User login
Quality of Life for Males With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Quality of Life for Males With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a public health threat, with a global prevalence of 4.8% and a prevalence in males that increases with age, from 1.3% between ages 45 and 54 years to 12.5% between ages 75 and 84 years.1 AAA is often asymptomatic until it ruptures and can become life-threatening, with mortality rates near 90% in the event of rupture with survival rates of about 50% to 70% for individuals with rupture who require urgent surgical intervention.2,3 Males experience AAA at 4 times the rate of females.4
Previous research has found that the awareness of having an AAA causes anxiety that some have described as “living with a ticking time bomb.”5 Others reported worries and concerns about life’s fragility and mortality due to an AAA diagnosis.6 However, the psychological impact on the individuals’ quality of life (QoL) remains unclear, especially for individuals with a small AAA (< 5.5 cm).7 Factors such as age, male sex, smoking, family history, hypertension, carotid artery disease, and hypercholesterolemia have been strongly associated with increased growth rate and the risk of small AAA ruptures.8,9
Most patients with a small AAA enter surveillance awaiting future repair and not only have the anxiety of living with an AAA despite the low risk of rupture, but also a worse QoL than those who have undergone repair.10,11 However, data are sparse regarding the effects on QoL of knowing they have an AAA, whether repaired or not. This study sought to examine the impact an AAA diagnosis had on male QoL at the initial investigation and after 12 months.
Methods
This prospective study was examined and approved by the Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System (NCHCS) Institutional Review Board. It was conducted at the Sacramento US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center from January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2022. Patients were identified through the vascular clinic. One hundred sixteen patients with AAA were eligible and agreed to participate. Of these, 91 (78%) completed the survey at baseline and 12 months later. Participation was voluntary; written informed consent was obtained from every patient before completing the survey. This study included only male patients due to their higher prevalence than female patients.4 Patients were also eligible if they were aged > 18 years and had a previously known AAA that was being followed with a recorded clinical imaging study in the NCHCS vascular clinic. Patients were excluded if they were unable to return for their 12-month follow-up investigation, were incapable of giving informed consent, were unable to complete the 12-item short form health survey version 2 (SF-12v2), had a documented history of psychiatric illness, or refused to participate. The SF-12v2, an abbreviated version of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), is a generic health-related quality-of-life survey that measures 8 domains of general health status: general health (GH), physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). A higher number on the QoL scale indicates better QoL. The GH, PF, RP, and BP scales yield a physical component score (PCS), and the VT, SF, RE, and MH scales generate a mental component score (MCS). Although SF-12v2 has not been validated for patients with AAA, it has been widely used and validated to measure health-related QoL in cohorts of healthy and chronically ill individuals.12,13
Analysis
Descriptive statistics, including means, SDs, frequency, percentages, 95% CIs, and correlations were calculated. The t test was used to analyze differences in mean scores. For continuous variables, such as SF-12v2 domains, PCS, and MCS, mean, SD, 95% CI, and range were determined. Comparisons were performed using X2 or t test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Clinical risk factors, including age, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, and smoking status, were also recorded.
Results
Between January 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, 91 patients were diagnosed with an AAA and completed the survey at the initial and 12-month investigations. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 76.0 (5.6) years (range, 64-93) and BMI of 29.7 (6.4). Comorbid diabetes was present in 31% of patients, hypertension in 75%, hyperlipidemia 66%, and coronary artery disease in 12% (Table 1). Most patients smoked tobacco: 71% indicated previous use and 22% were current users.

When comparing baseline vs 12-month follow-up, patients indicated a higher QoL in GH (3.2 vs 3.5, respectively; P < .05) and BP (3.1 vs 3.6, respectively; P < .05). No statistically significant difference was seen PF, RP, VT, SF, RE, MH, as well as PCS and MCS between baseline and follow-up with respect to QoL (P < .05). However, the 5 domains of SF-12v2: PF, RP, SF, RE, MH, and PCS had lower QoL scores at the 12-month follow-up when compared with baseline, but with no statistically significant difference between both investigations (Table 2).

Discussion
Previous studies have characterized the results of QoL measures as subjective because they are based on patient perceptions of their physical and psychological condition.14,15 However, SF-36 and SF-12v2 responses provide a multifaceted account that encompasses the physical, psychological, and social aspects of QoL. Despite being the most widely used generic instrument in many fields of medicine, SF-36 is time consuming for clinicians who may prefer simpler and more time-efficient instruments.16-18 The SF-12v2 not only imposes less burden on respondents but also generates accurate summary scores for patients physical and mental health.19
The replicability of SF-12v2 PCS and MCS scores has been demonstrated. In the United Kingdom, Jenkinson and Layte constructed SF-12v2 summary measures from a large scale dataset by sending the SF-36 and other questions on health and lifestyles to 9332 individuals and compared the results of the SF-36 and SF-12v2 across diverse patient groups (eg, Parkinson disease, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, benign prostatic hypertrophy). Results from SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, and PCS-12v2 (ρ, 0.94; P < .001) and SF-12v2 MCS (ρ, 0.96; P < .001) were found to be highly correlated, and also produced similar results, both in the community sample and across a variety of disease-specific groups.20
The aim of this longitudinal observational study was to measure the QoL of males with an AAA ≥ 3.0 cm at baseline and 12 months later. The mean age of participants was 76 years, which aligns with previous research that found the prevalence of AAAs increased with age.1 Study participants had a mean BMI of 29.7, which also supports previous research that indicated that obesity is independently associated with an AAA.21 Patients with an AAA and a history of smoking (former or current), hypertension, or hyperlipidemia had lower mean scores for 3 of 8 SF-12v2 domains at the 12-month follow-up.
These findings support previous research that indicated smoking is not only a very strong risk factor for the presence of an AAA but also associated with increased rates of expansion and the risk of rupture in patients with an AAA.22 Bath et al found that patients with an AAA compared to patients without an AAA were older (age 72.6 vs 69.8 years; P < .001), had a higher BMI (28.1 vs 27.0; P < .001), were more likely to be a current smoker (15.1% vs 5.2%; P < .001), and were more likely to have diabetes (18.8% vs 10.0%; P < .001), ischemic heart disease (12.2% vs 4.4%; P < .001), high cholesterol (53.2% vs 30.8%; P <. 001), previous stroke (6.1% vs 2.9%; P < .001), and a previous myocardial infarction (21.1% vs 5.8%; P < .001).23 Lesjak et al found that men with AAA reported significantly lower scores in the domains of social functioning, pain, and general health 6 months after ultrasound compared with men without AAA.24
Previous research indicates that patients with an AAA have a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases and comorbidities that may impact their perceived QoL. In a study assessing cardiovascular risk in 2323 patients with a small AAA, Bath et al found a high prevalence of coronary artery disease (44.9%), myocardial infarction (26.8%), heart failure (4.4%) and cerebrovascular accident (14.0%) which may have contributed to the decreased level of self-perceived QoL in these patients.25
This aligned with a study by Golledge et al, who found that participants diagnosed with an AAA and peripheral artery disease not only had significantly poorer QoL scores in 5 SF-36 domains (PF, RP, GH, VT, and PCS)when compared with participants diagnosed with an AAA alone. They also had significantly poorer QoL scores in 7 domains of the SF-36 (PF, RP, GH, VT, SF, RE, and PCS) when compared with controls without an AAA.26
Our analysis found that males with an AAA had a rise in SF-12v2 QoL scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the GH and BP domains. There was no statistically significant difference in QoL in the other 6 domains (PF, RP, VT, SF, RE, and MH) between the initial and 12-month investigations. Bath et al also found that men with an AAA had a transient reduction in mental QoL during the first year after the initial screening but returned to baseline.23
Strengths and Limitations
This study is notable for its sample of patients who previously had a diagnosed AAA that were followed with a recorded clinical imaging study and the use of a validated QoL measure (SF-12v2) that provided virtually identical summary scores (PCS and MCS) as the SF-36.27 However, this study was limited by the brevity of the SF-12v2 instrument which made it difficult to extract sufficient reliable information for the 8 domains.28 Subjective perception of patients is another limitation inherent to any QoL study. QoL scores were not available before the initial investigation. Measuring QoL at baseline and 12 months later does not capture the potential fluctuations and changes in QoL that the patient may experience some months later. Another limitation arises from the fact that the AAA patient population in the study included patients under surveillance and patients who had undergone repair.
Fourteen patients (15%) had received AAA repair: 10 had endovascular reconstruction and 4 had open surgical repair. Including patients with a previous AAA repair may have influenced reported QoL levels. Suckow et al performed a 2-phase study on 1008 patients, 351 (35%) were under surveillance and 657 (65%) had undergone repair. In that study, patients under AAA surveillance had worse emotional impact scores compared with patients with repair (22 vs 13; P < .001).11 Additionally, the size of the abdominal aorta at the time of survey was not addressed in the study, which could constitute explanatory variables.
Conclusions
This study found higher QoL at 12-month follow-up compared to baseline in both the GH and BP domains of the SF-12v2 health survey for male veterans with an AAA. Periodic QoL assessments for patients with an AAA may be helpful in tracking QoL course, minimizing their physical and psychological concerns, and improving overall care and support. However, further research is necessary to assess the QoL of patients with an AAA who are under surveillance compared with those who had an aneurysm repair to accurately measure the impact of an AAA on QoL.
- Altobelli E, Rapacchietta L, Profeta VF, et al. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in population- based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2805. doi:10.3390/ijerph15122805
- Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2-77.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044
- Kent KC. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2101-2108. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1401430
- Harthun NL. Current issues in the treatment of women with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Gend Med. 2008;5:36-43.
- Aoki H. Taking control of the time bomb in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Circ J. 2016;80:314-315. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1350
- Damhus CS, Siersma V, Hansson A, Bang CW, Brodersen J. Psychosocial consequences of screeningdetected abdominal aortic aneurisms: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021;39:459-465. doi:10.1080/02813432.2021.2004713
- Ericsson A, Kumlien C, Ching S, Carlson E, Molassiotis A. Impact on quality of life of men with screening-detected abdominal aortic aneurysms attending regular follow ups: a narrative literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:589-596. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.012
- Galyfos G, Voulalas G, Stamatatos I, et al. Small abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we wait? Vasc Dis Manag. 2015;12:E152-E159.
- Kristensen KL, Dahl M, Rasmussen LM, et al. Glycated hemoglobin is associated with the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:730-736. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308874
- Xiao-Yan L, Yu-Kui M, Li-Hui L. Risk factors for preoperative anxiety and depression in patients scheduled for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Chine Med J. 2018;131:1951-1957. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.238154
- Suckow BD, Schanzer AS, Hoel AW, et al. A novel quality of life instrument for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:809-815. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.01.018
- Flatz A, Casillas A, Stringhini S, et al. Association between education and quality of diabetes care in Switzerland. Int J Gen Med. 2015;8:87-92. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S77139
- Christensen AV, Bjorner JB, Ekholm O, et al. Increased risk of mortality and readmission associated with lower SF-12 scores in cardiac patients: Results from the national DenHeart study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020;19:330-338. doi:10.1177/1474515119885480
- Hamming JF, De Vries J. Measuring quality of life. Br J Surg. 2007;94:923-924. doi:10.1002/bjs.5948
- Urbach DR. Measuring quality of life after surgery. Surg Innov. 2005;12:161-165. doi:10.1177/ 155335060501200216
- Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Kosinski M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36® health survey in medicare managed care. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004;25:5.
- Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30:473-483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
- Takayoshi K, Mototsugu T, Tomohiro T, et al. Health-related quality of life prospectively evaluated by the 8-item short form after endovascular repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Heart Vessels. 2017;32:960- 968. doi:10.1007/s00380-017-0956-9
- Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, et al. Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke. 1999;30:1213-1217. doi:10.1161/01.str.30.6.1213
- Jenkinson C, Layte R. The development and testing of the UK SF-12. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:14-18. doi:10.1177/135581969700200105
- Golledge J, Clancy P, Jamrozik K, et al. Obesity, adipokines, and abdominal aortic aneurysm: Health in Men study. Circulation. 2007;116:2275-2279. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.717926
- Norman PE, Curci JA. Understanding the effects of tobacco smoke on the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1473-1477. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300158
- Bath MF, Sidloff D, Saratzis A, et al. Impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on quality of life. BJS. 2018;105:203-208. doi:10.1002/bjs.10721
- Lesjak M, Boreland F, Lyle D, Sidford J, Flecknoe-Brown S, Fletcher J. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: does it affect men’s quality of life? Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18:284-288. doi:10.1071/PY11131
- Bath MF, Gokani VJ, Sidloff DA, et al. Systematic review of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular death in patients with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2015;102:866-872. doi:10.1002/bjs.9837
- Golledge J, Pinchbeck J, Rowbotham SE, et al. Health-related quality of life amongst people diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral artery disease and the effect of fenofibrate. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14583. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71454-4
- Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med. 1997;19:179- 186. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024606
- White MK, Maher SM, Rizio AA, et al. A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1757-1767. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1851-2
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a public health threat, with a global prevalence of 4.8% and a prevalence in males that increases with age, from 1.3% between ages 45 and 54 years to 12.5% between ages 75 and 84 years.1 AAA is often asymptomatic until it ruptures and can become life-threatening, with mortality rates near 90% in the event of rupture with survival rates of about 50% to 70% for individuals with rupture who require urgent surgical intervention.2,3 Males experience AAA at 4 times the rate of females.4
Previous research has found that the awareness of having an AAA causes anxiety that some have described as “living with a ticking time bomb.”5 Others reported worries and concerns about life’s fragility and mortality due to an AAA diagnosis.6 However, the psychological impact on the individuals’ quality of life (QoL) remains unclear, especially for individuals with a small AAA (< 5.5 cm).7 Factors such as age, male sex, smoking, family history, hypertension, carotid artery disease, and hypercholesterolemia have been strongly associated with increased growth rate and the risk of small AAA ruptures.8,9
Most patients with a small AAA enter surveillance awaiting future repair and not only have the anxiety of living with an AAA despite the low risk of rupture, but also a worse QoL than those who have undergone repair.10,11 However, data are sparse regarding the effects on QoL of knowing they have an AAA, whether repaired or not. This study sought to examine the impact an AAA diagnosis had on male QoL at the initial investigation and after 12 months.
Methods
This prospective study was examined and approved by the Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System (NCHCS) Institutional Review Board. It was conducted at the Sacramento US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center from January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2022. Patients were identified through the vascular clinic. One hundred sixteen patients with AAA were eligible and agreed to participate. Of these, 91 (78%) completed the survey at baseline and 12 months later. Participation was voluntary; written informed consent was obtained from every patient before completing the survey. This study included only male patients due to their higher prevalence than female patients.4 Patients were also eligible if they were aged > 18 years and had a previously known AAA that was being followed with a recorded clinical imaging study in the NCHCS vascular clinic. Patients were excluded if they were unable to return for their 12-month follow-up investigation, were incapable of giving informed consent, were unable to complete the 12-item short form health survey version 2 (SF-12v2), had a documented history of psychiatric illness, or refused to participate. The SF-12v2, an abbreviated version of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), is a generic health-related quality-of-life survey that measures 8 domains of general health status: general health (GH), physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). A higher number on the QoL scale indicates better QoL. The GH, PF, RP, and BP scales yield a physical component score (PCS), and the VT, SF, RE, and MH scales generate a mental component score (MCS). Although SF-12v2 has not been validated for patients with AAA, it has been widely used and validated to measure health-related QoL in cohorts of healthy and chronically ill individuals.12,13
Analysis
Descriptive statistics, including means, SDs, frequency, percentages, 95% CIs, and correlations were calculated. The t test was used to analyze differences in mean scores. For continuous variables, such as SF-12v2 domains, PCS, and MCS, mean, SD, 95% CI, and range were determined. Comparisons were performed using X2 or t test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Clinical risk factors, including age, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, and smoking status, were also recorded.
Results
Between January 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, 91 patients were diagnosed with an AAA and completed the survey at the initial and 12-month investigations. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 76.0 (5.6) years (range, 64-93) and BMI of 29.7 (6.4). Comorbid diabetes was present in 31% of patients, hypertension in 75%, hyperlipidemia 66%, and coronary artery disease in 12% (Table 1). Most patients smoked tobacco: 71% indicated previous use and 22% were current users.

When comparing baseline vs 12-month follow-up, patients indicated a higher QoL in GH (3.2 vs 3.5, respectively; P < .05) and BP (3.1 vs 3.6, respectively; P < .05). No statistically significant difference was seen PF, RP, VT, SF, RE, MH, as well as PCS and MCS between baseline and follow-up with respect to QoL (P < .05). However, the 5 domains of SF-12v2: PF, RP, SF, RE, MH, and PCS had lower QoL scores at the 12-month follow-up when compared with baseline, but with no statistically significant difference between both investigations (Table 2).

