Asthma patients who struggle with poor control despite using inhaled corticosteroids can benefit from additional treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) or single maintenance and reliever therapy, suggest data from a pair of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Asthma control remains a problem for many patients despite the daily use of inhaled corticosteroids. The current preferred adjunct therapy for patients aged 12 years and older is long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), wrote Diana M. Sobieraj, PharmD, of the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, and her colleagues in a study published in JAMA. The researchers examined the efficacy of other adjunct therapies and therapeutic regimes, including the use of a LAMA, in two studies of patients with persistent asthma.

MattZ90/thinkstockphotos

“Triple therapy was not significantly associated with improvements in rescue medication use vs. combined inhaled corticosteroids and LABA therapy,” the researchers added.

The review of LAMAs used as add-on therapy was limited by several factors, including a primary focus on tiotropium, a lack of analysis of harms or the costs of the various therapies, the lack of data for children, and an inability to perform a subgroup analysis, the researchers said. Although LAMA use was associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbation, compared with placebo use, the review could not adequately compare LAMA with controllers other than LABA, they added.

In the second analysis, which also was published in JAMA, the researchers evaluated the use of inhaled corticosteroids and LABAs as both a controller and quick-relief treatment, a strategy known as SMART, or Single Maintenance and Reliever Therapy. The SMART protocol, which is not approved in the United States, involved taking a combination of the corticosteroid budesonide and the LABA formoterol in a dry-powder inhaler in most of the studies reviewed.

Overall, in the analysis of 22,524 patients aged 12 years and older, an absolute risk difference of –2.8% for asthma exacerbations was seen in those who used the SMART protocol versus those who used a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled LABA as controller therapy.

In addition, data from 341 children aged 4-11 years showed a –12% absolute difference in risk of asthma exacerbation with the SMART therapy.

In trials that compared patients using the SMART protocol with those taking only the dose of inhaled corticosteroids called for by SMART, the protocol was associated with an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and a reduction in the need for rescue medication.

The SMART protocol also demonstrated advantages over taking the same dose of inhaled corticosteroid called for by SMART plus a LABA controller therapy or a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids with a LABA controller therapy. Specifically, SMART patients experienced a –6.4% risk of asthma exacerbations, versus the first comparator group; and a –2.7% risk of asthma, compared with the group who took a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids with LABA controller therapy.

No significant associations appeared in any of the studies between the SMART protocol and outcomes that included all-cause mortality or changes in FEV₁, forced vital capacity, or the percentage of predicted FEV₁, when compared with those for patients who used a LABA controller therapy plus inhaled corticosteroids at either dose.

The SMART protocol review was limited by factors that included a lack of data on adverse events, a lack of subgroup analysis, and the potential for bias, because of the open label nature of some of the studies, the researchers noted.

However, despite the limitations in both reviews, the results support the SMART strategy and LAMAs as alternatives for patients with persistent asthma, and highlight the need for further research, they noted.

The reviews were supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr. Sobieraj had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Sobieraj D et al. JAMA. 2018;319(14):1473-84. Sobieraj D et al. JAMA. 2018;319(14):1485-96.

Asthma patients who struggle with poor control despite using inhaled corticosteroids can benefit from additional treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) or single maintenance and reliever therapy, suggest data from a pair of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Asthma control remains a problem for many patients despite the daily use of inhaled corticosteroids. The current preferred adjunct therapy for patients aged 12 years and older is long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), wrote Diana M. Sobieraj, PharmD, of the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, and her colleagues in a study published in JAMA. The researchers examined the efficacy of other adjunct therapies and therapeutic regimes, including the use of a LAMA, in two studies of patients with persistent asthma.

MattZ90/thinkstockphotos

“Triple therapy was not significantly associated with improvements in rescue medication use vs. combined inhaled corticosteroids and LABA therapy,” the researchers added.

The review of LAMAs used as add-on therapy was limited by several factors, including a primary focus on tiotropium, a lack of analysis of harms or the costs of the various therapies, the lack of data for children, and an inability to perform a subgroup analysis, the researchers said. Although LAMA use was associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbation, compared with placebo use, the review could not adequately compare LAMA with controllers other than LABA, they added.

In the second analysis, which also was published in JAMA, the researchers evaluated the use of inhaled corticosteroids and LABAs as both a controller and quick-relief treatment, a strategy known as SMART, or Single Maintenance and Reliever Therapy. The SMART protocol, which is not approved in the United States, involved taking a combination of the corticosteroid budesonide and the LABA formoterol in a dry-powder inhaler in most of the studies reviewed.

Overall, in the analysis of 22,524 patients aged 12 years and older, an absolute risk difference of –2.8% for asthma exacerbations was seen in those who used the SMART protocol versus those who used a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled LABA as controller therapy.

In addition, data from 341 children aged 4-11 years showed a –12% absolute difference in risk of asthma exacerbation with the SMART therapy.

In trials that compared patients using the SMART protocol with those taking only the dose of inhaled corticosteroids called for by SMART, the protocol was associated with an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and a reduction in the need for rescue medication.

The SMART protocol also demonstrated advantages over taking the same dose of inhaled corticosteroid called for by SMART plus a LABA controller therapy or a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids with a LABA controller therapy. Specifically, SMART patients experienced a –6.4% risk of asthma exacerbations, versus the first comparator group; and a –2.7% risk of asthma, compared with the group who took a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids with LABA controller therapy.

No significant associations appeared in any of the studies between the SMART protocol and outcomes that included all-cause mortality or changes in FEV₁, forced vital capacity, or the percentage of predicted FEV₁, when compared with those for patients who used a LABA controller therapy plus inhaled corticosteroids at either dose.

The SMART protocol review was limited by factors that included a lack of data on adverse events, a lack of subgroup analysis, and the potential for bias, because of the open label nature of some of the studies, the researchers noted.

However, despite the limitations in both reviews, the results support the SMART strategy and LAMAs as alternatives for patients with persistent asthma, and highlight the need for further research, they noted.

The reviews were supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr. Sobieraj had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Sobieraj D et al. JAMA. 2018;319(14):1473-84. Sobieraj D et al. JAMA. 2018;319(14):1485-96.

Asthma patients who struggle with poor control despite using inhaled corticosteroids can benefit from additional treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) or single maintenance and reliever therapy, suggest data from a pair of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Asthma control remains a problem for many patients despite the daily use of inhaled corticosteroids. The current preferred adjunct therapy for patients aged 12 years and older is long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs), wrote Diana M. Sobieraj, PharmD, of the University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, and her colleagues in a study published in JAMA. The researchers examined the efficacy of other adjunct therapies and therapeutic regimes, including the use of a LAMA, in two studies of patients with persistent asthma.

MattZ90/thinkstockphotos

“Triple therapy was not significantly associated with improvements in rescue medication use vs. combined inhaled corticosteroids and LABA therapy,” the researchers added.

The review of LAMAs used as add-on therapy was limited by several factors, including a primary focus on tiotropium, a lack of analysis of harms or the costs of the various therapies, the lack of data for children, and an inability to perform a subgroup analysis, the researchers said. Although LAMA use was associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbation, compared with placebo use, the review could not adequately compare LAMA with controllers other than LABA, they added.

In the second analysis, which also was published in JAMA, the researchers evaluated the use of inhaled corticosteroids and LABAs as both a controller and quick-relief treatment, a strategy known as SMART, or Single Maintenance and Reliever Therapy. The SMART protocol, which is not approved in the United States, involved taking a combination of the corticosteroid budesonide and the LABA formoterol in a dry-powder inhaler in most of the studies reviewed.

Overall, in the analysis of 22,524 patients aged 12 years and older, an absolute risk difference of –2.8% for asthma exacerbations was seen in those who used the SMART protocol versus those who used a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled LABA as controller therapy.

In addition, data from 341 children aged 4-11 years showed a –12% absolute difference in risk of asthma exacerbation with the SMART therapy.

In trials that compared patients using the SMART protocol with those taking only the dose of inhaled corticosteroids called for by SMART, the protocol was associated with an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) and a reduction in the need for rescue medication.

The SMART protocol also demonstrated advantages over taking the same dose of inhaled corticosteroid called for by SMART plus a LABA controller therapy or a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids with a LABA controller therapy. Specifically, SMART patients experienced a –6.4% risk of asthma exacerbations, versus the first comparator group; and a –2.7% risk of asthma, compared with the group who took a higher dose of inhaled corticosteroids with LABA controller therapy.

No significant associations appeared in any of the studies between the SMART protocol and outcomes that included all-cause mortality or changes in FEV₁, forced vital capacity, or the percentage of predicted FEV₁, when compared with those for patients who used a LABA controller therapy plus inhaled corticosteroids at either dose.

The SMART protocol review was limited by factors that included a lack of data on adverse events, a lack of subgroup analysis, and the potential for bias, because of the open label nature of some of the studies, the researchers noted.

However, despite the limitations in both reviews, the results support the SMART strategy and LAMAs as alternatives for patients with persistent asthma, and highlight the need for further research, they noted.

The reviews were supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr. Sobieraj had no financial conflicts to disclose.

SOURCE: Sobieraj D et al. JAMA. 2018;319(14):1473-84. Sobieraj D et al. JAMA. 2018;319(14):1485-96.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease had about a 28% higher risk of Parkinson’s disease (PD) than that of matched controls in a large retrospective analysis of administrative health care claims.

But tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy appeared to attenuate this risk, wrote Inga Peter, PhD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and her associates. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who received TNF inhibitors were 78% less likely to develop PD than were those who did not (P = .03). “Reducing systemic inflammation in at-risk individuals may decrease the incidence of PD [Parkinson disease],” the researchers wrote. The study was published online April 23 in JAMA Neurology.

The researchers queried the Truven Health MarketScan database and the Medicare Supplemental Database for patients with IBD from 2000 through 2016. The databases included more than 170 million patients, of whom 144,018 had at least two IBD-related claims, at least 6 months of follow-up, and no baseline PD diagnosis. These patients were matched by age, sex, and treatment year with 720,090 individuals without IBD from the same databases.

A total of 1,796 patients had at least two recorded PD diagnoses and had filled at least one associated prescription, said the researchers. Based on this PD definition, patients with IBD developed PD at a 28% higher rate than that of matched controls (adjusted IRR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.44; P less than .001).

Among the IBD patients, those receiving anti-TNF therapy developed about 0.08 cases of PD for every 1,000 person-years, versus 0.76 PD cases per 1,000 person-years in the group not receiving anti-TNF therapy. After adjustment for age, sex, and time at risk, anti-TNF therapy was associated with a 78% reduction in the incidence of PD among IBD patients (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.88; P = .03).

“In summary, we showed a potential clinical link between IBD and PD, supporting shared mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases,” the researchers wrote. “Moreover, our data suggest that early exposure to anti-TNF therapy may reduce the risk of PD among patients with IBD, potentially owing to a reduction in systemic inflammation. These findings should be further assessed and confirmed by other studies.”

Dr. Peter received support from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. AbbVie employed three coinvestigators. Two coinvestigators had other ties to Abbvie and Amgen.

SOURCE: Peter I et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 23. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0605.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease had about a 28% higher risk of Parkinson’s disease (PD) than that of matched controls in a large retrospective analysis of administrative health care claims.

But tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy appeared to attenuate this risk, wrote Inga Peter, PhD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and her associates. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who received TNF inhibitors were 78% less likely to develop PD than were those who did not (P = .03). “Reducing systemic inflammation in at-risk individuals may decrease the incidence of PD [Parkinson disease],” the researchers wrote. The study was published online April 23 in JAMA Neurology.

The researchers queried the Truven Health MarketScan database and the Medicare Supplemental Database for patients with IBD from 2000 through 2016. The databases included more than 170 million patients, of whom 144,018 had at least two IBD-related claims, at least 6 months of follow-up, and no baseline PD diagnosis. These patients were matched by age, sex, and treatment year with 720,090 individuals without IBD from the same databases.

A total of 1,796 patients had at least two recorded PD diagnoses and had filled at least one associated prescription, said the researchers. Based on this PD definition, patients with IBD developed PD at a 28% higher rate than that of matched controls (adjusted IRR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.44; P less than .001).

Among the IBD patients, those receiving anti-TNF therapy developed about 0.08 cases of PD for every 1,000 person-years, versus 0.76 PD cases per 1,000 person-years in the group not receiving anti-TNF therapy. After adjustment for age, sex, and time at risk, anti-TNF therapy was associated with a 78% reduction in the incidence of PD among IBD patients (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.88; P = .03).

“In summary, we showed a potential clinical link between IBD and PD, supporting shared mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases,” the researchers wrote. “Moreover, our data suggest that early exposure to anti-TNF therapy may reduce the risk of PD among patients with IBD, potentially owing to a reduction in systemic inflammation. These findings should be further assessed and confirmed by other studies.”

Dr. Peter received support from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. AbbVie employed three coinvestigators. Two coinvestigators had other ties to Abbvie and Amgen.

SOURCE: Peter I et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 23. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0605.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease had about a 28% higher risk of Parkinson’s disease (PD) than that of matched controls in a large retrospective analysis of administrative health care claims.

But tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy appeared to attenuate this risk, wrote Inga Peter, PhD, of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and her associates. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who received TNF inhibitors were 78% less likely to develop PD than were those who did not (P = .03). “Reducing systemic inflammation in at-risk individuals may decrease the incidence of PD [Parkinson disease],” the researchers wrote. The study was published online April 23 in JAMA Neurology.

The researchers queried the Truven Health MarketScan database and the Medicare Supplemental Database for patients with IBD from 2000 through 2016. The databases included more than 170 million patients, of whom 144,018 had at least two IBD-related claims, at least 6 months of follow-up, and no baseline PD diagnosis. These patients were matched by age, sex, and treatment year with 720,090 individuals without IBD from the same databases.

A total of 1,796 patients had at least two recorded PD diagnoses and had filled at least one associated prescription, said the researchers. Based on this PD definition, patients with IBD developed PD at a 28% higher rate than that of matched controls (adjusted IRR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.44; P less than .001).

Among the IBD patients, those receiving anti-TNF therapy developed about 0.08 cases of PD for every 1,000 person-years, versus 0.76 PD cases per 1,000 person-years in the group not receiving anti-TNF therapy. After adjustment for age, sex, and time at risk, anti-TNF therapy was associated with a 78% reduction in the incidence of PD among IBD patients (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.88; P = .03).

