Bendamustine-rituximab effective in elderly with indolent non-Hodgkin's or mantle cell lymphoma

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: In the real-world setting, dose reductions and therapy delays are more common among elderly vs younger patients receiving first-line bendamustine-rituximab (BR) for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, the efficacy and safety of BR is unaffected across age groups.

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 42 months, the elderly vs younger patient group had a significantly lower proportion of patients receiving full doses of bendamustine (54% vs 79.5%; P < .001) and higher treatment delay rate (54% vs 43.2%; P < .001) but similar disease-free survival (P = .069). The number of all-grade adverse events per patient was similar between the groups across each BR cycle.

Study details: This retrospective observational cohort study included 201 patients (elderly [≥70 years] n = 113 or younger [18-70 years] n = 88) with iNHL or MCL who received BR therapy.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kotchetkov R et al. Bendamustine and rituximab is well-tolerated and efficient in the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma in elderly: A single center observational study. Int J Cancer. 2022 (Dec 22). Doi: 10.1002/ijc.34412

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: In the real-world setting, dose reductions and therapy delays are more common among elderly vs younger patients receiving first-line bendamustine-rituximab (BR) for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, the efficacy and safety of BR is unaffected across age groups.

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 42 months, the elderly vs younger patient group had a significantly lower proportion of patients receiving full doses of bendamustine (54% vs 79.5%; P < .001) and higher treatment delay rate (54% vs 43.2%; P < .001) but similar disease-free survival (P = .069). The number of all-grade adverse events per patient was similar between the groups across each BR cycle.

Study details: This retrospective observational cohort study included 201 patients (elderly [≥70 years] n = 113 or younger [18-70 years] n = 88) with iNHL or MCL who received BR therapy.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kotchetkov R et al. Bendamustine and rituximab is well-tolerated and efficient in the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma in elderly: A single center observational study. Int J Cancer. 2022 (Dec 22). Doi: 10.1002/ijc.34412

Key clinical point: In the real-world setting, dose reductions and therapy delays are more common among elderly vs younger patients receiving first-line bendamustine-rituximab (BR) for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, the efficacy and safety of BR is unaffected across age groups.

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 42 months, the elderly vs younger patient group had a significantly lower proportion of patients receiving full doses of bendamustine (54% vs 79.5%; P < .001) and higher treatment delay rate (54% vs 43.2%; P < .001) but similar disease-free survival (P = .069). The number of all-grade adverse events per patient was similar between the groups across each BR cycle.

Study details: This retrospective observational cohort study included 201 patients (elderly [≥70 years] n = 113 or younger [18-70 years] n = 88) with iNHL or MCL who received BR therapy.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kotchetkov R et al. Bendamustine and rituximab is well-tolerated and efficient in the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma in elderly: A single center observational study. Int J Cancer. 2022 (Dec 22). Doi: 10.1002/ijc.34412

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: B-Cell Lymphoma, March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Glofitamab induces a durable complete response in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Fixed-duration glofitamab treatment led to durable complete responses and a grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) rate of >50% in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 12.6 months, 39% (95% CI 32%-48%) and 52% (95% CI 43%-60%) of patients achieved complete and objective responses, respectively. The median time to a complete response was 42 (95% CI 42-44) days; 78% of patients with a complete response continued to be in remission at 12 months. The grade ≥3 AE rate was 62%.

Study details: This phase 2 part of a phase 1-2 study included 155 adult patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL previously treated with ≥2 lines of therapy who received obinutuzumab pretreatment followed by fixed-duration glofitamab monotherapy for 12 cycles.

Disclosures: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Two authors declared being employees of and holding stock or stock options in F. Hoffmann-La Roche.

Source: Dickinson MJ et al. Glofitamab for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2220-2231 (Dec 11). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206913

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Fixed-duration glofitamab treatment led to durable complete responses and a grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) rate of >50% in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 12.6 months, 39% (95% CI 32%-48%) and 52% (95% CI 43%-60%) of patients achieved complete and objective responses, respectively. The median time to a complete response was 42 (95% CI 42-44) days; 78% of patients with a complete response continued to be in remission at 12 months. The grade ≥3 AE rate was 62%.

Study details: This phase 2 part of a phase 1-2 study included 155 adult patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL previously treated with ≥2 lines of therapy who received obinutuzumab pretreatment followed by fixed-duration glofitamab monotherapy for 12 cycles.

Disclosures: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Two authors declared being employees of and holding stock or stock options in F. Hoffmann-La Roche.

Source: Dickinson MJ et al. Glofitamab for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2220-2231 (Dec 11). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206913

Key clinical point: Fixed-duration glofitamab treatment led to durable complete responses and a grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) rate of >50% in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 12.6 months, 39% (95% CI 32%-48%) and 52% (95% CI 43%-60%) of patients achieved complete and objective responses, respectively. The median time to a complete response was 42 (95% CI 42-44) days; 78% of patients with a complete response continued to be in remission at 12 months. The grade ≥3 AE rate was 62%.

Study details: This phase 2 part of a phase 1-2 study included 155 adult patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL previously treated with ≥2 lines of therapy who received obinutuzumab pretreatment followed by fixed-duration glofitamab monotherapy for 12 cycles.

Disclosures: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Two authors declared being employees of and holding stock or stock options in F. Hoffmann-La Roche.

Source: Dickinson MJ et al. Glofitamab for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2220-2231 (Dec 11). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206913

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: B-Cell Lymphoma, March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Zanubrutinib tops ibrutinib in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Compared with ibrutinib, zanubrutinib prolonged progression-free survival and demonstrated an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, the zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib group had a 35% decreased risk for progression or death (hazard ratio 0.65; P = .002) and a lower incidence of cardiac disorders (21.3% vs 29.6%) and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15.4% vs 22.2%).

Study details: Findings are from the multicenter phase 3 ALPINE trial including 652 adult patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL treated with ≥1 previous line of therapy who were randomly assigned to receive zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325).

Disclosures: This study was funded by BeiGene. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including BeiGene. Six authors declared being employees of or holding stock or stock options in BeiGene.

Source: Brown JR et al. Zanubrutinib or ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2022;388(4):319-332 (Dec 13). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2211582

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Compared with ibrutinib, zanubrutinib prolonged progression-free survival and demonstrated an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, the zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib group had a 35% decreased risk for progression or death (hazard ratio 0.65; P = .002) and a lower incidence of cardiac disorders (21.3% vs 29.6%) and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15.4% vs 22.2%).

Study details: Findings are from the multicenter phase 3 ALPINE trial including 652 adult patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL treated with ≥1 previous line of therapy who were randomly assigned to receive zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325).

Disclosures: This study was funded by BeiGene. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including BeiGene. Six authors declared being employees of or holding stock or stock options in BeiGene.

Source: Brown JR et al. Zanubrutinib or ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2022;388(4):319-332 (Dec 13). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2211582

Key clinical point: Compared with ibrutinib, zanubrutinib prolonged progression-free survival and demonstrated an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

 

Major finding: At a median follow-up of 29.6 months, the zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib group had a 35% decreased risk for progression or death (hazard ratio 0.65; P = .002) and a lower incidence of cardiac disorders (21.3% vs 29.6%) and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (15.4% vs 22.2%).

Study details: Findings are from the multicenter phase 3 ALPINE trial including 652 adult patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL treated with ≥1 previous line of therapy who were randomly assigned to receive zanubrutinib (n = 327) or ibrutinib (n = 325).

Disclosures: This study was funded by BeiGene. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including BeiGene. Six authors declared being employees of or holding stock or stock options in BeiGene.

Source: Brown JR et al. Zanubrutinib or ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2022;388(4):319-332 (Dec 13). Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2211582

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: B-Cell Lymphoma, March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Mantle cell lymphoma: Long-term data support high-dose cytarabine-containing regimens

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Rituximab+cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) compared with standard myeloablative radiochemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; R-CHOP arm), an alternating R-CHOP/rituximab+dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine-containing myeloablative radiochemotherapy and ASCT (R-DHAP arm) led to longer time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

 

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 10.6 years, the R-DHAP vs R-CHOP arm continued to have a significantly longer TTF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; P = .038) and OS (Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index+Ki-67-adjusted HR 0.60; P = .0066).

Study details: This long-term analysis of the phase 3 MCL Younger trial included 497 patients aged ≥18 to <66 years with previously untreated MCL who were randomly assigned to the R-CHOP (n = 249) or R-DHAP (n = 248) arm.

Disclosures: This study was supported by European Commission, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and Roche. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including Roche.

Source: Hermine O et al. High-dose cytarabine and autologous stem-cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: Long-term follow-up of the randomized mantle cell lymphoma younger trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2022;41(3):479-484 (Dec 5). Doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01780

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Rituximab+cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) compared with standard myeloablative radiochemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; R-CHOP arm), an alternating R-CHOP/rituximab+dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine-containing myeloablative radiochemotherapy and ASCT (R-DHAP arm) led to longer time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

 

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 10.6 years, the R-DHAP vs R-CHOP arm continued to have a significantly longer TTF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; P = .038) and OS (Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index+Ki-67-adjusted HR 0.60; P = .0066).

Study details: This long-term analysis of the phase 3 MCL Younger trial included 497 patients aged ≥18 to <66 years with previously untreated MCL who were randomly assigned to the R-CHOP (n = 249) or R-DHAP (n = 248) arm.

Disclosures: This study was supported by European Commission, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and Roche. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including Roche.

Source: Hermine O et al. High-dose cytarabine and autologous stem-cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: Long-term follow-up of the randomized mantle cell lymphoma younger trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2022;41(3):479-484 (Dec 5). Doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01780

Key clinical point: Rituximab+cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) compared with standard myeloablative radiochemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; R-CHOP arm), an alternating R-CHOP/rituximab+dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP) induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine-containing myeloablative radiochemotherapy and ASCT (R-DHAP arm) led to longer time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

 

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 10.6 years, the R-DHAP vs R-CHOP arm continued to have a significantly longer TTF (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; P = .038) and OS (Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index+Ki-67-adjusted HR 0.60; P = .0066).

Study details: This long-term analysis of the phase 3 MCL Younger trial included 497 patients aged ≥18 to <66 years with previously untreated MCL who were randomly assigned to the R-CHOP (n = 249) or R-DHAP (n = 248) arm.

Disclosures: This study was supported by European Commission, Lymphoma Research Foundation, and Roche. Some authors reported ties with various organizations, including Roche.

Source: Hermine O et al. High-dose cytarabine and autologous stem-cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma: Long-term follow-up of the randomized mantle cell lymphoma younger trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2022;41(3):479-484 (Dec 5). Doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01780

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: B-Cell Lymphoma, March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Meta-analysis shows MRI as most effective supplemental BC screening tool

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved to be the best supplemental breast cancer (BC) screening modality in women with dense breasts and who had a negative mammogram who were at an average or intermediate risk for the disease.

Major finding: Among the screened patients with dense breasts and a negative mammogram, 541 cases of BC were detected using supplemental modalities. The incremental cancer detection rate was highest with MRI (1.54 per 1,000 screenings) compared with other supplemental modalities (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 22 randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies including 261,233 patients, of which 120,081 patients had dense breasts and a negative mammogram.

Disclosures: This study did not report the source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hussein H et al. Supplemental breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts and negative mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2023;221785 (Jan 31). Doi: 10.1148/radiol.221785

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved to be the best supplemental breast cancer (BC) screening modality in women with dense breasts and who had a negative mammogram who were at an average or intermediate risk for the disease.

Major finding: Among the screened patients with dense breasts and a negative mammogram, 541 cases of BC were detected using supplemental modalities. The incremental cancer detection rate was highest with MRI (1.54 per 1,000 screenings) compared with other supplemental modalities (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 22 randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies including 261,233 patients, of which 120,081 patients had dense breasts and a negative mammogram.

Disclosures: This study did not report the source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hussein H et al. Supplemental breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts and negative mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2023;221785 (Jan 31). Doi: 10.1148/radiol.221785

Key clinical point: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved to be the best supplemental breast cancer (BC) screening modality in women with dense breasts and who had a negative mammogram who were at an average or intermediate risk for the disease.

Major finding: Among the screened patients with dense breasts and a negative mammogram, 541 cases of BC were detected using supplemental modalities. The incremental cancer detection rate was highest with MRI (1.54 per 1,000 screenings) compared with other supplemental modalities (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 22 randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies including 261,233 patients, of which 120,081 patients had dense breasts and a negative mammogram.

Disclosures: This study did not report the source of funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Hussein H et al. Supplemental breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts and negative mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2023;221785 (Jan 31). Doi: 10.1148/radiol.221785

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

ET duration: A risk factor for cognitive impairment in BC patients

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Duration of endocrine therapy (ET) is an important risk factor for cognitive function impairment in patients with breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: Duration of ET was a significant risk factor for overall cognitive decline (odds ratio 1.296; 95% CI 1.008-1.665), with the prolongation of ET further increasing the risk for cognitive decline (linear-by-linear association test statistic 5.872; P < .05).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, interventional single-center study including 127 women with BC, of which 49 patients were classified into the cognitive decline group.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Yin Y et al. Association between endocrine therapy and cognitive decline in breast cancer based on propensity score matching. Front Med. 2023;10:1132287 (Jan 26). Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1132287

 

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Duration of endocrine therapy (ET) is an important risk factor for cognitive function impairment in patients with breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: Duration of ET was a significant risk factor for overall cognitive decline (odds ratio 1.296; 95% CI 1.008-1.665), with the prolongation of ET further increasing the risk for cognitive decline (linear-by-linear association test statistic 5.872; P < .05).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, interventional single-center study including 127 women with BC, of which 49 patients were classified into the cognitive decline group.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Yin Y et al. Association between endocrine therapy and cognitive decline in breast cancer based on propensity score matching. Front Med. 2023;10:1132287 (Jan 26). Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1132287

 

 

Key clinical point: Duration of endocrine therapy (ET) is an important risk factor for cognitive function impairment in patients with breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: Duration of ET was a significant risk factor for overall cognitive decline (odds ratio 1.296; 95% CI 1.008-1.665), with the prolongation of ET further increasing the risk for cognitive decline (linear-by-linear association test statistic 5.872; P < .05).

Study details: Findings are from a prospective, interventional single-center study including 127 women with BC, of which 49 patients were classified into the cognitive decline group.

Disclosures: This study was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Yin Y et al. Association between endocrine therapy and cognitive decline in breast cancer based on propensity score matching. Front Med. 2023;10:1132287 (Jan 26). Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1132287

 

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Meta-analysis associates HER2-low expression with good prognosis in early BC

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: HER2-low expression vs HER2-zero BC was associated with a significant overall survival benefit in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83; 95% CI 0.78-0.88) and in the subpopulations of patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89) and triple-negative BC (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.87).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 14 studies including 52,106 patients with early BC.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wei T et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic significance of HER2-low expression in patients with early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1100332 (Feb 2). Doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1100332

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: HER2-low expression vs HER2-zero BC was associated with a significant overall survival benefit in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83; 95% CI 0.78-0.88) and in the subpopulations of patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89) and triple-negative BC (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.87).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 14 studies including 52,106 patients with early BC.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wei T et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic significance of HER2-low expression in patients with early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1100332 (Feb 2). Doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1100332

 

Key clinical point: Low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein was associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: HER2-low expression vs HER2-zero BC was associated with a significant overall survival benefit in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83; 95% CI 0.78-0.88) and in the subpopulations of patients with hormone receptor-positive BC (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.89) and triple-negative BC (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.87).

Study details: Findings are from a meta-analysis of 14 studies including 52,106 patients with early BC.

Disclosures: This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and other sources. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Wei T et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic significance of HER2-low expression in patients with early breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1100332 (Feb 2). Doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1100332

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

HER2+/HR+ metastatic BC: Adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab+AI shows PFS benefit

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: According to the PERTAIN trial’s final analysis, the progression-free survival (PFS) benefit associated with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab+aromatase inhibitor (AI) persisted even after >6 years of follow-up in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)/hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of >70 months, a >2-year PFS benefit was observed in the pertuzumab+trastuzumab+AI vs trastuzumab+AI treatment group (20.6 vs 15.8 months; stratified hazard ratio 0.67; P = .006). No new safety signals were identified.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 2 PERTAIN study including 258 postmenopausal patients with previously untreated HER2+/HR+ metastatic or locally advanced BC who were randomly assigned to receive pertuzumab+trastuzumab+AI or trastuzumab+AI.

Disclosures: This study was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Some authors declared serving as advisors or on speaker’s bureau for or receiving research grants, travel, or accommodation expenses from several sources. Four authors declared being employees of or owning stocks in F. Hoffmann-La Roche.

Source: Arpino G et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and an aromatase inhibitor for HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer: PERTAIN final analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 (Jan 30). Doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1092

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: According to the PERTAIN trial’s final analysis, the progression-free survival (PFS) benefit associated with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab+aromatase inhibitor (AI) persisted even after >6 years of follow-up in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)/hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of >70 months, a >2-year PFS benefit was observed in the pertuzumab+trastuzumab+AI vs trastuzumab+AI treatment group (20.6 vs 15.8 months; stratified hazard ratio 0.67; P = .006). No new safety signals were identified.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 2 PERTAIN study including 258 postmenopausal patients with previously untreated HER2+/HR+ metastatic or locally advanced BC who were randomly assigned to receive pertuzumab+trastuzumab+AI or trastuzumab+AI.

Disclosures: This study was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Some authors declared serving as advisors or on speaker’s bureau for or receiving research grants, travel, or accommodation expenses from several sources. Four authors declared being employees of or owning stocks in F. Hoffmann-La Roche.

Source: Arpino G et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and an aromatase inhibitor for HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer: PERTAIN final analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 (Jan 30). Doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1092

Key clinical point: According to the PERTAIN trial’s final analysis, the progression-free survival (PFS) benefit associated with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab+aromatase inhibitor (AI) persisted even after >6 years of follow-up in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)/hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (BC).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of >70 months, a >2-year PFS benefit was observed in the pertuzumab+trastuzumab+AI vs trastuzumab+AI treatment group (20.6 vs 15.8 months; stratified hazard ratio 0.67; P = .006). No new safety signals were identified.

Study details: Findings are from the phase 2 PERTAIN study including 258 postmenopausal patients with previously untreated HER2+/HR+ metastatic or locally advanced BC who were randomly assigned to receive pertuzumab+trastuzumab+AI or trastuzumab+AI.

Disclosures: This study was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Some authors declared serving as advisors or on speaker’s bureau for or receiving research grants, travel, or accommodation expenses from several sources. Four authors declared being employees of or owning stocks in F. Hoffmann-La Roche.

Source: Arpino G et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and an aromatase inhibitor for HER2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer: PERTAIN final analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 (Jan 30). Doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1092

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

Anti-HER2 therapy may be omitted in patients with HER2+ ILC

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Survival outcomes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), a rare and poorly characterized subtype of breast cancer (BC), were similar to those in HER2+ invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or HER2-negative (HER2−) ILC and did not improve with anti-HER2 treatment.

Major finding: Compared with patients with HER2+ ILC, patients with HER2+ IDC and HER2− ILC had similar overall survival (OS; P = .6 and P = .29, respectively) and disease-free survival (DFS; P = .69 and P = .18, respectively) outcomes. Anti-HER2 therapy did not improve OS or DFS in patients with HER2+/HER2−ILC (both P = .2), although it improved survival outcomes in patients with HER2+ IDC (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based study including 833 patients with HER2+ IDC, 62 patients with HER2+ ILC, and 685 patients with HER2− ILC.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kada Mohammed S et al. HER2-positive invasive lobular carcinoma: A rare breast cancer which may not necessarily require anti-HER2 therapy. A population-based study. Breast Cancer. 2023 (Jan 30). Doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01432-3

 

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Survival outcomes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), a rare and poorly characterized subtype of breast cancer (BC), were similar to those in HER2+ invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or HER2-negative (HER2−) ILC and did not improve with anti-HER2 treatment.

Major finding: Compared with patients with HER2+ ILC, patients with HER2+ IDC and HER2− ILC had similar overall survival (OS; P = .6 and P = .29, respectively) and disease-free survival (DFS; P = .69 and P = .18, respectively) outcomes. Anti-HER2 therapy did not improve OS or DFS in patients with HER2+/HER2−ILC (both P = .2), although it improved survival outcomes in patients with HER2+ IDC (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based study including 833 patients with HER2+ IDC, 62 patients with HER2+ ILC, and 685 patients with HER2− ILC.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kada Mohammed S et al. HER2-positive invasive lobular carcinoma: A rare breast cancer which may not necessarily require anti-HER2 therapy. A population-based study. Breast Cancer. 2023 (Jan 30). Doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01432-3

 

Key clinical point: Survival outcomes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), a rare and poorly characterized subtype of breast cancer (BC), were similar to those in HER2+ invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or HER2-negative (HER2−) ILC and did not improve with anti-HER2 treatment.

Major finding: Compared with patients with HER2+ ILC, patients with HER2+ IDC and HER2− ILC had similar overall survival (OS; P = .6 and P = .29, respectively) and disease-free survival (DFS; P = .69 and P = .18, respectively) outcomes. Anti-HER2 therapy did not improve OS or DFS in patients with HER2+/HER2−ILC (both P = .2), although it improved survival outcomes in patients with HER2+ IDC (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a population-based study including 833 patients with HER2+ IDC, 62 patients with HER2+ ILC, and 685 patients with HER2− ILC.

Disclosures: This study did not receive any funding. The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Source: Kada Mohammed S et al. HER2-positive invasive lobular carcinoma: A rare breast cancer which may not necessarily require anti-HER2 therapy. A population-based study. Breast Cancer. 2023 (Jan 30). Doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01432-3

 

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article

HER2+ metastatic BC brain metastases: Superior survival outcomes with trastuzumab emtansine vs lapatinib+capecitabine

Article Type
Changed

Key clinical point: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) led to superior survival outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine (LC) in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 30.7 months, overall survival was significantly improved with T-DM1 vs LC (hazard ratio 0.55; P = .013), with significant improvements observed in other endpoints, such as time to next relevant treatment or death (P = .005) and real-world progression-free survival (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a real-world study including 214 patients with HER2+ BCBM who initiated treatment with T-DM1 (n = 161) or LC (n = 53).

Disclosures: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Three authors declared being employees of and owning stocks in Roche. The other authors declared receiving honoraria, consulting, or advisory fees from, being employees of, or owning stocks in other sources.

Source: Sanglier T et al. Trastuzumab emtansine vs lapatinib and capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer brain metastases: A real-world study. Breast. 2023 (Jan 15). Doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.007

Publications
Topics
Sections

Key clinical point: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) led to superior survival outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine (LC) in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 30.7 months, overall survival was significantly improved with T-DM1 vs LC (hazard ratio 0.55; P = .013), with significant improvements observed in other endpoints, such as time to next relevant treatment or death (P = .005) and real-world progression-free survival (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a real-world study including 214 patients with HER2+ BCBM who initiated treatment with T-DM1 (n = 161) or LC (n = 53).

Disclosures: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Three authors declared being employees of and owning stocks in Roche. The other authors declared receiving honoraria, consulting, or advisory fees from, being employees of, or owning stocks in other sources.

Source: Sanglier T et al. Trastuzumab emtansine vs lapatinib and capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer brain metastases: A real-world study. Breast. 2023 (Jan 15). Doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.007

Key clinical point: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) led to superior survival outcomes compared with lapatinib plus capecitabine (LC) in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

Major finding: After a median follow-up of 30.7 months, overall survival was significantly improved with T-DM1 vs LC (hazard ratio 0.55; P = .013), with significant improvements observed in other endpoints, such as time to next relevant treatment or death (P = .005) and real-world progression-free survival (P < .001).

Study details: Findings are from a real-world study including 214 patients with HER2+ BCBM who initiated treatment with T-DM1 (n = 161) or LC (n = 53).

Disclosures: This study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Three authors declared being employees of and owning stocks in Roche. The other authors declared receiving honoraria, consulting, or advisory fees from, being employees of, or owning stocks in other sources.

Source: Sanglier T et al. Trastuzumab emtansine vs lapatinib and capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer brain metastases: A real-world study. Breast. 2023 (Jan 15). Doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.007

Publications
Publications
Topics
Article Type
Sections
Disallow All Ads
Content Gating
No Gating (article Unlocked/Free)
Alternative CME
Disqus Comments
Default
Article Series
Clinical Edge Journal Scan: Breast Cancer March 2023
Gate On Date
Un-Gate On Date
Use ProPublica
CFC Schedule Remove Status
Hide sidebar & use full width
render the right sidebar.
Conference Recap Checkbox
Not Conference Recap
Clinical Edge
Display the Slideshow in this Article
Medscape Article
Display survey writer
Reuters content
Disable Inline Native ads
WebMD Article