Serum IL-17 may aid in predicting the prognosis of community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: Serum IL-17 levels show a positive correlation with the severity and poor prognostic outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: In patients with CAP, serum IL-17 levels at admission increased in parallel with CAP severity scores, such as pneumonia severity index, and, after adjusting for confounding factors, showed a positive correlation with intensive care unit (ICU) admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01; P = .01), mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.10; P = .02), death (aOR, 1.05; P < .01), and hospital stay of 14 days or more (aOR 1.21; P = .01).

Study details: This was a prospective cohort study including 239 patients who were hospitalized for CAP.

Disclosures: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation Incubation Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, and Scientific Research of Health Commission in Anhui Province sponsored the study. None of the authors declared any conflict of interests.

Source: Feng CM et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:393 (Dec 2). Doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01770-6.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Serum IL-17 levels show a positive correlation with the severity and poor prognostic outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: In patients with CAP, serum IL-17 levels at admission increased in parallel with CAP severity scores, such as pneumonia severity index, and, after adjusting for confounding factors, showed a positive correlation with intensive care unit (ICU) admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01; P = .01), mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.10; P = .02), death (aOR, 1.05; P < .01), and hospital stay of 14 days or more (aOR 1.21; P = .01).

Study details: This was a prospective cohort study including 239 patients who were hospitalized for CAP.

Disclosures: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation Incubation Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, and Scientific Research of Health Commission in Anhui Province sponsored the study. None of the authors declared any conflict of interests.

Source: Feng CM et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:393 (Dec 2). Doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01770-6.

Key clinical point: Serum IL-17 levels show a positive correlation with the severity and poor prognostic outcomes in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: In patients with CAP, serum IL-17 levels at admission increased in parallel with CAP severity scores, such as pneumonia severity index, and, after adjusting for confounding factors, showed a positive correlation with intensive care unit (ICU) admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01; P = .01), mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.10; P = .02), death (aOR, 1.05; P < .01), and hospital stay of 14 days or more (aOR 1.21; P = .01).

Study details: This was a prospective cohort study including 239 patients who were hospitalized for CAP.

Disclosures: The National Natural Science Foundation of China, Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation Incubation Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, and Scientific Research of Health Commission in Anhui Province sponsored the study. None of the authors declared any conflict of interests.

Source: Feng CM et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:393 (Dec 2). Doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01770-6.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Antibiotics posing minimal AKI risk in community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: In patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the least risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) can be achieved by empiric treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin ± macrolide or a respiratory fluoroquinolone.

Main finding: Barring fluoroquinolones (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.06; 95% CI 0.98-1.14), all regimens offered a higher risk for AKI than a third-generation cephalosporin ± macrolide, with piperacillin/tazobactam + vancomycin being associated with the highest AKI odds (aOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.73-2.06).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study consisting of 449,535 adult patients hospitalized for CAP, of whom 3.1% developed AKI.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Le P et al. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 (Nov 15). Doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.2000716.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the least risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) can be achieved by empiric treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin ± macrolide or a respiratory fluoroquinolone.

Main finding: Barring fluoroquinolones (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.06; 95% CI 0.98-1.14), all regimens offered a higher risk for AKI than a third-generation cephalosporin ± macrolide, with piperacillin/tazobactam + vancomycin being associated with the highest AKI odds (aOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.73-2.06).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study consisting of 449,535 adult patients hospitalized for CAP, of whom 3.1% developed AKI.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Le P et al. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 (Nov 15). Doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.2000716.

 

Key clinical point: In patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), the least risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) can be achieved by empiric treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin ± macrolide or a respiratory fluoroquinolone.

Main finding: Barring fluoroquinolones (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.06; 95% CI 0.98-1.14), all regimens offered a higher risk for AKI than a third-generation cephalosporin ± macrolide, with piperacillin/tazobactam + vancomycin being associated with the highest AKI odds (aOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.73-2.06).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective cohort study consisting of 449,535 adult patients hospitalized for CAP, of whom 3.1% developed AKI.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Le P et al. Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 (Nov 15). Doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.2000716.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

How reliable is qSOFA in predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia?

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: Quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) is better than the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society minor criteria and worse than confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥ 65 years (CURB-65) in predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

 

Main finding: The predictive validity of qSOFA for mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.868; 95% CI 0.853-0.882) was higher than that of minor criteria (AUROC 0.824; P < .0001) and lower than that of CURB-65 (AUROC 0.919; P < .0001).

