Score can predict thrombosis in ITP

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 11/15/2018 - 00:03
Display Headline
Score can predict thrombosis in ITP

Image by Andre E.X. Brown
Thrombus

New research suggests a scoring system can predict the risk of thrombosis in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who are taking anticoagulants.

Researchers tested their Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia (TH2) risk assessment score in a small group of ITP patients on anticoagulants, and the score identified all seven patients who developed thrombosis.

The researchers also found that patients’ TH2 scores changed quickly—within a matter of days—which suggests they should be re-evaluated for thrombosis risk frequently.

Amaris K. Balitsky, MD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and her colleagues detailed this research in Blood.

About the score

To develop the TH2 score, the researchers conducted a review of the literature and existing tools used to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. The resulting score consists of two thrombosis items and two bleeding items.

The thrombosis items are:

  • High thrombotic risk, which includes patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score greater than five; unprovoked, recurrent, or cancer-associated thrombosis; or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
  • Receipt of ITP therapies known to increase the risk of thrombosis in the previous 14 days or splenectomy in the previous 30 days.

The score’s bleeding items are:

  • Platelet count less than 20 x 109/L
  • Major bleeding (grade 2 bleeding that does not involve the skin) observed at a clinical encounter.

Each thrombosis item is assigned a score of +1, and each bleeding item is assigned a score of -1. A positive score or score of 0 suggests a net increased risk of thrombosis, and a negative score suggests a net increased risk of bleeding.

Patient population

The researchers tested the TH2 score in patients enrolled in the McMaster ITP Registry from 2010 to 2017.

There were 314 patients enrolled, but only 13 were receiving anticoagulation and had a platelet count less than 50 x 109/L. Six of these patients were receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation and seven for venous thrombosis. Four patients were taking antiplatelet agents as well.

The median follow up was 9 months (interquartile range, 4.5 to 24 months). During that time, there were 41 clinical encounters. Data on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes were available for 32 of these encounters.

Ten of the 13 patients had anticoagulation withheld at some point during their 22 clinical encounters. Major bleeding was present at five of the encounters. At 17 encounters, patients received additional ITP treatments.

Six of the 10 patients who stopped anticoagulation had new thrombotic events, and two of these events were fatal. Three of the patients had thrombotic events even though they resumed anticoagulation.

The remaining three patients (of the 13) did not stop anticoagulation. These patients received additional ITP treatments at six of their 10 clinical encounters.

Major bleeding was present at two of the 10 encounters, and one new thrombotic event occurred in a patient with metastatic squamous cell cancer (despite continued treatment with warfarin).

Testing the score

The TH2 score accurately predicted all seven thrombotic events.

There were four patients who initially had a negative TH2 score, which suggested an increased risk of bleeding.

However, these patients had a positive or 0 score—suggesting an increased risk of thrombosis—when they were assessed again, after their platelet counts increased above 50 x 109/L.

The remaining three patients had initial scores of 0 and subsequent positive scores, both suggesting an increased risk of thrombosis.

The researchers said these findings suggest patients should be re-evaluated for thrombosis risk frequently, as ITP treatments are given and platelet counts increase.

 

 

“The results of our study suggest that the risk of thrombosis is high in patients with ITP who have a separate indication for anticoagulation, especially after ITP therapies are administered and the severe thrombocytopenia improves,” the researchers wrote. “Early resumption of anticoagulation should be considered in this population.”

The researchers also noted that this study was limited by its retrospective, single-center design and the small number of patients evaluated. Therefore, the TH2 score should be validated in additional, larger studies.

One researcher reported relationships with Amgen, Novartis, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Principia Biopharma. The other researchers said they had no competing financial interests.

Publications
Topics

Image by Andre E.X. Brown
Thrombus

New research suggests a scoring system can predict the risk of thrombosis in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who are taking anticoagulants.

Researchers tested their Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia (TH2) risk assessment score in a small group of ITP patients on anticoagulants, and the score identified all seven patients who developed thrombosis.

The researchers also found that patients’ TH2 scores changed quickly—within a matter of days—which suggests they should be re-evaluated for thrombosis risk frequently.

Amaris K. Balitsky, MD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and her colleagues detailed this research in Blood.

About the score

To develop the TH2 score, the researchers conducted a review of the literature and existing tools used to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. The resulting score consists of two thrombosis items and two bleeding items.

The thrombosis items are:

  • High thrombotic risk, which includes patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score greater than five; unprovoked, recurrent, or cancer-associated thrombosis; or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
  • Receipt of ITP therapies known to increase the risk of thrombosis in the previous 14 days or splenectomy in the previous 30 days.

The score’s bleeding items are:

  • Platelet count less than 20 x 109/L
  • Major bleeding (grade 2 bleeding that does not involve the skin) observed at a clinical encounter.

Each thrombosis item is assigned a score of +1, and each bleeding item is assigned a score of -1. A positive score or score of 0 suggests a net increased risk of thrombosis, and a negative score suggests a net increased risk of bleeding.

Patient population

The researchers tested the TH2 score in patients enrolled in the McMaster ITP Registry from 2010 to 2017.

There were 314 patients enrolled, but only 13 were receiving anticoagulation and had a platelet count less than 50 x 109/L. Six of these patients were receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation and seven for venous thrombosis. Four patients were taking antiplatelet agents as well.

The median follow up was 9 months (interquartile range, 4.5 to 24 months). During that time, there were 41 clinical encounters. Data on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes were available for 32 of these encounters.

Ten of the 13 patients had anticoagulation withheld at some point during their 22 clinical encounters. Major bleeding was present at five of the encounters. At 17 encounters, patients received additional ITP treatments.

Six of the 10 patients who stopped anticoagulation had new thrombotic events, and two of these events were fatal. Three of the patients had thrombotic events even though they resumed anticoagulation.

The remaining three patients (of the 13) did not stop anticoagulation. These patients received additional ITP treatments at six of their 10 clinical encounters.

Major bleeding was present at two of the 10 encounters, and one new thrombotic event occurred in a patient with metastatic squamous cell cancer (despite continued treatment with warfarin).

Testing the score

The TH2 score accurately predicted all seven thrombotic events.

There were four patients who initially had a negative TH2 score, which suggested an increased risk of bleeding.

However, these patients had a positive or 0 score—suggesting an increased risk of thrombosis—when they were assessed again, after their platelet counts increased above 50 x 109/L.

The remaining three patients had initial scores of 0 and subsequent positive scores, both suggesting an increased risk of thrombosis.

The researchers said these findings suggest patients should be re-evaluated for thrombosis risk frequently, as ITP treatments are given and platelet counts increase.

 

 

“The results of our study suggest that the risk of thrombosis is high in patients with ITP who have a separate indication for anticoagulation, especially after ITP therapies are administered and the severe thrombocytopenia improves,” the researchers wrote. “Early resumption of anticoagulation should be considered in this population.”

The researchers also noted that this study was limited by its retrospective, single-center design and the small number of patients evaluated. Therefore, the TH2 score should be validated in additional, larger studies.

One researcher reported relationships with Amgen, Novartis, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Principia Biopharma. The other researchers said they had no competing financial interests.

Image by Andre E.X. Brown
Thrombus

New research suggests a scoring system can predict the risk of thrombosis in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who are taking anticoagulants.

Researchers tested their Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia (TH2) risk assessment score in a small group of ITP patients on anticoagulants, and the score identified all seven patients who developed thrombosis.

The researchers also found that patients’ TH2 scores changed quickly—within a matter of days—which suggests they should be re-evaluated for thrombosis risk frequently.

Amaris K. Balitsky, MD, of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and her colleagues detailed this research in Blood.

About the score

To develop the TH2 score, the researchers conducted a review of the literature and existing tools used to assess the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. The resulting score consists of two thrombosis items and two bleeding items.

The thrombosis items are:

  • High thrombotic risk, which includes patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score greater than five; unprovoked, recurrent, or cancer-associated thrombosis; or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome
  • Receipt of ITP therapies known to increase the risk of thrombosis in the previous 14 days or splenectomy in the previous 30 days.

The score’s bleeding items are:

  • Platelet count less than 20 x 109/L
  • Major bleeding (grade 2 bleeding that does not involve the skin) observed at a clinical encounter.

Each thrombosis item is assigned a score of +1, and each bleeding item is assigned a score of -1. A positive score or score of 0 suggests a net increased risk of thrombosis, and a negative score suggests a net increased risk of bleeding.

Patient population

The researchers tested the TH2 score in patients enrolled in the McMaster ITP Registry from 2010 to 2017.

There were 314 patients enrolled, but only 13 were receiving anticoagulation and had a platelet count less than 50 x 109/L. Six of these patients were receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation and seven for venous thrombosis. Four patients were taking antiplatelet agents as well.

The median follow up was 9 months (interquartile range, 4.5 to 24 months). During that time, there were 41 clinical encounters. Data on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes were available for 32 of these encounters.

Ten of the 13 patients had anticoagulation withheld at some point during their 22 clinical encounters. Major bleeding was present at five of the encounters. At 17 encounters, patients received additional ITP treatments.

Six of the 10 patients who stopped anticoagulation had new thrombotic events, and two of these events were fatal. Three of the patients had thrombotic events even though they resumed anticoagulation.

The remaining three patients (of the 13) did not stop anticoagulation. These patients received additional ITP treatments at six of their 10 clinical encounters.

Major bleeding was present at two of the 10 encounters, and one new thrombotic event occurred in a patient with metastatic squamous cell cancer (despite continued treatment with warfarin).

Testing the score

The TH2 score accurately predicted all seven thrombotic events.

There were four patients who initially had a negative TH2 score, which suggested an increased risk of bleeding.

However, these patients had a positive or 0 score—suggesting an increased risk of thrombosis—when they were assessed again, after their platelet counts increased above 50 x 109/L.

The remaining three patients had initial scores of 0 and subsequent positive scores, both suggesting an increased risk of thrombosis.

The researchers said these findings suggest patients should be re-evaluated for thrombosis risk frequently, as ITP treatments are given and platelet counts increase.

 

 

“The results of our study suggest that the risk of thrombosis is high in patients with ITP who have a separate indication for anticoagulation, especially after ITP therapies are administered and the severe thrombocytopenia improves,” the researchers wrote. “Early resumption of anticoagulation should be considered in this population.”

The researchers also noted that this study was limited by its retrospective, single-center design and the small number of patients evaluated. Therefore, the TH2 score should be validated in additional, larger studies.

One researcher reported relationships with Amgen, Novartis, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, UCB, and Principia Biopharma. The other researchers said they had no competing financial interests.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Score can predict thrombosis in ITP
Display Headline
Score can predict thrombosis in ITP
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Health Canada approves two tests for CML patients

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 11/15/2018 - 00:01
Display Headline
Health Canada approves two tests for CML patients

Image by Difu Wu
CML cells

Health Canada has approved the use of two tests designed to detect BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)—the MRDx® BCR-ABL Test and the QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit.

