User login
COMPLETE revascularization reduces death and recurrent MI risk
Revascularization of more than just the culprit lesion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctions could significantly reduce their risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, according to results of the COMPLETE trial, presented at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
The report, simultaneously published online in the New England Journal of Medicine, detailed the outcomes of COMPLETE (the Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies to Treat Multivessel Disease after Early PCI for STEMI), a study in 4,041 patients who had experienced an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), who had multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit lesion.
Participants were randomized either to complete revascularization of all angiographically significant nonculprit lesions, or to no further revascularization, and were followed for a median of 3 years.
Of the patients who underwent complete revascularization, 7.8% experienced either cardiovascular death or another myocardial infarction, compared with 10.5% of those who only had revascularization of the culprit lesion, representing a significant 26% reduction (P = .004) in the incidence of this composite coprimary outcome.
The decrease in events was driven by a significant 32% reduction in the incidence of new myocardial infarction – particularly non-STEMI, new STEMI, and myocardial infarction type 1 – in the complete revascularization group, with only a 7% reduction in the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes.
With the second coprimary outcome of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization, this was seen in 8.9% of patients in the complete revascularization group compared with 16.7% of patients with the culprit-lesion-only group; a significant 49% reduction in incidence (P less than .001).
The authors calculated that 37 complete revascularizations would need to be performed to prevent one incidence of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. To prevent cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization, the number needed to treat was 13.
The timing of complete revascularization did not appear to affect the benefits of the procedure, which were consistent among patients who underwent complete revascularization during their index hospitalization and in those who underwent the procedure after hospital discharge. Investigators had to specify before randomization whether the patient would undergo complete revascularization during the index hospitalization or after discharge but within 45 days.
The study also did not find any significant differences between the two groups in the risks of major bleeding, stroke, or stent thrombosis. However, the complete revascularization group did experience a nonsignificant 59% higher odds of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, which was attributed to the nonculprit lesion revascularization in seven patients in the complete revascularization group.
Dr. Shamir R. Mehta, of the Population Health Research Institute at McMaster University, Ontario, and coauthors noted that previous trials of complete-revascularization strategies in patients with STEMI were smaller and had included revascularization as part of a composite primary outcome.
“In the absence of a reduction in irreversible events such as cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction, the clinical relevance of performing early nonculprit-lesion PCI in all patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to prevent later PCI in a smaller number of those patients is debatable,” they wrote. “We have now found that routine nonculprit-lesion PCI with the goal of complete revascularization confers a reduction in the long-term risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction.”
No patients with cardiogenic shock were enrolled in the study, so the results could not be extrapolated to that patient group.
In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Lars Kober and Dr. Thomas Engstrøm, of the department of cardiology at Rigshospitalet at the University of Copenhagen, wrote that until now, there had been a lack of evidence that complete revascularization could reduce hard outcomes such as death and recurrent myocardial infarction (N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep. 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1910898).
However, they said, given the findings of this study, it might now be appropriate to recommend complete revascularization for patients such as those enrolled in the study.
“Better selection of high-risk patients may also refine the determination of who is most likely to benefit from complete revascularization,” they wrote.
COMPLETE was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, with additional support from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, and the Population Health Research Institute. Two authors declared support from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific during the conduct of the study, and eight declared personal fees, funding, and grants from the pharmaceutical industry outside the study. One author declared employment with Medtronic, unrelated to the submitted work.
Both editorial authors declared grants and personal fees, including from the study supporters.
SOURCE: Mehta S et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep. 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775.
Revascularization of more than just the culprit lesion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctions could significantly reduce their risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, according to results of the COMPLETE trial, presented at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
The report, simultaneously published online in the New England Journal of Medicine, detailed the outcomes of COMPLETE (the Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies to Treat Multivessel Disease after Early PCI for STEMI), a study in 4,041 patients who had experienced an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), who had multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit lesion.
Participants were randomized either to complete revascularization of all angiographically significant nonculprit lesions, or to no further revascularization, and were followed for a median of 3 years.
Of the patients who underwent complete revascularization, 7.8% experienced either cardiovascular death or another myocardial infarction, compared with 10.5% of those who only had revascularization of the culprit lesion, representing a significant 26% reduction (P = .004) in the incidence of this composite coprimary outcome.
The decrease in events was driven by a significant 32% reduction in the incidence of new myocardial infarction – particularly non-STEMI, new STEMI, and myocardial infarction type 1 – in the complete revascularization group, with only a 7% reduction in the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes.
With the second coprimary outcome of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization, this was seen in 8.9% of patients in the complete revascularization group compared with 16.7% of patients with the culprit-lesion-only group; a significant 49% reduction in incidence (P less than .001).
The authors calculated that 37 complete revascularizations would need to be performed to prevent one incidence of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. To prevent cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization, the number needed to treat was 13.
The timing of complete revascularization did not appear to affect the benefits of the procedure, which were consistent among patients who underwent complete revascularization during their index hospitalization and in those who underwent the procedure after hospital discharge. Investigators had to specify before randomization whether the patient would undergo complete revascularization during the index hospitalization or after discharge but within 45 days.
The study also did not find any significant differences between the two groups in the risks of major bleeding, stroke, or stent thrombosis. However, the complete revascularization group did experience a nonsignificant 59% higher odds of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, which was attributed to the nonculprit lesion revascularization in seven patients in the complete revascularization group.
Dr. Shamir R. Mehta, of the Population Health Research Institute at McMaster University, Ontario, and coauthors noted that previous trials of complete-revascularization strategies in patients with STEMI were smaller and had included revascularization as part of a composite primary outcome.
“In the absence of a reduction in irreversible events such as cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction, the clinical relevance of performing early nonculprit-lesion PCI in all patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to prevent later PCI in a smaller number of those patients is debatable,” they wrote. “We have now found that routine nonculprit-lesion PCI with the goal of complete revascularization confers a reduction in the long-term risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction.”
No patients with cardiogenic shock were enrolled in the study, so the results could not be extrapolated to that patient group.
In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Lars Kober and Dr. Thomas Engstrøm, of the department of cardiology at Rigshospitalet at the University of Copenhagen, wrote that until now, there had been a lack of evidence that complete revascularization could reduce hard outcomes such as death and recurrent myocardial infarction (N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep. 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1910898).
However, they said, given the findings of this study, it might now be appropriate to recommend complete revascularization for patients such as those enrolled in the study.
“Better selection of high-risk patients may also refine the determination of who is most likely to benefit from complete revascularization,” they wrote.
COMPLETE was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, with additional support from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, and the Population Health Research Institute. Two authors declared support from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific during the conduct of the study, and eight declared personal fees, funding, and grants from the pharmaceutical industry outside the study. One author declared employment with Medtronic, unrelated to the submitted work.
Both editorial authors declared grants and personal fees, including from the study supporters.
SOURCE: Mehta S et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep. 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775.
Revascularization of more than just the culprit lesion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctions could significantly reduce their risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, according to results of the COMPLETE trial, presented at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
The report, simultaneously published online in the New England Journal of Medicine, detailed the outcomes of COMPLETE (the Complete versus Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies to Treat Multivessel Disease after Early PCI for STEMI), a study in 4,041 patients who had experienced an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), who had multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and who had undergone successful percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit lesion.
Participants were randomized either to complete revascularization of all angiographically significant nonculprit lesions, or to no further revascularization, and were followed for a median of 3 years.
Of the patients who underwent complete revascularization, 7.8% experienced either cardiovascular death or another myocardial infarction, compared with 10.5% of those who only had revascularization of the culprit lesion, representing a significant 26% reduction (P = .004) in the incidence of this composite coprimary outcome.
The decrease in events was driven by a significant 32% reduction in the incidence of new myocardial infarction – particularly non-STEMI, new STEMI, and myocardial infarction type 1 – in the complete revascularization group, with only a 7% reduction in the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes.
With the second coprimary outcome of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization, this was seen in 8.9% of patients in the complete revascularization group compared with 16.7% of patients with the culprit-lesion-only group; a significant 49% reduction in incidence (P less than .001).
The authors calculated that 37 complete revascularizations would need to be performed to prevent one incidence of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. To prevent cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization, the number needed to treat was 13.
The timing of complete revascularization did not appear to affect the benefits of the procedure, which were consistent among patients who underwent complete revascularization during their index hospitalization and in those who underwent the procedure after hospital discharge. Investigators had to specify before randomization whether the patient would undergo complete revascularization during the index hospitalization or after discharge but within 45 days.
The study also did not find any significant differences between the two groups in the risks of major bleeding, stroke, or stent thrombosis. However, the complete revascularization group did experience a nonsignificant 59% higher odds of contrast-associated acute kidney injury, which was attributed to the nonculprit lesion revascularization in seven patients in the complete revascularization group.
Dr. Shamir R. Mehta, of the Population Health Research Institute at McMaster University, Ontario, and coauthors noted that previous trials of complete-revascularization strategies in patients with STEMI were smaller and had included revascularization as part of a composite primary outcome.
“In the absence of a reduction in irreversible events such as cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction, the clinical relevance of performing early nonculprit-lesion PCI in all patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to prevent later PCI in a smaller number of those patients is debatable,” they wrote. “We have now found that routine nonculprit-lesion PCI with the goal of complete revascularization confers a reduction in the long-term risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction.”
No patients with cardiogenic shock were enrolled in the study, so the results could not be extrapolated to that patient group.
In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Lars Kober and Dr. Thomas Engstrøm, of the department of cardiology at Rigshospitalet at the University of Copenhagen, wrote that until now, there had been a lack of evidence that complete revascularization could reduce hard outcomes such as death and recurrent myocardial infarction (N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep. 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1910898).
However, they said, given the findings of this study, it might now be appropriate to recommend complete revascularization for patients such as those enrolled in the study.
“Better selection of high-risk patients may also refine the determination of who is most likely to benefit from complete revascularization,” they wrote.
COMPLETE was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, with additional support from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, and the Population Health Research Institute. Two authors declared support from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific during the conduct of the study, and eight declared personal fees, funding, and grants from the pharmaceutical industry outside the study. One author declared employment with Medtronic, unrelated to the submitted work.
Both editorial authors declared grants and personal fees, including from the study supporters.
SOURCE: Mehta S et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep. 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775.
FROM THE ESC CONGRESS 2019
Key clinical point: Complete revascularization after STEMI reduces death and recurrent MI risk.
Major finding: Thirty-seven complete revascularizations would need to be performed to prevent one incidence of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction.
Study details: COMPLETE, a randomized controlled trial in 4,041 patients with STEMI.
Disclosures: The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, with additional support from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, and the Population Health Research Institute. Two authors declared support from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific during the conduct of the study, and eight declared personal fees, funding, and grants from the pharmaceutical industry outside the study. One author declared employment with Medtronic, unrelated to the submitted work.
Source: Mehta S et al. N Engl J Med. 2019 Sep 1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775.
PCSK9 inhibition cuts events in very-high-risk groups
Patients at very high risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes derive substantial benefit from proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition, according to results of two analyses from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial.
In one prespecified analysis, the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab was linked to improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), while in the other, researchers wrote that alirocumab showed a “large absolute benefit” in patients with polyvascular disease, which they defined as the presence of concomitant peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or both.
These reports on alirocumab outcomes in patients with prior CABG and polyvascular disease appear in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Prior CABG and polyvascular disease were both associated with markedly elevated risks of major adverse coronary events (MACE) and death, investigators wrote in the reports.
