User login
VIDEO: What really goes into getting new technologies paid for?
BOSTON – The real challenge for a new technology is not the good idea. It comes after FDA approval when a company must figure out how to get its device or procedure paid for, said Dr. Steven Schwaitzberg, professor and chief of the department of surgery at the University of Buffalo, speaking at the AGA Tech Summit, sponsored by the AGA Center for GI Innovation and Technology. Physicians want to provide cutting-edge tools to their patients, but they need to be reimbursed, and getting payers, like hospitals or government payers, to pay for the new procedure or device is the challenge. The AGA center facilitates this process by running observational research device registries to collect the data that show patient need, document value, and provide proof of efficacy.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – The real challenge for a new technology is not the good idea. It comes after FDA approval when a company must figure out how to get its device or procedure paid for, said Dr. Steven Schwaitzberg, professor and chief of the department of surgery at the University of Buffalo, speaking at the AGA Tech Summit, sponsored by the AGA Center for GI Innovation and Technology. Physicians want to provide cutting-edge tools to their patients, but they need to be reimbursed, and getting payers, like hospitals or government payers, to pay for the new procedure or device is the challenge. The AGA center facilitates this process by running observational research device registries to collect the data that show patient need, document value, and provide proof of efficacy.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – The real challenge for a new technology is not the good idea. It comes after FDA approval when a company must figure out how to get its device or procedure paid for, said Dr. Steven Schwaitzberg, professor and chief of the department of surgery at the University of Buffalo, speaking at the AGA Tech Summit, sponsored by the AGA Center for GI Innovation and Technology. Physicians want to provide cutting-edge tools to their patients, but they need to be reimbursed, and getting payers, like hospitals or government payers, to pay for the new procedure or device is the challenge. The AGA center facilitates this process by running observational research device registries to collect the data that show patient need, document value, and provide proof of efficacy.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
2016 AGA TECH SUMMIT
VIDEO: Dr. Tim Wang’s AGA Institute presidency will focus on innovation
BOSTON – Innovation, incoming AGA Institute President Timothy Wang explained at the AGA Tech Summit, is how AGA members will improve patient care and move the specialty forward. The AGA supports innovation through the work of the Center for GI Innovation and Technology, which sponsored the 2016 AGA Tech Summit, and by providing grants to young researchers through the AGA Research Foundation, such as the AGA–Boston Scientific and AGA–Covidien innovation awards, as well as many others.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Innovation, incoming AGA Institute President Timothy Wang explained at the AGA Tech Summit, is how AGA members will improve patient care and move the specialty forward. The AGA supports innovation through the work of the Center for GI Innovation and Technology, which sponsored the 2016 AGA Tech Summit, and by providing grants to young researchers through the AGA Research Foundation, such as the AGA–Boston Scientific and AGA–Covidien innovation awards, as well as many others.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
BOSTON – Innovation, incoming AGA Institute President Timothy Wang explained at the AGA Tech Summit, is how AGA members will improve patient care and move the specialty forward. The AGA supports innovation through the work of the Center for GI Innovation and Technology, which sponsored the 2016 AGA Tech Summit, and by providing grants to young researchers through the AGA Research Foundation, such as the AGA–Boston Scientific and AGA–Covidien innovation awards, as well as many others.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
AT THE AGA 2016 TECH SUMMIT
VIDEO: Determining your practice’s fair market value in a quality-based world
AUSTIN, TEX. – The shift from fee-for-service to value-based health care raises important questions about determining a physician practice’s fair market value, according to financial analyst Albert “Chip” D. Hutzler.
How will the new systems impact valuation? What about commercial reasonableness of arrangements? In a video interview at an American Health Lawyers Association meeting, Mr. Hutzler of HealthCare Appraisers, Delray, Fla., discussed the intersection of fair market value and value-based care, and he offered guidance on how to prepare for the changes.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
On Twitter @legal_med
AUSTIN, TEX. – The shift from fee-for-service to value-based health care raises important questions about determining a physician practice’s fair market value, according to financial analyst Albert “Chip” D. Hutzler.
How will the new systems impact valuation? What about commercial reasonableness of arrangements? In a video interview at an American Health Lawyers Association meeting, Mr. Hutzler of HealthCare Appraisers, Delray, Fla., discussed the intersection of fair market value and value-based care, and he offered guidance on how to prepare for the changes.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
On Twitter @legal_med
AUSTIN, TEX. – The shift from fee-for-service to value-based health care raises important questions about determining a physician practice’s fair market value, according to financial analyst Albert “Chip” D. Hutzler.
