Reviews

Ms. K, a 24-year-old waitress who lives with her boyfriend, was referred by her primary care physician for evaluation of panic attacks that began “out of nowhere” at work approximately 6 months ago. The unpredictable attacks occur multiple times per week, causing her to leave work and cancel shifts.

Ms. K reports that before the panic attacks began, she felt happy in her relationship, enjoyed hobbies, and was hopeful about the future. However, she has become concerned that a potentially catastrophic illness is causing her panic attacks. She researches her symptoms on the Internet, and is preoccupied with the possibility of sudden death due to an undiagnosed heart condition. Multiple visits to the emergency room have not identified any physical abnormalities. Her primary care doctor prescribed alprazolam, 0.5 mg as needed for panic attacks, which she reports is helpful, “but only in the moment of the attacks.” Ms. K avoids alcohol and illicit substances and limits her caffeine intake. She is not willing to accept that her life “feels so limited.” Her dream of earning a nursing degree and eventually starting a family now seems unattainable.

Panic disorder (PD) occurs in 3% to 5% of adults, with women affected at roughly twice the rate of men.¹ Causing a broad range of distress and varying degrees of impairment, PD commonly occurs with other psychiatric disorders. For most patients, treatment is effective, but those who do not respond to initial approaches require a thoughtful, stepped approach to care. Key considerations include establishing an accurate diagnosis, clarifying comorbid illnesses, ascertaining patient beliefs and expectations, and providing appropriately dosed and maintained treatments.

Panic attacks vs PD

Panic attacks consist of rapid onset of intense anxiety, with prominent somatic symptoms, that peaks within 10 minutes (Figure).² Attacks in which <4 of the listed symptoms occur are considered limited-symptom panic attacks.

Figure: Body locations of panic attack symptoms
Diagnosis of a panic attack requires the sudden development of intense fear or discomfort characterized by ≥4 of the 13 symptoms listed above that peaks in intensity within 10 minutes of onset
Source: Reference 2

Panic attacks can occur with various disorders, including other anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and substance intoxication or withdrawal. Because serious medical conditions can present with panic-like symptoms, the initial occurrence of such symptoms warrants consideration of physiological causes. For a Box² that describes the differential diagnosis of panic attacks, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.

Box

A PD diagnosis requires that repeated panic attacks initially must occur from “out of the blue,” meaning no specific object or situation induced the attack. In addition, the diagnosis requires 1 of 3 types of psychological or behavioral changes as a result of the attacks (Table 1).² Agoraphobia is diagnosed if 1 of the behavioral changes is avoidance of places or situations from which escape might be embarrassing or difficult should an attack occur. A patient can be diagnosed as having PD with agoraphobia, PD without agoraphobia, or agoraphobia without PD (ie, experiences only limited symptom panic attacks, but avoids situations or stimuli associated with them).

Table 1

Definitions of panic disorder and agoraphobia

Comorbidities are common in patients with PD and predict greater difficulty achieving remission (Box).^1,3-6

Box

Treatment begins with education

The goal of treatment is remission of symptoms, ideally including an absence of panic attacks, agoraphobic avoidance, and anticipatory anxiety.¹ The Panic Disorder Severity Scale self-report is a validated measure of panic symptoms that may be useful in clinical practice.⁷

The first step in treatment is educating patients about panic attacks, framing them as an overreactive fear circuit in the brain that produces physical symptoms that are not dangerous. Using a brain model that shows the location of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex—which play crucial roles in generating and controlling anxiety and fear—can make this discussion more concrete.⁸ Although highly simplified, such models allow clinicians to demonstrate that excessive reactivity of limbic regions can be reduced by both top-down (cortico-limbic connections via cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT]) and bottom-up (pharmacotherapy directly acting on limbic structures) approaches. Such discussions lead to treatment recommendations for CBT, pharmacotherapy, or their combination.

No single treatment has emerged as the definitive “best” for PD, and no reliable predictors can guide specific treatment for an individual.³ Combining CBT with pharmacotherapy produces higher short-term response rates than either treatment alone, but in the long term, combination treatment does not appear to be superior to CBT alone.⁹ Base the initial treatment selection for PD on patient preference, treatment availability and cost, and comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions. For an Algorithm to guide treatment decisions, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.

Algorithm: Treatment for panic disorder: A suggested algorithm
^aPoor response to an SSRI should lead to a switch to venlafaxine extended-release, and vice versa
^bBenzodiazepines are relatively contraindicated in geriatric patients and patients with a history of substance abuse or dependence
CBT: cognitive-behavioral therapy; MAOI: monoamine oxidase inhibitor; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA: tricyclic antidepressant; Ven XR: venlafaxine extended-release

First-line treatments

Psychotherapy. CBT is the most efficacious psychotherapy for PD. Twelve to 15 sessions of CBT has demonstrated efficacy for PD, with additional effects on comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms.¹⁰ No large clinical trials of CBT have used cognitive restructuring alone; all have included at least some component of exposure that requires the patient to confront feared physical sensations. Gains during treatment may be steady and gradual or sudden and uneven, with rapid improvement in some but not all symptoms. CBT and pharmacotherapy have demonstrated similar levels of benefit in short-term trials, but CBT has proven superior in most⁹ but not all¹¹ trials evaluating long-term outcomes, particularly compared with pharmacotherapy that is discontinued during follow-up. Although less studied, group CBT also may be considered if a patient cannot afford individual CBT.

Pharmacotherapy. Evidence supports selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), venlafaxine extended-release (XR), benzodiazepines, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) as effective treatments for PD.³ No class of medication has demonstrated superiority over others in short-term treatment.^3,12 Because of the medical risks associated with benzodiazepines and TCAs, an SSRI or venlafaxine XR should be the first medication option for most patients. Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine XR are FDA-approved for PD. Paroxetine is associated with weight gain and may increase the risk for panic recurrence upon discontinuation more than sertraline, making it a less favorable option for many patients.¹³ Start doses at half the normal starting dose used for treating major depressive disorder and continue for 4 to 7 days, then increase to the minimal effective dose. For a Table³ that lists dosing recommendations for antidepressants to treat PD, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com. If there is no improvement by 4 weeks, increase the dose every 2 to 4 weeks until remission is achieved or side effects prevent further dose increases.

Table

Recommended doses for antidepressants used to treat panic disorder

Treatment nonresponse. True non-response needs to be distinguished from poor response caused by inadequate treatment delivery, eg, patients not completing homework assignments in CBT or not adhering to pharmacotherapy. Asking patients about adverse effects or personal and family beliefs about treatment may reveal reasons for nonadherence.

Second-line treatments

Little data are available to guide next-step treatment options in patients who don’t achieve remission from their initial treatment. Patients who benefit from an SSRI, venlafaxine XR, or CBT but still have symptoms should be started on combination treatment. For a patient who experiences complete non-response to the initial treatment, discontinue the first treatment and switch to the other modality. In general, completely ineffective treatments should be discontinued when another treatment is added, but when partial improvement (>30%) occurs, continue the original treatment and augment it with another approach.

For patients pursuing pharmacotherapy, poor response to an adequate SSRI trial usually should lead to a switch to venlafaxine XR, and vice versa. Failure to respond to both of these medication classes should prompt a switch to a benzodiazepine or TCA.

Benzodiazepines are a fast-acting, effective treatment for PD, with efficacy similar to SSRIs in acute and long-term treatment.¹⁴ Benzodiazepines may be prescribed with antidepressants at the beginning of treatment to improve response speed.¹⁵ Clonazepam and alprazolam are FDA-approved for treating PD. A high-potency, long-acting agent, clonazepam is the preferred initial benzodiazepine, dosed 0.5 to 4 mg/d on a fixed schedule. Although substantial data support using alprazolam for PD, it requires more frequent dosing and has a greater risk of rebound anxiety and abuse potential because of its more rapid onset of action. Compared with immediate-release alprazolam, alprazolam XR has a slower absorption rate and longer steady state in the blood, but this formulation does not have lower abuse potential or greater efficacy. Although not FDA-approved for PD, diazepam and lorazepam also have proven efficacy for PD.³

Benzodiazepines should be considered contraindicated in patients with a history of substance abuse, except in select cases.⁴ Benzodiazepines generally should be avoided in older patients because of increased risk for falls, cognitive impairment, and motor vehicle accidents. Table 2 lists situations in which benzodiazepines may be used to treat PD.

