope women will share with their ob.gyns. or other providers the charts from their PregSource trackers, such as those plotting the individual’s weight gain against Institute of Medicine-recommended weight gain ranges. “We like to think that PregSource will promote conversations and shared decision making. . .and hopefully that it will improve that individual woman’s outcomes,” Dr. Signore said.

Indeed, said Uma M. Reddy, MD, MPH, project scientist for the NICHD’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network, women who use PregSource’s trackers should be “more in tune with their pregnancies” and with staying healthy. She and other experts touted PregSource at the recent biennial meeting of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group.

The NICHD also plans to gently nudge women toward any relevant clinical studies underway in their locales “by simply notifying the women and making the information available to them,” Dr. Signore said. In addition, the project will invite women to track their experiences for several years after childbirth so more data can be generated on associations between pregnancy and child and maternal health. “Just as with the whole project, we’re trying to take into account the benefit-burden ratio and hope that women will continue to see value,” she said.

The NICHD-sponsored project will not sell or share any personal information to a third party, and participants will not receive any ads or product announcements. Data from the project – all of it de-identified – will be shared with approved researchers for their own analyses.

“We see it being already equipped to answer [existing] questions and to probe relationships” between pregnancy characteristics and complications, for instance, Dr. Signore said. “But it also could be a hypothesis-generating resource.”

A Spanish version will come “once we know we’ve optimized functionality and syntax,” she said. And overall, the NICHD is ready for growth, both in numbers of participants and in content.

ACOG is rooting for its success, Dr. Lawrence said. “We’ll have to wait and see how the results help us, but I’ll tell you one thing, having no data will never help us.”

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default

First-in-class glutaminase inhibitor combats anti-PD-1/PD-L1 resistance

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 10:13

 

– Combination treatment with the first-in-class glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 and nivolumab is well-tolerated and shows clinical activity in patients with advanced melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung cancer, including anti-PD-1/PD-L1 refractory patients, according to initial results from a phase 1/2 study.

Responses in melanoma patients who were progressing on nivolumab at study entry and who were refractory to multiple prior immunotherapy regimens are particularly notable, as they highlight the potential for CB-839, when added to nivolumab (Opdivo), to help overcome resistance to anti-PD-L1 therapy, Funda Meric‐Bernstam, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

CB‐839 is highly selective and targets tumor glutamine metabolism, said Dr. Meric-Bernstam of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Competition between tumor cells and immune cells for nutrients such as glutamine in the tumor microenvironment can create a metabolic checkpoint that induces local immune suppression. CB‐839 inhibits tumor glutamine consumption, thereby increasing glutamine availability to support T‐cell activity, she explained, noting that in preclinical models, CB‐839 increased intra‐tumoral glutamine and enhanced antitumor activity of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors.

In the phase 1 dose escalation study, she and her colleagues evaluated the safety and efficacy of CB-839 in combination with the PD‐1 inhibitor nivolumab in patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Phase 2 expansion cohorts include a melanoma rescue cohort of patients progressing on anti-PD-L1 therapy at study entry (22 patients), an NSCLC and RCC rescue cohort of patients who were progressing on anti-PD-L1 therapy at study entry or who had stable disease for 6 months or longer without a response (11 NSCLC and 11 RCC), an RCC cohort of patients with prior immunotherapy exposure and no response (10 patients), and an RCC cohort of patents who had no prior immunotherapy exposure (28 patients).

During dose escalation, patients received oral CB‐839 at 600 mg or 800 mg twice daily in combination with standard‐dose nivolumab. In the ongoing phase 2 expansion study, which continues to enroll, patients are receiving 800 mg of CB-839 twice daily with standard‐dose nivolumab, Dr. Meric-Bernstam said.

Patients in each of the cohorts were high risk and/or had intermediate or poor prognostic status at study entry. For example, 50% of patients in the melanoma rescue cohort had liver metastases, 77% had other visceral metastases, and 18% had brain metastases, and the majority of patients in the lung cancer/RCC cohort had visceral metastases. Most had progressive disease as their best response on their last line of immunotherapy.

Of 16 response-evaluable melanoma patients, 1 experienced a complete response, 2 had partial responses, and 4 had stable disease.

“So overall in this patient population that was progressing on a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor at enrollment, 19% had an objective response. The disease control rate in this group was 44%,” she said.

In evaluable patients in the lung cancer rescue cohort (6 patients), RCC rescue cohort (8 patients), and RCC prior exposure cohort (7 patients), disease control rates ranged from 57% to 75%, and in the immunotherapy-naive RCC cohort (19 patients), the partial response rate was 21%, and 53% had stable disease, so the overall disease control rate was 74%. Half of the patients in that group remain on study, she noted.

A closer look at the melanoma rescue cohort showed dramatic and rapid responses in two patients who each achieved a partial response in about 8 weeks with response durations of 3.7 months and 5.4 months, respectively. Additionally, pre-treatment biopsies in this cohort showed an elevated T-cell inflamed signature associated with clinical benefit from the addition of CB-839, and in one patient who had both a pretreatment and on-treatment biopsy that was evaluable, the latter showed an increase in T-cell inflamed signature and T-cell effector genes.

In all cohorts, the combination therapy was generally well tolerated. A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicity – a grade 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase – occurred in one patient on the 800-mg dose. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events were fatigue, nausea, photophobia, rash, and elevated ALT, she said, noting that two patients discontinued for treatment-related adverse events (one for a grade 3 rash and one for grade 2 pneumonitis).

“Overall there appeared to be no apparent increase in immune-related adverse events, either in rate or severity, compared with [nivolumab] monotherapy,” she said.

