Case Letter

To the Editor:

A 33-year-old woman presented with tenderness of the left breast and nipple of 2 weeks’ duration and fever of 2 days’ duration. The pain was so severe it precluded nursing. She rented a hospital-grade electric breast pump to continue lactation but only could produce 1 ounce of milk daily. The mother had been breastfeeding her 13-month-old twins since birth and did not report any prior difficulties with breastfeeding. Both twins had a history of mucosal sores 2 months prior and a recent outbreak of perioral vesicles following an upper respiratory tract illness that was consistent with gingivostomatitis, followed by a cutaneous outbreak secondary to herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 infection. The patient had no known history of HSV infection. Prior to presentation the patient was treated with oral dicloxacillin and then cephalexin for suspected bacterial mastitis. She also had used combination clotrimazole-betamethasone cream for possible superficial candidiasis. The patient had no relief with these treatments.

Physical examination revealed approximately 20 microvesicles (<1 mm) on an erythematous base clustered around the left areola (Figure). Erythematous streaks were noted from the medial aspect of the areolar margin extending to the central sternum. The left breast was firm and engorged but without apparent plugged lactiferous ducts. There was no lymphadenopathy. No lesions were present on the palms, soles, and oral mucosa.

The patient was empirically treated with valacyclovir, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs while awaiting laboratory results. Bacterial cultures were negative. Viral titers revealed positive combination HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgM (4.64 [<0.91=negative, 0.91–1.09=equivocal, >1.09=positive]) and negative HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG (<0.91[<0.91=negative, 0.91–1.09=equivocal, >1.09=positive]), which confirmed the diagnosis of primary HSV infection. Two months later viral titers were positive for HSV-1 IgG (1.3) and negative for HSV-2 IgG (<0.91).

At 1-week follow-up the patient reported that the fever had subsided 1 day after initial presentation. After commencement of antiviral therapy, she continued to have some mild residual tenderness, but the vesicles had crusted over and markedly improved. Upon further questioning, the patient’s husband had a history of oral HSV-1 and was likely the primary source for the infection in the infants.

Herpes simplex virus infection primarily is transmitted through direct mucocutaneous contact with either oral or genital lesions of an infected individual. Transmission of HSV from infant to mother rarely is described. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms herpes mastitis, herpes of the breast, infant to maternal transmission, gingivostomatitis, primary herpes, and breastfeeding yielded 4 reported cases of HSV of the nipple in breastfeeding women from children with herpetic gingivostomatitis.^1-4

Herpes simplex virus infection is common in neonatal and pediatric populations. In the United States, more than 30% of children (aged <14 years) have evidence of HSV-1 infection on serology. Herpes simplex virus infections in children can range from uncomplicated mucocutaneous diseases to severe life-threatening infections involving the central nervous system. In children, antivirals should be initiated within 72 hours of symptom onset to prevent more serious complications. Diagnostic testing was not performed on the infants in this case because the 72-hour treatment window had passed. In particular, neonates (aged <3 months) will require intravenous antivirals to prevent the development of central nervous system disease, which occurs in 33% of neonatal HSV infections.⁵ It is critically important to confirm the diagnosis of HSV in a breastfeeding woman, when clinically indicated, with a viral culture, serology, direct immunofluorescence assay, polymerase chain reaction, or Tzanck smear because other conditions such as plugged lactiferous ducts, candidal mastitis, or bacterial mastitis may mimic HSV. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of the breastfeeding woman with HSV of the nipple can help identify children with herpetic gingivostomatitis that is not readily apparent.

To the Editor:

A 33-year-old woman presented with tenderness of the left breast and nipple of 2 weeks’ duration and fever of 2 days’ duration. The pain was so severe it precluded nursing. She rented a hospital-grade electric breast pump to continue lactation but only could produce 1 ounce of milk daily. The mother had been breastfeeding her 13-month-old twins since birth and did not report any prior difficulties with breastfeeding. Both twins had a history of mucosal sores 2 months prior and a recent outbreak of perioral vesicles following an upper respiratory tract illness that was consistent with gingivostomatitis, followed by a cutaneous outbreak secondary to herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 infection. The patient had no known history of HSV infection. Prior to presentation the patient was treated with oral dicloxacillin and then cephalexin for suspected bacterial mastitis. She also had used combination clotrimazole-betamethasone cream for possible superficial candidiasis. The patient had no relief with these treatments.

Physical examination revealed approximately 20 microvesicles (<1 mm) on an erythematous base clustered around the left areola (Figure). Erythematous streaks were noted from the medial aspect of the areolar margin extending to the central sternum. The left breast was firm and engorged but without apparent plugged lactiferous ducts. There was no lymphadenopathy. No lesions were present on the palms, soles, and oral mucosa.

The patient was empirically treated with valacyclovir, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs while awaiting laboratory results. Bacterial cultures were negative. Viral titers revealed positive combination HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgM (4.64 [<0.91=negative, 0.91–1.09=equivocal, >1.09=positive]) and negative HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG (<0.91[<0.91=negative, 0.91–1.09=equivocal, >1.09=positive]), which confirmed the diagnosis of primary HSV infection. Two months later viral titers were positive for HSV-1 IgG (1.3) and negative for HSV-2 IgG (<0.91).

At 1-week follow-up the patient reported that the fever had subsided 1 day after initial presentation. After commencement of antiviral therapy, she continued to have some mild residual tenderness, but the vesicles had crusted over and markedly improved. Upon further questioning, the patient’s husband had a history of oral HSV-1 and was likely the primary source for the infection in the infants.

Herpes simplex virus infection primarily is transmitted through direct mucocutaneous contact with either oral or genital lesions of an infected individual. Transmission of HSV from infant to mother rarely is described. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms herpes mastitis, herpes of the breast, infant to maternal transmission, gingivostomatitis, primary herpes, and breastfeeding yielded 4 reported cases of HSV of the nipple in breastfeeding women from children with herpetic gingivostomatitis.^1-4

Herpes simplex virus infection is common in neonatal and pediatric populations. In the United States, more than 30% of children (aged <14 years) have evidence of HSV-1 infection on serology. Herpes simplex virus infections in children can range from uncomplicated mucocutaneous diseases to severe life-threatening infections involving the central nervous system. In children, antivirals should be initiated within 72 hours of symptom onset to prevent more serious complications. Diagnostic testing was not performed on the infants in this case because the 72-hour treatment window had passed. In particular, neonates (aged <3 months) will require intravenous antivirals to prevent the development of central nervous system disease, which occurs in 33% of neonatal HSV infections.⁵ It is critically important to confirm the diagnosis of HSV in a breastfeeding woman, when clinically indicated, with a viral culture, serology, direct immunofluorescence assay, polymerase chain reaction, or Tzanck smear because other conditions such as plugged lactiferous ducts, candidal mastitis, or bacterial mastitis may mimic HSV. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of the breastfeeding woman with HSV of the nipple can help identify children with herpetic gingivostomatitis that is not readily apparent.

To the Editor:

A 33-year-old woman presented with tenderness of the left breast and nipple of 2 weeks’ duration and fever of 2 days’ duration. The pain was so severe it precluded nursing. She rented a hospital-grade electric breast pump to continue lactation but only could produce 1 ounce of milk daily. The mother had been breastfeeding her 13-month-old twins since birth and did not report any prior difficulties with breastfeeding. Both twins had a history of mucosal sores 2 months prior and a recent outbreak of perioral vesicles following an upper respiratory tract illness that was consistent with gingivostomatitis, followed by a cutaneous outbreak secondary to herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 infection. The patient had no known history of HSV infection. Prior to presentation the patient was treated with oral dicloxacillin and then cephalexin for suspected bacterial mastitis. She also had used combination clotrimazole-betamethasone cream for possible superficial candidiasis. The patient had no relief with these treatments.

Physical examination revealed approximately 20 microvesicles (<1 mm) on an erythematous base clustered around the left areola (Figure). Erythematous streaks were noted from the medial aspect of the areolar margin extending to the central sternum. The left breast was firm and engorged but without apparent plugged lactiferous ducts. There was no lymphadenopathy. No lesions were present on the palms, soles, and oral mucosa.

The patient was empirically treated with valacyclovir, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs while awaiting laboratory results. Bacterial cultures were negative. Viral titers revealed positive combination HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgM (4.64 [<0.91=negative, 0.91–1.09=equivocal, >1.09=positive]) and negative HSV-1 and HSV-2 IgG (<0.91[<0.91=negative, 0.91–1.09=equivocal, >1.09=positive]), which confirmed the diagnosis of primary HSV infection. Two months later viral titers were positive for HSV-1 IgG (1.3) and negative for HSV-2 IgG (<0.91).

At 1-week follow-up the patient reported that the fever had subsided 1 day after initial presentation. After commencement of antiviral therapy, she continued to have some mild residual tenderness, but the vesicles had crusted over and markedly improved. Upon further questioning, the patient’s husband had a history of oral HSV-1 and was likely the primary source for the infection in the infants.

Herpes simplex virus infection primarily is transmitted through direct mucocutaneous contact with either oral or genital lesions of an infected individual. Transmission of HSV from infant to mother rarely is described. A PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the terms herpes mastitis, herpes of the breast, infant to maternal transmission, gingivostomatitis, primary herpes, and breastfeeding yielded 4 reported cases of HSV of the nipple in breastfeeding women from children with herpetic gingivostomatitis.^1-4

Herpes simplex virus infection is common in neonatal and pediatric populations. In the United States, more than 30% of children (aged <14 years) have evidence of HSV-1 infection on serology. Herpes simplex virus infections in children can range from uncomplicated mucocutaneous diseases to severe life-threatening infections involving the central nervous system. In children, antivirals should be initiated within 72 hours of symptom onset to prevent more serious complications. Diagnostic testing was not performed on the infants in this case because the 72-hour treatment window had passed. In particular, neonates (aged <3 months) will require intravenous antivirals to prevent the development of central nervous system disease, which occurs in 33% of neonatal HSV infections.⁵ It is critically important to confirm the diagnosis of HSV in a breastfeeding woman, when clinically indicated, with a viral culture, serology, direct immunofluorescence assay, polymerase chain reaction, or Tzanck smear because other conditions such as plugged lactiferous ducts, candidal mastitis, or bacterial mastitis may mimic HSV. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of the breastfeeding woman with HSV of the nipple can help identify children with herpetic gingivostomatitis that is not readily apparent.

To the Editor:

A 52-year-old man presented with recalcitrant dermatitis of 6 years’ duration. He was otherwise in excellent health. On initial presentation, physical examination revealed symmetrical, erythematous, blanching plaques with areas of erosions and overlying hemorrhagic crust on the eyebrows, scalp, back, dorsal aspects of the hands, axillae, abdomen (Figure), buttocks, groin, scrotum, pubis, and lower legs. Some areas showed slight necrosis. He denied any fevers, chills, night sweats, cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, lightheadedness, weight loss, or appetite change.

Throughout the disease course the patient had visited numerous dermatologists seeking treatment. He had response to higher doses of oral prednisone (80 mg taper), but the condition would recur at the end of an extended taper. Treatment with narrowband UVB, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, acitretin, topical clobetasol, and topical pimecrolimus provided no relief. Eventually he was placed on azathioprine 100 mg twice daily, which led to near-complete resolution. Outbreaks continued every few months and required courses of prednisone.

Multiple biopsies over the years revealed subacute spongiotic or psoriasiform dermatitis. At multiple visits it was noted that during flares there were areas of crusting and mild necrosis, which led to an extensive biochemical investigation. The glucagon level was markedly elevated at 630 ng/L (reference range, 40–130 ng/L), as was insulin at 71 μIU/mL (reference range, 6–27 μIU/mL). Complete blood cell counts over the disease course showed mild normochromic normocytic anemia. The abnormal laboratory findings led to computed tomography of the abdomen, which revealed a mass in the body of the pancreas measuring 3×3.8 cm. After computed tomography, the patient underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Histologic examination revealed a well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine tumor (glucagonoma) confined to the pancreas. After the surgery, the patient’s rash resolved within a few days and he discontinued all medications.

Diagnosis of glucagonomas often is delayed due to their rarity and lack of classical signs and symptoms. The distribution of the lesions seen in necrolytic migratory erythema (NME) usually involves the inguinal crease, perineum, lower extremities, buttocks, and other intertriginous areas.¹ Our patient had involvement in the typical distribution but also had involvement of the scalp, face, and upper body. The typical histology for NME is crusted psoriasiform dermatitis with a tendency for the upper epidermis to have necrosis and a vacuolated pale epidermis.² Our patient’s histologic findings were less specific showing epidermal spongiosis with a scant lymphocytic infiltrate and at times acanthosis. The lack of classical skin findings and histology delayed diagnosis. In more than 50% of patients, metastasis has already occurred by the time the patient is diagnosed.³ Treatment is aimed at complete removal of the pancreatic tumor, which typically leads to a rapid improvement in symptoms. For patients unable to undergo surgery, chemotherapy agents and octreotide are used; unfortunately, symptoms may persist.⁴ The response to azathioprine in our patient suggests it is a possible alternate therapy for those with persistent NME.

This patient highlights the difficulty of diagnosing a glucagonoma when the only clinical manifestation may be NME. Moreover, skin biopsies that can sometimes be diagnostic may be nonspecific. This patient also shows a potential benefit of azathioprine in the treatment of NME.

To the Editor:

A 52-year-old man presented with recalcitrant dermatitis of 6 years’ duration. He was otherwise in excellent health. On initial presentation, physical examination revealed symmetrical, erythematous, blanching plaques with areas of erosions and overlying hemorrhagic crust on the eyebrows, scalp, back, dorsal aspects of the hands, axillae, abdomen (Figure), buttocks, groin, scrotum, pubis, and lower legs. Some areas showed slight necrosis. He denied any fevers, chills, night sweats, cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, lightheadedness, weight loss, or appetite change.

