User login
Doug Brunk is a San Diego-based award-winning reporter who began covering health care in 1991. Before joining the company, he wrote for the health sciences division of Columbia University and was an associate editor at Contemporary Long Term Care magazine when it won a Jesse H. Neal Award. His work has been syndicated by the Los Angeles Times and he is the author of two books related to the University of Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball program. Doug has a master’s degree in magazine journalism from the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Follow him on Twitter @dougbrunk.
SEER data show that pancreatic cancer mortality rates differ by ethnicity
SAN DIEGO – .
However, between 2013 and 2015, mortality rates began to fall among all ethnicities, for reasons that remain unclear. “There is still a significant disparity between the [white] and African American populations,” lead study author Mohamed M. Gad, MD, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week. “Trends for the Asian/American Indian populations were similar to that of the [white] population.”
While most patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are white men, the disparities among racial and ethnic groups have not been addressed on a large scale, said Dr. Gad, an internal medicine resident at the Cleveland Clinic. In an effort to investigate the racial disparities in mortality rates in patients with pancreatic cancer, he and colleagues collected data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Program (SEER) 9 database during 1973 to 2015. The researchers calculated mortality rates for all pancreatic cancer cases by race. Next, they calculated the Observed/Expected (O/E) ratio and the excess risk per 10,000 person-years to estimate the change of risk following the diagnosis in different ethnicities, when compared to the general population, using Joinpoint Regression software.
Dr. Gad reported results from 65,985 patients who died from pancreatic cancer between 1973 and 2015. The overall mortality rate was highest for African Americans (9.4%), followed by whites (6.4%), and Asians/American Indians (5.4%). The researchers observed that mortality rates of all racial groups continued to increase from 1973 until 2013. However, between 2013 and 2015, the mortality rates decreased by 20.5% for African Americans, by 27.1% for whites, and by 25.1% for Asians/American Indians (P less than .001 for all decreases). Socioeconomic status and access to health care have been hypothesized to play a role in these observed outcomes, Dr. Gad said, but more research is needed to understand the observed disparities and assess the need for intervention. For example, he said, one line of research would be to evaluate the difference between access to health care and the quality of health care delivery for African American patients compared with their white counterparts. “Once we identify that, how can we improve outcomes for the African American population?” Dr. Gad asked.
He reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – .
However, between 2013 and 2015, mortality rates began to fall among all ethnicities, for reasons that remain unclear. “There is still a significant disparity between the [white] and African American populations,” lead study author Mohamed M. Gad, MD, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week. “Trends for the Asian/American Indian populations were similar to that of the [white] population.”
While most patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are white men, the disparities among racial and ethnic groups have not been addressed on a large scale, said Dr. Gad, an internal medicine resident at the Cleveland Clinic. In an effort to investigate the racial disparities in mortality rates in patients with pancreatic cancer, he and colleagues collected data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Program (SEER) 9 database during 1973 to 2015. The researchers calculated mortality rates for all pancreatic cancer cases by race. Next, they calculated the Observed/Expected (O/E) ratio and the excess risk per 10,000 person-years to estimate the change of risk following the diagnosis in different ethnicities, when compared to the general population, using Joinpoint Regression software.
Dr. Gad reported results from 65,985 patients who died from pancreatic cancer between 1973 and 2015. The overall mortality rate was highest for African Americans (9.4%), followed by whites (6.4%), and Asians/American Indians (5.4%). The researchers observed that mortality rates of all racial groups continued to increase from 1973 until 2013. However, between 2013 and 2015, the mortality rates decreased by 20.5% for African Americans, by 27.1% for whites, and by 25.1% for Asians/American Indians (P less than .001 for all decreases). Socioeconomic status and access to health care have been hypothesized to play a role in these observed outcomes, Dr. Gad said, but more research is needed to understand the observed disparities and assess the need for intervention. For example, he said, one line of research would be to evaluate the difference between access to health care and the quality of health care delivery for African American patients compared with their white counterparts. “Once we identify that, how can we improve outcomes for the African American population?” Dr. Gad asked.
He reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – .
However, between 2013 and 2015, mortality rates began to fall among all ethnicities, for reasons that remain unclear. “There is still a significant disparity between the [white] and African American populations,” lead study author Mohamed M. Gad, MD, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week. “Trends for the Asian/American Indian populations were similar to that of the [white] population.”
While most patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer are white men, the disparities among racial and ethnic groups have not been addressed on a large scale, said Dr. Gad, an internal medicine resident at the Cleveland Clinic. In an effort to investigate the racial disparities in mortality rates in patients with pancreatic cancer, he and colleagues collected data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Program (SEER) 9 database during 1973 to 2015. The researchers calculated mortality rates for all pancreatic cancer cases by race. Next, they calculated the Observed/Expected (O/E) ratio and the excess risk per 10,000 person-years to estimate the change of risk following the diagnosis in different ethnicities, when compared to the general population, using Joinpoint Regression software.
Dr. Gad reported results from 65,985 patients who died from pancreatic cancer between 1973 and 2015. The overall mortality rate was highest for African Americans (9.4%), followed by whites (6.4%), and Asians/American Indians (5.4%). The researchers observed that mortality rates of all racial groups continued to increase from 1973 until 2013. However, between 2013 and 2015, the mortality rates decreased by 20.5% for African Americans, by 27.1% for whites, and by 25.1% for Asians/American Indians (P less than .001 for all decreases). Socioeconomic status and access to health care have been hypothesized to play a role in these observed outcomes, Dr. Gad said, but more research is needed to understand the observed disparities and assess the need for intervention. For example, he said, one line of research would be to evaluate the difference between access to health care and the quality of health care delivery for African American patients compared with their white counterparts. “Once we identify that, how can we improve outcomes for the African American population?” Dr. Gad asked.
He reported having no financial disclosures.
REPORTING FROM DDW 2019
Ethnicity seems to affect predisposition to components of metabolic syndrome
SAN DIEGO – .
“It appears that not all components of metabolic syndrome directly correlate with visceral fat,” lead study author Patrick Chen, DO, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
According to Dr. Chen, a gastroenterology fellow at Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, the prevalence of obesity in the United States increased from 30.5% in 2000 to 39.6% in 2015, a condition that costs the U.S. medical system $150 billion each year and is associated with 19% of all deaths. “We also know that abdominal visceral fat is more associated with mortality and cardiac events than overall adiposity, while visceral fat contributes to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome,” he said.
For Asian populations, the World Health Organization has set body mass indexes of 23 kg/m2 for overweight and 27.5 kg/m2 for obesity. “This has led to an ongoing debate as to whether we should be adopting regional anthropometric criteria based on race-unique risk factors,” Dr. Chen said. “Despite all of these association studies, the mechanisms are still undergoing research and still unknown to this day.”
For the current analysis, he and his colleagues assessed the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and the impact of increasing BMI among racial groups in the United States. They drew from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2011 to 2015 to collect and compare data on patient race, BMI, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, and used SPSS software for chi-square analysis. They excluded patients under the age of 18, those with type 1 diabetes, those with no listed race, and Native American populations, “since there were too few patients for meaningful analysis,” he said.
The 69,949 patients in the analysis included 57,448 whites, 9,281 African Americans, and 2,142 Asians. The majority (64,091) were listed as non-Hispanic, while 5,858 were listed as Hispanic. The mean age of the study population ranged from 49 to 55 years. African Americans had the highest mean BMI (31 kg/m2), followed by whites (29 kg/m2) and Asians (25 kg/m2). Meanwhile, both Hispanics and non-Hispanics had a mean BMI of 29 kg/m2.
Dr. Chen reported that African Americans (19.3%) and Asians (18.5%) had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with whites (13.4%; P less than .001), while Hispanics had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with non-Hispanics (18.9% vs. 13.9%; P less than .001). At the same time, African Americans had a higher prevalence of hypertension (49.6%) compared with whites (38.2%) and Asians (37.9%; P less than .001 for both associations), while non-Hispanics had a higher prevalence of hypertension compared with Hispanics (40.4% vs. 33.1%; P less than .001). Asians had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (28.4%) compared with whites (25.6%; P = .004); both groups had a higher prevalence compared with African Americans (21.9%, P less than .001). Hispanics had a lower prevalence of hyperlipidemia compared with non-Hispanics (23.6% vs. 25.1%; P = .005).
“Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia likely have different mechanisms that lead to different race’s predisposition to these diseases,” Dr. Chen concluded. “This study supports that regional anthropometric criteria should be done based on ethnicity-specific risk factors. Some food for thought is whether we need to change our screening guidelines for conditions like diabetes for Asian patients and hypertension in African American patients. We should also consider ethnicity when we look for NAFLD. Overall, continued research is needed to explain these correlations.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Chen P et al. DDW 2019, Abstract 447.
SAN DIEGO – .
“It appears that not all components of metabolic syndrome directly correlate with visceral fat,” lead study author Patrick Chen, DO, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
According to Dr. Chen, a gastroenterology fellow at Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, the prevalence of obesity in the United States increased from 30.5% in 2000 to 39.6% in 2015, a condition that costs the U.S. medical system $150 billion each year and is associated with 19% of all deaths. “We also know that abdominal visceral fat is more associated with mortality and cardiac events than overall adiposity, while visceral fat contributes to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome,” he said.
For Asian populations, the World Health Organization has set body mass indexes of 23 kg/m2 for overweight and 27.5 kg/m2 for obesity. “This has led to an ongoing debate as to whether we should be adopting regional anthropometric criteria based on race-unique risk factors,” Dr. Chen said. “Despite all of these association studies, the mechanisms are still undergoing research and still unknown to this day.”
For the current analysis, he and his colleagues assessed the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and the impact of increasing BMI among racial groups in the United States. They drew from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2011 to 2015 to collect and compare data on patient race, BMI, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, and used SPSS software for chi-square analysis. They excluded patients under the age of 18, those with type 1 diabetes, those with no listed race, and Native American populations, “since there were too few patients for meaningful analysis,” he said.
The 69,949 patients in the analysis included 57,448 whites, 9,281 African Americans, and 2,142 Asians. The majority (64,091) were listed as non-Hispanic, while 5,858 were listed as Hispanic. The mean age of the study population ranged from 49 to 55 years. African Americans had the highest mean BMI (31 kg/m2), followed by whites (29 kg/m2) and Asians (25 kg/m2). Meanwhile, both Hispanics and non-Hispanics had a mean BMI of 29 kg/m2.
Dr. Chen reported that African Americans (19.3%) and Asians (18.5%) had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with whites (13.4%; P less than .001), while Hispanics had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with non-Hispanics (18.9% vs. 13.9%; P less than .001). At the same time, African Americans had a higher prevalence of hypertension (49.6%) compared with whites (38.2%) and Asians (37.9%; P less than .001 for both associations), while non-Hispanics had a higher prevalence of hypertension compared with Hispanics (40.4% vs. 33.1%; P less than .001). Asians had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (28.4%) compared with whites (25.6%; P = .004); both groups had a higher prevalence compared with African Americans (21.9%, P less than .001). Hispanics had a lower prevalence of hyperlipidemia compared with non-Hispanics (23.6% vs. 25.1%; P = .005).
“Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia likely have different mechanisms that lead to different race’s predisposition to these diseases,” Dr. Chen concluded. “This study supports that regional anthropometric criteria should be done based on ethnicity-specific risk factors. Some food for thought is whether we need to change our screening guidelines for conditions like diabetes for Asian patients and hypertension in African American patients. We should also consider ethnicity when we look for NAFLD. Overall, continued research is needed to explain these correlations.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Chen P et al. DDW 2019, Abstract 447.
SAN DIEGO – .
“It appears that not all components of metabolic syndrome directly correlate with visceral fat,” lead study author Patrick Chen, DO, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week.
According to Dr. Chen, a gastroenterology fellow at Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, the prevalence of obesity in the United States increased from 30.5% in 2000 to 39.6% in 2015, a condition that costs the U.S. medical system $150 billion each year and is associated with 19% of all deaths. “We also know that abdominal visceral fat is more associated with mortality and cardiac events than overall adiposity, while visceral fat contributes to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome,” he said.
For Asian populations, the World Health Organization has set body mass indexes of 23 kg/m2 for overweight and 27.5 kg/m2 for obesity. “This has led to an ongoing debate as to whether we should be adopting regional anthropometric criteria based on race-unique risk factors,” Dr. Chen said. “Despite all of these association studies, the mechanisms are still undergoing research and still unknown to this day.”
For the current analysis, he and his colleagues assessed the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia and the impact of increasing BMI among racial groups in the United States. They drew from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2011 to 2015 to collect and compare data on patient race, BMI, and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, and used SPSS software for chi-square analysis. They excluded patients under the age of 18, those with type 1 diabetes, those with no listed race, and Native American populations, “since there were too few patients for meaningful analysis,” he said.
The 69,949 patients in the analysis included 57,448 whites, 9,281 African Americans, and 2,142 Asians. The majority (64,091) were listed as non-Hispanic, while 5,858 were listed as Hispanic. The mean age of the study population ranged from 49 to 55 years. African Americans had the highest mean BMI (31 kg/m2), followed by whites (29 kg/m2) and Asians (25 kg/m2). Meanwhile, both Hispanics and non-Hispanics had a mean BMI of 29 kg/m2.
Dr. Chen reported that African Americans (19.3%) and Asians (18.5%) had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with whites (13.4%; P less than .001), while Hispanics had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with non-Hispanics (18.9% vs. 13.9%; P less than .001). At the same time, African Americans had a higher prevalence of hypertension (49.6%) compared with whites (38.2%) and Asians (37.9%; P less than .001 for both associations), while non-Hispanics had a higher prevalence of hypertension compared with Hispanics (40.4% vs. 33.1%; P less than .001). Asians had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (28.4%) compared with whites (25.6%; P = .004); both groups had a higher prevalence compared with African Americans (21.9%, P less than .001). Hispanics had a lower prevalence of hyperlipidemia compared with non-Hispanics (23.6% vs. 25.1%; P = .005).
“Diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia likely have different mechanisms that lead to different race’s predisposition to these diseases,” Dr. Chen concluded. “This study supports that regional anthropometric criteria should be done based on ethnicity-specific risk factors. Some food for thought is whether we need to change our screening guidelines for conditions like diabetes for Asian patients and hypertension in African American patients. We should also consider ethnicity when we look for NAFLD. Overall, continued research is needed to explain these correlations.”
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Chen P et al. DDW 2019, Abstract 447.
REPORTING FROM DDW 2019
Bariatric surgery found to be effective in IBD patients
SAN DIEGO – In carefully selected patients with well-controlled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), bariatric surgery results in sustained weight loss over a 2-year period, results from a retrospective study suggest.
“Obesity is increasing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease at a rate similar to that seen in the general population,” the study’s primary author, Nicholas P. McKenna, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “While bariatric surgery is a well-accepted therapy for obesity in patients without IBD, its use in patients with IBD is less well studied.”
For the current study, Dr. McKenna, a resident in the department of surgery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and colleagues collected data on 33 patients who underwent bariatric surgery with a pre- or postoperative diagnosis of IBD across three academic centers between August 2006 and December 2017. They evaluated IBD characteristics and medications; postoperative complications; the need for future IBD-related surgery; and weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months.
The patients underwent 34 bariatric operations. Their median age was 51 years and their median duration of IBD was 13 years. Of the 33 patients, 16 underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure: 9 who had ulcerative colitis, 6 who had Crohn’s disease, and 1 who had indeterminate colitis. A total of 14 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy: 7 who had ulcerative colitis and 7 who had Crohn’s disease. Four patients underwent a gastric band procedure, all of whom had ulcerative colitis. The mean body mass index of patients prior to their bariatric procedures was 42.7 kg/m2. A total of 31 patients had an existing diagnosis of IBD, and 2 were diagnosed with Crohn’s disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In addition, 9 patients were on preoperative immunosuppression for IBD, and 11 had undergone prior intestinal resection for IBD.
Dr. McKenna reported that the average hospitalization for all patients was 3.6 days and that only four 30-day infectious complications occurred: two superficial surgical site infections, one infected intra-abdominal hematoma, and one hepatic abscess. In the long term, seven patients required reoperation: three for failed gastric band, two for reduction of internal hernia, and two for cholelithiasis. The researchers found that the mean percentage of overall excess weight loss was 57.5% at 6 months, 63.3% at 12 months, and 58.6% at 24 months. During a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, no IBD flares requiring surgery were observed.
“Our hypothesis based on the existing literature was that bariatric surgery would be safe in carefully selected patients with IBD and result in sustained weight loss, so we were not surprised with these results,” Dr. McKenna said. “We were not sure if medication requirements would change after surgery as the literature is conflicted on this. We observed that most patients continued to require no immunosuppression for control of their IBD after surgery. Further, we did not observe that any patients required future surgery at the time of last follow-up for an IBD flare.”
He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design. “Additionally, though it is a relatively large sample, compared to the existing literature on bariatric surgery in IBD, it is still only 33 patients. This limits the comparisons that can be performed between patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and between the operation choices.”
The study’s secondary author, Alaa Sada, MD, a surgery resident at Mayo, presented the findings at the meeting. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – In carefully selected patients with well-controlled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), bariatric surgery results in sustained weight loss over a 2-year period, results from a retrospective study suggest.
“Obesity is increasing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease at a rate similar to that seen in the general population,” the study’s primary author, Nicholas P. McKenna, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “While bariatric surgery is a well-accepted therapy for obesity in patients without IBD, its use in patients with IBD is less well studied.”
For the current study, Dr. McKenna, a resident in the department of surgery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and colleagues collected data on 33 patients who underwent bariatric surgery with a pre- or postoperative diagnosis of IBD across three academic centers between August 2006 and December 2017. They evaluated IBD characteristics and medications; postoperative complications; the need for future IBD-related surgery; and weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months.
The patients underwent 34 bariatric operations. Their median age was 51 years and their median duration of IBD was 13 years. Of the 33 patients, 16 underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure: 9 who had ulcerative colitis, 6 who had Crohn’s disease, and 1 who had indeterminate colitis. A total of 14 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy: 7 who had ulcerative colitis and 7 who had Crohn’s disease. Four patients underwent a gastric band procedure, all of whom had ulcerative colitis. The mean body mass index of patients prior to their bariatric procedures was 42.7 kg/m2. A total of 31 patients had an existing diagnosis of IBD, and 2 were diagnosed with Crohn’s disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In addition, 9 patients were on preoperative immunosuppression for IBD, and 11 had undergone prior intestinal resection for IBD.
Dr. McKenna reported that the average hospitalization for all patients was 3.6 days and that only four 30-day infectious complications occurred: two superficial surgical site infections, one infected intra-abdominal hematoma, and one hepatic abscess. In the long term, seven patients required reoperation: three for failed gastric band, two for reduction of internal hernia, and two for cholelithiasis. The researchers found that the mean percentage of overall excess weight loss was 57.5% at 6 months, 63.3% at 12 months, and 58.6% at 24 months. During a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, no IBD flares requiring surgery were observed.
“Our hypothesis based on the existing literature was that bariatric surgery would be safe in carefully selected patients with IBD and result in sustained weight loss, so we were not surprised with these results,” Dr. McKenna said. “We were not sure if medication requirements would change after surgery as the literature is conflicted on this. We observed that most patients continued to require no immunosuppression for control of their IBD after surgery. Further, we did not observe that any patients required future surgery at the time of last follow-up for an IBD flare.”
He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design. “Additionally, though it is a relatively large sample, compared to the existing literature on bariatric surgery in IBD, it is still only 33 patients. This limits the comparisons that can be performed between patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and between the operation choices.”
The study’s secondary author, Alaa Sada, MD, a surgery resident at Mayo, presented the findings at the meeting. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – In carefully selected patients with well-controlled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), bariatric surgery results in sustained weight loss over a 2-year period, results from a retrospective study suggest.
“Obesity is increasing in patients with inflammatory bowel disease at a rate similar to that seen in the general population,” the study’s primary author, Nicholas P. McKenna, MD, said in an interview in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “While bariatric surgery is a well-accepted therapy for obesity in patients without IBD, its use in patients with IBD is less well studied.”
For the current study, Dr. McKenna, a resident in the department of surgery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and colleagues collected data on 33 patients who underwent bariatric surgery with a pre- or postoperative diagnosis of IBD across three academic centers between August 2006 and December 2017. They evaluated IBD characteristics and medications; postoperative complications; the need for future IBD-related surgery; and weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months.
The patients underwent 34 bariatric operations. Their median age was 51 years and their median duration of IBD was 13 years. Of the 33 patients, 16 underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure: 9 who had ulcerative colitis, 6 who had Crohn’s disease, and 1 who had indeterminate colitis. A total of 14 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy: 7 who had ulcerative colitis and 7 who had Crohn’s disease. Four patients underwent a gastric band procedure, all of whom had ulcerative colitis. The mean body mass index of patients prior to their bariatric procedures was 42.7 kg/m2. A total of 31 patients had an existing diagnosis of IBD, and 2 were diagnosed with Crohn’s disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. In addition, 9 patients were on preoperative immunosuppression for IBD, and 11 had undergone prior intestinal resection for IBD.
Dr. McKenna reported that the average hospitalization for all patients was 3.6 days and that only four 30-day infectious complications occurred: two superficial surgical site infections, one infected intra-abdominal hematoma, and one hepatic abscess. In the long term, seven patients required reoperation: three for failed gastric band, two for reduction of internal hernia, and two for cholelithiasis. The researchers found that the mean percentage of overall excess weight loss was 57.5% at 6 months, 63.3% at 12 months, and 58.6% at 24 months. During a mean follow-up of 3.4 years, no IBD flares requiring surgery were observed.
“Our hypothesis based on the existing literature was that bariatric surgery would be safe in carefully selected patients with IBD and result in sustained weight loss, so we were not surprised with these results,” Dr. McKenna said. “We were not sure if medication requirements would change after surgery as the literature is conflicted on this. We observed that most patients continued to require no immunosuppression for control of their IBD after surgery. Further, we did not observe that any patients required future surgery at the time of last follow-up for an IBD flare.”
He acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its retrospective design. “Additionally, though it is a relatively large sample, compared to the existing literature on bariatric surgery in IBD, it is still only 33 patients. This limits the comparisons that can be performed between patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and between the operation choices.”
The study’s secondary author, Alaa Sada, MD, a surgery resident at Mayo, presented the findings at the meeting. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
REPORTING FROM DDW 2019
Rifaximin effective for uncomplicated diverticulitis in real-life study
SAN DIEGO – Rifaximin relieves symptoms and reduces the risk of disease-related complications in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) of the colon, results from a retrospective study showed.
“The majority of studies published on this topic are not exactly the picture of real life, because they’re conducted on a selected sample of patients queued into the hospital,” lead study author Francesco Di Mario, MD, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week. Dr. Di Mario sought long-term data “from general practitioners – data from real life.”
For an 8-year follow-up study, Dr. Di Mario, professor of gastroenterology at the University of Parma (Italy), and colleagues at several general physician practices in Italy enrolled two groups of patients. The study group (group A) consisted of 346 SUDD patients who were treated with rifaximin 800 mg/day for 7 days every month. Their median age was 64 years, and 63% were female. The control group (group B) included 470 SUDD patients who were taking spasmolithics or any other treatment on demand. Their median age was 65 years, and 61% were female.
The researchers administered a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) to assess left lower abdominal pain and bloating, with a score of 10 representing the most severe symptoms. Daily bowel movements were also reported.
The median baseline VAS score for pain was 6 in groups A and B. After 8 years of follow-up, the VAS scores for the two groups were 3 and 6, respectively (P less than .0001), and both bloating and daily bowel movements were significantly reduced in group A (P less than .0001).
As for the impact of rifaximin on other outcomes, acute diverticulitis occurred in 9 patients in group A (2.6%) and in 21 patients in group B (4.5%), a difference that reached statistical significance (P = .155). In addition, four patients (1.2%) in group A and nine patients (1.9%) in group B had surgery (P = .432). No disease-related deaths occurred in group A, but two patients in group B died (0.4%; P = .239). No side effects were recorded during the entire study period.
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Rifaximin relieves symptoms and reduces the risk of disease-related complications in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) of the colon, results from a retrospective study showed.
“The majority of studies published on this topic are not exactly the picture of real life, because they’re conducted on a selected sample of patients queued into the hospital,” lead study author Francesco Di Mario, MD, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week. Dr. Di Mario sought long-term data “from general practitioners – data from real life.”
For an 8-year follow-up study, Dr. Di Mario, professor of gastroenterology at the University of Parma (Italy), and colleagues at several general physician practices in Italy enrolled two groups of patients. The study group (group A) consisted of 346 SUDD patients who were treated with rifaximin 800 mg/day for 7 days every month. Their median age was 64 years, and 63% were female. The control group (group B) included 470 SUDD patients who were taking spasmolithics or any other treatment on demand. Their median age was 65 years, and 61% were female.
The researchers administered a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) to assess left lower abdominal pain and bloating, with a score of 10 representing the most severe symptoms. Daily bowel movements were also reported.
The median baseline VAS score for pain was 6 in groups A and B. After 8 years of follow-up, the VAS scores for the two groups were 3 and 6, respectively (P less than .0001), and both bloating and daily bowel movements were significantly reduced in group A (P less than .0001).
As for the impact of rifaximin on other outcomes, acute diverticulitis occurred in 9 patients in group A (2.6%) and in 21 patients in group B (4.5%), a difference that reached statistical significance (P = .155). In addition, four patients (1.2%) in group A and nine patients (1.9%) in group B had surgery (P = .432). No disease-related deaths occurred in group A, but two patients in group B died (0.4%; P = .239). No side effects were recorded during the entire study period.
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Rifaximin relieves symptoms and reduces the risk of disease-related complications in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) of the colon, results from a retrospective study showed.
“The majority of studies published on this topic are not exactly the picture of real life, because they’re conducted on a selected sample of patients queued into the hospital,” lead study author Francesco Di Mario, MD, said at the annual Digestive Disease Week. Dr. Di Mario sought long-term data “from general practitioners – data from real life.”
For an 8-year follow-up study, Dr. Di Mario, professor of gastroenterology at the University of Parma (Italy), and colleagues at several general physician practices in Italy enrolled two groups of patients. The study group (group A) consisted of 346 SUDD patients who were treated with rifaximin 800 mg/day for 7 days every month. Their median age was 64 years, and 63% were female. The control group (group B) included 470 SUDD patients who were taking spasmolithics or any other treatment on demand. Their median age was 65 years, and 61% were female.
The researchers administered a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) to assess left lower abdominal pain and bloating, with a score of 10 representing the most severe symptoms. Daily bowel movements were also reported.
The median baseline VAS score for pain was 6 in groups A and B. After 8 years of follow-up, the VAS scores for the two groups were 3 and 6, respectively (P less than .0001), and both bloating and daily bowel movements were significantly reduced in group A (P less than .0001).
As for the impact of rifaximin on other outcomes, acute diverticulitis occurred in 9 patients in group A (2.6%) and in 21 patients in group B (4.5%), a difference that reached statistical significance (P = .155). In addition, four patients (1.2%) in group A and nine patients (1.9%) in group B had surgery (P = .432). No disease-related deaths occurred in group A, but two patients in group B died (0.4%; P = .239). No side effects were recorded during the entire study period.
The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
REPORTING FROM DDW 2019
Key clinical point: “Real-life” data show a benefit of rifaximin on symptoms and complications experienced by patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease of the colon.
Major finding: Acute diverticulitis occurred in 9 patients in the rifaximin group (2.6%) and in 21 patients who did not receive rifaximin (4.5%), a difference that reached statistical significance (P = .155).
Study details: A retrospective study of 816 patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease.
Disclosures: The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
PPI metabolism may be altered in about one-third of bariatric surgery candidates
SAN DIEGO – Rapid proton pump inhibitor (PPI) metabolism was present in nearly one-third of patients who underwent bariatric surgery, results from a small, single-center study showed. Patients who were fast metabolizers also exhibited a higher, although not significant, incidence of early marginal ulceration following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
“Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] is one of the most effective surgical approaches to mitigating obesity and its attendant comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, reflux, and sleep apnea,” lead study author Sabrena F. Noria, MD, PhD, said in an interview at the annual Digestive Disease Week. “However, as with all surgeries, there are associated risks, the more common of which is marginal ulceration, or ulcer formation at the gastrojejunostomy, which occurs at a rate of 1%-16%.”
Dr. Noria, surgical research director of the comprehensive weight management, metabolic/bariatric surgery program at the Ohio State University’s Wexner Medical Center, noted that marginal ulcers (MUs) are divided into early (within 90 days) and late (more than 90 days), based on their time of onset after surgery, and are usually diagnosed during upper endoscopy on postoperative patients who complain of epigastric pain, dysphagia, nausea/vomiting, and/or dehydration.
“Given that MUs are associated with multiple hospital readmissions for pain and dehydration, multiple diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures, and escalation in both antiulcer and analgesic medication, their clinical impact cannot be overstated, especially since RYGB is the second most commonly performed bariatric procedure in the U.S.,” she said. “Given that the majority of marginal ulcers occur early after surgery, bariatric surgery programs have adopted the prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors for up to 90 days postoperatively. While studies have demonstrated up to a two-fold decrease in ulcer formation, sample heterogeneity, in terms of combining both early and late ulcers, make it difficult to determine the effect on early ulcer formation.”
In an effort to compare preoperative endoscopic findings and MU formation in patients with and without altered PPI metabolism, the researchers prospectively enrolled 94 bariatric patients to undergo genetic testing pertinent to drug metabolism for a comprehensive panel of medications using a commercially available pharmacogenetic testing kit for the activity of cytochrome P450 in drug metabolism. They grouped patients by whether they were fast or normal metabolizers, and compared preoperative endoscopic findings for patients on PPIs at baseline and rates of early (within 90 days) and late ulceration (between 90 and 180 days).
Dr. Noria reported that 28 patients (30%) in the entire cohort met criteria for being fast metabolizers. The researchers observed no differences in baseline body mass index, age, gender, or former smoking status between both groups. Among those treated with a PPI at baseline, fast metabolizers demonstrated a trend toward a higher incidence of gastritis on preoperative endoscopy, compared with controls (89% vs. 65%, respectively; P = .12), while detection of Helicobacter pylori and Barrett’s esophagus were nonsignificant between groups. Eight patients (17%) who underwent RYGB developed marginal ulcers within 6 months of the index operation, of which four (50%) were diagnosed within 90 days and categorized as early ulcers. Development of early ulceration was higher among fast metabolizers, compared with controls (13% vs. 6%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .60). All late ulcerations occurred within the control group.
“While none of our findings are statistically significant given the small sample size, there were two findings I found clinically compelling,” Dr. Noria said. “First, in the group of patients who were on PPIs preoperatively, we found a 24% increase in the presence of pathologically diagnosed gastritis in the rapid-metabolizer group, during screening endoscopy. This suggests that either these patients were undertreated or were not treated with the appropriate medication. The second interesting finding was an over doubling of early ulcer formation in the RYGB group who were rapid metabolizers. However, again I would caution against drawing any real conclusions as our sample size was not powered to detect any difference.”
She also acknowledged that the study was limited by the inability to determine the effect of confounders such as surgical approach and the lack of randomization.
Anahita D. Jalilvand, MD, a general surgery resident, postdoctoral research fellow, and PhD candidate, was instrumental to this study, Dr. Noria said.
The trial was sponsored by Pathnostics, a pharmacogenetic testing company, who covered the cost of the tests. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Rapid proton pump inhibitor (PPI) metabolism was present in nearly one-third of patients who underwent bariatric surgery, results from a small, single-center study showed. Patients who were fast metabolizers also exhibited a higher, although not significant, incidence of early marginal ulceration following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
“Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] is one of the most effective surgical approaches to mitigating obesity and its attendant comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, reflux, and sleep apnea,” lead study author Sabrena F. Noria, MD, PhD, said in an interview at the annual Digestive Disease Week. “However, as with all surgeries, there are associated risks, the more common of which is marginal ulceration, or ulcer formation at the gastrojejunostomy, which occurs at a rate of 1%-16%.”
Dr. Noria, surgical research director of the comprehensive weight management, metabolic/bariatric surgery program at the Ohio State University’s Wexner Medical Center, noted that marginal ulcers (MUs) are divided into early (within 90 days) and late (more than 90 days), based on their time of onset after surgery, and are usually diagnosed during upper endoscopy on postoperative patients who complain of epigastric pain, dysphagia, nausea/vomiting, and/or dehydration.
“Given that MUs are associated with multiple hospital readmissions for pain and dehydration, multiple diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures, and escalation in both antiulcer and analgesic medication, their clinical impact cannot be overstated, especially since RYGB is the second most commonly performed bariatric procedure in the U.S.,” she said. “Given that the majority of marginal ulcers occur early after surgery, bariatric surgery programs have adopted the prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors for up to 90 days postoperatively. While studies have demonstrated up to a two-fold decrease in ulcer formation, sample heterogeneity, in terms of combining both early and late ulcers, make it difficult to determine the effect on early ulcer formation.”
In an effort to compare preoperative endoscopic findings and MU formation in patients with and without altered PPI metabolism, the researchers prospectively enrolled 94 bariatric patients to undergo genetic testing pertinent to drug metabolism for a comprehensive panel of medications using a commercially available pharmacogenetic testing kit for the activity of cytochrome P450 in drug metabolism. They grouped patients by whether they were fast or normal metabolizers, and compared preoperative endoscopic findings for patients on PPIs at baseline and rates of early (within 90 days) and late ulceration (between 90 and 180 days).
Dr. Noria reported that 28 patients (30%) in the entire cohort met criteria for being fast metabolizers. The researchers observed no differences in baseline body mass index, age, gender, or former smoking status between both groups. Among those treated with a PPI at baseline, fast metabolizers demonstrated a trend toward a higher incidence of gastritis on preoperative endoscopy, compared with controls (89% vs. 65%, respectively; P = .12), while detection of Helicobacter pylori and Barrett’s esophagus were nonsignificant between groups. Eight patients (17%) who underwent RYGB developed marginal ulcers within 6 months of the index operation, of which four (50%) were diagnosed within 90 days and categorized as early ulcers. Development of early ulceration was higher among fast metabolizers, compared with controls (13% vs. 6%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .60). All late ulcerations occurred within the control group.
“While none of our findings are statistically significant given the small sample size, there were two findings I found clinically compelling,” Dr. Noria said. “First, in the group of patients who were on PPIs preoperatively, we found a 24% increase in the presence of pathologically diagnosed gastritis in the rapid-metabolizer group, during screening endoscopy. This suggests that either these patients were undertreated or were not treated with the appropriate medication. The second interesting finding was an over doubling of early ulcer formation in the RYGB group who were rapid metabolizers. However, again I would caution against drawing any real conclusions as our sample size was not powered to detect any difference.”
She also acknowledged that the study was limited by the inability to determine the effect of confounders such as surgical approach and the lack of randomization.
Anahita D. Jalilvand, MD, a general surgery resident, postdoctoral research fellow, and PhD candidate, was instrumental to this study, Dr. Noria said.
The trial was sponsored by Pathnostics, a pharmacogenetic testing company, who covered the cost of the tests. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SAN DIEGO – Rapid proton pump inhibitor (PPI) metabolism was present in nearly one-third of patients who underwent bariatric surgery, results from a small, single-center study showed. Patients who were fast metabolizers also exhibited a higher, although not significant, incidence of early marginal ulceration following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
“Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] is one of the most effective surgical approaches to mitigating obesity and its attendant comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, reflux, and sleep apnea,” lead study author Sabrena F. Noria, MD, PhD, said in an interview at the annual Digestive Disease Week. “However, as with all surgeries, there are associated risks, the more common of which is marginal ulceration, or ulcer formation at the gastrojejunostomy, which occurs at a rate of 1%-16%.”
Dr. Noria, surgical research director of the comprehensive weight management, metabolic/bariatric surgery program at the Ohio State University’s Wexner Medical Center, noted that marginal ulcers (MUs) are divided into early (within 90 days) and late (more than 90 days), based on their time of onset after surgery, and are usually diagnosed during upper endoscopy on postoperative patients who complain of epigastric pain, dysphagia, nausea/vomiting, and/or dehydration.
“Given that MUs are associated with multiple hospital readmissions for pain and dehydration, multiple diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic procedures, and escalation in both antiulcer and analgesic medication, their clinical impact cannot be overstated, especially since RYGB is the second most commonly performed bariatric procedure in the U.S.,” she said. “Given that the majority of marginal ulcers occur early after surgery, bariatric surgery programs have adopted the prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors for up to 90 days postoperatively. While studies have demonstrated up to a two-fold decrease in ulcer formation, sample heterogeneity, in terms of combining both early and late ulcers, make it difficult to determine the effect on early ulcer formation.”
In an effort to compare preoperative endoscopic findings and MU formation in patients with and without altered PPI metabolism, the researchers prospectively enrolled 94 bariatric patients to undergo genetic testing pertinent to drug metabolism for a comprehensive panel of medications using a commercially available pharmacogenetic testing kit for the activity of cytochrome P450 in drug metabolism. They grouped patients by whether they were fast or normal metabolizers, and compared preoperative endoscopic findings for patients on PPIs at baseline and rates of early (within 90 days) and late ulceration (between 90 and 180 days).
Dr. Noria reported that 28 patients (30%) in the entire cohort met criteria for being fast metabolizers. The researchers observed no differences in baseline body mass index, age, gender, or former smoking status between both groups. Among those treated with a PPI at baseline, fast metabolizers demonstrated a trend toward a higher incidence of gastritis on preoperative endoscopy, compared with controls (89% vs. 65%, respectively; P = .12), while detection of Helicobacter pylori and Barrett’s esophagus were nonsignificant between groups. Eight patients (17%) who underwent RYGB developed marginal ulcers within 6 months of the index operation, of which four (50%) were diagnosed within 90 days and categorized as early ulcers. Development of early ulceration was higher among fast metabolizers, compared with controls (13% vs. 6%), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .60). All late ulcerations occurred within the control group.
“While none of our findings are statistically significant given the small sample size, there were two findings I found clinically compelling,” Dr. Noria said. “First, in the group of patients who were on PPIs preoperatively, we found a 24% increase in the presence of pathologically diagnosed gastritis in the rapid-metabolizer group, during screening endoscopy. This suggests that either these patients were undertreated or were not treated with the appropriate medication. The second interesting finding was an over doubling of early ulcer formation in the RYGB group who were rapid metabolizers. However, again I would caution against drawing any real conclusions as our sample size was not powered to detect any difference.”
She also acknowledged that the study was limited by the inability to determine the effect of confounders such as surgical approach and the lack of randomization.
Anahita D. Jalilvand, MD, a general surgery resident, postdoctoral research fellow, and PhD candidate, was instrumental to this study, Dr. Noria said.
The trial was sponsored by Pathnostics, a pharmacogenetic testing company, who covered the cost of the tests. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
REPORTING FROM DDW 2019
Systemic anticoagulation found to benefit acute pancreatitis patients
SAN DIEGO –
“Acute pancreatitis is a very common disease,” lead study author Yan Bi, MD, PhD, a senior associate consultant and assistant professor in the department of gastroenterology and hepatology at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla., said in an interview in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “It’s the number one GI cause for hospitalization. Unfortunately, even after decades of basic science and clinical research, there’s still no cure; there’s nothing to prevent it from happening. The only treatment we can offer is supportive care, which includes fluid hydration, pain control, and nutrition support.”
The pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis (AP) is complex, she continued, and represents a sequence of distinct and interconnected pathologic events. “Both animal data and human studies have shown that acute pancreatitis is a hypercoagulable state,” she said. “We hypothesize that coagulation plays important roles in the development of pancreatitis.”
To test their hypothesis, Dr. Bi and associates performed a retrospective study. They drew from the 2014 National Inpatient Sample to evaluate the effect of systemic anticoagulation prior to AP onset on outcomes of the condition. They used ICD-9 codes to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of AP as well as those who were taking systemic anticoagulation. The primary outcome was the odds of AP in patients taking systemic anticoagulation, compared with those who were not. Secondary outcomes were mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization charges and costs. The researchers used propensity score matching to create a 1:1 matching population for sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, and multivariate regression to adjust for patient ZIP code, income, hospital region, location, size, and teaching status.
Dr. Bi presented results from 442,535 patients with AP. Of these, 12,735 were on systemic anticoagulation prior to AP. Their mean age was 66 and 47% were female. After adjustment for confounders, patients on systemic anticoagulation prior to AP onset displayed a decreased odds of AP occurrence, compared with those who were not on anticoagulation (OR 0.56; P less than .01). In addition, patients on anticoagulation displayed improved outcomes in a number of variables, compared with their counterparts who were not on anticoagulation: mortality (OR 0.65), shock (OR 0.68), acute kidney injury (OR 0.83), ICU admission (OR 0.57), multiorgan failure (OR 0.85), and hospital charges (a mean reduction of $9,275), as well as AP induced by alcohol use (OR 0.26; P less than .01 for all associations). “These data suggest that the majority of AP associated with alcohol was prevented by anticoagulation medication,” Dr. Bi said. “This is very striking. Anticoagulation may hold promise in both the prevention and treatment of AP.”
To further prove their points, Dr. Bi teamed with Baoan Ji, MD, PhD, a basic research scientist at Mayo Clinic, and developed a humanized AP animal model. With this model, they showed that Pradaxa, a Food and Drug Administration–approved anticoagulant, is effective in experimental AP prevention and treatment. “We are currently enrolling patients into a prospective clinical trial to further prove this in humans,” Dr. Bi said. The experimental therapeutic study will be reported at DDW on May 20.
She cautioned against using systemic anticoagulants in this patient population before results of the trial currently underway at Mayo Clinic’s Florida campus are known. “That should be sometime in mid-2020,” she said. “And the bleeding risk should be carefully monitored when using anticoagulants.”
The researchers were supported by funding from the Mayo Clinic and the Department of Defense.
SOURCE: Bi Y et al. DDW 2019, Abstract Sa1381.
SAN DIEGO –
“Acute pancreatitis is a very common disease,” lead study author Yan Bi, MD, PhD, a senior associate consultant and assistant professor in the department of gastroenterology and hepatology at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla., said in an interview in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “It’s the number one GI cause for hospitalization. Unfortunately, even after decades of basic science and clinical research, there’s still no cure; there’s nothing to prevent it from happening. The only treatment we can offer is supportive care, which includes fluid hydration, pain control, and nutrition support.”
The pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis (AP) is complex, she continued, and represents a sequence of distinct and interconnected pathologic events. “Both animal data and human studies have shown that acute pancreatitis is a hypercoagulable state,” she said. “We hypothesize that coagulation plays important roles in the development of pancreatitis.”
To test their hypothesis, Dr. Bi and associates performed a retrospective study. They drew from the 2014 National Inpatient Sample to evaluate the effect of systemic anticoagulation prior to AP onset on outcomes of the condition. They used ICD-9 codes to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of AP as well as those who were taking systemic anticoagulation. The primary outcome was the odds of AP in patients taking systemic anticoagulation, compared with those who were not. Secondary outcomes were mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization charges and costs. The researchers used propensity score matching to create a 1:1 matching population for sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, and multivariate regression to adjust for patient ZIP code, income, hospital region, location, size, and teaching status.
Dr. Bi presented results from 442,535 patients with AP. Of these, 12,735 were on systemic anticoagulation prior to AP. Their mean age was 66 and 47% were female. After adjustment for confounders, patients on systemic anticoagulation prior to AP onset displayed a decreased odds of AP occurrence, compared with those who were not on anticoagulation (OR 0.56; P less than .01). In addition, patients on anticoagulation displayed improved outcomes in a number of variables, compared with their counterparts who were not on anticoagulation: mortality (OR 0.65), shock (OR 0.68), acute kidney injury (OR 0.83), ICU admission (OR 0.57), multiorgan failure (OR 0.85), and hospital charges (a mean reduction of $9,275), as well as AP induced by alcohol use (OR 0.26; P less than .01 for all associations). “These data suggest that the majority of AP associated with alcohol was prevented by anticoagulation medication,” Dr. Bi said. “This is very striking. Anticoagulation may hold promise in both the prevention and treatment of AP.”
To further prove their points, Dr. Bi teamed with Baoan Ji, MD, PhD, a basic research scientist at Mayo Clinic, and developed a humanized AP animal model. With this model, they showed that Pradaxa, a Food and Drug Administration–approved anticoagulant, is effective in experimental AP prevention and treatment. “We are currently enrolling patients into a prospective clinical trial to further prove this in humans,” Dr. Bi said. The experimental therapeutic study will be reported at DDW on May 20.
She cautioned against using systemic anticoagulants in this patient population before results of the trial currently underway at Mayo Clinic’s Florida campus are known. “That should be sometime in mid-2020,” she said. “And the bleeding risk should be carefully monitored when using anticoagulants.”
The researchers were supported by funding from the Mayo Clinic and the Department of Defense.
SOURCE: Bi Y et al. DDW 2019, Abstract Sa1381.
SAN DIEGO –
“Acute pancreatitis is a very common disease,” lead study author Yan Bi, MD, PhD, a senior associate consultant and assistant professor in the department of gastroenterology and hepatology at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla., said in an interview in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “It’s the number one GI cause for hospitalization. Unfortunately, even after decades of basic science and clinical research, there’s still no cure; there’s nothing to prevent it from happening. The only treatment we can offer is supportive care, which includes fluid hydration, pain control, and nutrition support.”
The pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis (AP) is complex, she continued, and represents a sequence of distinct and interconnected pathologic events. “Both animal data and human studies have shown that acute pancreatitis is a hypercoagulable state,” she said. “We hypothesize that coagulation plays important roles in the development of pancreatitis.”
To test their hypothesis, Dr. Bi and associates performed a retrospective study. They drew from the 2014 National Inpatient Sample to evaluate the effect of systemic anticoagulation prior to AP onset on outcomes of the condition. They used ICD-9 codes to identify patients with a primary diagnosis of AP as well as those who were taking systemic anticoagulation. The primary outcome was the odds of AP in patients taking systemic anticoagulation, compared with those who were not. Secondary outcomes were mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization charges and costs. The researchers used propensity score matching to create a 1:1 matching population for sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, and multivariate regression to adjust for patient ZIP code, income, hospital region, location, size, and teaching status.
Dr. Bi presented results from 442,535 patients with AP. Of these, 12,735 were on systemic anticoagulation prior to AP. Their mean age was 66 and 47% were female. After adjustment for confounders, patients on systemic anticoagulation prior to AP onset displayed a decreased odds of AP occurrence, compared with those who were not on anticoagulation (OR 0.56; P less than .01). In addition, patients on anticoagulation displayed improved outcomes in a number of variables, compared with their counterparts who were not on anticoagulation: mortality (OR 0.65), shock (OR 0.68), acute kidney injury (OR 0.83), ICU admission (OR 0.57), multiorgan failure (OR 0.85), and hospital charges (a mean reduction of $9,275), as well as AP induced by alcohol use (OR 0.26; P less than .01 for all associations). “These data suggest that the majority of AP associated with alcohol was prevented by anticoagulation medication,” Dr. Bi said. “This is very striking. Anticoagulation may hold promise in both the prevention and treatment of AP.”
To further prove their points, Dr. Bi teamed with Baoan Ji, MD, PhD, a basic research scientist at Mayo Clinic, and developed a humanized AP animal model. With this model, they showed that Pradaxa, a Food and Drug Administration–approved anticoagulant, is effective in experimental AP prevention and treatment. “We are currently enrolling patients into a prospective clinical trial to further prove this in humans,” Dr. Bi said. The experimental therapeutic study will be reported at DDW on May 20.
She cautioned against using systemic anticoagulants in this patient population before results of the trial currently underway at Mayo Clinic’s Florida campus are known. “That should be sometime in mid-2020,” she said. “And the bleeding risk should be carefully monitored when using anticoagulants.”
The researchers were supported by funding from the Mayo Clinic and the Department of Defense.
SOURCE: Bi Y et al. DDW 2019, Abstract Sa1381.
REPORTING FROM DDW 2019
Key clinical point: Anticoagulation may hold promise in both the prevention and treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP).
Major finding: Patients on systemic anticoagulation prior to AP onset displayed a decreased odds of AP occurrence, compared with those who were not on anticoagulation (OR 0.56; P less than .01).
Study details: A retrospective analysis of 442,535 patients with AP.
Disclosures: The researchers were supported by funding from the Mayo Clinic and the Department of Defense.
Source: Bi Y et al. DDW 2019, Abstract Sa1381.
Sustainable weight loss seen 5 years after endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty
The finding comes from the first long-term analysis of outcomes following endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, a relatively new, minimally invasive weight-loss procedure that offers patients an alternative to bariatric surgery.
“Endoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a 1-day outpatient procedure that uses a suturing device attached to an endoscope to create a series of sutures that cinch the stomach like an accordion down to roughly the size of a banana, and leaves no scars,” lead study author Reem Z. Sharaiha, MD, MSc, said during a media briefing in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week®. “The procedure causes patients to eat less because they feel full faster. This results in weight loss.”
Digestive Disease Week is jointly sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT).
While previous studies have tracked ESG results for 1-2 years, her research team followed 203 patients who underwent the procedure between August 2013 and October 2018. “We felt that a longer-term study was needed to make sure weight loss was sustainable with this method of treatment, because research shows that if you keep weight loss for an extended period of time, you’re more likely to keep it off permanently, which is ultimately what we want for these patients,” said Dr. Sharaiha, who is an attending physician at New York–Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York.
At baseline, the mean age of the 203 patients was 46 years, 67% were female, and their mean body mass index was 39 kg/m2. Dr. Sharaiha and colleagues observed that maximum weight loss was generally achieved by 24 months after the procedure, after which patients tended to regain a small amount of their lost weight. For example, at 1 year, the mean weight loss was 18.1 kg, with a total body weight loss of 15.2% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 2 years, the mean weight loss was 17.3 kg, with a total body weight loss of 14.5% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 3 years, the mean weight loss was 20.8 kg, with a total body weight loss of 14.5% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 5 years, the mean weight loss was 18.7 kg (P = .0003) and the total body weight loss was 14.5% (P = .0002).
Overall, patients gained an average 2.4 kg of weight after achieving their minimum weight after ESG until the end of follow-up. The researchers also found that failure to lose at least 10% of total body weight within the first 3 months after ESG decreased the chance of subsequent significant weight loss by 80%. Fewer than 1% of patients experienced complications, an improvement over surgical procedures.
“Our study showed very sustainable, significant weight loss for our patients between the 1 and 5 year mark,” Dr. Sharaiha said. “Out to 5 years, there was an average 15% total body weight loss. This is significant, because studies have shown that when people lose at least 10% of their body weight, they see improvement in blood pressure, diabetes, and heart outcomes, which are the comorbidities associated with obesity. We hope these findings will help persuade insurance companies that ESG is not experimental, but has value over patients’ lifespans.”
Dr. Sharaiha and colleagues plan to follow the current cohort for the next 10-20 years. “It’s important to show the value of these endoscopic procedures, so we’ll be looking at improvement in comorbidities such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and cholesterol,” she said. “We’re also part of a randomized study that’s currently under way looking at ESG in combination with diet and exercise.”
She reported having no financial disclosures.
The finding comes from the first long-term analysis of outcomes following endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, a relatively new, minimally invasive weight-loss procedure that offers patients an alternative to bariatric surgery.
“Endoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a 1-day outpatient procedure that uses a suturing device attached to an endoscope to create a series of sutures that cinch the stomach like an accordion down to roughly the size of a banana, and leaves no scars,” lead study author Reem Z. Sharaiha, MD, MSc, said during a media briefing in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week®. “The procedure causes patients to eat less because they feel full faster. This results in weight loss.”
Digestive Disease Week is jointly sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT).
While previous studies have tracked ESG results for 1-2 years, her research team followed 203 patients who underwent the procedure between August 2013 and October 2018. “We felt that a longer-term study was needed to make sure weight loss was sustainable with this method of treatment, because research shows that if you keep weight loss for an extended period of time, you’re more likely to keep it off permanently, which is ultimately what we want for these patients,” said Dr. Sharaiha, who is an attending physician at New York–Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York.
At baseline, the mean age of the 203 patients was 46 years, 67% were female, and their mean body mass index was 39 kg/m2. Dr. Sharaiha and colleagues observed that maximum weight loss was generally achieved by 24 months after the procedure, after which patients tended to regain a small amount of their lost weight. For example, at 1 year, the mean weight loss was 18.1 kg, with a total body weight loss of 15.2% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 2 years, the mean weight loss was 17.3 kg, with a total body weight loss of 14.5% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 3 years, the mean weight loss was 20.8 kg, with a total body weight loss of 14.5% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 5 years, the mean weight loss was 18.7 kg (P = .0003) and the total body weight loss was 14.5% (P = .0002).
Overall, patients gained an average 2.4 kg of weight after achieving their minimum weight after ESG until the end of follow-up. The researchers also found that failure to lose at least 10% of total body weight within the first 3 months after ESG decreased the chance of subsequent significant weight loss by 80%. Fewer than 1% of patients experienced complications, an improvement over surgical procedures.
“Our study showed very sustainable, significant weight loss for our patients between the 1 and 5 year mark,” Dr. Sharaiha said. “Out to 5 years, there was an average 15% total body weight loss. This is significant, because studies have shown that when people lose at least 10% of their body weight, they see improvement in blood pressure, diabetes, and heart outcomes, which are the comorbidities associated with obesity. We hope these findings will help persuade insurance companies that ESG is not experimental, but has value over patients’ lifespans.”
Dr. Sharaiha and colleagues plan to follow the current cohort for the next 10-20 years. “It’s important to show the value of these endoscopic procedures, so we’ll be looking at improvement in comorbidities such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and cholesterol,” she said. “We’re also part of a randomized study that’s currently under way looking at ESG in combination with diet and exercise.”
She reported having no financial disclosures.
The finding comes from the first long-term analysis of outcomes following endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, a relatively new, minimally invasive weight-loss procedure that offers patients an alternative to bariatric surgery.
“Endoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a 1-day outpatient procedure that uses a suturing device attached to an endoscope to create a series of sutures that cinch the stomach like an accordion down to roughly the size of a banana, and leaves no scars,” lead study author Reem Z. Sharaiha, MD, MSc, said during a media briefing in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week®. “The procedure causes patients to eat less because they feel full faster. This results in weight loss.”
Digestive Disease Week is jointly sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT).
While previous studies have tracked ESG results for 1-2 years, her research team followed 203 patients who underwent the procedure between August 2013 and October 2018. “We felt that a longer-term study was needed to make sure weight loss was sustainable with this method of treatment, because research shows that if you keep weight loss for an extended period of time, you’re more likely to keep it off permanently, which is ultimately what we want for these patients,” said Dr. Sharaiha, who is an attending physician at New York–Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York.
At baseline, the mean age of the 203 patients was 46 years, 67% were female, and their mean body mass index was 39 kg/m2. Dr. Sharaiha and colleagues observed that maximum weight loss was generally achieved by 24 months after the procedure, after which patients tended to regain a small amount of their lost weight. For example, at 1 year, the mean weight loss was 18.1 kg, with a total body weight loss of 15.2% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 2 years, the mean weight loss was 17.3 kg, with a total body weight loss of 14.5% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 3 years, the mean weight loss was 20.8 kg, with a total body weight loss of 14.5% (P less than .0001 for both associations). At 5 years, the mean weight loss was 18.7 kg (P = .0003) and the total body weight loss was 14.5% (P = .0002).
Overall, patients gained an average 2.4 kg of weight after achieving their minimum weight after ESG until the end of follow-up. The researchers also found that failure to lose at least 10% of total body weight within the first 3 months after ESG decreased the chance of subsequent significant weight loss by 80%. Fewer than 1% of patients experienced complications, an improvement over surgical procedures.
“Our study showed very sustainable, significant weight loss for our patients between the 1 and 5 year mark,” Dr. Sharaiha said. “Out to 5 years, there was an average 15% total body weight loss. This is significant, because studies have shown that when people lose at least 10% of their body weight, they see improvement in blood pressure, diabetes, and heart outcomes, which are the comorbidities associated with obesity. We hope these findings will help persuade insurance companies that ESG is not experimental, but has value over patients’ lifespans.”
Dr. Sharaiha and colleagues plan to follow the current cohort for the next 10-20 years. “It’s important to show the value of these endoscopic procedures, so we’ll be looking at improvement in comorbidities such as diabetes, high blood pressure, and cholesterol,” she said. “We’re also part of a randomized study that’s currently under way looking at ESG in combination with diet and exercise.”
She reported having no financial disclosures.
FROM DDW 2019
Key clinical point: Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty is an effective, minimally invasive weight-loss procedure that results in significant total body weight loss.
Major finding: Between 1 and 5 years after endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, patients lost 15%-20% of their total body weight.
Study details: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data on 203 patients.
Disclosures: Dr. Sharaiha reported having no financial disclosures.
Emerging data support anabolic-first regimens for severe osteoporosis
LOS ANGELES – In the opinion of Felicia Cosman, MD, the current state of osteoporosis treatment is fraught with clinical challenges.
First, most patients at highest risk for future fractures are not being treated. “In fact, fewer than 25% of patients with new clinical fractures are treated for their underlying disease,” Dr. Cosman, professor of medicine at Columbia University, New York, said at the annual scientific and clinical congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE).
“One of the reasons doctors are not treating these patients is that many of them do not have a T-score in the osteoporosis range. There’s a misunderstanding here. A fracture that occurs in people with low bone mass in the setting of minimal trauma – such as a fall from standing height – meets the criteria for the clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and qualifies a person for being at high risk of more fractures. This is likely because bone weakness or fragility is related not just to quantitative aspects, but also to structural and qualitative aspects that cannot be measured as easily.”
Another problem is that some of the highest-risk patients are those with a vertebral fracture. “However, vertebral fractures are particularly difficult to find and treat because they’re often asymptomatic and we’re not [identifying] these patients,” she said. “Targeted screening [with] spine imaging to find vertebral fractures is probably as important as BMD [bone mineral density] testing.”
To complicate matters, Dr. Cosman said that clinicians and patients “misunderstand the balance between benefits and risks of osteoporosis medications and they don’t consider the risk of not treating the underlying disease. Lastly, there’s little evidence to help guide long-term strategies. Guidelines across medical specialties are incredibly inconsistent. With the exception of guidelines from AACE, the one thing that they’re very consistent about is underrecognizing the value of anabolic therapy for people with severe osteoporosis.”
It is well known that previous bone fracture is the most important risk factor for a future fracture, but the recency of the fracture is also important. In a recent study, researchers followed 377,561 female Medicare beneficiaries with a first fracture for up to 5 years (Osteoporos Int. 2019;30[1]:79-92). They found that at 1 year, the risk of another fracture was 10%. The fracture risk rose to 18% at 2 years, and to 31% at 5 years. “I like to think of this as the osteoporosis emergency,” said Dr. Cosman, co–editor-in-chief of Osteoporosis International. “We need to treat these people right away to prevent more fractures and related disability, morbidity, and mortality.”
According to data from pivotal trials, the anabolic agents teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab appear to produce more rapid and larger effects against all fractures, compared with even the best antiresorptive agents. “However, comparing across studies can be problematic, because the different populations have varying baseline characteristics and different underlying risk,” Dr. Cosman said. “The protocols and the outcome definitions might be different. It’s better to compare anabolic agents with antiresorptive agents in head-to-head trials, and we now have a few of these.”
Two trials are older studies in which fracture outcomes were not the primary endpoints. One study evaluated a population of patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and found that over 18 months, teriparatide reduced vertebral fractures by 90%, compared with alendronate (N Engl J Med. 2007;357[20]:2028-39). The other trial focused on a population of patients with acute, painful vertebral fractures. It found that over 1 year, teriparatide reduced vertebral fractures by 50%, compared with risedronate (Osteoporos Int. 2012;23[8]:2141-50). Two more recent studies compared anabolic and antiresorptive therapies on fracture outcomes as primary endpoints in patients with prevalent fractures. The VERO trial compared teriparatide with risedronate (Lancet. 2018;391[10117]:230-40), and ARCH compared romosozumab with alendronate (N Engl J Med. 2017;377[15]:1417-27).
In VERO, 1,360 patients with a prevalent vertebral fracture were randomized to receive teriparatide or risedronate for 2 years. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture was 3.1% and 6% in the teriparatide and risedronate groups, respectively, a pattern that held true at 24 months (6.4% vs. 12%). The study also showed that the number of nonvertebral fractures was significantly lower in teriparatide-treated patients, compared with those on risedronate. In ARCH, 4,093 postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture were randomized to receive romosozumab or alendronate for 1 year and then followed for a median period of 33 months. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture was 4% and 6.3% in the romosozumab and alendronate groups, respectively, a pattern that held true at 24 months (6.2% vs. 11.9%).
“These trials showed that the antifracture effects are faster and larger with anabolic agents, compared with antiresorptive agents,” Dr. Cosman said. “They also showed that antifracture effects are sustained after transition to antiresorptive therapy.” In ARCH, both nonvertebral and hip fracture incidences were lower in the romosozumab group, compared with the alendronate group.
The trials demonstrated that improving total hip BMD is associated with improved bone strength and resistance to fracture, yet treatment sequence matters. “The greatest BMD gains of the hip are seen when anabolic agents are used first-line, followed by a potent antiresorptive agent,” she said.
Dr. Cosman offered a strategy for patients on potent antiresorptive agents who need anabolic medication. In patients on bisphosphonates, especially with an incident hip fracture or very low hip BMD, consider combination therapy with initiation of teriparatide or abaloparatide, along with an antiresorptive agent. “There are very little data addressing patients on denosumab, but I would suggest perhaps adding teriparatide or abaloparatide in this population, and continuing denosumab,” she said. “That could lead to BMD gain. Switching to romosozumab might also be an option. But, if possible, use an anabolic agent first. The role of anabolic medication for osteoporosis is evolving as evidence continues to suggest superior benefit of anabolic-first regimens for high-risk patients.”
Dr. Cosman disclosed that she has received advising, consulting, and speaking fees from Amgen and Radius. She has received consulting fees from Tarsa and research grants and medication from Amgen.
LOS ANGELES – In the opinion of Felicia Cosman, MD, the current state of osteoporosis treatment is fraught with clinical challenges.
First, most patients at highest risk for future fractures are not being treated. “In fact, fewer than 25% of patients with new clinical fractures are treated for their underlying disease,” Dr. Cosman, professor of medicine at Columbia University, New York, said at the annual scientific and clinical congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE).
“One of the reasons doctors are not treating these patients is that many of them do not have a T-score in the osteoporosis range. There’s a misunderstanding here. A fracture that occurs in people with low bone mass in the setting of minimal trauma – such as a fall from standing height – meets the criteria for the clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and qualifies a person for being at high risk of more fractures. This is likely because bone weakness or fragility is related not just to quantitative aspects, but also to structural and qualitative aspects that cannot be measured as easily.”
Another problem is that some of the highest-risk patients are those with a vertebral fracture. “However, vertebral fractures are particularly difficult to find and treat because they’re often asymptomatic and we’re not [identifying] these patients,” she said. “Targeted screening [with] spine imaging to find vertebral fractures is probably as important as BMD [bone mineral density] testing.”
To complicate matters, Dr. Cosman said that clinicians and patients “misunderstand the balance between benefits and risks of osteoporosis medications and they don’t consider the risk of not treating the underlying disease. Lastly, there’s little evidence to help guide long-term strategies. Guidelines across medical specialties are incredibly inconsistent. With the exception of guidelines from AACE, the one thing that they’re very consistent about is underrecognizing the value of anabolic therapy for people with severe osteoporosis.”
It is well known that previous bone fracture is the most important risk factor for a future fracture, but the recency of the fracture is also important. In a recent study, researchers followed 377,561 female Medicare beneficiaries with a first fracture for up to 5 years (Osteoporos Int. 2019;30[1]:79-92). They found that at 1 year, the risk of another fracture was 10%. The fracture risk rose to 18% at 2 years, and to 31% at 5 years. “I like to think of this as the osteoporosis emergency,” said Dr. Cosman, co–editor-in-chief of Osteoporosis International. “We need to treat these people right away to prevent more fractures and related disability, morbidity, and mortality.”
According to data from pivotal trials, the anabolic agents teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab appear to produce more rapid and larger effects against all fractures, compared with even the best antiresorptive agents. “However, comparing across studies can be problematic, because the different populations have varying baseline characteristics and different underlying risk,” Dr. Cosman said. “The protocols and the outcome definitions might be different. It’s better to compare anabolic agents with antiresorptive agents in head-to-head trials, and we now have a few of these.”
Two trials are older studies in which fracture outcomes were not the primary endpoints. One study evaluated a population of patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and found that over 18 months, teriparatide reduced vertebral fractures by 90%, compared with alendronate (N Engl J Med. 2007;357[20]:2028-39). The other trial focused on a population of patients with acute, painful vertebral fractures. It found that over 1 year, teriparatide reduced vertebral fractures by 50%, compared with risedronate (Osteoporos Int. 2012;23[8]:2141-50). Two more recent studies compared anabolic and antiresorptive therapies on fracture outcomes as primary endpoints in patients with prevalent fractures. The VERO trial compared teriparatide with risedronate (Lancet. 2018;391[10117]:230-40), and ARCH compared romosozumab with alendronate (N Engl J Med. 2017;377[15]:1417-27).
In VERO, 1,360 patients with a prevalent vertebral fracture were randomized to receive teriparatide or risedronate for 2 years. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture was 3.1% and 6% in the teriparatide and risedronate groups, respectively, a pattern that held true at 24 months (6.4% vs. 12%). The study also showed that the number of nonvertebral fractures was significantly lower in teriparatide-treated patients, compared with those on risedronate. In ARCH, 4,093 postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture were randomized to receive romosozumab or alendronate for 1 year and then followed for a median period of 33 months. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture was 4% and 6.3% in the romosozumab and alendronate groups, respectively, a pattern that held true at 24 months (6.2% vs. 11.9%).
“These trials showed that the antifracture effects are faster and larger with anabolic agents, compared with antiresorptive agents,” Dr. Cosman said. “They also showed that antifracture effects are sustained after transition to antiresorptive therapy.” In ARCH, both nonvertebral and hip fracture incidences were lower in the romosozumab group, compared with the alendronate group.
The trials demonstrated that improving total hip BMD is associated with improved bone strength and resistance to fracture, yet treatment sequence matters. “The greatest BMD gains of the hip are seen when anabolic agents are used first-line, followed by a potent antiresorptive agent,” she said.
Dr. Cosman offered a strategy for patients on potent antiresorptive agents who need anabolic medication. In patients on bisphosphonates, especially with an incident hip fracture or very low hip BMD, consider combination therapy with initiation of teriparatide or abaloparatide, along with an antiresorptive agent. “There are very little data addressing patients on denosumab, but I would suggest perhaps adding teriparatide or abaloparatide in this population, and continuing denosumab,” she said. “That could lead to BMD gain. Switching to romosozumab might also be an option. But, if possible, use an anabolic agent first. The role of anabolic medication for osteoporosis is evolving as evidence continues to suggest superior benefit of anabolic-first regimens for high-risk patients.”
Dr. Cosman disclosed that she has received advising, consulting, and speaking fees from Amgen and Radius. She has received consulting fees from Tarsa and research grants and medication from Amgen.
LOS ANGELES – In the opinion of Felicia Cosman, MD, the current state of osteoporosis treatment is fraught with clinical challenges.
First, most patients at highest risk for future fractures are not being treated. “In fact, fewer than 25% of patients with new clinical fractures are treated for their underlying disease,” Dr. Cosman, professor of medicine at Columbia University, New York, said at the annual scientific and clinical congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE).
“One of the reasons doctors are not treating these patients is that many of them do not have a T-score in the osteoporosis range. There’s a misunderstanding here. A fracture that occurs in people with low bone mass in the setting of minimal trauma – such as a fall from standing height – meets the criteria for the clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis and qualifies a person for being at high risk of more fractures. This is likely because bone weakness or fragility is related not just to quantitative aspects, but also to structural and qualitative aspects that cannot be measured as easily.”
Another problem is that some of the highest-risk patients are those with a vertebral fracture. “However, vertebral fractures are particularly difficult to find and treat because they’re often asymptomatic and we’re not [identifying] these patients,” she said. “Targeted screening [with] spine imaging to find vertebral fractures is probably as important as BMD [bone mineral density] testing.”
To complicate matters, Dr. Cosman said that clinicians and patients “misunderstand the balance between benefits and risks of osteoporosis medications and they don’t consider the risk of not treating the underlying disease. Lastly, there’s little evidence to help guide long-term strategies. Guidelines across medical specialties are incredibly inconsistent. With the exception of guidelines from AACE, the one thing that they’re very consistent about is underrecognizing the value of anabolic therapy for people with severe osteoporosis.”
It is well known that previous bone fracture is the most important risk factor for a future fracture, but the recency of the fracture is also important. In a recent study, researchers followed 377,561 female Medicare beneficiaries with a first fracture for up to 5 years (Osteoporos Int. 2019;30[1]:79-92). They found that at 1 year, the risk of another fracture was 10%. The fracture risk rose to 18% at 2 years, and to 31% at 5 years. “I like to think of this as the osteoporosis emergency,” said Dr. Cosman, co–editor-in-chief of Osteoporosis International. “We need to treat these people right away to prevent more fractures and related disability, morbidity, and mortality.”
According to data from pivotal trials, the anabolic agents teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab appear to produce more rapid and larger effects against all fractures, compared with even the best antiresorptive agents. “However, comparing across studies can be problematic, because the different populations have varying baseline characteristics and different underlying risk,” Dr. Cosman said. “The protocols and the outcome definitions might be different. It’s better to compare anabolic agents with antiresorptive agents in head-to-head trials, and we now have a few of these.”
Two trials are older studies in which fracture outcomes were not the primary endpoints. One study evaluated a population of patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and found that over 18 months, teriparatide reduced vertebral fractures by 90%, compared with alendronate (N Engl J Med. 2007;357[20]:2028-39). The other trial focused on a population of patients with acute, painful vertebral fractures. It found that over 1 year, teriparatide reduced vertebral fractures by 50%, compared with risedronate (Osteoporos Int. 2012;23[8]:2141-50). Two more recent studies compared anabolic and antiresorptive therapies on fracture outcomes as primary endpoints in patients with prevalent fractures. The VERO trial compared teriparatide with risedronate (Lancet. 2018;391[10117]:230-40), and ARCH compared romosozumab with alendronate (N Engl J Med. 2017;377[15]:1417-27).
In VERO, 1,360 patients with a prevalent vertebral fracture were randomized to receive teriparatide or risedronate for 2 years. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture was 3.1% and 6% in the teriparatide and risedronate groups, respectively, a pattern that held true at 24 months (6.4% vs. 12%). The study also showed that the number of nonvertebral fractures was significantly lower in teriparatide-treated patients, compared with those on risedronate. In ARCH, 4,093 postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture were randomized to receive romosozumab or alendronate for 1 year and then followed for a median period of 33 months. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture was 4% and 6.3% in the romosozumab and alendronate groups, respectively, a pattern that held true at 24 months (6.2% vs. 11.9%).
“These trials showed that the antifracture effects are faster and larger with anabolic agents, compared with antiresorptive agents,” Dr. Cosman said. “They also showed that antifracture effects are sustained after transition to antiresorptive therapy.” In ARCH, both nonvertebral and hip fracture incidences were lower in the romosozumab group, compared with the alendronate group.
The trials demonstrated that improving total hip BMD is associated with improved bone strength and resistance to fracture, yet treatment sequence matters. “The greatest BMD gains of the hip are seen when anabolic agents are used first-line, followed by a potent antiresorptive agent,” she said.
Dr. Cosman offered a strategy for patients on potent antiresorptive agents who need anabolic medication. In patients on bisphosphonates, especially with an incident hip fracture or very low hip BMD, consider combination therapy with initiation of teriparatide or abaloparatide, along with an antiresorptive agent. “There are very little data addressing patients on denosumab, but I would suggest perhaps adding teriparatide or abaloparatide in this population, and continuing denosumab,” she said. “That could lead to BMD gain. Switching to romosozumab might also be an option. But, if possible, use an anabolic agent first. The role of anabolic medication for osteoporosis is evolving as evidence continues to suggest superior benefit of anabolic-first regimens for high-risk patients.”
Dr. Cosman disclosed that she has received advising, consulting, and speaking fees from Amgen and Radius. She has received consulting fees from Tarsa and research grants and medication from Amgen.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AACE 2019
Study finds link between intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and risk of NAFLD
Patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) were nearly six times more likely to have a diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than were controls, results from a retrospective, single-center study demonstrated.
“If this connection is confirmed with future studies, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy may prove a novel model through which to investigate bile acid metabolism in patients with fatty liver disease,” one of the study authors, Tatyana Kushner, MD, MSCE, said during a media briefing in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “This could have implications for future management of fatty liver disease. Additionally, these findings suggest that ICP patients should be seen by a liver specialist because they may go on to develop chronic liver disease or may already have already existing underlying liver disease.”
ICP is characterized by a build-up of bile acids during pregnancy and is associated with an increased risk of negative fetal outcomes and fetal death if left untreated, said Dr. Kushner, of the division of liver diseases at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. The most notable symptom during pregnancy is severe pruritus. In what is believed to be the first study of its kind, Dr. Kushner and colleagues set out to evaluate the association between ICP and NAFLD and associated metabolic risk factors, including obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes. Between January and December of 2017, they drew from the electronic medical records of a New York City health system to identify 149 pregnancies complicated by ICP and compared them to a control group of 200 pregnancies without an ICP diagnosis. The researchers used Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to evaluate association of ICP with categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively, and unadjusted odds ratios to compare the ICP and control groups for clinically significant outcomes.
The median age of the study population was 30 years, their mean body mass index was 27.5 kg/m2, and there was a higher proportion of Hispanic women in the ICP group, compared with the control group (75% vs. 62%, respectively). Dr. Kushner and colleagues found that Hispanic women were nearly twice as likely to be diagnosed with ICP than non-Hispanic women (OR, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-3.03). However, patients in both the ICP and control groups were similar for median age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06), nulliparity (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.30), and prevalence of hepatitis C (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.08-21.67). The two groups were also similar for certain metabolic risk factors, including prevalence of obesity (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-1.61), hypertension (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.31-1.52), hemoglobin A1c greater than 5.5% (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34-1.9), and total cholesterol above 200 mg/dL (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 0.83-20.84). Median bile acid levels were 30.6 micromoles (interquartile range, 11.6, 32.7) in the ICP group.
Compared with patients in the control group, those in the ICP group had higher median levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (32 vs. 16 U/L; P less than .0001), alkaline phosphatase (181 vs. 128 U/L; P less than .0001), and total bilirubin (0.5 vs. 0.35 mg/dL; P less than .0001). ICP patients were also more likely than their counterparts to have ALT levels above 50 U/L (two times the upper limit of normal; OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.48-7.03), a history of biliary disease (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.39-7.80), and to have evidence of steatosis on liver imaging (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.68-13.12). When the researchers evaluated a diagnosis of NAFLD based on ICD-10 codes or evidence of steatosis on liver imaging, ICP patients were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of NAFLD than controls (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.08-15.65).
“We recommend additional research to look at differences in NAFLD progression in women who had NAFLD and were later diagnosed with ICP, compared to women with NAFLD who did not go on to develop ICP, because that may be a reflection of the role that bile acid metabolism plays in these particular patients,” Dr. Kushner said.
Digestive Disease Week is jointly sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT).
The study’s primary author was Erica Monrose, MD. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Monrose E et al. DDW 2019, Abstract Sa1562.
Patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) were nearly six times more likely to have a diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than were controls, results from a retrospective, single-center study demonstrated.
“If this connection is confirmed with future studies, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy may prove a novel model through which to investigate bile acid metabolism in patients with fatty liver disease,” one of the study authors, Tatyana Kushner, MD, MSCE, said during a media briefing in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “This could have implications for future management of fatty liver disease. Additionally, these findings suggest that ICP patients should be seen by a liver specialist because they may go on to develop chronic liver disease or may already have already existing underlying liver disease.”
ICP is characterized by a build-up of bile acids during pregnancy and is associated with an increased risk of negative fetal outcomes and fetal death if left untreated, said Dr. Kushner, of the division of liver diseases at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. The most notable symptom during pregnancy is severe pruritus. In what is believed to be the first study of its kind, Dr. Kushner and colleagues set out to evaluate the association between ICP and NAFLD and associated metabolic risk factors, including obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes. Between January and December of 2017, they drew from the electronic medical records of a New York City health system to identify 149 pregnancies complicated by ICP and compared them to a control group of 200 pregnancies without an ICP diagnosis. The researchers used Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to evaluate association of ICP with categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively, and unadjusted odds ratios to compare the ICP and control groups for clinically significant outcomes.
The median age of the study population was 30 years, their mean body mass index was 27.5 kg/m2, and there was a higher proportion of Hispanic women in the ICP group, compared with the control group (75% vs. 62%, respectively). Dr. Kushner and colleagues found that Hispanic women were nearly twice as likely to be diagnosed with ICP than non-Hispanic women (OR, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-3.03). However, patients in both the ICP and control groups were similar for median age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06), nulliparity (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.30), and prevalence of hepatitis C (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.08-21.67). The two groups were also similar for certain metabolic risk factors, including prevalence of obesity (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-1.61), hypertension (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.31-1.52), hemoglobin A1c greater than 5.5% (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34-1.9), and total cholesterol above 200 mg/dL (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 0.83-20.84). Median bile acid levels were 30.6 micromoles (interquartile range, 11.6, 32.7) in the ICP group.
Compared with patients in the control group, those in the ICP group had higher median levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (32 vs. 16 U/L; P less than .0001), alkaline phosphatase (181 vs. 128 U/L; P less than .0001), and total bilirubin (0.5 vs. 0.35 mg/dL; P less than .0001). ICP patients were also more likely than their counterparts to have ALT levels above 50 U/L (two times the upper limit of normal; OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.48-7.03), a history of biliary disease (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.39-7.80), and to have evidence of steatosis on liver imaging (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.68-13.12). When the researchers evaluated a diagnosis of NAFLD based on ICD-10 codes or evidence of steatosis on liver imaging, ICP patients were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of NAFLD than controls (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.08-15.65).
“We recommend additional research to look at differences in NAFLD progression in women who had NAFLD and were later diagnosed with ICP, compared to women with NAFLD who did not go on to develop ICP, because that may be a reflection of the role that bile acid metabolism plays in these particular patients,” Dr. Kushner said.
Digestive Disease Week is jointly sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT).
The study’s primary author was Erica Monrose, MD. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Monrose E et al. DDW 2019, Abstract Sa1562.
Patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) were nearly six times more likely to have a diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than were controls, results from a retrospective, single-center study demonstrated.
“If this connection is confirmed with future studies, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy may prove a novel model through which to investigate bile acid metabolism in patients with fatty liver disease,” one of the study authors, Tatyana Kushner, MD, MSCE, said during a media briefing in advance of the annual Digestive Disease Week. “This could have implications for future management of fatty liver disease. Additionally, these findings suggest that ICP patients should be seen by a liver specialist because they may go on to develop chronic liver disease or may already have already existing underlying liver disease.”
ICP is characterized by a build-up of bile acids during pregnancy and is associated with an increased risk of negative fetal outcomes and fetal death if left untreated, said Dr. Kushner, of the division of liver diseases at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. The most notable symptom during pregnancy is severe pruritus. In what is believed to be the first study of its kind, Dr. Kushner and colleagues set out to evaluate the association between ICP and NAFLD and associated metabolic risk factors, including obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes. Between January and December of 2017, they drew from the electronic medical records of a New York City health system to identify 149 pregnancies complicated by ICP and compared them to a control group of 200 pregnancies without an ICP diagnosis. The researchers used Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests to evaluate association of ICP with categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively, and unadjusted odds ratios to compare the ICP and control groups for clinically significant outcomes.
The median age of the study population was 30 years, their mean body mass index was 27.5 kg/m2, and there was a higher proportion of Hispanic women in the ICP group, compared with the control group (75% vs. 62%, respectively). Dr. Kushner and colleagues found that Hispanic women were nearly twice as likely to be diagnosed with ICP than non-Hispanic women (OR, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-3.03). However, patients in both the ICP and control groups were similar for median age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06), nulliparity (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48-1.30), and prevalence of hepatitis C (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.08-21.67). The two groups were also similar for certain metabolic risk factors, including prevalence of obesity (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.62-1.61), hypertension (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.31-1.52), hemoglobin A1c greater than 5.5% (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.34-1.9), and total cholesterol above 200 mg/dL (OR, 4.15; 95% CI, 0.83-20.84). Median bile acid levels were 30.6 micromoles (interquartile range, 11.6, 32.7) in the ICP group.
Compared with patients in the control group, those in the ICP group had higher median levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (32 vs. 16 U/L; P less than .0001), alkaline phosphatase (181 vs. 128 U/L; P less than .0001), and total bilirubin (0.5 vs. 0.35 mg/dL; P less than .0001). ICP patients were also more likely than their counterparts to have ALT levels above 50 U/L (two times the upper limit of normal; OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.48-7.03), a history of biliary disease (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.39-7.80), and to have evidence of steatosis on liver imaging (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 1.68-13.12). When the researchers evaluated a diagnosis of NAFLD based on ICD-10 codes or evidence of steatosis on liver imaging, ICP patients were significantly more likely to have a diagnosis of NAFLD than controls (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.08-15.65).
“We recommend additional research to look at differences in NAFLD progression in women who had NAFLD and were later diagnosed with ICP, compared to women with NAFLD who did not go on to develop ICP, because that may be a reflection of the role that bile acid metabolism plays in these particular patients,” Dr. Kushner said.
Digestive Disease Week is jointly sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract (SSAT).
The study’s primary author was Erica Monrose, MD. The researchers reported having no financial disclosures.
SOURCE: Monrose E et al. DDW 2019, Abstract Sa1562.
REPORTING FROM DDW 2019
Type 2 diabetes remission: Reducing excess fat in the liver might be the key
LOS ANGELES – More than 20 years ago, Roy Taylor, MD, began working to further understand the pathogenesis of hepatic insulin resistance in people with type 2 diabetes. It became clear that the main determinant was the amount of fat in the liver.
“If you reduced the amount of fat, the resistance went down,” Dr. Taylor, professor of medicine and metabolism at Newcastle University (England), said at the annual scientific and clinical congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. “We had a very clear picture of what might be controlling this awful matter of fasting glucose being too high.”
Then, Dr. Taylor read a study from Caterina Guidone, MD, and colleagues in Italy, which found that 1 week after patients with type 2 diabetes underwent gastric bypass surgery, their fasting plasma glucose levels became normal (Diabetes. 2006;55[7]:2025-31). “I was sitting at my desk and I thought, ‘This really changes type 2 diabetes,’ ” Dr. Taylor said. “It set in process a series of thoughts as to what was controlling what.”
This inspired ongoing work that Dr. Taylor termed the “twin-cycle hypothesis,” which postulates that chronic calorie excess leads to accumulation of liver fat, which spills over into the pancreas (Diabetologia. 2008;51[10]:1781-9).
“People with type 2 diabetes have been in positive calorie balance for a number of years,” he said. “That’s going to lead to an excess of fat in the body, and liver fat levels tend to rise with increasing body weight. If a person has normal insulin sensitivity in muscle tissue, then dealing with a meal is quite easy. Some 30 years ago, we showed using MR spectroscopy that you will have stored the carbohydrate from your breakfast in muscle, to the extent of about one-third of your breakfast, and the peak will be about 5 hours after breakfast. If you had your corn flakes at seven in the morning, by noon there will be peak in muscle, nicely stored away. However, if you happen to be insulin resistant in muscle, that doesn’t happen. There’s only one other pathway that the body can use, and that’s lipogenesis. The body can turn this very toxic substance [glucose] into safe storage [fat]. A lot of that happens in the liver. This means that people with insulin resistance tend to build up liver fat more rapidly than others.”
To test the twin-cycle hypothesis, Dr. Taylor and colleagues launched an 8-week study known as Counterpoint, which set out to induce negative calorie balance using a very low–calorie diet – about one-quarter of an average person’s daily food intake – in 11 people with diabetes (Diabetologia. 2011;54[10]:2506-14). The diet included consuming three packets of liquid formula food each day (46.4% carbohydrate, 32.5% protein, and 20.1% fat; plus vitamins, minerals, and trace elements), supplemented with portions of nonstarchy vegetables such that total energy intake was about 700 calories a day.
“On a liquid-formula diet, hunger is not a problem after the first 36 hours,” Dr. Taylor said. “This is one of the best-kept secrets of the obesity field. Our low-calorie diet was designed as something that people would be able to do in real life. We included nonstarchy vegetables to keep the bowels happy. That was important. It also fulfilled another point. People didn’t want just a liquid diet. They missed the sensation of chewing.”
The researchers also developed three-point Dixon MRI to measure pancreas and liver triacylglycerol content. “The pancreas was particularly challenging, and the full resources of the magnetic resonance physics team were needed to crack the technical problems,” he said.
After just 1 week of restricted energy intake, the fasting plasma glucose level normalized in the diabetic group, going from 9.2 to 5.9 mmol/L (P = .003), while insulin suppression of hepatic glucose output improved from 43% to 74 % (P = .003). By week 8, pancreatic triacylglycerol decreased from 8.0% to 1.1% (P = .03), and hepatic triacylglycerol content fell from 12.8% to 2.9% (P = .003).
“Within 7 days, there was a 30% drop in liver fat, and hepatic insulin resistance had disappeared,” Dr. Taylor said. “This is not a significant change – it’s a disappearance. For one individual, the amount of fat in the liver decreased from 36% to 2%. In fact, 2% [fat in the liver] was the average in the whole group. But what was simply amazing was the change in first-phase insulin response. It gradually increased throughout the 8 weeks of the study to become similar to the normal control group. We knew right away that a low-calorie diet would start correcting this central abnormality of type 2 diabetes.”
After the results from Counterpoint were published, Dr. Taylor received a “tsunami” of emails from researchers and from members of the public. “Some of the medical experts said it was a flash in the pan – interesting, but not relevant,” he said. “People with diabetes learned of it by the media, and it was talked about as a crash diet, which is unfortunate. First, it wasn’t a crash diet. This diet has to be very carefully planned, and people need to think about it in advance. They need to talk about it with their nearest and dearest, because it’s the spouse, the partner, the friends who will be supporting the individual through this journey. That’s critically important. People don’t eat as isolated individuals, they often eat as a family. We’re not talking about cure. We’re talking about reversal of the processes underpinning diabetes, with the aim of achieving remission.”
Dr. Taylor created a website devoted to providing information for clinicians and patients about the low-calorie diet and other tips on how to reverse type 2 diabetes. Soon afterward, he started to receive emails from people telling him about their experiences with the diet. “In the comfort of their own kitchens these people had lost the same amount of weight as in our trial subjects – about 33 pounds,” Dr. Taylor said. “Most of them had gotten rid of their type 2 diabetes. This was not something artificial as part of a research project. This was something that real people would do if the motivation was strong enough.”
To find out if the results from the Counterpoint study were sustainable, Dr. Taylor and his associates launched the Counterbalance study in 30 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a positive calorie imbalance and whom the researchers followed for 6 months. The 8-week diet consisted of consuming three packets of liquid formula a day comprising 43.0% carbohydrates, 34.0% protein, and 19.5% fat, as well as up to 240 g of nonstarchy vegetables (Diabetes Care. 2016;39[5]:808-15). “This was followed for a 6-month period of normal eating: Eating whatever foods they liked but in quantities to keep their weight steady,” Dr. Taylor explained. “These people gained no weight over the 6-month follow-up period. They achieved normalization of liver fat, and it remained normal.”
The patients’ hemoglobin A1c levels fell from an average of 7.1% at baseline to less than 6.0%, and stayed at less than 6.0%. Patients who didn’t respond tended to have a longer duration of diabetes. Their beta cells had fallen to a level beyond that capable of recovery. “So the durability of the return to normal metabolic function was not in question, at least up to 6 months,” he said. “This study also gave us the opportunity to look at changes in pancreas fat. Was it likely that the liver fat was driving the pancreas fat? Yes.”
During the weight-loss period, the researchers found that there was the same degree of reduction of pancreas fat in the Counterbalance study as there’d been in the Counterpoint study. “Remarkably, it decreased slightly during the 6 months of follow-up,” Dr. Taylor said. “Those changes were significant. Type 2 diabetes seems to be caused by about a half a gram of fat within the cells of the pancreas.”
To investigate if a very low–calorie diet could be used as a routine treatment for type 2 diabetes, Dr. Taylor collaborated with his colleague, Mike Lean, MD, in launching the randomized controlled Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (DiRECT) at 49 primary care practices in the United Kingdom (Diabetologia. 2018;61[3]:589-98). In all, 298 patients were randomized to either best-practice diabetes care alone (control arm) or with an additional evidence-based weight-management program (intervention arm). Remission was defined as having a hemoglobin A1c level of less than 6.5% for at least 2 months without receiving glucose-lowering therapy.
At 1 year, 46% of patients in the intervention arm achieved remission, compared with 4% in the control arm (Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7[5]:344-55). At 2 years, 36% of patients in the intervention arm achieved remission, compared with 2% in the control arm. “The most common comment from study participants was, ‘I feel 10 years younger,’ ” Dr. Taylor said. “That’s important.”
The percentage of patients who achieved remission was 5% in those who lost less than 11 lb (5 kg), 29% in those who lost between 11 lb and 22 lb (5-10 kg), 60% in those who lost between 22 lb and 33 lb (10-15 kg), and 70% in those who lost 33 lb (15 kg) or more.
The researchers found that 62 patients achieved no remission at 12 or 24 months, 15 achieved remission at 12 but not at 24 months, and 48 achieved remission at 12 and 24 months. “We haven’t got this perfectly right yet,” Dr. Taylor said. “There is more work to do in understanding how to achieve prevention of weight gain, maybe with behavioral interventions and/or other agents such as [glucagonlike peptide–1] agonists. This is the start of a story, not the end of it.”
He and his associates also observed that delivery of fat from the liver to the rest of the body was increased in study participants who relapsed. “What effect did that have on the pancreas fat? The people who continued to be free of diabetes showed a slight fall in pancreatic fat between 5 and 24 months,” Dr. Taylor said. “In sharp contrast, the relapsers had a complete increase. Over the whole period of the study, the relapsers had not changed from baseline. It appears beyond reasonable doubt that excess pancreas fat seems to be driving the beta-cell problem underlying type 2 diabetes.”
Dr. Taylor reported that he has received lecture fees from Novartis, Lilly, and Janssen. He has also been an advisory board member for Wilmington Healthcare.
LOS ANGELES – More than 20 years ago, Roy Taylor, MD, began working to further understand the pathogenesis of hepatic insulin resistance in people with type 2 diabetes. It became clear that the main determinant was the amount of fat in the liver.
“If you reduced the amount of fat, the resistance went down,” Dr. Taylor, professor of medicine and metabolism at Newcastle University (England), said at the annual scientific and clinical congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. “We had a very clear picture of what might be controlling this awful matter of fasting glucose being too high.”
Then, Dr. Taylor read a study from Caterina Guidone, MD, and colleagues in Italy, which found that 1 week after patients with type 2 diabetes underwent gastric bypass surgery, their fasting plasma glucose levels became normal (Diabetes. 2006;55[7]:2025-31). “I was sitting at my desk and I thought, ‘This really changes type 2 diabetes,’ ” Dr. Taylor said. “It set in process a series of thoughts as to what was controlling what.”
This inspired ongoing work that Dr. Taylor termed the “twin-cycle hypothesis,” which postulates that chronic calorie excess leads to accumulation of liver fat, which spills over into the pancreas (Diabetologia. 2008;51[10]:1781-9).
“People with type 2 diabetes have been in positive calorie balance for a number of years,” he said. “That’s going to lead to an excess of fat in the body, and liver fat levels tend to rise with increasing body weight. If a person has normal insulin sensitivity in muscle tissue, then dealing with a meal is quite easy. Some 30 years ago, we showed using MR spectroscopy that you will have stored the carbohydrate from your breakfast in muscle, to the extent of about one-third of your breakfast, and the peak will be about 5 hours after breakfast. If you had your corn flakes at seven in the morning, by noon there will be peak in muscle, nicely stored away. However, if you happen to be insulin resistant in muscle, that doesn’t happen. There’s only one other pathway that the body can use, and that’s lipogenesis. The body can turn this very toxic substance [glucose] into safe storage [fat]. A lot of that happens in the liver. This means that people with insulin resistance tend to build up liver fat more rapidly than others.”
To test the twin-cycle hypothesis, Dr. Taylor and colleagues launched an 8-week study known as Counterpoint, which set out to induce negative calorie balance using a very low–calorie diet – about one-quarter of an average person’s daily food intake – in 11 people with diabetes (Diabetologia. 2011;54[10]:2506-14). The diet included consuming three packets of liquid formula food each day (46.4% carbohydrate, 32.5% protein, and 20.1% fat; plus vitamins, minerals, and trace elements), supplemented with portions of nonstarchy vegetables such that total energy intake was about 700 calories a day.
“On a liquid-formula diet, hunger is not a problem after the first 36 hours,” Dr. Taylor said. “This is one of the best-kept secrets of the obesity field. Our low-calorie diet was designed as something that people would be able to do in real life. We included nonstarchy vegetables to keep the bowels happy. That was important. It also fulfilled another point. People didn’t want just a liquid diet. They missed the sensation of chewing.”
The researchers also developed three-point Dixon MRI to measure pancreas and liver triacylglycerol content. “The pancreas was particularly challenging, and the full resources of the magnetic resonance physics team were needed to crack the technical problems,” he said.
After just 1 week of restricted energy intake, the fasting plasma glucose level normalized in the diabetic group, going from 9.2 to 5.9 mmol/L (P = .003), while insulin suppression of hepatic glucose output improved from 43% to 74 % (P = .003). By week 8, pancreatic triacylglycerol decreased from 8.0% to 1.1% (P = .03), and hepatic triacylglycerol content fell from 12.8% to 2.9% (P = .003).
“Within 7 days, there was a 30% drop in liver fat, and hepatic insulin resistance had disappeared,” Dr. Taylor said. “This is not a significant change – it’s a disappearance. For one individual, the amount of fat in the liver decreased from 36% to 2%. In fact, 2% [fat in the liver] was the average in the whole group. But what was simply amazing was the change in first-phase insulin response. It gradually increased throughout the 8 weeks of the study to become similar to the normal control group. We knew right away that a low-calorie diet would start correcting this central abnormality of type 2 diabetes.”
After the results from Counterpoint were published, Dr. Taylor received a “tsunami” of emails from researchers and from members of the public. “Some of the medical experts said it was a flash in the pan – interesting, but not relevant,” he said. “People with diabetes learned of it by the media, and it was talked about as a crash diet, which is unfortunate. First, it wasn’t a crash diet. This diet has to be very carefully planned, and people need to think about it in advance. They need to talk about it with their nearest and dearest, because it’s the spouse, the partner, the friends who will be supporting the individual through this journey. That’s critically important. People don’t eat as isolated individuals, they often eat as a family. We’re not talking about cure. We’re talking about reversal of the processes underpinning diabetes, with the aim of achieving remission.”
Dr. Taylor created a website devoted to providing information for clinicians and patients about the low-calorie diet and other tips on how to reverse type 2 diabetes. Soon afterward, he started to receive emails from people telling him about their experiences with the diet. “In the comfort of their own kitchens these people had lost the same amount of weight as in our trial subjects – about 33 pounds,” Dr. Taylor said. “Most of them had gotten rid of their type 2 diabetes. This was not something artificial as part of a research project. This was something that real people would do if the motivation was strong enough.”
To find out if the results from the Counterpoint study were sustainable, Dr. Taylor and his associates launched the Counterbalance study in 30 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a positive calorie imbalance and whom the researchers followed for 6 months. The 8-week diet consisted of consuming three packets of liquid formula a day comprising 43.0% carbohydrates, 34.0% protein, and 19.5% fat, as well as up to 240 g of nonstarchy vegetables (Diabetes Care. 2016;39[5]:808-15). “This was followed for a 6-month period of normal eating: Eating whatever foods they liked but in quantities to keep their weight steady,” Dr. Taylor explained. “These people gained no weight over the 6-month follow-up period. They achieved normalization of liver fat, and it remained normal.”
The patients’ hemoglobin A1c levels fell from an average of 7.1% at baseline to less than 6.0%, and stayed at less than 6.0%. Patients who didn’t respond tended to have a longer duration of diabetes. Their beta cells had fallen to a level beyond that capable of recovery. “So the durability of the return to normal metabolic function was not in question, at least up to 6 months,” he said. “This study also gave us the opportunity to look at changes in pancreas fat. Was it likely that the liver fat was driving the pancreas fat? Yes.”
During the weight-loss period, the researchers found that there was the same degree of reduction of pancreas fat in the Counterbalance study as there’d been in the Counterpoint study. “Remarkably, it decreased slightly during the 6 months of follow-up,” Dr. Taylor said. “Those changes were significant. Type 2 diabetes seems to be caused by about a half a gram of fat within the cells of the pancreas.”
To investigate if a very low–calorie diet could be used as a routine treatment for type 2 diabetes, Dr. Taylor collaborated with his colleague, Mike Lean, MD, in launching the randomized controlled Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (DiRECT) at 49 primary care practices in the United Kingdom (Diabetologia. 2018;61[3]:589-98). In all, 298 patients were randomized to either best-practice diabetes care alone (control arm) or with an additional evidence-based weight-management program (intervention arm). Remission was defined as having a hemoglobin A1c level of less than 6.5% for at least 2 months without receiving glucose-lowering therapy.
At 1 year, 46% of patients in the intervention arm achieved remission, compared with 4% in the control arm (Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7[5]:344-55). At 2 years, 36% of patients in the intervention arm achieved remission, compared with 2% in the control arm. “The most common comment from study participants was, ‘I feel 10 years younger,’ ” Dr. Taylor said. “That’s important.”
The percentage of patients who achieved remission was 5% in those who lost less than 11 lb (5 kg), 29% in those who lost between 11 lb and 22 lb (5-10 kg), 60% in those who lost between 22 lb and 33 lb (10-15 kg), and 70% in those who lost 33 lb (15 kg) or more.
The researchers found that 62 patients achieved no remission at 12 or 24 months, 15 achieved remission at 12 but not at 24 months, and 48 achieved remission at 12 and 24 months. “We haven’t got this perfectly right yet,” Dr. Taylor said. “There is more work to do in understanding how to achieve prevention of weight gain, maybe with behavioral interventions and/or other agents such as [glucagonlike peptide–1] agonists. This is the start of a story, not the end of it.”
He and his associates also observed that delivery of fat from the liver to the rest of the body was increased in study participants who relapsed. “What effect did that have on the pancreas fat? The people who continued to be free of diabetes showed a slight fall in pancreatic fat between 5 and 24 months,” Dr. Taylor said. “In sharp contrast, the relapsers had a complete increase. Over the whole period of the study, the relapsers had not changed from baseline. It appears beyond reasonable doubt that excess pancreas fat seems to be driving the beta-cell problem underlying type 2 diabetes.”
Dr. Taylor reported that he has received lecture fees from Novartis, Lilly, and Janssen. He has also been an advisory board member for Wilmington Healthcare.
LOS ANGELES – More than 20 years ago, Roy Taylor, MD, began working to further understand the pathogenesis of hepatic insulin resistance in people with type 2 diabetes. It became clear that the main determinant was the amount of fat in the liver.
“If you reduced the amount of fat, the resistance went down,” Dr. Taylor, professor of medicine and metabolism at Newcastle University (England), said at the annual scientific and clinical congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. “We had a very clear picture of what might be controlling this awful matter of fasting glucose being too high.”
Then, Dr. Taylor read a study from Caterina Guidone, MD, and colleagues in Italy, which found that 1 week after patients with type 2 diabetes underwent gastric bypass surgery, their fasting plasma glucose levels became normal (Diabetes. 2006;55[7]:2025-31). “I was sitting at my desk and I thought, ‘This really changes type 2 diabetes,’ ” Dr. Taylor said. “It set in process a series of thoughts as to what was controlling what.”
This inspired ongoing work that Dr. Taylor termed the “twin-cycle hypothesis,” which postulates that chronic calorie excess leads to accumulation of liver fat, which spills over into the pancreas (Diabetologia. 2008;51[10]:1781-9).
“People with type 2 diabetes have been in positive calorie balance for a number of years,” he said. “That’s going to lead to an excess of fat in the body, and liver fat levels tend to rise with increasing body weight. If a person has normal insulin sensitivity in muscle tissue, then dealing with a meal is quite easy. Some 30 years ago, we showed using MR spectroscopy that you will have stored the carbohydrate from your breakfast in muscle, to the extent of about one-third of your breakfast, and the peak will be about 5 hours after breakfast. If you had your corn flakes at seven in the morning, by noon there will be peak in muscle, nicely stored away. However, if you happen to be insulin resistant in muscle, that doesn’t happen. There’s only one other pathway that the body can use, and that’s lipogenesis. The body can turn this very toxic substance [glucose] into safe storage [fat]. A lot of that happens in the liver. This means that people with insulin resistance tend to build up liver fat more rapidly than others.”
To test the twin-cycle hypothesis, Dr. Taylor and colleagues launched an 8-week study known as Counterpoint, which set out to induce negative calorie balance using a very low–calorie diet – about one-quarter of an average person’s daily food intake – in 11 people with diabetes (Diabetologia. 2011;54[10]:2506-14). The diet included consuming three packets of liquid formula food each day (46.4% carbohydrate, 32.5% protein, and 20.1% fat; plus vitamins, minerals, and trace elements), supplemented with portions of nonstarchy vegetables such that total energy intake was about 700 calories a day.
“On a liquid-formula diet, hunger is not a problem after the first 36 hours,” Dr. Taylor said. “This is one of the best-kept secrets of the obesity field. Our low-calorie diet was designed as something that people would be able to do in real life. We included nonstarchy vegetables to keep the bowels happy. That was important. It also fulfilled another point. People didn’t want just a liquid diet. They missed the sensation of chewing.”
The researchers also developed three-point Dixon MRI to measure pancreas and liver triacylglycerol content. “The pancreas was particularly challenging, and the full resources of the magnetic resonance physics team were needed to crack the technical problems,” he said.
After just 1 week of restricted energy intake, the fasting plasma glucose level normalized in the diabetic group, going from 9.2 to 5.9 mmol/L (P = .003), while insulin suppression of hepatic glucose output improved from 43% to 74 % (P = .003). By week 8, pancreatic triacylglycerol decreased from 8.0% to 1.1% (P = .03), and hepatic triacylglycerol content fell from 12.8% to 2.9% (P = .003).
“Within 7 days, there was a 30% drop in liver fat, and hepatic insulin resistance had disappeared,” Dr. Taylor said. “This is not a significant change – it’s a disappearance. For one individual, the amount of fat in the liver decreased from 36% to 2%. In fact, 2% [fat in the liver] was the average in the whole group. But what was simply amazing was the change in first-phase insulin response. It gradually increased throughout the 8 weeks of the study to become similar to the normal control group. We knew right away that a low-calorie diet would start correcting this central abnormality of type 2 diabetes.”
After the results from Counterpoint were published, Dr. Taylor received a “tsunami” of emails from researchers and from members of the public. “Some of the medical experts said it was a flash in the pan – interesting, but not relevant,” he said. “People with diabetes learned of it by the media, and it was talked about as a crash diet, which is unfortunate. First, it wasn’t a crash diet. This diet has to be very carefully planned, and people need to think about it in advance. They need to talk about it with their nearest and dearest, because it’s the spouse, the partner, the friends who will be supporting the individual through this journey. That’s critically important. People don’t eat as isolated individuals, they often eat as a family. We’re not talking about cure. We’re talking about reversal of the processes underpinning diabetes, with the aim of achieving remission.”
Dr. Taylor created a website devoted to providing information for clinicians and patients about the low-calorie diet and other tips on how to reverse type 2 diabetes. Soon afterward, he started to receive emails from people telling him about their experiences with the diet. “In the comfort of their own kitchens these people had lost the same amount of weight as in our trial subjects – about 33 pounds,” Dr. Taylor said. “Most of them had gotten rid of their type 2 diabetes. This was not something artificial as part of a research project. This was something that real people would do if the motivation was strong enough.”
To find out if the results from the Counterpoint study were sustainable, Dr. Taylor and his associates launched the Counterbalance study in 30 patients with type 2 diabetes who had a positive calorie imbalance and whom the researchers followed for 6 months. The 8-week diet consisted of consuming three packets of liquid formula a day comprising 43.0% carbohydrates, 34.0% protein, and 19.5% fat, as well as up to 240 g of nonstarchy vegetables (Diabetes Care. 2016;39[5]:808-15). “This was followed for a 6-month period of normal eating: Eating whatever foods they liked but in quantities to keep their weight steady,” Dr. Taylor explained. “These people gained no weight over the 6-month follow-up period. They achieved normalization of liver fat, and it remained normal.”
The patients’ hemoglobin A1c levels fell from an average of 7.1% at baseline to less than 6.0%, and stayed at less than 6.0%. Patients who didn’t respond tended to have a longer duration of diabetes. Their beta cells had fallen to a level beyond that capable of recovery. “So the durability of the return to normal metabolic function was not in question, at least up to 6 months,” he said. “This study also gave us the opportunity to look at changes in pancreas fat. Was it likely that the liver fat was driving the pancreas fat? Yes.”
During the weight-loss period, the researchers found that there was the same degree of reduction of pancreas fat in the Counterbalance study as there’d been in the Counterpoint study. “Remarkably, it decreased slightly during the 6 months of follow-up,” Dr. Taylor said. “Those changes were significant. Type 2 diabetes seems to be caused by about a half a gram of fat within the cells of the pancreas.”
To investigate if a very low–calorie diet could be used as a routine treatment for type 2 diabetes, Dr. Taylor collaborated with his colleague, Mike Lean, MD, in launching the randomized controlled Diabetes Remission Clinical Trial (DiRECT) at 49 primary care practices in the United Kingdom (Diabetologia. 2018;61[3]:589-98). In all, 298 patients were randomized to either best-practice diabetes care alone (control arm) or with an additional evidence-based weight-management program (intervention arm). Remission was defined as having a hemoglobin A1c level of less than 6.5% for at least 2 months without receiving glucose-lowering therapy.
At 1 year, 46% of patients in the intervention arm achieved remission, compared with 4% in the control arm (Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7[5]:344-55). At 2 years, 36% of patients in the intervention arm achieved remission, compared with 2% in the control arm. “The most common comment from study participants was, ‘I feel 10 years younger,’ ” Dr. Taylor said. “That’s important.”
The percentage of patients who achieved remission was 5% in those who lost less than 11 lb (5 kg), 29% in those who lost between 11 lb and 22 lb (5-10 kg), 60% in those who lost between 22 lb and 33 lb (10-15 kg), and 70% in those who lost 33 lb (15 kg) or more.
The researchers found that 62 patients achieved no remission at 12 or 24 months, 15 achieved remission at 12 but not at 24 months, and 48 achieved remission at 12 and 24 months. “We haven’t got this perfectly right yet,” Dr. Taylor said. “There is more work to do in understanding how to achieve prevention of weight gain, maybe with behavioral interventions and/or other agents such as [glucagonlike peptide–1] agonists. This is the start of a story, not the end of it.”
He and his associates also observed that delivery of fat from the liver to the rest of the body was increased in study participants who relapsed. “What effect did that have on the pancreas fat? The people who continued to be free of diabetes showed a slight fall in pancreatic fat between 5 and 24 months,” Dr. Taylor said. “In sharp contrast, the relapsers had a complete increase. Over the whole period of the study, the relapsers had not changed from baseline. It appears beyond reasonable doubt that excess pancreas fat seems to be driving the beta-cell problem underlying type 2 diabetes.”
Dr. Taylor reported that he has received lecture fees from Novartis, Lilly, and Janssen. He has also been an advisory board member for Wilmington Healthcare.
EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM AACE 2109