Table 2

Clinical scenarios in which to consider using benzodiazepines

TCAs are effective as monotherapy for PD. Most support comes from studies of imipramine or clomipramine.¹² Similar to SSRIs and venlafaxine XR, use a low initial dose and gradually increase until the patient remits or side effects prevent further increases. SSRI and TCA combinations rarely are used unless the TCA is a relatively specific norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (eg, desipramine, nortriptyline). Because TCAs are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 2D6 system and some SSRIs—particularly fluoxetine and paroxetine—strongly inhibit 2D6, combinations of TCAs with these agents may lead to dangerously high plasma TCA levels, placing patients at risk for cardiac dysrhythmias and other side effects.¹⁶

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)—particularly phenelzine—are underused for PD. They have the strongest efficacy data for any class of medications outside the first- and second-line agents and have a unique mechanism of action. In patients who can comply with the dietary and medication limitations, an MAOI generally should be the next step after nonresponse to other treatments.³

Alternative treatments

For patients who do not respond to any of the treatments described above, data from uncontrolled studies support mirtazapine, levetiracetam, and the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors duloxetine and milnacipran as monotherapy for PD.¹⁷ Pindolol—a beta blocker and 5-HT1A receptor antagonist—proved superior to placebo as an adjunctive agent to SSRIs in treatment-resistant PD in 1 of 2 trials.¹⁷ Minimal evidence supports the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine in treatment-resistant PD, although a placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine SR coadministered with SSRIs recently was completed (NCT00619892; results pending). Atypical antipsychotics are best reserved for patients with a primary psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder who experience panic attacks.⁵

Panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy, a 12-week (approximately 24 sessions) form of psychotherapy, has demonstrated superiority vs applied relaxation therapy.¹⁸ This treatment could be considered for patients who do not respond to standard first-line treatments, but few community therapists are familiar with this method.

For many patients with PD, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches are appealing. See this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com for a Box that discusses CAM for PD.

Box

Maintenance treatment

Patients who complete a course of CBT for PD often follow up with several “booster sessions” at monthly or longer intervals that focus on relapse prevention techniques. Few controlled trials have evaluated pharmacotherapy discontinuation in PD. Most guidelines recommend continuing treatment for ≥1 year after achieving remission to minimize the risk of relapse.³ Researchers are focusing on whether medication dosage can be reduced during maintenance without loss of efficacy.

Treatment discontinuation

In the absence of urgent medical need, taper medications for PD gradually over several months. PD patients are highly sensitive to unusual physical sensations, which can occur while discontinuing antidepressants or benzodiazepines. If a benzodiazepine is used in conjunction with an antidepressant, the benzodiazepine should be discontinued first, so that the antidepressant can help ease benzodiazepine-associated discontinuation symptoms. A brief course of CBT during pharmacotherapy discontinuation may increase the likelihood of successful tapering.¹⁹

CASE CONTINUED: A successful switch

Ms. K has to discontinue sequential trials of fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and venlafaxine XR, 225 mg/d because of side effects, and she does not reduce the frequency of her alprazolam use. She agrees to switch from alprazolam to clonazepam, 0.5 mg every morning and 1 mg at bedtime, and to start CBT. Clonazepam reduces her anxiety sufficiently so she can address her symptoms in therapy. Through CBT she becomes motivated to monitor her thoughts and treat them as guesses rather than facts, reviewing the evidence for her thoughts and generating rational responses. She participates in exposure exercises, which she practices between sessions, and grows to tolerate uncomfortable sensations until they no longer signal danger. After 12 CBT sessions, she is panic-free. Despite some trepidation, she agrees to a slow taper off clonazepam, reducing the dose by 0.25 mg every 2 weeks. She continues booster sessions with her therapist to manage any re-emerging anxiety. After an additional 12 weeks, she successfully discontinues clonazepam and remains panic-free.

Related Resources

• American Psychiatric Association. Panic disorder. http://healthyminds.org/Main-Topic/Panic-Disorder.aspx.
• Anxiety and Depression Association of America. Panic disorder & agoraphobia. http://adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/panic-disorder-agoraphobia.
• Mayo Clinic. Panic attacks and panic disorder. www.mayoclinic.com/health/panic-attacks/DS00338.
• National Health Service Self-Help Guides. www.ntw.nhs.uk/pic/selfhelp.
• National Institute of Mental Health. Panic disorder. www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/panic-disorder/index.shtml.

Drug Brand Names

• Alprazolam • Xanax
• Alprazolam XR • Xanax XR
• Citalopram • Celexa
• Clomipramine • Anafranil
• Clonazepam • Klonopin
• Desipramine • Norpramin
• Diazepam • Valium
• Duloxetine • Cymbalta
• Escitalopram • Lexapro
• Fluoxetine • Prozac
• Fluvoxamine • Luvox
• Imipramine • Tofranil
• Levetiracetam • Keppra
• Lorazepam • Ativan
• Milnacipran • Savella
• Mirtazapine • Remeron
• Nortriptyline • Aventyl, Pamelor
• Olanzapine • Zyprexa
• Paroxetine • Paxil
• Paroxetine CR • Paxil CR
• Phenelzine • Nardil
• Pindolol • Visken
• Quetiapine SR • Seroquel SR
• Risperidone • Risperdal
• Sertraline • Zoloft
• Venlafaxine XR • Effexor XR

Disclosures

Dr. Dunlop receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and the National Institute of Mental Health. He serves as a consultant to MedAvante and Roche.

Ms. Schneider and Dr. Gerardi report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Ms. K, a 24-year-old waitress who lives with her boyfriend, was referred by her primary care physician for evaluation of panic attacks that began “out of nowhere” at work approximately 6 months ago. The unpredictable attacks occur multiple times per week, causing her to leave work and cancel shifts.

Ms. K reports that before the panic attacks began, she felt happy in her relationship, enjoyed hobbies, and was hopeful about the future. However, she has become concerned that a potentially catastrophic illness is causing her panic attacks. She researches her symptoms on the Internet, and is preoccupied with the possibility of sudden death due to an undiagnosed heart condition. Multiple visits to the emergency room have not identified any physical abnormalities. Her primary care doctor prescribed alprazolam, 0.5 mg as needed for panic attacks, which she reports is helpful, “but only in the moment of the attacks.” Ms. K avoids alcohol and illicit substances and limits her caffeine intake. She is not willing to accept that her life “feels so limited.” Her dream of earning a nursing degree and eventually starting a family now seems unattainable.

Panic disorder (PD) occurs in 3% to 5% of adults, with women affected at roughly twice the rate of men.¹ Causing a broad range of distress and varying degrees of impairment, PD commonly occurs with other psychiatric disorders. For most patients, treatment is effective, but those who do not respond to initial approaches require a thoughtful, stepped approach to care. Key considerations include establishing an accurate diagnosis, clarifying comorbid illnesses, ascertaining patient beliefs and expectations, and providing appropriately dosed and maintained treatments.

Panic attacks vs PD

Panic attacks consist of rapid onset of intense anxiety, with prominent somatic symptoms, that peaks within 10 minutes (Figure).² Attacks in which <4 of the listed symptoms occur are considered limited-symptom panic attacks.

Figure: Body locations of panic attack symptoms
Diagnosis of a panic attack requires the sudden development of intense fear or discomfort characterized by ≥4 of the 13 symptoms listed above that peaks in intensity within 10 minutes of onset
Source: Reference 2

Panic attacks can occur with various disorders, including other anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and substance intoxication or withdrawal. Because serious medical conditions can present with panic-like symptoms, the initial occurrence of such symptoms warrants consideration of physiological causes. For a Box² that describes the differential diagnosis of panic attacks, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.

Box

A PD diagnosis requires that repeated panic attacks initially must occur from “out of the blue,” meaning no specific object or situation induced the attack. In addition, the diagnosis requires 1 of 3 types of psychological or behavioral changes as a result of the attacks (Table 1).² Agoraphobia is diagnosed if 1 of the behavioral changes is avoidance of places or situations from which escape might be embarrassing or difficult should an attack occur. A patient can be diagnosed as having PD with agoraphobia, PD without agoraphobia, or agoraphobia without PD (ie, experiences only limited symptom panic attacks, but avoids situations or stimuli associated with them).

Table 1

Definitions of panic disorder and agoraphobia

Comorbidities are common in patients with PD and predict greater difficulty achieving remission (Box).^1,3-6

Box

Treatment begins with education

The goal of treatment is remission of symptoms, ideally including an absence of panic attacks, agoraphobic avoidance, and anticipatory anxiety.¹ The Panic Disorder Severity Scale self-report is a validated measure of panic symptoms that may be useful in clinical practice.⁷

The first step in treatment is educating patients about panic attacks, framing them as an overreactive fear circuit in the brain that produces physical symptoms that are not dangerous. Using a brain model that shows the location of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex—which play crucial roles in generating and controlling anxiety and fear—can make this discussion more concrete.⁸ Although highly simplified, such models allow clinicians to demonstrate that excessive reactivity of limbic regions can be reduced by both top-down (cortico-limbic connections via cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT]) and bottom-up (pharmacotherapy directly acting on limbic structures) approaches. Such discussions lead to treatment recommendations for CBT, pharmacotherapy, or their combination.

No single treatment has emerged as the definitive “best” for PD, and no reliable predictors can guide specific treatment for an individual.³ Combining CBT with pharmacotherapy produces higher short-term response rates than either treatment alone, but in the long term, combination treatment does not appear to be superior to CBT alone.⁹ Base the initial treatment selection for PD on patient preference, treatment availability and cost, and comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions. For an Algorithm to guide treatment decisions, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.