Throughout the disease course the patient had visited numerous dermatologists seeking treatment. He had response to higher doses of oral prednisone (80 mg taper), but the condition would recur at the end of an extended taper. Treatment with narrowband UVB, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, acitretin, topical clobetasol, and topical pimecrolimus provided no relief. Eventually he was placed on azathioprine 100 mg twice daily, which led to near-complete resolution. Outbreaks continued every few months and required courses of prednisone.

Multiple biopsies over the years revealed subacute spongiotic or psoriasiform dermatitis. At multiple visits it was noted that during flares there were areas of crusting and mild necrosis, which led to an extensive biochemical investigation. The glucagon level was markedly elevated at 630 ng/L (reference range, 40–130 ng/L), as was insulin at 71 μIU/mL (reference range, 6–27 μIU/mL). Complete blood cell counts over the disease course showed mild normochromic normocytic anemia. The abnormal laboratory findings led to computed tomography of the abdomen, which revealed a mass in the body of the pancreas measuring 3×3.8 cm. After computed tomography, the patient underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Histologic examination revealed a well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine tumor (glucagonoma) confined to the pancreas. After the surgery, the patient’s rash resolved within a few days and he discontinued all medications.

Diagnosis of glucagonomas often is delayed due to their rarity and lack of classical signs and symptoms. The distribution of the lesions seen in necrolytic migratory erythema (NME) usually involves the inguinal crease, perineum, lower extremities, buttocks, and other intertriginous areas.¹ Our patient had involvement in the typical distribution but also had involvement of the scalp, face, and upper body. The typical histology for NME is crusted psoriasiform dermatitis with a tendency for the upper epidermis to have necrosis and a vacuolated pale epidermis.² Our patient’s histologic findings were less specific showing epidermal spongiosis with a scant lymphocytic infiltrate and at times acanthosis. The lack of classical skin findings and histology delayed diagnosis. In more than 50% of patients, metastasis has already occurred by the time the patient is diagnosed.³ Treatment is aimed at complete removal of the pancreatic tumor, which typically leads to a rapid improvement in symptoms. For patients unable to undergo surgery, chemotherapy agents and octreotide are used; unfortunately, symptoms may persist.⁴ The response to azathioprine in our patient suggests it is a possible alternate therapy for those with persistent NME.

This patient highlights the difficulty of diagnosing a glucagonoma when the only clinical manifestation may be NME. Moreover, skin biopsies that can sometimes be diagnostic may be nonspecific. This patient also shows a potential benefit of azathioprine in the treatment of NME.

To the Editor:

A 52-year-old man presented with recalcitrant dermatitis of 6 years’ duration. He was otherwise in excellent health. On initial presentation, physical examination revealed symmetrical, erythematous, blanching plaques with areas of erosions and overlying hemorrhagic crust on the eyebrows, scalp, back, dorsal aspects of the hands, axillae, abdomen (Figure), buttocks, groin, scrotum, pubis, and lower legs. Some areas showed slight necrosis. He denied any fevers, chills, night sweats, cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, lightheadedness, weight loss, or appetite change.

Throughout the disease course the patient had visited numerous dermatologists seeking treatment. He had response to higher doses of oral prednisone (80 mg taper), but the condition would recur at the end of an extended taper. Treatment with narrowband UVB, mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, acitretin, topical clobetasol, and topical pimecrolimus provided no relief. Eventually he was placed on azathioprine 100 mg twice daily, which led to near-complete resolution. Outbreaks continued every few months and required courses of prednisone.

Multiple biopsies over the years revealed subacute spongiotic or psoriasiform dermatitis. At multiple visits it was noted that during flares there were areas of crusting and mild necrosis, which led to an extensive biochemical investigation. The glucagon level was markedly elevated at 630 ng/L (reference range, 40–130 ng/L), as was insulin at 71 μIU/mL (reference range, 6–27 μIU/mL). Complete blood cell counts over the disease course showed mild normochromic normocytic anemia. The abnormal laboratory findings led to computed tomography of the abdomen, which revealed a mass in the body of the pancreas measuring 3×3.8 cm. After computed tomography, the patient underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Histologic examination revealed a well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine tumor (glucagonoma) confined to the pancreas. After the surgery, the patient’s rash resolved within a few days and he discontinued all medications.

Diagnosis of glucagonomas often is delayed due to their rarity and lack of classical signs and symptoms. The distribution of the lesions seen in necrolytic migratory erythema (NME) usually involves the inguinal crease, perineum, lower extremities, buttocks, and other intertriginous areas.¹ Our patient had involvement in the typical distribution but also had involvement of the scalp, face, and upper body. The typical histology for NME is crusted psoriasiform dermatitis with a tendency for the upper epidermis to have necrosis and a vacuolated pale epidermis.² Our patient’s histologic findings were less specific showing epidermal spongiosis with a scant lymphocytic infiltrate and at times acanthosis. The lack of classical skin findings and histology delayed diagnosis. In more than 50% of patients, metastasis has already occurred by the time the patient is diagnosed.³ Treatment is aimed at complete removal of the pancreatic tumor, which typically leads to a rapid improvement in symptoms. For patients unable to undergo surgery, chemotherapy agents and octreotide are used; unfortunately, symptoms may persist.⁴ The response to azathioprine in our patient suggests it is a possible alternate therapy for those with persistent NME.

This patient highlights the difficulty of diagnosing a glucagonoma when the only clinical manifestation may be NME. Moreover, skin biopsies that can sometimes be diagnostic may be nonspecific. This patient also shows a potential benefit of azathioprine in the treatment of NME.

To the Editor:

Experience, subjective opinion, and relationships with patients are cornerstones of general practice but also can be pitfalls. It is common for a late-presenting patient to offer a seemingly rational explanation for a long-standing lesion. Unless an objective analysis of the clinical problem is undertaken, it can be easy to embark on an incorrect treatment pathway for the patient’s condition.

One of the luxuries of specialist hospital medicine or surgery is the ability to focus on a narrow range of clinical problems, which makes it easier to spot the anomaly, as long as it is within the purview of the practitioner. We report 2 cases of skin malignancies that were assumed to be chronic wounds of benign etiology.

A 63-year-old builder was referred by his general practitioner with a chronic wound on the right forearm of 4 years’ duration. His medical history included psoriasis, and he did not have a history of diabetes mellitus or use of immunosuppressants. The general practitioner suggested possible incidental origin following a prior trauma or a psoriatic-related lesion. The patient reported that the lesion did not resemble prior psoriatic lesions and it had deteriorated substantially over the last 2 years. Furthermore, a small ulcer was starting to develop on the left forearm. Further advice was requested by the general practitioner regarding wound dressings. On examination a sloughy ulcer measuring 8.5×7.5 cm had eroded to expose necrotic tendons with surrounding induration and cellulitis (Figure 1A). In addition, a psoriatic lesion was found on the left forearm (Figure 1B). There were no palpable axillary lymph nodes. Clinical suspicion, incision biopsies, and subsequent histology confirmed cutaneous CD4⁺ T-cell lymphoma. This case was reviewed at a multidisciplinary team meeting and referred to the hematology-oncology department. The patient subsequently underwent chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin and radiotherapy over a period of 5 months. An elective right forearm amputation was planned due to erosion of the ulcer through tendons down to bone (Figure 2).

These 2 cases highlight easy pitfalls for an unsuspecting clinician. Although both cases had alternative plausible explanations, they proved to be cutaneous malignancies. The powerful message these cases send is that long-standing chronic wounds should be biopsied to exclude malignancy. Some of the other common underlying causes of wounds that may prevent healing are highlighted in the Table. Vascular insufficiency usually presents in characteristic patterns with a good clinical history and associated signs and findings on investigation. A foreign body, which can be anything from an orthopedic metal implant to a retained stitch from surgery or nonmedical material, may be the culprit and may be identified from a thorough medical history or appropriate imaging.

Infection is another possible explanation of a nonhealing wound. On the face, an underlying dental abscess with a sinus tracking from the root of the tooth to the skin of the cheek or jaw may be the source. Elsewhere on the body, chronic osteomyelitis may be the cause, which may be from any infective origin from Staphylococcus aureus to tuberculosis, and will most commonly present with a discharging sinus but also may present with a nonspecific ulcer.

Chronic wounds also may not heal because of a multitude of patient factors such as poor nutrition, diabetes mellitus, medication (eg, steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), other inflammatory causes, and poor mobility. Chronic wounds represent a substantial burden to patients, health care professionals, and the health care system. In the United States alone, they affect 5.7 million patients and cost an estimated $20 billion.¹ Approximately 1% of the Western population will present with leg ulceration at some point in their lives.²

Physical examination of ulcers in any clinical setting can be difficult. We postulate that it can be made more difficult at times in primary care because the patient may add confounding elements for consideration or seemingly plausible explanations. However, whenever possible, a physician should ask, “Could there possibly be an underlying malignancy here?” If there is any chance of malignancy despite plausible explanations being offered, the lesion should be biopsied.

To the Editor:

Experience, subjective opinion, and relationships with patients are cornerstones of general practice but also can be pitfalls. It is common for a late-presenting patient to offer a seemingly rational explanation for a long-standing lesion. Unless an objective analysis of the clinical problem is undertaken, it can be easy to embark on an incorrect treatment pathway for the patient’s condition.

One of the luxuries of specialist hospital medicine or surgery is the ability to focus on a narrow range of clinical problems, which makes it easier to spot the anomaly, as long as it is within the purview of the practitioner. We report 2 cases of skin malignancies that were assumed to be chronic wounds of benign etiology.

A 63-year-old builder was referred by his general practitioner with a chronic wound on the right forearm of 4 years’ duration. His medical history included psoriasis, and he did not have a history of diabetes mellitus or use of immunosuppressants. The general practitioner suggested possible incidental origin following a prior trauma or a psoriatic-related lesion. The patient reported that the lesion did not resemble prior psoriatic lesions and it had deteriorated substantially over the last 2 years. Furthermore, a small ulcer was starting to develop on the left forearm. Further advice was requested by the general practitioner regarding wound dressings. On examination a sloughy ulcer measuring 8.5×7.5 cm had eroded to expose necrotic tendons with surrounding induration and cellulitis (Figure 1A). In addition, a psoriatic lesion was found on the left forearm (Figure 1B). There were no palpable axillary lymph nodes. Clinical suspicion, incision biopsies, and subsequent histology confirmed cutaneous CD4⁺ T-cell lymphoma. This case was reviewed at a multidisciplinary team meeting and referred to the hematology-oncology department. The patient subsequently underwent chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin and radiotherapy over a period of 5 months. An elective right forearm amputation was planned due to erosion of the ulcer through tendons down to bone (Figure 2).

These 2 cases highlight easy pitfalls for an unsuspecting clinician. Although both cases had alternative plausible explanations, they proved to be cutaneous malignancies. The powerful message these cases send is that long-standing chronic wounds should be biopsied to exclude malignancy. Some of the other common underlying causes of wounds that may prevent healing are highlighted in the Table. Vascular insufficiency usually presents in characteristic patterns with a good clinical history and associated signs and findings on investigation. A foreign body, which can be anything from an orthopedic metal implant to a retained stitch from surgery or nonmedical material, may be the culprit and may be identified from a thorough medical history or appropriate imaging.

Infection is another possible explanation of a nonhealing wound. On the face, an underlying dental abscess with a sinus tracking from the root of the tooth to the skin of the cheek or jaw may be the source. Elsewhere on the body, chronic osteomyelitis may be the cause, which may be from any infective origin from Staphylococcus aureus to tuberculosis, and will most commonly present with a discharging sinus but also may present with a nonspecific ulcer.

Chronic wounds also may not heal because of a multitude of patient factors such as poor nutrition, diabetes mellitus, medication (eg, steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), other inflammatory causes, and poor mobility. Chronic wounds represent a substantial burden to patients, health care professionals, and the health care system. In the United States alone, they affect 5.7 million patients and cost an estimated $20 billion.¹ Approximately 1% of the Western population will present with leg ulceration at some point in their lives.²

Physical examination of ulcers in any clinical setting can be difficult. We postulate that it can be made more difficult at times in primary care because the patient may add confounding elements for consideration or seemingly plausible explanations. However, whenever possible, a physician should ask, “Could there possibly be an underlying malignancy here?” If there is any chance of malignancy despite plausible explanations being offered, the lesion should be biopsied.

To the Editor:

Experience, subjective opinion, and relationships with patients are cornerstones of general practice but also can be pitfalls. It is common for a late-presenting patient to offer a seemingly rational explanation for a long-standing lesion. Unless an objective analysis of the clinical problem is undertaken, it can be easy to embark on an incorrect treatment pathway for the patient’s condition.

One of the luxuries of specialist hospital medicine or surgery is the ability to focus on a narrow range of clinical problems, which makes it easier to spot the anomaly, as long as it is within the purview of the practitioner. We report 2 cases of skin malignancies that were assumed to be chronic wounds of benign etiology.