The combination of CB-839 and nivolumab was well tolerated, and in some patients – as seen in the melanoma cohort – adding CB-839 to checkpoint blockade can overcome checkpoint blockade resistance, Dr. Meric-Bernstam concluded, noting that the disease control rates seen in the majority of lung cancer and RCC patients who were progressing on checkpoint blockade is encouraging, as is the objective response rate seen thus far in the RCC therapy-naive patients, and the stable and deep responses seen in the melanoma rescue cohort.

“Based on our encouraging signal in the melanoma rescue cohort, this [cohort] has been expanded,” she said.

Calithera Biosciences sponsored the study. Bristol-Myers Squibb provided nivolumab for the study. Dr. Meric-Bernstam has received grant or research support from Calithera Biosciences and many other companies. She also reported being a paid consultant for several companies and serving on an advisory committee or review panel, or as a board member for multiple companies.

[email protected]

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

– Combination treatment with the first-in-class glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 and nivolumab is well-tolerated and shows clinical activity in patients with advanced melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung cancer, including anti-PD-1/PD-L1 refractory patients, according to initial results from a phase 1/2 study.

Responses in melanoma patients who were progressing on nivolumab at study entry and who were refractory to multiple prior immunotherapy regimens are particularly notable, as they highlight the potential for CB-839, when added to nivolumab (Opdivo), to help overcome resistance to anti-PD-L1 therapy, Funda Meric‐Bernstam, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

CB‐839 is highly selective and targets tumor glutamine metabolism, said Dr. Meric-Bernstam of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Competition between tumor cells and immune cells for nutrients such as glutamine in the tumor microenvironment can create a metabolic checkpoint that induces local immune suppression. CB‐839 inhibits tumor glutamine consumption, thereby increasing glutamine availability to support T‐cell activity, she explained, noting that in preclinical models, CB‐839 increased intra‐tumoral glutamine and enhanced antitumor activity of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors.

In the phase 1 dose escalation study, she and her colleagues evaluated the safety and efficacy of CB-839 in combination with the PD‐1 inhibitor nivolumab in patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Phase 2 expansion cohorts include a melanoma rescue cohort of patients progressing on anti-PD-L1 therapy at study entry (22 patients), an NSCLC and RCC rescue cohort of patients who were progressing on anti-PD-L1 therapy at study entry or who had stable disease for 6 months or longer without a response (11 NSCLC and 11 RCC), an RCC cohort of patients with prior immunotherapy exposure and no response (10 patients), and an RCC cohort of patents who had no prior immunotherapy exposure (28 patients).

During dose escalation, patients received oral CB‐839 at 600 mg or 800 mg twice daily in combination with standard‐dose nivolumab. In the ongoing phase 2 expansion study, which continues to enroll, patients are receiving 800 mg of CB-839 twice daily with standard‐dose nivolumab, Dr. Meric-Bernstam said.

Patients in each of the cohorts were high risk and/or had intermediate or poor prognostic status at study entry. For example, 50% of patients in the melanoma rescue cohort had liver metastases, 77% had other visceral metastases, and 18% had brain metastases, and the majority of patients in the lung cancer/RCC cohort had visceral metastases. Most had progressive disease as their best response on their last line of immunotherapy.

Of 16 response-evaluable melanoma patients, 1 experienced a complete response, 2 had partial responses, and 4 had stable disease.

“So overall in this patient population that was progressing on a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor at enrollment, 19% had an objective response. The disease control rate in this group was 44%,” she said.

In evaluable patients in the lung cancer rescue cohort (6 patients), RCC rescue cohort (8 patients), and RCC prior exposure cohort (7 patients), disease control rates ranged from 57% to 75%, and in the immunotherapy-naive RCC cohort (19 patients), the partial response rate was 21%, and 53% had stable disease, so the overall disease control rate was 74%. Half of the patients in that group remain on study, she noted.

A closer look at the melanoma rescue cohort showed dramatic and rapid responses in two patients who each achieved a partial response in about 8 weeks with response durations of 3.7 months and 5.4 months, respectively. Additionally, pre-treatment biopsies in this cohort showed an elevated T-cell inflamed signature associated with clinical benefit from the addition of CB-839, and in one patient who had both a pretreatment and on-treatment biopsy that was evaluable, the latter showed an increase in T-cell inflamed signature and T-cell effector genes.

In all cohorts, the combination therapy was generally well tolerated. A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicity – a grade 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase – occurred in one patient on the 800-mg dose. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events were fatigue, nausea, photophobia, rash, and elevated ALT, she said, noting that two patients discontinued for treatment-related adverse events (one for a grade 3 rash and one for grade 2 pneumonitis).

“Overall there appeared to be no apparent increase in immune-related adverse events, either in rate or severity, compared with [nivolumab] monotherapy,” she said.

The combination of CB-839 and nivolumab was well tolerated, and in some patients – as seen in the melanoma cohort – adding CB-839 to checkpoint blockade can overcome checkpoint blockade resistance, Dr. Meric-Bernstam concluded, noting that the disease control rates seen in the majority of lung cancer and RCC patients who were progressing on checkpoint blockade is encouraging, as is the objective response rate seen thus far in the RCC therapy-naive patients, and the stable and deep responses seen in the melanoma rescue cohort.

“Based on our encouraging signal in the melanoma rescue cohort, this [cohort] has been expanded,” she said.

Calithera Biosciences sponsored the study. Bristol-Myers Squibb provided nivolumab for the study. Dr. Meric-Bernstam has received grant or research support from Calithera Biosciences and many other companies. She also reported being a paid consultant for several companies and serving on an advisory committee or review panel, or as a board member for multiple companies.

[email protected]

 

– Combination treatment with the first-in-class glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 and nivolumab is well-tolerated and shows clinical activity in patients with advanced melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung cancer, including anti-PD-1/PD-L1 refractory patients, according to initial results from a phase 1/2 study.