Algorithm: Treatment for panic disorder: A suggested algorithm
^aPoor response to an SSRI should lead to a switch to venlafaxine extended-release, and vice versa
^bBenzodiazepines are relatively contraindicated in geriatric patients and patients with a history of substance abuse or dependence
CBT: cognitive-behavioral therapy; MAOI: monoamine oxidase inhibitor; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA: tricyclic antidepressant; Ven XR: venlafaxine extended-release

First-line treatments

Psychotherapy. CBT is the most efficacious psychotherapy for PD. Twelve to 15 sessions of CBT has demonstrated efficacy for PD, with additional effects on comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms.¹⁰ No large clinical trials of CBT have used cognitive restructuring alone; all have included at least some component of exposure that requires the patient to confront feared physical sensations. Gains during treatment may be steady and gradual or sudden and uneven, with rapid improvement in some but not all symptoms. CBT and pharmacotherapy have demonstrated similar levels of benefit in short-term trials, but CBT has proven superior in most⁹ but not all¹¹ trials evaluating long-term outcomes, particularly compared with pharmacotherapy that is discontinued during follow-up. Although less studied, group CBT also may be considered if a patient cannot afford individual CBT.

Pharmacotherapy. Evidence supports selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), venlafaxine extended-release (XR), benzodiazepines, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) as effective treatments for PD.³ No class of medication has demonstrated superiority over others in short-term treatment.^3,12 Because of the medical risks associated with benzodiazepines and TCAs, an SSRI or venlafaxine XR should be the first medication option for most patients. Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine XR are FDA-approved for PD. Paroxetine is associated with weight gain and may increase the risk for panic recurrence upon discontinuation more than sertraline, making it a less favorable option for many patients.¹³ Start doses at half the normal starting dose used for treating major depressive disorder and continue for 4 to 7 days, then increase to the minimal effective dose. For a Table³ that lists dosing recommendations for antidepressants to treat PD, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com. If there is no improvement by 4 weeks, increase the dose every 2 to 4 weeks until remission is achieved or side effects prevent further dose increases.

Table

Recommended doses for antidepressants used to treat panic disorder

Treatment nonresponse. True non-response needs to be distinguished from poor response caused by inadequate treatment delivery, eg, patients not completing homework assignments in CBT or not adhering to pharmacotherapy. Asking patients about adverse effects or personal and family beliefs about treatment may reveal reasons for nonadherence.

Second-line treatments

Little data are available to guide next-step treatment options in patients who don’t achieve remission from their initial treatment. Patients who benefit from an SSRI, venlafaxine XR, or CBT but still have symptoms should be started on combination treatment. For a patient who experiences complete non-response to the initial treatment, discontinue the first treatment and switch to the other modality. In general, completely ineffective treatments should be discontinued when another treatment is added, but when partial improvement (>30%) occurs, continue the original treatment and augment it with another approach.

For patients pursuing pharmacotherapy, poor response to an adequate SSRI trial usually should lead to a switch to venlafaxine XR, and vice versa. Failure to respond to both of these medication classes should prompt a switch to a benzodiazepine or TCA.

Benzodiazepines are a fast-acting, effective treatment for PD, with efficacy similar to SSRIs in acute and long-term treatment.¹⁴ Benzodiazepines may be prescribed with antidepressants at the beginning of treatment to improve response speed.¹⁵ Clonazepam and alprazolam are FDA-approved for treating PD. A high-potency, long-acting agent, clonazepam is the preferred initial benzodiazepine, dosed 0.5 to 4 mg/d on a fixed schedule. Although substantial data support using alprazolam for PD, it requires more frequent dosing and has a greater risk of rebound anxiety and abuse potential because of its more rapid onset of action. Compared with immediate-release alprazolam, alprazolam XR has a slower absorption rate and longer steady state in the blood, but this formulation does not have lower abuse potential or greater efficacy. Although not FDA-approved for PD, diazepam and lorazepam also have proven efficacy for PD.³

Benzodiazepines should be considered contraindicated in patients with a history of substance abuse, except in select cases.⁴ Benzodiazepines generally should be avoided in older patients because of increased risk for falls, cognitive impairment, and motor vehicle accidents. Table 2 lists situations in which benzodiazepines may be used to treat PD.

Table 2

Clinical scenarios in which to consider using benzodiazepines

TCAs are effective as monotherapy for PD. Most support comes from studies of imipramine or clomipramine.¹² Similar to SSRIs and venlafaxine XR, use a low initial dose and gradually increase until the patient remits or side effects prevent further increases. SSRI and TCA combinations rarely are used unless the TCA is a relatively specific norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (eg, desipramine, nortriptyline). Because TCAs are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 2D6 system and some SSRIs—particularly fluoxetine and paroxetine—strongly inhibit 2D6, combinations of TCAs with these agents may lead to dangerously high plasma TCA levels, placing patients at risk for cardiac dysrhythmias and other side effects.¹⁶

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)—particularly phenelzine—are underused for PD. They have the strongest efficacy data for any class of medications outside the first- and second-line agents and have a unique mechanism of action. In patients who can comply with the dietary and medication limitations, an MAOI generally should be the next step after nonresponse to other treatments.³

Alternative treatments

For patients who do not respond to any of the treatments described above, data from uncontrolled studies support mirtazapine, levetiracetam, and the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors duloxetine and milnacipran as monotherapy for PD.¹⁷ Pindolol—a beta blocker and 5-HT1A receptor antagonist—proved superior to placebo as an adjunctive agent to SSRIs in treatment-resistant PD in 1 of 2 trials.¹⁷ Minimal evidence supports the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine in treatment-resistant PD, although a placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine SR coadministered with SSRIs recently was completed (NCT00619892; results pending). Atypical antipsychotics are best reserved for patients with a primary psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder who experience panic attacks.⁵

Panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy, a 12-week (approximately 24 sessions) form of psychotherapy, has demonstrated superiority vs applied relaxation therapy.¹⁸ This treatment could be considered for patients who do not respond to standard first-line treatments, but few community therapists are familiar with this method.

For many patients with PD, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches are appealing. See this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com for a Box that discusses CAM for PD.

Box

Maintenance treatment

Patients who complete a course of CBT for PD often follow up with several “booster sessions” at monthly or longer intervals that focus on relapse prevention techniques. Few controlled trials have evaluated pharmacotherapy discontinuation in PD. Most guidelines recommend continuing treatment for ≥1 year after achieving remission to minimize the risk of relapse.³ Researchers are focusing on whether medication dosage can be reduced during maintenance without loss of efficacy.

Treatment discontinuation

In the absence of urgent medical need, taper medications for PD gradually over several months. PD patients are highly sensitive to unusual physical sensations, which can occur while discontinuing antidepressants or benzodiazepines. If a benzodiazepine is used in conjunction with an antidepressant, the benzodiazepine should be discontinued first, so that the antidepressant can help ease benzodiazepine-associated discontinuation symptoms. A brief course of CBT during pharmacotherapy discontinuation may increase the likelihood of successful tapering.¹⁹

CASE CONTINUED: A successful switch

Ms. K has to discontinue sequential trials of fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and venlafaxine XR, 225 mg/d because of side effects, and she does not reduce the frequency of her alprazolam use. She agrees to switch from alprazolam to clonazepam, 0.5 mg every morning and 1 mg at bedtime, and to start CBT. Clonazepam reduces her anxiety sufficiently so she can address her symptoms in therapy. Through CBT she becomes motivated to monitor her thoughts and treat them as guesses rather than facts, reviewing the evidence for her thoughts and generating rational responses. She participates in exposure exercises, which she practices between sessions, and grows to tolerate uncomfortable sensations until they no longer signal danger. After 12 CBT sessions, she is panic-free. Despite some trepidation, she agrees to a slow taper off clonazepam, reducing the dose by 0.25 mg every 2 weeks. She continues booster sessions with her therapist to manage any re-emerging anxiety. After an additional 12 weeks, she successfully discontinues clonazepam and remains panic-free.

Related Resources

• American Psychiatric Association. Panic disorder. http://healthyminds.org/Main-Topic/Panic-Disorder.aspx.
• Anxiety and Depression Association of America. Panic disorder & agoraphobia. http://adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/panic-disorder-agoraphobia.
• Mayo Clinic. Panic attacks and panic disorder. www.mayoclinic.com/health/panic-attacks/DS00338.
• National Health Service Self-Help Guides. www.ntw.nhs.uk/pic/selfhelp.
• National Institute of Mental Health. Panic disorder. www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/panic-disorder/index.shtml.

Drug Brand Names

• Alprazolam • Xanax
• Alprazolam XR • Xanax XR
• Citalopram • Celexa
• Clomipramine • Anafranil
• Clonazepam • Klonopin
• Desipramine • Norpramin
• Diazepam • Valium
• Duloxetine • Cymbalta
• Escitalopram • Lexapro
• Fluoxetine • Prozac
• Fluvoxamine • Luvox
• Imipramine • Tofranil
• Levetiracetam • Keppra
• Lorazepam • Ativan
• Milnacipran • Savella
• Mirtazapine • Remeron
• Nortriptyline • Aventyl, Pamelor
• Olanzapine • Zyprexa
• Paroxetine • Paxil
• Paroxetine CR • Paxil CR
• Phenelzine • Nardil
• Pindolol • Visken
• Quetiapine SR • Seroquel SR
• Risperidone • Risperdal
• Sertraline • Zoloft
• Venlafaxine XR • Effexor XR

Disclosures

Dr. Dunlop receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and the National Institute of Mental Health. He serves as a consultant to MedAvante and Roche.