MolecularMD’s MRDx® BCR-ABL Test is approved as an aid to monitor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML patients.

This test is also approved to identify CML patients in the chronic phase being treated with nilotinib who, after sustaining a deep molecular response of MR4.5, may be eligible to stop treatment and be monitored for treatment-free remission.

Asuragen, Inc.’s QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is approved for use in CML patients, regardless of whether they are taking a TKI or how their disease is being managed.

The kit is designed to detect and quantify major breakpoint (e13a2, e14a2) BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts for use in monitoring molecular response.

Both the MRDx® BCR-ABL Test and the QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit are approved in the United States as well.

The QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is also CE marked for clinical use in the European Union.

Publications
Topics

Image by Difu Wu
CML cells

Health Canada has approved the use of two tests designed to detect BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)—the MRDx® BCR-ABL Test and the QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit.

MolecularMD’s MRDx® BCR-ABL Test is approved as an aid to monitor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML patients.

This test is also approved to identify CML patients in the chronic phase being treated with nilotinib who, after sustaining a deep molecular response of MR4.5, may be eligible to stop treatment and be monitored for treatment-free remission.

Asuragen, Inc.’s QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is approved for use in CML patients, regardless of whether they are taking a TKI or how their disease is being managed.

The kit is designed to detect and quantify major breakpoint (e13a2, e14a2) BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts for use in monitoring molecular response.

Both the MRDx® BCR-ABL Test and the QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit are approved in the United States as well.

The QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is also CE marked for clinical use in the European Union.

Image by Difu Wu
CML cells

Health Canada has approved the use of two tests designed to detect BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)—the MRDx® BCR-ABL Test and the QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit.

MolecularMD’s MRDx® BCR-ABL Test is approved as an aid to monitor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML patients.

This test is also approved to identify CML patients in the chronic phase being treated with nilotinib who, after sustaining a deep molecular response of MR4.5, may be eligible to stop treatment and be monitored for treatment-free remission.

Asuragen, Inc.’s QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is approved for use in CML patients, regardless of whether they are taking a TKI or how their disease is being managed.

The kit is designed to detect and quantify major breakpoint (e13a2, e14a2) BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts for use in monitoring molecular response.

Both the MRDx® BCR-ABL Test and the QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit are approved in the United States as well.

The QuantideX qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit is also CE marked for clinical use in the European Union.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Health Canada approves two tests for CML patients
Display Headline
Health Canada approves two tests for CML patients
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Preoperative anemia management saves blood, money

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 11/15/2018 - 00:01
Display Headline
Preoperative anemia management saves blood, money

Photo by Neil Osterweil
Christine M. Cahill

BOSTON—Results of a pilot program suggest preoperative management of anemia can reduce transfusion rates and cut costs, but the effect on patient outcomes isn’t clear.

For this program, anemic patients received dietary guidance and supplementation prior to surgery.

This increased day-of-surgery hemoglobin levels, reduced intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, and resulted in a cost savings of more than $100,000 over the life of the program.

Christine M. Cahill, BSN, MS, RN, of the University of Rochester and Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York, presented these results at AABB 2018 (abstract PBM4-ST4-22*).

“Anemia has been thought of as a relatively benign thing our patients live with, traditionally, but what we have been finding lately is that anemia is actually more serious than we once thought and is an independent risk factor for hospitalization, readmission, increased patient length of stay, loss of function, and diminished quality of life,” Cahill said.

She added that anemia also increases the likelihood that a patient will require transfusions.

The pilot program was implemented with this in mind. The program, which ran from February 2016 through September 2017, was designed to test the feasibility of diagnosing anemia during a cardiology consult visit and implementing an anemia management plan.

During the study period, 240 patients presenting for elective cardiac surgery were screened for anemia, and 58 were diagnosed as anemic (hemoglobin <12 g/dL). These patients were referred for anemia workups, which showed that 33 patients had iron-deficiency anemia, and 25 had anemia from other causes.

Preoperative anemia management for the iron-deficient patients included oral iron for seven patients, intravenous (IV) iron with or without folate for 20 patients, and oral folate with or without vitamin B12 for five patients. One iron-deficient patient could not have surgery delayed for anemia management.

Of the iron-replete patients, one received oral iron, 17 received folate with or without B12, and seven patients were not treated for anemia.

One iron-deficient patient had a reaction to the infusion and did not receive a scheduled second dose due to the need for immediate surgery. A second patient scheduled for IV iron and folate broke an arm and therefore missed an IV infusion appointment. No other complications or reactions occurred.

Results

The researchers compared the 58 patients from the pilot program to control subjects—patients who underwent cardiac surgery from March through July 2015, matched by age, sex, and procedures.

The anemia management group received 10 red blood cell (RBC) units intraoperatively, compared to 68 intraoperative RBC units for controls. The total number of postoperative RBC units was 13 and 22, respectively.

The rate of RBC transfusions was 24% in the anemia management group and 60% in controls (P<0.0001). The average RBC units per patient was 0.4 and 2.07, respectively (P<0.0001).

Patients in the anemia management program also had significantly higher day-of-surgery hemoglobin than controls—11.01 and 10.16 g/dL, respectively (P<0.001).

The program provided an average per-patient savings in acquisition costs of $367.40, an average transfusion cost savings of $1,837, and a total cost savings of $106,546 over the life of the program.

The key to success of a similar program is “to make sure you do your homework,” Cahill said.

Specifically, she recommended feasibility studies, evaluation of the potential impact of infusions on the service, work flow analyses, and cost analyses. It’s also important to get high-level administrative support as well as buy-in from surgeons and patients, she added.

Future studies should include assessment of patient outcomes, safety, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, Cahill emphasized.

 

 

This study was internally funded. Cahill reported no conflicts of interest.

*The data in the presentation differ from the abstract.

Publications
Topics

Photo by Neil Osterweil
Christine M. Cahill

BOSTON—Results of a pilot program suggest preoperative management of anemia can reduce transfusion rates and cut costs, but the effect on patient outcomes isn’t clear.

For this program, anemic patients received dietary guidance and supplementation prior to surgery.

This increased day-of-surgery hemoglobin levels, reduced intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, and resulted in a cost savings of more than $100,000 over the life of the program.

Christine M. Cahill, BSN, MS, RN, of the University of Rochester and Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York, presented these results at AABB 2018 (abstract PBM4-ST4-22*).

“Anemia has been thought of as a relatively benign thing our patients live with, traditionally, but what we have been finding lately is that anemia is actually more serious than we once thought and is an independent risk factor for hospitalization, readmission, increased patient length of stay, loss of function, and diminished quality of life,” Cahill said.

She added that anemia also increases the likelihood that a patient will require transfusions.

The pilot program was implemented with this in mind. The program, which ran from February 2016 through September 2017, was designed to test the feasibility of diagnosing anemia during a cardiology consult visit and implementing an anemia management plan.

During the study period, 240 patients presenting for elective cardiac surgery were screened for anemia, and 58 were diagnosed as anemic (hemoglobin <12 g/dL). These patients were referred for anemia workups, which showed that 33 patients had iron-deficiency anemia, and 25 had anemia from other causes.

Preoperative anemia management for the iron-deficient patients included oral iron for seven patients, intravenous (IV) iron with or without folate for 20 patients, and oral folate with or without vitamin B12 for five patients. One iron-deficient patient could not have surgery delayed for anemia management.

Of the iron-replete patients, one received oral iron, 17 received folate with or without B12, and seven patients were not treated for anemia.

One iron-deficient patient had a reaction to the infusion and did not receive a scheduled second dose due to the need for immediate surgery. A second patient scheduled for IV iron and folate broke an arm and therefore missed an IV infusion appointment. No other complications or reactions occurred.

Results

The researchers compared the 58 patients from the pilot program to control subjects—patients who underwent cardiac surgery from March through July 2015, matched by age, sex, and procedures.

The anemia management group received 10 red blood cell (RBC) units intraoperatively, compared to 68 intraoperative RBC units for controls. The total number of postoperative RBC units was 13 and 22, respectively.

The rate of RBC transfusions was 24% in the anemia management group and 60% in controls (P<0.0001). The average RBC units per patient was 0.4 and 2.07, respectively (P<0.0001).

Patients in the anemia management program also had significantly higher day-of-surgery hemoglobin than controls—11.01 and 10.16 g/dL, respectively (P<0.001).

The program provided an average per-patient savings in acquisition costs of $367.40, an average transfusion cost savings of $1,837, and a total cost savings of $106,546 over the life of the program.

The key to success of a similar program is “to make sure you do your homework,” Cahill said.

Specifically, she recommended feasibility studies, evaluation of the potential impact of infusions on the service, work flow analyses, and cost analyses. It’s also important to get high-level administrative support as well as buy-in from surgeons and patients, she added.

Future studies should include assessment of patient outcomes, safety, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, Cahill emphasized.

 

 

This study was internally funded. Cahill reported no conflicts of interest.

*The data in the presentation differ from the abstract.

Photo by Neil Osterweil
Christine M. Cahill

BOSTON—Results of a pilot program suggest preoperative management of anemia can reduce transfusion rates and cut costs, but the effect on patient outcomes isn’t clear.

For this program, anemic patients received dietary guidance and supplementation prior to surgery.

This increased day-of-surgery hemoglobin levels, reduced intraoperative and postoperative transfusions, and resulted in a cost savings of more than $100,000 over the life of the program.

Christine M. Cahill, BSN, MS, RN, of the University of Rochester and Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester, New York, presented these results at AABB 2018 (abstract PBM4-ST4-22*).

“Anemia has been thought of as a relatively benign thing our patients live with, traditionally, but what we have been finding lately is that anemia is actually more serious than we once thought and is an independent risk factor for hospitalization, readmission, increased patient length of stay, loss of function, and diminished quality of life,” Cahill said.

She added that anemia also increases the likelihood that a patient will require transfusions.

The pilot program was implemented with this in mind. The program, which ran from February 2016 through September 2017, was designed to test the feasibility of diagnosing anemia during a cardiology consult visit and implementing an anemia management plan.

During the study period, 240 patients presenting for elective cardiac surgery were screened for anemia, and 58 were diagnosed as anemic (hemoglobin <12 g/dL). These patients were referred for anemia workups, which showed that 33 patients had iron-deficiency anemia, and 25 had anemia from other causes.

Preoperative anemia management for the iron-deficient patients included oral iron for seven patients, intravenous (IV) iron with or without folate for 20 patients, and oral folate with or without vitamin B12 for five patients. One iron-deficient patient could not have surgery delayed for anemia management.

Of the iron-replete patients, one received oral iron, 17 received folate with or without B12, and seven patients were not treated for anemia.

