Therapeutic neuromodulation takes advantage of the brain’s electrochemical makeup. This allows for treatment devices that modulate neurocircuits relevant to behaviors disrupted in disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) (eg, sleep quality, appetite, cognitive, and executive functions). The default mode network (comprised of structures such as the medial prefrontal cortex [MPFC], the posterior cingulate cortex, the hippocampus, and their functional connectivity) serves as a prime example of circuitry that can be targeted by this approach.¹

For 80 years, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been an important neuromodulation option for patients with more severe illness. Recently, additional neuromodulatory approaches have been FDA-cleared, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Another approach, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been extensively studied for its potential clinical utility but is not FDA-cleared. The Table provides descriptions of these therapies.

An evolving therapeutic option

While primarily studied as a monotherapy for MDD, in clinical practice TMS (Box) is typically used as an adjunct to medication and psychotherapy.^2,3 In this context, it has demonstrated efficacy for more difficult-to-treat mood disorders with an excellent safety and tolerability profile whether used with or without medication.^4-6

To further improve the efficiency and efficacy of TMS while maintaining its safety and tolerability, researchers and clinicians have been exploring a few initiatives.

Box

Altered treatment parameters

One initiative is assessing the feasibility of altering various treatment parameters, such as the total number of treatment sessions (30 to 60 sessions); the frequency of sessions (eg, more than once daily); the total number of magnetic pulses per session (eg, >3,000); the stimulation coil localization (eg, left vs right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]; MPFC; and various methods to determine optimal coil placement (eg, EEG F3 coordinate or MRI-guided neuro-navigational methods). Such refinements offer the potential for enhanced efficacy, shorter treatment sessions, and/or improved tolerability. For example, lower frequency right DLPFC stimulations (eg, 1 Hz) can decrease the risk of seizures and improve overall tolerability. While this has not been studied as extensively as higher frequency left DLPFC stimulations (eg, 5 to 20 Hz), existing evidence supports similar efficacy between these 2 approaches.⁷

Theta burst stimulation. Some TMS devices can be adapted to deliver theta burst stimulation (TBS). This produces trains of triple, 50 Hz, pulsed bursts (usually with 200 ms inter-burst intervals occurring at a rate of 5 Hz; at 80% MT) to model naturally occurring theta rhythms. These bursts can be administered in stimulation protocols using intermittent TBS (iTBS) (eg, 10 bursts of triplets over 2 seconds every 10 seconds; 30 pulses per burst; for approximately 3 minutes; totaling 600 pulses) or continuous TBS (cTBS) bursts given in an uninterrupted train (eg, 40 seconds, 600 pulses). Evidence indicates these protocols facilitate long-term potentiation (ie, iTBS) and long-term depression (ie, cTBS), which in turn can modulate synaptic plasticity.

Continue to: While some clinicians are using...

While some clinicians are using TBS off-label, a recent non-inferiority trial (N = 395) reported similar efficacy and safety comparing standard 10 Hz TMS to an iTBS protocol at 120% of resting motor threshold (both over the left DLPFC).⁸ This has led to FDA clearance of the TMS device adapted to provide iTBS in this trial.⁸

From a more practical perspective, TBS has the potential to reduce the number of pulses (eg, 600 vs 3,000) and the total number of sessions required, as well as the duration of treatment sessions (eg, 37.5 minutes to <5 minutes). This can accelerate the time to response and decrease patient and staff commitment, with resulting cost savings.⁹ Despite this recent progress, ongoing research still needs to clarify issues such as the risk/benefit profile, particularly in younger and older populations, as well as assessment of duration of initial benefit and appropriate maintenance strategies.

New devices

Another initiative is the development of alternative TMS equipment. For example, newer coil designs with enhanced cooling ability allow for a substantial decrease in the required inter-train interval duration between stimulation trains, thus shortening the total session duration by approximately 50% (eg, from 37.5 to 19 minutes). The use of different coil arrays (eg, the H-coil capable of deeper vs surface stimulation) may allow for more direct stimulation of relevant neurocircuitry (eg, cingulate cortex), possibly improving efficacy and shortening time to onset of benefit. However, in head-to-head comparisons with single-coil devices, enhanced efficacy for depression has not been clearly demonstrated. One caveat is that the increase in depth of magnetic field penetration results in a loss of focality, resulting in the stimulation of larger brain areas. This might increase the risk of adverse effects such as seizures.

Increasing durability of effect

Because high relapse and recurrence rates compromise the initial benefit of any antidepressant therapy, appropriate maintenance strategies are essential. Several studies have evaluated strategies to maintain the acute benefit of TMS for treatment-resistant depression.

One was a 6-month, open-label TMS durability of effect trial for acute responders (n = 99) in the pivotal registration study.⁵ During this study, all participants were given antidepressant medication monotherapy. In addition, with early indication of relapse, patients received a reintroduction of TMS sessions (32/99 patients; mean number of sessions = 14.3). With this protocol, approximately 84% re-achieved their response status. The overall relapse rate was approximately 13%.⁵

Continue to: In a 1-year naturalistic study...

In a 1-year naturalistic study, 63% of patients (75/120) who met response or remission criteria after an acute course of TMS still met response criteria after 12 months. These patients received clinician-determined maintenance treatment that included reintroduction of TMS when indicated.³

In a prospective, 12-month, multisite, randomized pilot study, 67 patients with treatment-resistant MDD underwent an antidepressant medication washout and then received 30 sessions of TMS monotherapy.¹⁰ Those who met criteria for improvement (n = 49) were then randomized to once-monthly TMS or observation only. All patients remained medication-free but could receive TMS re-introduction if they deteriorated. At the end of the study, both groups demonstrated comparable outcomes, with a trend to a longer time before relapse among participants who received once-monthly TMS. Although these results are preliminary, they suggest that some patients could be treated both acutely and then maintained with TMS alone.

Re-introducing TMS in patients who show early signs of relapse after having an initial response achieves rates of sustained improvement that compare favorably with those of other strategies used to manage patients with treatment-resistant depression.

TMS vs ECT

The question often arises as to whether TMS is a viable alternate treatment to ECT. I believe the answer is unequivocally yes and no. By this, I mean some patients who in the past only had ECT as their next option when medications and psychotherapy were insufficient may now consider TMS. In support, there is evidence of comparable efficacy between TMS and ECT in a subgroup of patients who were considered clinically appropriate for ECT.^11-13

How to best identify this group remains unclear, but investigators are exploring predictive biomarkers. For example, a large study (N = 1,188), with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reported that depressed patients could be divided into 4 neurophysiological “biotypes” based on different patterns of aberrant connectivity in limbic and fronto-striatal networks.¹⁴ The authors further noted that such distinctions were helpful in predicting response in a subgroup of patients (n = 154) who received TMS.

Continue to: For now...

For now, experience indicates certain clinical factors may provide some guidance. Patients are usually better served by ECT if they:

• have depressive episodes of longer duration (eg, >3 years)
• have a high risk of suicide
• have psychotic or catatonic features associated with their depression
• have difficulty maintaining their physical well-being
• have bipolar depression.

Although existing evidence supports a possible benefit with TMS for bipolar depression (used in combination with a mood stabilizer), the lack of a definitive trial (precluding FDA clearance for this indication) and the lack of insurance coverage both limit the routine use of TMS for this indication.¹⁵

One potential advantage of TMS over ECT is a lower cost.¹³ Transcranial magnetic stimulation also may make it possible to achieve similar efficacy as ECT with fewer cognitive adverse effects when used in combination with ECT to reduce the number of acute ECT treatments required or as part of a maintenance strategy after a patient experiences an acute response to ECT.¹³

Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) vs ECT. An experimental treatment, MST uses a TMS device capable of producing more intense magnetic fields sufficient to induce a seizure.¹⁶ The advantage of MST over ECT-induced seizures is better control of intra-cerebral current path and density, thus avoiding deeper cortical areas associated with memory (eg, hippocampus) and minimizing cognitive adverse effects. As with ECT, however, anesthesia and muscle relaxation are required. Presently, MST remains investigational.

Other potential indications

In addition to MDD, TMS is also being studied as a potential treatment for other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Continue to: Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A recent double-blind study that evaluated a deep TMS (DTMS) device reported a significantly better outcome based on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score with active high-frequency (20 Hz) DTMS (n = 18) vs a sham control (n = 15).¹⁷ The initial benefit persisted up to 1 month after the end of treatment. The authors speculated that this benefit may be due to direct modulation of the anterior cingulate cortex. These results led to the first FDA clearance of a deep TMS device for treating OCD.

Cognition. Because TMS does not require a seizure to produce its antidepressant effect and does not require anesthesia, the risk of neurocognitive disruption is low. In fact, evidence suggests TMS may have beneficial cognitive effects.¹⁸

In an effort to take advantage of this benefit, researchers have explored providing psychoeducation and psychotherapy sessions (eg, behavioral activation) during TMS treatments (“online”).^19,20 The rationale is that neurocircuitry subserving various cognitive functions may be in a heightened state of receptivity during a TMS treatment, which would allow patients to assimilate and better utilize the therapeutic information provided.^19,20

Researchers are also looking at the use of TMS to treat patients with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia. These patients often experience comorbid depression, and TMS could potentially improve memory via both its pro-cognitive and antidepressant effects.¹ The lack of effective treatments for dementia supports pursuing TMS as a therapeutic option for these patients.

Other neuropsychiatric disorders. In addition to early-onset cognitive problems, other neurologic indications with promising data for TMS include chronic pain syndromes, Parkinson’s disease, tinnitus, and migraine headaches (a hand-held FDA-cleared device is now available for treating migraines). In addition to OCD and bipolar depression, other psychiatric indications with promising data include schizophrenia (eg, refractory auditory hallucinations, negative symptoms), posttraumatic stress disorder, and various addictive disorders.²¹ Because results have been mixed for most of these disorders, definitive trials are needed to clearly characterize the potential role of TMS.

Continue to: An ongoing evolution

Neuromodulation is undergoing a renaissance spurred on by the need for more effective treatments to manage some of our most challenging illnesses. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and other forms of therapeutic neuromodulation are welcome additions for managing treatment-resistant depression, OCD, and possibly other disorders. But perhaps their greatest value is as a bellwether for what’s to come. In addition to the ongoing refinements to existing neuro­modulation devices, newer modulation approaches (eg, temporal interference stimulation) and the search for reliable biomarkers may dramatically expand and enhance our clinical options.^14,22

Bottom Line

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) continues to evolve as a nonpharmacologic treatment for mood disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and potentially for other indications. Recent developments, including altered treatment parameters, new devices, and strategies for increasing the durability of antidepressant effects, have enhanced the benefits of TMS.

Related Resources

• Ziemann U. Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand? Exp Brain Res. 2017;235(4):973-984.
• Janicak PG, Sackett V, Kudrna K, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depression: an update on recent advances. Current Psychiatry. 2016:15(6):49-56.

Therapeutic neuromodulation takes advantage of the brain’s electrochemical makeup. This allows for treatment devices that modulate neurocircuits relevant to behaviors disrupted in disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) (eg, sleep quality, appetite, cognitive, and executive functions). The default mode network (comprised of structures such as the medial prefrontal cortex [MPFC], the posterior cingulate cortex, the hippocampus, and their functional connectivity) serves as a prime example of circuitry that can be targeted by this approach.¹

For 80 years, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been an important neuromodulation option for patients with more severe illness. Recently, additional neuromodulatory approaches have been FDA-cleared, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Another approach, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been extensively studied for its potential clinical utility but is not FDA-cleared. The Table provides descriptions of these therapies.

An evolving therapeutic option

While primarily studied as a monotherapy for MDD, in clinical practice TMS (Box) is typically used as an adjunct to medication and psychotherapy.^2,3 In this context, it has demonstrated efficacy for more difficult-to-treat mood disorders with an excellent safety and tolerability profile whether used with or without medication.^4-6

To further improve the efficiency and efficacy of TMS while maintaining its safety and tolerability, researchers and clinicians have been exploring a few initiatives.

Box

Altered treatment parameters

One initiative is assessing the feasibility of altering various treatment parameters, such as the total number of treatment sessions (30 to 60 sessions); the frequency of sessions (eg, more than once daily); the total number of magnetic pulses per session (eg, >3,000); the stimulation coil localization (eg, left vs right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]; MPFC; and various methods to determine optimal coil placement (eg, EEG F3 coordinate or MRI-guided neuro-navigational methods). Such refinements offer the potential for enhanced efficacy, shorter treatment sessions, and/or improved tolerability. For example, lower frequency right DLPFC stimulations (eg, 1 Hz) can decrease the risk of seizures and improve overall tolerability. While this has not been studied as extensively as higher frequency left DLPFC stimulations (eg, 5 to 20 Hz), existing evidence supports similar efficacy between these 2 approaches.⁷

Theta burst stimulation. Some TMS devices can be adapted to deliver theta burst stimulation (TBS). This produces trains of triple, 50 Hz, pulsed bursts (usually with 200 ms inter-burst intervals occurring at a rate of 5 Hz; at 80% MT) to model naturally occurring theta rhythms. These bursts can be administered in stimulation protocols using intermittent TBS (iTBS) (eg, 10 bursts of triplets over 2 seconds every 10 seconds; 30 pulses per burst; for approximately 3 minutes; totaling 600 pulses) or continuous TBS (cTBS) bursts given in an uninterrupted train (eg, 40 seconds, 600 pulses). Evidence indicates these protocols facilitate long-term potentiation (ie, iTBS) and long-term depression (ie, cTBS), which in turn can modulate synaptic plasticity.

Continue to: While some clinicians are using...

While some clinicians are using TBS off-label, a recent non-inferiority trial (N = 395) reported similar efficacy and safety comparing standard 10 Hz TMS to an iTBS protocol at 120% of resting motor threshold (both over the left DLPFC).⁸ This has led to FDA clearance of the TMS device adapted to provide iTBS in this trial.⁸

From a more practical perspective, TBS has the potential to reduce the number of pulses (eg, 600 vs 3,000) and the total number of sessions required, as well as the duration of treatment sessions (eg, 37.5 minutes to <5 minutes). This can accelerate the time to response and decrease patient and staff commitment, with resulting cost savings.⁹ Despite this recent progress, ongoing research still needs to clarify issues such as the risk/benefit profile, particularly in younger and older populations, as well as assessment of duration of initial benefit and appropriate maintenance strategies.

New devices

Another initiative is the development of alternative TMS equipment. For example, newer coil designs with enhanced cooling ability allow for a substantial decrease in the required inter-train interval duration between stimulation trains, thus shortening the total session duration by approximately 50% (eg, from 37.5 to 19 minutes). The use of different coil arrays (eg, the H-coil capable of deeper vs surface stimulation) may allow for more direct stimulation of relevant neurocircuitry (eg, cingulate cortex), possibly improving efficacy and shortening time to onset of benefit. However, in head-to-head comparisons with single-coil devices, enhanced efficacy for depression has not been clearly demonstrated. One caveat is that the increase in depth of magnetic field penetration results in a loss of focality, resulting in the stimulation of larger brain areas. This might increase the risk of adverse effects such as seizures.

