Key clinical point: Established and new atopic dermatitis (AD)-associated filaggrin loss-of-function variants are associated with increased risks for clinical AD outcomes and disruption of skin barrier integrity in lesional and nonlesional skin of children with AD.

Major finding: Twenty variants were identified, including one novel variant. The presence of one or more variants was associated with a higher risk for moderate or severe AD vs mild AD (odds ratio 2.00; corrected P = .0394), a higher Scoring AD score (corrected P = .0394), and transepidermal water loss in both lesional (P = .018) and nonlesional (P = .015) skin.

Study details: This study included 438 children with AD (age ≤ 2 years; gestation period ≥ 36 weeks) from the early-life Mechanisms of Progression of Atopic Dermatitis to Asthma in Children cohort without a comorbid lung condition or dependence on immunosuppression or oral steroids for a condition except asthma.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health. Matthew S. Hestand declared being an employee and shareholder of Pacific Biosciences. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Virolainen SJ, Satish L, Biagini JM, et al. Filaggrin loss-of-function variants are associated with atopic dermatitis phenotypes in a diverse, early life prospective cohort. JCI Insight. 2024 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.178258 Source

Key clinical point: Established and new atopic dermatitis (AD)-associated filaggrin loss-of-function variants are associated with increased risks for clinical AD outcomes and disruption of skin barrier integrity in lesional and nonlesional skin of children with AD.

Major finding: Twenty variants were identified, including one novel variant. The presence of one or more variants was associated with a higher risk for moderate or severe AD vs mild AD (odds ratio 2.00; corrected P = .0394), a higher Scoring AD score (corrected P = .0394), and transepidermal water loss in both lesional (P = .018) and nonlesional (P = .015) skin.

Study details: This study included 438 children with AD (age ≤ 2 years; gestation period ≥ 36 weeks) from the early-life Mechanisms of Progression of Atopic Dermatitis to Asthma in Children cohort without a comorbid lung condition or dependence on immunosuppression or oral steroids for a condition except asthma.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health. Matthew S. Hestand declared being an employee and shareholder of Pacific Biosciences. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Virolainen SJ, Satish L, Biagini JM, et al. Filaggrin loss-of-function variants are associated with atopic dermatitis phenotypes in a diverse, early life prospective cohort. JCI Insight. 2024 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.178258 Source

Key clinical point: Established and new atopic dermatitis (AD)-associated filaggrin loss-of-function variants are associated with increased risks for clinical AD outcomes and disruption of skin barrier integrity in lesional and nonlesional skin of children with AD.

Major finding: Twenty variants were identified, including one novel variant. The presence of one or more variants was associated with a higher risk for moderate or severe AD vs mild AD (odds ratio 2.00; corrected P = .0394), a higher Scoring AD score (corrected P = .0394), and transepidermal water loss in both lesional (P = .018) and nonlesional (P = .015) skin.

Study details: This study included 438 children with AD (age ≤ 2 years; gestation period ≥ 36 weeks) from the early-life Mechanisms of Progression of Atopic Dermatitis to Asthma in Children cohort without a comorbid lung condition or dependence on immunosuppression or oral steroids for a condition except asthma.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the US National Institutes of Health. Matthew S. Hestand declared being an employee and shareholder of Pacific Biosciences. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Virolainen SJ, Satish L, Biagini JM, et al. Filaggrin loss-of-function variants are associated with atopic dermatitis phenotypes in a diverse, early life prospective cohort. JCI Insight. 2024 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.178258 Source

Key clinical point: Baricitinib treatment was effective and well-tolerated in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who were followed-up for 3 months in real-world settings.

Major finding: Baricitinib led to a significant reduction in the Eczema Area Severity Index (21.5 ± 13.2 vs 9.3 ± 9.0) and objective Scoring AD (45.9 ± 12.3 vs 28.2 ± 15.5) scores at 3 months vs start visit (both P < .001). The treatment discontinuation rate was 16.7%, with two patients discontinuing baricitinib due to adverse events.

Study details: This was an interim analysis of the TREATgermany registry that included 81 adult patients with moderate to severe AD who received baricitinib and concomitant topical treatment, of whom 49 had initiated baricitinib at a registry visit; 26 of these did not switch from a previous systemic drug and had their first follow-up visit at 3 months.

Disclosures: TREATgermany is supported by AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Galderma S.A., and others. Six authors declared serving as consultants, lecturers, etc., for or having other ties with various organizations, including the sponsors of TREATgermany. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Traidl S, Heinrich L, Siegels D, et al, and the TREATgermany study group. Treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with baricitinib: Results from an interim analysis of the TREATgermany registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Mar 28). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19979 Source

Key clinical point: Baricitinib treatment was effective and well-tolerated in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who were followed-up for 3 months in real-world settings.

Major finding: Baricitinib led to a significant reduction in the Eczema Area Severity Index (21.5 ± 13.2 vs 9.3 ± 9.0) and objective Scoring AD (45.9 ± 12.3 vs 28.2 ± 15.5) scores at 3 months vs start visit (both P < .001). The treatment discontinuation rate was 16.7%, with two patients discontinuing baricitinib due to adverse events.

Study details: This was an interim analysis of the TREATgermany registry that included 81 adult patients with moderate to severe AD who received baricitinib and concomitant topical treatment, of whom 49 had initiated baricitinib at a registry visit; 26 of these did not switch from a previous systemic drug and had their first follow-up visit at 3 months.

Disclosures: TREATgermany is supported by AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Galderma S.A., and others. Six authors declared serving as consultants, lecturers, etc., for or having other ties with various organizations, including the sponsors of TREATgermany. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Traidl S, Heinrich L, Siegels D, et al, and the TREATgermany study group. Treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with baricitinib: Results from an interim analysis of the TREATgermany registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Mar 28). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19979 Source

Key clinical point: Baricitinib treatment was effective and well-tolerated in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who were followed-up for 3 months in real-world settings.

Major finding: Baricitinib led to a significant reduction in the Eczema Area Severity Index (21.5 ± 13.2 vs 9.3 ± 9.0) and objective Scoring AD (45.9 ± 12.3 vs 28.2 ± 15.5) scores at 3 months vs start visit (both P < .001). The treatment discontinuation rate was 16.7%, with two patients discontinuing baricitinib due to adverse events.

Study details: This was an interim analysis of the TREATgermany registry that included 81 adult patients with moderate to severe AD who received baricitinib and concomitant topical treatment, of whom 49 had initiated baricitinib at a registry visit; 26 of these did not switch from a previous systemic drug and had their first follow-up visit at 3 months.

Disclosures: TREATgermany is supported by AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Galderma S.A., and others. Six authors declared serving as consultants, lecturers, etc., for or having other ties with various organizations, including the sponsors of TREATgermany. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Traidl S, Heinrich L, Siegels D, et al, and the TREATgermany study group. Treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with baricitinib: Results from an interim analysis of the TREATgermany registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Mar 28). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19979 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a significantly increased risk of developing lymphoma.

Major finding: Patients with AD vs control individuals showed a significantly increased likelihood of developing noncutaneous T-cell lymphoma (odds ratio [OR] 2.52; 95% CI 1.37-4.62), with similar outcomes for the peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtype (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.50-10.66).

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 6425 adult patients with AD and 25,700 matched control individuals without AD from electronic health records.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Benjamin Ungar reported being an employee of Mount Sinai and receiving research funds from and serving as a consultant for various organizations.

Source: Powers CM, Piontkowski AJ, Orloff J, et al. Risk of lymphoma in patients with atopic dermatitis: A case-control study in the All of Us database. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 (Apr 4). doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.03.038 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a significantly increased risk of developing lymphoma.

Major finding: Patients with AD vs control individuals showed a significantly increased likelihood of developing noncutaneous T-cell lymphoma (odds ratio [OR] 2.52; 95% CI 1.37-4.62), with similar outcomes for the peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtype (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.50-10.66).

