The majority of adult cigarette smokers in the United States try to quit each year, but there was little change in the rate of quit attempts from 2011 to 2017, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The median percentage of adult smokers who tried to quit cigarettes over the past year went from 64.9% in 2011 to 65.4% in 2017, CDC investigators reported in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, but the rate has gone down since 2014, when it reached 66.9%.

“The limited progress in increasing quit attempts … together with the variation in quit attempt prevalence among states, underscores the importance of enhanced efforts to motivate and help smokers to quit,” wrote Kimp Walton, MS, of the CDC’s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and associates.

State-specific trends in quit-attempt rates reflected the national situation. The prevalence of past-year cessation attempts went up significantly in four states (Kansas, Louisiana, Virginia, and West Virginia) from 2011 to 2017, went down significantly in two states (New York and Tennessee), and did not change significantly in the other 44 states and the District of Columbia, they wrote.

In 2017, cigarette smokers in Connecticut were the most likely to have tried to quit in the past year, with a rate of 71.6%. The only other places with rates greater than 70% were Delaware, D.C., New Jersey, and Texas. The lowest quit-attempt rate that year, 58.6%, belonged to Wisconsin, with Iowa and Missouri the only other states under 60%, the investigators reported based on data from annual Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.


“Because most smokers make multiple quit attempts before succeeding, as many as 30 on average, tobacco dependence is viewed as a chronic, relapsing condition that requires repeated intervention. Smokers should be encouraged to keep trying to quit until they succeed, and health care providers should be encouraged to keep supporting smokers until they quit,” investigators wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Walton K et al. MMWR. 2019 Jul 19;68(28):621-6.

The majority of adult cigarette smokers in the United States try to quit each year, but there was little change in the rate of quit attempts from 2011 to 2017, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The median percentage of adult smokers who tried to quit cigarettes over the past year went from 64.9% in 2011 to 65.4% in 2017, CDC investigators reported in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, but the rate has gone down since 2014, when it reached 66.9%.

“The limited progress in increasing quit attempts … together with the variation in quit attempt prevalence among states, underscores the importance of enhanced efforts to motivate and help smokers to quit,” wrote Kimp Walton, MS, of the CDC’s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and associates.

State-specific trends in quit-attempt rates reflected the national situation. The prevalence of past-year cessation attempts went up significantly in four states (Kansas, Louisiana, Virginia, and West Virginia) from 2011 to 2017, went down significantly in two states (New York and Tennessee), and did not change significantly in the other 44 states and the District of Columbia, they wrote.

In 2017, cigarette smokers in Connecticut were the most likely to have tried to quit in the past year, with a rate of 71.6%. The only other places with rates greater than 70% were Delaware, D.C., New Jersey, and Texas. The lowest quit-attempt rate that year, 58.6%, belonged to Wisconsin, with Iowa and Missouri the only other states under 60%, the investigators reported based on data from annual Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.


“Because most smokers make multiple quit attempts before succeeding, as many as 30 on average, tobacco dependence is viewed as a chronic, relapsing condition that requires repeated intervention. Smokers should be encouraged to keep trying to quit until they succeed, and health care providers should be encouraged to keep supporting smokers until they quit,” investigators wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Walton K et al. MMWR. 2019 Jul 19;68(28):621-6.

The majority of adult cigarette smokers in the United States try to quit each year, but there was little change in the rate of quit attempts from 2011 to 2017, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The median percentage of adult smokers who tried to quit cigarettes over the past year went from 64.9% in 2011 to 65.4% in 2017, CDC investigators reported in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, but the rate has gone down since 2014, when it reached 66.9%.

“The limited progress in increasing quit attempts … together with the variation in quit attempt prevalence among states, underscores the importance of enhanced efforts to motivate and help smokers to quit,” wrote Kimp Walton, MS, of the CDC’s National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and associates.

State-specific trends in quit-attempt rates reflected the national situation. The prevalence of past-year cessation attempts went up significantly in four states (Kansas, Louisiana, Virginia, and West Virginia) from 2011 to 2017, went down significantly in two states (New York and Tennessee), and did not change significantly in the other 44 states and the District of Columbia, they wrote.

In 2017, cigarette smokers in Connecticut were the most likely to have tried to quit in the past year, with a rate of 71.6%. The only other places with rates greater than 70% were Delaware, D.C., New Jersey, and Texas. The lowest quit-attempt rate that year, 58.6%, belonged to Wisconsin, with Iowa and Missouri the only other states under 60%, the investigators reported based on data from annual Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.


“Because most smokers make multiple quit attempts before succeeding, as many as 30 on average, tobacco dependence is viewed as a chronic, relapsing condition that requires repeated intervention. Smokers should be encouraged to keep trying to quit until they succeed, and health care providers should be encouraged to keep supporting smokers until they quit,” investigators wrote.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Walton K et al. MMWR. 2019 Jul 19;68(28):621-6.

Background: Acute cystitis is a common condition in women and associated with morbidity. A commonly recommended preventative measure is increased oral hydration, but there is limited evidence to support this claim.

Though antibiotic prophylaxis is more effective at reducing cystitis, increased daily water intake is a safe and inexpensive method to prevent cystitis without increasing exposure to antimicrobial therapy. This study did rely on information obtained from phone calls with patients. It is also an open-label study design in which patients were not blinded to their assigned group. This would be less of an issue if episodes of cystitis were confirmed with culture. Another limitation of this study is that it included only ambulatory patients and excluded patients with pyelonephritis, so it may be less applicable to our hospitalized patients.

Bottom line: This study shows a benefit in recurrent cystitis by increased water intake in premenopausal women.

Citation: Hooton TM et al. Effect of increased daily water intake in premenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov;178(11):1509-15.

Dr. Astik is medical director, clinical documentation, at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a hospitalist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, both in Chicago.

Background: Acute cystitis is a common condition in women and associated with morbidity. A commonly recommended preventative measure is increased oral hydration, but there is limited evidence to support this claim.

Though antibiotic prophylaxis is more effective at reducing cystitis, increased daily water intake is a safe and inexpensive method to prevent cystitis without increasing exposure to antimicrobial therapy. This study did rely on information obtained from phone calls with patients. It is also an open-label study design in which patients were not blinded to their assigned group. This would be less of an issue if episodes of cystitis were confirmed with culture. Another limitation of this study is that it included only ambulatory patients and excluded patients with pyelonephritis, so it may be less applicable to our hospitalized patients.

Bottom line: This study shows a benefit in recurrent cystitis by increased water intake in premenopausal women.

Citation: Hooton TM et al. Effect of increased daily water intake in premenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov;178(11):1509-15.

Dr. Astik is medical director, clinical documentation, at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a hospitalist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, both in Chicago.

Background: Acute cystitis is a common condition in women and associated with morbidity. A commonly recommended preventative measure is increased oral hydration, but there is limited evidence to support this claim.

Though antibiotic prophylaxis is more effective at reducing cystitis, increased daily water intake is a safe and inexpensive method to prevent cystitis without increasing exposure to antimicrobial therapy. This study did rely on information obtained from phone calls with patients. It is also an open-label study design in which patients were not blinded to their assigned group. This would be less of an issue if episodes of cystitis were confirmed with culture. Another limitation of this study is that it included only ambulatory patients and excluded patients with pyelonephritis, so it may be less applicable to our hospitalized patients.

Bottom line: This study shows a benefit in recurrent cystitis by increased water intake in premenopausal women.

Citation: Hooton TM et al. Effect of increased daily water intake in premenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infections. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov;178(11):1509-15.

Dr. Astik is medical director, clinical documentation, at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and a hospitalist at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, both in Chicago.

The number of pregnancies among women taking isotretinoin has decreased since the introduction of the iPledge program, but pregnancy, abortions, and fetal defects associated with isotretinoin exposure are still occurring in women of reproductive age, according to a retrospective study published in JAMA Dermatology.