Increasing durability of effect

Because high relapse and recurrence rates compromise the initial benefit of any antidepressant therapy, appropriate maintenance strategies are essential. Several studies have evaluated strategies to maintain the acute benefit of TMS for treatment-resistant depression.

One was a 6-month, open-label TMS durability of effect trial for acute responders (n = 99) in the pivotal registration study.⁵ During this study, all participants were given antidepressant medication monotherapy. In addition, with early indication of relapse, patients received a reintroduction of TMS sessions (32/99 patients; mean number of sessions = 14.3). With this protocol, approximately 84% re-achieved their response status. The overall relapse rate was approximately 13%.⁵

Continue to: In a 1-year naturalistic study...

In a 1-year naturalistic study, 63% of patients (75/120) who met response or remission criteria after an acute course of TMS still met response criteria after 12 months. These patients received clinician-determined maintenance treatment that included reintroduction of TMS when indicated.³

In a prospective, 12-month, multisite, randomized pilot study, 67 patients with treatment-resistant MDD underwent an antidepressant medication washout and then received 30 sessions of TMS monotherapy.¹⁰ Those who met criteria for improvement (n = 49) were then randomized to once-monthly TMS or observation only. All patients remained medication-free but could receive TMS re-introduction if they deteriorated. At the end of the study, both groups demonstrated comparable outcomes, with a trend to a longer time before relapse among participants who received once-monthly TMS. Although these results are preliminary, they suggest that some patients could be treated both acutely and then maintained with TMS alone.

Re-introducing TMS in patients who show early signs of relapse after having an initial response achieves rates of sustained improvement that compare favorably with those of other strategies used to manage patients with treatment-resistant depression.

TMS vs ECT

The question often arises as to whether TMS is a viable alternate treatment to ECT. I believe the answer is unequivocally yes and no. By this, I mean some patients who in the past only had ECT as their next option when medications and psychotherapy were insufficient may now consider TMS. In support, there is evidence of comparable efficacy between TMS and ECT in a subgroup of patients who were considered clinically appropriate for ECT.^11-13

How to best identify this group remains unclear, but investigators are exploring predictive biomarkers. For example, a large study (N = 1,188), with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reported that depressed patients could be divided into 4 neurophysiological “biotypes” based on different patterns of aberrant connectivity in limbic and fronto-striatal networks.¹⁴ The authors further noted that such distinctions were helpful in predicting response in a subgroup of patients (n = 154) who received TMS.

Continue to: For now...

For now, experience indicates certain clinical factors may provide some guidance. Patients are usually better served by ECT if they:

• have depressive episodes of longer duration (eg, >3 years)
• have a high risk of suicide
• have psychotic or catatonic features associated with their depression
• have difficulty maintaining their physical well-being
• have bipolar depression.

Although existing evidence supports a possible benefit with TMS for bipolar depression (used in combination with a mood stabilizer), the lack of a definitive trial (precluding FDA clearance for this indication) and the lack of insurance coverage both limit the routine use of TMS for this indication.¹⁵

One potential advantage of TMS over ECT is a lower cost.¹³ Transcranial magnetic stimulation also may make it possible to achieve similar efficacy as ECT with fewer cognitive adverse effects when used in combination with ECT to reduce the number of acute ECT treatments required or as part of a maintenance strategy after a patient experiences an acute response to ECT.¹³

Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) vs ECT. An experimental treatment, MST uses a TMS device capable of producing more intense magnetic fields sufficient to induce a seizure.¹⁶ The advantage of MST over ECT-induced seizures is better control of intra-cerebral current path and density, thus avoiding deeper cortical areas associated with memory (eg, hippocampus) and minimizing cognitive adverse effects. As with ECT, however, anesthesia and muscle relaxation are required. Presently, MST remains investigational.

Other potential indications

In addition to MDD, TMS is also being studied as a potential treatment for other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Continue to: Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A recent double-blind study that evaluated a deep TMS (DTMS) device reported a significantly better outcome based on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score with active high-frequency (20 Hz) DTMS (n = 18) vs a sham control (n = 15).¹⁷ The initial benefit persisted up to 1 month after the end of treatment. The authors speculated that this benefit may be due to direct modulation of the anterior cingulate cortex. These results led to the first FDA clearance of a deep TMS device for treating OCD.

Cognition. Because TMS does not require a seizure to produce its antidepressant effect and does not require anesthesia, the risk of neurocognitive disruption is low. In fact, evidence suggests TMS may have beneficial cognitive effects.¹⁸

In an effort to take advantage of this benefit, researchers have explored providing psychoeducation and psychotherapy sessions (eg, behavioral activation) during TMS treatments (“online”).^19,20 The rationale is that neurocircuitry subserving various cognitive functions may be in a heightened state of receptivity during a TMS treatment, which would allow patients to assimilate and better utilize the therapeutic information provided.^19,20

Researchers are also looking at the use of TMS to treat patients with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia. These patients often experience comorbid depression, and TMS could potentially improve memory via both its pro-cognitive and antidepressant effects.¹ The lack of effective treatments for dementia supports pursuing TMS as a therapeutic option for these patients.

Other neuropsychiatric disorders. In addition to early-onset cognitive problems, other neurologic indications with promising data for TMS include chronic pain syndromes, Parkinson’s disease, tinnitus, and migraine headaches (a hand-held FDA-cleared device is now available for treating migraines). In addition to OCD and bipolar depression, other psychiatric indications with promising data include schizophrenia (eg, refractory auditory hallucinations, negative symptoms), posttraumatic stress disorder, and various addictive disorders.²¹ Because results have been mixed for most of these disorders, definitive trials are needed to clearly characterize the potential role of TMS.

Continue to: An ongoing evolution

Neuromodulation is undergoing a renaissance spurred on by the need for more effective treatments to manage some of our most challenging illnesses. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and other forms of therapeutic neuromodulation are welcome additions for managing treatment-resistant depression, OCD, and possibly other disorders. But perhaps their greatest value is as a bellwether for what’s to come. In addition to the ongoing refinements to existing neuro­modulation devices, newer modulation approaches (eg, temporal interference stimulation) and the search for reliable biomarkers may dramatically expand and enhance our clinical options.^14,22

Bottom Line

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) continues to evolve as a nonpharmacologic treatment for mood disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and potentially for other indications. Recent developments, including altered treatment parameters, new devices, and strategies for increasing the durability of antidepressant effects, have enhanced the benefits of TMS.

Related Resources

• Ziemann U. Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand? Exp Brain Res. 2017;235(4):973-984.
• Janicak PG, Sackett V, Kudrna K, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depression: an update on recent advances. Current Psychiatry. 2016:15(6):49-56.

Therapeutic neuromodulation takes advantage of the brain’s electrochemical makeup. This allows for treatment devices that modulate neurocircuits relevant to behaviors disrupted in disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) (eg, sleep quality, appetite, cognitive, and executive functions). The default mode network (comprised of structures such as the medial prefrontal cortex [MPFC], the posterior cingulate cortex, the hippocampus, and their functional connectivity) serves as a prime example of circuitry that can be targeted by this approach.¹

For 80 years, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been an important neuromodulation option for patients with more severe illness. Recently, additional neuromodulatory approaches have been FDA-cleared, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Another approach, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been extensively studied for its potential clinical utility but is not FDA-cleared. The Table provides descriptions of these therapies.

An evolving therapeutic option

While primarily studied as a monotherapy for MDD, in clinical practice TMS (Box) is typically used as an adjunct to medication and psychotherapy.^2,3 In this context, it has demonstrated efficacy for more difficult-to-treat mood disorders with an excellent safety and tolerability profile whether used with or without medication.^4-6

To further improve the efficiency and efficacy of TMS while maintaining its safety and tolerability, researchers and clinicians have been exploring a few initiatives.

Box

Altered treatment parameters

One initiative is assessing the feasibility of altering various treatment parameters, such as the total number of treatment sessions (30 to 60 sessions); the frequency of sessions (eg, more than once daily); the total number of magnetic pulses per session (eg, >3,000); the stimulation coil localization (eg, left vs right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex [DLPFC]; MPFC; and various methods to determine optimal coil placement (eg, EEG F3 coordinate or MRI-guided neuro-navigational methods). Such refinements offer the potential for enhanced efficacy, shorter treatment sessions, and/or improved tolerability. For example, lower frequency right DLPFC stimulations (eg, 1 Hz) can decrease the risk of seizures and improve overall tolerability. While this has not been studied as extensively as higher frequency left DLPFC stimulations (eg, 5 to 20 Hz), existing evidence supports similar efficacy between these 2 approaches.⁷

Theta burst stimulation. Some TMS devices can be adapted to deliver theta burst stimulation (TBS). This produces trains of triple, 50 Hz, pulsed bursts (usually with 200 ms inter-burst intervals occurring at a rate of 5 Hz; at 80% MT) to model naturally occurring theta rhythms. These bursts can be administered in stimulation protocols using intermittent TBS (iTBS) (eg, 10 bursts of triplets over 2 seconds every 10 seconds; 30 pulses per burst; for approximately 3 minutes; totaling 600 pulses) or continuous TBS (cTBS) bursts given in an uninterrupted train (eg, 40 seconds, 600 pulses). Evidence indicates these protocols facilitate long-term potentiation (ie, iTBS) and long-term depression (ie, cTBS), which in turn can modulate synaptic plasticity.

Continue to: While some clinicians are using...

While some clinicians are using TBS off-label, a recent non-inferiority trial (N = 395) reported similar efficacy and safety comparing standard 10 Hz TMS to an iTBS protocol at 120% of resting motor threshold (both over the left DLPFC).⁸ This has led to FDA clearance of the TMS device adapted to provide iTBS in this trial.⁸

From a more practical perspective, TBS has the potential to reduce the number of pulses (eg, 600 vs 3,000) and the total number of sessions required, as well as the duration of treatment sessions (eg, 37.5 minutes to <5 minutes). This can accelerate the time to response and decrease patient and staff commitment, with resulting cost savings.⁹ Despite this recent progress, ongoing research still needs to clarify issues such as the risk/benefit profile, particularly in younger and older populations, as well as assessment of duration of initial benefit and appropriate maintenance strategies.

New devices

Another initiative is the development of alternative TMS equipment. For example, newer coil designs with enhanced cooling ability allow for a substantial decrease in the required inter-train interval duration between stimulation trains, thus shortening the total session duration by approximately 50% (eg, from 37.5 to 19 minutes). The use of different coil arrays (eg, the H-coil capable of deeper vs surface stimulation) may allow for more direct stimulation of relevant neurocircuitry (eg, cingulate cortex), possibly improving efficacy and shortening time to onset of benefit. However, in head-to-head comparisons with single-coil devices, enhanced efficacy for depression has not been clearly demonstrated. One caveat is that the increase in depth of magnetic field penetration results in a loss of focality, resulting in the stimulation of larger brain areas. This might increase the risk of adverse effects such as seizures.

Increasing durability of effect

Because high relapse and recurrence rates compromise the initial benefit of any antidepressant therapy, appropriate maintenance strategies are essential. Several studies have evaluated strategies to maintain the acute benefit of TMS for treatment-resistant depression.

One was a 6-month, open-label TMS durability of effect trial for acute responders (n = 99) in the pivotal registration study.⁵ During this study, all participants were given antidepressant medication monotherapy. In addition, with early indication of relapse, patients received a reintroduction of TMS sessions (32/99 patients; mean number of sessions = 14.3). With this protocol, approximately 84% re-achieved their response status. The overall relapse rate was approximately 13%.⁵

Continue to: In a 1-year naturalistic study...

In a 1-year naturalistic study, 63% of patients (75/120) who met response or remission criteria after an acute course of TMS still met response criteria after 12 months. These patients received clinician-determined maintenance treatment that included reintroduction of TMS when indicated.³

In a prospective, 12-month, multisite, randomized pilot study, 67 patients with treatment-resistant MDD underwent an antidepressant medication washout and then received 30 sessions of TMS monotherapy.¹⁰ Those who met criteria for improvement (n = 49) were then randomized to once-monthly TMS or observation only. All patients remained medication-free but could receive TMS re-introduction if they deteriorated. At the end of the study, both groups demonstrated comparable outcomes, with a trend to a longer time before relapse among participants who received once-monthly TMS. Although these results are preliminary, they suggest that some patients could be treated both acutely and then maintained with TMS alone.

Re-introducing TMS in patients who show early signs of relapse after having an initial response achieves rates of sustained improvement that compare favorably with those of other strategies used to manage patients with treatment-resistant depression.

TMS vs ECT

The question often arises as to whether TMS is a viable alternate treatment to ECT. I believe the answer is unequivocally yes and no. By this, I mean some patients who in the past only had ECT as their next option when medications and psychotherapy were insufficient may now consider TMS. In support, there is evidence of comparable efficacy between TMS and ECT in a subgroup of patients who were considered clinically appropriate for ECT.^11-13

How to best identify this group remains unclear, but investigators are exploring predictive biomarkers. For example, a large study (N = 1,188), with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) reported that depressed patients could be divided into 4 neurophysiological “biotypes” based on different patterns of aberrant connectivity in limbic and fronto-striatal networks.¹⁴ The authors further noted that such distinctions were helpful in predicting response in a subgroup of patients (n = 154) who received TMS.

Continue to: For now...

For now, experience indicates certain clinical factors may provide some guidance. Patients are usually better served by ECT if they:

• have depressive episodes of longer duration (eg, >3 years)
• have a high risk of suicide
• have psychotic or catatonic features associated with their depression
• have difficulty maintaining their physical well-being
• have bipolar depression.

Although existing evidence supports a possible benefit with TMS for bipolar depression (used in combination with a mood stabilizer), the lack of a definitive trial (precluding FDA clearance for this indication) and the lack of insurance coverage both limit the routine use of TMS for this indication.¹⁵

One potential advantage of TMS over ECT is a lower cost.¹³ Transcranial magnetic stimulation also may make it possible to achieve similar efficacy as ECT with fewer cognitive adverse effects when used in combination with ECT to reduce the number of acute ECT treatments required or as part of a maintenance strategy after a patient experiences an acute response to ECT.¹³

Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) vs ECT. An experimental treatment, MST uses a TMS device capable of producing more intense magnetic fields sufficient to induce a seizure.¹⁶ The advantage of MST over ECT-induced seizures is better control of intra-cerebral current path and density, thus avoiding deeper cortical areas associated with memory (eg, hippocampus) and minimizing cognitive adverse effects. As with ECT, however, anesthesia and muscle relaxation are required. Presently, MST remains investigational.