One iron-deficient patient had a reaction to the infusion and did not receive a scheduled second dose due to the need for immediate surgery. A second patient scheduled for IV iron and folate broke an arm and therefore missed an IV infusion appointment. No other complications or reactions occurred.

Results

The researchers compared the 58 patients from the pilot program to control subjects—patients who underwent cardiac surgery from March through July 2015, matched by age, sex, and procedures.

The anemia management group received 10 red blood cell (RBC) units intraoperatively, compared to 68 intraoperative RBC units for controls. The total number of postoperative RBC units was 13 and 22, respectively.

The rate of RBC transfusions was 24% in the anemia management group and 60% in controls (P<0.0001). The average RBC units per patient was 0.4 and 2.07, respectively (P<0.0001).

Patients in the anemia management program also had significantly higher day-of-surgery hemoglobin than controls—11.01 and 10.16 g/dL, respectively (P<0.001).

The program provided an average per-patient savings in acquisition costs of $367.40, an average transfusion cost savings of $1,837, and a total cost savings of $106,546 over the life of the program.

The key to success of a similar program is “to make sure you do your homework,” Cahill said.

Specifically, she recommended feasibility studies, evaluation of the potential impact of infusions on the service, work flow analyses, and cost analyses. It’s also important to get high-level administrative support as well as buy-in from surgeons and patients, she added.

Future studies should include assessment of patient outcomes, safety, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, Cahill emphasized.

 

 

This study was internally funded. Cahill reported no conflicts of interest.

*The data in the presentation differ from the abstract.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Preoperative anemia management saves blood, money
Display Headline
Preoperative anemia management saves blood, money
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Multiple growths on face

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 10:44
Display Headline
Multiple growths on face

Figure 1

Multiple growths on face

While the differential diagnosis for these lesions (FIGURE 1A) included basal cell carcinoma, the FP had reason to suspect that these papules were actually sebaceous hyperplasia.

The FP saw a pattern of crown-like vessels and popcorn-like structures (FIGURE 1B) when he examined the patient with his dermatoscope. None of the vessels crossed the midline, and the popcorn-like structures were hyperplastic sebaceous glands. The FP photographed the largest lesion with a dermatoscope attached to his smart phone and showed the reassuring pattern to the anxious patient. He explained to her why this was not skin cancer and how hyperplasia of sebaceous glands is often normal for aging facial skin. He also offered her treatment if she thought that the lesions were cosmetically unappealing.

The patient said that she would be grateful to have the largest lesion treated because it did bother her when she looked in the mirror. The FP treated this lesion using electrosurgery with a blunt tipped electrode, on a setting of 2.1, without anesthesia. He warned the patient before he applied the activated electrode to the skin, and the patient tolerated the procedure well. The sebaceous glands melted easily with the current. The result appeared gray and was expected to heal with minimal to no scarring. At a future visit, the patient said that she was happy with the result and asked if additional lesions could be treated with the same electrosurgical approach.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 67(11)
Publications
Topics
Sections

Figure 1

Multiple growths on face

While the differential diagnosis for these lesions (FIGURE 1A) included basal cell carcinoma, the FP had reason to suspect that these papules were actually sebaceous hyperplasia.

The FP saw a pattern of crown-like vessels and popcorn-like structures (FIGURE 1B) when he examined the patient with his dermatoscope. None of the vessels crossed the midline, and the popcorn-like structures were hyperplastic sebaceous glands. The FP photographed the largest lesion with a dermatoscope attached to his smart phone and showed the reassuring pattern to the anxious patient. He explained to her why this was not skin cancer and how hyperplasia of sebaceous glands is often normal for aging facial skin. He also offered her treatment if she thought that the lesions were cosmetically unappealing.

The patient said that she would be grateful to have the largest lesion treated because it did bother her when she looked in the mirror. The FP treated this lesion using electrosurgery with a blunt tipped electrode, on a setting of 2.1, without anesthesia. He warned the patient before he applied the activated electrode to the skin, and the patient tolerated the procedure well. The sebaceous glands melted easily with the current. The result appeared gray and was expected to heal with minimal to no scarring. At a future visit, the patient said that she was happy with the result and asked if additional lesions could be treated with the same electrosurgical approach.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Figure 1

Multiple growths on face

While the differential diagnosis for these lesions (FIGURE 1A) included basal cell carcinoma, the FP had reason to suspect that these papules were actually sebaceous hyperplasia.

The FP saw a pattern of crown-like vessels and popcorn-like structures (FIGURE 1B) when he examined the patient with his dermatoscope. None of the vessels crossed the midline, and the popcorn-like structures were hyperplastic sebaceous glands. The FP photographed the largest lesion with a dermatoscope attached to his smart phone and showed the reassuring pattern to the anxious patient. He explained to her why this was not skin cancer and how hyperplasia of sebaceous glands is often normal for aging facial skin. He also offered her treatment if she thought that the lesions were cosmetically unappealing.

The patient said that she would be grateful to have the largest lesion treated because it did bother her when she looked in the mirror. The FP treated this lesion using electrosurgery with a blunt tipped electrode, on a setting of 2.1, without anesthesia. He warned the patient before he applied the activated electrode to the skin, and the patient tolerated the procedure well. The sebaceous glands melted easily with the current. The result appeared gray and was expected to heal with minimal to no scarring. At a future visit, the patient said that she was happy with the result and asked if additional lesions could be treated with the same electrosurgical approach.

Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Karnes J, Usatine R. Basal cell carcinoma. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:989-998.

To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.

You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.

Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 67(11)
Issue
The Journal of Family Practice - 67(11)
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Display Headline
Multiple growths on face
Display Headline
Multiple growths on face
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Gate On Date
Wed, 11/07/2018 - 12:00
Un-Gate On Date
Wed, 11/07/2018 - 12:00
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Wed, 11/07/2018 - 12:00

ICYMI: Prednisone lowers IRIS risk in patients with HIV

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 12/04/2018 - 13:59

In patients with HIV, treatment with prednisone for 4 weeks after antiretroviral therapy initiation significantly reduced the risk of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). The results from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018 Nov 14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800762).

Janice Carr, CDC
This colorized scanning electron micrograph depicts gram-positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria.

A total of 240 patients were enrolled in the study, with a median age of 36 years; 60% were men, and 73% had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis. The median CD4 count of the patients was 49 cells/mcL and the median HIV type 1 RNA viral load was 5.5 log10 copies/mL. A total of 120 patients were assigned to each group, with 18 patients lost to follow-up or withdrawn. Tuberculosis-associated IRIS was diagnosed in 39 patients (32.5%) in the prednisone group and in 56 (46.7%) in the placebo group, yielding a relative IRIS risk of 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.96; P = .03), according to the researchers for the PredART (Preventing TB-IRIS in High-Risk Patients: a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prednisone) study team.

We covered this story before it was published in the journal. Find our coverage from the Conference on Retroviruses & Opportunistic Infections at the link below.

Publications
Topics
Sections

In patients with HIV, treatment with prednisone for 4 weeks after antiretroviral therapy initiation significantly reduced the risk of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). The results from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018 Nov 14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800762).

Janice Carr, CDC
This colorized scanning electron micrograph depicts gram-positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria.

A total of 240 patients were enrolled in the study, with a median age of 36 years; 60% were men, and 73% had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis. The median CD4 count of the patients was 49 cells/mcL and the median HIV type 1 RNA viral load was 5.5 log10 copies/mL. A total of 120 patients were assigned to each group, with 18 patients lost to follow-up or withdrawn. Tuberculosis-associated IRIS was diagnosed in 39 patients (32.5%) in the prednisone group and in 56 (46.7%) in the placebo group, yielding a relative IRIS risk of 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.96; P = .03), according to the researchers for the PredART (Preventing TB-IRIS in High-Risk Patients: a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prednisone) study team.

We covered this story before it was published in the journal. Find our coverage from the Conference on Retroviruses & Opportunistic Infections at the link below.

In patients with HIV, treatment with prednisone for 4 weeks after antiretroviral therapy initiation significantly reduced the risk of tuberculosis-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). The results from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018 Nov 14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800762).

Janice Carr, CDC
This colorized scanning electron micrograph depicts gram-positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteria.

A total of 240 patients were enrolled in the study, with a median age of 36 years; 60% were men, and 73% had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis. The median CD4 count of the patients was 49 cells/mcL and the median HIV type 1 RNA viral load was 5.5 log10 copies/mL. A total of 120 patients were assigned to each group, with 18 patients lost to follow-up or withdrawn. Tuberculosis-associated IRIS was diagnosed in 39 patients (32.5%) in the prednisone group and in 56 (46.7%) in the placebo group, yielding a relative IRIS risk of 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.96; P = .03), according to the researchers for the PredART (Preventing TB-IRIS in High-Risk Patients: a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Prednisone) study team.

We covered this story before it was published in the journal. Find our coverage from the Conference on Retroviruses & Opportunistic Infections at the link below.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Ganglion stimulation boosts cerebral blood flow, improves stroke outcomes

Article Type
Changed
Tue, 07/21/2020 - 14:18

 

– Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) using a small, implanted electrode for 5 days in patients who had just had an acute ischemic stroke led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the subset of patients with confirmed cortical involvement in a pivotal, sham-controlled trial.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News
Dr. Jeffrey L. Saver

SPG stimulation started within 24 hours of an acute ischemic stroke “reduced poststroke disability over the entire outcome range and increased the proportion of patients who were alive and independent 3 months after their stroke” in the subgroup with a confirmed cortical infarction (CCI), Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, said at the World Stroke Congress. Five days of SPG stimulation, done once daily starting within 24 hours of stroke onset, “enhances ipsilateral collateral blood flow” and may also stabilize the blood brain barrier, explained Dr. Saver, professor of neurology and director of the stroke center at the University of California, Los Angeles. The study included a prespecified primary endpoint analysis that focused exclusively on the CCI subgroup, 52% of the total enrolled population.

If the reported data result in Food and Drug Administration marketing approval for the system, Dr. Saver said that he anticipated “substantial uptake” of the strategy, which he tested in patients who had not undergone thrombectomy or thrombolysis treatment. In current U.S. practice, there is “a large group of patients with a missed opportunity for recanalization” who would be candidates for treatment with SPG stimulation, a treatment that appeared to provide benefits beyond current standard care, he said in an interview.

Ongoing studies are also testing whether SPG stimulation can benefit acute ischemic stroke patients who have already undergone treatment with thrombectomy or thrombolysis, he added. The same SPG stimulation device is additionally undergoing U.S. testing as a treatment for headache and has regulatory approval in the European Union for treating headache and migraine.

The ImpACT-24B (Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial, Effectiveness and Safety in a 24-Hour Window) trial involved 1,000 patients at 73 centers in 18 countries, including the United States. The investigators enrolled acute ischemic stroke patients 8-24 hours after stroke onset who had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 7-18.