In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration implemented the iPledge program, with requirements that include women of childbearing age having a negative pregnancy test and evidence of using two forms of contraception monthly to use isotretinoin, a teratogen. “Although the number of pregnancy-related adverse events for patients taking isotretinoin has decreased since 2006, pregnancies, abortions, and fetal defects associated with isotretinoin exposure continue to be a problem,” Elizabeth Tkachenko, BS, from the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, and coauthors concluded. “Further research is required to determine the most efficacious system to reduce complications for patients and administrative requirements for physicians while at the same time maintaining access to this important drug.” (iPledge followed other Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy systems for isotretinoin.)

She and her colleagues performed a retrospective evaluation of pregnancy-related adverse events related to isotretinoin that had occurred between January 1997 and December 2017 using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which receives reports from prescribers, consumers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. While there could be many different classification terms for each individual, any number of adverse events reported by an individual was counted as one pregnancy. Ms. Tkachenko and colleagues classified abortions, pregnancies during contraception use, and pregnancy-related defects into separate subgroups for analysis.

From 1997 to 2017, there were 6,740 pregnancies among women (mean age, 24.6 years) during treatment with isotretinoin reported to FAERS, with 7 reports in 1997, and a peak of 768 pregnancies in 2006. Almost 70% (4,647) of the pregnancies were reported after iPledge was introduced. Between 2011 and 2017, there were 218-310 pregnancy reports each year.

Of the total number of pregnancy reports during the study period, 1,896 were abortions (28.1% of the total); 10.9% of the total number of pregnancy reports were spontaneous abortions (733). The number of abortions peaked in 2008, with 291 reports, of which 85% were therapeutic abortions. Also peaking in 2008 was the number of reports of pregnancies while taking a contraceptive (64). After 2008, pregnancies and abortions dropped.

Fetal defects peaked in 2000, with 34 cases reported, and dropped to four or fewer reports annually after 2008.

“Our findings demonstrate that reports of pregnancy among women taking isotretinoin are concentrated among those aged 20 to 29 years, peaked in 2006, and have been consistent since 2011,” the authors wrote.

Limitations of the study, they noted, include limitations of FAERS data and possible reporting fatigue among doctors and patients. The total number of isotretinoin courses prescribed to this patient population is also unknown, which affected their ability to determine the true rate of pregnancy-related adverse events, they noted.

The other authors for this study were from Harvard Medical School and the departments of dermatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston, as well as the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. One author reported support from an award by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and salary support from a Pfizer Fellowship in Dermatology Patient Oriented Research grant to the trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tkachenko E et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2019. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1388.

The number of pregnancies among women taking isotretinoin has decreased since the introduction of the iPledge program, but pregnancy, abortions, and fetal defects associated with isotretinoin exposure are still occurring in women of reproductive age, according to a retrospective study published in JAMA Dermatology.

In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration implemented the iPledge program, with requirements that include women of childbearing age having a negative pregnancy test and evidence of using two forms of contraception monthly to use isotretinoin, a teratogen. “Although the number of pregnancy-related adverse events for patients taking isotretinoin has decreased since 2006, pregnancies, abortions, and fetal defects associated with isotretinoin exposure continue to be a problem,” Elizabeth Tkachenko, BS, from the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, and coauthors concluded. “Further research is required to determine the most efficacious system to reduce complications for patients and administrative requirements for physicians while at the same time maintaining access to this important drug.” (iPledge followed other Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy systems for isotretinoin.)

She and her colleagues performed a retrospective evaluation of pregnancy-related adverse events related to isotretinoin that had occurred between January 1997 and December 2017 using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which receives reports from prescribers, consumers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. While there could be many different classification terms for each individual, any number of adverse events reported by an individual was counted as one pregnancy. Ms. Tkachenko and colleagues classified abortions, pregnancies during contraception use, and pregnancy-related defects into separate subgroups for analysis.

From 1997 to 2017, there were 6,740 pregnancies among women (mean age, 24.6 years) during treatment with isotretinoin reported to FAERS, with 7 reports in 1997, and a peak of 768 pregnancies in 2006. Almost 70% (4,647) of the pregnancies were reported after iPledge was introduced. Between 2011 and 2017, there were 218-310 pregnancy reports each year.

Of the total number of pregnancy reports during the study period, 1,896 were abortions (28.1% of the total); 10.9% of the total number of pregnancy reports were spontaneous abortions (733). The number of abortions peaked in 2008, with 291 reports, of which 85% were therapeutic abortions. Also peaking in 2008 was the number of reports of pregnancies while taking a contraceptive (64). After 2008, pregnancies and abortions dropped.

Fetal defects peaked in 2000, with 34 cases reported, and dropped to four or fewer reports annually after 2008.

“Our findings demonstrate that reports of pregnancy among women taking isotretinoin are concentrated among those aged 20 to 29 years, peaked in 2006, and have been consistent since 2011,” the authors wrote.

Limitations of the study, they noted, include limitations of FAERS data and possible reporting fatigue among doctors and patients. The total number of isotretinoin courses prescribed to this patient population is also unknown, which affected their ability to determine the true rate of pregnancy-related adverse events, they noted.

The other authors for this study were from Harvard Medical School and the departments of dermatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston, as well as the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. One author reported support from an award by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and salary support from a Pfizer Fellowship in Dermatology Patient Oriented Research grant to the trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tkachenko E et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2019. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1388.

The number of pregnancies among women taking isotretinoin has decreased since the introduction of the iPledge program, but pregnancy, abortions, and fetal defects associated with isotretinoin exposure are still occurring in women of reproductive age, according to a retrospective study published in JAMA Dermatology.

In 2006, the Food and Drug Administration implemented the iPledge program, with requirements that include women of childbearing age having a negative pregnancy test and evidence of using two forms of contraception monthly to use isotretinoin, a teratogen. “Although the number of pregnancy-related adverse events for patients taking isotretinoin has decreased since 2006, pregnancies, abortions, and fetal defects associated with isotretinoin exposure continue to be a problem,” Elizabeth Tkachenko, BS, from the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, and coauthors concluded. “Further research is required to determine the most efficacious system to reduce complications for patients and administrative requirements for physicians while at the same time maintaining access to this important drug.” (iPledge followed other Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy systems for isotretinoin.)

She and her colleagues performed a retrospective evaluation of pregnancy-related adverse events related to isotretinoin that had occurred between January 1997 and December 2017 using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which receives reports from prescribers, consumers, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. While there could be many different classification terms for each individual, any number of adverse events reported by an individual was counted as one pregnancy. Ms. Tkachenko and colleagues classified abortions, pregnancies during contraception use, and pregnancy-related defects into separate subgroups for analysis.

From 1997 to 2017, there were 6,740 pregnancies among women (mean age, 24.6 years) during treatment with isotretinoin reported to FAERS, with 7 reports in 1997, and a peak of 768 pregnancies in 2006. Almost 70% (4,647) of the pregnancies were reported after iPledge was introduced. Between 2011 and 2017, there were 218-310 pregnancy reports each year.

Of the total number of pregnancy reports during the study period, 1,896 were abortions (28.1% of the total); 10.9% of the total number of pregnancy reports were spontaneous abortions (733). The number of abortions peaked in 2008, with 291 reports, of which 85% were therapeutic abortions. Also peaking in 2008 was the number of reports of pregnancies while taking a contraceptive (64). After 2008, pregnancies and abortions dropped.

Fetal defects peaked in 2000, with 34 cases reported, and dropped to four or fewer reports annually after 2008.

“Our findings demonstrate that reports of pregnancy among women taking isotretinoin are concentrated among those aged 20 to 29 years, peaked in 2006, and have been consistent since 2011,” the authors wrote.

Limitations of the study, they noted, include limitations of FAERS data and possible reporting fatigue among doctors and patients. The total number of isotretinoin courses prescribed to this patient population is also unknown, which affected their ability to determine the true rate of pregnancy-related adverse events, they noted.