The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial included 18,924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and high atherogenic lipoproteins despite intensive statin treatment. The primary outcome was MACE, comprising a composite of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. During a median 2.8 years of follow-up, this outcome occurred in 9.5% of the overall population randomized to alirocumab and 11.1% of those on placebo, for a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 15% relative risk reduction.
Polyvascular disease
In the trial population, 1,405 patients had polyvascular disease in at least two beds, including a coronary artery, plus either peripheral artery or cerebrovascular, while 149 had polyvascular disease in all three beds. The remainder, including 17,370 patients, were classified as having monovascular disease.
The incidences of MACE for placebo-treated patients with monovascular disease, two-bed polyvascular disease, and three-bed polyvascular disease were 10.0%, 22.2%, and 39.7%, respectively. Alirocumab treatment resulted in an absolute risk reduction for MACE of 1.4%, 1.9%, and 13.0%, for those respective groups (P = .0006).
Similarly, the incidence of the secondary endpoint of death for placebo-treated patients was 3.5%, 10.0%, and 21.8%, and the ARR with alirocumab was 0.4%, 1.3%, and 16.2% (P = .002), according to their reported data.
These results suggest that patients with polyvascular disease are an “easily identifiable subgroup” of ACS patients with a high absolute risk of MACE and death, according to the investigators, led by J. Wouter Jukema, MD, PhD, of Leiden (the Netherlands) University Medical Center.
“The large absolute benefit of PCSK9 inhibition with alirocumab, when added to high-intensity statin therapy, is a potential benefit for this group of patients,” Dr. Jukema and coauthors wrote.
Prior CABG
Of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES patients, 1,025 had an index CABG after ACS, 1,003 had CABG before ACS, and the remaining 16,896 had no such procedure.
Hazard ratios for both MACE and death in all CABG categories were consistent with the overall results of ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, the investigators wrote. Specifically, alirocumab reduced MACE and death in the overall study, with HRs of 0.85 for both endpoints.
The ARRs in MACE with alirocumab were 1.3% for no CABG, 0.9% for index CABG, and 6.4% for prior CABG (P = .0007), while ARRs in death with the treatment were 0.4%, 0.5%, and 3.6% (P = .03) for those categories, respectively. In this analysis, the investigators calculated the number needed to treat to prevent one primary or secondary endpoint over the median 2.8 years of follow-up. The numbers needed to treat were 16 for prior CABG, 111 for index, and 77 for no prior CABG.
“Although the relative benefit of alirocumab versus placebo is consistent regardless of prior CABG status, those with prior CABG achieve substantially greater absolute risk reduction and consequently lower number needed to treat,” wrote the authors of the analysis, led by Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc, of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto.
Funding for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial and its subanalyses was provided by Sanofi and Regeneron. Authors of the analyses reported disclosures related to Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and others.
SOURCES: Goodman SG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.015; Jukema JW et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.013.
These two secondary analyses of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial are very important studies that reinforce the usefulness of PCSK9 inhibition in extremely high risk populations.
Although each study has limitations as acknowledged, it provides further evidence that should lead us to strongly consider the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with a previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or a history of polyvascular disease.
The studies confirm that aggressive lipid-lowering therapy will benefit patients in those high-risk subsets. The significant reductions in mortality associated with lowering LDL cholesterol using alirocumab can no longer be ignored.
Economic analyses would be interesting, as the substantial reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths attributed to alirocumab would likely impact health care costs and society at large.
However, it is concerning that patients with prior CABG and those with a high atherosclerosis burden in multiple arterial territories were seemingly less well treated than acute coronary syndrome patients.
An LDL cholesterol level of at least 100 mg/dL was seen in upward of 40% of the high-risk participants at randomization, while 87% had high BP, 40% had diabetes, and 16% were current smokers.
A reasonable first step in the approach to patient care is for physicians to be less complacent and apply, with enthusiasm, secondary prevention guidelines in post-CABG and polyvascular disease patients to strive to eliminate smoking and to enforce lifestyle modifications with known benefits in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Jacques Genest, MD, and Alexandre M. Bélanger, MD, of McGill University, Montreal, and Mandeep S. Sidhu, MD, of Albany (N.Y.) Medical College made these comments in an accompanying editorial ( J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.016 ). The authors reported disclosures related to Sanofi, Amgen, Pfizer, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, and others.
These two secondary analyses of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial are very important studies that reinforce the usefulness of PCSK9 inhibition in extremely high risk populations.
Although each study has limitations as acknowledged, it provides further evidence that should lead us to strongly consider the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with a previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or a history of polyvascular disease.
The studies confirm that aggressive lipid-lowering therapy will benefit patients in those high-risk subsets. The significant reductions in mortality associated with lowering LDL cholesterol using alirocumab can no longer be ignored.
Economic analyses would be interesting, as the substantial reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths attributed to alirocumab would likely impact health care costs and society at large.
However, it is concerning that patients with prior CABG and those with a high atherosclerosis burden in multiple arterial territories were seemingly less well treated than acute coronary syndrome patients.
An LDL cholesterol level of at least 100 mg/dL was seen in upward of 40% of the high-risk participants at randomization, while 87% had high BP, 40% had diabetes, and 16% were current smokers.
A reasonable first step in the approach to patient care is for physicians to be less complacent and apply, with enthusiasm, secondary prevention guidelines in post-CABG and polyvascular disease patients to strive to eliminate smoking and to enforce lifestyle modifications with known benefits in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Jacques Genest, MD, and Alexandre M. Bélanger, MD, of McGill University, Montreal, and Mandeep S. Sidhu, MD, of Albany (N.Y.) Medical College made these comments in an accompanying editorial ( J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.016 ). The authors reported disclosures related to Sanofi, Amgen, Pfizer, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, and others.
These two secondary analyses of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial are very important studies that reinforce the usefulness of PCSK9 inhibition in extremely high risk populations.
Although each study has limitations as acknowledged, it provides further evidence that should lead us to strongly consider the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in patients with a previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or a history of polyvascular disease.
The studies confirm that aggressive lipid-lowering therapy will benefit patients in those high-risk subsets. The significant reductions in mortality associated with lowering LDL cholesterol using alirocumab can no longer be ignored.
Economic analyses would be interesting, as the substantial reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths attributed to alirocumab would likely impact health care costs and society at large.
However, it is concerning that patients with prior CABG and those with a high atherosclerosis burden in multiple arterial territories were seemingly less well treated than acute coronary syndrome patients.
An LDL cholesterol level of at least 100 mg/dL was seen in upward of 40% of the high-risk participants at randomization, while 87% had high BP, 40% had diabetes, and 16% were current smokers.
A reasonable first step in the approach to patient care is for physicians to be less complacent and apply, with enthusiasm, secondary prevention guidelines in post-CABG and polyvascular disease patients to strive to eliminate smoking and to enforce lifestyle modifications with known benefits in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Jacques Genest, MD, and Alexandre M. Bélanger, MD, of McGill University, Montreal, and Mandeep S. Sidhu, MD, of Albany (N.Y.) Medical College made these comments in an accompanying editorial ( J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.016 ). The authors reported disclosures related to Sanofi, Amgen, Pfizer, Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, and others.
Patients at very high risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes derive substantial benefit from proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition, according to results of two analyses from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial.
In one prespecified analysis, the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab was linked to improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), while in the other, researchers wrote that alirocumab showed a “large absolute benefit” in patients with polyvascular disease, which they defined as the presence of concomitant peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or both.
These reports on alirocumab outcomes in patients with prior CABG and polyvascular disease appear in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Prior CABG and polyvascular disease were both associated with markedly elevated risks of major adverse coronary events (MACE) and death, investigators wrote in the reports.
The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial included 18,924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and high atherogenic lipoproteins despite intensive statin treatment. The primary outcome was MACE, comprising a composite of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. During a median 2.8 years of follow-up, this outcome occurred in 9.5% of the overall population randomized to alirocumab and 11.1% of those on placebo, for a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 15% relative risk reduction.
Polyvascular disease
In the trial population, 1,405 patients had polyvascular disease in at least two beds, including a coronary artery, plus either peripheral artery or cerebrovascular, while 149 had polyvascular disease in all three beds. The remainder, including 17,370 patients, were classified as having monovascular disease.
The incidences of MACE for placebo-treated patients with monovascular disease, two-bed polyvascular disease, and three-bed polyvascular disease were 10.0%, 22.2%, and 39.7%, respectively. Alirocumab treatment resulted in an absolute risk reduction for MACE of 1.4%, 1.9%, and 13.0%, for those respective groups (P = .0006).
Similarly, the incidence of the secondary endpoint of death for placebo-treated patients was 3.5%, 10.0%, and 21.8%, and the ARR with alirocumab was 0.4%, 1.3%, and 16.2% (P = .002), according to their reported data.
These results suggest that patients with polyvascular disease are an “easily identifiable subgroup” of ACS patients with a high absolute risk of MACE and death, according to the investigators, led by J. Wouter Jukema, MD, PhD, of Leiden (the Netherlands) University Medical Center.
“The large absolute benefit of PCSK9 inhibition with alirocumab, when added to high-intensity statin therapy, is a potential benefit for this group of patients,” Dr. Jukema and coauthors wrote.
Prior CABG
Of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES patients, 1,025 had an index CABG after ACS, 1,003 had CABG before ACS, and the remaining 16,896 had no such procedure.
Hazard ratios for both MACE and death in all CABG categories were consistent with the overall results of ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, the investigators wrote. Specifically, alirocumab reduced MACE and death in the overall study, with HRs of 0.85 for both endpoints.
The ARRs in MACE with alirocumab were 1.3% for no CABG, 0.9% for index CABG, and 6.4% for prior CABG (P = .0007), while ARRs in death with the treatment were 0.4%, 0.5%, and 3.6% (P = .03) for those categories, respectively. In this analysis, the investigators calculated the number needed to treat to prevent one primary or secondary endpoint over the median 2.8 years of follow-up. The numbers needed to treat were 16 for prior CABG, 111 for index, and 77 for no prior CABG.
“Although the relative benefit of alirocumab versus placebo is consistent regardless of prior CABG status, those with prior CABG achieve substantially greater absolute risk reduction and consequently lower number needed to treat,” wrote the authors of the analysis, led by Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc, of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto.
Funding for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial and its subanalyses was provided by Sanofi and Regeneron. Authors of the analyses reported disclosures related to Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and others.
SOURCES: Goodman SG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.015; Jukema JW et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.013.
Patients at very high risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes derive substantial benefit from proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition, according to results of two analyses from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial.
In one prespecified analysis, the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab was linked to improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), while in the other, researchers wrote that alirocumab showed a “large absolute benefit” in patients with polyvascular disease, which they defined as the presence of concomitant peripheral artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or both.
These reports on alirocumab outcomes in patients with prior CABG and polyvascular disease appear in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Prior CABG and polyvascular disease were both associated with markedly elevated risks of major adverse coronary events (MACE) and death, investigators wrote in the reports.
The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial included 18,924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and high atherogenic lipoproteins despite intensive statin treatment. The primary outcome was MACE, comprising a composite of coronary heart disease death, nonfatal MI, ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. During a median 2.8 years of follow-up, this outcome occurred in 9.5% of the overall population randomized to alirocumab and 11.1% of those on placebo, for a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 15% relative risk reduction.
Polyvascular disease
In the trial population, 1,405 patients had polyvascular disease in at least two beds, including a coronary artery, plus either peripheral artery or cerebrovascular, while 149 had polyvascular disease in all three beds. The remainder, including 17,370 patients, were classified as having monovascular disease.