A 63-year-old builder was referred by his general practitioner with a chronic wound on the right forearm of 4 years’ duration. His medical history included psoriasis, and he did not have a history of diabetes mellitus or use of immunosuppressants. The general practitioner suggested possible incidental origin following a prior trauma or a psoriatic-related lesion. The patient reported that the lesion did not resemble prior psoriatic lesions and it had deteriorated substantially over the last 2 years. Furthermore, a small ulcer was starting to develop on the left forearm. Further advice was requested by the general practitioner regarding wound dressings. On examination a sloughy ulcer measuring 8.5×7.5 cm had eroded to expose necrotic tendons with surrounding induration and cellulitis (Figure 1A). In addition, a psoriatic lesion was found on the left forearm (Figure 1B). There were no palpable axillary lymph nodes. Clinical suspicion, incision biopsies, and subsequent histology confirmed cutaneous CD4⁺ T-cell lymphoma. This case was reviewed at a multidisciplinary team meeting and referred to the hematology-oncology department. The patient subsequently underwent chemotherapy with liposomal doxorubicin and radiotherapy over a period of 5 months. An elective right forearm amputation was planned due to erosion of the ulcer through tendons down to bone (Figure 2).

These 2 cases highlight easy pitfalls for an unsuspecting clinician. Although both cases had alternative plausible explanations, they proved to be cutaneous malignancies. The powerful message these cases send is that long-standing chronic wounds should be biopsied to exclude malignancy. Some of the other common underlying causes of wounds that may prevent healing are highlighted in the Table. Vascular insufficiency usually presents in characteristic patterns with a good clinical history and associated signs and findings on investigation. A foreign body, which can be anything from an orthopedic metal implant to a retained stitch from surgery or nonmedical material, may be the culprit and may be identified from a thorough medical history or appropriate imaging.

Infection is another possible explanation of a nonhealing wound. On the face, an underlying dental abscess with a sinus tracking from the root of the tooth to the skin of the cheek or jaw may be the source. Elsewhere on the body, chronic osteomyelitis may be the cause, which may be from any infective origin from Staphylococcus aureus to tuberculosis, and will most commonly present with a discharging sinus but also may present with a nonspecific ulcer.

Chronic wounds also may not heal because of a multitude of patient factors such as poor nutrition, diabetes mellitus, medication (eg, steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), other inflammatory causes, and poor mobility. Chronic wounds represent a substantial burden to patients, health care professionals, and the health care system. In the United States alone, they affect 5.7 million patients and cost an estimated $20 billion.¹ Approximately 1% of the Western population will present with leg ulceration at some point in their lives.²

Physical examination of ulcers in any clinical setting can be difficult. We postulate that it can be made more difficult at times in primary care because the patient may add confounding elements for consideration or seemingly plausible explanations. However, whenever possible, a physician should ask, “Could there possibly be an underlying malignancy here?” If there is any chance of malignancy despite plausible explanations being offered, the lesion should be biopsied.

To the Editor:

Onychomadesis is characterized by separation of the nail plate from the matrix due to a temporary arrest in nail matrix activity. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is a relatively common viral infection, especially in children. Although the relationship between onychomadesis and HFMD has been noted, there are few reports in the literature.^1-9 We present 2 cases of onychomadesis following HFMD in Taiwanese siblings.

A 3-year-old girl presented with proximal nail plate detachment from the proximal nail fold on the bilateral great toenails (Figure 1) and a transverse whole-thickness sulcus on the bilateral thumbnails (Figure 2) of several weeks’ duration. Her 6-year-old sister had similar nail changes. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease was diagnosed about 4 weeks prior to nail changes. The mother reported that only the younger sister experienced fever. There was no history of notable medication intake, nail trauma, periungual erythema, vesicular lesion, or dermatitis. In both patients, the nail changes were temporary with spontaneous normal nail plate regrowth several months later. A diagnosis of onychomadesis was made.

The etiology of onychomadesis includes drug ingestion, especially chemotherapy; severe systemic diseases; high fever; infection, including viral illnesses such as influenza, measles, and HFMD; and idiopathic onychomadesis.^1,2,5,10 In 2000, Clementz and Mancini¹ reported 5 children with nail matrix arrest following HFMD and suggested an epidemic caused by the same virus strain. Bernier et al² reported another 4 cases and suggested more than one viral strain may have been implicated in the nail matrix arrest. Although these authors list HFMD as one of the causes of onychomadesis,^1,2 the number of cases reported was small; however, studies with a larger number of cases and even outbreak have been reported more recently.^3-8 Salazar et al³ reported an onychomadesis outbreak associated with HFMD in Valencia, Spain, in 2008 (N=298). This outbreak primarily was caused by coxsackievirus (CV) A10 (49% of cases).⁵ Another onychomadesis outbreak occurred in Saragossa, Spain, in 2008, and CV B1, B2, and unidentified nonpoliovirus enterovirus were isolated.⁶ Outbreaks also occurred in Finland in 2008, and the causative agents were identified as CV A6 and A10.^7,8 The latency period for onychomadesis following HFMD was 1 to 2 months (mean, 40 days), and the majority of cases occurred in patients younger than 6 years.^1-5 Not all of the nails were involved; in one report, each patient shed only 4 nails on average.⁶

Although there is a definite relationship between HFMD and onychomadesis, the mechanism is still unclear. Some authors claim that nail matrix arrest is caused by high fever¹⁰; however, we found that 40% (2/5)¹ to 63% (10/16)⁴ of reported cases did not have a fever. Additionally, only 1 of our patients had fever. Therefore high fever–induced nail matrix arrest is not a reasonable explanation. Davia et al⁵ observed no relationship between onychomadesis and the severity of HFMD. In addition, no serious complications of HFMD were mentioned in prior reports.

We propose that HFMD-related onychomadesis is caused by the viral infection itself, rather than by severe systemic disease.^1-5,7 Certain viral strains associated with HFMD can induce arrest of nail matrix activity. Osterback et al⁷ detected CV A6 in shed nail fragments and suggested that virus replication damaged the nail matrix and resulted in temporary nail dystrophy. This hypothesis can explain that only some nails, not all, were involved. In our cases, we noted an incomplete and slanted cleft on the thumbnail (Figure 2). We also found that incomplete onychomadesis appeared in the clinical photograph from a prior report.⁵ The slanted cleft in our case may be caused by secondary external force after original incomplete onychomadesis or a different rate of nail regrowth because of different intensity of nail matrix damage. The phenomenon of incomplete onychomadesis in the same nail further suggests the mechanism of onychomadesis following HFMD is localized nail matrix damage.

In conclusion, we report 2 cases of onychomadesis associated with HFMD. Our report highlights that there is no racial difference in post-HFMD onychomadesis. These cases highlight that HFMD is an important cause of onychomadesis, especially in children. We suggest that certain viral strains associated with HFMD may specifically arrest nail matrix growth activity, regardless of fever or disease severity.

To the Editor:

Onychomadesis is characterized by separation of the nail plate from the matrix due to a temporary arrest in nail matrix activity. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is a relatively common viral infection, especially in children. Although the relationship between onychomadesis and HFMD has been noted, there are few reports in the literature.^1-9 We present 2 cases of onychomadesis following HFMD in Taiwanese siblings.

A 3-year-old girl presented with proximal nail plate detachment from the proximal nail fold on the bilateral great toenails (Figure 1) and a transverse whole-thickness sulcus on the bilateral thumbnails (Figure 2) of several weeks’ duration. Her 6-year-old sister had similar nail changes. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease was diagnosed about 4 weeks prior to nail changes. The mother reported that only the younger sister experienced fever. There was no history of notable medication intake, nail trauma, periungual erythema, vesicular lesion, or dermatitis. In both patients, the nail changes were temporary with spontaneous normal nail plate regrowth several months later. A diagnosis of onychomadesis was made.

The etiology of onychomadesis includes drug ingestion, especially chemotherapy; severe systemic diseases; high fever; infection, including viral illnesses such as influenza, measles, and HFMD; and idiopathic onychomadesis.^1,2,5,10 In 2000, Clementz and Mancini¹ reported 5 children with nail matrix arrest following HFMD and suggested an epidemic caused by the same virus strain. Bernier et al² reported another 4 cases and suggested more than one viral strain may have been implicated in the nail matrix arrest. Although these authors list HFMD as one of the causes of onychomadesis,^1,2 the number of cases reported was small; however, studies with a larger number of cases and even outbreak have been reported more recently.^3-8 Salazar et al³ reported an onychomadesis outbreak associated with HFMD in Valencia, Spain, in 2008 (N=298). This outbreak primarily was caused by coxsackievirus (CV) A10 (49% of cases).⁵ Another onychomadesis outbreak occurred in Saragossa, Spain, in 2008, and CV B1, B2, and unidentified nonpoliovirus enterovirus were isolated.⁶ Outbreaks also occurred in Finland in 2008, and the causative agents were identified as CV A6 and A10.^7,8 The latency period for onychomadesis following HFMD was 1 to 2 months (mean, 40 days), and the majority of cases occurred in patients younger than 6 years.^1-5 Not all of the nails were involved; in one report, each patient shed only 4 nails on average.⁶

Although there is a definite relationship between HFMD and onychomadesis, the mechanism is still unclear. Some authors claim that nail matrix arrest is caused by high fever¹⁰; however, we found that 40% (2/5)¹ to 63% (10/16)⁴ of reported cases did not have a fever. Additionally, only 1 of our patients had fever. Therefore high fever–induced nail matrix arrest is not a reasonable explanation. Davia et al⁵ observed no relationship between onychomadesis and the severity of HFMD. In addition, no serious complications of HFMD were mentioned in prior reports.

We propose that HFMD-related onychomadesis is caused by the viral infection itself, rather than by severe systemic disease.^1-5,7 Certain viral strains associated with HFMD can induce arrest of nail matrix activity. Osterback et al⁷ detected CV A6 in shed nail fragments and suggested that virus replication damaged the nail matrix and resulted in temporary nail dystrophy. This hypothesis can explain that only some nails, not all, were involved. In our cases, we noted an incomplete and slanted cleft on the thumbnail (Figure 2). We also found that incomplete onychomadesis appeared in the clinical photograph from a prior report.⁵ The slanted cleft in our case may be caused by secondary external force after original incomplete onychomadesis or a different rate of nail regrowth because of different intensity of nail matrix damage. The phenomenon of incomplete onychomadesis in the same nail further suggests the mechanism of onychomadesis following HFMD is localized nail matrix damage.

In conclusion, we report 2 cases of onychomadesis associated with HFMD. Our report highlights that there is no racial difference in post-HFMD onychomadesis. These cases highlight that HFMD is an important cause of onychomadesis, especially in children. We suggest that certain viral strains associated with HFMD may specifically arrest nail matrix growth activity, regardless of fever or disease severity.

To the Editor:

Onychomadesis is characterized by separation of the nail plate from the matrix due to a temporary arrest in nail matrix activity. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is a relatively common viral infection, especially in children. Although the relationship between onychomadesis and HFMD has been noted, there are few reports in the literature.^1-9 We present 2 cases of onychomadesis following HFMD in Taiwanese siblings.

A 3-year-old girl presented with proximal nail plate detachment from the proximal nail fold on the bilateral great toenails (Figure 1) and a transverse whole-thickness sulcus on the bilateral thumbnails (Figure 2) of several weeks’ duration. Her 6-year-old sister had similar nail changes. Hand-foot-and-mouth disease was diagnosed about 4 weeks prior to nail changes. The mother reported that only the younger sister experienced fever. There was no history of notable medication intake, nail trauma, periungual erythema, vesicular lesion, or dermatitis. In both patients, the nail changes were temporary with spontaneous normal nail plate regrowth several months later. A diagnosis of onychomadesis was made.

The etiology of onychomadesis includes drug ingestion, especially chemotherapy; severe systemic diseases; high fever; infection, including viral illnesses such as influenza, measles, and HFMD; and idiopathic onychomadesis.^1,2,5,10 In 2000, Clementz and Mancini¹ reported 5 children with nail matrix arrest following HFMD and suggested an epidemic caused by the same virus strain. Bernier et al² reported another 4 cases and suggested more than one viral strain may have been implicated in the nail matrix arrest. Although these authors list HFMD as one of the causes of onychomadesis,^1,2 the number of cases reported was small; however, studies with a larger number of cases and even outbreak have been reported more recently.^3-8 Salazar et al³ reported an onychomadesis outbreak associated with HFMD in Valencia, Spain, in 2008 (N=298). This outbreak primarily was caused by coxsackievirus (CV) A10 (49% of cases).⁵ Another onychomadesis outbreak occurred in Saragossa, Spain, in 2008, and CV B1, B2, and unidentified nonpoliovirus enterovirus were isolated.⁶ Outbreaks also occurred in Finland in 2008, and the causative agents were identified as CV A6 and A10.^7,8 The latency period for onychomadesis following HFMD was 1 to 2 months (mean, 40 days), and the majority of cases occurred in patients younger than 6 years.^1-5 Not all of the nails were involved; in one report, each patient shed only 4 nails on average.⁶

Although there is a definite relationship between HFMD and onychomadesis, the mechanism is still unclear. Some authors claim that nail matrix arrest is caused by high fever¹⁰; however, we found that 40% (2/5)¹ to 63% (10/16)⁴ of reported cases did not have a fever. Additionally, only 1 of our patients had fever. Therefore high fever–induced nail matrix arrest is not a reasonable explanation. Davia et al⁵ observed no relationship between onychomadesis and the severity of HFMD. In addition, no serious complications of HFMD were mentioned in prior reports.

We propose that HFMD-related onychomadesis is caused by the viral infection itself, rather than by severe systemic disease.^1-5,7 Certain viral strains associated with HFMD can induce arrest of nail matrix activity. Osterback et al⁷ detected CV A6 in shed nail fragments and suggested that virus replication damaged the nail matrix and resulted in temporary nail dystrophy. This hypothesis can explain that only some nails, not all, were involved. In our cases, we noted an incomplete and slanted cleft on the thumbnail (Figure 2). We also found that incomplete onychomadesis appeared in the clinical photograph from a prior report.⁵ The slanted cleft in our case may be caused by secondary external force after original incomplete onychomadesis or a different rate of nail regrowth because of different intensity of nail matrix damage. The phenomenon of incomplete onychomadesis in the same nail further suggests the mechanism of onychomadesis following HFMD is localized nail matrix damage.