Responses in melanoma patients who were progressing on nivolumab at study entry and who were refractory to multiple prior immunotherapy regimens are particularly notable, as they highlight the potential for CB-839, when added to nivolumab (Opdivo), to help overcome resistance to anti-PD-L1 therapy, Funda Meric‐Bernstam, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

CB‐839 is highly selective and targets tumor glutamine metabolism, said Dr. Meric-Bernstam of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Competition between tumor cells and immune cells for nutrients such as glutamine in the tumor microenvironment can create a metabolic checkpoint that induces local immune suppression. CB‐839 inhibits tumor glutamine consumption, thereby increasing glutamine availability to support T‐cell activity, she explained, noting that in preclinical models, CB‐839 increased intra‐tumoral glutamine and enhanced antitumor activity of PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors.

In the phase 1 dose escalation study, she and her colleagues evaluated the safety and efficacy of CB-839 in combination with the PD‐1 inhibitor nivolumab in patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Phase 2 expansion cohorts include a melanoma rescue cohort of patients progressing on anti-PD-L1 therapy at study entry (22 patients), an NSCLC and RCC rescue cohort of patients who were progressing on anti-PD-L1 therapy at study entry or who had stable disease for 6 months or longer without a response (11 NSCLC and 11 RCC), an RCC cohort of patients with prior immunotherapy exposure and no response (10 patients), and an RCC cohort of patents who had no prior immunotherapy exposure (28 patients).

During dose escalation, patients received oral CB‐839 at 600 mg or 800 mg twice daily in combination with standard‐dose nivolumab. In the ongoing phase 2 expansion study, which continues to enroll, patients are receiving 800 mg of CB-839 twice daily with standard‐dose nivolumab, Dr. Meric-Bernstam said.

Patients in each of the cohorts were high risk and/or had intermediate or poor prognostic status at study entry. For example, 50% of patients in the melanoma rescue cohort had liver metastases, 77% had other visceral metastases, and 18% had brain metastases, and the majority of patients in the lung cancer/RCC cohort had visceral metastases. Most had progressive disease as their best response on their last line of immunotherapy.

Of 16 response-evaluable melanoma patients, 1 experienced a complete response, 2 had partial responses, and 4 had stable disease.

“So overall in this patient population that was progressing on a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor at enrollment, 19% had an objective response. The disease control rate in this group was 44%,” she said.

In evaluable patients in the lung cancer rescue cohort (6 patients), RCC rescue cohort (8 patients), and RCC prior exposure cohort (7 patients), disease control rates ranged from 57% to 75%, and in the immunotherapy-naive RCC cohort (19 patients), the partial response rate was 21%, and 53% had stable disease, so the overall disease control rate was 74%. Half of the patients in that group remain on study, she noted.

A closer look at the melanoma rescue cohort showed dramatic and rapid responses in two patients who each achieved a partial response in about 8 weeks with response durations of 3.7 months and 5.4 months, respectively. Additionally, pre-treatment biopsies in this cohort showed an elevated T-cell inflamed signature associated with clinical benefit from the addition of CB-839, and in one patient who had both a pretreatment and on-treatment biopsy that was evaluable, the latter showed an increase in T-cell inflamed signature and T-cell effector genes.

In all cohorts, the combination therapy was generally well tolerated. A maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Dose-limiting toxicity – a grade 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase – occurred in one patient on the 800-mg dose. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events were fatigue, nausea, photophobia, rash, and elevated ALT, she said, noting that two patients discontinued for treatment-related adverse events (one for a grade 3 rash and one for grade 2 pneumonitis).

“Overall there appeared to be no apparent increase in immune-related adverse events, either in rate or severity, compared with [nivolumab] monotherapy,” she said.

The combination of CB-839 and nivolumab was well tolerated, and in some patients – as seen in the melanoma cohort – adding CB-839 to checkpoint blockade can overcome checkpoint blockade resistance, Dr. Meric-Bernstam concluded, noting that the disease control rates seen in the majority of lung cancer and RCC patients who were progressing on checkpoint blockade is encouraging, as is the objective response rate seen thus far in the RCC therapy-naive patients, and the stable and deep responses seen in the melanoma rescue cohort.

“Based on our encouraging signal in the melanoma rescue cohort, this [cohort] has been expanded,” she said.

Calithera Biosciences sponsored the study. Bristol-Myers Squibb provided nivolumab for the study. Dr. Meric-Bernstam has received grant or research support from Calithera Biosciences and many other companies. She also reported being a paid consultant for several companies and serving on an advisory committee or review panel, or as a board member for multiple companies.

[email protected]

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT SITC 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Combination treatment with the first-in-class glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 and nivolumab shows promise for overcoming anti-PD-1/PD-L1 resistance.

Major finding: The objective response rate in advanced melanoma patients refractory to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was 19%.

Data source: A phase 1/2 study of 82 patients.

Disclosures: Calithera Biosciences sponsored the study. Bristol-Myers Squibb provided nivolumab for the study. Dr. Meric-Bernstam has received grant or research support from Calithera Biosciences and many other companies. She also reported being a paid consultant for several companies and serving on an advisory committee or review panel or as a board member for multiple companies.

Disqus Comments
Default

Pancreatic surgery: Similar outcomes with primary anastomosis, allografts

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 01/02/2019 - 10:02

 

Pancreatic tumor involvement with the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) is common and requires exploration and resection, which has now become an integral part of routine surgical treatment. The short-term outcome of SMV/PV reconstruction with interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allografts was found to be comparable to that of reconstruction with primary end-to-end anastomosis, according to the results of a study performed by Dyre Kleive, MD, and his colleagues.

In order to assess the optimal method of reconstructing the portal vein during pancreatic surgery, Dr. Kleive and his colleagues performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreatic surgery with venous resection and reconstruction at a single center between January 2006 and December 2015.