How will the new systems impact valuation? What about commercial reasonableness of arrangements? In a video interview at an American Health Lawyers Association meeting, Mr. Hutzler of HealthCare Appraisers, Delray, Fla., discussed the intersection of fair market value and value-based care, and he offered guidance on how to prepare for the changes.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
On Twitter @legal_med
AT THE PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS LAW INSTITUTE
VIDEO: Trastuzumab plus lapatinib erases selected breast cancers
AMSTERDAM – An unexpectedly dramatic benefit from combining trastuzumab and lapatinib when briefly treating women scheduled for breast cancer surgery has researchers focused on the best follow-up study to this promising but preliminary finding from 66 patients.
Among 66 patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive breast cancer and scheduled for surgery, an average 11 days of treatment with a combination of trastuzumab (Herceptin) and lapatinib (Tykerb) during the period before surgery resulted in a pathologic complete response (pCR) in seven patients (11%) and 11 patients (17%) with minimal residual disease (MRD), Dr. Nigel Bundred reported at the European Breast Cancer Conference.
These patients had breast cancer tumors at baseline with a median diameter of 2 cm that with treatment for not quite 2 weeks resulted in either complete tumor disappearance or shrinkage to less than 5 mm in diameter in 18 (27%) of the patients on dual therapy, said Dr. Bundred, a professor of surgical oncology at the University Hospital of South Manchester (England).
“No cancer has ever disappeared that fast. It was flabbergasting,” Dr. Bundred said in an interview. “We need to confirm the results, and get larger numbers of patients.”
“This was a really surprising finding,” said Judith M. Bliss, professor and director of the Clinical Trials & Statistics unit of the Institute of Cancer Research in London and a co-investigator. “We knew that trastuzumab and lapatinib are effective treatments, but we had not expected to see such a dramatic effect on the structure and size of the tumor in such a short period of time,” Prof. Bliss said in a video interview.
The finding came as part of the Effect of Perioperative Anti-HER2 Therapy on Overall Survival–Biologic Phase (EPHOS-B) trial, designed to assess changes in a marker of cell proliferation (Ki67) and in a marker of cell apoptosis in relation to treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both when administered during the 10-12 days from the time patients entered the study until their scheduled surgery.
During the first phase of EPHOS-B, when 130 patients received trastuzumab monotherapy, lapatinib monotherapy, or neither, one of the 57 patients on trastuzumab (2%) had a pathologic complete response and one patient (2%) had minimal residual disease. No patients on lapatinib alone or in the control arm with no anti-HER2 drug had this sort of response.
During the second phase, 127 patients received trastuzumab alone, trastuzumab plus lapatinib in combination, or controls who received no anti-HER2 treatment. The substantial number of complete or partial responders in the 66 patients who received combined treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib contrasted with one minimal residual disease among 32 patients (3%) who received trastuzumab alone and no responders among the 29 controls.
Patients receiving trastuzumab, alone or in the combined regimen, received a standard intravenous loading dosage of 6 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 after entry into the protocol, followed by a third dose after surgery on days 15-19; those also receiving lapatinib received 1 g/day orally for 28 days starting on entry.
“A quarter of the patients seem exquisitely sensitive to the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib,” said Dr. David Cameron, another collaborator on the EPHOS-B study. “It’s pretty unusual to treat for 10-12 days and have 10% of the tumors disappear.”
Follow-up studies will be needed to determine whether patients with a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease can forgo some or all of the chemotherapy that would usually follow surgery and still have good long-term disease-free survival. “We will focus on optimizing the short-term effect, and then modulate subsequent treatments,” said Dr. Cameron, professor and clinical director of oncology at the University of Edinburgh.
“We think these are patients who don’t need chemotherapy and are particularly sensitive to anti-HER2 drugs,” but so far that hasn’t been proven, cautioned Ms. Bliss.
The striking efficacy of trastuzumab combined with lapatinib in these 66 patients contrasts with the previously reported results from the ALTTO (Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization) study, which failed to show an advantage in disease-free survival with trastuzumab plus lapatinib, compared with either of these two agents used individually during 1 year of adjuvant treatment in more than 8,000 randomized patients (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1797), But the EPHOS-B results did agree with results from the much smaller NeoALTTO study, which showed in a randomized, multicenter, phase III study with 455 patients a significant incremental increase in pathologic complete response rate in patients on combined trastuzumab plus lapatinib, compared with patients on either drug alone (Lancet. 2012;379 [9816]:633-40).
Another promising finding from EPHOS-B was that among the 64 patients who had their left ventricular ejection fraction assessed prior to the second phase, none of 32 patients on the combined regimen showed signs of cardiotoxicity with a reduced ejection fraction following treatment, Dr. Bundred reported.