Each patient received an implant of a short, thin metal electrode placed through the soft palate at the rear roof of the mouth, near the SPG. Neurologists primarily performed the implants in a procedure that had a “skin to skin” time of less than 5 minutes. Patients received either electrical stimulation or a sham stimulation through the electrode immediately after placement and then daily for the next 4 days. The investigators titrated the strength of the treatment stimulation in each patient to maximize its strength while maintaining patient comfort. Subsequent analysis of the results showed that the stronger the tolerated stimulation, the bigger the treatment effect in a clear dose-response pattern, Dr. Saver reported.

The study’s primary endpoint was improvement in the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days after the index stroke when measured against historical expectations. By this measure, the overall study cohort showed a small, statistically insignificant improvement in actively treated patients, compared with sham-treated patients. However, in the prespecified, coprimary endpoint cohort of patients with a CCI, active treatment resulted in 50% of patients having a better-than-expected 90-day outcome, compared with 40% of controls, a 48% relative improvement in this measure that met the prespecified definition of statistical significance. The results also showed about a 50% relative improvement in each of three secondary outcomes in the CCI cohort: the percentage of patients with a mRS score of 0-2 after 90 days, the percentage with a mRS score of 0-3 after 90 days, and average stroke-related quality of life at 90 days.

Dr. Saver also reported results of a meta-analysis that combined the results he reported from 520 patients with CCI with results from 87 CCI patients enrolled in the preceding pilot study of this treatment strategy, ImpACT-1. The pilot findings were completely consistent and when combined with the current results strengthened the statistical significance of the primary and secondary endpoints.

“There is a compelling story” of efficacy based on the study results, the dose-response relationship, and the meta-analysis results, Dr. Saver said. “I think it’s a very strong case.”

He also reported “no safety concerns” raised in the new study, with no serious adverse effects seen in or experienced by the patients on active treatment.

“The data are compelling” for safety and efficacy, for this novel approach for treating acute ischemic stroke, commented Pooja Khatri, MD, professor of neurology and director of the acute stroke program at the University of Cincinnati.

The study was sponsored by BrainsGate, the company developing the tested device. Dr. Saver has been a consultant to BrainsGate. Dr. Khatri has been a consultant to Biogen, Greenwich, Lumosa, and PTC Therapeutics.

 

SOURCE: Saver J et al. Int J. Stroke. 2018 Oct;13(2S):28, Abstract 104.

Meeting/Event
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 27(1)a
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) using a small, implanted electrode for 5 days in patients who had just had an acute ischemic stroke led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the subset of patients with confirmed cortical involvement in a pivotal, sham-controlled trial.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News
Dr. Jeffrey L. Saver

SPG stimulation started within 24 hours of an acute ischemic stroke “reduced poststroke disability over the entire outcome range and increased the proportion of patients who were alive and independent 3 months after their stroke” in the subgroup with a confirmed cortical infarction (CCI), Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, said at the World Stroke Congress. Five days of SPG stimulation, done once daily starting within 24 hours of stroke onset, “enhances ipsilateral collateral blood flow” and may also stabilize the blood brain barrier, explained Dr. Saver, professor of neurology and director of the stroke center at the University of California, Los Angeles. The study included a prespecified primary endpoint analysis that focused exclusively on the CCI subgroup, 52% of the total enrolled population.

If the reported data result in Food and Drug Administration marketing approval for the system, Dr. Saver said that he anticipated “substantial uptake” of the strategy, which he tested in patients who had not undergone thrombectomy or thrombolysis treatment. In current U.S. practice, there is “a large group of patients with a missed opportunity for recanalization” who would be candidates for treatment with SPG stimulation, a treatment that appeared to provide benefits beyond current standard care, he said in an interview.

Ongoing studies are also testing whether SPG stimulation can benefit acute ischemic stroke patients who have already undergone treatment with thrombectomy or thrombolysis, he added. The same SPG stimulation device is additionally undergoing U.S. testing as a treatment for headache and has regulatory approval in the European Union for treating headache and migraine.

The ImpACT-24B (Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial, Effectiveness and Safety in a 24-Hour Window) trial involved 1,000 patients at 73 centers in 18 countries, including the United States. The investigators enrolled acute ischemic stroke patients 8-24 hours after stroke onset who had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 7-18.

Each patient received an implant of a short, thin metal electrode placed through the soft palate at the rear roof of the mouth, near the SPG. Neurologists primarily performed the implants in a procedure that had a “skin to skin” time of less than 5 minutes. Patients received either electrical stimulation or a sham stimulation through the electrode immediately after placement and then daily for the next 4 days. The investigators titrated the strength of the treatment stimulation in each patient to maximize its strength while maintaining patient comfort. Subsequent analysis of the results showed that the stronger the tolerated stimulation, the bigger the treatment effect in a clear dose-response pattern, Dr. Saver reported.

The study’s primary endpoint was improvement in the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days after the index stroke when measured against historical expectations. By this measure, the overall study cohort showed a small, statistically insignificant improvement in actively treated patients, compared with sham-treated patients. However, in the prespecified, coprimary endpoint cohort of patients with a CCI, active treatment resulted in 50% of patients having a better-than-expected 90-day outcome, compared with 40% of controls, a 48% relative improvement in this measure that met the prespecified definition of statistical significance. The results also showed about a 50% relative improvement in each of three secondary outcomes in the CCI cohort: the percentage of patients with a mRS score of 0-2 after 90 days, the percentage with a mRS score of 0-3 after 90 days, and average stroke-related quality of life at 90 days.

Dr. Saver also reported results of a meta-analysis that combined the results he reported from 520 patients with CCI with results from 87 CCI patients enrolled in the preceding pilot study of this treatment strategy, ImpACT-1. The pilot findings were completely consistent and when combined with the current results strengthened the statistical significance of the primary and secondary endpoints.

“There is a compelling story” of efficacy based on the study results, the dose-response relationship, and the meta-analysis results, Dr. Saver said. “I think it’s a very strong case.”

He also reported “no safety concerns” raised in the new study, with no serious adverse effects seen in or experienced by the patients on active treatment.

“The data are compelling” for safety and efficacy, for this novel approach for treating acute ischemic stroke, commented Pooja Khatri, MD, professor of neurology and director of the acute stroke program at the University of Cincinnati.

The study was sponsored by BrainsGate, the company developing the tested device. Dr. Saver has been a consultant to BrainsGate. Dr. Khatri has been a consultant to Biogen, Greenwich, Lumosa, and PTC Therapeutics.

 

SOURCE: Saver J et al. Int J. Stroke. 2018 Oct;13(2S):28, Abstract 104.

 

– Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) using a small, implanted electrode for 5 days in patients who had just had an acute ischemic stroke led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the subset of patients with confirmed cortical involvement in a pivotal, sham-controlled trial.

Mitchel L. Zoler/MDedge News
Dr. Jeffrey L. Saver

SPG stimulation started within 24 hours of an acute ischemic stroke “reduced poststroke disability over the entire outcome range and increased the proportion of patients who were alive and independent 3 months after their stroke” in the subgroup with a confirmed cortical infarction (CCI), Jeffrey L. Saver, MD, said at the World Stroke Congress. Five days of SPG stimulation, done once daily starting within 24 hours of stroke onset, “enhances ipsilateral collateral blood flow” and may also stabilize the blood brain barrier, explained Dr. Saver, professor of neurology and director of the stroke center at the University of California, Los Angeles. The study included a prespecified primary endpoint analysis that focused exclusively on the CCI subgroup, 52% of the total enrolled population.

If the reported data result in Food and Drug Administration marketing approval for the system, Dr. Saver said that he anticipated “substantial uptake” of the strategy, which he tested in patients who had not undergone thrombectomy or thrombolysis treatment. In current U.S. practice, there is “a large group of patients with a missed opportunity for recanalization” who would be candidates for treatment with SPG stimulation, a treatment that appeared to provide benefits beyond current standard care, he said in an interview.

Ongoing studies are also testing whether SPG stimulation can benefit acute ischemic stroke patients who have already undergone treatment with thrombectomy or thrombolysis, he added. The same SPG stimulation device is additionally undergoing U.S. testing as a treatment for headache and has regulatory approval in the European Union for treating headache and migraine.

The ImpACT-24B (Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial, Effectiveness and Safety in a 24-Hour Window) trial involved 1,000 patients at 73 centers in 18 countries, including the United States. The investigators enrolled acute ischemic stroke patients 8-24 hours after stroke onset who had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 7-18.

Each patient received an implant of a short, thin metal electrode placed through the soft palate at the rear roof of the mouth, near the SPG. Neurologists primarily performed the implants in a procedure that had a “skin to skin” time of less than 5 minutes. Patients received either electrical stimulation or a sham stimulation through the electrode immediately after placement and then daily for the next 4 days. The investigators titrated the strength of the treatment stimulation in each patient to maximize its strength while maintaining patient comfort. Subsequent analysis of the results showed that the stronger the tolerated stimulation, the bigger the treatment effect in a clear dose-response pattern, Dr. Saver reported.

The study’s primary endpoint was improvement in the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at 90 days after the index stroke when measured against historical expectations. By this measure, the overall study cohort showed a small, statistically insignificant improvement in actively treated patients, compared with sham-treated patients. However, in the prespecified, coprimary endpoint cohort of patients with a CCI, active treatment resulted in 50% of patients having a better-than-expected 90-day outcome, compared with 40% of controls, a 48% relative improvement in this measure that met the prespecified definition of statistical significance. The results also showed about a 50% relative improvement in each of three secondary outcomes in the CCI cohort: the percentage of patients with a mRS score of 0-2 after 90 days, the percentage with a mRS score of 0-3 after 90 days, and average stroke-related quality of life at 90 days.

Dr. Saver also reported results of a meta-analysis that combined the results he reported from 520 patients with CCI with results from 87 CCI patients enrolled in the preceding pilot study of this treatment strategy, ImpACT-1. The pilot findings were completely consistent and when combined with the current results strengthened the statistical significance of the primary and secondary endpoints.

“There is a compelling story” of efficacy based on the study results, the dose-response relationship, and the meta-analysis results, Dr. Saver said. “I think it’s a very strong case.”

He also reported “no safety concerns” raised in the new study, with no serious adverse effects seen in or experienced by the patients on active treatment.

“The data are compelling” for safety and efficacy, for this novel approach for treating acute ischemic stroke, commented Pooja Khatri, MD, professor of neurology and director of the acute stroke program at the University of Cincinnati.

The study was sponsored by BrainsGate, the company developing the tested device. Dr. Saver has been a consultant to BrainsGate. Dr. Khatri has been a consultant to Biogen, Greenwich, Lumosa, and PTC Therapeutics.

 

SOURCE: Saver J et al. Int J. Stroke. 2018 Oct;13(2S):28, Abstract 104.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 27(1)a
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 27(1)a
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE WORLD STROKE CONGRESS

Citation Override
Publish date: November 14, 2018
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation of acute ischemic stroke patients boosted cerebral blood flow and improved 90-day outcomes in patients with confirmed cortical infarctions.