The incidences of MACE for placebo-treated patients with monovascular disease, two-bed polyvascular disease, and three-bed polyvascular disease were 10.0%, 22.2%, and 39.7%, respectively. Alirocumab treatment resulted in an absolute risk reduction for MACE of 1.4%, 1.9%, and 13.0%, for those respective groups (P = .0006).
Similarly, the incidence of the secondary endpoint of death for placebo-treated patients was 3.5%, 10.0%, and 21.8%, and the ARR with alirocumab was 0.4%, 1.3%, and 16.2% (P = .002), according to their reported data.
These results suggest that patients with polyvascular disease are an “easily identifiable subgroup” of ACS patients with a high absolute risk of MACE and death, according to the investigators, led by J. Wouter Jukema, MD, PhD, of Leiden (the Netherlands) University Medical Center.
“The large absolute benefit of PCSK9 inhibition with alirocumab, when added to high-intensity statin therapy, is a potential benefit for this group of patients,” Dr. Jukema and coauthors wrote.
Prior CABG
Of the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES patients, 1,025 had an index CABG after ACS, 1,003 had CABG before ACS, and the remaining 16,896 had no such procedure.
Hazard ratios for both MACE and death in all CABG categories were consistent with the overall results of ODYSSEY OUTCOMES, the investigators wrote. Specifically, alirocumab reduced MACE and death in the overall study, with HRs of 0.85 for both endpoints.
The ARRs in MACE with alirocumab were 1.3% for no CABG, 0.9% for index CABG, and 6.4% for prior CABG (P = .0007), while ARRs in death with the treatment were 0.4%, 0.5%, and 3.6% (P = .03) for those categories, respectively. In this analysis, the investigators calculated the number needed to treat to prevent one primary or secondary endpoint over the median 2.8 years of follow-up. The numbers needed to treat were 16 for prior CABG, 111 for index, and 77 for no prior CABG.
“Although the relative benefit of alirocumab versus placebo is consistent regardless of prior CABG status, those with prior CABG achieve substantially greater absolute risk reduction and consequently lower number needed to treat,” wrote the authors of the analysis, led by Shaun G. Goodman, MD, MSc, of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto.
Funding for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial and its subanalyses was provided by Sanofi and Regeneron. Authors of the analyses reported disclosures related to Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and others.
SOURCES: Goodman SG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.015; Jukema JW et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.013.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Key clinical point: The PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab improved cardiovascular outcomes in very-high-risk populations, including patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting and those with polyvascular disease.
Major findings: In one analysis, the absolute risk reductions in major adverse coronary events with alirocumab were 1.3% for no coronary artery bypass grafting, 0.9% for index CABG, and 6.4% for prior CABG. In another analysis, alirocumab treatment resulted in an ARR for major adverse coronary events of 1.4%, 1.9%, and 13.0% for patients with monovascular disease, two-bed polyvascular disease, and three-bed polyvascular disease, respectively.
Study details: Prespecified analyses of patients with recent acute coronary syndrome and high atherogenic lipoproteins despite intensive statin treatment in the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial, which included 18,924 total participants.
Disclosures: Funding for the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial and its subanalyses was provided by Sanofi and Regeneron. Authors of the analyses reported disclosures related to Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and others.
Sources: Goodman SG et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.015; Jukema JW et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.013.
HCV coinfection adds to cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, as well as an accumulation of viral and bacterial infections, was independently associated with the risk of developing a cardiovascular event in HIV-infected patients, according to the results of a large retrospective analysis.
The study comprised 823 patients at a single institution during 1982-2018. The researchers assessed those patients who had at least two visits to the HIV clinic, data concerning herpes varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation, and bacterial infections. Data on HCV coinfection status (as determined by HCV antibodies and qualitative HCV-PCR) were also available, according to Miguel Genebat, MD, of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain, and colleagues.
During the observational period, 58 patients (7%) experienced a cardiovascular event at a median age of 47 years. Most of these patients (50, 86%) had effective HIV treatment, with their viral load being persistently undetectable.
In terms of standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, hypercholesterolemia was present in 31 patients (53%) and only 11 subjects (19%) had diabetes. This left 24 “low-risk” subjects, 5 of whom (21%) developed recurrent CVD and 8 of whom (33%) died after the development of cardiovascular disease.
The most frequent cardiovascular event was acute coronary syndrome (ACS), developed by 38 patients, with 14 (24%) of these individuals having recurrent CVD events. Among the 58 patients who experienced a cardiovascular event, 21 (36%) died, 17 from cardiovascular disease, 2 from cancer, and 2 each from acute bacterial infection and end-stage liver disease.
The researchers examined other variables potentially associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. They performed a multivariate analysis considering the added burden of infections and found that advanced age at HIV-1 diagnosis (OR, 1.07), a T-CD4 nadir of less than 200 cells/mcL (OR, 2.01), a diagnosis of HIV prior to combined antiretroviral therapy availability in 1996 (OR, 2.35), and cumulative infections greater than 2 (OR, 3.63), were all significantly and independently associated with the risk of developing a cardiovascular event.
They also found that HCV coinfection (OR, 2.84) on its own in simple multivariate analysis increased the risk of developing a CVD event in HIV-infected subjects. There was insufficient power to tease out the individual risk of other infections, such as herpes zoster virus and bacterial infections, hence the use of cumulative infections reported above.
The researchers concluded that potential strategies to minimize cardiovascular risk in these subjects could be treating HCV coinfection in all subjects independently of liver fibrosis stage, starting cART as soon as possible, and immunizing for those infections for which effective vaccine are available.
The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Genebat M. et al. Antiviral Res. 2019 Sep;169:104527.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, as well as an accumulation of viral and bacterial infections, was independently associated with the risk of developing a cardiovascular event in HIV-infected patients, according to the results of a large retrospective analysis.
The study comprised 823 patients at a single institution during 1982-2018. The researchers assessed those patients who had at least two visits to the HIV clinic, data concerning herpes varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation, and bacterial infections. Data on HCV coinfection status (as determined by HCV antibodies and qualitative HCV-PCR) were also available, according to Miguel Genebat, MD, of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain, and colleagues.
During the observational period, 58 patients (7%) experienced a cardiovascular event at a median age of 47 years. Most of these patients (50, 86%) had effective HIV treatment, with their viral load being persistently undetectable.
In terms of standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, hypercholesterolemia was present in 31 patients (53%) and only 11 subjects (19%) had diabetes. This left 24 “low-risk” subjects, 5 of whom (21%) developed recurrent CVD and 8 of whom (33%) died after the development of cardiovascular disease.
The most frequent cardiovascular event was acute coronary syndrome (ACS), developed by 38 patients, with 14 (24%) of these individuals having recurrent CVD events. Among the 58 patients who experienced a cardiovascular event, 21 (36%) died, 17 from cardiovascular disease, 2 from cancer, and 2 each from acute bacterial infection and end-stage liver disease.
The researchers examined other variables potentially associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. They performed a multivariate analysis considering the added burden of infections and found that advanced age at HIV-1 diagnosis (OR, 1.07), a T-CD4 nadir of less than 200 cells/mcL (OR, 2.01), a diagnosis of HIV prior to combined antiretroviral therapy availability in 1996 (OR, 2.35), and cumulative infections greater than 2 (OR, 3.63), were all significantly and independently associated with the risk of developing a cardiovascular event.
They also found that HCV coinfection (OR, 2.84) on its own in simple multivariate analysis increased the risk of developing a CVD event in HIV-infected subjects. There was insufficient power to tease out the individual risk of other infections, such as herpes zoster virus and bacterial infections, hence the use of cumulative infections reported above.
The researchers concluded that potential strategies to minimize cardiovascular risk in these subjects could be treating HCV coinfection in all subjects independently of liver fibrosis stage, starting cART as soon as possible, and immunizing for those infections for which effective vaccine are available.
The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Genebat M. et al. Antiviral Res. 2019 Sep;169:104527.
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection, as well as an accumulation of viral and bacterial infections, was independently associated with the risk of developing a cardiovascular event in HIV-infected patients, according to the results of a large retrospective analysis.
The study comprised 823 patients at a single institution during 1982-2018. The researchers assessed those patients who had at least two visits to the HIV clinic, data concerning herpes varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation, and bacterial infections. Data on HCV coinfection status (as determined by HCV antibodies and qualitative HCV-PCR) were also available, according to Miguel Genebat, MD, of Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain, and colleagues.
During the observational period, 58 patients (7%) experienced a cardiovascular event at a median age of 47 years. Most of these patients (50, 86%) had effective HIV treatment, with their viral load being persistently undetectable.
In terms of standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, hypercholesterolemia was present in 31 patients (53%) and only 11 subjects (19%) had diabetes. This left 24 “low-risk” subjects, 5 of whom (21%) developed recurrent CVD and 8 of whom (33%) died after the development of cardiovascular disease.
The most frequent cardiovascular event was acute coronary syndrome (ACS), developed by 38 patients, with 14 (24%) of these individuals having recurrent CVD events. Among the 58 patients who experienced a cardiovascular event, 21 (36%) died, 17 from cardiovascular disease, 2 from cancer, and 2 each from acute bacterial infection and end-stage liver disease.
The researchers examined other variables potentially associated with the development of cardiovascular disease. They performed a multivariate analysis considering the added burden of infections and found that advanced age at HIV-1 diagnosis (OR, 1.07), a T-CD4 nadir of less than 200 cells/mcL (OR, 2.01), a diagnosis of HIV prior to combined antiretroviral therapy availability in 1996 (OR, 2.35), and cumulative infections greater than 2 (OR, 3.63), were all significantly and independently associated with the risk of developing a cardiovascular event.
They also found that HCV coinfection (OR, 2.84) on its own in simple multivariate analysis increased the risk of developing a CVD event in HIV-infected subjects. There was insufficient power to tease out the individual risk of other infections, such as herpes zoster virus and bacterial infections, hence the use of cumulative infections reported above.
The researchers concluded that potential strategies to minimize cardiovascular risk in these subjects could be treating HCV coinfection in all subjects independently of liver fibrosis stage, starting cART as soon as possible, and immunizing for those infections for which effective vaccine are available.
The authors reported that they had no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Genebat M. et al. Antiviral Res. 2019 Sep;169:104527.
FROM ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
How thin should we go?
An 88-year-old man with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation presents with severe cerebral palsy and is diagnosed with a non–ST-elevation MI. He is found to have 90% left anterior descending artery occlusion and receives a drug-eluting stent. His current medications include warfarin, tiotropium, amlodipine, aspirin, and lisinopril. What anticoagulant therapy should he receive?
A) Clopidogrel, warfarin, and aspirin
B) Clopidogrel and aspirin
C) Clopidogrel and warfarin
D) Warfarin
E) Warfarin and aspirin
This issue comes up frequently with our patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation, then have a coronary event and have a stent placed. What is the best approach to anticoagulation? I think for this patient adding clopidogrel, continuing warfarin, and stopping aspirin would be the best of the options presented.
Elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. They also have a greater chance of accumulating cardiovascular disease (atrial fibrillation, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and valvular disease) that requires anticoagulation. Dewilde et al. studied the difference in bleeding risk in patients who were on oral anticoagulants who then underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention.1 Patients were assigned clopidogrel alone or clopidogrel plus aspirin in addition to their oral anticoagulant (warfarin). There was a significant increase in all-cause mortality in the patients who received clopidogrel plus aspirin (P = .027), and no significant difference in cardiac mortality between the two groups. There was a much higher risk of bleeding (44.4%) in the patients receiving triple therapy, compared with the double-therapy group (19.4%; P less than .0001).