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 6425 adult patients with AD and 25,700 matched control individuals without AD from electronic health records.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Benjamin Ungar reported being an employee of Mount Sinai and receiving research funds from and serving as a consultant for various organizations.

Source: Powers CM, Piontkowski AJ, Orloff J, et al. Risk of lymphoma in patients with atopic dermatitis: A case-control study in the All of Us database. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 (Apr 4). doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.03.038 Source

Key clinical point: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a significantly increased risk of developing lymphoma.

Major finding: Patients with AD vs control individuals showed a significantly increased likelihood of developing noncutaneous T-cell lymphoma (odds ratio [OR] 2.52; 95% CI 1.37-4.62), with similar outcomes for the peripheral T-cell lymphoma subtype (OR 4.00; 95% CI 1.50-10.66).

Study details: Findings are from a nested case-control study including 6425 adult patients with AD and 25,700 matched control individuals without AD from electronic health records.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. Benjamin Ungar reported being an employee of Mount Sinai and receiving research funds from and serving as a consultant for various organizations.

Source: Powers CM, Piontkowski AJ, Orloff J, et al. Risk of lymphoma in patients with atopic dermatitis: A case-control study in the All of Us database. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 (Apr 4). doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.03.038 Source

Key clinical point: Passive smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for atopic dermatitis (AD) in offspring; however, the association between active smoking during pregnancy and AD in offspring remains unestablished.

Major finding: Passive smoking during pregnancy led to a higher risk for AD in offspring (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% CI 1.36-1.70); however, active smoking during pregnancy did not increase the risk for AD in offspring (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.86-1.07).

Study details: This meta-analysis of 15 observational studies included children or mother-child pairs who underwent either questionnaire-based or physician assessment for AD diagnosis and questionnaire-based assessment or cotinine level measurement for evaluating exposure to active or passive smoking.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Henan Province and the Key Scientific Research Projects in Universities of Henan Province, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Chao L, Liang W, Zhao X, et al. Maternal tobacco exposure during pregnancy and atopic dermatitis in offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Ma 14). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19958 Source

Key clinical point: Passive smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for atopic dermatitis (AD) in offspring; however, the association between active smoking during pregnancy and AD in offspring remains unestablished.

Major finding: Passive smoking during pregnancy led to a higher risk for AD in offspring (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% CI 1.36-1.70); however, active smoking during pregnancy did not increase the risk for AD in offspring (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.86-1.07).

Study details: This meta-analysis of 15 observational studies included children or mother-child pairs who underwent either questionnaire-based or physician assessment for AD diagnosis and questionnaire-based assessment or cotinine level measurement for evaluating exposure to active or passive smoking.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Henan Province and the Key Scientific Research Projects in Universities of Henan Province, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Chao L, Liang W, Zhao X, et al. Maternal tobacco exposure during pregnancy and atopic dermatitis in offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Ma 14). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19958 Source

Key clinical point: Passive smoking during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for atopic dermatitis (AD) in offspring; however, the association between active smoking during pregnancy and AD in offspring remains unestablished.

Major finding: Passive smoking during pregnancy led to a higher risk for AD in offspring (odds ratio [OR] 1.52; 95% CI 1.36-1.70); however, active smoking during pregnancy did not increase the risk for AD in offspring (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.86-1.07).

Study details: This meta-analysis of 15 observational studies included children or mother-child pairs who underwent either questionnaire-based or physician assessment for AD diagnosis and questionnaire-based assessment or cotinine level measurement for evaluating exposure to active or passive smoking.

Disclosures: This study was supported by the Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Henan Province and the Key Scientific Research Projects in Universities of Henan Province, China. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Chao L, Liang W, Zhao X, et al. Maternal tobacco exposure during pregnancy and atopic dermatitis in offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Ma 14). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19958 Source

Key clinical point: In children with atopic dermatitis (AD), weekly vitamin D3 (VD3) supplementation vs placebo for 6 weeks failed to decrease the clinical severity of AD or alter type 2 immunity biomarkers.

Major finding: At 6 weeks, the change in the Severity Scoring of AD (SCORAD) index was similar in the VD3 (−5.3 ± 11.6) and placebo (−5.5 ± 9.9; P = .91) groups. No significant between-group differences were observed for change in type 2 immunity blood biomarkers, such as eosinophil counts, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and specific IgE against staphylococcal enterotoxin A and B (all P > .05).

Study details: This randomized controlled trial included 101 children with AD (age 2-17 years) who were randomly assigned to receive weekly oral VD3 (8000, 12,000, and 16,000 IU for ages 2-5.9, 6-11.9, and 12-17.9 years, respectively; n = 53) or placebo (n = 48) for 6 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Fondo de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Borzutzky A, Iturriaga C, Pérez-Mateluna G, et al. Effect of weekly vitamin D supplementation on the severity of atopic dermatitis and type 2 immunity biomarkers in children: A randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Mar 14). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19959 Source

Key clinical point: In children with atopic dermatitis (AD), weekly vitamin D3 (VD3) supplementation vs placebo for 6 weeks failed to decrease the clinical severity of AD or alter type 2 immunity biomarkers.

Major finding: At 6 weeks, the change in the Severity Scoring of AD (SCORAD) index was similar in the VD3 (−5.3 ± 11.6) and placebo (−5.5 ± 9.9; P = .91) groups. No significant between-group differences were observed for change in type 2 immunity blood biomarkers, such as eosinophil counts, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and specific IgE against staphylococcal enterotoxin A and B (all P > .05).

Study details: This randomized controlled trial included 101 children with AD (age 2-17 years) who were randomly assigned to receive weekly oral VD3 (8000, 12,000, and 16,000 IU for ages 2-5.9, 6-11.9, and 12-17.9 years, respectively; n = 53) or placebo (n = 48) for 6 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Fondo de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Borzutzky A, Iturriaga C, Pérez-Mateluna G, et al. Effect of weekly vitamin D supplementation on the severity of atopic dermatitis and type 2 immunity biomarkers in children: A randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Mar 14). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19959 Source

Key clinical point: In children with atopic dermatitis (AD), weekly vitamin D3 (VD3) supplementation vs placebo for 6 weeks failed to decrease the clinical severity of AD or alter type 2 immunity biomarkers.

Major finding: At 6 weeks, the change in the Severity Scoring of AD (SCORAD) index was similar in the VD3 (−5.3 ± 11.6) and placebo (−5.5 ± 9.9; P = .91) groups. No significant between-group differences were observed for change in type 2 immunity blood biomarkers, such as eosinophil counts, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and specific IgE against staphylococcal enterotoxin A and B (all P > .05).

Study details: This randomized controlled trial included 101 children with AD (age 2-17 years) who were randomly assigned to receive weekly oral VD3 (8000, 12,000, and 16,000 IU for ages 2-5.9, 6-11.9, and 12-17.9 years, respectively; n = 53) or placebo (n = 48) for 6 weeks.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Fondo de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico, Chile. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Borzutzky A, Iturriaga C, Pérez-Mateluna G, et al. Effect of weekly vitamin D supplementation on the severity of atopic dermatitis and type 2 immunity biomarkers in children: A randomized controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 (Mar 14). doi: 10.1111/jdv.19959 Source

Key clinical point: Tralokinumab-mediated inhibition of interleukin (IL)-13 improved epidermal pathology and reduced the expression of key atopic dermatitis (AD) biomarkers in the serum of patients with moderate to severe AD.

Major finding: At week 16, tralokinumab vs placebo led to a significantly greater decrease from baseline in serum levels of type 2 biomarkers (CCL17/TARC, periostin, immunoglobulin E, and IL-22; all P < .05), a greater mean percentage change in the Eczema Area Severity Index score (−55.6 vs −36.7), and improved expression of genes dysregulated in AD (46.6% vs 16.4%; P < .001).

