Rebat M. Halder, MD

Case Report

A 57-year-old black woman with a history of dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, diastolic congestive heart failure, and chronic bronchitis was admitted to Howard University Hospital (Washington, DC) for acute chest pain and shortness of breath. During her hospital stay the dermatology team was consulted for evaluation of two 1.6-cm teardrop-shaped, yellow-white-chalky plaques noted in the center of an atrophic, hyperpigmented, shiny, contracted split-thickness skin graft (STSG) on the right posterior forearm (Figure 1). Twenty years prior, the patient received STSGs on the right and left forearm secondary to caustic burns. Two months before the current admission she noticed 2 adjacent teardrop-shaped white plaques within the center of the STSG on the right forearm. At a 3-month follow-up, she had developed more lesions within both graft sites of the bilateral forearm. There was no notable pruritus associated with the lesions.

A 4-mm punch biopsy showed an orthokeratotic plug with basophilic inflammatory debris adjacent to acanthotic epidermis, necrotic basophilic debris at the superficial dermis with epidermal canals extending from the base of the lesion superiorly, and transepidermal elimination of elastic fibers (Figure 2A). A Verhoeff-van Gieson stain revealed the necrotic basophilic debris located in the superficial dermis admixed with a cluster of black wavy elastic fibers establishing the identity of the perforating substance (Figure 2B). Masson trichrome stain revealed loss of collagen structure within the aggregate of elastic fibers adjacent to the epidermis and no collagen within epidermal canals (Figure 2C). These histopathologic findings together with the clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of acquired perforating dermatosis (APD).

Comment

Presentation
Acquired perforating dermatosis is a dermatologic condition characterized by multiple pruritic, dome-shaped papules and plaques with central keratotic plugs giving a craterlike appearance.^1-4 A green-brown or black crust with an erythematous border typically surrounds the primary lesions.⁴ Acquired perforating dermatosis favors a distribution over the trunk, gluteal region, and the extensor surfaces of the upper and lower extremities. Palmoplantar, intertriginous, and mucous membrane regions typically are spared.⁴ Occasionally, APD may present as generalized nodules and papules. Our case consisting of lesions that were localized to STSGs on the forearms supports the typical distribution; however, the presentation of APD occurring within a skin graft is unique.

From an epidemiologic standpoint, APD is more likely to affect men than women (1.5:1 ratio). Additionally, APD’s affected age range is 29 to 96 years (mean, 56.8 years),⁵ which is consistent with our patient’s age. Acquired perforating dermatosis has no racial predilection, though there is a predominance among black patients with concomitant chronic renal failure, as seen in our patient.³

Pathogenesis
The etiology of APD remains unknown.⁶ Some believe that the uremic or calcium deposits on the skin of patients with chronic kidney disease may trigger chronic pruritus, leading to epithelial hyperplasia and the development of perforating lesions.^1,3 A prominent theory in the literature is that superficial trauma, such as scratching, induces necrosis of tissue, facilitating transepidermal elimination of connective tissue components.⁷ The Köbner phenomenon, which can easily be induced by scratching the skin, supports this idea.⁸ Fujimoto et al⁹ suggested that scratching exposes keratinocytes to advanced glycation end product–modified extracellular matrix proteins, particularly types I and III collagen. This exposure leads to the terminal differentiation of keratinocytes with the advanced glycation end receptor (CD36) followed by the upward movement of keratinocytes with glycated collagen. Others postulate fibronectin, involved in epidermal cell signaling, locomotion, and differentiation, is an antigenic trigger because patients with DM and uremia have increased levels of fibronectin in the serum and at sites of perforating skin lesions.¹⁰

Diseases Associated With APD
Acquired perforating dermatosis is an umbrella term for perforating disease found in adults. It is associated with systemic diseases, such as DM and pruritus of renal failure.¹¹ Our patient had both dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease and DM. Acquired perforating dermatosis is observed in 4.5% to 11% of patients on hemodialysis^12,13; however, APD may occur prior to or in the absence of dialysis.³ Other examples of systemic conditions associated with APD include obstructive uropathy, chronic nephritis, anuria, and hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Koebnerization also may trigger lesions to manifest in a linear pattern after localized trauma to the skin.⁷ Acquired perforating dermatosis is associated with other types of trauma, such as healing herpes zoster, or following exposure to drugs, such as tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, bevacizumab, telaprevir, sorafenib, sirolimus, and indinavir.^14-16 Rarely, there have been associations with a history of insect bites, scabies, lymphoma, and hepatobiliary disease.^1-3

Histopathology
Acquired perforating dermatosis is classified as a perforating disease, along with reactive perforating collagenosis, elastosis perforans serpiginosa (EPS), perforating folliculitis, and perforating calcific elastosis. Perforating diseases are histologically characterized by the transepidermal penetration and elimination of altered connective tissue and inflammatory cells.⁵ Each disease differs based on their clinical and histological characteristics.

Histologic sections of APD show a plug of crusting or hyperkeratosis with variable parakeratosis, acanthosis, and occasional dyskeratotic keratinocytes. In the dermis, aggregates of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, or multinucleated giant cells may be found.¹⁷ The histologic findings vary depending on the stage of evolution of the individual lesion. Early lesions show a concave depression with acanthosis, vacuolation of basal keratinocytes, and dermal inflammation.⁴ Additionally, transepidermal channels filled with keratin, pyknotic nuclear debris, inflammatory cells, elastin, or collagen can be noted.³ Over time, the elastic fibers, as detected by the Verhoeff-van Gieson stain, dissipate and the collagen acquires a basophilic staining. Adjacent to the channels, the basement membrane remains intact in early lesions but later shows discontinuities and electron-dense fibrinlike material.³ Occasionally, amorphous degenerated material within the perforations is the major histologic finding.¹¹ Usually, the material cannot be clearly identified as collagen or elastin, but sometimes both are present.

In our case, we identified elastin as the perforating substance, which is less common than collagen, the typical perforating substance in APD. Elastin has occasionally been seen to serve as the only perforating substance from APD lesions among patients. Abe et al¹⁸ reported that the biopsy of a Japanese patient with keratotic follicular papules and serpiginous-arranged papules demonstrated elimination of atypical elastin fibers from the transepidermal channels. This patient was diagnosed with APD as well as EPS and perforating folliculitis based on the clinical presentation.¹⁸ Kim et al¹⁹ studied 30 Korean patients with APD. One had serpiginous hyperkeratotic plaques along the upper extremity and trunk that revealed transepidermal channels containing coarse elastic fibers and basophilic debris; however, due to the serpiginous morphology of lesions, both Abe et al¹⁸ and Kim et al¹⁹ favored a diagnosis of acquired EPS. Saray et al²⁰ conducted a retrospective study of 22 Turkish patients with APD; 1 patient had a painful hyperkeratotic papule on the auricle that on histopathology showed degenerated elastin perforating through the keratotic plug, features similar to our case.

Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnoses include perforating diseases^14,19 as well as other disorders that exhibit the Köbner phenomenon, such as psoriasis, lichen planus, and verruca vulgaris.^21,22 Also, it is not uncommon for patients with APD to have coexisting folliculitis or prurigo nodularis.²²

Treatment
Management is focused on treating the symptoms. For pruritus, sedating antihistamines and other antipruritic agents are efficacious.²³ Topical, intra-lesional, or systemic corticosteroids and topical retinoids have shown variable resolution in APD lesions.²⁴ Some case reports describe topical menthol, salicylic acid, sulfur, benzoyl peroxide, systemic antibiotics (eg, clindamycin, doxycycline), and allopurinol for elevated uric acid levels as effective treatment methods.⁶ Narrowband UVB phototherapy is beneficial for APD and renal disease.^25,26 Renal transplantation has been curative for some patients with APD.²⁷ Given that our patient’s lesions were asymptomatic, no treatment was offered at the time.

Conclusion

Our patient presented with APD localized exclusively to the site of a skin graft, and histologic examination identified elastin as the primary perforating substance. A medical history of DM and chronic kidney disease predisposes patients to APD. This case suggests that skin graft sites may be predisposed to the development of APD.

Case Report

A 57-year-old black woman with a history of dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, diastolic congestive heart failure, and chronic bronchitis was admitted to Howard University Hospital (Washington, DC) for acute chest pain and shortness of breath. During her hospital stay the dermatology team was consulted for evaluation of two 1.6-cm teardrop-shaped, yellow-white-chalky plaques noted in the center of an atrophic, hyperpigmented, shiny, contracted split-thickness skin graft (STSG) on the right posterior forearm (Figure 1). Twenty years prior, the patient received STSGs on the right and left forearm secondary to caustic burns. Two months before the current admission she noticed 2 adjacent teardrop-shaped white plaques within the center of the STSG on the right forearm. At a 3-month follow-up, she had developed more lesions within both graft sites of the bilateral forearm. There was no notable pruritus associated with the lesions.

A 4-mm punch biopsy showed an orthokeratotic plug with basophilic inflammatory debris adjacent to acanthotic epidermis, necrotic basophilic debris at the superficial dermis with epidermal canals extending from the base of the lesion superiorly, and transepidermal elimination of elastic fibers (Figure 2A). A Verhoeff-van Gieson stain revealed the necrotic basophilic debris located in the superficial dermis admixed with a cluster of black wavy elastic fibers establishing the identity of the perforating substance (Figure 2B). Masson trichrome stain revealed loss of collagen structure within the aggregate of elastic fibers adjacent to the epidermis and no collagen within epidermal canals (Figure 2C). These histopathologic findings together with the clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of acquired perforating dermatosis (APD).

Comment

Presentation
Acquired perforating dermatosis is a dermatologic condition characterized by multiple pruritic, dome-shaped papules and plaques with central keratotic plugs giving a craterlike appearance.^1-4 A green-brown or black crust with an erythematous border typically surrounds the primary lesions.⁴ Acquired perforating dermatosis favors a distribution over the trunk, gluteal region, and the extensor surfaces of the upper and lower extremities. Palmoplantar, intertriginous, and mucous membrane regions typically are spared.⁴ Occasionally, APD may present as generalized nodules and papules. Our case consisting of lesions that were localized to STSGs on the forearms supports the typical distribution; however, the presentation of APD occurring within a skin graft is unique.

From an epidemiologic standpoint, APD is more likely to affect men than women (1.5:1 ratio). Additionally, APD’s affected age range is 29 to 96 years (mean, 56.8 years),⁵ which is consistent with our patient’s age. Acquired perforating dermatosis has no racial predilection, though there is a predominance among black patients with concomitant chronic renal failure, as seen in our patient.³

Pathogenesis
The etiology of APD remains unknown.⁶ Some believe that the uremic or calcium deposits on the skin of patients with chronic kidney disease may trigger chronic pruritus, leading to epithelial hyperplasia and the development of perforating lesions.^1,3 A prominent theory in the literature is that superficial trauma, such as scratching, induces necrosis of tissue, facilitating transepidermal elimination of connective tissue components.⁷ The Köbner phenomenon, which can easily be induced by scratching the skin, supports this idea.⁸ Fujimoto et al⁹ suggested that scratching exposes keratinocytes to advanced glycation end product–modified extracellular matrix proteins, particularly types I and III collagen. This exposure leads to the terminal differentiation of keratinocytes with the advanced glycation end receptor (CD36) followed by the upward movement of keratinocytes with glycated collagen. Others postulate fibronectin, involved in epidermal cell signaling, locomotion, and differentiation, is an antigenic trigger because patients with DM and uremia have increased levels of fibronectin in the serum and at sites of perforating skin lesions.¹⁰

Diseases Associated With APD
Acquired perforating dermatosis is an umbrella term for perforating disease found in adults. It is associated with systemic diseases, such as DM and pruritus of renal failure.¹¹ Our patient had both dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease and DM. Acquired perforating dermatosis is observed in 4.5% to 11% of patients on hemodialysis^12,13; however, APD may occur prior to or in the absence of dialysis.³ Other examples of systemic conditions associated with APD include obstructive uropathy, chronic nephritis, anuria, and hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Koebnerization also may trigger lesions to manifest in a linear pattern after localized trauma to the skin.⁷ Acquired perforating dermatosis is associated with other types of trauma, such as healing herpes zoster, or following exposure to drugs, such as tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, bevacizumab, telaprevir, sorafenib, sirolimus, and indinavir.^14-16 Rarely, there have been associations with a history of insect bites, scabies, lymphoma, and hepatobiliary disease.^1-3

Histopathology
Acquired perforating dermatosis is classified as a perforating disease, along with reactive perforating collagenosis, elastosis perforans serpiginosa (EPS), perforating folliculitis, and perforating calcific elastosis. Perforating diseases are histologically characterized by the transepidermal penetration and elimination of altered connective tissue and inflammatory cells.⁵ Each disease differs based on their clinical and histological characteristics.

Histologic sections of APD show a plug of crusting or hyperkeratosis with variable parakeratosis, acanthosis, and occasional dyskeratotic keratinocytes. In the dermis, aggregates of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, or multinucleated giant cells may be found.¹⁷ The histologic findings vary depending on the stage of evolution of the individual lesion. Early lesions show a concave depression with acanthosis, vacuolation of basal keratinocytes, and dermal inflammation.⁴ Additionally, transepidermal channels filled with keratin, pyknotic nuclear debris, inflammatory cells, elastin, or collagen can be noted.³ Over time, the elastic fibers, as detected by the Verhoeff-van Gieson stain, dissipate and the collagen acquires a basophilic staining. Adjacent to the channels, the basement membrane remains intact in early lesions but later shows discontinuities and electron-dense fibrinlike material.³ Occasionally, amorphous degenerated material within the perforations is the major histologic finding.¹¹ Usually, the material cannot be clearly identified as collagen or elastin, but sometimes both are present.

In our case, we identified elastin as the perforating substance, which is less common than collagen, the typical perforating substance in APD. Elastin has occasionally been seen to serve as the only perforating substance from APD lesions among patients. Abe et al¹⁸ reported that the biopsy of a Japanese patient with keratotic follicular papules and serpiginous-arranged papules demonstrated elimination of atypical elastin fibers from the transepidermal channels. This patient was diagnosed with APD as well as EPS and perforating folliculitis based on the clinical presentation.¹⁸ Kim et al¹⁹ studied 30 Korean patients with APD. One had serpiginous hyperkeratotic plaques along the upper extremity and trunk that revealed transepidermal channels containing coarse elastic fibers and basophilic debris; however, due to the serpiginous morphology of lesions, both Abe et al¹⁸ and Kim et al¹⁹ favored a diagnosis of acquired EPS. Saray et al²⁰ conducted a retrospective study of 22 Turkish patients with APD; 1 patient had a painful hyperkeratotic papule on the auricle that on histopathology showed degenerated elastin perforating through the keratotic plug, features similar to our case.

Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnoses include perforating diseases^14,19 as well as other disorders that exhibit the Köbner phenomenon, such as psoriasis, lichen planus, and verruca vulgaris.^21,22 Also, it is not uncommon for patients with APD to have coexisting folliculitis or prurigo nodularis.²²

Treatment
Management is focused on treating the symptoms. For pruritus, sedating antihistamines and other antipruritic agents are efficacious.²³ Topical, intra-lesional, or systemic corticosteroids and topical retinoids have shown variable resolution in APD lesions.²⁴ Some case reports describe topical menthol, salicylic acid, sulfur, benzoyl peroxide, systemic antibiotics (eg, clindamycin, doxycycline), and allopurinol for elevated uric acid levels as effective treatment methods.⁶ Narrowband UVB phototherapy is beneficial for APD and renal disease.^25,26 Renal transplantation has been curative for some patients with APD.²⁷ Given that our patient’s lesions were asymptomatic, no treatment was offered at the time.

Conclusion

Our patient presented with APD localized exclusively to the site of a skin graft, and histologic examination identified elastin as the primary perforating substance. A medical history of DM and chronic kidney disease predisposes patients to APD. This case suggests that skin graft sites may be predisposed to the development of APD.

Case Report

A 57-year-old black woman with a history of dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, diastolic congestive heart failure, and chronic bronchitis was admitted to Howard University Hospital (Washington, DC) for acute chest pain and shortness of breath. During her hospital stay the dermatology team was consulted for evaluation of two 1.6-cm teardrop-shaped, yellow-white-chalky plaques noted in the center of an atrophic, hyperpigmented, shiny, contracted split-thickness skin graft (STSG) on the right posterior forearm (Figure 1). Twenty years prior, the patient received STSGs on the right and left forearm secondary to caustic burns. Two months before the current admission she noticed 2 adjacent teardrop-shaped white plaques within the center of the STSG on the right forearm. At a 3-month follow-up, she had developed more lesions within both graft sites of the bilateral forearm. There was no notable pruritus associated with the lesions.

A 4-mm punch biopsy showed an orthokeratotic plug with basophilic inflammatory debris adjacent to acanthotic epidermis, necrotic basophilic debris at the superficial dermis with epidermal canals extending from the base of the lesion superiorly, and transepidermal elimination of elastic fibers (Figure 2A). A Verhoeff-van Gieson stain revealed the necrotic basophilic debris located in the superficial dermis admixed with a cluster of black wavy elastic fibers establishing the identity of the perforating substance (Figure 2B). Masson trichrome stain revealed loss of collagen structure within the aggregate of elastic fibers adjacent to the epidermis and no collagen within epidermal canals (Figure 2C). These histopathologic findings together with the clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of acquired perforating dermatosis (APD).

Comment

Presentation
Acquired perforating dermatosis is a dermatologic condition characterized by multiple pruritic, dome-shaped papules and plaques with central keratotic plugs giving a craterlike appearance.^1-4 A green-brown or black crust with an erythematous border typically surrounds the primary lesions.⁴ Acquired perforating dermatosis favors a distribution over the trunk, gluteal region, and the extensor surfaces of the upper and lower extremities. Palmoplantar, intertriginous, and mucous membrane regions typically are spared.⁴ Occasionally, APD may present as generalized nodules and papules. Our case consisting of lesions that were localized to STSGs on the forearms supports the typical distribution; however, the presentation of APD occurring within a skin graft is unique.

From an epidemiologic standpoint, APD is more likely to affect men than women (1.5:1 ratio). Additionally, APD’s affected age range is 29 to 96 years (mean, 56.8 years),⁵ which is consistent with our patient’s age. Acquired perforating dermatosis has no racial predilection, though there is a predominance among black patients with concomitant chronic renal failure, as seen in our patient.³

Pathogenesis
The etiology of APD remains unknown.⁶ Some believe that the uremic or calcium deposits on the skin of patients with chronic kidney disease may trigger chronic pruritus, leading to epithelial hyperplasia and the development of perforating lesions.^1,3 A prominent theory in the literature is that superficial trauma, such as scratching, induces necrosis of tissue, facilitating transepidermal elimination of connective tissue components.⁷ The Köbner phenomenon, which can easily be induced by scratching the skin, supports this idea.⁸ Fujimoto et al⁹ suggested that scratching exposes keratinocytes to advanced glycation end product–modified extracellular matrix proteins, particularly types I and III collagen. This exposure leads to the terminal differentiation of keratinocytes with the advanced glycation end receptor (CD36) followed by the upward movement of keratinocytes with glycated collagen. Others postulate fibronectin, involved in epidermal cell signaling, locomotion, and differentiation, is an antigenic trigger because patients with DM and uremia have increased levels of fibronectin in the serum and at sites of perforating skin lesions.¹⁰

Diseases Associated With APD
Acquired perforating dermatosis is an umbrella term for perforating disease found in adults. It is associated with systemic diseases, such as DM and pruritus of renal failure.¹¹ Our patient had both dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease and DM. Acquired perforating dermatosis is observed in 4.5% to 11% of patients on hemodialysis^12,13; however, APD may occur prior to or in the absence of dialysis.³ Other examples of systemic conditions associated with APD include obstructive uropathy, chronic nephritis, anuria, and hypertensive nephrosclerosis. Koebnerization also may trigger lesions to manifest in a linear pattern after localized trauma to the skin.⁷ Acquired perforating dermatosis is associated with other types of trauma, such as healing herpes zoster, or following exposure to drugs, such as tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors, bevacizumab, telaprevir, sorafenib, sirolimus, and indinavir.^14-16 Rarely, there have been associations with a history of insect bites, scabies, lymphoma, and hepatobiliary disease.^1-3

Histopathology
Acquired perforating dermatosis is classified as a perforating disease, along with reactive perforating collagenosis, elastosis perforans serpiginosa (EPS), perforating folliculitis, and perforating calcific elastosis. Perforating diseases are histologically characterized by the transepidermal penetration and elimination of altered connective tissue and inflammatory cells.⁵ Each disease differs based on their clinical and histological characteristics.

Histologic sections of APD show a plug of crusting or hyperkeratosis with variable parakeratosis, acanthosis, and occasional dyskeratotic keratinocytes. In the dermis, aggregates of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, or multinucleated giant cells may be found.¹⁷ The histologic findings vary depending on the stage of evolution of the individual lesion. Early lesions show a concave depression with acanthosis, vacuolation of basal keratinocytes, and dermal inflammation.⁴ Additionally, transepidermal channels filled with keratin, pyknotic nuclear debris, inflammatory cells, elastin, or collagen can be noted.³ Over time, the elastic fibers, as detected by the Verhoeff-van Gieson stain, dissipate and the collagen acquires a basophilic staining. Adjacent to the channels, the basement membrane remains intact in early lesions but later shows discontinuities and electron-dense fibrinlike material.³ Occasionally, amorphous degenerated material within the perforations is the major histologic finding.¹¹ Usually, the material cannot be clearly identified as collagen or elastin, but sometimes both are present.

In our case, we identified elastin as the perforating substance, which is less common than collagen, the typical perforating substance in APD. Elastin has occasionally been seen to serve as the only perforating substance from APD lesions among patients. Abe et al¹⁸ reported that the biopsy of a Japanese patient with keratotic follicular papules and serpiginous-arranged papules demonstrated elimination of atypical elastin fibers from the transepidermal channels. This patient was diagnosed with APD as well as EPS and perforating folliculitis based on the clinical presentation.¹⁸ Kim et al¹⁹ studied 30 Korean patients with APD. One had serpiginous hyperkeratotic plaques along the upper extremity and trunk that revealed transepidermal channels containing coarse elastic fibers and basophilic debris; however, due to the serpiginous morphology of lesions, both Abe et al¹⁸ and Kim et al¹⁹ favored a diagnosis of acquired EPS. Saray et al²⁰ conducted a retrospective study of 22 Turkish patients with APD; 1 patient had a painful hyperkeratotic papule on the auricle that on histopathology showed degenerated elastin perforating through the keratotic plug, features similar to our case.

Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnoses include perforating diseases^14,19 as well as other disorders that exhibit the Köbner phenomenon, such as psoriasis, lichen planus, and verruca vulgaris.^21,22 Also, it is not uncommon for patients with APD to have coexisting folliculitis or prurigo nodularis.²²

Treatment
Management is focused on treating the symptoms. For pruritus, sedating antihistamines and other antipruritic agents are efficacious.²³ Topical, intra-lesional, or systemic corticosteroids and topical retinoids have shown variable resolution in APD lesions.²⁴ Some case reports describe topical menthol, salicylic acid, sulfur, benzoyl peroxide, systemic antibiotics (eg, clindamycin, doxycycline), and allopurinol for elevated uric acid levels as effective treatment methods.⁶ Narrowband UVB phototherapy is beneficial for APD and renal disease.^25,26 Renal transplantation has been curative for some patients with APD.²⁷ Given that our patient’s lesions were asymptomatic, no treatment was offered at the time.

Conclusion

Our patient presented with APD localized exclusively to the site of a skin graft, and histologic examination identified elastin as the primary perforating substance. A medical history of DM and chronic kidney disease predisposes patients to APD. This case suggests that skin graft sites may be predisposed to the development of APD.

In 1964, Sweet¹ described 8 women with acute onset of fever and erythematous plaques associated with a nonspecific infection of the respiratory or gastrointestinal tract. The lesions were histologically characterized by a neutrophilic infiltrate, and the author named the constellation of findings acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis.¹ In 1968, Whittle et al² reported on similar cases and coined the term Sweet syndrome (SS).

Although the etiology and pathogenesis of SS remain unknown, several theories have been proposed. Because SS often is preceded by a respiratory or gastrointestinal tract infection, it has been postulated that it may represent a hypersensitivity reaction or may be related to local or systemic dysregulation of cytokine secretion.^3,4 In addition to respiratory or gastrointestinal tract infections, SS has been reported in association with malignancies, autoimmune diseases, drugs, vaccines, pregnancy, inflammatory bowel disease, and chemotherapy. It also may be idiopathic.⁵

The eruption of SS manifests as erythematous, indurated, and sharply demarcated plaques or nodules that typically favor the head, neck, and arms, with a particularly strong predilection for the dorsal aspects of the hands.⁶ Plaques and nodules are histologically characterized by a diffuse dermal neutrophilic infiltrate, papillary dermal edema, neutrophilic spongiosis, subcorneal pustules, and leukocytoclasia. Vasculitic features are not seen.⁷ The eruption typically resolves spontaneously in 5 to 12 weeks but recurs in approximately 30% of cases.⁸ Relatively common extracutaneous findings include ocular involvement, arthralgia, myalgia, and arthritis.^4,9 Both cutaneous and extracutaneous findings typically are responsive to prednisone at a dosage of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg daily for 4 to 6 weeks. Prolonged low-dose prednisone for 2 to 3 additional months may be necessary to suppress recurrence.⁸ Potassium iodide at 900 mg daily may be used as an alternative regimen.^3,8

Sweet syndrome is divided into 5 subcategories based on the underlying etiology: (1) classic or idiopathic, (2) paraneoplastic, (3) inflammatory and/or autoimmune disease related, (4) pregnancy related, and (5) drug induced.³ Although drug-induced SS comprises the minority of total cases (<5%), its reported incidence has been rising in recent years and has been associated with an escalating number of medications.¹⁰ We report a rare case of SS induced by administration of oral acetaminophen-codeine.

Case Report

A 32-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus underwent postoperative repair of a facial fracture. The patient was administered an oral acetaminophen-codeine suspension for postoperative pain control. One week later, he developed a painful eruption on the forehead and presented to the emergency department. He was prescribed acetaminophen-codeine 300/30-mg tablets every 6 hours in addition to hydrocortisone cream 1% applied every 6 hours. After this reintroduction of oral acetaminophen-codeine, he experienced intermittent fevers and an exacerbation of the initial cutaneous eruption. The patient presented for a second time 2 days after being seen in the emergency department and a dermatology consultation was obtained.

At the time of consultation, the patient was noted to have injected conjunctiva and erythematous, well-demarcated, and indurated plaques on the forehead with associated pain and burning (Figures 1A and 1B). Additional erythematous annular plaques were found on the palms, arms, and right knee. Laboratory workup revealed only mild anemia on complete blood cell count with a white blood cell count of 10.1×10⁹/L (reference range, 4.5–11.0×10⁹/L), hemoglobin of 12.9 g/dL (reference range, 14.0–17.4 g/dL), and hematocrit of 37.3% (reference range, 41%–50%). The platelet count was 284×10³/µL (reference range, 150–350×10³/µL). Basic metabolic panel was notable for an elevated glucose level of 418 mg/dL (reference range, 70–110 mg/dL). The most recent hemoglobin A_1C (several months prior) was notable at 14.7% of total hemoglobin (reference range, 4%–7% of total hemoglobin). A 4-mm punch biopsy of the right side of the forehead demonstrated minimal to mild papillary dermal edema and a diffuse dermal neutrophilic infiltrate spanning the upper, middle, and lower dermis with evidence of mild leukocytoclasia and no evidence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (Figure 2). These histologic features together with the clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of SS.

After an initial dose of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate 125 mg in the emergency department, the patient was admitted for additional intravenous steroid administration in the context of uncontrolled hyperglycemia and history of poor glucose control. Upon admission, acetaminophen-codeine was discontinued and the patient was transitioned to intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate 60 mg every 8 hours. The patient also was given intravenous diphenhydramine 25 mg every 6 hours and desonide ointment 0.05% was applied to facial lesions. The inpatient medication regimen resulted in notable improvement of symptoms within 48 hours. Due to rapid improvement with steroids, no special stains for infectious etiologies were performed. The patient was discharged after 3 days in the hospital with triamcinolone ointment 0.1% to be applied to affected areas twice daily. The patient experienced no recurrence 2 months after treatment (Figure 1C).

Comment

Although SS itself is relatively rare, there has been an increasing incidence of the drug-induced subtype, most often in association with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte monocyte-stimulating factor. There also have been reported associations with a growing number of medications that include antibiotics, antiepileptic drugs, furosemide, hydralazine, and all-trans retinoic acid.^11-19 Moghimi et al¹¹ also reported an association with antivirals, cancer biotherapies, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, psychotropes, azathioprine, oral contraceptives, and propylthiouracil.^10,20-26 Moghimi et al¹¹ further reported an association with several vaccines.

Several therapies for advanced melanoma also have been reviewed in the literature, including ipilimumab and vemurafenib,^27-30 as have several medications for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome including azacitidine.^31,32 A severe episode of drug-induced SS, predominantly on the legs, has been reported in association with lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.³³

Additional medications more recently involved in the pathogenesis of drug-induced SS include the chemotherapeutic agents topetecan, mitoxantrone, gemcitabine, and vorinostat.^34-37 The antimalarial medication chloroquine also has been implicated, as have selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab, IL-2 therapies, aripiprazole, and several other medications.^38-49

Despite drug-induced SS being reported in association with an increasing number of medications, there had been a lack of appropriate diagnostic criteria. To that end, Walker and Cohen⁵⁰ proposed 5 specific diagnostic criteria in 1996, including abrupt onset of painful erythematous plaques or nodules, histopathologic evidence of a dense neutrophilic infiltrate without evidence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pyrexia (temperature >38°C), temporal relationship between drug ingestion and clinical presentation or temporally related recurrence after oral rechallenge, and temporally related resolution of lesions after drug withdrawal or treatment with systemic corticosteroids.^50,51 Our patient met all of these criteria.

Conclusion

The number of cases of drug-induced SS in the literature continues to climb; however, the association with acetaminophen-codeine is unique. The importance of this case lies in educating both physicians and pharmacists alike regarding a newly recognized adverse effect of acetaminophen-codeine. Because acetaminophen-codeine often is used for its analgesic properties, and the predominant symptom of the cutaneous eruption of SS is pain, the therapeutic value of acetaminophen-codeine is substantially diminished in acetaminophen-codeine–induced SS. Accordingly, in these cases, the medication may be discontinued or substituted upon recognition of this adverse reaction to reduce patient morbidity.

In 1964, Sweet¹ described 8 women with acute onset of fever and erythematous plaques associated with a nonspecific infection of the respiratory or gastrointestinal tract. The lesions were histologically characterized by a neutrophilic infiltrate, and the author named the constellation of findings acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis.¹ In 1968, Whittle et al² reported on similar cases and coined the term Sweet syndrome (SS).

Although the etiology and pathogenesis of SS remain unknown, several theories have been proposed. Because SS often is preceded by a respiratory or gastrointestinal tract infection, it has been postulated that it may represent a hypersensitivity reaction or may be related to local or systemic dysregulation of cytokine secretion.^3,4 In addition to respiratory or gastrointestinal tract infections, SS has been reported in association with malignancies, autoimmune diseases, drugs, vaccines, pregnancy, inflammatory bowel disease, and chemotherapy. It also may be idiopathic.⁵

The eruption of SS manifests as erythematous, indurated, and sharply demarcated plaques or nodules that typically favor the head, neck, and arms, with a particularly strong predilection for the dorsal aspects of the hands.⁶ Plaques and nodules are histologically characterized by a diffuse dermal neutrophilic infiltrate, papillary dermal edema, neutrophilic spongiosis, subcorneal pustules, and leukocytoclasia. Vasculitic features are not seen.⁷ The eruption typically resolves spontaneously in 5 to 12 weeks but recurs in approximately 30% of cases.⁸ Relatively common extracutaneous findings include ocular involvement, arthralgia, myalgia, and arthritis.^4,9 Both cutaneous and extracutaneous findings typically are responsive to prednisone at a dosage of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg daily for 4 to 6 weeks. Prolonged low-dose prednisone for 2 to 3 additional months may be necessary to suppress recurrence.⁸ Potassium iodide at 900 mg daily may be used as an alternative regimen.^3,8

Sweet syndrome is divided into 5 subcategories based on the underlying etiology: (1) classic or idiopathic, (2) paraneoplastic, (3) inflammatory and/or autoimmune disease related, (4) pregnancy related, and (5) drug induced.³ Although drug-induced SS comprises the minority of total cases (<5%), its reported incidence has been rising in recent years and has been associated with an escalating number of medications.¹⁰ We report a rare case of SS induced by administration of oral acetaminophen-codeine.

Case Report

A 32-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus underwent postoperative repair of a facial fracture. The patient was administered an oral acetaminophen-codeine suspension for postoperative pain control. One week later, he developed a painful eruption on the forehead and presented to the emergency department. He was prescribed acetaminophen-codeine 300/30-mg tablets every 6 hours in addition to hydrocortisone cream 1% applied every 6 hours. After this reintroduction of oral acetaminophen-codeine, he experienced intermittent fevers and an exacerbation of the initial cutaneous eruption. The patient presented for a second time 2 days after being seen in the emergency department and a dermatology consultation was obtained.

At the time of consultation, the patient was noted to have injected conjunctiva and erythematous, well-demarcated, and indurated plaques on the forehead with associated pain and burning (Figures 1A and 1B). Additional erythematous annular plaques were found on the palms, arms, and right knee. Laboratory workup revealed only mild anemia on complete blood cell count with a white blood cell count of 10.1×10⁹/L (reference range, 4.5–11.0×10⁹/L), hemoglobin of 12.9 g/dL (reference range, 14.0–17.4 g/dL), and hematocrit of 37.3% (reference range, 41%–50%). The platelet count was 284×10³/µL (reference range, 150–350×10³/µL). Basic metabolic panel was notable for an elevated glucose level of 418 mg/dL (reference range, 70–110 mg/dL). The most recent hemoglobin A_1C (several months prior) was notable at 14.7% of total hemoglobin (reference range, 4%–7% of total hemoglobin). A 4-mm punch biopsy of the right side of the forehead demonstrated minimal to mild papillary dermal edema and a diffuse dermal neutrophilic infiltrate spanning the upper, middle, and lower dermis with evidence of mild leukocytoclasia and no evidence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (Figure 2). These histologic features together with the clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of SS.

After an initial dose of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate 125 mg in the emergency department, the patient was admitted for additional intravenous steroid administration in the context of uncontrolled hyperglycemia and history of poor glucose control. Upon admission, acetaminophen-codeine was discontinued and the patient was transitioned to intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate 60 mg every 8 hours. The patient also was given intravenous diphenhydramine 25 mg every 6 hours and desonide ointment 0.05% was applied to facial lesions. The inpatient medication regimen resulted in notable improvement of symptoms within 48 hours. Due to rapid improvement with steroids, no special stains for infectious etiologies were performed. The patient was discharged after 3 days in the hospital with triamcinolone ointment 0.1% to be applied to affected areas twice daily. The patient experienced no recurrence 2 months after treatment (Figure 1C).

Comment

Although SS itself is relatively rare, there has been an increasing incidence of the drug-induced subtype, most often in association with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte monocyte-stimulating factor. There also have been reported associations with a growing number of medications that include antibiotics, antiepileptic drugs, furosemide, hydralazine, and all-trans retinoic acid.^11-19 Moghimi et al¹¹ also reported an association with antivirals, cancer biotherapies, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, psychotropes, azathioprine, oral contraceptives, and propylthiouracil.^10,20-26 Moghimi et al¹¹ further reported an association with several vaccines.

Several therapies for advanced melanoma also have been reviewed in the literature, including ipilimumab and vemurafenib,^27-30 as have several medications for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome including azacitidine.^31,32 A severe episode of drug-induced SS, predominantly on the legs, has been reported in association with lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.³³

Additional medications more recently involved in the pathogenesis of drug-induced SS include the chemotherapeutic agents topetecan, mitoxantrone, gemcitabine, and vorinostat.^34-37 The antimalarial medication chloroquine also has been implicated, as have selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab, IL-2 therapies, aripiprazole, and several other medications.^38-49

Despite drug-induced SS being reported in association with an increasing number of medications, there had been a lack of appropriate diagnostic criteria. To that end, Walker and Cohen⁵⁰ proposed 5 specific diagnostic criteria in 1996, including abrupt onset of painful erythematous plaques or nodules, histopathologic evidence of a dense neutrophilic infiltrate without evidence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pyrexia (temperature >38°C), temporal relationship between drug ingestion and clinical presentation or temporally related recurrence after oral rechallenge, and temporally related resolution of lesions after drug withdrawal or treatment with systemic corticosteroids.^50,51 Our patient met all of these criteria.

Conclusion

The number of cases of drug-induced SS in the literature continues to climb; however, the association with acetaminophen-codeine is unique. The importance of this case lies in educating both physicians and pharmacists alike regarding a newly recognized adverse effect of acetaminophen-codeine. Because acetaminophen-codeine often is used for its analgesic properties, and the predominant symptom of the cutaneous eruption of SS is pain, the therapeutic value of acetaminophen-codeine is substantially diminished in acetaminophen-codeine–induced SS. Accordingly, in these cases, the medication may be discontinued or substituted upon recognition of this adverse reaction to reduce patient morbidity.

In 1964, Sweet¹ described 8 women with acute onset of fever and erythematous plaques associated with a nonspecific infection of the respiratory or gastrointestinal tract. The lesions were histologically characterized by a neutrophilic infiltrate, and the author named the constellation of findings acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis.¹ In 1968, Whittle et al² reported on similar cases and coined the term Sweet syndrome (SS).

Although the etiology and pathogenesis of SS remain unknown, several theories have been proposed. Because SS often is preceded by a respiratory or gastrointestinal tract infection, it has been postulated that it may represent a hypersensitivity reaction or may be related to local or systemic dysregulation of cytokine secretion.^3,4 In addition to respiratory or gastrointestinal tract infections, SS has been reported in association with malignancies, autoimmune diseases, drugs, vaccines, pregnancy, inflammatory bowel disease, and chemotherapy. It also may be idiopathic.⁵

The eruption of SS manifests as erythematous, indurated, and sharply demarcated plaques or nodules that typically favor the head, neck, and arms, with a particularly strong predilection for the dorsal aspects of the hands.⁶ Plaques and nodules are histologically characterized by a diffuse dermal neutrophilic infiltrate, papillary dermal edema, neutrophilic spongiosis, subcorneal pustules, and leukocytoclasia. Vasculitic features are not seen.⁷ The eruption typically resolves spontaneously in 5 to 12 weeks but recurs in approximately 30% of cases.⁸ Relatively common extracutaneous findings include ocular involvement, arthralgia, myalgia, and arthritis.^4,9 Both cutaneous and extracutaneous findings typically are responsive to prednisone at a dosage of 0.5 to 1 mg/kg daily for 4 to 6 weeks. Prolonged low-dose prednisone for 2 to 3 additional months may be necessary to suppress recurrence.⁸ Potassium iodide at 900 mg daily may be used as an alternative regimen.^3,8

Sweet syndrome is divided into 5 subcategories based on the underlying etiology: (1) classic or idiopathic, (2) paraneoplastic, (3) inflammatory and/or autoimmune disease related, (4) pregnancy related, and (5) drug induced.³ Although drug-induced SS comprises the minority of total cases (<5%), its reported incidence has been rising in recent years and has been associated with an escalating number of medications.¹⁰ We report a rare case of SS induced by administration of oral acetaminophen-codeine.

Case Report

A 32-year-old man with a history of diabetes mellitus underwent postoperative repair of a facial fracture. The patient was administered an oral acetaminophen-codeine suspension for postoperative pain control. One week later, he developed a painful eruption on the forehead and presented to the emergency department. He was prescribed acetaminophen-codeine 300/30-mg tablets every 6 hours in addition to hydrocortisone cream 1% applied every 6 hours. After this reintroduction of oral acetaminophen-codeine, he experienced intermittent fevers and an exacerbation of the initial cutaneous eruption. The patient presented for a second time 2 days after being seen in the emergency department and a dermatology consultation was obtained.

At the time of consultation, the patient was noted to have injected conjunctiva and erythematous, well-demarcated, and indurated plaques on the forehead with associated pain and burning (Figures 1A and 1B). Additional erythematous annular plaques were found on the palms, arms, and right knee. Laboratory workup revealed only mild anemia on complete blood cell count with a white blood cell count of 10.1×10⁹/L (reference range, 4.5–11.0×10⁹/L), hemoglobin of 12.9 g/dL (reference range, 14.0–17.4 g/dL), and hematocrit of 37.3% (reference range, 41%–50%). The platelet count was 284×10³/µL (reference range, 150–350×10³/µL). Basic metabolic panel was notable for an elevated glucose level of 418 mg/dL (reference range, 70–110 mg/dL). The most recent hemoglobin A_1C (several months prior) was notable at 14.7% of total hemoglobin (reference range, 4%–7% of total hemoglobin). A 4-mm punch biopsy of the right side of the forehead demonstrated minimal to mild papillary dermal edema and a diffuse dermal neutrophilic infiltrate spanning the upper, middle, and lower dermis with evidence of mild leukocytoclasia and no evidence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis (Figure 2). These histologic features together with the clinical presentation were consistent with a diagnosis of SS.

After an initial dose of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate 125 mg in the emergency department, the patient was admitted for additional intravenous steroid administration in the context of uncontrolled hyperglycemia and history of poor glucose control. Upon admission, acetaminophen-codeine was discontinued and the patient was transitioned to intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate 60 mg every 8 hours. The patient also was given intravenous diphenhydramine 25 mg every 6 hours and desonide ointment 0.05% was applied to facial lesions. The inpatient medication regimen resulted in notable improvement of symptoms within 48 hours. Due to rapid improvement with steroids, no special stains for infectious etiologies were performed. The patient was discharged after 3 days in the hospital with triamcinolone ointment 0.1% to be applied to affected areas twice daily. The patient experienced no recurrence 2 months after treatment (Figure 1C).

Comment

Although SS itself is relatively rare, there has been an increasing incidence of the drug-induced subtype, most often in association with use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte monocyte-stimulating factor. There also have been reported associations with a growing number of medications that include antibiotics, antiepileptic drugs, furosemide, hydralazine, and all-trans retinoic acid.^11-19 Moghimi et al¹¹ also reported an association with antivirals, cancer biotherapies, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, psychotropes, azathioprine, oral contraceptives, and propylthiouracil.^10,20-26 Moghimi et al¹¹ further reported an association with several vaccines.

Several therapies for advanced melanoma also have been reviewed in the literature, including ipilimumab and vemurafenib,^27-30 as have several medications for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome including azacitidine.^31,32 A severe episode of drug-induced SS, predominantly on the legs, has been reported in association with lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.³³

Additional medications more recently involved in the pathogenesis of drug-induced SS include the chemotherapeutic agents topetecan, mitoxantrone, gemcitabine, and vorinostat.^34-37 The antimalarial medication chloroquine also has been implicated, as have selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, hypomethylating agents, the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab, IL-2 therapies, aripiprazole, and several other medications.^38-49

Despite drug-induced SS being reported in association with an increasing number of medications, there had been a lack of appropriate diagnostic criteria. To that end, Walker and Cohen⁵⁰ proposed 5 specific diagnostic criteria in 1996, including abrupt onset of painful erythematous plaques or nodules, histopathologic evidence of a dense neutrophilic infiltrate without evidence of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pyrexia (temperature >38°C), temporal relationship between drug ingestion and clinical presentation or temporally related recurrence after oral rechallenge, and temporally related resolution of lesions after drug withdrawal or treatment with systemic corticosteroids.^50,51 Our patient met all of these criteria.

Conclusion

The number of cases of drug-induced SS in the literature continues to climb; however, the association with acetaminophen-codeine is unique. The importance of this case lies in educating both physicians and pharmacists alike regarding a newly recognized adverse effect of acetaminophen-codeine. Because acetaminophen-codeine often is used for its analgesic properties, and the predominant symptom of the cutaneous eruption of SS is pain, the therapeutic value of acetaminophen-codeine is substantially diminished in acetaminophen-codeine–induced SS. Accordingly, in these cases, the medication may be discontinued or substituted upon recognition of this adverse reaction to reduce patient morbidity.