A total of 857 patients underwent open pancreatic surgery during the study period, of whom 171 (20%) had vascular resection and reconstruction. The study population comprised 42 patients treated with cold-stored interposition cadaveric allografts for reconstruction and 71 patients who had primary end-to-end anastomosis instead. Patients with other forms of reconstruction were excluded, according to an online report in the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.003).

Early failure at the reconstruction site was defined as the presence of thrombosis or no flow or low flow within the first 30 days after surgery.

Patients in the allograft group had statistically significantly longer mean operative times, more intraoperative bleeding, more frequent use of neoadjuvant therapy, and a longer length of tumor-vein involvement than the anastomosis group.

However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients with major complications (42.9% for allografts vs. 36.6% for anastomosis) or early failure at the reconstruction site (9.5% for allografts vs. 8.5% for anastomosis) between the two groups, Dr Kleive and his colleagues reported.

The proportion of patients with grade C stenosis at last available imaging scan was significantly higher in the allograft group (26/42 [61.9%] vs. 13 of 66 [19.7%] for the anastomosis group; P less than .01). A subgroup analysis of 10 patients in the allograft group showed the presence of donor-specific antibodies in all patients. This could indicate that graft rejection was a contributing factor to the statistically higher development of severe stenosis in allograft vs. anastomosis patients, the authors suggested.

“This study shows that the short-term outcome of SMV/PV reconstruction with interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allografts is comparable to that of reconstruction with primary end-to-end anastomosis,” the researchers concluded.

Dr. Kleive and his colleagues reported that they had no conflicts of interest.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Pancreatic tumor involvement with the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) is common and requires exploration and resection, which has now become an integral part of routine surgical treatment. The short-term outcome of SMV/PV reconstruction with interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allografts was found to be comparable to that of reconstruction with primary end-to-end anastomosis, according to the results of a study performed by Dyre Kleive, MD, and his colleagues.

In order to assess the optimal method of reconstructing the portal vein during pancreatic surgery, Dr. Kleive and his colleagues performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreatic surgery with venous resection and reconstruction at a single center between January 2006 and December 2015.

A total of 857 patients underwent open pancreatic surgery during the study period, of whom 171 (20%) had vascular resection and reconstruction. The study population comprised 42 patients treated with cold-stored interposition cadaveric allografts for reconstruction and 71 patients who had primary end-to-end anastomosis instead. Patients with other forms of reconstruction were excluded, according to an online report in the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.003).

Early failure at the reconstruction site was defined as the presence of thrombosis or no flow or low flow within the first 30 days after surgery.

Patients in the allograft group had statistically significantly longer mean operative times, more intraoperative bleeding, more frequent use of neoadjuvant therapy, and a longer length of tumor-vein involvement than the anastomosis group.

However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients with major complications (42.9% for allografts vs. 36.6% for anastomosis) or early failure at the reconstruction site (9.5% for allografts vs. 8.5% for anastomosis) between the two groups, Dr Kleive and his colleagues reported.

The proportion of patients with grade C stenosis at last available imaging scan was significantly higher in the allograft group (26/42 [61.9%] vs. 13 of 66 [19.7%] for the anastomosis group; P less than .01). A subgroup analysis of 10 patients in the allograft group showed the presence of donor-specific antibodies in all patients. This could indicate that graft rejection was a contributing factor to the statistically higher development of severe stenosis in allograft vs. anastomosis patients, the authors suggested.

“This study shows that the short-term outcome of SMV/PV reconstruction with interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allografts is comparable to that of reconstruction with primary end-to-end anastomosis,” the researchers concluded.

Dr. Kleive and his colleagues reported that they had no conflicts of interest.

 

Pancreatic tumor involvement with the superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) is common and requires exploration and resection, which has now become an integral part of routine surgical treatment. The short-term outcome of SMV/PV reconstruction with interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allografts was found to be comparable to that of reconstruction with primary end-to-end anastomosis, according to the results of a study performed by Dyre Kleive, MD, and his colleagues.

In order to assess the optimal method of reconstructing the portal vein during pancreatic surgery, Dr. Kleive and his colleagues performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreatic surgery with venous resection and reconstruction at a single center between January 2006 and December 2015.

A total of 857 patients underwent open pancreatic surgery during the study period, of whom 171 (20%) had vascular resection and reconstruction. The study population comprised 42 patients treated with cold-stored interposition cadaveric allografts for reconstruction and 71 patients who had primary end-to-end anastomosis instead. Patients with other forms of reconstruction were excluded, according to an online report in the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders (2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.003).

Early failure at the reconstruction site was defined as the presence of thrombosis or no flow or low flow within the first 30 days after surgery.

Patients in the allograft group had statistically significantly longer mean operative times, more intraoperative bleeding, more frequent use of neoadjuvant therapy, and a longer length of tumor-vein involvement than the anastomosis group.

However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients with major complications (42.9% for allografts vs. 36.6% for anastomosis) or early failure at the reconstruction site (9.5% for allografts vs. 8.5% for anastomosis) between the two groups, Dr Kleive and his colleagues reported.

The proportion of patients with grade C stenosis at last available imaging scan was significantly higher in the allograft group (26/42 [61.9%] vs. 13 of 66 [19.7%] for the anastomosis group; P less than .01). A subgroup analysis of 10 patients in the allograft group showed the presence of donor-specific antibodies in all patients. This could indicate that graft rejection was a contributing factor to the statistically higher development of severe stenosis in allograft vs. anastomosis patients, the authors suggested.

“This study shows that the short-term outcome of SMV/PV reconstruction with interposed cold-stored cadaveric venous allografts is comparable to that of reconstruction with primary end-to-end anastomosis,” the researchers concluded.

Dr. Kleive and his colleagues reported that they had no conflicts of interest.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY: VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISEASES

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Cadevric allografts gave similar results to anastomosis for vein reconstruction during pancreatic tumor surgery.