Study details: This study involved the collection of blood samples from 802 patients with moderate to severe AD randomized in the ECZTRA 1 and ECZTEND trials, followed by the selection of a subset of 299 patients with relevant samples available who had received tralokinumab (n = 223) or placebo (n = 76).

Disclosures: LEO Pharma A/S funded both ECZTRA 1 and the ongoing ECZTEND trial. Six authors declared being employees or shareholders of LEO Pharma. Several authors declared receiving research grants from or having other ties with various sources, including LEO Pharma.

Source: Guttman-Yassky E, Kabashima K, Staumont-Salle D, et al. Targeting IL-13 with tralokinumab normalizes type 2 inflammation in atopic dermatitis both early and at 2 years. Allergy. 2024 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1111/all.16108 Source

Key clinical point: Tralokinumab-mediated inhibition of interleukin (IL)-13 improved epidermal pathology and reduced the expression of key atopic dermatitis (AD) biomarkers in the serum of patients with moderate to severe AD.

Major finding: At week 16, tralokinumab vs placebo led to a significantly greater decrease from baseline in serum levels of type 2 biomarkers (CCL17/TARC, periostin, immunoglobulin E, and IL-22; all P < .05), a greater mean percentage change in the Eczema Area Severity Index score (−55.6 vs −36.7), and improved expression of genes dysregulated in AD (46.6% vs 16.4%; P < .001).

Study details: This study involved the collection of blood samples from 802 patients with moderate to severe AD randomized in the ECZTRA 1 and ECZTEND trials, followed by the selection of a subset of 299 patients with relevant samples available who had received tralokinumab (n = 223) or placebo (n = 76).

Disclosures: LEO Pharma A/S funded both ECZTRA 1 and the ongoing ECZTEND trial. Six authors declared being employees or shareholders of LEO Pharma. Several authors declared receiving research grants from or having other ties with various sources, including LEO Pharma.

Source: Guttman-Yassky E, Kabashima K, Staumont-Salle D, et al. Targeting IL-13 with tralokinumab normalizes type 2 inflammation in atopic dermatitis both early and at 2 years. Allergy. 2024 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1111/all.16108 Source

Key clinical point: Tralokinumab-mediated inhibition of interleukin (IL)-13 improved epidermal pathology and reduced the expression of key atopic dermatitis (AD) biomarkers in the serum of patients with moderate to severe AD.

Major finding: At week 16, tralokinumab vs placebo led to a significantly greater decrease from baseline in serum levels of type 2 biomarkers (CCL17/TARC, periostin, immunoglobulin E, and IL-22; all P < .05), a greater mean percentage change in the Eczema Area Severity Index score (−55.6 vs −36.7), and improved expression of genes dysregulated in AD (46.6% vs 16.4%; P < .001).

Study details: This study involved the collection of blood samples from 802 patients with moderate to severe AD randomized in the ECZTRA 1 and ECZTEND trials, followed by the selection of a subset of 299 patients with relevant samples available who had received tralokinumab (n = 223) or placebo (n = 76).

Disclosures: LEO Pharma A/S funded both ECZTRA 1 and the ongoing ECZTEND trial. Six authors declared being employees or shareholders of LEO Pharma. Several authors declared receiving research grants from or having other ties with various sources, including LEO Pharma.

Source: Guttman-Yassky E, Kabashima K, Staumont-Salle D, et al. Targeting IL-13 with tralokinumab normalizes type 2 inflammation in atopic dermatitis both early and at 2 years. Allergy. 2024 (Apr 2). doi: 10.1111/all.16108 Source

Key clinical point: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) at age 3 years showed an increased subsequent risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC); however, atopic manifestations were not associated with IBD.

Major finding: The presence of AD at age 3 years significantly increased the risk for IBD (pooled adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.46; 95% CI 1.13-1.88), CD (pooled aHR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04-2.26), and UC (pooled aHR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15-2.75) later in life. Any atopic manifestation by age 3 years was not associated with IBD (pooled aHR 1.20; 95% CI 0.95-1.52).

Study details: This study included 83,311 children from the All Babies in Southeast Sweden (1997-1999) and the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child (1999-2008) birth cohorts with questionnaire-based prospectively collected parent-reported information on asthma, AD, etc., developed by 3 years of age who were followed up from birth until 2021 or a diagnosis of IBD.

Disclosure: This study was supported by The Swedish Research Council and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lerchova T, Størdal K, Andersson B, Ludvigsson J, Mårild K. Atopic dermatitis in early childhood and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A Scandinavian birth cohort study. J Pediatr. 2024;270:14027 (Mar21). doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114027. Source

Key clinical point: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) at age 3 years showed an increased subsequent risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC); however, atopic manifestations were not associated with IBD.

Major finding: The presence of AD at age 3 years significantly increased the risk for IBD (pooled adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.46; 95% CI 1.13-1.88), CD (pooled aHR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04-2.26), and UC (pooled aHR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15-2.75) later in life. Any atopic manifestation by age 3 years was not associated with IBD (pooled aHR 1.20; 95% CI 0.95-1.52).

Study details: This study included 83,311 children from the All Babies in Southeast Sweden (1997-1999) and the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child (1999-2008) birth cohorts with questionnaire-based prospectively collected parent-reported information on asthma, AD, etc., developed by 3 years of age who were followed up from birth until 2021 or a diagnosis of IBD.

Disclosure: This study was supported by The Swedish Research Council and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lerchova T, Størdal K, Andersson B, Ludvigsson J, Mårild K. Atopic dermatitis in early childhood and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A Scandinavian birth cohort study. J Pediatr. 2024;270:14027 (Mar21). doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114027. Source

Key clinical point: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) at age 3 years showed an increased subsequent risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD), and ulcerative colitis (UC); however, atopic manifestations were not associated with IBD.

Major finding: The presence of AD at age 3 years significantly increased the risk for IBD (pooled adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.46; 95% CI 1.13-1.88), CD (pooled aHR 1.53; 95% CI 1.04-2.26), and UC (pooled aHR 1.78; 95% CI 1.15-2.75) later in life. Any atopic manifestation by age 3 years was not associated with IBD (pooled aHR 1.20; 95% CI 0.95-1.52).

Study details: This study included 83,311 children from the All Babies in Southeast Sweden (1997-1999) and the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child (1999-2008) birth cohorts with questionnaire-based prospectively collected parent-reported information on asthma, AD, etc., developed by 3 years of age who were followed up from birth until 2021 or a diagnosis of IBD.

Disclosure: This study was supported by The Swedish Research Council and others. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Lerchova T, Størdal K, Andersson B, Ludvigsson J, Mårild K. Atopic dermatitis in early childhood and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A Scandinavian birth cohort study. J Pediatr. 2024;270:14027 (Mar21). doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114027. Source

DENVER — Treatment with AXS-05, a combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion, demonstrated rapid, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvement in agitation related to Alzheimer’s disease and was generally well tolerated in the phase 3 ACCORD trial. 

More than half of participants in the open-label extension period of the randomized clinical trial responded to the medication, which was associated with a 3.6-fold lower risk for relapse compared with placebo. 

“The positive efficacy and favorable safety results with AXS-05 support its potential to fulfill a high unmet need for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease agitation,” said Anton P. Porsteinsson, MD, director of the Alzheimer’s Disease Care, Research and Education Program, University of Rochester, New York. 

The findings were presented at the 2024 annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. 
 

Common and Disruptive

Agitation is reported in up to 70% of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and is characterized by emotional distress, aggressive behaviors, disruptive irritability, and disinhibition. Alzheimer’s disease-related agitation has been associated with increased caregiver burden, decreased functioning, accelerated cognitive decline, earlier nursing home placement, and increased mortality.

A previous phase 2/3 study of AXS-05 showed that the investigative agent led to rapid and significantly improvement in Alzheimer’s disease agitation, as measured by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) total score, compared with placebo. 

