Recommended Reading lists are something of a tradition for ACS Surgery News. This feature has appeared several times over the years and it has always proved among the most popular items in the publication. But the project hinges on input from our Editorial Advisory Board, the members of which are already regularly called upon to help vet the publication’s content and give their advice. They have gone the extra mile and have once again chosen their “Best of 2017” studies in their own specialty areas, along with commentary on why their choices should be of interest to all surgeons. We hope our readers will find the list and the comments of interest.

AlexRaths/Thinkstock

General surgery

Cogbill TH et al. Rural general surgery: A 38-year experience with a regional network established by an integrated health system in the Midwestern United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(1):115-24.

This article is of particular interest because it provides details of an innovative, regional system of surgical care at the critical access hospitals and referral centers that cooperate seamlessly to improve quality of care and quality of practice for rural surgeons. It could serve as a model for similar independent hospitals and practices in a region to improve the practice lives of the surgeons in rural communities and preserve access to local care for rural patients.

Dimou FM et al. Outcomes in older patients with grade III cholecystitis and cholecystostomy tube placement: A propensity score analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(4):502-14.This study is valuable because it sheds light on the current status of treatment of severe acute cholecystitis in the United States and reports outcomes of patients who get initial tube cholecystostomy. It demonstrates potential drawbacks of following the Tokyo Guidelines: fewer patients receiving definitive treatment (cholecystectomy) and higher mortality rates and readmissions.

Karen E. Deveney, MD, FACS

Palliative Care

Gani F et al. Palliative care utilization among patients admitted for gastrointestinal and thoracic cancers. J Palliat Med. 2017 Nov 3; doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0295; epub ahead of print.

Is this a matter of “too little too late”? This retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients identified in the National Inpatient Sample database admitted with a primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal and/or thoracic cancer determined that only 8.5% of patients admitted received palliative care services. Surgical patients were 79% less likely to have received a palliative care consultation, and then only after a prolonged length of stay or postoperative complication. Is referral to palliative care services hindered by its stigmatization with these outcomes?

Taylor LJ et al. A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: Best Case/Worst Case. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(6):531-8.

My chief used to say, “You might not be teachable, but you are trainable!” After surgeons received training in the Best Case/Worst Case framework described in this paper, they demonstrated that it was possible to successfully change the focus of decision-making conversations from an isolated surgical problem – with its menu of technical solutions – instead into a discussion about treatment alternatives and outcomes. This intervention is a useful tool for one of the most invasive procedures of all – an exploration of a patient’s preferences and values that is necessary for shared decision making within the acute setting.

Makhani SS et al. Cognitive impairment and overall survival in frail surgical patients. J Amer Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):590-600.

In my preoperative discussions with families of frail patients, it is often quite evident that the factor driving their decision is the cognitive state of the patient and the consequences of its further decline, even when they are willing to accept the risks of physical frailty. This study in a large multidisciplinary cohort of patients undergoing major operations determined that a combined frailty (Fried frailty score) and cognitive assessment score (Emory Clock Draw Test) has a more powerful potential to predict adult patients at higher risk of overall survival than does either measurement alone. Dual frailty and cognitive screening appears to be a promising adjunct to the shared decision-making process.
 

Geoffrey P. Dunn, MD, FACS

Wilson DG et al. Patterns of care in hospitalized vascular patients at end of life. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):183-90.

This thoughtful study and the excellent accompanying invited commentary by William Schecter, MD, FACS, address a major, difficult issue that faces all physicians as our patients become older and sicker and our ability to keep them alive expands: How do we speak honestly with patients about their prognosis and likely outcomes and honor their autonomy in decision making?
 

Karen E. Deveney, MD, FACS

Practice Management

Robinson JR et al. Complexity of medical decision making in care provided by surgeons through patient portals. Surg Res. 2017;214:93-101.

This article describes an analysis of the content of patient portal messages exchanged between surgical providers and patients. The study demonstrates that more than 90% of these exchanges involved the delivery of medical care, and more than two-thirds of the messages contained medical decision making, which might have generated charges if done in a face-to-face outpatient encounter. The articles argues that surgeons are providing substantial medical care to their patients through patient portal message exchanges and suggests that models for compensation of this type of online care should be developed.

Gretchen Purcell Jackson, MD, FACS

Vascular Surgery

Bennett KM et al. Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher incidence of major adverse clinical events than carotid endarterectomy in female patients. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):794-801.

This article uses the ACS NSQIP database to assess outcomes of women undergoing intervention for carotid stenosis in a real-world setting and finds that major adverse cardiac events in the first 30 days is higher for carotid artery stenting (12.2%), compared with carotid endarterectomy (5.2%). What we need to keep in mind is that the practice of any intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is being reevaluated in the new CREST study, which will compare current best medical management with carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy. The indications are likely to change for all, but because women had less relative risk reduction in the early studies, we can expect that the benefits for intervention for women will continue to be less than those for men, calling to question when we should truly intervene, and how best to do so.

Gargiulo M et al. Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair performed in abdominal aortic aneurysms with large infrarenal necks. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4);1065-72.

This study found that endovascular aneurysm repair, performed in patients with large necks (greater than 28 mm), was associated with further neck enlargement at 2 years, and a higher risk of proximal type I endoleak, with the need for reintervention. This is one of many recent studies, all with similar findings. The issue becomes how we can best address larger infrarenal necks, whether by use of fenestrated grafts, snorkels/chimneys with extension of the seal zone, aptus, or other technologies. The question of whether all grafts have equal impacts on these more dilated necks has still to be elucidated. Nonetheless, when we stretch the instructions for use, there is an increased likelihood for more interventions.

Zettervall SL et al. Renal complications after EVAR with suprarenal versus infrarenal fixation among all users and routine users. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1305.

This study found that endografts with suprarenal fixation were associated with a greater decline in renal function, compared with those with infrarenal fixation, as well as with a longer length of stay. The reasons for the renal function decline are not entirely clear, and there was a slight increase in contrast use for those with suprarenal fixation but were otherwise similar when comparing comorbidities. Clearly, assessment of any impact on long-term renal function is important, and may affect future choice of endografts.

Linda Harris, MD, FACS

Bariatric Surgery

Rosenthal RJ et al. Obesity in America. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Oct;13(10):1643-50.

Although much has been reported on the dramatic benefits of bariatric surgery, it remains a matter of deep disappointment that only 1%-2% of the eligible population is receiving this life-saving therapy. This is a paper that reports and analyzes the results of a national survey that was conducted on behalf of the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, in an attempt to identify barriers to access, public misconceptions on obesity and its consequences, and other pertinent factors. Survey results included the findings that, although 80% of Americans considered obesity as the most serious health risk problem, there was a clear overestimation of the effectiveness of diet and exercise alone. The importance of this paper lies in the persistent lack of recognition and/or awareness of proven, safe, and durable medical and surgical options in the lay population, highlighting the importance of aligning efforts and resources toward educating both the public and referring physicians.

Adams TD et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1143-55

This paper reports the results of an observational, prospective study that followed patients who received gastric bypass, in comparison with a group of patients who desired but did not receive gastric bypass, and a third group of obese patients who did not seek surgery. The authors concluded that gastric bypass provided durable, 12-year remission and prevention of such lethal diseases as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The importance of this study is in its detailed follow-up, the exceedingly high retention rate of 90% at 12 years, and the comparisons made between surgical and nonsurgical groups, demonstrating not only the benefits of gastric bypass, but as importantly, the hazards of not receiving this treatment.

Schauer PR et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):641-51.This paper is the latest installment of the long-term results from the STAMPEDE trial conducted at the Cleveland Clinic. STAMPEDE is a randomized, controlled trial that compared the best, most “intensive” medical therapy for type 2 diabetes vs. bariatric surgery (comprising a mix of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy). Prior publications from this group reported 1- and 3-year results, and this paper reported the 5-year results, demonstrating the persistent superiority of bariatric surgery over the most rigorous intensive medical therapy in the resolution or improvement of hyperglycemia in patients with BMI ranges of 27 kg/m² to 43 kg/m². Of further significance was the fact that there were no major late surgical complications except for one reoperation.

Samer Mattar, MD, FACS

Colon & Rectal Surgery

Jayne D et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: The ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569-80.

This trial of 471 rectal cancer patients demonstrated similar conversion rates for robotic (8.1%) and laparoscopic (12.2%) surgery. Of the other secondary end points, including intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, plane of surgery, 30-day mortality, bladder dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction, none showed a statistically significant difference between groups.

Marshall JR et al. Laparoscopic lavage in the management of Hinchey grade III diverticulitis: A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265(4):670-6.While there have been a number of groups using laparoscopic lavage in the setting of acute diverticulitis, including Hinchey grade III disease, several recent studies question this approach. This meta-analysis includes three recent randomized, controlled trials and analysis of 48 studies – demonstrating that rates of reintervention within 30 days to be 28.3% in the lavage group and 8.8% in the resection group. Other outcomes – including ICU admissions, 30- and 90-day mortality, or stoma rates at 12 months – were similar between groups.

Denost Q et al. To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: The GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2017;365(3):474-80.

While many studies have confirmed infectiveness of drainage after colectomy, there is still some controversy of the role of pelvic drainage after rectal surgery. A multicenter randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms (drain vs. no drain) was conducted in 469 patients after rectal surgery for cancer. Primary endpoint was postoperative pelvic sepsis within 30 postoperative days, including anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, and peritonitis. Rates of pelvic sepsis were similar between drain and no drain: 16.1% vs. 18.0% (P = .58), and there was no difference in surgical morbidity, rate of reoperation, length of hospital stay, and rate of stoma closure between groups. Overall, this trial suggests that the use of a pelvic drain after rectal excision for rectal cancer did not confer any benefit.

