Lower hemoglobin threshold did not affect outcomes in septic shock

Adopt threshold of 7 g/dL
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Lower hemoglobin threshold did not affect outcomes in septic shock

Patients with septic shock had similar outcomes when transfused at hemoglobin thresholds of 7 g/dL as compared with 9 g/dL, investigators reported online Oct. 1 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Mortality at 90 days, use of life support, number of days alive and out of the hospital, number of ischemic events, and severe adverse reactions to blood in the intensive care unit (ICU) all were similar between the two groups, said Dr. Lars B. Holst at Rigshospitalet and the University of Copenhagen and his associates. At the same time, patients treated at the lower threshold received three times as many units of blood as did those treated at the higher threshold (median of 4 units and 1 unit, respectively), the researchers reported.

For the multicenter Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial, the investigators randomized 998 ICU patients with septic shock to receive 1 unit of leukoreduced red cells when their hemoglobin level was either 9 g/dL or less (higher threshold) or 7 g/dL or less (lower threshold). Ninety days later, 43% of patients in the 7-g/dL threshold group had died, compared with 45% of the higher-threshold group, a nonsignificant difference, the investigators said. Controlling for baseline risk factors did not affect the finding, they reported (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 1 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617]).

Rates of ischemic events and the need for life support also did not differ significantly between the two groups, Dr. Holst and his associates reported.

The study was funded by the Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, and several Scandinavian research foundations. Two coauthors reported financial relationships with Pharmacosmos, CSL Behring, and other companies. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

Body

Holst and colleagues provide definitive evidence that a restrictive approach to blood transfusion not only reduced blood use by half but also did not cause harm to critically ill patients with septic shock.

We believe it has become abundantly clear that a transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL should become the new normal, recommended in all critically ill patients, including those with severe sepsis and septic shock. To speed up adoption, we should ensure that clinical practice guidelines are rapidly updated with new information. Indeed, most transfusion guidelines have already been updated, but this is not so for sepsis guidelines.

Evidence stills remains weak in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. It may yet be proved that this distinct group of patients benefits from higher hemoglobin concentrations of 9 or 10 g/dL. Oxygen delivery to the myocardium is flow dependent since the heart extracts a high percentage of oxygen, and myocardial ischemia may be precipitated by low hemoglobin concentrations.

Paul C. Hébert, M.D., is at the Montreal University Health Center. Jeffrey L. Carson, M.D., is at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, New Jersey. These remarks were taken from their editorial accompanying Dr. Holst’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 1 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1408976]).

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
septic shock, hemoglobin threshold, life support, ischemic events, intensive care unit, ICU, Dr. Lars B. Holst,
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

Holst and colleagues provide definitive evidence that a restrictive approach to blood transfusion not only reduced blood use by half but also did not cause harm to critically ill patients with septic shock.

We believe it has become abundantly clear that a transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL should become the new normal, recommended in all critically ill patients, including those with severe sepsis and septic shock. To speed up adoption, we should ensure that clinical practice guidelines are rapidly updated with new information. Indeed, most transfusion guidelines have already been updated, but this is not so for sepsis guidelines.

Evidence stills remains weak in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. It may yet be proved that this distinct group of patients benefits from higher hemoglobin concentrations of 9 or 10 g/dL. Oxygen delivery to the myocardium is flow dependent since the heart extracts a high percentage of oxygen, and myocardial ischemia may be precipitated by low hemoglobin concentrations.

Paul C. Hébert, M.D., is at the Montreal University Health Center. Jeffrey L. Carson, M.D., is at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, New Jersey. These remarks were taken from their editorial accompanying Dr. Holst’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 1 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1408976]).

Body

Holst and colleagues provide definitive evidence that a restrictive approach to blood transfusion not only reduced blood use by half but also did not cause harm to critically ill patients with septic shock.

We believe it has become abundantly clear that a transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL should become the new normal, recommended in all critically ill patients, including those with severe sepsis and septic shock. To speed up adoption, we should ensure that clinical practice guidelines are rapidly updated with new information. Indeed, most transfusion guidelines have already been updated, but this is not so for sepsis guidelines.

Evidence stills remains weak in patients with an acute coronary syndrome. It may yet be proved that this distinct group of patients benefits from higher hemoglobin concentrations of 9 or 10 g/dL. Oxygen delivery to the myocardium is flow dependent since the heart extracts a high percentage of oxygen, and myocardial ischemia may be precipitated by low hemoglobin concentrations.

Paul C. Hébert, M.D., is at the Montreal University Health Center. Jeffrey L. Carson, M.D., is at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, New Jersey. These remarks were taken from their editorial accompanying Dr. Holst’s report (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 1 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1408976]).

Title
Adopt threshold of 7 g/dL
Adopt threshold of 7 g/dL

Patients with septic shock had similar outcomes when transfused at hemoglobin thresholds of 7 g/dL as compared with 9 g/dL, investigators reported online Oct. 1 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Mortality at 90 days, use of life support, number of days alive and out of the hospital, number of ischemic events, and severe adverse reactions to blood in the intensive care unit (ICU) all were similar between the two groups, said Dr. Lars B. Holst at Rigshospitalet and the University of Copenhagen and his associates. At the same time, patients treated at the lower threshold received three times as many units of blood as did those treated at the higher threshold (median of 4 units and 1 unit, respectively), the researchers reported.

For the multicenter Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial, the investigators randomized 998 ICU patients with septic shock to receive 1 unit of leukoreduced red cells when their hemoglobin level was either 9 g/dL or less (higher threshold) or 7 g/dL or less (lower threshold). Ninety days later, 43% of patients in the 7-g/dL threshold group had died, compared with 45% of the higher-threshold group, a nonsignificant difference, the investigators said. Controlling for baseline risk factors did not affect the finding, they reported (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 1 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617]).

Rates of ischemic events and the need for life support also did not differ significantly between the two groups, Dr. Holst and his associates reported.

The study was funded by the Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, and several Scandinavian research foundations. Two coauthors reported financial relationships with Pharmacosmos, CSL Behring, and other companies. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Patients with septic shock had similar outcomes when transfused at hemoglobin thresholds of 7 g/dL as compared with 9 g/dL, investigators reported online Oct. 1 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Mortality at 90 days, use of life support, number of days alive and out of the hospital, number of ischemic events, and severe adverse reactions to blood in the intensive care unit (ICU) all were similar between the two groups, said Dr. Lars B. Holst at Rigshospitalet and the University of Copenhagen and his associates. At the same time, patients treated at the lower threshold received three times as many units of blood as did those treated at the higher threshold (median of 4 units and 1 unit, respectively), the researchers reported.

For the multicenter Transfusion Requirements in Septic Shock (TRISS) trial, the investigators randomized 998 ICU patients with septic shock to receive 1 unit of leukoreduced red cells when their hemoglobin level was either 9 g/dL or less (higher threshold) or 7 g/dL or less (lower threshold). Ninety days later, 43% of patients in the 7-g/dL threshold group had died, compared with 45% of the higher-threshold group, a nonsignificant difference, the investigators said. Controlling for baseline risk factors did not affect the finding, they reported (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Oct. 1 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617]).

Rates of ischemic events and the need for life support also did not differ significantly between the two groups, Dr. Holst and his associates reported.

The study was funded by the Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, and several Scandinavian research foundations. Two coauthors reported financial relationships with Pharmacosmos, CSL Behring, and other companies. The other authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Lower hemoglobin threshold did not affect outcomes in septic shock
Display Headline
Lower hemoglobin threshold did not affect outcomes in septic shock
Legacy Keywords
septic shock, hemoglobin threshold, life support, ischemic events, intensive care unit, ICU, Dr. Lars B. Holst,
Legacy Keywords
septic shock, hemoglobin threshold, life support, ischemic events, intensive care unit, ICU, Dr. Lars B. Holst,
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Drug Combinations Found to Increase Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk

'Real world' results
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Drug Combinations Found to Increase Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk

Combining nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding by up to 190% beyond the baseline risk found for NSAID monotherapy, researchers reported in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Patients also faced excess risks of upper GI bleeding when they took corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants together with low-dose aspirin or nonselective NSAIDs, although the effect was not seen for COX-2 inhibitors, said Dr. Gwen Masclee at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands and her associates.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings should help clinicians tailor treatments to minimize chances of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for elderly patients who often take multiple drugs, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 [doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.007]).

The researchers analyzed 114,835 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, including all gastroduodenal ulcers and hemorrhages extracted from seven electronic health record databases from the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark. Three databases included primary care data, and four were administrative claims data, the investigators said. Cases served as their own controls, they noted.

Monotherapy with prescription nonselective NSAIDs increased the chances of an upper gastrointestinal bleed by 4.3 times, compared with not using any of the drugs studied (95% confidence interval, 4.1-4.4), the researchers said. Notably, bleeding risk from taking either nonselective NSAIDs or corticosteroids was the same, they said, adding that previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings on the topic. The incidence ratios for monotherapy with low-dose aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors were slightly lower at 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7-3.2), respectively, they added.

Combining nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs led to excess risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding of 1.6 (95% CI, 0.5-2.6), 1.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.4), and 0.49 (–0.05-1.03), respectively, the researchers reported. "From a biological point of view, this interaction seems plausible because SSRIs decrease the serotonin level, resulting in impaired thrombocyte aggregation and an increased risk of bleeding in general," they said.

Corticosteroids combined with nonselective NSAIDs led to the greatest increases in bleeding risk, with an incidence ratio of 12.8 (95% CI, 11.1-14.7), compared with nonuse of any drug studied, and an excess risk of 5.5 (3.7-7.3), compared with NSAID use alone, said the researchers. Adding aldosterone antagonists to nonselective NSAIDs led to an excess risk of 4.46, compared with using nonselective NSAIDs alone, they reported (95% CI, 1.79-7.13).

Because the study did not capture over-the-counter NSAID prescriptions, it could have underestimated use of these drugs, the investigators said. Also, changes in health or NSAID use during the study could have created residual confounding, although sensitivity analyses did not reveal problems, they reported. They added that misclassification of some data could have led them to underestimate risks. "Finally, we did not take any carryover effect or dose of drug exposure into account, which potentially limits the generalizability concerning causality of the associations," they concluded.

Five authors reported employment or other financial support from Erasmus University Medical Center, AstraZeneca, Janssen, PHARMO Institute, and the European Medicines Agency. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interests.

References

Click for Credit Link
Body

Gastrointestinal toxicity is the major issue limiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use. The excess annual risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 1,000 patients is about 1 with low-dose aspirin, about 2 with coxibs, and about 4-6 with traditional NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen). However, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding increases markedly with several factors, including the use of concomitant medications.

Ideally, large randomized trials comparing NSAIDs with and without a concomitant medication would inform our assessment of risk. However, few such trials are available, so we commonly rely on observational database studies, such as that of Masclee et al. These studies have the important benefit of large sample size and "real world" results, but also have potential limitations, including reliability of data (for example, accuracy of diagnostic coding) and potential bias because of unequal distribution of confounding factors between cases and controls.