“In summary, we showed a potential clinical link between IBD and PD, supporting shared mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases,” the researchers wrote. “Moreover, our data suggest that early exposure to anti-TNF therapy may reduce the risk of PD among patients with IBD, potentially owing to a reduction in systemic inflammation. These findings should be further assessed and confirmed by other studies.”

Dr. Peter received support from the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. AbbVie employed three coinvestigators. Two coinvestigators had other ties to Abbvie and Amgen.

SOURCE: Peter I et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 23. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0605.

A meta-analysis of four large population-based studies has produced no evidence that sickle cell trait (SCT) in African Americans is associated with risk of stroke, investigators reported in JAMA Neurology.

Those findings contrast with an earlier longitudinal study that found a 1.4-fold risk of ischemic stroke in SCT carriers, the authors noted.

In their study, neither crude stroke incidence rates nor regression analysis indicated a link between SCT and stroke, said first author Hyacinth I. Hyacinth, MD, PhD, MPH, of the Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Emory University, Atlanta, and his coauthors.

“The absence of an association between SCT and risk of ischemic stroke was consistent among the cohorts, and suggests that SCT is not an independent genetic risk factor for ischemic stroke among African Americans,” Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors wrote.

The results may have implications for patient care. In particular, a more thorough evaluation of stroke in a patient with SCT may be warranted, instead of assuming that the SCT is an underlying cause of the stroke, they said.

The meta-analysis included a total of 19,464 subjects from four large, prospective, population-based studies with African American cohorts.

Results of the meta-analysis show that crude incidence of stroke was similar for individuals with SCT, at 2.9 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.0), and for those with no SCT, at 3.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 2.7-3.8).

After adjusting for stroke risk factors, the hazard ratio of stroke independently associated with SCT was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.47-1.35; P = 0.82), results further show.

It’s unclear why this study found no association between SCT and stroke when the earlier population-based study suggested a link between the two. Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors suggested differences in study methods or proportion of individuals at risk for stroke may account for the divergent findings. They also controlled for left ventricular hypertrophy, while the previous study did not.

“However, in our analysis, adjusting for left ventricular hypertrophy did not change the direction of estimate effects,” they said in the report.

Further study is needed to determine whether or not SCT may be linked to a particular type of stroke. “We were unable to test the association of SCT with ischemic stroke subtypes,” the authors noted.

Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors reported no conflicts of interest related to the study.

SOURCE: Hyacinth HI et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 23. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0571

A meta-analysis of four large population-based studies has produced no evidence that sickle cell trait (SCT) in African Americans is associated with risk of stroke, investigators reported in JAMA Neurology.

Those findings contrast with an earlier longitudinal study that found a 1.4-fold risk of ischemic stroke in SCT carriers, the authors noted.

In their study, neither crude stroke incidence rates nor regression analysis indicated a link between SCT and stroke, said first author Hyacinth I. Hyacinth, MD, PhD, MPH, of the Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Emory University, Atlanta, and his coauthors.

“The absence of an association between SCT and risk of ischemic stroke was consistent among the cohorts, and suggests that SCT is not an independent genetic risk factor for ischemic stroke among African Americans,” Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors wrote.

The results may have implications for patient care. In particular, a more thorough evaluation of stroke in a patient with SCT may be warranted, instead of assuming that the SCT is an underlying cause of the stroke, they said.

The meta-analysis included a total of 19,464 subjects from four large, prospective, population-based studies with African American cohorts.

Results of the meta-analysis show that crude incidence of stroke was similar for individuals with SCT, at 2.9 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.0), and for those with no SCT, at 3.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 2.7-3.8).

After adjusting for stroke risk factors, the hazard ratio of stroke independently associated with SCT was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.47-1.35; P = 0.82), results further show.

It’s unclear why this study found no association between SCT and stroke when the earlier population-based study suggested a link between the two. Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors suggested differences in study methods or proportion of individuals at risk for stroke may account for the divergent findings. They also controlled for left ventricular hypertrophy, while the previous study did not.

“However, in our analysis, adjusting for left ventricular hypertrophy did not change the direction of estimate effects,” they said in the report.

Further study is needed to determine whether or not SCT may be linked to a particular type of stroke. “We were unable to test the association of SCT with ischemic stroke subtypes,” the authors noted.

Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors reported no conflicts of interest related to the study.

SOURCE: Hyacinth HI et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 23. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0571

A meta-analysis of four large population-based studies has produced no evidence that sickle cell trait (SCT) in African Americans is associated with risk of stroke, investigators reported in JAMA Neurology.

Those findings contrast with an earlier longitudinal study that found a 1.4-fold risk of ischemic stroke in SCT carriers, the authors noted.

In their study, neither crude stroke incidence rates nor regression analysis indicated a link between SCT and stroke, said first author Hyacinth I. Hyacinth, MD, PhD, MPH, of the Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorder Center, Emory University, Atlanta, and his coauthors.

“The absence of an association between SCT and risk of ischemic stroke was consistent among the cohorts, and suggests that SCT is not an independent genetic risk factor for ischemic stroke among African Americans,” Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors wrote.

The results may have implications for patient care. In particular, a more thorough evaluation of stroke in a patient with SCT may be warranted, instead of assuming that the SCT is an underlying cause of the stroke, they said.

The meta-analysis included a total of 19,464 subjects from four large, prospective, population-based studies with African American cohorts.

Results of the meta-analysis show that crude incidence of stroke was similar for individuals with SCT, at 2.9 per 1,000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 2.2-4.0), and for those with no SCT, at 3.2 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 2.7-3.8).

After adjusting for stroke risk factors, the hazard ratio of stroke independently associated with SCT was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.47-1.35; P = 0.82), results further show.

It’s unclear why this study found no association between SCT and stroke when the earlier population-based study suggested a link between the two. Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors suggested differences in study methods or proportion of individuals at risk for stroke may account for the divergent findings. They also controlled for left ventricular hypertrophy, while the previous study did not.

“However, in our analysis, adjusting for left ventricular hypertrophy did not change the direction of estimate effects,” they said in the report.

Further study is needed to determine whether or not SCT may be linked to a particular type of stroke. “We were unable to test the association of SCT with ischemic stroke subtypes,” the authors noted.

Dr. Hyacinth and his coauthors reported no conflicts of interest related to the study.

SOURCE: Hyacinth HI et al. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Apr 23. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0571

LOS ANGELES—Treatment for as long as four years with adjunctive perampanel is safe and effective for adolescents with secondarily generalized seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, according to a post hoc study presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “These post hoc results are encouraging, given the refractory nature of these seizure types,” said the investigators.

Perampanel has regulatory approval for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures, and for the adjunctive treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in patients age 12 and younger with epilepsy. Phase II and III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials indicated that adjunctive perampanel (at doses of 12 mg/day or less) was effective and tolerable in patients with these types of seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. The participants who completed these studies were eligible to enter one of four open-label extension studies.

Jesus Eric Piña-Garza, MD, a pediatric neurologist at the Children’s Hospital at TriStar Centennial in Nashville, and colleagues used data from these open-label extension studies to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients from ages 12 to 17 with secondarily generalized seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

The extension studies incorporated a blinded conversion period that lasted for six to 16 weeks, during which perampanel dose was optimized (at 12 mg/day or less), and a maintenance phase that lasted for 27 to 256 weeks. Total drug exposure was as long as five years. All patients received perampanel during these studies. Efficacy and safety assessments, which were performed for as long as four years, included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days and 50% and 75% responder and seizure-freedom rates. Investigators also monitored treatment-emergent adverse events.

The investigators included 129 adolescent patients in the safety analysis set, including 109 with secondarily generalized seizures and 19 with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. During the first year, median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days were 62.8% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 84.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. During year four, median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days were 73.2% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 100.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The 50% responder rates were 56.9% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 63.2% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in year one, and 65.2% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 100.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in year four.

For each seizure type, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was highest during the first year of perampanel exposure. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis.

The study was supported by Eisai.

LOS ANGELES—Treatment for as long as four years with adjunctive perampanel is safe and effective for adolescents with secondarily generalized seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, according to a post hoc study presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “These post hoc results are encouraging, given the refractory nature of these seizure types,” said the investigators.

Perampanel has regulatory approval for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures, and for the adjunctive treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in patients age 12 and younger with epilepsy. Phase II and III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials indicated that adjunctive perampanel (at doses of 12 mg/day or less) was effective and tolerable in patients with these types of seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. The participants who completed these studies were eligible to enter one of four open-label extension studies.

Jesus Eric Piña-Garza, MD, a pediatric neurologist at the Children’s Hospital at TriStar Centennial in Nashville, and colleagues used data from these open-label extension studies to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients from ages 12 to 17 with secondarily generalized seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

The extension studies incorporated a blinded conversion period that lasted for six to 16 weeks, during which perampanel dose was optimized (at 12 mg/day or less), and a maintenance phase that lasted for 27 to 256 weeks. Total drug exposure was as long as five years. All patients received perampanel during these studies. Efficacy and safety assessments, which were performed for as long as four years, included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days and 50% and 75% responder and seizure-freedom rates. Investigators also monitored treatment-emergent adverse events.

The investigators included 129 adolescent patients in the safety analysis set, including 109 with secondarily generalized seizures and 19 with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. During the first year, median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days were 62.8% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 84.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. During year four, median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days were 73.2% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 100.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The 50% responder rates were 56.9% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 63.2% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in year one, and 65.2% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 100.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in year four.

For each seizure type, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was highest during the first year of perampanel exposure. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis.

The study was supported by Eisai.

LOS ANGELES—Treatment for as long as four years with adjunctive perampanel is safe and effective for adolescents with secondarily generalized seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, according to a post hoc study presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. “These post hoc results are encouraging, given the refractory nature of these seizure types,” said the investigators.

Perampanel has regulatory approval for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures, and for the adjunctive treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in patients age 12 and younger with epilepsy. Phase II and III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials indicated that adjunctive perampanel (at doses of 12 mg/day or less) was effective and tolerable in patients with these types of seizures in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. The participants who completed these studies were eligible to enter one of four open-label extension studies.

Jesus Eric Piña-Garza, MD, a pediatric neurologist at the Children’s Hospital at TriStar Centennial in Nashville, and colleagues used data from these open-label extension studies to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of adjunctive perampanel in patients from ages 12 to 17 with secondarily generalized seizures or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

The extension studies incorporated a blinded conversion period that lasted for six to 16 weeks, during which perampanel dose was optimized (at 12 mg/day or less), and a maintenance phase that lasted for 27 to 256 weeks. Total drug exposure was as long as five years. All patients received perampanel during these studies. Efficacy and safety assessments, which were performed for as long as four years, included median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days and 50% and 75% responder and seizure-freedom rates. Investigators also monitored treatment-emergent adverse events.

The investigators included 129 adolescent patients in the safety analysis set, including 109 with secondarily generalized seizures and 19 with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. During the first year, median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days were 62.8% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 84.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. During year four, median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days were 73.2% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 100.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The 50% responder rates were 56.9% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 63.2% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in year one, and 65.2% for patients with secondarily generalized seizures and 100.0% for patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in year four.

For each seizure type, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was highest during the first year of perampanel exposure. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis.

The study was supported by Eisai.

A second interim analysis of data from the phase 3 ADAPT trial for the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma has led to discontinuation of the trial.

In ADAPT, 462 patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were randomized 2:1 between combination treatment with Rocapuldencel-T and sunitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy, after undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy.

In February 2017, the trial’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee had reviewed the data and concluded that the trial was unlikely to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in median overall survival in the combination arm and recommended halting the trial. However, the principal investigators and the company, Argos Therapeutics, considered the data too immature to observe the delayed effects associated with immunotherapy and decided to continue the trial. They submitted a protocol amendment to the Food and Drug Administration adding additional co-primary endpoints, and in April of last year, met with the Food and Drug Administration, which accepted the amendment and agreed to continuation of the trial, according to a company press release issued in November.

In the latest interim analysis, which was conducted following an additional 51 deaths, median overall survival for the intent-to-treat patient population was 28.2 months for the combination arm (95% confidence interval, 23.4, 35.2) compared with 31.2 months (95% CI, 23.0, 44.5) for the control arm; this was one of four new co-primary endpoints. The hazard ratio was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85, 1.42).

Other co-primary endpoints that were evaluated, including overall survival for the patients who remained alive at the time of the February 2017 interim analysis and overall survival for all patients for whom at least 12 months of follow-up was available, did not demonstrate a favorable result, Argos Therapeutics said in a recent press release.

Rocapuldencel-T “consists of autologous dendritic cells programmed with amplified RNA from a patient’s primary tumor” and is “designed to overcome immunosuppression and induce broadly reactive, long-lasting anti-tumor memory T cells” according to the early interim analysis presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2017. The drug is also being evaluated in non–small cell lung cancer and bladder cancer.

[email protected]

A second interim analysis of data from the phase 3 ADAPT trial for the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma has led to discontinuation of the trial.

In ADAPT, 462 patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were randomized 2:1 between combination treatment with Rocapuldencel-T and sunitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy, after undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy.

In February 2017, the trial’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee had reviewed the data and concluded that the trial was unlikely to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in median overall survival in the combination arm and recommended halting the trial. However, the principal investigators and the company, Argos Therapeutics, considered the data too immature to observe the delayed effects associated with immunotherapy and decided to continue the trial. They submitted a protocol amendment to the Food and Drug Administration adding additional co-primary endpoints, and in April of last year, met with the Food and Drug Administration, which accepted the amendment and agreed to continuation of the trial, according to a company press release issued in November.

In the latest interim analysis, which was conducted following an additional 51 deaths, median overall survival for the intent-to-treat patient population was 28.2 months for the combination arm (95% confidence interval, 23.4, 35.2) compared with 31.2 months (95% CI, 23.0, 44.5) for the control arm; this was one of four new co-primary endpoints. The hazard ratio was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85, 1.42).

Other co-primary endpoints that were evaluated, including overall survival for the patients who remained alive at the time of the February 2017 interim analysis and overall survival for all patients for whom at least 12 months of follow-up was available, did not demonstrate a favorable result, Argos Therapeutics said in a recent press release.

Rocapuldencel-T “consists of autologous dendritic cells programmed with amplified RNA from a patient’s primary tumor” and is “designed to overcome immunosuppression and induce broadly reactive, long-lasting anti-tumor memory T cells” according to the early interim analysis presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2017. The drug is also being evaluated in non–small cell lung cancer and bladder cancer.

[email protected]

A second interim analysis of data from the phase 3 ADAPT trial for the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma has led to discontinuation of the trial.

In ADAPT, 462 patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were randomized 2:1 between combination treatment with Rocapuldencel-T and sunitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy, after undergoing cytoreductive nephrectomy.

In February 2017, the trial’s Independent Data Monitoring Committee had reviewed the data and concluded that the trial was unlikely to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in median overall survival in the combination arm and recommended halting the trial. However, the principal investigators and the company, Argos Therapeutics, considered the data too immature to observe the delayed effects associated with immunotherapy and decided to continue the trial. They submitted a protocol amendment to the Food and Drug Administration adding additional co-primary endpoints, and in April of last year, met with the Food and Drug Administration, which accepted the amendment and agreed to continuation of the trial, according to a company press release issued in November.

In the latest interim analysis, which was conducted following an additional 51 deaths, median overall survival for the intent-to-treat patient population was 28.2 months for the combination arm (95% confidence interval, 23.4, 35.2) compared with 31.2 months (95% CI, 23.0, 44.5) for the control arm; this was one of four new co-primary endpoints. The hazard ratio was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85, 1.42).

Other co-primary endpoints that were evaluated, including overall survival for the patients who remained alive at the time of the February 2017 interim analysis and overall survival for all patients for whom at least 12 months of follow-up was available, did not demonstrate a favorable result, Argos Therapeutics said in a recent press release.

Rocapuldencel-T “consists of autologous dendritic cells programmed with amplified RNA from a patient’s primary tumor” and is “designed to overcome immunosuppression and induce broadly reactive, long-lasting anti-tumor memory T cells” according to the early interim analysis presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2017. The drug is also being evaluated in non–small cell lung cancer and bladder cancer.

[email protected]

WASHINGTON – Over one-third of 28 outcomes identified to be important to Sjogren’s patients with dry eye are not commonly found in existing research, according to a study presented at the International Symposium on Sjogren’s Syndrome.

With dry eye found in over 85% of Sjogren’s patients, pinpointing important outcomes accurately can help researchers and physicians focus their efforts and be more cost effective when developing clinical trials, systematic reviews , practice guidelines, and evidence-based health care, according to presenter Ian J. Saldanha, MBBS, MPH, PhD, of the department of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.

“When designing clinical trials, if you are trying to incorporate the views of patients, this can help more accurately depict what you should be measuring and in what time frame,“ Dr. Saldanha said to attendees. This can be important as agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration have absolved to be more committed to bringing the patient perspective to drug development, according to Dr. Saldanha.

Investigators surveyed 420 subscribers to KeratoScoop, a news source that specifically reports on dry eye, using a two-round survey process with participants ranking outcomes from 0 to 10, 0 being the least important and 10 being the most.

The majority of the patients were white American women, aged 50 years and older.

To start, Dr. Saldanha and his fellow investigators identified 109 outcomes commonly found in existing research. Of these, 28 were identified as important to survey takers.

The investigators noted that 39% of the outcomes identified were symptoms, compared with 25% for clinical testing, 14% related to quality of life, and the remainder split evenly between lab measures, safety, and others.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Saldanha I et al. International Symposium on Sjogren’s Syndrome.

WASHINGTON – Over one-third of 28 outcomes identified to be important to Sjogren’s patients with dry eye are not commonly found in existing research, according to a study presented at the International Symposium on Sjogren’s Syndrome.

With dry eye found in over 85% of Sjogren’s patients, pinpointing important outcomes accurately can help researchers and physicians focus their efforts and be more cost effective when developing clinical trials, systematic reviews , practice guidelines, and evidence-based health care, according to presenter Ian J. Saldanha, MBBS, MPH, PhD, of the department of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.

“When designing clinical trials, if you are trying to incorporate the views of patients, this can help more accurately depict what you should be measuring and in what time frame,“ Dr. Saldanha said to attendees. This can be important as agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration have absolved to be more committed to bringing the patient perspective to drug development, according to Dr. Saldanha.

Investigators surveyed 420 subscribers to KeratoScoop, a news source that specifically reports on dry eye, using a two-round survey process with participants ranking outcomes from 0 to 10, 0 being the least important and 10 being the most.

The majority of the patients were white American women, aged 50 years and older.

To start, Dr. Saldanha and his fellow investigators identified 109 outcomes commonly found in existing research. Of these, 28 were identified as important to survey takers.

The investigators noted that 39% of the outcomes identified were symptoms, compared with 25% for clinical testing, 14% related to quality of life, and the remainder split evenly between lab measures, safety, and others.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Saldanha I et al. International Symposium on Sjogren’s Syndrome.

WASHINGTON – Over one-third of 28 outcomes identified to be important to Sjogren’s patients with dry eye are not commonly found in existing research, according to a study presented at the International Symposium on Sjogren’s Syndrome.

With dry eye found in over 85% of Sjogren’s patients, pinpointing important outcomes accurately can help researchers and physicians focus their efforts and be more cost effective when developing clinical trials, systematic reviews , practice guidelines, and evidence-based health care, according to presenter Ian J. Saldanha, MBBS, MPH, PhD, of the department of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore.

“When designing clinical trials, if you are trying to incorporate the views of patients, this can help more accurately depict what you should be measuring and in what time frame,“ Dr. Saldanha said to attendees. This can be important as agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration have absolved to be more committed to bringing the patient perspective to drug development, according to Dr. Saldanha.

Investigators surveyed 420 subscribers to KeratoScoop, a news source that specifically reports on dry eye, using a two-round survey process with participants ranking outcomes from 0 to 10, 0 being the least important and 10 being the most.

The majority of the patients were white American women, aged 50 years and older.

To start, Dr. Saldanha and his fellow investigators identified 109 outcomes commonly found in existing research. Of these, 28 were identified as important to survey takers.

The investigators noted that 39% of the outcomes identified were symptoms, compared with 25% for clinical testing, 14% related to quality of life, and the remainder split evenly between lab measures, safety, and others.

[email protected]

SOURCE: Saldanha I et al. International Symposium on Sjogren’s Syndrome.

For more information about upcoming events and award deadlines, please visit http://www.gastro.org/education and http://www.gastro.org/research-funding.

June 2-5, 2018
DIGESTIVE DISEASE WEEK^® (DDW) 2018 – WASHINGTON, DC
DDW^® is the premier meeting for the GI professional. Every year, it attracts approximately 15,000 physicians, researchers, and academics from around the world who desire to stay up to date in the field.

AGA Trainee and Early-Career GI Sessions

Join your colleagues at special sessions to meet the unique needs of physicians who are new to the field. Participants will learn about all aspects of starting a career in clinical practice or research, have the opportunity to network with mentors and peers, and review board material.

• June 2, 8:15 a.m.–5:30 p.m.; June 3, 8:30 a.m.–12:35 p.m.
  AGA Postgraduate Course: From Abstract to Reality
  Attend this multi-topic course to get practical, useful information to push your practice to the next level. The 2018 course will provide a comprehensive look at the latest medical, surgical, and technological advances over the past 12 months that aim to keep you up to date in a field that is rapidly changing. Each presenter will turn abstract ideas into concrete action items that you can immediately implement in your practice. AGA member trainees and early-career GIs receive discounted pricing for this course.
• June 3, 4–5:30 p.m.
  Difficult Conversations: Navigating People, Negotiations, Promotions, and Complications
  During this session, attendees will obtain effective negotiation techniques and learn how to navigate difficult situations in clinical and research environments.
• June 3, 6-7 p.m.
  AGA Early Career Networking Hour
  This event is open to all DDW trainee and early career GI attendees and provides a casual atmosphere to bond with your peers. Complimentary food and drinks will be available. 
• June 4, 4–5:30 p.m.
  Advancing Clinical Practice: Gastroenterology Fellow–Directed Quality-Improvement Projects
  This trainee-focused session will showcase selected abstracts from GI fellows based on quality improvement with a state-of-the-art lecture. Attendees will be provided with information that defines practical approaches to quality improvement from start to finish. A limited supply of coffee and tea will be provided during the session.
• June 5, 1:30–5:30 p.m.
  Board Review Course
  This session, designed using content from DDSEP^® 8, serves as a primer for third-year fellows preparing for the board exam as well as a review course for others wanting to test their knowledge. Session attendees will receive a $50 coupon to use at the AGA Store at DDW to purchase DDSEP 8.

UPCOMING EVENTS
 

June 4-8, 2018
Exosomes/Microvesicles: Heterogeneity, Biogenesis, Function, and Therapeutic Developments (E2)
Deepen your understanding of the structural and functional complexity of extracellular vesicles, their biogenesis and function in health and disease, cargo enrichment, potential as ideal biomarkers, and breakthroughs in their use as therapeutic targets/agents.
Breckenridge, CO

June 13-14; Aug. 15-16; Sept. 19-20; Oct. 10-11, 2018
Two-Day, In-Depth Coding and Billing Seminar
Become a certified GI coder with a two-day, in-depth training course provided by McVey Associates, Inc.
Nashville, TN (6/13-6/14); Baltimore, MD (8/15-8/16); Atlanta, GA (9/19-9/20); Las Vegas, NV (10/10-10/11)

Aug. 10–12, 2018
Principles of GI for the NP and PA
Hear from the experts as they provide you with critical updates on treating and managing patients with a variety of GI disorders.
Chicago, IL

Aug. 18-19, 2018
James W. Freston Conference: Obesity and Metabolic Disease – Integrating New Paradigms in Pathophysiology to Advance Treatment
Collaborate with researchers and clinicians to help advance obesity treatment and enhance the continuum of obesity care.
Arlington, VA

Feb. 7-9, 2019
Crohn’s & Colitis Congress™ (A Partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and American Gastroenterological Association)
Expand your knowledge, network with IBD leaders, spark innovative research and get inspired to improve patient care.
Las Vegas, NV

For more information about upcoming events and award deadlines, please visit http://www.gastro.org/education and http://www.gastro.org/research-funding.

June 2-5, 2018
DIGESTIVE DISEASE WEEK^® (DDW) 2018 – WASHINGTON, DC
DDW^® is the premier meeting for the GI professional. Every year, it attracts approximately 15,000 physicians, researchers, and academics from around the world who desire to stay up to date in the field.

AGA Trainee and Early-Career GI Sessions

Join your colleagues at special sessions to meet the unique needs of physicians who are new to the field. Participants will learn about all aspects of starting a career in clinical practice or research, have the opportunity to network with mentors and peers, and review board material.

• June 2, 8:15 a.m.–5:30 p.m.; June 3, 8:30 a.m.–12:35 p.m.
  AGA Postgraduate Course: From Abstract to Reality
  Attend this multi-topic course to get practical, useful information to push your practice to the next level. The 2018 course will provide a comprehensive look at the latest medical, surgical, and technological advances over the past 12 months that aim to keep you up to date in a field that is rapidly changing. Each presenter will turn abstract ideas into concrete action items that you can immediately implement in your practice. AGA member trainees and early-career GIs receive discounted pricing for this course.
• June 3, 4–5:30 p.m.
  Difficult Conversations: Navigating People, Negotiations, Promotions, and Complications
  During this session, attendees will obtain effective negotiation techniques and learn how to navigate difficult situations in clinical and research environments.
• June 3, 6-7 p.m.
  AGA Early Career Networking Hour
  This event is open to all DDW trainee and early career GI attendees and provides a casual atmosphere to bond with your peers. Complimentary food and drinks will be available. 
• June 4, 4–5:30 p.m.
  Advancing Clinical Practice: Gastroenterology Fellow–Directed Quality-Improvement Projects
  This trainee-focused session will showcase selected abstracts from GI fellows based on quality improvement with a state-of-the-art lecture. Attendees will be provided with information that defines practical approaches to quality improvement from start to finish. A limited supply of coffee and tea will be provided during the session.
• June 5, 1:30–5:30 p.m.
  Board Review Course
  This session, designed using content from DDSEP^® 8, serves as a primer for third-year fellows preparing for the board exam as well as a review course for others wanting to test their knowledge. Session attendees will receive a $50 coupon to use at the AGA Store at DDW to purchase DDSEP 8.

UPCOMING EVENTS
 

June 4-8, 2018
Exosomes/Microvesicles: Heterogeneity, Biogenesis, Function, and Therapeutic Developments (E2)
Deepen your understanding of the structural and functional complexity of extracellular vesicles, their biogenesis and function in health and disease, cargo enrichment, potential as ideal biomarkers, and breakthroughs in their use as therapeutic targets/agents.
Breckenridge, CO

June 13-14; Aug. 15-16; Sept. 19-20; Oct. 10-11, 2018
Two-Day, In-Depth Coding and Billing Seminar
Become a certified GI coder with a two-day, in-depth training course provided by McVey Associates, Inc.
Nashville, TN (6/13-6/14); Baltimore, MD (8/15-8/16); Atlanta, GA (9/19-9/20); Las Vegas, NV (10/10-10/11)

Aug. 10–12, 2018
Principles of GI for the NP and PA
Hear from the experts as they provide you with critical updates on treating and managing patients with a variety of GI disorders.
Chicago, IL

Aug. 18-19, 2018
James W. Freston Conference: Obesity and Metabolic Disease – Integrating New Paradigms in Pathophysiology to Advance Treatment
Collaborate with researchers and clinicians to help advance obesity treatment and enhance the continuum of obesity care.
Arlington, VA

Feb. 7-9, 2019
Crohn’s & Colitis Congress™ (A Partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and American Gastroenterological Association)
Expand your knowledge, network with IBD leaders, spark innovative research and get inspired to improve patient care.
Las Vegas, NV

For more information about upcoming events and award deadlines, please visit http://www.gastro.org/education and http://www.gastro.org/research-funding.

June 2-5, 2018
DIGESTIVE DISEASE WEEK^® (DDW) 2018 – WASHINGTON, DC
DDW^® is the premier meeting for the GI professional. Every year, it attracts approximately 15,000 physicians, researchers, and academics from around the world who desire to stay up to date in the field.

AGA Trainee and Early-Career GI Sessions

Join your colleagues at special sessions to meet the unique needs of physicians who are new to the field. Participants will learn about all aspects of starting a career in clinical practice or research, have the opportunity to network with mentors and peers, and review board material.

• June 2, 8:15 a.m.–5:30 p.m.; June 3, 8:30 a.m.–12:35 p.m.
  AGA Postgraduate Course: From Abstract to Reality
  Attend this multi-topic course to get practical, useful information to push your practice to the next level. The 2018 course will provide a comprehensive look at the latest medical, surgical, and technological advances over the past 12 months that aim to keep you up to date in a field that is rapidly changing. Each presenter will turn abstract ideas into concrete action items that you can immediately implement in your practice. AGA member trainees and early-career GIs receive discounted pricing for this course.
• June 3, 4–5:30 p.m.
  Difficult Conversations: Navigating People, Negotiations, Promotions, and Complications
  During this session, attendees will obtain effective negotiation techniques and learn how to navigate difficult situations in clinical and research environments.
• June 3, 6-7 p.m.
  AGA Early Career Networking Hour
  This event is open to all DDW trainee and early career GI attendees and provides a casual atmosphere to bond with your peers. Complimentary food and drinks will be available. 
• June 4, 4–5:30 p.m.
  Advancing Clinical Practice: Gastroenterology Fellow–Directed Quality-Improvement Projects
  This trainee-focused session will showcase selected abstracts from GI fellows based on quality improvement with a state-of-the-art lecture. Attendees will be provided with information that defines practical approaches to quality improvement from start to finish. A limited supply of coffee and tea will be provided during the session.
• June 5, 1:30–5:30 p.m.
  Board Review Course
  This session, designed using content from DDSEP^® 8, serves as a primer for third-year fellows preparing for the board exam as well as a review course for others wanting to test their knowledge. Session attendees will receive a $50 coupon to use at the AGA Store at DDW to purchase DDSEP 8.

UPCOMING EVENTS
 

June 4-8, 2018
Exosomes/Microvesicles: Heterogeneity, Biogenesis, Function, and Therapeutic Developments (E2)
Deepen your understanding of the structural and functional complexity of extracellular vesicles, their biogenesis and function in health and disease, cargo enrichment, potential as ideal biomarkers, and breakthroughs in their use as therapeutic targets/agents.
Breckenridge, CO

June 13-14; Aug. 15-16; Sept. 19-20; Oct. 10-11, 2018
Two-Day, In-Depth Coding and Billing Seminar
Become a certified GI coder with a two-day, in-depth training course provided by McVey Associates, Inc.
Nashville, TN (6/13-6/14); Baltimore, MD (8/15-8/16); Atlanta, GA (9/19-9/20); Las Vegas, NV (10/10-10/11)

Aug. 10–12, 2018
Principles of GI for the NP and PA
Hear from the experts as they provide you with critical updates on treating and managing patients with a variety of GI disorders.
Chicago, IL

Aug. 18-19, 2018
James W. Freston Conference: Obesity and Metabolic Disease – Integrating New Paradigms in Pathophysiology to Advance Treatment
Collaborate with researchers and clinicians to help advance obesity treatment and enhance the continuum of obesity care.
Arlington, VA

Feb. 7-9, 2019
Crohn’s & Colitis Congress™ (A Partnership of the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation and American Gastroenterological Association)
Expand your knowledge, network with IBD leaders, spark innovative research and get inspired to improve patient care.
Las Vegas, NV

Reshaping medicine’s mindset about gender roles, when to rechallenge for statin-associated muscle symptoms, how zip code (not gene code) influences health, and surgeries are driving hospital costs.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.

Reshaping medicine’s mindset about gender roles, when to rechallenge for statin-associated muscle symptoms, how zip code (not gene code) influences health, and surgeries are driving hospital costs.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.

Reshaping medicine’s mindset about gender roles, when to rechallenge for statin-associated muscle symptoms, how zip code (not gene code) influences health, and surgeries are driving hospital costs.

Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.

LOS ANGELES – Results from the first-in-human trial of the investigational antisense oligonucleotide therapy IONIS-HTTRx showed strong dose-dependent reductions in the toxic huntingtin protein in Huntington’s disease patients’ cerebrospinal fluid when compared with placebo.

An exploratory analysis also showed signals of clinical improvement among patients receiving the therapy, the study’s lead author, Sarah Tabrizi, MD, PhD, of University College London, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The findings represent a potential breakthrough in the way Huntington’s – and possibly other neurodegenerative diseases – are treated, said Dr. Tabrizi of University College London. The intrathecally-delivered drug binds to mutant huntingtin protein mRNA to reduce the level of the toxic protein being made.

In the phase 1/2a trial, Dr. Tabrizi and her colleagues enrolled 46 patients with early-stage Huntington’s disease and randomized them to four doses of IONIS-HTTRx or placebo. Patients received four monthly injections of the study drug into the cerebrospinal fluid followed by a 4-month untreated follow-up period. IONIS-HTTRx was delivered in five ascending-dose cohorts.

IONIS-HTTRx was safe and well tolerated and all patients completed the study, Dr. Tabrizi reported. “Our results show that we had significant lowering of the toxic mutant huntingtin protein in the spinal fluid of the patients,” she said, noting that patients receiving the highest doses saw 40%-60% lowering of the protein, which preclinical work suggests correlates to reductions of the protein in the brain.

Dr. Tabrizi stressed that the main outcome measures in the study were reduction of the mutant protein in the CSF and safety and tolerance of the study drug. The investigators did not expect to see clinical measures to change in such a short, small study, she said.

“But then when we looked more carefully at the data with exploratory analysis we found a link between lowering of CSF mutant huntingtin and improvement in total motor score, which is a measure of neurological function, and also, improvement in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test.”

The clinical results are exploratory and require confirmation in larger studies, Dr. Tabrizi stressed.

The study was supported by Ionis Pharmaceuticals. Roche will develop the drug in further clinical trials.

SOURCE: Tabrizi S et al. AAN 2018 abstract CT.002.

LOS ANGELES – Results from the first-in-human trial of the investigational antisense oligonucleotide therapy IONIS-HTTRx showed strong dose-dependent reductions in the toxic huntingtin protein in Huntington’s disease patients’ cerebrospinal fluid when compared with placebo.

An exploratory analysis also showed signals of clinical improvement among patients receiving the therapy, the study’s lead author, Sarah Tabrizi, MD, PhD, of University College London, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The findings represent a potential breakthrough in the way Huntington’s – and possibly other neurodegenerative diseases – are treated, said Dr. Tabrizi of University College London. The intrathecally-delivered drug binds to mutant huntingtin protein mRNA to reduce the level of the toxic protein being made.

In the phase 1/2a trial, Dr. Tabrizi and her colleagues enrolled 46 patients with early-stage Huntington’s disease and randomized them to four doses of IONIS-HTTRx or placebo. Patients received four monthly injections of the study drug into the cerebrospinal fluid followed by a 4-month untreated follow-up period. IONIS-HTTRx was delivered in five ascending-dose cohorts.

IONIS-HTTRx was safe and well tolerated and all patients completed the study, Dr. Tabrizi reported. “Our results show that we had significant lowering of the toxic mutant huntingtin protein in the spinal fluid of the patients,” she said, noting that patients receiving the highest doses saw 40%-60% lowering of the protein, which preclinical work suggests correlates to reductions of the protein in the brain.

Dr. Tabrizi stressed that the main outcome measures in the study were reduction of the mutant protein in the CSF and safety and tolerance of the study drug. The investigators did not expect to see clinical measures to change in such a short, small study, she said.

“But then when we looked more carefully at the data with exploratory analysis we found a link between lowering of CSF mutant huntingtin and improvement in total motor score, which is a measure of neurological function, and also, improvement in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test.”

The clinical results are exploratory and require confirmation in larger studies, Dr. Tabrizi stressed.

The study was supported by Ionis Pharmaceuticals. Roche will develop the drug in further clinical trials.

SOURCE: Tabrizi S et al. AAN 2018 abstract CT.002.

LOS ANGELES – Results from the first-in-human trial of the investigational antisense oligonucleotide therapy IONIS-HTTRx showed strong dose-dependent reductions in the toxic huntingtin protein in Huntington’s disease patients’ cerebrospinal fluid when compared with placebo.

An exploratory analysis also showed signals of clinical improvement among patients receiving the therapy, the study’s lead author, Sarah Tabrizi, MD, PhD, of University College London, reported at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

The findings represent a potential breakthrough in the way Huntington’s – and possibly other neurodegenerative diseases – are treated, said Dr. Tabrizi of University College London. The intrathecally-delivered drug binds to mutant huntingtin protein mRNA to reduce the level of the toxic protein being made.

In the phase 1/2a trial, Dr. Tabrizi and her colleagues enrolled 46 patients with early-stage Huntington’s disease and randomized them to four doses of IONIS-HTTRx or placebo. Patients received four monthly injections of the study drug into the cerebrospinal fluid followed by a 4-month untreated follow-up period. IONIS-HTTRx was delivered in five ascending-dose cohorts.

IONIS-HTTRx was safe and well tolerated and all patients completed the study, Dr. Tabrizi reported. “Our results show that we had significant lowering of the toxic mutant huntingtin protein in the spinal fluid of the patients,” she said, noting that patients receiving the highest doses saw 40%-60% lowering of the protein, which preclinical work suggests correlates to reductions of the protein in the brain.

Dr. Tabrizi stressed that the main outcome measures in the study were reduction of the mutant protein in the CSF and safety and tolerance of the study drug. The investigators did not expect to see clinical measures to change in such a short, small study, she said.

“But then when we looked more carefully at the data with exploratory analysis we found a link between lowering of CSF mutant huntingtin and improvement in total motor score, which is a measure of neurological function, and also, improvement in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test.”

The clinical results are exploratory and require confirmation in larger studies, Dr. Tabrizi stressed.

The study was supported by Ionis Pharmaceuticals. Roche will develop the drug in further clinical trials.

SOURCE: Tabrizi S et al. AAN 2018 abstract CT.002.

LOS ANGELES – The investigational oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) blocker ubrogepant proved superior to placebo in treating a single, acute, moderate to severe migraine attack in the phase 3 ACHIEVE I trial.

Blocking the function of CGRP when it is pathologically released during a migraine attack is the mechanism of a bevy of antagonists under development for treating migraine, and the ACHIEVE I trial results are the first to be reported from a phase 3 trial of an oral small molecule to treat single migraine attacks rather than prevent attacks with monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor, according to the lead author of ACHIEVE I, Joel M. Trugman, MD, director of clinical development for Allergan.

Dr. Trugman and his colleagues recruited 1,672 adult patients (88% female, mean age 41) with a history of migraine with or without aura, and randomized them to placebo, ubrogepant 50 mg, or ubrogepant 100 mg. Patients were instructed to treat a single migraine attack of moderate to severe pain intensity and record symptoms, such as pain, light sensitivity, and sound sensitivity, before and after taking the medication.

“The paradigm for this type of trial is to treat a single, well characterized migraine attack in a large population of patients,” Dr. Trugman said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

At 2 hours after dosing, the percentage of ubrogepant-treated patients achieving freedom from pain was significantly greater than the percentage of those treated with placebo (50 mg: 19.2%, P = .0023; 100 mg: 21.2%, P = .0003; placebo: 11.8%).

The percentage of ubrogepant-treated patients achieving absence of their most bothersome symptom was also significantly greater than that of placebo (50 mg: 38.6%, P = .0023; 100 mg: 37.7%, P = .0023; placebo: 27.8%).

Adverse events in the ubrogepant groups were similar to those of placebo, the most reported to be nausea, somnolence, and dry mouth.

Several authors are employees of Allergan, which sponsored the study.

SOURCE: Trugman J et al. AAN 2018 emerging science abstract 008.

LOS ANGELES – The investigational oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) blocker ubrogepant proved superior to placebo in treating a single, acute, moderate to severe migraine attack in the phase 3 ACHIEVE I trial.

Blocking the function of CGRP when it is pathologically released during a migraine attack is the mechanism of a bevy of antagonists under development for treating migraine, and the ACHIEVE I trial results are the first to be reported from a phase 3 trial of an oral small molecule to treat single migraine attacks rather than prevent attacks with monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor, according to the lead author of ACHIEVE I, Joel M. Trugman, MD, director of clinical development for Allergan.

Dr. Trugman and his colleagues recruited 1,672 adult patients (88% female, mean age 41) with a history of migraine with or without aura, and randomized them to placebo, ubrogepant 50 mg, or ubrogepant 100 mg. Patients were instructed to treat a single migraine attack of moderate to severe pain intensity and record symptoms, such as pain, light sensitivity, and sound sensitivity, before and after taking the medication.

“The paradigm for this type of trial is to treat a single, well characterized migraine attack in a large population of patients,” Dr. Trugman said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

At 2 hours after dosing, the percentage of ubrogepant-treated patients achieving freedom from pain was significantly greater than the percentage of those treated with placebo (50 mg: 19.2%, P = .0023; 100 mg: 21.2%, P = .0003; placebo: 11.8%).

The percentage of ubrogepant-treated patients achieving absence of their most bothersome symptom was also significantly greater than that of placebo (50 mg: 38.6%, P = .0023; 100 mg: 37.7%, P = .0023; placebo: 27.8%).

Adverse events in the ubrogepant groups were similar to those of placebo, the most reported to be nausea, somnolence, and dry mouth.

Several authors are employees of Allergan, which sponsored the study.

SOURCE: Trugman J et al. AAN 2018 emerging science abstract 008.

LOS ANGELES – The investigational oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) blocker ubrogepant proved superior to placebo in treating a single, acute, moderate to severe migraine attack in the phase 3 ACHIEVE I trial.

Blocking the function of CGRP when it is pathologically released during a migraine attack is the mechanism of a bevy of antagonists under development for treating migraine, and the ACHIEVE I trial results are the first to be reported from a phase 3 trial of an oral small molecule to treat single migraine attacks rather than prevent attacks with monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or its receptor, according to the lead author of ACHIEVE I, Joel M. Trugman, MD, director of clinical development for Allergan.

Dr. Trugman and his colleagues recruited 1,672 adult patients (88% female, mean age 41) with a history of migraine with or without aura, and randomized them to placebo, ubrogepant 50 mg, or ubrogepant 100 mg. Patients were instructed to treat a single migraine attack of moderate to severe pain intensity and record symptoms, such as pain, light sensitivity, and sound sensitivity, before and after taking the medication.

“The paradigm for this type of trial is to treat a single, well characterized migraine attack in a large population of patients,” Dr. Trugman said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology.

At 2 hours after dosing, the percentage of ubrogepant-treated patients achieving freedom from pain was significantly greater than the percentage of those treated with placebo (50 mg: 19.2%, P = .0023; 100 mg: 21.2%, P = .0003; placebo: 11.8%).

The percentage of ubrogepant-treated patients achieving absence of their most bothersome symptom was also significantly greater than that of placebo (50 mg: 38.6%, P = .0023; 100 mg: 37.7%, P = .0023; placebo: 27.8%).

Adverse events in the ubrogepant groups were similar to those of placebo, the most reported to be nausea, somnolence, and dry mouth.

Several authors are employees of Allergan, which sponsored the study.

SOURCE: Trugman J et al. AAN 2018 emerging science abstract 008.