Major finding: There was no statistically significant difference in the number of patients with major complications or early failure at the reconstruction site between the allograft and the anastomosis groups.

Data source: A retrospective review of all 171 patients undergoing pancreatic surgery with venous resection and reconstruction at a single center between January 2006 and December 2015.

Disclosures: The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.

Disqus Comments
Default

Bare metal stents: Rest in peace

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/04/2018 - 11:35

 

– Percutaneous coronary intervention using a contemporary drug-eluting stent on a shortened regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy proved significantly more effective and equally safe as a bare metal stent in elderly patients in the randomized, multicenter SENIOR trial.

“I think BMS [bare metal stents] should no longer be used as a strategy to reduce DAPT [dual antiplatelet therapy] duration in the elderly,” Olivier Varenne, MD, concluded in presenting the SENIOR findings at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics annual educational meeting.

Dr. Olivier Varenne
A panel of discussants felt that declaration didn’t go far enough.

“This trial adds to what I think is now a very large body of evidence showing that DES [drug-eluting stents] are the way to go, pretty much across the board, putting aside the economic factors that might come into play in certain regions of the world,” Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, commented at the meeting sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

“I think in general there’s really no good reason to use a BMS. I’d use a DES. I think DES is a winning strategy, whether it’s for a thrombotic lesion or an older patient,” added Dr. Bhatt, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston and executive director of international cardiovascular programs at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Martin B. Leon, MD, concurred.

“I cannot think of any indication for using a BMS anymore, other than cost considerations. I think this study is yet another nail in the coffin of BMS. I think they should be relegated to the past because they really have very little role in environments where DES – which are becoming much more cost-efficient – can be used,” said Dr. Leon, professor of medicine at Columbia University and director of the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York. Yet in contemporary practice many cardiologists turn to BMS for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), reasoning that the shorter DAPT duration recommended for BMS in the practice guidelines is attractive as a means of minimizing the risk of bleeding complications, which is typically high in the elderly.

The SENIOR trial demonstrates that using a modern DES in combination with the shortened 1- or 6-month DAPT duration typically reserved for BMS recipients results in fewer major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events with no increase in bleeding, compared with BMS. This is a finding of high clinical relevance because so many elderly patients undergo PCI; indeed, today one in four PCI patients in the United States is over age 75, explained Dr. Varenne of Cochin Hospital in Paris.

SENIOR was a single-blind, randomized trial of 1,200 PCI patients age 75 and older at 44 centers in nine countries. Their mean age was 81.4 years. This was essentially an all-comers trial: 45% of participants had an acute coronary syndrome, 55% had stable or silent CAD. If they had stable CAD, they were slated for 1 month of DAPT. If they had ACS, they got 6 months of DAPT. All participants were then randomized to PCI with either the thin-strut everolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer Synergy DES or the thin-strut Omega or Rebel BMS.

The primary composite efficacy endpoint was the 1-year rate of all-cause mortality, acute MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The rate was 11.6% in the DES group and 16.4% in the BMS group, for a 29% reduction in favor of the DES strategy and a favorably low number-needed-to-treat of 21. The difference in outcome was driven mainly by a higher ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization rate in the BMS group.

The 1-year rate of bleeding complications was 5% in each group. Probable or definite stent thrombosis occurred in 0.5% of the DES group and 1.4% of the BMS group at 1 year. Ten of the 11 cases of stent thrombosis in the study occurred during the first 30 days after PCI while the patients were on DAPT; the other case occurred on day 31, the day after DAPT was stopped.

Discussant Eric D. Peterson, MD, applauded Dr. Varenne and his coinvestigators for conducting a study focused on elderly individuals, an understudied population largely excluded from the landmark clinical trials in interventional cardiology.

He found the study convincing: “My takeaway is DES is better than BMS. As it is in young people, it continues in old.”

But the study leaves two important questions unanswered: Is the Synergy stent the best DES in the elderly, and what is the best duration of DAPT therapy? Ideally, the SENIOR trial would have included a study arm with the standard 6- and 12-month DAPT durations recommended in the American guidelines for DES recipients with stable and unstable CAD, respectively, observed Dr. Peterson, professor of medicine at Duke University in Durham, N.C., and director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute.

Dr. Varenne replied that SENIOR wasn’t designed as a DAPT duration trial. DAPT duration wasn’t randomized. But other planned and ongoing studies are attempting to define the best DAPT durations in various patient subsets.

Dr. Bhatt said he believes the superiority of contemporary DES over modern BMS is a class effect.

The SENIOR trial was funded by Boston Scientific. Dr. Varenne reported receiving lecture fees from that company as well as Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, and Servier within the past year.

[email protected]

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event
Related Articles

 

– Percutaneous coronary intervention using a contemporary drug-eluting stent on a shortened regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy proved significantly more effective and equally safe as a bare metal stent in elderly patients in the randomized, multicenter SENIOR trial.

“I think BMS [bare metal stents] should no longer be used as a strategy to reduce DAPT [dual antiplatelet therapy] duration in the elderly,” Olivier Varenne, MD, concluded in presenting the SENIOR findings at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics annual educational meeting.

Dr. Olivier Varenne
A panel of discussants felt that declaration didn’t go far enough.

“This trial adds to what I think is now a very large body of evidence showing that DES [drug-eluting stents] are the way to go, pretty much across the board, putting aside the economic factors that might come into play in certain regions of the world,” Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, commented at the meeting sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

“I think in general there’s really no good reason to use a BMS. I’d use a DES. I think DES is a winning strategy, whether it’s for a thrombotic lesion or an older patient,” added Dr. Bhatt, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston and executive director of international cardiovascular programs at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Martin B. Leon, MD, concurred.

