Lucas Franki is an associate editor for MDedge News, and has been with the company since 2014. He has a BA in English from Penn State University and is an Eagle Scout.

Generic versions of Suboxone approved for opioid dependence

Article Type
Changed

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the first generic versions of Suboxone (buprenorphine and naloxone) sublingual film for the medication-assisted treatment of opioid dependence.

Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) combines approved medication, such as methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone, with counseling and other behavioral therapies to treat opioid use disorders. Suboxone adherence reduces opioid withdrawal symptoms, the desire to use opioid, and the pleasurable effects of opioid use. Patients who receive MAT reduce their risk of death from all causes by about 50%.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

“The FDA is taking new steps to advance the development of improved treatments for opioid use disorder and to make sure these medicines are accessible to the patients who need them. That includes promoting the development of better drugs and also facilitating market entry of generic versions of approved drugs to help ensure broader access,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in the June 14 press release.

The approval to market Suboxone generics, at multiple strengths, has been granted to Mylan Technologies and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories.

The agency said data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration show that patients who receive MAT as an intervention for opioid use reduce their risk of death from all causes by 50%.

Common adverse events associated with Suboxone include oral hypoesthesia, glossodynia, oral mucosal erythema, headache, nausea, vomiting, hyperhidrosis, constipation, signs and symptoms of withdrawal, insomnia, pain, and peripheral edema.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the first generic versions of Suboxone (buprenorphine and naloxone) sublingual film for the medication-assisted treatment of opioid dependence.

Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) combines approved medication, such as methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone, with counseling and other behavioral therapies to treat opioid use disorders. Suboxone adherence reduces opioid withdrawal symptoms, the desire to use opioid, and the pleasurable effects of opioid use. Patients who receive MAT reduce their risk of death from all causes by about 50%.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

“The FDA is taking new steps to advance the development of improved treatments for opioid use disorder and to make sure these medicines are accessible to the patients who need them. That includes promoting the development of better drugs and also facilitating market entry of generic versions of approved drugs to help ensure broader access,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in the June 14 press release.

The approval to market Suboxone generics, at multiple strengths, has been granted to Mylan Technologies and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories.

The agency said data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration show that patients who receive MAT as an intervention for opioid use reduce their risk of death from all causes by 50%.

Common adverse events associated with Suboxone include oral hypoesthesia, glossodynia, oral mucosal erythema, headache, nausea, vomiting, hyperhidrosis, constipation, signs and symptoms of withdrawal, insomnia, pain, and peripheral edema.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved the first generic versions of Suboxone (buprenorphine and naloxone) sublingual film for the medication-assisted treatment of opioid dependence.

Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) combines approved medication, such as methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone, with counseling and other behavioral therapies to treat opioid use disorders. Suboxone adherence reduces opioid withdrawal symptoms, the desire to use opioid, and the pleasurable effects of opioid use. Patients who receive MAT reduce their risk of death from all causes by about 50%.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License

“The FDA is taking new steps to advance the development of improved treatments for opioid use disorder and to make sure these medicines are accessible to the patients who need them. That includes promoting the development of better drugs and also facilitating market entry of generic versions of approved drugs to help ensure broader access,” FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD, said in the June 14 press release.

The approval to market Suboxone generics, at multiple strengths, has been granted to Mylan Technologies and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories.

The agency said data from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration show that patients who receive MAT as an intervention for opioid use reduce their risk of death from all causes by 50%.

Common adverse events associated with Suboxone include oral hypoesthesia, glossodynia, oral mucosal erythema, headache, nausea, vomiting, hyperhidrosis, constipation, signs and symptoms of withdrawal, insomnia, pain, and peripheral edema.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Benefits of nicotine preloading undercut by reduced varenicline usage

Article Type
Changed

 

Nicotine preloading with patches 4 weeks before making a quit attempt was not significantly associated with smoking abstinence, mainly because of a decline in varenicline use, according to Paul Aveyard, PhD, and his associates at Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford (England).

The primary study outcome, biochemically validated abstinence at 6 months, was achieved by 17.5% of the 899 people who preloaded with a 21-mg/24-hr nicotine patch for 4 weeks and by 14.4% of the 893 in the control group. After 1 year, 14.0% of people in the preloading group maintained long-term abstinence, compared with 11.3% in the control group. In addition, 35.5% of the preloading group and 32.3% of the control group achieved abstinence 4 weeks from baseline.

milosluz/istockphoto.com

The unadjusted odds ratio for the effect of preloading at 6 months was 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.62; P = .08) and not statistically significant. However, when reduced varenicline usage in the preloading group was taken into account, the effect of preloading did reach statistical significance (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.73; P = .03). Similar results were found at 1 year and at 4 weeks, where the preloading effect did not reach significance until adjusted for varenicline usage.

“Nicotine preloading with a 21-mg/24-hr nicotine patch for 4 weeks seems to be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated, but probably deters the use of varenicline, the most effective smoking cessation drug. If it were possible to overcome this unintended consequence, preloading could lead to a worthwhile increase in long-term smoking abstinence,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Aveyard P et al. BMJ. 2018 Jun 13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2164.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Nicotine preloading with patches 4 weeks before making a quit attempt was not significantly associated with smoking abstinence, mainly because of a decline in varenicline use, according to Paul Aveyard, PhD, and his associates at Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford (England).