Other potential indications

In addition to MDD, TMS is also being studied as a potential treatment for other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Continue to: Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). A recent double-blind study that evaluated a deep TMS (DTMS) device reported a significantly better outcome based on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score with active high-frequency (20 Hz) DTMS (n = 18) vs a sham control (n = 15).¹⁷ The initial benefit persisted up to 1 month after the end of treatment. The authors speculated that this benefit may be due to direct modulation of the anterior cingulate cortex. These results led to the first FDA clearance of a deep TMS device for treating OCD.

Cognition. Because TMS does not require a seizure to produce its antidepressant effect and does not require anesthesia, the risk of neurocognitive disruption is low. In fact, evidence suggests TMS may have beneficial cognitive effects.¹⁸

In an effort to take advantage of this benefit, researchers have explored providing psychoeducation and psychotherapy sessions (eg, behavioral activation) during TMS treatments (“online”).^19,20 The rationale is that neurocircuitry subserving various cognitive functions may be in a heightened state of receptivity during a TMS treatment, which would allow patients to assimilate and better utilize the therapeutic information provided.^19,20

Researchers are also looking at the use of TMS to treat patients with mild cognitive impairment or early dementia. These patients often experience comorbid depression, and TMS could potentially improve memory via both its pro-cognitive and antidepressant effects.¹ The lack of effective treatments for dementia supports pursuing TMS as a therapeutic option for these patients.

Other neuropsychiatric disorders. In addition to early-onset cognitive problems, other neurologic indications with promising data for TMS include chronic pain syndromes, Parkinson’s disease, tinnitus, and migraine headaches (a hand-held FDA-cleared device is now available for treating migraines). In addition to OCD and bipolar depression, other psychiatric indications with promising data include schizophrenia (eg, refractory auditory hallucinations, negative symptoms), posttraumatic stress disorder, and various addictive disorders.²¹ Because results have been mixed for most of these disorders, definitive trials are needed to clearly characterize the potential role of TMS.

Continue to: An ongoing evolution

Neuromodulation is undergoing a renaissance spurred on by the need for more effective treatments to manage some of our most challenging illnesses. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and other forms of therapeutic neuromodulation are welcome additions for managing treatment-resistant depression, OCD, and possibly other disorders. But perhaps their greatest value is as a bellwether for what’s to come. In addition to the ongoing refinements to existing neuro­modulation devices, newer modulation approaches (eg, temporal interference stimulation) and the search for reliable biomarkers may dramatically expand and enhance our clinical options.^14,22

Bottom Line

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) continues to evolve as a nonpharmacologic treatment for mood disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and potentially for other indications. Recent developments, including altered treatment parameters, new devices, and strategies for increasing the durability of antidepressant effects, have enhanced the benefits of TMS.

Related Resources

• Ziemann U. Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand? Exp Brain Res. 2017;235(4):973-984.
• Janicak PG, Sackett V, Kudrna K, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depression: an update on recent advances. Current Psychiatry. 2016:15(6):49-56.

Patients with cirrhosis should be risk stratified and counseled accordingly before all but the most urgent surgeries, cautions a clinical practice update from the American Gastroenterological Association.

University of Virginia Health System

These risks, which include mortality and reflect “the profound effects of hepatic synthetic dysfunction and portal hypertension,” require presurgical evaluation based on CTP score (Child-Pugh class), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Mayo Postoperative Mortality Risk Score, or another proven risk-stratification system, writes Patrick G. Northup, MD, of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, together with his associates. “There is no single definitive risk-stratification system to determine operative risk in all patients with cirrhosis, and we recommend using multiple methods,” they elaborated in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The prevalence of cirrhosis is rising, affected patients are living longer, and liver disease is more advanced and may involve comorbidities that merit consideration of surgery, noted Dr. Northup and his associates. However, cirrhosis increases the risk for serious postoperative complications, including hepatic decompensation, worsening of liver synthetic function, exacerbated portal hypertension, wound dehiscence, pleural effusions, pneumonia, bacterial peritonitis, bleeding, and multiple organ failure. Because clinical trials of surgery in cirrhotic patients are lacking, the experts stress the need for case-by-case management.

There is no definite threshold that precludes all surgeries in cases of cirrhosis, but a Child-Pugh class C (CTP score over 10) or MELD score over 20 greatly increases the risk of postoperative decompensation and death. For these patients, “all but the most urgent and life-saving procedures” should be canceled or postponed until after liver transplantation, the experts wrote. For less severe cirrhosis, it is key to consider the type and anatomic site of the proposed surgery. Hepatobiliary surgeries, other intra-abdominal surgeries, cardiovascular surgeries, and thoracic procedures are most likely to lead to serious complications.

Preoperative care should emphasize control of ascites, variceal bleeding risk, and hepatic encephalopathy. Bleeding and clotting safety thresholds in cirrhosis are unknown, and individualized management, ideally with viscoelastic testing–directed therapy, is warranted instead of protocol transfusions to a target international normalized ratio (INR). Bleeding events are more common in critically ill patients with plasma fibrinogen ratios under 100 mg/dL.

Segmental hepatic resection (usually for malignancy), the most studied procedure in cirrhosis, is generally safe in the absence of clinically significant portal hypertension. For patients who do have portal hypertension, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has not clearly been shown to outperform conservative management, although small case series have found that TIPS during deep pelvic or colonic resection decompresses abdominal collaterals.

Because of the risk of poor outcomes, patients with cirrhosis and incompletely controlled ascites should not undergo abdominal hernia repair unless they have an incarceration that is not manually reducible or suspected strangulation. Bariatric surgery is contraindicated in cases of clinically significant portal hypertension but otherwise can be performed at a center with cirrhosis expertise. Sleeve gastrectomy at the same time as liver transplantation is also an option for select patients with obesity.

SOURCE: Northup PG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.043.

Patients with cirrhosis should be risk stratified and counseled accordingly before all but the most urgent surgeries, cautions a clinical practice update from the American Gastroenterological Association.

University of Virginia Health System

These risks, which include mortality and reflect “the profound effects of hepatic synthetic dysfunction and portal hypertension,” require presurgical evaluation based on CTP score (Child-Pugh class), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Mayo Postoperative Mortality Risk Score, or another proven risk-stratification system, writes Patrick G. Northup, MD, of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, together with his associates. “There is no single definitive risk-stratification system to determine operative risk in all patients with cirrhosis, and we recommend using multiple methods,” they elaborated in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The prevalence of cirrhosis is rising, affected patients are living longer, and liver disease is more advanced and may involve comorbidities that merit consideration of surgery, noted Dr. Northup and his associates. However, cirrhosis increases the risk for serious postoperative complications, including hepatic decompensation, worsening of liver synthetic function, exacerbated portal hypertension, wound dehiscence, pleural effusions, pneumonia, bacterial peritonitis, bleeding, and multiple organ failure. Because clinical trials of surgery in cirrhotic patients are lacking, the experts stress the need for case-by-case management.

There is no definite threshold that precludes all surgeries in cases of cirrhosis, but a Child-Pugh class C (CTP score over 10) or MELD score over 20 greatly increases the risk of postoperative decompensation and death. For these patients, “all but the most urgent and life-saving procedures” should be canceled or postponed until after liver transplantation, the experts wrote. For less severe cirrhosis, it is key to consider the type and anatomic site of the proposed surgery. Hepatobiliary surgeries, other intra-abdominal surgeries, cardiovascular surgeries, and thoracic procedures are most likely to lead to serious complications.

Preoperative care should emphasize control of ascites, variceal bleeding risk, and hepatic encephalopathy. Bleeding and clotting safety thresholds in cirrhosis are unknown, and individualized management, ideally with viscoelastic testing–directed therapy, is warranted instead of protocol transfusions to a target international normalized ratio (INR). Bleeding events are more common in critically ill patients with plasma fibrinogen ratios under 100 mg/dL.

Segmental hepatic resection (usually for malignancy), the most studied procedure in cirrhosis, is generally safe in the absence of clinically significant portal hypertension. For patients who do have portal hypertension, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has not clearly been shown to outperform conservative management, although small case series have found that TIPS during deep pelvic or colonic resection decompresses abdominal collaterals.

Because of the risk of poor outcomes, patients with cirrhosis and incompletely controlled ascites should not undergo abdominal hernia repair unless they have an incarceration that is not manually reducible or suspected strangulation. Bariatric surgery is contraindicated in cases of clinically significant portal hypertension but otherwise can be performed at a center with cirrhosis expertise. Sleeve gastrectomy at the same time as liver transplantation is also an option for select patients with obesity.

SOURCE: Northup PG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.043.

Patients with cirrhosis should be risk stratified and counseled accordingly before all but the most urgent surgeries, cautions a clinical practice update from the American Gastroenterological Association.

University of Virginia Health System

These risks, which include mortality and reflect “the profound effects of hepatic synthetic dysfunction and portal hypertension,” require presurgical evaluation based on CTP score (Child-Pugh class), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Mayo Postoperative Mortality Risk Score, or another proven risk-stratification system, writes Patrick G. Northup, MD, of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, together with his associates. “There is no single definitive risk-stratification system to determine operative risk in all patients with cirrhosis, and we recommend using multiple methods,” they elaborated in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The prevalence of cirrhosis is rising, affected patients are living longer, and liver disease is more advanced and may involve comorbidities that merit consideration of surgery, noted Dr. Northup and his associates. However, cirrhosis increases the risk for serious postoperative complications, including hepatic decompensation, worsening of liver synthetic function, exacerbated portal hypertension, wound dehiscence, pleural effusions, pneumonia, bacterial peritonitis, bleeding, and multiple organ failure. Because clinical trials of surgery in cirrhotic patients are lacking, the experts stress the need for case-by-case management.

There is no definite threshold that precludes all surgeries in cases of cirrhosis, but a Child-Pugh class C (CTP score over 10) or MELD score over 20 greatly increases the risk of postoperative decompensation and death. For these patients, “all but the most urgent and life-saving procedures” should be canceled or postponed until after liver transplantation, the experts wrote. For less severe cirrhosis, it is key to consider the type and anatomic site of the proposed surgery. Hepatobiliary surgeries, other intra-abdominal surgeries, cardiovascular surgeries, and thoracic procedures are most likely to lead to serious complications.

Preoperative care should emphasize control of ascites, variceal bleeding risk, and hepatic encephalopathy. Bleeding and clotting safety thresholds in cirrhosis are unknown, and individualized management, ideally with viscoelastic testing–directed therapy, is warranted instead of protocol transfusions to a target international normalized ratio (INR). Bleeding events are more common in critically ill patients with plasma fibrinogen ratios under 100 mg/dL.

Segmental hepatic resection (usually for malignancy), the most studied procedure in cirrhosis, is generally safe in the absence of clinically significant portal hypertension. For patients who do have portal hypertension, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has not clearly been shown to outperform conservative management, although small case series have found that TIPS during deep pelvic or colonic resection decompresses abdominal collaterals.

Because of the risk of poor outcomes, patients with cirrhosis and incompletely controlled ascites should not undergo abdominal hernia repair unless they have an incarceration that is not manually reducible or suspected strangulation. Bariatric surgery is contraindicated in cases of clinically significant portal hypertension but otherwise can be performed at a center with cirrhosis expertise. Sleeve gastrectomy at the same time as liver transplantation is also an option for select patients with obesity.

SOURCE: Northup PG et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep 28. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.043.

This month I am reading The Poison Squad, by Deborah Blum. It’s a fascinating book about Harvey Wiley, the first commissioner of the FDA and head chemist for 29 years (until 1912). He spearheaded passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, the first legislation to regulate what could be put into our food and drink. Prior to (and even subsequent to) passage, hundreds of deaths, mostly children, were linked to toxic additives or adulteration of food. Formaldehyde, for example, was routinely added to milk as a preservative and was linked to dozens of children’s deaths. This single, dedicated scientist fought governmental corruption and big business to protect the public.

The book describes dark money corrupting senators, fake news, denigration of science, suppression of FDA scientific studies that ran counter to administration goals, solicitation of “scientists” who would publicly denounce test results, advocates of states’ rights who fought federal overreach, those that predicted regulation would “ruin American business” and other themes that parallel what we encounter in current news. There are even examples of policy by Executive Order (related to purity of whiskey of all things). One could easily be reading about tobacco, climate change, or vaccines and encounter the same themes. “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” (Santayana 1905 and Churchill 1948).

We are covering a number of important articles this issue. Our cover stories concern surgery in patients with cirrhosis, post colonoscopy FIT testing, and liver transplant in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Another important story reminds us to help our IBD patients with reproductive counseling.

Just a few months to go before Digestive Disease Week^® (DDW) in San Diego. Registration is open and hotels are filling; visit www.DDW.org/registration for more information. This year’s scientific lineup is stellar.

John I. Allen, MD, MBA, AGAF
Editor in Chief

This month I am reading The Poison Squad, by Deborah Blum. It’s a fascinating book about Harvey Wiley, the first commissioner of the FDA and head chemist for 29 years (until 1912). He spearheaded passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, the first legislation to regulate what could be put into our food and drink. Prior to (and even subsequent to) passage, hundreds of deaths, mostly children, were linked to toxic additives or adulteration of food. Formaldehyde, for example, was routinely added to milk as a preservative and was linked to dozens of children’s deaths. This single, dedicated scientist fought governmental corruption and big business to protect the public.

The book describes dark money corrupting senators, fake news, denigration of science, suppression of FDA scientific studies that ran counter to administration goals, solicitation of “scientists” who would publicly denounce test results, advocates of states’ rights who fought federal overreach, those that predicted regulation would “ruin American business” and other themes that parallel what we encounter in current news. There are even examples of policy by Executive Order (related to purity of whiskey of all things). One could easily be reading about tobacco, climate change, or vaccines and encounter the same themes. “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” (Santayana 1905 and Churchill 1948).

We are covering a number of important articles this issue. Our cover stories concern surgery in patients with cirrhosis, post colonoscopy FIT testing, and liver transplant in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Another important story reminds us to help our IBD patients with reproductive counseling.

Just a few months to go before Digestive Disease Week^® (DDW) in San Diego. Registration is open and hotels are filling; visit www.DDW.org/registration for more information. This year’s scientific lineup is stellar.

John I. Allen, MD, MBA, AGAF
Editor in Chief

This month I am reading The Poison Squad, by Deborah Blum. It’s a fascinating book about Harvey Wiley, the first commissioner of the FDA and head chemist for 29 years (until 1912). He spearheaded passage of the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, the first legislation to regulate what could be put into our food and drink. Prior to (and even subsequent to) passage, hundreds of deaths, mostly children, were linked to toxic additives or adulteration of food. Formaldehyde, for example, was routinely added to milk as a preservative and was linked to dozens of children’s deaths. This single, dedicated scientist fought governmental corruption and big business to protect the public.

The book describes dark money corrupting senators, fake news, denigration of science, suppression of FDA scientific studies that ran counter to administration goals, solicitation of “scientists” who would publicly denounce test results, advocates of states’ rights who fought federal overreach, those that predicted regulation would “ruin American business” and other themes that parallel what we encounter in current news. There are even examples of policy by Executive Order (related to purity of whiskey of all things). One could easily be reading about tobacco, climate change, or vaccines and encounter the same themes. “Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it” (Santayana 1905 and Churchill 1948).