“I cannot think of any indication for using a BMS anymore, other than cost considerations. I think this study is yet another nail in the coffin of BMS. I think they should be relegated to the past because they really have very little role in environments where DES – which are becoming much more cost-efficient – can be used,” said Dr. Leon, professor of medicine at Columbia University and director of the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York. Yet in contemporary practice many cardiologists turn to BMS for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), reasoning that the shorter DAPT duration recommended for BMS in the practice guidelines is attractive as a means of minimizing the risk of bleeding complications, which is typically high in the elderly.

The SENIOR trial demonstrates that using a modern DES in combination with the shortened 1- or 6-month DAPT duration typically reserved for BMS recipients results in fewer major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events with no increase in bleeding, compared with BMS. This is a finding of high clinical relevance because so many elderly patients undergo PCI; indeed, today one in four PCI patients in the United States is over age 75, explained Dr. Varenne of Cochin Hospital in Paris.

SENIOR was a single-blind, randomized trial of 1,200 PCI patients age 75 and older at 44 centers in nine countries. Their mean age was 81.4 years. This was essentially an all-comers trial: 45% of participants had an acute coronary syndrome, 55% had stable or silent CAD. If they had stable CAD, they were slated for 1 month of DAPT. If they had ACS, they got 6 months of DAPT. All participants were then randomized to PCI with either the thin-strut everolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer Synergy DES or the thin-strut Omega or Rebel BMS.

The primary composite efficacy endpoint was the 1-year rate of all-cause mortality, acute MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The rate was 11.6% in the DES group and 16.4% in the BMS group, for a 29% reduction in favor of the DES strategy and a favorably low number-needed-to-treat of 21. The difference in outcome was driven mainly by a higher ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization rate in the BMS group.

The 1-year rate of bleeding complications was 5% in each group. Probable or definite stent thrombosis occurred in 0.5% of the DES group and 1.4% of the BMS group at 1 year. Ten of the 11 cases of stent thrombosis in the study occurred during the first 30 days after PCI while the patients were on DAPT; the other case occurred on day 31, the day after DAPT was stopped.

Discussant Eric D. Peterson, MD, applauded Dr. Varenne and his coinvestigators for conducting a study focused on elderly individuals, an understudied population largely excluded from the landmark clinical trials in interventional cardiology.

He found the study convincing: “My takeaway is DES is better than BMS. As it is in young people, it continues in old.”

But the study leaves two important questions unanswered: Is the Synergy stent the best DES in the elderly, and what is the best duration of DAPT therapy? Ideally, the SENIOR trial would have included a study arm with the standard 6- and 12-month DAPT durations recommended in the American guidelines for DES recipients with stable and unstable CAD, respectively, observed Dr. Peterson, professor of medicine at Duke University in Durham, N.C., and director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute.

Dr. Varenne replied that SENIOR wasn’t designed as a DAPT duration trial. DAPT duration wasn’t randomized. But other planned and ongoing studies are attempting to define the best DAPT durations in various patient subsets.

Dr. Bhatt said he believes the superiority of contemporary DES over modern BMS is a class effect.

The SENIOR trial was funded by Boston Scientific. Dr. Varenne reported receiving lecture fees from that company as well as Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, and Servier within the past year.

[email protected]

 

– Percutaneous coronary intervention using a contemporary drug-eluting stent on a shortened regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy proved significantly more effective and equally safe as a bare metal stent in elderly patients in the randomized, multicenter SENIOR trial.

“I think BMS [bare metal stents] should no longer be used as a strategy to reduce DAPT [dual antiplatelet therapy] duration in the elderly,” Olivier Varenne, MD, concluded in presenting the SENIOR findings at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics annual educational meeting.

Dr. Olivier Varenne
A panel of discussants felt that declaration didn’t go far enough.

“This trial adds to what I think is now a very large body of evidence showing that DES [drug-eluting stents] are the way to go, pretty much across the board, putting aside the economic factors that might come into play in certain regions of the world,” Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, commented at the meeting sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation.

“I think in general there’s really no good reason to use a BMS. I’d use a DES. I think DES is a winning strategy, whether it’s for a thrombotic lesion or an older patient,” added Dr. Bhatt, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School in Boston and executive director of international cardiovascular programs at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Martin B. Leon, MD, concurred.

“I cannot think of any indication for using a BMS anymore, other than cost considerations. I think this study is yet another nail in the coffin of BMS. I think they should be relegated to the past because they really have very little role in environments where DES – which are becoming much more cost-efficient – can be used,” said Dr. Leon, professor of medicine at Columbia University and director of the Center for Interventional Vascular Therapy at New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York. Yet in contemporary practice many cardiologists turn to BMS for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), reasoning that the shorter DAPT duration recommended for BMS in the practice guidelines is attractive as a means of minimizing the risk of bleeding complications, which is typically high in the elderly.

The SENIOR trial demonstrates that using a modern DES in combination with the shortened 1- or 6-month DAPT duration typically reserved for BMS recipients results in fewer major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events with no increase in bleeding, compared with BMS. This is a finding of high clinical relevance because so many elderly patients undergo PCI; indeed, today one in four PCI patients in the United States is over age 75, explained Dr. Varenne of Cochin Hospital in Paris.

SENIOR was a single-blind, randomized trial of 1,200 PCI patients age 75 and older at 44 centers in nine countries. Their mean age was 81.4 years. This was essentially an all-comers trial: 45% of participants had an acute coronary syndrome, 55% had stable or silent CAD. If they had stable CAD, they were slated for 1 month of DAPT. If they had ACS, they got 6 months of DAPT. All participants were then randomized to PCI with either the thin-strut everolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer Synergy DES or the thin-strut Omega or Rebel BMS.