The primary study outcome, biochemically validated abstinence at 6 months, was achieved by 17.5% of the 899 people who preloaded with a 21-mg/24-hr nicotine patch for 4 weeks and by 14.4% of the 893 in the control group. After 1 year, 14.0% of people in the preloading group maintained long-term abstinence, compared with 11.3% in the control group. In addition, 35.5% of the preloading group and 32.3% of the control group achieved abstinence 4 weeks from baseline.

milosluz/istockphoto.com

The unadjusted odds ratio for the effect of preloading at 6 months was 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.62; P = .08) and not statistically significant. However, when reduced varenicline usage in the preloading group was taken into account, the effect of preloading did reach statistical significance (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.73; P = .03). Similar results were found at 1 year and at 4 weeks, where the preloading effect did not reach significance until adjusted for varenicline usage.

“Nicotine preloading with a 21-mg/24-hr nicotine patch for 4 weeks seems to be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated, but probably deters the use of varenicline, the most effective smoking cessation drug. If it were possible to overcome this unintended consequence, preloading could lead to a worthwhile increase in long-term smoking abstinence,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Aveyard P et al. BMJ. 2018 Jun 13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2164.

 

Nicotine preloading with patches 4 weeks before making a quit attempt was not significantly associated with smoking abstinence, mainly because of a decline in varenicline use, according to Paul Aveyard, PhD, and his associates at Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford (England).

The primary study outcome, biochemically validated abstinence at 6 months, was achieved by 17.5% of the 899 people who preloaded with a 21-mg/24-hr nicotine patch for 4 weeks and by 14.4% of the 893 in the control group. After 1 year, 14.0% of people in the preloading group maintained long-term abstinence, compared with 11.3% in the control group. In addition, 35.5% of the preloading group and 32.3% of the control group achieved abstinence 4 weeks from baseline.

milosluz/istockphoto.com

The unadjusted odds ratio for the effect of preloading at 6 months was 1.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.62; P = .08) and not statistically significant. However, when reduced varenicline usage in the preloading group was taken into account, the effect of preloading did reach statistical significance (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03-1.73; P = .03). Similar results were found at 1 year and at 4 weeks, where the preloading effect did not reach significance until adjusted for varenicline usage.

“Nicotine preloading with a 21-mg/24-hr nicotine patch for 4 weeks seems to be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated, but probably deters the use of varenicline, the most effective smoking cessation drug. If it were possible to overcome this unintended consequence, preloading could lead to a worthwhile increase in long-term smoking abstinence,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Aveyard P et al. BMJ. 2018 Jun 13. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2164.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM THE BMJ

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Most U.S. buprenorphine prescribers assess patients for diversion

Article Type
Changed

 

Most prescribers of buprenorphine view diversion or misappropriation of the drug as a concern, and most assess their patients for diversion, according to Lewei (Allison) Lin, MD, and her associates.

In a survey of 1,174 buprenorphine prescribers conducted from July 2014 to January 2017, 79% of the prescribers reported assessing all their patients for diversion of the drug, and 79.1% reported conducting urine tests for the presence of buprenorphine. In addition, 85% of prescribers viewed diversion as a problem in their community, and 80.3% of prescribers were willing to terminate treatment because of diversion, reported Dr. Lin of the department of psychiatry at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and her associates in Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Diversion was defined as “unauthorized rerouting or misappropriation of prescribed buprenorphine to someone other than the person for whom it was intended.”

Dr. Lin and her associates found that prescribers were more likely to assess all of their patients for diversion if they viewed diversion as a problem in their community, had fewer years of experience, or were white. Urine testing was more likely if prescribers viewed diversion as a problem in their community, had more patients, had less experience, had a 100-patient waiver, or were nonpsychiatrists. Treatment termination was more likely for prescribers who had a greater percentages of patients with medication counts, viewed diversion as a problem in their community, or practiced in nonaddiction/nonpsychiatric specialties.

“Although we did not include detailed questions about termination, the high proportion of prescribers who would terminate patients for diversion is important to note,” wrote Dr. Lin, also a research investigator at the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, and her associates. Addiction medicine specialists and psychiatrists were less likely to terminate patients because of concerns about diversion – which suggests that additional training in addiction might make clinicians more comfortable managing patients with high-risk behaviors, the investigators said.

They cited several limitations. For example, the survey’s cross-sectional design makes causal inferences difficult. In addition, when the survey was conducted, physicians were the only buprenorphine prescribers. It is therefore unclear whether the study results are generalizable to physician assistants or nurse practitioners, who now are able to prescribe buprenorphine after meeting certain requirements.

Still, the study uncovered new information about the steps that prescribers take to mitigate diversion. “Addressing diversion is a complex clinical dilemma and contextual factors, including availability of services, may need to be explored in the future alongside provider practices addressing diversion,” the investigators wrote.

SOURCE: LA Lin et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 May 1. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.015.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Most prescribers of buprenorphine view diversion or misappropriation of the drug as a concern, and most assess their patients for diversion, according to Lewei (Allison) Lin, MD, and her associates.