Masclee et al. report significant synergy (more than additive risk) of traditional NSAIDs with corticosteroids, SSRIs, aldosterone antagonists, and antithrombotic agents other than low-dose aspirin (although risk was increased with traditional NSAIDs plus low-dose aspirin). Low-dose aspirin was synergistic with antithrombotic agents and corticosteroids, while coxibs were synergistic with low-dose aspirin and SSRIs.

The results of Masclee et al. support current North American guidelines, which suggest use of proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol for traditional NSAID users taking concomitant medications such as antithrombotics, corticosteroids, or SSRIs, and use of PPIs for low-dose-aspirin users taking antithrombotics or taking corticosteroids if greater than or equal to 60 years old. Their results also suggest further evaluation of aldosterone antagonists is warranted as another possible risk factor.

Dr. Loren Laine is professor of medicine, department of internal medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. He is on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards of Eisai, BMS, and Bayer; and is a consultant for AstraZeneca.

Author and Disclosure Information

Amy Karon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory, drugs, serotonin, reuptake inhibitors, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, NSAID monotherapy, Gastroenterology, corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, anticoagulants, Gwen Masclee, Erasmus Medical Center,
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Amy Karon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Author and Disclosure Information

Amy Karon, Family Practice News Digital Network

Body

Gastrointestinal toxicity is the major issue limiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use. The excess annual risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 1,000 patients is about 1 with low-dose aspirin, about 2 with coxibs, and about 4-6 with traditional NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen). However, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding increases markedly with several factors, including the use of concomitant medications.

Ideally, large randomized trials comparing NSAIDs with and without a concomitant medication would inform our assessment of risk. However, few such trials are available, so we commonly rely on observational database studies, such as that of Masclee et al. These studies have the important benefit of large sample size and "real world" results, but also have potential limitations, including reliability of data (for example, accuracy of diagnostic coding) and potential bias because of unequal distribution of confounding factors between cases and controls.

Masclee et al. report significant synergy (more than additive risk) of traditional NSAIDs with corticosteroids, SSRIs, aldosterone antagonists, and antithrombotic agents other than low-dose aspirin (although risk was increased with traditional NSAIDs plus low-dose aspirin). Low-dose aspirin was synergistic with antithrombotic agents and corticosteroids, while coxibs were synergistic with low-dose aspirin and SSRIs.

The results of Masclee et al. support current North American guidelines, which suggest use of proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol for traditional NSAID users taking concomitant medications such as antithrombotics, corticosteroids, or SSRIs, and use of PPIs for low-dose-aspirin users taking antithrombotics or taking corticosteroids if greater than or equal to 60 years old. Their results also suggest further evaluation of aldosterone antagonists is warranted as another possible risk factor.

Dr. Loren Laine is professor of medicine, department of internal medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. He is on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards of Eisai, BMS, and Bayer; and is a consultant for AstraZeneca.

Body

Gastrointestinal toxicity is the major issue limiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use. The excess annual risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 1,000 patients is about 1 with low-dose aspirin, about 2 with coxibs, and about 4-6 with traditional NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen). However, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding increases markedly with several factors, including the use of concomitant medications.

Ideally, large randomized trials comparing NSAIDs with and without a concomitant medication would inform our assessment of risk. However, few such trials are available, so we commonly rely on observational database studies, such as that of Masclee et al. These studies have the important benefit of large sample size and "real world" results, but also have potential limitations, including reliability of data (for example, accuracy of diagnostic coding) and potential bias because of unequal distribution of confounding factors between cases and controls.

Masclee et al. report significant synergy (more than additive risk) of traditional NSAIDs with corticosteroids, SSRIs, aldosterone antagonists, and antithrombotic agents other than low-dose aspirin (although risk was increased with traditional NSAIDs plus low-dose aspirin). Low-dose aspirin was synergistic with antithrombotic agents and corticosteroids, while coxibs were synergistic with low-dose aspirin and SSRIs.

The results of Masclee et al. support current North American guidelines, which suggest use of proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol for traditional NSAID users taking concomitant medications such as antithrombotics, corticosteroids, or SSRIs, and use of PPIs for low-dose-aspirin users taking antithrombotics or taking corticosteroids if greater than or equal to 60 years old. Their results also suggest further evaluation of aldosterone antagonists is warranted as another possible risk factor.

Dr. Loren Laine is professor of medicine, department of internal medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. He is on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards of Eisai, BMS, and Bayer; and is a consultant for AstraZeneca.

Title
'Real world' results
'Real world' results

Combining nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding by up to 190% beyond the baseline risk found for NSAID monotherapy, researchers reported in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Patients also faced excess risks of upper GI bleeding when they took corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants together with low-dose aspirin or nonselective NSAIDs, although the effect was not seen for COX-2 inhibitors, said Dr. Gwen Masclee at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands and her associates.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings should help clinicians tailor treatments to minimize chances of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for elderly patients who often take multiple drugs, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 [doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.007]).

The researchers analyzed 114,835 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, including all gastroduodenal ulcers and hemorrhages extracted from seven electronic health record databases from the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark. Three databases included primary care data, and four were administrative claims data, the investigators said. Cases served as their own controls, they noted.

Monotherapy with prescription nonselective NSAIDs increased the chances of an upper gastrointestinal bleed by 4.3 times, compared with not using any of the drugs studied (95% confidence interval, 4.1-4.4), the researchers said. Notably, bleeding risk from taking either nonselective NSAIDs or corticosteroids was the same, they said, adding that previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings on the topic. The incidence ratios for monotherapy with low-dose aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors were slightly lower at 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7-3.2), respectively, they added.

Combining nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs led to excess risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding of 1.6 (95% CI, 0.5-2.6), 1.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.4), and 0.49 (–0.05-1.03), respectively, the researchers reported. "From a biological point of view, this interaction seems plausible because SSRIs decrease the serotonin level, resulting in impaired thrombocyte aggregation and an increased risk of bleeding in general," they said.

Corticosteroids combined with nonselective NSAIDs led to the greatest increases in bleeding risk, with an incidence ratio of 12.8 (95% CI, 11.1-14.7), compared with nonuse of any drug studied, and an excess risk of 5.5 (3.7-7.3), compared with NSAID use alone, said the researchers. Adding aldosterone antagonists to nonselective NSAIDs led to an excess risk of 4.46, compared with using nonselective NSAIDs alone, they reported (95% CI, 1.79-7.13).

Because the study did not capture over-the-counter NSAID prescriptions, it could have underestimated use of these drugs, the investigators said. Also, changes in health or NSAID use during the study could have created residual confounding, although sensitivity analyses did not reveal problems, they reported. They added that misclassification of some data could have led them to underestimate risks. "Finally, we did not take any carryover effect or dose of drug exposure into account, which potentially limits the generalizability concerning causality of the associations," they concluded.

Five authors reported employment or other financial support from Erasmus University Medical Center, AstraZeneca, Janssen, PHARMO Institute, and the European Medicines Agency. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interests.

Combining nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding by up to 190% beyond the baseline risk found for NSAID monotherapy, researchers reported in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Patients also faced excess risks of upper GI bleeding when they took corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants together with low-dose aspirin or nonselective NSAIDs, although the effect was not seen for COX-2 inhibitors, said Dr. Gwen Masclee at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands and her associates.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings should help clinicians tailor treatments to minimize chances of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for elderly patients who often take multiple drugs, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 [doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.007]).

The researchers analyzed 114,835 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, including all gastroduodenal ulcers and hemorrhages extracted from seven electronic health record databases from the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark. Three databases included primary care data, and four were administrative claims data, the investigators said. Cases served as their own controls, they noted.

Monotherapy with prescription nonselective NSAIDs increased the chances of an upper gastrointestinal bleed by 4.3 times, compared with not using any of the drugs studied (95% confidence interval, 4.1-4.4), the researchers said. Notably, bleeding risk from taking either nonselective NSAIDs or corticosteroids was the same, they said, adding that previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings on the topic. The incidence ratios for monotherapy with low-dose aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors were slightly lower at 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7-3.2), respectively, they added.

Combining nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs led to excess risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding of 1.6 (95% CI, 0.5-2.6), 1.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.4), and 0.49 (–0.05-1.03), respectively, the researchers reported. "From a biological point of view, this interaction seems plausible because SSRIs decrease the serotonin level, resulting in impaired thrombocyte aggregation and an increased risk of bleeding in general," they said.

Corticosteroids combined with nonselective NSAIDs led to the greatest increases in bleeding risk, with an incidence ratio of 12.8 (95% CI, 11.1-14.7), compared with nonuse of any drug studied, and an excess risk of 5.5 (3.7-7.3), compared with NSAID use alone, said the researchers. Adding aldosterone antagonists to nonselective NSAIDs led to an excess risk of 4.46, compared with using nonselective NSAIDs alone, they reported (95% CI, 1.79-7.13).

Because the study did not capture over-the-counter NSAID prescriptions, it could have underestimated use of these drugs, the investigators said. Also, changes in health or NSAID use during the study could have created residual confounding, although sensitivity analyses did not reveal problems, they reported. They added that misclassification of some data could have led them to underestimate risks. "Finally, we did not take any carryover effect or dose of drug exposure into account, which potentially limits the generalizability concerning causality of the associations," they concluded.

Five authors reported employment or other financial support from Erasmus University Medical Center, AstraZeneca, Janssen, PHARMO Institute, and the European Medicines Agency. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interests.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Drug Combinations Found to Increase Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk
Display Headline
Drug Combinations Found to Increase Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Risk
Legacy Keywords
nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory, drugs, serotonin, reuptake inhibitors, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, NSAID monotherapy, Gastroenterology, corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, anticoagulants, Gwen Masclee, Erasmus Medical Center,
Legacy Keywords
nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory, drugs, serotonin, reuptake inhibitors, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, NSAID monotherapy, Gastroenterology, corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, anticoagulants, Gwen Masclee, Erasmus Medical Center,
Article Source

FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Model could cut CT scans of patients with Crohn’s disease by 43%

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Model could cut CT scans of patients with Crohn’s disease by 43%

A risk stratification model that determined whether patients with Crohn’s disease needed computed tomography cut scans of these patients in emergency departments by 43%, with a miss rate of only 0.8%, researchers reported online in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Computed tomography scans yield nonsignificant findings for almost one-third of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who present to emergency departments, said Dr. Shail Govani of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and his associates. By using their model to identify patients with serious gastrointestinal complications as opposed to straightforward intestinal inflammation, emergency departments could prevent more than 250 cancer cases and save more than $80 million per decade in the United States, the investigators added.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Patients with CD may be exposed to increasing cumulative radiation levels, and 30% of this exposure occurs in emergency departments, with 75% due to CT scans, the researchers said (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014 [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.036]).

For the study, the investigators retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records from the University of Michigan from 2000 through 2011, identifying 613 adults with CD who made 1,095 visits that included CT scans within 24 hours of presentation. The researchers then modeled associations between laboratory values and perforation, abscess, or other serious complications as opposed to intestinal inflammation.

Patients averaged 1.8 CT scans during the decade-long study period, and the overall rate of CT scans during that time rose from 63% to 87%, the investigators said. Only 16.8% of scans revealed a complication that would change clinical management, they reported.