The primary composite efficacy endpoint was the 1-year rate of all-cause mortality, acute MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The rate was 11.6% in the DES group and 16.4% in the BMS group, for a 29% reduction in favor of the DES strategy and a favorably low number-needed-to-treat of 21. The difference in outcome was driven mainly by a higher ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization rate in the BMS group.

The 1-year rate of bleeding complications was 5% in each group. Probable or definite stent thrombosis occurred in 0.5% of the DES group and 1.4% of the BMS group at 1 year. Ten of the 11 cases of stent thrombosis in the study occurred during the first 30 days after PCI while the patients were on DAPT; the other case occurred on day 31, the day after DAPT was stopped.

Discussant Eric D. Peterson, MD, applauded Dr. Varenne and his coinvestigators for conducting a study focused on elderly individuals, an understudied population largely excluded from the landmark clinical trials in interventional cardiology.

He found the study convincing: “My takeaway is DES is better than BMS. As it is in young people, it continues in old.”

But the study leaves two important questions unanswered: Is the Synergy stent the best DES in the elderly, and what is the best duration of DAPT therapy? Ideally, the SENIOR trial would have included a study arm with the standard 6- and 12-month DAPT durations recommended in the American guidelines for DES recipients with stable and unstable CAD, respectively, observed Dr. Peterson, professor of medicine at Duke University in Durham, N.C., and director of the Duke Clinical Research Institute.

Dr. Varenne replied that SENIOR wasn’t designed as a DAPT duration trial. DAPT duration wasn’t randomized. But other planned and ongoing studies are attempting to define the best DAPT durations in various patient subsets.

Dr. Bhatt said he believes the superiority of contemporary DES over modern BMS is a class effect.

The SENIOR trial was funded by Boston Scientific. Dr. Varenne reported receiving lecture fees from that company as well as Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, and Servier within the past year.

[email protected]

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

AT TCT 2017

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: New clinical trial results were called the final nail in the coffin for the use of bare metal stents in contemporary interventional cardiology.

Major finding: The number of elderly patients with CAD who would need to be treated with a contemporary drug-eluting stent backed by a shortened DAPT regimen instead of a modern-era bare metal stent in order to avoid one additional major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event over the course of a year is 21.

Data source: This randomized, prospective, single-blind trial included 1,200 patients age 75 or older who underwent PCI at 44 centers in nine countries.

Disclosures: The SENIOR trial was funded by Boston Scientific. The presenter reported receiving lecture fees from that company as well as Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, and Servier within the past year.

Disqus Comments
Default

New buprenorphine formulation approved for medication-assisted treatment

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 17:13

 



The Food and Drug Administration has approved an extended-release, subcutaneous injection formulation of buprenorphine for use in treating moderate to severe opioid use disorder (OUD), the manufacturer of the drug announced Nov. 30.

The new product, called Sublocade, is a monthly injection intended for use in patients who have already begun treatment of OUD with transmucosal buprenorphine products, followed by a dose adjustment for a minimum of 7 days. Sublocade contains the partial mu-opioid agonist buprenorphine. By administering a consistent level of buprenorphine into the body, it ensures that levels of buprenorphine are delivered to the mu-opioid receptors, diminishing the effects of opioids, including the euphoric sensations associated with opioid use. During the clinical trial program, buprenorphine plasma concentrations of 2-3 ng/mL were found to bind to greater than 70% of mu-opioid receptors.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
“In the Opioid Blockade Study, Sublocade achieved complete blockade of drug-liking effects for a full month in most patients. Sublocade is the first and only therapy that, at steady state, delivers buprenorphine at a sustained rate of at least 2 ng/mL over a 1-month period,” Shaun Thaxter, chief executive officer of the drug’s manufacturer, Indivior, said in a press release. “The urgency for this new treatment has never been greater, as the U.S. opioid crisis has been declared a national public health emergency. Sublocade’s approval is an important step forward for patients, families, and communities battling the opioid epidemic.”

According to a statement from the FDA, Sublocade will be distributed only to health care providers as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to ensure that the product is not distributed directly to patients. Sublocade should be administered only by a health care professional. Self-injection of Sublocade into the blood stream instead of subcutaneously could lead to occlusion of blood vessels and embolism, according to one of the drug’s boxed warnings. It also should be used as part of a complete treatment program that includes counseling and psychosocial support.

The FDA is also requiring the manufacturer to conduct postmarketing studies to assess which patients would benefit from a higher dosing regimen, to determine whether Sublocade can be safely initiated without a dose stabilization period of sublingual buprenorphine, to assess the feasibility of administering Sublocade at a longer inter-dose interval than once monthly, and to determine a process for transitioning patients with long-term stability on a transmucosal buprenorphine dose to a monthly dose of Sublocade without the use of a higher dose for the first 2 months of treatment.

At recent joint meetings of the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committees, panelists voted on Oct. 31 to recommend approval of Sublocade and on Nov. 1 for another subcutaneous buprenorphine injection formulation. These actions have not gone unnoticed by the American Medical Association.

“The AMA enthusiastically supports Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb’s efforts to advance policies and actions to treat those suffering from an opioid use disorder,” Patrice Harris, MD, immediate past chair of the American Medical Association Board of Trustees and a member of the AMA Opioid Task Force, said in a statement. “We also second his bold acknowledgment that criminal justice systems should offer [medication-assisted treatment] to those being detained. As he points out, ‘At the very moment when the criminal justice system could be dramatically lowering the risk of overdose, it is creating the conditions of reduced tolerance to opioids that substantially raises the risk of death upon release.’ With his clear explanation of the problem and solution, this situation can be remedied.”

 

Publications
Topics
Sections
Related Articles

 



The Food and Drug Administration has approved an extended-release, subcutaneous injection formulation of buprenorphine for use in treating moderate to severe opioid use disorder (OUD), the manufacturer of the drug announced Nov. 30.

