Young vascular surgeons looking to make their marks and balance their lives, as well as more experienced surgeons seeking tips for more effective practice and career management, should consider the session led by Jeffrey Siracuse, MD, of Boston Medical Center, and Courtney Warner, MD, of Albany Medical College, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.

“This will be a great and informative session that, although geared toward young surgeons, will be highly useful for surgeons of all experience levels,” Dr. Siracuse said of the session.

Friday, June 22

1:30 – 3:00 p.m.

HCC, Room 311

C5: Practice Management Tips and Tricks for Young Vascular Surgeons

Young vascular surgeons looking to make their marks and balance their lives, as well as more experienced surgeons seeking tips for more effective practice and career management, should consider the session led by Jeffrey Siracuse, MD, of Boston Medical Center, and Courtney Warner, MD, of Albany Medical College, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.

“This will be a great and informative session that, although geared toward young surgeons, will be highly useful for surgeons of all experience levels,” Dr. Siracuse said of the session.

Friday, June 22

1:30 – 3:00 p.m.

HCC, Room 311

C5: Practice Management Tips and Tricks for Young Vascular Surgeons

Young vascular surgeons looking to make their marks and balance their lives, as well as more experienced surgeons seeking tips for more effective practice and career management, should consider the session led by Jeffrey Siracuse, MD, of Boston Medical Center, and Courtney Warner, MD, of Albany Medical College, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.

“This will be a great and informative session that, although geared toward young surgeons, will be highly useful for surgeons of all experience levels,” Dr. Siracuse said of the session.

Friday, June 22

1:30 – 3:00 p.m.

HCC, Room 311

C5: Practice Management Tips and Tricks for Young Vascular Surgeons

Mark the closing of the Exhibit Hall by attending the Closing Reception, set for 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Friday in the Auditorium on Level 2 of the Hynes Convention Center.

VAM attendees have one more chance to visit with vendors and check out innovations in devices and medications. Guests have another to meet with friends old and new, to relax, and to enjoy cocktails and hors d’oeuvres.

Mark the closing of the Exhibit Hall by attending the Closing Reception, set for 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Friday in the Auditorium on Level 2 of the Hynes Convention Center.

VAM attendees have one more chance to visit with vendors and check out innovations in devices and medications. Guests have another to meet with friends old and new, to relax, and to enjoy cocktails and hors d’oeuvres.

Mark the closing of the Exhibit Hall by attending the Closing Reception, set for 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Friday in the Auditorium on Level 2 of the Hynes Convention Center.

VAM attendees have one more chance to visit with vendors and check out innovations in devices and medications. Guests have another to meet with friends old and new, to relax, and to enjoy cocktails and hors d’oeuvres.

The team approach has changed the entire field of medicine in the past 10-20 years and, in fact, is critical to optimal patient outcomes. That’s according to Anil Hingorani, MD, who will co-moderate a special forum Friday, “Improving Clinical Metrics With the Utilization of Advanced Practice Providers.”
 

It will be held from 1:30 to 3 p.m. in Ballroom A/B.

The team approach is front and center at this year’s Vascular Annual Meeting, which carries the theme: “Home of the Vascular Team – Partners in Patient Care.”

“Our vascular disease patients can be quite complex,” said Dr. Hingorani. “We will highlight that to take care of these complexities we need a team approach, and our team members can help tremendously.” This is true across the setting spectrum, be it rural, urban, suburban.

“Some NPs and PAs run our service. They help coordinate pre-op evaluations, post-op management, take care of research protocols, billing, and other office responsibilities,” he said.

He pointed out he is not a specialist in diabetes, but that his NP has a special interest and passion for the topic. The work she does for their diabetic patients “helps MY patients and helps MY procedures have better outcomes.”

PAs and NPs also help run research projects and are instrumental in working with fellows rotating through. With their work in what Dr. Hingorani referred to as the “three pillars” – clinical work, teaching, and research – they are tremendously important to the vascular team.

• Improving Metrics in Clinical Practice: The Value of APPs to a Vascular Practice
• There’s an APP for That: Workforce and Community Practice Experience
• National and International Trends in the Use of APPs, PAs in Surgery and Outcome Data
• Improving Metrics via Team-Based Care: The Wake Forest Baptist Health Experience
• Influence of APPs - MIPS and “Throughput” of Patients, Value/Quality/Financial Benefit and APPs
• Funny You Should Ask: What Advanced Practice Providers Bring to the Table
• How Advanced Practice Clinicians Can Add Value to Your Practice
• Driving Outcomes: University of Maryland Advanced Practice Providers Target Preventable Complications, Length of Stay, and Readmissions Univers LT Std

The team approach has changed the entire field of medicine in the past 10-20 years and, in fact, is critical to optimal patient outcomes. That’s according to Anil Hingorani, MD, who will co-moderate a special forum Friday, “Improving Clinical Metrics With the Utilization of Advanced Practice Providers.”
 

It will be held from 1:30 to 3 p.m. in Ballroom A/B.

The team approach is front and center at this year’s Vascular Annual Meeting, which carries the theme: “Home of the Vascular Team – Partners in Patient Care.”

“Our vascular disease patients can be quite complex,” said Dr. Hingorani. “We will highlight that to take care of these complexities we need a team approach, and our team members can help tremendously.” This is true across the setting spectrum, be it rural, urban, suburban.

“Some NPs and PAs run our service. They help coordinate pre-op evaluations, post-op management, take care of research protocols, billing, and other office responsibilities,” he said.

He pointed out he is not a specialist in diabetes, but that his NP has a special interest and passion for the topic. The work she does for their diabetic patients “helps MY patients and helps MY procedures have better outcomes.”

PAs and NPs also help run research projects and are instrumental in working with fellows rotating through. With their work in what Dr. Hingorani referred to as the “three pillars” – clinical work, teaching, and research – they are tremendously important to the vascular team.

• Improving Metrics in Clinical Practice: The Value of APPs to a Vascular Practice
• There’s an APP for That: Workforce and Community Practice Experience
• National and International Trends in the Use of APPs, PAs in Surgery and Outcome Data
• Improving Metrics via Team-Based Care: The Wake Forest Baptist Health Experience
• Influence of APPs - MIPS and “Throughput” of Patients, Value/Quality/Financial Benefit and APPs
• Funny You Should Ask: What Advanced Practice Providers Bring to the Table
• How Advanced Practice Clinicians Can Add Value to Your Practice
• Driving Outcomes: University of Maryland Advanced Practice Providers Target Preventable Complications, Length of Stay, and Readmissions Univers LT Std

The team approach has changed the entire field of medicine in the past 10-20 years and, in fact, is critical to optimal patient outcomes. That’s according to Anil Hingorani, MD, who will co-moderate a special forum Friday, “Improving Clinical Metrics With the Utilization of Advanced Practice Providers.”
 

It will be held from 1:30 to 3 p.m. in Ballroom A/B.

The team approach is front and center at this year’s Vascular Annual Meeting, which carries the theme: “Home of the Vascular Team – Partners in Patient Care.”

“Our vascular disease patients can be quite complex,” said Dr. Hingorani. “We will highlight that to take care of these complexities we need a team approach, and our team members can help tremendously.” This is true across the setting spectrum, be it rural, urban, suburban.

“Some NPs and PAs run our service. They help coordinate pre-op evaluations, post-op management, take care of research protocols, billing, and other office responsibilities,” he said.

He pointed out he is not a specialist in diabetes, but that his NP has a special interest and passion for the topic. The work she does for their diabetic patients “helps MY patients and helps MY procedures have better outcomes.”

PAs and NPs also help run research projects and are instrumental in working with fellows rotating through. With their work in what Dr. Hingorani referred to as the “three pillars” – clinical work, teaching, and research – they are tremendously important to the vascular team.

• Improving Metrics in Clinical Practice: The Value of APPs to a Vascular Practice
• There’s an APP for That: Workforce and Community Practice Experience
• National and International Trends in the Use of APPs, PAs in Surgery and Outcome Data
• Improving Metrics via Team-Based Care: The Wake Forest Baptist Health Experience
• Influence of APPs - MIPS and “Throughput” of Patients, Value/Quality/Financial Benefit and APPs
• Funny You Should Ask: What Advanced Practice Providers Bring to the Table
• How Advanced Practice Clinicians Can Add Value to Your Practice
• Driving Outcomes: University of Maryland Advanced Practice Providers Target Preventable Complications, Length of Stay, and Readmissions Univers LT Std

A form of behavioral therapy that focuses on enhancing emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and improving quality of life has shown promise in reducing self-harm and suicide attempts in adolescents, according to new research.

In a paper published in JAMA Psychiatry, researchers reported the outcomes of a randomized trial of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) versus individual and group supportive therapy in 173 adolescents with a history of suicide attempts.

DBT, developed by Marsha Linehan, PhD, as a team-based intervention for chronically suicidal patients with borderline personality disorder, is aimed at getting patients to focus on changing their behaviors so that they are able to meet their long-term goals. The use of DBT with adults has been tied to low dropout rates, and has been effective at reducing suicide attempts and self-harm.

In the study, the DBT consisted of weekly individual psychotherapy, multifamily group skills training, youth and parent telephone coaching, and a weekly therapist team consultation. The control group took part in individual sessions, group therapy, as-needed parent sessions, and a weekly therapist team consultation.

Researchers saw a 70% lower rate of suicide attempts, 68% lower rate of nonsuicidal self-injury, and 67% lower rate of self-harm in the DBT group, compared with the control group at the end of the 6-month treatment course. However, at 12 months, the differences between the two groups were no longer statistically significant.

“This is the first adolescent RCT [randomized, controlled trial] to our knowledge to demonstrate that DBT is effective at decreasing suicide attempts,” Elizabeth A. McCauley, PhD, of the Seattle Children’s Research Institute, and her coauthors.

At 6 months, 46.5% of the DBT group showed an absence of self-harm, compared with 27.6% of the control group. At 12 months, those figures were 51.2% and 32.2% respectively.

Significantly, more participants in the DBT group completed the treatment, compared with those in individual and group supportive therapy (75.6% vs. 55.2%), although this did not appear to be responsible for the difference in outcomes.

“Although results of pattern-mixture models found no evidence of an informative attrition mechanism, we cannot rule out the possibility that differential treatment exposure is a mechanism that leads to the DBT outcomes,” the authors wrote. “Stronger DBT treatment retention is, however, an important finding given prior research that found difficulties with treatment engagement, and adherence among suicidal and self-harming youths.”

Parents were involved in both treatments, but “DBT included greater family involvement,” Dr. McCauley and her coauthors wrote. “This difference may have contributed to both greater retention and treatment effects, particularly because stronger family components are associated with treatment benefits for adolescent self-harm.”

The authors said the fact that both groups improved after 12 months provided support for the individual and group supportive therapy in these patients.

“Our findings add to data supporting other promising treatment approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mentalization-based therapy, and family-based treatments,” they concluded

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health. Eight authors declared grant support from NIMH, and two authors declared other funding unrelated to the study.

SOURCE: McCauley EA et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 20. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109.
 

A form of behavioral therapy that focuses on enhancing emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and improving quality of life has shown promise in reducing self-harm and suicide attempts in adolescents, according to new research.

In a paper published in JAMA Psychiatry, researchers reported the outcomes of a randomized trial of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) versus individual and group supportive therapy in 173 adolescents with a history of suicide attempts.

DBT, developed by Marsha Linehan, PhD, as a team-based intervention for chronically suicidal patients with borderline personality disorder, is aimed at getting patients to focus on changing their behaviors so that they are able to meet their long-term goals. The use of DBT with adults has been tied to low dropout rates, and has been effective at reducing suicide attempts and self-harm.

In the study, the DBT consisted of weekly individual psychotherapy, multifamily group skills training, youth and parent telephone coaching, and a weekly therapist team consultation. The control group took part in individual sessions, group therapy, as-needed parent sessions, and a weekly therapist team consultation.

Researchers saw a 70% lower rate of suicide attempts, 68% lower rate of nonsuicidal self-injury, and 67% lower rate of self-harm in the DBT group, compared with the control group at the end of the 6-month treatment course. However, at 12 months, the differences between the two groups were no longer statistically significant.

“This is the first adolescent RCT [randomized, controlled trial] to our knowledge to demonstrate that DBT is effective at decreasing suicide attempts,” Elizabeth A. McCauley, PhD, of the Seattle Children’s Research Institute, and her coauthors.

At 6 months, 46.5% of the DBT group showed an absence of self-harm, compared with 27.6% of the control group. At 12 months, those figures were 51.2% and 32.2% respectively.

Significantly, more participants in the DBT group completed the treatment, compared with those in individual and group supportive therapy (75.6% vs. 55.2%), although this did not appear to be responsible for the difference in outcomes.

“Although results of pattern-mixture models found no evidence of an informative attrition mechanism, we cannot rule out the possibility that differential treatment exposure is a mechanism that leads to the DBT outcomes,” the authors wrote. “Stronger DBT treatment retention is, however, an important finding given prior research that found difficulties with treatment engagement, and adherence among suicidal and self-harming youths.”

Parents were involved in both treatments, but “DBT included greater family involvement,” Dr. McCauley and her coauthors wrote. “This difference may have contributed to both greater retention and treatment effects, particularly because stronger family components are associated with treatment benefits for adolescent self-harm.”

The authors said the fact that both groups improved after 12 months provided support for the individual and group supportive therapy in these patients.

“Our findings add to data supporting other promising treatment approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mentalization-based therapy, and family-based treatments,” they concluded

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health. Eight authors declared grant support from NIMH, and two authors declared other funding unrelated to the study.

SOURCE: McCauley EA et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 20. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109.
 

A form of behavioral therapy that focuses on enhancing emotion regulation, distress tolerance, and improving quality of life has shown promise in reducing self-harm and suicide attempts in adolescents, according to new research.

In a paper published in JAMA Psychiatry, researchers reported the outcomes of a randomized trial of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) versus individual and group supportive therapy in 173 adolescents with a history of suicide attempts.