ACCORD was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease agitation. 

In the open-label period, 178 adults with probable Alzheimer’s disease and clinically significant agitation received AXS-05 (titrated to 45 mg dextromethorphan/105 mg bupropion twice daily) for up to 9 weeks.

A total of 108 (61%) patients had a sustained response, with 30% or more improvement from baseline in the CMAI total score and improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change that were both maintained for 4 or more consecutive weeks. These patients entered the double-blind phase and were randomly allocated to receive twice-daily AXS-05 or placebo for up to 26 weeks.

In the double-blind period, AXS-05 “substantially and statistically” increased the time to relapse of agitation symptoms compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.275; P = .014).

“The risk of relapse was 3.6-fold lower with AXS-05 compared with placebo,” Dr. Porsteinsson reported. 

AXS-05 was also associated with a significantly lower relapse rate compared with placebo (7.5% vs 25.9%; P = .018).

Rates of discontinuation in the double-blind period owing to adverse events (AEs) were low (0% for AXS-05 and 1.9% for placebo). Three serious AEs were reported: one in the AXS-05 group (fecaloma), which was not related to study medication, and two in the placebo group (cardiac arrest, femur fracture).

Falls were reported in four participants in the AXS-05 group, none of which were related to study medication or associated with serious AEs, and in two participants in the placebo group, one of which was associated with femur fracture.

One death was reported in the placebo group. There was no evidence of cognitive decline with AXS-05, and treatment was not associated with sedation. 
 

Promising Agent 

Commenting on this research, Glen R. Finney, MD, director of the Geisinger Memory and Cognition Clinic in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, said the data “look promising as a safe way to help address acute agitation and reduce agitation reoccurrence.

“Agitation is a common, distressing, and sometimes safety issue for people fighting Alzheimer’s disease, and there’s very little evidence for efficacy and significant side effect issues for current medical management of agitation in Alzheimer’s disease,” said Dr. Finney, who was not part of the study.

He noted that first-line strategies for addressing agitation involve behavioral and environmental interventions. 

“See if there’s a reason for the agitation and address that. Look for triggers for agitation and avoid those. Find places, things, and interactions that help people with Alzheimer’s disease avoid agitation: familiar locations, music, simple engaging activities. Reassurance, redirection, and distraction can help de-escalate agitation. Provide a safe environment that reduces safety risks,” Dr. Finney explained. 

The next step, when medically appropriate, is trying acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine, and then adding memantine, a weak N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. 

“These medications can help reduce the risk of agitation,” Dr. Finney said. 

“Beyond that, the evidence becomes weaker for any specific treatments, and that is where treatments with emerging evidence of efficacy and safety like dextromethorphan-bupropion become important,” Dr. Finney added. 

Last May, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the antipsychotic brexpiprazole (Rexulti) for Alzheimer’s disease-related agitation, making it the first FDA-approved drug for this indication. 

The drug includes a boxed warning for medications in this class that older patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk for death.

“There’s certainly a need to have multiple options for treating agitation in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease,” said Rebecca Edelmayer, PhD, senior director of scientific engagement for the Alzheimer’s Association. 

Dr. Edelmayer, who was not part of the study, noted that in the ACCORD study, AXS-05 “significantly delayed the relapse or prevented the relapse with Alzheimer’s disease agitation compared with the placebo group and it was generally well tolerated, but it will be important to make sure that there’s more thorough review of the data overall to be sure that it’s both safe and effective.”

The study was funded by Axsome Therapeutics, the manufacturer of AXS-05. Dr. Porsteinsson has disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. Dr. Finney and Dr. Edelmayer have no relevant disclosures.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

DENVER — Treatment with AXS-05, a combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion, demonstrated rapid, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvement in agitation related to Alzheimer’s disease and was generally well tolerated in the phase 3 ACCORD trial. 

More than half of participants in the open-label extension period of the randomized clinical trial responded to the medication, which was associated with a 3.6-fold lower risk for relapse compared with placebo. 

“The positive efficacy and favorable safety results with AXS-05 support its potential to fulfill a high unmet need for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease agitation,” said Anton P. Porsteinsson, MD, director of the Alzheimer’s Disease Care, Research and Education Program, University of Rochester, New York. 

The findings were presented at the 2024 annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. 
 

Common and Disruptive

Agitation is reported in up to 70% of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and is characterized by emotional distress, aggressive behaviors, disruptive irritability, and disinhibition. Alzheimer’s disease-related agitation has been associated with increased caregiver burden, decreased functioning, accelerated cognitive decline, earlier nursing home placement, and increased mortality.

A previous phase 2/3 study of AXS-05 showed that the investigative agent led to rapid and significantly improvement in Alzheimer’s disease agitation, as measured by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) total score, compared with placebo. 

ACCORD was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease agitation. 

In the open-label period, 178 adults with probable Alzheimer’s disease and clinically significant agitation received AXS-05 (titrated to 45 mg dextromethorphan/105 mg bupropion twice daily) for up to 9 weeks.

A total of 108 (61%) patients had a sustained response, with 30% or more improvement from baseline in the CMAI total score and improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change that were both maintained for 4 or more consecutive weeks. These patients entered the double-blind phase and were randomly allocated to receive twice-daily AXS-05 or placebo for up to 26 weeks.

In the double-blind period, AXS-05 “substantially and statistically” increased the time to relapse of agitation symptoms compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.275; P = .014).

“The risk of relapse was 3.6-fold lower with AXS-05 compared with placebo,” Dr. Porsteinsson reported. 

AXS-05 was also associated with a significantly lower relapse rate compared with placebo (7.5% vs 25.9%; P = .018).

Rates of discontinuation in the double-blind period owing to adverse events (AEs) were low (0% for AXS-05 and 1.9% for placebo). Three serious AEs were reported: one in the AXS-05 group (fecaloma), which was not related to study medication, and two in the placebo group (cardiac arrest, femur fracture).

Falls were reported in four participants in the AXS-05 group, none of which were related to study medication or associated with serious AEs, and in two participants in the placebo group, one of which was associated with femur fracture.

One death was reported in the placebo group. There was no evidence of cognitive decline with AXS-05, and treatment was not associated with sedation. 
 

Promising Agent 

Commenting on this research, Glen R. Finney, MD, director of the Geisinger Memory and Cognition Clinic in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, said the data “look promising as a safe way to help address acute agitation and reduce agitation reoccurrence.

“Agitation is a common, distressing, and sometimes safety issue for people fighting Alzheimer’s disease, and there’s very little evidence for efficacy and significant side effect issues for current medical management of agitation in Alzheimer’s disease,” said Dr. Finney, who was not part of the study.

He noted that first-line strategies for addressing agitation involve behavioral and environmental interventions. 

“See if there’s a reason for the agitation and address that. Look for triggers for agitation and avoid those. Find places, things, and interactions that help people with Alzheimer’s disease avoid agitation: familiar locations, music, simple engaging activities. Reassurance, redirection, and distraction can help de-escalate agitation. Provide a safe environment that reduces safety risks,” Dr. Finney explained. 

The next step, when medically appropriate, is trying acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine, and then adding memantine, a weak N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. 

“These medications can help reduce the risk of agitation,” Dr. Finney said. 

“Beyond that, the evidence becomes weaker for any specific treatments, and that is where treatments with emerging evidence of efficacy and safety like dextromethorphan-bupropion become important,” Dr. Finney added. 

Last May, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the antipsychotic brexpiprazole (Rexulti) for Alzheimer’s disease-related agitation, making it the first FDA-approved drug for this indication. 

The drug includes a boxed warning for medications in this class that older patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk for death.

“There’s certainly a need to have multiple options for treating agitation in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease,” said Rebecca Edelmayer, PhD, senior director of scientific engagement for the Alzheimer’s Association. 

Dr. Edelmayer, who was not part of the study, noted that in the ACCORD study, AXS-05 “significantly delayed the relapse or prevented the relapse with Alzheimer’s disease agitation compared with the placebo group and it was generally well tolerated, but it will be important to make sure that there’s more thorough review of the data overall to be sure that it’s both safe and effective.”

The study was funded by Axsome Therapeutics, the manufacturer of AXS-05. Dr. Porsteinsson has disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. Dr. Finney and Dr. Edelmayer have no relevant disclosures.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

DENVER — Treatment with AXS-05, a combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion, demonstrated rapid, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvement in agitation related to Alzheimer’s disease and was generally well tolerated in the phase 3 ACCORD trial. 

More than half of participants in the open-label extension period of the randomized clinical trial responded to the medication, which was associated with a 3.6-fold lower risk for relapse compared with placebo. 

“The positive efficacy and favorable safety results with AXS-05 support its potential to fulfill a high unmet need for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease agitation,” said Anton P. Porsteinsson, MD, director of the Alzheimer’s Disease Care, Research and Education Program, University of Rochester, New York. 

The findings were presented at the 2024 annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. 
 

Common and Disruptive

Agitation is reported in up to 70% of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and is characterized by emotional distress, aggressive behaviors, disruptive irritability, and disinhibition. Alzheimer’s disease-related agitation has been associated with increased caregiver burden, decreased functioning, accelerated cognitive decline, earlier nursing home placement, and increased mortality.

A previous phase 2/3 study of AXS-05 showed that the investigative agent led to rapid and significantly improvement in Alzheimer’s disease agitation, as measured by the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) total score, compared with placebo. 

ACCORD was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of AXS-05 in patients with Alzheimer’s disease agitation. 

In the open-label period, 178 adults with probable Alzheimer’s disease and clinically significant agitation received AXS-05 (titrated to 45 mg dextromethorphan/105 mg bupropion twice daily) for up to 9 weeks.

A total of 108 (61%) patients had a sustained response, with 30% or more improvement from baseline in the CMAI total score and improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change that were both maintained for 4 or more consecutive weeks. These patients entered the double-blind phase and were randomly allocated to receive twice-daily AXS-05 or placebo for up to 26 weeks.

In the double-blind period, AXS-05 “substantially and statistically” increased the time to relapse of agitation symptoms compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.275; P = .014).

“The risk of relapse was 3.6-fold lower with AXS-05 compared with placebo,” Dr. Porsteinsson reported. 

AXS-05 was also associated with a significantly lower relapse rate compared with placebo (7.5% vs 25.9%; P = .018).

Rates of discontinuation in the double-blind period owing to adverse events (AEs) were low (0% for AXS-05 and 1.9% for placebo). Three serious AEs were reported: one in the AXS-05 group (fecaloma), which was not related to study medication, and two in the placebo group (cardiac arrest, femur fracture).

Falls were reported in four participants in the AXS-05 group, none of which were related to study medication or associated with serious AEs, and in two participants in the placebo group, one of which was associated with femur fracture.

One death was reported in the placebo group. There was no evidence of cognitive decline with AXS-05, and treatment was not associated with sedation. 
 

Promising Agent 

Commenting on this research, Glen R. Finney, MD, director of the Geisinger Memory and Cognition Clinic in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, said the data “look promising as a safe way to help address acute agitation and reduce agitation reoccurrence.

“Agitation is a common, distressing, and sometimes safety issue for people fighting Alzheimer’s disease, and there’s very little evidence for efficacy and significant side effect issues for current medical management of agitation in Alzheimer’s disease,” said Dr. Finney, who was not part of the study.

He noted that first-line strategies for addressing agitation involve behavioral and environmental interventions. 

“See if there’s a reason for the agitation and address that. Look for triggers for agitation and avoid those. Find places, things, and interactions that help people with Alzheimer’s disease avoid agitation: familiar locations, music, simple engaging activities. Reassurance, redirection, and distraction can help de-escalate agitation. Provide a safe environment that reduces safety risks,” Dr. Finney explained. 

The next step, when medically appropriate, is trying acetylcholinesterase inhibitors such as donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine, and then adding memantine, a weak N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. 

“These medications can help reduce the risk of agitation,” Dr. Finney said. 

“Beyond that, the evidence becomes weaker for any specific treatments, and that is where treatments with emerging evidence of efficacy and safety like dextromethorphan-bupropion become important,” Dr. Finney added. 

Last May, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the antipsychotic brexpiprazole (Rexulti) for Alzheimer’s disease-related agitation, making it the first FDA-approved drug for this indication. 

The drug includes a boxed warning for medications in this class that older patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk for death.

“There’s certainly a need to have multiple options for treating agitation in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease,” said Rebecca Edelmayer, PhD, senior director of scientific engagement for the Alzheimer’s Association. 

Dr. Edelmayer, who was not part of the study, noted that in the ACCORD study, AXS-05 “significantly delayed the relapse or prevented the relapse with Alzheimer’s disease agitation compared with the placebo group and it was generally well tolerated, but it will be important to make sure that there’s more thorough review of the data overall to be sure that it’s both safe and effective.”

The study was funded by Axsome Therapeutics, the manufacturer of AXS-05. Dr. Porsteinsson has disclosed no relevant conflicts of interest. Dr. Finney and Dr. Edelmayer have no relevant disclosures.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Key novel genetic signatures in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) strongly correlate with improved survival outcomes in treatment with the anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel).

“Our transcriptomic analysis of ZUMA-7 dataset identified novel gene expression signatures predictive of outcome with axi-cel,” the authors reported in research presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research earlier in April. “These gene expression signatures could support risk-stratification of LBCL patients.”

The results are from a subanalysis of the phase 3 ZUMA-7 trial in which patients with early relapsed or primary refractory LBCL were treated with axi-cel, administered as a one-time dose in the second-line setting.

Long-term results from the trial showed a 4-year overall survival of 54.6% with axi-cel versus 46.0% with the standard of care (P = .03), with a median rate of progression-free survival of 14.7 months with axi-cel versus 3.7 months in the standard-second-line treatment.

In the study, the authors noted that, “although the use of axi-cel resulted in long-term survival in more than half of treated patients, it is important to continue to strive to improve patient outcomes.”

Following up on that, senior author Simone Filosto, of Kite, a Gilead Company, of Santa Monica, California, and colleagues launched their analysis of the genetic profiles of those who did and did not have favorable responses, using data from the ZUMA-7 trial.

Using gene expression profiling with the IO-360 Nanostring gene expression panel of 769 genes, they evaluated pretreated LBCL tumor samples from 134 of the patients treated with axi-cel.

After multivariate adjustment, the results showed that those with a distinctive 6-transcript genetic expression signature, consisting of CD19, CD45RA, CCL22, KLRK1, SOX11, and SIGLEC5, had a significantly higher rate of event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; P = 1.82 x 10^-8), as well as progression-free survival (HR, 0.27; P = 1.35 x 10^-7) after treatment with axi-cel, compared with those who did not have the signature.

The authors speculated that “the 6-gene expression signature may capture lymphomas with abundant adhesion molecules, a relatively low inflammation, and abundant expression of the targeted antigen (CD19).”

Conversely, the analysis showed that increased levels of an unfavorable 17-transcript gene expression signature had a strong negative correlation with event-free survival (HR, 6.19; P = 1.51 x 10^-13) and progression-free survival (HR, 7.58; P = 2.70 x 10^-14).

The 17-transcript signature included CD45RO, BCL2, IL-18R1, TNFSF4 [OX40L], KLRB1 [CD161], KIR3DL2, ITGB8, DUSP5, GPC4, PSMB5, RPS6KB1, SERPINA9, NBN, GLUD1, ESR1, ARID1A, and SLC16A1.

“The 17-gene expression signature is consistent with a high level of immune infiltration and inflammation paralleled by the activation of immune-escape mechanisms, such as the upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes,” the authors explain.

Of note, the 17-gene expression signature was elevated among 18 patients who progressed after axi-cel treatment.

Importantly, the gene expression signatures were not associated with outcomes observed among patients receiving second-line standard of care in the ZUMA-7 trial. And the signatures also did not correspond with outcomes following first-line R-CHOP chemotherapy reported in two online datasets, indicating their predictive rather than prognostic value.

Commenting on the findings, Marco Ruella, MD, noted that “stratifying the [CAR T-treated] patients is extremely important given that only a subset of them, 30%-40%, will experience long-term remission.”

“In an ideal scenario, we would want to treat only the patients who would benefit from such a complex and expensive therapy,” underscored Dr. Ruella, assistant professor in the Division of Hematology/Oncology and the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies and Scientific Director of the Lymphoma Program at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

A key caveat is that the results need more validation before they true gain clinical value, he noted.

“We need more data before we can use such a score in the clinic as we would need to be absolutely confident on the predictive value of such a score in additional confirmatory cohorts.”

Furthermore, caution is warranted in avoiding excluding any patients unnecessarily, he added.

“Only if there are approximately zero chances of response would we be able to exclude a patient from a treatment,” Dr. Ruella noted. “If the chance of long-term cure are minimal but still present, it might still make sense for the patient.” 

Nevertheless, such findings advance the understanding of the therapy’s implication in a meaningful way, he said.

“I think this study [and similar others] are important studies that help us better understand the mechanisms of relapse,” he said.

“Translationally, we are getting closer to reaching a point where we can precisely predict outcomes and, perhaps in the future, select the patients that would benefit the most from these treatments.”

Dr. Filosto and other authors are employees of Kite, which manufactures axi-cel. Dr. Ruella treats patients with CAR T products that have been licensed to Novartis, Kite, and Vittoria Bio.

Key novel genetic signatures in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) strongly correlate with improved survival outcomes in treatment with the anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel).

“Our transcriptomic analysis of ZUMA-7 dataset identified novel gene expression signatures predictive of outcome with axi-cel,” the authors reported in research presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research earlier in April. “These gene expression signatures could support risk-stratification of LBCL patients.”

The results are from a subanalysis of the phase 3 ZUMA-7 trial in which patients with early relapsed or primary refractory LBCL were treated with axi-cel, administered as a one-time dose in the second-line setting.

Long-term results from the trial showed a 4-year overall survival of 54.6% with axi-cel versus 46.0% with the standard of care (P = .03), with a median rate of progression-free survival of 14.7 months with axi-cel versus 3.7 months in the standard-second-line treatment.

In the study, the authors noted that, “although the use of axi-cel resulted in long-term survival in more than half of treated patients, it is important to continue to strive to improve patient outcomes.”

Following up on that, senior author Simone Filosto, of Kite, a Gilead Company, of Santa Monica, California, and colleagues launched their analysis of the genetic profiles of those who did and did not have favorable responses, using data from the ZUMA-7 trial.

Using gene expression profiling with the IO-360 Nanostring gene expression panel of 769 genes, they evaluated pretreated LBCL tumor samples from 134 of the patients treated with axi-cel.

After multivariate adjustment, the results showed that those with a distinctive 6-transcript genetic expression signature, consisting of CD19, CD45RA, CCL22, KLRK1, SOX11, and SIGLEC5, had a significantly higher rate of event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; P = 1.82 x 10^-8), as well as progression-free survival (HR, 0.27; P = 1.35 x 10^-7) after treatment with axi-cel, compared with those who did not have the signature.

The authors speculated that “the 6-gene expression signature may capture lymphomas with abundant adhesion molecules, a relatively low inflammation, and abundant expression of the targeted antigen (CD19).”

Conversely, the analysis showed that increased levels of an unfavorable 17-transcript gene expression signature had a strong negative correlation with event-free survival (HR, 6.19; P = 1.51 x 10^-13) and progression-free survival (HR, 7.58; P = 2.70 x 10^-14).

The 17-transcript signature included CD45RO, BCL2, IL-18R1, TNFSF4 [OX40L], KLRB1 [CD161], KIR3DL2, ITGB8, DUSP5, GPC4, PSMB5, RPS6KB1, SERPINA9, NBN, GLUD1, ESR1, ARID1A, and SLC16A1.

“The 17-gene expression signature is consistent with a high level of immune infiltration and inflammation paralleled by the activation of immune-escape mechanisms, such as the upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes,” the authors explain.

Of note, the 17-gene expression signature was elevated among 18 patients who progressed after axi-cel treatment.

Importantly, the gene expression signatures were not associated with outcomes observed among patients receiving second-line standard of care in the ZUMA-7 trial. And the signatures also did not correspond with outcomes following first-line R-CHOP chemotherapy reported in two online datasets, indicating their predictive rather than prognostic value.

Commenting on the findings, Marco Ruella, MD, noted that “stratifying the [CAR T-treated] patients is extremely important given that only a subset of them, 30%-40%, will experience long-term remission.”

“In an ideal scenario, we would want to treat only the patients who would benefit from such a complex and expensive therapy,” underscored Dr. Ruella, assistant professor in the Division of Hematology/Oncology and the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies and Scientific Director of the Lymphoma Program at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

A key caveat is that the results need more validation before they true gain clinical value, he noted.

“We need more data before we can use such a score in the clinic as we would need to be absolutely confident on the predictive value of such a score in additional confirmatory cohorts.”

Furthermore, caution is warranted in avoiding excluding any patients unnecessarily, he added.

“Only if there are approximately zero chances of response would we be able to exclude a patient from a treatment,” Dr. Ruella noted. “If the chance of long-term cure are minimal but still present, it might still make sense for the patient.” 

Nevertheless, such findings advance the understanding of the therapy’s implication in a meaningful way, he said.

“I think this study [and similar others] are important studies that help us better understand the mechanisms of relapse,” he said.

“Translationally, we are getting closer to reaching a point where we can precisely predict outcomes and, perhaps in the future, select the patients that would benefit the most from these treatments.”

Dr. Filosto and other authors are employees of Kite, which manufactures axi-cel. Dr. Ruella treats patients with CAR T products that have been licensed to Novartis, Kite, and Vittoria Bio.

Key novel genetic signatures in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) strongly correlate with improved survival outcomes in treatment with the anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel).

“Our transcriptomic analysis of ZUMA-7 dataset identified novel gene expression signatures predictive of outcome with axi-cel,” the authors reported in research presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research earlier in April. “These gene expression signatures could support risk-stratification of LBCL patients.”

The results are from a subanalysis of the phase 3 ZUMA-7 trial in which patients with early relapsed or primary refractory LBCL were treated with axi-cel, administered as a one-time dose in the second-line setting.

Long-term results from the trial showed a 4-year overall survival of 54.6% with axi-cel versus 46.0% with the standard of care (P = .03), with a median rate of progression-free survival of 14.7 months with axi-cel versus 3.7 months in the standard-second-line treatment.

In the study, the authors noted that, “although the use of axi-cel resulted in long-term survival in more than half of treated patients, it is important to continue to strive to improve patient outcomes.”

Following up on that, senior author Simone Filosto, of Kite, a Gilead Company, of Santa Monica, California, and colleagues launched their analysis of the genetic profiles of those who did and did not have favorable responses, using data from the ZUMA-7 trial.

Using gene expression profiling with the IO-360 Nanostring gene expression panel of 769 genes, they evaluated pretreated LBCL tumor samples from 134 of the patients treated with axi-cel.

After multivariate adjustment, the results showed that those with a distinctive 6-transcript genetic expression signature, consisting of CD19, CD45RA, CCL22, KLRK1, SOX11, and SIGLEC5, had a significantly higher rate of event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; P = 1.82 x 10^-8), as well as progression-free survival (HR, 0.27; P = 1.35 x 10^-7) after treatment with axi-cel, compared with those who did not have the signature.

The authors speculated that “the 6-gene expression signature may capture lymphomas with abundant adhesion molecules, a relatively low inflammation, and abundant expression of the targeted antigen (CD19).”

Conversely, the analysis showed that increased levels of an unfavorable 17-transcript gene expression signature had a strong negative correlation with event-free survival (HR, 6.19; P = 1.51 x 10^-13) and progression-free survival (HR, 7.58; P = 2.70 x 10^-14).

The 17-transcript signature included CD45RO, BCL2, IL-18R1, TNFSF4 [OX40L], KLRB1 [CD161], KIR3DL2, ITGB8, DUSP5, GPC4, PSMB5, RPS6KB1, SERPINA9, NBN, GLUD1, ESR1, ARID1A, and SLC16A1.

“The 17-gene expression signature is consistent with a high level of immune infiltration and inflammation paralleled by the activation of immune-escape mechanisms, such as the upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes,” the authors explain.

Of note, the 17-gene expression signature was elevated among 18 patients who progressed after axi-cel treatment.

Importantly, the gene expression signatures were not associated with outcomes observed among patients receiving second-line standard of care in the ZUMA-7 trial. And the signatures also did not correspond with outcomes following first-line R-CHOP chemotherapy reported in two online datasets, indicating their predictive rather than prognostic value.

Commenting on the findings, Marco Ruella, MD, noted that “stratifying the [CAR T-treated] patients is extremely important given that only a subset of them, 30%-40%, will experience long-term remission.”

“In an ideal scenario, we would want to treat only the patients who would benefit from such a complex and expensive therapy,” underscored Dr. Ruella, assistant professor in the Division of Hematology/Oncology and the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies and Scientific Director of the Lymphoma Program at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

A key caveat is that the results need more validation before they true gain clinical value, he noted.

“We need more data before we can use such a score in the clinic as we would need to be absolutely confident on the predictive value of such a score in additional confirmatory cohorts.”

Furthermore, caution is warranted in avoiding excluding any patients unnecessarily, he added.

“Only if there are approximately zero chances of response would we be able to exclude a patient from a treatment,” Dr. Ruella noted. “If the chance of long-term cure are minimal but still present, it might still make sense for the patient.” 

Nevertheless, such findings advance the understanding of the therapy’s implication in a meaningful way, he said.

“I think this study [and similar others] are important studies that help us better understand the mechanisms of relapse,” he said.

“Translationally, we are getting closer to reaching a point where we can precisely predict outcomes and, perhaps in the future, select the patients that would benefit the most from these treatments.”

Dr. Filosto and other authors are employees of Kite, which manufactures axi-cel. Dr. Ruella treats patients with CAR T products that have been licensed to Novartis, Kite, and Vittoria Bio.

WIESBADEN, GERMANY — Crowded waiting rooms, long wait times, irritable patients, and aggression toward nursing staff and doctors are increasingly the reality in German emergency rooms. Clearly, emergencies belong in the emergency room. However, “In about half of all patients in the emergency room, there is no urgent medical emergency,” Norbert Schütz, MD, director of geriatrics and rheumatology at Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Hospital in Wiesbaden, Germany, said at a press conference for the 130th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Internal Medicine (DGIM).

“In our daily medical practice, we repeatedly experience people either accessing our emergency departments and ambulances too quickly or lingering at home for too long when they have severe symptoms,” said Dr. Schütz, who organized the Patient Day during the Internist Congress.
 

DGIM Educates Patients

What is an emergency? “I think the public is quite well informed about conditions associated with loss of consciousness, severe pain, chest pain, or paralysis: Think stroke or heart attack. This is undoubtedly a success of recent years. The difficulty arises with everything in between. For instance, should I go to the hospital with severe headaches?” asked Dr. Schütz.

When is a patient a case for the emergency room, the physician on-call service, or the general practitioner? At the Patient Day in Wiesbaden, DGIM aims to educate and train interested parties with a dedicated lecture. The focus is on recognizing an emergency, specifically emergencies in children and mental illnesses.

“Our Patient Day aims to contribute to making the right decisions. We want to inform, answer questions, and alleviate fears,” said Dr. Schütz. Interested parties can refresh their emergency knowledge, tour ambulances, and have the equipment explained. The public also has the opportunity to learn about resuscitation techniques theoretically and practically.

“In general, the general practitioner should always be the first point of contact. They know their patients best and have the most background information,” explained Dr. Schütz. A trusting relationship is crucial for correctly assessing an unclear medical situation. “Should, for whatever reason, the general practitioner not be reachable, the physician on-call service can be reached,” said Dr. Schütz. It may happen, however, that neither the general practitioner nor the on-call physician is immediately available.
 

What Are Emergencies?

In cases of severe health impairment, urgency is required, and a severe emergency should be assumed in the following cases:

• Chest pain
• Circulatory disorder
• Disorders of consciousness
• Breathing difficulties
• Sudden weakness or numbness/paralysis
• Severe bleeding
• Allergic shock

“In such cases, the emergency departments of the hospitals are available around the clock, and if necessary, an emergency doctor should be present during transportation to the hospital,” said Dr. Schütz.

Classifying emergencies is challenging, especially with children. “Children often find it difficult to clearly categorize or describe symptoms,” said Dr. Schütz. A situation is critical if, for example, the child’s breathing or consciousness is impaired.

Mental emergencies pose a particular challenge for patients and relatives because the patient and relatives are often overwhelmed by the situation. If there are suicidal thoughts, the patient should present him- or herself immediately to an emergency room.

“Patients who come to the emergency room because they cannot get appointments with their general practitioner or specialist, for whatever reason, are no emergency. We also see this in the emergency room from time to time,” said Dr. Schütz. Emergency rooms are not intended for this purpose. “And generally, these are not emergencies.”
 

Four of 10 Cases

The number of patients in emergency rooms has steadily increased in recent years. Statistically, only 4 out of 10 cases are genuine emergencies, as detailed surveys of patients in the emergency rooms of northern German hospitals have shown.

In the PiNo Nord cross-sectional study, Martin Scherer, MD, of University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany, and his team examined the reasons why patients visit the emergency room. They interviewed 1175 patients in five hospitals and documented the medical diagnoses. Patients classified as “immediately” or “very urgently” in need of treatment were excluded.

The surveyed patients were on average 41.8 years old, 52.9% were men, and 54.7% of the patients indicated a low urgency of treatment. About 41% of the patients visited the emergency room on their own initiative, 17% stated they were referred or entrusted by their general practitioner, and 8% were referred by a specialist in the emergency room.

The strongest predictors for low subjective treatment urgency were musculoskeletal trauma (odds ratio [OR], 2.18), skin afflictions (OR, 2.15), and the unavailability of an open general practitioner’s office (OR, 1.70).

According to Dr. Scherer and his colleagues, the reasons for visiting an emergency room are diverse and can be based on the perceived structural conditions and individual patient preferences in addition to the urgency of the health problem.
 

This story was translated from the Medscape German edition using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

WIESBADEN, GERMANY — Crowded waiting rooms, long wait times, irritable patients, and aggression toward nursing staff and doctors are increasingly the reality in German emergency rooms. Clearly, emergencies belong in the emergency room. However, “In about half of all patients in the emergency room, there is no urgent medical emergency,” Norbert Schütz, MD, director of geriatrics and rheumatology at Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Hospital in Wiesbaden, Germany, said at a press conference for the 130th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Internal Medicine (DGIM).

“In our daily medical practice, we repeatedly experience people either accessing our emergency departments and ambulances too quickly or lingering at home for too long when they have severe symptoms,” said Dr. Schütz, who organized the Patient Day during the Internist Congress.
 

DGIM Educates Patients

What is an emergency? “I think the public is quite well informed about conditions associated with loss of consciousness, severe pain, chest pain, or paralysis: Think stroke or heart attack. This is undoubtedly a success of recent years. The difficulty arises with everything in between. For instance, should I go to the hospital with severe headaches?” asked Dr. Schütz.

When is a patient a case for the emergency room, the physician on-call service, or the general practitioner? At the Patient Day in Wiesbaden, DGIM aims to educate and train interested parties with a dedicated lecture. The focus is on recognizing an emergency, specifically emergencies in children and mental illnesses.

“Our Patient Day aims to contribute to making the right decisions. We want to inform, answer questions, and alleviate fears,” said Dr. Schütz. Interested parties can refresh their emergency knowledge, tour ambulances, and have the equipment explained. The public also has the opportunity to learn about resuscitation techniques theoretically and practically.

“In general, the general practitioner should always be the first point of contact. They know their patients best and have the most background information,” explained Dr. Schütz. A trusting relationship is crucial for correctly assessing an unclear medical situation. “Should, for whatever reason, the general practitioner not be reachable, the physician on-call service can be reached,” said Dr. Schütz. It may happen, however, that neither the general practitioner nor the on-call physician is immediately available.
 

What Are Emergencies?

In cases of severe health impairment, urgency is required, and a severe emergency should be assumed in the following cases:

• Chest pain
• Circulatory disorder
• Disorders of consciousness
• Breathing difficulties
• Sudden weakness or numbness/paralysis
• Severe bleeding
• Allergic shock

“In such cases, the emergency departments of the hospitals are available around the clock, and if necessary, an emergency doctor should be present during transportation to the hospital,” said Dr. Schütz.

Classifying emergencies is challenging, especially with children. “Children often find it difficult to clearly categorize or describe symptoms,” said Dr. Schütz. A situation is critical if, for example, the child’s breathing or consciousness is impaired.

Mental emergencies pose a particular challenge for patients and relatives because the patient and relatives are often overwhelmed by the situation. If there are suicidal thoughts, the patient should present him- or herself immediately to an emergency room.

“Patients who come to the emergency room because they cannot get appointments with their general practitioner or specialist, for whatever reason, are no emergency. We also see this in the emergency room from time to time,” said Dr. Schütz. Emergency rooms are not intended for this purpose. “And generally, these are not emergencies.”
 

Four of 10 Cases

The number of patients in emergency rooms has steadily increased in recent years. Statistically, only 4 out of 10 cases are genuine emergencies, as detailed surveys of patients in the emergency rooms of northern German hospitals have shown.

In the PiNo Nord cross-sectional study, Martin Scherer, MD, of University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany, and his team examined the reasons why patients visit the emergency room. They interviewed 1175 patients in five hospitals and documented the medical diagnoses. Patients classified as “immediately” or “very urgently” in need of treatment were excluded.

The surveyed patients were on average 41.8 years old, 52.9% were men, and 54.7% of the patients indicated a low urgency of treatment. About 41% of the patients visited the emergency room on their own initiative, 17% stated they were referred or entrusted by their general practitioner, and 8% were referred by a specialist in the emergency room.

The strongest predictors for low subjective treatment urgency were musculoskeletal trauma (odds ratio [OR], 2.18), skin afflictions (OR, 2.15), and the unavailability of an open general practitioner’s office (OR, 1.70).

According to Dr. Scherer and his colleagues, the reasons for visiting an emergency room are diverse and can be based on the perceived structural conditions and individual patient preferences in addition to the urgency of the health problem.
 

This story was translated from the Medscape German edition using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

WIESBADEN, GERMANY — Crowded waiting rooms, long wait times, irritable patients, and aggression toward nursing staff and doctors are increasingly the reality in German emergency rooms. Clearly, emergencies belong in the emergency room. However, “In about half of all patients in the emergency room, there is no urgent medical emergency,” Norbert Schütz, MD, director of geriatrics and rheumatology at Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Hospital in Wiesbaden, Germany, said at a press conference for the 130th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Internal Medicine (DGIM).

“In our daily medical practice, we repeatedly experience people either accessing our emergency departments and ambulances too quickly or lingering at home for too long when they have severe symptoms,” said Dr. Schütz, who organized the Patient Day during the Internist Congress.
 

DGIM Educates Patients

What is an emergency? “I think the public is quite well informed about conditions associated with loss of consciousness, severe pain, chest pain, or paralysis: Think stroke or heart attack. This is undoubtedly a success of recent years. The difficulty arises with everything in between. For instance, should I go to the hospital with severe headaches?” asked Dr. Schütz.

When is a patient a case for the emergency room, the physician on-call service, or the general practitioner? At the Patient Day in Wiesbaden, DGIM aims to educate and train interested parties with a dedicated lecture. The focus is on recognizing an emergency, specifically emergencies in children and mental illnesses.

“Our Patient Day aims to contribute to making the right decisions. We want to inform, answer questions, and alleviate fears,” said Dr. Schütz. Interested parties can refresh their emergency knowledge, tour ambulances, and have the equipment explained. The public also has the opportunity to learn about resuscitation techniques theoretically and practically.

“In general, the general practitioner should always be the first point of contact. They know their patients best and have the most background information,” explained Dr. Schütz. A trusting relationship is crucial for correctly assessing an unclear medical situation. “Should, for whatever reason, the general practitioner not be reachable, the physician on-call service can be reached,” said Dr. Schütz. It may happen, however, that neither the general practitioner nor the on-call physician is immediately available.
 

What Are Emergencies?

In cases of severe health impairment, urgency is required, and a severe emergency should be assumed in the following cases:

• Chest pain
• Circulatory disorder
• Disorders of consciousness
• Breathing difficulties
• Sudden weakness or numbness/paralysis
• Severe bleeding
• Allergic shock

“In such cases, the emergency departments of the hospitals are available around the clock, and if necessary, an emergency doctor should be present during transportation to the hospital,” said Dr. Schütz.

Classifying emergencies is challenging, especially with children. “Children often find it difficult to clearly categorize or describe symptoms,” said Dr. Schütz. A situation is critical if, for example, the child’s breathing or consciousness is impaired.

Mental emergencies pose a particular challenge for patients and relatives because the patient and relatives are often overwhelmed by the situation. If there are suicidal thoughts, the patient should present him- or herself immediately to an emergency room.

“Patients who come to the emergency room because they cannot get appointments with their general practitioner or specialist, for whatever reason, are no emergency. We also see this in the emergency room from time to time,” said Dr. Schütz. Emergency rooms are not intended for this purpose. “And generally, these are not emergencies.”
 

Four of 10 Cases

The number of patients in emergency rooms has steadily increased in recent years. Statistically, only 4 out of 10 cases are genuine emergencies, as detailed surveys of patients in the emergency rooms of northern German hospitals have shown.

In the PiNo Nord cross-sectional study, Martin Scherer, MD, of University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf in Hamburg, Germany, and his team examined the reasons why patients visit the emergency room. They interviewed 1175 patients in five hospitals and documented the medical diagnoses. Patients classified as “immediately” or “very urgently” in need of treatment were excluded.

The surveyed patients were on average 41.8 years old, 52.9% were men, and 54.7% of the patients indicated a low urgency of treatment. About 41% of the patients visited the emergency room on their own initiative, 17% stated they were referred or entrusted by their general practitioner, and 8% were referred by a specialist in the emergency room.

The strongest predictors for low subjective treatment urgency were musculoskeletal trauma (odds ratio [OR], 2.18), skin afflictions (OR, 2.15), and the unavailability of an open general practitioner’s office (OR, 1.70).

According to Dr. Scherer and his colleagues, the reasons for visiting an emergency room are diverse and can be based on the perceived structural conditions and individual patient preferences in addition to the urgency of the health problem.
 

This story was translated from the Medscape German edition using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication. A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.