The new product, called Sublocade, is a monthly injection intended for use in patients who have already begun treatment of OUD with transmucosal buprenorphine products, followed by a dose adjustment for a minimum of 7 days. Sublocade contains the partial mu-opioid agonist buprenorphine. By administering a consistent level of buprenorphine into the body, it ensures that levels of buprenorphine are delivered to the mu-opioid receptors, diminishing the effects of opioids, including the euphoric sensations associated with opioid use. During the clinical trial program, buprenorphine plasma concentrations of 2-3 ng/mL were found to bind to greater than 70% of mu-opioid receptors.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
“In the Opioid Blockade Study, Sublocade achieved complete blockade of drug-liking effects for a full month in most patients. Sublocade is the first and only therapy that, at steady state, delivers buprenorphine at a sustained rate of at least 2 ng/mL over a 1-month period,” Shaun Thaxter, chief executive officer of the drug’s manufacturer, Indivior, said in a press release. “The urgency for this new treatment has never been greater, as the U.S. opioid crisis has been declared a national public health emergency. Sublocade’s approval is an important step forward for patients, families, and communities battling the opioid epidemic.”

According to a statement from the FDA, Sublocade will be distributed only to health care providers as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to ensure that the product is not distributed directly to patients. Sublocade should be administered only by a health care professional. Self-injection of Sublocade into the blood stream instead of subcutaneously could lead to occlusion of blood vessels and embolism, according to one of the drug’s boxed warnings. It also should be used as part of a complete treatment program that includes counseling and psychosocial support.

The FDA is also requiring the manufacturer to conduct postmarketing studies to assess which patients would benefit from a higher dosing regimen, to determine whether Sublocade can be safely initiated without a dose stabilization period of sublingual buprenorphine, to assess the feasibility of administering Sublocade at a longer inter-dose interval than once monthly, and to determine a process for transitioning patients with long-term stability on a transmucosal buprenorphine dose to a monthly dose of Sublocade without the use of a higher dose for the first 2 months of treatment.

At recent joint meetings of the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committees, panelists voted on Oct. 31 to recommend approval of Sublocade and on Nov. 1 for another subcutaneous buprenorphine injection formulation. These actions have not gone unnoticed by the American Medical Association.

“The AMA enthusiastically supports Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb’s efforts to advance policies and actions to treat those suffering from an opioid use disorder,” Patrice Harris, MD, immediate past chair of the American Medical Association Board of Trustees and a member of the AMA Opioid Task Force, said in a statement. “We also second his bold acknowledgment that criminal justice systems should offer [medication-assisted treatment] to those being detained. As he points out, ‘At the very moment when the criminal justice system could be dramatically lowering the risk of overdose, it is creating the conditions of reduced tolerance to opioids that substantially raises the risk of death upon release.’ With his clear explanation of the problem and solution, this situation can be remedied.”

 

 



The Food and Drug Administration has approved an extended-release, subcutaneous injection formulation of buprenorphine for use in treating moderate to severe opioid use disorder (OUD), the manufacturer of the drug announced Nov. 30.

The new product, called Sublocade, is a monthly injection intended for use in patients who have already begun treatment of OUD with transmucosal buprenorphine products, followed by a dose adjustment for a minimum of 7 days. Sublocade contains the partial mu-opioid agonist buprenorphine. By administering a consistent level of buprenorphine into the body, it ensures that levels of buprenorphine are delivered to the mu-opioid receptors, diminishing the effects of opioids, including the euphoric sensations associated with opioid use. During the clinical trial program, buprenorphine plasma concentrations of 2-3 ng/mL were found to bind to greater than 70% of mu-opioid receptors.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
“In the Opioid Blockade Study, Sublocade achieved complete blockade of drug-liking effects for a full month in most patients. Sublocade is the first and only therapy that, at steady state, delivers buprenorphine at a sustained rate of at least 2 ng/mL over a 1-month period,” Shaun Thaxter, chief executive officer of the drug’s manufacturer, Indivior, said in a press release. “The urgency for this new treatment has never been greater, as the U.S. opioid crisis has been declared a national public health emergency. Sublocade’s approval is an important step forward for patients, families, and communities battling the opioid epidemic.”

According to a statement from the FDA, Sublocade will be distributed only to health care providers as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to ensure that the product is not distributed directly to patients. Sublocade should be administered only by a health care professional. Self-injection of Sublocade into the blood stream instead of subcutaneously could lead to occlusion of blood vessels and embolism, according to one of the drug’s boxed warnings. It also should be used as part of a complete treatment program that includes counseling and psychosocial support.

The FDA is also requiring the manufacturer to conduct postmarketing studies to assess which patients would benefit from a higher dosing regimen, to determine whether Sublocade can be safely initiated without a dose stabilization period of sublingual buprenorphine, to assess the feasibility of administering Sublocade at a longer inter-dose interval than once monthly, and to determine a process for transitioning patients with long-term stability on a transmucosal buprenorphine dose to a monthly dose of Sublocade without the use of a higher dose for the first 2 months of treatment.

At recent joint meetings of the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs and Drug Safety and Risk Management advisory committees, panelists voted on Oct. 31 to recommend approval of Sublocade and on Nov. 1 for another subcutaneous buprenorphine injection formulation. These actions have not gone unnoticed by the American Medical Association.

“The AMA enthusiastically supports Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb’s efforts to advance policies and actions to treat those suffering from an opioid use disorder,” Patrice Harris, MD, immediate past chair of the American Medical Association Board of Trustees and a member of the AMA Opioid Task Force, said in a statement. “We also second his bold acknowledgment that criminal justice systems should offer [medication-assisted treatment] to those being detained. As he points out, ‘At the very moment when the criminal justice system could be dramatically lowering the risk of overdose, it is creating the conditions of reduced tolerance to opioids that substantially raises the risk of death upon release.’ With his clear explanation of the problem and solution, this situation can be remedied.”

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default