In a survey of 1,174 buprenorphine prescribers conducted from July 2014 to January 2017, 79% of the prescribers reported assessing all their patients for diversion of the drug, and 79.1% reported conducting urine tests for the presence of buprenorphine. In addition, 85% of prescribers viewed diversion as a problem in their community, and 80.3% of prescribers were willing to terminate treatment because of diversion, reported Dr. Lin of the department of psychiatry at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and her associates in Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Diversion was defined as “unauthorized rerouting or misappropriation of prescribed buprenorphine to someone other than the person for whom it was intended.”

Dr. Lin and her associates found that prescribers were more likely to assess all of their patients for diversion if they viewed diversion as a problem in their community, had fewer years of experience, or were white. Urine testing was more likely if prescribers viewed diversion as a problem in their community, had more patients, had less experience, had a 100-patient waiver, or were nonpsychiatrists. Treatment termination was more likely for prescribers who had a greater percentages of patients with medication counts, viewed diversion as a problem in their community, or practiced in nonaddiction/nonpsychiatric specialties.

“Although we did not include detailed questions about termination, the high proportion of prescribers who would terminate patients for diversion is important to note,” wrote Dr. Lin, also a research investigator at the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, and her associates. Addiction medicine specialists and psychiatrists were less likely to terminate patients because of concerns about diversion – which suggests that additional training in addiction might make clinicians more comfortable managing patients with high-risk behaviors, the investigators said.

They cited several limitations. For example, the survey’s cross-sectional design makes causal inferences difficult. In addition, when the survey was conducted, physicians were the only buprenorphine prescribers. It is therefore unclear whether the study results are generalizable to physician assistants or nurse practitioners, who now are able to prescribe buprenorphine after meeting certain requirements.

Still, the study uncovered new information about the steps that prescribers take to mitigate diversion. “Addressing diversion is a complex clinical dilemma and contextual factors, including availability of services, may need to be explored in the future alongside provider practices addressing diversion,” the investigators wrote.

SOURCE: LA Lin et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 May 1. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.015.

 

Most prescribers of buprenorphine view diversion or misappropriation of the drug as a concern, and most assess their patients for diversion, according to Lewei (Allison) Lin, MD, and her associates.

In a survey of 1,174 buprenorphine prescribers conducted from July 2014 to January 2017, 79% of the prescribers reported assessing all their patients for diversion of the drug, and 79.1% reported conducting urine tests for the presence of buprenorphine. In addition, 85% of prescribers viewed diversion as a problem in their community, and 80.3% of prescribers were willing to terminate treatment because of diversion, reported Dr. Lin of the department of psychiatry at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and her associates in Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Diversion was defined as “unauthorized rerouting or misappropriation of prescribed buprenorphine to someone other than the person for whom it was intended.”

Dr. Lin and her associates found that prescribers were more likely to assess all of their patients for diversion if they viewed diversion as a problem in their community, had fewer years of experience, or were white. Urine testing was more likely if prescribers viewed diversion as a problem in their community, had more patients, had less experience, had a 100-patient waiver, or were nonpsychiatrists. Treatment termination was more likely for prescribers who had a greater percentages of patients with medication counts, viewed diversion as a problem in their community, or practiced in nonaddiction/nonpsychiatric specialties.

“Although we did not include detailed questions about termination, the high proportion of prescribers who would terminate patients for diversion is important to note,” wrote Dr. Lin, also a research investigator at the VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, and her associates. Addiction medicine specialists and psychiatrists were less likely to terminate patients because of concerns about diversion – which suggests that additional training in addiction might make clinicians more comfortable managing patients with high-risk behaviors, the investigators said.

They cited several limitations. For example, the survey’s cross-sectional design makes causal inferences difficult. In addition, when the survey was conducted, physicians were the only buprenorphine prescribers. It is therefore unclear whether the study results are generalizable to physician assistants or nurse practitioners, who now are able to prescribe buprenorphine after meeting certain requirements.

Still, the study uncovered new information about the steps that prescribers take to mitigate diversion. “Addressing diversion is a complex clinical dilemma and contextual factors, including availability of services, may need to be explored in the future alongside provider practices addressing diversion,” the investigators wrote.

SOURCE: LA Lin et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 May 1. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.015.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

CDC warns of hepatitis A outbreaks in injection drug users

Article Type
Changed

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevents has issued a Health Advisory regarding hepatitis A outbreaks within the United States among injection drug users.

From January 2017 to April 2018, more than 2,500 cases of hepatitis A infection associated with person-to-person transmission were reported to the CDC; of the 1,900 cases where risk factors are known, 68% were related to drug use, homelessness, or both. Various state responses caused a shortage in hepatitis A vaccine during this time, however, because of improvements in controlling outbreaks and an increased vaccine supply, the vaccine has become more available.


Usage of contaminated needles or other injection paraphernalia increase risk of hepatitis A infection, and transience, economic instability, limited health care access, distrust of public officials and public messages, and frequent lack of follow-up contact information in the population who regularly inject drugs make them difficult to reach with preventative services, such as vaccination, use of sterile injection equipment, and case management and contact tracing.