Discussion
Previous studies have characterized the results of QoL measures as subjective because they are based on patient perceptions of their physical and psychological condition.14,15 However, SF-36 and SF-12v2 responses provide a multifaceted account that encompasses the physical, psychological, and social aspects of QoL. Despite being the most widely used generic instrument in many fields of medicine, SF-36 is time consuming for clinicians who may prefer simpler and more time-efficient instruments.16-18 The SF-12v2 not only imposes less burden on respondents but also generates accurate summary scores for patients physical and mental health.19
The replicability of SF-12v2 PCS and MCS scores has been demonstrated. In the United Kingdom, Jenkinson and Layte constructed SF-12v2 summary measures from a large scale dataset by sending the SF-36 and other questions on health and lifestyles to 9332 individuals and compared the results of the SF-36 and SF-12v2 across diverse patient groups (eg, Parkinson disease, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, benign prostatic hypertrophy). Results from SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, and PCS-12v2 (ρ, 0.94; P < .001) and SF-12v2 MCS (ρ, 0.96; P < .001) were found to be highly correlated, and also produced similar results, both in the community sample and across a variety of disease-specific groups.20
The aim of this longitudinal observational study was to measure the QoL of males with an AAA ≥ 3.0 cm at baseline and 12 months later. The mean age of participants was 76 years, which aligns with previous research that found the prevalence of AAAs increased with age.1 Study participants had a mean BMI of 29.7, which also supports previous research that indicated that obesity is independently associated with an AAA.21 Patients with an AAA and a history of smoking (former or current), hypertension, or hyperlipidemia had lower mean scores for 3 of 8 SF-12v2 domains at the 12-month follow-up.
These findings support previous research that indicated smoking is not only a very strong risk factor for the presence of an AAA but also associated with increased rates of expansion and the risk of rupture in patients with an AAA.22 Bath et al found that patients with an AAA compared to patients without an AAA were older (age 72.6 vs 69.8 years; P < .001), had a higher BMI (28.1 vs 27.0; P < .001), were more likely to be a current smoker (15.1% vs 5.2%; P < .001), and were more likely to have diabetes (18.8% vs 10.0%; P < .001), ischemic heart disease (12.2% vs 4.4%; P < .001), high cholesterol (53.2% vs 30.8%; P <. 001), previous stroke (6.1% vs 2.9%; P < .001), and a previous myocardial infarction (21.1% vs 5.8%; P < .001).23 Lesjak et al found that men with AAA reported significantly lower scores in the domains of social functioning, pain, and general health 6 months after ultrasound compared with men without AAA.24
Previous research indicates that patients with an AAA have a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases and comorbidities that may impact their perceived QoL. In a study assessing cardiovascular risk in 2323 patients with a small AAA, Bath et al found a high prevalence of coronary artery disease (44.9%), myocardial infarction (26.8%), heart failure (4.4%) and cerebrovascular accident (14.0%) which may have contributed to the decreased level of self-perceived QoL in these patients.25
This aligned with a study by Golledge et al, who found that participants diagnosed with an AAA and peripheral artery disease not only had significantly poorer QoL scores in 5 SF-36 domains (PF, RP, GH, VT, and PCS)when compared with participants diagnosed with an AAA alone. They also had significantly poorer QoL scores in 7 domains of the SF-36 (PF, RP, GH, VT, SF, RE, and PCS) when compared with controls without an AAA.26
Our analysis found that males with an AAA had a rise in SF-12v2 QoL scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the GH and BP domains. There was no statistically significant difference in QoL in the other 6 domains (PF, RP, VT, SF, RE, and MH) between the initial and 12-month investigations. Bath et al also found that men with an AAA had a transient reduction in mental QoL during the first year after the initial screening but returned to baseline.23
Strengths and Limitations
This study is notable for its sample of patients who previously had a diagnosed AAA that were followed with a recorded clinical imaging study and the use of a validated QoL measure (SF-12v2) that provided virtually identical summary scores (PCS and MCS) as the SF-36.27 However, this study was limited by the brevity of the SF-12v2 instrument which made it difficult to extract sufficient reliable information for the 8 domains.28 Subjective perception of patients is another limitation inherent to any QoL study. QoL scores were not available before the initial investigation. Measuring QoL at baseline and 12 months later does not capture the potential fluctuations and changes in QoL that the patient may experience some months later. Another limitation arises from the fact that the AAA patient population in the study included patients under surveillance and patients who had undergone repair.
Fourteen patients (15%) had received AAA repair: 10 had endovascular reconstruction and 4 had open surgical repair. Including patients with a previous AAA repair may have influenced reported QoL levels. Suckow et al performed a 2-phase study on 1008 patients, 351 (35%) were under surveillance and 657 (65%) had undergone repair. In that study, patients under AAA surveillance had worse emotional impact scores compared with patients with repair (22 vs 13; P < .001).11 Additionally, the size of the abdominal aorta at the time of survey was not addressed in the study, which could constitute explanatory variables.
Conclusions
This study found higher QoL at 12-month follow-up compared to baseline in both the GH and BP domains of the SF-12v2 health survey for male veterans with an AAA. Periodic QoL assessments for patients with an AAA may be helpful in tracking QoL course, minimizing their physical and psychological concerns, and improving overall care and support. However, further research is necessary to assess the QoL of patients with an AAA who are under surveillance compared with those who had an aneurysm repair to accurately measure the impact of an AAA on QoL.
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a public health threat, with a global prevalence of 4.8% and a prevalence in males that increases with age, from 1.3% between ages 45 and 54 years to 12.5% between ages 75 and 84 years.1 AAA is often asymptomatic until it ruptures and can become life-threatening, with mortality rates near 90% in the event of rupture with survival rates of about 50% to 70% for individuals with rupture who require urgent surgical intervention.2,3 Males experience AAA at 4 times the rate of females.4
Previous research has found that the awareness of having an AAA causes anxiety that some have described as “living with a ticking time bomb.”5 Others reported worries and concerns about life’s fragility and mortality due to an AAA diagnosis.6 However, the psychological impact on the individuals’ quality of life (QoL) remains unclear, especially for individuals with a small AAA (< 5.5 cm).7 Factors such as age, male sex, smoking, family history, hypertension, carotid artery disease, and hypercholesterolemia have been strongly associated with increased growth rate and the risk of small AAA ruptures.8,9
Most patients with a small AAA enter surveillance awaiting future repair and not only have the anxiety of living with an AAA despite the low risk of rupture, but also a worse QoL than those who have undergone repair.10,11 However, data are sparse regarding the effects on QoL of knowing they have an AAA, whether repaired or not. This study sought to examine the impact an AAA diagnosis had on male QoL at the initial investigation and after 12 months.
Methods
This prospective study was examined and approved by the Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System (NCHCS) Institutional Review Board. It was conducted at the Sacramento US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center from January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2022. Patients were identified through the vascular clinic. One hundred sixteen patients with AAA were eligible and agreed to participate. Of these, 91 (78%) completed the survey at baseline and 12 months later. Participation was voluntary; written informed consent was obtained from every patient before completing the survey. This study included only male patients due to their higher prevalence than female patients.4 Patients were also eligible if they were aged > 18 years and had a previously known AAA that was being followed with a recorded clinical imaging study in the NCHCS vascular clinic. Patients were excluded if they were unable to return for their 12-month follow-up investigation, were incapable of giving informed consent, were unable to complete the 12-item short form health survey version 2 (SF-12v2), had a documented history of psychiatric illness, or refused to participate. The SF-12v2, an abbreviated version of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36), is a generic health-related quality-of-life survey that measures 8 domains of general health status: general health (GH), physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). A higher number on the QoL scale indicates better QoL. The GH, PF, RP, and BP scales yield a physical component score (PCS), and the VT, SF, RE, and MH scales generate a mental component score (MCS). Although SF-12v2 has not been validated for patients with AAA, it has been widely used and validated to measure health-related QoL in cohorts of healthy and chronically ill individuals.12,13
Analysis
Descriptive statistics, including means, SDs, frequency, percentages, 95% CIs, and correlations were calculated. The t test was used to analyze differences in mean scores. For continuous variables, such as SF-12v2 domains, PCS, and MCS, mean, SD, 95% CI, and range were determined. Comparisons were performed using X2 or t test. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Clinical risk factors, including age, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, and smoking status, were also recorded.
Results
Between January 1, 2019, and February 28, 2022, 91 patients were diagnosed with an AAA and completed the survey at the initial and 12-month investigations. Patients had a mean (SD) age of 76.0 (5.6) years (range, 64-93) and BMI of 29.7 (6.4). Comorbid diabetes was present in 31% of patients, hypertension in 75%, hyperlipidemia 66%, and coronary artery disease in 12% (Table 1). Most patients smoked tobacco: 71% indicated previous use and 22% were current users.

When comparing baseline vs 12-month follow-up, patients indicated a higher QoL in GH (3.2 vs 3.5, respectively; P < .05) and BP (3.1 vs 3.6, respectively; P < .05). No statistically significant difference was seen PF, RP, VT, SF, RE, MH, as well as PCS and MCS between baseline and follow-up with respect to QoL (P < .05). However, the 5 domains of SF-12v2: PF, RP, SF, RE, MH, and PCS had lower QoL scores at the 12-month follow-up when compared with baseline, but with no statistically significant difference between both investigations (Table 2).