We are covering a number of important articles this issue. Our cover stories concern surgery in patients with cirrhosis, post colonoscopy FIT testing, and liver transplant in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Another important story reminds us to help our IBD patients with reproductive counseling.

Just a few months to go before Digestive Disease Week^® (DDW) in San Diego. Registration is open and hotels are filling; visit www.DDW.org/registration for more information. This year’s scientific lineup is stellar.

John I. Allen, MD, MBA, AGAF
Editor in Chief

For children and adolescents with strong clinical suspicion for celiac disease, repeated transglutaminase-2-IgA (TG2-IgA) levels that are more than 10 times higher than the upper limit of normal often suffices for diagnosis, according to an American Gastroenterological Association clinical practice update and expert review.

This approach precludes the need for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in about 30%-50% of cases, wrote Steffen Husby, MD, PhD, of Odense University Hospital (Denmark), together with his associates in Gastroenterology. “When such a strongly positive TG2-IgA is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for celiac disease is virtually 100%.” But for adults, they recommend confirmatory histologic analysis of duodenal biopsies with Marsh classification, counting of lymphocytes per high-power field, and morphometry.

Transglutaminase-2 is the major autoantigen present in celiac disease and can now be assessed with accurate, convenient, high-throughput tests, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. To maximize test TG2-IgA accuracy, Dr. Husby and his associates recommend testing patients who have compatible signs and symptoms of celiac disease or are asymptomatic but have other risk factors, such as confirmed autoimmune diseases (type 1 diabetes, autoimmune thyroid or liver diseases), chromosome abnormalities (Down or Turner syndrome), or first-degree relatives with celiac disease.

Several other serologic tests are available but have a more limited role in diagnosing celiac disease, according to the practice update. Perhaps most useful is the endomysial antibody (EMA) test, which evaluates tissue-bound TG2-IgA. This test is highly specific but labor-intensive and user-sensitive and thus is best used to confirm a positive TG2-IgA result. Deamidated gliadin peptide antibody assays are less accurate than TG2-IgA, while HLA-DQ2/DQ8 testing is best reserved for cases where the diagnosis is complicated by a prior gluten-free diet or inconclusive antibody titers or histology.

SOURCE: Husby S et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec 19. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.010.

For children and adolescents with strong clinical suspicion for celiac disease, repeated transglutaminase-2-IgA (TG2-IgA) levels that are more than 10 times higher than the upper limit of normal often suffices for diagnosis, according to an American Gastroenterological Association clinical practice update and expert review.

This approach precludes the need for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in about 30%-50% of cases, wrote Steffen Husby, MD, PhD, of Odense University Hospital (Denmark), together with his associates in Gastroenterology. “When such a strongly positive TG2-IgA is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for celiac disease is virtually 100%.” But for adults, they recommend confirmatory histologic analysis of duodenal biopsies with Marsh classification, counting of lymphocytes per high-power field, and morphometry.

Transglutaminase-2 is the major autoantigen present in celiac disease and can now be assessed with accurate, convenient, high-throughput tests, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. To maximize test TG2-IgA accuracy, Dr. Husby and his associates recommend testing patients who have compatible signs and symptoms of celiac disease or are asymptomatic but have other risk factors, such as confirmed autoimmune diseases (type 1 diabetes, autoimmune thyroid or liver diseases), chromosome abnormalities (Down or Turner syndrome), or first-degree relatives with celiac disease.

Several other serologic tests are available but have a more limited role in diagnosing celiac disease, according to the practice update. Perhaps most useful is the endomysial antibody (EMA) test, which evaluates tissue-bound TG2-IgA. This test is highly specific but labor-intensive and user-sensitive and thus is best used to confirm a positive TG2-IgA result. Deamidated gliadin peptide antibody assays are less accurate than TG2-IgA, while HLA-DQ2/DQ8 testing is best reserved for cases where the diagnosis is complicated by a prior gluten-free diet or inconclusive antibody titers or histology.

SOURCE: Husby S et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec 19. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.010.

For children and adolescents with strong clinical suspicion for celiac disease, repeated transglutaminase-2-IgA (TG2-IgA) levels that are more than 10 times higher than the upper limit of normal often suffices for diagnosis, according to an American Gastroenterological Association clinical practice update and expert review.

This approach precludes the need for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in about 30%-50% of cases, wrote Steffen Husby, MD, PhD, of Odense University Hospital (Denmark), together with his associates in Gastroenterology. “When such a strongly positive TG2-IgA is combined with a positive endomysial antibody in a second blood sample, the positive predictive value for celiac disease is virtually 100%.” But for adults, they recommend confirmatory histologic analysis of duodenal biopsies with Marsh classification, counting of lymphocytes per high-power field, and morphometry.

Transglutaminase-2 is the major autoantigen present in celiac disease and can now be assessed with accurate, convenient, high-throughput tests, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. To maximize test TG2-IgA accuracy, Dr. Husby and his associates recommend testing patients who have compatible signs and symptoms of celiac disease or are asymptomatic but have other risk factors, such as confirmed autoimmune diseases (type 1 diabetes, autoimmune thyroid or liver diseases), chromosome abnormalities (Down or Turner syndrome), or first-degree relatives with celiac disease.

Several other serologic tests are available but have a more limited role in diagnosing celiac disease, according to the practice update. Perhaps most useful is the endomysial antibody (EMA) test, which evaluates tissue-bound TG2-IgA. This test is highly specific but labor-intensive and user-sensitive and thus is best used to confirm a positive TG2-IgA result. Deamidated gliadin peptide antibody assays are less accurate than TG2-IgA, while HLA-DQ2/DQ8 testing is best reserved for cases where the diagnosis is complicated by a prior gluten-free diet or inconclusive antibody titers or histology.

SOURCE: Husby S et al. Gastroenterology. 2018 Dec 19. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.010.

A number of conditions can mimic myositis, but clues that can point to the correct diagnosis are often present in cases involving the mimics, according to Lisa Christopher-Stine, MD.

For example, elevated levels of certain muscle enzymes are an important source of diagnostic information, Dr. Christopher-Stine, director of the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center, Baltimore, said at the Winter Rheumatology Symposium sponsored by the American College of Rheumatology.

Isolated elevations in aldolase can be seen in connective tissue–associated interstitial lung disease or in patients with fascial edema, and aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatine kinase (CK) levels can also be helpful, she explained.

The latter can also be elevated in the absence of muscle disease, for example, in healthy individuals following exercise. CK peaks at 24 hours after exercise before returning to baseline by 72 hours. In an experimental setting, a threefold increase in CK levels has been seen at 8-24 hours after exercise, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
 

“HyperCKemia”

Trauma from causes such as intramuscular injection, electromyography (EMG), major surgery, or biopsy can also lead to increased CK levels. Motor neuron disease can also cause such increases. In one study, 75% of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis had a mean twofold increase in CK levels, she said.

Asymptomatic CK elevations may also represent presymptomatic myopathies, type 1 or 2 macro-CK, manual labor occupations, or they may be idiopathic.

Race can play a role in CK levels as well. Black people tend to have higher CK levels than white people, she said, noting that one study of more than 10,000 adults showed that black race was strongly associated with CK, and that body composition largely explained differences in CK by age, but not by race/ethnicity (Medicine. Aug 2016;95[33]:e4344).

“So elevated CK may not herald any discernible illness,” she said.

Dr. Christopher-Stine described a case involving an otherwise healthy 30-year-old man with a CK level of 695 IU/L that was found incidentally. He had a desk job, no recent travel, and denied weakness, myalgias, joint pain, dysphagia, shortness of breath, and fevers. In this case, the elevated CK was felt to be secondary to his African American race given that other causes were ruled out.

Another case involved a 72-year-old man with left-arm pain. A cardiac event was ruled out, and CK was found to be about 4,500 IU/L. He reported “flare-ups” of diffuse swelling of the hands and feet. X-rays showed concerning signs of erosions. His transaminases and electromyogram were normal; he reported no weakness or myalgia; and an MRI showed no muscle edema. He was diagnosed with macro-CK, which refers to CK with an increased molecular weight. A clue to this diagnosis is a normal liver function test. In some cases, muscle/brain CK levels (CK-MB) are elevated and higher than total CK, she noted.

She presented an algorithm for the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with elevated CK of unclear significance. Her recommended approach involves repeat CK assessment and a closer look at family history, medication, drug/toxin history, examination for weakness and neurologic abnormalities, and additional lab assessments in those whose levels remain elevated. In those in whom a diagnosis is not identified, the algorithm calls for observation every 3 months – including physical examination and labs – in asymptomatic patients with levels at less than five times the upper limit of normal, and further evaluation, including EMG with nerve-conduction velocity testing, muscle biopsy, and MRI in those with (or who later develop) marked elevation greater than five times the upper limit of normal and/or symptoms.
 

Patient assessment

The physical examination should involve localization and quantification of weakness, and assessment for fever, rash, atrophy/wasting/scooping of forearms, fasciculations, cranial nerve involvement, Raynaud’s phenomenon, nailfold capillary changes, arthritis, calcinosis, “mechanic’s hands,” signs of other autoimmune diseases, and lung crackles. Initial laboratory testing should include HIV and hepatitis B and C testing; measurement of CK, AST, ALT, aldolase, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and magnesium levels; a comprehensive metabolic panel and complete blood count; and measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein.

“Weakness may be secondary to a neuropathy, myopathy, or a problem at the neuropathic junction. Many causes of weakness can be readily identified by careful history taking, focused physical examination, and directed laboratory evaluation,” she said.

Features pointing toward a diagnosis of myositis include characteristic rashes, gradual symptom onset, proximal limb and truncal weakness, other connective tissue disease features such as Raynaud’s and arthritis, and the presence of lung disease, including interstitial lung disease or unexplained infiltrates, she said.

Features pointing away from a diagnosis of myositis include a family history of a similar illness, weakness that is associated with eating or fasting, neurologic signs, cranial nerve involvement, fasciculations, severe muscle cramping, early atrophy, and creatine phosphokinase levels that are either less than 2 times or more than 100 times the upper limit of normal.

Among the conditions to consider in the presence of the features that point away from a myositis diagnosis are muscular dystrophies, metabolic myopathies, and toxic (drug-induced) myopathies, to name a few, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.

She described a number of other cases to illustrate the need for – and to help develop – a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with apparent myositis.
 

Muscular dystrophies

A 38-year-old woman with limited scleroderma and anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies developed proximal weakness over 9 months and was eventually unable to walk up a flight of stairs. She had heliotrope rash and Gottron’s sign, her serum CK was 723 IU/L, and EMG showed an irritable myopathy.

Muscle biopsy showed inflammation, and she was treated with prednisone, but this led to worsening weakness. She complained of prominent fatigue and double vision at the end of the day, and these symptoms did not improve with steroids.

Anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibodies were negative, but she had a decrement on repetitive nerve stimulation testing.

She was treated with pyridostigmine and experienced near-complete resolution of her proximal weakness and double vision. A chest CT scan showed thymic hyperplasia; thymectomy was recommended.

In another case, a 19-year-old woman who complained of leg pain after exercise was found to have intact strength but asymmetric calf hypertrophy. Her CK level was 5,000 IU/L, and she was referred to rule out acute myositis.

A quadriceps biopsy was performed and showed abnormal dystrophin immunostaining but no inflammation. A molecular genetic analysis showed deletions in Xp21 and she was diagnosed as a manifesting carrier of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. It was recommended that she be evaluated for cardiomyopathy and receive genetic counseling.

A number of other cases presented by Dr. Christopher-Stine highlighted other muscular dystrophies that can mimic myositis, such as:

• Myotonic dystrophies. These are more often type 2 than type 1. Myotonia may be subtle, cataracts are seen early in all patients, and cardiac arrhythmias are common.
• Limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2 B (dysferlinopathy). In the legs, this often affects the gastrocnemius muscle, and this will be visible on MRI. In the arms, it most often affects the biceps, sparing the deltoids. CKs are typically very high.
• Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). This involves facial weakness, especially obicularis oris, in 95% of cases, as well as scapular weakness and winging, inflammation on muscle biopsy in 75% of cases, and typically is endomysial or perivascular.

Metabolic myopathies

Among metabolic myopathies that can mimic myositis are disorders of carbohydrate metabolism such as McArdle’s disease, 6-phosphofructokinase deficiency, and Pompe’s disease (adult acid maltase deficiency); disorders of lipid metabolism such as carnitine deficiency and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2 (CPT2) deficiency; and disorders of purine metabolism, such as myoadenylate deaminase deficiency.

A 27-year-old patient who complained of weakness with activity was referred for possible myositis and was found to have a CK of 3,650 IU/L that never normalized. Physical examination showed intact strength and no muscle atrophy or fasciculations, and an enzyme stain for myophosphorylase showed a normal staining pattern and complete absence of the enzyme on quadricep biopsy. A 22-year-old man with similar symptoms plus recent onset of brown/black urine after physical activity had CK of 110,000 IU/L when symptomatic, and also underwent biopsy after being referred for possible myopathy. Both patients were ultimately diagnosed with CPT2 deficiency, which is associated with risk of rhabdomyolysis triggered by prolonged exercise, diets low in carbohydrates and high in fat, or by fasting.

Myalgias are common, and CK levels are normal or only mildly elevated between episodes in CPT2 deficiency, Dr. Christopher-Stine noted.
 

Toxic myopathies

Drug-induced myopathies are among the most common etiologies of myopathy and can range from mild myalgia to massive rhabdomyolysis. They can cause mild to severe weakness and may be chronic. The mechanism of toxic injury is direct via myotoxins such as ethyl alcohol, glucocorticoids, lipid-lowering drugs, cocaine, antimalarial drugs, antipsychotic drugs, colchicine, and Ipecac syrup.

One case described by Dr. Christopher-Stine involved “statin myopathy.”

A 55-year-old man on atorvastatin complained of myalgias and brown urine, but had no definitive weakness. He had intact strength and diffuse myalgias that weren’t reproducible. His CK was 45,000 IU/L.

Statin myopathy, as seen in this patient, is usually self-limited and is not associated with autoimmunity or with anti-HMGCR autoantibody positivity.

The mechanism is unknown, but statin myopathy has an incidence of 1.2 per 10,000 patient-years. Myalgias, myositis, rhabdomyolysis, and asymptomatic hyperCKemia are commonly seen. This is in contrast to the immune-mediated necrotizing myelitis that can be secondary to statins and is responsive to immunosuppression, she noted.
 

Other myositis mimics

In addition to these common myositis mimics, certain other neurologic diseases (such as ALS and cervical myelopathy), endocrinopathies (such as hypothyroidism), and infections (like toxoplasmosis) can also be mistaken for myositis, Dr. Christopher-Stine said, noting that cases illustrating these mimics underscore the need for careful consideration of possible alternate diagnoses.