DBT, developed by Marsha Linehan, PhD, as a team-based intervention for chronically suicidal patients with borderline personality disorder, is aimed at getting patients to focus on changing their behaviors so that they are able to meet their long-term goals. The use of DBT with adults has been tied to low dropout rates, and has been effective at reducing suicide attempts and self-harm.

In the study, the DBT consisted of weekly individual psychotherapy, multifamily group skills training, youth and parent telephone coaching, and a weekly therapist team consultation. The control group took part in individual sessions, group therapy, as-needed parent sessions, and a weekly therapist team consultation.

Researchers saw a 70% lower rate of suicide attempts, 68% lower rate of nonsuicidal self-injury, and 67% lower rate of self-harm in the DBT group, compared with the control group at the end of the 6-month treatment course. However, at 12 months, the differences between the two groups were no longer statistically significant.

“This is the first adolescent RCT [randomized, controlled trial] to our knowledge to demonstrate that DBT is effective at decreasing suicide attempts,” Elizabeth A. McCauley, PhD, of the Seattle Children’s Research Institute, and her coauthors.

At 6 months, 46.5% of the DBT group showed an absence of self-harm, compared with 27.6% of the control group. At 12 months, those figures were 51.2% and 32.2% respectively.

Significantly, more participants in the DBT group completed the treatment, compared with those in individual and group supportive therapy (75.6% vs. 55.2%), although this did not appear to be responsible for the difference in outcomes.

“Although results of pattern-mixture models found no evidence of an informative attrition mechanism, we cannot rule out the possibility that differential treatment exposure is a mechanism that leads to the DBT outcomes,” the authors wrote. “Stronger DBT treatment retention is, however, an important finding given prior research that found difficulties with treatment engagement, and adherence among suicidal and self-harming youths.”

Parents were involved in both treatments, but “DBT included greater family involvement,” Dr. McCauley and her coauthors wrote. “This difference may have contributed to both greater retention and treatment effects, particularly because stronger family components are associated with treatment benefits for adolescent self-harm.”

The authors said the fact that both groups improved after 12 months provided support for the individual and group supportive therapy in these patients.

“Our findings add to data supporting other promising treatment approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, mentalization-based therapy, and family-based treatments,” they concluded

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health. Eight authors declared grant support from NIMH, and two authors declared other funding unrelated to the study.

SOURCE: McCauley EA et al. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 20. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109.
 

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract, usually arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal or similar cells in the outer wall of the gastrointestinal tract.^1,2 Most GISTs have an activating mutation in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Tumor size, mitotic rate, and anatomic site are the most common pathological features used to risk stratify GIST tumors.^3-10 It is important to note when using such risk calculators that preoperative imatinib before determining tumor characteristics (such as mitoses per 50 high-power fields [hpf]) often changes the relevant parameters so that the same risk calculations may not apply. Tumors with a mitotic rate ≤5 mitoses per 50 hpf and a size ≤5 cm in greatest dimension have a lower recurrence rate after resection than tumors with a mitotic rate >5 mitoses per 50 hpf and a size >10 cm, and larger tumors can have a recurrence rate of up to 86%.^11,12 Findings from a large observational study have suggested that the prognosis of gastric GIST in Korea and Japan may be more favorable compared with that in Western countries.¹³

The primary treatment of a localized primary GIST is surgical excision, but a cure is limited by recurrence.^14,15 Imatinib is useful in the treatment of metastatic or recurrent GIST, and adjuvant treatment with imatinib after surgery has been shown to improve progression-free and overall survival in some cases.^3,16-18 Responses to adjuvant imatinib depend on tumor sensitivity to the drug and the risk of recurrence. Drug sensitivity is largely dependent on the presence of mutations in KIT or PDGFRA.^3,18 Recurrence risk is highly dependent on tumor size, tumor site, tumor rupture, and mitotic index.^{1,3,5,6,8,9,18,19} Findings on the use of gene expression patterns to predict recurrence risk have also been reported.^20-27 However, recurrence risk is poorly understood for categories in which there are few cases with known outcomes, such as very small gastric GIST with a high mitotic index. For example, few cases of gastric GIST have been reported with a tumor size ≤2 cm, a mitotic rate >5 mitoses per 50 hpf, and adequate clinical follow-up. In such cases, it is difficult to assess the risk of recurrence.⁶ We report here the long-term outcome of a patient with a 1.8 cm gastric GIST with a mitotic index of 36 mitoses per 50 hpf and a KIT exon 11 mutation.

Case presentation and summary

A 69-year-old man presented with periumbilical and epigastric pain of 6-month duration. His medical history was notable for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary angioplasty, and spinal surgery. He had a 40 pack-year smoking history and consumed 2 to 4 alcoholic drinks per day. The results of a physical examination were unremarkable. A computedtomographic (CT) scan showed no abnormalities. An esophagoduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed gastric ulcers. He was treated successfully with omeprazole 20 mg by mouth daily.

A month later, a follow-up EGD revealed a 1.8 × 1.5 cm submucosal mass 3 cm from the gastroesophageal junction. The patient underwent a fundus wedge resection, and a submucosal mass 1.8 cm in greatest dimension was removed. Pathologic examination revealed a GIST, spindle cell type, with a mitotic rate of 36 mitoses per 50 hpf with negative margins. Immunohistochemistry was positive for CD117. An exon 11 deletion (KVV558-560NV) was present in KIT. The patient’s risk of recurrence was unclear, and his follow-up included CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis every 3 to 4 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 2.5 years.

A CT scan about 3.5 years after primary resection revealed small nonspecific liver hypodensities that became more prominent during the next year. About 5 years after primary resection, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed several liver lesions, the largest of which measured at 1.3 cm in greatest dimension. The patient’s liver metastases were readily identified by MRI (Figure 1) and CT imaging (Figure 2A).

Discussion

Small gastric GISTs are sometimes found by endoscopy performed for unrelated reasons. Recent data suggest that the incidence of gastric GIST may be higher than previously thought. In a Japanese study of patients with gastric cancer in which 100 stomachs were systematically examined pathologically, 50 microscopic GISTs were found in 35 patients.²⁸ Most small gastric GISTs have a low mitotic index. Few cases have been described with a high mitotic index. In a study of 1765 cases of GIST of the stomach, 8 patients had a tumor size less than 2 cm and a mitotic index greater than 5. Of those, only 6 patients had long-term follow-up, and 3 were alive without disease at 2, 17, and 20 years of follow-up.⁷ These limited data make it impossible to predict outcomes in patients with small gastric GIST with a high mitotic index.

For patients who are at high risk of recurrence after surgery, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib treatment compared with 1 year has been shown to improve overall survival and is the current standard of care.^10,17 A study comparing 5 and 3 years of imatinib is ongoing to establish whether a longer period of adjuvant treatment is warranted. In patients with metastatic GIST, lifelong imatinib until lack of benefit is considered optimal treatment.¹⁰ All patients should undergo KIT mutation analysis. Those with the PDGFRA D842V mutation, SDH (succinate dehydrogenase) deficiency, or neurofibromatosis-related GIST should not receive adjuvant imatinib.

This case has several unusual features. The small tumor size with a very high mitotic rate is rare. Such cases have not been reported in large numbers and have therefore not been reliably incorporated into risk prediction algorithms. In addition, despite a high mitotic index, the tumor was not FDG avid on PET imaging. The diagnosis of GIST is strongly supported by the KIT mutation and response to imatinib. This particular KIT mutation in larger GISTs is associated with aggressive disease. The present case adds to the data on the biology of small gastric GISTs with a high mitotic index and suggests the mitotic index in these tumors may be a more important predictor than size.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Michael Franklin, MS, for editorial assistance, and Sabrina Porter for media edits.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract, usually arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal or similar cells in the outer wall of the gastrointestinal tract.^1,2 Most GISTs have an activating mutation in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Tumor size, mitotic rate, and anatomic site are the most common pathological features used to risk stratify GIST tumors.^3-10 It is important to note when using such risk calculators that preoperative imatinib before determining tumor characteristics (such as mitoses per 50 high-power fields [hpf]) often changes the relevant parameters so that the same risk calculations may not apply. Tumors with a mitotic rate ≤5 mitoses per 50 hpf and a size ≤5 cm in greatest dimension have a lower recurrence rate after resection than tumors with a mitotic rate >5 mitoses per 50 hpf and a size >10 cm, and larger tumors can have a recurrence rate of up to 86%.^11,12 Findings from a large observational study have suggested that the prognosis of gastric GIST in Korea and Japan may be more favorable compared with that in Western countries.¹³

The primary treatment of a localized primary GIST is surgical excision, but a cure is limited by recurrence.^14,15 Imatinib is useful in the treatment of metastatic or recurrent GIST, and adjuvant treatment with imatinib after surgery has been shown to improve progression-free and overall survival in some cases.^3,16-18 Responses to adjuvant imatinib depend on tumor sensitivity to the drug and the risk of recurrence. Drug sensitivity is largely dependent on the presence of mutations in KIT or PDGFRA.^3,18 Recurrence risk is highly dependent on tumor size, tumor site, tumor rupture, and mitotic index.^{1,3,5,6,8,9,18,19} Findings on the use of gene expression patterns to predict recurrence risk have also been reported.^20-27 However, recurrence risk is poorly understood for categories in which there are few cases with known outcomes, such as very small gastric GIST with a high mitotic index. For example, few cases of gastric GIST have been reported with a tumor size ≤2 cm, a mitotic rate >5 mitoses per 50 hpf, and adequate clinical follow-up. In such cases, it is difficult to assess the risk of recurrence.⁶ We report here the long-term outcome of a patient with a 1.8 cm gastric GIST with a mitotic index of 36 mitoses per 50 hpf and a KIT exon 11 mutation.

Case presentation and summary

A 69-year-old man presented with periumbilical and epigastric pain of 6-month duration. His medical history was notable for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary angioplasty, and spinal surgery. He had a 40 pack-year smoking history and consumed 2 to 4 alcoholic drinks per day. The results of a physical examination were unremarkable. A computedtomographic (CT) scan showed no abnormalities. An esophagoduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed gastric ulcers. He was treated successfully with omeprazole 20 mg by mouth daily.

A month later, a follow-up EGD revealed a 1.8 × 1.5 cm submucosal mass 3 cm from the gastroesophageal junction. The patient underwent a fundus wedge resection, and a submucosal mass 1.8 cm in greatest dimension was removed. Pathologic examination revealed a GIST, spindle cell type, with a mitotic rate of 36 mitoses per 50 hpf with negative margins. Immunohistochemistry was positive for CD117. An exon 11 deletion (KVV558-560NV) was present in KIT. The patient’s risk of recurrence was unclear, and his follow-up included CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis every 3 to 4 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 2.5 years.

A CT scan about 3.5 years after primary resection revealed small nonspecific liver hypodensities that became more prominent during the next year. About 5 years after primary resection, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed several liver lesions, the largest of which measured at 1.3 cm in greatest dimension. The patient’s liver metastases were readily identified by MRI (Figure 1) and CT imaging (Figure 2A).

Discussion

Small gastric GISTs are sometimes found by endoscopy performed for unrelated reasons. Recent data suggest that the incidence of gastric GIST may be higher than previously thought. In a Japanese study of patients with gastric cancer in which 100 stomachs were systematically examined pathologically, 50 microscopic GISTs were found in 35 patients.²⁸ Most small gastric GISTs have a low mitotic index. Few cases have been described with a high mitotic index. In a study of 1765 cases of GIST of the stomach, 8 patients had a tumor size less than 2 cm and a mitotic index greater than 5. Of those, only 6 patients had long-term follow-up, and 3 were alive without disease at 2, 17, and 20 years of follow-up.⁷ These limited data make it impossible to predict outcomes in patients with small gastric GIST with a high mitotic index.

For patients who are at high risk of recurrence after surgery, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib treatment compared with 1 year has been shown to improve overall survival and is the current standard of care.^10,17 A study comparing 5 and 3 years of imatinib is ongoing to establish whether a longer period of adjuvant treatment is warranted. In patients with metastatic GIST, lifelong imatinib until lack of benefit is considered optimal treatment.¹⁰ All patients should undergo KIT mutation analysis. Those with the PDGFRA D842V mutation, SDH (succinate dehydrogenase) deficiency, or neurofibromatosis-related GIST should not receive adjuvant imatinib.

This case has several unusual features. The small tumor size with a very high mitotic rate is rare. Such cases have not been reported in large numbers and have therefore not been reliably incorporated into risk prediction algorithms. In addition, despite a high mitotic index, the tumor was not FDG avid on PET imaging. The diagnosis of GIST is strongly supported by the KIT mutation and response to imatinib. This particular KIT mutation in larger GISTs is associated with aggressive disease. The present case adds to the data on the biology of small gastric GISTs with a high mitotic index and suggests the mitotic index in these tumors may be a more important predictor than size.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Michael Franklin, MS, for editorial assistance, and Sabrina Porter for media edits.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract, usually arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal or similar cells in the outer wall of the gastrointestinal tract.^1,2 Most GISTs have an activating mutation in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). Tumor size, mitotic rate, and anatomic site are the most common pathological features used to risk stratify GIST tumors.^3-10 It is important to note when using such risk calculators that preoperative imatinib before determining tumor characteristics (such as mitoses per 50 high-power fields [hpf]) often changes the relevant parameters so that the same risk calculations may not apply. Tumors with a mitotic rate ≤5 mitoses per 50 hpf and a size ≤5 cm in greatest dimension have a lower recurrence rate after resection than tumors with a mitotic rate >5 mitoses per 50 hpf and a size >10 cm, and larger tumors can have a recurrence rate of up to 86%.^11,12 Findings from a large observational study have suggested that the prognosis of gastric GIST in Korea and Japan may be more favorable compared with that in Western countries.¹³

The primary treatment of a localized primary GIST is surgical excision, but a cure is limited by recurrence.^14,15 Imatinib is useful in the treatment of metastatic or recurrent GIST, and adjuvant treatment with imatinib after surgery has been shown to improve progression-free and overall survival in some cases.^3,16-18 Responses to adjuvant imatinib depend on tumor sensitivity to the drug and the risk of recurrence. Drug sensitivity is largely dependent on the presence of mutations in KIT or PDGFRA.^3,18 Recurrence risk is highly dependent on tumor size, tumor site, tumor rupture, and mitotic index.^{1,3,5,6,8,9,18,19} Findings on the use of gene expression patterns to predict recurrence risk have also been reported.^20-27 However, recurrence risk is poorly understood for categories in which there are few cases with known outcomes, such as very small gastric GIST with a high mitotic index. For example, few cases of gastric GIST have been reported with a tumor size ≤2 cm, a mitotic rate >5 mitoses per 50 hpf, and adequate clinical follow-up. In such cases, it is difficult to assess the risk of recurrence.⁶ We report here the long-term outcome of a patient with a 1.8 cm gastric GIST with a mitotic index of 36 mitoses per 50 hpf and a KIT exon 11 mutation.