Only C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly associated with complications (odds ratio for CRP, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15; P less than .001; odds ratio for ESR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P less than .001), the researchers said. Adding ESR to 5 x CRP and not scanning patients with a resulting value of 10 or less would avoid CT scans in 18.5% of patients, they reported. But by using the more complex logistic regression model instead of the simpler equation, scans could be avoided for 43.0% of patients, with a miss rate of 0.8%, they said.

Based on the study, patients assessed as likely to have complications should undergo a standard CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with nonbarium contrast to avoid barium peritonitis, said Dr. Govani and associates. Other patients should forego CT scans, have a consult with a gastroenterologist prior to further imaging, or undergo lower-radiation CT enterography, depending on presenting signs and probability of inflammation, they added.

The researchers said they were unable to construct good models that included obstruction as an outcome. Patients with suspected obstructions should have abdominal x-rays and then CT if an obstruction remained likely, they said.

"These models are limited in that they are retrospective and represent data from one center," the investigators added. "Although our internal validation with 10-fold cross-validation shows that these models have good performance characteristics, further external validation studies are needed to determine whether these models are generalizable to CD patients elsewhere."

The authors are prospectively testing the algorithms and hope to continue to validate and study them in emergency departments, they said.

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Working Group, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and UCB supported the research. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

References

Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Sections
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

A risk stratification model that determined whether patients with Crohn’s disease needed computed tomography cut scans of these patients in emergency departments by 43%, with a miss rate of only 0.8%, researchers reported online in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Computed tomography scans yield nonsignificant findings for almost one-third of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who present to emergency departments, said Dr. Shail Govani of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and his associates. By using their model to identify patients with serious gastrointestinal complications as opposed to straightforward intestinal inflammation, emergency departments could prevent more than 250 cancer cases and save more than $80 million per decade in the United States, the investigators added.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Patients with CD may be exposed to increasing cumulative radiation levels, and 30% of this exposure occurs in emergency departments, with 75% due to CT scans, the researchers said (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014 [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.036]).

For the study, the investigators retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records from the University of Michigan from 2000 through 2011, identifying 613 adults with CD who made 1,095 visits that included CT scans within 24 hours of presentation. The researchers then modeled associations between laboratory values and perforation, abscess, or other serious complications as opposed to intestinal inflammation.

Patients averaged 1.8 CT scans during the decade-long study period, and the overall rate of CT scans during that time rose from 63% to 87%, the investigators said. Only 16.8% of scans revealed a complication that would change clinical management, they reported.

Only C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly associated with complications (odds ratio for CRP, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15; P less than .001; odds ratio for ESR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P less than .001), the researchers said. Adding ESR to 5 x CRP and not scanning patients with a resulting value of 10 or less would avoid CT scans in 18.5% of patients, they reported. But by using the more complex logistic regression model instead of the simpler equation, scans could be avoided for 43.0% of patients, with a miss rate of 0.8%, they said.

Based on the study, patients assessed as likely to have complications should undergo a standard CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with nonbarium contrast to avoid barium peritonitis, said Dr. Govani and associates. Other patients should forego CT scans, have a consult with a gastroenterologist prior to further imaging, or undergo lower-radiation CT enterography, depending on presenting signs and probability of inflammation, they added.

The researchers said they were unable to construct good models that included obstruction as an outcome. Patients with suspected obstructions should have abdominal x-rays and then CT if an obstruction remained likely, they said.

"These models are limited in that they are retrospective and represent data from one center," the investigators added. "Although our internal validation with 10-fold cross-validation shows that these models have good performance characteristics, further external validation studies are needed to determine whether these models are generalizable to CD patients elsewhere."

The authors are prospectively testing the algorithms and hope to continue to validate and study them in emergency departments, they said.

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Working Group, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and UCB supported the research. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

A risk stratification model that determined whether patients with Crohn’s disease needed computed tomography cut scans of these patients in emergency departments by 43%, with a miss rate of only 0.8%, researchers reported online in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

Computed tomography scans yield nonsignificant findings for almost one-third of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) who present to emergency departments, said Dr. Shail Govani of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and his associates. By using their model to identify patients with serious gastrointestinal complications as opposed to straightforward intestinal inflammation, emergency departments could prevent more than 250 cancer cases and save more than $80 million per decade in the United States, the investigators added.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

Patients with CD may be exposed to increasing cumulative radiation levels, and 30% of this exposure occurs in emergency departments, with 75% due to CT scans, the researchers said (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014 [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.036]).

For the study, the investigators retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records from the University of Michigan from 2000 through 2011, identifying 613 adults with CD who made 1,095 visits that included CT scans within 24 hours of presentation. The researchers then modeled associations between laboratory values and perforation, abscess, or other serious complications as opposed to intestinal inflammation.

Patients averaged 1.8 CT scans during the decade-long study period, and the overall rate of CT scans during that time rose from 63% to 87%, the investigators said. Only 16.8% of scans revealed a complication that would change clinical management, they reported.

Only C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly associated with complications (odds ratio for CRP, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.15; P less than .001; odds ratio for ESR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P less than .001), the researchers said. Adding ESR to 5 x CRP and not scanning patients with a resulting value of 10 or less would avoid CT scans in 18.5% of patients, they reported. But by using the more complex logistic regression model instead of the simpler equation, scans could be avoided for 43.0% of patients, with a miss rate of 0.8%, they said.

Based on the study, patients assessed as likely to have complications should undergo a standard CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with nonbarium contrast to avoid barium peritonitis, said Dr. Govani and associates. Other patients should forego CT scans, have a consult with a gastroenterologist prior to further imaging, or undergo lower-radiation CT enterography, depending on presenting signs and probability of inflammation, they added.

The researchers said they were unable to construct good models that included obstruction as an outcome. Patients with suspected obstructions should have abdominal x-rays and then CT if an obstruction remained likely, they said.

"These models are limited in that they are retrospective and represent data from one center," the investigators added. "Although our internal validation with 10-fold cross-validation shows that these models have good performance characteristics, further external validation studies are needed to determine whether these models are generalizable to CD patients elsewhere."

The authors are prospectively testing the algorithms and hope to continue to validate and study them in emergency departments, they said.

The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Working Group, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and UCB supported the research. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Model could cut CT scans of patients with Crohn’s disease by 43%
Display Headline
Model could cut CT scans of patients with Crohn’s disease by 43%
Sections
Article Source

FROM CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: A risk-stratification model could cut the use of computed tomography scans in emergency department patients with Crohn’s disease by 43%, while missing less than 1% of emergencies.

Major finding: Adding ESR to 5 x CRP and not scanning patients with a resulting value of 10 or less would prevent unnecessary CT scans in 18.5% of patients.

Data source: Retrospective review of electronic medical records on 613 adults with Crohn’s disease who had 1,095 visits with CT scans at the University of Michigan from 2000 through 2011.

Disclosures: The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Working Group, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and UCB supported the research. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

MicroRNA test improved preop pancreatic cancer diagnosis

Testing will gradually improve FNA cytology
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
MicroRNA test improved preop pancreatic cancer diagnosis

Cytology and a microRNA-based test identified pancreatic cancer 91% of the time in specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration – a substantial improvement, compared with cytology alone, researchers reported in the October issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The microRNA-based test could help reduce repeated fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) due to indeterminate cytologies, said Dr. Randall Brand of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and his associates. Correctly assessing pancreatic cancer before surgery also could help patients start neoadjuvant therapy sooner if appropriate, they noted.

© goa_novi / ThinkStockPhotos.com
A new microRNA-based test can help significantly increase chances of detecting pancreatic cancer.

Several microRNAs are expressed abnormally in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The new test contains five of these sequences and is the first of its type for pancreatic cancer, the researchers said. To evaluate the assay, they assessed and compared relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction and cytology results from 95 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and 228 endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNAs. Specimens were collected during routine visits by patients with solid pancreatic masses, the investigators said (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014 October [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.038]).

The test used together with cytology correctly identified pancreatic cancer in 91% of positive specimens (95% confidence interval, 85.6%-94.5%), while cytology alone had a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI, 72.2%-84.5%), the researchers reported. Cytology and the microRNA test each had positive predictive values greater than 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%), they added.

When used alone, the microRNA test had a diagnostic sensitivity of more than 82% and a specificity of 96% – better than cytology on the same specimens, the investigators said. And the test correctly found pancreatic cancer in 22 of 39 specimens previously assessed as benign, indeterminate, or nondiagnostic by cytology, they said.

The researchers separately assessed 46 specimens collected percutaneously instead of by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and found much lower (58%) diagnostic sensitivity and a higher rate of technical failures, although specificity and predictive value still approached 90%, said the investigators. The percutaneous specimens all were collected from two study sites outside the United States, so further studies would need to validate whether a percutaneous approach could replace endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA, they said.

Cytology and microRNA testing also had to be performed on different FNA specimens, a limitation that "could have contributed to some of the observed discrepancies between cytology and molecular results," the investigators said.

Pancreatic cancer remains notoriously difficult to treat, with overall 5-year survival rates of only about 6%. MicroRNA sequences are stable and can reliably be recovered from both formalin-fixed and FNA specimens, making them a "particularly promising" class of biomarkers for pancreatic and other cancers, the researchers said. Based on the study results, future studies should explore the test’s prognostic potential, such as for distinguishing patients with resectable tumors that are likely to progress early or to guide choice of therapies, they said.

The study was supported by Asuragen and by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Dr. Brand and another author reported that they are on the clinical advisory board of Asuragen, and six of 27 coauthors reported being employees of the company. The rest reported no conflicts of interest.

References

Click for Credit Link
Body

The diagnosis of pancreas cancer is based on the results of clinical presentation, cross-sectional imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA).  A definitive tissue diagnosis is often required before chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Because of the greater sensitivity of EUS over CT scanning, EUS-guided FNA is often the procedure of choice.  EUS-guided FNA is highly dependent on the identification of malignant cells in the FNA specimens.  The presence of a dense peri-tumoral stroma containing fibroblasts often interferes with the aspiration and identification of malignant cells.
   
The cytological criteria for the diagnosis of pancreas adenocarcinoma with FNA requires the presence of a number of cellular features such as dark chromatin, large nuclei, and aggregates of atypical cells.  Not surprisingly, cytologists adhere rigidly to the criteria for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma resulting in a highly specific test with moderately high sensitivity.  The sensitivity of EUS FNA for the diagnosis of pancreas cancer remains stubbornly imperfect, between 85% and 95%.
   
Brand et al. have presented the results of a large multicenter 3-year validation trial designed to determine the performance characteristics of a 5-microRNA-based classifier for the diagnosis of pancreas cancer on 228 EUS-FNA specimens.  In the study, the false-negative rate for pancreas mass FNA was 20%. The results of the miRNA testing revealed a sensitivity of 83% and a false-negative rate of 17%.  However, when both the cytology and the miRNA test were used in conjunction, the sensitivity increased to 91% with a specificity of 96%.
 
The use of molecular markers in the management of FNA cytology specimens provides an opportunity to objectify the findings of aspirated tissue analysis.  With an objective test, the interpretation of specimens is not dependent upon the subjective findings of a cytologist.  It seems likely that this type of testing will gradually improve FNA cytology.  
 
Dr. William R. Brugge is director, Pancreas Biliary Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Cytology, microRNA, pancreatic cancer, endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, fine-needle, aspiration, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, FNAs, Randall Brand, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, neoadjuvant therapy,
Sections
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

The diagnosis of pancreas cancer is based on the results of clinical presentation, cross-sectional imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA).  A definitive tissue diagnosis is often required before chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Because of the greater sensitivity of EUS over CT scanning, EUS-guided FNA is often the procedure of choice.  EUS-guided FNA is highly dependent on the identification of malignant cells in the FNA specimens.  The presence of a dense peri-tumoral stroma containing fibroblasts often interferes with the aspiration and identification of malignant cells.
   
The cytological criteria for the diagnosis of pancreas adenocarcinoma with FNA requires the presence of a number of cellular features such as dark chromatin, large nuclei, and aggregates of atypical cells.  Not surprisingly, cytologists adhere rigidly to the criteria for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma resulting in a highly specific test with moderately high sensitivity.  The sensitivity of EUS FNA for the diagnosis of pancreas cancer remains stubbornly imperfect, between 85% and 95%.
   
Brand et al. have presented the results of a large multicenter 3-year validation trial designed to determine the performance characteristics of a 5-microRNA-based classifier for the diagnosis of pancreas cancer on 228 EUS-FNA specimens.  In the study, the false-negative rate for pancreas mass FNA was 20%. The results of the miRNA testing revealed a sensitivity of 83% and a false-negative rate of 17%.  However, when both the cytology and the miRNA test were used in conjunction, the sensitivity increased to 91% with a specificity of 96%.
 
The use of molecular markers in the management of FNA cytology specimens provides an opportunity to objectify the findings of aspirated tissue analysis.  With an objective test, the interpretation of specimens is not dependent upon the subjective findings of a cytologist.  It seems likely that this type of testing will gradually improve FNA cytology.  
 
Dr. William R. Brugge is director, Pancreas Biliary Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Body

The diagnosis of pancreas cancer is based on the results of clinical presentation, cross-sectional imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA).  A definitive tissue diagnosis is often required before chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Because of the greater sensitivity of EUS over CT scanning, EUS-guided FNA is often the procedure of choice.  EUS-guided FNA is highly dependent on the identification of malignant cells in the FNA specimens.  The presence of a dense peri-tumoral stroma containing fibroblasts often interferes with the aspiration and identification of malignant cells.
   
The cytological criteria for the diagnosis of pancreas adenocarcinoma with FNA requires the presence of a number of cellular features such as dark chromatin, large nuclei, and aggregates of atypical cells.  Not surprisingly, cytologists adhere rigidly to the criteria for the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma resulting in a highly specific test with moderately high sensitivity.  The sensitivity of EUS FNA for the diagnosis of pancreas cancer remains stubbornly imperfect, between 85% and 95%.
   
Brand et al. have presented the results of a large multicenter 3-year validation trial designed to determine the performance characteristics of a 5-microRNA-based classifier for the diagnosis of pancreas cancer on 228 EUS-FNA specimens.  In the study, the false-negative rate for pancreas mass FNA was 20%. The results of the miRNA testing revealed a sensitivity of 83% and a false-negative rate of 17%.  However, when both the cytology and the miRNA test were used in conjunction, the sensitivity increased to 91% with a specificity of 96%.
 
The use of molecular markers in the management of FNA cytology specimens provides an opportunity to objectify the findings of aspirated tissue analysis.  With an objective test, the interpretation of specimens is not dependent upon the subjective findings of a cytologist.  It seems likely that this type of testing will gradually improve FNA cytology.  
 
Dr. William R. Brugge is director, Pancreas Biliary Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Title
Testing will gradually improve FNA cytology
Testing will gradually improve FNA cytology

Cytology and a microRNA-based test identified pancreatic cancer 91% of the time in specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration – a substantial improvement, compared with cytology alone, researchers reported in the October issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The microRNA-based test could help reduce repeated fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) due to indeterminate cytologies, said Dr. Randall Brand of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and his associates. Correctly assessing pancreatic cancer before surgery also could help patients start neoadjuvant therapy sooner if appropriate, they noted.

© goa_novi / ThinkStockPhotos.com
A new microRNA-based test can help significantly increase chances of detecting pancreatic cancer.

Several microRNAs are expressed abnormally in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The new test contains five of these sequences and is the first of its type for pancreatic cancer, the researchers said. To evaluate the assay, they assessed and compared relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction and cytology results from 95 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and 228 endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNAs. Specimens were collected during routine visits by patients with solid pancreatic masses, the investigators said (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014 October [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.038]).

The test used together with cytology correctly identified pancreatic cancer in 91% of positive specimens (95% confidence interval, 85.6%-94.5%), while cytology alone had a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI, 72.2%-84.5%), the researchers reported. Cytology and the microRNA test each had positive predictive values greater than 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%), they added.

When used alone, the microRNA test had a diagnostic sensitivity of more than 82% and a specificity of 96% – better than cytology on the same specimens, the investigators said. And the test correctly found pancreatic cancer in 22 of 39 specimens previously assessed as benign, indeterminate, or nondiagnostic by cytology, they said.

The researchers separately assessed 46 specimens collected percutaneously instead of by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and found much lower (58%) diagnostic sensitivity and a higher rate of technical failures, although specificity and predictive value still approached 90%, said the investigators. The percutaneous specimens all were collected from two study sites outside the United States, so further studies would need to validate whether a percutaneous approach could replace endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA, they said.

Cytology and microRNA testing also had to be performed on different FNA specimens, a limitation that "could have contributed to some of the observed discrepancies between cytology and molecular results," the investigators said.

Pancreatic cancer remains notoriously difficult to treat, with overall 5-year survival rates of only about 6%. MicroRNA sequences are stable and can reliably be recovered from both formalin-fixed and FNA specimens, making them a "particularly promising" class of biomarkers for pancreatic and other cancers, the researchers said. Based on the study results, future studies should explore the test’s prognostic potential, such as for distinguishing patients with resectable tumors that are likely to progress early or to guide choice of therapies, they said.

The study was supported by Asuragen and by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Dr. Brand and another author reported that they are on the clinical advisory board of Asuragen, and six of 27 coauthors reported being employees of the company. The rest reported no conflicts of interest.

Cytology and a microRNA-based test identified pancreatic cancer 91% of the time in specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration – a substantial improvement, compared with cytology alone, researchers reported in the October issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.

The microRNA-based test could help reduce repeated fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) due to indeterminate cytologies, said Dr. Randall Brand of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and his associates. Correctly assessing pancreatic cancer before surgery also could help patients start neoadjuvant therapy sooner if appropriate, they noted.

© goa_novi / ThinkStockPhotos.com
A new microRNA-based test can help significantly increase chances of detecting pancreatic cancer.

Several microRNAs are expressed abnormally in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The new test contains five of these sequences and is the first of its type for pancreatic cancer, the researchers said. To evaluate the assay, they assessed and compared relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction and cytology results from 95 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens and 228 endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNAs. Specimens were collected during routine visits by patients with solid pancreatic masses, the investigators said (Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014 October [doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.038]).

The test used together with cytology correctly identified pancreatic cancer in 91% of positive specimens (95% confidence interval, 85.6%-94.5%), while cytology alone had a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI, 72.2%-84.5%), the researchers reported. Cytology and the microRNA test each had positive predictive values greater than 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%), they added.

When used alone, the microRNA test had a diagnostic sensitivity of more than 82% and a specificity of 96% – better than cytology on the same specimens, the investigators said. And the test correctly found pancreatic cancer in 22 of 39 specimens previously assessed as benign, indeterminate, or nondiagnostic by cytology, they said.

The researchers separately assessed 46 specimens collected percutaneously instead of by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and found much lower (58%) diagnostic sensitivity and a higher rate of technical failures, although specificity and predictive value still approached 90%, said the investigators. The percutaneous specimens all were collected from two study sites outside the United States, so further studies would need to validate whether a percutaneous approach could replace endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA, they said.

Cytology and microRNA testing also had to be performed on different FNA specimens, a limitation that "could have contributed to some of the observed discrepancies between cytology and molecular results," the investigators said.

Pancreatic cancer remains notoriously difficult to treat, with overall 5-year survival rates of only about 6%. MicroRNA sequences are stable and can reliably be recovered from both formalin-fixed and FNA specimens, making them a "particularly promising" class of biomarkers for pancreatic and other cancers, the researchers said. Based on the study results, future studies should explore the test’s prognostic potential, such as for distinguishing patients with resectable tumors that are likely to progress early or to guide choice of therapies, they said.

The study was supported by Asuragen and by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Dr. Brand and another author reported that they are on the clinical advisory board of Asuragen, and six of 27 coauthors reported being employees of the company. The rest reported no conflicts of interest.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
MicroRNA test improved preop pancreatic cancer diagnosis
Display Headline
MicroRNA test improved preop pancreatic cancer diagnosis
Legacy Keywords
Cytology, microRNA, pancreatic cancer, endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, fine-needle, aspiration, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, FNAs, Randall Brand, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, neoadjuvant therapy,
Legacy Keywords
Cytology, microRNA, pancreatic cancer, endoscopic, ultrasound-guided, fine-needle, aspiration, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, FNAs, Randall Brand, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, neoadjuvant therapy,
Sections
Article Source

FROM CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Cytology and a microRNA-based test were more sensitive than cytology alone in evaluating pancreatic cancer specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Major finding: Using the microRNA test combined with cytology correctly identified pancreatic cancer almost 91% of the time (95% CI, 85.6%-94.5%), while cytology alone had a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI, 72.2%-84.5%).

Data source: Prospective, multicenter study of relative quantitative polymerase chain reaction and cytology results from 95 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples and 228 specimens collected by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirate.

Disclosures: The study was supported by Asuragen and by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Dr. Brand and another author reported that they are on the clinical advisory board for Asuragen, and six of 27 coauthors reported being employees of the company. The rest reported no conflicts of interest.

Drug combinations found to increase upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk

'Real world' results
Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Drug combinations found to increase upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk

Combining nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding by up to 190% beyond the baseline risk found for NSAID monotherapy, researchers reported in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Patients also faced excess risks of upper GI bleeding when they took corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants together with low-dose aspirin or nonselective NSAIDs, although the effect was not seen for COX-2 inhibitors, said Dr. Gwen Masclee at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands and her associates.

© khuntapol / ThinkStockPhotos.com
A new study advises clinicians to avoid certain drug combinations to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings should help clinicians tailor treatments to minimize chances of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for elderly patients who often take multiple drugs, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 [doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.007]).

The researchers analyzed 114,835 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, including all gastroduodenal ulcers and hemorrhages extracted from seven electronic health record databases from the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark. Three databases included primary care data, and four were administrative claims data, the investigators said. Cases served as their own controls, they noted.