Discussion
Previous studies have characterized the results of QoL measures as subjective because they are based on patient perceptions of their physical and psychological condition.14,15 However, SF-36 and SF-12v2 responses provide a multifaceted account that encompasses the physical, psychological, and social aspects of QoL. Despite being the most widely used generic instrument in many fields of medicine, SF-36 is time consuming for clinicians who may prefer simpler and more time-efficient instruments.16-18 The SF-12v2 not only imposes less burden on respondents but also generates accurate summary scores for patients physical and mental health.19
The replicability of SF-12v2 PCS and MCS scores has been demonstrated. In the United Kingdom, Jenkinson and Layte constructed SF-12v2 summary measures from a large scale dataset by sending the SF-36 and other questions on health and lifestyles to 9332 individuals and compared the results of the SF-36 and SF-12v2 across diverse patient groups (eg, Parkinson disease, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, benign prostatic hypertrophy). Results from SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, and PCS-12v2 (ρ, 0.94; P < .001) and SF-12v2 MCS (ρ, 0.96; P < .001) were found to be highly correlated, and also produced similar results, both in the community sample and across a variety of disease-specific groups.20
The aim of this longitudinal observational study was to measure the QoL of males with an AAA ≥ 3.0 cm at baseline and 12 months later. The mean age of participants was 76 years, which aligns with previous research that found the prevalence of AAAs increased with age.1 Study participants had a mean BMI of 29.7, which also supports previous research that indicated that obesity is independently associated with an AAA.21 Patients with an AAA and a history of smoking (former or current), hypertension, or hyperlipidemia had lower mean scores for 3 of 8 SF-12v2 domains at the 12-month follow-up.
These findings support previous research that indicated smoking is not only a very strong risk factor for the presence of an AAA but also associated with increased rates of expansion and the risk of rupture in patients with an AAA.22 Bath et al found that patients with an AAA compared to patients without an AAA were older (age 72.6 vs 69.8 years; P < .001), had a higher BMI (28.1 vs 27.0; P < .001), were more likely to be a current smoker (15.1% vs 5.2%; P < .001), and were more likely to have diabetes (18.8% vs 10.0%; P < .001), ischemic heart disease (12.2% vs 4.4%; P < .001), high cholesterol (53.2% vs 30.8%; P <. 001), previous stroke (6.1% vs 2.9%; P < .001), and a previous myocardial infarction (21.1% vs 5.8%; P < .001).23 Lesjak et al found that men with AAA reported significantly lower scores in the domains of social functioning, pain, and general health 6 months after ultrasound compared with men without AAA.24
Previous research indicates that patients with an AAA have a higher risk of cardiovascular diseases and comorbidities that may impact their perceived QoL. In a study assessing cardiovascular risk in 2323 patients with a small AAA, Bath et al found a high prevalence of coronary artery disease (44.9%), myocardial infarction (26.8%), heart failure (4.4%) and cerebrovascular accident (14.0%) which may have contributed to the decreased level of self-perceived QoL in these patients.25
This aligned with a study by Golledge et al, who found that participants diagnosed with an AAA and peripheral artery disease not only had significantly poorer QoL scores in 5 SF-36 domains (PF, RP, GH, VT, and PCS)when compared with participants diagnosed with an AAA alone. They also had significantly poorer QoL scores in 7 domains of the SF-36 (PF, RP, GH, VT, SF, RE, and PCS) when compared with controls without an AAA.26
Our analysis found that males with an AAA had a rise in SF-12v2 QoL scores from baseline to 12-month follow-up in the GH and BP domains. There was no statistically significant difference in QoL in the other 6 domains (PF, RP, VT, SF, RE, and MH) between the initial and 12-month investigations. Bath et al also found that men with an AAA had a transient reduction in mental QoL during the first year after the initial screening but returned to baseline.23
Strengths and Limitations
This study is notable for its sample of patients who previously had a diagnosed AAA that were followed with a recorded clinical imaging study and the use of a validated QoL measure (SF-12v2) that provided virtually identical summary scores (PCS and MCS) as the SF-36.27 However, this study was limited by the brevity of the SF-12v2 instrument which made it difficult to extract sufficient reliable information for the 8 domains.28 Subjective perception of patients is another limitation inherent to any QoL study. QoL scores were not available before the initial investigation. Measuring QoL at baseline and 12 months later does not capture the potential fluctuations and changes in QoL that the patient may experience some months later. Another limitation arises from the fact that the AAA patient population in the study included patients under surveillance and patients who had undergone repair.
Fourteen patients (15%) had received AAA repair: 10 had endovascular reconstruction and 4 had open surgical repair. Including patients with a previous AAA repair may have influenced reported QoL levels. Suckow et al performed a 2-phase study on 1008 patients, 351 (35%) were under surveillance and 657 (65%) had undergone repair. In that study, patients under AAA surveillance had worse emotional impact scores compared with patients with repair (22 vs 13; P < .001).11 Additionally, the size of the abdominal aorta at the time of survey was not addressed in the study, which could constitute explanatory variables.
Conclusions
This study found higher QoL at 12-month follow-up compared to baseline in both the GH and BP domains of the SF-12v2 health survey for male veterans with an AAA. Periodic QoL assessments for patients with an AAA may be helpful in tracking QoL course, minimizing their physical and psychological concerns, and improving overall care and support. However, further research is necessary to assess the QoL of patients with an AAA who are under surveillance compared with those who had an aneurysm repair to accurately measure the impact of an AAA on QoL.
- Altobelli E, Rapacchietta L, Profeta VF, et al. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in population- based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2805. doi:10.3390/ijerph15122805
- Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2-77.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044
- Kent KC. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2101-2108. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1401430
- Harthun NL. Current issues in the treatment of women with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Gend Med. 2008;5:36-43.
- Aoki H. Taking control of the time bomb in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Circ J. 2016;80:314-315. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1350
- Damhus CS, Siersma V, Hansson A, Bang CW, Brodersen J. Psychosocial consequences of screeningdetected abdominal aortic aneurisms: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021;39:459-465. doi:10.1080/02813432.2021.2004713
- Ericsson A, Kumlien C, Ching S, Carlson E, Molassiotis A. Impact on quality of life of men with screening-detected abdominal aortic aneurysms attending regular follow ups: a narrative literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:589-596. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.012
- Galyfos G, Voulalas G, Stamatatos I, et al. Small abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we wait? Vasc Dis Manag. 2015;12:E152-E159.
- Kristensen KL, Dahl M, Rasmussen LM, et al. Glycated hemoglobin is associated with the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:730-736. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308874
- Xiao-Yan L, Yu-Kui M, Li-Hui L. Risk factors for preoperative anxiety and depression in patients scheduled for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Chine Med J. 2018;131:1951-1957. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.238154
- Suckow BD, Schanzer AS, Hoel AW, et al. A novel quality of life instrument for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:809-815. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.01.018
- Flatz A, Casillas A, Stringhini S, et al. Association between education and quality of diabetes care in Switzerland. Int J Gen Med. 2015;8:87-92. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S77139
- Christensen AV, Bjorner JB, Ekholm O, et al. Increased risk of mortality and readmission associated with lower SF-12 scores in cardiac patients: Results from the national DenHeart study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020;19:330-338. doi:10.1177/1474515119885480
- Hamming JF, De Vries J. Measuring quality of life. Br J Surg. 2007;94:923-924. doi:10.1002/bjs.5948
- Urbach DR. Measuring quality of life after surgery. Surg Innov. 2005;12:161-165. doi:10.1177/ 155335060501200216
- Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Kosinski M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36® health survey in medicare managed care. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004;25:5.
- Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30:473-483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
- Takayoshi K, Mototsugu T, Tomohiro T, et al. Health-related quality of life prospectively evaluated by the 8-item short form after endovascular repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Heart Vessels. 2017;32:960- 968. doi:10.1007/s00380-017-0956-9
- Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, et al. Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke. 1999;30:1213-1217. doi:10.1161/01.str.30.6.1213
- Jenkinson C, Layte R. The development and testing of the UK SF-12. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:14-18. doi:10.1177/135581969700200105
- Golledge J, Clancy P, Jamrozik K, et al. Obesity, adipokines, and abdominal aortic aneurysm: Health in Men study. Circulation. 2007;116:2275-2279. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.717926
- Norman PE, Curci JA. Understanding the effects of tobacco smoke on the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1473-1477. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300158
- Bath MF, Sidloff D, Saratzis A, et al. Impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on quality of life. BJS. 2018;105:203-208. doi:10.1002/bjs.10721
- Lesjak M, Boreland F, Lyle D, Sidford J, Flecknoe-Brown S, Fletcher J. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: does it affect men’s quality of life? Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18:284-288. doi:10.1071/PY11131
- Bath MF, Gokani VJ, Sidloff DA, et al. Systematic review of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular death in patients with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2015;102:866-872. doi:10.1002/bjs.9837
- Golledge J, Pinchbeck J, Rowbotham SE, et al. Health-related quality of life amongst people diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral artery disease and the effect of fenofibrate. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14583. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71454-4
- Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med. 1997;19:179- 186. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024606
- White MK, Maher SM, Rizio AA, et al. A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1757-1767. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1851-2
- Altobelli E, Rapacchietta L, Profeta VF, et al. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in population- based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2805. doi:10.3390/ijerph15122805
- Chaikof EL, Dalman RL, Eskandari MK, et al. The society for vascular surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2-77.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044
- Kent KC. Abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2101-2108. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1401430
- Harthun NL. Current issues in the treatment of women with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Gend Med. 2008;5:36-43.
- Aoki H. Taking control of the time bomb in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Circ J. 2016;80:314-315. doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-15-1350
- Damhus CS, Siersma V, Hansson A, Bang CW, Brodersen J. Psychosocial consequences of screeningdetected abdominal aortic aneurisms: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021;39:459-465. doi:10.1080/02813432.2021.2004713
- Ericsson A, Kumlien C, Ching S, Carlson E, Molassiotis A. Impact on quality of life of men with screening-detected abdominal aortic aneurysms attending regular follow ups: a narrative literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:589-596. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.012
- Galyfos G, Voulalas G, Stamatatos I, et al. Small abdominal aortic aneurysms: should we wait? Vasc Dis Manag. 2015;12:E152-E159.
- Kristensen KL, Dahl M, Rasmussen LM, et al. Glycated hemoglobin is associated with the growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:730-736. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308874
- Xiao-Yan L, Yu-Kui M, Li-Hui L. Risk factors for preoperative anxiety and depression in patients scheduled for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Chine Med J. 2018;131:1951-1957. doi:10.4103/0366-6999.238154
- Suckow BD, Schanzer AS, Hoel AW, et al. A novel quality of life instrument for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:809-815. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.01.018
- Flatz A, Casillas A, Stringhini S, et al. Association between education and quality of diabetes care in Switzerland. Int J Gen Med. 2015;8:87-92. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S77139
- Christensen AV, Bjorner JB, Ekholm O, et al. Increased risk of mortality and readmission associated with lower SF-12 scores in cardiac patients: Results from the national DenHeart study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020;19:330-338. doi:10.1177/1474515119885480
- Hamming JF, De Vries J. Measuring quality of life. Br J Surg. 2007;94:923-924. doi:10.1002/bjs.5948
- Urbach DR. Measuring quality of life after surgery. Surg Innov. 2005;12:161-165. doi:10.1177/ 155335060501200216
- Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Kosinski M, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36® health survey in medicare managed care. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004;25:5.
- Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care. 1992;30:473-483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
- Takayoshi K, Mototsugu T, Tomohiro T, et al. Health-related quality of life prospectively evaluated by the 8-item short form after endovascular repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Heart Vessels. 2017;32:960- 968. doi:10.1007/s00380-017-0956-9
- Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Penn A, et al. Replicability of SF-36 summary scores by the SF-12 in stroke patients. Stroke. 1999;30:1213-1217. doi:10.1161/01.str.30.6.1213
- Jenkinson C, Layte R. The development and testing of the UK SF-12. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:14-18. doi:10.1177/135581969700200105
- Golledge J, Clancy P, Jamrozik K, et al. Obesity, adipokines, and abdominal aortic aneurysm: Health in Men study. Circulation. 2007;116:2275-2279. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.717926
- Norman PE, Curci JA. Understanding the effects of tobacco smoke on the pathogenesis of aortic aneurysm. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1473-1477. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.112.300158
- Bath MF, Sidloff D, Saratzis A, et al. Impact of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on quality of life. BJS. 2018;105:203-208. doi:10.1002/bjs.10721
- Lesjak M, Boreland F, Lyle D, Sidford J, Flecknoe-Brown S, Fletcher J. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: does it affect men’s quality of life? Aust J Prim Health. 2012;18:284-288. doi:10.1071/PY11131
- Bath MF, Gokani VJ, Sidloff DA, et al. Systematic review of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular death in patients with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2015;102:866-872. doi:10.1002/bjs.9837
- Golledge J, Pinchbeck J, Rowbotham SE, et al. Health-related quality of life amongst people diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral artery disease and the effect of fenofibrate. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14583. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71454-4
- Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D. A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health Med. 1997;19:179- 186. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024606
- White MK, Maher SM, Rizio AA, et al. A meta-analytic review of measurement equivalence study findings of the SF-36® and SF-12® Health Surveys across electronic modes compared to paper administration. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1757-1767. doi:10.1007/s11136-018-1851-2
Quality of Life for Males With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Quality of Life for Males With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
VIP Boot Camp: Expanding the Impact of VA Primary Care Mental Health With a Transdiagnostic Modular Group Program
VIP Boot Camp: Expanding the Impact of VA Primary Care Mental Health With a Transdiagnostic Modular Group Program
Since 2007, Primary Care Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has improved access to mental health care services for veterans by directly embedding mental health care professionals (HCPs) within primary care teams.1 Veterans referred to PCMHI often have co-occurring physical and mental health disorders.2 Untreated chronic physical and mental comorbidities can diminish the effectiveness of medical and mental health interventions. Growing evidence suggests that treatment of mental health conditions can improve physical health outcomes and management of physical conditions can improve mental health outcomes.2,3
Chronic pain and sleep disorders are common reasons patients present to primary care, and often coexist together with mental health comorbidities.4 Sleep disorders affect 50% to 88% of patients with chronic pain, and 40% of patients with sleep disorders report chronic pain.4 Research has found that chronic pain and sleep disorders increase the risk of suicide attempts and deaths by suicide. Addressing suicide prevention simultaneously with treating chronic pain and insomnia is encouraged.5
Background
PCMHI treats physical and mental health comorbidities with a collaborative framework and a biopsychosocial integrative model.6 PCMHI staff provide mental health services as members of primary care teams. An interdisciplinary PCMHI team can include, but is not limited to, psychologists, mental health social workers, psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, clinical pharmacists, and mental health nurses. Quality of care within this model is elevated, as mental and physical health are recognized as interconnected. Collaboration between primary care and mental health benefits veterans and the VHA by increasing access to mental health care, decreasing stigma associated with mental health treatment, improving health outcomes, and enhancing the likelihood of recovery, resulting in high patient satisfaction.6-8
In the existing PCMHI model, HCPs are encouraged to use short-term, evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs).9 Veterans referred to PCMHI from primary care are typically able to attend 1 to 6 brief sessions of mental health treatment, often 20 to 30 minutes long. Most EBPs in PCMHI are disorder- specific, providing interventions focused on a single presenting problem (eg, insomnia, chronic pain, or posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]). For veterans with a single issue, this model can be very effective. 1,10 However, the high rate of co-occurrence of mental and physical health issues can make it difficult to fully treat interrelated problems if the focus is on 1 specific diagnosis. Veterans with a need for additional (more comprehensive or intensive) mental health treatment are frequently referred to a higher, more resource-intensive level of mental health care, either in the VHA or the community. Examples of higher levels of mental health care include the longer term behavioral health interdisciplinary program (BHIP), sometimes called a mental health clinic (MHC), or a specialty mental health program such as a PTSD clinic.
As PCMHI continues to grow, new challenges have emerged related to staffing shortages and gaps in the clinical delivery of mental health treatment within the VHA. At the same time, demand for VHA mental health treatment has increased. However, a mental health professional shortage severely limits the ability of the VHA to meet this demand. In many systems, this shortage may result in more referrals being made to a higher level of mental health care because of fewer resources to provide comprehensive treatment in a less intensive PCMHI setting.8,10,11 This referral pattern can overburden higher level care, often with long wait times for treatment and lengthy lag times between appointments. Furthermore, these gaps in the clinical delivery of care cannot be effectively addressed by hiring additional mental health professionals. This strain on resources can impede access to care and negatively affect outcomes.10
Recent congressional reports highlight these issues, noting that demand for mental health services continues to outpace the capacity of both PCMHI and higher levels of mental health care, leading to delays in treatment that may negatively affect outcomes.8,10,11 These delays can be particularly detrimental for individuals with conditions requiring timely intervention.8,11 Some veterans are willing to engage with PCMHI in a primary care setting but may be reluctant to engage in general mental health treatment. These veterans might not receive the mental health care they need without PCMHI.
Group Psychotherapy
A group psychotherapy format can address gaps in care delivery and provide advantages for patients, mental health professionals, and the VHA. Group psychotherapy aligns with the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 2018 Blueprint for Excellence and 2018 to 2024 strategic plan, underscoring the need for more timely and efficient mental health services.12,13
Benefits of group psychotherapy include reductions in symptoms, decreased feelings of isolation, increased social support, decreased emotional suppression, and enhanced satisfaction with overall quality of life.14-17 Studies of veterans with PTSD have found less attrition among those who chose group therapy compared with individual therapy.14,18 Group psychotherapy improves access to care by enabling delivery to more patients.14 When compared with individual therapy, the group format allows for a large number of patients to be treated simultaneously, maximizing resources and reducing costs.3,19-21
VISN 9 CRH Innovation
The VA provides care to veterans through regionally distinct administrative systems known as Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs). Clinical resource hubs (CRH) are VISN-based programs created to cover VA staffing shortages by virtually deploying HCPs into local VA systems until vacancies are filled. The national CRH vision of effectively using resources and innovative technologies to meet veterans’ health care needs, along with the above-referenced clinical gaps in the delivery of care, inspired the development of VIP Boot Camp within the VISN 9 CRH.22
Program Description
VIP Boot Camp is an evidence-informed group psychotherapy program designed to provide timely, brief, and comprehensive mental health treatment for veterans. VIP Boot Camp was developed to address the needs of veterans accessing PCMHI services who experience ≥ 1 of the often overlapping problems of anxiety/emotion regulation/stress, sleep difficulties, and chronic pain (Figure). VIP Boot Camp uses an integrative approach to highlight interconnections and similarities among these difficulties and their treatment. A primary vision of the program is to provide this comprehensive treatment within PCMHI (upstream) so additional referrals to higher levels of mental health care (downstream) may not be needed.

This design is intentional because it increases the number of individuals who can be treated upstream with comprehensive, preventive, and proactive care within PCMHI which, over time, frees up resources in the BHIP for individuals requiring higher levels of care. This approach also aligns with the importance of early treatment for chronic pain and sleep disturbances, which are linked to increased risk of suicide attempts and deaths by suicide for veterans.5 National interest for VIP Boot Camp grew during fiscal year 2024 after it received the Gold Medal Recognition for Most Adoptable and Greatest Potential for Impact during VHA National Access Sprint Wave 3—Mental Health Call of Champions.
History
VIP Boot Camp began in August 2021 at VISN 9 as a 6-week virtual group for veterans with chronic pain. It was established to assist a large VA medical center experiencing PCMHI staffing shortages and lacking available PCMHI groups. Many veterans in the chronic pain group discussed co-occurring issues such as sleep disturbances, anxiety, and stress. The CRH team considered launching 2 separate groups to address these additional PCMHI-level issues; however, in developing the group material which drew from multiple clinical approaches, the team recognized significant overlapping and interconnected themes.
The team discussed EBPs within the VHA and how certain interventions within these treatments could be helpful across many other co-occurring disorders. Integrated tactics (clinical interventions) were drawn from cognitive-behavioral therapy (for depression, insomnia, or chronic pain), acceptance and commitment therapy, prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, unified protocol, pain reprocessing therapy, emotional awareness and expression therapy, interpersonal neurobiology, and mindfulness. We collaborated with veterans during VIP Boot Camp groups to determine how to present and discuss complex interventions in ways that were clinically accurate, understandable, relatable, and relevant to their experiences.
To address accessibility issues, the chronic pain group was reduced to 4 weeks. A second 4-week module for anxiety, emotion regulation, and stress was developed, mirroring the tactics, language, and integrative approach of the revised chronic pain module. A similar integrative approach led to the development of the third and final 4-week module for sleep disturbances.
Current Program
The VIP Boot Camp consists of three 4-week integrated modules, each highlighting a critical area: sleep disturbances (Improving Sleep), chronic pain difficulties (Outsmarting Chronic Pain), and emotion regulation difficulties (Rewiring Your Brain). VIP Boot Camp is designed for veterans who are at the PCMHI level of care. Referrals are accepted for patients receiving treatment from primary care or PCMHI.
Guidelines for participation in VIP Boot Camp may differ across sites or VISNs. For example, a veteran who has been referred to the BHIP for medication management only or to a specialty MHC such as a pain clinic or PTSD clinic might also be appropriate and eligible for VIP Boot Camp.
Given the interconnectedness of foundational themes, elements, and practices across the VIP Boot Camp modules, the modules are offered in a rolling format with a veteran-centric “choose your own adventure” approach. Tactics are presented in the modules in a way that allows patients to begin with any 1 of the 3 modules and receive treatment that will help in the other areas. Participants choose their core module and initial treatment focus based on their values, needs, and goals. Individuals who complete a core module can end their VIP Boot Camp experience or continue to the next 4-week module for up to 3 modules.
The group is open to new individuals at the start of any 4-week module and closed for the remainder of its 4-week duration. This innovative rolling modular approach combines elements of open- and closed-group format, allowing for the flexibility and accessibility of an open group with the stability and peer support of a closed group.
Given the complicated and overlapping nature of chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, and sleep disturbances, VIP Boot Camp acknowledges that everything is interconnected and difficulties in 1 area may impact other areas. The 3 interconnected modules with repeating themes provide coherence and consistency. Veterans learn how interconnections across difficulties can be leveraged so that tactics learned and practiced in 1 area can assist in other areas, changing the cycle of suffering into a cycle of growth.
VIP Boot Camp sessions are 90 minutes long, once weekly for 4 weeks, with 2 mental health professionals trained to lead a dynamic group psychotherapy experience that aims to be fun for participants. VIP Boot Camp synthesizes evidence-based and evidence-informed interventions, as well as techniques from VHA complementary and integrative health programs, psychoeducation, and interpersonal interventions that model connection, playfulness, and healthy boundaries. These varied strategies combine to equip veterans with practical tactics for self-management outside of sessions, a process described as “finding puzzle pieces.” VIP Boot Camp is built on the idea that people are more likely to adopt and practice any tactic after being taught why that tactic is important, and how it fits into their larger interconnected puzzle. After each session, participants are provided with additional asynchronous educational material to help reinforce their learnings and practices.
Although individuals may hesitate to participate in a group setting, they often find the experience of community enhances and accelerates their treatment and gains. This involvement is highlighted in a core aspect of a VIP Boot Camp session called wins, during which participants learn how others on their Boot Camp team are implementing new skills and moving toward their personal values and objectives in a stepwise manner. Through these shared experiences, veterans discover how tactics working for others may serve as a model for their own personal objectives and plans for practice. The sense of relief described by many upon realizing they are not alone in their experiences, along with the satisfaction felt in discovering their ability to support others in Boot Camp, is described by many participants as deeply meaningful and in line with their personal values.
While developed as a fully virtual group program, VIP Boot Camp can also be conducted in person. The virtual program has been successful and continues to spread across VISN 9. There are 8 virtual VIP Boot Camps running in VISN 9, with plans for continued expansion. In the VISN 9 CRH, Boot Camps typically have 10 to 12 participants. Additionally, as VIP Boot Camp grows within a location there are frequently sufficient referrals to support a second rolling group, which enables staggering of the module offerings to allow for even more timely treatment.
Training Program
VISN 9 CRH also developed a VIP Boot Camp 3-day intensive training program for PCMHI HCPs that consists of learning and practicing VIP Boot Camp material for chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, sleep disturbances, mindfulness, and guided imagery, along with gaining experience as a VIP Boot Camp coleader. Feedback received from PCMHI HCPs who completed training has been positive. There is also a private Microsoft Teams channel for HCPs, which allows for resource sharing and community building among coleaders. More than 75 PCMHI HCPs have completed VIP Boot Camp training and > 25 VIP Boot Camps have been established at 4 additional VISNs.
The VISN 9 CRH VIP Boot Camp program initiated an implementation and effectiveness project with the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center. The focus of this collaboration is support for implementation and treatment effectiveness research with reports, articles, and a white paper on findings and best practices, alongside continued dissemination of the VIP Boot Camp program and training.
Conclusions
VIP Boot Camp is a PCMHI group program offering readily available, comprehensive, and integrative group psychotherapy services to veterans experiencing . 1 of the following: chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, and sleep disturbances. It was launched at the VISN 9 CRH with a goal of addressing clinical gaps in the delivery of mental health care, by increasing the number of patients treated within PCMHI. The VIP Boot Camp model provides veterans the opportunity to transform cycles of suffering into cycles of growth through a single approach that can address multiple presenting and interconnected issues.
A 3-day VIP Boot Camp training program provides a quick and effective path for a PCMHI program to train HCPs to launch a VIP Boot Camp. The VISN 9 CRH will continue to champion VIP Boot Camp as a model for the successful provision of comprehensive and integrative mental health treatment within PCMHI at the VA. Through readily available access to comprehensive mental health treatment in an environment that promotes participant empowerment and social engagement, VIP Boot Camp represents an integrative and innovative model of mental health treatment that offers benefits to veteran participants, HCPs, and the VHA.
- Leung LB, Yoon J, Escarce JJ, et al. Primary care-mental health integration in the VA: shifting mental health services for common mental illnesses to primary care. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69:403-409. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201700190
- Zhang A, Park S, Sullivan JE, et al. The effectiveness of problem-solving therapy for primary care patients’ depressive and/or anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31:139-150. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170270
- Hundt NE, Barrera TL, Robinson A, et al. A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in veterans. Mil Med. 2014;179:942-949. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-14-00128
- Jank R, Gallee A, Boeckle M, et al. Chronic pain and sleep disorders in primary care. Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:1-9. doi:10.1155/2017/9081802
- Ashrafioun L, Bishop TM, Pigeon WR. The relationship between pain severity, insomnia, and suicide attempts among a national veteran sample initiating pain care. Psychosom Med. 2021;83:733- 738. doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000975
- Ramanuj P, Ferenchik E, Docherty M, et al. Evolving models of integrated behavioral health and primary care. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:1. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-0985-4
- Post EP, Metzger M, Dumas P, et al. Integrating mental health into primary care within the Veterans Health Administration. Fam Syst Health. 2010;28:83-90. doi:10.1037/a0020130
- Smith TL, Kim B, Benzer JK, et al. FLOW: early results from a clinical demonstration project to improve the transition of patients with mental health disorders back to primary care. Psychol Serv. 2021;18:23-32. doi:10.1037/ser0000336
- Kearney LK, Post EP, Pomerantz AS, et al. Applying the interprofessional patient aligned care team in the department of veterans affairs transforming primary care. Am Psychol. 2014;69(4):399-408. doi:10.1037/a0035909
- US Government Accountability Office. Veterans health care: staffing challenges persist for fully integrating mental health and primary care services. December 15, 2022. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105372
- National Academies of Science and Engineering. Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services. National Academies Press; 2018. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24915/evaluation-of-the-department-of-veterans-affairs-mental-health-services
- US Department of Veterans Affairs. Blueprint for excellence: achieving veterans’ excellence. October 6, 2014. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.volunteer.va.gov/docs/blueprintforexcellence_factsheet.PDF
- US Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs FY 2018-2024 strategic plan. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.calvet.ca.gov/Regulations/USDVA%20Strategic%20Plan%202018-2024.pdf
- Sripada RK, Bohnert KM, Ganoczy D, et al. Initial group versus individual therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder and subsequent follow-up treatment adequacy. Psychol Serv. 2016;13:349-355. doi:10.1037/ser0000077
- Burnett-Zeigler IE, Pfeiffer P, Zivin K, et al. Psychotherapy utilization for acute depression within the Veterans Affairs health care system. Psychol Serv. 2012;9:325-335. doi:10.1037/a0027957
- Kim JS, Prins A, Hirschhorn EW, et al. Preliminary investigation into the effectiveness of group webSTAIR for trauma-exposed veterans in primary care. Mil Med. 2024;189:e1403-e1408. doi:10.1093/milmed/usae052
- Jakupcak M, Blais RK, Grossbard J, et al. “Toughness” in association with mental health symptoms among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans seeking Veterans Affairs health care. Psychol Men Masc. 2014;15:100-104. doi:10.1037/a0031508
- Stoycos SA, Berzenski SR, Beck JG, et al. Predictors of treatment completion in group psychotherapy for male veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 2023;36:346-358. doi:10.1002/jts.22915
- Possemato K. The current state of intervention research for posttraumatic stress disorder within the primary care setting. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011;18:268-280. doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9237-4
- Hunt MG, Rosenheck RA. Psychotherapy in mental health clinics of the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Clin Psychol. 2011;67:561-573. doi:10.1002/jclp.20788
- Khatri N, Marziali E, Tchernikov I, et al. Comparing telehealth-based and clinic-based group cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depression and anxiety: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:765. doi:10.2147/cia.s57832
- Dangel J. Clinical resource hub increases veterans' access to care. VA News. January 12, 2025. Accessed September 3, 2025. https://news.va.gov/137439/clinical-resource-hub-increases-access-to-care/
Since 2007, Primary Care Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has improved access to mental health care services for veterans by directly embedding mental health care professionals (HCPs) within primary care teams.1 Veterans referred to PCMHI often have co-occurring physical and mental health disorders.2 Untreated chronic physical and mental comorbidities can diminish the effectiveness of medical and mental health interventions. Growing evidence suggests that treatment of mental health conditions can improve physical health outcomes and management of physical conditions can improve mental health outcomes.2,3
Chronic pain and sleep disorders are common reasons patients present to primary care, and often coexist together with mental health comorbidities.4 Sleep disorders affect 50% to 88% of patients with chronic pain, and 40% of patients with sleep disorders report chronic pain.4 Research has found that chronic pain and sleep disorders increase the risk of suicide attempts and deaths by suicide. Addressing suicide prevention simultaneously with treating chronic pain and insomnia is encouraged.5
Background
PCMHI treats physical and mental health comorbidities with a collaborative framework and a biopsychosocial integrative model.6 PCMHI staff provide mental health services as members of primary care teams. An interdisciplinary PCMHI team can include, but is not limited to, psychologists, mental health social workers, psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, clinical pharmacists, and mental health nurses. Quality of care within this model is elevated, as mental and physical health are recognized as interconnected. Collaboration between primary care and mental health benefits veterans and the VHA by increasing access to mental health care, decreasing stigma associated with mental health treatment, improving health outcomes, and enhancing the likelihood of recovery, resulting in high patient satisfaction.6-8
In the existing PCMHI model, HCPs are encouraged to use short-term, evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs).9 Veterans referred to PCMHI from primary care are typically able to attend 1 to 6 brief sessions of mental health treatment, often 20 to 30 minutes long. Most EBPs in PCMHI are disorder- specific, providing interventions focused on a single presenting problem (eg, insomnia, chronic pain, or posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]). For veterans with a single issue, this model can be very effective. 1,10 However, the high rate of co-occurrence of mental and physical health issues can make it difficult to fully treat interrelated problems if the focus is on 1 specific diagnosis. Veterans with a need for additional (more comprehensive or intensive) mental health treatment are frequently referred to a higher, more resource-intensive level of mental health care, either in the VHA or the community. Examples of higher levels of mental health care include the longer term behavioral health interdisciplinary program (BHIP), sometimes called a mental health clinic (MHC), or a specialty mental health program such as a PTSD clinic.
As PCMHI continues to grow, new challenges have emerged related to staffing shortages and gaps in the clinical delivery of mental health treatment within the VHA. At the same time, demand for VHA mental health treatment has increased. However, a mental health professional shortage severely limits the ability of the VHA to meet this demand. In many systems, this shortage may result in more referrals being made to a higher level of mental health care because of fewer resources to provide comprehensive treatment in a less intensive PCMHI setting.8,10,11 This referral pattern can overburden higher level care, often with long wait times for treatment and lengthy lag times between appointments. Furthermore, these gaps in the clinical delivery of care cannot be effectively addressed by hiring additional mental health professionals. This strain on resources can impede access to care and negatively affect outcomes.10
Recent congressional reports highlight these issues, noting that demand for mental health services continues to outpace the capacity of both PCMHI and higher levels of mental health care, leading to delays in treatment that may negatively affect outcomes.8,10,11 These delays can be particularly detrimental for individuals with conditions requiring timely intervention.8,11 Some veterans are willing to engage with PCMHI in a primary care setting but may be reluctant to engage in general mental health treatment. These veterans might not receive the mental health care they need without PCMHI.
Group Psychotherapy
A group psychotherapy format can address gaps in care delivery and provide advantages for patients, mental health professionals, and the VHA. Group psychotherapy aligns with the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 2018 Blueprint for Excellence and 2018 to 2024 strategic plan, underscoring the need for more timely and efficient mental health services.12,13
Benefits of group psychotherapy include reductions in symptoms, decreased feelings of isolation, increased social support, decreased emotional suppression, and enhanced satisfaction with overall quality of life.14-17 Studies of veterans with PTSD have found less attrition among those who chose group therapy compared with individual therapy.14,18 Group psychotherapy improves access to care by enabling delivery to more patients.14 When compared with individual therapy, the group format allows for a large number of patients to be treated simultaneously, maximizing resources and reducing costs.3,19-21
VISN 9 CRH Innovation
The VA provides care to veterans through regionally distinct administrative systems known as Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs). Clinical resource hubs (CRH) are VISN-based programs created to cover VA staffing shortages by virtually deploying HCPs into local VA systems until vacancies are filled. The national CRH vision of effectively using resources and innovative technologies to meet veterans’ health care needs, along with the above-referenced clinical gaps in the delivery of care, inspired the development of VIP Boot Camp within the VISN 9 CRH.22
Program Description
VIP Boot Camp is an evidence-informed group psychotherapy program designed to provide timely, brief, and comprehensive mental health treatment for veterans. VIP Boot Camp was developed to address the needs of veterans accessing PCMHI services who experience ≥ 1 of the often overlapping problems of anxiety/emotion regulation/stress, sleep difficulties, and chronic pain (Figure). VIP Boot Camp uses an integrative approach to highlight interconnections and similarities among these difficulties and their treatment. A primary vision of the program is to provide this comprehensive treatment within PCMHI (upstream) so additional referrals to higher levels of mental health care (downstream) may not be needed.

This design is intentional because it increases the number of individuals who can be treated upstream with comprehensive, preventive, and proactive care within PCMHI which, over time, frees up resources in the BHIP for individuals requiring higher levels of care. This approach also aligns with the importance of early treatment for chronic pain and sleep disturbances, which are linked to increased risk of suicide attempts and deaths by suicide for veterans.5 National interest for VIP Boot Camp grew during fiscal year 2024 after it received the Gold Medal Recognition for Most Adoptable and Greatest Potential for Impact during VHA National Access Sprint Wave 3—Mental Health Call of Champions.
History
VIP Boot Camp began in August 2021 at VISN 9 as a 6-week virtual group for veterans with chronic pain. It was established to assist a large VA medical center experiencing PCMHI staffing shortages and lacking available PCMHI groups. Many veterans in the chronic pain group discussed co-occurring issues such as sleep disturbances, anxiety, and stress. The CRH team considered launching 2 separate groups to address these additional PCMHI-level issues; however, in developing the group material which drew from multiple clinical approaches, the team recognized significant overlapping and interconnected themes.
The team discussed EBPs within the VHA and how certain interventions within these treatments could be helpful across many other co-occurring disorders. Integrated tactics (clinical interventions) were drawn from cognitive-behavioral therapy (for depression, insomnia, or chronic pain), acceptance and commitment therapy, prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, unified protocol, pain reprocessing therapy, emotional awareness and expression therapy, interpersonal neurobiology, and mindfulness. We collaborated with veterans during VIP Boot Camp groups to determine how to present and discuss complex interventions in ways that were clinically accurate, understandable, relatable, and relevant to their experiences.
To address accessibility issues, the chronic pain group was reduced to 4 weeks. A second 4-week module for anxiety, emotion regulation, and stress was developed, mirroring the tactics, language, and integrative approach of the revised chronic pain module. A similar integrative approach led to the development of the third and final 4-week module for sleep disturbances.
Current Program
The VIP Boot Camp consists of three 4-week integrated modules, each highlighting a critical area: sleep disturbances (Improving Sleep), chronic pain difficulties (Outsmarting Chronic Pain), and emotion regulation difficulties (Rewiring Your Brain). VIP Boot Camp is designed for veterans who are at the PCMHI level of care. Referrals are accepted for patients receiving treatment from primary care or PCMHI.
Guidelines for participation in VIP Boot Camp may differ across sites or VISNs. For example, a veteran who has been referred to the BHIP for medication management only or to a specialty MHC such as a pain clinic or PTSD clinic might also be appropriate and eligible for VIP Boot Camp.
Given the interconnectedness of foundational themes, elements, and practices across the VIP Boot Camp modules, the modules are offered in a rolling format with a veteran-centric “choose your own adventure” approach. Tactics are presented in the modules in a way that allows patients to begin with any 1 of the 3 modules and receive treatment that will help in the other areas. Participants choose their core module and initial treatment focus based on their values, needs, and goals. Individuals who complete a core module can end their VIP Boot Camp experience or continue to the next 4-week module for up to 3 modules.
The group is open to new individuals at the start of any 4-week module and closed for the remainder of its 4-week duration. This innovative rolling modular approach combines elements of open- and closed-group format, allowing for the flexibility and accessibility of an open group with the stability and peer support of a closed group.
Given the complicated and overlapping nature of chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, and sleep disturbances, VIP Boot Camp acknowledges that everything is interconnected and difficulties in 1 area may impact other areas. The 3 interconnected modules with repeating themes provide coherence and consistency. Veterans learn how interconnections across difficulties can be leveraged so that tactics learned and practiced in 1 area can assist in other areas, changing the cycle of suffering into a cycle of growth.
VIP Boot Camp sessions are 90 minutes long, once weekly for 4 weeks, with 2 mental health professionals trained to lead a dynamic group psychotherapy experience that aims to be fun for participants. VIP Boot Camp synthesizes evidence-based and evidence-informed interventions, as well as techniques from VHA complementary and integrative health programs, psychoeducation, and interpersonal interventions that model connection, playfulness, and healthy boundaries. These varied strategies combine to equip veterans with practical tactics for self-management outside of sessions, a process described as “finding puzzle pieces.” VIP Boot Camp is built on the idea that people are more likely to adopt and practice any tactic after being taught why that tactic is important, and how it fits into their larger interconnected puzzle. After each session, participants are provided with additional asynchronous educational material to help reinforce their learnings and practices.
Although individuals may hesitate to participate in a group setting, they often find the experience of community enhances and accelerates their treatment and gains. This involvement is highlighted in a core aspect of a VIP Boot Camp session called wins, during which participants learn how others on their Boot Camp team are implementing new skills and moving toward their personal values and objectives in a stepwise manner. Through these shared experiences, veterans discover how tactics working for others may serve as a model for their own personal objectives and plans for practice. The sense of relief described by many upon realizing they are not alone in their experiences, along with the satisfaction felt in discovering their ability to support others in Boot Camp, is described by many participants as deeply meaningful and in line with their personal values.
While developed as a fully virtual group program, VIP Boot Camp can also be conducted in person. The virtual program has been successful and continues to spread across VISN 9. There are 8 virtual VIP Boot Camps running in VISN 9, with plans for continued expansion. In the VISN 9 CRH, Boot Camps typically have 10 to 12 participants. Additionally, as VIP Boot Camp grows within a location there are frequently sufficient referrals to support a second rolling group, which enables staggering of the module offerings to allow for even more timely treatment.
Training Program
VISN 9 CRH also developed a VIP Boot Camp 3-day intensive training program for PCMHI HCPs that consists of learning and practicing VIP Boot Camp material for chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, sleep disturbances, mindfulness, and guided imagery, along with gaining experience as a VIP Boot Camp coleader. Feedback received from PCMHI HCPs who completed training has been positive. There is also a private Microsoft Teams channel for HCPs, which allows for resource sharing and community building among coleaders. More than 75 PCMHI HCPs have completed VIP Boot Camp training and > 25 VIP Boot Camps have been established at 4 additional VISNs.
The VISN 9 CRH VIP Boot Camp program initiated an implementation and effectiveness project with the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center. The focus of this collaboration is support for implementation and treatment effectiveness research with reports, articles, and a white paper on findings and best practices, alongside continued dissemination of the VIP Boot Camp program and training.
Conclusions
VIP Boot Camp is a PCMHI group program offering readily available, comprehensive, and integrative group psychotherapy services to veterans experiencing . 1 of the following: chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, and sleep disturbances. It was launched at the VISN 9 CRH with a goal of addressing clinical gaps in the delivery of mental health care, by increasing the number of patients treated within PCMHI. The VIP Boot Camp model provides veterans the opportunity to transform cycles of suffering into cycles of growth through a single approach that can address multiple presenting and interconnected issues.
A 3-day VIP Boot Camp training program provides a quick and effective path for a PCMHI program to train HCPs to launch a VIP Boot Camp. The VISN 9 CRH will continue to champion VIP Boot Camp as a model for the successful provision of comprehensive and integrative mental health treatment within PCMHI at the VA. Through readily available access to comprehensive mental health treatment in an environment that promotes participant empowerment and social engagement, VIP Boot Camp represents an integrative and innovative model of mental health treatment that offers benefits to veteran participants, HCPs, and the VHA.
Since 2007, Primary Care Mental Health Integration (PCMHI) at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has improved access to mental health care services for veterans by directly embedding mental health care professionals (HCPs) within primary care teams.1 Veterans referred to PCMHI often have co-occurring physical and mental health disorders.2 Untreated chronic physical and mental comorbidities can diminish the effectiveness of medical and mental health interventions. Growing evidence suggests that treatment of mental health conditions can improve physical health outcomes and management of physical conditions can improve mental health outcomes.2,3
Chronic pain and sleep disorders are common reasons patients present to primary care, and often coexist together with mental health comorbidities.4 Sleep disorders affect 50% to 88% of patients with chronic pain, and 40% of patients with sleep disorders report chronic pain.4 Research has found that chronic pain and sleep disorders increase the risk of suicide attempts and deaths by suicide. Addressing suicide prevention simultaneously with treating chronic pain and insomnia is encouraged.5
Background
PCMHI treats physical and mental health comorbidities with a collaborative framework and a biopsychosocial integrative model.6 PCMHI staff provide mental health services as members of primary care teams. An interdisciplinary PCMHI team can include, but is not limited to, psychologists, mental health social workers, psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, clinical pharmacists, and mental health nurses. Quality of care within this model is elevated, as mental and physical health are recognized as interconnected. Collaboration between primary care and mental health benefits veterans and the VHA by increasing access to mental health care, decreasing stigma associated with mental health treatment, improving health outcomes, and enhancing the likelihood of recovery, resulting in high patient satisfaction.6-8
In the existing PCMHI model, HCPs are encouraged to use short-term, evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs).9 Veterans referred to PCMHI from primary care are typically able to attend 1 to 6 brief sessions of mental health treatment, often 20 to 30 minutes long. Most EBPs in PCMHI are disorder- specific, providing interventions focused on a single presenting problem (eg, insomnia, chronic pain, or posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]). For veterans with a single issue, this model can be very effective. 1,10 However, the high rate of co-occurrence of mental and physical health issues can make it difficult to fully treat interrelated problems if the focus is on 1 specific diagnosis. Veterans with a need for additional (more comprehensive or intensive) mental health treatment are frequently referred to a higher, more resource-intensive level of mental health care, either in the VHA or the community. Examples of higher levels of mental health care include the longer term behavioral health interdisciplinary program (BHIP), sometimes called a mental health clinic (MHC), or a specialty mental health program such as a PTSD clinic.
As PCMHI continues to grow, new challenges have emerged related to staffing shortages and gaps in the clinical delivery of mental health treatment within the VHA. At the same time, demand for VHA mental health treatment has increased. However, a mental health professional shortage severely limits the ability of the VHA to meet this demand. In many systems, this shortage may result in more referrals being made to a higher level of mental health care because of fewer resources to provide comprehensive treatment in a less intensive PCMHI setting.8,10,11 This referral pattern can overburden higher level care, often with long wait times for treatment and lengthy lag times between appointments. Furthermore, these gaps in the clinical delivery of care cannot be effectively addressed by hiring additional mental health professionals. This strain on resources can impede access to care and negatively affect outcomes.10
Recent congressional reports highlight these issues, noting that demand for mental health services continues to outpace the capacity of both PCMHI and higher levels of mental health care, leading to delays in treatment that may negatively affect outcomes.8,10,11 These delays can be particularly detrimental for individuals with conditions requiring timely intervention.8,11 Some veterans are willing to engage with PCMHI in a primary care setting but may be reluctant to engage in general mental health treatment. These veterans might not receive the mental health care they need without PCMHI.
Group Psychotherapy
A group psychotherapy format can address gaps in care delivery and provide advantages for patients, mental health professionals, and the VHA. Group psychotherapy aligns with the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 2018 Blueprint for Excellence and 2018 to 2024 strategic plan, underscoring the need for more timely and efficient mental health services.12,13
Benefits of group psychotherapy include reductions in symptoms, decreased feelings of isolation, increased social support, decreased emotional suppression, and enhanced satisfaction with overall quality of life.14-17 Studies of veterans with PTSD have found less attrition among those who chose group therapy compared with individual therapy.14,18 Group psychotherapy improves access to care by enabling delivery to more patients.14 When compared with individual therapy, the group format allows for a large number of patients to be treated simultaneously, maximizing resources and reducing costs.3,19-21
VISN 9 CRH Innovation
The VA provides care to veterans through regionally distinct administrative systems known as Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs). Clinical resource hubs (CRH) are VISN-based programs created to cover VA staffing shortages by virtually deploying HCPs into local VA systems until vacancies are filled. The national CRH vision of effectively using resources and innovative technologies to meet veterans’ health care needs, along with the above-referenced clinical gaps in the delivery of care, inspired the development of VIP Boot Camp within the VISN 9 CRH.22
Program Description
VIP Boot Camp is an evidence-informed group psychotherapy program designed to provide timely, brief, and comprehensive mental health treatment for veterans. VIP Boot Camp was developed to address the needs of veterans accessing PCMHI services who experience ≥ 1 of the often overlapping problems of anxiety/emotion regulation/stress, sleep difficulties, and chronic pain (Figure). VIP Boot Camp uses an integrative approach to highlight interconnections and similarities among these difficulties and their treatment. A primary vision of the program is to provide this comprehensive treatment within PCMHI (upstream) so additional referrals to higher levels of mental health care (downstream) may not be needed.

This design is intentional because it increases the number of individuals who can be treated upstream with comprehensive, preventive, and proactive care within PCMHI which, over time, frees up resources in the BHIP for individuals requiring higher levels of care. This approach also aligns with the importance of early treatment for chronic pain and sleep disturbances, which are linked to increased risk of suicide attempts and deaths by suicide for veterans.5 National interest for VIP Boot Camp grew during fiscal year 2024 after it received the Gold Medal Recognition for Most Adoptable and Greatest Potential for Impact during VHA National Access Sprint Wave 3—Mental Health Call of Champions.
History
VIP Boot Camp began in August 2021 at VISN 9 as a 6-week virtual group for veterans with chronic pain. It was established to assist a large VA medical center experiencing PCMHI staffing shortages and lacking available PCMHI groups. Many veterans in the chronic pain group discussed co-occurring issues such as sleep disturbances, anxiety, and stress. The CRH team considered launching 2 separate groups to address these additional PCMHI-level issues; however, in developing the group material which drew from multiple clinical approaches, the team recognized significant overlapping and interconnected themes.
The team discussed EBPs within the VHA and how certain interventions within these treatments could be helpful across many other co-occurring disorders. Integrated tactics (clinical interventions) were drawn from cognitive-behavioral therapy (for depression, insomnia, or chronic pain), acceptance and commitment therapy, prolonged exposure, cognitive processing therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, unified protocol, pain reprocessing therapy, emotional awareness and expression therapy, interpersonal neurobiology, and mindfulness. We collaborated with veterans during VIP Boot Camp groups to determine how to present and discuss complex interventions in ways that were clinically accurate, understandable, relatable, and relevant to their experiences.
To address accessibility issues, the chronic pain group was reduced to 4 weeks. A second 4-week module for anxiety, emotion regulation, and stress was developed, mirroring the tactics, language, and integrative approach of the revised chronic pain module. A similar integrative approach led to the development of the third and final 4-week module for sleep disturbances.
Current Program
The VIP Boot Camp consists of three 4-week integrated modules, each highlighting a critical area: sleep disturbances (Improving Sleep), chronic pain difficulties (Outsmarting Chronic Pain), and emotion regulation difficulties (Rewiring Your Brain). VIP Boot Camp is designed for veterans who are at the PCMHI level of care. Referrals are accepted for patients receiving treatment from primary care or PCMHI.
Guidelines for participation in VIP Boot Camp may differ across sites or VISNs. For example, a veteran who has been referred to the BHIP for medication management only or to a specialty MHC such as a pain clinic or PTSD clinic might also be appropriate and eligible for VIP Boot Camp.
Given the interconnectedness of foundational themes, elements, and practices across the VIP Boot Camp modules, the modules are offered in a rolling format with a veteran-centric “choose your own adventure” approach. Tactics are presented in the modules in a way that allows patients to begin with any 1 of the 3 modules and receive treatment that will help in the other areas. Participants choose their core module and initial treatment focus based on their values, needs, and goals. Individuals who complete a core module can end their VIP Boot Camp experience or continue to the next 4-week module for up to 3 modules.
The group is open to new individuals at the start of any 4-week module and closed for the remainder of its 4-week duration. This innovative rolling modular approach combines elements of open- and closed-group format, allowing for the flexibility and accessibility of an open group with the stability and peer support of a closed group.
Given the complicated and overlapping nature of chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, and sleep disturbances, VIP Boot Camp acknowledges that everything is interconnected and difficulties in 1 area may impact other areas. The 3 interconnected modules with repeating themes provide coherence and consistency. Veterans learn how interconnections across difficulties can be leveraged so that tactics learned and practiced in 1 area can assist in other areas, changing the cycle of suffering into a cycle of growth.
VIP Boot Camp sessions are 90 minutes long, once weekly for 4 weeks, with 2 mental health professionals trained to lead a dynamic group psychotherapy experience that aims to be fun for participants. VIP Boot Camp synthesizes evidence-based and evidence-informed interventions, as well as techniques from VHA complementary and integrative health programs, psychoeducation, and interpersonal interventions that model connection, playfulness, and healthy boundaries. These varied strategies combine to equip veterans with practical tactics for self-management outside of sessions, a process described as “finding puzzle pieces.” VIP Boot Camp is built on the idea that people are more likely to adopt and practice any tactic after being taught why that tactic is important, and how it fits into their larger interconnected puzzle. After each session, participants are provided with additional asynchronous educational material to help reinforce their learnings and practices.
Although individuals may hesitate to participate in a group setting, they often find the experience of community enhances and accelerates their treatment and gains. This involvement is highlighted in a core aspect of a VIP Boot Camp session called wins, during which participants learn how others on their Boot Camp team are implementing new skills and moving toward their personal values and objectives in a stepwise manner. Through these shared experiences, veterans discover how tactics working for others may serve as a model for their own personal objectives and plans for practice. The sense of relief described by many upon realizing they are not alone in their experiences, along with the satisfaction felt in discovering their ability to support others in Boot Camp, is described by many participants as deeply meaningful and in line with their personal values.
While developed as a fully virtual group program, VIP Boot Camp can also be conducted in person. The virtual program has been successful and continues to spread across VISN 9. There are 8 virtual VIP Boot Camps running in VISN 9, with plans for continued expansion. In the VISN 9 CRH, Boot Camps typically have 10 to 12 participants. Additionally, as VIP Boot Camp grows within a location there are frequently sufficient referrals to support a second rolling group, which enables staggering of the module offerings to allow for even more timely treatment.
Training Program
VISN 9 CRH also developed a VIP Boot Camp 3-day intensive training program for PCMHI HCPs that consists of learning and practicing VIP Boot Camp material for chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, sleep disturbances, mindfulness, and guided imagery, along with gaining experience as a VIP Boot Camp coleader. Feedback received from PCMHI HCPs who completed training has been positive. There is also a private Microsoft Teams channel for HCPs, which allows for resource sharing and community building among coleaders. More than 75 PCMHI HCPs have completed VIP Boot Camp training and > 25 VIP Boot Camps have been established at 4 additional VISNs.
The VISN 9 CRH VIP Boot Camp program initiated an implementation and effectiveness project with the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and the South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center. The focus of this collaboration is support for implementation and treatment effectiveness research with reports, articles, and a white paper on findings and best practices, alongside continued dissemination of the VIP Boot Camp program and training.
Conclusions
VIP Boot Camp is a PCMHI group program offering readily available, comprehensive, and integrative group psychotherapy services to veterans experiencing . 1 of the following: chronic pain, emotion regulation/ stress, and sleep disturbances. It was launched at the VISN 9 CRH with a goal of addressing clinical gaps in the delivery of mental health care, by increasing the number of patients treated within PCMHI. The VIP Boot Camp model provides veterans the opportunity to transform cycles of suffering into cycles of growth through a single approach that can address multiple presenting and interconnected issues.
A 3-day VIP Boot Camp training program provides a quick and effective path for a PCMHI program to train HCPs to launch a VIP Boot Camp. The VISN 9 CRH will continue to champion VIP Boot Camp as a model for the successful provision of comprehensive and integrative mental health treatment within PCMHI at the VA. Through readily available access to comprehensive mental health treatment in an environment that promotes participant empowerment and social engagement, VIP Boot Camp represents an integrative and innovative model of mental health treatment that offers benefits to veteran participants, HCPs, and the VHA.
- Leung LB, Yoon J, Escarce JJ, et al. Primary care-mental health integration in the VA: shifting mental health services for common mental illnesses to primary care. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69:403-409. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201700190
- Zhang A, Park S, Sullivan JE, et al. The effectiveness of problem-solving therapy for primary care patients’ depressive and/or anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31:139-150. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170270
- Hundt NE, Barrera TL, Robinson A, et al. A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in veterans. Mil Med. 2014;179:942-949. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-14-00128
- Jank R, Gallee A, Boeckle M, et al. Chronic pain and sleep disorders in primary care. Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:1-9. doi:10.1155/2017/9081802
- Ashrafioun L, Bishop TM, Pigeon WR. The relationship between pain severity, insomnia, and suicide attempts among a national veteran sample initiating pain care. Psychosom Med. 2021;83:733- 738. doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000975
- Ramanuj P, Ferenchik E, Docherty M, et al. Evolving models of integrated behavioral health and primary care. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:1. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-0985-4
- Post EP, Metzger M, Dumas P, et al. Integrating mental health into primary care within the Veterans Health Administration. Fam Syst Health. 2010;28:83-90. doi:10.1037/a0020130
- Smith TL, Kim B, Benzer JK, et al. FLOW: early results from a clinical demonstration project to improve the transition of patients with mental health disorders back to primary care. Psychol Serv. 2021;18:23-32. doi:10.1037/ser0000336
- Kearney LK, Post EP, Pomerantz AS, et al. Applying the interprofessional patient aligned care team in the department of veterans affairs transforming primary care. Am Psychol. 2014;69(4):399-408. doi:10.1037/a0035909
- US Government Accountability Office. Veterans health care: staffing challenges persist for fully integrating mental health and primary care services. December 15, 2022. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105372
- National Academies of Science and Engineering. Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services. National Academies Press; 2018. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24915/evaluation-of-the-department-of-veterans-affairs-mental-health-services
- US Department of Veterans Affairs. Blueprint for excellence: achieving veterans’ excellence. October 6, 2014. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.volunteer.va.gov/docs/blueprintforexcellence_factsheet.PDF
- US Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs FY 2018-2024 strategic plan. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.calvet.ca.gov/Regulations/USDVA%20Strategic%20Plan%202018-2024.pdf
- Sripada RK, Bohnert KM, Ganoczy D, et al. Initial group versus individual therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder and subsequent follow-up treatment adequacy. Psychol Serv. 2016;13:349-355. doi:10.1037/ser0000077
- Burnett-Zeigler IE, Pfeiffer P, Zivin K, et al. Psychotherapy utilization for acute depression within the Veterans Affairs health care system. Psychol Serv. 2012;9:325-335. doi:10.1037/a0027957
- Kim JS, Prins A, Hirschhorn EW, et al. Preliminary investigation into the effectiveness of group webSTAIR for trauma-exposed veterans in primary care. Mil Med. 2024;189:e1403-e1408. doi:10.1093/milmed/usae052
- Jakupcak M, Blais RK, Grossbard J, et al. “Toughness” in association with mental health symptoms among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans seeking Veterans Affairs health care. Psychol Men Masc. 2014;15:100-104. doi:10.1037/a0031508
- Stoycos SA, Berzenski SR, Beck JG, et al. Predictors of treatment completion in group psychotherapy for male veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 2023;36:346-358. doi:10.1002/jts.22915
- Possemato K. The current state of intervention research for posttraumatic stress disorder within the primary care setting. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011;18:268-280. doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9237-4
- Hunt MG, Rosenheck RA. Psychotherapy in mental health clinics of the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Clin Psychol. 2011;67:561-573. doi:10.1002/jclp.20788
- Khatri N, Marziali E, Tchernikov I, et al. Comparing telehealth-based and clinic-based group cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depression and anxiety: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:765. doi:10.2147/cia.s57832
- Dangel J. Clinical resource hub increases veterans' access to care. VA News. January 12, 2025. Accessed September 3, 2025. https://news.va.gov/137439/clinical-resource-hub-increases-access-to-care/
- Leung LB, Yoon J, Escarce JJ, et al. Primary care-mental health integration in the VA: shifting mental health services for common mental illnesses to primary care. Psychiatr Serv. 2018;69:403-409. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201700190
- Zhang A, Park S, Sullivan JE, et al. The effectiveness of problem-solving therapy for primary care patients’ depressive and/or anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31:139-150. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170270
- Hundt NE, Barrera TL, Robinson A, et al. A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in veterans. Mil Med. 2014;179:942-949. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-14-00128
- Jank R, Gallee A, Boeckle M, et al. Chronic pain and sleep disorders in primary care. Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:1-9. doi:10.1155/2017/9081802
- Ashrafioun L, Bishop TM, Pigeon WR. The relationship between pain severity, insomnia, and suicide attempts among a national veteran sample initiating pain care. Psychosom Med. 2021;83:733- 738. doi:10.1097/psy.0000000000000975
- Ramanuj P, Ferenchik E, Docherty M, et al. Evolving models of integrated behavioral health and primary care. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:1. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-0985-4
- Post EP, Metzger M, Dumas P, et al. Integrating mental health into primary care within the Veterans Health Administration. Fam Syst Health. 2010;28:83-90. doi:10.1037/a0020130
- Smith TL, Kim B, Benzer JK, et al. FLOW: early results from a clinical demonstration project to improve the transition of patients with mental health disorders back to primary care. Psychol Serv. 2021;18:23-32. doi:10.1037/ser0000336
- Kearney LK, Post EP, Pomerantz AS, et al. Applying the interprofessional patient aligned care team in the department of veterans affairs transforming primary care. Am Psychol. 2014;69(4):399-408. doi:10.1037/a0035909
- US Government Accountability Office. Veterans health care: staffing challenges persist for fully integrating mental health and primary care services. December 15, 2022. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105372
- National Academies of Science and Engineering. Evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services. National Academies Press; 2018. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/24915/evaluation-of-the-department-of-veterans-affairs-mental-health-services
- US Department of Veterans Affairs. Blueprint for excellence: achieving veterans’ excellence. October 6, 2014. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.volunteer.va.gov/docs/blueprintforexcellence_factsheet.PDF
- US Department of Veterans Affairs. Department of Veterans Affairs FY 2018-2024 strategic plan. Accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.calvet.ca.gov/Regulations/USDVA%20Strategic%20Plan%202018-2024.pdf
- Sripada RK, Bohnert KM, Ganoczy D, et al. Initial group versus individual therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder and subsequent follow-up treatment adequacy. Psychol Serv. 2016;13:349-355. doi:10.1037/ser0000077
- Burnett-Zeigler IE, Pfeiffer P, Zivin K, et al. Psychotherapy utilization for acute depression within the Veterans Affairs health care system. Psychol Serv. 2012;9:325-335. doi:10.1037/a0027957
- Kim JS, Prins A, Hirschhorn EW, et al. Preliminary investigation into the effectiveness of group webSTAIR for trauma-exposed veterans in primary care. Mil Med. 2024;189:e1403-e1408. doi:10.1093/milmed/usae052
- Jakupcak M, Blais RK, Grossbard J, et al. “Toughness” in association with mental health symptoms among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans seeking Veterans Affairs health care. Psychol Men Masc. 2014;15:100-104. doi:10.1037/a0031508
- Stoycos SA, Berzenski SR, Beck JG, et al. Predictors of treatment completion in group psychotherapy for male veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 2023;36:346-358. doi:10.1002/jts.22915
- Possemato K. The current state of intervention research for posttraumatic stress disorder within the primary care setting. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011;18:268-280. doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9237-4
- Hunt MG, Rosenheck RA. Psychotherapy in mental health clinics of the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Clin Psychol. 2011;67:561-573. doi:10.1002/jclp.20788
- Khatri N, Marziali E, Tchernikov I, et al. Comparing telehealth-based and clinic-based group cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depression and anxiety: a pilot study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:765. doi:10.2147/cia.s57832
- Dangel J. Clinical resource hub increases veterans' access to care. VA News. January 12, 2025. Accessed September 3, 2025. https://news.va.gov/137439/clinical-resource-hub-increases-access-to-care/
VIP Boot Camp: Expanding the Impact of VA Primary Care Mental Health With a Transdiagnostic Modular Group Program
VIP Boot Camp: Expanding the Impact of VA Primary Care Mental Health With a Transdiagnostic Modular Group Program
Painful Edematous Labial Erosions
Painful Edematous Labial Erosions
THE DIAGNOSIS: Kaposi Varicelliform Eruption
Genital erosions tested positive for herpes simplex virus (HSV) 2 via PCR, confirming a Kaposi varicelliform eruption (KVE) in a patient with mycosis fungoides. The medical team began antiviral therapy with intravenous (IV) acyclovir; however, susceptibility testing during the hospital admission confirmed acyclovir resistance, requiring a transition to cidofovir cream 1% and IV foscarnet.1 Subsequent concerns by the care team about chemical burns, dysuria, and renal impairment led to discontinuation of both the cidofovir and foscarnet, considerably narrowing the treatment options.1 The patient’s condition was complicated by polymicrobial bacteremia. Additionally, worsening acidosis and acute kidney injury required initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy.1 Considering these conditions, the patient was enrolled in a promising clinical trial for pritelivir, a novel antiviral medication; however, due to the development of oliguria and the progression of renal failure, this course of treatment had to be discontinued. Faced with potential viral encephalitis, the infectious disease team concluded that, despite previous adverse reactions, resumption of IV foscarnet treatment would present more benefits than risks, given the patient’s critical situation.1
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a slowly progressive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma of CD4+ cells that primarily affects the skin. Clinically, it often is characterized by pruritic scaly patches or plaques with sharply demarcated borders, the enduring nature of which consistently poses a therapeutic challenge due to their noted resistance to preliminary lines of treatment. Presently, potential cures are limited to allogeneic stem cell transplantation and unilesional radiotherapy for advanced MF; however, no treatment has been found to notably improve survival rates.1 Mycosis fungoides can result in various complications including diffuse spread of a skin infection caused by HSV, known as KVE.1 Kaposi varicelliform eruption usually manifests clinically with painful skin vesicles that often are accompanied by systemic signs such as fever and malaise. The vesicles rapidly progress into pustules or erosions, predominantly affecting regions such as the head, neck, groin, and upper torso (Figure 1).2 Kaposi varicelliform eruption is considered a dermatologic emergency due to its potential to precipitate serious complications such as life-threatening secondary bacterial infection, HSV viremia, and multiorgan involvement; it also carries the risk of instigating ocular complications, such as keratitis, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, uveitis, and potential vision loss.2

Kaposi varicelliform eruption usually is diagnosed through clinical examination supported by polymerase chain reaction, viral culture, histopathology, HSV serology, and Tzanck smear.2 The differential diagnosis includes varicella, atypical varicella, herpes genitalis, herpes zoster, allergic or irritant contact dermatitis, or MF, which may result in painful skin ulcers.2-4 If an HSV superinfection is suspected, a polymerase chain reaction test ideally should be conducted within the first 72 hours of symptom onset.2 Herpes simplex virus infection may be reinforced by histologic features such as intraepidermal blistering, acantholysis, keratinocyte ballooning degeneration, and multinuclear giant cells with intranuclear inclusions. Given its severe nature, immediate empiric antiviral treatment for KVE is essential, even while awaiting confirmatory tests. The recommended treatment protocol involves acyclovir (400 mg orally 3 times daily or 10 mg/kg IV) or valacyclovir (500 mg orally twice daily), continued until KVE resolves.2
Herpes genitalis caused by HSV-2 is estimated to affect approximately 45 million adults in the United States.2 First-line treatment for HSV-2 includes acyclovir and its derivatives, which are viral nucleoside analogs that inhibit viral DNA polymerases.5,6 However, over the past 2 decades, increasing HSV resistance to acyclovir and its derivatives has been noted among immunocompromised patients.5,6 Second-line agents, such as IV foscarnet and cidofovir, require close laboratory monitoring for nephrotoxicity and are contraindicated in those with renal insufficiency, thus limiting their use.5 To combat acyclovir resistance, novel antivirals such as pritelivir are being developed. Pritelivir targets the HSV helicase-primase complex and has been shown to outperform acyclovir in in-vitro animal models.7 Due to its unique mechanism of action (Figure 2), pritelivir is effective against acyclovir-resistant HSV strains, and clinical trials suggest its serum half-life may allow for daily dosing. A phase 2 study showed pritelivir reduced viral shedding days, sped up genital lesion healing in adults infected with HSV-2, and exhibited a good safety profile.7 Our patient participated in ongoing open-label trials of pritelivir that aimed to assess its efficacy and safety in immunocompromised patients. Given the limited alternative treatments for acyclovir-resistant HSV-2, clinicians need to stay updated on antiviral agents under development.

- García-Díaz N, Piris MÁ, Ortiz-Romero PL, et al. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: an integrative review of the pathophysiology, molecular drivers, and targeted therapy. Cancers. 2021;13:1931. doi:10.3390/cancers13081931
- Baaniya B, Agrawal S. Kaposi varicelliform eruption in a patient with pemphigus vulgaris: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2020;2020:6695342. doi:10.1155/2020/6695342
- Shin D, Lee MS, Kim DY, et al. Increased large unstained cells value in varicella patients: a valuable parameter to aid rapid diagnosis of varicella infection. J Dermatol. 2015;42:795-799. doi:10.1111
- Joshi A, Sah SP, Agrawal S. Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption or atypical chickenpox in a normal individual. Australas J Dermatol. 2000;41:126-127.
- Groves MJ. Genital herpes: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2016; 93:928-934.
- Fleming DT, Leone P, Esposito D, et al. Herpes virus type 2 infection and genital symptoms in primary care patients. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:416-421. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000200578.86276.0b
- Poole CL, James SH. Antiviral therapies for herpesviruses: current agents and new directions. Clin Ther. 2018;40:1282-1298. doi:10.1016 /j.clinthera.2018.07.006.
THE DIAGNOSIS: Kaposi Varicelliform Eruption
Genital erosions tested positive for herpes simplex virus (HSV) 2 via PCR, confirming a Kaposi varicelliform eruption (KVE) in a patient with mycosis fungoides. The medical team began antiviral therapy with intravenous (IV) acyclovir; however, susceptibility testing during the hospital admission confirmed acyclovir resistance, requiring a transition to cidofovir cream 1% and IV foscarnet.1 Subsequent concerns by the care team about chemical burns, dysuria, and renal impairment led to discontinuation of both the cidofovir and foscarnet, considerably narrowing the treatment options.1 The patient’s condition was complicated by polymicrobial bacteremia. Additionally, worsening acidosis and acute kidney injury required initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy.1 Considering these conditions, the patient was enrolled in a promising clinical trial for pritelivir, a novel antiviral medication; however, due to the development of oliguria and the progression of renal failure, this course of treatment had to be discontinued. Faced with potential viral encephalitis, the infectious disease team concluded that, despite previous adverse reactions, resumption of IV foscarnet treatment would present more benefits than risks, given the patient’s critical situation.1
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a slowly progressive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma of CD4+ cells that primarily affects the skin. Clinically, it often is characterized by pruritic scaly patches or plaques with sharply demarcated borders, the enduring nature of which consistently poses a therapeutic challenge due to their noted resistance to preliminary lines of treatment. Presently, potential cures are limited to allogeneic stem cell transplantation and unilesional radiotherapy for advanced MF; however, no treatment has been found to notably improve survival rates.1 Mycosis fungoides can result in various complications including diffuse spread of a skin infection caused by HSV, known as KVE.1 Kaposi varicelliform eruption usually manifests clinically with painful skin vesicles that often are accompanied by systemic signs such as fever and malaise. The vesicles rapidly progress into pustules or erosions, predominantly affecting regions such as the head, neck, groin, and upper torso (Figure 1).2 Kaposi varicelliform eruption is considered a dermatologic emergency due to its potential to precipitate serious complications such as life-threatening secondary bacterial infection, HSV viremia, and multiorgan involvement; it also carries the risk of instigating ocular complications, such as keratitis, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, uveitis, and potential vision loss.2

Kaposi varicelliform eruption usually is diagnosed through clinical examination supported by polymerase chain reaction, viral culture, histopathology, HSV serology, and Tzanck smear.2 The differential diagnosis includes varicella, atypical varicella, herpes genitalis, herpes zoster, allergic or irritant contact dermatitis, or MF, which may result in painful skin ulcers.2-4 If an HSV superinfection is suspected, a polymerase chain reaction test ideally should be conducted within the first 72 hours of symptom onset.2 Herpes simplex virus infection may be reinforced by histologic features such as intraepidermal blistering, acantholysis, keratinocyte ballooning degeneration, and multinuclear giant cells with intranuclear inclusions. Given its severe nature, immediate empiric antiviral treatment for KVE is essential, even while awaiting confirmatory tests. The recommended treatment protocol involves acyclovir (400 mg orally 3 times daily or 10 mg/kg IV) or valacyclovir (500 mg orally twice daily), continued until KVE resolves.2
Herpes genitalis caused by HSV-2 is estimated to affect approximately 45 million adults in the United States.2 First-line treatment for HSV-2 includes acyclovir and its derivatives, which are viral nucleoside analogs that inhibit viral DNA polymerases.5,6 However, over the past 2 decades, increasing HSV resistance to acyclovir and its derivatives has been noted among immunocompromised patients.5,6 Second-line agents, such as IV foscarnet and cidofovir, require close laboratory monitoring for nephrotoxicity and are contraindicated in those with renal insufficiency, thus limiting their use.5 To combat acyclovir resistance, novel antivirals such as pritelivir are being developed. Pritelivir targets the HSV helicase-primase complex and has been shown to outperform acyclovir in in-vitro animal models.7 Due to its unique mechanism of action (Figure 2), pritelivir is effective against acyclovir-resistant HSV strains, and clinical trials suggest its serum half-life may allow for daily dosing. A phase 2 study showed pritelivir reduced viral shedding days, sped up genital lesion healing in adults infected with HSV-2, and exhibited a good safety profile.7 Our patient participated in ongoing open-label trials of pritelivir that aimed to assess its efficacy and safety in immunocompromised patients. Given the limited alternative treatments for acyclovir-resistant HSV-2, clinicians need to stay updated on antiviral agents under development.

THE DIAGNOSIS: Kaposi Varicelliform Eruption
Genital erosions tested positive for herpes simplex virus (HSV) 2 via PCR, confirming a Kaposi varicelliform eruption (KVE) in a patient with mycosis fungoides. The medical team began antiviral therapy with intravenous (IV) acyclovir; however, susceptibility testing during the hospital admission confirmed acyclovir resistance, requiring a transition to cidofovir cream 1% and IV foscarnet.1 Subsequent concerns by the care team about chemical burns, dysuria, and renal impairment led to discontinuation of both the cidofovir and foscarnet, considerably narrowing the treatment options.1 The patient’s condition was complicated by polymicrobial bacteremia. Additionally, worsening acidosis and acute kidney injury required initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy.1 Considering these conditions, the patient was enrolled in a promising clinical trial for pritelivir, a novel antiviral medication; however, due to the development of oliguria and the progression of renal failure, this course of treatment had to be discontinued. Faced with potential viral encephalitis, the infectious disease team concluded that, despite previous adverse reactions, resumption of IV foscarnet treatment would present more benefits than risks, given the patient’s critical situation.1
Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a slowly progressive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma of CD4+ cells that primarily affects the skin. Clinically, it often is characterized by pruritic scaly patches or plaques with sharply demarcated borders, the enduring nature of which consistently poses a therapeutic challenge due to their noted resistance to preliminary lines of treatment. Presently, potential cures are limited to allogeneic stem cell transplantation and unilesional radiotherapy for advanced MF; however, no treatment has been found to notably improve survival rates.1 Mycosis fungoides can result in various complications including diffuse spread of a skin infection caused by HSV, known as KVE.1 Kaposi varicelliform eruption usually manifests clinically with painful skin vesicles that often are accompanied by systemic signs such as fever and malaise. The vesicles rapidly progress into pustules or erosions, predominantly affecting regions such as the head, neck, groin, and upper torso (Figure 1).2 Kaposi varicelliform eruption is considered a dermatologic emergency due to its potential to precipitate serious complications such as life-threatening secondary bacterial infection, HSV viremia, and multiorgan involvement; it also carries the risk of instigating ocular complications, such as keratitis, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, uveitis, and potential vision loss.2

Kaposi varicelliform eruption usually is diagnosed through clinical examination supported by polymerase chain reaction, viral culture, histopathology, HSV serology, and Tzanck smear.2 The differential diagnosis includes varicella, atypical varicella, herpes genitalis, herpes zoster, allergic or irritant contact dermatitis, or MF, which may result in painful skin ulcers.2-4 If an HSV superinfection is suspected, a polymerase chain reaction test ideally should be conducted within the first 72 hours of symptom onset.2 Herpes simplex virus infection may be reinforced by histologic features such as intraepidermal blistering, acantholysis, keratinocyte ballooning degeneration, and multinuclear giant cells with intranuclear inclusions. Given its severe nature, immediate empiric antiviral treatment for KVE is essential, even while awaiting confirmatory tests. The recommended treatment protocol involves acyclovir (400 mg orally 3 times daily or 10 mg/kg IV) or valacyclovir (500 mg orally twice daily), continued until KVE resolves.2
Herpes genitalis caused by HSV-2 is estimated to affect approximately 45 million adults in the United States.2 First-line treatment for HSV-2 includes acyclovir and its derivatives, which are viral nucleoside analogs that inhibit viral DNA polymerases.5,6 However, over the past 2 decades, increasing HSV resistance to acyclovir and its derivatives has been noted among immunocompromised patients.5,6 Second-line agents, such as IV foscarnet and cidofovir, require close laboratory monitoring for nephrotoxicity and are contraindicated in those with renal insufficiency, thus limiting their use.5 To combat acyclovir resistance, novel antivirals such as pritelivir are being developed. Pritelivir targets the HSV helicase-primase complex and has been shown to outperform acyclovir in in-vitro animal models.7 Due to its unique mechanism of action (Figure 2), pritelivir is effective against acyclovir-resistant HSV strains, and clinical trials suggest its serum half-life may allow for daily dosing. A phase 2 study showed pritelivir reduced viral shedding days, sped up genital lesion healing in adults infected with HSV-2, and exhibited a good safety profile.7 Our patient participated in ongoing open-label trials of pritelivir that aimed to assess its efficacy and safety in immunocompromised patients. Given the limited alternative treatments for acyclovir-resistant HSV-2, clinicians need to stay updated on antiviral agents under development.

- García-Díaz N, Piris MÁ, Ortiz-Romero PL, et al. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: an integrative review of the pathophysiology, molecular drivers, and targeted therapy. Cancers. 2021;13:1931. doi:10.3390/cancers13081931
- Baaniya B, Agrawal S. Kaposi varicelliform eruption in a patient with pemphigus vulgaris: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2020;2020:6695342. doi:10.1155/2020/6695342
- Shin D, Lee MS, Kim DY, et al. Increased large unstained cells value in varicella patients: a valuable parameter to aid rapid diagnosis of varicella infection. J Dermatol. 2015;42:795-799. doi:10.1111
- Joshi A, Sah SP, Agrawal S. Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption or atypical chickenpox in a normal individual. Australas J Dermatol. 2000;41:126-127.
- Groves MJ. Genital herpes: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2016; 93:928-934.
- Fleming DT, Leone P, Esposito D, et al. Herpes virus type 2 infection and genital symptoms in primary care patients. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:416-421. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000200578.86276.0b
- Poole CL, James SH. Antiviral therapies for herpesviruses: current agents and new directions. Clin Ther. 2018;40:1282-1298. doi:10.1016 /j.clinthera.2018.07.006.
- García-Díaz N, Piris MÁ, Ortiz-Romero PL, et al. Mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome: an integrative review of the pathophysiology, molecular drivers, and targeted therapy. Cancers. 2021;13:1931. doi:10.3390/cancers13081931
- Baaniya B, Agrawal S. Kaposi varicelliform eruption in a patient with pemphigus vulgaris: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Dermatol Med. 2020;2020:6695342. doi:10.1155/2020/6695342
- Shin D, Lee MS, Kim DY, et al. Increased large unstained cells value in varicella patients: a valuable parameter to aid rapid diagnosis of varicella infection. J Dermatol. 2015;42:795-799. doi:10.1111
- Joshi A, Sah SP, Agrawal S. Kaposi’s varicelliform eruption or atypical chickenpox in a normal individual. Australas J Dermatol. 2000;41:126-127.
- Groves MJ. Genital herpes: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2016; 93:928-934.
- Fleming DT, Leone P, Esposito D, et al. Herpes virus type 2 infection and genital symptoms in primary care patients. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:416-421. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000200578.86276.0b
- Poole CL, James SH. Antiviral therapies for herpesviruses: current agents and new directions. Clin Ther. 2018;40:1282-1298. doi:10.1016 /j.clinthera.2018.07.006.
Painful Edematous Labial Erosions
Painful Edematous Labial Erosions

A 40-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with painful, well-defined, edematous labial erosions of several weeks’ duration. The patient reported a medical history of stage IIIA (T4N0M0B0) mycosis fungoides. She had been hospitalized 2 months prior for sepsis that was attributed to a polymicrobial bacteremia involving Acinetobacter baumannii and Staphylococcus epidermidis. During that admission, a polymerase chain reaction test conducted on a skin swab from a lesion on the labia majora confirmed the presence of herpes simplex virus type 2. At the current presentation, physical examination by dermatology also revealed discrete, coalescing, erythematous erosions on the buttocks, groin, and proximal thighs with a punched-out appearance. These areas also exhibited skin sloughing and were covered with a gray-brown exudate. No other mucosal surfaces were involved.
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Tall Cell Carcinoma with Reversed Polarity
Background
Tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP) is a rare and distinct subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, defined by tall columnar cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and reversed nuclear polarity. TCCRP remains poorly characterized in the literature, with limited population-level evidence to guide management and prognostication. This study uses the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine the epidemiology, clinical features, and outcomes of this neoplasm.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis included 951 patients diagnosed with TCCRP (ICD-O-3 code 8509) from 2018–2020 using the NCDB. Demographic and treatment variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Incidence trends were assessed using linear regression, and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results
Most patients were female (98.1%) with a mean age of 69.1 years. The majority were White (82.0%), followed by Black (9.0%) and Hispanic (8.7%). Primary tumor sites included overlapping breast lesions (28.5%) and the upper-inner quadrant (27.0%). Incidence remained stable (R2 = 0.0). Most patients were diagnosed at Stage I (58.4%) and had a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 (76.2%). Socioeconomically, 41.8% lived in the highest income quartile (≥$74,063), and most had Medicare (64.7%). The most common treatment settings were comprehensive community cancer programs (40.3%). Surgery was performed in 95.6% of cases, with negative margins in 91.1%. Radiation therapy (46.6%) and hormone therapy (44.3%) were frequently used. Mortality was 1.1% at 30 days and 1.7% at 90 days. Survival was 98.9% at 2 years, 97.3% at 5 years, and 94.5% at 10 years, with a mean survival of 46.4 months.
Conclusions
This is the first NCDB-based study of TCCRP, highlighting favorable outcomes and distinct clinicodemographic features. Patients were predominantly older, White, and Medicare-insured, often receiving care at community cancer programs. These findings suggest that socioeconomic factors may influence access and treatment. Results may inform strategies to promote equitable care delivery across health systems and guide further research on clinical management and survivorship in TCCRP, particularly for rare cancers within community-based settings such as the VHA.
Background
Tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP) is a rare and distinct subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, defined by tall columnar cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and reversed nuclear polarity. TCCRP remains poorly characterized in the literature, with limited population-level evidence to guide management and prognostication. This study uses the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine the epidemiology, clinical features, and outcomes of this neoplasm.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis included 951 patients diagnosed with TCCRP (ICD-O-3 code 8509) from 2018–2020 using the NCDB. Demographic and treatment variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Incidence trends were assessed using linear regression, and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results
Most patients were female (98.1%) with a mean age of 69.1 years. The majority were White (82.0%), followed by Black (9.0%) and Hispanic (8.7%). Primary tumor sites included overlapping breast lesions (28.5%) and the upper-inner quadrant (27.0%). Incidence remained stable (R2 = 0.0). Most patients were diagnosed at Stage I (58.4%) and had a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 (76.2%). Socioeconomically, 41.8% lived in the highest income quartile (≥$74,063), and most had Medicare (64.7%). The most common treatment settings were comprehensive community cancer programs (40.3%). Surgery was performed in 95.6% of cases, with negative margins in 91.1%. Radiation therapy (46.6%) and hormone therapy (44.3%) were frequently used. Mortality was 1.1% at 30 days and 1.7% at 90 days. Survival was 98.9% at 2 years, 97.3% at 5 years, and 94.5% at 10 years, with a mean survival of 46.4 months.
Conclusions
This is the first NCDB-based study of TCCRP, highlighting favorable outcomes and distinct clinicodemographic features. Patients were predominantly older, White, and Medicare-insured, often receiving care at community cancer programs. These findings suggest that socioeconomic factors may influence access and treatment. Results may inform strategies to promote equitable care delivery across health systems and guide further research on clinical management and survivorship in TCCRP, particularly for rare cancers within community-based settings such as the VHA.
Background
Tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP) is a rare and distinct subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, defined by tall columnar cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and reversed nuclear polarity. TCCRP remains poorly characterized in the literature, with limited population-level evidence to guide management and prognostication. This study uses the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine the epidemiology, clinical features, and outcomes of this neoplasm.
Methods
A retrospective cohort analysis included 951 patients diagnosed with TCCRP (ICD-O-3 code 8509) from 2018–2020 using the NCDB. Demographic and treatment variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Incidence trends were assessed using linear regression, and overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Results
Most patients were female (98.1%) with a mean age of 69.1 years. The majority were White (82.0%), followed by Black (9.0%) and Hispanic (8.7%). Primary tumor sites included overlapping breast lesions (28.5%) and the upper-inner quadrant (27.0%). Incidence remained stable (R2 = 0.0). Most patients were diagnosed at Stage I (58.4%) and had a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 (76.2%). Socioeconomically, 41.8% lived in the highest income quartile (≥$74,063), and most had Medicare (64.7%). The most common treatment settings were comprehensive community cancer programs (40.3%). Surgery was performed in 95.6% of cases, with negative margins in 91.1%. Radiation therapy (46.6%) and hormone therapy (44.3%) were frequently used. Mortality was 1.1% at 30 days and 1.7% at 90 days. Survival was 98.9% at 2 years, 97.3% at 5 years, and 94.5% at 10 years, with a mean survival of 46.4 months.
Conclusions
This is the first NCDB-based study of TCCRP, highlighting favorable outcomes and distinct clinicodemographic features. Patients were predominantly older, White, and Medicare-insured, often receiving care at community cancer programs. These findings suggest that socioeconomic factors may influence access and treatment. Results may inform strategies to promote equitable care delivery across health systems and guide further research on clinical management and survivorship in TCCRP, particularly for rare cancers within community-based settings such as the VHA.
ERCC2, KDM6A, and TERT as Key Prognostic Factors in Bladder Cancer: Insights from the AACR Project GENIE Database
Background
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is among the top 10 frequently diagnosed cancers in the world. Mutations in FGFR3, ARID1A, and TP53 are well documented as being some of the most frequent mutations found in UC. Despite advances in treatment, survival outcomes remain poor, especially in advanced stages. To promote future pharmacotherapeutic development, the molecular understanding of UC needs to be continually updated using more recently available databases.
Methods
This study utilizes the AACR Project GENIE database from the American Association for Cancer Research to explore the mutational profiles of patients with UC. Gene mutation frequencies were calculated, and two Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for each gene, showing one curve for patients with the mutation and one for those without. Log-Rank tests were calculated with subsequent FDR (Benjamini–Hochberg) correction applied to account for multiple hypothesis testing. Data was analyzed using R 4.4.2 and statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
Results
In this study, 4525 patients had histology consistent with UC. The 5 most common mutations were TERT (n = 1714, 37.9%), TP53 (n = 1689, 37.3%), KDM6A (n = 1091, 24.1%), ARID1A (n = 872, 19.3%), and FGFR3 (n = 762, 16.8%). Mutations associated with differential survival outcomes included ERCC2 (mutated n = 387, wild type n = 3751, p < 0.0001), KDM6A (mutated n = 1091, wild type n = 3047, p < 0.0001), TERT (mutated n = 1714, wild type n = 2424), and TP53 (mutated n = 1689, wild type n = 2449, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Interestingly, while mutations in TP53 and ERCC2 were associated with shorter median survival, mutations in KDM6A and TERT were associated with longer median survival.
Background
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is among the top 10 frequently diagnosed cancers in the world. Mutations in FGFR3, ARID1A, and TP53 are well documented as being some of the most frequent mutations found in UC. Despite advances in treatment, survival outcomes remain poor, especially in advanced stages. To promote future pharmacotherapeutic development, the molecular understanding of UC needs to be continually updated using more recently available databases.
Methods
This study utilizes the AACR Project GENIE database from the American Association for Cancer Research to explore the mutational profiles of patients with UC. Gene mutation frequencies were calculated, and two Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for each gene, showing one curve for patients with the mutation and one for those without. Log-Rank tests were calculated with subsequent FDR (Benjamini–Hochberg) correction applied to account for multiple hypothesis testing. Data was analyzed using R 4.4.2 and statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
Results
In this study, 4525 patients had histology consistent with UC. The 5 most common mutations were TERT (n = 1714, 37.9%), TP53 (n = 1689, 37.3%), KDM6A (n = 1091, 24.1%), ARID1A (n = 872, 19.3%), and FGFR3 (n = 762, 16.8%). Mutations associated with differential survival outcomes included ERCC2 (mutated n = 387, wild type n = 3751, p < 0.0001), KDM6A (mutated n = 1091, wild type n = 3047, p < 0.0001), TERT (mutated n = 1714, wild type n = 2424), and TP53 (mutated n = 1689, wild type n = 2449, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Interestingly, while mutations in TP53 and ERCC2 were associated with shorter median survival, mutations in KDM6A and TERT were associated with longer median survival.
Background
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is among the top 10 frequently diagnosed cancers in the world. Mutations in FGFR3, ARID1A, and TP53 are well documented as being some of the most frequent mutations found in UC. Despite advances in treatment, survival outcomes remain poor, especially in advanced stages. To promote future pharmacotherapeutic development, the molecular understanding of UC needs to be continually updated using more recently available databases.
Methods
This study utilizes the AACR Project GENIE database from the American Association for Cancer Research to explore the mutational profiles of patients with UC. Gene mutation frequencies were calculated, and two Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn for each gene, showing one curve for patients with the mutation and one for those without. Log-Rank tests were calculated with subsequent FDR (Benjamini–Hochberg) correction applied to account for multiple hypothesis testing. Data was analyzed using R 4.4.2 and statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
Results
In this study, 4525 patients had histology consistent with UC. The 5 most common mutations were TERT (n = 1714, 37.9%), TP53 (n = 1689, 37.3%), KDM6A (n = 1091, 24.1%), ARID1A (n = 872, 19.3%), and FGFR3 (n = 762, 16.8%). Mutations associated with differential survival outcomes included ERCC2 (mutated n = 387, wild type n = 3751, p < 0.0001), KDM6A (mutated n = 1091, wild type n = 3047, p < 0.0001), TERT (mutated n = 1714, wild type n = 2424), and TP53 (mutated n = 1689, wild type n = 2449, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Interestingly, while mutations in TP53 and ERCC2 were associated with shorter median survival, mutations in KDM6A and TERT were associated with longer median survival.
Communication Modality (CM) Among Veterans Using National TeleOncology (NTO) Services
Background
We examined characteristics of Veterans receiving care through NTO and their CM (e.g., telephone only [T], video only [V], or both [TV]). Relevant background: In-person VA cancer care can be challenging for many Veterans due to rurality, transportation, finances, and distance to subspecialists. Such factors may impact care modality preferences.
Methods
We linked a list of all Veterans who received NTO care with Corporate Data Warehouse data to confirm an ICD-10 diagnostic code for malignancy, and to define the number of NTO interactions, latency of days between diagnosis and first NTO interaction, and demographics. The Office of Rural Health categories for rurality and NIH categories for race were used.
Data analysis
We report descriptive statistics for CM. To compare differences between Veterans by CM, we report chi-squared tests for categorical variables and ANOVAs for continuous variables.
Results
Among 13,902 NTO Veterans with CM data, most were V (9,998, 72%), few were T 2% (n= 295), and some were TV 26% (n= 3,609). There were statistically significant differences between CM in number of interactions, latency between diagnosis and first NTO interaction, age at first NTO interaction, sex, race, rurality, and cancer type. Veterans diagnosed with lung cancer were more likely to exclusively use T. Veterans with breast cancer were more likely to exclusively use V. Specifically, T were oldest (mean age = 74.3), followed by TV (69.0) and V (61.6; p < .001). Women were most represented in V (28.3%) and Rural or highly rural residence was most common among T users (54.6%), compared to V (36.8%) and TV (43.0%; p < .001). Urban users were more prevalent in the TV group (61.9%) than in the T only group (45.4%).
Implications
We identified differences in communication modality based on Veteran characteristics. This could suggest differences in Veteran or provider preference, feasibility, or acceptability, based on CM.
Significance
While V communications appear to be achievable for many Veterans, more work is needed to determine preference, feasibility, and acceptability among Veterans and their care teams regarding V and T only cancer care.
Background
We examined characteristics of Veterans receiving care through NTO and their CM (e.g., telephone only [T], video only [V], or both [TV]). Relevant background: In-person VA cancer care can be challenging for many Veterans due to rurality, transportation, finances, and distance to subspecialists. Such factors may impact care modality preferences.
Methods
We linked a list of all Veterans who received NTO care with Corporate Data Warehouse data to confirm an ICD-10 diagnostic code for malignancy, and to define the number of NTO interactions, latency of days between diagnosis and first NTO interaction, and demographics. The Office of Rural Health categories for rurality and NIH categories for race were used.
Data analysis
We report descriptive statistics for CM. To compare differences between Veterans by CM, we report chi-squared tests for categorical variables and ANOVAs for continuous variables.
Results
Among 13,902 NTO Veterans with CM data, most were V (9,998, 72%), few were T 2% (n= 295), and some were TV 26% (n= 3,609). There were statistically significant differences between CM in number of interactions, latency between diagnosis and first NTO interaction, age at first NTO interaction, sex, race, rurality, and cancer type. Veterans diagnosed with lung cancer were more likely to exclusively use T. Veterans with breast cancer were more likely to exclusively use V. Specifically, T were oldest (mean age = 74.3), followed by TV (69.0) and V (61.6; p < .001). Women were most represented in V (28.3%) and Rural or highly rural residence was most common among T users (54.6%), compared to V (36.8%) and TV (43.0%; p < .001). Urban users were more prevalent in the TV group (61.9%) than in the T only group (45.4%).
Implications
We identified differences in communication modality based on Veteran characteristics. This could suggest differences in Veteran or provider preference, feasibility, or acceptability, based on CM.
Significance
While V communications appear to be achievable for many Veterans, more work is needed to determine preference, feasibility, and acceptability among Veterans and their care teams regarding V and T only cancer care.
Background
We examined characteristics of Veterans receiving care through NTO and their CM (e.g., telephone only [T], video only [V], or both [TV]). Relevant background: In-person VA cancer care can be challenging for many Veterans due to rurality, transportation, finances, and distance to subspecialists. Such factors may impact care modality preferences.
Methods
We linked a list of all Veterans who received NTO care with Corporate Data Warehouse data to confirm an ICD-10 diagnostic code for malignancy, and to define the number of NTO interactions, latency of days between diagnosis and first NTO interaction, and demographics. The Office of Rural Health categories for rurality and NIH categories for race were used.
Data analysis
We report descriptive statistics for CM. To compare differences between Veterans by CM, we report chi-squared tests for categorical variables and ANOVAs for continuous variables.
Results
Among 13,902 NTO Veterans with CM data, most were V (9,998, 72%), few were T 2% (n= 295), and some were TV 26% (n= 3,609). There were statistically significant differences between CM in number of interactions, latency between diagnosis and first NTO interaction, age at first NTO interaction, sex, race, rurality, and cancer type. Veterans diagnosed with lung cancer were more likely to exclusively use T. Veterans with breast cancer were more likely to exclusively use V. Specifically, T were oldest (mean age = 74.3), followed by TV (69.0) and V (61.6; p < .001). Women were most represented in V (28.3%) and Rural or highly rural residence was most common among T users (54.6%), compared to V (36.8%) and TV (43.0%; p < .001). Urban users were more prevalent in the TV group (61.9%) than in the T only group (45.4%).
Implications
We identified differences in communication modality based on Veteran characteristics. This could suggest differences in Veteran or provider preference, feasibility, or acceptability, based on CM.
Significance
While V communications appear to be achievable for many Veterans, more work is needed to determine preference, feasibility, and acceptability among Veterans and their care teams regarding V and T only cancer care.
Organs of Metastasis Predominate with Age in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Subtypes: National Cancer Database Analysis
Background
Patients diagnosed with lung cancer are predominantly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Thus, it is imperative to investigate and distinguish the differences present at diagnosis to possibly improve survival outcomes. NSCLC commonly metastasizes within older patients near the mean age of 71 years, but also in early onset patients which represents the patients younger than the earliest lung cancer screening age of 50.
Objective
To reveal differences in ratios of metastasis locations in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (ACC), and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC).
Methods
The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients diagnosed with SCC, ACC, and ASC using the histology codes 8070, 8140, and 8560 from the ICD-O-3.2 from 2004 to 2022. Age groups were 70 years. Metastases located to the brain, liver, bone, and lung were included. Chi-Square tests were performed. The data was analyzed using R version 4.4.2 and statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.
Results
In this study, 1,445,119 patients were analyzed. Chi-Square tests identified significant differences in the ratios of organ metastasis locations between age groups in each subtype (p < 0.001). SCC in each age group similarly metastasized most to bone (36.3%, 34.7%, 34.5%), but notably more local lung metastasis was observed in the oldest group (33.6%). In ACC and ASC, the oldest group also had greater ratios of spread within the lungs (28.0%, 27.2%). Overall, the younger the age group, distant spread to the brain increased (ex. 29.0%, 24.4%, 17.5%). This suggests a widely heterogenous distribution of metastases at diagnosis of NSCLC subtypes and patient age.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that patients with SCC, ACC, or ASC subtypes of NSCLC share similar predominant locations based in part on patient age, irrespective of cancer origin. NSCLC may more distantly metastasize in younger patients to the brain, while older patients may have locally metastatic cancer. Further analysis of key demographic variables as well as common undertaken treatment options may prove informative and reveal existing differences in survival outcomes.
Background
Patients diagnosed with lung cancer are predominantly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Thus, it is imperative to investigate and distinguish the differences present at diagnosis to possibly improve survival outcomes. NSCLC commonly metastasizes within older patients near the mean age of 71 years, but also in early onset patients which represents the patients younger than the earliest lung cancer screening age of 50.
Objective
To reveal differences in ratios of metastasis locations in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (ACC), and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC).
Methods
The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients diagnosed with SCC, ACC, and ASC using the histology codes 8070, 8140, and 8560 from the ICD-O-3.2 from 2004 to 2022. Age groups were 70 years. Metastases located to the brain, liver, bone, and lung were included. Chi-Square tests were performed. The data was analyzed using R version 4.4.2 and statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.
Results
In this study, 1,445,119 patients were analyzed. Chi-Square tests identified significant differences in the ratios of organ metastasis locations between age groups in each subtype (p < 0.001). SCC in each age group similarly metastasized most to bone (36.3%, 34.7%, 34.5%), but notably more local lung metastasis was observed in the oldest group (33.6%). In ACC and ASC, the oldest group also had greater ratios of spread within the lungs (28.0%, 27.2%). Overall, the younger the age group, distant spread to the brain increased (ex. 29.0%, 24.4%, 17.5%). This suggests a widely heterogenous distribution of metastases at diagnosis of NSCLC subtypes and patient age.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that patients with SCC, ACC, or ASC subtypes of NSCLC share similar predominant locations based in part on patient age, irrespective of cancer origin. NSCLC may more distantly metastasize in younger patients to the brain, while older patients may have locally metastatic cancer. Further analysis of key demographic variables as well as common undertaken treatment options may prove informative and reveal existing differences in survival outcomes.
Background
Patients diagnosed with lung cancer are predominantly non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Thus, it is imperative to investigate and distinguish the differences present at diagnosis to possibly improve survival outcomes. NSCLC commonly metastasizes within older patients near the mean age of 71 years, but also in early onset patients which represents the patients younger than the earliest lung cancer screening age of 50.
Objective
To reveal differences in ratios of metastasis locations in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), adenocarcinoma (ACC), and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC).
Methods
The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients diagnosed with SCC, ACC, and ASC using the histology codes 8070, 8140, and 8560 from the ICD-O-3.2 from 2004 to 2022. Age groups were 70 years. Metastases located to the brain, liver, bone, and lung were included. Chi-Square tests were performed. The data was analyzed using R version 4.4.2 and statistical significance was set to α = 0.05.
Results
In this study, 1,445,119 patients were analyzed. Chi-Square tests identified significant differences in the ratios of organ metastasis locations between age groups in each subtype (p < 0.001). SCC in each age group similarly metastasized most to bone (36.3%, 34.7%, 34.5%), but notably more local lung metastasis was observed in the oldest group (33.6%). In ACC and ASC, the oldest group also had greater ratios of spread within the lungs (28.0%, 27.2%). Overall, the younger the age group, distant spread to the brain increased (ex. 29.0%, 24.4%, 17.5%). This suggests a widely heterogenous distribution of metastases at diagnosis of NSCLC subtypes and patient age.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that patients with SCC, ACC, or ASC subtypes of NSCLC share similar predominant locations based in part on patient age, irrespective of cancer origin. NSCLC may more distantly metastasize in younger patients to the brain, while older patients may have locally metastatic cancer. Further analysis of key demographic variables as well as common undertaken treatment options may prove informative and reveal existing differences in survival outcomes.
Shifting Demographics: A Temporal Analysis of the Alarming Rise in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Among Young Adults
Background
Rectal adenocarcinoma has long been associated with older adults, with routine screening typically beginning at age 45 or older. However, recent data reveal a concerning rise in rectal cancer incidence among adults under 40. These early-onset cases often present at later stages and may have distinct biological features. While some research attributes this trend to genetic or environmental factors, the contribution of socioeconomic disparities and healthcare access has not been fully explored. Identifying these influences is essential to shaping targeted prevention and early detection strategies for younger populations.
Objective
To evaluate temporal trends in rectal adenocarcinoma among young adults and assess demographic and socioeconomic predictors of early-onset diagnosis.
Methods
Data were drawn from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2022. Among 440,316 cases, 17,842 (4.1%) occurred in individuals under 40. Linear regression assessed temporal trends, while logistic regression evaluated associations between early-onset diagnosis and variables including sex, race, insurance status, income level, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, and tumor stage. Statistical significance was defined as α = 0.05.
Results
The number of young adults diagnosed rose from 424 in 2004 to 937 in 2022—an increase of over 120%. Each year was associated with a 1.7% rise in odds of early diagnosis (OR = 1.017, p < 0.001). Male patients had 24.7% higher odds (OR = 1.247, p < 0.001), and Black patients had 59.3% higher odds compared to White patients (OR = 1.593, p < 0.001). Non-private insurance was linked to a 41.6% decrease in early diagnosis (OR = 0.584, p < 0.001). Income level was not significant (p = 0.426). Lower Charlson-Deyo scores and higher tumor stages were also associated with early-onset cases.
Conclusions
Rectal adenocarcinoma is increasingly affecting younger adults, with significant associations across demographic and insurance variables. These findings call for improved awareness, early diagnostic strategies, and further research into underlying causes to mitigate this growing public health concern.
Background
Rectal adenocarcinoma has long been associated with older adults, with routine screening typically beginning at age 45 or older. However, recent data reveal a concerning rise in rectal cancer incidence among adults under 40. These early-onset cases often present at later stages and may have distinct biological features. While some research attributes this trend to genetic or environmental factors, the contribution of socioeconomic disparities and healthcare access has not been fully explored. Identifying these influences is essential to shaping targeted prevention and early detection strategies for younger populations.
Objective
To evaluate temporal trends in rectal adenocarcinoma among young adults and assess demographic and socioeconomic predictors of early-onset diagnosis.
Methods
Data were drawn from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2022. Among 440,316 cases, 17,842 (4.1%) occurred in individuals under 40. Linear regression assessed temporal trends, while logistic regression evaluated associations between early-onset diagnosis and variables including sex, race, insurance status, income level, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, and tumor stage. Statistical significance was defined as α = 0.05.
Results
The number of young adults diagnosed rose from 424 in 2004 to 937 in 2022—an increase of over 120%. Each year was associated with a 1.7% rise in odds of early diagnosis (OR = 1.017, p < 0.001). Male patients had 24.7% higher odds (OR = 1.247, p < 0.001), and Black patients had 59.3% higher odds compared to White patients (OR = 1.593, p < 0.001). Non-private insurance was linked to a 41.6% decrease in early diagnosis (OR = 0.584, p < 0.001). Income level was not significant (p = 0.426). Lower Charlson-Deyo scores and higher tumor stages were also associated with early-onset cases.
Conclusions
Rectal adenocarcinoma is increasingly affecting younger adults, with significant associations across demographic and insurance variables. These findings call for improved awareness, early diagnostic strategies, and further research into underlying causes to mitigate this growing public health concern.
Background
Rectal adenocarcinoma has long been associated with older adults, with routine screening typically beginning at age 45 or older. However, recent data reveal a concerning rise in rectal cancer incidence among adults under 40. These early-onset cases often present at later stages and may have distinct biological features. While some research attributes this trend to genetic or environmental factors, the contribution of socioeconomic disparities and healthcare access has not been fully explored. Identifying these influences is essential to shaping targeted prevention and early detection strategies for younger populations.
Objective
To evaluate temporal trends in rectal adenocarcinoma among young adults and assess demographic and socioeconomic predictors of early-onset diagnosis.
Methods
Data were drawn from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2022. Among 440,316 cases, 17,842 (4.1%) occurred in individuals under 40. Linear regression assessed temporal trends, while logistic regression evaluated associations between early-onset diagnosis and variables including sex, race, insurance status, income level, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, and tumor stage. Statistical significance was defined as α = 0.05.
Results
The number of young adults diagnosed rose from 424 in 2004 to 937 in 2022—an increase of over 120%. Each year was associated with a 1.7% rise in odds of early diagnosis (OR = 1.017, p < 0.001). Male patients had 24.7% higher odds (OR = 1.247, p < 0.001), and Black patients had 59.3% higher odds compared to White patients (OR = 1.593, p < 0.001). Non-private insurance was linked to a 41.6% decrease in early diagnosis (OR = 0.584, p < 0.001). Income level was not significant (p = 0.426). Lower Charlson-Deyo scores and higher tumor stages were also associated with early-onset cases.
Conclusions
Rectal adenocarcinoma is increasingly affecting younger adults, with significant associations across demographic and insurance variables. These findings call for improved awareness, early diagnostic strategies, and further research into underlying causes to mitigate this growing public health concern.
Epidemiology and Survival of Parotid Gland Malignancies With Brain Metastases: A Population- Based Study
Background
Parotid gland malignancies are a rare subset of salivary gland tumors, comprising approximately 1–3% of all head and neck cancers. While distant metastases commonly involve the lungs, brain metastases are exceedingly rare and remain poorly characterized. Management typically includes stereotactic radiosurgery or whole-brain radiation. This study evaluates the incidence, clinicopathologic features, and survival outcomes of patients with parotid gland tumors and brain metastases using data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Methods
SEER database (2010–2022) was queried for patients diagnosed with primary malignant neoplasms of the parotid gland (ICD-O-3 site code C07.9). Cases of brain metastases were identified using SEER metastatic site variables. Age-adjusted incidence rates (IR) per 100,000 population were calculated using SEER*Stat 8.4.5. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism, and survival differences were assessed using the log-rank test.
Results
Among 12,951 patients diagnosed with parotid malignancy, 47 (0.36%) had brain metastases. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years, and 77.5% were male. The overall incidence rate (IR) of brain metastases was 0.00235 per 100,000 population, with a significantly higher rate observed in males compared to females (p < 0.0001). The most common histologic subtype associated with brain involvement was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n=10), followed by adenocarcinoma. Median overall survival (mOS) for patients with brain metastases was 2 months (hazard ratio [HR] 6.28; 95% CI: 2.71–14.55), compared to 131 months for those without brain involvement (p < 0.001). 1-year cancer-specific survival for patients with brain metastases was 38%. Among patients with parotid SCC and brain metastases, mOS was 3 months, compared to 39 months in those without brain involvement (HR 5.70; 95% CI: 1.09–29.68; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Brain metastases from parotid gland cancers, though rare, are associated with markedly poor outcomes. This highlights the importance of early neurologic assessment and brain imaging in high-risk patients, particularly with SCC histology. Prior studies have shown that TP53 mutations are common in parotid SCC, but their role in CNS spread remains unclear. Future research should explore molecular pathways underlying neurotropism in parotid cancers and investigate targeted systemic therapies with CNS penetration to improve outcomes.
Background
Parotid gland malignancies are a rare subset of salivary gland tumors, comprising approximately 1–3% of all head and neck cancers. While distant metastases commonly involve the lungs, brain metastases are exceedingly rare and remain poorly characterized. Management typically includes stereotactic radiosurgery or whole-brain radiation. This study evaluates the incidence, clinicopathologic features, and survival outcomes of patients with parotid gland tumors and brain metastases using data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Methods
SEER database (2010–2022) was queried for patients diagnosed with primary malignant neoplasms of the parotid gland (ICD-O-3 site code C07.9). Cases of brain metastases were identified using SEER metastatic site variables. Age-adjusted incidence rates (IR) per 100,000 population were calculated using SEER*Stat 8.4.5. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism, and survival differences were assessed using the log-rank test.
Results
Among 12,951 patients diagnosed with parotid malignancy, 47 (0.36%) had brain metastases. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years, and 77.5% were male. The overall incidence rate (IR) of brain metastases was 0.00235 per 100,000 population, with a significantly higher rate observed in males compared to females (p < 0.0001). The most common histologic subtype associated with brain involvement was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n=10), followed by adenocarcinoma. Median overall survival (mOS) for patients with brain metastases was 2 months (hazard ratio [HR] 6.28; 95% CI: 2.71–14.55), compared to 131 months for those without brain involvement (p < 0.001). 1-year cancer-specific survival for patients with brain metastases was 38%. Among patients with parotid SCC and brain metastases, mOS was 3 months, compared to 39 months in those without brain involvement (HR 5.70; 95% CI: 1.09–29.68; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Brain metastases from parotid gland cancers, though rare, are associated with markedly poor outcomes. This highlights the importance of early neurologic assessment and brain imaging in high-risk patients, particularly with SCC histology. Prior studies have shown that TP53 mutations are common in parotid SCC, but their role in CNS spread remains unclear. Future research should explore molecular pathways underlying neurotropism in parotid cancers and investigate targeted systemic therapies with CNS penetration to improve outcomes.
Background
Parotid gland malignancies are a rare subset of salivary gland tumors, comprising approximately 1–3% of all head and neck cancers. While distant metastases commonly involve the lungs, brain metastases are exceedingly rare and remain poorly characterized. Management typically includes stereotactic radiosurgery or whole-brain radiation. This study evaluates the incidence, clinicopathologic features, and survival outcomes of patients with parotid gland tumors and brain metastases using data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.
Methods
SEER database (2010–2022) was queried for patients diagnosed with primary malignant neoplasms of the parotid gland (ICD-O-3 site code C07.9). Cases of brain metastases were identified using SEER metastatic site variables. Age-adjusted incidence rates (IR) per 100,000 population were calculated using SEER*Stat 8.4.5. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism, and survival differences were assessed using the log-rank test.
Results
Among 12,951 patients diagnosed with parotid malignancy, 47 (0.36%) had brain metastases. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years, and 77.5% were male. The overall incidence rate (IR) of brain metastases was 0.00235 per 100,000 population, with a significantly higher rate observed in males compared to females (p < 0.0001). The most common histologic subtype associated with brain involvement was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n=10), followed by adenocarcinoma. Median overall survival (mOS) for patients with brain metastases was 2 months (hazard ratio [HR] 6.28; 95% CI: 2.71–14.55), compared to 131 months for those without brain involvement (p < 0.001). 1-year cancer-specific survival for patients with brain metastases was 38%. Among patients with parotid SCC and brain metastases, mOS was 3 months, compared to 39 months in those without brain involvement (HR 5.70; 95% CI: 1.09–29.68; p < 0.0001).
Conclusions
Brain metastases from parotid gland cancers, though rare, are associated with markedly poor outcomes. This highlights the importance of early neurologic assessment and brain imaging in high-risk patients, particularly with SCC histology. Prior studies have shown that TP53 mutations are common in parotid SCC, but their role in CNS spread remains unclear. Future research should explore molecular pathways underlying neurotropism in parotid cancers and investigate targeted systemic therapies with CNS penetration to improve outcomes.