“These challenges make outbreaks among these groups difficult to control,” the CDC said in a statement.

The CDC recommends health departments ensure people who report drug use are vaccinated for hepatitis A, and consider programs to educate at-risk populations, as well as to provide vaccinations in places where at-risk populations may seek treatment. Health care providers should encourage patients who report drug use to be vaccinated for the disease.

For health care professionals, the CDC recommends considering a diagnosis of hepatitis A in any patient with jaundice and clinically compatible symptoms. The agency also recommends one dose of single-antigen hepatitis A vaccine or immune globulin within 2 weeks of exposure for unvaccinated patients who have been exposed to hepatitis A virus.

Find the full Health Advisory on the CDC website.
 

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevents has issued a Health Advisory regarding hepatitis A outbreaks within the United States among injection drug users.

From January 2017 to April 2018, more than 2,500 cases of hepatitis A infection associated with person-to-person transmission were reported to the CDC; of the 1,900 cases where risk factors are known, 68% were related to drug use, homelessness, or both. Various state responses caused a shortage in hepatitis A vaccine during this time, however, because of improvements in controlling outbreaks and an increased vaccine supply, the vaccine has become more available.


Usage of contaminated needles or other injection paraphernalia increase risk of hepatitis A infection, and transience, economic instability, limited health care access, distrust of public officials and public messages, and frequent lack of follow-up contact information in the population who regularly inject drugs make them difficult to reach with preventative services, such as vaccination, use of sterile injection equipment, and case management and contact tracing.

“These challenges make outbreaks among these groups difficult to control,” the CDC said in a statement.

The CDC recommends health departments ensure people who report drug use are vaccinated for hepatitis A, and consider programs to educate at-risk populations, as well as to provide vaccinations in places where at-risk populations may seek treatment. Health care providers should encourage patients who report drug use to be vaccinated for the disease.

For health care professionals, the CDC recommends considering a diagnosis of hepatitis A in any patient with jaundice and clinically compatible symptoms. The agency also recommends one dose of single-antigen hepatitis A vaccine or immune globulin within 2 weeks of exposure for unvaccinated patients who have been exposed to hepatitis A virus.

Find the full Health Advisory on the CDC website.
 

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevents has issued a Health Advisory regarding hepatitis A outbreaks within the United States among injection drug users.

From January 2017 to April 2018, more than 2,500 cases of hepatitis A infection associated with person-to-person transmission were reported to the CDC; of the 1,900 cases where risk factors are known, 68% were related to drug use, homelessness, or both. Various state responses caused a shortage in hepatitis A vaccine during this time, however, because of improvements in controlling outbreaks and an increased vaccine supply, the vaccine has become more available.


Usage of contaminated needles or other injection paraphernalia increase risk of hepatitis A infection, and transience, economic instability, limited health care access, distrust of public officials and public messages, and frequent lack of follow-up contact information in the population who regularly inject drugs make them difficult to reach with preventative services, such as vaccination, use of sterile injection equipment, and case management and contact tracing.

“These challenges make outbreaks among these groups difficult to control,” the CDC said in a statement.

The CDC recommends health departments ensure people who report drug use are vaccinated for hepatitis A, and consider programs to educate at-risk populations, as well as to provide vaccinations in places where at-risk populations may seek treatment. Health care providers should encourage patients who report drug use to be vaccinated for the disease.

For health care professionals, the CDC recommends considering a diagnosis of hepatitis A in any patient with jaundice and clinically compatible symptoms. The agency also recommends one dose of single-antigen hepatitis A vaccine or immune globulin within 2 weeks of exposure for unvaccinated patients who have been exposed to hepatitis A virus.

Find the full Health Advisory on the CDC website.
 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

FDA approves Prolia for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Article Type
Changed

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Prolia (denosumab) for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in adults at high risk of fracture, the drug’s manufacturer Amgen announced May 21.

FDA approval was based on 12-month primary analysis results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Patients who received a 60-mg dose of Prolia subcutaneously every 6 months had greater lumbar spine bone mineral density at 1 year than did those who received a 5-mg dose of risedronate daily in all study subpopulations. These results were maintained after researchers controlled for gender, race, geographic region, and menopausal status, as well as baseline age, lumbar spine bone mineral density T score, and glucocorticoid dose within each subpopulation.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
Prolia is currently approved to treat postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk, to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis at high fracture risk, and to increase bone mass in women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer and in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer.



The most common adverse events associated with Prolia during the phase 3 study were back pain, hypertension, bronchitis, and headache, which are in line with previously reported safety data.

“Patients on long-term systemic glucocorticoid medications can experience a rapid reduction in bone mineral density within a few months of beginning treatment. With this approval, patients who receive treatment with glucocorticoids now have a new option to help improve their bone mineral density,” lead study author Kenneth F. Saag, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, said in Amgen’s news release.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Prolia (denosumab) for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in adults at high risk of fracture, the drug’s manufacturer Amgen announced May 21.

