User login
Does alendronate treatment prevent vertebral fractures in men with osteoporosis?
BACKGROUND: Although osteoporosis is more common in women, approximately one fourth of all hip fractures occur in men. There are no approved therapies in the United States for men with osteoporosis. The drug alendronate, a potent bisphosphonate, has been shown to increase bone mineral density and reduce the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures in women.
POPULATION STUDIED: The men were recruited at osteoporosis clinics and at community assessments of bone mineral density across 20 centers in the United States and 10 other countries. Men could qualify for the study in 2 ways: (1) bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck that was 2 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean value of normal young men and BMD at the lumbar spine 1 SD below the mean in normal young men, or (2) BMD at the femoral neck 1 SD below the mean in normal young men and at least one vertebral deformity or a history of osteoporotic fracture. All men with secondary causes of osteoporosis other than low serum-free testosterone concentrations were excluded. A total of 241 men with a mean age of 63 years (range=31-87 years) were enrolled in the study.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: In this 2-year double-blind trial the men were randomized to either alendronate 10 mg or matching placebo. Subjects who were androgen deficient or androgen replete were stratified to ensure equal distribution between the 2 treatment groups. Calcium and vitamin D supplements were provided to all of the men. BMD, height, and fractures were measured at the follow-up visits. The 2 groups were similar in age, race, testosterone levels, smoking history, consumption of alcohol, body mass index, baseline BMD scores, and vertebral fractures. Most of the men were white, which may limit generalization of these results to other racial groups. The authors did not report the method of randomization or how allocation to treatment or control groups was concealed from the patients and their physicians. Radiologists were blinded to the treatment assignment, and analysis was appropriately by intention to treat.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The main patient-oriented outcome was the incidence of vertebral fractures between the placebo and the alendronate groups. Disease-oriented outcomes included changes in BMD (lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body) and vertebral height.
RESULTS: The incidence of vertebral fractures was 7.1% in the placebo group and 0.8% in the alendronate group (P=.02). There were 4 painful vertebral fractures in the placebo group and 1 in the alendronate group (P=.3), but the study was too small and too short to prove this outcome. Men in the placebo group lost 2.4 mm in stature compared with a nonsignificant change of 0.6 mm in the alendronate group (P=.02). In the alendronate group, BMD increased by a mean of 7.1%±0.3% at the lumbar spine, 2.5%±0.4% at the femoral neck, and 2.0%± 0.2% for the total body (P <.001). For the placebo group, the BMD increased by a mean of 1.8%±0.5% at the lumbar spine (P <.001). No significant changes in BMD at the femoral neck or total body were found for the placebo group. At each site the alendronate group had a significantly greater increase in BMD than the placebo group. These effects were independent of baseline serum-free testosterone concentrations.
For men with osteoporosis or osteopenia and a history of vertebral fracture, alendronate 10 mg orally once a day significantly reduces the risk of vertebral fracture and prevents decreases in height. It also significantly increases BMD of the spine, hip, and total body compared with the placebo group.
BACKGROUND: Although osteoporosis is more common in women, approximately one fourth of all hip fractures occur in men. There are no approved therapies in the United States for men with osteoporosis. The drug alendronate, a potent bisphosphonate, has been shown to increase bone mineral density and reduce the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures in women.
POPULATION STUDIED: The men were recruited at osteoporosis clinics and at community assessments of bone mineral density across 20 centers in the United States and 10 other countries. Men could qualify for the study in 2 ways: (1) bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck that was 2 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean value of normal young men and BMD at the lumbar spine 1 SD below the mean in normal young men, or (2) BMD at the femoral neck 1 SD below the mean in normal young men and at least one vertebral deformity or a history of osteoporotic fracture. All men with secondary causes of osteoporosis other than low serum-free testosterone concentrations were excluded. A total of 241 men with a mean age of 63 years (range=31-87 years) were enrolled in the study.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: In this 2-year double-blind trial the men were randomized to either alendronate 10 mg or matching placebo. Subjects who were androgen deficient or androgen replete were stratified to ensure equal distribution between the 2 treatment groups. Calcium and vitamin D supplements were provided to all of the men. BMD, height, and fractures were measured at the follow-up visits. The 2 groups were similar in age, race, testosterone levels, smoking history, consumption of alcohol, body mass index, baseline BMD scores, and vertebral fractures. Most of the men were white, which may limit generalization of these results to other racial groups. The authors did not report the method of randomization or how allocation to treatment or control groups was concealed from the patients and their physicians. Radiologists were blinded to the treatment assignment, and analysis was appropriately by intention to treat.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The main patient-oriented outcome was the incidence of vertebral fractures between the placebo and the alendronate groups. Disease-oriented outcomes included changes in BMD (lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body) and vertebral height.
