User login
Bringing you the latest news, research and reviews, exclusive interviews, podcasts, quizzes, and more.
Powered by CHEST Physician, Clinician Reviews, MDedge Family Medicine, Internal Medicine News, and The Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management.
Yoga improves asthmatics’ quality of life, data review suggests
Yoga seems to improve the quality of life and symptoms of people with asthma, suggests a review of 15 randomized controlled trials comprising 1,048 patients with varying degrees of asthma severity.
The studies generally compared the outcomes for asthma patients participating in at least 2 weeks of yoga with the outcomes for those who were treated with usual care for asthma, a sham intervention, or no intervention.
Average improvements in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores of 0.57 units per item on a 7-point scale were found through an analysis of responses from 375 individuals, with each person having participated in one of the five randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While the average increase exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for this questionnaire, outcomes of two of the trials raise questions about whether the reported improvements in patients’ quality of life can be attributed to yoga. In those two trials, which included a placebo or sham intervention for some of the participants, no differences in these questionnaire scores were found following the interventions.
For 243 asthma patients who participated in three of the RCTs, on average, yoga improved their symptoms by 0.37 standard deviation units of the disease severity scores used.
“Our findings are preliminary and suggestive, rather than conclusive, and therefore should be interpreted cautiously. Yoga probably improves quality of life and symptoms in people with asthma to some extent. However, whether or not the improvements in symptoms exceed the MCID is uncertain due to lack of an established MCID for the severity scores used in the included studies,” noted Zu-Yao Yang of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and colleagues.
They used various methods to collect data, including searching the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials, which is derived from systematic searches of bibliographic databases, and hand-searching respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. They searched all databases from their inception to July 22, 2015, and placed no restriction on language of publication. All studies were parallel-group trials, except for one cross-over trial.
While two of the studies reported adverse events, four of the studies reported having investigated the occurrences of such types of incidents. One of the studies said three participants in its control group required oral steroids because of acute exacerbations of their asthma, but that these adverse events could not be counted as having been caused by yoga. Another study showed that one participant in its yoga group, who used the Pink City Lung Exerciser (a medical device used to mimic the typical patterns of yoga breathing), reported mild dyspnea during the exercise.
“[As] the included studies were mostly small in sample size and at high risk of bias, high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to confirm the effects of yoga,” the researchers said.
They reported that they had no known declarations of interest. The project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Airways Group.
The full review is available in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010346.pub2).
Yoga seems to improve the quality of life and symptoms of people with asthma, suggests a review of 15 randomized controlled trials comprising 1,048 patients with varying degrees of asthma severity.
The studies generally compared the outcomes for asthma patients participating in at least 2 weeks of yoga with the outcomes for those who were treated with usual care for asthma, a sham intervention, or no intervention.
Average improvements in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores of 0.57 units per item on a 7-point scale were found through an analysis of responses from 375 individuals, with each person having participated in one of the five randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While the average increase exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for this questionnaire, outcomes of two of the trials raise questions about whether the reported improvements in patients’ quality of life can be attributed to yoga. In those two trials, which included a placebo or sham intervention for some of the participants, no differences in these questionnaire scores were found following the interventions.
For 243 asthma patients who participated in three of the RCTs, on average, yoga improved their symptoms by 0.37 standard deviation units of the disease severity scores used.
“Our findings are preliminary and suggestive, rather than conclusive, and therefore should be interpreted cautiously. Yoga probably improves quality of life and symptoms in people with asthma to some extent. However, whether or not the improvements in symptoms exceed the MCID is uncertain due to lack of an established MCID for the severity scores used in the included studies,” noted Zu-Yao Yang of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and colleagues.
They used various methods to collect data, including searching the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials, which is derived from systematic searches of bibliographic databases, and hand-searching respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. They searched all databases from their inception to July 22, 2015, and placed no restriction on language of publication. All studies were parallel-group trials, except for one cross-over trial.
While two of the studies reported adverse events, four of the studies reported having investigated the occurrences of such types of incidents. One of the studies said three participants in its control group required oral steroids because of acute exacerbations of their asthma, but that these adverse events could not be counted as having been caused by yoga. Another study showed that one participant in its yoga group, who used the Pink City Lung Exerciser (a medical device used to mimic the typical patterns of yoga breathing), reported mild dyspnea during the exercise.
“[As] the included studies were mostly small in sample size and at high risk of bias, high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to confirm the effects of yoga,” the researchers said.
They reported that they had no known declarations of interest. The project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Airways Group.
The full review is available in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010346.pub2).
Yoga seems to improve the quality of life and symptoms of people with asthma, suggests a review of 15 randomized controlled trials comprising 1,048 patients with varying degrees of asthma severity.
The studies generally compared the outcomes for asthma patients participating in at least 2 weeks of yoga with the outcomes for those who were treated with usual care for asthma, a sham intervention, or no intervention.
Average improvements in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores of 0.57 units per item on a 7-point scale were found through an analysis of responses from 375 individuals, with each person having participated in one of the five randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While the average increase exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for this questionnaire, outcomes of two of the trials raise questions about whether the reported improvements in patients’ quality of life can be attributed to yoga. In those two trials, which included a placebo or sham intervention for some of the participants, no differences in these questionnaire scores were found following the interventions.
For 243 asthma patients who participated in three of the RCTs, on average, yoga improved their symptoms by 0.37 standard deviation units of the disease severity scores used.
“Our findings are preliminary and suggestive, rather than conclusive, and therefore should be interpreted cautiously. Yoga probably improves quality of life and symptoms in people with asthma to some extent. However, whether or not the improvements in symptoms exceed the MCID is uncertain due to lack of an established MCID for the severity scores used in the included studies,” noted Zu-Yao Yang of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and colleagues.
They used various methods to collect data, including searching the Cochrane Airways Group Register of Trials, which is derived from systematic searches of bibliographic databases, and hand-searching respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. They searched all databases from their inception to July 22, 2015, and placed no restriction on language of publication. All studies were parallel-group trials, except for one cross-over trial.
While two of the studies reported adverse events, four of the studies reported having investigated the occurrences of such types of incidents. One of the studies said three participants in its control group required oral steroids because of acute exacerbations of their asthma, but that these adverse events could not be counted as having been caused by yoga. Another study showed that one participant in its yoga group, who used the Pink City Lung Exerciser (a medical device used to mimic the typical patterns of yoga breathing), reported mild dyspnea during the exercise.
“[As] the included studies were mostly small in sample size and at high risk of bias, high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes are needed to confirm the effects of yoga,” the researchers said.
They reported that they had no known declarations of interest. The project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Airways Group.
The full review is available in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010346.pub2).
FROM THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
Atopic dermatitis increases risk of ADHD, comorbidities add to it
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with an increased risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults, and a host of factors and comorbid conditions increase this risk, according to a study published in the British Journal of Dermatology.
Mark A. Strom and his associates at Northwestern University in Chicago examined data from 19 U.S. population-based surveys on 354,416 children ages 2-17 years and 34,613 adults over the age of 18 to determine if childhood and adult AD and the severity of AD were associated with ADHD. Additionally, the investigators sought to identify factors contributing to this association (Br J Dermatol. 2016 Apr 23. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14697).
The prevalence of ADHD was 9.4% in children with AD and 7.1% in children without AD. For children, the study results obtained from multivariate models adjusting for age, sex, sociodemographic variables, allergic disease, and health care utilization confirmed the previously established increase in risk for ADHD in those with AD for an adjusted odds ratio of 1.14. Severe AD and sleep disturbance were found to independently and synergistically contribute to the increased risk of ADHD. Also, the presence of AD in the absence of other allergic disease was associated with an increased risk for ADHD. Obesity, headaches, and anemia were found to further increase the risk for ADHD in those with AD.
Results from the adjusted multivariate models also established an increased risk for ADHD among adults with AD, for an adjusted odds ratio of 1.61. The presence of asthma, headaches, and insomnia increased this risk. The analysis additionally revealed that a body mass index indicative of underweight status in adults with AD was protective against the risk for developing ADHD.
Mr. Strom and his associates found a significant decrease in their initial odds ratios when they added outpatient health care visitation to their multivariate models, which resulted in an overall pooled odds ratio for the relationship between AD and ADHD just above statistical significance. They speculated that children with AD or ADHD would be more likely to visit health care providers, which could increase the likelihood for diagnosis of comorbid conditions.
Funding was provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Dermatology Foundation. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with an increased risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults, and a host of factors and comorbid conditions increase this risk, according to a study published in the British Journal of Dermatology.
Mark A. Strom and his associates at Northwestern University in Chicago examined data from 19 U.S. population-based surveys on 354,416 children ages 2-17 years and 34,613 adults over the age of 18 to determine if childhood and adult AD and the severity of AD were associated with ADHD. Additionally, the investigators sought to identify factors contributing to this association (Br J Dermatol. 2016 Apr 23. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14697).
The prevalence of ADHD was 9.4% in children with AD and 7.1% in children without AD. For children, the study results obtained from multivariate models adjusting for age, sex, sociodemographic variables, allergic disease, and health care utilization confirmed the previously established increase in risk for ADHD in those with AD for an adjusted odds ratio of 1.14. Severe AD and sleep disturbance were found to independently and synergistically contribute to the increased risk of ADHD. Also, the presence of AD in the absence of other allergic disease was associated with an increased risk for ADHD. Obesity, headaches, and anemia were found to further increase the risk for ADHD in those with AD.
Results from the adjusted multivariate models also established an increased risk for ADHD among adults with AD, for an adjusted odds ratio of 1.61. The presence of asthma, headaches, and insomnia increased this risk. The analysis additionally revealed that a body mass index indicative of underweight status in adults with AD was protective against the risk for developing ADHD.
Mr. Strom and his associates found a significant decrease in their initial odds ratios when they added outpatient health care visitation to their multivariate models, which resulted in an overall pooled odds ratio for the relationship between AD and ADHD just above statistical significance. They speculated that children with AD or ADHD would be more likely to visit health care providers, which could increase the likelihood for diagnosis of comorbid conditions.
Funding was provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Dermatology Foundation. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with an increased risk for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults, and a host of factors and comorbid conditions increase this risk, according to a study published in the British Journal of Dermatology.
Mark A. Strom and his associates at Northwestern University in Chicago examined data from 19 U.S. population-based surveys on 354,416 children ages 2-17 years and 34,613 adults over the age of 18 to determine if childhood and adult AD and the severity of AD were associated with ADHD. Additionally, the investigators sought to identify factors contributing to this association (Br J Dermatol. 2016 Apr 23. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14697).
The prevalence of ADHD was 9.4% in children with AD and 7.1% in children without AD. For children, the study results obtained from multivariate models adjusting for age, sex, sociodemographic variables, allergic disease, and health care utilization confirmed the previously established increase in risk for ADHD in those with AD for an adjusted odds ratio of 1.14. Severe AD and sleep disturbance were found to independently and synergistically contribute to the increased risk of ADHD. Also, the presence of AD in the absence of other allergic disease was associated with an increased risk for ADHD. Obesity, headaches, and anemia were found to further increase the risk for ADHD in those with AD.
Results from the adjusted multivariate models also established an increased risk for ADHD among adults with AD, for an adjusted odds ratio of 1.61. The presence of asthma, headaches, and insomnia increased this risk. The analysis additionally revealed that a body mass index indicative of underweight status in adults with AD was protective against the risk for developing ADHD.
Mr. Strom and his associates found a significant decrease in their initial odds ratios when they added outpatient health care visitation to their multivariate models, which resulted in an overall pooled odds ratio for the relationship between AD and ADHD just above statistical significance. They speculated that children with AD or ADHD would be more likely to visit health care providers, which could increase the likelihood for diagnosis of comorbid conditions.
Funding was provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Dermatology Foundation. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
FROM THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Key clinical point: Several factors contribute to the increased risk for ADHD in children and adults with atopic dermatitis.
Major finding: Children and adults with atopic dermatitis had increased odds of having ADHD of 1.14, which were further increased by the presence of certain comorbidities.
Data sources: Nineteen U.S. population-based surveys on 354,416 children aged 2-17 and 34,613 adults over the age of 18.
Disclosures: Funding was provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Dermatology Foundation. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
More connective tissue disease–associated PAH seen in older patients
Patient age contributes to significant differences in the characteristics and etiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension seen in randomized, controlled trials, including more frequent connective tissue disease–associated disease in older patients, according to a post-hoc analysis of trials.
Additionally, older age was associated with worse baseline functional status, worse outcomes in the 6-minute walk distance, and an overall reduced response to treatment, while hemodynamic severity was higher in younger patients.
“Although registry data have shown that idiopathic PAH [pulmonary arterial hypertension] is increasingly recognized in older populations, our analysis shows that idiopathic etiology was less frequent in the older group. In contrast, CTD [connective tissue disease]–associated PAH accounted for a higher proportion of PAH etiology in the oldest age group,” wrote Jonathan A. Rose of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, and his colleagues (Chest. 2016;149[5]:1234-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.008).
The researchers analyzed seven multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment trials for PAH conducted by United Therapeutics and one open-label extension study that involved following patients being treated with subcutaneous treprostinil for 4 additional years. Data from the open-label extension trial and one of the trials were combined and reported as one trial. All trials excluded patients with a history of left-sided heart disease, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) greater than 15 mmHg, or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) less than 3 Woods units. The researchers categorized the 2,627 patients included in the trials in the following three age groups: 50 years or younger, 51-64 years, and 65 years or older.
Between 53% and 74% of patients in all trials across all age groups had idiopathic PAH, but older patients comprised a significantly smaller proportion of the patients with idiopathic PAH in three of the trials (P = .004) and a significantly higher percentage of the patients with CTD-associated PAH in all of the trials (P less than .001). Across the trials, CTD-associated PAH occurred in 15%-21% of patients 50 years or younger, 25%-40% of those aged 51-64 years, and 27%-49% of those aged 65 years or older.
From baseline to the end in three of the studies, a smaller change in the 6-minute walk distance was seen in older patients and a higher proportion of older patients had an overall decrease in total 6-minute walk distance. Older age remained associated with this outcome measure when only data from treatment-naive patients or the subgroup of patients with CTD-associated PAH were included.
The association between age and lower baseline functional status was observed in four of the trials; A lower proportion of patients in the oldest age group were classified as being of the World Health Organization functional classes I and II, with 9%-32% of patients aged 65 years or older, 10%-33% in those aged 51-64 years, and 16%-43% of those aged 50 years or younger.
Hemodynamic severity was among the areas in which older patients performed better than younger patients, with the oldest age group having lower baseline mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and PVR in the two trials that measured hemodynamics.
“The difference in the clinical function and hemodynamics in older patients may reflect different mechanisms of disease. Older patients may have diminished cardiopulmonary reserve, and similar degrees of hemodynamic severity manifest with a larger functional impairment. Alternatively, additional comorbidities in older patients may contribute to a larger extent, and clinical function may not be as directly related to hemodynamic severity,” according to the researchers.
Mortality was generally small in these studies and not significantly different among age groups, except for in the open-label extension study of Subcutaneous Infusion of Treprostinil in Patients with PAH (SC-TRE) and the Study of Intravenous Remodulin in Patients in India with PAH (TRUST) trials, which were combined and reported on as one trial (P = .0004).
Nausea was the only adverse effect found to be associated with age in more than one trial, and the relationship between it and age in two trials were inconsistent. While a higher incidence of nausea was found in the oldest age group in the Oral Treprostinil as Monotherapy for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (FREEDOM-M) trial (P = .03), a lower incidence of nausea was found in the oldest age group in the Treprostinil Sodium Inhalation Used in the Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial (P = .02).
The analysis was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Two of the authors, Jody M. Cleveland and Youlan Rao, Ph.D., reported being employees of United Therapeutics, while Dr. Omar A. Minai, another author of the report, serves on the scientific advisory board of United Therapeutics. The other authors declared no conflicts.
Patient age contributes to significant differences in the characteristics and etiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension seen in randomized, controlled trials, including more frequent connective tissue disease–associated disease in older patients, according to a post-hoc analysis of trials.
Additionally, older age was associated with worse baseline functional status, worse outcomes in the 6-minute walk distance, and an overall reduced response to treatment, while hemodynamic severity was higher in younger patients.
“Although registry data have shown that idiopathic PAH [pulmonary arterial hypertension] is increasingly recognized in older populations, our analysis shows that idiopathic etiology was less frequent in the older group. In contrast, CTD [connective tissue disease]–associated PAH accounted for a higher proportion of PAH etiology in the oldest age group,” wrote Jonathan A. Rose of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, and his colleagues (Chest. 2016;149[5]:1234-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.008).
The researchers analyzed seven multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment trials for PAH conducted by United Therapeutics and one open-label extension study that involved following patients being treated with subcutaneous treprostinil for 4 additional years. Data from the open-label extension trial and one of the trials were combined and reported as one trial. All trials excluded patients with a history of left-sided heart disease, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) greater than 15 mmHg, or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) less than 3 Woods units. The researchers categorized the 2,627 patients included in the trials in the following three age groups: 50 years or younger, 51-64 years, and 65 years or older.
Between 53% and 74% of patients in all trials across all age groups had idiopathic PAH, but older patients comprised a significantly smaller proportion of the patients with idiopathic PAH in three of the trials (P = .004) and a significantly higher percentage of the patients with CTD-associated PAH in all of the trials (P less than .001). Across the trials, CTD-associated PAH occurred in 15%-21% of patients 50 years or younger, 25%-40% of those aged 51-64 years, and 27%-49% of those aged 65 years or older.
From baseline to the end in three of the studies, a smaller change in the 6-minute walk distance was seen in older patients and a higher proportion of older patients had an overall decrease in total 6-minute walk distance. Older age remained associated with this outcome measure when only data from treatment-naive patients or the subgroup of patients with CTD-associated PAH were included.
The association between age and lower baseline functional status was observed in four of the trials; A lower proportion of patients in the oldest age group were classified as being of the World Health Organization functional classes I and II, with 9%-32% of patients aged 65 years or older, 10%-33% in those aged 51-64 years, and 16%-43% of those aged 50 years or younger.
Hemodynamic severity was among the areas in which older patients performed better than younger patients, with the oldest age group having lower baseline mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and PVR in the two trials that measured hemodynamics.
“The difference in the clinical function and hemodynamics in older patients may reflect different mechanisms of disease. Older patients may have diminished cardiopulmonary reserve, and similar degrees of hemodynamic severity manifest with a larger functional impairment. Alternatively, additional comorbidities in older patients may contribute to a larger extent, and clinical function may not be as directly related to hemodynamic severity,” according to the researchers.
Mortality was generally small in these studies and not significantly different among age groups, except for in the open-label extension study of Subcutaneous Infusion of Treprostinil in Patients with PAH (SC-TRE) and the Study of Intravenous Remodulin in Patients in India with PAH (TRUST) trials, which were combined and reported on as one trial (P = .0004).
Nausea was the only adverse effect found to be associated with age in more than one trial, and the relationship between it and age in two trials were inconsistent. While a higher incidence of nausea was found in the oldest age group in the Oral Treprostinil as Monotherapy for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (FREEDOM-M) trial (P = .03), a lower incidence of nausea was found in the oldest age group in the Treprostinil Sodium Inhalation Used in the Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial (P = .02).
The analysis was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Two of the authors, Jody M. Cleveland and Youlan Rao, Ph.D., reported being employees of United Therapeutics, while Dr. Omar A. Minai, another author of the report, serves on the scientific advisory board of United Therapeutics. The other authors declared no conflicts.
Patient age contributes to significant differences in the characteristics and etiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension seen in randomized, controlled trials, including more frequent connective tissue disease–associated disease in older patients, according to a post-hoc analysis of trials.
Additionally, older age was associated with worse baseline functional status, worse outcomes in the 6-minute walk distance, and an overall reduced response to treatment, while hemodynamic severity was higher in younger patients.
“Although registry data have shown that idiopathic PAH [pulmonary arterial hypertension] is increasingly recognized in older populations, our analysis shows that idiopathic etiology was less frequent in the older group. In contrast, CTD [connective tissue disease]–associated PAH accounted for a higher proportion of PAH etiology in the oldest age group,” wrote Jonathan A. Rose of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, and his colleagues (Chest. 2016;149[5]:1234-44. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.008).
The researchers analyzed seven multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment trials for PAH conducted by United Therapeutics and one open-label extension study that involved following patients being treated with subcutaneous treprostinil for 4 additional years. Data from the open-label extension trial and one of the trials were combined and reported as one trial. All trials excluded patients with a history of left-sided heart disease, pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) greater than 15 mmHg, or pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) less than 3 Woods units. The researchers categorized the 2,627 patients included in the trials in the following three age groups: 50 years or younger, 51-64 years, and 65 years or older.
Between 53% and 74% of patients in all trials across all age groups had idiopathic PAH, but older patients comprised a significantly smaller proportion of the patients with idiopathic PAH in three of the trials (P = .004) and a significantly higher percentage of the patients with CTD-associated PAH in all of the trials (P less than .001). Across the trials, CTD-associated PAH occurred in 15%-21% of patients 50 years or younger, 25%-40% of those aged 51-64 years, and 27%-49% of those aged 65 years or older.
From baseline to the end in three of the studies, a smaller change in the 6-minute walk distance was seen in older patients and a higher proportion of older patients had an overall decrease in total 6-minute walk distance. Older age remained associated with this outcome measure when only data from treatment-naive patients or the subgroup of patients with CTD-associated PAH were included.
The association between age and lower baseline functional status was observed in four of the trials; A lower proportion of patients in the oldest age group were classified as being of the World Health Organization functional classes I and II, with 9%-32% of patients aged 65 years or older, 10%-33% in those aged 51-64 years, and 16%-43% of those aged 50 years or younger.
Hemodynamic severity was among the areas in which older patients performed better than younger patients, with the oldest age group having lower baseline mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and PVR in the two trials that measured hemodynamics.
“The difference in the clinical function and hemodynamics in older patients may reflect different mechanisms of disease. Older patients may have diminished cardiopulmonary reserve, and similar degrees of hemodynamic severity manifest with a larger functional impairment. Alternatively, additional comorbidities in older patients may contribute to a larger extent, and clinical function may not be as directly related to hemodynamic severity,” according to the researchers.
Mortality was generally small in these studies and not significantly different among age groups, except for in the open-label extension study of Subcutaneous Infusion of Treprostinil in Patients with PAH (SC-TRE) and the Study of Intravenous Remodulin in Patients in India with PAH (TRUST) trials, which were combined and reported on as one trial (P = .0004).
Nausea was the only adverse effect found to be associated with age in more than one trial, and the relationship between it and age in two trials were inconsistent. While a higher incidence of nausea was found in the oldest age group in the Oral Treprostinil as Monotherapy for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (FREEDOM-M) trial (P = .03), a lower incidence of nausea was found in the oldest age group in the Treprostinil Sodium Inhalation Used in the Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (TRIUMPH) trial (P = .02).
The analysis was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. Two of the authors, Jody M. Cleveland and Youlan Rao, Ph.D., reported being employees of United Therapeutics, while Dr. Omar A. Minai, another author of the report, serves on the scientific advisory board of United Therapeutics. The other authors declared no conflicts.
FROM CHEST
Predictors of abnormal longitudinal patterns of lung-function growth and decline
When it comes to predictive demographic and clinical factors associated with abnormal patterns of lung growth and decline in those with persistent, mild-to-moderate asthma in childhood, male sex and childhood levels of lung function as assessed by the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) make all the difference, according to the results of a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“Determinants of abnormal patterns of FEV1 growth and decline are multifactorial and complex, and identification of factors associated with the timing of a decline from the maximal level requires longitudinal data,” said author Michael McGeachie, Ph.D., of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues.
To identify these determinants, particularly in those with asthma, Dr. McGeachie and colleagues analyzed longitudinal data from a subset of participants from the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) cohort who were followed from enrollment at the age of 5 to 12 years, into the third decade of life. The trajectory of lung growth and the decline from maximum growth in this large cohort of persons who had persistent, mild-to-moderate asthma in childhood were compared against those from persons without asthma who were participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. (N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1842-52).
Data from 684 participants from the CAMP cohort were assessed and 25% had normal lung-function growth without an early decline, 26% had normal growth and an early decline, 23% had reduced growth without an early decline, and 26% had reduced growth and an early decline. Results of the multinomial logistic-regression analysis of risk factors for abnormal patterns of lung growth and decline showed that the 26% of participants with reduced growth and an early decline had lower FEV1 lung function at enrollment and were more likely to be male, compared with those who had normal growth.
Additional study results indicated that 18% of the participants who had reduced lung-function growth, with or without an early decline, met the case definition for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on the postbronchodilator spirometric criteria at an age of less than 30 years.
Based on their data, Dr. McGeachie and his colleagues said that detection of an abnormal trajectory by means of early and ongoing serial FEV1 monitoring may help identify children and young adults at risk for abnormal lung-function growth that could lead to chronic airflow obstruction in adulthood.
Funding for this project was provided by grants from the Parker B. Francis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Human Genome Research Institute, and the Human Frontier Science Program Organization. Dr. McGeachie reported grant support from one of the funding sources during the conduct of the study. Nineteen coauthors reported they had nothing to disclose and the remainder either reported grant support or ties to industry sources.
When it comes to predictive demographic and clinical factors associated with abnormal patterns of lung growth and decline in those with persistent, mild-to-moderate asthma in childhood, male sex and childhood levels of lung function as assessed by the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) make all the difference, according to the results of a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“Determinants of abnormal patterns of FEV1 growth and decline are multifactorial and complex, and identification of factors associated with the timing of a decline from the maximal level requires longitudinal data,” said author Michael McGeachie, Ph.D., of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues.
To identify these determinants, particularly in those with asthma, Dr. McGeachie and colleagues analyzed longitudinal data from a subset of participants from the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) cohort who were followed from enrollment at the age of 5 to 12 years, into the third decade of life. The trajectory of lung growth and the decline from maximum growth in this large cohort of persons who had persistent, mild-to-moderate asthma in childhood were compared against those from persons without asthma who were participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. (N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1842-52).
Data from 684 participants from the CAMP cohort were assessed and 25% had normal lung-function growth without an early decline, 26% had normal growth and an early decline, 23% had reduced growth without an early decline, and 26% had reduced growth and an early decline. Results of the multinomial logistic-regression analysis of risk factors for abnormal patterns of lung growth and decline showed that the 26% of participants with reduced growth and an early decline had lower FEV1 lung function at enrollment and were more likely to be male, compared with those who had normal growth.
Additional study results indicated that 18% of the participants who had reduced lung-function growth, with or without an early decline, met the case definition for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on the postbronchodilator spirometric criteria at an age of less than 30 years.
Based on their data, Dr. McGeachie and his colleagues said that detection of an abnormal trajectory by means of early and ongoing serial FEV1 monitoring may help identify children and young adults at risk for abnormal lung-function growth that could lead to chronic airflow obstruction in adulthood.
Funding for this project was provided by grants from the Parker B. Francis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Human Genome Research Institute, and the Human Frontier Science Program Organization. Dr. McGeachie reported grant support from one of the funding sources during the conduct of the study. Nineteen coauthors reported they had nothing to disclose and the remainder either reported grant support or ties to industry sources.
When it comes to predictive demographic and clinical factors associated with abnormal patterns of lung growth and decline in those with persistent, mild-to-moderate asthma in childhood, male sex and childhood levels of lung function as assessed by the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) make all the difference, according to the results of a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
“Determinants of abnormal patterns of FEV1 growth and decline are multifactorial and complex, and identification of factors associated with the timing of a decline from the maximal level requires longitudinal data,” said author Michael McGeachie, Ph.D., of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and his colleagues.
To identify these determinants, particularly in those with asthma, Dr. McGeachie and colleagues analyzed longitudinal data from a subset of participants from the Childhood Asthma Management Program (CAMP) cohort who were followed from enrollment at the age of 5 to 12 years, into the third decade of life. The trajectory of lung growth and the decline from maximum growth in this large cohort of persons who had persistent, mild-to-moderate asthma in childhood were compared against those from persons without asthma who were participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. (N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1842-52).
Data from 684 participants from the CAMP cohort were assessed and 25% had normal lung-function growth without an early decline, 26% had normal growth and an early decline, 23% had reduced growth without an early decline, and 26% had reduced growth and an early decline. Results of the multinomial logistic-regression analysis of risk factors for abnormal patterns of lung growth and decline showed that the 26% of participants with reduced growth and an early decline had lower FEV1 lung function at enrollment and were more likely to be male, compared with those who had normal growth.
Additional study results indicated that 18% of the participants who had reduced lung-function growth, with or without an early decline, met the case definition for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on the postbronchodilator spirometric criteria at an age of less than 30 years.
Based on their data, Dr. McGeachie and his colleagues said that detection of an abnormal trajectory by means of early and ongoing serial FEV1 monitoring may help identify children and young adults at risk for abnormal lung-function growth that could lead to chronic airflow obstruction in adulthood.
Funding for this project was provided by grants from the Parker B. Francis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Human Genome Research Institute, and the Human Frontier Science Program Organization. Dr. McGeachie reported grant support from one of the funding sources during the conduct of the study. Nineteen coauthors reported they had nothing to disclose and the remainder either reported grant support or ties to industry sources.
Key clinical point: Abnormal longitudinal patterns of lung-function growth in young asthma patients are associated with specific risk factors and may be related to development of COPD.
Major finding: Those with reduced lung growth and an early decline had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second lung function in childhood and were more likely to be male.
Data sources: A subset of participants from the Childhood Asthma Management Program cohort.
Disclosures: Funding for this project was provided by grants from the Parker B. Francis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the National Human Genome Research Institute, and the Human Frontier Science Program Organization. Dr. McGeachie reported grant support from one of the funding sources during the conduct of the study. Nineteen coauthors reported they had nothing to disclose and the remainder either reported grant support or ties to industry sources.
Azithromycin Fails to Ameliorate Treatment-resistant Cough
Azithromycin does not appear to be an effective agent for those with treatment-resistant cough, but may be useful in treating those with comorbid asthma, according to the results of a study published in Chest.
David Hodgson, Ph.D., from the Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit at the University of Nottingham (England), and colleagues conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial with follow-up visits at 4, 8, and 12 weeks to determine whether treatment with low-dose azithromycin would affect the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, cough severity on a visual analog scale, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. (Chest. 2016 Apr;149[4]:1052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.036).
The study included 40 nonsmoking patients who were being investigated for chronic cough in respiratory clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom. Twenty patients were randomized to receive azithromycin capsules 500 mg daily for 3 days, followed by 250 mg three times a week for 8 weeks, and 20 received lactose-containing placebo capsules taken according to the same dosing schedule. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in LCQ score at week 8.
The study results suggested differences in the primary endpoint in response to treatment with azithromycin; however, statistical significance was not detected after adjusting for baseline values. Ancillary analyses suggested that study subjects with asthma treated with azithromycin exhibited a large and statistically significant improvement in LCQ score when compared with those treated with placebo. This difference was detected at 4 weeks and was statistically significant at the end of the 8-week trial and at all follow-ups. There were no significant changes in FENO levels between any groups in this study, and treatment was considered to be well tolerated.
Based on their data, Dr. Hodgson and colleagues said that their results were not supportive of the routine use of low-dose macrolides in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. They also noted that data from their ancillary analyses were suggestive of an association between azithromycin treatment and improvement in LCQ in those with chronic cough and coexisting asthma that could be a focus of additional research.
Funding for this project was provided by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Fellowship. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Azithromycin does not appear to be an effective agent for those with treatment-resistant cough, but may be useful in treating those with comorbid asthma, according to the results of a study published in Chest.
David Hodgson, Ph.D., from the Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit at the University of Nottingham (England), and colleagues conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial with follow-up visits at 4, 8, and 12 weeks to determine whether treatment with low-dose azithromycin would affect the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, cough severity on a visual analog scale, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. (Chest. 2016 Apr;149[4]:1052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.036).
The study included 40 nonsmoking patients who were being investigated for chronic cough in respiratory clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom. Twenty patients were randomized to receive azithromycin capsules 500 mg daily for 3 days, followed by 250 mg three times a week for 8 weeks, and 20 received lactose-containing placebo capsules taken according to the same dosing schedule. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in LCQ score at week 8.
The study results suggested differences in the primary endpoint in response to treatment with azithromycin; however, statistical significance was not detected after adjusting for baseline values. Ancillary analyses suggested that study subjects with asthma treated with azithromycin exhibited a large and statistically significant improvement in LCQ score when compared with those treated with placebo. This difference was detected at 4 weeks and was statistically significant at the end of the 8-week trial and at all follow-ups. There were no significant changes in FENO levels between any groups in this study, and treatment was considered to be well tolerated.
Based on their data, Dr. Hodgson and colleagues said that their results were not supportive of the routine use of low-dose macrolides in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. They also noted that data from their ancillary analyses were suggestive of an association between azithromycin treatment and improvement in LCQ in those with chronic cough and coexisting asthma that could be a focus of additional research.
Funding for this project was provided by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Fellowship. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Azithromycin does not appear to be an effective agent for those with treatment-resistant cough, but may be useful in treating those with comorbid asthma, according to the results of a study published in Chest.
David Hodgson, Ph.D., from the Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit at the University of Nottingham (England), and colleagues conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial with follow-up visits at 4, 8, and 12 weeks to determine whether treatment with low-dose azithromycin would affect the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, cough severity on a visual analog scale, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. (Chest. 2016 Apr;149[4]:1052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.036).
The study included 40 nonsmoking patients who were being investigated for chronic cough in respiratory clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom. Twenty patients were randomized to receive azithromycin capsules 500 mg daily for 3 days, followed by 250 mg three times a week for 8 weeks, and 20 received lactose-containing placebo capsules taken according to the same dosing schedule. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in LCQ score at week 8.
The study results suggested differences in the primary endpoint in response to treatment with azithromycin; however, statistical significance was not detected after adjusting for baseline values. Ancillary analyses suggested that study subjects with asthma treated with azithromycin exhibited a large and statistically significant improvement in LCQ score when compared with those treated with placebo. This difference was detected at 4 weeks and was statistically significant at the end of the 8-week trial and at all follow-ups. There were no significant changes in FENO levels between any groups in this study, and treatment was considered to be well tolerated.
Based on their data, Dr. Hodgson and colleagues said that their results were not supportive of the routine use of low-dose macrolides in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. They also noted that data from their ancillary analyses were suggestive of an association between azithromycin treatment and improvement in LCQ in those with chronic cough and coexisting asthma that could be a focus of additional research.
Funding for this project was provided by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Fellowship. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
FROM CHEST
Azithromycin fails to ameliorate treatment-resistant cough
Azithromycin does not appear to be an effective agent for those with treatment-resistant cough, but may be useful in treating those with comorbid asthma, according to the results of a study published in Chest.
David Hodgson, Ph.D., from the Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit at the University of Nottingham (England), and colleagues conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial with follow-up visits at 4, 8, and 12 weeks to determine whether treatment with low-dose azithromycin would affect the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, cough severity on a visual analog scale, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. (Chest. 2016 Apr;149[4]:1052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.036).
The study included 40 nonsmoking patients who were being investigated for chronic cough in respiratory clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom. Twenty patients were randomized to receive azithromycin capsules 500 mg daily for 3 days, followed by 250 mg three times a week for 8 weeks, and 20 received lactose-containing placebo capsules taken according to the same dosing schedule. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in LCQ score at week 8.
The study results suggested differences in the primary endpoint in response to treatment with azithromycin; however, statistical significance was not detected after adjusting for baseline values. Ancillary analyses suggested that study subjects with asthma treated with azithromycin exhibited a large and statistically significant improvement in LCQ score when compared with those treated with placebo. This difference was detected at 4 weeks and was statistically significant at the end of the 8-week trial and at all follow-ups. There were no significant changes in FENO levels between any groups in this study, and treatment was considered to be well tolerated.
Based on their data, Dr. Hodgson and colleagues said that their results were not supportive of the routine use of low-dose macrolides in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. They also noted that data from their ancillary analyses were suggestive of an association between azithromycin treatment and improvement in LCQ in those with chronic cough and coexisting asthma that could be a focus of additional research.
Funding for this project was provided by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Fellowship. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Azithromycin does not appear to be an effective agent for those with treatment-resistant cough, but may be useful in treating those with comorbid asthma, according to the results of a study published in Chest.
David Hodgson, Ph.D., from the Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit at the University of Nottingham (England), and colleagues conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial with follow-up visits at 4, 8, and 12 weeks to determine whether treatment with low-dose azithromycin would affect the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, cough severity on a visual analog scale, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. (Chest. 2016 Apr;149[4]:1052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.036).
The study included 40 nonsmoking patients who were being investigated for chronic cough in respiratory clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom. Twenty patients were randomized to receive azithromycin capsules 500 mg daily for 3 days, followed by 250 mg three times a week for 8 weeks, and 20 received lactose-containing placebo capsules taken according to the same dosing schedule. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in LCQ score at week 8.
The study results suggested differences in the primary endpoint in response to treatment with azithromycin; however, statistical significance was not detected after adjusting for baseline values. Ancillary analyses suggested that study subjects with asthma treated with azithromycin exhibited a large and statistically significant improvement in LCQ score when compared with those treated with placebo. This difference was detected at 4 weeks and was statistically significant at the end of the 8-week trial and at all follow-ups. There were no significant changes in FENO levels between any groups in this study, and treatment was considered to be well tolerated.
Based on their data, Dr. Hodgson and colleagues said that their results were not supportive of the routine use of low-dose macrolides in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. They also noted that data from their ancillary analyses were suggestive of an association between azithromycin treatment and improvement in LCQ in those with chronic cough and coexisting asthma that could be a focus of additional research.
Funding for this project was provided by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Fellowship. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Azithromycin does not appear to be an effective agent for those with treatment-resistant cough, but may be useful in treating those with comorbid asthma, according to the results of a study published in Chest.
David Hodgson, Ph.D., from the Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit at the University of Nottingham (England), and colleagues conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial with follow-up visits at 4, 8, and 12 weeks to determine whether treatment with low-dose azithromycin would affect the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, cough severity on a visual analog scale, and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. (Chest. 2016 Apr;149[4]:1052-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.12.036).
The study included 40 nonsmoking patients who were being investigated for chronic cough in respiratory clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom. Twenty patients were randomized to receive azithromycin capsules 500 mg daily for 3 days, followed by 250 mg three times a week for 8 weeks, and 20 received lactose-containing placebo capsules taken according to the same dosing schedule. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline in LCQ score at week 8.
The study results suggested differences in the primary endpoint in response to treatment with azithromycin; however, statistical significance was not detected after adjusting for baseline values. Ancillary analyses suggested that study subjects with asthma treated with azithromycin exhibited a large and statistically significant improvement in LCQ score when compared with those treated with placebo. This difference was detected at 4 weeks and was statistically significant at the end of the 8-week trial and at all follow-ups. There were no significant changes in FENO levels between any groups in this study, and treatment was considered to be well tolerated.
Based on their data, Dr. Hodgson and colleagues said that their results were not supportive of the routine use of low-dose macrolides in patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough. They also noted that data from their ancillary analyses were suggestive of an association between azithromycin treatment and improvement in LCQ in those with chronic cough and coexisting asthma that could be a focus of additional research.
Funding for this project was provided by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Fellowship. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
FROM CHEST
Key clinical point: This study did not support the clinical efficacy of low-dose macrolides for patients with treatment-resistant chronic cough.
Major finding: Leicester Cough Questionnaire scores did not differ significantly between the azithromycin and placebo groups after 8 weeks of treatment.
Data sources: Patients being investigated for chronic cough identified from respiratory clinics at Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom between July 2009 and August 2012.
Disclosures: Funding for this project was provided by a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Fellowship. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
SIDS most likely in swaddled infants placed on front or side
Sudden infant death syndrome is significantly more likely in infants who are swaddled and placed on the front or side, according to a meta-analysis by Anna S. Pease of the University of Bristol (England), and her associates.
They looked at four studies covering 760 cases of SIDS and 1,759 controls. The odds ratio for swaddling when infant death occurred was 1.58. Risk was highest when swaddled infants were placed on their stomachs, with an OR of 12.99, though risk was also high for children placed on their sides, with an OR of 3.16. Swaddled infants placed on their backs had the lowest risk, with an OR of 1.93.
Some evidence suggested that swaddling risk increased as the infant got older, with an odds ratio of 2.53 in children older than 6 months; however, cases were uncommon and the relationship is not definitive.
“Given the marked increase in infants swaddled and found prone (rather than placed prone), coupled with an increased risk of swaddling with increased age regardless of sleeping position, health professionals and current guidelines should consider an appropriate age limit at which swaddling should be discouraged,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in Pediatrics (2016. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3275).
Sudden infant death syndrome is significantly more likely in infants who are swaddled and placed on the front or side, according to a meta-analysis by Anna S. Pease of the University of Bristol (England), and her associates.
They looked at four studies covering 760 cases of SIDS and 1,759 controls. The odds ratio for swaddling when infant death occurred was 1.58. Risk was highest when swaddled infants were placed on their stomachs, with an OR of 12.99, though risk was also high for children placed on their sides, with an OR of 3.16. Swaddled infants placed on their backs had the lowest risk, with an OR of 1.93.
Some evidence suggested that swaddling risk increased as the infant got older, with an odds ratio of 2.53 in children older than 6 months; however, cases were uncommon and the relationship is not definitive.
“Given the marked increase in infants swaddled and found prone (rather than placed prone), coupled with an increased risk of swaddling with increased age regardless of sleeping position, health professionals and current guidelines should consider an appropriate age limit at which swaddling should be discouraged,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in Pediatrics (2016. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3275).
Sudden infant death syndrome is significantly more likely in infants who are swaddled and placed on the front or side, according to a meta-analysis by Anna S. Pease of the University of Bristol (England), and her associates.
They looked at four studies covering 760 cases of SIDS and 1,759 controls. The odds ratio for swaddling when infant death occurred was 1.58. Risk was highest when swaddled infants were placed on their stomachs, with an OR of 12.99, though risk was also high for children placed on their sides, with an OR of 3.16. Swaddled infants placed on their backs had the lowest risk, with an OR of 1.93.
Some evidence suggested that swaddling risk increased as the infant got older, with an odds ratio of 2.53 in children older than 6 months; however, cases were uncommon and the relationship is not definitive.
“Given the marked increase in infants swaddled and found prone (rather than placed prone), coupled with an increased risk of swaddling with increased age regardless of sleeping position, health professionals and current guidelines should consider an appropriate age limit at which swaddling should be discouraged,” the investigators concluded.
Find the full study in Pediatrics (2016. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3275).
FROM PEDIATRICS
Reassurance on cardiovascular safety of Breo Ellipta for COPD
CHICAGO – Using an inhaled long-acting beta agonist and corticosteroid to treat patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have known cardiovascular disease had no impact on the cardiovascular event rate in the landmark SUMMIT trial, Dr. David E. Newby reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
SUMMIT (the Study to Understand Mortality and Morbidity) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 43-country, four-arm clinical trial in which 16,485 patients with moderate COPD were placed on once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 mcg by dry powder inhaler (Breo Ellipta), either drug alone, or placebo for an average of 2 years. Two-thirds of participants had overt cardiovascular disease; the rest were at high risk as defined by age greater than 60 years plus the presence of two or more cardiovascular risk factors.
This was the first large prospective clinical trial to investigate the impact of respiratory therapy on survival in patients with two commonly comorbid conditions. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events – a prespecified secondary endpoint – was of major interest because some other long-acting beta agonists have been linked to increased cardiovascular risk, explained Dr. Newby of the University of Edinburgh.
The primary endpoint in SUMMIT was all-cause mortality. The 12.2% relative risk reduction in the fluticasone furoate/vilanterol group, compared with placebo, didn’t achieve statistical significance. Neither did the 7.4% reduction in the secondary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, unstable angina, or TIA seen in the corticosteroid/LABA group, which is reassuring from a safety standpoint, he noted.
A positive result was seen for another secondary endpoint: the rate of lung function decline as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The rate of decline was 8 mL/year less with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol, compared with placebo.
The Breo Ellipta group also had significantly lower rates of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, hospitalization for exacerbations, and improved quality of life as measured by the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire – COPD total score at 12 months.
The SUMMIT trial was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. The presenter is a consultant to GSK and eight other pharmaceutical companies.
CHICAGO – Using an inhaled long-acting beta agonist and corticosteroid to treat patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have known cardiovascular disease had no impact on the cardiovascular event rate in the landmark SUMMIT trial, Dr. David E. Newby reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
SUMMIT (the Study to Understand Mortality and Morbidity) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 43-country, four-arm clinical trial in which 16,485 patients with moderate COPD were placed on once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 mcg by dry powder inhaler (Breo Ellipta), either drug alone, or placebo for an average of 2 years. Two-thirds of participants had overt cardiovascular disease; the rest were at high risk as defined by age greater than 60 years plus the presence of two or more cardiovascular risk factors.
This was the first large prospective clinical trial to investigate the impact of respiratory therapy on survival in patients with two commonly comorbid conditions. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events – a prespecified secondary endpoint – was of major interest because some other long-acting beta agonists have been linked to increased cardiovascular risk, explained Dr. Newby of the University of Edinburgh.
The primary endpoint in SUMMIT was all-cause mortality. The 12.2% relative risk reduction in the fluticasone furoate/vilanterol group, compared with placebo, didn’t achieve statistical significance. Neither did the 7.4% reduction in the secondary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, unstable angina, or TIA seen in the corticosteroid/LABA group, which is reassuring from a safety standpoint, he noted.
A positive result was seen for another secondary endpoint: the rate of lung function decline as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The rate of decline was 8 mL/year less with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol, compared with placebo.
The Breo Ellipta group also had significantly lower rates of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, hospitalization for exacerbations, and improved quality of life as measured by the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire – COPD total score at 12 months.
The SUMMIT trial was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. The presenter is a consultant to GSK and eight other pharmaceutical companies.
CHICAGO – Using an inhaled long-acting beta agonist and corticosteroid to treat patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have known cardiovascular disease had no impact on the cardiovascular event rate in the landmark SUMMIT trial, Dr. David E. Newby reported at the annual meeting of the American College of Cardiology.
SUMMIT (the Study to Understand Mortality and Morbidity) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 43-country, four-arm clinical trial in which 16,485 patients with moderate COPD were placed on once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 mcg by dry powder inhaler (Breo Ellipta), either drug alone, or placebo for an average of 2 years. Two-thirds of participants had overt cardiovascular disease; the rest were at high risk as defined by age greater than 60 years plus the presence of two or more cardiovascular risk factors.
This was the first large prospective clinical trial to investigate the impact of respiratory therapy on survival in patients with two commonly comorbid conditions. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events – a prespecified secondary endpoint – was of major interest because some other long-acting beta agonists have been linked to increased cardiovascular risk, explained Dr. Newby of the University of Edinburgh.
The primary endpoint in SUMMIT was all-cause mortality. The 12.2% relative risk reduction in the fluticasone furoate/vilanterol group, compared with placebo, didn’t achieve statistical significance. Neither did the 7.4% reduction in the secondary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, unstable angina, or TIA seen in the corticosteroid/LABA group, which is reassuring from a safety standpoint, he noted.
A positive result was seen for another secondary endpoint: the rate of lung function decline as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The rate of decline was 8 mL/year less with fluticasone furoate/vilanterol, compared with placebo.
The Breo Ellipta group also had significantly lower rates of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, hospitalization for exacerbations, and improved quality of life as measured by the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire – COPD total score at 12 months.
The SUMMIT trial was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. The presenter is a consultant to GSK and eight other pharmaceutical companies.
AT ACC 16
Key clinical point: Once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 mcg to treat moderate COPD in patients with comorbid cardiovascular disease did not increase their risk of cardiovascular events.
Major finding: The major adverse cardiovascular event rate in patients on once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate/vilanterol 100/25 mcg was 7.4% less than with placebo, a nonsignificant difference.
Data source: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year clinical trial including 16,485 patients with moderate COPD and overt cardiovascular disease or at high risk for it.
Disclosures: The SUMMIT trial was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. The presenter is a consultant to GSK and eight other pharmaceutical companies.
Novel device therapy shows continued benefits in pediatric peanut allergy
LOS ANGELES – A peanut protein–bearing skin patch known as the Viaskin Peanut gave a continued strong performance for treatment of peanut allergy in children during the second year of an international study of this novel form of epicutaneous immunotherapy.
The clinical response rate in 6- to 11-year-olds after 1 year of treatment with the 250-mcg dose of peanut protein in the medical device was 57% in the phase IIb, double-blind, 22-site, international VIPES trial, as reported last year.
After an additional year of treatment with the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut in the open-label extension study known as OLFUS-VIPES, this rate climbed to 80%. Safety and tolerability of the device therapy remained excellent, Dr. Hugh A. Sampson said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology.
In adolescents and adults, however, the clinical response – while significantly better than placebo in VIPES – was less robust than in children, and it remained stable from year 1 to year 2. This is believed to be due to the greater plasticity of the immune system in children, observed Dr. Sampson, director of the Jaffe Food Allergy Institute at Kravis Children’s Hospital at Mount Sinai in New York and chief scientific officer at DBV Technologies, which is developing the Viaskin Peanut.
The ongoing phase III trial uses the 250-mcg dose of peanut protein – the highest of several doses studied in VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES – and is restricted to peanut-allergic children ages 4-11 years. Doses of peanut protein greater than 250 mcg will be explored in separate studies of adolescents and adults.
The clinical response rate in children on the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut rose from 57% after 1 year to 80% – that is, 16 of 20 subjects – after 2 years. A clinical response in VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES was defined as nonreactivity to a dose of at least 1,000 mg of peanut protein – the equivalent of four peanuts – during a formal double-blind food challenge or at least a tenfold increase in the eliciting dose, compared to the original eliciting dose.
In VIPES, one-third of children on the 250-mcg device therapy for 1 year could tolerate at least 1,000 mg of peanut protein; after an additional year of open-label therapy, 60% of children were able to do so.
Among 6- to 11-year-olds, the median cumulative reactive dose of peanut protein was 44 mg at baseline, 444 mg after 12 months of using the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut, and 1,444 mg at 2 years.
The children’s immunologic response to the Viaskin Peanut was impressive: A 40% reduction from baseline in peanut IgE at 2 years, along with a ninefold increase in protective peanut-specific IgG4.
The skin patch consists of a dried allergen – in this case, peanut protein – which is made electrostatically adherent to a membrane on a Band-Aid–like chamber. A set of patches is placed on noneczematous skin on a child’s back and on the inner upper arm of older patients. Moisture emitted from the skin gradually causes the protein allergen to solubilize and get absorbed into the outer layer of the skin. It is then picked up by antigen-presenting Langerhans cells and transported to regional lymph nodes for deactivation. The patches are changed daily.
“It appears that we need to look at the skin as a tolerogenic organ when it’s uninflamed,” Dr. Sampson observed.
Compliance with treatment was in excess of 96% in both VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES. There have been no serious treatment-related adverse events and no need for the use of epinephrine. Side effects have been limited to occasional mild to moderate application site reactions easily managed with antihistamines and/or topical steroids, according to Dr. Sampson.
The double-blind VIPES study included 207 subjects with documented peanut allergy. OLFUS-VIPES, which will continue for 1 additional year of open-label therapy, includes 171 of the original 207, including 97 children, 49 adolescents, and 25 adults up to age 55 years.
“We’ll see if there’s continued improvement in children through the third year or it levels off, but based upon the immunologic parameters I think it’s having continued effect,” the pediatric allergist said.
LOS ANGELES – A peanut protein–bearing skin patch known as the Viaskin Peanut gave a continued strong performance for treatment of peanut allergy in children during the second year of an international study of this novel form of epicutaneous immunotherapy.
The clinical response rate in 6- to 11-year-olds after 1 year of treatment with the 250-mcg dose of peanut protein in the medical device was 57% in the phase IIb, double-blind, 22-site, international VIPES trial, as reported last year.
After an additional year of treatment with the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut in the open-label extension study known as OLFUS-VIPES, this rate climbed to 80%. Safety and tolerability of the device therapy remained excellent, Dr. Hugh A. Sampson said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology.
In adolescents and adults, however, the clinical response – while significantly better than placebo in VIPES – was less robust than in children, and it remained stable from year 1 to year 2. This is believed to be due to the greater plasticity of the immune system in children, observed Dr. Sampson, director of the Jaffe Food Allergy Institute at Kravis Children’s Hospital at Mount Sinai in New York and chief scientific officer at DBV Technologies, which is developing the Viaskin Peanut.
The ongoing phase III trial uses the 250-mcg dose of peanut protein – the highest of several doses studied in VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES – and is restricted to peanut-allergic children ages 4-11 years. Doses of peanut protein greater than 250 mcg will be explored in separate studies of adolescents and adults.
The clinical response rate in children on the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut rose from 57% after 1 year to 80% – that is, 16 of 20 subjects – after 2 years. A clinical response in VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES was defined as nonreactivity to a dose of at least 1,000 mg of peanut protein – the equivalent of four peanuts – during a formal double-blind food challenge or at least a tenfold increase in the eliciting dose, compared to the original eliciting dose.
In VIPES, one-third of children on the 250-mcg device therapy for 1 year could tolerate at least 1,000 mg of peanut protein; after an additional year of open-label therapy, 60% of children were able to do so.
Among 6- to 11-year-olds, the median cumulative reactive dose of peanut protein was 44 mg at baseline, 444 mg after 12 months of using the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut, and 1,444 mg at 2 years.
The children’s immunologic response to the Viaskin Peanut was impressive: A 40% reduction from baseline in peanut IgE at 2 years, along with a ninefold increase in protective peanut-specific IgG4.
The skin patch consists of a dried allergen – in this case, peanut protein – which is made electrostatically adherent to a membrane on a Band-Aid–like chamber. A set of patches is placed on noneczematous skin on a child’s back and on the inner upper arm of older patients. Moisture emitted from the skin gradually causes the protein allergen to solubilize and get absorbed into the outer layer of the skin. It is then picked up by antigen-presenting Langerhans cells and transported to regional lymph nodes for deactivation. The patches are changed daily.
“It appears that we need to look at the skin as a tolerogenic organ when it’s uninflamed,” Dr. Sampson observed.
Compliance with treatment was in excess of 96% in both VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES. There have been no serious treatment-related adverse events and no need for the use of epinephrine. Side effects have been limited to occasional mild to moderate application site reactions easily managed with antihistamines and/or topical steroids, according to Dr. Sampson.
The double-blind VIPES study included 207 subjects with documented peanut allergy. OLFUS-VIPES, which will continue for 1 additional year of open-label therapy, includes 171 of the original 207, including 97 children, 49 adolescents, and 25 adults up to age 55 years.
“We’ll see if there’s continued improvement in children through the third year or it levels off, but based upon the immunologic parameters I think it’s having continued effect,” the pediatric allergist said.
LOS ANGELES – A peanut protein–bearing skin patch known as the Viaskin Peanut gave a continued strong performance for treatment of peanut allergy in children during the second year of an international study of this novel form of epicutaneous immunotherapy.
The clinical response rate in 6- to 11-year-olds after 1 year of treatment with the 250-mcg dose of peanut protein in the medical device was 57% in the phase IIb, double-blind, 22-site, international VIPES trial, as reported last year.
After an additional year of treatment with the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut in the open-label extension study known as OLFUS-VIPES, this rate climbed to 80%. Safety and tolerability of the device therapy remained excellent, Dr. Hugh A. Sampson said at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology.
In adolescents and adults, however, the clinical response – while significantly better than placebo in VIPES – was less robust than in children, and it remained stable from year 1 to year 2. This is believed to be due to the greater plasticity of the immune system in children, observed Dr. Sampson, director of the Jaffe Food Allergy Institute at Kravis Children’s Hospital at Mount Sinai in New York and chief scientific officer at DBV Technologies, which is developing the Viaskin Peanut.
The ongoing phase III trial uses the 250-mcg dose of peanut protein – the highest of several doses studied in VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES – and is restricted to peanut-allergic children ages 4-11 years. Doses of peanut protein greater than 250 mcg will be explored in separate studies of adolescents and adults.
The clinical response rate in children on the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut rose from 57% after 1 year to 80% – that is, 16 of 20 subjects – after 2 years. A clinical response in VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES was defined as nonreactivity to a dose of at least 1,000 mg of peanut protein – the equivalent of four peanuts – during a formal double-blind food challenge or at least a tenfold increase in the eliciting dose, compared to the original eliciting dose.
In VIPES, one-third of children on the 250-mcg device therapy for 1 year could tolerate at least 1,000 mg of peanut protein; after an additional year of open-label therapy, 60% of children were able to do so.
Among 6- to 11-year-olds, the median cumulative reactive dose of peanut protein was 44 mg at baseline, 444 mg after 12 months of using the 250-mcg Viaskin Peanut, and 1,444 mg at 2 years.
The children’s immunologic response to the Viaskin Peanut was impressive: A 40% reduction from baseline in peanut IgE at 2 years, along with a ninefold increase in protective peanut-specific IgG4.
The skin patch consists of a dried allergen – in this case, peanut protein – which is made electrostatically adherent to a membrane on a Band-Aid–like chamber. A set of patches is placed on noneczematous skin on a child’s back and on the inner upper arm of older patients. Moisture emitted from the skin gradually causes the protein allergen to solubilize and get absorbed into the outer layer of the skin. It is then picked up by antigen-presenting Langerhans cells and transported to regional lymph nodes for deactivation. The patches are changed daily.
“It appears that we need to look at the skin as a tolerogenic organ when it’s uninflamed,” Dr. Sampson observed.
Compliance with treatment was in excess of 96% in both VIPES and OLFUS-VIPES. There have been no serious treatment-related adverse events and no need for the use of epinephrine. Side effects have been limited to occasional mild to moderate application site reactions easily managed with antihistamines and/or topical steroids, according to Dr. Sampson.
The double-blind VIPES study included 207 subjects with documented peanut allergy. OLFUS-VIPES, which will continue for 1 additional year of open-label therapy, includes 171 of the original 207, including 97 children, 49 adolescents, and 25 adults up to age 55 years.
“We’ll see if there’s continued improvement in children through the third year or it levels off, but based upon the immunologic parameters I think it’s having continued effect,” the pediatric allergist said.
AT 2016 AAAAI ANNUAL MEETING
Key clinical point: A peanut protein–bearing skin patch shows favorable efficacy and safety as a treatment for peanut allergy, especially in children.
Major finding: After 1 year using the Viaskin Peanut device at the 250-mcg dose, one-third of formerly peanut-allergic children tolerated at least 1,000 mg of peanut protein in an oral food challenge; after 2 years using the patch, the rate increased to 60%.
Data source: Ongoing 2-year, open-label extension of the yearlong, double-blind, randomized VIPES trial of 171 peanut-allergic subjects aged 6-55 years.
Disclosures: The study was funded by DBV Technologies and presented by the company’s chief scientific officer.
FDA takes more steps to keep kids off tobacco products
New regulations from the Food and Drug Administration ban the sale of all tobacco products – including e-cigarettes – to minors.
The final rule announced May 5 extends FDA regulatory authority to e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah tobacco, pipe tobacco, and other similar products. Prior to this, FDA regulated cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco under the Tobacco Control Act of 2009.
The new regulations requires manufacturers of all newly regulated products to show that their products meet applicable public health standards and that makers receive marketing authorization from the FDA. The agency now has the authority to evaluate ingredients, product design, and health risks of these products.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell said the move was critical to improve public health and protect future generations from the dangers of tobacco.
“As cigarette smoking among those under 18 has fallen, the use of other nicotine products, including e-cigarettes, has taken a drastic leap,” Secretary Burwell said in a statement. “All of this is creating a new generation of Americans who are at risk of addiction. Today’s announcement is an important step in the fight for a tobacco-free generation – it will help us catch up with changes in the marketplace, put into place rules that protect our kids and give adults information they need to make informed decisions.”
Before the rule, no federal law prohibited stores and websites from selling e-cigarettes, hookah tobacco, and cigars to minors, according to an FDA fact sheet. The new rule aims to deter youth access to the products by barring sales to persons under 18, requiring age verification of purchasers, preventing the selling of covered tobacco products in vending machines, and prohibiting the distribution of free samples.
In addition, manufacturers, importers, and retailers of newly regulated tobacco products must follow provisions, such as registering their manufacturing establishments and providing product listings to the FDA, reporting ingredients and potentially harmful constituents to the agency, and placing health warnings on packages and advertisements, among other guidelines. Manufacturers of newly regulated products must meet the applicable public health standards, unless the product was on the market as of Feb. 15, 2007.
FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Califf said the rule marks a milestone in patient protection.
“As a physician, I’ve seen first hand the devastating health effects of tobacco use,” Dr. Califf said in a statement. “At the FDA, we must do our job under the Tobacco Control Act to reduce the harms caused by tobacco. That includes ensuring consumers have the information they need to make informed decisions about tobacco use and making sure that new tobacco products for purchase come under comprehensive FDA review.”
It’s about time that e-cigarettes are regulated like other tobacco products, said Dr. Roy Herbst, chief of medical oncology at Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven (Conn).
“It’s been quite some time that e-cigarettes have been gaining momentum in our communities and now to finally have them under the purview of the FDA is huge,” Dr. Herbst said in an interview. “It will force more science and research into these products. ... If these are so safe, they should go through clinical studies to prove that.”
Dr. Herbst noted that within 90 days of the published rule, retailers can no longer sell the products to minors, and that within 3 years, the products will be regulated like other tobacco products.
Manufacturers will be allowed to continue selling their products for up to 3 years while they submit a new tobacco product application and the FDA reviews the application, according to the FDA.
Physicians and other health advocates expressed support for the regulations.
“The AMA supports the FDA’s new rule and its efforts to ensure the public – especially young people – is aware of and protected from these harmful products,” AMA President Dr. Steven J. Stack said in a statement. “The new FDA rule, which fills the gap in federal regulations on purchasing, labeling, and packaging of e-cigarettes; cigars; and other tobacco products, is a notable and important step that will ban the sale of these products to minors and improve public health. However, we urge FDA to issue further regulations addressing marketing of these products and banning flavored e-cigarettes, which are particularly enticing to minors.”
The American Academy of Pediatrics also suggested more steps to curb tobacco use.
“The rule is a welcomed starting point, but it is only a framework upon which to build meaningful regulation to end the tobacco epidemic in the United States once and for all,” American Academy of Pediatrics President Dr. Benard P. Dreyer said in a statement. “Today’s action marks an historic step forward in helping to alleviate the threat of lifelong nicotine addiction for our youth, and should serve as a foundation for further progress when it comes to keeping children safe from dangerous tobacco products.”
The rule will be published in the Federal Register on May 10.
On Twitter @legal_med
New regulations from the Food and Drug Administration ban the sale of all tobacco products – including e-cigarettes – to minors.
The final rule announced May 5 extends FDA regulatory authority to e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah tobacco, pipe tobacco, and other similar products. Prior to this, FDA regulated cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco under the Tobacco Control Act of 2009.
The new regulations requires manufacturers of all newly regulated products to show that their products meet applicable public health standards and that makers receive marketing authorization from the FDA. The agency now has the authority to evaluate ingredients, product design, and health risks of these products.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell said the move was critical to improve public health and protect future generations from the dangers of tobacco.
“As cigarette smoking among those under 18 has fallen, the use of other nicotine products, including e-cigarettes, has taken a drastic leap,” Secretary Burwell said in a statement. “All of this is creating a new generation of Americans who are at risk of addiction. Today’s announcement is an important step in the fight for a tobacco-free generation – it will help us catch up with changes in the marketplace, put into place rules that protect our kids and give adults information they need to make informed decisions.”
Before the rule, no federal law prohibited stores and websites from selling e-cigarettes, hookah tobacco, and cigars to minors, according to an FDA fact sheet. The new rule aims to deter youth access to the products by barring sales to persons under 18, requiring age verification of purchasers, preventing the selling of covered tobacco products in vending machines, and prohibiting the distribution of free samples.
In addition, manufacturers, importers, and retailers of newly regulated tobacco products must follow provisions, such as registering their manufacturing establishments and providing product listings to the FDA, reporting ingredients and potentially harmful constituents to the agency, and placing health warnings on packages and advertisements, among other guidelines. Manufacturers of newly regulated products must meet the applicable public health standards, unless the product was on the market as of Feb. 15, 2007.
FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Califf said the rule marks a milestone in patient protection.
“As a physician, I’ve seen first hand the devastating health effects of tobacco use,” Dr. Califf said in a statement. “At the FDA, we must do our job under the Tobacco Control Act to reduce the harms caused by tobacco. That includes ensuring consumers have the information they need to make informed decisions about tobacco use and making sure that new tobacco products for purchase come under comprehensive FDA review.”
It’s about time that e-cigarettes are regulated like other tobacco products, said Dr. Roy Herbst, chief of medical oncology at Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven (Conn).
“It’s been quite some time that e-cigarettes have been gaining momentum in our communities and now to finally have them under the purview of the FDA is huge,” Dr. Herbst said in an interview. “It will force more science and research into these products. ... If these are so safe, they should go through clinical studies to prove that.”
Dr. Herbst noted that within 90 days of the published rule, retailers can no longer sell the products to minors, and that within 3 years, the products will be regulated like other tobacco products.
Manufacturers will be allowed to continue selling their products for up to 3 years while they submit a new tobacco product application and the FDA reviews the application, according to the FDA.
Physicians and other health advocates expressed support for the regulations.
“The AMA supports the FDA’s new rule and its efforts to ensure the public – especially young people – is aware of and protected from these harmful products,” AMA President Dr. Steven J. Stack said in a statement. “The new FDA rule, which fills the gap in federal regulations on purchasing, labeling, and packaging of e-cigarettes; cigars; and other tobacco products, is a notable and important step that will ban the sale of these products to minors and improve public health. However, we urge FDA to issue further regulations addressing marketing of these products and banning flavored e-cigarettes, which are particularly enticing to minors.”
The American Academy of Pediatrics also suggested more steps to curb tobacco use.
“The rule is a welcomed starting point, but it is only a framework upon which to build meaningful regulation to end the tobacco epidemic in the United States once and for all,” American Academy of Pediatrics President Dr. Benard P. Dreyer said in a statement. “Today’s action marks an historic step forward in helping to alleviate the threat of lifelong nicotine addiction for our youth, and should serve as a foundation for further progress when it comes to keeping children safe from dangerous tobacco products.”
The rule will be published in the Federal Register on May 10.
On Twitter @legal_med
New regulations from the Food and Drug Administration ban the sale of all tobacco products – including e-cigarettes – to minors.
The final rule announced May 5 extends FDA regulatory authority to e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah tobacco, pipe tobacco, and other similar products. Prior to this, FDA regulated cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own tobacco, and smokeless tobacco under the Tobacco Control Act of 2009.
The new regulations requires manufacturers of all newly regulated products to show that their products meet applicable public health standards and that makers receive marketing authorization from the FDA. The agency now has the authority to evaluate ingredients, product design, and health risks of these products.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell said the move was critical to improve public health and protect future generations from the dangers of tobacco.
“As cigarette smoking among those under 18 has fallen, the use of other nicotine products, including e-cigarettes, has taken a drastic leap,” Secretary Burwell said in a statement. “All of this is creating a new generation of Americans who are at risk of addiction. Today’s announcement is an important step in the fight for a tobacco-free generation – it will help us catch up with changes in the marketplace, put into place rules that protect our kids and give adults information they need to make informed decisions.”
Before the rule, no federal law prohibited stores and websites from selling e-cigarettes, hookah tobacco, and cigars to minors, according to an FDA fact sheet. The new rule aims to deter youth access to the products by barring sales to persons under 18, requiring age verification of purchasers, preventing the selling of covered tobacco products in vending machines, and prohibiting the distribution of free samples.
In addition, manufacturers, importers, and retailers of newly regulated tobacco products must follow provisions, such as registering their manufacturing establishments and providing product listings to the FDA, reporting ingredients and potentially harmful constituents to the agency, and placing health warnings on packages and advertisements, among other guidelines. Manufacturers of newly regulated products must meet the applicable public health standards, unless the product was on the market as of Feb. 15, 2007.
FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Califf said the rule marks a milestone in patient protection.
“As a physician, I’ve seen first hand the devastating health effects of tobacco use,” Dr. Califf said in a statement. “At the FDA, we must do our job under the Tobacco Control Act to reduce the harms caused by tobacco. That includes ensuring consumers have the information they need to make informed decisions about tobacco use and making sure that new tobacco products for purchase come under comprehensive FDA review.”
It’s about time that e-cigarettes are regulated like other tobacco products, said Dr. Roy Herbst, chief of medical oncology at Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven (Conn).
“It’s been quite some time that e-cigarettes have been gaining momentum in our communities and now to finally have them under the purview of the FDA is huge,” Dr. Herbst said in an interview. “It will force more science and research into these products. ... If these are so safe, they should go through clinical studies to prove that.”
Dr. Herbst noted that within 90 days of the published rule, retailers can no longer sell the products to minors, and that within 3 years, the products will be regulated like other tobacco products.
Manufacturers will be allowed to continue selling their products for up to 3 years while they submit a new tobacco product application and the FDA reviews the application, according to the FDA.
Physicians and other health advocates expressed support for the regulations.
“The AMA supports the FDA’s new rule and its efforts to ensure the public – especially young people – is aware of and protected from these harmful products,” AMA President Dr. Steven J. Stack said in a statement. “The new FDA rule, which fills the gap in federal regulations on purchasing, labeling, and packaging of e-cigarettes; cigars; and other tobacco products, is a notable and important step that will ban the sale of these products to minors and improve public health. However, we urge FDA to issue further regulations addressing marketing of these products and banning flavored e-cigarettes, which are particularly enticing to minors.”
The American Academy of Pediatrics also suggested more steps to curb tobacco use.
“The rule is a welcomed starting point, but it is only a framework upon which to build meaningful regulation to end the tobacco epidemic in the United States once and for all,” American Academy of Pediatrics President Dr. Benard P. Dreyer said in a statement. “Today’s action marks an historic step forward in helping to alleviate the threat of lifelong nicotine addiction for our youth, and should serve as a foundation for further progress when it comes to keeping children safe from dangerous tobacco products.”
The rule will be published in the Federal Register on May 10.
On Twitter @legal_med