The other authors for this study were from Harvard Medical School and the departments of dermatology at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, both in Boston, as well as the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. One author reported support from an award by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health and salary support from a Pfizer Fellowship in Dermatology Patient Oriented Research grant to the trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. The other authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Tkachenko E et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2019. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1388.

Researchers have characterized the clinical presentation, progression, and prognosis of leukemia cutis in a pediatric population, according to findings from a retrospective case series.

“To our knowledge, this is the largest reported case series of pediatric leukemia cutis,” wrote Elena Corina Andriescu of the University of Texas, Houston, and colleagues. The results were published in Pediatric Dermatology.

The study included 31 children with histologically confirmed leukemia cutis at one of two pediatric institutions. The researchers reviewed medical records to distinguish common features among patients.

Various clinical data, including disease subtype, related symptoms, management, and prognosis, were collected from January 1993 to March 2014. The children in the case series ranged in age up to 19 years with a median age at diagnosis of 26.8 months.

After analysis, the researchers reported that the magnitude and morphology of disease lesions differed among pediatric patients, with the most common sites being the lower extremities and head. The most common morphologies were nodules and papules. Additionally, the researchers found that lesions were often erythematous, violaceous, or both colors.

The majority of patients (65%) presented with concomitant systemic leukemia and leukemia cutis. The most common types of leukemia associated with the skin condition were acute myeloid leukemia (in 74% of cases) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (in 16% of cases). The researchers saw no significant differences in leukemia cutis morphology or distribution based on the leukemia diagnosis.

“Most cases of leukemia cutis arose during initial leukemia episodes, rather than with relapsed leukemia,” they added.

Because of an insufficiency of specific genetic data, investigators were unable to make prognostic inferences in the majority of participants.

Two key limitations of the study were the small sample size and retrospective design. As a result, the investigators were unable to prospectively classify skin findings in a systematic manner. Despite these limitations, the authors noted that these findings add to the present knowledge of leukemia cutis in pediatric patients.

“Importantly, the presence of [leukemia cutis] changed the management of systemic leukemia in one‐third of patients,” the researchers wrote. “The potential for major changes in treatment plans such as adding radiation therapy and deferring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation underscores the importance of diagnosing [leukemia cutis].”

No funding sources were reported. The authors did not report conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Andriescu EC et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Jul 5. doi: 10.1111/pde.13864.

Researchers have characterized the clinical presentation, progression, and prognosis of leukemia cutis in a pediatric population, according to findings from a retrospective case series.

“To our knowledge, this is the largest reported case series of pediatric leukemia cutis,” wrote Elena Corina Andriescu of the University of Texas, Houston, and colleagues. The results were published in Pediatric Dermatology.

The study included 31 children with histologically confirmed leukemia cutis at one of two pediatric institutions. The researchers reviewed medical records to distinguish common features among patients.

Various clinical data, including disease subtype, related symptoms, management, and prognosis, were collected from January 1993 to March 2014. The children in the case series ranged in age up to 19 years with a median age at diagnosis of 26.8 months.

After analysis, the researchers reported that the magnitude and morphology of disease lesions differed among pediatric patients, with the most common sites being the lower extremities and head. The most common morphologies were nodules and papules. Additionally, the researchers found that lesions were often erythematous, violaceous, or both colors.

The majority of patients (65%) presented with concomitant systemic leukemia and leukemia cutis. The most common types of leukemia associated with the skin condition were acute myeloid leukemia (in 74% of cases) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (in 16% of cases). The researchers saw no significant differences in leukemia cutis morphology or distribution based on the leukemia diagnosis.

“Most cases of leukemia cutis arose during initial leukemia episodes, rather than with relapsed leukemia,” they added.

Because of an insufficiency of specific genetic data, investigators were unable to make prognostic inferences in the majority of participants.

Two key limitations of the study were the small sample size and retrospective design. As a result, the investigators were unable to prospectively classify skin findings in a systematic manner. Despite these limitations, the authors noted that these findings add to the present knowledge of leukemia cutis in pediatric patients.

“Importantly, the presence of [leukemia cutis] changed the management of systemic leukemia in one‐third of patients,” the researchers wrote. “The potential for major changes in treatment plans such as adding radiation therapy and deferring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation underscores the importance of diagnosing [leukemia cutis].”

No funding sources were reported. The authors did not report conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Andriescu EC et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Jul 5. doi: 10.1111/pde.13864.

Researchers have characterized the clinical presentation, progression, and prognosis of leukemia cutis in a pediatric population, according to findings from a retrospective case series.

“To our knowledge, this is the largest reported case series of pediatric leukemia cutis,” wrote Elena Corina Andriescu of the University of Texas, Houston, and colleagues. The results were published in Pediatric Dermatology.

The study included 31 children with histologically confirmed leukemia cutis at one of two pediatric institutions. The researchers reviewed medical records to distinguish common features among patients.

Various clinical data, including disease subtype, related symptoms, management, and prognosis, were collected from January 1993 to March 2014. The children in the case series ranged in age up to 19 years with a median age at diagnosis of 26.8 months.

After analysis, the researchers reported that the magnitude and morphology of disease lesions differed among pediatric patients, with the most common sites being the lower extremities and head. The most common morphologies were nodules and papules. Additionally, the researchers found that lesions were often erythematous, violaceous, or both colors.

The majority of patients (65%) presented with concomitant systemic leukemia and leukemia cutis. The most common types of leukemia associated with the skin condition were acute myeloid leukemia (in 74% of cases) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (in 16% of cases). The researchers saw no significant differences in leukemia cutis morphology or distribution based on the leukemia diagnosis.

“Most cases of leukemia cutis arose during initial leukemia episodes, rather than with relapsed leukemia,” they added.

Because of an insufficiency of specific genetic data, investigators were unable to make prognostic inferences in the majority of participants.

Two key limitations of the study were the small sample size and retrospective design. As a result, the investigators were unable to prospectively classify skin findings in a systematic manner. Despite these limitations, the authors noted that these findings add to the present knowledge of leukemia cutis in pediatric patients.

“Importantly, the presence of [leukemia cutis] changed the management of systemic leukemia in one‐third of patients,” the researchers wrote. “The potential for major changes in treatment plans such as adding radiation therapy and deferring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation underscores the importance of diagnosing [leukemia cutis].”

No funding sources were reported. The authors did not report conflicts of interest.

SOURCE: Andriescu EC et al. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 Jul 5. doi: 10.1111/pde.13864.

CHICAGO – Ovarian cancer diagnoses – and treatment within 30 days of diagnosis – occur earlier under the Affordable Care Act, according to a comparison of National Cancer Database surveys from 2006-2009 and 2011-2014.

During the post-Affordable Care Act (ACA) years of 2011-2014, compared with the pre-ACA years of 2004-2009, a treatment group of women aged 21-64 years with ovarian cancer was more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage, compared with a control group of women aged 65 years and older (difference-in-differences [DD]=1.7%), Anna Jo Smith, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Also, the ACA was associated with more women aged 21-64 receiving treatment within 30 days of diagnosis (DD = 1.6%), said Dr. Smith, a 4th-year resident at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Among women with public insurance, the ACA was associated with even greater improvement in early-stage diagnosis and treatment within 30 days in the treatment group vs. the controls (DD = 2.5% for each), she said, noting that the improvements were seen across race, income, and education groups.

The findings are based on pre-ACA surveys from 35,842 women aged 21-64 years and 28,895 women aged 65 years, and from post-ACA surveys from 37,145 women and 30,604 women in those age groups, respectively, and were adjusted for patient race, living in a rural area, area-level household income and education level, Charlson comorbidity score, distance traveled for care, Census region, and care at an academic center.

The 2010 ACA expanded access to insurance and care for many Americans, and the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of that access on women with ovarian cancer, Dr. Smith explained.