Study details: The data come from an observational prospective cohort study consisting of 2,116 adult patients with CAP.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province, Planned Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen Municipality, and Nonprofit Scientific Research Project of Futian District. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Guo Q et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2022(Feb);52:1-7 (Nov 24). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.029.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) is better than the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society minor criteria and worse than confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥ 65 years (CURB-65) in predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

 

Main finding: The predictive validity of qSOFA for mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.868; 95% CI 0.853-0.882) was higher than that of minor criteria (AUROC 0.824; P < .0001) and lower than that of CURB-65 (AUROC 0.919; P < .0001).

Study details: The data come from an observational prospective cohort study consisting of 2,116 adult patients with CAP.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province, Planned Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen Municipality, and Nonprofit Scientific Research Project of Futian District. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Guo Q et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2022(Feb);52:1-7 (Nov 24). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.029.

 

Key clinical point: Quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) is better than the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society minor criteria and worse than confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥ 65 years (CURB-65) in predicting mortality in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

 

Main finding: The predictive validity of qSOFA for mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.868; 95% CI 0.853-0.882) was higher than that of minor criteria (AUROC 0.824; P < .0001) and lower than that of CURB-65 (AUROC 0.919; P < .0001).

Study details: The data come from an observational prospective cohort study consisting of 2,116 adult patients with CAP.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Medical Science and Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province, Planned Science and Technology Project of Shenzhen Municipality, and Nonprofit Scientific Research Project of Futian District. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Guo Q et al. Am J Emerg Med. 2022(Feb);52:1-7 (Nov 24). Doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.029.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Mortality in community-acquired pneumonia is related to admission blood glucose levels

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: A positive association exists between blood glucose levels at hospital admission for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and 28-day mortality, and the strength of this association decreases with age.

Main finding: After adjusting for confounding factors, all patients exhibited a significant association between blood glucose levels at hospitalization and 28-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08; P < .01). After age stratification, this association was evidenced in both middle-aged (HR 4.48; P < .01) and elderly (HR 1.52; P = .05) patients, but was stronger in the former (P = .01).

Study details: This was a retrospective observational study including 1,656 patients aged 45 years who were hospitalized for CAP, of which 592 were middle-aged (45-64 years) and 1,064 were elderly (>65 years).

Disclosures: The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Shen Y et al. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:7775-7781 (Nov 6). Doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S331082.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: A positive association exists between blood glucose levels at hospital admission for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and 28-day mortality, and the strength of this association decreases with age.

Main finding: After adjusting for confounding factors, all patients exhibited a significant association between blood glucose levels at hospitalization and 28-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08; P < .01). After age stratification, this association was evidenced in both middle-aged (HR 4.48; P < .01) and elderly (HR 1.52; P = .05) patients, but was stronger in the former (P = .01).

Study details: This was a retrospective observational study including 1,656 patients aged 45 years who were hospitalized for CAP, of which 592 were middle-aged (45-64 years) and 1,064 were elderly (>65 years).

Disclosures: The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Shen Y et al. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:7775-7781 (Nov 6). Doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S331082.

Key clinical point: A positive association exists between blood glucose levels at hospital admission for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and 28-day mortality, and the strength of this association decreases with age.

Main finding: After adjusting for confounding factors, all patients exhibited a significant association between blood glucose levels at hospitalization and 28-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 2.08; P < .01). After age stratification, this association was evidenced in both middle-aged (HR 4.48; P < .01) and elderly (HR 1.52; P = .05) patients, but was stronger in the former (P = .01).

Study details: This was a retrospective observational study including 1,656 patients aged 45 years who were hospitalized for CAP, of which 592 were middle-aged (45-64 years) and 1,064 were elderly (>65 years).

Disclosures: The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Shen Y et al. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:7775-7781 (Nov 6). Doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S331082.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Most community-acquired bacterial pneumonia-causing pathogens succumb to lefamulin

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: Lefamulin is suitable as monotherapy against common community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP)-causing pathogens, both typical and atypical, including drug-resistant strains and those causing polymicrobial infections.

Main finding: Lefamulin was as effective as moxifloxacin in the microbiological intent-to-treat (microITT) population, exhibiting a similar early clinical response rate (89.3% vs. 93.0%; difference ‒3.7; 95% CI ‒7.9 to 0.5) and investigator assessment of clinical response success rate (83.2% vs. 86.7%; difference ‒3.3; 95% CI ‒8.6 to 2.0).

Study details: The study analyzed pooled data from the phase 3 noninferiority Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia 1 and 2 trials, including a total of 1,289 adult patients with CABP (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team risk classes II-V) who were randomly assigned to receive lefamulin or moxifloxacin. Of these, a baseline CABP pathogen was detected in 709 patients (microITT population).

Disclosures: Nabriva Therapeutics plc (Fort Washington, PA, USA) sponsored the study. Some of the authors, including the lead author, are former or current employees of or stockholders in Nabriva Therapeutics. A few others received research grants/consultation fees from various sources including Nabriva Therapeutics.

Source: Paukner S et al. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 (Nov 14). Doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.021.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Lefamulin is suitable as monotherapy against common community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP)-causing pathogens, both typical and atypical, including drug-resistant strains and those causing polymicrobial infections.

Main finding: Lefamulin was as effective as moxifloxacin in the microbiological intent-to-treat (microITT) population, exhibiting a similar early clinical response rate (89.3% vs. 93.0%; difference ‒3.7; 95% CI ‒7.9 to 0.5) and investigator assessment of clinical response success rate (83.2% vs. 86.7%; difference ‒3.3; 95% CI ‒8.6 to 2.0).

Study details: The study analyzed pooled data from the phase 3 noninferiority Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia 1 and 2 trials, including a total of 1,289 adult patients with CABP (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team risk classes II-V) who were randomly assigned to receive lefamulin or moxifloxacin. Of these, a baseline CABP pathogen was detected in 709 patients (microITT population).

Disclosures: Nabriva Therapeutics plc (Fort Washington, PA, USA) sponsored the study. Some of the authors, including the lead author, are former or current employees of or stockholders in Nabriva Therapeutics. A few others received research grants/consultation fees from various sources including Nabriva Therapeutics.

Source: Paukner S et al. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 (Nov 14). Doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.021.

Key clinical point: Lefamulin is suitable as monotherapy against common community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP)-causing pathogens, both typical and atypical, including drug-resistant strains and those causing polymicrobial infections.

Main finding: Lefamulin was as effective as moxifloxacin in the microbiological intent-to-treat (microITT) population, exhibiting a similar early clinical response rate (89.3% vs. 93.0%; difference ‒3.7; 95% CI ‒7.9 to 0.5) and investigator assessment of clinical response success rate (83.2% vs. 86.7%; difference ‒3.3; 95% CI ‒8.6 to 2.0).

Study details: The study analyzed pooled data from the phase 3 noninferiority Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia 1 and 2 trials, including a total of 1,289 adult patients with CABP (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team risk classes II-V) who were randomly assigned to receive lefamulin or moxifloxacin. Of these, a baseline CABP pathogen was detected in 709 patients (microITT population).

Disclosures: Nabriva Therapeutics plc (Fort Washington, PA, USA) sponsored the study. Some of the authors, including the lead author, are former or current employees of or stockholders in Nabriva Therapeutics. A few others received research grants/consultation fees from various sources including Nabriva Therapeutics.

Source: Paukner S et al. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 (Nov 14). Doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.021.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Collaborative stewardship steers appropriate antibiotic use against uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: Reinforcement of antibiotic stewardship by forming large multihospital collaboratives increases adherence to the appropriate 5-day therapy for uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) while decreasing adverse events.

Main finding: After adjusting for hospital clustering, the 20.9% predicted probability of patients receiving a 5-day antibiotic therapy increased to 45.9% (P < .001) over the study period, with the odds of this duration increasing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.14) and composite adverse events decreasing (aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99) with each successive quarter.

Study details: This study included 6,553 patients eligible for a 5-day therapy for uncomplicated CAP who were admitted to any of the 41 hospitals that participated in a state-wide collaborative quality initiative, Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, for the entire 3-year study period.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and a career development award from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to the lead author who, along with other authors, also declared receiving salary, research grants, or speaker honoraria from additional sources.

Source: Vaughn VM et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021:ciab950 (Nov 13). Doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab950.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Reinforcement of antibiotic stewardship by forming large multihospital collaboratives increases adherence to the appropriate 5-day therapy for uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) while decreasing adverse events.

Main finding: After adjusting for hospital clustering, the 20.9% predicted probability of patients receiving a 5-day antibiotic therapy increased to 45.9% (P < .001) over the study period, with the odds of this duration increasing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.14) and composite adverse events decreasing (aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99) with each successive quarter.

Study details: This study included 6,553 patients eligible for a 5-day therapy for uncomplicated CAP who were admitted to any of the 41 hospitals that participated in a state-wide collaborative quality initiative, Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, for the entire 3-year study period.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and a career development award from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to the lead author who, along with other authors, also declared receiving salary, research grants, or speaker honoraria from additional sources.

Source: Vaughn VM et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021:ciab950 (Nov 13). Doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab950.

Key clinical point: Reinforcement of antibiotic stewardship by forming large multihospital collaboratives increases adherence to the appropriate 5-day therapy for uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) while decreasing adverse events.

Main finding: After adjusting for hospital clustering, the 20.9% predicted probability of patients receiving a 5-day antibiotic therapy increased to 45.9% (P < .001) over the study period, with the odds of this duration increasing (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10; 95% CI 1.07-1.14) and composite adverse events decreasing (aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96-0.99) with each successive quarter.

Study details: This study included 6,553 patients eligible for a 5-day therapy for uncomplicated CAP who were admitted to any of the 41 hospitals that participated in a state-wide collaborative quality initiative, Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium, for the entire 3-year study period.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and a career development award from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to the lead author who, along with other authors, also declared receiving salary, research grants, or speaker honoraria from additional sources.

Source: Vaughn VM et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021:ciab950 (Nov 13). Doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab950.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

T2DM deteriorates clinical outcomes of severe community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: Patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) who also have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have poorer clinical outcomes than those without T2DM.

Main finding: Compared with patients with SCAP but without T2DM, those with both exhibited higher rates of hospital mortality (35.2% vs. 31.0%; P = .009), 14-day mortality (15.0% vs. 10.8%; P < .001), 30-day mortality (25.7% vs. 22.7%; P = .046), and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (30.8% vs. 26.5%; P = .005) along with a longer ICU length of stay (13 days vs. 12 days; P = .016).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective, single-center, observational study including 3,786 adult patients admitted to an ICU for SCAP, among whom 1,262 patients with T2DM were matched to 2,524 patients without T2DM.

Disclosures: The study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province, and National Key Research and Development Program of China. The authors declared having no conflict of interests.

Source: Huang D et al. Crit Care. 2021;25:419 (Dec 7). Doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03841-w.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) who also have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have poorer clinical outcomes than those without T2DM.

Main finding: Compared with patients with SCAP but without T2DM, those with both exhibited higher rates of hospital mortality (35.2% vs. 31.0%; P = .009), 14-day mortality (15.0% vs. 10.8%; P < .001), 30-day mortality (25.7% vs. 22.7%; P = .046), and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (30.8% vs. 26.5%; P = .005) along with a longer ICU length of stay (13 days vs. 12 days; P = .016).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective, single-center, observational study including 3,786 adult patients admitted to an ICU for SCAP, among whom 1,262 patients with T2DM were matched to 2,524 patients without T2DM.

Disclosures: The study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province, and National Key Research and Development Program of China. The authors declared having no conflict of interests.

Source: Huang D et al. Crit Care. 2021;25:419 (Dec 7). Doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03841-w.

Key clinical point: Patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) who also have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have poorer clinical outcomes than those without T2DM.

Main finding: Compared with patients with SCAP but without T2DM, those with both exhibited higher rates of hospital mortality (35.2% vs. 31.0%; P = .009), 14-day mortality (15.0% vs. 10.8%; P < .001), 30-day mortality (25.7% vs. 22.7%; P = .046), and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (30.8% vs. 26.5%; P = .005) along with a longer ICU length of stay (13 days vs. 12 days; P = .016).

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective, single-center, observational study including 3,786 adult patients admitted to an ICU for SCAP, among whom 1,262 patients with T2DM were matched to 2,524 patients without T2DM.

Disclosures: The study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province, and National Key Research and Development Program of China. The authors declared having no conflict of interests.

Source: Huang D et al. Crit Care. 2021;25:419 (Dec 7). Doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03841-w.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Cefoperazone-sulbactam: A potential therapeutic alternative to piperacillin-tazobactam in severe community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: Owing to a similar clinical efficacy and safety profile to piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL) could be used as an alternative for treating severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) in elderly patients.

Main finding: The odds for clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10; 95% CI 0.71-1.70), clinical effectiveness (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.62-1.59), all-cause mortality (aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.60-1.48), and pneumonia-related mortality (aOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.51-1.53) were similar between patients with SCAP receiving CFP-SUL and those receiving PIP-TAZ. Both drug combinations were equally well tolerated.

Study details: Based on the retrospective multicenter registry BATTLE, the study included 624 patients with SCAP among 317 others with hospital- or ventilator-acquired pneumonia who were aged 65 years when diagnosed with pneumonia.

Disclosures: The authors disclosed receiving no financial support for the study. None of the authors declared any conflict of interests.

Source: Huang CT et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021;106491 (Dec 4). Doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106491.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Owing to a similar clinical efficacy and safety profile to piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL) could be used as an alternative for treating severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) in elderly patients.

Main finding: The odds for clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10; 95% CI 0.71-1.70), clinical effectiveness (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.62-1.59), all-cause mortality (aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.60-1.48), and pneumonia-related mortality (aOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.51-1.53) were similar between patients with SCAP receiving CFP-SUL and those receiving PIP-TAZ. Both drug combinations were equally well tolerated.

Study details: Based on the retrospective multicenter registry BATTLE, the study included 624 patients with SCAP among 317 others with hospital- or ventilator-acquired pneumonia who were aged 65 years when diagnosed with pneumonia.

Disclosures: The authors disclosed receiving no financial support for the study. None of the authors declared any conflict of interests.

Source: Huang CT et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021;106491 (Dec 4). Doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106491.

Key clinical point: Owing to a similar clinical efficacy and safety profile to piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ), cefoperazone-sulbactam (CFP-SUL) could be used as an alternative for treating severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) in elderly patients.

Main finding: The odds for clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.10; 95% CI 0.71-1.70), clinical effectiveness (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.62-1.59), all-cause mortality (aOR 0.95; 95% CI 0.60-1.48), and pneumonia-related mortality (aOR 0.88; 95% CI 0.51-1.53) were similar between patients with SCAP receiving CFP-SUL and those receiving PIP-TAZ. Both drug combinations were equally well tolerated.

Study details: Based on the retrospective multicenter registry BATTLE, the study included 624 patients with SCAP among 317 others with hospital- or ventilator-acquired pneumonia who were aged 65 years when diagnosed with pneumonia.

Disclosures: The authors disclosed receiving no financial support for the study. None of the authors declared any conflict of interests.

Source: Huang CT et al. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021;106491 (Dec 4). Doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106491.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

SARS-CoV-2 causes life-threatening pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Article Type
Changed
Sun, 01/02/2022 - 13:15

Key clinical point: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) leads to poorer clinical outcomes than non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Main finding: After adjustment for inverse propensity weighting (IPW) and pneumonia severity index, patients with COPD and SARS-CoV-2 CAP had higher odds of intensive care unit (ICU) admission during hospitalization (IPW-odds ratio [OR] 2.41), invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (IPW-OR 2.23), a cardiovascular event (IPW-OR 4.98), and in-hospital mortality (IPW-OR 7.31) and a longer length of hospital stay (all P < .001) than patients with COPD  who were non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Study details: The analysis compared 96 hospitalized patients with COPD and SARS-CoV-2 CAP with 1,129 patients with COPD and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP included in the Burden of COVID-19 study and the University of Louisville Pneumonia Study, 2 large observational retrospective and prospective studies, respectively.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville. None of the authors reported any conflict of interests.

Source: Sheikh D et al. Respir Med. 2021’191:106714 (Dec 8). Doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106714.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) leads to poorer clinical outcomes than non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Main finding: After adjustment for inverse propensity weighting (IPW) and pneumonia severity index, patients with COPD and SARS-CoV-2 CAP had higher odds of intensive care unit (ICU) admission during hospitalization (IPW-odds ratio [OR] 2.41), invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (IPW-OR 2.23), a cardiovascular event (IPW-OR 4.98), and in-hospital mortality (IPW-OR 7.31) and a longer length of hospital stay (all P < .001) than patients with COPD  who were non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Study details: The analysis compared 96 hospitalized patients with COPD and SARS-CoV-2 CAP with 1,129 patients with COPD and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP included in the Burden of COVID-19 study and the University of Louisville Pneumonia Study, 2 large observational retrospective and prospective studies, respectively.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville. None of the authors reported any conflict of interests.

Source: Sheikh D et al. Respir Med. 2021’191:106714 (Dec 8). Doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106714.

Key clinical point: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) leads to poorer clinical outcomes than non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Main finding: After adjustment for inverse propensity weighting (IPW) and pneumonia severity index, patients with COPD and SARS-CoV-2 CAP had higher odds of intensive care unit (ICU) admission during hospitalization (IPW-odds ratio [OR] 2.41), invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (IPW-OR 2.23), a cardiovascular event (IPW-OR 4.98), and in-hospital mortality (IPW-OR 7.31) and a longer length of hospital stay (all P < .001) than patients with COPD  who were non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Study details: The analysis compared 96 hospitalized patients with COPD and SARS-CoV-2 CAP with 1,129 patients with COPD and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP included in the Burden of COVID-19 study and the University of Louisville Pneumonia Study, 2 large observational retrospective and prospective studies, respectively.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville. None of the authors reported any conflict of interests.

Source: Sheikh D et al. Respir Med. 2021’191:106714 (Dec 8). Doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106714.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 16:00
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Dupilumab+TCS combo effective for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis across different anatomic regions

Article Type
Changed
Wed, 03/23/2022 - 20:20

Key clinical point: Combination of dupilumab and topical corticosteroids (TCS) improved signs of atopic dermatitis (AD) rapidly and consistently across all anatomic regions in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Major finding: Dupilumab+TCS vs. placebo+TCS significantly improved infiltration/papulation score in head and neck, trunk, and upper extremities; excoriation score in trunk, upper, and lower extremities; lichenification score in trunk by week 2; and erythema score in head and neck and trunk by week 4 (all P ≤ .001), with all improvements sustained until week 52 (P ≤ .001).

Study details: Findings are post hoc analysis of 52-week phase 3 LIBERTY AD CHRONOS trial including 421 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive dupilumab+TCS or placebo+TCS.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Some of the authors declared receiving grants and personal fees or serving as a consultant, speaker, advisory board member, and investigator for various sources. Some of the authors declared being employees or shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals or Sanofi Genzyme.

Source: Blauvelt A et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 (Nov 22). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00638-1.

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Combination of dupilumab and topical corticosteroids (TCS) improved signs of atopic dermatitis (AD) rapidly and consistently across all anatomic regions in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Major finding: Dupilumab+TCS vs. placebo+TCS significantly improved infiltration/papulation score in head and neck, trunk, and upper extremities; excoriation score in trunk, upper, and lower extremities; lichenification score in trunk by week 2; and erythema score in head and neck and trunk by week 4 (all P ≤ .001), with all improvements sustained until week 52 (P ≤ .001).

Study details: Findings are post hoc analysis of 52-week phase 3 LIBERTY AD CHRONOS trial including 421 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive dupilumab+TCS or placebo+TCS.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Some of the authors declared receiving grants and personal fees or serving as a consultant, speaker, advisory board member, and investigator for various sources. Some of the authors declared being employees or shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals or Sanofi Genzyme.

Source: Blauvelt A et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 (Nov 22). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00638-1.

 

Key clinical point: Combination of dupilumab and topical corticosteroids (TCS) improved signs of atopic dermatitis (AD) rapidly and consistently across all anatomic regions in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Major finding: Dupilumab+TCS vs. placebo+TCS significantly improved infiltration/papulation score in head and neck, trunk, and upper extremities; excoriation score in trunk, upper, and lower extremities; lichenification score in trunk by week 2; and erythema score in head and neck and trunk by week 4 (all P ≤ .001), with all improvements sustained until week 52 (P ≤ .001).

Study details: Findings are post hoc analysis of 52-week phase 3 LIBERTY AD CHRONOS trial including 421 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomly assigned to receive dupilumab+TCS or placebo+TCS.

Disclosures: This study was funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Some of the authors declared receiving grants and personal fees or serving as a consultant, speaker, advisory board member, and investigator for various sources. Some of the authors declared being employees or shareholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals or Sanofi Genzyme.

Source: Blauvelt A et al. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 (Nov 22). Doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00638-1.

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Atopic Dermatitis January 2022
Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Un-Gate On Date
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Sat, 12/25/2021 - 15:15
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
325140.4
Activity ID
77941
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
RINVOQ [ 5260 ]