In a large meta-analysis of over 7,000 patients by D’Ascenzo et al., there was no difference in thrombotic risk between double and triple therapy, and lower bleeding risk in patients who received double therapy.2
In a recently published article, Lopes et al. looked at the benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation.3 The study included 4,614 patients, all of whom received a P2Y12 inhibitor. In addition, they received either apixaban or warfarin, and either aspirin or placebo. The patients who received apixaban had a lower risk of bleeding than those receiving warfarin (P less than .001), and those receiving aspirin had a higher risk than those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.89; P less than .001). Patients using the combination of apixaban plus placebo had the lowest event rate per 100 years (16.8), followed by warfarin plus placebo (26.7), then apixaban plus aspirin (33.6), with warfarin plus aspirin having the highest event rate (49.1). The conclusion for the study was that regimens with apixaban without aspirin had less bleeding and hospitalizations without increased ischemic events, compared with regimens of warfarin with or without aspirin.
Pearl: Avoid using triple anticoagulant therapy by eliminating aspirin.
Dr. Paauw is professor of medicine in the division of general internal medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, and serves as third-year medical student clerkship director at the University of Washington. Contact Dr. Paauw at [email protected].
References
1. Dewilde WJ et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15.
2. D’Ascenzo F et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational results of use of clopidogrel, aspirin, and oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1185-93.
3. Lopes RD et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1509-24.
An 88-year-old man with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation presents with severe cerebral palsy and is diagnosed with a non–ST-elevation MI. He is found to have 90% left anterior descending artery occlusion and receives a drug-eluting stent. His current medications include warfarin, tiotropium, amlodipine, aspirin, and lisinopril. What anticoagulant therapy should he receive?
A) Clopidogrel, warfarin, and aspirin
B) Clopidogrel and aspirin
C) Clopidogrel and warfarin
D) Warfarin
E) Warfarin and aspirin
This issue comes up frequently with our patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation, then have a coronary event and have a stent placed. What is the best approach to anticoagulation? I think for this patient adding clopidogrel, continuing warfarin, and stopping aspirin would be the best of the options presented.
Elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. They also have a greater chance of accumulating cardiovascular disease (atrial fibrillation, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and valvular disease) that requires anticoagulation. Dewilde et al. studied the difference in bleeding risk in patients who were on oral anticoagulants who then underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention.1 Patients were assigned clopidogrel alone or clopidogrel plus aspirin in addition to their oral anticoagulant (warfarin). There was a significant increase in all-cause mortality in the patients who received clopidogrel plus aspirin (P = .027), and no significant difference in cardiac mortality between the two groups. There was a much higher risk of bleeding (44.4%) in the patients receiving triple therapy, compared with the double-therapy group (19.4%; P less than .0001).
In a large meta-analysis of over 7,000 patients by D’Ascenzo et al., there was no difference in thrombotic risk between double and triple therapy, and lower bleeding risk in patients who received double therapy.2
In a recently published article, Lopes et al. looked at the benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation.3 The study included 4,614 patients, all of whom received a P2Y12 inhibitor. In addition, they received either apixaban or warfarin, and either aspirin or placebo. The patients who received apixaban had a lower risk of bleeding than those receiving warfarin (P less than .001), and those receiving aspirin had a higher risk than those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.89; P less than .001). Patients using the combination of apixaban plus placebo had the lowest event rate per 100 years (16.8), followed by warfarin plus placebo (26.7), then apixaban plus aspirin (33.6), with warfarin plus aspirin having the highest event rate (49.1). The conclusion for the study was that regimens with apixaban without aspirin had less bleeding and hospitalizations without increased ischemic events, compared with regimens of warfarin with or without aspirin.
Pearl: Avoid using triple anticoagulant therapy by eliminating aspirin.
Dr. Paauw is professor of medicine in the division of general internal medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, and serves as third-year medical student clerkship director at the University of Washington. Contact Dr. Paauw at [email protected].
References
1. Dewilde WJ et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15.
2. D’Ascenzo F et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational results of use of clopidogrel, aspirin, and oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1185-93.
3. Lopes RD et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1509-24.
An 88-year-old man with hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation presents with severe cerebral palsy and is diagnosed with a non–ST-elevation MI. He is found to have 90% left anterior descending artery occlusion and receives a drug-eluting stent. His current medications include warfarin, tiotropium, amlodipine, aspirin, and lisinopril. What anticoagulant therapy should he receive?
A) Clopidogrel, warfarin, and aspirin
B) Clopidogrel and aspirin
C) Clopidogrel and warfarin
D) Warfarin
E) Warfarin and aspirin
This issue comes up frequently with our patients with atrial fibrillation who are on anticoagulation, then have a coronary event and have a stent placed. What is the best approach to anticoagulation? I think for this patient adding clopidogrel, continuing warfarin, and stopping aspirin would be the best of the options presented.
Elderly patients have a higher risk of bleeding. They also have a greater chance of accumulating cardiovascular disease (atrial fibrillation, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and valvular disease) that requires anticoagulation. Dewilde et al. studied the difference in bleeding risk in patients who were on oral anticoagulants who then underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention.1 Patients were assigned clopidogrel alone or clopidogrel plus aspirin in addition to their oral anticoagulant (warfarin). There was a significant increase in all-cause mortality in the patients who received clopidogrel plus aspirin (P = .027), and no significant difference in cardiac mortality between the two groups. There was a much higher risk of bleeding (44.4%) in the patients receiving triple therapy, compared with the double-therapy group (19.4%; P less than .0001).
In a large meta-analysis of over 7,000 patients by D’Ascenzo et al., there was no difference in thrombotic risk between double and triple therapy, and lower bleeding risk in patients who received double therapy.2
In a recently published article, Lopes et al. looked at the benefits and risks of antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation.3 The study included 4,614 patients, all of whom received a P2Y12 inhibitor. In addition, they received either apixaban or warfarin, and either aspirin or placebo. The patients who received apixaban had a lower risk of bleeding than those receiving warfarin (P less than .001), and those receiving aspirin had a higher risk than those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.89; P less than .001). Patients using the combination of apixaban plus placebo had the lowest event rate per 100 years (16.8), followed by warfarin plus placebo (26.7), then apixaban plus aspirin (33.6), with warfarin plus aspirin having the highest event rate (49.1). The conclusion for the study was that regimens with apixaban without aspirin had less bleeding and hospitalizations without increased ischemic events, compared with regimens of warfarin with or without aspirin.
Pearl: Avoid using triple anticoagulant therapy by eliminating aspirin.
Dr. Paauw is professor of medicine in the division of general internal medicine at the University of Washington, Seattle, and serves as third-year medical student clerkship director at the University of Washington. Contact Dr. Paauw at [email protected].
References
1. Dewilde WJ et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15.
2. D’Ascenzo F et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and adjusted observational results of use of clopidogrel, aspirin, and oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2015 May 1;115(9):1185-93.
3. Lopes RD et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1509-24.
Study: Cardiac biomarkers predicted CV events in CAP
in a recently conducted study.
These biomarkers were also used to predict late cardiovascular events at day 30 of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients who did not have a history of cardiovascular disease, according to Rosario Menéndez, MD, from the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe in Valencia, Spain, and colleagues.
“Some patients have still high levels of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers at 30 days, when they are usually referred to primary care without receiving any specific additional recommendations,” Dr. Menéndez and colleagues wrote in CHEST. “Our results suggest that a change in usual practice is needed to reduce current and further cardiovascular CAP complications.”
Dr. Menéndez and colleagues prospectively followed 730 patients for 1 year who were hospitalized for CAP, measuring the cardiac biomarkers proadrenomedullin (proADM), pro b-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP), proendothelin-1, and troponin T, and the inflammatory biomarkers interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). The researchers also collected data on age, gender, smoking status, and vaccination history, as well as whether patients had any cardiac, renal, pulmonary, neurological or diabetes-related comorbidities.
Overall, 95 patients experienced early cardiovascular events, 67 patients had long-term cardiovascular events, and 20 patients experienced both early and late events. In hospital, the mortality rate was 4.7%; the 30-day mortality rate was 5.3%, and the 1-year mortality rate was 9.9%.
With regard to biomarkers, patients who experienced both early and late cardiovascular events had significantly higher initial levels of proADM, proendothelin-1, troponin, proBNP, and IL-6. Patients who experienced later events had consistent levels of these biomarkers until day 30, except for a decrease at day 4 or day 5.
After adjustment for age, sepsis, previous cardiac disease, and a partial pressure of oxygen in the alveoli to fractional inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) of less than 250mm Hg, cardiac biomarkers proendothelin-1 (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.79), proADM (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.53-4.20), proBNP (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.59-4.49), and troponin T (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.62-4.49) significantly predicted early cardiovascular events, while proendothelin-1 (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.41-7.80), proADM (2.29; 95% CI, 1.01-5.19) and proBNP (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.01-5.56) significantly predicted late cardiovascular events. For day 30 results, when researchers added IL-6 levels to proendothelin-1, the odds ratio for late events increased to 3.53, and when they added IL-6 levels to proADM, the odds ratio increased to 2.80.
Researchers noted the limitations of the study included that they did not analyze cardiac biomarkers to predict specific cardiovascular events, did not identify the cause for mortality at 1 year in most patients, and did not include a control group.
This study was supported in part by funding from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica, and the Center for Biomedical Research Network in Respiratory Diseases. The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Menéndez R et al. Chest. 2019 Aug 2. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.040.
in a recently conducted study.
These biomarkers were also used to predict late cardiovascular events at day 30 of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients who did not have a history of cardiovascular disease, according to Rosario Menéndez, MD, from the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe in Valencia, Spain, and colleagues.
“Some patients have still high levels of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers at 30 days, when they are usually referred to primary care without receiving any specific additional recommendations,” Dr. Menéndez and colleagues wrote in CHEST. “Our results suggest that a change in usual practice is needed to reduce current and further cardiovascular CAP complications.”
Dr. Menéndez and colleagues prospectively followed 730 patients for 1 year who were hospitalized for CAP, measuring the cardiac biomarkers proadrenomedullin (proADM), pro b-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP), proendothelin-1, and troponin T, and the inflammatory biomarkers interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). The researchers also collected data on age, gender, smoking status, and vaccination history, as well as whether patients had any cardiac, renal, pulmonary, neurological or diabetes-related comorbidities.
Overall, 95 patients experienced early cardiovascular events, 67 patients had long-term cardiovascular events, and 20 patients experienced both early and late events. In hospital, the mortality rate was 4.7%; the 30-day mortality rate was 5.3%, and the 1-year mortality rate was 9.9%.
With regard to biomarkers, patients who experienced both early and late cardiovascular events had significantly higher initial levels of proADM, proendothelin-1, troponin, proBNP, and IL-6. Patients who experienced later events had consistent levels of these biomarkers until day 30, except for a decrease at day 4 or day 5.
After adjustment for age, sepsis, previous cardiac disease, and a partial pressure of oxygen in the alveoli to fractional inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) of less than 250mm Hg, cardiac biomarkers proendothelin-1 (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.79), proADM (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.53-4.20), proBNP (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.59-4.49), and troponin T (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.62-4.49) significantly predicted early cardiovascular events, while proendothelin-1 (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.41-7.80), proADM (2.29; 95% CI, 1.01-5.19) and proBNP (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.01-5.56) significantly predicted late cardiovascular events. For day 30 results, when researchers added IL-6 levels to proendothelin-1, the odds ratio for late events increased to 3.53, and when they added IL-6 levels to proADM, the odds ratio increased to 2.80.
Researchers noted the limitations of the study included that they did not analyze cardiac biomarkers to predict specific cardiovascular events, did not identify the cause for mortality at 1 year in most patients, and did not include a control group.