Ms. Schneider and Dr. Gerardi report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Ms. K, a 24-year-old waitress who lives with her boyfriend, was referred by her primary care physician for evaluation of panic attacks that began “out of nowhere” at work approximately 6 months ago. The unpredictable attacks occur multiple times per week, causing her to leave work and cancel shifts.

Ms. K reports that before the panic attacks began, she felt happy in her relationship, enjoyed hobbies, and was hopeful about the future. However, she has become concerned that a potentially catastrophic illness is causing her panic attacks. She researches her symptoms on the Internet, and is preoccupied with the possibility of sudden death due to an undiagnosed heart condition. Multiple visits to the emergency room have not identified any physical abnormalities. Her primary care doctor prescribed alprazolam, 0.5 mg as needed for panic attacks, which she reports is helpful, “but only in the moment of the attacks.” Ms. K avoids alcohol and illicit substances and limits her caffeine intake. She is not willing to accept that her life “feels so limited.” Her dream of earning a nursing degree and eventually starting a family now seems unattainable.

Panic disorder (PD) occurs in 3% to 5% of adults, with women affected at roughly twice the rate of men.¹ Causing a broad range of distress and varying degrees of impairment, PD commonly occurs with other psychiatric disorders. For most patients, treatment is effective, but those who do not respond to initial approaches require a thoughtful, stepped approach to care. Key considerations include establishing an accurate diagnosis, clarifying comorbid illnesses, ascertaining patient beliefs and expectations, and providing appropriately dosed and maintained treatments.

Panic attacks vs PD

Panic attacks consist of rapid onset of intense anxiety, with prominent somatic symptoms, that peaks within 10 minutes (Figure).² Attacks in which <4 of the listed symptoms occur are considered limited-symptom panic attacks.

Figure: Body locations of panic attack symptoms
Diagnosis of a panic attack requires the sudden development of intense fear or discomfort characterized by ≥4 of the 13 symptoms listed above that peaks in intensity within 10 minutes of onset
Source: Reference 2

Panic attacks can occur with various disorders, including other anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and substance intoxication or withdrawal. Because serious medical conditions can present with panic-like symptoms, the initial occurrence of such symptoms warrants consideration of physiological causes. For a Box² that describes the differential diagnosis of panic attacks, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.

Box

A PD diagnosis requires that repeated panic attacks initially must occur from “out of the blue,” meaning no specific object or situation induced the attack. In addition, the diagnosis requires 1 of 3 types of psychological or behavioral changes as a result of the attacks (Table 1).² Agoraphobia is diagnosed if 1 of the behavioral changes is avoidance of places or situations from which escape might be embarrassing or difficult should an attack occur. A patient can be diagnosed as having PD with agoraphobia, PD without agoraphobia, or agoraphobia without PD (ie, experiences only limited symptom panic attacks, but avoids situations or stimuli associated with them).

Table 1

Definitions of panic disorder and agoraphobia

Comorbidities are common in patients with PD and predict greater difficulty achieving remission (Box).^1,3-6

Box

Treatment begins with education

The goal of treatment is remission of symptoms, ideally including an absence of panic attacks, agoraphobic avoidance, and anticipatory anxiety.¹ The Panic Disorder Severity Scale self-report is a validated measure of panic symptoms that may be useful in clinical practice.⁷

The first step in treatment is educating patients about panic attacks, framing them as an overreactive fear circuit in the brain that produces physical symptoms that are not dangerous. Using a brain model that shows the location of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex—which play crucial roles in generating and controlling anxiety and fear—can make this discussion more concrete.⁸ Although highly simplified, such models allow clinicians to demonstrate that excessive reactivity of limbic regions can be reduced by both top-down (cortico-limbic connections via cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT]) and bottom-up (pharmacotherapy directly acting on limbic structures) approaches. Such discussions lead to treatment recommendations for CBT, pharmacotherapy, or their combination.

No single treatment has emerged as the definitive “best” for PD, and no reliable predictors can guide specific treatment for an individual.³ Combining CBT with pharmacotherapy produces higher short-term response rates than either treatment alone, but in the long term, combination treatment does not appear to be superior to CBT alone.⁹ Base the initial treatment selection for PD on patient preference, treatment availability and cost, and comorbid medical and psychiatric conditions. For an Algorithm to guide treatment decisions, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com.

Algorithm: Treatment for panic disorder: A suggested algorithm
^aPoor response to an SSRI should lead to a switch to venlafaxine extended-release, and vice versa
^bBenzodiazepines are relatively contraindicated in geriatric patients and patients with a history of substance abuse or dependence
CBT: cognitive-behavioral therapy; MAOI: monoamine oxidase inhibitor; SSRI: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA: tricyclic antidepressant; Ven XR: venlafaxine extended-release

First-line treatments

Psychotherapy. CBT is the most efficacious psychotherapy for PD. Twelve to 15 sessions of CBT has demonstrated efficacy for PD, with additional effects on comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms.¹⁰ No large clinical trials of CBT have used cognitive restructuring alone; all have included at least some component of exposure that requires the patient to confront feared physical sensations. Gains during treatment may be steady and gradual or sudden and uneven, with rapid improvement in some but not all symptoms. CBT and pharmacotherapy have demonstrated similar levels of benefit in short-term trials, but CBT has proven superior in most⁹ but not all¹¹ trials evaluating long-term outcomes, particularly compared with pharmacotherapy that is discontinued during follow-up. Although less studied, group CBT also may be considered if a patient cannot afford individual CBT.

Pharmacotherapy. Evidence supports selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), venlafaxine extended-release (XR), benzodiazepines, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) as effective treatments for PD.³ No class of medication has demonstrated superiority over others in short-term treatment.^3,12 Because of the medical risks associated with benzodiazepines and TCAs, an SSRI or venlafaxine XR should be the first medication option for most patients. Fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine XR are FDA-approved for PD. Paroxetine is associated with weight gain and may increase the risk for panic recurrence upon discontinuation more than sertraline, making it a less favorable option for many patients.¹³ Start doses at half the normal starting dose used for treating major depressive disorder and continue for 4 to 7 days, then increase to the minimal effective dose. For a Table³ that lists dosing recommendations for antidepressants to treat PD, see this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com. If there is no improvement by 4 weeks, increase the dose every 2 to 4 weeks until remission is achieved or side effects prevent further dose increases.

Table

Recommended doses for antidepressants used to treat panic disorder

Treatment nonresponse. True non-response needs to be distinguished from poor response caused by inadequate treatment delivery, eg, patients not completing homework assignments in CBT or not adhering to pharmacotherapy. Asking patients about adverse effects or personal and family beliefs about treatment may reveal reasons for nonadherence.

Second-line treatments

Little data are available to guide next-step treatment options in patients who don’t achieve remission from their initial treatment. Patients who benefit from an SSRI, venlafaxine XR, or CBT but still have symptoms should be started on combination treatment. For a patient who experiences complete non-response to the initial treatment, discontinue the first treatment and switch to the other modality. In general, completely ineffective treatments should be discontinued when another treatment is added, but when partial improvement (>30%) occurs, continue the original treatment and augment it with another approach.

For patients pursuing pharmacotherapy, poor response to an adequate SSRI trial usually should lead to a switch to venlafaxine XR, and vice versa. Failure to respond to both of these medication classes should prompt a switch to a benzodiazepine or TCA.

Benzodiazepines are a fast-acting, effective treatment for PD, with efficacy similar to SSRIs in acute and long-term treatment.¹⁴ Benzodiazepines may be prescribed with antidepressants at the beginning of treatment to improve response speed.¹⁵ Clonazepam and alprazolam are FDA-approved for treating PD. A high-potency, long-acting agent, clonazepam is the preferred initial benzodiazepine, dosed 0.5 to 4 mg/d on a fixed schedule. Although substantial data support using alprazolam for PD, it requires more frequent dosing and has a greater risk of rebound anxiety and abuse potential because of its more rapid onset of action. Compared with immediate-release alprazolam, alprazolam XR has a slower absorption rate and longer steady state in the blood, but this formulation does not have lower abuse potential or greater efficacy. Although not FDA-approved for PD, diazepam and lorazepam also have proven efficacy for PD.³

Benzodiazepines should be considered contraindicated in patients with a history of substance abuse, except in select cases.⁴ Benzodiazepines generally should be avoided in older patients because of increased risk for falls, cognitive impairment, and motor vehicle accidents. Table 2 lists situations in which benzodiazepines may be used to treat PD.