“Under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, women with ovarian cancer were more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage and receive treatment within 30 days of diagnosis,” she said. “As stage and treatment are the major determinants of survival advantage, these gains under the ACA may have long-term impacts on the survival, health, and well-being of women with ovarian cancer.”

Dr. Smith reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Smith A et al., ASCO 2019. Abstract LBA5563.

CHICAGO – Ovarian cancer diagnoses – and treatment within 30 days of diagnosis – occur earlier under the Affordable Care Act, according to a comparison of National Cancer Database surveys from 2006-2009 and 2011-2014.

During the post-Affordable Care Act (ACA) years of 2011-2014, compared with the pre-ACA years of 2004-2009, a treatment group of women aged 21-64 years with ovarian cancer was more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage, compared with a control group of women aged 65 years and older (difference-in-differences [DD]=1.7%), Anna Jo Smith, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Also, the ACA was associated with more women aged 21-64 receiving treatment within 30 days of diagnosis (DD = 1.6%), said Dr. Smith, a 4th-year resident at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Among women with public insurance, the ACA was associated with even greater improvement in early-stage diagnosis and treatment within 30 days in the treatment group vs. the controls (DD = 2.5% for each), she said, noting that the improvements were seen across race, income, and education groups.

The findings are based on pre-ACA surveys from 35,842 women aged 21-64 years and 28,895 women aged 65 years, and from post-ACA surveys from 37,145 women and 30,604 women in those age groups, respectively, and were adjusted for patient race, living in a rural area, area-level household income and education level, Charlson comorbidity score, distance traveled for care, Census region, and care at an academic center.

The 2010 ACA expanded access to insurance and care for many Americans, and the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of that access on women with ovarian cancer, Dr. Smith explained.

“Under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, women with ovarian cancer were more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage and receive treatment within 30 days of diagnosis,” she said. “As stage and treatment are the major determinants of survival advantage, these gains under the ACA may have long-term impacts on the survival, health, and well-being of women with ovarian cancer.”

Dr. Smith reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Smith A et al., ASCO 2019. Abstract LBA5563.

CHICAGO – Ovarian cancer diagnoses – and treatment within 30 days of diagnosis – occur earlier under the Affordable Care Act, according to a comparison of National Cancer Database surveys from 2006-2009 and 2011-2014.

During the post-Affordable Care Act (ACA) years of 2011-2014, compared with the pre-ACA years of 2004-2009, a treatment group of women aged 21-64 years with ovarian cancer was more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage, compared with a control group of women aged 65 years and older (difference-in-differences [DD]=1.7%), Anna Jo Smith, MD, reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Also, the ACA was associated with more women aged 21-64 receiving treatment within 30 days of diagnosis (DD = 1.6%), said Dr. Smith, a 4th-year resident at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Among women with public insurance, the ACA was associated with even greater improvement in early-stage diagnosis and treatment within 30 days in the treatment group vs. the controls (DD = 2.5% for each), she said, noting that the improvements were seen across race, income, and education groups.

The findings are based on pre-ACA surveys from 35,842 women aged 21-64 years and 28,895 women aged 65 years, and from post-ACA surveys from 37,145 women and 30,604 women in those age groups, respectively, and were adjusted for patient race, living in a rural area, area-level household income and education level, Charlson comorbidity score, distance traveled for care, Census region, and care at an academic center.

The 2010 ACA expanded access to insurance and care for many Americans, and the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of that access on women with ovarian cancer, Dr. Smith explained.

“Under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, women with ovarian cancer were more likely to be diagnosed at an early stage and receive treatment within 30 days of diagnosis,” she said. “As stage and treatment are the major determinants of survival advantage, these gains under the ACA may have long-term impacts on the survival, health, and well-being of women with ovarian cancer.”

Dr. Smith reported having no disclosures.

SOURCE: Smith A et al., ASCO 2019. Abstract LBA5563.

In a recent article on this website, Jake Remaly reports on a study suggesting that maternal migraine is associated with infant colic. In a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society, Amy Gelfand, MD, a neurologist at the University of California, San Francisco, reported the results of a national survey of more than 1,400 parents (827 mothers, 592 fathers) collected via social media. She and her colleagues found that mothers with migraine were more likely to have an infant with colic, with an odds ratio of 1.7 that increased to 2.5 for mothers with more frequent migraine. Fathers with migraine were no more likely to have an infant with colic.

AntonioGuillem/Gety Images

In a video clip included in the article, Dr. Gelfand discusses the possibilities that she and her group considered as they attempted to explain the study’s findings. Are there such things as “migraine genes?” If so, the failure to discover a paternal association might suggest that these would be mitochondrial genes. The researchers wondered if a substance in breast milk was acting as trigger, but they found that the association between colic and migraine was unrelated to whether the baby was fed by breast or bottle.

In full disclosure, I was not one of the investigators. Neither my wife nor I have migraine, and although our children cried as infants, they wouldn’t have qualified as having colic. However, I spent more than 40 years immersed in more than 300,000 patient encounters and can claim membership in the International Brother/Sisterhood of Anecdotal Observers. And, as such will offer up my explanation for Dr. Gelfand’s findings.

It is clear to me that most, if not all, children with migraine have their headaches when they are sleep deprived. While my sample size is smaller, I believe the same association also is true for many of the adults I know who have migraine. At least in children, restorative sleep ends the migraine much as it does for an epileptic seizure.

Traditionally, colic has been thought to be somehow related to a gastrointestinal phenomenon by many extended family members and some physicians. However, in my experience, it is usually a symptom of sleep deprivation compounded by the failure of those around the children to realize the obvious and take appropriate action. Of course, some babies are reacting to sore tummies, but my guess is that most are having headaches. We may never know. Dr. Gelfand also shares my observation that colicky crying is more likely to occur “at the end of the day,” a time when we are tired and are less tolerant of overstimulation.

For decades, I have been convinced that migraine and colic are the same pathophysiologic process. However, the presentation varies depending on the age of the patients. Remember, infants can’t talk. It already has been shown that adults with migraine often were more likely to have been colicky infants. (Dr. Gelfand mentions this as well.) These unfortunate individuals probably have inherited a vulnerability to sleep deprivation that manifests itself as a headache. I hope to live long enough to be around when someone discovers the wrinkle in the genome that creates this vulnerability.

So, why did the researchers fail to find an association between fathers and colic? The answer is simple. We fathers are beginning to take on a larger role in parenting of infants and like to complain about how difficult it is. However, it is mothers who still have the lioness’ share of the work. They lose the most sleep and are starting off parenthood with 9 months of less than optimal sleep followed by who knows how many hours of energy-sapping labor. It’s surprising they all don’t have migraines.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

In a recent article on this website, Jake Remaly reports on a study suggesting that maternal migraine is associated with infant colic. In a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society, Amy Gelfand, MD, a neurologist at the University of California, San Francisco, reported the results of a national survey of more than 1,400 parents (827 mothers, 592 fathers) collected via social media. She and her colleagues found that mothers with migraine were more likely to have an infant with colic, with an odds ratio of 1.7 that increased to 2.5 for mothers with more frequent migraine. Fathers with migraine were no more likely to have an infant with colic.

AntonioGuillem/Gety Images

In a video clip included in the article, Dr. Gelfand discusses the possibilities that she and her group considered as they attempted to explain the study’s findings. Are there such things as “migraine genes?” If so, the failure to discover a paternal association might suggest that these would be mitochondrial genes. The researchers wondered if a substance in breast milk was acting as trigger, but they found that the association between colic and migraine was unrelated to whether the baby was fed by breast or bottle.

In full disclosure, I was not one of the investigators. Neither my wife nor I have migraine, and although our children cried as infants, they wouldn’t have qualified as having colic. However, I spent more than 40 years immersed in more than 300,000 patient encounters and can claim membership in the International Brother/Sisterhood of Anecdotal Observers. And, as such will offer up my explanation for Dr. Gelfand’s findings.