This study was supported in part by funding from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica, and the Center for Biomedical Research Network in Respiratory Diseases. The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Menéndez R et al. Chest. 2019 Aug 2. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.040.
in a recently conducted study.
These biomarkers were also used to predict late cardiovascular events at day 30 of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in patients who did not have a history of cardiovascular disease, according to Rosario Menéndez, MD, from the Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe in Valencia, Spain, and colleagues.
“Some patients have still high levels of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers at 30 days, when they are usually referred to primary care without receiving any specific additional recommendations,” Dr. Menéndez and colleagues wrote in CHEST. “Our results suggest that a change in usual practice is needed to reduce current and further cardiovascular CAP complications.”
Dr. Menéndez and colleagues prospectively followed 730 patients for 1 year who were hospitalized for CAP, measuring the cardiac biomarkers proadrenomedullin (proADM), pro b-type natriuretic peptide (proBNP), proendothelin-1, and troponin T, and the inflammatory biomarkers interleukin 6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and procalcitonin (PCT). The researchers also collected data on age, gender, smoking status, and vaccination history, as well as whether patients had any cardiac, renal, pulmonary, neurological or diabetes-related comorbidities.
Overall, 95 patients experienced early cardiovascular events, 67 patients had long-term cardiovascular events, and 20 patients experienced both early and late events. In hospital, the mortality rate was 4.7%; the 30-day mortality rate was 5.3%, and the 1-year mortality rate was 9.9%.
With regard to biomarkers, patients who experienced both early and late cardiovascular events had significantly higher initial levels of proADM, proendothelin-1, troponin, proBNP, and IL-6. Patients who experienced later events had consistent levels of these biomarkers until day 30, except for a decrease at day 4 or day 5.
After adjustment for age, sepsis, previous cardiac disease, and a partial pressure of oxygen in the alveoli to fractional inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2) of less than 250mm Hg, cardiac biomarkers proendothelin-1 (odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.79), proADM (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.53-4.20), proBNP (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.59-4.49), and troponin T (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.62-4.49) significantly predicted early cardiovascular events, while proendothelin-1 (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.41-7.80), proADM (2.29; 95% CI, 1.01-5.19) and proBNP (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.01-5.56) significantly predicted late cardiovascular events. For day 30 results, when researchers added IL-6 levels to proendothelin-1, the odds ratio for late events increased to 3.53, and when they added IL-6 levels to proADM, the odds ratio increased to 2.80.
Researchers noted the limitations of the study included that they did not analyze cardiac biomarkers to predict specific cardiovascular events, did not identify the cause for mortality at 1 year in most patients, and did not include a control group.
This study was supported in part by funding from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica, and the Center for Biomedical Research Network in Respiratory Diseases. The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Menéndez R et al. Chest. 2019 Aug 2. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.06.040.
FROM CHEST
Algorithm boosts MACE prediction in patients with chest pain
Adding electrocardiogram findings and clinical assessment to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements in patients presenting with chest pain could improve predictions of their risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events, particularly unstable angina, research suggests.
Investigators reported outcomes of a prospective study involving 3,123 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The findings are in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The aim of the researchers was to validate an extended algorithm that combined the European Society of Cardiology’s high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurement at presentation and after 1 hour (ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm) with clinical assessment and ECG findings to aid prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days.
The clinical assessment involved the treating ED physician’s use of a visual analog scale to assess the patient’s pretest probability for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with a score above 70% qualifying as high likelihood.
The researchers found that the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm alone triaged significantly more patients toward rule-out for MACE than did the extended algorithm (60% vs. 45%, P less than .001). This resulted in 487 patients being reclassified toward “observe” by the extended algorithm, and among this group the 30-day MACE rate was 1.1%.
However, the 30-day MACE rates were similar in the two groups – 0.6% among those ruled out by the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm alone and 0.4% in those ruled out by the extended algorithm – resulting in a similar negative predictive value.
“These estimates will help clinicians to appropriately manage patients triaged toward rule-out according to the ESC hs-cTnT 0/1 h algorithm, in whom either the [visual analog scale] for ACS or the ECG still suggests the presence of an ACS,” wrote Thomas Nestelberger, MD, of the Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (Switzerland) at the University of Basel, and coinvestigators.
The ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm also ruled in fewer patients than did the extended algorithm (16% vs. 26%, P less than .001), giving it a higher positive predictive value.
When the researchers added unstable angina to the major adverse cardiac event outcome, they found the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm had a lower negative predictive value and a higher negative likelihood ratio compared with the extended algorithm for patients ruled out, but a higher positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio for patients ruled in.
“Our findings corroborate and extend previous research regarding the development and validation of algorithms for the safe and effective rule-out and rule-in of MACE in patients with symptoms suggestive of AMI,” the authors wrote.
This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the European Union, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, the University Hospital Basel, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Biomerieux, BRAHMS, Roche, Nanosphere, Siemens, Ortho Diagnostics, and Singulex. Several authors reported grants and support from the pharmaceutical sector.
SOURCE: Nestelberger T et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.025.
In patients presenting at the emergency department with chest pain, it’s important not only to diagnose acute myocardial infarction, but also to predict short-term risk of cardiac events to help guide management. This thoughtful and comprehensive analysis is the largest study assessing the added value of clinical and ECG assessment to the prognostication by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithms in patients evaluated for chest pain. It reinforces the accuracy of hs-cTn at presentation and after 1 hour (ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h) algorithms to predict AMI and 30-day AMI-related events.
It is important to note that if unstable angina had been included as a major adverse cardiac event, the study would have found that the extended algorithm performs better than the hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm in the prediction of this endpoint.
Germán Cediel, MD, is from Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol in Spain, Alfredo Bardají, MD, is from the Joan XXIII University Hospital in Spain, and José A. Barrabés, MD, is from Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. The comments are adapted from an editorial (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.065). The authors declared support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund, and declared consultancies and educational activities with the pharmaceutical sector.
In patients presenting at the emergency department with chest pain, it’s important not only to diagnose acute myocardial infarction, but also to predict short-term risk of cardiac events to help guide management. This thoughtful and comprehensive analysis is the largest study assessing the added value of clinical and ECG assessment to the prognostication by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithms in patients evaluated for chest pain. It reinforces the accuracy of hs-cTn at presentation and after 1 hour (ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h) algorithms to predict AMI and 30-day AMI-related events.
It is important to note that if unstable angina had been included as a major adverse cardiac event, the study would have found that the extended algorithm performs better than the hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm in the prediction of this endpoint.
Germán Cediel, MD, is from Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol in Spain, Alfredo Bardají, MD, is from the Joan XXIII University Hospital in Spain, and José A. Barrabés, MD, is from Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. The comments are adapted from an editorial (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.065). The authors declared support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund, and declared consultancies and educational activities with the pharmaceutical sector.
In patients presenting at the emergency department with chest pain, it’s important not only to diagnose acute myocardial infarction, but also to predict short-term risk of cardiac events to help guide management. This thoughtful and comprehensive analysis is the largest study assessing the added value of clinical and ECG assessment to the prognostication by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin algorithms in patients evaluated for chest pain. It reinforces the accuracy of hs-cTn at presentation and after 1 hour (ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h) algorithms to predict AMI and 30-day AMI-related events.
It is important to note that if unstable angina had been included as a major adverse cardiac event, the study would have found that the extended algorithm performs better than the hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm in the prediction of this endpoint.
Germán Cediel, MD, is from Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol in Spain, Alfredo Bardají, MD, is from the Joan XXIII University Hospital in Spain, and José A. Barrabés, MD, is from Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. The comments are adapted from an editorial (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.065). The authors declared support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund, and declared consultancies and educational activities with the pharmaceutical sector.
Adding electrocardiogram findings and clinical assessment to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements in patients presenting with chest pain could improve predictions of their risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events, particularly unstable angina, research suggests.
Investigators reported outcomes of a prospective study involving 3,123 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The findings are in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The aim of the researchers was to validate an extended algorithm that combined the European Society of Cardiology’s high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurement at presentation and after 1 hour (ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm) with clinical assessment and ECG findings to aid prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days.
The clinical assessment involved the treating ED physician’s use of a visual analog scale to assess the patient’s pretest probability for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with a score above 70% qualifying as high likelihood.
The researchers found that the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm alone triaged significantly more patients toward rule-out for MACE than did the extended algorithm (60% vs. 45%, P less than .001). This resulted in 487 patients being reclassified toward “observe” by the extended algorithm, and among this group the 30-day MACE rate was 1.1%.
However, the 30-day MACE rates were similar in the two groups – 0.6% among those ruled out by the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm alone and 0.4% in those ruled out by the extended algorithm – resulting in a similar negative predictive value.
“These estimates will help clinicians to appropriately manage patients triaged toward rule-out according to the ESC hs-cTnT 0/1 h algorithm, in whom either the [visual analog scale] for ACS or the ECG still suggests the presence of an ACS,” wrote Thomas Nestelberger, MD, of the Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (Switzerland) at the University of Basel, and coinvestigators.
The ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm also ruled in fewer patients than did the extended algorithm (16% vs. 26%, P less than .001), giving it a higher positive predictive value.
When the researchers added unstable angina to the major adverse cardiac event outcome, they found the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm had a lower negative predictive value and a higher negative likelihood ratio compared with the extended algorithm for patients ruled out, but a higher positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio for patients ruled in.
“Our findings corroborate and extend previous research regarding the development and validation of algorithms for the safe and effective rule-out and rule-in of MACE in patients with symptoms suggestive of AMI,” the authors wrote.
This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the European Union, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, the University Hospital Basel, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Biomerieux, BRAHMS, Roche, Nanosphere, Siemens, Ortho Diagnostics, and Singulex. Several authors reported grants and support from the pharmaceutical sector.
SOURCE: Nestelberger T et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.025.
Adding electrocardiogram findings and clinical assessment to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements in patients presenting with chest pain could improve predictions of their risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events, particularly unstable angina, research suggests.
Investigators reported outcomes of a prospective study involving 3,123 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The findings are in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The aim of the researchers was to validate an extended algorithm that combined the European Society of Cardiology’s high-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurement at presentation and after 1 hour (ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm) with clinical assessment and ECG findings to aid prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days.
The clinical assessment involved the treating ED physician’s use of a visual analog scale to assess the patient’s pretest probability for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with a score above 70% qualifying as high likelihood.
The researchers found that the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm alone triaged significantly more patients toward rule-out for MACE than did the extended algorithm (60% vs. 45%, P less than .001). This resulted in 487 patients being reclassified toward “observe” by the extended algorithm, and among this group the 30-day MACE rate was 1.1%.
However, the 30-day MACE rates were similar in the two groups – 0.6% among those ruled out by the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm alone and 0.4% in those ruled out by the extended algorithm – resulting in a similar negative predictive value.
“These estimates will help clinicians to appropriately manage patients triaged toward rule-out according to the ESC hs-cTnT 0/1 h algorithm, in whom either the [visual analog scale] for ACS or the ECG still suggests the presence of an ACS,” wrote Thomas Nestelberger, MD, of the Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (Switzerland) at the University of Basel, and coinvestigators.
The ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm also ruled in fewer patients than did the extended algorithm (16% vs. 26%, P less than .001), giving it a higher positive predictive value.
When the researchers added unstable angina to the major adverse cardiac event outcome, they found the ESC hs-cTn 0/1 h algorithm had a lower negative predictive value and a higher negative likelihood ratio compared with the extended algorithm for patients ruled out, but a higher positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio for patients ruled in.
“Our findings corroborate and extend previous research regarding the development and validation of algorithms for the safe and effective rule-out and rule-in of MACE in patients with symptoms suggestive of AMI,” the authors wrote.