Until now, not much was known about the beneficial mechanisms of anti-HER2 drugs, he noted. The results from EPHOS-B “tell us that combined treatment does more than just shut down cell replication. It might be that trastuzumab induces an immune response.” The former tumor beds of patients with pathologic complete response as well as regions with minimal residual disease showed large numbers of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, a sign of a robust immune response.
Trastuzumab and lapatinib work by different mechanisms, Dr. Bundred stressed. “The only way you can combine drugs is by understanding their mechanisms. We’re still looking for the mechanisms of the anti-HER2 drugs.”
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
The significant proportion of patients treated with trastuzumab plus lapatinib for about 11 days who developed a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease was largely unexpected.
The finding raises questions: Can we identify patients after 11 days of treatment who are good responders to this combined treatment and will have an excellent relapse-free survival without ongoing combination anti-HER2 treatment or anti-HER2 escalation, and who will be eligible for chemotherapy de-escalation similar to the regimen tested by Tolaney and her associates (N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan;372:134-41)?
|
| Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News Dr. Hervé Bonnefoi |
We clearly need more data on the impact of the combined anti-HER2 regimen on the rate of long-term, relapse-free survival, and data from many more patients treated with a combined anti-HER2 regimen. The EPHOS-B results seem to contradict the results of the ALTTO study (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1797), but they confirm results of the NeoALTTO study, a randomized, multicenter, phase III study with 455 patients (Lancet. 2012 Jan;379[9816]:633-40).
The EPHOS-B researchers modeled their study after the presurgical treatment studies run using hormonal therapies. The results from studies of anti-HER2 treatments during this presurgical time window have been much harder to interpret.
Dr. Hervé Bonnefoi is a professor of medical oncology at Bordeaux University (France). He reported having no financial disclosures. He made these comments as the designated discussant for the EPHOS-B study.
The significant proportion of patients treated with trastuzumab plus lapatinib for about 11 days who developed a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease was largely unexpected.
The finding raises questions: Can we identify patients after 11 days of treatment who are good responders to this combined treatment and will have an excellent relapse-free survival without ongoing combination anti-HER2 treatment or anti-HER2 escalation, and who will be eligible for chemotherapy de-escalation similar to the regimen tested by Tolaney and her associates (N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan;372:134-41)?
|
| Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News Dr. Hervé Bonnefoi |
We clearly need more data on the impact of the combined anti-HER2 regimen on the rate of long-term, relapse-free survival, and data from many more patients treated with a combined anti-HER2 regimen. The EPHOS-B results seem to contradict the results of the ALTTO study (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1797), but they confirm results of the NeoALTTO study, a randomized, multicenter, phase III study with 455 patients (Lancet. 2012 Jan;379[9816]:633-40).
The EPHOS-B researchers modeled their study after the presurgical treatment studies run using hormonal therapies. The results from studies of anti-HER2 treatments during this presurgical time window have been much harder to interpret.
Dr. Hervé Bonnefoi is a professor of medical oncology at Bordeaux University (France). He reported having no financial disclosures. He made these comments as the designated discussant for the EPHOS-B study.
The significant proportion of patients treated with trastuzumab plus lapatinib for about 11 days who developed a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease was largely unexpected.
The finding raises questions: Can we identify patients after 11 days of treatment who are good responders to this combined treatment and will have an excellent relapse-free survival without ongoing combination anti-HER2 treatment or anti-HER2 escalation, and who will be eligible for chemotherapy de-escalation similar to the regimen tested by Tolaney and her associates (N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan;372:134-41)?
|
| Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News Dr. Hervé Bonnefoi |
We clearly need more data on the impact of the combined anti-HER2 regimen on the rate of long-term, relapse-free survival, and data from many more patients treated with a combined anti-HER2 regimen. The EPHOS-B results seem to contradict the results of the ALTTO study (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1797), but they confirm results of the NeoALTTO study, a randomized, multicenter, phase III study with 455 patients (Lancet. 2012 Jan;379[9816]:633-40).
The EPHOS-B researchers modeled their study after the presurgical treatment studies run using hormonal therapies. The results from studies of anti-HER2 treatments during this presurgical time window have been much harder to interpret.
Dr. Hervé Bonnefoi is a professor of medical oncology at Bordeaux University (France). He reported having no financial disclosures. He made these comments as the designated discussant for the EPHOS-B study.
AMSTERDAM – An unexpectedly dramatic benefit from combining trastuzumab and lapatinib when briefly treating women scheduled for breast cancer surgery has researchers focused on the best follow-up study to this promising but preliminary finding from 66 patients.
