User login
VIDEO: Acromegaly study reveals gender-specific differences
BOSTON – , according to study results presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
The study was based on data for 112 patients (54 male, 58 female) operated on by one neurosurgeon between 1994 and 2016. The mean age at surgery was 43.6 years in men and 48.7 in women (P = .04), according to Talin Handa, Emory University, Atlanta, who presented the retrospective analysis.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Men had higher mean IGF-1 levels (874 ng/mL vs. 716 ng/mL for women; P less than .01), and were more likely to have hypopituitarism.
Adjuvant treatment for acromegaly was needed in 57% of men and 49% of women. Following adjuvant treatment, 72% of men maintained surgical remission or achieved normal IGF-1 levels, compared with 89% of women (P = .03). Mean follow-up was shorter in men, 3.6 years, versus 5.2 years for women (P = .02), the researchers reported.
Six-year event-free survival was higher in women (P less than .01), according to the researchers.
For more study findings, watch our video interview.
SOURCE: Handa T et al. AACE 2018. Abstract #824.
BOSTON – , according to study results presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
The study was based on data for 112 patients (54 male, 58 female) operated on by one neurosurgeon between 1994 and 2016. The mean age at surgery was 43.6 years in men and 48.7 in women (P = .04), according to Talin Handa, Emory University, Atlanta, who presented the retrospective analysis.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Men had higher mean IGF-1 levels (874 ng/mL vs. 716 ng/mL for women; P less than .01), and were more likely to have hypopituitarism.
Adjuvant treatment for acromegaly was needed in 57% of men and 49% of women. Following adjuvant treatment, 72% of men maintained surgical remission or achieved normal IGF-1 levels, compared with 89% of women (P = .03). Mean follow-up was shorter in men, 3.6 years, versus 5.2 years for women (P = .02), the researchers reported.
Six-year event-free survival was higher in women (P less than .01), according to the researchers.
For more study findings, watch our video interview.
SOURCE: Handa T et al. AACE 2018. Abstract #824.
BOSTON – , according to study results presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
The study was based on data for 112 patients (54 male, 58 female) operated on by one neurosurgeon between 1994 and 2016. The mean age at surgery was 43.6 years in men and 48.7 in women (P = .04), according to Talin Handa, Emory University, Atlanta, who presented the retrospective analysis.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
Men had higher mean IGF-1 levels (874 ng/mL vs. 716 ng/mL for women; P less than .01), and were more likely to have hypopituitarism.
Adjuvant treatment for acromegaly was needed in 57% of men and 49% of women. Following adjuvant treatment, 72% of men maintained surgical remission or achieved normal IGF-1 levels, compared with 89% of women (P = .03). Mean follow-up was shorter in men, 3.6 years, versus 5.2 years for women (P = .02), the researchers reported.
Six-year event-free survival was higher in women (P less than .01), according to the researchers.
For more study findings, watch our video interview.
SOURCE: Handa T et al. AACE 2018. Abstract #824.
REPORTING FROM AACE 2018
Key clinical point: Men with acromegaly present at a younger age, have higher IGF-1 levels, and achieve lower biochemical control rates than do women with the disorder.
Major finding: Men were less likely than women to have surgical remissions or normal IGF-1 levels after adjuvant treatment (72% for men and 89% for women; P = .03).
Study details: A retrospective analysis of 112 patients (54 male, 58 female) operated on by one neurosurgeon during 1994-2016.
Disclosures: The presenter had no disclosures related to the presentation.
Source: Handa T et al. AACE 2018. Abstract #824.
VIDEO: Location of thyroid nodules may predict malignancy
BOSTON – according to the results of a retrospective, single-center study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
When nodules were located in the upper pole of the gland, the risk of malignancy was about 4 times higher than it was for nodules at other locations in the gland. Researchers confirmed the association using a multiple logistic regression model with adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, laterality, and number of nodules (odds ratio, 4.6; P = 0.03). The findings are believed to be the first to show an association between location of thyroid nodules on ultrasound and malignancy risk.
The results appear to elevate the value of ultrasound for predicting thyroid malignancy and should affect guidelines for ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules, researcher Fan Zhang, MD, PhD, a fellow at State University of New York, Brooklyn, said in a video interview. “In the future, I would recommend maybe we could consider including the location of thyroid nodules in the guidelines for better predictive value of malignancies,” she said.
Other ultrasound characteristics known to be associated with malignancy include findings of microcalcifications, increased vascularity, and nodules that are taller than they are wide, according to Dr. Zhang.
The retrospective review included data on 219 clinic patients with thyroid nodules who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy between July 2016 and June 2017. Nearly 80% of the nodules in the review were located in the lower pole of the gland, about 10% were in the upper pole, 7% were in the middle pole, and about 2% were found in the isthmus.
Fourteen nodules, or 7.4%, were found to be malignant, Dr. Zhang and her coauthors said in their presentation. Of those 14 malignancies, 7 were among the 149 nodules in the lower pole, 4 were among the 18 in the upper pole, and 3 were among the 21 in the middle pole.
The anatomy of the thyroid gland may be a factor in why upper pole nodules would be more likely to be associated with malignancy, according to Dr. Zhang. “The veins in the upper lobe are more tortuous compared to in the lower lobe,” she said, noting that slow venous drainage may increase the possibility of developing malignancy.
Dr. Zhang had no relevant disclosures to report.
SOURCE: Zhang F et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 1204.
BOSTON – according to the results of a retrospective, single-center study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
When nodules were located in the upper pole of the gland, the risk of malignancy was about 4 times higher than it was for nodules at other locations in the gland. Researchers confirmed the association using a multiple logistic regression model with adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, laterality, and number of nodules (odds ratio, 4.6; P = 0.03). The findings are believed to be the first to show an association between location of thyroid nodules on ultrasound and malignancy risk.
The results appear to elevate the value of ultrasound for predicting thyroid malignancy and should affect guidelines for ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules, researcher Fan Zhang, MD, PhD, a fellow at State University of New York, Brooklyn, said in a video interview. “In the future, I would recommend maybe we could consider including the location of thyroid nodules in the guidelines for better predictive value of malignancies,” she said.
Other ultrasound characteristics known to be associated with malignancy include findings of microcalcifications, increased vascularity, and nodules that are taller than they are wide, according to Dr. Zhang.
The retrospective review included data on 219 clinic patients with thyroid nodules who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy between July 2016 and June 2017. Nearly 80% of the nodules in the review were located in the lower pole of the gland, about 10% were in the upper pole, 7% were in the middle pole, and about 2% were found in the isthmus.
Fourteen nodules, or 7.4%, were found to be malignant, Dr. Zhang and her coauthors said in their presentation. Of those 14 malignancies, 7 were among the 149 nodules in the lower pole, 4 were among the 18 in the upper pole, and 3 were among the 21 in the middle pole.
The anatomy of the thyroid gland may be a factor in why upper pole nodules would be more likely to be associated with malignancy, according to Dr. Zhang. “The veins in the upper lobe are more tortuous compared to in the lower lobe,” she said, noting that slow venous drainage may increase the possibility of developing malignancy.
Dr. Zhang had no relevant disclosures to report.
SOURCE: Zhang F et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 1204.
BOSTON – according to the results of a retrospective, single-center study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
When nodules were located in the upper pole of the gland, the risk of malignancy was about 4 times higher than it was for nodules at other locations in the gland. Researchers confirmed the association using a multiple logistic regression model with adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, laterality, and number of nodules (odds ratio, 4.6; P = 0.03). The findings are believed to be the first to show an association between location of thyroid nodules on ultrasound and malignancy risk.
The results appear to elevate the value of ultrasound for predicting thyroid malignancy and should affect guidelines for ultrasound classification of thyroid nodules, researcher Fan Zhang, MD, PhD, a fellow at State University of New York, Brooklyn, said in a video interview. “In the future, I would recommend maybe we could consider including the location of thyroid nodules in the guidelines for better predictive value of malignancies,” she said.
Other ultrasound characteristics known to be associated with malignancy include findings of microcalcifications, increased vascularity, and nodules that are taller than they are wide, according to Dr. Zhang.
The retrospective review included data on 219 clinic patients with thyroid nodules who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy between July 2016 and June 2017. Nearly 80% of the nodules in the review were located in the lower pole of the gland, about 10% were in the upper pole, 7% were in the middle pole, and about 2% were found in the isthmus.
Fourteen nodules, or 7.4%, were found to be malignant, Dr. Zhang and her coauthors said in their presentation. Of those 14 malignancies, 7 were among the 149 nodules in the lower pole, 4 were among the 18 in the upper pole, and 3 were among the 21 in the middle pole.
The anatomy of the thyroid gland may be a factor in why upper pole nodules would be more likely to be associated with malignancy, according to Dr. Zhang. “The veins in the upper lobe are more tortuous compared to in the lower lobe,” she said, noting that slow venous drainage may increase the possibility of developing malignancy.
Dr. Zhang had no relevant disclosures to report.
SOURCE: Zhang F et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 1204.
REPORTING FROM AACE 2018
Key clinical point: Thyroid nodules located in the upper pole may be considered a risk factor for malignancy.
Major finding: Assessment by location showed that 28.6% of nodules found in the upper pole were malignant, compared with 4.9% in the lower pole, 18.2% in the middle pole, and 14.3% in the isthmus (odds ratio, 5.8; P = 0.01).
Study details: A retrospective review including data on 219 clinic patients with thyroid nodules who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy between July 2016 and June 2017.
Disclosures: Dr. Zhang had no relevant disclosures to report.
Source: Zhang F et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 1204.
Calcium, PTH predict permanent hypoparathyroidism
BOSTON – Low postoperative calcium serum and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels may be strong predictors of permanent hypoparathyroidism in total thyroidectomy patients, according to results of a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
With incidence of transient hypoparathyroidism at 20-30%, being able to predict at-risk patients can significantly help clinicians with postoperative management, according to Steven Brown, DO, of the University of Arizona, Phoenix.
“It’s very important to draw the preoperative lab and postoperative lab in order to help those patients who are at risk,” said Dr. Brown in an oral abstract session.
To test the predictive accuracy of PTH and calcium levels, investigators conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 176 total thyroidectomy patients recorded during 1999-2013.
Patients with hypoparathyroidism had an average age of about 47 years, was almost entirely composed of females, was majority hispanic, and had mean postop calcium and PTH levels of 7.6 mg/dL and 8.0 pg/mL, respectively.
Those without hypoparathyroidism averaged about 51 years old, were equally hispanic and white, and had postop calcium and PTH levels of 8.08 mg/dL and 30.8 pg/dL, respectively.
Patients were split into four groups: Group 1 had low calcium and PTH levels (66), group 2 had low calcium and normal PTH levels (30), group 3 had normal calcium and low PTH levels (31), and group 4 had normal levels of both (49).
Over the study period, hypoparathyroidism developed in 30% of patients in group 1, 10% in group 2, 15% in group 3, and 2% in group 4.
Permanent hypothyroidism was defined as persistently low PTH (less than 12 pg/mL), low serum calcium (less than 8.0 mg/dL), and/or requiring calcitriol to maintain a normal calcium level for more than 6 months after total thyroidectomy.
Those with both low calcium and PTH levels were 4.3 times more likely to develop permanent hypoparathyroidism than those in the other groups, according to Dr. Brown.
Patients in the permanent hypoparathyroid group had a PTH drop of 70%, compared with 39% in the nonhypoparathyroid group. There was also a significant difference in respective drops of calcium levels (17.8% vs. 14.3%).
By comparing the levels before and after a thyroidectomy, physicians can act faster and more accurately when determining how best to treat patients to prevent hypoparathyroidism, a practice which, according to Dr. Brown, has already begun to be put into place.
“We’re starting to incorporate some of the practices into our patient care routine,” said Dr. Brown. “The next part of our project is going to be to actually do a prospective study at three different institution sites in order to evaluate this further.”
Dr. Brown reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Brown S et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 720.
BOSTON – Low postoperative calcium serum and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels may be strong predictors of permanent hypoparathyroidism in total thyroidectomy patients, according to results of a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
With incidence of transient hypoparathyroidism at 20-30%, being able to predict at-risk patients can significantly help clinicians with postoperative management, according to Steven Brown, DO, of the University of Arizona, Phoenix.
“It’s very important to draw the preoperative lab and postoperative lab in order to help those patients who are at risk,” said Dr. Brown in an oral abstract session.
To test the predictive accuracy of PTH and calcium levels, investigators conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 176 total thyroidectomy patients recorded during 1999-2013.
Patients with hypoparathyroidism had an average age of about 47 years, was almost entirely composed of females, was majority hispanic, and had mean postop calcium and PTH levels of 7.6 mg/dL and 8.0 pg/mL, respectively.
Those without hypoparathyroidism averaged about 51 years old, were equally hispanic and white, and had postop calcium and PTH levels of 8.08 mg/dL and 30.8 pg/dL, respectively.
Patients were split into four groups: Group 1 had low calcium and PTH levels (66), group 2 had low calcium and normal PTH levels (30), group 3 had normal calcium and low PTH levels (31), and group 4 had normal levels of both (49).
Over the study period, hypoparathyroidism developed in 30% of patients in group 1, 10% in group 2, 15% in group 3, and 2% in group 4.
Permanent hypothyroidism was defined as persistently low PTH (less than 12 pg/mL), low serum calcium (less than 8.0 mg/dL), and/or requiring calcitriol to maintain a normal calcium level for more than 6 months after total thyroidectomy.
Those with both low calcium and PTH levels were 4.3 times more likely to develop permanent hypoparathyroidism than those in the other groups, according to Dr. Brown.
Patients in the permanent hypoparathyroid group had a PTH drop of 70%, compared with 39% in the nonhypoparathyroid group. There was also a significant difference in respective drops of calcium levels (17.8% vs. 14.3%).
By comparing the levels before and after a thyroidectomy, physicians can act faster and more accurately when determining how best to treat patients to prevent hypoparathyroidism, a practice which, according to Dr. Brown, has already begun to be put into place.
“We’re starting to incorporate some of the practices into our patient care routine,” said Dr. Brown. “The next part of our project is going to be to actually do a prospective study at three different institution sites in order to evaluate this further.”
Dr. Brown reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Brown S et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 720.
BOSTON – Low postoperative calcium serum and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels may be strong predictors of permanent hypoparathyroidism in total thyroidectomy patients, according to results of a study presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.
With incidence of transient hypoparathyroidism at 20-30%, being able to predict at-risk patients can significantly help clinicians with postoperative management, according to Steven Brown, DO, of the University of Arizona, Phoenix.
“It’s very important to draw the preoperative lab and postoperative lab in order to help those patients who are at risk,” said Dr. Brown in an oral abstract session.
To test the predictive accuracy of PTH and calcium levels, investigators conducted a single-center, retrospective study of 176 total thyroidectomy patients recorded during 1999-2013.
Patients with hypoparathyroidism had an average age of about 47 years, was almost entirely composed of females, was majority hispanic, and had mean postop calcium and PTH levels of 7.6 mg/dL and 8.0 pg/mL, respectively.
Those without hypoparathyroidism averaged about 51 years old, were equally hispanic and white, and had postop calcium and PTH levels of 8.08 mg/dL and 30.8 pg/dL, respectively.
Patients were split into four groups: Group 1 had low calcium and PTH levels (66), group 2 had low calcium and normal PTH levels (30), group 3 had normal calcium and low PTH levels (31), and group 4 had normal levels of both (49).
Over the study period, hypoparathyroidism developed in 30% of patients in group 1, 10% in group 2, 15% in group 3, and 2% in group 4.
Permanent hypothyroidism was defined as persistently low PTH (less than 12 pg/mL), low serum calcium (less than 8.0 mg/dL), and/or requiring calcitriol to maintain a normal calcium level for more than 6 months after total thyroidectomy.
Those with both low calcium and PTH levels were 4.3 times more likely to develop permanent hypoparathyroidism than those in the other groups, according to Dr. Brown.
Patients in the permanent hypoparathyroid group had a PTH drop of 70%, compared with 39% in the nonhypoparathyroid group. There was also a significant difference in respective drops of calcium levels (17.8% vs. 14.3%).
By comparing the levels before and after a thyroidectomy, physicians can act faster and more accurately when determining how best to treat patients to prevent hypoparathyroidism, a practice which, according to Dr. Brown, has already begun to be put into place.
“We’re starting to incorporate some of the practices into our patient care routine,” said Dr. Brown. “The next part of our project is going to be to actually do a prospective study at three different institution sites in order to evaluate this further.”
Dr. Brown reported no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Brown S et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 720.
REPORTING FROM AACE 18
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Patients with low calcium and low PTH were 4.3 times as likely as those without to develop permanent hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy.
Study details: Retrospective, single center study of 176 total thyroidectomy patients during 1999-2013.
Disclosures: The presenter reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Brown S et al. AACE 2018, Abstract 720.
AACE 2018: A dream team of presenters
Boston is the location and inspiration for the featured presentations at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, program chair Vin Tangpricha, MD, PhD, said in an interview.
The program agenda for the congress, held May 16-20, boasts 143 speakers, 66 distinct clinical endocrinology educational sessions, and an opening plenary presentation featuring one of modern medicine’s most renowned diabetes and obesity researchers, according to a statement from the AACE.
The meeting’s theme is “Charting the Future,” an ode to Boston’s reputation for seafaring and medical innovation; Dr. Tangpricha, a professor of medicine at Emory University in Atlanta, gave a preview on how each of the following top sessions by endocrinology luminaries will enhance clinical endocrinologists’ practice.
New Dimensions in Insulin Action and Why They Are Important to Know
C. Ronald Kahn, MD, chief academic officer and head of Integrative Physiology and Metabolism at Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston, pioneered revolutionary work with insulin receptors and insulin resistance in diabetes and obesity. What makes his presentation on Thursday from 8:30 a.m. to 9:15 a.m. a must-see is its focus on the future: “Many new drugs are being developed based on the research on how insulin works. This lecture will be exciting to hear what is in the pipeline for drugs that manipulate insulin action,” Dr. Tangpricha said.
Cushing’s Syndrome
Beta-Cell Regeneration
The work of Andrew F. Stewart, MD, scientific director of the Mount Sinai Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute in New York, leads research into the basic mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of metabolic diseases. “In the past, we thought that there was a fixed number of beta cells in the body. However, recent research by Dr. Stewart’s group suggests that beta cells can be stimulated to grow. This is very exciting and can shape the future of how we take care of diabetes,” noted Dr. Tangpricha. The session is on Friday from 8:20 a.m. to 9:05 a.m.
New Insights Into Thyroid Hormone Action
On Thursday from 11:15 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., Anthony N. Hollenberg, MD, will present “an outstanding review on thyroid hormone and action and how this impacts patient care of those with thyroid disease,” Dr. Tangpricha said. Dr. Hollenberg is chief of the thyroid unit and the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.
Current and Evolving Approaches for Osteoporosis Treatment
Sundeep Khosla, MD, an expert on bone loss, will distill the myriad osteoporosis treatments into useful information that can inform your practice now. “There have been a number of drugs that have been released for the treatment of osteoporosis. We are now in an era where we can consider using drugs targeted for specific populations or specific combinations,” Dr. Tangpricha commented. This session is on Saturday at 8:15 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.
Boston is the location and inspiration for the featured presentations at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, program chair Vin Tangpricha, MD, PhD, said in an interview.
The program agenda for the congress, held May 16-20, boasts 143 speakers, 66 distinct clinical endocrinology educational sessions, and an opening plenary presentation featuring one of modern medicine’s most renowned diabetes and obesity researchers, according to a statement from the AACE.
The meeting’s theme is “Charting the Future,” an ode to Boston’s reputation for seafaring and medical innovation; Dr. Tangpricha, a professor of medicine at Emory University in Atlanta, gave a preview on how each of the following top sessions by endocrinology luminaries will enhance clinical endocrinologists’ practice.
New Dimensions in Insulin Action and Why They Are Important to Know
C. Ronald Kahn, MD, chief academic officer and head of Integrative Physiology and Metabolism at Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston, pioneered revolutionary work with insulin receptors and insulin resistance in diabetes and obesity. What makes his presentation on Thursday from 8:30 a.m. to 9:15 a.m. a must-see is its focus on the future: “Many new drugs are being developed based on the research on how insulin works. This lecture will be exciting to hear what is in the pipeline for drugs that manipulate insulin action,” Dr. Tangpricha said.
Cushing’s Syndrome
Beta-Cell Regeneration
The work of Andrew F. Stewart, MD, scientific director of the Mount Sinai Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute in New York, leads research into the basic mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of metabolic diseases. “In the past, we thought that there was a fixed number of beta cells in the body. However, recent research by Dr. Stewart’s group suggests that beta cells can be stimulated to grow. This is very exciting and can shape the future of how we take care of diabetes,” noted Dr. Tangpricha. The session is on Friday from 8:20 a.m. to 9:05 a.m.
New Insights Into Thyroid Hormone Action
On Thursday from 11:15 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., Anthony N. Hollenberg, MD, will present “an outstanding review on thyroid hormone and action and how this impacts patient care of those with thyroid disease,” Dr. Tangpricha said. Dr. Hollenberg is chief of the thyroid unit and the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.
Current and Evolving Approaches for Osteoporosis Treatment
Sundeep Khosla, MD, an expert on bone loss, will distill the myriad osteoporosis treatments into useful information that can inform your practice now. “There have been a number of drugs that have been released for the treatment of osteoporosis. We are now in an era where we can consider using drugs targeted for specific populations or specific combinations,” Dr. Tangpricha commented. This session is on Saturday at 8:15 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.
Boston is the location and inspiration for the featured presentations at the annual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, program chair Vin Tangpricha, MD, PhD, said in an interview.
The program agenda for the congress, held May 16-20, boasts 143 speakers, 66 distinct clinical endocrinology educational sessions, and an opening plenary presentation featuring one of modern medicine’s most renowned diabetes and obesity researchers, according to a statement from the AACE.
The meeting’s theme is “Charting the Future,” an ode to Boston’s reputation for seafaring and medical innovation; Dr. Tangpricha, a professor of medicine at Emory University in Atlanta, gave a preview on how each of the following top sessions by endocrinology luminaries will enhance clinical endocrinologists’ practice.
New Dimensions in Insulin Action and Why They Are Important to Know
C. Ronald Kahn, MD, chief academic officer and head of Integrative Physiology and Metabolism at Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston, pioneered revolutionary work with insulin receptors and insulin resistance in diabetes and obesity. What makes his presentation on Thursday from 8:30 a.m. to 9:15 a.m. a must-see is its focus on the future: “Many new drugs are being developed based on the research on how insulin works. This lecture will be exciting to hear what is in the pipeline for drugs that manipulate insulin action,” Dr. Tangpricha said.
Cushing’s Syndrome
Beta-Cell Regeneration
The work of Andrew F. Stewart, MD, scientific director of the Mount Sinai Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Institute in New York, leads research into the basic mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of metabolic diseases. “In the past, we thought that there was a fixed number of beta cells in the body. However, recent research by Dr. Stewart’s group suggests that beta cells can be stimulated to grow. This is very exciting and can shape the future of how we take care of diabetes,” noted Dr. Tangpricha. The session is on Friday from 8:20 a.m. to 9:05 a.m.
New Insights Into Thyroid Hormone Action
On Thursday from 11:15 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., Anthony N. Hollenberg, MD, will present “an outstanding review on thyroid hormone and action and how this impacts patient care of those with thyroid disease,” Dr. Tangpricha said. Dr. Hollenberg is chief of the thyroid unit and the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.
Current and Evolving Approaches for Osteoporosis Treatment
Sundeep Khosla, MD, an expert on bone loss, will distill the myriad osteoporosis treatments into useful information that can inform your practice now. “There have been a number of drugs that have been released for the treatment of osteoporosis. We are now in an era where we can consider using drugs targeted for specific populations or specific combinations,” Dr. Tangpricha commented. This session is on Saturday at 8:15 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.
FROM AACE 2018
Original research expands at AACE 2018
This year’s meeting, in Boston May 16-20, has brought in a record number of accepted abstracts – 1,126 – in all areas of endocrinology. The lion’s share focuses on diabetes, thyroid disease, and bone disease. Most will be presented in Poster Viewing and Judging sessions at 10:00 a.m on Thursday for young investigators and during a poster viewing and wine and cheese reception from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Friday for senior investigators.
The three winning abstracts of the poster competition among young investigators will be presented on Thursday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m., and those for senior investigators will be discussed at the same time on Friday. Oral presentations of the overall winners can be heard at a late-breaking abstracts session on Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. All presentations will be in the exhibit hall.
Of note, the mother lode of clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and registry studies will be shown at the senior investigator competition on Friday evening.
That viewing session will include two post hoc analyses of data from the global SUSTAIN trial program in the investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide. The first, Abstract 245, examines whether reductions in body weight and HbA1c differed between elderly and younger patients in SUSTAIN 7. The second, Abstract 298, is an analysis of SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7, looking at semaglutide’s effectiveness across racial and ethnic subgroups.
Another large trial, CANVAS, will be represented in two abstracts in this Friday session. In CANVAS, canagliflozin for primary prevention didn’t significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with at-risk type 2 diabetes, but it did so convincingly in a secondary prevention population. Outcomes by age group will be presented in Abstract 233, while those by changes in HbA1c and use of antihyperglycemic drugs will be presented in Abstract 262.
Other studies of interest in this viewing session include but are not limited to a comparison of the effects of hypnosis and certified diabetes educators on weight loss and changes in HbA1c levels (Abstract 602) and an investigation into whether the anabolic agent teriparatide can aid in foot bone remodeling in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (Abstract 225).
This year’s meeting, in Boston May 16-20, has brought in a record number of accepted abstracts – 1,126 – in all areas of endocrinology. The lion’s share focuses on diabetes, thyroid disease, and bone disease. Most will be presented in Poster Viewing and Judging sessions at 10:00 a.m on Thursday for young investigators and during a poster viewing and wine and cheese reception from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Friday for senior investigators.
The three winning abstracts of the poster competition among young investigators will be presented on Thursday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m., and those for senior investigators will be discussed at the same time on Friday. Oral presentations of the overall winners can be heard at a late-breaking abstracts session on Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. All presentations will be in the exhibit hall.
Of note, the mother lode of clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and registry studies will be shown at the senior investigator competition on Friday evening.
That viewing session will include two post hoc analyses of data from the global SUSTAIN trial program in the investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide. The first, Abstract 245, examines whether reductions in body weight and HbA1c differed between elderly and younger patients in SUSTAIN 7. The second, Abstract 298, is an analysis of SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7, looking at semaglutide’s effectiveness across racial and ethnic subgroups.
Another large trial, CANVAS, will be represented in two abstracts in this Friday session. In CANVAS, canagliflozin for primary prevention didn’t significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with at-risk type 2 diabetes, but it did so convincingly in a secondary prevention population. Outcomes by age group will be presented in Abstract 233, while those by changes in HbA1c and use of antihyperglycemic drugs will be presented in Abstract 262.
Other studies of interest in this viewing session include but are not limited to a comparison of the effects of hypnosis and certified diabetes educators on weight loss and changes in HbA1c levels (Abstract 602) and an investigation into whether the anabolic agent teriparatide can aid in foot bone remodeling in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (Abstract 225).
This year’s meeting, in Boston May 16-20, has brought in a record number of accepted abstracts – 1,126 – in all areas of endocrinology. The lion’s share focuses on diabetes, thyroid disease, and bone disease. Most will be presented in Poster Viewing and Judging sessions at 10:00 a.m on Thursday for young investigators and during a poster viewing and wine and cheese reception from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Friday for senior investigators.
The three winning abstracts of the poster competition among young investigators will be presented on Thursday from 12:00 p.m. to 12:45 p.m., and those for senior investigators will be discussed at the same time on Friday. Oral presentations of the overall winners can be heard at a late-breaking abstracts session on Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. All presentations will be in the exhibit hall.
Of note, the mother lode of clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and registry studies will be shown at the senior investigator competition on Friday evening.
That viewing session will include two post hoc analyses of data from the global SUSTAIN trial program in the investigational GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide. The first, Abstract 245, examines whether reductions in body weight and HbA1c differed between elderly and younger patients in SUSTAIN 7. The second, Abstract 298, is an analysis of SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7, looking at semaglutide’s effectiveness across racial and ethnic subgroups.
Another large trial, CANVAS, will be represented in two abstracts in this Friday session. In CANVAS, canagliflozin for primary prevention didn’t significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with at-risk type 2 diabetes, but it did so convincingly in a secondary prevention population. Outcomes by age group will be presented in Abstract 233, while those by changes in HbA1c and use of antihyperglycemic drugs will be presented in Abstract 262.
Other studies of interest in this viewing session include but are not limited to a comparison of the effects of hypnosis and certified diabetes educators on weight loss and changes in HbA1c levels (Abstract 602) and an investigation into whether the anabolic agent teriparatide can aid in foot bone remodeling in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (Abstract 225).
FROM AACE 2018
FDA approves dabrafenib/trametinib for BRAF-positive anaplastic thyroid cancer
FDA approval was based on results from an open-label clinical trial of patients with various rare, BRAF V600E–positive cancers. In a group of 23 patients, 57% experienced a partial response and 4% experienced a full response. In the response group, nine patients had no significant tumor growth for a period of at least 6 months.
The most common side effects of dabrafenib/trametinib are fever, rash, chills, headache, joint pain, cough, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, dry skin, decreased appetite, edema, hemorrhage, high blood pressure, and difficulty breathing. Both drugs can cause damage to developing fetuses, and women should be advised to use proper contraception.
“This approval demonstrates that targeting the same molecular pathway in diverse diseases is an effective way to expedite the development of treatments that may help more patients,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, said in the press release.
Find the full press release on the FDA website.
FDA approval was based on results from an open-label clinical trial of patients with various rare, BRAF V600E–positive cancers. In a group of 23 patients, 57% experienced a partial response and 4% experienced a full response. In the response group, nine patients had no significant tumor growth for a period of at least 6 months.
The most common side effects of dabrafenib/trametinib are fever, rash, chills, headache, joint pain, cough, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, dry skin, decreased appetite, edema, hemorrhage, high blood pressure, and difficulty breathing. Both drugs can cause damage to developing fetuses, and women should be advised to use proper contraception.
“This approval demonstrates that targeting the same molecular pathway in diverse diseases is an effective way to expedite the development of treatments that may help more patients,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, said in the press release.
Find the full press release on the FDA website.
FDA approval was based on results from an open-label clinical trial of patients with various rare, BRAF V600E–positive cancers. In a group of 23 patients, 57% experienced a partial response and 4% experienced a full response. In the response group, nine patients had no significant tumor growth for a period of at least 6 months.
The most common side effects of dabrafenib/trametinib are fever, rash, chills, headache, joint pain, cough, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, dry skin, decreased appetite, edema, hemorrhage, high blood pressure, and difficulty breathing. Both drugs can cause damage to developing fetuses, and women should be advised to use proper contraception.
“This approval demonstrates that targeting the same molecular pathway in diverse diseases is an effective way to expedite the development of treatments that may help more patients,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, said in the press release.
Find the full press release on the FDA website.
Prolactin, the pituitary, and pregnancy: Where’s the balance?
CHICAGO – Management of fertility and reproduction for women with prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors is a balancing act, often in the absence of robust data to support clinical decision making. So judgment, communication, and paying attention to the patient become paramount considerations, said endocrinologist Mark Molitch, MD, speaking at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The first step: restoring fertility
“Remember that our patients that have hyperprolactinemia are generally infertile,” said Dr. Molitch, Martha Leland Sherwin Professor of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago. “You really need to restore prolactin levels to close to normal, or normal, to allow ovulation to occur,” he said.
Dr. Molitch noted that up to 94% of women with hyperprolactinemia will initially have anovulation, amenorrhea, and infertility, but restoration of normal prolactin levels usually corrects these.
“If you have a patient where you are unable to restore prolactin levels to normal, there are other methods” to consider. Patients may end up using clomiphene, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or gonadotropins, or even moving to in vitro fertilization in these cases, said Dr. Molitch.
Preferable to any of these, though, is achieving normal prolactin levels.
In patients who are hyperprolactinemic, “the major action is occurring at the hypothalamic level,” with decreases in pulsatile secretion of GnRH, said Dr. Molitch. Next, there are resultant decreases in gonadotropin secretion, which in turn interrupt the ovary’s normal physiology. “There’s also an interruption in positive estrogen feedback in this cycle,” he said.
“So what’s new in this area is kisspeptin,” Dr. Molitch said, adding that the peptide activates the G-protein coupled receptor GPR54, found in the hypothalamus and pituitary. Infusion of kisspeptin stimulates secretion of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, and testosterone. Conversely, mutations that inactivate GPR43 result in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, while activating mutations are associated with centrally caused precocious puberty (Biol Reprod. 2011 Oct;85[4]:650-60; Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011 Oct 22;346[1-2]:29-3).
From this and other work, endocrinologists now know that kisspeptin is “very likely involved in puberty initiation and in response to fasting,” said Dr. Molitch. It’s now thought that high prolactin levels alter kisspeptin levels, “which then causes the further downstream effects,” said Dr. Molitch.
Dopamine agonists and pregnancy
Dopamine agonists are the primary therapies used for patients with prolactinomas and hyperprolactinemia. In patients seeking fertility, the dopamine agonist is usually continued just through the first few weeks of pregnancy, until the patient misses her first menstrual period, he said.
Establishing the menstrual interval is key to knowing when to stop the dopamine agonist, though. “We often use barrier contraceptives, so we can tell what the menstrual interval is – so we can tell when somebody’s missed her period,” Dr. Molitch explained.
“Most of the safety data on these drugs … are based on that relatively short period of exposure,” said Dr. Molitch. “As far as long-term use during pregnancy, only about 100 patients who took bromocriptine throughout pregnancy have been reported,” with two minor fetal anomalies reported from this series of patients, he said.
Though fewer than 20 cases have been reported of cabergoline being continued throughout a pregnancy, “there have not been any problems with that,” said Dr. Molitch.
Overall, over 6,000 pregnancies with bromocriptine exposure, as well as over 1,000 with cabergoline, have now been reported.
Dr. Molitch summarized the aggregate safety data for each dopamine agonist: “When we look at the adverse outcomes that occurred with either of these drugs, as far as spontaneous abortions or terminations, premature deliveries, multiple births, and, of course, the most important thing here being major malformations … in neither drug is there an increase in these adverse outcomes” (J Endocrinol Invest. 2018 Jan;41[1]:129-41).
“In my own mind now, I think that the number of cases with cabergoline now is quite sufficient to justify the safety of its use during pregnancy,” Dr. Molitch said. “However, this is sort of an individualized decision between you – the clinician – as well as your patient to make”: whether to trust the 1,000-case–strong data for cabergoline. “I no longer change patients from cabergoline to bromocriptine because of safety concerns. I think that cabergoline is perfectly safe,” he added.
What if the tumor grows in pregnancy?
During pregnancy, high estrogen levels from the placenta can stimulate prolactinoma growth, and the dopamine agonist’s inhibitory effect is gone once that medication’s been stopped. This means that “We have both a ‘push’ and a decrease in the ‘pull’ here, so you may have tumor enlargement,” said Dr. Molitch.
The risk for tumor enlargement in microadenomas is about 2.4%, and ranges to about 16% for enlargement of macroadenomas during pregnancy. For macroadenomas, “you might consider a prepregnancy debulking of the tumor,” Dr. Molitch said.
It’s reasonable to stop a dopamine agonist once pregnancy’s been established in a patient with a prolactinoma, and “follow the patient symptomatically every few months,” letting suspicious new symptoms like visual changes or headaches be the prompt for visual field exam and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast, said Dr. Molitch.
Though it’s not FDA approved, consideration can be given to continuing a dopamine agonist in a patient with a large prepregnancy adenoma throughout pregnancy – and if the tumor is enlarging significantly, the dopamine agonist should be restarted if it’s been withheld, said Dr. Molitch. Finally, surgery is the option if an enlarging tumor doesn’t respond to a dopamine agonist, unless the pregnancy is far enough along that delivery is a safe option.
“It’s important to actually document that there’s tumor enlargement, because if you’re going to do something like restarting a drug or even surgery, you really want to make sure that it’s the enlarging tumor that’s causing the problem,” said Dr. Molitch.
Postpartum prolactinoma considerations
Postpartum, even though prolactin secretion is upped by nursing, “there are no data to show that lactation stimulates tumor growth,” said Dr. Molitch. “I don’t see that there’s any problem with somebody nursing if they choose to do so.” However, “You certainly cannot restart the dopamine agonist, because that will lower prolactin levels and prevent that person from being able to nurse,” he said.
For reasons that are not clear, prolactin levels often drop post partum. Accordingly, it’s a reasonable approach in a nursing mother with mildly elevated prolactin levels to wait until nursing is done to see if menses resume spontaneously before restarting the dopamine agonist, said Dr. Molitch.
Dr. Molitch reported receiving fees and research funding from several pharmaceutical companies. He also disclosed that his spouse holds stock in Amgen.
SOURCE: Molitch M ENDO 2018. Abstract M02-2.
CHICAGO – Management of fertility and reproduction for women with prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors is a balancing act, often in the absence of robust data to support clinical decision making. So judgment, communication, and paying attention to the patient become paramount considerations, said endocrinologist Mark Molitch, MD, speaking at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The first step: restoring fertility
“Remember that our patients that have hyperprolactinemia are generally infertile,” said Dr. Molitch, Martha Leland Sherwin Professor of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago. “You really need to restore prolactin levels to close to normal, or normal, to allow ovulation to occur,” he said.
Dr. Molitch noted that up to 94% of women with hyperprolactinemia will initially have anovulation, amenorrhea, and infertility, but restoration of normal prolactin levels usually corrects these.
“If you have a patient where you are unable to restore prolactin levels to normal, there are other methods” to consider. Patients may end up using clomiphene, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or gonadotropins, or even moving to in vitro fertilization in these cases, said Dr. Molitch.
Preferable to any of these, though, is achieving normal prolactin levels.
In patients who are hyperprolactinemic, “the major action is occurring at the hypothalamic level,” with decreases in pulsatile secretion of GnRH, said Dr. Molitch. Next, there are resultant decreases in gonadotropin secretion, which in turn interrupt the ovary’s normal physiology. “There’s also an interruption in positive estrogen feedback in this cycle,” he said.
“So what’s new in this area is kisspeptin,” Dr. Molitch said, adding that the peptide activates the G-protein coupled receptor GPR54, found in the hypothalamus and pituitary. Infusion of kisspeptin stimulates secretion of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, and testosterone. Conversely, mutations that inactivate GPR43 result in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, while activating mutations are associated with centrally caused precocious puberty (Biol Reprod. 2011 Oct;85[4]:650-60; Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011 Oct 22;346[1-2]:29-3).
From this and other work, endocrinologists now know that kisspeptin is “very likely involved in puberty initiation and in response to fasting,” said Dr. Molitch. It’s now thought that high prolactin levels alter kisspeptin levels, “which then causes the further downstream effects,” said Dr. Molitch.
Dopamine agonists and pregnancy
Dopamine agonists are the primary therapies used for patients with prolactinomas and hyperprolactinemia. In patients seeking fertility, the dopamine agonist is usually continued just through the first few weeks of pregnancy, until the patient misses her first menstrual period, he said.
Establishing the menstrual interval is key to knowing when to stop the dopamine agonist, though. “We often use barrier contraceptives, so we can tell what the menstrual interval is – so we can tell when somebody’s missed her period,” Dr. Molitch explained.
“Most of the safety data on these drugs … are based on that relatively short period of exposure,” said Dr. Molitch. “As far as long-term use during pregnancy, only about 100 patients who took bromocriptine throughout pregnancy have been reported,” with two minor fetal anomalies reported from this series of patients, he said.
Though fewer than 20 cases have been reported of cabergoline being continued throughout a pregnancy, “there have not been any problems with that,” said Dr. Molitch.
Overall, over 6,000 pregnancies with bromocriptine exposure, as well as over 1,000 with cabergoline, have now been reported.
Dr. Molitch summarized the aggregate safety data for each dopamine agonist: “When we look at the adverse outcomes that occurred with either of these drugs, as far as spontaneous abortions or terminations, premature deliveries, multiple births, and, of course, the most important thing here being major malformations … in neither drug is there an increase in these adverse outcomes” (J Endocrinol Invest. 2018 Jan;41[1]:129-41).
“In my own mind now, I think that the number of cases with cabergoline now is quite sufficient to justify the safety of its use during pregnancy,” Dr. Molitch said. “However, this is sort of an individualized decision between you – the clinician – as well as your patient to make”: whether to trust the 1,000-case–strong data for cabergoline. “I no longer change patients from cabergoline to bromocriptine because of safety concerns. I think that cabergoline is perfectly safe,” he added.
What if the tumor grows in pregnancy?
During pregnancy, high estrogen levels from the placenta can stimulate prolactinoma growth, and the dopamine agonist’s inhibitory effect is gone once that medication’s been stopped. This means that “We have both a ‘push’ and a decrease in the ‘pull’ here, so you may have tumor enlargement,” said Dr. Molitch.
The risk for tumor enlargement in microadenomas is about 2.4%, and ranges to about 16% for enlargement of macroadenomas during pregnancy. For macroadenomas, “you might consider a prepregnancy debulking of the tumor,” Dr. Molitch said.
It’s reasonable to stop a dopamine agonist once pregnancy’s been established in a patient with a prolactinoma, and “follow the patient symptomatically every few months,” letting suspicious new symptoms like visual changes or headaches be the prompt for visual field exam and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast, said Dr. Molitch.
Though it’s not FDA approved, consideration can be given to continuing a dopamine agonist in a patient with a large prepregnancy adenoma throughout pregnancy – and if the tumor is enlarging significantly, the dopamine agonist should be restarted if it’s been withheld, said Dr. Molitch. Finally, surgery is the option if an enlarging tumor doesn’t respond to a dopamine agonist, unless the pregnancy is far enough along that delivery is a safe option.
“It’s important to actually document that there’s tumor enlargement, because if you’re going to do something like restarting a drug or even surgery, you really want to make sure that it’s the enlarging tumor that’s causing the problem,” said Dr. Molitch.
Postpartum prolactinoma considerations
Postpartum, even though prolactin secretion is upped by nursing, “there are no data to show that lactation stimulates tumor growth,” said Dr. Molitch. “I don’t see that there’s any problem with somebody nursing if they choose to do so.” However, “You certainly cannot restart the dopamine agonist, because that will lower prolactin levels and prevent that person from being able to nurse,” he said.
For reasons that are not clear, prolactin levels often drop post partum. Accordingly, it’s a reasonable approach in a nursing mother with mildly elevated prolactin levels to wait until nursing is done to see if menses resume spontaneously before restarting the dopamine agonist, said Dr. Molitch.
Dr. Molitch reported receiving fees and research funding from several pharmaceutical companies. He also disclosed that his spouse holds stock in Amgen.
SOURCE: Molitch M ENDO 2018. Abstract M02-2.
CHICAGO – Management of fertility and reproduction for women with prolactin-secreting pituitary tumors is a balancing act, often in the absence of robust data to support clinical decision making. So judgment, communication, and paying attention to the patient become paramount considerations, said endocrinologist Mark Molitch, MD, speaking at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
The first step: restoring fertility
“Remember that our patients that have hyperprolactinemia are generally infertile,” said Dr. Molitch, Martha Leland Sherwin Professor of Medicine at Northwestern University, Chicago. “You really need to restore prolactin levels to close to normal, or normal, to allow ovulation to occur,” he said.
Dr. Molitch noted that up to 94% of women with hyperprolactinemia will initially have anovulation, amenorrhea, and infertility, but restoration of normal prolactin levels usually corrects these.
“If you have a patient where you are unable to restore prolactin levels to normal, there are other methods” to consider. Patients may end up using clomiphene, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or gonadotropins, or even moving to in vitro fertilization in these cases, said Dr. Molitch.
Preferable to any of these, though, is achieving normal prolactin levels.
In patients who are hyperprolactinemic, “the major action is occurring at the hypothalamic level,” with decreases in pulsatile secretion of GnRH, said Dr. Molitch. Next, there are resultant decreases in gonadotropin secretion, which in turn interrupt the ovary’s normal physiology. “There’s also an interruption in positive estrogen feedback in this cycle,” he said.
“So what’s new in this area is kisspeptin,” Dr. Molitch said, adding that the peptide activates the G-protein coupled receptor GPR54, found in the hypothalamus and pituitary. Infusion of kisspeptin stimulates secretion of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, and testosterone. Conversely, mutations that inactivate GPR43 result in hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, while activating mutations are associated with centrally caused precocious puberty (Biol Reprod. 2011 Oct;85[4]:650-60; Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011 Oct 22;346[1-2]:29-3).
From this and other work, endocrinologists now know that kisspeptin is “very likely involved in puberty initiation and in response to fasting,” said Dr. Molitch. It’s now thought that high prolactin levels alter kisspeptin levels, “which then causes the further downstream effects,” said Dr. Molitch.
Dopamine agonists and pregnancy
Dopamine agonists are the primary therapies used for patients with prolactinomas and hyperprolactinemia. In patients seeking fertility, the dopamine agonist is usually continued just through the first few weeks of pregnancy, until the patient misses her first menstrual period, he said.
Establishing the menstrual interval is key to knowing when to stop the dopamine agonist, though. “We often use barrier contraceptives, so we can tell what the menstrual interval is – so we can tell when somebody’s missed her period,” Dr. Molitch explained.
“Most of the safety data on these drugs … are based on that relatively short period of exposure,” said Dr. Molitch. “As far as long-term use during pregnancy, only about 100 patients who took bromocriptine throughout pregnancy have been reported,” with two minor fetal anomalies reported from this series of patients, he said.
Though fewer than 20 cases have been reported of cabergoline being continued throughout a pregnancy, “there have not been any problems with that,” said Dr. Molitch.
Overall, over 6,000 pregnancies with bromocriptine exposure, as well as over 1,000 with cabergoline, have now been reported.
Dr. Molitch summarized the aggregate safety data for each dopamine agonist: “When we look at the adverse outcomes that occurred with either of these drugs, as far as spontaneous abortions or terminations, premature deliveries, multiple births, and, of course, the most important thing here being major malformations … in neither drug is there an increase in these adverse outcomes” (J Endocrinol Invest. 2018 Jan;41[1]:129-41).
“In my own mind now, I think that the number of cases with cabergoline now is quite sufficient to justify the safety of its use during pregnancy,” Dr. Molitch said. “However, this is sort of an individualized decision between you – the clinician – as well as your patient to make”: whether to trust the 1,000-case–strong data for cabergoline. “I no longer change patients from cabergoline to bromocriptine because of safety concerns. I think that cabergoline is perfectly safe,” he added.
What if the tumor grows in pregnancy?
During pregnancy, high estrogen levels from the placenta can stimulate prolactinoma growth, and the dopamine agonist’s inhibitory effect is gone once that medication’s been stopped. This means that “We have both a ‘push’ and a decrease in the ‘pull’ here, so you may have tumor enlargement,” said Dr. Molitch.
The risk for tumor enlargement in microadenomas is about 2.4%, and ranges to about 16% for enlargement of macroadenomas during pregnancy. For macroadenomas, “you might consider a prepregnancy debulking of the tumor,” Dr. Molitch said.
It’s reasonable to stop a dopamine agonist once pregnancy’s been established in a patient with a prolactinoma, and “follow the patient symptomatically every few months,” letting suspicious new symptoms like visual changes or headaches be the prompt for visual field exam and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast, said Dr. Molitch.
Though it’s not FDA approved, consideration can be given to continuing a dopamine agonist in a patient with a large prepregnancy adenoma throughout pregnancy – and if the tumor is enlarging significantly, the dopamine agonist should be restarted if it’s been withheld, said Dr. Molitch. Finally, surgery is the option if an enlarging tumor doesn’t respond to a dopamine agonist, unless the pregnancy is far enough along that delivery is a safe option.
“It’s important to actually document that there’s tumor enlargement, because if you’re going to do something like restarting a drug or even surgery, you really want to make sure that it’s the enlarging tumor that’s causing the problem,” said Dr. Molitch.
Postpartum prolactinoma considerations
Postpartum, even though prolactin secretion is upped by nursing, “there are no data to show that lactation stimulates tumor growth,” said Dr. Molitch. “I don’t see that there’s any problem with somebody nursing if they choose to do so.” However, “You certainly cannot restart the dopamine agonist, because that will lower prolactin levels and prevent that person from being able to nurse,” he said.
For reasons that are not clear, prolactin levels often drop post partum. Accordingly, it’s a reasonable approach in a nursing mother with mildly elevated prolactin levels to wait until nursing is done to see if menses resume spontaneously before restarting the dopamine agonist, said Dr. Molitch.
Dr. Molitch reported receiving fees and research funding from several pharmaceutical companies. He also disclosed that his spouse holds stock in Amgen.
SOURCE: Molitch M ENDO 2018. Abstract M02-2.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Empiric fluid restriction cuts transsphenoidal surgery readmissions
CHICAGO – A 70% drop in 30-day was achieved at the University of Colorado, Aurora, after endocrinologists there restricted fluid for the first 2 weeks postop, according to a report at the Endocrine Society annual meeting.
The antidiuretic hormone (ADH) rebound following pituitary adenoma resection often leads to fluid retention, and potentially dangerous hyponatremia, in about 25% of patients. It’s the leading cause of readmission for this procedure, occurring in up to 15% of patients.
To counter the problem, endocrinology fellow Kelsi Deaver, MD, and her colleagues limited patients to 1.5 L of fluid for 2 weeks after discharge, with a serum sodium check at day 7. If the sodium level was normal, patients remained on 1.5 L until the 2-week postop visit. If levels trended upward – a sign of dehydration – restrictions were eased to 2 or even 3 L, which is about the normal daily intake. If sodium levels trended downward, fluids were tightened to 1-1.2 L, or patients were brought in for further workup. The discharge packet included a 1.5-L cup so patients could track their intake.
Among 118 patients studied before the protocol was implemented in September 2015, 9 (7.6%) were readmitted for symptomatic hyponatremia within 30 days. Among 169 studied after the implementation of the fluid restriction protocol, just 4 (2.4%) were readmitted for hyponatremia (P = .044).
“What was surprising is that we did not have any readmissions for dehydration/hypernatremia. That was the biggest [concern] among physicians, that we are going to dry out these patients and they would come back severely dehydrated. We didn’t see that.” With the protocol’s success, “this is now the routine management that all our endocrinologist attendings use,” Dr. Deaver said.
At present, there are no widely accepted postop fluid management guidelines for transsphenoidal surgery, but some hospitals have taken similar steps, she said.
It was the fluid restriction, not the 7-day sodium check, that drove the results. Among the four readmissions after the protocol took effect, two patients had their sodium checked, and two did not because their sodium drop was so precipitous that they were back in the hospital before the week was out. Overall, only about 70% of patients got their sodium checked as instructed.
Fluid restriction isn’t easy for patients. “The last day before discharge, we try to coach them through it,” with tips about sucking on ice chips and other strategies; “anything really to help them through it,” Dr. Deaver said.
Readmitted patients were no different from others in terms of pituitary tumor subtype, tumor size, gender, and other factors. “We couldn’t find any predictors,” she said. There were a higher percentage of macroadenomas in the preimplementation patients (91.5% versus 81.7%), but they were otherwise similar to postimplementation patients.
Those with evidence of diabetes insipidus at discharge were excluded from the study.
The National Institutes of Health funded the study. The investigators did not have any disclosures.
SOURCE: Deaver KE et al. Endocrine Society 2018 annual meeting abstract SUN-572.
CHICAGO – A 70% drop in 30-day was achieved at the University of Colorado, Aurora, after endocrinologists there restricted fluid for the first 2 weeks postop, according to a report at the Endocrine Society annual meeting.
The antidiuretic hormone (ADH) rebound following pituitary adenoma resection often leads to fluid retention, and potentially dangerous hyponatremia, in about 25% of patients. It’s the leading cause of readmission for this procedure, occurring in up to 15% of patients.
To counter the problem, endocrinology fellow Kelsi Deaver, MD, and her colleagues limited patients to 1.5 L of fluid for 2 weeks after discharge, with a serum sodium check at day 7. If the sodium level was normal, patients remained on 1.5 L until the 2-week postop visit. If levels trended upward – a sign of dehydration – restrictions were eased to 2 or even 3 L, which is about the normal daily intake. If sodium levels trended downward, fluids were tightened to 1-1.2 L, or patients were brought in for further workup. The discharge packet included a 1.5-L cup so patients could track their intake.
Among 118 patients studied before the protocol was implemented in September 2015, 9 (7.6%) were readmitted for symptomatic hyponatremia within 30 days. Among 169 studied after the implementation of the fluid restriction protocol, just 4 (2.4%) were readmitted for hyponatremia (P = .044).
“What was surprising is that we did not have any readmissions for dehydration/hypernatremia. That was the biggest [concern] among physicians, that we are going to dry out these patients and they would come back severely dehydrated. We didn’t see that.” With the protocol’s success, “this is now the routine management that all our endocrinologist attendings use,” Dr. Deaver said.
At present, there are no widely accepted postop fluid management guidelines for transsphenoidal surgery, but some hospitals have taken similar steps, she said.
It was the fluid restriction, not the 7-day sodium check, that drove the results. Among the four readmissions after the protocol took effect, two patients had their sodium checked, and two did not because their sodium drop was so precipitous that they were back in the hospital before the week was out. Overall, only about 70% of patients got their sodium checked as instructed.
Fluid restriction isn’t easy for patients. “The last day before discharge, we try to coach them through it,” with tips about sucking on ice chips and other strategies; “anything really to help them through it,” Dr. Deaver said.
Readmitted patients were no different from others in terms of pituitary tumor subtype, tumor size, gender, and other factors. “We couldn’t find any predictors,” she said. There were a higher percentage of macroadenomas in the preimplementation patients (91.5% versus 81.7%), but they were otherwise similar to postimplementation patients.
Those with evidence of diabetes insipidus at discharge were excluded from the study.
The National Institutes of Health funded the study. The investigators did not have any disclosures.
SOURCE: Deaver KE et al. Endocrine Society 2018 annual meeting abstract SUN-572.
CHICAGO – A 70% drop in 30-day was achieved at the University of Colorado, Aurora, after endocrinologists there restricted fluid for the first 2 weeks postop, according to a report at the Endocrine Society annual meeting.
The antidiuretic hormone (ADH) rebound following pituitary adenoma resection often leads to fluid retention, and potentially dangerous hyponatremia, in about 25% of patients. It’s the leading cause of readmission for this procedure, occurring in up to 15% of patients.
To counter the problem, endocrinology fellow Kelsi Deaver, MD, and her colleagues limited patients to 1.5 L of fluid for 2 weeks after discharge, with a serum sodium check at day 7. If the sodium level was normal, patients remained on 1.5 L until the 2-week postop visit. If levels trended upward – a sign of dehydration – restrictions were eased to 2 or even 3 L, which is about the normal daily intake. If sodium levels trended downward, fluids were tightened to 1-1.2 L, or patients were brought in for further workup. The discharge packet included a 1.5-L cup so patients could track their intake.
Among 118 patients studied before the protocol was implemented in September 2015, 9 (7.6%) were readmitted for symptomatic hyponatremia within 30 days. Among 169 studied after the implementation of the fluid restriction protocol, just 4 (2.4%) were readmitted for hyponatremia (P = .044).
“What was surprising is that we did not have any readmissions for dehydration/hypernatremia. That was the biggest [concern] among physicians, that we are going to dry out these patients and they would come back severely dehydrated. We didn’t see that.” With the protocol’s success, “this is now the routine management that all our endocrinologist attendings use,” Dr. Deaver said.
At present, there are no widely accepted postop fluid management guidelines for transsphenoidal surgery, but some hospitals have taken similar steps, she said.
It was the fluid restriction, not the 7-day sodium check, that drove the results. Among the four readmissions after the protocol took effect, two patients had their sodium checked, and two did not because their sodium drop was so precipitous that they were back in the hospital before the week was out. Overall, only about 70% of patients got their sodium checked as instructed.
Fluid restriction isn’t easy for patients. “The last day before discharge, we try to coach them through it,” with tips about sucking on ice chips and other strategies; “anything really to help them through it,” Dr. Deaver said.
Readmitted patients were no different from others in terms of pituitary tumor subtype, tumor size, gender, and other factors. “We couldn’t find any predictors,” she said. There were a higher percentage of macroadenomas in the preimplementation patients (91.5% versus 81.7%), but they were otherwise similar to postimplementation patients.
Those with evidence of diabetes insipidus at discharge were excluded from the study.
The National Institutes of Health funded the study. The investigators did not have any disclosures.
SOURCE: Deaver KE et al. Endocrine Society 2018 annual meeting abstract SUN-572.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Key clinical point: A simple fluid restriction protocol cuts readmissions 70% following transsphenoidal surgery.
Major finding: The readmission rate among the transsphenoidal surgery patients was 7.6% before the fluid restriction protocol was implemented, compared with 2.4% (P = .044) afterward.
Study details: Review of 287 transsphenoidal surgery patients.
Disclosures: The National Institutes of Health supported the work. The investigators did not have any disclosures.
Source: Deaver KE et al. Abstract SUN-572
MDedge Daily News: Antibiotic resistance leads to ‘nightmare’ bacteria
cognitive decline. Levothyroxine comes with risks for older patients. And Medicare formulary changes could be on the way.
PPIs aren’t responsible forListen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
cognitive decline. Levothyroxine comes with risks for older patients. And Medicare formulary changes could be on the way.
PPIs aren’t responsible forListen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
cognitive decline. Levothyroxine comes with risks for older patients. And Medicare formulary changes could be on the way.
PPIs aren’t responsible forListen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
Levothyroxine may increase mortality in older patients
CHICAGO – according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
With increased mortality and similar prevalence of atrial fibrillation and femoral fractures between study and control groups, physicians may want to reevaluate giving their elderly patients levothyroxine until more information is available, according to presenter Joseph Meyerovitch, MD, of Schneider Children’s Medical Center, Ramat Hasharon, Israel.
The case-control study included 416 patients 65 years or older with TSH levels of 4.2-10 mIU/L who died between 2012 and 2016, and 1,461 patients with comparable TSH levels who did not die during that time.
Most of the patients in both the control and study group were women. The average age of the patients was 84 years, and most had some form of dementia or senility (86.4%).
Mortality was 19% more likely in the group taking levothyroxine, according to an analysis by Dr. Meyerovitch and his fellow investigators.
When broken down further, presence of certain comorbidities increased mortality dramatically, including dementia (odds ratio, 1.61), heart failure (OR, 2.67), chronic renal failure (OR, 1.89), and cerebrovascular disease (OR, 1.94).
There was no significant difference in prevalence of atrial fibrillation between the test and control groups with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) testing, nor any difference in femur fracture prevalence.
Patients were given a TSH test three times during follow-up and showed significantly lower TSH levels compared with controls, according to Dr. Meyerovitch.
Dr. Meyerovitch acknowledged that the data he and his team used did not include the reason for a TSH evaluation, nor why patients began levothyroxine treatment. This leaves unanswered questions about the initial baseline mortality risk in patients included in the study.
“This may have resulted in treatment of patients with a higher risk, since we don’t know the reason for the treatment,” he said. “There may have been other reasons that were not included in the database that caused the physician to treat with levothyroxine.”
Details on the cause of death were not included.
Despite these limitations, Dr. Meyerovitch and his team stressed the need for more research before continuing to recommend this treatment to their elderly patients.
Dr. Meyerovitch reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Meyerovitch J et al. ENDO 2018 Abstract OR34-2.
CHICAGO – according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
With increased mortality and similar prevalence of atrial fibrillation and femoral fractures between study and control groups, physicians may want to reevaluate giving their elderly patients levothyroxine until more information is available, according to presenter Joseph Meyerovitch, MD, of Schneider Children’s Medical Center, Ramat Hasharon, Israel.
The case-control study included 416 patients 65 years or older with TSH levels of 4.2-10 mIU/L who died between 2012 and 2016, and 1,461 patients with comparable TSH levels who did not die during that time.
Most of the patients in both the control and study group were women. The average age of the patients was 84 years, and most had some form of dementia or senility (86.4%).
Mortality was 19% more likely in the group taking levothyroxine, according to an analysis by Dr. Meyerovitch and his fellow investigators.
When broken down further, presence of certain comorbidities increased mortality dramatically, including dementia (odds ratio, 1.61), heart failure (OR, 2.67), chronic renal failure (OR, 1.89), and cerebrovascular disease (OR, 1.94).
There was no significant difference in prevalence of atrial fibrillation between the test and control groups with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) testing, nor any difference in femur fracture prevalence.
Patients were given a TSH test three times during follow-up and showed significantly lower TSH levels compared with controls, according to Dr. Meyerovitch.
Dr. Meyerovitch acknowledged that the data he and his team used did not include the reason for a TSH evaluation, nor why patients began levothyroxine treatment. This leaves unanswered questions about the initial baseline mortality risk in patients included in the study.
“This may have resulted in treatment of patients with a higher risk, since we don’t know the reason for the treatment,” he said. “There may have been other reasons that were not included in the database that caused the physician to treat with levothyroxine.”
Details on the cause of death were not included.
Despite these limitations, Dr. Meyerovitch and his team stressed the need for more research before continuing to recommend this treatment to their elderly patients.
Dr. Meyerovitch reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Meyerovitch J et al. ENDO 2018 Abstract OR34-2.
CHICAGO – according to a study presented at the annual meeting of the Endocrine Society.
With increased mortality and similar prevalence of atrial fibrillation and femoral fractures between study and control groups, physicians may want to reevaluate giving their elderly patients levothyroxine until more information is available, according to presenter Joseph Meyerovitch, MD, of Schneider Children’s Medical Center, Ramat Hasharon, Israel.
The case-control study included 416 patients 65 years or older with TSH levels of 4.2-10 mIU/L who died between 2012 and 2016, and 1,461 patients with comparable TSH levels who did not die during that time.
Most of the patients in both the control and study group were women. The average age of the patients was 84 years, and most had some form of dementia or senility (86.4%).
Mortality was 19% more likely in the group taking levothyroxine, according to an analysis by Dr. Meyerovitch and his fellow investigators.
When broken down further, presence of certain comorbidities increased mortality dramatically, including dementia (odds ratio, 1.61), heart failure (OR, 2.67), chronic renal failure (OR, 1.89), and cerebrovascular disease (OR, 1.94).
There was no significant difference in prevalence of atrial fibrillation between the test and control groups with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) testing, nor any difference in femur fracture prevalence.
Patients were given a TSH test three times during follow-up and showed significantly lower TSH levels compared with controls, according to Dr. Meyerovitch.
Dr. Meyerovitch acknowledged that the data he and his team used did not include the reason for a TSH evaluation, nor why patients began levothyroxine treatment. This leaves unanswered questions about the initial baseline mortality risk in patients included in the study.
“This may have resulted in treatment of patients with a higher risk, since we don’t know the reason for the treatment,” he said. “There may have been other reasons that were not included in the database that caused the physician to treat with levothyroxine.”
Details on the cause of death were not included.
Despite these limitations, Dr. Meyerovitch and his team stressed the need for more research before continuing to recommend this treatment to their elderly patients.
Dr. Meyerovitch reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Meyerovitch J et al. ENDO 2018 Abstract OR34-2.
REPORTING FROM ENDO 2018
Key clinical point: Levothyroxine is associated with increased mortality in hypothyroidism patients 65 years and older.
Major finding: Patients who were treated with levothyroxine had an increased rate of mortality of 19% (HR = 1.19) compared to those treated with other methods.
Data source: Case-control study of 416 hypothyroidism patients 65 years or older who died between 2012 and 2016, compared with 1,461 hypothyroidism patients treated in the same period who did not die.
Disclosures: Dr. Meyerovitch reported no relevant financial disclosures.
Source: Meyerovitch J et al. ENDO 2018 Abstract OR34-2.