Major finding: For confirmed cortical infarctions ganglion stimulation led to a 48% higher rate of better-than-expected outcomes, compared with controls.

Study details: ImpACT-24B, a multicenter pivotal trial with 1,000 acute ischemic stroke patients.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by BrainsGate, the company developing the tested device. Dr. Saver has been a consultant to BrainsGate. Dr. Khatri has been a consultant to Biogen, Greenwich, Lumosa, and PTC Therapeutics.

Source: Saver J et al. Int J. Stroke. 2018 Oct;13(2S):28, Abstract 104.

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Tofacitinib impresses in first trial for dermatomyositis

Article Type
Changed
Mon, 01/14/2019 - 10:36

 

– Oral tofacitinib demonstrated strong clinical efficacy and good safety in the first-ever formal study of a Janus kinase inhibitor in patients with active, treatment-resistant dermatomyositis, Julie J. Paik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Dr. Julie J. Paik

Based upon the encouraging results of this small, open-label, proof-of-concept study, a larger randomized controlled trial is being planned, according to Dr. Paik, a rheumatologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

The study included 10 dermatomyositis patients enrolled at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Clinic. All had previously failed at least two steroid-sparing drugs and/or high-dose steroids. After first going off all steroid-sparing agents and being limited to a maximum of 20 mg/day of prednisone, the participants were placed on 11 mg of open-label, extended-release tofacitinib (Xeljanz XR) once daily. Dr. Paik only reported results in 9 patients because the 10th hadn’t yet reached the 12-week mark.

The primary outcome was the rate of achievement of significant improvement at week 12 as defined using the validated International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) criteria, which require at least a 20% improvement in three of six core set measures coupled with no more than two measures worsening by 25% or more. By this standard, all nine patients met the primary endpoint. Five were rated as showing moderate improvement, and the other four demonstrated minimal improvement, based on the Total Improvement Score of the Myositis Response criteria. The median Total Improvement Score was 40, indicative of at least moderate improvement.

The mean CDASI (Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index) activity score – a key secondary endpoint – improved from 28 at baseline to 9.5 at week 12, which translates to a shift from moderate or severe disease to mild disease.

Levels of the alpha-chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, which are expressed in muscle affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as dermatomyositis, declined strongly over the course of 12 weeks of treatment to an extent that was just shy of statistical significance.



Myositis antibody titers didn’t change in response to tofacitinib therapy. Of note, six patients were positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma, and five of the six were moderate responders to JAK inhibitor therapy.

Four patients were on 20 mg/day of prednisone at baseline; three of the four were able to go off steroids altogether over the course of 12 weeks.

The treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.

Asked if she thought 11 mg/day of tofacitinib was the right dose for this population of refractory dermatomyositis patients, Dr. Paik replied, “We’re not sure we have the right dose. We had one patient who didn’t have as robust a response, and I really wonder, if we gave her a higher dose, it would have made a difference.”

Extended-release tofacitinib at 11 mg/day is the approved dose for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. However, 20 mg/day is approved for patients with ulcerative colitis, and Dr. Paik is lobbying for inclusion of a higher-dose arm in the randomized, controlled trial.

Prior to this formal proof-of-concept study, which was funded by Pfizer, the experience with tofacitinib in refractory dermatomyositis was limited to anecdotal case reports.

Dr. Paik reported having no financial conflicts.

SOURCE: Paik JJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract L02.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

– Oral tofacitinib demonstrated strong clinical efficacy and good safety in the first-ever formal study of a Janus kinase inhibitor in patients with active, treatment-resistant dermatomyositis, Julie J. Paik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Dr. Julie J. Paik

Based upon the encouraging results of this small, open-label, proof-of-concept study, a larger randomized controlled trial is being planned, according to Dr. Paik, a rheumatologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

The study included 10 dermatomyositis patients enrolled at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Clinic. All had previously failed at least two steroid-sparing drugs and/or high-dose steroids. After first going off all steroid-sparing agents and being limited to a maximum of 20 mg/day of prednisone, the participants were placed on 11 mg of open-label, extended-release tofacitinib (Xeljanz XR) once daily. Dr. Paik only reported results in 9 patients because the 10th hadn’t yet reached the 12-week mark.

The primary outcome was the rate of achievement of significant improvement at week 12 as defined using the validated International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) criteria, which require at least a 20% improvement in three of six core set measures coupled with no more than two measures worsening by 25% or more. By this standard, all nine patients met the primary endpoint. Five were rated as showing moderate improvement, and the other four demonstrated minimal improvement, based on the Total Improvement Score of the Myositis Response criteria. The median Total Improvement Score was 40, indicative of at least moderate improvement.

The mean CDASI (Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index) activity score – a key secondary endpoint – improved from 28 at baseline to 9.5 at week 12, which translates to a shift from moderate or severe disease to mild disease.

Levels of the alpha-chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, which are expressed in muscle affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as dermatomyositis, declined strongly over the course of 12 weeks of treatment to an extent that was just shy of statistical significance.



Myositis antibody titers didn’t change in response to tofacitinib therapy. Of note, six patients were positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma, and five of the six were moderate responders to JAK inhibitor therapy.

Four patients were on 20 mg/day of prednisone at baseline; three of the four were able to go off steroids altogether over the course of 12 weeks.

The treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.

Asked if she thought 11 mg/day of tofacitinib was the right dose for this population of refractory dermatomyositis patients, Dr. Paik replied, “We’re not sure we have the right dose. We had one patient who didn’t have as robust a response, and I really wonder, if we gave her a higher dose, it would have made a difference.”

Extended-release tofacitinib at 11 mg/day is the approved dose for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. However, 20 mg/day is approved for patients with ulcerative colitis, and Dr. Paik is lobbying for inclusion of a higher-dose arm in the randomized, controlled trial.

Prior to this formal proof-of-concept study, which was funded by Pfizer, the experience with tofacitinib in refractory dermatomyositis was limited to anecdotal case reports.

Dr. Paik reported having no financial conflicts.

SOURCE: Paik JJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract L02.

 

– Oral tofacitinib demonstrated strong clinical efficacy and good safety in the first-ever formal study of a Janus kinase inhibitor in patients with active, treatment-resistant dermatomyositis, Julie J. Paik, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Rheumatology.

Dr. Julie J. Paik

Based upon the encouraging results of this small, open-label, proof-of-concept study, a larger randomized controlled trial is being planned, according to Dr. Paik, a rheumatologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

The study included 10 dermatomyositis patients enrolled at the Johns Hopkins Myositis Clinic. All had previously failed at least two steroid-sparing drugs and/or high-dose steroids. After first going off all steroid-sparing agents and being limited to a maximum of 20 mg/day of prednisone, the participants were placed on 11 mg of open-label, extended-release tofacitinib (Xeljanz XR) once daily. Dr. Paik only reported results in 9 patients because the 10th hadn’t yet reached the 12-week mark.

The primary outcome was the rate of achievement of significant improvement at week 12 as defined using the validated International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) criteria, which require at least a 20% improvement in three of six core set measures coupled with no more than two measures worsening by 25% or more. By this standard, all nine patients met the primary endpoint. Five were rated as showing moderate improvement, and the other four demonstrated minimal improvement, based on the Total Improvement Score of the Myositis Response criteria. The median Total Improvement Score was 40, indicative of at least moderate improvement.

The mean CDASI (Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index) activity score – a key secondary endpoint – improved from 28 at baseline to 9.5 at week 12, which translates to a shift from moderate or severe disease to mild disease.

Levels of the alpha-chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10, which are expressed in muscle affected by idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as dermatomyositis, declined strongly over the course of 12 weeks of treatment to an extent that was just shy of statistical significance.



Myositis antibody titers didn’t change in response to tofacitinib therapy. Of note, six patients were positive for antitranscriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma, and five of the six were moderate responders to JAK inhibitor therapy.

Four patients were on 20 mg/day of prednisone at baseline; three of the four were able to go off steroids altogether over the course of 12 weeks.

The treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events.

Asked if she thought 11 mg/day of tofacitinib was the right dose for this population of refractory dermatomyositis patients, Dr. Paik replied, “We’re not sure we have the right dose. We had one patient who didn’t have as robust a response, and I really wonder, if we gave her a higher dose, it would have made a difference.”

Extended-release tofacitinib at 11 mg/day is the approved dose for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. However, 20 mg/day is approved for patients with ulcerative colitis, and Dr. Paik is lobbying for inclusion of a higher-dose arm in the randomized, controlled trial.

Prior to this formal proof-of-concept study, which was funded by Pfizer, the experience with tofacitinib in refractory dermatomyositis was limited to anecdotal case reports.

Dr. Paik reported having no financial conflicts.

SOURCE: Paik JJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract L02.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

REPORTING FROM THE ACR ANNUAL MEETING

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: The future looks promising for tofacitinib as a treatment for refractory dermatomyositis.

Major finding: Among patients with refractory dermatomyositis, the mean Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index activity score improved from 28 at baseline to 9.5 after 12 weeks on oral tofacitinib.

Study details: This first-in-class, open-label, 12-week study included 10 patients with refractory dermatomyositis placed on extended-release tofacitinib at 11 mg once daily.

Disclosures: The presenter reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, sponsored by Pfizer.

Source: Paik JJ et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(Suppl 10): Abstract L02

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Assess ADHD at developmental age, rather than chronological

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 18:07

 

You should assess inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive type ADHD based on a patient’s developmental age rather than their biological age, said David O. Childers, MD, chief of the division of developmental pediatrics at the University of Florida in Jacksonville.

shironosov/Getty Images

“That is a huge consideration, and the vast majority of pediatricians don’t understand that,” Dr. Childers said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

A diagnosis of ADHD in children should be reserved for situations in which the symptoms clearly interfere with how they function in social, academic, and occupational settings. ADHD should not be diagnosed in children who exhibit hostility, defiance, a failure to understand, or who have oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). In addition, ADHD in children often overlaps with other conditions, such as learning disabilities, ODD, anxiety, depression, poor self-esteem, conduct disorder, motor coordination problems, and encopresis and enuresis.

One mistake you can make is starting the medication too young in patients who exhibit symptoms of ADHD. Receptive language relative to developmental age should be taken into consideration when deciding whether to treat very young patients. “If the voice in your head is at a 3-year-old level, that’s going to be your behavior picture regardless of your chronological age,” Dr. Childers said.

You also can misdiagnose ADHD in young patients because you don’t recognize behavioral phenotypes and diagnoses that are similar to ADHD. Extreme prematurity, global developmental delay, fetal alcohol syndrome, spina bifida, genetic syndrome, intellectual and learning disabilities, closed head injuries, and depression all can mimic ADHD symptoms. “Everything that wheezes is not asthma, and everything that is ‘hyper’ or ‘drifty’ is not ADHD,” he noted.