FDA approval was based on 12-month primary analysis results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Patients who received a 60-mg dose of Prolia subcutaneously every 6 months had greater lumbar spine bone mineral density at 1 year than did those who received a 5-mg dose of risedronate daily in all study subpopulations. These results were maintained after researchers controlled for gender, race, geographic region, and menopausal status, as well as baseline age, lumbar spine bone mineral density T score, and glucocorticoid dose within each subpopulation.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
Prolia is currently approved to treat postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk, to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis at high fracture risk, and to increase bone mass in women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer and in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer.



The most common adverse events associated with Prolia during the phase 3 study were back pain, hypertension, bronchitis, and headache, which are in line with previously reported safety data.

“Patients on long-term systemic glucocorticoid medications can experience a rapid reduction in bone mineral density within a few months of beginning treatment. With this approval, patients who receive treatment with glucocorticoids now have a new option to help improve their bone mineral density,” lead study author Kenneth F. Saag, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, said in Amgen’s news release.

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Prolia (denosumab) for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in adults at high risk of fracture, the drug’s manufacturer Amgen announced May 21.

FDA approval was based on 12-month primary analysis results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Patients who received a 60-mg dose of Prolia subcutaneously every 6 months had greater lumbar spine bone mineral density at 1 year than did those who received a 5-mg dose of risedronate daily in all study subpopulations. These results were maintained after researchers controlled for gender, race, geographic region, and menopausal status, as well as baseline age, lumbar spine bone mineral density T score, and glucocorticoid dose within each subpopulation.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
Prolia is currently approved to treat postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk, to increase bone mass in men with osteoporosis at high fracture risk, and to increase bone mass in women receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer and in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer.



The most common adverse events associated with Prolia during the phase 3 study were back pain, hypertension, bronchitis, and headache, which are in line with previously reported safety data.

“Patients on long-term systemic glucocorticoid medications can experience a rapid reduction in bone mineral density within a few months of beginning treatment. With this approval, patients who receive treatment with glucocorticoids now have a new option to help improve their bone mineral density,” lead study author Kenneth F. Saag, MD, professor of medicine at the University of Alabama, Birmingham, said in Amgen’s news release.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

FDA approves Aimovig for migraine prevention

Article Type
Changed

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Aimovig (erenumab-aooe), delivered once a month via injection, for the prevention of migraines in adults.

Aimovig is the first FDA-approved treatment developed to prevent migraines by blocking the calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
Approval for the drug was based on results from three clinical trials. In the first, which included 955 patients with episodic migraine, patients treated with Aimovig over a 6-month period had, on average, 1-2 fewer migraine days per month than those who received placebo. In the second, which included 577 patients with episodic migraine, those treated with Aimovig over a 3-month period had, on average, 1 fewer migraine day per month versus those who received placebo.

The final clinical trial included 667 chronic migraine patients, and over a 3-month period, those treated with Aimovig had, on average, 2.5 fewer migraine days per month, compared with those who received placebo.

The most commonly reported adverse events were injection-site reactions and constipation.

“Aimovig provides patients with a novel option for reducing the number of days with migraine. We need new treatments for this painful and often debilitating condition,” Eric Bastings, MD, deputy director of the division of neurology products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in the press release.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Aimovig (erenumab-aooe), delivered once a month via injection, for the prevention of migraines in adults.

Aimovig is the first FDA-approved treatment developed to prevent migraines by blocking the calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
Approval for the drug was based on results from three clinical trials. In the first, which included 955 patients with episodic migraine, patients treated with Aimovig over a 6-month period had, on average, 1-2 fewer migraine days per month than those who received placebo. In the second, which included 577 patients with episodic migraine, those treated with Aimovig over a 3-month period had, on average, 1 fewer migraine day per month versus those who received placebo.

The final clinical trial included 667 chronic migraine patients, and over a 3-month period, those treated with Aimovig had, on average, 2.5 fewer migraine days per month, compared with those who received placebo.

The most commonly reported adverse events were injection-site reactions and constipation.

“Aimovig provides patients with a novel option for reducing the number of days with migraine. We need new treatments for this painful and often debilitating condition,” Eric Bastings, MD, deputy director of the division of neurology products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in the press release.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved Aimovig (erenumab-aooe), delivered once a month via injection, for the prevention of migraines in adults.

Aimovig is the first FDA-approved treatment developed to prevent migraines by blocking the calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor.

Wikimedia Commons/FitzColinGerald/Creative Commons License
Approval for the drug was based on results from three clinical trials. In the first, which included 955 patients with episodic migraine, patients treated with Aimovig over a 6-month period had, on average, 1-2 fewer migraine days per month than those who received placebo. In the second, which included 577 patients with episodic migraine, those treated with Aimovig over a 3-month period had, on average, 1 fewer migraine day per month versus those who received placebo.

The final clinical trial included 667 chronic migraine patients, and over a 3-month period, those treated with Aimovig had, on average, 2.5 fewer migraine days per month, compared with those who received placebo.

The most commonly reported adverse events were injection-site reactions and constipation.

“Aimovig provides patients with a novel option for reducing the number of days with migraine. We need new treatments for this painful and often debilitating condition,” Eric Bastings, MD, deputy director of the division of neurology products in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in the press release.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Certolizumab pegol shows promise for nr-axSpA treatment

Article Type
Changed

 

Certolizumab pegol was effective at treating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, the first drug to show positive results with the disease, according to topline data from a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial.