It is clear to me that most, if not all, children with migraine have their headaches when they are sleep deprived. While my sample size is smaller, I believe the same association also is true for many of the adults I know who have migraine. At least in children, restorative sleep ends the migraine much as it does for an epileptic seizure.

Traditionally, colic has been thought to be somehow related to a gastrointestinal phenomenon by many extended family members and some physicians. However, in my experience, it is usually a symptom of sleep deprivation compounded by the failure of those around the children to realize the obvious and take appropriate action. Of course, some babies are reacting to sore tummies, but my guess is that most are having headaches. We may never know. Dr. Gelfand also shares my observation that colicky crying is more likely to occur “at the end of the day,” a time when we are tired and are less tolerant of overstimulation.

For decades, I have been convinced that migraine and colic are the same pathophysiologic process. However, the presentation varies depending on the age of the patients. Remember, infants can’t talk. It already has been shown that adults with migraine often were more likely to have been colicky infants. (Dr. Gelfand mentions this as well.) These unfortunate individuals probably have inherited a vulnerability to sleep deprivation that manifests itself as a headache. I hope to live long enough to be around when someone discovers the wrinkle in the genome that creates this vulnerability.

So, why did the researchers fail to find an association between fathers and colic? The answer is simple. We fathers are beginning to take on a larger role in parenting of infants and like to complain about how difficult it is. However, it is mothers who still have the lioness’ share of the work. They lose the most sleep and are starting off parenthood with 9 months of less than optimal sleep followed by who knows how many hours of energy-sapping labor. It’s surprising they all don’t have migraines.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

In a recent article on this website, Jake Remaly reports on a study suggesting that maternal migraine is associated with infant colic. In a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society, Amy Gelfand, MD, a neurologist at the University of California, San Francisco, reported the results of a national survey of more than 1,400 parents (827 mothers, 592 fathers) collected via social media. She and her colleagues found that mothers with migraine were more likely to have an infant with colic, with an odds ratio of 1.7 that increased to 2.5 for mothers with more frequent migraine. Fathers with migraine were no more likely to have an infant with colic.

AntonioGuillem/Gety Images

In a video clip included in the article, Dr. Gelfand discusses the possibilities that she and her group considered as they attempted to explain the study’s findings. Are there such things as “migraine genes?” If so, the failure to discover a paternal association might suggest that these would be mitochondrial genes. The researchers wondered if a substance in breast milk was acting as trigger, but they found that the association between colic and migraine was unrelated to whether the baby was fed by breast or bottle.

In full disclosure, I was not one of the investigators. Neither my wife nor I have migraine, and although our children cried as infants, they wouldn’t have qualified as having colic. However, I spent more than 40 years immersed in more than 300,000 patient encounters and can claim membership in the International Brother/Sisterhood of Anecdotal Observers. And, as such will offer up my explanation for Dr. Gelfand’s findings.

It is clear to me that most, if not all, children with migraine have their headaches when they are sleep deprived. While my sample size is smaller, I believe the same association also is true for many of the adults I know who have migraine. At least in children, restorative sleep ends the migraine much as it does for an epileptic seizure.

Traditionally, colic has been thought to be somehow related to a gastrointestinal phenomenon by many extended family members and some physicians. However, in my experience, it is usually a symptom of sleep deprivation compounded by the failure of those around the children to realize the obvious and take appropriate action. Of course, some babies are reacting to sore tummies, but my guess is that most are having headaches. We may never know. Dr. Gelfand also shares my observation that colicky crying is more likely to occur “at the end of the day,” a time when we are tired and are less tolerant of overstimulation.

For decades, I have been convinced that migraine and colic are the same pathophysiologic process. However, the presentation varies depending on the age of the patients. Remember, infants can’t talk. It already has been shown that adults with migraine often were more likely to have been colicky infants. (Dr. Gelfand mentions this as well.) These unfortunate individuals probably have inherited a vulnerability to sleep deprivation that manifests itself as a headache. I hope to live long enough to be around when someone discovers the wrinkle in the genome that creates this vulnerability.

So, why did the researchers fail to find an association between fathers and colic? The answer is simple. We fathers are beginning to take on a larger role in parenting of infants and like to complain about how difficult it is. However, it is mothers who still have the lioness’ share of the work. They lose the most sleep and are starting off parenthood with 9 months of less than optimal sleep followed by who knows how many hours of energy-sapping labor. It’s surprising they all don’t have migraines.
 

Dr. Wilkoff practiced primary care pediatrics in Brunswick, Maine for nearly 40 years. He has authored several books on behavioral pediatrics, including “How to Say No to Your Toddler.” Email him at [email protected].

The Food and Drug Administration has rejected AstraZeneca’s supplemental New Drug Application for the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin (Farxiga) as an adjunct treatment to insulin in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

The company said in a press statement that the FDA had issued a complete response letter regarding the application. No reason was given for the decision, but the company said it would work with the agency to discuss the next steps.

The once-daily therapy has been approved as both a monotherapy and combination therapy, as an adjunct to diet and exercise, for improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes who cannot achieve control with insulin alone. It also has additional demonstrated benefits of weight loss and reduction in blood pressure.

On March 25, 2019, the drug received its first approval for treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes when the European Commission gave it the green light for use in patients with a body mass index of 27 kg/m² or more when insulin alone does not provide adequate glycemic control. Japan followed a few days later with its approval of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, also for type 1 disease in adults.

The approvals for type 1 diabetes in the European Union and Japan were based on data from the phase 3 DEPICT (Dapagliflozin Evaluation in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Type 1 Diabetes) trial program (DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2), which showed that 5 mg dapagliflozin, taken daily as an oral adjunct to insulin in patients with hard-to-control type 1 disease, reduced blood glucose levels from baseline (the primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints – reductions in weight and total daily insulin use – were also achieved.

Dapagliflozin’s safety profile in the trials in patients with type 1 diabetes was consistent with that established in patients with type 2 disease. However, there was a higher number of cases of diabetic ketoacidosis events in patients who received dapagliflozin. Diabetic ketoacidosis is a known complication for adults with type 1 diabetes and is more prevalent in patients with type 1 disease than in those with type 2.

The Food and Drug Administration has rejected AstraZeneca’s supplemental New Drug Application for the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin (Farxiga) as an adjunct treatment to insulin in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

The company said in a press statement that the FDA had issued a complete response letter regarding the application. No reason was given for the decision, but the company said it would work with the agency to discuss the next steps.

The once-daily therapy has been approved as both a monotherapy and combination therapy, as an adjunct to diet and exercise, for improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes who cannot achieve control with insulin alone. It also has additional demonstrated benefits of weight loss and reduction in blood pressure.

On March 25, 2019, the drug received its first approval for treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes when the European Commission gave it the green light for use in patients with a body mass index of 27 kg/m² or more when insulin alone does not provide adequate glycemic control. Japan followed a few days later with its approval of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, also for type 1 disease in adults.

The approvals for type 1 diabetes in the European Union and Japan were based on data from the phase 3 DEPICT (Dapagliflozin Evaluation in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Type 1 Diabetes) trial program (DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2), which showed that 5 mg dapagliflozin, taken daily as an oral adjunct to insulin in patients with hard-to-control type 1 disease, reduced blood glucose levels from baseline (the primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints – reductions in weight and total daily insulin use – were also achieved.

Dapagliflozin’s safety profile in the trials in patients with type 1 diabetes was consistent with that established in patients with type 2 disease. However, there was a higher number of cases of diabetic ketoacidosis events in patients who received dapagliflozin. Diabetic ketoacidosis is a known complication for adults with type 1 diabetes and is more prevalent in patients with type 1 disease than in those with type 2.

The Food and Drug Administration has rejected AstraZeneca’s supplemental New Drug Application for the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor dapagliflozin (Farxiga) as an adjunct treatment to insulin in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.

The company said in a press statement that the FDA had issued a complete response letter regarding the application. No reason was given for the decision, but the company said it would work with the agency to discuss the next steps.

The once-daily therapy has been approved as both a monotherapy and combination therapy, as an adjunct to diet and exercise, for improving glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes who cannot achieve control with insulin alone. It also has additional demonstrated benefits of weight loss and reduction in blood pressure.

On March 25, 2019, the drug received its first approval for treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes when the European Commission gave it the green light for use in patients with a body mass index of 27 kg/m² or more when insulin alone does not provide adequate glycemic control. Japan followed a few days later with its approval of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, also for type 1 disease in adults.

The approvals for type 1 diabetes in the European Union and Japan were based on data from the phase 3 DEPICT (Dapagliflozin Evaluation in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Type 1 Diabetes) trial program (DEPICT-1 and DEPICT-2), which showed that 5 mg dapagliflozin, taken daily as an oral adjunct to insulin in patients with hard-to-control type 1 disease, reduced blood glucose levels from baseline (the primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints – reductions in weight and total daily insulin use – were also achieved.

Dapagliflozin’s safety profile in the trials in patients with type 1 diabetes was consistent with that established in patients with type 2 disease. However, there was a higher number of cases of diabetic ketoacidosis events in patients who received dapagliflozin. Diabetic ketoacidosis is a known complication for adults with type 1 diabetes and is more prevalent in patients with type 1 disease than in those with type 2.

LOS ANGELES – Scientists testing an unusual hypothesis about the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease say that use of an experimental antimicrobial drug to target a common oral infection was associated with biomarker improvements in people with the disease.

At the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, Michael Detke, MD, PhD, of Cortexyme in South San Francisco, Calif., presented findings from a small cohort (n = 9) of people with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Six patients, mean age 72, were randomized to 4 weeks’ treatment with an agent called COR388, which inhibits toxic proteases produced by Porphyromonas gingivalis, a bacterium that colonizes the mouth and gums and has been found in the brains and cerebrospinal fluid of people with AD more than in non-AD patients. Another three subjects were randomized to placebo.

At 28 days, the CSF levels of an Alzheimer’s-associated apolipoprotein E (ApoE) fragment and serum levels of RANTES, a chemokine associated with chronic inflammation, were reduced from baseline by about one-third in treated subjects, compared with placebo subjects (P less than .05).

“In AD, ApoE is known to be fragmented and the fragments are known to be neurotoxic,” Dr. Detke, the lead study author, said in an interview. “We hypothesized that these P. gingivalis proteases may be acting on ApoE cleavage – so if you bind the proteases you should reduce the fragments. We saw in this study that ApoE fragment was reduced by 30%, or back to about normal levels.”

It is difficult to eradicate P. gingivalis infection using conventional antibiotics. The experimental agent COR388 “does not kill the bacteria but rather neutralizes it by binding to the proteases it produces, making the bacteria benign,” Dr. Detke said.


While hypotheses involving infectious causes of Alzheimer’s remain on the periphery of dementia research, Dr. Detke and his colleagues will soon be able to test theirs in a more meaningful way. At the conference, Dr. Detke presented detailed plans for a phase 2/3, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of COR388 in 570 patients aged 55-80 with mild to moderate AD.

Patients in the study are currently being randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with one of two doses, or placebo, with cognitive and biomarker endpoints planned, including for amyloid-beta, tau, and serum, plasma, and CSF markers of neuroinflammation.

Dr. Detke is an employee of Cortexyme, as are another 8 of the study’s 11 authors.

LOS ANGELES – Scientists testing an unusual hypothesis about the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease say that use of an experimental antimicrobial drug to target a common oral infection was associated with biomarker improvements in people with the disease.

At the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, Michael Detke, MD, PhD, of Cortexyme in South San Francisco, Calif., presented findings from a small cohort (n = 9) of people with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Six patients, mean age 72, were randomized to 4 weeks’ treatment with an agent called COR388, which inhibits toxic proteases produced by Porphyromonas gingivalis, a bacterium that colonizes the mouth and gums and has been found in the brains and cerebrospinal fluid of people with AD more than in non-AD patients. Another three subjects were randomized to placebo.

At 28 days, the CSF levels of an Alzheimer’s-associated apolipoprotein E (ApoE) fragment and serum levels of RANTES, a chemokine associated with chronic inflammation, were reduced from baseline by about one-third in treated subjects, compared with placebo subjects (P less than .05).

“In AD, ApoE is known to be fragmented and the fragments are known to be neurotoxic,” Dr. Detke, the lead study author, said in an interview. “We hypothesized that these P. gingivalis proteases may be acting on ApoE cleavage – so if you bind the proteases you should reduce the fragments. We saw in this study that ApoE fragment was reduced by 30%, or back to about normal levels.”

It is difficult to eradicate P. gingivalis infection using conventional antibiotics. The experimental agent COR388 “does not kill the bacteria but rather neutralizes it by binding to the proteases it produces, making the bacteria benign,” Dr. Detke said.


While hypotheses involving infectious causes of Alzheimer’s remain on the periphery of dementia research, Dr. Detke and his colleagues will soon be able to test theirs in a more meaningful way. At the conference, Dr. Detke presented detailed plans for a phase 2/3, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of COR388 in 570 patients aged 55-80 with mild to moderate AD.

Patients in the study are currently being randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with one of two doses, or placebo, with cognitive and biomarker endpoints planned, including for amyloid-beta, tau, and serum, plasma, and CSF markers of neuroinflammation.

Dr. Detke is an employee of Cortexyme, as are another 8 of the study’s 11 authors.

LOS ANGELES – Scientists testing an unusual hypothesis about the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease say that use of an experimental antimicrobial drug to target a common oral infection was associated with biomarker improvements in people with the disease.

At the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference, Michael Detke, MD, PhD, of Cortexyme in South San Francisco, Calif., presented findings from a small cohort (n = 9) of people with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Six patients, mean age 72, were randomized to 4 weeks’ treatment with an agent called COR388, which inhibits toxic proteases produced by Porphyromonas gingivalis, a bacterium that colonizes the mouth and gums and has been found in the brains and cerebrospinal fluid of people with AD more than in non-AD patients. Another three subjects were randomized to placebo.

At 28 days, the CSF levels of an Alzheimer’s-associated apolipoprotein E (ApoE) fragment and serum levels of RANTES, a chemokine associated with chronic inflammation, were reduced from baseline by about one-third in treated subjects, compared with placebo subjects (P less than .05).

“In AD, ApoE is known to be fragmented and the fragments are known to be neurotoxic,” Dr. Detke, the lead study author, said in an interview. “We hypothesized that these P. gingivalis proteases may be acting on ApoE cleavage – so if you bind the proteases you should reduce the fragments. We saw in this study that ApoE fragment was reduced by 30%, or back to about normal levels.”

It is difficult to eradicate P. gingivalis infection using conventional antibiotics. The experimental agent COR388 “does not kill the bacteria but rather neutralizes it by binding to the proteases it produces, making the bacteria benign,” Dr. Detke said.


While hypotheses involving infectious causes of Alzheimer’s remain on the periphery of dementia research, Dr. Detke and his colleagues will soon be able to test theirs in a more meaningful way. At the conference, Dr. Detke presented detailed plans for a phase 2/3, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of COR388 in 570 patients aged 55-80 with mild to moderate AD.

Patients in the study are currently being randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with one of two doses, or placebo, with cognitive and biomarker endpoints planned, including for amyloid-beta, tau, and serum, plasma, and CSF markers of neuroinflammation.

Dr. Detke is an employee of Cortexyme, as are another 8 of the study’s 11 authors.

Combination radiotherapy and pembrolizumab may improve clinical outcomes by means of synergy in the treatment of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to results from two recent studies.

“The best way to combine immunotherapy with ablative therapies in the curative setting is an area of active investigation,” wrote Joshua M. Bauml, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues.

Dr. Bauml and colleagues recently reported the results of a phase 2 study exploring the addition of pembrolizumab following the completion of locally ablative therapy in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC in JAMA Oncology.

The single-arm trial included 51 patients who received intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg every 21 days) for a total of 8 cycles within 4-12 weeks of local ablative therapy completion. Study participants were administered locally ablative therapy to all recognized sites of malignancy.

The researchers measured two primary efficacy outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS) from the initiation of ablative therapy and the PFS from initiation of pembrolizumab. Secondary endpoints were safety, quality of life, and overall survival (OS).

Among patients who received pembrolizumab after ablative therapy, the median PFS was 19.1 months (95% CI, 9.4-28.7 months), which was significantly longer than the historical outcome (median PFS, 6.6 months; P = .005). In addition, the 24-month OS was 77.5%. With respect to safety, no decrease in quality of life or new safety signals were reported in the study.

One key limitation of the study was the single-arm design. As a result, distinguishing the effects of pembrolizumab over ablative therapy alone is not possible with the present data.

“This study is the first to show improved outcomes for immunotherapy after locally ablative therapy in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC,” Dr. Bauml and his colleagues wrote.

In another phase 2 trial (PEMBRO-RT study) reported in the same issue, Willemijn S.M.E. Theelen, MD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam and colleagues examined the use of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy or pembrolizumab alone in patients with recurrent metastatic NSCLC.

“This study evaluates whether stereotactic body radiotherapy enhances the effect of immune checkpoint blockade,” wrote Dr. Theelen and colleagues.

The PEMBRO-RT study included 76 patients with recurrent metastatic NSCLC who were randomized to pembrolizumab following radiotherapy or pembrolizumab alone. Intravenous pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with the first dose given within 7 days after completion of radiotherapy.

The primary outcome was the overall response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included OS, PFS, and safety.

Among patients who received pembrolizumab after radiotherapy versus pembrolizumab alone, the ORR at 12 weeks was 36% and 18%, respectively (P = .07). In addition, the median PFS and OS were not statistically significant (P = .19 and P = .16, respectively).

“Positive results were largely influenced by the PD-L1–negative subgroup, which had significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival,” the researchers wrote.

With respect to safety, no differences in grade 3-5 adverse effects were observed between the treatment groups. In addition, no significant differences were seen in pulmonary toxicities.

One key limitation of the study was the lack of information regarding optimal radiotherapy dosing and schedule.

“The results of this study are encouraging, and further evaluation in a larger phase 2/3 trial is recommended,” Dr. Theelen and colleagues wrote.

Further studies are needed to fully understand the links between combination radiotherapy and pembrolizumab in patients with NSCLC.

The study by Dr. Bauml and colleagues was funded by the Abramson Cancer Center and Merck & Co. The authors reported financial affiliations with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, and several others.

The study by Dr. Theelen and colleagues was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme. The authors reported financial affiliations with AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Takeda, and several others.
 

SOURCE: Bauml JM et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1449. Theelen WSME et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478.

Combination radiotherapy and pembrolizumab may improve clinical outcomes by means of synergy in the treatment of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to results from two recent studies.

“The best way to combine immunotherapy with ablative therapies in the curative setting is an area of active investigation,” wrote Joshua M. Bauml, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues.

Dr. Bauml and colleagues recently reported the results of a phase 2 study exploring the addition of pembrolizumab following the completion of locally ablative therapy in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC in JAMA Oncology.

The single-arm trial included 51 patients who received intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg every 21 days) for a total of 8 cycles within 4-12 weeks of local ablative therapy completion. Study participants were administered locally ablative therapy to all recognized sites of malignancy.

The researchers measured two primary efficacy outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS) from the initiation of ablative therapy and the PFS from initiation of pembrolizumab. Secondary endpoints were safety, quality of life, and overall survival (OS).

Among patients who received pembrolizumab after ablative therapy, the median PFS was 19.1 months (95% CI, 9.4-28.7 months), which was significantly longer than the historical outcome (median PFS, 6.6 months; P = .005). In addition, the 24-month OS was 77.5%. With respect to safety, no decrease in quality of life or new safety signals were reported in the study.

One key limitation of the study was the single-arm design. As a result, distinguishing the effects of pembrolizumab over ablative therapy alone is not possible with the present data.

“This study is the first to show improved outcomes for immunotherapy after locally ablative therapy in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC,” Dr. Bauml and his colleagues wrote.

In another phase 2 trial (PEMBRO-RT study) reported in the same issue, Willemijn S.M.E. Theelen, MD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam and colleagues examined the use of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy or pembrolizumab alone in patients with recurrent metastatic NSCLC.

“This study evaluates whether stereotactic body radiotherapy enhances the effect of immune checkpoint blockade,” wrote Dr. Theelen and colleagues.

The PEMBRO-RT study included 76 patients with recurrent metastatic NSCLC who were randomized to pembrolizumab following radiotherapy or pembrolizumab alone. Intravenous pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with the first dose given within 7 days after completion of radiotherapy.

The primary outcome was the overall response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included OS, PFS, and safety.

Among patients who received pembrolizumab after radiotherapy versus pembrolizumab alone, the ORR at 12 weeks was 36% and 18%, respectively (P = .07). In addition, the median PFS and OS were not statistically significant (P = .19 and P = .16, respectively).

“Positive results were largely influenced by the PD-L1–negative subgroup, which had significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival,” the researchers wrote.

With respect to safety, no differences in grade 3-5 adverse effects were observed between the treatment groups. In addition, no significant differences were seen in pulmonary toxicities.

One key limitation of the study was the lack of information regarding optimal radiotherapy dosing and schedule.

“The results of this study are encouraging, and further evaluation in a larger phase 2/3 trial is recommended,” Dr. Theelen and colleagues wrote.

Further studies are needed to fully understand the links between combination radiotherapy and pembrolizumab in patients with NSCLC.

The study by Dr. Bauml and colleagues was funded by the Abramson Cancer Center and Merck & Co. The authors reported financial affiliations with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, and several others.

The study by Dr. Theelen and colleagues was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme. The authors reported financial affiliations with AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Takeda, and several others.
 

SOURCE: Bauml JM et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1449. Theelen WSME et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478.

Combination radiotherapy and pembrolizumab may improve clinical outcomes by means of synergy in the treatment of patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to results from two recent studies.

“The best way to combine immunotherapy with ablative therapies in the curative setting is an area of active investigation,” wrote Joshua M. Bauml, MD, of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and colleagues.

Dr. Bauml and colleagues recently reported the results of a phase 2 study exploring the addition of pembrolizumab following the completion of locally ablative therapy in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC in JAMA Oncology.

The single-arm trial included 51 patients who received intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg every 21 days) for a total of 8 cycles within 4-12 weeks of local ablative therapy completion. Study participants were administered locally ablative therapy to all recognized sites of malignancy.

The researchers measured two primary efficacy outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS) from the initiation of ablative therapy and the PFS from initiation of pembrolizumab. Secondary endpoints were safety, quality of life, and overall survival (OS).

Among patients who received pembrolizumab after ablative therapy, the median PFS was 19.1 months (95% CI, 9.4-28.7 months), which was significantly longer than the historical outcome (median PFS, 6.6 months; P = .005). In addition, the 24-month OS was 77.5%. With respect to safety, no decrease in quality of life or new safety signals were reported in the study.

One key limitation of the study was the single-arm design. As a result, distinguishing the effects of pembrolizumab over ablative therapy alone is not possible with the present data.

“This study is the first to show improved outcomes for immunotherapy after locally ablative therapy in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC,” Dr. Bauml and his colleagues wrote.

In another phase 2 trial (PEMBRO-RT study) reported in the same issue, Willemijn S.M.E. Theelen, MD, of the Netherlands Cancer Institute in Amsterdam and colleagues examined the use of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy or pembrolizumab alone in patients with recurrent metastatic NSCLC.

“This study evaluates whether stereotactic body radiotherapy enhances the effect of immune checkpoint blockade,” wrote Dr. Theelen and colleagues.

The PEMBRO-RT study included 76 patients with recurrent metastatic NSCLC who were randomized to pembrolizumab following radiotherapy or pembrolizumab alone. Intravenous pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with the first dose given within 7 days after completion of radiotherapy.

The primary outcome was the overall response rate (ORR) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included OS, PFS, and safety.

Among patients who received pembrolizumab after radiotherapy versus pembrolizumab alone, the ORR at 12 weeks was 36% and 18%, respectively (P = .07). In addition, the median PFS and OS were not statistically significant (P = .19 and P = .16, respectively).

“Positive results were largely influenced by the PD-L1–negative subgroup, which had significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival,” the researchers wrote.

With respect to safety, no differences in grade 3-5 adverse effects were observed between the treatment groups. In addition, no significant differences were seen in pulmonary toxicities.

One key limitation of the study was the lack of information regarding optimal radiotherapy dosing and schedule.

“The results of this study are encouraging, and further evaluation in a larger phase 2/3 trial is recommended,” Dr. Theelen and colleagues wrote.

Further studies are needed to fully understand the links between combination radiotherapy and pembrolizumab in patients with NSCLC.

The study by Dr. Bauml and colleagues was funded by the Abramson Cancer Center and Merck & Co. The authors reported financial affiliations with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, and several others.

The study by Dr. Theelen and colleagues was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme. The authors reported financial affiliations with AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Takeda, and several others.
 

SOURCE: Bauml JM et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1449. Theelen WSME et al. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jul 11. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1478.

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder who participate in a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention before treatment with exposure and response prevention (ERP) get better short-term results, compared with those who participate in a relaxation intervention before ERP, a small study shows.

“These findings suggest that MI prior to ERP may confer a small but meaningful benefit for enhancing treatment outcome post ERP,” wrote Randi E. McCabe, PhD, of the department of psychiatry and behavioral neurosciences at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., and associates. The study was published in the Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders.

Dr. McCabe and associates randomized 40 patients aged 18-65 years to the MI intervention and relaxation groups. All participants had a diagnosis of OCD as defined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. They also scored 16 or higher on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and said they were interested in the ERP treatment. After a few participants dropped out, 18 were left in the MI group and 17 were in the relaxation group.

The MI intervention consisted of three sessions that focused on raising awareness about the emotional and financial impact of the illness on patients’ lives, and addressing their concerns about ERP – which is a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy tailored to meet the needs of people with OCD. Meanwhile, the relaxation therapy was a three-session protocol consisting of progressive muscle relaxation.

Participants in both groups experienced reductions in symptoms in the short term, but the symptom reductions were more significant for participants in the MI group. For example, Y-BOCS scores were significantly lower among participants in the MI group posttreatment, compared with those in the relaxation intervention (13.72 vs. 16.20 at 3-month follow-up and 13.81 vs. 14.00 at 6-month follow-up). “Whereas Y-BOCS scores decreased from the severe range to the moderate range in the relaxation group, scores decreased from the severe to the mild range in the MI group,” the investigators wrote. Similar trends were found on other measures, including the DASS-21 depression scale and the DASS-21 anxiety stress scale. At the 12-month follow-up, however, “both groups looked similar,” Dr. McCabe and associates reported.

Several limitations were cited, including the small study size and the baseline differences in the participants’ self-reported OCD symptoms.

Nevertheless, the results suggest that intervening with MI before ERP might prove helpful for patients who need immediate relief from OCD symptoms, such as new parents and patients at risk of job loss, they wrote.

Dr. McCabe and her associates reported no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: McCabe RE et al. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2019.1004466.

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder who participate in a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention before treatment with exposure and response prevention (ERP) get better short-term results, compared with those who participate in a relaxation intervention before ERP, a small study shows.

“These findings suggest that MI prior to ERP may confer a small but meaningful benefit for enhancing treatment outcome post ERP,” wrote Randi E. McCabe, PhD, of the department of psychiatry and behavioral neurosciences at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., and associates. The study was published in the Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders.

Dr. McCabe and associates randomized 40 patients aged 18-65 years to the MI intervention and relaxation groups. All participants had a diagnosis of OCD as defined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. They also scored 16 or higher on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and said they were interested in the ERP treatment. After a few participants dropped out, 18 were left in the MI group and 17 were in the relaxation group.

The MI intervention consisted of three sessions that focused on raising awareness about the emotional and financial impact of the illness on patients’ lives, and addressing their concerns about ERP – which is a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy tailored to meet the needs of people with OCD. Meanwhile, the relaxation therapy was a three-session protocol consisting of progressive muscle relaxation.

Participants in both groups experienced reductions in symptoms in the short term, but the symptom reductions were more significant for participants in the MI group. For example, Y-BOCS scores were significantly lower among participants in the MI group posttreatment, compared with those in the relaxation intervention (13.72 vs. 16.20 at 3-month follow-up and 13.81 vs. 14.00 at 6-month follow-up). “Whereas Y-BOCS scores decreased from the severe range to the moderate range in the relaxation group, scores decreased from the severe to the mild range in the MI group,” the investigators wrote. Similar trends were found on other measures, including the DASS-21 depression scale and the DASS-21 anxiety stress scale. At the 12-month follow-up, however, “both groups looked similar,” Dr. McCabe and associates reported.

Several limitations were cited, including the small study size and the baseline differences in the participants’ self-reported OCD symptoms.

Nevertheless, the results suggest that intervening with MI before ERP might prove helpful for patients who need immediate relief from OCD symptoms, such as new parents and patients at risk of job loss, they wrote.

Dr. McCabe and her associates reported no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: McCabe RE et al. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2019.1004466.

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder who participate in a motivational interviewing (MI) intervention before treatment with exposure and response prevention (ERP) get better short-term results, compared with those who participate in a relaxation intervention before ERP, a small study shows.

“These findings suggest that MI prior to ERP may confer a small but meaningful benefit for enhancing treatment outcome post ERP,” wrote Randi E. McCabe, PhD, of the department of psychiatry and behavioral neurosciences at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., and associates. The study was published in the Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders.

Dr. McCabe and associates randomized 40 patients aged 18-65 years to the MI intervention and relaxation groups. All participants had a diagnosis of OCD as defined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. They also scored 16 or higher on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and said they were interested in the ERP treatment. After a few participants dropped out, 18 were left in the MI group and 17 were in the relaxation group.

The MI intervention consisted of three sessions that focused on raising awareness about the emotional and financial impact of the illness on patients’ lives, and addressing their concerns about ERP – which is a form of cognitive-behavioral therapy tailored to meet the needs of people with OCD. Meanwhile, the relaxation therapy was a three-session protocol consisting of progressive muscle relaxation.

Participants in both groups experienced reductions in symptoms in the short term, but the symptom reductions were more significant for participants in the MI group. For example, Y-BOCS scores were significantly lower among participants in the MI group posttreatment, compared with those in the relaxation intervention (13.72 vs. 16.20 at 3-month follow-up and 13.81 vs. 14.00 at 6-month follow-up). “Whereas Y-BOCS scores decreased from the severe range to the moderate range in the relaxation group, scores decreased from the severe to the mild range in the MI group,” the investigators wrote. Similar trends were found on other measures, including the DASS-21 depression scale and the DASS-21 anxiety stress scale. At the 12-month follow-up, however, “both groups looked similar,” Dr. McCabe and associates reported.

Several limitations were cited, including the small study size and the baseline differences in the participants’ self-reported OCD symptoms.

Nevertheless, the results suggest that intervening with MI before ERP might prove helpful for patients who need immediate relief from OCD symptoms, such as new parents and patients at risk of job loss, they wrote.

Dr. McCabe and her associates reported no disclosures.

[email protected]

SOURCE: McCabe RE et al. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2019.1004466.