In conclusion, we report 2 cases of onychomadesis associated with HFMD. Our report highlights that there is no racial difference in post-HFMD onychomadesis. These cases highlight that HFMD is an important cause of onychomadesis, especially in children. We suggest that certain viral strains associated with HFMD may specifically arrest nail matrix growth activity, regardless of fever or disease severity.

To the Editor:

Dermatofibroma is a common cutaneous lesion that most frequently affects young or middle-aged adults, especially women.¹ Clinically, it appears as a firm, pink or brown nodule. It may be painful or show a tendency for scarring. The pathognomonic feature of dermatofibroma, regarded as a fibrohistiocytic tumor, is the so-called button sign caused by skin depression following pressure. We present a unique case of elongated dermatofibroma with a linear, white, scarlike patch with a brownish pigmented network and globules.

A 40-year-old woman presented with a linear elongated lesion localized to the right side of the infrascapular region of 10 years’ duration. The lesion initially was a small brownish plaque. There was no history of trauma or scratching. Over the next 10 years, the lesion slowly progressed, finally becoming a linear, atrophic, brownish plaque that was 2.5-cm long (Figure 1). The button sign was positive. On dermoscopy the central, elongated, white patch was visualized not as a typical round patch but as a scarlike white line (Figure 2A) surrounded by a brownish network that was especially pronounced in the distal parts of the lesion. In the upper part of the lesion, multiple marginally disseminated, dark brown dots were present. Brownish globules within the linear white patch also were observed in the lower central part. Figure 2B presents a dermoscopic picture of the linear variant of dermatofibroma. For cosmetic reasons, the patient underwent total surgical excision of the lesion. Histopathology revealed distinct characteristics of dermatofibroma (Figures 3A and 3B).

The most common features of dermatofibromas seen in polarized and nonpolarized dermoscopy are central white scarlike patches, brown globulelike structures, vascular structures, and a peripheral fine pigmented network.² Kilinc Karaarslan et al³ described atypical dermatofibromas with linear irregular crypts, which were seen in 26.9% of all studied cases. These irregular crypts were mainly medium in size (10 lesions), with only 2 lesions being tiny and regularly distributed. Only one lesion had atypical clinical and dermoscopic features occurring as an atrophic plaque with multiple small scarlike areas and peripherally distributed pigment network.³ Based on this typology, we believe our patient represents a case of elongated dermatofibroma that could be an atrophic variant of dermatofibroma. This form would not appear as a small scarlike area with pigment network in a somewhat patchy distribution³ but as a scarlike linear chord with a bipolar pigment network. Zaballos et al¹ described 10 dermoscopic patterns of dermatofibroma (N=412); the most common was a central white patch and peripheral pigment network in approximately 35% of cases. A white scarlike patch was observed in 57.0% of dermat-ofibromas in 4 variants: (1) a solitary structure located in the center; (2) multiple white scarlike patches; (3) white scarlike patch extending throughout the lesion or irregularly distributed; and (4) white network (central, total, or irregular).¹ Agero et al² first described the new feature as a central white patch characterized by shiny white streaks. The most frequent dermoscopic pattern associated with dermatofibromas is the central white scarlike patch and peripheral delicate pigment network.^1,4 Arpaia et al⁴ observed that dermoscopic patterns may correspond to distinct sequential stages of the formation of dermatofibroma. The linear character we described may be related to a variant of scarring keloid dermatofibroma.⁵

To the Editor:

Dermatofibroma is a common cutaneous lesion that most frequently affects young or middle-aged adults, especially women.¹ Clinically, it appears as a firm, pink or brown nodule. It may be painful or show a tendency for scarring. The pathognomonic feature of dermatofibroma, regarded as a fibrohistiocytic tumor, is the so-called button sign caused by skin depression following pressure. We present a unique case of elongated dermatofibroma with a linear, white, scarlike patch with a brownish pigmented network and globules.

A 40-year-old woman presented with a linear elongated lesion localized to the right side of the infrascapular region of 10 years’ duration. The lesion initially was a small brownish plaque. There was no history of trauma or scratching. Over the next 10 years, the lesion slowly progressed, finally becoming a linear, atrophic, brownish plaque that was 2.5-cm long (Figure 1). The button sign was positive. On dermoscopy the central, elongated, white patch was visualized not as a typical round patch but as a scarlike white line (Figure 2A) surrounded by a brownish network that was especially pronounced in the distal parts of the lesion. In the upper part of the lesion, multiple marginally disseminated, dark brown dots were present. Brownish globules within the linear white patch also were observed in the lower central part. Figure 2B presents a dermoscopic picture of the linear variant of dermatofibroma. For cosmetic reasons, the patient underwent total surgical excision of the lesion. Histopathology revealed distinct characteristics of dermatofibroma (Figures 3A and 3B).

The most common features of dermatofibromas seen in polarized and nonpolarized dermoscopy are central white scarlike patches, brown globulelike structures, vascular structures, and a peripheral fine pigmented network.² Kilinc Karaarslan et al³ described atypical dermatofibromas with linear irregular crypts, which were seen in 26.9% of all studied cases. These irregular crypts were mainly medium in size (10 lesions), with only 2 lesions being tiny and regularly distributed. Only one lesion had atypical clinical and dermoscopic features occurring as an atrophic plaque with multiple small scarlike areas and peripherally distributed pigment network.³ Based on this typology, we believe our patient represents a case of elongated dermatofibroma that could be an atrophic variant of dermatofibroma. This form would not appear as a small scarlike area with pigment network in a somewhat patchy distribution³ but as a scarlike linear chord with a bipolar pigment network. Zaballos et al¹ described 10 dermoscopic patterns of dermatofibroma (N=412); the most common was a central white patch and peripheral pigment network in approximately 35% of cases. A white scarlike patch was observed in 57.0% of dermat-ofibromas in 4 variants: (1) a solitary structure located in the center; (2) multiple white scarlike patches; (3) white scarlike patch extending throughout the lesion or irregularly distributed; and (4) white network (central, total, or irregular).¹ Agero et al² first described the new feature as a central white patch characterized by shiny white streaks. The most frequent dermoscopic pattern associated with dermatofibromas is the central white scarlike patch and peripheral delicate pigment network.^1,4 Arpaia et al⁴ observed that dermoscopic patterns may correspond to distinct sequential stages of the formation of dermatofibroma. The linear character we described may be related to a variant of scarring keloid dermatofibroma.⁵

To the Editor:

Dermatofibroma is a common cutaneous lesion that most frequently affects young or middle-aged adults, especially women.¹ Clinically, it appears as a firm, pink or brown nodule. It may be painful or show a tendency for scarring. The pathognomonic feature of dermatofibroma, regarded as a fibrohistiocytic tumor, is the so-called button sign caused by skin depression following pressure. We present a unique case of elongated dermatofibroma with a linear, white, scarlike patch with a brownish pigmented network and globules.

A 40-year-old woman presented with a linear elongated lesion localized to the right side of the infrascapular region of 10 years’ duration. The lesion initially was a small brownish plaque. There was no history of trauma or scratching. Over the next 10 years, the lesion slowly progressed, finally becoming a linear, atrophic, brownish plaque that was 2.5-cm long (Figure 1). The button sign was positive. On dermoscopy the central, elongated, white patch was visualized not as a typical round patch but as a scarlike white line (Figure 2A) surrounded by a brownish network that was especially pronounced in the distal parts of the lesion. In the upper part of the lesion, multiple marginally disseminated, dark brown dots were present. Brownish globules within the linear white patch also were observed in the lower central part. Figure 2B presents a dermoscopic picture of the linear variant of dermatofibroma. For cosmetic reasons, the patient underwent total surgical excision of the lesion. Histopathology revealed distinct characteristics of dermatofibroma (Figures 3A and 3B).

The most common features of dermatofibromas seen in polarized and nonpolarized dermoscopy are central white scarlike patches, brown globulelike structures, vascular structures, and a peripheral fine pigmented network.² Kilinc Karaarslan et al³ described atypical dermatofibromas with linear irregular crypts, which were seen in 26.9% of all studied cases. These irregular crypts were mainly medium in size (10 lesions), with only 2 lesions being tiny and regularly distributed. Only one lesion had atypical clinical and dermoscopic features occurring as an atrophic plaque with multiple small scarlike areas and peripherally distributed pigment network.³ Based on this typology, we believe our patient represents a case of elongated dermatofibroma that could be an atrophic variant of dermatofibroma. This form would not appear as a small scarlike area with pigment network in a somewhat patchy distribution³ but as a scarlike linear chord with a bipolar pigment network. Zaballos et al¹ described 10 dermoscopic patterns of dermatofibroma (N=412); the most common was a central white patch and peripheral pigment network in approximately 35% of cases. A white scarlike patch was observed in 57.0% of dermat-ofibromas in 4 variants: (1) a solitary structure located in the center; (2) multiple white scarlike patches; (3) white scarlike patch extending throughout the lesion or irregularly distributed; and (4) white network (central, total, or irregular).¹ Agero et al² first described the new feature as a central white patch characterized by shiny white streaks. The most frequent dermoscopic pattern associated with dermatofibromas is the central white scarlike patch and peripheral delicate pigment network.^1,4 Arpaia et al⁴ observed that dermoscopic patterns may correspond to distinct sequential stages of the formation of dermatofibroma. The linear character we described may be related to a variant of scarring keloid dermatofibroma.⁵

To the Editor:

A 71-year-old woman with hypertension and atrial fibrillation due to thyrotoxicosis was prescribed dabigatran for stroke prevention by her cardiologist. She also was taking pantoprazole, methimazole, and amiodarone at the time of presentation, all managed by her endocrinologist. She had no known drug allergies but reported a remote history of a palmar rash after eating shellfish. She otherwise had never had any problems with her skin and had no family history of psoriasis. She had a history of smoking 50 packs per year but had quit 6 months prior to presentation. After two 150-mg doses of dabigatran, she noticed numerous mildly tender and itchy eruptions on the palmar and plantar surfaces with no associated respiratory, oropharyngeal, or constitutional symptoms. She denied any recent shellfish ingestion. On dermatologic examination, numerous discreet pustules were present on the bilateral palmar and plantar surfaces with minimal erythema of the underlying skin (Figure).

A punch biopsy was taken from a newly forming lesion on the right palm. Histopathology revealed mild hyperkeratosis, spongiosis with lymphocyte exocytosis, intraepidermal vesiculation, and a sparse upper dermal and perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltration. No neutrophils or microabscesses were seen. Staining with periodic acid–Schiff revealed no fungi, and S-100 staining revealed numerous Langerhans cells in the epidermis. Although the skin lesions clinically appeared pustular, the results were consistent with an eczematous drug reaction. Laboratory values, including a complete blood cell count, iron studies, chemistry panels, liver function, thyroid function, and coagulation studies, were remarkable only for mild anemia. The patient declined any topical or systemic skin treatment. Dabigatran was discontinued, and the lesions began to clear immediately thereafter. Dabigatran was not reintroduced. Enoxaparin subsequently was prescribed for anticoagulation. The diagnosis of a drug reaction due to dabigatran was made, which was supported with a score of 7 on the Naranjo scale (0=doubtful; 1–4=possible; 5–8=probable; ≥9=definite) for determining probability of drug-induced adverse reactions.¹ The differential diagnosis for the skin eruption included palmoplantar pustular psoriasis, dyshidrotic eczema, and allergic contact dermatitis, but the clinical history did not support these diagnoses.

Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor used to reduce the risk for stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Based on results of the RE-LY (Randomization Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial published in 2009, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the risk for stroke and systemic emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin (annual risk, 1.11% vs 1.69%; relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.82; P<.001) with the advantage of not requiring frequent monitoring of the international normalized ratio.² The most common adverse effect of dabigatran in this trial was dyspepsia (11.3% vs 5.8%). Drug hypersensitivity, allergic edema, and anaphylaxis were reported in less than 0.1% of patients taking dabigatran.²

According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search terms dabigatran cutaneous reaction and dabigatran rash, 4 case reports of cutaneous eruption due to dabigatran were identified. In one report, a 20-year-old man with atrial fibrillation developed an eruption similar to our patient on the thigh and forearm after 2 weeks of taking oral dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. It resolved without complication after topical corticosteroid use and discontinuation of dabigatran.³ In another report, a 78-year-old man presented to the emergency department after taking two 150-mg doses of dabigatran with a diffuse, full-body, pruritic rash that resolved with oral diphenhydramine and discontinuation of dabigatran.⁴ A third case described a 59-year-old man who was taking 150 mg dabigatran twice daily for 5 days before developing a rash.⁵ The fourth case involved a 74-year-old woman who developed leukocytoclastic vasculitis 1 week after taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.⁶

It is important to monitor for and report hypersensitivity reactions in patients taking dabigatran. Drug exanthems may cause discomfort or even herald more serious hypersensitivity reactions. Patients experiencing these reactions may discontinue therapy without notifying a physician and consequently place themselves at risk for embolism or stroke.

To the Editor:

A 71-year-old woman with hypertension and atrial fibrillation due to thyrotoxicosis was prescribed dabigatran for stroke prevention by her cardiologist. She also was taking pantoprazole, methimazole, and amiodarone at the time of presentation, all managed by her endocrinologist. She had no known drug allergies but reported a remote history of a palmar rash after eating shellfish. She otherwise had never had any problems with her skin and had no family history of psoriasis. She had a history of smoking 50 packs per year but had quit 6 months prior to presentation. After two 150-mg doses of dabigatran, she noticed numerous mildly tender and itchy eruptions on the palmar and plantar surfaces with no associated respiratory, oropharyngeal, or constitutional symptoms. She denied any recent shellfish ingestion. On dermatologic examination, numerous discreet pustules were present on the bilateral palmar and plantar surfaces with minimal erythema of the underlying skin (Figure).

A punch biopsy was taken from a newly forming lesion on the right palm. Histopathology revealed mild hyperkeratosis, spongiosis with lymphocyte exocytosis, intraepidermal vesiculation, and a sparse upper dermal and perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltration. No neutrophils or microabscesses were seen. Staining with periodic acid–Schiff revealed no fungi, and S-100 staining revealed numerous Langerhans cells in the epidermis. Although the skin lesions clinically appeared pustular, the results were consistent with an eczematous drug reaction. Laboratory values, including a complete blood cell count, iron studies, chemistry panels, liver function, thyroid function, and coagulation studies, were remarkable only for mild anemia. The patient declined any topical or systemic skin treatment. Dabigatran was discontinued, and the lesions began to clear immediately thereafter. Dabigatran was not reintroduced. Enoxaparin subsequently was prescribed for anticoagulation. The diagnosis of a drug reaction due to dabigatran was made, which was supported with a score of 7 on the Naranjo scale (0=doubtful; 1–4=possible; 5–8=probable; ≥9=definite) for determining probability of drug-induced adverse reactions.¹ The differential diagnosis for the skin eruption included palmoplantar pustular psoriasis, dyshidrotic eczema, and allergic contact dermatitis, but the clinical history did not support these diagnoses.

Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor used to reduce the risk for stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Based on results of the RE-LY (Randomization Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial published in 2009, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the risk for stroke and systemic emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin (annual risk, 1.11% vs 1.69%; relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.82; P<.001) with the advantage of not requiring frequent monitoring of the international normalized ratio.² The most common adverse effect of dabigatran in this trial was dyspepsia (11.3% vs 5.8%). Drug hypersensitivity, allergic edema, and anaphylaxis were reported in less than 0.1% of patients taking dabigatran.²

According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search terms dabigatran cutaneous reaction and dabigatran rash, 4 case reports of cutaneous eruption due to dabigatran were identified. In one report, a 20-year-old man with atrial fibrillation developed an eruption similar to our patient on the thigh and forearm after 2 weeks of taking oral dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. It resolved without complication after topical corticosteroid use and discontinuation of dabigatran.³ In another report, a 78-year-old man presented to the emergency department after taking two 150-mg doses of dabigatran with a diffuse, full-body, pruritic rash that resolved with oral diphenhydramine and discontinuation of dabigatran.⁴ A third case described a 59-year-old man who was taking 150 mg dabigatran twice daily for 5 days before developing a rash.⁵ The fourth case involved a 74-year-old woman who developed leukocytoclastic vasculitis 1 week after taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.⁶

It is important to monitor for and report hypersensitivity reactions in patients taking dabigatran. Drug exanthems may cause discomfort or even herald more serious hypersensitivity reactions. Patients experiencing these reactions may discontinue therapy without notifying a physician and consequently place themselves at risk for embolism or stroke.

To the Editor:

A 71-year-old woman with hypertension and atrial fibrillation due to thyrotoxicosis was prescribed dabigatran for stroke prevention by her cardiologist. She also was taking pantoprazole, methimazole, and amiodarone at the time of presentation, all managed by her endocrinologist. She had no known drug allergies but reported a remote history of a palmar rash after eating shellfish. She otherwise had never had any problems with her skin and had no family history of psoriasis. She had a history of smoking 50 packs per year but had quit 6 months prior to presentation. After two 150-mg doses of dabigatran, she noticed numerous mildly tender and itchy eruptions on the palmar and plantar surfaces with no associated respiratory, oropharyngeal, or constitutional symptoms. She denied any recent shellfish ingestion. On dermatologic examination, numerous discreet pustules were present on the bilateral palmar and plantar surfaces with minimal erythema of the underlying skin (Figure).

A punch biopsy was taken from a newly forming lesion on the right palm. Histopathology revealed mild hyperkeratosis, spongiosis with lymphocyte exocytosis, intraepidermal vesiculation, and a sparse upper dermal and perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltration. No neutrophils or microabscesses were seen. Staining with periodic acid–Schiff revealed no fungi, and S-100 staining revealed numerous Langerhans cells in the epidermis. Although the skin lesions clinically appeared pustular, the results were consistent with an eczematous drug reaction. Laboratory values, including a complete blood cell count, iron studies, chemistry panels, liver function, thyroid function, and coagulation studies, were remarkable only for mild anemia. The patient declined any topical or systemic skin treatment. Dabigatran was discontinued, and the lesions began to clear immediately thereafter. Dabigatran was not reintroduced. Enoxaparin subsequently was prescribed for anticoagulation. The diagnosis of a drug reaction due to dabigatran was made, which was supported with a score of 7 on the Naranjo scale (0=doubtful; 1–4=possible; 5–8=probable; ≥9=definite) for determining probability of drug-induced adverse reactions.¹ The differential diagnosis for the skin eruption included palmoplantar pustular psoriasis, dyshidrotic eczema, and allergic contact dermatitis, but the clinical history did not support these diagnoses.

Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor used to reduce the risk for stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Based on results of the RE-LY (Randomization Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy) trial published in 2009, dabigatran 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the risk for stroke and systemic emboli in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to warfarin (annual risk, 1.11% vs 1.69%; relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.82; P<.001) with the advantage of not requiring frequent monitoring of the international normalized ratio.² The most common adverse effect of dabigatran in this trial was dyspepsia (11.3% vs 5.8%). Drug hypersensitivity, allergic edema, and anaphylaxis were reported in less than 0.1% of patients taking dabigatran.²

According to a PubMed search of articles indexed for MEDLINE using the search terms dabigatran cutaneous reaction and dabigatran rash, 4 case reports of cutaneous eruption due to dabigatran were identified. In one report, a 20-year-old man with atrial fibrillation developed an eruption similar to our patient on the thigh and forearm after 2 weeks of taking oral dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. It resolved without complication after topical corticosteroid use and discontinuation of dabigatran.³ In another report, a 78-year-old man presented to the emergency department after taking two 150-mg doses of dabigatran with a diffuse, full-body, pruritic rash that resolved with oral diphenhydramine and discontinuation of dabigatran.⁴ A third case described a 59-year-old man who was taking 150 mg dabigatran twice daily for 5 days before developing a rash.⁵ The fourth case involved a 74-year-old woman who developed leukocytoclastic vasculitis 1 week after taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.⁶

It is important to monitor for and report hypersensitivity reactions in patients taking dabigatran. Drug exanthems may cause discomfort or even herald more serious hypersensitivity reactions. Patients experiencing these reactions may discontinue therapy without notifying a physician and consequently place themselves at risk for embolism or stroke.

To the Editor:

Figure 1. A 30-cm pink and violaceous, asymmetric, reticulated patch on the lateral aspect of the right thigh.

Figure 2. Histopathology revealed widely dilated vascular channels containing collections of histiocytes in the superficial dermis with adjacent features of chronic lymphedema (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10) as well as a collection of histiocytes in a dilated lymphatic channel (B)(H&E, original magnification ×40). D2-40 staining demonstrated ectatic lymphatic vessels in the upper dermins (C)(original magnification ×20).

A 70-year-old white man presented with an asymptomatic patch on the lateral aspect of the right thigh of 15 months’ duration. The patient believed the patch correlated with a hip replacement 3 years prior; however, it was 6 inches inferior to the incision site. Physical examination revealed a 30-cm pink and violaceous, asymmetric, reticulated patch (Figure 1). The patch was unresponsive to topical corticosteroids as well as a short course of oral prednisone. The patient’s medical history was notable for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Histopathologic examination revealed widely dilated vascular channels containing collections of histiocytes in the superficial dermis. In addition, adjacent features of chronic lymphedema were present, namely interstitial fibroplasia with dilated lymphatic vessels and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with intralymphatic histiocytosis, a rare disease most commonly associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Our patient did not have a history or clinical symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.

Intralymphatic histiocytosis is a rare cutaneous condition reported by O’Grady et al¹ in 1994. This condition has been most frequently associated with rheumatoid arthritis²; however, there has been an emerging association in patients with orthopedic metal implants, with and without a concomitant diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Cases associated with metal implants are rare.^2-7

The condition presents as asymptomatic red, brown, or violaceous patches, plaques, papules, or nodules that are ill defined and tend to demonstrate a livedo reticularis–like pattern. The lesions typically are overlying or in close proximity to a joint. Histopathologic findings include dilated vascular structures in the reticular dermis, some with empty lumina and others containing collections of mononuclear histiocytes. There also may be an inflammatory infiltrate in the adjacent dermis composed of a mix of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and/or histiocytes. Endothelial cells lining the dilated lumina express immunoreactivity for CD31, CD34, D2-40, Lyve-1, and Prox-1. Intravascular histiocytes are positive for CD68 and CD31.⁶

The pathogenesis of intralymphatic histiocytosis remains undefined. Some hypothesize that intralymphatic histiocytosis could be the early stage of reactive angioendotheliomatosis, as these conditions share clinical and histological features.⁸ Reactive angioendotheliomatosis also is a rare condition that may present as erythematous to violaceous patches or plaques. The lesions are commonly found on the limbs and may be associated with constitutional symptoms. Histologic findings of reactive angioendotheliomatosis include a proliferation of epithelioid, round, or spindle-shaped cells within the lumina of dermal blood vessels, which show positivity for CD31 and CD34.⁹ Others suggest the lesions of intralymphatic histiocytosis arise from lymphangiectasia; obstruction of lymphatic drainage due to congenital abnormalities; or acquired damage from infection, trauma, surgery, or radiation.² Due to the common association with rheumatoid arthritis and orthopedic implants, it is likely that lymphatic stasis secondary to chronic inflammation plays a notable role.

Therapies such as topical and systemic corticosteroids, local radiotherapy, cyclophosphamide, pentoxifylline, and arthrocentesis have been attempted without evidence of efficacy.² Although intralymphatic histiocytosis is chronic and resistant to therapy, patients can be reassured that the condition runs a benign course.

To the Editor:

Figure 1. A 30-cm pink and violaceous, asymmetric, reticulated patch on the lateral aspect of the right thigh.

Figure 2. Histopathology revealed widely dilated vascular channels containing collections of histiocytes in the superficial dermis with adjacent features of chronic lymphedema (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10) as well as a collection of histiocytes in a dilated lymphatic channel (B)(H&E, original magnification ×40). D2-40 staining demonstrated ectatic lymphatic vessels in the upper dermins (C)(original magnification ×20).

A 70-year-old white man presented with an asymptomatic patch on the lateral aspect of the right thigh of 15 months’ duration. The patient believed the patch correlated with a hip replacement 3 years prior; however, it was 6 inches inferior to the incision site. Physical examination revealed a 30-cm pink and violaceous, asymmetric, reticulated patch (Figure 1). The patch was unresponsive to topical corticosteroids as well as a short course of oral prednisone. The patient’s medical history was notable for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Histopathologic examination revealed widely dilated vascular channels containing collections of histiocytes in the superficial dermis. In addition, adjacent features of chronic lymphedema were present, namely interstitial fibroplasia with dilated lymphatic vessels and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with intralymphatic histiocytosis, a rare disease most commonly associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Our patient did not have a history or clinical symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.

Intralymphatic histiocytosis is a rare cutaneous condition reported by O’Grady et al¹ in 1994. This condition has been most frequently associated with rheumatoid arthritis²; however, there has been an emerging association in patients with orthopedic metal implants, with and without a concomitant diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Cases associated with metal implants are rare.^2-7

The condition presents as asymptomatic red, brown, or violaceous patches, plaques, papules, or nodules that are ill defined and tend to demonstrate a livedo reticularis–like pattern. The lesions typically are overlying or in close proximity to a joint. Histopathologic findings include dilated vascular structures in the reticular dermis, some with empty lumina and others containing collections of mononuclear histiocytes. There also may be an inflammatory infiltrate in the adjacent dermis composed of a mix of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and/or histiocytes. Endothelial cells lining the dilated lumina express immunoreactivity for CD31, CD34, D2-40, Lyve-1, and Prox-1. Intravascular histiocytes are positive for CD68 and CD31.⁶

The pathogenesis of intralymphatic histiocytosis remains undefined. Some hypothesize that intralymphatic histiocytosis could be the early stage of reactive angioendotheliomatosis, as these conditions share clinical and histological features.⁸ Reactive angioendotheliomatosis also is a rare condition that may present as erythematous to violaceous patches or plaques. The lesions are commonly found on the limbs and may be associated with constitutional symptoms. Histologic findings of reactive angioendotheliomatosis include a proliferation of epithelioid, round, or spindle-shaped cells within the lumina of dermal blood vessels, which show positivity for CD31 and CD34.⁹ Others suggest the lesions of intralymphatic histiocytosis arise from lymphangiectasia; obstruction of lymphatic drainage due to congenital abnormalities; or acquired damage from infection, trauma, surgery, or radiation.² Due to the common association with rheumatoid arthritis and orthopedic implants, it is likely that lymphatic stasis secondary to chronic inflammation plays a notable role.

Therapies such as topical and systemic corticosteroids, local radiotherapy, cyclophosphamide, pentoxifylline, and arthrocentesis have been attempted without evidence of efficacy.² Although intralymphatic histiocytosis is chronic and resistant to therapy, patients can be reassured that the condition runs a benign course.

To the Editor:

Figure 1. A 30-cm pink and violaceous, asymmetric, reticulated patch on the lateral aspect of the right thigh.

Figure 2. Histopathology revealed widely dilated vascular channels containing collections of histiocytes in the superficial dermis with adjacent features of chronic lymphedema (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10) as well as a collection of histiocytes in a dilated lymphatic channel (B)(H&E, original magnification ×40). D2-40 staining demonstrated ectatic lymphatic vessels in the upper dermins (C)(original magnification ×20).

A 70-year-old white man presented with an asymptomatic patch on the lateral aspect of the right thigh of 15 months’ duration. The patient believed the patch correlated with a hip replacement 3 years prior; however, it was 6 inches inferior to the incision site. Physical examination revealed a 30-cm pink and violaceous, asymmetric, reticulated patch (Figure 1). The patch was unresponsive to topical corticosteroids as well as a short course of oral prednisone. The patient’s medical history was notable for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Histopathologic examination revealed widely dilated vascular channels containing collections of histiocytes in the superficial dermis. In addition, adjacent features of chronic lymphedema were present, namely interstitial fibroplasia with dilated lymphatic vessels and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (Figure 2). These findings were consistent with intralymphatic histiocytosis, a rare disease most commonly associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Our patient did not have a history or clinical symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis.

Intralymphatic histiocytosis is a rare cutaneous condition reported by O’Grady et al¹ in 1994. This condition has been most frequently associated with rheumatoid arthritis²; however, there has been an emerging association in patients with orthopedic metal implants, with and without a concomitant diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Cases associated with metal implants are rare.^2-7

The condition presents as asymptomatic red, brown, or violaceous patches, plaques, papules, or nodules that are ill defined and tend to demonstrate a livedo reticularis–like pattern. The lesions typically are overlying or in close proximity to a joint. Histopathologic findings include dilated vascular structures in the reticular dermis, some with empty lumina and others containing collections of mononuclear histiocytes. There also may be an inflammatory infiltrate in the adjacent dermis composed of a mix of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and/or histiocytes. Endothelial cells lining the dilated lumina express immunoreactivity for CD31, CD34, D2-40, Lyve-1, and Prox-1. Intravascular histiocytes are positive for CD68 and CD31.⁶

The pathogenesis of intralymphatic histiocytosis remains undefined. Some hypothesize that intralymphatic histiocytosis could be the early stage of reactive angioendotheliomatosis, as these conditions share clinical and histological features.⁸ Reactive angioendotheliomatosis also is a rare condition that may present as erythematous to violaceous patches or plaques. The lesions are commonly found on the limbs and may be associated with constitutional symptoms. Histologic findings of reactive angioendotheliomatosis include a proliferation of epithelioid, round, or spindle-shaped cells within the lumina of dermal blood vessels, which show positivity for CD31 and CD34.⁹ Others suggest the lesions of intralymphatic histiocytosis arise from lymphangiectasia; obstruction of lymphatic drainage due to congenital abnormalities; or acquired damage from infection, trauma, surgery, or radiation.² Due to the common association with rheumatoid arthritis and orthopedic implants, it is likely that lymphatic stasis secondary to chronic inflammation plays a notable role.

Therapies such as topical and systemic corticosteroids, local radiotherapy, cyclophosphamide, pentoxifylline, and arthrocentesis have been attempted without evidence of efficacy.² Although intralymphatic histiocytosis is chronic and resistant to therapy, patients can be reassured that the condition runs a benign course.

To the Editor:
Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology that most commonly affects the anogenital region. Progressive sclerosis results in scarring with distortion of the normal epithelial architecture.^1,2 The lifetime risk for developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) as a complication of long-standing LS has been estimated as 4% to 6%.^3,4 However, there is no general agreement concerning the exact relationship between anogenital LS and SCC.¹ The coexistence of histologic findings of LS, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), and SCC in the same tissue is rare. We report a case of VIN and SCC developing in a region of preexisting LS.

A 76-year-old woman presented with a 7-mm nodule on the clitoris that was surrounded by a pearly white, smooth, glistening area (Figure 1). The patient reported pain and tenderness associated with the nodule. No regional lymphadenopathy was evident. We performed an excisional biopsy of the entire nodule and a small part of the whitish patch (Figure 2A). On histologic examination, the presence of hyperkeratosis, epidermal atrophy, a swollen dermal collagen bundle, and prominent edema was consistent with LS (Figure 2B). The presence of dysplastic changes with mild disturbance of the epithelial architecture as well as acanthosis and dyskeratosis in the same tissue confirmed VIN (Figure 2C). Dermal invasion and transition to SCC were seen in the part of the tissue verified as VIN. The presence of dermal tumor nests and an irregular border between the epidermis and dermis pointed to the existence of fully developed SCC (Figure 2D). To prevent the recurrence of SCC, the patient returned for follow-up periodically. There was no recurrence within 6 months after excision.

Figure 2. An excisional biopsy showed epidermal thinning on the left side and invasion of the dermis by a tumor nest on the right side (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). Left, center, and right boxes indicate areas shown in Figures 2B, 2C and 2D, respectively. Hyperkeratosis, epidermal atrophy, a swollen dermal collagen bundle, and prominent edema was evident (B)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Dysplactic changes with mild disturbance of the epithelial architecture accompanied by acanthosis and nuclear atypia were seen (C)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Irregular masses of atypical squamous cells spread downward into the dermis representing squamous cell carcinoma of a well-differentiated type (D)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

Although LS is considered a premalignant condition, only a small portion of patients with LS ultimately develop vulvar SCC.⁵ There are a number of reasons for linking LS with the development of vulvar SCC. First, in the majority of cases of vulvar SCC, LS, squamous cell hyperplasia, or VIN is present in the adjacent epithelium. Lichen sclerosus is found in adjacent regions in up to 62% of vulvar SCC cases.⁶ Second, patients with LS may develop vulvar SCC, as frequently reported. Third, in a series of LS patients who underwent long-term follow-up, 4% to 6% were reported to have developed vulvar SCC.^3,4,7

Lichen sclerosus is an inflammatory dermatosis characterized by clinicopathologic persistence and hypocellular fibrosis.² Changes in the local environment of the keratinocyte, including chronic inflammation and sclerosis, may be responsible for the promotion of carcinogenesis.⁸ However, no molecular markers have been proven to identify the LS lesions that are at risk for developing into vulvar SCC.^9,10 It has been suggested that VIN is the direct precursor of vulvar SCC.^11,12

Histologic diagnosis of VIN is difficult. Its identification is hindered by a high degree of cellular differentiation combined with the absence of widespread architectural disorder, nuclear pleomorphism, and diffuse nuclear atypia.¹³ The atypia in VIN lesions is strictly confined to the basal and parabasal layers of the epithelium.¹¹ Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia has seldom been diagnosed as a solitary lesion because it appears to have a short intraepithelial lifetime.

Vulvar SCC can be divided into 2 patterns. The first is found in older women, which is unrelated to human papillomavirus (HPV). This type occurs in a background of LS and/or differentiated VIN. The second is predominantly found in younger women, which is related to high-risk HPV. This type of vulvar SCC frequently is associated with the histologic subtypes of warty and basaloid differentiations and is referred to as undifferentiated VIN. There is no association with LS in these cases.^2,14,15

It has been suggested that LS and HPV may not be mutually exclusive but may act as cofactors in SCC pathogenesis.¹⁶ Infection with HPV is an early event in the multistep process of vulvar carcinogenesis, and HPV integration into host cell genome seems to be related to the progression of vulvar dysplasia.¹⁷ Viral integration generally disrupts the E2 region, resulting in enhanced expression of E6 and E7. E6 and E7 have the ability to bind and inactivate the protein p53 and retinoblastoma protein, which promotes rapid progression through the cell cycle without p53-mediated control of DNA integrity.¹⁸ However, the exact influence of HPV in vulvar SCC is uncertain, as divergent prevalence rates have been published.

In our case, histologic examination revealed the characteristic findings of LS, VIN, and SCC in succession. This sequence is evidence of progressive transition from LS to VIN and then to SCC. Consequently, this case suggests that vulvar LS may act as both an initiator and a promoter of carcinogenesis and that VIN may be the direct precursor of vulvar SCC. In conclusion, LS has a considerable risk for malignant transformation and requires continuous follow-up in all patients. Early histological detection of invasive lesions is crucial to reduce the risk for vulvar cancer.

To the Editor:
Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology that most commonly affects the anogenital region. Progressive sclerosis results in scarring with distortion of the normal epithelial architecture.^1,2 The lifetime risk for developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) as a complication of long-standing LS has been estimated as 4% to 6%.^3,4 However, there is no general agreement concerning the exact relationship between anogenital LS and SCC.¹ The coexistence of histologic findings of LS, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), and SCC in the same tissue is rare. We report a case of VIN and SCC developing in a region of preexisting LS.

A 76-year-old woman presented with a 7-mm nodule on the clitoris that was surrounded by a pearly white, smooth, glistening area (Figure 1). The patient reported pain and tenderness associated with the nodule. No regional lymphadenopathy was evident. We performed an excisional biopsy of the entire nodule and a small part of the whitish patch (Figure 2A). On histologic examination, the presence of hyperkeratosis, epidermal atrophy, a swollen dermal collagen bundle, and prominent edema was consistent with LS (Figure 2B). The presence of dysplastic changes with mild disturbance of the epithelial architecture as well as acanthosis and dyskeratosis in the same tissue confirmed VIN (Figure 2C). Dermal invasion and transition to SCC were seen in the part of the tissue verified as VIN. The presence of dermal tumor nests and an irregular border between the epidermis and dermis pointed to the existence of fully developed SCC (Figure 2D). To prevent the recurrence of SCC, the patient returned for follow-up periodically. There was no recurrence within 6 months after excision.

Figure 2. An excisional biopsy showed epidermal thinning on the left side and invasion of the dermis by a tumor nest on the right side (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). Left, center, and right boxes indicate areas shown in Figures 2B, 2C and 2D, respectively. Hyperkeratosis, epidermal atrophy, a swollen dermal collagen bundle, and prominent edema was evident (B)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Dysplactic changes with mild disturbance of the epithelial architecture accompanied by acanthosis and nuclear atypia were seen (C)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Irregular masses of atypical squamous cells spread downward into the dermis representing squamous cell carcinoma of a well-differentiated type (D)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

Although LS is considered a premalignant condition, only a small portion of patients with LS ultimately develop vulvar SCC.⁵ There are a number of reasons for linking LS with the development of vulvar SCC. First, in the majority of cases of vulvar SCC, LS, squamous cell hyperplasia, or VIN is present in the adjacent epithelium. Lichen sclerosus is found in adjacent regions in up to 62% of vulvar SCC cases.⁶ Second, patients with LS may develop vulvar SCC, as frequently reported. Third, in a series of LS patients who underwent long-term follow-up, 4% to 6% were reported to have developed vulvar SCC.^3,4,7

Lichen sclerosus is an inflammatory dermatosis characterized by clinicopathologic persistence and hypocellular fibrosis.² Changes in the local environment of the keratinocyte, including chronic inflammation and sclerosis, may be responsible for the promotion of carcinogenesis.⁸ However, no molecular markers have been proven to identify the LS lesions that are at risk for developing into vulvar SCC.^9,10 It has been suggested that VIN is the direct precursor of vulvar SCC.^11,12

Histologic diagnosis of VIN is difficult. Its identification is hindered by a high degree of cellular differentiation combined with the absence of widespread architectural disorder, nuclear pleomorphism, and diffuse nuclear atypia.¹³ The atypia in VIN lesions is strictly confined to the basal and parabasal layers of the epithelium.¹¹ Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia has seldom been diagnosed as a solitary lesion because it appears to have a short intraepithelial lifetime.

Vulvar SCC can be divided into 2 patterns. The first is found in older women, which is unrelated to human papillomavirus (HPV). This type occurs in a background of LS and/or differentiated VIN. The second is predominantly found in younger women, which is related to high-risk HPV. This type of vulvar SCC frequently is associated with the histologic subtypes of warty and basaloid differentiations and is referred to as undifferentiated VIN. There is no association with LS in these cases.^2,14,15

It has been suggested that LS and HPV may not be mutually exclusive but may act as cofactors in SCC pathogenesis.¹⁶ Infection with HPV is an early event in the multistep process of vulvar carcinogenesis, and HPV integration into host cell genome seems to be related to the progression of vulvar dysplasia.¹⁷ Viral integration generally disrupts the E2 region, resulting in enhanced expression of E6 and E7. E6 and E7 have the ability to bind and inactivate the protein p53 and retinoblastoma protein, which promotes rapid progression through the cell cycle without p53-mediated control of DNA integrity.¹⁸ However, the exact influence of HPV in vulvar SCC is uncertain, as divergent prevalence rates have been published.

In our case, histologic examination revealed the characteristic findings of LS, VIN, and SCC in succession. This sequence is evidence of progressive transition from LS to VIN and then to SCC. Consequently, this case suggests that vulvar LS may act as both an initiator and a promoter of carcinogenesis and that VIN may be the direct precursor of vulvar SCC. In conclusion, LS has a considerable risk for malignant transformation and requires continuous follow-up in all patients. Early histological detection of invasive lesions is crucial to reduce the risk for vulvar cancer.

To the Editor:
Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology that most commonly affects the anogenital region. Progressive sclerosis results in scarring with distortion of the normal epithelial architecture.^1,2 The lifetime risk for developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) as a complication of long-standing LS has been estimated as 4% to 6%.^3,4 However, there is no general agreement concerning the exact relationship between anogenital LS and SCC.¹ The coexistence of histologic findings of LS, vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN), and SCC in the same tissue is rare. We report a case of VIN and SCC developing in a region of preexisting LS.

A 76-year-old woman presented with a 7-mm nodule on the clitoris that was surrounded by a pearly white, smooth, glistening area (Figure 1). The patient reported pain and tenderness associated with the nodule. No regional lymphadenopathy was evident. We performed an excisional biopsy of the entire nodule and a small part of the whitish patch (Figure 2A). On histologic examination, the presence of hyperkeratosis, epidermal atrophy, a swollen dermal collagen bundle, and prominent edema was consistent with LS (Figure 2B). The presence of dysplastic changes with mild disturbance of the epithelial architecture as well as acanthosis and dyskeratosis in the same tissue confirmed VIN (Figure 2C). Dermal invasion and transition to SCC were seen in the part of the tissue verified as VIN. The presence of dermal tumor nests and an irregular border between the epidermis and dermis pointed to the existence of fully developed SCC (Figure 2D). To prevent the recurrence of SCC, the patient returned for follow-up periodically. There was no recurrence within 6 months after excision.

Figure 2. An excisional biopsy showed epidermal thinning on the left side and invasion of the dermis by a tumor nest on the right side (A)(H&E, original magnification ×10). Left, center, and right boxes indicate areas shown in Figures 2B, 2C and 2D, respectively. Hyperkeratosis, epidermal atrophy, a swollen dermal collagen bundle, and prominent edema was evident (B)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Dysplactic changes with mild disturbance of the epithelial architecture accompanied by acanthosis and nuclear atypia were seen (C)(H&E, original magnification ×200). Irregular masses of atypical squamous cells spread downward into the dermis representing squamous cell carcinoma of a well-differentiated type (D)(H&E, original magnification ×200).

Although LS is considered a premalignant condition, only a small portion of patients with LS ultimately develop vulvar SCC.⁵ There are a number of reasons for linking LS with the development of vulvar SCC. First, in the majority of cases of vulvar SCC, LS, squamous cell hyperplasia, or VIN is present in the adjacent epithelium. Lichen sclerosus is found in adjacent regions in up to 62% of vulvar SCC cases.⁶ Second, patients with LS may develop vulvar SCC, as frequently reported. Third, in a series of LS patients who underwent long-term follow-up, 4% to 6% were reported to have developed vulvar SCC.^3,4,7

Lichen sclerosus is an inflammatory dermatosis characterized by clinicopathologic persistence and hypocellular fibrosis.² Changes in the local environment of the keratinocyte, including chronic inflammation and sclerosis, may be responsible for the promotion of carcinogenesis.⁸ However, no molecular markers have been proven to identify the LS lesions that are at risk for developing into vulvar SCC.^9,10 It has been suggested that VIN is the direct precursor of vulvar SCC.^11,12

Histologic diagnosis of VIN is difficult. Its identification is hindered by a high degree of cellular differentiation combined with the absence of widespread architectural disorder, nuclear pleomorphism, and diffuse nuclear atypia.¹³ The atypia in VIN lesions is strictly confined to the basal and parabasal layers of the epithelium.¹¹ Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia has seldom been diagnosed as a solitary lesion because it appears to have a short intraepithelial lifetime.

Vulvar SCC can be divided into 2 patterns. The first is found in older women, which is unrelated to human papillomavirus (HPV). This type occurs in a background of LS and/or differentiated VIN. The second is predominantly found in younger women, which is related to high-risk HPV. This type of vulvar SCC frequently is associated with the histologic subtypes of warty and basaloid differentiations and is referred to as undifferentiated VIN. There is no association with LS in these cases.^2,14,15

It has been suggested that LS and HPV may not be mutually exclusive but may act as cofactors in SCC pathogenesis.¹⁶ Infection with HPV is an early event in the multistep process of vulvar carcinogenesis, and HPV integration into host cell genome seems to be related to the progression of vulvar dysplasia.¹⁷ Viral integration generally disrupts the E2 region, resulting in enhanced expression of E6 and E7. E6 and E7 have the ability to bind and inactivate the protein p53 and retinoblastoma protein, which promotes rapid progression through the cell cycle without p53-mediated control of DNA integrity.¹⁸ However, the exact influence of HPV in vulvar SCC is uncertain, as divergent prevalence rates have been published.

In our case, histologic examination revealed the characteristic findings of LS, VIN, and SCC in succession. This sequence is evidence of progressive transition from LS to VIN and then to SCC. Consequently, this case suggests that vulvar LS may act as both an initiator and a promoter of carcinogenesis and that VIN may be the direct precursor of vulvar SCC. In conclusion, LS has a considerable risk for malignant transformation and requires continuous follow-up in all patients. Early histological detection of invasive lesions is crucial to reduce the risk for vulvar cancer.

To the Editor:

The term pemphigus describes a group of autoimmune blistering diseases that are histologically characterized by intraepidermal blisters caused by acantholysis. There are several types of pemphigus foliaceus, such as classic and endemic pemphigus foliaceus, pemphigus erythematosus, pemphigus herpetiformis, and drug-induced pemphigus foliaceus.¹

Figure 1. Multiple erosions and crusted lesions were present on the back.

Figure 2. Subcorneal bulla containing acantholytic keratinocytes and neutrophils (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Drug-induced pemphigus foliaceus in patients treated with penicillamine for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well documented in the literature.² An association between pemphigus foliaceus and RA without penicillamine therapy is rare. We present a case of a patient with a history of RA who developed this bullous disease.

A 67-year-old woman with a 15-year history of seropositive RA presented with widespread skin lesions of 4 weeks’ duration. Confluent scaly crusted erosions on an erythematous base were present on the back (Figure 1), chest, and abdomen. There was no alteration of the mucous membranes. Medical treatment consisted of methotrexate (10 mg weekly), folic acid (5 mg twice weekly), prednisolone (5 mg daily), and ketoprofen (50 mg daily). Routine blood analysis was unremarkable, except for a positive rheumatoid factor. Histologic examination showed a subcorneal bulla containing acantholytic keratinocytes and neutrophils. There was a mild lymphocytic and eosinophilic infiltrate in the papillary dermis (Figure 2).

Determination of anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibodies was performed by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Desmoglein 1 antibodies were positive with titers of 30 U/mL (positive, ≥20 U/mL), whereas desmoglein 3 antibody was negative. Thus, a diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus was established. The polymerase chain reaction ligation-based typing method and the nucleotide sequence was used to examine the protein drought-repressed 4 gene complex, DR4, which tested positive.

Based on a diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus, the patient’s corticosteroid treatment was changed from 5 mg daily of prednisolone to 40 mg daily of methylprednisolone, leading to marked improvement of the cutaneous lesions. After tapering the steroid dosage over a period of 3 months, no relapse occurred.

Pemphigus foliaceus is a rare autoimmune blistering disease. It can be induced by drugs, such as penicillamine and captopril.^2,3 Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is closely related to penicillamine structurally. Both drugs have highly active thiol groups capable of reducing disulfide bonds and inducing acantholysis.⁴ The drugs taken by our patient typically are not known to induce pemphigus foliaceus.

The association of pemphigus foliaceus with RA in the absence of penicillamine therapy was first described by Wilkinson et al.⁴ Since then, additional cases have been published.^5,6 Pemphigus foliaceus also has been described with other autoimmune conditions such as autoimmune thyroid disease.⁷

Rheumatoid arthritis has been genetically linked to the HLA-DR4 gene complex, which also was found in our patient. Patients with pemphigus foliaceus and RA have an increased frequency of the class II major histocompatibility complex, serologically defined HLA-DR4, and HLA-DRw6 haplotypes.⁴ Therefore, we believe that the association of pemphigus foliaceus and RA in our patient might not be fortuitous.

To the Editor:

The term pemphigus describes a group of autoimmune blistering diseases that are histologically characterized by intraepidermal blisters caused by acantholysis. There are several types of pemphigus foliaceus, such as classic and endemic pemphigus foliaceus, pemphigus erythematosus, pemphigus herpetiformis, and drug-induced pemphigus foliaceus.¹

Figure 1. Multiple erosions and crusted lesions were present on the back.

Figure 2. Subcorneal bulla containing acantholytic keratinocytes and neutrophils (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Drug-induced pemphigus foliaceus in patients treated with penicillamine for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well documented in the literature.² An association between pemphigus foliaceus and RA without penicillamine therapy is rare. We present a case of a patient with a history of RA who developed this bullous disease.

A 67-year-old woman with a 15-year history of seropositive RA presented with widespread skin lesions of 4 weeks’ duration. Confluent scaly crusted erosions on an erythematous base were present on the back (Figure 1), chest, and abdomen. There was no alteration of the mucous membranes. Medical treatment consisted of methotrexate (10 mg weekly), folic acid (5 mg twice weekly), prednisolone (5 mg daily), and ketoprofen (50 mg daily). Routine blood analysis was unremarkable, except for a positive rheumatoid factor. Histologic examination showed a subcorneal bulla containing acantholytic keratinocytes and neutrophils. There was a mild lymphocytic and eosinophilic infiltrate in the papillary dermis (Figure 2).

Determination of anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibodies was performed by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Desmoglein 1 antibodies were positive with titers of 30 U/mL (positive, ≥20 U/mL), whereas desmoglein 3 antibody was negative. Thus, a diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus was established. The polymerase chain reaction ligation-based typing method and the nucleotide sequence was used to examine the protein drought-repressed 4 gene complex, DR4, which tested positive.

Based on a diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus, the patient’s corticosteroid treatment was changed from 5 mg daily of prednisolone to 40 mg daily of methylprednisolone, leading to marked improvement of the cutaneous lesions. After tapering the steroid dosage over a period of 3 months, no relapse occurred.

Pemphigus foliaceus is a rare autoimmune blistering disease. It can be induced by drugs, such as penicillamine and captopril.^2,3 Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is closely related to penicillamine structurally. Both drugs have highly active thiol groups capable of reducing disulfide bonds and inducing acantholysis.⁴ The drugs taken by our patient typically are not known to induce pemphigus foliaceus.

The association of pemphigus foliaceus with RA in the absence of penicillamine therapy was first described by Wilkinson et al.⁴ Since then, additional cases have been published.^5,6 Pemphigus foliaceus also has been described with other autoimmune conditions such as autoimmune thyroid disease.⁷

Rheumatoid arthritis has been genetically linked to the HLA-DR4 gene complex, which also was found in our patient. Patients with pemphigus foliaceus and RA have an increased frequency of the class II major histocompatibility complex, serologically defined HLA-DR4, and HLA-DRw6 haplotypes.⁴ Therefore, we believe that the association of pemphigus foliaceus and RA in our patient might not be fortuitous.

To the Editor:

The term pemphigus describes a group of autoimmune blistering diseases that are histologically characterized by intraepidermal blisters caused by acantholysis. There are several types of pemphigus foliaceus, such as classic and endemic pemphigus foliaceus, pemphigus erythematosus, pemphigus herpetiformis, and drug-induced pemphigus foliaceus.¹

Figure 1. Multiple erosions and crusted lesions were present on the back.

Figure 2. Subcorneal bulla containing acantholytic keratinocytes and neutrophils (H&E, original magnification ×100).

Drug-induced pemphigus foliaceus in patients treated with penicillamine for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is well documented in the literature.² An association between pemphigus foliaceus and RA without penicillamine therapy is rare. We present a case of a patient with a history of RA who developed this bullous disease.

A 67-year-old woman with a 15-year history of seropositive RA presented with widespread skin lesions of 4 weeks’ duration. Confluent scaly crusted erosions on an erythematous base were present on the back (Figure 1), chest, and abdomen. There was no alteration of the mucous membranes. Medical treatment consisted of methotrexate (10 mg weekly), folic acid (5 mg twice weekly), prednisolone (5 mg daily), and ketoprofen (50 mg daily). Routine blood analysis was unremarkable, except for a positive rheumatoid factor. Histologic examination showed a subcorneal bulla containing acantholytic keratinocytes and neutrophils. There was a mild lymphocytic and eosinophilic infiltrate in the papillary dermis (Figure 2).

Determination of anti-desmoglein 1 and 3 antibodies was performed by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Desmoglein 1 antibodies were positive with titers of 30 U/mL (positive, ≥20 U/mL), whereas desmoglein 3 antibody was negative. Thus, a diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus was established. The polymerase chain reaction ligation-based typing method and the nucleotide sequence was used to examine the protein drought-repressed 4 gene complex, DR4, which tested positive.

Based on a diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus, the patient’s corticosteroid treatment was changed from 5 mg daily of prednisolone to 40 mg daily of methylprednisolone, leading to marked improvement of the cutaneous lesions. After tapering the steroid dosage over a period of 3 months, no relapse occurred.

Pemphigus foliaceus is a rare autoimmune blistering disease. It can be induced by drugs, such as penicillamine and captopril.^2,3 Captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, is closely related to penicillamine structurally. Both drugs have highly active thiol groups capable of reducing disulfide bonds and inducing acantholysis.⁴ The drugs taken by our patient typically are not known to induce pemphigus foliaceus.

The association of pemphigus foliaceus with RA in the absence of penicillamine therapy was first described by Wilkinson et al.⁴ Since then, additional cases have been published.^5,6 Pemphigus foliaceus also has been described with other autoimmune conditions such as autoimmune thyroid disease.⁷

Rheumatoid arthritis has been genetically linked to the HLA-DR4 gene complex, which also was found in our patient. Patients with pemphigus foliaceus and RA have an increased frequency of the class II major histocompatibility complex, serologically defined HLA-DR4, and HLA-DRw6 haplotypes.⁴ Therefore, we believe that the association of pemphigus foliaceus and RA in our patient might not be fortuitous.

To the Editor:

Infections caused by herpes simplex (HS) and herpes zoster (HZ) usually can be recognized by clinical findings; however, laboratory confirmation sometimes is required. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory tests detect HS or HZ in a sensible and specific manner. New PCR systems such as real-time PCR (RT-PCR) give faster and more precise results. We report a case of recurrent concomitant HZ and HS diagnosed by RT-PCR.

A 62-year-old woman presented with recurrent painful cutaneous lesions on the left buttock and thigh of 9 years’ duration. This eruption was preceded by a burning sensation of 1 week’s duration that extended toward the heel. Cutaneous lesions normally were sparse and persisted for a few days. She also had annular erythematous lesions of 3 years’ duration on the upper trunk and shoulders after sun exposure. On physical examination, an atrophic hypopigmented patch was seen with a few vesicles located on the thigh. Whitish atrophic patches also were found in a linear distribution on the left buttock and thigh (Figure).

Laboratory results included the following: antinuclear antibody, 1:400 on a nuclear dotted pattern; extractable nuclear antigens (anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52) were positive (reference range, >15); and rheumatoid factor was 24.1 U/mL (reference range, 0–15 U/mL). The patient did not meet any other American College of Rheumatology criteria^1,2 of systemic lupus erythematosus apart from photosensitivity. The rest of the analysis—complete blood cell count, liver enzymes, and biochemistry—was normal or negative. Human immunodeficiency virus, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HHV-1 and HHV-2), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) IgM serologies were negative, whereas IgG VZV serology was positive.

The microbiological study via swab obtained from the roof and fluid from the vesicles showed an indeterminate result from the rapid direct antigen detection with immunofluorescent antibodies. Viral cultures were HHV-2 positive and VZV negative. Conventional PCR showed positive results, both for HHV-2 and VZV. A second analysis, performed with RT-PCR from a new sample taken 2 months later, showed the same results, which led to the diagnosis of recurrent concomitant HS and HZ with a recurrent HZ clinical pattern. The patient was started on valacyclovir 1 g daily, and the number and intensity of flares diminished in the months following treatment.

Concomitant HS and HZ on the same dermatome has been described in the literature.^3,4 In a retrospective series of 20 immunocompetent patients, HZ was the main presumed diagnosis before laboratory confirmation of diagnosis, and only 1 case corresponded to recurrent HZ.³ Other cases of simultaneous HS and HZ have been described, but they did not occur on the same dermatome. Half of these reported cases were in immunosuppressed patients.^5,6

The recurrent nature of HS is well known; however, recurrent cases of HZ are rare. Nevertheless, in a population-based cohort study of patients with a confirmed prior episode of HZ (N=1669), recurrences were found in 6% of patients.⁷ Recurrence was more common if the patient was immunosuppressed, was female and 50 years or older, and had pain for more than 30 days.⁷

The recurrence rate was high in our case, but no immunosuppressive factor could be found apart from probable subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Systemic lupus erythematosus has been associated with a high risk for developing HZ secondary to cell-mediated immunosuppression. The annual incidence of HZ can reach 32 of 1000 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, while in the general population the incidence is only 1.5 to 3 of 1000 patients.^8-10

Direct detection of antigens of HS and HZ is a fast and inexpensive technique but lacks the sensitivity of viral cultures. Viral cultures used to be considered the gold standard; however, they are less sensitive than PCR.¹¹ Furthermore, VZV detection is more difficult than HS, leading to a notable percentage of false-negative results.¹² Polymerase chain reaction is a fast, reliable, and sensitive laboratory technique. Real-time PCR permits faster results than conventional PCR, specifically for HHV-1, HHV-2, and HZ detection. It also has minimal risk for contamination.^13,14 In our opinion, PCR should be the gold standard instead of viral cultures. It has proven its superiority as a rapid method for detection, it is the most sensitive test, it is easier to perform, and it is cost effective (Table).^11,15-19 However, viral cultures can allow sensitivity testing and are still an option for determination of susceptibility to antivirals.

In our case, a false-positive was excluded because no sign of possible contamination was found, repeated internal analysis from the same sample confirmed the results, and a new analysis from a new flare showed the same results 2 months later. However, we cannot rule out that the positivity for HZ of the second sample was due to the high sensitivity of the test and a virus latency in nerves.

We propose the use of PCR as a method of choice. Presumably more cases of recurrent HZ and concomitant HS and HZ will be seen with PCR use. In the case of a concomitant infection of HS and HZ, it is reasonable to use an antiviral dosage as in HZ treatment. No literature regarding outcomes from therapy could be found.

To the Editor:

Infections caused by herpes simplex (HS) and herpes zoster (HZ) usually can be recognized by clinical findings; however, laboratory confirmation sometimes is required. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory tests detect HS or HZ in a sensible and specific manner. New PCR systems such as real-time PCR (RT-PCR) give faster and more precise results. We report a case of recurrent concomitant HZ and HS diagnosed by RT-PCR.

A 62-year-old woman presented with recurrent painful cutaneous lesions on the left buttock and thigh of 9 years’ duration. This eruption was preceded by a burning sensation of 1 week’s duration that extended toward the heel. Cutaneous lesions normally were sparse and persisted for a few days. She also had annular erythematous lesions of 3 years’ duration on the upper trunk and shoulders after sun exposure. On physical examination, an atrophic hypopigmented patch was seen with a few vesicles located on the thigh. Whitish atrophic patches also were found in a linear distribution on the left buttock and thigh (Figure).

Laboratory results included the following: antinuclear antibody, 1:400 on a nuclear dotted pattern; extractable nuclear antigens (anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52) were positive (reference range, >15); and rheumatoid factor was 24.1 U/mL (reference range, 0–15 U/mL). The patient did not meet any other American College of Rheumatology criteria^1,2 of systemic lupus erythematosus apart from photosensitivity. The rest of the analysis—complete blood cell count, liver enzymes, and biochemistry—was normal or negative. Human immunodeficiency virus, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HHV-1 and HHV-2), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) IgM serologies were negative, whereas IgG VZV serology was positive.

The microbiological study via swab obtained from the roof and fluid from the vesicles showed an indeterminate result from the rapid direct antigen detection with immunofluorescent antibodies. Viral cultures were HHV-2 positive and VZV negative. Conventional PCR showed positive results, both for HHV-2 and VZV. A second analysis, performed with RT-PCR from a new sample taken 2 months later, showed the same results, which led to the diagnosis of recurrent concomitant HS and HZ with a recurrent HZ clinical pattern. The patient was started on valacyclovir 1 g daily, and the number and intensity of flares diminished in the months following treatment.

Concomitant HS and HZ on the same dermatome has been described in the literature.^3,4 In a retrospective series of 20 immunocompetent patients, HZ was the main presumed diagnosis before laboratory confirmation of diagnosis, and only 1 case corresponded to recurrent HZ.³ Other cases of simultaneous HS and HZ have been described, but they did not occur on the same dermatome. Half of these reported cases were in immunosuppressed patients.^5,6

The recurrent nature of HS is well known; however, recurrent cases of HZ are rare. Nevertheless, in a population-based cohort study of patients with a confirmed prior episode of HZ (N=1669), recurrences were found in 6% of patients.⁷ Recurrence was more common if the patient was immunosuppressed, was female and 50 years or older, and had pain for more than 30 days.⁷

The recurrence rate was high in our case, but no immunosuppressive factor could be found apart from probable subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Systemic lupus erythematosus has been associated with a high risk for developing HZ secondary to cell-mediated immunosuppression. The annual incidence of HZ can reach 32 of 1000 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, while in the general population the incidence is only 1.5 to 3 of 1000 patients.^8-10

Direct detection of antigens of HS and HZ is a fast and inexpensive technique but lacks the sensitivity of viral cultures. Viral cultures used to be considered the gold standard; however, they are less sensitive than PCR.¹¹ Furthermore, VZV detection is more difficult than HS, leading to a notable percentage of false-negative results.¹² Polymerase chain reaction is a fast, reliable, and sensitive laboratory technique. Real-time PCR permits faster results than conventional PCR, specifically for HHV-1, HHV-2, and HZ detection. It also has minimal risk for contamination.^13,14 In our opinion, PCR should be the gold standard instead of viral cultures. It has proven its superiority as a rapid method for detection, it is the most sensitive test, it is easier to perform, and it is cost effective (Table).^11,15-19 However, viral cultures can allow sensitivity testing and are still an option for determination of susceptibility to antivirals.

In our case, a false-positive was excluded because no sign of possible contamination was found, repeated internal analysis from the same sample confirmed the results, and a new analysis from a new flare showed the same results 2 months later. However, we cannot rule out that the positivity for HZ of the second sample was due to the high sensitivity of the test and a virus latency in nerves.

We propose the use of PCR as a method of choice. Presumably more cases of recurrent HZ and concomitant HS and HZ will be seen with PCR use. In the case of a concomitant infection of HS and HZ, it is reasonable to use an antiviral dosage as in HZ treatment. No literature regarding outcomes from therapy could be found.

To the Editor:

Infections caused by herpes simplex (HS) and herpes zoster (HZ) usually can be recognized by clinical findings; however, laboratory confirmation sometimes is required. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) laboratory tests detect HS or HZ in a sensible and specific manner. New PCR systems such as real-time PCR (RT-PCR) give faster and more precise results. We report a case of recurrent concomitant HZ and HS diagnosed by RT-PCR.

A 62-year-old woman presented with recurrent painful cutaneous lesions on the left buttock and thigh of 9 years’ duration. This eruption was preceded by a burning sensation of 1 week’s duration that extended toward the heel. Cutaneous lesions normally were sparse and persisted for a few days. She also had annular erythematous lesions of 3 years’ duration on the upper trunk and shoulders after sun exposure. On physical examination, an atrophic hypopigmented patch was seen with a few vesicles located on the thigh. Whitish atrophic patches also were found in a linear distribution on the left buttock and thigh (Figure).

Laboratory results included the following: antinuclear antibody, 1:400 on a nuclear dotted pattern; extractable nuclear antigens (anti-Ro60 and anti-Ro52) were positive (reference range, >15); and rheumatoid factor was 24.1 U/mL (reference range, 0–15 U/mL). The patient did not meet any other American College of Rheumatology criteria^1,2 of systemic lupus erythematosus apart from photosensitivity. The rest of the analysis—complete blood cell count, liver enzymes, and biochemistry—was normal or negative. Human immunodeficiency virus, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HHV-1 and HHV-2), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) IgM serologies were negative, whereas IgG VZV serology was positive.

The microbiological study via swab obtained from the roof and fluid from the vesicles showed an indeterminate result from the rapid direct antigen detection with immunofluorescent antibodies. Viral cultures were HHV-2 positive and VZV negative. Conventional PCR showed positive results, both for HHV-2 and VZV. A second analysis, performed with RT-PCR from a new sample taken 2 months later, showed the same results, which led to the diagnosis of recurrent concomitant HS and HZ with a recurrent HZ clinical pattern. The patient was started on valacyclovir 1 g daily, and the number and intensity of flares diminished in the months following treatment.

Concomitant HS and HZ on the same dermatome has been described in the literature.^3,4 In a retrospective series of 20 immunocompetent patients, HZ was the main presumed diagnosis before laboratory confirmation of diagnosis, and only 1 case corresponded to recurrent HZ.³ Other cases of simultaneous HS and HZ have been described, but they did not occur on the same dermatome. Half of these reported cases were in immunosuppressed patients.^5,6

The recurrent nature of HS is well known; however, recurrent cases of HZ are rare. Nevertheless, in a population-based cohort study of patients with a confirmed prior episode of HZ (N=1669), recurrences were found in 6% of patients.⁷ Recurrence was more common if the patient was immunosuppressed, was female and 50 years or older, and had pain for more than 30 days.⁷

The recurrence rate was high in our case, but no immunosuppressive factor could be found apart from probable subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Systemic lupus erythematosus has been associated with a high risk for developing HZ secondary to cell-mediated immunosuppression. The annual incidence of HZ can reach 32 of 1000 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, while in the general population the incidence is only 1.5 to 3 of 1000 patients.^8-10

Direct detection of antigens of HS and HZ is a fast and inexpensive technique but lacks the sensitivity of viral cultures. Viral cultures used to be considered the gold standard; however, they are less sensitive than PCR.¹¹ Furthermore, VZV detection is more difficult than HS, leading to a notable percentage of false-negative results.¹² Polymerase chain reaction is a fast, reliable, and sensitive laboratory technique. Real-time PCR permits faster results than conventional PCR, specifically for HHV-1, HHV-2, and HZ detection. It also has minimal risk for contamination.^13,14 In our opinion, PCR should be the gold standard instead of viral cultures. It has proven its superiority as a rapid method for detection, it is the most sensitive test, it is easier to perform, and it is cost effective (Table).^11,15-19 However, viral cultures can allow sensitivity testing and are still an option for determination of susceptibility to antivirals.

In our case, a false-positive was excluded because no sign of possible contamination was found, repeated internal analysis from the same sample confirmed the results, and a new analysis from a new flare showed the same results 2 months later. However, we cannot rule out that the positivity for HZ of the second sample was due to the high sensitivity of the test and a virus latency in nerves.

We propose the use of PCR as a method of choice. Presumably more cases of recurrent HZ and concomitant HS and HZ will be seen with PCR use. In the case of a concomitant infection of HS and HZ, it is reasonable to use an antiviral dosage as in HZ treatment. No literature regarding outcomes from therapy could be found.