After 52 weeks, 47.2% of adult nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients within the C-AXSPAND trial who received certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) achieved at least a 2-point improvement on their Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, compared with 7.0% of nr-axSpA patients who received a placebo. In addition, patients who received certolizumab pegol also met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria of 40% response after 12 weeks.



“People living with nr-axSpA frequently face delayed or incorrect diagnosis, and currently, in the U.S., there are no FDA-approved options to treat this condition. The C-AXSPAND study results provide important insights into the potential of Cimzia as an effective and durable treatment option for these patients,” Atul Deodhar, MD, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, and a lead investigator of the study, said in an announcement from certolizumab’s manufacturer, UCB.

Certolizumab pegol is currently indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe RA, active psoriatic arthritis, and active ankylosing spondylitis, as well as for the reduction of Crohn’s disease symptoms. The most common adverse events in RA, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, hypertension, nasopharyngitis, back pain, pyrexia, pharyngitis, and rash.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Certolizumab pegol was effective at treating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, the first drug to show positive results with the disease, according to topline data from a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial.

After 52 weeks, 47.2% of adult nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients within the C-AXSPAND trial who received certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) achieved at least a 2-point improvement on their Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, compared with 7.0% of nr-axSpA patients who received a placebo. In addition, patients who received certolizumab pegol also met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria of 40% response after 12 weeks.



“People living with nr-axSpA frequently face delayed or incorrect diagnosis, and currently, in the U.S., there are no FDA-approved options to treat this condition. The C-AXSPAND study results provide important insights into the potential of Cimzia as an effective and durable treatment option for these patients,” Atul Deodhar, MD, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, and a lead investigator of the study, said in an announcement from certolizumab’s manufacturer, UCB.

Certolizumab pegol is currently indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe RA, active psoriatic arthritis, and active ankylosing spondylitis, as well as for the reduction of Crohn’s disease symptoms. The most common adverse events in RA, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, hypertension, nasopharyngitis, back pain, pyrexia, pharyngitis, and rash.

 

Certolizumab pegol was effective at treating nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis, the first drug to show positive results with the disease, according to topline data from a phase 3, placebo-controlled trial.

After 52 weeks, 47.2% of adult nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients within the C-AXSPAND trial who received certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) achieved at least a 2-point improvement on their Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, compared with 7.0% of nr-axSpA patients who received a placebo. In addition, patients who received certolizumab pegol also met the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria of 40% response after 12 weeks.



“People living with nr-axSpA frequently face delayed or incorrect diagnosis, and currently, in the U.S., there are no FDA-approved options to treat this condition. The C-AXSPAND study results provide important insights into the potential of Cimzia as an effective and durable treatment option for these patients,” Atul Deodhar, MD, professor of medicine at Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, and a lead investigator of the study, said in an announcement from certolizumab’s manufacturer, UCB.

Certolizumab pegol is currently indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe RA, active psoriatic arthritis, and active ankylosing spondylitis, as well as for the reduction of Crohn’s disease symptoms. The most common adverse events in RA, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis are upper respiratory tract infection, headache, hypertension, nasopharyngitis, back pain, pyrexia, pharyngitis, and rash.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Parents smoke less tobacco, more cannabis at home

Article Type
Changed

 

Children are increasingly less likely to be exposed to secondhand cigarette smoke in the home, but cannabis seems to be picking up some of the slack, according to Renee D. Goodwin, PhD, and her associates.

Using a study population of 169,259 adults with data available from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the researchers found that from 2002 to 2015, the prevalence of parents with children in the home who were also current smokers dropped from 27.6% to 20.2%. By contrast, the rate of cannabis usage increased from 4.9% to 6.8% over the same time period. Overall, the rate of children living in a home with secondhand smoke fell from 29.7% to 23.5%.

Jozef Sedmak/thinkstockphotos.com
In addition, the number of parents who smoked both cannabis and cigarettes increased from 11.0% in 2002 to 17.4% in 2015. Cannabis usage was nearly four times more likely in cigarette smokers than in non–cigarette smokers (odds ratio, 3.88), as was daily cannabis usage (OR, 3.70). Dual usage was significantly more likely in younger parents, with 20.4% of cigarette-smoking parents aged 18-25 years also using cannabis, compared with parents aged more than 50 years, who used cannabis at a rate of 7.0%.

“Public health efforts that have shown success in decreasing exposure to STS [secondhand tobacco smoke] in the home may be complicated by increased use of other smoked products, such as cannabis. Parents may benefit from education about protecting children from marijuana products, paraphernalia, waste, and smoke,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Goodwin RD et al. Pediatrics. 2018 May 14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3506.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

Children are increasingly less likely to be exposed to secondhand cigarette smoke in the home, but cannabis seems to be picking up some of the slack, according to Renee D. Goodwin, PhD, and her associates.

Using a study population of 169,259 adults with data available from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the researchers found that from 2002 to 2015, the prevalence of parents with children in the home who were also current smokers dropped from 27.6% to 20.2%. By contrast, the rate of cannabis usage increased from 4.9% to 6.8% over the same time period. Overall, the rate of children living in a home with secondhand smoke fell from 29.7% to 23.5%.