Table 2

Clinical scenarios in which to consider using benzodiazepines

TCAs are effective as monotherapy for PD. Most support comes from studies of imipramine or clomipramine.¹² Similar to SSRIs and venlafaxine XR, use a low initial dose and gradually increase until the patient remits or side effects prevent further increases. SSRI and TCA combinations rarely are used unless the TCA is a relatively specific norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (eg, desipramine, nortriptyline). Because TCAs are metabolized via the cytochrome P450 2D6 system and some SSRIs—particularly fluoxetine and paroxetine—strongly inhibit 2D6, combinations of TCAs with these agents may lead to dangerously high plasma TCA levels, placing patients at risk for cardiac dysrhythmias and other side effects.¹⁶

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)—particularly phenelzine—are underused for PD. They have the strongest efficacy data for any class of medications outside the first- and second-line agents and have a unique mechanism of action. In patients who can comply with the dietary and medication limitations, an MAOI generally should be the next step after nonresponse to other treatments.³

Alternative treatments

For patients who do not respond to any of the treatments described above, data from uncontrolled studies support mirtazapine, levetiracetam, and the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors duloxetine and milnacipran as monotherapy for PD.¹⁷ Pindolol—a beta blocker and 5-HT1A receptor antagonist—proved superior to placebo as an adjunctive agent to SSRIs in treatment-resistant PD in 1 of 2 trials.¹⁷ Minimal evidence supports the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and olanzapine in treatment-resistant PD, although a placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine SR coadministered with SSRIs recently was completed (NCT00619892; results pending). Atypical antipsychotics are best reserved for patients with a primary psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder who experience panic attacks.⁵

Panic-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy, a 12-week (approximately 24 sessions) form of psychotherapy, has demonstrated superiority vs applied relaxation therapy.¹⁸ This treatment could be considered for patients who do not respond to standard first-line treatments, but few community therapists are familiar with this method.

For many patients with PD, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) approaches are appealing. See this article at CurrentPsychiatry.com for a Box that discusses CAM for PD.

Box

Maintenance treatment

Patients who complete a course of CBT for PD often follow up with several “booster sessions” at monthly or longer intervals that focus on relapse prevention techniques. Few controlled trials have evaluated pharmacotherapy discontinuation in PD. Most guidelines recommend continuing treatment for ≥1 year after achieving remission to minimize the risk of relapse.³ Researchers are focusing on whether medication dosage can be reduced during maintenance without loss of efficacy.

Treatment discontinuation

In the absence of urgent medical need, taper medications for PD gradually over several months. PD patients are highly sensitive to unusual physical sensations, which can occur while discontinuing antidepressants or benzodiazepines. If a benzodiazepine is used in conjunction with an antidepressant, the benzodiazepine should be discontinued first, so that the antidepressant can help ease benzodiazepine-associated discontinuation symptoms. A brief course of CBT during pharmacotherapy discontinuation may increase the likelihood of successful tapering.¹⁹

CASE CONTINUED: A successful switch

Ms. K has to discontinue sequential trials of fluoxetine, 40 mg/d, and venlafaxine XR, 225 mg/d because of side effects, and she does not reduce the frequency of her alprazolam use. She agrees to switch from alprazolam to clonazepam, 0.5 mg every morning and 1 mg at bedtime, and to start CBT. Clonazepam reduces her anxiety sufficiently so she can address her symptoms in therapy. Through CBT she becomes motivated to monitor her thoughts and treat them as guesses rather than facts, reviewing the evidence for her thoughts and generating rational responses. She participates in exposure exercises, which she practices between sessions, and grows to tolerate uncomfortable sensations until they no longer signal danger. After 12 CBT sessions, she is panic-free. Despite some trepidation, she agrees to a slow taper off clonazepam, reducing the dose by 0.25 mg every 2 weeks. She continues booster sessions with her therapist to manage any re-emerging anxiety. After an additional 12 weeks, she successfully discontinues clonazepam and remains panic-free.

Related Resources

• American Psychiatric Association. Panic disorder. http://healthyminds.org/Main-Topic/Panic-Disorder.aspx.
• Anxiety and Depression Association of America. Panic disorder & agoraphobia. http://adaa.org/understanding-anxiety/panic-disorder-agoraphobia.
• Mayo Clinic. Panic attacks and panic disorder. www.mayoclinic.com/health/panic-attacks/DS00338.
• National Health Service Self-Help Guides. www.ntw.nhs.uk/pic/selfhelp.
• National Institute of Mental Health. Panic disorder. www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/panic-disorder/index.shtml.

Drug Brand Names

• Alprazolam • Xanax
• Alprazolam XR • Xanax XR
• Citalopram • Celexa
• Clomipramine • Anafranil
• Clonazepam • Klonopin
• Desipramine • Norpramin
• Diazepam • Valium
• Duloxetine • Cymbalta
• Escitalopram • Lexapro
• Fluoxetine • Prozac
• Fluvoxamine • Luvox
• Imipramine • Tofranil
• Levetiracetam • Keppra
• Lorazepam • Ativan
• Milnacipran • Savella
• Mirtazapine • Remeron
• Nortriptyline • Aventyl, Pamelor
• Olanzapine • Zyprexa
• Paroxetine • Paxil
• Paroxetine CR • Paxil CR
• Phenelzine • Nardil
• Pindolol • Visken
• Quetiapine SR • Seroquel SR
• Risperidone • Risperdal
• Sertraline • Zoloft
• Venlafaxine XR • Effexor XR

Disclosures

Dr. Dunlop receives research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and the National Institute of Mental Health. He serves as a consultant to MedAvante and Roche.

Ms. Schneider and Dr. Gerardi report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Discuss this article at www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are the first and second most common causes of neurodegenerative dementia, respectively.^{“New Alzheimer’s disease guidelines: Implications for clinicians,” Current Psychiatry, March 2012, p. 15-20; http://bit.ly/UNYikk.}

The 2005 report of the DLB Consortium⁵ recognizes central, core, suggestive, and supportive features of DLB (Table 1).^5,10 These features are considered in the context of other confounding clinical conditions and the timing of cognitive and motor symptoms. The revised DLB criteria⁵ require a central feature of progressive cognitive decline. “Probable DLB” is when a patient presents with 2 core features or 1 core feature and ≥1 suggestive features. A diagnosis of “possible DLB” requires 1 core feature or 1 suggestive feature in the presence of progressive cognitive decline.

Table 1

Diagnostic criteria for AD and DLB

Biomarkers for AD, but not DLB

The 2011 diagnostic criteria for AD incorporate biomarkers that can be measured in vivo and reflect speci?c features of disease-related pathophysiologic processes. Biomarkers for AD are divided into 2 categories:¹¹

• amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation: abnormal tracer retention on amyloid positron emission topography (PET) imaging and low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42
• neuronal degeneration or injury: elevated CSF tau (total and phosphorylated tau), decreased ?uorodeoxyglucose uptake on PET in temporo-parietal cortices, and atrophy on structural MRI in the hippocampal and temporo-parietal regions.

No clinically applicable genotypic or CSF markers exist to support a DLB diagnosis, but there are many promising candidates, including elevated levels of CSF p-tau 181, CSF levels of alpha- and beta-synuclein,¹² and CSF beta-glucocerebrosidase levels.¹³ PET mapping of brain acetylcholinesterase activity,¹⁴ 123I-2β-carbomethoxy-3β- (4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl)nortropane single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) dopamine transporter (DaT) imaging¹⁵ and metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy also are promising methods. DaT scan SPECT is FDA-approved for detecting loss of functional dopaminergic neuron terminals in the striatum and can differentiate between AD and DLB with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% to 88% and 94% to 100%, respectively.¹⁶ This test is covered by Medicare for differentiating AD and DLB.

Differences in presentation

Cognitive impairment. Contrary to the early memory impairment that characterizes AD, memory deficits in DLB usually appear later in the disease course.⁵ Patients with DLB manifest greater attentional, visuospatial, and executive impairments than those with AD, whereas AD causes more profound episodic (declarative) memory impairment than DLB. DLB patients show more preserved consolidation and storage of verbal information than AD patients because of less neuroanatomical and cholinergic compromise in the medial temporal lobe. There is no evidence of significant differences in remote memory, semantic memory, and language (naming and fluency).

Compromised attention in DLB may be the basis for fluctuating cognition, a characteristic of the disease. The greater attentional impairment and reaction time variability in DLB compared with AD is evident during complex tasks for attention and may be a function of the executive and visuospatial demands of the tasks.¹⁷

Executive functions critical to adaptive, goal-directed behavior are more impaired in DLB than AD. DLB patients are more susceptible to distraction and have difficulty engaging in a task and shifting from 1 task to another. This, together with a tendency for confabulation and perseveration, are signs of executive dysfunction.

Neuropsychiatric features. DLB patients are more likely than AD patients to exhibit psychiatric symptoms and have more functional impairment.¹⁸ In an analysis of autopsy-confirmed cases, hallucinations and delusions were more frequent with Lewy body pathology (75%) than AD (21%) at initial clinical evaluation.¹⁸ By the end stages of both illnesses, the degree of psychotic symptoms is comparable.¹⁹ Depression is common in DLB; whether base rates of depressed mood and major depression differ between DLB and AD is uncertain.²⁰

Psychosis in AD can be induced by medication or delirium, or triggered by poor sensory perceptions. Psychotic symptoms occur more frequently during the moderate and advanced stages of AD, when patients present with visual hallucinations, delusions, or delusional misidentifications. As many as 10% to 20% of patients with AD experience hallucinations, typically visual. Delusions occur in 30% to 50% of AD patients, usually in the later stages of the disease. The most common delusional themes are infidelity, theft, and paranoia. Female sex is a risk factor for psychosis in AD. Delusions co-occur with aggression, anxiety, and aberrant motor behavior.

