Cutis

Orf, also known as ecthyma contagiosum, is a common viral zoonotic infection caused by a parapoxvirus. It is widespread among small ruminants such as sheep and goats, and it can be transmitted to humans by close contact with infected animals or contaminated fomites. It usually manifests as vesiculoulcerative lesions or nodules on the inoculation sites, mostly on the hands, but other sites such as the head and scalp occasionally may be involved.¹ We report the case of an orf that proliferated dramatically and became giant after total excision. It was successfully treated with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections and imiquimod cream.

Case Report

A 68-year-old man presented with a rapidly enlarging mass on the left hand that developed 4 weeks prior after close contact with a freshly slaughtered sheep during an Islamic holiday in Turkey. His medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which was diagnosed one year prior. The patient had been treated with systemic prednisolone and cyclophosphamide therapies, but his disease was in remission at the current presentation and he currently was not receiving any treatment. On physical examination, a 2-cm, exophytic, pinkish gray, weeping nodule was observed on the proximal aspect of the right thumb. Based on the clinical findings and typical anamnesis, a diagnosis of an orf was concluded. It was decided to monitor the patient without any intervention; however, because the lesion did not resolve and remained stable, he was referred to a plastic surgeon for surgical removal after 6 weeks of follow-up.

Histopathologic examination of the excision specimen revealed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, massive capillary proliferation, and viral cytopathic changes in keratinocytes characterized by ballooning degeneration and eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions, which was consistent with the clinical diagnosis of an orf. Unfortunately, the lesion relapsed rapidly following excision (Figure, A). Treatment with oral valacyclovir (1 g 3 times daily) and imiquimod cream 5% (3 times weekly) was initiated. However, this treatment was unsuccessful and was discontinued after 6 weeks, as the lesion kept growing, reaching a diameter of approximately 5 cm and becoming lobulated on the surface (Figure, B). Combination therapy was started with imiquimod cream 5% (3 times weekly) and intralesional interferon alfa-2a injections (3 million IU twice weekly). The injections were so painful that the patient refused further therapy after only 2 injections. The therapy was switched from intralesional to systemic subcutaneous injections of interferon alfa-2a (3 million IU twice weekly) with concomitant imiquimod cream 5% 3 times weekly. This treatment was well tolerated by our patient with no notable side effects, except for mild fever on the night of each injection. Three weeks after the commencement of systemic injections, remarkable healing of the lesions with reduced size and exudation was noted. The frequency of injections was decreased to once weekly, which was then discontinued after 6 weeks when the lesion totally resolved (Figure, C). At 12 months’ follow-up, there were no signs of relapse.

Comment

Orf is an occupational disease that usually develops in farmers, butchers, and veterinarians; however, epidemic outbreaks of human orf are commonly observed in Turkey after the feast of sacrifice, as many individuals have close contact with the animals during sacrification.² In Turkey, orf is well recognized by dermatologists, and clinical diagnosis usually is not difficult.

Human orf has a self-limited course in which lesions spontaneously resolve in 4 to 8 weeks; however, in immunocompromised patients, such as our patient with CLL, orf lesions may be persistent, atypical, and giant, requiring early and effective treatment. Treatment options for giant orf tumors in immunocompromised individuals include surgical excision,³ cryotherapy, topical imiquimod,^4,5 topical or intralesional cidofovir,⁶ and intralesional interferon alfa injections.⁷ According to our clinical observations, surgical interventions for treatment of orfs usually cause a delay in the natural healing process; however, because surgical excision is a recommended treatment option for exophytic and recalcitrant orfs, we decided to treat our patient with surgical excision, which resulted in rapid recurrence and massive proliferation. A similar case of giant orf that was aggravated after surgery has been reported.⁸ In light of these cases, it is our opinion that treatment options other than surgery may be reasonable.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia may show features of both humoral and cell-mediated deficiency. Patients are known to be prone to viral infections such as varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, and human papillomavirus. A giant orf infection on the background of CLL also has been described.⁹

Interferons were first discovered in 1957 and named after their ability to interfere with viral replication. They represent a family of cytokines that has an essential role in the innate immune response to virus infections. Because of their antiviral properties, recombinant forms of interferon alfa are widely used with success in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections. A few other antiviral clinical applications of interferon alfa include infections caused by human herpesvirus 8 (the etiological agent in Kaposi sarcoma) and human papillomatosis virus (the etiological agent in juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis and condyloma acuminatum).¹⁰

In a report by Ran et al,⁷ intralesional interferon alfa injections were successfully used for treatment of giant orf lesions in an immunocompromised patient. As a result, we started treating the patient with intralesional interferon alfa-2a, but it was not well tolerated by our patient, as it was quite painful. We then decided to continue the therapy with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections, as we believed that it was a good option due to its antiviral, antiproliferative, and antiangiogenic properties. With the experimental combined therapy of systemic interferon alfa-2a and topical imiquimod, our patient achieved a complete response in 9 weeks (3 weeks of twice weekly injections and then 6 weeks of once weekly injections) and had no relapses during 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

We present a rare case of a giant orf treated with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections. Because intralesional injections are quite painful, systemic subcutaneous injections of interferon might be a good and safe alternative for recalcitrant orf lesions in immunocompromised patients. However, more studies and reports are needed to confirm its effectiveness and safety.

The 9th Cosmetic Surgery Forum will be held November 29-December 2, 2017, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Get more information at www.cosmeticsurgeryforum.com.

Orf, also known as ecthyma contagiosum, is a common viral zoonotic infection caused by a parapoxvirus. It is widespread among small ruminants such as sheep and goats, and it can be transmitted to humans by close contact with infected animals or contaminated fomites. It usually manifests as vesiculoulcerative lesions or nodules on the inoculation sites, mostly on the hands, but other sites such as the head and scalp occasionally may be involved.¹ We report the case of an orf that proliferated dramatically and became giant after total excision. It was successfully treated with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections and imiquimod cream.

Case Report

A 68-year-old man presented with a rapidly enlarging mass on the left hand that developed 4 weeks prior after close contact with a freshly slaughtered sheep during an Islamic holiday in Turkey. His medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which was diagnosed one year prior. The patient had been treated with systemic prednisolone and cyclophosphamide therapies, but his disease was in remission at the current presentation and he currently was not receiving any treatment. On physical examination, a 2-cm, exophytic, pinkish gray, weeping nodule was observed on the proximal aspect of the right thumb. Based on the clinical findings and typical anamnesis, a diagnosis of an orf was concluded. It was decided to monitor the patient without any intervention; however, because the lesion did not resolve and remained stable, he was referred to a plastic surgeon for surgical removal after 6 weeks of follow-up.

Histopathologic examination of the excision specimen revealed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, massive capillary proliferation, and viral cytopathic changes in keratinocytes characterized by ballooning degeneration and eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions, which was consistent with the clinical diagnosis of an orf. Unfortunately, the lesion relapsed rapidly following excision (Figure, A). Treatment with oral valacyclovir (1 g 3 times daily) and imiquimod cream 5% (3 times weekly) was initiated. However, this treatment was unsuccessful and was discontinued after 6 weeks, as the lesion kept growing, reaching a diameter of approximately 5 cm and becoming lobulated on the surface (Figure, B). Combination therapy was started with imiquimod cream 5% (3 times weekly) and intralesional interferon alfa-2a injections (3 million IU twice weekly). The injections were so painful that the patient refused further therapy after only 2 injections. The therapy was switched from intralesional to systemic subcutaneous injections of interferon alfa-2a (3 million IU twice weekly) with concomitant imiquimod cream 5% 3 times weekly. This treatment was well tolerated by our patient with no notable side effects, except for mild fever on the night of each injection. Three weeks after the commencement of systemic injections, remarkable healing of the lesions with reduced size and exudation was noted. The frequency of injections was decreased to once weekly, which was then discontinued after 6 weeks when the lesion totally resolved (Figure, C). At 12 months’ follow-up, there were no signs of relapse.

Comment

Orf is an occupational disease that usually develops in farmers, butchers, and veterinarians; however, epidemic outbreaks of human orf are commonly observed in Turkey after the feast of sacrifice, as many individuals have close contact with the animals during sacrification.² In Turkey, orf is well recognized by dermatologists, and clinical diagnosis usually is not difficult.

Human orf has a self-limited course in which lesions spontaneously resolve in 4 to 8 weeks; however, in immunocompromised patients, such as our patient with CLL, orf lesions may be persistent, atypical, and giant, requiring early and effective treatment. Treatment options for giant orf tumors in immunocompromised individuals include surgical excision,³ cryotherapy, topical imiquimod,^4,5 topical or intralesional cidofovir,⁶ and intralesional interferon alfa injections.⁷ According to our clinical observations, surgical interventions for treatment of orfs usually cause a delay in the natural healing process; however, because surgical excision is a recommended treatment option for exophytic and recalcitrant orfs, we decided to treat our patient with surgical excision, which resulted in rapid recurrence and massive proliferation. A similar case of giant orf that was aggravated after surgery has been reported.⁸ In light of these cases, it is our opinion that treatment options other than surgery may be reasonable.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia may show features of both humoral and cell-mediated deficiency. Patients are known to be prone to viral infections such as varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, and human papillomavirus. A giant orf infection on the background of CLL also has been described.⁹

Interferons were first discovered in 1957 and named after their ability to interfere with viral replication. They represent a family of cytokines that has an essential role in the innate immune response to virus infections. Because of their antiviral properties, recombinant forms of interferon alfa are widely used with success in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections. A few other antiviral clinical applications of interferon alfa include infections caused by human herpesvirus 8 (the etiological agent in Kaposi sarcoma) and human papillomatosis virus (the etiological agent in juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis and condyloma acuminatum).¹⁰

In a report by Ran et al,⁷ intralesional interferon alfa injections were successfully used for treatment of giant orf lesions in an immunocompromised patient. As a result, we started treating the patient with intralesional interferon alfa-2a, but it was not well tolerated by our patient, as it was quite painful. We then decided to continue the therapy with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections, as we believed that it was a good option due to its antiviral, antiproliferative, and antiangiogenic properties. With the experimental combined therapy of systemic interferon alfa-2a and topical imiquimod, our patient achieved a complete response in 9 weeks (3 weeks of twice weekly injections and then 6 weeks of once weekly injections) and had no relapses during 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

We present a rare case of a giant orf treated with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections. Because intralesional injections are quite painful, systemic subcutaneous injections of interferon might be a good and safe alternative for recalcitrant orf lesions in immunocompromised patients. However, more studies and reports are needed to confirm its effectiveness and safety.

The 9th Cosmetic Surgery Forum will be held November 29-December 2, 2017, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Get more information at www.cosmeticsurgeryforum.com.

Orf, also known as ecthyma contagiosum, is a common viral zoonotic infection caused by a parapoxvirus. It is widespread among small ruminants such as sheep and goats, and it can be transmitted to humans by close contact with infected animals or contaminated fomites. It usually manifests as vesiculoulcerative lesions or nodules on the inoculation sites, mostly on the hands, but other sites such as the head and scalp occasionally may be involved.¹ We report the case of an orf that proliferated dramatically and became giant after total excision. It was successfully treated with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections and imiquimod cream.

Case Report

A 68-year-old man presented with a rapidly enlarging mass on the left hand that developed 4 weeks prior after close contact with a freshly slaughtered sheep during an Islamic holiday in Turkey. His medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which was diagnosed one year prior. The patient had been treated with systemic prednisolone and cyclophosphamide therapies, but his disease was in remission at the current presentation and he currently was not receiving any treatment. On physical examination, a 2-cm, exophytic, pinkish gray, weeping nodule was observed on the proximal aspect of the right thumb. Based on the clinical findings and typical anamnesis, a diagnosis of an orf was concluded. It was decided to monitor the patient without any intervention; however, because the lesion did not resolve and remained stable, he was referred to a plastic surgeon for surgical removal after 6 weeks of follow-up.

Histopathologic examination of the excision specimen revealed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, massive capillary proliferation, and viral cytopathic changes in keratinocytes characterized by ballooning degeneration and eosinophilic cytoplasmic inclusions, which was consistent with the clinical diagnosis of an orf. Unfortunately, the lesion relapsed rapidly following excision (Figure, A). Treatment with oral valacyclovir (1 g 3 times daily) and imiquimod cream 5% (3 times weekly) was initiated. However, this treatment was unsuccessful and was discontinued after 6 weeks, as the lesion kept growing, reaching a diameter of approximately 5 cm and becoming lobulated on the surface (Figure, B). Combination therapy was started with imiquimod cream 5% (3 times weekly) and intralesional interferon alfa-2a injections (3 million IU twice weekly). The injections were so painful that the patient refused further therapy after only 2 injections. The therapy was switched from intralesional to systemic subcutaneous injections of interferon alfa-2a (3 million IU twice weekly) with concomitant imiquimod cream 5% 3 times weekly. This treatment was well tolerated by our patient with no notable side effects, except for mild fever on the night of each injection. Three weeks after the commencement of systemic injections, remarkable healing of the lesions with reduced size and exudation was noted. The frequency of injections was decreased to once weekly, which was then discontinued after 6 weeks when the lesion totally resolved (Figure, C). At 12 months’ follow-up, there were no signs of relapse.

Comment

Orf is an occupational disease that usually develops in farmers, butchers, and veterinarians; however, epidemic outbreaks of human orf are commonly observed in Turkey after the feast of sacrifice, as many individuals have close contact with the animals during sacrification.² In Turkey, orf is well recognized by dermatologists, and clinical diagnosis usually is not difficult.

Human orf has a self-limited course in which lesions spontaneously resolve in 4 to 8 weeks; however, in immunocompromised patients, such as our patient with CLL, orf lesions may be persistent, atypical, and giant, requiring early and effective treatment. Treatment options for giant orf tumors in immunocompromised individuals include surgical excision,³ cryotherapy, topical imiquimod,^4,5 topical or intralesional cidofovir,⁶ and intralesional interferon alfa injections.⁷ According to our clinical observations, surgical interventions for treatment of orfs usually cause a delay in the natural healing process; however, because surgical excision is a recommended treatment option for exophytic and recalcitrant orfs, we decided to treat our patient with surgical excision, which resulted in rapid recurrence and massive proliferation. A similar case of giant orf that was aggravated after surgery has been reported.⁸ In light of these cases, it is our opinion that treatment options other than surgery may be reasonable.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia may show features of both humoral and cell-mediated deficiency. Patients are known to be prone to viral infections such as varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, and human papillomavirus. A giant orf infection on the background of CLL also has been described.⁹

Interferons were first discovered in 1957 and named after their ability to interfere with viral replication. They represent a family of cytokines that has an essential role in the innate immune response to virus infections. Because of their antiviral properties, recombinant forms of interferon alfa are widely used with success in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections. A few other antiviral clinical applications of interferon alfa include infections caused by human herpesvirus 8 (the etiological agent in Kaposi sarcoma) and human papillomatosis virus (the etiological agent in juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis and condyloma acuminatum).¹⁰

In a report by Ran et al,⁷ intralesional interferon alfa injections were successfully used for treatment of giant orf lesions in an immunocompromised patient. As a result, we started treating the patient with intralesional interferon alfa-2a, but it was not well tolerated by our patient, as it was quite painful. We then decided to continue the therapy with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections, as we believed that it was a good option due to its antiviral, antiproliferative, and antiangiogenic properties. With the experimental combined therapy of systemic interferon alfa-2a and topical imiquimod, our patient achieved a complete response in 9 weeks (3 weeks of twice weekly injections and then 6 weeks of once weekly injections) and had no relapses during 12 months of follow-up.

Conclusion

We present a rare case of a giant orf treated with systemic interferon alfa-2a injections. Because intralesional injections are quite painful, systemic subcutaneous injections of interferon might be a good and safe alternative for recalcitrant orf lesions in immunocompromised patients. However, more studies and reports are needed to confirm its effectiveness and safety.

The 9th Cosmetic Surgery Forum will be held November 29-December 2, 2017, in Las Vegas, Nevada. Get more information at www.cosmeticsurgeryforum.com.

The Diagnosis: Disseminate and Recurrent Infundibulofolliculitis

A punch biopsy of a representative lesion on the trunk was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed a chronic lymphohistiocytic proliferation, focal spongiosis, and lymphocytic exocytosis primarily involving the isthmus of the hair follicle (Figure 1). At the follicular opening there was associated parakeratosis of the adjacent epidermis (Figure 2). Given these clinical and histopathological findings, a diagnosis of disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis (DRIF) was made.

Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis was first described by Hitch and Lund¹ in 1968 in a healthy 27-year-old black man as a widespread recurrent follicular eruption. Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis usually affects young adult males with darkly pigmented skin.^2,3 It has less commonly been described in children, females, and white individuals.^3,4 Associations with atopy, systemic diseases, or medications are unknown.^3-6 The onset usually is sudden and the disease course may be characterized by intermittent recurrences. Pruritus usually is reported but may be mild.⁵

Histopathology is characterized by spongiosis centered on the infundibulum of the hair follicle and a primarily lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate. Neutrophils also may be identified.³ Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis can be differentiated histologically from clinically similar entities such as keratosis pilaris, which has a keratin plug filling the infundibulum; lichen nitidus, which is characterized by a clawlike downgrowth of the rete ridges surrounding a central foci of inflammation; or folliculitis, which is characterized by perifollicular suppurative inflammation.

Treatment of DRIF is anecdotal and limited to case reports. Vitamin A alone or in combination with vitamin E has been reported to lead to some improvement.⁵ Tetracycline-class antibiotics, keratolytics, antihistamines, and topical retinoids have not been successful, and mixed results have been seen with topical steroids.^5-7 There is a reported case of improvement with a 3-week regimen of psoralen plus UVA followed by twice-weekly maintenance.⁸ Promising results in the treatment of DRIF have been shown with oral isotretinoin once daily.^3-5 Finally, DRIF may resolve independently⁶; therefore, treatment of DRIF should be addressed on a case-by-case basis.

The Diagnosis: Disseminate and Recurrent Infundibulofolliculitis

A punch biopsy of a representative lesion on the trunk was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed a chronic lymphohistiocytic proliferation, focal spongiosis, and lymphocytic exocytosis primarily involving the isthmus of the hair follicle (Figure 1). At the follicular opening there was associated parakeratosis of the adjacent epidermis (Figure 2). Given these clinical and histopathological findings, a diagnosis of disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis (DRIF) was made.

Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis was first described by Hitch and Lund¹ in 1968 in a healthy 27-year-old black man as a widespread recurrent follicular eruption. Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis usually affects young adult males with darkly pigmented skin.^2,3 It has less commonly been described in children, females, and white individuals.^3,4 Associations with atopy, systemic diseases, or medications are unknown.^3-6 The onset usually is sudden and the disease course may be characterized by intermittent recurrences. Pruritus usually is reported but may be mild.⁵

Histopathology is characterized by spongiosis centered on the infundibulum of the hair follicle and a primarily lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate. Neutrophils also may be identified.³ Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis can be differentiated histologically from clinically similar entities such as keratosis pilaris, which has a keratin plug filling the infundibulum; lichen nitidus, which is characterized by a clawlike downgrowth of the rete ridges surrounding a central foci of inflammation; or folliculitis, which is characterized by perifollicular suppurative inflammation.

Treatment of DRIF is anecdotal and limited to case reports. Vitamin A alone or in combination with vitamin E has been reported to lead to some improvement.⁵ Tetracycline-class antibiotics, keratolytics, antihistamines, and topical retinoids have not been successful, and mixed results have been seen with topical steroids.^5-7 There is a reported case of improvement with a 3-week regimen of psoralen plus UVA followed by twice-weekly maintenance.⁸ Promising results in the treatment of DRIF have been shown with oral isotretinoin once daily.^3-5 Finally, DRIF may resolve independently⁶; therefore, treatment of DRIF should be addressed on a case-by-case basis.

The Diagnosis: Disseminate and Recurrent Infundibulofolliculitis

A punch biopsy of a representative lesion on the trunk was performed. Histopathologic examination revealed a chronic lymphohistiocytic proliferation, focal spongiosis, and lymphocytic exocytosis primarily involving the isthmus of the hair follicle (Figure 1). At the follicular opening there was associated parakeratosis of the adjacent epidermis (Figure 2). Given these clinical and histopathological findings, a diagnosis of disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis (DRIF) was made.

Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis was first described by Hitch and Lund¹ in 1968 in a healthy 27-year-old black man as a widespread recurrent follicular eruption. Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis usually affects young adult males with darkly pigmented skin.^2,3 It has less commonly been described in children, females, and white individuals.^3,4 Associations with atopy, systemic diseases, or medications are unknown.^3-6 The onset usually is sudden and the disease course may be characterized by intermittent recurrences. Pruritus usually is reported but may be mild.⁵

Histopathology is characterized by spongiosis centered on the infundibulum of the hair follicle and a primarily lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrate. Neutrophils also may be identified.³ Disseminate and recurrent infundibulofolliculitis can be differentiated histologically from clinically similar entities such as keratosis pilaris, which has a keratin plug filling the infundibulum; lichen nitidus, which is characterized by a clawlike downgrowth of the rete ridges surrounding a central foci of inflammation; or folliculitis, which is characterized by perifollicular suppurative inflammation.

Treatment of DRIF is anecdotal and limited to case reports. Vitamin A alone or in combination with vitamin E has been reported to lead to some improvement.⁵ Tetracycline-class antibiotics, keratolytics, antihistamines, and topical retinoids have not been successful, and mixed results have been seen with topical steroids.^5-7 There is a reported case of improvement with a 3-week regimen of psoralen plus UVA followed by twice-weekly maintenance.⁸ Promising results in the treatment of DRIF have been shown with oral isotretinoin once daily.^3-5 Finally, DRIF may resolve independently⁶; therefore, treatment of DRIF should be addressed on a case-by-case basis.

To the Editor:

Granulomatous cheilitis (GC), also known as Miescher cheilitis, belongs to a larger class of diseases known as orofacial granulomatoses (OFGs), a set of diseases distinguished by their clinical and pathologic features of facial edema and granulomatous inflammation.^1-3 Granulomatous cheilitis, a monosymptomatic variant of a more extensive disease known as Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome (MRS), presents with labial swelling mimicking angioedema. Timely diagnosis of GC and MRS reduces the number of unnecessary tests, health care costs, and unnecessary patient burden. We present a case of idiopathic persistent swelling of the upper lip that was originally misdiagnosed as angioedema.

A 13-year-old white adolescent boy was referred to the allergy-immunology clinic for an alternate opinion regarding a presumed diagnosis of angioedema. He presented with prominent persistent swelling of the upper lip of 1 year’s duration associated with fissuring and discomfort while eating, which led to weight loss of more than 4.5 kg. The patient denied any history of facial asymmetry, paralysis, dental infections, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms. Additionally, he was not on any medications. His parents reported variable symptomatic worsening associated with egg ingestion, but avoiding egg did not provide any symptomatic relief. The swelling was unresponsive to multiple and prolonged courses of antihistamines and oral glucocorticoids. The patient’s medical history revealed no similar episodes of unexplained swelling, and family history was negative for angioedema. On examination, the upper lip was tender with a firm rubbery consistency. No other areas of swelling were noted. Angular cheilosis and minor labial mucosal ulcerations also were observed (Figure).

The persistent nature of the lip swelling and findings of fissures were not consistent with angioedema. Furthermore, prior laboratory studies did not reveal evidence of hereditary or acquired angioedema, and a complete blood cell count with differential was within reference range. Although the clinical suspicion for egg allergy was low, a blood test for serum-specific IgE showed a mild reactivity to egg allergen. The patient was referred to an oral surgeon for biopsy, which revealed dermal foci of noncaseating granulomas consistent with the preliminary diagnosis of GC.

Intralesional triamcinolone injections were initiated with marked improvement. Shortly after the initial improvement, however, the symptoms recurred, which necessitated several additional intralesional triamcinolone injections, again with remarkable improvement. Approximately 1.5 years later, the patient presented with recurrence of the lip swelling and admitted to having episodic diarrhea and abdominal cramps. He was referred to a pediatric gastroenterologist and a colonoscopy with biopsy confirmed Crohn disease. He was started on azathioprine followed by infliximab. A few months after this treatment was initiated, both his lip swelling and gastrointestinal tract symptoms remarkably improved. He has been maintained on this regimen and in the most recent follow-up had no recurrence of GC. He is scheduled to have another colonoscopy.

Granulomatous cheilitis is a rare chronic inflammatory condition characterized clinically by persistent lip swelling and histologically by granulomatous inflammation in the absence of systemic granulomatous disorders.⁴ Granulomatous cheilitis falls under the umbrella of OFGs. When it is paired with facial paralysis and fissuring of the tongue, it is specifically referred to as MRS. The prevalence of GC has historically been difficult to ascertain. In a review, an estimated incidence of 0.08% in the general population was reported with no predilection for race, sex, or age.^4,5 Initially, the swelling of GC can be misdiagnosed as angioedema; therefore, it is imperative to include OFG and GC in the differential diagnosis of facial angioedema.³ Other possible diagnoses to consider include contact dermatitis, foreign-body reactions, infection, and reactions to medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.⁵ Chronic lymphedema and other granulomatous diseases also should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Isolated lymphedema of the head and neck, though rare, typically is seen following surgical or radiological interventions for cancer. Lymphatic fibrosis also can occur in the setting of chronic inflammatory skin conditions but is not typically the first presenting symptom, as was seen in our patient.⁶ Although granulomatous diseases such as sarcoidosis may be difficult to clinically and histologically differentiate from GC, isolated orofacial swelling in sarcoidosis is rare. If clinical suspicion for sarcoidosis does exist, however, a negative chest radiograph as well as serum calcium and angiotensin-converting enzyme levels within reference range may help differentiate GC from sarcoidosis. In our patient, the clinical suspicion for sarcoidosis was low given his clinical history, young age, and race.

The etiology of MRS and GC currently is unknown. Genetic factors, food allergies, infectious processes, and aberrant immunologic functions all have been proposed as possible mechanisms.^1-3,7,8 Genetic factors, such as HLA antigen subtypes, have been investigated but have not shown a definitive correlation.⁸ Numerous food allergens have been suggested as causative factors in OFG via a type of delayed hypersensitivity reaction,⁷ with cinnamon and benzoate reported as 2 of the most cited entities.^9,10 Currently, it is believed that both of these mechanisms may play an exacerbating role to an otherwise unknown disease process.^7,8 The infectious process most often associated with GC is Mycobacterium tuberculosis; however, similar to genetics and food allergens, causality has not been determined.^4,7 At the present time, the best evidence points to an immunologic basis of GC with the inciting event being a random influx of inflammatory cells.^7,11

There is a known association between GC and Crohn disease, especially when oral lesions are present.^1,9 Granulomatous cheilitis can be considered an extraintestinal manifestation of Crohn disease.Up to 20% of OFG patients eventually go on to develop Crohn disease, with some reports being even higher when OFG presents in childhood.^1,9 One study proposed that both GC and Crohn disease patients shared similar histopathologic and immunopathologic features including a helper T cell (T_H1)–predominant inflammatory reaction.¹¹

The treatment of GC is challenging, with most evidence coming from sporadic case reports. Given the relatively high rate of cinnamon and benzoate hypersensitivity seen in GC patients, it has been postulated that a diet lacking in them will improve the disease. At least one study has reported positive clinical outcomes from diets lacking in cinnamon and benzoate and in fact recommended it as a potential first-line treatment.¹⁰ The mainstay of treatment, however, is corticosteroids, but continued use is discouraged due to their large side-effect profile.¹² Currently, the most agreed upon treatment for patients with isolated GC is intralesional triamcinolone injections.¹² Despite the robust initial response often seen with triamcinolone injections, it is not uncommon for the benefit to be short-lived, requiring additional treatments.^1,5,12 Newer medical therapies that have shown promise largely are centered on anti–tumor necrosis factor α medications such as infliximab and adalimumab.^13,14 It is postulated that due to the potential overlapping pathophysiology between Crohn disease and GC, there may be utility in using the same treatments.¹³ In situations where medical therapy fails or in extremely disfiguring cases of GC and MRS, surgical cheiloplasty is performed to reduce lip size and improve cosmetic appearance.¹² In a small study, reduction cheiloplasty gave satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes in all 7 patients reviewed at a median follow-up of 6.5 years.¹⁵

This case emphasizes the importance of paying close attention to history and physical examination features in developing any differential diagnosis. In this patient, persistent orofacial swelling with associated mucosal ulcerations were sufficient to exclude drug-induced, idiopathic, hereditary, and acquired angioedema. The clinical history coupled with the biopsy results yielded a confident diagnosis of GC. Furthermore, similar presentations should raise concern for a subclinical inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn disease.

To the Editor:

Granulomatous cheilitis (GC), also known as Miescher cheilitis, belongs to a larger class of diseases known as orofacial granulomatoses (OFGs), a set of diseases distinguished by their clinical and pathologic features of facial edema and granulomatous inflammation.^1-3 Granulomatous cheilitis, a monosymptomatic variant of a more extensive disease known as Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome (MRS), presents with labial swelling mimicking angioedema. Timely diagnosis of GC and MRS reduces the number of unnecessary tests, health care costs, and unnecessary patient burden. We present a case of idiopathic persistent swelling of the upper lip that was originally misdiagnosed as angioedema.

A 13-year-old white adolescent boy was referred to the allergy-immunology clinic for an alternate opinion regarding a presumed diagnosis of angioedema. He presented with prominent persistent swelling of the upper lip of 1 year’s duration associated with fissuring and discomfort while eating, which led to weight loss of more than 4.5 kg. The patient denied any history of facial asymmetry, paralysis, dental infections, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms. Additionally, he was not on any medications. His parents reported variable symptomatic worsening associated with egg ingestion, but avoiding egg did not provide any symptomatic relief. The swelling was unresponsive to multiple and prolonged courses of antihistamines and oral glucocorticoids. The patient’s medical history revealed no similar episodes of unexplained swelling, and family history was negative for angioedema. On examination, the upper lip was tender with a firm rubbery consistency. No other areas of swelling were noted. Angular cheilosis and minor labial mucosal ulcerations also were observed (Figure).

The persistent nature of the lip swelling and findings of fissures were not consistent with angioedema. Furthermore, prior laboratory studies did not reveal evidence of hereditary or acquired angioedema, and a complete blood cell count with differential was within reference range. Although the clinical suspicion for egg allergy was low, a blood test for serum-specific IgE showed a mild reactivity to egg allergen. The patient was referred to an oral surgeon for biopsy, which revealed dermal foci of noncaseating granulomas consistent with the preliminary diagnosis of GC.

Intralesional triamcinolone injections were initiated with marked improvement. Shortly after the initial improvement, however, the symptoms recurred, which necessitated several additional intralesional triamcinolone injections, again with remarkable improvement. Approximately 1.5 years later, the patient presented with recurrence of the lip swelling and admitted to having episodic diarrhea and abdominal cramps. He was referred to a pediatric gastroenterologist and a colonoscopy with biopsy confirmed Crohn disease. He was started on azathioprine followed by infliximab. A few months after this treatment was initiated, both his lip swelling and gastrointestinal tract symptoms remarkably improved. He has been maintained on this regimen and in the most recent follow-up had no recurrence of GC. He is scheduled to have another colonoscopy.

Granulomatous cheilitis is a rare chronic inflammatory condition characterized clinically by persistent lip swelling and histologically by granulomatous inflammation in the absence of systemic granulomatous disorders.⁴ Granulomatous cheilitis falls under the umbrella of OFGs. When it is paired with facial paralysis and fissuring of the tongue, it is specifically referred to as MRS. The prevalence of GC has historically been difficult to ascertain. In a review, an estimated incidence of 0.08% in the general population was reported with no predilection for race, sex, or age.^4,5 Initially, the swelling of GC can be misdiagnosed as angioedema; therefore, it is imperative to include OFG and GC in the differential diagnosis of facial angioedema.³ Other possible diagnoses to consider include contact dermatitis, foreign-body reactions, infection, and reactions to medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.⁵ Chronic lymphedema and other granulomatous diseases also should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Isolated lymphedema of the head and neck, though rare, typically is seen following surgical or radiological interventions for cancer. Lymphatic fibrosis also can occur in the setting of chronic inflammatory skin conditions but is not typically the first presenting symptom, as was seen in our patient.⁶ Although granulomatous diseases such as sarcoidosis may be difficult to clinically and histologically differentiate from GC, isolated orofacial swelling in sarcoidosis is rare. If clinical suspicion for sarcoidosis does exist, however, a negative chest radiograph as well as serum calcium and angiotensin-converting enzyme levels within reference range may help differentiate GC from sarcoidosis. In our patient, the clinical suspicion for sarcoidosis was low given his clinical history, young age, and race.

The etiology of MRS and GC currently is unknown. Genetic factors, food allergies, infectious processes, and aberrant immunologic functions all have been proposed as possible mechanisms.^1-3,7,8 Genetic factors, such as HLA antigen subtypes, have been investigated but have not shown a definitive correlation.⁸ Numerous food allergens have been suggested as causative factors in OFG via a type of delayed hypersensitivity reaction,⁷ with cinnamon and benzoate reported as 2 of the most cited entities.^9,10 Currently, it is believed that both of these mechanisms may play an exacerbating role to an otherwise unknown disease process.^7,8 The infectious process most often associated with GC is Mycobacterium tuberculosis; however, similar to genetics and food allergens, causality has not been determined.^4,7 At the present time, the best evidence points to an immunologic basis of GC with the inciting event being a random influx of inflammatory cells.^7,11

There is a known association between GC and Crohn disease, especially when oral lesions are present.^1,9 Granulomatous cheilitis can be considered an extraintestinal manifestation of Crohn disease.Up to 20% of OFG patients eventually go on to develop Crohn disease, with some reports being even higher when OFG presents in childhood.^1,9 One study proposed that both GC and Crohn disease patients shared similar histopathologic and immunopathologic features including a helper T cell (T_H1)–predominant inflammatory reaction.¹¹

The treatment of GC is challenging, with most evidence coming from sporadic case reports. Given the relatively high rate of cinnamon and benzoate hypersensitivity seen in GC patients, it has been postulated that a diet lacking in them will improve the disease. At least one study has reported positive clinical outcomes from diets lacking in cinnamon and benzoate and in fact recommended it as a potential first-line treatment.¹⁰ The mainstay of treatment, however, is corticosteroids, but continued use is discouraged due to their large side-effect profile.¹² Currently, the most agreed upon treatment for patients with isolated GC is intralesional triamcinolone injections.¹² Despite the robust initial response often seen with triamcinolone injections, it is not uncommon for the benefit to be short-lived, requiring additional treatments.^1,5,12 Newer medical therapies that have shown promise largely are centered on anti–tumor necrosis factor α medications such as infliximab and adalimumab.^13,14 It is postulated that due to the potential overlapping pathophysiology between Crohn disease and GC, there may be utility in using the same treatments.¹³ In situations where medical therapy fails or in extremely disfiguring cases of GC and MRS, surgical cheiloplasty is performed to reduce lip size and improve cosmetic appearance.¹² In a small study, reduction cheiloplasty gave satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes in all 7 patients reviewed at a median follow-up of 6.5 years.¹⁵

This case emphasizes the importance of paying close attention to history and physical examination features in developing any differential diagnosis. In this patient, persistent orofacial swelling with associated mucosal ulcerations were sufficient to exclude drug-induced, idiopathic, hereditary, and acquired angioedema. The clinical history coupled with the biopsy results yielded a confident diagnosis of GC. Furthermore, similar presentations should raise concern for a subclinical inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn disease.

To the Editor:

Granulomatous cheilitis (GC), also known as Miescher cheilitis, belongs to a larger class of diseases known as orofacial granulomatoses (OFGs), a set of diseases distinguished by their clinical and pathologic features of facial edema and granulomatous inflammation.^1-3 Granulomatous cheilitis, a monosymptomatic variant of a more extensive disease known as Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome (MRS), presents with labial swelling mimicking angioedema. Timely diagnosis of GC and MRS reduces the number of unnecessary tests, health care costs, and unnecessary patient burden. We present a case of idiopathic persistent swelling of the upper lip that was originally misdiagnosed as angioedema.

A 13-year-old white adolescent boy was referred to the allergy-immunology clinic for an alternate opinion regarding a presumed diagnosis of angioedema. He presented with prominent persistent swelling of the upper lip of 1 year’s duration associated with fissuring and discomfort while eating, which led to weight loss of more than 4.5 kg. The patient denied any history of facial asymmetry, paralysis, dental infections, or gastrointestinal tract symptoms. Additionally, he was not on any medications. His parents reported variable symptomatic worsening associated with egg ingestion, but avoiding egg did not provide any symptomatic relief. The swelling was unresponsive to multiple and prolonged courses of antihistamines and oral glucocorticoids. The patient’s medical history revealed no similar episodes of unexplained swelling, and family history was negative for angioedema. On examination, the upper lip was tender with a firm rubbery consistency. No other areas of swelling were noted. Angular cheilosis and minor labial mucosal ulcerations also were observed (Figure).

The persistent nature of the lip swelling and findings of fissures were not consistent with angioedema. Furthermore, prior laboratory studies did not reveal evidence of hereditary or acquired angioedema, and a complete blood cell count with differential was within reference range. Although the clinical suspicion for egg allergy was low, a blood test for serum-specific IgE showed a mild reactivity to egg allergen. The patient was referred to an oral surgeon for biopsy, which revealed dermal foci of noncaseating granulomas consistent with the preliminary diagnosis of GC.

Intralesional triamcinolone injections were initiated with marked improvement. Shortly after the initial improvement, however, the symptoms recurred, which necessitated several additional intralesional triamcinolone injections, again with remarkable improvement. Approximately 1.5 years later, the patient presented with recurrence of the lip swelling and admitted to having episodic diarrhea and abdominal cramps. He was referred to a pediatric gastroenterologist and a colonoscopy with biopsy confirmed Crohn disease. He was started on azathioprine followed by infliximab. A few months after this treatment was initiated, both his lip swelling and gastrointestinal tract symptoms remarkably improved. He has been maintained on this regimen and in the most recent follow-up had no recurrence of GC. He is scheduled to have another colonoscopy.

Granulomatous cheilitis is a rare chronic inflammatory condition characterized clinically by persistent lip swelling and histologically by granulomatous inflammation in the absence of systemic granulomatous disorders.⁴ Granulomatous cheilitis falls under the umbrella of OFGs. When it is paired with facial paralysis and fissuring of the tongue, it is specifically referred to as MRS. The prevalence of GC has historically been difficult to ascertain. In a review, an estimated incidence of 0.08% in the general population was reported with no predilection for race, sex, or age.^4,5 Initially, the swelling of GC can be misdiagnosed as angioedema; therefore, it is imperative to include OFG and GC in the differential diagnosis of facial angioedema.³ Other possible diagnoses to consider include contact dermatitis, foreign-body reactions, infection, and reactions to medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.⁵ Chronic lymphedema and other granulomatous diseases also should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Isolated lymphedema of the head and neck, though rare, typically is seen following surgical or radiological interventions for cancer. Lymphatic fibrosis also can occur in the setting of chronic inflammatory skin conditions but is not typically the first presenting symptom, as was seen in our patient.⁶ Although granulomatous diseases such as sarcoidosis may be difficult to clinically and histologically differentiate from GC, isolated orofacial swelling in sarcoidosis is rare. If clinical suspicion for sarcoidosis does exist, however, a negative chest radiograph as well as serum calcium and angiotensin-converting enzyme levels within reference range may help differentiate GC from sarcoidosis. In our patient, the clinical suspicion for sarcoidosis was low given his clinical history, young age, and race.

The etiology of MRS and GC currently is unknown. Genetic factors, food allergies, infectious processes, and aberrant immunologic functions all have been proposed as possible mechanisms.^1-3,7,8 Genetic factors, such as HLA antigen subtypes, have been investigated but have not shown a definitive correlation.⁸ Numerous food allergens have been suggested as causative factors in OFG via a type of delayed hypersensitivity reaction,⁷ with cinnamon and benzoate reported as 2 of the most cited entities.^9,10 Currently, it is believed that both of these mechanisms may play an exacerbating role to an otherwise unknown disease process.^7,8 The infectious process most often associated with GC is Mycobacterium tuberculosis; however, similar to genetics and food allergens, causality has not been determined.^4,7 At the present time, the best evidence points to an immunologic basis of GC with the inciting event being a random influx of inflammatory cells.^7,11

There is a known association between GC and Crohn disease, especially when oral lesions are present.^1,9 Granulomatous cheilitis can be considered an extraintestinal manifestation of Crohn disease.Up to 20% of OFG patients eventually go on to develop Crohn disease, with some reports being even higher when OFG presents in childhood.^1,9 One study proposed that both GC and Crohn disease patients shared similar histopathologic and immunopathologic features including a helper T cell (T_H1)–predominant inflammatory reaction.¹¹

The treatment of GC is challenging, with most evidence coming from sporadic case reports. Given the relatively high rate of cinnamon and benzoate hypersensitivity seen in GC patients, it has been postulated that a diet lacking in them will improve the disease. At least one study has reported positive clinical outcomes from diets lacking in cinnamon and benzoate and in fact recommended it as a potential first-line treatment.¹⁰ The mainstay of treatment, however, is corticosteroids, but continued use is discouraged due to their large side-effect profile.¹² Currently, the most agreed upon treatment for patients with isolated GC is intralesional triamcinolone injections.¹² Despite the robust initial response often seen with triamcinolone injections, it is not uncommon for the benefit to be short-lived, requiring additional treatments.^1,5,12 Newer medical therapies that have shown promise largely are centered on anti–tumor necrosis factor α medications such as infliximab and adalimumab.^13,14 It is postulated that due to the potential overlapping pathophysiology between Crohn disease and GC, there may be utility in using the same treatments.¹³ In situations where medical therapy fails or in extremely disfiguring cases of GC and MRS, surgical cheiloplasty is performed to reduce lip size and improve cosmetic appearance.¹² In a small study, reduction cheiloplasty gave satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes in all 7 patients reviewed at a median follow-up of 6.5 years.¹⁵

This case emphasizes the importance of paying close attention to history and physical examination features in developing any differential diagnosis. In this patient, persistent orofacial swelling with associated mucosal ulcerations were sufficient to exclude drug-induced, idiopathic, hereditary, and acquired angioedema. The clinical history coupled with the biopsy results yielded a confident diagnosis of GC. Furthermore, similar presentations should raise concern for a subclinical inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn disease.

Myth: Moisturizers Make Acne Worse in Patients With Oily Skin

Excessive sebum production can lead to oily skin that appears greasy and shiny, which contributes to the development of acne on the face. Acne patients with oily skin may be deterred from using moisturizers out of fear that their condition will worsen, yet therapeutic moisturizers have been shown to maintain hydration and overall integrity of the stratum corneum.

In a study of patient experiences with oily skin, 68% (n=37) of participants said their skin felt unclean, dirty, or grimy. Some participants noted a feeling of having clogged pores or an additional layer of skin, and others reported that their skin felt oily or greasy to the touch. The study also reported that participants with oily skin felt self-conscious, which impacted their daily life. These domains also are affected by having acne.

In the same study, 18% (n=10) of participants reported washing their face 6 to 15 times per day, 50% (n=27) washed their face 3 to 5 times per day, and 42% (n=23) washed their face 1 to 2 times per day. Instead of applying heavy moisturizers, acne patients with oily skin may feel the need to constantly wash their face. Gentle face washing is recommended to help improve and prevent acne, but patients who wash their face excessively are at risk for skin barrier impairment and development of dry skin.

Acne patients can use noncomedogenic moisturizers to prevent and alleviate skin irritation and soothe the skin by slowing the evaporation of water. Many moisturizers on the market claim to be suitable for acne treatment and may independently contribute to improving the signs and symptoms of acne. It is important for dermatologists to direct patients with oily skin to oil-free moisturizers containing ingredients such as dimethicone, which is known to reduce transepidermal water loss without a greasy feel and contains both occlusive and emollient properties. Dimethicone is suitable for use in patients with acne and sensitive skin and is noncomedogenic and hypoallergenic. Many oil-free moisturizers also contain certain metals and botanical extracts, such as aloe vera and witch hazel, that are known to have anti-inflammatory and skin-soothing properties. Some liquid face cleansers also moisturize, which may be all that is needed in patients with oily skin.

It also is important to inform patients with oily skin that common acne treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, retinoids, salicylic acid, and oral isotretinoin commonly cause dry skin or irritation, leading to barrier disruption in the stratum corneum and subsequently causing increased transepidermal water loss and inflammation. Concomitant use of noncomedogenic moisturizers can enhance treatment efficacy, alleviate dryness, and improve skin comfort in acne patients who are taking these medications.

Expert Commentary

An often forgotten element of acne vulgaris is that it is in fact a disease of barrier dysfunction and disruption. As mentioned above, many of the medications used to treat this chronic inflammatory disease are either directly cytotoxic to keratinocytes (benzoyl peroxide) or alter the thickness and composition of the stratum corneum (retinoids), impairing its protective functions. The inflammatory cascade associated with acne itself can impair the barrier, synergizing with the array of aforementioned medications. Both etiological factors disrupt an often overlooked yet crucial component of the skin barrier, the cutaneous microbiota. The altered landscape, or petri dish if you will, unhinges the balance between the >500 species of organisms living in harmony on the skin, decreasing bacterial diversity and facilitating the overgrowth of specific organisms, here specifically certain types of Propionibacterium acnes, which contribute to the ongoing inflammatory cascade. If that's not enough, sebum, which is certainly in excess in acne, contributes very little to barrier function and skin hydration but can be used to cause a different form of disruption by P acnes, which when converted into short-chain fatty acids can impair cutaneous immune tolerance ultimately creating, you guessed it, more inflammation (thank Dr. Rich Gallo for tying this all together). All in all, the barrier is a mess, highlighting the need for barrier repair with a moisturizer to restore the "balance" on every level: Repair and replace the stratum corneum, restore the tools for the right bacteria to grow (water, carbs, lipids, etc). Moisturizers are a must in acne!

—Adam Friedman, MD (Washington, DC)

Myth: Moisturizers Make Acne Worse in Patients With Oily Skin

Excessive sebum production can lead to oily skin that appears greasy and shiny, which contributes to the development of acne on the face. Acne patients with oily skin may be deterred from using moisturizers out of fear that their condition will worsen, yet therapeutic moisturizers have been shown to maintain hydration and overall integrity of the stratum corneum.

In a study of patient experiences with oily skin, 68% (n=37) of participants said their skin felt unclean, dirty, or grimy. Some participants noted a feeling of having clogged pores or an additional layer of skin, and others reported that their skin felt oily or greasy to the touch. The study also reported that participants with oily skin felt self-conscious, which impacted their daily life. These domains also are affected by having acne.

In the same study, 18% (n=10) of participants reported washing their face 6 to 15 times per day, 50% (n=27) washed their face 3 to 5 times per day, and 42% (n=23) washed their face 1 to 2 times per day. Instead of applying heavy moisturizers, acne patients with oily skin may feel the need to constantly wash their face. Gentle face washing is recommended to help improve and prevent acne, but patients who wash their face excessively are at risk for skin barrier impairment and development of dry skin.

Acne patients can use noncomedogenic moisturizers to prevent and alleviate skin irritation and soothe the skin by slowing the evaporation of water. Many moisturizers on the market claim to be suitable for acne treatment and may independently contribute to improving the signs and symptoms of acne. It is important for dermatologists to direct patients with oily skin to oil-free moisturizers containing ingredients such as dimethicone, which is known to reduce transepidermal water loss without a greasy feel and contains both occlusive and emollient properties. Dimethicone is suitable for use in patients with acne and sensitive skin and is noncomedogenic and hypoallergenic. Many oil-free moisturizers also contain certain metals and botanical extracts, such as aloe vera and witch hazel, that are known to have anti-inflammatory and skin-soothing properties. Some liquid face cleansers also moisturize, which may be all that is needed in patients with oily skin.

It also is important to inform patients with oily skin that common acne treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, retinoids, salicylic acid, and oral isotretinoin commonly cause dry skin or irritation, leading to barrier disruption in the stratum corneum and subsequently causing increased transepidermal water loss and inflammation. Concomitant use of noncomedogenic moisturizers can enhance treatment efficacy, alleviate dryness, and improve skin comfort in acne patients who are taking these medications.

Expert Commentary

An often forgotten element of acne vulgaris is that it is in fact a disease of barrier dysfunction and disruption. As mentioned above, many of the medications used to treat this chronic inflammatory disease are either directly cytotoxic to keratinocytes (benzoyl peroxide) or alter the thickness and composition of the stratum corneum (retinoids), impairing its protective functions. The inflammatory cascade associated with acne itself can impair the barrier, synergizing with the array of aforementioned medications. Both etiological factors disrupt an often overlooked yet crucial component of the skin barrier, the cutaneous microbiota. The altered landscape, or petri dish if you will, unhinges the balance between the >500 species of organisms living in harmony on the skin, decreasing bacterial diversity and facilitating the overgrowth of specific organisms, here specifically certain types of Propionibacterium acnes, which contribute to the ongoing inflammatory cascade. If that's not enough, sebum, which is certainly in excess in acne, contributes very little to barrier function and skin hydration but can be used to cause a different form of disruption by P acnes, which when converted into short-chain fatty acids can impair cutaneous immune tolerance ultimately creating, you guessed it, more inflammation (thank Dr. Rich Gallo for tying this all together). All in all, the barrier is a mess, highlighting the need for barrier repair with a moisturizer to restore the "balance" on every level: Repair and replace the stratum corneum, restore the tools for the right bacteria to grow (water, carbs, lipids, etc). Moisturizers are a must in acne!

—Adam Friedman, MD (Washington, DC)

Myth: Moisturizers Make Acne Worse in Patients With Oily Skin

Excessive sebum production can lead to oily skin that appears greasy and shiny, which contributes to the development of acne on the face. Acne patients with oily skin may be deterred from using moisturizers out of fear that their condition will worsen, yet therapeutic moisturizers have been shown to maintain hydration and overall integrity of the stratum corneum.

In a study of patient experiences with oily skin, 68% (n=37) of participants said their skin felt unclean, dirty, or grimy. Some participants noted a feeling of having clogged pores or an additional layer of skin, and others reported that their skin felt oily or greasy to the touch. The study also reported that participants with oily skin felt self-conscious, which impacted their daily life. These domains also are affected by having acne.

In the same study, 18% (n=10) of participants reported washing their face 6 to 15 times per day, 50% (n=27) washed their face 3 to 5 times per day, and 42% (n=23) washed their face 1 to 2 times per day. Instead of applying heavy moisturizers, acne patients with oily skin may feel the need to constantly wash their face. Gentle face washing is recommended to help improve and prevent acne, but patients who wash their face excessively are at risk for skin barrier impairment and development of dry skin.

Acne patients can use noncomedogenic moisturizers to prevent and alleviate skin irritation and soothe the skin by slowing the evaporation of water. Many moisturizers on the market claim to be suitable for acne treatment and may independently contribute to improving the signs and symptoms of acne. It is important for dermatologists to direct patients with oily skin to oil-free moisturizers containing ingredients such as dimethicone, which is known to reduce transepidermal water loss without a greasy feel and contains both occlusive and emollient properties. Dimethicone is suitable for use in patients with acne and sensitive skin and is noncomedogenic and hypoallergenic. Many oil-free moisturizers also contain certain metals and botanical extracts, such as aloe vera and witch hazel, that are known to have anti-inflammatory and skin-soothing properties. Some liquid face cleansers also moisturize, which may be all that is needed in patients with oily skin.

It also is important to inform patients with oily skin that common acne treatments such as benzoyl peroxide, retinoids, salicylic acid, and oral isotretinoin commonly cause dry skin or irritation, leading to barrier disruption in the stratum corneum and subsequently causing increased transepidermal water loss and inflammation. Concomitant use of noncomedogenic moisturizers can enhance treatment efficacy, alleviate dryness, and improve skin comfort in acne patients who are taking these medications.

Expert Commentary

An often forgotten element of acne vulgaris is that it is in fact a disease of barrier dysfunction and disruption. As mentioned above, many of the medications used to treat this chronic inflammatory disease are either directly cytotoxic to keratinocytes (benzoyl peroxide) or alter the thickness and composition of the stratum corneum (retinoids), impairing its protective functions. The inflammatory cascade associated with acne itself can impair the barrier, synergizing with the array of aforementioned medications. Both etiological factors disrupt an often overlooked yet crucial component of the skin barrier, the cutaneous microbiota. The altered landscape, or petri dish if you will, unhinges the balance between the >500 species of organisms living in harmony on the skin, decreasing bacterial diversity and facilitating the overgrowth of specific organisms, here specifically certain types of Propionibacterium acnes, which contribute to the ongoing inflammatory cascade. If that's not enough, sebum, which is certainly in excess in acne, contributes very little to barrier function and skin hydration but can be used to cause a different form of disruption by P acnes, which when converted into short-chain fatty acids can impair cutaneous immune tolerance ultimately creating, you guessed it, more inflammation (thank Dr. Rich Gallo for tying this all together). All in all, the barrier is a mess, highlighting the need for barrier repair with a moisturizer to restore the "balance" on every level: Repair and replace the stratum corneum, restore the tools for the right bacteria to grow (water, carbs, lipids, etc). Moisturizers are a must in acne!

—Adam Friedman, MD (Washington, DC)