This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the European Union, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, the University Hospital Basel, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Biomerieux, BRAHMS, Roche, Nanosphere, Siemens, Ortho Diagnostics, and Singulex. Several authors reported grants and support from the pharmaceutical sector.
SOURCE: Nestelberger T et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.025.
FROM JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin measurements combined with ECG and clinical assessment can help rule out MACE and unstable angina.
Study details: A prospective study of 3,123 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.
Disclosures: This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the European Union, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation Basel, the University Hospital Basel, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Biomerieux, BRAHMS, Roche, NanoSphere, Siemens, Ortho Diagnostics, and Singulex. Several authors reported grants and support from the pharmaceutical sector.
Source: Nestelberger T et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Aug 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.025.
Undiagnosed COPD may change heart function before heart attacks occur
, data from a clinical trial suggest.
The finding could represent an opportunity for early intervention, Rita Pavasini, MD, wrote in COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
“Early change of the right ventricular function, as detected by reduced right ventricular strain and reduced fractional area change, is present in [these] patients,” wrote Dr. Pavasini of Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy. “Further studies are warranted to determine whether these alterations can be reversed or modulated by an early identification and treatment and whether targeting early right ventricular strain reduction results in better clinical outcomes in these comorbid patients.”
Dr. Pavasini and colleagues reported a prespecified subanalysis of the Screening for COPD in ACS Patients (SCAP) trial, which showed that screening patients admitted for acute coronary syndromes with respiratory measures could identify those at risk for undiagnosed COPD. The substudy examined the echocardiographic characteristics of these patients.
SCAP comprised 137 patients who were current or past smokers. At baseline, 29% had a COPD diagnosis. However, most displayed airflow limitation (59% mild, 38% moderate). All underwent transthoracic echocardiogram at baseline and at 6 months.
At baseline, fractional area change (FAC) was already significantly lower in patients with occult COPD than in those without it (38% vs. 44%). Patients with undiagnosed COPD also had significantly reduced right ventricular strain (RVS) (–15 vs. –20).
“Interestingly, the inferior location of myocardial infarction did not influence the results,” the authors said. “Indeed, RVS and FAC did not differ between patients with inferior location of myocardial infarction vs. those without inferior location.”
At 6 months, these differences were unabated. FAC was still significantly lower among those with COPD (37% vs. 46%), and RVS still significantly less (–16 vs. –20). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was also significantly higher in patients with concomitant COPD (35 vs. 27 mm Hg).
“The early impairment in RVS might reflect the impact of endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness and inflammation on right heart function, rather than only hypoxia, and even more in a population with mainly mild to moderate COPD,” the team said. “Thus, it is highly probable that sPAP in patients with undiagnosed COPD is mainly determined by concomitant pulmonary disease, which did not differ between acute and chronic phase.”
On the whole, the data suggest that the impairment of right ventricular strain was primarily related to the undiagnosed COPD, and not the cardiovascular event, they said,
“These data are consistent with the observed impairment of RVS and indirectly confirms that undiagnosed COPD determines early changes in the structure and function of the right heart.”
Dr. Pavasini had no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Pavasini R et al. COPD 2019 Jul 21. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.16451059.
, data from a clinical trial suggest.
The finding could represent an opportunity for early intervention, Rita Pavasini, MD, wrote in COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
“Early change of the right ventricular function, as detected by reduced right ventricular strain and reduced fractional area change, is present in [these] patients,” wrote Dr. Pavasini of Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy. “Further studies are warranted to determine whether these alterations can be reversed or modulated by an early identification and treatment and whether targeting early right ventricular strain reduction results in better clinical outcomes in these comorbid patients.”
Dr. Pavasini and colleagues reported a prespecified subanalysis of the Screening for COPD in ACS Patients (SCAP) trial, which showed that screening patients admitted for acute coronary syndromes with respiratory measures could identify those at risk for undiagnosed COPD. The substudy examined the echocardiographic characteristics of these patients.
SCAP comprised 137 patients who were current or past smokers. At baseline, 29% had a COPD diagnosis. However, most displayed airflow limitation (59% mild, 38% moderate). All underwent transthoracic echocardiogram at baseline and at 6 months.
At baseline, fractional area change (FAC) was already significantly lower in patients with occult COPD than in those without it (38% vs. 44%). Patients with undiagnosed COPD also had significantly reduced right ventricular strain (RVS) (–15 vs. –20).
“Interestingly, the inferior location of myocardial infarction did not influence the results,” the authors said. “Indeed, RVS and FAC did not differ between patients with inferior location of myocardial infarction vs. those without inferior location.”
At 6 months, these differences were unabated. FAC was still significantly lower among those with COPD (37% vs. 46%), and RVS still significantly less (–16 vs. –20). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was also significantly higher in patients with concomitant COPD (35 vs. 27 mm Hg).
“The early impairment in RVS might reflect the impact of endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness and inflammation on right heart function, rather than only hypoxia, and even more in a population with mainly mild to moderate COPD,” the team said. “Thus, it is highly probable that sPAP in patients with undiagnosed COPD is mainly determined by concomitant pulmonary disease, which did not differ between acute and chronic phase.”
On the whole, the data suggest that the impairment of right ventricular strain was primarily related to the undiagnosed COPD, and not the cardiovascular event, they said,
“These data are consistent with the observed impairment of RVS and indirectly confirms that undiagnosed COPD determines early changes in the structure and function of the right heart.”
Dr. Pavasini had no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Pavasini R et al. COPD 2019 Jul 21. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.16451059.
, data from a clinical trial suggest.
The finding could represent an opportunity for early intervention, Rita Pavasini, MD, wrote in COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
“Early change of the right ventricular function, as detected by reduced right ventricular strain and reduced fractional area change, is present in [these] patients,” wrote Dr. Pavasini of Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy. “Further studies are warranted to determine whether these alterations can be reversed or modulated by an early identification and treatment and whether targeting early right ventricular strain reduction results in better clinical outcomes in these comorbid patients.”
Dr. Pavasini and colleagues reported a prespecified subanalysis of the Screening for COPD in ACS Patients (SCAP) trial, which showed that screening patients admitted for acute coronary syndromes with respiratory measures could identify those at risk for undiagnosed COPD. The substudy examined the echocardiographic characteristics of these patients.
SCAP comprised 137 patients who were current or past smokers. At baseline, 29% had a COPD diagnosis. However, most displayed airflow limitation (59% mild, 38% moderate). All underwent transthoracic echocardiogram at baseline and at 6 months.
At baseline, fractional area change (FAC) was already significantly lower in patients with occult COPD than in those without it (38% vs. 44%). Patients with undiagnosed COPD also had significantly reduced right ventricular strain (RVS) (–15 vs. –20).
“Interestingly, the inferior location of myocardial infarction did not influence the results,” the authors said. “Indeed, RVS and FAC did not differ between patients with inferior location of myocardial infarction vs. those without inferior location.”
At 6 months, these differences were unabated. FAC was still significantly lower among those with COPD (37% vs. 46%), and RVS still significantly less (–16 vs. –20). Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was also significantly higher in patients with concomitant COPD (35 vs. 27 mm Hg).
“The early impairment in RVS might reflect the impact of endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness and inflammation on right heart function, rather than only hypoxia, and even more in a population with mainly mild to moderate COPD,” the team said. “Thus, it is highly probable that sPAP in patients with undiagnosed COPD is mainly determined by concomitant pulmonary disease, which did not differ between acute and chronic phase.”
On the whole, the data suggest that the impairment of right ventricular strain was primarily related to the undiagnosed COPD, and not the cardiovascular event, they said,
“These data are consistent with the observed impairment of RVS and indirectly confirms that undiagnosed COPD determines early changes in the structure and function of the right heart.”
Dr. Pavasini had no relevant financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Pavasini R et al. COPD 2019 Jul 21. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2019.16451059.
FROM COPD: JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE
Increased cardiovascular risk seen early on with testosterone replacement therapy
Testosterone replacement therapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in older men, particularly during the first 2 years of use, a study in the American Journal of Medicine has found.
Simone Y. Loo of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and colleagues looked at a cohort of 15,401 men aged 45 years or older with low testosterone levels, of whom 4,485 (29.1%) were prescribed testosterone replacement therapy on at least one occasion during a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. They saw that individuals who were currently using testosterone replacement therapy had a 21% increase in the risk of the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction, compared with those who had not had hormone therapy.
In the first 6 months to 2 years after initiation of continuous treatment, the risk was even higher – at 35% – and was particularly high in individuals aged 45-59 years (at 44%).
However, the study also noted a significant 36% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality in individuals currently using testosterone replacement therapy and a significant 28% higher risk of all-cause mortality in past users, compared with nonusers.
Concerns about the safety of testosterone replacement therapy had previously been kindled by the outcomes of the Testosterone in Older Men trial, which was stopped early because of the higher number of cardiovascular events in the treatment group. However, other randomized controlled trials have not seen that effect, the authors said.
They noted that the protective effect of current hormone replacement use on mortality was surprising, but suggested it could be the result of reverse causality, “in which physicians may discontinue TRT based on perceived deterioration of health or imminent death, because TRT is not a vital medication.”
“Moreover, TRT may be less frequently initiated among men with a higher baseline risk of mortality, particularly in the elderly, and those who received TRT may have been healthier overall, compared with their untreated counterparts,” the authors wrote.
Despite this, they suggested that larger observational studies were still needed to investigate the potential harms of testosterone replacement therapy. In the meantime, they advised that potential harms should be weighed against perceived benefits and caution be applied to prescribing.
The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: Loo S et al. Am J Med 2019 Apr 3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.022.
Testosterone replacement therapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in older men, particularly during the first 2 years of use, a study in the American Journal of Medicine has found.
Simone Y. Loo of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and colleagues looked at a cohort of 15,401 men aged 45 years or older with low testosterone levels, of whom 4,485 (29.1%) were prescribed testosterone replacement therapy on at least one occasion during a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. They saw that individuals who were currently using testosterone replacement therapy had a 21% increase in the risk of the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction, compared with those who had not had hormone therapy.
In the first 6 months to 2 years after initiation of continuous treatment, the risk was even higher – at 35% – and was particularly high in individuals aged 45-59 years (at 44%).
However, the study also noted a significant 36% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality in individuals currently using testosterone replacement therapy and a significant 28% higher risk of all-cause mortality in past users, compared with nonusers.
Concerns about the safety of testosterone replacement therapy had previously been kindled by the outcomes of the Testosterone in Older Men trial, which was stopped early because of the higher number of cardiovascular events in the treatment group. However, other randomized controlled trials have not seen that effect, the authors said.
They noted that the protective effect of current hormone replacement use on mortality was surprising, but suggested it could be the result of reverse causality, “in which physicians may discontinue TRT based on perceived deterioration of health or imminent death, because TRT is not a vital medication.”
“Moreover, TRT may be less frequently initiated among men with a higher baseline risk of mortality, particularly in the elderly, and those who received TRT may have been healthier overall, compared with their untreated counterparts,” the authors wrote.
Despite this, they suggested that larger observational studies were still needed to investigate the potential harms of testosterone replacement therapy. In the meantime, they advised that potential harms should be weighed against perceived benefits and caution be applied to prescribing.
The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: Loo S et al. Am J Med 2019 Apr 3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.022.
Testosterone replacement therapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in older men, particularly during the first 2 years of use, a study in the American Journal of Medicine has found.
Simone Y. Loo of the Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and colleagues looked at a cohort of 15,401 men aged 45 years or older with low testosterone levels, of whom 4,485 (29.1%) were prescribed testosterone replacement therapy on at least one occasion during a mean follow-up of 4.7 years. They saw that individuals who were currently using testosterone replacement therapy had a 21% increase in the risk of the composite outcome of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction, compared with those who had not had hormone therapy.