RESULTS: The incidence of vertebral fractures was 7.1% in the placebo group and 0.8% in the alendronate group (P=.02). There were 4 painful vertebral fractures in the placebo group and 1 in the alendronate group (P=.3), but the study was too small and too short to prove this outcome. Men in the placebo group lost 2.4 mm in stature compared with a nonsignificant change of 0.6 mm in the alendronate group (P=.02). In the alendronate group, BMD increased by a mean of 7.1%±0.3% at the lumbar spine, 2.5%±0.4% at the femoral neck, and 2.0%± 0.2% for the total body (P <.001). For the placebo group, the BMD increased by a mean of 1.8%±0.5% at the lumbar spine (P <.001). No significant changes in BMD at the femoral neck or total body were found for the placebo group. At each site the alendronate group had a significantly greater increase in BMD than the placebo group. These effects were independent of baseline serum-free testosterone concentrations.
For men with osteoporosis or osteopenia and a history of vertebral fracture, alendronate 10 mg orally once a day significantly reduces the risk of vertebral fracture and prevents decreases in height. It also significantly increases BMD of the spine, hip, and total body compared with the placebo group.
BACKGROUND: Although osteoporosis is more common in women, approximately one fourth of all hip fractures occur in men. There are no approved therapies in the United States for men with osteoporosis. The drug alendronate, a potent bisphosphonate, has been shown to increase bone mineral density and reduce the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures in women.
POPULATION STUDIED: The men were recruited at osteoporosis clinics and at community assessments of bone mineral density across 20 centers in the United States and 10 other countries. Men could qualify for the study in 2 ways: (1) bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck that was 2 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean value of normal young men and BMD at the lumbar spine 1 SD below the mean in normal young men, or (2) BMD at the femoral neck 1 SD below the mean in normal young men and at least one vertebral deformity or a history of osteoporotic fracture. All men with secondary causes of osteoporosis other than low serum-free testosterone concentrations were excluded. A total of 241 men with a mean age of 63 years (range=31-87 years) were enrolled in the study.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: In this 2-year double-blind trial the men were randomized to either alendronate 10 mg or matching placebo. Subjects who were androgen deficient or androgen replete were stratified to ensure equal distribution between the 2 treatment groups. Calcium and vitamin D supplements were provided to all of the men. BMD, height, and fractures were measured at the follow-up visits. The 2 groups were similar in age, race, testosterone levels, smoking history, consumption of alcohol, body mass index, baseline BMD scores, and vertebral fractures. Most of the men were white, which may limit generalization of these results to other racial groups. The authors did not report the method of randomization or how allocation to treatment or control groups was concealed from the patients and their physicians. Radiologists were blinded to the treatment assignment, and analysis was appropriately by intention to treat.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The main patient-oriented outcome was the incidence of vertebral fractures between the placebo and the alendronate groups. Disease-oriented outcomes included changes in BMD (lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body) and vertebral height.
RESULTS: The incidence of vertebral fractures was 7.1% in the placebo group and 0.8% in the alendronate group (P=.02). There were 4 painful vertebral fractures in the placebo group and 1 in the alendronate group (P=.3), but the study was too small and too short to prove this outcome. Men in the placebo group lost 2.4 mm in stature compared with a nonsignificant change of 0.6 mm in the alendronate group (P=.02). In the alendronate group, BMD increased by a mean of 7.1%±0.3% at the lumbar spine, 2.5%±0.4% at the femoral neck, and 2.0%± 0.2% for the total body (P <.001). For the placebo group, the BMD increased by a mean of 1.8%±0.5% at the lumbar spine (P <.001). No significant changes in BMD at the femoral neck or total body were found for the placebo group. At each site the alendronate group had a significantly greater increase in BMD than the placebo group. These effects were independent of baseline serum-free testosterone concentrations.
For men with osteoporosis or osteopenia and a history of vertebral fracture, alendronate 10 mg orally once a day significantly reduces the risk of vertebral fracture and prevents decreases in height. It also significantly increases BMD of the spine, hip, and total body compared with the placebo group.
A 65-year-old factory worker with dyspnea on exertion and a normal chest x-ray
The return of The Clinical Picture
Erratum (2000;65:401-404)
How to help your patients lose weight: Current therapy for obesity
Diastolic dysfunction and heart failure: Causes and treatment options
The evolving role of hormone therapy in advanced prostate cancer
What’s your opinion of CCJM’s Patient Information page?
Is exposure to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), fibrates, or other lipid-lowering drugs associated with reduced risk of bone fracture in older patients?
BACKGROUND: Animal studies have demonstrated that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) increase bone formation and bone volume. Although studies in humans suggest that statins may increase bone formation, no research has been done to determine whether older persons taking these drugs will have a decreased risk of fracture.
POPULATION STUDIED: The study used data from the United Kingdom-based General Practice Research Database, which includes information from approximately 300 general practices. The base population consisted of more than 91,000 individuals aged 50 to 89 years. Of these, more than 28,000 had received at least 1 prescription for a lipid-lowering drug for hyperlipidemia, approximately 13,000 had hyperlipidemia but were not taking lipid-lowering agents, and 50,000 were randomly selected patients without a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteomalacia, malignancy, alcoholism, or if they were taking bisphosphonates. A total of 3940 patients who had a bone fracture were identified by the International Classification of Diseases-eighth revision (ICD-8) and were verified by hospital discharge records or referral letters to specialists. These case patients were matched for age, sex, practice attended, calendar year, and years enrolled to 23,379 control group patients from the base population who had not had a fracture.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: This was a large population-based case-control study nested within an ongoing study. Members of the 3 groups were followed until they developed a fracture, left the practice, or died. Patients taking a lipid-lowering drug were categorized as being current users, recent users, and past users.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome was the risk of development of a first-time fracture of the femur, humerus, hand, wrist, lower arm, clavicle, vertebral body, foot, or other unspecified fracture among the 3 groups as estimated by the odds ratio. The authors used statistical analysis (logistic regression) to consider the type, timing, and duration of treatment as estimated by numbers of prescriptions filled.
RESULTS: After adjusting for variables including smoking status, weight, hormone replacement therapy or corticosteroid use, and the number of office visits before the fracture, patients who had any current or recent recorded prescriptions for statins before the date of fracture had a significantly lowered risk of fracture with adjusted odds ratios of 0.55 for current users (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.69) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50-0.92) for recent users of statins. The odds ratio for previous users of statins was not statistically significant. A consistent class effect was noted, with all statins associated with decreased fracture risk. Other lipid-lowering agents were not associated with a reduced risk for fracture. The effect of statins on risk of fracture did not differ by the skeletal site of fracture, age group, or sex.
This population-based case-control study suggests that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, but not other lipid-lowering agents, are associated with a significantly decreased risk of subsequent fracture in humans, especially in current users. There may be biologic plausibility for this effect in that both statins and bisphosphonates act in the same metabolic pathway (the mevalonate pathway) that may ultimately affect osteoclastic activity. Other recently reported case-controlled studies find protective effects of similar magnitude. Statin use has been associated with a 43% to 50% lowering of risk of hip fracture among elderly users, and another study reports a reduction of risk of fracture of 52% among elderly women using statins. 1,2
However, these studies cannot establish a causal relationship between statin use and decreased risk of fracture. As with all observational studies, it is possible that unknown factors may provide alternative explanations for these findings. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm any benefit of statins in reducing risk of fracture. In addition, the added benefit of statins to current regimens for fracture prevention (calcium, Vitamin D, estrogen, biphosphonat
BACKGROUND: Animal studies have demonstrated that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) increase bone formation and bone volume. Although studies in humans suggest that statins may increase bone formation, no research has been done to determine whether older persons taking these drugs will have a decreased risk of fracture.
POPULATION STUDIED: The study used data from the United Kingdom-based General Practice Research Database, which includes information from approximately 300 general practices. The base population consisted of more than 91,000 individuals aged 50 to 89 years. Of these, more than 28,000 had received at least 1 prescription for a lipid-lowering drug for hyperlipidemia, approximately 13,000 had hyperlipidemia but were not taking lipid-lowering agents, and 50,000 were randomly selected patients without a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteomalacia, malignancy, alcoholism, or if they were taking bisphosphonates. A total of 3940 patients who had a bone fracture were identified by the International Classification of Diseases-eighth revision (ICD-8) and were verified by hospital discharge records or referral letters to specialists. These case patients were matched for age, sex, practice attended, calendar year, and years enrolled to 23,379 control group patients from the base population who had not had a fracture.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: This was a large population-based case-control study nested within an ongoing study. Members of the 3 groups were followed until they developed a fracture, left the practice, or died. Patients taking a lipid-lowering drug were categorized as being current users, recent users, and past users.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome was the risk of development of a first-time fracture of the femur, humerus, hand, wrist, lower arm, clavicle, vertebral body, foot, or other unspecified fracture among the 3 groups as estimated by the odds ratio. The authors used statistical analysis (logistic regression) to consider the type, timing, and duration of treatment as estimated by numbers of prescriptions filled.
RESULTS: After adjusting for variables including smoking status, weight, hormone replacement therapy or corticosteroid use, and the number of office visits before the fracture, patients who had any current or recent recorded prescriptions for statins before the date of fracture had a significantly lowered risk of fracture with adjusted odds ratios of 0.55 for current users (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.69) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50-0.92) for recent users of statins. The odds ratio for previous users of statins was not statistically significant. A consistent class effect was noted, with all statins associated with decreased fracture risk. Other lipid-lowering agents were not associated with a reduced risk for fracture. The effect of statins on risk of fracture did not differ by the skeletal site of fracture, age group, or sex.
This population-based case-control study suggests that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, but not other lipid-lowering agents, are associated with a significantly decreased risk of subsequent fracture in humans, especially in current users. There may be biologic plausibility for this effect in that both statins and bisphosphonates act in the same metabolic pathway (the mevalonate pathway) that may ultimately affect osteoclastic activity. Other recently reported case-controlled studies find protective effects of similar magnitude. Statin use has been associated with a 43% to 50% lowering of risk of hip fracture among elderly users, and another study reports a reduction of risk of fracture of 52% among elderly women using statins. 1,2
However, these studies cannot establish a causal relationship between statin use and decreased risk of fracture. As with all observational studies, it is possible that unknown factors may provide alternative explanations for these findings. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm any benefit of statins in reducing risk of fracture. In addition, the added benefit of statins to current regimens for fracture prevention (calcium, Vitamin D, estrogen, biphosphonat
BACKGROUND: Animal studies have demonstrated that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) increase bone formation and bone volume. Although studies in humans suggest that statins may increase bone formation, no research has been done to determine whether older persons taking these drugs will have a decreased risk of fracture.
POPULATION STUDIED: The study used data from the United Kingdom-based General Practice Research Database, which includes information from approximately 300 general practices. The base population consisted of more than 91,000 individuals aged 50 to 89 years. Of these, more than 28,000 had received at least 1 prescription for a lipid-lowering drug for hyperlipidemia, approximately 13,000 had hyperlipidemia but were not taking lipid-lowering agents, and 50,000 were randomly selected patients without a diagnosis of hyperlipidemia. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteomalacia, malignancy, alcoholism, or if they were taking bisphosphonates. A total of 3940 patients who had a bone fracture were identified by the International Classification of Diseases-eighth revision (ICD-8) and were verified by hospital discharge records or referral letters to specialists. These case patients were matched for age, sex, practice attended, calendar year, and years enrolled to 23,379 control group patients from the base population who had not had a fracture.
STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: This was a large population-based case-control study nested within an ongoing study. Members of the 3 groups were followed until they developed a fracture, left the practice, or died. Patients taking a lipid-lowering drug were categorized as being current users, recent users, and past users.
OUTCOMES MEASURED: The primary outcome was the risk of development of a first-time fracture of the femur, humerus, hand, wrist, lower arm, clavicle, vertebral body, foot, or other unspecified fracture among the 3 groups as estimated by the odds ratio. The authors used statistical analysis (logistic regression) to consider the type, timing, and duration of treatment as estimated by numbers of prescriptions filled.
RESULTS: After adjusting for variables including smoking status, weight, hormone replacement therapy or corticosteroid use, and the number of office visits before the fracture, patients who had any current or recent recorded prescriptions for statins before the date of fracture had a significantly lowered risk of fracture with adjusted odds ratios of 0.55 for current users (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.69) and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50-0.92) for recent users of statins. The odds ratio for previous users of statins was not statistically significant. A consistent class effect was noted, with all statins associated with decreased fracture risk. Other lipid-lowering agents were not associated with a reduced risk for fracture. The effect of statins on risk of fracture did not differ by the skeletal site of fracture, age group, or sex.
This population-based case-control study suggests that the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, but not other lipid-lowering agents, are associated with a significantly decreased risk of subsequent fracture in humans, especially in current users. There may be biologic plausibility for this effect in that both statins and bisphosphonates act in the same metabolic pathway (the mevalonate pathway) that may ultimately affect osteoclastic activity. Other recently reported case-controlled studies find protective effects of similar magnitude. Statin use has been associated with a 43% to 50% lowering of risk of hip fracture among elderly users, and another study reports a reduction of risk of fracture of 52% among elderly women using statins. 1,2
However, these studies cannot establish a causal relationship between statin use and decreased risk of fracture. As with all observational studies, it is possible that unknown factors may provide alternative explanations for these findings. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm any benefit of statins in reducing risk of fracture. In addition, the added benefit of statins to current regimens for fracture prevention (calcium, Vitamin D, estrogen, biphosphonat