Heparin-binding protein may foretell severe community-acquired pneumonia progression in children

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Heparin-binding protein (HBP) may outperform the conventional biomarkers in predicting disease progression in children with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: After adjusting for age, high HBP levels showed an independent correlation with respiratory failure (RF; odds ratio [OR] 1.008; 95% CI 1.003-1.013) in children with severe CAP. Among other biomarkers, HBP exhibited the highest predictive power for identifying children developing RF or sepsis, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.68 and 0.85, respectively, along with the best specificity at 96.3%.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study on 157 children who were admitted to an ICU ward for severe CAP, of which 106 presented with RF and 48 developed sepsis.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Changsha Science and Technology Bureau Science Foundation, China. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Huang C et al. Front Pediatr. 2021 (Oct 28). Doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.759535.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Heparin-binding protein (HBP) may outperform the conventional biomarkers in predicting disease progression in children with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: After adjusting for age, high HBP levels showed an independent correlation with respiratory failure (RF; odds ratio [OR] 1.008; 95% CI 1.003-1.013) in children with severe CAP. Among other biomarkers, HBP exhibited the highest predictive power for identifying children developing RF or sepsis, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.68 and 0.85, respectively, along with the best specificity at 96.3%.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study on 157 children who were admitted to an ICU ward for severe CAP, of which 106 presented with RF and 48 developed sepsis.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Changsha Science and Technology Bureau Science Foundation, China. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Huang C et al. Front Pediatr. 2021 (Oct 28). Doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.759535.

Key clinical point: Heparin-binding protein (HBP) may outperform the conventional biomarkers in predicting disease progression in children with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: After adjusting for age, high HBP levels showed an independent correlation with respiratory failure (RF; odds ratio [OR] 1.008; 95% CI 1.003-1.013) in children with severe CAP. Among other biomarkers, HBP exhibited the highest predictive power for identifying children developing RF or sepsis, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.68 and 0.85, respectively, along with the best specificity at 96.3%.

Study details: Findings are from a retrospective observational study on 157 children who were admitted to an ICU ward for severe CAP, of which 106 presented with RF and 48 developed sepsis.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by the Changsha Science and Technology Bureau Science Foundation, China. The authors declared no conflict of interests.

Source: Huang C et al. Front Pediatr. 2021 (Oct 28). Doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.759535.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

Ceftaroline shows potential against community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Administration of ceftaroline alone or in combination resulted in lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) vs. standard therapy.

Main finding: After adjustment for confounding factors, patients receiving ceftaroline had a lower in-hospital mortality rate (13% vs. 21%; adjusted hazard ratio 0.41; P = .031) and longer median hospital stay (13 days vs. 10 days; P = .007) than those receiving standard therapy.

Study details: This retrospective observational study matched 78 patients with CAP who received ceftaroline (as monotherapy or in combination with azithromycin, levofloxacin, etc.) with 78 control patients who received standard therapy.

Disclosures: The study received financial support from Pfizer, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, and 2009 Support to Research Groups of Catalonia 911, IDIBAPS. Pfizer, in addition to a couple of other sources, provided research grants/fellowships to Dr. Cilloniz and other authors.

Source: Cilloniz C et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 (Nov 12). Doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04378-0.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Administration of ceftaroline alone or in combination resulted in lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) vs. standard therapy.

Main finding: After adjustment for confounding factors, patients receiving ceftaroline had a lower in-hospital mortality rate (13% vs. 21%; adjusted hazard ratio 0.41; P = .031) and longer median hospital stay (13 days vs. 10 days; P = .007) than those receiving standard therapy.

Study details: This retrospective observational study matched 78 patients with CAP who received ceftaroline (as monotherapy or in combination with azithromycin, levofloxacin, etc.) with 78 control patients who received standard therapy.

Disclosures: The study received financial support from Pfizer, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, and 2009 Support to Research Groups of Catalonia 911, IDIBAPS. Pfizer, in addition to a couple of other sources, provided research grants/fellowships to Dr. Cilloniz and other authors.

Source: Cilloniz C et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 (Nov 12). Doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04378-0.

Key clinical point: Administration of ceftaroline alone or in combination resulted in lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) vs. standard therapy.

Main finding: After adjustment for confounding factors, patients receiving ceftaroline had a lower in-hospital mortality rate (13% vs. 21%; adjusted hazard ratio 0.41; P = .031) and longer median hospital stay (13 days vs. 10 days; P = .007) than those receiving standard therapy.

Study details: This retrospective observational study matched 78 patients with CAP who received ceftaroline (as monotherapy or in combination with azithromycin, levofloxacin, etc.) with 78 control patients who received standard therapy.

Disclosures: The study received financial support from Pfizer, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, and 2009 Support to Research Groups of Catalonia 911, IDIBAPS. Pfizer, in addition to a couple of other sources, provided research grants/fellowships to Dr. Cilloniz and other authors.

Source: Cilloniz C et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 (Nov 12). Doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04378-0.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

Beta-lactam + doxycycline combo may improve outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia in elderly

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: On comparing regimes recommended by the 2019 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines, those containing doxycycline were associated with decreased mortality in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: After propensity-matching, patients receiving beta-lactam + doxycycline showed significantly reduced 30-day (odds ratio [OR] 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.84) and 90-day (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.92) mortality vs. those on nondoxycycline-containing regimes.

Study details: This retrospective observational cohort study included 70,533 patients aged 65 years who were admitted to a non-ICU hospital ward for CAP and received at least 1 dose of the 2019 ATS/IDSA guideline-recommended antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours after admission. Of these, 5,282 patients received doxycycline-containing combinations.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the US National Institute of Nursing Research. CA Alvarez declared serving as an advisory board member for a pharmaceutical organization.

Source: Uddin M et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;ciab863 (Nov 9). Doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab863.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: On comparing regimes recommended by the 2019 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines, those containing doxycycline were associated with decreased mortality in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: After propensity-matching, patients receiving beta-lactam + doxycycline showed significantly reduced 30-day (odds ratio [OR] 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.84) and 90-day (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.92) mortality vs. those on nondoxycycline-containing regimes.

Study details: This retrospective observational cohort study included 70,533 patients aged 65 years who were admitted to a non-ICU hospital ward for CAP and received at least 1 dose of the 2019 ATS/IDSA guideline-recommended antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours after admission. Of these, 5,282 patients received doxycycline-containing combinations.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the US National Institute of Nursing Research. CA Alvarez declared serving as an advisory board member for a pharmaceutical organization.

Source: Uddin M et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;ciab863 (Nov 9). Doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab863.

Key clinical point: On comparing regimes recommended by the 2019 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) guidelines, those containing doxycycline were associated with decreased mortality in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Main finding: After propensity-matching, patients receiving beta-lactam + doxycycline showed significantly reduced 30-day (odds ratio [OR] 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.84) and 90-day (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.92) mortality vs. those on nondoxycycline-containing regimes.

Study details: This retrospective observational cohort study included 70,533 patients aged 65 years who were admitted to a non-ICU hospital ward for CAP and received at least 1 dose of the 2019 ATS/IDSA guideline-recommended antimicrobial therapy within 48 hours after admission. Of these, 5,282 patients received doxycycline-containing combinations.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the US National Institute of Nursing Research. CA Alvarez declared serving as an advisory board member for a pharmaceutical organization.

Source: Uddin M et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;ciab863 (Nov 9). Doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab863.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

Community-acquired pneumonia in infants inflicts a lasting impact during early childhood

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Occurrence of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in infants aged below 2 years increases their risk for subsequent respiratory disease when between 2 and 5 years of age.

Main finding: The rate of chronic respiratory disorder from 2-5 years of age, reactive airway disease, and CAP hospitalization after 2 years of age was 2.4-fold (95% CI 2.1-2.6), 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.6-3.8), and 6.3-fold (95% CI 3.6-10.9) higher in patients with CAP vs. comparison patients.

Study details: The data come from a retrospective study including 1,343 infants less than 2 years of age who were hospitalized once or more for CAP and matched with 6,715 comparator infants with no evidence of pneumonia.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Some of the authors declared being directly employed by Pfizer or another organization that received financial support from Pfizer.

Source: Lapidot R et al. Repir Med. 2021:106671 (Oct 27). Doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106671.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Occurrence of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in infants aged below 2 years increases their risk for subsequent respiratory disease when between 2 and 5 years of age.

Main finding: The rate of chronic respiratory disorder from 2-5 years of age, reactive airway disease, and CAP hospitalization after 2 years of age was 2.4-fold (95% CI 2.1-2.6), 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.6-3.8), and 6.3-fold (95% CI 3.6-10.9) higher in patients with CAP vs. comparison patients.

Study details: The data come from a retrospective study including 1,343 infants less than 2 years of age who were hospitalized once or more for CAP and matched with 6,715 comparator infants with no evidence of pneumonia.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Some of the authors declared being directly employed by Pfizer or another organization that received financial support from Pfizer.

Source: Lapidot R et al. Repir Med. 2021:106671 (Oct 27). Doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106671.

Key clinical point: Occurrence of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in infants aged below 2 years increases their risk for subsequent respiratory disease when between 2 and 5 years of age.

Main finding: The rate of chronic respiratory disorder from 2-5 years of age, reactive airway disease, and CAP hospitalization after 2 years of age was 2.4-fold (95% CI 2.1-2.6), 3.2-fold (95% CI 2.6-3.8), and 6.3-fold (95% CI 3.6-10.9) higher in patients with CAP vs. comparison patients.

Study details: The data come from a retrospective study including 1,343 infants less than 2 years of age who were hospitalized once or more for CAP and matched with 6,715 comparator infants with no evidence of pneumonia.

Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Some of the authors declared being directly employed by Pfizer or another organization that received financial support from Pfizer.

Source: Lapidot R et al. Repir Med. 2021:106671 (Oct 27). Doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106671.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

How effectively can PSI and CURB-65 predict in-hospital mortality in SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia?

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and the confusion, urea, respiratory rate, and blood pressure (CURB)-65 score are as effective at predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as they are in those with non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Main finding: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP for PSI was 0.82 (95% Bayesian credible interval [bCI] 0.78-0.86) and 0.79 (95% bCI 0.77-0.80) and that for CURB-65 was 0.79 (95% bCI 0.75-0.84) and 0.75 (95% bCI 0.73-0.77), respectively.

Study details: This was a secondary analysis of 8,081 patients from 2 population-based cohort studies, each of which included adults hospitalized for either SARS-CoV-2 CAP or non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Center for Excellence for Research in Infectious Diseases at the University of Louisville. None of the authors declared any potential conflict of interests.

Source: Bradley J et al. Chest. 2021 (Nov 2). Doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.031.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and the confusion, urea, respiratory rate, and blood pressure (CURB)-65 score are as effective at predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as they are in those with non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Main finding: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP for PSI was 0.82 (95% Bayesian credible interval [bCI] 0.78-0.86) and 0.79 (95% bCI 0.77-0.80) and that for CURB-65 was 0.79 (95% bCI 0.75-0.84) and 0.75 (95% bCI 0.73-0.77), respectively.

Study details: This was a secondary analysis of 8,081 patients from 2 population-based cohort studies, each of which included adults hospitalized for either SARS-CoV-2 CAP or non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Center for Excellence for Research in Infectious Diseases at the University of Louisville. None of the authors declared any potential conflict of interests.

Source: Bradley J et al. Chest. 2021 (Nov 2). Doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.031.

Key clinical point: Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and the confusion, urea, respiratory rate, and blood pressure (CURB)-65 score are as effective at predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as they are in those with non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Main finding: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP for PSI was 0.82 (95% Bayesian credible interval [bCI] 0.78-0.86) and 0.79 (95% bCI 0.77-0.80) and that for CURB-65 was 0.79 (95% bCI 0.75-0.84) and 0.75 (95% bCI 0.73-0.77), respectively.

Study details: This was a secondary analysis of 8,081 patients from 2 population-based cohort studies, each of which included adults hospitalized for either SARS-CoV-2 CAP or non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the Center for Excellence for Research in Infectious Diseases at the University of Louisville. None of the authors declared any potential conflict of interests.

Source: Bradley J et al. Chest. 2021 (Nov 2). Doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.10.031.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

Male sex and age contribute towards treatment failure of moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: In patients with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who reached clinical stability after 3 days of antibiotic treatment, male sex and age were the main risk factors for treatment failure.

Main finding: After excluding the Pneumonia Severity Index score and urea level at day 0, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.08-3.49) and age per year (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.05) showed a significant association with treatment failure at day 15.

Study details: This was a secondary analysis including 291 of the 310 patients from the Pneumonia Short Treatment trial who were hospitalized for moderately severe CAP and were clinically stable after 3 days of receiving β-lactams, which is when they were randomly assigned to receive oral amoxicillin-clavulanate or placebo for 5 further days.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the French Ministry of Health and DRCI of Versailles. Dr. Crémieux reported receiving grants from an additional source outside the study.

Source: Dinh A et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2129566 (Oct 15). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29566.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In patients with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who reached clinical stability after 3 days of antibiotic treatment, male sex and age were the main risk factors for treatment failure.

Main finding: After excluding the Pneumonia Severity Index score and urea level at day 0, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.08-3.49) and age per year (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.05) showed a significant association with treatment failure at day 15.

Study details: This was a secondary analysis including 291 of the 310 patients from the Pneumonia Short Treatment trial who were hospitalized for moderately severe CAP and were clinically stable after 3 days of receiving β-lactams, which is when they were randomly assigned to receive oral amoxicillin-clavulanate or placebo for 5 further days.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the French Ministry of Health and DRCI of Versailles. Dr. Crémieux reported receiving grants from an additional source outside the study.

Source: Dinh A et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2129566 (Oct 15). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29566.

Key clinical point: In patients with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who reached clinical stability after 3 days of antibiotic treatment, male sex and age were the main risk factors for treatment failure.

Main finding: After excluding the Pneumonia Severity Index score and urea level at day 0, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.08-3.49) and age per year (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.05) showed a significant association with treatment failure at day 15.

Study details: This was a secondary analysis including 291 of the 310 patients from the Pneumonia Short Treatment trial who were hospitalized for moderately severe CAP and were clinically stable after 3 days of receiving β-lactams, which is when they were randomly assigned to receive oral amoxicillin-clavulanate or placebo for 5 further days.

Disclosures: The study was supported by the French Ministry of Health and DRCI of Versailles. Dr. Crémieux reported receiving grants from an additional source outside the study.

Source: Dinh A et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2129566 (Oct 15). Doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29566.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

Breaking through the optimal amoxicillin dose and duration in children with community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: In children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) discharged from emergency departments or inpatient wards, further outpatient treatment with amoxicillin at a lower dose was not inferior to a higher dose, and a 3-day treatment course was not inferior to a 7-day treatment course.

Main finding: Antibiotic retreatment rates in the 4-week period after hospital discharge in the lower dose vs. the higher dose group were 12.6% vs. 12.4% (difference 0.2%; 95% CI –∞ to 4.0%) and those in the shorter duration vs. the longer duration group were 12.5% vs. 12.5% (difference 0.1%; 95% CI –∞ to 3.9%).

Study details: Findings are from the CAP-IT trial including 814 children > 6 months old with CAP who were randomly assigned 1:1 after hospital discharge to receive the 4 possible combinations of amoxicillin dose (35-50 or 70-90 mg/kg) and duration (3 or 7 days).

Disclosures: The trial was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Program and Antimicrobial Resistance Themed Call. Some of the authors including the lead author reported receiving research grants from the NIHR/HTA.

Source: Bielicki JA et al. JAMA. 2021;326(17):1713-1724 (Nov 2). Doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17843.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) discharged from emergency departments or inpatient wards, further outpatient treatment with amoxicillin at a lower dose was not inferior to a higher dose, and a 3-day treatment course was not inferior to a 7-day treatment course.

Main finding: Antibiotic retreatment rates in the 4-week period after hospital discharge in the lower dose vs. the higher dose group were 12.6% vs. 12.4% (difference 0.2%; 95% CI –∞ to 4.0%) and those in the shorter duration vs. the longer duration group were 12.5% vs. 12.5% (difference 0.1%; 95% CI –∞ to 3.9%).

Study details: Findings are from the CAP-IT trial including 814 children > 6 months old with CAP who were randomly assigned 1:1 after hospital discharge to receive the 4 possible combinations of amoxicillin dose (35-50 or 70-90 mg/kg) and duration (3 or 7 days).

Disclosures: The trial was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Program and Antimicrobial Resistance Themed Call. Some of the authors including the lead author reported receiving research grants from the NIHR/HTA.

Source: Bielicki JA et al. JAMA. 2021;326(17):1713-1724 (Nov 2). Doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17843.

Key clinical point: In children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) discharged from emergency departments or inpatient wards, further outpatient treatment with amoxicillin at a lower dose was not inferior to a higher dose, and a 3-day treatment course was not inferior to a 7-day treatment course.

Main finding: Antibiotic retreatment rates in the 4-week period after hospital discharge in the lower dose vs. the higher dose group were 12.6% vs. 12.4% (difference 0.2%; 95% CI –∞ to 4.0%) and those in the shorter duration vs. the longer duration group were 12.5% vs. 12.5% (difference 0.1%; 95% CI –∞ to 3.9%).

Study details: Findings are from the CAP-IT trial including 814 children > 6 months old with CAP who were randomly assigned 1:1 after hospital discharge to receive the 4 possible combinations of amoxicillin dose (35-50 or 70-90 mg/kg) and duration (3 or 7 days).

Disclosures: The trial was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Program and Antimicrobial Resistance Themed Call. Some of the authors including the lead author reported receiving research grants from the NIHR/HTA.

Source: Bielicki JA et al. JAMA. 2021;326(17):1713-1724 (Nov 2). Doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17843.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

Fostering narrow-spectrum antibiotic use in moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention emerged successful in advocating a shift from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotics for treating moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) while averting any safety concerns.

Main finding: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention effectuated a decrease in the adjusted mean broad-spectrum days of therapy per patient from 6.5 days to 4.8 days, with an adjusted relative reduction of 26.6% (95% CI 18.0%-35.3%). The adjusted risk difference of 0.4% (90% CI –2.7% to 2.4%) indicated noninferiority.

Study details: The data come from the investigator-initiated, noninferiority, CAP-PACT trial including 4,084 adult patients receiving antibiotics for moderately severe CAP post admission to a non-ICU hospital ward, of whom 2,235 patients were admitted during the control period and 1,849 during the intervention period.

Disclosures: The authors received no financial support for the study. CH van Werkhoven reported receiving grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from a few sources outside the study, in addition to obtaining a patent for the prediction of clinical manifestations of gut microbiota.

Source: Schweitzer VA et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021(Oct 7). Doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00255-3.

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention emerged successful in advocating a shift from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotics for treating moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) while averting any safety concerns.

Main finding: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention effectuated a decrease in the adjusted mean broad-spectrum days of therapy per patient from 6.5 days to 4.8 days, with an adjusted relative reduction of 26.6% (95% CI 18.0%-35.3%). The adjusted risk difference of 0.4% (90% CI –2.7% to 2.4%) indicated noninferiority.

Study details: The data come from the investigator-initiated, noninferiority, CAP-PACT trial including 4,084 adult patients receiving antibiotics for moderately severe CAP post admission to a non-ICU hospital ward, of whom 2,235 patients were admitted during the control period and 1,849 during the intervention period.

Disclosures: The authors received no financial support for the study. CH van Werkhoven reported receiving grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from a few sources outside the study, in addition to obtaining a patent for the prediction of clinical manifestations of gut microbiota.

Source: Schweitzer VA et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021(Oct 7). Doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00255-3.

Key clinical point: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention emerged successful in advocating a shift from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotics for treating moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) while averting any safety concerns.

Main finding: Antimicrobial stewardship intervention effectuated a decrease in the adjusted mean broad-spectrum days of therapy per patient from 6.5 days to 4.8 days, with an adjusted relative reduction of 26.6% (95% CI 18.0%-35.3%). The adjusted risk difference of 0.4% (90% CI –2.7% to 2.4%) indicated noninferiority.

Study details: The data come from the investigator-initiated, noninferiority, CAP-PACT trial including 4,084 adult patients receiving antibiotics for moderately severe CAP post admission to a non-ICU hospital ward, of whom 2,235 patients were admitted during the control period and 1,849 during the intervention period.

Disclosures: The authors received no financial support for the study. CH van Werkhoven reported receiving grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from a few sources outside the study, in addition to obtaining a patent for the prediction of clinical manifestations of gut microbiota.

Source: Schweitzer VA et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021(Oct 7). Doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00255-3.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: CAP December 2021
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article
Activity Salesforce Deliverable ID
sf330976.1
Activity ID
77855
Product Name
Clinical Edge Journal Scan
Product ID
124
Supporter Name /ID
Xenleta [ 5933 ]

No serious CV risks for elderly after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine

Article Type
Changed

A French population-based study provides further evidence that the BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine does not increase the short-term risk for serious cardiovascular adverse events in older people.

The study showed no increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or pulmonary embolism (PE) following vaccination in adults aged 75 years or older in the 14 days following vaccination.

“These findings regarding the BNT162b2 vaccine’s short-term cardiovascular safety profile in older people are reassuring. They should be taken into account by doctors when considering implementing a third dose of the vaccine in older people,” Marie Joelle Jabagi, PharmD, PhD, with the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France, said in an interview.

Ridofranz/Getty Images


The study was published as a research letter online Nov. 22 in JAMA.

The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine was the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine authorized in France and has been widely used in older people. The phase 3 trials of the vaccine showed no increase in cardiovascular events, but older people were underrepresented in the trials.

As of April 30, 2021, nearly 3.9 million French adults aged 75 or older had received at least one dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and 3.2 million had received two doses.

Using the French National Health Data System linked to the national COVID-19 vaccination database, Dr. Jabagi and her colleagues identified all unvaccinated or vaccinated adults aged 75 and older who were hospitalized between Dec. 15, 2020, and April 30, 2021, for acute MI, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, or PE.

During the 4.5-month study period, 11,113 elderly were hospitalized for acute MI, 17,014 for ischemic stroke, 4,804 for hemorrhagic stroke, and 7,221 for PE. Of these, 58.6%, 54.0%, 42.7%, and 55.3%, respectively, had received at least one dose of vaccine.

In the 14 days following receipt of either dose, no significant increased risk was found for any outcome, the investigators report.

The relative incidence (RI) for MI after the first and second dose was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.88-1.06) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.93-1.16), respectively.

For ischemic stroke, the RI was 0.90 after the first dose (95% CI, 0.84-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-1.02) after the second; for hemorrhagic stroke, the RI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.81-1.15), respectively.

For PE, the RI was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.96) after the first dose and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.95-1.26) after the second dose.

There was also no significant increase for any of the cardiovascular events when the exposure risk window was subdivided into 1 to 7 days and 8 to 14 days.

“Evaluating the short-term risk of hospitalization for severe cardiovascular events after the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in older people was a priority, especially after signals for hypertension and cardiovascular, thromboembolic, and hemorrhagic events have been issued from spontaneous notification data,” Dr. Jabagi said in an interview.

“The results of this nationwide study provide further solid evidence regarding the lack of increase of serious cardiovascular adverse events in older people in the 14 days following both doses of the vaccine,” Dr. Jabagi said.

The French study supports a recent U.S. study of more than 6 million people demonstrating that serious health risks were no more common in the first 3 weeks after Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccination compared with 22 to 42 days later.

As previously reported by this news organization, mRNA vaccination was not associated with greater risks for Guillain-Barré syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis, stroke, or 20 other serious outcomes.

The current study had no specific funding. Dr. Jabagi and colleagues have declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Topics
Sections

A French population-based study provides further evidence that the BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine does not increase the short-term risk for serious cardiovascular adverse events in older people.

The study showed no increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or pulmonary embolism (PE) following vaccination in adults aged 75 years or older in the 14 days following vaccination.

“These findings regarding the BNT162b2 vaccine’s short-term cardiovascular safety profile in older people are reassuring. They should be taken into account by doctors when considering implementing a third dose of the vaccine in older people,” Marie Joelle Jabagi, PharmD, PhD, with the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France, said in an interview.

Ridofranz/Getty Images


The study was published as a research letter online Nov. 22 in JAMA.

The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine was the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine authorized in France and has been widely used in older people. The phase 3 trials of the vaccine showed no increase in cardiovascular events, but older people were underrepresented in the trials.

As of April 30, 2021, nearly 3.9 million French adults aged 75 or older had received at least one dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and 3.2 million had received two doses.

Using the French National Health Data System linked to the national COVID-19 vaccination database, Dr. Jabagi and her colleagues identified all unvaccinated or vaccinated adults aged 75 and older who were hospitalized between Dec. 15, 2020, and April 30, 2021, for acute MI, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, or PE.

During the 4.5-month study period, 11,113 elderly were hospitalized for acute MI, 17,014 for ischemic stroke, 4,804 for hemorrhagic stroke, and 7,221 for PE. Of these, 58.6%, 54.0%, 42.7%, and 55.3%, respectively, had received at least one dose of vaccine.

In the 14 days following receipt of either dose, no significant increased risk was found for any outcome, the investigators report.

The relative incidence (RI) for MI after the first and second dose was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.88-1.06) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.93-1.16), respectively.

For ischemic stroke, the RI was 0.90 after the first dose (95% CI, 0.84-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-1.02) after the second; for hemorrhagic stroke, the RI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.81-1.15), respectively.

For PE, the RI was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.96) after the first dose and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.95-1.26) after the second dose.

There was also no significant increase for any of the cardiovascular events when the exposure risk window was subdivided into 1 to 7 days and 8 to 14 days.

“Evaluating the short-term risk of hospitalization for severe cardiovascular events after the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in older people was a priority, especially after signals for hypertension and cardiovascular, thromboembolic, and hemorrhagic events have been issued from spontaneous notification data,” Dr. Jabagi said in an interview.

“The results of this nationwide study provide further solid evidence regarding the lack of increase of serious cardiovascular adverse events in older people in the 14 days following both doses of the vaccine,” Dr. Jabagi said.

The French study supports a recent U.S. study of more than 6 million people demonstrating that serious health risks were no more common in the first 3 weeks after Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccination compared with 22 to 42 days later.

As previously reported by this news organization, mRNA vaccination was not associated with greater risks for Guillain-Barré syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis, stroke, or 20 other serious outcomes.

The current study had no specific funding. Dr. Jabagi and colleagues have declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

A French population-based study provides further evidence that the BNT162b2 Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine does not increase the short-term risk for serious cardiovascular adverse events in older people.

The study showed no increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or pulmonary embolism (PE) following vaccination in adults aged 75 years or older in the 14 days following vaccination.

“These findings regarding the BNT162b2 vaccine’s short-term cardiovascular safety profile in older people are reassuring. They should be taken into account by doctors when considering implementing a third dose of the vaccine in older people,” Marie Joelle Jabagi, PharmD, PhD, with the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, Saint-Denis, France, said in an interview.

Ridofranz/Getty Images


The study was published as a research letter online Nov. 22 in JAMA.

The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine was the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine authorized in France and has been widely used in older people. The phase 3 trials of the vaccine showed no increase in cardiovascular events, but older people were underrepresented in the trials.

As of April 30, 2021, nearly 3.9 million French adults aged 75 or older had received at least one dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and 3.2 million had received two doses.

Using the French National Health Data System linked to the national COVID-19 vaccination database, Dr. Jabagi and her colleagues identified all unvaccinated or vaccinated adults aged 75 and older who were hospitalized between Dec. 15, 2020, and April 30, 2021, for acute MI, hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, or PE.

During the 4.5-month study period, 11,113 elderly were hospitalized for acute MI, 17,014 for ischemic stroke, 4,804 for hemorrhagic stroke, and 7,221 for PE. Of these, 58.6%, 54.0%, 42.7%, and 55.3%, respectively, had received at least one dose of vaccine.

In the 14 days following receipt of either dose, no significant increased risk was found for any outcome, the investigators report.

The relative incidence (RI) for MI after the first and second dose was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.88-1.06) and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.93-1.16), respectively.

For ischemic stroke, the RI was 0.90 after the first dose (95% CI, 0.84-0.98) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.84-1.02) after the second; for hemorrhagic stroke, the RI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.04) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.81-1.15), respectively.

For PE, the RI was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.75-0.96) after the first dose and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.95-1.26) after the second dose.

There was also no significant increase for any of the cardiovascular events when the exposure risk window was subdivided into 1 to 7 days and 8 to 14 days.

“Evaluating the short-term risk of hospitalization for severe cardiovascular events after the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in older people was a priority, especially after signals for hypertension and cardiovascular, thromboembolic, and hemorrhagic events have been issued from spontaneous notification data,” Dr. Jabagi said in an interview.

“The results of this nationwide study provide further solid evidence regarding the lack of increase of serious cardiovascular adverse events in older people in the 14 days following both doses of the vaccine,” Dr. Jabagi said.

The French study supports a recent U.S. study of more than 6 million people demonstrating that serious health risks were no more common in the first 3 weeks after Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccination compared with 22 to 42 days later.

As previously reported by this news organization, mRNA vaccination was not associated with greater risks for Guillain-Barré syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis, stroke, or 20 other serious outcomes.

The current study had no specific funding. Dr. Jabagi and colleagues have declared no relevant conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

The gender pay gap, care economy, and mental health

Article Type
Changed

According to an analysis by the Pew Research Center and a report by the National Women’s Law Center, women were earning approximately $0.83-$0.84 for every $1.00 earned by their male counterparts in 2020. Accordingly, women would need to work an additional 42 days to receive compensation for earnings by men during that year. Moreover, these gaps exist with respect to race inequalities. For example, Black and Latinx women who are working full-time were reported to earn approximately $0.64 and $0.57, respectively, for every $1.00 compared with their white, non-Hispanic male counterparts. Striking, isn’t it?

Leanna M.W. Lui

The gender pay gap also affects physicians. A 2021 Medscape survey found that male physicians earn 35% more than female physicians. The biggest gap seems to be between male and female specialists, with men earning $376,000 and women $283,000.
 

Gender inequality and COVID-19

In addition to workplace responsibilities, women are more likely to take on unpaid positions in the informal care economy – examples of these tasks include cleaning, grocery shopping, and child care. In fact, the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the burden of unpaid care work among women, which often incurs a significant impact on their participation in the paid economy.

A study in the United States evaluating the impact of gender inequality during COVID-19 suggested that the rise in unemployment among women during this time may be related to decreased occupational flexibility. Accordingly, the closure of schools and caregiving facilities has translated into increased responsibilities as the informal caregiver, and a decreased ability to fulfill work obligations. Consequently, women may be overwhelmed and unable to maintain their employment status, are limited in their work opportunities, and/or are furloughed or passed over for promotions.
 

Gendered pay gaps affect mental health

A study by Platt and colleagues investigated the relationship between gendered wage gaps and gendered disparities in depression and anxiety disorders. Researchers found that females with a lower income compared with their matched male counterparts were more likely to experience depression and generalized anxiety disorders (i.e., they were 2.4 times more likely to experience depression and 4 times more likely to experience anxiety), while women who earned more than men did not report a significant difference in depression there were reduced gaps in the prevalence of anxiety disorders. As such, it has been suggested that wage gap inequalities are a contributing factor to gendered mental health disparities.

Reduced pay is not only a signifier of reduced returns on human capital. It may also have implications for one’s role in the care economy (e.g., greater time allocation as a result of reduced return), and may result in a higher likelihood for relocation as it relates to a partner’s work, overqualification for a position, inflexible work schedules, and reduced work autonomy.

Wage inequalities may act as a proxy for workplace inequalities such as promotions, prestigious projects, limited upward mobility, and internalized negative workplace experiences, all of which may contribute to increased sleep loss, stress, and related mental health stressors.

One might say, “A few cents, so what?” In addition to income itself, there’s a broader theme at play, which is gender discrimination and inequality. We should encourage conversations around the gender pay gap and develop strategies to combat this economic and social disparity.
 

Ms. Lui completed an HBSc global health specialist degree at the University of Toronto, where she is now an MSc candidate. She has received income from Braxia Scientific Corp. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Topics
Sections

According to an analysis by the Pew Research Center and a report by the National Women’s Law Center, women were earning approximately $0.83-$0.84 for every $1.00 earned by their male counterparts in 2020. Accordingly, women would need to work an additional 42 days to receive compensation for earnings by men during that year. Moreover, these gaps exist with respect to race inequalities. For example, Black and Latinx women who are working full-time were reported to earn approximately $0.64 and $0.57, respectively, for every $1.00 compared with their white, non-Hispanic male counterparts. Striking, isn’t it?

Leanna M.W. Lui

The gender pay gap also affects physicians. A 2021 Medscape survey found that male physicians earn 35% more than female physicians. The biggest gap seems to be between male and female specialists, with men earning $376,000 and women $283,000.
 

Gender inequality and COVID-19

In addition to workplace responsibilities, women are more likely to take on unpaid positions in the informal care economy – examples of these tasks include cleaning, grocery shopping, and child care. In fact, the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the burden of unpaid care work among women, which often incurs a significant impact on their participation in the paid economy.

A study in the United States evaluating the impact of gender inequality during COVID-19 suggested that the rise in unemployment among women during this time may be related to decreased occupational flexibility. Accordingly, the closure of schools and caregiving facilities has translated into increased responsibilities as the informal caregiver, and a decreased ability to fulfill work obligations. Consequently, women may be overwhelmed and unable to maintain their employment status, are limited in their work opportunities, and/or are furloughed or passed over for promotions.
 

Gendered pay gaps affect mental health

A study by Platt and colleagues investigated the relationship between gendered wage gaps and gendered disparities in depression and anxiety disorders. Researchers found that females with a lower income compared with their matched male counterparts were more likely to experience depression and generalized anxiety disorders (i.e., they were 2.4 times more likely to experience depression and 4 times more likely to experience anxiety), while women who earned more than men did not report a significant difference in depression there were reduced gaps in the prevalence of anxiety disorders. As such, it has been suggested that wage gap inequalities are a contributing factor to gendered mental health disparities.

Reduced pay is not only a signifier of reduced returns on human capital. It may also have implications for one’s role in the care economy (e.g., greater time allocation as a result of reduced return), and may result in a higher likelihood for relocation as it relates to a partner’s work, overqualification for a position, inflexible work schedules, and reduced work autonomy.

Wage inequalities may act as a proxy for workplace inequalities such as promotions, prestigious projects, limited upward mobility, and internalized negative workplace experiences, all of which may contribute to increased sleep loss, stress, and related mental health stressors.

One might say, “A few cents, so what?” In addition to income itself, there’s a broader theme at play, which is gender discrimination and inequality. We should encourage conversations around the gender pay gap and develop strategies to combat this economic and social disparity.
 

Ms. Lui completed an HBSc global health specialist degree at the University of Toronto, where she is now an MSc candidate. She has received income from Braxia Scientific Corp. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

According to an analysis by the Pew Research Center and a report by the National Women’s Law Center, women were earning approximately $0.83-$0.84 for every $1.00 earned by their male counterparts in 2020. Accordingly, women would need to work an additional 42 days to receive compensation for earnings by men during that year. Moreover, these gaps exist with respect to race inequalities. For example, Black and Latinx women who are working full-time were reported to earn approximately $0.64 and $0.57, respectively, for every $1.00 compared with their white, non-Hispanic male counterparts. Striking, isn’t it?

Leanna M.W. Lui

The gender pay gap also affects physicians. A 2021 Medscape survey found that male physicians earn 35% more than female physicians. The biggest gap seems to be between male and female specialists, with men earning $376,000 and women $283,000.
 

Gender inequality and COVID-19

In addition to workplace responsibilities, women are more likely to take on unpaid positions in the informal care economy – examples of these tasks include cleaning, grocery shopping, and child care. In fact, the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the burden of unpaid care work among women, which often incurs a significant impact on their participation in the paid economy.

A study in the United States evaluating the impact of gender inequality during COVID-19 suggested that the rise in unemployment among women during this time may be related to decreased occupational flexibility. Accordingly, the closure of schools and caregiving facilities has translated into increased responsibilities as the informal caregiver, and a decreased ability to fulfill work obligations. Consequently, women may be overwhelmed and unable to maintain their employment status, are limited in their work opportunities, and/or are furloughed or passed over for promotions.
 

Gendered pay gaps affect mental health

A study by Platt and colleagues investigated the relationship between gendered wage gaps and gendered disparities in depression and anxiety disorders. Researchers found that females with a lower income compared with their matched male counterparts were more likely to experience depression and generalized anxiety disorders (i.e., they were 2.4 times more likely to experience depression and 4 times more likely to experience anxiety), while women who earned more than men did not report a significant difference in depression there were reduced gaps in the prevalence of anxiety disorders. As such, it has been suggested that wage gap inequalities are a contributing factor to gendered mental health disparities.

Reduced pay is not only a signifier of reduced returns on human capital. It may also have implications for one’s role in the care economy (e.g., greater time allocation as a result of reduced return), and may result in a higher likelihood for relocation as it relates to a partner’s work, overqualification for a position, inflexible work schedules, and reduced work autonomy.

Wage inequalities may act as a proxy for workplace inequalities such as promotions, prestigious projects, limited upward mobility, and internalized negative workplace experiences, all of which may contribute to increased sleep loss, stress, and related mental health stressors.

One might say, “A few cents, so what?” In addition to income itself, there’s a broader theme at play, which is gender discrimination and inequality. We should encourage conversations around the gender pay gap and develop strategies to combat this economic and social disparity.
 

Ms. Lui completed an HBSc global health specialist degree at the University of Toronto, where she is now an MSc candidate. She has received income from Braxia Scientific Corp. A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Use ProPublica
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article