Visual hallucinations—mostly vivid, well-formed, false perceptions of insects, animals, or people—are the defining feature of DLB.²¹ Many patients recognize that they are experiencing visual hallucinations and can ignore them. DLB patients also may experience visual illusions, such as misperceiving household objects as living beings. Delusions—typically paranoid—are common among DLB patients, as are depression and anxiety.¹ Agitation or aggressive behavior tends to occur late in the illness, if at all.

The causes of psychotic symptoms in DLB are not fully understood, but dopamine dysfunction likely is involved in hallucinations, delusions, and agitation, and serotonin dysfunction may be associated with depression and anxiety. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep/wakefulness dysregulation, in which the dream imagery of REM sleep may occur during wakefulness, also has been proposed as a mechanism for visual hallucinations in DLB.²² In DLB, psychotic symptoms occur early and are a hallmark of this illness, whereas in AD they usually occur in the middle to late stages of the disease.

Motor symptoms. In AD, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) are common later in the disease, are strongly correlated with disease severity, and are a strong, independent predictor of depression severity.²³ EPS are more common in DLB than in AD²⁴ and DLB patients are at higher risk of developing EPS even with low doses of typical antipsychotics, compared with AD patients.²⁵

Other symptoms. REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is characterized by enacting dreams—often violent—during REM sleep. RBD is common in DLB and many patients also have excessive daytime somnolence. Other sleep disorders in DLB include insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, and periodic limb movements during sleep.

In AD patients, common sleep behaviors include confusion in the early evening (“sundowning”) and frequent nighttime awakenings, often accompanied by wandering.²⁶ Orthostatic hypotension, impotence, urinary incontinence, and constipation are common in DLB. Lack of insight concerning personal cognitive, mood, and behavioral state is highly prevalent in AD patients and more common than in DLB.

Diagnostic evaluation

Because there are no definitive clinical markers for DLB, diagnosis is based on a detailed clinical and family history from the patient and a reliable informant, as well as a physical, neurologic, and mental status examination that looks for associated noncognitive symptoms, and neuropsychological evaluation. Reasons DLB may be misdiagnosed include:

• Some “core” clinical features of DLB may not appear or may overlap with AD.
• Presence and severity of concurrent AD pathology in DLB may modify the clinical presentation, with decreased rates of hallucinations and parkinsonism and increased neurofibrillary tangles.
• Failure to reliably identify fluctuations—variations in cognition and arousal, such as periods of unresponsiveness while awake (“zoning out”), excessive daytime somnolence, and disorganized speech.²⁷

Detecting and characterizing cognitive deficits in dementia patients using neuropsychological testing is important in establishing a clinical diagnosis, determining baseline levels of impairment, forming a prognosis, and initiating disease-specific treatments. Differences in neuropsychological findings in AD and DLB are outlined in Table 2.^16,28-33 Several studies have suggested using these measures to differentiate patients with DLB from those with AD.²⁰

Table 2

Diagnostic testing for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies

Evidence is insufficient to support using electroencephalographic and polysomnographic studies when initially evaluating patients with dementia. Brain CT or MRI are recommended as part of the initial evaluation of dementia patients to exclude treatable causes of dementia and help clarify the differential diagnosis. Occipital hypometabolism and hypoperfusion demonstrated on PET and SPECT imaging have high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating AD from DLB.

To diagnose DLB more consistently, look for core features of the disease, RBD, antipsychotic hypersensitivity, and decreased striatal binding at presynaptic DaT sites.¹⁵ Abnormal (low binding) DaT activity is the most reliable diagnostic marker for DLB.³⁴ Myocardial scintigraphy with MIBG is sensitive to pathologic changes of DLB before clinical expression and could overcome the difficulties of using clinical criteria alone to identify patients with DLB.³⁵ MIBG scintigraphy may be preferred to DaT scan because it is less expensive and its sensitivity and specificity to DLB are independent of the presence of parkinsonism.³⁵

For an overview of pharmacotherapy options for patients with AD or DLB, see Box 2.

Box 2

Related Resources

• Hanyu H, Sato T, Hirao K, et al. Differences in clinical course between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(2):212-217.
• Walker Z, McKeith I, Rodda J, et al. Comparison of cognitive decline between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000380.

Drug Brand Names

• Aripiprazole • Abilify
• Clonazepam • Klonopin
• Donepezil • Aricept
• Galantamine • Razadyne, Reminyl
• Levodopa • Dopar, Larodopa
• Memantine • Namenda
• Quetiapine • Seroquel
• Rivastigmine • Exelon

Disclosure

Drs. Bishnoi and Manepalli report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Dr. Grossberg serves as a consultant to Forest, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. His department receives research funding from Novartis, Janssen, and Pfizer.

Discuss this article at www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are the first and second most common causes of neurodegenerative dementia, respectively.^{“New Alzheimer’s disease guidelines: Implications for clinicians,” Current Psychiatry, March 2012, p. 15-20; http://bit.ly/UNYikk.}

The 2005 report of the DLB Consortium⁵ recognizes central, core, suggestive, and supportive features of DLB (Table 1).^5,10 These features are considered in the context of other confounding clinical conditions and the timing of cognitive and motor symptoms. The revised DLB criteria⁵ require a central feature of progressive cognitive decline. “Probable DLB” is when a patient presents with 2 core features or 1 core feature and ≥1 suggestive features. A diagnosis of “possible DLB” requires 1 core feature or 1 suggestive feature in the presence of progressive cognitive decline.

Table 1

Diagnostic criteria for AD and DLB

Biomarkers for AD, but not DLB

The 2011 diagnostic criteria for AD incorporate biomarkers that can be measured in vivo and reflect speci?c features of disease-related pathophysiologic processes. Biomarkers for AD are divided into 2 categories:¹¹

• amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation: abnormal tracer retention on amyloid positron emission topography (PET) imaging and low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42
• neuronal degeneration or injury: elevated CSF tau (total and phosphorylated tau), decreased ?uorodeoxyglucose uptake on PET in temporo-parietal cortices, and atrophy on structural MRI in the hippocampal and temporo-parietal regions.

No clinically applicable genotypic or CSF markers exist to support a DLB diagnosis, but there are many promising candidates, including elevated levels of CSF p-tau 181, CSF levels of alpha- and beta-synuclein,¹² and CSF beta-glucocerebrosidase levels.¹³ PET mapping of brain acetylcholinesterase activity,¹⁴ 123I-2β-carbomethoxy-3β- (4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl)nortropane single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) dopamine transporter (DaT) imaging¹⁵ and metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy also are promising methods. DaT scan SPECT is FDA-approved for detecting loss of functional dopaminergic neuron terminals in the striatum and can differentiate between AD and DLB with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% to 88% and 94% to 100%, respectively.¹⁶ This test is covered by Medicare for differentiating AD and DLB.

Differences in presentation

Cognitive impairment. Contrary to the early memory impairment that characterizes AD, memory deficits in DLB usually appear later in the disease course.⁵ Patients with DLB manifest greater attentional, visuospatial, and executive impairments than those with AD, whereas AD causes more profound episodic (declarative) memory impairment than DLB. DLB patients show more preserved consolidation and storage of verbal information than AD patients because of less neuroanatomical and cholinergic compromise in the medial temporal lobe. There is no evidence of significant differences in remote memory, semantic memory, and language (naming and fluency).

Compromised attention in DLB may be the basis for fluctuating cognition, a characteristic of the disease. The greater attentional impairment and reaction time variability in DLB compared with AD is evident during complex tasks for attention and may be a function of the executive and visuospatial demands of the tasks.¹⁷

Executive functions critical to adaptive, goal-directed behavior are more impaired in DLB than AD. DLB patients are more susceptible to distraction and have difficulty engaging in a task and shifting from 1 task to another. This, together with a tendency for confabulation and perseveration, are signs of executive dysfunction.

Neuropsychiatric features. DLB patients are more likely than AD patients to exhibit psychiatric symptoms and have more functional impairment.¹⁸ In an analysis of autopsy-confirmed cases, hallucinations and delusions were more frequent with Lewy body pathology (75%) than AD (21%) at initial clinical evaluation.¹⁸ By the end stages of both illnesses, the degree of psychotic symptoms is comparable.¹⁹ Depression is common in DLB; whether base rates of depressed mood and major depression differ between DLB and AD is uncertain.²⁰

Psychosis in AD can be induced by medication or delirium, or triggered by poor sensory perceptions. Psychotic symptoms occur more frequently during the moderate and advanced stages of AD, when patients present with visual hallucinations, delusions, or delusional misidentifications. As many as 10% to 20% of patients with AD experience hallucinations, typically visual. Delusions occur in 30% to 50% of AD patients, usually in the later stages of the disease. The most common delusional themes are infidelity, theft, and paranoia. Female sex is a risk factor for psychosis in AD. Delusions co-occur with aggression, anxiety, and aberrant motor behavior.

Visual hallucinations—mostly vivid, well-formed, false perceptions of insects, animals, or people—are the defining feature of DLB.²¹ Many patients recognize that they are experiencing visual hallucinations and can ignore them. DLB patients also may experience visual illusions, such as misperceiving household objects as living beings. Delusions—typically paranoid—are common among DLB patients, as are depression and anxiety.¹ Agitation or aggressive behavior tends to occur late in the illness, if at all.

The causes of psychotic symptoms in DLB are not fully understood, but dopamine dysfunction likely is involved in hallucinations, delusions, and agitation, and serotonin dysfunction may be associated with depression and anxiety. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep/wakefulness dysregulation, in which the dream imagery of REM sleep may occur during wakefulness, also has been proposed as a mechanism for visual hallucinations in DLB.²² In DLB, psychotic symptoms occur early and are a hallmark of this illness, whereas in AD they usually occur in the middle to late stages of the disease.

Motor symptoms. In AD, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) are common later in the disease, are strongly correlated with disease severity, and are a strong, independent predictor of depression severity.²³ EPS are more common in DLB than in AD²⁴ and DLB patients are at higher risk of developing EPS even with low doses of typical antipsychotics, compared with AD patients.²⁵

Other symptoms. REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is characterized by enacting dreams—often violent—during REM sleep. RBD is common in DLB and many patients also have excessive daytime somnolence. Other sleep disorders in DLB include insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, and periodic limb movements during sleep.

In AD patients, common sleep behaviors include confusion in the early evening (“sundowning”) and frequent nighttime awakenings, often accompanied by wandering.²⁶ Orthostatic hypotension, impotence, urinary incontinence, and constipation are common in DLB. Lack of insight concerning personal cognitive, mood, and behavioral state is highly prevalent in AD patients and more common than in DLB.

Diagnostic evaluation

Because there are no definitive clinical markers for DLB, diagnosis is based on a detailed clinical and family history from the patient and a reliable informant, as well as a physical, neurologic, and mental status examination that looks for associated noncognitive symptoms, and neuropsychological evaluation. Reasons DLB may be misdiagnosed include:

• Some “core” clinical features of DLB may not appear or may overlap with AD.
• Presence and severity of concurrent AD pathology in DLB may modify the clinical presentation, with decreased rates of hallucinations and parkinsonism and increased neurofibrillary tangles.
• Failure to reliably identify fluctuations—variations in cognition and arousal, such as periods of unresponsiveness while awake (“zoning out”), excessive daytime somnolence, and disorganized speech.²⁷

Detecting and characterizing cognitive deficits in dementia patients using neuropsychological testing is important in establishing a clinical diagnosis, determining baseline levels of impairment, forming a prognosis, and initiating disease-specific treatments. Differences in neuropsychological findings in AD and DLB are outlined in Table 2.^16,28-33 Several studies have suggested using these measures to differentiate patients with DLB from those with AD.²⁰

Table 2

Diagnostic testing for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies

Evidence is insufficient to support using electroencephalographic and polysomnographic studies when initially evaluating patients with dementia. Brain CT or MRI are recommended as part of the initial evaluation of dementia patients to exclude treatable causes of dementia and help clarify the differential diagnosis. Occipital hypometabolism and hypoperfusion demonstrated on PET and SPECT imaging have high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating AD from DLB.

To diagnose DLB more consistently, look for core features of the disease, RBD, antipsychotic hypersensitivity, and decreased striatal binding at presynaptic DaT sites.¹⁵ Abnormal (low binding) DaT activity is the most reliable diagnostic marker for DLB.³⁴ Myocardial scintigraphy with MIBG is sensitive to pathologic changes of DLB before clinical expression and could overcome the difficulties of using clinical criteria alone to identify patients with DLB.³⁵ MIBG scintigraphy may be preferred to DaT scan because it is less expensive and its sensitivity and specificity to DLB are independent of the presence of parkinsonism.³⁵

For an overview of pharmacotherapy options for patients with AD or DLB, see Box 2.

Box 2

Related Resources

• Hanyu H, Sato T, Hirao K, et al. Differences in clinical course between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(2):212-217.
• Walker Z, McKeith I, Rodda J, et al. Comparison of cognitive decline between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000380.

Drug Brand Names

• Aripiprazole • Abilify
• Clonazepam • Klonopin
• Donepezil • Aricept
• Galantamine • Razadyne, Reminyl
• Levodopa • Dopar, Larodopa
• Memantine • Namenda
• Quetiapine • Seroquel
• Rivastigmine • Exelon

Disclosure

Drs. Bishnoi and Manepalli report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Dr. Grossberg serves as a consultant to Forest, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. His department receives research funding from Novartis, Janssen, and Pfizer.

Discuss this article at www.facebook.com/CurrentPsychiatry

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are the first and second most common causes of neurodegenerative dementia, respectively.^{“New Alzheimer’s disease guidelines: Implications for clinicians,” Current Psychiatry, March 2012, p. 15-20; http://bit.ly/UNYikk.}

The 2005 report of the DLB Consortium⁵ recognizes central, core, suggestive, and supportive features of DLB (Table 1).^5,10 These features are considered in the context of other confounding clinical conditions and the timing of cognitive and motor symptoms. The revised DLB criteria⁵ require a central feature of progressive cognitive decline. “Probable DLB” is when a patient presents with 2 core features or 1 core feature and ≥1 suggestive features. A diagnosis of “possible DLB” requires 1 core feature or 1 suggestive feature in the presence of progressive cognitive decline.

Table 1

Diagnostic criteria for AD and DLB

Biomarkers for AD, but not DLB

The 2011 diagnostic criteria for AD incorporate biomarkers that can be measured in vivo and reflect speci?c features of disease-related pathophysiologic processes. Biomarkers for AD are divided into 2 categories:¹¹

• amyloid-beta (Aβ) accumulation: abnormal tracer retention on amyloid positron emission topography (PET) imaging and low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42
• neuronal degeneration or injury: elevated CSF tau (total and phosphorylated tau), decreased ?uorodeoxyglucose uptake on PET in temporo-parietal cortices, and atrophy on structural MRI in the hippocampal and temporo-parietal regions.

No clinically applicable genotypic or CSF markers exist to support a DLB diagnosis, but there are many promising candidates, including elevated levels of CSF p-tau 181, CSF levels of alpha- and beta-synuclein,¹² and CSF beta-glucocerebrosidase levels.¹³ PET mapping of brain acetylcholinesterase activity,¹⁴ 123I-2β-carbomethoxy-3β- (4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl)nortropane single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) dopamine transporter (DaT) imaging¹⁵ and metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy also are promising methods. DaT scan SPECT is FDA-approved for detecting loss of functional dopaminergic neuron terminals in the striatum and can differentiate between AD and DLB with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% to 88% and 94% to 100%, respectively.¹⁶ This test is covered by Medicare for differentiating AD and DLB.

Differences in presentation

Cognitive impairment. Contrary to the early memory impairment that characterizes AD, memory deficits in DLB usually appear later in the disease course.⁵ Patients with DLB manifest greater attentional, visuospatial, and executive impairments than those with AD, whereas AD causes more profound episodic (declarative) memory impairment than DLB. DLB patients show more preserved consolidation and storage of verbal information than AD patients because of less neuroanatomical and cholinergic compromise in the medial temporal lobe. There is no evidence of significant differences in remote memory, semantic memory, and language (naming and fluency).

Compromised attention in DLB may be the basis for fluctuating cognition, a characteristic of the disease. The greater attentional impairment and reaction time variability in DLB compared with AD is evident during complex tasks for attention and may be a function of the executive and visuospatial demands of the tasks.¹⁷

Executive functions critical to adaptive, goal-directed behavior are more impaired in DLB than AD. DLB patients are more susceptible to distraction and have difficulty engaging in a task and shifting from 1 task to another. This, together with a tendency for confabulation and perseveration, are signs of executive dysfunction.

Neuropsychiatric features. DLB patients are more likely than AD patients to exhibit psychiatric symptoms and have more functional impairment.¹⁸ In an analysis of autopsy-confirmed cases, hallucinations and delusions were more frequent with Lewy body pathology (75%) than AD (21%) at initial clinical evaluation.¹⁸ By the end stages of both illnesses, the degree of psychotic symptoms is comparable.¹⁹ Depression is common in DLB; whether base rates of depressed mood and major depression differ between DLB and AD is uncertain.²⁰

Psychosis in AD can be induced by medication or delirium, or triggered by poor sensory perceptions. Psychotic symptoms occur more frequently during the moderate and advanced stages of AD, when patients present with visual hallucinations, delusions, or delusional misidentifications. As many as 10% to 20% of patients with AD experience hallucinations, typically visual. Delusions occur in 30% to 50% of AD patients, usually in the later stages of the disease. The most common delusional themes are infidelity, theft, and paranoia. Female sex is a risk factor for psychosis in AD. Delusions co-occur with aggression, anxiety, and aberrant motor behavior.

Visual hallucinations—mostly vivid, well-formed, false perceptions of insects, animals, or people—are the defining feature of DLB.²¹ Many patients recognize that they are experiencing visual hallucinations and can ignore them. DLB patients also may experience visual illusions, such as misperceiving household objects as living beings. Delusions—typically paranoid—are common among DLB patients, as are depression and anxiety.¹ Agitation or aggressive behavior tends to occur late in the illness, if at all.

The causes of psychotic symptoms in DLB are not fully understood, but dopamine dysfunction likely is involved in hallucinations, delusions, and agitation, and serotonin dysfunction may be associated with depression and anxiety. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep/wakefulness dysregulation, in which the dream imagery of REM sleep may occur during wakefulness, also has been proposed as a mechanism for visual hallucinations in DLB.²² In DLB, psychotic symptoms occur early and are a hallmark of this illness, whereas in AD they usually occur in the middle to late stages of the disease.

Motor symptoms. In AD, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) are common later in the disease, are strongly correlated with disease severity, and are a strong, independent predictor of depression severity.²³ EPS are more common in DLB than in AD²⁴ and DLB patients are at higher risk of developing EPS even with low doses of typical antipsychotics, compared with AD patients.²⁵

Other symptoms. REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is characterized by enacting dreams—often violent—during REM sleep. RBD is common in DLB and many patients also have excessive daytime somnolence. Other sleep disorders in DLB include insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, central sleep apnea, restless legs syndrome, and periodic limb movements during sleep.

In AD patients, common sleep behaviors include confusion in the early evening (“sundowning”) and frequent nighttime awakenings, often accompanied by wandering.²⁶ Orthostatic hypotension, impotence, urinary incontinence, and constipation are common in DLB. Lack of insight concerning personal cognitive, mood, and behavioral state is highly prevalent in AD patients and more common than in DLB.

Diagnostic evaluation

Because there are no definitive clinical markers for DLB, diagnosis is based on a detailed clinical and family history from the patient and a reliable informant, as well as a physical, neurologic, and mental status examination that looks for associated noncognitive symptoms, and neuropsychological evaluation. Reasons DLB may be misdiagnosed include:

• Some “core” clinical features of DLB may not appear or may overlap with AD.
• Presence and severity of concurrent AD pathology in DLB may modify the clinical presentation, with decreased rates of hallucinations and parkinsonism and increased neurofibrillary tangles.
• Failure to reliably identify fluctuations—variations in cognition and arousal, such as periods of unresponsiveness while awake (“zoning out”), excessive daytime somnolence, and disorganized speech.²⁷

Detecting and characterizing cognitive deficits in dementia patients using neuropsychological testing is important in establishing a clinical diagnosis, determining baseline levels of impairment, forming a prognosis, and initiating disease-specific treatments. Differences in neuropsychological findings in AD and DLB are outlined in Table 2.^16,28-33 Several studies have suggested using these measures to differentiate patients with DLB from those with AD.²⁰

Table 2

Diagnostic testing for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies

Evidence is insufficient to support using electroencephalographic and polysomnographic studies when initially evaluating patients with dementia. Brain CT or MRI are recommended as part of the initial evaluation of dementia patients to exclude treatable causes of dementia and help clarify the differential diagnosis. Occipital hypometabolism and hypoperfusion demonstrated on PET and SPECT imaging have high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating AD from DLB.

To diagnose DLB more consistently, look for core features of the disease, RBD, antipsychotic hypersensitivity, and decreased striatal binding at presynaptic DaT sites.¹⁵ Abnormal (low binding) DaT activity is the most reliable diagnostic marker for DLB.³⁴ Myocardial scintigraphy with MIBG is sensitive to pathologic changes of DLB before clinical expression and could overcome the difficulties of using clinical criteria alone to identify patients with DLB.³⁵ MIBG scintigraphy may be preferred to DaT scan because it is less expensive and its sensitivity and specificity to DLB are independent of the presence of parkinsonism.³⁵

For an overview of pharmacotherapy options for patients with AD or DLB, see Box 2.

Box 2

Related Resources

• Hanyu H, Sato T, Hirao K, et al. Differences in clinical course between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(2):212-217.
• Walker Z, McKeith I, Rodda J, et al. Comparison of cognitive decline between dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer’s disease: a cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e000380.

Drug Brand Names

• Aripiprazole • Abilify
• Clonazepam • Klonopin
• Donepezil • Aricept
• Galantamine • Razadyne, Reminyl
• Levodopa • Dopar, Larodopa
• Memantine • Namenda
• Quetiapine • Seroquel
• Rivastigmine • Exelon

Disclosure

Drs. Bishnoi and Manepalli report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Dr. Grossberg serves as a consultant to Forest, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer. His department receives research funding from Novartis, Janssen, and Pfizer.

Despite the widespread dissemination of information about the health risks associated with smoking, many cancer patients continue to smoke, which results in a decreased quality of life, an increased probability of cancer recurrence, and a decreased survival time. Efficacious interventions are available to assist cancer patients to quit smoking, yet smoking cessation interventions are often not implemented. This review describes how clinicians, administrators, insurers, and purchasers can encourage a culture of health care in which tobacco cessation interventions are implemented consistent with evidence-based standards of care. Implementing efficacious tobacco cessation interventions can reduce morbidity and mortality among cancer patients...

*Click on the link to the left of this introduction for a PDF of the full article.  

Despite the widespread dissemination of information about the health risks associated with smoking, many cancer patients continue to smoke, which results in a decreased quality of life, an increased probability of cancer recurrence, and a decreased survival time. Efficacious interventions are available to assist cancer patients to quit smoking, yet smoking cessation interventions are often not implemented. This review describes how clinicians, administrators, insurers, and purchasers can encourage a culture of health care in which tobacco cessation interventions are implemented consistent with evidence-based standards of care. Implementing efficacious tobacco cessation interventions can reduce morbidity and mortality among cancer patients...

*Click on the link to the left of this introduction for a PDF of the full article.  

Despite the widespread dissemination of information about the health risks associated with smoking, many cancer patients continue to smoke, which results in a decreased quality of life, an increased probability of cancer recurrence, and a decreased survival time. Efficacious interventions are available to assist cancer patients to quit smoking, yet smoking cessation interventions are often not implemented. This review describes how clinicians, administrators, insurers, and purchasers can encourage a culture of health care in which tobacco cessation interventions are implemented consistent with evidence-based standards of care. Implementing efficacious tobacco cessation interventions can reduce morbidity and mortality among cancer patients...

*Click on the link to the left of this introduction for a PDF of the full article.  

Dasatinib has been approved for first-line treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia by the Food and Drug Administration and is recommended as a first-line treatment option by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Based on in vitro data, dasatinib seems to be less susceptible to the resistance mechanisms that affect imatinib. Dasatinib is an effective second-line treatment in patients who are resistant to imatinib. First-line clinical data show that dasatinib provides more rapid and deeper degrees of response than does imatinib, which may correlate with improvements in long-term patient outcome. Grade 1 or 2 cytopenias are the most common adverse events of first-line dasatinib treatment. In a phase 3 comparison with imatinib, several types of nonhematologic adverse events were less frequent in the dasatinib arm; frequencies of grade 3 and 4 events were   2%. Among patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, grade 1 or 2 pleural effusion was reported in 14% of dasatinib-treated patients and was manageable in almost all cases; no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion occurred. Prompt and effective monitoring and management of dasatinib toxicities is essential to minimize intolerance and nonadherence to therapy. Patient education is important to increase the likelihood of prompt management and provide reassurance. Recommendations for patient monitoring, management, and education are provided.

*For a PDF of the full article, click on the link to the left of this introduction.

Dasatinib has been approved for first-line treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia by the Food and Drug Administration and is recommended as a first-line treatment option by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Based on in vitro data, dasatinib seems to be less susceptible to the resistance mechanisms that affect imatinib. Dasatinib is an effective second-line treatment in patients who are resistant to imatinib. First-line clinical data show that dasatinib provides more rapid and deeper degrees of response than does imatinib, which may correlate with improvements in long-term patient outcome. Grade 1 or 2 cytopenias are the most common adverse events of first-line dasatinib treatment. In a phase 3 comparison with imatinib, several types of nonhematologic adverse events were less frequent in the dasatinib arm; frequencies of grade 3 and 4 events were   2%. Among patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, grade 1 or 2 pleural effusion was reported in 14% of dasatinib-treated patients and was manageable in almost all cases; no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion occurred. Prompt and effective monitoring and management of dasatinib toxicities is essential to minimize intolerance and nonadherence to therapy. Patient education is important to increase the likelihood of prompt management and provide reassurance. Recommendations for patient monitoring, management, and education are provided.

*For a PDF of the full article, click on the link to the left of this introduction.

Dasatinib has been approved for first-line treatment of chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia by the Food and Drug Administration and is recommended as a first-line treatment option by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Based on in vitro data, dasatinib seems to be less susceptible to the resistance mechanisms that affect imatinib. Dasatinib is an effective second-line treatment in patients who are resistant to imatinib. First-line clinical data show that dasatinib provides more rapid and deeper degrees of response than does imatinib, which may correlate with improvements in long-term patient outcome. Grade 1 or 2 cytopenias are the most common adverse events of first-line dasatinib treatment. In a phase 3 comparison with imatinib, several types of nonhematologic adverse events were less frequent in the dasatinib arm; frequencies of grade 3 and 4 events were   2%. Among patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, grade 1 or 2 pleural effusion was reported in 14% of dasatinib-treated patients and was manageable in almost all cases; no grade 3 or 4 pleural effusion occurred. Prompt and effective monitoring and management of dasatinib toxicities is essential to minimize intolerance and nonadherence to therapy. Patient education is important to increase the likelihood of prompt management and provide reassurance. Recommendations for patient monitoring, management, and education are provided.

*For a PDF of the full article, click on the link to the left of this introduction.