Among 66 patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive breast cancer and scheduled for surgery, an average 11 days of treatment with a combination of trastuzumab (Herceptin) and lapatinib (Tykerb) during the period before surgery resulted in a pathologic complete response (pCR) in seven patients (11%) and 11 patients (17%) with minimal residual disease (MRD), Dr. Nigel Bundred reported at the European Breast Cancer Conference.
These patients had breast cancer tumors at baseline with a median diameter of 2 cm that with treatment for not quite 2 weeks resulted in either complete tumor disappearance or shrinkage to less than 5 mm in diameter in 18 (27%) of the patients on dual therapy, said Dr. Bundred, a professor of surgical oncology at the University Hospital of South Manchester (England).
“No cancer has ever disappeared that fast. It was flabbergasting,” Dr. Bundred said in an interview. “We need to confirm the results, and get larger numbers of patients.”
“This was a really surprising finding,” said Judith M. Bliss, professor and director of the Clinical Trials & Statistics unit of the Institute of Cancer Research in London and a co-investigator. “We knew that trastuzumab and lapatinib are effective treatments, but we had not expected to see such a dramatic effect on the structure and size of the tumor in such a short period of time,” Prof. Bliss said in a video interview.
The finding came as part of the Effect of Perioperative Anti-HER2 Therapy on Overall Survival–Biologic Phase (EPHOS-B) trial, designed to assess changes in a marker of cell proliferation (Ki67) and in a marker of cell apoptosis in relation to treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both when administered during the 10-12 days from the time patients entered the study until their scheduled surgery.
During the first phase of EPHOS-B, when 130 patients received trastuzumab monotherapy, lapatinib monotherapy, or neither, one of the 57 patients on trastuzumab (2%) had a pathologic complete response and one patient (2%) had minimal residual disease. No patients on lapatinib alone or in the control arm with no anti-HER2 drug had this sort of response.
During the second phase, 127 patients received trastuzumab alone, trastuzumab plus lapatinib in combination, or controls who received no anti-HER2 treatment. The substantial number of complete or partial responders in the 66 patients who received combined treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib contrasted with one minimal residual disease among 32 patients (3%) who received trastuzumab alone and no responders among the 29 controls.
Patients receiving trastuzumab, alone or in the combined regimen, received a standard intravenous loading dosage of 6 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 after entry into the protocol, followed by a third dose after surgery on days 15-19; those also receiving lapatinib received 1 g/day orally for 28 days starting on entry.
“A quarter of the patients seem exquisitely sensitive to the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib,” said Dr. David Cameron, another collaborator on the EPHOS-B study. “It’s pretty unusual to treat for 10-12 days and have 10% of the tumors disappear.”
Follow-up studies will be needed to determine whether patients with a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease can forgo some or all of the chemotherapy that would usually follow surgery and still have good long-term disease-free survival. “We will focus on optimizing the short-term effect, and then modulate subsequent treatments,” said Dr. Cameron, professor and clinical director of oncology at the University of Edinburgh.
“We think these are patients who don’t need chemotherapy and are particularly sensitive to anti-HER2 drugs,” but so far that hasn’t been proven, cautioned Ms. Bliss.
The striking efficacy of trastuzumab combined with lapatinib in these 66 patients contrasts with the previously reported results from the ALTTO (Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization) study, which failed to show an advantage in disease-free survival with trastuzumab plus lapatinib, compared with either of these two agents used individually during 1 year of adjuvant treatment in more than 8,000 randomized patients (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1797), But the EPHOS-B results did agree with results from the much smaller NeoALTTO study, which showed in a randomized, multicenter, phase III study with 455 patients a significant incremental increase in pathologic complete response rate in patients on combined trastuzumab plus lapatinib, compared with patients on either drug alone (Lancet. 2012;379 [9816]:633-40).
Another promising finding from EPHOS-B was that among the 64 patients who had their left ventricular ejection fraction assessed prior to the second phase, none of 32 patients on the combined regimen showed signs of cardiotoxicity with a reduced ejection fraction following treatment, Dr. Bundred reported.
Until now, not much was known about the beneficial mechanisms of anti-HER2 drugs, he noted. The results from EPHOS-B “tell us that combined treatment does more than just shut down cell replication. It might be that trastuzumab induces an immune response.” The former tumor beds of patients with pathologic complete response as well as regions with minimal residual disease showed large numbers of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, a sign of a robust immune response.
Trastuzumab and lapatinib work by different mechanisms, Dr. Bundred stressed. “The only way you can combine drugs is by understanding their mechanisms. We’re still looking for the mechanisms of the anti-HER2 drugs.”
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AMSTERDAM – An unexpectedly dramatic benefit from combining trastuzumab and lapatinib when briefly treating women scheduled for breast cancer surgery has researchers focused on the best follow-up study to this promising but preliminary finding from 66 patients.
Among 66 patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive breast cancer and scheduled for surgery, an average 11 days of treatment with a combination of trastuzumab (Herceptin) and lapatinib (Tykerb) during the period before surgery resulted in a pathologic complete response (pCR) in seven patients (11%) and 11 patients (17%) with minimal residual disease (MRD), Dr. Nigel Bundred reported at the European Breast Cancer Conference.
These patients had breast cancer tumors at baseline with a median diameter of 2 cm that with treatment for not quite 2 weeks resulted in either complete tumor disappearance or shrinkage to less than 5 mm in diameter in 18 (27%) of the patients on dual therapy, said Dr. Bundred, a professor of surgical oncology at the University Hospital of South Manchester (England).
“No cancer has ever disappeared that fast. It was flabbergasting,” Dr. Bundred said in an interview. “We need to confirm the results, and get larger numbers of patients.”
“This was a really surprising finding,” said Judith M. Bliss, professor and director of the Clinical Trials & Statistics unit of the Institute of Cancer Research in London and a co-investigator. “We knew that trastuzumab and lapatinib are effective treatments, but we had not expected to see such a dramatic effect on the structure and size of the tumor in such a short period of time,” Prof. Bliss said in a video interview.
The finding came as part of the Effect of Perioperative Anti-HER2 Therapy on Overall Survival–Biologic Phase (EPHOS-B) trial, designed to assess changes in a marker of cell proliferation (Ki67) and in a marker of cell apoptosis in relation to treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both when administered during the 10-12 days from the time patients entered the study until their scheduled surgery.
During the first phase of EPHOS-B, when 130 patients received trastuzumab monotherapy, lapatinib monotherapy, or neither, one of the 57 patients on trastuzumab (2%) had a pathologic complete response and one patient (2%) had minimal residual disease. No patients on lapatinib alone or in the control arm with no anti-HER2 drug had this sort of response.
During the second phase, 127 patients received trastuzumab alone, trastuzumab plus lapatinib in combination, or controls who received no anti-HER2 treatment. The substantial number of complete or partial responders in the 66 patients who received combined treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib contrasted with one minimal residual disease among 32 patients (3%) who received trastuzumab alone and no responders among the 29 controls.
Patients receiving trastuzumab, alone or in the combined regimen, received a standard intravenous loading dosage of 6 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 after entry into the protocol, followed by a third dose after surgery on days 15-19; those also receiving lapatinib received 1 g/day orally for 28 days starting on entry.
“A quarter of the patients seem exquisitely sensitive to the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib,” said Dr. David Cameron, another collaborator on the EPHOS-B study. “It’s pretty unusual to treat for 10-12 days and have 10% of the tumors disappear.”
Follow-up studies will be needed to determine whether patients with a pathologic complete response or minimal residual disease can forgo some or all of the chemotherapy that would usually follow surgery and still have good long-term disease-free survival. “We will focus on optimizing the short-term effect, and then modulate subsequent treatments,” said Dr. Cameron, professor and clinical director of oncology at the University of Edinburgh.
“We think these are patients who don’t need chemotherapy and are particularly sensitive to anti-HER2 drugs,” but so far that hasn’t been proven, cautioned Ms. Bliss.
The striking efficacy of trastuzumab combined with lapatinib in these 66 patients contrasts with the previously reported results from the ALTTO (Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization) study, which failed to show an advantage in disease-free survival with trastuzumab plus lapatinib, compared with either of these two agents used individually during 1 year of adjuvant treatment in more than 8,000 randomized patients (J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.1797), But the EPHOS-B results did agree with results from the much smaller NeoALTTO study, which showed in a randomized, multicenter, phase III study with 455 patients a significant incremental increase in pathologic complete response rate in patients on combined trastuzumab plus lapatinib, compared with patients on either drug alone (Lancet. 2012;379 [9816]:633-40).
Another promising finding from EPHOS-B was that among the 64 patients who had their left ventricular ejection fraction assessed prior to the second phase, none of 32 patients on the combined regimen showed signs of cardiotoxicity with a reduced ejection fraction following treatment, Dr. Bundred reported.
Until now, not much was known about the beneficial mechanisms of anti-HER2 drugs, he noted. The results from EPHOS-B “tell us that combined treatment does more than just shut down cell replication. It might be that trastuzumab induces an immune response.” The former tumor beds of patients with pathologic complete response as well as regions with minimal residual disease showed large numbers of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, a sign of a robust immune response.
Trastuzumab and lapatinib work by different mechanisms, Dr. Bundred stressed. “The only way you can combine drugs is by understanding their mechanisms. We’re still looking for the mechanisms of the anti-HER2 drugs.”
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
On Twitter @mitchelzoler
AT EBCC10
Key clinical point: Combined treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib for 10-12 days led to complete HER2-positive breast cancer disappearance in seven of 66 patients.
Major finding: Pathologic complete responses occurred in seven of 66 patients on trastuzumab plus lapatinib, but none of 32 patients on trastuzumab alone or the 29 controls.
Data source: EPHOS-B, a multicenter, randomized, British study run in two phases with a total of 257 women with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Disclosures: GlaxoSmithKline, which at the time marketed lapatinib (Tykerb, now marketed by Novartis), made an educational grant to the Institute of Cancer Research in association with the EPHOS-B trial. Dr. Bundred served on an advisory board for Roche U.K. Ms. Bliss reported having no financial disclosures. Dr. Cameron has been a consultant to Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Roche, but received no additional compensation.
Treat insomnia in depressed, even suicidal, people
What’s Trending in OTC Antiaging Products: Report From the AAD Meeting
Patient interest in over-the-counter (OTC) antiaging products is increasing; however, the number of products to choose from can be overwhelming and patients may end up spending a lot of money on products that do not work. Dr. Anthony Rossi provides an overview of the latest trends in OTC antiaging products, including antioxidant-containing sunscreens, growth factors, and topical hyaluronic acid. Dr. Rossi notes that patients often call on dermatologists to offer product recommendations. Therefore, it is important for dermatologists to be familiar with product ingredients and counsel patients accordingly in order to maximize their effects on the skin.
Patient interest in over-the-counter (OTC) antiaging products is increasing; however, the number of products to choose from can be overwhelming and patients may end up spending a lot of money on products that do not work. Dr. Anthony Rossi provides an overview of the latest trends in OTC antiaging products, including antioxidant-containing sunscreens, growth factors, and topical hyaluronic acid. Dr. Rossi notes that patients often call on dermatologists to offer product recommendations. Therefore, it is important for dermatologists to be familiar with product ingredients and counsel patients accordingly in order to maximize their effects on the skin.
Patient interest in over-the-counter (OTC) antiaging products is increasing; however, the number of products to choose from can be overwhelming and patients may end up spending a lot of money on products that do not work. Dr. Anthony Rossi provides an overview of the latest trends in OTC antiaging products, including antioxidant-containing sunscreens, growth factors, and topical hyaluronic acid. Dr. Rossi notes that patients often call on dermatologists to offer product recommendations. Therefore, it is important for dermatologists to be familiar with product ingredients and counsel patients accordingly in order to maximize their effects on the skin.
Tools for Diagnosing Skin Cancer Earlier: Report From the AAD Meeting
At the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Dr. Orit Markowitz discussed noninvasive imaging tools that can help dermatologists diagnose skin cancers earlier. She provides highlights from this session, including the use of dermoscopy and optical coherence technology to detect features of early melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers as well as monitor skin cancer management. A lesion that is pink clinically but shows pigment dermoscopically should be biopsied, Dr. Markowtiz advises, as it may be an early amelanotic melanoma. She also notes that noninvasive imaging tools can be used to detect residual tumor cells in treated skin that otherwise looks clinically normal.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
At the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Dr. Orit Markowitz discussed noninvasive imaging tools that can help dermatologists diagnose skin cancers earlier. She provides highlights from this session, including the use of dermoscopy and optical coherence technology to detect features of early melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers as well as monitor skin cancer management. A lesion that is pink clinically but shows pigment dermoscopically should be biopsied, Dr. Markowtiz advises, as it may be an early amelanotic melanoma. She also notes that noninvasive imaging tools can be used to detect residual tumor cells in treated skin that otherwise looks clinically normal.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
At the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Dr. Orit Markowitz discussed noninvasive imaging tools that can help dermatologists diagnose skin cancers earlier. She provides highlights from this session, including the use of dermoscopy and optical coherence technology to detect features of early melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers as well as monitor skin cancer management. A lesion that is pink clinically but shows pigment dermoscopically should be biopsied, Dr. Markowtiz advises, as it may be an early amelanotic melanoma. She also notes that noninvasive imaging tools can be used to detect residual tumor cells in treated skin that otherwise looks clinically normal.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
VIDEO: Medication reconciliation can improve patient outcomes
SAN DIEGO – Prescription medications are a major contributor to unnecessary health care spending.
According to data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, retail spending on prescription drugs grew 12.2% to $297.7 billion in 2014, compared with the 2.4% growth in 2013. That’s one key reason why medication reconciliation should be performed at every inpatient and outpatient visit and prior to every hospital discharge, Dr. Aparna Kamath said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Hospital Medicine. “The focus should be on clear indications for each medication prescribed, substitution of generics when possible, and consideration of an individual patient’s insurance formulary and ability to meet out-of-pocket costs.”
A recent article in JAMA Internal Medicine discussed the practice of “deprescribing” in an effort to reduce the number of prescribed drugs (2015;175[5]:827-34). According to Dr. Kamath of the department of medicine at Duke University Health System, Durham, N.C., who was not involved with the article, deprescribing “means safely narrowing, discontinuing, or withdrawing medications for our patients. It has been shown that deprescribing might actually improve outpatient outcomes by making the medication list safer for our patients and hopefully also improve medication adherence by making them more affordable for our patients.”
The study authors proposed a five-step protocol for deprescribing:
• Ascertain all drugs the patient is currently taking and the reasons for each one.
• Consider overall risk of drug-induced harm in individual patients in determining the required intensity of deprescribing intervention.
• Assess each drug in regard to its current or future benefit potential, compared with current or future harm or burden potential.
• Prioritize drugs for discontinuation that have the lowest benefit-harm ratio and lowest likelihood of adverse withdrawal reactions or disease rebound syndromes.
• Implement a discontinuation regimen and monitor patients closely for improvement in outcomes or onset of adverse effects.
According to Dr. Kamath, other medication reconciliation strategies include referring patients to a social worker to inquire about drug assistance programs; following up with the patient’s primary care or prescribing physician; partnering with pharmacists; and educating patients about variance in prescription drug prices. “I think it’s important to inform the patients that these drugs are priced differently in different pharmacies,” she said. “According to Consumer Reports, we should ask the patient to shop around, maybe call the medication pharmacies in their local area to find out where they can find the drugs at a most affordable price. We can also advise our patients to ask for discounts or coupons, and check for monthly price changes,” Dr. Kamath said. She recommended the following websites, which allow patients to compare costs and/or inquire about discounts:
• https://www.rxpricequotes.com.
• https://www.blinkhealth.com.
Dr. Kamath reported having no financial disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
SAN DIEGO – Prescription medications are a major contributor to unnecessary health care spending.
According to data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, retail spending on prescription drugs grew 12.2% to $297.7 billion in 2014, compared with the 2.4% growth in 2013. That’s one key reason why medication reconciliation should be performed at every inpatient and outpatient visit and prior to every hospital discharge, Dr. Aparna Kamath said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Hospital Medicine. “The focus should be on clear indications for each medication prescribed, substitution of generics when possible, and consideration of an individual patient’s insurance formulary and ability to meet out-of-pocket costs.”
A recent article in JAMA Internal Medicine discussed the practice of “deprescribing” in an effort to reduce the number of prescribed drugs (2015;175[5]:827-34). According to Dr. Kamath of the department of medicine at Duke University Health System, Durham, N.C., who was not involved with the article, deprescribing “means safely narrowing, discontinuing, or withdrawing medications for our patients. It has been shown that deprescribing might actually improve outpatient outcomes by making the medication list safer for our patients and hopefully also improve medication adherence by making them more affordable for our patients.”
The study authors proposed a five-step protocol for deprescribing:
• Ascertain all drugs the patient is currently taking and the reasons for each one.
• Consider overall risk of drug-induced harm in individual patients in determining the required intensity of deprescribing intervention.
• Assess each drug in regard to its current or future benefit potential, compared with current or future harm or burden potential.
• Prioritize drugs for discontinuation that have the lowest benefit-harm ratio and lowest likelihood of adverse withdrawal reactions or disease rebound syndromes.
• Implement a discontinuation regimen and monitor patients closely for improvement in outcomes or onset of adverse effects.
According to Dr. Kamath, other medication reconciliation strategies include referring patients to a social worker to inquire about drug assistance programs; following up with the patient’s primary care or prescribing physician; partnering with pharmacists; and educating patients about variance in prescription drug prices. “I think it’s important to inform the patients that these drugs are priced differently in different pharmacies,” she said. “According to Consumer Reports, we should ask the patient to shop around, maybe call the medication pharmacies in their local area to find out where they can find the drugs at a most affordable price. We can also advise our patients to ask for discounts or coupons, and check for monthly price changes,” Dr. Kamath said. She recommended the following websites, which allow patients to compare costs and/or inquire about discounts:
• https://www.rxpricequotes.com.
• https://www.blinkhealth.com.
Dr. Kamath reported having no financial disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
SAN DIEGO – Prescription medications are a major contributor to unnecessary health care spending.
According to data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, retail spending on prescription drugs grew 12.2% to $297.7 billion in 2014, compared with the 2.4% growth in 2013. That’s one key reason why medication reconciliation should be performed at every inpatient and outpatient visit and prior to every hospital discharge, Dr. Aparna Kamath said in a video interview at the annual meeting of the Society of Hospital Medicine. “The focus should be on clear indications for each medication prescribed, substitution of generics when possible, and consideration of an individual patient’s insurance formulary and ability to meet out-of-pocket costs.”
A recent article in JAMA Internal Medicine discussed the practice of “deprescribing” in an effort to reduce the number of prescribed drugs (2015;175[5]:827-34). According to Dr. Kamath of the department of medicine at Duke University Health System, Durham, N.C., who was not involved with the article, deprescribing “means safely narrowing, discontinuing, or withdrawing medications for our patients. It has been shown that deprescribing might actually improve outpatient outcomes by making the medication list safer for our patients and hopefully also improve medication adherence by making them more affordable for our patients.”
The study authors proposed a five-step protocol for deprescribing:
• Ascertain all drugs the patient is currently taking and the reasons for each one.
• Consider overall risk of drug-induced harm in individual patients in determining the required intensity of deprescribing intervention.
• Assess each drug in regard to its current or future benefit potential, compared with current or future harm or burden potential.
• Prioritize drugs for discontinuation that have the lowest benefit-harm ratio and lowest likelihood of adverse withdrawal reactions or disease rebound syndromes.
• Implement a discontinuation regimen and monitor patients closely for improvement in outcomes or onset of adverse effects.
According to Dr. Kamath, other medication reconciliation strategies include referring patients to a social worker to inquire about drug assistance programs; following up with the patient’s primary care or prescribing physician; partnering with pharmacists; and educating patients about variance in prescription drug prices. “I think it’s important to inform the patients that these drugs are priced differently in different pharmacies,” she said. “According to Consumer Reports, we should ask the patient to shop around, maybe call the medication pharmacies in their local area to find out where they can find the drugs at a most affordable price. We can also advise our patients to ask for discounts or coupons, and check for monthly price changes,” Dr. Kamath said. She recommended the following websites, which allow patients to compare costs and/or inquire about discounts:
• https://www.rxpricequotes.com.
• https://www.blinkhealth.com.
Dr. Kamath reported having no financial disclosures.
The video associated with this article is no longer available on this site. Please view all of our videos on the MDedge YouTube channel
EXPERT ANALYSIS AT HOSPITAL MEDICINE 16
Small bowel surgery for the benign gynecologist

For more videos from the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, click here
Visit the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons online: sgsonline.org

For more videos from the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, click here
Visit the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons online: sgsonline.org

For more videos from the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, click here
Visit the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons online: sgsonline.org
This video is brought to you by
Atopic Dermatitis Treatments Moving Forward: Report From the AAD Meeting
Although psoriasis was once at the forefront of therapeutic advancements in dermatology, atopic dermatitis (AD) is now taking center stage with several new treatments in the pipeline. Dr. Emma Guttman-Yassky provides an overview of the future of AD treatment, which includes new topical and systemic agents that currently are moving forward in advanced clinical trials or are close to registration. She also discusses strategies for improving disease management in AD patients, noting that prevention and education of both patients and their caregivers are key to effective treatment.
Although psoriasis was once at the forefront of therapeutic advancements in dermatology, atopic dermatitis (AD) is now taking center stage with several new treatments in the pipeline. Dr. Emma Guttman-Yassky provides an overview of the future of AD treatment, which includes new topical and systemic agents that currently are moving forward in advanced clinical trials or are close to registration. She also discusses strategies for improving disease management in AD patients, noting that prevention and education of both patients and their caregivers are key to effective treatment.
Although psoriasis was once at the forefront of therapeutic advancements in dermatology, atopic dermatitis (AD) is now taking center stage with several new treatments in the pipeline. Dr. Emma Guttman-Yassky provides an overview of the future of AD treatment, which includes new topical and systemic agents that currently are moving forward in advanced clinical trials or are close to registration. She also discusses strategies for improving disease management in AD patients, noting that prevention and education of both patients and their caregivers are key to effective treatment.