User login
FDA: Olanzapine can cause serious skin reaction
Olanzapine can cause a rare but serious skin reaction that can affect other parts of the body, according to a Food and Drug Administration safety alert released May 10.
The condition linked to all products containing the second-generation antipsychotic is called Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms, or DRESS. Symptoms of DRESS include a rash that can spread to all parts of the body, fever, swollen lymph nodes, and swelling. In addition, DRESS can result in injury to the liver, kidneys, lungs, heart, or pancreas, and it also can lead to death. The mortality tied to DRESS can reach 10%, the FDA said.
The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database has identified 23 cases worldwide of DRESS resulting from olanzapine since 1996, including one patient who died. Currently, the only way to treat DRESS is to withdraw the drug promptly. “Health care professionals should immediately stop treatment with olanzapine if DRESS is suspected,” the safety alert states. “The important ways to manage DRESS are early recognition of the syndrome, discontinuation of the offending agent as soon as possible, and supportive care.”
Olanzapine, used to treat schizophrenia and manic episodes of bipolar disorder, is available in generic versions. The medication also is available under the brand names Zyprexa, Zyprexa Zydis, Zyprexa Relprevv, and Symbyax. The agency said it would add a warning describing DRESS to the labels of drugs containing olanzapine.
Read the full safety alert on the FDA website.
Olanzapine can cause a rare but serious skin reaction that can affect other parts of the body, according to a Food and Drug Administration safety alert released May 10.
The condition linked to all products containing the second-generation antipsychotic is called Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms, or DRESS. Symptoms of DRESS include a rash that can spread to all parts of the body, fever, swollen lymph nodes, and swelling. In addition, DRESS can result in injury to the liver, kidneys, lungs, heart, or pancreas, and it also can lead to death. The mortality tied to DRESS can reach 10%, the FDA said.
The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database has identified 23 cases worldwide of DRESS resulting from olanzapine since 1996, including one patient who died. Currently, the only way to treat DRESS is to withdraw the drug promptly. “Health care professionals should immediately stop treatment with olanzapine if DRESS is suspected,” the safety alert states. “The important ways to manage DRESS are early recognition of the syndrome, discontinuation of the offending agent as soon as possible, and supportive care.”
Olanzapine, used to treat schizophrenia and manic episodes of bipolar disorder, is available in generic versions. The medication also is available under the brand names Zyprexa, Zyprexa Zydis, Zyprexa Relprevv, and Symbyax. The agency said it would add a warning describing DRESS to the labels of drugs containing olanzapine.
Read the full safety alert on the FDA website.
Olanzapine can cause a rare but serious skin reaction that can affect other parts of the body, according to a Food and Drug Administration safety alert released May 10.
The condition linked to all products containing the second-generation antipsychotic is called Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms, or DRESS. Symptoms of DRESS include a rash that can spread to all parts of the body, fever, swollen lymph nodes, and swelling. In addition, DRESS can result in injury to the liver, kidneys, lungs, heart, or pancreas, and it also can lead to death. The mortality tied to DRESS can reach 10%, the FDA said.
The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database has identified 23 cases worldwide of DRESS resulting from olanzapine since 1996, including one patient who died. Currently, the only way to treat DRESS is to withdraw the drug promptly. “Health care professionals should immediately stop treatment with olanzapine if DRESS is suspected,” the safety alert states. “The important ways to manage DRESS are early recognition of the syndrome, discontinuation of the offending agent as soon as possible, and supportive care.”
Olanzapine, used to treat schizophrenia and manic episodes of bipolar disorder, is available in generic versions. The medication also is available under the brand names Zyprexa, Zyprexa Zydis, Zyprexa Relprevv, and Symbyax. The agency said it would add a warning describing DRESS to the labels of drugs containing olanzapine.
Read the full safety alert on the FDA website.
CASE REPORTS: Transient neutrophilia in acute mania
A description of two bipolar I disorder cases presents examples of the phenomenon of transient neutrophilia that occurred during admission into a state psychiatric hospital. A brief review of the mechanisms that may explain this hematologic response is included.
Background
In 1889, the U.S. territory of New Mexico established the New Mexico Insane Asylum, and it was known as such until 1955, when it became the State Hospital. In 1970, it became the Las Vegas Medical Center but changed its name in 2005 to the New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute (NMBHI), which services the entire state for inpatient and long-term care patients. On average, it accepts two admissions per day, of which two patients per month present with neutrophilia (white blood cell [WBC] count greater than 11,000), which resolves after 1-4 days in the hospital.
Case presentations
Case one. A 21-year-old Native American man presented with multiple psychiatric admissions for bipolar I disorder and major depression with suicidal ideation. He was brought into the local emergency department by police, who found him walking down the interstate highway trying to hitch a ride back to his native pueblo after a disagreement with a fellow resident at a local boarding home. He had discontinued his Seroquel and lithium 2 weeks earlier because he felt he no longer needed them and required medical clearance for admission.1 His presenting hemogram in the ED was normal except for an elevated WBC count of 20,000. His vital signs were normal except for tachycardia of 110 beats per minute. On exam the patient demonstrated a flat affect and anxiety but other than mild ingrown toenails and tachycardia, there were no abnormal findings.
He received a chest x-ray and abdominal computed tomography scan that were both normal, and the patient was cleared for admission. He was cooperative with staff and restarted his lithium. A repeat WBC at day 5 was 9,700.

Case two. A 24-year-old white man with a history of bipolar I disorder and dependency on benzodiazepines and Ritalin was transferred from a distant county jail after 10 days of incarceration. He started screaming in his cell, praying, and perseverating that he “needed to kill himself,” which triggered his transfer to the NMBHI. His aggressive behavior upon arrival necessitated a transfer to the local ED for sedation and four-point restraints. He received Versed and Ativan IVP before allowing a blood collection, which revealed dehydration and a WBC count of 17,100. After 4 L of normal saline, his labs normalized with a WBC of 10,100, and he was admitted for a 7-day committal.
Discussion
Neutrophilia can result from granulocytes moving from pericapillary tissue margins into the circulating pool.2 It may occur in association with vigorous exercise, seizures, paroxysmal tachycardia, and adrenergic stress.3 The duration is fewer than 30 minutes and usually results in WBC counts of 15,000-20,000.4 Beta receptors on endothelial cells may mediate neutrophil adherence and release from marginal sites. A left shift is absent, because there is no change of the inflow of cells from the marrow.
In these two cases, a transient neutrophilia and tachycardia were observed. Neither case was febrile, and the platelet count remained normal. Both patients voluntarily stopped taking their lithium about 2 weeks before decompensating from bipolar I disorders. Stress was evident in both cases, one from walking on a cold December night after a disagreement, while the other patient in case two was highly agitated and aggressive requiring four-point restraints and intravenous sedation in the ED before admission to NMBHI. Past histories of psychiatric admissions were noted in both cases, and neither subject smoked tobacco – which can increase WBC by 25%-50% with the use of one-two packs per day, respectively.5
These two cases show that clinicians should consider stress in its many permutations to the long list of causes to explain elevated WBC, particularly in the ED. They also illustrate the power of antianxiety medications for some patients with acute mania who present to the ED.
References
1. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(5):866-70.
2. “Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology,” Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1981, p.1292.
3. “Diagnostic Hematology,” London: Springer, 2009, p. 324.
4. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(6):454-56.
5. Euro Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(14)1365-72.
Dr. Taylor is a staff physician affiliated with the New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute, New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe. He reports no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest. The author wishes to thank Dr. Dan Collins from the NMBHI for recommending that he research and write about this topic. In addition, document access was greatly aided by Lisa Apodaca and Mary Bunker, CNP, from the NMBHI, and Karen Ebler and Dr. Irwin Hoffman from Christus St. Vincent Hospital in Santa Fe. Finally, the following colleagues helped by proofreading the manuscript: Dr. Wendy Dimmette, Dr. Richard Nail, and Dr. Matt Streicherz. Eva Romero and Dr. Troy Jones provided useful historical documentation.
A description of two bipolar I disorder cases presents examples of the phenomenon of transient neutrophilia that occurred during admission into a state psychiatric hospital. A brief review of the mechanisms that may explain this hematologic response is included.
Background
In 1889, the U.S. territory of New Mexico established the New Mexico Insane Asylum, and it was known as such until 1955, when it became the State Hospital. In 1970, it became the Las Vegas Medical Center but changed its name in 2005 to the New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute (NMBHI), which services the entire state for inpatient and long-term care patients. On average, it accepts two admissions per day, of which two patients per month present with neutrophilia (white blood cell [WBC] count greater than 11,000), which resolves after 1-4 days in the hospital.
Case presentations
Case one. A 21-year-old Native American man presented with multiple psychiatric admissions for bipolar I disorder and major depression with suicidal ideation. He was brought into the local emergency department by police, who found him walking down the interstate highway trying to hitch a ride back to his native pueblo after a disagreement with a fellow resident at a local boarding home. He had discontinued his Seroquel and lithium 2 weeks earlier because he felt he no longer needed them and required medical clearance for admission.1 His presenting hemogram in the ED was normal except for an elevated WBC count of 20,000. His vital signs were normal except for tachycardia of 110 beats per minute. On exam the patient demonstrated a flat affect and anxiety but other than mild ingrown toenails and tachycardia, there were no abnormal findings.
He received a chest x-ray and abdominal computed tomography scan that were both normal, and the patient was cleared for admission. He was cooperative with staff and restarted his lithium. A repeat WBC at day 5 was 9,700.

Case two. A 24-year-old white man with a history of bipolar I disorder and dependency on benzodiazepines and Ritalin was transferred from a distant county jail after 10 days of incarceration. He started screaming in his cell, praying, and perseverating that he “needed to kill himself,” which triggered his transfer to the NMBHI. His aggressive behavior upon arrival necessitated a transfer to the local ED for sedation and four-point restraints. He received Versed and Ativan IVP before allowing a blood collection, which revealed dehydration and a WBC count of 17,100. After 4 L of normal saline, his labs normalized with a WBC of 10,100, and he was admitted for a 7-day committal.
Discussion
Neutrophilia can result from granulocytes moving from pericapillary tissue margins into the circulating pool.2 It may occur in association with vigorous exercise, seizures, paroxysmal tachycardia, and adrenergic stress.3 The duration is fewer than 30 minutes and usually results in WBC counts of 15,000-20,000.4 Beta receptors on endothelial cells may mediate neutrophil adherence and release from marginal sites. A left shift is absent, because there is no change of the inflow of cells from the marrow.
In these two cases, a transient neutrophilia and tachycardia were observed. Neither case was febrile, and the platelet count remained normal. Both patients voluntarily stopped taking their lithium about 2 weeks before decompensating from bipolar I disorders. Stress was evident in both cases, one from walking on a cold December night after a disagreement, while the other patient in case two was highly agitated and aggressive requiring four-point restraints and intravenous sedation in the ED before admission to NMBHI. Past histories of psychiatric admissions were noted in both cases, and neither subject smoked tobacco – which can increase WBC by 25%-50% with the use of one-two packs per day, respectively.5
These two cases show that clinicians should consider stress in its many permutations to the long list of causes to explain elevated WBC, particularly in the ED. They also illustrate the power of antianxiety medications for some patients with acute mania who present to the ED.
References
1. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(5):866-70.
2. “Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology,” Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1981, p.1292.
3. “Diagnostic Hematology,” London: Springer, 2009, p. 324.
4. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(6):454-56.
5. Euro Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(14)1365-72.
Dr. Taylor is a staff physician affiliated with the New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute, New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe. He reports no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest. The author wishes to thank Dr. Dan Collins from the NMBHI for recommending that he research and write about this topic. In addition, document access was greatly aided by Lisa Apodaca and Mary Bunker, CNP, from the NMBHI, and Karen Ebler and Dr. Irwin Hoffman from Christus St. Vincent Hospital in Santa Fe. Finally, the following colleagues helped by proofreading the manuscript: Dr. Wendy Dimmette, Dr. Richard Nail, and Dr. Matt Streicherz. Eva Romero and Dr. Troy Jones provided useful historical documentation.
A description of two bipolar I disorder cases presents examples of the phenomenon of transient neutrophilia that occurred during admission into a state psychiatric hospital. A brief review of the mechanisms that may explain this hematologic response is included.
Background
In 1889, the U.S. territory of New Mexico established the New Mexico Insane Asylum, and it was known as such until 1955, when it became the State Hospital. In 1970, it became the Las Vegas Medical Center but changed its name in 2005 to the New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute (NMBHI), which services the entire state for inpatient and long-term care patients. On average, it accepts two admissions per day, of which two patients per month present with neutrophilia (white blood cell [WBC] count greater than 11,000), which resolves after 1-4 days in the hospital.
Case presentations
Case one. A 21-year-old Native American man presented with multiple psychiatric admissions for bipolar I disorder and major depression with suicidal ideation. He was brought into the local emergency department by police, who found him walking down the interstate highway trying to hitch a ride back to his native pueblo after a disagreement with a fellow resident at a local boarding home. He had discontinued his Seroquel and lithium 2 weeks earlier because he felt he no longer needed them and required medical clearance for admission.1 His presenting hemogram in the ED was normal except for an elevated WBC count of 20,000. His vital signs were normal except for tachycardia of 110 beats per minute. On exam the patient demonstrated a flat affect and anxiety but other than mild ingrown toenails and tachycardia, there were no abnormal findings.
He received a chest x-ray and abdominal computed tomography scan that were both normal, and the patient was cleared for admission. He was cooperative with staff and restarted his lithium. A repeat WBC at day 5 was 9,700.

Case two. A 24-year-old white man with a history of bipolar I disorder and dependency on benzodiazepines and Ritalin was transferred from a distant county jail after 10 days of incarceration. He started screaming in his cell, praying, and perseverating that he “needed to kill himself,” which triggered his transfer to the NMBHI. His aggressive behavior upon arrival necessitated a transfer to the local ED for sedation and four-point restraints. He received Versed and Ativan IVP before allowing a blood collection, which revealed dehydration and a WBC count of 17,100. After 4 L of normal saline, his labs normalized with a WBC of 10,100, and he was admitted for a 7-day committal.
Discussion
Neutrophilia can result from granulocytes moving from pericapillary tissue margins into the circulating pool.2 It may occur in association with vigorous exercise, seizures, paroxysmal tachycardia, and adrenergic stress.3 The duration is fewer than 30 minutes and usually results in WBC counts of 15,000-20,000.4 Beta receptors on endothelial cells may mediate neutrophil adherence and release from marginal sites. A left shift is absent, because there is no change of the inflow of cells from the marrow.
In these two cases, a transient neutrophilia and tachycardia were observed. Neither case was febrile, and the platelet count remained normal. Both patients voluntarily stopped taking their lithium about 2 weeks before decompensating from bipolar I disorders. Stress was evident in both cases, one from walking on a cold December night after a disagreement, while the other patient in case two was highly agitated and aggressive requiring four-point restraints and intravenous sedation in the ED before admission to NMBHI. Past histories of psychiatric admissions were noted in both cases, and neither subject smoked tobacco – which can increase WBC by 25%-50% with the use of one-two packs per day, respectively.5
These two cases show that clinicians should consider stress in its many permutations to the long list of causes to explain elevated WBC, particularly in the ED. They also illustrate the power of antianxiety medications for some patients with acute mania who present to the ED.
References
1. J Emerg Med. 2012;43(5):866-70.
2. “Wintrobe’s Clinical Hematology,” Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1981, p.1292.
3. “Diagnostic Hematology,” London: Springer, 2009, p. 324.
4. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(6):454-56.
5. Euro Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(14)1365-72.
Dr. Taylor is a staff physician affiliated with the New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute, New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe. He reports no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest. The author wishes to thank Dr. Dan Collins from the NMBHI for recommending that he research and write about this topic. In addition, document access was greatly aided by Lisa Apodaca and Mary Bunker, CNP, from the NMBHI, and Karen Ebler and Dr. Irwin Hoffman from Christus St. Vincent Hospital in Santa Fe. Finally, the following colleagues helped by proofreading the manuscript: Dr. Wendy Dimmette, Dr. Richard Nail, and Dr. Matt Streicherz. Eva Romero and Dr. Troy Jones provided useful historical documentation.
Fetal malformation risk not increased after exposure to lamotrigine
A new analysis of registry data from European countries does not support a risk of orofacial cleft and clubfoot with exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy, in contrast to signals from previous studies of the antiepileptic drug.
First author Helen Dolk, Dr.P.H., professor of epidemiology and health services research and the head of the center for maternal, fetal, and infant research at the University of Ulster in Coleraine, Northern Ireland, and her colleagues analyzed data from 10.1 million births exposed to antiepileptic drugs including lamotrigine (Lamictal) as a monotherapy during the first trimester between 1995 and 2011. The births were recorded in 21 population-based registries from 16 European countries. The outcomes of interest were major congenital malformations in general, as well as orofacial clefts and clubfoot (Neurology. 2016 April 6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002540).
Assessment of all antiepileptic drug-exposed congenital malformation registrations revealed that 12% of pregnant registrants were exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy, with an additional 7% exposed to lamotrigine as part of polytherapy. A total of 77.1% of pregnant women exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy had records indicative of a diagnosis of epilepsy. The proportion of lamotrigine monotherapy exposures was observed to have increased over the study period, likely based on a movement away from the traditional use of valproate because of teratogenic concerns.
A total of 147 lamotrigine monotherapy-exposed babies with congenital malformations not attributable to chromosomal irregularities were identified from the total sample. The odds ratio for having a child with orofacial clefts after exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy was 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.33). Based on these data, the authors said they estimated exposure to lamotrigine would result in orofacial clefts in fewer than 1 in every 550 exposed babies.
The odds ratio for having a child with clubfoot after exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.01-3.31). Although the study results confirmed the statistically significant signal for an overall excess of clubfoot risk found in a previous study conducted by this research team that analyzed births during 1995-2005, the investigators could not reproduce this result in an independent study population of 6.3 million births during 2005-2011(odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.66-3.08). There were no significant differences in the risk for developing any other congenital malformations associated with lamotrigine monotherapy, the investigators said.
The authors said their results were in accord with those from several previous studies that did not detect an increased risk of orofacial clefts. In addition, they said statistically significant independent evidence of a clubfoot excess was not detected in the current study, despite findings from their previous study suggesting an increased risk.
The EUROCAT Central Database was funded by the EU Public Health Programme. GlaxoSmithKline, which markets lamotrigine, provided a grant for additional funding of this study. Dr. Dolk and her coauthors reported that their institutions received funding from GlaxoSmithKline for data or staff time contributed to this study.
A new analysis of registry data from European countries does not support a risk of orofacial cleft and clubfoot with exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy, in contrast to signals from previous studies of the antiepileptic drug.
First author Helen Dolk, Dr.P.H., professor of epidemiology and health services research and the head of the center for maternal, fetal, and infant research at the University of Ulster in Coleraine, Northern Ireland, and her colleagues analyzed data from 10.1 million births exposed to antiepileptic drugs including lamotrigine (Lamictal) as a monotherapy during the first trimester between 1995 and 2011. The births were recorded in 21 population-based registries from 16 European countries. The outcomes of interest were major congenital malformations in general, as well as orofacial clefts and clubfoot (Neurology. 2016 April 6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002540).
Assessment of all antiepileptic drug-exposed congenital malformation registrations revealed that 12% of pregnant registrants were exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy, with an additional 7% exposed to lamotrigine as part of polytherapy. A total of 77.1% of pregnant women exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy had records indicative of a diagnosis of epilepsy. The proportion of lamotrigine monotherapy exposures was observed to have increased over the study period, likely based on a movement away from the traditional use of valproate because of teratogenic concerns.
A total of 147 lamotrigine monotherapy-exposed babies with congenital malformations not attributable to chromosomal irregularities were identified from the total sample. The odds ratio for having a child with orofacial clefts after exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy was 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.33). Based on these data, the authors said they estimated exposure to lamotrigine would result in orofacial clefts in fewer than 1 in every 550 exposed babies.
The odds ratio for having a child with clubfoot after exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.01-3.31). Although the study results confirmed the statistically significant signal for an overall excess of clubfoot risk found in a previous study conducted by this research team that analyzed births during 1995-2005, the investigators could not reproduce this result in an independent study population of 6.3 million births during 2005-2011(odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.66-3.08). There were no significant differences in the risk for developing any other congenital malformations associated with lamotrigine monotherapy, the investigators said.
The authors said their results were in accord with those from several previous studies that did not detect an increased risk of orofacial clefts. In addition, they said statistically significant independent evidence of a clubfoot excess was not detected in the current study, despite findings from their previous study suggesting an increased risk.
The EUROCAT Central Database was funded by the EU Public Health Programme. GlaxoSmithKline, which markets lamotrigine, provided a grant for additional funding of this study. Dr. Dolk and her coauthors reported that their institutions received funding from GlaxoSmithKline for data or staff time contributed to this study.
A new analysis of registry data from European countries does not support a risk of orofacial cleft and clubfoot with exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy, in contrast to signals from previous studies of the antiepileptic drug.
First author Helen Dolk, Dr.P.H., professor of epidemiology and health services research and the head of the center for maternal, fetal, and infant research at the University of Ulster in Coleraine, Northern Ireland, and her colleagues analyzed data from 10.1 million births exposed to antiepileptic drugs including lamotrigine (Lamictal) as a monotherapy during the first trimester between 1995 and 2011. The births were recorded in 21 population-based registries from 16 European countries. The outcomes of interest were major congenital malformations in general, as well as orofacial clefts and clubfoot (Neurology. 2016 April 6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002540).
Assessment of all antiepileptic drug-exposed congenital malformation registrations revealed that 12% of pregnant registrants were exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy, with an additional 7% exposed to lamotrigine as part of polytherapy. A total of 77.1% of pregnant women exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy had records indicative of a diagnosis of epilepsy. The proportion of lamotrigine monotherapy exposures was observed to have increased over the study period, likely based on a movement away from the traditional use of valproate because of teratogenic concerns.
A total of 147 lamotrigine monotherapy-exposed babies with congenital malformations not attributable to chromosomal irregularities were identified from the total sample. The odds ratio for having a child with orofacial clefts after exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy was 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 0.73-2.33). Based on these data, the authors said they estimated exposure to lamotrigine would result in orofacial clefts in fewer than 1 in every 550 exposed babies.
The odds ratio for having a child with clubfoot after exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.01-3.31). Although the study results confirmed the statistically significant signal for an overall excess of clubfoot risk found in a previous study conducted by this research team that analyzed births during 1995-2005, the investigators could not reproduce this result in an independent study population of 6.3 million births during 2005-2011(odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.66-3.08). There were no significant differences in the risk for developing any other congenital malformations associated with lamotrigine monotherapy, the investigators said.
The authors said their results were in accord with those from several previous studies that did not detect an increased risk of orofacial clefts. In addition, they said statistically significant independent evidence of a clubfoot excess was not detected in the current study, despite findings from their previous study suggesting an increased risk.
The EUROCAT Central Database was funded by the EU Public Health Programme. GlaxoSmithKline, which markets lamotrigine, provided a grant for additional funding of this study. Dr. Dolk and her coauthors reported that their institutions received funding from GlaxoSmithKline for data or staff time contributed to this study.
FROM NEUROLOGY
Key clinical point:Babies born to mothers exposed to lamotrigine monotherapy do not show evidence for an increased incidence of orofacial clefts or clubfoot.
Major finding: The odds ratios for having a child with orofacial clefts or clubfoot after exposure to lamotrigine monotherapy were 1.31 and 1.83, respectively.
Data source: A 16-year, observational study comparing the rate of lamotrigine exposure among births with orofacial clefts or clubfoot in 10.1 million births recorded in 21 population-based registries from 16 European countries.
Disclosures: The EUROCAT Central Database was funded by the EU Public Health Programme. GlaxoSmithKline, which markets lamotrigine, provided a grant for additional funding of this study. Dr. Dolk and her coauthors reported that their institutions received funding from GlaxoSmithKline for data or staff time contributed to this study.
Decline in depression symptoms followed less than standard number of ketamine doses
Ketamine was 80% effective at decreasing depression symptoms, in a study of 100 depression patients who received less frequent and lower total doses of ketamine than are typically administered to treat depression.
Each study participant received no more than one ketamine intravenous infusion per week, with 4.3 having been the average total number of ketamine infusions received by a patient during the study. The frequency with which an infusion was received and the total number of infusions received by a patient were tailored to each patient’s responses to the therapy, according to the study’s author, Dr. Theodore Henderson. This study used a schedule of treatments for patients that differed from the established protocol for ketamine usage as an antidepressant, which is 3 times per week.
Prior to receiving the intravenous ketamine infusions, study participant’s Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR) score was 17.87 plus or minus 2.8 points, which corresponds to being severely depressed. The QIDS-SR score for each of the 80 study participants who responded to the therapy decreased by 10.8 plus or minus 3.5 points. The QIDS-SR of each of the 20 non-responders to the therapy changed by 0.8 plus or minus 1.8 points.
This study showed “clinical improvement with much fewer infusions for most patients. From a mechanistic standpoint, this can only be possible if ketamine is inducing increased BDNF [brain-derived neurotrophic factor] which leads to lasting changes in synapses, dendrites, and neuronal circuits,” Dr. Henderson said.
The study participants comprised 80 patients with recurrent unipolar depression and 20 patients with recurrent bipolar depression from Neuro-Luminance Ketamine Infusion Centers. Side effects experienced by the patients included elevated blood pressure, nausea, and dizziness, which was very common.
“Further controlled studies of the best clinical methods for ketamine infusion therapy are encouraged.” Dr. Henderson said.
Read the study in Neural Regeneration Research (doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.177708).
Ketamine was 80% effective at decreasing depression symptoms, in a study of 100 depression patients who received less frequent and lower total doses of ketamine than are typically administered to treat depression.
Each study participant received no more than one ketamine intravenous infusion per week, with 4.3 having been the average total number of ketamine infusions received by a patient during the study. The frequency with which an infusion was received and the total number of infusions received by a patient were tailored to each patient’s responses to the therapy, according to the study’s author, Dr. Theodore Henderson. This study used a schedule of treatments for patients that differed from the established protocol for ketamine usage as an antidepressant, which is 3 times per week.
Prior to receiving the intravenous ketamine infusions, study participant’s Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR) score was 17.87 plus or minus 2.8 points, which corresponds to being severely depressed. The QIDS-SR score for each of the 80 study participants who responded to the therapy decreased by 10.8 plus or minus 3.5 points. The QIDS-SR of each of the 20 non-responders to the therapy changed by 0.8 plus or minus 1.8 points.
This study showed “clinical improvement with much fewer infusions for most patients. From a mechanistic standpoint, this can only be possible if ketamine is inducing increased BDNF [brain-derived neurotrophic factor] which leads to lasting changes in synapses, dendrites, and neuronal circuits,” Dr. Henderson said.
The study participants comprised 80 patients with recurrent unipolar depression and 20 patients with recurrent bipolar depression from Neuro-Luminance Ketamine Infusion Centers. Side effects experienced by the patients included elevated blood pressure, nausea, and dizziness, which was very common.
“Further controlled studies of the best clinical methods for ketamine infusion therapy are encouraged.” Dr. Henderson said.
Read the study in Neural Regeneration Research (doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.177708).
Ketamine was 80% effective at decreasing depression symptoms, in a study of 100 depression patients who received less frequent and lower total doses of ketamine than are typically administered to treat depression.
Each study participant received no more than one ketamine intravenous infusion per week, with 4.3 having been the average total number of ketamine infusions received by a patient during the study. The frequency with which an infusion was received and the total number of infusions received by a patient were tailored to each patient’s responses to the therapy, according to the study’s author, Dr. Theodore Henderson. This study used a schedule of treatments for patients that differed from the established protocol for ketamine usage as an antidepressant, which is 3 times per week.
Prior to receiving the intravenous ketamine infusions, study participant’s Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report (QIDS-SR) score was 17.87 plus or minus 2.8 points, which corresponds to being severely depressed. The QIDS-SR score for each of the 80 study participants who responded to the therapy decreased by 10.8 plus or minus 3.5 points. The QIDS-SR of each of the 20 non-responders to the therapy changed by 0.8 plus or minus 1.8 points.
This study showed “clinical improvement with much fewer infusions for most patients. From a mechanistic standpoint, this can only be possible if ketamine is inducing increased BDNF [brain-derived neurotrophic factor] which leads to lasting changes in synapses, dendrites, and neuronal circuits,” Dr. Henderson said.
The study participants comprised 80 patients with recurrent unipolar depression and 20 patients with recurrent bipolar depression from Neuro-Luminance Ketamine Infusion Centers. Side effects experienced by the patients included elevated blood pressure, nausea, and dizziness, which was very common.
“Further controlled studies of the best clinical methods for ketamine infusion therapy are encouraged.” Dr. Henderson said.
Read the study in Neural Regeneration Research (doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.177708).
FROM NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH
Key differences found between patients with bipolar I, bipolar II
Second-generation antipsychotic use is associated with a previous incidence of psychiatric hospitalization in patients with bipolar disorder I but not in those with bipolar II, a study by Dr. Dong Yeon Park and associates shows.
The researchers found that the use of the second-generation agents (SGAs) was twice as common in the bipolar disorder I study group. Forty-four percent of 243 bipolar I patients used at least one of the antipsychotics, compared with 21.2% of 260 patients with bipolar disorder II.
Most bipolar I patients had a history of psychiatric hospitalization; however, hospitalization was significantly more common among patients in an SGA subgroup. In that group, more than 80% of those patients had a history of psychiatric hospitalization, compared with 58.1% of patients with bipolar I who were not taking SGAs. Comparatively, 12.7% of bipolar II patients taking SGAs had a history of psychiatric hospitalization, compared with 9.3% of bipolar II patients who were not taking SGAs.
Patients with bipolar I who were on SGAs also were more likely to be currently depressed, have current complex pharmacotherapy, and have a higher Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Version Overall Severity score. Meanwhile, bipolar disorder II patients taking SGAs were more likely to be currently using mood stabilizers than were bipolar II patients who were not taking SGAs, reported Dr. Park, of the department of psychiatry at Seoul National Hospital, South Korea.
“More research is needed to assess differential demographic and clinical correlates of current SGA use in patients with bipolar II disorder compared to bipolar I disorder. Challenges related to the variable expense and side effects of SGAs highlight the importance of increasing knowledge of the strengths and limitations of use of these agents in patients with different types of bipolar disorders,” the investigators concluded.
Find the study in the Journal of Psychiatric Research (doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.01.016).
Second-generation antipsychotic use is associated with a previous incidence of psychiatric hospitalization in patients with bipolar disorder I but not in those with bipolar II, a study by Dr. Dong Yeon Park and associates shows.
The researchers found that the use of the second-generation agents (SGAs) was twice as common in the bipolar disorder I study group. Forty-four percent of 243 bipolar I patients used at least one of the antipsychotics, compared with 21.2% of 260 patients with bipolar disorder II.
Most bipolar I patients had a history of psychiatric hospitalization; however, hospitalization was significantly more common among patients in an SGA subgroup. In that group, more than 80% of those patients had a history of psychiatric hospitalization, compared with 58.1% of patients with bipolar I who were not taking SGAs. Comparatively, 12.7% of bipolar II patients taking SGAs had a history of psychiatric hospitalization, compared with 9.3% of bipolar II patients who were not taking SGAs.
Patients with bipolar I who were on SGAs also were more likely to be currently depressed, have current complex pharmacotherapy, and have a higher Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Version Overall Severity score. Meanwhile, bipolar disorder II patients taking SGAs were more likely to be currently using mood stabilizers than were bipolar II patients who were not taking SGAs, reported Dr. Park, of the department of psychiatry at Seoul National Hospital, South Korea.
“More research is needed to assess differential demographic and clinical correlates of current SGA use in patients with bipolar II disorder compared to bipolar I disorder. Challenges related to the variable expense and side effects of SGAs highlight the importance of increasing knowledge of the strengths and limitations of use of these agents in patients with different types of bipolar disorders,” the investigators concluded.
Find the study in the Journal of Psychiatric Research (doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.01.016).
Second-generation antipsychotic use is associated with a previous incidence of psychiatric hospitalization in patients with bipolar disorder I but not in those with bipolar II, a study by Dr. Dong Yeon Park and associates shows.
The researchers found that the use of the second-generation agents (SGAs) was twice as common in the bipolar disorder I study group. Forty-four percent of 243 bipolar I patients used at least one of the antipsychotics, compared with 21.2% of 260 patients with bipolar disorder II.
Most bipolar I patients had a history of psychiatric hospitalization; however, hospitalization was significantly more common among patients in an SGA subgroup. In that group, more than 80% of those patients had a history of psychiatric hospitalization, compared with 58.1% of patients with bipolar I who were not taking SGAs. Comparatively, 12.7% of bipolar II patients taking SGAs had a history of psychiatric hospitalization, compared with 9.3% of bipolar II patients who were not taking SGAs.
Patients with bipolar I who were on SGAs also were more likely to be currently depressed, have current complex pharmacotherapy, and have a higher Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Version Overall Severity score. Meanwhile, bipolar disorder II patients taking SGAs were more likely to be currently using mood stabilizers than were bipolar II patients who were not taking SGAs, reported Dr. Park, of the department of psychiatry at Seoul National Hospital, South Korea.
“More research is needed to assess differential demographic and clinical correlates of current SGA use in patients with bipolar II disorder compared to bipolar I disorder. Challenges related to the variable expense and side effects of SGAs highlight the importance of increasing knowledge of the strengths and limitations of use of these agents in patients with different types of bipolar disorders,” the investigators concluded.
Find the study in the Journal of Psychiatric Research (doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.01.016).
FROM THE JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
Bipolar, low compliance tied to greater cognitive impairment
Patients with bipolar disorder and low levels of pharmacological treatment adherence have greater levels of cognitive impairment, according to Dr. Ileana Fuentes and her associates.
After taking a neurological battery, 12 bipolar disorder patients with low treatment adherence performed worse than did 22 bipolar disorder patients with high treatment adherence in nearly all cognitive functions tested, but the effect was significant in verbal memory testing. The low-adherence group performed significantly worse in verbal memory immediate free recall, immediate cued recall, delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall.
Other factors found to be associated with poorer executive function and processing speed were greater number of manic episodes, history of psychosis, and fewer years of education, reported Dr. Fuentes of the University of Guadalajara, Mexico.
“Despite limitations of the study, our findings are clinically important, and they contribute to better understanding of the cognitive profile in low compliance patients with bipolar disorder. Low compliance, cognitive performance, and asymptomatic phase are important markers in [bipolar disorder] for further studies,” the investigators noted.
Find the study here (J Affect Disord. 2016 May;195:215-20 [doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.005]).
Patients with bipolar disorder and low levels of pharmacological treatment adherence have greater levels of cognitive impairment, according to Dr. Ileana Fuentes and her associates.
After taking a neurological battery, 12 bipolar disorder patients with low treatment adherence performed worse than did 22 bipolar disorder patients with high treatment adherence in nearly all cognitive functions tested, but the effect was significant in verbal memory testing. The low-adherence group performed significantly worse in verbal memory immediate free recall, immediate cued recall, delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall.
Other factors found to be associated with poorer executive function and processing speed were greater number of manic episodes, history of psychosis, and fewer years of education, reported Dr. Fuentes of the University of Guadalajara, Mexico.
“Despite limitations of the study, our findings are clinically important, and they contribute to better understanding of the cognitive profile in low compliance patients with bipolar disorder. Low compliance, cognitive performance, and asymptomatic phase are important markers in [bipolar disorder] for further studies,” the investigators noted.
Find the study here (J Affect Disord. 2016 May;195:215-20 [doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.005]).
Patients with bipolar disorder and low levels of pharmacological treatment adherence have greater levels of cognitive impairment, according to Dr. Ileana Fuentes and her associates.
After taking a neurological battery, 12 bipolar disorder patients with low treatment adherence performed worse than did 22 bipolar disorder patients with high treatment adherence in nearly all cognitive functions tested, but the effect was significant in verbal memory testing. The low-adherence group performed significantly worse in verbal memory immediate free recall, immediate cued recall, delayed free recall, and delayed cued recall.
Other factors found to be associated with poorer executive function and processing speed were greater number of manic episodes, history of psychosis, and fewer years of education, reported Dr. Fuentes of the University of Guadalajara, Mexico.
“Despite limitations of the study, our findings are clinically important, and they contribute to better understanding of the cognitive profile in low compliance patients with bipolar disorder. Low compliance, cognitive performance, and asymptomatic phase are important markers in [bipolar disorder] for further studies,” the investigators noted.
Find the study here (J Affect Disord. 2016 May;195:215-20 [doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.005]).
FROM THE JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
ECT may improve course of bipolar disorder
Electroconvulsive therapy increased illness-free intervals and reduced manic and depressive episodes in bipolar patients, reported Dr. Gian Paolo Minnai of the psychiatry unit at San Martino Hospital in Oristano, Italy, and coauthors.
In a retrospective study of 41 patients with bipolar disorder, the investigators analyzed the number of episodes and admissions 5 years before and after ECT treatment. The duration of free intervals before and after ECT was also studied.
The results showed “significantly longer” free intervals after treatment (13.2 ± 9.0 months before ECT to 25.1 ± 19.1 months after treatment [t = 3.8; P less than .0001]), Dr. Minnai and colleagues reported. In addition, the analysis found “significant reductions” in the number of manic and depressive episodes (5.9 ± 3.0 before ECT to 1.0 ± 1.7 after treatment [t = 9.3; P less than .0001]) and admissions (2.2 ± 1.3 before ECT to 0.2 ± 0.5 after treatment [t = 9.4; P less than .0001]).
The study suggests that “it is plausible that ECT, along with suspending antidepressant treatment, might carry intrinsic stabilizing effect on the course of [bipolar disorder],” the authors concluded.
No financial conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Read the full article in the Journal of Affective Disorders (May 2016;195:180-4).
Electroconvulsive therapy increased illness-free intervals and reduced manic and depressive episodes in bipolar patients, reported Dr. Gian Paolo Minnai of the psychiatry unit at San Martino Hospital in Oristano, Italy, and coauthors.
In a retrospective study of 41 patients with bipolar disorder, the investigators analyzed the number of episodes and admissions 5 years before and after ECT treatment. The duration of free intervals before and after ECT was also studied.
The results showed “significantly longer” free intervals after treatment (13.2 ± 9.0 months before ECT to 25.1 ± 19.1 months after treatment [t = 3.8; P less than .0001]), Dr. Minnai and colleagues reported. In addition, the analysis found “significant reductions” in the number of manic and depressive episodes (5.9 ± 3.0 before ECT to 1.0 ± 1.7 after treatment [t = 9.3; P less than .0001]) and admissions (2.2 ± 1.3 before ECT to 0.2 ± 0.5 after treatment [t = 9.4; P less than .0001]).
The study suggests that “it is plausible that ECT, along with suspending antidepressant treatment, might carry intrinsic stabilizing effect on the course of [bipolar disorder],” the authors concluded.
No financial conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Read the full article in the Journal of Affective Disorders (May 2016;195:180-4).
Electroconvulsive therapy increased illness-free intervals and reduced manic and depressive episodes in bipolar patients, reported Dr. Gian Paolo Minnai of the psychiatry unit at San Martino Hospital in Oristano, Italy, and coauthors.
In a retrospective study of 41 patients with bipolar disorder, the investigators analyzed the number of episodes and admissions 5 years before and after ECT treatment. The duration of free intervals before and after ECT was also studied.
The results showed “significantly longer” free intervals after treatment (13.2 ± 9.0 months before ECT to 25.1 ± 19.1 months after treatment [t = 3.8; P less than .0001]), Dr. Minnai and colleagues reported. In addition, the analysis found “significant reductions” in the number of manic and depressive episodes (5.9 ± 3.0 before ECT to 1.0 ± 1.7 after treatment [t = 9.3; P less than .0001]) and admissions (2.2 ± 1.3 before ECT to 0.2 ± 0.5 after treatment [t = 9.4; P less than .0001]).
The study suggests that “it is plausible that ECT, along with suspending antidepressant treatment, might carry intrinsic stabilizing effect on the course of [bipolar disorder],” the authors concluded.
No financial conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Read the full article in the Journal of Affective Disorders (May 2016;195:180-4).
Childhood maltreatment tied to lifetime anxiety disorders in bipolar
Childhood maltreatment is associated with lifetime anxiety among people with bipolar disorder, Barbara Pavlova, Ph.D., and her associates reported.
The researchers recruited 174 adult outpatients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder I or bipolar disorder II, of whom 29% had one anxiety disorder and 20% had two or more. More than half (56%) of the patients were female, and their median age was 42. The types of anxiety disorders among the patients ranged from generalized anxiety disorder (28%) to obsessive-compulsive disorder (4%).
Dr. Pavlova and her associates assessed the patients’ history of maltreatment in childhood using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), a 28-item self-report measure that asks about emotional, physical, and sexual abuse and about emotional and physical neglect. Anxiety disorders were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), wrote Dr. Pavlova of the psychiatry department at Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S.
They found that childhood maltreatment, indexed by higher CTQ total scores, was linked to a higher number of lifetime anxiety disorders (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.14; P = .04). In addition, panic disorder was most strongly tied to childhood maltreatment (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.28-4.02; P = .01).
The results suggest “that bipolar disorder with comorbid anxiety constitutes an [etiologic] subtype shaped to a greater extent by early environment,” the investigators wrote.
Read the full study here: (J Affect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;192:22-7).
On Twittter @ginalhenderson
Childhood maltreatment is associated with lifetime anxiety among people with bipolar disorder, Barbara Pavlova, Ph.D., and her associates reported.
The researchers recruited 174 adult outpatients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder I or bipolar disorder II, of whom 29% had one anxiety disorder and 20% had two or more. More than half (56%) of the patients were female, and their median age was 42. The types of anxiety disorders among the patients ranged from generalized anxiety disorder (28%) to obsessive-compulsive disorder (4%).
Dr. Pavlova and her associates assessed the patients’ history of maltreatment in childhood using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), a 28-item self-report measure that asks about emotional, physical, and sexual abuse and about emotional and physical neglect. Anxiety disorders were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), wrote Dr. Pavlova of the psychiatry department at Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S.
They found that childhood maltreatment, indexed by higher CTQ total scores, was linked to a higher number of lifetime anxiety disorders (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.14; P = .04). In addition, panic disorder was most strongly tied to childhood maltreatment (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.28-4.02; P = .01).
The results suggest “that bipolar disorder with comorbid anxiety constitutes an [etiologic] subtype shaped to a greater extent by early environment,” the investigators wrote.
Read the full study here: (J Affect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;192:22-7).
On Twittter @ginalhenderson
Childhood maltreatment is associated with lifetime anxiety among people with bipolar disorder, Barbara Pavlova, Ph.D., and her associates reported.
The researchers recruited 174 adult outpatients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder I or bipolar disorder II, of whom 29% had one anxiety disorder and 20% had two or more. More than half (56%) of the patients were female, and their median age was 42. The types of anxiety disorders among the patients ranged from generalized anxiety disorder (28%) to obsessive-compulsive disorder (4%).
Dr. Pavlova and her associates assessed the patients’ history of maltreatment in childhood using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), a 28-item self-report measure that asks about emotional, physical, and sexual abuse and about emotional and physical neglect. Anxiety disorders were assessed using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), wrote Dr. Pavlova of the psychiatry department at Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S.
They found that childhood maltreatment, indexed by higher CTQ total scores, was linked to a higher number of lifetime anxiety disorders (odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.14; P = .04). In addition, panic disorder was most strongly tied to childhood maltreatment (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.28-4.02; P = .01).
The results suggest “that bipolar disorder with comorbid anxiety constitutes an [etiologic] subtype shaped to a greater extent by early environment,” the investigators wrote.
Read the full study here: (J Affect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;192:22-7).
On Twittter @ginalhenderson
FROM THE JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Use preventive strategies to lower cardiovascular risks in bipolar I
The significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction or stroke in patients with bipolar I disorder appears to be tied more to preventive factors than to cardiovascular risk factors. However, bipolar I patients with a history of psychosis have an marginally increased risk of MI or stroke, a population-based cohort study showed.
The researchers came to those conclusions after analyzing residents’ health records and death certificates in Olmsted County, Minn., which were contained within the Rochester Epidemiology Project database. The study’s participants included 334 patients with bipolar I disorder and 334 people without bipolar disorder, although one of the patients who did not have bipolar I at the beginning of the study was later diagnosed with the disorder. All participants had been residents of Olmsted County from Jan. 1, 1966, through Dec. 31,1996.
Patients continued to be followed until Dec. 31, 2013, unless one of the following events occurred before that date: the patient had an MI or stroke, was lost to follow-up, or died before the end of the study. A patient experiencing an MI, stroke, or death or a patient disappearing from the database triggered an end to that patient’s participation in the study.
When an individual having an MI or a stroke was treated as a composite outcome, bipolar I disorder patients had a significantly increased risk of experiencing a fatal or non-fatal MI or stroke, compared with the individuals in the control group (P = .04). The risk was no longer significant after the researchers adjusted for the following potential baseline confounders of the association between bipolar disorder and cardiovascular disease: alcohol use disorder, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking (P = .46).
Meanwhile, a secondary analysis of the data showed that history of psychosis was indeed tied to a marginally increased risk of MI or stroke (P =.06).
“It will be fundamental to improve current preventive strategies to decrease the prevalence of smoking, alcohol use, hypertension, and diabetes among patients with bipolar disorder,” said Dr. Miguel L. Prieto of the department of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues. “Moreover, we detected a possible higher risk of MI/stroke in the subgroup of patients with history of psychosis that certainly warrants replication.”
Future research also should seek to determine early biomarkers of atherosclerosis, the researchers said.
Read the study in Journal of Affective Disorders (doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.015).
The significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction or stroke in patients with bipolar I disorder appears to be tied more to preventive factors than to cardiovascular risk factors. However, bipolar I patients with a history of psychosis have an marginally increased risk of MI or stroke, a population-based cohort study showed.
The researchers came to those conclusions after analyzing residents’ health records and death certificates in Olmsted County, Minn., which were contained within the Rochester Epidemiology Project database. The study’s participants included 334 patients with bipolar I disorder and 334 people without bipolar disorder, although one of the patients who did not have bipolar I at the beginning of the study was later diagnosed with the disorder. All participants had been residents of Olmsted County from Jan. 1, 1966, through Dec. 31,1996.
Patients continued to be followed until Dec. 31, 2013, unless one of the following events occurred before that date: the patient had an MI or stroke, was lost to follow-up, or died before the end of the study. A patient experiencing an MI, stroke, or death or a patient disappearing from the database triggered an end to that patient’s participation in the study.
When an individual having an MI or a stroke was treated as a composite outcome, bipolar I disorder patients had a significantly increased risk of experiencing a fatal or non-fatal MI or stroke, compared with the individuals in the control group (P = .04). The risk was no longer significant after the researchers adjusted for the following potential baseline confounders of the association between bipolar disorder and cardiovascular disease: alcohol use disorder, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking (P = .46).
Meanwhile, a secondary analysis of the data showed that history of psychosis was indeed tied to a marginally increased risk of MI or stroke (P =.06).
“It will be fundamental to improve current preventive strategies to decrease the prevalence of smoking, alcohol use, hypertension, and diabetes among patients with bipolar disorder,” said Dr. Miguel L. Prieto of the department of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues. “Moreover, we detected a possible higher risk of MI/stroke in the subgroup of patients with history of psychosis that certainly warrants replication.”
Future research also should seek to determine early biomarkers of atherosclerosis, the researchers said.
Read the study in Journal of Affective Disorders (doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.015).
The significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction or stroke in patients with bipolar I disorder appears to be tied more to preventive factors than to cardiovascular risk factors. However, bipolar I patients with a history of psychosis have an marginally increased risk of MI or stroke, a population-based cohort study showed.
The researchers came to those conclusions after analyzing residents’ health records and death certificates in Olmsted County, Minn., which were contained within the Rochester Epidemiology Project database. The study’s participants included 334 patients with bipolar I disorder and 334 people without bipolar disorder, although one of the patients who did not have bipolar I at the beginning of the study was later diagnosed with the disorder. All participants had been residents of Olmsted County from Jan. 1, 1966, through Dec. 31,1996.
Patients continued to be followed until Dec. 31, 2013, unless one of the following events occurred before that date: the patient had an MI or stroke, was lost to follow-up, or died before the end of the study. A patient experiencing an MI, stroke, or death or a patient disappearing from the database triggered an end to that patient’s participation in the study.
When an individual having an MI or a stroke was treated as a composite outcome, bipolar I disorder patients had a significantly increased risk of experiencing a fatal or non-fatal MI or stroke, compared with the individuals in the control group (P = .04). The risk was no longer significant after the researchers adjusted for the following potential baseline confounders of the association between bipolar disorder and cardiovascular disease: alcohol use disorder, diabetes, hypertension, and smoking (P = .46).
Meanwhile, a secondary analysis of the data showed that history of psychosis was indeed tied to a marginally increased risk of MI or stroke (P =.06).
“It will be fundamental to improve current preventive strategies to decrease the prevalence of smoking, alcohol use, hypertension, and diabetes among patients with bipolar disorder,” said Dr. Miguel L. Prieto of the department of psychiatry and psychology at the Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minn., and his colleagues. “Moreover, we detected a possible higher risk of MI/stroke in the subgroup of patients with history of psychosis that certainly warrants replication.”
Future research also should seek to determine early biomarkers of atherosclerosis, the researchers said.
Read the study in Journal of Affective Disorders (doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.015).
FROM JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
An interview with film director Paul Dalio: Touched With Fire
In early December, I was fortunate to be invited to a film screening of “Touched With Fire,” starring Katie Holmes and Luke Kirby. The movie is about two young poets with bipolar disorder who meet and fall in love while on a psychiatric unit. It opens in theaters on Feb.12.
The screening was introduced by Johns Hopkins Hospital’s psychiatrist in chief Ray DePaulo and following the movie, director Paul Dalio and psychologist Kay Redfield Jamison, Ph.D., both gave short talks and answered questions. The movie was inspired by Dalio’s personal experience with bipolar disorder. Jamison, author of Touched With Fire: Manic-Depressive Illness and the Artistic Temperament (New York: Free Press, 1996) had offered hope to Dalio during a difficult moment with his illness. Numbed by the medications that made his moods tolerable, she had assured him that his creativity would reemerge, as indeed it did. Jamison’s book lent its name to the movie title, and she had a cameo role in the film. In the movie, Jamison, playing herself, tells the couple that it took a while for her moods to calibrate, but that medicines were a godsend and they helped her to become both happier and more productive.
“You’re concerned about losing your art and losing your passion,” Jamison says to Marco, the character played by Kirby. “Medication’s not going to take your personality away; it’s not going to take away your own gift. It’s a fire when it’s out of control, and what medication can do is tamp that down a bit without losing that gift.”
While this insight was helpful to the real-life Dalio, the character Marco struggles deeply as tries to hang on enough to love, work, and strive toward a future he longs for, all while mourning what he sees as the loss of himself. “I want the mania!” he tells Carla, played by Holmes, in one of the more poignant scenes.
Enough plot spoilers. The love story is emotional, and the portrayal of bipolar disorder is the best I have ever seen in the popular media. The characters are three-dimensional and about so much more than their illnesses, and many of the scenes ring so true. This is bipolar disorder with all its raw passion and pain laid out for an audience. No one has odd mannerisms and no one walks around dressed in plastic bags; instead, these are beautiful people ravaged by psychosis and the extremes of their moods, and when it’s not horrible, it’s absolutely wonderful.
In the question-and-answer session after the movie, a member of the audience asked Paul Dalio how to get treatment for someone who is manic. Dalio’s answer was swift: “You have to force them. There is no other way.” As someone who has been interested in patient responses to involuntary psychiatric care, I was a bit surprised to hear that answer from someone who has suffered with the condition and whom I presumed had been treated against his will. When I was asked a few weeks later if I’d like to interview Mr. Dalio, my answer was also swift: Yes, I would.
Dalio talked openly with me about his own psychiatric history, and he was quick to say that he shared Marco’s struggles. The love story that unfolded with Carla was fictional, but when I asked about several of the scenes, Dalio said, “Yes, that happened to me!”
Dalio has been admitted to the hospital four times, twice as an involuntary patient. “I know that in a manic state, no one is going to convince you to go into a hospital,” he said. “My experience was not good at all – it was horrific and frustrating – but it was the lesser of two evils. As difficult as it was, it doesn’t hold a candle to the pain. There is no way I can communicate the pain of bipolar depression.”
Like his character, Marco, Paul Dalio spent years ravaged by his illness. He worked in a warehouse, and he says that during those years he was not very likable. He credits his family with keeping him alive; his father would spend hours on the phone talking him out of committing suicide. The family researched treatment options, and eventually, Dalio began to travel from New York City to see a bipolar disorder expert in Baltimore. His treatment at Hopkins enabled his meeting with Kay Jamison.
“You can’t lie about this disorder,” Dalio said, “and you can’t sugarcoat it.”
Dalio’s life has done a turnaround from his days of being psychotic, suicidal, and unable to function. He holds a degree in screenwriting from New York University and has attended the NYU graduate program in filmmaking. He is married and has two small children.
I asked what helped.
“I resolved to stay on meds,” he said, “even if I felt numb. I don’t drink, not even a toast to the movie. I go to bed at 10 every night, drink green juices all day, use a light box, and take walks. Transcendental meditation helps. And patience – it took 3-5 years before I was really able to feel emotion again. I’ve been stable since 2007, but thriving since 2010, with rich emotions. I have a severe form of the condition.”
Dalio experiences symptoms if he misses even a couple of doses of medication, and with two toddlers, it can be difficult for his wife that he can’t help with the children in the middle of the night. It’s not all hard, though. “My wife is Eastern European, and she has a connection to the darkness. She was always attracted to crazy people and artists, and she finds a lot of pleasure in our lives.” Like Dalio, she is screenwriter, and they collaborate on their work.
Dalio is clear about his agenda for this movie. He sees his bipolar disorder as a gift that fuels creative pursuits, and he wants others to understand how people with this disorder struggle. He used the word “beautiful” to describe the intensity of emotions that Carla and Marco experience in the film, but tragedy and torment are also screaming on the big screen. His second agenda is a plug for mainstream psychiatry and a billboard for hope: take the medications, tolerate the downside, be patient; things will work out.
Well worth seeing.
Dr. Miller is a psychiatrist who practices in Baltimore.
In early December, I was fortunate to be invited to a film screening of “Touched With Fire,” starring Katie Holmes and Luke Kirby. The movie is about two young poets with bipolar disorder who meet and fall in love while on a psychiatric unit. It opens in theaters on Feb.12.
The screening was introduced by Johns Hopkins Hospital’s psychiatrist in chief Ray DePaulo and following the movie, director Paul Dalio and psychologist Kay Redfield Jamison, Ph.D., both gave short talks and answered questions. The movie was inspired by Dalio’s personal experience with bipolar disorder. Jamison, author of Touched With Fire: Manic-Depressive Illness and the Artistic Temperament (New York: Free Press, 1996) had offered hope to Dalio during a difficult moment with his illness. Numbed by the medications that made his moods tolerable, she had assured him that his creativity would reemerge, as indeed it did. Jamison’s book lent its name to the movie title, and she had a cameo role in the film. In the movie, Jamison, playing herself, tells the couple that it took a while for her moods to calibrate, but that medicines were a godsend and they helped her to become both happier and more productive.
“You’re concerned about losing your art and losing your passion,” Jamison says to Marco, the character played by Kirby. “Medication’s not going to take your personality away; it’s not going to take away your own gift. It’s a fire when it’s out of control, and what medication can do is tamp that down a bit without losing that gift.”
While this insight was helpful to the real-life Dalio, the character Marco struggles deeply as tries to hang on enough to love, work, and strive toward a future he longs for, all while mourning what he sees as the loss of himself. “I want the mania!” he tells Carla, played by Holmes, in one of the more poignant scenes.
Enough plot spoilers. The love story is emotional, and the portrayal of bipolar disorder is the best I have ever seen in the popular media. The characters are three-dimensional and about so much more than their illnesses, and many of the scenes ring so true. This is bipolar disorder with all its raw passion and pain laid out for an audience. No one has odd mannerisms and no one walks around dressed in plastic bags; instead, these are beautiful people ravaged by psychosis and the extremes of their moods, and when it’s not horrible, it’s absolutely wonderful.
In the question-and-answer session after the movie, a member of the audience asked Paul Dalio how to get treatment for someone who is manic. Dalio’s answer was swift: “You have to force them. There is no other way.” As someone who has been interested in patient responses to involuntary psychiatric care, I was a bit surprised to hear that answer from someone who has suffered with the condition and whom I presumed had been treated against his will. When I was asked a few weeks later if I’d like to interview Mr. Dalio, my answer was also swift: Yes, I would.
Dalio talked openly with me about his own psychiatric history, and he was quick to say that he shared Marco’s struggles. The love story that unfolded with Carla was fictional, but when I asked about several of the scenes, Dalio said, “Yes, that happened to me!”
Dalio has been admitted to the hospital four times, twice as an involuntary patient. “I know that in a manic state, no one is going to convince you to go into a hospital,” he said. “My experience was not good at all – it was horrific and frustrating – but it was the lesser of two evils. As difficult as it was, it doesn’t hold a candle to the pain. There is no way I can communicate the pain of bipolar depression.”
Like his character, Marco, Paul Dalio spent years ravaged by his illness. He worked in a warehouse, and he says that during those years he was not very likable. He credits his family with keeping him alive; his father would spend hours on the phone talking him out of committing suicide. The family researched treatment options, and eventually, Dalio began to travel from New York City to see a bipolar disorder expert in Baltimore. His treatment at Hopkins enabled his meeting with Kay Jamison.
“You can’t lie about this disorder,” Dalio said, “and you can’t sugarcoat it.”
Dalio’s life has done a turnaround from his days of being psychotic, suicidal, and unable to function. He holds a degree in screenwriting from New York University and has attended the NYU graduate program in filmmaking. He is married and has two small children.
I asked what helped.
“I resolved to stay on meds,” he said, “even if I felt numb. I don’t drink, not even a toast to the movie. I go to bed at 10 every night, drink green juices all day, use a light box, and take walks. Transcendental meditation helps. And patience – it took 3-5 years before I was really able to feel emotion again. I’ve been stable since 2007, but thriving since 2010, with rich emotions. I have a severe form of the condition.”
Dalio experiences symptoms if he misses even a couple of doses of medication, and with two toddlers, it can be difficult for his wife that he can’t help with the children in the middle of the night. It’s not all hard, though. “My wife is Eastern European, and she has a connection to the darkness. She was always attracted to crazy people and artists, and she finds a lot of pleasure in our lives.” Like Dalio, she is screenwriter, and they collaborate on their work.
Dalio is clear about his agenda for this movie. He sees his bipolar disorder as a gift that fuels creative pursuits, and he wants others to understand how people with this disorder struggle. He used the word “beautiful” to describe the intensity of emotions that Carla and Marco experience in the film, but tragedy and torment are also screaming on the big screen. His second agenda is a plug for mainstream psychiatry and a billboard for hope: take the medications, tolerate the downside, be patient; things will work out.
Well worth seeing.
Dr. Miller is a psychiatrist who practices in Baltimore.
In early December, I was fortunate to be invited to a film screening of “Touched With Fire,” starring Katie Holmes and Luke Kirby. The movie is about two young poets with bipolar disorder who meet and fall in love while on a psychiatric unit. It opens in theaters on Feb.12.
The screening was introduced by Johns Hopkins Hospital’s psychiatrist in chief Ray DePaulo and following the movie, director Paul Dalio and psychologist Kay Redfield Jamison, Ph.D., both gave short talks and answered questions. The movie was inspired by Dalio’s personal experience with bipolar disorder. Jamison, author of Touched With Fire: Manic-Depressive Illness and the Artistic Temperament (New York: Free Press, 1996) had offered hope to Dalio during a difficult moment with his illness. Numbed by the medications that made his moods tolerable, she had assured him that his creativity would reemerge, as indeed it did. Jamison’s book lent its name to the movie title, and she had a cameo role in the film. In the movie, Jamison, playing herself, tells the couple that it took a while for her moods to calibrate, but that medicines were a godsend and they helped her to become both happier and more productive.
“You’re concerned about losing your art and losing your passion,” Jamison says to Marco, the character played by Kirby. “Medication’s not going to take your personality away; it’s not going to take away your own gift. It’s a fire when it’s out of control, and what medication can do is tamp that down a bit without losing that gift.”
While this insight was helpful to the real-life Dalio, the character Marco struggles deeply as tries to hang on enough to love, work, and strive toward a future he longs for, all while mourning what he sees as the loss of himself. “I want the mania!” he tells Carla, played by Holmes, in one of the more poignant scenes.
Enough plot spoilers. The love story is emotional, and the portrayal of bipolar disorder is the best I have ever seen in the popular media. The characters are three-dimensional and about so much more than their illnesses, and many of the scenes ring so true. This is bipolar disorder with all its raw passion and pain laid out for an audience. No one has odd mannerisms and no one walks around dressed in plastic bags; instead, these are beautiful people ravaged by psychosis and the extremes of their moods, and when it’s not horrible, it’s absolutely wonderful.
In the question-and-answer session after the movie, a member of the audience asked Paul Dalio how to get treatment for someone who is manic. Dalio’s answer was swift: “You have to force them. There is no other way.” As someone who has been interested in patient responses to involuntary psychiatric care, I was a bit surprised to hear that answer from someone who has suffered with the condition and whom I presumed had been treated against his will. When I was asked a few weeks later if I’d like to interview Mr. Dalio, my answer was also swift: Yes, I would.
Dalio talked openly with me about his own psychiatric history, and he was quick to say that he shared Marco’s struggles. The love story that unfolded with Carla was fictional, but when I asked about several of the scenes, Dalio said, “Yes, that happened to me!”
Dalio has been admitted to the hospital four times, twice as an involuntary patient. “I know that in a manic state, no one is going to convince you to go into a hospital,” he said. “My experience was not good at all – it was horrific and frustrating – but it was the lesser of two evils. As difficult as it was, it doesn’t hold a candle to the pain. There is no way I can communicate the pain of bipolar depression.”
Like his character, Marco, Paul Dalio spent years ravaged by his illness. He worked in a warehouse, and he says that during those years he was not very likable. He credits his family with keeping him alive; his father would spend hours on the phone talking him out of committing suicide. The family researched treatment options, and eventually, Dalio began to travel from New York City to see a bipolar disorder expert in Baltimore. His treatment at Hopkins enabled his meeting with Kay Jamison.
“You can’t lie about this disorder,” Dalio said, “and you can’t sugarcoat it.”
Dalio’s life has done a turnaround from his days of being psychotic, suicidal, and unable to function. He holds a degree in screenwriting from New York University and has attended the NYU graduate program in filmmaking. He is married and has two small children.
I asked what helped.
“I resolved to stay on meds,” he said, “even if I felt numb. I don’t drink, not even a toast to the movie. I go to bed at 10 every night, drink green juices all day, use a light box, and take walks. Transcendental meditation helps. And patience – it took 3-5 years before I was really able to feel emotion again. I’ve been stable since 2007, but thriving since 2010, with rich emotions. I have a severe form of the condition.”
Dalio experiences symptoms if he misses even a couple of doses of medication, and with two toddlers, it can be difficult for his wife that he can’t help with the children in the middle of the night. It’s not all hard, though. “My wife is Eastern European, and she has a connection to the darkness. She was always attracted to crazy people and artists, and she finds a lot of pleasure in our lives.” Like Dalio, she is screenwriter, and they collaborate on their work.
Dalio is clear about his agenda for this movie. He sees his bipolar disorder as a gift that fuels creative pursuits, and he wants others to understand how people with this disorder struggle. He used the word “beautiful” to describe the intensity of emotions that Carla and Marco experience in the film, but tragedy and torment are also screaming on the big screen. His second agenda is a plug for mainstream psychiatry and a billboard for hope: take the medications, tolerate the downside, be patient; things will work out.
Well worth seeing.
Dr. Miller is a psychiatrist who practices in Baltimore.