Another mistake is considering mixed amphetamine salts (MAS) the same as methylphenidate (MPH), Dr. Childers said. MAS has 5 mg of active isomer versus 2.5 mg in MPH doses, and patients could see side effects from the increased potency in MAS in the form of appetite suppression and tics. You should start with a low dose of the medication and titrate up until patients get the most out of the medication to avoid situations in which patients report a change in personality or that the treatment is not effective.

“The medicine should never change a kid’s personality,” Dr. Childers said. “We are not here to treat the kid to the point of hyperactivity management; we’re here to treat for attention.”

In cases where patients ask for the short-acting medication rather than long-acting stimulant, remember that short-acting medication for ADHD has a higher potential for abuse. “Medication diversion is real. It does occur,” he said.

Establishing a basal sleep history and whether the child has insomnia is important before prescribing ADHD medication. Dr. Childers noted he uses a short-acting stimulant as an off-label treatment to treat some of his patients with insomnia, but he said to be aware of side effects like headache, abdominal pain, anorexia, and tics, as well as cardiac issues.

You also should rethink your diagnosis if the medication is not having an effect after two trials of a stimulant, Dr. Childers noted, and when a child has conditions like anxiety and depression that can mimic ADHD symptoms, a stimulant will increase irritability and have a paradoxical response to the medication. Inattentive ADHD can be missed in adolescent patients who struggle academically until they fall behind their peers, which can result in developing depression that complicates treatment, he said.

A learning disorder also can be mistaken for ADHD in children and presents in different ways depending on what grade the child is in. As a child ages and learns how to read, he or she will begin to fall behind as learning through reading becomes more complex. Learning disorders should be ruled out before treating for ADHD because, if the child improves after taking a stimulant, it could be more difficult to find a diagnosis of learning disorder later, Dr. Childers noted.

Bipolar disorder can be overdiagnosed in children; in these patients, the most likely diagnoses are ADHD and ODD, he said. According to a 2004 National Alliance of Mental Illness fact sheet, approximately 7% of patients in caseloads for federally funded studies in psychiatric facilities met the criteria for bipolar disorder, but the lifelong prevalence of the disease is between 1% and 1.6%.

“Bipolar disorder is frequently oppositional defiant disorder, and the word ‘no’ can be a trigger,” Dr. Childers said.

Dr. Childers reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

Meeting/Event
Publications
Topics
Sections
Meeting/Event
Meeting/Event

 

You should assess inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive type ADHD based on a patient’s developmental age rather than their biological age, said David O. Childers, MD, chief of the division of developmental pediatrics at the University of Florida in Jacksonville.

shironosov/Getty Images

“That is a huge consideration, and the vast majority of pediatricians don’t understand that,” Dr. Childers said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

A diagnosis of ADHD in children should be reserved for situations in which the symptoms clearly interfere with how they function in social, academic, and occupational settings. ADHD should not be diagnosed in children who exhibit hostility, defiance, a failure to understand, or who have oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). In addition, ADHD in children often overlaps with other conditions, such as learning disabilities, ODD, anxiety, depression, poor self-esteem, conduct disorder, motor coordination problems, and encopresis and enuresis.

One mistake you can make is starting the medication too young in patients who exhibit symptoms of ADHD. Receptive language relative to developmental age should be taken into consideration when deciding whether to treat very young patients. “If the voice in your head is at a 3-year-old level, that’s going to be your behavior picture regardless of your chronological age,” Dr. Childers said.

You also can misdiagnose ADHD in young patients because you don’t recognize behavioral phenotypes and diagnoses that are similar to ADHD. Extreme prematurity, global developmental delay, fetal alcohol syndrome, spina bifida, genetic syndrome, intellectual and learning disabilities, closed head injuries, and depression all can mimic ADHD symptoms. “Everything that wheezes is not asthma, and everything that is ‘hyper’ or ‘drifty’ is not ADHD,” he noted.

Another mistake is considering mixed amphetamine salts (MAS) the same as methylphenidate (MPH), Dr. Childers said. MAS has 5 mg of active isomer versus 2.5 mg in MPH doses, and patients could see side effects from the increased potency in MAS in the form of appetite suppression and tics. You should start with a low dose of the medication and titrate up until patients get the most out of the medication to avoid situations in which patients report a change in personality or that the treatment is not effective.

“The medicine should never change a kid’s personality,” Dr. Childers said. “We are not here to treat the kid to the point of hyperactivity management; we’re here to treat for attention.”

In cases where patients ask for the short-acting medication rather than long-acting stimulant, remember that short-acting medication for ADHD has a higher potential for abuse. “Medication diversion is real. It does occur,” he said.

Establishing a basal sleep history and whether the child has insomnia is important before prescribing ADHD medication. Dr. Childers noted he uses a short-acting stimulant as an off-label treatment to treat some of his patients with insomnia, but he said to be aware of side effects like headache, abdominal pain, anorexia, and tics, as well as cardiac issues.

You also should rethink your diagnosis if the medication is not having an effect after two trials of a stimulant, Dr. Childers noted, and when a child has conditions like anxiety and depression that can mimic ADHD symptoms, a stimulant will increase irritability and have a paradoxical response to the medication. Inattentive ADHD can be missed in adolescent patients who struggle academically until they fall behind their peers, which can result in developing depression that complicates treatment, he said.

A learning disorder also can be mistaken for ADHD in children and presents in different ways depending on what grade the child is in. As a child ages and learns how to read, he or she will begin to fall behind as learning through reading becomes more complex. Learning disorders should be ruled out before treating for ADHD because, if the child improves after taking a stimulant, it could be more difficult to find a diagnosis of learning disorder later, Dr. Childers noted.

Bipolar disorder can be overdiagnosed in children; in these patients, the most likely diagnoses are ADHD and ODD, he said. According to a 2004 National Alliance of Mental Illness fact sheet, approximately 7% of patients in caseloads for federally funded studies in psychiatric facilities met the criteria for bipolar disorder, but the lifelong prevalence of the disease is between 1% and 1.6%.

“Bipolar disorder is frequently oppositional defiant disorder, and the word ‘no’ can be a trigger,” Dr. Childers said.

Dr. Childers reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

 

You should assess inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive type ADHD based on a patient’s developmental age rather than their biological age, said David O. Childers, MD, chief of the division of developmental pediatrics at the University of Florida in Jacksonville.

shironosov/Getty Images

“That is a huge consideration, and the vast majority of pediatricians don’t understand that,” Dr. Childers said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

A diagnosis of ADHD in children should be reserved for situations in which the symptoms clearly interfere with how they function in social, academic, and occupational settings. ADHD should not be diagnosed in children who exhibit hostility, defiance, a failure to understand, or who have oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). In addition, ADHD in children often overlaps with other conditions, such as learning disabilities, ODD, anxiety, depression, poor self-esteem, conduct disorder, motor coordination problems, and encopresis and enuresis.

One mistake you can make is starting the medication too young in patients who exhibit symptoms of ADHD. Receptive language relative to developmental age should be taken into consideration when deciding whether to treat very young patients. “If the voice in your head is at a 3-year-old level, that’s going to be your behavior picture regardless of your chronological age,” Dr. Childers said.

You also can misdiagnose ADHD in young patients because you don’t recognize behavioral phenotypes and diagnoses that are similar to ADHD. Extreme prematurity, global developmental delay, fetal alcohol syndrome, spina bifida, genetic syndrome, intellectual and learning disabilities, closed head injuries, and depression all can mimic ADHD symptoms. “Everything that wheezes is not asthma, and everything that is ‘hyper’ or ‘drifty’ is not ADHD,” he noted.

Another mistake is considering mixed amphetamine salts (MAS) the same as methylphenidate (MPH), Dr. Childers said. MAS has 5 mg of active isomer versus 2.5 mg in MPH doses, and patients could see side effects from the increased potency in MAS in the form of appetite suppression and tics. You should start with a low dose of the medication and titrate up until patients get the most out of the medication to avoid situations in which patients report a change in personality or that the treatment is not effective.

“The medicine should never change a kid’s personality,” Dr. Childers said. “We are not here to treat the kid to the point of hyperactivity management; we’re here to treat for attention.”

In cases where patients ask for the short-acting medication rather than long-acting stimulant, remember that short-acting medication for ADHD has a higher potential for abuse. “Medication diversion is real. It does occur,” he said.

Establishing a basal sleep history and whether the child has insomnia is important before prescribing ADHD medication. Dr. Childers noted he uses a short-acting stimulant as an off-label treatment to treat some of his patients with insomnia, but he said to be aware of side effects like headache, abdominal pain, anorexia, and tics, as well as cardiac issues.

You also should rethink your diagnosis if the medication is not having an effect after two trials of a stimulant, Dr. Childers noted, and when a child has conditions like anxiety and depression that can mimic ADHD symptoms, a stimulant will increase irritability and have a paradoxical response to the medication. Inattentive ADHD can be missed in adolescent patients who struggle academically until they fall behind their peers, which can result in developing depression that complicates treatment, he said.

A learning disorder also can be mistaken for ADHD in children and presents in different ways depending on what grade the child is in. As a child ages and learns how to read, he or she will begin to fall behind as learning through reading becomes more complex. Learning disorders should be ruled out before treating for ADHD because, if the child improves after taking a stimulant, it could be more difficult to find a diagnosis of learning disorder later, Dr. Childers noted.

Bipolar disorder can be overdiagnosed in children; in these patients, the most likely diagnoses are ADHD and ODD, he said. According to a 2004 National Alliance of Mental Illness fact sheet, approximately 7% of patients in caseloads for federally funded studies in psychiatric facilities met the criteria for bipolar disorder, but the lifelong prevalence of the disease is between 1% and 1.6%.

“Bipolar disorder is frequently oppositional defiant disorder, and the word ‘no’ can be a trigger,” Dr. Childers said.

Dr. Childers reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Active
Sections
Article Source

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AAP 18

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
CME ID
184565
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Necrotizing lunchitis, pneumonia throwdown, global gamete warming

Article Type
Changed
Fri, 01/18/2019 - 18:07

 

Global gamete warming

Apparently, increasing deadly wildfires, hurricanes, and global famine aren’t enough. Turns out, climate change has found yet another way to harm its arch nemeses, a.k.a. every single species on the planet. A study originally published in Nature Communications found that rising temperatures also have a significant effect on male (but not female) fertility. Men: so fragile.

Eraxion/thinkstockphotos

Testing fertility in flour beetles, researchers concluded that successive heat waves of 5-7° C above normal for 5 days reduced sperm competitiveness and practically sterilized the males. Inseminated sperm inside females were also not spared the devastating effects of the heat-wave conditions. And, as the icing on the cake, reduced fertility persisted amongst later generations.

Unless we can figure out how robot sperm can deliver DNA, we’re in trouble.
 