Genevieve Melton-Meaux, MD, FACS

Breast Surgery

Giuliano AE et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926.

Long-term outcomes from the practice-changing ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) trial confirming the safety of omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection in women with T1/T2 tumors treated by lumpectomy and whole-breast radiation when metastatic disease is identified in one or two sentinel nodes.

Masuda N et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2147-59.

Breast cancer patients that achieve a complete pathologic response after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a survival advantage, and patients found to have residual disease represent a higher-risk population subset. This prospective randomized clinical trial (known as the CREATE-X study) revealed that adjuvant capecitabine can significantly mitigate this risk, especially for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Curigliano G et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1700-12.

This summary of the 2017 St. Gallen Conference proceedings provides a comprehensive yet concise review of contemporary standards of care in managing early stage breast cancer. Issues reviewed include lumpectomy margins, extent of breast/axillary surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, options for breast radiation schedules following lumpectomy, and application of currently available gene expression profiles.



Troester MA et al. Racial differences in PAM50 subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Feb 1;110(2);doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx135; epub ahead of print (Aug 2017).

Breast cancer outcome disparities related to racial/ethnic identity are well documented, with African American patients experiencing higher mortality rates, compared with White Americans. This disparity is partly explained by differences in tumor biology, since triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is twice as common in African American patients. Troester et al. conducted RNA expression-based PAM-50 tumor subtyping to demonstrate significantly higher rates of biologically aggressive tumor subtypes among African Americans breast cancer patients, compared with white Americans.

Lisa Newman, MD, FACS

Foregut

Teitelbaum EN et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5699-2 ; epub ahead of print.

This provides the longest follow-up to date regarding clinical efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the United States. Although not a panacea, POEM appears to provide substantial durable clinical improvement in patients suffering from esophageal motility disorders.

Kevin Reavis, MD, FACS

This article retrospectively review a rare neuroendocrine (gastrinoma) tumor over a 25-year period at a single institution, noting all demographics and outcomes. Great update and refresher. The article then went farther, evaluating an even rarer occurrence of a primary lymph node gastrinoma within this patient population and followed those patients outcomes as well. Two “values” for the “price of one.”

Haisley KR et al. Twenty-year trends in the utilization of Heller myotomy for achalasia in the United States. Am J Surg. 2017 Aug;214(2):299-302.

Gary Timmerman, MD, FACS

Recommended Reading lists are something of a tradition for ACS Surgery News. This feature has appeared several times over the years and it has always proved among the most popular items in the publication. But the project hinges on input from our Editorial Advisory Board, the members of which are already regularly called upon to help vet the publication’s content and give their advice. They have gone the extra mile and have once again chosen their “Best of 2017” studies in their own specialty areas, along with commentary on why their choices should be of interest to all surgeons. We hope our readers will find the list and the comments of interest.

AlexRaths/Thinkstock

General surgery

Cogbill TH et al. Rural general surgery: A 38-year experience with a regional network established by an integrated health system in the Midwestern United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(1):115-24.

This article is of particular interest because it provides details of an innovative, regional system of surgical care at the critical access hospitals and referral centers that cooperate seamlessly to improve quality of care and quality of practice for rural surgeons. It could serve as a model for similar independent hospitals and practices in a region to improve the practice lives of the surgeons in rural communities and preserve access to local care for rural patients.

Dimou FM et al. Outcomes in older patients with grade III cholecystitis and cholecystostomy tube placement: A propensity score analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(4):502-14.This study is valuable because it sheds light on the current status of treatment of severe acute cholecystitis in the United States and reports outcomes of patients who get initial tube cholecystostomy. It demonstrates potential drawbacks of following the Tokyo Guidelines: fewer patients receiving definitive treatment (cholecystectomy) and higher mortality rates and readmissions.

Karen E. Deveney, MD, FACS

Palliative Care

Gani F et al. Palliative care utilization among patients admitted for gastrointestinal and thoracic cancers. J Palliat Med. 2017 Nov 3; doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0295; epub ahead of print.

Is this a matter of “too little too late”? This retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients identified in the National Inpatient Sample database admitted with a primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal and/or thoracic cancer determined that only 8.5% of patients admitted received palliative care services. Surgical patients were 79% less likely to have received a palliative care consultation, and then only after a prolonged length of stay or postoperative complication. Is referral to palliative care services hindered by its stigmatization with these outcomes?

Taylor LJ et al. A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: Best Case/Worst Case. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(6):531-8.

My chief used to say, “You might not be teachable, but you are trainable!” After surgeons received training in the Best Case/Worst Case framework described in this paper, they demonstrated that it was possible to successfully change the focus of decision-making conversations from an isolated surgical problem – with its menu of technical solutions – instead into a discussion about treatment alternatives and outcomes. This intervention is a useful tool for one of the most invasive procedures of all – an exploration of a patient’s preferences and values that is necessary for shared decision making within the acute setting.

Makhani SS et al. Cognitive impairment and overall survival in frail surgical patients. J Amer Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):590-600.

In my preoperative discussions with families of frail patients, it is often quite evident that the factor driving their decision is the cognitive state of the patient and the consequences of its further decline, even when they are willing to accept the risks of physical frailty. This study in a large multidisciplinary cohort of patients undergoing major operations determined that a combined frailty (Fried frailty score) and cognitive assessment score (Emory Clock Draw Test) has a more powerful potential to predict adult patients at higher risk of overall survival than does either measurement alone. Dual frailty and cognitive screening appears to be a promising adjunct to the shared decision-making process.
 

Geoffrey P. Dunn, MD, FACS

Wilson DG et al. Patterns of care in hospitalized vascular patients at end of life. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):183-90.

This thoughtful study and the excellent accompanying invited commentary by William Schecter, MD, FACS, address a major, difficult issue that faces all physicians as our patients become older and sicker and our ability to keep them alive expands: How do we speak honestly with patients about their prognosis and likely outcomes and honor their autonomy in decision making?
 

Karen E. Deveney, MD, FACS

Practice Management

Robinson JR et al. Complexity of medical decision making in care provided by surgeons through patient portals. Surg Res. 2017;214:93-101.

This article describes an analysis of the content of patient portal messages exchanged between surgical providers and patients. The study demonstrates that more than 90% of these exchanges involved the delivery of medical care, and more than two-thirds of the messages contained medical decision making, which might have generated charges if done in a face-to-face outpatient encounter. The articles argues that surgeons are providing substantial medical care to their patients through patient portal message exchanges and suggests that models for compensation of this type of online care should be developed.

Gretchen Purcell Jackson, MD, FACS

Vascular Surgery

Bennett KM et al. Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher incidence of major adverse clinical events than carotid endarterectomy in female patients. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):794-801.

This article uses the ACS NSQIP database to assess outcomes of women undergoing intervention for carotid stenosis in a real-world setting and finds that major adverse cardiac events in the first 30 days is higher for carotid artery stenting (12.2%), compared with carotid endarterectomy (5.2%). What we need to keep in mind is that the practice of any intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is being reevaluated in the new CREST study, which will compare current best medical management with carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy. The indications are likely to change for all, but because women had less relative risk reduction in the early studies, we can expect that the benefits for intervention for women will continue to be less than those for men, calling to question when we should truly intervene, and how best to do so.

Gargiulo M et al. Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair performed in abdominal aortic aneurysms with large infrarenal necks. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4);1065-72.

This study found that endovascular aneurysm repair, performed in patients with large necks (greater than 28 mm), was associated with further neck enlargement at 2 years, and a higher risk of proximal type I endoleak, with the need for reintervention. This is one of many recent studies, all with similar findings. The issue becomes how we can best address larger infrarenal necks, whether by use of fenestrated grafts, snorkels/chimneys with extension of the seal zone, aptus, or other technologies. The question of whether all grafts have equal impacts on these more dilated necks has still to be elucidated. Nonetheless, when we stretch the instructions for use, there is an increased likelihood for more interventions.

Zettervall SL et al. Renal complications after EVAR with suprarenal versus infrarenal fixation among all users and routine users. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1305.

This study found that endografts with suprarenal fixation were associated with a greater decline in renal function, compared with those with infrarenal fixation, as well as with a longer length of stay. The reasons for the renal function decline are not entirely clear, and there was a slight increase in contrast use for those with suprarenal fixation but were otherwise similar when comparing comorbidities. Clearly, assessment of any impact on long-term renal function is important, and may affect future choice of endografts.

Linda Harris, MD, FACS

Bariatric Surgery

Rosenthal RJ et al. Obesity in America. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Oct;13(10):1643-50.

Although much has been reported on the dramatic benefits of bariatric surgery, it remains a matter of deep disappointment that only 1%-2% of the eligible population is receiving this life-saving therapy. This is a paper that reports and analyzes the results of a national survey that was conducted on behalf of the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, in an attempt to identify barriers to access, public misconceptions on obesity and its consequences, and other pertinent factors. Survey results included the findings that, although 80% of Americans considered obesity as the most serious health risk problem, there was a clear overestimation of the effectiveness of diet and exercise alone. The importance of this paper lies in the persistent lack of recognition and/or awareness of proven, safe, and durable medical and surgical options in the lay population, highlighting the importance of aligning efforts and resources toward educating both the public and referring physicians.

Adams TD et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1143-55

This paper reports the results of an observational, prospective study that followed patients who received gastric bypass, in comparison with a group of patients who desired but did not receive gastric bypass, and a third group of obese patients who did not seek surgery. The authors concluded that gastric bypass provided durable, 12-year remission and prevention of such lethal diseases as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The importance of this study is in its detailed follow-up, the exceedingly high retention rate of 90% at 12 years, and the comparisons made between surgical and nonsurgical groups, demonstrating not only the benefits of gastric bypass, but as importantly, the hazards of not receiving this treatment.

Schauer PR et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):641-51.This paper is the latest installment of the long-term results from the STAMPEDE trial conducted at the Cleveland Clinic. STAMPEDE is a randomized, controlled trial that compared the best, most “intensive” medical therapy for type 2 diabetes vs. bariatric surgery (comprising a mix of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy). Prior publications from this group reported 1- and 3-year results, and this paper reported the 5-year results, demonstrating the persistent superiority of bariatric surgery over the most rigorous intensive medical therapy in the resolution or improvement of hyperglycemia in patients with BMI ranges of 27 kg/m² to 43 kg/m². Of further significance was the fact that there were no major late surgical complications except for one reoperation.

Samer Mattar, MD, FACS

Colon & Rectal Surgery

Jayne D et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: The ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569-80.

This trial of 471 rectal cancer patients demonstrated similar conversion rates for robotic (8.1%) and laparoscopic (12.2%) surgery. Of the other secondary end points, including intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, plane of surgery, 30-day mortality, bladder dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction, none showed a statistically significant difference between groups.

Marshall JR et al. Laparoscopic lavage in the management of Hinchey grade III diverticulitis: A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265(4):670-6.While there have been a number of groups using laparoscopic lavage in the setting of acute diverticulitis, including Hinchey grade III disease, several recent studies question this approach. This meta-analysis includes three recent randomized, controlled trials and analysis of 48 studies – demonstrating that rates of reintervention within 30 days to be 28.3% in the lavage group and 8.8% in the resection group. Other outcomes – including ICU admissions, 30- and 90-day mortality, or stoma rates at 12 months – were similar between groups.

Denost Q et al. To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: The GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2017;365(3):474-80.

While many studies have confirmed infectiveness of drainage after colectomy, there is still some controversy of the role of pelvic drainage after rectal surgery. A multicenter randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms (drain vs. no drain) was conducted in 469 patients after rectal surgery for cancer. Primary endpoint was postoperative pelvic sepsis within 30 postoperative days, including anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, and peritonitis. Rates of pelvic sepsis were similar between drain and no drain: 16.1% vs. 18.0% (P = .58), and there was no difference in surgical morbidity, rate of reoperation, length of hospital stay, and rate of stoma closure between groups. Overall, this trial suggests that the use of a pelvic drain after rectal excision for rectal cancer did not confer any benefit.

Genevieve Melton-Meaux, MD, FACS

Breast Surgery

Giuliano AE et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926.

Long-term outcomes from the practice-changing ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) trial confirming the safety of omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection in women with T1/T2 tumors treated by lumpectomy and whole-breast radiation when metastatic disease is identified in one or two sentinel nodes.

Masuda N et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2147-59.

Breast cancer patients that achieve a complete pathologic response after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a survival advantage, and patients found to have residual disease represent a higher-risk population subset. This prospective randomized clinical trial (known as the CREATE-X study) revealed that adjuvant capecitabine can significantly mitigate this risk, especially for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Curigliano G et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1700-12.

This summary of the 2017 St. Gallen Conference proceedings provides a comprehensive yet concise review of contemporary standards of care in managing early stage breast cancer. Issues reviewed include lumpectomy margins, extent of breast/axillary surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, options for breast radiation schedules following lumpectomy, and application of currently available gene expression profiles.



Troester MA et al. Racial differences in PAM50 subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Feb 1;110(2);doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx135; epub ahead of print (Aug 2017).

Breast cancer outcome disparities related to racial/ethnic identity are well documented, with African American patients experiencing higher mortality rates, compared with White Americans. This disparity is partly explained by differences in tumor biology, since triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is twice as common in African American patients. Troester et al. conducted RNA expression-based PAM-50 tumor subtyping to demonstrate significantly higher rates of biologically aggressive tumor subtypes among African Americans breast cancer patients, compared with white Americans.

Lisa Newman, MD, FACS

Foregut

Teitelbaum EN et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5699-2 ; epub ahead of print.

This provides the longest follow-up to date regarding clinical efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the United States. Although not a panacea, POEM appears to provide substantial durable clinical improvement in patients suffering from esophageal motility disorders.

Kevin Reavis, MD, FACS

This article retrospectively review a rare neuroendocrine (gastrinoma) tumor over a 25-year period at a single institution, noting all demographics and outcomes. Great update and refresher. The article then went farther, evaluating an even rarer occurrence of a primary lymph node gastrinoma within this patient population and followed those patients outcomes as well. Two “values” for the “price of one.”

Haisley KR et al. Twenty-year trends in the utilization of Heller myotomy for achalasia in the United States. Am J Surg. 2017 Aug;214(2):299-302.

Gary Timmerman, MD, FACS

Recommended Reading lists are something of a tradition for ACS Surgery News. This feature has appeared several times over the years and it has always proved among the most popular items in the publication. But the project hinges on input from our Editorial Advisory Board, the members of which are already regularly called upon to help vet the publication’s content and give their advice. They have gone the extra mile and have once again chosen their “Best of 2017” studies in their own specialty areas, along with commentary on why their choices should be of interest to all surgeons. We hope our readers will find the list and the comments of interest.

AlexRaths/Thinkstock

General surgery

Cogbill TH et al. Rural general surgery: A 38-year experience with a regional network established by an integrated health system in the Midwestern United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(1):115-24.

This article is of particular interest because it provides details of an innovative, regional system of surgical care at the critical access hospitals and referral centers that cooperate seamlessly to improve quality of care and quality of practice for rural surgeons. It could serve as a model for similar independent hospitals and practices in a region to improve the practice lives of the surgeons in rural communities and preserve access to local care for rural patients.

Dimou FM et al. Outcomes in older patients with grade III cholecystitis and cholecystostomy tube placement: A propensity score analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(4):502-14.This study is valuable because it sheds light on the current status of treatment of severe acute cholecystitis in the United States and reports outcomes of patients who get initial tube cholecystostomy. It demonstrates potential drawbacks of following the Tokyo Guidelines: fewer patients receiving definitive treatment (cholecystectomy) and higher mortality rates and readmissions.

Karen E. Deveney, MD, FACS

Palliative Care

Gani F et al. Palliative care utilization among patients admitted for gastrointestinal and thoracic cancers. J Palliat Med. 2017 Nov 3; doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0295; epub ahead of print.

Is this a matter of “too little too late”? This retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients identified in the National Inpatient Sample database admitted with a primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal and/or thoracic cancer determined that only 8.5% of patients admitted received palliative care services. Surgical patients were 79% less likely to have received a palliative care consultation, and then only after a prolonged length of stay or postoperative complication. Is referral to palliative care services hindered by its stigmatization with these outcomes?

Taylor LJ et al. A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: Best Case/Worst Case. JAMA Surgery. 2017;152(6):531-8.

My chief used to say, “You might not be teachable, but you are trainable!” After surgeons received training in the Best Case/Worst Case framework described in this paper, they demonstrated that it was possible to successfully change the focus of decision-making conversations from an isolated surgical problem – with its menu of technical solutions – instead into a discussion about treatment alternatives and outcomes. This intervention is a useful tool for one of the most invasive procedures of all – an exploration of a patient’s preferences and values that is necessary for shared decision making within the acute setting.

Makhani SS et al. Cognitive impairment and overall survival in frail surgical patients. J Amer Coll Surg. 2017 Nov;225(5):590-600.

In my preoperative discussions with families of frail patients, it is often quite evident that the factor driving their decision is the cognitive state of the patient and the consequences of its further decline, even when they are willing to accept the risks of physical frailty. This study in a large multidisciplinary cohort of patients undergoing major operations determined that a combined frailty (Fried frailty score) and cognitive assessment score (Emory Clock Draw Test) has a more powerful potential to predict adult patients at higher risk of overall survival than does either measurement alone. Dual frailty and cognitive screening appears to be a promising adjunct to the shared decision-making process.
 

Geoffrey P. Dunn, MD, FACS

Wilson DG et al. Patterns of care in hospitalized vascular patients at end of life. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):183-90.

This thoughtful study and the excellent accompanying invited commentary by William Schecter, MD, FACS, address a major, difficult issue that faces all physicians as our patients become older and sicker and our ability to keep them alive expands: How do we speak honestly with patients about their prognosis and likely outcomes and honor their autonomy in decision making?
 

Karen E. Deveney, MD, FACS

Practice Management

Robinson JR et al. Complexity of medical decision making in care provided by surgeons through patient portals. Surg Res. 2017;214:93-101.

This article describes an analysis of the content of patient portal messages exchanged between surgical providers and patients. The study demonstrates that more than 90% of these exchanges involved the delivery of medical care, and more than two-thirds of the messages contained medical decision making, which might have generated charges if done in a face-to-face outpatient encounter. The articles argues that surgeons are providing substantial medical care to their patients through patient portal message exchanges and suggests that models for compensation of this type of online care should be developed.

Gretchen Purcell Jackson, MD, FACS

Vascular Surgery

Bennett KM et al. Carotid artery stenting is associated with a higher incidence of major adverse clinical events than carotid endarterectomy in female patients. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):794-801.

This article uses the ACS NSQIP database to assess outcomes of women undergoing intervention for carotid stenosis in a real-world setting and finds that major adverse cardiac events in the first 30 days is higher for carotid artery stenting (12.2%), compared with carotid endarterectomy (5.2%). What we need to keep in mind is that the practice of any intervention for asymptomatic carotid stenosis is being reevaluated in the new CREST study, which will compare current best medical management with carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy. The indications are likely to change for all, but because women had less relative risk reduction in the early studies, we can expect that the benefits for intervention for women will continue to be less than those for men, calling to question when we should truly intervene, and how best to do so.

Gargiulo M et al. Outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair performed in abdominal aortic aneurysms with large infrarenal necks. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4);1065-72.

This study found that endovascular aneurysm repair, performed in patients with large necks (greater than 28 mm), was associated with further neck enlargement at 2 years, and a higher risk of proximal type I endoleak, with the need for reintervention. This is one of many recent studies, all with similar findings. The issue becomes how we can best address larger infrarenal necks, whether by use of fenestrated grafts, snorkels/chimneys with extension of the seal zone, aptus, or other technologies. The question of whether all grafts have equal impacts on these more dilated necks has still to be elucidated. Nonetheless, when we stretch the instructions for use, there is an increased likelihood for more interventions.

Zettervall SL et al. Renal complications after EVAR with suprarenal versus infrarenal fixation among all users and routine users. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1305.

This study found that endografts with suprarenal fixation were associated with a greater decline in renal function, compared with those with infrarenal fixation, as well as with a longer length of stay. The reasons for the renal function decline are not entirely clear, and there was a slight increase in contrast use for those with suprarenal fixation but were otherwise similar when comparing comorbidities. Clearly, assessment of any impact on long-term renal function is important, and may affect future choice of endografts.

Linda Harris, MD, FACS

Bariatric Surgery

Rosenthal RJ et al. Obesity in America. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Oct;13(10):1643-50.

Although much has been reported on the dramatic benefits of bariatric surgery, it remains a matter of deep disappointment that only 1%-2% of the eligible population is receiving this life-saving therapy. This is a paper that reports and analyzes the results of a national survey that was conducted on behalf of the American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, in an attempt to identify barriers to access, public misconceptions on obesity and its consequences, and other pertinent factors. Survey results included the findings that, although 80% of Americans considered obesity as the most serious health risk problem, there was a clear overestimation of the effectiveness of diet and exercise alone. The importance of this paper lies in the persistent lack of recognition and/or awareness of proven, safe, and durable medical and surgical options in the lay population, highlighting the importance of aligning efforts and resources toward educating both the public and referring physicians.

Adams TD et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes 12 years after gastric bypass. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1143-55

This paper reports the results of an observational, prospective study that followed patients who received gastric bypass, in comparison with a group of patients who desired but did not receive gastric bypass, and a third group of obese patients who did not seek surgery. The authors concluded that gastric bypass provided durable, 12-year remission and prevention of such lethal diseases as diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The importance of this study is in its detailed follow-up, the exceedingly high retention rate of 90% at 12 years, and the comparisons made between surgical and nonsurgical groups, demonstrating not only the benefits of gastric bypass, but as importantly, the hazards of not receiving this treatment.

Schauer PR et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):641-51.This paper is the latest installment of the long-term results from the STAMPEDE trial conducted at the Cleveland Clinic. STAMPEDE is a randomized, controlled trial that compared the best, most “intensive” medical therapy for type 2 diabetes vs. bariatric surgery (comprising a mix of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy). Prior publications from this group reported 1- and 3-year results, and this paper reported the 5-year results, demonstrating the persistent superiority of bariatric surgery over the most rigorous intensive medical therapy in the resolution or improvement of hyperglycemia in patients with BMI ranges of 27 kg/m² to 43 kg/m². Of further significance was the fact that there were no major late surgical complications except for one reoperation.

Samer Mattar, MD, FACS

Colon & Rectal Surgery

Jayne D et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: The ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569-80.

This trial of 471 rectal cancer patients demonstrated similar conversion rates for robotic (8.1%) and laparoscopic (12.2%) surgery. Of the other secondary end points, including intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, plane of surgery, 30-day mortality, bladder dysfunction, and sexual dysfunction, none showed a statistically significant difference between groups.

Marshall JR et al. Laparoscopic lavage in the management of Hinchey grade III diverticulitis: A systematic review. Ann Surg. 2017;265(4):670-6.While there have been a number of groups using laparoscopic lavage in the setting of acute diverticulitis, including Hinchey grade III disease, several recent studies question this approach. This meta-analysis includes three recent randomized, controlled trials and analysis of 48 studies – demonstrating that rates of reintervention within 30 days to be 28.3% in the lavage group and 8.8% in the resection group. Other outcomes – including ICU admissions, 30- and 90-day mortality, or stoma rates at 12 months – were similar between groups.

Denost Q et al. To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: The GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2017;365(3):474-80.

While many studies have confirmed infectiveness of drainage after colectomy, there is still some controversy of the role of pelvic drainage after rectal surgery. A multicenter randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms (drain vs. no drain) was conducted in 469 patients after rectal surgery for cancer. Primary endpoint was postoperative pelvic sepsis within 30 postoperative days, including anastomotic leakage, pelvic abscess, and peritonitis. Rates of pelvic sepsis were similar between drain and no drain: 16.1% vs. 18.0% (P = .58), and there was no difference in surgical morbidity, rate of reoperation, length of hospital stay, and rate of stoma closure between groups. Overall, this trial suggests that the use of a pelvic drain after rectal excision for rectal cancer did not confer any benefit.

Genevieve Melton-Meaux, MD, FACS

Breast Surgery

Giuliano AE et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926.

Long-term outcomes from the practice-changing ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) trial confirming the safety of omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection in women with T1/T2 tumors treated by lumpectomy and whole-breast radiation when metastatic disease is identified in one or two sentinel nodes.

Masuda N et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 1;376(22):2147-59.

Breast cancer patients that achieve a complete pathologic response after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a survival advantage, and patients found to have residual disease represent a higher-risk population subset. This prospective randomized clinical trial (known as the CREATE-X study) revealed that adjuvant capecitabine can significantly mitigate this risk, especially for patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Curigliano G et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;28(8):1700-12.

This summary of the 2017 St. Gallen Conference proceedings provides a comprehensive yet concise review of contemporary standards of care in managing early stage breast cancer. Issues reviewed include lumpectomy margins, extent of breast/axillary surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, options for breast radiation schedules following lumpectomy, and application of currently available gene expression profiles.



Troester MA et al. Racial differences in PAM50 subtypes in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Feb 1;110(2);doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx135; epub ahead of print (Aug 2017).

Breast cancer outcome disparities related to racial/ethnic identity are well documented, with African American patients experiencing higher mortality rates, compared with White Americans. This disparity is partly explained by differences in tumor biology, since triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is twice as common in African American patients. Troester et al. conducted RNA expression-based PAM-50 tumor subtyping to demonstrate significantly higher rates of biologically aggressive tumor subtypes among African Americans breast cancer patients, compared with white Americans.

Lisa Newman, MD, FACS

Foregut

Teitelbaum EN et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun 29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5699-2 ; epub ahead of print.

This provides the longest follow-up to date regarding clinical efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the United States. Although not a panacea, POEM appears to provide substantial durable clinical improvement in patients suffering from esophageal motility disorders.

Kevin Reavis, MD, FACS

This article retrospectively review a rare neuroendocrine (gastrinoma) tumor over a 25-year period at a single institution, noting all demographics and outcomes. Great update and refresher. The article then went farther, evaluating an even rarer occurrence of a primary lymph node gastrinoma within this patient population and followed those patients outcomes as well. Two “values” for the “price of one.”

Haisley KR et al. Twenty-year trends in the utilization of Heller myotomy for achalasia in the United States. Am J Surg. 2017 Aug;214(2):299-302.

Gary Timmerman, MD, FACS

While cases of active tuberculosis are relatively rare in the United States, TB is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the United States, there are an estimated 11 million individuals who have latent TB infection (LTBI). Without prophylactic treatment, somewhere between 4%-6% of individuals with LTBI will develop active disease during their lifetimes; roughly half of these cases will occur within a few years of the initial infection. Treatment of LTBI reduces – but does not eliminate – the risk for active disease, decreasing the consequences of active disease for the patient and the risk of transmitting infection to others.

Diagnostic tests for LTBI

The tuberculin skin test (TST) has been the standard method of diagnosing LTBI. It involves measuring induration caused by a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) 2 or 3 days after injecting the reagent into the skin. The TST can result in false positives when detecting antibodies to BCG and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and false negatives when the patient does not demonstrate a robust immune response. A newer testing method is the Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA), which involves phlebotomy, followed by a series of laboratory procedures that measure IFN-gamma release by T cells that have been sensitized to Mtb. The sensitivity of IGRA is similar to the TST, but it has better specificity; it is much less likely to react to antigens from BCG or nontuberculous mycobacteria. As detailed below, this guideline suggests a significantly more prominent role for IGRA, compared with previous recommendations.

Recommendation 1. Perform an IGRA, rather than a TST, in individuals 5 years or older who meet the following criteria: 1) are likely to be infected with Mtb; 2) have a low or intermediate risk of disease progression; 3) in whom it has been decided that testing for LTBI is warranted. A TST is an acceptable alternative, particularly if an IGRA is not available, is too costly, or is too burdensome. If an individual either has a history of BCG vaccination or is unlikely to return to have their TST read, then it is strongly recommended to use the IGRA as the test of choice.

Recommendation 2. There are insufficient data to recommend a preference for either a TST or an IGRA as the first-line diagnostic test in individuals 5 years or older who are likely to be infected with Mtb, who have a high risk of progression to active disease, and in whom it has been determined that diagnostic testing for LTBI infection is warranted; either test would be acceptable. In very high-risk patients, consider dual testing, with a positive result from either test (TST or IGRA) being considered positive.

Recommendation 3. Guidelines do not recommend testing for persons at low risk for Mtb infection. However, the authors recognize that testing in such persons may nevertheless be mandated in certain situations (for example in some school or child care settings). In these cases, the authors recommend performing an IGRA instead of a TST, to minimize the chance of a false-positive result, although a TST is an acceptable alternative. Furthermore, if the initial test is positive, they suggest performing a confirmatory test (either an IGRA or TST) and considering the person infected only if both tests are positive.

Recommendation 4. The authors suggest performing a TST rather than an IGRA in healthy children less than 5 years of age for whom it has been decided that diagnostic testing for LTBI is warranted. This recommendation reflects the limited body of evidence regarding IGRA testing in young children and the apparent decreased sensitivity (i.e. more false negatives) in this population, compared with TST use.

In the area of serial testing for TB infection, often done in health care and institutional settings, the guideline points out areas of uncertainty with IGRA testing. Specifically, the IGRA test is subject to variability in readings and boosting with antigen exposure that can complicate interpretation of apparent conversion on repeat testing. One longitudinal study showed conversion rates with IGRA to be six to nine times higher than that seen for the TST, and those conversions were thought to represent false positive tests. The guideline concludes that, “There is insufficient information available to guide the establishment of definitive criteria for the conversion.” The committee thought that a positive test in a low-risk individual was likely to be a false-positive result and recommended repeat testing. Because of the possibility of boosting with antigen exposure in situations where dual testing is anticipated, it may be preferable to obtain a specimen for IGRA prior to, or concurrently with TST placement.
 

Bottom line

Current guidelines suggest a more prominent role for IGRA in testing for LTBI, particularly when the likelihood of exposure is low and in situations where a person may have received BCG vaccination, or would be unlikely to return for TST reading.

Dr. Skolnik is professor of family and community medicine at Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and associate director of the family medicine residency program at Abington (Pa.) Jefferson Health. Dr. Clark is associate director of the family medicine residency program at Abington (Pa.) Jefferson Health.

Reference

Lewisohn DM et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. Clin Inf Dis. 2017;64(2):111-5.

While cases of active tuberculosis are relatively rare in the United States, TB is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the United States, there are an estimated 11 million individuals who have latent TB infection (LTBI). Without prophylactic treatment, somewhere between 4%-6% of individuals with LTBI will develop active disease during their lifetimes; roughly half of these cases will occur within a few years of the initial infection. Treatment of LTBI reduces – but does not eliminate – the risk for active disease, decreasing the consequences of active disease for the patient and the risk of transmitting infection to others.

Diagnostic tests for LTBI

The tuberculin skin test (TST) has been the standard method of diagnosing LTBI. It involves measuring induration caused by a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) 2 or 3 days after injecting the reagent into the skin. The TST can result in false positives when detecting antibodies to BCG and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and false negatives when the patient does not demonstrate a robust immune response. A newer testing method is the Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA), which involves phlebotomy, followed by a series of laboratory procedures that measure IFN-gamma release by T cells that have been sensitized to Mtb. The sensitivity of IGRA is similar to the TST, but it has better specificity; it is much less likely to react to antigens from BCG or nontuberculous mycobacteria. As detailed below, this guideline suggests a significantly more prominent role for IGRA, compared with previous recommendations.

Recommendation 1. Perform an IGRA, rather than a TST, in individuals 5 years or older who meet the following criteria: 1) are likely to be infected with Mtb; 2) have a low or intermediate risk of disease progression; 3) in whom it has been decided that testing for LTBI is warranted. A TST is an acceptable alternative, particularly if an IGRA is not available, is too costly, or is too burdensome. If an individual either has a history of BCG vaccination or is unlikely to return to have their TST read, then it is strongly recommended to use the IGRA as the test of choice.

Recommendation 2. There are insufficient data to recommend a preference for either a TST or an IGRA as the first-line diagnostic test in individuals 5 years or older who are likely to be infected with Mtb, who have a high risk of progression to active disease, and in whom it has been determined that diagnostic testing for LTBI infection is warranted; either test would be acceptable. In very high-risk patients, consider dual testing, with a positive result from either test (TST or IGRA) being considered positive.

Recommendation 3. Guidelines do not recommend testing for persons at low risk for Mtb infection. However, the authors recognize that testing in such persons may nevertheless be mandated in certain situations (for example in some school or child care settings). In these cases, the authors recommend performing an IGRA instead of a TST, to minimize the chance of a false-positive result, although a TST is an acceptable alternative. Furthermore, if the initial test is positive, they suggest performing a confirmatory test (either an IGRA or TST) and considering the person infected only if both tests are positive.

Recommendation 4. The authors suggest performing a TST rather than an IGRA in healthy children less than 5 years of age for whom it has been decided that diagnostic testing for LTBI is warranted. This recommendation reflects the limited body of evidence regarding IGRA testing in young children and the apparent decreased sensitivity (i.e. more false negatives) in this population, compared with TST use.

In the area of serial testing for TB infection, often done in health care and institutional settings, the guideline points out areas of uncertainty with IGRA testing. Specifically, the IGRA test is subject to variability in readings and boosting with antigen exposure that can complicate interpretation of apparent conversion on repeat testing. One longitudinal study showed conversion rates with IGRA to be six to nine times higher than that seen for the TST, and those conversions were thought to represent false positive tests. The guideline concludes that, “There is insufficient information available to guide the establishment of definitive criteria for the conversion.” The committee thought that a positive test in a low-risk individual was likely to be a false-positive result and recommended repeat testing. Because of the possibility of boosting with antigen exposure in situations where dual testing is anticipated, it may be preferable to obtain a specimen for IGRA prior to, or concurrently with TST placement.
 

Bottom line

Current guidelines suggest a more prominent role for IGRA in testing for LTBI, particularly when the likelihood of exposure is low and in situations where a person may have received BCG vaccination, or would be unlikely to return for TST reading.

Dr. Skolnik is professor of family and community medicine at Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and associate director of the family medicine residency program at Abington (Pa.) Jefferson Health. Dr. Clark is associate director of the family medicine residency program at Abington (Pa.) Jefferson Health.

Reference

Lewisohn DM et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. Clin Inf Dis. 2017;64(2):111-5.

While cases of active tuberculosis are relatively rare in the United States, TB is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In the United States, there are an estimated 11 million individuals who have latent TB infection (LTBI). Without prophylactic treatment, somewhere between 4%-6% of individuals with LTBI will develop active disease during their lifetimes; roughly half of these cases will occur within a few years of the initial infection. Treatment of LTBI reduces – but does not eliminate – the risk for active disease, decreasing the consequences of active disease for the patient and the risk of transmitting infection to others.

Diagnostic tests for LTBI

The tuberculin skin test (TST) has been the standard method of diagnosing LTBI. It involves measuring induration caused by a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) 2 or 3 days after injecting the reagent into the skin. The TST can result in false positives when detecting antibodies to BCG and nontuberculous mycobacteria, and false negatives when the patient does not demonstrate a robust immune response. A newer testing method is the Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA), which involves phlebotomy, followed by a series of laboratory procedures that measure IFN-gamma release by T cells that have been sensitized to Mtb. The sensitivity of IGRA is similar to the TST, but it has better specificity; it is much less likely to react to antigens from BCG or nontuberculous mycobacteria. As detailed below, this guideline suggests a significantly more prominent role for IGRA, compared with previous recommendations.

Recommendation 1. Perform an IGRA, rather than a TST, in individuals 5 years or older who meet the following criteria: 1) are likely to be infected with Mtb; 2) have a low or intermediate risk of disease progression; 3) in whom it has been decided that testing for LTBI is warranted. A TST is an acceptable alternative, particularly if an IGRA is not available, is too costly, or is too burdensome. If an individual either has a history of BCG vaccination or is unlikely to return to have their TST read, then it is strongly recommended to use the IGRA as the test of choice.

Recommendation 2. There are insufficient data to recommend a preference for either a TST or an IGRA as the first-line diagnostic test in individuals 5 years or older who are likely to be infected with Mtb, who have a high risk of progression to active disease, and in whom it has been determined that diagnostic testing for LTBI infection is warranted; either test would be acceptable. In very high-risk patients, consider dual testing, with a positive result from either test (TST or IGRA) being considered positive.

Recommendation 3. Guidelines do not recommend testing for persons at low risk for Mtb infection. However, the authors recognize that testing in such persons may nevertheless be mandated in certain situations (for example in some school or child care settings). In these cases, the authors recommend performing an IGRA instead of a TST, to minimize the chance of a false-positive result, although a TST is an acceptable alternative. Furthermore, if the initial test is positive, they suggest performing a confirmatory test (either an IGRA or TST) and considering the person infected only if both tests are positive.

Recommendation 4. The authors suggest performing a TST rather than an IGRA in healthy children less than 5 years of age for whom it has been decided that diagnostic testing for LTBI is warranted. This recommendation reflects the limited body of evidence regarding IGRA testing in young children and the apparent decreased sensitivity (i.e. more false negatives) in this population, compared with TST use.

In the area of serial testing for TB infection, often done in health care and institutional settings, the guideline points out areas of uncertainty with IGRA testing. Specifically, the IGRA test is subject to variability in readings and boosting with antigen exposure that can complicate interpretation of apparent conversion on repeat testing. One longitudinal study showed conversion rates with IGRA to be six to nine times higher than that seen for the TST, and those conversions were thought to represent false positive tests. The guideline concludes that, “There is insufficient information available to guide the establishment of definitive criteria for the conversion.” The committee thought that a positive test in a low-risk individual was likely to be a false-positive result and recommended repeat testing. Because of the possibility of boosting with antigen exposure in situations where dual testing is anticipated, it may be preferable to obtain a specimen for IGRA prior to, or concurrently with TST placement.
 

Bottom line

Current guidelines suggest a more prominent role for IGRA in testing for LTBI, particularly when the likelihood of exposure is low and in situations where a person may have received BCG vaccination, or would be unlikely to return for TST reading.

Dr. Skolnik is professor of family and community medicine at Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, and associate director of the family medicine residency program at Abington (Pa.) Jefferson Health. Dr. Clark is associate director of the family medicine residency program at Abington (Pa.) Jefferson Health.

Reference

Lewisohn DM et al. Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children. Clin Inf Dis. 2017;64(2):111-5.

MenB-FHbp, a licensed meningococcal B vaccine that targets factor H-binding protein, a surface-exposed bacterial lipoprotein, has been shown to provide broad immunological protection against 4 primary and 10 additional strains of meningococcal B disease in teens and young adults, suggesting the potential to reduce the number of shots needed to protect this population, according to two phase 3 randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, multicenter trials.

Courtesy CDC

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ostergaard L et al. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2350-62.

Correction 12/14/17: An earlier version of this story misstated the findings concerning this subfamily.

MenB-FHbp, a licensed meningococcal B vaccine that targets factor H-binding protein, a surface-exposed bacterial lipoprotein, has been shown to provide broad immunological protection against 4 primary and 10 additional strains of meningococcal B disease in teens and young adults, suggesting the potential to reduce the number of shots needed to protect this population, according to two phase 3 randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, multicenter trials.

Courtesy CDC

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ostergaard L et al. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2350-62.

Correction 12/14/17: An earlier version of this story misstated the findings concerning this subfamily.

MenB-FHbp, a licensed meningococcal B vaccine that targets factor H-binding protein, a surface-exposed bacterial lipoprotein, has been shown to provide broad immunological protection against 4 primary and 10 additional strains of meningococcal B disease in teens and young adults, suggesting the potential to reduce the number of shots needed to protect this population, according to two phase 3 randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, multicenter trials.

Courtesy CDC

[email protected]

SOURCE: Ostergaard L et al. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2350-62.

Correction 12/14/17: An earlier version of this story misstated the findings concerning this subfamily.

A one-time dose of radiation to arrhythmogenic scars eliminated or at least greatly reduced ventricular tachycardia in five patients who had failed to respond to medical management and, in some cases, catheter ablation, according to a report in the New England Journal of Medicine.
 

Sohel_Parvez_Haque/Thinkstock

[email protected]

SOURCE: Cuculich P et al. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613773.

A one-time dose of radiation to arrhythmogenic scars eliminated or at least greatly reduced ventricular tachycardia in five patients who had failed to respond to medical management and, in some cases, catheter ablation, according to a report in the New England Journal of Medicine.
 

Sohel_Parvez_Haque/Thinkstock

[email protected]

SOURCE: Cuculich P et al. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613773.

A one-time dose of radiation to arrhythmogenic scars eliminated or at least greatly reduced ventricular tachycardia in five patients who had failed to respond to medical management and, in some cases, catheter ablation, according to a report in the New England Journal of Medicine.
 

Sohel_Parvez_Haque/Thinkstock

[email protected]

SOURCE: Cuculich P et al. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613773.

Practice makes perfect. It also makes the perfect setting for real-world research in rheumatology. Traditionally, however, rheumatologists in day-to-day private practice settings have been hampered by limited opportunities, time constraints, and competition from larger academic medical centers to conduct cutting edge research.

That could soon change. The Norman B. Gaylis, MD, Research Award for Rheumatologists in Community Practice is being relaunched to offer rheumatologists research grants from $50,000-$200,000 per year, for up to 2 years, to drive the field forward. The program stems from a generous $1 million commitment from Dr. Gaylis, a rheumatologist in private practice in Aventura, Fla., in partnership with the Rheumatology Research Foundation.

Courtesy Dr. Norman Gaylis

Investigator-driven initiatives

In addition to financial support, the program will help community rheumatologists with viable ideas, including clinicians with less research experience, to refine their hypothesis and methodology as appropriate. “For example, if someone submits a proposal to study the effect of diet on gout, we, as part of the application process, will help them develop the application so it meets the quality expectations of the review committee,” Dr. Gaylis said. “We want it to be their idea, uniquely, the idea of the application. We can guide them so it will be a quality application,” Dr. Gaylis said. “Then it’s up to them.”

Support from the Foundation will remain available and periodic reports will be required to ensure the research is progressing on schedule. “We don’t expect them to get this turned around in 6 months,” Dr. Gaylis said. “It could be a 2-year study ... or even longer.”

“Understanding their priorities and research interests are very different from their colleagues in academia, the Foundation wants to encourage rheumatologists in a clinical setting to explore their own, independent research ideas,” said Shelley A. Malcolm, director of marketing and communication at the Rheumatology Research Foundation.

“The application process and award terms are tailored for rheumatology health professionals who may not have experience in writing grant proposals, or have time to draft applications similar to those required for NIH funding, because their priority lies in patient care and practice management,” Ms. Malcolm said. The Foundation will begin accepting proposals in March 2018 and up until the July 1, 2018 deadline.
 

Smart but not academic

Dr. Gaylis and the Rheumatology Research Foundation worked together to streamline the process with busy clinicians in mind.

This award is really for the rheumatologist in practice … who is not affiliated with academic institutions. They can be attached as a clinical professor, but they’re not really supported by an institution,” Dr. Gaylis said. “Effectively, this should really allow them to have the flexibility to do the research they feel needs to be done without having to go through the whole administrative process you would normally find in an academic institution.”

Recipients will not be competing with academic medical centers that have “the reputation, the manpower, and the capabilities that in general can swallow up all the research awards available.” This recognizes what the practicing clinician brings to the table without making them feel like they’re wasting their time by applying, Dr. Gaylis added.

“This is not saying that academia doesn’t have its role.” But the award program “levels the playing field.”
 

Keeping it real

Clinical practice “is really a real-world environment. Whether one is trying to understand the possibilities in using treatments differently, approaching patients differently, or seeing outcomes you’re seeing that are different from the standard, controlled, double-blind placebo study that is the norm in academic research,” Dr. Gaylis said.

“This is much more focused on the patient who walks into your office,” he continued. “I believe there are many, many more rheumatologists like me who could embrace this opportunity.” He added, “If I was allowed to, I would apply for it myself.”

The research award program can serve as a platform not only for making new discoveries but also taking drugs that are on the marketplace and using them in different forms or fashions in a successful way, Dr. Gaylis said. “And it doesn’t just have to be medications; it could be behavior mechanisms – understanding which patients might be more responsive to therapies, for example.”

The purpose is to initiate research, including but not limited to, health services research or outcome studies, practice supply and demand, and/or patient communications, Ms. Malcolm said. “The goal of the award is to provide independent investigators with the funding they need to pursue ideas that could lead to important breakthroughs in discovering new treatments and, one day, a cure.”

“Clinical practice is an incredible petri dish for research,” Dr. Gaylis said. “We end up losing a lot of opportunities by pigeonholing most research in academic centers. So if we can show the value and validity and identify clinicians who have the aptitude for this kind of clinical research, I think not only will this award program become more exciting, it will become more valuable.”
 

Maintain career-long clinical curiosity

Clinical practice is a very important point in the journey of being a rheumatologist, Dr. Gaylis said, but research shouldn’t end when you complete your fellowship. “It should continue for your whole career. One should be putting into effect the principles of investigation, the principles of observation, and the principle of generating ideas that are instilled in everyone during their education, but they get diluted as time goes on. We’re trying to prevent that.”

Rheumatologists, or rheumatology health professionals, with an idea or discovery they want to explore are encouraged to reach out to the Foundation staff with any questions or concerns at (404) 365-1373 or [email protected]. Foundation staff will provide assistance, including connecting applicants with a mentor to help simplify the process.

Practice makes perfect. It also makes the perfect setting for real-world research in rheumatology. Traditionally, however, rheumatologists in day-to-day private practice settings have been hampered by limited opportunities, time constraints, and competition from larger academic medical centers to conduct cutting edge research.

That could soon change. The Norman B. Gaylis, MD, Research Award for Rheumatologists in Community Practice is being relaunched to offer rheumatologists research grants from $50,000-$200,000 per year, for up to 2 years, to drive the field forward. The program stems from a generous $1 million commitment from Dr. Gaylis, a rheumatologist in private practice in Aventura, Fla., in partnership with the Rheumatology Research Foundation.

Courtesy Dr. Norman Gaylis

Investigator-driven initiatives

In addition to financial support, the program will help community rheumatologists with viable ideas, including clinicians with less research experience, to refine their hypothesis and methodology as appropriate. “For example, if someone submits a proposal to study the effect of diet on gout, we, as part of the application process, will help them develop the application so it meets the quality expectations of the review committee,” Dr. Gaylis said. “We want it to be their idea, uniquely, the idea of the application. We can guide them so it will be a quality application,” Dr. Gaylis said. “Then it’s up to them.”

Support from the Foundation will remain available and periodic reports will be required to ensure the research is progressing on schedule. “We don’t expect them to get this turned around in 6 months,” Dr. Gaylis said. “It could be a 2-year study ... or even longer.”

“Understanding their priorities and research interests are very different from their colleagues in academia, the Foundation wants to encourage rheumatologists in a clinical setting to explore their own, independent research ideas,” said Shelley A. Malcolm, director of marketing and communication at the Rheumatology Research Foundation.

“The application process and award terms are tailored for rheumatology health professionals who may not have experience in writing grant proposals, or have time to draft applications similar to those required for NIH funding, because their priority lies in patient care and practice management,” Ms. Malcolm said. The Foundation will begin accepting proposals in March 2018 and up until the July 1, 2018 deadline.
 

Smart but not academic

Dr. Gaylis and the Rheumatology Research Foundation worked together to streamline the process with busy clinicians in mind.

This award is really for the rheumatologist in practice … who is not affiliated with academic institutions. They can be attached as a clinical professor, but they’re not really supported by an institution,” Dr. Gaylis said. “Effectively, this should really allow them to have the flexibility to do the research they feel needs to be done without having to go through the whole administrative process you would normally find in an academic institution.”

Recipients will not be competing with academic medical centers that have “the reputation, the manpower, and the capabilities that in general can swallow up all the research awards available.” This recognizes what the practicing clinician brings to the table without making them feel like they’re wasting their time by applying, Dr. Gaylis added.

“This is not saying that academia doesn’t have its role.” But the award program “levels the playing field.”
 

Keeping it real

Clinical practice “is really a real-world environment. Whether one is trying to understand the possibilities in using treatments differently, approaching patients differently, or seeing outcomes you’re seeing that are different from the standard, controlled, double-blind placebo study that is the norm in academic research,” Dr. Gaylis said.

“This is much more focused on the patient who walks into your office,” he continued. “I believe there are many, many more rheumatologists like me who could embrace this opportunity.” He added, “If I was allowed to, I would apply for it myself.”

The research award program can serve as a platform not only for making new discoveries but also taking drugs that are on the marketplace and using them in different forms or fashions in a successful way, Dr. Gaylis said. “And it doesn’t just have to be medications; it could be behavior mechanisms – understanding which patients might be more responsive to therapies, for example.”

The purpose is to initiate research, including but not limited to, health services research or outcome studies, practice supply and demand, and/or patient communications, Ms. Malcolm said. “The goal of the award is to provide independent investigators with the funding they need to pursue ideas that could lead to important breakthroughs in discovering new treatments and, one day, a cure.”

“Clinical practice is an incredible petri dish for research,” Dr. Gaylis said. “We end up losing a lot of opportunities by pigeonholing most research in academic centers. So if we can show the value and validity and identify clinicians who have the aptitude for this kind of clinical research, I think not only will this award program become more exciting, it will become more valuable.”
 

Maintain career-long clinical curiosity

Clinical practice is a very important point in the journey of being a rheumatologist, Dr. Gaylis said, but research shouldn’t end when you complete your fellowship. “It should continue for your whole career. One should be putting into effect the principles of investigation, the principles of observation, and the principle of generating ideas that are instilled in everyone during their education, but they get diluted as time goes on. We’re trying to prevent that.”

Rheumatologists, or rheumatology health professionals, with an idea or discovery they want to explore are encouraged to reach out to the Foundation staff with any questions or concerns at (404) 365-1373 or [email protected]. Foundation staff will provide assistance, including connecting applicants with a mentor to help simplify the process.

Practice makes perfect. It also makes the perfect setting for real-world research in rheumatology. Traditionally, however, rheumatologists in day-to-day private practice settings have been hampered by limited opportunities, time constraints, and competition from larger academic medical centers to conduct cutting edge research.

That could soon change. The Norman B. Gaylis, MD, Research Award for Rheumatologists in Community Practice is being relaunched to offer rheumatologists research grants from $50,000-$200,000 per year, for up to 2 years, to drive the field forward. The program stems from a generous $1 million commitment from Dr. Gaylis, a rheumatologist in private practice in Aventura, Fla., in partnership with the Rheumatology Research Foundation.

Courtesy Dr. Norman Gaylis

Investigator-driven initiatives

In addition to financial support, the program will help community rheumatologists with viable ideas, including clinicians with less research experience, to refine their hypothesis and methodology as appropriate. “For example, if someone submits a proposal to study the effect of diet on gout, we, as part of the application process, will help them develop the application so it meets the quality expectations of the review committee,” Dr. Gaylis said. “We want it to be their idea, uniquely, the idea of the application. We can guide them so it will be a quality application,” Dr. Gaylis said. “Then it’s up to them.”

Support from the Foundation will remain available and periodic reports will be required to ensure the research is progressing on schedule. “We don’t expect them to get this turned around in 6 months,” Dr. Gaylis said. “It could be a 2-year study ... or even longer.”

“Understanding their priorities and research interests are very different from their colleagues in academia, the Foundation wants to encourage rheumatologists in a clinical setting to explore their own, independent research ideas,” said Shelley A. Malcolm, director of marketing and communication at the Rheumatology Research Foundation.

“The application process and award terms are tailored for rheumatology health professionals who may not have experience in writing grant proposals, or have time to draft applications similar to those required for NIH funding, because their priority lies in patient care and practice management,” Ms. Malcolm said. The Foundation will begin accepting proposals in March 2018 and up until the July 1, 2018 deadline.
 

Smart but not academic

Dr. Gaylis and the Rheumatology Research Foundation worked together to streamline the process with busy clinicians in mind.

This award is really for the rheumatologist in practice … who is not affiliated with academic institutions. They can be attached as a clinical professor, but they’re not really supported by an institution,” Dr. Gaylis said. “Effectively, this should really allow them to have the flexibility to do the research they feel needs to be done without having to go through the whole administrative process you would normally find in an academic institution.”

Recipients will not be competing with academic medical centers that have “the reputation, the manpower, and the capabilities that in general can swallow up all the research awards available.” This recognizes what the practicing clinician brings to the table without making them feel like they’re wasting their time by applying, Dr. Gaylis added.

“This is not saying that academia doesn’t have its role.” But the award program “levels the playing field.”
 

Keeping it real

Clinical practice “is really a real-world environment. Whether one is trying to understand the possibilities in using treatments differently, approaching patients differently, or seeing outcomes you’re seeing that are different from the standard, controlled, double-blind placebo study that is the norm in academic research,” Dr. Gaylis said.

“This is much more focused on the patient who walks into your office,” he continued. “I believe there are many, many more rheumatologists like me who could embrace this opportunity.” He added, “If I was allowed to, I would apply for it myself.”

The research award program can serve as a platform not only for making new discoveries but also taking drugs that are on the marketplace and using them in different forms or fashions in a successful way, Dr. Gaylis said. “And it doesn’t just have to be medications; it could be behavior mechanisms – understanding which patients might be more responsive to therapies, for example.”

The purpose is to initiate research, including but not limited to, health services research or outcome studies, practice supply and demand, and/or patient communications, Ms. Malcolm said. “The goal of the award is to provide independent investigators with the funding they need to pursue ideas that could lead to important breakthroughs in discovering new treatments and, one day, a cure.”

“Clinical practice is an incredible petri dish for research,” Dr. Gaylis said. “We end up losing a lot of opportunities by pigeonholing most research in academic centers. So if we can show the value and validity and identify clinicians who have the aptitude for this kind of clinical research, I think not only will this award program become more exciting, it will become more valuable.”
 

Maintain career-long clinical curiosity

Clinical practice is a very important point in the journey of being a rheumatologist, Dr. Gaylis said, but research shouldn’t end when you complete your fellowship. “It should continue for your whole career. One should be putting into effect the principles of investigation, the principles of observation, and the principle of generating ideas that are instilled in everyone during their education, but they get diluted as time goes on. We’re trying to prevent that.”

Rheumatologists, or rheumatology health professionals, with an idea or discovery they want to explore are encouraged to reach out to the Foundation staff with any questions or concerns at (404) 365-1373 or [email protected]. Foundation staff will provide assistance, including connecting applicants with a mentor to help simplify the process.

The rise of noninvasive procedures has shifted the aesthetic culture. Patients now are asking for less invasive, less painful, less expensive procedures with short recovery times. Thread-lifts are one of the newest approaches to nonsurgical facial tightening. However, are they of value? Where, and for whom?

Dr. Talakoub and Dr. Wesley are cocontributors to this column. Dr. Talakoub is in private practice in McLean, Va. Dr. Wesley practices dermatology in Beverly Hills, Calif. This month’s column is by Dr. Talakoub. Write to them at [email protected]. They had no relevant disclosures.

The rise of noninvasive procedures has shifted the aesthetic culture. Patients now are asking for less invasive, less painful, less expensive procedures with short recovery times. Thread-lifts are one of the newest approaches to nonsurgical facial tightening. However, are they of value? Where, and for whom?

Dr. Talakoub and Dr. Wesley are cocontributors to this column. Dr. Talakoub is in private practice in McLean, Va. Dr. Wesley practices dermatology in Beverly Hills, Calif. This month’s column is by Dr. Talakoub. Write to them at [email protected]. They had no relevant disclosures.

The rise of noninvasive procedures has shifted the aesthetic culture. Patients now are asking for less invasive, less painful, less expensive procedures with short recovery times. Thread-lifts are one of the newest approaches to nonsurgical facial tightening. However, are they of value? Where, and for whom?

Dr. Talakoub and Dr. Wesley are cocontributors to this column. Dr. Talakoub is in private practice in McLean, Va. Dr. Wesley practices dermatology in Beverly Hills, Calif. This month’s column is by Dr. Talakoub. Write to them at [email protected]. They had no relevant disclosures.

SAN ANTONIO – Dr. William A. Gradishar and Dr. Hope S. Rugo reflect on some familiar questions at the conclusion of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: Should young, high-risk women receive ovarian suppression? What is the optimal duration for trastuzumab therapy? What about extended aromatase inhibitor therapy? But new questions were considered as well, based on results presented at the 40th annual symposium.

Will combining a checkpoint inhibitor with trastuzumab help overcome trastuzumab resistance?

Are CDK 4/6 inhibitors here to stay?

Does acupuncture relieve joint pain in women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment?

The potential approval of a few novel agents in 2018 – an antibody-drug conjugate and a new PARP inhibitor – were also discussed in the video roundtable.

Dr. William A. Gradishar is the Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology at Northwestern University, Chicago. He had no disclosures to report. Dr. Hope S. Rugo is professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. She disclosed that she receives research funding (institutional) from Plexxikon, Macrogenics, OBI Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Genentech, and Merck.

SAN ANTONIO – Dr. William A. Gradishar and Dr. Hope S. Rugo reflect on some familiar questions at the conclusion of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: Should young, high-risk women receive ovarian suppression? What is the optimal duration for trastuzumab therapy? What about extended aromatase inhibitor therapy? But new questions were considered as well, based on results presented at the 40th annual symposium.

Will combining a checkpoint inhibitor with trastuzumab help overcome trastuzumab resistance?

Are CDK 4/6 inhibitors here to stay?

Does acupuncture relieve joint pain in women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment?

The potential approval of a few novel agents in 2018 – an antibody-drug conjugate and a new PARP inhibitor – were also discussed in the video roundtable.

Dr. William A. Gradishar is the Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology at Northwestern University, Chicago. He had no disclosures to report. Dr. Hope S. Rugo is professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. She disclosed that she receives research funding (institutional) from Plexxikon, Macrogenics, OBI Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Genentech, and Merck.

SAN ANTONIO – Dr. William A. Gradishar and Dr. Hope S. Rugo reflect on some familiar questions at the conclusion of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: Should young, high-risk women receive ovarian suppression? What is the optimal duration for trastuzumab therapy? What about extended aromatase inhibitor therapy? But new questions were considered as well, based on results presented at the 40th annual symposium.

Will combining a checkpoint inhibitor with trastuzumab help overcome trastuzumab resistance?

Are CDK 4/6 inhibitors here to stay?

Does acupuncture relieve joint pain in women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment?

The potential approval of a few novel agents in 2018 – an antibody-drug conjugate and a new PARP inhibitor – were also discussed in the video roundtable.

Dr. William A. Gradishar is the Betsy Bramsen Professor of Breast Oncology at Northwestern University, Chicago. He had no disclosures to report. Dr. Hope S. Rugo is professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. She disclosed that she receives research funding (institutional) from Plexxikon, Macrogenics, OBI Pharma, Eisai, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Genentech, and Merck.

Roughly 6 months ago, a primary care physician referred a patient to our clinic for an assessment for opioid use disorder and a recommendation for treatment. The patient estimated, likely underestimated, his daily heroin use to five bags and dropped positive, in addition to heroin, for benzodiazepines, amphetamines, and cannabis. He was in a profession in which public safety was a critical concern, and he refused to notify his employer’s employee assistance program. He also declined to voluntarily admit himself for detox and treatment at the local, fully accredited addiction program, which was affiliated with a major university medical center. Instead, after an Internet search, the patient opted for an opioid treatment center featuring massage therapy, acupuncture, a stable, a sweat lodge – and a magnificent view of the Pacific Ocean.

Dr. Marseille is a psychiatrist who works on the staff of a clinic in Wheaton, Ill. His special interests include adolescent and addiction medicine, eating disorders, trauma, bipolar disorder, and the psychiatric manifestations of acute and chronic medical conditions.

This article was updated 12/15/17.

Roughly 6 months ago, a primary care physician referred a patient to our clinic for an assessment for opioid use disorder and a recommendation for treatment. The patient estimated, likely underestimated, his daily heroin use to five bags and dropped positive, in addition to heroin, for benzodiazepines, amphetamines, and cannabis. He was in a profession in which public safety was a critical concern, and he refused to notify his employer’s employee assistance program. He also declined to voluntarily admit himself for detox and treatment at the local, fully accredited addiction program, which was affiliated with a major university medical center. Instead, after an Internet search, the patient opted for an opioid treatment center featuring massage therapy, acupuncture, a stable, a sweat lodge – and a magnificent view of the Pacific Ocean.

Dr. Marseille is a psychiatrist who works on the staff of a clinic in Wheaton, Ill. His special interests include adolescent and addiction medicine, eating disorders, trauma, bipolar disorder, and the psychiatric manifestations of acute and chronic medical conditions.

This article was updated 12/15/17.

Roughly 6 months ago, a primary care physician referred a patient to our clinic for an assessment for opioid use disorder and a recommendation for treatment. The patient estimated, likely underestimated, his daily heroin use to five bags and dropped positive, in addition to heroin, for benzodiazepines, amphetamines, and cannabis. He was in a profession in which public safety was a critical concern, and he refused to notify his employer’s employee assistance program. He also declined to voluntarily admit himself for detox and treatment at the local, fully accredited addiction program, which was affiliated with a major university medical center. Instead, after an Internet search, the patient opted for an opioid treatment center featuring massage therapy, acupuncture, a stable, a sweat lodge – and a magnificent view of the Pacific Ocean.

Dr. Marseille is a psychiatrist who works on the staff of a clinic in Wheaton, Ill. His special interests include adolescent and addiction medicine, eating disorders, trauma, bipolar disorder, and the psychiatric manifestations of acute and chronic medical conditions.

This article was updated 12/15/17.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a premixed sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution (Clenpiq) for cleansing of the colon in adults preparing to undergo colonoscopy, according to Ferring Pharmaceuticals.

The sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution is a relatively low-volume, premixed, cranberry-flavored solution, making it easier to use and more palatable for patients.

The oral solution is approved with two dosing options: split dose, one dose the evening prior and one dose the morning of the procedure, or the day before dose, which involves taking both doses the day prior to the procedure. Day before dosing is an alternative and should be used when split dosing is not appropriate. After each dose of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution, clear liquids should be consumed based on the dosing recommendation. The American College of Gastroenterology recommends the split-dose regimen because of its improved cleansing quality of the colon and better tolerability of the liquid volume by patients.

Patients with impaired renal function should exercise caution if using sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution as it may effect renal function. A more comprehensive list of safety information is available at www.clenpiq.com.
 

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a premixed sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution (Clenpiq) for cleansing of the colon in adults preparing to undergo colonoscopy, according to Ferring Pharmaceuticals.

The sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution is a relatively low-volume, premixed, cranberry-flavored solution, making it easier to use and more palatable for patients.

The oral solution is approved with two dosing options: split dose, one dose the evening prior and one dose the morning of the procedure, or the day before dose, which involves taking both doses the day prior to the procedure. Day before dosing is an alternative and should be used when split dosing is not appropriate. After each dose of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution, clear liquids should be consumed based on the dosing recommendation. The American College of Gastroenterology recommends the split-dose regimen because of its improved cleansing quality of the colon and better tolerability of the liquid volume by patients.

Patients with impaired renal function should exercise caution if using sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution as it may effect renal function. A more comprehensive list of safety information is available at www.clenpiq.com.
 

[email protected]

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a premixed sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution (Clenpiq) for cleansing of the colon in adults preparing to undergo colonoscopy, according to Ferring Pharmaceuticals.

The sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution is a relatively low-volume, premixed, cranberry-flavored solution, making it easier to use and more palatable for patients.

The oral solution is approved with two dosing options: split dose, one dose the evening prior and one dose the morning of the procedure, or the day before dose, which involves taking both doses the day prior to the procedure. Day before dosing is an alternative and should be used when split dosing is not appropriate. After each dose of sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution, clear liquids should be consumed based on the dosing recommendation. The American College of Gastroenterology recommends the split-dose regimen because of its improved cleansing quality of the colon and better tolerability of the liquid volume by patients.

Patients with impaired renal function should exercise caution if using sodium picosulfate, magnesium oxide, and anhydrous citric acid oral solution as it may effect renal function. A more comprehensive list of safety information is available at www.clenpiq.com.
 

[email protected]

The investigational drug sprifermin significantly increased cartilage thickness in the tibiofemoral joint of patients with knee osteoarthritis in the initial 2-year results of the ongoing FORWARD trial.

“Sprifermin appears to be the first investigational medicinal product to show dose-dependent prevention of cartilage loss and an increase in cartilage thickness, not only in the total tibiofemoral joint [TFJ] but also in both the medial and lateral compartments, including the central medial femorotibial region,” said Marc H. Hochberg, MD, primary investigator in the trial and division head of rheumatology and clinical immunology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. “The recommendation is that these findings should be further evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials.”

SOURCE: Hochberg M et al. ACR 2017 Abstract 1L.

The investigational drug sprifermin significantly increased cartilage thickness in the tibiofemoral joint of patients with knee osteoarthritis in the initial 2-year results of the ongoing FORWARD trial.

“Sprifermin appears to be the first investigational medicinal product to show dose-dependent prevention of cartilage loss and an increase in cartilage thickness, not only in the total tibiofemoral joint [TFJ] but also in both the medial and lateral compartments, including the central medial femorotibial region,” said Marc H. Hochberg, MD, primary investigator in the trial and division head of rheumatology and clinical immunology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. “The recommendation is that these findings should be further evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials.”

SOURCE: Hochberg M et al. ACR 2017 Abstract 1L.

The investigational drug sprifermin significantly increased cartilage thickness in the tibiofemoral joint of patients with knee osteoarthritis in the initial 2-year results of the ongoing FORWARD trial.

“Sprifermin appears to be the first investigational medicinal product to show dose-dependent prevention of cartilage loss and an increase in cartilage thickness, not only in the total tibiofemoral joint [TFJ] but also in both the medial and lateral compartments, including the central medial femorotibial region,” said Marc H. Hochberg, MD, primary investigator in the trial and division head of rheumatology and clinical immunology at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. “The recommendation is that these findings should be further evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials.”

SOURCE: Hochberg M et al. ACR 2017 Abstract 1L.