Jozef Sedmak/thinkstockphotos.com
In addition, the number of parents who smoked both cannabis and cigarettes increased from 11.0% in 2002 to 17.4% in 2015. Cannabis usage was nearly four times more likely in cigarette smokers than in non–cigarette smokers (odds ratio, 3.88), as was daily cannabis usage (OR, 3.70). Dual usage was significantly more likely in younger parents, with 20.4% of cigarette-smoking parents aged 18-25 years also using cannabis, compared with parents aged more than 50 years, who used cannabis at a rate of 7.0%.

“Public health efforts that have shown success in decreasing exposure to STS [secondhand tobacco smoke] in the home may be complicated by increased use of other smoked products, such as cannabis. Parents may benefit from education about protecting children from marijuana products, paraphernalia, waste, and smoke,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Goodwin RD et al. Pediatrics. 2018 May 14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3506.

 

Children are increasingly less likely to be exposed to secondhand cigarette smoke in the home, but cannabis seems to be picking up some of the slack, according to Renee D. Goodwin, PhD, and her associates.

Using a study population of 169,259 adults with data available from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, the researchers found that from 2002 to 2015, the prevalence of parents with children in the home who were also current smokers dropped from 27.6% to 20.2%. By contrast, the rate of cannabis usage increased from 4.9% to 6.8% over the same time period. Overall, the rate of children living in a home with secondhand smoke fell from 29.7% to 23.5%.

Jozef Sedmak/thinkstockphotos.com
In addition, the number of parents who smoked both cannabis and cigarettes increased from 11.0% in 2002 to 17.4% in 2015. Cannabis usage was nearly four times more likely in cigarette smokers than in non–cigarette smokers (odds ratio, 3.88), as was daily cannabis usage (OR, 3.70). Dual usage was significantly more likely in younger parents, with 20.4% of cigarette-smoking parents aged 18-25 years also using cannabis, compared with parents aged more than 50 years, who used cannabis at a rate of 7.0%.

“Public health efforts that have shown success in decreasing exposure to STS [secondhand tobacco smoke] in the home may be complicated by increased use of other smoked products, such as cannabis. Parents may benefit from education about protecting children from marijuana products, paraphernalia, waste, and smoke,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Goodwin RD et al. Pediatrics. 2018 May 14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3506.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRICS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

FDA approves dabrafenib/trametinib for BRAF-positive anaplastic thyroid cancer

Article Type
Changed

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved dabrafenib (Tafinlar) and trametinib (Mekinist), delivered in combination, for the treatment of BRAF V600E–positive anaplastic thyroid cancer.

FDA approval was based on results from an open-label clinical trial of patients with various rare, BRAF V600E–positive cancers. In a group of 23 patients, 57% experienced a partial response and 4% experienced a full response. In the response group, nine patients had no significant tumor growth for a period of at least 6 months.

Dabrafenib and trametinib has been previously approved, alone and in combination, to treat BRAF V600E–positive metastatic melanoma, as well as combination therapy for BRAF V600E–positive, metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.

The most common side effects of dabrafenib/trametinib are fever, rash, chills, headache, joint pain, cough, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, dry skin, decreased appetite, edema, hemorrhage, high blood pressure, and difficulty breathing. Both drugs can cause damage to developing fetuses, and women should be advised to use proper contraception.

“This approval demonstrates that targeting the same molecular pathway in diverse diseases is an effective way to expedite the development of treatments that may help more patients,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, said in the press release.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

Publications
Topics
Sections

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved dabrafenib (Tafinlar) and trametinib (Mekinist), delivered in combination, for the treatment of BRAF V600E–positive anaplastic thyroid cancer.

FDA approval was based on results from an open-label clinical trial of patients with various rare, BRAF V600E–positive cancers. In a group of 23 patients, 57% experienced a partial response and 4% experienced a full response. In the response group, nine patients had no significant tumor growth for a period of at least 6 months.

Dabrafenib and trametinib has been previously approved, alone and in combination, to treat BRAF V600E–positive metastatic melanoma, as well as combination therapy for BRAF V600E–positive, metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.

The most common side effects of dabrafenib/trametinib are fever, rash, chills, headache, joint pain, cough, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, dry skin, decreased appetite, edema, hemorrhage, high blood pressure, and difficulty breathing. Both drugs can cause damage to developing fetuses, and women should be advised to use proper contraception.

“This approval demonstrates that targeting the same molecular pathway in diverse diseases is an effective way to expedite the development of treatments that may help more patients,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, said in the press release.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

 

The Food and Drug Administration has approved dabrafenib (Tafinlar) and trametinib (Mekinist), delivered in combination, for the treatment of BRAF V600E–positive anaplastic thyroid cancer.

FDA approval was based on results from an open-label clinical trial of patients with various rare, BRAF V600E–positive cancers. In a group of 23 patients, 57% experienced a partial response and 4% experienced a full response. In the response group, nine patients had no significant tumor growth for a period of at least 6 months.

Dabrafenib and trametinib has been previously approved, alone and in combination, to treat BRAF V600E–positive metastatic melanoma, as well as combination therapy for BRAF V600E–positive, metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.