Monotherapy with prescription nonselective NSAIDs increased the chances of an upper gastrointestinal bleed by 4.3 times, compared with not using any of the drugs studied (95% confidence interval, 4.1-4.4), the researchers said. Notably, bleeding risk from taking either nonselective NSAIDs or corticosteroids was the same, they said, adding that previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings on the topic. The incidence ratios for monotherapy with low-dose aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors were slightly lower at 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7-3.2), respectively, they added.

 

 

Combining nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs led to excess risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding of 1.6 (95% CI, 0.5-2.6), 1.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.4), and 0.49 (–0.05-1.03), respectively, the researchers reported. "From a biological point of view, this interaction seems plausible because SSRIs decrease the serotonin level, resulting in impaired thrombocyte aggregation and an increased risk of bleeding in general," they said.

Corticosteroids combined with nonselective NSAIDs led to the greatest increases in bleeding risk, with an incidence ratio of 12.8 (95% CI, 11.1-14.7), compared with nonuse of any drug studied, and an excess risk of 5.5 (3.7-7.3), compared with NSAID use alone, said the researchers. Adding aldosterone antagonists to nonselective NSAIDs led to an excess risk of 4.46, compared with using nonselective NSAIDs alone, they reported (95% CI, 1.79-7.13).

Because the study did not capture over-the-counter NSAID prescriptions, it could have underestimated use of these drugs, the investigators said. Also, changes in health or NSAID use during the study could have created residual confounding, although sensitivity analyses did not reveal problems, they reported. They added that misclassification of some data could have led them to underestimate risks. "Finally, we did not take any carryover effect or dose of drug exposure into account, which potentially limits the generalizability concerning causality of the associations," they concluded.

Five authors reported employment or other financial support from Erasmus University Medical Center, AstraZeneca, Janssen, PHARMO Institute, and the European Medicines Agency. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interests.

References

Click for Credit Link
Body

Gastrointestinal toxicity is the major issue limiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use. The excess annual risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 1,000 patients is about 1 with low-dose aspirin, about 2 with coxibs, and about 4-6 with traditional NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen). However, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding increases markedly with several factors, including the use of concomitant medications.

Ideally, large randomized trials comparing NSAIDs with and without a concomitant medication would inform our assessment of risk. However, few such trials are available, so we commonly rely on observational database studies, such as that of Masclee et al. These studies have the important benefit of large sample size and "real world" results, but also have potential limitations, including reliability of data (for example, accuracy of diagnostic coding) and potential bias because of unequal distribution of confounding factors between cases and controls.

Masclee et al. report significant synergy (more than additive risk) of traditional NSAIDs with corticosteroids, SSRIs, aldosterone antagonists, and antithrombotic agents other than low-dose aspirin (although risk was increased with traditional NSAIDs plus low-dose aspirin). Low-dose aspirin was synergistic with antithrombotic agents and corticosteroids, while coxibs were synergistic with low-dose aspirin and SSRIs.

The results of Masclee et al. support current North American guidelines, which suggest use of proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol for traditional NSAID users taking concomitant medications such as antithrombotics, corticosteroids, or SSRIs, and use of PPIs for low-dose-aspirin users taking antithrombotics or taking corticosteroids if greater than or equal to 60 years old. Their results also suggest further evaluation of aldosterone antagonists is warranted as another possible risk factor.

Dr. Loren Laine is professor of medicine, department of internal medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. He is on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards of Eisai, BMS, and Bayer; and is a consultant for AstraZeneca.

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory, drugs, serotonin, reuptake inhibitors, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, NSAID monotherapy, Gastroenterology, corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, anticoagulants, Gwen Masclee, Erasmus Medical Center,
Sections
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Body

Gastrointestinal toxicity is the major issue limiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use. The excess annual risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 1,000 patients is about 1 with low-dose aspirin, about 2 with coxibs, and about 4-6 with traditional NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen). However, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding increases markedly with several factors, including the use of concomitant medications.

Ideally, large randomized trials comparing NSAIDs with and without a concomitant medication would inform our assessment of risk. However, few such trials are available, so we commonly rely on observational database studies, such as that of Masclee et al. These studies have the important benefit of large sample size and "real world" results, but also have potential limitations, including reliability of data (for example, accuracy of diagnostic coding) and potential bias because of unequal distribution of confounding factors between cases and controls.

Masclee et al. report significant synergy (more than additive risk) of traditional NSAIDs with corticosteroids, SSRIs, aldosterone antagonists, and antithrombotic agents other than low-dose aspirin (although risk was increased with traditional NSAIDs plus low-dose aspirin). Low-dose aspirin was synergistic with antithrombotic agents and corticosteroids, while coxibs were synergistic with low-dose aspirin and SSRIs.

The results of Masclee et al. support current North American guidelines, which suggest use of proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol for traditional NSAID users taking concomitant medications such as antithrombotics, corticosteroids, or SSRIs, and use of PPIs for low-dose-aspirin users taking antithrombotics or taking corticosteroids if greater than or equal to 60 years old. Their results also suggest further evaluation of aldosterone antagonists is warranted as another possible risk factor.

Dr. Loren Laine is professor of medicine, department of internal medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. He is on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards of Eisai, BMS, and Bayer; and is a consultant for AstraZeneca.

Body

Gastrointestinal toxicity is the major issue limiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory use. The excess annual risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding per 1,000 patients is about 1 with low-dose aspirin, about 2 with coxibs, and about 4-6 with traditional NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen). However, the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding increases markedly with several factors, including the use of concomitant medications.

Ideally, large randomized trials comparing NSAIDs with and without a concomitant medication would inform our assessment of risk. However, few such trials are available, so we commonly rely on observational database studies, such as that of Masclee et al. These studies have the important benefit of large sample size and "real world" results, but also have potential limitations, including reliability of data (for example, accuracy of diagnostic coding) and potential bias because of unequal distribution of confounding factors between cases and controls.

Masclee et al. report significant synergy (more than additive risk) of traditional NSAIDs with corticosteroids, SSRIs, aldosterone antagonists, and antithrombotic agents other than low-dose aspirin (although risk was increased with traditional NSAIDs plus low-dose aspirin). Low-dose aspirin was synergistic with antithrombotic agents and corticosteroids, while coxibs were synergistic with low-dose aspirin and SSRIs.

The results of Masclee et al. support current North American guidelines, which suggest use of proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol for traditional NSAID users taking concomitant medications such as antithrombotics, corticosteroids, or SSRIs, and use of PPIs for low-dose-aspirin users taking antithrombotics or taking corticosteroids if greater than or equal to 60 years old. Their results also suggest further evaluation of aldosterone antagonists is warranted as another possible risk factor.

Dr. Loren Laine is professor of medicine, department of internal medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. He is on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards of Eisai, BMS, and Bayer; and is a consultant for AstraZeneca.

Title
'Real world' results
'Real world' results

Combining nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding by up to 190% beyond the baseline risk found for NSAID monotherapy, researchers reported in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Patients also faced excess risks of upper GI bleeding when they took corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants together with low-dose aspirin or nonselective NSAIDs, although the effect was not seen for COX-2 inhibitors, said Dr. Gwen Masclee at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands and her associates.

© khuntapol / ThinkStockPhotos.com
A new study advises clinicians to avoid certain drug combinations to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings should help clinicians tailor treatments to minimize chances of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for elderly patients who often take multiple drugs, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 [doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.007]).

The researchers analyzed 114,835 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, including all gastroduodenal ulcers and hemorrhages extracted from seven electronic health record databases from the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark. Three databases included primary care data, and four were administrative claims data, the investigators said. Cases served as their own controls, they noted.

Monotherapy with prescription nonselective NSAIDs increased the chances of an upper gastrointestinal bleed by 4.3 times, compared with not using any of the drugs studied (95% confidence interval, 4.1-4.4), the researchers said. Notably, bleeding risk from taking either nonselective NSAIDs or corticosteroids was the same, they said, adding that previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings on the topic. The incidence ratios for monotherapy with low-dose aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors were slightly lower at 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7-3.2), respectively, they added.

 

 

Combining nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs led to excess risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding of 1.6 (95% CI, 0.5-2.6), 1.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.4), and 0.49 (–0.05-1.03), respectively, the researchers reported. "From a biological point of view, this interaction seems plausible because SSRIs decrease the serotonin level, resulting in impaired thrombocyte aggregation and an increased risk of bleeding in general," they said.

Corticosteroids combined with nonselective NSAIDs led to the greatest increases in bleeding risk, with an incidence ratio of 12.8 (95% CI, 11.1-14.7), compared with nonuse of any drug studied, and an excess risk of 5.5 (3.7-7.3), compared with NSAID use alone, said the researchers. Adding aldosterone antagonists to nonselective NSAIDs led to an excess risk of 4.46, compared with using nonselective NSAIDs alone, they reported (95% CI, 1.79-7.13).

Because the study did not capture over-the-counter NSAID prescriptions, it could have underestimated use of these drugs, the investigators said. Also, changes in health or NSAID use during the study could have created residual confounding, although sensitivity analyses did not reveal problems, they reported. They added that misclassification of some data could have led them to underestimate risks. "Finally, we did not take any carryover effect or dose of drug exposure into account, which potentially limits the generalizability concerning causality of the associations," they concluded.

Five authors reported employment or other financial support from Erasmus University Medical Center, AstraZeneca, Janssen, PHARMO Institute, and the European Medicines Agency. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interests.

Combining nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors increased the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding by up to 190% beyond the baseline risk found for NSAID monotherapy, researchers reported in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Patients also faced excess risks of upper GI bleeding when they took corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants together with low-dose aspirin or nonselective NSAIDs, although the effect was not seen for COX-2 inhibitors, said Dr. Gwen Masclee at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands and her associates.

© khuntapol / ThinkStockPhotos.com
A new study advises clinicians to avoid certain drug combinations to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings should help clinicians tailor treatments to minimize chances of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly for elderly patients who often take multiple drugs, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 [doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.007]).

The researchers analyzed 114,835 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, including all gastroduodenal ulcers and hemorrhages extracted from seven electronic health record databases from the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark. Three databases included primary care data, and four were administrative claims data, the investigators said. Cases served as their own controls, they noted.

Monotherapy with prescription nonselective NSAIDs increased the chances of an upper gastrointestinal bleed by 4.3 times, compared with not using any of the drugs studied (95% confidence interval, 4.1-4.4), the researchers said. Notably, bleeding risk from taking either nonselective NSAIDs or corticosteroids was the same, they said, adding that previous studies have yielded inconsistent findings on the topic. The incidence ratios for monotherapy with low-dose aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors were slightly lower at 3.1 (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) and 2.9 (95% CI, 2.7-3.2), respectively, they added.

 

 

Combining nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin with SSRIs led to excess risks of upper gastrointestinal bleeding of 1.6 (95% CI, 0.5-2.6), 1.9 (95% CI, 0.2-3.4), and 0.49 (–0.05-1.03), respectively, the researchers reported. "From a biological point of view, this interaction seems plausible because SSRIs decrease the serotonin level, resulting in impaired thrombocyte aggregation and an increased risk of bleeding in general," they said.

Corticosteroids combined with nonselective NSAIDs led to the greatest increases in bleeding risk, with an incidence ratio of 12.8 (95% CI, 11.1-14.7), compared with nonuse of any drug studied, and an excess risk of 5.5 (3.7-7.3), compared with NSAID use alone, said the researchers. Adding aldosterone antagonists to nonselective NSAIDs led to an excess risk of 4.46, compared with using nonselective NSAIDs alone, they reported (95% CI, 1.79-7.13).

Because the study did not capture over-the-counter NSAID prescriptions, it could have underestimated use of these drugs, the investigators said. Also, changes in health or NSAID use during the study could have created residual confounding, although sensitivity analyses did not reveal problems, they reported. They added that misclassification of some data could have led them to underestimate risks. "Finally, we did not take any carryover effect or dose of drug exposure into account, which potentially limits the generalizability concerning causality of the associations," they concluded.

Five authors reported employment or other financial support from Erasmus University Medical Center, AstraZeneca, Janssen, PHARMO Institute, and the European Medicines Agency. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interests.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Drug combinations found to increase upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk
Display Headline
Drug combinations found to increase upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk
Legacy Keywords
nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory, drugs, serotonin, reuptake inhibitors, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, NSAID monotherapy, Gastroenterology, corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, anticoagulants, Gwen Masclee, Erasmus Medical Center,
Legacy Keywords
nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory, drugs, serotonin, reuptake inhibitors, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, NSAID monotherapy, Gastroenterology, corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, anticoagulants, Gwen Masclee, Erasmus Medical Center,
Sections
Article Source

FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Excess risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred with combinations of NSAIDs and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and with combinations of nonselective NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin with corticosteroids, aldosterone antagonists, or anticoagulants.

Major finding: Excess risks from combining SSRIs with nonselective NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or low-dose aspirin were 1.62 (95% CI, 0.58-2.66), 1.86 (95% CI, 0.28- 3.44), and 0.49 (95% CI, –0.05-1.03), respectively.

Data source: Case series analysis of 114,835 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients were identified from seven electronic health record databases from the Netherlands, Italy, and Denmark, and cases served as their own controls.

Disclosures: Five authors reported employment or other financial support from Erasmus University Medical Center, AstraZeneca, Janssen, PHARMO Institute, and the European Medicines Agency. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interests.

Pediatric IBD rose by more than 40% in 15 years

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Pediatric IBD rose by more than 40% in 15 years

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease grew by more than 40% in a 15-year period in Ontario, Canada, according to a retrospective cohort study published in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Although rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) rose in children and adolescents of all ages, the steepest increase occurred in children with very-early-onset IBD (VEO-IBD), defined as disease diagnosed before they were 10 years old, said Dr. Eric Benchimol at the University of Ottawa and his associates. But these patients also tended to use fewer health services and have fewer surgeries for IBD, compared with older children with the disease, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 October [doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.023]).

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings add to research indicating that VEO-IBD is a distinct form of IBD and indicate the need to assess subgroups of these patients to look at phenotype, genotype, intestinal microbiome, and treatment response, the investigators said.

For the study, researchers created a cohort based on an algorithm of health care visits that identified all children and adolescents in Ontario diagnosed with IBD before age 18 years. The analysis included 7,143 patients with IBD, among whom about 14% had VEO-IBD, the investigators reported.

The overall rate of IBD in children up to 18 years old increased from 9.4 to 13.2 cases per 100,000 population from 1994 through 2009 (P less than .0001), the researchers said. And the yearly increase in VEO-IBD averaged 7.4% – more than three times greater than the 2.2% average annual rise among children diagnosed at 10 years and older, the investigators reported.

But health care utilization trends did not mirror changes in incidence, Dr. Benchimol and associates reported. For example, children diagnosed before they were 6 years old had significantly fewer outpatient visits for IBD, compared with children diagnosed at 10 years and older (odds ratio for girls, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.78; OR for boys, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98). Furthermore, patients diagnosed before age 6 years were less likely to be hospitalized for IBD than were older children with the disease (hazard ratio for girls, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87; HR for boys, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94-1.33), the investigators said.

The likelihood of undergoing intestinal resection also was lower for children diagnosed before age 6 years with Crohn’s disease, compared with older girls (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.78) and boys (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34-0.99), said the researchers. And patients diagnosed before age 6 years with ulcerative colitis were less likely to undergo colectomy than were older girls (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.47-1.63) and boys (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.85). In contrast, rates of IBD-related surgery and hospitalization were similar between children diagnosed at 6-9.9 years of age and those diagnosed at age 10 up to 18 years, the investigators said.

A cohort study from the United States also found a lower likelihood of surgery in children with VEO-IBD, the researchers noted. Large-bowel involvement without ileal disease is prominent in young children with IBD, and these patients might be unlikely to undergo resection because colectomy requires a permanent ostotomy, they added.

The work was supported by the American College of Gastroenterology, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada, the National Institutes of Health, the Wolpow Family Chair in IBD Treatment and Research, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, Ontario, Canada, Gastroenterology, IBD, VEO-IBD, Dr. Eric Benchimol, University of Ottawa, Gastroenterology, phenotype, genotype, intestinal microbiome, treatment response,
Sections
Click for Credit Link
Click for Credit Link
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease grew by more than 40% in a 15-year period in Ontario, Canada, according to a retrospective cohort study published in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Although rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) rose in children and adolescents of all ages, the steepest increase occurred in children with very-early-onset IBD (VEO-IBD), defined as disease diagnosed before they were 10 years old, said Dr. Eric Benchimol at the University of Ottawa and his associates. But these patients also tended to use fewer health services and have fewer surgeries for IBD, compared with older children with the disease, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 October [doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.023]).

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings add to research indicating that VEO-IBD is a distinct form of IBD and indicate the need to assess subgroups of these patients to look at phenotype, genotype, intestinal microbiome, and treatment response, the investigators said.

For the study, researchers created a cohort based on an algorithm of health care visits that identified all children and adolescents in Ontario diagnosed with IBD before age 18 years. The analysis included 7,143 patients with IBD, among whom about 14% had VEO-IBD, the investigators reported.

The overall rate of IBD in children up to 18 years old increased from 9.4 to 13.2 cases per 100,000 population from 1994 through 2009 (P less than .0001), the researchers said. And the yearly increase in VEO-IBD averaged 7.4% – more than three times greater than the 2.2% average annual rise among children diagnosed at 10 years and older, the investigators reported.

But health care utilization trends did not mirror changes in incidence, Dr. Benchimol and associates reported. For example, children diagnosed before they were 6 years old had significantly fewer outpatient visits for IBD, compared with children diagnosed at 10 years and older (odds ratio for girls, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.78; OR for boys, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98). Furthermore, patients diagnosed before age 6 years were less likely to be hospitalized for IBD than were older children with the disease (hazard ratio for girls, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87; HR for boys, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94-1.33), the investigators said.

The likelihood of undergoing intestinal resection also was lower for children diagnosed before age 6 years with Crohn’s disease, compared with older girls (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.78) and boys (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34-0.99), said the researchers. And patients diagnosed before age 6 years with ulcerative colitis were less likely to undergo colectomy than were older girls (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.47-1.63) and boys (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.85). In contrast, rates of IBD-related surgery and hospitalization were similar between children diagnosed at 6-9.9 years of age and those diagnosed at age 10 up to 18 years, the investigators said.

A cohort study from the United States also found a lower likelihood of surgery in children with VEO-IBD, the researchers noted. Large-bowel involvement without ileal disease is prominent in young children with IBD, and these patients might be unlikely to undergo resection because colectomy requires a permanent ostotomy, they added.

The work was supported by the American College of Gastroenterology, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada, the National Institutes of Health, the Wolpow Family Chair in IBD Treatment and Research, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease grew by more than 40% in a 15-year period in Ontario, Canada, according to a retrospective cohort study published in the October issue of Gastroenterology.

Although rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) rose in children and adolescents of all ages, the steepest increase occurred in children with very-early-onset IBD (VEO-IBD), defined as disease diagnosed before they were 10 years old, said Dr. Eric Benchimol at the University of Ottawa and his associates. But these patients also tended to use fewer health services and have fewer surgeries for IBD, compared with older children with the disease, the investigators said (Gastroenterology 2014 October [doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.06.023]).

Source: American Gastroenterological Association

The findings add to research indicating that VEO-IBD is a distinct form of IBD and indicate the need to assess subgroups of these patients to look at phenotype, genotype, intestinal microbiome, and treatment response, the investigators said.

For the study, researchers created a cohort based on an algorithm of health care visits that identified all children and adolescents in Ontario diagnosed with IBD before age 18 years. The analysis included 7,143 patients with IBD, among whom about 14% had VEO-IBD, the investigators reported.

The overall rate of IBD in children up to 18 years old increased from 9.4 to 13.2 cases per 100,000 population from 1994 through 2009 (P less than .0001), the researchers said. And the yearly increase in VEO-IBD averaged 7.4% – more than three times greater than the 2.2% average annual rise among children diagnosed at 10 years and older, the investigators reported.

But health care utilization trends did not mirror changes in incidence, Dr. Benchimol and associates reported. For example, children diagnosed before they were 6 years old had significantly fewer outpatient visits for IBD, compared with children diagnosed at 10 years and older (odds ratio for girls, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.78; OR for boys, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98). Furthermore, patients diagnosed before age 6 years were less likely to be hospitalized for IBD than were older children with the disease (hazard ratio for girls, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87; HR for boys, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94-1.33), the investigators said.

The likelihood of undergoing intestinal resection also was lower for children diagnosed before age 6 years with Crohn’s disease, compared with older girls (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.78) and boys (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.34-0.99), said the researchers. And patients diagnosed before age 6 years with ulcerative colitis were less likely to undergo colectomy than were older girls (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.47-1.63) and boys (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.85). In contrast, rates of IBD-related surgery and hospitalization were similar between children diagnosed at 6-9.9 years of age and those diagnosed at age 10 up to 18 years, the investigators said.

A cohort study from the United States also found a lower likelihood of surgery in children with VEO-IBD, the researchers noted. Large-bowel involvement without ileal disease is prominent in young children with IBD, and these patients might be unlikely to undergo resection because colectomy requires a permanent ostotomy, they added.

The work was supported by the American College of Gastroenterology, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada, the National Institutes of Health, the Wolpow Family Chair in IBD Treatment and Research, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Pediatric IBD rose by more than 40% in 15 years
Display Headline
Pediatric IBD rose by more than 40% in 15 years
Legacy Keywords
Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, Ontario, Canada, Gastroenterology, IBD, VEO-IBD, Dr. Eric Benchimol, University of Ottawa, Gastroenterology, phenotype, genotype, intestinal microbiome, treatment response,
Legacy Keywords
Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, Ontario, Canada, Gastroenterology, IBD, VEO-IBD, Dr. Eric Benchimol, University of Ottawa, Gastroenterology, phenotype, genotype, intestinal microbiome, treatment response,
Sections
Article Source

FROM GASTROENTEROLOGY

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Although the steepest rise in inflammatory bowel disease occurred in children diagnosed before age 10 years, children diagnosed before age 6 years had the lowest rates of IBD-related outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and surgeries.

Major finding: Rates of pediatric IBD increased by more than 40% between 1994 and 2009 in Ontario, Canada. Rates rose by an average of 7.4% annually in children diagnosed before age 10 years, compared with 2.2% for children diagnosed from 10 years to before 18 years of age. Rates of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and IBD-related surgeries were significantly lower in children diagnosed before age 6 years, compared with children diagnosed at 10 years or older.

Data Source: Retrospective study of the Ontario Crohn’s and Colitis Cohort, which included 7,143 children and adolescents with IBD diagnosed between 1994 and 2009 in Ontario, Canada.

Disclosures: The work was supported by grants and researcher awards from the American College of Gastroenterology, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada, the National Institutes of Health, the Wolpow Family Chair in IBD Treatment and Research, the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

Simvastatin shows no benefit for ARDS

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Simvastatin shows no benefit for ARDS

Simvastatin did not improve clinical outcomes in adults with respiratory distress syndrome, compared with placebo, according to investigators.

The report was published online Sept. 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Despite positive findings in early-phase studies, large clinical trials have failed to show that statins benefit patients with ARDS, said Dr. Daniel McAuley of Queen’s University of Belfast, Ireland, and his associates. The earlier studies used surrogate measures that do not clearly correlate with patient-specific outcomes, the researchers said. “Surrogate outcomes that more closely track patient outcomes need to be identified,” they added (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Sept. 30 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403285]).

The multicenter, double-blind trial comprised 540 adults with ARDS from 40 intensive care units in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Patients were randomized to enteral simvastatin or placebo, and the groups did not differ significantly in terms of number of ventilator-free days (12.6 vs. 11.5 days, respectively), days free of nonpulmonary organ failure (19.4 vs. 17.8 days), or 28-day mortality (22% vs. 26.8%), the investigators reported. Adverse effects also were similar between the groups, they said.

The researchers recruited a heterogeneous cohort of patients with ARDS resulting from any cause so that findings would be generalizable, they wrote. Because recent research suggests that identification of specific phenotypes within ARDS may be possible, future studies “may identify a subpopulation of patients with ARDS who might have a greater response to simvastatin than was observed in our study,” they noted.

The study was funded by the U.K. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a joint partnership of the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. McAuley reported financial ties to GlaxoSmithKline as well as a patent pending application related to a novel treatment for ARDS.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
simvastatin, critical care, ARDS, respiratory distress
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Simvastatin did not improve clinical outcomes in adults with respiratory distress syndrome, compared with placebo, according to investigators.

The report was published online Sept. 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Despite positive findings in early-phase studies, large clinical trials have failed to show that statins benefit patients with ARDS, said Dr. Daniel McAuley of Queen’s University of Belfast, Ireland, and his associates. The earlier studies used surrogate measures that do not clearly correlate with patient-specific outcomes, the researchers said. “Surrogate outcomes that more closely track patient outcomes need to be identified,” they added (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Sept. 30 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403285]).

The multicenter, double-blind trial comprised 540 adults with ARDS from 40 intensive care units in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Patients were randomized to enteral simvastatin or placebo, and the groups did not differ significantly in terms of number of ventilator-free days (12.6 vs. 11.5 days, respectively), days free of nonpulmonary organ failure (19.4 vs. 17.8 days), or 28-day mortality (22% vs. 26.8%), the investigators reported. Adverse effects also were similar between the groups, they said.

The researchers recruited a heterogeneous cohort of patients with ARDS resulting from any cause so that findings would be generalizable, they wrote. Because recent research suggests that identification of specific phenotypes within ARDS may be possible, future studies “may identify a subpopulation of patients with ARDS who might have a greater response to simvastatin than was observed in our study,” they noted.

The study was funded by the U.K. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a joint partnership of the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. McAuley reported financial ties to GlaxoSmithKline as well as a patent pending application related to a novel treatment for ARDS.

Simvastatin did not improve clinical outcomes in adults with respiratory distress syndrome, compared with placebo, according to investigators.

The report was published online Sept. 30 in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Despite positive findings in early-phase studies, large clinical trials have failed to show that statins benefit patients with ARDS, said Dr. Daniel McAuley of Queen’s University of Belfast, Ireland, and his associates. The earlier studies used surrogate measures that do not clearly correlate with patient-specific outcomes, the researchers said. “Surrogate outcomes that more closely track patient outcomes need to be identified,” they added (N. Engl. J. Med. 2014 Sept. 30 [doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403285]).

The multicenter, double-blind trial comprised 540 adults with ARDS from 40 intensive care units in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Patients were randomized to enteral simvastatin or placebo, and the groups did not differ significantly in terms of number of ventilator-free days (12.6 vs. 11.5 days, respectively), days free of nonpulmonary organ failure (19.4 vs. 17.8 days), or 28-day mortality (22% vs. 26.8%), the investigators reported. Adverse effects also were similar between the groups, they said.

The researchers recruited a heterogeneous cohort of patients with ARDS resulting from any cause so that findings would be generalizable, they wrote. Because recent research suggests that identification of specific phenotypes within ARDS may be possible, future studies “may identify a subpopulation of patients with ARDS who might have a greater response to simvastatin than was observed in our study,” they noted.

The study was funded by the U.K. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a joint partnership of the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. McAuley reported financial ties to GlaxoSmithKline as well as a patent pending application related to a novel treatment for ARDS.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Simvastatin shows no benefit for ARDS
Display Headline
Simvastatin shows no benefit for ARDS
Legacy Keywords
simvastatin, critical care, ARDS, respiratory distress
Legacy Keywords
simvastatin, critical care, ARDS, respiratory distress
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Simvastatin did not improve clinical outcomes in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Major finding: The simvastatin and placebo groups did not significantly differ in terms of number of ventilator-free days (12.6 vs. 11.5 days, respectively), days free of nonpulmonary organ failure (19.4 vs. 17.8 days), or 28-day mortality (22% vs. 26.8%).

Data source: Multicenter double-blind randomized trial of enteral simvastatin or placebo in 540 adults with ARDS.

Disclosures: The study was funded by the U.K. Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, a joint parternship of the Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research. Dr. McAuley reported financial ties to GlaxoSmithKline as well as a patent pending application related to a novel treatment for ARDS.

High-dose treatment did not benefit ICU patients with vitamin D deficiency

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
High-dose treatment did not benefit ICU patients with vitamin D deficiency

High-dose vitamin D did not improve outcomes in critically ill, vitamin D­–deficient patients, compared with placebo, researchers reported in JAMA and at the annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

©Joss/Fotolia.com
Vitamin D3 treatment did not reduce hospital length of stay or mortality in critically ill, vitamin D-deficient patients.

Although the study was adequately powered, length of stay did not differ between the vitamin D and placebo groups, said Dr. Karin Amrein of the Medical University of Graz, Austria, and her associates. “In the overall cohort, hospital and 6-month mortality rates were numerically lower in the vitamin D3 group, but these differences were not significant,” the researchers said.

A subgroup of patients with severe vitamin D deficiency did have significantly lower hospital mortality when treated with vitamin D, compared with placebo, but the effect “should be considered hypothesis generating and requires further study,” the investigators concluded (JAMA 2014 Sept. 29 [doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13204]).

The randomized, double-blind, single-center trial enrolled 492 critically ill medical and surgical patients with serum vitamin D levels of 20 ng/mL or less. Patients received placebo or vitamin D3 at a loading dose of 540,000 IU, followed by a monthly maintenance dose of 90,000 IU for 5 months, the researchers said.

Length of hospital stay averaged 20.1 days for patients who received vitamin D and 19.3 days for the placebo group, the investigators reported.

Dr. Karin Amrein

Among patients who received vitamin D3, 28.3% died in the hospital, compared with 35.3% of the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.11), they said. Six-month mortality was 35.0% for the vitamin D3 group, compared with 42.9% for the placebo group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04), they said.

Among 200 patients with severe vitamin D deficiencies of 12 ng/mL or less, vitamin D3 treatment was linked to a 44% drop in risk of dying in the hospital, the researchers said (28.6% vs. 46.1% for placebo; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.90; P = .04).But length of hospital stay and 6-month mortality rates were similar between the two groups, they reported.

Drug maker Fresenius Kabi provided study medication and a grant to support the research. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and the Austrian National Bank also funded the study.

Dr Amrein reported and one coauthor reported receiving lecture fees from Fresenius Kabi. The authors reported no other relevant financial conflicts of interest.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
Vitamin D, supplements, critical care, ICU
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

High-dose vitamin D did not improve outcomes in critically ill, vitamin D­–deficient patients, compared with placebo, researchers reported in JAMA and at the annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

©Joss/Fotolia.com
Vitamin D3 treatment did not reduce hospital length of stay or mortality in critically ill, vitamin D-deficient patients.

Although the study was adequately powered, length of stay did not differ between the vitamin D and placebo groups, said Dr. Karin Amrein of the Medical University of Graz, Austria, and her associates. “In the overall cohort, hospital and 6-month mortality rates were numerically lower in the vitamin D3 group, but these differences were not significant,” the researchers said.

A subgroup of patients with severe vitamin D deficiency did have significantly lower hospital mortality when treated with vitamin D, compared with placebo, but the effect “should be considered hypothesis generating and requires further study,” the investigators concluded (JAMA 2014 Sept. 29 [doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13204]).

The randomized, double-blind, single-center trial enrolled 492 critically ill medical and surgical patients with serum vitamin D levels of 20 ng/mL or less. Patients received placebo or vitamin D3 at a loading dose of 540,000 IU, followed by a monthly maintenance dose of 90,000 IU for 5 months, the researchers said.

Length of hospital stay averaged 20.1 days for patients who received vitamin D and 19.3 days for the placebo group, the investigators reported.

Dr. Karin Amrein

Among patients who received vitamin D3, 28.3% died in the hospital, compared with 35.3% of the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.11), they said. Six-month mortality was 35.0% for the vitamin D3 group, compared with 42.9% for the placebo group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04), they said.

Among 200 patients with severe vitamin D deficiencies of 12 ng/mL or less, vitamin D3 treatment was linked to a 44% drop in risk of dying in the hospital, the researchers said (28.6% vs. 46.1% for placebo; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.90; P = .04).But length of hospital stay and 6-month mortality rates were similar between the two groups, they reported.

Drug maker Fresenius Kabi provided study medication and a grant to support the research. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and the Austrian National Bank also funded the study.

Dr Amrein reported and one coauthor reported receiving lecture fees from Fresenius Kabi. The authors reported no other relevant financial conflicts of interest.

High-dose vitamin D did not improve outcomes in critically ill, vitamin D­–deficient patients, compared with placebo, researchers reported in JAMA and at the annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

©Joss/Fotolia.com
Vitamin D3 treatment did not reduce hospital length of stay or mortality in critically ill, vitamin D-deficient patients.

Although the study was adequately powered, length of stay did not differ between the vitamin D and placebo groups, said Dr. Karin Amrein of the Medical University of Graz, Austria, and her associates. “In the overall cohort, hospital and 6-month mortality rates were numerically lower in the vitamin D3 group, but these differences were not significant,” the researchers said.

A subgroup of patients with severe vitamin D deficiency did have significantly lower hospital mortality when treated with vitamin D, compared with placebo, but the effect “should be considered hypothesis generating and requires further study,” the investigators concluded (JAMA 2014 Sept. 29 [doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13204]).

The randomized, double-blind, single-center trial enrolled 492 critically ill medical and surgical patients with serum vitamin D levels of 20 ng/mL or less. Patients received placebo or vitamin D3 at a loading dose of 540,000 IU, followed by a monthly maintenance dose of 90,000 IU for 5 months, the researchers said.

Length of hospital stay averaged 20.1 days for patients who received vitamin D and 19.3 days for the placebo group, the investigators reported.

Dr. Karin Amrein

Among patients who received vitamin D3, 28.3% died in the hospital, compared with 35.3% of the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.11), they said. Six-month mortality was 35.0% for the vitamin D3 group, compared with 42.9% for the placebo group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58-1.04), they said.

Among 200 patients with severe vitamin D deficiencies of 12 ng/mL or less, vitamin D3 treatment was linked to a 44% drop in risk of dying in the hospital, the researchers said (28.6% vs. 46.1% for placebo; HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.90; P = .04).But length of hospital stay and 6-month mortality rates were similar between the two groups, they reported.

Drug maker Fresenius Kabi provided study medication and a grant to support the research. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and the Austrian National Bank also funded the study.

Dr Amrein reported and one coauthor reported receiving lecture fees from Fresenius Kabi. The authors reported no other relevant financial conflicts of interest.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
High-dose treatment did not benefit ICU patients with vitamin D deficiency
Display Headline
High-dose treatment did not benefit ICU patients with vitamin D deficiency
Legacy Keywords
Vitamin D, supplements, critical care, ICU
Legacy Keywords
Vitamin D, supplements, critical care, ICU
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Vitamin D3 treatment did not reduce hospital length of stay or mortality in critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency.

Major finding: Length of hospital stay averaged 20.1 days for patients who received vitamin D and 19.3 days for the placebo group (P = 0.98).

Data source: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center trial of 492 critically ill medical and surgical patients with vitamin D deficiency of 20 ng per mL or less.

Disclosures: Drug maker Fresenius Kabi provided study medication and a grant to support the research. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and the Austrian National Bank also funded the study. Dr Amrein reported and one coauthor reported receiving lecture fees from Fresenius Kabi. The authors reported no other relevant financial conflicts of interest.

First appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography released for suspected pediatric heart disease

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
First appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography released for suspected pediatric heart disease

Appropriate use criteria of transthoracic echocardiography for suspected pediatric heart disease in outpatient settings have been issued for the first time.

The criteria, a collaboration of nine societies, will appear on the websites of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

“Of the various diagnostic modalities, echocardiography remains the most readily available, noninvasive, and highly diagnostic tool for assessing cardiac structure, function and hemodynamics in those with suspected cardiac disease,” said Dr. Robert Campbell of Emory University, Atlanta, and his associates. Of the 113 potential indications for first-time use of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography in children and adolescents that they considered, 53 were considered appropriate, 28 possibly appropriate, and 32 rarely appropriate (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014 Sept. 30 [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.003]). The report addressed conditions such as arrhythmias and palpitations, syncope, murmurs, and systemic disorders.

The group collaborated with an Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) task force and an independent rating panel to produce the report. The criteria do not address posttest follow-up, inpatient pediatric echocardiography, or the assessment of children with known cardiac abnormalities, the authors said.

The writing group reported no funding sources or conflicts of interest. Three members of the rating panel and one member of the AUC task force reported financial relationships with Siemens Medical Systems or Excellus BCBS.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
pediatric heart disease, transthoracic echocardiography, syncope, murmur, palpitations,
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

Appropriate use criteria of transthoracic echocardiography for suspected pediatric heart disease in outpatient settings have been issued for the first time.

The criteria, a collaboration of nine societies, will appear on the websites of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

“Of the various diagnostic modalities, echocardiography remains the most readily available, noninvasive, and highly diagnostic tool for assessing cardiac structure, function and hemodynamics in those with suspected cardiac disease,” said Dr. Robert Campbell of Emory University, Atlanta, and his associates. Of the 113 potential indications for first-time use of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography in children and adolescents that they considered, 53 were considered appropriate, 28 possibly appropriate, and 32 rarely appropriate (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014 Sept. 30 [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.003]). The report addressed conditions such as arrhythmias and palpitations, syncope, murmurs, and systemic disorders.

The group collaborated with an Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) task force and an independent rating panel to produce the report. The criteria do not address posttest follow-up, inpatient pediatric echocardiography, or the assessment of children with known cardiac abnormalities, the authors said.

The writing group reported no funding sources or conflicts of interest. Three members of the rating panel and one member of the AUC task force reported financial relationships with Siemens Medical Systems or Excellus BCBS.

Appropriate use criteria of transthoracic echocardiography for suspected pediatric heart disease in outpatient settings have been issued for the first time.

The criteria, a collaboration of nine societies, will appear on the websites of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.

“Of the various diagnostic modalities, echocardiography remains the most readily available, noninvasive, and highly diagnostic tool for assessing cardiac structure, function and hemodynamics in those with suspected cardiac disease,” said Dr. Robert Campbell of Emory University, Atlanta, and his associates. Of the 113 potential indications for first-time use of outpatient transthoracic echocardiography in children and adolescents that they considered, 53 were considered appropriate, 28 possibly appropriate, and 32 rarely appropriate (J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014 Sept. 30 [doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.003]). The report addressed conditions such as arrhythmias and palpitations, syncope, murmurs, and systemic disorders.

The group collaborated with an Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) task force and an independent rating panel to produce the report. The criteria do not address posttest follow-up, inpatient pediatric echocardiography, or the assessment of children with known cardiac abnormalities, the authors said.

The writing group reported no funding sources or conflicts of interest. Three members of the rating panel and one member of the AUC task force reported financial relationships with Siemens Medical Systems or Excellus BCBS.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
First appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography released for suspected pediatric heart disease
Display Headline
First appropriate use criteria for transthoracic echocardiography released for suspected pediatric heart disease
Legacy Keywords
pediatric heart disease, transthoracic echocardiography, syncope, murmur, palpitations,
Legacy Keywords
pediatric heart disease, transthoracic echocardiography, syncope, murmur, palpitations,
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Fenoldopam missed renal endpoint, caused hypotension in cardiac surgery patients

Article Type
Changed
Display Headline
Fenoldopam missed renal endpoint, caused hypotension in cardiac surgery patients

In its largest randomized controlled trial to date, fenoldopam did not lessen the need for dialysis after cardiac surgery and caused significantly more hypotension than did placebo, investigators reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of cardiac surgery, and no drugs are known to effectively treat it, said Dr. Tiziana Bove of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan. “Given the cost of fenoldopam, the lack of effectiveness, and the increased incidence of hypotension, the use of this agent for renal protection in these patients is not justified,” said Dr. Bove and her associates.

The findings were published in JAMA simultaneously with the presentation at the congress ( 2014 Sept 29 [doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13573]).

Fenoldopam is a selective dopamine receptor D1 agonist and vasodilator. For the study, 667 patients who had developed early acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery received either an intravenous continuous infusion of fenoldopam at a starting dose of 0.1 mcg/kg per minute or placebo, the investigators said. Rates of dialysis and 30-day mortality were similar between the two groups. In all, 20% of the treatment group received renal replacement therapy, compared with 18% of the placebo group, and 30-day mortality rates were 23% and 22%, respectively, they said. Furthermore, hypotension developed in 26% of treated patients, compared with 15% of the placebo group (P = .001), the researchers said. The study was stopped for futility after an interim analysis, the researchers noted.The Italian Ministry of Health funded the study. Teva supplied the study drug. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

Author and Disclosure Information

Publications
Topics
Legacy Keywords
cardiac surgery, hypotension, fenoldopam, kidney injury
Author and Disclosure Information

Author and Disclosure Information

In its largest randomized controlled trial to date, fenoldopam did not lessen the need for dialysis after cardiac surgery and caused significantly more hypotension than did placebo, investigators reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of cardiac surgery, and no drugs are known to effectively treat it, said Dr. Tiziana Bove of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan. “Given the cost of fenoldopam, the lack of effectiveness, and the increased incidence of hypotension, the use of this agent for renal protection in these patients is not justified,” said Dr. Bove and her associates.

The findings were published in JAMA simultaneously with the presentation at the congress ( 2014 Sept 29 [doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13573]).

Fenoldopam is a selective dopamine receptor D1 agonist and vasodilator. For the study, 667 patients who had developed early acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery received either an intravenous continuous infusion of fenoldopam at a starting dose of 0.1 mcg/kg per minute or placebo, the investigators said. Rates of dialysis and 30-day mortality were similar between the two groups. In all, 20% of the treatment group received renal replacement therapy, compared with 18% of the placebo group, and 30-day mortality rates were 23% and 22%, respectively, they said. Furthermore, hypotension developed in 26% of treated patients, compared with 15% of the placebo group (P = .001), the researchers said. The study was stopped for futility after an interim analysis, the researchers noted.The Italian Ministry of Health funded the study. Teva supplied the study drug. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

In its largest randomized controlled trial to date, fenoldopam did not lessen the need for dialysis after cardiac surgery and caused significantly more hypotension than did placebo, investigators reported at the annual congress of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of cardiac surgery, and no drugs are known to effectively treat it, said Dr. Tiziana Bove of IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan. “Given the cost of fenoldopam, the lack of effectiveness, and the increased incidence of hypotension, the use of this agent for renal protection in these patients is not justified,” said Dr. Bove and her associates.

The findings were published in JAMA simultaneously with the presentation at the congress ( 2014 Sept 29 [doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13573]).

Fenoldopam is a selective dopamine receptor D1 agonist and vasodilator. For the study, 667 patients who had developed early acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery received either an intravenous continuous infusion of fenoldopam at a starting dose of 0.1 mcg/kg per minute or placebo, the investigators said. Rates of dialysis and 30-day mortality were similar between the two groups. In all, 20% of the treatment group received renal replacement therapy, compared with 18% of the placebo group, and 30-day mortality rates were 23% and 22%, respectively, they said. Furthermore, hypotension developed in 26% of treated patients, compared with 15% of the placebo group (P = .001), the researchers said. The study was stopped for futility after an interim analysis, the researchers noted.The Italian Ministry of Health funded the study. Teva supplied the study drug. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

References

References

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Fenoldopam missed renal endpoint, caused hypotension in cardiac surgery patients
Display Headline
Fenoldopam missed renal endpoint, caused hypotension in cardiac surgery patients
Legacy Keywords
cardiac surgery, hypotension, fenoldopam, kidney injury
Legacy Keywords
cardiac surgery, hypotension, fenoldopam, kidney injury
Article Source

PURLs Copyright

Inside the Article

Vitals

Key clinical point: Fenoldopam did not lessen early kidney injury after cardiac surgery and caused hypotension.

Major finding: Fenoldopam did not reduce the rate of dialysis or 30-day mortality after cardiac surgery, and 26% of treated patients developed hypotension compared with 15% of the placebo group (P = .001).

Data source: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of 667 patients with early acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery.

Disclosures: The Italian Ministry of Health funded the study. Teva supplied the study drug. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.