“While most noninflammatory myopathies are self-limited or have no therapies available, knowing the diagnosis can be helpful for genetic counseling of the patient and family, for mitigating risk factors, and for precluding the use of unwarranted immunosuppressive agents,” she said.

Dr. Christopher-Stine reported having intellectual property interest in a novel Inova Diagnostics autoantibody assay detection for anti-HMGCR. She was also the safety officer for the JBT-101 Trial sponsored by Corbus and funded by the National Institutes of Health.

[email protected]

A number of conditions can mimic myositis, but clues that can point to the correct diagnosis are often present in cases involving the mimics, according to Lisa Christopher-Stine, MD.

For example, elevated levels of certain muscle enzymes are an important source of diagnostic information, Dr. Christopher-Stine, director of the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center, Baltimore, said at the Winter Rheumatology Symposium sponsored by the American College of Rheumatology.

Isolated elevations in aldolase can be seen in connective tissue–associated interstitial lung disease or in patients with fascial edema, and aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatine kinase (CK) levels can also be helpful, she explained.

The latter can also be elevated in the absence of muscle disease, for example, in healthy individuals following exercise. CK peaks at 24 hours after exercise before returning to baseline by 72 hours. In an experimental setting, a threefold increase in CK levels has been seen at 8-24 hours after exercise, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
 

“HyperCKemia”

Trauma from causes such as intramuscular injection, electromyography (EMG), major surgery, or biopsy can also lead to increased CK levels. Motor neuron disease can also cause such increases. In one study, 75% of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis had a mean twofold increase in CK levels, she said.

Asymptomatic CK elevations may also represent presymptomatic myopathies, type 1 or 2 macro-CK, manual labor occupations, or they may be idiopathic.

Race can play a role in CK levels as well. Black people tend to have higher CK levels than white people, she said, noting that one study of more than 10,000 adults showed that black race was strongly associated with CK, and that body composition largely explained differences in CK by age, but not by race/ethnicity (Medicine. Aug 2016;95[33]:e4344).

“So elevated CK may not herald any discernible illness,” she said.

Dr. Christopher-Stine described a case involving an otherwise healthy 30-year-old man with a CK level of 695 IU/L that was found incidentally. He had a desk job, no recent travel, and denied weakness, myalgias, joint pain, dysphagia, shortness of breath, and fevers. In this case, the elevated CK was felt to be secondary to his African American race given that other causes were ruled out.

Another case involved a 72-year-old man with left-arm pain. A cardiac event was ruled out, and CK was found to be about 4,500 IU/L. He reported “flare-ups” of diffuse swelling of the hands and feet. X-rays showed concerning signs of erosions. His transaminases and electromyogram were normal; he reported no weakness or myalgia; and an MRI showed no muscle edema. He was diagnosed with macro-CK, which refers to CK with an increased molecular weight. A clue to this diagnosis is a normal liver function test. In some cases, muscle/brain CK levels (CK-MB) are elevated and higher than total CK, she noted.

She presented an algorithm for the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with elevated CK of unclear significance. Her recommended approach involves repeat CK assessment and a closer look at family history, medication, drug/toxin history, examination for weakness and neurologic abnormalities, and additional lab assessments in those whose levels remain elevated. In those in whom a diagnosis is not identified, the algorithm calls for observation every 3 months – including physical examination and labs – in asymptomatic patients with levels at less than five times the upper limit of normal, and further evaluation, including EMG with nerve-conduction velocity testing, muscle biopsy, and MRI in those with (or who later develop) marked elevation greater than five times the upper limit of normal and/or symptoms.
 

Patient assessment

The physical examination should involve localization and quantification of weakness, and assessment for fever, rash, atrophy/wasting/scooping of forearms, fasciculations, cranial nerve involvement, Raynaud’s phenomenon, nailfold capillary changes, arthritis, calcinosis, “mechanic’s hands,” signs of other autoimmune diseases, and lung crackles. Initial laboratory testing should include HIV and hepatitis B and C testing; measurement of CK, AST, ALT, aldolase, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and magnesium levels; a comprehensive metabolic panel and complete blood count; and measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein.

“Weakness may be secondary to a neuropathy, myopathy, or a problem at the neuropathic junction. Many causes of weakness can be readily identified by careful history taking, focused physical examination, and directed laboratory evaluation,” she said.

Features pointing toward a diagnosis of myositis include characteristic rashes, gradual symptom onset, proximal limb and truncal weakness, other connective tissue disease features such as Raynaud’s and arthritis, and the presence of lung disease, including interstitial lung disease or unexplained infiltrates, she said.

Features pointing away from a diagnosis of myositis include a family history of a similar illness, weakness that is associated with eating or fasting, neurologic signs, cranial nerve involvement, fasciculations, severe muscle cramping, early atrophy, and creatine phosphokinase levels that are either less than 2 times or more than 100 times the upper limit of normal.

Among the conditions to consider in the presence of the features that point away from a myositis diagnosis are muscular dystrophies, metabolic myopathies, and toxic (drug-induced) myopathies, to name a few, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.

She described a number of other cases to illustrate the need for – and to help develop – a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with apparent myositis.
 

Muscular dystrophies

A 38-year-old woman with limited scleroderma and anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies developed proximal weakness over 9 months and was eventually unable to walk up a flight of stairs. She had heliotrope rash and Gottron’s sign, her serum CK was 723 IU/L, and EMG showed an irritable myopathy.

Muscle biopsy showed inflammation, and she was treated with prednisone, but this led to worsening weakness. She complained of prominent fatigue and double vision at the end of the day, and these symptoms did not improve with steroids.

Anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibodies were negative, but she had a decrement on repetitive nerve stimulation testing.

She was treated with pyridostigmine and experienced near-complete resolution of her proximal weakness and double vision. A chest CT scan showed thymic hyperplasia; thymectomy was recommended.

In another case, a 19-year-old woman who complained of leg pain after exercise was found to have intact strength but asymmetric calf hypertrophy. Her CK level was 5,000 IU/L, and she was referred to rule out acute myositis.

A quadriceps biopsy was performed and showed abnormal dystrophin immunostaining but no inflammation. A molecular genetic analysis showed deletions in Xp21 and she was diagnosed as a manifesting carrier of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. It was recommended that she be evaluated for cardiomyopathy and receive genetic counseling.

A number of other cases presented by Dr. Christopher-Stine highlighted other muscular dystrophies that can mimic myositis, such as:

• Myotonic dystrophies. These are more often type 2 than type 1. Myotonia may be subtle, cataracts are seen early in all patients, and cardiac arrhythmias are common.
• Limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2 B (dysferlinopathy). In the legs, this often affects the gastrocnemius muscle, and this will be visible on MRI. In the arms, it most often affects the biceps, sparing the deltoids. CKs are typically very high.
• Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). This involves facial weakness, especially obicularis oris, in 95% of cases, as well as scapular weakness and winging, inflammation on muscle biopsy in 75% of cases, and typically is endomysial or perivascular.

Metabolic myopathies

Among metabolic myopathies that can mimic myositis are disorders of carbohydrate metabolism such as McArdle’s disease, 6-phosphofructokinase deficiency, and Pompe’s disease (adult acid maltase deficiency); disorders of lipid metabolism such as carnitine deficiency and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2 (CPT2) deficiency; and disorders of purine metabolism, such as myoadenylate deaminase deficiency.

A 27-year-old patient who complained of weakness with activity was referred for possible myositis and was found to have a CK of 3,650 IU/L that never normalized. Physical examination showed intact strength and no muscle atrophy or fasciculations, and an enzyme stain for myophosphorylase showed a normal staining pattern and complete absence of the enzyme on quadricep biopsy. A 22-year-old man with similar symptoms plus recent onset of brown/black urine after physical activity had CK of 110,000 IU/L when symptomatic, and also underwent biopsy after being referred for possible myopathy. Both patients were ultimately diagnosed with CPT2 deficiency, which is associated with risk of rhabdomyolysis triggered by prolonged exercise, diets low in carbohydrates and high in fat, or by fasting.

Myalgias are common, and CK levels are normal or only mildly elevated between episodes in CPT2 deficiency, Dr. Christopher-Stine noted.
 

Toxic myopathies

Drug-induced myopathies are among the most common etiologies of myopathy and can range from mild myalgia to massive rhabdomyolysis. They can cause mild to severe weakness and may be chronic. The mechanism of toxic injury is direct via myotoxins such as ethyl alcohol, glucocorticoids, lipid-lowering drugs, cocaine, antimalarial drugs, antipsychotic drugs, colchicine, and Ipecac syrup.

One case described by Dr. Christopher-Stine involved “statin myopathy.”

A 55-year-old man on atorvastatin complained of myalgias and brown urine, but had no definitive weakness. He had intact strength and diffuse myalgias that weren’t reproducible. His CK was 45,000 IU/L.

Statin myopathy, as seen in this patient, is usually self-limited and is not associated with autoimmunity or with anti-HMGCR autoantibody positivity.

The mechanism is unknown, but statin myopathy has an incidence of 1.2 per 10,000 patient-years. Myalgias, myositis, rhabdomyolysis, and asymptomatic hyperCKemia are commonly seen. This is in contrast to the immune-mediated necrotizing myelitis that can be secondary to statins and is responsive to immunosuppression, she noted.
 

Other myositis mimics

In addition to these common myositis mimics, certain other neurologic diseases (such as ALS and cervical myelopathy), endocrinopathies (such as hypothyroidism), and infections (like toxoplasmosis) can also be mistaken for myositis, Dr. Christopher-Stine said, noting that cases illustrating these mimics underscore the need for careful consideration of possible alternate diagnoses.

“While most noninflammatory myopathies are self-limited or have no therapies available, knowing the diagnosis can be helpful for genetic counseling of the patient and family, for mitigating risk factors, and for precluding the use of unwarranted immunosuppressive agents,” she said.

Dr. Christopher-Stine reported having intellectual property interest in a novel Inova Diagnostics autoantibody assay detection for anti-HMGCR. She was also the safety officer for the JBT-101 Trial sponsored by Corbus and funded by the National Institutes of Health.

[email protected]

A number of conditions can mimic myositis, but clues that can point to the correct diagnosis are often present in cases involving the mimics, according to Lisa Christopher-Stine, MD.

For example, elevated levels of certain muscle enzymes are an important source of diagnostic information, Dr. Christopher-Stine, director of the Johns Hopkins Myositis Center, Baltimore, said at the Winter Rheumatology Symposium sponsored by the American College of Rheumatology.

Isolated elevations in aldolase can be seen in connective tissue–associated interstitial lung disease or in patients with fascial edema, and aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatine kinase (CK) levels can also be helpful, she explained.

The latter can also be elevated in the absence of muscle disease, for example, in healthy individuals following exercise. CK peaks at 24 hours after exercise before returning to baseline by 72 hours. In an experimental setting, a threefold increase in CK levels has been seen at 8-24 hours after exercise, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.
 

“HyperCKemia”

Trauma from causes such as intramuscular injection, electromyography (EMG), major surgery, or biopsy can also lead to increased CK levels. Motor neuron disease can also cause such increases. In one study, 75% of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis had a mean twofold increase in CK levels, she said.

Asymptomatic CK elevations may also represent presymptomatic myopathies, type 1 or 2 macro-CK, manual labor occupations, or they may be idiopathic.

Race can play a role in CK levels as well. Black people tend to have higher CK levels than white people, she said, noting that one study of more than 10,000 adults showed that black race was strongly associated with CK, and that body composition largely explained differences in CK by age, but not by race/ethnicity (Medicine. Aug 2016;95[33]:e4344).

“So elevated CK may not herald any discernible illness,” she said.

Dr. Christopher-Stine described a case involving an otherwise healthy 30-year-old man with a CK level of 695 IU/L that was found incidentally. He had a desk job, no recent travel, and denied weakness, myalgias, joint pain, dysphagia, shortness of breath, and fevers. In this case, the elevated CK was felt to be secondary to his African American race given that other causes were ruled out.

Another case involved a 72-year-old man with left-arm pain. A cardiac event was ruled out, and CK was found to be about 4,500 IU/L. He reported “flare-ups” of diffuse swelling of the hands and feet. X-rays showed concerning signs of erosions. His transaminases and electromyogram were normal; he reported no weakness or myalgia; and an MRI showed no muscle edema. He was diagnosed with macro-CK, which refers to CK with an increased molecular weight. A clue to this diagnosis is a normal liver function test. In some cases, muscle/brain CK levels (CK-MB) are elevated and higher than total CK, she noted.

She presented an algorithm for the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with elevated CK of unclear significance. Her recommended approach involves repeat CK assessment and a closer look at family history, medication, drug/toxin history, examination for weakness and neurologic abnormalities, and additional lab assessments in those whose levels remain elevated. In those in whom a diagnosis is not identified, the algorithm calls for observation every 3 months – including physical examination and labs – in asymptomatic patients with levels at less than five times the upper limit of normal, and further evaluation, including EMG with nerve-conduction velocity testing, muscle biopsy, and MRI in those with (or who later develop) marked elevation greater than five times the upper limit of normal and/or symptoms.
 

Patient assessment

The physical examination should involve localization and quantification of weakness, and assessment for fever, rash, atrophy/wasting/scooping of forearms, fasciculations, cranial nerve involvement, Raynaud’s phenomenon, nailfold capillary changes, arthritis, calcinosis, “mechanic’s hands,” signs of other autoimmune diseases, and lung crackles. Initial laboratory testing should include HIV and hepatitis B and C testing; measurement of CK, AST, ALT, aldolase, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and magnesium levels; a comprehensive metabolic panel and complete blood count; and measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein.

“Weakness may be secondary to a neuropathy, myopathy, or a problem at the neuropathic junction. Many causes of weakness can be readily identified by careful history taking, focused physical examination, and directed laboratory evaluation,” she said.

Features pointing toward a diagnosis of myositis include characteristic rashes, gradual symptom onset, proximal limb and truncal weakness, other connective tissue disease features such as Raynaud’s and arthritis, and the presence of lung disease, including interstitial lung disease or unexplained infiltrates, she said.

Features pointing away from a diagnosis of myositis include a family history of a similar illness, weakness that is associated with eating or fasting, neurologic signs, cranial nerve involvement, fasciculations, severe muscle cramping, early atrophy, and creatine phosphokinase levels that are either less than 2 times or more than 100 times the upper limit of normal.

Among the conditions to consider in the presence of the features that point away from a myositis diagnosis are muscular dystrophies, metabolic myopathies, and toxic (drug-induced) myopathies, to name a few, Dr. Christopher-Stine said.

She described a number of other cases to illustrate the need for – and to help develop – a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with apparent myositis.
 

Muscular dystrophies

A 38-year-old woman with limited scleroderma and anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies developed proximal weakness over 9 months and was eventually unable to walk up a flight of stairs. She had heliotrope rash and Gottron’s sign, her serum CK was 723 IU/L, and EMG showed an irritable myopathy.

Muscle biopsy showed inflammation, and she was treated with prednisone, but this led to worsening weakness. She complained of prominent fatigue and double vision at the end of the day, and these symptoms did not improve with steroids.

Anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibodies were negative, but she had a decrement on repetitive nerve stimulation testing.

She was treated with pyridostigmine and experienced near-complete resolution of her proximal weakness and double vision. A chest CT scan showed thymic hyperplasia; thymectomy was recommended.

In another case, a 19-year-old woman who complained of leg pain after exercise was found to have intact strength but asymmetric calf hypertrophy. Her CK level was 5,000 IU/L, and she was referred to rule out acute myositis.

A quadriceps biopsy was performed and showed abnormal dystrophin immunostaining but no inflammation. A molecular genetic analysis showed deletions in Xp21 and she was diagnosed as a manifesting carrier of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. It was recommended that she be evaluated for cardiomyopathy and receive genetic counseling.

A number of other cases presented by Dr. Christopher-Stine highlighted other muscular dystrophies that can mimic myositis, such as:

• Myotonic dystrophies. These are more often type 2 than type 1. Myotonia may be subtle, cataracts are seen early in all patients, and cardiac arrhythmias are common.
• Limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2 B (dysferlinopathy). In the legs, this often affects the gastrocnemius muscle, and this will be visible on MRI. In the arms, it most often affects the biceps, sparing the deltoids. CKs are typically very high.
• Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). This involves facial weakness, especially obicularis oris, in 95% of cases, as well as scapular weakness and winging, inflammation on muscle biopsy in 75% of cases, and typically is endomysial or perivascular.

Metabolic myopathies

Among metabolic myopathies that can mimic myositis are disorders of carbohydrate metabolism such as McArdle’s disease, 6-phosphofructokinase deficiency, and Pompe’s disease (adult acid maltase deficiency); disorders of lipid metabolism such as carnitine deficiency and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2 (CPT2) deficiency; and disorders of purine metabolism, such as myoadenylate deaminase deficiency.

A 27-year-old patient who complained of weakness with activity was referred for possible myositis and was found to have a CK of 3,650 IU/L that never normalized. Physical examination showed intact strength and no muscle atrophy or fasciculations, and an enzyme stain for myophosphorylase showed a normal staining pattern and complete absence of the enzyme on quadricep biopsy. A 22-year-old man with similar symptoms plus recent onset of brown/black urine after physical activity had CK of 110,000 IU/L when symptomatic, and also underwent biopsy after being referred for possible myopathy. Both patients were ultimately diagnosed with CPT2 deficiency, which is associated with risk of rhabdomyolysis triggered by prolonged exercise, diets low in carbohydrates and high in fat, or by fasting.

Myalgias are common, and CK levels are normal or only mildly elevated between episodes in CPT2 deficiency, Dr. Christopher-Stine noted.
 

Toxic myopathies

Drug-induced myopathies are among the most common etiologies of myopathy and can range from mild myalgia to massive rhabdomyolysis. They can cause mild to severe weakness and may be chronic. The mechanism of toxic injury is direct via myotoxins such as ethyl alcohol, glucocorticoids, lipid-lowering drugs, cocaine, antimalarial drugs, antipsychotic drugs, colchicine, and Ipecac syrup.

One case described by Dr. Christopher-Stine involved “statin myopathy.”

A 55-year-old man on atorvastatin complained of myalgias and brown urine, but had no definitive weakness. He had intact strength and diffuse myalgias that weren’t reproducible. His CK was 45,000 IU/L.

Statin myopathy, as seen in this patient, is usually self-limited and is not associated with autoimmunity or with anti-HMGCR autoantibody positivity.

The mechanism is unknown, but statin myopathy has an incidence of 1.2 per 10,000 patient-years. Myalgias, myositis, rhabdomyolysis, and asymptomatic hyperCKemia are commonly seen. This is in contrast to the immune-mediated necrotizing myelitis that can be secondary to statins and is responsive to immunosuppression, she noted.
 

Other myositis mimics

In addition to these common myositis mimics, certain other neurologic diseases (such as ALS and cervical myelopathy), endocrinopathies (such as hypothyroidism), and infections (like toxoplasmosis) can also be mistaken for myositis, Dr. Christopher-Stine said, noting that cases illustrating these mimics underscore the need for careful consideration of possible alternate diagnoses.

“While most noninflammatory myopathies are self-limited or have no therapies available, knowing the diagnosis can be helpful for genetic counseling of the patient and family, for mitigating risk factors, and for precluding the use of unwarranted immunosuppressive agents,” she said.

Dr. Christopher-Stine reported having intellectual property interest in a novel Inova Diagnostics autoantibody assay detection for anti-HMGCR. She was also the safety officer for the JBT-101 Trial sponsored by Corbus and funded by the National Institutes of Health.

[email protected]

The high cost of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy largely limits its use to the sickest patients and prohibits experimentation in “less-diseased” populations, outcomes data suggest.

For that reason, and because bone marrow units are profit centers and CAR T-cell therapy reimbursement remains problematic, CAR T in the United States is “effectively being used as a bridge to transplant” – at a cost of more than $1 million per dose, economist Duane Schulthess told attendees at a recent, first-of-its-kind joint European CAR T-cell meeting in Paris, which was cosponsored by the European Hematology Association (EHA) and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

“This is the way clinical practice is evolving right now; the price is not allowing enough experimentation for CAR T to flow up and be used in the less-diseased population,” said Mr. Schulthess, managing director of Vital Transformation, a consulting company based in Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium.

In Europe, there is a slightly different problem in that health technology assessment bodies (HTAs) “have to figure out what they want to do” given the 2018 approvals of the first CAR T therapies there, he said, explaining that the data he presented was from a study commissioned by the Dutch government to help determine “what [CAR T] looks like from an effectiveness standpoint while they’re trying to figure out how much it’s worth and what they should pay.”

“Increasingly these are the big issues,” Mr. Schulthess said.

In August, the European Commission approved tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) on the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency. Kymriah was approved for pediatric and young adult patients up to age 25 years with refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse after transplant or in second or later relapse, as well as for adults patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after failing at least two lines of systemic therapy, and Yescarta was approved for the latter and for the treatment of primary refractory mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy.

The approvals have researchers and clinicians there clamoring for information about the therapy, which is revolutionizing the field of hematologic malignancies, according to Christian Chabannon, MD, PhD, chair of the EBMT Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party and vice-chair of the EBMT Scientific Council.

“An increasing number of European institutions are starting to administer this new category of medicinal products and increasingly contribute to ongoing clinical protocols and preclinical studies,” Dr. Chabannon said in an interview, explaining the urgency in planning the 1st European CAR T Cell Meeting just 6 months after the CAR T approvals in Europe.

EHA and EBMT brought together patient advocates, young investigators, and experts from across the globe to present the latest relevant information and data on topics ranging from current trials and experience, CAR T implementation and management, the preclinical and clinical pipelines, various CAR T applications, industry perspectives, and relevant economic issues, he said.

The latter is where Mr. Schulthess came in.

His research involved patient-level treatment pathway data from a database of more than 3 million patients treated with either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) or CAR T therapy across 5 years of experience. The data showed up to 85% response rates for each in the first-line setting. He and his colleagues then looked at therapy choices for those who failed to respond to second-line therapies and at how decisions were made regarding transplant and CAR T therapy – and specifically whether CAR T can be a substitute for transplant.

Ultimately, they looked at 29 allo-HCT recipients and 14 CAR T therapy recipients for a head-to-head comparison of the two treatments and performed an in-depth cost-efficacy analysis using a novel “visual pathology” methodology to account for limitations in the data.

The 3-year relapse-free survival probability was nearly 68% in the transplant recipients and 46% with CAR T.

“Now why is that? [Because] ... these populations are not the same; the CAR T population has a much higher disease burden,” Mr. Schulthess said. “So what we’re seeing [among] actual clinical doctors doing this for real – they are defaulting to bone marrow transplants, except in those cases where they do not have enough time or the patient does not respond. Then and only then are they giving CAR T.”

And that comes back to the fact that bone marrow units make money, he said.

CAR T is costly, and reimbursement can be problematic; these are disincentives for doctors to use CAR T therapy, at least in the United States, and while this is currently “being worked out,” the choice more often is “giving bone marrow transplant first and seeing what happens,” Mr. Schulthess said.

In Europe, that creates “a tough choice” for the HTAs, he said, noting that, in the absence of evidence of CAR T being curative in the subpopulation of patients with high disease burden who fail transplant and given the high cost, there is a push to determine at what point it begins to make sense economically.

“We think that you gain efficiency at ... roughly $277,000 [per dose] because [at that cost] you can do more CAR Ts than you can do bone marrow transplants. [CAR T] is less invasive, it’s lighter touch, it’s more efficient,” he said. “So if we were to see an efficiency cost of between $222,000 and $277,000, we think that works.”

Another recent study came to similar conclusions based on quality assessments, he said (J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.0642).

“We think that’s where this is going to end up, so we think that, if someone starts producing this for a couple hundred thousand bucks, then – certainly in Europe – it will make sense for this to start drifting up and being used as a substitute [to transplant],” he added.

Mr. Schulthess was one of scores of experts and investigators who presented at the EHA/EBMT joint meeting, which included numerous U.S. pioneers in the field and young European investigators, among others, Dr. Chabannon said.

Attesting to the enthusiasm in Europe regarding CAR T, Dr. Chabannon said that there were “more requests for registration than the venue could safely accommodate, a long waiting list, and a high number of individuals on the waiting list who registered for the live streaming” of the event.

“The field of CAR T cells is growing at a fast pace since the first clinical successes reported in the early 2010s, and one can wonder whether the expectations are not in excess of what reality will deliver,” he said. “Nevertheless, CAR T cells represent an essential innovation, not an incremental progress in biomedical sciences. They combine new mechanisms of action, clinical activity in advanced malignancies (and possibly beyond the field of cancer), transfer of manufacturing of human cell-based therapeutics to the industry, and potentially the first commercial success for a gene therapy.”

Surveys conducted by various professional associations, including EBMT, have clearly identified the potential for clinical successes that CAR T cells represent and the tremendous challenges raised by these innovations, he said, noting that “these include fulfilling specific educational needs.”

Therefore, EBMT and EHA have already announced that a second edition of the meeting is planned for Jan. 30 – Feb. 1, 2020, he noted.

Mr. Schulthess reported that his research was funded by the Dutch government.

[email protected]

The high cost of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy largely limits its use to the sickest patients and prohibits experimentation in “less-diseased” populations, outcomes data suggest.

For that reason, and because bone marrow units are profit centers and CAR T-cell therapy reimbursement remains problematic, CAR T in the United States is “effectively being used as a bridge to transplant” – at a cost of more than $1 million per dose, economist Duane Schulthess told attendees at a recent, first-of-its-kind joint European CAR T-cell meeting in Paris, which was cosponsored by the European Hematology Association (EHA) and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

“This is the way clinical practice is evolving right now; the price is not allowing enough experimentation for CAR T to flow up and be used in the less-diseased population,” said Mr. Schulthess, managing director of Vital Transformation, a consulting company based in Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium.

In Europe, there is a slightly different problem in that health technology assessment bodies (HTAs) “have to figure out what they want to do” given the 2018 approvals of the first CAR T therapies there, he said, explaining that the data he presented was from a study commissioned by the Dutch government to help determine “what [CAR T] looks like from an effectiveness standpoint while they’re trying to figure out how much it’s worth and what they should pay.”

“Increasingly these are the big issues,” Mr. Schulthess said.

In August, the European Commission approved tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) on the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency. Kymriah was approved for pediatric and young adult patients up to age 25 years with refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse after transplant or in second or later relapse, as well as for adults patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after failing at least two lines of systemic therapy, and Yescarta was approved for the latter and for the treatment of primary refractory mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy.

The approvals have researchers and clinicians there clamoring for information about the therapy, which is revolutionizing the field of hematologic malignancies, according to Christian Chabannon, MD, PhD, chair of the EBMT Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party and vice-chair of the EBMT Scientific Council.

“An increasing number of European institutions are starting to administer this new category of medicinal products and increasingly contribute to ongoing clinical protocols and preclinical studies,” Dr. Chabannon said in an interview, explaining the urgency in planning the 1st European CAR T Cell Meeting just 6 months after the CAR T approvals in Europe.

EHA and EBMT brought together patient advocates, young investigators, and experts from across the globe to present the latest relevant information and data on topics ranging from current trials and experience, CAR T implementation and management, the preclinical and clinical pipelines, various CAR T applications, industry perspectives, and relevant economic issues, he said.

The latter is where Mr. Schulthess came in.

His research involved patient-level treatment pathway data from a database of more than 3 million patients treated with either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) or CAR T therapy across 5 years of experience. The data showed up to 85% response rates for each in the first-line setting. He and his colleagues then looked at therapy choices for those who failed to respond to second-line therapies and at how decisions were made regarding transplant and CAR T therapy – and specifically whether CAR T can be a substitute for transplant.

Ultimately, they looked at 29 allo-HCT recipients and 14 CAR T therapy recipients for a head-to-head comparison of the two treatments and performed an in-depth cost-efficacy analysis using a novel “visual pathology” methodology to account for limitations in the data.

The 3-year relapse-free survival probability was nearly 68% in the transplant recipients and 46% with CAR T.

“Now why is that? [Because] ... these populations are not the same; the CAR T population has a much higher disease burden,” Mr. Schulthess said. “So what we’re seeing [among] actual clinical doctors doing this for real – they are defaulting to bone marrow transplants, except in those cases where they do not have enough time or the patient does not respond. Then and only then are they giving CAR T.”

And that comes back to the fact that bone marrow units make money, he said.

CAR T is costly, and reimbursement can be problematic; these are disincentives for doctors to use CAR T therapy, at least in the United States, and while this is currently “being worked out,” the choice more often is “giving bone marrow transplant first and seeing what happens,” Mr. Schulthess said.

In Europe, that creates “a tough choice” for the HTAs, he said, noting that, in the absence of evidence of CAR T being curative in the subpopulation of patients with high disease burden who fail transplant and given the high cost, there is a push to determine at what point it begins to make sense economically.

“We think that you gain efficiency at ... roughly $277,000 [per dose] because [at that cost] you can do more CAR Ts than you can do bone marrow transplants. [CAR T] is less invasive, it’s lighter touch, it’s more efficient,” he said. “So if we were to see an efficiency cost of between $222,000 and $277,000, we think that works.”

Another recent study came to similar conclusions based on quality assessments, he said (J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.0642).

“We think that’s where this is going to end up, so we think that, if someone starts producing this for a couple hundred thousand bucks, then – certainly in Europe – it will make sense for this to start drifting up and being used as a substitute [to transplant],” he added.

Mr. Schulthess was one of scores of experts and investigators who presented at the EHA/EBMT joint meeting, which included numerous U.S. pioneers in the field and young European investigators, among others, Dr. Chabannon said.

Attesting to the enthusiasm in Europe regarding CAR T, Dr. Chabannon said that there were “more requests for registration than the venue could safely accommodate, a long waiting list, and a high number of individuals on the waiting list who registered for the live streaming” of the event.

“The field of CAR T cells is growing at a fast pace since the first clinical successes reported in the early 2010s, and one can wonder whether the expectations are not in excess of what reality will deliver,” he said. “Nevertheless, CAR T cells represent an essential innovation, not an incremental progress in biomedical sciences. They combine new mechanisms of action, clinical activity in advanced malignancies (and possibly beyond the field of cancer), transfer of manufacturing of human cell-based therapeutics to the industry, and potentially the first commercial success for a gene therapy.”

Surveys conducted by various professional associations, including EBMT, have clearly identified the potential for clinical successes that CAR T cells represent and the tremendous challenges raised by these innovations, he said, noting that “these include fulfilling specific educational needs.”

Therefore, EBMT and EHA have already announced that a second edition of the meeting is planned for Jan. 30 – Feb. 1, 2020, he noted.

Mr. Schulthess reported that his research was funded by the Dutch government.

[email protected]

The high cost of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy largely limits its use to the sickest patients and prohibits experimentation in “less-diseased” populations, outcomes data suggest.

For that reason, and because bone marrow units are profit centers and CAR T-cell therapy reimbursement remains problematic, CAR T in the United States is “effectively being used as a bridge to transplant” – at a cost of more than $1 million per dose, economist Duane Schulthess told attendees at a recent, first-of-its-kind joint European CAR T-cell meeting in Paris, which was cosponsored by the European Hematology Association (EHA) and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).

“This is the way clinical practice is evolving right now; the price is not allowing enough experimentation for CAR T to flow up and be used in the less-diseased population,” said Mr. Schulthess, managing director of Vital Transformation, a consulting company based in Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium.

In Europe, there is a slightly different problem in that health technology assessment bodies (HTAs) “have to figure out what they want to do” given the 2018 approvals of the first CAR T therapies there, he said, explaining that the data he presented was from a study commissioned by the Dutch government to help determine “what [CAR T] looks like from an effectiveness standpoint while they’re trying to figure out how much it’s worth and what they should pay.”

“Increasingly these are the big issues,” Mr. Schulthess said.

In August, the European Commission approved tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta) on the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency. Kymriah was approved for pediatric and young adult patients up to age 25 years with refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in relapse after transplant or in second or later relapse, as well as for adults patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after failing at least two lines of systemic therapy, and Yescarta was approved for the latter and for the treatment of primary refractory mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy.

The approvals have researchers and clinicians there clamoring for information about the therapy, which is revolutionizing the field of hematologic malignancies, according to Christian Chabannon, MD, PhD, chair of the EBMT Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party and vice-chair of the EBMT Scientific Council.

“An increasing number of European institutions are starting to administer this new category of medicinal products and increasingly contribute to ongoing clinical protocols and preclinical studies,” Dr. Chabannon said in an interview, explaining the urgency in planning the 1st European CAR T Cell Meeting just 6 months after the CAR T approvals in Europe.

EHA and EBMT brought together patient advocates, young investigators, and experts from across the globe to present the latest relevant information and data on topics ranging from current trials and experience, CAR T implementation and management, the preclinical and clinical pipelines, various CAR T applications, industry perspectives, and relevant economic issues, he said.

The latter is where Mr. Schulthess came in.

His research involved patient-level treatment pathway data from a database of more than 3 million patients treated with either allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) or CAR T therapy across 5 years of experience. The data showed up to 85% response rates for each in the first-line setting. He and his colleagues then looked at therapy choices for those who failed to respond to second-line therapies and at how decisions were made regarding transplant and CAR T therapy – and specifically whether CAR T can be a substitute for transplant.

Ultimately, they looked at 29 allo-HCT recipients and 14 CAR T therapy recipients for a head-to-head comparison of the two treatments and performed an in-depth cost-efficacy analysis using a novel “visual pathology” methodology to account for limitations in the data.

The 3-year relapse-free survival probability was nearly 68% in the transplant recipients and 46% with CAR T.

“Now why is that? [Because] ... these populations are not the same; the CAR T population has a much higher disease burden,” Mr. Schulthess said. “So what we’re seeing [among] actual clinical doctors doing this for real – they are defaulting to bone marrow transplants, except in those cases where they do not have enough time or the patient does not respond. Then and only then are they giving CAR T.”

And that comes back to the fact that bone marrow units make money, he said.

CAR T is costly, and reimbursement can be problematic; these are disincentives for doctors to use CAR T therapy, at least in the United States, and while this is currently “being worked out,” the choice more often is “giving bone marrow transplant first and seeing what happens,” Mr. Schulthess said.

In Europe, that creates “a tough choice” for the HTAs, he said, noting that, in the absence of evidence of CAR T being curative in the subpopulation of patients with high disease burden who fail transplant and given the high cost, there is a push to determine at what point it begins to make sense economically.

“We think that you gain efficiency at ... roughly $277,000 [per dose] because [at that cost] you can do more CAR Ts than you can do bone marrow transplants. [CAR T] is less invasive, it’s lighter touch, it’s more efficient,” he said. “So if we were to see an efficiency cost of between $222,000 and $277,000, we think that works.”

Another recent study came to similar conclusions based on quality assessments, he said (J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.0642).

“We think that’s where this is going to end up, so we think that, if someone starts producing this for a couple hundred thousand bucks, then – certainly in Europe – it will make sense for this to start drifting up and being used as a substitute [to transplant],” he added.

Mr. Schulthess was one of scores of experts and investigators who presented at the EHA/EBMT joint meeting, which included numerous U.S. pioneers in the field and young European investigators, among others, Dr. Chabannon said.

Attesting to the enthusiasm in Europe regarding CAR T, Dr. Chabannon said that there were “more requests for registration than the venue could safely accommodate, a long waiting list, and a high number of individuals on the waiting list who registered for the live streaming” of the event.

“The field of CAR T cells is growing at a fast pace since the first clinical successes reported in the early 2010s, and one can wonder whether the expectations are not in excess of what reality will deliver,” he said. “Nevertheless, CAR T cells represent an essential innovation, not an incremental progress in biomedical sciences. They combine new mechanisms of action, clinical activity in advanced malignancies (and possibly beyond the field of cancer), transfer of manufacturing of human cell-based therapeutics to the industry, and potentially the first commercial success for a gene therapy.”

Surveys conducted by various professional associations, including EBMT, have clearly identified the potential for clinical successes that CAR T cells represent and the tremendous challenges raised by these innovations, he said, noting that “these include fulfilling specific educational needs.”

Therefore, EBMT and EHA have already announced that a second edition of the meeting is planned for Jan. 30 – Feb. 1, 2020, he noted.

Mr. Schulthess reported that his research was funded by the Dutch government.

[email protected]

DALLAS – The rate of spinal cord atrophy at the C1 level is promising as a prognostic biomarker for the future conversion to secondary progressive disease in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), results from a novel, single-center study suggest.

“Among all magnetic resonance imaging measures, spinal cord area shows the strongest correlations with MS disability and has been shown to discriminate progressive from relapsing remitting disease subtypes,” lead study author Antje Bischof, MD, said in an interview in advance of the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. “In our work, we used a novel method to accurately measure upper cervical cord area at C1 vertebral level from brain MRI. This enabled us to show for the first time that spinal cord atrophy rates are faster in relapsing remitting MS patients who later converted to secondary progressive disease, compared to a matched group of patients who remained relapsing remitting MS over 2 decades.”


Dr. Bischof, a postdoctoral research fellow in the department of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues matched 54 RRMS patients who converted to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) during the 12-year observation period with 54 RRMS patients who remained RRMS during the observation period, based on demographic and clinical criteria. Additionally, they evaluated 54 age- and sex-matched healthy controls at baseline. From routine T1-weighted brain MRI, they analyzed brain measures and spinal cord area at C1 level over 12 years to evaluate their potential to discriminate between the two matched groups during the preconversion period.

Subjects who developed SPMS showed higher rates of spinal cord atrophy (–2.2% per year; standard error, 0.2) before conversion to a secondary progressive course, compared with their RRMS matches who did not convert to SPMS (–0.7% per year; SE, 0.2; P less than .0001). Their data suggest that this difference exists at least 4 years before conversion to SPMS. “None of the commonly used measures of the brain including global brain volumes like white matter and gray matter, regional brain volumes like thalamus, and MS lesion volumes, discriminated between the patients with relapsing remitting MS who later converted to secondary progressive disease and the patients who remained RRMS,” Dr. Bischof said.

She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the small sample size and the fact that the results require confirmation in a second MS cohort in order to be generalizable. “These results suggest cervical cord atrophy rate at C1 level as a prognostic biomarker for the conversion to secondary progressive MS and could be useful for treatment decisions early in the disease course, and for the study of genetic, epidemiologic, and immune variables in MS,” Dr. Bischof concluded.

She reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Bischof A et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2019, Abstract P157.

DALLAS – The rate of spinal cord atrophy at the C1 level is promising as a prognostic biomarker for the future conversion to secondary progressive disease in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), results from a novel, single-center study suggest.

“Among all magnetic resonance imaging measures, spinal cord area shows the strongest correlations with MS disability and has been shown to discriminate progressive from relapsing remitting disease subtypes,” lead study author Antje Bischof, MD, said in an interview in advance of the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. “In our work, we used a novel method to accurately measure upper cervical cord area at C1 vertebral level from brain MRI. This enabled us to show for the first time that spinal cord atrophy rates are faster in relapsing remitting MS patients who later converted to secondary progressive disease, compared to a matched group of patients who remained relapsing remitting MS over 2 decades.”


Dr. Bischof, a postdoctoral research fellow in the department of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues matched 54 RRMS patients who converted to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) during the 12-year observation period with 54 RRMS patients who remained RRMS during the observation period, based on demographic and clinical criteria. Additionally, they evaluated 54 age- and sex-matched healthy controls at baseline. From routine T1-weighted brain MRI, they analyzed brain measures and spinal cord area at C1 level over 12 years to evaluate their potential to discriminate between the two matched groups during the preconversion period.

Subjects who developed SPMS showed higher rates of spinal cord atrophy (–2.2% per year; standard error, 0.2) before conversion to a secondary progressive course, compared with their RRMS matches who did not convert to SPMS (–0.7% per year; SE, 0.2; P less than .0001). Their data suggest that this difference exists at least 4 years before conversion to SPMS. “None of the commonly used measures of the brain including global brain volumes like white matter and gray matter, regional brain volumes like thalamus, and MS lesion volumes, discriminated between the patients with relapsing remitting MS who later converted to secondary progressive disease and the patients who remained RRMS,” Dr. Bischof said.

She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the small sample size and the fact that the results require confirmation in a second MS cohort in order to be generalizable. “These results suggest cervical cord atrophy rate at C1 level as a prognostic biomarker for the conversion to secondary progressive MS and could be useful for treatment decisions early in the disease course, and for the study of genetic, epidemiologic, and immune variables in MS,” Dr. Bischof concluded.

She reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Bischof A et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2019, Abstract P157.

DALLAS – The rate of spinal cord atrophy at the C1 level is promising as a prognostic biomarker for the future conversion to secondary progressive disease in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), results from a novel, single-center study suggest.

“Among all magnetic resonance imaging measures, spinal cord area shows the strongest correlations with MS disability and has been shown to discriminate progressive from relapsing remitting disease subtypes,” lead study author Antje Bischof, MD, said in an interview in advance of the meeting held by the Americas Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis. “In our work, we used a novel method to accurately measure upper cervical cord area at C1 vertebral level from brain MRI. This enabled us to show for the first time that spinal cord atrophy rates are faster in relapsing remitting MS patients who later converted to secondary progressive disease, compared to a matched group of patients who remained relapsing remitting MS over 2 decades.”


Dr. Bischof, a postdoctoral research fellow in the department of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleagues matched 54 RRMS patients who converted to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) during the 12-year observation period with 54 RRMS patients who remained RRMS during the observation period, based on demographic and clinical criteria. Additionally, they evaluated 54 age- and sex-matched healthy controls at baseline. From routine T1-weighted brain MRI, they analyzed brain measures and spinal cord area at C1 level over 12 years to evaluate their potential to discriminate between the two matched groups during the preconversion period.

Subjects who developed SPMS showed higher rates of spinal cord atrophy (–2.2% per year; standard error, 0.2) before conversion to a secondary progressive course, compared with their RRMS matches who did not convert to SPMS (–0.7% per year; SE, 0.2; P less than .0001). Their data suggest that this difference exists at least 4 years before conversion to SPMS. “None of the commonly used measures of the brain including global brain volumes like white matter and gray matter, regional brain volumes like thalamus, and MS lesion volumes, discriminated between the patients with relapsing remitting MS who later converted to secondary progressive disease and the patients who remained RRMS,” Dr. Bischof said.

She acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including the small sample size and the fact that the results require confirmation in a second MS cohort in order to be generalizable. “These results suggest cervical cord atrophy rate at C1 level as a prognostic biomarker for the conversion to secondary progressive MS and could be useful for treatment decisions early in the disease course, and for the study of genetic, epidemiologic, and immune variables in MS,” Dr. Bischof concluded.

She reported having no financial disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Bischof A et al. ACTRIMS Forum 2019, Abstract P157.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab – trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk (Herceptin Hylecta) – for the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Approval of the subcutaneous formulation is based on results from two clinical studies in HER2-positive early breast cancer – HannaH and SafeHER, the FDA said in a press release.

In the phase 3 HannaH study (NCT00950300), researchers compared neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk with intravenous trastuzumab, both in combination with chemotherapy. Trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk proved noninferior to intravenous trastuzumab in this trial (Lancet Oncol. 2012 Sep;13[9]:869-78).

In the phase 3 SafeHER study (NCT01566721), the safety profile of trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk was deemed consistent with the known safety profiles of intravenous trastuzumab and trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk (Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:237-246).

The most common adverse reactions observed in patients receiving the subcutaneous formulation were fatigue, arthralgia, diarrhea, injection-site reaction, upper respiratory tract infection, rash, myalgia, nausea, headache, edema, flushing, pyrexia, cough, and pain in extremity, the FDA said.

Trastuzumab plus hyaluronidase-oysk was approved with a black box warning detailing the risk of cardiomyopathy, pulmonary toxicity, and embryo-fetal toxicity associated with the product.

The recommended dose is 600 mg/10,000 units (600 mg trastuzumab and 10,000 units hyaluronidase) administered subcutaneously over approximately 2-5 minutes once every 3 weeks.

Additional details can be found in the prescribing information.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab – trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk (Herceptin Hylecta) – for the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Approval of the subcutaneous formulation is based on results from two clinical studies in HER2-positive early breast cancer – HannaH and SafeHER, the FDA said in a press release.

In the phase 3 HannaH study (NCT00950300), researchers compared neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk with intravenous trastuzumab, both in combination with chemotherapy. Trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk proved noninferior to intravenous trastuzumab in this trial (Lancet Oncol. 2012 Sep;13[9]:869-78).

In the phase 3 SafeHER study (NCT01566721), the safety profile of trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk was deemed consistent with the known safety profiles of intravenous trastuzumab and trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk (Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:237-246).

The most common adverse reactions observed in patients receiving the subcutaneous formulation were fatigue, arthralgia, diarrhea, injection-site reaction, upper respiratory tract infection, rash, myalgia, nausea, headache, edema, flushing, pyrexia, cough, and pain in extremity, the FDA said.

Trastuzumab plus hyaluronidase-oysk was approved with a black box warning detailing the risk of cardiomyopathy, pulmonary toxicity, and embryo-fetal toxicity associated with the product.

The recommended dose is 600 mg/10,000 units (600 mg trastuzumab and 10,000 units hyaluronidase) administered subcutaneously over approximately 2-5 minutes once every 3 weeks.

Additional details can be found in the prescribing information.

The Food and Drug Administration has approved a subcutaneous formulation of trastuzumab – trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk (Herceptin Hylecta) – for the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.

Approval of the subcutaneous formulation is based on results from two clinical studies in HER2-positive early breast cancer – HannaH and SafeHER, the FDA said in a press release.

In the phase 3 HannaH study (NCT00950300), researchers compared neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk with intravenous trastuzumab, both in combination with chemotherapy. Trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk proved noninferior to intravenous trastuzumab in this trial (Lancet Oncol. 2012 Sep;13[9]:869-78).

In the phase 3 SafeHER study (NCT01566721), the safety profile of trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk was deemed consistent with the known safety profiles of intravenous trastuzumab and trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk (Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;82:237-246).

The most common adverse reactions observed in patients receiving the subcutaneous formulation were fatigue, arthralgia, diarrhea, injection-site reaction, upper respiratory tract infection, rash, myalgia, nausea, headache, edema, flushing, pyrexia, cough, and pain in extremity, the FDA said.

Trastuzumab plus hyaluronidase-oysk was approved with a black box warning detailing the risk of cardiomyopathy, pulmonary toxicity, and embryo-fetal toxicity associated with the product.

The recommended dose is 600 mg/10,000 units (600 mg trastuzumab and 10,000 units hyaluronidase) administered subcutaneously over approximately 2-5 minutes once every 3 weeks.

Additional details can be found in the prescribing information.

Delaying or withholding antibiotics in elderly patients with a urinary tract infection (UTI) increases the risk of sepsis and death, results of a large, population-based study suggest.

andresr/Getty Images

The risk of bloodstream infection was more than seven times greater in patients who did not receive antibiotics immediately after seeing a general practitioner for a UTI versus those who did, according to results of the study based on primary care records and other data for nearly 160,000 U.K. patients aged 65 years or older. Death rates and hospital admissions were significantly higher for these patients, according to the study published in The BMJ by Myriam Gharbi, PharmD, Phd, Imperial College London, and her colleagues.

The publication of these findings coincides with an increase in Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in England.

“Our study suggests the early initiation of antibiotics for UTI in older high risk adult populations (especially men aged [older than] 85 years) should be recommended to prevent serious complications,” Dr. Gharbi and her coauthors said in their report.

The population-based cohort study comprised 157,264 adult primary care patients at least 65 years of age who had one or more suspected or confirmed lower UTIs from November 2007 to May 2015. The researchers found that health care providers had diagnosed a total of 312,896 UTI episodes in these patients during the period they studied. In 7.2% (22,534) of the UTI episodes, the researchers were unable to find records of the patients having been prescribed antibiotics by a general practitioner within 7 days of the UTI diagnosis. These 22,534 episodes included those that occurred in patients who had a complication before an antibiotic was prescribed. An additional 6.2% (19,292) of the episodes occurred in patients who were prescribed antibiotics, but not during their first UTI-related visit to a general practitioner or on the same day of such a visit. The researchers classified this group of patients as having been prescribed antibiotics on a deferred or delayed basis, as they were not prescribed such drugs within 7 days of their visit.

Overall, there were 1,539 cases (0.5% of the total number of UTIs) of bloodstream infection within 60 days of the initial urinary tract infection diagnosis, the researchers reported.

The bloodstream infection rate was 2.9% for patients who were not prescribed antibiotics ever or prior to an infection occurring, 2.2% in those who were prescribed antibiotics on a deferred basis, and 0.2% in those who were prescribed antibiotics immediately, meaning during their first visit to a general practitioner for a UTI or on the same day of such a visit (P less than .001). After adjustment for potential confounding variables such as age, sex, and region, the patients classified as having not been prescribed antibiotics or having been prescribed antibiotics on a deferred basis were significantly more likely to have a bloodstream infection within 60 days of their visit to a health care provider, compared with those who received antibiotics immediately, with odds ratios of 8.08 (95% confidence interval, 7.12-9.16) and 7.12 (95% CI, 6.22-8.14), respectively.

Hospital admissions after a UTI episode were nearly twice as high in the no- or deferred-antibiotics groups (27.0% and 26.8%, respectively), compared with the group that received antibiotics right away (14.8%), the investigators reported. The lengths of hospital stays were 12.1 days for the group classified as having not been prescribed antibiotics, 7.7 days for the group subject to delayed antibiotic prescribing, and 6.3 days for the group who received antibiotics immediately.

Deaths within 60 days of experiencing a urinary tract infection occurred in 5.4% of patients in the no-antibiotics group, 2.8% of the deferred-antibiotics group, and 1.6% of the immediate-antibiotics group. After adjustment for covariates, a regression analysis showed the risks for all-cause mortality were 1.16 and 2.18 times higher in the deferred-antibiotics group and the no-antibiotics group, respectively, according to the paper.

In the immediate-antibiotics group, those patients who received nitrofurantoin had a “small but significant increase” in 60-day survival versus those who received trimethoprim, the investigators noted in the discussion section of their report.

“This increase could reflect either higher levels of resistance to trimethoprim or a healthier population treated with nitrofurantoin, the latest being not recommended for patients with poor kidney function,” the researchers wrote.

This study was supported by the National Institute for Health Research and other U.K. sources. One study coauthor reported working as an epidemiologist with GSK in areas not related to the study.

SOURCE: Gharbi M et al. BMJ. 2019 Feb 27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l525.

Delaying or withholding antibiotics in elderly patients with a urinary tract infection (UTI) increases the risk of sepsis and death, results of a large, population-based study suggest.

andresr/Getty Images

The risk of bloodstream infection was more than seven times greater in patients who did not receive antibiotics immediately after seeing a general practitioner for a UTI versus those who did, according to results of the study based on primary care records and other data for nearly 160,000 U.K. patients aged 65 years or older. Death rates and hospital admissions were significantly higher for these patients, according to the study published in The BMJ by Myriam Gharbi, PharmD, Phd, Imperial College London, and her colleagues.

The publication of these findings coincides with an increase in Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in England.

“Our study suggests the early initiation of antibiotics for UTI in older high risk adult populations (especially men aged [older than] 85 years) should be recommended to prevent serious complications,” Dr. Gharbi and her coauthors said in their report.

The population-based cohort study comprised 157,264 adult primary care patients at least 65 years of age who had one or more suspected or confirmed lower UTIs from November 2007 to May 2015. The researchers found that health care providers had diagnosed a total of 312,896 UTI episodes in these patients during the period they studied. In 7.2% (22,534) of the UTI episodes, the researchers were unable to find records of the patients having been prescribed antibiotics by a general practitioner within 7 days of the UTI diagnosis. These 22,534 episodes included those that occurred in patients who had a complication before an antibiotic was prescribed. An additional 6.2% (19,292) of the episodes occurred in patients who were prescribed antibiotics, but not during their first UTI-related visit to a general practitioner or on the same day of such a visit. The researchers classified this group of patients as having been prescribed antibiotics on a deferred or delayed basis, as they were not prescribed such drugs within 7 days of their visit.

Overall, there were 1,539 cases (0.5% of the total number of UTIs) of bloodstream infection within 60 days of the initial urinary tract infection diagnosis, the researchers reported.

The bloodstream infection rate was 2.9% for patients who were not prescribed antibiotics ever or prior to an infection occurring, 2.2% in those who were prescribed antibiotics on a deferred basis, and 0.2% in those who were prescribed antibiotics immediately, meaning during their first visit to a general practitioner for a UTI or on the same day of such a visit (P less than .001). After adjustment for potential confounding variables such as age, sex, and region, the patients classified as having not been prescribed antibiotics or having been prescribed antibiotics on a deferred basis were significantly more likely to have a bloodstream infection within 60 days of their visit to a health care provider, compared with those who received antibiotics immediately, with odds ratios of 8.08 (95% confidence interval, 7.12-9.16) and 7.12 (95% CI, 6.22-8.14), respectively.

Hospital admissions after a UTI episode were nearly twice as high in the no- or deferred-antibiotics groups (27.0% and 26.8%, respectively), compared with the group that received antibiotics right away (14.8%), the investigators reported. The lengths of hospital stays were 12.1 days for the group classified as having not been prescribed antibiotics, 7.7 days for the group subject to delayed antibiotic prescribing, and 6.3 days for the group who received antibiotics immediately.

Deaths within 60 days of experiencing a urinary tract infection occurred in 5.4% of patients in the no-antibiotics group, 2.8% of the deferred-antibiotics group, and 1.6% of the immediate-antibiotics group. After adjustment for covariates, a regression analysis showed the risks for all-cause mortality were 1.16 and 2.18 times higher in the deferred-antibiotics group and the no-antibiotics group, respectively, according to the paper.

In the immediate-antibiotics group, those patients who received nitrofurantoin had a “small but significant increase” in 60-day survival versus those who received trimethoprim, the investigators noted in the discussion section of their report.

“This increase could reflect either higher levels of resistance to trimethoprim or a healthier population treated with nitrofurantoin, the latest being not recommended for patients with poor kidney function,” the researchers wrote.

This study was supported by the National Institute for Health Research and other U.K. sources. One study coauthor reported working as an epidemiologist with GSK in areas not related to the study.

SOURCE: Gharbi M et al. BMJ. 2019 Feb 27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l525.

Delaying or withholding antibiotics in elderly patients with a urinary tract infection (UTI) increases the risk of sepsis and death, results of a large, population-based study suggest.

andresr/Getty Images

The risk of bloodstream infection was more than seven times greater in patients who did not receive antibiotics immediately after seeing a general practitioner for a UTI versus those who did, according to results of the study based on primary care records and other data for nearly 160,000 U.K. patients aged 65 years or older. Death rates and hospital admissions were significantly higher for these patients, according to the study published in The BMJ by Myriam Gharbi, PharmD, Phd, Imperial College London, and her colleagues.

The publication of these findings coincides with an increase in Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in England.

“Our study suggests the early initiation of antibiotics for UTI in older high risk adult populations (especially men aged [older than] 85 years) should be recommended to prevent serious complications,” Dr. Gharbi and her coauthors said in their report.

The population-based cohort study comprised 157,264 adult primary care patients at least 65 years of age who had one or more suspected or confirmed lower UTIs from November 2007 to May 2015. The researchers found that health care providers had diagnosed a total of 312,896 UTI episodes in these patients during the period they studied. In 7.2% (22,534) of the UTI episodes, the researchers were unable to find records of the patients having been prescribed antibiotics by a general practitioner within 7 days of the UTI diagnosis. These 22,534 episodes included those that occurred in patients who had a complication before an antibiotic was prescribed. An additional 6.2% (19,292) of the episodes occurred in patients who were prescribed antibiotics, but not during their first UTI-related visit to a general practitioner or on the same day of such a visit. The researchers classified this group of patients as having been prescribed antibiotics on a deferred or delayed basis, as they were not prescribed such drugs within 7 days of their visit.

Overall, there were 1,539 cases (0.5% of the total number of UTIs) of bloodstream infection within 60 days of the initial urinary tract infection diagnosis, the researchers reported.

The bloodstream infection rate was 2.9% for patients who were not prescribed antibiotics ever or prior to an infection occurring, 2.2% in those who were prescribed antibiotics on a deferred basis, and 0.2% in those who were prescribed antibiotics immediately, meaning during their first visit to a general practitioner for a UTI or on the same day of such a visit (P less than .001). After adjustment for potential confounding variables such as age, sex, and region, the patients classified as having not been prescribed antibiotics or having been prescribed antibiotics on a deferred basis were significantly more likely to have a bloodstream infection within 60 days of their visit to a health care provider, compared with those who received antibiotics immediately, with odds ratios of 8.08 (95% confidence interval, 7.12-9.16) and 7.12 (95% CI, 6.22-8.14), respectively.

Hospital admissions after a UTI episode were nearly twice as high in the no- or deferred-antibiotics groups (27.0% and 26.8%, respectively), compared with the group that received antibiotics right away (14.8%), the investigators reported. The lengths of hospital stays were 12.1 days for the group classified as having not been prescribed antibiotics, 7.7 days for the group subject to delayed antibiotic prescribing, and 6.3 days for the group who received antibiotics immediately.

Deaths within 60 days of experiencing a urinary tract infection occurred in 5.4% of patients in the no-antibiotics group, 2.8% of the deferred-antibiotics group, and 1.6% of the immediate-antibiotics group. After adjustment for covariates, a regression analysis showed the risks for all-cause mortality were 1.16 and 2.18 times higher in the deferred-antibiotics group and the no-antibiotics group, respectively, according to the paper.

In the immediate-antibiotics group, those patients who received nitrofurantoin had a “small but significant increase” in 60-day survival versus those who received trimethoprim, the investigators noted in the discussion section of their report.

“This increase could reflect either higher levels of resistance to trimethoprim or a healthier population treated with nitrofurantoin, the latest being not recommended for patients with poor kidney function,” the researchers wrote.

This study was supported by the National Institute for Health Research and other U.K. sources. One study coauthor reported working as an epidemiologist with GSK in areas not related to the study.

SOURCE: Gharbi M et al. BMJ. 2019 Feb 27. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l525.

A weight-loss drug is poised for expanded indication, the FDA says a popular gout drug raises cardiovascular risk, an AHA statement targets CV risk factors in children, and a class action suit against the American Board of Internal Medicine over MOC gets financial support from doctors.

Amazon AlexaApple Podcasts

Google Podcasts

TuneIn

A weight-loss drug is poised for expanded indication, the FDA says a popular gout drug raises cardiovascular risk, an AHA statement targets CV risk factors in children, and a class action suit against the American Board of Internal Medicine over MOC gets financial support from doctors.

Amazon AlexaApple Podcasts

Google Podcasts

TuneIn

A weight-loss drug is poised for expanded indication, the FDA says a popular gout drug raises cardiovascular risk, an AHA statement targets CV risk factors in children, and a class action suit against the American Board of Internal Medicine over MOC gets financial support from doctors.

Amazon AlexaApple Podcasts

Google Podcasts

TuneIn