The most common side effects of dabrafenib/trametinib are fever, rash, chills, headache, joint pain, cough, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, dry skin, decreased appetite, edema, hemorrhage, high blood pressure, and difficulty breathing. Both drugs can cause damage to developing fetuses, and women should be advised to use proper contraception.

“This approval demonstrates that targeting the same molecular pathway in diverse diseases is an effective way to expedite the development of treatments that may help more patients,” Richard Pazdur, MD, director of the FDA’s Oncology Center of Excellence, said in the press release.

Find the full press release on the FDA website.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica

Very few infants born to HCV-infected mothers receive testing

Article Type
Changed

Despite the increasing prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in pregnant women, infants exposed to the disease are screened at a very low rate, Catherine A. Chappell, MD, and her associates wrote in Pediatrics.

During 2006-2014, 87,924 women gave birth at the Magee-Womens Hospital at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, of whom 1,043 had HCV. Over this time, the HCV prevalence rate increased 60%, from 1,026 cases per 100,000 women to 1,637 cases per 100,000 women. Women with HCV were more likely to be white, have Medicaid, have opiate use disorder, have other substance use disorders, and be under the age of 30 years.

Jarun011/Thinkstock
Of the 1,026 infants born to HCV-infected women for whom data was available, only 323 received well child care, and only 96 infants in this subgroup received HCV testing.

Infants born to HCV-infected women are significantly more likely to be preterm and of low birth weight.

An additional 32 infants who did not receive well child care did receive HCV testing. A total of nine infants, seven in the well child group and two in the non-well child group, tested positive for HCV.

“Of the infants tested with conclusive results, the HCV transmission rate was 8.4%, with 7.2% having chronic HCV infection,” which is in line with previous reports, according to the researchers.

“Because of the poor rates of pediatric HCV screening described, future researchers should focus on interventions to increase screening in infants who are at risk for perinatal HCV acquisition by including technology to improve the transfer of maternal HCV status to the pediatric record and increase pediatric provider awareness regarding HCV screening guidelines,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Chappell CA et al. Pediatrics. 2018 May 2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3273.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Despite the increasing prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in pregnant women, infants exposed to the disease are screened at a very low rate, Catherine A. Chappell, MD, and her associates wrote in Pediatrics.

During 2006-2014, 87,924 women gave birth at the Magee-Womens Hospital at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, of whom 1,043 had HCV. Over this time, the HCV prevalence rate increased 60%, from 1,026 cases per 100,000 women to 1,637 cases per 100,000 women. Women with HCV were more likely to be white, have Medicaid, have opiate use disorder, have other substance use disorders, and be under the age of 30 years.

Jarun011/Thinkstock
Of the 1,026 infants born to HCV-infected women for whom data was available, only 323 received well child care, and only 96 infants in this subgroup received HCV testing.

Infants born to HCV-infected women are significantly more likely to be preterm and of low birth weight.

An additional 32 infants who did not receive well child care did receive HCV testing. A total of nine infants, seven in the well child group and two in the non-well child group, tested positive for HCV.

“Of the infants tested with conclusive results, the HCV transmission rate was 8.4%, with 7.2% having chronic HCV infection,” which is in line with previous reports, according to the researchers.

“Because of the poor rates of pediatric HCV screening described, future researchers should focus on interventions to increase screening in infants who are at risk for perinatal HCV acquisition by including technology to improve the transfer of maternal HCV status to the pediatric record and increase pediatric provider awareness regarding HCV screening guidelines,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Chappell CA et al. Pediatrics. 2018 May 2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3273.

Despite the increasing prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in pregnant women, infants exposed to the disease are screened at a very low rate, Catherine A. Chappell, MD, and her associates wrote in Pediatrics.

During 2006-2014, 87,924 women gave birth at the Magee-Womens Hospital at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, of whom 1,043 had HCV. Over this time, the HCV prevalence rate increased 60%, from 1,026 cases per 100,000 women to 1,637 cases per 100,000 women. Women with HCV were more likely to be white, have Medicaid, have opiate use disorder, have other substance use disorders, and be under the age of 30 years.

Jarun011/Thinkstock
Of the 1,026 infants born to HCV-infected women for whom data was available, only 323 received well child care, and only 96 infants in this subgroup received HCV testing.

Infants born to HCV-infected women are significantly more likely to be preterm and of low birth weight.

An additional 32 infants who did not receive well child care did receive HCV testing. A total of nine infants, seven in the well child group and two in the non-well child group, tested positive for HCV.

“Of the infants tested with conclusive results, the HCV transmission rate was 8.4%, with 7.2% having chronic HCV infection,” which is in line with previous reports, according to the researchers.

“Because of the poor rates of pediatric HCV screening described, future researchers should focus on interventions to increase screening in infants who are at risk for perinatal HCV acquisition by including technology to improve the transfer of maternal HCV status to the pediatric record and increase pediatric provider awareness regarding HCV screening guidelines,” the investigators concluded.

SOURCE: Chappell CA et al. Pediatrics. 2018 May 2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3273.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Click for Credit Status
Ready
Sections
Article Source

FROM PEDIATRICS

Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica