Health care spending for a family of four covered by insurance from a large employer in the United States averaged almost $23,000 in 2018, the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) said.

That average cost represents the employer’s contribution to the insurance premium ($15,159), along with the employee’s premium ($4,706) and the family’s out-of-pocket spending ($3,020), according to a KFF analysis of IBM MarketScan data and the 2018 KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey.

“Buying a new car every year would be a very impractical expense. It would also be cheaper than a year’s worth of health care for a family,” KFF President and CEO Drew Altman, PhD, wrote in his Axios column.

A little searching on the Kelley Blue Book Car Finder shows that the average family could have purchased a pretty nice new vehicle for the $22,885 that was spent on their health care in 2018:

• Mazda6 sedan: $22,845.
• Mini 2-door hatchback: $22,450.
• Jeep Renegade SUV: $21,040.
• Nissan Frontier king cab pickup: $20,035.

“The cost-shifting and complexity of health insurance can hide its high cost, which crowds out families’ other needs and depresses workers’ wages,” Dr. Altman said.

[email protected]

Health care spending for a family of four covered by insurance from a large employer in the United States averaged almost $23,000 in 2018, the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) said.

That average cost represents the employer’s contribution to the insurance premium ($15,159), along with the employee’s premium ($4,706) and the family’s out-of-pocket spending ($3,020), according to a KFF analysis of IBM MarketScan data and the 2018 KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey.

“Buying a new car every year would be a very impractical expense. It would also be cheaper than a year’s worth of health care for a family,” KFF President and CEO Drew Altman, PhD, wrote in his Axios column.

A little searching on the Kelley Blue Book Car Finder shows that the average family could have purchased a pretty nice new vehicle for the $22,885 that was spent on their health care in 2018:

• Mazda6 sedan: $22,845.
• Mini 2-door hatchback: $22,450.
• Jeep Renegade SUV: $21,040.
• Nissan Frontier king cab pickup: $20,035.

“The cost-shifting and complexity of health insurance can hide its high cost, which crowds out families’ other needs and depresses workers’ wages,” Dr. Altman said.

[email protected]

Health care spending for a family of four covered by insurance from a large employer in the United States averaged almost $23,000 in 2018, the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) said.

That average cost represents the employer’s contribution to the insurance premium ($15,159), along with the employee’s premium ($4,706) and the family’s out-of-pocket spending ($3,020), according to a KFF analysis of IBM MarketScan data and the 2018 KFF Employer Health Benefits Survey.

“Buying a new car every year would be a very impractical expense. It would also be cheaper than a year’s worth of health care for a family,” KFF President and CEO Drew Altman, PhD, wrote in his Axios column.

A little searching on the Kelley Blue Book Car Finder shows that the average family could have purchased a pretty nice new vehicle for the $22,885 that was spent on their health care in 2018:

• Mazda6 sedan: $22,845.
• Mini 2-door hatchback: $22,450.
• Jeep Renegade SUV: $21,040.
• Nissan Frontier king cab pickup: $20,035.

“The cost-shifting and complexity of health insurance can hide its high cost, which crowds out families’ other needs and depresses workers’ wages,” Dr. Altman said.

[email protected]

All patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should undergo molecular testing for targetable mutations and for tumor expression of the programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein, authors of a review of systemic therapies for NSCLC recommend.

Their opinion is based on evidence showing that 5-year overall survival rate for patients whose tumors have high levels of PD-L1 expression now exceeds 25%, and that patients with ALK-positive tumors have 5-year overall survival rates over 40%. In contrast, 5-year survival rates for patients with metastatic NSCLC prior to the 21st century were less than 5%, according to Kathryn C. Arbour, MD, and Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“Improved understanding of the biology and molecular subtypes of non–small cell lung cancer have led to more biomarker-directed therapies for patients with metastatic disease. These biomarker-directed therapies and newer empirical treatment regimens have improved overall survival for patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer,” they wrote in JAMA.

The authors reviewed published studies of clinical trials of medical therapies for NSCLC, including articles on randomized trials, nonrandomized trials leading to practice changes or regulatory approval of new therapies for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and clinical practice guidelines.

Their review showed that approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC have molecular alterations predictive of response to treatment, such as mutations in EGFR, the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor; rearrangements in the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 genes; and mutations in BRAF V600E.

Patients with somatic activating mutations in EGFR, which occur in approximately 20% of those with advanced NSCLC, have better progression-free survival when treated with an EGFR-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib (Iressa), erlotinib (Tarceva), or afatinib (Gilotrif), compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Similarly, they noted, patients with ALK rearrangements leading to overexpression of the ALK protein had better overall response rates and progression-free survival when treated with the ALK inhibitor crizotinib (Xalkori), compared with patients with ALK rearrangements treated with pemetrexed and a platinum agent.

For some patients without targetable mutations, immune checkpoint inhibitors either alone or in combination with chemotherapy have resulted in improvements in overall survival.

“These advances are substantial, but long-term durable responses remain uncommon for most patients. These insights into treating metastatic disease have informed the design of trials for new treatment strategies among patients with early-stage disease. The goal of NSCLC research is to understand and address mechanisms of resistant and refractory disease in patients with advanced disease and, ultimately, to increase cure rates,” the reviewers wrote.

The review was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to Memorial Sloan Kettering. Dr. Arbour reported serving as a consultant to AstraZeneca and nonfinancial research support from Novartis and Takeda. Dr. Riely reported grants and nonfinancial support from Pfizer, Roche/Genentech/Chugai, Novartis, Merck, and Takeda; a patent pending for an alternate dosing of erlotinib for which he has no right to royalties; and payments from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network to participate in a committee overseeing solicitation and selection of grants to be awarded by AstraZeneca.

SOURCE: Arbour KC and Riely GJ. JAMA. 2019;322(8):764-74.

All patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should undergo molecular testing for targetable mutations and for tumor expression of the programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein, authors of a review of systemic therapies for NSCLC recommend.

Their opinion is based on evidence showing that 5-year overall survival rate for patients whose tumors have high levels of PD-L1 expression now exceeds 25%, and that patients with ALK-positive tumors have 5-year overall survival rates over 40%. In contrast, 5-year survival rates for patients with metastatic NSCLC prior to the 21st century were less than 5%, according to Kathryn C. Arbour, MD, and Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“Improved understanding of the biology and molecular subtypes of non–small cell lung cancer have led to more biomarker-directed therapies for patients with metastatic disease. These biomarker-directed therapies and newer empirical treatment regimens have improved overall survival for patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer,” they wrote in JAMA.

The authors reviewed published studies of clinical trials of medical therapies for NSCLC, including articles on randomized trials, nonrandomized trials leading to practice changes or regulatory approval of new therapies for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and clinical practice guidelines.

Their review showed that approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC have molecular alterations predictive of response to treatment, such as mutations in EGFR, the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor; rearrangements in the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 genes; and mutations in BRAF V600E.

Patients with somatic activating mutations in EGFR, which occur in approximately 20% of those with advanced NSCLC, have better progression-free survival when treated with an EGFR-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib (Iressa), erlotinib (Tarceva), or afatinib (Gilotrif), compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Similarly, they noted, patients with ALK rearrangements leading to overexpression of the ALK protein had better overall response rates and progression-free survival when treated with the ALK inhibitor crizotinib (Xalkori), compared with patients with ALK rearrangements treated with pemetrexed and a platinum agent.

For some patients without targetable mutations, immune checkpoint inhibitors either alone or in combination with chemotherapy have resulted in improvements in overall survival.

“These advances are substantial, but long-term durable responses remain uncommon for most patients. These insights into treating metastatic disease have informed the design of trials for new treatment strategies among patients with early-stage disease. The goal of NSCLC research is to understand and address mechanisms of resistant and refractory disease in patients with advanced disease and, ultimately, to increase cure rates,” the reviewers wrote.

The review was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to Memorial Sloan Kettering. Dr. Arbour reported serving as a consultant to AstraZeneca and nonfinancial research support from Novartis and Takeda. Dr. Riely reported grants and nonfinancial support from Pfizer, Roche/Genentech/Chugai, Novartis, Merck, and Takeda; a patent pending for an alternate dosing of erlotinib for which he has no right to royalties; and payments from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network to participate in a committee overseeing solicitation and selection of grants to be awarded by AstraZeneca.

SOURCE: Arbour KC and Riely GJ. JAMA. 2019;322(8):764-74.

All patients with locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should undergo molecular testing for targetable mutations and for tumor expression of the programmed death–ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein, authors of a review of systemic therapies for NSCLC recommend.

Their opinion is based on evidence showing that 5-year overall survival rate for patients whose tumors have high levels of PD-L1 expression now exceeds 25%, and that patients with ALK-positive tumors have 5-year overall survival rates over 40%. In contrast, 5-year survival rates for patients with metastatic NSCLC prior to the 21st century were less than 5%, according to Kathryn C. Arbour, MD, and Gregory J. Riely, MD, PhD, from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York.

“Improved understanding of the biology and molecular subtypes of non–small cell lung cancer have led to more biomarker-directed therapies for patients with metastatic disease. These biomarker-directed therapies and newer empirical treatment regimens have improved overall survival for patients with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer,” they wrote in JAMA.

The authors reviewed published studies of clinical trials of medical therapies for NSCLC, including articles on randomized trials, nonrandomized trials leading to practice changes or regulatory approval of new therapies for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, and clinical practice guidelines.

Their review showed that approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC have molecular alterations predictive of response to treatment, such as mutations in EGFR, the gene encoding for epidermal growth factor receptor; rearrangements in the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 genes; and mutations in BRAF V600E.

Patients with somatic activating mutations in EGFR, which occur in approximately 20% of those with advanced NSCLC, have better progression-free survival when treated with an EGFR-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as gefitinib (Iressa), erlotinib (Tarceva), or afatinib (Gilotrif), compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Similarly, they noted, patients with ALK rearrangements leading to overexpression of the ALK protein had better overall response rates and progression-free survival when treated with the ALK inhibitor crizotinib (Xalkori), compared with patients with ALK rearrangements treated with pemetrexed and a platinum agent.

For some patients without targetable mutations, immune checkpoint inhibitors either alone or in combination with chemotherapy have resulted in improvements in overall survival.

“These advances are substantial, but long-term durable responses remain uncommon for most patients. These insights into treating metastatic disease have informed the design of trials for new treatment strategies among patients with early-stage disease. The goal of NSCLC research is to understand and address mechanisms of resistant and refractory disease in patients with advanced disease and, ultimately, to increase cure rates,” the reviewers wrote.

The review was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute to Memorial Sloan Kettering. Dr. Arbour reported serving as a consultant to AstraZeneca and nonfinancial research support from Novartis and Takeda. Dr. Riely reported grants and nonfinancial support from Pfizer, Roche/Genentech/Chugai, Novartis, Merck, and Takeda; a patent pending for an alternate dosing of erlotinib for which he has no right to royalties; and payments from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network to participate in a committee overseeing solicitation and selection of grants to be awarded by AstraZeneca.

SOURCE: Arbour KC and Riely GJ. JAMA. 2019;322(8):764-74.

When asked about my decision to choose pediatrics over the other specialty opportunities I was being offered, I have always answered that my choice was primarily based on my desire to work with children. That affinity certainly didn’t stem from my experience with my sister who is 7 years my junior. By her own admission, she was a bratty little thing and a major annoyance during my journey through adolescence. However, during the summers of high school and college I worked as a lifeguard, and one of my duties was to teach swimming classes. The joy and reward of watching children overcome their fear of the water and become competent swimmers left a positive impression, which was in stark contrast to the few classes of adult nonswimmers my coworkers and I taught. Our success rate with adults was pretty close to zero.

michaeljung/iStock/Getty Images Plus

If I was going to spend my time and effort becoming a physician, I decided I wanted to be working with patients with the high potential for positive change and ones who had yet to accumulate a several decades long list of bad health habits. I wanted to be practicing in situations well before the die had been cast.

With this background in mind, you can understand why I was drawn to a recent article in the Harvard Gazette titled “Social spending on kids yields the biggest bang for the buck,” by Clea Simon. The article describes a recent study by Opportunity Insights, a Harvard-based institute of policy analysts and social scientists (“A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies” by Nathaniel Hendren, PhD, and Ben Sprung-Keyser). Using computer algorithms capable of mining large pools of data, the researchers looked at 133 government policy changes over the last 50 years and compared the long-term results of those changes by assessing dollars spent against those returned in the form of tax revenue.

The Harvard article quotes Dr. Hendren as saying, “The policies that have historically invested in kids tend to be the biggest bang for the buck.” This association was most impressive for children who came from lower-income families. This was especially true for programs that aimed at improving child health and increasing educational attainment.

Of course, these observations don’t come as a surprise to those of us who have accepted the challenge of improving the health of children. But it’s always nice to hear some new data that warms our hearts and reinforces our commitment to building healthy communities by focusing our efforts on its youngest members.

However, the paper did provide a finding that disappointed me. This big data analysis revealed that programs aimed at encouraging young people to attend college produced higher future earnings than did those focused on job training. I guess this shouldn’t be much of a surprise, but I believe we have been overemphasizing college track programs when we should be destigmatizing a career path in one of the trades. It may be that job training has been poorly done or at least not flexible enough to meet the changing demands of industry.

The investigators were surprised that their analysis demonstrated that policy changes targeted at children through their middle and high school years and even into college yielded return on investment at least as great if not greater than some successful preschool programs. Dr. Hendren responded to this finding by observing that “it’s never too late.” However, I think his comment deserves the loud and clear caveat, “as long as we are still talking about children.”

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

When asked about my decision to choose pediatrics over the other specialty opportunities I was being offered, I have always answered that my choice was primarily based on my desire to work with children. That affinity certainly didn’t stem from my experience with my sister who is 7 years my junior. By her own admission, she was a bratty little thing and a major annoyance during my journey through adolescence. However, during the summers of high school and college I worked as a lifeguard, and one of my duties was to teach swimming classes. The joy and reward of watching children overcome their fear of the water and become competent swimmers left a positive impression, which was in stark contrast to the few classes of adult nonswimmers my coworkers and I taught. Our success rate with adults was pretty close to zero.

michaeljung/iStock/Getty Images Plus

If I was going to spend my time and effort becoming a physician, I decided I wanted to be working with patients with the high potential for positive change and ones who had yet to accumulate a several decades long list of bad health habits. I wanted to be practicing in situations well before the die had been cast.

With this background in mind, you can understand why I was drawn to a recent article in the Harvard Gazette titled “Social spending on kids yields the biggest bang for the buck,” by Clea Simon. The article describes a recent study by Opportunity Insights, a Harvard-based institute of policy analysts and social scientists (“A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies” by Nathaniel Hendren, PhD, and Ben Sprung-Keyser). Using computer algorithms capable of mining large pools of data, the researchers looked at 133 government policy changes over the last 50 years and compared the long-term results of those changes by assessing dollars spent against those returned in the form of tax revenue.

The Harvard article quotes Dr. Hendren as saying, “The policies that have historically invested in kids tend to be the biggest bang for the buck.” This association was most impressive for children who came from lower-income families. This was especially true for programs that aimed at improving child health and increasing educational attainment.

Of course, these observations don’t come as a surprise to those of us who have accepted the challenge of improving the health of children. But it’s always nice to hear some new data that warms our hearts and reinforces our commitment to building healthy communities by focusing our efforts on its youngest members.

However, the paper did provide a finding that disappointed me. This big data analysis revealed that programs aimed at encouraging young people to attend college produced higher future earnings than did those focused on job training. I guess this shouldn’t be much of a surprise, but I believe we have been overemphasizing college track programs when we should be destigmatizing a career path in one of the trades. It may be that job training has been poorly done or at least not flexible enough to meet the changing demands of industry.

The investigators were surprised that their analysis demonstrated that policy changes targeted at children through their middle and high school years and even into college yielded return on investment at least as great if not greater than some successful preschool programs. Dr. Hendren responded to this finding by observing that “it’s never too late.” However, I think his comment deserves the loud and clear caveat, “as long as we are still talking about children.”

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

When asked about my decision to choose pediatrics over the other specialty opportunities I was being offered, I have always answered that my choice was primarily based on my desire to work with children. That affinity certainly didn’t stem from my experience with my sister who is 7 years my junior. By her own admission, she was a bratty little thing and a major annoyance during my journey through adolescence. However, during the summers of high school and college I worked as a lifeguard, and one of my duties was to teach swimming classes. The joy and reward of watching children overcome their fear of the water and become competent swimmers left a positive impression, which was in stark contrast to the few classes of adult nonswimmers my coworkers and I taught. Our success rate with adults was pretty close to zero.

michaeljung/iStock/Getty Images Plus

If I was going to spend my time and effort becoming a physician, I decided I wanted to be working with patients with the high potential for positive change and ones who had yet to accumulate a several decades long list of bad health habits. I wanted to be practicing in situations well before the die had been cast.

With this background in mind, you can understand why I was drawn to a recent article in the Harvard Gazette titled “Social spending on kids yields the biggest bang for the buck,” by Clea Simon. The article describes a recent study by Opportunity Insights, a Harvard-based institute of policy analysts and social scientists (“A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies” by Nathaniel Hendren, PhD, and Ben Sprung-Keyser). Using computer algorithms capable of mining large pools of data, the researchers looked at 133 government policy changes over the last 50 years and compared the long-term results of those changes by assessing dollars spent against those returned in the form of tax revenue.

The Harvard article quotes Dr. Hendren as saying, “The policies that have historically invested in kids tend to be the biggest bang for the buck.” This association was most impressive for children who came from lower-income families. This was especially true for programs that aimed at improving child health and increasing educational attainment.

Of course, these observations don’t come as a surprise to those of us who have accepted the challenge of improving the health of children. But it’s always nice to hear some new data that warms our hearts and reinforces our commitment to building healthy communities by focusing our efforts on its youngest members.

However, the paper did provide a finding that disappointed me. This big data analysis revealed that programs aimed at encouraging young people to attend college produced higher future earnings than did those focused on job training. I guess this shouldn’t be much of a surprise, but I believe we have been overemphasizing college track programs when we should be destigmatizing a career path in one of the trades. It may be that job training has been poorly done or at least not flexible enough to meet the changing demands of industry.

The investigators were surprised that their analysis demonstrated that policy changes targeted at children through their middle and high school years and even into college yielded return on investment at least as great if not greater than some successful preschool programs. Dr. Hendren responded to this finding by observing that “it’s never too late.” However, I think his comment deserves the loud and clear caveat, “as long as we are still talking about children.”

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine, for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

The combination of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and neratinib shows promise in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, according to results from a phase 1b trial.

“The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination in patients previously treated with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab,” wrote Jame Abraham, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The open-label, dose-escalation study included 27 women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had hormone receptor–positive or hormone receptor–negative disease. All participants had demonstrated disease progression, despite prior treatment with combination pertuzumab and trastuzumab, plus a taxane. Among 19 response-evaluable patients, 12 patients (63%) had an objective response. Responses were observed across all neratinib doses, including a complete response in three patients, and partial response in nine patients.

“Deep and more durable responses occurred in patients with cell-free DNA ERBB2 amplification,” Dr. Abraham and associates noted.

“Alterations in the expression of specific HER2 species in ERBB2-amplified cancers, including p95HER2, may have therapeutic implications and require further investigation,” they wrote.

With respect to neratinib dosing, the initial cohort was started at 120 mg daily, which was increased to 240 mg daily in successive cohorts using a 3+3 design. T-DM1 was administered every 3 weeks at 3.6 mg/kg.

After analysis, the researchers proposed a phase 2 dose of neratinib 160 mg once daily and T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg for the combination.

Dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea was reported in a total of six patients, which was most pronounced in cycle 1. At the phase 2 recommended dose of neratinib, 7 of 10 patients had early-onset diarrhea, which resolved within 24 hours. No grade 4-5 diarrheal toxicities were reported.

Other grade 3-4 adverse events observed were electrolyte abnormalities, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and dehydration.

Phase 2 studies are currently ongoing in order to better characterize the activity of combination T-DM1 and neratinib.

The study was funded by PUMA Biotechnology and the University of Pittsburgh. The authors reported financial affiliations with AstraZeneca, Eisai, Genentech, Guardant Health, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and several others.

SOURCE: Abraham J et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00858.

The combination of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and neratinib shows promise in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, according to results from a phase 1b trial.

“The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination in patients previously treated with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab,” wrote Jame Abraham, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The open-label, dose-escalation study included 27 women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had hormone receptor–positive or hormone receptor–negative disease. All participants had demonstrated disease progression, despite prior treatment with combination pertuzumab and trastuzumab, plus a taxane. Among 19 response-evaluable patients, 12 patients (63%) had an objective response. Responses were observed across all neratinib doses, including a complete response in three patients, and partial response in nine patients.

“Deep and more durable responses occurred in patients with cell-free DNA ERBB2 amplification,” Dr. Abraham and associates noted.

“Alterations in the expression of specific HER2 species in ERBB2-amplified cancers, including p95HER2, may have therapeutic implications and require further investigation,” they wrote.

With respect to neratinib dosing, the initial cohort was started at 120 mg daily, which was increased to 240 mg daily in successive cohorts using a 3+3 design. T-DM1 was administered every 3 weeks at 3.6 mg/kg.

After analysis, the researchers proposed a phase 2 dose of neratinib 160 mg once daily and T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg for the combination.

Dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea was reported in a total of six patients, which was most pronounced in cycle 1. At the phase 2 recommended dose of neratinib, 7 of 10 patients had early-onset diarrhea, which resolved within 24 hours. No grade 4-5 diarrheal toxicities were reported.

Other grade 3-4 adverse events observed were electrolyte abnormalities, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and dehydration.

Phase 2 studies are currently ongoing in order to better characterize the activity of combination T-DM1 and neratinib.

The study was funded by PUMA Biotechnology and the University of Pittsburgh. The authors reported financial affiliations with AstraZeneca, Eisai, Genentech, Guardant Health, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and several others.

SOURCE: Abraham J et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00858.

The combination of ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and neratinib shows promise in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, according to results from a phase 1b trial.

“The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of the combination in patients previously treated with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab,” wrote Jame Abraham, MD, of the Cleveland Clinic and colleagues in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The open-label, dose-escalation study included 27 women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had hormone receptor–positive or hormone receptor–negative disease. All participants had demonstrated disease progression, despite prior treatment with combination pertuzumab and trastuzumab, plus a taxane. Among 19 response-evaluable patients, 12 patients (63%) had an objective response. Responses were observed across all neratinib doses, including a complete response in three patients, and partial response in nine patients.

“Deep and more durable responses occurred in patients with cell-free DNA ERBB2 amplification,” Dr. Abraham and associates noted.

“Alterations in the expression of specific HER2 species in ERBB2-amplified cancers, including p95HER2, may have therapeutic implications and require further investigation,” they wrote.

With respect to neratinib dosing, the initial cohort was started at 120 mg daily, which was increased to 240 mg daily in successive cohorts using a 3+3 design. T-DM1 was administered every 3 weeks at 3.6 mg/kg.

After analysis, the researchers proposed a phase 2 dose of neratinib 160 mg once daily and T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg for the combination.

Dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea was reported in a total of six patients, which was most pronounced in cycle 1. At the phase 2 recommended dose of neratinib, 7 of 10 patients had early-onset diarrhea, which resolved within 24 hours. No grade 4-5 diarrheal toxicities were reported.

Other grade 3-4 adverse events observed were electrolyte abnormalities, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and dehydration.

Phase 2 studies are currently ongoing in order to better characterize the activity of combination T-DM1 and neratinib.

The study was funded by PUMA Biotechnology and the University of Pittsburgh. The authors reported financial affiliations with AstraZeneca, Eisai, Genentech, Guardant Health, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and several others.

SOURCE: Abraham J et al. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00858.

Ob.Gyn. News welcomes Iris Krishna, MD, MPH, to the editorial advisory board.

Dr. Krishna is an assistant professor of gynecology and obstetrics in the division of maternal-fetal medicine at Emory University in Atlanta.

She has published articles on topics such as low fetal fraction in noninvasive prenatal screening, breast cancer in pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, obesity, diabetes, and chronic hypertension. She is currently involved in research on chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

Dr. Krishna serves on numerous committees at Emory for the department of gynecology and obstetrics, including the resident clinical competency committee and program evaluation committee, as well as similar committees for the maternal-fetal medicine fellowship program. She also is a member of the Emory University Hospital Midtown’s quality enhancement committee, ethics committee, and critical care committee.

Dr. Krishna received a Master of Public Health in epidemiology from Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine in New Orleans, and a medical degree from Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport. She completed her residency training in obstetrics and gynecology and fellowship training in maternal-fetal medicine at Emory, where she received awards for her clinical skills in obstetrics and completed a thesis research project on prenatal genetic screening. She also was recognized by her staff and colleagues as Outstanding Emory Faculty for her contributions to teaching and clinical service. Dr. Krishna is board certified in obstetrics and gynecology and in maternal-fetal medicine. She is a member of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and a fellow of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

[email protected]

Ob.Gyn. News welcomes Iris Krishna, MD, MPH, to the editorial advisory board.

Dr. Krishna is an assistant professor of gynecology and obstetrics in the division of maternal-fetal medicine at Emory University in Atlanta.

She has published articles on topics such as low fetal fraction in noninvasive prenatal screening, breast cancer in pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, obesity, diabetes, and chronic hypertension. She is currently involved in research on chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

Dr. Krishna serves on numerous committees at Emory for the department of gynecology and obstetrics, including the resident clinical competency committee and program evaluation committee, as well as similar committees for the maternal-fetal medicine fellowship program. She also is a member of the Emory University Hospital Midtown’s quality enhancement committee, ethics committee, and critical care committee.

Dr. Krishna received a Master of Public Health in epidemiology from Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine in New Orleans, and a medical degree from Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport. She completed her residency training in obstetrics and gynecology and fellowship training in maternal-fetal medicine at Emory, where she received awards for her clinical skills in obstetrics and completed a thesis research project on prenatal genetic screening. She also was recognized by her staff and colleagues as Outstanding Emory Faculty for her contributions to teaching and clinical service. Dr. Krishna is board certified in obstetrics and gynecology and in maternal-fetal medicine. She is a member of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and a fellow of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

[email protected]

Ob.Gyn. News welcomes Iris Krishna, MD, MPH, to the editorial advisory board.

Dr. Krishna is an assistant professor of gynecology and obstetrics in the division of maternal-fetal medicine at Emory University in Atlanta.

She has published articles on topics such as low fetal fraction in noninvasive prenatal screening, breast cancer in pregnancy, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, obesity, diabetes, and chronic hypertension. She is currently involved in research on chronic hypertension during pregnancy.

Dr. Krishna serves on numerous committees at Emory for the department of gynecology and obstetrics, including the resident clinical competency committee and program evaluation committee, as well as similar committees for the maternal-fetal medicine fellowship program. She also is a member of the Emory University Hospital Midtown’s quality enhancement committee, ethics committee, and critical care committee.

Dr. Krishna received a Master of Public Health in epidemiology from Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine in New Orleans, and a medical degree from Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport. She completed her residency training in obstetrics and gynecology and fellowship training in maternal-fetal medicine at Emory, where she received awards for her clinical skills in obstetrics and completed a thesis research project on prenatal genetic screening. She also was recognized by her staff and colleagues as Outstanding Emory Faculty for her contributions to teaching and clinical service. Dr. Krishna is board certified in obstetrics and gynecology and in maternal-fetal medicine. She is a member of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and a fellow of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

[email protected]

Do parents pass along posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to their children? Researchers from Universidade do Porto in Portugal, say although it seems a reasonable possibility, the “degree of controversy is high,” and studies have had conflicting results. For instance, some research has found that children of war veterans with PTSD have higher depression scores and higher rates of aggression and anxiety. While other research has shown no differences between veterans’ and nonveterans’ children.

The Universidade do Porto study involved 46 veterans of Portugal’s war with Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea from 1961 to 1974. The researchers studied the association of war veterans’ PTSD lifetime diagnosis and war exposure intensity with the self-reported psychopathology of their adult offspring, assessed 40 years after the end of the war. They also studied childhood adversities and attachment patterns, which have been implicated in intergenerational transmission of trauma and PTSD.

Both veterans and offspring were assessed via questionnaires, clinical interviews, and symptom scales, including the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The veterans also answered the War Experiences Questionnaire. Offspring of fathers with PTSD were not different from offspring of fathers without PTSD, with respect to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and marital status.

The researchers found no association between the veterans’ lifetime PTSD and their children’s psychopathology, attachment dimensions, and self-reported overall childhood maltreatment. The fathers’ war experience carried more weight. It seemed, the researchers say, that the children were able to overcome living with a parent’s PTSD symptoms, but they were less resilient when it came to their fathers’ war experience.

Veterans’ war exposure was associated with BSI in the offspring with regard to somatization, phobic anxiety, Global Severity Index, and Positive Symptom Distress Index. It was also associated with offspring’s physical neglect as a childhood adversity.

These findings could have considerable social importance, the researchers say. They suggest that mental health support could benefit the children especially if provided early after highly traumatized veterans return from war, “not just later on—if and when they develop PTSD.”

Do parents pass along posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to their children? Researchers from Universidade do Porto in Portugal, say although it seems a reasonable possibility, the “degree of controversy is high,” and studies have had conflicting results. For instance, some research has found that children of war veterans with PTSD have higher depression scores and higher rates of aggression and anxiety. While other research has shown no differences between veterans’ and nonveterans’ children.

The Universidade do Porto study involved 46 veterans of Portugal’s war with Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea from 1961 to 1974. The researchers studied the association of war veterans’ PTSD lifetime diagnosis and war exposure intensity with the self-reported psychopathology of their adult offspring, assessed 40 years after the end of the war. They also studied childhood adversities and attachment patterns, which have been implicated in intergenerational transmission of trauma and PTSD.

Both veterans and offspring were assessed via questionnaires, clinical interviews, and symptom scales, including the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The veterans also answered the War Experiences Questionnaire. Offspring of fathers with PTSD were not different from offspring of fathers without PTSD, with respect to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and marital status.

The researchers found no association between the veterans’ lifetime PTSD and their children’s psychopathology, attachment dimensions, and self-reported overall childhood maltreatment. The fathers’ war experience carried more weight. It seemed, the researchers say, that the children were able to overcome living with a parent’s PTSD symptoms, but they were less resilient when it came to their fathers’ war experience.

Veterans’ war exposure was associated with BSI in the offspring with regard to somatization, phobic anxiety, Global Severity Index, and Positive Symptom Distress Index. It was also associated with offspring’s physical neglect as a childhood adversity.

These findings could have considerable social importance, the researchers say. They suggest that mental health support could benefit the children especially if provided early after highly traumatized veterans return from war, “not just later on—if and when they develop PTSD.”

Do parents pass along posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to their children? Researchers from Universidade do Porto in Portugal, say although it seems a reasonable possibility, the “degree of controversy is high,” and studies have had conflicting results. For instance, some research has found that children of war veterans with PTSD have higher depression scores and higher rates of aggression and anxiety. While other research has shown no differences between veterans’ and nonveterans’ children.

The Universidade do Porto study involved 46 veterans of Portugal’s war with Angola, Mozambique, and Guinea from 1961 to 1974. The researchers studied the association of war veterans’ PTSD lifetime diagnosis and war exposure intensity with the self-reported psychopathology of their adult offspring, assessed 40 years after the end of the war. They also studied childhood adversities and attachment patterns, which have been implicated in intergenerational transmission of trauma and PTSD.

Both veterans and offspring were assessed via questionnaires, clinical interviews, and symptom scales, including the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The veterans also answered the War Experiences Questionnaire. Offspring of fathers with PTSD were not different from offspring of fathers without PTSD, with respect to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and marital status.

The researchers found no association between the veterans’ lifetime PTSD and their children’s psychopathology, attachment dimensions, and self-reported overall childhood maltreatment. The fathers’ war experience carried more weight. It seemed, the researchers say, that the children were able to overcome living with a parent’s PTSD symptoms, but they were less resilient when it came to their fathers’ war experience.

Veterans’ war exposure was associated with BSI in the offspring with regard to somatization, phobic anxiety, Global Severity Index, and Positive Symptom Distress Index. It was also associated with offspring’s physical neglect as a childhood adversity.

These findings could have considerable social importance, the researchers say. They suggest that mental health support could benefit the children especially if provided early after highly traumatized veterans return from war, “not just later on—if and when they develop PTSD.”

The treating physicians believed that the patient had developed erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), based on the tender nodules that are characteristic of this treatment reaction. The CDC was again consulted and representatives there agreed.

ENL is a known as a Type 2 reaction to the treatment for leprosy. Management involves the use of oral prednisone, which may be needed for a prolonged time. The antibiotics used to treat leprosy should not be stopped, as ENL is not an allergic reaction. It is due to the destruction of bacilli and the immune response to the release of bacterial antigens.

The patient was transferred to a leprosy hospital in Baton Rouge, Louisiana for further management. The prednisone was not sufficient, and he required further treatment with thalidomide. After 2 years of treatment, he appeared to be free of leprosy and no longer had the ENL.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Mayeaux, EJ, Diaz L, Paulis R. Erythema nodosum. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019:1169-1173.

To learn more about the newest 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine, see: https://www.amazon.com/Color-Atlas-Synopsis-Family-Medicine/dp/1259862046/

You can get the third edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: https://usatinemedia.com/app/color-atlas-of-family-medicine/

The treating physicians believed that the patient had developed erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), based on the tender nodules that are characteristic of this treatment reaction. The CDC was again consulted and representatives there agreed.

ENL is a known as a Type 2 reaction to the treatment for leprosy. Management involves the use of oral prednisone, which may be needed for a prolonged time. The antibiotics used to treat leprosy should not be stopped, as ENL is not an allergic reaction. It is due to the destruction of bacilli and the immune response to the release of bacterial antigens.

The patient was transferred to a leprosy hospital in Baton Rouge, Louisiana for further management. The prednisone was not sufficient, and he required further treatment with thalidomide. After 2 years of treatment, he appeared to be free of leprosy and no longer had the ENL.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Mayeaux, EJ, Diaz L, Paulis R. Erythema nodosum. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019:1169-1173.

To learn more about the newest 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine, see: https://www.amazon.com/Color-Atlas-Synopsis-Family-Medicine/dp/1259862046/

You can get the third edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: https://usatinemedia.com/app/color-atlas-of-family-medicine/

The treating physicians believed that the patient had developed erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL), based on the tender nodules that are characteristic of this treatment reaction. The CDC was again consulted and representatives there agreed.

ENL is a known as a Type 2 reaction to the treatment for leprosy. Management involves the use of oral prednisone, which may be needed for a prolonged time. The antibiotics used to treat leprosy should not be stopped, as ENL is not an allergic reaction. It is due to the destruction of bacilli and the immune response to the release of bacterial antigens.

The patient was transferred to a leprosy hospital in Baton Rouge, Louisiana for further management. The prednisone was not sufficient, and he required further treatment with thalidomide. After 2 years of treatment, he appeared to be free of leprosy and no longer had the ENL.

‌

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Mayeaux, EJ, Diaz L, Paulis R. Erythema nodosum. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al, eds. Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019:1169-1173.

To learn more about the newest 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine, see: https://www.amazon.com/Color-Atlas-Synopsis-Family-Medicine/dp/1259862046/

You can get the third edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: https://usatinemedia.com/app/color-atlas-of-family-medicine/

At age 1, a girl developed a blistery rash on the left side of her face. It was soon followed by a low-grade fever and modest malaise. All symptoms cleared within 2 weeks. Now, at age 4, she continues to experience similar, periodic outbreaks in the same location.

She has already been seen by various providers, including a dermatologist, and received several different diagnoses. The dermatologist scraped the rash and determined it to be a fungal infection. However, the recommended topical antifungal cream had no effect. At least 3 other providers (all nondermatology) called it cellulitis and treated with oral antibiotics, but these attempts also failed.

EXAMINATION
There are no active lesions at the time of this initial examination and no palpable adenopathy in the region. There is a large area of erythema in a macular pattern over the right cheek. No scarring is visible.

The patient later returns when a new outbreak occurs. This time, there are distinct blisters and reactive adenopathy in the adjacent nodal areas.

What’s the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
Results of a viral culture indicate herpes simplex.

The recurrence of persistent, vesicular rashes in the same location signifies a herpetic nature. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is easier to diagnose in an adult patient, due to the ability to elicit a reliable history of premonitory symptoms. Small children have difficulty verbalizing the distinction between a tingle, an itch, and mild pain, which herald the onset of an HSV outbreak.

An episode of HSV can be triggered by anything that raises the body temperature (eg, stress, sickness, or sun exposure). Also important to note, these kinds of outbreaks can occur almost anywhere on the body, including ears, fingers, nipples, noses, and eyelids.

In my experience, most patients with longstanding herpes outbreaks are atopic (ie, allergy prone) or come from families in which atopy is common. Atopic patients are well known to be susceptible to all manner of skin infections, but most especially to herpes. It’s as if their immune systems overreact to pollen, mold, dust, and other allergens, while viral, fungal, and bacterial antigens fly under their immune radar.

In this case, the child was treated with valacyclovir on a chronic, as opposed to episodic, basis. With a bit of luck, this treatment will help to diminish HSV attacks as she matures.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Anything that raises body temperature (sun, colds, or even stress) can trigger an episode of herpes simplex virus (HSV).
• Vesicular rashes that recur in the same location should be presumed herpetic, until proven otherwise. Usually, viral cultures aren’t necessary since the differential is so narrow.
• Atopy can predispose one to all manner of skin infections, including viral, fungal, and bacterial.
• Treatment of chronic HSV can be episodic or preventive, depending on the frequency and severity of attacks.

At age 1, a girl developed a blistery rash on the left side of her face. It was soon followed by a low-grade fever and modest malaise. All symptoms cleared within 2 weeks. Now, at age 4, she continues to experience similar, periodic outbreaks in the same location.

She has already been seen by various providers, including a dermatologist, and received several different diagnoses. The dermatologist scraped the rash and determined it to be a fungal infection. However, the recommended topical antifungal cream had no effect. At least 3 other providers (all nondermatology) called it cellulitis and treated with oral antibiotics, but these attempts also failed.

EXAMINATION
There are no active lesions at the time of this initial examination and no palpable adenopathy in the region. There is a large area of erythema in a macular pattern over the right cheek. No scarring is visible.

The patient later returns when a new outbreak occurs. This time, there are distinct blisters and reactive adenopathy in the adjacent nodal areas.

What’s the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
Results of a viral culture indicate herpes simplex.

The recurrence of persistent, vesicular rashes in the same location signifies a herpetic nature. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is easier to diagnose in an adult patient, due to the ability to elicit a reliable history of premonitory symptoms. Small children have difficulty verbalizing the distinction between a tingle, an itch, and mild pain, which herald the onset of an HSV outbreak.

An episode of HSV can be triggered by anything that raises the body temperature (eg, stress, sickness, or sun exposure). Also important to note, these kinds of outbreaks can occur almost anywhere on the body, including ears, fingers, nipples, noses, and eyelids.

In my experience, most patients with longstanding herpes outbreaks are atopic (ie, allergy prone) or come from families in which atopy is common. Atopic patients are well known to be susceptible to all manner of skin infections, but most especially to herpes. It’s as if their immune systems overreact to pollen, mold, dust, and other allergens, while viral, fungal, and bacterial antigens fly under their immune radar.

In this case, the child was treated with valacyclovir on a chronic, as opposed to episodic, basis. With a bit of luck, this treatment will help to diminish HSV attacks as she matures.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Anything that raises body temperature (sun, colds, or even stress) can trigger an episode of herpes simplex virus (HSV).
• Vesicular rashes that recur in the same location should be presumed herpetic, until proven otherwise. Usually, viral cultures aren’t necessary since the differential is so narrow.
• Atopy can predispose one to all manner of skin infections, including viral, fungal, and bacterial.
• Treatment of chronic HSV can be episodic or preventive, depending on the frequency and severity of attacks.

At age 1, a girl developed a blistery rash on the left side of her face. It was soon followed by a low-grade fever and modest malaise. All symptoms cleared within 2 weeks. Now, at age 4, she continues to experience similar, periodic outbreaks in the same location.

She has already been seen by various providers, including a dermatologist, and received several different diagnoses. The dermatologist scraped the rash and determined it to be a fungal infection. However, the recommended topical antifungal cream had no effect. At least 3 other providers (all nondermatology) called it cellulitis and treated with oral antibiotics, but these attempts also failed.

EXAMINATION
There are no active lesions at the time of this initial examination and no palpable adenopathy in the region. There is a large area of erythema in a macular pattern over the right cheek. No scarring is visible.

The patient later returns when a new outbreak occurs. This time, there are distinct blisters and reactive adenopathy in the adjacent nodal areas.

What’s the diagnosis?

DISCUSSION
Results of a viral culture indicate herpes simplex.

The recurrence of persistent, vesicular rashes in the same location signifies a herpetic nature. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is easier to diagnose in an adult patient, due to the ability to elicit a reliable history of premonitory symptoms. Small children have difficulty verbalizing the distinction between a tingle, an itch, and mild pain, which herald the onset of an HSV outbreak.

An episode of HSV can be triggered by anything that raises the body temperature (eg, stress, sickness, or sun exposure). Also important to note, these kinds of outbreaks can occur almost anywhere on the body, including ears, fingers, nipples, noses, and eyelids.

In my experience, most patients with longstanding herpes outbreaks are atopic (ie, allergy prone) or come from families in which atopy is common. Atopic patients are well known to be susceptible to all manner of skin infections, but most especially to herpes. It’s as if their immune systems overreact to pollen, mold, dust, and other allergens, while viral, fungal, and bacterial antigens fly under their immune radar.

In this case, the child was treated with valacyclovir on a chronic, as opposed to episodic, basis. With a bit of luck, this treatment will help to diminish HSV attacks as she matures.

TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS

• Anything that raises body temperature (sun, colds, or even stress) can trigger an episode of herpes simplex virus (HSV).
• Vesicular rashes that recur in the same location should be presumed herpetic, until proven otherwise. Usually, viral cultures aren’t necessary since the differential is so narrow.
• Atopy can predispose one to all manner of skin infections, including viral, fungal, and bacterial.
• Treatment of chronic HSV can be episodic or preventive, depending on the frequency and severity of attacks.

While meningococcal group B (MenB) vaccination remains suboptimal in the United States, completion was significantly higher for the MenB-4C (Bexsero) vaccine, compared with the other vaccine option, MenB-FHbp (Trumenba), according to Elizabeth Packnett of IBM Watson Health in Bethesda, Md., and associates.

Steve Mann/Thinkstock

In a study published in Vaccine, the investigators retrospectively analyzed 65,205 (36,118 received MenB-4C; 29,087 received MenB-FHbp) commercially insured individuals from the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database during Jan. 1, 2015–Feb. 28, 2018, as well as 13,535 (10,153 received MenB-4C; 3,382 received MenB-FHbp) Medicaid-covered individuals from the Medicaid Multi-State Database during Jan. 1, 2015–Dec. 31, 2017.

The rate of vaccine completion in the MarketScan database within 15 months of initiation was 63% for MenB-4C and 52% for MenB-FHbp, and dosing schedule adherence was 62% for MenB-4C and 18% for MenB-FHbp. The median time to completion among those who finished vaccination was 68 days for MenB-4C versus 258 days for MenB-FHbp.

In the Medicaid database, the rate of vaccine completion within 15 months of initiation was 49% for MenB-4C and 31% for MenB-FHbp; dosing schedule adherence was 48% and 8%, respectively. Median time to vaccine completion was 88 days for MenB-4C versus 309 days for MenB-FHbp.

“The observations of improved completion and schedule adherence rates for MenB-4C, compared with MenB-FHbp, were consistent across both the commercial and Medicaid populations, and persisted after adjusting for individual factors in multivariable analyses, suggesting that the results were not skewed by population differences in demographic or other characteristics,” the investigators noted, adding that the significant difference in completion and schedule adherence between vaccines likely reflects the MenB-4C flexible dosing schedule.

The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of MenB-4C, and four coauthors reported being employed by the company. Five coauthors were employed by IBM Watson Health, which conducted the study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Packnett E et al. Vaccine. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.065.

While meningococcal group B (MenB) vaccination remains suboptimal in the United States, completion was significantly higher for the MenB-4C (Bexsero) vaccine, compared with the other vaccine option, MenB-FHbp (Trumenba), according to Elizabeth Packnett of IBM Watson Health in Bethesda, Md., and associates.

Steve Mann/Thinkstock

In a study published in Vaccine, the investigators retrospectively analyzed 65,205 (36,118 received MenB-4C; 29,087 received MenB-FHbp) commercially insured individuals from the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database during Jan. 1, 2015–Feb. 28, 2018, as well as 13,535 (10,153 received MenB-4C; 3,382 received MenB-FHbp) Medicaid-covered individuals from the Medicaid Multi-State Database during Jan. 1, 2015–Dec. 31, 2017.

The rate of vaccine completion in the MarketScan database within 15 months of initiation was 63% for MenB-4C and 52% for MenB-FHbp, and dosing schedule adherence was 62% for MenB-4C and 18% for MenB-FHbp. The median time to completion among those who finished vaccination was 68 days for MenB-4C versus 258 days for MenB-FHbp.

In the Medicaid database, the rate of vaccine completion within 15 months of initiation was 49% for MenB-4C and 31% for MenB-FHbp; dosing schedule adherence was 48% and 8%, respectively. Median time to vaccine completion was 88 days for MenB-4C versus 309 days for MenB-FHbp.

“The observations of improved completion and schedule adherence rates for MenB-4C, compared with MenB-FHbp, were consistent across both the commercial and Medicaid populations, and persisted after adjusting for individual factors in multivariable analyses, suggesting that the results were not skewed by population differences in demographic or other characteristics,” the investigators noted, adding that the significant difference in completion and schedule adherence between vaccines likely reflects the MenB-4C flexible dosing schedule.

The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of MenB-4C, and four coauthors reported being employed by the company. Five coauthors were employed by IBM Watson Health, which conducted the study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Packnett E et al. Vaccine. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.065.

While meningococcal group B (MenB) vaccination remains suboptimal in the United States, completion was significantly higher for the MenB-4C (Bexsero) vaccine, compared with the other vaccine option, MenB-FHbp (Trumenba), according to Elizabeth Packnett of IBM Watson Health in Bethesda, Md., and associates.

Steve Mann/Thinkstock

In a study published in Vaccine, the investigators retrospectively analyzed 65,205 (36,118 received MenB-4C; 29,087 received MenB-FHbp) commercially insured individuals from the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database during Jan. 1, 2015–Feb. 28, 2018, as well as 13,535 (10,153 received MenB-4C; 3,382 received MenB-FHbp) Medicaid-covered individuals from the Medicaid Multi-State Database during Jan. 1, 2015–Dec. 31, 2017.

The rate of vaccine completion in the MarketScan database within 15 months of initiation was 63% for MenB-4C and 52% for MenB-FHbp, and dosing schedule adherence was 62% for MenB-4C and 18% for MenB-FHbp. The median time to completion among those who finished vaccination was 68 days for MenB-4C versus 258 days for MenB-FHbp.

In the Medicaid database, the rate of vaccine completion within 15 months of initiation was 49% for MenB-4C and 31% for MenB-FHbp; dosing schedule adherence was 48% and 8%, respectively. Median time to vaccine completion was 88 days for MenB-4C versus 309 days for MenB-FHbp.

“The observations of improved completion and schedule adherence rates for MenB-4C, compared with MenB-FHbp, were consistent across both the commercial and Medicaid populations, and persisted after adjusting for individual factors in multivariable analyses, suggesting that the results were not skewed by population differences in demographic or other characteristics,” the investigators noted, adding that the significant difference in completion and schedule adherence between vaccines likely reflects the MenB-4C flexible dosing schedule.

The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of MenB-4C, and four coauthors reported being employed by the company. Five coauthors were employed by IBM Watson Health, which conducted the study.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Packnett E et al. Vaccine. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.065.

The Food and Drug Administration on Aug. 27 approved Nourianz (istradefylline) tablets as an add-on treatment to levodopa/carbidopa in adult patients with Parkinson’s disease experiencing off episodes. During off episodes, patients’ medications do not work well, and symptoms such as tremor and difficulty walking increase.

bankrx/Getty Images

The effectiveness of Nourianz for this indication was shown in four 12-week placebo-controlled clinical studies that included 1,143 participants. In all four studies, patients treated with Nourianz experienced a statistically significant decrease from baseline in daily off time, compared with patients who received placebo.

The most common adverse reactions to istradefylline with an incidence of 5% or greater and occurring more frequently than with placebo were dyskinesia (15%, 17%, and 8%, for Nourianz 20 mg, 40 mg, and placebo, respectively), dizziness (3%, 6%, and 4%), constipation (5%, 6%, and 3%), nausea (4%, 6%, and 5%), hallucination (2%, 6%, and 3%), and insomnia (1%, 6%, and 4%). In clinical trials, 1% of patients treated with Nourianz 20 mg or 40 mg discontinued treatment because of dyskinesia, compared with no patients who received placebo.

In addition,one patient treated with Nourianz 40 mg experienced impulse control disorder, compared with no patients who received Nourianz 20 mg or placebo.

If hallucinations, psychotic behavior, or impulsive or compulsive behavior occurs, a dosage reduction or stoppage should be considered, according to the FDA. Use of Nourianz during pregnancy is not recommended, and women of childbearing potential should be advised to use contraception during treatment.

The maximum recommended dosage in patients taking strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is 20 mg once daily, and clinicians should avoid use of Nourianz with strong CYP3A4 inducers.

Istradefylline is the first adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist for use in Parkinson’s disease in the United States, and the drug provides patients with a novel nondopaminergic daily oral treatment option, according to a news release from Kyowa Kirin, the company that markets the drug.

Since 2013, istradefylline has been marketed at Nouriast in Japan, where it is indicated for the wearing-off phenomenon in patients with Parkinson’s disease who take preparations containing levodopa.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration on Aug. 27 approved Nourianz (istradefylline) tablets as an add-on treatment to levodopa/carbidopa in adult patients with Parkinson’s disease experiencing off episodes. During off episodes, patients’ medications do not work well, and symptoms such as tremor and difficulty walking increase.

bankrx/Getty Images

The effectiveness of Nourianz for this indication was shown in four 12-week placebo-controlled clinical studies that included 1,143 participants. In all four studies, patients treated with Nourianz experienced a statistically significant decrease from baseline in daily off time, compared with patients who received placebo.

The most common adverse reactions to istradefylline with an incidence of 5% or greater and occurring more frequently than with placebo were dyskinesia (15%, 17%, and 8%, for Nourianz 20 mg, 40 mg, and placebo, respectively), dizziness (3%, 6%, and 4%), constipation (5%, 6%, and 3%), nausea (4%, 6%, and 5%), hallucination (2%, 6%, and 3%), and insomnia (1%, 6%, and 4%). In clinical trials, 1% of patients treated with Nourianz 20 mg or 40 mg discontinued treatment because of dyskinesia, compared with no patients who received placebo.

In addition,one patient treated with Nourianz 40 mg experienced impulse control disorder, compared with no patients who received Nourianz 20 mg or placebo.

If hallucinations, psychotic behavior, or impulsive or compulsive behavior occurs, a dosage reduction or stoppage should be considered, according to the FDA. Use of Nourianz during pregnancy is not recommended, and women of childbearing potential should be advised to use contraception during treatment.

The maximum recommended dosage in patients taking strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is 20 mg once daily, and clinicians should avoid use of Nourianz with strong CYP3A4 inducers.

Istradefylline is the first adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist for use in Parkinson’s disease in the United States, and the drug provides patients with a novel nondopaminergic daily oral treatment option, according to a news release from Kyowa Kirin, the company that markets the drug.

Since 2013, istradefylline has been marketed at Nouriast in Japan, where it is indicated for the wearing-off phenomenon in patients with Parkinson’s disease who take preparations containing levodopa.

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration on Aug. 27 approved Nourianz (istradefylline) tablets as an add-on treatment to levodopa/carbidopa in adult patients with Parkinson’s disease experiencing off episodes. During off episodes, patients’ medications do not work well, and symptoms such as tremor and difficulty walking increase.

bankrx/Getty Images

The effectiveness of Nourianz for this indication was shown in four 12-week placebo-controlled clinical studies that included 1,143 participants. In all four studies, patients treated with Nourianz experienced a statistically significant decrease from baseline in daily off time, compared with patients who received placebo.

The most common adverse reactions to istradefylline with an incidence of 5% or greater and occurring more frequently than with placebo were dyskinesia (15%, 17%, and 8%, for Nourianz 20 mg, 40 mg, and placebo, respectively), dizziness (3%, 6%, and 4%), constipation (5%, 6%, and 3%), nausea (4%, 6%, and 5%), hallucination (2%, 6%, and 3%), and insomnia (1%, 6%, and 4%). In clinical trials, 1% of patients treated with Nourianz 20 mg or 40 mg discontinued treatment because of dyskinesia, compared with no patients who received placebo.

In addition,one patient treated with Nourianz 40 mg experienced impulse control disorder, compared with no patients who received Nourianz 20 mg or placebo.

If hallucinations, psychotic behavior, or impulsive or compulsive behavior occurs, a dosage reduction or stoppage should be considered, according to the FDA. Use of Nourianz during pregnancy is not recommended, and women of childbearing potential should be advised to use contraception during treatment.

The maximum recommended dosage in patients taking strong CYP3A4 inhibitors is 20 mg once daily, and clinicians should avoid use of Nourianz with strong CYP3A4 inducers.

Istradefylline is the first adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist for use in Parkinson’s disease in the United States, and the drug provides patients with a novel nondopaminergic daily oral treatment option, according to a news release from Kyowa Kirin, the company that markets the drug.

Since 2013, istradefylline has been marketed at Nouriast in Japan, where it is indicated for the wearing-off phenomenon in patients with Parkinson’s disease who take preparations containing levodopa.

[email protected]