User login
B-cell energy levels linked to leukemic transformation

Photo from Business Wire
A pair of transcription factors protect B cells from malignant transformation by keeping the cells’ glucose and energy levels low, according to research published in Nature.
“While transformation to cancer and childhood leukemia takes large amounts of energy, we discovered that low energy levels in B cells protects from malignant transformation toward leukemia and cancer,” said study author Markus Müschen, MD, PhD, of City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, California.
“The low energy levels in normal B cells are simply too low to allow transformation to leukemia.”
Dr Müschen and his colleagues found that PAX5 and IKZF1, transcription factors that are critical for early B-cell development, “enforce a state of chronic energy deprivation” that results in constitutive activation of the energy-stress sensor AMPK.
However, dominant-negative mutants of PAX5 and IKZF1 reverse this effect.
Past research has suggested that mutations and deletions in the PAX5 and IKZF1 genes occur in more than 80% of cases of pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
In the current study, Dr Müschen and his colleagues found that heterozygous deletion of Pax5 in a mouse model of pre-B ALL greatly increased glucose uptake and ATP levels.
Similarly, when they reconstituted PAX5 and IKZF1 in samples from patients with pre-B ALL, the investigators observed “an energy crisis” that prompted leukemic cell death.
Dr Müschen and his colleagues also performed a CRISPR/Cas9-based screen of PAX5 and IKZF1 transcriptional targets. They said this revealed that NR3C1, TXNIP, and CNR2 are central effectors of B-lymphoid restriction of glucose and energy.
To build upon this finding, the investigators tested TXNIP and CNR2 agonists as well as a small-molecule AMPK inhibitor. They found these compounds synergized with glucocorticoids in patient-derived pre-B ALL cells.
The team therefore concluded that TXNIP, CNR2, and AMPK are potential therapeutic targets for pre-B ALL.
The investigators also said the results of this study support a previous finding that obese children with high blood sugar levels are much more likely to develop drug-resistant leukemia than children who are not overweight. So dieting could be an important consideration for children who have survived leukemia.
“Avoiding obesity and excessive energy supply may help to decrease the risk of leukemia relapse,” said study author Lai Chan, PhD, also of City of Hope.
To test that theory, Drs Chan and Müschen and their colleagues plan to perform experiments in animal models to evaluate the efficacy of dietary restriction on patient-derived childhood leukemia cells, and to assess the activity of drugs that reduce leukemia cells’ glucose and energy supply.
“Based on the outcome of these studies, we plan to introduce dietary restriction and/or glucose-restricting drugs into a clinical trial for children who are at risk to develop leukemia relapse,” Dr Müschen said. ![]()

Photo from Business Wire
A pair of transcription factors protect B cells from malignant transformation by keeping the cells’ glucose and energy levels low, according to research published in Nature.
“While transformation to cancer and childhood leukemia takes large amounts of energy, we discovered that low energy levels in B cells protects from malignant transformation toward leukemia and cancer,” said study author Markus Müschen, MD, PhD, of City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, California.
“The low energy levels in normal B cells are simply too low to allow transformation to leukemia.”
Dr Müschen and his colleagues found that PAX5 and IKZF1, transcription factors that are critical for early B-cell development, “enforce a state of chronic energy deprivation” that results in constitutive activation of the energy-stress sensor AMPK.
However, dominant-negative mutants of PAX5 and IKZF1 reverse this effect.
Past research has suggested that mutations and deletions in the PAX5 and IKZF1 genes occur in more than 80% of cases of pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
In the current study, Dr Müschen and his colleagues found that heterozygous deletion of Pax5 in a mouse model of pre-B ALL greatly increased glucose uptake and ATP levels.
Similarly, when they reconstituted PAX5 and IKZF1 in samples from patients with pre-B ALL, the investigators observed “an energy crisis” that prompted leukemic cell death.
Dr Müschen and his colleagues also performed a CRISPR/Cas9-based screen of PAX5 and IKZF1 transcriptional targets. They said this revealed that NR3C1, TXNIP, and CNR2 are central effectors of B-lymphoid restriction of glucose and energy.
To build upon this finding, the investigators tested TXNIP and CNR2 agonists as well as a small-molecule AMPK inhibitor. They found these compounds synergized with glucocorticoids in patient-derived pre-B ALL cells.
The team therefore concluded that TXNIP, CNR2, and AMPK are potential therapeutic targets for pre-B ALL.
The investigators also said the results of this study support a previous finding that obese children with high blood sugar levels are much more likely to develop drug-resistant leukemia than children who are not overweight. So dieting could be an important consideration for children who have survived leukemia.
“Avoiding obesity and excessive energy supply may help to decrease the risk of leukemia relapse,” said study author Lai Chan, PhD, also of City of Hope.
To test that theory, Drs Chan and Müschen and their colleagues plan to perform experiments in animal models to evaluate the efficacy of dietary restriction on patient-derived childhood leukemia cells, and to assess the activity of drugs that reduce leukemia cells’ glucose and energy supply.
“Based on the outcome of these studies, we plan to introduce dietary restriction and/or glucose-restricting drugs into a clinical trial for children who are at risk to develop leukemia relapse,” Dr Müschen said. ![]()

Photo from Business Wire
A pair of transcription factors protect B cells from malignant transformation by keeping the cells’ glucose and energy levels low, according to research published in Nature.
“While transformation to cancer and childhood leukemia takes large amounts of energy, we discovered that low energy levels in B cells protects from malignant transformation toward leukemia and cancer,” said study author Markus Müschen, MD, PhD, of City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center in Duarte, California.
“The low energy levels in normal B cells are simply too low to allow transformation to leukemia.”
Dr Müschen and his colleagues found that PAX5 and IKZF1, transcription factors that are critical for early B-cell development, “enforce a state of chronic energy deprivation” that results in constitutive activation of the energy-stress sensor AMPK.
However, dominant-negative mutants of PAX5 and IKZF1 reverse this effect.
Past research has suggested that mutations and deletions in the PAX5 and IKZF1 genes occur in more than 80% of cases of pre-B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
In the current study, Dr Müschen and his colleagues found that heterozygous deletion of Pax5 in a mouse model of pre-B ALL greatly increased glucose uptake and ATP levels.
Similarly, when they reconstituted PAX5 and IKZF1 in samples from patients with pre-B ALL, the investigators observed “an energy crisis” that prompted leukemic cell death.
Dr Müschen and his colleagues also performed a CRISPR/Cas9-based screen of PAX5 and IKZF1 transcriptional targets. They said this revealed that NR3C1, TXNIP, and CNR2 are central effectors of B-lymphoid restriction of glucose and energy.
To build upon this finding, the investigators tested TXNIP and CNR2 agonists as well as a small-molecule AMPK inhibitor. They found these compounds synergized with glucocorticoids in patient-derived pre-B ALL cells.
The team therefore concluded that TXNIP, CNR2, and AMPK are potential therapeutic targets for pre-B ALL.
The investigators also said the results of this study support a previous finding that obese children with high blood sugar levels are much more likely to develop drug-resistant leukemia than children who are not overweight. So dieting could be an important consideration for children who have survived leukemia.
“Avoiding obesity and excessive energy supply may help to decrease the risk of leukemia relapse,” said study author Lai Chan, PhD, also of City of Hope.
To test that theory, Drs Chan and Müschen and their colleagues plan to perform experiments in animal models to evaluate the efficacy of dietary restriction on patient-derived childhood leukemia cells, and to assess the activity of drugs that reduce leukemia cells’ glucose and energy supply.
“Based on the outcome of these studies, we plan to introduce dietary restriction and/or glucose-restricting drugs into a clinical trial for children who are at risk to develop leukemia relapse,” Dr Müschen said. ![]()
Predicting the efficacy of malaria vaccines

Photo by Caitlin Kleiboer
Researchers say they have identified molecular signatures that could potentially be used to predict whether the malaria vaccine RTS,S will be effective.
The group says the research, published in PNAS, could inform decisions on how RTS,S or other malaria vaccines are deployed or modified.
RTS,S (also known as RTS,S/AS01 or Mosquirix) has been shown to provide partial protection against malaria in phase 2 and phase 3 trials.
The vaccine is scheduled for roll-out through pilot projects in 3 African countries next year, according to the World Health Organization.
With the current study, researchers used a systems biology approach to identify molecular signatures induced after subjects were vaccinated with RTS,S.
The team looked at 2 groups of subjects:
- Individuals vaccinated with the standard RTS,S vaccination regimen, which consists of 3 RTS,S immunizations (RRR)
- Individuals vaccinated first with recombinant adenovirus 35 (Ad35) expressing the circumsporozoite malaria antigen, followed by 2 immunizations with RTS,S (ARR).
Vaccinated subjects were exposed to mosquitoes infected with Plasmodium falciparum 3 weeks after their final immunization.
Both vaccination regimens resulted in about 50% protection from malaria infection. And the researchers identified markers in each group that were associated with protection.
In the RRR group, circumsporozoite protein-specific antibody titers, prior to the challenge with infected mosquitoes, were associated with protection from malaria infection.
In addition, molecular signatures of B and plasma cells detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were associated with pre-challenge antibody titers and protection from malaria infection in the RRR group.
In the ARR group, protection from infection was associated with polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell responses 2 weeks after priming with Ad35, early signatures of innate immunity, and dendritic cell activation.
In both groups, natural killer (NK) cell signatures were negatively correlated with protection.
“Many of the genes contained in the predictive signatures are known to be expressed in natural killer cells, which mediate critical immune functions against viruses,” said study author Bali Pulendran, PhD, of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia.
“It was a surprise to see such a robust ‘NK cell signature’ in predicting success of vaccination against the malaria parasite and raises the hypothesis that such cells may be playing a vital role in orchestrating immunity against malaria.”
Dr Pulendran and his colleagues said the results of this research suggest protective immunity against P falciparum can be achieved via multiple mechanisms.
“The extent to which these candidate signatures of protection can successfully predict vaccine efficacy in other field trials remain to be determined,” Dr Pulendran noted. ![]()

Photo by Caitlin Kleiboer
Researchers say they have identified molecular signatures that could potentially be used to predict whether the malaria vaccine RTS,S will be effective.
The group says the research, published in PNAS, could inform decisions on how RTS,S or other malaria vaccines are deployed or modified.
RTS,S (also known as RTS,S/AS01 or Mosquirix) has been shown to provide partial protection against malaria in phase 2 and phase 3 trials.
The vaccine is scheduled for roll-out through pilot projects in 3 African countries next year, according to the World Health Organization.
With the current study, researchers used a systems biology approach to identify molecular signatures induced after subjects were vaccinated with RTS,S.
The team looked at 2 groups of subjects:
- Individuals vaccinated with the standard RTS,S vaccination regimen, which consists of 3 RTS,S immunizations (RRR)
- Individuals vaccinated first with recombinant adenovirus 35 (Ad35) expressing the circumsporozoite malaria antigen, followed by 2 immunizations with RTS,S (ARR).
Vaccinated subjects were exposed to mosquitoes infected with Plasmodium falciparum 3 weeks after their final immunization.
Both vaccination regimens resulted in about 50% protection from malaria infection. And the researchers identified markers in each group that were associated with protection.
In the RRR group, circumsporozoite protein-specific antibody titers, prior to the challenge with infected mosquitoes, were associated with protection from malaria infection.
In addition, molecular signatures of B and plasma cells detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were associated with pre-challenge antibody titers and protection from malaria infection in the RRR group.
In the ARR group, protection from infection was associated with polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell responses 2 weeks after priming with Ad35, early signatures of innate immunity, and dendritic cell activation.
In both groups, natural killer (NK) cell signatures were negatively correlated with protection.
“Many of the genes contained in the predictive signatures are known to be expressed in natural killer cells, which mediate critical immune functions against viruses,” said study author Bali Pulendran, PhD, of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia.
“It was a surprise to see such a robust ‘NK cell signature’ in predicting success of vaccination against the malaria parasite and raises the hypothesis that such cells may be playing a vital role in orchestrating immunity against malaria.”
Dr Pulendran and his colleagues said the results of this research suggest protective immunity against P falciparum can be achieved via multiple mechanisms.
“The extent to which these candidate signatures of protection can successfully predict vaccine efficacy in other field trials remain to be determined,” Dr Pulendran noted. ![]()

Photo by Caitlin Kleiboer
Researchers say they have identified molecular signatures that could potentially be used to predict whether the malaria vaccine RTS,S will be effective.
The group says the research, published in PNAS, could inform decisions on how RTS,S or other malaria vaccines are deployed or modified.
RTS,S (also known as RTS,S/AS01 or Mosquirix) has been shown to provide partial protection against malaria in phase 2 and phase 3 trials.
The vaccine is scheduled for roll-out through pilot projects in 3 African countries next year, according to the World Health Organization.
With the current study, researchers used a systems biology approach to identify molecular signatures induced after subjects were vaccinated with RTS,S.
The team looked at 2 groups of subjects:
- Individuals vaccinated with the standard RTS,S vaccination regimen, which consists of 3 RTS,S immunizations (RRR)
- Individuals vaccinated first with recombinant adenovirus 35 (Ad35) expressing the circumsporozoite malaria antigen, followed by 2 immunizations with RTS,S (ARR).
Vaccinated subjects were exposed to mosquitoes infected with Plasmodium falciparum 3 weeks after their final immunization.
Both vaccination regimens resulted in about 50% protection from malaria infection. And the researchers identified markers in each group that were associated with protection.
In the RRR group, circumsporozoite protein-specific antibody titers, prior to the challenge with infected mosquitoes, were associated with protection from malaria infection.
In addition, molecular signatures of B and plasma cells detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were associated with pre-challenge antibody titers and protection from malaria infection in the RRR group.
In the ARR group, protection from infection was associated with polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell responses 2 weeks after priming with Ad35, early signatures of innate immunity, and dendritic cell activation.
In both groups, natural killer (NK) cell signatures were negatively correlated with protection.
“Many of the genes contained in the predictive signatures are known to be expressed in natural killer cells, which mediate critical immune functions against viruses,” said study author Bali Pulendran, PhD, of Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, Georgia.
“It was a surprise to see such a robust ‘NK cell signature’ in predicting success of vaccination against the malaria parasite and raises the hypothesis that such cells may be playing a vital role in orchestrating immunity against malaria.”
Dr Pulendran and his colleagues said the results of this research suggest protective immunity against P falciparum can be achieved via multiple mechanisms.
“The extent to which these candidate signatures of protection can successfully predict vaccine efficacy in other field trials remain to be determined,” Dr Pulendran noted. ![]()
Study reveals patterns of ED use in SCD patients

Photo courtesy of St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital
Population-based surveillance data has revealed patterns of emergency department (ED) visits among Californians with sickle cell disease (SCD).
Previous research suggested that between one-half and two-thirds of SCD patients’ ED visits end in a discharge from the ED, called a treat-and-release visit.
The remainder result in admission to a hospital or other treatment facility.
The purpose of the current study was to use data from the Sickle Cell Data Collection program to describe patterns of ED use for treat-and-release visits by California’s SCD population and compare these new findings with results of previous studies.
The current study was published in Pediatric Blood and Cancer.
Researchers looked at ED and hospital discharge data in California from 2005 to 2014. This included 4636 patients with SCD.
The data showed that 88% of patients had 1 or more treat-and-release ED visits during the 10-year study period.
This group of 4100 patients had 90,904 treat-and-release ED visits. The average number of visits each year was 2.1 (rage, 0-185).
In a single year (2005):
- 53% of patients had no treat-and-release ED visits (no ED use)
- 35% had between 1 and 3 visits (low ED use)
- 9% had between 4 and 10 visits (medium ED use)
- 3% had 11 or more visits (high ED use).
The youngest patients (age 0 to 9.9) and the oldest patients (80 and older) were the least likely to have at least 1 treat-and-release ED visit.
The proportion of patients with at least 1 ED visit over the study period was:
- 68% among patients age 0 to 9.9 at the close of the study
- 80% among patients age 10 to 19.9
- 92% among patients age 20 to 29.9
- 94% among patients age 30 to 39.9
- 93% among patients age 40 to 49.9
- 92% among patients age 50 to 59.9
- 92% among patients age 60 to 69.9
- 85% among patients age 70 to 79.9
- 73% among patients age 80 and older.
The researchers said this study highlights the utility of a multisource, longitudinal data collection effort for SCD. And further study of patients with the highest ED utilization may highlight areas where changes could improve and extend the lives of patients with SCD. ![]()

Photo courtesy of St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital
Population-based surveillance data has revealed patterns of emergency department (ED) visits among Californians with sickle cell disease (SCD).
Previous research suggested that between one-half and two-thirds of SCD patients’ ED visits end in a discharge from the ED, called a treat-and-release visit.
The remainder result in admission to a hospital or other treatment facility.
The purpose of the current study was to use data from the Sickle Cell Data Collection program to describe patterns of ED use for treat-and-release visits by California’s SCD population and compare these new findings with results of previous studies.
The current study was published in Pediatric Blood and Cancer.
Researchers looked at ED and hospital discharge data in California from 2005 to 2014. This included 4636 patients with SCD.
The data showed that 88% of patients had 1 or more treat-and-release ED visits during the 10-year study period.
This group of 4100 patients had 90,904 treat-and-release ED visits. The average number of visits each year was 2.1 (rage, 0-185).
In a single year (2005):
- 53% of patients had no treat-and-release ED visits (no ED use)
- 35% had between 1 and 3 visits (low ED use)
- 9% had between 4 and 10 visits (medium ED use)
- 3% had 11 or more visits (high ED use).
The youngest patients (age 0 to 9.9) and the oldest patients (80 and older) were the least likely to have at least 1 treat-and-release ED visit.
The proportion of patients with at least 1 ED visit over the study period was:
- 68% among patients age 0 to 9.9 at the close of the study
- 80% among patients age 10 to 19.9
- 92% among patients age 20 to 29.9
- 94% among patients age 30 to 39.9
- 93% among patients age 40 to 49.9
- 92% among patients age 50 to 59.9
- 92% among patients age 60 to 69.9
- 85% among patients age 70 to 79.9
- 73% among patients age 80 and older.
The researchers said this study highlights the utility of a multisource, longitudinal data collection effort for SCD. And further study of patients with the highest ED utilization may highlight areas where changes could improve and extend the lives of patients with SCD. ![]()

Photo courtesy of St. Jude
Children’s Research Hospital
Population-based surveillance data has revealed patterns of emergency department (ED) visits among Californians with sickle cell disease (SCD).
Previous research suggested that between one-half and two-thirds of SCD patients’ ED visits end in a discharge from the ED, called a treat-and-release visit.
The remainder result in admission to a hospital or other treatment facility.
The purpose of the current study was to use data from the Sickle Cell Data Collection program to describe patterns of ED use for treat-and-release visits by California’s SCD population and compare these new findings with results of previous studies.
The current study was published in Pediatric Blood and Cancer.
Researchers looked at ED and hospital discharge data in California from 2005 to 2014. This included 4636 patients with SCD.
The data showed that 88% of patients had 1 or more treat-and-release ED visits during the 10-year study period.
This group of 4100 patients had 90,904 treat-and-release ED visits. The average number of visits each year was 2.1 (rage, 0-185).
In a single year (2005):
- 53% of patients had no treat-and-release ED visits (no ED use)
- 35% had between 1 and 3 visits (low ED use)
- 9% had between 4 and 10 visits (medium ED use)
- 3% had 11 or more visits (high ED use).
The youngest patients (age 0 to 9.9) and the oldest patients (80 and older) were the least likely to have at least 1 treat-and-release ED visit.
The proportion of patients with at least 1 ED visit over the study period was:
- 68% among patients age 0 to 9.9 at the close of the study
- 80% among patients age 10 to 19.9
- 92% among patients age 20 to 29.9
- 94% among patients age 30 to 39.9
- 93% among patients age 40 to 49.9
- 92% among patients age 50 to 59.9
- 92% among patients age 60 to 69.9
- 85% among patients age 70 to 79.9
- 73% among patients age 80 and older.
The researchers said this study highlights the utility of a multisource, longitudinal data collection effort for SCD. And further study of patients with the highest ED utilization may highlight areas where changes could improve and extend the lives of patients with SCD. ![]()
The Rural-Urban Gap in Mortality
Americans who live in rural areas are more likely than their urban counterparts are to die of the 5 leading causes of death, according to a CDC study of data from the National Vital Statistics System.
In 2014, 25,000 rural residents died of heart disease, 19,000 of cancer, 12,000 of unintentional injuries, 11,000 of chronic lower respiratory disease, and 4,000 of stroke. The study also found that unintentional injury deaths were about 50% higher in rural areas than in urban areas, partly due to a greater risk of death in vehicle crashes and of opioid overdoses. The problem is compounded by the fact that the distance between health care facilities and trauma centers can make rapid access to specialized health care difficult.
The study researchers say several factors could influence the rural-urban gap. For instance, many of the deaths are associated with sociodemographic differences. Rural residents tend to be older, poorer, and sicker with limited physical activity due to chronic conditions. But that “striking gap” in health can be closed, says CDC Director Tom Frieden, MD, MPH, by better understanding and addressing the health threats that put rural Americans at risk.
CDC suggests, for instance, that health care providers in rural areas:
- Screen patients for high blood pressure and make control a quality improvement goal;
- Increase cancer prevention and early detection—for example, by participating in state-level comprehensive control coalitions, which focus on prevention, education, screening, access, support, and overall good health;
- Encourage physical activity and healthy eating to reduce obesity;
- Encourage patients to stop smoking;
- Promote vehicle safety (rural residents are less likely to use seatbelts); and
- Engage in safe prescribing of opioids for pain, and use nonpharmacologic therapies
The report and a companion commentary are part of a new rural health series in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The Health Resources and Services Administration, which houses the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, will collaborate with the CDC on the series and help promote the findings and recommendations to rural communities.
Americans who live in rural areas are more likely than their urban counterparts are to die of the 5 leading causes of death, according to a CDC study of data from the National Vital Statistics System.
In 2014, 25,000 rural residents died of heart disease, 19,000 of cancer, 12,000 of unintentional injuries, 11,000 of chronic lower respiratory disease, and 4,000 of stroke. The study also found that unintentional injury deaths were about 50% higher in rural areas than in urban areas, partly due to a greater risk of death in vehicle crashes and of opioid overdoses. The problem is compounded by the fact that the distance between health care facilities and trauma centers can make rapid access to specialized health care difficult.
The study researchers say several factors could influence the rural-urban gap. For instance, many of the deaths are associated with sociodemographic differences. Rural residents tend to be older, poorer, and sicker with limited physical activity due to chronic conditions. But that “striking gap” in health can be closed, says CDC Director Tom Frieden, MD, MPH, by better understanding and addressing the health threats that put rural Americans at risk.
CDC suggests, for instance, that health care providers in rural areas:
- Screen patients for high blood pressure and make control a quality improvement goal;
- Increase cancer prevention and early detection—for example, by participating in state-level comprehensive control coalitions, which focus on prevention, education, screening, access, support, and overall good health;
- Encourage physical activity and healthy eating to reduce obesity;
- Encourage patients to stop smoking;
- Promote vehicle safety (rural residents are less likely to use seatbelts); and
- Engage in safe prescribing of opioids for pain, and use nonpharmacologic therapies
The report and a companion commentary are part of a new rural health series in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The Health Resources and Services Administration, which houses the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, will collaborate with the CDC on the series and help promote the findings and recommendations to rural communities.
Americans who live in rural areas are more likely than their urban counterparts are to die of the 5 leading causes of death, according to a CDC study of data from the National Vital Statistics System.
In 2014, 25,000 rural residents died of heart disease, 19,000 of cancer, 12,000 of unintentional injuries, 11,000 of chronic lower respiratory disease, and 4,000 of stroke. The study also found that unintentional injury deaths were about 50% higher in rural areas than in urban areas, partly due to a greater risk of death in vehicle crashes and of opioid overdoses. The problem is compounded by the fact that the distance between health care facilities and trauma centers can make rapid access to specialized health care difficult.
The study researchers say several factors could influence the rural-urban gap. For instance, many of the deaths are associated with sociodemographic differences. Rural residents tend to be older, poorer, and sicker with limited physical activity due to chronic conditions. But that “striking gap” in health can be closed, says CDC Director Tom Frieden, MD, MPH, by better understanding and addressing the health threats that put rural Americans at risk.
CDC suggests, for instance, that health care providers in rural areas:
- Screen patients for high blood pressure and make control a quality improvement goal;
- Increase cancer prevention and early detection—for example, by participating in state-level comprehensive control coalitions, which focus on prevention, education, screening, access, support, and overall good health;
- Encourage physical activity and healthy eating to reduce obesity;
- Encourage patients to stop smoking;
- Promote vehicle safety (rural residents are less likely to use seatbelts); and
- Engage in safe prescribing of opioids for pain, and use nonpharmacologic therapies
The report and a companion commentary are part of a new rural health series in CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. The Health Resources and Services Administration, which houses the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, will collaborate with the CDC on the series and help promote the findings and recommendations to rural communities.
Daptomycin safe, effective for pediatric cSSSI treatment
, according to Dr. John Bradley of the University of California, San Diego, and his associates.
A total of 389 cSSSI patients were included in the study, with 257 receiving daptomycin and 132 receiving standard-of-care (SOC) treatment (mostly vancomycin or clindamycin). Clinical success rates were similar for both groups, at 91% in the daptomycin group and 87% in the SOC group. Therapeutic success rates also were similar, at 97% in the daptomycin group and 99% in the SOC group.
“Daptomycin is a suitable once-daily alternative to vancomycin or clindamycin in the pediatric setting, particularly for suspected or confirmed MRSA [methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] infections,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in Pediatrics (doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2477).
, according to Dr. John Bradley of the University of California, San Diego, and his associates.
A total of 389 cSSSI patients were included in the study, with 257 receiving daptomycin and 132 receiving standard-of-care (SOC) treatment (mostly vancomycin or clindamycin). Clinical success rates were similar for both groups, at 91% in the daptomycin group and 87% in the SOC group. Therapeutic success rates also were similar, at 97% in the daptomycin group and 99% in the SOC group.
“Daptomycin is a suitable once-daily alternative to vancomycin or clindamycin in the pediatric setting, particularly for suspected or confirmed MRSA [methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] infections,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in Pediatrics (doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2477).
, according to Dr. John Bradley of the University of California, San Diego, and his associates.
A total of 389 cSSSI patients were included in the study, with 257 receiving daptomycin and 132 receiving standard-of-care (SOC) treatment (mostly vancomycin or clindamycin). Clinical success rates were similar for both groups, at 91% in the daptomycin group and 87% in the SOC group. Therapeutic success rates also were similar, at 97% in the daptomycin group and 99% in the SOC group.
“Daptomycin is a suitable once-daily alternative to vancomycin or clindamycin in the pediatric setting, particularly for suspected or confirmed MRSA [methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] infections,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in Pediatrics (doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2477).
FROM PEDIATRICS
Community-based palliative care reduces hospitalizations
Clinical question: Does proactive home- and clinic-based palliative care impact hospital use and health care cost in Medicare Advantage beneficiaries?
Background: Studies demonstrate that community-based palliative care is becoming more common because of the need to better deliver individualized care, the positive effects on patient experience and outcomes, and payment model changes exerting pressure to reduce hospital use and cost.
Study design: Observational, retrospective study using propensity-based matching.
Setting: Southern California Health System.
Synopsis: Using the health systems’ databases of 368 community-based palliative care participants compared with 1,075 matched, non–palliative care individuals, this study showed that community-based palliative care participants had less hospital use and lower hospital costs than did the non–palliative care participants, which drove lower overall health care costs.
Hospitalists managing patients with acute exacerbations of chronic diseases and cancer should consider referral to ambulatory palliative care or comprehensive transitional care programs.
Bottom line: Proactive, ambulatory patient-centered palliative care lowers hospitalizations and end-of-life care costs.
Citations: Cassel JB, Kerr KM, McClish DK, et al. Effect of a Home-Based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and Costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 64:2288-2295, 2016.
Dr. McAllister is a hospitalist, assistant professor of medicine, and medical director of transitional care in the Department of Hospital Medicine at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, N.J.
Clinical question: Does proactive home- and clinic-based palliative care impact hospital use and health care cost in Medicare Advantage beneficiaries?
Background: Studies demonstrate that community-based palliative care is becoming more common because of the need to better deliver individualized care, the positive effects on patient experience and outcomes, and payment model changes exerting pressure to reduce hospital use and cost.
Study design: Observational, retrospective study using propensity-based matching.
Setting: Southern California Health System.
Synopsis: Using the health systems’ databases of 368 community-based palliative care participants compared with 1,075 matched, non–palliative care individuals, this study showed that community-based palliative care participants had less hospital use and lower hospital costs than did the non–palliative care participants, which drove lower overall health care costs.
Hospitalists managing patients with acute exacerbations of chronic diseases and cancer should consider referral to ambulatory palliative care or comprehensive transitional care programs.
Bottom line: Proactive, ambulatory patient-centered palliative care lowers hospitalizations and end-of-life care costs.
Citations: Cassel JB, Kerr KM, McClish DK, et al. Effect of a Home-Based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and Costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 64:2288-2295, 2016.
Dr. McAllister is a hospitalist, assistant professor of medicine, and medical director of transitional care in the Department of Hospital Medicine at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, N.J.
Clinical question: Does proactive home- and clinic-based palliative care impact hospital use and health care cost in Medicare Advantage beneficiaries?
Background: Studies demonstrate that community-based palliative care is becoming more common because of the need to better deliver individualized care, the positive effects on patient experience and outcomes, and payment model changes exerting pressure to reduce hospital use and cost.
Study design: Observational, retrospective study using propensity-based matching.
Setting: Southern California Health System.
Synopsis: Using the health systems’ databases of 368 community-based palliative care participants compared with 1,075 matched, non–palliative care individuals, this study showed that community-based palliative care participants had less hospital use and lower hospital costs than did the non–palliative care participants, which drove lower overall health care costs.
Hospitalists managing patients with acute exacerbations of chronic diseases and cancer should consider referral to ambulatory palliative care or comprehensive transitional care programs.
Bottom line: Proactive, ambulatory patient-centered palliative care lowers hospitalizations and end-of-life care costs.
Citations: Cassel JB, Kerr KM, McClish DK, et al. Effect of a Home-Based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and Costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 64:2288-2295, 2016.
Dr. McAllister is a hospitalist, assistant professor of medicine, and medical director of transitional care in the Department of Hospital Medicine at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, N.J.
Artificial intelligence, CNN, and diagnosing melanomas
I have a breakthrough article to share with you. It’s about a technology that detects skin cancer. Before I tell you about that, however, I need to teach you a few things. For example, do you know what AI is? How about machine learning? What about CNN? (This column is a nonpolitical arena, so, no, not that CNN).
AI stands for artificial intelligence. We are surrounded by it everywhere – computers, cars, and cell phones all use AI. AI describes a machine with the ability to problem solve, to create, to understand, to learn. These are characteristics we call “intelligence,” hence, artificial intelligence.
You and I intuitively know that a picture of a chair is a chair. This is true of an folding chair, a Barcelona chair, or a Ghost chair. This ability – to intuit – is a hallmark of humans. Computers don’t intuit, they learn. We don’t need to study 3 million chairs to identify chairs. (Nor could we study 3 million pictures of chairs, a feat that would take years.) Computers, in contrast, can review 3 million pictures of chairs. And learn. In minutes.
Not only do computers learn from millions of examples, they also layer learning. For example, one set of programs will look only for lines that appear to be legs of chairs. This information is then passed on to another layer of programming that can look for seats, then another for backs, then another and another until a final layer puts it together. Do these layers remind you of something we all learned in medical school? It is analogous to the mammalian visual cortex! In the brain, one layer of neurons talks with another. In machines, one layer of programs pushes information to another. We call these machine layers “neural networks.” A convoluted neural network or CNN, therefore, describes a complex network that is analogous to brain cortex. The implications are astounding.
Things get interesting when a CNN is given a complex task to learn and a massive observational data set to learn on. With recent advances in chips called GPUs, deeply nested program layers can accomplish difficult tasks like recognizing faces, understanding voices, and avoiding a bicyclist on a foggy day. Self-driving cars, airport security, and voice-activated assistants all rely on this “deep learning.” And they are getting smarter everyday.
So, now when I say a team at Stanford University has used a CNN and deep learning to diagnose melanoma from pictures, you’ll understand what I mean. And you’ll realize computers can do something heretofore unthinkable – make diagnoses as accurately as a doctor. That story should make you both a little giddy and afraid. But wait, there’s more! Read all about it next time.
Dr. Benabio is a partner physician and chief of service for the department of dermatology of the Southern California Permanente Group in San Diego. Dr. Benabio is @Dermdoc on Twitter. Write to him at [email protected] . He has no disclosures related to this column.
I have a breakthrough article to share with you. It’s about a technology that detects skin cancer. Before I tell you about that, however, I need to teach you a few things. For example, do you know what AI is? How about machine learning? What about CNN? (This column is a nonpolitical arena, so, no, not that CNN).
AI stands for artificial intelligence. We are surrounded by it everywhere – computers, cars, and cell phones all use AI. AI describes a machine with the ability to problem solve, to create, to understand, to learn. These are characteristics we call “intelligence,” hence, artificial intelligence.
You and I intuitively know that a picture of a chair is a chair. This is true of an folding chair, a Barcelona chair, or a Ghost chair. This ability – to intuit – is a hallmark of humans. Computers don’t intuit, they learn. We don’t need to study 3 million chairs to identify chairs. (Nor could we study 3 million pictures of chairs, a feat that would take years.) Computers, in contrast, can review 3 million pictures of chairs. And learn. In minutes.
Not only do computers learn from millions of examples, they also layer learning. For example, one set of programs will look only for lines that appear to be legs of chairs. This information is then passed on to another layer of programming that can look for seats, then another for backs, then another and another until a final layer puts it together. Do these layers remind you of something we all learned in medical school? It is analogous to the mammalian visual cortex! In the brain, one layer of neurons talks with another. In machines, one layer of programs pushes information to another. We call these machine layers “neural networks.” A convoluted neural network or CNN, therefore, describes a complex network that is analogous to brain cortex. The implications are astounding.
Things get interesting when a CNN is given a complex task to learn and a massive observational data set to learn on. With recent advances in chips called GPUs, deeply nested program layers can accomplish difficult tasks like recognizing faces, understanding voices, and avoiding a bicyclist on a foggy day. Self-driving cars, airport security, and voice-activated assistants all rely on this “deep learning.” And they are getting smarter everyday.
So, now when I say a team at Stanford University has used a CNN and deep learning to diagnose melanoma from pictures, you’ll understand what I mean. And you’ll realize computers can do something heretofore unthinkable – make diagnoses as accurately as a doctor. That story should make you both a little giddy and afraid. But wait, there’s more! Read all about it next time.
Dr. Benabio is a partner physician and chief of service for the department of dermatology of the Southern California Permanente Group in San Diego. Dr. Benabio is @Dermdoc on Twitter. Write to him at [email protected] . He has no disclosures related to this column.
I have a breakthrough article to share with you. It’s about a technology that detects skin cancer. Before I tell you about that, however, I need to teach you a few things. For example, do you know what AI is? How about machine learning? What about CNN? (This column is a nonpolitical arena, so, no, not that CNN).
AI stands for artificial intelligence. We are surrounded by it everywhere – computers, cars, and cell phones all use AI. AI describes a machine with the ability to problem solve, to create, to understand, to learn. These are characteristics we call “intelligence,” hence, artificial intelligence.
You and I intuitively know that a picture of a chair is a chair. This is true of an folding chair, a Barcelona chair, or a Ghost chair. This ability – to intuit – is a hallmark of humans. Computers don’t intuit, they learn. We don’t need to study 3 million chairs to identify chairs. (Nor could we study 3 million pictures of chairs, a feat that would take years.) Computers, in contrast, can review 3 million pictures of chairs. And learn. In minutes.
Not only do computers learn from millions of examples, they also layer learning. For example, one set of programs will look only for lines that appear to be legs of chairs. This information is then passed on to another layer of programming that can look for seats, then another for backs, then another and another until a final layer puts it together. Do these layers remind you of something we all learned in medical school? It is analogous to the mammalian visual cortex! In the brain, one layer of neurons talks with another. In machines, one layer of programs pushes information to another. We call these machine layers “neural networks.” A convoluted neural network or CNN, therefore, describes a complex network that is analogous to brain cortex. The implications are astounding.
Things get interesting when a CNN is given a complex task to learn and a massive observational data set to learn on. With recent advances in chips called GPUs, deeply nested program layers can accomplish difficult tasks like recognizing faces, understanding voices, and avoiding a bicyclist on a foggy day. Self-driving cars, airport security, and voice-activated assistants all rely on this “deep learning.” And they are getting smarter everyday.
So, now when I say a team at Stanford University has used a CNN and deep learning to diagnose melanoma from pictures, you’ll understand what I mean. And you’ll realize computers can do something heretofore unthinkable – make diagnoses as accurately as a doctor. That story should make you both a little giddy and afraid. But wait, there’s more! Read all about it next time.
Dr. Benabio is a partner physician and chief of service for the department of dermatology of the Southern California Permanente Group in San Diego. Dr. Benabio is @Dermdoc on Twitter. Write to him at [email protected] . He has no disclosures related to this column.
Cost equilibrium in Canada: Inpatient and outpatient treatment of herpes zoster
Rates of herpes zoster infections have increased substantially since the late 1990s in Canada. This, combined with rising per-episode medical costs and constant per-episode drug costs has led to increased total outpatient costs. But this has been offset by a dramatic drop in hospitalization rates and costs, according to a study published by BMC Infectious Diseases.
“A number of recent studies have looked at the burden of HZ-PHN [herpes zoster–postherpetic neuralgia] in a variety of health care systems, including Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Israel. However, little recent Canadian data have been published,” wrote Kevin J. Friesen, MD, and his associates at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, explaining that the goal of this study was to “establish the current burden of HZ and PHN in the setting of a universal health care system, and to look at long-term trends in their treatment costs.”
From 1997-1998 through 2013-2014, there were a total of 73,886 HZ incidents. In the final year alone, incidents numbered 5,746, which represents a 49.5% increase over 1997-1998. From the first year through 2009-2010, age-adjusted rates increased at a rate of 4.7 episodes per 1,000 person-years, but after that point, that rate increased to 5.7 episodes per 1,000 person-years, and continued that way through 2013-2014 (BMC Infect Dis. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2185-3).
Over the same 15-year time period, costs for drugs increased from an average of $89.77 to $127.34 per incident (P less than .03). Total medical costs increased from $57.98 to $78.84 per incident (P less than .00001).
However, the total annual cost of treating HZ and PHN dipped, particularly in 2011-2012, when it was $1,997,183, compared with $2,095,633 in the first year. Hospitalization rates also declined, going from 3.1% in 1997-1998 to 1.36% in 2011-2012 and bringing mean per-episode cost for the hospital down from $397 to $195.
“The combination of these trends in per-episode costs arising from medical care and drug treatment were multiplied by the increase in the annual incidence of HZ, causing total outpatient costs to increase,” the authors explained. “However, this increase was offset by the dramatic drop in rates of hospitalization and the resulting decrease in hospital costs.”
The study was funded by a grant from Merck Canada. Dr. Friesen and his coauthors did not report any relevant financial disclosures.
Rates of herpes zoster infections have increased substantially since the late 1990s in Canada. This, combined with rising per-episode medical costs and constant per-episode drug costs has led to increased total outpatient costs. But this has been offset by a dramatic drop in hospitalization rates and costs, according to a study published by BMC Infectious Diseases.
“A number of recent studies have looked at the burden of HZ-PHN [herpes zoster–postherpetic neuralgia] in a variety of health care systems, including Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Israel. However, little recent Canadian data have been published,” wrote Kevin J. Friesen, MD, and his associates at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, explaining that the goal of this study was to “establish the current burden of HZ and PHN in the setting of a universal health care system, and to look at long-term trends in their treatment costs.”
From 1997-1998 through 2013-2014, there were a total of 73,886 HZ incidents. In the final year alone, incidents numbered 5,746, which represents a 49.5% increase over 1997-1998. From the first year through 2009-2010, age-adjusted rates increased at a rate of 4.7 episodes per 1,000 person-years, but after that point, that rate increased to 5.7 episodes per 1,000 person-years, and continued that way through 2013-2014 (BMC Infect Dis. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2185-3).
Over the same 15-year time period, costs for drugs increased from an average of $89.77 to $127.34 per incident (P less than .03). Total medical costs increased from $57.98 to $78.84 per incident (P less than .00001).
However, the total annual cost of treating HZ and PHN dipped, particularly in 2011-2012, when it was $1,997,183, compared with $2,095,633 in the first year. Hospitalization rates also declined, going from 3.1% in 1997-1998 to 1.36% in 2011-2012 and bringing mean per-episode cost for the hospital down from $397 to $195.
“The combination of these trends in per-episode costs arising from medical care and drug treatment were multiplied by the increase in the annual incidence of HZ, causing total outpatient costs to increase,” the authors explained. “However, this increase was offset by the dramatic drop in rates of hospitalization and the resulting decrease in hospital costs.”
The study was funded by a grant from Merck Canada. Dr. Friesen and his coauthors did not report any relevant financial disclosures.
Rates of herpes zoster infections have increased substantially since the late 1990s in Canada. This, combined with rising per-episode medical costs and constant per-episode drug costs has led to increased total outpatient costs. But this has been offset by a dramatic drop in hospitalization rates and costs, according to a study published by BMC Infectious Diseases.
“A number of recent studies have looked at the burden of HZ-PHN [herpes zoster–postherpetic neuralgia] in a variety of health care systems, including Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and Israel. However, little recent Canadian data have been published,” wrote Kevin J. Friesen, MD, and his associates at the University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, explaining that the goal of this study was to “establish the current burden of HZ and PHN in the setting of a universal health care system, and to look at long-term trends in their treatment costs.”
From 1997-1998 through 2013-2014, there were a total of 73,886 HZ incidents. In the final year alone, incidents numbered 5,746, which represents a 49.5% increase over 1997-1998. From the first year through 2009-2010, age-adjusted rates increased at a rate of 4.7 episodes per 1,000 person-years, but after that point, that rate increased to 5.7 episodes per 1,000 person-years, and continued that way through 2013-2014 (BMC Infect Dis. 2017. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2185-3).
Over the same 15-year time period, costs for drugs increased from an average of $89.77 to $127.34 per incident (P less than .03). Total medical costs increased from $57.98 to $78.84 per incident (P less than .00001).
However, the total annual cost of treating HZ and PHN dipped, particularly in 2011-2012, when it was $1,997,183, compared with $2,095,633 in the first year. Hospitalization rates also declined, going from 3.1% in 1997-1998 to 1.36% in 2011-2012 and bringing mean per-episode cost for the hospital down from $397 to $195.
“The combination of these trends in per-episode costs arising from medical care and drug treatment were multiplied by the increase in the annual incidence of HZ, causing total outpatient costs to increase,” the authors explained. “However, this increase was offset by the dramatic drop in rates of hospitalization and the resulting decrease in hospital costs.”
The study was funded by a grant from Merck Canada. Dr. Friesen and his coauthors did not report any relevant financial disclosures.
FROM BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Key clinical point: Increasing herpes zoster rates combined with rising per-episode medical costs and constant per-episode drug costs has led to increased total outpatient costs. But this has been offset by a dramatic drop in hospitalization rates and costs.
Major finding: Incidence of herpes zoster between 1997-1998 and 2013-2014 increased by 49.5% in Canada.
Data source: Observational cohort study of data from the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy between April 1, 1997 and March 31, 2014.
Disclosures: Funded via grant from Merck Canada. Authors reported no relevant financial disclosures.
MedPAC leaning toward hybrid for paying for Part B drugs
WASHINGTON – The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission is putting the finishing touches on a recommendation for a hybrid approach to reforming how Medicare pays doctors for drugs administered in the office.
If adopted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, MedPAC’s recommendations first would refine the current system which pays physicians for Medicare Part B drugs based on the average sales price (ASP), then eventually would allow physicians to either remain in the improved ASP system or switch to a drug value program (DVP), a revamped version of the failed Competitive Acquisition Program.
Under the potential MedPAC recommendations, new drugs – those that do not have an ASP – would be paid at wholesale acquisition cost plus 3%, which MedPAC staff said is more in line the standard ASP plus 6%.
To help stem the impact of pricing increases, the proposal calls on manufacturers to provide additional rebates when ASP growth exceeds inflation. This approach is commonly used by states collecting Medicaid drug rebates.
Finally, the proposal would consolidate billing codes to help foster competition. The plan would combine billing codes for a brand name drug and all associated generics, as well as combining biosimilars with their reference biologic products. Commission staff highlighted two cases where combining codes for a biologic/biosimilar would have an impact: Medicare’s payment rate for the biosimilar filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio) declined by 20% during the first 6 quarters on the market while the reference product (Neupogen) remained static. Further, first quarter of pricing data on the biosimilar infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra) is 22% greater than the reference product (Remicade).
MedPAC is likely to recommend that, as those changes go into effect, CMS develop the DVP, which would be voluntary beginning in 2022. In parallel with the launch of DVP, MedPAC is likely to recommend that CMS reduce the add-on percentage in the ASP program, as a stick to drive DVP participation.
Under the DVP, physicians would contract with one of a number of vendors that would negotiate prices for physicians and offer opportunities for shared savings.
Physicians would buy their drugs at the vendor-negotiated price from a network of wholesalers and distributors. Vendors would have additional negotiation tools such as formularies, step therapy, and prior authorization, and a price cap of 100% of ASP. Medicare would pay physicians at the DVP rate without any add-ons, but physicians would continue to receive fees for administrative services under the physician fee schedule or the outpatient prospective payment system.
The recommendations received general support from the MedPAC commissioners, but some of the finer details were met with concerns.
One was the possible impact of the ongoing budget sequestration, which lowers total payments from the government by 2%.
“I think the possibility that the sequester will still be in effect really casts a pall over proposals like [wholesale acquisition cost plus 3%], and we just have to think about what wording we’re going to use,” Commissioner Paul Ginsburg, PhD, of the Brookings Institution, said. “We realize that if a sequester is still in effect, we might have to make a temporary change.”
Another aspect of the DVP that raised questions was an arbitration process that would allow prices to be challenged for sole-source products.
Commissioner Amy Bricker, vice president of supply chain strategy at Express Scripts, said she was “not in favor of the arbitration,” questioning its administrative burden, cost, and turn-around time for decisions. She added that rather than arbitration, “I would like to see us provide incentives to manufacturers to bring competition to the market versus trying to create a system that doesn’t exist today for us to go to court.”
Regarding the DVP, Commissioner Jack Hoadley, PhD, research professor at Georgetown University, Washington, said that he is “not convinced that this process is going to work,” but acknowledged the MedPAC staff’s work in developing it. “It does feel like it’s worth putting out there and trying to see if it happens or trying to set it up to happen.”
MedPAC Vice Chairman Jon Christianson, PhD, of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, concurred. “I think we should go ahead and continue to explore that, but maybe temper our enthusiasm a little bit,” questioning how effective multiple groups would be in negotiating separately for Medicare drug pricing.
Commissioner William Hall, MD, of the University of Rochester, N.Y., also questioned the effect on patients. “Do any of these manipulations really have a direct correlation to quality of care for the patient population that is most affected by Part B?” he asked.
MedPAC staff will take the commissioners’ comments on these options and refine them for the upcoming March 2-3 meeting and will present the final recommendations to the commissioners to vote on in April for inclusion in the June report to Congress.
WASHINGTON – The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission is putting the finishing touches on a recommendation for a hybrid approach to reforming how Medicare pays doctors for drugs administered in the office.
If adopted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, MedPAC’s recommendations first would refine the current system which pays physicians for Medicare Part B drugs based on the average sales price (ASP), then eventually would allow physicians to either remain in the improved ASP system or switch to a drug value program (DVP), a revamped version of the failed Competitive Acquisition Program.
Under the potential MedPAC recommendations, new drugs – those that do not have an ASP – would be paid at wholesale acquisition cost plus 3%, which MedPAC staff said is more in line the standard ASP plus 6%.
To help stem the impact of pricing increases, the proposal calls on manufacturers to provide additional rebates when ASP growth exceeds inflation. This approach is commonly used by states collecting Medicaid drug rebates.
Finally, the proposal would consolidate billing codes to help foster competition. The plan would combine billing codes for a brand name drug and all associated generics, as well as combining biosimilars with their reference biologic products. Commission staff highlighted two cases where combining codes for a biologic/biosimilar would have an impact: Medicare’s payment rate for the biosimilar filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio) declined by 20% during the first 6 quarters on the market while the reference product (Neupogen) remained static. Further, first quarter of pricing data on the biosimilar infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra) is 22% greater than the reference product (Remicade).
MedPAC is likely to recommend that, as those changes go into effect, CMS develop the DVP, which would be voluntary beginning in 2022. In parallel with the launch of DVP, MedPAC is likely to recommend that CMS reduce the add-on percentage in the ASP program, as a stick to drive DVP participation.
Under the DVP, physicians would contract with one of a number of vendors that would negotiate prices for physicians and offer opportunities for shared savings.
Physicians would buy their drugs at the vendor-negotiated price from a network of wholesalers and distributors. Vendors would have additional negotiation tools such as formularies, step therapy, and prior authorization, and a price cap of 100% of ASP. Medicare would pay physicians at the DVP rate without any add-ons, but physicians would continue to receive fees for administrative services under the physician fee schedule or the outpatient prospective payment system.
The recommendations received general support from the MedPAC commissioners, but some of the finer details were met with concerns.
One was the possible impact of the ongoing budget sequestration, which lowers total payments from the government by 2%.
“I think the possibility that the sequester will still be in effect really casts a pall over proposals like [wholesale acquisition cost plus 3%], and we just have to think about what wording we’re going to use,” Commissioner Paul Ginsburg, PhD, of the Brookings Institution, said. “We realize that if a sequester is still in effect, we might have to make a temporary change.”
Another aspect of the DVP that raised questions was an arbitration process that would allow prices to be challenged for sole-source products.
Commissioner Amy Bricker, vice president of supply chain strategy at Express Scripts, said she was “not in favor of the arbitration,” questioning its administrative burden, cost, and turn-around time for decisions. She added that rather than arbitration, “I would like to see us provide incentives to manufacturers to bring competition to the market versus trying to create a system that doesn’t exist today for us to go to court.”
Regarding the DVP, Commissioner Jack Hoadley, PhD, research professor at Georgetown University, Washington, said that he is “not convinced that this process is going to work,” but acknowledged the MedPAC staff’s work in developing it. “It does feel like it’s worth putting out there and trying to see if it happens or trying to set it up to happen.”
MedPAC Vice Chairman Jon Christianson, PhD, of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, concurred. “I think we should go ahead and continue to explore that, but maybe temper our enthusiasm a little bit,” questioning how effective multiple groups would be in negotiating separately for Medicare drug pricing.
Commissioner William Hall, MD, of the University of Rochester, N.Y., also questioned the effect on patients. “Do any of these manipulations really have a direct correlation to quality of care for the patient population that is most affected by Part B?” he asked.
MedPAC staff will take the commissioners’ comments on these options and refine them for the upcoming March 2-3 meeting and will present the final recommendations to the commissioners to vote on in April for inclusion in the June report to Congress.
WASHINGTON – The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission is putting the finishing touches on a recommendation for a hybrid approach to reforming how Medicare pays doctors for drugs administered in the office.
If adopted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, MedPAC’s recommendations first would refine the current system which pays physicians for Medicare Part B drugs based on the average sales price (ASP), then eventually would allow physicians to either remain in the improved ASP system or switch to a drug value program (DVP), a revamped version of the failed Competitive Acquisition Program.
Under the potential MedPAC recommendations, new drugs – those that do not have an ASP – would be paid at wholesale acquisition cost plus 3%, which MedPAC staff said is more in line the standard ASP plus 6%.
To help stem the impact of pricing increases, the proposal calls on manufacturers to provide additional rebates when ASP growth exceeds inflation. This approach is commonly used by states collecting Medicaid drug rebates.
Finally, the proposal would consolidate billing codes to help foster competition. The plan would combine billing codes for a brand name drug and all associated generics, as well as combining biosimilars with their reference biologic products. Commission staff highlighted two cases where combining codes for a biologic/biosimilar would have an impact: Medicare’s payment rate for the biosimilar filgrastim-sndz (Zarxio) declined by 20% during the first 6 quarters on the market while the reference product (Neupogen) remained static. Further, first quarter of pricing data on the biosimilar infliximab-dyyb (Inflectra) is 22% greater than the reference product (Remicade).
MedPAC is likely to recommend that, as those changes go into effect, CMS develop the DVP, which would be voluntary beginning in 2022. In parallel with the launch of DVP, MedPAC is likely to recommend that CMS reduce the add-on percentage in the ASP program, as a stick to drive DVP participation.
Under the DVP, physicians would contract with one of a number of vendors that would negotiate prices for physicians and offer opportunities for shared savings.
Physicians would buy their drugs at the vendor-negotiated price from a network of wholesalers and distributors. Vendors would have additional negotiation tools such as formularies, step therapy, and prior authorization, and a price cap of 100% of ASP. Medicare would pay physicians at the DVP rate without any add-ons, but physicians would continue to receive fees for administrative services under the physician fee schedule or the outpatient prospective payment system.
The recommendations received general support from the MedPAC commissioners, but some of the finer details were met with concerns.
One was the possible impact of the ongoing budget sequestration, which lowers total payments from the government by 2%.
“I think the possibility that the sequester will still be in effect really casts a pall over proposals like [wholesale acquisition cost plus 3%], and we just have to think about what wording we’re going to use,” Commissioner Paul Ginsburg, PhD, of the Brookings Institution, said. “We realize that if a sequester is still in effect, we might have to make a temporary change.”
Another aspect of the DVP that raised questions was an arbitration process that would allow prices to be challenged for sole-source products.
Commissioner Amy Bricker, vice president of supply chain strategy at Express Scripts, said she was “not in favor of the arbitration,” questioning its administrative burden, cost, and turn-around time for decisions. She added that rather than arbitration, “I would like to see us provide incentives to manufacturers to bring competition to the market versus trying to create a system that doesn’t exist today for us to go to court.”
Regarding the DVP, Commissioner Jack Hoadley, PhD, research professor at Georgetown University, Washington, said that he is “not convinced that this process is going to work,” but acknowledged the MedPAC staff’s work in developing it. “It does feel like it’s worth putting out there and trying to see if it happens or trying to set it up to happen.”
MedPAC Vice Chairman Jon Christianson, PhD, of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, concurred. “I think we should go ahead and continue to explore that, but maybe temper our enthusiasm a little bit,” questioning how effective multiple groups would be in negotiating separately for Medicare drug pricing.
Commissioner William Hall, MD, of the University of Rochester, N.Y., also questioned the effect on patients. “Do any of these manipulations really have a direct correlation to quality of care for the patient population that is most affected by Part B?” he asked.
MedPAC staff will take the commissioners’ comments on these options and refine them for the upcoming March 2-3 meeting and will present the final recommendations to the commissioners to vote on in April for inclusion in the June report to Congress.
AT A MEDPAC MEETING
Antibiotic use may hamper checkpoint inhibitors for mRCC
Antibiotics may hamper the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, according to a small, retrospective study. Using antibiotics within 1 month of starting a checkpoint inhibitor was associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival, as well as a trend toward shorter overall survival, in a study of 80 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although the mechanism remains unknown, the prevailing theory is that antibiotics adversely alter the composition of the gut microbiome, and in so doing, slash the ability of beneficial bacteria to boost efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade.
“The data I presented today are just preliminary. But the results are really important because there is a kind of connection between the microbiome, antibiotics, and immune checkpoint blockade,” Lisa Derosa, MD, of Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France, said during a press briefing prior to the 2017 genitourinary cancers symposium sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASTRO, and the Society of Urologic Oncology.
Dr. Derosa and her colleagues retrospectively assessed 80 people with metastatic renal cell carcinoma enrolled in prospective trials at Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute. The patients were treated with the PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination. The researchers compared survival of 16 patients who also received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy within 1 month of their first dose of immunotherapy with 64 others who did not receive antibiotics.
Progression-free survival was significantly shorter for patients in the antibiotic group, 2.3 months versus 8.1 months for the nonantibiotic group (P less than .001) on Kaplan-Meier curves. The statistical significance persisted even after the researchers controlled for age, gender, International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification, tumor burden, and PPI use in a multivariate analysis. Similarly, the objective response rate to checkpoint inhibition therapy was significantly lower among patients in the antibiotic group (P less than .002).
“There was no significant difference, however, between these groups in overall survival,” Dr. Derosa said.
Despite the findings, Dr. Derosa said it’s too soon to say antibiotics are contraindicated in this patient population. “It may be important to pay attention to these antibiotics in patients treated with immune response inhibitors, but the data are still preliminary.”
“I would propose this data is very intriguing, but it was retrospectively generated, so I consider it hypothesis-generating,” said Sumanta Pal, MD, of City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., and moderator of the press briefing. “One has to consider the fact that antibiotics are used under circumstances of medical necessity. I wouldn’t forgo treatment of any active infection … I would use as medically necessary.”
Beta-lactamases and fluoroquinolones comprised the majority of antibiotics in the study. The majority, 67 patients, received immune monotherapy with single-agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Another 10 patients received a combination of a PD-1 inhibitor and a CTLA-4 inhibitor, and 3 were treated with a PD-L1 inhibitor and bevacizumab.
“This is the first analysis evaluating impact of antibiotics on outcome of advanced renal carcinoma patients treated in the era of immune checkpoint blockade,” Dr. Derosa said. “We have a lot of work to do.” She and her colleagues plan to continue enrolling patients in the study. They also plan to evaluate whether alteration of the microbiome composition does play a role in diminishing the effectiveness of immunotherapy, and if so, which types of bacteria are the most likely culprits.
Antibiotics may hamper the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, according to a small, retrospective study. Using antibiotics within 1 month of starting a checkpoint inhibitor was associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival, as well as a trend toward shorter overall survival, in a study of 80 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although the mechanism remains unknown, the prevailing theory is that antibiotics adversely alter the composition of the gut microbiome, and in so doing, slash the ability of beneficial bacteria to boost efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade.
“The data I presented today are just preliminary. But the results are really important because there is a kind of connection between the microbiome, antibiotics, and immune checkpoint blockade,” Lisa Derosa, MD, of Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France, said during a press briefing prior to the 2017 genitourinary cancers symposium sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASTRO, and the Society of Urologic Oncology.
Dr. Derosa and her colleagues retrospectively assessed 80 people with metastatic renal cell carcinoma enrolled in prospective trials at Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute. The patients were treated with the PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination. The researchers compared survival of 16 patients who also received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy within 1 month of their first dose of immunotherapy with 64 others who did not receive antibiotics.
Progression-free survival was significantly shorter for patients in the antibiotic group, 2.3 months versus 8.1 months for the nonantibiotic group (P less than .001) on Kaplan-Meier curves. The statistical significance persisted even after the researchers controlled for age, gender, International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification, tumor burden, and PPI use in a multivariate analysis. Similarly, the objective response rate to checkpoint inhibition therapy was significantly lower among patients in the antibiotic group (P less than .002).
“There was no significant difference, however, between these groups in overall survival,” Dr. Derosa said.
Despite the findings, Dr. Derosa said it’s too soon to say antibiotics are contraindicated in this patient population. “It may be important to pay attention to these antibiotics in patients treated with immune response inhibitors, but the data are still preliminary.”
“I would propose this data is very intriguing, but it was retrospectively generated, so I consider it hypothesis-generating,” said Sumanta Pal, MD, of City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., and moderator of the press briefing. “One has to consider the fact that antibiotics are used under circumstances of medical necessity. I wouldn’t forgo treatment of any active infection … I would use as medically necessary.”
Beta-lactamases and fluoroquinolones comprised the majority of antibiotics in the study. The majority, 67 patients, received immune monotherapy with single-agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Another 10 patients received a combination of a PD-1 inhibitor and a CTLA-4 inhibitor, and 3 were treated with a PD-L1 inhibitor and bevacizumab.
“This is the first analysis evaluating impact of antibiotics on outcome of advanced renal carcinoma patients treated in the era of immune checkpoint blockade,” Dr. Derosa said. “We have a lot of work to do.” She and her colleagues plan to continue enrolling patients in the study. They also plan to evaluate whether alteration of the microbiome composition does play a role in diminishing the effectiveness of immunotherapy, and if so, which types of bacteria are the most likely culprits.
Antibiotics may hamper the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, according to a small, retrospective study. Using antibiotics within 1 month of starting a checkpoint inhibitor was associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival, as well as a trend toward shorter overall survival, in a study of 80 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although the mechanism remains unknown, the prevailing theory is that antibiotics adversely alter the composition of the gut microbiome, and in so doing, slash the ability of beneficial bacteria to boost efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade.
“The data I presented today are just preliminary. But the results are really important because there is a kind of connection between the microbiome, antibiotics, and immune checkpoint blockade,” Lisa Derosa, MD, of Paris-Sud University, Villejuif, France, said during a press briefing prior to the 2017 genitourinary cancers symposium sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASTRO, and the Society of Urologic Oncology.
Dr. Derosa and her colleagues retrospectively assessed 80 people with metastatic renal cell carcinoma enrolled in prospective trials at Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute. The patients were treated with the PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination. The researchers compared survival of 16 patients who also received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy within 1 month of their first dose of immunotherapy with 64 others who did not receive antibiotics.
Progression-free survival was significantly shorter for patients in the antibiotic group, 2.3 months versus 8.1 months for the nonantibiotic group (P less than .001) on Kaplan-Meier curves. The statistical significance persisted even after the researchers controlled for age, gender, International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification, tumor burden, and PPI use in a multivariate analysis. Similarly, the objective response rate to checkpoint inhibition therapy was significantly lower among patients in the antibiotic group (P less than .002).
“There was no significant difference, however, between these groups in overall survival,” Dr. Derosa said.
Despite the findings, Dr. Derosa said it’s too soon to say antibiotics are contraindicated in this patient population. “It may be important to pay attention to these antibiotics in patients treated with immune response inhibitors, but the data are still preliminary.”
“I would propose this data is very intriguing, but it was retrospectively generated, so I consider it hypothesis-generating,” said Sumanta Pal, MD, of City of Hope Medical Center in Duarte, Calif., and moderator of the press briefing. “One has to consider the fact that antibiotics are used under circumstances of medical necessity. I wouldn’t forgo treatment of any active infection … I would use as medically necessary.”
Beta-lactamases and fluoroquinolones comprised the majority of antibiotics in the study. The majority, 67 patients, received immune monotherapy with single-agent PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Another 10 patients received a combination of a PD-1 inhibitor and a CTLA-4 inhibitor, and 3 were treated with a PD-L1 inhibitor and bevacizumab.
“This is the first analysis evaluating impact of antibiotics on outcome of advanced renal carcinoma patients treated in the era of immune checkpoint blockade,” Dr. Derosa said. “We have a lot of work to do.” She and her colleagues plan to continue enrolling patients in the study. They also plan to evaluate whether alteration of the microbiome composition does play a role in diminishing the effectiveness of immunotherapy, and if so, which types of bacteria are the most likely culprits.
FROM THE GENITOURINARY CANCERS SYMPOSIUM
Key clinical point: The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma may be hampered by antibiotic use.
Major finding: Patients treated with antibiotics had significantly shorter progression-free survival, 2.3 months versus 8.1 months (P less than.001).
Data source: Retrospective study of 80 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Disclosures: The study was supported by grants from the Philanthropia Foundation. Dr. Derosa had no relevant financial disclosures.