Pneumonia throwdown

Previously, we pitted Clostridium difficile against cockroaches in a battle of toughness. In this week’s edition of Bacteria vs. the World, bacterial pneumonia goes up against another worthy adversary, viral pneumonia.

frender/Getty Images

“We’ve always known pneumonia was a risk factor for a major adverse cardiac event,” said J. Brent Muhlestein, MD, of Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City. “What we didn’t know was which type of pneumonia was more dangerous.”

To find out, he and his associates followed almost 4,800 patients hospitalized with pneumonia and tracked nonfatal heart attacks, stroke, heart failure, or death. Data they presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions in Chicago show that 34% of patients with bacterial pneumonia had a major cardiovascular event within 90 days, compared with 26% of those diagnosed with viral pneumonia. It is likely “that bacterial pneumonia causes greater inflammation of the arteries compared to viral pneumonia,” Dr. Muhlestein said.

So the bacteria stay undefeated, and somewhere Chuck Norris, who will never have a heart attack – even a heart isn’t foolish enough to attack Chuck Norris – is smiling.
 

Ch-ch-check it out

Drop the beat! Researchers at the University of California were interested in examining beatboxing processes to explore how the human mind works.

Paolo Paradiso/Getty Images

These crazy scientists threw some beatboxers into an MRI for an exclusive performance and studied the movements of their mouth and tongue. Researchers hypothesized that beatboxers base their sounds on already-known speech. But they discovered that these talented virtuosos are creating a whole new language.

“They’re coming up with ways to create these really complex acrobatic sounds by taking approaches drawn from different parts of the mouth that they don’t use in any language, and nobody uses for any language,” according to the lead researcher.

Does that mean beatboxing will be taught in schools as a foreign language? Perhaps. It might be more useful than learning Latin.
 

Keloid castration

Keloids – those pesky overgrowths of scar tissue – can be mighty hard to treat.

Prompilove/Getty Images

“Virtually every patient says, ‘I want this cut off – I want it gone,’ ” dermatologist Hilary E. Baldwin, MD, said in a presentation at the recent Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar. She responds to patients with reality checks about what’s actually possible in keloid treatment.

But sometimes, they just want to adjust the appearance of their keloids. Like the man who complained that “my keloid looks like my junk.” Dr. Baldwin took a look and had to agree – the keloid on his deltoid was the spitting image of male genitalia. She treated the keloid with the equivalent of castration (removing its “testicles” via surgery) and circumcision of sorts (flattening its “glans penis” via corticosteroids).

“It didn’t look pretty,” she said, as at least one male member of the audience squirmed, “but it no longer looked offensive to him.”
 

 

 

‘Necrotizing lunchitis’

Here at the Bureau of Livin’ on the MDedge, we pride ourselves on having the best words. And being University of Michigan graduates. So, the pain is Likert-scale 10 when Big Ten rivals have better words – and worse office fridges.

shaunl/gettyimages

Exhibit A: the operative report surgical-taped to a Penn State University call room refrigerator, which general surgery resident and American hero Dr. Cassie Sonntag shared on Twitter. The 18-cubic-foot communal Kenmore’s diagnosis? “Necrotizing lunchitis.”

The grave condition called for immediate intervention by surgeon “Whitt,” with assistance from circulating nurse “Liu.” The surgical team performed “debridement of the upper, middle, and lower compartments of the call room refrigerator with extension into the fridge door, disarticulation and washout of the lower chamber, explantation of necrotic lunches of varying ages.” Complications? “Multiple never-before-seen species of mold casually exterminated.” The patient’s postprocedure condition is “guarded.” The complete report is well worth your review. Even if the Sears appliance’s specimens were “refused by path.”

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Global gamete warming

Apparently, increasing deadly wildfires, hurricanes, and global famine aren’t enough. Turns out, climate change has found yet another way to harm its arch nemeses, a.k.a. every single species on the planet. A study originally published in Nature Communications found that rising temperatures also have a significant effect on male (but not female) fertility. Men: so fragile.

Eraxion/thinkstockphotos

Testing fertility in flour beetles, researchers concluded that successive heat waves of 5-7° C above normal for 5 days reduced sperm competitiveness and practically sterilized the males. Inseminated sperm inside females were also not spared the devastating effects of the heat-wave conditions. And, as the icing on the cake, reduced fertility persisted amongst later generations.

Unless we can figure out how robot sperm can deliver DNA, we’re in trouble.
 

Pneumonia throwdown

Previously, we pitted Clostridium difficile against cockroaches in a battle of toughness. In this week’s edition of Bacteria vs. the World, bacterial pneumonia goes up against another worthy adversary, viral pneumonia.

frender/Getty Images

“We’ve always known pneumonia was a risk factor for a major adverse cardiac event,” said J. Brent Muhlestein, MD, of Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City. “What we didn’t know was which type of pneumonia was more dangerous.”

To find out, he and his associates followed almost 4,800 patients hospitalized with pneumonia and tracked nonfatal heart attacks, stroke, heart failure, or death. Data they presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions in Chicago show that 34% of patients with bacterial pneumonia had a major cardiovascular event within 90 days, compared with 26% of those diagnosed with viral pneumonia. It is likely “that bacterial pneumonia causes greater inflammation of the arteries compared to viral pneumonia,” Dr. Muhlestein said.

So the bacteria stay undefeated, and somewhere Chuck Norris, who will never have a heart attack – even a heart isn’t foolish enough to attack Chuck Norris – is smiling.
 

Ch-ch-check it out

Drop the beat! Researchers at the University of California were interested in examining beatboxing processes to explore how the human mind works.

Paolo Paradiso/Getty Images

These crazy scientists threw some beatboxers into an MRI for an exclusive performance and studied the movements of their mouth and tongue. Researchers hypothesized that beatboxers base their sounds on already-known speech. But they discovered that these talented virtuosos are creating a whole new language.

“They’re coming up with ways to create these really complex acrobatic sounds by taking approaches drawn from different parts of the mouth that they don’t use in any language, and nobody uses for any language,” according to the lead researcher.

Does that mean beatboxing will be taught in schools as a foreign language? Perhaps. It might be more useful than learning Latin.
 

Keloid castration

Keloids – those pesky overgrowths of scar tissue – can be mighty hard to treat.

Prompilove/Getty Images

“Virtually every patient says, ‘I want this cut off – I want it gone,’ ” dermatologist Hilary E. Baldwin, MD, said in a presentation at the recent Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar. She responds to patients with reality checks about what’s actually possible in keloid treatment.

But sometimes, they just want to adjust the appearance of their keloids. Like the man who complained that “my keloid looks like my junk.” Dr. Baldwin took a look and had to agree – the keloid on his deltoid was the spitting image of male genitalia. She treated the keloid with the equivalent of castration (removing its “testicles” via surgery) and circumcision of sorts (flattening its “glans penis” via corticosteroids).

“It didn’t look pretty,” she said, as at least one male member of the audience squirmed, “but it no longer looked offensive to him.”
 

 

 

‘Necrotizing lunchitis’

Here at the Bureau of Livin’ on the MDedge, we pride ourselves on having the best words. And being University of Michigan graduates. So, the pain is Likert-scale 10 when Big Ten rivals have better words – and worse office fridges.

shaunl/gettyimages

Exhibit A: the operative report surgical-taped to a Penn State University call room refrigerator, which general surgery resident and American hero Dr. Cassie Sonntag shared on Twitter. The 18-cubic-foot communal Kenmore’s diagnosis? “Necrotizing lunchitis.”

The grave condition called for immediate intervention by surgeon “Whitt,” with assistance from circulating nurse “Liu.” The surgical team performed “debridement of the upper, middle, and lower compartments of the call room refrigerator with extension into the fridge door, disarticulation and washout of the lower chamber, explantation of necrotic lunches of varying ages.” Complications? “Multiple never-before-seen species of mold casually exterminated.” The patient’s postprocedure condition is “guarded.” The complete report is well worth your review. Even if the Sears appliance’s specimens were “refused by path.”

 

 

Global gamete warming

Apparently, increasing deadly wildfires, hurricanes, and global famine aren’t enough. Turns out, climate change has found yet another way to harm its arch nemeses, a.k.a. every single species on the planet. A study originally published in Nature Communications found that rising temperatures also have a significant effect on male (but not female) fertility. Men: so fragile.

Eraxion/thinkstockphotos

Testing fertility in flour beetles, researchers concluded that successive heat waves of 5-7° C above normal for 5 days reduced sperm competitiveness and practically sterilized the males. Inseminated sperm inside females were also not spared the devastating effects of the heat-wave conditions. And, as the icing on the cake, reduced fertility persisted amongst later generations.

Unless we can figure out how robot sperm can deliver DNA, we’re in trouble.
 

Pneumonia throwdown

Previously, we pitted Clostridium difficile against cockroaches in a battle of toughness. In this week’s edition of Bacteria vs. the World, bacterial pneumonia goes up against another worthy adversary, viral pneumonia.

frender/Getty Images

“We’ve always known pneumonia was a risk factor for a major adverse cardiac event,” said J. Brent Muhlestein, MD, of Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City. “What we didn’t know was which type of pneumonia was more dangerous.”

To find out, he and his associates followed almost 4,800 patients hospitalized with pneumonia and tracked nonfatal heart attacks, stroke, heart failure, or death. Data they presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions in Chicago show that 34% of patients with bacterial pneumonia had a major cardiovascular event within 90 days, compared with 26% of those diagnosed with viral pneumonia. It is likely “that bacterial pneumonia causes greater inflammation of the arteries compared to viral pneumonia,” Dr. Muhlestein said.

So the bacteria stay undefeated, and somewhere Chuck Norris, who will never have a heart attack – even a heart isn’t foolish enough to attack Chuck Norris – is smiling.
 

Ch-ch-check it out

Drop the beat! Researchers at the University of California were interested in examining beatboxing processes to explore how the human mind works.

Paolo Paradiso/Getty Images

These crazy scientists threw some beatboxers into an MRI for an exclusive performance and studied the movements of their mouth and tongue. Researchers hypothesized that beatboxers base their sounds on already-known speech. But they discovered that these talented virtuosos are creating a whole new language.

“They’re coming up with ways to create these really complex acrobatic sounds by taking approaches drawn from different parts of the mouth that they don’t use in any language, and nobody uses for any language,” according to the lead researcher.

Does that mean beatboxing will be taught in schools as a foreign language? Perhaps. It might be more useful than learning Latin.
 

Keloid castration

Keloids – those pesky overgrowths of scar tissue – can be mighty hard to treat.

Prompilove/Getty Images

“Virtually every patient says, ‘I want this cut off – I want it gone,’ ” dermatologist Hilary E. Baldwin, MD, said in a presentation at the recent Las Vegas Dermatology Seminar. She responds to patients with reality checks about what’s actually possible in keloid treatment.

