Cutis

To the Editor:

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication seen most often with bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. With these therapies, functional lymphoid cells are transferred from an immunocompetent donor into a nongenetically identical recipient, or "host." Because of the allogeneic nature of these transplants, the transplanted lymphoid cells have a high potential to recognize and treat the host's cells as foreign, and the resultant clinical and pathologic picture is that of GVHD. The primary organ systems affected in this immune response are the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and hepatobiliary system.^1,2 Cutaneous manifestations are by far the most common.³

Although notable gains have been made in elucidating the causes, risk factors, and mechanisms that result in the clinical picture of GVHD, gaps in our knowledge and understanding still exist. Our patient represents a unique case of unilateral GVHD occurring along Blaschko lines, which has important implications for both recognizing and understanding the pathogenesis of GVHD.

A 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma and received various chemotherapy regimens over the next 4 years. Unfortunately, her disease progressed despite treatment. At 39 years of age, she underwent a nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from a single HLA-mismatched sibling. She was placed on prednisone and cyclosporine for immunosuppression. High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis also was initiated given her history of zoster affecting the right C3 dermatome. Successful engraftment was achieved, with molecular studies showing 100% of cells following transplantation were of donor origin. Restaging at 1 and 2 years following transplantation found her to be in complete remission.

At 2 years following transplantation, she began a slow taper of immunosuppressive medications. She was successfully weaned off prednisone and continued to gradually reduce the cyclosporine dose. Toward the end of the cyclosporine taper 3 months later, she developed a pruritic eruption on the left proximal arm.

She was seen in a bone marrow transplant clinic 4 weeks after the rash developed. On examination, she had multiple, violaceous, lichenoid papules coalescing into linear bandlike plaques. One plaque extended along the left upper arm and 2 others encircled the left hemithorax, respecting the midline. She was treated empirically for zoster with valacyclovir 1 g 3 times daily based on the presumed dermatomal distribution of the eruption. Despite treatment, the rash progressed, and she developed fever. Eight days later, she was admitted with concern for disseminated zoster (Figure). Viral tissue cultures and polymerase chain reaction analysis of the lesions were negative for varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2. Biopsies of skin lesions on the arm and trunk were both consistent with GVHD. 

Given the clinical history, characteristic lesion morphology, and distinct linear distribution along with histopathological confirmation, a diagnosis of GVHD along Blaschko lines was made. Recognizing the cause to be immunogenic rather than infectious, immunosuppressive medications were started. In addition to increasing the prednisone and cyclosporine back to therapeutic levels, she received weekly methylprednisolone. With treatment, she showed gradual but marked improvement.

Six cases of linear GVHD have occurred as an isotopic response along dermatomes previously affected by varicella-zoster virus.^4-8 These cases give credence to the idea that a cutaneous viral infection may alter the skin through unknown mechanisms, predisposing it to become affected by GVHD. Notably, this phenomenon occurred despite absence of a persistent viral genome when assessed using polymerase chain reaction analysis.⁴

An additional 3 cases of GVHD occurring in a dermatomal distribution without any prior infections in those areas have been reported.^9,10 Of note, 2 of 3 patients did have episodes of zoster occur at other sites following transplantation and did not develop GVHD symptoms in any of those locations.⁹ Interestingly, controversy exists as to whether the distribution of these lesions was dermatomal or followed Blaschko lines.¹¹

Two cases of linear GVHD have been reported in which lesions were identified as occurring along Blaschko lines.^12,13 The lines of Blaschko, first described in 1901, correspond to cellular migration patterns during embryological development.¹⁴ Postzygotic mutations causing epidermal cell mosaicism may result in skin disorders occurring in segmental areas defined by the Blaschko lines.^15-17 Accordingly, the Blaschko-linear pattern in GVHD suggests cellular mosaicism as the etiology in this case. Although the host's immune system develops immunotolerance to both cellular lineages during maturation, transplanted lymphoid cells from a nongenetically identical sibling may identify just one of the cell lines as nonself, producing a selective pattern of GVHD¹⁸ confined to the distribution of the genetically disparate cell line, which occurs along the lines of Blaschko in the skin. Candidate genes for mutations that would produce a mosaic following transplant GVHD include any of the 25 to 30 known minor histocompatibility antigens (or any of the several hundred yet to be found).¹⁹ Although well established for monogenic dominant disorders, in 2007 it was recognized that a postzygotic mutation can cause many complex polygenetic disorders, including GVHD, to manifest in a limited segmental pattern. This understanding, along with retrospective case review, has brought into question previously reported "dermatomal" or "zosteriform" presentations of GVHD, asserting that the linear patterns were misidentified and thus inappropriately attributed to a postviral response.²⁰ Recognition of the Blaschko-linear distribution holds significance in both identifying lesion etiology and understanding disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Our patient illustrates a case of a Blaschko-linear GVHD. The distinctive pattern of her physical findings strongly favored epidermal cell mosaicism as the etiology of her disease. More than just a phenotypically unique case, it provided further insight into the complex etiology underlying GVHD and iterated the basic concepts of Blaschko lines and genetic alterations in development.

To the Editor:

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication seen most often with bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. With these therapies, functional lymphoid cells are transferred from an immunocompetent donor into a nongenetically identical recipient, or "host." Because of the allogeneic nature of these transplants, the transplanted lymphoid cells have a high potential to recognize and treat the host's cells as foreign, and the resultant clinical and pathologic picture is that of GVHD. The primary organ systems affected in this immune response are the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and hepatobiliary system.^1,2 Cutaneous manifestations are by far the most common.³

Although notable gains have been made in elucidating the causes, risk factors, and mechanisms that result in the clinical picture of GVHD, gaps in our knowledge and understanding still exist. Our patient represents a unique case of unilateral GVHD occurring along Blaschko lines, which has important implications for both recognizing and understanding the pathogenesis of GVHD.

A 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma and received various chemotherapy regimens over the next 4 years. Unfortunately, her disease progressed despite treatment. At 39 years of age, she underwent a nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from a single HLA-mismatched sibling. She was placed on prednisone and cyclosporine for immunosuppression. High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis also was initiated given her history of zoster affecting the right C3 dermatome. Successful engraftment was achieved, with molecular studies showing 100% of cells following transplantation were of donor origin. Restaging at 1 and 2 years following transplantation found her to be in complete remission.

At 2 years following transplantation, she began a slow taper of immunosuppressive medications. She was successfully weaned off prednisone and continued to gradually reduce the cyclosporine dose. Toward the end of the cyclosporine taper 3 months later, she developed a pruritic eruption on the left proximal arm.

She was seen in a bone marrow transplant clinic 4 weeks after the rash developed. On examination, she had multiple, violaceous, lichenoid papules coalescing into linear bandlike plaques. One plaque extended along the left upper arm and 2 others encircled the left hemithorax, respecting the midline. She was treated empirically for zoster with valacyclovir 1 g 3 times daily based on the presumed dermatomal distribution of the eruption. Despite treatment, the rash progressed, and she developed fever. Eight days later, she was admitted with concern for disseminated zoster (Figure). Viral tissue cultures and polymerase chain reaction analysis of the lesions were negative for varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2. Biopsies of skin lesions on the arm and trunk were both consistent with GVHD. 

Given the clinical history, characteristic lesion morphology, and distinct linear distribution along with histopathological confirmation, a diagnosis of GVHD along Blaschko lines was made. Recognizing the cause to be immunogenic rather than infectious, immunosuppressive medications were started. In addition to increasing the prednisone and cyclosporine back to therapeutic levels, she received weekly methylprednisolone. With treatment, she showed gradual but marked improvement.

Six cases of linear GVHD have occurred as an isotopic response along dermatomes previously affected by varicella-zoster virus.^4-8 These cases give credence to the idea that a cutaneous viral infection may alter the skin through unknown mechanisms, predisposing it to become affected by GVHD. Notably, this phenomenon occurred despite absence of a persistent viral genome when assessed using polymerase chain reaction analysis.⁴

An additional 3 cases of GVHD occurring in a dermatomal distribution without any prior infections in those areas have been reported.^9,10 Of note, 2 of 3 patients did have episodes of zoster occur at other sites following transplantation and did not develop GVHD symptoms in any of those locations.⁹ Interestingly, controversy exists as to whether the distribution of these lesions was dermatomal or followed Blaschko lines.¹¹

Two cases of linear GVHD have been reported in which lesions were identified as occurring along Blaschko lines.^12,13 The lines of Blaschko, first described in 1901, correspond to cellular migration patterns during embryological development.¹⁴ Postzygotic mutations causing epidermal cell mosaicism may result in skin disorders occurring in segmental areas defined by the Blaschko lines.^15-17 Accordingly, the Blaschko-linear pattern in GVHD suggests cellular mosaicism as the etiology in this case. Although the host's immune system develops immunotolerance to both cellular lineages during maturation, transplanted lymphoid cells from a nongenetically identical sibling may identify just one of the cell lines as nonself, producing a selective pattern of GVHD¹⁸ confined to the distribution of the genetically disparate cell line, which occurs along the lines of Blaschko in the skin. Candidate genes for mutations that would produce a mosaic following transplant GVHD include any of the 25 to 30 known minor histocompatibility antigens (or any of the several hundred yet to be found).¹⁹ Although well established for monogenic dominant disorders, in 2007 it was recognized that a postzygotic mutation can cause many complex polygenetic disorders, including GVHD, to manifest in a limited segmental pattern. This understanding, along with retrospective case review, has brought into question previously reported "dermatomal" or "zosteriform" presentations of GVHD, asserting that the linear patterns were misidentified and thus inappropriately attributed to a postviral response.²⁰ Recognition of the Blaschko-linear distribution holds significance in both identifying lesion etiology and understanding disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Our patient illustrates a case of a Blaschko-linear GVHD. The distinctive pattern of her physical findings strongly favored epidermal cell mosaicism as the etiology of her disease. More than just a phenotypically unique case, it provided further insight into the complex etiology underlying GVHD and iterated the basic concepts of Blaschko lines and genetic alterations in development.

To the Editor:

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common and serious complication seen most often with bone marrow transplantation and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. With these therapies, functional lymphoid cells are transferred from an immunocompetent donor into a nongenetically identical recipient, or "host." Because of the allogeneic nature of these transplants, the transplanted lymphoid cells have a high potential to recognize and treat the host's cells as foreign, and the resultant clinical and pathologic picture is that of GVHD. The primary organ systems affected in this immune response are the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and hepatobiliary system.^1,2 Cutaneous manifestations are by far the most common.³

Although notable gains have been made in elucidating the causes, risk factors, and mechanisms that result in the clinical picture of GVHD, gaps in our knowledge and understanding still exist. Our patient represents a unique case of unilateral GVHD occurring along Blaschko lines, which has important implications for both recognizing and understanding the pathogenesis of GVHD.

A 35-year-old woman was diagnosed with stage IV follicular lymphoma and received various chemotherapy regimens over the next 4 years. Unfortunately, her disease progressed despite treatment. At 39 years of age, she underwent a nonmyeloablative allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from a single HLA-mismatched sibling. She was placed on prednisone and cyclosporine for immunosuppression. High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis also was initiated given her history of zoster affecting the right C3 dermatome. Successful engraftment was achieved, with molecular studies showing 100% of cells following transplantation were of donor origin. Restaging at 1 and 2 years following transplantation found her to be in complete remission.

At 2 years following transplantation, she began a slow taper of immunosuppressive medications. She was successfully weaned off prednisone and continued to gradually reduce the cyclosporine dose. Toward the end of the cyclosporine taper 3 months later, she developed a pruritic eruption on the left proximal arm.

She was seen in a bone marrow transplant clinic 4 weeks after the rash developed. On examination, she had multiple, violaceous, lichenoid papules coalescing into linear bandlike plaques. One plaque extended along the left upper arm and 2 others encircled the left hemithorax, respecting the midline. She was treated empirically for zoster with valacyclovir 1 g 3 times daily based on the presumed dermatomal distribution of the eruption. Despite treatment, the rash progressed, and she developed fever. Eight days later, she was admitted with concern for disseminated zoster (Figure). Viral tissue cultures and polymerase chain reaction analysis of the lesions were negative for varicella-zoster virus and herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2. Biopsies of skin lesions on the arm and trunk were both consistent with GVHD. 

Given the clinical history, characteristic lesion morphology, and distinct linear distribution along with histopathological confirmation, a diagnosis of GVHD along Blaschko lines was made. Recognizing the cause to be immunogenic rather than infectious, immunosuppressive medications were started. In addition to increasing the prednisone and cyclosporine back to therapeutic levels, she received weekly methylprednisolone. With treatment, she showed gradual but marked improvement.

Six cases of linear GVHD have occurred as an isotopic response along dermatomes previously affected by varicella-zoster virus.^4-8 These cases give credence to the idea that a cutaneous viral infection may alter the skin through unknown mechanisms, predisposing it to become affected by GVHD. Notably, this phenomenon occurred despite absence of a persistent viral genome when assessed using polymerase chain reaction analysis.⁴

An additional 3 cases of GVHD occurring in a dermatomal distribution without any prior infections in those areas have been reported.^9,10 Of note, 2 of 3 patients did have episodes of zoster occur at other sites following transplantation and did not develop GVHD symptoms in any of those locations.⁹ Interestingly, controversy exists as to whether the distribution of these lesions was dermatomal or followed Blaschko lines.¹¹

Two cases of linear GVHD have been reported in which lesions were identified as occurring along Blaschko lines.^12,13 The lines of Blaschko, first described in 1901, correspond to cellular migration patterns during embryological development.¹⁴ Postzygotic mutations causing epidermal cell mosaicism may result in skin disorders occurring in segmental areas defined by the Blaschko lines.^15-17 Accordingly, the Blaschko-linear pattern in GVHD suggests cellular mosaicism as the etiology in this case. Although the host's immune system develops immunotolerance to both cellular lineages during maturation, transplanted lymphoid cells from a nongenetically identical sibling may identify just one of the cell lines as nonself, producing a selective pattern of GVHD¹⁸ confined to the distribution of the genetically disparate cell line, which occurs along the lines of Blaschko in the skin. Candidate genes for mutations that would produce a mosaic following transplant GVHD include any of the 25 to 30 known minor histocompatibility antigens (or any of the several hundred yet to be found).¹⁹ Although well established for monogenic dominant disorders, in 2007 it was recognized that a postzygotic mutation can cause many complex polygenetic disorders, including GVHD, to manifest in a limited segmental pattern. This understanding, along with retrospective case review, has brought into question previously reported "dermatomal" or "zosteriform" presentations of GVHD, asserting that the linear patterns were misidentified and thus inappropriately attributed to a postviral response.²⁰ Recognition of the Blaschko-linear distribution holds significance in both identifying lesion etiology and understanding disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Our patient illustrates a case of a Blaschko-linear GVHD. The distinctive pattern of her physical findings strongly favored epidermal cell mosaicism as the etiology of her disease. More than just a phenotypically unique case, it provided further insight into the complex etiology underlying GVHD and iterated the basic concepts of Blaschko lines and genetic alterations in development.

Myth: Acne only occurs in teenagers

Acne typically is associated with teenagers and puberty, and many adult patients may not be aware that acne can persist beyond adolescence or even develop for the first time in adulthood. As the prevalence of adults with acne increases, it is important to educate this population about factors associated with postadolescent acne development and let them know that effective treatments are available.

There are 2 types of adult acne: persistent acne, which refers to adolescent acne that continues beyond 25 years of age, and late-onset acne, which develops for the first time after 25 years of age. Adult acne generally is mild to moderate in severity and may be refractory to treatment. Unlike adolescent acne, which is more prominent in adolescent boys and manifests as the more severe forms of the disease, adult acne primarily affects women and is more inflammatory in nature, making these patients more susceptible to scarring. In one study, acne prevalence among 1055 adult participants (age range, 20–60 years) was estimated at 61.5%; however, only 36.8% were aware of their condition and only 25% sought treatment. The most commonly affected area was the malar region, which differs from acne seen in teenagers. In addition to the cheeks, adult acne generally is more prominent on the lower chin, jawline, and neck, and lesions more commonly present as closed comedones.

Fluctuating hormone levels are a common cause of adult acne, particularly in women during menses or pregnancy, menopause, or perimenopause; women also may experience breakouts after starting or discontinuing birth control pills. Acne flare-ups in adults also have been linked to chronic stress, family history, hair and skin care products, medication side effects, undiagnosed medical conditions, steroid use, increased calorie intake, whole and fat-reduced milk consumption, and tobacco smoking. Adult acne also has been found to be associated with other dermatologic conditions including hirsutism, alopecia, and seborrhea.

Early diagnosis and treatment of adult acne is crucial to ensure good cosmetic outcomes and minimize disease burden. When treating adult acne, particularly in women, dermatologists should consider a variety of factors that set this condition apart from adolescent acne, including the predisposition of older skin to irritation, possible slow response to treatment, a high likelihood of good adherence to treatment, and the psychosocial impact of acne in the adult population. In adult women, it also is important to consider whether patients are of childbearing age when selecting a treatment. Patients also should be encouraged to read the labels on their personal care products to ensure they are noncomedogenic and will not clog pores.

Myth: Acne only occurs in teenagers

Acne typically is associated with teenagers and puberty, and many adult patients may not be aware that acne can persist beyond adolescence or even develop for the first time in adulthood. As the prevalence of adults with acne increases, it is important to educate this population about factors associated with postadolescent acne development and let them know that effective treatments are available.

There are 2 types of adult acne: persistent acne, which refers to adolescent acne that continues beyond 25 years of age, and late-onset acne, which develops for the first time after 25 years of age. Adult acne generally is mild to moderate in severity and may be refractory to treatment. Unlike adolescent acne, which is more prominent in adolescent boys and manifests as the more severe forms of the disease, adult acne primarily affects women and is more inflammatory in nature, making these patients more susceptible to scarring. In one study, acne prevalence among 1055 adult participants (age range, 20–60 years) was estimated at 61.5%; however, only 36.8% were aware of their condition and only 25% sought treatment. The most commonly affected area was the malar region, which differs from acne seen in teenagers. In addition to the cheeks, adult acne generally is more prominent on the lower chin, jawline, and neck, and lesions more commonly present as closed comedones.

Fluctuating hormone levels are a common cause of adult acne, particularly in women during menses or pregnancy, menopause, or perimenopause; women also may experience breakouts after starting or discontinuing birth control pills. Acne flare-ups in adults also have been linked to chronic stress, family history, hair and skin care products, medication side effects, undiagnosed medical conditions, steroid use, increased calorie intake, whole and fat-reduced milk consumption, and tobacco smoking. Adult acne also has been found to be associated with other dermatologic conditions including hirsutism, alopecia, and seborrhea.

Early diagnosis and treatment of adult acne is crucial to ensure good cosmetic outcomes and minimize disease burden. When treating adult acne, particularly in women, dermatologists should consider a variety of factors that set this condition apart from adolescent acne, including the predisposition of older skin to irritation, possible slow response to treatment, a high likelihood of good adherence to treatment, and the psychosocial impact of acne in the adult population. In adult women, it also is important to consider whether patients are of childbearing age when selecting a treatment. Patients also should be encouraged to read the labels on their personal care products to ensure they are noncomedogenic and will not clog pores.

Myth: Acne only occurs in teenagers

Acne typically is associated with teenagers and puberty, and many adult patients may not be aware that acne can persist beyond adolescence or even develop for the first time in adulthood. As the prevalence of adults with acne increases, it is important to educate this population about factors associated with postadolescent acne development and let them know that effective treatments are available.

There are 2 types of adult acne: persistent acne, which refers to adolescent acne that continues beyond 25 years of age, and late-onset acne, which develops for the first time after 25 years of age. Adult acne generally is mild to moderate in severity and may be refractory to treatment. Unlike adolescent acne, which is more prominent in adolescent boys and manifests as the more severe forms of the disease, adult acne primarily affects women and is more inflammatory in nature, making these patients more susceptible to scarring. In one study, acne prevalence among 1055 adult participants (age range, 20–60 years) was estimated at 61.5%; however, only 36.8% were aware of their condition and only 25% sought treatment. The most commonly affected area was the malar region, which differs from acne seen in teenagers. In addition to the cheeks, adult acne generally is more prominent on the lower chin, jawline, and neck, and lesions more commonly present as closed comedones.

Fluctuating hormone levels are a common cause of adult acne, particularly in women during menses or pregnancy, menopause, or perimenopause; women also may experience breakouts after starting or discontinuing birth control pills. Acne flare-ups in adults also have been linked to chronic stress, family history, hair and skin care products, medication side effects, undiagnosed medical conditions, steroid use, increased calorie intake, whole and fat-reduced milk consumption, and tobacco smoking. Adult acne also has been found to be associated with other dermatologic conditions including hirsutism, alopecia, and seborrhea.

Early diagnosis and treatment of adult acne is crucial to ensure good cosmetic outcomes and minimize disease burden. When treating adult acne, particularly in women, dermatologists should consider a variety of factors that set this condition apart from adolescent acne, including the predisposition of older skin to irritation, possible slow response to treatment, a high likelihood of good adherence to treatment, and the psychosocial impact of acne in the adult population. In adult women, it also is important to consider whether patients are of childbearing age when selecting a treatment. Patients also should be encouraged to read the labels on their personal care products to ensure they are noncomedogenic and will not clog pores.