In the first 6 months to 2 years after initiation of continuous treatment, the risk was even higher – at 35% – and was particularly high in individuals aged 45-59 years (at 44%).
However, the study also noted a significant 36% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality in individuals currently using testosterone replacement therapy and a significant 28% higher risk of all-cause mortality in past users, compared with nonusers.
Concerns about the safety of testosterone replacement therapy had previously been kindled by the outcomes of the Testosterone in Older Men trial, which was stopped early because of the higher number of cardiovascular events in the treatment group. However, other randomized controlled trials have not seen that effect, the authors said.
They noted that the protective effect of current hormone replacement use on mortality was surprising, but suggested it could be the result of reverse causality, “in which physicians may discontinue TRT based on perceived deterioration of health or imminent death, because TRT is not a vital medication.”
“Moreover, TRT may be less frequently initiated among men with a higher baseline risk of mortality, particularly in the elderly, and those who received TRT may have been healthier overall, compared with their untreated counterparts,” the authors wrote.
Despite this, they suggested that larger observational studies were still needed to investigate the potential harms of testosterone replacement therapy. In the meantime, they advised that potential harms should be weighed against perceived benefits and caution be applied to prescribing.
The study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. No conflicts of interest were reported.
SOURCE: Loo S et al. Am J Med 2019 Apr 3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.022.
FROM THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Air pollution levels correlated with cardiorespiratory mortality, reduced life expectancy
particularly among lower-income populations, research suggests.
A study published in PLOS Medicine used vital registration and population data from across the United States for 1999-2015 to estimate the number of deaths and loss of life expectancy associated with four different models of concentrations of fine particulate matter pollution, and examine how that has changed over time.
While the current national ambient air quality standard for particle pollution is 12 mcg/m3 in almost all counties, the study found that in 1999, 59% of the 1,339 county units had concentrations above this level. At that time, the population-weighted average fine particulate matter pollution concentration for the entire country was 13.6mcg/m3. The highest level was seen in Fresno county in California, which had a fine particulate pollution concentration of 22.1 mcg/m3.
By 2015, national concentrations had declined to 8.0 mcg/m3, and the lowest observed concentration was 2.8 mcg/m3.
The investigators wrote, “Each model was applied to county-level cardiorespiratory death rates separately by sex and age group (5-year age groups from birth to 85 years and 85 years and older) because death rates vary by age group and sex, as might their associations with air pollution. From each model we estimated age-specific proportional increases in death rates (i.e. rate ratios) for each 1 mcg/m3 of PM2.5 [fine particulate matter].” The analysis revealed that fine particulate matter pollution above the lowest observed concentration of 2.8 mcg/m3 was associated with higher death rates from cardiorespiratory diseases.
Overall, researchers estimated that these higher levels contributed to 15,612 deaths from cardiorespiratory diseases in women and 14,757 deaths in men, representing 2.8% and 2.7% of all cardiorespiratory deaths, respectively. This amounted to 0.15 years of life expectancy lost in women and 0.13 years lost in men.
There was significant variation in the cost to life expectancy around the country. In the midwestern and Rocky Mountain counties in states such as New Mexico, Colorado, and Arizona, which had lower levels of air pollution, life expectancy loss was less than 0.05 years. But in southern states where the air pollution levels were highest, such as Arkansas, Oklahoma, Alabama, and around Los Angeles, the life expectancy loss was greater than 0.3 years.
“While current PM2.5 pollution is responsible for a significant mortality burden and loss of longevity, reductions in pollution since the late 1990s have benefited virtually the entire country, with the exception of 14 counties where PM2.5 increased slightly over this period,” wrote James E. Bennett, PhD, of the School of Public Health at Imperial College London and coauthors.
The primary limitation of the study is that this association between air pollution and cardiorespiratory health or life expectancy cannot be shown to be causal. Other pollutants and other environmental and behavioral factors that impact cardiorespiratory health may be significant. For example, including ozone and nitrogen dioxide levels in the models could result in different results in terms of the impact of PM2.5 on cardiorespiratory health.
The data highlighted that life expectancy loss associated with air pollution was larger in lower-income counties, those where a higher proportion of the population had a family income below the poverty line, and those where a higher proportion of the population were black or African American.
“This inequality in mortality burden occurs because lower-income counties, those with more poverty, with a greater proportion who are of black or African American race, or with a lower proportion who have graduated high school tend to have higher baseline death rates at any pollution level because of conditions associated with these covariates and hence experience a larger absolute number of deaths as a result of air pollution,” the authors wrote.
The study was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Wellcome Trust. One author declared grants and personal fees from private industry, outside the submitted work.
SOURCE: Bennett JE et al. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002856.
particularly among lower-income populations, research suggests.
A study published in PLOS Medicine used vital registration and population data from across the United States for 1999-2015 to estimate the number of deaths and loss of life expectancy associated with four different models of concentrations of fine particulate matter pollution, and examine how that has changed over time.
While the current national ambient air quality standard for particle pollution is 12 mcg/m3 in almost all counties, the study found that in 1999, 59% of the 1,339 county units had concentrations above this level. At that time, the population-weighted average fine particulate matter pollution concentration for the entire country was 13.6mcg/m3. The highest level was seen in Fresno county in California, which had a fine particulate pollution concentration of 22.1 mcg/m3.
By 2015, national concentrations had declined to 8.0 mcg/m3, and the lowest observed concentration was 2.8 mcg/m3.
The investigators wrote, “Each model was applied to county-level cardiorespiratory death rates separately by sex and age group (5-year age groups from birth to 85 years and 85 years and older) because death rates vary by age group and sex, as might their associations with air pollution. From each model we estimated age-specific proportional increases in death rates (i.e. rate ratios) for each 1 mcg/m3 of PM2.5 [fine particulate matter].” The analysis revealed that fine particulate matter pollution above the lowest observed concentration of 2.8 mcg/m3 was associated with higher death rates from cardiorespiratory diseases.
Overall, researchers estimated that these higher levels contributed to 15,612 deaths from cardiorespiratory diseases in women and 14,757 deaths in men, representing 2.8% and 2.7% of all cardiorespiratory deaths, respectively. This amounted to 0.15 years of life expectancy lost in women and 0.13 years lost in men.
There was significant variation in the cost to life expectancy around the country. In the midwestern and Rocky Mountain counties in states such as New Mexico, Colorado, and Arizona, which had lower levels of air pollution, life expectancy loss was less than 0.05 years. But in southern states where the air pollution levels were highest, such as Arkansas, Oklahoma, Alabama, and around Los Angeles, the life expectancy loss was greater than 0.3 years.
“While current PM2.5 pollution is responsible for a significant mortality burden and loss of longevity, reductions in pollution since the late 1990s have benefited virtually the entire country, with the exception of 14 counties where PM2.5 increased slightly over this period,” wrote James E. Bennett, PhD, of the School of Public Health at Imperial College London and coauthors.
The primary limitation of the study is that this association between air pollution and cardiorespiratory health or life expectancy cannot be shown to be causal. Other pollutants and other environmental and behavioral factors that impact cardiorespiratory health may be significant. For example, including ozone and nitrogen dioxide levels in the models could result in different results in terms of the impact of PM2.5 on cardiorespiratory health.
The data highlighted that life expectancy loss associated with air pollution was larger in lower-income counties, those where a higher proportion of the population had a family income below the poverty line, and those where a higher proportion of the population were black or African American.
“This inequality in mortality burden occurs because lower-income counties, those with more poverty, with a greater proportion who are of black or African American race, or with a lower proportion who have graduated high school tend to have higher baseline death rates at any pollution level because of conditions associated with these covariates and hence experience a larger absolute number of deaths as a result of air pollution,” the authors wrote.
The study was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Wellcome Trust. One author declared grants and personal fees from private industry, outside the submitted work.
SOURCE: Bennett JE et al. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002856.
particularly among lower-income populations, research suggests.
A study published in PLOS Medicine used vital registration and population data from across the United States for 1999-2015 to estimate the number of deaths and loss of life expectancy associated with four different models of concentrations of fine particulate matter pollution, and examine how that has changed over time.
While the current national ambient air quality standard for particle pollution is 12 mcg/m3 in almost all counties, the study found that in 1999, 59% of the 1,339 county units had concentrations above this level. At that time, the population-weighted average fine particulate matter pollution concentration for the entire country was 13.6mcg/m3. The highest level was seen in Fresno county in California, which had a fine particulate pollution concentration of 22.1 mcg/m3.
By 2015, national concentrations had declined to 8.0 mcg/m3, and the lowest observed concentration was 2.8 mcg/m3.
The investigators wrote, “Each model was applied to county-level cardiorespiratory death rates separately by sex and age group (5-year age groups from birth to 85 years and 85 years and older) because death rates vary by age group and sex, as might their associations with air pollution. From each model we estimated age-specific proportional increases in death rates (i.e. rate ratios) for each 1 mcg/m3 of PM2.5 [fine particulate matter].” The analysis revealed that fine particulate matter pollution above the lowest observed concentration of 2.8 mcg/m3 was associated with higher death rates from cardiorespiratory diseases.
Overall, researchers estimated that these higher levels contributed to 15,612 deaths from cardiorespiratory diseases in women and 14,757 deaths in men, representing 2.8% and 2.7% of all cardiorespiratory deaths, respectively. This amounted to 0.15 years of life expectancy lost in women and 0.13 years lost in men.
There was significant variation in the cost to life expectancy around the country. In the midwestern and Rocky Mountain counties in states such as New Mexico, Colorado, and Arizona, which had lower levels of air pollution, life expectancy loss was less than 0.05 years. But in southern states where the air pollution levels were highest, such as Arkansas, Oklahoma, Alabama, and around Los Angeles, the life expectancy loss was greater than 0.3 years.
“While current PM2.5 pollution is responsible for a significant mortality burden and loss of longevity, reductions in pollution since the late 1990s have benefited virtually the entire country, with the exception of 14 counties where PM2.5 increased slightly over this period,” wrote James E. Bennett, PhD, of the School of Public Health at Imperial College London and coauthors.
The primary limitation of the study is that this association between air pollution and cardiorespiratory health or life expectancy cannot be shown to be causal. Other pollutants and other environmental and behavioral factors that impact cardiorespiratory health may be significant. For example, including ozone and nitrogen dioxide levels in the models could result in different results in terms of the impact of PM2.5 on cardiorespiratory health.
The data highlighted that life expectancy loss associated with air pollution was larger in lower-income counties, those where a higher proportion of the population had a family income below the poverty line, and those where a higher proportion of the population were black or African American.
“This inequality in mortality burden occurs because lower-income counties, those with more poverty, with a greater proportion who are of black or African American race, or with a lower proportion who have graduated high school tend to have higher baseline death rates at any pollution level because of conditions associated with these covariates and hence experience a larger absolute number of deaths as a result of air pollution,” the authors wrote.
The study was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Wellcome Trust. One author declared grants and personal fees from private industry, outside the submitted work.
SOURCE: Bennett JE et al. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002856.
FROM PLOS MEDICINE
Key clinical point: Air pollution linked to reduced life expectancy, particularly in poorer areas.
Major finding: Fine particulate matter air pollution linked to 0.15 years of life expectancy lost in women and 0.13 years lost in men.
Study details: Population-wide data analysis for the United States.
Disclosures: The study was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Wellcome Trust. One author declared grants and personal fees from private industry outside the submitted work.
Source: Bennett JE et al. PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002856.
Atherosclerotic disease risk persists decades after smoking cessation
Adults who quit smoking reduced their risk for peripheral artery disease in the short term, but remained at increased risk for up to 30 years, compared with never-smokers, based on data from more than 13,000 adults in a community-based study.
Most reports on the impact of smoking cessation on cardiovascular disease have focused on coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke, while data on the effects of smoking cessation on peripheral artery disease (PAD) are limited, wrote Ning Ding, MBBS, SCM, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md., and colleagues.
To compare the impact of smoking on PAD, CHD, and stroke, the researchers used data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, which included 15,792 adults aged 45-64 years in four communities. The findings were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The study population of 13,355 individuals had no baseline history of PAD, CHD, or stroke. Over a median 26 years of follow-up, the researchers identified 492 cases of PAD, 1,798 cases of CHD, and 1,106 cases of stroke.
The risk of all three conditions began to decline within 5 years of smoking cessation, which could be encouraging to smokers who wish to quit, the researchers noted. In addition, the longer the duration of smoking cessation, the lower the risk for all three conditions (See central illustration).
However, a significantly elevated risk remained for PAD for up to 30 years after smoking cessation and for CHD for up to 20 years after smoking cessation, compared with never-smokers.
The researchers also found a roughly fourfold increased risk for PAD for smokers who smoked for 40 or more pack-years, compared with never-smokers, which was greater than the 2.1 hazard ratio for CHD and 1.8 HR for stroke. In addition, current smokers of at least one pack per day had a significantly greater risk of PAD, compared with never-smokers (HR, 5.36) that was higher than the risk for CHD or stroke (HR, 2.38 and HR, 1.88, respectively).
The study findings were limited by several factors including the reliance on self-reports, potential misclassification of data, and the potential exclusion of mild PAD cases that did not require hospitalization, the researchers noted. However, the results support the value of encouraging smokers to quit and support the need to include PAD risk in public health information, they said. “Although public statements about smoking and [cardiovascular disease] have been focusing on CHD and stroke, our results indicate the need to take account of PAD as well for comprehensively acknowledging the effect of smoking on overall cardiovascular health,” they added.
The ARIC study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Lead author Dr. Ding had no financial conflicts to disclose; coauthors disclosed relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb and Fukuda Denshi.
SOURCE: Ding N et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 22;74:498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.003.
Although the pathophysiology of smoking and cardiovascular disease has yet to be teased out, the current study findings support the public health message that any and all smokers can improve their health by quitting any time: “It is never too early or too late to benefit from quitting,” wrote Nancy A. Rigotti, MD, and Mary M. McDermott, MD, in an accompanying editorial. The editorialists questioned whether the findings were generalizable to patients with mild PAD or those who are not hospitalized. However, they found the data consistent with previous studies suggesting that atherosclerosis is not homogeneous. “Differences in shear stress and hemodynamic forces among the femoral, coronary, and carotid arterial beds may also explain variability in associations of smoking and smoking cessation with the incidence of PAD versus myocardial infarction or stroke,” they said.
The findings also support the need to emphasize PAD in public health messages and provide an opportunity to educate patients about the risks of limb loss and impaired mobility associated with PAD, they said.
Many clinicians put a low priority on smoking cessation, the editorialists wrote, but “long-term tobacco abstinence is achievable using a chronic disease management approach resembling the strategies used to manage other risk factors,” they said. They cited the American College of Cardiology’s recently released “Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Tobacco Cessation Treatment.” The pathway outlines advice for clinicians, including how to provide a brief intervention and resources along with advice to quit smoking.
Dr. Rigotti is affiliated with Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. McDermott is affiliated with Northwestern University, Chicago. Dr. Rigotti disclosed royalties from UpToDate, serving as a consultant for Achieve Life Sciences, and travel expenses from Pfizer for unpaid consulting. Dr. McDermott disclosed research funding from Regeneron, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, and the American Heart Association, plus research support from Chromadex, ReserveAge, Hershey, and ViroMed.
Although the pathophysiology of smoking and cardiovascular disease has yet to be teased out, the current study findings support the public health message that any and all smokers can improve their health by quitting any time: “It is never too early or too late to benefit from quitting,” wrote Nancy A. Rigotti, MD, and Mary M. McDermott, MD, in an accompanying editorial. The editorialists questioned whether the findings were generalizable to patients with mild PAD or those who are not hospitalized. However, they found the data consistent with previous studies suggesting that atherosclerosis is not homogeneous. “Differences in shear stress and hemodynamic forces among the femoral, coronary, and carotid arterial beds may also explain variability in associations of smoking and smoking cessation with the incidence of PAD versus myocardial infarction or stroke,” they said.
The findings also support the need to emphasize PAD in public health messages and provide an opportunity to educate patients about the risks of limb loss and impaired mobility associated with PAD, they said.
Many clinicians put a low priority on smoking cessation, the editorialists wrote, but “long-term tobacco abstinence is achievable using a chronic disease management approach resembling the strategies used to manage other risk factors,” they said. They cited the American College of Cardiology’s recently released “Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Tobacco Cessation Treatment.” The pathway outlines advice for clinicians, including how to provide a brief intervention and resources along with advice to quit smoking.
Dr. Rigotti is affiliated with Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. McDermott is affiliated with Northwestern University, Chicago. Dr. Rigotti disclosed royalties from UpToDate, serving as a consultant for Achieve Life Sciences, and travel expenses from Pfizer for unpaid consulting. Dr. McDermott disclosed research funding from Regeneron, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, and the American Heart Association, plus research support from Chromadex, ReserveAge, Hershey, and ViroMed.
Although the pathophysiology of smoking and cardiovascular disease has yet to be teased out, the current study findings support the public health message that any and all smokers can improve their health by quitting any time: “It is never too early or too late to benefit from quitting,” wrote Nancy A. Rigotti, MD, and Mary M. McDermott, MD, in an accompanying editorial. The editorialists questioned whether the findings were generalizable to patients with mild PAD or those who are not hospitalized. However, they found the data consistent with previous studies suggesting that atherosclerosis is not homogeneous. “Differences in shear stress and hemodynamic forces among the femoral, coronary, and carotid arterial beds may also explain variability in associations of smoking and smoking cessation with the incidence of PAD versus myocardial infarction or stroke,” they said.
The findings also support the need to emphasize PAD in public health messages and provide an opportunity to educate patients about the risks of limb loss and impaired mobility associated with PAD, they said.
Many clinicians put a low priority on smoking cessation, the editorialists wrote, but “long-term tobacco abstinence is achievable using a chronic disease management approach resembling the strategies used to manage other risk factors,” they said. They cited the American College of Cardiology’s recently released “Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Tobacco Cessation Treatment.” The pathway outlines advice for clinicians, including how to provide a brief intervention and resources along with advice to quit smoking.
Dr. Rigotti is affiliated with Harvard Medical School, Boston. Dr. McDermott is affiliated with Northwestern University, Chicago. Dr. Rigotti disclosed royalties from UpToDate, serving as a consultant for Achieve Life Sciences, and travel expenses from Pfizer for unpaid consulting. Dr. McDermott disclosed research funding from Regeneron, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the National Institute on Aging, and the American Heart Association, plus research support from Chromadex, ReserveAge, Hershey, and ViroMed.
Adults who quit smoking reduced their risk for peripheral artery disease in the short term, but remained at increased risk for up to 30 years, compared with never-smokers, based on data from more than 13,000 adults in a community-based study.
Most reports on the impact of smoking cessation on cardiovascular disease have focused on coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke, while data on the effects of smoking cessation on peripheral artery disease (PAD) are limited, wrote Ning Ding, MBBS, SCM, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md., and colleagues.
To compare the impact of smoking on PAD, CHD, and stroke, the researchers used data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, which included 15,792 adults aged 45-64 years in four communities. The findings were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The study population of 13,355 individuals had no baseline history of PAD, CHD, or stroke. Over a median 26 years of follow-up, the researchers identified 492 cases of PAD, 1,798 cases of CHD, and 1,106 cases of stroke.
The risk of all three conditions began to decline within 5 years of smoking cessation, which could be encouraging to smokers who wish to quit, the researchers noted. In addition, the longer the duration of smoking cessation, the lower the risk for all three conditions (See central illustration).
However, a significantly elevated risk remained for PAD for up to 30 years after smoking cessation and for CHD for up to 20 years after smoking cessation, compared with never-smokers.
The researchers also found a roughly fourfold increased risk for PAD for smokers who smoked for 40 or more pack-years, compared with never-smokers, which was greater than the 2.1 hazard ratio for CHD and 1.8 HR for stroke. In addition, current smokers of at least one pack per day had a significantly greater risk of PAD, compared with never-smokers (HR, 5.36) that was higher than the risk for CHD or stroke (HR, 2.38 and HR, 1.88, respectively).
The study findings were limited by several factors including the reliance on self-reports, potential misclassification of data, and the potential exclusion of mild PAD cases that did not require hospitalization, the researchers noted. However, the results support the value of encouraging smokers to quit and support the need to include PAD risk in public health information, they said. “Although public statements about smoking and [cardiovascular disease] have been focusing on CHD and stroke, our results indicate the need to take account of PAD as well for comprehensively acknowledging the effect of smoking on overall cardiovascular health,” they added.
The ARIC study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Lead author Dr. Ding had no financial conflicts to disclose; coauthors disclosed relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb and Fukuda Denshi.
SOURCE: Ding N et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 22;74:498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.003.
Adults who quit smoking reduced their risk for peripheral artery disease in the short term, but remained at increased risk for up to 30 years, compared with never-smokers, based on data from more than 13,000 adults in a community-based study.
Most reports on the impact of smoking cessation on cardiovascular disease have focused on coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke, while data on the effects of smoking cessation on peripheral artery disease (PAD) are limited, wrote Ning Ding, MBBS, SCM, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md., and colleagues.
To compare the impact of smoking on PAD, CHD, and stroke, the researchers used data from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, which included 15,792 adults aged 45-64 years in four communities. The findings were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The study population of 13,355 individuals had no baseline history of PAD, CHD, or stroke. Over a median 26 years of follow-up, the researchers identified 492 cases of PAD, 1,798 cases of CHD, and 1,106 cases of stroke.
The risk of all three conditions began to decline within 5 years of smoking cessation, which could be encouraging to smokers who wish to quit, the researchers noted. In addition, the longer the duration of smoking cessation, the lower the risk for all three conditions (See central illustration).
However, a significantly elevated risk remained for PAD for up to 30 years after smoking cessation and for CHD for up to 20 years after smoking cessation, compared with never-smokers.
The researchers also found a roughly fourfold increased risk for PAD for smokers who smoked for 40 or more pack-years, compared with never-smokers, which was greater than the 2.1 hazard ratio for CHD and 1.8 HR for stroke. In addition, current smokers of at least one pack per day had a significantly greater risk of PAD, compared with never-smokers (HR, 5.36) that was higher than the risk for CHD or stroke (HR, 2.38 and HR, 1.88, respectively).
The study findings were limited by several factors including the reliance on self-reports, potential misclassification of data, and the potential exclusion of mild PAD cases that did not require hospitalization, the researchers noted. However, the results support the value of encouraging smokers to quit and support the need to include PAD risk in public health information, they said. “Although public statements about smoking and [cardiovascular disease] have been focusing on CHD and stroke, our results indicate the need to take account of PAD as well for comprehensively acknowledging the effect of smoking on overall cardiovascular health,” they added.
The ARIC study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. Lead author Dr. Ding had no financial conflicts to disclose; coauthors disclosed relationships with Bristol-Myers Squibb and Fukuda Denshi.
SOURCE: Ding N et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 22;74:498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.003.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY