SAN FRANCISCO – New York University researchers have found a ninefold increase of the bacterium Ruminococcus gnavus in the intestines of particularly ill lupus patients.

Not only that, but those patients also had highly elevated antibodies to an endotoxin-like antigen released by one particular R. gnavus strain.

That antigen is “very proinflammatory, very immunogenic. We are wondering if this is actually [what drives] the immune activation that results in immune complexes in the glomeruli” of patients with lupus nephritis, said investigator Gregg Silverman, MD, a professor of medicine and pathology and head of the laboratory of B-cell immunobiology at New York University.

R. gnavus is an obligate anaerobe found in the guts of most people, but in lupus, it might be a problem.

“We are finding a very specific relationship with lupus patients and this bacteria – and this particular antibody,” Dr. Silverman explained in an interview at an international congress on systemic lupus erythematosus. “There’s an expansion of this particular bug, but also a contraction of others” as disease activity progresses.

“It speaks to an imbalance,” he added, and it suggests a role for probiotics or even fecal transplants to restore order.

“What if instead of killing the immune system” in lupus treatment, “we should be reducing or removing a single bacterium or a single molecule?” he asked.

Dr. Silverman is one of many researchers working to unravel the role of the human microbiome in both disease and health. His findings are preliminary, and, as he cautioned, correlation is not causation. But the implications are remarkable, Dr. Silverman noted.

SAN FRANCISCO – New York University researchers have found a ninefold increase of the bacterium Ruminococcus gnavus in the intestines of particularly ill lupus patients.

Not only that, but those patients also had highly elevated antibodies to an endotoxin-like antigen released by one particular R. gnavus strain.

That antigen is “very proinflammatory, very immunogenic. We are wondering if this is actually [what drives] the immune activation that results in immune complexes in the glomeruli” of patients with lupus nephritis, said investigator Gregg Silverman, MD, a professor of medicine and pathology and head of the laboratory of B-cell immunobiology at New York University.

R. gnavus is an obligate anaerobe found in the guts of most people, but in lupus, it might be a problem.

“We are finding a very specific relationship with lupus patients and this bacteria – and this particular antibody,” Dr. Silverman explained in an interview at an international congress on systemic lupus erythematosus. “There’s an expansion of this particular bug, but also a contraction of others” as disease activity progresses.

“It speaks to an imbalance,” he added, and it suggests a role for probiotics or even fecal transplants to restore order.

“What if instead of killing the immune system” in lupus treatment, “we should be reducing or removing a single bacterium or a single molecule?” he asked.

Dr. Silverman is one of many researchers working to unravel the role of the human microbiome in both disease and health. His findings are preliminary, and, as he cautioned, correlation is not causation. But the implications are remarkable, Dr. Silverman noted.

SAN FRANCISCO – New York University researchers have found a ninefold increase of the bacterium Ruminococcus gnavus in the intestines of particularly ill lupus patients.

Not only that, but those patients also had highly elevated antibodies to an endotoxin-like antigen released by one particular R. gnavus strain.

That antigen is “very proinflammatory, very immunogenic. We are wondering if this is actually [what drives] the immune activation that results in immune complexes in the glomeruli” of patients with lupus nephritis, said investigator Gregg Silverman, MD, a professor of medicine and pathology and head of the laboratory of B-cell immunobiology at New York University.

R. gnavus is an obligate anaerobe found in the guts of most people, but in lupus, it might be a problem.

“We are finding a very specific relationship with lupus patients and this bacteria – and this particular antibody,” Dr. Silverman explained in an interview at an international congress on systemic lupus erythematosus. “There’s an expansion of this particular bug, but also a contraction of others” as disease activity progresses.

“It speaks to an imbalance,” he added, and it suggests a role for probiotics or even fecal transplants to restore order.

“What if instead of killing the immune system” in lupus treatment, “we should be reducing or removing a single bacterium or a single molecule?” he asked.

Dr. Silverman is one of many researchers working to unravel the role of the human microbiome in both disease and health. His findings are preliminary, and, as he cautioned, correlation is not causation. But the implications are remarkable, Dr. Silverman noted.

ORLANDO – Stem cell models could boost schizophrenia treatment to a new level, helping to gauge the importance of both rare and common genetic variants that are difficult to study in traditional-style trials, an expert said at the annual congress of the Schizophrenia International Research Society.

The promise of the approach is particularly crucial at this point in the course of schizophrenia research, when the heritability of the disease is being repeatedly underscored in the literature, said Kristen Brennand, PhD, associate professor of neuroscience, genetics and genomics, and psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“It seems that each new paper that comes out raises that estimate of heritability and the numbers I’ve seen recently are as high as 85%,” she said. “Schizophrenia is as heritable as autism and bipolar, more heritable than BRCA1 breast cancer, it’s more heritable than alcoholism. But that heritability is highly complex.”

Highly penetrant variants that are more easily studied account for only a small sliver of this heritability. Rare variants that are harder to study account for more. And common variants – the count is up to 145 and will almost certainly grow – also play a big role.

“These are variants that all of us carry,” Dr. Brennand said. “We all carry dozens of these variants. Patients just either carry more of them or they’re hitting pathways in a different way than they’re hitting the rest of us.”

Using human-induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSC) – grown out of skin biopsy samples from schizophrenia patients and then grown into neural progenitor cells and ultimately neurons – are much more practical for studying the genetics of these variants than case-control studies that require tens of thousands of subjects.

Researchers have found that cohorts using HiPSCs concord with the genetic findings from postmortem datasets of schizophrenia patients.

More recently, in work not yet published, she said her lab has focused on rare 2p16.3 deletions of the NRXN1 gene, finding that neuronal branching is reduced and that there is decreased neuronal activity in schizophrenia patients with these deletions.

Her lab is also using HiPSCs and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats editing to validate the function of common variants and genes linked with schizophrenia. A key finding has been that there could be important relationships between risk genes that are more distant from schizophrenia single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

“We’re expanding the list of potential schizophrenia risk genes by considering not just immediately proximal but also distal interactions between schizophrenia SNPs,” Dr. Brennand said. “If there are 224 genes that are next to risk SNPs, you can add a few hundred more potential genes that might be coregulated by these risk SNPs.”

Harnessing the power of HiPSCs could be the gateway to precision medicine in schizophrenia, she said. A drug that might benefit, say, two out of a dozen patients would likely fail in a clinical trial, unless patient selection is improved.

“Perhaps genotype might predict clinical response, perhaps stem cell drug responsiveness might predict clinical response,” she said. “What I envision is this dream where we have patients and we genotype them, and we better understand how their DNA impacts their gene expression, and how their gene expression impacts their synaptic function, and that this might help us better understand their prognosis.”

Dr. Brennand reported a financial relationship with Alkermes.

ORLANDO – Stem cell models could boost schizophrenia treatment to a new level, helping to gauge the importance of both rare and common genetic variants that are difficult to study in traditional-style trials, an expert said at the annual congress of the Schizophrenia International Research Society.

The promise of the approach is particularly crucial at this point in the course of schizophrenia research, when the heritability of the disease is being repeatedly underscored in the literature, said Kristen Brennand, PhD, associate professor of neuroscience, genetics and genomics, and psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“It seems that each new paper that comes out raises that estimate of heritability and the numbers I’ve seen recently are as high as 85%,” she said. “Schizophrenia is as heritable as autism and bipolar, more heritable than BRCA1 breast cancer, it’s more heritable than alcoholism. But that heritability is highly complex.”

Highly penetrant variants that are more easily studied account for only a small sliver of this heritability. Rare variants that are harder to study account for more. And common variants – the count is up to 145 and will almost certainly grow – also play a big role.

“These are variants that all of us carry,” Dr. Brennand said. “We all carry dozens of these variants. Patients just either carry more of them or they’re hitting pathways in a different way than they’re hitting the rest of us.”

Using human-induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSC) – grown out of skin biopsy samples from schizophrenia patients and then grown into neural progenitor cells and ultimately neurons – are much more practical for studying the genetics of these variants than case-control studies that require tens of thousands of subjects.

Researchers have found that cohorts using HiPSCs concord with the genetic findings from postmortem datasets of schizophrenia patients.

More recently, in work not yet published, she said her lab has focused on rare 2p16.3 deletions of the NRXN1 gene, finding that neuronal branching is reduced and that there is decreased neuronal activity in schizophrenia patients with these deletions.

Her lab is also using HiPSCs and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats editing to validate the function of common variants and genes linked with schizophrenia. A key finding has been that there could be important relationships between risk genes that are more distant from schizophrenia single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

“We’re expanding the list of potential schizophrenia risk genes by considering not just immediately proximal but also distal interactions between schizophrenia SNPs,” Dr. Brennand said. “If there are 224 genes that are next to risk SNPs, you can add a few hundred more potential genes that might be coregulated by these risk SNPs.”

Harnessing the power of HiPSCs could be the gateway to precision medicine in schizophrenia, she said. A drug that might benefit, say, two out of a dozen patients would likely fail in a clinical trial, unless patient selection is improved.

“Perhaps genotype might predict clinical response, perhaps stem cell drug responsiveness might predict clinical response,” she said. “What I envision is this dream where we have patients and we genotype them, and we better understand how their DNA impacts their gene expression, and how their gene expression impacts their synaptic function, and that this might help us better understand their prognosis.”

Dr. Brennand reported a financial relationship with Alkermes.

ORLANDO – Stem cell models could boost schizophrenia treatment to a new level, helping to gauge the importance of both rare and common genetic variants that are difficult to study in traditional-style trials, an expert said at the annual congress of the Schizophrenia International Research Society.

The promise of the approach is particularly crucial at this point in the course of schizophrenia research, when the heritability of the disease is being repeatedly underscored in the literature, said Kristen Brennand, PhD, associate professor of neuroscience, genetics and genomics, and psychiatry at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

“It seems that each new paper that comes out raises that estimate of heritability and the numbers I’ve seen recently are as high as 85%,” she said. “Schizophrenia is as heritable as autism and bipolar, more heritable than BRCA1 breast cancer, it’s more heritable than alcoholism. But that heritability is highly complex.”

Highly penetrant variants that are more easily studied account for only a small sliver of this heritability. Rare variants that are harder to study account for more. And common variants – the count is up to 145 and will almost certainly grow – also play a big role.

“These are variants that all of us carry,” Dr. Brennand said. “We all carry dozens of these variants. Patients just either carry more of them or they’re hitting pathways in a different way than they’re hitting the rest of us.”

Using human-induced pluripotent stem cells (HiPSC) – grown out of skin biopsy samples from schizophrenia patients and then grown into neural progenitor cells and ultimately neurons – are much more practical for studying the genetics of these variants than case-control studies that require tens of thousands of subjects.

Researchers have found that cohorts using HiPSCs concord with the genetic findings from postmortem datasets of schizophrenia patients.

More recently, in work not yet published, she said her lab has focused on rare 2p16.3 deletions of the NRXN1 gene, finding that neuronal branching is reduced and that there is decreased neuronal activity in schizophrenia patients with these deletions.

Her lab is also using HiPSCs and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats editing to validate the function of common variants and genes linked with schizophrenia. A key finding has been that there could be important relationships between risk genes that are more distant from schizophrenia single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

“We’re expanding the list of potential schizophrenia risk genes by considering not just immediately proximal but also distal interactions between schizophrenia SNPs,” Dr. Brennand said. “If there are 224 genes that are next to risk SNPs, you can add a few hundred more potential genes that might be coregulated by these risk SNPs.”

Harnessing the power of HiPSCs could be the gateway to precision medicine in schizophrenia, she said. A drug that might benefit, say, two out of a dozen patients would likely fail in a clinical trial, unless patient selection is improved.

“Perhaps genotype might predict clinical response, perhaps stem cell drug responsiveness might predict clinical response,” she said. “What I envision is this dream where we have patients and we genotype them, and we better understand how their DNA impacts their gene expression, and how their gene expression impacts their synaptic function, and that this might help us better understand their prognosis.”

Dr. Brennand reported a financial relationship with Alkermes.

SAN FRANCISCO – The sequential combination of rituximab followed directly by maintenance belimumab shows considerable promise as a strategy to address the aberrant B-cell immunology present in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) – and thereby improve clinical outcomes, Y.K. Onno Teng, MD, PhD, reported at an international congress on systemic lupus erythematosus.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Dr. Teng, a nephrologist and clinical trialist at Leiden (the Netherlands) University, and his coworkers were pioneers of this one-two punch, in which a two-dose course of rituximab (Rituxan) is given to deplete CD20-positive B-cells, followed by long-term maintenance belimumab (Benlysta) to inhibit repopulation of specific problematic types of B-cells. The rationale for the use of belimumab here lies in the observation that the initial B-cell depletion induced by rituximab triggers a surge in B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), which signals the bone marrow to start making more B-cells. And belimumab famously inhibits BLyS, also known as B-cell activating factor, or BAFF.

Dr. Teng presented the 2-year extended results of Synergistic B-cell Immunomodulation in SLE (SYNBIoSe-1), a phase 2a, open-label, single-arm, proof-of-concept study whose 24-week immunologic results have previously been reported (J Autoimmun. 2018 Jul;91:45-54).

Based in part upon the encouraging SYNBIoSe-1 findings as well as the sound mechanistic rationale for this treatment strategy, the combination of rituximab and belimumab is picking up steam in the research world as a potentially important treatment advance in SLE. Currently underway in patients with nonrenal SLE is the phase 3, GlaxoSmithKline-sponsored, global BLISS-BELIEVE trial, as well as the phase 2 BEAT-LUPUS study, a University College London–based randomized trial of rituximab plus either placebo or belimumab. Also, Dr. Teng and his coworkers are now conducting SYNBIoSe-2, in which patients with lupus nephritis are being randomized to standard therapy with glucocorticoids and mycophenolate or to rituximab, belimumab, and mycophenolate.

SYNBIoSe-2 is a further exploration of the encouraging signal of efficacy for lupus nephritis noted in SYNBIoSe-1. Of the 12 participants in SYNBIoSe-1 who had baseline active lupus nephritis, 8 had a positive renal response to the rituximab/belimumab combo, including 6 patients who achieved a prolonged complete renal response through 104 weeks of follow-up.

SYNBIoSe-1 included 15 patients, all with severe refractory SLE as shown by a median 11-year disease duration and a baseline SLE Disease Activity Index score of 18. Two-thirds of patients achieved sustained low-level disease activity, interrupted in one case by a single major disease flare. Two patients stopped treatment because of a lack of response. Several others left the study because they were doing so well on treatment that they decided the time was right to become pregnant.

Immunologically, patients showed an 84% reduction in B-cell repopulation over the course of 2 years. Particularly striking was the long-term inhibition of double-negative B-cells and IgD-positive naive B-cells, which Dr. Teng described as “very trigger happy” in that they readily become transformed into activated antibody-producing cells.

Sustained specific reductions in anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies and other pathogenic antinuclear antibodies were also documented through 104 weeks.
 

SYNBIoSe-1 results at odds with CALIBRATE trial results

The favorable impact of the rituximab/belimumab combo on lupus nephritis seen in SYNBIoSe-1 is at odds with the results of CALIBRATE, a U.S. study in which 43 patients with active lupus nephritis despite conventional treatment were randomized open label to induction therapy with two doses of rituximab on top of standard background therapy, followed by either belimumab and prednisone or prednisone alone. In CALIBRATE, the anti-BLyS biologic didn’t improve clinical outcomes. Dr. Teng said he believes he knows why.

“There was an important difference in background immunosuppression in the two studies. We used mycophenolate in SYNBIoSe-1, while they used cyclophosphamide in CALIBRATE,” he noted. “Other investigators have shown that mycophenolate mostly depletes plasma cells, whereas cyclophosphamide is very much depleting proliferating cells, predominantly the B-cell population and to a lesser extent the plasma cell population. I think this phenomenon might explain why adding BLyS inhibition to patients treated with CellCept [mycophenolate] might be of more added value than adding it to cyclophosphamide therapy.”

Dr. Teng reported having no financial conflicts regarding the SYNBIoSe-1 study, which was funded by research grants from the Dutch Kidney Foundation and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

[email protected]

SAN FRANCISCO – The sequential combination of rituximab followed directly by maintenance belimumab shows considerable promise as a strategy to address the aberrant B-cell immunology present in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) – and thereby improve clinical outcomes, Y.K. Onno Teng, MD, PhD, reported at an international congress on systemic lupus erythematosus.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Dr. Teng, a nephrologist and clinical trialist at Leiden (the Netherlands) University, and his coworkers were pioneers of this one-two punch, in which a two-dose course of rituximab (Rituxan) is given to deplete CD20-positive B-cells, followed by long-term maintenance belimumab (Benlysta) to inhibit repopulation of specific problematic types of B-cells. The rationale for the use of belimumab here lies in the observation that the initial B-cell depletion induced by rituximab triggers a surge in B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), which signals the bone marrow to start making more B-cells. And belimumab famously inhibits BLyS, also known as B-cell activating factor, or BAFF.

Dr. Teng presented the 2-year extended results of Synergistic B-cell Immunomodulation in SLE (SYNBIoSe-1), a phase 2a, open-label, single-arm, proof-of-concept study whose 24-week immunologic results have previously been reported (J Autoimmun. 2018 Jul;91:45-54).

Based in part upon the encouraging SYNBIoSe-1 findings as well as the sound mechanistic rationale for this treatment strategy, the combination of rituximab and belimumab is picking up steam in the research world as a potentially important treatment advance in SLE. Currently underway in patients with nonrenal SLE is the phase 3, GlaxoSmithKline-sponsored, global BLISS-BELIEVE trial, as well as the phase 2 BEAT-LUPUS study, a University College London–based randomized trial of rituximab plus either placebo or belimumab. Also, Dr. Teng and his coworkers are now conducting SYNBIoSe-2, in which patients with lupus nephritis are being randomized to standard therapy with glucocorticoids and mycophenolate or to rituximab, belimumab, and mycophenolate.

SYNBIoSe-2 is a further exploration of the encouraging signal of efficacy for lupus nephritis noted in SYNBIoSe-1. Of the 12 participants in SYNBIoSe-1 who had baseline active lupus nephritis, 8 had a positive renal response to the rituximab/belimumab combo, including 6 patients who achieved a prolonged complete renal response through 104 weeks of follow-up.

SYNBIoSe-1 included 15 patients, all with severe refractory SLE as shown by a median 11-year disease duration and a baseline SLE Disease Activity Index score of 18. Two-thirds of patients achieved sustained low-level disease activity, interrupted in one case by a single major disease flare. Two patients stopped treatment because of a lack of response. Several others left the study because they were doing so well on treatment that they decided the time was right to become pregnant.

Immunologically, patients showed an 84% reduction in B-cell repopulation over the course of 2 years. Particularly striking was the long-term inhibition of double-negative B-cells and IgD-positive naive B-cells, which Dr. Teng described as “very trigger happy” in that they readily become transformed into activated antibody-producing cells.

Sustained specific reductions in anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies and other pathogenic antinuclear antibodies were also documented through 104 weeks.
 

SYNBIoSe-1 results at odds with CALIBRATE trial results

The favorable impact of the rituximab/belimumab combo on lupus nephritis seen in SYNBIoSe-1 is at odds with the results of CALIBRATE, a U.S. study in which 43 patients with active lupus nephritis despite conventional treatment were randomized open label to induction therapy with two doses of rituximab on top of standard background therapy, followed by either belimumab and prednisone or prednisone alone. In CALIBRATE, the anti-BLyS biologic didn’t improve clinical outcomes. Dr. Teng said he believes he knows why.

“There was an important difference in background immunosuppression in the two studies. We used mycophenolate in SYNBIoSe-1, while they used cyclophosphamide in CALIBRATE,” he noted. “Other investigators have shown that mycophenolate mostly depletes plasma cells, whereas cyclophosphamide is very much depleting proliferating cells, predominantly the B-cell population and to a lesser extent the plasma cell population. I think this phenomenon might explain why adding BLyS inhibition to patients treated with CellCept [mycophenolate] might be of more added value than adding it to cyclophosphamide therapy.”

Dr. Teng reported having no financial conflicts regarding the SYNBIoSe-1 study, which was funded by research grants from the Dutch Kidney Foundation and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

[email protected]

SAN FRANCISCO – The sequential combination of rituximab followed directly by maintenance belimumab shows considerable promise as a strategy to address the aberrant B-cell immunology present in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) – and thereby improve clinical outcomes, Y.K. Onno Teng, MD, PhD, reported at an international congress on systemic lupus erythematosus.

Bruce Jancin/MDedge News

Dr. Teng, a nephrologist and clinical trialist at Leiden (the Netherlands) University, and his coworkers were pioneers of this one-two punch, in which a two-dose course of rituximab (Rituxan) is given to deplete CD20-positive B-cells, followed by long-term maintenance belimumab (Benlysta) to inhibit repopulation of specific problematic types of B-cells. The rationale for the use of belimumab here lies in the observation that the initial B-cell depletion induced by rituximab triggers a surge in B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), which signals the bone marrow to start making more B-cells. And belimumab famously inhibits BLyS, also known as B-cell activating factor, or BAFF.

Dr. Teng presented the 2-year extended results of Synergistic B-cell Immunomodulation in SLE (SYNBIoSe-1), a phase 2a, open-label, single-arm, proof-of-concept study whose 24-week immunologic results have previously been reported (J Autoimmun. 2018 Jul;91:45-54).

Based in part upon the encouraging SYNBIoSe-1 findings as well as the sound mechanistic rationale for this treatment strategy, the combination of rituximab and belimumab is picking up steam in the research world as a potentially important treatment advance in SLE. Currently underway in patients with nonrenal SLE is the phase 3, GlaxoSmithKline-sponsored, global BLISS-BELIEVE trial, as well as the phase 2 BEAT-LUPUS study, a University College London–based randomized trial of rituximab plus either placebo or belimumab. Also, Dr. Teng and his coworkers are now conducting SYNBIoSe-2, in which patients with lupus nephritis are being randomized to standard therapy with glucocorticoids and mycophenolate or to rituximab, belimumab, and mycophenolate.

SYNBIoSe-2 is a further exploration of the encouraging signal of efficacy for lupus nephritis noted in SYNBIoSe-1. Of the 12 participants in SYNBIoSe-1 who had baseline active lupus nephritis, 8 had a positive renal response to the rituximab/belimumab combo, including 6 patients who achieved a prolonged complete renal response through 104 weeks of follow-up.

SYNBIoSe-1 included 15 patients, all with severe refractory SLE as shown by a median 11-year disease duration and a baseline SLE Disease Activity Index score of 18. Two-thirds of patients achieved sustained low-level disease activity, interrupted in one case by a single major disease flare. Two patients stopped treatment because of a lack of response. Several others left the study because they were doing so well on treatment that they decided the time was right to become pregnant.

Immunologically, patients showed an 84% reduction in B-cell repopulation over the course of 2 years. Particularly striking was the long-term inhibition of double-negative B-cells and IgD-positive naive B-cells, which Dr. Teng described as “very trigger happy” in that they readily become transformed into activated antibody-producing cells.

Sustained specific reductions in anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies and other pathogenic antinuclear antibodies were also documented through 104 weeks.
 

SYNBIoSe-1 results at odds with CALIBRATE trial results

The favorable impact of the rituximab/belimumab combo on lupus nephritis seen in SYNBIoSe-1 is at odds with the results of CALIBRATE, a U.S. study in which 43 patients with active lupus nephritis despite conventional treatment were randomized open label to induction therapy with two doses of rituximab on top of standard background therapy, followed by either belimumab and prednisone or prednisone alone. In CALIBRATE, the anti-BLyS biologic didn’t improve clinical outcomes. Dr. Teng said he believes he knows why.

“There was an important difference in background immunosuppression in the two studies. We used mycophenolate in SYNBIoSe-1, while they used cyclophosphamide in CALIBRATE,” he noted. “Other investigators have shown that mycophenolate mostly depletes plasma cells, whereas cyclophosphamide is very much depleting proliferating cells, predominantly the B-cell population and to a lesser extent the plasma cell population. I think this phenomenon might explain why adding BLyS inhibition to patients treated with CellCept [mycophenolate] might be of more added value than adding it to cyclophosphamide therapy.”

Dr. Teng reported having no financial conflicts regarding the SYNBIoSe-1 study, which was funded by research grants from the Dutch Kidney Foundation and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

[email protected]