Case presentation and summary

A 69-year-old man presented with periumbilical and epigastric pain of 6-month duration. His medical history was notable for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, coronary angioplasty, and spinal surgery. He had a 40 pack-year smoking history and consumed 2 to 4 alcoholic drinks per day. The results of a physical examination were unremarkable. A computedtomographic (CT) scan showed no abnormalities. An esophagoduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed gastric ulcers. He was treated successfully with omeprazole 20 mg by mouth daily.

A month later, a follow-up EGD revealed a 1.8 × 1.5 cm submucosal mass 3 cm from the gastroesophageal junction. The patient underwent a fundus wedge resection, and a submucosal mass 1.8 cm in greatest dimension was removed. Pathologic examination revealed a GIST, spindle cell type, with a mitotic rate of 36 mitoses per 50 hpf with negative margins. Immunohistochemistry was positive for CD117. An exon 11 deletion (KVV558-560NV) was present in KIT. The patient’s risk of recurrence was unclear, and his follow-up included CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis every 3 to 4 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for the next 2.5 years.

A CT scan about 3.5 years after primary resection revealed small nonspecific liver hypodensities that became more prominent during the next year. About 5 years after primary resection, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed several liver lesions, the largest of which measured at 1.3 cm in greatest dimension. The patient’s liver metastases were readily identified by MRI (Figure 1) and CT imaging (Figure 2A).

Discussion

Small gastric GISTs are sometimes found by endoscopy performed for unrelated reasons. Recent data suggest that the incidence of gastric GIST may be higher than previously thought. In a Japanese study of patients with gastric cancer in which 100 stomachs were systematically examined pathologically, 50 microscopic GISTs were found in 35 patients.²⁸ Most small gastric GISTs have a low mitotic index. Few cases have been described with a high mitotic index. In a study of 1765 cases of GIST of the stomach, 8 patients had a tumor size less than 2 cm and a mitotic index greater than 5. Of those, only 6 patients had long-term follow-up, and 3 were alive without disease at 2, 17, and 20 years of follow-up.⁷ These limited data make it impossible to predict outcomes in patients with small gastric GIST with a high mitotic index.

For patients who are at high risk of recurrence after surgery, 3 years of adjuvant imatinib treatment compared with 1 year has been shown to improve overall survival and is the current standard of care.^10,17 A study comparing 5 and 3 years of imatinib is ongoing to establish whether a longer period of adjuvant treatment is warranted. In patients with metastatic GIST, lifelong imatinib until lack of benefit is considered optimal treatment.¹⁰ All patients should undergo KIT mutation analysis. Those with the PDGFRA D842V mutation, SDH (succinate dehydrogenase) deficiency, or neurofibromatosis-related GIST should not receive adjuvant imatinib.

This case has several unusual features. The small tumor size with a very high mitotic rate is rare. Such cases have not been reported in large numbers and have therefore not been reliably incorporated into risk prediction algorithms. In addition, despite a high mitotic index, the tumor was not FDG avid on PET imaging. The diagnosis of GIST is strongly supported by the KIT mutation and response to imatinib. This particular KIT mutation in larger GISTs is associated with aggressive disease. The present case adds to the data on the biology of small gastric GISTs with a high mitotic index and suggests the mitotic index in these tumors may be a more important predictor than size.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Michael Franklin, MS, for editorial assistance, and Sabrina Porter for media edits.

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide.¹ Despite advances in the treatment of the disease and development of targeted therapy, the 5-year overall survival in stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer remains poor, ranging from 6% to 10%.² More recently, checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the treatment of lung cancer. Nivolumab was the first program cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor approved for malignant melanoma.³ In July 2015, it was approved as a second-line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.⁴ Since then, the use of nivolumab has extended to other malignancies such as head and neck cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and the list continues to expand. In lung cancer, it demonstrated superior overall survival of 9 months, compared with 6 months with docetaxel.⁴ Other checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab⁵ and atezolizumab⁶ were subsequently developed, and are also used in the treatment of lung cancer.

Serious potential autoimmune complications arise in up to 30% of patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Dermatologic toxicity is the most common immune-related adverse event in these patients. In addition to vitiligo, most common is a reticular maculopapular rash on the trunk and extremities. Other adverse events, such as photosensitivity, alopecia, xerosis, and hair color changes, are reported less frequently.⁷ We report here a case of rash at an unusual location (auricular and periauricular) with skin exfoliation mimicking other common skin conditions such as eczema and psoriasis.
 

Case presentation and summary

A 57-year-old woman with a history of cerebrovascular accident with residual left lower-leg paresis presented for acute onset expressive aphasia in the absence of other constitutional or neurological findings. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a posterior, left parietal lobe lesion of 1.6 cm with intralesional hemorrhage and surrounding edema suggestive of brain metastasis. The patient had a 35 pack-year history of smoking. A staging work-up with computed-tomographic (CT) scans showed a spiculated enhancing nodule in the superior segment of the right lower lobe plus mediastinal adenopathy.

The patient underwent a CT-guided core biopsy of the spiculated nodule, which was found to be consistent with adenocarcinoma of the lung. It was negative for EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement. She received stereotactic radiosurgery to the left posterior parietal lesion, and after completion of radiation, was started on systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed for adenocarcinoma of the lung. She received 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Repeat imaging with a PET-CT showed interval increase of the mediastinal hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy with new hypermetabolic pretracheal lymph nodes and interval development of multiple liver metastases in the right and left lobes of the liver (Figure 1). She was started on second-line therapy with nivolumab at a dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks. The treatment was complicated initially by new onset grade 2 papular pruritic rash after cycle 2 of therapy. The rash involved the upper and lower extremities, sparing the palms, soles, trunk, abdomen, and the back. It resolved with treatment delay and topical steroids.

Discussion

Among multiple autoimmune complications, dermatologic toxicity is the most common immune-related adverse event, occuring in about 30% to 40% of patients^7,8 and with an average onset of 3-4 weeks after initiating treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.⁹ In addition to vitiligo, the most common type of rash described is a reticular maculopapular rash on the trunk and extremities.¹⁰ Other findings, such as photosensitivity, alopecia, xerosis, and hair color changes, have been reported in smaller numbers. Skin exfoliation, as seen in the present case, has been reported in fewer than 1% of the cases.⁴ Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates extending deep into the dermis are most likely to be seen if the lesions are biopsied. Both the location of the rash in our patient and its relapsing nature are rare and make it more interesting as it presents a diagnostic dilemma for treating physicians. Ear, nose, and throat surgeons are more likely to encounter such a complication with the expanded use of PD-1 and PD-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced head and neck cancers. The differential diagnosis includes localized eczema, psoriatic rash, skin infection, or an autoimmune phenomenon.

The location of the rash was also of concern because there have been reports of autoimmune inner-ear disease related to immunotherapy.¹¹ After the failure of treatment with empiric antibiotics and topical steroids, in addition to the development of a new rash on her abdomen, we concluded that this case might represent an unusual autoimmune skin complication. The resolution of the skin lesions in both locations (the ears and the abdomen) with the oral steroid therapy, supported our suspected diagnosis of autoimmune dermatitis.

It is essential that these complications are detected early and misdiagnosis is avoided because timely treatment with steroids will prevent progression to more severe problems such as Steven-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis,¹² or extension into the inner ear.¹¹This case is part of a growing spectrum of other unusual cases seen with immunotherapy treatment, such as erythema nodosum-like reactions,¹³ bullous dermatitis,¹⁴ and psoriasiform eruptions.¹⁵ It highlights the need for an awareness of expanding dermatologic complications from immunotherapy beyond the reported common manifestations. Established guidelines and algorithms for the management of immune-related dermatologic toxicity are available to assist the physician in treatment (Table 1).¹⁶ Skin biopsy should be considered if the diagnosis remains uncertain, although starting empiric treatment with steroids is a widely acceptable approach. Reassessing the skin rash in 48 hours to 1 week after treatment initiation is crucial because steroid-refractory cases will need additional immunosuppression. Early termination of steroids is associated with higher recurrence rate, therefore tapering steroids over 4 weeks is highly recommended before resuming treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusion

This pattern of autoimmune dermatitis localizing to the ears is rare (<1% of cases of dermatitis). Nevertheless, it raises the awareness for dermatologic complications of immunotherapy beyond the classical reported manifestations. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is essential to avoid serious complications such as Steven-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and potentially damage to the inner ear.
 

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide.¹ Despite advances in the treatment of the disease and development of targeted therapy, the 5-year overall survival in stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer remains poor, ranging from 6% to 10%.² More recently, checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the treatment of lung cancer. Nivolumab was the first program cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor approved for malignant melanoma.³ In July 2015, it was approved as a second-line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.⁴ Since then, the use of nivolumab has extended to other malignancies such as head and neck cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and the list continues to expand. In lung cancer, it demonstrated superior overall survival of 9 months, compared with 6 months with docetaxel.⁴ Other checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab⁵ and atezolizumab⁶ were subsequently developed, and are also used in the treatment of lung cancer.

Serious potential autoimmune complications arise in up to 30% of patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Dermatologic toxicity is the most common immune-related adverse event in these patients. In addition to vitiligo, most common is a reticular maculopapular rash on the trunk and extremities. Other adverse events, such as photosensitivity, alopecia, xerosis, and hair color changes, are reported less frequently.⁷ We report here a case of rash at an unusual location (auricular and periauricular) with skin exfoliation mimicking other common skin conditions such as eczema and psoriasis.
 

Case presentation and summary

A 57-year-old woman with a history of cerebrovascular accident with residual left lower-leg paresis presented for acute onset expressive aphasia in the absence of other constitutional or neurological findings. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a posterior, left parietal lobe lesion of 1.6 cm with intralesional hemorrhage and surrounding edema suggestive of brain metastasis. The patient had a 35 pack-year history of smoking. A staging work-up with computed-tomographic (CT) scans showed a spiculated enhancing nodule in the superior segment of the right lower lobe plus mediastinal adenopathy.

The patient underwent a CT-guided core biopsy of the spiculated nodule, which was found to be consistent with adenocarcinoma of the lung. It was negative for EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement. She received stereotactic radiosurgery to the left posterior parietal lesion, and after completion of radiation, was started on systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed for adenocarcinoma of the lung. She received 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Repeat imaging with a PET-CT showed interval increase of the mediastinal hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy with new hypermetabolic pretracheal lymph nodes and interval development of multiple liver metastases in the right and left lobes of the liver (Figure 1). She was started on second-line therapy with nivolumab at a dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks. The treatment was complicated initially by new onset grade 2 papular pruritic rash after cycle 2 of therapy. The rash involved the upper and lower extremities, sparing the palms, soles, trunk, abdomen, and the back. It resolved with treatment delay and topical steroids.

Discussion

Among multiple autoimmune complications, dermatologic toxicity is the most common immune-related adverse event, occuring in about 30% to 40% of patients^7,8 and with an average onset of 3-4 weeks after initiating treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.⁹ In addition to vitiligo, the most common type of rash described is a reticular maculopapular rash on the trunk and extremities.¹⁰ Other findings, such as photosensitivity, alopecia, xerosis, and hair color changes, have been reported in smaller numbers. Skin exfoliation, as seen in the present case, has been reported in fewer than 1% of the cases.⁴ Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates extending deep into the dermis are most likely to be seen if the lesions are biopsied. Both the location of the rash in our patient and its relapsing nature are rare and make it more interesting as it presents a diagnostic dilemma for treating physicians. Ear, nose, and throat surgeons are more likely to encounter such a complication with the expanded use of PD-1 and PD-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced head and neck cancers. The differential diagnosis includes localized eczema, psoriatic rash, skin infection, or an autoimmune phenomenon.

The location of the rash was also of concern because there have been reports of autoimmune inner-ear disease related to immunotherapy.¹¹ After the failure of treatment with empiric antibiotics and topical steroids, in addition to the development of a new rash on her abdomen, we concluded that this case might represent an unusual autoimmune skin complication. The resolution of the skin lesions in both locations (the ears and the abdomen) with the oral steroid therapy, supported our suspected diagnosis of autoimmune dermatitis.

It is essential that these complications are detected early and misdiagnosis is avoided because timely treatment with steroids will prevent progression to more severe problems such as Steven-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis,¹² or extension into the inner ear.¹¹This case is part of a growing spectrum of other unusual cases seen with immunotherapy treatment, such as erythema nodosum-like reactions,¹³ bullous dermatitis,¹⁴ and psoriasiform eruptions.¹⁵ It highlights the need for an awareness of expanding dermatologic complications from immunotherapy beyond the reported common manifestations. Established guidelines and algorithms for the management of immune-related dermatologic toxicity are available to assist the physician in treatment (Table 1).¹⁶ Skin biopsy should be considered if the diagnosis remains uncertain, although starting empiric treatment with steroids is a widely acceptable approach. Reassessing the skin rash in 48 hours to 1 week after treatment initiation is crucial because steroid-refractory cases will need additional immunosuppression. Early termination of steroids is associated with higher recurrence rate, therefore tapering steroids over 4 weeks is highly recommended before resuming treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusion

This pattern of autoimmune dermatitis localizing to the ears is rare (<1% of cases of dermatitis). Nevertheless, it raises the awareness for dermatologic complications of immunotherapy beyond the classical reported manifestations. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is essential to avoid serious complications such as Steven-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and potentially damage to the inner ear.
 

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide.¹ Despite advances in the treatment of the disease and development of targeted therapy, the 5-year overall survival in stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer remains poor, ranging from 6% to 10%.² More recently, checkpoint inhibitors have had a major impact on the treatment of lung cancer. Nivolumab was the first program cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor approved for malignant melanoma.³ In July 2015, it was approved as a second-line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.⁴ Since then, the use of nivolumab has extended to other malignancies such as head and neck cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and the list continues to expand. In lung cancer, it demonstrated superior overall survival of 9 months, compared with 6 months with docetaxel.⁴ Other checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab⁵ and atezolizumab⁶ were subsequently developed, and are also used in the treatment of lung cancer.

Serious potential autoimmune complications arise in up to 30% of patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Dermatologic toxicity is the most common immune-related adverse event in these patients. In addition to vitiligo, most common is a reticular maculopapular rash on the trunk and extremities. Other adverse events, such as photosensitivity, alopecia, xerosis, and hair color changes, are reported less frequently.⁷ We report here a case of rash at an unusual location (auricular and periauricular) with skin exfoliation mimicking other common skin conditions such as eczema and psoriasis.
 

Case presentation and summary

A 57-year-old woman with a history of cerebrovascular accident with residual left lower-leg paresis presented for acute onset expressive aphasia in the absence of other constitutional or neurological findings. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a posterior, left parietal lobe lesion of 1.6 cm with intralesional hemorrhage and surrounding edema suggestive of brain metastasis. The patient had a 35 pack-year history of smoking. A staging work-up with computed-tomographic (CT) scans showed a spiculated enhancing nodule in the superior segment of the right lower lobe plus mediastinal adenopathy.

The patient underwent a CT-guided core biopsy of the spiculated nodule, which was found to be consistent with adenocarcinoma of the lung. It was negative for EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement. She received stereotactic radiosurgery to the left posterior parietal lesion, and after completion of radiation, was started on systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin plus pemetrexed for adenocarcinoma of the lung. She received 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Repeat imaging with a PET-CT showed interval increase of the mediastinal hypermetabolic lymphadenopathy with new hypermetabolic pretracheal lymph nodes and interval development of multiple liver metastases in the right and left lobes of the liver (Figure 1). She was started on second-line therapy with nivolumab at a dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks. The treatment was complicated initially by new onset grade 2 papular pruritic rash after cycle 2 of therapy. The rash involved the upper and lower extremities, sparing the palms, soles, trunk, abdomen, and the back. It resolved with treatment delay and topical steroids.

Discussion

Among multiple autoimmune complications, dermatologic toxicity is the most common immune-related adverse event, occuring in about 30% to 40% of patients^7,8 and with an average onset of 3-4 weeks after initiating treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.⁹ In addition to vitiligo, the most common type of rash described is a reticular maculopapular rash on the trunk and extremities.¹⁰ Other findings, such as photosensitivity, alopecia, xerosis, and hair color changes, have been reported in smaller numbers. Skin exfoliation, as seen in the present case, has been reported in fewer than 1% of the cases.⁴ Perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates extending deep into the dermis are most likely to be seen if the lesions are biopsied. Both the location of the rash in our patient and its relapsing nature are rare and make it more interesting as it presents a diagnostic dilemma for treating physicians. Ear, nose, and throat surgeons are more likely to encounter such a complication with the expanded use of PD-1 and PD-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced head and neck cancers. The differential diagnosis includes localized eczema, psoriatic rash, skin infection, or an autoimmune phenomenon.

The location of the rash was also of concern because there have been reports of autoimmune inner-ear disease related to immunotherapy.¹¹ After the failure of treatment with empiric antibiotics and topical steroids, in addition to the development of a new rash on her abdomen, we concluded that this case might represent an unusual autoimmune skin complication. The resolution of the skin lesions in both locations (the ears and the abdomen) with the oral steroid therapy, supported our suspected diagnosis of autoimmune dermatitis.

It is essential that these complications are detected early and misdiagnosis is avoided because timely treatment with steroids will prevent progression to more severe problems such as Steven-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis,¹² or extension into the inner ear.¹¹This case is part of a growing spectrum of other unusual cases seen with immunotherapy treatment, such as erythema nodosum-like reactions,¹³ bullous dermatitis,¹⁴ and psoriasiform eruptions.¹⁵ It highlights the need for an awareness of expanding dermatologic complications from immunotherapy beyond the reported common manifestations. Established guidelines and algorithms for the management of immune-related dermatologic toxicity are available to assist the physician in treatment (Table 1).¹⁶ Skin biopsy should be considered if the diagnosis remains uncertain, although starting empiric treatment with steroids is a widely acceptable approach. Reassessing the skin rash in 48 hours to 1 week after treatment initiation is crucial because steroid-refractory cases will need additional immunosuppression. Early termination of steroids is associated with higher recurrence rate, therefore tapering steroids over 4 weeks is highly recommended before resuming treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.

Conclusion

This pattern of autoimmune dermatitis localizing to the ears is rare (<1% of cases of dermatitis). Nevertheless, it raises the awareness for dermatologic complications of immunotherapy beyond the classical reported manifestations. Prompt diagnosis and treatment is essential to avoid serious complications such as Steven-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and potentially damage to the inner ear.
 

Head and neck cancer is among the most prevalent cancers in developing countries.¹ Most of the patients in developing countries present in locally advanced stages, and radical radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is the standard treatment.¹ Radiation therapy is associated with radiation dermatitis, which causes severe symptoms in the patient and can lead to disruption of treatment, diminished rates of disease control rates, and impaired patient quality of life.² The management of advanced radiation dermatitis is difficult and can cause consequential late morbidity to patients.² We report here the rare case of a patient with locally advanced tonsil carcinoma who developed grade 3 radiation dermatitis while receiving radical chemoradiation. The patient’s radiation dermatitis was effectively managed with the use of a silver-containing antimicrobial dressing that yielded remarkable results, so the patient was able to resume and complete radiation therapy.

Case presentation and summary

A 48-year-old man was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the right tonsil, with bilateral neck nodes (Stage T4a N2c M0; The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, 7th edition). In view of the locally advanced status of his disease, the patient was scheduled for radical radiation therapy at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks along with weekly chemotherapy (cisplatin 40 mg/m²). During the course of radiation therapy, the patient was monitored twice a week, and symptomatic care was done for radiation-therapy–induced toxicities.

The patient presented with grade 3 radiation dermatitis after receiving 58 Gy in 29 fractions over 5 weeks (grade 0, no change; grades 3 and 4, severe change). The radiation dermatitis involved the anterior and bilateral neck with moist desquamation of the skin (Figure 1).

Discussion

Head and neck cancer is one of the most common cancers in developing countries.¹ Most patients present with locally advanced disease, so chemoradiation is the standard treatment in these patents. Radiation therapy is associated with acute and chronic toxicities. The common radiation therapy toxicities are directed at skin and mucosa, which leads to radiation dermatitis and radiation mucositis, respectively.² These toxicities are graded as per the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria (Table 2).³

Head and neck cancer is among the most prevalent cancers in developing countries.¹ Most of the patients in developing countries present in locally advanced stages, and radical radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is the standard treatment.¹ Radiation therapy is associated with radiation dermatitis, which causes severe symptoms in the patient and can lead to disruption of treatment, diminished rates of disease control rates, and impaired patient quality of life.² The management of advanced radiation dermatitis is difficult and can cause consequential late morbidity to patients.² We report here the rare case of a patient with locally advanced tonsil carcinoma who developed grade 3 radiation dermatitis while receiving radical chemoradiation. The patient’s radiation dermatitis was effectively managed with the use of a silver-containing antimicrobial dressing that yielded remarkable results, so the patient was able to resume and complete radiation therapy.

Case presentation and summary

A 48-year-old man was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the right tonsil, with bilateral neck nodes (Stage T4a N2c M0; The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, 7th edition). In view of the locally advanced status of his disease, the patient was scheduled for radical radiation therapy at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks along with weekly chemotherapy (cisplatin 40 mg/m²). During the course of radiation therapy, the patient was monitored twice a week, and symptomatic care was done for radiation-therapy–induced toxicities.

The patient presented with grade 3 radiation dermatitis after receiving 58 Gy in 29 fractions over 5 weeks (grade 0, no change; grades 3 and 4, severe change). The radiation dermatitis involved the anterior and bilateral neck with moist desquamation of the skin (Figure 1).

Discussion

Head and neck cancer is one of the most common cancers in developing countries.¹ Most patients present with locally advanced disease, so chemoradiation is the standard treatment in these patents. Radiation therapy is associated with acute and chronic toxicities. The common radiation therapy toxicities are directed at skin and mucosa, which leads to radiation dermatitis and radiation mucositis, respectively.² These toxicities are graded as per the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria (Table 2).³

Head and neck cancer is among the most prevalent cancers in developing countries.¹ Most of the patients in developing countries present in locally advanced stages, and radical radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is the standard treatment.¹ Radiation therapy is associated with radiation dermatitis, which causes severe symptoms in the patient and can lead to disruption of treatment, diminished rates of disease control rates, and impaired patient quality of life.² The management of advanced radiation dermatitis is difficult and can cause consequential late morbidity to patients.² We report here the rare case of a patient with locally advanced tonsil carcinoma who developed grade 3 radiation dermatitis while receiving radical chemoradiation. The patient’s radiation dermatitis was effectively managed with the use of a silver-containing antimicrobial dressing that yielded remarkable results, so the patient was able to resume and complete radiation therapy.

Case presentation and summary

A 48-year-old man was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the right tonsil, with bilateral neck nodes (Stage T4a N2c M0; The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, 7th edition). In view of the locally advanced status of his disease, the patient was scheduled for radical radiation therapy at 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks along with weekly chemotherapy (cisplatin 40 mg/m²). During the course of radiation therapy, the patient was monitored twice a week, and symptomatic care was done for radiation-therapy–induced toxicities.

The patient presented with grade 3 radiation dermatitis after receiving 58 Gy in 29 fractions over 5 weeks (grade 0, no change; grades 3 and 4, severe change). The radiation dermatitis involved the anterior and bilateral neck with moist desquamation of the skin (Figure 1).

Discussion

Head and neck cancer is one of the most common cancers in developing countries.¹ Most patients present with locally advanced disease, so chemoradiation is the standard treatment in these patents. Radiation therapy is associated with acute and chronic toxicities. The common radiation therapy toxicities are directed at skin and mucosa, which leads to radiation dermatitis and radiation mucositis, respectively.² These toxicities are graded as per the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria (Table 2).³

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in women worldwide, with more than 1 million new cases diagnosed annually.¹ Prognosis for the disease has improved significantly, but 25% to 60% of women living with breast cancer experience some level of pain ranging from mild to severe, the nature of which can evolve from acute to chronic.² Pre-, intra-, and post-treatment risk factors have been found to correlate with the development of acute and chronic pain and include young age, type of breast surgery (lumpectomy or total mastectomy), axillary node dissection, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy.^3-5 Chemotherapy, particularly anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens, has also been shown to induce pain, arthralgia, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy during treatment.⁶ In particular, postradiation pain may result from subcutaneous fibrosis with fixation to underlying musculature and the development of fibrous flaps in the internal axilla.⁷ These tissue changes are commonly subclinical, occurring 4 to 12 months postradiation,⁸ and can progress undetected until pain and upper-limb disability develop.

The presence of persistent pain has a considerable impact on the quality of life in survivors of breast cancer: psychological distress is prevalent (anxiety, depression, worry, fear), the performance of daily activities is diminished (eg, bathing, dressing, preparing meals, shopping), and economic independence is compromised by the inability to work or reduced employment and income. These factors directly and indirectly contribute to an increase in the use of health care services.^9,10

The management of pain is often characterized by pharmacologic-related treatment, such as the use of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and nonpharmacologic-related treatment, such as exercise. Empirical evidence has shown that rehabilitative exercise programs, which commonly include a combination of resistance training and aerobic exercises, can effectively reduce pain in breast cancer survivors.^10-12 Women living with breast cancer who are directed to rehabilitative exercise programs experience an improvement not only in pain levels but also in their ability to engage in activities of daily living, in their psychological health, and in their overall quality of life.^13-15 However, despite evidence to support exercise programs to reduce pain related to breast cancer treatment, residual pain and upper-limb discomfort are common complaints in breast cancer survivors, and there is little focus on the duration of effectiveness of such programs for reducing pain after treatment for breast cancer. The objective of this study was to determine if an exercise program initiated postradiation would improve long-term pain levels in a carefully selected population of young women who were living with breast cancer and had no history of shoulder pathology or significant treatment complications.
 

Methods

Design

We used a pilot randomized control trial to compare the long-term effectiveness of a 12-week postradiation exercise program versus standard care on residual pain levels in young women (aged 18-45 years) living with breast cancer. The program was initiated 3 to 4 weeks postradiation to allow for acute inflammatory reactions to subside. Pain severity and interference were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), a tool for assessing cancer pain.^16,17 Pain levels for isolated shoulder movements were also recorded on examination by a physical therapist. All measures were collected at 6 time points (T1-T6): postsurgery and preradiation (T1, baseline), postradiation and preintervention (T2), and 4 points during an 18-month period postradiation (T3-T6 at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postradiation).
 

Sample

Young women living with breast cancer who met our eligibility criteria were identified from 2 clinics at the Jewish General Hospital – the Segal Cancer Center and the Department of Radiation Oncology in Montréal, Québec, Canada. Inclusion criteria included women with a diagnosis of stage I to stage III breast cancer, who were 18 to 45 years old, were scheduled for postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1 (normal ambulatory function, minimal symptoms), and who consented to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria included women with a metastatic (stage IV) diagnosis; significant musculoskeletal, cardiac, pulmonary, or metabolic comorbidities that would not allow for participation in physical activity; a previous breast cancer diagnosis with treatment to the ipsilateral or contralateral sides; postsurgical lymphedema; postsurgical capsulitis, tendonitis, or other shoulder inflammatory complications; and any contraindication to exercise. The recruitment goal was outlined as 50 patients per group; however, a protracted accrual time because of the stringent study criteria yielded a sample of 29 and 30 patients for the intervention and control groups, respectively, which was sufficient for significant testing of differences between the 2 study groups.¹⁸
 

Variables and measures

Clinical characteristics. We used standardized questions and chart review to document the participants’ clinical characteristics and to capture information on the following: the stage and subtype of breast cancer, hormonal and human epidermal growth factor receptors (HER2) (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status), extent of surgery (lumpectomy or total mastectomy), and other modalities of treatment (eg, chemotherapy, radiation therapy).

Pain assessment. The BPI-SF was used to assess participants’ cancer-related pain. Pain severity ranged from 0 (no pain), 1 to 4 (mild pain), 5 to 6 (moderate pain), to 7 to 10 (severe pain).^18,19 The questionnaire also identifies the pain interference in daily activities using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes) in the following 7 domains or subscales: General Activity, Walking, Mood, Sleep, Work, Relations with Others, and Enjoyment of Life.¹⁶ For the purpose of this study, mean scores were tabulated using both pain intensity and interference scales.

Another important component of the BPI-SF instructs participants to localize pain by means of a body diagram. For purpose of analysis, 3 pain regions were established: shoulder girdle/chest wall on the affected side; neck and other upper extremity, including hand(s), forearm(s), wrist(s), and finger(s); and other regions, including abdominal discomfort, leg(s), hip(s), knee(s), ankle(s), lower back, and feet. In addition, pain levels on movement (Yes/No) were recorded for isolated shoulder flexion, abduction, and horizontal abduction (sitting and standing). The measurements were completed by a single physical therapist throughout the course of the study to minimize variance.

Procedure

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Jewish General Hospital. Recruitment occurred from 2011 through 2015. The research was in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation. Eligible women were recruited by the research coordinator who described the purpose, risks, and benefits of the study; advised on confidentiality, data collection, and intervention allocation procedures; and highlighted voluntary participation. The research coordinator addressed any concerns on the part of the participants before obtaining their written informed consent. Random allocation to the intervention and control groups was established using a web-based randomization plan generator (www.randomization.com). A single individual was responsible for the randomization process, and treatment assignments were revealed after each participant’s name had been entered. A physical therapist performed 6 sequential evaluations (T1-T6) at the time of participants’ medical follow-up appointments.

Intervention

The 12-week exercise intervention started 3 weeks postradiation and was composed of an initial 6-week program of low-level cardiovascular and resistance exercises that progressed to a set of more advanced exercises for the remaining 6 weeks. Participants were instructed to warm up for at least 10 minutes with a cardiovascular exercise of their choice (eg, a recumbent cross trainer, walking, or stairs) before doing a combined strength, endurance, and stretching exercise program for the upper body.²⁰ The final portion of the exercise intervention included a period of light cool-down. Weight training resistance levels were based on a maximum 8 to 10 repetitions for strength and a maximum of 20 repetitions for endurance training exercises, which progressed gradually over the course of the 12-week exercise program to ensure participant safety.^21,22 Participants in the intervention group were supervised at least once a week by an exercise physiologist at a center for oncology patients (Hope & Cope Wellness Centre), and patients were encouraged to perform the program at home 2 to 3 times a week. Those who were not able to exercise consistently at the center were provided with equipment and instructed on how to do the program safely at home.

By comparison, the control group received standard care, which included advice on the benefits of an active lifestyle, including exercise, but without a specific intervention. Participants were not restricted in their physical activity and/or sport participation levels, and their weekly activity levels were calculated using the Metabolic Equivalent of Task and recorded at each of the 6 time points.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine participant characteristics. The quantitative data collected through the BPI-SF measures were analyzed with JMP software (version 11.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Continuous variables were tested for statistical significance (P ≤ .05) through the chi-square (categorical), analysis of variance, and nonparametric Wilcoxon tests. The analyses did not include missing data.

Results

A total of 59 young women were randomized into the intervention (n = 29) and control (n = 30) groups. Of those, 2 participants dropped out of the study because of family and time constraints, and 3 participants died, 2 from the control and 1 from the intervention group, after subsequently developing metastatic disease. Baseline data including comparative tumor characteristics, surgical interventions, and treatment interventions have been published in relation to other elements of this study.^23,24 The participants had a mean age of 39.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 5.0). More than half of them had an invasive ductal carcinoma (69.5%) and were estrogen positive (78.0%), progesterone positive (74.6%), or HER2 positive (20.3%), whereas 10.2% were triple negative. Most of the participants had undergone breast-sparing procedures (86.4% lumpectomy), and 18.6% had a total mastectomy. By random chance, the intervention group had higher rates of total mastectomy (24.4% and 13.3%, respectively) and surgical reconstruction (12.2% and 6.7%, respectively) compared with the control group. Most of the women (71.2%) received chemotherapy, and all received radiation therapy. In the intervention group, 37.2% received radiation therapy localized to the axilla, and 88% received a boost of radiation to the surgical bed. Self-reported exercise diaries were returned by 15 of the 29 intervention participants, and training frequencies among them varied significantly (1-6 times a week).

The findings showed that there was little variance between the intervention and control groups in BPI-SF severity scores from T1 to T6, so the means and SDs of the BPI-SF scores were grouped at 6 time points (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference between baseline measures at T1 (1.68; SD, 1.17) and measures at 18 months postintervention (T6: 1.46; SD, 1.37). At baseline, 87.7% of the women reported no pain (31.5%) or mild levels of pain (55.6%), and 13% reported moderate or severe pain. Over the duration of the study from T1 to T6, these primarily low levels of pain (BPI-SF, 0-4) remained consistent with a favorable shift toward having no pain (T1: 31.5%; T6: 24.4%). By 18 months postintervention, 95.7% of women reported no or mild pain, with 4.9% reporting moderate pain.

Discussion

Previous studies have hypothesized that younger age (18-39 years), adjuvant radiotherapy, and axillary node dissection are risk factors for chronic pain in breast cancer survivors.^22,25 Persistent pain is prevalent in 12% to 51% of breast cancer survivors, with up to one-third experiencing some pain more than 5 years after treatment,^26,27 and our study outcomes concur with those findings. In our study, pain, as measured by the BPI-SF, was found to persist for most participants (75.6%) after the 18-month follow-up. The results of our trial showed that a 12-week exercise intervention administered postsurgery and postradiation had no statistically significant effect on long-term (18 months) pain severity and its interference in daily life. It is worth noting that body regions that had not been directly related to either surgical or radiation treatment for breast cancer were commonly identified as areas of pain but were not specifically targeted by our intervention. However, focusing on pain severity (BPI-SF), our findings suggest that the benefits of targeted upper-extremity exercise on pain in the intermediate time course of follow-up (T3, T4, and T5) was notable compared with the control group, which received standard care. The apparent recurrence of pain at 18 months in both groups was not anticipated and needs to be further investigated.

More specific objective assessments of pain on active shoulder movement identified distinct patterns of pain that could not be isolated using the BPI-SF alone. The incidence and localization of pain on movement differed between the population of women who received a specific exercise intervention and those who received standard care (Figure 2). Patterns of pain over time fluctuated in the control group, whereas the intervention group reported a linear decrease in pain. Residual pain on shoulder movement remained apparent in both groups at 18-months postradiation, but that finding was not reflected in the BPI-SF results. The literature supports our findings on persistent pain among breast cancer survivors,^3,7,8,28-30 and in our study of young women carefully screened and excluded for pre-existent shoulder conditions or comorbid medical conditions, recurrent articular pain was nonetheless prevalent. It seems that unidentified or multiple factors may be part of the etiology of pain in this young adult cohort.

Although the BPI-SF is a generic measurement tool commonly used to assess and measure cancer patients’ pain levels, the lack of variance in our BPI-SF severity and interference outcomes over time (T1-T6) (Table 1, Table 2), the variety of “other” unrelated regions (Figure 1) identified by the BPI-SF, and the contrast in our findings on specific physical examination emphasize the potential limitations of this clinical tool.

Limitations

Recruitment of young adult women was difficult because of our stringent inclusion criteria, the long-term follow-up, and the relatively small population of breast cancer patients in this age demographic. Therefore, the duration of the recruitment phase, despite our having access to a specialized young adult and adolescent clinic in our institute, greatly surpassed the expectations we had when we designed the study. In addition, there remains an inherent bias in participants who accept participation in a study that includes exercise interventions. Potential participants who exercise regularly or have a positive inclination toward doing exercise are more likely to participate. Despite the prescription of a targeted 12-week upper-limb intervention in this study, the general activity levels of both groups may have had an impact on the significance of this study. In addition, the low adherence to the use of self-reported logs failed to capture the true compliance rates of our participants because their lack of tracking does not indicate failure to comply with the program. The use of weekly or biweekly telephone calls to monitor compliance rates of activity more vigilantly may be used in future studies.

Conclusions

Advances in clinical management of breast cancer have improved survival outcomes, and morbidity over recent years, yet symptoms such as pain remain prevalent in this population. The results of this study showed that a targeted, 12-week upper-limb exercise intervention postradiation transiently improved levels of shoulder pain without a concomitant impact on chronic pain or any positive influence on activities of daily living 18 months posttreatment. Furthermore, future studies should use a variety of measurement tools to evaluate trunk and upper-limb pain in women with breast cancer and investigate the optimal timing of postradiation exercise interventions.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hope & Cope, the CURE foundation, and the Jewish General Hospital Foundation/Weekend to End Breast Cancer for providing the financial resources needed to sustain this research study. They also thank the McGill Adolescent and Young Adult program for its continued support. Previous oral presentations of research Muanza TM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a progressive exercise program for young women with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(3):s35-s36.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in women worldwide, with more than 1 million new cases diagnosed annually.¹ Prognosis for the disease has improved significantly, but 25% to 60% of women living with breast cancer experience some level of pain ranging from mild to severe, the nature of which can evolve from acute to chronic.² Pre-, intra-, and post-treatment risk factors have been found to correlate with the development of acute and chronic pain and include young age, type of breast surgery (lumpectomy or total mastectomy), axillary node dissection, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy.^3-5 Chemotherapy, particularly anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens, has also been shown to induce pain, arthralgia, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy during treatment.⁶ In particular, postradiation pain may result from subcutaneous fibrosis with fixation to underlying musculature and the development of fibrous flaps in the internal axilla.⁷ These tissue changes are commonly subclinical, occurring 4 to 12 months postradiation,⁸ and can progress undetected until pain and upper-limb disability develop.

The presence of persistent pain has a considerable impact on the quality of life in survivors of breast cancer: psychological distress is prevalent (anxiety, depression, worry, fear), the performance of daily activities is diminished (eg, bathing, dressing, preparing meals, shopping), and economic independence is compromised by the inability to work or reduced employment and income. These factors directly and indirectly contribute to an increase in the use of health care services.^9,10

The management of pain is often characterized by pharmacologic-related treatment, such as the use of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and nonpharmacologic-related treatment, such as exercise. Empirical evidence has shown that rehabilitative exercise programs, which commonly include a combination of resistance training and aerobic exercises, can effectively reduce pain in breast cancer survivors.^10-12 Women living with breast cancer who are directed to rehabilitative exercise programs experience an improvement not only in pain levels but also in their ability to engage in activities of daily living, in their psychological health, and in their overall quality of life.^13-15 However, despite evidence to support exercise programs to reduce pain related to breast cancer treatment, residual pain and upper-limb discomfort are common complaints in breast cancer survivors, and there is little focus on the duration of effectiveness of such programs for reducing pain after treatment for breast cancer. The objective of this study was to determine if an exercise program initiated postradiation would improve long-term pain levels in a carefully selected population of young women who were living with breast cancer and had no history of shoulder pathology or significant treatment complications.
 

Methods

Design

We used a pilot randomized control trial to compare the long-term effectiveness of a 12-week postradiation exercise program versus standard care on residual pain levels in young women (aged 18-45 years) living with breast cancer. The program was initiated 3 to 4 weeks postradiation to allow for acute inflammatory reactions to subside. Pain severity and interference were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), a tool for assessing cancer pain.^16,17 Pain levels for isolated shoulder movements were also recorded on examination by a physical therapist. All measures were collected at 6 time points (T1-T6): postsurgery and preradiation (T1, baseline), postradiation and preintervention (T2), and 4 points during an 18-month period postradiation (T3-T6 at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postradiation).
 

Sample

Young women living with breast cancer who met our eligibility criteria were identified from 2 clinics at the Jewish General Hospital – the Segal Cancer Center and the Department of Radiation Oncology in Montréal, Québec, Canada. Inclusion criteria included women with a diagnosis of stage I to stage III breast cancer, who were 18 to 45 years old, were scheduled for postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1 (normal ambulatory function, minimal symptoms), and who consented to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria included women with a metastatic (stage IV) diagnosis; significant musculoskeletal, cardiac, pulmonary, or metabolic comorbidities that would not allow for participation in physical activity; a previous breast cancer diagnosis with treatment to the ipsilateral or contralateral sides; postsurgical lymphedema; postsurgical capsulitis, tendonitis, or other shoulder inflammatory complications; and any contraindication to exercise. The recruitment goal was outlined as 50 patients per group; however, a protracted accrual time because of the stringent study criteria yielded a sample of 29 and 30 patients for the intervention and control groups, respectively, which was sufficient for significant testing of differences between the 2 study groups.¹⁸
 

Variables and measures

Clinical characteristics. We used standardized questions and chart review to document the participants’ clinical characteristics and to capture information on the following: the stage and subtype of breast cancer, hormonal and human epidermal growth factor receptors (HER2) (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status), extent of surgery (lumpectomy or total mastectomy), and other modalities of treatment (eg, chemotherapy, radiation therapy).

Pain assessment. The BPI-SF was used to assess participants’ cancer-related pain. Pain severity ranged from 0 (no pain), 1 to 4 (mild pain), 5 to 6 (moderate pain), to 7 to 10 (severe pain).^18,19 The questionnaire also identifies the pain interference in daily activities using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes) in the following 7 domains or subscales: General Activity, Walking, Mood, Sleep, Work, Relations with Others, and Enjoyment of Life.¹⁶ For the purpose of this study, mean scores were tabulated using both pain intensity and interference scales.

Another important component of the BPI-SF instructs participants to localize pain by means of a body diagram. For purpose of analysis, 3 pain regions were established: shoulder girdle/chest wall on the affected side; neck and other upper extremity, including hand(s), forearm(s), wrist(s), and finger(s); and other regions, including abdominal discomfort, leg(s), hip(s), knee(s), ankle(s), lower back, and feet. In addition, pain levels on movement (Yes/No) were recorded for isolated shoulder flexion, abduction, and horizontal abduction (sitting and standing). The measurements were completed by a single physical therapist throughout the course of the study to minimize variance.

Procedure

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Jewish General Hospital. Recruitment occurred from 2011 through 2015. The research was in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation. Eligible women were recruited by the research coordinator who described the purpose, risks, and benefits of the study; advised on confidentiality, data collection, and intervention allocation procedures; and highlighted voluntary participation. The research coordinator addressed any concerns on the part of the participants before obtaining their written informed consent. Random allocation to the intervention and control groups was established using a web-based randomization plan generator (www.randomization.com). A single individual was responsible for the randomization process, and treatment assignments were revealed after each participant’s name had been entered. A physical therapist performed 6 sequential evaluations (T1-T6) at the time of participants’ medical follow-up appointments.

Intervention

The 12-week exercise intervention started 3 weeks postradiation and was composed of an initial 6-week program of low-level cardiovascular and resistance exercises that progressed to a set of more advanced exercises for the remaining 6 weeks. Participants were instructed to warm up for at least 10 minutes with a cardiovascular exercise of their choice (eg, a recumbent cross trainer, walking, or stairs) before doing a combined strength, endurance, and stretching exercise program for the upper body.²⁰ The final portion of the exercise intervention included a period of light cool-down. Weight training resistance levels were based on a maximum 8 to 10 repetitions for strength and a maximum of 20 repetitions for endurance training exercises, which progressed gradually over the course of the 12-week exercise program to ensure participant safety.^21,22 Participants in the intervention group were supervised at least once a week by an exercise physiologist at a center for oncology patients (Hope & Cope Wellness Centre), and patients were encouraged to perform the program at home 2 to 3 times a week. Those who were not able to exercise consistently at the center were provided with equipment and instructed on how to do the program safely at home.

By comparison, the control group received standard care, which included advice on the benefits of an active lifestyle, including exercise, but without a specific intervention. Participants were not restricted in their physical activity and/or sport participation levels, and their weekly activity levels were calculated using the Metabolic Equivalent of Task and recorded at each of the 6 time points.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine participant characteristics. The quantitative data collected through the BPI-SF measures were analyzed with JMP software (version 11.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Continuous variables were tested for statistical significance (P ≤ .05) through the chi-square (categorical), analysis of variance, and nonparametric Wilcoxon tests. The analyses did not include missing data.

Results

A total of 59 young women were randomized into the intervention (n = 29) and control (n = 30) groups. Of those, 2 participants dropped out of the study because of family and time constraints, and 3 participants died, 2 from the control and 1 from the intervention group, after subsequently developing metastatic disease. Baseline data including comparative tumor characteristics, surgical interventions, and treatment interventions have been published in relation to other elements of this study.^23,24 The participants had a mean age of 39.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 5.0). More than half of them had an invasive ductal carcinoma (69.5%) and were estrogen positive (78.0%), progesterone positive (74.6%), or HER2 positive (20.3%), whereas 10.2% were triple negative. Most of the participants had undergone breast-sparing procedures (86.4% lumpectomy), and 18.6% had a total mastectomy. By random chance, the intervention group had higher rates of total mastectomy (24.4% and 13.3%, respectively) and surgical reconstruction (12.2% and 6.7%, respectively) compared with the control group. Most of the women (71.2%) received chemotherapy, and all received radiation therapy. In the intervention group, 37.2% received radiation therapy localized to the axilla, and 88% received a boost of radiation to the surgical bed. Self-reported exercise diaries were returned by 15 of the 29 intervention participants, and training frequencies among them varied significantly (1-6 times a week).

The findings showed that there was little variance between the intervention and control groups in BPI-SF severity scores from T1 to T6, so the means and SDs of the BPI-SF scores were grouped at 6 time points (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference between baseline measures at T1 (1.68; SD, 1.17) and measures at 18 months postintervention (T6: 1.46; SD, 1.37). At baseline, 87.7% of the women reported no pain (31.5%) or mild levels of pain (55.6%), and 13% reported moderate or severe pain. Over the duration of the study from T1 to T6, these primarily low levels of pain (BPI-SF, 0-4) remained consistent with a favorable shift toward having no pain (T1: 31.5%; T6: 24.4%). By 18 months postintervention, 95.7% of women reported no or mild pain, with 4.9% reporting moderate pain.

Discussion

Previous studies have hypothesized that younger age (18-39 years), adjuvant radiotherapy, and axillary node dissection are risk factors for chronic pain in breast cancer survivors.^22,25 Persistent pain is prevalent in 12% to 51% of breast cancer survivors, with up to one-third experiencing some pain more than 5 years after treatment,^26,27 and our study outcomes concur with those findings. In our study, pain, as measured by the BPI-SF, was found to persist for most participants (75.6%) after the 18-month follow-up. The results of our trial showed that a 12-week exercise intervention administered postsurgery and postradiation had no statistically significant effect on long-term (18 months) pain severity and its interference in daily life. It is worth noting that body regions that had not been directly related to either surgical or radiation treatment for breast cancer were commonly identified as areas of pain but were not specifically targeted by our intervention. However, focusing on pain severity (BPI-SF), our findings suggest that the benefits of targeted upper-extremity exercise on pain in the intermediate time course of follow-up (T3, T4, and T5) was notable compared with the control group, which received standard care. The apparent recurrence of pain at 18 months in both groups was not anticipated and needs to be further investigated.

More specific objective assessments of pain on active shoulder movement identified distinct patterns of pain that could not be isolated using the BPI-SF alone. The incidence and localization of pain on movement differed between the population of women who received a specific exercise intervention and those who received standard care (Figure 2). Patterns of pain over time fluctuated in the control group, whereas the intervention group reported a linear decrease in pain. Residual pain on shoulder movement remained apparent in both groups at 18-months postradiation, but that finding was not reflected in the BPI-SF results. The literature supports our findings on persistent pain among breast cancer survivors,^3,7,8,28-30 and in our study of young women carefully screened and excluded for pre-existent shoulder conditions or comorbid medical conditions, recurrent articular pain was nonetheless prevalent. It seems that unidentified or multiple factors may be part of the etiology of pain in this young adult cohort.

Although the BPI-SF is a generic measurement tool commonly used to assess and measure cancer patients’ pain levels, the lack of variance in our BPI-SF severity and interference outcomes over time (T1-T6) (Table 1, Table 2), the variety of “other” unrelated regions (Figure 1) identified by the BPI-SF, and the contrast in our findings on specific physical examination emphasize the potential limitations of this clinical tool.

Limitations

Recruitment of young adult women was difficult because of our stringent inclusion criteria, the long-term follow-up, and the relatively small population of breast cancer patients in this age demographic. Therefore, the duration of the recruitment phase, despite our having access to a specialized young adult and adolescent clinic in our institute, greatly surpassed the expectations we had when we designed the study. In addition, there remains an inherent bias in participants who accept participation in a study that includes exercise interventions. Potential participants who exercise regularly or have a positive inclination toward doing exercise are more likely to participate. Despite the prescription of a targeted 12-week upper-limb intervention in this study, the general activity levels of both groups may have had an impact on the significance of this study. In addition, the low adherence to the use of self-reported logs failed to capture the true compliance rates of our participants because their lack of tracking does not indicate failure to comply with the program. The use of weekly or biweekly telephone calls to monitor compliance rates of activity more vigilantly may be used in future studies.

Conclusions

Advances in clinical management of breast cancer have improved survival outcomes, and morbidity over recent years, yet symptoms such as pain remain prevalent in this population. The results of this study showed that a targeted, 12-week upper-limb exercise intervention postradiation transiently improved levels of shoulder pain without a concomitant impact on chronic pain or any positive influence on activities of daily living 18 months posttreatment. Furthermore, future studies should use a variety of measurement tools to evaluate trunk and upper-limb pain in women with breast cancer and investigate the optimal timing of postradiation exercise interventions.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hope & Cope, the CURE foundation, and the Jewish General Hospital Foundation/Weekend to End Breast Cancer for providing the financial resources needed to sustain this research study. They also thank the McGill Adolescent and Young Adult program for its continued support. Previous oral presentations of research Muanza TM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a progressive exercise program for young women with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(3):s35-s36.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in women worldwide, with more than 1 million new cases diagnosed annually.¹ Prognosis for the disease has improved significantly, but 25% to 60% of women living with breast cancer experience some level of pain ranging from mild to severe, the nature of which can evolve from acute to chronic.² Pre-, intra-, and post-treatment risk factors have been found to correlate with the development of acute and chronic pain and include young age, type of breast surgery (lumpectomy or total mastectomy), axillary node dissection, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy.^3-5 Chemotherapy, particularly anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens, has also been shown to induce pain, arthralgia, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy during treatment.⁶ In particular, postradiation pain may result from subcutaneous fibrosis with fixation to underlying musculature and the development of fibrous flaps in the internal axilla.⁷ These tissue changes are commonly subclinical, occurring 4 to 12 months postradiation,⁸ and can progress undetected until pain and upper-limb disability develop.

The presence of persistent pain has a considerable impact on the quality of life in survivors of breast cancer: psychological distress is prevalent (anxiety, depression, worry, fear), the performance of daily activities is diminished (eg, bathing, dressing, preparing meals, shopping), and economic independence is compromised by the inability to work or reduced employment and income. These factors directly and indirectly contribute to an increase in the use of health care services.^9,10

The management of pain is often characterized by pharmacologic-related treatment, such as the use of opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and nonpharmacologic-related treatment, such as exercise. Empirical evidence has shown that rehabilitative exercise programs, which commonly include a combination of resistance training and aerobic exercises, can effectively reduce pain in breast cancer survivors.^10-12 Women living with breast cancer who are directed to rehabilitative exercise programs experience an improvement not only in pain levels but also in their ability to engage in activities of daily living, in their psychological health, and in their overall quality of life.^13-15 However, despite evidence to support exercise programs to reduce pain related to breast cancer treatment, residual pain and upper-limb discomfort are common complaints in breast cancer survivors, and there is little focus on the duration of effectiveness of such programs for reducing pain after treatment for breast cancer. The objective of this study was to determine if an exercise program initiated postradiation would improve long-term pain levels in a carefully selected population of young women who were living with breast cancer and had no history of shoulder pathology or significant treatment complications.
 

Methods

Design

We used a pilot randomized control trial to compare the long-term effectiveness of a 12-week postradiation exercise program versus standard care on residual pain levels in young women (aged 18-45 years) living with breast cancer. The program was initiated 3 to 4 weeks postradiation to allow for acute inflammatory reactions to subside. Pain severity and interference were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), a tool for assessing cancer pain.^16,17 Pain levels for isolated shoulder movements were also recorded on examination by a physical therapist. All measures were collected at 6 time points (T1-T6): postsurgery and preradiation (T1, baseline), postradiation and preintervention (T2), and 4 points during an 18-month period postradiation (T3-T6 at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months postradiation).
 

Sample

Young women living with breast cancer who met our eligibility criteria were identified from 2 clinics at the Jewish General Hospital – the Segal Cancer Center and the Department of Radiation Oncology in Montréal, Québec, Canada. Inclusion criteria included women with a diagnosis of stage I to stage III breast cancer, who were 18 to 45 years old, were scheduled for postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1 (normal ambulatory function, minimal symptoms), and who consented to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria included women with a metastatic (stage IV) diagnosis; significant musculoskeletal, cardiac, pulmonary, or metabolic comorbidities that would not allow for participation in physical activity; a previous breast cancer diagnosis with treatment to the ipsilateral or contralateral sides; postsurgical lymphedema; postsurgical capsulitis, tendonitis, or other shoulder inflammatory complications; and any contraindication to exercise. The recruitment goal was outlined as 50 patients per group; however, a protracted accrual time because of the stringent study criteria yielded a sample of 29 and 30 patients for the intervention and control groups, respectively, which was sufficient for significant testing of differences between the 2 study groups.¹⁸
 

Variables and measures

Clinical characteristics. We used standardized questions and chart review to document the participants’ clinical characteristics and to capture information on the following: the stage and subtype of breast cancer, hormonal and human epidermal growth factor receptors (HER2) (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 status), extent of surgery (lumpectomy or total mastectomy), and other modalities of treatment (eg, chemotherapy, radiation therapy).

Pain assessment. The BPI-SF was used to assess participants’ cancer-related pain. Pain severity ranged from 0 (no pain), 1 to 4 (mild pain), 5 to 6 (moderate pain), to 7 to 10 (severe pain).^18,19 The questionnaire also identifies the pain interference in daily activities using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (Does not interfere) to 10 (Completely interferes) in the following 7 domains or subscales: General Activity, Walking, Mood, Sleep, Work, Relations with Others, and Enjoyment of Life.¹⁶ For the purpose of this study, mean scores were tabulated using both pain intensity and interference scales.

Another important component of the BPI-SF instructs participants to localize pain by means of a body diagram. For purpose of analysis, 3 pain regions were established: shoulder girdle/chest wall on the affected side; neck and other upper extremity, including hand(s), forearm(s), wrist(s), and finger(s); and other regions, including abdominal discomfort, leg(s), hip(s), knee(s), ankle(s), lower back, and feet. In addition, pain levels on movement (Yes/No) were recorded for isolated shoulder flexion, abduction, and horizontal abduction (sitting and standing). The measurements were completed by a single physical therapist throughout the course of the study to minimize variance.

Procedure

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Jewish General Hospital. Recruitment occurred from 2011 through 2015. The research was in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation. Eligible women were recruited by the research coordinator who described the purpose, risks, and benefits of the study; advised on confidentiality, data collection, and intervention allocation procedures; and highlighted voluntary participation. The research coordinator addressed any concerns on the part of the participants before obtaining their written informed consent. Random allocation to the intervention and control groups was established using a web-based randomization plan generator (www.randomization.com). A single individual was responsible for the randomization process, and treatment assignments were revealed after each participant’s name had been entered. A physical therapist performed 6 sequential evaluations (T1-T6) at the time of participants’ medical follow-up appointments.

Intervention

The 12-week exercise intervention started 3 weeks postradiation and was composed of an initial 6-week program of low-level cardiovascular and resistance exercises that progressed to a set of more advanced exercises for the remaining 6 weeks. Participants were instructed to warm up for at least 10 minutes with a cardiovascular exercise of their choice (eg, a recumbent cross trainer, walking, or stairs) before doing a combined strength, endurance, and stretching exercise program for the upper body.²⁰ The final portion of the exercise intervention included a period of light cool-down. Weight training resistance levels were based on a maximum 8 to 10 repetitions for strength and a maximum of 20 repetitions for endurance training exercises, which progressed gradually over the course of the 12-week exercise program to ensure participant safety.^21,22 Participants in the intervention group were supervised at least once a week by an exercise physiologist at a center for oncology patients (Hope & Cope Wellness Centre), and patients were encouraged to perform the program at home 2 to 3 times a week. Those who were not able to exercise consistently at the center were provided with equipment and instructed on how to do the program safely at home.

By comparison, the control group received standard care, which included advice on the benefits of an active lifestyle, including exercise, but without a specific intervention. Participants were not restricted in their physical activity and/or sport participation levels, and their weekly activity levels were calculated using the Metabolic Equivalent of Task and recorded at each of the 6 time points.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine participant characteristics. The quantitative data collected through the BPI-SF measures were analyzed with JMP software (version 11.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Continuous variables were tested for statistical significance (P ≤ .05) through the chi-square (categorical), analysis of variance, and nonparametric Wilcoxon tests. The analyses did not include missing data.

Results

A total of 59 young women were randomized into the intervention (n = 29) and control (n = 30) groups. Of those, 2 participants dropped out of the study because of family and time constraints, and 3 participants died, 2 from the control and 1 from the intervention group, after subsequently developing metastatic disease. Baseline data including comparative tumor characteristics, surgical interventions, and treatment interventions have been published in relation to other elements of this study.^23,24 The participants had a mean age of 39.2 years (standard deviation [SD], 5.0). More than half of them had an invasive ductal carcinoma (69.5%) and were estrogen positive (78.0%), progesterone positive (74.6%), or HER2 positive (20.3%), whereas 10.2% were triple negative. Most of the participants had undergone breast-sparing procedures (86.4% lumpectomy), and 18.6% had a total mastectomy. By random chance, the intervention group had higher rates of total mastectomy (24.4% and 13.3%, respectively) and surgical reconstruction (12.2% and 6.7%, respectively) compared with the control group. Most of the women (71.2%) received chemotherapy, and all received radiation therapy. In the intervention group, 37.2% received radiation therapy localized to the axilla, and 88% received a boost of radiation to the surgical bed. Self-reported exercise diaries were returned by 15 of the 29 intervention participants, and training frequencies among them varied significantly (1-6 times a week).

The findings showed that there was little variance between the intervention and control groups in BPI-SF severity scores from T1 to T6, so the means and SDs of the BPI-SF scores were grouped at 6 time points (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference between baseline measures at T1 (1.68; SD, 1.17) and measures at 18 months postintervention (T6: 1.46; SD, 1.37). At baseline, 87.7% of the women reported no pain (31.5%) or mild levels of pain (55.6%), and 13% reported moderate or severe pain. Over the duration of the study from T1 to T6, these primarily low levels of pain (BPI-SF, 0-4) remained consistent with a favorable shift toward having no pain (T1: 31.5%; T6: 24.4%). By 18 months postintervention, 95.7% of women reported no or mild pain, with 4.9% reporting moderate pain.

Discussion

Previous studies have hypothesized that younger age (18-39 years), adjuvant radiotherapy, and axillary node dissection are risk factors for chronic pain in breast cancer survivors.^22,25 Persistent pain is prevalent in 12% to 51% of breast cancer survivors, with up to one-third experiencing some pain more than 5 years after treatment,^26,27 and our study outcomes concur with those findings. In our study, pain, as measured by the BPI-SF, was found to persist for most participants (75.6%) after the 18-month follow-up. The results of our trial showed that a 12-week exercise intervention administered postsurgery and postradiation had no statistically significant effect on long-term (18 months) pain severity and its interference in daily life. It is worth noting that body regions that had not been directly related to either surgical or radiation treatment for breast cancer were commonly identified as areas of pain but were not specifically targeted by our intervention. However, focusing on pain severity (BPI-SF), our findings suggest that the benefits of targeted upper-extremity exercise on pain in the intermediate time course of follow-up (T3, T4, and T5) was notable compared with the control group, which received standard care. The apparent recurrence of pain at 18 months in both groups was not anticipated and needs to be further investigated.

More specific objective assessments of pain on active shoulder movement identified distinct patterns of pain that could not be isolated using the BPI-SF alone. The incidence and localization of pain on movement differed between the population of women who received a specific exercise intervention and those who received standard care (Figure 2). Patterns of pain over time fluctuated in the control group, whereas the intervention group reported a linear decrease in pain. Residual pain on shoulder movement remained apparent in both groups at 18-months postradiation, but that finding was not reflected in the BPI-SF results. The literature supports our findings on persistent pain among breast cancer survivors,^3,7,8,28-30 and in our study of young women carefully screened and excluded for pre-existent shoulder conditions or comorbid medical conditions, recurrent articular pain was nonetheless prevalent. It seems that unidentified or multiple factors may be part of the etiology of pain in this young adult cohort.

Although the BPI-SF is a generic measurement tool commonly used to assess and measure cancer patients’ pain levels, the lack of variance in our BPI-SF severity and interference outcomes over time (T1-T6) (Table 1, Table 2), the variety of “other” unrelated regions (Figure 1) identified by the BPI-SF, and the contrast in our findings on specific physical examination emphasize the potential limitations of this clinical tool.

Limitations

Recruitment of young adult women was difficult because of our stringent inclusion criteria, the long-term follow-up, and the relatively small population of breast cancer patients in this age demographic. Therefore, the duration of the recruitment phase, despite our having access to a specialized young adult and adolescent clinic in our institute, greatly surpassed the expectations we had when we designed the study. In addition, there remains an inherent bias in participants who accept participation in a study that includes exercise interventions. Potential participants who exercise regularly or have a positive inclination toward doing exercise are more likely to participate. Despite the prescription of a targeted 12-week upper-limb intervention in this study, the general activity levels of both groups may have had an impact on the significance of this study. In addition, the low adherence to the use of self-reported logs failed to capture the true compliance rates of our participants because their lack of tracking does not indicate failure to comply with the program. The use of weekly or biweekly telephone calls to monitor compliance rates of activity more vigilantly may be used in future studies.

Conclusions

Advances in clinical management of breast cancer have improved survival outcomes, and morbidity over recent years, yet symptoms such as pain remain prevalent in this population. The results of this study showed that a targeted, 12-week upper-limb exercise intervention postradiation transiently improved levels of shoulder pain without a concomitant impact on chronic pain or any positive influence on activities of daily living 18 months posttreatment. Furthermore, future studies should use a variety of measurement tools to evaluate trunk and upper-limb pain in women with breast cancer and investigate the optimal timing of postradiation exercise interventions.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Hope & Cope, the CURE foundation, and the Jewish General Hospital Foundation/Weekend to End Breast Cancer for providing the financial resources needed to sustain this research study. They also thank the McGill Adolescent and Young Adult program for its continued support. Previous oral presentations of research Muanza TM, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a progressive exercise program for young women with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(3):s35-s36.

A 26-year-old man presented to uroligy clinicians with right testicular pain and a right epididymal mass. It was a challenge to diagnose the cause—until he revealed some essential clues.

The differential diagnosis included testicular malignancy and lymphoma. However, tumor markers were within normal limits. Tests for HIV and syphilis were negative. The clinicians also considered granulomatous or chronic orchitis, but after treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the pain and palpable epididymal mass had resolved. Then, follow-up testicular ultrasound images showed new diffuse heterogeneous hypoechoic lesions in the right testis.

The patient elected to have a right radical orchiectomy with sperm cryopreserved. He recovered well, and semen analysis did not show any abnormalities.

Pathology of the surgical specimen revealed necrotizing and nonnecrotizing granulomas. At this point, the patient recollected that he had developed cervical lymphadenopathy and oral ulcers several weeks after traveling to South America, 8 months before presenting with the testicular symptoms.

Combined with another clue—frequent exposure to cats during his South America trip—the patient’s symptoms now created a clearer picture. He had been diagnosed with toxoplasmosis at the time but had not received treatment because he was immunocompetent. The patient’s symptoms had resolved spontaneously, and he said he had  been in his usual health between then and when he developed the testicular pain.

Based on this new information, the clinicians conducted immunohistochemical tests, which revealed isolated cysts about 20 µm in diameter, confirming a diagnosis of testicular toxoplasmosis. They started him on systemic toxoplasmosis treatment; he has been in good health since.

The clinicians note that toxoplasmosis is highly prevalent, infecting up to 30% of the world’s population. Cat feces is one source of infection with Toxoplasma gondii, which is typically asymptomatic. In immunocompetent patients, it tends to present as an acute infection that is benign and self-limited.

Only a few cases of testicular toxoplasmosis have been reported in the literature, and all have been in immunocompromised patients. Because this patient was immunocompetent, the case is  unique, being the only one reported as yet. Given the immunocompetence, the clinicians say, the patient demonstrates the need for clinicians to have a high index of suspicion.

Source:
Wong V, Amarasekera C, Kundu S. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018. pii: bcr-2018-224962.

A 26-year-old man presented to uroligy clinicians with right testicular pain and a right epididymal mass. It was a challenge to diagnose the cause—until he revealed some essential clues.

The differential diagnosis included testicular malignancy and lymphoma. However, tumor markers were within normal limits. Tests for HIV and syphilis were negative. The clinicians also considered granulomatous or chronic orchitis, but after treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the pain and palpable epididymal mass had resolved. Then, follow-up testicular ultrasound images showed new diffuse heterogeneous hypoechoic lesions in the right testis.

The patient elected to have a right radical orchiectomy with sperm cryopreserved. He recovered well, and semen analysis did not show any abnormalities.

Pathology of the surgical specimen revealed necrotizing and nonnecrotizing granulomas. At this point, the patient recollected that he had developed cervical lymphadenopathy and oral ulcers several weeks after traveling to South America, 8 months before presenting with the testicular symptoms.

Combined with another clue—frequent exposure to cats during his South America trip—the patient’s symptoms now created a clearer picture. He had been diagnosed with toxoplasmosis at the time but had not received treatment because he was immunocompetent. The patient’s symptoms had resolved spontaneously, and he said he had  been in his usual health between then and when he developed the testicular pain.

Based on this new information, the clinicians conducted immunohistochemical tests, which revealed isolated cysts about 20 µm in diameter, confirming a diagnosis of testicular toxoplasmosis. They started him on systemic toxoplasmosis treatment; he has been in good health since.

The clinicians note that toxoplasmosis is highly prevalent, infecting up to 30% of the world’s population. Cat feces is one source of infection with Toxoplasma gondii, which is typically asymptomatic. In immunocompetent patients, it tends to present as an acute infection that is benign and self-limited.

Only a few cases of testicular toxoplasmosis have been reported in the literature, and all have been in immunocompromised patients. Because this patient was immunocompetent, the case is  unique, being the only one reported as yet. Given the immunocompetence, the clinicians say, the patient demonstrates the need for clinicians to have a high index of suspicion.

Source:
Wong V, Amarasekera C, Kundu S. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018. pii: bcr-2018-224962.

A 26-year-old man presented to uroligy clinicians with right testicular pain and a right epididymal mass. It was a challenge to diagnose the cause—until he revealed some essential clues.

The differential diagnosis included testicular malignancy and lymphoma. However, tumor markers were within normal limits. Tests for HIV and syphilis were negative. The clinicians also considered granulomatous or chronic orchitis, but after treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, the pain and palpable epididymal mass had resolved. Then, follow-up testicular ultrasound images showed new diffuse heterogeneous hypoechoic lesions in the right testis.

The patient elected to have a right radical orchiectomy with sperm cryopreserved. He recovered well, and semen analysis did not show any abnormalities.

Pathology of the surgical specimen revealed necrotizing and nonnecrotizing granulomas. At this point, the patient recollected that he had developed cervical lymphadenopathy and oral ulcers several weeks after traveling to South America, 8 months before presenting with the testicular symptoms.

Combined with another clue—frequent exposure to cats during his South America trip—the patient’s symptoms now created a clearer picture. He had been diagnosed with toxoplasmosis at the time but had not received treatment because he was immunocompetent. The patient’s symptoms had resolved spontaneously, and he said he had  been in his usual health between then and when he developed the testicular pain.

Based on this new information, the clinicians conducted immunohistochemical tests, which revealed isolated cysts about 20 µm in diameter, confirming a diagnosis of testicular toxoplasmosis. They started him on systemic toxoplasmosis treatment; he has been in good health since.

The clinicians note that toxoplasmosis is highly prevalent, infecting up to 30% of the world’s population. Cat feces is one source of infection with Toxoplasma gondii, which is typically asymptomatic. In immunocompetent patients, it tends to present as an acute infection that is benign and self-limited.

Only a few cases of testicular toxoplasmosis have been reported in the literature, and all have been in immunocompromised patients. Because this patient was immunocompetent, the case is  unique, being the only one reported as yet. Given the immunocompetence, the clinicians say, the patient demonstrates the need for clinicians to have a high index of suspicion.

Source:
Wong V, Amarasekera C, Kundu S. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018. pii: bcr-2018-224962.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

STOCKHOLM—Adding elotuzumab (E) to treatment with pomalidomide (P) and low-dose dexamethasone (d) can produce “clinically meaningful” results in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), according to an investigator for the ELOQUENT-3 trial.

In this phase 2 trial, patients who received EPd had double the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received Pd.

Additionally, adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the treatment arms.

Meletios Dimopoulos, MD, of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece, presented these results as a late-breaking abstract (LB2606) at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The ELOQUENT-3 trial enrolled MM patients who had refractory or relapsed and refractory MM. They had to have received lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI).

The patients were randomized to receive EPd (n=60) or Pd (n=57) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Pomalidomide was given orally at 4 mg on days 1 to 21 of each cycle. In the Pd arm, dexamethasone was given as a 20 mg (for patients older than 75) or 40 mg (75 and younger) tablet weekly.

In the EPd arm, dexamethasone was split between oral (8 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg tablets) and intravenous doses (8 mg or 28 mg).

Elotuzumab was given at 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for the first 2 cycles and 20 mg/kg monthly from cycle 3 on.

Patient characteristics

The patients’ median age was 69 (range, 43-81) in the EPd arm and 66 (range, 36-81) in the Pd arm. They were a median of 4.8 years (EPd) or 4.4 years (Pd) from diagnosis.

The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-8) in both groups.

Ninety percent of patients in the EPd arm and 84% of those in the Pd arm were refractory to lenalidomide. Seventy-eight percent and 82%, respectively, were refractory to a PI. And 68% and 72%, respectively, were refractory to both lenalidomide and a PI.

Treatment duration

Dr Dimopoulos noted that twice as many patients remained on treatment with EPd compared to Pd at the time of database lock (February 21, 2018). Forty percent of EPd patients (n=24) and 20% of Pd patients (n=11) were still on treatment at that time.

Patients’ primary reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression—43% of EPd recipients and 56% of Pd recipients. Two percent of EPd recipients and 4% of Pd recipients withdrew due to treatment-related toxicity. Four percent of patients in the Pd arm (and none in the EPd arm) withdrew due to maximum clinical benefit.

The median number of treatment cycles was 9 (range, 4-13) in the EPd arm and 5 (range, 3-10) in the Pd arm.

Efficacy

The ORR was 53% in the EPd arm and 26% in the Pd arm. The odds ratio was 3.25 (P=0.0029).

Eight percent of patients in the EPd arm had a complete response or stringent complete response, as did 2% of patients in the Pd arm.

The median duration of response was 8.3 months in the Pd arm and has not been reached in the EPd arm.

“Elotuzumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone showed a significant and clinically meaningful 46% reduction in the risk of progression or death,” Dr Dimopoulos said.

The median PFS was 10.3 months with EPd and 4.7 months with Pd (hazard ratio=0.54, P=0.0078).

Although overall survival data are not yet mature, there was a trend favoring EPd over Pd (hazard ratio=0.62). There were 13 deaths in the EPd arm and 18 deaths in the Pd arm.

Safety

Dr Dimopoulos said AEs were comparable between the treatment arms. He pointed out that neutropenia was less common with EPd compared to Pd, despite similar pomalidomide dose intensity. And exposure-adjusted hematologic AEs and infections were lower with EPd than with Pd.

Ninety-seven percent of patients in the EPd arm and 95% in the Pd arm had at least 1 AE.

Grade 3-4 nonhematologic AEs (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included constipation (2% and 0%), hyperglycemia (8% and 7%), bone pain (3% and 0%), dyspnea (3% and 2%), fatigue (0% and 4%), respiratory tract infection (0% and 2%), and upper respiratory tract infection (0% and 2%).

Grade 3-4 hematologic AEs (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included anemia (10% and 20%), neutropenia (13% and 27%), thrombocytopenia (8% and 5%), and lymphopenia (8% and 2%).

Grade 3-4 AEs of special interest (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included infections (13% and 22%), vascular disorders (3% and 0%), cardiac disorders (7% and 4%), and neoplasms (2% and 11%).

There were 5 grade 5 AEs in the EPd arm and 8 in the Pd arm.

In the EPd arm, grade 5 AEs included infection (n=3), cardiac failure, and general physical health deterioration.

In the Pd arm, grade 5 AEs included malignant neoplasm progression (n=4), infection, multiple organ failure and infection, myocardial infarction, and plasma cell myeloma.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

STOCKHOLM—Adding elotuzumab (E) to treatment with pomalidomide (P) and low-dose dexamethasone (d) can produce “clinically meaningful” results in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), according to an investigator for the ELOQUENT-3 trial.

In this phase 2 trial, patients who received EPd had double the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received Pd.

Additionally, adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the treatment arms.

Meletios Dimopoulos, MD, of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece, presented these results as a late-breaking abstract (LB2606) at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The ELOQUENT-3 trial enrolled MM patients who had refractory or relapsed and refractory MM. They had to have received lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI).

The patients were randomized to receive EPd (n=60) or Pd (n=57) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Pomalidomide was given orally at 4 mg on days 1 to 21 of each cycle. In the Pd arm, dexamethasone was given as a 20 mg (for patients older than 75) or 40 mg (75 and younger) tablet weekly.

In the EPd arm, dexamethasone was split between oral (8 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg tablets) and intravenous doses (8 mg or 28 mg).

Elotuzumab was given at 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for the first 2 cycles and 20 mg/kg monthly from cycle 3 on.

Patient characteristics

The patients’ median age was 69 (range, 43-81) in the EPd arm and 66 (range, 36-81) in the Pd arm. They were a median of 4.8 years (EPd) or 4.4 years (Pd) from diagnosis.

The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-8) in both groups.

Ninety percent of patients in the EPd arm and 84% of those in the Pd arm were refractory to lenalidomide. Seventy-eight percent and 82%, respectively, were refractory to a PI. And 68% and 72%, respectively, were refractory to both lenalidomide and a PI.

Treatment duration

Dr Dimopoulos noted that twice as many patients remained on treatment with EPd compared to Pd at the time of database lock (February 21, 2018). Forty percent of EPd patients (n=24) and 20% of Pd patients (n=11) were still on treatment at that time.

Patients’ primary reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression—43% of EPd recipients and 56% of Pd recipients. Two percent of EPd recipients and 4% of Pd recipients withdrew due to treatment-related toxicity. Four percent of patients in the Pd arm (and none in the EPd arm) withdrew due to maximum clinical benefit.

The median number of treatment cycles was 9 (range, 4-13) in the EPd arm and 5 (range, 3-10) in the Pd arm.

Efficacy

The ORR was 53% in the EPd arm and 26% in the Pd arm. The odds ratio was 3.25 (P=0.0029).

Eight percent of patients in the EPd arm had a complete response or stringent complete response, as did 2% of patients in the Pd arm.

The median duration of response was 8.3 months in the Pd arm and has not been reached in the EPd arm.

“Elotuzumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone showed a significant and clinically meaningful 46% reduction in the risk of progression or death,” Dr Dimopoulos said.

The median PFS was 10.3 months with EPd and 4.7 months with Pd (hazard ratio=0.54, P=0.0078).

Although overall survival data are not yet mature, there was a trend favoring EPd over Pd (hazard ratio=0.62). There were 13 deaths in the EPd arm and 18 deaths in the Pd arm.

Safety

Dr Dimopoulos said AEs were comparable between the treatment arms. He pointed out that neutropenia was less common with EPd compared to Pd, despite similar pomalidomide dose intensity. And exposure-adjusted hematologic AEs and infections were lower with EPd than with Pd.

Ninety-seven percent of patients in the EPd arm and 95% in the Pd arm had at least 1 AE.

Grade 3-4 nonhematologic AEs (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included constipation (2% and 0%), hyperglycemia (8% and 7%), bone pain (3% and 0%), dyspnea (3% and 2%), fatigue (0% and 4%), respiratory tract infection (0% and 2%), and upper respiratory tract infection (0% and 2%).

Grade 3-4 hematologic AEs (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included anemia (10% and 20%), neutropenia (13% and 27%), thrombocytopenia (8% and 5%), and lymphopenia (8% and 2%).

Grade 3-4 AEs of special interest (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included infections (13% and 22%), vascular disorders (3% and 0%), cardiac disorders (7% and 4%), and neoplasms (2% and 11%).

There were 5 grade 5 AEs in the EPd arm and 8 in the Pd arm.

In the EPd arm, grade 5 AEs included infection (n=3), cardiac failure, and general physical health deterioration.

In the Pd arm, grade 5 AEs included malignant neoplasm progression (n=4), infection, multiple organ failure and infection, myocardial infarction, and plasma cell myeloma.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

STOCKHOLM—Adding elotuzumab (E) to treatment with pomalidomide (P) and low-dose dexamethasone (d) can produce “clinically meaningful” results in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), according to an investigator for the ELOQUENT-3 trial.

In this phase 2 trial, patients who received EPd had double the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients who received Pd.

Additionally, adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the treatment arms.

Meletios Dimopoulos, MD, of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens in Greece, presented these results as a late-breaking abstract (LB2606) at the 23rd Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA).

The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The ELOQUENT-3 trial enrolled MM patients who had refractory or relapsed and refractory MM. They had to have received lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI).

The patients were randomized to receive EPd (n=60) or Pd (n=57) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Pomalidomide was given orally at 4 mg on days 1 to 21 of each cycle. In the Pd arm, dexamethasone was given as a 20 mg (for patients older than 75) or 40 mg (75 and younger) tablet weekly.

In the EPd arm, dexamethasone was split between oral (8 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg tablets) and intravenous doses (8 mg or 28 mg).

Elotuzumab was given at 10 mg/kg intravenously weekly for the first 2 cycles and 20 mg/kg monthly from cycle 3 on.

Patient characteristics

The patients’ median age was 69 (range, 43-81) in the EPd arm and 66 (range, 36-81) in the Pd arm. They were a median of 4.8 years (EPd) or 4.4 years (Pd) from diagnosis.

The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 2-8) in both groups.

Ninety percent of patients in the EPd arm and 84% of those in the Pd arm were refractory to lenalidomide. Seventy-eight percent and 82%, respectively, were refractory to a PI. And 68% and 72%, respectively, were refractory to both lenalidomide and a PI.

Treatment duration

Dr Dimopoulos noted that twice as many patients remained on treatment with EPd compared to Pd at the time of database lock (February 21, 2018). Forty percent of EPd patients (n=24) and 20% of Pd patients (n=11) were still on treatment at that time.

Patients’ primary reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression—43% of EPd recipients and 56% of Pd recipients. Two percent of EPd recipients and 4% of Pd recipients withdrew due to treatment-related toxicity. Four percent of patients in the Pd arm (and none in the EPd arm) withdrew due to maximum clinical benefit.

The median number of treatment cycles was 9 (range, 4-13) in the EPd arm and 5 (range, 3-10) in the Pd arm.

Efficacy

The ORR was 53% in the EPd arm and 26% in the Pd arm. The odds ratio was 3.25 (P=0.0029).

Eight percent of patients in the EPd arm had a complete response or stringent complete response, as did 2% of patients in the Pd arm.

The median duration of response was 8.3 months in the Pd arm and has not been reached in the EPd arm.

“Elotuzumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone showed a significant and clinically meaningful 46% reduction in the risk of progression or death,” Dr Dimopoulos said.

The median PFS was 10.3 months with EPd and 4.7 months with Pd (hazard ratio=0.54, P=0.0078).

Although overall survival data are not yet mature, there was a trend favoring EPd over Pd (hazard ratio=0.62). There were 13 deaths in the EPd arm and 18 deaths in the Pd arm.

Safety

Dr Dimopoulos said AEs were comparable between the treatment arms. He pointed out that neutropenia was less common with EPd compared to Pd, despite similar pomalidomide dose intensity. And exposure-adjusted hematologic AEs and infections were lower with EPd than with Pd.

Ninety-seven percent of patients in the EPd arm and 95% in the Pd arm had at least 1 AE.

Grade 3-4 nonhematologic AEs (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included constipation (2% and 0%), hyperglycemia (8% and 7%), bone pain (3% and 0%), dyspnea (3% and 2%), fatigue (0% and 4%), respiratory tract infection (0% and 2%), and upper respiratory tract infection (0% and 2%).

Grade 3-4 hematologic AEs (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included anemia (10% and 20%), neutropenia (13% and 27%), thrombocytopenia (8% and 5%), and lymphopenia (8% and 2%).

Grade 3-4 AEs of special interest (in the EPd and Pd arms, respectively) included infections (13% and 22%), vascular disorders (3% and 0%), cardiac disorders (7% and 4%), and neoplasms (2% and 11%).

There were 5 grade 5 AEs in the EPd arm and 8 in the Pd arm.

In the EPd arm, grade 5 AEs included infection (n=3), cardiac failure, and general physical health deterioration.

In the Pd arm, grade 5 AEs included malignant neoplasm progression (n=4), infection, multiple organ failure and infection, myocardial infarction, and plasma cell myeloma.