But sometimes, they just want to adjust the appearance of their keloids. Like the man who complained that “my keloid looks like my junk.” Dr. Baldwin took a look and had to agree – the keloid on his deltoid was the spitting image of male genitalia. She treated the keloid with the equivalent of castration (removing its “testicles” via surgery) and circumcision of sorts (flattening its “glans penis” via corticosteroids).

“It didn’t look pretty,” she said, as at least one male member of the audience squirmed, “but it no longer looked offensive to him.”
 

 

 

‘Necrotizing lunchitis’

Here at the Bureau of Livin’ on the MDedge, we pride ourselves on having the best words. And being University of Michigan graduates. So, the pain is Likert-scale 10 when Big Ten rivals have better words – and worse office fridges.

shaunl/gettyimages

Exhibit A: the operative report surgical-taped to a Penn State University call room refrigerator, which general surgery resident and American hero Dr. Cassie Sonntag shared on Twitter. The 18-cubic-foot communal Kenmore’s diagnosis? “Necrotizing lunchitis.”

The grave condition called for immediate intervention by surgeon “Whitt,” with assistance from circulating nurse “Liu.” The surgical team performed “debridement of the upper, middle, and lower compartments of the call room refrigerator with extension into the fridge door, disarticulation and washout of the lower chamber, explantation of necrotic lunches of varying ages.” Complications? “Multiple never-before-seen species of mold casually exterminated.” The patient’s postprocedure condition is “guarded.” The complete report is well worth your review. Even if the Sears appliance’s specimens were “refused by path.”

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Increased risk of atrial fibrillation with migraine aura

Article Type
Changed
Thu, 12/15/2022 - 15:48

 

The presence of visual aura during migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, a study in Neurology has found.

Dr. Souvik Sen

Researchers reported an analysis of data from the longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, which included 11,939 individuals with no history of atrial fibrillation or stroke. Of these, 426 experienced migraines with visual aura, 1,090 experienced migraines without aura, 1,018 experienced nonmigraine headache, and 9,405 experienced no headache.

After adjustment for age and sex, individuals who had migraine with visual aura showed a significant 46% increase in the risk of incident atrial fibrillation when compared with those who experienced migraine without aura and a 39% increased risk when compared with individuals who did not experience headache (P = .004). After adjustment for risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.30 for migraineurs with aura, compared with people without headache. In addition, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.39 for migraineurs with aura, compared with migraineurs without aura.

In contrast, individuals who experienced migraines without aura did not show a significantly increased risk of atrial fibrillation.

“This finding has important clinical implications and may help us better understand the atrial fibrillation mediation of the migraine-stroke link,” wrote Souvik Sen, MD, MPH, a professor in the department of neurology at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, and his coauthors. “A randomized clinical trial may help ascertain whether patients with migraine with visual aura may benefit from atrial fibrillation detection and subsequent anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy as a primary stroke prevention strategy.”

The study also showed a significant interaction with age and sex. While men who experienced migraine with aura had an 89% higher risk of atrial fibrillation, women with aura showed no increase in risk, compared with individuals who experienced no headache. Similarly, only individuals aged 60 years or older who experienced migraine with aura showed an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, while those younger than 60 years did not.

The authors noted that previous case reports have recorded the incidence of atrial fibrillation during a migraine attack. Autonomic dysfunction influences the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and migraine.

“Cardiac arrhythmia recordings have been shown to be present in ECGs of patients while experiencing migraine headaches as compared with migraine-free phases,” they wrote. “This hypothesis is further supported by atrial fibrillation ablation procedures that have shown tendencies to reduce migraine symptoms and frequencies.”

In regard to the role that migraine aura played in this, they speculated as to whether migraine aura could be the result of cardioembolic stroke that might have occurred because of the atrial fibrillation.

Overall, 167 patients had incident cardioembolic strokes, and researchers suggested strokes in 87% of these cases could be attributed to the atrial fibrillation that came before the stroke.

The stroke incidence rate also was around twice as high in individuals who experienced migraine with aura, compared with those who experienced migraine without aura (4.1 per 1,000 person-years vs. 2.07 per 1,000 person-years).

The study authors acknowledged that patent foramen ovale, which was not assessed in ARIC, is a possible confounder. Previous studies have showed that patent foramen ovale is more common in younger individuals with migraine and particularly in patients who experience migraine with aura.

However, they also noted that trials of patent foramen ovale closures as a treatment for migraine have not shown success in reducing migraine frequency and, therefore, argued against patent foramen ovale as being a major confounder.

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.

This article was updated 12/12/18.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 27(1)a
Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The presence of visual aura during migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, a study in Neurology has found.

Dr. Souvik Sen

Researchers reported an analysis of data from the longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, which included 11,939 individuals with no history of atrial fibrillation or stroke. Of these, 426 experienced migraines with visual aura, 1,090 experienced migraines without aura, 1,018 experienced nonmigraine headache, and 9,405 experienced no headache.

After adjustment for age and sex, individuals who had migraine with visual aura showed a significant 46% increase in the risk of incident atrial fibrillation when compared with those who experienced migraine without aura and a 39% increased risk when compared with individuals who did not experience headache (P = .004). After adjustment for risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.30 for migraineurs with aura, compared with people without headache. In addition, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.39 for migraineurs with aura, compared with migraineurs without aura.

In contrast, individuals who experienced migraines without aura did not show a significantly increased risk of atrial fibrillation.

“This finding has important clinical implications and may help us better understand the atrial fibrillation mediation of the migraine-stroke link,” wrote Souvik Sen, MD, MPH, a professor in the department of neurology at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, and his coauthors. “A randomized clinical trial may help ascertain whether patients with migraine with visual aura may benefit from atrial fibrillation detection and subsequent anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy as a primary stroke prevention strategy.”

The study also showed a significant interaction with age and sex. While men who experienced migraine with aura had an 89% higher risk of atrial fibrillation, women with aura showed no increase in risk, compared with individuals who experienced no headache. Similarly, only individuals aged 60 years or older who experienced migraine with aura showed an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, while those younger than 60 years did not.

The authors noted that previous case reports have recorded the incidence of atrial fibrillation during a migraine attack. Autonomic dysfunction influences the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and migraine.

“Cardiac arrhythmia recordings have been shown to be present in ECGs of patients while experiencing migraine headaches as compared with migraine-free phases,” they wrote. “This hypothesis is further supported by atrial fibrillation ablation procedures that have shown tendencies to reduce migraine symptoms and frequencies.”

In regard to the role that migraine aura played in this, they speculated as to whether migraine aura could be the result of cardioembolic stroke that might have occurred because of the atrial fibrillation.

Overall, 167 patients had incident cardioembolic strokes, and researchers suggested strokes in 87% of these cases could be attributed to the atrial fibrillation that came before the stroke.

The stroke incidence rate also was around twice as high in individuals who experienced migraine with aura, compared with those who experienced migraine without aura (4.1 per 1,000 person-years vs. 2.07 per 1,000 person-years).

The study authors acknowledged that patent foramen ovale, which was not assessed in ARIC, is a possible confounder. Previous studies have showed that patent foramen ovale is more common in younger individuals with migraine and particularly in patients who experience migraine with aura.

However, they also noted that trials of patent foramen ovale closures as a treatment for migraine have not shown success in reducing migraine frequency and, therefore, argued against patent foramen ovale as being a major confounder.

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.

This article was updated 12/12/18.

 

The presence of visual aura during migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, a study in Neurology has found.

Dr. Souvik Sen

Researchers reported an analysis of data from the longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, which included 11,939 individuals with no history of atrial fibrillation or stroke. Of these, 426 experienced migraines with visual aura, 1,090 experienced migraines without aura, 1,018 experienced nonmigraine headache, and 9,405 experienced no headache.

After adjustment for age and sex, individuals who had migraine with visual aura showed a significant 46% increase in the risk of incident atrial fibrillation when compared with those who experienced migraine without aura and a 39% increased risk when compared with individuals who did not experience headache (P = .004). After adjustment for risk factors such as hypertension, smoking, coronary artery disease, and congestive heart failure, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.30 for migraineurs with aura, compared with people without headache. In addition, the hazard ratio of incident atrial fibrillation was 1.39 for migraineurs with aura, compared with migraineurs without aura.

In contrast, individuals who experienced migraines without aura did not show a significantly increased risk of atrial fibrillation.

“This finding has important clinical implications and may help us better understand the atrial fibrillation mediation of the migraine-stroke link,” wrote Souvik Sen, MD, MPH, a professor in the department of neurology at the University of South Carolina, Columbia, and his coauthors. “A randomized clinical trial may help ascertain whether patients with migraine with visual aura may benefit from atrial fibrillation detection and subsequent anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy as a primary stroke prevention strategy.”

The study also showed a significant interaction with age and sex. While men who experienced migraine with aura had an 89% higher risk of atrial fibrillation, women with aura showed no increase in risk, compared with individuals who experienced no headache. Similarly, only individuals aged 60 years or older who experienced migraine with aura showed an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, while those younger than 60 years did not.

The authors noted that previous case reports have recorded the incidence of atrial fibrillation during a migraine attack. Autonomic dysfunction influences the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation and migraine.

“Cardiac arrhythmia recordings have been shown to be present in ECGs of patients while experiencing migraine headaches as compared with migraine-free phases,” they wrote. “This hypothesis is further supported by atrial fibrillation ablation procedures that have shown tendencies to reduce migraine symptoms and frequencies.”

In regard to the role that migraine aura played in this, they speculated as to whether migraine aura could be the result of cardioembolic stroke that might have occurred because of the atrial fibrillation.

Overall, 167 patients had incident cardioembolic strokes, and researchers suggested strokes in 87% of these cases could be attributed to the atrial fibrillation that came before the stroke.

The stroke incidence rate also was around twice as high in individuals who experienced migraine with aura, compared with those who experienced migraine without aura (4.1 per 1,000 person-years vs. 2.07 per 1,000 person-years).

The study authors acknowledged that patent foramen ovale, which was not assessed in ARIC, is a possible confounder. Previous studies have showed that patent foramen ovale is more common in younger individuals with migraine and particularly in patients who experience migraine with aura.

However, they also noted that trials of patent foramen ovale closures as a treatment for migraine have not shown success in reducing migraine frequency and, therefore, argued against patent foramen ovale as being a major confounder.

The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

SOURCE: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.

This article was updated 12/12/18.

Issue
Neurology Reviews - 27(1)a
Issue
Neurology Reviews - 27(1)a
Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM NEUROLOGY

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Vitals

 

Key clinical point: Aura in migraine is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.

Major finding: Individuals who experience migraine with aura have a 39% higher risk of atrial fibrillation than do those without aura or without migraine.

Study details: The longitudinal, community-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study in 11,939 individuals.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the American Heart Association. One author declared grants from the National Institutes of health, one declared research support from Tian Medical, and one author is an associate editor for Neurology. No other conflicts of interest were declared.

Source: Sen S et al. Neurology. 2018;91:1-9.
 

Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica