User login
CCJM delivers practical clinical articles relevant to internists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, and other specialists, all written by known experts.
Copyright © 2019 Cleveland Clinic. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the disclaimer and privacy policy.
gambling
compulsive behaviors
ammunition
assault rifle
black jack
Boko Haram
bondage
child abuse
cocaine
Daech
drug paraphernalia
explosion
gun
human trafficking
ISIL
ISIS
Islamic caliphate
Islamic state
mixed martial arts
MMA
molestation
national rifle association
NRA
nsfw
pedophile
pedophilia
poker
porn
pornography
psychedelic drug
recreational drug
sex slave rings
slot machine
terrorism
terrorist
Texas hold 'em
UFC
substance abuse
abuseed
abuseer
abusees
abuseing
abusely
abuses
aeolus
aeolused
aeoluser
aeoluses
aeolusing
aeolusly
aeoluss
ahole
aholeed
aholeer
aholees
aholeing
aholely
aholes
alcohol
alcoholed
alcoholer
alcoholes
alcoholing
alcoholly
alcohols
allman
allmaned
allmaner
allmanes
allmaning
allmanly
allmans
alted
altes
alting
altly
alts
analed
analer
anales
analing
anally
analprobe
analprobeed
analprobeer
analprobees
analprobeing
analprobely
analprobes
anals
anilingus
anilingused
anilinguser
anilinguses
anilingusing
anilingusly
anilinguss
anus
anused
anuser
anuses
anusing
anusly
anuss
areola
areolaed
areolaer
areolaes
areolaing
areolaly
areolas
areole
areoleed
areoleer
areolees
areoleing
areolely
areoles
arian
arianed
arianer
arianes
arianing
arianly
arians
aryan
aryaned
aryaner
aryanes
aryaning
aryanly
aryans
asiaed
asiaer
asiaes
asiaing
asialy
asias
ass
ass hole
ass lick
ass licked
ass licker
ass lickes
ass licking
ass lickly
ass licks
assbang
assbanged
assbangeded
assbangeder
assbangedes
assbangeding
assbangedly
assbangeds
assbanger
assbanges
assbanging
assbangly
assbangs
assbangsed
assbangser
assbangses
assbangsing
assbangsly
assbangss
assed
asser
asses
assesed
asseser
asseses
assesing
assesly
assess
assfuck
assfucked
assfucker
assfuckered
assfuckerer
assfuckeres
assfuckering
assfuckerly
assfuckers
assfuckes
assfucking
assfuckly
assfucks
asshat
asshated
asshater
asshates
asshating
asshatly
asshats
assholeed
assholeer
assholees
assholeing
assholely
assholes
assholesed
assholeser
assholeses
assholesing
assholesly
assholess
assing
assly
assmaster
assmastered
assmasterer
assmasteres
assmastering
assmasterly
assmasters
assmunch
assmunched
assmuncher
assmunches
assmunching
assmunchly
assmunchs
asss
asswipe
asswipeed
asswipeer
asswipees
asswipeing
asswipely
asswipes
asswipesed
asswipeser
asswipeses
asswipesing
asswipesly
asswipess
azz
azzed
azzer
azzes
azzing
azzly
azzs
babeed
babeer
babees
babeing
babely
babes
babesed
babeser
babeses
babesing
babesly
babess
ballsac
ballsaced
ballsacer
ballsaces
ballsacing
ballsack
ballsacked
ballsacker
ballsackes
ballsacking
ballsackly
ballsacks
ballsacly
ballsacs
ballsed
ballser
ballses
ballsing
ballsly
ballss
barf
barfed
barfer
barfes
barfing
barfly
barfs
bastard
bastarded
bastarder
bastardes
bastarding
bastardly
bastards
bastardsed
bastardser
bastardses
bastardsing
bastardsly
bastardss
bawdy
bawdyed
bawdyer
bawdyes
bawdying
bawdyly
bawdys
beaner
beanered
beanerer
beaneres
beanering
beanerly
beaners
beardedclam
beardedclamed
beardedclamer
beardedclames
beardedclaming
beardedclamly
beardedclams
beastiality
beastialityed
beastialityer
beastialityes
beastialitying
beastialityly
beastialitys
beatch
beatched
beatcher
beatches
beatching
beatchly
beatchs
beater
beatered
beaterer
beateres
beatering
beaterly
beaters
beered
beerer
beeres
beering
beerly
beeyotch
beeyotched
beeyotcher
beeyotches
beeyotching
beeyotchly
beeyotchs
beotch
beotched
beotcher
beotches
beotching
beotchly
beotchs
biatch
biatched
biatcher
biatches
biatching
biatchly
biatchs
big tits
big titsed
big titser
big titses
big titsing
big titsly
big titss
bigtits
bigtitsed
bigtitser
bigtitses
bigtitsing
bigtitsly
bigtitss
bimbo
bimboed
bimboer
bimboes
bimboing
bimboly
bimbos
bisexualed
bisexualer
bisexuales
bisexualing
bisexually
bisexuals
bitch
bitched
bitcheded
bitcheder
bitchedes
bitcheding
bitchedly
bitcheds
bitcher
bitches
bitchesed
bitcheser
bitcheses
bitchesing
bitchesly
bitchess
bitching
bitchly
bitchs
bitchy
bitchyed
bitchyer
bitchyes
bitchying
bitchyly
bitchys
bleached
bleacher
bleaches
bleaching
bleachly
bleachs
blow job
blow jobed
blow jober
blow jobes
blow jobing
blow jobly
blow jobs
blowed
blower
blowes
blowing
blowjob
blowjobed
blowjober
blowjobes
blowjobing
blowjobly
blowjobs
blowjobsed
blowjobser
blowjobses
blowjobsing
blowjobsly
blowjobss
blowly
blows
boink
boinked
boinker
boinkes
boinking
boinkly
boinks
bollock
bollocked
bollocker
bollockes
bollocking
bollockly
bollocks
bollocksed
bollockser
bollockses
bollocksing
bollocksly
bollockss
bollok
bolloked
bolloker
bollokes
bolloking
bollokly
bolloks
boner
bonered
bonerer
boneres
bonering
bonerly
boners
bonersed
bonerser
bonerses
bonersing
bonersly
bonerss
bong
bonged
bonger
bonges
bonging
bongly
bongs
boob
boobed
boober
boobes
boobies
boobiesed
boobieser
boobieses
boobiesing
boobiesly
boobiess
boobing
boobly
boobs
boobsed
boobser
boobses
boobsing
boobsly
boobss
booby
boobyed
boobyer
boobyes
boobying
boobyly
boobys
booger
boogered
boogerer
boogeres
boogering
boogerly
boogers
bookie
bookieed
bookieer
bookiees
bookieing
bookiely
bookies
bootee
booteeed
booteeer
booteees
booteeing
booteely
bootees
bootie
bootieed
bootieer
bootiees
bootieing
bootiely
booties
booty
bootyed
bootyer
bootyes
bootying
bootyly
bootys
boozeed
boozeer
boozees
boozeing
boozely
boozer
boozered
boozerer
boozeres
boozering
boozerly
boozers
boozes
boozy
boozyed
boozyer
boozyes
boozying
boozyly
boozys
bosomed
bosomer
bosomes
bosoming
bosomly
bosoms
bosomy
bosomyed
bosomyer
bosomyes
bosomying
bosomyly
bosomys
bugger
buggered
buggerer
buggeres
buggering
buggerly
buggers
bukkake
bukkakeed
bukkakeer
bukkakees
bukkakeing
bukkakely
bukkakes
bull shit
bull shited
bull shiter
bull shites
bull shiting
bull shitly
bull shits
bullshit
bullshited
bullshiter
bullshites
bullshiting
bullshitly
bullshits
bullshitsed
bullshitser
bullshitses
bullshitsing
bullshitsly
bullshitss
bullshitted
bullshitteded
bullshitteder
bullshittedes
bullshitteding
bullshittedly
bullshitteds
bullturds
bullturdsed
bullturdser
bullturdses
bullturdsing
bullturdsly
bullturdss
bung
bunged
bunger
bunges
bunging
bungly
bungs
busty
bustyed
bustyer
bustyes
bustying
bustyly
bustys
butt
butt fuck
butt fucked
butt fucker
butt fuckes
butt fucking
butt fuckly
butt fucks
butted
buttes
buttfuck
buttfucked
buttfucker
buttfuckered
buttfuckerer
buttfuckeres
buttfuckering
buttfuckerly
buttfuckers
buttfuckes
buttfucking
buttfuckly
buttfucks
butting
buttly
buttplug
buttpluged
buttpluger
buttpluges
buttpluging
buttplugly
buttplugs
butts
caca
cacaed
cacaer
cacaes
cacaing
cacaly
cacas
cahone
cahoneed
cahoneer
cahonees
cahoneing
cahonely
cahones
cameltoe
cameltoeed
cameltoeer
cameltoees
cameltoeing
cameltoely
cameltoes
carpetmuncher
carpetmunchered
carpetmuncherer
carpetmuncheres
carpetmunchering
carpetmuncherly
carpetmunchers
cawk
cawked
cawker
cawkes
cawking
cawkly
cawks
chinc
chinced
chincer
chinces
chincing
chincly
chincs
chincsed
chincser
chincses
chincsing
chincsly
chincss
chink
chinked
chinker
chinkes
chinking
chinkly
chinks
chode
chodeed
chodeer
chodees
chodeing
chodely
chodes
chodesed
chodeser
chodeses
chodesing
chodesly
chodess
clit
clited
cliter
clites
cliting
clitly
clitoris
clitorised
clitoriser
clitorises
clitorising
clitorisly
clitoriss
clitorus
clitorused
clitoruser
clitoruses
clitorusing
clitorusly
clitoruss
clits
clitsed
clitser
clitses
clitsing
clitsly
clitss
clitty
clittyed
clittyer
clittyes
clittying
clittyly
clittys
cocain
cocaine
cocained
cocaineed
cocaineer
cocainees
cocaineing
cocainely
cocainer
cocaines
cocaining
cocainly
cocains
cock
cock sucker
cock suckered
cock suckerer
cock suckeres
cock suckering
cock suckerly
cock suckers
cockblock
cockblocked
cockblocker
cockblockes
cockblocking
cockblockly
cockblocks
cocked
cocker
cockes
cockholster
cockholstered
cockholsterer
cockholsteres
cockholstering
cockholsterly
cockholsters
cocking
cockknocker
cockknockered
cockknockerer
cockknockeres
cockknockering
cockknockerly
cockknockers
cockly
cocks
cocksed
cockser
cockses
cocksing
cocksly
cocksmoker
cocksmokered
cocksmokerer
cocksmokeres
cocksmokering
cocksmokerly
cocksmokers
cockss
cocksucker
cocksuckered
cocksuckerer
cocksuckeres
cocksuckering
cocksuckerly
cocksuckers
coital
coitaled
coitaler
coitales
coitaling
coitally
coitals
commie
commieed
commieer
commiees
commieing
commiely
commies
condomed
condomer
condomes
condoming
condomly
condoms
coon
cooned
cooner
coones
cooning
coonly
coons
coonsed
coonser
coonses
coonsing
coonsly
coonss
corksucker
corksuckered
corksuckerer
corksuckeres
corksuckering
corksuckerly
corksuckers
cracked
crackwhore
crackwhoreed
crackwhoreer
crackwhorees
crackwhoreing
crackwhorely
crackwhores
crap
craped
craper
crapes
craping
craply
crappy
crappyed
crappyer
crappyes
crappying
crappyly
crappys
cum
cumed
cumer
cumes
cuming
cumly
cummin
cummined
cumminer
cummines
cumming
cumminged
cumminger
cumminges
cumminging
cummingly
cummings
cummining
cumminly
cummins
cums
cumshot
cumshoted
cumshoter
cumshotes
cumshoting
cumshotly
cumshots
cumshotsed
cumshotser
cumshotses
cumshotsing
cumshotsly
cumshotss
cumslut
cumsluted
cumsluter
cumslutes
cumsluting
cumslutly
cumsluts
cumstain
cumstained
cumstainer
cumstaines
cumstaining
cumstainly
cumstains
cunilingus
cunilingused
cunilinguser
cunilinguses
cunilingusing
cunilingusly
cunilinguss
cunnilingus
cunnilingused
cunnilinguser
cunnilinguses
cunnilingusing
cunnilingusly
cunnilinguss
cunny
cunnyed
cunnyer
cunnyes
cunnying
cunnyly
cunnys
cunt
cunted
cunter
cuntes
cuntface
cuntfaceed
cuntfaceer
cuntfacees
cuntfaceing
cuntfacely
cuntfaces
cunthunter
cunthuntered
cunthunterer
cunthunteres
cunthuntering
cunthunterly
cunthunters
cunting
cuntlick
cuntlicked
cuntlicker
cuntlickered
cuntlickerer
cuntlickeres
cuntlickering
cuntlickerly
cuntlickers
cuntlickes
cuntlicking
cuntlickly
cuntlicks
cuntly
cunts
cuntsed
cuntser
cuntses
cuntsing
cuntsly
cuntss
dago
dagoed
dagoer
dagoes
dagoing
dagoly
dagos
dagosed
dagoser
dagoses
dagosing
dagosly
dagoss
dammit
dammited
dammiter
dammites
dammiting
dammitly
dammits
damn
damned
damneded
damneder
damnedes
damneding
damnedly
damneds
damner
damnes
damning
damnit
damnited
damniter
damnites
damniting
damnitly
damnits
damnly
damns
dick
dickbag
dickbaged
dickbager
dickbages
dickbaging
dickbagly
dickbags
dickdipper
dickdippered
dickdipperer
dickdipperes
dickdippering
dickdipperly
dickdippers
dicked
dicker
dickes
dickface
dickfaceed
dickfaceer
dickfacees
dickfaceing
dickfacely
dickfaces
dickflipper
dickflippered
dickflipperer
dickflipperes
dickflippering
dickflipperly
dickflippers
dickhead
dickheaded
dickheader
dickheades
dickheading
dickheadly
dickheads
dickheadsed
dickheadser
dickheadses
dickheadsing
dickheadsly
dickheadss
dicking
dickish
dickished
dickisher
dickishes
dickishing
dickishly
dickishs
dickly
dickripper
dickrippered
dickripperer
dickripperes
dickrippering
dickripperly
dickrippers
dicks
dicksipper
dicksippered
dicksipperer
dicksipperes
dicksippering
dicksipperly
dicksippers
dickweed
dickweeded
dickweeder
dickweedes
dickweeding
dickweedly
dickweeds
dickwhipper
dickwhippered
dickwhipperer
dickwhipperes
dickwhippering
dickwhipperly
dickwhippers
dickzipper
dickzippered
dickzipperer
dickzipperes
dickzippering
dickzipperly
dickzippers
diddle
diddleed
diddleer
diddlees
diddleing
diddlely
diddles
dike
dikeed
dikeer
dikees
dikeing
dikely
dikes
dildo
dildoed
dildoer
dildoes
dildoing
dildoly
dildos
dildosed
dildoser
dildoses
dildosing
dildosly
dildoss
diligaf
diligafed
diligafer
diligafes
diligafing
diligafly
diligafs
dillweed
dillweeded
dillweeder
dillweedes
dillweeding
dillweedly
dillweeds
dimwit
dimwited
dimwiter
dimwites
dimwiting
dimwitly
dimwits
dingle
dingleed
dingleer
dinglees
dingleing
dinglely
dingles
dipship
dipshiped
dipshiper
dipshipes
dipshiping
dipshiply
dipships
dizzyed
dizzyer
dizzyes
dizzying
dizzyly
dizzys
doggiestyleed
doggiestyleer
doggiestylees
doggiestyleing
doggiestylely
doggiestyles
doggystyleed
doggystyleer
doggystylees
doggystyleing
doggystylely
doggystyles
dong
donged
donger
donges
donging
dongly
dongs
doofus
doofused
doofuser
doofuses
doofusing
doofusly
doofuss
doosh
dooshed
doosher
dooshes
dooshing
dooshly
dooshs
dopeyed
dopeyer
dopeyes
dopeying
dopeyly
dopeys
douchebag
douchebaged
douchebager
douchebages
douchebaging
douchebagly
douchebags
douchebagsed
douchebagser
douchebagses
douchebagsing
douchebagsly
douchebagss
doucheed
doucheer
douchees
doucheing
douchely
douches
douchey
doucheyed
doucheyer
doucheyes
doucheying
doucheyly
doucheys
drunk
drunked
drunker
drunkes
drunking
drunkly
drunks
dumass
dumassed
dumasser
dumasses
dumassing
dumassly
dumasss
dumbass
dumbassed
dumbasser
dumbasses
dumbassesed
dumbasseser
dumbasseses
dumbassesing
dumbassesly
dumbassess
dumbassing
dumbassly
dumbasss
dummy
dummyed
dummyer
dummyes
dummying
dummyly
dummys
dyke
dykeed
dykeer
dykees
dykeing
dykely
dykes
dykesed
dykeser
dykeses
dykesing
dykesly
dykess
erotic
eroticed
eroticer
erotices
eroticing
eroticly
erotics
extacy
extacyed
extacyer
extacyes
extacying
extacyly
extacys
extasy
extasyed
extasyer
extasyes
extasying
extasyly
extasys
fack
facked
facker
fackes
facking
fackly
facks
fag
faged
fager
fages
fagg
fagged
faggeded
faggeder
faggedes
faggeding
faggedly
faggeds
fagger
fagges
fagging
faggit
faggited
faggiter
faggites
faggiting
faggitly
faggits
faggly
faggot
faggoted
faggoter
faggotes
faggoting
faggotly
faggots
faggs
faging
fagly
fagot
fagoted
fagoter
fagotes
fagoting
fagotly
fagots
fags
fagsed
fagser
fagses
fagsing
fagsly
fagss
faig
faiged
faiger
faiges
faiging
faigly
faigs
faigt
faigted
faigter
faigtes
faigting
faigtly
faigts
fannybandit
fannybandited
fannybanditer
fannybandites
fannybanditing
fannybanditly
fannybandits
farted
farter
fartes
farting
fartknocker
fartknockered
fartknockerer
fartknockeres
fartknockering
fartknockerly
fartknockers
fartly
farts
felch
felched
felcher
felchered
felcherer
felcheres
felchering
felcherly
felchers
felches
felching
felchinged
felchinger
felchinges
felchinging
felchingly
felchings
felchly
felchs
fellate
fellateed
fellateer
fellatees
fellateing
fellately
fellates
fellatio
fellatioed
fellatioer
fellatioes
fellatioing
fellatioly
fellatios
feltch
feltched
feltcher
feltchered
feltcherer
feltcheres
feltchering
feltcherly
feltchers
feltches
feltching
feltchly
feltchs
feom
feomed
feomer
feomes
feoming
feomly
feoms
fisted
fisteded
fisteder
fistedes
fisteding
fistedly
fisteds
fisting
fistinged
fistinger
fistinges
fistinging
fistingly
fistings
fisty
fistyed
fistyer
fistyes
fistying
fistyly
fistys
floozy
floozyed
floozyer
floozyes
floozying
floozyly
floozys
foad
foaded
foader
foades
foading
foadly
foads
fondleed
fondleer
fondlees
fondleing
fondlely
fondles
foobar
foobared
foobarer
foobares
foobaring
foobarly
foobars
freex
freexed
freexer
freexes
freexing
freexly
freexs
frigg
frigga
friggaed
friggaer
friggaes
friggaing
friggaly
friggas
frigged
frigger
frigges
frigging
friggly
friggs
fubar
fubared
fubarer
fubares
fubaring
fubarly
fubars
fuck
fuckass
fuckassed
fuckasser
fuckasses
fuckassing
fuckassly
fuckasss
fucked
fuckeded
fuckeder
fuckedes
fuckeding
fuckedly
fuckeds
fucker
fuckered
fuckerer
fuckeres
fuckering
fuckerly
fuckers
fuckes
fuckface
fuckfaceed
fuckfaceer
fuckfacees
fuckfaceing
fuckfacely
fuckfaces
fuckin
fuckined
fuckiner
fuckines
fucking
fuckinged
fuckinger
fuckinges
fuckinging
fuckingly
fuckings
fuckining
fuckinly
fuckins
fuckly
fucknugget
fucknuggeted
fucknuggeter
fucknuggetes
fucknuggeting
fucknuggetly
fucknuggets
fucknut
fucknuted
fucknuter
fucknutes
fucknuting
fucknutly
fucknuts
fuckoff
fuckoffed
fuckoffer
fuckoffes
fuckoffing
fuckoffly
fuckoffs
fucks
fucksed
fuckser
fuckses
fucksing
fucksly
fuckss
fucktard
fucktarded
fucktarder
fucktardes
fucktarding
fucktardly
fucktards
fuckup
fuckuped
fuckuper
fuckupes
fuckuping
fuckuply
fuckups
fuckwad
fuckwaded
fuckwader
fuckwades
fuckwading
fuckwadly
fuckwads
fuckwit
fuckwited
fuckwiter
fuckwites
fuckwiting
fuckwitly
fuckwits
fudgepacker
fudgepackered
fudgepackerer
fudgepackeres
fudgepackering
fudgepackerly
fudgepackers
fuk
fuked
fuker
fukes
fuking
fukly
fuks
fvck
fvcked
fvcker
fvckes
fvcking
fvckly
fvcks
fxck
fxcked
fxcker
fxckes
fxcking
fxckly
fxcks
gae
gaeed
gaeer
gaees
gaeing
gaely
gaes
gai
gaied
gaier
gaies
gaiing
gaily
gais
ganja
ganjaed
ganjaer
ganjaes
ganjaing
ganjaly
ganjas
gayed
gayer
gayes
gaying
gayly
gays
gaysed
gayser
gayses
gaysing
gaysly
gayss
gey
geyed
geyer
geyes
geying
geyly
geys
gfc
gfced
gfcer
gfces
gfcing
gfcly
gfcs
gfy
gfyed
gfyer
gfyes
gfying
gfyly
gfys
ghay
ghayed
ghayer
ghayes
ghaying
ghayly
ghays
ghey
gheyed
gheyer
gheyes
gheying
gheyly
gheys
gigolo
gigoloed
gigoloer
gigoloes
gigoloing
gigololy
gigolos
goatse
goatseed
goatseer
goatsees
goatseing
goatsely
goatses
godamn
godamned
godamner
godamnes
godamning
godamnit
godamnited
godamniter
godamnites
godamniting
godamnitly
godamnits
godamnly
godamns
goddam
goddamed
goddamer
goddames
goddaming
goddamly
goddammit
goddammited
goddammiter
goddammites
goddammiting
goddammitly
goddammits
goddamn
goddamned
goddamner
goddamnes
goddamning
goddamnly
goddamns
goddams
goldenshower
goldenshowered
goldenshowerer
goldenshoweres
goldenshowering
goldenshowerly
goldenshowers
gonad
gonaded
gonader
gonades
gonading
gonadly
gonads
gonadsed
gonadser
gonadses
gonadsing
gonadsly
gonadss
gook
gooked
gooker
gookes
gooking
gookly
gooks
gooksed
gookser
gookses
gooksing
gooksly
gookss
gringo
gringoed
gringoer
gringoes
gringoing
gringoly
gringos
gspot
gspoted
gspoter
gspotes
gspoting
gspotly
gspots
gtfo
gtfoed
gtfoer
gtfoes
gtfoing
gtfoly
gtfos
guido
guidoed
guidoer
guidoes
guidoing
guidoly
guidos
handjob
handjobed
handjober
handjobes
handjobing
handjobly
handjobs
hard on
hard oned
hard oner
hard ones
hard oning
hard only
hard ons
hardknight
hardknighted
hardknighter
hardknightes
hardknighting
hardknightly
hardknights
hebe
hebeed
hebeer
hebees
hebeing
hebely
hebes
heeb
heebed
heeber
heebes
heebing
heebly
heebs
hell
helled
heller
helles
helling
hellly
hells
hemp
hemped
hemper
hempes
hemping
hemply
hemps
heroined
heroiner
heroines
heroining
heroinly
heroins
herp
herped
herper
herpes
herpesed
herpeser
herpeses
herpesing
herpesly
herpess
herping
herply
herps
herpy
herpyed
herpyer
herpyes
herpying
herpyly
herpys
hitler
hitlered
hitlerer
hitleres
hitlering
hitlerly
hitlers
hived
hiver
hives
hiving
hivly
hivs
hobag
hobaged
hobager
hobages
hobaging
hobagly
hobags
homey
homeyed
homeyer
homeyes
homeying
homeyly
homeys
homo
homoed
homoer
homoes
homoey
homoeyed
homoeyer
homoeyes
homoeying
homoeyly
homoeys
homoing
homoly
homos
honky
honkyed
honkyer
honkyes
honkying
honkyly
honkys
hooch
hooched
hoocher
hooches
hooching
hoochly
hoochs
hookah
hookahed
hookaher
hookahes
hookahing
hookahly
hookahs
hooker
hookered
hookerer
hookeres
hookering
hookerly
hookers
hoor
hoored
hoorer
hoores
hooring
hoorly
hoors
hootch
hootched
hootcher
hootches
hootching
hootchly
hootchs
hooter
hootered
hooterer
hooteres
hootering
hooterly
hooters
hootersed
hooterser
hooterses
hootersing
hootersly
hooterss
horny
hornyed
hornyer
hornyes
hornying
hornyly
hornys
houstoned
houstoner
houstones
houstoning
houstonly
houstons
hump
humped
humpeded
humpeder
humpedes
humpeding
humpedly
humpeds
humper
humpes
humping
humpinged
humpinger
humpinges
humpinging
humpingly
humpings
humply
humps
husbanded
husbander
husbandes
husbanding
husbandly
husbands
hussy
hussyed
hussyer
hussyes
hussying
hussyly
hussys
hymened
hymener
hymenes
hymening
hymenly
hymens
inbred
inbreded
inbreder
inbredes
inbreding
inbredly
inbreds
incest
incested
incester
incestes
incesting
incestly
incests
injun
injuned
injuner
injunes
injuning
injunly
injuns
jackass
jackassed
jackasser
jackasses
jackassing
jackassly
jackasss
jackhole
jackholeed
jackholeer
jackholees
jackholeing
jackholely
jackholes
jackoff
jackoffed
jackoffer
jackoffes
jackoffing
jackoffly
jackoffs
jap
japed
japer
japes
japing
japly
japs
japsed
japser
japses
japsing
japsly
japss
jerkoff
jerkoffed
jerkoffer
jerkoffes
jerkoffing
jerkoffly
jerkoffs
jerks
jism
jismed
jismer
jismes
jisming
jismly
jisms
jiz
jized
jizer
jizes
jizing
jizly
jizm
jizmed
jizmer
jizmes
jizming
jizmly
jizms
jizs
jizz
jizzed
jizzeded
jizzeder
jizzedes
jizzeding
jizzedly
jizzeds
jizzer
jizzes
jizzing
jizzly
jizzs
junkie
junkieed
junkieer
junkiees
junkieing
junkiely
junkies
junky
junkyed
junkyer
junkyes
junkying
junkyly
junkys
kike
kikeed
kikeer
kikees
kikeing
kikely
kikes
kikesed
kikeser
kikeses
kikesing
kikesly
kikess
killed
killer
killes
killing
killly
kills
kinky
kinkyed
kinkyer
kinkyes
kinkying
kinkyly
kinkys
kkk
kkked
kkker
kkkes
kkking
kkkly
kkks
klan
klaned
klaner
klanes
klaning
klanly
klans
knobend
knobended
knobender
knobendes
knobending
knobendly
knobends
kooch
kooched
koocher
kooches
koochesed
koocheser
koocheses
koochesing
koochesly
koochess
kooching
koochly
koochs
kootch
kootched
kootcher
kootches
kootching
kootchly
kootchs
kraut
krauted
krauter
krautes
krauting
krautly
krauts
kyke
kykeed
kykeer
kykees
kykeing
kykely
kykes
lech
leched
lecher
leches
leching
lechly
lechs
leper
lepered
leperer
leperes
lepering
leperly
lepers
lesbiansed
lesbianser
lesbianses
lesbiansing
lesbiansly
lesbianss
lesbo
lesboed
lesboer
lesboes
lesboing
lesboly
lesbos
lesbosed
lesboser
lesboses
lesbosing
lesbosly
lesboss
lez
lezbianed
lezbianer
lezbianes
lezbianing
lezbianly
lezbians
lezbiansed
lezbianser
lezbianses
lezbiansing
lezbiansly
lezbianss
lezbo
lezboed
lezboer
lezboes
lezboing
lezboly
lezbos
lezbosed
lezboser
lezboses
lezbosing
lezbosly
lezboss
lezed
lezer
lezes
lezing
lezly
lezs
lezzie
lezzieed
lezzieer
lezziees
lezzieing
lezziely
lezzies
lezziesed
lezzieser
lezzieses
lezziesing
lezziesly
lezziess
lezzy
lezzyed
lezzyer
lezzyes
lezzying
lezzyly
lezzys
lmaoed
lmaoer
lmaoes
lmaoing
lmaoly
lmaos
lmfao
lmfaoed
lmfaoer
lmfaoes
lmfaoing
lmfaoly
lmfaos
loined
loiner
loines
loining
loinly
loins
loinsed
loinser
loinses
loinsing
loinsly
loinss
lubeed
lubeer
lubees
lubeing
lubely
lubes
lusty
lustyed
lustyer
lustyes
lustying
lustyly
lustys
massa
massaed
massaer
massaes
massaing
massaly
massas
masterbate
masterbateed
masterbateer
masterbatees
masterbateing
masterbately
masterbates
masterbating
masterbatinged
masterbatinger
masterbatinges
masterbatinging
masterbatingly
masterbatings
masterbation
masterbationed
masterbationer
masterbationes
masterbationing
masterbationly
masterbations
masturbate
masturbateed
masturbateer
masturbatees
masturbateing
masturbately
masturbates
masturbating
masturbatinged
masturbatinger
masturbatinges
masturbatinging
masturbatingly
masturbatings
masturbation
masturbationed
masturbationer
masturbationes
masturbationing
masturbationly
masturbations
methed
mether
methes
mething
methly
meths
militaryed
militaryer
militaryes
militarying
militaryly
militarys
mofo
mofoed
mofoer
mofoes
mofoing
mofoly
mofos
molest
molested
molester
molestes
molesting
molestly
molests
moolie
moolieed
moolieer
mooliees
moolieing
mooliely
moolies
moron
moroned
moroner
morones
moroning
moronly
morons
motherfucka
motherfuckaed
motherfuckaer
motherfuckaes
motherfuckaing
motherfuckaly
motherfuckas
motherfucker
motherfuckered
motherfuckerer
motherfuckeres
motherfuckering
motherfuckerly
motherfuckers
motherfucking
motherfuckinged
motherfuckinger
motherfuckinges
motherfuckinging
motherfuckingly
motherfuckings
mtherfucker
mtherfuckered
mtherfuckerer
mtherfuckeres
mtherfuckering
mtherfuckerly
mtherfuckers
mthrfucker
mthrfuckered
mthrfuckerer
mthrfuckeres
mthrfuckering
mthrfuckerly
mthrfuckers
mthrfucking
mthrfuckinged
mthrfuckinger
mthrfuckinges
mthrfuckinging
mthrfuckingly
mthrfuckings
muff
muffdiver
muffdivered
muffdiverer
muffdiveres
muffdivering
muffdiverly
muffdivers
muffed
muffer
muffes
muffing
muffly
muffs
murdered
murderer
murderes
murdering
murderly
murders
muthafuckaz
muthafuckazed
muthafuckazer
muthafuckazes
muthafuckazing
muthafuckazly
muthafuckazs
muthafucker
muthafuckered
muthafuckerer
muthafuckeres
muthafuckering
muthafuckerly
muthafuckers
mutherfucker
mutherfuckered
mutherfuckerer
mutherfuckeres
mutherfuckering
mutherfuckerly
mutherfuckers
mutherfucking
mutherfuckinged
mutherfuckinger
mutherfuckinges
mutherfuckinging
mutherfuckingly
mutherfuckings
muthrfucking
muthrfuckinged
muthrfuckinger
muthrfuckinges
muthrfuckinging
muthrfuckingly
muthrfuckings
nad
naded
nader
nades
nading
nadly
nads
nadsed
nadser
nadses
nadsing
nadsly
nadss
nakeded
nakeder
nakedes
nakeding
nakedly
nakeds
napalm
napalmed
napalmer
napalmes
napalming
napalmly
napalms
nappy
nappyed
nappyer
nappyes
nappying
nappyly
nappys
nazi
nazied
nazier
nazies
naziing
nazily
nazis
nazism
nazismed
nazismer
nazismes
nazisming
nazismly
nazisms
negro
negroed
negroer
negroes
negroing
negroly
negros
nigga
niggaed
niggaer
niggaes
niggah
niggahed
niggaher
niggahes
niggahing
niggahly
niggahs
niggaing
niggaly
niggas
niggased
niggaser
niggases
niggasing
niggasly
niggass
niggaz
niggazed
niggazer
niggazes
niggazing
niggazly
niggazs
nigger
niggered
niggerer
niggeres
niggering
niggerly
niggers
niggersed
niggerser
niggerses
niggersing
niggersly
niggerss
niggle
niggleed
niggleer
nigglees
niggleing
nigglely
niggles
niglet
nigleted
nigleter
nigletes
nigleting
nigletly
niglets
nimrod
nimroded
nimroder
nimrodes
nimroding
nimrodly
nimrods
ninny
ninnyed
ninnyer
ninnyes
ninnying
ninnyly
ninnys
nooky
nookyed
nookyer
nookyes
nookying
nookyly
nookys
nuccitelli
nuccitellied
nuccitellier
nuccitellies
nuccitelliing
nuccitellily
nuccitellis
nympho
nymphoed
nymphoer
nymphoes
nymphoing
nympholy
nymphos
opium
opiumed
opiumer
opiumes
opiuming
opiumly
opiums
orgies
orgiesed
orgieser
orgieses
orgiesing
orgiesly
orgiess
orgy
orgyed
orgyer
orgyes
orgying
orgyly
orgys
paddy
paddyed
paddyer
paddyes
paddying
paddyly
paddys
paki
pakied
pakier
pakies
pakiing
pakily
pakis
pantie
pantieed
pantieer
pantiees
pantieing
pantiely
panties
pantiesed
pantieser
pantieses
pantiesing
pantiesly
pantiess
panty
pantyed
pantyer
pantyes
pantying
pantyly
pantys
pastie
pastieed
pastieer
pastiees
pastieing
pastiely
pasties
pasty
pastyed
pastyer
pastyes
pastying
pastyly
pastys
pecker
peckered
peckerer
peckeres
peckering
peckerly
peckers
pedo
pedoed
pedoer
pedoes
pedoing
pedoly
pedophile
pedophileed
pedophileer
pedophilees
pedophileing
pedophilely
pedophiles
pedophilia
pedophiliac
pedophiliaced
pedophiliacer
pedophiliaces
pedophiliacing
pedophiliacly
pedophiliacs
pedophiliaed
pedophiliaer
pedophiliaes
pedophiliaing
pedophilialy
pedophilias
pedos
penial
penialed
penialer
peniales
penialing
penially
penials
penile
penileed
penileer
penilees
penileing
penilely
peniles
penis
penised
peniser
penises
penising
penisly
peniss
perversion
perversioned
perversioner
perversiones
perversioning
perversionly
perversions
peyote
peyoteed
peyoteer
peyotees
peyoteing
peyotely
peyotes
phuck
phucked
phucker
phuckes
phucking
phuckly
phucks
pillowbiter
pillowbitered
pillowbiterer
pillowbiteres
pillowbitering
pillowbiterly
pillowbiters
pimp
pimped
pimper
pimpes
pimping
pimply
pimps
pinko
pinkoed
pinkoer
pinkoes
pinkoing
pinkoly
pinkos
pissed
pisseded
pisseder
pissedes
pisseding
pissedly
pisseds
pisser
pisses
pissing
pissly
pissoff
pissoffed
pissoffer
pissoffes
pissoffing
pissoffly
pissoffs
pisss
polack
polacked
polacker
polackes
polacking
polackly
polacks
pollock
pollocked
pollocker
pollockes
pollocking
pollockly
pollocks
poon
pooned
pooner
poones
pooning
poonly
poons
poontang
poontanged
poontanger
poontanges
poontanging
poontangly
poontangs
porn
porned
porner
pornes
porning
pornly
porno
pornoed
pornoer
pornoes
pornography
pornographyed
pornographyer
pornographyes
pornographying
pornographyly
pornographys
pornoing
pornoly
pornos
porns
prick
pricked
pricker
prickes
pricking
prickly
pricks
prig
priged
priger
priges
priging
prigly
prigs
prostitute
prostituteed
prostituteer
prostitutees
prostituteing
prostitutely
prostitutes
prude
prudeed
prudeer
prudees
prudeing
prudely
prudes
punkass
punkassed
punkasser
punkasses
punkassing
punkassly
punkasss
punky
punkyed
punkyer
punkyes
punkying
punkyly
punkys
puss
pussed
pusser
pusses
pussies
pussiesed
pussieser
pussieses
pussiesing
pussiesly
pussiess
pussing
pussly
pusss
pussy
pussyed
pussyer
pussyes
pussying
pussyly
pussypounder
pussypoundered
pussypounderer
pussypounderes
pussypoundering
pussypounderly
pussypounders
pussys
puto
putoed
putoer
putoes
putoing
putoly
putos
queaf
queafed
queafer
queafes
queafing
queafly
queafs
queef
queefed
queefer
queefes
queefing
queefly
queefs
queer
queered
queerer
queeres
queering
queerly
queero
queeroed
queeroer
queeroes
queeroing
queeroly
queeros
queers
queersed
queerser
queerses
queersing
queersly
queerss
quicky
quickyed
quickyer
quickyes
quickying
quickyly
quickys
quim
quimed
quimer
quimes
quiming
quimly
quims
racy
racyed
racyer
racyes
racying
racyly
racys
rape
raped
rapeded
rapeder
rapedes
rapeding
rapedly
rapeds
rapeed
rapeer
rapees
rapeing
rapely
raper
rapered
raperer
raperes
rapering
raperly
rapers
rapes
rapist
rapisted
rapister
rapistes
rapisting
rapistly
rapists
raunch
raunched
rauncher
raunches
raunching
raunchly
raunchs
rectus
rectused
rectuser
rectuses
rectusing
rectusly
rectuss
reefer
reefered
reeferer
reeferes
reefering
reeferly
reefers
reetard
reetarded
reetarder
reetardes
reetarding
reetardly
reetards
reich
reiched
reicher
reiches
reiching
reichly
reichs
retard
retarded
retardeded
retardeder
retardedes
retardeding
retardedly
retardeds
retarder
retardes
retarding
retardly
retards
rimjob
rimjobed
rimjober
rimjobes
rimjobing
rimjobly
rimjobs
ritard
ritarded
ritarder
ritardes
ritarding
ritardly
ritards
rtard
rtarded
rtarder
rtardes
rtarding
rtardly
rtards
rum
rumed
rumer
rumes
ruming
rumly
rump
rumped
rumper
rumpes
rumping
rumply
rumprammer
rumprammered
rumprammerer
rumprammeres
rumprammering
rumprammerly
rumprammers
rumps
rums
ruski
ruskied
ruskier
ruskies
ruskiing
ruskily
ruskis
sadism
sadismed
sadismer
sadismes
sadisming
sadismly
sadisms
sadist
sadisted
sadister
sadistes
sadisting
sadistly
sadists
scag
scaged
scager
scages
scaging
scagly
scags
scantily
scantilyed
scantilyer
scantilyes
scantilying
scantilyly
scantilys
schlong
schlonged
schlonger
schlonges
schlonging
schlongly
schlongs
scrog
scroged
scroger
scroges
scroging
scrogly
scrogs
scrot
scrote
scroted
scroteed
scroteer
scrotees
scroteing
scrotely
scroter
scrotes
scroting
scrotly
scrots
scrotum
scrotumed
scrotumer
scrotumes
scrotuming
scrotumly
scrotums
scrud
scruded
scruder
scrudes
scruding
scrudly
scruds
scum
scumed
scumer
scumes
scuming
scumly
scums
seaman
seamaned
seamaner
seamanes
seamaning
seamanly
seamans
seamen
seamened
seamener
seamenes
seamening
seamenly
seamens
seduceed
seduceer
seducees
seduceing
seducely
seduces
semen
semened
semener
semenes
semening
semenly
semens
shamedame
shamedameed
shamedameer
shamedamees
shamedameing
shamedamely
shamedames
shit
shite
shiteater
shiteatered
shiteaterer
shiteateres
shiteatering
shiteaterly
shiteaters
shited
shiteed
shiteer
shitees
shiteing
shitely
shiter
shites
shitface
shitfaceed
shitfaceer
shitfacees
shitfaceing
shitfacely
shitfaces
shithead
shitheaded
shitheader
shitheades
shitheading
shitheadly
shitheads
shithole
shitholeed
shitholeer
shitholees
shitholeing
shitholely
shitholes
shithouse
shithouseed
shithouseer
shithousees
shithouseing
shithousely
shithouses
shiting
shitly
shits
shitsed
shitser
shitses
shitsing
shitsly
shitss
shitt
shitted
shitteded
shitteder
shittedes
shitteding
shittedly
shitteds
shitter
shittered
shitterer
shitteres
shittering
shitterly
shitters
shittes
shitting
shittly
shitts
shitty
shittyed
shittyer
shittyes
shittying
shittyly
shittys
shiz
shized
shizer
shizes
shizing
shizly
shizs
shooted
shooter
shootes
shooting
shootly
shoots
sissy
sissyed
sissyer
sissyes
sissying
sissyly
sissys
skag
skaged
skager
skages
skaging
skagly
skags
skank
skanked
skanker
skankes
skanking
skankly
skanks
slave
slaveed
slaveer
slavees
slaveing
slavely
slaves
sleaze
sleazeed
sleazeer
sleazees
sleazeing
sleazely
sleazes
sleazy
sleazyed
sleazyer
sleazyes
sleazying
sleazyly
sleazys
slut
slutdumper
slutdumpered
slutdumperer
slutdumperes
slutdumpering
slutdumperly
slutdumpers
sluted
sluter
slutes
sluting
slutkiss
slutkissed
slutkisser
slutkisses
slutkissing
slutkissly
slutkisss
slutly
sluts
slutsed
slutser
slutses
slutsing
slutsly
slutss
smegma
smegmaed
smegmaer
smegmaes
smegmaing
smegmaly
smegmas
smut
smuted
smuter
smutes
smuting
smutly
smuts
smutty
smuttyed
smuttyer
smuttyes
smuttying
smuttyly
smuttys
snatch
snatched
snatcher
snatches
snatching
snatchly
snatchs
sniper
snipered
sniperer
sniperes
snipering
sniperly
snipers
snort
snorted
snorter
snortes
snorting
snortly
snorts
snuff
snuffed
snuffer
snuffes
snuffing
snuffly
snuffs
sodom
sodomed
sodomer
sodomes
sodoming
sodomly
sodoms
spic
spiced
spicer
spices
spicing
spick
spicked
spicker
spickes
spicking
spickly
spicks
spicly
spics
spik
spoof
spoofed
spoofer
spoofes
spoofing
spoofly
spoofs
spooge
spoogeed
spoogeer
spoogees
spoogeing
spoogely
spooges
spunk
spunked
spunker
spunkes
spunking
spunkly
spunks
steamyed
steamyer
steamyes
steamying
steamyly
steamys
stfu
stfued
stfuer
stfues
stfuing
stfuly
stfus
stiffy
stiffyed
stiffyer
stiffyes
stiffying
stiffyly
stiffys
stoneded
stoneder
stonedes
stoneding
stonedly
stoneds
stupided
stupider
stupides
stupiding
stupidly
stupids
suckeded
suckeder
suckedes
suckeding
suckedly
suckeds
sucker
suckes
sucking
suckinged
suckinger
suckinges
suckinging
suckingly
suckings
suckly
sucks
sumofabiatch
sumofabiatched
sumofabiatcher
sumofabiatches
sumofabiatching
sumofabiatchly
sumofabiatchs
tard
tarded
tarder
tardes
tarding
tardly
tards
tawdry
tawdryed
tawdryer
tawdryes
tawdrying
tawdryly
tawdrys
teabagging
teabagginged
teabagginger
teabagginges
teabagginging
teabaggingly
teabaggings
terd
terded
terder
terdes
terding
terdly
terds
teste
testee
testeed
testeeed
testeeer
testeees
testeeing
testeely
testeer
testees
testeing
testely
testes
testesed
testeser
testeses
testesing
testesly
testess
testicle
testicleed
testicleer
testiclees
testicleing
testiclely
testicles
testis
testised
testiser
testises
testising
testisly
testiss
thrusted
thruster
thrustes
thrusting
thrustly
thrusts
thug
thuged
thuger
thuges
thuging
thugly
thugs
tinkle
tinkleed
tinkleer
tinklees
tinkleing
tinklely
tinkles
tit
tited
titer
tites
titfuck
titfucked
titfucker
titfuckes
titfucking
titfuckly
titfucks
titi
titied
titier
tities
titiing
titily
titing
titis
titly
tits
titsed
titser
titses
titsing
titsly
titss
tittiefucker
tittiefuckered
tittiefuckerer
tittiefuckeres
tittiefuckering
tittiefuckerly
tittiefuckers
titties
tittiesed
tittieser
tittieses
tittiesing
tittiesly
tittiess
titty
tittyed
tittyer
tittyes
tittyfuck
tittyfucked
tittyfucker
tittyfuckered
tittyfuckerer
tittyfuckeres
tittyfuckering
tittyfuckerly
tittyfuckers
tittyfuckes
tittyfucking
tittyfuckly
tittyfucks
tittying
tittyly
tittys
toke
tokeed
tokeer
tokees
tokeing
tokely
tokes
toots
tootsed
tootser
tootses
tootsing
tootsly
tootss
tramp
tramped
tramper
trampes
tramping
tramply
tramps
transsexualed
transsexualer
transsexuales
transsexualing
transsexually
transsexuals
trashy
trashyed
trashyer
trashyes
trashying
trashyly
trashys
tubgirl
tubgirled
tubgirler
tubgirles
tubgirling
tubgirlly
tubgirls
turd
turded
turder
turdes
turding
turdly
turds
tush
tushed
tusher
tushes
tushing
tushly
tushs
twat
twated
twater
twates
twating
twatly
twats
twatsed
twatser
twatses
twatsing
twatsly
twatss
undies
undiesed
undieser
undieses
undiesing
undiesly
undiess
unweded
unweder
unwedes
unweding
unwedly
unweds
uzi
uzied
uzier
uzies
uziing
uzily
uzis
vag
vaged
vager
vages
vaging
vagly
vags
valium
valiumed
valiumer
valiumes
valiuming
valiumly
valiums
venous
virgined
virginer
virgines
virgining
virginly
virgins
vixen
vixened
vixener
vixenes
vixening
vixenly
vixens
vodkaed
vodkaer
vodkaes
vodkaing
vodkaly
vodkas
voyeur
voyeured
voyeurer
voyeures
voyeuring
voyeurly
voyeurs
vulgar
vulgared
vulgarer
vulgares
vulgaring
vulgarly
vulgars
wang
wanged
wanger
wanges
wanging
wangly
wangs
wank
wanked
wanker
wankered
wankerer
wankeres
wankering
wankerly
wankers
wankes
wanking
wankly
wanks
wazoo
wazooed
wazooer
wazooes
wazooing
wazooly
wazoos
wedgie
wedgieed
wedgieer
wedgiees
wedgieing
wedgiely
wedgies
weeded
weeder
weedes
weeding
weedly
weeds
weenie
weenieed
weenieer
weeniees
weenieing
weeniely
weenies
weewee
weeweeed
weeweeer
weeweees
weeweeing
weeweely
weewees
weiner
weinered
weinerer
weineres
weinering
weinerly
weiners
weirdo
weirdoed
weirdoer
weirdoes
weirdoing
weirdoly
weirdos
wench
wenched
wencher
wenches
wenching
wenchly
wenchs
wetback
wetbacked
wetbacker
wetbackes
wetbacking
wetbackly
wetbacks
whitey
whiteyed
whiteyer
whiteyes
whiteying
whiteyly
whiteys
whiz
whized
whizer
whizes
whizing
whizly
whizs
whoralicious
whoralicioused
whoraliciouser
whoraliciouses
whoraliciousing
whoraliciously
whoraliciouss
whore
whorealicious
whorealicioused
whorealiciouser
whorealiciouses
whorealiciousing
whorealiciously
whorealiciouss
whored
whoreded
whoreder
whoredes
whoreding
whoredly
whoreds
whoreed
whoreer
whorees
whoreface
whorefaceed
whorefaceer
whorefacees
whorefaceing
whorefacely
whorefaces
whorehopper
whorehoppered
whorehopperer
whorehopperes
whorehoppering
whorehopperly
whorehoppers
whorehouse
whorehouseed
whorehouseer
whorehousees
whorehouseing
whorehousely
whorehouses
whoreing
whorely
whores
whoresed
whoreser
whoreses
whoresing
whoresly
whoress
whoring
whoringed
whoringer
whoringes
whoringing
whoringly
whorings
wigger
wiggered
wiggerer
wiggeres
wiggering
wiggerly
wiggers
woody
woodyed
woodyer
woodyes
woodying
woodyly
woodys
wop
woped
woper
wopes
woping
woply
wops
wtf
wtfed
wtfer
wtfes
wtfing
wtfly
wtfs
xxx
xxxed
xxxer
xxxes
xxxing
xxxly
xxxs
yeasty
yeastyed
yeastyer
yeastyes
yeastying
yeastyly
yeastys
yobbo
yobboed
yobboer
yobboes
yobboing
yobboly
yobbos
zoophile
zoophileed
zoophileer
zoophilees
zoophileing
zoophilely
zoophiles
anal
ass
ass lick
balls
ballsac
bisexual
bleach
causas
cheap
cost of miracles
cunt
display network stats
fart
fda and death
fda AND warn
fda AND warning
fda AND warns
feom
fuck
gfc
humira AND expensive
illegal
madvocate
masturbation
nuccitelli
overdose
porn
shit
snort
texarkana
direct\-acting antivirals
assistance
ombitasvir
support path
harvoni
abbvie
direct-acting antivirals
paritaprevir
advocacy
ledipasvir
vpak
ritonavir with dasabuvir
program
gilead
greedy
financial
needy
fake-ovir
viekira pak
v pak
sofosbuvir
support
oasis
discount
dasabuvir
protest
ritonavir
section[contains(@class, 'nav-hidden')]
footer[@id='footer']
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-article-cleveland-clinic')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-home-cleveland-clinic')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-pub-topic-cleveland-clinic')]
div[contains(@class, 'panel-panel-inner')]
div[contains(@class, 'pane-node-field-article-topics')]
section[contains(@class, 'footer-nav-section-wrapper')]
A 67-year-old woman with bilateral hand numbness
A 67-year-old woman presents to the emergency department after 8 weeks of progressive numbness and tingling in both hands, involving all fingers. The numbness has increased in severity in the last 3 days. She also has occasional numbness around her mouth. She reports no numbness in her feet.
She says she underwent thyroid surgery twice for thyroid cancer 10 years ago. Her medical history also includes type 2 diabetes mellitus (diagnosed 1 year ago), hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diastolic heart failure (diagnosed 5 years ago).
Her current medications are:
- Metformin 1 g twice a day
- Candesartan 16 mg once a day
- Atorvastatin 20 mg once a day
- Furosemide 40 mg twice a day
- Levothyroxine 100 μg per day
- Calcium carbonate 1,500 mg twice a day
- A vitamin D tablet twice a day, which she has not taken for the last 2 months.
She admits she has not been taking her medications regularly because she has been feeling depressed.
On physical examination, she is alert and oriented but appears anxious. She is not in respiratory distress. Her blood pressure is 150/90 mm Hg and her pulse is 92 beats per minute and regular. There is a thyroidectomy scar on the anterior neck. Her jugular venous pressure is not elevated. Her heart sounds are normal without extra sounds. She has no pulmonary rales and no lower-extremity edema.
The Phalen test and Tinel test for carpal tunnel syndrome are negative in both hands. Using a Katz hand diagram, the patient reports tingling and numbness in all fingers, both palms, and the dorsum of both hands. Tapping the area over the facial nerve does not elicit twitching of the facial muscles (ie, no Chvostek sign), but compression of the upper arm elicits carpal spasm (ie, positive Trousseau sign). There is no evidence of motor weakness in her hands. The rest of the physical examination is unremarkable.
POSSIBLE CAUSES OF NUMBNESS
1. Based on the initial evaluation, which of the following is the most likely cause of our patient’s bilateral hand numbness?
- Hypocalcemia due to primary hypoparathyroidism
- Carpal tunnel syndrome due to primary hypothyroidism
- Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
- Vitamin B12 deficiency due to metformin
- Hypocalcemia due to low serum calcitonin
All the conditions above except low serum calcitonin can cause bilateral hand paresthesia. Our patient most likely has hypocalcemia due to primary hypoparathyroidism.
Hypocalcemia
In our patient, bilateral hand numbness and perioral numbness after stopping vitamin D and a positive Trousseau sign strongly suggest hypocalcemia. The classic physical findings in patients with hypocalcemia are the Trousseau sign and the Chvostek sign. The Trousseau sign is elicited by inflating a blood pressure cuff above the systolic blood pressure for 3 minutes and observing for ischemia-induced carpopedal spasm, wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint flexion, thumb adduction, and interphalangeal joint extension. The Chvostek sign is elicited by tapping over the area of the facial nerve below the zygoma in front of the tragus, resulting in ipsilateral twitching of facial muscles.
Although the Trousseau sign is more sensitive and specific than the Chvostek sign, neither is pathognomonic for hypocalcemia.1 The Chvostek sign has been reported to be negative in 30% of patients with hypocalcemia and positive in 10% of normocalcemic individuals.1 The Trousseau sign, however, is present in 94% of hypocalcemic patients vs 1% of normocalcemic individuals.2
Primary hypoparathyroidism secondary to thyroidectomy. Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism is the most common cause of primary hypoparathyroidism. It results from ischemic injury or accidental removal of the parathyroid glands during anterior neck surgery.3,4 The consequent hypocalcemia can be transient, intermittent, or permanent. Permanent postsurgical hypoparathyroidism is defined as persistent hypocalcemia with insufficient parathyroid hormone (PTH) for more than 12 months after neck surgery; however, some consider 6 months to be enough to define the condition.5–7
The incidence of postsurgical hypoparathyroidism varies considerably with the extent of thyroid surgery and the experience of the surgeon.6,8 In the hands of experienced surgeons, permanent hypoparathyroidism occurs in fewer than 1% of patients after total thyroidectomy, whereas the rate may be higher than 6% with less-experienced surgeons.5,9 Other risk factors for postsurgical hypoparathyroidism include female sex, autoimmune thyroid disease, pregnancy, and lactation.5
Pseudohypoparathyroidism is a group of disorders characterized by renal resistance to PTH, leading to hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and elevated serum PTH. It is also associated with phenotypic features such as short stature and short fourth metacarpal bones.
Calcitonin deficiency. Calcitonin is a polypeptide hormone secreted from the parafollicular (C) cells of the thyroid gland. After total thyroidectomy, calcitonin levels are expected to be reduced. However, the role of calcitonin in humans is unclear. One study has shown that calcitonin is possibly a vestigial hormone, given that no calcitonin-related disorders (excess or deficiency) have been reported in humans.10
Carpal tunnel syndrome due to hypothyroidism
Our patient also could have primary hypothyroidism as a result of thyroidectomy. Hypothyroidism can cause bilateral hand numbness due to carpal tunnel syndrome, which is mediated by mucopolysaccharide deposition and synovial membrane swelling.11 One study reported that 29% of patients with hypothyroidism had carpal tunnel syndrome.12 Symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome in hypothyroid patients may occur despite thyroid replacement therapy.13
Carpal tunnel syndrome is a clinical diagnosis. Patients usually experience hand paresthesia in the distribution of the median nerve. Provocative physical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome include the Tinel test, the Phalen test, and the Katz hand diagram, which is considered the best of the 3 tests.14,15 Based on how the patient marks the location and type of symptoms on the diagram, carpal tunnel syndrome is rated as classic, probable, possible, or unlikely (Table 1).14,16,17 The sensitivity of a classic or probable diagram ranges from 64% to 80%, while the specificity ranges from 73% to 90%.14,15
Carpal tunnel syndrome is less likely to be the cause of our patient’s symptoms, as her Katz hand diagram indicates only “possible” carpal tunnel syndrome. Her perioral numbness and positive Trousseau sign make hypocalcemia a more likely cause.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Sensory peripheral neuropathy is a recognized complication of diabetes mellitus. However, neuropathy in diabetic patients most commonly manifests initially as distal symmetrical ascending neuropathy starting in the lower extremities.18 Therefore, diabetic peripheral neuropathy is less likely in this patient since her symptoms are limited to her hands.
Vitamin B12 deficiency
Metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency is another possible cause of peripheral neuropathy. It might be secondary to metformin-induced changes in intrinsic factor levels and small-intestine motility with resultant bacterial overgrowth, as well as inhibition of vitamin B12 absorption in the terminal ileum.19
However, metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency is not the most likely cause of our patient’s neuropathy, since she has been taking this drug for only 1 year. Vitamin B12 deficiency with consequent peripheral neuropathy is more likely in patients taking metformin in high doses for 10 or more years.20
Laboratory results and electrocardiography
Table 2 shows the patient’s initial laboratory results. Of note, her serum calcium level is 5.7 mg/dL (reference range 8.9–10.1). Electrocardiography in the emergency department shows:
- Prolonged PR interval (23 msec)
- Wide QRS complexes (13 msec)
- Flat T waves
- Prolonged corrected QT interval (475 msec)
- Occasional premature ventricular complexes.
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF HYPOCALCEMIA
2. Which of the following is not a manifestation of hypocalcemia?
- Tonic-clonic seizures
- Cyanosis
- Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias
- Acute pancreatitis
- Depression
Hypocalcemia can cause a wide range of clinical manifestations (Table 3), the extent and severity of which depend on the severity of hypocalcemia and how quickly it develops. The more acute the hypocalcemia, the more severe the manifestations.21
Tetany can cause seizures
Hypocalcemia is characterized by neuromuscular hyperexcitability, manifested clinically by tetany.22 Manifestations of tetany are numerous and include acral paresthesia, perioral numbness, muscle cramps, carpopedal spasm, and seizures. Tetany is the hallmark of hypocalcemia regardless of etiology. However, certain causes are associated with peculiar clinical manifestations. For example, chronic primary hypoparathyroidism may be associated with basal ganglia calcifications that can result in parkinsonism, other extrapyramidal disorders, and dementia (Table 4).6
Airway spasm can be fatal
A serious manifestation of acute severe hypocalcemia is spasm of the glottis muscles, which may cause cyanosis and, if untreated, death.21
Ventricular arrhythmias
Another potential fatal complication of acute severe hypocalcemia is polymorphic ventricular tachycardia due to prolongation of the QT interval, which is readily identified with electrocardiography.23
Hypocalcemia does not cause pancreatitis
Hypercalcemia, rather than hypocalcemia, may cause acute pancreatitis.24 Conversely, acute pancreatitis may cause hypocalcemia due to precipitation of calcium in the abdominal cavity.25
Psychiatric manifestations
In addition to depression, hypocalcemia is associated with psychiatric manifestations including anxiety, confusion, and emotional instability.
STEPS TO DIAGNOSIS OF HYPOCALCEMIA
First step: Confirm true hypocalcemia
Calcium circulates in the blood in 3 forms: bound to albumin (40% to 45%), bound to anions (10% to 15%), and free (ionized) (45%). Although ionized calcium is the active form, most laboratories report total serum calcium.
Since changes in serum albumin concentration affect the total serum calcium level, it is imperative to correct the measured serum calcium to the serum albumin concentration. Each 1-g/dL decrease in serum albumin lowers the total serum calcium by 0.8 mg/dL. Thus:
Corrected serum calcium (mg/dL) =
measured total serum calcium (mg/dL) +
0.8 (4 − serum albumin [g/dL]).
If the patient’s serum calcium level remains low when corrected for serum albumin, he or she has true hypocalcemia, which implies a low ionized serum calcium. Conversely, pseudohypocalcemia means that the measured calcium level is low but the corrected serum calcium is normal.
Using this formula, our patient’s corrected calcium level is calculated as 5.7 + 0.8 (4 – 3.2) = 6.3 mg/dL, indicating true hypocalcemia.
PHOSPHATE IS OFTEN HIGH WHEN CALCIUM IS LOW
In addition to hypocalcemia, our patient has an elevated phosphate level (Table 2).
3. Which of the following hypocalcemic disorders is not associated with hyperphosphatemia?
- End-stage renal disease
- Primary hypoparathyroidism
- Pseudohypoparathyroidism
- Vitamin D3 deficiency
- Rhabdomyolysis
Vitamin D deficiency is not associated with hyperphosphatemia.
Second step in evaluating hypocalcemia: Check phosphate, magnesium, creatinine
The major causes of hypocalcemia can be categorized according to the serum phosphate level: high vs normal or low (Table 5).
High-phosphate, low-calcium states. In the absence of concurrent end-stage renal disease and an excessive phosphate load, primary hypoparathyroidism is the most likely cause of hypocalcemia associated with hyperphosphatemia.
PTH increases serum ionized calcium by26,27:
- Increasing bone resorption
- Increasing reabsorption of calcium from the distal renal tubules
- Increasing the activity of 1-alpha-hydroxylase, responsible for conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (the most biologically active vitamin D metabolite); 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increases the absorption of calcium and phosphate from the intestine.
Conversely, PTH decreases reabsorption of phosphate from proximal renal tubules, resulting in hypophosphatemia. Therefore, low serum PTH (primary hypoparathyroidism) or a PTH-resistant state (pseudohypoparathyroidism) results in hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia.26,27
Both end-stage renal disease and rhabdomyolysis are associated with high serum phosphate levels. The kidney normally excretes excess dietary phosphate to maintain phosphate homeostasis; however, this is impaired in end-stage renal disease, leading to hyperphosphatemia. In rhabdomyolysis, it is mainly the transcellular shift of phosphate into the extracellular space from myocyte injury that raises phosphate levels.
Normal- or low-phosphate, low calcium states. Hypocalcemia can also result from vitamin D deficiency, but this cause is associated with a low or normal serum phosphate level. In such cases, hypocalcemia causes secondary hyperparathyroidism with consequent renal phosphate loss and, thus, hypophosphatemia.27
Third step: Check serum intact PTH and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
Hypocalcemia stimulates secretion of PTH. Therefore, hypocalcemia with elevated serum PTH is caused by disorders that do not impair PTH secretion, including chronic renal failure and vitamin D deficiency (Table 5). Conversely, hypocalcemia with low or normal serum PTH levels suggests primary hypoparathyroidism.
Our patient’s serum PTH level is 20 ng/mL, which is within the reference range. This does not discount the diagnosis of primary hypoparathyroidism. Although most patients with primary hypoparathyroidism have low or undetectable serum PTH levels, some have normal PTH levels if some degree of PTH production is preserved.5,7,28–30 In these patients, the remaining functioning parathyroid tissue is not enough to maintain a normal serum calcium level, resulting in hypocalcemia. As a result, hypocalcemia stimulates the remaining parathyroid tissue to its maximum output, producing PTH levels usually within the lower or middle-normal range.30 In such patients, the terms parathyroid insufficiency and relative primary hypoparathyroidism are more precise than primary hypoparathyroidism.
Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism with an inappropriately normal PTH level is usually seen in patients with disorders that impair intestinal calcium absorption or bone resorption.31 In our patient’s case, the “normal” serum PTH level is likely due to maximal stimulation of remaining functioning parathyroid tissue by severe hypocalcemia, which is a result of her discontinuation of calcium and calcitriol therapy and her vitamin D deficiency.
CASE RESUMED: NO RESPONSE TO INTRAVENOUS CALCIUM GLUCONATE
The patient is given 2 10-mL ampules of 10% calcium gluconate diluted in 100 mL of 5% dextrose in water over 20 minutes intravenously. Electrocardiographic monitoring is continued. Two hours later, her measured serum calcium is only 5.8 mg/dL, with no improvement in her symptoms.
A continuous infusion of calcium gluconate is started: 12 ampules of calcium gluconate are added to 380 mL of 5% dextrose in water and infused at 40 mL/hour (infused rate of elemental calcium = 1.3 mg/kg/hour); 3 hours later, her measured serum calcium level is still only 5.8 mg//dL; at 6 hours it is 5.9 mg/dL, and her symptoms have not improved.
4. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
- Change the calcium gluconate to calcium chloride
- Increase the infusion rate to 1.5 mg of elemental calcium/kg/hour
- Give a bolus of 2 10-mL ampules of 10% calcium gluconate intravenously over 1 minute
- Give additional oral calcium tablets
- Check the serum magnesium level
Treatment of hypocalcemia can involve intravenous or oral calcium therapy.
Intravenous calcium is indicated for patients with any of the following6,32:
- Moderate to severe neuromuscular irritability (eg, acral paresthesia, carpopedal spasm, prolonged QT interval, seizures, laryngospasm, bronchospasm)
- Acute hypocalcemia with corrected serum calcium level less than 7.6 mg/dL, even if the patient is asymptomatic
- Cardiac failure.
One 10-mL ampule of 10% calcium gluconate contains 93 mg of elemental calcium; 1 or 2 ampules are typically diluted in 50 to 100 mL of 5% dextrose in water and infused slowly over 15 to 20 minutes. Rapid administration of intravenous calcium is contraindicated, as it may produce cardiac arrhythmias and possibly cardiac arrest. Therefore, intravenous calcium should be given slowly while continuing electrocardiographic monitoring.33
Since the effect of 1 ampule of calcium gluconate lasts only 2 to 3 hours, most patients with symptomatic hypocalcemia require continuous intravenous calcium infusion. The recommended dose of infused elemental calcium is 0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/hour.34 Several ampules are added to 500 to 1,000 mL of 5% dextrose in water or 0.9% normal saline and infused at a rate appropriate for the patient’s corrected calcium and symptoms.
Oral calcium and vitamin D supplements can be given initially to patients with a corrected serum calcium level of 7.6 mg/dL or greater, with or without mild symptoms, if they can tolerate oral intake. However, this is not the treatment of choice for resistant acute hypocalcemia, as in this case.
Calcium chloride has no advantages over calcium gluconate. Further, it can be associated with local irritation and may result in tissue necrosis if extravasation occurs.35
Increasing the infusion rate of calcium gluconate to the maximum recommended dose may improve the patient’s ionized calcium level and symptoms somewhat. However, it is not the best option for this patient, given that she did not respond to 2 ampules of calcium gluconate followed by continuous infusion of 1.3 mg/kg/hour for 6 hours.
Calcium gluconate bolus. Similarly, giving the patient an additional 2 ampules of calcium gluconate over 1 minute would not be recommended, as rapid administration of intravenous calcium gluconate (eg, over 1 minute) is contraindicated.
Check magnesium
If hypocalcemia persists despite intravenous calcium therapy, as in our patient, further investigation or action is required. An important cause of persistent hypocalcemia is severe hypomagnesemia. Severe hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium < 0.8 mg/dL) causes resistant hypocalcemia by several mechanisms:
- Inducing PTH resistance32,36,37
- Decreasing PTH secretion32,36
- Decreasing calcitriol production.
The decrease in calcitriol production is a direct effect of hypomagnesemia, but it is also an indirect effect of low PTH secretion, which inhibits the enzyme 1-alpha-hydroxylase. Thus, conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to calcitriol is impaired, leading to low calcitriol production.
Our patient could have hypomagnesemia due to furosemide use and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Hypocalcemia resistant to calcium therapy may occasionally respond to magnesium therapy even if the serum magnesium level is normal. This may be due to depleted intracellular magnesium salt levels.6,38 Rarely, severe hypermagnesemia can also be associated with hypocalcemia due to inhibition of PTH secretion.37,39
CASE RESUMED
Our patient’s serum magnesium level is 0.6 mg/dL (reference range 1.7–2.4 mg/dL). She is given 2 g of magnesium sulfate in 60 mL of 0.9% normal saline infused over 1 hour, followed by a continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate (12 g diluted in 250 mL of 0.9% normal saline, infused over 24 hours). On repeat testing 4 hours later, her serum magnesium level is 0.7 mg/dL, and at 8 hours later it is 0.9 mg/dL. She is subsequently started on oral magnesium oxide 600 mg per day. The magnesium sulfate infusion is continued for another 24 hours.
PREVENTING HYPERCALCIURIA
Patients with low PTH (primary hypoparathyroidism) may have hypercalciuria due to decreased renal tubular calcium reabsorption. Two important measures can minimize hypercalciuria in such patients:
- Keeping the serum calcium level in the low-normal range4,5,40
- Giving a thiazide diuretic (eg, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5–50 mg daily) with a low-salt diet.41,42
A thiazide diuretic is usually started once the 24-hour urine calcium reaches 250 mg.6 Thiazides are thought to enhance both proximal and distal renal tubular calcium reabsorption.43,44
PRIMARY HYPOPARATHYROIDISM: LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT
Long-term management of primary hypoparathyroidism requires calcium and vitamin D supplementation.
Calcium supplements. The most commonly prescribed calcium preparations are calcium carbonate and calcium citrate (containing 40% and 20% elemental calcium, respectively). Calcium carbonate, which is less expensive than calcium citrate, binds with phosphate intake and requires an acidic environment for absorption, and so it is better absorbed when taken with meals. Because calcium citrate does not require an acidic environment for absorption, it is the calcium preparation of choice for patients on proton pump inhibitors, or patients with achlorhydria or constipation.45 Calcium doses vary widely, with most hypoparathyroid patients requiring 1 to 2 g of elemental calcium daily.6
Vitamin D supplements. To promote intestinal absorption, calcium is combined with vitamin D in a fixed-dose preparation given in divided doses.46 Calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) is the most active metabolite of vitamin D, with rapid onset and offset of action, and it is the preferred form of vitamin D therapy for patients with hypoparathyroidism. If calcitriol is not available or is not affordable, alphacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3) is another option. This is a synthetic analogue of vitamin D that is already hyroxylated at the C1 position. After oral intake, it is hydroxylated in the liver to form calcitriol.
Since renal production of calcitriol is PTH-dependent, in hypoparathyroidism the conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to calcitriol is limited. Therefore, vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) are not the preferred forms of vitamin D for such patients. However, either can be added to calcitriol, as they may have extraskeletal benefits.7
CASE CONCLUDED
Our patient presented with primary parathyroid insufficiency associated with vitamin D deficiency. Therefore, in addition to calcitriol and calcium combined with vitamin D in a fixed-dose preparation, her management included vitamin D3 for her vitamin D deficiency.
She was discharged on these medications. At a follow-up visit 3 weeks later, her measured serum calcium level was 8.6 mg/dL. She reported gradual resolution of her symptoms. She was also referred to a psychiatrist for her depression.
TAKE-HOME POINTS
- Hypocalcemia causes neuromuscular excitability, manifested clinically by tetany.
- Common causes of hypocalcemia include vitamin D deficiency, hypomagnesemia, renal failure, and primary hypoparathyroidism.
- The first step in evaluating hypocalcemia is to correct the measured serum calcium to the serum albumin concentration.
- Laboratory testing for hypocalcemia should include serum phosphorus, magnesium, creatinine, PTH, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.
- Primary hypoparathyroidism is characterized by hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and low serum PTH.
- Moderate to severe manifestations of hypo-
calcemia and acute hypocalcemia (< 7.6 mg/dL), even if asymptomatic, warrant intravenous calcium therapy. - Correction of hypomagnesemia is essential to treat hypocalcemia, especially if resistant to intravenous calcium therapy.
- The goal of chronic management of primary hypoparathyroidism includes correcting the serum calcium level to a low-normal range, the serum phosphorus level to an upper-normal range, and prevention of hypercalciuria.
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Mr. Michael Edward Tierney of the School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia, for his linguistic editing of the manuscript.
- Jesus JE, Landry A. Images in clinical medicine. Chvostek’s and Trousseau’s signs. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:e15.
- Urbano FL. Signs of hypocalcemia: Chvostek’s and Trousseau’s. Hosp Physician 2000; 36:43–45.
- Chisthi MM, Nair RS, Kuttanchettiyar KG, Yadev I. Mechanisms behind post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia: interplay of calcitonin, parathormone, and albumin—a prospective study. J Invest Surg 2017; 30:217–225.
- Shoback DM, Bilezikian JP, Costa AG, et al. Presentation of hypoparathyroidism: etiologies and clinical features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2300–2312.
- Stack BC Jr, Bimston DN, Bodenner DL, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology disease state clinical review: postoperative hypoparathyroidism—definitions and management. Endocr Pract 2015; 21:674–685.
- Shoback D. Clinical practice. Hypoparathyroidism. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:391–403.
- Abate EG, Clarke BL. Review of hypoparathyroidism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017; 7:172.
- Coimbra C, Monteiro F, Oliveira P, Ribeiro L, de Almeida MG, Condé A. Hypoparathyroidism following thyroidectomy: predictive factors. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2017; 68:106–111.
- Thomusch O, Machens A, Sekulla C, Ukkat J, Brauckhoff M, Dralle H. The impact of surgical technique on postoperative hypoparathyroidism in bilateral thyroid surgery: a multivariate analysis of 5846 consecutive patients. Surgery 2003; 133:180–185.
- Hirsch PF, Lester GE, Talmage RV. Calcitonin, an enigmatic hormone: does it have a function? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2001; 1:299–305.
- Karne SS, Bhalerao NS. Carpal tunnel syndrome in hypothyroidism. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10:OC36–OC38.
- Duyff RF, Van den Bosch J, Laman DM, van Loon BJ, Linssen WH. Neuromuscular findings in thyroid dysfunction: a prospective clinical and electrodiagnostic study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68:750–755.
- Palumbo CF, Szabo RM, Olmsted SL. The effects of hypothyroidism and thyroid replacement on the development of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25:734–739.
- Katz JN, Stirrat CR, Larson MG, Fossel AH, Eaton HM, Liang MH. A self-administered hand symptom diagram for the diagnosis and epidemiologic study of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:1495–1498.
- Katz JN, Stirrat CR. A self-administered hand diagram for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1990; 15:360–363.
- Calfee RP, Dale AM, Ryan D, Descatha A, Franzblau A, Evanoff B. Performance of simplified scoring systems for hand diagrams in carpal tunnel syndrome screening. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37:10–17.
- D’Arcy CA, McGee S. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000; 283:3110–3117.
- Marchettini P, Lacerenza M, Mauri E, Marangoni C. Painful peripheral neuropathies. Curr Neuropharmacol 2006; 4:175–181.
- Kibirige D, Mwebaze R. Vitamin B12 deficiency among patients with diabetes mellitus: is routine screening and supplementation justified? J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013;12:17.
- Akinlade KS, Agbebaku SO, Rahamon SK, Balogun WO. Vitamin B12 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2015; 13:79–83.
- Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1993; 22:363–375.
- Macefield G, Burke D. Paraesthesiae and tetany induced by voluntary hyperventilation. Increased excitability of human cutaneous and motor axons. Brain 1991; 114:527–540.
- Benoit SR, Mendelsohn AB, Nourjah P, Staffa JA, Graham DJ. Risk factors for prolonged QTc among US adults: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005; 12:363–368.
- Khoo TK, Vege SS, Abu-Lebdeh HS, Ryu E, Nadeem S, Wermers RA. Acute pancreatitis in primary hyperparathyroidism: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:2115–2118.
- McKay C, Beastall GH, Imrie CW, Baxter JN. Circulating intact parathyroid hormone levels in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1994; 81:357–360.
- Talmage RV, Mobley HT. Calcium homeostasis: reassessment of the actions of parathyroid hormone. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2008; 156:1–8.
- Friedman PA, Gesek FA. Calcium transport in renal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1993; 264:F181–F198.
- Jensen PV, Jelstrup SM, Homøe P. Long-term outcomes after total thyroidectomy. Dan Med J 2015; 62:A5156.
- Ritter K, Elfenbein D, Schneider DF, Chen H, Sippel RS. Hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy: incidence and resolution. J Surg Res 2015; 197:348–353.
- Promberger R, Ott J, Kober F, Karik M, Freissmuth M, Hermann M. Normal parathyroid hormone levels do not exclude permanent hypoparathyroidism after thyroidectomy. Thyroid 2011; 21:145–150.
- Lorente-Poch L, Sancho JJ, Muñoz-Nova JL, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Sitges-Serra A. Defining the syndromes of parathyroid failure after total thyroidectomy. Gland Surgery 2015; 4:82–90.
- Cooper MS, Gittoes NJ. Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia. BMJ 2008; 336:1298–1302.
- Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Diagnosis and treatment of hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinologist 1996; 6:10–18.
- Carroll R, Matfin G. Endocrine and metabolic emergencies: hypocalcaemia. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2010; 1:29–33.
- Kim MP, Raho VJ, Mak J, Kaynar AM. Skin and soft tissue necrosis from calcium chloride in a deicer. J Emerg Med 2007; 32:41–44.
- Tong GM, Rude RK. Magnesium deficiency in critical illness. J Intensive Care Med 2005; 20:3–17.
- Cholst IN, Steinberg SF, Tropper PJ, Fox HE, Segre GV, Bilezikian JP. The influence of hypermagnesemia on serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels in human subjects. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:1221–1225.
- Ryzen E, Nelson TA, Rude RK. Low blood mononuclear cell magnesium content and hypocalcemia in normomagnesemic patients. West J Med 1987; 147:549–553.
- Koontz SL, Friedman SA, Schwartz ML. Symptomatic hypocalcemia after tocolytic therapy with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1773–1776.
- Brandi ML, Bilezikian JP, Shoback D, et al. Management of hypoparathyroidism: summary statement and guidelines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2273–2283.
- Porter RH, Cox BG, Heaney D, Hostetter TH, Stinebaugh BJ, Suki WN. Treatment of hypoparathyroid patients with chlorthalidone. N Engl J Med 1978; 298:577–581.
- Clarke BL, Brown EM, Collins MT, et al. Epidemiology and diagnosis of hypoparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2284–2299.
- Nijenhuis T, Vallon V, van der Kemp AW, Loffing J, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Enhanced passive Ca2+ reabsorption and reduced Mg2+ channel abundance explains thiazide-induced hypocalciuria and hypomagnesemia. J Clin Invest 2005; 115:1651–1658.
- Costanzo LS. Localization of diuretic action in microperfused rat distal tubules: Ca and Na transport. Am J Physiol 1985; 248:F527–F535.
- Brandi ML, Bilezikian JP, Shoback D, et al. Management of hypoparathyroidism: summary statement and guidelines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2273–2283.
- Scotti A, Bianchini C, Abbiati G, Marzo A. Absorption of calcium administered alone or in fixed combination with vitamin D to healthy volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung 2001; 51:493–500.
A 67-year-old woman presents to the emergency department after 8 weeks of progressive numbness and tingling in both hands, involving all fingers. The numbness has increased in severity in the last 3 days. She also has occasional numbness around her mouth. She reports no numbness in her feet.
She says she underwent thyroid surgery twice for thyroid cancer 10 years ago. Her medical history also includes type 2 diabetes mellitus (diagnosed 1 year ago), hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diastolic heart failure (diagnosed 5 years ago).
Her current medications are:
- Metformin 1 g twice a day
- Candesartan 16 mg once a day
- Atorvastatin 20 mg once a day
- Furosemide 40 mg twice a day
- Levothyroxine 100 μg per day
- Calcium carbonate 1,500 mg twice a day
- A vitamin D tablet twice a day, which she has not taken for the last 2 months.
She admits she has not been taking her medications regularly because she has been feeling depressed.
On physical examination, she is alert and oriented but appears anxious. She is not in respiratory distress. Her blood pressure is 150/90 mm Hg and her pulse is 92 beats per minute and regular. There is a thyroidectomy scar on the anterior neck. Her jugular venous pressure is not elevated. Her heart sounds are normal without extra sounds. She has no pulmonary rales and no lower-extremity edema.
The Phalen test and Tinel test for carpal tunnel syndrome are negative in both hands. Using a Katz hand diagram, the patient reports tingling and numbness in all fingers, both palms, and the dorsum of both hands. Tapping the area over the facial nerve does not elicit twitching of the facial muscles (ie, no Chvostek sign), but compression of the upper arm elicits carpal spasm (ie, positive Trousseau sign). There is no evidence of motor weakness in her hands. The rest of the physical examination is unremarkable.
POSSIBLE CAUSES OF NUMBNESS
1. Based on the initial evaluation, which of the following is the most likely cause of our patient’s bilateral hand numbness?
- Hypocalcemia due to primary hypoparathyroidism
- Carpal tunnel syndrome due to primary hypothyroidism
- Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
- Vitamin B12 deficiency due to metformin
- Hypocalcemia due to low serum calcitonin
All the conditions above except low serum calcitonin can cause bilateral hand paresthesia. Our patient most likely has hypocalcemia due to primary hypoparathyroidism.
Hypocalcemia
In our patient, bilateral hand numbness and perioral numbness after stopping vitamin D and a positive Trousseau sign strongly suggest hypocalcemia. The classic physical findings in patients with hypocalcemia are the Trousseau sign and the Chvostek sign. The Trousseau sign is elicited by inflating a blood pressure cuff above the systolic blood pressure for 3 minutes and observing for ischemia-induced carpopedal spasm, wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint flexion, thumb adduction, and interphalangeal joint extension. The Chvostek sign is elicited by tapping over the area of the facial nerve below the zygoma in front of the tragus, resulting in ipsilateral twitching of facial muscles.
Although the Trousseau sign is more sensitive and specific than the Chvostek sign, neither is pathognomonic for hypocalcemia.1 The Chvostek sign has been reported to be negative in 30% of patients with hypocalcemia and positive in 10% of normocalcemic individuals.1 The Trousseau sign, however, is present in 94% of hypocalcemic patients vs 1% of normocalcemic individuals.2
Primary hypoparathyroidism secondary to thyroidectomy. Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism is the most common cause of primary hypoparathyroidism. It results from ischemic injury or accidental removal of the parathyroid glands during anterior neck surgery.3,4 The consequent hypocalcemia can be transient, intermittent, or permanent. Permanent postsurgical hypoparathyroidism is defined as persistent hypocalcemia with insufficient parathyroid hormone (PTH) for more than 12 months after neck surgery; however, some consider 6 months to be enough to define the condition.5–7
The incidence of postsurgical hypoparathyroidism varies considerably with the extent of thyroid surgery and the experience of the surgeon.6,8 In the hands of experienced surgeons, permanent hypoparathyroidism occurs in fewer than 1% of patients after total thyroidectomy, whereas the rate may be higher than 6% with less-experienced surgeons.5,9 Other risk factors for postsurgical hypoparathyroidism include female sex, autoimmune thyroid disease, pregnancy, and lactation.5
Pseudohypoparathyroidism is a group of disorders characterized by renal resistance to PTH, leading to hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and elevated serum PTH. It is also associated with phenotypic features such as short stature and short fourth metacarpal bones.
Calcitonin deficiency. Calcitonin is a polypeptide hormone secreted from the parafollicular (C) cells of the thyroid gland. After total thyroidectomy, calcitonin levels are expected to be reduced. However, the role of calcitonin in humans is unclear. One study has shown that calcitonin is possibly a vestigial hormone, given that no calcitonin-related disorders (excess or deficiency) have been reported in humans.10
Carpal tunnel syndrome due to hypothyroidism
Our patient also could have primary hypothyroidism as a result of thyroidectomy. Hypothyroidism can cause bilateral hand numbness due to carpal tunnel syndrome, which is mediated by mucopolysaccharide deposition and synovial membrane swelling.11 One study reported that 29% of patients with hypothyroidism had carpal tunnel syndrome.12 Symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome in hypothyroid patients may occur despite thyroid replacement therapy.13
Carpal tunnel syndrome is a clinical diagnosis. Patients usually experience hand paresthesia in the distribution of the median nerve. Provocative physical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome include the Tinel test, the Phalen test, and the Katz hand diagram, which is considered the best of the 3 tests.14,15 Based on how the patient marks the location and type of symptoms on the diagram, carpal tunnel syndrome is rated as classic, probable, possible, or unlikely (Table 1).14,16,17 The sensitivity of a classic or probable diagram ranges from 64% to 80%, while the specificity ranges from 73% to 90%.14,15
Carpal tunnel syndrome is less likely to be the cause of our patient’s symptoms, as her Katz hand diagram indicates only “possible” carpal tunnel syndrome. Her perioral numbness and positive Trousseau sign make hypocalcemia a more likely cause.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Sensory peripheral neuropathy is a recognized complication of diabetes mellitus. However, neuropathy in diabetic patients most commonly manifests initially as distal symmetrical ascending neuropathy starting in the lower extremities.18 Therefore, diabetic peripheral neuropathy is less likely in this patient since her symptoms are limited to her hands.
Vitamin B12 deficiency
Metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency is another possible cause of peripheral neuropathy. It might be secondary to metformin-induced changes in intrinsic factor levels and small-intestine motility with resultant bacterial overgrowth, as well as inhibition of vitamin B12 absorption in the terminal ileum.19
However, metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency is not the most likely cause of our patient’s neuropathy, since she has been taking this drug for only 1 year. Vitamin B12 deficiency with consequent peripheral neuropathy is more likely in patients taking metformin in high doses for 10 or more years.20
Laboratory results and electrocardiography
Table 2 shows the patient’s initial laboratory results. Of note, her serum calcium level is 5.7 mg/dL (reference range 8.9–10.1). Electrocardiography in the emergency department shows:
- Prolonged PR interval (23 msec)
- Wide QRS complexes (13 msec)
- Flat T waves
- Prolonged corrected QT interval (475 msec)
- Occasional premature ventricular complexes.
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF HYPOCALCEMIA
2. Which of the following is not a manifestation of hypocalcemia?
- Tonic-clonic seizures
- Cyanosis
- Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias
- Acute pancreatitis
- Depression
Hypocalcemia can cause a wide range of clinical manifestations (Table 3), the extent and severity of which depend on the severity of hypocalcemia and how quickly it develops. The more acute the hypocalcemia, the more severe the manifestations.21
Tetany can cause seizures
Hypocalcemia is characterized by neuromuscular hyperexcitability, manifested clinically by tetany.22 Manifestations of tetany are numerous and include acral paresthesia, perioral numbness, muscle cramps, carpopedal spasm, and seizures. Tetany is the hallmark of hypocalcemia regardless of etiology. However, certain causes are associated with peculiar clinical manifestations. For example, chronic primary hypoparathyroidism may be associated with basal ganglia calcifications that can result in parkinsonism, other extrapyramidal disorders, and dementia (Table 4).6
Airway spasm can be fatal
A serious manifestation of acute severe hypocalcemia is spasm of the glottis muscles, which may cause cyanosis and, if untreated, death.21
Ventricular arrhythmias
Another potential fatal complication of acute severe hypocalcemia is polymorphic ventricular tachycardia due to prolongation of the QT interval, which is readily identified with electrocardiography.23
Hypocalcemia does not cause pancreatitis
Hypercalcemia, rather than hypocalcemia, may cause acute pancreatitis.24 Conversely, acute pancreatitis may cause hypocalcemia due to precipitation of calcium in the abdominal cavity.25
Psychiatric manifestations
In addition to depression, hypocalcemia is associated with psychiatric manifestations including anxiety, confusion, and emotional instability.
STEPS TO DIAGNOSIS OF HYPOCALCEMIA
First step: Confirm true hypocalcemia
Calcium circulates in the blood in 3 forms: bound to albumin (40% to 45%), bound to anions (10% to 15%), and free (ionized) (45%). Although ionized calcium is the active form, most laboratories report total serum calcium.
Since changes in serum albumin concentration affect the total serum calcium level, it is imperative to correct the measured serum calcium to the serum albumin concentration. Each 1-g/dL decrease in serum albumin lowers the total serum calcium by 0.8 mg/dL. Thus:
Corrected serum calcium (mg/dL) =
measured total serum calcium (mg/dL) +
0.8 (4 − serum albumin [g/dL]).
If the patient’s serum calcium level remains low when corrected for serum albumin, he or she has true hypocalcemia, which implies a low ionized serum calcium. Conversely, pseudohypocalcemia means that the measured calcium level is low but the corrected serum calcium is normal.
Using this formula, our patient’s corrected calcium level is calculated as 5.7 + 0.8 (4 – 3.2) = 6.3 mg/dL, indicating true hypocalcemia.
PHOSPHATE IS OFTEN HIGH WHEN CALCIUM IS LOW
In addition to hypocalcemia, our patient has an elevated phosphate level (Table 2).
3. Which of the following hypocalcemic disorders is not associated with hyperphosphatemia?
- End-stage renal disease
- Primary hypoparathyroidism
- Pseudohypoparathyroidism
- Vitamin D3 deficiency
- Rhabdomyolysis
Vitamin D deficiency is not associated with hyperphosphatemia.
Second step in evaluating hypocalcemia: Check phosphate, magnesium, creatinine
The major causes of hypocalcemia can be categorized according to the serum phosphate level: high vs normal or low (Table 5).
High-phosphate, low-calcium states. In the absence of concurrent end-stage renal disease and an excessive phosphate load, primary hypoparathyroidism is the most likely cause of hypocalcemia associated with hyperphosphatemia.
PTH increases serum ionized calcium by26,27:
- Increasing bone resorption
- Increasing reabsorption of calcium from the distal renal tubules
- Increasing the activity of 1-alpha-hydroxylase, responsible for conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (the most biologically active vitamin D metabolite); 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increases the absorption of calcium and phosphate from the intestine.
Conversely, PTH decreases reabsorption of phosphate from proximal renal tubules, resulting in hypophosphatemia. Therefore, low serum PTH (primary hypoparathyroidism) or a PTH-resistant state (pseudohypoparathyroidism) results in hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia.26,27
Both end-stage renal disease and rhabdomyolysis are associated with high serum phosphate levels. The kidney normally excretes excess dietary phosphate to maintain phosphate homeostasis; however, this is impaired in end-stage renal disease, leading to hyperphosphatemia. In rhabdomyolysis, it is mainly the transcellular shift of phosphate into the extracellular space from myocyte injury that raises phosphate levels.
Normal- or low-phosphate, low calcium states. Hypocalcemia can also result from vitamin D deficiency, but this cause is associated with a low or normal serum phosphate level. In such cases, hypocalcemia causes secondary hyperparathyroidism with consequent renal phosphate loss and, thus, hypophosphatemia.27
Third step: Check serum intact PTH and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
Hypocalcemia stimulates secretion of PTH. Therefore, hypocalcemia with elevated serum PTH is caused by disorders that do not impair PTH secretion, including chronic renal failure and vitamin D deficiency (Table 5). Conversely, hypocalcemia with low or normal serum PTH levels suggests primary hypoparathyroidism.
Our patient’s serum PTH level is 20 ng/mL, which is within the reference range. This does not discount the diagnosis of primary hypoparathyroidism. Although most patients with primary hypoparathyroidism have low or undetectable serum PTH levels, some have normal PTH levels if some degree of PTH production is preserved.5,7,28–30 In these patients, the remaining functioning parathyroid tissue is not enough to maintain a normal serum calcium level, resulting in hypocalcemia. As a result, hypocalcemia stimulates the remaining parathyroid tissue to its maximum output, producing PTH levels usually within the lower or middle-normal range.30 In such patients, the terms parathyroid insufficiency and relative primary hypoparathyroidism are more precise than primary hypoparathyroidism.
Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism with an inappropriately normal PTH level is usually seen in patients with disorders that impair intestinal calcium absorption or bone resorption.31 In our patient’s case, the “normal” serum PTH level is likely due to maximal stimulation of remaining functioning parathyroid tissue by severe hypocalcemia, which is a result of her discontinuation of calcium and calcitriol therapy and her vitamin D deficiency.
CASE RESUMED: NO RESPONSE TO INTRAVENOUS CALCIUM GLUCONATE
The patient is given 2 10-mL ampules of 10% calcium gluconate diluted in 100 mL of 5% dextrose in water over 20 minutes intravenously. Electrocardiographic monitoring is continued. Two hours later, her measured serum calcium is only 5.8 mg/dL, with no improvement in her symptoms.
A continuous infusion of calcium gluconate is started: 12 ampules of calcium gluconate are added to 380 mL of 5% dextrose in water and infused at 40 mL/hour (infused rate of elemental calcium = 1.3 mg/kg/hour); 3 hours later, her measured serum calcium level is still only 5.8 mg//dL; at 6 hours it is 5.9 mg/dL, and her symptoms have not improved.
4. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
- Change the calcium gluconate to calcium chloride
- Increase the infusion rate to 1.5 mg of elemental calcium/kg/hour
- Give a bolus of 2 10-mL ampules of 10% calcium gluconate intravenously over 1 minute
- Give additional oral calcium tablets
- Check the serum magnesium level
Treatment of hypocalcemia can involve intravenous or oral calcium therapy.
Intravenous calcium is indicated for patients with any of the following6,32:
- Moderate to severe neuromuscular irritability (eg, acral paresthesia, carpopedal spasm, prolonged QT interval, seizures, laryngospasm, bronchospasm)
- Acute hypocalcemia with corrected serum calcium level less than 7.6 mg/dL, even if the patient is asymptomatic
- Cardiac failure.
One 10-mL ampule of 10% calcium gluconate contains 93 mg of elemental calcium; 1 or 2 ampules are typically diluted in 50 to 100 mL of 5% dextrose in water and infused slowly over 15 to 20 minutes. Rapid administration of intravenous calcium is contraindicated, as it may produce cardiac arrhythmias and possibly cardiac arrest. Therefore, intravenous calcium should be given slowly while continuing electrocardiographic monitoring.33
Since the effect of 1 ampule of calcium gluconate lasts only 2 to 3 hours, most patients with symptomatic hypocalcemia require continuous intravenous calcium infusion. The recommended dose of infused elemental calcium is 0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/hour.34 Several ampules are added to 500 to 1,000 mL of 5% dextrose in water or 0.9% normal saline and infused at a rate appropriate for the patient’s corrected calcium and symptoms.
Oral calcium and vitamin D supplements can be given initially to patients with a corrected serum calcium level of 7.6 mg/dL or greater, with or without mild symptoms, if they can tolerate oral intake. However, this is not the treatment of choice for resistant acute hypocalcemia, as in this case.
Calcium chloride has no advantages over calcium gluconate. Further, it can be associated with local irritation and may result in tissue necrosis if extravasation occurs.35
Increasing the infusion rate of calcium gluconate to the maximum recommended dose may improve the patient’s ionized calcium level and symptoms somewhat. However, it is not the best option for this patient, given that she did not respond to 2 ampules of calcium gluconate followed by continuous infusion of 1.3 mg/kg/hour for 6 hours.
Calcium gluconate bolus. Similarly, giving the patient an additional 2 ampules of calcium gluconate over 1 minute would not be recommended, as rapid administration of intravenous calcium gluconate (eg, over 1 minute) is contraindicated.
Check magnesium
If hypocalcemia persists despite intravenous calcium therapy, as in our patient, further investigation or action is required. An important cause of persistent hypocalcemia is severe hypomagnesemia. Severe hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium < 0.8 mg/dL) causes resistant hypocalcemia by several mechanisms:
- Inducing PTH resistance32,36,37
- Decreasing PTH secretion32,36
- Decreasing calcitriol production.
The decrease in calcitriol production is a direct effect of hypomagnesemia, but it is also an indirect effect of low PTH secretion, which inhibits the enzyme 1-alpha-hydroxylase. Thus, conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to calcitriol is impaired, leading to low calcitriol production.
Our patient could have hypomagnesemia due to furosemide use and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Hypocalcemia resistant to calcium therapy may occasionally respond to magnesium therapy even if the serum magnesium level is normal. This may be due to depleted intracellular magnesium salt levels.6,38 Rarely, severe hypermagnesemia can also be associated with hypocalcemia due to inhibition of PTH secretion.37,39
CASE RESUMED
Our patient’s serum magnesium level is 0.6 mg/dL (reference range 1.7–2.4 mg/dL). She is given 2 g of magnesium sulfate in 60 mL of 0.9% normal saline infused over 1 hour, followed by a continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate (12 g diluted in 250 mL of 0.9% normal saline, infused over 24 hours). On repeat testing 4 hours later, her serum magnesium level is 0.7 mg/dL, and at 8 hours later it is 0.9 mg/dL. She is subsequently started on oral magnesium oxide 600 mg per day. The magnesium sulfate infusion is continued for another 24 hours.
PREVENTING HYPERCALCIURIA
Patients with low PTH (primary hypoparathyroidism) may have hypercalciuria due to decreased renal tubular calcium reabsorption. Two important measures can minimize hypercalciuria in such patients:
- Keeping the serum calcium level in the low-normal range4,5,40
- Giving a thiazide diuretic (eg, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5–50 mg daily) with a low-salt diet.41,42
A thiazide diuretic is usually started once the 24-hour urine calcium reaches 250 mg.6 Thiazides are thought to enhance both proximal and distal renal tubular calcium reabsorption.43,44
PRIMARY HYPOPARATHYROIDISM: LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT
Long-term management of primary hypoparathyroidism requires calcium and vitamin D supplementation.
Calcium supplements. The most commonly prescribed calcium preparations are calcium carbonate and calcium citrate (containing 40% and 20% elemental calcium, respectively). Calcium carbonate, which is less expensive than calcium citrate, binds with phosphate intake and requires an acidic environment for absorption, and so it is better absorbed when taken with meals. Because calcium citrate does not require an acidic environment for absorption, it is the calcium preparation of choice for patients on proton pump inhibitors, or patients with achlorhydria or constipation.45 Calcium doses vary widely, with most hypoparathyroid patients requiring 1 to 2 g of elemental calcium daily.6
Vitamin D supplements. To promote intestinal absorption, calcium is combined with vitamin D in a fixed-dose preparation given in divided doses.46 Calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) is the most active metabolite of vitamin D, with rapid onset and offset of action, and it is the preferred form of vitamin D therapy for patients with hypoparathyroidism. If calcitriol is not available or is not affordable, alphacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3) is another option. This is a synthetic analogue of vitamin D that is already hyroxylated at the C1 position. After oral intake, it is hydroxylated in the liver to form calcitriol.
Since renal production of calcitriol is PTH-dependent, in hypoparathyroidism the conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to calcitriol is limited. Therefore, vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) are not the preferred forms of vitamin D for such patients. However, either can be added to calcitriol, as they may have extraskeletal benefits.7
CASE CONCLUDED
Our patient presented with primary parathyroid insufficiency associated with vitamin D deficiency. Therefore, in addition to calcitriol and calcium combined with vitamin D in a fixed-dose preparation, her management included vitamin D3 for her vitamin D deficiency.
She was discharged on these medications. At a follow-up visit 3 weeks later, her measured serum calcium level was 8.6 mg/dL. She reported gradual resolution of her symptoms. She was also referred to a psychiatrist for her depression.
TAKE-HOME POINTS
- Hypocalcemia causes neuromuscular excitability, manifested clinically by tetany.
- Common causes of hypocalcemia include vitamin D deficiency, hypomagnesemia, renal failure, and primary hypoparathyroidism.
- The first step in evaluating hypocalcemia is to correct the measured serum calcium to the serum albumin concentration.
- Laboratory testing for hypocalcemia should include serum phosphorus, magnesium, creatinine, PTH, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.
- Primary hypoparathyroidism is characterized by hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and low serum PTH.
- Moderate to severe manifestations of hypo-
calcemia and acute hypocalcemia (< 7.6 mg/dL), even if asymptomatic, warrant intravenous calcium therapy. - Correction of hypomagnesemia is essential to treat hypocalcemia, especially if resistant to intravenous calcium therapy.
- The goal of chronic management of primary hypoparathyroidism includes correcting the serum calcium level to a low-normal range, the serum phosphorus level to an upper-normal range, and prevention of hypercalciuria.
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Mr. Michael Edward Tierney of the School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia, for his linguistic editing of the manuscript.
A 67-year-old woman presents to the emergency department after 8 weeks of progressive numbness and tingling in both hands, involving all fingers. The numbness has increased in severity in the last 3 days. She also has occasional numbness around her mouth. She reports no numbness in her feet.
She says she underwent thyroid surgery twice for thyroid cancer 10 years ago. Her medical history also includes type 2 diabetes mellitus (diagnosed 1 year ago), hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diastolic heart failure (diagnosed 5 years ago).
Her current medications are:
- Metformin 1 g twice a day
- Candesartan 16 mg once a day
- Atorvastatin 20 mg once a day
- Furosemide 40 mg twice a day
- Levothyroxine 100 μg per day
- Calcium carbonate 1,500 mg twice a day
- A vitamin D tablet twice a day, which she has not taken for the last 2 months.
She admits she has not been taking her medications regularly because she has been feeling depressed.
On physical examination, she is alert and oriented but appears anxious. She is not in respiratory distress. Her blood pressure is 150/90 mm Hg and her pulse is 92 beats per minute and regular. There is a thyroidectomy scar on the anterior neck. Her jugular venous pressure is not elevated. Her heart sounds are normal without extra sounds. She has no pulmonary rales and no lower-extremity edema.
The Phalen test and Tinel test for carpal tunnel syndrome are negative in both hands. Using a Katz hand diagram, the patient reports tingling and numbness in all fingers, both palms, and the dorsum of both hands. Tapping the area over the facial nerve does not elicit twitching of the facial muscles (ie, no Chvostek sign), but compression of the upper arm elicits carpal spasm (ie, positive Trousseau sign). There is no evidence of motor weakness in her hands. The rest of the physical examination is unremarkable.
POSSIBLE CAUSES OF NUMBNESS
1. Based on the initial evaluation, which of the following is the most likely cause of our patient’s bilateral hand numbness?
- Hypocalcemia due to primary hypoparathyroidism
- Carpal tunnel syndrome due to primary hypothyroidism
- Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
- Vitamin B12 deficiency due to metformin
- Hypocalcemia due to low serum calcitonin
All the conditions above except low serum calcitonin can cause bilateral hand paresthesia. Our patient most likely has hypocalcemia due to primary hypoparathyroidism.
Hypocalcemia
In our patient, bilateral hand numbness and perioral numbness after stopping vitamin D and a positive Trousseau sign strongly suggest hypocalcemia. The classic physical findings in patients with hypocalcemia are the Trousseau sign and the Chvostek sign. The Trousseau sign is elicited by inflating a blood pressure cuff above the systolic blood pressure for 3 minutes and observing for ischemia-induced carpopedal spasm, wrist and metacarpophalangeal joint flexion, thumb adduction, and interphalangeal joint extension. The Chvostek sign is elicited by tapping over the area of the facial nerve below the zygoma in front of the tragus, resulting in ipsilateral twitching of facial muscles.
Although the Trousseau sign is more sensitive and specific than the Chvostek sign, neither is pathognomonic for hypocalcemia.1 The Chvostek sign has been reported to be negative in 30% of patients with hypocalcemia and positive in 10% of normocalcemic individuals.1 The Trousseau sign, however, is present in 94% of hypocalcemic patients vs 1% of normocalcemic individuals.2
Primary hypoparathyroidism secondary to thyroidectomy. Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism is the most common cause of primary hypoparathyroidism. It results from ischemic injury or accidental removal of the parathyroid glands during anterior neck surgery.3,4 The consequent hypocalcemia can be transient, intermittent, or permanent. Permanent postsurgical hypoparathyroidism is defined as persistent hypocalcemia with insufficient parathyroid hormone (PTH) for more than 12 months after neck surgery; however, some consider 6 months to be enough to define the condition.5–7
The incidence of postsurgical hypoparathyroidism varies considerably with the extent of thyroid surgery and the experience of the surgeon.6,8 In the hands of experienced surgeons, permanent hypoparathyroidism occurs in fewer than 1% of patients after total thyroidectomy, whereas the rate may be higher than 6% with less-experienced surgeons.5,9 Other risk factors for postsurgical hypoparathyroidism include female sex, autoimmune thyroid disease, pregnancy, and lactation.5
Pseudohypoparathyroidism is a group of disorders characterized by renal resistance to PTH, leading to hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and elevated serum PTH. It is also associated with phenotypic features such as short stature and short fourth metacarpal bones.
Calcitonin deficiency. Calcitonin is a polypeptide hormone secreted from the parafollicular (C) cells of the thyroid gland. After total thyroidectomy, calcitonin levels are expected to be reduced. However, the role of calcitonin in humans is unclear. One study has shown that calcitonin is possibly a vestigial hormone, given that no calcitonin-related disorders (excess or deficiency) have been reported in humans.10
Carpal tunnel syndrome due to hypothyroidism
Our patient also could have primary hypothyroidism as a result of thyroidectomy. Hypothyroidism can cause bilateral hand numbness due to carpal tunnel syndrome, which is mediated by mucopolysaccharide deposition and synovial membrane swelling.11 One study reported that 29% of patients with hypothyroidism had carpal tunnel syndrome.12 Symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome in hypothyroid patients may occur despite thyroid replacement therapy.13
Carpal tunnel syndrome is a clinical diagnosis. Patients usually experience hand paresthesia in the distribution of the median nerve. Provocative physical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome include the Tinel test, the Phalen test, and the Katz hand diagram, which is considered the best of the 3 tests.14,15 Based on how the patient marks the location and type of symptoms on the diagram, carpal tunnel syndrome is rated as classic, probable, possible, or unlikely (Table 1).14,16,17 The sensitivity of a classic or probable diagram ranges from 64% to 80%, while the specificity ranges from 73% to 90%.14,15
Carpal tunnel syndrome is less likely to be the cause of our patient’s symptoms, as her Katz hand diagram indicates only “possible” carpal tunnel syndrome. Her perioral numbness and positive Trousseau sign make hypocalcemia a more likely cause.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Sensory peripheral neuropathy is a recognized complication of diabetes mellitus. However, neuropathy in diabetic patients most commonly manifests initially as distal symmetrical ascending neuropathy starting in the lower extremities.18 Therefore, diabetic peripheral neuropathy is less likely in this patient since her symptoms are limited to her hands.
Vitamin B12 deficiency
Metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency is another possible cause of peripheral neuropathy. It might be secondary to metformin-induced changes in intrinsic factor levels and small-intestine motility with resultant bacterial overgrowth, as well as inhibition of vitamin B12 absorption in the terminal ileum.19
However, metformin-induced vitamin B12 deficiency is not the most likely cause of our patient’s neuropathy, since she has been taking this drug for only 1 year. Vitamin B12 deficiency with consequent peripheral neuropathy is more likely in patients taking metformin in high doses for 10 or more years.20
Laboratory results and electrocardiography
Table 2 shows the patient’s initial laboratory results. Of note, her serum calcium level is 5.7 mg/dL (reference range 8.9–10.1). Electrocardiography in the emergency department shows:
- Prolonged PR interval (23 msec)
- Wide QRS complexes (13 msec)
- Flat T waves
- Prolonged corrected QT interval (475 msec)
- Occasional premature ventricular complexes.
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF HYPOCALCEMIA
2. Which of the following is not a manifestation of hypocalcemia?
- Tonic-clonic seizures
- Cyanosis
- Cardiac ventricular arrhythmias
- Acute pancreatitis
- Depression
Hypocalcemia can cause a wide range of clinical manifestations (Table 3), the extent and severity of which depend on the severity of hypocalcemia and how quickly it develops. The more acute the hypocalcemia, the more severe the manifestations.21
Tetany can cause seizures
Hypocalcemia is characterized by neuromuscular hyperexcitability, manifested clinically by tetany.22 Manifestations of tetany are numerous and include acral paresthesia, perioral numbness, muscle cramps, carpopedal spasm, and seizures. Tetany is the hallmark of hypocalcemia regardless of etiology. However, certain causes are associated with peculiar clinical manifestations. For example, chronic primary hypoparathyroidism may be associated with basal ganglia calcifications that can result in parkinsonism, other extrapyramidal disorders, and dementia (Table 4).6
Airway spasm can be fatal
A serious manifestation of acute severe hypocalcemia is spasm of the glottis muscles, which may cause cyanosis and, if untreated, death.21
Ventricular arrhythmias
Another potential fatal complication of acute severe hypocalcemia is polymorphic ventricular tachycardia due to prolongation of the QT interval, which is readily identified with electrocardiography.23
Hypocalcemia does not cause pancreatitis
Hypercalcemia, rather than hypocalcemia, may cause acute pancreatitis.24 Conversely, acute pancreatitis may cause hypocalcemia due to precipitation of calcium in the abdominal cavity.25
Psychiatric manifestations
In addition to depression, hypocalcemia is associated with psychiatric manifestations including anxiety, confusion, and emotional instability.
STEPS TO DIAGNOSIS OF HYPOCALCEMIA
First step: Confirm true hypocalcemia
Calcium circulates in the blood in 3 forms: bound to albumin (40% to 45%), bound to anions (10% to 15%), and free (ionized) (45%). Although ionized calcium is the active form, most laboratories report total serum calcium.
Since changes in serum albumin concentration affect the total serum calcium level, it is imperative to correct the measured serum calcium to the serum albumin concentration. Each 1-g/dL decrease in serum albumin lowers the total serum calcium by 0.8 mg/dL. Thus:
Corrected serum calcium (mg/dL) =
measured total serum calcium (mg/dL) +
0.8 (4 − serum albumin [g/dL]).
If the patient’s serum calcium level remains low when corrected for serum albumin, he or she has true hypocalcemia, which implies a low ionized serum calcium. Conversely, pseudohypocalcemia means that the measured calcium level is low but the corrected serum calcium is normal.
Using this formula, our patient’s corrected calcium level is calculated as 5.7 + 0.8 (4 – 3.2) = 6.3 mg/dL, indicating true hypocalcemia.
PHOSPHATE IS OFTEN HIGH WHEN CALCIUM IS LOW
In addition to hypocalcemia, our patient has an elevated phosphate level (Table 2).
3. Which of the following hypocalcemic disorders is not associated with hyperphosphatemia?
- End-stage renal disease
- Primary hypoparathyroidism
- Pseudohypoparathyroidism
- Vitamin D3 deficiency
- Rhabdomyolysis
Vitamin D deficiency is not associated with hyperphosphatemia.
Second step in evaluating hypocalcemia: Check phosphate, magnesium, creatinine
The major causes of hypocalcemia can be categorized according to the serum phosphate level: high vs normal or low (Table 5).
High-phosphate, low-calcium states. In the absence of concurrent end-stage renal disease and an excessive phosphate load, primary hypoparathyroidism is the most likely cause of hypocalcemia associated with hyperphosphatemia.
PTH increases serum ionized calcium by26,27:
- Increasing bone resorption
- Increasing reabsorption of calcium from the distal renal tubules
- Increasing the activity of 1-alpha-hydroxylase, responsible for conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (the most biologically active vitamin D metabolite); 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increases the absorption of calcium and phosphate from the intestine.
Conversely, PTH decreases reabsorption of phosphate from proximal renal tubules, resulting in hypophosphatemia. Therefore, low serum PTH (primary hypoparathyroidism) or a PTH-resistant state (pseudohypoparathyroidism) results in hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia.26,27
Both end-stage renal disease and rhabdomyolysis are associated with high serum phosphate levels. The kidney normally excretes excess dietary phosphate to maintain phosphate homeostasis; however, this is impaired in end-stage renal disease, leading to hyperphosphatemia. In rhabdomyolysis, it is mainly the transcellular shift of phosphate into the extracellular space from myocyte injury that raises phosphate levels.
Normal- or low-phosphate, low calcium states. Hypocalcemia can also result from vitamin D deficiency, but this cause is associated with a low or normal serum phosphate level. In such cases, hypocalcemia causes secondary hyperparathyroidism with consequent renal phosphate loss and, thus, hypophosphatemia.27
Third step: Check serum intact PTH and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
Hypocalcemia stimulates secretion of PTH. Therefore, hypocalcemia with elevated serum PTH is caused by disorders that do not impair PTH secretion, including chronic renal failure and vitamin D deficiency (Table 5). Conversely, hypocalcemia with low or normal serum PTH levels suggests primary hypoparathyroidism.
Our patient’s serum PTH level is 20 ng/mL, which is within the reference range. This does not discount the diagnosis of primary hypoparathyroidism. Although most patients with primary hypoparathyroidism have low or undetectable serum PTH levels, some have normal PTH levels if some degree of PTH production is preserved.5,7,28–30 In these patients, the remaining functioning parathyroid tissue is not enough to maintain a normal serum calcium level, resulting in hypocalcemia. As a result, hypocalcemia stimulates the remaining parathyroid tissue to its maximum output, producing PTH levels usually within the lower or middle-normal range.30 In such patients, the terms parathyroid insufficiency and relative primary hypoparathyroidism are more precise than primary hypoparathyroidism.
Postsurgical hypoparathyroidism with an inappropriately normal PTH level is usually seen in patients with disorders that impair intestinal calcium absorption or bone resorption.31 In our patient’s case, the “normal” serum PTH level is likely due to maximal stimulation of remaining functioning parathyroid tissue by severe hypocalcemia, which is a result of her discontinuation of calcium and calcitriol therapy and her vitamin D deficiency.
CASE RESUMED: NO RESPONSE TO INTRAVENOUS CALCIUM GLUCONATE
The patient is given 2 10-mL ampules of 10% calcium gluconate diluted in 100 mL of 5% dextrose in water over 20 minutes intravenously. Electrocardiographic monitoring is continued. Two hours later, her measured serum calcium is only 5.8 mg/dL, with no improvement in her symptoms.
A continuous infusion of calcium gluconate is started: 12 ampules of calcium gluconate are added to 380 mL of 5% dextrose in water and infused at 40 mL/hour (infused rate of elemental calcium = 1.3 mg/kg/hour); 3 hours later, her measured serum calcium level is still only 5.8 mg//dL; at 6 hours it is 5.9 mg/dL, and her symptoms have not improved.
4. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
- Change the calcium gluconate to calcium chloride
- Increase the infusion rate to 1.5 mg of elemental calcium/kg/hour
- Give a bolus of 2 10-mL ampules of 10% calcium gluconate intravenously over 1 minute
- Give additional oral calcium tablets
- Check the serum magnesium level
Treatment of hypocalcemia can involve intravenous or oral calcium therapy.
Intravenous calcium is indicated for patients with any of the following6,32:
- Moderate to severe neuromuscular irritability (eg, acral paresthesia, carpopedal spasm, prolonged QT interval, seizures, laryngospasm, bronchospasm)
- Acute hypocalcemia with corrected serum calcium level less than 7.6 mg/dL, even if the patient is asymptomatic
- Cardiac failure.
One 10-mL ampule of 10% calcium gluconate contains 93 mg of elemental calcium; 1 or 2 ampules are typically diluted in 50 to 100 mL of 5% dextrose in water and infused slowly over 15 to 20 minutes. Rapid administration of intravenous calcium is contraindicated, as it may produce cardiac arrhythmias and possibly cardiac arrest. Therefore, intravenous calcium should be given slowly while continuing electrocardiographic monitoring.33
Since the effect of 1 ampule of calcium gluconate lasts only 2 to 3 hours, most patients with symptomatic hypocalcemia require continuous intravenous calcium infusion. The recommended dose of infused elemental calcium is 0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/hour.34 Several ampules are added to 500 to 1,000 mL of 5% dextrose in water or 0.9% normal saline and infused at a rate appropriate for the patient’s corrected calcium and symptoms.
Oral calcium and vitamin D supplements can be given initially to patients with a corrected serum calcium level of 7.6 mg/dL or greater, with or without mild symptoms, if they can tolerate oral intake. However, this is not the treatment of choice for resistant acute hypocalcemia, as in this case.
Calcium chloride has no advantages over calcium gluconate. Further, it can be associated with local irritation and may result in tissue necrosis if extravasation occurs.35
Increasing the infusion rate of calcium gluconate to the maximum recommended dose may improve the patient’s ionized calcium level and symptoms somewhat. However, it is not the best option for this patient, given that she did not respond to 2 ampules of calcium gluconate followed by continuous infusion of 1.3 mg/kg/hour for 6 hours.
Calcium gluconate bolus. Similarly, giving the patient an additional 2 ampules of calcium gluconate over 1 minute would not be recommended, as rapid administration of intravenous calcium gluconate (eg, over 1 minute) is contraindicated.
Check magnesium
If hypocalcemia persists despite intravenous calcium therapy, as in our patient, further investigation or action is required. An important cause of persistent hypocalcemia is severe hypomagnesemia. Severe hypomagnesemia (serum magnesium < 0.8 mg/dL) causes resistant hypocalcemia by several mechanisms:
- Inducing PTH resistance32,36,37
- Decreasing PTH secretion32,36
- Decreasing calcitriol production.
The decrease in calcitriol production is a direct effect of hypomagnesemia, but it is also an indirect effect of low PTH secretion, which inhibits the enzyme 1-alpha-hydroxylase. Thus, conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to calcitriol is impaired, leading to low calcitriol production.
Our patient could have hypomagnesemia due to furosemide use and uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Hypocalcemia resistant to calcium therapy may occasionally respond to magnesium therapy even if the serum magnesium level is normal. This may be due to depleted intracellular magnesium salt levels.6,38 Rarely, severe hypermagnesemia can also be associated with hypocalcemia due to inhibition of PTH secretion.37,39
CASE RESUMED
Our patient’s serum magnesium level is 0.6 mg/dL (reference range 1.7–2.4 mg/dL). She is given 2 g of magnesium sulfate in 60 mL of 0.9% normal saline infused over 1 hour, followed by a continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate (12 g diluted in 250 mL of 0.9% normal saline, infused over 24 hours). On repeat testing 4 hours later, her serum magnesium level is 0.7 mg/dL, and at 8 hours later it is 0.9 mg/dL. She is subsequently started on oral magnesium oxide 600 mg per day. The magnesium sulfate infusion is continued for another 24 hours.
PREVENTING HYPERCALCIURIA
Patients with low PTH (primary hypoparathyroidism) may have hypercalciuria due to decreased renal tubular calcium reabsorption. Two important measures can minimize hypercalciuria in such patients:
- Keeping the serum calcium level in the low-normal range4,5,40
- Giving a thiazide diuretic (eg, hydrochlorothiazide 12.5–50 mg daily) with a low-salt diet.41,42
A thiazide diuretic is usually started once the 24-hour urine calcium reaches 250 mg.6 Thiazides are thought to enhance both proximal and distal renal tubular calcium reabsorption.43,44
PRIMARY HYPOPARATHYROIDISM: LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT
Long-term management of primary hypoparathyroidism requires calcium and vitamin D supplementation.
Calcium supplements. The most commonly prescribed calcium preparations are calcium carbonate and calcium citrate (containing 40% and 20% elemental calcium, respectively). Calcium carbonate, which is less expensive than calcium citrate, binds with phosphate intake and requires an acidic environment for absorption, and so it is better absorbed when taken with meals. Because calcium citrate does not require an acidic environment for absorption, it is the calcium preparation of choice for patients on proton pump inhibitors, or patients with achlorhydria or constipation.45 Calcium doses vary widely, with most hypoparathyroid patients requiring 1 to 2 g of elemental calcium daily.6
Vitamin D supplements. To promote intestinal absorption, calcium is combined with vitamin D in a fixed-dose preparation given in divided doses.46 Calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) is the most active metabolite of vitamin D, with rapid onset and offset of action, and it is the preferred form of vitamin D therapy for patients with hypoparathyroidism. If calcitriol is not available or is not affordable, alphacalcidol (1-alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3) is another option. This is a synthetic analogue of vitamin D that is already hyroxylated at the C1 position. After oral intake, it is hydroxylated in the liver to form calcitriol.
Since renal production of calcitriol is PTH-dependent, in hypoparathyroidism the conversion of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to calcitriol is limited. Therefore, vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) and vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) are not the preferred forms of vitamin D for such patients. However, either can be added to calcitriol, as they may have extraskeletal benefits.7
CASE CONCLUDED
Our patient presented with primary parathyroid insufficiency associated with vitamin D deficiency. Therefore, in addition to calcitriol and calcium combined with vitamin D in a fixed-dose preparation, her management included vitamin D3 for her vitamin D deficiency.
She was discharged on these medications. At a follow-up visit 3 weeks later, her measured serum calcium level was 8.6 mg/dL. She reported gradual resolution of her symptoms. She was also referred to a psychiatrist for her depression.
TAKE-HOME POINTS
- Hypocalcemia causes neuromuscular excitability, manifested clinically by tetany.
- Common causes of hypocalcemia include vitamin D deficiency, hypomagnesemia, renal failure, and primary hypoparathyroidism.
- The first step in evaluating hypocalcemia is to correct the measured serum calcium to the serum albumin concentration.
- Laboratory testing for hypocalcemia should include serum phosphorus, magnesium, creatinine, PTH, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3.
- Primary hypoparathyroidism is characterized by hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and low serum PTH.
- Moderate to severe manifestations of hypo-
calcemia and acute hypocalcemia (< 7.6 mg/dL), even if asymptomatic, warrant intravenous calcium therapy. - Correction of hypomagnesemia is essential to treat hypocalcemia, especially if resistant to intravenous calcium therapy.
- The goal of chronic management of primary hypoparathyroidism includes correcting the serum calcium level to a low-normal range, the serum phosphorus level to an upper-normal range, and prevention of hypercalciuria.
Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Mr. Michael Edward Tierney of the School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia, for his linguistic editing of the manuscript.
- Jesus JE, Landry A. Images in clinical medicine. Chvostek’s and Trousseau’s signs. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:e15.
- Urbano FL. Signs of hypocalcemia: Chvostek’s and Trousseau’s. Hosp Physician 2000; 36:43–45.
- Chisthi MM, Nair RS, Kuttanchettiyar KG, Yadev I. Mechanisms behind post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia: interplay of calcitonin, parathormone, and albumin—a prospective study. J Invest Surg 2017; 30:217–225.
- Shoback DM, Bilezikian JP, Costa AG, et al. Presentation of hypoparathyroidism: etiologies and clinical features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2300–2312.
- Stack BC Jr, Bimston DN, Bodenner DL, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology disease state clinical review: postoperative hypoparathyroidism—definitions and management. Endocr Pract 2015; 21:674–685.
- Shoback D. Clinical practice. Hypoparathyroidism. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:391–403.
- Abate EG, Clarke BL. Review of hypoparathyroidism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017; 7:172.
- Coimbra C, Monteiro F, Oliveira P, Ribeiro L, de Almeida MG, Condé A. Hypoparathyroidism following thyroidectomy: predictive factors. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2017; 68:106–111.
- Thomusch O, Machens A, Sekulla C, Ukkat J, Brauckhoff M, Dralle H. The impact of surgical technique on postoperative hypoparathyroidism in bilateral thyroid surgery: a multivariate analysis of 5846 consecutive patients. Surgery 2003; 133:180–185.
- Hirsch PF, Lester GE, Talmage RV. Calcitonin, an enigmatic hormone: does it have a function? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2001; 1:299–305.
- Karne SS, Bhalerao NS. Carpal tunnel syndrome in hypothyroidism. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10:OC36–OC38.
- Duyff RF, Van den Bosch J, Laman DM, van Loon BJ, Linssen WH. Neuromuscular findings in thyroid dysfunction: a prospective clinical and electrodiagnostic study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68:750–755.
- Palumbo CF, Szabo RM, Olmsted SL. The effects of hypothyroidism and thyroid replacement on the development of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25:734–739.
- Katz JN, Stirrat CR, Larson MG, Fossel AH, Eaton HM, Liang MH. A self-administered hand symptom diagram for the diagnosis and epidemiologic study of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:1495–1498.
- Katz JN, Stirrat CR. A self-administered hand diagram for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1990; 15:360–363.
- Calfee RP, Dale AM, Ryan D, Descatha A, Franzblau A, Evanoff B. Performance of simplified scoring systems for hand diagrams in carpal tunnel syndrome screening. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37:10–17.
- D’Arcy CA, McGee S. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000; 283:3110–3117.
- Marchettini P, Lacerenza M, Mauri E, Marangoni C. Painful peripheral neuropathies. Curr Neuropharmacol 2006; 4:175–181.
- Kibirige D, Mwebaze R. Vitamin B12 deficiency among patients with diabetes mellitus: is routine screening and supplementation justified? J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013;12:17.
- Akinlade KS, Agbebaku SO, Rahamon SK, Balogun WO. Vitamin B12 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2015; 13:79–83.
- Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1993; 22:363–375.
- Macefield G, Burke D. Paraesthesiae and tetany induced by voluntary hyperventilation. Increased excitability of human cutaneous and motor axons. Brain 1991; 114:527–540.
- Benoit SR, Mendelsohn AB, Nourjah P, Staffa JA, Graham DJ. Risk factors for prolonged QTc among US adults: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005; 12:363–368.
- Khoo TK, Vege SS, Abu-Lebdeh HS, Ryu E, Nadeem S, Wermers RA. Acute pancreatitis in primary hyperparathyroidism: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:2115–2118.
- McKay C, Beastall GH, Imrie CW, Baxter JN. Circulating intact parathyroid hormone levels in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1994; 81:357–360.
- Talmage RV, Mobley HT. Calcium homeostasis: reassessment of the actions of parathyroid hormone. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2008; 156:1–8.
- Friedman PA, Gesek FA. Calcium transport in renal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1993; 264:F181–F198.
- Jensen PV, Jelstrup SM, Homøe P. Long-term outcomes after total thyroidectomy. Dan Med J 2015; 62:A5156.
- Ritter K, Elfenbein D, Schneider DF, Chen H, Sippel RS. Hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy: incidence and resolution. J Surg Res 2015; 197:348–353.
- Promberger R, Ott J, Kober F, Karik M, Freissmuth M, Hermann M. Normal parathyroid hormone levels do not exclude permanent hypoparathyroidism after thyroidectomy. Thyroid 2011; 21:145–150.
- Lorente-Poch L, Sancho JJ, Muñoz-Nova JL, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Sitges-Serra A. Defining the syndromes of parathyroid failure after total thyroidectomy. Gland Surgery 2015; 4:82–90.
- Cooper MS, Gittoes NJ. Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia. BMJ 2008; 336:1298–1302.
- Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Diagnosis and treatment of hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinologist 1996; 6:10–18.
- Carroll R, Matfin G. Endocrine and metabolic emergencies: hypocalcaemia. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2010; 1:29–33.
- Kim MP, Raho VJ, Mak J, Kaynar AM. Skin and soft tissue necrosis from calcium chloride in a deicer. J Emerg Med 2007; 32:41–44.
- Tong GM, Rude RK. Magnesium deficiency in critical illness. J Intensive Care Med 2005; 20:3–17.
- Cholst IN, Steinberg SF, Tropper PJ, Fox HE, Segre GV, Bilezikian JP. The influence of hypermagnesemia on serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels in human subjects. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:1221–1225.
- Ryzen E, Nelson TA, Rude RK. Low blood mononuclear cell magnesium content and hypocalcemia in normomagnesemic patients. West J Med 1987; 147:549–553.
- Koontz SL, Friedman SA, Schwartz ML. Symptomatic hypocalcemia after tocolytic therapy with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1773–1776.
- Brandi ML, Bilezikian JP, Shoback D, et al. Management of hypoparathyroidism: summary statement and guidelines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2273–2283.
- Porter RH, Cox BG, Heaney D, Hostetter TH, Stinebaugh BJ, Suki WN. Treatment of hypoparathyroid patients with chlorthalidone. N Engl J Med 1978; 298:577–581.
- Clarke BL, Brown EM, Collins MT, et al. Epidemiology and diagnosis of hypoparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2284–2299.
- Nijenhuis T, Vallon V, van der Kemp AW, Loffing J, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Enhanced passive Ca2+ reabsorption and reduced Mg2+ channel abundance explains thiazide-induced hypocalciuria and hypomagnesemia. J Clin Invest 2005; 115:1651–1658.
- Costanzo LS. Localization of diuretic action in microperfused rat distal tubules: Ca and Na transport. Am J Physiol 1985; 248:F527–F535.
- Brandi ML, Bilezikian JP, Shoback D, et al. Management of hypoparathyroidism: summary statement and guidelines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2273–2283.
- Scotti A, Bianchini C, Abbiati G, Marzo A. Absorption of calcium administered alone or in fixed combination with vitamin D to healthy volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung 2001; 51:493–500.
- Jesus JE, Landry A. Images in clinical medicine. Chvostek’s and Trousseau’s signs. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:e15.
- Urbano FL. Signs of hypocalcemia: Chvostek’s and Trousseau’s. Hosp Physician 2000; 36:43–45.
- Chisthi MM, Nair RS, Kuttanchettiyar KG, Yadev I. Mechanisms behind post-thyroidectomy hypocalcemia: interplay of calcitonin, parathormone, and albumin—a prospective study. J Invest Surg 2017; 30:217–225.
- Shoback DM, Bilezikian JP, Costa AG, et al. Presentation of hypoparathyroidism: etiologies and clinical features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2300–2312.
- Stack BC Jr, Bimston DN, Bodenner DL, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology disease state clinical review: postoperative hypoparathyroidism—definitions and management. Endocr Pract 2015; 21:674–685.
- Shoback D. Clinical practice. Hypoparathyroidism. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:391–403.
- Abate EG, Clarke BL. Review of hypoparathyroidism. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017; 7:172.
- Coimbra C, Monteiro F, Oliveira P, Ribeiro L, de Almeida MG, Condé A. Hypoparathyroidism following thyroidectomy: predictive factors. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2017; 68:106–111.
- Thomusch O, Machens A, Sekulla C, Ukkat J, Brauckhoff M, Dralle H. The impact of surgical technique on postoperative hypoparathyroidism in bilateral thyroid surgery: a multivariate analysis of 5846 consecutive patients. Surgery 2003; 133:180–185.
- Hirsch PF, Lester GE, Talmage RV. Calcitonin, an enigmatic hormone: does it have a function? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2001; 1:299–305.
- Karne SS, Bhalerao NS. Carpal tunnel syndrome in hypothyroidism. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10:OC36–OC38.
- Duyff RF, Van den Bosch J, Laman DM, van Loon BJ, Linssen WH. Neuromuscular findings in thyroid dysfunction: a prospective clinical and electrodiagnostic study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 68:750–755.
- Palumbo CF, Szabo RM, Olmsted SL. The effects of hypothyroidism and thyroid replacement on the development of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25:734–739.
- Katz JN, Stirrat CR, Larson MG, Fossel AH, Eaton HM, Liang MH. A self-administered hand symptom diagram for the diagnosis and epidemiologic study of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Rheumatol 1990; 17:1495–1498.
- Katz JN, Stirrat CR. A self-administered hand diagram for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1990; 15:360–363.
- Calfee RP, Dale AM, Ryan D, Descatha A, Franzblau A, Evanoff B. Performance of simplified scoring systems for hand diagrams in carpal tunnel syndrome screening. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37:10–17.
- D’Arcy CA, McGee S. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have carpal tunnel syndrome? JAMA 2000; 283:3110–3117.
- Marchettini P, Lacerenza M, Mauri E, Marangoni C. Painful peripheral neuropathies. Curr Neuropharmacol 2006; 4:175–181.
- Kibirige D, Mwebaze R. Vitamin B12 deficiency among patients with diabetes mellitus: is routine screening and supplementation justified? J Diabetes Metab Disord 2013;12:17.
- Akinlade KS, Agbebaku SO, Rahamon SK, Balogun WO. Vitamin B12 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2015; 13:79–83.
- Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1993; 22:363–375.
- Macefield G, Burke D. Paraesthesiae and tetany induced by voluntary hyperventilation. Increased excitability of human cutaneous and motor axons. Brain 1991; 114:527–540.
- Benoit SR, Mendelsohn AB, Nourjah P, Staffa JA, Graham DJ. Risk factors for prolonged QTc among US adults: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005; 12:363–368.
- Khoo TK, Vege SS, Abu-Lebdeh HS, Ryu E, Nadeem S, Wermers RA. Acute pancreatitis in primary hyperparathyroidism: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:2115–2118.
- McKay C, Beastall GH, Imrie CW, Baxter JN. Circulating intact parathyroid hormone levels in acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1994; 81:357–360.
- Talmage RV, Mobley HT. Calcium homeostasis: reassessment of the actions of parathyroid hormone. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2008; 156:1–8.
- Friedman PA, Gesek FA. Calcium transport in renal epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1993; 264:F181–F198.
- Jensen PV, Jelstrup SM, Homøe P. Long-term outcomes after total thyroidectomy. Dan Med J 2015; 62:A5156.
- Ritter K, Elfenbein D, Schneider DF, Chen H, Sippel RS. Hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy: incidence and resolution. J Surg Res 2015; 197:348–353.
- Promberger R, Ott J, Kober F, Karik M, Freissmuth M, Hermann M. Normal parathyroid hormone levels do not exclude permanent hypoparathyroidism after thyroidectomy. Thyroid 2011; 21:145–150.
- Lorente-Poch L, Sancho JJ, Muñoz-Nova JL, Sánchez-Velázquez P, Sitges-Serra A. Defining the syndromes of parathyroid failure after total thyroidectomy. Gland Surgery 2015; 4:82–90.
- Cooper MS, Gittoes NJ. Diagnosis and management of hypocalcaemia. BMJ 2008; 336:1298–1302.
- Tohme JF, Bilezikian JP. Diagnosis and treatment of hypocalcemic emergencies. Endocrinologist 1996; 6:10–18.
- Carroll R, Matfin G. Endocrine and metabolic emergencies: hypocalcaemia. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab 2010; 1:29–33.
- Kim MP, Raho VJ, Mak J, Kaynar AM. Skin and soft tissue necrosis from calcium chloride in a deicer. J Emerg Med 2007; 32:41–44.
- Tong GM, Rude RK. Magnesium deficiency in critical illness. J Intensive Care Med 2005; 20:3–17.
- Cholst IN, Steinberg SF, Tropper PJ, Fox HE, Segre GV, Bilezikian JP. The influence of hypermagnesemia on serum calcium and parathyroid hormone levels in human subjects. N Engl J Med 1984; 310:1221–1225.
- Ryzen E, Nelson TA, Rude RK. Low blood mononuclear cell magnesium content and hypocalcemia in normomagnesemic patients. West J Med 1987; 147:549–553.
- Koontz SL, Friedman SA, Schwartz ML. Symptomatic hypocalcemia after tocolytic therapy with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:1773–1776.
- Brandi ML, Bilezikian JP, Shoback D, et al. Management of hypoparathyroidism: summary statement and guidelines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2273–2283.
- Porter RH, Cox BG, Heaney D, Hostetter TH, Stinebaugh BJ, Suki WN. Treatment of hypoparathyroid patients with chlorthalidone. N Engl J Med 1978; 298:577–581.
- Clarke BL, Brown EM, Collins MT, et al. Epidemiology and diagnosis of hypoparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2284–2299.
- Nijenhuis T, Vallon V, van der Kemp AW, Loffing J, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Enhanced passive Ca2+ reabsorption and reduced Mg2+ channel abundance explains thiazide-induced hypocalciuria and hypomagnesemia. J Clin Invest 2005; 115:1651–1658.
- Costanzo LS. Localization of diuretic action in microperfused rat distal tubules: Ca and Na transport. Am J Physiol 1985; 248:F527–F535.
- Brandi ML, Bilezikian JP, Shoback D, et al. Management of hypoparathyroidism: summary statement and guidelines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101:2273–2283.
- Scotti A, Bianchini C, Abbiati G, Marzo A. Absorption of calcium administered alone or in fixed combination with vitamin D to healthy volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung 2001; 51:493–500.
Ascites from intraperitoneal urine leakage after pelvic radiation
A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for the second time in 2 months with acute onset of severe abdominal pain. She had a history of cervical cancer treated with total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy at age 38.
LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON THE BLADDER
Urinary ascites from intraperitoneal urine leakage is a rare but clinically important sequel to bladder fistula or bladder wall rupture. Fistula or rupture can be caused by pelvic irradiation, blunt trauma, or surgical procedures, but may also be spontaneous.2
When the total radiation dose to the bladder exceeds 60 Gy, radiation cystitis may occur, leading to bladder fistula.3 Effects of radiation on the bladder are usually seen within 2 to 4 years3 but may occur long after the completion of radiation therapy—10 years2 or even 30 to 40 years later.4 Therefore, ascites of unknown origin in a patient with a history of pelvic radiation therapy should lead to an evaluation for late radiation cystitis and urinary ascites from bladder rupture.
- Ramcharan K, Poon-King TM, Indar R. Spontaneous intraperitoneal rupture of a neurogenic bladder; the importance of ascitic fluid urea and electrolytes in diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 1987; 63:999–1000.
- Matsumura M, Ando N, Kumabe A, Dhaliwal G. Pseudo-renal failure: bladder rupture with urinary ascites. BMJ Case Rep 2015; pii:bcr2015212671.
- Shi F, Wang T, Wang J, et al. Peritoneal bladder fistula following radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a case report. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:2008–2010.
- Hayashi W, Nishino T, Namie S, Obata Y, Furukawa M, Kohno S. Spontaneous bladder rupture diagnosis based on urinary appearance of mesothelial cells: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2014; 8:46.
A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for the second time in 2 months with acute onset of severe abdominal pain. She had a history of cervical cancer treated with total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy at age 38.
LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON THE BLADDER
Urinary ascites from intraperitoneal urine leakage is a rare but clinically important sequel to bladder fistula or bladder wall rupture. Fistula or rupture can be caused by pelvic irradiation, blunt trauma, or surgical procedures, but may also be spontaneous.2
When the total radiation dose to the bladder exceeds 60 Gy, radiation cystitis may occur, leading to bladder fistula.3 Effects of radiation on the bladder are usually seen within 2 to 4 years3 but may occur long after the completion of radiation therapy—10 years2 or even 30 to 40 years later.4 Therefore, ascites of unknown origin in a patient with a history of pelvic radiation therapy should lead to an evaluation for late radiation cystitis and urinary ascites from bladder rupture.
A 44-year-old woman was admitted to the hospital for the second time in 2 months with acute onset of severe abdominal pain. She had a history of cervical cancer treated with total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy at age 38.
LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON THE BLADDER
Urinary ascites from intraperitoneal urine leakage is a rare but clinically important sequel to bladder fistula or bladder wall rupture. Fistula or rupture can be caused by pelvic irradiation, blunt trauma, or surgical procedures, but may also be spontaneous.2
When the total radiation dose to the bladder exceeds 60 Gy, radiation cystitis may occur, leading to bladder fistula.3 Effects of radiation on the bladder are usually seen within 2 to 4 years3 but may occur long after the completion of radiation therapy—10 years2 or even 30 to 40 years later.4 Therefore, ascites of unknown origin in a patient with a history of pelvic radiation therapy should lead to an evaluation for late radiation cystitis and urinary ascites from bladder rupture.
- Ramcharan K, Poon-King TM, Indar R. Spontaneous intraperitoneal rupture of a neurogenic bladder; the importance of ascitic fluid urea and electrolytes in diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 1987; 63:999–1000.
- Matsumura M, Ando N, Kumabe A, Dhaliwal G. Pseudo-renal failure: bladder rupture with urinary ascites. BMJ Case Rep 2015; pii:bcr2015212671.
- Shi F, Wang T, Wang J, et al. Peritoneal bladder fistula following radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a case report. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:2008–2010.
- Hayashi W, Nishino T, Namie S, Obata Y, Furukawa M, Kohno S. Spontaneous bladder rupture diagnosis based on urinary appearance of mesothelial cells: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2014; 8:46.
- Ramcharan K, Poon-King TM, Indar R. Spontaneous intraperitoneal rupture of a neurogenic bladder; the importance of ascitic fluid urea and electrolytes in diagnosis. Postgrad Med J 1987; 63:999–1000.
- Matsumura M, Ando N, Kumabe A, Dhaliwal G. Pseudo-renal failure: bladder rupture with urinary ascites. BMJ Case Rep 2015; pii:bcr2015212671.
- Shi F, Wang T, Wang J, et al. Peritoneal bladder fistula following radiotherapy for cervical cancer: a case report. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:2008–2010.
- Hayashi W, Nishino T, Namie S, Obata Y, Furukawa M, Kohno S. Spontaneous bladder rupture diagnosis based on urinary appearance of mesothelial cells: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2014; 8:46.
Methemoglobinemia in an HIV patient
A 45-year-old man with known human immunodeficiency virus infection presented with a 5-day history of dyspnea. When his dyspnea had become symptomatic, he had restarted his home dapsone prophylaxis, but his dyspnea had progressively worsened, and his urine became dark.
Based on these test results, the patient’s dapsone was stopped and replaced with atovaquone. Intravenous infusion of methylene blue was started, with subsequent improvement of the hypoxia and cyanosis (Figure 1). His urine became green, but it returned to a normal color in a matter of hours. He was ultimately diagnosed with P jirovecii pneumonia and completed a course of atovaquone with total resolution of his symptoms.
THE MECHANISMS BEHIND METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
Heme iron is normally in the ferrous state (Fe2+), which allows for hemoglobin to carry oxygen and release it to tissues.1 Exposure to an oxidative stress can lead to methemoglobinemia from an increase in abnormal hemoglobin that contains iron in a ferric state (Fe3+).1,2
Methemoglobin reduces oxygen-carrying capacity in two ways: it is unable to carry oxygen, and its presence shifts the oxygen dissociation curve to the left, causing any remaining normal hemoglobin to be unable to release oxygen to the tissues.1,2
Causes of acquired methemoglobinemia include topical anesthetics (eg, benzocaine, lidocaine) and antibiotics (eg, dapsone).2,3 Signs and symptoms include cyanosis, headache, fatigue, dyspnea, lethargy, respiratory distress, and dark-colored urine.1,2
MANAGEMENT
Treatment consists of intravenous methylene blue, which reduces the hemoglobin from a ferric state to a ferrous state.1–4 Methylene blue is a water-soluble dye excreted primarily in the urine, and common side effects include dizziness, nausea, and green urine.5–7 The blue pigments from methylene blue combine with urobilin (a yellow pigment in the urine), producing a green color.7 This is not pathological and requires no treatment, as the urine returns to normal color after the body fully excretes the dye.5–7
If intravenous methylene blue fails to produce a response, other treatments to consider include hemodialysis, blood transfusion, exchange transfusion, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.2
- Umbreit J. Methemoglobin—it’s not just blue: a concise review. Am J Hematol 2007; 82:134–144.
- Ash-Bernal R, Wise R, Wright SM. Acquired methemoglobinemia: a retrospective series of 138 cases at 2 teaching hospitals. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004; 83:265–273.
- Coleman MD, Coleman NA. Drug-induced methaemoglobinaemia. Treatment issues. Drug Saf 1996; 14:394–405.
- Sikka P, Bindra VK, Kapoor S, Jain V, Saxena KK. Blue cures blue but be cautious. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2011; 3:543–545.
- Stratta P, Barbe MC. Images in clinical medicine. Green urine. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:e12.
- Miri-Aliabad G. Green urine secondary to methylene blue. Indian J Pediatr 2014; 81:1255–1256.
- Prakash S, Saini S, Mullick P, Pawar M. Green urine: a cause for concern? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017; 33:128–130.
A 45-year-old man with known human immunodeficiency virus infection presented with a 5-day history of dyspnea. When his dyspnea had become symptomatic, he had restarted his home dapsone prophylaxis, but his dyspnea had progressively worsened, and his urine became dark.
Based on these test results, the patient’s dapsone was stopped and replaced with atovaquone. Intravenous infusion of methylene blue was started, with subsequent improvement of the hypoxia and cyanosis (Figure 1). His urine became green, but it returned to a normal color in a matter of hours. He was ultimately diagnosed with P jirovecii pneumonia and completed a course of atovaquone with total resolution of his symptoms.
THE MECHANISMS BEHIND METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
Heme iron is normally in the ferrous state (Fe2+), which allows for hemoglobin to carry oxygen and release it to tissues.1 Exposure to an oxidative stress can lead to methemoglobinemia from an increase in abnormal hemoglobin that contains iron in a ferric state (Fe3+).1,2
Methemoglobin reduces oxygen-carrying capacity in two ways: it is unable to carry oxygen, and its presence shifts the oxygen dissociation curve to the left, causing any remaining normal hemoglobin to be unable to release oxygen to the tissues.1,2
Causes of acquired methemoglobinemia include topical anesthetics (eg, benzocaine, lidocaine) and antibiotics (eg, dapsone).2,3 Signs and symptoms include cyanosis, headache, fatigue, dyspnea, lethargy, respiratory distress, and dark-colored urine.1,2
MANAGEMENT
Treatment consists of intravenous methylene blue, which reduces the hemoglobin from a ferric state to a ferrous state.1–4 Methylene blue is a water-soluble dye excreted primarily in the urine, and common side effects include dizziness, nausea, and green urine.5–7 The blue pigments from methylene blue combine with urobilin (a yellow pigment in the urine), producing a green color.7 This is not pathological and requires no treatment, as the urine returns to normal color after the body fully excretes the dye.5–7
If intravenous methylene blue fails to produce a response, other treatments to consider include hemodialysis, blood transfusion, exchange transfusion, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.2
A 45-year-old man with known human immunodeficiency virus infection presented with a 5-day history of dyspnea. When his dyspnea had become symptomatic, he had restarted his home dapsone prophylaxis, but his dyspnea had progressively worsened, and his urine became dark.
Based on these test results, the patient’s dapsone was stopped and replaced with atovaquone. Intravenous infusion of methylene blue was started, with subsequent improvement of the hypoxia and cyanosis (Figure 1). His urine became green, but it returned to a normal color in a matter of hours. He was ultimately diagnosed with P jirovecii pneumonia and completed a course of atovaquone with total resolution of his symptoms.
THE MECHANISMS BEHIND METHEMOGLOBINEMIA
Heme iron is normally in the ferrous state (Fe2+), which allows for hemoglobin to carry oxygen and release it to tissues.1 Exposure to an oxidative stress can lead to methemoglobinemia from an increase in abnormal hemoglobin that contains iron in a ferric state (Fe3+).1,2
Methemoglobin reduces oxygen-carrying capacity in two ways: it is unable to carry oxygen, and its presence shifts the oxygen dissociation curve to the left, causing any remaining normal hemoglobin to be unable to release oxygen to the tissues.1,2
Causes of acquired methemoglobinemia include topical anesthetics (eg, benzocaine, lidocaine) and antibiotics (eg, dapsone).2,3 Signs and symptoms include cyanosis, headache, fatigue, dyspnea, lethargy, respiratory distress, and dark-colored urine.1,2
MANAGEMENT
Treatment consists of intravenous methylene blue, which reduces the hemoglobin from a ferric state to a ferrous state.1–4 Methylene blue is a water-soluble dye excreted primarily in the urine, and common side effects include dizziness, nausea, and green urine.5–7 The blue pigments from methylene blue combine with urobilin (a yellow pigment in the urine), producing a green color.7 This is not pathological and requires no treatment, as the urine returns to normal color after the body fully excretes the dye.5–7
If intravenous methylene blue fails to produce a response, other treatments to consider include hemodialysis, blood transfusion, exchange transfusion, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.2
- Umbreit J. Methemoglobin—it’s not just blue: a concise review. Am J Hematol 2007; 82:134–144.
- Ash-Bernal R, Wise R, Wright SM. Acquired methemoglobinemia: a retrospective series of 138 cases at 2 teaching hospitals. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004; 83:265–273.
- Coleman MD, Coleman NA. Drug-induced methaemoglobinaemia. Treatment issues. Drug Saf 1996; 14:394–405.
- Sikka P, Bindra VK, Kapoor S, Jain V, Saxena KK. Blue cures blue but be cautious. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2011; 3:543–545.
- Stratta P, Barbe MC. Images in clinical medicine. Green urine. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:e12.
- Miri-Aliabad G. Green urine secondary to methylene blue. Indian J Pediatr 2014; 81:1255–1256.
- Prakash S, Saini S, Mullick P, Pawar M. Green urine: a cause for concern? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017; 33:128–130.
- Umbreit J. Methemoglobin—it’s not just blue: a concise review. Am J Hematol 2007; 82:134–144.
- Ash-Bernal R, Wise R, Wright SM. Acquired methemoglobinemia: a retrospective series of 138 cases at 2 teaching hospitals. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004; 83:265–273.
- Coleman MD, Coleman NA. Drug-induced methaemoglobinaemia. Treatment issues. Drug Saf 1996; 14:394–405.
- Sikka P, Bindra VK, Kapoor S, Jain V, Saxena KK. Blue cures blue but be cautious. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2011; 3:543–545.
- Stratta P, Barbe MC. Images in clinical medicine. Green urine. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:e12.
- Miri-Aliabad G. Green urine secondary to methylene blue. Indian J Pediatr 2014; 81:1255–1256.
- Prakash S, Saini S, Mullick P, Pawar M. Green urine: a cause for concern? J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2017; 33:128–130.
Primary care management of chronic pelvic pain in women
Chronic pelvic pain is a common clinical problem in women, as prevalent in primary care as asthma or back pain.1,2 It is often associated with lost work days and decreased productivity, increased healthcare spending, mood disorders, and negative effects on personal relationships.1–3
While specialty care referral may eventually be indicated, primary care doctors can take steps to diagnose and effectively manage the condition.
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT LED BY PRIMARY CARE
Chronic pelvic pain is defined as pain in the lower abdomen persisting for 3 to 6 months and of sufficient severity to require medical care or cause a functional disability.3 It is often detrimental to a woman’s personal life and overall health, making a comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary approach to management especially important.
The ideal care-delivery model is the patient-centered medical home, whereby a primary care physician coordinates comprehensive care with the help of an interdisciplinary team.4,5 For complex cases, referral may be needed to other specialties (eg, obstetrics and gynecology, pain medicine) to help manage care.
TARGETED EVALUATION
Chronic pelvic pain often coexists with other systemic pain syndromes or psychiatric conditions common in primary care. Table 1 lists common causes and associated findings.
Detailed history is critical
The history is of utmost importance. Clinicians should query patients about the characteristics of the pain as well as their medical and surgical history. Particular attention should be given to obtaining a complete gynecologic history, including pregnancy, delivery complications, dyspareunia, sexual assault, and trauma. A detailed review of systems should focus on the reproductive, gastroenterologic, musculoskeletal, urologic, and neuropsychiatric systems.
As with many pain syndromes, allowing the patient to “tell her story” helps to establish rapport and obtain a more complete assessment. Chronic pelvic pain has been associated with physical or sexual abuse as a child or adult, so is essential to foster the doctor-patient relationship and create a safe and open space for disclosure.3,6 It is important to screen women for safety at home as well as for satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their relationships with their spouse or partner and family.
Physical examination
The physical examination should be directed by the history but should always include abdominal and pelvic examinations. These should be conducted slowly and gently, assessing for areas of tenderness, masses, and other abnormalities. Clinicians should aim to pinpoint the exact anatomic locations of tenderness if possible. Ongoing dialogue facilitates this process by inquiring about pain at each point of the examination.
The pelvic examination should begin with visual inspection for redness, discharge, lesions, fissures, excoriations, and other abnormalities. A moistened cotton swab may be used to evaluate the vulva and vestibule for localized tenderness. The manual portion of the pelvic examination should begin with a single digit, noting any introital tenderness or spasm. Next, the levator ani muscles should be directly palpated for tone and tenderness. The pelvic floor should be evaluated with attention to tenderness of the bladder or musculoskeletal structures (Figure 1). A bimanual examination assessing uterine size and tenderness, nodularity, or a fixed, immobile uterus should be conducted.
Diagnostic workup
Because the differential diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain is broad, the diagnostic workup and testing should be based on findings of the history and physical examination. In general, extensive laboratory testing is of limited use for evaluating women with chronic pelvic pain.3,7
Urinalysis should be obtained for symptoms suggesting bladder involvement such as interstitial cystitis.
Pelvic ultrasonography can help identify pelvic masses palpated during the physical examination, but routine use of imaging is not recommended.3,7 If pelvic congestion syndrome is suspected, starting with pelvic ultrasonography is reasonable before incurring the risk or cost of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.8
GENERAL TREATMENT
Medical therapy
The main goals of medical therapy are to improve function and quality of life while minimizing adverse effects. General treatments include the following:
Analgesics. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen may provide pain relief, although there is weak evidence for their efficacy in treating chronic pelvic pain.9
Neuropathic agents. One of several available neuropathic agents commonly used in the treatment of chronic pain can be tried on patients who fail to respond to analgesics. Tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline and imipramine decrease pain, reduce symptoms of depression, and improve sleep.10 The results of a small randomized controlled trial suggest that gabapentin is more effective than amitriptyline for reducing chronic pelvic pain.11,12 Published guidelines currently list both amitriptyline and gabapentin as first-line agents; nortriptyline and pregabalin are considered acceptable initial alternatives.9
Venlafaxine and duloxetine may help chronic pelvic pain, although specific evidence is lacking. Duloxetine may be an appropriate choice for women with chronic pelvic pain who also experience depression and urinary stress incontinence.9
Opioids. Opioid therapy should be considered only when all other reasonable therapies have failed.10 Patients may develop tolerance or dependence, as well as opioid-induced adverse effects such as hyperalgesia.9,10 Guidelines recommend that primary care providers consult with a pain management specialist before prescribing opioids, and that patients be thoroughly counseled about the risks and side effects.9
Nerve block and neuromodulation. There is weak evidence for the use of these modalities for treating chronic pelvic pain.9 If used, they should be part of a broader treatment plan and should be performed by providers who specialize in management of chronic pain.
DISEASE-SPECIFIC TREATMENT
Endometriosis: Hormonal therapy
Pelvic pain that significantly fluctuates with the menstrual cycle may be caused by endometriosis, the most common gynecologic cause of chronic pelvic pain. Women with cyclic chronic pelvic pain should be empirically treated with hormonal therapy for at least 3 to 6 months before diagnostic laparoscopy is performed.13
Oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, progestogens, and danazol have proven efficacy, although side-effect profiles differ significantly. In a comparative trial, patients treated with GnRH analogues had more improvement in pain scores compared with those treated with oral contraceptives, but they experienced a significant decrease in bone mineral density.11 The effects on bone mineral density associated with GnRH analogue therapy can be mitigated by “add-back” low-dose hormonal therapy (norethindrone, low-dose estrogen, or a combination of estrogen and progesterone), which may also provide symptomatic relief for associated hot flashes and vaginal symptoms.11
Interstitial cystitis often accompanies endometriosis
Recognizing that chronic pelvic pain may have more than one cause is important when developing a comprehensive care plan. Interstitial cystitis coexists with endometriosis in up to 60% of patients.14 Initial treatment is pentosan polysulfate sodium, an oral treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for interstitial cystitis that works by restoring the protective glycosaminoglycan layer in the bladder.14,15 Amitriptyline may also be used to treat interstitial cystitis-associated nocturia.
Myofascial pain: Neuromuscular blockers
According to a recent systematic review of therapies for chronic pelvic pain, patients with symptoms related to myofascial pain may benefit from neuromuscular blockade.12 One randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin A vs saline for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic floor spasm found that after 6 months of observation, women who received botulinum toxin had significantly lower pain scores than those who received saline.12
Pelvic congestion syndrome: Multiple options
Pelvic congestion syndrome may be treated with hormonal, radiologic, or surgical therapy.16 A randomized controlled trial involving patients with chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic congestion demonstrated that treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate or a GnRH agonist (goserelin) improved pelvic symptoms.17
A Cochrane review of nonsurgical interventions for chronic pelvic pain included women with a diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome or adhesions. It found that patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate were more likely to have 50% pain reduction lasting up to 9 months compared with patients taking placebo.12 In comparative studies, GnRH analogues were more effective in relieving pelvic pain than progestogen therapy.
Radiologic embolization therapy is as effective as hysterectomy for the relief of chronic pelvic pain related to pelvic congestion syndrome, and it can be performed in the outpatient setting.
Irritable bowel syndrome: Try dietary changes
Symptoms of chronic pelvic pain that are associated with changes in stool consistency and frequency suggest irritable bowel syndrome. Symptoms may improve with dietary changes and fiber supplementation. Antispasmodic agents are frequently used but their anticholinergic effects may worsen constipation.14
PELVIC PHYSICAL THERAPY
Pelvic physical therapy targets the musculoskeletal components of bowel, bladder, and sexual function to restore strength, flexibility, balance, and coordination to the pelvic floor and surrounding lumbopelvic muscles. Patients with dyspareunia, pain with activity, or a significant musculoskeletal abnormality (eg, vaginismus or point tenderness on examination) are particularly good candidates for this therapy. It is done by a physical therapist with special training in techniques to manipulate the pelvic floor to address pelvic pain.
Educating the patient
Informing the patient before the initial physical therapy visit is essential for success. Referring clinicians should emphasize to patients that treatment response can help to guide further physician intervention. Patients should be counseled that pelvic physical therapy includes a pelvic examination and an expectation to participate in a home program. Although noticeable improvement takes time, encouragement provided by the entire team, including medical providers, can help a patient maintain her care plan.
Therapists typically see a patient once a week for 8 to 12 visits initially. Insurance usually covers pelvic physical therapy through the same policy as routine physical therapy.
During the initial evaluation, the patient receives an external and internal pelvic examination assessing muscle length, strength, and coordination of the back, hip, and internal pelvic floor. Internal evaluation can be done vaginally or rectally, with one gloved finger, without the need for speculum or stirrups. Biofeedback and surface electromyography (using either perianal or internal electrode placement) are used to evaluate muscle activity and to assist the patient in developing appropriate motor control during strengthening or relaxation.18
Up-training (or strengthening) aims to improve pelvic floor endurance. It can improve pelvic instability and symptoms of heaviness and discomfort from prolapse. Patients learn to appropriately utilize the pelvic floor in isolation. If a patient is too weak to contract on her own, neuromuscular electrical stimulation is used with an internal electrode to provide an assisted contraction.
Down-training (or relaxation) focuses on reducing tone in overactive pelvic muscles. It can improve symptoms of chronic pelvic pain, sexual pain, vulvodynia, and pudendal neuralgias. Patients are made aware of chronic holding patterns that lead to excess tone in the pelvic floor and learn how to release them through stretching, cardiovascular activity, meditation, and manual release of the involved muscle groups internally and externally. Internal musculature can be manipulated by a therapist in clinic or by the patient’s trained partner; the patient can also reach necessary areas with a vaginal dilator.
Functional coordination of the pelvic floor is needed for comfortable vaginal penetration and defecation. Training with biofeedback improves a patient’s ability to relax and open the pelvic floor.18 Vaginal dilators with surface electromyography are used to treat vaginismus to eliminate reflexive pelvic floor spasm during penetration. Perineal and vaginal compliance can be improved through manual release techniques with hands or vaginal dilators to restore normal mobility of tissues. This can reduce pain from postsurgical changes, postpartum sequelae, atrophic vaginal changes, shortened muscles from chronic holding, and adhesions.
PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS
Pelvic pain is not only a biomedical difficulty; psychosocial factors can contribute to and be affected by pelvic pain. Patients with pelvic pain often experience lower quality of life, higher rates of anxiety and depression, and increased stress compared with others.19,20 People with pain also have more relationship stress, and patients’ partners often experience emotional distress, isolation, and feelings of powerlessness in the relationship.21
Psychosocial interventions, provided along with biomedical treatment, can help to reduce pain, anxiety, and depression and improve relational well-being.22,23 In addition to attending to pain-related symptoms, comprehensive care involves recognizing and treating coexisting anxiety, depression, stress, and relationship conflict. Interventions for these difficulties are many, and a comprehensive list of interventions is beyond the focus of this section.19
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy is based on the idea that maladaptive cognitions can lead to problematic behaviors and emotional distress.24 Interventions are carried out by a provider with specialized training in its use (eg, therapist, pain psychologist, psychiatrist).
Meta-analyses of studies that investigated the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain found consistent small to medium improvement in pain-related symptoms.24 Studies that used cognitive behavioral therapy for pelvic pain found reduced overall pain severity and pain during intercourse, increased sexual satisfaction, enhanced sexual function, and less-exaggerated responses to pain.25–27
Although cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based interventions produce positive outcomes, research on these interventions typically includes treatment carried out over a span of weeks. Common barriers to such care include lack of patient motivation, financial limitations, transportation problems, and time constraints.
The following psychosocial interventions have been chosen because they can be delivered in a short amount of time and integrated into a patient’s medical care by a medical or behavioral health provider. Because of the brevity and simplicity of these interventions, more patients with pelvic pain can receive psychosocial care as part of their usual medical encounters.
Behavioral activation
People experiencing depressive symptoms tend to isolate themselves and stop participating in activities they enjoy, including spending time with family and friends. Behavioral activation interventions that address such isolating behaviors have been shown to be effective in improving depressive symptoms.28–30
A simple, brief intervention can be administered during routine medical care,28 involving the following steps:
- Determine activities that the patient might implement that would decrease depressive symptoms. Questions such as, “When do you feel less depressed?” or “What brings you some happiness in your life?” can generate possible activities.
- Ask the patient to identify people in her life who have been supportive and with whom she could engage.
- Create with the patient a list of possible activities and social interactions that may enhance well-being.
- Make a schedule for participating in activities, possibly with rewards for completing them. Patients should be encouraged to follow the prescribed schedule of activities rather than make decisions based on mood or other factors.
Relaxation strategies
Relaxation can help patients reduce stress and anxiety, and can also help reduce pain.31–33
Diaphragmatic or “belly breathing” is a deep-breathing technique in which participants are asked to take in air through the nose and fully fill the lungs and lower belly. This technique allows the body to take in more oxygen, helping to lower blood pressure and slow the heartbeat. In addition to physiologic benefits, concentrating on deep breathing can help slow down or stop intrusive thoughts and distressing physical sensations.34
Progressive muscle relaxation involves the systematic tensing and relaxing of each large muscle group in the body.35 The goal is to eliminate physical and emotional stress through focusing on the sensations of tension and relaxation.
Scripts and audio and video resources for belly breathing and progressive muscle relaxation can be found on the Internet. The techniques can be taught during the medical appointment or offered as resources for home practice.
Couple-based care
Targeting couples is more effective for improving well-being than focusing solely on a patient’s psychosocial difficulties, so each of the above interventions may be more effective if tailored to include the patient’s partner.36 If the partner is with the patient during medical visits or is included in long-term psychosocial treatment, he or she can be directly involved in learning and practicing interventions with the patient. If the partner is not present, the patient can be asked to practice newly learned well-being-enhancing strategies with her partner outside the appointment time. Couples therapy can improve psychosocial well-being for both partners.
Setting goals
- Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behavior. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51:541–547.
- Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Lipschutz RC, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 81:321–327.
- Howard FM. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:594–611.
- AHRQ PCMH Resource Center. Transforming the organization and delivery of primary care. www.pcmh.ahrq.gov/. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Pryzbylkowski P, Ashburn MA. The pain medical home: a patient-centered medical home model of care for patients with chronic pain. Anesthesiol Clin 2015; 33:785–793.
- Jamieson DJ, Steege JF. The association of sexual abuse with pelvic pain complaints in a primary care population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:1408–1412.
- Gambone JC, Mittman BS, Munro MG, Scialli AR, Winkel CA; Chronic Pelvic Pain/Endometriosis Working Group. Consensus statement for the management of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: proceedings of an expert-panel consensus process. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:961–972.
- Ganeshan A, Upponi S, Hon LQ, Uthappa MC, Warakaulle DR, Uberoi R. Chronic pelvic pain due to pelvic congestion syndrome: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30:1105–1111.
- Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Elneil S, et al; European Association of Urology. Guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Chronic-Pelvic-Pain-2015.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2018.
- Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Abbiati A, Barbara G, Fedele L. Medical, surgical and alternative treatments for chronic pelvic pain in women: a descriptive review. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009; 25:208–221.
- Rafique S, DeCherney AH. Medical management of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60:485–496.
- Cheong YC, Smotra G, Williams AC. Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 3:CD008797.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The initial management of chronic pelvic pain, Green-top guideline No.41. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_41.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Shin JH, Howard FM. Management of chronic pelvic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011; 15:377–385.
- Nelson P, Apte G, Justiz R, Brismee JM, Dedrick G, Sizer PS. Chronic female pelvic pain—Part 2: differential diagnosis and management. Pain Pract 2012; 12:111–141.
- Holloran-Schwartz MB. Surgical evaluation and treatment of the patient with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41:357–369.
- Soysal ME, Soysal S, Vicdan K, Ozer S. A randomized controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:931–939.
- Arnouk A, De E, Rehfuss A, Cappadocia C, Dickson S, Lian F. Physical, complementary, and alternative medicine in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders. Curr Urol Rep 2017; 18:47.
- Faccin F, Barbara G, Saita E, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and mental health: pelvic pain makes the difference. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 36:135–141.
- Naliboff BD, Stephens AJ, Afari N, et al; MAPP Research Network. Widespread psychosocial difficulties in men and women with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndromes: case-control findings from the multidisciplinary approach to the study of chronic pelvic pain research network. Urology 2015; 85:1319–1327.
- West C, Usher K, Foster K, Stewart L. Chronic pain and the family: the experience of the partners of people living with chronic pain. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21:3352–3360.
- Khatri P, Mays K. Brief interventions in primary care. www.integration.samhsa.gov/Brief_Intervention_in_PC,_pdf.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Roy-Byrne P, Veitengruber JP, Bystritsky A, et al. Brief intervention for anxiety in primary care patients. J Am Board Fam Med 2009; 22:175–186.
- Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res 2012; 36:427–440.
- Masheb RM, Kerns RD, Lozano C, Minkin MJ, Richman S. A randomized clinical trial for women with vulvodynia: cognitive-behavioral therapy vs. supportive psychotherapy. Pain 2009; 141:31–40.
- ter Kuile MM, Weijenborg PT. A cognitive-behavioral group program for women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome (VVS): factors associated with treatment success. J Sex Marital Ther 2006; 32:199–213.
- Bergeron S, Khalifé S, Glazer HI, Binik YM. Surgical and behavioral treatments for vestibulodynia: two-and-one-half year follow-up and predictors of outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:159–166.
- Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L. Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2007; 27:318–326.
- Mazzucchelli T, Kane R, Rees C. Behavioral activation treatments for depression in adults: a meta-analysis and review. Clin Psychol Sci Practice 2009; 16:383–411.
- Riebe G, Fan MY, Unützer J, Vannoy S. Activity scheduling as a core component of effective care management for late-life depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27:1298–1304.
- Chen YF, Huang XY, Chien CH, Cheng JF. The effectiveness of diaphragmatic breathing relaxation training for reducing anxiety. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2017; 53:329–336.
- Klainin-Yobas P, Oo WN, Yew PYS, Lau Y. Effects of relaxation interventions on depression and anxiety among older adults: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health 2015; 19:1043–1055.
- Finlay KA, Rogers J. Maximizing self-care through familiarity: the role of practice effects in enhancing music listening and progressive muscle relaxation for pain management. Psychology of Music 2015; 43:511–529.
- Harvard Health Publications; Harvard Medical School. Relaxation techniques: breath control helps quell errant stress response. www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/relaxation-techniques-breath-control-helps-quell-errant-stress-response. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Bernstein DA, Borkovec TD. Progressive relaxation training: a manual for the helping professions. Champaign, IL: Research Press; 1973.
- Whisman MA, Baucom DH. Intimate relationships and psychopathology. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2012; 15:4–13.
Chronic pelvic pain is a common clinical problem in women, as prevalent in primary care as asthma or back pain.1,2 It is often associated with lost work days and decreased productivity, increased healthcare spending, mood disorders, and negative effects on personal relationships.1–3
While specialty care referral may eventually be indicated, primary care doctors can take steps to diagnose and effectively manage the condition.
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT LED BY PRIMARY CARE
Chronic pelvic pain is defined as pain in the lower abdomen persisting for 3 to 6 months and of sufficient severity to require medical care or cause a functional disability.3 It is often detrimental to a woman’s personal life and overall health, making a comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary approach to management especially important.
The ideal care-delivery model is the patient-centered medical home, whereby a primary care physician coordinates comprehensive care with the help of an interdisciplinary team.4,5 For complex cases, referral may be needed to other specialties (eg, obstetrics and gynecology, pain medicine) to help manage care.
TARGETED EVALUATION
Chronic pelvic pain often coexists with other systemic pain syndromes or psychiatric conditions common in primary care. Table 1 lists common causes and associated findings.
Detailed history is critical
The history is of utmost importance. Clinicians should query patients about the characteristics of the pain as well as their medical and surgical history. Particular attention should be given to obtaining a complete gynecologic history, including pregnancy, delivery complications, dyspareunia, sexual assault, and trauma. A detailed review of systems should focus on the reproductive, gastroenterologic, musculoskeletal, urologic, and neuropsychiatric systems.
As with many pain syndromes, allowing the patient to “tell her story” helps to establish rapport and obtain a more complete assessment. Chronic pelvic pain has been associated with physical or sexual abuse as a child or adult, so is essential to foster the doctor-patient relationship and create a safe and open space for disclosure.3,6 It is important to screen women for safety at home as well as for satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their relationships with their spouse or partner and family.
Physical examination
The physical examination should be directed by the history but should always include abdominal and pelvic examinations. These should be conducted slowly and gently, assessing for areas of tenderness, masses, and other abnormalities. Clinicians should aim to pinpoint the exact anatomic locations of tenderness if possible. Ongoing dialogue facilitates this process by inquiring about pain at each point of the examination.
The pelvic examination should begin with visual inspection for redness, discharge, lesions, fissures, excoriations, and other abnormalities. A moistened cotton swab may be used to evaluate the vulva and vestibule for localized tenderness. The manual portion of the pelvic examination should begin with a single digit, noting any introital tenderness or spasm. Next, the levator ani muscles should be directly palpated for tone and tenderness. The pelvic floor should be evaluated with attention to tenderness of the bladder or musculoskeletal structures (Figure 1). A bimanual examination assessing uterine size and tenderness, nodularity, or a fixed, immobile uterus should be conducted.
Diagnostic workup
Because the differential diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain is broad, the diagnostic workup and testing should be based on findings of the history and physical examination. In general, extensive laboratory testing is of limited use for evaluating women with chronic pelvic pain.3,7
Urinalysis should be obtained for symptoms suggesting bladder involvement such as interstitial cystitis.
Pelvic ultrasonography can help identify pelvic masses palpated during the physical examination, but routine use of imaging is not recommended.3,7 If pelvic congestion syndrome is suspected, starting with pelvic ultrasonography is reasonable before incurring the risk or cost of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.8
GENERAL TREATMENT
Medical therapy
The main goals of medical therapy are to improve function and quality of life while minimizing adverse effects. General treatments include the following:
Analgesics. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen may provide pain relief, although there is weak evidence for their efficacy in treating chronic pelvic pain.9
Neuropathic agents. One of several available neuropathic agents commonly used in the treatment of chronic pain can be tried on patients who fail to respond to analgesics. Tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline and imipramine decrease pain, reduce symptoms of depression, and improve sleep.10 The results of a small randomized controlled trial suggest that gabapentin is more effective than amitriptyline for reducing chronic pelvic pain.11,12 Published guidelines currently list both amitriptyline and gabapentin as first-line agents; nortriptyline and pregabalin are considered acceptable initial alternatives.9
Venlafaxine and duloxetine may help chronic pelvic pain, although specific evidence is lacking. Duloxetine may be an appropriate choice for women with chronic pelvic pain who also experience depression and urinary stress incontinence.9
Opioids. Opioid therapy should be considered only when all other reasonable therapies have failed.10 Patients may develop tolerance or dependence, as well as opioid-induced adverse effects such as hyperalgesia.9,10 Guidelines recommend that primary care providers consult with a pain management specialist before prescribing opioids, and that patients be thoroughly counseled about the risks and side effects.9
Nerve block and neuromodulation. There is weak evidence for the use of these modalities for treating chronic pelvic pain.9 If used, they should be part of a broader treatment plan and should be performed by providers who specialize in management of chronic pain.
DISEASE-SPECIFIC TREATMENT
Endometriosis: Hormonal therapy
Pelvic pain that significantly fluctuates with the menstrual cycle may be caused by endometriosis, the most common gynecologic cause of chronic pelvic pain. Women with cyclic chronic pelvic pain should be empirically treated with hormonal therapy for at least 3 to 6 months before diagnostic laparoscopy is performed.13
Oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, progestogens, and danazol have proven efficacy, although side-effect profiles differ significantly. In a comparative trial, patients treated with GnRH analogues had more improvement in pain scores compared with those treated with oral contraceptives, but they experienced a significant decrease in bone mineral density.11 The effects on bone mineral density associated with GnRH analogue therapy can be mitigated by “add-back” low-dose hormonal therapy (norethindrone, low-dose estrogen, or a combination of estrogen and progesterone), which may also provide symptomatic relief for associated hot flashes and vaginal symptoms.11
Interstitial cystitis often accompanies endometriosis
Recognizing that chronic pelvic pain may have more than one cause is important when developing a comprehensive care plan. Interstitial cystitis coexists with endometriosis in up to 60% of patients.14 Initial treatment is pentosan polysulfate sodium, an oral treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for interstitial cystitis that works by restoring the protective glycosaminoglycan layer in the bladder.14,15 Amitriptyline may also be used to treat interstitial cystitis-associated nocturia.
Myofascial pain: Neuromuscular blockers
According to a recent systematic review of therapies for chronic pelvic pain, patients with symptoms related to myofascial pain may benefit from neuromuscular blockade.12 One randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin A vs saline for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic floor spasm found that after 6 months of observation, women who received botulinum toxin had significantly lower pain scores than those who received saline.12
Pelvic congestion syndrome: Multiple options
Pelvic congestion syndrome may be treated with hormonal, radiologic, or surgical therapy.16 A randomized controlled trial involving patients with chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic congestion demonstrated that treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate or a GnRH agonist (goserelin) improved pelvic symptoms.17
A Cochrane review of nonsurgical interventions for chronic pelvic pain included women with a diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome or adhesions. It found that patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate were more likely to have 50% pain reduction lasting up to 9 months compared with patients taking placebo.12 In comparative studies, GnRH analogues were more effective in relieving pelvic pain than progestogen therapy.
Radiologic embolization therapy is as effective as hysterectomy for the relief of chronic pelvic pain related to pelvic congestion syndrome, and it can be performed in the outpatient setting.
Irritable bowel syndrome: Try dietary changes
Symptoms of chronic pelvic pain that are associated with changes in stool consistency and frequency suggest irritable bowel syndrome. Symptoms may improve with dietary changes and fiber supplementation. Antispasmodic agents are frequently used but their anticholinergic effects may worsen constipation.14
PELVIC PHYSICAL THERAPY
Pelvic physical therapy targets the musculoskeletal components of bowel, bladder, and sexual function to restore strength, flexibility, balance, and coordination to the pelvic floor and surrounding lumbopelvic muscles. Patients with dyspareunia, pain with activity, or a significant musculoskeletal abnormality (eg, vaginismus or point tenderness on examination) are particularly good candidates for this therapy. It is done by a physical therapist with special training in techniques to manipulate the pelvic floor to address pelvic pain.
Educating the patient
Informing the patient before the initial physical therapy visit is essential for success. Referring clinicians should emphasize to patients that treatment response can help to guide further physician intervention. Patients should be counseled that pelvic physical therapy includes a pelvic examination and an expectation to participate in a home program. Although noticeable improvement takes time, encouragement provided by the entire team, including medical providers, can help a patient maintain her care plan.
Therapists typically see a patient once a week for 8 to 12 visits initially. Insurance usually covers pelvic physical therapy through the same policy as routine physical therapy.
During the initial evaluation, the patient receives an external and internal pelvic examination assessing muscle length, strength, and coordination of the back, hip, and internal pelvic floor. Internal evaluation can be done vaginally or rectally, with one gloved finger, without the need for speculum or stirrups. Biofeedback and surface electromyography (using either perianal or internal electrode placement) are used to evaluate muscle activity and to assist the patient in developing appropriate motor control during strengthening or relaxation.18
Up-training (or strengthening) aims to improve pelvic floor endurance. It can improve pelvic instability and symptoms of heaviness and discomfort from prolapse. Patients learn to appropriately utilize the pelvic floor in isolation. If a patient is too weak to contract on her own, neuromuscular electrical stimulation is used with an internal electrode to provide an assisted contraction.
Down-training (or relaxation) focuses on reducing tone in overactive pelvic muscles. It can improve symptoms of chronic pelvic pain, sexual pain, vulvodynia, and pudendal neuralgias. Patients are made aware of chronic holding patterns that lead to excess tone in the pelvic floor and learn how to release them through stretching, cardiovascular activity, meditation, and manual release of the involved muscle groups internally and externally. Internal musculature can be manipulated by a therapist in clinic or by the patient’s trained partner; the patient can also reach necessary areas with a vaginal dilator.
Functional coordination of the pelvic floor is needed for comfortable vaginal penetration and defecation. Training with biofeedback improves a patient’s ability to relax and open the pelvic floor.18 Vaginal dilators with surface electromyography are used to treat vaginismus to eliminate reflexive pelvic floor spasm during penetration. Perineal and vaginal compliance can be improved through manual release techniques with hands or vaginal dilators to restore normal mobility of tissues. This can reduce pain from postsurgical changes, postpartum sequelae, atrophic vaginal changes, shortened muscles from chronic holding, and adhesions.
PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS
Pelvic pain is not only a biomedical difficulty; psychosocial factors can contribute to and be affected by pelvic pain. Patients with pelvic pain often experience lower quality of life, higher rates of anxiety and depression, and increased stress compared with others.19,20 People with pain also have more relationship stress, and patients’ partners often experience emotional distress, isolation, and feelings of powerlessness in the relationship.21
Psychosocial interventions, provided along with biomedical treatment, can help to reduce pain, anxiety, and depression and improve relational well-being.22,23 In addition to attending to pain-related symptoms, comprehensive care involves recognizing and treating coexisting anxiety, depression, stress, and relationship conflict. Interventions for these difficulties are many, and a comprehensive list of interventions is beyond the focus of this section.19
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy is based on the idea that maladaptive cognitions can lead to problematic behaviors and emotional distress.24 Interventions are carried out by a provider with specialized training in its use (eg, therapist, pain psychologist, psychiatrist).
Meta-analyses of studies that investigated the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain found consistent small to medium improvement in pain-related symptoms.24 Studies that used cognitive behavioral therapy for pelvic pain found reduced overall pain severity and pain during intercourse, increased sexual satisfaction, enhanced sexual function, and less-exaggerated responses to pain.25–27
Although cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based interventions produce positive outcomes, research on these interventions typically includes treatment carried out over a span of weeks. Common barriers to such care include lack of patient motivation, financial limitations, transportation problems, and time constraints.
The following psychosocial interventions have been chosen because they can be delivered in a short amount of time and integrated into a patient’s medical care by a medical or behavioral health provider. Because of the brevity and simplicity of these interventions, more patients with pelvic pain can receive psychosocial care as part of their usual medical encounters.
Behavioral activation
People experiencing depressive symptoms tend to isolate themselves and stop participating in activities they enjoy, including spending time with family and friends. Behavioral activation interventions that address such isolating behaviors have been shown to be effective in improving depressive symptoms.28–30
A simple, brief intervention can be administered during routine medical care,28 involving the following steps:
- Determine activities that the patient might implement that would decrease depressive symptoms. Questions such as, “When do you feel less depressed?” or “What brings you some happiness in your life?” can generate possible activities.
- Ask the patient to identify people in her life who have been supportive and with whom she could engage.
- Create with the patient a list of possible activities and social interactions that may enhance well-being.
- Make a schedule for participating in activities, possibly with rewards for completing them. Patients should be encouraged to follow the prescribed schedule of activities rather than make decisions based on mood or other factors.
Relaxation strategies
Relaxation can help patients reduce stress and anxiety, and can also help reduce pain.31–33
Diaphragmatic or “belly breathing” is a deep-breathing technique in which participants are asked to take in air through the nose and fully fill the lungs and lower belly. This technique allows the body to take in more oxygen, helping to lower blood pressure and slow the heartbeat. In addition to physiologic benefits, concentrating on deep breathing can help slow down or stop intrusive thoughts and distressing physical sensations.34
Progressive muscle relaxation involves the systematic tensing and relaxing of each large muscle group in the body.35 The goal is to eliminate physical and emotional stress through focusing on the sensations of tension and relaxation.
Scripts and audio and video resources for belly breathing and progressive muscle relaxation can be found on the Internet. The techniques can be taught during the medical appointment or offered as resources for home practice.
Couple-based care
Targeting couples is more effective for improving well-being than focusing solely on a patient’s psychosocial difficulties, so each of the above interventions may be more effective if tailored to include the patient’s partner.36 If the partner is with the patient during medical visits or is included in long-term psychosocial treatment, he or she can be directly involved in learning and practicing interventions with the patient. If the partner is not present, the patient can be asked to practice newly learned well-being-enhancing strategies with her partner outside the appointment time. Couples therapy can improve psychosocial well-being for both partners.
Setting goals
Chronic pelvic pain is a common clinical problem in women, as prevalent in primary care as asthma or back pain.1,2 It is often associated with lost work days and decreased productivity, increased healthcare spending, mood disorders, and negative effects on personal relationships.1–3
While specialty care referral may eventually be indicated, primary care doctors can take steps to diagnose and effectively manage the condition.
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT LED BY PRIMARY CARE
Chronic pelvic pain is defined as pain in the lower abdomen persisting for 3 to 6 months and of sufficient severity to require medical care or cause a functional disability.3 It is often detrimental to a woman’s personal life and overall health, making a comprehensive assessment and multidisciplinary approach to management especially important.
The ideal care-delivery model is the patient-centered medical home, whereby a primary care physician coordinates comprehensive care with the help of an interdisciplinary team.4,5 For complex cases, referral may be needed to other specialties (eg, obstetrics and gynecology, pain medicine) to help manage care.
TARGETED EVALUATION
Chronic pelvic pain often coexists with other systemic pain syndromes or psychiatric conditions common in primary care. Table 1 lists common causes and associated findings.
Detailed history is critical
The history is of utmost importance. Clinicians should query patients about the characteristics of the pain as well as their medical and surgical history. Particular attention should be given to obtaining a complete gynecologic history, including pregnancy, delivery complications, dyspareunia, sexual assault, and trauma. A detailed review of systems should focus on the reproductive, gastroenterologic, musculoskeletal, urologic, and neuropsychiatric systems.
As with many pain syndromes, allowing the patient to “tell her story” helps to establish rapport and obtain a more complete assessment. Chronic pelvic pain has been associated with physical or sexual abuse as a child or adult, so is essential to foster the doctor-patient relationship and create a safe and open space for disclosure.3,6 It is important to screen women for safety at home as well as for satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their relationships with their spouse or partner and family.
Physical examination
The physical examination should be directed by the history but should always include abdominal and pelvic examinations. These should be conducted slowly and gently, assessing for areas of tenderness, masses, and other abnormalities. Clinicians should aim to pinpoint the exact anatomic locations of tenderness if possible. Ongoing dialogue facilitates this process by inquiring about pain at each point of the examination.
The pelvic examination should begin with visual inspection for redness, discharge, lesions, fissures, excoriations, and other abnormalities. A moistened cotton swab may be used to evaluate the vulva and vestibule for localized tenderness. The manual portion of the pelvic examination should begin with a single digit, noting any introital tenderness or spasm. Next, the levator ani muscles should be directly palpated for tone and tenderness. The pelvic floor should be evaluated with attention to tenderness of the bladder or musculoskeletal structures (Figure 1). A bimanual examination assessing uterine size and tenderness, nodularity, or a fixed, immobile uterus should be conducted.
Diagnostic workup
Because the differential diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain is broad, the diagnostic workup and testing should be based on findings of the history and physical examination. In general, extensive laboratory testing is of limited use for evaluating women with chronic pelvic pain.3,7
Urinalysis should be obtained for symptoms suggesting bladder involvement such as interstitial cystitis.
Pelvic ultrasonography can help identify pelvic masses palpated during the physical examination, but routine use of imaging is not recommended.3,7 If pelvic congestion syndrome is suspected, starting with pelvic ultrasonography is reasonable before incurring the risk or cost of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.8
GENERAL TREATMENT
Medical therapy
The main goals of medical therapy are to improve function and quality of life while minimizing adverse effects. General treatments include the following:
Analgesics. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen may provide pain relief, although there is weak evidence for their efficacy in treating chronic pelvic pain.9
Neuropathic agents. One of several available neuropathic agents commonly used in the treatment of chronic pain can be tried on patients who fail to respond to analgesics. Tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline and imipramine decrease pain, reduce symptoms of depression, and improve sleep.10 The results of a small randomized controlled trial suggest that gabapentin is more effective than amitriptyline for reducing chronic pelvic pain.11,12 Published guidelines currently list both amitriptyline and gabapentin as first-line agents; nortriptyline and pregabalin are considered acceptable initial alternatives.9
Venlafaxine and duloxetine may help chronic pelvic pain, although specific evidence is lacking. Duloxetine may be an appropriate choice for women with chronic pelvic pain who also experience depression and urinary stress incontinence.9
Opioids. Opioid therapy should be considered only when all other reasonable therapies have failed.10 Patients may develop tolerance or dependence, as well as opioid-induced adverse effects such as hyperalgesia.9,10 Guidelines recommend that primary care providers consult with a pain management specialist before prescribing opioids, and that patients be thoroughly counseled about the risks and side effects.9
Nerve block and neuromodulation. There is weak evidence for the use of these modalities for treating chronic pelvic pain.9 If used, they should be part of a broader treatment plan and should be performed by providers who specialize in management of chronic pain.
DISEASE-SPECIFIC TREATMENT
Endometriosis: Hormonal therapy
Pelvic pain that significantly fluctuates with the menstrual cycle may be caused by endometriosis, the most common gynecologic cause of chronic pelvic pain. Women with cyclic chronic pelvic pain should be empirically treated with hormonal therapy for at least 3 to 6 months before diagnostic laparoscopy is performed.13
Oral contraceptives, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, progestogens, and danazol have proven efficacy, although side-effect profiles differ significantly. In a comparative trial, patients treated with GnRH analogues had more improvement in pain scores compared with those treated with oral contraceptives, but they experienced a significant decrease in bone mineral density.11 The effects on bone mineral density associated with GnRH analogue therapy can be mitigated by “add-back” low-dose hormonal therapy (norethindrone, low-dose estrogen, or a combination of estrogen and progesterone), which may also provide symptomatic relief for associated hot flashes and vaginal symptoms.11
Interstitial cystitis often accompanies endometriosis
Recognizing that chronic pelvic pain may have more than one cause is important when developing a comprehensive care plan. Interstitial cystitis coexists with endometriosis in up to 60% of patients.14 Initial treatment is pentosan polysulfate sodium, an oral treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for interstitial cystitis that works by restoring the protective glycosaminoglycan layer in the bladder.14,15 Amitriptyline may also be used to treat interstitial cystitis-associated nocturia.
Myofascial pain: Neuromuscular blockers
According to a recent systematic review of therapies for chronic pelvic pain, patients with symptoms related to myofascial pain may benefit from neuromuscular blockade.12 One randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin A vs saline for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic floor spasm found that after 6 months of observation, women who received botulinum toxin had significantly lower pain scores than those who received saline.12
Pelvic congestion syndrome: Multiple options
Pelvic congestion syndrome may be treated with hormonal, radiologic, or surgical therapy.16 A randomized controlled trial involving patients with chronic pelvic pain secondary to pelvic congestion demonstrated that treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate or a GnRH agonist (goserelin) improved pelvic symptoms.17
A Cochrane review of nonsurgical interventions for chronic pelvic pain included women with a diagnosis of pelvic congestion syndrome or adhesions. It found that patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate were more likely to have 50% pain reduction lasting up to 9 months compared with patients taking placebo.12 In comparative studies, GnRH analogues were more effective in relieving pelvic pain than progestogen therapy.
Radiologic embolization therapy is as effective as hysterectomy for the relief of chronic pelvic pain related to pelvic congestion syndrome, and it can be performed in the outpatient setting.
Irritable bowel syndrome: Try dietary changes
Symptoms of chronic pelvic pain that are associated with changes in stool consistency and frequency suggest irritable bowel syndrome. Symptoms may improve with dietary changes and fiber supplementation. Antispasmodic agents are frequently used but their anticholinergic effects may worsen constipation.14
PELVIC PHYSICAL THERAPY
Pelvic physical therapy targets the musculoskeletal components of bowel, bladder, and sexual function to restore strength, flexibility, balance, and coordination to the pelvic floor and surrounding lumbopelvic muscles. Patients with dyspareunia, pain with activity, or a significant musculoskeletal abnormality (eg, vaginismus or point tenderness on examination) are particularly good candidates for this therapy. It is done by a physical therapist with special training in techniques to manipulate the pelvic floor to address pelvic pain.
Educating the patient
Informing the patient before the initial physical therapy visit is essential for success. Referring clinicians should emphasize to patients that treatment response can help to guide further physician intervention. Patients should be counseled that pelvic physical therapy includes a pelvic examination and an expectation to participate in a home program. Although noticeable improvement takes time, encouragement provided by the entire team, including medical providers, can help a patient maintain her care plan.
Therapists typically see a patient once a week for 8 to 12 visits initially. Insurance usually covers pelvic physical therapy through the same policy as routine physical therapy.
During the initial evaluation, the patient receives an external and internal pelvic examination assessing muscle length, strength, and coordination of the back, hip, and internal pelvic floor. Internal evaluation can be done vaginally or rectally, with one gloved finger, without the need for speculum or stirrups. Biofeedback and surface electromyography (using either perianal or internal electrode placement) are used to evaluate muscle activity and to assist the patient in developing appropriate motor control during strengthening or relaxation.18
Up-training (or strengthening) aims to improve pelvic floor endurance. It can improve pelvic instability and symptoms of heaviness and discomfort from prolapse. Patients learn to appropriately utilize the pelvic floor in isolation. If a patient is too weak to contract on her own, neuromuscular electrical stimulation is used with an internal electrode to provide an assisted contraction.
Down-training (or relaxation) focuses on reducing tone in overactive pelvic muscles. It can improve symptoms of chronic pelvic pain, sexual pain, vulvodynia, and pudendal neuralgias. Patients are made aware of chronic holding patterns that lead to excess tone in the pelvic floor and learn how to release them through stretching, cardiovascular activity, meditation, and manual release of the involved muscle groups internally and externally. Internal musculature can be manipulated by a therapist in clinic or by the patient’s trained partner; the patient can also reach necessary areas with a vaginal dilator.
Functional coordination of the pelvic floor is needed for comfortable vaginal penetration and defecation. Training with biofeedback improves a patient’s ability to relax and open the pelvic floor.18 Vaginal dilators with surface electromyography are used to treat vaginismus to eliminate reflexive pelvic floor spasm during penetration. Perineal and vaginal compliance can be improved through manual release techniques with hands or vaginal dilators to restore normal mobility of tissues. This can reduce pain from postsurgical changes, postpartum sequelae, atrophic vaginal changes, shortened muscles from chronic holding, and adhesions.
PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS
Pelvic pain is not only a biomedical difficulty; psychosocial factors can contribute to and be affected by pelvic pain. Patients with pelvic pain often experience lower quality of life, higher rates of anxiety and depression, and increased stress compared with others.19,20 People with pain also have more relationship stress, and patients’ partners often experience emotional distress, isolation, and feelings of powerlessness in the relationship.21
Psychosocial interventions, provided along with biomedical treatment, can help to reduce pain, anxiety, and depression and improve relational well-being.22,23 In addition to attending to pain-related symptoms, comprehensive care involves recognizing and treating coexisting anxiety, depression, stress, and relationship conflict. Interventions for these difficulties are many, and a comprehensive list of interventions is beyond the focus of this section.19
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Cognitive behavioral therapy is based on the idea that maladaptive cognitions can lead to problematic behaviors and emotional distress.24 Interventions are carried out by a provider with specialized training in its use (eg, therapist, pain psychologist, psychiatrist).
Meta-analyses of studies that investigated the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain found consistent small to medium improvement in pain-related symptoms.24 Studies that used cognitive behavioral therapy for pelvic pain found reduced overall pain severity and pain during intercourse, increased sexual satisfaction, enhanced sexual function, and less-exaggerated responses to pain.25–27
Although cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based interventions produce positive outcomes, research on these interventions typically includes treatment carried out over a span of weeks. Common barriers to such care include lack of patient motivation, financial limitations, transportation problems, and time constraints.
The following psychosocial interventions have been chosen because they can be delivered in a short amount of time and integrated into a patient’s medical care by a medical or behavioral health provider. Because of the brevity and simplicity of these interventions, more patients with pelvic pain can receive psychosocial care as part of their usual medical encounters.
Behavioral activation
People experiencing depressive symptoms tend to isolate themselves and stop participating in activities they enjoy, including spending time with family and friends. Behavioral activation interventions that address such isolating behaviors have been shown to be effective in improving depressive symptoms.28–30
A simple, brief intervention can be administered during routine medical care,28 involving the following steps:
- Determine activities that the patient might implement that would decrease depressive symptoms. Questions such as, “When do you feel less depressed?” or “What brings you some happiness in your life?” can generate possible activities.
- Ask the patient to identify people in her life who have been supportive and with whom she could engage.
- Create with the patient a list of possible activities and social interactions that may enhance well-being.
- Make a schedule for participating in activities, possibly with rewards for completing them. Patients should be encouraged to follow the prescribed schedule of activities rather than make decisions based on mood or other factors.
Relaxation strategies
Relaxation can help patients reduce stress and anxiety, and can also help reduce pain.31–33
Diaphragmatic or “belly breathing” is a deep-breathing technique in which participants are asked to take in air through the nose and fully fill the lungs and lower belly. This technique allows the body to take in more oxygen, helping to lower blood pressure and slow the heartbeat. In addition to physiologic benefits, concentrating on deep breathing can help slow down or stop intrusive thoughts and distressing physical sensations.34
Progressive muscle relaxation involves the systematic tensing and relaxing of each large muscle group in the body.35 The goal is to eliminate physical and emotional stress through focusing on the sensations of tension and relaxation.
Scripts and audio and video resources for belly breathing and progressive muscle relaxation can be found on the Internet. The techniques can be taught during the medical appointment or offered as resources for home practice.
Couple-based care
Targeting couples is more effective for improving well-being than focusing solely on a patient’s psychosocial difficulties, so each of the above interventions may be more effective if tailored to include the patient’s partner.36 If the partner is with the patient during medical visits or is included in long-term psychosocial treatment, he or she can be directly involved in learning and practicing interventions with the patient. If the partner is not present, the patient can be asked to practice newly learned well-being-enhancing strategies with her partner outside the appointment time. Couples therapy can improve psychosocial well-being for both partners.
Setting goals
- Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behavior. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51:541–547.
- Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Lipschutz RC, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 81:321–327.
- Howard FM. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:594–611.
- AHRQ PCMH Resource Center. Transforming the organization and delivery of primary care. www.pcmh.ahrq.gov/. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Pryzbylkowski P, Ashburn MA. The pain medical home: a patient-centered medical home model of care for patients with chronic pain. Anesthesiol Clin 2015; 33:785–793.
- Jamieson DJ, Steege JF. The association of sexual abuse with pelvic pain complaints in a primary care population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:1408–1412.
- Gambone JC, Mittman BS, Munro MG, Scialli AR, Winkel CA; Chronic Pelvic Pain/Endometriosis Working Group. Consensus statement for the management of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: proceedings of an expert-panel consensus process. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:961–972.
- Ganeshan A, Upponi S, Hon LQ, Uthappa MC, Warakaulle DR, Uberoi R. Chronic pelvic pain due to pelvic congestion syndrome: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30:1105–1111.
- Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Elneil S, et al; European Association of Urology. Guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Chronic-Pelvic-Pain-2015.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2018.
- Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Abbiati A, Barbara G, Fedele L. Medical, surgical and alternative treatments for chronic pelvic pain in women: a descriptive review. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009; 25:208–221.
- Rafique S, DeCherney AH. Medical management of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60:485–496.
- Cheong YC, Smotra G, Williams AC. Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 3:CD008797.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The initial management of chronic pelvic pain, Green-top guideline No.41. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_41.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Shin JH, Howard FM. Management of chronic pelvic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011; 15:377–385.
- Nelson P, Apte G, Justiz R, Brismee JM, Dedrick G, Sizer PS. Chronic female pelvic pain—Part 2: differential diagnosis and management. Pain Pract 2012; 12:111–141.
- Holloran-Schwartz MB. Surgical evaluation and treatment of the patient with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41:357–369.
- Soysal ME, Soysal S, Vicdan K, Ozer S. A randomized controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:931–939.
- Arnouk A, De E, Rehfuss A, Cappadocia C, Dickson S, Lian F. Physical, complementary, and alternative medicine in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders. Curr Urol Rep 2017; 18:47.
- Faccin F, Barbara G, Saita E, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and mental health: pelvic pain makes the difference. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 36:135–141.
- Naliboff BD, Stephens AJ, Afari N, et al; MAPP Research Network. Widespread psychosocial difficulties in men and women with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndromes: case-control findings from the multidisciplinary approach to the study of chronic pelvic pain research network. Urology 2015; 85:1319–1327.
- West C, Usher K, Foster K, Stewart L. Chronic pain and the family: the experience of the partners of people living with chronic pain. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21:3352–3360.
- Khatri P, Mays K. Brief interventions in primary care. www.integration.samhsa.gov/Brief_Intervention_in_PC,_pdf.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Roy-Byrne P, Veitengruber JP, Bystritsky A, et al. Brief intervention for anxiety in primary care patients. J Am Board Fam Med 2009; 22:175–186.
- Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res 2012; 36:427–440.
- Masheb RM, Kerns RD, Lozano C, Minkin MJ, Richman S. A randomized clinical trial for women with vulvodynia: cognitive-behavioral therapy vs. supportive psychotherapy. Pain 2009; 141:31–40.
- ter Kuile MM, Weijenborg PT. A cognitive-behavioral group program for women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome (VVS): factors associated with treatment success. J Sex Marital Ther 2006; 32:199–213.
- Bergeron S, Khalifé S, Glazer HI, Binik YM. Surgical and behavioral treatments for vestibulodynia: two-and-one-half year follow-up and predictors of outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:159–166.
- Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L. Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2007; 27:318–326.
- Mazzucchelli T, Kane R, Rees C. Behavioral activation treatments for depression in adults: a meta-analysis and review. Clin Psychol Sci Practice 2009; 16:383–411.
- Riebe G, Fan MY, Unützer J, Vannoy S. Activity scheduling as a core component of effective care management for late-life depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27:1298–1304.
- Chen YF, Huang XY, Chien CH, Cheng JF. The effectiveness of diaphragmatic breathing relaxation training for reducing anxiety. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2017; 53:329–336.
- Klainin-Yobas P, Oo WN, Yew PYS, Lau Y. Effects of relaxation interventions on depression and anxiety among older adults: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health 2015; 19:1043–1055.
- Finlay KA, Rogers J. Maximizing self-care through familiarity: the role of practice effects in enhancing music listening and progressive muscle relaxation for pain management. Psychology of Music 2015; 43:511–529.
- Harvard Health Publications; Harvard Medical School. Relaxation techniques: breath control helps quell errant stress response. www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/relaxation-techniques-breath-control-helps-quell-errant-stress-response. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Bernstein DA, Borkovec TD. Progressive relaxation training: a manual for the helping professions. Champaign, IL: Research Press; 1973.
- Whisman MA, Baucom DH. Intimate relationships and psychopathology. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2012; 15:4–13.
- Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, et al. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behavior. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51:541–547.
- Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Lipschutz RC, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 81:321–327.
- Howard FM. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:594–611.
- AHRQ PCMH Resource Center. Transforming the organization and delivery of primary care. www.pcmh.ahrq.gov/. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Pryzbylkowski P, Ashburn MA. The pain medical home: a patient-centered medical home model of care for patients with chronic pain. Anesthesiol Clin 2015; 33:785–793.
- Jamieson DJ, Steege JF. The association of sexual abuse with pelvic pain complaints in a primary care population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177:1408–1412.
- Gambone JC, Mittman BS, Munro MG, Scialli AR, Winkel CA; Chronic Pelvic Pain/Endometriosis Working Group. Consensus statement for the management of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: proceedings of an expert-panel consensus process. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:961–972.
- Ganeshan A, Upponi S, Hon LQ, Uthappa MC, Warakaulle DR, Uberoi R. Chronic pelvic pain due to pelvic congestion syndrome: the role of diagnostic and interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30:1105–1111.
- Engeler D, Baranowski AP, Elneil S, et al; European Association of Urology. Guidelines on chronic pelvic pain. http://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-Chronic-Pelvic-Pain-2015.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2018.
- Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Abbiati A, Barbara G, Fedele L. Medical, surgical and alternative treatments for chronic pelvic pain in women: a descriptive review. Gynecol Endocrinol 2009; 25:208–221.
- Rafique S, DeCherney AH. Medical management of endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017; 60:485–496.
- Cheong YC, Smotra G, Williams AC. Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 3:CD008797.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The initial management of chronic pelvic pain, Green-top guideline No.41. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_41.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Shin JH, Howard FM. Management of chronic pelvic pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011; 15:377–385.
- Nelson P, Apte G, Justiz R, Brismee JM, Dedrick G, Sizer PS. Chronic female pelvic pain—Part 2: differential diagnosis and management. Pain Pract 2012; 12:111–141.
- Holloran-Schwartz MB. Surgical evaluation and treatment of the patient with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2014; 41:357–369.
- Soysal ME, Soysal S, Vicdan K, Ozer S. A randomized controlled trial of goserelin and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic congestion. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:931–939.
- Arnouk A, De E, Rehfuss A, Cappadocia C, Dickson S, Lian F. Physical, complementary, and alternative medicine in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders. Curr Urol Rep 2017; 18:47.
- Faccin F, Barbara G, Saita E, et al. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and mental health: pelvic pain makes the difference. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 36:135–141.
- Naliboff BD, Stephens AJ, Afari N, et al; MAPP Research Network. Widespread psychosocial difficulties in men and women with urologic chronic pelvic pain syndromes: case-control findings from the multidisciplinary approach to the study of chronic pelvic pain research network. Urology 2015; 85:1319–1327.
- West C, Usher K, Foster K, Stewart L. Chronic pain and the family: the experience of the partners of people living with chronic pain. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21:3352–3360.
- Khatri P, Mays K. Brief interventions in primary care. www.integration.samhsa.gov/Brief_Intervention_in_PC,_pdf.pdf. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Roy-Byrne P, Veitengruber JP, Bystritsky A, et al. Brief intervention for anxiety in primary care patients. J Am Board Fam Med 2009; 22:175–186.
- Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cognit Ther Res 2012; 36:427–440.
- Masheb RM, Kerns RD, Lozano C, Minkin MJ, Richman S. A randomized clinical trial for women with vulvodynia: cognitive-behavioral therapy vs. supportive psychotherapy. Pain 2009; 141:31–40.
- ter Kuile MM, Weijenborg PT. A cognitive-behavioral group program for women with vulvar vestibulitis syndrome (VVS): factors associated with treatment success. J Sex Marital Ther 2006; 32:199–213.
- Bergeron S, Khalifé S, Glazer HI, Binik YM. Surgical and behavioral treatments for vestibulodynia: two-and-one-half year follow-up and predictors of outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111:159–166.
- Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Warmerdam L. Behavioral activation treatments of depression: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2007; 27:318–326.
- Mazzucchelli T, Kane R, Rees C. Behavioral activation treatments for depression in adults: a meta-analysis and review. Clin Psychol Sci Practice 2009; 16:383–411.
- Riebe G, Fan MY, Unützer J, Vannoy S. Activity scheduling as a core component of effective care management for late-life depression. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27:1298–1304.
- Chen YF, Huang XY, Chien CH, Cheng JF. The effectiveness of diaphragmatic breathing relaxation training for reducing anxiety. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2017; 53:329–336.
- Klainin-Yobas P, Oo WN, Yew PYS, Lau Y. Effects of relaxation interventions on depression and anxiety among older adults: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health 2015; 19:1043–1055.
- Finlay KA, Rogers J. Maximizing self-care through familiarity: the role of practice effects in enhancing music listening and progressive muscle relaxation for pain management. Psychology of Music 2015; 43:511–529.
- Harvard Health Publications; Harvard Medical School. Relaxation techniques: breath control helps quell errant stress response. www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/relaxation-techniques-breath-control-helps-quell-errant-stress-response. Accessed February 2, 2018.
- Bernstein DA, Borkovec TD. Progressive relaxation training: a manual for the helping professions. Champaign, IL: Research Press; 1973.
- Whisman MA, Baucom DH. Intimate relationships and psychopathology. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2012; 15:4–13.
KEY POINTS
- Diagnosing and managing chronic pelvic pain may be difficult, but patients are often best served when their primary care provider directs a team-based approach to their care.
- A detailed history, thorough abdominal and pelvic examinations, and targeted testing facilitate the diagnosis.
- As in other chronic pain syndromes, the goals of therapy should be incremental and meaningful improvements in pain, function, and overall well-being.
Deprescribing: When trying for less is more
Sometimes the answer is straightforward—the pills were started to reduce knee pain, but the pain is still there. But sometimes if I suggest stopping a drug, I get surprising pushback from the patient: “But the pain may be worse without those pills.” And it can be hard to assess whether a medication has attained its therapeutic goal, such as when a drug is given to prevent or reduce the occurrence of intermittent events (eg, hydroxychloroquine to reduce flares in lupus, aspirin to prevent transient ischemic attacks). Unless a medication has been given sufficient time to have its effect and has clearly failed, we often have to trust its efficacy because those events might be more frequent if the drug were stopped.
In this issue of the Journal, Kim and Factora discuss a difficult scenario—discontinuing cognitive-enhancing therapy in patients with Alzheimer dementia. The stakes, hopes, and anxiety are high for the patient and caregivers. These drugs have only modest efficacy, and it is often difficult to know if they are working. To complicate matters, dementia is progressive, but the rate of progression differs among individuals, making it harder to be convinced that the drugs have lost their efficacy and that discontinuation is warranted in order to reduce the side effects, cost, and pill burden. Similar challenges arise for similar reasons when considering discontinuation of antipsychotics or other drugs given for behavioral reasons to elderly patients with dementia.1
The issues surrounding downsizing medication lists—or deprescribing—extend far beyond patients with Alzheimer dementia. A disease may have progressed beyond the point where the drug can make a significant impact. Patients often develop tachyphylaxis to the newer protein drugs (biologics for rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, or gout) due to the generation of neutralizing antidrug antibodies. At some point the patient’s life expectancy becomes a factor when considering medications directed at preventing long-term complications of a disease and the increased likelihood of significant adverse effects in patients as they age (eg, from aggressively prescribed antihypertensive and antidiabetic drugs). For drugs such as bisphosphonates, alkylating agents, and metoclopramide, complications of cumulative dosing over time should be considered a reason to discontinue therapy.
The take-home message from this article is to create opportunities to periodically revisit the rationale for all of a patient’s prescriptions, and to make sure patients are comfortable knowing why they should keep taking each of their medications. While revisiting a patient’s prescriptions may indeed reduce the medication burden, I believe it also enhances adherence to the remaining prescribed medications. The medication reconciliation process requires more than simply checking off the box in the EMR to indicate that the medications were “reviewed.”
- Bjerre LM, Farrell B, Hogel M, et al. Deprescribing antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and insomnia: evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Physician 2018; 64(1):17–27.
Sometimes the answer is straightforward—the pills were started to reduce knee pain, but the pain is still there. But sometimes if I suggest stopping a drug, I get surprising pushback from the patient: “But the pain may be worse without those pills.” And it can be hard to assess whether a medication has attained its therapeutic goal, such as when a drug is given to prevent or reduce the occurrence of intermittent events (eg, hydroxychloroquine to reduce flares in lupus, aspirin to prevent transient ischemic attacks). Unless a medication has been given sufficient time to have its effect and has clearly failed, we often have to trust its efficacy because those events might be more frequent if the drug were stopped.
In this issue of the Journal, Kim and Factora discuss a difficult scenario—discontinuing cognitive-enhancing therapy in patients with Alzheimer dementia. The stakes, hopes, and anxiety are high for the patient and caregivers. These drugs have only modest efficacy, and it is often difficult to know if they are working. To complicate matters, dementia is progressive, but the rate of progression differs among individuals, making it harder to be convinced that the drugs have lost their efficacy and that discontinuation is warranted in order to reduce the side effects, cost, and pill burden. Similar challenges arise for similar reasons when considering discontinuation of antipsychotics or other drugs given for behavioral reasons to elderly patients with dementia.1
The issues surrounding downsizing medication lists—or deprescribing—extend far beyond patients with Alzheimer dementia. A disease may have progressed beyond the point where the drug can make a significant impact. Patients often develop tachyphylaxis to the newer protein drugs (biologics for rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, or gout) due to the generation of neutralizing antidrug antibodies. At some point the patient’s life expectancy becomes a factor when considering medications directed at preventing long-term complications of a disease and the increased likelihood of significant adverse effects in patients as they age (eg, from aggressively prescribed antihypertensive and antidiabetic drugs). For drugs such as bisphosphonates, alkylating agents, and metoclopramide, complications of cumulative dosing over time should be considered a reason to discontinue therapy.
The take-home message from this article is to create opportunities to periodically revisit the rationale for all of a patient’s prescriptions, and to make sure patients are comfortable knowing why they should keep taking each of their medications. While revisiting a patient’s prescriptions may indeed reduce the medication burden, I believe it also enhances adherence to the remaining prescribed medications. The medication reconciliation process requires more than simply checking off the box in the EMR to indicate that the medications were “reviewed.”
Sometimes the answer is straightforward—the pills were started to reduce knee pain, but the pain is still there. But sometimes if I suggest stopping a drug, I get surprising pushback from the patient: “But the pain may be worse without those pills.” And it can be hard to assess whether a medication has attained its therapeutic goal, such as when a drug is given to prevent or reduce the occurrence of intermittent events (eg, hydroxychloroquine to reduce flares in lupus, aspirin to prevent transient ischemic attacks). Unless a medication has been given sufficient time to have its effect and has clearly failed, we often have to trust its efficacy because those events might be more frequent if the drug were stopped.
In this issue of the Journal, Kim and Factora discuss a difficult scenario—discontinuing cognitive-enhancing therapy in patients with Alzheimer dementia. The stakes, hopes, and anxiety are high for the patient and caregivers. These drugs have only modest efficacy, and it is often difficult to know if they are working. To complicate matters, dementia is progressive, but the rate of progression differs among individuals, making it harder to be convinced that the drugs have lost their efficacy and that discontinuation is warranted in order to reduce the side effects, cost, and pill burden. Similar challenges arise for similar reasons when considering discontinuation of antipsychotics or other drugs given for behavioral reasons to elderly patients with dementia.1
The issues surrounding downsizing medication lists—or deprescribing—extend far beyond patients with Alzheimer dementia. A disease may have progressed beyond the point where the drug can make a significant impact. Patients often develop tachyphylaxis to the newer protein drugs (biologics for rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis, or gout) due to the generation of neutralizing antidrug antibodies. At some point the patient’s life expectancy becomes a factor when considering medications directed at preventing long-term complications of a disease and the increased likelihood of significant adverse effects in patients as they age (eg, from aggressively prescribed antihypertensive and antidiabetic drugs). For drugs such as bisphosphonates, alkylating agents, and metoclopramide, complications of cumulative dosing over time should be considered a reason to discontinue therapy.
The take-home message from this article is to create opportunities to periodically revisit the rationale for all of a patient’s prescriptions, and to make sure patients are comfortable knowing why they should keep taking each of their medications. While revisiting a patient’s prescriptions may indeed reduce the medication burden, I believe it also enhances adherence to the remaining prescribed medications. The medication reconciliation process requires more than simply checking off the box in the EMR to indicate that the medications were “reviewed.”
- Bjerre LM, Farrell B, Hogel M, et al. Deprescribing antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and insomnia: evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Physician 2018; 64(1):17–27.
- Bjerre LM, Farrell B, Hogel M, et al. Deprescribing antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and insomnia: evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Physician 2018; 64(1):17–27.
Correction: Update on VTE
In the article, “Update on the management of venous thromboembolism” (Bartholomew JR, Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[suppl 3]:39–46), 2 sentences in the text regarding dose reduction for body weight have errors. The corrected sentences follow:
On page 42, left column, the last 5 lines should read: “The recommended dose should be reduced to 2.5 mg twice daily in patients that meet 2 of the following criteria: age 80 or older; body weight of 60 kg or less; or with a serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or greater.”
And on page 42, right column, the sentence 10 lines from the top should read: “Edoxaban is given orally at 60 mg once daily but reduced to 30 mg once daily if the CrCL is 30 mL/min to 50 mL/min, if body weight is 60 kg or less, or with use of certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors.”
In the article, “Update on the management of venous thromboembolism” (Bartholomew JR, Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[suppl 3]:39–46), 2 sentences in the text regarding dose reduction for body weight have errors. The corrected sentences follow:
On page 42, left column, the last 5 lines should read: “The recommended dose should be reduced to 2.5 mg twice daily in patients that meet 2 of the following criteria: age 80 or older; body weight of 60 kg or less; or with a serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or greater.”
And on page 42, right column, the sentence 10 lines from the top should read: “Edoxaban is given orally at 60 mg once daily but reduced to 30 mg once daily if the CrCL is 30 mL/min to 50 mL/min, if body weight is 60 kg or less, or with use of certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors.”
In the article, “Update on the management of venous thromboembolism” (Bartholomew JR, Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84[suppl 3]:39–46), 2 sentences in the text regarding dose reduction for body weight have errors. The corrected sentences follow:
On page 42, left column, the last 5 lines should read: “The recommended dose should be reduced to 2.5 mg twice daily in patients that meet 2 of the following criteria: age 80 or older; body weight of 60 kg or less; or with a serum creatinine 1.5 mg/dL or greater.”
And on page 42, right column, the sentence 10 lines from the top should read: “Edoxaban is given orally at 60 mg once daily but reduced to 30 mg once daily if the CrCL is 30 mL/min to 50 mL/min, if body weight is 60 kg or less, or with use of certain P-glycoprotein inhibitors.”
Transient neurologic syndromes: A diagnostic approach
Many patients present to their primary care physicians, urgent care centers, and emergency rooms because of neurologic symptoms lasting seconds to hours. Their problems can be a cause for concern and a challenge to diagnose, as in many cases their symptoms have returned to baseline by the time of evaluation. Referral to a neurologist may not be practical for all of them, particularly given that a consultation may take a long time to obtain.
Understanding the causes of transient neurologic syndromes and their phenomenology may help the clinician diagnose, triage, and treat such conditions effectively.
Here, we outline several transient neurologic syndromes—transient ischemic attack (TIA), migraine with aura, partial seizures, hypoglycemic encephalopathy, hyperventilation syndrome, transient global amnesia, narcolepsy, parasomnias, and some rarer conditions— focusing on their diagnostic elements. Others, such as drug-induced transient neurologic syndromes, vertigo, and dizziness, have been well discussed elsewhere.1–3
THE BIG 3: TIA, MIGRAINE, SEIZURES
A 45-year-old woman with a history of tobacco use and headaches presents to the emergency department with a 4-month history of episodic numbness and tingling of her right arm and face. She reports a prodromal state of anxiety and irritability 24 to 48 hours before symptom onset.
The sensory symptoms begin on her face and gradually progress down the arm and eventually to her fingers. They fully resolve within 2 hours without sequelae. Family members have noted some “slurred speech” during the episodes, and the episodes are occasionally preceded by a unilateral, throbbing headache that improves with rest.
What are the possible causes of her symptoms?
Transient ischemic attack
If a patient reports transient neurologic symptoms and has vascular risk factors, TIA is often the default diagnostic consideration. The risk of stroke is 9.9% in the 2 days after a TIA, 13.4% at 30 days, and 17.3% at 90 days.4 Rapid recognition offers a crucial period to minimize the possibility of permanent impairment. Interventions include modifying risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and smoking) and starting an antiplatelet drug, an anticoagulant drug, or both, and possibly a statin.
It can be difficult to determine if this workup needs to be completed in the inpatient or outpatient setting. There is no clear consensus, but the ultimate goal is timely evaluation (within 24 to 48 hours). The ABCD2 (Age, Blood pressure, Clinical features, Duration of symptoms, and Diabetes) risk factor calculator was developed to help triage patients, though it has limitations.5,6
One should assess a patient’s history of a possible TIA in a stepwise fashion. First, analyze the patient’s age and demographics for known vascular risk factors or central embolic sources (eg, atrial fibrillation). Then consider the symptoms. TIA symptoms have rapid onset, usually within seconds7; symptoms with a more gradual crescendo suggest a nonvascular cause.8 TIA manifestations should resolve within 1 hour, and most studies suggest symptom resolution within 10 minutes is specific for a TIA.9–11 TIA symptoms are negative neurologic phenomena that denote a loss of function, such as loss of vision, motor weakness, or sensory numbness.
Symptoms should also correlate with a defined vascular territory:
- The middle cerebral artery is commonly involved; its blockage is associated with aphasia, weakness of the face and arm, and homonymous visual field impairment (loss of one-half of the visual fields in both eyes)
- Blockage in the posterior circulation generally causes symptoms localized to the brainstem, cerebellum, and occipital cortex. The symptoms are usually grouped together as the “5Ds”: dizziness, diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, and dystaxia/ataxia. Brainstem involvement classically produces “crossed” findings, with ipsilateral cranial findings and contralateral motor or sensory findings.
- Lacunar strokes involve the subcortical white matter and produce typical patterns including pure motor or sensory syndromes.
Loss of consciousness is rarely a symptom of TIA and should suggest another etiology.
The definition of TIA has evolved from an operational one, ie, symptoms lasting less than 24 hours, to a tissue-based one, ie, focal cerebral ischemia not associated with permanent cerebral infarction.12 Though imperfect, this pathophysiology should help reinforce the most common features of TIA, including a sudden onset of negative symptoms that are localized to a defined vascular territory.13,14
Migraine with aura
Migraine with aura is common in patients ages 25 to 55 who have a long-standing history of headache. The pathophysiologic mechanism of an aura is believed to be a disseminating wave of cortical depression, which is a self-propagating wave of neural depression and then activation. Ultimately, this leads to a cascade of inflammatory and pain signals, resulting in a headache.
This background helps explain the positive (superimposed) symptoms associated with the aura. Positive symptoms are produced by excessive neuronal discharges stimulating the visual (flashing lights, zigzag lines), sensory (paresthesias), or motor (limb movements) pathways.
Common symptoms associated with aura include visual disturbances such as scintillating scotoma (a blind spot), sensory changes such as tingling, or auditory disruption with tinnitus. Symptoms may evolve over the course of 5 to 20 minutes, first affecting vision and then other senses. In contrast, in a TIA, symptoms usually begin simultaneously and are confined to a vascular territory.7,15 Symptoms of an aura usually resolve within an hour, but there is evidence showing a substantial number of patients have an aura lasting much longer.16 Focal weakness is uncommon during an aura but is reported in specific migraine conditions such as hemiplegic migraine and migraine with unilateral motor symptoms. The vast majority of patients experience other neurologic symptoms during this prodrome.17,18
The prodromal period (2 to 48 hours leading up to the onset of migraine) is a commonly overlooked feature of migraine.19 Common symptoms during this time include fatigue, mood change, and gastrointestinal symptoms.20 One study demonstrated that patients generally had good intuition concerning these nonspecific prodromal symptoms and could predict the onset of migraine 72% of the time.21
In addition, a myriad of possible triggers and exacerbating factors can be identified (and sometimes avoided) such as visual stimuli, weather changes, nitrates, sleep disturbances, menstruation, foods, and stressors.22
Although headache is often the cardinal manifestation of migraine, some patients experience aura without headache—acephalgic migraine.23 This can be a diagnostic challenge, especially in an older population with multiple vascular risk factors. New-onset acephalgic migraine may be a cause for concern but is not uncommon and is not associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke.24 Focusing on the character of the neurologic symptoms in regard to timing, progression, and resolution will help differentiate this disease from other transient neurologic syndromes.25
Partial seizure
Partial seizure produces a diverse range of stereotypical symptoms due to focal abnormal neuronal activation. The aberrant electrical firing generates positive symptoms involving the motor, sensory, or visual pathway. A history of trauma, neurosurgical intervention, central nervous system infection, stroke, or other seizure foci can suggest this diagnosis. Other prodromal clues include abdominal discomfort, sense of detachment, déjà vu, or jamais vu.26
During a seizure, there may be a progression of positive symptoms similar to what happens in migraine aura, because both represent cortical spread and depression.
Involvement of the motor pathway may produce tonic (stiffening) or clonic (twitching) movement. Other common motor abnormalities include automatisms such as lip smacking, chewing, and hand gestures (picking, fidgeting, fumbling).27
Epileptic discharges in the sensory cortex commonly cause paresthesias or distortion of a sensory input. Visual symptoms may be more complex. In occipital epilepsy, circular phenomena with a colored pattern are common, which contrasts with the photopsia (flashes of light) or fortification (a bright zigzag of lines resembling a fort) seen in migraines.28
Autonomic or somatosensory symptoms can also occur.
Todd paralysis, also called transient postictal paralysis, occurs in only 13% of seizures but can linger for 0.5 to 36 hours.29,30 This weakness is most pronounced within the affected region after a partial seizure.
In general, focal seizures are often stereotyped with positive neurologic features, usually last a few minutes, and resolve fully. These episodes may cause an arrest in activity but not usually loss of consciousness unless the epileptic discharge secondarily generalizes into the adjacent hemisphere.
A common differential diagnosis encountered during an epilepsy workup is psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Nonepileptic seizures consist of transient, abnormal movements, sensation, or cognition but lack ictal electroencephalographic changes. This is a specifically challenging patient population, with high healthcare utilization and high risk for iatrogenic harm. In addition, on average, diagnosis can take years to establish and usually requires referral to a tertiary care facility.31,32
The big 3: Back to our patient
Our patient’s vascular risk factors, transient symptoms, and language involvement support the diagnosis of TIA. A feature that points away from the diagnosis of TIA is the gradual onset of positive neurologic symptoms. This pattern is not consistent with neuronal ischemia.
Also, our patient had a repetitive, stereotypical pattern of symptoms, which supports including partial seizures in the differential diagnosis. On the other hand, her lack of risk factors for seizure (a history of febrile seizures, developmental delay, trauma, or infection) would make this diagnosis less likely. Also pointing away from the diagnosis of seizures are her lack of typical prodromal symptoms, the length of the events, and the postevent headache.
Table 1 summarizes the clinical findings associated with TIA, migraine, and partial seizure.
EPISODES OF CONFUSION
A 35-year-old woman with a history of depression, anxiety, and poorly controlled type 1 diabetes presents to the clinic after several weeks of episodes of confusion, usually accompanied by paresthesias in both hands, dizziness, and palpitations. In each episode, soon after the symptoms began, she had painful cramps in her hand. The symptoms fully resolved within 10 minutes without sequelae.
Questioned further, the patient describes the confusion as a “mental haze” but denies frank disorientation. She has not kept a log of her blood sugar levels but has not noticed a temporal relationship with regard to her meals or insulin injections.
What are the possible causes of these episodes?
Hypoglycemic encephalopathy
Hypoglycemia is common in most people with diabetes, who have been reported to suffer from 62 to 320 severe hypoglycemic episodes in their lifetime.33,34 The neurologic consequences can be devastating in these severe cases.
During mild to moderate drops in the glucose level, generalized symptoms stem from sympathetic activation. These include generalized anxiety, tremor, palpitations, and sweating. Focal symptoms such as unilateral weakness have also been reported.35,36
Unfortunately, people with long-standing diabetes have a blunted response to epinephrine that reduces their sensitivity to hypoglycemia, placing them at high risk of permanent neurologic damage. This can lead to seizures and coma, as the hypoglycemia has a greater effect on cortical and subcortical structures (highly metabolic areas) than on the brainstem. Thus, respiratory and cardiovascular function is maintained but cerebral function is abnormal. If this state is prolonged, brain death can occur.37,38
Hyperventilation syndrome
Hyperventilation syndrome is not well characterized. Most think of it as synonymous with an underlying psychopathology, but there is evidence to suggest it can occur without underlying anxiety.
There is no clear mechanism, but it is hypothesized that diminished carbon dioxide levels lead to cerebral vasoconstriction. This may lead to reduced cerebral blood flow, causing dizziness, lightheadedness, or vertigo.39 Appendicular symptoms including paresthesias, carpopedal spasm, or tetany have been core features since the syndrome was first described in the early 1900s.40
Though the disorder has rather nonspecific features, it can be easily reproduced in the clinical setting by asking the patient to breathe deeply and rapidly. This can help confirm the underlying diagnosis and also reassure the patient that the underlying pathology is not life-threatening and that he or she has some control over the disease.
Transient global amnesia
Transient global amnesia usually strikes older patients (50 to 70 years old) in the setting of an acute physical or emotional stressor. There is also a correlation between transient global amnesia and migraine, with studies showing migraineurs are at higher risk than the general population.41 Despite common clinical concerns, there is no relationship between transient global amnesia and stroke.42
Transient global amnesia is defined by acute transient anterograde amnesia (coding of new memories). To try to reorient themselves, patients will repeatedly ask questions such as “What day is it?” or “Why are we here?” Retrograde memories, especially long-standing ones, are usually well preserved. The patient’s cognition is otherwise intact, and there are no other focal neurologic symptoms. The event usually lasts 2 to 24 hours and resolves without sequelae.43,44 Afterward, patients remember the event only poorly, which supports the notion that they cannot code new memories.
Confusional episodes: Discussion
Evaluating confusional episodes can be time-consuming and vexing. The subjective nature of the symptoms and the vast differential diagnosis can be overwhelming. Subtle clinical details can help formulate an appropriate evaluation.
Hypoglycemia can produce bizarre neurologic symptoms. Most cases of hypoglycemia produce an exaggerated sympathetic response, though this is blunted in people with longstanding diabetes. In addition, there should be a temporal association with meals, insulin doses, or both.
Transient global amnesia usually occurs with acute stressors and produces a confusional state. These episodes rarely recur, and the patient cannot provide much history regarding the episode secondary to the anterograde amnesia.
Table 2 summarizes the clinical findings associated with hypoglycemic encephalopathy, hyperventilation syndrome, and transient global amnesia.
Back to our patient
In our patient, the likely diagnosis is hyperventilation syndrome, even though we don’t know if her respiratory rate is increased during attacks. Some patients lack awareness of their breathing or are too distracted by the vague symptoms to have insight into the true cause. The cramps and contractions in the hands are a specific feature of the disease and can be accompanied by confusion.
SLEEP DISORDERS
A 17-year-old boy with a history of depression and anxiety presents to his pediatrician because he has had difficulty staying awake in school over the past year. His sleepiness has gradually worsened over the last few months and has taken a toll on his grades, leading to discord in his family. Over the past month he has had some difficulty holding his head up during arguments with friends. He does not lose consciousness during these events but is described as “unresponsive.” He describes vivid dreams when going to sleep that have startled him awake at times. His family history is positive for somnambulism on his father’s side.
Does this patient have a sleep disorder, and if so, which one?
Narcolepsy
Narcolepsy is defined by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucination, and sleep paralysis. It is more common in men but its prevalence varies widely by geographic region, supporting an underlying interplay between genetics and environment.45
Sleep attacks or excessive daytime sleepiness are the cardinal features of narcolepsy. The dissociation between the sleep-wake cycle is evident with rapid transition into rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep during these sleep attacks. This results in a “refreshing nap” that commonly involves vivid dreams. These episodes occur about 3 to 5 times per day, varying in duration from a few minutes to hours.46
Cataplexy is very specific feature of narcolepsy. Triggered by strong emotion, the body loses skeletal muscle tone except for the diaphragm and ocular muscles. The patient does not lose consciousness and remains aware of his or her environment. Of note, the loss of tone does not need to be dramatic. The hypotonia can manifest as jaw-dropping or head-nodding. The paralysis is related to prolonged REM atonia and impaired transition from sleep to wakefulness.47 Hypnagogic hallucination and sleep paralysis can occur, together with vivid visual hallucinations.
Parasomnias: Somnambulism and night terrors
Most non-REM parasomnias occur in childhood and diminish in adulthood. Two of the most common disorders are sleepwalking (somnambulism) and night terrors. Both are characterized by arousal from slow-wave sleep and are commonly associated with sedating medication, sleep deprivation, or psychopathology.
In somnambulism, patients exhibit complex motor behavior without interaction with their environment. Most have little recollection of the event.48 Sleep terrors produce a more intense reaction. The patient erupts out of sleep with profound terror, confusion, and autonomic changes. Interestingly, the patient can normally fall right back into sleep after the event.49–51
Back to our patient
Excessive daytime sleepiness and generalized fatigue are commonly encountered in outpatients. They can be frustrating because in many cases, no clear etiology can be discovered.52
This patient has several risk factors for parasomnias. His history of anxiety and depression in the setting of recent stressors sets the stage for night terrors. In addition, like many patients with parasomnias, he has a family history of sleep disorders. His vivid dreams make night terrors possible, but without the stark sympathetic activation it is a less likely diagnosis. It also does not account for the other symptoms he describes.
Our patient’s excessive daytime sleepiness interfering with daily activities, cataplexy, and hypnagogic hallucinations support the diagnosis of narcolepsy. This case highlights the variable weakness experienced during a cataplexy attack. It can range from a simple head droop to complete paralysis. Subtle findings require specific probing by the clinician. Patients with narcolepsy typically present in their late teens to early adulthood, but the cataplexy attacks may develop later in the disease course.
Table 3 summarizes the clinical findings associated with night terrors, somnambulism, and narcolepsy.
RARE CAUSES OF TRANSIENT NEUROLOGIC SYMPTOMS
Transient (paroxysmal) neurologic events in multiple sclerosis
A less well-known phenomenon in multiple sclerosis is termed “transient” (paroxysmal) neurologic events. These are typically stereotyped episodes lasting seconds, occurring sometimes hundreds of times a day. They are thought to arise from spontaneous electrical activity in an area of demyelination (ephaptic transmission), creating a wide range of symptoms. Some common events include positive sensory symptoms, alteration of the motor system such as spasms, or brainstem symptoms.53
Channelopathy
Two prototypical channelopathies are hyperkalemic and hypokalemic periodic paralysis. They are rare conditions, usually inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern.54 Both produce episodic, flaccid weakness in the setting of activity or other stressors (fasting, pregnancy, an emotionally charged episode). The attacks last a few minutes to hours and affect proximal skeletal muscles, with very little respiratory or bulbar involvement.
Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis is also associated with myotonia, which is the inability to voluntarily relax after stimulation. This can be evident after shaking a patient’s hand, as he or she would be unable to release because of the sustained activation. The myotonia is evident between attacks and may help cue a physician to the diagnosis even if the weakness has abated.55
As the name implies, potassium levels can vary during the attack, though hyperkalemic periodic paralysis can be seen with normal levels of serum potassium. The underlying pathology is tied to a voltage-gated sodium channel or calcium channel necessary for action potential generation.56
Paroxysmal dyskinesias
Paroxysmal dyskinesias encompass a rare group of movement disorders characterized by attacks without alterations in consciousness. Patients have reported dystonic, choreoathetotic, or ballistic movements. The attacks can be triggered by stress, eating, or even other types of movements. Most reported cases have a strong family history and are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. The exact pathophysiology is unclear. When paroxysmal dyskinesia was initially discovered, many thought it was a form of epilepsy, but the lack of electroencephalographic changes and postictal events argues against this etiology.
Transient focal neurologic episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a degenerative condition in which amyloid is deposited in cerebral vessels, making them friable and at risk of bleeding. Most patients have no symptoms whatsoever, and the diagnosis is made by magnetic resonance imaging. Small microbleeds are common, but lobar intraparenchymal hemorrhage is the most feared complication.
Transient focal neurologic episodes, sometimes termed “amyloid spells,” are recurrent, stereotyped neurologic events that are spurred by cortical superficial siderosis (deposition of iron). Unfortunately, these events are difficult to characterize by their clinical morphology. The events can involve the visual, motor, and sensory pathways with both positive and negative symptoms, making the diagnosis difficult without imaging. These events may precede a symptomatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage, offering a unique window to reconsider the decision to continue an antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug.57,58
- Vuadens P, Regli F. Drug-induced neurological complications in a hospital cohort. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1995; 125:1625–1633. French.
- Hanley K, O’Dowd T, Considine N. A systematic review of vertigo in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51:666–671.
- Brignole M. Diagnosis and treatment of syncope. Heart 2007; 93:130–136.
- Giles MF, Rothwell PM. Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6:1063–1072.
- Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2007; 369:283–292.
- Wardlaw JM, Brazzelli M, Chappell FM, et al. ABCD2 score and secondary stroke prevention: meta-analysis and effect per 1,000 patients triaged. Neurology 2015; 85:373–380.
- Nadarajan V, Perry RJ, Johnson J, Werring DJ. Transient ischaemic attacks: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol 2014; 14:23–31.
- Prabhakaran S, Silver AJ, Warrior L, McClenathan B, Lee VH. Misdiagnosis of transient ischemic attacks in the emergency room. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26:630–635.
- Sorensen AG, Ay H. Transient ischemic attack: definition, diagnosis, and risk stratification. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2011; 21:303–313.
- Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yasaka M, Wada K, Yamaguchi T. The duration of symptoms in transient ischemic attack. Neurology 1999; 52:976–980.
- Lewandowski CA, Rao CP, Silver B. Transient ischemic attack: definitions and clinical presentations. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52:S7–S16.
- Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, et al; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009; 40:2276–2293.
- Bos MJ, van Rijn MJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Incidence and prognosis of transient neurological attacks. JAMA 2007; 298:2877–2885.
- van Rooij FG, Vermeer SE, Goraj BM, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in transient neurological attacks. Ann Neurol 2015; 78:1005–1010.
- Silberstein SD, Young WB. Migraine aura and prodrome. Semin Neurol 1995; 15:175–182.
- Viana M, Sprenger T, Andelova M, Goadsby PJ. The typical duration of migraine aura: a systematic review. Cephalalgia 2013; 33:483–490.
- Young WB, Gangal KS, Aponte RJ, Kaiser RS. Migraine with unilateral motor symptoms: a case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78:600–604.
- Thomsen LL, Eriksen MK, Roemer SF, Andersen I, Olesen J, Russell MB. A population-based study of familial hemiplegic migraine suggests revised diagnostic criteria. Brain 2002; 125:1379–1391.
- Buzzi MG, Cologno D, Formisano R, Rossi P. Prodromes and the early phase of the migraine attack: therapeutic relevance. Funct Neurol 2005; 20:179–183.
- Kelman L. The premonitory symptoms (prodrome): a tertiary care study of 893 migraineurs. Headache 2004; 44:865–872.
- Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology 2003; 60:935–940.
- Martin VT, Behbehani MM. Toward a rational understanding of migraine trigger factors. Med Clin North Am 2001; 85:911–941.
- Naeije G, Gaspard N, Legros B, Mavroudakis N, Pandolfo M. Transient CNS deficits and migrainous auras in individuals without a history of headache. Headache 2014; 54:493–499.
- Tuna MA, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM; Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Neuroscience Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University. Stroke risk after a first late–onset migraine–like transient neurological attack (TNA): Oxford vascular study TNA cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84:e2.
- Fisher CM. Late-life migraine accompaniments—further experience. Stroke 1986; 17:1033–1042.
- Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1990.
- Wyllie E, Rothner AD, Luders H. Partial seizures in children: clinical features, medical treatment, and surgical considerations. Pediatr Clin North Am 1989; 36:343–364.
- Panayiotopoulos CP. Visual phenomena and headache in occipital epilepsy: a review, a systematic study and differentiation from migraine. Epileptic Disord 1999; 1:205–216.
- Gallmetzer P, Leutmezer F, Serles W, Assem-Hilger E, Spatt J, Baumgartner C. Postictal paresis in focal epilepsies—incidence, duration, and causes: a video-EEG monitoring study. Neurology 2004; 62:2160–2164.
- Rolak LA, Rutecki P, Ashizawa T, Harati Y. Clinical features of Todd’s post-epileptic paralysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:63–64.
- Reuber M, Elger CE. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: review and update. Epilepsy Behav 2003; 4:205–216.
- LaFrance WC Jr, Baird GL, Barry JJ, et al; NES Treatment Trial (NEST-T) Consortium. Multicenter pilot treatment trial for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:997–1005.
- UK Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Risk of hypoglycaemia in types 1 and 2 diabetes: effects of treatment modalities and their duration. Diabetologia 2007; 50:1140–1147.
- Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, et al; Endocrine Society. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:709–728.
- Yoshino T, Meguro S, Soeda Y, Itoh A, Kawai T, Itoh H. A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review. Ups J Med Sci 2012; 117:347–351.
- Lee SH, Kang CD, Kim SS, et al. Lateralization of hypoglycemic encephalopathy: evidence of a mechanism of selective vulnerability. J Clin Neurol 2010; 6:104–108.
- Siegel GJ, Agranoff BW. Basic neurochemistry: molecular, cellular, and medical aspects. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
- Holstein A, Plaschke A, Egberts EH. Clinical characterisation of severe hypoglycaemia—a prospective population-based study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2003; 111:364–369.
- Raichle ME, Plum F. Hyperventilation and cerebral blood flow. Stroke 1972; 3:566–575.
- Kerr WJ, Gliebe PA, Dalton JW. Physical phenomena associated with anxiety states: the hyperventilation syndrome. Cal West Med 1938; 48:12–16.
- Lin KH, Chen YT, Fuh JL, et al. Migraine is associated with a higher risk of transient global amnesia: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21:718–724.
- Arena JE, Brown RD, Mandrekar J, Rabinstein AA. Long-term outcome in patients with transient global amnesia: a population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92:399–405.
- Arena JE, Rabinstein AA. Transient global amnesia. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90:264–272.
- Bartsch T, Butler C. Transient amnesic syndromes. Nat Rev Neurol 2013; 9:86–97.
- Scammell TE. Narcolepsy. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2654–2662.
- Ahmed I, Thorpy M. Clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of narcolepsy. Clin Chest Med 2010; 31:371–381.
- Leschziner G. Narcolepsy: a clinical review. Pract Neurol 2014; 14:323–331.
- Hughes JR. A review of sleepwalking (somnambulism): the enigma of neurophysiology and polysomnography with differential diagnosis of complex partial seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2007; 11:483–491.
- Gremmo M, Blanchi I, Costa B, et al. An abilitative approach to the premature infant in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). J Perinat Med 1994; 22(suppl 1):102–105.
- Howell MJ. Parasomnias: an updated review. Neurotherapeutics 2012; 9:753–775.
- Giglio P, Undevia N, Spire JP. The primary parasomnias. A review for neurologists. Neurologist 2005; 11:90–97.
- Viner R, Christie D. Fatigue and somatic symptoms. BMJ 2005; 330:1012–1015.
- Rae-Grant AD. Unusual symptoms and syndromes in multiple sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013; 19:992–1006.
- Fontaine B. Periodic paralysis. Adv Genet 2008; 63:3–23.
- Jurkat-Rott K, Lehmann-Horn F. Paroxysmal muscle weakness: the familial periodic paralyses. J Neurol 2006; 253:1391–1398.
- Lehmann-Horn F, Jurkat-Rott K, Rudel R. Periodic paralysis: understanding channelopathies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2002; 2:61–69.
- Katoh M, Yoshino M, Asaoka K, et al. A restricted subarachnoid hemorrhage in the cortical sulcus in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: could it be a warning sign? Surg Neurol 2007; 68:457–460.
- Charidimou A, Peeters A, Fox Z, et al. Spectrum of transient focal neurological episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: multicentre magnetic resonance imaging cohort study and meta-analysis. Stroke 2012; 43:2324–2330.
Many patients present to their primary care physicians, urgent care centers, and emergency rooms because of neurologic symptoms lasting seconds to hours. Their problems can be a cause for concern and a challenge to diagnose, as in many cases their symptoms have returned to baseline by the time of evaluation. Referral to a neurologist may not be practical for all of them, particularly given that a consultation may take a long time to obtain.
Understanding the causes of transient neurologic syndromes and their phenomenology may help the clinician diagnose, triage, and treat such conditions effectively.
Here, we outline several transient neurologic syndromes—transient ischemic attack (TIA), migraine with aura, partial seizures, hypoglycemic encephalopathy, hyperventilation syndrome, transient global amnesia, narcolepsy, parasomnias, and some rarer conditions— focusing on their diagnostic elements. Others, such as drug-induced transient neurologic syndromes, vertigo, and dizziness, have been well discussed elsewhere.1–3
THE BIG 3: TIA, MIGRAINE, SEIZURES
A 45-year-old woman with a history of tobacco use and headaches presents to the emergency department with a 4-month history of episodic numbness and tingling of her right arm and face. She reports a prodromal state of anxiety and irritability 24 to 48 hours before symptom onset.
The sensory symptoms begin on her face and gradually progress down the arm and eventually to her fingers. They fully resolve within 2 hours without sequelae. Family members have noted some “slurred speech” during the episodes, and the episodes are occasionally preceded by a unilateral, throbbing headache that improves with rest.
What are the possible causes of her symptoms?
Transient ischemic attack
If a patient reports transient neurologic symptoms and has vascular risk factors, TIA is often the default diagnostic consideration. The risk of stroke is 9.9% in the 2 days after a TIA, 13.4% at 30 days, and 17.3% at 90 days.4 Rapid recognition offers a crucial period to minimize the possibility of permanent impairment. Interventions include modifying risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and smoking) and starting an antiplatelet drug, an anticoagulant drug, or both, and possibly a statin.
It can be difficult to determine if this workup needs to be completed in the inpatient or outpatient setting. There is no clear consensus, but the ultimate goal is timely evaluation (within 24 to 48 hours). The ABCD2 (Age, Blood pressure, Clinical features, Duration of symptoms, and Diabetes) risk factor calculator was developed to help triage patients, though it has limitations.5,6
One should assess a patient’s history of a possible TIA in a stepwise fashion. First, analyze the patient’s age and demographics for known vascular risk factors or central embolic sources (eg, atrial fibrillation). Then consider the symptoms. TIA symptoms have rapid onset, usually within seconds7; symptoms with a more gradual crescendo suggest a nonvascular cause.8 TIA manifestations should resolve within 1 hour, and most studies suggest symptom resolution within 10 minutes is specific for a TIA.9–11 TIA symptoms are negative neurologic phenomena that denote a loss of function, such as loss of vision, motor weakness, or sensory numbness.
Symptoms should also correlate with a defined vascular territory:
- The middle cerebral artery is commonly involved; its blockage is associated with aphasia, weakness of the face and arm, and homonymous visual field impairment (loss of one-half of the visual fields in both eyes)
- Blockage in the posterior circulation generally causes symptoms localized to the brainstem, cerebellum, and occipital cortex. The symptoms are usually grouped together as the “5Ds”: dizziness, diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, and dystaxia/ataxia. Brainstem involvement classically produces “crossed” findings, with ipsilateral cranial findings and contralateral motor or sensory findings.
- Lacunar strokes involve the subcortical white matter and produce typical patterns including pure motor or sensory syndromes.
Loss of consciousness is rarely a symptom of TIA and should suggest another etiology.
The definition of TIA has evolved from an operational one, ie, symptoms lasting less than 24 hours, to a tissue-based one, ie, focal cerebral ischemia not associated with permanent cerebral infarction.12 Though imperfect, this pathophysiology should help reinforce the most common features of TIA, including a sudden onset of negative symptoms that are localized to a defined vascular territory.13,14
Migraine with aura
Migraine with aura is common in patients ages 25 to 55 who have a long-standing history of headache. The pathophysiologic mechanism of an aura is believed to be a disseminating wave of cortical depression, which is a self-propagating wave of neural depression and then activation. Ultimately, this leads to a cascade of inflammatory and pain signals, resulting in a headache.
This background helps explain the positive (superimposed) symptoms associated with the aura. Positive symptoms are produced by excessive neuronal discharges stimulating the visual (flashing lights, zigzag lines), sensory (paresthesias), or motor (limb movements) pathways.
Common symptoms associated with aura include visual disturbances such as scintillating scotoma (a blind spot), sensory changes such as tingling, or auditory disruption with tinnitus. Symptoms may evolve over the course of 5 to 20 minutes, first affecting vision and then other senses. In contrast, in a TIA, symptoms usually begin simultaneously and are confined to a vascular territory.7,15 Symptoms of an aura usually resolve within an hour, but there is evidence showing a substantial number of patients have an aura lasting much longer.16 Focal weakness is uncommon during an aura but is reported in specific migraine conditions such as hemiplegic migraine and migraine with unilateral motor symptoms. The vast majority of patients experience other neurologic symptoms during this prodrome.17,18
The prodromal period (2 to 48 hours leading up to the onset of migraine) is a commonly overlooked feature of migraine.19 Common symptoms during this time include fatigue, mood change, and gastrointestinal symptoms.20 One study demonstrated that patients generally had good intuition concerning these nonspecific prodromal symptoms and could predict the onset of migraine 72% of the time.21
In addition, a myriad of possible triggers and exacerbating factors can be identified (and sometimes avoided) such as visual stimuli, weather changes, nitrates, sleep disturbances, menstruation, foods, and stressors.22
Although headache is often the cardinal manifestation of migraine, some patients experience aura without headache—acephalgic migraine.23 This can be a diagnostic challenge, especially in an older population with multiple vascular risk factors. New-onset acephalgic migraine may be a cause for concern but is not uncommon and is not associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke.24 Focusing on the character of the neurologic symptoms in regard to timing, progression, and resolution will help differentiate this disease from other transient neurologic syndromes.25
Partial seizure
Partial seizure produces a diverse range of stereotypical symptoms due to focal abnormal neuronal activation. The aberrant electrical firing generates positive symptoms involving the motor, sensory, or visual pathway. A history of trauma, neurosurgical intervention, central nervous system infection, stroke, or other seizure foci can suggest this diagnosis. Other prodromal clues include abdominal discomfort, sense of detachment, déjà vu, or jamais vu.26
During a seizure, there may be a progression of positive symptoms similar to what happens in migraine aura, because both represent cortical spread and depression.
Involvement of the motor pathway may produce tonic (stiffening) or clonic (twitching) movement. Other common motor abnormalities include automatisms such as lip smacking, chewing, and hand gestures (picking, fidgeting, fumbling).27
Epileptic discharges in the sensory cortex commonly cause paresthesias or distortion of a sensory input. Visual symptoms may be more complex. In occipital epilepsy, circular phenomena with a colored pattern are common, which contrasts with the photopsia (flashes of light) or fortification (a bright zigzag of lines resembling a fort) seen in migraines.28
Autonomic or somatosensory symptoms can also occur.
Todd paralysis, also called transient postictal paralysis, occurs in only 13% of seizures but can linger for 0.5 to 36 hours.29,30 This weakness is most pronounced within the affected region after a partial seizure.
In general, focal seizures are often stereotyped with positive neurologic features, usually last a few minutes, and resolve fully. These episodes may cause an arrest in activity but not usually loss of consciousness unless the epileptic discharge secondarily generalizes into the adjacent hemisphere.
A common differential diagnosis encountered during an epilepsy workup is psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Nonepileptic seizures consist of transient, abnormal movements, sensation, or cognition but lack ictal electroencephalographic changes. This is a specifically challenging patient population, with high healthcare utilization and high risk for iatrogenic harm. In addition, on average, diagnosis can take years to establish and usually requires referral to a tertiary care facility.31,32
The big 3: Back to our patient
Our patient’s vascular risk factors, transient symptoms, and language involvement support the diagnosis of TIA. A feature that points away from the diagnosis of TIA is the gradual onset of positive neurologic symptoms. This pattern is not consistent with neuronal ischemia.
Also, our patient had a repetitive, stereotypical pattern of symptoms, which supports including partial seizures in the differential diagnosis. On the other hand, her lack of risk factors for seizure (a history of febrile seizures, developmental delay, trauma, or infection) would make this diagnosis less likely. Also pointing away from the diagnosis of seizures are her lack of typical prodromal symptoms, the length of the events, and the postevent headache.
Table 1 summarizes the clinical findings associated with TIA, migraine, and partial seizure.
EPISODES OF CONFUSION
A 35-year-old woman with a history of depression, anxiety, and poorly controlled type 1 diabetes presents to the clinic after several weeks of episodes of confusion, usually accompanied by paresthesias in both hands, dizziness, and palpitations. In each episode, soon after the symptoms began, she had painful cramps in her hand. The symptoms fully resolved within 10 minutes without sequelae.
Questioned further, the patient describes the confusion as a “mental haze” but denies frank disorientation. She has not kept a log of her blood sugar levels but has not noticed a temporal relationship with regard to her meals or insulin injections.
What are the possible causes of these episodes?
Hypoglycemic encephalopathy
Hypoglycemia is common in most people with diabetes, who have been reported to suffer from 62 to 320 severe hypoglycemic episodes in their lifetime.33,34 The neurologic consequences can be devastating in these severe cases.
During mild to moderate drops in the glucose level, generalized symptoms stem from sympathetic activation. These include generalized anxiety, tremor, palpitations, and sweating. Focal symptoms such as unilateral weakness have also been reported.35,36
Unfortunately, people with long-standing diabetes have a blunted response to epinephrine that reduces their sensitivity to hypoglycemia, placing them at high risk of permanent neurologic damage. This can lead to seizures and coma, as the hypoglycemia has a greater effect on cortical and subcortical structures (highly metabolic areas) than on the brainstem. Thus, respiratory and cardiovascular function is maintained but cerebral function is abnormal. If this state is prolonged, brain death can occur.37,38
Hyperventilation syndrome
Hyperventilation syndrome is not well characterized. Most think of it as synonymous with an underlying psychopathology, but there is evidence to suggest it can occur without underlying anxiety.
There is no clear mechanism, but it is hypothesized that diminished carbon dioxide levels lead to cerebral vasoconstriction. This may lead to reduced cerebral blood flow, causing dizziness, lightheadedness, or vertigo.39 Appendicular symptoms including paresthesias, carpopedal spasm, or tetany have been core features since the syndrome was first described in the early 1900s.40
Though the disorder has rather nonspecific features, it can be easily reproduced in the clinical setting by asking the patient to breathe deeply and rapidly. This can help confirm the underlying diagnosis and also reassure the patient that the underlying pathology is not life-threatening and that he or she has some control over the disease.
Transient global amnesia
Transient global amnesia usually strikes older patients (50 to 70 years old) in the setting of an acute physical or emotional stressor. There is also a correlation between transient global amnesia and migraine, with studies showing migraineurs are at higher risk than the general population.41 Despite common clinical concerns, there is no relationship between transient global amnesia and stroke.42
Transient global amnesia is defined by acute transient anterograde amnesia (coding of new memories). To try to reorient themselves, patients will repeatedly ask questions such as “What day is it?” or “Why are we here?” Retrograde memories, especially long-standing ones, are usually well preserved. The patient’s cognition is otherwise intact, and there are no other focal neurologic symptoms. The event usually lasts 2 to 24 hours and resolves without sequelae.43,44 Afterward, patients remember the event only poorly, which supports the notion that they cannot code new memories.
Confusional episodes: Discussion
Evaluating confusional episodes can be time-consuming and vexing. The subjective nature of the symptoms and the vast differential diagnosis can be overwhelming. Subtle clinical details can help formulate an appropriate evaluation.
Hypoglycemia can produce bizarre neurologic symptoms. Most cases of hypoglycemia produce an exaggerated sympathetic response, though this is blunted in people with longstanding diabetes. In addition, there should be a temporal association with meals, insulin doses, or both.
Transient global amnesia usually occurs with acute stressors and produces a confusional state. These episodes rarely recur, and the patient cannot provide much history regarding the episode secondary to the anterograde amnesia.
Table 2 summarizes the clinical findings associated with hypoglycemic encephalopathy, hyperventilation syndrome, and transient global amnesia.
Back to our patient
In our patient, the likely diagnosis is hyperventilation syndrome, even though we don’t know if her respiratory rate is increased during attacks. Some patients lack awareness of their breathing or are too distracted by the vague symptoms to have insight into the true cause. The cramps and contractions in the hands are a specific feature of the disease and can be accompanied by confusion.
SLEEP DISORDERS
A 17-year-old boy with a history of depression and anxiety presents to his pediatrician because he has had difficulty staying awake in school over the past year. His sleepiness has gradually worsened over the last few months and has taken a toll on his grades, leading to discord in his family. Over the past month he has had some difficulty holding his head up during arguments with friends. He does not lose consciousness during these events but is described as “unresponsive.” He describes vivid dreams when going to sleep that have startled him awake at times. His family history is positive for somnambulism on his father’s side.
Does this patient have a sleep disorder, and if so, which one?
Narcolepsy
Narcolepsy is defined by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucination, and sleep paralysis. It is more common in men but its prevalence varies widely by geographic region, supporting an underlying interplay between genetics and environment.45
Sleep attacks or excessive daytime sleepiness are the cardinal features of narcolepsy. The dissociation between the sleep-wake cycle is evident with rapid transition into rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep during these sleep attacks. This results in a “refreshing nap” that commonly involves vivid dreams. These episodes occur about 3 to 5 times per day, varying in duration from a few minutes to hours.46
Cataplexy is very specific feature of narcolepsy. Triggered by strong emotion, the body loses skeletal muscle tone except for the diaphragm and ocular muscles. The patient does not lose consciousness and remains aware of his or her environment. Of note, the loss of tone does not need to be dramatic. The hypotonia can manifest as jaw-dropping or head-nodding. The paralysis is related to prolonged REM atonia and impaired transition from sleep to wakefulness.47 Hypnagogic hallucination and sleep paralysis can occur, together with vivid visual hallucinations.
Parasomnias: Somnambulism and night terrors
Most non-REM parasomnias occur in childhood and diminish in adulthood. Two of the most common disorders are sleepwalking (somnambulism) and night terrors. Both are characterized by arousal from slow-wave sleep and are commonly associated with sedating medication, sleep deprivation, or psychopathology.
In somnambulism, patients exhibit complex motor behavior without interaction with their environment. Most have little recollection of the event.48 Sleep terrors produce a more intense reaction. The patient erupts out of sleep with profound terror, confusion, and autonomic changes. Interestingly, the patient can normally fall right back into sleep after the event.49–51
Back to our patient
Excessive daytime sleepiness and generalized fatigue are commonly encountered in outpatients. They can be frustrating because in many cases, no clear etiology can be discovered.52
This patient has several risk factors for parasomnias. His history of anxiety and depression in the setting of recent stressors sets the stage for night terrors. In addition, like many patients with parasomnias, he has a family history of sleep disorders. His vivid dreams make night terrors possible, but without the stark sympathetic activation it is a less likely diagnosis. It also does not account for the other symptoms he describes.
Our patient’s excessive daytime sleepiness interfering with daily activities, cataplexy, and hypnagogic hallucinations support the diagnosis of narcolepsy. This case highlights the variable weakness experienced during a cataplexy attack. It can range from a simple head droop to complete paralysis. Subtle findings require specific probing by the clinician. Patients with narcolepsy typically present in their late teens to early adulthood, but the cataplexy attacks may develop later in the disease course.
Table 3 summarizes the clinical findings associated with night terrors, somnambulism, and narcolepsy.
RARE CAUSES OF TRANSIENT NEUROLOGIC SYMPTOMS
Transient (paroxysmal) neurologic events in multiple sclerosis
A less well-known phenomenon in multiple sclerosis is termed “transient” (paroxysmal) neurologic events. These are typically stereotyped episodes lasting seconds, occurring sometimes hundreds of times a day. They are thought to arise from spontaneous electrical activity in an area of demyelination (ephaptic transmission), creating a wide range of symptoms. Some common events include positive sensory symptoms, alteration of the motor system such as spasms, or brainstem symptoms.53
Channelopathy
Two prototypical channelopathies are hyperkalemic and hypokalemic periodic paralysis. They are rare conditions, usually inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern.54 Both produce episodic, flaccid weakness in the setting of activity or other stressors (fasting, pregnancy, an emotionally charged episode). The attacks last a few minutes to hours and affect proximal skeletal muscles, with very little respiratory or bulbar involvement.
Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis is also associated with myotonia, which is the inability to voluntarily relax after stimulation. This can be evident after shaking a patient’s hand, as he or she would be unable to release because of the sustained activation. The myotonia is evident between attacks and may help cue a physician to the diagnosis even if the weakness has abated.55
As the name implies, potassium levels can vary during the attack, though hyperkalemic periodic paralysis can be seen with normal levels of serum potassium. The underlying pathology is tied to a voltage-gated sodium channel or calcium channel necessary for action potential generation.56
Paroxysmal dyskinesias
Paroxysmal dyskinesias encompass a rare group of movement disorders characterized by attacks without alterations in consciousness. Patients have reported dystonic, choreoathetotic, or ballistic movements. The attacks can be triggered by stress, eating, or even other types of movements. Most reported cases have a strong family history and are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. The exact pathophysiology is unclear. When paroxysmal dyskinesia was initially discovered, many thought it was a form of epilepsy, but the lack of electroencephalographic changes and postictal events argues against this etiology.
Transient focal neurologic episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a degenerative condition in which amyloid is deposited in cerebral vessels, making them friable and at risk of bleeding. Most patients have no symptoms whatsoever, and the diagnosis is made by magnetic resonance imaging. Small microbleeds are common, but lobar intraparenchymal hemorrhage is the most feared complication.
Transient focal neurologic episodes, sometimes termed “amyloid spells,” are recurrent, stereotyped neurologic events that are spurred by cortical superficial siderosis (deposition of iron). Unfortunately, these events are difficult to characterize by their clinical morphology. The events can involve the visual, motor, and sensory pathways with both positive and negative symptoms, making the diagnosis difficult without imaging. These events may precede a symptomatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage, offering a unique window to reconsider the decision to continue an antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug.57,58
Many patients present to their primary care physicians, urgent care centers, and emergency rooms because of neurologic symptoms lasting seconds to hours. Their problems can be a cause for concern and a challenge to diagnose, as in many cases their symptoms have returned to baseline by the time of evaluation. Referral to a neurologist may not be practical for all of them, particularly given that a consultation may take a long time to obtain.
Understanding the causes of transient neurologic syndromes and their phenomenology may help the clinician diagnose, triage, and treat such conditions effectively.
Here, we outline several transient neurologic syndromes—transient ischemic attack (TIA), migraine with aura, partial seizures, hypoglycemic encephalopathy, hyperventilation syndrome, transient global amnesia, narcolepsy, parasomnias, and some rarer conditions— focusing on their diagnostic elements. Others, such as drug-induced transient neurologic syndromes, vertigo, and dizziness, have been well discussed elsewhere.1–3
THE BIG 3: TIA, MIGRAINE, SEIZURES
A 45-year-old woman with a history of tobacco use and headaches presents to the emergency department with a 4-month history of episodic numbness and tingling of her right arm and face. She reports a prodromal state of anxiety and irritability 24 to 48 hours before symptom onset.
The sensory symptoms begin on her face and gradually progress down the arm and eventually to her fingers. They fully resolve within 2 hours without sequelae. Family members have noted some “slurred speech” during the episodes, and the episodes are occasionally preceded by a unilateral, throbbing headache that improves with rest.
What are the possible causes of her symptoms?
Transient ischemic attack
If a patient reports transient neurologic symptoms and has vascular risk factors, TIA is often the default diagnostic consideration. The risk of stroke is 9.9% in the 2 days after a TIA, 13.4% at 30 days, and 17.3% at 90 days.4 Rapid recognition offers a crucial period to minimize the possibility of permanent impairment. Interventions include modifying risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and smoking) and starting an antiplatelet drug, an anticoagulant drug, or both, and possibly a statin.
It can be difficult to determine if this workup needs to be completed in the inpatient or outpatient setting. There is no clear consensus, but the ultimate goal is timely evaluation (within 24 to 48 hours). The ABCD2 (Age, Blood pressure, Clinical features, Duration of symptoms, and Diabetes) risk factor calculator was developed to help triage patients, though it has limitations.5,6
One should assess a patient’s history of a possible TIA in a stepwise fashion. First, analyze the patient’s age and demographics for known vascular risk factors or central embolic sources (eg, atrial fibrillation). Then consider the symptoms. TIA symptoms have rapid onset, usually within seconds7; symptoms with a more gradual crescendo suggest a nonvascular cause.8 TIA manifestations should resolve within 1 hour, and most studies suggest symptom resolution within 10 minutes is specific for a TIA.9–11 TIA symptoms are negative neurologic phenomena that denote a loss of function, such as loss of vision, motor weakness, or sensory numbness.
Symptoms should also correlate with a defined vascular territory:
- The middle cerebral artery is commonly involved; its blockage is associated with aphasia, weakness of the face and arm, and homonymous visual field impairment (loss of one-half of the visual fields in both eyes)
- Blockage in the posterior circulation generally causes symptoms localized to the brainstem, cerebellum, and occipital cortex. The symptoms are usually grouped together as the “5Ds”: dizziness, diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, and dystaxia/ataxia. Brainstem involvement classically produces “crossed” findings, with ipsilateral cranial findings and contralateral motor or sensory findings.
- Lacunar strokes involve the subcortical white matter and produce typical patterns including pure motor or sensory syndromes.
Loss of consciousness is rarely a symptom of TIA and should suggest another etiology.
The definition of TIA has evolved from an operational one, ie, symptoms lasting less than 24 hours, to a tissue-based one, ie, focal cerebral ischemia not associated with permanent cerebral infarction.12 Though imperfect, this pathophysiology should help reinforce the most common features of TIA, including a sudden onset of negative symptoms that are localized to a defined vascular territory.13,14
Migraine with aura
Migraine with aura is common in patients ages 25 to 55 who have a long-standing history of headache. The pathophysiologic mechanism of an aura is believed to be a disseminating wave of cortical depression, which is a self-propagating wave of neural depression and then activation. Ultimately, this leads to a cascade of inflammatory and pain signals, resulting in a headache.
This background helps explain the positive (superimposed) symptoms associated with the aura. Positive symptoms are produced by excessive neuronal discharges stimulating the visual (flashing lights, zigzag lines), sensory (paresthesias), or motor (limb movements) pathways.
Common symptoms associated with aura include visual disturbances such as scintillating scotoma (a blind spot), sensory changes such as tingling, or auditory disruption with tinnitus. Symptoms may evolve over the course of 5 to 20 minutes, first affecting vision and then other senses. In contrast, in a TIA, symptoms usually begin simultaneously and are confined to a vascular territory.7,15 Symptoms of an aura usually resolve within an hour, but there is evidence showing a substantial number of patients have an aura lasting much longer.16 Focal weakness is uncommon during an aura but is reported in specific migraine conditions such as hemiplegic migraine and migraine with unilateral motor symptoms. The vast majority of patients experience other neurologic symptoms during this prodrome.17,18
The prodromal period (2 to 48 hours leading up to the onset of migraine) is a commonly overlooked feature of migraine.19 Common symptoms during this time include fatigue, mood change, and gastrointestinal symptoms.20 One study demonstrated that patients generally had good intuition concerning these nonspecific prodromal symptoms and could predict the onset of migraine 72% of the time.21
In addition, a myriad of possible triggers and exacerbating factors can be identified (and sometimes avoided) such as visual stimuli, weather changes, nitrates, sleep disturbances, menstruation, foods, and stressors.22
Although headache is often the cardinal manifestation of migraine, some patients experience aura without headache—acephalgic migraine.23 This can be a diagnostic challenge, especially in an older population with multiple vascular risk factors. New-onset acephalgic migraine may be a cause for concern but is not uncommon and is not associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke.24 Focusing on the character of the neurologic symptoms in regard to timing, progression, and resolution will help differentiate this disease from other transient neurologic syndromes.25
Partial seizure
Partial seizure produces a diverse range of stereotypical symptoms due to focal abnormal neuronal activation. The aberrant electrical firing generates positive symptoms involving the motor, sensory, or visual pathway. A history of trauma, neurosurgical intervention, central nervous system infection, stroke, or other seizure foci can suggest this diagnosis. Other prodromal clues include abdominal discomfort, sense of detachment, déjà vu, or jamais vu.26
During a seizure, there may be a progression of positive symptoms similar to what happens in migraine aura, because both represent cortical spread and depression.
Involvement of the motor pathway may produce tonic (stiffening) or clonic (twitching) movement. Other common motor abnormalities include automatisms such as lip smacking, chewing, and hand gestures (picking, fidgeting, fumbling).27
Epileptic discharges in the sensory cortex commonly cause paresthesias or distortion of a sensory input. Visual symptoms may be more complex. In occipital epilepsy, circular phenomena with a colored pattern are common, which contrasts with the photopsia (flashes of light) or fortification (a bright zigzag of lines resembling a fort) seen in migraines.28
Autonomic or somatosensory symptoms can also occur.
Todd paralysis, also called transient postictal paralysis, occurs in only 13% of seizures but can linger for 0.5 to 36 hours.29,30 This weakness is most pronounced within the affected region after a partial seizure.
In general, focal seizures are often stereotyped with positive neurologic features, usually last a few minutes, and resolve fully. These episodes may cause an arrest in activity but not usually loss of consciousness unless the epileptic discharge secondarily generalizes into the adjacent hemisphere.
A common differential diagnosis encountered during an epilepsy workup is psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Nonepileptic seizures consist of transient, abnormal movements, sensation, or cognition but lack ictal electroencephalographic changes. This is a specifically challenging patient population, with high healthcare utilization and high risk for iatrogenic harm. In addition, on average, diagnosis can take years to establish and usually requires referral to a tertiary care facility.31,32
The big 3: Back to our patient
Our patient’s vascular risk factors, transient symptoms, and language involvement support the diagnosis of TIA. A feature that points away from the diagnosis of TIA is the gradual onset of positive neurologic symptoms. This pattern is not consistent with neuronal ischemia.
Also, our patient had a repetitive, stereotypical pattern of symptoms, which supports including partial seizures in the differential diagnosis. On the other hand, her lack of risk factors for seizure (a history of febrile seizures, developmental delay, trauma, or infection) would make this diagnosis less likely. Also pointing away from the diagnosis of seizures are her lack of typical prodromal symptoms, the length of the events, and the postevent headache.
Table 1 summarizes the clinical findings associated with TIA, migraine, and partial seizure.
EPISODES OF CONFUSION
A 35-year-old woman with a history of depression, anxiety, and poorly controlled type 1 diabetes presents to the clinic after several weeks of episodes of confusion, usually accompanied by paresthesias in both hands, dizziness, and palpitations. In each episode, soon after the symptoms began, she had painful cramps in her hand. The symptoms fully resolved within 10 minutes without sequelae.
Questioned further, the patient describes the confusion as a “mental haze” but denies frank disorientation. She has not kept a log of her blood sugar levels but has not noticed a temporal relationship with regard to her meals or insulin injections.
What are the possible causes of these episodes?
Hypoglycemic encephalopathy
Hypoglycemia is common in most people with diabetes, who have been reported to suffer from 62 to 320 severe hypoglycemic episodes in their lifetime.33,34 The neurologic consequences can be devastating in these severe cases.
During mild to moderate drops in the glucose level, generalized symptoms stem from sympathetic activation. These include generalized anxiety, tremor, palpitations, and sweating. Focal symptoms such as unilateral weakness have also been reported.35,36
Unfortunately, people with long-standing diabetes have a blunted response to epinephrine that reduces their sensitivity to hypoglycemia, placing them at high risk of permanent neurologic damage. This can lead to seizures and coma, as the hypoglycemia has a greater effect on cortical and subcortical structures (highly metabolic areas) than on the brainstem. Thus, respiratory and cardiovascular function is maintained but cerebral function is abnormal. If this state is prolonged, brain death can occur.37,38
Hyperventilation syndrome
Hyperventilation syndrome is not well characterized. Most think of it as synonymous with an underlying psychopathology, but there is evidence to suggest it can occur without underlying anxiety.
There is no clear mechanism, but it is hypothesized that diminished carbon dioxide levels lead to cerebral vasoconstriction. This may lead to reduced cerebral blood flow, causing dizziness, lightheadedness, or vertigo.39 Appendicular symptoms including paresthesias, carpopedal spasm, or tetany have been core features since the syndrome was first described in the early 1900s.40
Though the disorder has rather nonspecific features, it can be easily reproduced in the clinical setting by asking the patient to breathe deeply and rapidly. This can help confirm the underlying diagnosis and also reassure the patient that the underlying pathology is not life-threatening and that he or she has some control over the disease.
Transient global amnesia
Transient global amnesia usually strikes older patients (50 to 70 years old) in the setting of an acute physical or emotional stressor. There is also a correlation between transient global amnesia and migraine, with studies showing migraineurs are at higher risk than the general population.41 Despite common clinical concerns, there is no relationship between transient global amnesia and stroke.42
Transient global amnesia is defined by acute transient anterograde amnesia (coding of new memories). To try to reorient themselves, patients will repeatedly ask questions such as “What day is it?” or “Why are we here?” Retrograde memories, especially long-standing ones, are usually well preserved. The patient’s cognition is otherwise intact, and there are no other focal neurologic symptoms. The event usually lasts 2 to 24 hours and resolves without sequelae.43,44 Afterward, patients remember the event only poorly, which supports the notion that they cannot code new memories.
Confusional episodes: Discussion
Evaluating confusional episodes can be time-consuming and vexing. The subjective nature of the symptoms and the vast differential diagnosis can be overwhelming. Subtle clinical details can help formulate an appropriate evaluation.
Hypoglycemia can produce bizarre neurologic symptoms. Most cases of hypoglycemia produce an exaggerated sympathetic response, though this is blunted in people with longstanding diabetes. In addition, there should be a temporal association with meals, insulin doses, or both.
Transient global amnesia usually occurs with acute stressors and produces a confusional state. These episodes rarely recur, and the patient cannot provide much history regarding the episode secondary to the anterograde amnesia.
Table 2 summarizes the clinical findings associated with hypoglycemic encephalopathy, hyperventilation syndrome, and transient global amnesia.
Back to our patient
In our patient, the likely diagnosis is hyperventilation syndrome, even though we don’t know if her respiratory rate is increased during attacks. Some patients lack awareness of their breathing or are too distracted by the vague symptoms to have insight into the true cause. The cramps and contractions in the hands are a specific feature of the disease and can be accompanied by confusion.
SLEEP DISORDERS
A 17-year-old boy with a history of depression and anxiety presents to his pediatrician because he has had difficulty staying awake in school over the past year. His sleepiness has gradually worsened over the last few months and has taken a toll on his grades, leading to discord in his family. Over the past month he has had some difficulty holding his head up during arguments with friends. He does not lose consciousness during these events but is described as “unresponsive.” He describes vivid dreams when going to sleep that have startled him awake at times. His family history is positive for somnambulism on his father’s side.
Does this patient have a sleep disorder, and if so, which one?
Narcolepsy
Narcolepsy is defined by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucination, and sleep paralysis. It is more common in men but its prevalence varies widely by geographic region, supporting an underlying interplay between genetics and environment.45
Sleep attacks or excessive daytime sleepiness are the cardinal features of narcolepsy. The dissociation between the sleep-wake cycle is evident with rapid transition into rapid-eye-movement (REM) sleep during these sleep attacks. This results in a “refreshing nap” that commonly involves vivid dreams. These episodes occur about 3 to 5 times per day, varying in duration from a few minutes to hours.46
Cataplexy is very specific feature of narcolepsy. Triggered by strong emotion, the body loses skeletal muscle tone except for the diaphragm and ocular muscles. The patient does not lose consciousness and remains aware of his or her environment. Of note, the loss of tone does not need to be dramatic. The hypotonia can manifest as jaw-dropping or head-nodding. The paralysis is related to prolonged REM atonia and impaired transition from sleep to wakefulness.47 Hypnagogic hallucination and sleep paralysis can occur, together with vivid visual hallucinations.
Parasomnias: Somnambulism and night terrors
Most non-REM parasomnias occur in childhood and diminish in adulthood. Two of the most common disorders are sleepwalking (somnambulism) and night terrors. Both are characterized by arousal from slow-wave sleep and are commonly associated with sedating medication, sleep deprivation, or psychopathology.
In somnambulism, patients exhibit complex motor behavior without interaction with their environment. Most have little recollection of the event.48 Sleep terrors produce a more intense reaction. The patient erupts out of sleep with profound terror, confusion, and autonomic changes. Interestingly, the patient can normally fall right back into sleep after the event.49–51
Back to our patient
Excessive daytime sleepiness and generalized fatigue are commonly encountered in outpatients. They can be frustrating because in many cases, no clear etiology can be discovered.52
This patient has several risk factors for parasomnias. His history of anxiety and depression in the setting of recent stressors sets the stage for night terrors. In addition, like many patients with parasomnias, he has a family history of sleep disorders. His vivid dreams make night terrors possible, but without the stark sympathetic activation it is a less likely diagnosis. It also does not account for the other symptoms he describes.
Our patient’s excessive daytime sleepiness interfering with daily activities, cataplexy, and hypnagogic hallucinations support the diagnosis of narcolepsy. This case highlights the variable weakness experienced during a cataplexy attack. It can range from a simple head droop to complete paralysis. Subtle findings require specific probing by the clinician. Patients with narcolepsy typically present in their late teens to early adulthood, but the cataplexy attacks may develop later in the disease course.
Table 3 summarizes the clinical findings associated with night terrors, somnambulism, and narcolepsy.
RARE CAUSES OF TRANSIENT NEUROLOGIC SYMPTOMS
Transient (paroxysmal) neurologic events in multiple sclerosis
A less well-known phenomenon in multiple sclerosis is termed “transient” (paroxysmal) neurologic events. These are typically stereotyped episodes lasting seconds, occurring sometimes hundreds of times a day. They are thought to arise from spontaneous electrical activity in an area of demyelination (ephaptic transmission), creating a wide range of symptoms. Some common events include positive sensory symptoms, alteration of the motor system such as spasms, or brainstem symptoms.53
Channelopathy
Two prototypical channelopathies are hyperkalemic and hypokalemic periodic paralysis. They are rare conditions, usually inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern.54 Both produce episodic, flaccid weakness in the setting of activity or other stressors (fasting, pregnancy, an emotionally charged episode). The attacks last a few minutes to hours and affect proximal skeletal muscles, with very little respiratory or bulbar involvement.
Hyperkalemic periodic paralysis is also associated with myotonia, which is the inability to voluntarily relax after stimulation. This can be evident after shaking a patient’s hand, as he or she would be unable to release because of the sustained activation. The myotonia is evident between attacks and may help cue a physician to the diagnosis even if the weakness has abated.55
As the name implies, potassium levels can vary during the attack, though hyperkalemic periodic paralysis can be seen with normal levels of serum potassium. The underlying pathology is tied to a voltage-gated sodium channel or calcium channel necessary for action potential generation.56
Paroxysmal dyskinesias
Paroxysmal dyskinesias encompass a rare group of movement disorders characterized by attacks without alterations in consciousness. Patients have reported dystonic, choreoathetotic, or ballistic movements. The attacks can be triggered by stress, eating, or even other types of movements. Most reported cases have a strong family history and are inherited in an autosomal dominant pattern. The exact pathophysiology is unclear. When paroxysmal dyskinesia was initially discovered, many thought it was a form of epilepsy, but the lack of electroencephalographic changes and postictal events argues against this etiology.
Transient focal neurologic episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a degenerative condition in which amyloid is deposited in cerebral vessels, making them friable and at risk of bleeding. Most patients have no symptoms whatsoever, and the diagnosis is made by magnetic resonance imaging. Small microbleeds are common, but lobar intraparenchymal hemorrhage is the most feared complication.
Transient focal neurologic episodes, sometimes termed “amyloid spells,” are recurrent, stereotyped neurologic events that are spurred by cortical superficial siderosis (deposition of iron). Unfortunately, these events are difficult to characterize by their clinical morphology. The events can involve the visual, motor, and sensory pathways with both positive and negative symptoms, making the diagnosis difficult without imaging. These events may precede a symptomatic intraparenchymal hemorrhage, offering a unique window to reconsider the decision to continue an antiplatelet or anticoagulant drug.57,58
- Vuadens P, Regli F. Drug-induced neurological complications in a hospital cohort. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1995; 125:1625–1633. French.
- Hanley K, O’Dowd T, Considine N. A systematic review of vertigo in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51:666–671.
- Brignole M. Diagnosis and treatment of syncope. Heart 2007; 93:130–136.
- Giles MF, Rothwell PM. Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6:1063–1072.
- Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2007; 369:283–292.
- Wardlaw JM, Brazzelli M, Chappell FM, et al. ABCD2 score and secondary stroke prevention: meta-analysis and effect per 1,000 patients triaged. Neurology 2015; 85:373–380.
- Nadarajan V, Perry RJ, Johnson J, Werring DJ. Transient ischaemic attacks: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol 2014; 14:23–31.
- Prabhakaran S, Silver AJ, Warrior L, McClenathan B, Lee VH. Misdiagnosis of transient ischemic attacks in the emergency room. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26:630–635.
- Sorensen AG, Ay H. Transient ischemic attack: definition, diagnosis, and risk stratification. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2011; 21:303–313.
- Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yasaka M, Wada K, Yamaguchi T. The duration of symptoms in transient ischemic attack. Neurology 1999; 52:976–980.
- Lewandowski CA, Rao CP, Silver B. Transient ischemic attack: definitions and clinical presentations. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52:S7–S16.
- Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, et al; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009; 40:2276–2293.
- Bos MJ, van Rijn MJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Incidence and prognosis of transient neurological attacks. JAMA 2007; 298:2877–2885.
- van Rooij FG, Vermeer SE, Goraj BM, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in transient neurological attacks. Ann Neurol 2015; 78:1005–1010.
- Silberstein SD, Young WB. Migraine aura and prodrome. Semin Neurol 1995; 15:175–182.
- Viana M, Sprenger T, Andelova M, Goadsby PJ. The typical duration of migraine aura: a systematic review. Cephalalgia 2013; 33:483–490.
- Young WB, Gangal KS, Aponte RJ, Kaiser RS. Migraine with unilateral motor symptoms: a case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78:600–604.
- Thomsen LL, Eriksen MK, Roemer SF, Andersen I, Olesen J, Russell MB. A population-based study of familial hemiplegic migraine suggests revised diagnostic criteria. Brain 2002; 125:1379–1391.
- Buzzi MG, Cologno D, Formisano R, Rossi P. Prodromes and the early phase of the migraine attack: therapeutic relevance. Funct Neurol 2005; 20:179–183.
- Kelman L. The premonitory symptoms (prodrome): a tertiary care study of 893 migraineurs. Headache 2004; 44:865–872.
- Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology 2003; 60:935–940.
- Martin VT, Behbehani MM. Toward a rational understanding of migraine trigger factors. Med Clin North Am 2001; 85:911–941.
- Naeije G, Gaspard N, Legros B, Mavroudakis N, Pandolfo M. Transient CNS deficits and migrainous auras in individuals without a history of headache. Headache 2014; 54:493–499.
- Tuna MA, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM; Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Neuroscience Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University. Stroke risk after a first late–onset migraine–like transient neurological attack (TNA): Oxford vascular study TNA cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84:e2.
- Fisher CM. Late-life migraine accompaniments—further experience. Stroke 1986; 17:1033–1042.
- Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1990.
- Wyllie E, Rothner AD, Luders H. Partial seizures in children: clinical features, medical treatment, and surgical considerations. Pediatr Clin North Am 1989; 36:343–364.
- Panayiotopoulos CP. Visual phenomena and headache in occipital epilepsy: a review, a systematic study and differentiation from migraine. Epileptic Disord 1999; 1:205–216.
- Gallmetzer P, Leutmezer F, Serles W, Assem-Hilger E, Spatt J, Baumgartner C. Postictal paresis in focal epilepsies—incidence, duration, and causes: a video-EEG monitoring study. Neurology 2004; 62:2160–2164.
- Rolak LA, Rutecki P, Ashizawa T, Harati Y. Clinical features of Todd’s post-epileptic paralysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:63–64.
- Reuber M, Elger CE. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: review and update. Epilepsy Behav 2003; 4:205–216.
- LaFrance WC Jr, Baird GL, Barry JJ, et al; NES Treatment Trial (NEST-T) Consortium. Multicenter pilot treatment trial for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:997–1005.
- UK Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Risk of hypoglycaemia in types 1 and 2 diabetes: effects of treatment modalities and their duration. Diabetologia 2007; 50:1140–1147.
- Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, et al; Endocrine Society. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:709–728.
- Yoshino T, Meguro S, Soeda Y, Itoh A, Kawai T, Itoh H. A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review. Ups J Med Sci 2012; 117:347–351.
- Lee SH, Kang CD, Kim SS, et al. Lateralization of hypoglycemic encephalopathy: evidence of a mechanism of selective vulnerability. J Clin Neurol 2010; 6:104–108.
- Siegel GJ, Agranoff BW. Basic neurochemistry: molecular, cellular, and medical aspects. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
- Holstein A, Plaschke A, Egberts EH. Clinical characterisation of severe hypoglycaemia—a prospective population-based study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2003; 111:364–369.
- Raichle ME, Plum F. Hyperventilation and cerebral blood flow. Stroke 1972; 3:566–575.
- Kerr WJ, Gliebe PA, Dalton JW. Physical phenomena associated with anxiety states: the hyperventilation syndrome. Cal West Med 1938; 48:12–16.
- Lin KH, Chen YT, Fuh JL, et al. Migraine is associated with a higher risk of transient global amnesia: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21:718–724.
- Arena JE, Brown RD, Mandrekar J, Rabinstein AA. Long-term outcome in patients with transient global amnesia: a population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92:399–405.
- Arena JE, Rabinstein AA. Transient global amnesia. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90:264–272.
- Bartsch T, Butler C. Transient amnesic syndromes. Nat Rev Neurol 2013; 9:86–97.
- Scammell TE. Narcolepsy. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2654–2662.
- Ahmed I, Thorpy M. Clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of narcolepsy. Clin Chest Med 2010; 31:371–381.
- Leschziner G. Narcolepsy: a clinical review. Pract Neurol 2014; 14:323–331.
- Hughes JR. A review of sleepwalking (somnambulism): the enigma of neurophysiology and polysomnography with differential diagnosis of complex partial seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2007; 11:483–491.
- Gremmo M, Blanchi I, Costa B, et al. An abilitative approach to the premature infant in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). J Perinat Med 1994; 22(suppl 1):102–105.
- Howell MJ. Parasomnias: an updated review. Neurotherapeutics 2012; 9:753–775.
- Giglio P, Undevia N, Spire JP. The primary parasomnias. A review for neurologists. Neurologist 2005; 11:90–97.
- Viner R, Christie D. Fatigue and somatic symptoms. BMJ 2005; 330:1012–1015.
- Rae-Grant AD. Unusual symptoms and syndromes in multiple sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013; 19:992–1006.
- Fontaine B. Periodic paralysis. Adv Genet 2008; 63:3–23.
- Jurkat-Rott K, Lehmann-Horn F. Paroxysmal muscle weakness: the familial periodic paralyses. J Neurol 2006; 253:1391–1398.
- Lehmann-Horn F, Jurkat-Rott K, Rudel R. Periodic paralysis: understanding channelopathies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2002; 2:61–69.
- Katoh M, Yoshino M, Asaoka K, et al. A restricted subarachnoid hemorrhage in the cortical sulcus in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: could it be a warning sign? Surg Neurol 2007; 68:457–460.
- Charidimou A, Peeters A, Fox Z, et al. Spectrum of transient focal neurological episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: multicentre magnetic resonance imaging cohort study and meta-analysis. Stroke 2012; 43:2324–2330.
- Vuadens P, Regli F. Drug-induced neurological complications in a hospital cohort. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1995; 125:1625–1633. French.
- Hanley K, O’Dowd T, Considine N. A systematic review of vertigo in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51:666–671.
- Brignole M. Diagnosis and treatment of syncope. Heart 2007; 93:130–136.
- Giles MF, Rothwell PM. Risk of stroke early after transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6:1063–1072.
- Johnston SC, Rothwell PM, Nguyen-Huynh MN, et al. Validation and refinement of scores to predict very early stroke risk after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2007; 369:283–292.
- Wardlaw JM, Brazzelli M, Chappell FM, et al. ABCD2 score and secondary stroke prevention: meta-analysis and effect per 1,000 patients triaged. Neurology 2015; 85:373–380.
- Nadarajan V, Perry RJ, Johnson J, Werring DJ. Transient ischaemic attacks: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol 2014; 14:23–31.
- Prabhakaran S, Silver AJ, Warrior L, McClenathan B, Lee VH. Misdiagnosis of transient ischemic attacks in the emergency room. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 26:630–635.
- Sorensen AG, Ay H. Transient ischemic attack: definition, diagnosis, and risk stratification. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2011; 21:303–313.
- Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yasaka M, Wada K, Yamaguchi T. The duration of symptoms in transient ischemic attack. Neurology 1999; 52:976–980.
- Lewandowski CA, Rao CP, Silver B. Transient ischemic attack: definitions and clinical presentations. Ann Emerg Med 2008; 52:S7–S16.
- Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, et al; American Heart Association; American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009; 40:2276–2293.
- Bos MJ, van Rijn MJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Incidence and prognosis of transient neurological attacks. JAMA 2007; 298:2877–2885.
- van Rooij FG, Vermeer SE, Goraj BM, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in transient neurological attacks. Ann Neurol 2015; 78:1005–1010.
- Silberstein SD, Young WB. Migraine aura and prodrome. Semin Neurol 1995; 15:175–182.
- Viana M, Sprenger T, Andelova M, Goadsby PJ. The typical duration of migraine aura: a systematic review. Cephalalgia 2013; 33:483–490.
- Young WB, Gangal KS, Aponte RJ, Kaiser RS. Migraine with unilateral motor symptoms: a case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007; 78:600–604.
- Thomsen LL, Eriksen MK, Roemer SF, Andersen I, Olesen J, Russell MB. A population-based study of familial hemiplegic migraine suggests revised diagnostic criteria. Brain 2002; 125:1379–1391.
- Buzzi MG, Cologno D, Formisano R, Rossi P. Prodromes and the early phase of the migraine attack: therapeutic relevance. Funct Neurol 2005; 20:179–183.
- Kelman L. The premonitory symptoms (prodrome): a tertiary care study of 893 migraineurs. Headache 2004; 44:865–872.
- Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology 2003; 60:935–940.
- Martin VT, Behbehani MM. Toward a rational understanding of migraine trigger factors. Med Clin North Am 2001; 85:911–941.
- Naeije G, Gaspard N, Legros B, Mavroudakis N, Pandolfo M. Transient CNS deficits and migrainous auras in individuals without a history of headache. Headache 2014; 54:493–499.
- Tuna MA, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM; Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Neuroscience Department, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University. Stroke risk after a first late–onset migraine–like transient neurological attack (TNA): Oxford vascular study TNA cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84:e2.
- Fisher CM. Late-life migraine accompaniments—further experience. Stroke 1986; 17:1033–1042.
- Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW. Clinical methods: the history, physical, and laboratory examinations. 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworths; 1990.
- Wyllie E, Rothner AD, Luders H. Partial seizures in children: clinical features, medical treatment, and surgical considerations. Pediatr Clin North Am 1989; 36:343–364.
- Panayiotopoulos CP. Visual phenomena and headache in occipital epilepsy: a review, a systematic study and differentiation from migraine. Epileptic Disord 1999; 1:205–216.
- Gallmetzer P, Leutmezer F, Serles W, Assem-Hilger E, Spatt J, Baumgartner C. Postictal paresis in focal epilepsies—incidence, duration, and causes: a video-EEG monitoring study. Neurology 2004; 62:2160–2164.
- Rolak LA, Rutecki P, Ashizawa T, Harati Y. Clinical features of Todd’s post-epileptic paralysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992; 55:63–64.
- Reuber M, Elger CE. Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: review and update. Epilepsy Behav 2003; 4:205–216.
- LaFrance WC Jr, Baird GL, Barry JJ, et al; NES Treatment Trial (NEST-T) Consortium. Multicenter pilot treatment trial for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71:997–1005.
- UK Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Risk of hypoglycaemia in types 1 and 2 diabetes: effects of treatment modalities and their duration. Diabetologia 2007; 50:1140–1147.
- Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, et al; Endocrine Society. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94:709–728.
- Yoshino T, Meguro S, Soeda Y, Itoh A, Kawai T, Itoh H. A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review. Ups J Med Sci 2012; 117:347–351.
- Lee SH, Kang CD, Kim SS, et al. Lateralization of hypoglycemic encephalopathy: evidence of a mechanism of selective vulnerability. J Clin Neurol 2010; 6:104–108.
- Siegel GJ, Agranoff BW. Basic neurochemistry: molecular, cellular, and medical aspects. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
- Holstein A, Plaschke A, Egberts EH. Clinical characterisation of severe hypoglycaemia—a prospective population-based study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2003; 111:364–369.
- Raichle ME, Plum F. Hyperventilation and cerebral blood flow. Stroke 1972; 3:566–575.
- Kerr WJ, Gliebe PA, Dalton JW. Physical phenomena associated with anxiety states: the hyperventilation syndrome. Cal West Med 1938; 48:12–16.
- Lin KH, Chen YT, Fuh JL, et al. Migraine is associated with a higher risk of transient global amnesia: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2014; 21:718–724.
- Arena JE, Brown RD, Mandrekar J, Rabinstein AA. Long-term outcome in patients with transient global amnesia: a population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92:399–405.
- Arena JE, Rabinstein AA. Transient global amnesia. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90:264–272.
- Bartsch T, Butler C. Transient amnesic syndromes. Nat Rev Neurol 2013; 9:86–97.
- Scammell TE. Narcolepsy. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:2654–2662.
- Ahmed I, Thorpy M. Clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of narcolepsy. Clin Chest Med 2010; 31:371–381.
- Leschziner G. Narcolepsy: a clinical review. Pract Neurol 2014; 14:323–331.
- Hughes JR. A review of sleepwalking (somnambulism): the enigma of neurophysiology and polysomnography with differential diagnosis of complex partial seizures. Epilepsy Behav 2007; 11:483–491.
- Gremmo M, Blanchi I, Costa B, et al. An abilitative approach to the premature infant in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). J Perinat Med 1994; 22(suppl 1):102–105.
- Howell MJ. Parasomnias: an updated review. Neurotherapeutics 2012; 9:753–775.
- Giglio P, Undevia N, Spire JP. The primary parasomnias. A review for neurologists. Neurologist 2005; 11:90–97.
- Viner R, Christie D. Fatigue and somatic symptoms. BMJ 2005; 330:1012–1015.
- Rae-Grant AD. Unusual symptoms and syndromes in multiple sclerosis. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2013; 19:992–1006.
- Fontaine B. Periodic paralysis. Adv Genet 2008; 63:3–23.
- Jurkat-Rott K, Lehmann-Horn F. Paroxysmal muscle weakness: the familial periodic paralyses. J Neurol 2006; 253:1391–1398.
- Lehmann-Horn F, Jurkat-Rott K, Rudel R. Periodic paralysis: understanding channelopathies. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2002; 2:61–69.
- Katoh M, Yoshino M, Asaoka K, et al. A restricted subarachnoid hemorrhage in the cortical sulcus in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: could it be a warning sign? Surg Neurol 2007; 68:457–460.
- Charidimou A, Peeters A, Fox Z, et al. Spectrum of transient focal neurological episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: multicentre magnetic resonance imaging cohort study and meta-analysis. Stroke 2012; 43:2324–2330.
KEY POINTS
- Transient ischemic attack, migraine aura, and partial seizures are common and often can be differentiated by their distinctive symptoms.
- Episodes of confusion in a patient with diabetes raise the possibility of hypoglycemic encephalopathy; other possibilities include hyperventilation syndrome and transient global amnesia.
- Daytime sleepiness in a young patient may be due to narcolepsy or parasomnias.
Kidney transplant: New opportunities and challenges
Much has improved in renal transplantation over the past 20 years. The focus has shifted to using stronger immunotherapy rather than trying to minimize it. There has been increasing recognition of infection and ways to prevent and treat it. Induction therapy now has greater emphasis so that maintenance therapy can be eased, with the aim of reducing long-term toxicity. Perhaps the biggest change is the practice of screening for donor-specific antibodies at the time of transplant so that predictable problems can be prevented or better handled if they occur. Such advances have helped patients directly and by extending the life of their transplanted organs.
LONGER SURVIVAL
As early as the 1990s, it was recognized that kidney transplant offers a survival advantage for patients with end-stage renal disease over maintenance on dialysis.1 Although the risk of death is higher immediately after transplant, within a few months it becomes much lower than for patients on dialysis. Survival varies according to the health of the patient and the quality of the transplanted organ.
In general, patients who obtain the greatest benefit from transplants in terms of years of life gained are those with diabetes, especially those who are younger. Those ages 20 to 39 live about 8 years on dialysis vs 25 years after transplant.
CONTRAINDICATIONS TO TRANSPLANT
There are multiple contraindications to a solitary kidney transplant (Table 1), including smoking. Most transplant centers require that smokers quit before transplant. Long-standing smokers almost double their risk of a cardiac event after transplant and double their rate of malignancy. Active smoking at the time of transplant is associated with twice the risk of death by 10 years after transplant compared with that of nonsmokers.2 Cotinine testing can detect whether a patient is an active smoker.
WAITING-LIST CONSIDERATIONS
Organs are scarce
The number of patients on the kidney waiting list has increased rapidly in the last few decades, while the number of transplants performed each year has remained about the same. In 2016, about 100,000 patients were on the list, but only about 19,000 transplants were performed.3 Wait times, especially for deceased-donor organs, have increased to about 6 years, varying by blood type and geographic region.
Waiting-list placement
Placement on the waiting list for a deceased-donor kidney transplant occurs when a patient has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 or less, although referral to the list can be made earlier. Early listing remains advantageous, as total time on the list will be counted before starting dialysis. “Preemptive transplant” means the patient had no dialysis before transplant; this applies to about 10% of transplant recipients. These patients tend to fare the best and are usually recipients of a living-donor organ.
Most patients do not receive a transplant until the GFR is less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Since 2014, wait time has been measured from the beginning of dialysis rather than the date of waiting-list placement in patients who are listed after starting dialysis therapy. This approach is more fair but sometimes introduces problems. A patient who did not previously know about the list may suddenly jump to the head of the line after 10 years of dialysis, by which time comorbidities associated with long-term dialysis make the patient less likely to gain as much benefit from a transplant as people lower on the list. Time on dialysis, or “dialysis vintage,” predicts patient and kidney survival after transplant, with reduced survival associated with increasing time on dialysis.4
Shorter wait for a suboptimal kidney
The aging population has increased the number of older patients being listed for transplant, presenting multiple challenges. Patients age 65 or older have a 50% chance of dying before they receive a transplant during a 5-year wait.
A patient may shorten the wait by joining the list for a suboptimal organ. All deceased-donor organs are given a Kidney Donor Profile Index score, which predicts the longevity of an organ after transplant. The score is determined by donor age, kidney function based on the serum creatinine at the time of death, and other donor factors.
A kidney with a score higher than 85% is likely to function longer than only 15% of available kidneys. Patients who receive a kidney with that score have a longer period of risk of death soon after transplant and a slightly higher risk of death in the long term than patients who receive a healthier kidney, although on average they still do better than patients on dialysis.5
Older patients should be encouraged to sign up for both the regular waiting list and the suboptimal kidney waiting list to reduce the risk of dying before they get a kidney.
LIVING-DONOR ORGAN TRANSPLANT
Many advantages
Living-donor organ transplant is associated with a better survival rate than deceased-donor organ transplant, and the advantage becomes greater over time. At 1 year, patient survival is more than 90% in both groups, but by 5 years about 80% of patients with a living-donor organ are still alive vs only about 65% of patients with a deceased-donor organ.
The waiting time for a living-donor transplant may be only weeks to months, rather than years. Because increasing time on dialysis predicts worse patient and graft survival after transplant, the shorter wait time is a big advantage. In addition, because the donor and recipient are typically in adjacent operating rooms, the organ sustains less ischemic damage. In general, the kidney quality is better from healthy donors, resulting in superior function early on and longer graft survival by an average of 4 years. If the living donor is related to the recipient, human leukocyte antigen matching also tends to be better and predicts better outcomes.
Special challenges
Opting for a living-donor organ also entails special challenges. In addition to the ethical issues surrounding living-donor organ donation, an appropriate donor must be found. Donors must be highly motivated and pass physical, laboratory, and psychological evaluations.
For older patients, if the donor is a spouse or close friend, he or she is also likely to be older, making the organ less viable than one from a younger person. Even an adult child may not be an ideal donor if there is a family propensity to kidney disease, such as diabetic nephropathy. No test is available to determine the risk for future diabetes, but it is known to run in families.
POTENT IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
Induction therapy
Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab provides intense immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection during the early posttransplant period.
Antithymocyte globulin is a potent agent that contains antibodies directed at T cells, B cells, neutrophils, platelets, adhesion molecules, and complement. It binds T cells and removes them from circulation by opsonization in splenic and lymphoid tissue. The immunosuppressive effect is sustained for at least 2 to 3 months after a series of injections (dosage 1.5 mg/kg/day, usually for 4 to 10 doses). Antithymocyte globulin is also used to treat acute rejection, especially high-grade rejection for which steroid therapy is likely to be insufficient.
Basiliximab consists of antibodies to the interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor of T cells. Binding to T cells prevents their activation rather than removing them from circulation. The drug prevents rejection, with 30% relative reduction in early studies compared with placebo. However, it is ineffective in reversing established rejection. Dosage is 20 mg at day 0 and day 4, which provides receptor saturation for 30 to 45 days.
Basiliximab is also sometimes used off-label for patients who need to discontinue a calcineurin inhibitor (ie, tacrolimus or cyclosporine). In such cases, normal therapy is put on hold while basiliximab is given for 1 or 2 doses. Case series have been reported for this use, particularly for patients with a heart and liver transplant who develop acute kidney injury while hospitalized.6,7
Antithymocyte globulin is more effective but also more risky. Brennan et al8 randomized 278 transplant recipients to either antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab. Patients in the antithymocyte globulin group had a 16% rejection rate vs 26% in the basiliximab group.
Antithymocyte globulin therapy is associated with multiple adverse effects, including fever and chills, pulmonary edema, and long-standing immunosuppressive effects such as increased risk of lymphoma and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Basiliximab side-effect profiles are similar to those of placebo.
Maintenance therapy
The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus remain the standard of care in kidney transplant despite multiple drug interactions and side effects that include renal toxicity and fibrosis. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus both bind intracellular immunophilins and thereby prevent transcription of IL-2 and production of T cells. The drugs work similarly but have different binding sites. Cyclosporine has largely been replaced by tacrolimus because its reliability of dosing and higher potency are associated with lower rejection rates.
Tacrolimus is typically given twice daily (1–6 mg/dose). Twelve-hour trough levels are followed (target: 8–12 ng/mL early on, then 5–8 ng/mL after 3 months posttransplant). Side effects include hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, but less so than with cyclosporine. On the other hand, hyperglycemia tends to be worse with tacrolimus than with cyclosporine, and combining tacrolimus with steroids frequently leads to diabetes. Tacrolimus can also cause acute and chronic renal failure, especially at high drug levels, as well as neurotoxicity, tremors, and hair loss.
Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus (not a calcineurin inhibitor) are metabolized through the same cytochrome P450 pathway (CYP3A4), so they have common drug interactions (Table 2).
Mycophenolate mofetil is typically used as an adjunct therapy (500–1,000 mg twice daily). It is also used for other kidney diseases before transplant, including lupus nephritis. Transplanted kidney rejection rates with mycophenolate mofetil with steroids are about 40%, so the drug is not potent enough to be used without a calcineurin inhibitor.
Side effects include gastrointestinal toxicity in up to 20% of patients, and leukopenia, which is associated with viral infections.
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE IS COMMON WITH DIALYSIS
Coronary artery disease is highly associated with end-stage kidney disease and occurs in as many as 85% of older patients with diabetes on dialysis. Although patients with end-stage kidney disease tend to have more numerous and severe atherosclerotic lesions compared with the general population, justifying aggressive management, cardiac care tends to be conservative in patients on dialysis.9
Death from acute myocardial infarction occurs in about 20% to 30% of patients on dialysis vs about 2% of patients with normal renal function. Five years after myocardial infarction, survival is only about 30% in patients on dialysis.9
There are many explanations for excess coronary artery disease in patients on dialysis. In addition to the traditional cardiovascular risk factors of diabetes, hypertension, and preexisting coronary artery disease, patients are in a proinflammatory uremic state and have high levels of phosphorus and fibroblast growth factor 23 that contribute to vascular calcification. Almost all patients have high homocysteine levels and hemodynamic instability, particularly if they are on hemodialysis.
Pretransplant evaluation for heart disease
Patients on the kidney transplant waiting list are screened aggressively for heart disease. A history of myocardial infarction usually results in removal from the list. All patients have an initial electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Thallium or echocardiographic stress testing is used for patients who are age 50 and older, have diabetes, or have had dialysis for many years. Patients with evidence of ischemia undergo catheterization.
Patients are also screened with computed tomography before transplant. Because the kidney is typically anastomosed to the iliac artery and vein, heavy calcification of the iliac artery can make the procedure too difficult to perform.
Reduced long-term risk of myocardial infarction after transplant
Kasiske et al10 analyzed data from more than 50,000 patients from the US Renal Data System and found that, for about the first year after transplant, patients who underwent kidney transplant were more likely to have a myocardial infarction than those on dialysis. After that, they fared better than patients who remained on dialysis. Those with a living-donor transplant were less likely at all times to have a myocardial infarction than those with a deceased-donor transplant. By 3 years after transplant, the relative risk of having a myocardial infarction was 0.89 for deceased-donor organ recipients and 0.69 for living-donor recipients compared with patients on the waiting list.10
INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN KIDNEY RECIPIENTS
Kidney recipients are prone to many common and uncommon infections (Table 3). All potential recipients are tested pretransplant for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, and tuberculosis. A positive result does not necessarily rule out transplant.
The following viral serology tests are also done before transplant:
Epstein-Barr virus (antibodies are positive in about 90% of adults)
CMV (about 70% of adults are seropositive)
Varicella zoster (seronegative patients should be given live-attenuated varicella vaccine).
Risk of transmission of these viruses relates to the serostatus of the donor and recipient before transplant. If a donor is positive for viral antibodies but the recipient is not (a so-called “mismatch”), risk is higher after transplant.
Hepatitis C
Patients with hepatitis C fare better if they get a transplant than if they remain on dialysis, although their posttransplant course is worse compared with transplant patients who do not have hepatitis. Some patients develop accelerated liver disease after kidney transplant. Hepatitis C-related kidney disease—membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis—also occurs, as do comorbidities such as diabetes.
Careful evaluation is warranted before transplant, including liver imaging, alpha-fetoprotein testing, and liver biopsy to evaluate for hepatocellular carcinoma. A patient with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis may not be a candidate for kidney transplant alone but could possibly receive a combined kidney and liver transplant.
There is a need to determine the best time to treat hepatitis C infection. Patients with advanced liver disease or hepatitis C-related kidney disease would likely benefit from early treatment. However, delaying treatment could shorten the wait time for a deceased-donor organ positive for hepatitis C. Transplant candidates with active hepatitis C are uniquely considered to accept hepatitis C-positive kidneys, which are often discarded, and may only wait weeks for such a transplant. The shortened kidney survival associated with a hepatitis C-positive kidney may no longer be true with the new antiviral hepatitis C therapy, which has been shown to be effective post-transplant.
Hepatitis B
No cure is available for hepatitis B infection, but it can be well controlled with antiviral therapy. Patients with hepatitis B infection may be candidates for transplant, but they should be stable on antiviral therapy (lamivudine, entecavir, or tenofovir) to eliminate the viral load before transplant, and therapy should be continued afterward. Liver imaging, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and biopsy are recommended for evaluation. All hepatitis B- negative patients should be vaccinated before transplant.
Organs from living or deceased donors that test positive for hepatitis B core antibody, indicating prior exposure, can be considered for transplant in a patient who tests positive for hepatitis B surface antibody, indicating successful vaccination or prior exposure in the recipient. But donors must have negative surface antigen and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests that indicate no active hepatitis B infection.
Cytomegalovirus
CMV typically does not appear until prophylactic therapy is stopped. Classic symptoms are fever, leukopenia, and diarrhea. Infection can involve any organ, and patients may present with hepatitis, pancreatitis or, less commonly, pneumonitis.
Patients who are negative for CMV before transplant and receive a donor-positive organ are at the highest risk. Patients who are CMV IgG-positive are considered to be at intermediate risk, regardless of the donor status. Patients who are negative for CMV and receive a donor-negative organ are at the lowest risk and do not need prophylaxis with valganciclovir.
CMV infection is diagnosed by PCR testing of the blood or immunostaining in tissue biopsy. Occasionally, blood testing is negative in the face of tissue-based disease.
BK virus
BK is a polyoma virus and a common virus associated with kidney transplant. Viremia is seen in about 18% of patients, whereas actual kidney disease associated with a higher level of virus is seen in fewer than 10% of patients. Most people are exposed to BK virus, often in childhood, and it can remain indolent in the bladder and uroepithelium.
Patients can develop BK nephropathy after exposure to transplant immunosuppression.11 Posttransplant monitoring protocols typically include PCR testing for BK virus at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. No agent has been identified to specifically treat BK virus. The general strategy is to minimize immunosuppressive therapy by reducing or eliminating mycophenolate mofetil. Fortunately, BK virus does not tend to recur, and patients can have a low-level viremia (< 10,000 copies/mL) persisting over months or even years but often without clinical consequences.
The appearance of BK virus on biopsy can mimic acute rejection. Before BK viral nephropathy was a recognized entity, patients would have been diagnosed with acute rejection and may have been put on high-dose steroids, which would have worsened the BK infection.
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is most often associated with Epstein-Barr virus and usually involves a large, diffuse B-cell lymphoma. Burkitt lymphoma and plasma cell neoplasms also can occur less commonly.
The condition is about 30 times more common in patients after transplant than in the general population, and it is the third most common malignancy in transplant patients after skin and cervical cancers. About 80% of the cases occur early after transplant, within the first year.
Patients typically have a marked elevation in viral load of Epstein-Barr virus, although a negative viral load does not rule it out. A patient who is serologically negative for Epstein-Barr virus receiving a donor-positive kidney is at highest risk; this situation is most often seen in the pediatric population. Potent induction therapies (eg, antilymphocyte antibody therapy) are also associated with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.
Patients typically present with fever of unknown origin with no localizing signs or symptoms. Mass lesions can be challenging to find; positron emission tomography may be helpful. The culprit is usually a focal mass, ulcer (especially in the gastrointestinal tract), or infiltrate (commonly localized to the allograft). Multifocal or disseminated disease can also occur, including lymphoma or with central nervous system, gastrointestinal, or pulmonary involvement.
Biopsy of the affected site is required for histopathology and Epstein-Barr virus markers. PCR blood testing is often positive for Epstein-Barr virus.
Typical antiviral therapy does not eliminate Epstein-Barr virus. In early polyclonal viral proliferation, the first goal is to reduce immunosuppressive therapy. Rituximab alone may also help in polymorphic cases. With disease that is clearly monomorphic and has transformed to a true malignancy, cytotoxic chemotherapy is also required. “R-CHOP,” a combination therapy consisting of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, is usually used. Radiation therapy may help in some cases.
Cryptococcal infection
Previously seen in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, cryptococcal infection is now most commonly encountered in patients with solid-organ transplants. Vilchez et al12 found a 1% incidence in a series of more than 5,000 patients who had received an organ transplant.
Immunosuppression likely conveys risk, but because cryptococcal infection is acquired, environmental exposure also plays a role. It tends to appear more than 6 months after transplant, indicating that its cause is a primary infection by spore inhalation rather than by reactivation or transmission from the donor organ.13 Bird exposure is a risk factor for cryptococcal infection. One case identified the same strain of Cryptococcus in a kidney transplant recipient and the family’s pet cockatoo.14
Cryptococcal infection typically starts as pneumonia, which may be subclinical. The infection can then disseminate, with meningitis presenting with headache and mental status changes being the most concerning complication. The death rate is about 50% in most series of patients with meningitis. Skin and soft-tissue manifestations may also occur in 10% to 15% of cases and can be nodular, ulcerative, or cellulitic.
More than 75% of fungal infections requiring hospitalization in US patients who have undergone transplant are attributed to either Candida, Aspergillus, or Cryptococcus species.15 Risk of fungal infection is increased with diabetes, duration of pretransplant dialysis, tacrolimus therapy, or rejection treatment.
- Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1725–1730.
- Kasiske BL, Klinger D. Cigarette smoking in renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11:753–759.
- United Network for Organ Sharing. Transplant trends. https://transplantpro.org/technology/transplant-trends/#waitlists_by_organ. Accessed December 13, 2017.
- Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B. Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes: a paired donor kidney analysis. Transplantation 2002; 74:1377–1381.
- Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:589–597.
- Alonso P. Sanchez-Lazaro I, Almenar L, et al. Use of a “CNI holidays” strategy in acute renal dysfunction late after heart transplant. Report of two cases. Heart Int 2014; 9:74–77.
- Cantarovich M, Metrakos P, Giannetti N, Cecere R, Barkun J, Tchervenkov J. Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody coverage allows for calcineurin inhibitor “holiday” in solid organ transplant patients with acute renal dysfunction. Transplantation 2002; 73:1169–1172.
- Brennan DC, Daller JA, Lake KD, Cibrik D, Del Castillo D; Thymoglobulin Induction Study Group. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1967–1977.
- McCullough PA. Evaluation and treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2005; 67:S51–S58.
- Kasiske BL, Maclean JR, Snyder JJ. Acute myocardial infarction and kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:900–907.
- Bohl DL, Storch GA, Ryschkewitsch C, et al. Donor origin of BK virus in renal transplantation and role of HLA C7 in susceptibility to sustained BK viremia. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:2213–2221.
- Vilchez RA, Fung J, Kusne S. Cryptococcosis in organ transplant recipients: an overview. Am J Transplant 2002; 2:575–580.
- Vilchez R, Shapiro R, McCurry K, et al. Longitudinal study of cryptococcosis in adult solid-organ transplant recipients. Transpl Int 2003; 16:336–340.
- Nosanchuk JD, Shoham S, Fries BC, Shapiro DS, Levitz SM, Casadevall A. Evidence of zoonotic transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans from a pet cockatoo to an immunocompromised patient. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:205–208.
- Abbott KC, Hypolite I, Poropatich RK, et al. Hospitalizations for fungal infections after renal transplantation in the United States. Transpl Infect Dis 2001; 3:203–211.
Much has improved in renal transplantation over the past 20 years. The focus has shifted to using stronger immunotherapy rather than trying to minimize it. There has been increasing recognition of infection and ways to prevent and treat it. Induction therapy now has greater emphasis so that maintenance therapy can be eased, with the aim of reducing long-term toxicity. Perhaps the biggest change is the practice of screening for donor-specific antibodies at the time of transplant so that predictable problems can be prevented or better handled if they occur. Such advances have helped patients directly and by extending the life of their transplanted organs.
LONGER SURVIVAL
As early as the 1990s, it was recognized that kidney transplant offers a survival advantage for patients with end-stage renal disease over maintenance on dialysis.1 Although the risk of death is higher immediately after transplant, within a few months it becomes much lower than for patients on dialysis. Survival varies according to the health of the patient and the quality of the transplanted organ.
In general, patients who obtain the greatest benefit from transplants in terms of years of life gained are those with diabetes, especially those who are younger. Those ages 20 to 39 live about 8 years on dialysis vs 25 years after transplant.
CONTRAINDICATIONS TO TRANSPLANT
There are multiple contraindications to a solitary kidney transplant (Table 1), including smoking. Most transplant centers require that smokers quit before transplant. Long-standing smokers almost double their risk of a cardiac event after transplant and double their rate of malignancy. Active smoking at the time of transplant is associated with twice the risk of death by 10 years after transplant compared with that of nonsmokers.2 Cotinine testing can detect whether a patient is an active smoker.
WAITING-LIST CONSIDERATIONS
Organs are scarce
The number of patients on the kidney waiting list has increased rapidly in the last few decades, while the number of transplants performed each year has remained about the same. In 2016, about 100,000 patients were on the list, but only about 19,000 transplants were performed.3 Wait times, especially for deceased-donor organs, have increased to about 6 years, varying by blood type and geographic region.
Waiting-list placement
Placement on the waiting list for a deceased-donor kidney transplant occurs when a patient has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 or less, although referral to the list can be made earlier. Early listing remains advantageous, as total time on the list will be counted before starting dialysis. “Preemptive transplant” means the patient had no dialysis before transplant; this applies to about 10% of transplant recipients. These patients tend to fare the best and are usually recipients of a living-donor organ.
Most patients do not receive a transplant until the GFR is less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Since 2014, wait time has been measured from the beginning of dialysis rather than the date of waiting-list placement in patients who are listed after starting dialysis therapy. This approach is more fair but sometimes introduces problems. A patient who did not previously know about the list may suddenly jump to the head of the line after 10 years of dialysis, by which time comorbidities associated with long-term dialysis make the patient less likely to gain as much benefit from a transplant as people lower on the list. Time on dialysis, or “dialysis vintage,” predicts patient and kidney survival after transplant, with reduced survival associated with increasing time on dialysis.4
Shorter wait for a suboptimal kidney
The aging population has increased the number of older patients being listed for transplant, presenting multiple challenges. Patients age 65 or older have a 50% chance of dying before they receive a transplant during a 5-year wait.
A patient may shorten the wait by joining the list for a suboptimal organ. All deceased-donor organs are given a Kidney Donor Profile Index score, which predicts the longevity of an organ after transplant. The score is determined by donor age, kidney function based on the serum creatinine at the time of death, and other donor factors.
A kidney with a score higher than 85% is likely to function longer than only 15% of available kidneys. Patients who receive a kidney with that score have a longer period of risk of death soon after transplant and a slightly higher risk of death in the long term than patients who receive a healthier kidney, although on average they still do better than patients on dialysis.5
Older patients should be encouraged to sign up for both the regular waiting list and the suboptimal kidney waiting list to reduce the risk of dying before they get a kidney.
LIVING-DONOR ORGAN TRANSPLANT
Many advantages
Living-donor organ transplant is associated with a better survival rate than deceased-donor organ transplant, and the advantage becomes greater over time. At 1 year, patient survival is more than 90% in both groups, but by 5 years about 80% of patients with a living-donor organ are still alive vs only about 65% of patients with a deceased-donor organ.
The waiting time for a living-donor transplant may be only weeks to months, rather than years. Because increasing time on dialysis predicts worse patient and graft survival after transplant, the shorter wait time is a big advantage. In addition, because the donor and recipient are typically in adjacent operating rooms, the organ sustains less ischemic damage. In general, the kidney quality is better from healthy donors, resulting in superior function early on and longer graft survival by an average of 4 years. If the living donor is related to the recipient, human leukocyte antigen matching also tends to be better and predicts better outcomes.
Special challenges
Opting for a living-donor organ also entails special challenges. In addition to the ethical issues surrounding living-donor organ donation, an appropriate donor must be found. Donors must be highly motivated and pass physical, laboratory, and psychological evaluations.
For older patients, if the donor is a spouse or close friend, he or she is also likely to be older, making the organ less viable than one from a younger person. Even an adult child may not be an ideal donor if there is a family propensity to kidney disease, such as diabetic nephropathy. No test is available to determine the risk for future diabetes, but it is known to run in families.
POTENT IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
Induction therapy
Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab provides intense immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection during the early posttransplant period.
Antithymocyte globulin is a potent agent that contains antibodies directed at T cells, B cells, neutrophils, platelets, adhesion molecules, and complement. It binds T cells and removes them from circulation by opsonization in splenic and lymphoid tissue. The immunosuppressive effect is sustained for at least 2 to 3 months after a series of injections (dosage 1.5 mg/kg/day, usually for 4 to 10 doses). Antithymocyte globulin is also used to treat acute rejection, especially high-grade rejection for which steroid therapy is likely to be insufficient.
Basiliximab consists of antibodies to the interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor of T cells. Binding to T cells prevents their activation rather than removing them from circulation. The drug prevents rejection, with 30% relative reduction in early studies compared with placebo. However, it is ineffective in reversing established rejection. Dosage is 20 mg at day 0 and day 4, which provides receptor saturation for 30 to 45 days.
Basiliximab is also sometimes used off-label for patients who need to discontinue a calcineurin inhibitor (ie, tacrolimus or cyclosporine). In such cases, normal therapy is put on hold while basiliximab is given for 1 or 2 doses. Case series have been reported for this use, particularly for patients with a heart and liver transplant who develop acute kidney injury while hospitalized.6,7
Antithymocyte globulin is more effective but also more risky. Brennan et al8 randomized 278 transplant recipients to either antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab. Patients in the antithymocyte globulin group had a 16% rejection rate vs 26% in the basiliximab group.
Antithymocyte globulin therapy is associated with multiple adverse effects, including fever and chills, pulmonary edema, and long-standing immunosuppressive effects such as increased risk of lymphoma and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Basiliximab side-effect profiles are similar to those of placebo.
Maintenance therapy
The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus remain the standard of care in kidney transplant despite multiple drug interactions and side effects that include renal toxicity and fibrosis. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus both bind intracellular immunophilins and thereby prevent transcription of IL-2 and production of T cells. The drugs work similarly but have different binding sites. Cyclosporine has largely been replaced by tacrolimus because its reliability of dosing and higher potency are associated with lower rejection rates.
Tacrolimus is typically given twice daily (1–6 mg/dose). Twelve-hour trough levels are followed (target: 8–12 ng/mL early on, then 5–8 ng/mL after 3 months posttransplant). Side effects include hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, but less so than with cyclosporine. On the other hand, hyperglycemia tends to be worse with tacrolimus than with cyclosporine, and combining tacrolimus with steroids frequently leads to diabetes. Tacrolimus can also cause acute and chronic renal failure, especially at high drug levels, as well as neurotoxicity, tremors, and hair loss.
Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus (not a calcineurin inhibitor) are metabolized through the same cytochrome P450 pathway (CYP3A4), so they have common drug interactions (Table 2).
Mycophenolate mofetil is typically used as an adjunct therapy (500–1,000 mg twice daily). It is also used for other kidney diseases before transplant, including lupus nephritis. Transplanted kidney rejection rates with mycophenolate mofetil with steroids are about 40%, so the drug is not potent enough to be used without a calcineurin inhibitor.
Side effects include gastrointestinal toxicity in up to 20% of patients, and leukopenia, which is associated with viral infections.
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE IS COMMON WITH DIALYSIS
Coronary artery disease is highly associated with end-stage kidney disease and occurs in as many as 85% of older patients with diabetes on dialysis. Although patients with end-stage kidney disease tend to have more numerous and severe atherosclerotic lesions compared with the general population, justifying aggressive management, cardiac care tends to be conservative in patients on dialysis.9
Death from acute myocardial infarction occurs in about 20% to 30% of patients on dialysis vs about 2% of patients with normal renal function. Five years after myocardial infarction, survival is only about 30% in patients on dialysis.9
There are many explanations for excess coronary artery disease in patients on dialysis. In addition to the traditional cardiovascular risk factors of diabetes, hypertension, and preexisting coronary artery disease, patients are in a proinflammatory uremic state and have high levels of phosphorus and fibroblast growth factor 23 that contribute to vascular calcification. Almost all patients have high homocysteine levels and hemodynamic instability, particularly if they are on hemodialysis.
Pretransplant evaluation for heart disease
Patients on the kidney transplant waiting list are screened aggressively for heart disease. A history of myocardial infarction usually results in removal from the list. All patients have an initial electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Thallium or echocardiographic stress testing is used for patients who are age 50 and older, have diabetes, or have had dialysis for many years. Patients with evidence of ischemia undergo catheterization.
Patients are also screened with computed tomography before transplant. Because the kidney is typically anastomosed to the iliac artery and vein, heavy calcification of the iliac artery can make the procedure too difficult to perform.
Reduced long-term risk of myocardial infarction after transplant
Kasiske et al10 analyzed data from more than 50,000 patients from the US Renal Data System and found that, for about the first year after transplant, patients who underwent kidney transplant were more likely to have a myocardial infarction than those on dialysis. After that, they fared better than patients who remained on dialysis. Those with a living-donor transplant were less likely at all times to have a myocardial infarction than those with a deceased-donor transplant. By 3 years after transplant, the relative risk of having a myocardial infarction was 0.89 for deceased-donor organ recipients and 0.69 for living-donor recipients compared with patients on the waiting list.10
INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN KIDNEY RECIPIENTS
Kidney recipients are prone to many common and uncommon infections (Table 3). All potential recipients are tested pretransplant for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, and tuberculosis. A positive result does not necessarily rule out transplant.
The following viral serology tests are also done before transplant:
Epstein-Barr virus (antibodies are positive in about 90% of adults)
CMV (about 70% of adults are seropositive)
Varicella zoster (seronegative patients should be given live-attenuated varicella vaccine).
Risk of transmission of these viruses relates to the serostatus of the donor and recipient before transplant. If a donor is positive for viral antibodies but the recipient is not (a so-called “mismatch”), risk is higher after transplant.
Hepatitis C
Patients with hepatitis C fare better if they get a transplant than if they remain on dialysis, although their posttransplant course is worse compared with transplant patients who do not have hepatitis. Some patients develop accelerated liver disease after kidney transplant. Hepatitis C-related kidney disease—membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis—also occurs, as do comorbidities such as diabetes.
Careful evaluation is warranted before transplant, including liver imaging, alpha-fetoprotein testing, and liver biopsy to evaluate for hepatocellular carcinoma. A patient with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis may not be a candidate for kidney transplant alone but could possibly receive a combined kidney and liver transplant.
There is a need to determine the best time to treat hepatitis C infection. Patients with advanced liver disease or hepatitis C-related kidney disease would likely benefit from early treatment. However, delaying treatment could shorten the wait time for a deceased-donor organ positive for hepatitis C. Transplant candidates with active hepatitis C are uniquely considered to accept hepatitis C-positive kidneys, which are often discarded, and may only wait weeks for such a transplant. The shortened kidney survival associated with a hepatitis C-positive kidney may no longer be true with the new antiviral hepatitis C therapy, which has been shown to be effective post-transplant.
Hepatitis B
No cure is available for hepatitis B infection, but it can be well controlled with antiviral therapy. Patients with hepatitis B infection may be candidates for transplant, but they should be stable on antiviral therapy (lamivudine, entecavir, or tenofovir) to eliminate the viral load before transplant, and therapy should be continued afterward. Liver imaging, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and biopsy are recommended for evaluation. All hepatitis B- negative patients should be vaccinated before transplant.
Organs from living or deceased donors that test positive for hepatitis B core antibody, indicating prior exposure, can be considered for transplant in a patient who tests positive for hepatitis B surface antibody, indicating successful vaccination or prior exposure in the recipient. But donors must have negative surface antigen and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests that indicate no active hepatitis B infection.
Cytomegalovirus
CMV typically does not appear until prophylactic therapy is stopped. Classic symptoms are fever, leukopenia, and diarrhea. Infection can involve any organ, and patients may present with hepatitis, pancreatitis or, less commonly, pneumonitis.
Patients who are negative for CMV before transplant and receive a donor-positive organ are at the highest risk. Patients who are CMV IgG-positive are considered to be at intermediate risk, regardless of the donor status. Patients who are negative for CMV and receive a donor-negative organ are at the lowest risk and do not need prophylaxis with valganciclovir.
CMV infection is diagnosed by PCR testing of the blood or immunostaining in tissue biopsy. Occasionally, blood testing is negative in the face of tissue-based disease.
BK virus
BK is a polyoma virus and a common virus associated with kidney transplant. Viremia is seen in about 18% of patients, whereas actual kidney disease associated with a higher level of virus is seen in fewer than 10% of patients. Most people are exposed to BK virus, often in childhood, and it can remain indolent in the bladder and uroepithelium.
Patients can develop BK nephropathy after exposure to transplant immunosuppression.11 Posttransplant monitoring protocols typically include PCR testing for BK virus at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. No agent has been identified to specifically treat BK virus. The general strategy is to minimize immunosuppressive therapy by reducing or eliminating mycophenolate mofetil. Fortunately, BK virus does not tend to recur, and patients can have a low-level viremia (< 10,000 copies/mL) persisting over months or even years but often without clinical consequences.
The appearance of BK virus on biopsy can mimic acute rejection. Before BK viral nephropathy was a recognized entity, patients would have been diagnosed with acute rejection and may have been put on high-dose steroids, which would have worsened the BK infection.
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is most often associated with Epstein-Barr virus and usually involves a large, diffuse B-cell lymphoma. Burkitt lymphoma and plasma cell neoplasms also can occur less commonly.
The condition is about 30 times more common in patients after transplant than in the general population, and it is the third most common malignancy in transplant patients after skin and cervical cancers. About 80% of the cases occur early after transplant, within the first year.
Patients typically have a marked elevation in viral load of Epstein-Barr virus, although a negative viral load does not rule it out. A patient who is serologically negative for Epstein-Barr virus receiving a donor-positive kidney is at highest risk; this situation is most often seen in the pediatric population. Potent induction therapies (eg, antilymphocyte antibody therapy) are also associated with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.
Patients typically present with fever of unknown origin with no localizing signs or symptoms. Mass lesions can be challenging to find; positron emission tomography may be helpful. The culprit is usually a focal mass, ulcer (especially in the gastrointestinal tract), or infiltrate (commonly localized to the allograft). Multifocal or disseminated disease can also occur, including lymphoma or with central nervous system, gastrointestinal, or pulmonary involvement.
Biopsy of the affected site is required for histopathology and Epstein-Barr virus markers. PCR blood testing is often positive for Epstein-Barr virus.
Typical antiviral therapy does not eliminate Epstein-Barr virus. In early polyclonal viral proliferation, the first goal is to reduce immunosuppressive therapy. Rituximab alone may also help in polymorphic cases. With disease that is clearly monomorphic and has transformed to a true malignancy, cytotoxic chemotherapy is also required. “R-CHOP,” a combination therapy consisting of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, is usually used. Radiation therapy may help in some cases.
Cryptococcal infection
Previously seen in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, cryptococcal infection is now most commonly encountered in patients with solid-organ transplants. Vilchez et al12 found a 1% incidence in a series of more than 5,000 patients who had received an organ transplant.
Immunosuppression likely conveys risk, but because cryptococcal infection is acquired, environmental exposure also plays a role. It tends to appear more than 6 months after transplant, indicating that its cause is a primary infection by spore inhalation rather than by reactivation or transmission from the donor organ.13 Bird exposure is a risk factor for cryptococcal infection. One case identified the same strain of Cryptococcus in a kidney transplant recipient and the family’s pet cockatoo.14
Cryptococcal infection typically starts as pneumonia, which may be subclinical. The infection can then disseminate, with meningitis presenting with headache and mental status changes being the most concerning complication. The death rate is about 50% in most series of patients with meningitis. Skin and soft-tissue manifestations may also occur in 10% to 15% of cases and can be nodular, ulcerative, or cellulitic.
More than 75% of fungal infections requiring hospitalization in US patients who have undergone transplant are attributed to either Candida, Aspergillus, or Cryptococcus species.15 Risk of fungal infection is increased with diabetes, duration of pretransplant dialysis, tacrolimus therapy, or rejection treatment.
Much has improved in renal transplantation over the past 20 years. The focus has shifted to using stronger immunotherapy rather than trying to minimize it. There has been increasing recognition of infection and ways to prevent and treat it. Induction therapy now has greater emphasis so that maintenance therapy can be eased, with the aim of reducing long-term toxicity. Perhaps the biggest change is the practice of screening for donor-specific antibodies at the time of transplant so that predictable problems can be prevented or better handled if they occur. Such advances have helped patients directly and by extending the life of their transplanted organs.
LONGER SURVIVAL
As early as the 1990s, it was recognized that kidney transplant offers a survival advantage for patients with end-stage renal disease over maintenance on dialysis.1 Although the risk of death is higher immediately after transplant, within a few months it becomes much lower than for patients on dialysis. Survival varies according to the health of the patient and the quality of the transplanted organ.
In general, patients who obtain the greatest benefit from transplants in terms of years of life gained are those with diabetes, especially those who are younger. Those ages 20 to 39 live about 8 years on dialysis vs 25 years after transplant.
CONTRAINDICATIONS TO TRANSPLANT
There are multiple contraindications to a solitary kidney transplant (Table 1), including smoking. Most transplant centers require that smokers quit before transplant. Long-standing smokers almost double their risk of a cardiac event after transplant and double their rate of malignancy. Active smoking at the time of transplant is associated with twice the risk of death by 10 years after transplant compared with that of nonsmokers.2 Cotinine testing can detect whether a patient is an active smoker.
WAITING-LIST CONSIDERATIONS
Organs are scarce
The number of patients on the kidney waiting list has increased rapidly in the last few decades, while the number of transplants performed each year has remained about the same. In 2016, about 100,000 patients were on the list, but only about 19,000 transplants were performed.3 Wait times, especially for deceased-donor organs, have increased to about 6 years, varying by blood type and geographic region.
Waiting-list placement
Placement on the waiting list for a deceased-donor kidney transplant occurs when a patient has an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 or less, although referral to the list can be made earlier. Early listing remains advantageous, as total time on the list will be counted before starting dialysis. “Preemptive transplant” means the patient had no dialysis before transplant; this applies to about 10% of transplant recipients. These patients tend to fare the best and are usually recipients of a living-donor organ.
Most patients do not receive a transplant until the GFR is less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Since 2014, wait time has been measured from the beginning of dialysis rather than the date of waiting-list placement in patients who are listed after starting dialysis therapy. This approach is more fair but sometimes introduces problems. A patient who did not previously know about the list may suddenly jump to the head of the line after 10 years of dialysis, by which time comorbidities associated with long-term dialysis make the patient less likely to gain as much benefit from a transplant as people lower on the list. Time on dialysis, or “dialysis vintage,” predicts patient and kidney survival after transplant, with reduced survival associated with increasing time on dialysis.4
Shorter wait for a suboptimal kidney
The aging population has increased the number of older patients being listed for transplant, presenting multiple challenges. Patients age 65 or older have a 50% chance of dying before they receive a transplant during a 5-year wait.
A patient may shorten the wait by joining the list for a suboptimal organ. All deceased-donor organs are given a Kidney Donor Profile Index score, which predicts the longevity of an organ after transplant. The score is determined by donor age, kidney function based on the serum creatinine at the time of death, and other donor factors.
A kidney with a score higher than 85% is likely to function longer than only 15% of available kidneys. Patients who receive a kidney with that score have a longer period of risk of death soon after transplant and a slightly higher risk of death in the long term than patients who receive a healthier kidney, although on average they still do better than patients on dialysis.5
Older patients should be encouraged to sign up for both the regular waiting list and the suboptimal kidney waiting list to reduce the risk of dying before they get a kidney.
LIVING-DONOR ORGAN TRANSPLANT
Many advantages
Living-donor organ transplant is associated with a better survival rate than deceased-donor organ transplant, and the advantage becomes greater over time. At 1 year, patient survival is more than 90% in both groups, but by 5 years about 80% of patients with a living-donor organ are still alive vs only about 65% of patients with a deceased-donor organ.
The waiting time for a living-donor transplant may be only weeks to months, rather than years. Because increasing time on dialysis predicts worse patient and graft survival after transplant, the shorter wait time is a big advantage. In addition, because the donor and recipient are typically in adjacent operating rooms, the organ sustains less ischemic damage. In general, the kidney quality is better from healthy donors, resulting in superior function early on and longer graft survival by an average of 4 years. If the living donor is related to the recipient, human leukocyte antigen matching also tends to be better and predicts better outcomes.
Special challenges
Opting for a living-donor organ also entails special challenges. In addition to the ethical issues surrounding living-donor organ donation, an appropriate donor must be found. Donors must be highly motivated and pass physical, laboratory, and psychological evaluations.
For older patients, if the donor is a spouse or close friend, he or she is also likely to be older, making the organ less viable than one from a younger person. Even an adult child may not be an ideal donor if there is a family propensity to kidney disease, such as diabetic nephropathy. No test is available to determine the risk for future diabetes, but it is known to run in families.
POTENT IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
Induction therapy
Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab provides intense immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection during the early posttransplant period.
Antithymocyte globulin is a potent agent that contains antibodies directed at T cells, B cells, neutrophils, platelets, adhesion molecules, and complement. It binds T cells and removes them from circulation by opsonization in splenic and lymphoid tissue. The immunosuppressive effect is sustained for at least 2 to 3 months after a series of injections (dosage 1.5 mg/kg/day, usually for 4 to 10 doses). Antithymocyte globulin is also used to treat acute rejection, especially high-grade rejection for which steroid therapy is likely to be insufficient.
Basiliximab consists of antibodies to the interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor of T cells. Binding to T cells prevents their activation rather than removing them from circulation. The drug prevents rejection, with 30% relative reduction in early studies compared with placebo. However, it is ineffective in reversing established rejection. Dosage is 20 mg at day 0 and day 4, which provides receptor saturation for 30 to 45 days.
Basiliximab is also sometimes used off-label for patients who need to discontinue a calcineurin inhibitor (ie, tacrolimus or cyclosporine). In such cases, normal therapy is put on hold while basiliximab is given for 1 or 2 doses. Case series have been reported for this use, particularly for patients with a heart and liver transplant who develop acute kidney injury while hospitalized.6,7
Antithymocyte globulin is more effective but also more risky. Brennan et al8 randomized 278 transplant recipients to either antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab. Patients in the antithymocyte globulin group had a 16% rejection rate vs 26% in the basiliximab group.
Antithymocyte globulin therapy is associated with multiple adverse effects, including fever and chills, pulmonary edema, and long-standing immunosuppressive effects such as increased risk of lymphoma and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Basiliximab side-effect profiles are similar to those of placebo.
Maintenance therapy
The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus remain the standard of care in kidney transplant despite multiple drug interactions and side effects that include renal toxicity and fibrosis. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus both bind intracellular immunophilins and thereby prevent transcription of IL-2 and production of T cells. The drugs work similarly but have different binding sites. Cyclosporine has largely been replaced by tacrolimus because its reliability of dosing and higher potency are associated with lower rejection rates.
Tacrolimus is typically given twice daily (1–6 mg/dose). Twelve-hour trough levels are followed (target: 8–12 ng/mL early on, then 5–8 ng/mL after 3 months posttransplant). Side effects include hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, but less so than with cyclosporine. On the other hand, hyperglycemia tends to be worse with tacrolimus than with cyclosporine, and combining tacrolimus with steroids frequently leads to diabetes. Tacrolimus can also cause acute and chronic renal failure, especially at high drug levels, as well as neurotoxicity, tremors, and hair loss.
Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus (not a calcineurin inhibitor) are metabolized through the same cytochrome P450 pathway (CYP3A4), so they have common drug interactions (Table 2).
Mycophenolate mofetil is typically used as an adjunct therapy (500–1,000 mg twice daily). It is also used for other kidney diseases before transplant, including lupus nephritis. Transplanted kidney rejection rates with mycophenolate mofetil with steroids are about 40%, so the drug is not potent enough to be used without a calcineurin inhibitor.
Side effects include gastrointestinal toxicity in up to 20% of patients, and leukopenia, which is associated with viral infections.
CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE IS COMMON WITH DIALYSIS
Coronary artery disease is highly associated with end-stage kidney disease and occurs in as many as 85% of older patients with diabetes on dialysis. Although patients with end-stage kidney disease tend to have more numerous and severe atherosclerotic lesions compared with the general population, justifying aggressive management, cardiac care tends to be conservative in patients on dialysis.9
Death from acute myocardial infarction occurs in about 20% to 30% of patients on dialysis vs about 2% of patients with normal renal function. Five years after myocardial infarction, survival is only about 30% in patients on dialysis.9
There are many explanations for excess coronary artery disease in patients on dialysis. In addition to the traditional cardiovascular risk factors of diabetes, hypertension, and preexisting coronary artery disease, patients are in a proinflammatory uremic state and have high levels of phosphorus and fibroblast growth factor 23 that contribute to vascular calcification. Almost all patients have high homocysteine levels and hemodynamic instability, particularly if they are on hemodialysis.
Pretransplant evaluation for heart disease
Patients on the kidney transplant waiting list are screened aggressively for heart disease. A history of myocardial infarction usually results in removal from the list. All patients have an initial electrocardiogram and echocardiogram. Thallium or echocardiographic stress testing is used for patients who are age 50 and older, have diabetes, or have had dialysis for many years. Patients with evidence of ischemia undergo catheterization.
Patients are also screened with computed tomography before transplant. Because the kidney is typically anastomosed to the iliac artery and vein, heavy calcification of the iliac artery can make the procedure too difficult to perform.
Reduced long-term risk of myocardial infarction after transplant
Kasiske et al10 analyzed data from more than 50,000 patients from the US Renal Data System and found that, for about the first year after transplant, patients who underwent kidney transplant were more likely to have a myocardial infarction than those on dialysis. After that, they fared better than patients who remained on dialysis. Those with a living-donor transplant were less likely at all times to have a myocardial infarction than those with a deceased-donor transplant. By 3 years after transplant, the relative risk of having a myocardial infarction was 0.89 for deceased-donor organ recipients and 0.69 for living-donor recipients compared with patients on the waiting list.10
INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN KIDNEY RECIPIENTS
Kidney recipients are prone to many common and uncommon infections (Table 3). All potential recipients are tested pretransplant for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, syphilis, and tuberculosis. A positive result does not necessarily rule out transplant.
The following viral serology tests are also done before transplant:
Epstein-Barr virus (antibodies are positive in about 90% of adults)
CMV (about 70% of adults are seropositive)
Varicella zoster (seronegative patients should be given live-attenuated varicella vaccine).
Risk of transmission of these viruses relates to the serostatus of the donor and recipient before transplant. If a donor is positive for viral antibodies but the recipient is not (a so-called “mismatch”), risk is higher after transplant.
Hepatitis C
Patients with hepatitis C fare better if they get a transplant than if they remain on dialysis, although their posttransplant course is worse compared with transplant patients who do not have hepatitis. Some patients develop accelerated liver disease after kidney transplant. Hepatitis C-related kidney disease—membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis—also occurs, as do comorbidities such as diabetes.
Careful evaluation is warranted before transplant, including liver imaging, alpha-fetoprotein testing, and liver biopsy to evaluate for hepatocellular carcinoma. A patient with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis may not be a candidate for kidney transplant alone but could possibly receive a combined kidney and liver transplant.
There is a need to determine the best time to treat hepatitis C infection. Patients with advanced liver disease or hepatitis C-related kidney disease would likely benefit from early treatment. However, delaying treatment could shorten the wait time for a deceased-donor organ positive for hepatitis C. Transplant candidates with active hepatitis C are uniquely considered to accept hepatitis C-positive kidneys, which are often discarded, and may only wait weeks for such a transplant. The shortened kidney survival associated with a hepatitis C-positive kidney may no longer be true with the new antiviral hepatitis C therapy, which has been shown to be effective post-transplant.
Hepatitis B
No cure is available for hepatitis B infection, but it can be well controlled with antiviral therapy. Patients with hepatitis B infection may be candidates for transplant, but they should be stable on antiviral therapy (lamivudine, entecavir, or tenofovir) to eliminate the viral load before transplant, and therapy should be continued afterward. Liver imaging, alpha-fetoprotein levels, and biopsy are recommended for evaluation. All hepatitis B- negative patients should be vaccinated before transplant.
Organs from living or deceased donors that test positive for hepatitis B core antibody, indicating prior exposure, can be considered for transplant in a patient who tests positive for hepatitis B surface antibody, indicating successful vaccination or prior exposure in the recipient. But donors must have negative surface antigen and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests that indicate no active hepatitis B infection.
Cytomegalovirus
CMV typically does not appear until prophylactic therapy is stopped. Classic symptoms are fever, leukopenia, and diarrhea. Infection can involve any organ, and patients may present with hepatitis, pancreatitis or, less commonly, pneumonitis.
Patients who are negative for CMV before transplant and receive a donor-positive organ are at the highest risk. Patients who are CMV IgG-positive are considered to be at intermediate risk, regardless of the donor status. Patients who are negative for CMV and receive a donor-negative organ are at the lowest risk and do not need prophylaxis with valganciclovir.
CMV infection is diagnosed by PCR testing of the blood or immunostaining in tissue biopsy. Occasionally, blood testing is negative in the face of tissue-based disease.
BK virus
BK is a polyoma virus and a common virus associated with kidney transplant. Viremia is seen in about 18% of patients, whereas actual kidney disease associated with a higher level of virus is seen in fewer than 10% of patients. Most people are exposed to BK virus, often in childhood, and it can remain indolent in the bladder and uroepithelium.
Patients can develop BK nephropathy after exposure to transplant immunosuppression.11 Posttransplant monitoring protocols typically include PCR testing for BK virus at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. No agent has been identified to specifically treat BK virus. The general strategy is to minimize immunosuppressive therapy by reducing or eliminating mycophenolate mofetil. Fortunately, BK virus does not tend to recur, and patients can have a low-level viremia (< 10,000 copies/mL) persisting over months or even years but often without clinical consequences.
The appearance of BK virus on biopsy can mimic acute rejection. Before BK viral nephropathy was a recognized entity, patients would have been diagnosed with acute rejection and may have been put on high-dose steroids, which would have worsened the BK infection.
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder is most often associated with Epstein-Barr virus and usually involves a large, diffuse B-cell lymphoma. Burkitt lymphoma and plasma cell neoplasms also can occur less commonly.
The condition is about 30 times more common in patients after transplant than in the general population, and it is the third most common malignancy in transplant patients after skin and cervical cancers. About 80% of the cases occur early after transplant, within the first year.
Patients typically have a marked elevation in viral load of Epstein-Barr virus, although a negative viral load does not rule it out. A patient who is serologically negative for Epstein-Barr virus receiving a donor-positive kidney is at highest risk; this situation is most often seen in the pediatric population. Potent induction therapies (eg, antilymphocyte antibody therapy) are also associated with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.
Patients typically present with fever of unknown origin with no localizing signs or symptoms. Mass lesions can be challenging to find; positron emission tomography may be helpful. The culprit is usually a focal mass, ulcer (especially in the gastrointestinal tract), or infiltrate (commonly localized to the allograft). Multifocal or disseminated disease can also occur, including lymphoma or with central nervous system, gastrointestinal, or pulmonary involvement.
Biopsy of the affected site is required for histopathology and Epstein-Barr virus markers. PCR blood testing is often positive for Epstein-Barr virus.
Typical antiviral therapy does not eliminate Epstein-Barr virus. In early polyclonal viral proliferation, the first goal is to reduce immunosuppressive therapy. Rituximab alone may also help in polymorphic cases. With disease that is clearly monomorphic and has transformed to a true malignancy, cytotoxic chemotherapy is also required. “R-CHOP,” a combination therapy consisting of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, is usually used. Radiation therapy may help in some cases.
Cryptococcal infection
Previously seen in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome, cryptococcal infection is now most commonly encountered in patients with solid-organ transplants. Vilchez et al12 found a 1% incidence in a series of more than 5,000 patients who had received an organ transplant.
Immunosuppression likely conveys risk, but because cryptococcal infection is acquired, environmental exposure also plays a role. It tends to appear more than 6 months after transplant, indicating that its cause is a primary infection by spore inhalation rather than by reactivation or transmission from the donor organ.13 Bird exposure is a risk factor for cryptococcal infection. One case identified the same strain of Cryptococcus in a kidney transplant recipient and the family’s pet cockatoo.14
Cryptococcal infection typically starts as pneumonia, which may be subclinical. The infection can then disseminate, with meningitis presenting with headache and mental status changes being the most concerning complication. The death rate is about 50% in most series of patients with meningitis. Skin and soft-tissue manifestations may also occur in 10% to 15% of cases and can be nodular, ulcerative, or cellulitic.
More than 75% of fungal infections requiring hospitalization in US patients who have undergone transplant are attributed to either Candida, Aspergillus, or Cryptococcus species.15 Risk of fungal infection is increased with diabetes, duration of pretransplant dialysis, tacrolimus therapy, or rejection treatment.
- Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1725–1730.
- Kasiske BL, Klinger D. Cigarette smoking in renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11:753–759.
- United Network for Organ Sharing. Transplant trends. https://transplantpro.org/technology/transplant-trends/#waitlists_by_organ. Accessed December 13, 2017.
- Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B. Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes: a paired donor kidney analysis. Transplantation 2002; 74:1377–1381.
- Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:589–597.
- Alonso P. Sanchez-Lazaro I, Almenar L, et al. Use of a “CNI holidays” strategy in acute renal dysfunction late after heart transplant. Report of two cases. Heart Int 2014; 9:74–77.
- Cantarovich M, Metrakos P, Giannetti N, Cecere R, Barkun J, Tchervenkov J. Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody coverage allows for calcineurin inhibitor “holiday” in solid organ transplant patients with acute renal dysfunction. Transplantation 2002; 73:1169–1172.
- Brennan DC, Daller JA, Lake KD, Cibrik D, Del Castillo D; Thymoglobulin Induction Study Group. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1967–1977.
- McCullough PA. Evaluation and treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2005; 67:S51–S58.
- Kasiske BL, Maclean JR, Snyder JJ. Acute myocardial infarction and kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:900–907.
- Bohl DL, Storch GA, Ryschkewitsch C, et al. Donor origin of BK virus in renal transplantation and role of HLA C7 in susceptibility to sustained BK viremia. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:2213–2221.
- Vilchez RA, Fung J, Kusne S. Cryptococcosis in organ transplant recipients: an overview. Am J Transplant 2002; 2:575–580.
- Vilchez R, Shapiro R, McCurry K, et al. Longitudinal study of cryptococcosis in adult solid-organ transplant recipients. Transpl Int 2003; 16:336–340.
- Nosanchuk JD, Shoham S, Fries BC, Shapiro DS, Levitz SM, Casadevall A. Evidence of zoonotic transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans from a pet cockatoo to an immunocompromised patient. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:205–208.
- Abbott KC, Hypolite I, Poropatich RK, et al. Hospitalizations for fungal infections after renal transplantation in the United States. Transpl Infect Dis 2001; 3:203–211.
- Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1725–1730.
- Kasiske BL, Klinger D. Cigarette smoking in renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000; 11:753–759.
- United Network for Organ Sharing. Transplant trends. https://transplantpro.org/technology/transplant-trends/#waitlists_by_organ. Accessed December 13, 2017.
- Meier-Kriesche HU, Kaplan B. Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes: a paired donor kidney analysis. Transplantation 2002; 74:1377–1381.
- Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:589–597.
- Alonso P. Sanchez-Lazaro I, Almenar L, et al. Use of a “CNI holidays” strategy in acute renal dysfunction late after heart transplant. Report of two cases. Heart Int 2014; 9:74–77.
- Cantarovich M, Metrakos P, Giannetti N, Cecere R, Barkun J, Tchervenkov J. Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody coverage allows for calcineurin inhibitor “holiday” in solid organ transplant patients with acute renal dysfunction. Transplantation 2002; 73:1169–1172.
- Brennan DC, Daller JA, Lake KD, Cibrik D, Del Castillo D; Thymoglobulin Induction Study Group. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:1967–1977.
- McCullough PA. Evaluation and treatment of coronary artery disease in patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2005; 67:S51–S58.
- Kasiske BL, Maclean JR, Snyder JJ. Acute myocardial infarction and kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:900–907.
- Bohl DL, Storch GA, Ryschkewitsch C, et al. Donor origin of BK virus in renal transplantation and role of HLA C7 in susceptibility to sustained BK viremia. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:2213–2221.
- Vilchez RA, Fung J, Kusne S. Cryptococcosis in organ transplant recipients: an overview. Am J Transplant 2002; 2:575–580.
- Vilchez R, Shapiro R, McCurry K, et al. Longitudinal study of cryptococcosis in adult solid-organ transplant recipients. Transpl Int 2003; 16:336–340.
- Nosanchuk JD, Shoham S, Fries BC, Shapiro DS, Levitz SM, Casadevall A. Evidence of zoonotic transmission of Cryptococcus neoformans from a pet cockatoo to an immunocompromised patient. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:205–208.
- Abbott KC, Hypolite I, Poropatich RK, et al. Hospitalizations for fungal infections after renal transplantation in the United States. Transpl Infect Dis 2001; 3:203–211.
KEY POINTS
- Kidney transplant improves survival and long-term outcomes in patients with renal failure.
- Before transplant, patients should be carefully evaluated for cardiovascular and infectious disease risk.
- Potent immunosuppression is required to maintain a successful kidney transplant.
- After transplant, patients must be monitored for recurrent disease, side effects of immunosuppression, and opportunistic infections.
PCI for stable angina: A missed opportunity for shared decision-making
Multiple randomized controlled trials have compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs optimal medical therapy for patients with chronic stable angina. All have consistently shown that PCI does not reduce the risk of death or even myocardial infarction (MI) but that it may relieve angina temporarily. Nevertheless, PCI is still commonly performed for patients with stable coronary disease, often in the absence of angina, and patients mistakenly believe the procedure is life-saving. Cardiologists may not be aware of patients’ misperceptions, or worse, may encourage them. In either case, if patients do not understand the benefits of the procedure, they cannot give informed consent.
This article reviews the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease, evidence from clinical trials of the value of PCI for chronic stable angina, patient and physician perceptions of PCI, and ways to promote patient-centered, shared decision-making.
CLINICAL CASE: EXERTIONAL ANGINA
While climbing 4 flights of stairs, a 55-year-old man noticed tightness in his chest, which lasted for 5 minutes and resolved spontaneously. Several weeks later, when visiting his primary care physician, he mentioned the episode. He had had no symptoms in the interim, but the physician ordered an exercise stress test.
Six minutes into a standard Bruce protocol, the patient experienced the same chest tightness, accompanied by 1-mm ST-segment depressions in leads II, III, and aVF. He was then referred to a cardiologist, who recommended catheterization.
Catheterization demonstrated a 95% stenosis of the right coronary artery with nonsignificant stenoses of the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries. A drug-eluting stent was placed in the right coronary artery, with no residual stenosis.
Did this intervention likely prevent an MI and perhaps save the man’s life?
HOW MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION HAPPENS
Understanding the pathogenesis of MI is critical to having realistic expectations of the benefits of stent placement.
Doctors often describe coronary atherosclerosis as a plumbing problem, where deposits of cholesterol and fat build up in arterial walls, clogging the pipes and eventually causing a heart attack. This analogy, which has been around since the 1950s, is easy to for patients to grasp and has been popularized in the press and internalized by the public—as one patient with a 95% stenosis put it, “I was 95% dead.” In that model, angioplasty and stenting can resolve the blockage and “fix” the problem, much as a plumber can clear your pipes with a Roto-Rooter.
Despite the visual appeal of this model,1 it doesn’t accurately convey what we know about the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Instead of a gradual buildup of fatty deposits, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles infiltrate arterial walls and trigger an inflammatory reaction as they are engulfed by macrophages, leading to a cascade of cytokines and recruitment of more inflammatory cells.2 This immune response can eventually cause the rupture of the plaque’s fibrous cap, triggering thrombosis and infarction, often at a site of insignificant stenosis.
In this new model, coronary artery disease is primarily a problem of inflammation distributed throughout the vasculature, rather than a mechanical problem localized to the site of a significant stenosis.
Significant stenosis does not equal unstable plaque
Not all plaques are equally likely to rupture. Stable plaques tend to be long-standing and calcified, with a thick fibrous cap. A stable plaque causing a 95% stenosis may cause symptoms with exertion, but it is unlikely to cause infarction.3 Conversely, rupture-prone plaques may cause little stenosis, but a large and dangerous plaque may be lurking beneath the thin fibrous cap.
Relying on angiography can be misleading. Treating all significant stenoses improves blood flow, but does not reduce the risk of infarction, because infarction most often occurs in areas where the lumen is not obstructed. A plaque causing only 30% stenosis can suddenly rupture, causing thrombosis and complete occlusion.
The current model explains why PCI is no better than optimal medical therapy (ie, risk factor modification, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, and a statin). Diet, exercise, smoking cessation, and statins target inflammatory processes and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, while aspirin prevents platelet aggregation, among other likely actions.
The model also explains why coronary artery bypass grafting reduces the risk of MI and death in patients with left main or 3-vessel disease. A patient with generalized coronary artery disease has multiple lesions, many of which do not cause significant stenoses. PCI corrects only a single stenosis, whereas coronary artery bypass grafting circumvents all the vulnerable plaques in a vessel.
THE LANDMARK COURAGE TRIAL
Published in 2007, the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial4 randomized more than 2,000 patients to receive either optimal medical therapy plus PCI or optimal medical therapy alone. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and nonfatal MI. Patients were followed for at least 3 years, and some for as long as 7 years.
There was an initial small upward spike in the primary outcome in the PCI arm due to periprocedural events. By 5 years, the outcomes of the 2 arms converged and then stayed the same for up to 15 years.5 The authors concluded that PCI conferred no benefit over optimal medical therapy in the risk of death or MI.
Some doctors dismiss the study because of its stringent entry criteria—of 35,539 patients assessed, only 3,071 met the eligibility criteria. However, the entry criteria were meant to identify patients most likely to benefit from PCI. Many patients who undergo PCI today would not have qualified for the study because they lack objective evidence of ischemia.6 To enroll, patients needed a proximal stenosis of at least 70% and objective evidence of ischemia or a coronary stenosis of more than 80% and classic angina. Exclusion criteria disqualified few patients: Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV angina (ie, angina evoked from minimal activity or at rest); a markedly positive stress test (substantial ST-segment depression or hypotension during stage I of the Bruce protocol); refractory heart failure or cardiogenic shock; an ejection fraction of less than 30%; revascularization within the past 6 months; and coronary anatomy unsuitable for PCI.
OTHER TRIALS SUPPORT COURAGE FINDINGS
Although COURAGE was hailed as a landmark trial, it largely supported the results of previous studies. A meta-analysis of PCI vs optimal medical therapy published in 2005 found no significant differences in death, cardiac death, MI, or nonfatal MI.7 MI was actually slightly more common in the PCI group due to the increased risk of MI during the periprocedural period.
Nor has the evidence from COURAGE discouraged additional studies of the same topic. Despite consistent findings that fit with our understanding of coronary disease as inflammation, we continue to conduct studies aimed at addressing significant stenosis, as if that was the problem. Thus, there have been studies of angioplasty alone, followed by studies of bare-metal stents and then drug-eluting stents.
In 2009, Trikalinos et al published a review of 61 randomized controlled trials comprising more than 25,000 patients with stable coronary disease and comparing medical therapy and angioplasty in its various forms over the previous 20 years.8 In all direct and indirect comparisons of PCI and medical therapy, there were no improvements in rates of death or MI.
Even so, the studies continue. The most recent “improvement” was the addition of fractional flow reserve, which served as the inclusion criterion for the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) trial.9 In that study, patients with at least 1 stenosis with a fractional flow reserve less than 0.80 were randomized to PCI plus medical therapy or to medical therapy alone. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, MI, and urgent revascularization. Unfortunately, the study was stopped early when the primary end point was met due to a reduction in the need for urgent revascularization. There was no reduction in the rate of MI (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.51–2.19).
The reduction in urgent revascularization has also been shown consistently in past studies, but this is the weakest outcome measure because it does not equate to a reduction in the rate of MI. There is no demonstrable harm to putting off stent placement, even in functionally significant arteries, and most patients do not require a stent, even in the future.
In summary, the primary benefit of getting a stent now is a reduced likelihood of needing one later.
PCI MAY IMPROVE ANGINA FASTER
Another important finding of the COURAGE trial was that PCI improved symptoms more than optimal medical therapy.10 This is not surprising, because angina is often a direct result of a significant stenosis. What was unexpected was that even after PCI, most patients were not symptom-free. At 1 month, significantly more PCI patients were angina-free (42%) than were medical patients (33%). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 9% or a number needed to treat of 11 to prevent 1 case of angina.
Patients in both groups improved over time, and after 3 years, the difference between the 2 groups was no longer significant: 59% in the PCI group vs 56% in the medical therapy group were angina-free.
A more recent study has raised the possibility that the improvement in angina with PCI is primarily a placebo effect. Researchers in the United Kingdom randomized patients with stable angina and at least a 70% stenosis of one vessel to either PCI or sham PCI, in which they threaded the catheter but did not deploy the stent.11 All patients received aggressive antianginal therapy before the procedure. At 6 weeks, there was improvement in angina in both groups, but no statistically significant difference between them in either exercise time or angina. Approximately half the patients in each group improved by at least 1 grade on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification, and more than 20% improved 2 grades.
This finding is not without precedent. Ligation of the internal mammary arteries, a popular treatment for angina in the 1950s, often provided dramatic relief of symptoms, until it was proven to be no better than a sham operation.12,13 More recently, a placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization also failed to show improvement over a sham treatment, despite promising results from a phase 1 trial.14 Together, these studies emphasize the subjective nature of angina as an outcome and call into question the routine use of PCI to relieve it.
PCI ENTAILS RISK
PCI entails a small but not inconsequential risk. During the procedure, 2% of patients develop bleeding or blood vessel damage, and another 1% die or have an MI or a stroke. In the first year after stent placement, 3% of patients have a bleeding event from the antiplatelet therapy needed for the stent, and an additional 2% develop a clot in the stent that leads to MI.15
INFORMED CONSENT IS CRITICAL
As demonstrated above, for patients with stable angina, the only evidence-based benefit of PCI over optimal medical therapy is that symptoms may respond faster. At the same time, there are costs and risks associated with the procedure. Because symptoms are subjective, patients should play a key role in deciding whether PCI is appropriate for them.
The American Medical Association states that a physician providing any treatment or procedure should disclose and discuss with patients the risks and benefits. Unfortunately, a substantial body of evidence demonstrates that this is not occurring in practice.
Patients and cardiologists have conflicting beliefs about PCI
Studies over the past 20 years demonstrate that patients with chronic stable angina consistently overestimate the benefits of PCI, with 71% to 88% believing that it will reduce their chance of death.16–19 Patients also understand that PCI can relieve their symptoms, though no study seems to have assessed the perceived magnitude of this benefit.
In contrast, when cardiologists were asked about the benefits their patients could expect from PCI, only 20% said that it would reduce mortality and 25% said it would prevent MI.18 These are still surprisingly high percentages, since the study was conducted after the COURAGE trial.
Nevertheless, these differences in perception show that cardiologists fail to successfully communicate the benefits of the procedure to their patients. Without complete information, patients cannot make informed decisions.
Cardiologists’ reasons for performing PCI
If PCI cannot improve hard outcomes like MI or death in stable coronary disease, why do cardiologists continue to perform it so frequently?
Soon after the COURAGE trial, Lin et al conducted focus groups with cardiologists to find out.20 Some said that they doubted the clinical trial evidence, given the reduction in the cardiac mortality rate over the past 30 years. Others remarked that their overriding goal is to stamp out ischemia, and that once a lesion is found by catheterization, one must proceed with PCI. This has been termed the “oculostenotic reflex,” ie, the interventionist sees coronary artery disease and immediately places a stent.
Atreya et al found objective evidence of this practice.21 In a 2016 study of 207 patients with obstructive lesions amenable to PCI, the only factors associated with medical management were those that increased the risk of the procedure: age, chronic kidney disease, distal location of the lesion, and type C lesions (the most difficult ones to treat by PCI). More important, evidence of ischemia, presence of angina, and being on optimal medical therapy or maximal antianginal therapy were not associated with PCI.
When surveyed, cardiologists offered reasons similar to those identified by Lin et al, including a positive stress test (70%) and significant myocardium at risk (50%).18 Optimal medical therapy failure was cited less often (40%). Over 30% identified relief of chest pain for patients who were not prescribed optimal medical therapy. Another 30% said that patient anxiety contributed to their decision, but patients who reported anxiety were not more likely to get PCI than those who did not.
True informed consent rarely occurs
Surveys of patients and recordings of doctor visits suggest that doctors often discuss the risks of the procedure but rarely accurately describe the benefits or mention alternative treatments, including optimal medical therapy.
Fowler et al22 surveyed 472 Medicare patients who had undergone PCI in the past year about their consent discussion, particularly regarding alternative options. Only 6% of patients recalled discussing medication as a serious option with their doctor.
In 2 published studies,23,24 we analyzed recorded conversations between doctors and patients in which angiography and PCI were discussed.
In a qualitative assessment of how cardiologists presented the rationale for PCI to patients,23 we observed that cardiologists gave an accurate presentation of the benefits in only 5% of cases. In 13% of the conversations the benefits were explicitly overstated (eg, “If you don’t do it [angiogram/PCI], what could happen? Well, you could…have a heart attack involving that area which can lead to a sudden death”). In another 35% of cases, physicians offered an implicit overstatement of the benefit by saying they could “fix” the problem (eg, “So that’s where we start thinking, Well maybe we better try to fix that [blockage]”), without specifically stating that fixing the problem would offer any benefit. Patients were left to fill in the blanks. Conversations frequently focused on the rationale for performing PCI (eg, ischemia on a stress test) and a description of the procedure, rather than on the risks and benefits.
In a quantitative study of the same data set, we assessed how often physicians addressed the 7 elements of informed decision-making as defined by Braddock et al.24
- Explaining the patient’s role in decision-making (ie, that the patient has a choice to make) was present in half of the conversations. Sometimes a doctor would simply say, “The next step is to perform catheterization.”
- Discussion of clinical issues (eg, having a blockage, stress test results) was performed in almost every case, demonstrating physicians’ comfort with that element.
- Discussing treatment alternatives occurred in only 1 in 4 conversations. This was more frequent than previously reported, and appeared most often when patients expressed hesitancy about proceeding to PCI.
- Discussing pros and cons of the alternatives was done in 42%.
- Uncertainty about the procedure (eg, that it might not relieve the angina) was expressed in only 10% of conversations.
- Assessment of patient understanding was done in 65% of cases. This included even minimal efforts (eg, “Do you have any questions?”). More advanced methods such as teach-back were never used.
- Exploration of patient preferences (eg, asking patients which treatment they prefer, or attempting to understand how angina affects a patient’s life) the final element, occurred in 73% of conversations.
Only 3% of the conversations contained all 7 elements. Even using a more relaxed definition of 3 critical elements (ie, discussing clinical issues, treatment alternatives, and pros and cons), only 13% of conversations included them all.
Discussion affects decisions
Informed decision-making is not only important because of its ethical implications. Offering patients more information was associated with their choosing not to have PCI. The probability of a patient undergoing PCI was negatively associated with 3 specific elements of informed decision-making. Patients were less likely to choose PCI if the patient’s role in decision-making was discussed (61% vs 86% chose PCI, P < .03); if alternatives were discussed (31% vs 89% chose PCI, P < .01); and if uncertainties were discussed (17% vs 80% chose PCI, P < .01).
There was also a linear relationship between the total number of elements discussed and the probability of choosing PCI: it ranged from 100% of patients choosing PCI when just 1 element was present to 3% of patients choosing PCI when all 7 elements were present. The relationship is not entirely causal, since doctors were more likely to talk about alternatives and risks if patients hesitated and raised questions. Cautious patients received more information.
From these observational studies, we know that physicians do not generally communicate the benefits of PCI, and patients make incorrect assumptions about the benefits they can expect. We know that those who receive more information are less likely to choose PCI, but what would happen if patients were randomly assigned to receive complete information?
An online survey
We conducted an online survey of more than 1,000 participants over age 50 who had never undergone PCI, asking them to imagine visiting a cardiologist after having a positive stress test for stable chest pain.25 Three intervention groups read different scenarios couched as information provided by their cardiologist:
- The “standard care” group received no specific information about the effects of PCI on the risk of myocardial infarction
- The “specific information” group was specifically told that PCI does not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction
- The “explanatory information” group was told how medications work and why PCI does not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction.
All 3 groups received information about the risks of PCI, its role in reducing angina, and the risks and benefits of optimal medical therapy.
After reading their scenario, all participants completed an identical questionnaire, which asked if they would opt for PCI, medical therapy, or both. Overall, 55% chose PCI, ranging from 70% in the standard care group to 46% in the group given explanatory information. Rates in the specific-information and explanatory-information groups were not statistically different from each other, but both were significantly different from that in the standard-care group. Interestingly, the more information patients were given about PCI, the more likely they were to choose optimal medical therapy.
After reading the scenario, participants were also asked if PCI would “prevent a heart attack.” Of those who received standard care, 71% endorsed that belief, which is remarkably similar to studies of real patients who have received standard care. In contrast, only 39% of those given specific information and 31% given explanatory information held that belief. Moreover, the belief that PCI prevented MI was the strongest predictor of choosing PCI (odds ratio 5.82, 95% confidence interval 4.13–8.26).25
Interestingly, 52% of the standard care group falsely remembered that the doctor had told them that PCI would prevent an MI, even though the doctor said nothing about it one way or the other. It appears that participants were projecting their own beliefs onto the encounter. This highlights the importance of providing full information to patients who are considering this procedure.
TOWARD SHARED DECISION-MAKING
Shared decision-making is a process in which physicians enter into a partnership with a patient, offer information, elicit the patient’s preferences, and then come to a decision in concert with the patient.
Although many decisions can and should involve elements of shared decision-making, the decision to proceed with PCI for stable angina is particularly well-suited to shared decision-making. This is because the benefit of PCI depends on the value a patient attaches to being free of angina sooner. Since there is no difference in the risk of MI or death, the patient must decide if the risks of the procedure and the inconvenience of taking dual antiplatelet therapy are worth the benefit of improving symptoms faster. Presumably, patients who have more severe symptoms or experienced side effects from antianginal therapy would be more likely to choose PCI.
Despite having substantial experience educating patients, most physicians are unfamiliar with the process of shared decision-making. In particular, the process of eliciting preferences is often overlooked.
To address this issue, researchers at the Mayo Clinic developed a decision aid that compares PCI plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone in an easily understandable information card.15 On one side, the 2 options are clearly stated, with the magnitude of symptom improvement over time graphically illustrated and the statement, “NO DIFFERENCE in heart attack or death,” prominently displayed. The back of the card discusses the risks of each option in easily understood tables.
The decision aid was compared with standard care in a randomized trial involving patients who were referred for catheterization and possible PCI.26 The decision aid improved patients’ overall knowledge about PCI. In particular, 60% of those who used the decision aid knew that PCI did not prevent death or MI vs 40% of usual-care patients—results similar to those of the online experiment.
Interestingly, the decision about whether to undergo PCI did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward more patients in the decision-aid group choosing medical therapy alone (53%) vs the standard-care patients (39%).
To understand why the decision aid did not make more of a difference, the investigators performed qualitative interviews of the cardiologists in the study.27 One theme was the timing of the intervention. Patients using the decision aid had already been referred for catheterization, and some felt the process should have occurred earlier. Engaging in shared decision-making with a general cardiologist before referral could help to improve the quality of patient decisions.
Cardiologists also noted the difficulty in changing their work flow to incorporate the decision aid. Although some embraced the idea of shared decision-making, others were concerned that many patients could not participate, and there was confusion about the difference between an educational tool, which could be used by a patient alone, and a decision aid, which is meant to generate discussion between the doctor and patient. Some expressed interest in using the tool in the future.
These findings serve to emphasize that providing information alone is not enough. If the physician does not “buy in” to the idea of shared decision-making, it will not occur.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
Based on the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease and the results of multiple randomized controlled trials, it is evident that PCI does not prevent heart attacks in patients with chronic stable angina. However, most patients who undergo PCI are unaware of this and therefore do not truly give informed consent. In the absence of explicit information to the contrary, most patients with stable angina assume that PCI prevents MI and thus are biased toward choosing PCI.
Even minimal amounts of explicit information can partially overcome that bias and influence decision-making. In particular, explaining why PCI does not prevent MI was the most effective means of overcoming the bias.
To this end, shared decision aids may help physicians to engage in shared decision-making. Shared decision-making is most likely to occur if physicians are trained in the concept of shared decision-making, are committed to practicing it, and can fit it into their work flow. Ideally, this would occur in the office of a general cardiologist before referral for PCI.
For those practicing in accountable-care organizations, Medicare has recently introduced the shared decision-making model for 6 preference-sensitive conditions, including stable ischemic heart disease. Participants in this program will have the opportunity to receive payments for shared decision-making services and to share in any savings that result from reduced use of resources. Use of these tools holds the promise for providing more patient-centered care at lower cost.
- Jones DS. Visions of a cure. Visualization, clinical trials, and controversies in cardiac therapeutics, 1968–1998. Isis 2000; 91:504–541.
- Hansson G. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1685–1695.
- Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:226–235.
- Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1503–1516.
- Sedlis SP, Hartigan PM, Teo KK, et al. Effect of PCI on long-term survival in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1937–1946.
- Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, Malenka DJ, Vittinghoff E, Redberg RF. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2008; 300:1765–1773.
- Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005; 111:2906–2912.
- Trikalinos TA, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Tatsioni A, Nallamothu BK, Kent DM. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373:911–918.
- De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:991–1001.
- Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:677–687.
- Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi H-M, et al, on behalf of the ORBITA Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Published online November 2, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9. Accessed November 10, 2017.
- Cobb LA, Thomas GI, Dillard DH, et al. An evaluation of internal mammary-artery ligation by a double-blind technic. N Engl J Med 1959; 260:1115–1118.
- Dimond EG, Fittle F, Crockett JE. Comparison of internal mammary artery ligation and sham operation for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1960; 5:483-486.
- Leon MB, Kornowski R, Downey WE, et al. A blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization to improve angina symptoms in patients with severe coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:1812–1819.
- Coylewright M, Shepel K, Leblanc A, et al. Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice. PLoS One 2012; 7:e49827.
- Holmboe ES, Fiellin DA, Cusanelli E, Remetz M, Krumholz HM. Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15:632–637.
- Kee F, McDonald P, Gaffney B. Risks and benefits of coronary angioplasty: the patients perspective: a preliminary study. Qual Health Care 1997; 6:131–139.
- Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, et al. Patients’ and cardiologists’ perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153:307–313.
- Whittle J, Conigliaro J, Good CB, Kelley ME, Skanderson M. Understanding of the benefits of coronary revascularization procedures among patients who are offered such procedures. Am Heart J 2007; 154:662–668.
- Lin GA, Dudley RA, Redberg RF. Cardiologists’ use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167:1604–1609.
- Atreya AR, Sivalingam SK, Arora S, et al. Predictors of medical management in patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization for chronic ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol 2016; 39:207–214.
- Fowler FJ Jr, Gallagher PM, Bynum JP, Barry MJ, Lucas FL, Skinner JS. Decision-making process reported by Medicare patients who had coronary artery stenting or surgery for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:911–916.
- Goff SL, Mazor KM, Ting HH, Kleppel R, Rothberg MB. How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:1614–1621.
- Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999; 282:2313–2320.
- Rothberg MB, Scherer L, Kashef MA, et al. The effect of information presentation on beliefs about the benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:1623–1629.
- Coylewright M, Dick S, Zmolek B, et al. PCI choice decision aid for stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016; 9:767–776.
- Coylewright M, O’Neill ES, Dick S, Grande SW. PCI choice: cardiovascular clinicians’ perceptions of shared decision making in stable coronary artery disease. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100:1136–1143.
Multiple randomized controlled trials have compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs optimal medical therapy for patients with chronic stable angina. All have consistently shown that PCI does not reduce the risk of death or even myocardial infarction (MI) but that it may relieve angina temporarily. Nevertheless, PCI is still commonly performed for patients with stable coronary disease, often in the absence of angina, and patients mistakenly believe the procedure is life-saving. Cardiologists may not be aware of patients’ misperceptions, or worse, may encourage them. In either case, if patients do not understand the benefits of the procedure, they cannot give informed consent.
This article reviews the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease, evidence from clinical trials of the value of PCI for chronic stable angina, patient and physician perceptions of PCI, and ways to promote patient-centered, shared decision-making.
CLINICAL CASE: EXERTIONAL ANGINA
While climbing 4 flights of stairs, a 55-year-old man noticed tightness in his chest, which lasted for 5 minutes and resolved spontaneously. Several weeks later, when visiting his primary care physician, he mentioned the episode. He had had no symptoms in the interim, but the physician ordered an exercise stress test.
Six minutes into a standard Bruce protocol, the patient experienced the same chest tightness, accompanied by 1-mm ST-segment depressions in leads II, III, and aVF. He was then referred to a cardiologist, who recommended catheterization.
Catheterization demonstrated a 95% stenosis of the right coronary artery with nonsignificant stenoses of the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries. A drug-eluting stent was placed in the right coronary artery, with no residual stenosis.
Did this intervention likely prevent an MI and perhaps save the man’s life?
HOW MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION HAPPENS
Understanding the pathogenesis of MI is critical to having realistic expectations of the benefits of stent placement.
Doctors often describe coronary atherosclerosis as a plumbing problem, where deposits of cholesterol and fat build up in arterial walls, clogging the pipes and eventually causing a heart attack. This analogy, which has been around since the 1950s, is easy to for patients to grasp and has been popularized in the press and internalized by the public—as one patient with a 95% stenosis put it, “I was 95% dead.” In that model, angioplasty and stenting can resolve the blockage and “fix” the problem, much as a plumber can clear your pipes with a Roto-Rooter.
Despite the visual appeal of this model,1 it doesn’t accurately convey what we know about the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Instead of a gradual buildup of fatty deposits, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles infiltrate arterial walls and trigger an inflammatory reaction as they are engulfed by macrophages, leading to a cascade of cytokines and recruitment of more inflammatory cells.2 This immune response can eventually cause the rupture of the plaque’s fibrous cap, triggering thrombosis and infarction, often at a site of insignificant stenosis.
In this new model, coronary artery disease is primarily a problem of inflammation distributed throughout the vasculature, rather than a mechanical problem localized to the site of a significant stenosis.
Significant stenosis does not equal unstable plaque
Not all plaques are equally likely to rupture. Stable plaques tend to be long-standing and calcified, with a thick fibrous cap. A stable plaque causing a 95% stenosis may cause symptoms with exertion, but it is unlikely to cause infarction.3 Conversely, rupture-prone plaques may cause little stenosis, but a large and dangerous plaque may be lurking beneath the thin fibrous cap.
Relying on angiography can be misleading. Treating all significant stenoses improves blood flow, but does not reduce the risk of infarction, because infarction most often occurs in areas where the lumen is not obstructed. A plaque causing only 30% stenosis can suddenly rupture, causing thrombosis and complete occlusion.
The current model explains why PCI is no better than optimal medical therapy (ie, risk factor modification, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, and a statin). Diet, exercise, smoking cessation, and statins target inflammatory processes and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, while aspirin prevents platelet aggregation, among other likely actions.
The model also explains why coronary artery bypass grafting reduces the risk of MI and death in patients with left main or 3-vessel disease. A patient with generalized coronary artery disease has multiple lesions, many of which do not cause significant stenoses. PCI corrects only a single stenosis, whereas coronary artery bypass grafting circumvents all the vulnerable plaques in a vessel.
THE LANDMARK COURAGE TRIAL
Published in 2007, the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial4 randomized more than 2,000 patients to receive either optimal medical therapy plus PCI or optimal medical therapy alone. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and nonfatal MI. Patients were followed for at least 3 years, and some for as long as 7 years.
There was an initial small upward spike in the primary outcome in the PCI arm due to periprocedural events. By 5 years, the outcomes of the 2 arms converged and then stayed the same for up to 15 years.5 The authors concluded that PCI conferred no benefit over optimal medical therapy in the risk of death or MI.
Some doctors dismiss the study because of its stringent entry criteria—of 35,539 patients assessed, only 3,071 met the eligibility criteria. However, the entry criteria were meant to identify patients most likely to benefit from PCI. Many patients who undergo PCI today would not have qualified for the study because they lack objective evidence of ischemia.6 To enroll, patients needed a proximal stenosis of at least 70% and objective evidence of ischemia or a coronary stenosis of more than 80% and classic angina. Exclusion criteria disqualified few patients: Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV angina (ie, angina evoked from minimal activity or at rest); a markedly positive stress test (substantial ST-segment depression or hypotension during stage I of the Bruce protocol); refractory heart failure or cardiogenic shock; an ejection fraction of less than 30%; revascularization within the past 6 months; and coronary anatomy unsuitable for PCI.
OTHER TRIALS SUPPORT COURAGE FINDINGS
Although COURAGE was hailed as a landmark trial, it largely supported the results of previous studies. A meta-analysis of PCI vs optimal medical therapy published in 2005 found no significant differences in death, cardiac death, MI, or nonfatal MI.7 MI was actually slightly more common in the PCI group due to the increased risk of MI during the periprocedural period.
Nor has the evidence from COURAGE discouraged additional studies of the same topic. Despite consistent findings that fit with our understanding of coronary disease as inflammation, we continue to conduct studies aimed at addressing significant stenosis, as if that was the problem. Thus, there have been studies of angioplasty alone, followed by studies of bare-metal stents and then drug-eluting stents.
In 2009, Trikalinos et al published a review of 61 randomized controlled trials comprising more than 25,000 patients with stable coronary disease and comparing medical therapy and angioplasty in its various forms over the previous 20 years.8 In all direct and indirect comparisons of PCI and medical therapy, there were no improvements in rates of death or MI.
Even so, the studies continue. The most recent “improvement” was the addition of fractional flow reserve, which served as the inclusion criterion for the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) trial.9 In that study, patients with at least 1 stenosis with a fractional flow reserve less than 0.80 were randomized to PCI plus medical therapy or to medical therapy alone. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, MI, and urgent revascularization. Unfortunately, the study was stopped early when the primary end point was met due to a reduction in the need for urgent revascularization. There was no reduction in the rate of MI (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.51–2.19).
The reduction in urgent revascularization has also been shown consistently in past studies, but this is the weakest outcome measure because it does not equate to a reduction in the rate of MI. There is no demonstrable harm to putting off stent placement, even in functionally significant arteries, and most patients do not require a stent, even in the future.
In summary, the primary benefit of getting a stent now is a reduced likelihood of needing one later.
PCI MAY IMPROVE ANGINA FASTER
Another important finding of the COURAGE trial was that PCI improved symptoms more than optimal medical therapy.10 This is not surprising, because angina is often a direct result of a significant stenosis. What was unexpected was that even after PCI, most patients were not symptom-free. At 1 month, significantly more PCI patients were angina-free (42%) than were medical patients (33%). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 9% or a number needed to treat of 11 to prevent 1 case of angina.
Patients in both groups improved over time, and after 3 years, the difference between the 2 groups was no longer significant: 59% in the PCI group vs 56% in the medical therapy group were angina-free.
A more recent study has raised the possibility that the improvement in angina with PCI is primarily a placebo effect. Researchers in the United Kingdom randomized patients with stable angina and at least a 70% stenosis of one vessel to either PCI or sham PCI, in which they threaded the catheter but did not deploy the stent.11 All patients received aggressive antianginal therapy before the procedure. At 6 weeks, there was improvement in angina in both groups, but no statistically significant difference between them in either exercise time or angina. Approximately half the patients in each group improved by at least 1 grade on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification, and more than 20% improved 2 grades.
This finding is not without precedent. Ligation of the internal mammary arteries, a popular treatment for angina in the 1950s, often provided dramatic relief of symptoms, until it was proven to be no better than a sham operation.12,13 More recently, a placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization also failed to show improvement over a sham treatment, despite promising results from a phase 1 trial.14 Together, these studies emphasize the subjective nature of angina as an outcome and call into question the routine use of PCI to relieve it.
PCI ENTAILS RISK
PCI entails a small but not inconsequential risk. During the procedure, 2% of patients develop bleeding or blood vessel damage, and another 1% die or have an MI or a stroke. In the first year after stent placement, 3% of patients have a bleeding event from the antiplatelet therapy needed for the stent, and an additional 2% develop a clot in the stent that leads to MI.15
INFORMED CONSENT IS CRITICAL
As demonstrated above, for patients with stable angina, the only evidence-based benefit of PCI over optimal medical therapy is that symptoms may respond faster. At the same time, there are costs and risks associated with the procedure. Because symptoms are subjective, patients should play a key role in deciding whether PCI is appropriate for them.
The American Medical Association states that a physician providing any treatment or procedure should disclose and discuss with patients the risks and benefits. Unfortunately, a substantial body of evidence demonstrates that this is not occurring in practice.
Patients and cardiologists have conflicting beliefs about PCI
Studies over the past 20 years demonstrate that patients with chronic stable angina consistently overestimate the benefits of PCI, with 71% to 88% believing that it will reduce their chance of death.16–19 Patients also understand that PCI can relieve their symptoms, though no study seems to have assessed the perceived magnitude of this benefit.
In contrast, when cardiologists were asked about the benefits their patients could expect from PCI, only 20% said that it would reduce mortality and 25% said it would prevent MI.18 These are still surprisingly high percentages, since the study was conducted after the COURAGE trial.
Nevertheless, these differences in perception show that cardiologists fail to successfully communicate the benefits of the procedure to their patients. Without complete information, patients cannot make informed decisions.
Cardiologists’ reasons for performing PCI
If PCI cannot improve hard outcomes like MI or death in stable coronary disease, why do cardiologists continue to perform it so frequently?
Soon after the COURAGE trial, Lin et al conducted focus groups with cardiologists to find out.20 Some said that they doubted the clinical trial evidence, given the reduction in the cardiac mortality rate over the past 30 years. Others remarked that their overriding goal is to stamp out ischemia, and that once a lesion is found by catheterization, one must proceed with PCI. This has been termed the “oculostenotic reflex,” ie, the interventionist sees coronary artery disease and immediately places a stent.
Atreya et al found objective evidence of this practice.21 In a 2016 study of 207 patients with obstructive lesions amenable to PCI, the only factors associated with medical management were those that increased the risk of the procedure: age, chronic kidney disease, distal location of the lesion, and type C lesions (the most difficult ones to treat by PCI). More important, evidence of ischemia, presence of angina, and being on optimal medical therapy or maximal antianginal therapy were not associated with PCI.
When surveyed, cardiologists offered reasons similar to those identified by Lin et al, including a positive stress test (70%) and significant myocardium at risk (50%).18 Optimal medical therapy failure was cited less often (40%). Over 30% identified relief of chest pain for patients who were not prescribed optimal medical therapy. Another 30% said that patient anxiety contributed to their decision, but patients who reported anxiety were not more likely to get PCI than those who did not.
True informed consent rarely occurs
Surveys of patients and recordings of doctor visits suggest that doctors often discuss the risks of the procedure but rarely accurately describe the benefits or mention alternative treatments, including optimal medical therapy.
Fowler et al22 surveyed 472 Medicare patients who had undergone PCI in the past year about their consent discussion, particularly regarding alternative options. Only 6% of patients recalled discussing medication as a serious option with their doctor.
In 2 published studies,23,24 we analyzed recorded conversations between doctors and patients in which angiography and PCI were discussed.
In a qualitative assessment of how cardiologists presented the rationale for PCI to patients,23 we observed that cardiologists gave an accurate presentation of the benefits in only 5% of cases. In 13% of the conversations the benefits were explicitly overstated (eg, “If you don’t do it [angiogram/PCI], what could happen? Well, you could…have a heart attack involving that area which can lead to a sudden death”). In another 35% of cases, physicians offered an implicit overstatement of the benefit by saying they could “fix” the problem (eg, “So that’s where we start thinking, Well maybe we better try to fix that [blockage]”), without specifically stating that fixing the problem would offer any benefit. Patients were left to fill in the blanks. Conversations frequently focused on the rationale for performing PCI (eg, ischemia on a stress test) and a description of the procedure, rather than on the risks and benefits.
In a quantitative study of the same data set, we assessed how often physicians addressed the 7 elements of informed decision-making as defined by Braddock et al.24
- Explaining the patient’s role in decision-making (ie, that the patient has a choice to make) was present in half of the conversations. Sometimes a doctor would simply say, “The next step is to perform catheterization.”
- Discussion of clinical issues (eg, having a blockage, stress test results) was performed in almost every case, demonstrating physicians’ comfort with that element.
- Discussing treatment alternatives occurred in only 1 in 4 conversations. This was more frequent than previously reported, and appeared most often when patients expressed hesitancy about proceeding to PCI.
- Discussing pros and cons of the alternatives was done in 42%.
- Uncertainty about the procedure (eg, that it might not relieve the angina) was expressed in only 10% of conversations.
- Assessment of patient understanding was done in 65% of cases. This included even minimal efforts (eg, “Do you have any questions?”). More advanced methods such as teach-back were never used.
- Exploration of patient preferences (eg, asking patients which treatment they prefer, or attempting to understand how angina affects a patient’s life) the final element, occurred in 73% of conversations.
Only 3% of the conversations contained all 7 elements. Even using a more relaxed definition of 3 critical elements (ie, discussing clinical issues, treatment alternatives, and pros and cons), only 13% of conversations included them all.
Discussion affects decisions
Informed decision-making is not only important because of its ethical implications. Offering patients more information was associated with their choosing not to have PCI. The probability of a patient undergoing PCI was negatively associated with 3 specific elements of informed decision-making. Patients were less likely to choose PCI if the patient’s role in decision-making was discussed (61% vs 86% chose PCI, P < .03); if alternatives were discussed (31% vs 89% chose PCI, P < .01); and if uncertainties were discussed (17% vs 80% chose PCI, P < .01).
There was also a linear relationship between the total number of elements discussed and the probability of choosing PCI: it ranged from 100% of patients choosing PCI when just 1 element was present to 3% of patients choosing PCI when all 7 elements were present. The relationship is not entirely causal, since doctors were more likely to talk about alternatives and risks if patients hesitated and raised questions. Cautious patients received more information.
From these observational studies, we know that physicians do not generally communicate the benefits of PCI, and patients make incorrect assumptions about the benefits they can expect. We know that those who receive more information are less likely to choose PCI, but what would happen if patients were randomly assigned to receive complete information?
An online survey
We conducted an online survey of more than 1,000 participants over age 50 who had never undergone PCI, asking them to imagine visiting a cardiologist after having a positive stress test for stable chest pain.25 Three intervention groups read different scenarios couched as information provided by their cardiologist:
- The “standard care” group received no specific information about the effects of PCI on the risk of myocardial infarction
- The “specific information” group was specifically told that PCI does not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction
- The “explanatory information” group was told how medications work and why PCI does not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction.
All 3 groups received information about the risks of PCI, its role in reducing angina, and the risks and benefits of optimal medical therapy.
After reading their scenario, all participants completed an identical questionnaire, which asked if they would opt for PCI, medical therapy, or both. Overall, 55% chose PCI, ranging from 70% in the standard care group to 46% in the group given explanatory information. Rates in the specific-information and explanatory-information groups were not statistically different from each other, but both were significantly different from that in the standard-care group. Interestingly, the more information patients were given about PCI, the more likely they were to choose optimal medical therapy.
After reading the scenario, participants were also asked if PCI would “prevent a heart attack.” Of those who received standard care, 71% endorsed that belief, which is remarkably similar to studies of real patients who have received standard care. In contrast, only 39% of those given specific information and 31% given explanatory information held that belief. Moreover, the belief that PCI prevented MI was the strongest predictor of choosing PCI (odds ratio 5.82, 95% confidence interval 4.13–8.26).25
Interestingly, 52% of the standard care group falsely remembered that the doctor had told them that PCI would prevent an MI, even though the doctor said nothing about it one way or the other. It appears that participants were projecting their own beliefs onto the encounter. This highlights the importance of providing full information to patients who are considering this procedure.
TOWARD SHARED DECISION-MAKING
Shared decision-making is a process in which physicians enter into a partnership with a patient, offer information, elicit the patient’s preferences, and then come to a decision in concert with the patient.
Although many decisions can and should involve elements of shared decision-making, the decision to proceed with PCI for stable angina is particularly well-suited to shared decision-making. This is because the benefit of PCI depends on the value a patient attaches to being free of angina sooner. Since there is no difference in the risk of MI or death, the patient must decide if the risks of the procedure and the inconvenience of taking dual antiplatelet therapy are worth the benefit of improving symptoms faster. Presumably, patients who have more severe symptoms or experienced side effects from antianginal therapy would be more likely to choose PCI.
Despite having substantial experience educating patients, most physicians are unfamiliar with the process of shared decision-making. In particular, the process of eliciting preferences is often overlooked.
To address this issue, researchers at the Mayo Clinic developed a decision aid that compares PCI plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone in an easily understandable information card.15 On one side, the 2 options are clearly stated, with the magnitude of symptom improvement over time graphically illustrated and the statement, “NO DIFFERENCE in heart attack or death,” prominently displayed. The back of the card discusses the risks of each option in easily understood tables.
The decision aid was compared with standard care in a randomized trial involving patients who were referred for catheterization and possible PCI.26 The decision aid improved patients’ overall knowledge about PCI. In particular, 60% of those who used the decision aid knew that PCI did not prevent death or MI vs 40% of usual-care patients—results similar to those of the online experiment.
Interestingly, the decision about whether to undergo PCI did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward more patients in the decision-aid group choosing medical therapy alone (53%) vs the standard-care patients (39%).
To understand why the decision aid did not make more of a difference, the investigators performed qualitative interviews of the cardiologists in the study.27 One theme was the timing of the intervention. Patients using the decision aid had already been referred for catheterization, and some felt the process should have occurred earlier. Engaging in shared decision-making with a general cardiologist before referral could help to improve the quality of patient decisions.
Cardiologists also noted the difficulty in changing their work flow to incorporate the decision aid. Although some embraced the idea of shared decision-making, others were concerned that many patients could not participate, and there was confusion about the difference between an educational tool, which could be used by a patient alone, and a decision aid, which is meant to generate discussion between the doctor and patient. Some expressed interest in using the tool in the future.
These findings serve to emphasize that providing information alone is not enough. If the physician does not “buy in” to the idea of shared decision-making, it will not occur.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
Based on the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease and the results of multiple randomized controlled trials, it is evident that PCI does not prevent heart attacks in patients with chronic stable angina. However, most patients who undergo PCI are unaware of this and therefore do not truly give informed consent. In the absence of explicit information to the contrary, most patients with stable angina assume that PCI prevents MI and thus are biased toward choosing PCI.
Even minimal amounts of explicit information can partially overcome that bias and influence decision-making. In particular, explaining why PCI does not prevent MI was the most effective means of overcoming the bias.
To this end, shared decision aids may help physicians to engage in shared decision-making. Shared decision-making is most likely to occur if physicians are trained in the concept of shared decision-making, are committed to practicing it, and can fit it into their work flow. Ideally, this would occur in the office of a general cardiologist before referral for PCI.
For those practicing in accountable-care organizations, Medicare has recently introduced the shared decision-making model for 6 preference-sensitive conditions, including stable ischemic heart disease. Participants in this program will have the opportunity to receive payments for shared decision-making services and to share in any savings that result from reduced use of resources. Use of these tools holds the promise for providing more patient-centered care at lower cost.
Multiple randomized controlled trials have compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs optimal medical therapy for patients with chronic stable angina. All have consistently shown that PCI does not reduce the risk of death or even myocardial infarction (MI) but that it may relieve angina temporarily. Nevertheless, PCI is still commonly performed for patients with stable coronary disease, often in the absence of angina, and patients mistakenly believe the procedure is life-saving. Cardiologists may not be aware of patients’ misperceptions, or worse, may encourage them. In either case, if patients do not understand the benefits of the procedure, they cannot give informed consent.
This article reviews the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease, evidence from clinical trials of the value of PCI for chronic stable angina, patient and physician perceptions of PCI, and ways to promote patient-centered, shared decision-making.
CLINICAL CASE: EXERTIONAL ANGINA
While climbing 4 flights of stairs, a 55-year-old man noticed tightness in his chest, which lasted for 5 minutes and resolved spontaneously. Several weeks later, when visiting his primary care physician, he mentioned the episode. He had had no symptoms in the interim, but the physician ordered an exercise stress test.
Six minutes into a standard Bruce protocol, the patient experienced the same chest tightness, accompanied by 1-mm ST-segment depressions in leads II, III, and aVF. He was then referred to a cardiologist, who recommended catheterization.
Catheterization demonstrated a 95% stenosis of the right coronary artery with nonsignificant stenoses of the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries. A drug-eluting stent was placed in the right coronary artery, with no residual stenosis.
Did this intervention likely prevent an MI and perhaps save the man’s life?
HOW MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION HAPPENS
Understanding the pathogenesis of MI is critical to having realistic expectations of the benefits of stent placement.
Doctors often describe coronary atherosclerosis as a plumbing problem, where deposits of cholesterol and fat build up in arterial walls, clogging the pipes and eventually causing a heart attack. This analogy, which has been around since the 1950s, is easy to for patients to grasp and has been popularized in the press and internalized by the public—as one patient with a 95% stenosis put it, “I was 95% dead.” In that model, angioplasty and stenting can resolve the blockage and “fix” the problem, much as a plumber can clear your pipes with a Roto-Rooter.
Despite the visual appeal of this model,1 it doesn’t accurately convey what we know about the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Instead of a gradual buildup of fatty deposits, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles infiltrate arterial walls and trigger an inflammatory reaction as they are engulfed by macrophages, leading to a cascade of cytokines and recruitment of more inflammatory cells.2 This immune response can eventually cause the rupture of the plaque’s fibrous cap, triggering thrombosis and infarction, often at a site of insignificant stenosis.
In this new model, coronary artery disease is primarily a problem of inflammation distributed throughout the vasculature, rather than a mechanical problem localized to the site of a significant stenosis.
Significant stenosis does not equal unstable plaque
Not all plaques are equally likely to rupture. Stable plaques tend to be long-standing and calcified, with a thick fibrous cap. A stable plaque causing a 95% stenosis may cause symptoms with exertion, but it is unlikely to cause infarction.3 Conversely, rupture-prone plaques may cause little stenosis, but a large and dangerous plaque may be lurking beneath the thin fibrous cap.
Relying on angiography can be misleading. Treating all significant stenoses improves blood flow, but does not reduce the risk of infarction, because infarction most often occurs in areas where the lumen is not obstructed. A plaque causing only 30% stenosis can suddenly rupture, causing thrombosis and complete occlusion.
The current model explains why PCI is no better than optimal medical therapy (ie, risk factor modification, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, and a statin). Diet, exercise, smoking cessation, and statins target inflammatory processes and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, while aspirin prevents platelet aggregation, among other likely actions.
The model also explains why coronary artery bypass grafting reduces the risk of MI and death in patients with left main or 3-vessel disease. A patient with generalized coronary artery disease has multiple lesions, many of which do not cause significant stenoses. PCI corrects only a single stenosis, whereas coronary artery bypass grafting circumvents all the vulnerable plaques in a vessel.
THE LANDMARK COURAGE TRIAL
Published in 2007, the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial4 randomized more than 2,000 patients to receive either optimal medical therapy plus PCI or optimal medical therapy alone. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and nonfatal MI. Patients were followed for at least 3 years, and some for as long as 7 years.
There was an initial small upward spike in the primary outcome in the PCI arm due to periprocedural events. By 5 years, the outcomes of the 2 arms converged and then stayed the same for up to 15 years.5 The authors concluded that PCI conferred no benefit over optimal medical therapy in the risk of death or MI.
Some doctors dismiss the study because of its stringent entry criteria—of 35,539 patients assessed, only 3,071 met the eligibility criteria. However, the entry criteria were meant to identify patients most likely to benefit from PCI. Many patients who undergo PCI today would not have qualified for the study because they lack objective evidence of ischemia.6 To enroll, patients needed a proximal stenosis of at least 70% and objective evidence of ischemia or a coronary stenosis of more than 80% and classic angina. Exclusion criteria disqualified few patients: Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV angina (ie, angina evoked from minimal activity or at rest); a markedly positive stress test (substantial ST-segment depression or hypotension during stage I of the Bruce protocol); refractory heart failure or cardiogenic shock; an ejection fraction of less than 30%; revascularization within the past 6 months; and coronary anatomy unsuitable for PCI.
OTHER TRIALS SUPPORT COURAGE FINDINGS
Although COURAGE was hailed as a landmark trial, it largely supported the results of previous studies. A meta-analysis of PCI vs optimal medical therapy published in 2005 found no significant differences in death, cardiac death, MI, or nonfatal MI.7 MI was actually slightly more common in the PCI group due to the increased risk of MI during the periprocedural period.
Nor has the evidence from COURAGE discouraged additional studies of the same topic. Despite consistent findings that fit with our understanding of coronary disease as inflammation, we continue to conduct studies aimed at addressing significant stenosis, as if that was the problem. Thus, there have been studies of angioplasty alone, followed by studies of bare-metal stents and then drug-eluting stents.
In 2009, Trikalinos et al published a review of 61 randomized controlled trials comprising more than 25,000 patients with stable coronary disease and comparing medical therapy and angioplasty in its various forms over the previous 20 years.8 In all direct and indirect comparisons of PCI and medical therapy, there were no improvements in rates of death or MI.
Even so, the studies continue. The most recent “improvement” was the addition of fractional flow reserve, which served as the inclusion criterion for the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2 (FAME 2) trial.9 In that study, patients with at least 1 stenosis with a fractional flow reserve less than 0.80 were randomized to PCI plus medical therapy or to medical therapy alone. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause, MI, and urgent revascularization. Unfortunately, the study was stopped early when the primary end point was met due to a reduction in the need for urgent revascularization. There was no reduction in the rate of MI (hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.51–2.19).
The reduction in urgent revascularization has also been shown consistently in past studies, but this is the weakest outcome measure because it does not equate to a reduction in the rate of MI. There is no demonstrable harm to putting off stent placement, even in functionally significant arteries, and most patients do not require a stent, even in the future.
In summary, the primary benefit of getting a stent now is a reduced likelihood of needing one later.
PCI MAY IMPROVE ANGINA FASTER
Another important finding of the COURAGE trial was that PCI improved symptoms more than optimal medical therapy.10 This is not surprising, because angina is often a direct result of a significant stenosis. What was unexpected was that even after PCI, most patients were not symptom-free. At 1 month, significantly more PCI patients were angina-free (42%) than were medical patients (33%). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 9% or a number needed to treat of 11 to prevent 1 case of angina.
Patients in both groups improved over time, and after 3 years, the difference between the 2 groups was no longer significant: 59% in the PCI group vs 56% in the medical therapy group were angina-free.
A more recent study has raised the possibility that the improvement in angina with PCI is primarily a placebo effect. Researchers in the United Kingdom randomized patients with stable angina and at least a 70% stenosis of one vessel to either PCI or sham PCI, in which they threaded the catheter but did not deploy the stent.11 All patients received aggressive antianginal therapy before the procedure. At 6 weeks, there was improvement in angina in both groups, but no statistically significant difference between them in either exercise time or angina. Approximately half the patients in each group improved by at least 1 grade on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina classification, and more than 20% improved 2 grades.
This finding is not without precedent. Ligation of the internal mammary arteries, a popular treatment for angina in the 1950s, often provided dramatic relief of symptoms, until it was proven to be no better than a sham operation.12,13 More recently, a placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization also failed to show improvement over a sham treatment, despite promising results from a phase 1 trial.14 Together, these studies emphasize the subjective nature of angina as an outcome and call into question the routine use of PCI to relieve it.
PCI ENTAILS RISK
PCI entails a small but not inconsequential risk. During the procedure, 2% of patients develop bleeding or blood vessel damage, and another 1% die or have an MI or a stroke. In the first year after stent placement, 3% of patients have a bleeding event from the antiplatelet therapy needed for the stent, and an additional 2% develop a clot in the stent that leads to MI.15
INFORMED CONSENT IS CRITICAL
As demonstrated above, for patients with stable angina, the only evidence-based benefit of PCI over optimal medical therapy is that symptoms may respond faster. At the same time, there are costs and risks associated with the procedure. Because symptoms are subjective, patients should play a key role in deciding whether PCI is appropriate for them.
The American Medical Association states that a physician providing any treatment or procedure should disclose and discuss with patients the risks and benefits. Unfortunately, a substantial body of evidence demonstrates that this is not occurring in practice.
Patients and cardiologists have conflicting beliefs about PCI
Studies over the past 20 years demonstrate that patients with chronic stable angina consistently overestimate the benefits of PCI, with 71% to 88% believing that it will reduce their chance of death.16–19 Patients also understand that PCI can relieve their symptoms, though no study seems to have assessed the perceived magnitude of this benefit.
In contrast, when cardiologists were asked about the benefits their patients could expect from PCI, only 20% said that it would reduce mortality and 25% said it would prevent MI.18 These are still surprisingly high percentages, since the study was conducted after the COURAGE trial.
Nevertheless, these differences in perception show that cardiologists fail to successfully communicate the benefits of the procedure to their patients. Without complete information, patients cannot make informed decisions.
Cardiologists’ reasons for performing PCI
If PCI cannot improve hard outcomes like MI or death in stable coronary disease, why do cardiologists continue to perform it so frequently?
Soon after the COURAGE trial, Lin et al conducted focus groups with cardiologists to find out.20 Some said that they doubted the clinical trial evidence, given the reduction in the cardiac mortality rate over the past 30 years. Others remarked that their overriding goal is to stamp out ischemia, and that once a lesion is found by catheterization, one must proceed with PCI. This has been termed the “oculostenotic reflex,” ie, the interventionist sees coronary artery disease and immediately places a stent.
Atreya et al found objective evidence of this practice.21 In a 2016 study of 207 patients with obstructive lesions amenable to PCI, the only factors associated with medical management were those that increased the risk of the procedure: age, chronic kidney disease, distal location of the lesion, and type C lesions (the most difficult ones to treat by PCI). More important, evidence of ischemia, presence of angina, and being on optimal medical therapy or maximal antianginal therapy were not associated with PCI.
When surveyed, cardiologists offered reasons similar to those identified by Lin et al, including a positive stress test (70%) and significant myocardium at risk (50%).18 Optimal medical therapy failure was cited less often (40%). Over 30% identified relief of chest pain for patients who were not prescribed optimal medical therapy. Another 30% said that patient anxiety contributed to their decision, but patients who reported anxiety were not more likely to get PCI than those who did not.
True informed consent rarely occurs
Surveys of patients and recordings of doctor visits suggest that doctors often discuss the risks of the procedure but rarely accurately describe the benefits or mention alternative treatments, including optimal medical therapy.
Fowler et al22 surveyed 472 Medicare patients who had undergone PCI in the past year about their consent discussion, particularly regarding alternative options. Only 6% of patients recalled discussing medication as a serious option with their doctor.
In 2 published studies,23,24 we analyzed recorded conversations between doctors and patients in which angiography and PCI were discussed.
In a qualitative assessment of how cardiologists presented the rationale for PCI to patients,23 we observed that cardiologists gave an accurate presentation of the benefits in only 5% of cases. In 13% of the conversations the benefits were explicitly overstated (eg, “If you don’t do it [angiogram/PCI], what could happen? Well, you could…have a heart attack involving that area which can lead to a sudden death”). In another 35% of cases, physicians offered an implicit overstatement of the benefit by saying they could “fix” the problem (eg, “So that’s where we start thinking, Well maybe we better try to fix that [blockage]”), without specifically stating that fixing the problem would offer any benefit. Patients were left to fill in the blanks. Conversations frequently focused on the rationale for performing PCI (eg, ischemia on a stress test) and a description of the procedure, rather than on the risks and benefits.
In a quantitative study of the same data set, we assessed how often physicians addressed the 7 elements of informed decision-making as defined by Braddock et al.24
- Explaining the patient’s role in decision-making (ie, that the patient has a choice to make) was present in half of the conversations. Sometimes a doctor would simply say, “The next step is to perform catheterization.”
- Discussion of clinical issues (eg, having a blockage, stress test results) was performed in almost every case, demonstrating physicians’ comfort with that element.
- Discussing treatment alternatives occurred in only 1 in 4 conversations. This was more frequent than previously reported, and appeared most often when patients expressed hesitancy about proceeding to PCI.
- Discussing pros and cons of the alternatives was done in 42%.
- Uncertainty about the procedure (eg, that it might not relieve the angina) was expressed in only 10% of conversations.
- Assessment of patient understanding was done in 65% of cases. This included even minimal efforts (eg, “Do you have any questions?”). More advanced methods such as teach-back were never used.
- Exploration of patient preferences (eg, asking patients which treatment they prefer, or attempting to understand how angina affects a patient’s life) the final element, occurred in 73% of conversations.
Only 3% of the conversations contained all 7 elements. Even using a more relaxed definition of 3 critical elements (ie, discussing clinical issues, treatment alternatives, and pros and cons), only 13% of conversations included them all.
Discussion affects decisions
Informed decision-making is not only important because of its ethical implications. Offering patients more information was associated with their choosing not to have PCI. The probability of a patient undergoing PCI was negatively associated with 3 specific elements of informed decision-making. Patients were less likely to choose PCI if the patient’s role in decision-making was discussed (61% vs 86% chose PCI, P < .03); if alternatives were discussed (31% vs 89% chose PCI, P < .01); and if uncertainties were discussed (17% vs 80% chose PCI, P < .01).
There was also a linear relationship between the total number of elements discussed and the probability of choosing PCI: it ranged from 100% of patients choosing PCI when just 1 element was present to 3% of patients choosing PCI when all 7 elements were present. The relationship is not entirely causal, since doctors were more likely to talk about alternatives and risks if patients hesitated and raised questions. Cautious patients received more information.
From these observational studies, we know that physicians do not generally communicate the benefits of PCI, and patients make incorrect assumptions about the benefits they can expect. We know that those who receive more information are less likely to choose PCI, but what would happen if patients were randomly assigned to receive complete information?
An online survey
We conducted an online survey of more than 1,000 participants over age 50 who had never undergone PCI, asking them to imagine visiting a cardiologist after having a positive stress test for stable chest pain.25 Three intervention groups read different scenarios couched as information provided by their cardiologist:
- The “standard care” group received no specific information about the effects of PCI on the risk of myocardial infarction
- The “specific information” group was specifically told that PCI does not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction
- The “explanatory information” group was told how medications work and why PCI does not reduce the risk of myocardial infarction.
All 3 groups received information about the risks of PCI, its role in reducing angina, and the risks and benefits of optimal medical therapy.
After reading their scenario, all participants completed an identical questionnaire, which asked if they would opt for PCI, medical therapy, or both. Overall, 55% chose PCI, ranging from 70% in the standard care group to 46% in the group given explanatory information. Rates in the specific-information and explanatory-information groups were not statistically different from each other, but both were significantly different from that in the standard-care group. Interestingly, the more information patients were given about PCI, the more likely they were to choose optimal medical therapy.
After reading the scenario, participants were also asked if PCI would “prevent a heart attack.” Of those who received standard care, 71% endorsed that belief, which is remarkably similar to studies of real patients who have received standard care. In contrast, only 39% of those given specific information and 31% given explanatory information held that belief. Moreover, the belief that PCI prevented MI was the strongest predictor of choosing PCI (odds ratio 5.82, 95% confidence interval 4.13–8.26).25
Interestingly, 52% of the standard care group falsely remembered that the doctor had told them that PCI would prevent an MI, even though the doctor said nothing about it one way or the other. It appears that participants were projecting their own beliefs onto the encounter. This highlights the importance of providing full information to patients who are considering this procedure.
TOWARD SHARED DECISION-MAKING
Shared decision-making is a process in which physicians enter into a partnership with a patient, offer information, elicit the patient’s preferences, and then come to a decision in concert with the patient.
Although many decisions can and should involve elements of shared decision-making, the decision to proceed with PCI for stable angina is particularly well-suited to shared decision-making. This is because the benefit of PCI depends on the value a patient attaches to being free of angina sooner. Since there is no difference in the risk of MI or death, the patient must decide if the risks of the procedure and the inconvenience of taking dual antiplatelet therapy are worth the benefit of improving symptoms faster. Presumably, patients who have more severe symptoms or experienced side effects from antianginal therapy would be more likely to choose PCI.
Despite having substantial experience educating patients, most physicians are unfamiliar with the process of shared decision-making. In particular, the process of eliciting preferences is often overlooked.
To address this issue, researchers at the Mayo Clinic developed a decision aid that compares PCI plus optimal medical therapy vs optimal medical therapy alone in an easily understandable information card.15 On one side, the 2 options are clearly stated, with the magnitude of symptom improvement over time graphically illustrated and the statement, “NO DIFFERENCE in heart attack or death,” prominently displayed. The back of the card discusses the risks of each option in easily understood tables.
The decision aid was compared with standard care in a randomized trial involving patients who were referred for catheterization and possible PCI.26 The decision aid improved patients’ overall knowledge about PCI. In particular, 60% of those who used the decision aid knew that PCI did not prevent death or MI vs 40% of usual-care patients—results similar to those of the online experiment.
Interestingly, the decision about whether to undergo PCI did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, although there was a trend toward more patients in the decision-aid group choosing medical therapy alone (53%) vs the standard-care patients (39%).
To understand why the decision aid did not make more of a difference, the investigators performed qualitative interviews of the cardiologists in the study.27 One theme was the timing of the intervention. Patients using the decision aid had already been referred for catheterization, and some felt the process should have occurred earlier. Engaging in shared decision-making with a general cardiologist before referral could help to improve the quality of patient decisions.
Cardiologists also noted the difficulty in changing their work flow to incorporate the decision aid. Although some embraced the idea of shared decision-making, others were concerned that many patients could not participate, and there was confusion about the difference between an educational tool, which could be used by a patient alone, and a decision aid, which is meant to generate discussion between the doctor and patient. Some expressed interest in using the tool in the future.
These findings serve to emphasize that providing information alone is not enough. If the physician does not “buy in” to the idea of shared decision-making, it will not occur.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
Based on the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease and the results of multiple randomized controlled trials, it is evident that PCI does not prevent heart attacks in patients with chronic stable angina. However, most patients who undergo PCI are unaware of this and therefore do not truly give informed consent. In the absence of explicit information to the contrary, most patients with stable angina assume that PCI prevents MI and thus are biased toward choosing PCI.
Even minimal amounts of explicit information can partially overcome that bias and influence decision-making. In particular, explaining why PCI does not prevent MI was the most effective means of overcoming the bias.
To this end, shared decision aids may help physicians to engage in shared decision-making. Shared decision-making is most likely to occur if physicians are trained in the concept of shared decision-making, are committed to practicing it, and can fit it into their work flow. Ideally, this would occur in the office of a general cardiologist before referral for PCI.
For those practicing in accountable-care organizations, Medicare has recently introduced the shared decision-making model for 6 preference-sensitive conditions, including stable ischemic heart disease. Participants in this program will have the opportunity to receive payments for shared decision-making services and to share in any savings that result from reduced use of resources. Use of these tools holds the promise for providing more patient-centered care at lower cost.
- Jones DS. Visions of a cure. Visualization, clinical trials, and controversies in cardiac therapeutics, 1968–1998. Isis 2000; 91:504–541.
- Hansson G. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1685–1695.
- Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:226–235.
- Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1503–1516.
- Sedlis SP, Hartigan PM, Teo KK, et al. Effect of PCI on long-term survival in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1937–1946.
- Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, Malenka DJ, Vittinghoff E, Redberg RF. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2008; 300:1765–1773.
- Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005; 111:2906–2912.
- Trikalinos TA, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Tatsioni A, Nallamothu BK, Kent DM. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373:911–918.
- De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:991–1001.
- Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:677–687.
- Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi H-M, et al, on behalf of the ORBITA Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Published online November 2, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9. Accessed November 10, 2017.
- Cobb LA, Thomas GI, Dillard DH, et al. An evaluation of internal mammary-artery ligation by a double-blind technic. N Engl J Med 1959; 260:1115–1118.
- Dimond EG, Fittle F, Crockett JE. Comparison of internal mammary artery ligation and sham operation for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1960; 5:483-486.
- Leon MB, Kornowski R, Downey WE, et al. A blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization to improve angina symptoms in patients with severe coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:1812–1819.
- Coylewright M, Shepel K, Leblanc A, et al. Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice. PLoS One 2012; 7:e49827.
- Holmboe ES, Fiellin DA, Cusanelli E, Remetz M, Krumholz HM. Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15:632–637.
- Kee F, McDonald P, Gaffney B. Risks and benefits of coronary angioplasty: the patients perspective: a preliminary study. Qual Health Care 1997; 6:131–139.
- Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, et al. Patients’ and cardiologists’ perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153:307–313.
- Whittle J, Conigliaro J, Good CB, Kelley ME, Skanderson M. Understanding of the benefits of coronary revascularization procedures among patients who are offered such procedures. Am Heart J 2007; 154:662–668.
- Lin GA, Dudley RA, Redberg RF. Cardiologists’ use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167:1604–1609.
- Atreya AR, Sivalingam SK, Arora S, et al. Predictors of medical management in patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization for chronic ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol 2016; 39:207–214.
- Fowler FJ Jr, Gallagher PM, Bynum JP, Barry MJ, Lucas FL, Skinner JS. Decision-making process reported by Medicare patients who had coronary artery stenting or surgery for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:911–916.
- Goff SL, Mazor KM, Ting HH, Kleppel R, Rothberg MB. How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:1614–1621.
- Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999; 282:2313–2320.
- Rothberg MB, Scherer L, Kashef MA, et al. The effect of information presentation on beliefs about the benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:1623–1629.
- Coylewright M, Dick S, Zmolek B, et al. PCI choice decision aid for stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016; 9:767–776.
- Coylewright M, O’Neill ES, Dick S, Grande SW. PCI choice: cardiovascular clinicians’ perceptions of shared decision making in stable coronary artery disease. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100:1136–1143.
- Jones DS. Visions of a cure. Visualization, clinical trials, and controversies in cardiac therapeutics, 1968–1998. Isis 2000; 91:504–541.
- Hansson G. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1685–1695.
- Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:226–235.
- Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1503–1516.
- Sedlis SP, Hartigan PM, Teo KK, et al. Effect of PCI on long-term survival in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 2015; 373:1937–1946.
- Lin GA, Dudley RA, Lucas FL, Malenka DJ, Vittinghoff E, Redberg RF. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2008; 300:1765–1773.
- Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005; 111:2906–2912.
- Trikalinos TA, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Tatsioni A, Nallamothu BK, Kent DM. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2009; 373:911–918.
- De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:991–1001.
- Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P, et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008; 359:677–687.
- Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi H-M, et al, on behalf of the ORBITA Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. Published online November 2, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9. Accessed November 10, 2017.
- Cobb LA, Thomas GI, Dillard DH, et al. An evaluation of internal mammary-artery ligation by a double-blind technic. N Engl J Med 1959; 260:1115–1118.
- Dimond EG, Fittle F, Crockett JE. Comparison of internal mammary artery ligation and sham operation for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1960; 5:483-486.
- Leon MB, Kornowski R, Downey WE, et al. A blinded, randomized placebo-controlled trial of percutaneous laser myocardial revascularization to improve angina symptoms in patients with severe coronary disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:1812–1819.
- Coylewright M, Shepel K, Leblanc A, et al. Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice. PLoS One 2012; 7:e49827.
- Holmboe ES, Fiellin DA, Cusanelli E, Remetz M, Krumholz HM. Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Gen Intern Med 2000; 15:632–637.
- Kee F, McDonald P, Gaffney B. Risks and benefits of coronary angioplasty: the patients perspective: a preliminary study. Qual Health Care 1997; 6:131–139.
- Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, et al. Patients’ and cardiologists’ perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med 2010; 153:307–313.
- Whittle J, Conigliaro J, Good CB, Kelley ME, Skanderson M. Understanding of the benefits of coronary revascularization procedures among patients who are offered such procedures. Am Heart J 2007; 154:662–668.
- Lin GA, Dudley RA, Redberg RF. Cardiologists’ use of percutaneous coronary interventions for stable coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167:1604–1609.
- Atreya AR, Sivalingam SK, Arora S, et al. Predictors of medical management in patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization for chronic ischemic heart disease. Clin Cardiol 2016; 39:207–214.
- Fowler FJ Jr, Gallagher PM, Bynum JP, Barry MJ, Lucas FL, Skinner JS. Decision-making process reported by Medicare patients who had coronary artery stenting or surgery for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:911–916.
- Goff SL, Mazor KM, Ting HH, Kleppel R, Rothberg MB. How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:1614–1621.
- Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 1999; 282:2313–2320.
- Rothberg MB, Scherer L, Kashef MA, et al. The effect of information presentation on beliefs about the benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:1623–1629.
- Coylewright M, Dick S, Zmolek B, et al. PCI choice decision aid for stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016; 9:767–776.
- Coylewright M, O’Neill ES, Dick S, Grande SW. PCI choice: cardiovascular clinicians’ perceptions of shared decision making in stable coronary artery disease. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100:1136–1143.
KEY POINTS
- For patients with stable angina pectoris, PCI does not prevent myocardial infarction or death.
- Optimal medical therapy with aspirin and a statin can reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and should be recommended for all patients with stable angina, regardless of whether they undergo PCI.
- PCI improves symptoms of angina faster than medical therapy alone, but more than half of patients will be free of angina in about 2 years with either option.
- In the absence of information to the contrary, most patients and some doctors assume that PCI is life-saving and are biased towards choosing it. As a result, patients are rarely able to give true informed consent to undergo PCI.